310688_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200226

QVDivision of Water Resources S
Facility Number 0 - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
for Visit: (YRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - - oaJ Arrival Time: Departure Time:County: Region: IAjIRO
Farm Name: S}QeAS Arm. J�\C. Owner Email:
Owner Name: STeQJ'. 'F^ry' -fnt✓ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
OnsiteRepresentative: rar�lshn S�ced$
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish erc)
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: sm;t6V.,eldS oLwd l,&ow4.
r
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
/o
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) U Yes U❑ ❑ o Li NA U NE
❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes NA NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: '� Date of Inspection: O,Qo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): � p , u{
Observed Freeboard (in): ap,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes2-fro ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S (7'e�+
13. Soil Type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
52No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ik<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[s�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
E2�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�`V
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Eg/No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 6
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: S 2'a d
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes Er/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[:]Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
V❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
WdS1c on WQeJ ClN ro-k j�.r. S6-0 I;ielclf
P' d hs+ eurf / t 7te1 S k,.J 1-t5 UR-5 W*k W drvnS
We2fcly rytprfa� �y 13tards �t du�r CVwr�l �vr irr'Li vr�
—Tfv); v- okc, Cad d+rr;i�?
Reviewer/Inspector Name: :10 I P6a.a y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: MW 01-9514
Date:
21412015