Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20041529 Ver 1_More Info Received_20090323f DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consultants P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388 (910) 695-1043 9 Fax (910) 695-3317 y 20 March 2009 Ms. Tammy L. Hill NC Division of Water Quality 401 Wetlands Unit 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 Raleigh, NC 27604 SUBJECT: SOIL TEST RESULTS FOR SOUTHERN PRODUCTS AND SILICA, INC. Dear Ms. Hill: This letter serves as an addendum to the 2008 Wetland Mitigation and Reclamation Report for Southern Products and Silica, Inc., Hoffman, Richmond County, North Carolina (2008 Report), submitted 6 February 2009. We reported that 3 soil samples were collected from the Mushroom Fan mitigation area and were sent to the North Carolina (NC) Department of Agriculture (NCDA) for analysis. These samples were compared to 2 samples taken from Reference Forest Ecosystem (RFE) # 1. Results from the NCDA Soil Test Report, dated 17 February 2009, are listed in the following table. Table 1. Results from soil sampling analysis on the Mushroom Fan and within Reference Forest Ecosystem (RFE) #1, Southern Products and Silica Company mine, Hoffman, Richmond County, North Carolina. M USHROOM FAN RFE #1 S,W.PLE ID T7F-1 MF-2 F-? RFF.1-1 RF1E1-2 PARAMETER Class mineral mineral mineral N/A N/A pH 5.2 5.0 4.5 N/A N/A Cu index 15 10 15 10 5 Zn index 8 5 5 70 38 Mn index 6 6 8 69 44 P index 7 5 5 21 21 K index 6 5 7 53 52 Base saturation 32.0% 23.0% 19.0% N/A N/A Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting The NCDA report was missing class, pH and base saturation data for the RFE #1 samples and the agronomist comments stated that there was insufficient soil to provide a complete analysis for some samples. All soil boxes were filled in a similar fashion, however, the samples taken from RFE #1 were extremely wet. It is possible that the boxes broke in transit. Results from soil testing in 2002 reported that RFE #1 was organic, with a pH of 3.9 and a base saturation of 33%. In order for the NCDA to make recommendations, we had to choose the "crops" that we are managing. There was no crop category for a wetland restoration site, so we chose "mature hardwood" and "mature pine" as the best fit crops in order to receive soil recommendations from the NCDA. The agronomist's recommendations included application of dolomitic lime (an average of 0.73 ton/acre), monitoring of Cu and Zn levels in the crop and application of a standard range of fertilizers for the chosen crops. The pH of the soil in RFE #I is more acidic than the soil samples taken from the Mushroom Fan, which had pH values of 5.2, 5.0 and 4.5 (Table 1). Also, soil test results from 2002 indicated that the pH of soil in RFE #2 (pH value of 4.3) was also more acidic than the Mushroom Fan samples. The native soils in the wetlands and mining areas onsite are mapped as Johnston mucky loam and Paxville fine sandy loam (Soil Survey of Richmond County, NC, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service 1999). The Johnston soil series has a reaction range of strongly acid to very strongly acid, with a pH range of 4.5 - 5.5 throughout the profile (0 - 62 inches). The Paxville soil series has a reaction range of slightly acid to extremely acid in the A- horizon and strongly acid to extremely acid in the lower horizons, with a pH range of 3.5 - 6.5 in the upper 12 inches and 3.5 - 5.5 below 12 inches (12 - 50 inches) (USDA 1999). The goal of the mitigation area is to restore the Streamhead Atlantic White Cedar Forest and Cypress-Gum Swamp natural communities that occurred here prior to mining. These natural communities typically occur on wet, acidic soils (Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation, Schafale and Weakley 1990). Based on past soil testing results from RFE #1, the characteristics of the native soils and natural communities at this location and the progress of the Mushroom Fan mitigation area towards success, we will not apply dolomitic lime or fertilizers at this time. (Additionally, past soil testing results from RFE #2 are consistent with RFE #1 results and native soil characteristics). Changing the acidic characteristic of the soil may create conditions unsuited to the goals of the mitigation effort. It may reduce the ability for vegetation adapted to the desired natural communities to thrive; meanwhile, it may enhance growing conditions for vegetative species that are not desired. We will continue the Mushroom Fan soil testing schedule in the 5th year of monitoring. Please contact me with any questions or comments regarding this matter. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Jennifer M. Archambault Wildlife Biologist Enclosure: NCDA Soil Test Report, 2/17/2009 CC: Emile B. Hughes - US Army Corps of Engineers Floyd Williams - NC DENR, Land Quality Section Ken Averitte - DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office C.K. Smith - Southern Products and Silica, Inc. Y r C C 6) 7 r N O z cS a? y v° N 4 ? N N N N O o°o o°o 0 V a? 0 0 L N a ? V 0 c G C/1 0. S 'a a3 O V a b a y .a U? N M M n H a 'N 7 a A V A V z 7+ fY. w O O cn z w A Qol? v z z w a 0) a O N v° ? c O G 0 O o o ° 0? m ? o N -o ' i 7C Q ? ? 4 , O ? F ? £ c' f t3. ? b Q ? y V ? o ? 8 ? s0. O L L >, O fs. O 'G O 'Z Ot Ol M M M 2 V i/1 V o V vs a o0 moo N N moo N N N !? vs vs try .n *?. o°o $? o o ?u's a a ^1 p o°o o°o ^1 o°o o? ;zl a ? N y 00 N K= 00 00 r w ° ^ ° O v? 'V ? O N ? O b C S 0.. O O C. L V ^ G.7 0 V b ? ... Ki V .". N o ell v ... N a o b ? C S 0. O p d ? V w p V ? N OG V e M o N ? IC ? b N Z- ;.) ll? N o v M M 3 ? v r C o e? ? :3 y O N a o , 3 h V 0 0 ? LY W M F ? t G . 3 M O y e v z F ? N _ r M M N y z tv ?' '" N v? ?n a v 0 v V ? B O O a B O O b N N 0. N o N oMo O V h 4 h 4 a N Ai o v v ? W ?' ? N C W ? fy N h O i'?+ ai ai C G O rr d u ? C C ? ? C C o c . . 1/1 V 1 V V V V C V V V ce a 0 .y . r V a z V ? . ?. V y +r ^1 O (/? W '_' a ?/ W N y y Z F `? rr iz ? y F `w 4 . . f