HomeMy WebLinkAbout900020_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181008s
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
October 8, 2018
Marion F. Cox
Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
6409 Rape Road
Monroe, NC 28112
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Cox Brothers Farms/Facility 90-20
General Permit AWS900020
Union County
Dear Mr. Cox:
On October 4, 2018, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Cramer M. Phillips, who was present
and assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704) 663-1699.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
ps•� H N;uft
F161 FB69A2Q84A3...
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated October 4, 2018
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699
Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number: 900020 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS900020
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Union Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit: 10/04/2018 Entry Time: 04:30 pm Exit Time: 6:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Cox Brothers Farms - 601 S Farm Owner Email:
russellfcox@gmail.com
Owner: Marion F Cox Phone:
704-764-9775
Mailing Address: 6409 Rape Rd Monroe NC 28112
Physical Address: 6431 US Hwy 601 S Monroe NC 28112
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 51' 23" Longitude:
80° 25' 11"
Eight miles south of Monroe on Hwy 601. Look for the wood fence and the Cox Brothers sign on the left hand side of road.
General location: Southern part of the county just north of Lansford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John R Cox Operator Certification Number:
19245
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Russell F. Cox Phone : 704-764-9775
On -site representative Cramer M. Phillips Phone : 704-764-9775
DocuSigned by:
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
704-663-1699 Ex
Inspector Signature: Date:
UC2AF677B45D947B...
10/8/2018
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/01/18 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.96 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/18/17 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.39 Lbs/1000 Gallons
07/30/18 > Soil Analysis
DS
page: 1
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 10/04/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 1,200 I 1,000
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 1,700,400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start. Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 90-20POND 18.00 36.00
page: 2
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number:
900020
Inspection Date: 10/04/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 10/04/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
900020
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
MEIEI
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number:
900020
Inspection Date: 10/04/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5