310404_Corrective Action Letter_20190319

Mr. Mike Kennedy
185 Turkey Branch Road
Beulaville NC 28518
April 29, 2019
David Powell
NCDEQ
127 North Cardinal Drive
Wilmington,NC 28405
Subject: Corrective Action Letter
Dear Mr. Powell:
RECEIVED/NCDENROR
MAY 0 3 2019
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
This letter is in reference to corrective actions taken for the (1000 gallon) discharge that was discovered
on Wednesday April 24.
The reason for the discharge was as a result of doing some sludge maintenance on my lagoon. We had
some of the sludge to leave the field boundaries.
The following items are actions that were taken or being considered to prevent this kind of discharge
from happening again:
• There was an attempt to identify and slow the viscous material from the current path toward the
branch. We noticed that the material flowed slowly and formed a light crust on the surface.
• We hired Agriment Services to help us follow protocol as a result of this incident
• Samples were collected per my current permit for the required parameters and rushed to the
Waters Lab in Warsaw to fulfill my sampling requirements.
• We notified the local paper of this incident.
s3-uoao L-,r4S 0.7'SUP0 in)
In the past, I have not had any problems with my farm. I really do not have the budget to pay a potential
fine as I have just removed some sludge from my lagoon and hired a consulting firm to help me with this
incident leaving my budget depleted. We intend to do a better job monitoring land application events.
1 would ask that you copy Agriment Services on any future correspondence that results from this incident.
If you need additional information please feel free to contact me at the above address.
Sincerely,
Mike Kennedy

RECEIVED/NCDENR/M
MAY 0 3 2019
Water Quality Regional
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste lWiatignss io
�alOffice
04-15-2019
This plan has been prepared for
Mike Kennedy Farm (31-404)
Mike Kennedy
185 Turkey Branch Road
Beulpville, NC 28518
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with
This plan has been developed by:
Ronnie G. Kennedy Jr.
Agriment Services, Inc.
PO Box 1096
Beulaville, NC 28518
252-5
loper Signature
ure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
J. (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal -waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) al_�
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This elan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
AaG.•eei�'hl.•n _'VA*fit ran 1. Re-gvp•eec r•n...sp'v?f^nn Sp-v:cp o- a'.e sip' p"d nF
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By
c'alist Signature Late
245400 Database Version 4.1
Date Pirated: 04 15-2019 ,Cover Page I

ANIMAL WASTE DISCHARGE REPORTED IN DUPLIN COUNTY
Beulaville, NC - Kennedy Facility 31-404 in Beulaville NC had an animal waste
discharge on 4/24/2019 of an estimated 1000 gallons from the Spray Fields. The
discharge may have affected an unnamed tributary to Gum Branch in the NE Cape
Fear River Basin.
The N.C. Division of Water Resources was notified of the event on 4/24/2019 and
is monitoring the incident.
1,ME
S'l&�>l-1-r-rb�0 4 —SO -/q

"WAT RS IC RAL`:
Waters Agricultural Laboratories, Inc.
Microbiological Analysis Report
P.O. Box 382 * 257 Newton Highway* Camilla, Georgia 31730-0382 * Phone: [phone]
Report No: GA19-29650MB-1
AGRIMENT SERVICES
PO BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
Test
Fecal Coliform Solid Matrix
Grower: MIKE KENNEDY
SampleNumber: Lagoon Received Date: 04/30/2019
Lab Number: 29650 Report Date: 05/02/2019
Sample Type: Lagoon Sample Date/Time: Not Provided
Value Units Analysis Method
9,000.0 mpn/ml SM 9221E
Results Reported On: w=wET(AS RECEIVED)BASIS
Remarks:
Reviewed by:
Data Administrator
This document may be reproduced only in its entirety. Waters Agricultural Laboratories has no control over the manner in which samples are
taken, therefore, analysis is based solely on the sample as received. Lab liability is limited to the fee assessed on the referenced sample.
Unless otherwise noted, sample was received in good condition.
Reviewed Date: 05/02/2019 Page 1 of 1

Wattral Laboratories, Inc,
WA liquid Manure/Sludge
Analysis and Application Report
364 West Park Drive Warsaw, NC 28398 [phone] FAX [phone]
Ship To:
AGRIMENT SERVICES, INC
PO BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
Grower: MIKE KENNEDY
SampleNumber:
Lab Number: 92021 MS
Date Submitted: 4/26/2019
Report Date: 5/2/2019
Type: Lagoon Sludge Anaerobic -Swine Application Method: Broadcast
Test
Nitrogen - Total
PPM
840
lbs. per 1000 gal.
1.01
Estimate of Nutrients AN ailable
For First Crop- I bs/1000 gal.
3.50
Ammonia Nitrogen
672
5.60
5.60
Nitrate Nitrogen
32,2
0.27
.27
Phosphorus
110.44
0,92
92
P205 - Total
253.07
2.11
2.11
K20 - Total
732.49
6.11
6,11
Sulfur
86.12
0.72
.72
Boron
0.84
0.01
01
Zinc
837
0.07
.07
Manganese
1.67
0.01
.01
Iron
24.47
020
.20
Copper
5.14
0.04
.04
Calcium
152.97
1.28
1.28
Magnesium
98.9
0.82
.82
Sodium
163.92
1.37
1.37
Aluminum
6.44
0.05
.05
Results Reported On: L=LIQUID BASIS
Remarks:
This document may be reproduced only in its entirety. Waters Agricultural Laboratories has no control over the manner in which samples are
taken, therefore, analysis is based solely on the sample as received. Lab liability is limited to the fee assessed on the referenced sample.

MMo3
;
\
(2L
y
\
0 03 1
@
\ 3,
{
\\-3
}
)22
n
(3S'
\
\-Z4
_
§§§2
%
E0
!f!|
\\\-
�\\\
f
Sze
o
!
220
)
,
§7&
4
f
amp
2
/\
§
/!
\(}
s
�\\
Ri
3
(
02
\w
\\\
.\
\
Er z
o
co
77
�z}
(
#
/
/
>
(
(\
}
/
{
E
«
>
(
\
\
\
\
(
;
\)$,
}
§
\

cn
�
�\
\
\�
\((
@
0\\
3
§
�\
«
>
0
■
=
f
\
°
2 y
{
{
/
T
f
{ ;
2
«
}
>
2
!
2
2)
\\
\CD
CD 0
°
�/
E(
\\
\G}
_
(
{ }
0
{ j

)
\
\�
\(\
\\(
\0
0
\({
�z\
y

§
}R
G
\\
3
)
f{t
/
\\\
\
\�\
^\
01
/
\ }41,
§
(

!!J3
I2�! 2
$!|! k y
3
\a \ §
§$!7 \
�(\}
J§J)
3 3 m o
3-Qm
E%!2
!i!(
,}§\
!E#:
\7!»
§$0
() C
N—® 0 (
®\& ! \
§�' ® �
a3 (!
\ \
\\
\�
Lo
%
s
§\
}2
/((
s
R\\
Cal)
m
(
§
0
�
(
)\\
\(/
co
161
cn
2
2
�
\
}
a \
/
{
}
0
CD
zi
§
12
i
(
(

e$ �
`
y
�
10
O L
St
!
Y
;
�f2;
}{ J
%
G
i2
R
§!
!
\

FORM IRR•2
Trac
Field Sot (matted acres)
Farm Own
Owners AMM
0"nr Phom
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
I rdpalton Oporawr
frrlga(ion Operators
Addross
operators Ptrone a
Fadtlly Nvmher s .
From Waste Ulllizallon Plan
Crop Type C O� 1 Recommended PAN
7 L Loedng(lo(acre).(a} 1 1
fit (21 131 1.l
Lagoon
10
'
Date
fmMY411"]
•.•
it eflan
for V1 fsJ
(a)
Waste Anal sir
PAN- Y
Qh()a lCAI)
(10)
PAN Arpllad
(81x(9}
1100000
(11}
Nitrogen
Balaneo
[ISHln)
u_
Weathor
Code'
Stem
Timo
End
Tima
Total
Minas"
(5)-(2J
11 of
Sprinktors
Or»rating
Flow
Role
(gal/min)
Total Wrtsmo
(gallons)
(a)x(5)x{4)
Ve(ume
per ACIe
(oavacro)
(()!(A)
miftls a
{Initials}••
ts-
G
ba
a C7
ti° a
b• �f.
b'
O s
i
o
�t
o 5/
13 tt
Crop Cycle Iotafs -
Total PAN
Operator's Slpnaurrg-_�_____
CeRfed Operator(Print) Operator Cerlifcalion JI
Weather Codes: C-Clear. PC -Party Cloudy, Cl-CJoudV. R-Rain, S-SnowtSleel. W-Windy
Pemns rx)mpteling Illn ir6gA(inn insprktionS nui51 dQtiol to si(fllify HIM ilr_R N,ti{inns uvro cxip dehaf nit rn;ca evory 120 mfiunes.

�&
!
\ i
�
\
\
&
2|
.
\
\
-
0,0
-.
�4
}!!
\{\
�
. a
A
\
\(
it
!!
|
f
f
!�§
!
\•§
o
ƒ(
}\■
i
f
\

PoRm Ftal r••
Waste tu+e Frstcsa W?ysniiic�r+
Farm
"`"""�""'� i 'PrscipRation j "'�• 3
Date -,Waste Stricture fr _
(mrridW/y'i
3 _
r"�a
t --
1._.._,._,
1
...«a—...,, �...«,...—.mom..
{
i-T4
----------
i. t.EQtJf7rl f7e8bck3d 18 "it#0 r�tff2rer109 betw"n ttx: NNKab'f pphzt of a ieaoon elnbankmerrl and trts 1Ebel Of ii'luld.
FK.jr legoons 4t' mrltways, the dlflerence between Me level ai liquid aw ttNR boitoln of the sWilway ahoutd be n^vorded-
?. t r•sperafd *0 avaiRable storage ca#tats ty rnuat ba racorSad of least waeury,
aAl.,lali ro�ac+he r.r oiod far evaiv rab{ event. '2/{itd"19

Fom FROD-1 DOY Pro.,A�00011. Rem rd
f 06
Nklawa[L
Farm Owner
D nerd and ft lever (if liquio.
dWaTOTM b8twe0r` the f0wes' Pohl' of 0 lagoon embankment
Jon I - —,
fir jagoon., Ti. 0111ways, the difference t*-,wean flea lava, of ficpid and bottom of the soilway all-Ouid be
FfeBpoditt pNw available storage capaifty must be recorded of 16aA weekly.
he r.�,nrfiAd far 0V ,v r8o) W-ennt.

FoRPA FftsD- r
Faml owr t
Dpomor
0
West@ ftucture Ftoo ,fj son
! 7�1 �Ut-........____._.�
�---�kM1°asi2 Stricture Frs�t3sr_iuu:i�>f�_�_cR_ J '€'rs�al�tinn
M. Fay
't. lagoon Imeb -W i s #W diiterence between ttae bweb? PMnt of a. fegvon elnbankr* el# and ifs fcvet of liquid.
F<irf tegoona 11, sn/ihvays, the difference bMiwsen fha ievot at liquici artd tna _odor of the Witway stxwid be ra ;oexfetl.
?. FreabE?wd Ffua AVailiWe storage c,Pr-Gty trust be ranxded at 18,E-4 weekly.

Farm Ow;,i
op weator
J"
D
?t c##iPti£ii3��f� I ` "^ySJS�Jy7es
L.l�/�
i
'Waste SYnictum Frp*t are tf�r1'.ss1 _ _ 4 Tr-aciplaiinn
i ag ion ir$ei t.is! #ra 7itterence b - ---- a -- -
ellween the V)Vest aohu of a leocmn emoankmeM and tfaa ?-Yer of iiquid.
FDr tagoona fih eoFlhvays, the Wflerenw h lsysen tt^a /e'vetW (iGa:id 2ttyY t'le _oCutn o! Me sFtilRasq s!mcritl be r.�rardec}.
? F7aat?f?ald ¢nGs a'veilable storage Gaaa'Aty must be m-a,wded at least week€q.

A
D
3 3
3
0
0
N
3 n
3
p C.
3
GC
aDo- nos a°
8 o
S. r C r'
N
ur
"
w 2`WPM�A/N,T
W Cc
e
ri+ias riwns"
'm
a
Y
0
y
N
O
q
< N
O
z z F 4
� 3 m Z
Z Z on.
Z 3
p
N
,V
N
�
;u TT
Z
Z
C
T
O
J
ID
\V
O
�
N
�
V Z
w
rj
o
�
—
d
V
n N
N
m0
Z
N
Q n
W
�y
ram}
A
A Ip1
_
;o
ID
N� S
N
n
n
p
M
Ol m
�
1h
ry'
10
N
O
v
W y
(DD
ti
O
T
d
3
9
>
O co
a
N¢
ca'
T
j
#
v`
<,
W
w
O
G
3
O
Z� N
CU
C
N
J
2 f7
o
e n�'—�
N
p
m
N
w 2
m
o
N
0
O
O
N
`
ro m
rn `
m
J
�
-i W
O
W m
N
n
a
n
o
3
o
Z
O
to
eoI
w D
N
l
o Z
C
N
o
�
y
o
rn

-v
-
!
$
.
.�.
E2tE�P�
ƒ|oz
i0 c)
! f
¥
F
i
Cr.~
y^`
m- t
°
i&
@
z
R
z
}
'
o x 0
;
;Z;.
/
- Zz
( z
a
;
O
m
»%
B
§0
■
,CA
/0
0
`
\
§2
CD
'¢0
®2\
_
\
�
f
®
,
;
v
$
In
�
(72&&
|
0--
0
\
\\�
.!
./;�
&
, n
a
7
..
g
PC
;!(
K
§�(
°
z
£
=
)
\�
\
I
-
/

V
°
�
y
U o a o
n 3 •'• N
m F
g N
O
2c.nva�rn,.
'''x,s nnnca
C V
C N
N
O
G
C
O
z z = o o
0?'a
ZZ;
g9 z
-Z
n �
m
�
Z Z
2
C
T
T
ry
�
o z
0
�thV
d
O V
ee
i
W
C
W
u
°:
3
N
N
o
W
w
a
O
3
.3
0} .� to
N
3
3n
o
a n
J
w
m
[O ci
ST
7
O O
NP
O 3
d
N
ti
t0
t
O
C
m N=
A
tC
w m
o cn
A
�I
p
0
O
<
N_
C A
3
con
Z� m
3
_
co a
O N
N
o N
S
O
o
m
0 m
N
a
m
n
p
o Co
o
p WFL
m
a
m
», n -
o
o
z
o
v
D
O
N
O
ufDi
(D
O
c
�Dm
o
mz
m
P
N
� z c
n
W N N
0
9D
t°_
N
o
n
VO
A
W

fl
N
2 N
C N
a S
ao
V
m
A
OOi
=
N
3e
A
N
n
r' d
VI T
N
A
A
O
=
0
N
0
N
r'
M
=
d
W
m
O
N
'E
O
N
de
A
M
Z
m
�
r
Y,
y
N
m
y
N
Laseex nremr
$ �
�
O G
<
T C
0
W
N
O
O
N -a 0
N Jnm
NJ 0
v
EL
r
a
o 0
3
A m
3"
m m y
3
b�
n
m
n
m
0
a
'
3
'
m
d
�
m m
m
O
v
C
Ut
2
Z
O
O
N
Z
N
N N
O
N
Z
d
N N
N
to
2
J
i
p
a
�
O
N
to y
N
O W
ry
O V
m
O N A
A
IS
9
L
O
V
p
N
n
w
O
a a
m
m
o
Z
'w
c
o
c
Z
m
°1E
;
00
w
01
2E
o Z
co
,�
�o
a
ooz
{o o
oo°<_
p'
o
AL
0
O O O
O O O
O O O
O
d
3
0 00
0
N
C n Co
O
O O�
3
O O�
Z
w
O'
N
Z
V
Z
D
0
ry
5i
No
~
?
V W 2
N
D
n
O O N
Q
N
N
D_
n
N Vt N
Q
N
V
n
O y
N
N
A
H
N
i3z
N
Q
N
A
N
N
N
O O
cog
01
m
=
D
D
o oN
W
D
o oN
0
..
c
0)
1
O O C
L
O O C
W
L
O O C
a
rq'
O
O
d
O
Y
O
L
v
N
mm
N
N
N
co
9
O
Z
'0
'0
9
Z
O
_
L
ic
O
L
O
b
e
e
c
O
'
O
°
O
'
O
O
Z
Z
Z
N

Facility Number FE__1 - bl
Visit: V Compliance
for Visit: O Routine
A Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Evaluation
O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I q
l l Arrival Time:A0 Departure Time: onnty: D �(� Region: '1/ X D
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: (_4,1) Ve#A,ykl 44 (t"e4- j-,
Certified Operator: 4k)
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
to Finish
to Feeder
to Finish
v to Wean
v to Feeder
v to Finish
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon -
Layers
Non -Layers
Pallets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
KYes No 0 NA NE
Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
] Yes ONo ❑ NA ONE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Ej Yes ,-�( No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ly No NA 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes (�+j7jNo NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of x 4 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA IXI NE
maintenance or improvement? T°
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
�I Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
j�''�
11. I there evidence of c r t land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift V Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
LA NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
E
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑LeaseAgreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 4 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes
[—]No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1)(NF,
[—]Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA 0 NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessarv).
W� ark � '' MW N) , �KjArL(cj, ,b-A hD ftM& Q,vt�i WQf
leave A 01LI YAA'�. cW C-Wm 4k\t (�W e, C'bAATAC+rr) ajAA 4 KA0_4
us ak iLQ 3:�5. dn��e uS Cu uv� �;dds WVvk was
o lied �l��d a� lud es rda� aid BhII pl��h 4 v4kave us
�t(WMSV)M 'b WAV 4k �A*1_6�m as arl�'f-lie air�� hje.
Y r-(�,mo a D API cd f� Co� �'n utij�L i lw(� t
I (�fn -1b ctd ke �e I a ► CU' 1 basks N art ,
,�
WAMA 111' CcIS � Wil � al
e a bs vc� �uc� p� s c(�anM a+ `� � aGl s�
o� Y Y4�e ► Vvh t A GYD.S� l a 4 - I o f m . m, w'd baCk -la -44 l - ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3O ty�
Phone: % Ell u -7 0
Date:
21412014

Facility Number: ...............—............ Date of Inspection:
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
-appl; el` . hre ebseVVcj e pdnded ►y, -n-mmodsa�-�l->e, 4
WA -IV) r'Lhn+ rn af `iP de
(�,td +- avJ , a d aje. sa N3� ics S'oo m.
Weals, l�
� i� P 1(14Z 4-N k4dr -tH dvG1h P �
Yr�d -W '
�S"s>tir�ct el, wk" 4 elms /reop�eo,6 a4 etta , LC
P p1 cs + en @ 0 ,�Dfm. okvvd sus isluto�e- 16 -;-
JIU Vh4em -ire Mf *vv &,Ids (AJd
r ics -k C wltiarc dl 4 604eX ire "4ds. D b ervid W vifal a,eaJ
WIC f J was rRan41� ' � � vwf die fd (�J Z) .
w 4lto 4 a� PA of Ad 4k wands - 7S-Ivo Yds
� a.e 10r
�2 if ; 55 V S �heQM 44 P �
�, C ssid.e q-P -farmk,U�oudcs�. cSt k�
fur, U s oT LAnk W tr
Gl, a rl t,e 1 i W BrM4 NoAed 6-mo ftla� w� to(
�h� s �� {'UYII? 1►2� vr� Lit ar,d 4-Aa4 -11/2
I�un -f c rm ti 1' 30 r m alld d opped P 4L
t i Pia .
swve Taw all � ,�,N� � a
lv>S�I �(m will �k fed �, MW / Wk (,4,
ion M-14�1A Z Lf Izs 111 /NI,
4/30/97

N.C. DIVISION OF. WATER QUALITY
Water Quality Section
Complaint/Emergency Report Form
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Received bV D42c`j .
Emergency Complaint
Report Received
+'S3e�C-u���
Phone
Phone
1-r
Check One: _Fish Kill Spill Bypass Animal NPDES N.D.
_Stormwater Wetland Other,
cohN-,
t.ce
Time and Date
Location otArea
Surface Waters Impacted Classification
Other Agencies
Investigation
SAWQSISHELLSIREPORT. SHL
EPA Region IV [phone] Pesticides 733-3556 Emergency Management 733-3867 Wildlife Resources 733.7291
Solid and Hazardous Waste 733-2178 Marine Fisheries 726-7021 Water Supply 733.2321 Coast Guard MSO 343-4881
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 0 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]

Environmental mist
nanl-110m1Pi.lrl `1 1Ai, -nmiino3t7u, tA-i.\e24(� kk 9i'_l t' ^24371W,
n '4 4
1mfntn �Jg,hw,i% lit, ti 4i iFm ANALYTICAL& CCNSUDING CHEMISTS ir, rn,i eny IF, IT men uilJtern I' I, zom
NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: May 13, 2019
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #:
Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049
Attention: Michael Merlinger Report #: 2019-06611
Project ID: 31404
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time
Matrix Sampled by
19-16715 Sli,e t�,,_
4/24/2019 4:00 PM
Water Michael Meilinger
b tow N"`t'
_ u1
LA
Date Analyzed
Test
Method
Results
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM45DDNH3 C
11.7mg/L 04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM45000rgB
11 9 mg'L 05/02/2019
Fecal Coliform
SM 9222D PAF
1090 Colonies/1004L 04/24/2019
�ab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time
Matrix Sampled by
19-16716 Si-
4/24/2019 4:10 PM
Water Michael Mellinger
Test above OAN4 N
Ln Method
Results Date Analyzed
Q140 VC Ur
h Cst`
Fecal Coliform
SM 9222D MF
8 Colon ie,,410mL 04/24/2019
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect DatelTime
Matrix Sampled by
19-16716A Sit
4/24/2019 4:10 PM
Water Michael Meilinger
Test
Method
Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen SM4500NH3 C 8.92mg/L 05/13/2019
Lab ID Sample ID:
19-16716AA Si�
Test Method
Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
4/24/2019 4:10 PM Water Michael Mellinger
Results Date /
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM45000rgB 14.9mg/L 0611312019
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
19-16717 4i24/2019 5:00 PM Water Michael Mellinger
Test l�K �GW Method Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen SM450DNH3 C 75.9mg/L 04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM45000rgB 178mg/L 05/02/2019
Fecal Coliform SM92222DMF K'OOColonie 00mL 04/2412019�
Report 9.' 2019-066' 1 , 43

Environmental Chemists, Inn.
1 660'_ 1vindmill lFnv V111mins ti,n. AC 'U: _c: w:: _4-4
510 Boy, ertolrn Bo-:1. A1antc \C "mot _, 11.1
_1g-a Nihnm,h>N High1� :v SC '. �40 - u7. ,a-{. I _i
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS infan nip n<nn'rranir!rei:u>;..s!rr.
NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: May 13, 2019
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PC #:
Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049
—Attention-Michael Merlinger- - Report #: ---- 2019-06611
Project ID: 31404
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
19-16718 Site 4/2412019 5:30 PM Water Michael Meilinger
Test Ih � isck (Method Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen rU In 450O NH3 C 93 4 mg/L 04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Shl4503Org e 134 mg/L 05/02/2019
Fecal Coliform SM 9222D MF t33000 Colonies/100mLT 0412412O19
WD Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
19-16719 Sit 4i2412O19 6.00 PM Water Michael Meilinger
Test�OW el ol;llr '714 Method Results _ Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen SM4500NH3 C 701mq/L 04i30/2O19
Fecal Coliform SM 9222D MF 49O0 Colonies/16U'h1IJ4/24/2019
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
19-16719A Site— 4124/2O19 6:00 PM Water Michael Meilinger
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM45ecorga 137 mg/L 05/07/2019
Lab ID Sample ID:
19-16720 r Sit
Test )"
Collect DatelTime Matrix Sampled by
4/24/2019 6:40 PM Water Michael Meilinger
Method Results Date Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM4500 NH'C
11.7 mg/L
04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SKI45co org e
35.7 mg/L
05/0212019
Fecal Coliform
SKI 922213 MF
4/24/2019
Rep.- w 2019-06W+ Pace 2 of 3

Environmental
Chemists,
Inc.
ANALYTICAL& CONSULTING CHEMISTS
NCDENR-DWR Date of Report: May 13. 2019
127 N. Cardinal Drive Ext. Customer PO #:
Wilmington NC 28405 Customer ID: 09010049
Attention: Michael Merlinger Report #: 2019-06611
Project ID: 31404
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Tune Matrix Sampled by
19-16721 Site: sample 7 4/24!2019 6:55 PM Water Michael Meilineer
��nf
Test t4Y_ -1 cc,PcLM U Method Results Date Analyzed
._LL,i�AS�
Ammonia Nitrogen L V J
SM4513NH3 C
11.7mg/L
04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM45DOOga
181 mq!L
05/02/2019
Fecal Coliform
SM9222DMr
OColonies/100TL
04/2412019
Lab ID Sample ID:
Collect Date/Time
Matrix Sampled by
19-16722 W/
41124/2019 7:10 PM
Water Michael Meilinger
�j'GfFGY1
Test UuWI
Method
Results Date
Analyzed
Ammonia Nitrogen O hiG[C�)
SM 4503 NH3 c
5.84 mq/L
04/30/2019
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
SM4533O'g E
128 mg1
05/02/2019
Fecal Coliform
SM 9222D MF
` ILO Co;onies1 fllL
0 !24/2019
Comment:
Reviewed by: ,.
Re,-olt

m
FL
I I
A
�
I
o'
TI
a
�3
m
Sampl•
Typo
Compoello
n�
Gi
C)
G).
C-)
or
-
Grab
0
U.
G
7)
G)
Conteinor
IP or G)
v
n
�
Chlorin.
mglL
NUMBER
NONE
HCL
H2504
A
M
m
A
HNO3
A
<
NAOH
1
a
O
CDTHro
Z
OTHER
n
z
r
O
m
o
m
LILL-'
a
I
Z
X
O
Z
9
m
Z
D
fir\
J
m
9
N
N

Q� �d zl1g
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31-404 County Duplin
Facility Name. Mike Kennedy Farm
Certified Operator Name: Mike Kennedy Operator Number AWA17236
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP-
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of wasteas conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Mike Kennedy Phone: [phone]
acility Owner/Manager (print)
Ci '1 V—Y Date: 8/1/2018
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 1798.4 lit. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1389 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

J
U
,x
L
Z
K
uj w
�D
C1
�\p
v`
1_
O
Z
a
XX
Q
Z
a
C
\
d
gw
Z
z
O
�
ui
~
O
w
d
O
U
w
K
O
U
Q
S
3
L
fA
rn
w
m
a
U
o
Q
o
�
�-
w
p
N
4,
a
—lam
N
a
I
2
tl3N10
O
OIN1
pm
l
QNOUN
�
QONN
W
)
1
a
E�OSCN
llN
3N ON
M3eWnN
al evl
E
S
lf6w
5
aupolg3
,aulalu0'3 `
No
(9
a
(9
�a
a
C9
a
(9
0
(9
a
0
O
qa,•J
+o
V
U^
U
(9
U
U'
U
CO
U`
olPodwoo
\
adA,L
gdwag
m
d
�
F-
r
N
C
1
1
`�^
�
O
0
~
csi
`
w
c
0
(J
M
�~
C
q
f
N
m
C
E
d o
0 U

("ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other
Date of Visit: �ZT VArrival Time: 9 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:t
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Owner Email:
Phone:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Denied Access
Region:
Certification Number: 1 t '- _? 6
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
W n to Feeder
ender to Finish
,.7
io
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes . o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: ';I - k(_0 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural Freeboard?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): d�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes_.E]lTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�i Io—
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ED&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[:I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE /
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q ICE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Numbe;: Date of inspection:
24. Did thq facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [i]'1Voo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
list structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [31q_o O NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ " ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3'No— ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�' Imo 1 ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
iO
/ �- / p�
et, -Yt n x�/_ �� C � ' � ( o-, k S
o t-_R
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
4!fo'— c PO/-�O'- ct /t
Phone: In —/ 730cl
Date:
21412015

-26 Ab
31 q-()
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 31404 County: Duplin
Facility Name: Mike Kennedy Farm
Certified Operator Name: Mike Kennedy Operator Number: AWA17236
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches): 14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the desig
tructures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Actii
Ct i��/t
, . _ Q
are
within acceptable ranges.
00
l —Z�e-
X Liquid level is within the 25 y
ires. A
30 day Plan of Action is attar
Waste is to be pumped and
31
/ v
-nt of waste
to be pumped and hauled i<
)tan is a list
of the proposed sites with r
ing crop
information. Contact and s
aste to a site
not covered in the facility's
Operation will be partially u, , ,,, _ _, .
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding anima, epopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility numuer, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Mike Kennedy Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/ anager (print) I
Date: 9/18/2018
Facility caner/Manager (signature)

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 843 0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -416 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

)�C)06 0,5W
I0-2-3-18
31- V-0y
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number. 31404
Facility Name: Mike Kennedy Farm
Certified Operator Name: Mike Kennedy
County: Duplin
Operator Number: AWA17236
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Name/ID:
Spillway(Y or N):
Level(inches):
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
`if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Mike
Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/ anager (print)
Date
FacilityOwner/Manager (signature)
t3`� Doti-- k`p
9/18/2018

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 843.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -416 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit If line y does not show as a deficit list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

3 i-qoq
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S8
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge waste generated 484,000 gals in a 7 year(s) and 4
month(s) period by a 2,000 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Sludge operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated
Broadcast
4940
Incorporated
5928
Injected
5928
Irrigated
4940
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs)*
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
4,940
5435
-495
532,515
-48,515
(,1 0„y".2�yS�1S
�tnr4tY flQ"Hookro—
`�� c6wi Wnk lh .. +4w �
I wt S jl�
eat
• Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis or the a,
639201 Database Version 4.1 1
a
s source.

0 C
O '-
N
A L
i0 •- T � U
a °
C � N tC fC
L C_
3
v
E o E v
tb
Y C
N o `Av 0 °
.O N _
° a a
E N •$
T
L
G @ C N
c0
E
� :U O � v
L.,
o c E A Q
c L
E o
O
N� C� P •o � w
0E
y n � E v 0
w E >,
.� A O d
E o c c •y �
N O U V
r N O 0 A
-
v` O E w O t
n
A N E ° '$
n o o v •r �
•• to O «
v n
aJ N
3 c o o
g
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
9 rL,•
P
OJ
N
b
P
m
b
r
r
N
N
H
O
VN1
...•
S
pp
•0
O
r
P
N
OG
P
N
b
Gc
.6
N
O
CO
q
v �' 8
�a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
c
c
c
c
c
fay
,
c
o
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
A
o
0
0
0
a
a
O
O
O
V
6
V
a y
V
p Q
O
N
O
CO
M
d
O
b
O
M
O
W
m
M
M
M
M
W
A
Z
IO
O
2
o
e
o
0
0
2
eg
F
u z Ga
U F y
�$_'� $a
2
o
c
�
m
o
o
•Po
�
e
�
�
v1
N
vi
vi
vi
N
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
O
M
G '�=
G g
P
O�
P
P
O•
P
O•
P
P
O.
P
<
v
o
o
v
e
n
n
n
n
in
�
vl
N
V�
N
N
N
vl
N
N
N
vl
N
N
V1
h
h
h
Q
Q
2
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
a
0
V
>
V
>
V
a.
V
�.
V
D9
V
.
0
AT
W
.
x
0
S
A
A
A
l0
>
>
7
T
T
T
T
T
0
T
T
T
T
T
to
N
V)
rA
N
N
S
2
2
x
S
�
-
6
o
V
—
F G
V
VI
V
V
V
V
b
V
V
V
V
�
Q
G
o
1 3
f1
<
Q
Q
<
<
Q
Q
b
Y p
.
w
m
w
m
w
.
.
.
m
w
� LL
0
�
o
0
0
0
•O
o
m
n
�
�
C

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
639201 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 4/15/2019 Specification Page 2

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
639201 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 4/15/2019 Specification Page 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral Soil, low -leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3, 7, 8
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book' and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for IS" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2 and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 Ibs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
639201 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 04-15-2019 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

ra
c
0
c

Z C r O n
O O .O N a
0
° n n acn
fT`n
o
r fi
o p fn
n 3
s
o
�
y m
a
o
r
iY
Z Z a o o
O?
O
N
m y
z
m
c
a
y
m
c
—
j
Z
o
Z
y
CD
o
�
o
+
O
C
m
c
N �
(n
n
3
� f
l
n m
A m 5
m
m
c
N Z
Q
O � �
7
D
0
in
0
0
O
O
N a
Q
N
O
CD

Cl c n W v y
v v v v Z
z
z N n `� to D_ f
`m avi -moo c
F
n.
a m o �. m
FD
D
o
o r o n
0
cD v F v v '�
v o
N
D r
o
O
3
o R1 o? m 0
a m
II
O O Q to
0
v
J
v
n w
�
D
n o
m
°
n v m
o
o
a G o
x v O
N
<
N
N
N
m
�. N
N
a°
0°
d N
(D
N
m
-
3
a cn -o =—'. m
z o
m
0
y
m
_
a
A
F
w
-
O
c
m F es-
v Din d
�
m
O
ry
i0
o
p�
m T a
ry
N
O
O
A
O
9
3
onom WND
91 natO
3
0
n
II II 11 II II II II
O
n n D D
0
v
y w o n c
3
m y m
m
zZ 333TTcl
� o -�N
II II II II II II II II
�2
I, � � d m
''
Z
N
O O O
(�
N
N N-0 T z
m �
I,I o c o
O- 2
I�
a
E-T
II II II II II II II
'I � �
"I
2
Cl) (f) r T Z Z D
n
O
¢p
'
I
Z
N
m
i
I
N
N

A
m Z
I o I
o C a 0 o
m
"T-
m F cn o A
o
(n
3
a 3
co
°
r
x
z z
m
a
m
c
—
ill
O
j
i
w
N
^
N
d
A �
W
O
u)
O
!
1
(n m
3
°J
N �
J ^.
N
A N
A
Q
n
A mA -

0 C 0 W N
D
O m N N
z
zam_�.3.g
a
M
o N [o
m
o
a n c c
N
N
In
91 O N
O
Z
N < O
N= 7 N
m
m
O
`
m
N
O
N
O 0 O
7
N
N
In,
C
N
N
3
m .�a�
�.m
o zo 3
CD
m
V7 m
"o
N
c
.�
.,
7
n
�
C
m
F
7
In
N D f/I N
m o
N
N
O
fD
n n 00
w
DD
M c�mt°
co
° v �'
0
(�
pOj
�
II II II II
II
II II
v N o
e�
O
0
n
3
m
o
O
II
3
N
m
''IQ
m
zz3337-n
C1
a
a
3 o:n
o
' m
v
o D M
'.
II II II II
II
II II
I m m � m
N_
iII
Z
m
O
O tll v
0
0 0
3 3
II
C
0
o
m
m a
v C
m
Io
c n
<
w m v a z z z
oo
m u
O-
2
0 s c
'.
2
Z
� a H
O
CTC
O O IT
Z
7
II II II II
II
II II
N S
Z
z D
v o
m 3
I
m
{
Z
I
O
N
N
w

\\\\\/
//3.......
cn
cn
)0Z
_
\
)
22W
\
/\I
\
�
_
)
,;±
&
,�o
}\
a=
-
g
\\
\\
\;(
\
.M,
] (D
000
�O:
3`3CD
e
\}\
\
�
\
\
\

n c n co m -o 5D
m m m m Z
7:
z
w Z o 9 n r
< -o m c
m -o v -a
a m �. < n m
m
O
m.n W
m
f
o nC�mc D
m o o
m o
=
N
N m 2 p co m n
< m m o
a
D
a
Q D Q 5 3
m°
Q m°
3
z m a�0 ma
v _
aom o.
°
m c cD
o
h
C
7
Cl)
3''mQ�n
N o p1 0 g m
N <. 3 O m m
0 d N
C
N
N
3
a� v �. `°
3 z 0 3
y
•`°
—
3
c
m u c �
G
A
m
N
II
n o 3
n
3
n
m
om
o
?
�
0
3
nn0 U3 > D
n� o
'CD
a
II I I I I I I II I I II
m�? o
.Z
o
D
N 3
d
3
m
3 3
m �'
o
Z Z
m
m fD ❑
�. o
o
m
m
m a
"o
n
Enmvzzz
oN
Z Z�
m a a N
O
a
O m
�
II j
II II 11 II II II II
3 �
Z
-
vl
N r Z Z D
m
O
0
m S m o -' F 3
d
{
m 3
c m — o
-0
1p
3 m
° z
`<
I
c
m 3
0
m
o0
N
u
Z
O
�
N

\�
`
�(\\(\/
\
ƒ
- » @
§
-
%
!
0 0`
o 7
§
} cn
(
CD}
�
z
I
§ m
CD0
.
,zCD
G
O
w
§
/\(
.{
\g
)e
)
J
(
3
/0o
Z
,
R;,
_
y
_
/
■
me[cr
cu
.0
._
.:
-
7
cn
.o
..
,»/
_
o
f
CD2
z
-°/

\=-\(I
/
(
_--\�/
&
\\}\\\\\
\
2
fm
\
/
0
°
W Im W 0
-
\
(
®2In
- -
m
>,
-0
-RZ%
J}«%(
(
}
:
)/-
}
yf\&{%y
{
_
})
CL
f
,
[\\
-0c
\;°
7
-
-
\
\}17
ƒ/to
\
\
>
2_22,y»�
aaw
o
»
7®
//3J3{\
]}\})
}
\ ; \�
£2,
0
cn\}<z
\
!lJ�ID
\�
!�
(~
It 11
��\1
�
/}\\\}7
`\
.
\�\\
®`®�\`\�
f
tJ&s
FT11
\
\/§\\\>
��0m
K;_/'
z
.
\!
.

WA RS IC1 L RAL
�Aj1'slrJR Inc.
LT OR ENc. _
liquid Manure/Sludge
' _I
Analysis and Application Report
364 West Park Drive Warsaw, \C 28398 [phone] FAX [phone]
Ship To:
Grower: MIKE KENNEDY
AGRIMENT SERVICES, INC
SampleNumber: LAGOON
Date Submitted: 4/26/2019
PO BOX 1096
BEULAVILLE, NC 28518
Lab Number: 92021 MS
Report Date: 5/2/2019
Type: Lagoon Sludge Anaerobic -Swine Application Method: Broadcast
Test1000
Nitrogen - Total
840
gal.
7.01
Estimate of Nutrients Available
For First Crop- Ibs/1000 gal.
3.50
Ammonia Nitrogen
672
5.60
5.60
Nitrate Nitrogen
32.2
0.27
.27
Phosphorus
110.44
0.92
.92
P205 - Total
253.07
2.11
2.11
K20 - Total
732A9
6.11
6 11
Sulfur
86.12
072
72
Boron
0 84
0.01
.01
Zinc
837
0.07
.07
Manganese
1.67
0.01
.01
Iron
24.47
0.20
.20
Copper
5.14
0.04
.04
Calcium
152.97
1.28
1.28
Magnesium
98.9
0.82
.82
Sodium
163.92
1.37
1.37
Aluminum
6.44
005
05
BOD
268.5 mg/L
Total Suspended Solids
3420 Pon
Results Reported On:
Remarks:
L=LIQUID BASIS
This document may be reproduced only in its entirety. Waters Agricultural Laboratories has no control over the manner in which samples are
taken, therefore, analysis is based solely on the sample as received. Lab liability is limited to the fee assessed on the referenced sample.