NC0005258_PERMIT MODIFICATION_19931119

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNIM& COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0005258
SGL Carbon
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
"Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
Report
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
November 19, 1993
This dacum4exwt is pr�Urnted on rexase paper -- ignax-e ftwy
coxate3Mt oxx the re-%rersoe side

Y r
•"State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Jerry Miller
Sigri Great Lakes Carbon Corporation
PO Box 40
Morganton, NC 28655
Dear Mr. Miller:
•1 � T��
November '19, 1993.,;_
NOV 2 2 '159.3
Permit Modification
S igri=Great-Lakes-Carbon-Corporation
Removal of -Nickel, Toluene -and -Chromium
�Monitor.ing_from-NPD ES--Permit-NC0005258
Burke County
In accordance with your request received April 26, 1993, we are forwarding herewith
the subject effluent sheet. The requested changes in this permit are in the removal of Nickel,
Toluene, and Chromium monitoring from the effluent page. This permit is issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
December 6, 1983.
You also requested that Part II, Section C, Operation and Operation Maintenance of
P011Lltion .Controls Item 1, Certified Operator, be removed from the permit. The condition is
standard language for all NPDES permits and shall remain in the permit. Please note that
employment of a certified operator is contingent upon classification of the facility by the
Certification Commission. Since the Commission has declassified this facility, as documented in
the letter dated April 7, 1993, you provided, employment of a certified operator is not required
at this time. However, in the future should the Commission reconsider the declassification, a
certified operator may be required. Should the facility be classified, you will receive notice and
ample time to train or employ a certified operator.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this
permit modification are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be
`in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final
and binding.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Aclion Employer 50% recycled/ 10% pest -consumer paper

Mr. Jerry Miller
November 19, 1993
Page Two
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental
permit that may be required. .
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Charles Alvarez at
telephone number 919/733-5083.
Si rely,
Preston H ®rr., P.E.
cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
Washington Regional Office
Compliance
Central Files
Teoht-eh--Br.anch
Kim Brantley
0

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NCO005258
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below:
Effluent Charact9ristics
Discharge Limitations
Monitoring_ Requirements
.
Lhs/day Units (specify)
Measurement
Sample .
'Sample
Mon. Avg. Daily Max Mon. Avg. Daily. Max.
Erequensy
Type
Location .
Flow
Daily
Instantaneous
E
TSS
30.0 mg/1 45.0 mg/1
2/Month
Composite
E
Oil and Grease
10.0 mg/I 15.0 mg/I
2/Month
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E,U,D
Copper
Monthly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity—
Quarterly
Composite
E
Pollutant Analysis""""
Annually
Composite
E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, U - Upstream 100 feet, D - Downstream 300 feet
** The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving stream of more than 2.8°C and in
no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 29°C.
*** Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 17 %; March, June, September, and December - See Part III, Condition D.
**** Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Condition, See Part 1Il, Condition F.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab
sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 27, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Alvarez
THRU: Ruth Swanek IVC5
Carla Sander-sor
FROM Jackie Nowell
SUBJECT: Permit Modification for Sigri Great Lakes Carbon Corp.
NPDES Permit No. NCO005258
Burke County
The Rapid Assessment Group has evaluated the subject facility's request for the
deletion of permit limitations and monitoring requirements for nickel, chromium, and
toluene. The limits were assigned to the facility in 1990 based on data provided in the 1990
priority pollutant analysis. The staff report from the Mooresville Regional Office indicated
that at that time, "the wastewater was generated by several processes, each utilizing contact
cooling water". The Asheville Regional Office has conducted the most recent plant
inspection and has determined that while there are very small amounts of contact cooling
water present, the majority of the wastewater is non contact.
Compliance monitoring data for the past two years indicates that the average
concentration of chromium and toluene in the effluent is < I µg/l. Nickel concentrations
have been reported in 8 of the past 24 months, however the values are much lower than the
allowable concentration of 513 µg/l.
Results of Great Lakes' chronic toxicity test indicate that the facility has passed all
tests since June 19.91. Because of the small amounts of nickel, toluene, and chromium that
have been discharged for the past two years and no problems with toxicity, we recommend
that the limits and monitoring requirements be deleted from the NPDES permit,
If there are questions, please contact me.
cc: Forrest Westall
[WL ..File

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality
Permits and Engineering Unit
July 28, 1993
To: Jackie Nowell, Modeler Extraordinaire
Through: Carla Sanderson, Supervisor, Rapid Assessment Group
From: Charles Alvarez, Environmental Engineer, NPDES Permits
Subject: Sigri Great Lakes Carbon, formerly Great Lakes Carbon,
NC0005258, Burke County, Silver Creek, 03-08-31
Sigri Great Lakes Carbon wishes to modify their permit and drop
nickel, toluene and chromium requirements. I am including the
request letter, 2 years of compliance data and the effluent page.
Please comment as to whether the request is appropriate.
If you need any more information please call me at 733-5083 ext
553.
Luau qisj W-'s u5'r Ky
U� 6 U�' I f�' CA 9C)�'I

SiEri Great Lake: Carbon Corporarion
Cov
CARBON
Sigri Great Lakes Carbon Corporation
Morganton
P.O. Box 40
Jamestown Road
%for,anwn, Noah Carolina 25693
Phone [phone]"1
Fax [phone]C
April 26, 1993
Mr. Paul Muller
N.C. Dept. of Environmental Management
Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, N.C. 28801
Permit Revision =
NPDES Permit No. 0005258
Sigr-i:Great Lakes -Carbon Corporation
Morganton, Burke'County, North Carolina
C7
Dear Mr. Muller:
We request that monitoring requirements for (1) Nickel,
(2) Chromium, and (3) Toluene listed under Section A, Effluent
Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Final, of the above
mentioned permit be removed. As can be seen on the following
summary reflecting analytical results for a twenty-three month
period, discharge quantities have been well below specifZed
limitations. We do not anticipate any process changes that would
cause an increase in the quantity of these materials.
Also, item no. 1 under Section C, Operation and fva`5o
Operation Maintenance of Pollution Controls (p # 9), needs to be
removed from the above mentioned permit. (See attached letter
from Cindy Finan dated April 7, 1993).
AJM/na
yerely,
y filler
APR, 2--3 19; P,
�uf,I_11rs
�SHENIILL_ OFF i S

.y
Discharge Water
`ii
Date.
TSS
Grs
Ni
Cr
Cu
Tol
Hay 91
3
------------------------------------
<
10
<10
To
<
10
<
10
Juice 51
13
3
<
10
<10
<10
<
10
'
3
<
10
July 91
13
3
<
10
<10
<10
<
10
< 1
3
10
Aug 91
2
8
<
10
<10
9
<
10
1
2
<
10
wept 91
< 1
1
10
<10
1='
<
L0
1
<
1
<
10
Oct 91
i5
2
<
10
<10
15
<
10
1
<1
<
10
NOV `31
1
<
1
<
10
<10
14
<
io
1
1
E
10
Dec 91
5
3
<
10
<10
54
<
10
5
1
<
10
Jan 92
1
31
<
10
<10
14
<
10
< 1
b
10
et "92
1
<
1
<
10
<10
18
<
10
5
<
1
<
10
March 92
12
1
<
10
<10
52
<
10
< 1
1
<
.10
April 92
9
<
1
<
10
<10
1g
<
10
43
1
<
10
Hay 92
12
<
1
<
10
<10
40
<
10
4
4
<
10
June 92
< 1
1
<
10
<10
4
<
10
?
3
<
10
July 92
2
2
10
10
44
<
10
2
12
<
10
Aug 92
< 1
<
1
<
10
<10
8
<
10
< 1
2
<
10
Sept 92
< 1
<
1
<
10
<10
10
<
10
< 1
3
<
10
Oct 92
2
4
<
10
<10
80
<
10
< 1
2
<
10
Nov 92
4
<
1
10
<10
4
<
10
< 1
1
<
10
Dec 92
< 1
<
1
<
10
<10
8
<
10
4
<
1
<
10
Jan 93
< 1
<
1
<
10
<10
10
<
10
14
<
1
<
10
Feb 93
3
5
<
10
<10
11
<
10
< 1
8
<
10
afar 93
< 1
1
<
10
<10
4
<
10
2
<
1
10

<,TA r�
Original to: Engineering Department Fi
Copy to: A. i. Miller, Engineering
J. R. Poteet., Plant manag'
tr O1
State or Noah Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street " Raleigh, north Carolina 27604
April 7, 1993
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Mr. Doug Evans, Punt Engineer
Great Lakes Carbon
PO Box 40
Morganton, NC 28655
Jonathan B. Howes; Secreiar
Sub-iect: Classification of Great Lakes Carhon
Wastewater Treatment Facility in Burke County
Permit No, NTC0005258
Dear Mr. Evans:
On July 1, 1971, you were advised that subject treatment facility w
was a class I facility. However, a careful review by the staff of the
Mooresville Regional.Office reveals that subject facility should be �•
declassified. Our records now reflect this correction.
If you have questions or if we can assist you in any other matter,
please do not hesitate to let us know.
E5
Sincerely r_ yous , ..
�Q t?�
Cindy Finan, Supervisor
Trai n{ ncr and Certification -Unit
F3/jp
cc: Yooresville Regional Office
attachments
-ux !�1687, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Equal Oppoi-wnity Ailirma!ive Ac!ion Ernp#oyer

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr„ P.E., Director
WATER QUALITY SECTION
.August 4, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Alvarez
NPDES Permits Group
THROUGH: Forrest'R. Westall-
Water Quality RegiA,Jpervisor
FROM: James R. Reid
Envy. ronment .. gi ee.r.
SUBJECT: Sigri Great Lakes Carbon
Modification
NPDES Pert_i_i-t Number NC0005258
Burke County
Regional staff recommend modification of: subject permit
in accordance with the applicant's request. The
discharge is composed entirely of "on -contact cooling
waters. Nickel, toluene, or chromium would not be
expected to be present in concentrations sufficient to
cause problems in the receiving stream. Data substantiate
expectations; Sigri Great Lakes Carbon's self -monitoring
and DEM's inspection data reveal concentrations of those
constituents (Ni, toluene, and Cr_) to be lower than
quality standards for surface waters.
Monitoring requirements and limitations for nickel,
toluene, and chromium may be removed from NPDES Permit
Number NC0005258. Please contact me if additional
information is needed.
[�7
1
result'9
..3 - -
__:
._J
Intcrclianctc BuddinR, 59 Wood(in Place, Asheville, NC. 2RRul relcphone t-�SIf,208
An Erwal Opr�)rnwity Affirmati`'c Ac{iori Frn�l rycr

14"1
, A,
Al
41-
AGIII
L-oom

Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
1. Facility Information:
NPDES Permit No: 0005258 Discharge (Pipe) No: 001
Facility Name: Sigri Great Lakes Carbon: Class:-
-I -Persons) Collecting Samples- + J . R : Johnson
County:
Year: _
Burke
1992
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: X Yes No
if no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: Blue :Ridge Labs
Page 1 of 9
II. Sampling: f-
24'hr composite for main sample 1 grab sample for purgeable fraction
y
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Sampling begun (date, time):_ 9 = 00 A.M. 11-30-92 X Yes
Sampling finished (date, time):9 : 00 A.M. 12-1-92 No
Date and time'sampled (grab sample): 9:00 A.M. 12-1-92
Instructions
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided %the form.
rrt
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quantified uniJer the 10
significant -peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods?aln be�ubstituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distributato th aboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.--
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annukl,3olluta�t Analysis
Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GCIMS library search. Tentative identification is all that is required; conficroationfry standard
injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention timEg
r—
Reporting r
6 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 - If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or' < ') the quantitation limit
in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quan-
titation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
in units of micrograms per liter (ug11) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, identification basis, -and
MS scan number for,each. in addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GCIMS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box Raleigh, NC 2-;t6A - Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports. A9531�

organic Analytical Information: NOTE
yi
See attached lab report for
OQeratinq Conditions, etc.
Page 9 of 9
organic Fraction
Method
Extraction
GC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes)
Batch
Continuous
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
Compound
Recovery
%
Purgeable
624
X
BFB
90
Toluene - d8
80
1 2-DCE-d4
120
Acid Extractable
625
X
Phenol - d6
81
Tribromo henol
118
Fluoro henol
108
Base/Neutral Extractable
625
X
Fluorobiphenyl
106
Nitrobenzene - d5
84
Terphenyl - dl4
90
Example: Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, DB-5,
He, 30 cm/sec, 40°C (4 min) -
270°C, 100/min
d5 • phenol
50
GUMS Library size (number of reference spectra): 42,222 I
C \A-4. 1oral rlfl— r`k—i—lo
212-2136D
212-2136E
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected in Sample 212-2136F
Fraction STORET Number 78240 212-2136G
STORET Compound
Number
Ouantitation
Limit Target
Duantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
01104
Aluminum
50
60
01097
Antimony
50
60 '�
01002
Arsenic
10
1
Less than
01012
Beryllium
25
10
Less than
01027
Cadmium
2
1
1
01034
Chromium
5
Less than
01042
Copper
2
1
24
01051
L�Bd
10
2 G
71900
Mercury
0.2
Less than
01067
Nickel
10
Less than
01147
Selenium
5
Less than
01077
Silver
5
Less than
01092
Zinc
10
?
10
7 llihnr innrnonirc• i
01007
Barium
500
100
Less than
00940
Chloride
1000
5000
00720
Cyanide
20
5
6
00951
Fluoride
100
100
1000
* If different from quantitation limit target
Analytical Laboratory Representative:_
Signed: Lab report attached
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): D.R. Evans
I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed: �^ - _ »✓_� — — —
Date:
Date:

Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Repotting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
Page 1 of 9
Facility Information:
NPDES Permit No: 0005258 Discharge (Pipe) No: 001 Year: 199 -
Facili#y Name:.
Great Lakes Carbon Class: T County: Burke
Person(s) Collecting Samples: J.R. Johnson
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: X Yes No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory:
Blue Rid e Labs - 3 Ir
II. Sampling:
Nov 101991
24 hr composite for main sample I grab 4ample for purgeable fraction CiEHjRAL FILE COPY
Date Sampled: (composite sample?? ► Corresponding sample taken
for toxicity testing:
Sampling begun (date, time):-10 A.M. 9-16-91
Sampling finished (date, time):10 A.M. 9-17-91 No
Date and time sampled (grab sample):10 A.M.- -
91
Instructions
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form.
Analysis
4 Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the W
significant peaks rule, using appropriate listed
oproved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (OEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GClMS library search. Tentative identification is all that is required; confirmation by standard
injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 - If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or'� the quantitation limit
in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quan-
titation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
in units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, identification basis, and
MS scan number for each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GCIMS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.

L
A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 1
Fraction STORET Number 84085
624
Page 2 of )
STORET Compound
Number
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
34210 Acrolein
Ouantitation
Limit Target
(ug/1)
100
Quantitation
Limit'
(ug/1)
Concentration
Detected
(ug/1)
less than
GClMS
Confirmation?
Yes No
34215
34030
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
100
5
less
less
Tss
than
than
32101
Bromodichloromethane
5
7 e
than
32104
Bromoform
5
less
than
34413
32102
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
10
5
less
less
than
than
34301
Chlorobenzene
6
less
­ss
than
34311
34576
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
10
10
e
less
than
than
32106
Chloroform
5
13
X
34418
Chloromethane
10
less
than
32105
34496
34531
34501
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
5
5
5
5
less
less
less
less
than
than
than
than
34546
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
5
less
than
34541
1,2-Dichloropropane
6
less
than
34704
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
5
less
than
34699
34371
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
5
8
less
less
than
34423
Methylene chloride
5
less
haja
34516
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
7
less
than
34475-
Tetrachloroethylene
5
less
than
34010
Toluene
6
less
than
34506
1,1,1-Trichioroethane
5
less
than
34511
1,1,2-Trichioroethane
5
less
than
39180
Trichloroethylene
5
less
than
34488
Trichlorofluromethane
10
less
than
39175
Vinyl chloride
10
less
than
If different from quantitation limit target
K LZ;
Nov 101991
CENTRAL FILE COPY

1-1,.Aga�al Information:
Fraction I Method
,,c
Purgaable
Acid Extractable
BaseiNeutrai Extractable
Example: Acid Extractable
624
Page 9 of 9
Extraction GC Operating Conditions Surrogates (Spikes)
Column Description
Batch Continuous Length X ID, Film Thickness, Compound Recovery
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
x 1.2-Dichloroethane- 4
Bromofluorobenzene 88.3
625 X Phenol - d6 70
2 4 6 - Tribromoohe of 68
12 - Fluoro henol 1 68
625 X Nitrobenzene - d5 72
2 - FluorobilDhen 1 1 2
Terphenvl - d14
625 X 30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, DB•5, I d5 • phenol 50
He, 30 cm/sec, 40°C (4 min)
270°C, 104/min
GCIMS Library size (number of reference spectra):
109-0784A
109-0784B
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
detected
in Sample109-0784C
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals
(as listed below)
Fraction STOREY Number 78240
STORET Compound
Quantitation
Quanti
Concentration
Number
Limit Target
'
Limit*
Detected
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
01104 ArurninurrWi
50
10
40
01097 Antimony
50
100'^*
less than
01002 Arsenic
10
01012-- Beryllium
25
01027 Cadmium
2
ban
01034 Chromium
5
8 ;
01042 Co r --v
2
r
lllJJl
less than
01051 Lead
10
71900 Me rcu
0.2
0 . 7
01067 Nickel
10
-
less than
01147 Selenium
5
a.
1
01077 Silver
5
le5s than
01092 Zinc
10
less than
2. Other inor anics: Sample 109-0784B-CN
Sample 109:�0784C-C1
& F
01007 Barium
500
100
less than
00940 Chloride 1000 4000
00720 Cyanide 20 5 12
00951 Fluoride 100 less than
' If different from quantitation limit target ** See lab explanation - Attached
Analytical Laboratory Representative:
Signed: Lab reiport attached Date:
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): D.R. Evans
I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed:

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING Of SELF -MONITORING SUMMARY] Mon, Aug 16. 1993
rArrr rry arnvra r. A. cwr•r
GOLDSFIORO WW11' PERM CIIR LIMA% w EXP 6%
80 PASS
--
•»
PASS
PASS
•—
bt
--
PASS
PASS
NLOO23949 Dcgin:01/01/91 Frequency: Q 11/1' A JAN APR JUL OCI'
NonComp:
90 PASS
—
--
PASS
--
—
PASS
•—
—
PASS
—
—
County: WAYNF. Region: WARO Subbasin: NEU05
91 PASS
—
—
NR
—
—
Na
—
PASSSIG
PASS
NR
M
1111:6.735 special
02 PASS
---
--
Ni
—
--
PASS
—
—
PASS
--
—
7Q10:271.1 IWQ%):3.79 Order
93 NR
—
--
PASS
—
—
GRAHAM WWII) PERM CUR LIM: 14%(till 8/1/93 CIIR
LIM 14%)
89 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
---
FAIL
Ni
Ni
PASS
NCO021211 Degin:06/20/89 Froquency: Q P/P A MAR JUN SEP DEC
NonComp:
90 —
—
FAIL
PASS
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
County:ALAMANCE . Region: WSRO Subbasin: CPF02
91 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
PF: 3.50 Special
02 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
FAIL
, PASS
—
PASS
7Q10:0.070 lWC(%):98.72 Order.
93 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
GRANITE FALLS WWTP PERM CHR LIM:I I%
89 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
FAIL
NCO021890 Begin:.03/01/89 Frequency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC
NonComp:
90 —
PASS
PASS
—
—
PASS
PH
NR
PASS
NR
-«
PASS
County:CALDWF.LL Region:ARO Subbasin:CM32
91 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
PP:0.75 Special
92 —
—
PASS
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
7Q10:9.3 IWC(%):ILI1 Order:
93 —
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
GREAT LAKES CARDCWtORPORATION PERM CHR LIM:17%
s9 —
—
.—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
NC0005258 Begin:03/12/92 Frequency: Q P/F A MAR JUN SEP DEC
No((Comp:
90 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cotmty:BURKE Reg)an;ARO Subbasin_:C 031
-
91 —
—
—
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
PF:2.729 Special
92 —
—
PASS
—
—
M
P/l9S
—
�A53
—
PASS
7QI0:20,.9 IWC(%):17 Order:
93 —
—
PABS
—
—
S J.G
GREENSBORO N BUFFALO CRK W WI'P . PERM CHR LIM:96%
89 PASS
—
—
FAIL
—
—
bt
PASS
—
FAIL
—
—
NC0024325 Begin:12J01/88 Frequency: Q P/F JAN APR JUL OCT
NonComp:
90 PASS
—
PASS
—
—
Ni
—
PASS
PASS
—
—
County:GUILPORD Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02
91 PASS
—
—
FAIL
—
—
FAIL
PASS
PASS
PASS
—
—
1'h: 16.0 Sperial SOCA0/28/91-7/.11/94 CIIR Q 1'H1 LIM 96%
02 PASS
---
...
PASS
--
••.
FAIL
FAIL
PASS(s)
PENDiNG(s) —
—
7QI0:0.90 1WC(%):96.50 Order:
93 FAIL
—
—
PASS
--
—
GREENSBOROOSBORNE WWPP PERM CHR LIM:94%
V 69 LATE
FAIL
—
PASS
—
—
bt
PASS
—
PASS
—
—
NC0047194 Begin:I 110 1/9 1 Prtlur•n y: Q 11/1' A JAN APR JUL OCT
NonComp:
90 PASS
—
---
PASS
—
—
LATE
—
PASS
PASS
—
—
County: 0UIL11ORD Region: WSRO Subbasint 011102
91 PASS
•..
---
PASS
»
--
PASS
«•
—
FAIL
—
—
PF: 20.0 Special
92 PASS
--
•—
FAIL
PASS
—
PASS
--
—•
PASS(e)
.»
—
7QI0:2.30 1WC(1x,):93.0H Order.
93 FAIL
PASS
—
PASS
—
—
6RV.FNVIIJ1iWWII1 PERM CIIR I1IM!1.0%
y n0 --
•••
PASS
---
•--
PASS
••.
...
PASS
...
•••
PASS
NCO023931 Dcgin:02/01/88 Fnxpuncy: Q P/F MAR JUN SEP DEC
NonComp:
90 --
--
PASS
--
PASS
---
—
PASS(s)
--
—
PASS(s)
county:Pfrr Region: WARD Subhasm: TAR05
91 --
--
PASS(s)
--
—
PASS(s)
—
--
PASS(s)
—
—
PASS($)
PIT:10.50 Special
92 —
—
PASS(s)
—
—
PASS(s)
—
—
PASS(s)
—
PASS(s)
7Q10:166.0 IWC(%):8.91 Order.
93 —
—
PASS(s)
—
—
PASS,PASS
GROVEL INDUSTRIES, INC. PERM CIIR LIM:6%
89 —
M
PASS
—
Ni
PASS
PASS
Ni
—
PASS
Ni
—
NC0004391 Begin:01/03/92 Frequency: Q PIP A FED MAY AUG NOV
NonComp:Single
00 PASS
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
County: POLK Region: ARO Suhhnsin: ('11106
91 •—
Ni
PASS
•--
bt
LATE
—
PASS
--
--
NR
PASS
PF:0.45 Special
92 —
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
7Q10:10.8 IWC(%):6.07 Order:
93 —
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
GUILF-ORD Co. SCHOOLS P1iRM CFIR IAM:99%(GRAIII 2/28/94-NOTOX LIM
80—
NC0038105 Begin:03/01/91. Frequency: Q I'll: A MAR JUN SEP DEC
NonConq+:
90 =•
--
---
--
...
...
--
._
...
—
,-,
—
County: GUll11)RD Regian:WSRO Suhbaxin:CP1703
91 —
—
Ni
—
—
NR
_
—
NR
—
—
M
PF:0.015 SpeclAl
92 FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
M
NR
Ni
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
7QIO:0.0 IWC(%):100 Order
93 FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
M
GIJILPORD MILLS EAST PERM CIIR LIM:19% (GRAD)
se —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
IA
—
—
NCUW2105 Begin;07/01/89 Fnapteney: Q 11/11 A JAN APR JUL OCI'
NonComp:
90 M
—
PASS
M
M
M
PASS
—
—
PASS
—
»
County:00111.I14 Region: WIRO Subbnsin: CPF22
91 PASS
—
—
b1
PASS
—
PASS
—•
—
PASS
—
—
141:0.e6511 Spo.•lel
09 rAll.
FAIT
FAIT.
rAll
FAIT
PASS
PASS
•••
•••
PASS
•••
...
7Q10:0.5W IWt'1'a.):I8.69 Irmtm'
0;1 PASS
--•
-•-
IAll.
PASS
...
0 2 consecutive failures = significant noncompliance Y I'm 1999 Data Available '
LEGEND:
PERM = Permit Requirement LET = Administrative Letter - Target Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q. Quanerly; M- Monthly: BM- Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually; OWD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement; IS- Conducting independent study
Beain = First month re ruirud 7QI0 = Receiving stream low 0nw criterion (cfs) A = quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure Months that testing must occur- ea. )AN,APR.JUI OCf NonComp = Current Compliance Requirement
PF = Permitted Dow (MGD) IWC%= lnstream waste Concentration P/l1= Pnas/Fatl chmnic test AC - Acute CIIR = Chronic
Data Notation: f - Fathead Minnow: • - Ceriodaphnia so.: my - Mvsid shrimp: ChV - Chronic value: P - Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration: at - Performed by DEM An Tax Group: bt - Bad test
Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR -Not reported;() -Beginning of Quarter Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive, N -Newly Issued(To construct); H -Active but not discharging; t-More data available for month in question SIG = ORC signature needed
26
14