20020136 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020129

o ?? W A r?Rpi,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
March 13, 2002
DWQ# 02-0136
Wake County
David Webb
SAS Institute, Inc.
SAS Campus Drive
Cary, NC, 27513
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules with Additional Condition
Dear Mr. Webb:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 110 linear feet of streams in order to
construct a pedestrian walkway on an unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek, connecting SAS Buildings U and T, in Wake
County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on January 29, 2002. After reviewing
your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3289, which
can be downloaded from our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands . This Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 14 when issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the
Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification as well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. An additional condition is that stormwater shall be directed to diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Steve Mitchell in our Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700 or Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office at 919-733-9721.
Attachments
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
George Finch, 309 N. Boylan Ave., Raleigh, NC, 27603-1402
020136
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Ken Schi,ster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name SAS/ U-T Pedestrian walkway
Project Number 02 0136
Recvd From APP
Received Date 1/29/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type pedestrian crossing
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
14 Stream O Y _@)N F- 27-45-10 FC NSW 30,404. F- 1 10.00 F_ F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: OQ Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 354916 Longitude (ddmmss) 784511
Comments:
Looks like a long stream crossing for a pedistrian walkway but it is steep .
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
EORGE FINCH/Bonev and Associates. PA
309 N. Boylan Avenue, Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27603-1402 landscape architecture
Post Office Box 10472, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605-0472 engineering
surveying
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
1.3 ?1-
Date: 29-Jan-02
To: Division of Water Quality
401/Wedands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Via: Our Messenger
Cc: Mr. Pete Flood, SAS Institute Inc.
From: George Finch, ASLAZ*
Re: SAS/U-T PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
f Ing
Items Transmitted:
Check 115569 - Submittal fee of $200.00
7 Copies - Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
7 Copies - Sheets L-1, L-2 and L-3
These items are transmitted for your approval.
Date: 1131 ??-
To: MRO Steve Mitchell
?FRO Ken Averitte
?WaRO Deborah Sawyer
?WiRO Joanne Ste=nhuis
?WSRO Jennifer Frye
?ARO Mike Parker
?MRO Pete C'olwe7
Triage Check List
Froje-.;t Name ??'S G //ll11
DWQ Project 1N ter Q a - rte/ 3
County
From: r1?? Tei=cifune (9191 733-
The file attache-` is being for ardGz' tc you fcr your evaluate- Please Cal if you rid
assistance.
? Stream length irncaz ed
? Stream determiri:_io
? Wetland determiri-=fi? and de=-c--- tc Nue-line s;r=.--ce wad rr USGIN loco maps
?Minimiz--5on/avoica-Ue issue
Buffer Rules e s= T ar-Fam li=, Casaba, Randfen. an)
? Pond fiil
? Mitiaaticn Ratics
? Ditching
? Are the stream arrf o')Ni:taz " sites ava fe and srabf=%
? Check drawings frr. @:;r y
? Is the application crsis' i -=r,?gfi?tion meetings?
? Cumulative impact errs
Comments j. w. S Q 'Dlei -4
- ---- _ ?._ __?..? - ---- --- --- -----
t/ I
_ ?...?.
-7 P"
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for AA project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
X 401 Water Quality Certification
X Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWT 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: SAS Institute Inc.
Mailing Address: SAS Campus Drive
Cary, N.C. 27513
Attn: David Webb, P.E.
Telephone Number: 919/531-7667 Fax Number: 919/677-8229
E-mail Address: david.webb a,sas.com
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SAS/U-T Pedestrian Walkway
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0775330737
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From I-40, south on Harrison
Ave.. '/a mile turn left onto SAS Campus Dr., continue 1-mile to project on right side of road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°49' 16"N and 78°45' 1 VV
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Roadway fill slope occupies one side of the stream with natural conditions (steep slope) on
the other side. Site is adjacent to office building nearing completion.
7. Property size (acres): 42.7 acres total
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Reedy Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a pedestrian walkway crossing the
subject stream in a location that will provide direct access for the occupants of SAS Building
U to the dining facilities located at SAS Building T. The directness and ease of access will
contribute to more pedestrian movement on the campus and less dependence on automobiles
to travel between buildings. The selected route was analyzed extensively to address the
elevation change from one building, down to the street and back up to the other building. thus
limiting the number of steps and any excessive slopes that would become a deterrent to the
acceptance and daily use of the walkway.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Track mounted backhoe and
front-end loader
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Owner occupied corporate headquarters
in multi-building campus setting.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
None
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
•* 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema.pov.
••' List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
Only Location Culvert 1101+/- UT/Reedy Creek 2' +/- Perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as Uf (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usias.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
)yww.mapquest. pIp, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 110'+/-
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbod
y (if
applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This location was chosen to minimize the vegetative disturbance necessary for construction. On the northeast side of
the stream, the fill slope for SAS Campus Drive extends the entire distance into the buffer and to the edge of the
stream with minimal streambank vegetation. After culvert installation, affected streambanks will be vegetatively
stabilized, and allowed to naturalize with monitoring for any subsequent erosion. Rip-rap will be placed around the
culvert inlet and at the outlet for protection from erosive stream velocities.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmmide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us?wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No X
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes X No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4680 sf (0.11 A) 3
2 1804 sf (0.04 A) 1.5
Total 6484 sf (0.15 A)
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious Area: 487.530 sfExisting _(11.2 Acres)/490,650 sfProposed (11.3 Acres)
No proposed stormwater controls.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIH. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No X
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
011V1 .02-
Applicant/Agent's- igriature v Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
GEORGE FINCH/BONEY & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
N.C. Division of Water Quality
557
/101
r,.
1/29/2002
=2921
y
WACH-CHK SAS/U-T Pedestrian Walkway
5569
200.00
200.00
REVISIONS
i

~
a...~ ~ .
9
~ e J
~I ~
do ~ ~
\ ~
a
w
/ ~ ~Q ~ vti F~7 E G ~I
BUILDING T 0 0
~ m
~ ~
~ ~ ~

o
~ ~ - ~
BUILDING U
o
~ x ~ . o
w~K A ueweweuserrew~ x ~ \
w p ? Q'+
4 ea reuse ~ ~ W 0 41 ~ a9 ar owo (,y (y ~
4 z ~ ~
° c ~
0 o wave eor. aRVer,.:::. G'~ ~ ~ o ~ . ~
o ea eueeMer cows 0 0 . wuseaaiereoulnwr 0 0
ea reuse e,,r~ea 0 0
? way ca.rrrr BoN. eur~sr o
rf o ,
~ ~ ~
i.
Z
e~~ ii
100 rE~e RMI7r 8ll11'Qt UBOB 8L1.eil1~' 8((~AM .
v
...::'A?K'..~
wasoamreo~arrvuer I N ~e~ Li.
vI 7 l/'^)
v ~
I DC
~ wMe! COIrRY 801E 8UHlY ¢t~~,,j11 n i n r,~yl
1 N ~pR r,
( asses O ~i
irri : ~ i ~N fr yi ,.rJ I . i ~ . J ~ ' ' f~ff ~ °y
I • W T C> i
: 1'n :•J~ ~y' ~ `
' _ wMslp01MTI0LeJMM •
M, FiN
1 ~ , f..1
I i
I .
aoo o aoo eoo ~ _ °---i _ PREt.IMINARY
con~ru~. sip rx.av
DRAWN BY CN~2
nn n~ ~rnurn e'fv /N IC
t,ntt,ntu of "vw
PROJECT NO. 98026.01 SAS CAMPUS
SCALE IN FEET L-I 1' • 400' DATE 14 MC, 2001
SHEET

REVISIONS
I
r ~
r
~ ~ ~
C'~~S\ ~ 1
G I ~
~
r ` I ~ ti
~ ~ ~ ~
~,~1
~ -
1
\ ~
~ ~
3a5 -------..~J
\ 3BQ -
~ ~
315 \
~
~ f
33S Leo
I I i III ) m.'/ / ~ , a \ ~ ~
. ti
~ ' ti
~ \ ~ A.
~ ~ ~ \
\ ~ ~ ~ \
~
~ ~ A ~ ~ ~V~ \ ~
o
\ , ~ ~ m ~
. ~
\ y ~ ~ z
~ ~ ~
\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ U
~ , ~ ~ \ ~ r-
~ \ O ~ as a
t o~
~ z
~ i \ ~ \ ~ a
~ \ ~ ~ x ~ ~ c~ ° c~ ~
~ z ~ ~o ~ x ~ O ~
~ti,~~~ cti M ~
¢ , , , ~ \ \ ~
\ ~
~ ~ \ ~ .
~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ ` ~ ~ ` \
~ \
~ ~ ~ ti ~
\ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Z
.W
OC
~ ~ ~ ~ \ti~,
u> \ \ \ s 0 ~ Q
a 0
c~
~ s ~
~ ~c
III I'~ J ~~~I' ~ / it ~ ~6 © E...
cn z
cn
-
o~
O ~ cn cn
~ ~~~~~plnlnrlRyl~f~
v,"~y~ C~~yyy
,,\~q~~i ~Bd9Y~{ip~~• ~ ~I, 1 'A V~ (J i~ r~
i; Q C~u ~~~p ~~Rp,~i~ y T
e ~Y iw`~ f N 7) A
~ r ~ ~i
i O 0 eJ~~ ~y'~~1~ ~ ~ +v
I~I~ Y ~~hYliY~~~~~ ~ (q
~ ~I . ~ ~ '`/1111111 > > ,
PRELIMINARY
so o so ioo CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
~I noel wu Qv ~-,u~
VIN1,1\ VI V11~
CHECKED BY GMF
BLDG U AND T PROJECT NO. 98026.01
L-2 I- - 5CY DATE 14 DEC, 2001
iu u
SCALE IN FEET L-2
SHEET

REVISIONS
380
3~,

370
8~
360
a
w
rQ~/~
Vi
t
8 8 ~ ~
350 ~o
O U
~~P'S
~aZ 5 Z o
aZ pgaN
o~ z~
SL ~ axM
3~, ~ o~~ ~ ~
O ~ an ~
w o
C'3 M
340
0
z
.W
DC
330
D
W O
(L ~ _ D[
1-
to z
_
~c cn cn
cn cn
320
ao 0 o r a n ~ ,,,~,~,~N BAR .l ~ . Y ~ ;~q~e~~~6,y®b 9ti0CP0~0 ~ I
hl ~ M !ry . ~ M ~ ~ ~ M ~ re
tl'.~~4 Y1° ~~~P y C. q
r'~'` a ~r 9 ~
0+O(? 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+03 C.~ eA 4 e m wt f+~y n y o~ ~ ` ~
rf ~ 'aarev~rad
~~~~E7UNl1 ~
PR~.IMINARY
coNC~TUaJ. slr~ ~.alv
scaLE, DRAWN BY CM?
VERTICAL I' - 4' CHECKED BY GMF
HORIZONTAL 1"- 20' PROPOSED PROFILE PROJECT NO. 98026-01
HM 0' VMT I. , 4 DATE 14 DEC, 2001
IL1 1z r •2
SHEET