20200406 Ver 1_No Written Concurrence_20200324

Carpenter, Kristi
From: Ward, Garcy
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:15 PM
To: Rivenbark, Chris; Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Cashin, Gordon E
Cc: Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: RE: [External] RE: BR-0117 in Northampton County
Chris,
I looked over the plans you sent for this one and I don't have a problem with non -reporting as you are staying below the
thresholds listed in GC 4132 and should be able to meet all the applicable conditions.
Garcy Ward
Environmental Specialist
NC Divison of Water Resources
[phone]
From: Rivenbark, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 9:29 AM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Cashin, Gordon E
<[e-mail]>; Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: BR-0117 in Northampton County
Kyle,
I would keep far away from Tom, regardless of current precautionary guidelines Q
Garcy,
Please let us know if you have any concerns about non -reporting for this one. To my knowledge, we're meeting the
criteria.
Chris Rivenbark
NCDOT- Environmental Analysis Unit
[phone]
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 9:22 AM
To: Rivenbark, Chris <[e-mail]>; Cashin, Gordon E <[e-mail]>; Ward, Garcy
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: BR-0117 in Northampton County
I email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
c. ov
Chris,
Doing good here hope you are. Everyone else is teleworking so Tom and I have the run of the
office and social distancing Q. I'm good with moving forward as a non -reporting NW3. Be
1

sure to circle around with Garcy and make sure this fits a non -reporting GC for DWR. If it
doesn't I would like to see a full submittal to both agencies.
Kyle
From: Rivenbark, Chris <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:12 AM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Cashin, Gordon E
<[e-mail]>; Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: BR-0117 in Northampton County
Good morning Kyle,
Gordon is going to be out of the office most of today.
Travis did not request moratoria for this project. Monte has asked us about tracking non -reporting projects on a
spreadsheet for all centrally managed projects and we'll include this one.
I hope you're all doing well and stay safe.
Chris Rivenbark
NCDOT- Environmental Analysis Unit
[phone]
From: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 1:39 PM
To: Cashin, Gordon E <[e-mail]>; Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris <[e-mail]>; Matthews, Monte K CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Monte. K. [e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: BR-0117 in Northampton County
• External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
JWMr—spam2nc.gov
Gordon,
Did you contact NCWRC, Travis Wilson, and see if there are any moratoria that would be
required at this location? Typically Division 1 submits a PCN request for these projects to make
sure everything is covered in case a special condition would be required like a moratorium. If
this doesn't require a PCN submittal be sure to make contact with Division 1 and make sure it
is placed on the non -reporting spreadsheet in case the Corps requests the information for
tracking purposes.
Kyle

From: Cashin, Gordon E <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:06 PM
To: Barnes, Kyle W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Ward, Garcy <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rivenbark, Chris <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] BR-0117 in Northampton County
Kyle and Garcy,
We are all set to submit the permit application for BR-0117, Bridge No. 52 over Gumberry Swamp on SR 1313 in
Northampton County. BR-0117 will also be replaced on the existing alignment while detouring traffic offsite.
The drawings from Hydraulics shows a total of <0.01 acre of fill, 0.02 acre of excavation and 0.05 acre of mechanized
clearing. They are also showing <0.01 acre of permanent surface water impacts, 12 feet of permanent channel impacts
and 106 feet of temporary because they appear to be counting the already bridged stream banks as channel impacts. I
don't think any actual channel is being lost, but that is for y'all to say I guess. We received confirmation today that
Utilities does not anticipate any impacts to waters or wetlands.
We would prefer to handle this as a non -written NW 3, if possible. I have attached the drawings for your review, and
also the final CE checklist, Utility narrative, and NRTR for your reading pleasure.
Please let us know how you would like to proceed.
Regards,
Gordon Cashin
Environmental Program Consultant
NCDOT Environmental Analysis Unit
[phone]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.