20160979 Ver 2_Mitigation As-Built Plans_20200326

Bank Parcel Development Plan As -Built Report
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 20160979 V2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
March 2020
oC�CpbL�
D
MAR 2 6 2020
DE
TRANSPORTATION PERMITTCES
ING UNIT

Table of Contents
1.
Project Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach................................................................................................... 3
Riparian Restoration Activities........................................................................................................ 3
Riparian Enhancement Activities.................................................................................................... 4
Riparian Preservation Activities...................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 4
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance............................................................................................. 4
2.
Methods........................................................................................................................................... 5
3.
References........................................................................................................................................5
Appendix
A: Site Maps
Figure 1 - Site Location
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3 - As -Built Plat
Figure 4 - Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
Appendix
B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Sununary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stein Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix
C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix
D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

1. Project Summary
LI Project Location and Description
EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Monitoring Report for the Poplar Creek Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank
("Parcel"). This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey
(`USGS') 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201). In addition, it also provides nutrient offset
credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development
requiring such mitigation. This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 0213.0240 and the RES Poplar Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by
EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in
Appendix A. The Parcel has also been designed in concurrence with the Poplar Creek Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01985). The
mitigation plan for the Poplar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank has been submitted and approved
by the Interagency Review Team (IRT).
The Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield, NC (Figure 1).
The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100050 and North Carolina
Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Parcel head East on NC
70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south for approximately
a quarter of a mile, then turn left onto Lee Youngblood Loop. The coordinates of the site are 35.5521 - N, -
78.3568- W.
When combining the Poplar Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Poplar Creek Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals 23.59 acres and includes three
unnamed tributaries that drain to Poplar Creek. The drainage area of the Parcel is 0.3 mi'. The Parcel is
located in an area dominated by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the
Parcel was actively grazed pasture and disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices included the
maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation, maintained vegetation, grazed pasture, and agricultural
ponds. The Parcel also contained one agricultural pond that had been in place for at least 20 years.
The Poplar Creek Mitigation Site was built to provide stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation
on approximately 4,273 linear feet of streams through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation of
the Neuse riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite result in
immediate water quality benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel and include the removal of livestock
access to Parcel streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land -uses. The riparian restoration
activities within the Parcel also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed.
Poplar Creek 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site March 2020

1.2 Project Success Criteria
Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring will be based on the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.0. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a
minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least
5 months from initial planting. Four vegetation monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 M2 in
size and cover at least two percent of the riparian restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout
the planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset mitigation area and are representative of the crediting
areas. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or
volunteer), and grid location. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and
provided in the annual reports. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at
least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of the established
stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer
species may be included to meet the performance standards. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored
and treated so that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Poplar Creek
Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 93,766 ft2 of riparian buffer restoration credits (84, 875 ft2 from
backfilling and planting the pond), 76,454.5 ft- of riparian buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion,
8,220.5 ft2 of riparian buffer preservation credits, and 1,454.73 lbs of nutrient offset credits. These numbers
reflect some small changes in total credit amounts due to the use of the actual as -built survey top of bank
and tree line. The total restoration credit increased by 4,526 ft2, total enhancement credit decreased by 1,158
ft2, total preservation credit increased by 72 ft2, and total nutrient offset credit increased by 32 lbs.
The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated, service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit
HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Nitrogen nutrient
offsets generated services nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A
NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The
Sponsor maintains 3 credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer restoration credits, one ledger accounts
for buffer preservation and enhancement credits, and one accounts for nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All
mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential riparian buffer and
nutrient offset mitigation credits that the Poplar Creek Bank generates are summarized below.
Poplar Creek 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site March 2020

Table 1. Poplar Creek Mitigation Credits
Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Credit
Mitigation
Existing
Used
Credit
Per Acre
Ratio
%Full
Mitigation
Zone
Type
Type
Acreage
Acreage
Credit
Assets
Pond
Riparian
Restoration
1.95
1.95
43,560
1:1
100%
84,875 ft2
Footprints
Buffer
Riparian
Restoration
0.20
0.20
43,560
1:1
100%
8,891 ft2
Buffer
0-50'
Riparian
Enhancement
(via cattle
3.51
3.51
43,560
2:1
100%
76,454.5 ft'-
Buffer
uffe
exclusion
Riparian
Preservation:
Subject
3.94
1.89
43,560
10:1
100%
8,220.5 ft2
Buffer
Streams
Total Restoration
2.15
2.15
93,766 ft2 (2.15 ac)
Total Enhancement
3.51
3.51
76,454.5 ft2 (1.76 ac)
8,220.5 ft2 (0.19 ac)
Total Preservation
3.94
1.89
includes ratios & reductions
Nutrient Offset Credit
Zone
Credit
Mitigation
Acreage
Credit
per Acre
Ratio
Mitigation
Type
Type
Ibs
Assets
0-50'
Nitrogen
I Restoration
0.64
2273.02
N/A
1,454.73
Total
0.64
1 1,454.73
*According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (a) (4) and (5), "the area ofpreservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall
comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation ".
All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural.
Therefore, the 93,766 ft2 of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table above, can be used
for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. Neither riparian
buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits. The Sponsor
must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and
transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request
submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that
have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
Riparian Restoration Activities
Buffer restoration occurred along YB2-A and a small area on YB2-B, including the former agricultural
pond, in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) (Figure 2).
This pond was removed, and stream restoration was performed in the pond bottom. Stream Restoration
addressed impairments, which included the former pond, floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, nutrient
input, livestock access, and buffer degradation. The stream design approach included breaching the existing
dam and meandering the channel within the natural valley. Riparian restoration areas were planted from
top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to
achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. Furthermore, livestock exclusion fence was installed, to
remove access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS
specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid
regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Ater rubrum) and sweetgum (Liguidambar styraciflua).
Poplar Creek 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site March 2020

Furthennore, the lower portion of YB2-A, that was not within the pond foot print, was be perused for
nutrient offset credit, and is viable for buffer restoration crediting in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B
.0240. This area included the saine activities as described above.
Riparian Enhancement Activities
Buffer enhancement along YB2-B also occurs in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) (Figure 2). Where livestock were
present, livestock exclusion fence was installed, to remove access to riparian areas and their associated
streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may
require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple and sweetgum.
Minimal maintenance is anticipated due to the past land use history. Buffer enhancement can only generate
buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
Riparian Preservation Activities
Buffer preservation occurred along YB 1-C and YB3 in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5) (Figure 2). Preservation activities consisted of permanently protecting
the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of
the buffer. No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation was used for preservation credit
pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4) and the rest of the area is protected in the
conservation easement and not applied for credit. Furthermore, Buffer preservation can only generate buffer
mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale and Weakely (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May and December 2019.
Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can
be found in Table 2.
Stream construction activities were originally completed in May 2019. Based on a site visit conducted by
NCDWR on July 9", construction was determined to be incomplete until the IRT recommended updates
were made. Reaches YB1-C and YB2-B underwent significant stream repairs in the fall of 2019. Trees in
these two areas were replanted in December 2019. After all site work was complete, it was determined that
the original four vegetation plots, Vegetation Plot 1, 2, 3, and 4, for the Poplar Creek Riparian Buffer and
Nutrient Offset sections of the project were not impacted during site work and therefore were not
remeasured in December. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-01985), 401 (DWR # 16-0979), and NPDES
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 19-003-P) Permits. There were no easement changes between
BPDP approval and construction. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in
areas where livestock is present, and t-posts are used as physical barriers where livestock is not present.
1.6 Baseline Monitoring Performance
The Poplar Creek Baseline Monitoring activities were completed in June 2019. All Baseline Monitoring
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim
success criteria.
Poplar Creek 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site March 2020

Monitoring of the four permanent vegetation plots was completed during June 2019. Vegetation tables are
located in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. Monitoring Year 0 (MYO) monitoring
data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted
stem densities ranged from 809 to 1,174 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,083 planted steins per acre
across all plots. A total of 9 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at
baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average tree height observed was
1.7 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
2. Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at four pennanent vegetation plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
3. References
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Poplar Creek Buffer Mitigation Site — Bank
Parcel Development Plan
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpuibasin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Poplar Creek 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site March 2020

Appendix A - Site Maps

Qb
r b�
n sA�
� aadegt
E NezRre'3Lrua Ln
O
f�
4 V
4�
a
Mitthner br
F
E'
sr
c>
tP�+trerYa�.oro Ba ..
d
f3 prsrrY Tarr t r�`xibiftlr
Y +isf �y
�G
A
Gk;b
4�
u
,r Flurtrcy[St `�b1t �'
c
F.Trot�(�Gt
Aye, I
z
.s,
u
atrfa'3
Le end
l
® Proposed Easement
P
West ta'rte t,r
, Smith"eta
�sYYur r Ur
MufI,re,d
r
"'
N
e
Figure 3 - Existing Conditions Map
Date: 5/2412019
res
Drawn by: MDE
di4gw0
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
$
Checked by: RTM
1,000
2,000
Johnston County, North Carolina
f inch = 2.000 feet
Feet

YB3
^
a . E ..
—
�r
_
'�►'..� ^� td '�}pf_i. .-,t.�''�`".�►', _ _ - Mtt. �,�": 7F, �"k..'G y � ru '�a w�'�
fires
� 5
0 125 250
Feet
Figure 2 -
Current Conditions Plan View
Poplar Creek
Buffer Mitigation Site
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Date. 3/20/2020 Drawn by. MDE
_
Checked by: RTM 1 in = 250 feet
Legend
Proposed Easement
0 Vegetation Plot
Non-BPDP Fixed
Vegetation Plot
Non-BPDP
L
- Random Vegetation Plot
Restoration (0-50)
Enhancement (0-50)
'reservation (0-50)
Nutrient (0-50)
Pre -Con Pond Footprint
— Stream Alignment

x�'LS
� CBIraAtO IAC7tW R 019ee114
Ate 1A57ANCrS AAY M'MfTdV%.i[ r a o[rss ON YCAtiLMI�'A'f5 w
w.s WSW. a7wrAAsr Aersn
r *rcrs Aar s,a�r a. n«s scaksti.
Mr W'Fr0# 3 flAS ore s ID A•ort tM e p ft rwCs
A:wc r7x n1 s a P e.E[Ert .010 No aaa [ar
OF f SYvtNY ywE'5 rtAOqcW SV. Al rNS n✓r
5 c•ux7 wta Aim Asxw.Ex AvtcwR[7rox snoAx sr p,•r
atrconEn w xAr c+awrr [ro...cEs as m u R rrR
.� ren a,wr Arszrrr aF xxrc5
CONSERVATON EASEMENT
AREA T
i
k Lwlce.* a [axrrsLeow. -w
a Ra 2 at
PIS5; F� aa-tsr
50 OFFSEr
\\ r
\ eRR'A[r arorp0ASSROM .0
w i SAMS was
I
t A ,
r
K eM ^ M r0 rr
Cw {RA M
fgiE4"AE.KE at7 M A
(a. CCW>uTptJ
Ae[A r - Belt ACE
RIG t . tam Acl
ASP a . stp Ars
R[GR[G 1. as
I�\Y
0GN
cel
&0- o�®
roars•
a as ram m7lw9�tt ,r
K� ((� / aMOR a wrARtuORa r
E` a K ADS
30' CArr3Y'7 \ w rsM ot tI! QE top
`-ow pow FVOMWW
OR WASO7mw if wrtr'
t2 r W?COMM
l 2
f MIN &SiEMM
ARE, 4
Ck0 aJHD rY�•mF�N) —
h�
N-Es0.est 1569'-- f
ra.ruera we
LMxF• a rcAacRrw.
4a An
I
aww, a twxaa W • t�
M'Me,
MM TK�SsP.d F
\ .�\ NIIDr7 aElai[RN6KRfO1 •1! � -
\ \ �\ �$` MI Rf �PM7aR � �r�•
1
\ \ r
\
uLxNa
A : L1Qemww
0.
NO FOW7 27
... •. . 4OXAN O *NwWr Lent
—. -w-Oorwa cnw -0= uc
- LroM01wMN fAXW rr fasl-L.AR3 xW $1^4 a
. Arm AMIAMtON (O• W7
. PAC-00AIM4 1RN PAID 000+reen
�. RaAts MVACYMarr ro-soy
�. traetrr ov"MaroN fr-re17
. A FNW W"ff rt'.307
J
-�• crrsrr
' �a w AN. •G 70!
A9 51e. Po 221
-x AOvtbr- rt
itI t I'
_ Ell
�3
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
<� AREA 2
/k
EMEMW WK TABLE
LW /
DMCYKW
pSTANCE
Lr
sd"lli[•t
N00'
u
s srnvr E
Is, w
u
s stvr[r E
no,
LA
s ST724i E
mar
L$
ssomrol•t
".
W
S A•ist•Ar E
f w
L7
S atsrAr E
noW
Y
s arsr r• [
xar
to
slTrrsPE
t117'
{rt
s#Arre•E
mar
Of
s rAWw r
EERE'
LIr
s rr'ruset
E4-V
Ler
S Arlow- f
"A'
LIA
$ or'srArt
sl.Ar
Lu
says? M•r
rr.H•
.t
LPI, �Q
i. i uST♦
CONSERVATION EASEMENT t
AREA 3
F
` \ \
~ \ Sol RRtr M std
`\; xaI�NF1R
•
/ /yp'Y
wL eNmi+1
7{artr y. •{Ex
AaY[u aCC
ro eAu. rc o➢
50' 1-lu
FASSA VI LW W"
l
IaNE /
AftTMW
JDWAWE
to
s RrrR•JR• t
EY.1r
up
s ta'Ossr• t
L40•'
Lra
s WN14' t
E-W
tit
s awmirE
n.Ar
Lae
s IMIWE
sr,7r
at
s sorry t
tatr
Lu
sM• w*r
nyr
yr
s arm•r.• t
rear•
[H
SlrsFYS'f
mFY
tIr
s RPrt 10• f
asr
LN
ss"rWf
.,W
LIT
s s0'IA101• f
mar
W
s A1R1'E7' E
mar
W
5 At07`r1• E
Nor
Lae
S N01'N' f
rRN'
NUTRIENT OFFSET CREDIT
ZONE
!MITIGATION
CREDITYM TYPE
_
AREAJSO. FT.)
ARMACRES)
NITROGEN RESTORATION
27662
O.bt
TOTAL NITROGEN OFFSETS --_-
27,662
RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDIT
RIPARIAN ZONE
MITIGATION TYPE
AREA(SO, FT.)
_
AWMACRM
POND FOOTPRINT
RESTORATION
84.875
1.95
050,
RESTORATION
8.01 _
0.20
ENHANCEMENT
1S21909
171,427
3,52
3.94
PRESERVATION
TOTAL RESTORATION 93.766
2,15
_
TOTAL ENHANCEMENT 152,909
3.51
TOTAL PRESERVATION, 171.427 __
3,gq
t a PEST J
L oat -ISO n
t =['� jkilyHi\l�1!ff/i1�1
oc
IS%
°po A aAOE7_
tlP•M6 M�
S1
L-0r2 Q)
G O/ c
ifR.W►•4�P�
nand
t CF 1
J
"
W
Z
o
N
nj
o
z
J
o
�
In
a
z
W
0
�
m
Q Z
W
Z
o
W
0
" OC
cc
H
W
cc
Z
W
0
IL
013
cc
o
0
IL
W
cc
�tsv
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST, SUITE
KINSTON, NC 28501
A
TL'L: 252-522-2500
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC. /r P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor®rt•atrvxeosGrrat
.Rew n 7%11/2020 1 1 150'�
ft
2�ODo6
Mwrt
POf+LAR CREEIc EWFi'fRS.owc

5�.
t
%,Kr fd.Y
Ya[$isL�a9T#ffi YY MXi
�
tz+.r:a+x a..raz
5qT �"'v'i 88IiX
MATCH LINE SEE DWG NO. ESC2
LEGEND
t
V—�-W EXISTING TfiEELINE ;"-"1` Y e^!"Y`f`"�
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Lo o -
PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CHANNEL PLUG
(SEE DETAIL OVrG W)
SILT FENCE
STAGING'STOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
HAUL ROUTE
V
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
ROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION �I
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE. 20.7 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT 28.6 ACRES
WK
i
DICKSON
OMrb>tiaWy w*&w m Fa a
rae"+illog" ♦ vowanwlaw
ugomOewko +Oaomdn
720 Cor)wrala lkke
Raleigh. NC 27d07
(v) 919.762.0495
{IX 8X9.7S2.9dT2
µuHl.".�(l
2fiSB7
� SEIII..ol
•m�aiaaax"'�'�
3.1452Otq
FtIL SCALE 1'=W
0 60 1So
Z' =FUEL SCNF
I�a
n
I i
z
0
F
v
a
co
z
0
U
Q
QLL
W
i N
_ LL
f o�¢
1gS( 1 J
`2LLJ
�¢
4 Z
Q
3: g
tJ o
IL O 4
U CJ
g z
d
oz
z
z�o
PROU DATE. tAR 2utp
OC:. TLM
U.C. DATE: AAAR 2019
DRAINING MAIM
ESC1
PRW. No
20170243.0O.RA
WPYRGHI C. WX =KSONd CO„ MX:. ALL REC+EW5WUWOA U$t OF THECONTENTS OF TM NT: ADDITIONS DR DELfF1ON.`i TO TH4S OOCUME . LN WHOL .5.lN PART. WATHOW WTMM CONMNT OF INK DIMON A CO.. M'C:,- IS PROI{WE. ONLY COPIES MM THE ORIGINAL OF THE UOGUMEM. MARNEO W11HANCAIGINI&L MINIATURE AND SM SHAU RE COWIVERED TC
FIIENAME O:_._. _--.. _.-_.: Fx%inamneatelSdutlorw'.2.tt1702439GRA TOt3 _ Crpg�Ma,: any 01ItPut?8att20F7C¢a:700FW SH[ F3C.dw9 March tA.20/9 NthmaiNUMIw� _. _ -. -.-

i
� � f
e sinxetsR Pr.; rx f ff��
aacwr A'wYNNr.x3p JR,CA / /f rV
y� imt,4emaaeal ,t e
�t t %
d
t'MYAtrP tGIMBrGOq Lt.q
masstAUaAamNaN
+sN.NsoAlAax>ar
tAlb
Vt!
i iFdtT Y. KkCF
� #F PA�t9YAR AHNrx:
,IJi' h
se m ki.
I'S
Of
f ,
L y+
.� r\
rEKHMY KCE[.
�'Aad.9AAiCYfiNE+[+
+` .fit A4Ri Pw 1eA
F:
�r
r 0.
_j
'raw
f •'t P �
t PUMA&4CE8 C4
F� di41 P(iaM
\ � c
t,
DAM BREACH PERFORMED M-
\i ._ .. -1.. ..._.
RV
LWTM VCO AA CREEK I i PItl6nIA Gt lKh ::
RE BREACH PVOY DATED
t 1h,.7Ti8 RY WIt pCA$ON i `\ t
\,k ' AA j4 Rom. kll� Y
MATCH LINE SEE DWG NO. ESC1
OF 111B O DE .M W+IOCEp
6tte,CADo',Pkv+S4ri2Gf 70:4300Rn SMT FSC a,y; UA-Y 14. 20t9 NopeN Nr+Sgan
REACH Y83 LOCATION
LEGEND
EXISTING TREELINE i Y'Y'•Y'Y"'Y"`/"'l
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR - .,_.... .»_.. ..,._
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR .. -
PROPOSED CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE —L,OD
PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED CKANNEL PLUG
fSEE DETAIL DWG D2)
SXT FENCE---#--#—M—
STAGINGWOCKPILE AREA
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
RAUL ROME
v
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
PROPOSED PUMP AROUND LOCATION a.-I'"�'"I►- 1/
ROCK PIPE NLET PROTECTION
TOTAL AREA Of DISTURBANCE 20 7 ACRES
TOTAL AREA OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT 23 6 ACRES
WD KSON
aLIM'.W4 ulstidiNllt
I,M,.Po uom + Mow """am
U,b-o..Mpw,w ♦ G.W.NNa
720 Corpows Dmg
RAbigR, NC 27607
%91H.762.Ot95
Q) 919.792.9672
wtwrwkdlckaon can
�O.•'pESSt �' �
S3E�AL =_
�•.��✓"'{ gyp; ``
N. Pt,
FULL SCALE 1*-W
0 d0 tfip
2• = fuLLscALE
o
I
I
i
Z
Z
O
' p
O
LL
W
N DF
W
Q r µ� Q
W W
Z
z<
z E�
8
¢p
!Q crz $
0- 0 w e
IL
CC 0 I
g
PWU DATE, 20/p
o.c.
OC. DATE. MAR 2019
WAY04G NUMBER: .
E V C2
PRUJ. NO.
20170243.00.RA

TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - FALL
SEEDINGMIKTURE
SPECIES -RATE (LBIACREI
RYE (GRAIN) 120
SEEDING DATES:
MOUNTAINS - AUG. 15 - DEC. 15
COASTAL PLAIN AND PIEDMONT -AUG. 15 - DEC. 30
SOIL AMENDMENTS;
FOLLOW SON. TESTS OR APPLY, ZODD LBIACRE GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE
AND i,DDD LBIACRE 1440.10 FERTILIZER.
MULCH:
APPLY 4,000 LBIACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING,
OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL,
MAINTENANCE:
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY;TOPORESS WITH 50
LBIACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO'EXTEND TEMPORARY
COVER BEYOND JUNE'15, OVERSEED WITH 50 LSIACRE KOBE (PIEDMONTANO
COASTALPLAIN).
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - LATE WINTERIEARLY SPRING
SEEDING MIXTURE:
SPECIES - RATE (USIACRE)
RYE (GRAIN) 120
SEEDING DATES:
MOUNTAI4S-ABOVE2509FT: FE6.15-MAY15 BELO:V25own FT:6.1•MAY1
PIEDMONT -.JAM. 1-MAY 1
COASTAL PLAIN - DEC-T-APR 15
SO' It. AMENDMENTS:
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,00018!ACRE.GROUND
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LWACRE 10.10.10FERTILIZER
MULCH;
APPLY 4AW LBIACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW SY TACKING WTH ASPHALT, NETTING
ORAMULCH ANCHORINGTOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL
MAINTENANCE:
REFERTIUZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLYADEQUATE, RESEED. REFERTILIZE AND
MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE
EROSION CONTROL:
GENERAL NOTES
1, REVISEWCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROLMEASURES. ALL PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY
EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES (LE ROCK CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCE ANDTEMPORARY•CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES)
SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE LAND.DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
2. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AREAS SHOWN ARE TO GUIDE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER IF ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES WILL IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF
CONSTRUCTION,
3. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SEEDED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THE SEEDING SCHEDULE
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET,
4, MULCH: APPLY 2 TONSIACRE GRAIN STRAW ON ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS.
S. EROSION CONTROL'
A. INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER AND THE LONG-TERM EROSION PROTECTION MEASURES OR STRUCTURES
S. PROVIDE FOR HANDLING THE INCREASED RUNOFF -CAUSED BY CHANGED SOIL AND SURFACE CONDITIONS. USE
EFFECTIVE MEANS TO CONSERVE EXISTING ON -SITE SOIL CONDITIONS.
C. DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ALL DISTURBEDARFAS SHALL BE STABILRED AT THE END OF. EACH WORKING DAY.
USE TEMPORARY PLANT COVER, MULCHING, ANDIOR STRUCTURESTO:CONTROL RUNOFF AND PROTECT AREAS
SUBJECT TO EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION.
D. ALL SEDIMENT AND,EROSION CONTROLS ARE TO BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT OF. GREATER THAN 0.5INCHES OF PRECiPITATtOR DURING ANY 244HOUR PERIOD.
MAINTENANCE OF SEDIMENT TRAPPING STRUCTURES SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY PER THESEINSPECTIONS;
SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
E. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AT THE END OF EACH DAY IN PORTIONS OF THE,SITE WHERE
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED, GROUNDCOVER MUST BE ESTABLISHED
PER THE -GROUND COVER SCHEDULE° SHOWN ON THIS SHEET IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY
CEASED. ALL AREAS WI-MRE FINAL GRADE HAS, BEEN ESTABLISHED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITHIN 2
CALENDAR DAYS.
F. CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THE NECESSARY ACTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIRE WASHING STATIONS AT EACH
ACCESS POINT TOMINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF MUD ONTO THE PAVED ROADWAY. FROM CONSTRUCTION AREAS. DAILY
REtAOVALOF MUDISOIL MAY BE REQUIRED,
G. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING All PHASES.OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE
COMPLETION OF ALL ACTIVITIES AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE, BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL
CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO CONTROL EROSION ANDIOR OFF SITE
SEDIMENTATION CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS
COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED. A MAXIMUM OF 200 LINEAR FEET OF STREMA MAY BEDISTUREM AT ANY ONE
TIME STABILIZE STREMA BANKS IMMEOATELY AFTER GRADING,
H. EROSION CONTROL MATTING (SEE DETAIL SHEET 01) SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL BANKS
FROM APPROXNAATELY 2V TO SAY ABOVE TOP OF BANK DOWN TO CHANNEL TOE.
1. SILT FENCING TO BE INSTALLED AROUND INDICATED STOCKPILE AREAS TO PREVENT LOSS OF SEDIMENT. STOCKPILE
AREAS MAY BE RELOCATED UPON APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER,
J, ASPHALT TACKIFIER SHALL NOT BE. USED.
K ALL NECESSARY FEASURES MUST BE TAKEN TO PREVENT OIL TAR, TRASH, AND OTHER POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING
THE ADJACENT OFF SITE AREAS.
L. WETLANDSISTAWAS CANNOT BE ENCROACHED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IF NOT APPROVED AS DESIGNATED
tMPACTAREAS.
M. ACTIVITIES MUST AVOID DISTURBANCE OF WOODY RIPARIAN VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA TO.THE
GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICABLE, REMOVAL OF VEGETATION MUST 13E LIMITED TO ONLY THAT NECESSARY FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL
N. NO ONSITE BURIAL OF VEGETATION OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE PERMITTED, VEGETATIVE DEBRIS SHALL BE
STOCKPILED AND DISPOSED OF ONSITE PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER,
0: ANY GRADING BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
P. PLEASE REFERENCE PLAN SHEET DETAILS AND NCDENR STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES.
0, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES RELATED TO THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE,
R. THE LOCATIONS OF SOME EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY I IAVETO BE ALTERED FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE
PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS CHANGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
S. IF IT IS DETERMINED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION THAT SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS LEAVING THE SITE
(DESPITE THE PROPER WPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES), THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS OBLIGATED TO TAKE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE ACTION.
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE - SUMMER
SEEDINGPAIXTLIRE:
SPECIES RATE (LBIACRE)
GERMAN MILLET' 40
IN THE PIEDMONT AND MOUNTAINS. A SMALL -STEMMED SUDHNGRASS MAY BE
SUBSTITUTE[) AT A RATE OF 50 LSfACRE,
SEEDING GATES;
MOUNTAINS -MAY IS-AUG. 15
PIEDMONT -MAY 1-AUG, 15
COASTALPLAIN -APR. 15-AUG. 15
SOILAMENDMENTS:
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,0W LBIACRE GROUND
AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 75o. LSIACRE 10-ICA0 FERTW2ER
MULCH;
APPLY 4,001) LBIACRE STRAW. ANCHORSTRAW SY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING
OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
USED AS AN ANCHORING TOOL,
MAINTENANCE:
REFERTILI2E IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED. FERTILIZE AND MULCH
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE
GROUND COVER SCHEDULE
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATIONTLME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQVY) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
IF SLOPESARE19 OR LESS IN'LENGTH AND ARE
SLOPES STEEPERTHAN It
-
TDAyS
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLO'NED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN
LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HWQ
FLATTER THAN 4:1
ZONES)
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
14OH32-1949 FOR UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
1. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DESCRIBED INTHE EROSION CONTROL PLAN .AND NOTES, EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE PHASED -IN TO THOSE AREAS OF THE PROJECT CURRENTLY BEINGWORKEUON,THE
5. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, STABILIZED GRAVEL ENTRANCE!EXIT-AND ROUTES OF INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE
CONTRACTOR MAYMODIFY OR RELOCATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS FOR
ESTABLSHEO AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND DETAILS.
UNFORESEEN FIELD CONDITIONS SO LONG AS PROPER CONSTRUCTION IS MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY
AND USEFULNESS OF THE PROPOSED MEASURES. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ALONG CULANNEL BANKS SHALL BE
0, INSTALL ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT TRAPS AND PIPE OUTLET PROTECTION (PER NCDOT 1535.02) FOR
STABILIZED WTH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH At THE END OF EACH DAY.
LEE-YOUNGBLOOD ROAD PIPE AS SHOWN ON PLANS,
2. IN GENERAL, STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED FROM AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION.
7. INSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS AS SHOWN ON PLANS, TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS S14OULD. ONLY
BE INSTALLED WHEN NECESSARY. (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET D5)
3. EXISTING WETLANDS CANNOT BE ENCROACHED UPON UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IF NOT APPROVED AS
DESGNATED IMPACTAREAS. HIGH VISIBILITY FENCING MUST BE PLACED AROUND ALL EXISTING WETLANDS THAT
8. PREPARE STAGING AND STOCKPILING AREAS IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS OR AS
ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ANWOR ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPOSED
APPROVED BY THEENGINEER.• ANY EXCESS SPOIL FROM STREAM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE USED' CONSTRUCT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
CHANNEL PLUGS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
4. DURING STREAM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING
9. ALL PROPOSED CHANNELS AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT. CROSSINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A DRY
AND AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
CONDITION VIA OFFUNE CONSTRUCTION WHEREPOSSIBLE PUMP AROUND OPERATIONS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO
AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS OVERLAP,
-
5. STOCKPILE AREAS AND TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS MAYBE RELOCATED OR ADDED UPON THE APPROVAL OF
-
THE ENGINEER AND DEMLR PALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE. SILT FCNCING MUST BE INSTALLEGAROUNO ALL STOCKPILE
10, INSTALL PUMP AROUND APPARATUS AND IMPERVIOUS DIKES AT UPSTREAM END OFPROJECT. ASCONSTRUCTION
AREAS,
PROGRESSES, MOVE PUMP AROUND OPERATION DOWNSTREAMt (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET DI)
S. THE WORK TORESHAPETHE CHANNEL BANKS WILL BE PERFORMED USING EQUIPMENT WORKING FROM THE TOP OF
THE EXISTING STREAM BANK WHERE POSSIBLE-
7. -CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WILLNOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE ACTIVE CHANNEL 70 PERFORM WORK IF POSSIBLE.
PLATFORMS SHOULD BE USED TO CROSS CHANNEL WHERE ACCESS IS NOT POSSIBLE.
S. NO MORE C14ANNEL SHALL BE DISTURBED THAN CAN BE STABILIZED BY THE END OF THE WORK DAY OR PRIOR TO
RESTORING FLOW TO NEWLY CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL SEGMENTS.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. A MAXIMUM OF,200 LINEAR FEET OF STREAM MAYBE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TVAE. STABILIZE
STREAM BANKS PAMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING.
10, ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST BE PLACEDWIHW DESIGNATED STOCKPILE AREAS.
11. AT LOCATIONS IN t6141CH THE EXISTING CHANNEL IS BEING MAINTAINED, TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND DAMS AND
BYPASS PUMPING WILL BE USED TO OE -WATER THE WORKAM AS DESCRIBED IN THE OETALS,
12, WHEN THE PROPOSED CHANNEL HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT. EROSION, ALL TEMPORARY
PUMP AROUND DAMS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ACTIVE STREAM CHANNEL NORMAL FLOW RESTORED.
ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN DESIGNATED SPOILS AREAS PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND DAM.
13. AT LOCATIONS IN WHICH ROCKSTRUCTURES, BOULDER TOE STABILIZATION, AND LOG TOE STABILIZATION ARE
:CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS, TEMPORARY COFFERDAMS AND BYPASS PUMPING WILL BE USED TO OE -WATER THE
WORK AREA; EXCEPT AT LOCATIONS W WHICH THE NORMAL FLOW CAN BE DIVERTED AROUND THE WORK AREA
STABILIZEDRESTRAIN
tIATH THE USE OF AN EXISTING CHANNEL. WHEN THE TOE FIRS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STAB L2E TOEROSION ALL TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ACTIVE. STREAM CHANNEL AND NORMAL
FLOWRESTORED. ACCUMULATEDSEAIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OFIN DESIGNATED SPOILS AREA PRIOR TO
REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY COFFER DAM..
14 MATERIAL,7HAT IS REMOVED FROM THE STREAM WILL BERE-OEPOSITED OUTSIDE OF THE ACTIVE CHANNEL AND ITS
FLOODPLAIN.
15. TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED GRASSED AREAS AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL
BANKS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEEDING AND MULCHING SPECIFICATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
18, RE -FERTILIZE AND RE -SEED DISTURBED AREAS IF NECESSARY.
17. TEMPORARY ANWOR PERMANENT IMPACTS TO EXISTING WETLANDS SHALL BE AVOIDED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE.
HIGH VISIBILITY FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL EXISTING WETLANDS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT
AREA ANDIOR ADJACENT TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES,
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE SELF INSPECTIONS ANDld,ONITORING AS OUTLINED IN THE SELF-INSPECTION.AND
SELF -MONITORING COMBINED FORM LOCATED AT.
httpOldeq.xTHIS FORM SHOULD BE UP TO
DATE AND AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES,
10, DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT DAVID GODLEY, RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC AT (919) 723-82 0.
STREAM CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
I, CONDUCT PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING INCLUDING OWNER; ENGINEER, ASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS, AND OTHER
AFFECTED PARTIES.
2 OBTAIN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT FROM NCDENR- LAND QUALITY SECTION AND ALL OTHER APPROVALS
NECESSARY TO BEGIN AND COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
3, CONTRACTOR S FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPRIATE PARTIES PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT THE DEMLR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE AT 919-791.420048 HOURS
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
4, CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT UTIU71ES
ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE. COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. CALL NC ONE -CALL (PREVIOUSLY ULOCO) AT
11, CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM PORTION OF THE CHANNEL FIRST, WORKING IN AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM
DIRECTION. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER,
12. ROUGH GRADING OF CHANNEL SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES.
13, INSTALL STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DETAILS. PRIOR TO FINE GRADING, OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE
ENGINEER ON INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES.
14. UPON COMPLETION OF FINE GRADING, INSTALL STREAM BANK STABILIZATION INCLUDING, EROSION CONTROL
MATTING OR SOD MATS ALONG CHANNEL BANKS.
15. FILL AND STABILIZE ABANDONED SEGMENTS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL PER DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
W ALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND PUMPING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM AT THE END OF EACH
DAY TO RESTORENORMAL FLOW BACK TO THE CHANNEL
I?. DURING STREAM CONSTRUCTION ACTIN! TIES, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING
AND AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY.
18. INSTALL LIVE STAKE, SAKE ROOT, AND CONTAINERIZED PLANTINGS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANTING PLANS.
DNEKSON
mmruoify l:mstrrelu�a anszGtanro
Traupo4a%n r Wew Rascu=s
ue.wa0,vwp. nt +GeaWnpics
720 Corporate CyNe
RaMkjN NC 276M
M 919,782,0495
p) 910.7829872
Pn .mkdt`CIR.fOmc0f 1
rcumr-w.rmv
�nw�tuur��
O!Y_h
QSN
ray'?- pFESS/Oti
¢� SEAL
r-f D fi
O
l'a O ....
mwuRnmi•
$ I`i• 2blel
m
ii
a
IL
Z
O
U
Z
U
O. Q
.0
iU W
uT o w
O w
N � Q
,w r
W Z
F 2
z< m 0
X: O o
a
0 0O _j
O
¢ O U�
U :U ZO m
so 0 �Z
4 W cr
UU O
W
ga = ¢"
Z N I
� ppX9
PROD. DATE '*4,R 2019
(TLM
O.C. DATE: tlAR 2D19
DRAWING NUMBER
ES_ C3 _
PROD. NO.:
20170243.00.RA

Appendix B - Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,000
River Birch
Betula nigra
1.500
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
1,500
Water Tupelo
Nyssa aquatica
1.200
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
1,200
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
1,200
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
1,200
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
1,200
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1,000
Tuliptree
Liriodendron tulipifera
1.000
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
1,000
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
600
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
500
White Dogwood
Cornus forida
400
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
400
American Hazelnut
Con,lus americana
200
Total
16100
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Planted
Volunteers
Success Criteria
Average Stem
Plot #
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Total Stems/Acre
Met?
Height (ft)
1
1174
0
1174
Yes
1.8
2
1174
0
1 174
Yes
1.7
3
1174
0
1174
Yes
1.6
4 809 0 809 Yes 1.6
Project Avg 1083 0 1083 Yes 1.7

Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Plot
Po lar Creek
Current Plot Data MYO 2019
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
06062019-01-0001
06062019-01-0002
06062019-01-0003
06062019-01-0004
MYO 2019
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula ni ra
river birch
Tree
18
18
18
8
8
8
4
4
4
3
3
3
33
33
33
Ce halanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
I
1
1
I
Diospyros vir iniana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
2 1
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
6
6
6
Liriodendron tuli i era
tuli tree
Tree
i
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
10
10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
8
8
8
5
5
5 1
15
15
15
uercus
oak
Tree
1
I
1
10
10
10
15
15
15
7
7
7
33
33
33
uercusl rata
overcup oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
uercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
I
uercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
20
20
20
107
107
107
1
I
1
1
4
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.10
7
1 7
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
10
10
10
1174
1 1174
1 1174
1174
1174
1174
1174
1174
1174
1 809`.4
809.4
809.4
1083
1083
1083

Appendix C - Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Photos

Poplar Creek MYO Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegatation Plot 1
AL-
Vegatation Plot 2
Vegatation Plot 4

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0001 .run 2019 Data N THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5): 1� Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.554801 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m) -78 35008 UTM Zone: 17N
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 180
Date last planted:
New lasting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled. specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
1cm* I cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Icm* 1 cm sprout
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Quercus lyrata
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus lyrata
Betula nigra
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
$)
®
O
O
O
Q
O
Q
O
®
w
O
Q
O
O
©
®
O
O
®
O
R
R '
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.4
1.5
2.8
3.7
4.9
6.0
7.2
8.2
9.4
9.7
8.2
6.1
4.7
2.9
1.1
1.1 >
2.5
4.5
6.4
8.3
9.9
9.7
8.6
7.4
5.7
4.5
2.9
1.5
0.4
0.4
0A
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.2
1.3
1.4
3.8
4.0
3.6
3.1
2.9
2.6
5.4
5.8
6.2
6.5
7.1
7.7
9.1
9.7
9.7
9.4
8.9
8.6
8.7
60.0
60.0
82.0
62.0
64.0
57.0
53.0
57.0
71.0
52.0
59.0
53.0
51.0
58.0
54.0
45.0
50.0
56.0
42.0
53.0
52.0
53.0
61.0
42.0
51.0
34.0
56.0
51.0
El
El
El
Ll
El
El
El
El
El
El
El
1
LL
*SOURCE: Tr=Trans lant. L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. I
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50em if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entn Tool rer. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0001 Jun Lull Uata N 1H1N YtAWN UAIA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
29 Betula nigra ® R 0.2 8.4 54.0
# stems: 29 New Stems. not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Isulaamdii-0*:
ei ht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 1 Cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100em ❑ 1 Tom
Species Name
Q
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub,
seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcctoff>locmorsubsample?100%. *1
02
•
3
••
64
•
NS
•�
6
•
}j-�8
j
1F
::
0 FomnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake B=Ba11 and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair. *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, D1Seased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m Printed in the CVS-EEPEnoy Tool ver. 2.3.1

Ma p_ P
of stems on lot 06062019-01-0001 X-axis: 180. # stems: 29
map size:
;CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems N 0small
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").
--------------------------------------------------'
Y
(0,0) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2--fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DIScased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I0cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool rer. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0002 arty: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/vy? E
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.554062 Datum: NAD27
(dec.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -78350322 UTM Zone: 17N
M-
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 25
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: [77T0 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Jun 2019 Data
Height DBH
Icm* 1 cm
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Quercus phellos
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Quercus sp.
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Betula nigra
O
O
&
©
Q
@
O
Q
O
Q
O
®
O
O
®
O
Q
Q
Q
®
©
O
0
0
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.6
1.3
2.7
4.3
5.7
7.4
9.5
8.3
7 3
6.4
5.5
4.4
3.4
2.2
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.6
2.9
4.3
5.5
6.7
8.3
9.5
9.8
9.0
7.5
6.1
4.3
0.5
3.1
2.5
2.0
1.2
0.9
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.7
4.2
4.5
4.8
5.3
5.9
6.2
9.4
8.7
8.0
7.4
7.1
6.7
6.1
6.0
8.7
9.0
9.3
9.5
9.8
76.0
67.0
69.0
20.0
22.0
15.0
59.0
49.0
54.0
50.0
80.0
52.0
55.0
69.0
22.0
32.0
540
81.0
31.0
70.0
70.0
42.0
590
50.0
19.0
68.0
45.0
48.0
66.0
❑
❑
El
❑
El
El
❑
❑
❑
LL
n
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant. L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, AN1Mal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50em if>4m Printed in the C6S-EEP EntrY Tool ,yen 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0002 dun
map source X Y ddh
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm)
0
Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) . (cm) sprout
#stems: 29 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (�Y) Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
Exulanation of cut-*
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamoline**:
ei ht Cut-0ff (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IUCM ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cur
137 cm
Sub-
sap]
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
*"Required ifcrt-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •1
•2
•
•3
••
t 164
•
N5
••
i• :6
:
8
::I:Z
mt
0 FoWS2,ver9.l
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR:4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=tnissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Enoy Toot ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems - on- Mot _ 06062019-01-0002
;CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y:St
m
®
� O
Qf
C
j
T
�®
G)
0
O
O
f
CA
(0,0)
X:5nt
X-axis: 25 ° # stems: 29
N map size:
G small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2--fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMplcd, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=trussing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Bntry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 06062019-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): 1-11 Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.553576 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m) -78 350731 1JTM Zone: 1 NN
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 1 180
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: Date last planted:
New lasting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0 Im 0.1m
,Tun 2019 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* I cm sprout
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Liriodendron tulipifera
Platanus occidentalis
Liriodendron tulipifera
Betula tugs
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Diospyros virginiana
Diospyros virginiana
Betula nigra
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Quercus sp.
Betula nigra
Quercus sp
Quercus sp.
®
©
O
Q
O
O
©
O
O
0
Q
Q
O
Q
u
Q
O
®
©
©
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.3
5.1
5.0
5.1
4.9
5D
5.1
4.9
4.9
7.6
7.6
79
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.3
7.2
9.7
9.7
9.8
0.3
5.2
6.1
9.8
8.3
6.9
5.3
3.8
2.7
1.2
0.5
1.8
2.9
4.1
5.5
6.9
8.2
9A
9.8
8.8
7.5
6.2
4.7
3.0
1.6
0.4
0.7
2.0
3.1
55.0
56.0
58.0
50.0
76.0
51.0
46,0
420
49.0
73.0
47.0
45.0
65.0
46.0
40.0
55.0
49.0
51.0
48.0
520
45.0
48.0
20.0
20.0
50.0
15.0
50.0
49.0
55.0
El
El
El
1-1
El
❑
EJ
❑
[]
El
El
El
El
171
El
71
El
El
I
*SOURCE: Tr=Trans lant. L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown
*VIGOR: 4=excellent; 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50em if>4m. Printed in the CV5-EEP Ennp Tool ,per. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0003 Jun 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
# stems: 29 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
:d
lanation of out -off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & suhsamdinQ**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.�ExOcm❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Suh- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cit-off >1 Ocm or subsample?100%. •1
021
•�4
�•5
:46
::1
}ZJ
::0 FormWS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2--fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=atissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEmn: Tool ver. 1.3.1

Map_ of stems- on-P _ lot_ 06062019-01-0003 __ _ _--------- X-axis: 180 map size::
° #stems:29
------ - - - ------�
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems N 0 small
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(010) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0004 arty: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? 0
VV1D Year (1-5): PfDate: / / / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or LITM-N: 35.55284 Datum- NAD27
(dec.deg. or n') 78 351369 LJTM Zone: 17N
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 60
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
.fun 2019 Data N THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O lm Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout `
90 Quercus sp. ® R 0.8 9.4 35.0
91 Diospyros virginiana ® R 0.1 7.7 61.0
92 Betula nigra O R 0.1 0.5 55.0
93 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 0.9 2.3 55.0
94 Betula nigra R 1.2 3.9 53.0
95 Quercus sp. R IA 5.9 52.0 El
96 Liriodendron tulipifera R 2.3 7.6 51 0
97 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 2.9 9.1 55.0
98 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 6.8 9.3 49.0 ❑
99 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.5 8.5 45.0 ❑
100 Quercus phellos R 6.3 7.1 500 ❑
101 Quercus sp. Uj R 6.0 5.9 53.0 ❑
102 Benda nigra O R 5.3 43 52.0 ❑
103 Cephalanthus occidentalis Q R 4.5 2.8 45.0 El
104 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 4.0 1.3 46.0 ❑
105 Quercus sp. ® R 7.4 1.0 54.0 ❑
106 Quercus sp. Q R 8.1 2.4 600 Ll
107 Quercus sp. Q R 8.7 4.0 30.0
108 Quercus sp. O R 9.4 5.4 44.0
109 Liriodendron tulipifera © R 9.7 0.8 51.0 ❑
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Fonn:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burls P=Potted Tu=Tubline R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P. 10
*VIGOR: 4=excellent; 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, D1Seased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNoNvn, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Enn7� Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0004
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Jun 2019 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & sulsampling_****:
ei htCut-Off(Allsteinsshorterthanthisareignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 5 cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
10
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH) j
**Required ifcut-off >1Ocm or subsample?100%. 01
•2
•
03
••
$4
•
*45
••
:46
•
f•7
j�
8
�
�
}{
�
=0 FoWS2,ver9.1
rm
Map of stems on plot 06062019-01-0004
Y
((),0) X:5nt
X-axis: 60 ° N # stems: 20
map size:
0 small
*SOURCE: Tr --Transplant, L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted Tu=Tublin R=bare Root M=Mechanicall U=Unknown P.
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to IOcm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entn, Tool ver. 2.3.1