20091294 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090421

f Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table 0 9 1 2 9 4
NC Division of Water Quality
Project Number: EEP134
Project Name: Terrible Creek Buffer Restoration
County(ies): Wake
Basin & subbasin: Neuse 03020201
Nearest Stream: Terrible Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C,NSW
Mitigator Type: EEP/WRP
DOT Status: DOT
Date of Office Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year:
Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: JP -s 34 r.Q K? r ?v
Weather Conditions (today & recent): ' ?tn y) i
Directions to Site:
1. Office Review Information:
Project History
Total Mitiqation on Site
Wetland:
Stream:
Buffer: 45.6 acres
Nutr Offset•
Monitoring reports available?
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No d
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
'Approved mitigation plan available? 1. l
Yes
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
EEP134-1 45.6 acres ? `P Restoration
fi b u--der
Q ?tOLri,?-?-c o r? oror? 4e crU ?w?S sex ue?d
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
ti

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 45.6 acres estoration Component ID: EEP134-1
Description: variety of treatments
Location within project:
III. Buffer Site Details:
Riparian Buffer (Streams Only) Nutrient Offset (Streams or Ditches)
Streams verified by DWQ: Yes O Buffer Width: /VV
Comments:
Total Acres:
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
Buffer Width: 50' 50'
Grandfathered Site? (EEP Only) Yes No
IV. Success Criteria Evaluation:
VEGETATION:
NOTE: Success Criteria is 320 'spa
I
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
Comments:
Total Acres:
Restored Acres:
Enhanced Acres:
Dominant Plant Species
Species Storv TPA/'1o cover
7,5
? ? e--'N 4-U-0V
Date of last planting:
I
Vegetation growing successfully? Ye No
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas and associated stream bank (e.g. bank stability,
overall health of vegetation, etc.)
® o ..?.1 F e fj lnn^\, v
J
cy
\4z -46
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009) Page 1 of 2
Buffer Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
41s
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
Easement Marking Method:
bone, .?rG>( fem. a PJ?
List any remaining issues to address (e.g. plant survival, easement encroachment, etc.):
I
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful not successful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
i
', ? ? • 5 ?c .a : 1 ? - Sin . C? ?? ? s ? I,
Additional Comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Label and attach photos to
this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.2 (March 5, 2009)
r
Page 2 of 2