20051877 Ver 1_Year 8 Monitoring Report_2019_20200319

ID#* 20051877 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Initial Review Completed Date 03/19/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/19/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Matthew Reid
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20051877
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Dye Branch II
Iredell
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: DyeBranchll_92255_MY8_2019.pdf 25.08MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

Dye Branch II
Stream Restoration
MY8 Monitoring Report (2019)
NCDMS Project Number: 92255
Submitted to
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
March 2020
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

March 5, 2020
Matthew Reid
Western Project Manager
NCDENR – Division of Mitigation Services 5
Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone] Mobile
[e-mail]
Re: Monitoring Year 8 Draft Report for the Dye Branch II Stream Restoration Site Yadkin River Basin – CU# 03040105–Iredell County EEP Project ID No. 92255 Monitoring Contract # 004523 Dear Mr. Reid, I have outlined our responses to the comments on the Draft Monitoring Year 8 report for the Dye Branch II Stream Restoration Site in (Red).
Executive Summary:
•Please revise sentence regarding treatments since 2015 to read nine instead of seven toaccount for the 2019 invasive work. Updated to nine recorded treatments.
•Please revise the sentence referencing June and September of 2018 (MY7) invasive treatmentand replace with the following 2019 dates: July and September of 2019 (MY8). Revised sentence.
Table 2:
•Please add the following invasive treatment dates to the table: June 2018, September 2018,July 2019 and September 2019. Table 2 edited.
CCPV
•The CCPV invasive polygon has not been updated since MY5. A contractor has spent aconsiderable amount of time on the site treating invasives to meet a threshold that will beacceptable for regulatory closure. While there may still be some invasives present, thispolygon does not represent the current site conditions based on DMS site inspections of thecontractor’s work. DMS will continue treating the site through regulatory close out. Pleaseupdate the invasive polygon to reflect current site conditions. CCPV updated to reflect MY8treatments.
Appendix A
•Footers in Appendix A reference MY7 Please update to MY8 and QA/QC document for other
occurrences. Reviewed and edited where applicable.
Appendix C
•The photo description for Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 is highlighted green in the draft hardcopy. Please correct for final. Revised photo highlight
Appendix F:
•Please include the attached invasive species treatment logs in Appendix F. Attached to App F
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmental.com
Digital Deliverable File Review:
DMS is conducting digital file audits on all projects. Below are missing or incomplete digital
deliverables for the project. If you have any questions or need clarification regarding these items,
please contact Greg Melia.
•CVS file provided is missing observation/survey dates for certain plots, and in otherplots x y coordinates exceed the bounds of the selected plot dimensions. Pleaseresolve these errors and resubmit so DMS can enter these data into our database.Observation/survey dates added. Plot dimensions reformatted so that x,y coordinatesare within bounds.
•Although it is indicated that bank height ratio (BHR) was calculated using a fixedbankfull area, it appears that the MY8 bankfull elevation was used as opposed to usingthe bankfull elevation that achieves the fixed as built bankfull cross sectional area.For example, the BHR for XS 4 using the method outlined in the Technical WorkgroupMemorandum should be equal to 0.83, with a low bank height elevation of 824.5 anda bankfull elevation of 824.997, which produces the as built bankfull cross sectionalarea of 32.5. Please ensure that calculations are done using the bankfull elevation thatachieves the fixed as-built bankfull cross sectional area.The bankfull elevation that achieves the fixed as-built bankfull cross-sectional areawas used for all cross-sections except XS5 and XS9. The stream in the area of thesecross-sections was reconstructed during MY6. For cross-sections XS5 and XS9, thebankfull elevation that achieves the fixed Post-Repair MY6 bankfull cross-sectionalarea.
•DMS does not have any spatial features for Dye Branch II. As-built features are notproperly segmented, or are continuous points and cannot be converted into lines,while prior geodatabases containing monitoring features and stream thalwegs arecompromised and no longer contain features that can be rendered in arcmap. Pleaseprovide features that characterize the creditable assets that have been reported forDye Branch II, ensuring that features are segmented and attributed as they are in theasset table and that feature lengths match the linear feet reported. Also please includethe monitoring features for this project (i.e. cross sections, crest gage locations, vegplots). Geodatabase updated to include thalweg and monitoring features.
Sincerely,
Danvey Walsh
Environmental Scientist
Monitoring Firm
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone]
Project Contact: Danvey Walsh
Email: [e-mail]
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Dye Branch II Equinox
Project No. 92255 March 2020
MY8 Monitoring Report
Dye Branch II Stream Restoration
2019 MY8 Monitoring Report
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract Page 1
2.0 Methodology Page 3
3.0 References Page 3
Dye Branch II Equinox
Project No. 92255 March 2020
MY8 Monitoring Report
Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1a. Project Components
Table 1b. Component Summations
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross-Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 11a. Monitoring Data – Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters – Cross-Sections)
Table 11b. Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Appendix F. Invasive Species Treatment Logs
Dye Branch II 1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 March 2020
MY8 Monitoring Report
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as
follows:
•Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while
maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed’s
water and sediment load;
•Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste
inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass-wasting, and stormwater runoff
through stabilization of the stream channel and creation of a stormwater wetland; and
•Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through
establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species.
This is the third monitoring report for the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project since the
completion of Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) in 2015. A MY6 Post-Repair Monitoring Report was
completed in February 2018 that documented the repairs and plantings completed in 2017. As a
part of the repairs, two small areas were repaired on Upper Dye Branch and five small areas were
repaired on Lower Dye Branch. The repairs consisted of repairing failed structures, installation
of brush toes, streambank grading, installation of coir matting, riffle construction, and grading of
the channel to reestablish the thalweg for proper flow through the new alignment. A
supplemental planting was also performed to revegetate the areas that were graded during the
repairs. A temporary seed mix and 420 bare root seedlings were planted in areas affected by the
repairs to help revegetate.
This report incorporates data associated with MY8 monitoring and includes a qualitative
vegetation and stream assessment consisting of vegetation monitoring of seven (7) annual
monitoring plots, four (4) random/temporary vegetation plots, morphological monitoring of ten
(10) cross-sections, and hydrologic monitoring. This report also includes a visual assessment
which incorporates multiple photo points, visual assessment of the vegetation, easement, and
stream channel to document any problem areas that arise. These problem areas are documented
in Tables 5 and 6 and depicted in Figure 2, the Current Condition Plan View. This is the final
monitoring report for the Dye Branch project with closeout activities planned in 2020.
Vegetation monitoring of the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project includes annual monitoring
of seven permanent vegetation plots, four temporary vegetation plots, and visual assessment of
the easement as a whole. Planted stems range from 3 to 23 per plot with 7 to 49 stems observed
when volunteers are included. Based on the MY8 vegetation data, the average stem density for
planted stems across all plots is approximately 364 stems per acre. This meets the year 8 success
criteria of 210 planted stems per acre. When all planted and natural stems are combined, the
average stem density is 977 stems per acre, which also meets the success criteria. Four random
vegetation plot transects were also performed to evaluate stems throughout the easement as a
whole. The stem counts for the random vegetation transects were 10, 20, 26, and 18 which
extrapolate out to 500, 1000, 1300, and 900 stems per acre respectively.
Dye Branch II 2 Equinox
Project No. 92255 March 2020
MY8 Monitoring Report
Regarding invasive-exotics, a contractor was hired to treat the invasive-exotic vegetation in
November 2015. Since 2015 nine treatments have occurred at the Dye Branch site. Treatments
occurred in July and September of 2019 (MY8) and have been effective. Recent treatments
consisted of cut and stump sprays of a 50% glyphosate solution targeting Callery pear, (Pyrus
calleryana), kudzu (Pueraria montana), privet (Ligustrum spp.), and multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora), mist blower treatments sprays of 2% clopyralid solution targeting kudzu and
lespedeza (Lespedeza spp.), basal bark in a 15% solution with diesel fuel targeting kudzu, privet,
and multiflora rose, and foliar backpack spray of a 3% glyphosate solution targeting kudzu and
privet, multiflora rose. While treatments have been effective, populations of invasive-exotics of
lesser concern, specifically Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), still persist in areas
throughout the easement. Invasive-exotics will be monitored during future site visits and
invasive-exotic treatments will continue until project closeout in 2020. Visual assessment of
the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks,
structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. A few areas of bank erosion were noted on all
reaches in 2019 (Figure 2, CCPV). All of the implemented repairs completed in late 2017 are
intact and performing as designed. Photos of stream problem areas can be seen in the digital
submission.
MY8 morphologic monitoring of the Dye Branch Site included ten (10) cross-sections. Cross-
sectional overlays are located in Appendix D and a summary of the data is located in Table 11a
and 11b. Cross-sections remained relatively stable between the Post-Construction data and MY8
monitoring. Cross-section 5 continues to undergo change, as it has taken on a riffle-like
geometry. Cross-sections 7 and 8, which were noted as aggrading in the MY7 report, appear to
be trending back to their as-built geometry. Riffle dimensions for the three different reaches also
remained relatively stable during MY8. Dimensional changes for Cemetery Branch were a
decrease in the bankfull width by 0.3 foot and lowering of the width/ depth ratio by 0.3. Dye
Branch Upstream exhibits little dimensional change from MY7, Dye Branch Downstream
underwent an increase in bankfull width of 0.3 feet and the width/ depth ratio also increased by
0.3.
A water level logger was installed in December of 2010 and has since recorded a total of 14
bankfull events. An equipment malfunction led to the loss of pressure transducer between MY5
(2015) and Post-Repair Monitoring (2018). A crest gauge was installed in February 2018 to
monitor for evidence of bankfull events. Wrack lines well above the bankfull elevation were
observed on Dye Branch Upstream, at Station 3+00, during a site visit on May 31st, 2018. While
the crest gauge did not have a reading above bankfull during this visit, consistent wrack lines
throughout the project area indicate a bankfull event occurred. Cross-referenced with gauge data
from NCCRONOS, the suspected date was 4/24/2018. Wrack lines observed on January 25th,
2019 indicated an additional bankfull event. This was at least the sixteenth bankfull event since
the project completion.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
Dye Branch II 3 Equinox
Project No. 92255 March 2020
MY8 Monitoring Report
restoration plan documents available on the NCDMS website. All raw data supporting tables
and figures in the appendices are available from NCDMS upon request.
2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in Post-Repair Monitoring replicate those
employed during the previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and
procedures documents (Rosgen 1996; USACE 2003).
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-sections were collected in the field
and geo-referenced (NAD83 North Carolina State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Geomorphic data
included 10 cross-sections.
Vegetation monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of composition and density of planted
species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each
plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot taken from the origin each
monitoring year.
3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Rocky Mountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2005. Dye Branch Stream
Restoration Plan. Raleigh.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books. Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources-Division of Water Quality. Wilmington District.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Project
Component or
Reach ID
Existing
Feet/Acres
Restoration
Level Approach
Footage
or
Acreage
Stationing Buffer
Acres BMP Elements Comment
Cemetery Branch 968 lf R P3 1,014 lf 0+00 - 10+14 Stormwater wetlands
Dye Branch
Upstream 1,772 lf R P2 1,500 lf 0+00 - 15+00 Stormwater wetlands
Dye Branch
Downstream 1,232 lf R P2 1,171 lf 16+00 - 27+71
- Information unavailable
=Non-Applicable
Table 1a. Project Components
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Restoration
Level
Stream
(lf)
Non-
Riparian
(ac)
Upland
(ac)
Buffer
(ac)BMP
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 3,685 0.0 0.0
Enhancement 0.0 0.0
Enhancement I 0
Enhancement II 0
Creation 0.0 0.0
Preservation 0 0.0 0.0
HQ Preservation 0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
Totals 3,685 0 0 0 3
=Non-applicable
0
Table 1b. Component Summations
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Riparian Wetland (ac)
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan -Oct 2005
Final Design - Construction Plans -April 2006
Final Design - Repair Plans -July 2010
Construction Repairs -Dec 2010
Temporary S&E mix applied -Summer 2010
Permanent seed mix applied -Summer 2010
Planting -Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As-built (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)Mar 2011 Aug 2011
Year 1 Monitoring Nov 2011 Jan 2012
Year 2 Monitoring Dec 2012 Jan 2013
Year 3 Monitoring Nov 2013 Dec 2013
Year 4 Monitoring Dec 2014 Dec 2014
Year 5 Monitoring Nov 2015 Nov 2015
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Nov 2015
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Mar 2017
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Apr 2017
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -July 2017
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Aug 2017
2017 Repair - Stream -Nov 2017
2017 Repair - Planting -Feb 2018
Year 6 Monitoring - Post Repair Feb 2018 Feb 2018
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -June 2018
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Sep 2018
Year 7 Monitoring Oct 2018 Nov 2018
Year 8 Monitoring Jul 2019 Nov 2019
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Jul 2019
Invasive-Exotic Vegetation Treatment -Sep 2019
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Designer Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC, 27518
Primary Project Design POC Emmett Perdue [phone]
Construction Contractor Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Repair Construction/ Planting Contractor Baker Grading
2018 970 Bat Cave Rd
Old Fort, NC 28762
Repair Construction Contractor POC Charles Baker [phone]
Planting Contractor Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seeding Contractor Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seed Mix Sources Hanes Geo Components
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Nursery Stock Suppliers North Carolina Forest Service
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (MY0-MY8) Equinox Environmental
2010 - 2015, 2017 - 2019 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh [phone]
Post-Repair Monitoring Performers (MY6)Equinox Environmental
2017 37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Danvey Walsh [phone]
Table 3. Project Contacts
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
--
--
13-17-2
C
Yes
Poor Bioclassification
Yes
No
C
No
--
Urban
--
0.0097 / 0.0125 0.0217
-
Depth
0.06
First / Second First
2,671 1,014
N/A
E4 / G4c E4
C
-
None
--
--
N/A
Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax
12.0
8.9
12.0
85%
15%
Warm
100%
No
Restoration Component Attributes
Cemetery BranchDye Branch
Piedmont
Southern Outer Piedmont
Yadkin - Pee Dee
03040105010010
03-07-11
Upper Rocky River Local Watershed Plan
Clay%
K
T
Valley Toe Slope Range
Cowardin Classification
Trout Waters Designation
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc.
Series
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
-
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
Rosgen Classification of Pre-Existing
Rosgen Classification of As-Built
Valley Type
Valley Slope
Valley Side Slope Range
NCDWQ AU/Index Number
NCDWQ Classification
303d Listed
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
Total Acreage of Easement
Watershed Impervious Cover
Drainage Area (sq.mi.)
Stream Order
Restored Length (feet)
Perennial or Intermittent
Watershed Type
Watershed LULC Distribution
Perennial Perennial
0.60
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
Project County
Physiographic Region
Ecoregion
Other
River Basin
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
WRC Class
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
Urban
Table 4. Project Attributes
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Iredell
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
USGS HUC
NCDWQ Sub-Basin

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
^_^_
^_^_^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
+U
GF
GF
GFGF
3
2
4
5
1
8
6
7 4
3
2
1
PP1
PP2
PP3
PP4
PP5PP6PP7
PP8PP9
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Prepared byPrepared for
Project NumberMarch 2020 ®0 500250
Feet
NCDMS # 92255
Dye Branch Stream RestorationMonitoring Year 8 - Integrated Current Condition Plan ViewIredell County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 1
Project:Notes:1) Base Map Data Provided by Mulkey Engineers & Consultants2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo3)Areas of Lonicera japonica also on site
Legend
Cross Sections
Easement Boundary
Roads
As-Built Centerline
McLelland AvenueCa
rb
a
r
ru
s
Av
enu
e
Ch
u
r
c
h

S
t
r
e
e
t
Cemetery BranchDye Branch UpstreamDye Branch Downstream
Catawba Avenue
XS-1
XS-3
XS-2
XS-4
XS-5
XS-6
XS-7
XS-8
XS-9XS-10
0+
0
0
1+
0
0
2+
0
0
3+
0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
10+000+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+
0
011+0012
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
1
4+
0
0
1
5+
0
0
16+001
7+
0
0
18+
0
019+0020+0021+0022+002
3
+
0
0
2
4
+
0
025+0026+0027+00As-Built Top of Bank
1+
0
0
0+
0
0
Post-Repair Conditions
In-Stream Structure Condition
Failed
Failed Log Sill
Stressed
Stressed Rock SillBank / Bed Condition
Bed AggradationBank Scoured / Eroding
Mass Wasting
Bed Degradation
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Impacted - No Data Collected
+U Crest Gauge
Control Points#0
Photo Points^_
Root Wad
Log Sill
Cross Vane
Rock Vane
Rock Sill
GF Temporary Vegetation Plot Origin
Vegetation Problem Areas
Invasives - Present
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data

0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 14 14 100%
15 15 100%
15 15 100%
15 15 100%
14 14 100%
1. Scoured / Eroding 1 12 99%0 0 0%
2. Undercut 0 0 100%0 0 0%
3. Mass Wasting 0 0 100%0 0 0%
Totals 1 12 99%0 0 0%
1. Overall Integrity 32 32 100%
2. Grade Control 28 28 100%
2a. Piping 28 28 100%
3. Bank Protection 4 4 100%
4. Habitat 13 13 100%
2. Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
3. Engineered
Structures Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth Ratio ≥ 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
base-flow.
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6).
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch
Assessed Length 1,014 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 17 17 100%
20 20 100%
16 20 80%
17 17 100%
16 16 100%
1. S coured / Eroding 6 152 95% 0 0 95%
2.Undercut 0 0 100%N/A N/A N/A
3. Mass Wasting 0 0 100% 0 0 100%
Totals 6 152 95% 0 0 95%
1. O verall Integrity 29 30 97%
2. Grade Control 8 8 100%
2a. Piping 8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection 21 23 91%
4. Habitat 5 5 100%
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Upstream
Assessed Length 1,500 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth Ratio ≥ 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
base-flow.
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
1.Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1.Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6).
2.Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
2. Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
3. Engineered
Structures Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
1 34 97%
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 11 11 100%
10 10 100%
10 10 100%
10 10 100%
10 10 100%
1. S coured / Eroding 2 62 97% 0 0 0%
2.Undercut 0 0 100% 0 0 0%
3. Mass Wasting 0 0 100% 0 0 0%
Totals 2 62 97% 0 0 97%
1. O verall Integrity 21 22 95%
2. Grade Control 7 8 88%
2a. Piping 8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection 14 14 100%
4. Habitat 5 5 100%
2. Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing habitat.
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
3. Engineered
Structures Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth Ratio ≥ 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
base-flow.
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
1.Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1.Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6).
2.Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4. Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Downstream
Assessed Length 1,171 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Vegetation Category CCPV Depiction Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Stipple
Black Dots White Background 0 0.00 0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas N/A 0 0.00 0%
Totals 0 0.00 0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor N/A 0 0.00 0%
Cumulative Totals 0 0.00 0%
Easement Acreage 12.01
Vegetation Category CCPV Depiction Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Cross Hatch
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)2 0.22 2%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Stipple
Orange Dots White Background 0 0.00 0.0%Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Definitions
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY7
stem count criteria.
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
given the monitoring year.
Definitions
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Planted Acreage 9.0
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Cemetery Branch – Permanent Photo Station 1
Downstream
Cemetery Branch – Permanent Photo Station 2
Upstream
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data

Cemetery Branch – Permanent Photo Station 2
Downstream

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 3
Downstream

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 4
Upstream

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 5
Upstream

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 6
Upstream

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 7
Downstream

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 8
Upstream
Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 9
Upstream
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 10
Upstream Repair Area 6 STA 10+50 (Photo form 2018)

Dye Branch – Permanent Photo Station 11
Downstream Repair Area STA 19+00 (Photo from 2018)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1 No
57%
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 No
5 No
6 Yes
7 Yes
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
MY8 Monitoring – July 30th, 2019
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Report Prepared By Danvey Walsh
Date Prepared 10/22/2019 15:22:15 PM
Database name Equinox-2018-A-DyeBranch_MY6_2018.mdb
Database location Z:\ES\NRI&M\EEP Monitoring\Dye Branch\DB-MY8-2019\Data\Veg
Computer name FIELD-PC3
File size 46333952
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
Project Code 92255
project Name Dye Branch
Description
River Basin Yadkin-Pee Dee
Length(ft)
Stream-to-Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 7
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
PROJECT SUMMARY
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P-all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 6 1 1 1 1 1 1
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 1 8 8 8
Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub 2 2 2
Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon Tree 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 4 4 4 9 9 11
Juglans nigra Black Walnut Tree 1 1 1
Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana Eastern Redcedar Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tuliptree Tree 5 6 18 7
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera Tulip-tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood Tree 1 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum Tree 4 13
Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore Tree 1 2 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1
Quercus Oak Tree 2 2 2
Quercus nigra Water Oak Tree 1 1 3 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1 7 7 11 2 2 3 4
Quercus velutina Black Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 4 7 7 7 8 10 10 26 3 3 18 4 4 13 12 12 48 23 23 49
3 3 5 5 5 6 4 4 7 3 3 7 3 3 7 6 6 9 6 6 9
162 162 283 283 283 324 405 405 1052 121 121 728 162 162 526 486 486 1942 931 931 1983
1
size (ACRES)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1 1 1
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Stem count
size (ares)1 1 1
Table 9. Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Dye Branch
Current Plot Data (MY8 2019)
Scientific Name Common Name
Species
Type
VP1 VP2 VP3 VP4 VP5 VP6 VP7
Appendix C Vegetation Assessment Data
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo boxelder Tree 3 13 1
Acer negundo var. negundo boxelder Tree 7 7
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 2 2 8 11 11 16 13 13 16 4 2
Acer rubrum var. rubrum red maple Tree 5 5
Albizia julibrissin silktree Exotic 2
Betula nigra river birch Tree 9 9 10 3 3 6 3 3 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 3 3 6 1 1 1
Carya hickory Tree 7 9 4 5
Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree 1 1 1
Carya ovata shagbark hickory Tree 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 2 3
Cornus florida flowering dogwood Tree 1 4
Cornus kousa Kousa dogwood 6
Crataegus hawthorn Tree 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 24 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 1 1
Fagus grandifolia var. grandifolia American beech Tree 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 17 17 23 18 18 29 18 18 20 4 4 8 5 5 9 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Hibiscus rosemallow Shrub 1
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 42 53 51 44 43 14 17
Liriodendron tuliptree 42
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 36 24 28 13
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera Tulip-tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 54 3 3 95 3 3 50 4 4 30 8 8 8
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 17 1
Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 10 10 10 11 11 11 14 14 14
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 4 3 3 12 5 5 15 9 1 6
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 1 3 1 1 1 1
Populus deltoides eastern cottonwood Tree 1
Prunus plum Shrub or Tree 5
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 8
Prunus serotina var. serotina black cherry Tree 12 6
Prunus serrulata Japanese flowering cherry 7 6
Pyrus calleryana Callery pear Exotic 1 2
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 9 9 13 19 19 19
Quercus alba white oak Tree 3
Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Tree 5
Quercus falcata southern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 4 2 2 7 2 2 5 3 3 12 3 3 9 3 3 3 8 8 9 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 10 10 19 11 11 13 11 11 20 13 13 23 13 13 18 13 13 13 8 8 26 4 4 7 4 4 4
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 4
Quercus velutina black oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 15
Salix caroliniana coastal plain willow Tree 6 3
Salix nigra black willow Tree 5
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub 5 8
Unknown Shrub or Tree 3 3 3 9 9 9
63 63 169 66 66 175 72 72 211 43 43 233 43 43 218 47 47 234 46 46 153 47 47 107 76 76 76
17 17 19 14 14 17 15 15 22 12 12 23 12 12 27 13 13 22 12 12 20 12 12 18 13 13 13
364 364 977 382 382 1012 416 416 1220 249 249 1347 249 249 1260 272 272 1353 266 266 885 272 272 619 439 439 439
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Table 9 Con't. Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Dye Branch / Project No. 92255
0.17 0.17
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
7 7 7
0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
7 7 7 7 7 7
Annual Means
MY8 (2019)MY7 (2018)MY6 (2018)MY5 (2015)MY4 (2014)MY3 (2013)MY2 (2012)MY1 (2011)MY0 (2011)
Temporary Plot 1
10m x 10m
Temporary Plot 2
10m x 10m
Temporary Plot 3
10m x 10m
Temporary Plot 4
5m x 20m
Stem Count 10 20 26 18
Size (Ares)1 1 1 1
Size (Acres)0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Stems Per Acre 500 1000 1300 900
Table 9 Con't. Total Planted and Natural Stem Recruits (Temporary Random Plots)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
* Specific species were not collected per plot however the majority of the stems included Betula Nigra , Liriodendron tulipifera ,
Acer rubrum , Plantanus occidentalis , Acer negundo , and Liquidambar styraciflua .
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P-all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Left Descending Bank
Upstream
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width (ft)---7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 N/A 1 8.9 11.1 11.3 14.1 1.8 7 -10.0 -5.5 7.2 7.2 8.9 N/A 2
Floodprone Width (ft)14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 N/A 1 19.0 54.0 36.0 100.0 38.1 5 -28.0 ->30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)---1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 1 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.6 0.3 7 -0.7 -0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 N/A 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 N/A 1 1.0 1.5 1.3 2.4 0.5 7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 N/A 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 N/A 1 6.8 9.6 8.4 18.4 3.9 7 -7.0 -3.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 N/A 2
Width/Depth Ratio 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 N/A 1 6.9 11.2 11.7 15.0 NA 3 -14.3 -10.3 10.8 10.8 11.2 N/A 2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 N/A 1 3.8 6.8 7.7 8.9 NA 3 -2.8 ->3.4 >4.4 >4.4 >5.4 N/A 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 N/A 1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 NA 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)---------------6.8 23.4 19.5 53.9 14.84 14
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.012 0.034 -0.088 --0.006 0.027 0.026 0.052 0.016 6 -0.048 -0.004 0.023 0.022 0.049 0.01 14
Pool Length (ft)4.7 8.2 -11.9 --3.5 19.3 19.6 32.8 11.5 6 13.8 20.7 27.6 5.8 16.2 16.9 39.1 7.17 24
Pool Max Depth (ft)-2.6 ---1.8 2.6 2.9 3.2 0.5 7 -2.0 -1.8 3.0 2.9 3.7 0.48 18
Pool Spacing (ft)22.8 86.0 -228.2 --18.0 52.7 40.2 140.8 41.7 7 18.4 27.6 32.2 4.5 38.7 36.4 111.0 24.40 24
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)5.3 10.8 -22.6 --26.0 49.1 40.0 119.0 29.8 9 23.0 32.2 41.4 11.3 30.6 37.0 46.7 12.3 16
Radius of Curvature (ft)3.9 19.6 -37.0 --5.0 23.8 22.0 48.0 14.6 9 18.4 27.6 36.8 8.3 13.7 12.0 29.9 5.7 16
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.6 2.8 -5.3 --0.6 2.1 1.8 4.3 1.3 9 1.8 2.8 3.7 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)13.6 42.0 -71.0 --26.0 72.9 69.0 155.0 47.6 9 46.0 55.2 64.4 38.8 77.4 79.1 167.0 36.1 11
Meander Width Ratio 0.8 1.5 -3.2 --2.5 4.7 3.6 10.1 2.7 7 2.3 3.2 4.1 4.9 6.6 6.6 8.2 N/A 2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft 2
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Item does not apply.Non-Applicable.
-
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch (977 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
----
45 - 180 ---
E4 E4 / C4 / C5 C4 C
---
6.6 - 7.8 4.1 - 7.0 5.5 - 6.7
44.3 - 52.8 35.0 - 128.1 38.4 - 46.6
---
---977
1.14 1.15 - 2.22 1.14 1.08
0.0190 0.0057 - 0.0130 0.0190 -
---0.0191
---
--
--
- Information unavailable.
--
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width (ft)----11.2 ----16.0 18.5 -20.6 ---20.1 -25.7 28.4 26.9 32.7 N/A 3
Floodprone Width (ft)-89.5 ----67.2 70.2 -72.8 --70.9 76.9 88.8 54.4 64.9 58.6 81.8 N/A 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)----1.6 ----1.6 1.6 -1.7 --1.5 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 N/A 3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)-2.8 ----1.5 1.9 -2.4 --1.5 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.8 2.5 3.6 N/A 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)18.1 20.2 19.7 22.9 NA 3 27.4 30.3 -33.4 --31.0 29.5 36.3 32.5 46.9 N/A 3
Width/Depth Ratio 6.2 7.0 7.0 7.9 NA 3 9.3 11.4 -12.7 --13.0 20.3 22.6 22.8 24.6 N/A 3
Entrenchment Ratio >3.2 >4.4 >5.0 >5.0 NA 3 3.5 3.8 -4.4 --3.5 3.8 4.4 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.5 N/A 3
Bank Height Ratio -1.0 ----1.0 1.2 -1.4 --1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)------6.1 17.6 -30.2 --6.6 19.1 32.7 20.1 51.6 47.1 97 29.5 8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.002 0.014 -0.042 --0.006 0.028 -0.066 --0.007 0.030 0.070 0.002 0.006 0.005 0.016 0.005 8
Pool Length (ft)------18.3 35.1 -62.9 --19.9 38.1 68.1 8.76 24.6 22.4 66.4 13 20
Pool Max Depth (ft)------2.2 2.9 -3.3 --2.1 2.7 3.1 2.1 3.44 3.61 4.48 0.67 20
Pool Spacing (ft)------50.3 78.9 -105.8 --54.5 85.5 114.7 24.1 66.8 65.3 125 28.6 19
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)6.6 24.3 -56.9 --36.0 67.0 -150.0 --39.0 72.6 162.6 28.5 45.0 48.4 54.1 8.34 17
Radius of Curvature (ft)14.5 52.4 -148.8 --19.0 49.0 -115.0 --20.6 53.1 124.6 23.6 31.3 31.2 39.6 4.75 14
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)1.3 4.7 -13.3 --1.0 2.7 -6.2 --1.0 2.7 6.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)40.1 79.7 -172.7 --33.0 94.0 -155.0 --35.8 102 168.0 100.5 130.0 138.2 153.3 18.2 12
Meander Width Ratio 0.6 2.2 -5.1 --1.9 3.6 -8.1 --1.9 3.6 8.1 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 0.21 3
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non-Applicable.
---0.0083
---
1.04 1.20 1.20 1.21
0.0090 0.0088 0.0080 0.0080
---
2,086 1,034 2,405 2,455
-6.2 - 6.9 4.2 3.5
-112.2 - 124.8 128 110
---
E4 C4 C5 C
30 - 100 ---
--
-
-
-
-
Monitoring Baseline
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Upstream (1,465 feet)
Reference Reach Data
UT to Ostin CreekPre-Existing Condition
-
-
- Information unavailable.
DesignRegional Curve
-
-
--
-
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD N
Bankfull Width (ft)---14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 NA 1 16.0 18.5 -20.6 ---20.1 -18.4 18.6 18.6 18.8 N/A 3
Floodprone Width (ft)22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 NA 1 67.2 70.2 -72.8 --70.9 76.9 88.8 48.7 61.8 61.8 74.8 N/A 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)---1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 NA 1 1.6 1.6 -1.7 --1.5 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 N/A 3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 NA 1 1.5 1.9 -2.4 --1.5 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 N/A 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)17.4 17.4 17.4 2.4 NA 1 27.4 30.3 -33.4 --31.0 34.0 36.1 36.1 38.1 N/A 3
Width/Depth Ratio 12.5 12.5 12.5 2.4 NA 1 9.3 11.4 -12.7 --13.0 9.3 9.6 9.6 9.9 N/A 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.4 NA 1 3.5 3.8 -4.4 --3.5 3.8 4.4 2.7 3.4 3.4 4.0 N/A 3
Bank Height Ratio 4.9 4.9 4.9 2.4 NA 1 1.0 1.2 -1.4 --1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)------6.1 17.6 -30.2 --6.6 19.1 32.7 15.7 50.3 55.7 79.3 20.2 7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.003 0.021 -0.121 --0.006 0.028 -0.066 --0.007 0.030 0.070 0.001 0.006 0.006 0.014 0.004 7
Pool Length (ft)2.9 24.8 -120 --18.3 35.1 -62.9 --19.9 38.1 68.1 10.1 19.9 15.9 39.6 8.91 14
Pool Max Depth (ft)-3.1 ----2.2 2.9 -3.3 --2.1 2.7 3.1 3.3 3.91 3.77 5.05 0.59 12
Pool Spacing (ft)79.0 162.0 -261.0 --50.3 78.9 -105.8 --54.5 85.5 114.7 15.3 57.5 38.8 130 41.5 14
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)15.6 30.6 -67.7 --36.0 67.0 -150.0 --39.0 72.6 162.6 28.3 49.2 57.5 65.4 15.4 9
Radius of Curvature (ft)11.0 42.1 -81.9 --19.0 49.0 -115.0 --20.6 53.1 124.6 32.7 40.7 42.2 50.1 5.6 7
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)0.7 2.9 -5.6 --1.0 2.7 -6.2 --1.0 2.7 6.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)62.0 103.0 -157 --33.0 94.0 -155.0 --35.8 102 168.0 138.9 162.2 157.3 210.5 27.2 6
Meander Width Ratio 1.1 2.1 -4.6 --1.9 3.6 -8.1 --1.9 3.6 8.1 2.4 2.8 2.8 3.1 0.51 2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Item does not apply.Non-Applicable.
- Information unavailable.
--
--
---0.0106
---
1.14 1.46 1.09 1.10
0.0110 0.0090 0.0095 -
---
---870
-6.1 - 7.2 4.2 3.5
-105.4 - 126.0 128 110
-
--
CG4cC4C5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Downstream (870 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
UT to Ostin Creek Design Monitoring Baseline
--
30 - 100 ---
---
--
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Parameter
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -35% 4% 42% 13% 7%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% - - - - - -- - - - - -
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)0.9 1.2 2.0 8.0 10.1 88.9 - 0.21 0.5 3.5 13.9 26.6 45.0 -
Entrenchment Class
<1.5 / 1.5 - 1.99 / 2 - 4.9 / 5.0 - 9.9 / >10 - - - - -- - - - -
Incision Class
<1.2 / 1.2 - 1.49 / 1.5 - 1.99 / >2.0 - - - -- - - -
N/A - Item does not apply.Non-Applicable.
- Information unavailable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch (977 feet)
Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Parameter
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - 28% 15% 34% 20% 3%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% - - - - - -- - - - - -
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)0.15 0.4 3.3 10.3 13.7 45.7 - - - - - - - -
Entrenchment Class
<1.5 / 1.5 - 1.99 / 2 - 4.9 / 5.0 - 9.9 / >10 - - - - -- - - - -
Incision Class
<1.2 / 1.2 - 1.49 / 1.5 - 1.99 / >2.0 - - - -- - - -
Non-Applicable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Upstream (1,465 feet)
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
- Information unavailable.
Reference Reach Data DesignPre-Existing Condition Monitoring Baseline
Parameter
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - 43% 6% 34% 13% 3%
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be% - - - - - -- - - - - -
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)0.15 0.28 0.56 10.7 13.0 45.7 - - - - - - - -
Entrenchment Class
<1.5 / 1.5 - 1.99 / 2 - 4.9 / 5.0 - 9.9 / >10 - - - - -- - - - -
Incision Class
<1.2 / 1.2 - 1.49 / 1.5 - 1.99 / >2.0 - - - -- - - -
N/A - Item does not apply.Non-Applicable.
- Information unavailable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Downstream (870 feet)
Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8
Record Elevation (datum) Used 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.4 836.4 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.0 826.1 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.6
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used -------836.4 836.5 -------826.3 826.3 -------821.9 821.9
Bankfull Width (ft)9.7 10.2 9.4 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.0 10.1 8.9 10.6 8.0 8.4 5.9 6.0 6.4 5.5 5.3 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.1 5.7 5.8 6.2 5.9 7.2
Floodprone Width (ft)>50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 >30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.1 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.5 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)18.9 15.2 14.3 14.0 15.1 14.2 13.1 13.1 13.1 7.0 6.3 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.7 6.6 6.6 6.6 3.0 2.8 4.0 3.6 4.2 4.3 5.0 5.0 5.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 5.0 6.8 6.2 6.1 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.7 8.6 11.2 18.1 16.4 17.3 8.3 7.5 6.3 4.6 5.2 10.3 12.7 10.6 10.4 7.6 7.9 7.7 7.0 7.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >5.1 >4.9 >5.3 >5.4 >5.5 >5.4 >5.3 >5 >4.7 >3.4 >2.8 >3.8 >3.6 >5.1 >5.0 >4.7 >5.5 >5.7 >5.4 >5.0 >4.6 >4.9 >5.3 >5.1 >4.8 >5.1 >4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3
d50 (mm)N/A 5.7 4.8 4.1 1.5 1.1 ---N/A 8.4 14.0 2.1 4.7 48 ---N/A 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.2 1.7 ---
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and Bank Height Ratio have been calculated using a fixed Abkf associated with the Post-Repair MY6 Report rather than a fixed Abkf associated with the Baseline Report.
Table 11a. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch (971 Feet)
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Riffle
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8
Record Elevation (datum) Used 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.2 824.1 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.7 817.4 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.4 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.7 812.5
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used -------824.5 824.5 -------817.4 817.8 -------815.1 815.3 -------812.4 812.5
Bankfull Width (ft)25.7 23.8 22.9 20.8 21.5 20.7 13.2 11.3 12.9 17.1 17.0 16.8 16.4 15.6 15.1 21.8 22.0 19.6 32.7 28.7 27.7 26.9 26.7 27.2 17.5 21.3 17.4 26.9 24.1 21.3 20.1 19.9 17.1 12.0 15.0 15.8
Floodprone Width (ft)>58.6 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >50 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >81.8 >78.2 .78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >54.4 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.5 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.4 2.8 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)32.5 27.1 23.1 22.4 21.1 21.0 15.8 15.8 15.8 28.8 23.7 35.0 35.1 33.1 29.7 41.9 41.9 41.9 46.9 37.5 36.2 36.0 34.2 31.3 34.2 34.2 34.2 29.5 24.2 19.9 21.3 19.4 17.9 21.1 21.1 21.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 20.3 20.9 22.6 19.3 21.9 20.4 11.0 8.1 8.4 10.2 12.2 8.1 7.7 7.4 7.7 11.3 11.5 9.0 22.8 22.0 21.2 20.0 20.8 23.6 9.0 13.2 9.5 24.6 24.0 22.9 18.9 20.4 16.3 6.8 10.6 11.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.3 >2.2 >2.3 >2.5 >2.5 >2.6 >4.0 >4.7 >4.1 >2.9 >2.8 >2.8 >2.9 >3.0 >3.1 >2.2 >2.1 2.2 >2.5 >2.7 >2.8 >2.9 >2.9 >2.9 >4.5 >3.7 >4.5 >2.0 >2.2 >2.5 >2.6 >2.6 >3.1 >4.4 >3.5 >3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio*1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0
d50 (mm)N/A 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.9 0.42 ---N/A 6.0 1.7 13.0 1.6 1.9 ---N/A 1.9 4.5 1.6 1.2 1.5 ---N/A 2.7 8.0 7.4 2.4 1.3 ---
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and Bank Height Ratio dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf associated with the Post-Repair MY6 Report rather than a fixed Abkf associated with the Baseline Report.
Table 11a. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Upstream (1,471 Feet)
Cross Section 4
Riffle Cross Section 5 Pool Cross Section 6
Riffle
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Parameter
Dimension Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8
Record Elevation (datum) Used 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.4 809.3 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1 801.1 801.1 801.1 801.1 801.1 801.1 801.1 801.0 801.1
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used -------809.1 809.3 -------806.1 806.1 -------801.1 801.5
Bankfull Width (ft)18.8 18.8 19.6 18.6 19.6 19.6 19.3 22.1 18.9 26.3 26.3 24.3 24.6 23.8 23.7 27.7 29.2 27.5 18.4 18.5 17.7 17.9 17.8 16.6 17.4 17.4 19.7
Floodprone Width (ft)>74.8 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >70 >70 >70 >70 >70 >70 >70 >70 >70 >48.7 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.0 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.8 1.7 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.1 3.0 3.9 3.3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.1 3.4 3.6 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)38.1 35.9 41.0 36.8 43.2 41.8 42.3 42.3 42.3 48.4 43.6 55.3 63.5 61.1 62.7 42.1 42.1 42.1 34.0 29.5 27.8 29.4 31.6 29.4 32.0 32.0 32.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.3 9.9 9.3 9.4 8.9 9.2 8.8 11.6 8.4 14.3 15.9 10.7 9.6 9.3 9.0 18.2 20.3 18.0 9.9 11.7 11.3 11.0 10.0 9.4 9.4 9.4 12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >4.0 >3.9 >3.8 >4.0 >3.8 >3.7 >3.8 >3.3 >3.4 >2.7 >2.7 2.9 >2.8 >2.9 >2.9 >2.5 >2.4 >2.5 >2.7 >2.6 >2.7 >2.7 >2.7 >2.9 >2.7 >2.7 >2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio*1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2
d50 (mm)N/A 1.3 1.1 0.9 2.0 0.26 ---N/A 0.72 6.4 1.7 1.4 0.32 ---N/A 1.0 0.9 0.1 1.8 2.7 ---
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and Bank Height Ratio dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf associated with the Post-Repair MY6 Report rather than a fixed Abkf associated with the Baseline Report.
Table 11a. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Downstream (869 Feet)
Cross Section 8
Riffle
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)5.5 7.2 7.2 8.9 N/A 2 6.0 8.3 8.3 10.6 N/A 2 6.5 7.3 7.3 8.0 N/A 2 6.1 7.3 7.3 8.4 N/A 2 5.9 6.0 6.0 6.1 N/A 2 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 N/A 2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.4 N/A 2 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.9 N/A 2 6.5 6.9 6.9 7.2 N/A 2
Floodprone Width (ft)>30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 >30 >30 >30 >30 N/A 2 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 N/A 2 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 N/A 2 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 N/A 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 N/A 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 N/A 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 N/A 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 N/A 2 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 N/A 2 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 N/A 2 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 N/A 2 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 N/A 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 N/A 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 N/A 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 N/A 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 N/A 2 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 N/A 2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 N/A 2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.5 N/A 2 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 N/A 2 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.7 N/A 2 1.5 1.8 1.8 2.1 N/A 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)3.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 N/A 2 2.8 4.6 4.6 6.3 N/A 2 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 N/A 2 3.6 3.9 3.9 4.1 N/A 2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 N/A 2 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.7 N/A 2 5.0 5.8 5.8 6.6 N/A 2 5.0 5.8 5.8 6.6 N/A 2 5.0 5.8 5.8 6.6 N/A 2
Width/Depth Ratio 10.3 10.8 10.8 11.2 N/A 2 12.7 15.4 15.4 18.1 N/A 2 10.6 13.5 13.5 16.4 N/A 2 10.4 13.9 13.9 17.3 N/A 2 8.3 8.5 8.5 8.7 N/A 2 7.5 7.7 7.7 7.9 N/A 2 6.3 7.0 7.0 7.7 N/A 2 4.6 5.8 5.8 7.0 N/A 2 5.2 6.2 6.2 7.2 N/A 2
Entrenchment Ratio >3.4 >4.4 >4.4 >5.4 N/A 2 >2.8 >3.9 >3.9 >5.0 N/A 2 >3.8 >4.2 >4.2 >4.6 N/A 2 3.6 4.3 4.3 4.9 N/A 2 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.1 N/A 2 5.0 5.1 5.1 5.1 N/A 2 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 N/A 2 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.5 N/A 2 4.9 6.0 5.6 6.3 N/A 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 N/A 2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 N/A 2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 N/A 2
Riffle Length (ft)6.8 23.4 19.5 53.9 14.8 14 6.9 22.9 22.7 50.3 13.3 17 6.4 24.3 15.2 53.7 17.0 13 8.4 24.4 13.2 53.7 17.8 12 7.7 23.4 18.2 48.8 15.2 12 5.2 27.2 29.1 48.7 17.6 9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.004 0.023 0.022 0.049 0.013 14 0.002 0.020 0.018 0.052 0.015 17 0.002 0.027 0.022 0.064 0.020 13 0.005 0.025 0.021 0.057 0.017 12 0.005 0.019 0.018 0.037 0.011 12 0.006 0.017 0.014 0.029 0.009 9
Pool Length (ft)5.8 16.2 16.9 39.1 7.2 24 4.9 13.0 12.5 38.9 6.8 25 8.4 16.5 14.8 39.0 6.9 26 6.8 16.6 14.8 39.2 7.2 26 5.1 16.4 14.3 37.5 7.3 26 4.5 16.4 14.7 39.8 7.7 27
Pool Max Depth (ft)1.8 3.0 2.9 3.7 0.5 18 1.0 2.8 2.9 3.4 0.6 19 1.0 2.5 2.5 3.6 0.8 24 0.8 2.2 2.4 3.4 0.8 24 1.0 2.2 2.2 3.2 0.7 1 25 1 1.2 2.5 2.8 3.5 0.8 26
Pool Spacing (ft)4.5 38.7 36.4 111.0 24.4 24 12.0 39.1 33.3 110.2 24.0 24 12.0 36.9 30.1 86.7 20.6 25 11.0 36.7 27.9 96.6 22.5 25 14.9 36.6 27.8 89.3 20.9 25 9.9 35.6 28.6 93.4 20.4 26
Channel Belt Width (ft)11.3 30.6 37.0 46.7 12.26 16
Radius of Curvature (ft)8.3 13.7 12.0 29.9 5.70 16
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)38.8 77.4 79.1 167.0 36.08 11
Meander Width Ratio 4.2 5.4 5.4 6.7 N/A 2
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%35%4%42%13%7%42%6%34%13%6%34%4%46%11%6%32%3%47%13%6%31%4%47%12%6%27%4%48%15%6%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*0%38%54%7%0%0%0%30%67%3%0%0%1%41%53%4%0%0%0%49%45%6%0%0%0%52.5%26.2%21.1%0%0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)0.86 1.5 4.1 7.0 28.3 71.7 0.2 1.35 24.85 65 93
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
MY - 3 MY - 4 MY - 5
1.12
0.0177
0.0183 0.01900.0189
Profile
Pattern
MY - 6
1.07
0.0203
MY - 1 MY - 2
C C4 C4 C4
-
0.0191
971 970
1.08
0.0203
0.0198
0%
N/A
N/A
1.08
0.0200
0.0195
0%
N/A
N/A
1.08
0%
N/A
N/A
0%
N/A
N/A
1%
N/A
N/A
970
1%
N/A
N/A
958
1.06
0.0186
MY - 7 MY - 8
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryDye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch (971 feet)
969
C4
977
Baseline
Additional Reach Parameters
C4
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)25.7 28.4 26.9 32.7 N/A 3 23.8 25.5 24.1 28.7 N/A 3 21.3 24.0 22.9 27.7 N/A 3 20.1 22.6 20.8 26.9 N/A 3 19.9 22.6 21.5 26.5 N/A 3 17.1 21.7 20.7 27.2 N/A 3 12.0 14.2 13.2 17.5 3.0 3 11.3 15.9 15.0 21.3 5.1 3 18.2 20.0 20.0 21.7 1.9 3
Floodprone Width (ft)54.4 64.9 58.6 81.8 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 N/A 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 15.0 3 52.6 61.2 52.8 78.2 14.7 3 47.6 61.2 61.2 74.8 12.0 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 N/A 3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 N/A 3 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.3 N/A 3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 N/A 3 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.3 N/A 3 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 N/A 3 1.2 1.7 1.8 2.0 0.4 3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.6 0.1 3 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.1 0.2 3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.2 2.8 2.5 3.6 N/A 3 2.0 2.4 2.0 3.2 N/A 3 2.1 2.5 2.1 3.2 N/A 3 2.3 2.7 2.4 3.3 N/A 3 2.2 2.6 2.3 3.3 N/A 3 2.2 2.5 2.3 3.0 N/A 3 1.9 2.5 2.4 3.3 0.7 3 2.1 2.6 2.3 3.3 0.6 3 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 0.4 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)29.5 36.3 32.5 46.9 N/A 3 24.2 29.6 27.1 37.5 N/A 3 19.9 26.4 23.1 36.2 N/A 3 21.3 26.6 22.4 36.0 N/A 3 19.4 24.9 21.1 34.2 N/A 3 17.9 23.4 21.0 31.3 N/A 3 15.8 23.7 21.1 34.2 9.5 3 15.8 23.7 21.1 34.2 9.5 3 15.8 23.7 21.1 34.2 7.8 3
Width/Depth Ratio 20.3 22.6 22.8 24.6 N/A 3 20.9 22.3 22.0 24.0 N/A 3 21.2 22.2 22.6 22.9 N/A 3 18.9 19.4 19.3 20.0 N/A 3 20.4 21.0 20.8 21.9 N/A 3 16.3 20.1 20.4 23.6 N/A 3 6.8 8.9 9.0 11.0 2.1 3 8.1 10.6 10.6 13.2 2.6 3 8.7 10.4 10.4 12.1 1.0 3
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.5 N/A 3 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.7 N/A 3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.8 N/A 3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.9 N/A 3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.9 N/A 3 2.6 2.9 2.9 3.1 N/A 3 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.5 0.3 3 3.5 4.0 3.7 4.7 0.6 3 2.2 2.8 2.8 3.3 0.5 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.1 3 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.1 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 0.1 3
Riffle Length (ft)20.1 51.6 47.1 97.0 29.5 8 17.5 40.6 33.3 75.1 19.0 11 15.5 37.5 34.6 58.6 14.4 9 16.8 41.4 47.0 54.0 16.2 6 19.4 40.3 39.6 63.9 18.1 6 10.1 32.9 25.6 58.3 21.1 7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.002 0.006 0.005 0.016 0.005 8 0.002 0.007 0.005 0.019 0.005 11 0.001 0.007 0.004 0.016 0.005 9 0.002 0.008 0.006 0.016 0.006 6 0.003 0.007 0.005 0.016 0.005 6 0.004 0.011 0.007 0.031 0.010 7
Pool Length (ft)8.8 24.6 22.4 66.4 13.0 20 10.7 29.8 27.3 75.6 15.9 20 8.8 29.5 23.2 76.3 18.7 20 7.7 26.2 21.8 81.6 17.7 21 8.9 26.9 20.6 85.8 19.4 21 8.1 28.3 21.7 94.0 19.5 21
Pool Max Depth (ft)2.1 3.4 3.6 4.5 0.7 20 1.8 3.3 3.4 4.7 0.8 20 2.2 3.7 3.8 5.0 0.8 20 1.6 3.1 3.1 4.3 0.8 20 1.4 3.0 3.4 4.4 0.9 20 2.00 3.55 3.64 4.88 0.84 20
Pool Spacing (ft)24.1 66.8 65.3 124.9 28.6 19 31.7 67.7 69.0 128.2 27.5 19 20.7 62.1 55.7 127.6 29.6 19 13.2 65.1 64.0 127.5 30.7 18 11.7 58.7 48.2 118.6 30.8 20 15.1 57.9 45.8 114.4 30.1 20
Channel Belt Width (ft)28.5 45.0 48.4 54.1 8.3 17
Radius of Curvature (ft)23.6 31.3 31.2 39.6 4.7 14
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)100.5 130.0 138.2 153.3 18.2 12
Meander Width Ratio 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 N/A 3
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%28%15%34%20%3%31%10%41%15%4%23%14%40%19%3%17%15%38%26%3%17%23%39%17%4%16%23%42%16%4%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*0%50%47%3%0%0%2%45%50%3%0%0%3%43%48%6%0%0%5%58%35%2%0%0%2.3%77.5%19%1.1%0%0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)0.48 1.08 1.8 3.3 6.7 23.0 0.235 0.89 1.07 3.47 23.7
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt-Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
1,465 1,471 1,465 1,447
0.0092
0.0091
MY - 4 MY - 5 MY - 6
C4
Additional Reach Parameters
C C5
1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 1 1.13
0.0094 0.0095 0.0091 0.0094
C4 C4 C4
-0.0092 0.0091 0.0092 0.0093
0.0093
0%0%7%10%10%
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
MY - 7 MY - 8
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryDye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Upstream (1,471 feet)
Profile
Pattern
Baseline MY - 1 MY - 2 MY - 3
1,448 1 1,437
9%
1.15
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

Parameter
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)18.4 18.6 18.6 18.8 N/A 2 18.5 18.7 18.7 18.8 N/A 2 17.7 18.7 18.7 19.6 N/A 2 17.9 20.4 18.6 24.6 N/A 2 17.8 18.7 18.7 19.6 N/A 2 16.60 18.10 18.10 19.60 N/A 2 17.4 18.4 18.4 19.3 N/A 2 17.4 19.8 19.8 22.1 N/A 2 18.2 20.0 20.0 21.7 N/A 2
Floodprone Width (ft)48.7 61.8 61.8 74.8 N/A 2 47.6 60.6 60.6 73.5 N/A 2 47.6 60.6 60.6 73.5 N/A 2 47.6 63.7 70.0 73.5 N/A 2 47.6 60.6 60.6 73.5 N/A 2 47.60 60.55 60.55 73.50 N/A 2 47.6 60.6 60.6 73.5 N/A 2 47.6 60.6 60.6 73.5 N/A 2 47.6 61.2 61.2 74.8 N/A 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 N/A 2 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.9 N/A 2 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.1 N/A 2 1.6 2.1 2.0 2.6 N/A 2 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.2 N/A 2 1.80 1.95 1.95 2.10 N/A 2 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.2 N/A 2 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 N/A 2 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.1 N/A 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 N/A 2 2.4 2.7 2.7 3.0 N/A 2 2.5 3.2 3.2 3.9 N/A 2 2.7 3.4 3.3 4.1 N/A 2 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.9 N/A 2 2.60 3.25 3.25 3.90 N/A 2 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.9 N/A 2 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.4 N/A 2 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 N/A 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)34.0 36.1 36.1 38.1 N/A 2 29.5 32.7 32.7 35.9 N/A 2 27.8 34.4 34.4 41.0 N/A 2 29.4 43.2 36.8 63.5 N/A 2 31.6 37.4 37.4 43.2 N/A 2 29.40 35.60 35.60 41.80 N/A 2 32.0 37.2 37.2 42.3 N/A 2 32.0 37.2 37.2 42.3 N/A 2 34.0 36.1 36.1 38.1 N/A 2
Width/Depth Ratio 9.3 9.6 9.6 9.9 N/A 2 9.9 10.8 10.8 11.7 N/A 2 9.3 10.3 10.3 11.3 N/A 2 9.4 10.0 9.6 11.0 N/A 2 8.9 9.5 9.5 10.0 N/A 2 9.20 9.30 9.30 9.40 N/A 2 8.8 9.1 9.1 9.4 N/A 2 9.4 10.5 10.5 11.6 N/A 2 8.7 10.4 10.4 12.1 N/A 2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 3.4 3.4 4.0 N/A 2 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.9 N/A 2 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.8 N/A 2 2.7 3.2 2.8 4.0 N/A 2 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.8 N/A 2 2.90 3.30 3.30 3.70 N/A 2 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.8 N/A 2 2.7 3.0 3.0 3.3 N/A 2 2.2 2.8 2.8 3.3 N/A 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 N/A 2
Riffle Length (ft)15.7 50.3 55.7 79.3 20.2 7 14.4 48.7 43.0 87.0 24.1 7 14.7 37.3 39.9 54.7 18.2 4 18.9 42.8 41.0 70.4 23.4 4 18.1 43.4 39.0 77.7 26.5 4 18.7 46.6 44.0 77.2 29.3 3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.001 0.006 0.006 0.014 0.004 7 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.002 7 0.003 0.007 0.007 0.010 0.004 4 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.008 0.004 4 #####0.004 0.001 0.014 0.007 4 0.002 0.007 0.004 0.015 0.007 3
Pool Length (ft)10.1 19.9 15.9 39.6 8.9 14 9.7 17.6 17.5 26.1 5.8 15 7.6 26.2 31.4 44.2 13.0 14 8.7 26.6 30.2 56.6 15.7 15 8.0 23.4 23.7 43.3 10.7 16 5.9 23.1 20.2 57.9 15.0 16
Pool Max Depth (ft)3.3 3.9 3.8 5.1 0.6 12 3.2 3.9 4.0 4.9 0.5 13 3.0 4.2 3.8 6.7 1.0 13 3.0 3.9 3.8 5.3 0.7 12 1.8 3.4 3.4 5.0 0.8 14 3.4 4.3 4.2 5.8 0.7 14
Pool Spacing (ft)15.3 57.5 38.8 130.2 41.5 14 10.8 56.8 40.6 129.1 40.4 14 10.0 60.6 61.6 109.9 34.9 13 12.0 57.3 48.3 114.8 36.8 14 9.7 53.4 39.2 122.8 38.0 15 10.9 53.5 38.4 116.5 36.2 15
Channel Belt Width (ft)28.3 49.2 57.5 65.4 15.4 9
Radius of Curvature (ft)32.7 40.7 42.2 50.1 5.6 7
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 N/A 1
Meander Wavelength (ft)138.9 162.2 157.3 210.5 27.2 6
Meander Width Ratio 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 N/A 2
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%43%6%34%13%3%39%10%31%18%2%17%19%42%19%3%20%11%46%20%4%20%14%43%20%3%19%19%42%18%2%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*3%75%22%0%0%0 3%59%38%0%0%0%12%52%36%0%0%0%5%56%38%1%0%0%24.6%46.5%27.9%0.9%0%0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)1.1 1.5 1.9 3.9 8.3 31 0.062 0.705 1.48 4.72 8.955
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt-Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
MY - 6
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0%0%8%10%10%11%
0.0106 0.0104 0.0101 0.0089 0.0103 0.0088
-0.0099 0.0094 0.0099 0.0098 0.0095
1.10 1.09 1.10 1.09 1.09 1.07
870 869 875 867 868 855
MY - 3 MY - 4 MY - 5
C C5 C5 C5 C5 C5
MY - 7 MY - 8
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
Baseline MY - 1 MY - 2
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data SummaryDye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch-Downstream (869 feet)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix E Hydrologic Data

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Date of Occurrence Method Feet Above Average
Bankfull Elevation
7/8/2011 Water level logger 1.07
9/21/2011 Water level logger 1.14
9/24/2011 Water level logger 0.52
5/16/2012 Water level logger 1.63
7/11/2012 Water level logger 0.21
9/29/2012 Water level logger 0.22
4/12/2013 Water level logger 0.08
6/28/2013 Water level logger 0.81
6/30/2013 Water level logger 0.72
7/9/2013 Water level logger 1.62
7/31/2013 Water level logger 0.53
1/11/2014 Water level logger 1.29
5/14/2014 Water level logger 0.07
6/8/2014 Water level logger 0.21
Between 6/5/2015 and
11/7/2015 Wrack Lines 0.5
4/24/2018 Wrack Lines Unknown
1/25/2019 Wrack Lines Unknown

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix F Hydrologic Data

Appendix F
Invasive Species Treatment Logs

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix F Hydrologic Data

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0652
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Slte Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date 07-01-2019
RECEIVED
AUG292019
UlViSION OF
MITivATiON SERVICES
StartTime 15:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover Clear Temp (F)
Wind Direction NNW Wind Speed
Applicators Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method Basal Bark
Herbicide Garcon® 3A (triclopyr)
Herbicide Rate (%) 15 Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
N
Other
Other Rate/Amt
16:10
3of3
90
1-5 mph
30 fl oz
Diluent Diesel fuel
Total Solution 1.5 fl oz
Species Controlled Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description Basal barked target species within the easement south of Carbarrus Ave. The
Privet and Rose were scattered but the Kudzu was concentrated to one pocket at
the centered of the that area.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0650
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
RECEIVED
Project Site
Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
AUG 2 9 2019
DIVISION OF
Date
07-01-2019
MITIGATION SERVICES
Start Time
10:00 End Time
15:00
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No If NO, this is PAL # of ## 1 of 3
Sky Cover
Clear Temp (F)
90
Wind Direction
NNW Wind Speed
1-5 mph
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method
Cut and Stump Spray
Herbicide
Roundup® Custom (glyphosate)
Herbicide Rate (%)
50 Total Concentrate
50 fl oz
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
N
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent
Water
Total Solution
100 fl oz
Species Controlled
Callery Pear
Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description
Mainly Cut and Stump Sprayed Kudzu within the easement
north of Carbarrus
Ave. The kudzu was mostly contained to small pockets
throughout the easement.
Privet, Rose, and Callery Pear were found scattered within the easement. Overall
the site is looking great.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0651
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Slte Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date 07-01-2019
Start Time 15:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? No
Sky Cover Clear
Wind Direction
NNW
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method
Mist Blower
Herbicide
Transline® (clopyralid)
Herbicide Rate (%)
2
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1) Agri-Dex©
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate 1
N
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent Water
Total Solution 1.5
RECEIVE®
AUG 2 9 2019
DIVISION OF
MITIGATION SERVICES
If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Temp (F)
Wind Speed
Total Concentrate
16:00
2of3
90
1-5 mph
3.8 fl oz
Species Controlled Kudzu
Lespedeza spp.
Area Description Foliar treated the ground cover portions of the small pockets of Kudzu found
within the easement.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc- Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0710
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site Dye Branch
Date 09-26-2019
Start Time
9:30
End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No
If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover
Clear
Temp (F)
Wind Direction
SW
Wind Speed
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method
Basal Bark
Herbicide
Garlon® XRT
Herbicide Rate (%)
15
Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
(%)
Other
Other Rate/Amt
15:00
1 of 3
86
6-10 mph
76 fl oz
Diluent Diesel fuel
Total Solution 4 gallons
Species Controlled Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description Some kudzu vines still present near the stream. Small Privet and Multiflora Rose
treated throughout the site.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0711
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site Dye Branch
Date 09-26-2019
Start Time 9:30 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover Clear Temp (F)
Wind Direction SW Wind Speed
Applicators Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method Cut and Stump Spray
Herbicide Roundup® Custom (glyphosate)
Herbicide Rate (%) 50 Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant(Adjudivant 1 Rate
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent Water
Total Solution 40 fi oz
12:30
2of3
86
6-10 mph
20 fl oz
Species Controlled Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description Some Kudzu vines still alive mostly along the stream. Small Privet and Multiflora
Rose present through the site.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc_ Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0712
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site
Dye Branch
Date
09-26-2019
Start Time
12:30 End Time
15:00
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
3 of 3
Sky Cover
Clear Temp (F)
86
Wind Direction
SW Wind Speed
6-10 mph
Applicators
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method
Foliar Spray (Backpack)
Herbicide
Roundup® Custom (glyphosate)
Herbicide Rate (%)
3 Total Concentrate
4 fl oz
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Agri-DexO
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
1
(%)
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent
Water
Total Solution
1 gallon
Species Controlled
Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description
Small Privet and Multiflora Rose present I'm the small section of
the easement
across the street. A few Kudzu vines were also present.
Additional Comments