Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0004563_BIMS Report_20200401Compliance Inspection Report Permit: WQ0004563 Effective: 02/01/20 Expiration: 12/31/24 Owner: City of Hickory SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: City of Hickory DCAR County: Catawba 3200 20th Ave SE Region: Mooresville Newton NC 28658 Contact Person: Paul Lee Spencer Title: Project Manager, ORC Phone: 828-465-1401 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: NC0024279 City of Conover - Southeast WWTP NC0081370 City of Claremont - McLin Creek WWTP NC0032662 City of Claremont - North WWTP NC0040797 City of Hickory - Henry Fork WWTP NC0020401 City of Hickory - Northeast WWTP NC0024252 City of Conover - Northeast WWTP NC0039594 Town of Maiden - Maiden WWTP NC0036196 City of Newton - Clark Creek WWTP NC0025542 City of Hickory - Catawba WWTP Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Entry Time 08:OOAM Primary Inspector: Edward Watson Secondary Inspector(s): Exit Time: 05:OOPM Phone: Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Permit Inspection Type: Distribution of Residual Solids (503) Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: Miscellaneous Questions Record Keeping Treatment Sampling Pathogen and Vector Attraction Storage (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 4 Permit: WQ0004563 Owner - Facility: City of Hickory Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: The values are present to be able to perform the calculation for PAN and SAR. SAR was not presented in the analytical data and the SAR formula was not presented in the AR. When MRO staff performed the calculation for SAR, the value for SAR was below 10. Future Annual Reports should include the completed calculation and value for SAR MRO staff were able to repeat the values provided in the analytical data presented in the for PAN. The MRO has included an attached which provides instruction of the Annual Report requirements. The PFRP data indicates the adequate reduction of pathogens has been achieved to the degree that qualifies the composed material to be considered to be a class "A" residual. Bulking agent records are also presented in the AR. Overall, the AR indicates the RCF is in compliance with the permit. Page 2 of 4 Permit: WQ0004563 Owner - Facility: City of Hickory Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Type Land Application Distribution and Marketing Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there any GW quality violations? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of current permit on -site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are current metals and nutrient analysis available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑ a. TCLP analysis? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. SSFA (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are PAN balances being maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are PAN balances within permit limits? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has land application equipment been calibrated? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are there pH records for the land application site? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place? ❑ ❑ ❑ Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are hauling records available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: This is an AR review. A site visit was not conducted during this review. Metals and TCLP analyses is presented in the AR. Both the TCLP and Metals appear to be within permit limits. PAN and SAR and the values for thsese parameters also appear to be within the permit limits. Documentation is provided by the RCF to persons recieiving the compost product. Hauling records are presented in the AR and the records appear to be complete. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Yes No NA NE a. Fecal coliform SM 9221 E (Class A or B) ❑ ❑ ❑ Class A, all test must be <1000 MPN/dry gram Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram ❑ Fecal coliform SM 9222 D (Class B only) ❑ ❑ E ❑ Page 3 of 4 Permit: WQ0004563 Owner - Facility: City of Hickory Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Inspection Type: Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine Geometric mean of 7 samples per monitoring period for class B<2.0*10E6 CFU/dry gram ❑ b. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class A) ❑ ❑ ❑ c. pH records for alkaline stabilization (Class B) ❑ ❑ ❑ Temperature corrected d. Salmonella (Class A, all test must be < 3MPN/4 gram day) ❑ ❑ ❑ e. Time/Temp on: ❑ ❑ ❑ Digester (MCRT) ❑ Compost Class A lime stabilization ❑ f. Volatile Solids Calculations ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ g. Bench -top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: PVAR is performed by time and temperature to achieve greatest reduction. The digestion is by Aerobic methods. Final reduction is through time and temperature via a tunnel reactor with continued reduction on the curing pad. The final product is a composted material. Treatment Yes No NA NE Check all that apply Aerobic Digestion ❑ Anaerobic Digestion ❑ Alkaline Pasteurization (Class A) ❑ Alkaline Stabilization (Class B) ❑ Compost Drying Beds ❑ Other ❑ Comment: Time on temperature records are presented in the AR. The records indicate that the material has achieved the required temperature for a period long enough to provide the required reductiol to be considered a class "A" bio-solid that can be disributed. Sampling Yes No NA NE Describe sampling: Continuous sampling performed during time in the tunnel reaction and the additional sampling performed while on the curing pad are presented in the AR. Is sampling adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is sampling representative? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The detailed documentation of the bi-monthly PFRP indicated that sampling is representative. Page 4 of 4