20200372 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20200311

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 Page 1

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 – Project
Description Brady Dodd, May 23, 2017/January 30, 2018 /February 28, 2020
Project Background:

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement
Boone Fork (Figure 1), in the Catawba River Basin, is classified by the state of NC as Class B, High
Quality Water (HQW). The Boone Fork stream channel has been disturbed by past management
in the area, including logging of the entire watershed to farming in the valley bottom. Three
levels of historic channel elevations were observed, indicating at least three notable events that
scoured and deepened the Boone Fork channel. Currently, the channel is moderately
entrenched with reduced access to its valley bottom, floodplain and tall eroding banks are
frequent (see Photo 1). Successful stream rehabilitation occurred upstream of this proposed
reach in 2012 under Permit Number 2012-01080. This proposed reach extends from below the
2012 project downstream to the Forest Service property boundary (Figure 1).

Other Proposed Work on Figure 1 Not Requiring a Permit Due to Silviculture Exemption:
FSR 2055 Drainage Improvements
The FSR 2055 road runs parallel to the Boone Fork valley bottom. Several storm water drainage
features send relatively large volumes of runoff from the road surface down the hill to the
Boone Fork channel. Downstream from these features storm flows have scoured ephemeral
channels and are sources of sediment to Boone Fork (Photos 2-4).

FSR 1167 Stream Crossing Improvement
The existing culvert on FSR 1167 crossing at Laurel Fork is eroded and impassable b y vehicles.
This road is gated year-round but used to access wildlife openings.

FSR 6089 & 966 Drainage Improvements & Deep Cove Aquatic Organism Passage
These system roads have had little attention through the years and maintenance is needed at
stream crossings and where erosion has been extensive. Also, the FSR 6089/966 crosses Deep
Cove with a squash pipe that is undersized and a barrier for passage of most aquatic organisms
(Photo 5).

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 Page 2

Figure 1. Site location of Boone Fork Watershed Improvement Project, including Boone Fork
Stream Enhancement.

Photo 1. Photo of Boone Fork, looking at eroded bank, May 11, 2017.

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 Page 3

Photos 2-4. Erosion from FSR 2055 road runoff to Boone Fork.

Photo 5. Culvert on Deep Cove undersized and a barrier for passage of most aquatic
organisms.
Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 Page 4

Project Description:

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement
Within this stream reach, work is proposed to stabilize erosion and sources of sedimentation,
improve aquatic habitat diversity, and improve floodplain access. This will be accomplished
using natural channel design techniques including the construction of instream structures such
as debris jams, log vanes and toe-wood revetment (Table 1), detailed in Appendix A – Structure
Specifications and Attachment 2. The channel’s natural dimension, pattern, and profile would
be reestablished in the constructed reach using reference reach information to establ ish a
stable stream channel with high quality aquatic habitat. See Attachment 1 for cross sections &
longitudinal profiles.

Table 1. Proposed action description for Boone Fork Stream Enhancement.
Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020
Site Current Condition Proposed Treatment (along the ~4,800 feet reach)
1 Eroded bank ~ 40'x4' Excavate Bankfull Bench & construct Log Vane (GPS: 36.00690,-81.61804)
2 Entrenched channel Construct Debris Jam at existing down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
3 Entrenched channel Construct Debris Jam at existing down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
4 Eroded bank ~ 30'x4' Construct Toe-wood Revetment along ~80' of right bank & reslope point bar
5 Entrenched channel with eroding
banks Construct Debris Jam at existing down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
6 Eroded bank Construct Log Vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat
7 Eroded bank ~ 40'x5' Construct Log Vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat
8 Entrenched channel with eroding
banks Construct Debris Jam at existing down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
9 Entrenched channel with eroding
banks
Construct Debris Jam where valley bottom narrows to enhance upstream deposition &
habitat
10
Overwidened channel, eroded
banks & headcut in ephemeral
channel
Construct Log vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat & Stabilize Headcut with
channel substrate.
11 Eroded bank ~ 100'x4' Construct Log Vane & construct a Debris Jam
12 Eroded bank ~ 150'x6' Construct Log Vane & construct a Debris Jam
13 Eroded bank ~ 80'x6' Construct Log Vane & ~60' of Toe-wood Revetment
14 Entrenched channel with eroding
banks Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
15 Eroded bank ~ 120'x4' Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
16 Eroded bank Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
17 Eroded bank ~ 60'x6' Construct Log Vane & 100' of Bankfull Bench.
18 Entrenched channel with eroding
banks Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat (GPS: 36.00760,-81.62965)
General Erosion control measures will be taken on all soil disturbed by the proposed work,
including seed, mulch, and Coir matting on stream banks

Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020 Page 5

APPENDIX A – STRUCTURE SPECIFICATIONS

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200372
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Brady N. Dodd
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/11 /2020
Nearest Body of Water
Boone Fork
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
Class B, HOW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.00755
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Caldwell
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-81.61958
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Amy Annino:eads\amannino
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
U

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
27 - Restoration
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. lathe project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
US Forest Service
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Hurston A. Nicholas
2d.Address
Street Address
National Forests in North Carolina
Address Line 2
160 Zillicoa St.
City
Asheville
Fbstal / Zip Code
28801
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
State / Ro ince / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
4a. Name:
Brady N. Dodd

4b. Business Name:
US Forest Service
4c.Address
Street Address
National Forests in North Carolina
Address tine 2
160 Zillicoa Street
City
Asheville
Postal / Zip Code
28801
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
DelegationCf Authority2016_Signed.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Morganton, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
NIA
Address tine 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Boone Fork
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Class B, HQW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501010503
4. Project Description and History
State / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
State / Rovince / Region
Country
397.51 KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Boone Fork, in the Catawba River Basin, is classified by the state of NC as Class B, High Quality Water (HOW). The Boone Fork stream channel has been disturbed by past
management in the area, including logging of the entire watershed to farming in the valley bottom. Up to three levels of historic channel elevations (terraces) were observed, indicating
that at least three notable events scoured and deepened the Boone Fork channel within the last few centuries. Historically, it is suspected that strearrflow had frequent access to its
valley bottom floodplain with frequent wetland type habitat formed by abundant down woody debris and beaver activity. Currently, the channel is entrenched with short segments where
a narrow floodplain bench is present. As a result stream banks are often tall, unstable and eroding. The occurrence of erosion increases in the downstream direction. Successful stream
rehabilitation occurred upstream of this proposed reach in 2012 under Permit Number 2012-01080. This proposed reach extends from belowthe 2012 project downstream to the Forest
Service property boundary.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
BooneFrk_WatershedlmprovementProject_2018.pdf 1.39MB

4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
BooneFrk_ Watershed Improvement_ 2018_Soil_Map.pdf
1.08 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
ApproArnately 3 miles of stream on Forest Service in the Boone Fork drainage
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to improve channel stability (stabilize banks and improve floodplain connectivity), increase aquatic habitat diversity and improve riparian vegetation.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Using a medium sized trackhoe within this stream reach, work is proposed to stabilize erosion and sources of sedimentation, improve aquatic habitat diversity, and improve floodplain
access. This will be accomplished using natural channel design techniques including the construction of instream structures such as debris jams, log vanes and toe -wood revetment,
detailed in the Project Description, Appendix A- Structure Specifications, and Attachment 2. The channel's natural dimension, pattern, and profile would be reestablished in the
constructed reach using reference reach information to establish a stable stream channel with high quality aquatic habitat. See Attachment 1 for cross sections & longitudinal profiles.
Boone Fork Stream Enhancement Project 2020
Site Current Condition Proposed Treatment (within the -5,000 feet reach)
1 Eroded bank - 40'x4' Excavate Bankfull Bench & construct Log Vane (GPS: 36.00690,-81.61804)
2 Entrenched channel Construct Debris Jam at eAsting down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
3 Entrenched channel Construct Debris Jam at eAsting down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
4 Eroded bank - 30'x4' Construct Toe -wood Revetment along -80' of right bank & reslope point bar
5 Entrenched channel with eroding banks Construct Debris Jam at eAsting down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
6 Eroded bank Construct Log Vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat
7 Eroded bank - 40'x5' Construct Log Vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat
8 Entrenched channel with eroding banks Construct Debris Jam at eAsting down tree to enhance deposition & habitat
9 Entrenched channel with eroding banks Construct Debris Jam where valley bottom narrows to enhance upstream deposition & habitat
10 Overwidened channel, eroded banks & headcut in ephemeral channel Construct Log vane to stabilize bank and create pool habitat & Stabilize Headcut with channel substrate.
11 Eroded bank - 100'x4' Construct Log Vane & construct a Debris Jam
12 Eroded bank - 150'x6' Construct Log Vane & construct a Debris Jam
13 Eroded bank - 80'x6' Construct Log Vane & -60' of Toe -wood Revetment
14 Entrenched channel with eroding banks Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
15 Eroded bank - 120'x4' Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
16 Eroded bank Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat
17 Eroded bank - 60'x6' Construct Log Vane & 100' of Bankfull Bench.
18 Entrenched channel with eroding banks Construct Debris Jam to enhance deposition & habitat (GPS: 36.00760,-81.62965)
General Erosion control measures will be taken on all soil disturbed by the proposed work, including seed, mulch, and Coir matting on stream banks
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Attachment l_BooneFork_Proposed_LongPro_CrossSectns.pdf 1.36MB
Attachment 2_BooneFork_StreamEnhancementProject_Specification. pdf 679.55KB
BooneFork_2020_ProjectDescription.pdf 1.51 MB
BooneFrk_ WI_Typicals_2020.pdf 1.01 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
Comments:
r No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
O Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
[D. Proposed Impacts Inventory "�

1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
F. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
(?) 11.1uriscliction*
length*
S1
Unstable stream bank
Permanent
Bank Stabilization J
Boone Fork
Perennial
Both
26
360
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S2
Unstable stream bed
Permanent
Excavation
Boone Fork
Perennial
Both
26
420
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S3
Unstable channel
Permanent
Fill
Boone Fork
Perennial
Both
h;;T�;]
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
1,230
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
1230
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
3j. Comments:
The stream impact linear distance is calculated for 18 sites with the -5,000 feet stream reach of Boone Fork.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation u
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Construction would occur in the presence of streamflow, but flowwould be diverted away from the work activity where feasible. Temporarily increases
in turbidity are likely from the work, but potential adverse impacts from turbidity would be avoided by minimizing excessive excavation and adhering to
the State turbidity standard. Work is expected to be completed over a 10-day period.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A. Minimize the area and degree of soil disturbance that reduces infiltration capacity and permeability, and destroys protective forest floor and ground
cover.
B. All hazardous materials will be stored outside of flood -prone areas and surrounded with sediment fence to reduce the risk of materials reaching the
river.
C. Work activities would not be scheduled on rainy days.
D. Heavy Equipment Operation.
1. All equipment shall be cleaned before entering the project area and stream, so as to reduce the risk of fine grained sediment and oils and grease
from entering the stream. This would also reduce the risk of invasive weed spread onto the Forest.
2. Do not operate on wet soils when they are most susceptible to damage and erosion.
3. Operate heavy equipment on slopes less than 12 percent so as to reduce the risk of soil erosion. Avoid operating heavy equipment on over-
hanging stream banks.
4. Move large woody debris in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the forest floor, exposure of mineral soil, or degradation of stream bank stability.
E. Install sediment fence to trap potential sediment. Stabilize any disturbed area at the end of each workday.
F. Re -vegetate exposed soils as soon as possible to take advantage of the loose soil conditions for seeding.
1. Exposed soil will be covered with straw mulch or erosion control matting at the end of the project. Matting will be secured in place with stakes and
live stakes where conditions allow.
2. Temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
3. Stabilize channel banks with a native seed mix as work is completed.
G. Do not move sediment trap devices until the vegetation in the disturbed areas has been established.
H. During on -going operations inspect the site frequently; inspect occasionally during inactive periods.
1. Check for potentially damaging or failing situations that may cause unacceptable water quality impacts.
2. Correct failing situations as soon as practical.
I. Conduct visual inspections of Boone Fork while the work is being conducted to maintain acceptable turbidity levels.
Use a skilled heavy equipment operator, trained in stream restoration and construction of in -stream structures. Instruct the operator to minimize
disturbance to the streambed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
This is a stream rehabilitation project
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
This project work will not create impervious areas since it is a stream rehabilitation project and will not need a Diffuse Flow Plan.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
r Yes r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?*
r Yes r No
NEPAor SEPA Final Approval Letter
20200114BooneForkWatershedlmprovementProjectDM_Signed.PDF 429.38KB
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes f• No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a stream rehab project and will not result in development but improve the forested environment
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r' Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No

5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
I consulted the NC Natural Heritage Database (Jan 2011 update) and the US FWS website — "Critical Habitat Mapper" to obtain species information.
Consultation Documentation Upload
19-388 USFS Boone Fork Watershed Improvement Project.pdf 129.69KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Data source is NOAA website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Conclusion is based on Archeology review of the project in 2018
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO_Concurrence.pdf 67.99KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Proposed work will restore flood access to the channels original floodplain within the National Forest
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Floodplain Mapping Information System http://floodmaps.nc.gov/FMIS/
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Brady N. Dodd
Signature
Date
3/11 /2020

Forest Service
s
File Code: 2500
Route To:
National Forests in North Carolina
Subject: Delegation of Authority
To: Brady Dodd
Date:
160A ZHUcoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-2574200
FAX: [phone]
March 17, 2016
You are hereby delegated the authority to act as my agent for all phases of the application
process for permits required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for watershed restoration
and improvement projects such as aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement, habitat
restoration, channel stabilization, and channel relocation on the National Forests in North
Carolina. You are authorized to make formal application for all permits to the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, provide all necessary
information, and sign all correspondence.
Include this letter as part of all applications for Section 404 permits to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Section 401 Water Quality Certification to the North Carolina Division of Water
Qualit .
i
HT RSTON A. NICHOLAS
Forest Supervisor
USDAM_ %JW
America's Working Forests —Caring Every Day in Every Way Printed ov Raycled Papc

Boone Fork Stream
Enhancement Reach,
~0.7 miles
Boone Fork Watershed Improvement Project
Soil Map—Caldwell County, North Carolina
(Boone Fork Stream Project_USFS)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2018
Page 1 of 33984500398480039851003985400398570039860003984200398450039848003985100398540039857003986000442800443100443400443700444000444300444600444900445200445500
442800 443100 443400 443700 444000 444300 444600 444900 445200 445500
36° 1' 1'' N 81° 38' 8'' W36° 1' 1'' N81° 36' 16'' W36° 0' 2'' N
81° 38' 8'' W36° 0' 2'' N
81° 36' 16'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
0 150 300 600 900
Meters
Map Scale: 1:12,800 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Caldwell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 26, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 15, 2014—Feb 5,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Caldwell County, North Carolina
(Boone Fork Stream Project_USFS)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2018
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
AcF Ashe-Chestnut complex,
escarpment, 50 to 95
percent slopes, very rocky
86.3 10.7%
BbA Bandana sandy loam, 0 to 3
percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
39.9 4.9%
CaF Chestnut-Ashe complex, 50 to
95 percent slopes, very
stony
82.9 10.3%
ChF Chestnut-Buladean complex,
50 to 95 percent slopes,
stony
81.3 10.1%
CkD Chestnut-Edneyville complex,
15 to 30 percent slopes,
stony
43.9 5.4%
CkE Chestnut-Edneyville complex,
30 to 50 percent slopes,
stony
184.1 22.8%
EvD Evard-Cowee complex,
escarpment, 15 to 30
percent slopes, stony
87.1 10.8%
EvE Evard-Cowee complex,
escarpment, 30 to 50
percent slopes, stony
124.9 15.5%
FoB Fontaflora-Ostin complex, 0 to
5 percent slopes, flooded
10.8 1.3%
HeC Hayesville loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
4.7 0.6%
TgD Tate-Greenlee complex, 15 to
30 percent slopes, very
stony
59.6 7.4%
W Water 1.2 0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 806.7 100.0%
Soil Map—Caldwell County, North Carolina Boone Fork Stream Project_USFS
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/27/2018
Page 3 of 3
Log Vane Detail
Bankfull elevationFlow directionConstructed
pool
LOGS PLACED AT A 20 –30O ANGLE
FROM BANK AND AT A 2 –6% SLOPE
FROM APPROX. ½ BANKFULL
ELEVATION, EXTENDING FROM
BANK TO 1/2 -1/3 OF CHANNEL
WIDTH
1/8 TO 1/4 OF END OF LOGS
BURIED IN STREAM BED
WITH BOULDER ON TOP AT
BED ELEVATION AS NEEDED
Flow directionBankfull elevation
A A’
PLACED RIVER ROCK
EXCAVATED FROM
POOL
NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
LOGS
Constructed
pool
TOPS OF TREES
BURIED UNDER
FABRIC & RIVER
ROCK
Construction of TOE WOOD (with Transplants) & Bankfull Bench Typical
Bankfull
Stage
Pre-construction Channel Bottom
Low Flow
Stage
CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL
BOTTOM
CONSTRUCTED TOE
WOOD BENCH
CONSTRUCTION ITEMS AND SEQUENCE:
1.Excavate upper bank to construct a minimum 2:1 slope from
bankfull to terrace elevation.
2.Divert streamflow from bank.
3.Excavate & construct toe wood bench and new channel pool
feature based on reference pool dimensions.
4.Place foundation logs on bench @ 15-25⁰ angle from bank and
place root wad logs cantilevered over foundation logs
5.Place filler material (e.g., trees, logs, tops (woody debris)) parallel
to root wads.
6.Add temporary counter weight to submerge logs & place shallow
backfill on logs.
7.Remove temporary weight & place live stake cuttings on toe
wood, and place backfill over cuttings.
8.Place coir matting back to the bank, leaving remaining matting
hanging over the front of the toe wood to be pulled up over the
transplants/soil/hay bales in a “Burrito”.
9.Excavate shrub transplants (e.g., alder, spicebush, willow) and
place on toe wood up to bankfull elevation; these may need to be
layered to reach bankfull elevation. Place live stake cuttings
between layers (when available).
10.Seed bank with native seed & cover transplants and sloped bank
with coir erosion control matting.
11.Plant live stakes into transplants/hay bales and bank to help “pin”
sod into bank.
12.Pl ant trees and shrubs on upper bank.
TOE WOOD
TRANSPLANTS/SOIL/HAY BALES
EXCAVATED
BANK
MATERIAL
Brady Dodd
NFNC Hydro
UPPER BANK
2:1
Pre-construction Channel Bank
BACKFILL & CUTTINGS
LIVE STAKES
Cross Section
Terrace elevation
USDA
DECISION MEMO
BOONE FORK WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
U.S. FOREST SERVICE
GRANDFATHER RANGER DISTRICT
CALDWELL COUNTY, NC
BACKGROUND
Boone Fork Watershed Improvement
Boone Fork (Figure 1), in the Catawba River Basin, is classified by the state of NC as Class B,
High Quality Water (HQW). The Boone Fork stream channel has been disturbed by past
management in the area, including logging of the entire watershed to farming in the valley
bottom. Three levels of historic channel elevations were observed, indicating at least three
notable events that scoured and deepened the Boone Fork channel. Currently, the channel is
largely functioning properly in an altered state; moderately entrenched with reduced access to its
valley bottom, floodplain. There are, however, sections of excessive streambank instability and
erosion.
The FSR 2055 road runs parallel to the Boone Fork valley bottom, although located upslope
often more than 100 feet. Several storm water drainage features send relatively large volumes of
runoff from the road surface down the hill to the Boone Fork channel. Downstream from these
features storm flows have scoured ephemeral channels and are sources of sediment to Boone
Fork. The existing culvert on FSR 1167 crossing at Laurel Fork is eroded and impassable by
vehicles. This road is gated year-round but.used by the NC WRC for maintenance of wildlife
openings.
The FSR 6089 & 966 system roads have had little attention through the years and maintenance is
needed at stream crossings and where erosion has been extensive. Also, the FSR 6089/966
crosses Deep Cove with a squash pipe that is undersized and a barrier for passage of most
aquatic organisms.
— Decision Memo —
Page 1 of 6

USDA
BOONE FORK WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
'-: ,, •� _ _ ,��, �STAZ=EROWONAT
FSR608A1129SWML10W ..
L4IPRCYVEROADCROSSLWON� (�
FSR3167/LAT7BII.FORY ., �r;-, �-p US. � A Fi
REPLACEDUSrING
CULVERTNIIH
f - AOF CROSSQ7G
,, ` t 1 ;C /• i .y � STAEM=ER090N&
REPAIACROSawrcoN R
rmgffi/RA0000NCOVE
,l `._.
STnmr%nEA05EONON L
r5R9fi6 fig`
' y % /y q �1 �Y
"A iNEr iRY STREAM A' V' it E 8
' f IINYAOVEROADDRAUU EON.. EMIANCENUNTREACK N,- Lei
TMROADSFCTEON-OJMIIFS f
Figure 1. Boone Fork watershed improvement project area.
DECISION
I have decided to implement the Boone Fork Watershed Improvement Project on the Grandfather
Ranger District.
Within the Boone Fork watershed, road improvements, bank stabilization and habitat
improvement work is planned including:
1) Stabilize eroding stream banks in reaches of Boone Fork (approximately 2,500 feet) by
pulling back banks to a stable slope and constructing a bankfull/floodplain bench where
feasible. These slopes will be covered with matting, sown with native seed and planted
with woody species of native vegetation.
2) Placement of large wood and boulders to form structures in Boone Fork that are designed
to redirect streamflow energy away from erodible banks and improve aquatic habitat
diversity, e.g. more pool habitat.
3) On the NFSR 2055 road the project will stabilize scoured channels downstream from
road drainage features, and increase ditch relief culverts to more frequently disseminate
storm runoff.
4) On the NFSR 1167 reestablish the eroded road crossing of Laurel Fork with a constructed
ford.
5) On NFSR 6089 stabilize the culvert outlet at the Benson Hollow crossing. On NFSR 966
replace failing culvert with a ford or larger culvert on Raccoon Cove and stabilize sources
of road failure and erosion further south on the road. Remove the FSR 6089/966 crossing
on Deep Cove and replace it with a constructed natural bottom ford. The Forest Service
— Decision Memo —
Page 2 of 6

USDA
gate is located over the culvert, therefore that gate would need to be relocated closer to
the junction with the main road (NFSR 2055), and maintain closure of the gate to limit
access across the ford to administrative use.
In addition to disturbance in the stream channel there will be trees pushed over by a medium-
sized trackhoe working within 100' either side of the channel. Trees will be cut and used in the
construction of in stream structures. The following design features will be followed to avoid
undesired effects:
1. Implementation of in stream work will occur outside the moratorium of October 15-April
15.
2. Avoid species of trees with exfoliating bark in order to minimize risk of disturbing
roosting bats.
This action is categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement
(EIS) or an environmental assessment (EA). The applicable category of actions is identified in
agency policy as: Removing, replacing or modifying water control structures to restore the flow
of waters into natural channels and floodplains 32.2 (18) e of categorical exclusion and CFR
citation as described in FSH 1909.15 Sec. 31.2). This category of action(s) is applicable because
this project has been designed to "restore flow into natural channels and floodplains" that was
previous manipulated into "unnatural" conditions.
I find that there are no extraordinary circumstances that would warrant further analysis and
documentation in an EA or EIS. I took into account resource conditions identified in agency
procedures that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances might
exist:
• Based on the findings contained in the Biological Evaluation:
o The Boone Fork Watershed Project would not affect any federally proposed,
threatened, or endangered aquatic or botanical species because species and/or
habitat are not known to occur within the. proposed activity or analysis area.
Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is not required for botanical
or aquatic resources.
o This project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the northern long-
eared bat. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is not required for
northern long-eared bat for this project; however, the 4(d) rule requires the Forest
Service to notify the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the proposed action 30
days prior to implementation.
o The proposed project will not affect any Sensitive species (except Hexastylis
contracta/mountain heartleaf) because species are not known to occur within the
proposed activity or analysis area. This proposal may impact individuals of
mountain heartleaf, but is not likely to adversely impact the overall population
viability.
o This proposal may also affect terrestrial and aquatic individuals of Forest
— Decision Memo —
Page 3 of 6

USDA
Concern, including Diana fritillary (Speyeria diana) and several
macroinvertebrates (Ephermerella floripara, Ophiogomphus mainensis, Baetopus
trishae, and Bolotoperla rossi); however, no impacts to population viability for
these species are expected to occur.
• Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds — The floodplains of these stream
improvement projects will improve with implementation. No wetlands or municipal
watersheds are present.
• Congressionally designated areas such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national
recreation areas — None exist.
• Inventoried roadless areas or potential wilderness areas — None exist.
• Research natural areas — None exist.
• American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites — None exist.
• Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas — The road work in this decision was
considered an exempt undertaking by USFS Archeologist, Scott Ashcraft, which
concludes the activities are in compliance with the programmatic Memorandum of
Understanding between the National Forest of North Carolina, North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and Tribes. As such Tribal and NC SHPO
concurrence is not necessary. Consultation with the NC SHPO for the stream restoration
and stabilization work was completes in compliance with section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. The NC SHPO concurs that the three sites discovered during
survey are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Therefore,
this project will not affect any cultural or historic sites.
These restoration projects have been designed to have a positive impact on the long-term health
and viability of the watersheds involved.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
This action was originally included within the project titled Pisgah Zone Watershed
Improvement Projects FY2018 Grandfather Ranger District. This project was first published in
the Pisgah National Forest Schedule of Proposed Actions on 03/30/2018 and was updated
periodically during project development. This project was also developed within a collaborative
group as part of the Grandfather Ranger District Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration
Project (CFLRP). These actions meet one of the primary goals of the CFLRP which is to
"Restore riparian vegetation, remove fish passage barriers, reduce sedimentation and reconnect
streams to their floodplains to benefit water quality and aquatic ecology."
The CFLRP collaborative involves many partners. State and national natural resource
management agencies involved in the project include the National Forests in North Carolina,
North Carolina Forest Service, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources, National Park Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service.
Local environmental conservation organizations include Wild South, Western North Carolina
— Decis"on Memo —
Page 4 of 6

USDA
Alliance, Foothills Conservancy, Southern Area Wilderness Stewards, Land of Sky Regional
Council, Friends of Wilson Creek, and the Grandfather Mountain Stewardship Foundation.
National conservation organizations with local presence include The Nature Conservancy and
The Wilderness Society. Special interest wildlife groups include Trout Unlimited, National Wild
Turkey Federation, and Quality Deer Management Association. Special interest recreation trails
groups include the Southern Area Wilderness Stewards and the volunteer trails coordinator for
the Linville Gorge Wilderness Area. Research partners include the Southern Blue Ridge Fire
Learning Network, the Forest Service Southern Research Station, Forest Stewards, and Western
Carolina University. The local wood -products industry is represented by Appalachian Designs.
FINDINGS REQUIRED BY OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This decision is consistent with the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forest Land Management
Plan. According to direction for management area 18 (riparian resources), soil and water
management should "protect the integrity of the stream system including channel, banks and
stream bottom (LRMP III-187). This project also adheres to the Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C.
§1251 et seq. (1972) by "restoring watersheds and their aquatic ecosystems to provide for
healthy habitat for fish, plants and wildlife." (EPA, Office of Water Standards).
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW (APPEAL) OPPORTUNITIES
This decision is not subject to administrative review and appeal.
CONTACT
For additional information concerning this decision, contact: Brady Dodd, USFS Hydrologist
[phone].
Nicholas Larson
Grandfather District Ranger
— Decision Memo —
Page 5 of 6
Date

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the
basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status,
parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part
of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and
TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence
Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is
an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Page 6of6

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
December 12, 2019
Richard Thornburgh
National Forests in North Carolina
632 Manor Road
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Cultural Resources Survey of the Pisgah Stream Restoration Project, Appalachian and Grandfather
Ranger Districts, Pisgah National Forest, Buncombe and Caldwell Counties, ER 19-4960
Dear Mr. Thornburgh:
Thank you for your letter of November 12, 2019, concerning the above -referenced project. We have
reviewed the archaeological survey report by Southeastern Archaeological Services and offer the following
comments.
Six sites were located within the project areas. For the purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that five sites (31BN1077, 31BN1077, 31CW485, 31CW486,
and 31CW487) are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. These sites do not retain
sufficient subsurface integrity or artifact density to yield information important to history or prehistory.
We concur that 31BN1078 is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria D.
This site has the potential to yield significant information regarding the Middle and/or Late Woodland
period occupation in the Appalachian Province. Preservation by avoidance was recommended. If this site
cannot be avoided by restoration activities, mitigation against the adverse effect would be necessary. We
concur with these recommendations.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.review aincdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
k=/Ramona M. Bartos
U' Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

September 27, 2019

Ms. Tara Anderson
Pisgah Zone Wildlife Biologist
National Forests in North Carolina
109 E. Lawing Drive
Nebo, North Carolina 28761

Dear Ms. Anderson:

Subject: Biological Evaluation for the Proposed Boone Fork Watershed Improvement Project,
Grandfather Ranger District, Pisgah National Forest, Caldwell County, North Carolina

On August 27, 2019, we received (via e-mail) a copy of the Biological Evaluation (BE) and
Project Description from you. We have reviewed the information that you provided. The
following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).

The Grandfather Ranger District is proposing several actions stream enhancement and
stabilization projects within the Boone Fork watershed to improve water quality and aquatic
organism passage. The project consists of the following actions: 1) Boone Fork Stream
Enhancement – A section of Boone Fork will be enhanced to stabilize erosion and sources of
sedimentation and improve aquatic habitat. Natural channel design techniques including the
construction of instream structures (log vanes and toe wood stuctures) will be used to re-establish
natural dimension, pattern, and profile to increase stream channel stability and high quality
aquatic habitat.; 2) FSR 2055 Drainage Improvements - Stabilize scoured channels downstream
from road drainage features including culvert outlets and locations of channel bottom instability
and add additional ditch relief culverts to the road to reduce stormflow reaching the unstable
locations.; 3) FSR 1167 Stream Crossing Improvement – Re-establish the eroded road crossing
of Laurel Fork Creek with a constructed ford.; 4) FSR 6089 and 966 Drainage Improvements and
Deep Cove Aquatic Organism Passage – Stabilize the culvert outlet at the Benson Hollow
crossing on FSR 6089. Replace a failing culvert with a ford or larger culvert at the FSR 966
crossing of Raccoon Cove and stabilize sources of road failure and erosion further south on the
road. Remove the FSR 6089/966 crossing on Deep Cove and replace it with a constructed natural
bottom ford.

2
As indicated in the BE, the project sites are within areas that contain suitable summer maternity
roosting habitat for northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), which is currently federally
listed as a threatened species. Per the 4(d) rule established for this species, any federal action is
exempted from take if the project does not occur within ¼-mile of a known hibernacula or within
150-feet of a known maternity roost tree. We concur with your conclusion that no known
hibernacula occurs within ¼-mile of the site and no known summer roost trees occur within 150-
feet of the site as the nearest known record for this species is about 10-miles from the project
site. Further, if trees must be removed to accommodate the project, the USFS has agreed to
assess the trees for summer maternity roosting suitability. If the trees are confirmed to contain
suitable summer maternity roosting habitat, the USFS will either select different trees or remove
the trees outside of the recommended April 15-October 15 tree clearing moratorium. For these
reasons, we concur with your “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for this
species. Additionally, we do not believe the project will have any adverse effects to other
federally listed species known to occur in Caldwell County. Therefore, the requirements under
section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7
of the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of
this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and request that you continue to keep
us informed as to the progress of this project. If we can be of assistance or if you have any
questions, please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 42240. In any
future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-19-388.