WQ0006984_BIMS Report_20200317

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0006984 Effective: 04/17/18 Expiration: 03/31/23 Owner : South Fork Industries Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: South Fork Industries RLAP
County: Catawba 100 W Pine St
Region: Mooresville
Maiden NC 28650
Contact Person: Fred Poovey Title: President Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: LA,
Primary ORC: Robert Michael Cox Certification: 13191 Phone: [phone]
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NC0006190 South Fork Industries Inc - South Fork Industries - Maiden Plant
Inspection Date: 03/17/2020 Entry Time 08:15AM Exit Time: 02:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Edward Watson Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Annual Report Review
Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids (503)
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Treatment
Sampling Pathogen and Vector Attraction
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 4

Permit: WQ0006984 Owner - Facility: South Fork Industries Inc
Inspection Date: 03/17/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This is an AR review for residuals application that occurred with regards to permit WQ0006984.
Land Apllication of residuals occurred on sis permitted fields with a total of 182.52 Dry Tons of residuals being applied
across a total of 65.5 acres.
PAN calculation appear to be correct and the AR indicates that PAN is within the limit of the permit
SAR calculations aslo appear to have been correctly performed.
All calculations have been presented in the AR.
TCLP calculations were performed and there are no elevated metals present in the residual from the South Fork facility.
Volitile Organic Compounds(VOCs)sampling was also performed with a result of non -detect for VOC constituents.
The AR appears to be in compliance with the permit.
Page 2 of 4

Permit: WQ0006984 Owner - Facility: South Fork Industries Inc
Inspection Date: 03/17/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Distribution and Marketing ❑
Land Application
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are there any GW quality violations?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Is a copy of current permit on -site?
❑
❑ ❑
Are current metals and nutrient analysis available?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
a. TCLP analysis?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are PAN balances being maintained?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are PAN balances within permit limits?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has land application equipment been calibrated?
❑
❑ ❑
Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Are there pH records for the land application site?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are hauling records available?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Comment: This is an AR review. A site visit was not conducted during this review.
Pathogen and Vector Attraction
Yes No NA NE
a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B)
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram
❑
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram
Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only)
❑
❑ ❑
Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram
❑
b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A)
❑
❑ ❑
c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B)
❑
❑ ❑
Temperature corrected
❑
d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day)
❑
❑ ❑
Page 3 of 4

Permit: WQ0006984 Owner - Facility: South Fork Industries Inc
Inspection Date: 03/17/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine
e. Time/Temp on: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Digester (MCRT)
Compost ❑
Class A lime stabilization ❑
f. Volatile Solids Calculations ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment: Reduction was demonstrated by Fecal Density Method SM 9221 E.
Treatment
Yes No NA NE
Check all that apply
Aerobic Digestion
❑
Anaerobic Digestion
Alkaline Pasteurization (Class A)
❑
Alkaline Stabilization (Class B)
❑
Compost
❑
Drying Beds
❑
Other
❑
Comment:
Sampling Yes No NA NE
Describe sampling:
2 x 10 to the 6th power per gram of total solids MPN/g.
Is sampling adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sampling representative? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The laboratory analytical data indicates pathogens reduction is being adequately achieved.
Therefore, the sample is being considered to be representative based on sampling method and
lab results.
Page 4 of 4