20200427 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200327

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200427
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Structure 106 Improvements
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Pamela Kistner
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/27/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.814816-78.610105
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
42 - Recreation Facility
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
V Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
BOM 1977 PG 574 & BOM 1964 PG 204
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
222 West Hargett Street
Address Line 2
PO Box 590
City
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Cade
27601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
State / Rovince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
3a. Name:
David Bender

3b. Business Name:
City of Raleigh Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources
3c.Address
Street Address
222 Hargett Street
Address tine 2
City
Slate / Province / Pagion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27601
USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Pamela Kistner
4b. Business Name:
Devberry Engineers
4c.Address
Street Address
2610 Wycliff Road
Address Line 2
Suite 410
City
Slate / Province / Pagion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27607
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
pkistner@dev�berry.com
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization Form 2020.pdf 20.48KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
1715524007 & 1715527746
20.67+22.92
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Pagion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
(buntry
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Crabtree Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NS W

3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
An existing earth sanitary sewer easement follows a tributary to Crabtree Creek to the north and east of the existing Crabtree Creek Trail. The sanitary sewer easement is cleared and
has an active sewer main with 5 manholes along the tributary and a gravel access road that extends from the end of Ratchford Drive in a 40' easement. The existing asphalt roadway
extends from Capital Blvd to the sanitary sewer easement for approx. 1600 LF.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS NC —Raleigh —East Map.pdf
3.19MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Web_Soil_Map.pdf 497.07KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.11
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1250 LF & 1100 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project purpose is to realign a portion of the existing Crabtree Creek Trail (wooden boardwalk structure) that has failed in 3 locations, and to relocate the greenway trail from of the
floodway of Crabtree Creek. Moving the existing section of greenway trail will also result in a safer structure for the public and increase the longevity of the trail and decrease
maintenance.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project is a re -alignment of the existing Crabtree Creek trail that includes Structure 106, an approximately 1,150 feet long boardwalk located along the steep bluffs of
Crabtree Creek. This section of trail has failed three times and is presently closed. The realignment Will replace approximately 1,150 linear feet of the existing wooden boardwalk
section, by realigning the Crabtree Creek Trail as an asphalt path along Ratchford Drive, then along an existing City of Raleigh sanitary sewer easement before tying into the existing
greenway farther north of the existing failed Structure 106. The asphalt path along Ratchford Drive will be placed within the public right of way from the Capital Boulevard crossing to the
existing terminus of Ratchford Drive north. The asphalt greenway will continue to the end the existing Ratchford Drive right -of way, where it will then followthe existing sanitary sewer
access drive (within a 40' existing easement), crossing two unnamed tributaries to Crabtree Creek with box culverts that are buried 1' deep. After the terminus of the sanitary sewer
access drive, the trail will continue as an asphalt greenway section along the existing sanitary sewer easement until it meets the existing asphalt greenway (approximately 700').
The project area along the existing sanitary sewer easement will be fine graded and a new greenway trail with a typical section of 2" S9.513 surface course on 6" ABC stone will be
provided (top of pavement will match existing grades). The type of equipment will likely be conventional construction equipment (backhoes and trucks with some mini excavators) for this
project. Construction entrances will be established before work begins to prevent transport of sediment from vehicle activity. Mats will be placed within the construction area to allow
vehicle access during wet soil conditions and to reduce the disturbance to established vegetation. Silt fencing Will be installed at the top of the banks within the project area prior to land
disturbing activities to prevent sedimentation into the tributaries. Silt fencing will be removed after the area has been stabilized. There will be minimal removal of trees, as the path
follows an existing sanitary sewer easement however there will grading and ground stabilization.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Ex conditions and greenway layout.pdf 5.11 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
Comments:
r No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-00138
5c. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Brett Feulner
Agency/Consultant Company: Dewberry Engineers
Other:
r Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
PJD was sent to USACE on January 8, 2020 and a site visit was performed with USACE and Dewberry on February 25, 2020.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
CrabtreeCreekPackage.pdf 15.36MB

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
P Buffers
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type*(?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* �2f.Typeof 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
U
1
Greenway Trail
P
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland
No
Corps
0.022
(acres)
Grading
T
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Wetland
Corps
0.044
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.044
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.066
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.022
2h. Comments:
The disturbed area on each side of the 10' greenway trail will be re -vegetated within the sanitary sewer easement.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3h. Impact
F
(?)
]3g.S.width*
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Greenway Crossing 1
Permanent
Culvert
F
Intermittent
DWR
14
20
Average (feet)
(lir�rfee[)
S2
Greenway2
Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
SB
Intermittent
DWR
12
20
Average (feet)
(linearfeel)
S3
Greenway Crossing
Permanent
-]
Rip Rap Fill
�SA
Intermittent
DWR
14
30
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeel)
S4
Greenway Crossing
Y 9
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
P P
SB
Intermittent
DWR
12
30
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
100
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
100
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
The greenway vdll cross two tributaries within the existing sanitary sewer easement. Concrete box culverts with riprap will be installed (buried 1'). The
box culverts will allow flow and require less maintenance for the greenway.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
V Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r- Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
C Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact

Allowable
T
Tributary to Crabtree Creek
No
7,235
3,294
Allowable
P
Tributary to Crabtree Creek
No
2,454
3,136
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 7,235.00 3,294.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 2,454.00 3,136.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 9,689.00 6,430.00
6i. Comments:
This project is utilizing the existing sanitary sewer easement to relocate the ebsting Crabtree Creek out of the existing floodway. The existing greenway
is presently closed and has been closed multiple times in this area due to the ebsting greenway collapsing and failing. The greenway has been
repaired twice and has now failed in a third location. Due to the safety of the public and minimizing impacts to the area, we are utilizing an ebsting
easement that is cleared and maintained. The grades match closely to ebsting grades. All areas that are disturbed will be stabilized with riparian
seeding.
Supporting Documentation
Buffer Impacts exhibit.pdf 1.57MB
Stream Impacts.pdf 4.25MB
Wetland area exhibit.pdf 1.61 MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation v
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Utilizing ebsting easements and areas that are cleared and maintained will minimize impacts. The improvements Will include bank and slope
stabilization. All other area will be re -vegetated for natural stabilization and regrowth. The flatter tie in grades along the existing sanitary sewer
easement should minimize erosion upon revegetation.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Coffer dams/impervious dikes will be used during culvert construction with pump arounds to ensure all work occurs in the dry. Silt fence will be
provided along the tributary side of the construction. After construction is complete the area will be covered with matting, seeded, and mulched. The
riparian buffer area will be re -seeded with native plant species. The limits of construction will constrain the width along either side of the ebsting
greenway to minimize impact.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The impact to the tributary is less than 100 LF and the impact to the wetland is 0.066 acres.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHUNT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
9 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*

r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The proposed 10' greenway trail alignment runs parallel with the buffer in an existing 40' sanitary sewer easement that is maintained by the City of Raleigh. The proposed greenway trail
will match existing grades. The increase in impervious surface is 0.4%. There will be no concentrated flow. Stormvater will sheet flow across the trail at a 2 % slope onto a vegetated
shoulder.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
This greeenway project is completely City of Raleigh funded. The project is to replace a section of the existing greenway that has failed multiple times
and will help with public safety and future maintenance.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a realignment of an existing greenway trail to move the trail out of the floodway. The trail is being places in existing sanitary sewer easement
and existing right of way. No additional development is allowed in these areas.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
https://gisl3.services.ncdot.gov/esnV
NC Natural Heritage Program
Consultation Documentation Upload

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes f• No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://gisl3.services.ncdot.gov/esryV
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
https://gis13.services.ncdot.gov/esm/ & https:Hmaps.raleighnc.gov/imaps/index.html#
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Through hydraulic study, no -impact analysis was prepared.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
DFIRM_NC_3720171500J
Miscellaneous
Comments
Surveys for Michauxis sumac were conducted on October 17, 2019 and no specimens were found.
The closest occurrence to the proposed project of the Dwarf Wedgemussel occurred in 1951 in the Neuse River (historic record), which is approximately 12.5 stream miles from the
project site, and the closest occurrence of the Atlantic Pigtoe occurred in 2003 in Crabtree Creek, which is approximately 3 stream miles up from the project site (NCNHP). Surveys were
conducted in Crabtree Creek at Capital Boulevard 100 meters upstream and 400 meters downstream in October 2016 for the NCDOT and twenty-five live Eastern Elliptic were
documented. The Asian Clam was observed. An individual of one snail species (Elimia catenaria) was observed.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
u
Signature u
fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Pamela Kistner
Signature
04
Date
3/27/2020

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. NA PLAN NO. NA PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: Sewer Easement -Ratchford Road Raleigh, NC
Please print:
Property Owner: Cif of Raleigh
Property Owner: c/o David Bender
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Brett Feulner , of Dewberry Engineers
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above): _David Bender for the City of
Raleigh
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: 1 8 ^ --J�c� Date:

M
M

a
715760
35o 48' 56" N
g
35o 48' 40" N
715820 715980 715940 716000
Map Scale: 1:2,350 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
N 0 30 60 120 180
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map —Wake County, North Carolina
(Structure 106 Realignment)
715820 715980 715940 716000
716060
716060
716120
35o 48' 56" N
35o 48' 40" N
716120
3/7/2019
Pagel of 3

Z
O
G
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
0
Z
/W
V
W
J
a
O O
U) U)
7
U O 0-0
U O O
E
O)
� U m m
Q O N
U O C E C
U) E m y Zi
y O O O
O C y
a) . Q
m m O- O a)
U m = a)
= u) E V) _a
> L O O a)
C >
Q O
a) -0
-O U) 6
> Q � m U
m y E
CL E m o a) m
m
m E N
O C m N y
U a) N E rn
C
rn E a) M'
m y
E m3U2a)
y a) o m
wE Uu)
O a)
m
>
Uy U)
O
N
(nCL
C
U
0 L
O
m
�_
y 7 0
-
�_ O
m
E
.N E
U)
-
U)
O
N
E
Y)
U
��
Q
m
g u)
°) a)) a
m m
U
E
N
Q
vim) -0 O
a)
N
co
a)1
N
a) C7
O Q N
Z
m O
N
V E N 'O
Q
U
d
'6 O
7 m
Q'
U N
O
O>
a)
E
U w
m m 0
U
o
m
3 N `° a)
Q� m
O
Z
a)
Q
m
C y
OwQ
m
a)
U
2
o
`) m C U
mU OU
a)
U
m
c
`°�QE
0
3
U a)
> N
a) o U
"o
O
E
��
O
E m a)
O
'� a) m
O
O
Q
N m E a)
m2
U a) a) E y
Q
w '6
_0
U O
N
m 0 N m
U
U)
N a)
_ a) .O
a).y
a)
3 J
m
(OA O' C
U)y
Q') �
n
i
N
t C 0
N
a)
Z E
U U ai m o
a)
aaci a)
m
m
a)
rn
o O
a) a)
rn (u
-O
m
m rn
E
O _0 T
C y
Q a) j,
a) m m 7
mn
C
N Q
U) (6
O '6 m 0-
O a)
T
g U
Q m
..
m
s n E
E
`) `)
U a)
C
N
E m U
D O U N
w
o
a)
m
o m
(OA U)
O
iU-6
D
u) U
E>
Qa)
7 >+
U a)
m 0
EO
V
y
O
O)
O.Qa) C
._
m m
� O
Q .� a) 3
U
y
—
— O
P
N
m
a) O
E m s
FL E
U U
2 U_ -6 Q m
H o
U U
U—
0 co
H U . 9 -15--)
y
�
y
Q
4
(i
O
U
R
L
r
Q
Q
>.
O
a)
R
2
y
O
a
-yo
O
L
a)
Q U)
>
CL
Z U)
°
J
m
E
a)
m
y
0
m
O
O
a
o O
U) cn
N
>
L_
O
cn
y 0
cn
�
o
a)
U
J
a Q
*
R
a
R
�
C
�
R 4
R5
F
R
m
y
C
O
y
0
.�
O
Q
U)
a°
a°
N
c
R
N
a
Q
a
O`
U
0
a o
C C
> >
Q Q
R R
C
>
Q
R
a)
R
y
C)
fl Q
3
Q
o
-a
w
fl
Q
>,
=
3
3 y
O `O
F
R
o
O
o
>
>
N
°
w
O
o
(�
0
(�
w
,
o
Q
_ o
a) O-
o `o
co
—
3
O T
w
>
>
a
R a
o
coi
o
Y o a
y
Q
o 0
cn cn
0
cn
p
o
m
o R
m U
O
U
(7
(7
m
J
'm R
J
y
N
a
O
m
m
U)
R
U)
o
U)
a o
in U) U)
w
a
R
yp�pyp��
`¢
`
11F
U)
Q
y
U)
� U
� a)
U '
= m
O
U Q
Q O
U
0
m
Z

Soil Map —Wake County, North Carolina
Structure 106 Realignment
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ChA
Chewacla and Wehadkee
soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
0.1
3.1 %
Ur
Urban land
1.7
54.6%
W
Water
0.2
7.3%
WaE
Wake-Rolesville complex, 15
to 25 percent slopes, very
rocky
1.1
35.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
3.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/7/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

,LNHPM, avaaQ N
sHaanoSHH Tv CUTIa L
y6ia�ca N
QNV NOIJIVHHJHU 'SHUvd NVIci SNOIIIGN03 ONIISIX3 s z Q
/�� n.oe iin�+re arm XXXXXX-XXXXXXXX-XX-XXX W o
// \ reailns (n O U it
10
®AzzegmeCl s1NIwIAO�II i goy i�nlon�ls _ o
cn
o of
G
1 3
v
fir`+�A�
;r I �
I
�� ti P 11 II
M y _ 0
I
I 1
�N44a=
0o
\
T I
4P
I\
¢]W
3 way
P
3
C
o-Z
4 f o
J +
w
T TT
O T
Zz, \3nva�
ro
h X Y ZtiV i tl22 6,
R e2 0 Nr0
J
JNOPV
•lwk/v e..
2
6f ��O / Pfp, W80[�ED
T6LZ'___ 2
s22
10,oa8 s dSb '_
L-"
go
.�a�i
rill i1-661---- -- - / q �Q �i '�- " "'
0
6601 /+I nN,—
3NOZ
�%S=eS- I 3 o d y VA
t6,-,"dg
is
v -- 11 I 1
06�'
dam �z"
11
�T 21
OOZ /1N1
- Et\-y1313 ( tea [02-
` £ do tim`O �o /MW N Q �0*I�N ____
i
w
�ry
o [�i 63 NO
W Y ram. �PiZ 0
Tjdol
l
/ o
cogs
\ 1 1

,LNavuaVdaa
SHJanoSaa Tv CUTIa y610108
QNV NOIJIVHHJHa 'SHaVd
/�
//CD
�e unu we gins
N
N
s
Z Q
_ o
W
U II
N
NV,i SNOIIIGNOJ JNIISIX3
XXXXXX—XXXXXXXX—XX—XXX
\
H`DMVH AO LLD / %
®Axxi4i"d
s1NIwIAO�Ic i goy i�inlon�ils
ILo
WHR
w.
0 1 --60�,
1
j 3 V I
f
zo
I i i
1'i I —OZa,
T
I 1 II
\
III
N No
u
III Y i'z%it
02

,LNHPM, avaaQ N
sHaanoSHH Tv CUTIa L
QNV NOIJ,VHHJHU 'SHUvd �e NVIci SNOIIIGNOJ ONIISIX3 s Z Q W
/�� n.oe iin�+re arm XXXXXX—XXXXXXXX—XX—XXX
// \ unu we mns o U C o
®AzzegmeCl s1NIwInoddN goy idnlondls
LU
Ch
ki
0 o of
- •- _ :,N W
vV C o
R
�e \
`boo A
la of ee
F I
Y I ''A
I \ m =O
op� i I Imo ry
O 2P I
\ I CC "tea
Z
_ �oal si I i
q r /
o I�
II� I
l 7r�ia3u
i

,LNaM,LavdaQ
saaanosaa Ivanc7na Ll OlDd
N
N
NV I,J �NZi1NNX NOISOZi3 � �OVNIVLIO .ii�la�i2i `.i
0NV NOIJ,VaaOaa 'Saavd
//
�e
L
i
[zn o
WU
it
-XXXXXXXX-XX-XXX/XXXXXX
ILomva a0 LLD
®Axxi4i"d
s1NIwIAO�I I i goy i�inlon�ils
z _
W=
odw N 6
cn
= oa
NR
z
z
I
o i
1
�%.
10
I
/
ND
oWN
W v�
1 w Q I
f 3
�\ e
1 ONKry 8 P\ o o 5'o z
q
I I
WO
-/`-
- -I _
0[2"
-Z0`v
ro
�o^
�
II�v
3NOZ\
�'8S-cam %l00
rr
I ' ��
ly
rM;l'� �� //
0200"
vrOyWry d01 paHV N
961�d01
/ o
z
��=ao,J

,LNaM,LaVdaQ
saaanosaa 2Vanc7na Ll OlDd
ONV NOIIVaaOaa 'Smuvd
/��
//
�e
�re3i,ns
n.oe iin�+ream
N
N
"
Ln
O
Vl O
W oCD
li
N
NVF ,i �OZJIXOX NOISOZi3 � �OVNIVLIO
�`.i
XXXXXX—XXXXXXXX—XX—XXX
\
H'DMVa d0 LLD / %
®Axxi4i"d
�
U
O
SiNIMI00000i goy
oonoon000
z
_
W=
odw N
6
oa
cn
`:
NR
- -
vl
-
--� T k I
el'�77
N
2F II I
II mT I �l o _
o.
a Io
z
o,
�r I
�
al
,
&o
,I
I I
II I
I I
qI
�I
� ti II II vl \
Dob vl I r�
I
I
I
17
'
0I
I SE o
I�
I
I
"
o� �a� �v I
g N
- - -
"*Wsv10
\
old a
N

i Niav ,Lumaa N
saaanosax 2axnL7na y6101DU N Ln
ONV NOIJ,VHHDHU 'Smuvd NV,i �OZJI OJ NOISOZi3 �P �OVNIVLIa
/XXXXXX—XXXXXXXX—XX—XXXCD
//
/ILJCva AO LLD
®AzzegmeCl s1NIwInoddN goy idnlondls
z _ a W
odw N cn
oaN a �..............
w
Es-
.• _ y:s w
y I .aa ���o - e
\

IN3N.LaVdaa
saoanosaa deanda j g6ioloa
N
N
w
NY1d 1nO�:b'1 3115
aNa NOLLVaaOaa `saaea
a,� gee o ro s
�d
Q
a
o o
w
XXXXXX-XXXXXXXX-XX-XXX
00
2
(n
o
U iio
S
i N I w In o�] d w i g o � i�i n
l o n�i l s
uoLadea do a,L[O
'
`� -�
cn
u
cn
cc
all
LU
OZ
A Al
WZO
iva iy:-o� fal
2.
moo-
a��
[
a z
R
�
If
[I
m q
a[
I �
N
li
[
�pN�PN4 9��NNo
_ C
N N N N
m
�,.
E E E E,l In,
I �
8 � .
JNOW
Y
� � B N�N o3ogOM
.. a .
P
—� Bites
f
Pe
r�
g` dS
�S61\
8956,
v
m
/
660L
�
'4
d s-eau
�
m /Il O
z
.,3V. 3NOZ
%7F'� ��, 5 vs
f
_
C
i 3 �
m m
z
-t S60�y,j3 309p✓� \��� ,�AoiVy'1- � �4�
00 ,,,/ 111 L6
,H m O�O,�aN .L''N d01
/VN f '96t
�$�
0
h
� 02 .dNfl
30dEl oM

` %000 Figure - Aerial Imagery
�00 City of Raleigh
%
Crabtree CreekTrail Relocation
Raleigh Stream Impacts
' Feet
0 200 400
20 LF of 2-7' X 5' Box
culvert buried 1' - S2
20 LF of 2- 7' X 5' Box
.k Culvert buried 1' - S1
30 LF of Riprap
Outlet Protection - S4
30 FL of Riprap
Outlet protection - S3
�t r
j s j
Legend
P^ Study Area
Permanent
0 Stream Impact
Aj Potential Wetland
Waters of the US
y^
Potential Non-
`` Wetland Waters of
the US(Stream)