20011794 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20010127 (2)

\o?oF w AT Fgo?
?i r
>
O 'r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
February 6, 2002
Franklin County
DWQ Project #: 01-1794
DOE# 200220034
APPROVAL OF 401Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Neuse River Buffer Rules
James Privette
12224 Louisburg Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dear Mr. Privette:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 0.25
acres of wetlands, and 0.29 acre of stream buffers for constructing a road crossing at Fairfield subdivision, as
you described in your application dated December 6, 2001 and revised on February 4, 2002. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3287.
This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 39 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. This
approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 213 .033). In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as
modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application.. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or
in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506
(h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise
provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on alfremaining jurisdictional wetlands and
waters or areas within 50 feet of all streams and ponds to notify the state in order to assure compliance for
future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of
this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. Stormwater shall be directed to flow at non-erosive velocities across the entire protected stream buffers.
3. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ that all the work included in the 401 Certification has been completed.
The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the
Division of Water Quality.
NCDENR
Wetlands/401 unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Steve Mitchell at our Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
Si cerely,
I
(I
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Raleigh Division of Land Resources
Todd Preuninger, Soil & Environmental Consultants
1`
so ,
Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phol e,-EOIVaK9 9 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
Transmittal t= E$ 1 1 2002
To: )-\,.. -D?r
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
? Correspondence
Q- As per your request
I ER 14
Project Date: ? ? ,
X1:..1(=ft HTIULA
Project Name: l A r AN
File:
a For your information and files
['For comment or approval
? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
Under Separate Cover:
? By mail
? By courier
? By express
No. Copies Document No. Date Descrip
ion
t

'
l

LL
By:
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
PMB 291, 3020-I Prosperity Church Road 3817-E Lawndale Drive 910 Boston Road
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
L V1IVLVJI.l1 VJ (L1V •lVl GJ ll JlVll CW UVV YV, 1111111I? •lV Lll?' UJ 4l ViIVV.
TO: BONN DORNEY- NC-DWQ
FROM: KEVIN MARTIN - SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTAN'Is, PA
SUBJE(-T': FAIRFIELD SUBDIVISION -DWQ #:01-1794, S&F?C #:01-5099
DATE: 2/6/02
CC: TODD PREUNINGER - SOIL, & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL"PANTS, PA
Can we construct lot 4 without wetland impacts?
There is no impact associated with construction of lot 4 - see attached plans
2. Need to address endangered species concerns with the USACF
The USAGE has already issued the permit dated December 20, 2001
Nearest end. sp. Population is 8.5 miles downstream and separated by two large ponds.
3. Please explain why mitigation is requested?
We are below the thresholds required for mitigation (less than 1 acre and 150 linear
feet/tributary).
4. The 261 linear ft. in the application was linear feet of buffer (on two separate tributaries)
not stream. The impacts are to a beaver marsh and to a pond dam so Table 2 on pg. 6 of the
PCN form is correct as `NA' because there is no stream channel. Given this, we do not feel
that mitigation should be required.
Therefore we request that you proceed with processing and approval of our client's 401 water quality
certification.
TO: JOHN DORNEY - NGDWQ
FROM: KEVIN MARTIN - SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
SIJBJECI': FAIRFIELD SUBDIVISION - DWQ #:01-1794, S&EC #:01-5099
DATE: 2/4/02
CC: TODD PREUNINGER - SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL. CONSULTANTS, PA
1. Can we construct lot 4 without wetland impacts?
There is no impact associated with construction of lot 4 - see attached plans
2. Need to address endangered species concerns with the USACE?
The USACE has already issued the permit dated December 20, 2001
Nearest end. sp. Population is 8.5 miles downstream and separated by two large ponds.
3. Please explain why mitigation is requested?
We are below the thresholds required for mitigation (less than 1 acre and 1(50 linear
feet/tributary). O h? C -- t \ CQJCC? L
'Therefore we request that you proceed with processing and approval of our client's 401 water quality
certification. ?.?
st"
e?
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER
Wilmington District
Action ID: 2002200334 County
Notification of Jurisdictional Determina
Property
Owner James A. Privette
Fairfield Subdivision
Address 12224 Louisburg Road
Wake Forest. NC 27587
Telephone Number 919 556-3300
Authorized
Agent Soil & Environmental Consultants
C/o Todd Preuninger
Address 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number 919 846-5900
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.) James A. Privette's
proposed Fairfield Subdivision located off of Tarboro Road (SR 1100), adjacent to Little River,
near Youngsville, in Franklin County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following apply:
0 There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and surveyed.
The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determination on your property.
0 Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your wetlands
cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to obtain a consultant to obtain a more timely
delineation of the wetlands. Once the consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will
review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval be the
Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property without an approved survey.
4?O The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of the Corps iurisdiction have
been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
nohficaton.
0 There are no wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of
section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
0 The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of Coastal
Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
John Thomas at 919 - 876 8441 extension 9.5
Project Manager Signature
Date December 20, 2001 Expiration Date ecember 20.2
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM.
ro ?? C-
0 .
omW ?
D?Q
?mo
N N
NN::4 :3 ?s \
\
0 0 CD -0-1
zrz?
o
ti
N
Q N ? ?
C W
v (n cV0 IV
vCA 00 (A
000 ° © O O
N w co CO Cjj aee t 9i?
rn
? s s
o
°m
a oo
n t j O M
O:r
? o m o
p v \ all
all r
Y gr a?
2 C:
to o co D# O O y.
?$ cn 0
cv?
0?
.o°
? ? O O
o z0
0Z
9
? o ?
z
D
O
1

fE.O'

i
k ?I

41r -- I
?I

a
W
pi
(4-
V)
('7
r- c
1C
N
V --q

o 'rte
it
L? _I
0
o
v
0^1
01
2
ti
4
O
s2
?O
J

U
5
Cf
C,;

\p?OF W AT <cAQG
A r
o -?
January 17, 2002
DWQ #01-1794
Franklin County
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
James A. Privette
12224 Louisburg Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dear Ms. Privette:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of ill material into 261 linear feet of
streams and 0.25 acres of wetlands located at Fairfield subdivision in Franklin County. Insufficient evidence is
present in our files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0507. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below, we will have
to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0507(e) and will place this project on
hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, we are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the US
Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed as
planned and that you have no practicable altemative to placing fill in these waters and/or wetlands. Specifically can
you construct Lot #4 without wetland impact? We also understand you need to address endangered species issues
with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Any documentation such as maps and narrative that you can supply to
address altemative designs for your project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Also, this project
will require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h).
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to me and
one copy to Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Dr., Raleigh, NC 27687. If we do not hear from you in three
weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. If
you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786 or Steve Mitchell at our Raleigh Regional
Office at 919-571-4700/
Sincerely yours,

cc Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Todd Preuninfer
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Customer Service
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
M NR
1 800
623-7748
401 reviews
Subject: 401 reviews
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:25:32 -0500
From: Megan Owen <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR, DWQ
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cyndi:
How ya doing these days? Roman? I hope you're all well. I wanted to let you know that this will probably
be my last 401 review summary. I am leaving the state to take a job in Annapolis, MD. My last day here
is the 25th. If you ever want to chat, I can be reached at [e-mail]. I don't have my
other contact info yet. So Steve Zoufaly will be doing the 401 reviews from now on, or until you hear
otherwise from him. Anyway, below are the reviews:
401s with WSWP issues:
011676 (David & Paula Phillips, Gaston Co.) - in WS-IV, project is water dependent but must show no
practical alternative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater diverted away from surface waters, the use of
BMPs maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if impacted.
011529 (Southern Lifestyles, VI, Gaston Co.) - in WS-IV, project is water dependent but must show no
practical alternative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater diverted away from surface waters, the use of
BNIPs maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if impacted.
0 e:t A, l1riv =Franiffi0tb)-tin WS-II-PA, HQW, NSW. Generally private road crossings
are not allowed, but looks like the site can't be accessed otherwise. If we're going to allow the road
crossings, they must show no practical ahernative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater diverted away
from surface waters, the use of BNE"s maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if impacted. For the
rest of the development, the local government planning department needs to review for BUA, stormwater
(if applicable), and buffer compliance-
011790 (John Stoonski, Jackson Co.) -The project is in WS-III. For the culvert/relocation (if the stream is
a blue line on the US topo) they nwst mow no practical alternative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater
diverted away from surface waters, the nee of BMPs maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if
impacted. For the rest of the developmwnt, the local government planning department needs to review for
BUA, stormwater (if applicable), and buffer compliance.
0008646 (FedEX/PTIA, Gunflford Co) - in WS-III and WS-IV. For buffer encroachment they must show
no practical alternative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater diverted away from surface waters, the use
of BMPs maximized, and the buffet nom be revegetated if impacted. For the rest of the development, the
local government planning depantnoe t (m this rase the airport authority) needs to review for BUA,
stormwater (if applicable), and buffer compliance.
011793 (NC Div of Parks and Rec, h edell Co.) the project's in WS-IV. I don't consider adding sand to be
water dependent, but it is a public prvyac>? hence, the buffer encroachment is allowed if they do the
following: they must show no practical alternative, BUA must be minimized, stormwater diverted away ,
from surface waters, the use of BMPs maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if impacted.
011853 (Patricks Purchas Phase IL h4ecklenburg Co.) - in WS-IV, project is water dependent but must
show no practical alternative, BUA most be minimized, stormwater diverted away from surface waters, the
use of BMPs maximized, and the buffer must be revegetated if impacted
I or 2 1111/02 9:35
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Fairfield Subdivision c\o James A. Privette
Project Number 01 1794
Recvd From APP
Received Date 12/7101 Recvd By Region
Project Type Residential
Certificates
Permit Wetland
Type Type
39 F-
Mitigation
MitigationType
Wetland
Type Acres Feet
Stream Impacts (ft.)
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/COnd 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360001 Longitude (ddmmss) 782605
County Franklin
County2
Region Raleigh
Stream
Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Y ) N F-- 27-2-21 WSII HQW 30,401. 0.25 ?F- -^
) Y ON IF???? 1
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Comments:
HOLD
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com

December 6, 2001
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. John Dorney Attn: Mr. John Thomas
2321 Crabtree Blvd 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Parkview Building Raleigh, NC 27615
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 39/401 Water Quality Certification/Buffer Compliance Request
Fairfield Subdivision
Youngsville Township, Franklin County, North Carolina
(Lat./Long: 036° 00' 1" N, 78° 26' 5" W)
S&EC Project #: 99-5099
Dear Mr. Dorney and Mr. Thomas:
On behalf of Mr. James A. Privette (property owner), we hereby request authorization
from the US Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 39 to cover impacts to
two beaver impoundments and an emergent wetland (see attached impact map). We also
request written concurrence from the NC Division of Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the
project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated with Nationwide
Permit 39 and the Neuse River Basin buffer rules. A Pre-construction Notification
Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
The proposed project, which consists of a residential development, is located on the south
side of Tarboro Road (SR 1100) approximately one mile west of the intersection of
Tarboro Road (SR 1100) and Mays Store Road (SR 1106). The property is bounded on
the west by Little River. The project site is approximately 133 acres in size. Please refer
to the USGS topographic map attached for the location of the project. S&EC conducted a
detailed wetland delineation and Neuse River Basin (NRB) Riparian Buffer evaluation on
the property in July 2001. Copies of the delineation map and data forms are attached for
USACE review and approval. On August 3, 2001, Steve Mitchell of NC-DWQ
performed a site visit and determined that features A and B (see figure 2) are not subject
to the buffer rules. The remaining features on the property are subject as indicated on the
attached overall site map.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
PMB 291, 3020-I Prosperity Church Road 3817-E Lawndale Drive 910 Boston Road
Charlotte, NC 28269-7197 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
December 6, 2001
S&EC Project #: 99-5099
Page 2 of 3
Impacts 1 and 2
An unnamed tributary to Little River dissects the project site. Sections of this tributary
have been impounded due to beaver activity and were included in our delineation. The
Neuse Buffer depicted on the impact map extends outward 50-feet from the edge of the
wetlandstbeaver impoundments. The applicant chose this approach because the edge of
water tended to fluctuate depending of the amount of rain and/or beaver activity. Please
note that due to this approach, the buffers actually extend more than 50 feet from the
water's edge in some cases. The proposed road, necessary to provide access to the
eastern and western portions of the property, will impact a jurisdictional beaver
impoundment and an emergent wetland (Impacts 1 and 2). The applicant will minimize
impacts by locating the proposed road on top of an existing dam at the base of a drained
pond. The proposed crossing, Impact 2, will impact 128 linear feet of impounded water
and 2,251 sq. ft. of wetlands (0.05 ac.). Approximately 6,752 square feet of riparian
buffer (Zone 1-4,346 sq. ft., Zone 2-2,406 sq. ft.) will also be affected at the proposed
crossing location. Impact 1 comprises 0.07 acres of wetland impact.
Impact 3
In order to access the southeastern portion of the property it is necessary to cross a beaver
impoundment, also subject to the Riparian Buffer Rules. Impact 3 consists of 5,793
square feet (0.13 acre) of emergent wetland within a beaver impoundment. The proposed
crossing will impact approximately 133 linear feet of impounded water and 5,741 square
feet (Zone 1-3,632 sq. ft., Zone 2-2,109 sq. ft.) of riparian buffer.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the requirements for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge to a special aquatic
site such as wetlands is proposed. Total wetland impacts on site are 0.25 acres. The
applicant requested a detailed delineation of wetlands present on property prior to site
plan development in order to avoid jurisdictional wetlands to the maximum extent
practicable. However, an unnamed tributary to Little River is present on-site. This
tributary separates the eastern and western portions of the property. An additional beaver
impoundment must be impacted in order to access the southeastern portion of the
property. All roadway crossings will be constructed perpendicular to wetlands. Because
all roadway crossings will be constructed perpendicular to jurisdictional areas, and
because the applicant plans to maintain riparian buffers on all streams on-site and will
maintain the remaining 2.7 acres of wetlands through deed notifications, S&EC believes
the USACE should not require further compensatory mitigation for this project.
December 6, 2001
S&EC Project k 99-5099
Page 3 of 3
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for impacts to any stream
channel within the Neuse River Basin. Because the applicant plans to permanently
impact beaver impoundments subject to the buffer rules, S&EC requests written
concurrence that the project complies with the 401 Water Quality Certification associated
with the Nationwide Permits 39. NC-DWQ's current policy does not require wetland or
stream mitigation for wetland and stream channel impacts below 1 acre and 150 linear
feet per tributary. Because the total cumulative permanent impacts for the site is 0.25
acre of wetland, and because the permanent impacts to beaver impoundments/channels
are below 150 feet, S&EC believes that neither wetland nor stream mitigation should be
required by NC-DWQ.
As noted above, the two tributaries of the Little River on-site are subject to the buffer
rules. Little River, which constitutes the western boundary of the project, is also subject.
The cumulative riparian buffer impacts to beaver impoundments (Impacts 2 and 3) are
both less than 150 linear feet and less than 1/3 acre of buffer impacts. Current NC-DWQ
policy allows road crossing without mitigation if the impacts are less than or equal to 150
linear feet of stream channel or 1/3 acre of riparian buffer per tributary. Because the
project impacts are within these thresholds, S&EC believes that riparian buffer mitigation
should not be required.
Sincerely,

Todd Preuninger
Biologist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map (Figure 1)
Soil Survey Map (Figure 2)
Over-all Impact Map
Agent Authorization
Data Forms (USACE only)
Delineation Map (USACE only)
A040
of
-0
p
W ATF9
QG
b?
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.g=.mil/wetlands/Perm app.htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.gmy.mil/wetlands/regiour. htm or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U. S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http:/Ah2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page I of 11
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www saw usacearmy mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg.pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.ustncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U. S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 11
Office Use Only: Form Version Apri12001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
L Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: James A. Privette
Mailing Address: 12224 Louisburg Road
Wake Forest NC 27587
Telephone Number: 919-556-3300 Fax Number: 919-562-8131
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh North Carolina 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-5967
E-mail Address: Preuninger@a sandec com
n--- 17 ..r i 1
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fairfield Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Franklin County Nearest Town: Youngsville
Subdivision name (include phasellot number): Fairfield Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project site is located on the
south side of Tarboro Road (SR 1100) approximately one mile east of the intersection of
Mays Store Road (SR 1105) and Tarboro Road
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36° 00' 1" N, 78° 26' 5"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The site
contains a mixture of fallow fields and wooded lots.
7. Property size (acres): 133 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little River
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to construct
a residential subdivision
Page 4 of 11
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Typical heavy equipment
associated with grading and road construction.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Land use in the surrounding area is
primarily rural with some retail businesses located near Youngsville.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: No additional work is anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain"
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
Impact 1 Fill 0.07 NO 500 feet Emergent wetland
Impact 2 Fill 0.05 NO 0 feet Beaver Marsh
Impact 3 Fill 0.13 NO 0 feet Beaver Marsh
Page 5 of 11
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
* * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqJ/www.femagov.
sss List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina say, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: >3 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.25 acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma ear feet Before Impact lease speciho
NA NA NA NA NA NA
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gam),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditclimg/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mMuest.com etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Please note that the
streams present at the proposed road crossings have been impounded due to beaver activity,
therefore a defined channel is not present The areas in question consist of a combination of
open water and vegetated marsh Impacts to these areas are listed above as wetland impacts.
The combined culvert lengths for Impacts 1 and 2 are 261 linear feet
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.
Open Water Impact Area of of Waterbody Type
e of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound'
indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Page 6 of 11
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested a wetland delineation prior to developing the site plan so as to avoid
wetland impacts However, a beaver impoundment separates the eastern and western portions of
the prop. An additional beaver impoundment must be crossed in order to access the
southeastern portion of the property The proposed crossings will be made perpendicular to the
wetlands to minimize impacts. One of the proposed crossings will utilize an existing damn so as
to reduce wetland impacts The remaining wetlands on site will be maintained through deed
notifications.
VIII, Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htn-J.
Page 7 of 11
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreagellinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the applicant has minimized impacts through perpendicular crossing and will
maintain the remaining 2.7 acres of wetlands through deed notifications, we do not belive
mitigation should be required NC-DWQ's current policy does not require mitigation for
wetland or stream impacts below 1 acre or 150 feet per tributary, respectively Total
cumulative wetland impacts are 0.25 acres and less than 150 feet/channel, therefore we do
not believe wetland or stream mitigation should be required by the NC-DWQ
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hap://h2o.enr.state.nc.mgwmLnidex.htm if
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 8 of 11
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact 2
(square ffeet) Impact 3
(squarc feet Required
N iti tion
1 4,346 3,632 NA
2 2,406 2,109 NA
Total 6,752 5,741 NA
' Zone I extends out 30 teet perpendicular tram near bank of channel; [.one 1 ex[enas an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Currently the propeM contains a small amount of impervious acreage in the form of abandoned
farmhouses and a barn The subject property is approximately 135 acres in size The current site
plan shows 31 lots each 10-15 acres in size located on the property Given the lot size. we
believe impervious surface will be less than 30% Proper erosion and sediment control practices
and the riparian buffers are expected to protect water quality downstream
T..-- A -t 1 7
XIZ. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual Septic System --
XM. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer. Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
Lg
1.7
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabamus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Page 10 of 11
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
h and Wildlife Service / National N
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
*Croatan National Forest Only
[arine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276994617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 11 of 11
01/06/2002 20:38
Name:
9195628131
4198469467
SOILL 4C MARv?ron ? R?1?? b CW0IIpi 27614 • phase: (9191 da-
11010 RVO 1Bdo Road WWw.su)dX•com
AGF,NT AUTHOMATION FOWr doW WE
P ed
AI
AL/BOBBIE PRIVETTE
QOtL,r
PAGE 01
tal Consultantsi PA
e? .1x, c
Address: r t
done: 9 b ??
Project Nan*/dip
-c.5 2 9
be - e
pate:
-nle Department of the Army Krn Disbci?ct
U.S. Amy Coq" of g
p.0. »ox 404
wihx„ington, NC 28402
Atto' o
Meld Offiae:
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and T'm d"'ng
To YVhom It May Conc'enn:
hereb designate axul authoxiz?e 5oix d: Environmental Consultants, l'A to
Ti the current C owner, h po?n ?.
.
act in my behalf as my agent in the pW"AM of pemkit applhcat?ns, to forward. _ s -- day Of
suppkaWnW Wom atioxt in support of applications, etc. from this day The
.?G tn.bte, Zt70 /
This notificatim supersedes any previaus corresponde" concerning the agent for thin project,
NOTICE; TMs authorization, for liability and pro£eraforal comteey MAIM, is vxU Only for ;
goven ment officials to enter the property when accompanied, by S&RC staff. You should call MEC
to arrange a site mee ft prior to visiting the site.
Print property Owmes tame
cc:. Mr. John Domey
NMENR DWQ
2321 C.raWee Boulevard
RaWgh, NC 27604
overty Owner's Sigrtatux+e
cc: Mr. Todd PretuuMr
Soil & Environmental COMItants, P,A,
bW* "t &W 9M40C
cOtte off=, 010 Postm Road
P,?A9 291.3020+1 Pro$pedty C.haren Road 3817-E tAwn4ata sir ve TsyIcL#-,Uk, SC 29"1
t;huiotte, NC W69.7197 CMWbono, NC 27455
Pt?onc (E26) 635.5810
Phone: [phone] Phonr (336) 54"234
Fax; (704) 7209406 Pia! (336) 340-8_.3S Pan: [phone]
I• x 2W F ure 1- Location Ma
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
tl&W: i9 Tarboro Road Site P
rABMgr.:J ef91o? Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
James Privette Property (919) 8465900 • [phone]
Youngsvilie, Franklin Co., NC Web Page: www.SandEC.oom

?„'??' ;t'r.'• Ate` b'?r. " if ;?i3 `:;
J? }, .r ,
,?1a ?

r J J}?I

? ? ?"? ???f%.??? I ? I• it

s Site",;

44

t>??y
p

?1• { ? is t
>' ? , sir., , •1? A '•
1
?
' ,?{" r yi r
t ri
r ?x ? '
, ?

l _ ?x .?'
?1J1,?y. `r k , ,'1
V-

17?'

A

1q.

i

?1 Yv ryL1Y

g

cj\ ?} iy ?4, T j
, z,
A

}
-
1
O
'.
.
U
T ? r{ (Y

ure /
Fi /
ltants
l C
1 g ? Soil & Envir onsu
,
onmenta
® Soil Survey 1 w
w 11010 Rave n Ridge 1 Raleigh, 27614
Tarbom Road Site
t [phone] - [phone]
y
James PrIveb Proper Web Page: www.SandEC.cm
- - Youngsville, Franklin Co., NC
O
O Z
CCO,
z zc=n ..?
U a foe
5 -i %
p0 ? ? LL n, o ? ?b
CO)
o Sn Z
U O
J ?
ps 9011 S o Ac
UI) All
d W co
s
/ j
ILY
04
Z
s
N
r
C4 N
ZIH
0W
J
o
O ?°o
Q Z
O p CO ?
? Do
O © It co ap?
L = z
J$?e Q
?g O \ 0 O?
CCy33
W °
- -- LL. a
Z
R O .C
LIO
O
® o
0 0
0 1 --
0 1 o
O ? ' N N ?S
iu U"° ---• N C) CD M N
o LA
OO ?i ° O O o
g Id
00 04
v to n
i
% o W LL
m
/ I O 3
?zz
t\\\ ????/ ?/ Ctt:
NN
/ 7 ~ 0 Oif)
?
z°
."
O ?.
Q
o a
?0
0 0
Z o
1 I Q g 0 z
lz w 6 ?m8 g
Z,/ Ix (L"n z
?I - V
I o v,
i - W ?
N
= TO
? t Q N z
r S
a z ?o ire
J I
I'
Q? ?; o N
W ? t c?
I
' M
Ica
I
•1 j 3m
o=
z
N
00
? N
\ \ N N?
. \ .?? al
z r

\tz-Z?.
001
z
\,.\ 0
CL z?
\\t \ Q Cl)
a O ? o?
\5 ,` z a J?O N,
?N Z s a L
N v
? ? Q= z
?
z
? , t o
00
i
I 3S??N`
?noto I
Or-ON
ooo0' Ij 'I. y
ooM Ii .I a
N to i I
C4 C4 I Q
i I Z Z ?
y?N I o?
W?,_ I? I z ? ?Q
CW `? w
II I,
? N N W ?
v a?
O I "cq -
Vm V I °?? W
N y I ? ? I ??°
.? ? ? I I o 0
I hl?
Z
¦ .?
Z
~ z
U 0
O
co
?z z OZ
CO oa
z NZ
J om. ?
CL z
v ° p o'
,
i L LO
LL
3
? AMdOH;T o ?
N
Z
Lai.
7 ,
ON18V T10 g
LLJ
z Z z
I
N
W 11 ? `?-•.
I I ? I j
w
jz 0"qCY)ON I
> O 0000
m? MNO?'?
M
N M N
M I- N
7 ?Ww?
3 N N O
Ln ?- c
v a? c a
v? o 3
.Z U o
p m U N
:3 ID Z CND
03
1 3
9'r_s ?r'r f c L F i f I W • ? I 1 'I / - ?I ?"
Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA - j , -_
r ` =.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
4 3 3 8 ?'
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 7000 1670 0008 377
u\V Vy1
_-:11I' `r: 1 IIIiliifIfi[iif Milli III I]IIIiIIiillMIII I iiifilrilifJl Li