20200330 Ver 1_NCDNR Stream impact response 3 25 20_20200325

SYnF.
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
(-- Yes C No
ID#* Version*
20200330
Is this project a public transportation project?* C Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Select Reviewing Office:* Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
C
Yes
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r
New Project
r
New Project w Existing ID
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: David Michaels
Vft is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20200330 1
20170001(no dashes)
Project Name: Willard Place Subdivision
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Guilford
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Oickthe upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NCDNR Stream impact response 3 25 20.pdf 149.93KB
Only pdf or Iv17 files are accepted.

Describe the attachments:
Written response to request for more information
Sign and Submit
P By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: 3/25/2020
Is filled in &Aonatically.

Ai`�►l►�
March 25, 2010
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality
Via: https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/Forms/Supplemental-Information-Form
RE: DWR#20200330
Dear Ms. Homewood,
In response to your request for additional information for the proposed Williard Place
subdivision we offer the following comments:
1. The impact to the stream has been minimized as follows:
a. Protected stream buffers will be established along the sides of this channel, 50' each
side or 100' total width.
b. The stream buffers will not be placed in ownership by each individual lot purchaser.
Instead ownership will be placed under the collective control of the homeowners'
association. This will insure proper long-term maintenance and viability of the
stream buffer. It will also reduce the potential for unauthorized encroachments or
other impacts to the stream buffers such as clearing, grading, fences, structures and
the like.
c. Total stream impact is limited to approximately 82 LF because the bubble of the cul-
de-sac was moved southward to the property line rather than being centered over
the stream.
2. The stream crossing is unavoidable for the following reasons:
a. There are approximately 1.2 acres of useable land south of the intermittent stream
and outside of the stream buffer that is otherwise inaccessible from the remainder
of the site unless a crossing is added.
b. We are setting aside 0.27 acres of that acreage as common area but including the
five (5) building lots and the cul-de-sac on the remainder.
Windsor Investments
PO Box 9147 • Greensboro, NC 27429
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]

c. The value of the five (5) lots exceeds the cost of constructing the road across the
stream, consequently it makes economic sense to build the road crossing.
d. Housing is in extremely high demand in this location of north High Point. We are
adding density to the overall site plan by creating these five additional lots. Most
municipalities encourage higher density in urban areas with available water and
sewer capacity as a method to combat sprawl.
e. The economic viability of the project would be jeopardized by the loss of these five
(5) lots given the high cost of the land and development costs associated with this
desirable location.
I hope this explanation proves satisfactory and will enable review of our application to
continue. If not please contact me with any further requests.
Yours truly,
David Michaels
Manager, Land Acquisition and Development
[e-mail]
336-207-8003
CC: Michael Brame, Pilot Environmental via email