20021099 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020709

Q ? WATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
R William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\Q? pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
] Division of Water Quality
Mr. Chris Granelli
Mulvaney Properties
C/o DPR Associates, Inc.
420 Hawthorn Lane
Charlotte, NC, 28204
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions, Wetland Restoration Program
Dear Mr. Granelli:
September 6, 2002
DWQ# 02-1099
Mecklenburg County
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 185 linear feet of perennial streams
and 70 linear feet of intermittent streams in order to construct three road crossings associated with the Versage Residential Community in
Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on July 9, 2002 and in additional
correspondence received August 24, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number 3375. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when it is issued by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must
notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional conditions listed
below:
We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate for the impacts to
streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory
mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A NCAC 2B.0233(10). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives
and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program), stream impacts (including fill) shall not occur. Mr.
Ron Ferrell should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program. You have
one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of
185 linear feet of perennial streams and 70 linear feet of intermittent streams in the Catawba River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03050103,
and 185 linear feet of stream mitigation is required. Please be aware that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require
rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest foot (15A NCAC 2R .0503(b));
2. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within
50 feet of all streams and ponds. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of
the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands .
3. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification
has been completed.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Mike Parker in our Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-9721.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center
la Qilnek, P.E.
Raleigh, 2 9-1617 (919) 7 - 15
. M1
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mooresville DWO Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Len Rindner, 3714 Spokeshave Lane, Matthews, NC, 28105
021099
r
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Chris Granelli of Mulvaney Properties has permision as outlined below to fill 0.48
acre of wetlands in order to construct three road crossings associated with the Versage Residential Community in Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached
certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION: Versage Residential Community
COUNTY: Mecklenburg
BASIN/SUBBASIN Catawba (03-05-01-03)
Impacts:
185 linear feet of perennial streams and 70 linear feet of intermittent streams
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as outlined below prior to conducting any activities
that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
185 linear feet of perennial streams by W RP
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be rounded to the
nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments according to 15 2r .0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee to
the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the Wetlands
Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this
form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR
PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Aug 24 02 08:17a Leonard Rindner 704 847 0185 p.l
LEONARD S. RINDNER. PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
Fax [phone]
FAX COVER LETTER-7 ?Z e
Send To Fax Number : / OAt 7" lv 8 7 95 Date A40a.
To: /1GFI /?'K?O!
From : 1
Reference:
Un.e.,r4a/Moaanoa•
Copy: ( /f Kwt rA" `V' From :
?af "* &OA1a
Aug 24 02 08:17a Leonard Rindner 704 047 0185 p•2
'r
1
MULVANEY
PR011FRTIES
August 21, 2002
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality - NCDENR
401 Program Coordinator
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Versage Subdivision, Mint Hill, North Carolina
Response to Request for Justification of the Two Road Crossings across Waters of the US
Dear Ms. Karoly :
Please accept this letter as our response to your request for justification of the two road crossings across Waters of the
U.S. in our Mint Hill project. The Versage Subdivision is the first of its kind in the Town of Mint Hill. The Mulvaney
Group purchased the property prior to the development of the new ordinance, under which we have designed the product
we have submitted for your approval. That previous zoning required typical 20,000 sf lot subdivision which could
contain floodplain and environmentally sensitive areas.
With a vision for our property, and in an effort to reduce the impact of its environmentally sensitive areas, 'fhe Mulvaney
Group helped Mint Hill develop a new ordinance for clustering, which was affectionately named "conservation
subd ivisions". This ordinance allows for the set-aside of sensitive areas and, more importantly, 10' less streets/pavement.
With this new ordinance, we have been able to save over 40 percent of the site (including all flood plain except at the
crossings) as open space, never to be developed. With the exception of the crossings, which are now 10' narrower, all
environmentally sensitive areas are left undisturbed.
As you can see, prior to the new ordinance, we would not have been able to develop this property without more
significant impacts. For the purposes of flow and unity within the subdivision, some connectivity is a must for marketing
survival. An identity for such a project cannot be achieved without a certain flow. We feel, through consultations with
our wetland consultant, the Town of Mint Hill and Mecklenburg County Engineering, and the newly developed
ordinance, we have designed the most environmentally responsible use of this property. We have recently obtained our
Corps of Engineers Permit, as well.
Please be advised that the Town of Mint Hill and Mecklenburg County Engineering originally requested additional
crossings for the purpose of "connectivity". Based on our consultant's recommendations, we successfully argued for the
omission of the additional crossings. We have also minimized the impacts at each crossing through the use of energy
dissipaters to shorten the rip-rap aprons. Our site contains over 5,700 linear feet of important streams, of which we are
only disturbing 185 feet, or only 3.251/6 of the important streams on our site.
In summary, we feel we satisfied the "connectivity" requirements set by Mint Hill, while being able to plan and develop
our site in a environmentally sound and marketable manner. 1 hope these explanations help explain our design and, in
turn, satisfy your concerns. Please call if I can answer any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Christopher M. Granelli
Vice President
The Mulvaney Group, LLC
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources . low
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NCDENR
July 17, 2002
Mr. Leonard Rindner tS i(?
3714 Spokeshave Lane
f !l
Matthews, North Carolina 28105 i 0
?n ?!
26
Subject: Project: Versage Community (°----?
County: Mecklenburg W! TL41vi; G p? ?p'-'1
Wr1trT U,'LITY SECTION
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision
by the TNTCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you, the stream restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory
mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of
mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
linear feet Wetland
(acres) Riparian Buffer
ft)
Impact 185
Mitigation Maximum 370
The NCWRP will provide mitigation with an approved combination of wetland restoration, enhancement or
preservation. The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03050103 of the Catawba
River Basin. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between
the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated
November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal Braswell at
[phone].
Siacerely,
• Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACOE
file
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
MEMORANDUM
r
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Michael L Parker
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Rex Gleason
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Versage
Project Number 02 1099
Recvd From APP
Received Date 7/9/02 Recvd By Region 7/15/2002
Project Type residential subdivision
County Mecklenburg
County2
Region Mooresville
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F14 Stream OY O N r? 11-137-9-2 ?-r 30,834. ? 255.00
r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream WRP Stream 185.00
T-1 F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? tr• Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351112 Longitude (ddmmss) 804034
Comments:
Mulvaney Properties (MP) is proposingto construct a residential development that will involve the
impacting of intermittent and perennial channels for three (3) road crossings. The three (3) proposed
road crossings are necessary to access the various sections of the propeu, which is bisected by
three (3) separate channels. The applicant has been asked to provide documentation from the
County that reflects the need for connectivity throughout the project with adjacent State maintained
roads. Meck. County SWIM buffers wjll apl21y to all channels that bjsect thjs IZpe M. The plans
submitted for thjs project reflects the jmplementation of these buffers.
Many of the channels wjthin the project boundary were dry or had very little water On them during tthhe_
sjte vjsit. Characterization of the channels as to whether or not they are intermittent or perennial was
djffjcult due to the on-going drought conditjons jn this region. The characterizatjon su Ipp jed by the
appljcant's consultant aRpears to be accurate,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
' Faciiity Name Versage
Project Number 02 1099
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
The applicant has indicated that the amount of impervious area on this project is less that the 30%
threshold that would require the applicant to implement SW detention.
p, g receipt and concurrence of the information on the connectivity mquirements placed on this
development by Mack., County. -it is recommended that the 401 Certification= be issued.
County Mecklenburg
Regional Contact: Michael L Parker
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

VERSAGE
? g ?002
s
Residential Community
Mint Hill, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE
SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
Prepared for:
Mr. Chris Granelli
Mulvaney Properties
c/o DPR Associates, Inc.
Landscape Architects - Planners - Engineers
420 Hawthorn Lane
Charlotte, N.C. 28204
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
1-[phone]

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
s?`'Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
0401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 4 /it.
If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: /
Mailing Address: G
0iA
Telephone Number:74!1 S152- ZO *f Fax Number: -7a A0 H& /Z.,10
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has sVs."*.- tory authority fo e owner/applic )
Name: of S. vi..f t?,r
Company Affiliation:?S71?f S1*Al&rA4rt L.09%.t,
Mailing Address: G?l7AAC...r??
Telephone Number: Oy ` ` Fa Number: 6f
E-mail Address: I/I a afxeo- 9P
/ ?SvA . /ste t'
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: V e Fee, it 2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only):

3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Nearest Town:
Subdivision name (include phas of number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):_

5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): t4 /spa' • L-74*o W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. D sibe the istinland use or condition of the s?itte, at the time of this application:
IRLOwc c_. W*Lwy^-- l
7. Property size (acres): ''o 1,* 57 AG r-r s
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): //'T LI`V/???" (,,,-.ems
9. River Basin: 64WA4-
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: &1dJ*,-AAJ
11. List the ype of equi ment t be used to construct the
i
4*NVA Can
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this pr ject:_
/AJiai? IAW-UA, Ar A -C I^ t 1A ZwW%.8 J
IV. Prior Project History
ject:
Gv
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online athttp://www.fema.go .
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested we?? kaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) t &'I& p reh r% 1
600 ifc ?•.??•??flrf"
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the propettty: • yo A-C WO&1 **•.at
•
Total area of wetland impact proposed: f . fd r At
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
Indic to on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
Iinear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
/ r t
/G
eCAPI

O
tf I'
?? 1.44rle AA 1 @4

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.). ,?
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Z<r I+ .
rp.% 1K I
Page 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation m /'A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Or
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.

Page 8 of 12
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wry/lindex.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): B? tic
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
' Zone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular from near bank of channel; /-one 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
XII.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater enerate"om the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit lcation?
Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
ThleateliSd Species, 4ccessibiljW proble s, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Wlicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee lredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
7 ? oz
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 11 of 12
LEONARD S. RTNDNER,. PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Planning Tele: [phone]
Fax [phone]
July 7, 2002
Mr. Steve Chapin - US Army Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue - Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
Mr. John R Domey
Division of Water Quality - NCDENR
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazale
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Versam - Appmimatel- 135 acres. Not Hill. Mecklenburg Cougq. North Carolina -
Nationwide Permit #14
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of my client, Chris Granelli of Mulvaney Properties, Inc., I am requesting authorization impact
± 185 linear feet of perennial to intermittent stream, and 70 linear feet of intermittent unimportant stream
to implement three separate road crossings. Stormwater will be filtered over the large buffer areas
utilizing level spreading devices. There are no direct discharges of stormwater to any creek. As depicted
on the attached map, large areas of common open space and required SWIM buffers protect the streams
and wetlands. Over 95% of the important perennial and intermittent streams are preserved. The rezoning
of this property was a comprehensive and complex process. The positive environmental planning was a
major factor in the approval. The following sections present the results of the environmental planning and
a description of the impacts with proposed minimization and mitigation measures.
SUMMARY OF WATERS OF THE U.S
MethodolM
Preliminary identification and delineation of the Jurisdictional Waters on the site were determined
according to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987, with
Appendices. Preliminary data gathering included review and interpretation of topographic maps; USDA
Soil Conservation Survey; aerial photographs, and preliminary site visits to selected areas. Then the
Routine On-Site Determination Method was utilized to determine the upper boundary of the wetlands. In
order to make a positive wetland determination indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and
wetland hydrology must be identified as described in the manual.
Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John R. Domey, Mr. Samar Bou-Gbazale - NCDWQ
Page 3, July 7, 2002
$a ound
The site is within the headwaters of perennial and intermittent tributaries of an unnamed tributary of
Irwin Creek in the Catawba Basin (Water Classification - Q. The majority of the site is a moderately
sloping to steeply sloping ridge. The current land-use is undeveloped woodland and former agricultural
land and woodland areas.
D_ ho
Wetland Hydrology and Hydnc Soils
These riparian areas can be classified as Pahustrine Forested Broad Leaved and Scrub Shrub (PFOIA,
PFO1C, PSSIA). According to the North Carolina Resource Conservation Service, Technical Guide-
Section II-A-2, June 1991, Monacan (Mo) soils are listed as Map Units with inclusion of Hydric Soils in
Mecklenburg County. The streams on the site are intermittent and perennial. Characteristics include
persistent pools, small riffle and pool complexes (a "special aquatic site") in the perennial streams, fish in
the lower portions, amphibians and macro-invertebrates; evidence of wildlife utilizing the stream, and
rocky, gravelly, and sandy channel substrate. Vegetation in riparian and along tributaries is dominated by
Facultative Vegetation.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and North Carolina
1) Important Intermittent and Perennial Streams
(+ 6700 ft) ± 0.90 acres
2) Unimportant Intermittent Channels (+ 600 U) + 0.05 acres
3) Wetlands ± 0.40 acres
4) Pond + 0.80 acres
Total
+ 2.15 acres
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.& and North Carolina
1) Important Intermittent and Perennial Streams
(+ 185 It) ± 0.03 acres
2) Unimportant Intermittent Channels (+ 70 ft + 0.01 acres
3) Wetlands ± 0.00 acres
4) Pond ± 0.00 acres
Total ± 0.04 acres
PROPOSED MINIMIZA TION AND MITIGATION
The following Best Management Practices will be employed and strictly enforced to minimize impacts to
Jurisdictional Waters. These will include:
a) Siltation Barriers; Sediment Traps and Diversion Ditches
b) Barricades to define construction limits to sensitive sites and to protect trees
c) Methods to prevent short term impacts will be inspected regularly and maintained during
Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John R. Dorney, Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazale - NCDWQ
Page 4, July 7, 2002
construction of the project.
d) Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan.
Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other erosion
control structures where appropriate. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish
and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near
surface waters.
e) As required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to prevent
"live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened.
The developgrs are committed to creating an environmentally responsible project. Except for temporary
construction and development impacts, we believe that the proposed project with the proposed mitigation
will not cause significant cumulative impacts to the ecological functions or values of Jurisdictional Waters
of the United States.
MITIGATIONPLAN
The proposed mitigation plan includes protective buffers for the remaining important perennial and
intermittent streams. To meet restoration mitigation requirements for stream impacts by grading, the
developer is proposing to contribute $23,125 to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (185 If
X $125/lf).
PROTECTION FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
The preserved stream and stormwater facility will be protected from future development impacts by the
applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Development of these areas will be
deed restricted in accordance with restrictive covenants, or similar mechanisms, which will be developed
for approval by the USACE and/or NCDWQ.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Federally listed plant and animal species with endangered or threatened status are protected under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. The US Fish and Wildlife Service has identified Schweinitz's sunflower
and the Carolina heelsplitter. Schweinitz's sunflower thrives in hill sun characteristic of succession fields,
margins, and forested openings. Based on a site reconnaissance, habitat conducive to support the
Schweinitz's sunflower does not appear to be present in the project area. The Carolina heelsplitter is a
freshwater mussel, which prefers shaded areas either, in a ponded portion of a small stream or in runs
along steep banks with moderate current. Primary habitat is waters less than three feet deep with a soft
mud, muddy sand, or shady gravelly substrate. It is normally restricted to protected silted areas or under
banks especially associated with obstructions such as stumps or fallen trees. Its current distribution
according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is limited to portions of two streams -- Goose Creek and
Waxhaw Creek - and a small river originating from rural areas in Union County. Therefore it is not
expected to occur on this site.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
The project site is disturbed from previous agricultural activities. No structures were found on the site.
Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John R. Dorney, Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazaie - NCDWQ
Page 5, July 7, 2002
The State Historic Preservation Office may review of the USGS maps at the Office of State Archaeology
and the Survey and Planning Office of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources to determine
if sites are indicated on the National Historic Register within the study area.
AQUATIC HABITAT
The aquatic systems in the project area consist of important wetlands and streams in the Catawba Basin.
A variety of wildlife is supported by these systems including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish,
insects, mollusks, and crustaceans. Therefore strict adherence to an approved erosion and sedimentation
control plan will be maintained during the constriction period in order to control degradation of water
quality downstream and protect the areas to be preserved. Short term construction impacts, primarily
stream sedimentation will affect aquatic habitat, however this will be minimized to the extent practicable
to promote rapid recovery. Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved sedimentation and
erosion control plan. Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other
erosion control structures where appropriate. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish
and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface
waters. Also, as required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to
prevent "live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened.
Aquatic resources are expected to be enhanced through the restoration of wetland areas that flood and
pond for longer durations.
CONCLUSION
Based on the value of the jurisdictional waters and wetlands on this site, the developer through sensitive
site planning has chosen to balance the site's economic viability with its environmental value and
permitability. The goal of the Site Plan and Mitigation Plan is to help balance the environmental
consequences of this development by protecting waters downstream of the project and to preserve
important bottomland hardwood habitats on the site.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your
consideration.
S. Rindner, PWS
rental Planning Consultant
? j

r?
1?v
S?
,L,-%• r ° T-` b n
yy h ti ?
?i

7M)

? 11
?
I '
?
1 tl
Y ? ,? F ? +
_
?:

USGS MINT HILL 35.1875N/80.6746W
^b � {. .y; .7'� �'` Y �F � P• � � "`Z . "`''�'' � -'ii'F X= $,_ epi ` .IkJ S^`F` '`� .
tat
r. _ -.. t .S � � d° �' t' ' is •� '
II""°"p, Mtl ,nom
41
PY
I�Al
jeS: N,
afj
77,
r
f ,'A P r!. �i. ��y�lva"nanm✓• I�,'S � -
tI K �. , c � <.d„v,,,a.'^'°•y� M1meS,o-w`k t �, y� � -., �, A
X-
a
Kai `f'Sa" S� � 1. - �• •+�' d'♦r ,1, ' t � �� y � �� ,� �

MapQuest: Maps: print

;G?r:?tiVe°,F
-by

1 ?:
Idl"
'A I
5
' o ._,

HEARD ANY
GOOD BOOKS
lq ?,l ATELY
E how to gettherei
G,;;T ON
t - i r 1 ,-
02002 Nlapquest.oom, Inc.; 424002 Navigation Technolociieslr
All rights reserved. Use Subject to
License/Copyright
This map Is Informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes
all risk of use. MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such
use.
Privacy Policy & Legal Notices
Page 1 of 2
http:/lwww.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=3Y5TK 1Lwl y8TbSZQoG30C587Thq... 7/6/2002
[7220-7899]KUCK RD
CHARLOTTE, NC
28227, US Back
_ ` i
.1R'9•? .? sf+? tY? ?.r waasnf `:
,- ":EPH. STREAM ?J c
BEGIN INT. STREAM%l.-;.',;?
`s % i, d s:-.;h?v.r?+.«..,+?.w.r+A•?w+lm.,mwl, f" ., .,.. . ?. .
?? .,aer.?AKZ,7:tM1.A}RtSf
PRING
j St
PERENNIAL STREAM
?t y f 1?? r r,,.!? ?;r // ?•?.'+ i +?,;??,` .sC ?{ ? ? ?ri? ?
k der off/ ??, ?r ! a f 1 y'?Y^P!^y? r14f/ k ? 1...
1 • x T '?.,? ! ..?? ,I ag J., t) ' r £ ? 'F 4 , . ?rr'4+>„h'`y7 ?? q ?,+ ° 'l
??` •q ,. f jrJ i l a ?,?1(,(G 7'S .• "7"^"' r r! F `%?G j?..r r< i-,?s ( 8 11. `?t'4 ?, ?? ,F?,'t?'? 1*,"
4'Q, f r .? rf//Y ? ty a €` "`r 1'J p?? 2
J ((f r-23
?. ?? N.- ?il ? ??• h? ;+?t /1 l ?Y.t4 •?? €.T
1 111 (. ff 1,
! { ,' f C . .•."ftjl (.. d I'y ' 1 f lL.'•}if ` f `11 ?t? 1 -?r?" r"? ?" 3 r } 4.' y i J^'
..
_4k
•,/,- `ti .?71???t?ti'a. , lJ?? ? } ? P?Jr xJ? ?J I ? (! ? ?? W"1. ? ^`'+`'1 r•' r "'Yr?•• ?ii,
5 i• tV
.+ r t n ? t J) It
t ^s,,, r ?..G ,a, t s r{ 1 ?r
J!
p Sr, lF`,? fi? (f(` x 4 GULLY E
/ J F a ff tf /r / r r i,k? G - f. _ "I'll, yq,•.?
LINEAR WETLAND y {.',• , y ??.? C.t r1 _ t r? r F1r.. R
WETLAND 7-4 r::. st?`!1s?
? t' t k /v ..k,, 1 f? j%", ?,' ?.. ?r ?i,,a?f, i '. •?.'? '''l+• ,..•+w- `d1 ?4t i \? '? i,
r; .lti d;
WETLAND FRING N''ELIC POND
(Nonjunstictlonal)
jad
5. 'F! !e = y( `?r `vI? 4 iFJ i f + ? 1 G?1?1P 1A'e ; `... ?It i?
f?,h4?"'.: '? ,, t G k ! F: 1 8 ? ?? ,rte" • "9` ?\ ?t
M1 I_,` r 3F , _. INTJPER. STREAM 4 y, r_tti :?
POND
.T k'bt "MstCfll Cht4 ' '. v4+? ti k f ;\'?
!'Yrt 2 ] SIY Kitt6 .4' 14t ,M'SR; J 4. flf 4[ Y^.:N N^ i, wa .. M1'fi ?: 44?"r^F. R ,nl. Y!G.w W +Yh: ?' # P ' f '" k i
G4YM } a l w Rtgm 1Jl.4 447 k +Cd! f'iS. tW I>.• sury;1? yvd,,d5 r A ,/Al lp yqt . rdwNfm0.kx Y^, vro rZ"•-• ??+ 1
..t ( d )olli 0i'io f m tiw fib `>< eX [Y!!R GW6l? LvN1fT' KI'K' AIPj,PAPY(.} r*¢4-x- t M1 ?- ' 8
riu. I u 3 bms 1l,S 4. Mir' IW m'
r.:« v u<l?r: c b xxaa Mesa Gr Bey» mxif
rw rh.x.a+c+. s,alx, ??,aa ,?? x.t• • -<
4"h'. .l6 uI'i. - .
illy to im- W "i+t '.. 4yt„?
tfita N UY (F7 3II k'.?AR.' S1.. ,f W
KrvrL Pw .,N Wi .il[, J',1{YXt yn, (19+R4f 4 N1ea:SNG tq r±sa,nr; ?•l '! y??
gtYwRV x .c w-- W 4+; a nr+*:YS W qa Wm f 1 +u,
R'IfuA d4;FdY, w„ gP.M1I; 1i'd f?•,t ?,fn x„
M1.1£km UP IR71hl' Al po. vq 1%>' L'h;flR`I'1s Yri? ?:
Alq?"kl A! W"' k1w,
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S.
*FOR STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION
N
SCALE 1" = 500' +/-
t
NVId 311S llVU3AO
-Al 56+ L# ONISSOM0
ooqiK
?C'4
J <® f ? _ ?• Q . ; i / r r , ?' r? ????., /° .t' , iii/,,60 b? `\ ?
- ? •? ! 9?- a ? . , ? ? ? r ? ,iii /, ` ??' © / i i /?? ? / ? ? ® \\ ?,1 ?` ?d t
. b./ j ?•I?. \ ® \? 1,`
?Ai
3l OLT £# ONISS02i"' '
! ' ,:mil 1 ? ? 1 11/ ? ? .-\ \? ? ?, ,\ ?. ?? _®. •• \? ? . I I d,
?\\c r 1,(1'11" / \ hire li?/'?Ij,; l ?t ®,?j •'??,,,?,?\,
Al 06+ Z# ONISSOUD
/-BEGIN IMPACT

?
H- `.HEADW?LS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
Y V
1 Y Y r 1 PARALL?L TO R/W. PIPE TO BE
?. - 1 ; I I ( I MITEREID TO HAVE THE ENDS
I t, x
11 r r; FWSH W/HEADWALL
[)TED '/ I } '
111 r //;
BE ' I 1 X11 (i
. I
? f
` , I
I ! I

- 7 6
? - _ _
? `` ? "`?' ---- - - -i- -
I
1 1 ?'6r CUR 1
?I
__

I
+ I
1
00
•

:D PER
Mh ) ,j
o
i ?
. CURB

BR ! I i HANDRAIL',TO BE
IG
ROAD
TA
R
(
ALLEY
I.1 CONSTTRWCTEQ PER\ ?
(
50
! I
?
? I
1 1 EACH
E)
(EACH SIp ,\ S

TpTAL
ESTIMATED STREAM II`PACIT ENd IMPACT
I I
=90LF 1 I

9
a !A R? CULVERT
iRl1 CROSING HW-142 TO HW-143 CROSSING #2 ±90 LF

-77
cl -62
HEADWALLS TO BF- CON5 RUCTED
i - PARALLEL TO JR/W.
' ? ?? -' ' IPE TO/BE
MMO O'HAVEiTE Et08
FJ WH W/HWVIrALL
' "BEGJWIMP?? ?
`. - --? 401
HANDRAIL TO BE
I ? ,' ? ? CONSTRUCTED PER
C-63 + v CMLDS 50.04
? (EACH SIDE)
OQ • 1
i
11 W
F /
END IMPACT r /`?-
TOTAL ; ESTIMATED STREAM IMPACT /
=95LF
CULVERT CROSING HW-140 TO HW-141 CROSSING #1 ±95 LF
-1 SCAM near
HANDRAIL TO BE
CONSTRUCTED PER / HEADWALLSOi BE COOST06CTED
-CMLDS 50.04 / PARALLEk T P"PE,/TO/ BE
unrpFA TO THE tNDS
kEACH SIDE i FLIJ* W/HEADW
/'
13EGItt IMPACT
/ If
H Wes' 144
BEGjN UNIMPORTANT
i, - NTERMITTENT STREAM
/ FES-84,
END IMPA?,T
' W /T45
TOTAL : ESTIMATED STREAM IMPACT
=70L '. /
10 CULVERT CROSING HW-144 TO HW-145
L_1 W-Am. I%ar
i?
O '
CROSSING #3 ±70 LF
r
Triage Check List
Date: 7 -//,- y 2 ,
To: ?RRO Steve Mitchell Project Name ` { 2$A--LE
?FRO Ken Averitte DWQ Project Number l' Z 9 9
?WaRO Deborah Sawyer County F-klP_tn.k i?rr
?WiRO Joanne Steenhuls
?WSRO Jennifer Frye
OARO Mike Parker
COWO P04 Colwell
From: 2:?6 _ f rnn.

Telephone [phone]Y6
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
? Stream length impacted
.Stream determination fGicrmi?- COvt??M
? Wetland determination and distancX blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
XMinimization/avoidance Issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative Impact concerns
Comments