HomeMy WebLinkAbout360006_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180711s
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
July 11, 2018
Mary H. Proctor
Proctor Dairy
112 Hub Carpenter Road
Bessemer City, NC 28016
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Proctor Dairy/Facility 36-06
General Permit AWC360006
Gaston County
Dear Ms. Proctor:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
On June 21, 2018, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality
Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Proctor Dairy and the permitted waste
disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704) 663-1699.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
E
al H Nuft
F161F. >9 2D84A3.
Andrew tner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 21, 2018
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 360006
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 06/21/2018 Entry Time: 02:30 pm
Farm Name: Proctor Dairy
Owner: Mary H Proctor
Mailing Address: 112 Hub Carpenter Rd
Facility Status:
Active
Permit: AWC360006 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Gaston Region: Mooresville
Exit Time: 4:00 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: 704-922-7211
Bessemer City NC 280167705
Physical Address: 112 Hub Carpenter Rd Bessemer City NC 280167705
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 19' 60" Longitude: 81 ° 14' 30"
From the intersection of SR 1453 (Joe Cloninger Rd.) and SR 1454 (Hub Carpenter Rd.), travel 1/2 mile north on Hub Carpenter
Rd. Dairy is on the right. General location: Northwest of Gastonia, west of Hwy 279.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Mary H Proctor Operator Certification Number: 21629
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mary H. Proctor Phone : 704-922-7211
On -site representative Joey W. Proctor Phone : 704-922-7211
.e—DocuSioned bv:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
James Bealle
Inspection Summary:
06/05/18 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.57 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01 /30/18 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.05 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/10/17 > Soil Analysis
DS
C2A1-b / / t945 U94 / b...
Phone: 704-663-1699 Ex
Date: 7/11/2018
page: 1
Permit: AWC360006 Owner - Facility : Mary H Proctor Facility Number: 360006
Inspection Date: 06/21/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle - Dairy Calf
14
15
Cattle -Dairy Heifer
39
0
Cattle -Dry Cow
33
0
Cattle - Milk Cow
225
230
Total Design Capacity: 311
Total SSLW: 405,100
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
PUSH -OFF
20.40
48.00
Waste Pond
RUN-OFF
22.80
48.00
page: 2
Permit: AWC360006 Owner - Facility : Mary H Proctor Facility Number:
360006
Inspection Date: 06/21/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3
Permit: AWC360006 Owner - Facility : Mary H Proctor Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 06/21/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
360006
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑ 0
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4
Permit: AWC360006 Owner - Facility : Mary H Proctor Facility Number:
360006
Inspection Date: 06/21/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5