20020831 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020521

a 1?
3
k?
'OZ
July 26`x', 2002
NCDENR-DWQ D ?L
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 2 9
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 '
WA i. -,
RE: 401-Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules Compliance
Request Re-submittal
Park at Langston
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project no.: 5968
DWQ Project no.: 020831
Dear Mr. Domey,
On July 16'x', 2002, S&EC received correspondence from NC-DWQ stating that the 401-
Water Quality Certification application and Neuse River Buffer compliance request for
the Park at Langston (DWQ project no.: 020831) had been considered withdrawn by NC-
DWQ. We are hereby resubmitting the 401-Water Quality Certification application and
-io-Neuse River Buffer compliance request, despite the fact that we feel that the application
should have been placed on administrative hold rather than having been considered
withdrawn by NC-DWQ. However, instead of debating this issue, we are resubmitting
the application in order to best serve the interests of our client.
Enclosed are seven copies of the original application as well as seven copies of the site
stonnwater plan drafted by the project engineer.
Please call me if you require any additional information, or email me at
jcooper n,sandec.com.
Si erely,
???iyV i'VIC?C?? ?l.L V
G-?
Kevin Martin Jim Cooper
President Environmental Scientist
OF W ATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
p , William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O G D E kL-:9 L rth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r l
? Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
-1
p r Acting Director
?? - Division of Water Quality
U UL-
--- ------ June 4, 2002
DWQ # 02-0831
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Dear Mr. Cooper:
On May 24, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetlands for the purpose of providing roadway and sewer access
for the residential subdivision in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas.
Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply.
In particular as described in 15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds
on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance l" = 100 feet) so we can
begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 214.0500.
1. Your plans indicate stormwater discharge that will not flow in a diffuse manner through
buffers. Please provide plans and calculations to show that diffuse flow shall be achieved.
2. Please provide table referenced in item # XI.
Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 211 .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer
want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
S
doh Dorney
Wa r Quality Certiftc tion Program
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
William Baker
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
Ph: [phone], Fax: [phone], http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
gI
WAIF
0R Michael F. Easley
\0? pG Governor
Uj 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Certified Mail Return ReceiQt Reauested
Mr. Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Mr. William Barker
1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 166
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Cooper and Mr. Barker:
July 10, 2002
I????oe?n
ui
JUL
CL!
Re: Park at Langston
Wake County
DWQ # 020831
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your response, received June 26, 2002, to our request for
additional information regarding your application for a 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval, received May
24, 2002, for the subject project.
In previous correspondence dated June 4, 2002, this Office requested that you provide plans and calculations
to show that diffuse flow of stormwater would be provided in the Neuse Riparian Buffers in compliance with 15A NCAC 213
.0233 (5). Only one plan page was provided that indicated some kind of level spreader for one of the five listed stormwater
outlets. No calculations were provided to show that this level spreader is adequately sized, and no topographic
information was provided to show that the slopes were adequate to accept the flow. No calculations or (readable) plans
were provided for the other outlets. This information was needed by DWQ in order for us to decide whether this project is
approvable.
Since the requested information was not provided, we are hereby returning the subject application. As such,
this application is withdrawn. Should you decide to reapply you must provide seven copies of an application and
supporting documentation as well as the appropriate fee.
If you have any questions please contact Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 or John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if
you have any questions.
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regional Office
EPA Region IV
Todd St. John
File
Central Files
erely
n limek, PE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
May 24`h, 2002
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Nationwide Permits 12 and 39, 401-Water Quality Certification, and Neuse
River Buffer Rules Compliance Request
Park at Langston
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
UTM coordinates: 703500mE 39, 39750mN
S&EC Project #: 5968
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Jones,
On behalf of William Barker, (property owner), we hereby request authorization from the
US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permits 12 and 39 for the subject project
to cover permanent impacts to stream channels and wetlands. We also request written
concurrence from the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project
complies with the 401-Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Pen-nit 39,
and that it complies with the Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
S&EC performed a Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the site in fall 2000, and a detailed
wetland delineation in April 2002, which was submitted to the USACE for approval on
May 20th, 2002. Data forms for the delineation are attached. NC-DWQ confinned
S&EC's Neuse River Buffer evaluation (NBRRO 01-199-see attached).
The proposed project, which consists of a residential subdivision, is located east of West
Lake Rd. (SRI 387), west of Bells Lake Rd. (SR 1386), approximately one mile south of
Ten-Ten Rd. (SR 1010) near Cary, Wake County, NC. Please refer to the USGS site
map. The property comprises approximately 32 acres, and is in the Neuse River Basin.
Approximately 0.003 acres (1,278 ft. 2) of jurisdictional wetlands and 85 linear ft. of
stream channel will be impacted for a roadway crossing (Impact 1-see impact maps)
under Nationwide Permit 39 (totaling 0.03 acres/85 linear ft.). Approximately 9,983 ft.2
(zone 1: 6,291 ft. 2, zone 2: 3,692 ft.2) of Neuse River Buffer will be impacted by the
proposed roadway crossings (Impact 1). Approximately 0.011 acres (495 11.) of
jurisdictional wetlands and 20 linear ft. of stream channel will be temporarily impacted
under NWP 12 (Impact 2-see impact maps). Total proposed impacts are 0.0411 acres
(0.011 temporary)/ 105 linear ft. (20 ft. temporary).
The Town of Cary originally required two roadway crossings over the channel where
proposed impacts will occur in order to preserve connectivity within the site-despite our
client's wishes-who understood that the two crossings conflicted with avoiding and
minimizing unnecessary impacts to wetlands/waters of the U.S. Thus, William Barker
(our client), S&EC, and a project engineer from CH Engineering met with Bob Zarzecki
of NC-DWQ in January to discuss the crossing requirement. After this meeting, the
project's land planner and engineer were able to convince Cary to drop one of the
required roadway crossings, leaving the one proposed in this application, which is
necessary to access high ground in the northeastern portion of the property. Additionally,
DOT has relaxed the minimum turn radius requirement for the extension of Alphawood
Drive (see impact map) in order to minimize Neuse River buffer impacts.
It is important to note that the road shown entering the site on the northern property line
is not yet constructed, and is a reserved road right-of-way-not a dedicated right-of-way.
Thus, the road right-of-way is still owned by the adjacent site's developer. Additionally,
there is a gas line easement parallel to the northern property line immediately adjacent to
the property.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification. The proposed roadway crossing is necessary in
order to access high ground in the northeastern portion of the property. This road is an
extension of a stubbed road on the western property line. Both the roadway and sewer
line crossing, as evinced by the site plan, have been designed to cross wetland areas and
the stream channel perpendicularly. A large, contiguous bottotnland hardwood forest
wetland in the middle of the property has been completely avoided, as have all other
wetlands/waters of the U.S. onsite.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel
impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel per project. Because the
proposed cumulative impacts resulting from the project total 0.0411 acres (0.011 acres
temporary)/105 linear ft. (20 ft. temporary), project impacts are below the
aforementioned thresholds, and S&EC believes that neither wetland nor stream channel
mitigation should be required
Additionally, NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for buffer impacts if
they do not exceed 1 /3 acre per buffered channel tributary. Because the proposed buffer
impacts resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned threshold
(9,983 ft.2 or 0.229 acres), buffer mitigation should not be required. Because the
proposed sewer line corridor will cross the riparian buffer perpendicularly and is less than

co
sa ?
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Pen-nit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Penn app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/regtour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to detennine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page I of 12
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will detennine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg_pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.htmi. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
if. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: William Barker
Mailing Address: 1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 166
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: (919)-859-0044 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jim Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: (919)-846-5900 Fax Number: (919)-846-9467
E-mail Address: icooRerosandec.com
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires infonnation to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Park at Langston
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only)
N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0679490224
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located east of West
Lake Rd. (SRI 387) west of Bells Lake Rd. (SR 1386), approximately one mile south of Ten-
Ten Rd. (SR 1010) near Cary Wake County NC.
Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 703500i'E 39, 39750111N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct water
body.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The site
is completely forested.
7. Property size (acres): +/-
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Middle Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is provide
roadway and sewer access for a residential subdivision.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy machinery
typically associated with roadway construction and sewer line construction will be used for
this oroiect.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Land use is primarily residential and
forested with patchy agricultural areas nearby.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional detenninations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued pennits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the site in fall 2000, and a detailed
,
wetland delineation in April 2002, which was submitted to the USACE for approval on May 20`11
2002. Data forms for the delineation are attached. NC-DWQ confirmed S&EC's Neuse River
Buffer evaluation (NBRRO 01-199-see attached). No permits or jurisdictional determinations
have been issued for the project at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional pen-nit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional permit requests are anticipated for the project in the future.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, pennanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of' 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream "Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
Impact I (road Fill 0.003 No 0 ft. Headwater Forest
crossing)
Impact 2 (sewer Excavation 0.0011 No 0 ft. Headwater Forest
line crossing)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.041 acres (0.011 temporary impacts for sewer line
crossing)
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
Impact 1 (road Fill 85 ft. UT to Middle Creek 4-6 ft. Intermittent
crossing)
Impact 2 (sewer Excavation 20 ft. UT to Middle Creek 4-6 ft. Intermittent
line crossing)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 105 linear ft. (20 ft.
temporary for sewer line crossing)
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number "Type of Impact* impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)

N/A
Page 6 of' 12
T? List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local storinwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
inforination related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The Town of Cary originally required two roadway crossings over the channel where proposed
impacts will occur in order to preserve connectivity within the site-despite our client's
wishes-who understood that the two crossings conflicted with avoiding and minimizing
unnecessary impacts to wetlands/waters of the U.S. Thus, William Barker (our client), S&EC,
and aproject engineer from CH Engineering met with Bob Zarzecki of NC-DWQ in January to
discuss the crossing requirement. After this meeting the project's land planner and en iineer
were able to convince Cary to drop one of the required roadway crossings, leaving the one
proposed in this application which is necessary to access high ground in the northeastern portion
of the property. Additionally DOT has relaxed the minimum turn radius requirement for the
extension of Alphawood Drive (see impact map) in order to minimize Neuse River buffer
impacts. The proposed road crossing (Impact 1) has been designed to cross the stream channel at
a perpendicular angle to minimize impacts. The proposed sewer line crossing (Impact 2) also
has been designed to cross the stream, wetland area, and buffer perpendicularly to minimize
impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1 .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 7 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Pennits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in detennining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation to offset
unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements for notification.
The proposed roadway crossing is necessary in order to access high gEound in the northeastern
portion of the property. This road is an extension of a stubbed road on the western property line,
and crosses the stream perpendicularly, impacting as little channel as possible. The sewer line
crossing is necessary to provide all portions of the property with sanitary sewer access. A large,
contiguous bottomland hardwood forest wetland in the middle of the property has been
completely avoided, as have all other wetlands/waters of the U.S. onsite.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel impacts
below 1 acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel. Because the proposed cumulative
impacts resulting from the project total 0.0411 acres (0.011 temporary)/ 105 linear ft. (20 ft.
temporary-i.e. less than 1/3 acre and 150 ft.) wetland or stream channel mitigation should not
be required
Page 8 of 12
Additionally NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for buffer impacts if they do
not exceed 1/3 acre per buffered channel tributary. Because the proposed buffer impacts
resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned threshold
(9,983 ft.2 or 0.229 acres) buffer mitigation should not be required. Because the proposed sewer
line corridor will cross the riparian buffer perpendicularly and is less than 40 ft. wide, it is
considered an "exempt" activity by the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules, and should not
require riparian buffer mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
N/A
Page 9 of 12
map, whether or not impacts arc proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Neuse )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 6,291 3.0 N/A
2 3,692 1.5 N/A
Total 9,983 N/A
Zone I extends out 30 tect perpcndficular trom near bank of channel; /.one L extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage on the site is not expected to exceed 30%, therefore, a stormwater_plan
should not be required. However, the site stormwater plan is enclosed with this application.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to an existing sanitary sewer easement
Page 10 of 12
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 21-I .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
0
Applica Agen ' "'ignatt# v Date
(Agents nature is vali4//only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps Of Engineers
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Camden Gates Martin Washington
Carterct* Green Pamlico Wayne
26
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
Page l l of 12
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 12 of 12
Oct 09 01 05:20P SPAULDING&NORRIS, PR [phone]
09/13/2001 17:09 9198469467
fAx, Ta : ? 1 M COWS
S8,EC
PAGE 04
Soil & Etiviro nine ntal Consuivan-ts, YA
11010 Raven ,K108t Road Raleigh, North Cerolink 27614 • rhotre (919) e46-5900 . Fu: (919) R46-9d6-1
w W w,$tutdEC.r0rV
AUFNT AtiTHOR12ATTON FORM
A31 Blanks To Be Filled In S The Current l.andowne
Name: l?? G I Yt'h1 IJ l
Address: --
r? ,&Y, X l?
Pho7ne. n .
Project Naule/ Description:?C
Date: b
The Department of the Army
1J.S. ,&rMy Corps of Er:gineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilm-ington, NC 28402
r
Ann:
Field Office: t
Re: Wetlands Related Consaltitig and Permitting
To Whom It Ivey Corcem:
I, the ca.-renk ro • owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & ExIvirorwnental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the peocessietg of permit applications, to furrvish upon request day Of
supplemental infonnation in support of apphcations, etc, from this day forward, 'I1,e Y
"I hLs notification supersedes eny pre%zous correspondence concerning the agent for this projee -
NOTICE! This au.thnnzation, for liability and professional cotirteily reasons, is valid only for
bovernmeat offidids to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You Should cast S&EC
to axrainge a site meeting prior to vislung the sate.
Prjnt property O xiei's Name
cc: Mr. John Domey
Nc,_DI NR - bWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
R ' 'gh NC 27604
Property Owner s S iViature
cc: Mr, James Coopex
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
P.1
a,ez ,
gjAw office,
S hnf cr S]iCtldS? 9101;0stot, Road
pMB n1, 3020.11'ro5perity Cltvrch Road 3817.1'_ i-Awndele Drive -%y;vrwilk. NC 28681
, NC (`ttulettr, NC 22269 7197 Ph,4t9l (336)5 ) 54021455 rf,on? (B2R) 01-S870
pbont: (704)720-940) Fax: : (3-8234 kaX, [phone]
t=ax: (336)540-8%35
Vw f704)720 _qA1 6
- ; - ? • ???_ I,• USGS SITE 'MAP' t,l
(LAKE WHEELER/APEX QUADS)
\ 'It£j _ril ' ?,SG? ?-- .. /, ? \_?' fit. ?, I / ;/ / _ \i. ?t--• ,?`?Cr\ ' ?tJ /' r ?'J /L ?\ ?I t?, (\J// ?, (, it; r% ?1{r ? ?,i1 tt I? fd?\\I?\\ j `'l?,??..??i.
: ?.,,q,-- .. \ ?. , J ? . , I / - ? : ? ? ((rte %?_ j•
'd' i ?.:. ? ? '? '•. ? : ? ? '45
c ) .
1'i ?/ ! \ ' I \\\ \ •t f `,? . jI! ,eGls • <32
VII
C:- \ , -- -
tit
? t.
'? • ' ?`? ?:: ?`f,?\ '??-\ ? t Wit,, ,,?!?*' '/? 389 J?(. - ? n j - t , ,.-?? j ? _;\ .,? ,? ? - ? _ i
Y t,
/ fJ
..._. '" ? ` ?(` r?-.?- 1 a ? • ?? I . ? o?e I C?c? _} - 1 - /? ??70
%
11 () ?
11
t -
273
\\ •% /' V?:?t ? t' l1\ ' III ? I' ` l,, ?? \ ? / \ ,
IL?J- .,. ?tl ?... -. _.?: ?_ ?• - :`"1 ?.%- .!Iii ,!: ;'i:
WAKE C,ourY7Y, fdr_;RTH CAROU NA ;ii-',ET NUMBER 84
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC lob# 5968) Date: 4/18/02
Applicant/Owner: W T Barker Realty
Investigator: Jim Cooper County: Wake
State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: BLH Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes X No Transect ID: Wetland
Plot ID: flag 277
If needed, explain on reverse.
VF1_1=TAT1nM
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua Shrub FAC+ 11.
4. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 83.3%

Remarks:
uvnoni nr_v
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-
Aerial Photographs Inundated
-
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
-Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: approx. 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: approx. 12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC job# 5968) Plot ID: Wetland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 10 YR 2/2 - -- Sand loam
3-12 Bt 10 YR 5/1 7.5 YR 5/6 Few, prominent Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer i n Sandy Soils
_
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
\l1/GTI A41110 MCTCO\AWAYUNU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _No X Yes _No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes _No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC job# 5968) Date: 4/18/02
Applicant/Owner: W.T. Barker Realty County: Wake
Investigator: Jim Cooper State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine-Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? -Yes X No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes X No Forest
Transect ID: Upland
If needed, explain on reverse. Plot ID: 15 ft. u from fla 277
VFr;FTATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Quercus rubra Tree FACU 9.
2. Quercus alba T/S FACU 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua Shrub FAC+ 11.
4. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 13.
6. Ilex opaca Herb FAC- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 28.6%
Remarks: Ilex opaca is present as small saplings
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
- -Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC job# 5968) Plot ID: Upland
Sn1I S
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: well-drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Kanhapludults Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Conc retions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 10 YR 3/3 -- --- Sand loam
2-5 E 10 YR 4/4 --- -- Sand loam
5-12 Bt 10 YR 4/6 -- --- Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI AAir1C nPIrPPMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? -Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? -Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? -Yes X No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
FROM : CH ENGINEERING PHONE NO. : 9198486761
ENGINEERING
May 23, 2002
To: Jim Cooper, S&EC
From: Maha Chambliiss, PE rv.r9?.,,, (
Re: The Park At Langston. Creek Crossing
May. 23 2002 10:40AM P2
This memo is to confirm that the proposed lots 1 through 20 at Park at Langston, which are located
on proposed Tributary Dr. and north east of the proposed creek crossing are landlocked unless the
extension of Alphawood Dr, is allowed. Proposed Tributary Dr. does not extend past our project.
There is a reserved right-of-way and not a dedicated right-of-way north of the termination of
Tributary Dr. on our site. Please be advised that a reserved right-of-way means that the Ownership
of this particular right-of way is still held by the original developer. ,Also, there is a 50 ft. Colonial
Pipe line right-of-way carrying three major gas transmission lines within the reserved right-of-way.
The extension of Alphawood Dr. will be the only means of accessing the area north east of the
proposed creek crossing.
If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to let me know.
232
¦ PO Box 3o128, Raleigh, NC 27622 0 TEL [phone] - Fax [phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
August 15, 2001
Jim Cooper
S & E C, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, N. C. 27614
2 ?001
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules i _
NBRRO 01-199
The Park at Langston
S & E C Project #01-5968
Wake County
Dear Mr. Cooper:
This letter is being sent to serve as confirmation of your buffer determination at the project referenced by
the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 01-199. The features represented on the Wake County Soils and
the USGS Lake Wheeler and Apex Quad maps were evaluated to determine their subjectivity to the Neuse
Buffer Rule on July 2, 2001. It was determined that there a total of five features depicted on the property
on the two maps. Three features are subject to riparian buffer protection and are labeled as A, B, and C on
the plat map received August 10, 2001.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233
(NCAC 0233). For information on wetlands and other impacts, please contact someone at the Central Office
at 733-1786. Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be. of any assistance or if you
have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
4 Sin rely,
Steve Mitchell
Environmental Scientist
cc: RRO/John Dorney
Wake County
f
..........
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
fl:\iibrlet. for\neuse.buf\buf'01 \l angston.199
0
r
Ln
W
W
O
Ln
w
r
O
O
w
O
O
O
03
0l
it,
ru
r
Ct3
Cr3
r
K
I
7^.
l JJ
V
I
0
5
0
C
w
.117
0-0
0
? m -i
37 0
nM
m

N
0
F
so
m
?M
o
oz
`lm?;
m
_z-4
0DFr
C)0
(D rnm0
a 0 Z
N
gc
>
z
CO)
D
o?
w
ql
69

* N N

? O p

* O
N
O
p O
O
00

c

W
D
ag
Aug 27 03 03:17p Spangler Environmental 9195460757
69
SPAN LER
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
FACSIMILE
Date
012?:7103
To 11?b ZCi,r?
Company 00D W Q
? R?IT-
Project Number
From Di m lct 6?_ft JEsq• Vi J m?
Fax -733^6813
Total Number of Pagcs Including this Cover Sheet Z.
o-n +M-Lo
p.1
f l.- vim, >I?/t r, ?o?,?): w clc.,n?c a4, i» "? ?
ft rm??
z
CAn nod' ?el bt;&I+ i h ?oyeiwh Y' 260 !''/o?" A ail Qp?2?CA
yY1?eKr2 , ?. ??elievt - ? ? Ur1?'"vt ? ??c},rwc?
For Questions or Problems Regarding this Fax, Please Call _
The attached fax message contains information that may be confidential, be protected by
the attorney-client or other applicaole privileges, or constitute non-public information.
It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not a:`,
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying BY TOI,_. FRF,F CALL
1-866-772-6453 and then RETURN iT VIA US MATT, POST-PAID. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction a ttis message by unintended recipients is not authorized
and may be unlawful.
Land Planning • Permitting • 1?mironmental Consulting • Constriction MwWetlient • Expert Testimony
Pose (Alice Box 387 Raleigh, NC 27602-0387 tel: [phone],51 fax: [phone] N"vw.dip;uiglerl:uvii-oianaci?tal.(-oin
Aug 27 03 03:17p Spangler Environmental
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
- 1? - -- County
Spa"Adu?b
? {Um r `PA.
VERSUS
TOLC f A..k cJt` l..aw.Z? , Q?uc .
-questing Subpoena
terp/aintiff F-1 Defendant ? Other (specify)
Te O! Person subpoenaed
R ". ' 7i:.r-_? - p,-
Name
9195460757 p.2
File No.
--Q2,-cv5 y?qq -
In The Gen ral Court Of Justice
? District DiOuperior Court Division
Additional File
SUBPOENA
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 45
(Note: A single subpoena may be used for as many
as three persons if all have the same address. /f
documents are subpoenaed, only one person may be
Nafne Of Third Person Subpoenae named.)
Ne "D We (?
Address -- - Alternate Address -_--
v32i Cr_wblfm lv
City, State, Zip-? Telephone No. City, State, Zip - Telephone No.
YOU ARE COMMANDED TO:
fct k all that apply):
appear and testify, in the above entitled action, before the court at the place, date and time indicated below.
produce for the court the following items, at the place, date and time indicated below.
Name And l.ocahon Of Court Date To Appear/Produce ?v
O - e • `-t . Q3 - and until released by the Court.
? i Qt?MMa-y n (?tT111Tv
7ime To Anpear/P: Appear/Produce
AM l-?P x,,
M
Nv And Address Of Applicant's r tomcy - Date--
c)
Srgnaturc
J 4rGr? N L 7i'7-to J ?'" __ I --7
Telephone No. ?j? Deputy, C f L As a t CSC
- _ - ? Clerk Of Superior Court
E931 6CJ`/ 67 ? n Magistrate Attorney ? Party
AOC G-100, Rev. 3/98
'0 1998 Administrative Office of the COMM (Please See Reverse Side)
.YrLC {I. v
Facility Name' Park at Langston Oversized
Project Number 02 0831 i? ?.F
Sox 9 Downstairs
r
Y ?T
x, t # Project T 1
r . ype!4purpose of residential , ? County .Wake
Y
Location UT to Middle Creel. Car ti 4 County2
F
w . ;Received From APl a ., COE ID Raleigh
Region,
Received Date May 24, 2002 V, COE Susp Date;, Reg. Contact'
?- .•f',l x,61 a R^^4Trra4 '1;E 7 y yr
Sent to Region Date DCM Susp Dater
Rcvd Region Date TIP Number Payment Date 7/29/2002
Last Action Date August 12, 2002 More Info Requested Amount Paid 9
Last Action Issue General More Info Received 1,7/29/2002 Paydr S & EC
atitude (ddmmss) `? Mitigation 7 ? Check 15733
ongltude (ddmmss) COC Received Date
Cart # Wetland Wetland Score Stream
a pe lenpact Index
MY ON
MY ON
Stream Ar'
Class
--r--r- Subb sin W6:nd' ( Rey
Min, Suou: Gla s
030403 1 ri,
Ar a" L;ohbth Leh9th
(ae s) (fret) (feet)
! Ap .r:: Req.. 'Appr.
W10 Mitiga Ion
project Wetland Wetland Area Length Compl tlon
Number Type - Class (aor`es) (feet) pat 7Subbasin
§ an- ;Inter-,

W A T ?RQG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
MEMO
DATE: January 28, 2002
TO: John Dorney
FROM: Bob Zarzecki, ESIII
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
[phone]
RE: Park at Langston S/D
John,
Please review the attached plan. They are required by Wake Co. to put in Crossing "A" and by the Town of Cary to put in Crossing
"B". The Town has written a letter referencing their new (?) connectivity ordinance. They have redesigned from the original
alignments to the proposed alignments per S&EC's recommendations. The proposed alignments have less stream impact because they
cross at straight sections of the stream and not meandering sections. Jim with S&EC said the stream being crossed is an intermittent
stream. The stream is on the soil survey but not USGS. Mitchell has confirmed buffers but no perennial calls. Total impacts for both
crossings will be kept below 150 feet. They told me that they're looking like 50 feet and 60 feet, but couldn't make any promises.
Please review the attached information and let me know if you have any immediate objections. They'll be sending in a PCN most
likely this week.
Thanks,
Bob
C ?9; I v?) v I
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Subject: FW: Park @ Langston SID
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:18:50 -0500
From: "Jim Cooper" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Bob
Thanks for the quick reply. I'm planning on going ahead and sending in
the application as soon as I get impact maps in from the engineer (which
hasn't really been resolved yet)-hopefully by Friday.
Thanks again for meeting with us, and sorry we lingered about so long!
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 5:01 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Park @ Langston SID
Jim,
John's first reaction was to avoid the larger crossing (the one you did
not know the name of) and cul-de-sac both ends. I told him that this
crossing was required by both the County and Cary. I would recommend
sending the PCN in as soon as possible to get the review process
started. We may want to get all parties involved to meet, but go ahead
and send it in so we can get started.
- Bob
fol
v
?Z??
O?O? W A T ?RPG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
F # 919 733 6893
Fax To:
Company:
Date: 8 /i Z k z
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
ax - -
\I
Fax #:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands
0? K, WAT ?9pG
r
> -1
O `r
August 12, 2002
DWQ# 02-0831
Wake County
Mr. William Barker
1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 166
Raleigh, NC, 27607
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Barker:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 0.041 acre of wetlands and 105 linear feet of
intermittent streams and to impact 9,983 square feet of protected Neuse Buffers in order to construct road and sewerline crossings
associated with the Park at Langston subdivision in Wake County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water
Quality on May 24, 2002, and in additional correspondence received June 26 2002, July 18 2002 and July 29, 2002. After reviewing your
application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3374 and 3362, which can be
downloaded from our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers
12 and 39 when issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must
notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner
must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification as well as the additional conditions
listed below:
1. An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream
buffers;
2. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters or areas within
50 feet of all streams and ponds. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of
the 404 Permit (whichever is later). A sample deed notification format can be downloaded from the 401 /Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands .
3. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification
has been completed.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 6714, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please call Steve Mitchell or Debbie Edwards in our Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central
Office at 919-733-9721. Questions regarding stormwater should be directed to Todd St. John at 919-733-9584.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
. 04
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
1
1
1

oZ
WER kf,,77
WATt:ii (?,
L
The Park at Langston
Wake County, NC
Drainage and Erosion Control Calculations
Submitted by CH Engineering
4601 Lake Boone Trail
Raleigh, NC
919-788-0224
8E30AI.46
1 '0

Contents
Nitrogen Loading Calculations 1 -3
Stormwater Management Storage Calculations 4-5
Storm Pipe Calculations 6-7
Henderson Rd Pipe system (Pipe 12-1) 8-11
Henderson Rd Pipe 7 -6 12 - 17
Henderson Rd Pipe 2 18-20
Alphawood Dr Pipe 3 21 - 22
Tributary Dr Pipe System (pipe 4) 23 - 27
Optimist Ridge Pipe 9-10 28 - 29
Level Spreaders 30
Roadway Ditches 31- 51
GI Analysis 52-56
Trapezoidal ditches 57 - 61
Details 62
Sediment Trap designs 63 - 73
Maps 74 - 78
waxy )AX Svr page: 008- j kc Pa.k ,fit L0.?S}O
rr Part 1. Rlparlan Buffers
Area includes npanan biaffem'? (l ?dc KYes [ ]Exe'",p.
if yes, 50 foot !K 100 foot
' River Basin? ANeuse (I Cape pear
Basis for exemption._- _______..._--_--_,_--__ __---
Show buffers on site plan.
Part It. Nitrogen Calculations (Method 1, Appendix C):
a. Subdivision infoflnaton:
Number of lots Average house size
Number of lots/ acre _ t • 31;? Amount of Right-of-Way
Total area of lots (excluding __ s L. y Z W' Percent of Right-cf-Way
R/W and cpen soace) 18. 8 2. A e- that is impervious area
Average lot size - ll 1i ? s Total estimated Impervious area
:_1 b. Y 17

q2.-Js SF
3- Q Ac
S ?_ ?_
b. Pre-development losding: TN export

Type & Land Cover Area TN export coeff. from use
(acres) (lbs/ac/yr) (Ibs/yr)
Permanently protected undisturbed open space ; .
(forest, unmown meadow) 32 2 i q .4 s'
Permanently protected managed open spare _
(grass, landscaping etc.)
r 1.20
Impervious Area p 21.20
TOTA'_ q
Nitrogen Loading Pate (Ibs/ac/yr) = _ o • 6 _
c. Post-development loadin.

Type of Land Covet
Permanently protected undisturbed open space
(forest, unmown meadow)
Permanently protected rnanaged opera space
(grass, landscap lag etc.)
Right-of-Way (read TN export from Gmpht)
Lots (read TN export from Graph ?)
-DOTAL
TN export
Area TN export coeff. from use
(acres) (Ibs/ac/yr) (Ibslyr)

/o-20 0.60
1.2A -l
3•ti z 1. 2.
q

Nitrogen Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) = ._ 2 • 4/ E
Nitrogen Load after HMPs = _ N 14-
Nitrogen Load Offset by Payments =
Net change In on-site N Load =
Part Nl. Control of peak cStormwater Flow
Calculated Pre-development Peak rlae/ _ Q_1 D r_Vs
CalcUated Post-development Peak rlow_ C1L_2
I, the undersigned, certlfv to the best of my knawledge that the above information is Correct (afflK seal),
CA
0
a ?,, ?OQoQOE Pa-r
o •
g,
140 40
PlE??°\ c*'
S
nr,,yiCoeoF?Gl
,AOO CHAMP'' p'011
°'ejaenseaae?60° 6 02
I
1 Graphs for use with Method 9: Residential Sites with no known building footprints.

Graph 1: "dotal Nkrogen Export from Right-of-Way
z
4

t
L 20,0
15.0
$ WO
s?
z
5,C,
20% 40% 60% 80% -100% 120%
Percentage of FUght-of Way that is Pavement
0..0
GO/

Graph 2: Total Nitragevi Export from tarts
Total Nitrogen Export frrorn LAAs
I 2.00
to,07
r ?i.?(1
e'?T
W
zoo
U.:d(e
ar `1 l z R 2 i4 16 1 tcl 20 22 24 26 28
Wumb4r of Lk*iHng units per Acre

1Year storm quantity Calculations

Pre Development 0.80 cfs
Post Development 1.80 cfs
difference 1.00 cfs Retain this amount during the 24 hour 1 year storm

J,

Total Detained on site
Pipe 1 Henderson Road 0.15 cfs (from chainsaw routing)
BMP Tributary 0.25 cfs
Trapezoidal Ditch Lots 13-15 0.10 cfs
Trapezoidal Ditch Lots 11-12 0.20 cfs
Trapezoidal Ditch Lots 12-13 0.10 cfs
Trapezoidal Ditch Lots 23-26 0.10 cfs
BMP Optimist Ridge 0.10 cfs
1.00 cfs
Total 1 year post development flow 0.80 cfs

n

t

r

E
7
CU
a
d
VJ
0
m N + N t CD LO
m •a 0 0 D
W y w w w w w
0

V O
Cn O
O C)
"t O
O N
Cn O
LO N O
O O
O T
CD M
C) r
m 0
N 0
N
>
C r
M O
C co O
m i
c
m l
C 6 r LCj 4
LO 6
LO
7 Cl) m C m co 7 M CY) co c
o M
O O O O LO 0) 0 0
CL UP M O Lq N Ln 0 0
F- O COD I- Ln CND O LO LO
M co co co M co co M
0 (/? (/? ? m w N w , * - N "t ?
~ w-
L U- LLLL M
U-
UL
C7
C7
?
C7
?
?
a 0 0 0 ? 0 (O O N O OO d' 0 0 0
0 LO m 0 O r? m N 0 't m 0 N N
FJ5 O O r r O T O T O T M r M M
a g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
J N CCo COO ? O CC0 to 00 CD i N ? O O

r 0 00 0 N 0 0 0 0 M LO r N O
N M Cn d O Cn O O O In T N "?t U CLQ
>
C N
LO M
N r-
co 0
f-
LO ?t
In u)
In 0
? C)
I-
Cn c
CD f)
CD ?}
CD Cn
Cn
M M M -
M M M M M M M CO M M M
CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cl Uf O M O O O CA N O Lf? CA Lr?
0

I- CD

Lo

N

COD

f)

U)

ti

?

C ND

co

LO
co
LO
00
in
M M M M M M M M M M M M
E N Lo N 't w V) r - M M
LL C7 g 1: 0 0 C3 g ?- C7 ? g
a a V a a a a cL a- cL CL a lZ
0 0 CU pC (.) 2 () 0 0 0 U U U v
> U
N_ Cr Er _ cc: (,) cc cc cr X CC CC CC IL Cc
CD 00 CO qt CD 00 00 q QO co CD co N 00
M r N N M r r N r CO M M r
a r N M ?t In CO I? O 0
T -
T N CM 11 In
r r r r

t
t p,,??s-rotil
?•AiZVC )J,7
APPENDIX C
SHEET 1 OF 8
I
i

? o
o?
t
1 0
II ? ?

Q?0
T

v ?
O

2
CHART C 200.1
i
i
V,
r.
APPENDIX C
SHEET 3 OF 8
i `-k
E xtir.?PL
G ! VEN :
NYDROLDGJC CONTOUR 5.0
ORRINRGE 19RER 35 RC.
5AM L RRER FULL 3V5JNE 55
RN5WER
010=s9 x1.4=54.&OF.s
4
Q<
15
0.5
w ?w WW
v
ccX"
2,000
./,a00
,800
600
400
200
?80 .
? (00
Po
?o
8 ?
?D
I ADO
6 00
aoo
1
-6200
1,00
50 (1)
40 LL;
20
Qzz
W~
O
W?
c_
FOR Y pEVEIRORP?CNT
FRGTORS FOR FREQ4(ENCIE5
Q 5 CURVE VMUE X .75
G123 n X %.35
g a X •8
Q/00 r rr x ?, !5
4
2
i
5 ?
O.
RUNOFF FROM UR BAN RRE85
NORTH cRRoL111rR s7 rE HMMY COMW15510N
c 200.3
?c( 4 I'S
CHART C 200.3
7

16 0 10,000
16 8 0,000
156 6,000
144 5,000
4,000
132
3,000
120
2,000
106

96

Exhibit 11
EXAMPLE
D•42 Inch" (3.5 feet)
0.120 cfs
hi x Hw
D fort
(1) 2.5 0.!
(2) 2.1 7.4
(3) 2.2 7.7
OD In foot

(3)
0
1,000
' eoo
84
600
500
72 400
N
= 300+/ \ 11, ..
Z N
Z 60 v 200 UJI 1.5
Z /
0 54 a
> cc 80
.J Q
n _
V 42 V 60
U. W
_ N 5 y-SCALE` I ENTRANCE 1 -1.0
' 0
40 D TYPE lir
W --
H 30 (I) Sgrare edge wit 49 .9
3t .9
4 33 Madrall
:
E
W
0 20 (2)) Groove and with
'?30 - Madrall
(3) Groove end
27 projecting
10 ---- 1 --- --.._._ ..
24
6 To use scale (2) or (3) project
2 1 5 horizontally to Scala (1),thon
4 uu stralght Inclined line through
' D and 0 scales, or reverse as
3 illustrated.
18
2
15
1.0
'
12 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
HEADWATER SCALES 2153 CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
REVISED MAY 1964 WITH INLET CONTROL
BUREAU OF h/RLIC ROAD! JAN. I963
VI-11 <-_? \.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N

Q y S' r
W W

`
W

W
J
W
c
( .
W W
Z f
W ~ N > LLJ
GV
Z?
W
T
l1
'r

.
N 1n
. M Ut
r/1
= N N N t,t
? 0 0 6
J
Z a 1 t•t
0 o
W" 0
Q
s

?N 5
N
N
0
?

=

N

N

0
LL
0 O r 0 9? 0 0 0
V
V
W

O 0
? f

V

cy
vi (,4

v
0
0 s .
D. .,i
J to W `.1 sr? tiff
? ? "? ill .•" .l a ,?

WOZ
?- Z O
o

oz Z
ca o
Z .
N Z
N S _r

J
`7 0

n'
?t
`J
n
r
(?1
Vi
J ,.
cr
?.x
N
ti
?r

ED \ -?' oPs I
NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
flow Q in cfs : 31 Flow depth (ft) = 1.77
slope S in %: 0.5 Outlet velocity (fps) = 7.119
pipe diameter D in in.: 36
Manning number n : 0.013
Pipe diameter (ft) 3.00
Outlet velocity (fps) 7.12
Apron length (ft) 18.00
AVG DIAM STONE THICKNESS
(inches) CLASS (inches)
3 A 9
6 1?3 22
13 Bor1 22
23 2 27
EriRlDGi!lE=T<
BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
' 1 -800-344-210 2
GiZC7SS L -
l
1 -o

? C?.';j Y' r YI ? (w

I; Co ? kpE ('
NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
flow Q in cfs : 11.3 Flow depth (ft) = 0.74
slope S in %: 4.8 Outlet velocity (fps) = 12.980
pipe diameter D in in.: 18
Manning number n : 0.013
Pipe diameter (ft) 1.50
Outlet velocity (fps) 12.98
Apron length (ft) 9.00
AVG DIAM
(inches)
STONE
CLASS
A
B
Bor1
2
THICKNESS
(inches)
3
6
13
23
9
22
22
27
i
d
N
C
n
Q
m
c
0
E

g
8
g
8
g E
N E
F
8
8
8

EL F
? c
C 8 N
C !!1
m Z
W
U ¢
c
m
c
ai ai
ai
°oo°)$
O °o°om
O CU O og<'go°o
N O O ooo°o
O .-- CM 8
0 0 0
d
y II II
IR II ;

S
O II II 11
U D .? II N
It 11 > II 11

d II d
?
N II II

II
N
Z
U N O U O Z O U i J
3 J

0 IL LL
ro U
? 588`° o
o<d 0o°
N M O O
$$0
N
d
FSO
? ° rn ? a?

Y Q
a 5 5
A C C _
d _
m
o ua
c C-) v d
N S S
O
O 8
O O S
O
p
C N ri ?I y up II
?
m 11

? y
J II
S
¢ S y
II

Z ? o S
La
? d
?N 11
Z ° d 0 O
? to
m N j In

q.m
d
9 n n u
A n n
?
CL In (Z
Ero 2
?
`
`o
?
?? °
n 5' U
°
a
a
01 at- u ?
r.
I nl zMaaa >

S8S88S88SSS888888S8SSSSS88
?
N o o d 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 d d d o o d d d d o 0 0 0
3 d
S8S88S8°o°o °oS888888999OS°OS888
n o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

88888S8S88SsssoooaooB?Sooo

? 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o
8S888o°888SS8S88S8°08888888$
?1 ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

S S S S S S S O S S S S S S S S S S S S O S S 8 0 8
u
v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

R
ogg?°o°o$So°S8g?g8°oSggS8C°
C
3
d
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
?

O y (? y 1? 8O 8088 ppNppS 0??upp1II N 1 W N ASPyyI Iyy ^+yyyy O'S aNa )pampap
O O O O S S
S S S
9 0
0
rl O
0 0 0 6 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0

58888 NN 1vN 0hpO?2 IA n N 0((3O

N N a N N I^ N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O
O
O O O O O O

ggoo6NVm`?n°?3°? 8°ad?v?mv
o N tg CR
O O O O O O O C
N m v IA O N w O f2 o7 In n Oi m 10
?- ? N N
Q
oz
S S O S S O 000000 ? S000000? ?? N
0?
€ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0
p p p p p p p
S II? S O 8 I(?1 S N S N S O 5 O 8 N 8? S O S IU S O S IA
41 5 O O ? .- N N t'1 t`O V N If) fD O 1? f? Cp ID pj pj O O ? ? N N

X
c
d
m
N
C
U
1

I

N 8888888888888SS888SSS888
0 0 0 0
0
0
?
3 0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
888°08°08888888588°oo°0888858
d d d d d d d d d

3 d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
O "
8 °0 8 Oo 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 °0 8
y? d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
888 °0888888S8S888o°08888888
o
r 0 0 0 0 o d d 6 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 6 d d 6 d d d
v
Q
^ 8888885888888S888S8S88S8
3
d? d d d d d d d d d d d d d ci d d d d d d d d d d

'? d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
9 ?8nnnnwomcg2M
9^ d d d d d d d d d o o d d d d d d o o d d d o 0
?°CC? .
o ao8
(
o
lj? '8q CRo?It 't
a. N
.
a}
o
pp
t
a
p
N t7 c7 oni Od ? a N Vi vni tp 10 tn0 n n ? m ? ano 001 m Oi Oi o

r?
1nlnlo?nnaowrnrnrnoop 0ooooornmmaoco
N N N N N N N N N
O? O O O
O C O O O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

pp oo p p po p p p pp p pp p Q p p p pp pp p pp
S N O N S IA O N O IA S tt) S 1A O N O 1n 8 N S 1A S 1t)
C c'i t7 d d Vi Ili (2 tO n 1? m aD 01 01 ON O

. .- .- N N
N N N N N

E
F

Calculate the stage-storage function for the detention system
Contour
feet
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
Stage
feet
0.00
Average
Rectangular Basin Contour Contour
Dimensions Area Area
Incremental Accumulated
Contour Contour Estimated
Volume Volume Stage
C C feet

0.00
24.6 24.6 0.27
61.6 86.1 0.77
19.1 105.3 0.91
54.2 159.5 1.29
44.7 204.2 1.59
47.9 252.1 1.90
38.3 290.4 2.13
28.7 319.1 2.31
0.31 0.38 0.19
0.63 1.33 0.85
0.94 1.62 1.47
1.25 2.45 2.04
1.56 3.14 2.80
1.88 3.88 3.51
2.19 4.47 4.17
2.50 4.91 4.69
KS = 117.3
b = 1.1957
Enter Ks and b values from the graph of storage vs. stage shown on the next page
Ks = Constant of power equation
b = Exponent of power equation
400.00
350.00
300.00
250.00
200.00
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
Storage vs. Stage
Y= 1`173x'"'
R' = 0.9788
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
1 OF 1
7/19/2002

N
E
0
CD (D r N I? M M f?
? T of ?
? N (O r- u7 co N
E
a)
U
C
OOOO C)
°O E
O O CO r- CO U) N *- d r
> d cD 6 6 d' N O 6
N M O U') O M M r
r N N N Cl)
'FO O
O R _ ` a)
c L
co Q O N
E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p N L Z o 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6
O c N
Z 2 0 j
c
cts
O
M M O Co U) f-
d Lo - NU)NOMO
c ?n Oi ? N O Oi
O N W O 0 O C!) M .-
r N N N CO
wwMNO V Wr--
N M C'7 CL) Ct 00 ,? M
QO-rNC7M '-ZT It
U? U) r M
N CO 0
QONclU? (Pr-? M9
0000000-
a) 0) - r :-
U)OU?OCnOlf)O
N O CL ?N0r? 0N0 rl_ O
O N ,t Q_ of -NMLO COr?MO
) ? O a O O O O O O O r
a) a) CL.C-J p m
d. d. Cu Z .?
d. mMwMmwMNo
U M 0 0 0 r .- N N
O
U
A
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

APPENDIX C
r+? ?rrr n i-.r n
rk'? C, Z A

EXFrIrl PL
(51 VA'v /000
NYDROLOVC CONTOUR S. D [4
ORRINRGE RRER 35 Rc
SMRL L RRER FULL BU51NE 55 00
RN5 WER Q !0 = 39 X 1.4 = 54. (0 OF.5 O° 4,00
00
, o00 77
j ?
? 8 -? 200
v 1
Q T
-7
Mgo goo
s 6o
0 3 ~ ~? 50
2O 3a
15 ?, <? ?O o 20
/.0 _
?'• UN v
V Q? Q? ? ? ? w
LAI
Stz
CA
O
GURYE 6VC E ON
FOR DEVELOP NT
FRC7'OR5 FOR FREQUENCIES 1 t
Q 5 CURit 8 VE MWE X ,; 075
925 n x 1.35
GZ/OOO u a X L-85
rr X L ?
RUNOFF FROM URBAN RRER5
NORM CRROU R
s,/ ?.? G 20rE NrGxWRy con?M1055IoN?3
clf?N

CHART C 200.3
E RIDGE?TEK
BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
1 -800-344-210 2
A' Z 3 caG
J.. ? ?.. ?._°? c. ZS C.r??..,?. • ?J rte, '..??-. .
L I i.1
? C>.CJ?-1u :1iz
Z
A?s
_ _ -7. z z icy Y-04-,r
Q= GSA,
L a1 C? ? co r C) I es
Z 5 Year

1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
E-Z?> Z P e: 2
NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
flow Q in cfs : 9.96 Flow depth (ft) = 0.69
slope S in %: 4.8 Outlet velocity (fps) = 12.576
pipe diameter D in in.: 18
Manning number n : 0.013
Pipe diameter (ft) 1.50
Outlet velocity (fps) 12.58
Apron length (ft) 9.00
AVG DIAM STONE THICKNESS
(inches) CLASS (inches)
3 A 9
6 B 22 «
13 Bor1 22
23 2 27

JOB NO.
` Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA SHEET OF
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] DATE
www.SandEC.com
JOB NAME
_
SUBJECT
BY
,
,
„
----------------------- ------ ------------
,
}
,
----------- -------------
:
i %_ s
r
,
„
{
,
,
%
;
,
-----------
?_.._._.----
---- .._ ._
1
-------------
,?v Diu aF Pr---- _ _ _,_ ? ....... ? .
AP
,
„
,
,
,
„
T. Fig (k)A725
F? •
------------
- ' --
;
„
,
---------- -----------
%
---------- ------------------------- ------- ---------
,
66Q
f,
,
/t7db? ' - %D f oY1oR?? - ?9T?
C / N d?U U
•
1
- --------------- --------
-
---------
------------- %
7_
,
E .... ,s .
-
--- - ------- ---- --- -- ---- ------
,
- - . ................
f
. .
-------------------- ------ -------- ----------------- --- ---
------------------------- --------
.
I
- - - - - - - --- -- - -- --- - ........
------------ - -
-T---1-- '--F- .{----
-- -- - ---- - ------------ -- ------
-i
--------- --- --- ------------ ------------------- -------- --------------- ---------------------------- ------------
.
•
%
.
,
__.---- .
,
,
----------- ------ -------
--------------- ------- --
,
,
, f-
i - 'i'- -f-- -h- •i° t
,
I I
.
-"'-----'-'---- ?----..._: - 1----1---' --'-L'--L.--- 1------"'1-°'J"-'-1----'-- "L-'°1""'L..'°
t

NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
flow Q in cfs : 72 Flow depth (ft) = 2.33
slope S in %: 1.3 Outlet velocity (fps) = 12.240
pipe diameter D in in.: 36
Manning number n : 0.013
Pipe diameter (ft) 3.00
Outlet velocity (fps) 12.24
Apron length (ft) 24.00
AVG DIAM STONE THICKNESS
(inches) CLASS (inches)
3 A 9
6 B 22
13 Bor1 22
23 2 27
t
w
i

t-'i PC-- e4 A . -7.
APPENDIX C
SHEET 3 OF 8
E YFr?'?I PL c
G 1 vEN :
.11YDROL06TIC CONTOUR 5.0
MHL LN AREA FULL BU51ME 55
S INER
010=39x/4=54.6aF. .5
8
cc? -7
p -1E,?gM'°LE
0.5
w ?w
w?
V
FOR v DE?ELOP?ENT
7, 000
?aoo
800
600
1400
200
-F80
-- 60

20
V

8. tr
/o
4
2
/
Fi9CTOR5 FOR FREQUENCIE5
75
(stQ 0 CURVE YRLUE X /.75
x
G?$$ZO ?r n /.35
QlOO rr R X ?•8?
n X !
??oo
? 00
Qoo
J..
-- 000
t
/00
50 n
40 ,y
20
-5
P
RZINOFF FROM URBAN 9RE85
IVOR771 CRROLI/YR 5 WE NIGH1rYRY COMM15510N
URN, / ?.9 G 200.3

CHART C 200.3

Exhibit 11

ISO 10,000
168 8,000 EXAMPLE ( 1) (2) (3)

136
-6,000 D•42 Inches (3.5 toot)
s,ooo 0.120 cts 6.

3

144 .

4,000 mw 6. s.
132 o too
3,000
s.
4
(1) t.s e.e 4,
120 (2) 2.1 7.4
000
2 4
,
(3) 2.2 7.7 .
3
lee
eD IN feet •
3.
96 1,000 3.
800
--
-•
--
84 600 2' 2
/
300
72 400 / e 2.
300 - -- --1.3 Cl>
Z N

= 60 v 200 I.s
Z W
e 34
1
-
- I

W
W
100 7
=
J 48 / 80

a x
v
U. /Q V
in 60 _
50
A
ENT
E I W
0 1.0 1.0
C o R
NC
MW SCALE
40 D
m 10
TYPE
W
~
W 36

30 _

(1), Saaors edge with

3 9

9

headwall 9
33
' C
a
20
Groeve end with
(2)
a
W
C 30 ' headwall = .8 .9
(3) Groove and •6
27 projecting
J
!
- --------___. -___
10 - ___ __ T-
2y .7
6 To use scale (2) or (3) project
- 21 3 horizontally to awls (i), theft
4 use straight Inclined line through
D and 0 scales, or reverse as 6 6
?' 3 illustrated. .
le
2
13
.3

.3
-.5
3
1.0
LIZ HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
CONCRE TE PIPE CULVERTS
HEADWATER SCALES 293
REVISED MAY 1964 WITH INLET CONTROL (,?_?,
SURE" OF ?UeIIC ROAD ! JAIL Iff!

s
r
r
i
i
ID
N
8
A
a
E
d
I
8
s
8.
R
g E
ui
f F
g
8
8

0 0 0 0
N R N o
? o
R 8 0
(4?) Mold
J ?
a~?
m
O1 g r
C? N
2
m 0
CD

O L ? C C ? m? O N
S°85
O' m 0 W O 058
? N O?
m SSS
?^ m
m 555
0 0 0
t
II ? ?
y „ II II II yyII ? II m ? `I II II II
R Z O N O U O Z O U S 3 J N U 3 J N U
m d LL
LL LL
co U d v U ?
oo C ?
O N O O O I
N N N
O
C
ttl O ? ? yJ rJ
co ? Y LL C C
$ o
a m Co
U E
N5N pp??S 8
O N O N M ci yys ci ..
? m J N N ? ? II IpI
Q .. .. r « ?t? II ?; `U
as n 01 0 0
z U)
?win0
0 ID 13 11
tLiaa0or kdo 9,2 SF3 Uzf 0- >o
58888SS8S8S888SSS88$888888
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
$8$8S8So88oo8888$S8$gSS888
`?
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
85558888888°08880ooooob"b'b"`3o

O? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 o c c o 0 6 0 0

8
8
5
8
8
°0
°0
99 °555888588858888
O O .
O
O
O
O
O
O
G O O O O O O O O G G O 0 0 0 0 0

88888888888888888588588888
66
° .
d .. d o 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 o d d d d d o o d

cc
885SSSSS8585SSSSS88858888
8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0

Q
((??
S S S S O S S S S S 5 8 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OS q q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ut
O
8888880008"982as
8088 '21V ;l ?2
F o?
moonn mm

S S O O N -q W N S V N f7 V m N W aD N O V o? N S 10 lr0
O O O O G G O O fV f`7 •t In 10 fU ("1 tG CG O N (V
N N N N m

o s
S S S S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ N a m v
30 ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O G O 0 0 0
8°8588898585?85389588°SSSSi85
C O O cV (V 6 of v v 6 6 6 t0 I? n a6 6 of 6 O o . N (V

J
X
N
t
U

r

888888885888888888885888
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0,0,0,0,
S588888888000°88
888885°o
.
..
3 ,
0 0 0 0 0 0
00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000
008 acs Aso W00WWww0www8r00
g? o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
S g g$ g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g?? g g g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
°0 8 8 0° °0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 °o °o °0 8 8 8 8
t)
d
N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
?
8888888888°0°0888885588885
4? _
` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
N v
Q
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
}sO X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

N
O n O O N M 1n 1O ci W O1 O N
O N O O N V N
N N N c7 f9 f7 M O'1 0] P1 c?
a s a
N c
? N
V

y

OI p?

?
pp
? ? ?p
p?
MMp??l'! R R?RR ?tp BOA ?Opl ?R9p R011l ?RRp ?Opl MS
?p ?p
(D cO cO (7
t`7 th c? c'? t?J t7 t7 cOcl t?I th f7
N
8 8 8 M 8 c?th t?
R9

y
1
tN
t N N GOD d Ol
a0 V . n O
O 7 M INO of f7 M
as
O
Gp G
p.
p
? ?
cp
?M?Nt0 t0 ^O ^ On1MMTOOi5OO? ?NNN
MM -.t

N t_O w r W a0O O O OOO 0000000 001 GD _W
N N N N N N N N N ?
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pp oo p pp p pp p p pp
S M S N S N S N S M S N S ?(1 S uOi 5 cOO 00 M 5 M 5 N
C Mt7 V a NN10 cDn r W aOO O N N N N N N N N N N

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Calculate the stage-storage function for the detention system

Contour

Stage
Rectangular Basin
Dimensions
Contour
Area Average
Contour
Area Incremental
Contour
Volume Accumulated
Contour
Volume
Estimated
Stage
feet feet Length ft Width ft SF SF C C feet
0.00 0.00 15.00 15.00 225.00 0.00
0.25 0.25 15.08 15.08 227.41 226.20 56.55 56.55 0.23
0.50 0.50 15.16 15.16 229.83 228.62 114.31 170.86 0.53
0.75 0.75 15.25 15.25 232.56 231.19 173.40 287.70 0.79
1.00 1.00 15.33 15.33 235.01 233.79 233.79 407.18 1.03
1.25 1.25 15.41 15.41 237.47 236.24 295.30 529.08 1.26
1.50 1.50 15.50 15.50 240.25 238.86 358.29 653.59 1.48
1.75 1.75 15.58 15.58 242.74 241.49 422.61 780.90 1.70
2.00 2.00 15.66 15.66 245.24 243.99 487.97 910.59 1.91
K9 = 399.24
b = 1.3139
Enter Ks and b values from the graph of storage vs. stage shown on the next page
Ks = Constant of power equation
b = Exponent of power equation
1200.00
1000.00
800.00
600.00
400.00
200.00
0.00
Storage vs. Stage
alas
y = 389.24x
Rz = 0.9946
0.00 0.50 -- 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
1 OF 1
7/12/2002
r ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
r
CLIENT SUBJECT
PROJECT No.

GLASS ?r i't - G+? i rhtS?' ZY,
A2 r-A = Z . 3 c

C7 0 -r

?1/ ? S ? i Z?J `Jo
(0 C k L??

"4
r
r
1
r
1 ?-
1
r
PAGE OF
Prepared By Date
Reviewed By Date

(-- D 5
NRCD Land Quality Section
Pipe Design
Entering the following values will provide you with
the expected outlet velocity and depth of flow in a
pipe, assuming the Mannings roughness number is
constant over the entire length of the pipe.
flow Q in cfs : 11 Flow depth (ft) = 0.92
slope S in %: 1.25 Outlet velocity (fps) = 7.785
pipe diameter D in in.: 24
Manning number n : 0.013
NRCD Land Quality Section
NYDOT Dissipator Design Results
r',pC, l
Pipe diameter (ft) 2.00
Outlet velocity (fps) 7.78
Apron length (ft) 12.00
AVG DIAM
(inches)
STONE
CLASS
A
B
Bor1
2
THICKNESS
(inches)
3
6
13
23
9
22 «
22
27
-- Dissipator, Pipe or Quit (D P or Q) --

I Level Spreaders
from Erosion and Sediment Control Design Manual

I:

Ul

r-I

1

Minimum Dimensions for Level Spreader
Q cfs) Entrance Width Depth End Width Len
th
0-10 10 0.5 3 g
1
10 20 16 0.6 3 2
20-30 24 0.7 3 3Pipe Q Min Length Des Length Min Depth Des Depth

1 23 30 75 0.7 0.75
2 9.96 10 50 0.5 0.75
6 11.3 20 25 0.6 0.75
9 11 20 40 0.6 0.6

r ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
1
CLIENT SUBJECT
' PROJECT No.
i-iL (-k. , 1,x,,0„ &J L
r
vin = 3
?aN rt ?? d

V VA
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r

Prepared By
Reviewed By
aU,
PAGE OF
Date
Date
ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT SUBJECT
PROJECT No.
19 4,-Do TO 4-4.4
Prepared By
Reviewed By
PAGE OF
Date
_ Date
G? = C I p
1, 4'!.
ca.
t_
C1 Ca C? , c? Ccc. Z. "I
- ? , ?. ?'?,, `, ? ?• ? ?? ??,? ??:?.? t?? ? E ?r ?.,;? `??r ?.. t:`• ? t? `ik .:? .a ? ?„1 Gtr: ct ?.,?.
USE. 1 ?E U All A!, .c ,y A j
`? 1.1 !mil
i
i
1
i
1
1
1
I EC-DESIGN(R) 2000 Channel Analysis Report
Proiect Information
Pro.lect Name: Park at Langston Last Update: 6/20/2002 3:36:31 PM
Description:
Notes:
Units: English
Nearest City:
Channel Design
Channel Name: Henderson Rd Sta 39+00 - 44+00 Units: English Design life: 300 months

Design Criteria Vegetation and Soil Channel Geometry Flow/Velocity
Flow Rate (0) Vegetated Yes Bed Slope (ft/ft) 0.062 Discharge (cf/s) 5.250
Vegetation Class D Req. Freeboard (ft) 0.000 Flow Duration (hrs) 0.500
Soil Filled No Avg. Velocity (ft/s) 2.870
Channel Length (ft) 500.000

Channel Side Slopes Channel Bend No
Bottom Width (ft) 0.010
Left (H:1 V) 3.000 Bend Radius (ft) 0.000 Required Factor 1.00
Channel Depth (ft) 1.000 of Safety
Right (H:1 V) 3.000 Outside Bend
1
I-DESIGN(R) 2000 6/20/2002
EN G I N E E R I N G
CALCULATION SHEET PAGE OF

CLIENT E
SUBJCT
Prepared By Date

PROJECT No. Reviewed By Date
'
' Lt?F1q?e.(C?oa: 1 Z l5 - 15 1 ?S Lt Fr 5?.?? d?t?s/

' A 0

(2?S

177o

\
,f
r JJ
1

Z?_G.

EC-DESIGN(R) 2000 Channel Analysis Report
Protect Information
Protect Name: Park at Langston Last Update: 6/20/2002 4:17:06 PM
Description: Units: Eng lish
Nearest City:
Notes:

Channel Design
Channel Name: Alphawood 12+50 - 15+75 Units: English Design life: 300 months

Design Criteria Vegetation and Soil Channel Geometry Flow/Velocity
Flow Rate (0) Vegetated Yes Bed Slope (ft/ft) 0.063 Discharge (cVs) 2.600
Vegetation Class D Req. Freeboard (ft) 0.000 Flow Duration (hrs) 0.500
Soil Filled No Avg. Velocity (ft/s) 2.190
Channel Length (ft) 325.000

Channel Side Slopes Channel Bend No
Bottom Width (ft) 0.010
Left (HA V) 3.000 Bend Radius (ft) 0.000
Channel Depth (ft)
1
000 Required Factor 1.00
. of Safety
Right (H:1 V) 3.000 Outside Bend
Results
Veloci ft/s Shear Stress bs/s ft

Lining Materials
Computed Max
Allowed Safety
Factor
Computed Max
Allowed Safety
Factor
Left LANDLOK TRM 435 2.280 18.000 7.890 2.880 5.000 1.740
Bottom LANDLOK TRM 435 2.110 18.000 8.530 2.470 5.000 2.020
Right LANDLOK TRM 435 2.280 18.000 7.890 2.880 5.000 1.740
Calculation Results:
Flow Depth (ft)
Flow Area (ft)
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Composite 'n'
0.630 Left Wetted Perimeter (ft)
1.190 Bottom Wetted Perimeter (ft)
Right Wetted Perimeter (ft)
Total Wetted Perimeter (ft)
0.300
0.0792
Avg. Velocity (ft/s)
Avg. Discharge (cf/s)
1.980
0.020
1.980
3.980
2.190
2.600
Avg. Flow
Depth (ft)
0.630
DESIGN(R) 2000 6/20/2002
ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
1
CLIENT SUBJECT
PROJECT No.
AL12) Nti\ \tif
C?= C_iA
co,
r, 6, Z ?c
Lo 'J6 (_0 0 2?ec
1
?, S - 15 ,??c1a
r _
r
1
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
PAGE OF
Prepared By
Reviewed By
Date
Date

ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
r
CLIENT SUBJECT
' PROJECT No.
A
1 3,d (7 g'5
ll
Li i e-, 4
v it a 1? .. "a ! ?,:.> :i
r '
r
r
r
r
r
r
Prepared By
Reviewed By
PAG E
OF
Date
Date
I EC-DESIGN(R) 2000 Channel Analysis Report
Proiect Information
Proiect Name: Park at Langston Last Update: 6/20/2002 3:59:33 PM
Description: Units: Eng lish
Nearest City:
Notes:

Channel Design
Channel Name: Tributary Units: English Design life: 300 months

Design Criteria Vegetation and Soil Channel Geometry Flow/Velocity
Flow Rate (Q) Vegetated Yes Bed Slope (ft/ft) 0.080 Discharge (cf/s) 3.000
Vegetation Class D Req. Freeboard (ft) 0.000 Flow Duration (hrs) 0.500
Soil Filled No Avg. Velocity (ft/s) 2.590
Channel Length (ft) 300.000

Channel Side Slopes Channel Bend No
Bottom Width (ft) 0.010
Left (HA V) 3.000 Bend Radius (ft) 0.000 Required Factor 1.00
Channel Depth (ft) 1.000 of Safety
Right (HA V) 3.000 Outside Bend

I-DESIGN(R) 2000 6/20/2002
ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT SUBJECT
PROJECT No.
C? I I
A, 1 Cl I
!„?
P
4
L-km

?- & . ? `-t e S 5

I ? iz

w

PAGE OF
Prepared By Date
Reviewed By Date
. J
?e..
C-a A,
1
(x??
C? 1?{ 4 t 'o
r
' ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
PAGE OF
r
CLIENT -SUBJECT Prepared By Date
PROJECT No. Reviewed By Date
c1c
G=.w
Jl?
r
r_
1
l<(L1? L?Z Lcr?-r?? ..
Q= C w L 1--1, s
r 1
i)
r , Ac. - . A..1 ?, A% \e l f - 64 v S I Or t-4 e A
I .I C.4",
r
ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT SUBJECT
PROJECT No.

cuo
Prepared By
Reviewed By
PAGE OF
Date
Date

co cze

Pc, 0 c4 = Z, 9 S c s
,..- ..W Utz
CIS
r
t
r
r ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
1
CLIENT SUBJECT _
PROJECT No.
Gtr 4
Prepared By
Reviewed By
PAGE OF
Date
Date

A = v. 2S a e
r G. o

C: 3)

1

1 C{? .G IL ?C?T2 VAe kTt ?R I t7k 'e
t=- C / vri?? ?c. cr?rl
C.d. Jas

3/7
.
4.

f•

r 4
0

C W L 1---1 ? 2 Z

1
Ac 41 ?kA U?Lf-e

r

r
i ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET
1
CLIENT
' PROJECT No.
SUBJECT

1
I
I

? -= CZ to

A4 C?,r,
1

PAGE OF
Prepared By Date
Reviewed By Date
Ile
0, u
C" m?
A ?

I,J . L -L A e "(" { r

i
Channel Design
Date: 7/15/2002
Designer: CEK
Project: Park at Langston
Channel Location: Relocation at Blue Needle
Q10= 71.5 cfs
m = 4 :1
slope = 0.038 ft/ft
lining grass
Maximum Permissible Velocity = 4.5 fps
n = 0.03
compute best hydraulic section
k = 0.246
y = 1.461 8.929202 3.249681
Best Hydraulic Section
Depth = 1.46 ft
Bottom Width = 0.36 ft
Velocity of BHS:
Wetted Area = 9.06 sq ft
Velocity = 7.89 fps
Velocity Too High
If BHS and Velocity are ok, use this design. Else continue to Velcity limited procedure
Area = 15.89 sq ft
W1 = -4.25
W2 = 50.142961
Depth of Flow = 0.33 ft
Bottom Width = 47.46 ft
If channel section is ok, use this design. Else continue to Depth limited procedure
Bottom width = 3 ft
Depth of Flow = 1.2 ft
m = 4 :1
Depth of Channel = 1.7
Velocity = 7.6 fps Velcoity is Too High! Use permanent liner
Area = 9.36
Wetted Perimeter = 12.90
Hydraulic Radius = 0.73
Zreq = 7.38
Zav = 7.558848 Depth is too high
Adjust values for Bottom Width, Depth of Flow, and m to make Zreq = Zav

Channel Design
Date: 7/15/2002
Designer: CEK
Project: Park at Langston
Channel Location: Trapezoidal Ditch 1 - Lots 11-12
Drainage Area = 0.5 ac
Q10 = 21.7 cfs
m= 3:1
slope = 0.0211 ft/ft
lining grass
Maximum Permissible Velocity = 4.5 fps
n = 0.03
Length = 280 ft.
best hydraulic section
k = 0.325
y = 1.144 2.302064 1.609246
Best Hydraulic Section
Depth = 1.14 ft
Bottom Width = 0.37 ft
Velocity of BHS:
Wetted Area = 4.35 sq ft
Velocity = 4.99 fps Velocity Too High
If BHS and Velocity are ok, use this design. Else continue to Velcity limited procedure
Velocity Limited
Area = 4.82 sq'ft
W1 = -3.32
W2 = 9.7889883
Depth of Flow = 0.63 ft
Bottom Width = 5.83 ft
If channel section is ok, use this design. Else continue to Normal Depth procedure
Normal Depth
Bottom width = 3 ft
Depth of Flow = 0.82 ft
m= 3:1
Depth of Channel = 1.5 ft
Velocity = 4.8 fps Velcoity is Too High! Use permanent liner
Area = 4.4772 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 8.19 ft
Hydraulic Radius = 0.55 ft
Zreq = 3.01
Zav = 2.994 Depth is too low
Adjust values for Bottom Width, Depth of Flow, and m to make Zreq = Zav

Channel Design
Date: 7/15/2002
Designer: CEK
Project: Park at Langston
Channel Location: Trapezoidal Ditch 1 - Lots 12-13
Drainage Area = 3 ac
Q10 = 19.5 cfs
m= 3:1
slope = 0.0175 ft/ft
lining grass
Maximum Permissible Velocity = 4.5 fps
n = 0.03
Length = 190 ft.
best hydraulic section
k = 0.325
y = 1.138 2.068675 1.465549
Best Hydraulic Section
Depth = 1.14 ft
Bottom Width = 0.37 ft
Velocity of BHS:
Wetted Area = 4.31 sq ft
Velocity = 4.53 fps Velocity Too High
If BHS and Velocity are ok, use this design. Else continue to Velcity limited procedure
Velocity Limited
Area = 4.33 sq ft
W1 = -3.32
W2 = 7.6450333
Depth of Flow = 1.01 ft
Bottom Width = 1.23 ft
If channel section is ok, use this design. Else continue to Normal Depth procedure
Normal Depth
Bottom width = 3 ft
Depth of Flow = 0.8 ft
m = 3 :1
Depth of Channel = 1.5 ft
Velocity = 4.5 fps Velocity is Too High! Use permanent liner
Area = 4.32 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 8.06 ft
Hydraulic Radius = 0.54 ft
Zreq = 2.97
Zav = 2.850 Depth is too low
Adjust values for Bottom Width, Depth of Flow, and m to make Zreq = Zav

Channel Design
Date: 7/15/2002
Designer: CEK
Project: Park at Langston
Channel Location: Trapezoidal Ditch 1 - Lots 13-14
Drainage Area = 1.25 ac
Q10= 5.5 cfs
m = 3 :1
slope = 0.0211 ft/ft
lining grass
Maximum Permissible Velocity = 4.5 fps
n = 0.03
Length = 300 ft.
best hydraulic section
k = 0.325
y = 0.684 0.583473 1.609246
Best Hydraulic Section
Depth = 0.68 ft
Bottom Width = 0.22 ft
Velocity of BHS:
Wetted Area = 1.55 sq ft
Velocity = 3.54 fps Velocity OK
If BHS and Velocity are ok, use this design. Else continue to Velcity limited procedure
VelocltV Limited
Area = 1.22 sq ft
W1 = -3.32
W2 = 2.48108
Depth of Flow = #NUM! ft
Bottom Width = #NUM! ft
If channel section is ok, use this design. Else continue to Normal Depth procedure
Normal Depth
Bottom width = 4 ft
Depth of Flow = 0.35 ft
m = 3 :1
Depth of Channel = 1 ft
Velocity = 3.1 fps OK
Area = 1.7675 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 6.21 ft
Hydraulic Radius = 0.28 ft
Zreq = 0.76
Zav = 0.764 Depth is too high
Adjust values for Bottom Width, Depth of Flow, and m to make Zreq = Zav

Channel Design
Date: 7/15/2002
Designer: CEK
Project: Park at Langston
Channel Location: Trapezoidal Ditch 1 - Lots 23-25
Drainage Area = 1.2 ac
Q10 = 5.2 cfs
m= 3:1
slope = 0.0175 ft/ft
lining grass
Maximum Permissible Velocity = 4.5 fps
n = 0.03
Length = 375 ft.
best hydraulic section
k = 0.325
y = 0.693 0.551647 1.465549
Best Hydraulic Section
Depth = 0.69 ft
Bottom Width = 0.22 ft
Velocity of BHS:
Wetted Area = 1.60 sq ft
Velocity = 3.25 fps Velocity OK
If BHS and Velocity are ok, use this design. Else continue to Velcity limited procedure
Velocity Limited
Area = 1.16 sq ft
W1 = -3.32
W2 = 2.0386756
Depth of Flow = #NUM! ft
Bottom Width = #NUM! ft
If channel section is ok, use this design. Else continue to Normal Depth procedure
Normal Depth
Bottom width = 4 ft
Depth of Flow = 0.35 ft
m= 3:1
Depth of Channel = 1 ft
Velocity = 2.9 fps OK
Area = 1.7675 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 6.21 ft
Hydraulic Radius = 0.28 ft
Zreq = 0.79
Zav = 0.764 Depth is too low
Adjust values for Bottom Width, Depth of Flow, and m to make Zreq = Zav

5 - 1'' DIAMETER WEEPHOLES
f? ------? 0.75'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -?
3•
? SEE ?,?s )
2 - 6'' RAILROAD TIES
1'' DIAMETER WEEPHOLES
NTS
GRASS SWALE WITH
TIMBER CHECK DAM
GRAVEL C ?5? >'" )

Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
' Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 1
Location of Sediment Trap =
'
1)raina_ge Area description to sediment trap
Disturbed earth (this project) = 0.60 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 1.40 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, grassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.60
' Total = 2.00 AC @ c= 0.29
Required design aspects of sediment trap
' Required sediment volume of trap =_>
The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one year of sediment storaqe.
' Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
Sediment storaqe required = 1080 CF
' Kev aspects of sediment trap as designed
' Desiqn dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment storaqe amount =_>
Sediment storaqe depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 360 SF
' Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 length to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 15.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
' Sediment trap width = 30.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 450.00 SF OK
' Sediment storaqe volume provided = 1350.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioninq for flood passage =_>
Add 0.50 foot of flood storaqe above sediment storaqe zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass Q10 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
' Lenqth of spillway required (max. depth of flow = 1.0 ft.) __>
' Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr

Q10 =
Weir lenqth =
Depth of flow for this weir length =
Resultant depth to top of berm =
Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap
I
4.19 cfs
10.0 ft
0.27 ft
4.27 ft
OK
Depth to top of berm = 4.3 feet
Depth to crest of spillwav = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 15 feet
Lenqth = 30 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet minimum
Note: Sediment trap dimensions -given Oenoth and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.
I

Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
' Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 2
Location of Sediment Trap =
' Drainage Area description to sediment trap
Disturbed earth (this project) = 0.50 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, grassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 2.00 AC @ c= 0.60
Total = 2.50 AC @ c= 0.58
' Required design aspects of sediment trap
Required sediment volume of trap ==>
' The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one year of sediment storaqe.
Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
Sediment storaqe required = 900 CF
1 Key aspects of sediment trap as designed
Design dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment storage amount =_>
LI'

Sediment storaqe depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 300 SF
Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 length to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 15.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Sediment trap width = 30.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 450.00 SF OK
Sediment storaqe volume provided = 1350.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioning for flood passage ==>
Add 0.50 foot of flood storage above sediment storaqe zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass Q10 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
Lenqth of spillway required (max. depth of flow = 1.0 ft.) ==>
Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr
Q10 = 10.47 cfs
Weir length = 10.0 ft

' Depth of flow for this weir lenqth = 0.50 ft OK
Resultant depth to top of berm = 4.50 ft
' Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap

Depth to top of berm = 4.5 feet
Depth to crest of spillway = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 15 feet
Lenqth = 30 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet (minimum)
Note: Sediment trap dimensions given (length and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.
1

I

'
Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
' Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 3
Location of Sediment Trap =

Drainage Area description to sediment trap
Disturbed earth (this project) = 0.30 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 1.50 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, qrassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.95
Total = 1.80 AC @ c= 0.25
Required design aspects of sediment trap
Required sediment volume of trap =_>
The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one vear of sediment storaqe.
Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
Sediment storaqe required = 540 CF
' Kev aspects of sediment trap as designed
Design dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment storage amount =_>
Sediment storage depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 180 SF
r Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 length to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 20.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Sediment trap width = 10.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 200.00 SF OK
' Sediment storage volume provided = 600.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioning for flood passaqe =_>
" Add 0.50 foot of flood storaqe above sediment storaqe zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass Q10 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
" Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
r Length of spillwav required (max. depth of flow = 1.0 ft.) __>
Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr

i
Q10 = 3.25 cfs
Weir lenqth = 10.0 ft
Depth of flow for this weir lenqth = 0.23 ft
Resultant depth to top of berm = 4.23 ft
Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap
Depth to top of berm = 4.2 feet
Depth to crest of spillway = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 20 feet
Lenqth = 10 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet minimum
OK
Note: Sediment trap dimensions given (length and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.

Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
' Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 4
' Location of Sediment Trap =
Drainage Area description to sediment trap
Disturbed earth (this project) = 0.55 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 0.60 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, grassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.95

Total = 1.15 AC @ c= 0.34
' Required design aspects of sediment trap
' Required sediment volume of trap =_>
The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one year of sediment storaqe.
Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
Sediment storaqe required = 990 CF
' Kev aspects of sediment trap as desiqned
' Design dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment stora.qe amount =_>
Sediment storaqe depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 330 SF
' Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 lenqth to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 30.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Sediment trap width = 15.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 450.00 SF OK
' Sediment storaqe volume provided = 1350.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioninq for flood passage =_>
Add 0.50 foot of flood storage above sediment storaqe zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass 010 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
Lenqth of spillwav required (max. depth of flow = 1.0 ft.) __>
Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr

Q10 = 2.85 cfs
Weir lenqth = 10.0 ft
Depth of flow for this weir lenqth = 0.21 ft
Resultant depth to top of berm = 4.21 ft
Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap
Depth to top of berm = 4.2 feet
Depth to crest of spillway = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 30 feet
Lenqth = 15 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet minimum
OK
Note: Sediment trap dimensions given (length and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.
Y
Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 5
Location of Sediment Trap =
Drainage Area description to sediment trap
' Disturbed earth (this project) = 1.00 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 2.00 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, qrassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.95
Total = 3.00 AC @ c= 0.30
' Required design aspects of sediment trap
' Required sediment volume of trap =_>
The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one year of sediment storaqe.
Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
' Sediment storaqe required = 1800 CF
Kev aspects of sediment trap as designed
' Desiqn dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment storage amount =_>
Sediment storaqe depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 600 SF
Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 lenqth to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 20.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
' Sediment trap width = 40.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 800.00 SF OK
' Sediment storaqe volume provided = 2400.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioninq for flood passage =_>
Add 0.50 foot of flood storage above sediment storage zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass Q10 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
" Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
' Lenqth of spillway required (max depth of flow= 1.0 ft.) __>
Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr
' Q10=
Weir lenqth =
' Depth of flow for this weir lenqth =
Resultant depth to top of berm =
Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap
I
6.50 cfs
10.0 ft
0.36 ft
4.36 ft
OK
Depth to top of berm = 4.4 feet
Depth to crest of spillway = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 20 feet
Length = 40 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet minimum
Note: Sediment trap dimensions given flenoth and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.

Sediment Trap Sizing
(Reference: NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual)
Project and Project Number = Park at Lanqston
Sediment Trap ID = 6&7
Location of Sediment Trap =
Drainage Area description to sediment trap
Disturbed earth (this project) = 0.25 AC @ c= 0.50
Undisturbed, wooded areas = 0.25 AC @ c= 0.20
Undisturbed, grassy areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.35
Other areas = 0.00 AC @ c= 0.95
Total = 0.50 AC @ c= 0.35
Required design aspects of sediment trap
Required sediment volume of trap =_>
The sediment trap must provide 1800 CF of sediment storaqe per disturbed acre of land. This is
approximately one year of sediment storaqe.
Reduction Factor permitted by erosion control authority = 1
Associated cleanout period for reduction factor = One year
Sediment storaqe required = 450 CF
Kev aspects of sediment trap as designed
Desiqn dimensions for sediment trap based on required sediment storage amount =_>
Sediment storaqe depth needed = 3.0 ft
Surface area required = 150 SF
Bottom of trap dimensions to provide required surface area and maintain a 2:1 length to width ratio =_>
Sediment trap lenqth = 20.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Sediment trap width = 10.00 ft (measured at bottom of trap)
Surface area provided = 200.00 SF OK
Sediment storaqe volume provided = 600.00 CF
Sediment trap required dimensioning for flood passage =_>
" Add 0.50 foot of flood storaqe above sediment storaqe zone (to set rip-rap weir)
Pass Q10 over rip-rap weir with 0.50 foot minimum freeboard
**Max. depth of flow over weir = 1.0 foot
Lenqth of spillwav required (max. depth of flow = 1.0 ft.) __>
Regional ten year storm intensity, 110 = 7.22 in/hr
5

Q10 = 1.26 cfs
Weir lenqth = 10.0 ft
Depth of flow for this weir lenqth = 0.12 ft
Resultant depth to top of berm = 4.12 ft
Final minimum dimensions for sediment trap
Depth to top of berm = 4.1 feet
Depth to crest of spillway = 3.5 feet
Sediment Storaqe Depth = 3.0 feet
Width = 20 feet
Lenqth = 10 feet
Length of Weir = 10.0 feet minimum
OK
Note: Sediment trap dimensions given (length and width) are dimensions for
the bottom of the sediment trap.
V VVh IVIN111=11'. unary, VVVCU?V?
0 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\OC? pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
> f ? a Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
i
Division of Water. Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: t Fax
,Company: Date: 2Z Dom`
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
NMENO
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
NCDENR-DWQ '-
Attn: Mr. John Dorney 1 ?UL 8
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621,
WETLANDS GROUP
WA Lit QUALITY SECTION r,
RE: 401-Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules Compliance
Request
Park at Langston
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project no.: 5968
DWQ Project no.: 020831
Dear Mr. Dorney,
In reference to your letter dated July 10th, 2001 (received by S&EC on July 16th, 2002-
see attached), our client, Barker Realty, does not intend to withdraw the 401-Water
Quality Certification application and Neuse River Buffer Compliance request for the Park
at Langston.
As requested in NC-DWQ's initial correspondence regarding the project (see attached
letter dated June 4th, 2002), S&EC forwarded information provided by the project
engineer (CH Engineering) to address stormwater discharge/diffuse flow through buffers.
Since this information was determined to be inadequate by NC-DWQ, the project
engineer (CH Engineering) will resubmit the requested calculations and plans
demonstrating that diffuse flow through the buffers will be achieved directly to NC-
DWQ. Therefore, please do not consider the application withdrawn-rather, it should be
considered to be on administrative hold pending the receipt of additional information that
will allow the continued processing of the permit application.
Please call me if you require any additional information, or email me at
j cooperna,sand ec. com.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
PMB 291, 3020-1 Prosperity Church Road 3817-E Lawndale Drive 910 Boston Road
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 2868
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
July 18th, 2002
?WATFAO Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
L
?O G
y L
, ;1 rth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
D -•--.____....__.
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
( Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
1i U[
June 4
2002
,
DWQ # 02-0831
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Dear Mr. Cooper:
On May 24, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetlands for the purpose of providing roadway and sewer access
for the residential subdivision in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas.
Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply.
In particular as described in 15A NCAC 213 .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds
on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance V = 100 feet) so we can
begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. Your plans indicate stormwater discharge that will not flow in a diffuse manner through
buffers. Please provide plans and calculations to show that diffuse flow shall be achieved.
2. Please provide table referenced in item # XI.
Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer
want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
S
do Dorney
Wa r Quality Certific tion Program
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
William Baker

North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
Ph: [phone], Fax: [phone], http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
F WArF
\O?? 9QG Michael F. Easley
Governor
6 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
j Department of Environment and Natural Resources
5 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Mr. William Barker
1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 166
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Cooper and Mr. Barker:
July 10, 2002
RE2
?V '?Lllil
Re: Park at Langston
Wake County
DWQ # 020831
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your response, received June 26, 2002, to our request for
additional information regarding your application for a 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval, received May
24, 2002, for the subject project.
In previous correspondence dated June 4, 2002, this Office requested that you provide plans and calculations
to show that diffuse flow of stormwater would be provided in the Neuse Riparian Buffers in compliance with 15A NCAC 2B
.0233 (5). Only one plan page was provided that indicated some kind of level spreader for one of the five listed stormwater
outlets. No calculations were provided to show that this level spreader is adequately sized, and no topographic
information was provided to show that the slopes were adequate to accept the flow. No calculations or (readable) plans
were provided for the other outlets. This information was needed by DWQ in order for us to decide whether this project is
approvable.
Since the requested information was not provided, we are hereby returning the subject application. As such,
this application is withdrawn. Should you decide to reapply you must provide seven copies of an application and
supporting documentation as well as the appropriate fee.
If you have any questions please contact Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 or John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if
you have any questions.
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regional Office
EPA Region IV
Todd St. John
File
Central Files
Simerely
n limek, PE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
o?0? W A r?Rp?
co
r
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Mr. William Barker }
1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 16
i.?
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Cooper and Mr. Barker:
Michael F. Easley
{ r'' Governor
i 1 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 10, 2002
Re: Park at Langston
Wake County
DWQ # 020831
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your response, received June 26, 2002, to our request for
additional information regarding your application for a 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval, received May
24, 2002, for the subject project.
In previous correspondence dated June 4, 2002, this Office requested that you provide plans and calculations
to show that diffuse flow of stormwater would be provided in the Neuse Riparian Buffers in compliance with 15A NCAC 213
.0233 (5). Only one plan page was provided that indicated some kind of level spreader for one of the five listed stormwater
outlets. No calculations were provided to show that this level spreader is adequately sized, and no topographic
information was provided to show that the slopes were adequate to accept the flow. No calculations or (readable) plans
were provided for the other outlets. This information was needed by DWQ in order for us to decide whether this project is
approvable.
Since the requested information was not provided, we are hereby returning the subject application. As such,
this application is withdrawn. Should you decide to reapply you must provide seven copies of an application and
supporting documentation as well as the appropriate fee.
If you have any questions please contact Todd St. John at 919-733-9584 or John Dorney at 919-733-9646 if
you have any questions.
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regional Office
EPA Region IV
Todd St. John
File
Central Files
plimek,PE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
p[?' ? ?su9' ? S

L r
O ?
iY i l Li IJ IJ1 i . ey, (J,l., :IIIVI
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of E:rvironment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quit itv
_7-
_
DWQ # 02083)
UJAYE County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
i [Il e Ir
rcr - -- s,e
w
Dear Mr.(5AK. .
V a ?V-
On ?.-2(0 2002 the Division of Water Quality (D Q) was no1t? fied by receipt of' your ation
regarding your plan to fill wetland for the purpose of in WV County. Approval from D?h'Q
is required to disturb these (P S. The enclosed application needs to be completed and returned to U?
with 7 copies of the application, supporting maps and documentation. In pa.i-ticular os described in
15A NCAC 28 .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds on the property. Please
show these on maps of st.titable scale (for instance 17' = 100 feet) so we can begin to cactet-rnine your
prc)jects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our riles
or procedura; materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with i_`•A
NCAC 21-1 .0505(c). The: processing time for this application vJll begin when this infor;nation is
received. Uwe do not hear from you by writing within three .leeks we will assume you no lon; e
want to pursue the prole,: t and will consider it withdrawn.
1
c ?eL , ( DWQ Regional Office
Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Gp 2 vr.vt-U ep 1o•-Q C??ttil ?a?:?r
Re??(
t 010 kaue*, (,t,
Ra15L
Sincerer.
John R. Dorsey
401 Water Quality Certihcal[lon Fro-,ram
Q&A
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, rJCD[hR
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o enr.state.nc.us.'r,cwetlands
f II E CAP'
Environmental Consultants, FA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
June 26th, 2002'
1 I'D
JUN 2 6 20OQ2
RE: Request for Additional Information-401-Water Quality Certification and
Neuse River Buffer Rules Compliance Request
Park at Langston
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
UTM coordinates: 703500„ E 39, 39750'nN
S&EC Project #: 5968
DWQ Project #: 02-0831
Dear Mr. Dorney,
In response to your letter dated June 4th, 2002 (see attached), enclosed is the approved
wetland delineation for the Park at Langston as well as calculations provided by the
project engineer regarding diffuse flow through the Neuse River Riparian Buffers.
It should be noted that in the preconstruction notification form (PCN) originally
submitted, under Item XI (which discusses stormwater), it was erroneously mentioned
that calculation tables provided by the project engineer were included in the application.
These tables were not included in the application submitted to NC-DWQ. However, as
indicated in the attached calculation tables provided here by the project engineer
addressing stormwater issues, impervious surface acreage is estimated at 15 %, well
below the established 30 % threshold requiring stormwater management plans.
Therefore, we do not believe that a stormwater management plan should be required by
NC-DWQ.
Please call me if you require any additional information, or email me at
j cooper(n,s and ec. com.
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
710 Boston Road
Taylorsville, NC' 28681
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
OF W ATFR _ ___ _ Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
J?N rth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j D - - Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
? Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
- - June 4, 2002
DWQ # 02-0831
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Dear Mr. Cooper:
On May 24, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetlands for the purpose of providing roadway and sewer access
for the residential subdivision in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas.
Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply.
In particular as described in 15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds
on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can
begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
Your plans indicate stormwater discharge that will not flow in a diffuse manner through
buffers. Please provide plans and calculations to show that diffuse flow shall be achieved.
Please provide table referenced in item # XI.
Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 214 .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer
want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
foh Dorney
Wa r Quality Certific tion Program
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
William Baker
AU
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
Ph: [phone], Fax: [phone], http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
C ENGINEERING
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO:
:5: w. r.e p fem.
CH Engineering, PLLC
4601 Lake Boone Trail
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.788.0224
919.788.0232 (fax)
DATE: G! tr'10 ?JOB NO:
RE: ? •.- A k
L •?
We are transmitting: Delivered via:
P- Attached ? Courier
? Under Separate Cover o Overnight Delivery
o Via email / ftp ? Mail
The following items: ? Plats ? Digital Files
? Plans ? Specifications ? Change Orders
? Drawings ? Shop Drawings ? Documents
? Application/Fee ? Other
COPIES DESCRIPTION

?OC 310. O 'F E: a ?CJc
II
IL #I aL f0? p???.1`
LL
r L?

o For Approval ? Approved as Submitted
w 'For Your Use ? Approved As Noted
a,"As Requested ? Returned for Revisions
o For Distribution ? For Review and Comment
Signed ?h'l C , a4n; ? C _
rCax'y FAX.SVr Flage: 008- Pa,k L
Pan L Riparian Buffers
Area includes ripanan buifer5? () Ne gYes f )Fxer"P;
If yes, Ceuse 0 foot :Q 100 foot
River Basin? ( I Cape Fear
Basis for exempt -----
Show buffers on site plan.
` Part It. Nltroyan Calculatlo
a,8 ubdi-%751on irdformat on:
Number of lots
Number of lots ; acre
Total area of lots (excluding
RNV and open space)
Average lot size
t, Pre-development loading:
Type & Land Cover
ns (Method 1, Appendix C):
?!
3L 4Zp`
18.91Ac
Permanently protected undisturbed open space
(forest, unmown meadow)
Permanently protected managed open spare
(grass, landscaping etc.)
Impervious Area
TO -
Nitrogen Loading Rate (lbs/ac/yr) = i 0 • 6
c. Post-development loading:
Type of Land Cover
Permanently protected undisturbed open space
(`orest, unmown meadow)
Permanently protected managed oper: spa e
(grads, landscap•1)g etc,)
Right-,of-way (read TN export from Graphl)
Lots (read TN export from Graph 2)
Average house size
Amount of Right-of-*'ay
Percent of Right-of-Way
that is Impervious area
Tota(estimated Impervious area
?z7s sF
A c
Sv?
TN export
Area TN export coeff. from use
(acres) (lbs/ac/yr) (lbs/yr)
_ 3 2-- z12 0.60 k g .4 5

r I
1.20
21
20
0 .
t q Y
TN export
Area TN export coeff, from use
(acres) (lbs/aclyr) (lbslyr)
0.60
_ /0 2d (D• i Z?I
1.2A 1

Z. 44 2 7 2-
_-?
TOTAL
Nitrogen Loading Rate (Ibslaclyr) = 2 - 4f 6
Nitrogen Load after BMPs = - N r A-
Nitrogen Load Offset by Payments =
Net change In on-site N Load '--
Par? IU. Control of Peak Stormwater Flow
Calculated Pre-development Peak ria.,t _ 0.17 cFs
Calcu?ated Post-development Reak Flow
I, the undersigned, certify to the best or my knowledge that the above Information is correct (affix seal).
"atF1111161ri"?o
E SS Ol ?•y''
oQ a
O O
S EA?
°
40
B?a?0E46Apd8`b?e / (/ p l
7 v
Graphs for use with Method 1: Residential Sites with no known building footprints.
- --v--?
Graph 1 . Total Nitrogen Export from Right-of-Way
25.0
T
I
20.E
15.0
C
l u
z
i- 5-C,
0,0-
L Percentage of Fgghl.-of-Way that is Pavement

Graph 2: Total Nitrogen Export trom Lots
Total Ittrogen Export from WS
i 2.00

6.00
_ s_00
i
w
00
2-CA')
0.?
r
1 ,
2 d 6 fi q0 12 4 1U 13 20 22 24 26 28
Numbor of Owel?log Units per Acre,
/r7
Z
/ o i I I z I
o I i I o
co d,7i / I I I , to-19.0 dol o I
J2 ° J 9L ,o NIy? ,5L 09.
190 N

v /
z da.
D
000 ( ?/ ?Al
I i
I l
i
? I
\w
as ??ad??ds vri
s
0.01E ° ANI
SIA
I
Tigoo--
09 E?E uAOMIN01tjq
2
IL
LO
'q
0
N
O
N
O
O
N
LO
N
O
C
m
.O
N
.N
N
O
Cl
ca
C
O
m
C
J
N
Y
co
m
N O ? O up' )Cl) 0 ? M O 'It
?
Z CN
O O co
CO p
I? V-
O L6
O 6
(O O)
CO O L6
O N
co N
O
M M M M M M M C") Cr) M M M
a e?- O 0 0 0 to

CV O ?
C
j M M C'7 M C`7

O
<t co
=
?
?-
?t

?
N
? Q Q Q Q

Q 0 0 ^ 0 tr) m O N 0 ? 0 t1ro)
0 0 0 0 0 O t6 "i c n

(? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z t(j uj O p er ui
N
O
pi

c+j
W ?t 00 00 "t p O M 00 0 00 1

) 0
C 0
N 00 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
00 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Z O C ^O ? N ? (o
o
co c No
c o(6
M C„) M C„) M M M M M M Cn M
a Lq ° OO L°n LO
Q M M CYj
M M CC) M C
Q
Ot N
Q O
Q rr (O _ .-
Z
Q
U- Q Q ?
0
0 U U ? W W W W

cc ? U U U U U U U U U
cl?
rOj V- <t cp 00 tt Co c0 00 CO
W N N M ?- N N ? C") M M
a ?- N M It (D N D 0) A- N M

CO
0
co
W
W
CL
a
m
C/) ;
co fO
?. I I
-?
Q N N
WJ NO
Q.
a
oQ
CQ?
II
CV)
Nt CCV 11
- l[)
C) 11
WJ?:N04 O
CL CL CL

CO m m
- -
-
co
C co u) CQ co co co
C II p II et II
?- OC) N V O N O U O O ?- O
II II - ?
mW N 0 II II O
W J N II II - O
W J N O
a
(D
v
N
O
N
O
O
N
LO
N
O
C
m
N
U
N
O
O
cu
C
(z
a
C
O
m
C
QS
J
O William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\p 6 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
O Y Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
June 4, 2002
DWQ # 02-0831
?l Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jim Cooper
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Yo? n
Dear Mr. Cooper:
On May 24, 2002 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your
application regarding your plan to fill wetlands for the purpose of providing roadway and sewer access
for the residential subdivision in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas.
Please provide 7 copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply.
In particular as described in 15A NCAC 2B .0502, we will require you to locate all streams and ponds
on the property. Please show these on maps of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can
begin to determine your projects' compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500.
1. Your plans indicate stormwater discharge that will not flow in a diffuse manner through
buffers. Please provide plans and calculations to show that diffuse flow shall be achieved.
2. Please provide table referenced in item # XI.
Please telephone me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we will assume you no longer
want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
do Dorney
Wa r Quality Certiflc tion Program
cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
William Baker
AGWA
MEW
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
Ph: [phone], Fax: [phone], http:l/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
.020831
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
w a 'tf
MAY 1
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. John Domey
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
?. i
WLWE WETLANDS MOUP
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Nationwide Permits 12 and 39, 401-Water Quality Certification, and Neuse
River Buffer Rules Compliance Request
Park at Langston
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
UTM coordinates: 703500"'E 39, 39750"'N
S&EC Project #: 5968
Dear Mr. Dorney and Ms. Jones,
On behalf of William Barker, (property owner), we hereby request authorization from the
US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permits 12 and 39 for the subject project
to cover permanent impacts to stream channels and wetlands. We also request written
concurrence from the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project
complies with the 401-Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide Permit 39,
and that it complies with the Neuse River Riparian Buffer rules. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
S&EC performed a Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the site in fall 2000, and a detailed
wetland delineation in April 2002, which was submitted to the USACE for approval on
May 20th, 2002. Data forms for the delineation are attached. NC-DWQ confirmed
S&EC's Neuse River Buffer evaluation (NBRRO 01-199-see attached).
The proposed project, which consists of a residential subdivision, is located east of West
Lake Rd. (SRI 387), west of Bells Lake Rd. (SR 1386), approximately one mile south of
Ten-Ten Rd. (SR 1010) near Cary, Wake County, NC. Please refer to the USGS site
snap. The property comprises approximately 32 acres, and is in the Neuse River Basin.
Approximately 0.003 acres (1,278 ft.2) of jurisdictional wetlands and 85 linear ft. of
stream channel will be impacted for a roadway crossing (Impact 1-see impact maps)
under Nationwide Permit 39 (totaling 0.03 acres/85 linear ft.). Approximately 9,983 ft.2
(zone 1: 6,291 ft. 2, zone 2: 3,692 ft.2) of Neuse River Buffer will be impacted by the
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 710 Boston Road
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
i
r. r, - May 24th, 2002
proposed roadway crossings (Impact 1). Approximately 0.011 acres (495 ft.2) of
jurisdictional wetlands and 20 linear ft. of stream channel will be temporarily impacted
under NWP 12 (Impact 2-see impact maps). Total proposed impacts are 0.0411 acres
(0.011 temporary)/ 105 linear ft. (20 ft. temporary).
The Town of Cary originally required two roadway crossings over the channel where
proposed impacts will occur in order to preserve connectivity within the site-despite our
client's wishes-who understood that the two crossings conflicted with avoiding and
minimizing unnecessary impacts to wetlands/waters of the U.S. Thus, William Barker
(our client), S&EC, and a project engineer from CH Engineering met with Bob Zarzecki
of NC-DWQ in January to discuss the crossing requirement. After this meeting, the
project's land planner and engineer were able to convince Cary to drop one of the
required roadway crossings, leaving the one proposed in this application, which is
necessary to access high ground in the northeastern portion of the property. Additionally,
DOT has relaxed the minimum turn radius requirement for the extension of Alphawood
Drive (see impact map) in order to minimize Neuse River buffer impacts.
It is important to note that the road shown entering the site on the northern property line
is not yet constructed, and is a reserved road right-of-way-not a dedicated right-of=way.
Thus, the road right-of-way is still owned by the adjacent site's developer. Additionally,
there is a gas line easement parallel to the northern property line immediately adjacent to
the property.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification. The proposed roadway crossing is necessary in
order to access high ground in the northeastern portion of the property. This road is an
extension of a stubbed road on the western property line. Both the roadway and sewer
line crossing, as evinced by the site plan, have been designed to cross wetland areas and
the stream channel perpendicularly. A large, contiguous bottomland hardwood forest
wetland in the middle of the property has been completely avoided, as have all other
wetlands/waters of the U.S. onsite.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel
impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel per project. Because the
proposed cumulative impacts resulting from the project total 0.0411 acres (0.011 acres
temporary)/ 105 linear ft. (20 ft. temporary), project impacts are below the
aforementioned thresholds, and S&EC believes that neither wetland nor stream channel
mitigation should be required
Additionally, NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for buffer impacts if
they do not exceed 1/3 acre per buffered channel tributary. Because the proposed buffer
impacts resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned threshold
(9,983 ft.z or 0.229 acres), buffer mitigation should not be required. Because the
proposed sewer line corridor will cross the riparian buffer perpendicularly and is less than
40 ft. wide, it is considered an "exempt" activity by the Neuse River Basin Riparian
Buffer Rules, and should not require riparian buffer mitigation.
Please call me if you require any additional information, or email me at
jcooper ,sandec.com.
Sincerely,
V
Jim Cooper
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
USGS Site Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey Map
Wetland and Upland Data Forms (USACE copy only)
Overall site impact map with detailed roadway crossing impact maps
Agent Authorization Form
NC-DWQ $200 Check (NC-DWQ copy only)
Neuse River Buffer confirmation letter
Justification letter from project engineer

\ NA
T??Q
7
> .r.l
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Perm app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which pen-nit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.anny.mil/wetlands/regtour.htiu, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page I of 12
LAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead pennitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will detennine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg.pdf.
Processing times vary by pen-nit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 12
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12 and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Infonnation
Name: William Barker
Mailing Address: 1401 Sunday Drive, Suite 166
Raleigh. NC. 27607
Telephone Number: (919)-859-0044 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jim Cooper
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh. NC 27614
Telephone Number: (919)-846-5900 Fax Number: (919)-846-9467
E-mail Address: icooper(csandec.com
Pagc 3 of' 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Park at Langston
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0679490224
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located east of West
Lake Rd (SRI 387) west of Bells Lake Rd. (SR 1386), approximately one mile south of Ten-
Ten Rd (SR 1010) near Cary Wake County NC.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 703500i1E 39 39750mN
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct water
body.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The site
is completely forested
7. Property size (acres): +/- 32
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Middle Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is provide
roadway and sewer access for a residential subdivision.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy machinery
typically associated with roadway construction and sewer line construction will be used for
this project.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Land use is primarily residential and
forested with patchy agricultural areas nearby.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the site in fall 2000, and a detailed
wetland delineation in April 2002, which was submitted to the USACE for approval on May 20`n
2002 Data forms for the delineation are attached. NC-DWQ confinned S&EC's Neuse River
Buffer evaluation (NBRRO 01-199-see attached). No permits or jurisdictional determinations
have been issued for the project at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional permit requests are anticipated for the project in the future.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)

Impact I (road Fill 0.003 No 0 ft. Headwater Forest
crossing)
Impact 2 (sewer Excavation 0.0011 No 0 ft. Headwater Forest
line crossing)
* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local tloodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.feina.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: > 5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.041 acres (0.011 temporary impacts for sewer line
crossing)
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)

Impact 1 (road Fill 85 ft. UT to Middle Creek 4-6 ft. Intermittent
crossing)
Impact 2 (sewer Excavation 20 ft. UT to Middle Creek 4-6 ft. Intermittent
line crossing)
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 105 linear ft. (20 ft.
temporary for sewer line crossing)
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact Area of Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A
Page 6 of l2
T? List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till,
excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The Town of Cary originally required two roadway crossings over the channel where proposed
impacts will occur in order to preserve connectivity within the site-despite our client's
wishes-who understood that the two crossings conflicted with avoiding and minimizing
unnecessary impacts to wetlands/waters of the U.S. Thus William Barker (our client), S&EC,
and a project engineer from CH Engineering met with Bob Zarzecki of NC-DWQ in January to
discuss the crossing requirement. After this meeting, the project's land planner and engineer
were able to convince Cary to drop one of the required roadway crossings, leaving the one
proposed in this application, which is necessary to access high ground in the northeastern portion
of the property. Additionally, DOT has relaxed the minimum turn radius requirement for the
extension of Alphawood Drive (see impact map) in order to minimize Neuse River buffer
impacts The proposed road crossing (Impact 1) has been designed to cross the stream channel at
a perpendicular angle to minimize impacts The proposed sewer line crossing (Impact 2) also
has been designed to cross the stream wetland area and buffer perpendicularly to minimize
impacts.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 7 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and stream
channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and compensatory mitigation to offset
unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts exceed the requirements for notification.
The proposed roadway crossing is necessary in order to access high ground in the northeastern
portion of the property. This road is an extension of a stubbed road on the western property line,
and crosses the stream perpendicularly, impacting as little channel as possible. The sewer line
crossing is necessary to provide all portions of the property with sanitary sewer access. A large,
contiguous bottomland hardwood forest wetland in the middle of the property has been
completely avoided as have all other wetlands/waters of the U.S. onsite.
NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for wetland and stream channel impacts
below 1 acre and 150 linear feet of significant channel. Because the roposed cumulative
impacts resulting from the project total 0.0411 acres (0.011 temporary)/ 105 linear ft. (20 ft.
temporary-i a less than 1/3 acre and 150 ft) wetland or stream channel mitigation should not
be required
Page 8 of 12
Additionally NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for buffer impacts if they do
not exceed 1/3 acrc per buffered channel tributary. Because the proposed buffer impacts
resulting from the project do not exceed the aforementioned threshold
(9,983 ft 2 or 0.229 acres) buffer mitigation should not be required. Because the proposed sewer
line corridor will cross the riparian buffer perpendicularly and is less than 40 ft. wide it is
considered an "exempt" activity by the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules, and should not
require riparian buffer mitigation.
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http_//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wry/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)9.
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
Page 9 of 12
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Neuse )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following infortation:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 6,291 3.0 N/A
2 3,692 1.5 N/A
Total 9,983 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stonnwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage on the site is not expected to exceed 30% (see attached calculation tables
from project engineer); therefore a stormwater plan should not be required.
X1I. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to an existing sanitary sewer casement
Page 10 of 12
X111. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules`?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
,5/ 2- ?
Applicat
(Agent's
Si
Date
is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
Pagc I I of 12
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Ilertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Ilyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Maywood McDowell Yancey
Pagc 12 ol'12
Oct 09 01 05:20P SPAULDING&NORRIS, PA [phone]
09/13/2001 17:013 9198469467
FAX, TO : ? l M CJ)OVtr s?
S&EC
PAGE 04
Environmental Consultants, PA
Rom a,aleigh, North CAro)int 27614 • rhcmc: [phone] Fax (919) R46-00
www,Sal-JEC.com
AGpNT AT-rrHOR12A.TiON FORM
Ail Blanks To Be Filled In By The Currelnt Landowne
Name:
Address: 1 40 arc.-- ?><. - . - - -
Project Nilule/ Description:
Date: -
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington DistriCt
I'.Q_ Box 1890
Wilm±+tgton, NC 28402
Attn: i ? es
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands Related Consalting and Permitting
Te Wbom it may Concern:
I, the cux-rent ro . owner, hereby designate and autho'ze Soil & Tulviroruxrental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request any of
supplemental infonnation in support of applications, etc. from thus day forward. The
T A.
is notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerrung the agent for this projeL
h
NOTICE: Thip au.thr-rzation,, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, its vapid Only for
,government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&BC staff. You should CAD S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the sate..
W k
print property OwoeVs Name
M. Mr. John Domey
NCDtNR - T)WQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh NC 27604
_ u?-S??L
property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. James Cooper
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
P.1
gip 910 F Bxostooll n R Ro
Sh ss i?as?
oa
S:har ce• d
rM8 2C 1, 30201 Pro5pcrity Clwrch Road 3817.[' Lewndikk Drive ,rayloovtlic, NC 28681
z5•'
(,hwlvtta, NC 28269 7197 chtftstnro, NC 27455 WORM
Phone: [phone] Phme! [phone] Y1,X. ( 62R 6_.. 823) 635-5320
pn, • [phone] Fix. [phone] f ax
t , ,,•,'V. r j;.1;1r I. ` \', ',111
i s ) s" I A
,
USGS SITE MAP (LAKE WHEELER/APEX QUADS)
y '' 1Q?(I I f,? , . _ ? t \ -?? r ( !t t (' ,...I>J ? n )'` , ' ? I?l?` v 1 ¦
\\r\ ..'?,r 0"' \ r \ -~' (\J , i ii i` j t „fps, /'1? .J 1r/ /t l{I? \J / Ct % L`J ?' a?nJ\\/?/t
???1\? ,?. ? / / ?: ?t_. ? r. 5:% I . / / •(1?W. ' j ? . l 1(? \i e _ ,/ \ ?i h?\,, ! ?,
1 l1 / j \ '.? =7 / j ? \ ? ) 1 ? I ? -11 \ 443' ? , ( ? II \\ .)
I I I ?
1
32
° 1 I e \' 400 1
\ : 1 ? ! ? _ i ? ' '; r / ? ?? • ?' / ?' t ?? { ( 1 is
4i A/ 'll l?•?: r -/ ? ill
1
rai#r
. I
`/ ? ; ?j I (? i f / \, ii j ??. it ?I j ? l 1 ? ` C _ / ?/ ? t Y - • i _• ,J - _ `
`'t'\)-?11 `•\, 'i ??//?i? ?/1 ?. ?`?'/•, t ? ,? ?y('?,??J 1 `?? ? I •\"1 •j \?rj? a1_.i
; // f. ((? ? t ( .'/ l ?? ),/ ` n I l \ ? `\ t \ ` rl ., ? • ?,.//. \?' ?/-1, ??
,
i
\; h?,? ?A ?? '? r??i l ,?/ r ?I( ? ?v a 1??? h? ?' ?' ? ? ? ••y i( ? "i ??e ???
%i,fiil) of
`/J u. i,% / .? {•• ??{?<??J?I jII{ ,//??? iit ?.: /f?..l\\? `\\.-\..`\_`- ?\? (t ( //r ?? -1 ( t r?? 4 // +`/
-
1.,? If G , f • y...• ? , , j
- '--.. \ .... ..,, - f+, Don
\
412
-doo
rA. WOE,
j
I
I \ _
_ ?.. - ....) i ..7 ??? )/./11,i=-\?,{+.Ct (? t ?r\\I i'.; \. -? :«, ` -'.i/r? ._Tj;;; ;/ - / ,.? •.. \_,t ?/
iff ( ? -n
146
, ,?1 f I ?\J I' \
ll 1 - : Ctj - i I _? Y? I
f?rail Fr / I, -i"
WAKE C,ourY7Y, fdr_;RTH CAROU NA ;ii-',ET NUMBER 84
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC iob# 5968) Date: 4/18/02
Applicant/Owner: W.T. Barker Realty
Investigator: Jim Cooper County: Wake
State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: BLH Forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? -Yes X No Transect ID: Wetland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes X No Plot ID: flag 277
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua Shrub FAC+ 11.
4. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotundifolia Vine FAC 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 83.3%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
- -Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
X Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: approx. 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: approx. 12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC iob# 5968) Plot ID: Wetland
cnH c
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Worsham sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Ochraquults Confirm Mapped Type? - Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-3 A 10 YR 2/2 - --- Sand loam
3-12 Bt 10 YR 5/1 7.5 YR 5/6 Few, prominent Sand clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer i n Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
uuCTl AllnC r1CTCDUMATIMI
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes _No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes _No X Yes _No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes _No
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC lob# 5968) Date: 4/18/02
Applicant/Owner: W.T. Barker Realty
Investigator: Jim Cooper County: Wake
State: NC

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Mixed Pine-Hardwood
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? _Yes X No
If needed, explain on reverse. Forest
Transect ID: Upland
Plot ID: 15 ft. u from flag 277
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Quercus rubra Tree FACU 9.
2. Quercus alba T/S FACU 10.
3. Liquidambarstyraciflua Shrub FAC+ 11.
4. Vaccinium stamineum Shrub FACU 12.
5. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 13.
6. Ilex opaca Herb FAC- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC
(excluding FAC- : 28.6%
Remarks: Ilex opaca is present as small saplings
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-
-Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
-Aerial Photographs -Inundated
Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
- -Water Marks
X No Recorded Data Available -Drift Lines
-Sediment Deposits
-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
-Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
-Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
-Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: > 12 (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Delineation Performed By
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
231 16th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina 28601
[phone]
Project/Site: Park at Langston (S&EC iob# 5968) Plot ID: Upland
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: well-drained
(Series and Phase): Appling sandy loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Topic Kanhapludults -Confirm Mapped Type? _ Yes - No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Conc retions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-2 A 10 YR 3/3 -- -- Sand loam
2-5 E 10 YR 414 --- -- Sand loam
5-12 Bt 10 YR 4/6 -- --- Clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol -Concretions
_
_Histic Epipedon -High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_Aquic Moisture Regime -Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WFTI ANnS nFTFRMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? -Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? -Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? -Yes X No
Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Yes X No
Remarks:
FROM CH ENGINEERING PHONE NO. : 9198486761
ENGINEERING
May 23, 2002
To: Jim Cooper, S&)EC
From: Maha Chambliss, PE rte. 6A V
Re: The Park At Langston Creek Crossing
May. 23 2002 10:40AII P2
This memo is to confirm that the proposed lots 1 through 20 at Park at Langston, which are located
on proposed Tributary Dr. and north east of the proposed creek crossing are landlocked unless the
extension of Alphawood Dr. is allowed. Proposed Tributary Dr. does not extend past our project.
There is a reserved right-of-way and not a dedicated right-of-way north of the termination of
Tributary Dr. on our site. Please be advised that a reserved right-of-way means that the Ownership
of this particular right-of way is still held by the original developer. Also, there is a 50 ft. Colonial
Pipe line right-of-way carrying three major gas transmission lines within the reserved right-of-way.
The extension of Alphawood Dr. will be the only means of accessing the area north east of the
proposed creek crossing.
If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to let me know.
¦ PO Box 30128. Raleigh, NC 27622 • TEL [phone] - FAX 919,788.0232 roms
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
August 15, 2001
Jim Cooper
S & E C, Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, N. C. 27614
?J01
Subject: Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules i.
NBRRO 01-199
The Park at Langston
S & E C Project #01-5968
Wake County
Dear Mr. Cooper:
This letter is being sent to serve as confirmation of your buffer determination at the project referenced by
the Raleigh Regional Office as NBRRO 01-199. The features represented on the Wake County Soils and
the USGS Lake Wheeler and Apex Quad maps were evaluated to determine their subjectivity to the Neuse
Buffer Rule on July 2, 2001. It was determined that there a total of five features depicted on the property
on the two maps. Three features are subject to riparian buffer protection and are labeled as A, B, and C on
the plat map received August 10, 2001.
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy; Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Areas, Administrative Code T15A:02B.0233
(NCAC 0233). For information on wetlands and other impacts, please contact someone at the Central Office
at 733-1786. Thank you for your attention to this matter and if this Office can be.of any assistance or if you
have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sin rely,
Steve Mitchell
Environmental Scientist
cc: RRO/John Dorney
Wake County
l l:\nbrlet. for\neuse.buf\buf01 \l angston.199
Alm ?M? W, A
;Ikk
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
z
c
f
U
r
r
O
Ln
W
a-
0
O
w
O
O
O
03
r
ru
r
103
m
r
.o
i?
i
ca
O
F
?o Z
' S
°O
J
m0
AOZ
Ell
Y? ? r
V
Z
y
D
0CA
0?

o° ? N
r cn
G J
9?
W N cJo
N W CO
M Z r, ?
r
w?
WETLAND IMPACT AREA
O =
M U 0%O1
C3 W W
wawa
L-f F- L?
U
Z
Q ?
L
~ Z J
U
Q Q Q
F- J W
Q_
W
~ Z ? ?
Q
z ~ Y W
Y

J ^^
,,
Q
M
w
LJ.J
3 W
=
L--
EJECT ND AJ002 SHEET
NEUSE RIVER BUFFEFTD 05-20-2002 W-2
N NEUSE RIVER BUFFEFAWN+ CEK ECKED, CEK
- VET WETLAND AREAS DEL:ALE+ 1' = 40' SHEET ?F
W
3
GREEN
JE LN
LD
Z
C?
W
W
z
LD
Z
W
U
z
na
Q?
?- z J
U Q Q
Q
J L,J
CL ry
? Q
r)l
Q W
zcj? V
QQry
J CL Q
J J
3z
AJO02
05-20-2002
CEK
CEK
1' = 200'
W-1
VICINITY MAP
Wetlands-Tracking

Facility Name Park at Langston ;;..
Project Number 02 0831
Project Type purpose of residential I County Wake
Location UT to Middle Creek Cary I ` 5 County2
Received From APP ° COE ID # ? ? ' Region ", Raleigh
Received Date May 24, 2002 COE Susp Date .JI ?
Reg. Contact
Sent to Region Date DCM Susp Date
0 L, IN.
iotil
Rcvd Region Date T TIP Number Payment Date 7/29/2002
Last Action Date''August 12, 2002 More Info Requested Amount Paid $200.00
Last Action Issue General More Info Re r
calved 7/29/2002
Payor S & EC
Latitude (ddmmss), Mitigation ? Check # 15733
Longitude (ddmmss), _ COC Received Date J w c .

Wetlands Tracking s
d
Facility Name Langston Subdivision
Project Number 00 1103 E
Project Type purpose of I=. !- County Wake
Location County2
Received From COE ID # I? `Region Raleigh
JI
Received Date COE Susp Date! Reg. Contact'
Sent to Region Date DCM Susp Date, P6,10 ` 1 tl N F
Rcvd Region Date TIP Number Payment Date
Last Action Date May 2, 2002 More Info Requested. Amount Paid T=
Last Action= Withdrawn More Info Received ' ? i° Payor
Latitude (ddmmss) Mitlgation ? ! Check #
Longitude (ddmmss) COC Received Date - t ?„ ,

I
1 , 4n1.
??zr
Subject: Park ua Langsuon S/D
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:00:38 -0500
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Jim,
John's first reaction was to avoid the larger crossing (the one you did
not know the name of) and cul-de-sac both ends. I told him that this
crossing was required by both the County and Cary. I would recommend
sending the PCN in as soon as possible to get the review process
started. We may want to get all parties involved to meet, but go ahead
and send it in so we can get started.
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
-qqqq
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
X19-733-9726
2321 Crabtree Blvd (office address) 1650 Mail Fax: [phone]
Service Center (mail address) Work: 919-733-9726
Raleigh
NC
27669-1650
Additional Information:
Version 2.1
f \
!\ 1 ? J II- ?/- i
1
t:3
?/?? o
--
12
l-
1
l
-r
dip
" "-
' i lif�3 �'.. ��Y °% "'\R.� ., t`r',Y.i �• . S.t a`*1iF+ v'r'tt �`�-'4 / „
All
An
r • i • .��
°'~� t�,�,6^ 0,..v^C.• ti f �j�. r. �M, �.o' � .TT
.��p, y,�-�.� 1Q("d„C�;:. a t( � 'T%:• � f �, I � 'iv�'_ e:� .•:sr"'� '��
Iwo
ry
. r ;� ��.�,I � :,�� `Nay"� � %��,a� �'�► ���ar'``�
IN
�l �+. ��. j 14 J / • f+.L
7K 41
' � �'�f' yy�'1 ' H�r .•"i l+s;Ql1C1• i2 '••1 ..r ,
w"Y t.+, :kms s ;{-tF �• i1 "� \ -� Y
1 /
14
taX'
` �M1,Y s ,:q '1 � �:•;��',C .���A�r., ����, ,�+F'_.�r '�Ak, { / ��r(�'�,� �,A�f �. .ar_.••,. � e�' .�'�/«�rY-.
�"T:? 'Sr .J(�'s'rn�rl; �. �•� ?�.: �qyi,:• ' 6�th., fe„"7�i "' �'1}.. � �Iy+f.:/

r = m = = = = = A m = r w = = = m
y ,? , i I I
/
/
i
i
,
i I
1
I
l
w ,
I
,
I 1 i; l;?i 1 i I \1
I a? /',11` ? I II I I
I ,
I
i
L .
^
^
I
,- -
?
.R
- - - - - -- - - - --- - -
? I
? Cl
w\
,
1 1
ti
,t
m = = m m = m = r m w

SR

_ 1387
`
W
x

x e
_
\ / x

GVO8
? ? / / I III 1 _ -
C:? CD
\---\
O \
CD,
I
boo
\ as[ - I m
\ o o
cyl
,CD
I II -
/ / / (n (A \ \ - / - -- /

WEST
LAKE
ti
z
z ti
-1 r Z
v
3 ? D gyn.,
D m ? ?1
O
O t7
X C
c o
'
?
BELL
S LAK
m
?
r
z m
m
z
d
<
.? N ® z
m
H
Z
m
-- ------ ---- --- ------------------ --
I IF
--
1 ?
I
I i ? I
Al

r t1/ - I
r
i
\
? b
1 t
1
11 r'1 & i

I. %' 1 !

O 1
? .
` ??• flgIbl
? •?
_ 1
?v .

O '
1

OPTIMIST RIDGE ROA
---------

O
O
O
r Ul
• I
N
II O
I D
N L
o n n O O
(T1 m O O
O X A N ro

WETLAND IMPACT MAP
THE PARK AT LANGSTON N FARING
BARKER REALTY lmmb?l
+?+I
?J

M M M M

r N ? r
D M M D

d d

M ?T1
D D
?
C C -I
TI -9
M M M M

1--I 20 ;a ?
z D

D? 3 3 Y ??
?
ty ?-1 nI + ?p /
bid D D ? ,?6k / l
D D
go
n I I
In Em -
N 4
i
N " a
n
?ANN
N 4
cnN"?b
Na Co r-
vi
0
0
N
O
-A
0
N
4g+
PpTSt?

4?j,,
/ /
Az
o /
PR1p,N
4828. "
g•
4 ++
a /
a
04

i
Soo
L A- o
?
Q
0 n t =f tJ -0
Q
n = ? D ?
D rI D -I ? WET
r n :c m L-
r? 7-, z -• r-I
m n
d --A
•• o
cn z
I ?

o _

I D
n n n

m
M 0 0
o 00

r'1
m
? -1
? n 1
I i

WETLAND IMPACT MAP
INSET
THE PARK AT LANGSTON
BARKER REALTY
Q

?<v
??p09
PRA` PRA PS Q?
?P1'
\1
r-i Qv y-
D 4v
4J
O

.F
ENGINEERI r PO BOX 30128
`-RALEIGH, NC 2762
TELE 919, 788, 022
FAX 919. 788, 023
'This certifies that this cop o/ this plat identifies os waters of the U.S, or wetlands all areas of waters of the U.S, Y
GRAHAM including wetlands, regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined 6y the undersigned on this NEwroN RD. date. Unless fhero is a change in !aw or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction mo s of
relied upon for o period not fo exceed rve years (ron this date. This determination was made utiliing the 1987 Corp Enginee floods Delineati Monuol,'
TEN TEN RD. D INSET 'A' NOT 1n SG4l.E
Nome
D~ Tltle
LANCSTON TRUELOVE Date O~~l~ I1~ W CIRCLE DR. (RESERVED 60' R/W) .
~ B.M. 1983, PC. 1276
3
3~ 50' COLONAL MAPLE SITE m o ~ PIPELINE E4SEMENT
BOTTOM DR. ALPHAW000 ~ a; W h (SEE NOTE i) n n
DR. ~ O
O O ~ O ~ ~ tih \
OPTIMIST FARM o ~ 2 2 ~ 2 w o o ~ ~ o ~ ~ LINE HEATER JANES LAKE RD. ~ ~ 2 m o ~ O 2 ~ p ~ ~ 2 i o ~ ~ \ ti ~ ~ D.B. 8173, PG. 2694 Z m o ~ A o~ 2 i o o v, 0 0 0 ; ~ 50 COLONIAL LOT 13
zip o i o ~ o o m 2 o w PfPEUNE Ei4SE~fENT ) OXFORD GREENf SUBDNSION p ~ v ~ o ~ o ~ V ~ m ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ I \ CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DALTON SEE NOTE 1 , M, 1 gg3 PG. 19
qZ mbA~pD °v'~rrA~cv„2 ~oc.~r*~Orny bc,+ntti,o D.B. 8695, PG. 2037 ( B m o A r v~ ^t p e A e w r1 a ~ nt o= o m ~ T ~ LOT 15 PIN N0. 679.01-49-6956 14
vm~~~2 mw~ly;o~ 2~w ~ ~U e w ~ y o 0 2 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ` I o ~ v ~ ~ OXFORD GREENE SUBDIVISION , O ~ n ~~~N r ,.D N V) I c~2~ n1 a C r B.M. 1983, PG. 1276 143-2
NO SCALE w° I~~~~U w C A VICINII 1 MAP ~ A I ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ A `D " ~ o w ~ PIN N0. 770.03-40-4004 h ~ G45 LINE I~ (n c~ k In C O ~o C I N O V I N O ti cn , h 141 140-2 144-3 591-39
e~m bwo ~roo o~ erns eo erns a. 30 30' h Op V < 139-3 592-38
brno 4~ A~~ `v°°'~ ~ O 2 REBAR 572 138-4 145-4 p1..
W p O 2 ~ 2 2 REBAR FOUND 3 573-253 2 REBAR 2 REBAR !PF FOUND N 89'1630„ E 1118.18 IPF 207.76 FOUND 228.45 327-4'CH FD~ 590-40 146-5 ~ " 593-37
FOUND 0.00 0.00 116.47 159.40 REBAR 324-4'CH IPF 114.53 116.52 115.03 FOUND 328-6'CH 323-6'CH 29-55'CH 574-254 J 137-5 47 ~ 49 0
322-5'CH 30-6CH 100 a 150-7
37h1-~'C 75-255 32 -8 C 31 ,8'H 136-6 135-7
319-6'CH 332 6 C REBAR
~ 333-6'CH 576-256 FOUND HEATER UTILITIES, INC. 100 RIPARIt1N Bf1fFER 318-6'CH 34-6'CH 151-8 2 530-23 134-8
D.B. 6559, PG. 554 (FROM EICH 510E TOP OF BANK) 317-6'C 2 316-7'CH 335-7'CH ~ WELL LOT 315-4'CH 577-257'
LANGSTON SUBDIVISION 311-10'CH 314-4'CH ~ 529-23A 531-248 152-9 A p a. . 133-9
B.M. 1995, PG. 104 ~ 310-3'C 336-4'CH a? ~ 312 ~4'CH H O PIN N0. 679.01-39-4751 ~ 343041- CH 2 153-10
N 309-4~CC 313-4,'CH 578- 8 ~ o 34 -4'G 33393 4'CH H (TDP OF 84NX) A a 8-24A • 532-258 54 - 4 52 132-10 516 3
308-4 CH- 343-4'CH 307-5 C 344-5'CH . 100'306-8'CH 345-8'CH 579-259 517-35 518-36
. s s~~ WETLAND AREA A-5 ~ p ~ 521-25A 533-268 !r`;
305-54'C 346-5'CH 560-260 ~ ~ 589 1.216 ACRES w 53-25~ 04-6'CH S ~ p ~ w ~ ~ ~s ~ .y ~s 159 - \ 160 15 526-26A 534-278 155-11 ~ 125-15
347-6'~H ~s o• sd 303-4'CH 3g448g-4g~CH ~ ~ 52-251 3o2-6"CH 581=281 s~ ism • 131-11 v 161-i6 525-27A F;,
~ 301-4' 350-4'CH s ~ 395-3'C 396 IPF 1 ~ "56-1 ~6\ 124-)6
\ 51-250 300-,4~H 351-4'CH ~ ms 397 TOMMY ALLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 299 4 CH 582-26 ~ 535-288 , p ry9ry 157-13
D.B. 8696, PG. 297 IPF ~ 352-4'CH ~ 394-4'CH 98=3'CH WETLAND AREA C-7 10-249 353-4'CH P~ 401- 'CH 399 4;CH LOT 57 ° THE PARK AT LANGSTON, INC. 4g-248 98-a'CH ro~ 391-3' 39 -5 CH 'S~Dg~ q0 128 123-17 162-17
DIVISION ~ D.B. 8680, PG. 414 354-4'C~ 355-8 CH r -4'CH 393 LANGS70N SUB IPF 0.005 ACRES 4 297-4 ~ 390 Opp-5'CH DELTA EPSILON OF B.M. 1995, PG. 104 B,M. 1971, PG. 48 296-8 ~ 389-3'CH n 9 ry i 127-13 N ~ y~, 570-318
_ _ PIN N0. 679.01-49-0224 48-247 295-TCH 356-TCH h 388-3'CH 0 -4 CH .SIGMA CHI, INC. PIN N0. 679.01 39 3575 524-28A 122
387-4'CH 404-3'CH D.B. 1583, PG. 708 $gg4 4'CH 357-4'CH 5-3'CH TRACT 4 47- 46 2 3-9 CH 386-3'CH 6-4'CH CARROL FARM 523-29A 569-3281;,-. 163 '-'~1~"~ 164-19 165-21
292-5 CH 10 iAi 9 -5 CH _ ' H - 409-4 CH B.M. 1960, PG. 204 r` . J,~ ~ n
~ 46-2 5 36055'CHC I. 384-5'CH PIN N0. 679.01-49-8326 29 -4'CH 410-5'CH 515. 522-30A~ o a a m ry~ 166-6'CH
42 " W LAND AREA C-2 361-4'CH ND AREA A-4 3s2-s'cH w URA L. BROWN 41 WETLA 28 -5'CH )N~T 14 26 01 N 521-31A 121 ~ N 520-32A •
.008 ACRES 36.3'c 0.8. 8600, PG. 1346 1.270 ACRES 51_27 n 45-244 88-3'CH ? M 117-6'CH
T N SUBDIVISION RIPARIAN BUFFER / 36 -3'CH 512-271 ~ O LANGS 0 (FROM EICH SIDE TOP OF BANK) 26 -~'CH
B.M. 1995, PG. 104 44-243 38 _~C 511-272 PIN N0. 679.01-39-4453 286 3 CH 3 CHANNEL AREA IPF
CHANNEL AREA 43-242 510-273 PF ~ ~ 0,039 ACRES
M 0.087 ACRES 4.24, p9-274 2 g ~ ' ~
n1 N 166-6' H 277- 'C 429-8'CH c0 R/~ N 41-tap -
~ 117-6'C 1 7-6'CH 276-5'C 430-~'CH 506-275 N / N ~ 275-6'CH 431-6CH O
OD DRIVE ~ N 116-6'CH ALPHAWO - 274 Cpl 432....-~'CH 50 -276 ~
(50 R/W) i ~ WETLAND AREA C-6 39- 38 , ~ 1 ~ B.M. 1995, PG. 104 R~ m 273 5'CH 433-5'Ck - RES 506-2T
• WETLAND AR C 3 0.008 AC 38-237 ~ 272-s' H 434-s'cH WETLAND AREA A-3
H B. EARNHARDT N 0.028 ACRES 37-236 5p5- 78 ELIABET 481 PG. 436 ~ AREA C-8 271-s'C 435-6'CH 0.740 ACRES D. B. 6 o WETLAND AREA C 4 WETLAND
LOT 55 n 0.023 ACRES 36.23 ~ _4~° 436-a'CH 5p4-2 9 LANGSTON SUBDIVISION w ~ 0, 001 ACRE 27p
B.M. 1995, PG. 104 ~ - 269-5' 437-5'CH ~PAIHAIII
PIN NO. 679.01-39-4244 O 35-234 268-5' 38-5'CH 503-280 B~ ~ AREA 266-6'CH 39-8'CH EMI SIDE d CHANNE 34-23 + 441-6;CH 440-6'CH ~ ~ ~ 4
p 0.020 CRES 28-227 ~ 255-6 Ck _ - - NAT 1n ~.i°,' -
502-261 ~O 27_226 33-232 264-5'CM Z PF W D AREA C-5 29-22 = 442-5'CH 167-327 p SEE PAGE 7N'0 OF TWO FOR CHANNEL W1DTN5 h
JEFF HODGE 0 023 ACRES 32-231 ~ t-282 116-327
D.B. 6921, PG. 167 26-225 30-229 31-230 ~ 143-5'CH LOT 54 WETLAND AREA C-7 25_224 ~ 263-5'CH
LANGSTON SUBDIVISION 60 N 262-5'CH B.M. 1995, PG. 104 0.015 ACRES X444-~'CH , - - ~ i 261-4 CH 221-151 2'CH 222-151 2'CH 168
PIN N0. 679.01 39 4142 ° RIPARIAN y 445-4'CH 115 169 23-150 2'CH 114
~ FROM ETCH SIDE TOP OF BANK) 00 499-283 ( e IPF 220-150 2'CH 170-20 224-149 8"CH 113-20
INSET '8 20-221 / a 498-284 , WETLAND AREA C-9 86-6'CH 455-6'CH 80884 L. tANGSTON _219-149 B"C 225-148 y r • X218-148 ~ 0 a
- a56-s'CH ° D.B. 2046, PG. 4f 497-286 ~ PIN N0. 679.01-49-7051 A ~ 00 ti6 ~A6 h a ~ ~
1 -219 64-4'CH 457-4'CH ~ WETLAND AREA C 10 63-s'cH 458-s'cH 217-14 a ~ va ^i ^ ryry
IPF ~ IPF ~ IPF 0.024 ACRES ,7.2,6 ~ 486.26, 216-146 ~ ry~ ryp i ^ y ^ ry i ry
. ryry "0 ry 00 0' ^ Ky ry ~ ~ 0 00• ^ • ~ ^ry ~ ^ k
16-217 62-12'CH 459-12'CH JAMES DAVID WALKER 495-288 ^y~ 213-143 ry~ h~ ry 212 ry ^
D.B. 6665, PG. 539 aso-s'cH , 1-6'CH 537-144A 542-1428 232-141 543-1418 00; Oo
LOT 53 15-21s 6o-a'cH 461-4'CH WETLAND AREA A-2 LANGSTON SUBDIVISION 462-4' H , 4 4-289 210-14 536-143A 544-1408 ~ ~a
B.M. 1995, PG. 104 79-4'CH 46~-9 ~H Do' 0.753 ACRES PIN N0. 679.01-38-4946 ~ u-215 7a-9'C 1 g o Ory 539-142A 4234 3139 ^ 0 0 i
° 77-TCH 64-7'CH 493-290 ~ , 540-ta1A A/ ^i0 3 -138 ~y^~~rym a°0 ,y 541-140 ^ m 236-137 ~ ~ ~ 0
76-5'CH 465-5'CH a 13-214 75-6'CH 466-6'CH A. EARL TRUELOVE 20233404D Op ; 237-136 yyy°`y~ OOi ^yy0 ry ^py0a •
74-5'CH 467-5'CH 492-291 D.B. 2030, PC. 289 ry ~ ~ 204-136 y y y y~ ~ ~ ^o O0 ~ O o oy . 203-135 y y ~ i ^°0 ny ry ry0 ry 38-135 yy~m o~ i i ^ry~ 0 ° ^ 178-105
468-5'CH PIN NO. 619.01-48-5780 100' RIPARWV 12-z13 a7oa7~~~'cH as1-2s2 n 549-137A "l~; ~ ~ ~ yyryry~~ 0 ^ryry o' n 105-105 28-227 ~P r yy0~! i ^ o a 3J 232 '
BUFFER 73-5'CH 4026jrCH aNo (FROM FACH SIDE TOP OF BANK) 11_412 469-6'C 73-6'CH ~ 548-136A ~ , 0 ~Ar, _ ry"a`O ~ ~ i ~ 104-106 27-226 F y~:
72-g6'~CHH r, 490-293 r ' 7169-TCH \ 547-135A ^ ~ 0`O ro a 179-106 29-22 546-134 551-1378 aN 103-107 202-134 5~~ ~~¢¢~;ir~ ~ 160-107 186-113 32-231,
WETLAND ARF~1 A-1 sa-s'~H 469-294 3 239-134 ^ a ~ n 81-108 ~ 97-113
IPF 1.276 ACRES 10-2" 67 ; s cH 474-5 C ~ A. EARL TRUELOVE Fr 66-6'CH 75-6'CH 488-295 N D.B. 2030, PG. 290 i ^y a ~ I ~ ~ 182-109 ~ 26-225 31-230 ^o ry o o N a~ ~ ao ~ 30-229 ry0a M "ry^ "i m^ ~ 1 ~ ~ n~~ o .0 187-114
JESSIE RUTH M. POWEIL D.B. 8568, PG. 2047 9_210 476-4'CH 77-6'CH ^ TRACT 3 65-4'CH 479-7,96 t7 CARROL FARM ry ~ j ~ m l I I a N I 96-114 ao t` z
WELL 10T 64-6CH 478-6 CH rya ryOryKry ~ ~ ~ a ~ o a 188-115 ! 25-224 t.+' ~ ~ 0 o °oN 95-115 rn ~ N a N
(ANGSTON SUBDIVISION 8_Y09 63-6'C iv B.M. 1960, PG. 204 B.M. 1995, PG. 104 00 7-208 62-a'CH 480-4'CH ~ PIN N0. 679.01-48-5780 h I~ ^ a ~ 258-10'CH . N a I O I N ~ ~ y N
PIN N0. 679.01-38-4715 a "i ' ~ ~ ' s1-5'cH 461-s'cH CHANNEL AREA 6-2p7 - ~ 6p-6'CH .0.244 ACRES m~ ~ N a n 'D n 257-2'CH - ~ ~ ~ 'Dn- ^m 24-223. _
482-6'°H 5-206 ~ U I I I I H~ .N 256-4'CH 48-10'CH ro ~ N a s III rn ~ 23 a 449-2'CH I
59-9'CH 463-9'CH 193-120 ' ~ ~ u`Di mrn°~' I I ' 255-6'CH .r,.,' 'O m 249-121 0 254-6'CH '.r,,, a
4-205 ~ ~ ) X58-9'CH ~a i ~0 464-9'CH 90-12 2 N 450-a'CH a \ 253-5'CH 21-222 - N '86-12
LIGHTWOOD N 8 ' ' „ STAKE 3 58 O6 W IPF 2_20 3-204.. 57-8'CH 485-8'CH - ~ 252-6'CH 451-6'CH 20 221 ao ' 251-4'C 452-6'CH
197,78 1 87-4'CH 453-5'CH
INC. N ~ ~ 56-6'CH 486-6'CN MAJEWSKI ENTERPRl5582 84 02 20 W 781 ' D.B. 8382, PG. 50 86-6'CH ~ ~a; 454-6'CH
TRACT i IPF ~ s 'r" i o ~ 66-6'CH 455-8'CH ' '
B.M. 1985, PG. 1367 PIN N0. 679.01-48-3282 S 84'02'20" E 099g~4B5'SSJ2'W t4,7O5„Tg~ CRID 456-6'CH
F.B. WEST, et al PIN NO. 679.01-38-9346 86.64 ' IPF C04lBJNED D.B. 5481, PG. 568 CRID FACTOR 4.707.10 GROUND
D.B. 860, PG. 187 N.C. GRID COORDS. PIN N0. 679.01-27-9795 N=698,474.702
iC~ E=2,074,556.986 N.C.C.S. "McCUL1ER5'
~T ~ VALE 384-5'CH 410-5'CH ~ 9J 360-5'CH w N.C. CRID COORDS.
290-4'CH _4~ H i - , . . , N=697,429.872 361 C E~2,089,225.214 a
r, ~3~ J~ 10p 514-269
289-5'CH 362-5'CH ~ ~ q - r ~ ~ 0 ~ 3 Jr.
' 363-3'CH ` s ' ti 5 J ti Oh ~ n v o 513-270
J. y v~ ~j ~ 'S 412-4'CH 288-3'CH Oy d ~ d v.
364-3~CH \u+,`i}. ~ Oy i°~il 287-3'CH ' a20_3'CH ~yny y urvE r~ec~
374-3'CH i ~'1iI• 512-271 286-3'CH L1NE BEARING DISTANCE ~rEs
285-5'CH -3'CH 373-3'CH ~ v~ sp OyPy NOTES: NORTH CAROUIyi 284-4 CH , ' 365 366-5'CH ~ s Ps 511-272 1, CAS LINE STA f CAS L1NE STAKED BY COLONIAL PIPELINE AND FIELD L 1 S 00'23'59 w W 74.01
WAKE CouNTr ze3-5cH ; LOCATED BY N 1 MICHA_fl 0 GOODFRED CERTIFY THAT THIS PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY 282-5'CH "h LOCATED BY KENNETH CLOSE, INC. ON 4-17-02. NOTE L2 N 89' 1116 W 86.55 TERED ON F1RST WETLANDS WERE DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ~~E• Piwc COLONIAL PIPELINE EASEMENT CEN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ze1-s'cH.~: ~r oy °y s1o-z73 COLONIAL P1Pl SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTLW. SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION, CR1PT10N RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE ,THAT ~ 280-5'CH ~ a GAS LINE INS GAS LINE INSTALLED.
D>~a~u un~a~cr Nn>• SURVEYED ARf CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM 426-,5 CH ~ J. / - - -.........w.. n e+I T.1 x11/'1
INFOWZW& FOUND IN BOOK PAGE THAT THE R4 770 427~4'~~~. 509-27 7 ~ ~ LEGOV&
OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS 1 • 4 THAT THIS PUT WAS PREPARED 427 5 gy m' ACCORDANCE p i r WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE 277-5'CH a ~sp~ r•\ (IPF)-IRON PIP R ttltiNfgfff s r Vim. y (IPF)-IRON PIPE FOUND REVISIONS WETLAND DtLINtAIIUIV run KL1V1VL''1t! c,LVar,, 11rc,. Land Surveying
ffr \ ~ y REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 17th DAY OF MAY AD., shy 2002 277-7C ~oyy y y NOTE• -RALEIGH, NC 27607 70 TRINITY 177 ROAD . TON, !NC 9 NGS T LA DTE E PARK A PA TH
RAW ERROR OF Cl D SURVEYOR ~"i DISTRIBUTED BY THE RAW ERROR OF CLOSURE WAS 29,084+, HE DISTANCES ON HIS "AP UTEO ARE BY ADJUSTED THE COMPASS HORIONTMETHOD T PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
THE L y 5oe-275 THIS MM ARE ADVU! RE STR4110N No. L-3278 276-5'CH n 430-5'CH UNLESS NOTED OTHE HIS M~~RULC LATEO 9yS WLESS NOTED OTHERMMSE. ALL SURVEY
31-6 CH / COORDINATE COMPUT 8Ek 275-6'CH TO SURVEYED BY: KW 100RDINATE COMPUUrwN. WNSHIP: SWIFT CREEK/MIDDLE CREEK [COUNTY: WAKE DATE- 4-25-02
S L,g r 432-6 CH 00, 50 0 100 200' 300' STATE.- DRAWN BY: MJB
274-6'CH loQ, 50,
6mmdm 'NoRn~ CAROUnrA SCALE: I" m 100 CHECKED & CLOSURE B r 2 1 I N FEET ZONE. P.l. N: 679.01-49-0224
rfrrrrrrwNtit SCALE Y.-MG SHEET.-