670001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20181130

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number _ Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Aeenev
-r--••• - -� -. w v � rucmre Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral
Q Emergency p Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visa: 1� Arrival Time: Departure Time: � j 1
rn n F ® County: Ii�IS'�[)�'li Region:
Farm Name: b DIAL
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: 1 V V 1 ,���j11.i oI�j
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Other
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop,
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop,
La er
Non -La er
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure ❑ Application Field
❑ Other.
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If Yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Yes N No NA ❑ NE
Yes ONo DNA ONE
Yes 0 No NA 0 NE
Yes No
Yes No
i
Yes No
NA D NE
DNA D NE
NA M NE
Page I of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: IDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1_ 2 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Yes yQ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I XI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 1P
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 114
No ❑ NA [:]NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 1/V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, 2 etc.-
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis Waste Transfers
Y ❑ ❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - i jDate of inspection: Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon I I�
777 List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: O
14
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A
NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
ll��
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional naees as necessarv).
Pb
SWjt��,be-�31 0�) _�,S)1�
kV-e.,-,A
SUII (lr1G�$IS- 12�1}`IS My
p� �� to c,or�srn��tiZ=t6venU wAC R V, 3
Q�
_M� GIB-�►�-�� �� Reviewer/Inspector Name: (/,'�j��4', Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification C_
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
&xis_tinr or New or Expanded (please circle one) I
General Information:
Name. of Farm:
Nekl+off
F, •ems
(AG)
Facility No
Owners) Name:
Neil+<C4
FA.!%
z1 .
Ise•
Phone No:-
Mailing Address
Farm Location:
0 Qo
Latitude and Longitude: _ _ _ /
County Farm is located in:
_ _ Integrator:
Be
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation, Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
O Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
:YFarrow to Wean 3000
G Farrow to Feeder
O Farruw to Finish
D Gilts
❑ Boars
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Desien CaOacin
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
O Layer
O Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
O Brood
G Feeders
❑ Stockers
Other Type of Livestock: _
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
O Milking
❑ Dry
O Heifers
O Calves
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (f(3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAYFIELD (please circle one)
###:k#:k#�::e:k#:k:k##:e##:F:k###########9:##########:k:k#######:k#####:k###:k####•r-###############:k#-
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage
system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the
storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm
event less severe than the ?=-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. 1 (we)
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
developed by the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at
the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a
technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land
ownership requires written notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a
title transfer.
Name of Lan caner: V 1 s.' ; '
Signature: �� �� '� Date:
Name of N anaber (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:_
, car• C 'rt100 I

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
0 Existing or expanding facility with existing waste aoolication equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not .to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established,
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
Cl New expanded or existing facility without existin waste aoolication equipment for sorav irrigation (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
New expanded or existim facility without existine waste application equipment for land spreading not using spray
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
C oeE JA
Address (Age
Signature:
i`k t'.N Clt,i ID t^^,
Work Completed: 3- 10• vy
Phone No.:
Date- --lo- oy
E) Odor Control Insect Control MotUUt'a_-DVNn F.I ana rimerEenew Action r°tan l3L.
SI. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility incllfde"f°h°'W'aste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Wfl1 4 ^ C a,I lD �-^
Affiliation _WC /> ENR fj''Sia<: "'�r.. Date Work Completed: 3-lo•o 9
Address (Agency):
Signature:
No.:
3-10 .09
0:;
F) Written Notice of New or Exiilndle S_wine rfiiP'
The following signature block is only to bl , O q wv3o filling swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before Jude>r&; Z296) olt vg" , it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contac(165acieoi ?d mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106•805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
te:
AWC .. December 5.2000

E) Odor Control Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD. SI. WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print: d✓(I) dti I I'
Address (Agency):
V
NL p C Nei 'iS,iQ r r6°�•. Date Work Completed: 3^ty vy
Phone No,
A r�
Please return the completed for n#xo�q,`�e.lvtStll of ater Quality at the following address:
w
Department of Etiviioritlienk and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
The
Pease also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Nlanagement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
A\4WC -- December S. 2000

Lagoon 2 Will Not Be Used
j
Surface Area (inside top dike)
69429 sq it
Temporary Storage Period
90 days_
top elevationkk
bottom elevation
�-
——�
133ft ----
55169 sq ft
19.6 ft — - --
------- - - -
foot----------
oot
bottom area
depth -
Structural Freeboard
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr/24 hr storm
8 inches
Volume required
�46306
cu ft
Excess Rainfall
6.6 inches
_
Volume required
J38202
cu ft
25/24 Freeboard Requirement
10.7 feet
Total Temporary Storage Requirement
38202 cu it
Temporary Storage Available
86308 cu ft
Total Freeboard Requirement
1.7 ft
Stop Pump Elevation
_
40.2 ft
Start Pump Elevation
40.9 ft
Additional Volume Above Seasonal High WT
259938 cu ft
I

Lagoon 4 - Primary
Number of Animals
Type of Animals
1500
Farrow - Wean
Surface Area (inside top dike)—
133210 sq ft
90 days
Temporary Storage Period
----�
top elevation
- - -
_ ,45.5 If
bottom elevation 1
_
i37.2 ft
bottom area
__
20213 sq ft
depth
88.3 ft
Structural Freeboard
Depth
fl,�.3feet----Treatment
Required Treatment Volume
55 cu ft
Treatment Volume Available
�193112
cu ft
Temporary Storage Requirements
25 yr/24 hr storm
18 inches
'Volume
required
Transfer to Lagoon_ 3
Excess Rainfall
_
6.6 inches
�Vo—lume
required
Transfer to Lagoon 3
I Waste + Wash Water
Transfer to Lagoon 3

Sludge Removal from Lagoon 4 of AG Farm Located in Onslow County.
Note - Sludge was moved from lagoon 1 to lagoon 4 during this process to recharge lagoon 4
Sludge level in the lagoon averages approximately 5 feet per survey conducted 10i7/2003
Total liquid level in the lagoon is approximately 6.5 feet
Sludge analysis for N taken on 9/4/2003
Analysis shows 1.7 Ibs/1000 gal on N
Analysis shows 60.8 Ibs/1000 gal on P
The analysis is atypical of results for sludge.
The N value is lower than expected, however the P value is higher than expected
A new sample was taken on 10/7/2003.
The plan will be written for a minimum sludge analysis of 6 Ibs/1000
Lagoon Volumes
Bottom area (sq it) 23262
Top area 33210
Total depth (it) 8
Total volume at 6.5 depth 203740.88
Total Sludge volume (cu it) 147397.5
Total Liquid volume (cu ft) 56343,375
Note this is not a closure so likely one foot or more to be :eft in lagoon bottom.
Total Ibs of N to be applied based on one foot of material left in bottom of lagoon.
Total N Ibs
Use Sludge analysis of 6.0 IbsN/1000 5571.20124
Use Liquid analysis of 1.0 Ibs N/1000 421.448445
Total N to be applied 5992.64969
Total acres available for application 81
Lbs of N per acre 73,9833294
Crop to be planted wheat
Rye for crop 55 bu
PAN for crop 130 Ito N/ac
PAN Deficit per acre 56 lb/acre
Waste Application Depth in Inches 0.6
Note Target Application Depth of 0.6 inches of waste.
This will achieve approximately 75 Ids of N per acre.
This application Depth will remove all material execpt one foot from the lagoon.
This total volume of material applied is estimated to be approximately 1,350,000 gallons
This plan is valid for the application period of October and November of 2003.
The farm to receive the waste is located on TTraacct_801 in OOnnnIsoww County,
Technical Specialist Signature ��,{cam✓ �i""'�`�