20190573 Ver 2_PCN Form Submission_20200316

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20190573
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
(T Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Smithfield Water Treatment Plant E)pansion
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ted Cradle, Director of Public Utilities, Town of Smithfield
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/16/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Buffalo Creek and Neuse River
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
Buffalo Cr = Class C-NSW; Neuse R = Class WS-5-NSW dnst of intake
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
Longitude:
35.5184
-78.3464
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
18 - Minor Discharges
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Town of Smithfield
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Deed Book 00681 Page 0176
2c. Responsible party:
Ted Cradle, Director of Public Utilities
2d.Address
Street Address
PO Box 761
Address Lim 2
aty
Smithfield
Postal / Zip Cate
27577
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4a. Name:
Gerald Pottern

4b. Business Name:
Mogensen Mitigation Inc
4c.Address
Street Address
104 East Chestnut Ave
Address tine 2
CKY
Wake Forest
Postal / Zip Code
27587
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization signed Smithfield.pdf
State / Province / I;Lgion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
246.96KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Smithfield, NC
2. Project tt Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
Parcel ID# 15002005
42.3
2c. Project Address
Street Address
515 North 2nd Street
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / legion
Smithfield
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27577
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Buffalo Creek and Neuse River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Buffalo Cr = Class C-NSW; Neuse R = Class WS-5-NSW dnst of intake
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03020201-1105
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Smithfield WTP has an ebsting 4-acre rawwater reservoir built in the 1970s on the Neuse River floodplain, north of the confluence with Buffalo Creek. The proposed reservoir
e)pansion area immediately south of the ebsting reservoir contains mixed hardwood/pine forest, a paved greenway trail, and a wetland along the eastern edge. The raw water intake is
near the northwest corner of the ebsting reservoir, 500 ft upstream of the proposed construction area. The proposed construction area is at least 80 feet from the bank of the Neuse
River, and more than 100 feet from Buffalo Creek. The water treatment plant is across Buffalo Creek 600 ft east of the project area, at 515 North Second Street.
This project was previously submitted in July 2019 as a 404 Individual Permit with 0.25 acre of wetland impact (NC-DWR project # 19-0573 and USACE ID# SAW-2019-00082). The
Town and engineers have redesigned the project to further reduce impacts below 0.10 acre, thus meeting conditions for NWP-18.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
PCN Figures-USGS Quad Selma.pdf 248.82KB

4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
PCN Figures-NRCS SoilMap.pdf 238.91 KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.84 ac (in JD review area)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1900 ft (Buffalo Creek)
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Smithfield plans to build a a second rawwater reservoir on the south side of the existing reservoir, as part of an upgrade and treatment capacity increase at the water treatment plant.
The supplementary reservoir will increase the total rawwater storage capacity to 20 million gallons, and will facilitate periodic sand removal from the reservoir. NC Public Water Supply
Division requires the raw water storage capacity to meet or exceed 2 times the plant's rated daily flow. The 20-year projected maximum day demand is 8.2 MGD, which includes
Smithfield's in -town customers plus bulk sales of treated water to neighboring local governments.
The WTP has ongoing issues with sand intrusion in the intake, rawwater pumps, and rawwater reservoir. In June 2016 the Town completed a sand removal projectto reduce sand
accumulation in the rawwater pump wet well and ultimately in the rawwater reservoir. This proposed expansion will create a forebay to facilitate sand removal from the rawwater prior to
pumping to the WTP. As sand accumulates in the forebay, WTP staff can isolate this portion of the reservoir and remove the sand while maintaining operation of the existing reservoir
for water production. Currently, the existing single reservoir must be bypassed during sediment removal, which increases the potential for sand accumulation in the treatment basins.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The rawwater reservoir will be expanded southward by clearing 3.3 ac of floodplain forest and building a diked area to create a second reservoir with approximately 1.8 acre pool area.
This Will require clearing and minor grading in 0.02 ac of forested wetland GC for building the reservoir embankment and installing the new perimeter fence along the northwest edge of
the wetland. A 10 to 20-ft wide strip along the outside of the fence will be kept mowed for fence maintenance. A toe drain system inside the embankment will collect seepage water on
the east side and discharge it via a 300-ft pipe just upslope of wetland GB. The discharge pipe headwall and riprap dissipator will be outside of the wetland and the Neuse Buffer. The
drainage water Will flow through wetland GB to Buffalo Creek, which is approximately 120 It east of the toe drain discharge. Other proposed improvements on the WTP property are on
previously disturbed uplands east of Buffalo Creek, and will not affect streams, wetlands, or riparian buffers. Typical earth moving equipment including excavators and bulldozers will be
used. See attached plans.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Impact Map 12.mar.20.pdf 518.37KB
SitePlans SD4_MHoles_Headwall.pdf 1015.55KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
Delineated June 2018; revised Feb 2019 during field meeting with ACE agent
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-00082
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Gerald Pottern
Agency/Consultant Company: Mogensen Mitigation Inc
Other:
O Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
Feb 01, 2019 -- Ross Sullivan conducted a field review of MMI's delineation and requested modifications. The revised delineation map and WoUS resource table were submitted on Feb
02. On Mar 04, 2019, Mr. Sullivan responded by email that the revised submittal "accurately depicts the limits of any potentially jurisdictional WoUS within the project area". The revised
WoUS map and Mr. Sullivan's email reply are uploaded.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
PJD Email Ross 04mar19.pdf 197.98KB
PCN Figures-PJD DelinMap.pdf 314.17KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
Johnston County (not Smithfield) has submitted a PCN for a wastewater force main crossing the WTP property south of the proposed reservoir. Neither of these projects is dependent
on the other. The wastewater project is part of a multi -stage, multi -year County plan to provide sewer conveyance capacity to the towns of Pine Level, Selma and Smithfield. The
conveyance system running between Pine Level and the wastewater treatment facility is intended to move wastewater from Pine Level, through Selma and Smithfield, to the Buffalo
Creek lift station and ultimately to the WWTF located two miles downstream (southwest) of the Smithfield WTP. The County's improvement has been on the books for a fewyears and is
designed to serve a growing portion of the County that is far beyond what the Smithfield Water Treatment Plant serves.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory �n) I
1. Impacts Summary

1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands r Streams -tributaries F Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name* 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area
W1 embankment grading & P Bottomland Hardwood Forest GC Yes Both 0.020
fence maint (acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.020
2h. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.020
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation v
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The engineers evaluated several potential reservoir expansion designs to minimize wetland and floodplain impacts. Expansion to the east would avoid
wetland impacts, but conflicts With FEMA guidance for reducing flood rise impacts, as expansion eastward would be perpendicular to the direction of
flood flow. The proposed embankment slope is as steep as possible (3:1) and the perimeter fence is as close to the toe of fill as possible. The
proposed reservoir size has been reduced from 25 to 20 MG to minimize wetland impacts. The wetland impact is reduced from 0.25 acre (previous
plan, submitted in July 2019) to 0.02 acre.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction site access will use uplands and existing roads. The temporary sediment basin (sheet C-203) will be in uplands outside of the Neuse
River buffer. Approved erosion and sedimentation control plans will be followed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Wetland impact is less than 0.10 acre, and there are no impacts to streams or open waters.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) C^U
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
Surface runoff from the reservoir perimeter dike Will be diffuse flow over grass. The internal toe drain seepage collector will discharge into wetland GB where it will be diffused before
flowing into Buffalo Creek.
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
r Yes r No
Comments:*
Project does not meet NEPA or SEPA funding and impact thresholds.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Increasing the water treatment plant capacity will not directly cause additional development, but it will support expected new development. Planning
strategies and mitigative measures to ensure that new development is compatible with protection of wetlands, streams, and other natural resources
are discussed on the Town of Smithfield's planning website: https://www.smithfield-nc.conVpage/planning_townplan
and the Town of Smithfield Comprehensive Growth Management Plan:
https://www.smithfield-nc.00rrVpage/open/l 666/0/Comprehensive % 20GrovAh % 20Management / 20PIan. pdf
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The US-FWS and NC-NHP websites list six federally protected species known in Johnston County: Bald eagle, Red -cockaded woodpecker, Dwarf
wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel, Yellow lance, and Michaux!s sumac. Michauxts sumac is the only federally protected species reported within one
mile of the project area (NHP records), but this record is more than 180 years old. MMI found no evidence of Michauxs sumac or Red -cockaded
woodpecker, nor suitable habitat for these species, during the June 2018 site visit. We also found no evidence of any bald eagle nesting site during
the June 2018 and Feb 2019 visits. No impacts to the Neuse River or Buffalo Creek are proposed; therefore, no impact to river mussels is expected.
Three NC protected mussels (Triangle floater, Eastern lampmussel, and Roanoke slabshell) are reported in the Neuse River near Smithfield.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NHP Report_ Smithfield-RWI_11645.pdf 886.01 KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*

r Yes
r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://vwAv.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Smithfield Historic District (National Register site # JT1255) is located 0.2 mile south of the project area, across Buffalo Creek, and will not
be affected. Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas (ACC) surveyed the 3.3 acre proposed construction area for prehistoric artifacts on March 9
and did not find anything of significance. ACC's report has not yet been received, but a copy of principal investigator Michael O'Neal's email is
uploaded.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
PCN Figures-SHPO Map.pdf 237.84KB
Archaeo Rept ONeal Email.pdf 62.08KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
r Yes
r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project is within the 1 % floodplain of the Neuse River and Buffalo Creek, but is outside the FEMA floodways of both streams. The reservoir
expansion is parallel to the existing Neuse River flow path and will not block any additional flood flow area nor impact flood heights along the Nauss
River. The project Will cause a slight rise in flood height (maximum 0.04 ft) along Buffalo Creek near the WTP. A flood modeling study of Buffalo Creek
is attached.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA-FRIS DFIRM Panel 1694, Map Number: 3720169400K
Miscellaneous
Comments
Misc attachments: Buffalo Creek flood study for WTP expansion, Jan 2019 and Flood elevations map.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Flood Study Smithfield WTP 20190103.pdf 3.47MB
PCN-2 Floodplain Map-3.pdf 134.42KB
Signature u
B, By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Gerald Pottern
Signature
Date
3/16/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM for Section 404-401 Permitting
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Town of Smithfield -- Water Treatment Plant
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 15002005 Johnston Co.
STREET ADDRESS: 515 North 2nd St, Smithfield, NC 27577
Please print:
Property Owner 1: _Town of Smithfield, Dept of Public Utilities
Property Owner 2:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Gerald Pottern and Rich Mogensen of Mogensen Mitigation Inc (MMI-RJGA)
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Ted Credle, Director of Public Utilities, P.O. Box 761, Smithfield, NC 27577
Telephone: [phone] [e-mail]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
6'�
Authorized Signature 1 Authorized Signature 2
Date: 11-7-1 a Date:

Smithfield Water Treatment Plant Reservoir Expansion, Johnston County -- Wetland Impacts Map -- March 2020
MANHOLE FRAME & COVER
FIN. GRADE
PRECAST CONCRETE RING OR BRICK
Title Annotation ° & MORTAR FOR GRADE ADJUSTMENT
D (THREE COURSES OR 8" MAX.)
EXTERNAL JOINT SEALS
PER SPECIFICATIONS
STEPS
D
SEAL JOINTS PER
SPECIFICATIONS BRICK & MORTAR OR
PRECAST INVERT
MIN. 1" PER FOOT
SLOPE UP FROM 3/4
OF PIPE DIAMETER
EXTENDED BASE WHERE
INDICATED ON DRAWINGS
j o �0000 00 00 00 �000
00� °0000� °0 000 °0�00� °0�00�
0 L�! OOo °0 0Oo °OnOOo °O OOo °On000 °0 0O0
OSTONE (EXT. 6" BEYOND BASE)
PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE
NOT TO SCALE
24" DIA.
ECCENTRIC
'
CONC UNIT
y
J
12
�
I
�
3
APPROVED
Lu
N
SEALANT
1
Q
MANHOLE
TEPS
16" O.C.
EXIST.
_
SEWER
5
LINE
z
w
CONC
FILL
O.C.E.W.
4'-0"
8"
i
5
5'
4'-10"
MORTAR COAT —
" THICK SEAL
W
ITH BITUMASTIC
TYPICAL SECTION
5 DOGHOUSE MANHOLE
D-4 NOT TO SCALE
MASONRY SEAL
ZACTORS
.-..... ..'ROVIDE
GASKETED MANHOLE
OPENINGS
ALTERNATE HYDRANT LEG POSITIONS FOR 1'-0" TYP. UNLESS
MAINS LARGER THAN 20 (SEE NOTE 3) NOTED OTHERWISE
X" x 6" WELDED ON DRAWING
a a OUTLET LOCATION (�
° HYDRANT TO BE
PLACED WITH 4 1 /2"
PUMPER NOZZLE
X" x 6" WELDED FACING ROAD
OUTLET LOCATION 2 1 /2" HOSE
c AT LOW POINTS AT HIGH POINTS NOZZLE
Sao zi Q i (TYP. OF 2)
VALVE PROTECTOR RING HYDRANT TO BE
PAINTED TWO COATS
Z CI VALVE BOX i AFTER INSTALLATION.
i
6" GV FLGxMJ z
�I HYDRANT
p " TEE o z
NEW 2i [--
v WATER MAIN D°oo NOT LESS THAN 8
a,
CU.FT. #57 CRUSHED
N Q ao STONE (AROUND
CONCRETE + WEEP HOLES)
O THRUST
v BLOCKING 6"DIP CONCRETE THRUST
SOLID CONC PAD BLOCKING
L"I 18" SQ x 3" THICK RESTRAINED (2" MIN FROM
(MIN DIMENSIONS) M J WEEP HOLES)
(SEE NOTE 1)
NOTES:
cj_ m 1. POUR CONCRETE SO THAT NO FITTING OR FLANGES ARE COVERED.
M 2. HYDRANT STANDPIPE TO BE EXTENDED AS NECESSARY TO SUIT FIN GROUND ELEVATION.
o N 3. AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON PLANS FOR MAINS LARGER THAN 20", USE ALTERNATE
HYDRANT LEG POSITION AS SHOWN ABOVE WITH WELDED OUTLETS IN LIEU OF TEES.
a,
FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
qj NOT TO SCALE
�\o
TWO 1" DIA HOLES
REQUIRED FOR
ALL TYPES OF
COVERS: WATER
SANITARY SEWER
& STORM SEWER
BOTTOM OF
COVER
TOP OF COVER
LAG BOLTS
;TYP. OF 4)
2'-1 Y4"
1'-11 %" 4" MIN.
1'-11 /2"
LAG BOLTS
(TYP. OF 4)
1"
�11
4 Y- 2 - 2 - 4 Y
8" � � 8"
2'-9 Y"
4
STD MANHOLE RING & COVER
D-4 / NOT TO SCALE
SURFACE COURSE
BASE COURSE
NOW
- 0)
PROVIDE 3000 PSI
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
IN PAVED AREAS.
SECURE FRAME TO MANHOLE WITH
z_ 4 EQ. SPACED %" ANCHOR BOLTS
IN NON -TRAFFIC AREAS
6"
MANE
RING &
/ /
USE ROPE MASTIC SEAL
UNDER FRAME
MANHOLE IN PAVEMENT
& SIDEWALKS
u
COMPACTED FILL
MANHOLE IN NON -PAVED AREAS
MANHOLE FRAME & COVER
NOT TO SCALE
1W -
° °
10"
o 0
8„ 4/8" BASE
VARIES (24" - 36") PLATE
i
WEEP HOLE
S.STL. CHAIN - FLOOR MOUNTED
CABLE STAINLESS STEEL
14" S.STL SOCKET
3/g" WALL PLATE
D-L WINCH `
w ASSEMBLY
j SAFETY
HOOK
STATIC 6 0 © T'
< � � LOOP
O
STAINLESS
STEEL TUBE WALL MOUNTED
DAVIT 24" = 49" STAINLESS STEEL
36" = 34" SOCKET
LIFTING
HEIGHT
FIELD —
STAINLESS INSTALLED
STEEL TUBE ANCHOR }
MAST
STAINLESS STEEL
EMBED SOCKET
NOTE:
60" OVERALL Qi MOUNTING HOLES ARE 3/4"0
HEIGHT
ri o PORTABLE HOIST AND BASE DETAIL
SD-4 NTS
PORTABLE HOIST SHALL BE FROM THERN, HALLIDAY, OR OTHER APPROVED MANUFACTURER.
NOTE:
HYDRANT SHALL BE
SELF DRAINING,
NON-FREEZING
COMPRESSION TYPE.
DUCTILE IRON
EXTENSION —
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
LOCKING WRENCH OPTION
POST HYDRANT (ECLIPSE
No 2 BY JOHN C. KUPFERLE
FOUNDRY OR EQUAL)
CAST IRON RISER
16"x24"x4" CONCRETE PAD
VALVE WITH BOX, SIZE
PER LINE,
GRADE
w
>
0
v
LO
° , o (' 2"0 PIPE, SEE SITE PLAN
�OO�og° °O�o
4 CUBIC FEET
CRUSHED STONE
4 x8 SOLID MASON
BLOCKS MJ OR IP INLET
CONNECTION
i31 NON -FREEZE POST HYDRANT
SD-41 NOT TO SCALE
A�
5„ i T-10"
NCDOT # 840.24 GRATE
AND FRAME CAST IN
PRECAST TOP SLAB
I- III-
III-
PRECAST
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
BOX
0
5"
PIPE INSULATION (EXTERIOR) NOTES:
A)
INSULATION ASTM C547; RIGID MOLDED, NONCOMBUSTIBLE, GLASS FIBER
Q 0 0
1.
'K' VALVE: ASTM C335, 0.24 AT 75 DEGREES F.Of
jDf
2.
MINIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE: -20 DEGREES F.
0 0- �
3.
MAXIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE: 300 DEGREES F.
LuLu
4.
MAXIMUM MOISTURE ABSORPTION: 0.2 PERCENT BY VOLUME.
J Lu
B)
VAPOR BARRIER JACKET
Q Lu w
J
1.
ASTM C921, WHITE KRAFT PAPER REINFORCED WITH GLASS FIBER YARN
AND BONDED TO ALUMINIZED FILM.
p �
2.
MOISTURE VAPOR TRANSMISSION: ASTM E96; 0.02 PERM INCHES.
u- �__
3.
SECURE WITH SELF SEALING LONGITUDINAL LAPS AND BUTT STRI PS.
O
Z
4.
SECURE WITH OUTWARD CLINCH EXPANDING STAPLES AND VAPOR
BARRIER MASTIC.
C)
ALUMINUM JACKET: ASTM B209
1.
THICKNESS: 0.016 INCH SHEET.
2.
FINISH: SMOOTH.
3.
JOINING: LONGITUDINAL SLIP JOINTS AND 2 INCH LAPS.
4.
FITTING: 0.016 INCH THICK DIE SHAPED FITTING COVERS WITH FACTORY
ATTACHED PROTECTIVE LINER.
5.
METAL JACKET BANDS: 3/8 INCH WIDE; 0.015 INCH THICK ALUMINUM.
D)
I NSTALLATI
ON
1.
FOR EXTERIOR PIPING, INSULATE FITTINGS, JOINTS AND VALVES WITH INSULATION
OF LIKE MATERIAL, THICKNESS AND FINISH AS ADJOINING PIPE. COVER WITH
ALUMINUM JACKET WITH SEAMS LOCATED ON BOTTOM SIDE OF HORIZONTAL
PIPING
2.
FOR PIPE SIZE UP TO AND INCLUDING 2" - PROVIDE 1 1 /2" THICK INSULATION
3.
FOR PIPE SIZE OVER 2" AND LARGER - PROVIDE 2" THICK INSULATION
TYPICAL PIPE INSULATION (EXTERIOR)
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE:
PRECAST SLAB MAY BE
SUBSTITIUTED FOR BRICKWORK
7FRAME, GRATE, & HOOD
PER NCDOT STD.840.03
2'-10"
5„ 511
FRAME & GUTTER
`^ GRATE SECTION
Elf
oLLJ
z
z �� FILL CORED 1� z
PIPE OPENINGS ! PRECAST '
W/ GROUT CONCRETE o
Ln PIPE 2" MIN GROUT \ ~
f % 2'-6" MIN FILL IF NEEDED o
TO MATCH LL
PIPE INVERT z
_ Q
SLOPE: Y" / FTLLJ
D
LLJ
cn
•a°°op.o °op •a°°opo °gip i - —
.o
PLAN
6;.�i�
3'-8"
NOTE:
INSTALL CAST IRON MANHOLE STEPS IN
ALL CATCH BASINS OVER 4'-0" IN DEPTH.
MEASURE DEPTH FROM THE TOP OF THE
GUTTER TO INVERT OF CATCH BASIN.
STOP OF CURB
rm
SLOPE OF GUTTER
(UPPER SIDE 5' TO 10')
(LOWER SIDE 2%2' TO
5') AS DIRECTED BY
ENGINEER
C
5'-011
SECTION A -A CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL
YARD INLET DETAIL
7 NOT TO SCALE
SD-4
8"
�
8
4"
� 8"
VULCAN FOUNDARY
-
FRAME
N 00
Lv CV
VULCAN CURB INLET
o
SERIES V-4302-2
C5
VER
MOUNTABLE CURB i3l
91
6" �611
wr7 0-
6"
3 R
6"R
4
PLAN
CONCRETE STRUCTURE
—811 (VULCAN V-9431)
vAH STEPS REQ'D IF DEPTH
OF BASIN OVER 5'-0"
:ON 15'' CENTERS)
;IZE REQ
SECTION THRU BASIN INLET CONFIGURATION
i� STANDARD CURB INLET
NOT TO SCALE
BARRIER CURB
TYPICAL CURB INLET
8 NOT TO SCALE
SD-4
PROVIDE 2 SY OF NCDOT
CLASS A RIP -RAP A
MIN. OF 1 FT. THICKNESS
A oO DooO I1�ooOpD
o pc o °J o
o
o°Q
9d��� o .�
NON -CORROSIVE
INSECT SCREEN
BETWEEN FLANGES PLAN
FLAP VALVE
[V
#4 BARS @ 8"
8" - FIN. GRADE
N �^ kO
Co
OOoO
o O
�DO�o U_ Z_
��LU
°D���
() oc000' 0 Q �00 00 _
44JJL J�o of III
illlllillllllllllllll-1 M
#4 BARS @8" 12"
SECTION A -A
CONCRETE HEADWALL DETAIL
N.T.S.
Z
O
U)
W
M
z"
QM
N ,n
U MLo
z
O
M O
U
L 06
.��LL
Z`°
Cn . .
I
M
C:)
N
5CD W U_
Lu
=z
0
Q
Z_
J
Of
U
2
Of
O
Z
L COARSE
STONE
L
Lu
2E
1'-4" DRAI
U)
TILE EACH
LL
O
SIDE
Z
O
Z
0
Z
O
U)
z
O
H
z
Lu
Lu
>
Of
0-
Z
_j
I..L
H
Z
Lu
Lu
F_/
Lu
Q
U)
J
Q
Lu
J �
Q �
z
w0_
0-
U)
Ir Q �
0
2: Lu
Qz
H Q
C/) J
'Lu
U)
��•��(N CARp�''•,
SEAL
22531
cs FNG I N �5W.
DESIGNED BY:
CWD
DRAWN BY:
PMD/EML
CHECKED BY:
CWD
PROJECT NO.:
2698-BY
DATE:
MARCH 2O19
SCALE:
AS NOTED
SHEET NO
SD-4

RE: SAW-2019-00082 JD Request, Smithfield Water Treatment Plant (UNCLASSIFIED)
Sullivan, Roscoe L III CIV (US) <[e-mail]>
Mon 3/4, 9:09 AM Gerald Pottern;Rich Mogensen

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Hey Gerald,

I conducted a site visit with you at the above referenced property on 2/1/2019 to verify the limits of any
potentially jurisdictional waters of the United States (WoUS) within the project area. I have determined
that the revised delineation map that you provided to me on 2/2/2019 entitled "Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination" accurately depicts the limits of any potentially jurisdictional WoUS within
the project area.

I will issue the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for this project in the order that it was received,
but please note that I have a substantial backlog of permits and JDs to work through at this time and it
may take several months.

Also, I remember discussing the proposed project would likely necessitate the relocation of the existing
greenway. Unless there is a valid purpose and need for the relocation unrelated to the raw water
reservoir expansion, any impacts to WoUS that occur as a result of the greenway’s relocation will need
to be considered with the impacts that result from the raw water reservoir expansion.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Best,

Ross Sullivan, PWS, ISA Certified Arborist
Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105

Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Office #: 919-554-4884. Ext. 25
Email: [e-mail]

==============================================================
From: Gerald Pottern [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2019 2:43 PM
To: Sullivan, Roscoe L III CIV (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rich Mogensen <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: JD Request, Smithfield Water Treatment Plant (UNCLASSIFIED)

Hi Ross -- Thanks for meeting with me yesterday to verify the delineation at the Smithfield
WTP. I added the points we talked about on the NW side of wetland GA and the connector
channel with GB. I also removed the two channels west of GC, and added the drainage channel
from GC to Buffalo Creek as part of the wetland, rather than a stream. The revised map and
aquatic resources table are attached.

Gerald Pottern
Mogensen Mitigation Inc. (Raleigh Office)
MMI Environmental Consultants
104 East Chestnut Avenue
Wake Forest, NC 27587
---------------------------------------------------------
(formerly Robert J Goldstein & Associates)
---------------------------------------------------------
Office / Home: 919-556-8845
Mobile / Text: 919-649-6506
-------------------------------------
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
<º/,}}}}}}}=<{ <º/,}}}}}}}=<{ <º/,}}}}}}}=<{
<º/,}}}}}}}=<{ <º/,}}}}}}}=<{ <º/,}}}}}}}=<{

From: Archcon <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 3:54 PM
To: Ted Credle <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Archaeology proposal, Smithfield WTP

Ted, I’m sorry I meant to email you last week with the schedule. We did the survey this morning. We didn’t find
anything. I think I can have a draft copy of the report to you in the next few weeks.

Mike O’Neal
Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 9, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Ted Credle <[e-mail]> wrote:
Mr. O’Neal,

Good afternoon.
What is your timeline on getting this project underway/completed? We are understandably worried about the time
your investigation & report will take – as we are on a deadline with the US Army Corps and the State of NC. I am not
trying to rush you – I only want to gauge things out, so we will know where we stand.
Thanks for your help.

Ted Credle, P.E.
Director of Public Utilities
Town of Smithfield
230 Hospital Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-2116 x-1162

From: Ted Credle
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2020 10:40 AM
To: [e-mail] ; Gerald Pottern <[e-mail]>; Charles Davis
<[e-mail]>;
Cc: Dale Boyette <[e-mail]>; Rich Mogensen <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Archaeology proposal, Smithfield WTP

Gentlemen,

Please see the attached, signed proposal.
Contact Mr. Dale Boyette, Water Plant Superintendent, at (919-934-2661) to coordinate your visit.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

Ted Credle, P.E.
Director of Public Utilities
Town of Smithfield
230 Hospital Road
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-2116 x-1162

NCNHDE-5645
March 23, 2018
Gerald Pottern
Mogensen Mitigation Inc (was Robert J Goldstein & Assoc)
104 East Chestnut Ave
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: Smithfield RWI Reservoir; GBP-2018-02
Dear Gerald Pottern:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one-mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Smithfield RWI Reservoir
Project No. GBP-2018-02
March 23, 2018
NCNHDE-5645
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Freshwater
Bivalve
8700 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2016-07-29 A 3-Medium Species of
Concern
Threatened G4 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium Species of
Concern
Threatened G3 S3
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area*
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County: multiple local government Local Government
*NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 23, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Smithfield RWI Reservoir
Project No. GBP-2018-02
March 23, 2018
NCNHDE-5645
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Amphibian 35965 Anaxyrus quercicus Oak Toad 1969-08-01 H 3-Medium ---Significantly
Rare
G5 S3
Dragonfly or
Damselfly
33753 Somatochlora georgiana Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?5-Very
Low
---Significantly
Rare
G3G4 S2?
Freshwater
Bivalve
8700 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2016-07-29 A 3-Medium Species of
Concern
Threatened G4 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium Species of
Concern
Threatened G3 S3
Freshwater
Bivalve
31144 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2005-01-12 E 3-Medium ---Threatened G5 S3
Vascular Plant 8317 Rhus michauxii Michaux's Sumac 1833-07 X 6-Unknow
n
Endangered Endangered G2G3 S2
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Easement NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust
Fund
State
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 23, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 4 of 4