Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140923 Ver 2_No Archaeological Survey Required PA 19-11-0013_20200324Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 ;oa NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM - This form & only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not lam' o o ,fo valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the � Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. f�- PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: R-5605 Extension County: Transylvania WBS No: 13587.1.1 Document: EA F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE Project Description: The project calls for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of US 641276 (Asheville Highway) and the corridor for the Davidson River Village Connector (TIP R-5605) in Transylvania County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as extending approximately 625 feet (190.50 m) northeast and 450 feet (137.16 m) southwest along US 641276 from the intersection and approximately 815 feet (248.41 m) east along the corridor for the connector. The APE is generally 200 feet (60.96 m) wide extending 100 feet (30.48 m) on either side from the centerline except at the proposed roundabout. At this location. the APE extends slightly further northwest from the center of the proposed roundabout to approximately 190 feet (57.91 m). In all, the APE encompasses approximately 8.5 acres. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: The US 64/276 and Davidson River Village Connector roundabout project (R-5605 Extension) is located on the north side of Brevard in Transylvania County, North Carolina. It is plotted in the southern half of the Pisgah Forest USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). A site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on November 25, 2019. Although no known sites are reported within the APE, 23 previously recorded sites (31TV3, 31TV11, 31TV16, 31TV28, 31TV43, 31TV44, 31TV132, 31TV286, 31TV405, 31TV533, 31TV535, 31TV536, 31TV573, 31TV583, 31TV665, 31TV667, 31TV701, 31TV758, 31TV828, 31TV831, 31TV833, 31 TV 1085, and 31 TV 1086) are within a mile exhibiting a high density of known archaeological resources for the region. According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2019), there are no known historic architectural resources within the APE that will yield intact archaeological deposits that may be considered significant. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), historic maps (North Carolina maps website), and Google Street View application were also examined for information on environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance. The project corridor runs northeast to southwest with tributaries to the Davidson River north and south of the proposed roundabout (Figures 2). These tributaries have been modified by property owners and during past road/utility construction projects. Portions of the channels have been buried, straighten, and/or relocated. This has greatly affected the natural characteristics of the surrounding landforms. The project area is situated generally along low stream terraces with hillsides to the northwest of US 64/276. Hillsides and a southern ridge nose have been cut by construction of US 64/276. A floodplain adjacent to the northern tributary has been partially fill-in if not entirely by urban development. Overall, "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 development is high with commercial properties in the north and residential properties in the south. Disturbance is heavy from past earth moving activities associated with road construction, utilities, and development. The corridor for the Davidson River Village Connector is nearly complete and has impacted the entire corridor to the east and a section of property northwest of the proposed roundabout and US 64/276. It does not appear that any intact soils remain within the project area. The USDA soil survey map for Transylvania County shows the project area covered by Evard loam (ChD), Dillard loam (DeB); Fannin fine sandy loam (FaE), the Brasstown-Junaluska complex (FfE), Tate fine sandy loam (TaD), and Toxaway loam (Tn) (see Figure 2) (USDA NRCS 2019). The Tate, Dillard, and Evard series encompass most of the project area and comprises the stream terraces. These soils are moderate to well drained with a slope of 1 to 15 percent. They have the potential for archaeological sites if ground disturbance is low; however, this does not appear to be the case within the current project area were disturbance is high. The adjacent hillsides are made up of either the Fannin or Brasstown-Junaluska complex soils. Although well drained, they are steeply sloped at over 15 percent. Finally, the floodplain is composed of Toxaway loam, which is very poorly drained. Significant archaeological resources are not expected on wet or steeply sloped soils, and do not required any subsurface testing. A review of the site files shows a high density of known archaeological resources in the region with 23 sites within a mile of the proposed project. Most of which were reported by Patricia Holden (1966) and Ruth Wetmore (1991, 1993) during their archaeological surveys for Transylvania County. Further work for the US Forest Service (Alford 2005; Burchett and Ashcraft 1994; Burchett and Noel 1994; Hall 1996; Noel 2004; Shumate et al. 2001; Wilson 1978), NCDOT (Jones 2018; Raszick 2019), and local development projects (Southerland and Trinkley 2003) have contributed additional archaeological information for the surrounding region. Many of the sites have yet to be assessed for the National Register (NRHP), but at least two (31TV286 and 31TV1085) have been determined eligible for the NRHP. Both sites are in locations have seen little development activity, unlike the current APE. A portion of the project area was also reviewed as part of a background study and reconnaissance for the originally proposed Davidson River Village project by TRC (Benyshek 2014). Although the background study states that most of the Davidson River Village project area is disturbed, it does indicate on Figure 12 that a portion of the current R-5605 Extension project area may contain intact soils (Figure 3). This recommendation was made prior to the construction of the Davidson River Village Connector and reflects properties at a greater distance away from US 64/276 and its associated development. It is very unlikely due to the project setting that similar known archaeological sites in the region will be encountered within the currently defined APE. A historic map review was also carried out, but most early maps prior to the 20th century provide few details concerning the project area. The USGS maps are some of the first in which the project location could be determine. The 1905 Pisgah topographic maps depict an early road that partially follows an alignment similar for US 64/276 (Figure 4). The two tributaries have yet to be altered, and a house is located just north of the southern waterway and road. This area has been recently disturbed by roadway construction. However, the house site shown on the map may be slight further north at the location of a current house outside of the defined APE. Later USGS maps (Pisgah 1935, 1945, and 1946) show an increase in residential development with several structures plotted northwest of the road. Regardless, it seems likely that these structures are typical for the region and will not provide any new or significant information. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 2of9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: The proposed US 64/276 and Davidson River Village Connector roundabout project (R-5605 Extension) project in Transylvania County is not likely to impact any significant archaeological resources. The steep hillsides and wet soils in the floodplain are not suitable for early habitation, while the terrace is occupied by modern development associated with past road and utility construction including alterations to the current tributaries. No additional archaeological work is recommended for this project. But if design plans change to affect subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultation will be necessary. Please note, this project falls within a North Carolina County in which the Catawba Nation, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, the Cherokee Nation, the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians, and the Muscogee Creek Nation have expressed an interest. It is recommended that you contact each federal agency involved with this project to determine their Section 106 Tribal consultation requirements. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other: FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED z- 12/2/19 C. Damon Jones NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 REFERENCES CITED Alford, Paul 2005 Reevaluation of 31 TV76: The Davidson River Site, Transylvania County, North Carolina. US Forest Service. Benyshek, Tasha 2014 Letter Report, Archaeological Background Research and Reconnaissance of Davidson River Village, Transylvania County, North Carolina. TRC Environmental Corporation, Asheville, North Carolina. Submitted to Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc., Hendersonville, North Carolina. Burchett, Alan H. and A. Scott Ashcraft 1994 The Heritage Resources Survey for the Proposed Schenck Timber Sale, Compartment 79, Pisgah Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Transylvania County, North Carolina. National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville. Burchett, Alan H. and Robert O. Noel 1994 The Heritage Resources Survey for the Proposed Davidson River Salvage Timber Sale, Compartments 65 and 79, Pisgah Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Transylvania County, North Carolina. National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville. Hall, Linda 1996 Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Drip Irrigation System at the Pisgah Center for Wildlife Education, Compartment 76, Pisgah Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Transylvania County, North Carolina. High Country Archaeological Services, Weaverville, North Carolina. Submitted to National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville. Holden, Patricia P. 1966 An Archaeological Survey of Transylvania County, North Carolina. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill HPOWEB 2019 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Web Service. http:HgisNCDCR.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed November 26, 2019. Jones, C. Damon 2018 No National Register Of historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Affected Form, PA 17-05-0033, R-5799, Transylvania County, North Carolina. In Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects Annual Report for FY 2018-2019, Multi County. Submitted to North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh. Noel, Robert O. 2004 Heritage Resources Survey for the Proposed Sycamore Flats Rehabilitation Project (P79-1), Compartment 79, Pisgah Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Transylvania County, North Carolina. National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville. Raszick, Tiffany 2019 Archaeological Adverse Effect Determination, PA 18-07-0032, EB-5858, Transylvania County, North Carolina. In Programmatic Agreement for Minor Transportation Projects Annual Report for FY 2018-2019, Multi County. Submitted to North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 4of9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 Shumate, M. Scott, Patti Evans -Shumate, and Larry R. Kimball 2001 Archaeological Testing at 31TV758 at the Schenck Job Corps Center, Pisgah National Forest, Transylvania County, North Carolina. Appalachian State University Laboratories of Archaeological Science, Department of Anthropology, Boone, North Carolina. Submitted to National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville. Southerland, Nicole, and Michael Trinkley 2003 Cultural Resources Survey of Two Tracts in Brevard, Transylvania County, North Carolina. Chicora Foundation, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Services (USDA NRCS) 2019 Transylvania County Soil Survey. Available online at http://webosilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/. Accessed November 26, 2019. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1905 Pisgah, North Carolina -South Carolina, 30-minute quadrangle map. 1935 Pisgah Forest, North Carolina, 7.5-minute quadrangle map. 1945 Pisgah Forest, North Carolina, 7.5-minute quadrangle map. 1946 Pisgah Forest, North Carolina 7.5-minute quadrangle map. 2016 Pisgah Forest, North Carolina 7.5-minute quadrangle map. Wetmore, Ruth Y. 1991 Archaeological Survey of Tract for Proposed Brevard Care Center, Brevard, Transylvania County, North Carolina. Submitted to Pruitt Corporation, Toccoa, Georgia. 1993 An Archaeological Survey of Transylvania County, North Carolina. Sponsored by the Transylvania County Historic Properties Commission. North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Department of Cultural Resources, Raleigh. Wilson, Jack H. Jr. 1978 Archaeological Sites On and Near National Forest Land in North Carolina. United States Forest Service, Asheville, North Carolina. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED " form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 5 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 One Mile Radius (Shaded) �4 Around Project Area van, ' , . v f � � R-5605 Extension APE (Red) .F7 el IdIraton rFWe 'pf io t re rci�����{`' �' a amaCon ,,,rt 104 MAT' Pisgah Fog, 4 . `► 0 5.000 N Feet Vt+ u 2,000 Transyiaarria Count Meters Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Pisgah Forest (2016), NC USGS T5 Topographic Quadrangle. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED " form.for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Ag, cc: ocnr. 6 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 1~igure ?. Aerial photograph of the APG showing landforms, soils, and development. Ao ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED " form.for the Amended Manor Transportation Projects as Qualified in dw 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 7 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 Figure 3. Aerial Image from the background study and reconnaissance for the proposed Davidson River Village project carried out by TRC showing that the current project area. "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED " form.for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 8 of 9 Project Tracking No.: 19-11-0013 _ f C, 1. Project Area s, Figure 4. The 1905 USGS Pisgah topographic map showing the location of the project area. il "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURYEYREQUlkED " form.for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 9 of 9