20200409 Ver 1_SAW-2008-00700_20200325

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2008-00700 County: New Hanover U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Castle Hayne
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Applicant: Salvation Army Agent: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mark Craddock Corey Novak
1424 Northeast Expressway 3805 Wrightsville Ave
Atlanta, GA, 30329 Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403

Size (acres) 25.57 Nearest Town Wilmington
Nearest Waterway Smith Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030007 Coordinates Latitude: 34.254681
Longitude: -77.908082

Location description: Property is located south of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway at the end of N 30th Street. Property
is a cleared area with two existing stormwater features onsite. Property is bordered by Kornegay Ave to the west, a
forested area to the east, and Spaulding Drive to the south.

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:

A. Preliminary Determination

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to
be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation
map dated MAP DATE. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory
mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD
will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary
jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this
preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including
wetlands at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We
recommend that you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not
be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a
delineation that can be verified by the Corps.

B. Approved Determination

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may
not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a
delineation that can be verified by the Corps.

The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated
11/8/2018. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion.
Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.

The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by
the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 2/20/2019. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are
subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date
of this notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in in Wilmington, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Rachel Capito at
(910)-251-4487 or [e-mail]
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the approved jurisdictional
determination form dated 2/20/2019.
D. Remarks: None.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)

This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 4/21/2019.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

Date of JD: 2/20/2019 Expiration Date: 2/20/2024

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Salvation Army, Mark Craddock File Number: SAW-2008-00700 Date: 2/20/2019
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403

If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Rachel Capito , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.

SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 2/20/2019

B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, PROJECT NAME, SAW-2008-00700

C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Property is located south of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway at the
end of N 30th Street. Property is a cleared area with two existing stormwater features onsite. Property is bordered by Kornegay Ave to the west, a
forested area to the east, and Spaulding Drive to the south.
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.254681 , Long. -77.908082
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Smith Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Cape Fear
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03030007
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD
form:

D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 2/20/2019
Field Determination. Date(s):

SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.

There are “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area.
[Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:

B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.

There are “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]

1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters 2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands

b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1.7311 linear feet, 8 wide, and/or 0.32 acres.
Wetlands: 3.46 acres.

c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):

2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3

1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally” (e.g.,
typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS

A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section
III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2 and Section
III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below .

1. TNW
Identify TNW: Smith Creek

Summarize rationale supporting determination: Smith Creek is a TNW of Cape Fear which is also a TNW.

2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”: Wetland A abuts Smith Creek. All other onsite wetlands are
connected to wetland A via culverts and wetland C is separated by a small berm.

B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):

This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent waters”
(RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland
that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round (perennial) flow, skip to
Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, skip to Section III.D.4.

A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA
regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively
permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a
significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.

If the waterbody 4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must consider
the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical
purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary,
or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for the tributary,
Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite and offsite. The
determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.

1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches

(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.

Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:

Identify flow route to TNW 5:

4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known:

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: Natural
Artificial (man-made). Explain:
Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:

Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.

Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands Concrete
Cobbles Gravel Muck
Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover:
Other. Explain:

Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %

(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:

Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
Dye (or other) test performed:

Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWM 6 (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris
changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation
shelving the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour
sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events
water staining abrupt change in plant community
other (list):
Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:

If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum;
fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings;
physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
tidal gauges
other (list):

(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):

6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the
OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow regime (e.g.,
flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:

2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:

(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:

Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
Dye (or other) test performed:

(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
Ecological connection. Explain:
Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:

(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.

(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed characteristics;
etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:

(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:

3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:

Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:

C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION

A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by
any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a
TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands,
has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations
when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the
tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not
appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its
adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a floodplain
is not solely determinative of significant nexus.

Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed
in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or
to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other
species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological
integrity of the TNW?

Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below:

1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:

2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, then go to Section III.D:

3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence
or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:

D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):

1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: 1,731 linear feet, 8 wide, Or 0.32 acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: 3.46 acres.

2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year) are jurisdictional.
Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet wide.
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:

3. Non-RPWs 8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:

8See Footnote # 3.

4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:

Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting
an RPW:

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this conclusion
is provided at Section III.C.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with
similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is
provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION
OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK
ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.

F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
“Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR).
Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):

9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review
consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors
(i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional judgment
(check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a
finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, wide.
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.

SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.

A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters’ study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5’ Castle Hayne
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: New Hanover County Soil Survey
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): NAPP 1998 & OneMap 2016
or Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

JD also sent to requestor
McKim & Creed
C/o Rick Moore
243 North Front Street
Wilmington, NC 28401
)' CMF
1
— — — — I �T—— — — T--T--T--T--T--T_—`--� ���
MARTIN L E
~ UTH R KING P KWY
/ N 184574.0104 j �y�
E 2329694.10?8 CREEKWOOD NORTH HOA 1 CR�EKWOO NORT,; SU13DIVISION
f •• O KER
, �
/ DB 3298 PG 587
1 1 1 ECTION16 I
~ SITE
NO2°04'53"W 1709-6]'
w y TO 3RD
_ � �, � OR Glis STREET
\\ I
S88°49'03" E
RBC
RI NC S P L��
NC GRID NAD83/2011 Ns PLACE Da
\ a
NC GRID NAD83/2011
z
F - - - - N 184704.10 j
RBC N/F
NC GRID NAD83/2011 SALVATION ARMY
E 2329958.21 I
A
N 185107.02 DB 6003 PG 1387 io Q
E 2329868.32
VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
MAP BY MIKE UNDERWOOD TITLED" ANN POWERS SMITH o
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
-
L
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP" DATED JANUARY 2002 N Q
OVERALL AREA: 1,114,003 SO. FT. 25.57 ACRES a
1- ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND IN U.S. SURVEY
l
WETLANDS AREA: 150,726 SO. FT. 3.46 ACRES
FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
I
2
2. BEARINGS BASED ON NC GRID NAD83/2011-
---
4 j
3. REFERENCES: AS SHOWN ON PLAT
§I I
2
4. SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT
SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP, TITLE EVIDENCE, OR
ANY AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE
_ a j i -•- --
— N
o
OTHER FACTS THAT
SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE.
cr Q m 1 I
lz
5. SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT
°0
U3 I I
582°40'10"E
EXAMINED OR CONSIDERED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO
STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF
UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS OR FACILITIES
jZ
THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACT.
HURST BRANCH _. _-
6. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
3805 WRIGHTSVILLE AVENUE, WILMINGTON, NC 28403 [phone].
T -
-T----_- I I.'
7. THE BOUNDARY LINES FOR THESE AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE AND
j
WERE NOT SURVEYED. THE SURVEYOR DOES NOT CERTIFY AS TO
I
-
N/F
THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF WETLAND CLASSIFICATIONS.
I
_
SMITH CREEK LAND LLC
DB 5471 PG 228
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
--
L--___
PIN# 3138-09-16-3652 'r
-
I, DOMINIQUE E MIGUEZ PLS L-4831, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT
r
WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY
I I
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
BOOK 5107 PAGE 2187); THAT THE BOUNDARY LINES NOT
I I
' DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 SURVEYED ARE INDICATED WITH DASHED LINES AS DRAWN FROM
OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE
INFORMATION IN PENDER COUNTY GIS; THAT THE RATIO OF
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN
PRECISION IS 1:10,000; THAT THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS
THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH
-�
OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A
CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600);
PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS
I DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE
REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WITNEJ MY�ORIGINAL, 51GaNAjµ LI�ENSE�UM E�' O SEAL THIS
J 8E
WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL.
_
REGULATORY OFFICIALTITLE
/Oat Ao�
LEGEND
MI E ICI
RBC REBAR AND CAP
SCE ACTION ID _
PROFE SIONA SU OR L-4831 `4\�' AP
$ f
-
L.AN
.
a a
CMF = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
N15I36276790 m
SCALE: 1" = 200' e3019033015' S5050
v �F�>J
#C5 = WETLAND FLAG
0=4
�4!Z-
= WETLANDS
0
o too zoo 4a❑
r :r L-48 3i =
_ —
El
s
WETLAND DELINEATION SURVEY
JOB NUMBER: 06618-0002
*' a
OF
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY CENTER
CAD NUMBER: vwl01-066180002
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
PLS: DEM
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TOTAL WETLAND ACREAGE: 3.46
PARTY CHIEF: JH
TELEPHONE: [phone]
CLIENT: SALVATION ARMY
CAD TECH: ACS
FAX: [phone]
FIELD BOOK/PAGE: W1722/52
NORTH CAROLINA FIRM LICENSE NUMBER: F-1222
CITY OF WILMINGTON, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING NUMBER: 2018-075
SEPTEMBER 27, 2018
SHEET NUMBER: 1 of 2

I I
I
E9
I + E10
E11
w I E12
S
og
i E13
0 o E1
i E15
U
k
I I A3
i f
A39
1
I A40
I
A41
I
A43 'A42
A45 A44
A46 1 f
P-E7
E6
E5
1E4
WETLAND "E"
9,703 SO. FT.
E3 0.22 ACRES
E2 S68114'25" --- A34
El
E1 f13 R36 A35
A37
+404 WETLANDS
WETLAND "A"
130,221 SO. FT.
2.S9 ACRES
I �.111111I111�1
5� CAR r�r
■■'
~ EA
r -48
' F44
IE
SCALE: 1" = 100' 11 t3 /is
0 50 100 200
D7
D 06 N/F
SALVATION ARMY
D5 DB 6003 PG 1387
09 PIN# 3128-12-95-9417
04 MAP BY MIKE UNDERWOOD TITLED" ANN POWERS SMITH
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP" DATED JANUARY 2002
D10 OVERALL AREA: 1,114,003 SO. FT. 25.57 ACRES
D3 WETLANDS AREA: 150,726 SO. FT 3.46 ACRES
D2
D11
WETLAND "D"
7,136 SO. FT.
33 0.16 ACRES D1 N65'16'09"W
A32 D12 7� 36.47'
37 A30 A28 /
7
HURST BRANCH
t8' WIDE JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
N/F
1,731 LINEAR FEET
SMITH CREEK LAND LLC
13850 SO FT
DB 5471 PG 228
0.32 ACRES
PIN# 3138-09-16-3652
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG #
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
FROM PL
S06°11'41'W
15.63'
186184.96
2330280.38
A2
S03052'05'W
36.96'
186169.42
2330278.69
A3
S09'4O'56'E
31.44'
186132.55
2330276.20
A4
S27°34'49W
45.23'
186101.56
S29°30'05'W
44.33'
186061.47
A6
S13'18'53'W
23.2T
18WP2.88
12133D281.49A5
A7
S03°51'35'E
22.9T
1860DO.24
AS
S50°19'50'E
29.9T
185977-32
A9
S08°75'46'W
48.10'
185958.19
233025798
A10
S14°4T36'W
32.25'
185910.59
2330251.06
A11
S34'09'16'W
32.58'
185879.41
2330242.87
Al2
S17'1B'25'E
24.88'
185852.45
2330224.58
A13
S08°04'58'E
30.48'
185828.89
2330231.98
A14
S45°23'19%V
1 24.50'
185798.52
1 2330238.26
A15
S02°OB'44"W
15.12'
185781.31
2330218.82
A16
S06°51'47'W
30.66'
185766.20
2330210.25
A17
S64'4T57E
17.56'
185735.76
2330214.59
A18
S07°2T00'E
21.95'
185728.28
2330230.48
A19
S03°20'SYW
35.2T
185706.52
2330233.33
A20
S01°10'4TW
34.24'
1W671.31
2330231.27
��
243 NORTH FRONT STREET
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28401
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA F1RM LICENSE NUMBER: F-1722
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG#
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
A21
813°06'35'W
28.60'
185637.08
2330230.56
A22
SD8'W'27W
22.41'
185609.22
2330224.08
A23
S13°0T43'W
51.34'
185587.06
2330220.74
A24
S06'39'59'E
34.50'
185537.06
23302D9.08
A25
SM59-12-W
69.34'
185502.79
2330213.08
A26
S24-52-34-W
67.83'
185433.97
2330204.65
A27
S09'39'41'W
38.10'
185372.43
2330176.12
A28
S20'29'59'E
48.10'
185334.88
2330169.72
A29
S07'19'23W
66.24'
185289.82
2330186.57
A30
S05'1T05'W
50.41'
185224.12
2330178.12
A31
S47°2T26'W
17.25'
185173.93
2330173.48
A32
S05'40'52"W
53.08'
185162.26
2330160.T7
A33
S13'21'38'E
48.76'
1851D9.44
2330155.52
A34
S33°32'45'E
1 37.13'
185062.00
2330166.78
A35
S03'09'31'E
88.00'
185031.05
2=187.30
A36
S23°42'53'E
57.28'
184943.18
2330192.15
A37
S72°29'02'E
44.22'
184890.74
2330215.19
A38
S60°06'25'E
58.79'
184877.43
2a30257.35
A39
S68°75'46'E
68.39'
184848.13
2330308.32
A40
S63°21'53'E
56.19'
184822.80
2330371.84
C7
C6
C5
WETLAND "C"
1.174 SO. FT.
S77'46'12"E Cl C4 0.03 ACRES
39.90, 1 ;�3
A23 A22 A17 - 6
A13 A'
i
�107.1U A14
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG#
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
A41
S35'33'26'E
61.21'
164797.61
2330422.07
A42
S00'23'10'W
49.85'
184747.82
2330457.67
A43
S42°OT27'E
46.30'
184697.97
2330457.33
A44
S00'1541'E
22.14'
184663.63
2330488.39
A45
S49'33'10'E
20.09'
184641.49
2330468.49
PL
S01'29'15'W
26.69'
184628.46
2330503.77
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
B1
N53°O6'38'E
21.20'
185978.66
2330197.98
B2
SBB°22'44'E
23.48'
1115950.15
2330174.54
B3
S71'31'46'E
19.40'
185986.29
2330156.14
94
S89'44'20"E
27.8T
185986.42
2330128.27
B5
I N85°1831-E
24.1T
1 185984.44
2=104.18
B6
S39°41'27W
20.53'
186000.24
2330117.30
87
ST7°59'56'W
43.20'
186009.23
2330159.55
B8
S81'17109"W
25.13'
1OW13.03
2330184.39
139
S51°3TO5'W
15AT
186022.45
2330196.28
B10
N30'59'34W
36.23'
195999.80
2330209.BB
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG#
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
Cl
N85'1 8'29'W
46.04'
185744.21
2330175.59
C2
N01'45'30'E
11.24'
185747.98
2330129.71
C3
N54'38'03'E
14.10'
185759.22
2330130.05
C4
NBB°10'08'E
26.40'
185767 38
2330141.55
C5
N80°36'48'E
19AS
1B5768.22
2330167.94
C6
S11'14'43"E
9.72'
1B5771.39
2330187.13
C7
S37°76'15'W
22.18'
185781.86
2330189.02
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG#
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
D1
S78°36'58'W
44.8T
185387.69
2330143.00
D2
N68°5T57'W
31.06'
185378.83
2330099.01
D3
S86°34'14'W
30.04'
185390.DO
2330070.03
D4
S39°41'S5'W
32.30'
1B53B8.20
2330040.04
D5
S76°29'46'W
20.1T
185363-35
2330019.41
D6
S68°26'17"W
31.59'
185359.33
2329999.65
D7
S37°13'50"E
35.79'
185347.72
2329970.26
DB
S80'49'12'E
38.99'
185319.22
2329991.92
D9
N54°28'57'E
34.29'
185313.00
2330030.40
D10
WWI
54.43'
185332.93
2330058.32
D11
N7"-P58"E
42.19'
185W2.75
2=109.00
D12
N15-39.03-W
26.15'
185362.51
2330150.05
WETLAND DELINEATION SURVEY
OF
SALVATION ARMY COMMUNITY CENTER
TOTAL WETLAND ACREAGE: 3.46
CLIENT: SALVATION ARMY
CITY OF WILMINGTON, NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SEPTEMBER 27, 2018
NC GRID NAD83/2011
B6
B5 B7
WETLAND "B"
B4 2,493 SO. FT.
B3 B8 0.06 ACRES
B2 B9
N54'50'17"W B10
2 B1
1 A8 yy A7 ----------
A 10 A6
A9
S08'18'55"W
39.54'
WETLAND FLAG TABLE
FLAG#
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
E7
N68°79'49W
23.94'
184880.31
2330189.06
E2
S66°2056'W
27.08'
184889.15
2330166.81
E3
S84°2333'W
41.96'
184888.37
2330139.74
E4
N72°36'28'W
48.39'
184884.27
2330097.98
E5
N62°5120'W
44.39'
184896.73
2330051.80
E6
N63°44'3B"W
25.13'
184904.26
2330007 75
E7
S25'12'41"W
39.49'
184915.37
2329965.22
ES
S76°OT30'E
53.94'
184879.64
2329968.40
E9
S67°29'52'E
25.34'
184566.71
2330020.76
E10
S72°34'43"E
29.42'
184857.01
2330044.17
E11
S83'OT24'E
21.30'
184848.20
2330072.25
E12
N74°04'01'E
39.86'
184845.65
2330093.39
E13
S33'32'10'E
33.86'
184856.59
2330131.72
E14
N80°4624'E
25.42'
184828.37
2330150.43
E15
N59°3T51'E
1 59.74'
184832.45
2330175.52
E16
N65-04-57-W
1 41.91'
184862.65
2330227.06
CAPITO.RACHEL.ANN. ,.'s'9" seoAP.m oo'v,b°o
1536276790 o.e o,90 zo,s°boaosoo 36,bsa
JOB NUMBER:
SCALE:
CAD NUMBER:
PLS:
PARTY CHIEF:
CAD TECH:
FIELD BOOK/PAGE:
DRAWING NUMBER:
SHEET NUMBER:
05618-0002
1 " = 100,
17w 101-066180002
❑EM
JH
ACS
W1722�2
�1..1 f -rl,r,
2 OF 2

dp2-up
dp1-up
dp2-wet
dp1-wet
e5 e1
d5
c7 c5
c1
b5 b1
a5
a1
a47
a40
e16e10
a35
a30
d12
a25
a20
a15
a10
b10
Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
015030075Feet
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Figure 7
Preliminary Upland/Wetland
Delineation Sketch
Salvation Army Com. Center
New Hanover County, NC
Map Date: 11-08-18
LMG # LMG18.333
L:\Wetlands\2018\LMG18.333\MapsBoundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 2016 NC OneMap Aerial Photography
This is not a survey. All boundaries and distances are considered
approximate. This represents a preliminary sketch prepared from
field notes. A survey of delineated areas and review and approval
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is recommended prior to
specific site planning.
¯
Legend
R Data Points
Project area = 25.57 ac
Uplands ~21.3 ac (83%)
Wetlands = 3.46 ac (14%)
Non-jurisdictional stormwater basins ~0.8 ac (3%)
Perennial stream = 1,731 l.f.