NCS000163_Inspection Report_20190917

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000163 Effective: 06/01/09 Expiration: 05/31/14 Owner: ColorMate Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Color Mate Incorporated
County: Gaston 5025 S York Rd
Region: Mooresville
Gastonia NC 28053
Contact Person: Donald Buckner Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/17/2019 Entry Time: 01:30PM Exit Time: 04:30PM
Primary Inspector: Christopher Graybeal Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Complaint
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCS000163 Owner - Facility: Color Mate Inc
Inspection Date: 09/17/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
The facility had the majority of required components for a SWPP but they did not have all the documentation compiled in a
plan. The resposibile party was requested to organize files and compile all data in a SWPP. There appeared to be no
operational changes that deviated from the current expired permit therefore it is recommended that a new permit be issued
with the same requirements.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCS000163 Owner - Facility: Color Mate Inc
Inspection Date: 09/17/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
E ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Comment: The facilty did not have a specific SWPP that conatined all the required items. Most of the
required components were available but stored in different locations.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative Monitoring data reviewed and appeared up to date.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Analytical monitoring reviewed and appeared current.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? E ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The outfall was observed and documentation reviewed.
Page 3 of 3