20011538 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20011019

TOWN OF HIGHLANDS
HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA`
September 23, 2002 e51d`^
_ L
Division of Water Quality
Local Government Assistance Unit
ATTN: Milt Rhodes
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Rhodes:

OCT 220 r
On September 18, 2002, the Board of Commissioners
held a public hearing and discussed several proposed
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, including the
amendment which you forwarded in your letter of July
16,2002, with the statement that the Ordinance "must
be revised:"
"Within-the WS-III-BW Watershed Overlay
District,-a minimum one hundred (100) foot
vegetative buffer for development activities
that exceed the low-density standards as
established in this Ordinance is required
along all perennial.waters indicated on the
most recent version of the U.S.G.S. 1:24,000
(7.5 minute) scale topographic maps,
otherwise a minimum thirty (30) foot
vegetative buffer is required. Desirable
artificial streambank or shoreline
stabilization is permitted."
After considerable discussion, the Board agreed to
take the amendment which you drafted under advisement;
they requested that I write a letter to you asking for
clarification.
I am enclosing an excerpt from the minutes of that
meeting for your information. As you can see, the
phrase which the Board questioned in the amendment you
drafted was "development activities that exceed the
low-density standards as established in this
Ordinance." In discussing this with Town Staff, some
confusion rema"ins concerning whether or not the.Town is
subject to.low-density standards.
The Town was under the impression when it adopted
these Watershed provisions in 1993 that it had the.
option of adopting either the so-called "low-density
option" or the "high-density option." The Model
Ordinance, which we and every other municipality in the
state apparently used, clearly states:
(CONTINUED)
P.O. BOX 460 HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA 28741 [phone] [phone] FAX [phone]
Printed on Recycled Paper
Page Two
Letter to Milt Rhodes
September 23, 2002
"Under the low-density option used in this
ordinance, local governments with a WS-II'
and/or a WS-III watershed area as defined on
July 1, 1993, are allowed to establish a
procedure by which five percent of the
balance of-watershed-area outside the
critical area can be developed non-
residentially up to 70 percent built-upon
without requiring stormwater control."
The commentary goes on to say, "in contrast, under the
high-density option, any new development exceeding the
low density requirements must utilize stormwater_
controls," and both it and the Rules themselves refer
to a 100-foot buffer "for all new development
activities that exceed the low-density requirements
otherwise a minimum 30-foot-vegetative buffer
for development 'is required."
Your reading of the'Model Ordinance and the Rules
seems to be based on the assumption that, whenever the
"special non-residential intensity allocation"--that
is, the 70% built-upon/5% watershed requirement that is
specifically provided for the low-density option--is
used, it automatically becomes "high-density."
This question was raised in a letter dated June 17
from,,Town Administrator, Richard Betz, who was the Town
Planner at the time the Ordinance was adopted. He has
reported to us that he discussed these' amendments in
great detail with DWQ personnel at the-time, and that
they reviewed our Ordinance with a "fine-tooth comb."
Our Board agrees with the comment he made at the
meeting, that your letters have "evaded this question."
As Mr. Betz pointed out, too, our confusion was
compounded in the Regions Bank case when the Town
received a letter on December 10, 200i, from Michael R.
Parker, Environmental Chemist from the Asheville_
Regional Office-in your Division, stating: "the stream
is classified as WS-III waters which-means it is
protected for public water supply. There is a 30-foot
buffer requirement associated with all WS-III waters."
We note-that your letter referred to "the
previously and erroneously approved ordinance" which
(CONTINUED)
Page Three
Letter to Milt Rhodes
September 23, 2002
the-Town adopted nine years ago. However, we
understand that you informed Mr. Gantenbein that more
than fifty municipalities are being required to amend
their "previously and erroneously approved ordinances."
We -suspect that, rather than being an "error," this may
very well indicate a policy-change in your Division,
increasing the 30-foot buffer to a 100-foot buffer
through back-door, administrative policy, rather than
through a State legislature that would not enact a 100-
foot buffer when it adopted the Watershed Protection
Act.
.If that is.the case, we must object,-in the
strongest of terms. Surely you are aware that the Town
willingly adopted a 50-foot buffer requirement in-its
critical area for all development, and that the Town.
strictly applies built-upon standards for non-
conforming lots, rather than simply "grand-fathering"
them. Both of these provisions go far beyond what was
required by the Watershed Protection Act, and should
indicate the Town's commitment to the intent of this
legislation. However, a 100-foot buffer in our
commercial area would have a profound impact on the
ability of property owners to reasonably use their
property.
On behalf of the Board of commissioners, we would
ask that you clarify this matter by informing us if we
are under the low-density or the high.density option,
.
and therefore whether or not the 100-foot buffer would
apply. We would also appreciate it if you would give
your reasons for this interpretation.
Sincere-iy .,yours
f
1 L. rott
Mayor
cc: Board of Commissioners
Larry Gantenbein, Watershed Administrator
William Coward, Town Attorney
Steve Zoufaly, Division of Water Quality
John Dorney, Division of.Water.Quality
Excerpt from Minutes of the Board of Commissioners for
September 18. 2002:
"The Board considered the following amendment.
Replace Section 211.7(A) with the following: "Within the WS-
III-BW Watershed Overlay District, a minimum one hundred (100)
foot vegetative buffer-for development activities that exceed
the low-density standards as established in this Ordinanceis
required along all perennial waters indicated on the most
recent version of the U.S.G.S. 1:24,000.(7.5 minute) scale
topographic maps, otherwise a minimum thirty (30) foot
vegetative. buffer is required. Desirable artificial streambank
or shoreline stabilization is permitted."
The Board discussed the proposal at some length. The.
Town Planner reminded the Board that the proposed
amendment had been drafted by the Division of Water
Quality, and the Town had been requested to adopt it as
soon as possible. Comm. Patterson expressed some-
concern over the limitation of the definition of.
"perennial waters;" she-pointed out that there were
several streams in Town which were not identified on
the U.S.G.S. maps which were nevertheless perennial.
The Town Administrator said that this issue had been
discussed when the Watershed amendments had originally
been adopted, and he understood the Town could identify
additional streams on the Zoning Map if there was
evidence that.they were perennial. Comm. Ross asked if
the-100-foot buffer would apply irrespective of:__.:.,
property lines, and he was told that it would. Comm.
James said that he was not certain what was meant by
"low-density standards," and whether or not the DWQ
agreed with the Town as to when they were "exceeded;"
he-said that the recent Regions Bank application had
been a case in point. The Town Administrator said that
his understanding was that the Ordinance had been
adopted, and approved by DWQ, pursuant to the low-
density standards, and therefore the 100-foot buffer
would not apply; he also commented that letters from
the Division of Water Quality had in his opinion evaded
this question. Comm. James suggested that the Board
take the proposed amendment under advisement, and that
the Mayor write a letter to the Division of Water
Quality asking it to clarify whether or not the Town is
subject to "low-density standards."
MOVED BY COMM. JAMES, SECONDED BY COMM. CAVENDER, AND
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED TO TAKE THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT
UNDER ADVISEMENT, AND TO ASK THE MAYOR TO WRITE TO THE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ASKING FOR CLARIFICATION."
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 21, 2002
C. Brek Patterson
Regions Bank
PO Box 2379
Highlands, NC 28741
Subject: Stormwater Bioretention Areas
Regions Bank
Macon County, NC
DWQ# 011538
Dear Mr. Patterson:
This Office is in receipt of the plans dated August 5, 2002 for the stormwater management bioretention
areas at the subject facility prepared on your behalf by Philip Ward and submitted to the Division on August 21,
2002. Staff from the Wetlands Unit reviewed the plans and found them acceptable. Please note that this
approval is for water quality purposes only and shall not be construed as an approval of the design for
dam/outlet structure integrity, Dam Safety, public safety, or flood attenuation purposes.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone]
cc:
C?-
J n R. Dor y
etl nds Unit Superviso
Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlands U '
Asheville Regional Office
Phil Ward, PA, PO Box 2742, Cashiers, NC 28717
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
F WATF
O
RQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
Cl) ? William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> , I Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 21, 2002
Memorandum To: John Dorney
rrom: Todd St. John
Subject: Regions Bank
Macon County
DWQ# 011538
I reviewed the bioretention areas proposed for the subject project and they appear to be
acceptable. As such, I recommend that we approve the stormwater management plan.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftp://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/
P h i l i p Ward AMERICAN soc" rv OF LAN
Landscape Architect, RA.
LAND PLANNING- WE DESIGN-CONSTRUCTION MM
I CLARB CERTIFIED
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
Mr. Todd St. John, PE
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
August 10, 2002
48 Links Drive* P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717
Ph.4828-743~9951 • Fax[phone] • Cell- SZ0E8793 • E-mail wardl @dnetnet
xfPD ? ? ?
AU
52002
1 F
Wrr, AIDS G
r m
~T'R UACIflou
TYSfCf1;;r,,
RE: Regions Bank, DWQ Project No. 011538, Macon County
1 have enclosed the completed forms, calculations and drawings that you requested to
complete your review of the stormwater management plans for the above referenced
project. More specifically, those items include the Bioretention Area Operation and
Maintenance Agreement, the, Bioretention Area Worksheets, and sheets C3 & C4 of the
construction drawings that were revised to include under drains beneath the planting soil
and sand bed.
Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely;
R
Philip Ward, ASLA
REGIONS BANK
HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA
BIORETENTION AREA OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows:
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly inspect the
bioretention area for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation, vegetated cover, and
general condition.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-sod drainage ways as necessary to maintain good vegetative
cover, mow grass to maintain a maximum height of three inches, and remove trash as needed.
3. Inspect and repair the overflow collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap, etc.)
quarterly to maintain proper functioning.
4. Remulch any void area whenever needed by hand.
5. Remove previous mulch layer and apply new mulch once every two or three years in the spring.
6. Add additional mulch in the spring.
7. Remove and replace all dead and diseased vegetation considered beyond treatment as needed to
maintain the required plant cover as originally specified and installed.
8. Treat all diseased trees and shrubs that can be saved.
9. Water plants as required for healthy plant growth.
10. Soil testing shall be conducted annually so that the accumulation of toxins and heavy metals can
be detected or prevented. Removal and replacement of the entire soil base, as well as the plant
material, may be required if toxins and heavy metal accumulations are too high.
11. Soil testing shall be conducted annually to determine pH of the organic layer and soil. Limestone
shall be applied according to the soil test as required.
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the eleven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to
any changes to the system or responsible parry.
I, J t-b w-n -qa P. g S a?-- , a Notary Public for the State of North Carolina, County
of . />A-a c*Y--, do hereby certify that OIW, 'Q )64'"
Personally appeared before me this `??"-? day of ems- 1 6-0 o a ,and acknowledge
the due execution of the forgoing bioretention area maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and
official seal. 6DSEAL My commission expires -3 . a , 6 7

DWQ Project No. O 1 1 of &
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name
Contact Person: 'pal lI ?_ W b?1Z17 Phone Number: (90b -74 3-:n
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Surface Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Bioret ntion Surface Area
Drains a Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Precipitation Event
Inlet Velociiy
Inlet flow depth
Depth'to Ground Water
*Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
#In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
Z O ft.
4311 .°15 ft.
0100 sq. ft.
0" 1 ac.
©,'ZO511 ac.
©. "TS
0i in
fps
in
ft.
s tlb'fV-- -in./hr.
,Nb_TV,` in./hr.
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(surface area elevation)
(elevation of outlet invert)
(surface area at surface elevation)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 0.5 in w/sand under drain or 0.7 in w/o)
TWO ( NW_f,?? #7 310 ?OFV?
?tA to 617
(the soil layer down to 4 feet)
(the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)

Initial-in the space provided to indicate the following "design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why.
No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet.
Sheet flow is provided at inlet. - 3' G uP-g t7ff2441 N 6 Lj
Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
of 6" ponding is provided. MAXI MM ex ?
MQr
The ponded area will draw down in less. than 4 days.
Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
2tr Practices Manual, April 1999)
Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
A signed and notarized operation and maintenance "agreement is provided.
1? RM W6 ?01 W F?eFM?P W I fl THI? fWvM M
4N 1G MA-rgrI& ? .?
e,o*'oM MoN d e-0 Y, ??Nt2 MV 0 P5t
FFO?*tqw-Tr,A-rl WZ717,tU
VZ5-?Ior44F IK-
?IO??f?N1?a?
??°?T?N?aN( p?? #1
,74
Cum 52M,41 ! = ©t-7 atOx eTe7
?? Ff' ? = - ? 0.24 = 2r°l
Q ?= 3' 0,741 = Ot-7Z S
is - . ?c
V= - - I I r7
O 77 7- /-;f
N WT t f KAia`aJPYZ t 47 ;W WSW
1.? SutT,& AN ?NM-T V54*OG IT-(
Ee-Fs N I H 6 12 Qzq = O ?-7$? o p ?z?i= I, to G,
00, H= 17 A=
o - D?1
o) (3, o)
1/?I?CtY- ? _ ? ? Co =
? ?
019-77 l 71=r? (0. ?K, Fvp
DWQ Project No. ©1 163e
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
1Z_ akkiv_
Project Name
Contact Person: Phone Number:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
Surface Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
.t
Bioret tion Surface Area
Drains a Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Precipitation Event
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
'Depth'to Ground Water
?tE Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
• 4 ft. (surface area elevation)
:F)g10,525 ft. (elevation of outlet invert)
&00 sq. ft. (surface area at surface elevation)
0. ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
© .Z,Q) ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
. 5 in (either 0.5 in w/sand under drain or 0.7 in w/o)
I r_7 116-1 2+ P
2-
?
l 17 15-k6H-,
v, '© ft.
Si;E ? ., in./hr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
SE?f, ND-Ifi in./hr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial, the space provided to indicate the following "design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why.
No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet.
Sheet flow is provided at inlet. 3' G. U V.S O*F6N / NG91 47
Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
1fiffli-mang of 6" ponding is provided. MA4 I MUM u-J The ponded area will draw down in less. than 4 days.
Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
!542&4&1_Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
Plan details for the bioretention area provided. -
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
I A signed and notarized operation and maintenance 'agreement is provided.
-rw? FL,4.N711? G011 W i LL PFeFAF?V 1?C "T?>? F660mmewr-,p
X?pb5L t iqN. vF LAY ???? ?Nv ©???I?l IG M/? eFV-1, P Fof V I N F I 0 /&4QP FLMT <-z-??T-E Fclz
??%iE ?N uNbG'? l?l N SF? ? 1'NS1 Er-I.6W 'AI?_ *JD F?D
iN-?I'N Z-791 L it??'1?1??ia?l g&1?,
'f??GG lal?l? ?r.4K
?ib?PEhl'fiofJ p?'? #2
Two - cveN ! rlAT I N
0-4)c S,o x o,
zC7-
1,4
FLOW V?
A= 40,29 M57
1 4 4F47 W Fr,?
o, 2>7e7f
o,,T4 <Oo)4oir
T UF-5 OMN106 F14RT QZ
FFLOW
v
31
A 0, r34 e7f
a1-7i cFs
0 ,=54
Project No. DWQ Regions Bank
Project Name: 011538
SUBMITTED DESIGN:
elevations
Permanent Pool (ft) 3812
Temporary Pool (ft) 3811.95
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 900
Drainage Area (ac) 0.51
Impervious Area (ac) 0.39
Rational C 0.75
Precipitation (in) 0.5
volumes
S * i
REQUIRED DESIGN:
-0.05 ft. depth
cth
833 sq. ft.
ac
76.5 % impervious
sand underdrain
ok
Inlet Velocity l 1.7 0 fps check veloci
Inlet Flow Depth 3.7 in
Depth to Ground Water 9 6 ft
Planting Soil Infiltration 0.6 0.52 in/hr ok
In-Situ Soil Infiltration na #VALUE! in/hr ok
Project No. DWQ Regions Bank
Project Name: 011538
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations
Permanent Pool (ft) 3810.4 -0.05 ft. depth
Temporary Pool (ft) 3810.35
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft) 600 596 sq. ft.
Drainage Area (ac) 0.37 ac
Impervious Area (ac) 0.28 75.7 % impervious
Rational C 0.74
Precipitation (in) 0.5 sand underdrain
volumes
Inlet Velocity 1.6 0 fps
Inlet Flow Depth 3.5 in
Depth to Ground Water 10 6 ft
Planting Soil Infiltration 0.6 0.52 in/hr
In-Situ Soil Infiltration na #VALUE! in/hr
check depth
ok
check veloci
ok
ok
O?Of W A T FRQG
? c
-> s- ."-
o ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 17, 2002
Mr. Philip Ward, ASLA
Philip Ward Landscape Architect, PA
PO Box 2742
Cashiers, NC 28717
Dear Mr. Ward:
Subject: Regions Bank
DWQ Project No. 011538
Macon County
The Wetlands Unit staff reviewed the stormwater management plans for the subject project and determined that additional
information is necessary to complete the technical review process. The required additional information is as follows:
1. Worksheet
In order to expedite the review, it is recommended that you fill out the attached worksheet (also available at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.htmi) for each bioretention area. Please note that if the in situ soil
does not have adequate infiltration, under drains can be proposed (beneath the planting soil).
2. Operation and Maintenance Agreement
An operation and maintenance agreement is required. Typical requirements for an operation and maintenance plan
include the following:
• Vegetation management/mowing schedule
• Semi-annual inspections
• Debris check after every storm event
• Benchmark for sediment removal (specific elevations listed)
• Designation of a responsible party
The operation and maintenance agreement must also be signed by the responsible party and notarized. An
example agreement for an extended detention wet pond is available on line at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/oandm.doc.
Division wetlands unit staff will strive to complete a final technical review within 10 working days of receipt of the
requested information. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this project, please contact me at (919) 733-
9584. Also, please note that the NCDENR StormwaterBest Management Practices Manual, April 1999, and other
documents and information can be downloaded from the Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/.
Sincerely,
1
Todd St. John, PE
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
cc: Asheville Regional Office
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Philip Ward AMERICAN soc"M OF LAM
Landscape Architect, P.A.
LAND PLANNING • SITE DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION MAN
CLARE CERTIFIED
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
FOR LANDSCAPE-ARCHITECTS
June 26, 2002
Mr. John Dorney
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 /Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1650
RE: "Regions Bank", DWQ Project No. WQ 01-1538
Highlands, North Carolina
Dear John:
fi JUN 2 8 20o2
As requested I have enclosed two copies of the drawings and Stormwater
Management Permit Application Form for the above referenced project. I have
included the drawings that relate to the stormwater management plan for the
proposed bank site.
Two bioretention areas will be constructed on the site to filter stormwater off
the proposed impervious areas of the site. Additionally, a 30' stream buffer will
be developed and landscaped along the existing stream channel below the
proposed culvert pipe.
Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
V V
Philip S. Ward Jr., ASLA
cc. Paul Schmitt - Architect
48 Links Drive -*P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717
Ph.-828-743-9951 • Fax-828-743-0687 • CeIM 506.8793 • E-Fw wardl @dnetnet
0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources :
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL ]INFORMATION
Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project): A as '0
'.2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and
its compliance):
Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
H
State:-??---
Z
Telephone Number:,
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letteis, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
J
5. Location of Facility (street address):
6. Directions to
tKn 51
7. Latitu
of facility
Z'>
$` Contact person who can answer questions about the facility:
No= Telephone Number. 1-7 J a '
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): _XL. New . Renewal odification
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list
the wadngpwnitrnin?ber and its issue date (if hwwn)

G
(from nearest major intersection): (JS HI
Form SWU-101 Apri1 1998 - Paoe 1 of 4
3. Specify the type of project (check one): ,
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
LAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404 Permit
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total Project Area• i acres . 4. Project Built Upon A
5. How many drainage basins does the project have? Q I?
6. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two drainage basins in
the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin provided in the same format as
below.
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above
IV.
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded.
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 2 of 4
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
" Impervious area is defined as the Wit upon rea including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking
areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this ?section:
IJeatedagentCa?dividualorfirm)•L??? I W ,
A AM
Ph. 7 "I 4 5? -- - 0!2y W- Fa)c

VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
This application package will not be accepted by the Divis}an of Water Quality unless all of the applicable
items are included with the submittal
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by signing your initials in the
space provided next to each item. A ant's Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP (see Attachment A)
• Permit application processing fee (see Attachment A)
• Two copies of plans and specifications including:
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including: -
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm - 7
'
-Legend
- North arrow
Scale `
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist '
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage basins delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. APPLICANTS CERTMCATION
C
I, (print or type name of person listed in General hOrIndion, item 2)
proj
certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct, tha the - 'ec will be
constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the deed restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A of this form will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed proje'es wi is of 15A NCAC 2H.1000.
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 3 of 4
ATTACHMENT A
1. Deed Restriction Language
The following statements must be recorded for all low density projects and for all projects that involve the
subdivision and selling of lots or outparcels:
1. No more than square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the
edge of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures including
asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but not including wood decking or
the surface of swimming pools. This covenant is intended to insure continued compliance with the
stormwater permit issued by the State of North Carolina, The covenant may not be changed or
deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No one may jM in, pipe, or alter any roadside Swale except as necessary to provide a minimum
driveway crossing.
NOTE: If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built upon area for each lot.
For commercial projects that have outparcels or future development the following statements must also be
recorded:
3. The connection from the outparcel or future area into the stormwater system must be made into the
forebay such that short-circuiting- of the system does not occur.
4. All built-upon area from the outparcel or future development must be directed into the permitted
stormwater control system.
5. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit modification prior to
construction.
For curb outlet systems, the following statement in addition to items 1 and 2 above must be recorded:
6. No one may pipe, fcll in or alter any designated 100 foot long grassed Swale used to meet the
requirements of NCAC 2H.1008(g)..
2. Supplement Foznns
The applicable supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project:
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SW U 103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104 Low Density Supplement
Form SWU-105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU 106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU 107 .. Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU 108 Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy Supplement
3. Permit Application Fees
Office)
Type of Permit
Low Density
,High Density
Dig's Certification
General Permit
(check made payable to NCDENR and.submitted• to the appropriate Regional
New, Modification, or
Late Renewal
$225
$385
$350
$50
Timely Renewal Without
Modification
n/a
$225
n/a
n/a
n/a
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 4 of 4
I I I
��Y OF �.
hilip Ward
PLandscape Wm.PaB2742. N,2V,7
Architect, P.A. ._,��, _ �.....�`''� „�

'156 lajh- ?btJK
aI6Hl,?Nph a?? MAC
i"-4zae'
SiCf MwQTr:T- MCv?I?G?M??
gl opt'fv<ial
sIZIN4
ouy
31,41 oZ
x
15,9$77
11215
2.207q Z'f I(o 1? 01
1 Z W 1-T1A
O, o5 X 1(0 -01 =
tl t7e,
00 ?Pf
0 644. Ay..?A :4 2
Sts AKA ', G'' ??G?'
IM VIOU1 I Zi OZO 4,7F 0,90 !o?$t8
l.Ql?SG??,'?o 4 0, Zri
1014 151011Cv Sf II Qbo7
??2E w?1? sib
0105 X, 1112)07= 590 (u? iooo sf)
A E;
17 Zo-zi Sf
414)-7isF
0 ,9o
p,215

?v10??1'?N'f?or.16??F? $YP?iI ?OV?'?LG•I
W145q fUeFf
?? rrY o f '??F ?lo?t??•rto?J ? . , t-r
W aJ??LoW t NTo A GLF i Nom'` AN?
VrO4 ?l F1 Ff??
a;
= O,90 ?z 6,09 0,51. = 37GF4i

?l D,OZA $ u
tlh? lay
?ia?7?t?fia? # z
ITS -
c?z?i sGl/?
C? vi = 09D x Px 0,?7 Ac, 2,7 Gam'
Z

?- i(o
3/,0
o?ozz
Il?lit uhf 14it

Ir.ic. x
..................
?- RSY
t .
1 to \ti
.. w?rrrs ...
r. .
.
•? . :`? Y V
r:
i/.
V
a • ` ?° '? •y
r/
"' ?-'? a .: l `;•' ? ? `?• a. [??,?''. ?'' ?' ?
..: M ,
}
??? I ©<R
wag
ri
5
J+'
.............
K? -
I?a
??toN`i g6NK
I ?
GDlMlM??Ib? - 24 AG,
R?irp?I?'(ibl. (RUR>? - 61 Y- , 0,30
-f i h? o cod N -T o
3
L3 ?i C! 2500
7
H -ISO
D27 17ZS
toy )Z)01
?}?t;seas+5 ara?i
All
8acl M1 1j ,
?-? -Ty f?f %0= 11-L
24 A o, Sr7= 204 5 I ?t a 1 o = I r2 75 " ©a 4$
-75

az? = 0.40 /. 5,`) )C 7e= 2ol G f'7
7 ??W Ukb??(- ? = I''? 4 ?_-Tu AFoG}I, GIAIIF
Q'F1RA415D Gt1LVf T1 444f 1tSc 1T(
H0"f;"/
4W = C.0O 5' 6?5
Q = 209 Lis f . ?? 5
r-? A 8,;V
cu?vl?f-t

= l 3" ?C 55 ?t'?G?F GM?,
IWO&
Exhibit 13
44 ! QH L5,000
16'-T'x10'-1' 4,000 4 (2)
15'-4'x 9'•3' 3.000 EXAMPLE 4 3)-
Sias: 3r: 224. 4.
12'-ItYx 6'-4' 2,000 0. 2oef• 3
a
Ss AV- '+I' ew -3.
D (fact) 3
a 11'•501 7'-3'
1000 (1) 1.10 2.0
W ' (2) 1.10 2J 2
600 (3) 1.22 L.2
z 600 e0 is )at 2 2
m a 500
N LW-2.' 5'-9' 400 •3
300 L5 1.6
5'-1'
00.
-7' - --+? ---?
LL 72' x 44" 100 1.0 1.0
Z 80 9 1.0
L6 - 65' x 40¦ .9
O 60
W 50 / K '9-
58' x 36q 40 u. .8 .8
a ,
x a / / rn .6
= 30
50'x 3 1'
W n 20 HW SCALE ENTRANCE ? •r-
H 43' x 27' C TYPE
(1) Msodrrall • d .6
(2) -Mitered to conform ° .6
to elope a .6
X36' Ic 22' (N
prejsetin?
6
c
0e 4 To ass scale (2) or (3) project m
29' x 16' 3 horizontally to wall (1), than
ass Oreight lacliaed line through
o and 0 steles, or reverse as
25' 1 16' 2 illustrated.
.4 .4 .4
22' x 13' 1.0 i e -??
I .35
18' x i l' .6 .35 .35
*ADDITIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
I LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG C. M. PIPE-ARCH CULVERTS
xuffau of PURL: SM03 rAK ltlea WITH INLET CONTROL
11 VI-13
WOMBLE
CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE
& RICE
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY
150 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 2100
Raleigh, NC 27601
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 831
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Web site: wwwwcsr.com
June 21, 2002
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality-Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Regions Bank Branch Permitting
Dear John:
Eric M. Braun
Direct Dial: [phone]
Direct Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
ROWE
4
.0 2 4W
r
I am enclosing copies of the pictures of the drainageway involved in the Regions Bank
permitting matter we discussed yesterday. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
information.
With best regards, I am
Sincerely yours,
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE
A Professional Limited Liability Company
6??_
Eric M. Braun
EMB/alt
Enclosures
RALEIGH41F4SI18GIA / NORTH CAROLINA / SOUTH CAROLINA / VIRGINIA / WASHINGTON D.C.
� - /�• C- ,` +�' . , � � lam: r � ' }�•�•i � �,,,.�,yti�rr*-� �
.� • � rY� r...y
1
a
.r • , ,
•
- - � •..• is �: .� .. � '

4 -4 op" m p P, PAP' 0 p -0 P.O.-m- -9

V?'•
Poo
J t I
tot
'A� � i. .fes'. l i Y .. ` ,i•�+. � �.�9F• 7' \� � •�•�� r"'
bAli
4k,
Ile,
'••r _ Y �'

r
1
rc r
trti ` A,i / a 4_
CIA .': ., ?? ??? /ffjr? e '?' ^,`' .?'• ? p?. -. Wrri!,
t- t? _ ` 1 {•; 'tea- .,•k ? :`?"??• ;: _ ? -- ??-:,, 97 ,?# ? R ? *ai.
a" '? -,:ate ?•?`'?j -> "? ?'i:
', [ r ~i i ??I? a.• r i « ` 717' S 1/4 4b:
F ?. r ;c'? 7''9?Y ?•
?.? .l.- 1 ?i. ?'?'?J ??`'?l?rY? e - ? t. ???ept Starr ?r•??
iA j,
T i i t? !}Dy1/e s X1 !a e ?.
•'? ?! ,i.d 'y;?-? i?2'j?ai ?.-r rs1S'? .fi a4 i.• T
? f ?1?•J?l! ' 1? r e '?i r
e r. r
• K. t+ . ?. S ? 1 ! ?. a -,-
t r 1( J?(,

?P! .1
?-: "_ ?,, t .fie. _ ? ? ? ..- ??.
? '
' ? \` /, `N?{lam ?,]J1]; r??4-? {1 + r ?.? t???° ?, \ !??
!'1f ? }` -[?I it ? ?. ?. ', ,?'??
'.` F
__ . _ _-?.!__ ? _ 3?
..,_;•_vim--� �� •,�,' �;.,��
� T • ,ems .' �:., ��', - `, t. .R
` #'w _ amu"` �• � p.. i . , � � �:i� a

Yvt
bo-+ Is
L)V

_? __5 _ not dlcl?w
e _ ' , n �"`
lD��a lMlb 1/nuc rP1�V`..4 lC�

(C
_fb
Q?s ?
3 ao, zany.
/?--
_-
?l9 ..733 -SD83 x 3CoG

WQC #3353
STREAM RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT AND STABILIZATION AND WETLAND AND
RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND CREATION ACTIVITIES CERTIFICATION
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR STREAM RESTORATION. ENHANCEMENT AND
STABILIZATION PROJECTS AND WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND
CREATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING THOSE ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 13 (BANK STABILIZATION) AND 27 (WETLAND AND
RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND CREATION) AND REGIONAL PERMIT 197800080
(CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BULKHEADS)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401, Public
Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and 15A NCAC 2B .0200 for the discharge of fill
material to waters as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (13) and (27) of the Corps of
Engineers regulations (i.e. Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27) and Regional Permit
197800080. The category of activities shall include stream bank stabilization or stream
restoration activity as long as impacts to waters or significant wetlands are minimized. This
Certification replaces Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 1663 issued on September 8,
1983; WQC No. 1272 issued November 10, 1978; WQC No. 2665 issued on 21 January 1992;
WQC No. 2102 issued on February 11, 1997, and WQC Nos. 3256, 3257 and 3258 issued on
November 22, 1999. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers reauthorize
Nationwide Permits 13 or 27 or Regional Permit 197800080 or when deemed appropriate by the
Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Wetland and/or riparian area restoration and creation projects (not including projects
that only involve stream restoration or enhancement work described in condition
nos. 2 and 3) that are proposed under this General Certification require written
application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality except as specified
below;
Wetland and riparian area restoration and creation projects (not including projects
that involve work in or impacts to streams) which are not for compensatory
mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit proposed under this General
Certification do not require written application to and approval from the Division of
Water Quality if they are projects undertaken by the N.C. Wetlands Restoration
Program, Clean Water Management Trust Fund, U.S. Natural Resources
Conservation Service or Section 319 projects. In these cases, the applicant is
required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of project specifications
before the impact occurs. If the Division determines that the project would not result
in an ecologically viable wetland and riparian area, then the Division shall notify the
applicant in writing within 30 days of receipt of the notification. In such cases, the
applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate
fee, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal
procedures;
2. Proposed stream restoration projects (as defined and limited below), that do not
disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit do not require written application to and approval
from the Division of Water Quality, and, therefore, do not require payment of an
application fee to the Division of Water Quality.
WQC #3353
Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered or
degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and floodprone areas to
its natural or referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed
conditions. This biological and chemical integrity, including transport of water and
sediment is produced by the stream's watershed in order to achieve dynamic
equilibrium. The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three
copies of detailed restoration plans and specifications before the impact occurs. If
the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream
restoration, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of
receipt of the application. In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a
formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to
process the application through normal procedures;
3. Stream enhancement projects (as defined and limited below), that do not disturb
wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit and do not include any stream channel relocation, do
not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality,
and, therefore, do not require payment of an application fee to the Division of Water
Quality.
Stream enhancement is the process of implementing stream rehabilitation practices
in order to improve water quality and/or ecological function. These practices must
only be conducted on streams that are not experiencing severe aggradation or
erosion. Stream enhancement does not include the relocation of the stream channel.
Stream enhancement bank stabilization techniques include the use of woody
vegetation as the primary means of long term stability, and "soft" techniques such
as root wads that encourage the establishment of dense woody vegetation. Stream
enhancement techniques do not typically include the use of stream bank or bed
hardening techniques such as rip-rap or other rock, gabion, block or concrete
structures. However, enhancement activities may also include the placement of in
stream habitat or grade control structures such as cross vanes, j-hook vanes, and
wing deflectors that do not affect the overall dimension, pattern, or profile of a stable
stream.
The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed
enhancement plans and specifications before the impact occurs if the stream
enhancement project disturbs greater than 500 feet of stream bank or if the project
proposes the use of in stream structures. If the Division determines that the project
does not meet the above definition of stream enhancement, then the Division shall
notify the applicant in writing with an explanation within 30 days of receipt of the
notification to require application and payment of the appropriate fee;
4. Stream stabilization projects that include the use of any structure or fill in the existing
stream bed or disturb greater that 500 feet of stream bank that are proposed under
this General Certification require written application to and approval from the
Division of Water Quality.
Stream stabilization is defined as the in-place stabilization of an eroding stream
bank using measures that consist primarily of "hard" engineering, such as but not
limited, to concrete lining, rip rap or other rock, and gabions. The use of "hard"
engineering will not be considered as stream restoration or enhancement;
WQC #3353
5. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins
(or any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in
effect at the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification
from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 26.0200. Activities listed as "exempt"
from these rules do not need to apply for written concurrence under this
Certification. New development activities located in the protected 50-foot wide
riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not) within the Neuse and Tar-
Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be located,
designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water
quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
6. In order for the above conditions to be valid, any plans not requiring written
concurrence to use this Certification must be built according to the plans provided to
the Division of Water Quality. If written concurrence is required, then the project
must be built and maintained according to the plans approved by the written
concurrence and Certification from the Division of Water Quality;
7. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment
Control Planning and Design Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual"
whichever is more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources at the
DENR Regional and Central Offices) shall be designed, installed and maintained
properly to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard
(50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs in DWQ-classified trout
waters);
8. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or
delegated program has released the project;
9. Any rip-rap shall be of such a size and density so as not to be able to be carried off
by wave or current action and consist of clean rock or masonry material free of
debris or toxic pollutants. Rip-rap shall not be installed in the streambed except in
specific areas required for velocity control and approved by the Division of Land
Resources and Water Quality. However rock vanes, wing deflectors, and similar
structures for grade control and bank protection are acceptable;
10. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
11. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding
of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
12. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects which require written
concurrence under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable
water quality and effluent standards;
13. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall
expire three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or the notification sent
to DWQ.
WQC #3353
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project shall
result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that requires
written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to have a
significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of the
wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: March 18, 2002
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
WQC # 3353
4
William G. Rost .ir., G,,,--rotary
II North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
U? f Alan Klimek, Dirac'.or
> y Division of 1Vater Qi-alily
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
3 June, 2002
C. Breck Patterson
Regions Bank
P.O. Box 2379
Highlands, North Carolina 28741
Regarding: Regions Bank
DWQ # 011538, Macon County
Dear Mr. Patterson,

The 401 Certification Unit was recently faxed, a copy of a letter dated April 30, 2002 that Mr. Richard
Betz from the Town of Highlands wrote to Milt Rhodes concerning compliance with the Water Supply 14
Watershed Protection Ordinance. Please be aware that this project has been put on administrative
hold until a variance request can be reviewed by the Environmental Management Commission.
Please call me if you have any questions (919/-1733-9646)..
Sincerely,
,ro n'Dorney
f
1 1
Cc: Mike Parker, Asheville Regional Office
Milt Rhodes, Local Government Assistance Program
Richard Betz, Town of Highlands
File copy
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
f?q
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Re. Town of Highlands
Subject: Re: Town of Highlands
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:47:38 -0400
From: Milt Rhodes <[e-mail]>
To: dave penrose <[e-mail]>
CC: "mike parker, aro" <[e-mail]>, John Domey <[e-mail]>
Thanks for checking in Dave. Here is an update on that project.
The project was incorrectly approved by the Town of Highlands. Their water
supply watershed ordinance is incorrect. Any time the 10/70 provision is
used, a 100 foot buffer is required. This project will require a major
variance as currently proposed. We (Steve and myself) are working on a
redesign to see if we can avoid encroaching into the buffer. Sit tight,
and I will make sure y'all are kept in the loop. The earliest we will be
able to move on a variance will be September.
Don't hesitate to call me if you have questions.
Milt
dave penrose wrote:
> Mike,
> We received a letter from the Town of Highlands dated 30 April
> requesting that we revoke the on-Hold letter for this project (01
> 1538). I've FAXed you a copy of the letter. Basically we will have to
> wait until the Water Supply Watershed Varience is approved by the EMC
> before we can issue the 401. John - if you need the file in my absence
> it's on my desk.
> Dave
I of 1 5/24/02 8:43 AM
A
04129/2002 07:29 7705336212
Ott' Fnimcial- Corp.
275 College Avenue, Gainesville, GA 30501
Forl
To., Cyndi Karoly
PAGE 01x'05

Co rp ora te Real Estate
Frain: David King
Fax: [phone] ftsem 4 + cover
Phone: [phone] Date.- 05-06.02
Re: City of Highlands letter to DVVQ Phones 770-533-5494
Fox: 770-533.5212
? Urgent El For Review ? Please Cormment ? Please Reply ? Please Recycle
• Commetfse
Cyndi,
Please see attached.
Thanks
David
04/2912002 07:29
Apr 30 02 02%24p
1-28-1995 2:12AM
7705336212
Maria Jennings
FROM
PAGE 02/05
828 526 4507 p.3
P. 2
TOWN OF HIGHLANDS
HICHLANJUS. N09TH CAROLINA
April 30, 2002
i
i
Division of water K1ual_ity
Looal Gover=ent Assistance unit
ATTN: 'Xil't RrlOdes
1637 Mail Service Center
Rajaisjh, NC 27699-3617
Dear m r. Rhodes
X am"writing to request more specific information
concerli1rg ovmpl iance of the Town of Highlands water
sapplyr Watershed Protection Ordinance Vith Division of
Water Quality ragulatisans, wbidh Larry Gan•ter.bain and I
discussed -Witth you this morning-
As- you may know, -the requirements of the watershed
Protection Act, as set forth in G. S, 5143-+214".5 and
the N. c. Administrative Code, were i,ncorpvra.ted into
the Towrs's ZoniAq Ordinance, affective October 1, i.i93,
and T_ was the Town PZannex at the time. The Ordixianc&
was based on the I1-0del Ordinance approved duly y, 19S21
was tb.a subject Of many work sessions and public
hearings, was legally adgpted by our Board of
Coimnissioners and approved by our Town Attorney at the
time, and was approved by the Enviro=ental Management
commission on 7uly 15, 1994, following a minor
technical amendment (see letter attached)-
This matter came to onr attentign by copy of a
letter provided to this office from Paul Schmitt, ALA,
aarahitect for the Regions Sank project approved by the
Town's Zoning Board of Adjustment several,month$ ago.
The letter from 3ohh Dorneyr to SX•eck PA-tterscn of
Regions Bank, dated April 18, referred to a regUirement
for a major_ variance bemuse of the 58% "built-upon"
for the proposed project, which you deemed a "high-
dansit-j" option, and also referred to a requ.i rq%ent for
a IQQ-foot natural vegetative buffer,.rather than the
30^-foat buffer required by Section 211-¢• of our
Ordinance. You also indicated that the earliest that a
i major variance request could be considered would be
Sep•tamber of 2002.
Although you mentioned that you had discussed
these issues with previous Zoning AdminisErators
Maureen Lackey anti Ghrwstoper Shook, I was unaware
until this morning that there was a problem with either
of these components of our Ordinance, which have been
in effect for nearly nine years.
f
I?
P.Q•?QX1t6D XXOHLAP'11]5.NORTH CARQ:INA2$'.ti (8281526,2[18 , [phone] FAX(828) 52&2595
04129/2002 07:29
Rl r 30 02 02.24p
1 -29- 1 99S 2:144M
7705336212
Maria Jennings
FREM
Pare Two
Letter tO Milt Rhodes
April 30, 2002
PAGE 03105
028 526 4007 p.4
If I understood ouz conversation 001-rectly, you
xnaintairlpd that the 30_ycaZled "special non-residential
intensity allocation (SNIA) *' in our Ordinance does not
comply wi.tb the Statute in cove manner. My own
recollect-ion, however, together with my reading of the
model ordinance on Which our Ordinance was based, is
that the SNIA iz a low-density option specifioally
} authorized by the Statute. I an enclosing tYS2
I applicable portions of the Model Ordinance_
Section 304 in the Model Ordinance, to Which you
also referred, is a requirement. for a 100-foot buffer
I "for M11 new development activities that exceed-the, caw
density ovrie .6° We have used the low-density option
In our Ordiha.33ce, which requires only a 30-foot ituffer.
In fact, the Town decided to adapt an Ordinance that
includes a so-foot buffer in the Critical Areas, in
recagnitior. of +our unique situation in Ifighlands and a
desire to protect and improve water qualaty.
I em not certain at this point what authority your
office has to "put this project on huld,0 the phrase
used in Mr. Dorneyx s letter. Our Zonir cl Board granted
a Special, Vse P4rmit on November 13, 2001, nearly six
mont45 ago,. conditioned on only three requirements:
presentation of a Construction Schedule to the Zoning
Administrator, presentation of a Landscape Schedule to
the Zoning Adhinistrator, and approval of the re-
directing of a Stream by the U. S. A=y Carps of
Engineers.
The Town' 5 position--in which Larry Gai',tenbei n,
1 our cu=en't Watershed Admi.nistxator, cores--iz that
no variance was reV ired.. Section 211.6(c) of our
Ordinance, approved nine years ago by your Division,
pex=its a maxizi= 70$ built-tipon for the subject
property, and authorizes the watershed. Aftinistrato: to
'make this approval; that approval was confirmed by our
Zoning Board, and nc vari.anoe, mincr or Zwjor, was
requested or recraired from the density :requi.rament.
Similarly, we take the positron that merely oulverting
a strea7e is not "devt lopment" requiring a variance from
l the natural vegetative buffer requiro-meat. This
interpretation is confirmed by a note xetai nQd in our
file relating to culverting st3reans:
i
I (cONTINUW )
04/29/2002 07:29 7705336212
Apr 30 02 02:25p Maria Jennings 928 52G 4607
1-28-1995 2,14aM FROM
Page Three
'Letter to Milt Rhod"
April. 30, 2002
"11 a stream is placers within a culvert of
adequate size, the buffer would no longer be
required (except in a radius at the and of
the =lVart) ; Lion--point-source pollution
tbeQrPti.aaIJy could not get intco a closed
culvert, Some soil erosa_tn considerations
might apply, depending on the size of the
stream. LISe Martin a:'id. Steve Zoufa.ly at tKc
tte both agreed with this interpretation as
of August 9, 1903, and we agree, with tbam. "
We feel that oQr Ordiraasice fully complies with G. S.
5143-214.5 and with the Adminis-trative Code 4t 15-14OAC-
2B .0100, .0200, and .0300. (1 am enclesirg a copy oZ
1 paragraph (V) of the Administrative Codey.
I shc:41a also point out thatImost of the Team 's
commercial area is iecated-within the VS-III-DW
Watershed Overlay District, in which both the 70!k
built.-upon is permitted as an SNIA and a 30-f0ot
natural vegetative buffer is strictlX eAforced. ShOUl.d
these elements of the Qrd!PaDce, which have bean
consistently enforced for nearly nine ears, be
replaced with a 34V built-upon limit and a 100-Moot
buffer, 1 &ry large portions cf the ToW'n WoUld be
affected in a signa.41caAt way.
Regions Sank is prepared to begin coxstructIon on
this project, as approved on November i3, 2001; in
fact, if they. rho not obt.a p a Zoning Cartifica-to by may
iz, zooz (Iswittliln six montbs from the date of the
d4*cxsion, ") the Special Use Permit will expire l>ndclr
Section 501.5 of our ordinance. 'While they have been
exceptionally cooperative thxougbout this process,
there is A real possibility that legal consequences
could ensue, for .both the Town and your Division, if
this project is unreasonably delayed.
Under these circuzstances, we would request the
fo'loving:
(1) That you immediately revoke your request to
the U. S. Army Corps of Pngineers that this profeot be
placed on bold; or, in the alternative,
PAGE 04/05
A.5
P. d

04/29/2002 07:29
Apr 3a 02 02.25p
i-2B-I 2 = 7 SAM
7705336212
Maria Jennings
FRGM
Page Folar
Lettew' to Milt Rhode-
April 30, 2002
828 526 4807
(2) That yon: immadia.tely reply tc„ this letter, in
writing, reyo)ci:ig your Division's approval of JULY 15,
1944, specifically explaining 'why our ordinance is
unlawful and citing the s'tat'utory authority.
yovr cooperation in resolving this matter as
qui.e3cly as possible is requested.
sincerely yours,
Richard et.z
ToWn Administratpr
lrpb
cc: Larry Gantenbein, Watersbed Administrator
Allen L. ' "Buck" Trott, Mayor
William Coward, Town Attorney
David Baker; U. S. Army Corps of Eng ixieer•s
Steve zoufaxy, Division of water Quality
John Dornay, DiviWzon of water quality
Pahl. 5chm'h tt, Architect
Philip Ward, Architeet
Breck Patterson, Regions Bank
PAGE 05/05
P.E
p. 5
O?OF W AT ?RQG
>
o ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 18, 2002
Macon County
DWQ Project No. 01-1538
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C. Breck Patterson
Regions Bank
P.O. Box 2379, Highlands, NC, 28741
Dear Mr. Patterson:
On April 8, 2002, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received revised information regarding your application for a
401 Water Quality Certification for the Regions Bank project in Macon County. On April 17, 2002, we were notified by Mr.
Milt Rhodes of the Division of Water QuafWs Local Government Assistance Unit that this project would require a Major
Variance to the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. The Variance must be issued by the NC Environmental
Management Commission. Specifically, the built-upon area is 58%. In the site's environmental evaluation, the impervious
area is identified to be 70% or 0.70 acres- The water supply regulations for this watershed only allow for up to 24%
impervious surface. A higher limit can bereached through the use of Stormwater controls with an approved high density
ordinance for the town, but the Town of Jij$ilands does not have such an ordinance. It appears that you are utilizing the
10/70 option in this case. If so, the project's reference to a 30-foot buffer is incorrect, and the actual watershed buffer
should be 100 feet. In addition, it appearsthat a large amount of stream and associated buffer will be piped and filled to
provide for impervious area. This proposed work necesitates a major variance in the WS-III watershed rules.
Please contact Mr. Milt Rhodes in the Local Government Assistance Unit at [phone], ext. 366 regarding this
matter. Mr. Rhodes can explain the variance process to you and discuss scheduling of your variance request. If the
variance is not granted, we cannot issueitle 401 Water Quality Certification. If the variance is approved, we cannot issue
the 401 Certification until we receive a copy of the variance.
Until this issue is resolved, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold.
Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)). Please
be aware that this action supplements theletter sent to you by the Asheville Regional Office on December 10, 2001. All
issues in both letters will need to be addressed.
Thank you for your attention. If you (lave any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in Raleigh at
[phone].
Sincerely,
h Dorney
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville RegulaWy Field Office
Mike Parker, Asheville DWQ RegiorelOffice
File Copy
Central Files
Philip Ward, 48 Links Drive, Cashiers NC, 28717
Mickey Henson, P.O. Box 52, WebsLar, NC, 28788
Milt Rhodes, Planning
Steve Zoufa y, anning
North Carolina Division of WaterGuality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Ralekk NC 27699-1650 (Flailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh. 27604-2260 (Location)
Q10-733-1789 (nhnnol Q1Q-7-4L;=1 lfwl hft- h9n gyn. ?t?+-

I TOWN OF HIGHLANDS
J" HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA
April 30, 2002
Division of Water Quality
Local Government Assistance Unit
ATTN: Milt Rhodes
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Rhodes:
_16-3t

I am writing to request more specific information
concerning compliance of the Town of Highlands Water
Supply Watershed P -fection Ordinance with Division of
a er Qua a io s, w is arry Gantenbein and
discussed with you this morning.
?f
As-you may know, the requirements of the Watershed ff V/1
Protection•Act, as set forth in G. S. §143-214.5 and Sj 7
the N. C. Administrative Code, were incorporated into pV?O
the Town's Zoning Ordinance, effective October 1, 1993, 1? V
and I was the Town Planner at the time. The Ordinance i
was based on the Model Ordinance approved July 9, 1992,
was the subject of many work sessions and public i
hearings, was legally adopted by our Board of y
Commissioners and approved by our Town Attorney at the1 uICS
time, and was approved by the Environmental Management
Commission on July 15, 1994, following a minor T`f
technical amendment (see letter attached). IV- Y*
This matter came to our attention by copy of a ???? /
letter provided to this office from Paul Schmitt, AIA, V
architect for the Regions Bank project approved by they
Town's Zoning Board of Adjustment several months ago.
The letter from John Dorney to Breck Patterson of Regions Bank, dated April 18, referred to a requirement
for a major variance because o e % "built-upon" for the proposed project, whic you eemed a "
dense " o tion, and also rem o a requiremen-t for
a 100-foot natural vegetative buf er, rather than the
-foot buffer require by Sect ion 211.4 of our
r finance. ou a so in ica e a the he that a
mayor variance request could be considered would be Pier
September of 2002.
Although you mentioned that you had discussed
these issues with previous Zoning Administrators
Maureen Lackey and Christoper Shook, I was unaware
until this morning that there was a problem with either
of these components of our Ordinance, which have been
in effect for nearly nine years.
(CONTINUED)
P.O. BOX 460 HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA 28741 [phone] [phone] FAX [phone]
Printed an Recycled Paper
Page Two
Letter to Milt Rhodes
April 30, 2002
If I understood our conversation correctly, you
maintained that the so-called "special non-residential
intensity allocation (SNIA)" in our Ordinance does not
comply with the Statute in some manner. My own
recollection, however, together with my reading of the
Model Ordinance on which our Ordinance was based, is
that the SNIA is a low-density option specifically
authorized by the Statute. I am enclosing the
applicable portions of the Model Ordinance.
Section 304 in the Model Ordinance, to which you
also referred, is a requirement for a 100-foot buffer
"for all new development activities that exceed the low
density option." We have used the low-density option
in our Ordinance, which requires only a 30-foot buffer.
In fact, the Town decided to adopt an Ordinance that
includes a 50-foot buffer in the Critical Areas, in
recognition of our unique situation in Highlands and a
desire to protect and improve water quality.
I am not certain at this point what authority your
office has to "put this project on hold," the phrase
used in Mr. Dorney s e er. Our Zoning Board granted
a Special Use Permit on November 13, 2001, nearly six
months ago, conditioned on only three requirements:
presentation of a Construction Schedule to the Zoning
Administrator, presentation of a Landscape Schedule to
the Zoning Administrator, and approval of the re-
directing of a stream by the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
The Town's position--in which Larry Gantenbein,
our current Watershed Administrator, concurs--is that
no variance was required. Section 211.6(c) of our
Ordinance, approved nine years ago by your Division,
permits a maximum 70% built-upon for the subject
property, and authorizes the Watershed Administrator to
make this approval; that approval was confirmed by our
Zoning Board, and no variance, minor or major, was
requested or required from the density requirement.
Similarly, we take the position that merely culverting
a stream is not "development" requiring a variance from
the natural vegetative buffer requirement. This
interpretation is confirmed by a note retained in our
file relating to culverting streams:
(CONTINUED)

Page Three
Letter to Milt Rhodes
April 30, 2002
"If a stream is placed within a culvert of
adequate size, the buffer would no longer be
required (except in a radius at the end of
the culvert); non-point-source pollution
theoretically could not get into a closed
culvert. Some soil erosion considerations
might apply, depending on the size of the
stream. Lisa Martin and Steve Zoufaly at EMC
the both agreed with this interpretation as
of August 9, 1993, and we agree with them."
We feel that our Ordinance fully complies with G. S.
§143-214.5 and with the Administrative Code at 15-NCAC-
2B .0100, .0200, and .0300. (I am enclosing a copy of
paragraph (V) of the Administrative Code).
I should also point out that most of the Town's
commercial area is located within the WS-III-BW
Watershed Overlay District, in which both the 70%
built-upon is permitted as an SNIA and a 30-foot
natural vegetative buffer is strictly enforced. Should
these elements of the Ordinance, which have been
consistently enforced for nearly nine years, be
replaced with a 24% built-upon limit and a 100-foot
buffer; very large portions of the Town would be
affected in a significant way.
Regions Bank is prepared to begin construction on
this project, as approved on November 13, 2001; in
fact, if they do not obtain a Zoning Certificate by May
13, 2002 ("within six months from the date of the
decision,") the Special Use Permit will expire under
Section 501.6 of our Ordinance. While they have been
exceptionally cooperative throughout this process,
there is a real possibility that legal-consequences
could ensue, for both the Town and your Division, if
this project is unreasonably delayed.
Under these circumstances, we would request the
following:
(1) That you immediately revoke your request to
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers that this project be
placed on hold; or, in the alternative,
(CONTINUED)
Page Four
Letter to Milt Rhodes
April 30, 2002
(2) That you immediately reply to this letter, in
writing, revoking your Division's approval of July 15,
1994, specifically explaining why our ordinance is
unlawful and citing the Statutory authority.
Your cooperation in resolving this matter as
quickly as possible is requested.
Sincerely yours,
Town Administrator
/rpb
cc: Larry Gantenbein, Watershed Administrator
Allen L. "Buck" Trott, Mayor
William Coward, Town Attorney
David Baker, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Steve Zoufaly, Division of Water Quality
John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Paul Schmitt, Architect
Philip Ward, Architect
Breck Patterson, Regions Bank

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, COMMISSION
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
July 15, 1994
Bobby Zoellner
Town Administrator
Town of Highlands
P.O. Box 460
Highlands, NC 28741-0460
Dear Mr. Zoellner,
David H. Moreau
Chairman
Charles H. Peterson
Vice Chairman
Edwin E. Andrews, III
Charles L Baker
Michael K. Barnes
Daniel V. Besse
Carla E. DuPuy
Donald Ensiey, MPh, Ph.D
Robert Epting
William S. Farabow, MD
Will B. Fowler
Alice Garland
James Kirk Glenn, Jr.
Michel A. Ibrahim, MD, Ph.D
Dennis C. Loflin
Richard V. Watkins, PE
Lawrence R. Zucchino
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the amended water supply watershed protection
ordinance submitted by the Town in compliance with the Water Supply Watershed Protection Act (NCGS
143-214.5) has been approved. Please be advised that any subsequent amendments to your ordinance
must meet or exceed the minimum statewide standards and must be submitted to the EMC for approval.
The EMC and the Division of Envi?onmentai Management (DEM) are extremely pleased with the effort your
municipality and the other affected local governments have demonstrated throughout this process.
. If you have any questions regarding the Water Supply Watershed Protection Program or neeri
assistance with interpretation of any of the statewide requirements, please do not hesitate to contact Lisa
Martin or Steve Zoufaly in the Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental Management at (949)
733-5083.
Your interest and cooperation in protecting one of our state's most vital resources, water supply
watersheds, is greatly appreciated.
Zirely,
ov-Bavid H. Moreau.. ,.
cc: Forrest Westall, ARO DEM
Alan Lang, ARO DCA
Lisa Martin
Steve Zoufaly
Richard Betz, Town Planner/Zoning Administrator
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION
MODEL ORDINANCE
APPROVED
JULY 9, 1992

The structure of the ordinance, including the arrangement of articles and sections and
the working of titles, is provided as a suggestion and may be varied by local governments. The
ordinance is divided into articles and sections as outlined in the Table of Contents. In the
ordinance, each article represents a fundamental part of the ordinance. Each section is a
discreet part of the article. Sections are further divided into subsections which do not appear
in the Table of Contents.
Two parts of the ordinance should be carefully reviewed by local governments. The
first is the definitions of words and terms used in the ordinance as provided in Article 600. This
is a critical part of the model ordinance and should be carefully reviewed before a local program
is adopted. The second is Article 300, Development Regulations. This includes seven separate
types of watershed areas needing some level of protection as specified by the EMC. It is highly
unlikely that any community will have to deal with all seven watershed areas. Each local
government should review the classifications assigned to the watersheds in their jurisdiction to
determine which of the seven watershed areas they must address.
The commentary is provided in an attempt to assist local governments in the preparation
of local ordinances and is an integral part of the model. As stated earlier, the watershed rule
allows a substantial amount of flexibility some of which is reflected in the commentary. The
commentary also provides explanatory and cautionary statements necessary for sound local
government implementation.
Appendices have been added containing items which may be of assistance to local
governments. Included are: 1) subdivision and development application forms, 2) sample rules
of procedure for the Watershed Review Board, 3) an example of a wet detention inspection
report, and 4) an example of how a local government could adopt the high density development
option provided in the rule.
Throughout the ordinance, items specific to cities and counties are typed in brackets
leg. [countyl[cityl). Other items for which there is a choice are also typed in brackets.
Parentheses are used to enclose explanatory words, phrases and statements. Words and
phrases that are italicized warrant special attention.
CAVEATS \
No local government should adopt this ordinance. word for word.. There are options
included in the text which must be considered by each governing board prior to the development
of a local program. The provisions of the model ordinance were written to conform to the rule
adopted by the EMC on February,13, 1992.
. he model ordinance never takes into account the existence of special, local legislation
that will impact the watershed program' in some jurisdictions. Local governments should
research and review any local legislation affecting their jurisdiction and determine how, if at all,
this model should be modified to meet their needs.
Y +C;
ORDINANCE
.e of Watershed)
:al Area)
:e of Watershed)
:al Area)
•ted Area)
COMMENTARY
Statutory authority for this section is derived from N.C.
General Statutes Chapter [153A][160A], Article [6][8],
Section [121][174], Section [140][193] and Chapter 143-
214-5- Alternate statutory authority for this article may
be derived from N.C: General Statute 153A-340 through 153A-
390, and 160A-381 through 160A-394.
This article contains development regulations
the watershed classifications. Watersheds designatedcWS?v
require no local government regulatory program. Local
governments will only need to include those regulations
corresponding to the classifications assigned to watersheds
in their jurisdiction. For WS-II, WS-III and WS-IV
watershed areas, the EMC rules provide for single family
residential development to be controlled either by limiting
built-upon area or by limiting density (dwelling units per
acre). Those involved in drafting the model ordinance felt
that most local units of government would find it easier to
enforce single family residential requirements thr
density controls rather than limiting built-upon area. All
other residential and non-residential
controlled by regulating the amount of built-uPon area are is
required by the EMC rules. a as
';Under the low density, option. usedin this ordinance,
governments with,a;WS-II,and/or a WS-III watershed area as
defined on Jul local
Y 1;-1993 are allowed to establish a
procedure by. which five percent of the balance of watershed
(area outside the, critical area) can be developed
residentially up
residentially up to 70 percent built-upon without non-
requiring
allow 70o The EMC may grant an exemption to
built-upon area on greater than 5% but not to
exceed 10% of each local government portion of the
designated watershed outside the critical area for new non-
residential development. 'How this five" percent will be
13

DEL ORDINANCE COMMENTARY
Uallocated, over time, among,._?the_,local.. governments:,; with
jurisdiction in the balance. of watershed will be up to each
local government.- For example, the local government may
choose to plan non-residential growth by identifying one or
more areas of its jurisdiction that would be suited for an
industrial park. Even though the rule states that this
additional new non-residential development may be up to 70
percent built-upon, other new non-residential development
may occur throughout the watershed in conformance with the
built-upon area requirements. Another method by which a
local government may choose to use to allocate its share of
density credits is on a project by project basis throughout
the balance of the watershed. This may occur either on a
first-come-first-served basis or projects may be required
to compete for the credits. If projects are required to
compete for credits, the ordinance must specify specific
rules and criteria that would apply to all projects
competing for the credits. A project by project method may
not, however, provide enough incentive for development of
the type of non-residential projects the local government
desires. Regardless of the method of allocation chosen,
each local government must keep careful records of the
total amount of land that is eligible for increased density
credits and the total.number of acres of built-upon surface
already developed.
The rules allow each local government to choose either a
low density or high density, option _f or, residential and'non-
residential development in WS-II, WS-III., and WS-IV
watershed areas. The text of the model ordinance only
includes the low density option. Appendix D contains a
suggested high density option text. Under the high density
option, all new residential development must be controlled
by limitations on built-upon area rather than dwelling
units per acre. Under the low density option, local
14
ORDINANCE
15
COMMENTARY
governments with a` Ws-II or ws-III watershed area are
allowed to establish a procedure whereby five percent of
the watershed not' located within a critical area can be
developed` non-residentially up to 70 percent. built -upon
without requiring stormwater control. In contrast, under
the high density option any new development exceeding the
low density requirements must utilize stormwater control,
including the 5% of the watershed that can be developed
non-residentially up to 70% built-upon. Local watershed
protection ordinances using the high density option must
require all new development projects which exceed the low
density option limits to utilize engineered stormwater
devices (wet detention ponds) designed to control the first
inch of rainfall. The rules also state that local
governments will 1) assume ultimate responsibility for the
operation and maintenance of all stormwater devices, 2)
perform annual inspections of each device, and 3) keep
standardized records on each stormwater device in their
jurisdiction. Local governments will also have to require
the "posting of adequate financial assurance, in the form
of a cash deposit with or a bond made payable to the local
government, or other acceptable security." This is to
assure maintenance, repairs and reconstruction, when
necessary. (Refer to sections .0104(f) and (g) and
.0211(d), (e) and (f) of the adopted rule for more complete
information.)
All requirements contained in Article 300 implement the
minimum standards adopted by the EMC. Local governments,
therefore, cannot relax these regulations but may adopt
more stringent ones if desired.
MODEL ORDINANCE COMMENTARY
(d) Non-residential development, excluding: 1)
the storage of toxic and hazardous materials
unless a spill containment plan is implemented,
2) landfills, and 3) sites for land application
of sludge/residuals or petroleum contaminated
soils. New industrial development is required to
incorporate adequately designed, constructed and
maintained spill containment structures if
hazardous materials are either used, stored or
manufactured on the premises.
(2) Density and Built-upon Limits:
(a) Single Family Residential--development shall
not exceed one dwelling unit per acre on a
project by project basis. No residential lot
shall be less than one acre, except within an
approved cluster development.
(b) All Other Residential and Non-Residential--
development shall not exceed twelve percent (12%)
built-upon area on a project by project basis.
For the purpose of calculating built-upon area,
the total project area shall include total
acreage in the tract on which the project is to
be developed.
(E) WS-III Watershed Areas - Balance of Watershed
(WS-III-BW). In order to maintain a low to moderate land
use intensity pattern, single family detached uses shall
develop at a maximum of two (2) dwelling units per acre.
All other residential and non-residential development shall
be allowed a maximum of twenty-four percent (24%) built-
upon area. In addition, non-residential itses may occupy
five percent `(5%) of the watershed with alseventy percent
22
MODEL ORDINANCE COMMENTARY
built-upon , area when approved: : as a special
'(SNIAThe Watershed
istrator is authorized to approve SNIAs consistent
_the;-provisions of this ordinance. Projects must
rill
ize'built=upon n surface area,.`,diieci stormwater away
from „'surface waters and incorporate, Best 'Management
Practices"'° to `"minimize water quality impacts. Non-
discharging landfills and sludge application sites are
allowed.
(High density options using engineered stormwater control
devices are permitted in this district: Ultimate
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of these
facilities will rest with the local government. Please
refer to Appendix D for a more detailed explanation of this
topic.)
(1) Allowed Uses
(a) Agriculture, subject to the provisions of
the Food Security .Act of 1985 and the Food,
Agricultural, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990.
(b) Silviculture, subject to the provisions of
the Forest Practices Guidelines Related to Water
Quality (15 NCAC 1I.61017.0209).
(c) Residential development.
(d) Non-residential development excluding
discharging landfills and the storage of toxic
and hazardous materials unless a spill
containment plan is implemented.
(2) Density and Built-upon Limits:
23
MODEL ORDINANCE
(a) Single Family Residential--development shall
not exceed two (2) dwelling units per acre, as.
defined on a project by project basis. No
residential lot shall be less than one-half (2)
acre, except within an approved cluster
development.
(b) All Other Residential and Non-Residential--
development shall not exceed twenty-four percent
(240) built-upon area on a project by project
basis except that,,up;_.to five` percent (50) of the
balance of the watershed may be developed for
non-residential uses to' seventy percent (70%)
built-upon'° area- on."a project by project basis.
For the purpose of calculating built-upon area,
total project area shall include total acreage in
the tract on which the project is to be
developed.
(F) WS-IV Watershed Areas - Critical Area (WS-IV-CA)..
Only new development activities that require an
erosion/ sedimentation control plan under State law or
approved local program are required to meet the provisions
of this ordinance when located in the WS-IV watershed. In
order to address a moderate to high land use intensity
pattern, single family residential uses are allowed at a.
maximum of two (2) dwelling units per acre. All other
residential and non-residential development shall be
allowed twenty-four percent (24%) built-upon area. New
sludge application sites and landfills are specifically
prohibited.
(High density options using engineered stormwater control
devices are permitted in this district. Ultimate
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of these
24
COMMENTARY
•vL.
MODEL ORDINANCE
Section 303. Cluster Development.
clustering of development is allowed in all Watershed
Areas.(except WS-I] under the following conditions:
(A) Minimum lot sizes are not applicable to single
family cluster development projects; however, the total
number of lots shall not exceed the number of lots allowed
for single family detached developments in Section 302.
Built-upon area or stormwater control requirements of the
project shall not exceed that allowed for the critical area
or balance of watershed, whichever applies.
(B) All built-upon area shall be designed and located
to minimize stormwater runoff impact to the receiving
waters and minimize concentrated stormwater flow.
(c) The remainder of the tract shall remain in a
vegetated or natural state. Where the development has an
incorporated property owners association, the title of the
open space area shall be conveyed to the association for
management. Where a property association is not
incorporated, a maintenance agreement shall be filed with
the property deeds:
Section 304. Buffer Areas Required. .
(A) A` minimum one :hundred (100) foot vegetative
buffer is required for all new development activities that
exceed the low_density_optioq; otherwise, a minimum thirty
(30j foot vegetative buffer for development activities is
required along all perennial waters indicated on the most
recent versions of U.S.G.S. 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) scale
topographic maps or as determined by local government
COMMENTARY
28

MODEL ORDINANCE
studies. Desirable artificial streambank or shoreline
stabilization is permitted.
(B) No new development is allowed in the buffer
except for water dependent structures and public projects
such as road crossings and greenways where no practical
alternative exists. These activities should minimize
built-upon surface area, direct runoff away from the
surface waters and maximize the utilization of stormwater
Best Management Practices.
Section 305. Rules Governing the Interpretation of
Watershed Area Boundaries.
Where uncertainty exists as to the boundaries of the
watershed areas, as shown on the Watershed Map, the
following rules shall apply:
(A) Where area boundaries are indicated as
approximately following either street, alley, railroad or
highway lines or centerlines thereof, such lines shall be
construed to be said boundaries.
(a) Where area boundaries are indicated as
approximately following lot lines, such lot lines shall be
construed to be said boundaries. However, a surveyed plat
prepared by a registered land surveyor may be submitted to
the [county][town] as evidence that one or more properties
along these boundaries do not lie within the watershed
area.
(C) Where the watershed area boundaries lie at a
scaled distance more than twenty-five (25) feet from any
parallel lot line, the location of watershed area
29
COMME
The EMC adopted this
locating built-upon
environmentally sensiti-

control requirements;
$n#4t-spevi-areas-may- en#Y-eeenr-#vi-ap#nrd-areas-ef-prejects-that-are-net
#mmed#ete#7-adjaeevit-te-water-snpp#Y-watersy Built-upon areas a
designed and sited to minimize stormwater runoff impact to the receiving
waters and minimizes concentrated stormwater flow;
Remainder of tract to remain in vegetated or natural state;
view- deve#epmevit-exceeds- #-dwe###vig-nn#t-per- sere- er-AQ4-ices##t-npeni-area-then,
deve#epinevit-tnnst-eevitre#-r,ztfeff-fsem-the-f#rst-#vieh-ef-ra#vifa337-new
deve3epmevit-rat-te-exceed-3Ai-bpi#t-,lpevi-aree7 (V) A maximum of -10A a of each jurisdiction's portion of the watershed outside of
the critical area may be developed with new non-residential development
projects of up to 703 built-upon surface area in addition to the new
nonresidential development approved in compliance with the appropriate
requirements of (e) (3) (B) (i) (I) or (e) (3) (B) (i) (II) of this Paragraah The
Commission may grant an exemption to allow 703 built upon area on greater than
5% but not to exceed 103 of each iurisdiction's portion of the designs ed
watershed outside of the critical area for new non-residential development in
unique or special circumstances. Each project must to the extent practicable
minimize built-upon surface area, direct stormwater runoff away from surface
waters and incorporate best management practices to minimize water quality
impacts; if the local government opts for high density development then
appropriate engineered stormwater controls (wet detention basins) must be
employed for the new non-residential development which exceeds the low density
requirements;
(V I) If local governments choose te-a#3ew-deve#epmer,t-regt?#r#vig the high density
development option which requires engineered stormwater controls, then they
will assume ultimate responsibility for operation and maintenance of the
required controls as outlined in Rule .0104(f) of this Subchapter;
(VII) Minimum 100 foot vegetative buffer is required for all new development
activities that exceed the low density requirements as specified in
(e)(3)(B)(i)(I) or (e) (3) (B) (ii) (11) of this Paragraph otherwise a minimum 30
foot vegetative buffer for development is required along all perennial waters
indicated ns-a-se#id-h#t?e-#ivie on the most recent versions of U.S.G.S.
1:24,000 (7.5 minute) scale topographic maps or as determined by local
government studies; the-f#ret-s?3-feet;-as-a-stivi#mnm;-#s-reeemmevided-te-rema3a
#r-a-viatnta?-viz-tividistt;rbed-state- heweve-r nothing in this Section shall stand
as a bar to desirable artificial streambank shoreline stabilization;
(VIII) No new development is allowed in the buffer; water dependent structures, and
public projects such as road crossings and greenways may be allowed where no
practicable alternative exists; these activities should minimize built-upon
surface area, divert runoff away from surface waters and maximize the
utilization of BMPs;
(IX) Maintain inventory of all hazardous materials used and stored in the watershed;
spill/failure containment plan and appropriate safeguards against contamination
are required; waste minimization and appropriate recycling of materials is
encouraged;
(X) No new discharging landfills are allowed;
(ii) Critical Area Nonpoint Source and Stormwater Pollution Control Criteria:
(I) No-npew industrial development is a#3ewedj required to incorporate adequately
designed constructed and maintained spill containment structures hazardous
materials are either used, stored or manufactured on the Premises:
(II) Low Density Option: New development limited to 1 dwelling unit per Q acres or
63 IZ_% built-upon area;
(III) High Density Option: If new development density exceeds either 1 dwelling unit
per -2 acres or 6$ = built-upon area then deve-3epment-must engineered
15
CF WATF,QQ C
o? L7
O 't
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
C. break Patterson
Regions Bank
P.O. Box 2379. Highlands, NO. 25741
GO emm
WNt W Q Hots. Jr., Seemory
oeovm r s d e"ka rim and Nawad Resawcos
Gv*9 ry J. ThMW. PK0b AC*1G 0W#V1br
Division of W*ter Quaiiry
April 18. 2002
Macon County
OWCI Project No. 01-1538
Post it• FU Note 7671 Dam " s?
To aj F" m ag jeAoog
COJOSM Co.
In PHpK / JJ r '7a ]Oa?lo??
?J
Fin i g4 S hW7 F#= 0
Dear Mr. Patterson:
she NO Otvision of Water Qualty PWQ) received revised information regarding your application for a
On April 8.20M in Macon County. On April 17, 2002, we were notified by Mr.
401 Water Quality Cerblication for the Regions Bank project would regWM a Major...
Milt Rhodes of the t)ivision of Water quality's Local GcvemmeM Assistance Unit that this proms Environmental
Variance to the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. The Variance must be issued by impervious
Management Commission. Specifically, the built-upon area is 58%. In the site's environmental evaluation, the
area is identified to be 70% or 0.70 acres. The water supply regulations for this watershed only allow for up to 24%
impervious surface. A ht?ter ifmit can be reached through the use of Stomswater controls with approved high density
th that you are
utiliz ordinance for the town, but the Town o Highlands does not have o such an
is incorrect, unit Me dual watershed buffer
that a large amount of stream and associated buffer welt be piped and filled to
should 10170 be option 100 this feet- - In case. if so, addition, it the projec appears t's reference
'
necessitates a major variance in the WS-Ill watershed rules-
provide for impervious area. This proposed work
Please contact W. Mist Rhodes in the Local Government Assistance Unit at (919) 733-5=3 exL 66? ffinngethis
matter. Mr. Rhodes can explain the variance process to you and discuss scheduling of your
variance is not granted. we cannot Issue the 401 Water Quality Certification. If the variance is approved, we cannot issue
the 401 Certification until we receive a copy of the variance.
of this Letter) that the Corps of Engineers place this project on hold.
on will
hold for for out (try copy processing due to incomplete information (15A NCAC 2H .0507(h)). Please
placed ed. I
Also, this Until prothisject issue will is be resolved.
Office on December 10. 2001. AN
be aware "this action supplements the letter sent to you by the Asheville Regional
issues in both letters will need to be address
Thank you for your attention. It you have any questions, please contact Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in Raleigh at
(WS) 733-1786. e+Qly?,,?
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mike .Parker, Asheville OWQ Regional Office
Fee COPY
Central Film
Philip Wend, 48 Inks•Drlve, Cashlers. NC. 28717
Miciwv Henson. P.O. Box 52. Webster, NC, 28788
"W r
Mut Rhodes. Planning
Steve Z
NoA? Cortina Dnvisslon of water CuMity. sot woeands Car6tication unit.
I WO Mid Sef,** Canter, SWe4r?. NC 2709.1650 l"" MOM)
2321 CrOb" Sh#&. paftq . NC 27804-9W M "*M)
x.7 1-178f3 (pNOne). 919-733 1%* s"r ssaa. rx wlr aweLaR+ds(
Regions Bank, Macon Co., 01-1538
Subject: Regions Bank, Macon Co., 01-1538
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:47:27 -0400
From: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
To: Milt.RhodesCncmail.net, JOhn.DorneyCa)ncmaiI.net, [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail]
John, Milt, Forrest, Mike - just an fyi to all of you so we all know the status of this application.
This is ARO.Mike Parker's filemaker staff report on this project:
Project has been placed on hold (by ARO) and letter has been sent to CO.
1. It was placed on hold because there is no mitigation plan.
2. Stormwater ponds are shown on the preliminary plan but does not appear to be in
. accordance with our requirements.
3. Project is within WS-III watershed and this may prevent project from being constructed.
Consultant is looking at redesigning project to relocate stream on property and to see if they can comply
with stormwater requirements and buffer requirements.
This is Milt Rhodes' note to us on this project:
011538 - This project will need a major variance from our water supply rules.
The built upon area is 58%. In the site's environmental evalaution, the
impervious area is identified to be 70% or 0.70 acres. The watershed only
allows for up to 24%. A higher limit can be reached through the use of
Stormwater controls with an approved high density ordinance for the town, but
the Town Af Highlands doesn't have one. It appears that they are utilizing the
10/70 option in this case. If so, the project's reference to a 30 foot buffer
is incorrect, and the actual watershed buffer should be 100 feet. In addition,
it appears that a large amount of stream buffer will be piped and filled to
provide for impervious area. This necessitates a major variance. Please return
this application to the applicant and request that they contact the Local
Government Assistance Unit regarding this matter.
Cul-rent Status: On March 22 and April 8, 2002, the Central Office received responses to the ARO hold
letter. This info was forwarded to Mike Parker on 4/11/02. The clock is now ticking, but we have plenty
of time right now. I have talked to Milt Rhodes today, and he says a variance is unlikely for this project.
We will get a letter prepared to send to the applicant from the Central Office reflecting Milt Rhodes'
comments.
If you have any additional info, please advise. Thanks for your attention.
1 of 1 4/17/02 11:48 AM

10-70f
Boa ,
-CK
[Fwd: April 401s]
Subject: [Fwd: April 401s]
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:43:26 -0400
From: Milt Rhodes <[e-mail]>
To: cyndi.karolyC)ncmail.net
Subject: April 401s
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:45:24 -0400
From: Milt Rhodes <[e-mail]>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
020383 - Berewyck
020382 - Rock Island Road
No commments. Generally, though it appears that there are numerous stream
crossings that could've been avoided through the combination of cart and road
crossings.
020481 - Road is wider than is otherwise necessary. Road also appears to be
more of a street than an avenue. An avenue would have a center median where
vegetation would exist.
020527 - The road is not defined as a rural or urban arterial and is expected
to have low traffic volumes. The road appears to be designed to support a
higher traffic volume than is necessary, and perhaps the road section should
have a narrow shoulder and narrow travel way (9 foot). Reducing impervious
surfaces associated with transportation networks can reduce the generation and
concentration of stormwater runoff, and in turn should reduce potential
negative impacts to the area.
020420 - It is unclear as to what project the applicant proposes. One
schematic and plan shows a irrigation intake structure. A secondary plan shows
stream bank stabilization for what appears to be a launch area and bulkhead.
Stream bank stabilization is allowable for water supply watersheds, provided
built upon area is water dependent, stormwater runoff is not discharged
directly into the surface water feature, and material used within the buffer
area is pervious.
No Number - John H. Brown, 740 Lock Highlands Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606
This application is for a subdivision referred to as the "Powell Property" and
indicates one stream crossing downstream of a pond. The Crossing will allow
the road to serve four housing units. There is no addition road connection
indicated, however, there is a private road with cul-de-sac on the outside of
the property in close proximity. The road is designed for two ten foot travel
lanes, the same distance utilized in many higher traffic volume areas. The
road could conceivably reduce environmental impacts by be reduced in size to a
private "yield" street type which would utilize a smaller right of way, travel
way, and minimize impacts to stream. If that options were not available, then
the applicant should consider utilizing more of the private road in existence
and run the public road on top of and adjacent to the dam at the pond, or
consider gaining easements from the Fairview property of road construction to
access those four lots.
011538 - This project will need a major variance from our water supply rules.
The built upon area is 58%. In the site's environmental evalaution, the
impervious area is identified to be 70% or 0.70 acres. The watershed only
allows for up to 24%. A higher limit can be reached through the use of
Stormwater controls with an approved high density ordinance for the town, but
the Town of Highlands doesn't have one. It appears that they are utilizing the
1 of 2 4/17/02 11:19 AM
[Fwd: April 401s]
`s
10/70 option in this case. If so, the project's reference to a 30 foot buffer
is incorrect, and the actual watershed buffer should be 100 feet. In addition,
it appears that a large amount of stream buffer will be piped and filled to
provide for impervious area. This necessitates a major variance. Please return
this application to the applicant and request that they contact the Local
Government Assistance Unit regarding this matter.
2 of 2 4/17/02 11:19 AM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Regions Bank
Project Number 01 1538
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/19/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type commercial
Certificates
Permit Wetland' Wetland Wetland Stream
Type Type Impact Score Index
County MACON
County2
Region Asheville
Stream
Class Acres
Prim. Supp. Basin Req.
Stream Impacts (ft.)
Feet
Req.
39 Stream O Y O N I 2
F - w.BTTI F CA 40,401. F - 148.00 180.00 ?-
F_ F-P 7 _0N
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y0 N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y O N
Recommendation: Q Issue Q Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 350309
Longitude (ddmmss) 831210
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
APPALACHIAN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0 1 s
LAND & WATER • DESIGN & BUILD
April 4, 2002
Michael Horan
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Highlands Regions Bank
DWQ #01-1538
Macon County
Dear Mr. Horan,
A/ I JA-1
C4 G.2

Enclosed you will find seven copies of the conservation easement (with maps) and seven
copies of a revised Appendix A - Regions Bank : Morphological Data Table for this
project (there was a typo in the table for the March 2002 submittal). If you have any
questions, I may be telephoned at 828-586-1973.
Sincerely,
1I? ? ? V ?'?, uv
Mickey B. Henson
Principal Scientist
Vice President
Appalachian Environmental Services
Post Office Box 52
Webster, NC 28788
828.586.1973 Phone
828.631.0343 Fax
[e-mail]
www.appalaclianenvironment.com
/ Triage Check List
Date: ?(( D
To: ?RRO Steve Mitdieff Project Name k _
?FRO Ken Averite DWQ Project Numbe
r

?WaRO
Deborah Sayer ?
l
County / Gr('
?WiRO Joanne Sleenhuis
?W O Jennifer Faye
ARO Mike Parker
?MRO ete Colwtlf
P
'
F
rom: Telephone (919) 733-
. ? -
The file attached is being twarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determinatim
? Wetland determinatim and distance to blue-fine surface'waters on USGW topo maps
? Minim ization/avcidace issues
? Buffer Rules (Nc-isa Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman) -
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings ;foraecuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative imps- cancems
Comments 1 r? ??l/..

APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existin Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B 64 64a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existing Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B 134 134a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
avera a slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existin Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B B4 64a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existing Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B B4 134a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull dischar e, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max de th 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existin Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B 64 Boa
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existin Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B 64 64a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existing Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B 134 134a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.03 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
avera a slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
MACON COUNTY
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this
, Regions Bank, an Alabama state-c
AP nn- 8 ?,r
"zil 17Y SEC, r;
day of 2002, by and between
»...- - v.- - ...,, u, %.,? VAU[a,
whose mailing address-
ess is Late o o aro ma tats Property ice, 16 West Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27603-
8003, Grantee. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. 4-43 143-214.8 et sea., the State of North
Carolina has established the Wetlands Restoration Program (as defined in N774en Stat. 443§143-214.8) within the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing,
and creating wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. 443 143-214.8, two of the components of the
Wetlands Restoration Program are (1) restoration and perpetual maintenance of wetlands, riparian areas, and surface
waters and (2) land ownership and management; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situate, lying, and being in Macon County,
North Carolina (the "Protected Property"), hereinafter more particularly described;
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement on the Protected Property, thereby
restricting and limiting the use of the Protected Property on the terms and conditions and for the purposes hereinafter
set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such easement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions
hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent
hereinafter set forth, over the Protected Property for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, said Protected
Property lying within Macon County, North Carolina, and being in Highlands Township, and being more
particularly described as follows:
jSEE ATTACHMENT FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY]
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, and create a wetland and/or
riparian resource on the Protected Property that contributes to the protection and improvement of water quality,
flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently
the Protected Property in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the
Protected Property that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the
following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
WINSTON 1126797x2
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. It is an easement in gross, runs with the land, and is
enforceable by Grantee against Grantor; its personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, lessees. agents.
II. RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Protected Property shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere
with the purposes of this Conservation .Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity
on, or use of, the Protected Property by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this
Conservation Easement. Any rights of use not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by
the Grantee. The following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hunting and fishing, and access to the Protected Property for the purposes thereof.
Usage of motorized recreational or non-commercial vehicles on the Protected Property is
prohibited.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to undeveloped educational uses and
the right of access to the Protected Property for such purposes including organized educational
activities such as site visits, studies, and observations.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any
vegetation on the Protected Property is prohibited, except as necessary for Grantor to maintain a
D. n ustria Use. Industrial activities are prohibited on the Protected Property.
E. Residential Use. Residential use of the Protected Property is prohibited.
F. Commercial Use. Commercial activities are prohibited on the Protected Property.
G. Agricultural Use. Agricultural use of the Protected Property including use for cropland,
waste lagoons, or pastureland is prohibited.
H. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, or other structure
constructed or placed on the Protected Property.
1. Signs. No signs shalt be permitted on the Protected Property except interpretive signs
describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Protected Property, signs
identifying the owner of the Protected Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, and
signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Protected Property.
J. Dumping. Dumping of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliance
or machinery, or other material on the Protected Property is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. Following Regions
dredging, mining, or drilling; no remova o topsot , san , gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other
materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. Following Regions'
cnanneltng, tilling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related7ac-tivities, or altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or
created drainage patterns. In addition, following Regions' development of the adiacent
commercial site, there shall be no diverting or causing or pen nittmg the diversion o surface or
underground water into, wit m or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands,
polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
M. Subdivision. Subdivision, partitioning, or ividing the Protected Property is prohibited.
N. Development Rights. No development rights which have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
The Grantee, and authorized representatives of the Grantee, shall have the right to enter the Protected
Property at all reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the
wetland and riparian resources of the Protected Property. These activities include (subiect to Grantor's rights above)
wrN,sTON 1126797v2
planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment
to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade
materials as needed to direct in-stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. In addition, the Grantee, and
authorized representatives of the Grantee, shall have the right to enter the Protected Property at all reasonable times
for the purpose of inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor is complying with the terms, conditions,
restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The easement rights granted herein do not include public
access rights.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided
that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary
from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the Wetlands Restoration Program, whose
mailing address is 1619 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619.
III. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. In the event that Grantor has violated or is threatening to violate
any of these terms, conditions, or restrictions, the Grantee may institute a suit to enjoin such
violation and if necessary, to require the restoration of the Protected Property to its prior condition
at the Grantor's expense.
B. No failure on the part of Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or
affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This Conservation Easement shall be construed to promote the purposes of N.C. Gen
Stat. 443§1143-214.8 et sea., the Wetlands Restoration Program.
B. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parries with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Protected Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is
made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by
which any interest in the Protected Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement
herein created.
V. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all rights accruing from ownership of the Protected Property, including the right
to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Protected Property that are
expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of
this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantor expressly reserves
to Grantor, and Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Protected Property, and the right
of quiet enjoyment of the Protected Property.
WINSTON 1126797v2
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor eeveaaw covenants that she), we it is seized of said premises in fee Md hay# as it
now owns constituting a portion 9 tfierotected Property n fee and has the right to convey the permanent
easement erein grante ; that the same are Ls free from encumbrances and that it will warrant and
defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. _
I
i
I
I
1
,I
i
i
R
WINSTON 1126797v2
l i . I i I li ?
4.. .............- .....?_.....i..J .... ....._«......_.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the GFeme Regions has caused this instrument to be executed in its name
by its President and attested by its Secretary, and its Corporate Seal affixed thereto by
authority n as of the day and year first above wrltten.
Secretary
(CORPORATE SEAL)
COUNTY OF GUILFORD 1
INotarTial Se] MY r* tii,r . tn? commission
expires:
Be! of , the foregoing instrument was signed by
This redlined draft, generated by CompareRite (TM) - The Instant Redliner, shows the
differences between -
original document : I:\DMS\D_LAMPEA 126797.01
and revised document: I:\DMS\D LAMPE\1126797.02
CompareRite found 40 change(s) in the text
Deletions appear as Overstrike text
Additions appear as Double Underline text
it

WINSTON 1126797v2
t {- n,, ' T d ?? vyh + 9. a;Y t Lhr'$`7 4 +td ?r Y' k?i6 ?" `?+ dot -? '.
b)
P ?i i l i p +Wa rd AM I svcu" cu LANDJSPE ' cu l z L }
Landsca Y e Architect PA:" <e 48Unks o?` P.O.Box7742•Cashl s;NoMCarblina2871T T
p e
Ph.-828.743-9951 • F8x$2&743•(W • Cell$2.8-506.87' 3 • E-flmg •Nr.*dl @dricUx,t
LAND PLANNING • SRL- DESIGN • CONSTMXTICNJ MANAC.MEN1 a.
w.
CLARE CERTIFIED 4*ti 2, y '
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY.•:
CY..?FOH LANDSCAPE. ARCHITEGTS 0 '1 ?+?'• ?j. , i. - _ .
1
717
March 13'2002'
a`
Mr.. Mike Parker .. • 4 M1 +? t
Division of Water,Quality
NCDENR ;w,f?n?. tiT 4. r,
4 p% yt'
59 Woodfin Place`
Asheville, NC- 28801 ?J t,?.; `?;,; Y SICTic_•,
RE: "Regions Bank", DWQ Project No. WQ 01-1538
Highlands, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Parker:;:' }3 s. ,
n On behalf of Regions Bank, I am submittmg.'additional information and
a ? documents' for obtaining`a 401 certification,,, Nationwide 394or tlie` above
;referenced project. ' ;The information and documents were'"prepared" through
collaboration by three fines; PhilipaWard Landscape Architecture; PA; Fish &
t ' Wildlife Associates and Appalachian Environmental Services: F
7' i'
The proposed stre'arti`impact will include filling 146': of an-Unnamed`tributary to'•
Monger Creek and installing 120' of culverf -73 X 55" cmp+,''?Furthermore, 68' '
of the stream will be realigned and restored on the outlet side of thc' proposed
culvert and approximately 135' of the. remaining stream will be restored, to an
existing culvert under' Hwy. 106. .
As a part of the proposed stream work on the site, we propose to stabilize and
enhance a small stream coming out of an existnno 24" diameter culvert Tinder

i
mitigation within a couple of weeks.
The following information and documents are

1. Restoration and Enhancement Narrative
2
Stream Restoration and Stabilization Plan
.
.
3. Stormwater Management Plan
.

in 1+++& J.t Tr ,CR. P} .?! '4?i f '"! ? ? - ? n ' i t :IC l- " .+v' ?T 1

?t? 1. w•i TY ?
?} T 11•
?
,
?
?
Y Y •. ?
s5: 7 4.? +N`
`
yy ?
,.y,? ,
.
r
d4 ?(? ?.A't! ': - ? tu...?.' @I•tO?Db
'S ..'fin
y1 4 T'1t?? r?
?±??.fX'h 11 ?S° rN{+?F 4?P c.£'t' F.:7S +' -,? ?, ., •z11-•T ? - ???';' v ???` ? i 1 > ?.y??, . _
rJ. •; m7,'?.....,r, S .-T,}:as «7rbt.,-_i v;±.. Cl' d1 >
74

?V
. t .' 4 +). _ Nye(
i. 1 eY+ k _ •`?' 9 1N r4 ?'' 'ham F' ?( 1 q T.?' ?k L ?n% ..
-., .?.. . pn-aS't•: ..?:,;,.-.. --tnwar,?•y?..; .,,,r, ,.. ,. ,. -...,,......,.r :..:'!`;' «,.?'tiy+v±6;'.. .,,?„?.:'. ,'!1s' ..
i. h Vri .tM ??, f .: ] r 1 Xf ?4.,? i

m
y t, j t nd':
° .S -'t?, Grti a Py •%i?*$ kl ? ? r??, r a? ?
.. e h ? ... ??? ?'1`4?. `.w p

?rc i t
{^ a y

4 :tty d',? .

J ?
e S
z

L J i+ { rt? S, 1

cam- :4•.: t;,k S {G':-.`'n "?^7y i??"'?K ,,.rF;.?S'dG fit., ...itk::3a ?.?r•.??"'7F"-r? _is;'pr. 't?4M,r;;.=;p-.
ti a9^,c;f•'y ?? -sr r' 't'T +i?-. tu>: x= q >,??y rifts .? ?'?;? fr ?.

t
ri

r yy
's 1 r
? ?. -r
?°
's• sad'
S?" -tt'+ T
.
} ?.
,
.
, s .
,.? ? t a1yy t w
?? ?q
`
'
T w S ' rY G(
r ,Y
r >
is 4
f
? ?
• µ ? '? ? tl 1
f 1
ar .< }it c kit v

t . , ....

Stream Mitigation and Stabilization Plan
Highlands Regions Bank
DWQ #01-1538
Regions Bank
Highlands, North Carolina
Tributary to Monger Creek
Highlands, North Carolina
March 2002
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The proposed stream impact will include filling 146' of an unnamed tributary to
Monger Creek and installing 120' of culvert, 73" X 55" cmp. Furthermore, 68' of the
stream will be realigned and restored on the outlet side of the proposed culvert and
approximately 135' of the remaining stream will be restored to an existing culvert under
Highway 106.
As a part of the proposed stream work on the site, we propose to stabilize and
enhance a small stream coming out of an existing 24" diameter culvert under Highway
106 at the west end of the site. Approximately 100' of this stream will be stabilized. I
will be submitting the conservation easement for the stream mitigation within a couple of
weeks.
CHANNEL RESTORATION
Methods
Meander Design
The approach used results in an average channel slope being determined by
meander geometry (meander wavelength, meander arc length, average width at bankfull,
meander amplitude, radius of curvature and arc angle). These approaches are based on
the assumption that the controlling factors in the stream channel (water and sediment
inputs, bed material gradation, and bank erosional resistance) will be similar to those in a
selected reference reach (either the restoration reach before disturbance or undisturbed
reaches). If the reach targeted for restoration is closely bounded by undisturbed
Regions Bank, Highlands, NC - Tributary to Monger Creek
DWQ #01-1538 Page 1
meanders, dimensions of these undisturbed reaches may be studied for use in the restored
or created reach. Please see Appendix A for the morphological measurement table.
Bankfull Determination
Visual identification of bankfull flow on large streams in alluvial bottoms is
relatively easy. However, small streams in the Southern Appalachians rarely have
alluvial bottoms. Smaller mountain streams seldom develop distinctive topographic
breaks between the bank and the floodplain common in larger streams and rivers.
Therefore, bankfull flow was estimated by observing vegetation, bare rock, washed root
lines, and changes from a steep to gentle bank slope.
We have experienced that the best indicators of bankfull flow in the Southern
Appalachians tend to be signs of repeated erosion and cleansing of banks and deposition
on point bars. Storms larger than bankfull can erode the stream banks and mask the
indicators. In the Southern Appalachians, the vegetation line is probably the most
difficult indicator to use to determine bankfull depth. Riparian vegetation in the
mountains withstands high flows and may even revegetate quickly into the bankfull area.
This is especially true with certain types of mosses. Some of the problems of
determining reliable indicators of bankfull flow stem from the stream banks being
undercut and caving in.
Particle Size Distribution
Particle size data are usually reported in terms of Di, where I represents some
nominal percentile of the distribution and Di represents the particle size, usually
expressed in millimeters, at which i percent of the total sample by weight is finer. For
example, 50 percent of the total sample would be finer than the D5o particle size. For
Regions Bank, Highlands, NC - Tributary to Monger Creek
DWQ #01-1538 Page 2
estimating size distribution in steep mountain streams with substrate much coarser than
the medium-gravel limitations of Federal Interagency Sedimentation Project (FISP)
samplers, a pebble count, in which at least 100 bed material particles are manually
collected from the streambed and measured, is used to measure particle size. At each
sample point along the cross section, a particle is retrieved from the bed, and the
intermediate axis is measured. The measurements are tabulated as to number of particles
occurring within predetermined size intervals, and the percentage of the total number in
each interval is then determined. Again, the percentage in each interval is accumulated to
give a particle size distribution, and the particle size data are reported as described above.
Please see Appendix B for the pebble counts for the existing conditions at the project site
and at the reference reach.
Shear Stress
Since boundary shear stress is the most appropriate measure of the forces driving
erosion, graphs have been developed for allowable shear stress. The average boundary
shear stress (T, lbs/ft2) acting on an open channel conveying a uniform flow of water is
given by the product of the unit weight of water (y, 62.4 lbs/ft) times the bankfull
hydraulic radius (bankfull area, Abf divided by bankfull wetted perimeter, WPbf) times the
average bankfull water surface slope (Sbf, ft/ft):
T=yRbfSbf
The diagram used to determine the maximum size particle moved during the bankfull
flow is a Shield's curve of the threshold of motion modified by Dave Rosgen during the
October, 2000 Level 4 Restoration Workshop (Appendix-A).
Regions Bank, Highlands, NC - Tributary to Monger Creek
DWQ #01-1538 Page 3
STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
Above the bankfull elevation the streambank will be sloped to the top of the bank
and vegetated. This feature benefits the stream by slowing water velocity during high
water events. This in turn reduces the amount of erosion occurring on the streambanks.
This process will increase cross-sectional area. Coconut blankets will be pinned into the
bank for short-term (4-years) stabilization. The blankets will stabilize the streambank
long enough for the vegetation to root and stabilize the stream for the long-term.
RIPARIAN RESTORATION
Historically, the riparian area consisted of grass. After the streambank is sloped it
will be seeded with native herbaceous and woody plant. Seeded sections of the bank will
be covered with coconut fiber blankets. These blankets-will protect the area from the
streambed to the top of the streambank and be stapled to the ground using metal
landscape staples. Low growing woody species such as Henry's Garnett, Silky
Dogwood, and Buttonbush will be planted. These species will be planted as cuttings or
bare rooted stock during the next dormant season. As much as possible trees that are on
site will be avoided as the streambanks are altered. On the upper banks we will plant
taller growing trees that provide shade, stable creek banks and wildlife cover and food.
The riparian restoration component of this project was broken down into a three-zone
approach. The species selected were chosen to be aesthetically pleasing and Co benefit
wildlife by providing food or habitat. We are also supporters of the Southern
Appalachian Native Plant Initiative (SAiTNPI), so we will only be using native species to
revegetate the riparian zone. The buffer will range from 20 to 30 feet in width on each
side of the stream channel. The buffer will be planted with a minimum of 400
Regions Bank, Highlands, NC - Tributary to Wnger Creek
DWO #01-1538 Page 4
trees/bushes per acre (native species). The survival rate after 5 years will be 320 trees per
acre.
MONITORING
Physical Monitoring Plan
Stream channel morphology will be monitored based on the existing data
conditions for three-years following the restoration. An annual report will be submitted
to NC DWQ for review. Monitoring will be conducted at permanent riffle and pool cross
sections. A longitudinal profile and pebble counts will be conducted annually.
Additionally, tree and bush survival rate will be monitored in a manner that demonstrates
a survival rate of 320 trees per acre. Species survival will consist of checking each
individual plant. Plants will be checked for overall condition and health. A report will be
prepared with the previous information.
Macrobenthos Monitoring Plan
David Penrose stated that macrobenthic monitoring will not be required on
projects shorter than 1000 feet.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
A conservation easement will be submitted at a later date.
Regions Bank, Highlands, NC - Tributary to Monger Creek
DWQ #01-1538 Page 5
APPENDIX A
Regions Bank : Morphological Measurement Table
Variables Existin Channel Proposed Reach Reference Reach
1. stream type Degraded B B4 64a
2. drainage area 0.13 mil 0.13 mil 0.09 mil
3. bankfull width 6.0-7.0 ft 9.5 ft 6.00-7.0 ft
4. bankfull mean depth 1.0-0.9 ft 0.65 ft 0.8-0.4 ft
5. width/de th ratio 6.0-7.8 14.62 7.5-17.5
6. bankfull cross-sectional
area 6.1-6.6 ft2 6.175 ft2 4.8-2.5 ft2
7. bankfull mean velocity 7.12 ft/s 7.02 ft/s 5.2 ft/s
8. bankfull discharge, cfs 44.87 cfs 43.37 cfs 14.54 cfs
9. bankfull max depth 1.2-1.4 ft 0.9 ft 0.6-1.3 ft
10. width of flood prone area 13.3-13.6 ft 13.3 ft 8.7-11.00 ft
11. entrenchment ratio 2.2-2.0 1.4 1.45-1.57
12. meander length 75.0 ft 60.0 ft 82.0 ft
13. ratio of meander length to
bankfull width 12.5-10.7 6.3 13.7-11.7
14. Radius of curvature 24.7 ft 18.5 ft 24.3 ft
15. Ratio of radius of curvature
to bankfull width 4.1-3.5 2.0 4.1-3.5
16. Belt width 6.1 10.3 9.6
17. Meander width ratio 1.0-0.9 1.1 1.6-1.4
18. Sinuosity 1.0 1.21 1.21
19. Valle Sloe 0.02 ft/ft 0.02 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
20. Average sloe 0.02 ft/ft 0.03 ft/ft 0.05 ft/ft
21. Pool sloe 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.05-0.08 ft/ft 0.07-0.10 ft/ft
22. Ratio of pool slope to
average slope 2.5-4.0 1.67-2.67 1.4-2.0
23. Maximum pool depth 1.4 ft 1.0 ft 1.3 ft
24. Ratio of pool depth to
average bankfull depth 1.4-1.6 1.54 1.6-3.25
25. Pool width 7.0 ft 7.0 ft 7.0 ft
26. Ratio of pool width to
bankfull width 0.9-1.0 0.74 0.9-1.0
27. Pool to pool spacing 15-20 ft 10-15 ft 10-15 ft
28. Ratio of pool to pool
spacing to bankfull width 2.9-2.4 1.1-1.6 2.1-1.8
CO 00 CD 00 CO v O CD In M CO to
0 r:l 0 0) O CD 00 r N CD 00 C7 n N N N N
V O r o0 w N r' N M OV dO V dO
O T T T T T T T T
+O' O O) (D O N O N O O CD O) O O O
O O V 'It t- N CI) OO C7 r It ;T 4 0 0 0
-0-01 Q) M M N ?T t? r--:
TOO O V
d ?
? O
a O N O M n t? - O O N 0 0 0 0
E O T T N
O
U
El Lo r- LO O C D w.,. tF v v ., rtr v
7 0 r a r C~7 P,-: CM d T T V ?t ?Y V
C) LO
Co O Ch C--\j 't ? O 't CD CMD ? n r- ? r- r"
T T T T T T T T T
It CCA O 00 U)
0 mLQ9N? Lq grONOOOO
o O C7 rte- N CD Cl) N r 1? C[) 0 0 0 0
N
0 ? -- Cl) w cm TCtChOOOOO
H
O 00 r, r- N r- r-
OOOOOO)?4 bC'' 7NOR 0OO0OR
UOOOC?? OOp r- 0)(Dm0)
0 0 0 T CO 6L006 rco? T T N N N N N
0 T T T T T T T
++ O O O O O N N t? co
O O O O O O
D O O O M T O CD O O O
0 0 0 0 T r CM7 N N I? O? N 0 0 0
N ?
R: O O O T"t Or M N- CD ? N O O O O
V
R
MMd
1.L
m
c
L
(D
0)
cc
C
3
O
U
d
.O
d
a
O 44

N N
N N +.
L .?
Ucn E
Q? O
L ma
y ulU UMMO
L W MO O L
-G
a CO = =a R oca0)? W
0a,m
o

g O
U UE aE
>,cn?cn
n

ENN?OO ?CO?rNOOp
0 O N In Lq O N ? CG N '' 00 CO O' , N
O O C O T T M Cp r N O
C T

El cD r O O O r` n Lo m m m m Lo Lo
OM000OOm00NNNNNNNN
Voaorm?NNVDV VdOVNr
T T T T T r T T T
O O O O O "?t c! U) 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o000DONm0 0mcC 600000
'C
O
C ?
R3 CV O N r? CO "t MO d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C O T r r N O "t N N
GO H
U
U 6 to 6 r- r- N r` r U) / ICJ M t) LO O
O r r C 7 CO 0 d O r r` r` r r r r r`
T T r T T T T T T T
£ O O 0 O`° 000. ?? 'IT v v It
= (? ? O 4 N r
+?„ 0 0 0 N N CA 0 d' x_ 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FO00co 00LO 'V'PO000000
r r N N LO r r
0
N
00 M ma- L. oTNOODN0000000
CL °
H
oLo o?rr-r-r?rr.r.
O N N 0 0 0 N O 00 00 00 00 O 00
VCOC'MLnr TLO ONNNNNTNN
r T T T r T T T
0+00000r, 000000000
0 0 0 m CD CO "I: °? C? (D O o 0 0 0 0
~ vi O r CV r N- N N 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
O O
m O r N D N a co N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T
'O = Q1 > N i N i +?
C 'a > > i. O
d r t0N > i cc X
t6 ? ? ? ? 3 O V
4) 0
+?- d 7 N R? d iUUm°mm -
LL?U U >,tnJy? J
> >
4)
in
a?
'o
a
C
O
O
U
O
W
CL
E N N O O O co CD N N It LO ? co -tr
O
V O N l1) ltd O N 7 CG Ca r' 00 C1 O'
N
Q - C r O r CM (D N N" NO A
C T

ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
REGIONS BANK TRACT, SPRING STREET
HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA
DWQ Project No. WQO1-1538
Introduction
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc. performed an environmental assessment of the Regions
Bank tract on the corner of Spring Street and Highway 106 in Highlands, North Carolina
for the purpose of obtaining permits to construct a banking facility at this location. The
tract was evaluated for existing conditions including aquatic resources, plant community,
wildlife habitat, threatened and endangered species, and other environmental
considerations.
Existing Conditions
Land use in the area is a combination of residential and commercial. The property is
bounded on the north and west by roads. To the east is a private residence and to the
south is a lumber yard. There is an abandoned pumping station on the southwest corner
of the tract which can be removed. The tract is undeveloped, but has been cleared. Fill
has been placed in portions of the tract up to depths of seven feet.
Terrestrial Resources
The Macon County soil map shows the project area to have two soil complexes.
Edneyville-Chestnut-Urban soils are found in the northern portions of the tract. The
Edneyville and Chestnut soils are deep and well drained. The Urban soils refers to
impervious areas such as roads and sidewalks.
Along the stream, the soil map shows the presence of Tuckasegee-Whiteside complex.
These soils are deep and well drained. Usually Whiteside is found along the drainageway
with Tuckasegee between drainageways. This complex often has inclusions of
Dellwood, Nikwasi, and Sylva soils. Nikwasi and Sylva soils are found around springs
and are poorly drained.
Most of the tract is not vegetated. There are hemlocks and rhododendron along the
stream on the south side of the tract. The area has some white pine and privet in the
center of the tract, and there are briars and other shrubs along the stream.
Wildlife Habitat
There is minimal habitat for terrestrial wildlife on the site. Some nesting and shelter is
available for birds, although no nests or cavity holes were observed. The area could
potentially support small rodents and mammals.
Aquatic Resources
There are two tributaries that flow across this tract. The larger stream is an unnamed
tributary of Munger Creek. It enters the property on the east side and flows along the
southern boundary of the tract, exiting under Highway 106. This tributary has moderate
sinuosity in the middle section, but has been channelized in the lower portion of the tract.
Sediment from unknown sources has accumulated in the creek.
A second smaller unnamed tributary flows along the western boundary of the tract,
joining the first tributary just before it enters the culvert under the road. This stream has
been channelized.
Other aquatic resources on the tract include a spring and associated wetland. These are
located approximately in the middle of the tract. Standing water was observed during the
field survey, but no flow. The approximate size of the wetland is 0.05 acres. Function of
this wetland includes biological habitat and filtration. Due to its small size, there is little
capability of water storage.
Threatened and Endangered Species
The current list of federally threatened and endangered species for Macon County
includes four threatened and three endangered species. The federally threatened species
include the bog turtle, spotfin chub, small whorled pogonia, and Virginia spiraea. There
is no habitat for the spotfin chub, small whorled pogonia, or Virginia spiraea in the
project area. There is limited habitat for the bog turtle. None of these species were found
during the field review.
The three endangered species listed for Macon County are the Appalachian elktoe,
littlewing pearlywing mussel, and rock gnome lichen. There is no habitat for any of these
species in the project area.
In addition to the above mentioned species, there are five threatened and twelve
endangered species on the state list. All of the animals can be eliminated from
consideration due to lack of habitat, except Appalachian Bewick's wren. Of the plants,
Queen-of-the-prairie, fringed gentian, and holy grass could potentially grow at the
project. However, no evidence was found that any of these organisms are utilizing the
area.
It is the Biological Opinion of the investigator, Pamela M. Boaze, Senior Biologist Fish
and Wildlife Associates Inc., that no listed or proposed species of concern will be
affected by development of this property.
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS
Alternative I - No build
The option of building at a different location was considered as an alternative. One of the
criteria for the location of the new bank was to locate on a principal street zoned
commercial in the Town of Highlands. A thorough search of the possible lots with
sufficient acreage to accommodate the building, drive through, and parking required for
the bank did not yield any other possibilities.
This alternative was rejected as no other suitable location was found within the current
zoning restrictions.
Alternative II - Spring Street
The building would be located on the parcel at the corner of Spring Street and Highway
106. The drive through would be located on the west side of the building with parking
mostly on the east side.
This alternative would require that 180 linear feet of the unnamed tributary along the
south boundary of the property be piped. The remaining 120 feet would remain open as
would the smaller tributary along the western boundary of the tract. The wetland in the
center of the property, 0.05 acres, would be filled. The fill would be sloped back toward
the creek and vegetated to maintain a riparian buffer. Mitigation would include
restoration of both the smaller unnamed tributary that has been previously channelized
and the lower portion of the larger unnamed tributary.
This is the preferred alternative. Further discussion is included in Minimization of
Impacts and Mitigation Proposal.
Alternative III - Spring Street
This alternative is similar to Alternative II with respect to the location of the building and
parking facilities. At the request of the Town of Highlands, the entire length of the larger
tributary would be piped and the fill extended. The stream receives a considerable
amount of litter from the lumber operation adjacent to the site on the southern boundary.
The Town is concerned with the litter accumulation and the difficulty of cleaning the
stream site. A 20 foot alley between the two parcels has been filled by the lumber yard
and created a steep bank.
This alternative would entail filling the wetland and piping 270 linear feet of the larger
tributary. Approximately 30 linear feet of this tributary would remain open. Sufficient
area for buffer zones along the remaining section of creek and the second tributary is
present. Mitigation would include restoration of the smaller tributary and an off-site
location.

Minimization of Impacts
Alternative I was rejected as there was no other suitable parcel available. Alternative III
was rejected as it impacts more of the stream resources than Alternative II, requires more
mitigation, and cannot be fully mitigated on site. Alternative II was considered the
preferred alternative as it minimizes the amount of aquatic resource impacted by the
project and mitigation can be achieved on-site.
The Spring Street tract is rectangular in shape and encompasses 1.0 acres. The proposed
Regions Bank Branch office requires 6000 square feet for the building, the drive through
and parking requires 2188 square feet, and the walkways will cover 1600 square feet for a
total of 0.7 acres. To minimize impacts to the aquatic resources on the site, the building
is situated to the eastern side of the tract, leaving as much space as possible on the
western side. This will maximize the area for stormwater retention, flood plain, and
stream restoration potential.
Mitigation Proposal
Environmental impacts of the project include filling 0.05 acres of wetlands, piping 146
linear feet of stream, and realigning 68 linear feet of stream. Regions Bank requests that
no mitigation be required for the filling of the wetlands as the size is under 0.1 acre.
Regions Bank proposes to mitigate the piping and alteration of the 154 feet of the larger
tributary by restoring the patten, dimension, and profile of the two tributaries on the site.
The smaller tributary has been channelized and is 100 linear feet in length from the bend
after exiting the culvert to its confluence with the larger tributary. The larger tributary
does not at present have any meanders in the section to be restored. A total of 200 linear
feet will be restored. Both streams will be restored as type B streams with step pools and
meanders. Native vegetation will be used to stabilize the banks and establish a riparian
buffer. These will be chosen such that wildlife habitat potential is enhanced as well as
maintaining an aesthetically pleasing landscape.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
'.2. Print Owner/Signing Officials name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and
its compliance): .
1. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
Telephone Number:
H

4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, lettefs, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
5.
6. Directions to
7.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
(from nearest major intersection): F" Us HHY (A NG Y Z?

Dade: of facility
Contact persoi n`` W who T -scan answer questions about the facility: Q, Nam --841 IA) Telephone Number. yZ/ )143-a540
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): . -4-New _,Renewal Modification
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list
the existing pem ut number and its issue date (if known)
Form SWU-101 April 1998
Page 1 of 4
Location of Facility (street address): , _
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
CAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404 Permit
IIY PROJECT INFORMATION
1. > In the space provided below, summarize how stormzwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
- - (one to two pages) descabing stormwater management for the project.
$Z2 10
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total ProjectArea:-L?acres 4. ProjectBuiltUpon Area :
5. How many drainage basins does the project have? 6. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two drainage basins in
the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin provided in the same format as
below.
I Other on-site I 1 ( *--t:
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above
IV.
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded.
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 2 of 4
Impervious area is defined as the Ailt upon rea including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking
areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will nun with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this ?section:
Designated agent C.&,idual or firms Y kA
Phone: ( "4D ) Z+ .5 -O`2 L!'U Fax t f®G n 1 14 27
VI. SUBMITTAL REQ
This application package will not be accepted by the Division of Water Quality unless all of the applicable
items are included with the submittal
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by signing your initials in the
space provided next to each item.
A ' ant's Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP (see Attachment A)
' • Permit application processing fee (see Attachment A) -
Two copies of plans and specifications including:
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm - ?
- Legend '
- North arrow
Scale ,
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage basins delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) C I EF&k
certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct, tha the projec will be
constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the deed restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A of this form will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed projec es wit1ft"f irements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000.
Dale 6 ?1. /A/
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 3 of 4
ATTACHMENT A
1. Deed Restriction Language
The following statements must be recorded for all low density projects and for all projects that involve the.
subdivision and selling of lots or outparcels:
1. No more than square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the
edge of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures including
asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but not including wood decking or
the surface of swimming pools. This covenant is intended to insure continued compliance with the
stormwater permit issued by the State of North Carolina. The covenant may not be changed or
deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No one may fill in, pipe, or alter any roadside swale except as necessary to provide a minimum
driveway crossing.
NOTE: If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built upon area for each lot
For commercial projects that'have outparcels or future development the following statements must also be
recorded:
3. The connection from the outparcel. or future area into the stormwater system must be made into the
forebay such that short-circuiting of the system does not occur.
4. All built-upon area from the outparcel or future development must be directed into the permitted
stormwater control system. '
5. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit mod cation prior to
construction.
For curb outlet systems, the following statement in addition to items 1 and 2 above must be recorded:
6. No one may pipe, fill in or alter any designated 100 foot long grassed swale used to meet the
requirements of NCAC 2H .1008(g)..
2. Supplement Forms
The applicable supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project:
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104 Low Density Supplement _
Form SW U 105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU 106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU-107 .. Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108 Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy Supplement
3. Permit Application Fees (check made payable to NCDENR and submitted to the appropriate Regional
Office)
Type of Permit
Low Density
High Density
fetor s Certification
General Permit
New, Modification, or
Late Renewal
$225
$385
$22
$350
$50
Timely Renewal Without
Modification
n/a
$225
n/a
n/a
n/a
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 4 of 4
??! IcNh #?rIK
MAC
I°= 20Q0'
Si?Mw,6T? MbN??M?11'r 314162--
g??IV14TI at Rg?A#10
sIzlN4 GoM?uT,a?'(io?t?
AgeA
I
MFwtOUL7
172.0
o,9o
1511m?
lb?N17?E?7 4$-7 I Sr-. 0#25
-- - 1 , 21
S
jo-TA4., ' 2?074 z7 f
I -701
sIZe; w rr?? ?-:PQND W
0105 x ,(o,,o, _ ?3C? (?? 9 00
# 2 0
AT+
I M vr::f VI0Ul 1 Z, oZo ?pf OIF90
----3111% 17fr- 017r7
'(oT ? 15191?p SF
l0?$18
°!169
!I Q01
WITH, 0,05 ? I I, Q)07 = 59 0 ( uc7f? (ooo s??
- t t,#j s
.A ns..?go ? g9
?a4y 502
;,, ?? . ?b 1W3P? r /11
io? iz loi
?vloF??iorl Af? gYPl
(OVW..-FL44
14415: ?Ya
t'CY {o ?aN ?T
i?- 1 I.L 045-Fr-Low t fit""O c G? 1 N I T ?ID
N ( •
VP4 FEF,
0,90),c S,Ot< 0,151 Act
f3 -7
s 3 Qn ?? (0, 0'24 i1
fF:
?io?7??lliat # z
zy `Gib
QZ? = O,`lo l< 810 ?C o,-W Ac, - 2.7 Gbh
Z t-7.1:'(?,OZ,4? ? j$
f

J

E4 .
yyµ
U us
"

s I
t•I t7

_
T
?55?oNLi g6NK
CUt,V??'( pl? sll_I
-fo-rA41 VF-,&-j r
C?iMWI?lb? - 24 ©,ei
ilbl. (Fug?p? - 51 , 0130
of GoN N4o
TF&-T
CH7 ISO
IN7 (7Z$
1147TI?N471'C`( Ti?f 0 Zq = S.S INj/?,?,.F

24 A o, 05
51 ? 01770 i?177
toWzloi
N 1)
•? Wn
o:ix
A •M
8.9 MIDI,
-7r,5
rzocl
Nor(c??'a13F,
4W = 6, 5'
Q ° 20q L?2
b' 4,33'
GuL?'f G4.Pb6 l'C`(
??
Fom 41*45- Gl- 11 4 '--'7 11 AJU 6 tMf
c u cv?-r
?3??c 14 Ghta j' tS f?vb.llb??
,,, ?? ply SUTLI E?--F
I'
Exhibit 13
.o
8,000
Iw-T'x101-i'4000
4 t2)
18'-4'x 9'-3' 3,000• EXAMPLE .
4 3r
Size, 31r X tg*.
* 12'-10'x 8'-4' 2,000 0.20 eta 3 4
d
Ed ? •*' ttw 3 .
a t D (fast) 3
IC it 1,000 (1) 1.10 2.0
-, 800 !21 LIS t.t 2
(3) 1•22 2.2
z 600 40 is toot >t =
S 800
8'-2' x W-9' 400 .'i
300 1.8 LS
71. DO x s'-1•
00
,r
a_ 72• x 44' U. 100 /? 1.0 1.0
Q. 0 .g0 / 3 .
? f. / .9 1.0
L 65* x 40' a 60 m .9
W
N 58' x 36' . W 80 / IC
'g •8
a Ix 40 U.
x v 30 / .a
a 50' x 31, to /
p 20 .T .7
to
W Mw
N ENTRANCE
43"x 2T' SCALE
TYPE _
/? fl) Hesdwoll• IL
•6
10' w (2I • Milorod to conform O 'g
d /? g to slops •6
z 36• 7.22' 6 (3). Projecting 3
a:
15
i G
a .8
a 4 To ass scale (Y) or (3) project ' _ .S •B
29 x 18 3 horizontally to seals (1), then
use straight inclined line through
0 and 0 Weiss, a reveres as
.25 x 16' 2 illestrated.
.4 .4 .4
22' x 13' 1.0 ??- a --'
.8 1
D
18' x 111 .S .38 35 •3S
*ADDITIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG
C. M. PIPE ARCH CULVERTS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC SOAOS JAN. 1963 WITH INLET CONTROL
VI-13
_•.
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc. performed an environmental assessment of the Regions
Bank tract on the corner of Spring Street and Highway 106 in Highlands, North Carolina
for the purpose of obtaining permits to construct a banking facility at this location. The
tract was evaluated for existing conditions including aquatic resources, plant community,
wildlife habitat, threatened and endangered species, and other environmental
considerations.
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ?710, w? Cl
REGIONS BANK TRACT, SPRING STREET
HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA NEAR 2 2 2002
DWQ Project No. WQ01-1538
WET ANDS GROUP
1?l?,TE? QUALITY SECTION' _
Introduction ® 1 1, 5 3' 4
Existing Conditions
Land use in the area is a combination of residential and commercial. The property is
bounded on the north and west by roads. To the east is a private residence and to the
south is a lumber yard. There is an abandoned pumping station on the southwest corner
of the tract which can be removed. The tract is undeveloped, but has been cleared. Fill
has been placed in portions of the tract up to depths of seven feet.
Terrestrial Resources
The Macon County soil map shows the project area to have two soil complexes.
Edneyville-Chestnut-Urban soils are found in the northern portions of the tract. The
Edneyville and Chestnut soils are deep and well drained. The Urban soils refers to
impervious areas such as roads and sidewalks.
Along the stream, the soil map shows the presence of Tuckasegee-Whiteside complex.
These soils are deep and well drained. Usually Whiteside is found along the drainageway
with Tuckasegee between drainageways. This complex often has inclusions of
Dellwood, Nikwasi, and Sylva soils. Nikwasi and Sylva soils are found around springs
and are poorly drained.
Most of the tract is not vegetated. There are hemlocks and rhododendron along the
stream on the south side of the tract. The area has some white pine and privet in the
center of the tract, and there are briars and other shrubs along the stream.
Wildlife Habitat
There is minimal habitat for terrestrial wildlife on the site. Some nesting and shelter is
available for birds, although no nests or cavity holes were observed. The area could
potentially support small rodents and mammals.
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND MINIMIZATION OF IMPACTS
Alternative I - No build
The option of building at a different location was considered as an alternative. One of the
criteria for the location of the new bank was to locate on a principal street zoned
commercial in the Town of Highlands. A thorough search of the possible lots with
sufficient acreage to nCrnmmnr1ntP the 1,,,;1Ai"- .a-- --.J _ __ _ -3 c_
Aquatic Resources
There are two tributaries that flow across this tract. The larger stream is an unnamed
tributary of Munger Creek. It enters the property on the east side and flows along the
southern boundary of the tract, exiting under Highway 106. This tributary has moderate
sinuosity in the middle section, but has been channelized in the lower portion of the tract.
Sediment from unknown sources has accumulated in the creek.
A second smaller unnamed tributary flows along the western boundary of the tract,
joining the first tributary just before it enters the culvert under the road. This stream has
been channelized.
Other aquatic resources on the tract include a spring and associated wetland. These are
located approximately in the middle of the tract. Standing water was observed during the
field survey, but no flow. The approximate size of the wetland is 0.05 acres. Function of
this wetland includes biological habitat and filtration. Due to its small size, there is little
capability of water storage.
Threatened and Endangered Species
The current list of federally threatened and endangered species for Macon County
includes four threatened and three endangered species. The federally threatened species
include the bog turtle, spotfin chub, small whorled pogonia, and Virginia spiraea. There
is no habitat for the spotfin chub, small whorled pogonia, or Virginia spiraea in the
project area. There is limited habitat for the bog turtle. None of these species were found
during the field review.
The three endangered species listed for Macon County are the Appalachian elktoe,
littlewing pearlywing mussel, and rock gnome lichen. There is no habitat for any of these
species in the project area.
In addition to the above mentioned species, there are five threatened and twelve
endangered species on the state list. All of the animals can be eliminated from
consideration due to lack of habitat, except Appalachian Bewick's wren. Of the plants,
Queen-of-the-prairie, fringed gentian, and holy grass could potentially grow at the
project. However, no evidence was found that any of these organisms are utilizing the
area.
It is the Biological Opinion of the investigator, Pamela M. Boaze, Senior Biologist Fish
and Wildlife Associates Inc., that no listed or proposed species of concern will be
affected by development of this property.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONTORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
?'? 101 ? {c
'.2. Print owner/Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and
its compliance):.. ? , .-,l -1 A-7 _ . 1 ... , ? ..?, , .-.-.-.:•-r J" a Mailing Address for

Telephone Number:

4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, lette ,operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
5.. Location of Facility (street address):
MT71"Xiaz e--V Gbal G 44WY i ofv.
6. Directions to
7.
(from nearest major intersection): V-" U S HHY 64 , Nc ?W- z?,
of facility
$` Contact person who can answer questions about the facility: -.?? Q/?,,
`T?.. -o54 L.001
Naomi W P 1AM2 Telephone Number. (L2 0 )-7/?
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): . -X-New . Renewal Mod cation
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list
the a &tk gpennit and its issue date (if known)
Form SWU-101 April 1998 - Page 1 of 4
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
LAMA Major _. - Sedimentation/Erosion Control
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
General Permit
404 Permit
Other
L In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) descrbing stormwater management for the project.
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total Project Area: Z acres 4. Project Built Upon Area:
5. How many drainage basins does the project have? 41?
6. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two drainage basins in
the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin provided in the same format as
below. "
On site
I Other on-site I I AA G I .L ' I
Impervious area is defined as the bUt upon
areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above
IV,

Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded.
but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 2 of 4
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. . AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
DesignedagentCn div ualorfi=y,
Phone: t ` 7J? 1 -74.-4-7 "'05- JC Fax
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
This application package will not be accepted by the Division of Water Quality unless all of the applicable
items are included with the submittal
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by signing your initials in the
space provided next to each item.
A ' ant's Initials
• Original and one copy of the Storrawater Management Permit Application Form
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP (see Attachment A)
` • Permit application processing fee (see Attachment A)
• Two copies of plans and specifications including: ' A?------
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management 1: Ly JL?+
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm -'2
- Legend '
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date '
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage basins delineated
Vegetated buffers (where required)
VIL APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) C, ff?gg
certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct, that. the projec willbe
constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the deed restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A of this form will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed projec'mm 'es wi 'rements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000.
Siae: Data 6 °l
Form SA U-101 April 1998 Page 3 of 4
ATTACIMENT A
.1. Deed Restriction Language
The following statements must be recorded for all low density projects and for all projects that involve the
subdivision and selling of lots or outparcels:
T . No more than square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the
edge of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures including
asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but not including wood decking or
the surface of swimming pools. This covenant is intended to insure continued compliance with the
stormwater permit issued by the State of North Carolina. The covenant may not be changed or
deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No one may fill in, pipe, or alter any roadside swale except as necessary to provide a minimum
driveway crossing.
NOTE: If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listirig each lot
number, size and the allowable built upon area for each lot
For commercial projects that'have outparcels or future development the following statements mast also be
recorded:
3. The connection from the outparcel. or future area into the stormwater system must be made into the
forebay such that short-circuiting- of the system does not occur.
•k
4. All built-upon area from the outparcel or future development must be directed into the permitted
. stormwater control system. •
5. Buflt-upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit modification prior to
construction.
For curb outlet systems, the following statement in addition to items 1 and 2 above must be recorded:
6. No one may pipe, fill in or alter any designated 100 foot long grassed Swale used to meet the
requirements of NCAC 2H .1008(g).•
2. SupplementForms
The applicable supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project:
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104 Low Density Supplement _
Form SWU-105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SW U 106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SW U 107 .. Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108 Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy Supplement
3. Permit Application Fees (check made payable to NCDENR and submitted to the appropriate Regional
Office)
Type of Permit
Low Density
High Density
Qp>
Director's Certification
General Permit
New, Modification, or
Late Renewal
$225
$385
$350
$50
Timely Renewal Without
Modification
• n/a
$225
n/a
n/a
n/a
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 4 of 4
k??G IcNh ?IK
?iFUUi,?dh Qap? MAP
40.0
I°= 20QD'
62.
Fi ;'? S a w
A x,
Im iout7 17 LOS eif o,9o
1?4%4%FaV 4$- _l Sr-0, 2'5 2 i S
?o 2.2j074 zf ICo i-70'
? izc-, w rtH eQND W -
0,05 x ,logo, = S3?i (U l7e, °Icb
?olope-TW-1014 2 0
Su
11 C11 1lei x
iMj?v?ou?
1 Z, OZo ?pf 0190 lo?StB
7 ;,lr7(,, 4,7fr- 0? Zri °f $`l
-Told(, 15191(0 S F
11 Q) 01
X12 w ITR 5m17 ew
0, 05 A. I I X07 = 690
ut7f? ?oo sf)
;!, P-? loath ?Ij? i??z Iot
fvlop?'fsNTiorl ?&7F? (ovi-r-FFL44
W J+f5N
?rfl' of

g1c???fohl .? ?
y7z?-
QZy=? I?
497-

Q Z vi 'Z.0190 X 90?< 0,-,?7 AC, . 2,7
--;s :7 4FI7
,:? 1-7 (0 t 0 24 3/0
loz
:PC ia-tSOTior4 # z

V= 14v,
z 177 (?,OZ4?
0 rOZZ`
Ill" uyE 14??
CuLV'fi ?I7--lH6

? L?N1? U
Ga1M b - AG
1 10-r,14..., f4iU? = -71"e?e r
It??IZ?o1
rip,
.10 •9,?:?•
0.1
•
501 Al
:mot :? ?• ,
S. l
-TG = - $O
8,°l
lZ?b tZ , '
0130
3 y - 3 p zZLM
Irl'(?N?i11Y ?? = 5.S INj/T-1,.?.
24 ?c o, Sr7 = 2o,4'
51 0,770' 1
-75 X511
- D.48
-P5
?-SW f FOM llk45- (a= ?'',>c 4'-'7 a A?l,FE KWIC
NOmo&f?o ,
4w rp? 5'
209 4.7
G t5
b 1,57' 7
aZy = 0.4a /.. 5,s /. -75= 20cl 1-7
42??i Gul.Vf ?.? 44f&C 1 ly
.. ; K?+IoN? lK
??LITf-
.644 6twT
?3'??c ?f114 Gh'l' l? ?vb.11.,6F?
-F 5? GuffL4
??i
?. o
Exhibit 13
at??i ?rIK -+I IQFIIo1&Wi?i
.5,000
4 000 (1)
15'-4`x s'-3•
3,000
EXAMPLE 4

C2)
4 3)

*
12'-10% 8'-4'
2,000 Slat: 3i' a 22' .
an 20 ate
3 4.
`? t_ 41' Its 3
a w D (test) 3
I I'-5'x T-3' (q 1.10 2.0
W ? 1x000

800 (2) 1.15 2.1 2

a,
9,-64 z 6'-5' 111)' 1.22 2.2
Z v 00 aD in tat 2 2
a e 5
500
x 5'-9' 400 •s
300 1.5 !.5
7'-0' It 5'-1%
00

o:

LL

72• x 44

100 r
1.0

'
' Z 80 x .9 1.0
c 65
x 40 a 60

58' z 36' -50
a

><
a
a 40 .g
= 30
Q 50'x31' to

w
w .7
.T
N
w //

'
' 20
O SCALE ENTRANCE
z
.T-
H 43
/
It 27 TYPE
x

d 10
8 (2) -Mitered to confers
to slope O
cc .6
.d
Z36' F. 22'
Q 6
(3). Projecting
3
5 0
°? 4 w .5 .5 5
29' x 18' To ate scale (2) or (3) ore)ect
3 horizontally to scale (1), then
see straight inclined line throagh
D and 0 wales, ei reverse as
254116, 2 illustrated.
I
22'x 13'
1.0
?""_' a _"?
• 4
.4
4
.

I8' x 11'
.6 '
.35
35 .35
.
*'ADDITIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG C. M. PIPE-AR CH CULVERTS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADSJAX1963 WITH INLET CONTROL
VI-13
w
February 28, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. C. Breck Patterson
Regions Bank
P.O. Box 2379
Highlands, NC 28741
Re: DWQ 011538
Regions Bank _
Macon County
Attn: Mr. Patterson:
On December 10, 2001, the Division of Water Quality wrote to you conceming.your plans to impact 180 linear
feet of streams regarding the proposed impacts to an UT to Monger Creek in Macon County. This letter informed you that
the project was incomplete and was being placed on hold until the additional information outlined in the letter was
supplied. To date, we have not received this additional information. Unless we hear from you in writing within 3 weeks of
the receipt of this letter, we will consider that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will retire the file and
consider the application as withdrawn. Please be aware that reapplication for this project will require a Certification fee r
and new applications.
Please call Mr. Mike Horan of my staff at 919-733-3574 if you would like to discuss this matter.
n erely your
J orney
Wetla dsl4 1_.Unit Supervi or
Cc: File copy
Central files
f t
Asheville DWQ Regional Office's'
Asheville Regulatory Field Office+US Army Corps of Engineers
5 ? eta, .w ? w f ,ati r -
sr
tl f -- trl
I i Yd?q.,r? jYl r
41 0
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center . Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. [phone] Custorrie? Service
"`1 800 623-7748
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 10, 2001
Mr. C. Breck Patterson
Regions Bank
Post Office Box 2379
Highlands, North Carolina 28741
Subject:
Dear Mr. Patterson:
?f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Mt 1820
Review of 401 Certification
Regions Bank
DWQ Project No. WQ 01-1538
Macon County
I have reviewed the 401 Certification Application submitted by you
for proposed stream impacts to an unnamed tributary to Monger Creek,
which is classified as WS-III waters. Based on my review, additional
information will be needed before a determination can be made on the 401
Water Quality Certification. The following is a list of items needed:
1. The proposed project will impact approximately 180 feet of
stream. According to the requirements of the Division of Water
Quality all stream impacts greater than 150 feet requires
mitigation. If you wish to pursue piping of this stream, a
formal mitigation plan will need to be submitted for review and
approval.
2. If you are going to modify your plan such as relocating the
stream, then modifications to the application should be submitted
for review. Please follow the relocation guidelines listed in
the Division's "Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North
Carolina
3. As stated above the stream is classified as WS-III waters which
means it is protected for public water supply. There is a 30
foot buffer requirement associated with all WS-III waters.
Before you proceed with this project you should obtain approval
from Macon County for your project. Please provide a letter of
approval from Macon County, should you wish to continue work on
59 Woodliin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
Mr. C. Breck Patterson
December 10, 2001
Page Two
4. You will have to comply with the Division's stormwater
requirements and other stream monitoring requirements (biological
and physical) may be necessary depending on the final design of
the project.
Your application is being placed on hold for our processing due to
incomplete information. The information listed above is needed by the
Division of Water Quality in order for us to determine whether your
project is approvable. By copy of this letter we are advising the Corps
of Engineers of your project status. We will begin processing your
applica 8ckpwe receive a complete application.
If you have questions, please call me at 828-251-6208.
Sincceerelyy,,
Michael R. Parker
Environmental Chemist
xcc: Phillip Ward
Dave Baker
Todd St.John/Dave Penrose
Kevin Barnett-
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Regions Bank
Project Number 01 1538
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/19/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type `commercial
County MACON
County2
Region Asheville
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. am
39 Stream O T O N F-- 2-21-4 wsm CA 40,401. F 148.00 180.00 F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 350309 Longitude (ddmmss) 831210
Comments:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
(Division of Water Quality
MEMO From: Date: L6 '
To: I'I Ad J C +' Subject:
) t) * 1, " lie '?'
?S N
U4
Y ' -7-0
4 C'k
III) Vc rlia/"'_
--Ib 6
ILPIWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 / Phone: [phone]
P hilip Ward "'N "
Landscape Architect, P.A.
LAND PLANNING • SITE DESIGN
L A R B C E R T I F I E D
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
October 15, 2001
Mr. Mike Parker
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: "Regions Bank"
Highlands, North Carolina `
Dear Mr. Parker:
48 Links Drive • P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717
Ph.-828-743-9951 • Fax,828-743-0687 • cell,?IMI • EinaiFwardl @dneLnet
On behalf of Regions Bank, I am submitting two copies of the Stormwater
Management Permit Application form, supporting documents, drawings and
$225.00 fee for a proposed bank site in Highlands. The 1.04 acre site will be
developed for a branch bank facility which will include, in addition to the
building, parking, driveways, retaining walls, storm drainage structures and
landscaping.
The proposed BMPs will include two Bioretention areas to filter the first flush of
stormwater from the site. Landscaping that is suitable for moist and wet soils
will be installed in each Bioretention area.
a
Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have.
SincereI ,
Philip S. Ward Jr., ASLA
ti
cc. Paul Schmitt - Architect
PHILIP WARD-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
P.O. BOX 2742
CASHIERS, NC 28717
66-86/531 338
03300282//7//61I
DATE ©v ! ,
2 ?,7
DOLLARS 8 ??,??
l Centura Bmk®
Cashiers, NC 28717
??
MEMO
':0 5 3 L008 501:0 3 300 28 2 7 Gil' 0 3 3 8

c?
U
r,
<
c
u
n
n

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
L Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
2Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and
its compliance): . __ , _ --- , _ _ _ _ I .
`3 Mailing Address for
H 1?{-t V?•?v Y`?
2--r4 1
Telephone Number. ( F59E _
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, lettefs, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
5. Location of Facility (street address):
6. Directions to
7
(from nearest major intersection): u 1, HIAY &f / N? KA4_ ( -Zej
I
Longitude: of facility
C) Contact person who can answer questions about the facility:
Name Telephone Number. (?LZJ L?q'? ???
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): New Renewal Modification
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list
the existing perrnit number and its issue date (if known)
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 1 of 4
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
LAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404 Permit
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project.
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total Project Area: 1,2- acres 4. Project Built Upon Area: E %
5. How many drainage basins does the project have? Q
6. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two drainage basins in
the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin provided in the same format as
below.

..<tY'aN. .n:YT.<U c ??.?.' '?:)me??
zn I`nforanat}on < .. ': '/G`?'':'?T..
n:..;4;;?::.:...2.:.:::.,:..:.:»:v .. :.:...::....:.o........ ..:. ..... ...u..:.. r.
i :3< ).? 'x UX Y \ v v?{??..3+. "e'SC
:2iC Zk»,.3X: 1 ' ?' ".iAJtn . .'' '4/.
?.:.,..t.,...:....:. c'. ,a.....:.:::: :.::::.,.:.:. .:...»:....,.......:...:.,..at.
.. a
.??vh:i.' 'tC^kSa: ?? .:i :y%x3,'A?.i?F.:
'':v+':v`•:.,'< ,x ? ?:t> ali i...
L.i.:? •'s. •'?5 ..4 MY: ?..
Receivin Stream Name U -IT,
Receiving Stream Class G
Drainage Basin Area
Existing Im ervious* Area
Pro osed Im ervious*Area
% Im ervious* Area (total)
11

b s, ?.... f .'Lb Tf?J SYv ?Y'..??'3T'•ST ?"

....:... .. ..: ..:..... _:.,:. ,??`.:.,:....:.. ::.. .... ,... :....: ....:?<` 4.:. .
`.nT d$ >
';?3?`??`?3
??":':?•.:v ,. a??',.a:.:.?v. ..:... ..::.,...?»3r...,.?,?„ ';<?'`:»'..i?.w<?,...,?Sx.'..:..o.?:

>,3?E?:?.. c??a.???t7'.'?..?.«, x:x,<c`ox.cwa:w?.f ...:..:s<>
On-site Buildings 654-7 ?2
On-site Streets
On-site Parkin
On-site Sidewalks 2
Other on-site 1,44 e-E
'-
Off-site p
Total: ?= Z E_
* Imvervious area is defined as the ilt uvon area including, but not limited to. buildings, roads. varkin
areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above
IV.
S
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded.
Form SW-101 April 1998 Page 2 of 4
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm): ? ? ? I ,
Mane: •?v -7/(cs?p?
Phone Fax _).
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
This application package will not be accepted by the Division of Water Quality unless all of the applicable
items are included with the submittal.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by signing your initials in the
space provided next to each item.
Ap ant's Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form :StEam
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP (see Attachment A)
• Permit application processing fee (see Attachment A) (N -
• Two copies of plans and specifications including:
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm ?
'
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage basins delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) C I fi??K Bqw=?Qj
certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct, tha the projec will be
constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the deed restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A of this form will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed project ies wi a irements of 15A NCAC 2H.1000.
i6 „1'01
Si?nattme: ? ` Zak:
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 3 of 4
ATTACHMENT A
1. Deed Restriction Language
The following statements must be recorded for all low density projects and for all projects that involve the
subdivision and selling of lots or outparcels:
1. No more than square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the
edge of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures including
asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but not including wood decking or
the surface of swimming pools. This covenant is intended to insure continued compliance with the
stormwater permit issued by the State of North Carolina. The covenant may not be changed or
deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No one may fill in, pipe, or alter any roadside swale except as necessary to provide a minimum
driveway crossing.
NOTE: If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot.
For commercial projects that-have outparcels or future development the following statements must also be
recorded:
3. The connection from the outparcel or future area into the stormwater system must be made into the
forebay such that short-circuiting of the system does not occur.
4. All built-upon area from the outparcel or future development must be directed into the permitted
stormwater control system.
5. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit modification prior to
construction.
For curb outlet systems, the following statement in addition to items 1 and 2 above must be recorded:
6. No one may pipe, fill in or alter any designated 100 foot long grassed swale used to meet the
requirements of NCAC 2H.1008(g).
2. Supplement Forms
The applicable supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project:
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104 Low Density Supplement
Form SWU-105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU-106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU-107 . Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108 Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy Supplement
3. Permit Application Fees (check made payable to NCDENR and submitted to the appropriate Regional
Office)
Type of Permit
Low Density
High Density
Director's Certification
General Permit
New, Modification, or
Late Renewal
$225
$385
$22
$350
$50
Timely Renewal Without
Modification
n/a
$225
n/a
n/a
n/a
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 4 of 4
P hilip Ward "' s"' "
. Landscape Architect, P.A.
CLARB CERTIFIED
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
48 Links Dive- P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717 .
Ph.-828-743-9951 • Fax-828-743.0687 • Cell-828606-8793 • E-rnaik ardi @dnetnet
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
NARRATIVE
REGIONS BANK - HIGHLANDS, NC
A Regions Bank branch office will be constructed on a 1.0 acre site in Highlands, NC at the
southern corner of Spring Street and NC Hwy. 106. The site is flat with scattered trees and
undergrowth. A stream runs through the southern portion of the property and 148' of it will be
piped with a 77" X 52" arch cmp culvert.
The site will consist of a branch bank building, a drive through banking area, parking and
driveways. It will be necessary to fill the site as shown on the attached site plan in order to make it
useable for the planned function.
Two bioretention areas will be installed and will function as the storm water BMPs to filter the
first flush of runoff from the site. During a heavy storm, when the capacity of the bioretention area
is exceeded, a bypass curb inlet and storm drainpipe will carry the over flow. Trees, shrubs and
groundcover plants will be added to the bioretention and will be species that can tolerate moist to
wet soils.
Off-site drainage will be diverted away from the bioretention areas with drainage swales. This will
make them more effective in treating just the storm water from the proposed bank site.
1
,? C,p UP Rp.
by f ,.
;'RAVENEL
SITE SLAKE
Cpl
NC NW't NORSR .
`j HARRIS
10? LAKE
IC-1 C->
Na+ S s
8?9 9
k
VICINITY MAP NORTH
1 "=2000'
?VA IaJh t7MKI.
uic-rH k44 dh q aAV. MAC
40?0
1 u= 2oQO'

171z1 W--A ???1f?rioht? -
161%
21 °tq4 sf
.1 .. 0,0t:1K 11 (044 bN.- oj< <?00

iog Af?k t 2 S
0.90
0. 26
1160?I G
wIIOU17
lofk[..e
?0bt-7 51
15 51 Ib1)1 5(db 4b
471 lli?o V? 1144 ?&V "17 00.
o,o? ,c q,q03 = 49r2 OF 500 ?

.: d>Q L
- = 502

S. VY
rod
101 1 2 lot
i'7,(,,,q4

9,903 ;F

161 {Z loI
gv?o??'t?iorl ??? SYr?i (C)vr
s'OF ld*J t
? G? I Nl.?j ?.{?iD
W1?? -t.r?kl INTO
e? 0F e,-(?-wit7hA 0 I
o?q0 ? S,o,c o,51 ?.
?ztV?

f Q n?
-2-) 7 4F4.,
1/0
00, ???o,aZ4 _ ?.
= 14( o,Q2 - I;2?,
K Sao < o,?1 Ac,:,- 2,2 GFzv
z.Z (0004?
OZZ 11 10,91 u1715i it;,

J
r?
f:

VI
w q:
-
.i =

.i:
/
.I
- to
=' ---- ?!
"' ? a

I i Ed
? Q
W
FJ 14? l ?? I 05

55

?/?,/''_?%?R ••..--_--- `'?Y=,mac"°! ?:5ir;?;- `- ''? j ? <y? ? ? \; \`n ?? ?--?... (gj? 11 ? ` - - i

x. -
- -
- - ------
-----
r
-
a

i l
:

,
_J

r

r

r
V
i
O t
' i.
.r
"
W- lz?l
}
USN
:g
j:
,
Tcj
O O(4
M j?
,
i
I5
iL
,
c.. 7?1 ` vF 1 y ` ac`ii381t1:_sr Q
coo r)O ? o ili: `<:'t?. !ai d?
cow
IL-
??> ? ? ?` _3813 ?_ o
t Y I 1•l ? , ?? "s. ? ao 1
't 3do:
ud ,` 1'i 't • \ 1 ?,, a . 1, ui n. a q S&m
xs'l
oa"
00
ujzz

0
`-
.5Z ? ?
I' a w
W J
w
?aza°
lid
f

6' {
z
N
T?R
?
=

al
00
' .

)

t I

z
s
a
? iF"
M
I J tI I_ a

8
w
a
w
>a
o?

l t:
_ ._ ___ ..„........' I
ID M).J
67
t
- t 1
. .i 1 -
a
t {
el.
i
k _
41 us
i _
t ?'z??.. ?? r ? ? ih ?. ??? ) ?;i, yL1 ? . h Yr+?•? .J ?.. M1<?% ? `v?.•
Y ? ,'i {• 1' n ? ? ? fit: a zQ
?,S&aw--7 g64K
Cu1,v ?f rl.fr::? siZ?
ToT6?1? 3?b? ? AV-.
'c"
GOIMIM??Ib? - 24 A G, 4,Sq
0,30
-fl me- of GoN rt- 'f104 o
l?
H
IzQ2 (z!
:???'• :fib ???y? p,,=
8,cl M l ?j
i5?F 1:0 '54S
Ll Z t7r /

24 ,c 0, Sr = 20-4
01770

6? Z?; = 0,40 / 5eb /.. "7 '2016 1
42v*.- 6'ffk6M?{7 GL1LVfT'( 441f,?&Clly
Q ? 20? ??s VFW V 6'S . (,
b = q,37
' d 4??3 5
7
A?U 6-imf

14 AV,& I ?4Ei;e?
46 Flfl?? SOffL4 #
r
r
r
r
r
i
1
1
4.
3
2
!. S
1.0
.9-
.8 ry
;7-
.6
.s
.4 .4 .4
22'x13' 1.0 1- B [ .6 : .8 1 1 .
.3S
L 18' x l l' .5 .35 ,35
ADDITIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG C. M. PIPE-ARCH CULVERTS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROAOS JAK 1963 WITH INLET CONTROL
Exhibit 13
5,000
16'-T' x 10'-1' 4,000
4 t2)
15'-4•x 9'-3' 3,000 EXAMPLE
4
Size: 36"x 22'.
12'-10'x 8'-4' 2,000 Q w 20 eta 3
zi
Ed tlw +'' mw 3
?•t I I'-5'x 7'-3' o (fast) .
W n 1,000 (1) 1.10 2.0
(2) 1.1s 2, i 2
800 (3) 1.22 2.2
I 9'- G' x 61-5'
i ? 60o a0 in fast 2
M 500
a 8'-2'x 5'-9' 400 •5
300 1.5
7'-0• x 5'- is
00
a_ 72' x 44" eta 100 I.0 I.0
0 •80 /
0 65' x 40' v 60 '9 .9
50
a 58' x 36! w
// .8
40 w .8
/ 0
i
30 rh
4 50'x31' U)
20 .7 .7
w
W W SCALE ENTRANCE ?
!
I N 43' x 2T' D TYPE _
/ 10 W
(2) • Mitered to eentortn a
?j .8 to slops
X36' x 22' 6 (3) Projecting
5 0
.5
4 = .5
29'x 18' To use seete (2) or (3) project
3 horizontally to %eels (I), then
use straight inclined nine through
0 and 0 sects, or reverse as
-.25,116, 2 illustrated.
VI-13
t
.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
I.,, Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project
2. Print Owner/Signing Officiars name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and
its compliance): r, _ R---, ?? , 1 - __ _ _ • _ .
`3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
'T'elephone Number.
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
Flans, specifications, lettefs, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
5. Location of Facility (street address):
UJ?Nt? ? ???1
?C24 P17 may:
6. Directions to facility (from nearest major intersection): r U G
e
? A-OD N?
i?t`? -711
7. Latitu e: Laude: of facility
Contact person who can answer questions about the facility: p,-?Q,
1-742?,
Nam Telephone Number. (LD
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): New Renewal Modification
2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list
the existing permit number and its issue date (if known)
Form SWU-101 April 1998
Page I of 4
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
CAMA Major Sedimentation/Erosion Control
III. PROJECT INFORMATION
404 Permit
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total Project Area: L acres 4. Project Built upon Area:
5. How many drainage basins does the project have? Q I_5
6. Complete the following information for each drainage basin. If there are more than two drainage basins in
the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each basin provided in the same format as
below.
'r.:.:..t::y:sr. x>:x'.z:sracata:^<: ^.cmea
Receivin Stream Name •.?t• est?'w»:w:aa';?o.'ay;;r, .< :.rs::yr'+?
G? ?+'ytr;r.>yKrsyx??a
Receiving Stream Class ?
Drainage Basin Area .71
Existin Im ervious* Area
Pro osed Im eivious*Area
% Im ervious* Area (total) 522 f

:<:..;? y y?? :w. v°i;.?
On-site Buildings ':F31aw: 4:ityv"..` ?.'J^t... ,•1;?'e.. 'N;"t
54-7 ..inQ,?..`?:,y: ..?.. ..? .^? V
On-site Streets 4
On-site Parkin '
On-site Sidewalks 2
Other on-site
Off-site 0
Total: 7,= Z = Ol-70 A6,
E_
" Impervious area is define d as the bluilt upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parkin
areas, sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived?IV. V ES CC'O% 4Z f-S'CACOVV9&A 9'-"' "7' /

9
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all low density projects and all
subdivisions prior to the sale of any lot. Please see Attachment A for the specific items that must be recorded.
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 2 of 4
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the items required by the permit, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons
claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or fumy: ?
FYwne l 1 ?'? WoS a Fax Z
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUnUMENTS
This application package will not be accepted by the Division of Water Quality unless all of the applicable
items are included with the submittal.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by signing your initials in the
space provided next to each item.
A ant's Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form -\_..
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP (see Attachment A) _
• Permit application processing fee (see Attachment A) -
• Two copies of plans and specifications including:
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including: _
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm 7
'
-Legend
- North arrow
Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and curb and gutter F
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage basins delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) C
certify that the information included on this permit application form is correct, tha the projec will be
constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the deed restrictions in accordance with Attachment
A of this form will be recorded with all required permit conditions, and that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed project ies wi 'rements of 15A NCAC ZH .1000.
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 3 of 4
ATTACHMENT A
1. Deed Restriction Language
The following statements must be recorded for all low density projects and for all projects that involve the
subdivision and selling of lots or outparcels:
1. No more than square feet of any lot, including that portion of the right-of-way between the
edge of pavement and the front lot line, shall be covered by impervious structures including
asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but not including wood decking or
the surface of swimming pools. This covenant is intended to insure continued compliance with the
stormwater permit issued by the State of North Carolina. The covenant may not be changed or
deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No one may fill in, pipe, or alter any roadside swale except as necessary to provide a minimum
driveway crossing.
NOTE: If lot sizes vary significantly, the owner/developer must provide an attachment listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built upon area for each lot.
For commercial projects that"have outparcels or future development the following statements must also be
recorded:
3. The connection from the outparcel or future area into the stormwater system must be made into the
forebay such that short-circuiting of the system does not occur.
t
4. All built-upon area from the outparcel or future development must be directed into the permitted
stormwater control system. :.
5. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount will require a permit modification prior to
construction.
For curb outlet systems, the following statement in addition to items 1 and 2 above must be recorded:
6. No one may pipe, fill in or alter any designated 100 foot long grassed swale used to meet the
requirements of NCAC 2H.1008(g)..
2. Supplement Forms
The applicable supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project-
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU-104 Low Density Supplement -
Form SWU-105 Curb Outlet System Supplement
Form SWU-106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU-107. Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108 Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy Supplement
3. Permit Application Fees (check made payable to NCDENR and submitted to the appropriate Regional
Office)
Type of Permit
Low Density
High Density
t
Directors Certification
General Permit
New, Modification, or
Late Renewal
$225
$385
$350
$50
Timely Renewal Without
Modification
n/a
$225
n/a
n/a
n/a
Form SWU-101 April 1998 Page 4 of 4
P h i l i p Ward """"URAN swEly OF LAN
Landscape Architect, P.A.
LAND PLANNING • SITE DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION MAN
CLARB CERTIFIED
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
-FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
48 Links Drive* P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717
Ph -82&743-9951 • Fax-828-743-0687 • CelRM&S06S793 • E-mail-vardi ftnetnet
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
NARRATIVE
REGIONS BANK - HIGHLANDS, NC
A Regions Bank branch office will be constructed on a 1.0 acre site in Highlands, NC at the
southern corner of Spring Street and NC Hwy. 106. The site is flat with scattered trees and
undergrowth. A stream runs through the southern portion of the property and 148' of it will be
piped with a 77" X 52" arch cmp culvert.
The site will consist of a branch bank building, a drive through banking area, parking and
driveways. It will be necessary to fill the site as shown on the attached site plan in order to make it
useable for the planned function.
Two bioretention areas will be installed and will function as the storm water BNTs to filter the
first flush of runoff from the site. During a heavy storm, when the capacity of the bioretention area
is exceeded, a bypass curb inlet and storm drainpipe will carry the over flow. Trees, shrubs and
groundcover plants will be added to the bioretention and will be species that can tolerate moist to
wet soils.
Off-site drainage will be diverted away from the bioretention areas with drainage swales. This will
make them more effective in treating just the storm water from the proposed bank site.
M,4 c? uppR
ti
ro
H/G OF RAVENEL
ENO LAKE
G
t,C• ?.NY NORSR
HARRIS
106 y LAKE
c'>
NW S
?y
y
NORTH
1 *=2000'
?VA IOQh. ?btJK
+41604La?1717 4d#..17. MAP
400
lu= 20G1D?
l01
M4.- A et- ACT _;a
O
,?-f
2.191M sf
0,90
0,26
;; sIZ? W ICI ??Ni? X17
0105? >c 11 (044 = IbSZ

'(o1hl.
0I90
©05
looi7 5P
,; 1551 IbIF
?)15(ob 4bfo
?&4P "P.00
of 0q ,c 91903 = Q
of 5a0 t
502
CIS.
S. vq
`0\
I (P I 124(O

91903 SF
F? 10017 ?v?o??T?NtEPA -
161 Im lo I
?orl ?? ?Y?'?i ?o???
l?
?Cr(`(o? '??F ?IofT?N?atii p???s- ? lT
G? I NI,?'?' ??D
W 1?? adf*rL4-l4 INTO A
q414QZ?=G t,A%
O?°IO 4 So 09 0,51 fib,
nZ7

7?
t0' ,
?ia?-t?t?Tiad # z
C?Z? =Gig
o,-z7l A6,
Z?i

V z 14:;, f
(0 0014?
?-O-fozz-.
? I?

y ro ai _ -_ _ p X - ...... ..._
:r rn
Z ?'j

mm - - - -
::
v
r U' ?
y GLt'
- - - ?
t\
M ?
I Ok
,.•
,If L --- ................. -
00
SSS ?' ?t 1t'xw .F. ?N,' •i?,.£?>! •i fix ? my y? c>c
. ? ?r,G ?` . ? ???\ g}t• ??,?' $'• 6t `;p.Ip1. : 1 KE ??`? - x: ) . r-\ \ O ; ?
rn
:'\ 0•A SETBACK S
AL o ? l ? ? `:ut D ro ` i]jjp : l ?_\' ??`s•i ' :' J 3 \` '• 1
p?r i, l ul ,11:. Z. ; 1 i
gym= c77 \x8 ?'?.
iOj}y[3 ?o `:4`.t
Y C
t ?
q •.
1n 1 ........ _.._ ........... .....__.._ .. --?. d I
0 :-q 17T
EA.
oat
:...
*> tj
_._ t ? ; .... ..,. x•..:'.-? . ----•-'moo . ta,,
.t? i. -
[i t
;ID
iac w? _ 3813 D t- x t){ l 'i
O J 1 3 t i L
O m +l - CR055: , D y to Pte,:' `t \, V
ovae,? s t+I+ \ 1
PO
Y rte} z ?, . o _ :.,3? ,' \ t 't} t
`-Q 'te eo L= y jpAC -= 3o s \ £68£' ! ?( Yzc? \\`
' vex m r:"- O
tt77 m
v ?? gcz'? YN a•_. - -! i au r ?:•
SETBACK' c m m W.
t i I vZrn °w=' t'i•. •.:yl o i i u? \ 'n
t goo 'min +iD to
m F° 1 D
Vc,
(A cp
' p ..A [N i O Z N 1
n y `i. r c.- \e `t l
RAIAP
L o;

WgiR
xrng
?
C
a?
n?
x?
0-1
IM
R m
_J
'VI
r ,. - is 1
%Bic'
N; y1' • L ° .' -.............ter' ? \"`. '\ I; ?/ /' -
IV,
?rt?f , ?':? N?3.?`e-.' ''y ~ _ _ J?;z 1 __ :? ?__`-'__?";Ci,t?-• ?_. ?J•?`?177 /
SI3?
z 7v
.... TT ?ro rn 70 Z --
y z ) z I 1
t.
m rn F' r
Q y
to ' ??'? / ?? ?I' ?? _......?
to
Cu1,v?(
gbNK
Ali

L ?N1? U
24 Ae,?,
,1c It
0126
o,?o
coNcr- f4 10400
r L3 4?Cj 2 7UC3 ?' o??$?
ISO
1 Z? (7Zq>

59 vs
81,9 M??I,
24 ,c o, Or? = 20,4 _
1770
_
-75
75= 'Zol G f'7
CPO
i ?'= Zoe C ? ?+w ???
1?77
7,SW T??M M.&5- 41-7 11
AF644 tooWp
-7-7"-X
Exhibit 13
Q
?mf 1 9vH t,4417*?,
5,000
IV-Tex 10'-1' 4,000
4 (2)
15'-4'x 9'-3' 3,000 EXAMPLE
4 3j-
Size: 36'x 22'. 4
* 12'-10'x 8'-4' 2,000 0¦ 20 eta 3
d
Sd Hw ??' Hw 3
t I I'•5'x D (test) 3
III W 4 1,000 (l) 1.10 2.0 •
cz1 1.18 2.l
2
119 Soo
(3) 1.22 2.2
9'- 6' x 6'-5'
?II T V 600 a0 in fast 2 2
TO a 500
H S'-2' x 5'-9' 400 .5
II 300 LS .1.5
7'-0' x 5'- ("
00
a
a 72` x 44` u? IOU // &+ 1.0 1.0
°- z 80 // x ;9 IA
63' x 40' .9
60
50
58' x 3.6 • 40 uLL_ '8 .8 .9.
a / 0
i
x 30 rh .8
4 50'x 31' 2
V 20 r •T •7
/ HW ENTRANCE z .T-
W SCALE
0 TYPE
U) 43' x 2T' /
.. x
?? (I) Heodsap• p~
I '6 10 (2) Mitered ten w .6
/ farm a
? ? (>f to slope ? .6
Z36'><22' 6 (3) Projecting Q
5 A
4 = .s •5 .5
29' It 18' To use scale (2) or (3) project
3 horizontally to scale (I), than
4184 straight inclined ling through
0 and 0 scales, or reverse as
.25' x 16' 2 illustrated.
22' x 13' 1.0 B -'•? .4 .4 .4
D _
18' x 110 .? . .35 .35 .35
*AOD(TIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE H EADWATER ' DEPTH FOR
LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG C. M, PI PE-ARCH CULVERTS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS JAte• :943 WITH INLET CONTROL
I? VI-13
401 review
Subject: 401 review
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:42:07 -0500
From: Megan Owen <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR, DWQ
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, John Dorney <[e-mail]>,
Todd St John <[e-mail]>
Here are my comments:
Projects without issues:
011504 (DOT, Ashe County) - not in WS
Projects with issues:
011506 (City of Durham, Durham Co) - no WS issues, but Neuse Rules apply
011584 (Philip Rollins, Catawba Co) - no WS issues, but Catawba Rules
apply
011553 (David Mecimore, Alexander Co) - no WS issues, but Catawba Rules
apply
/ 011538 (C. Breck Patterson, Regions Bank, Macon Co.) - Monger Creek is
WS-III, will need to go to local planning department for bua/buffer
review; will need to minimize bua, divert stormwater and use BMPs as
much as possible.
011521 (DOT, Clay Co.) - Town Creek is WS-IV; will need to revegetate
buffer if it gets impacted; DOT must follows their BMPs guidance
document; must minimize bua and divert stormwater.
011540 (Cassidy Residence, Jackson Co) - WS-III, revegetate buffer if
impacted during construction, keep all non water-dependent structures
out of the buffer.
011511 (Dourer Reeves, Beltway Business Park, Mecklenburg Co) - WS-IV and
Catawba Rules apply. County will need to approve bua and buffers.
Development will need to stay out of the buffers.
011492 (Village By the Eno, Durham Co.) - within WS-IV-PA. Durham
Planning Dept. will need to review bua, stormwater, buffers. If streams
truly intermittent WSWP buffers do not apply. Neuse buffer do apply.
011524 (DOT, Macon Co) - Cloer Creek is WS-III Tr. DOT must follow
their BMPs guidance document, minimize bua, and divert stormwater away
from surface waters. Revegetate buffer when construction is done.
Megan Owen <[e-mail]>
Environmental Planner
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1 of 2 11/8/0111:42 AN
v ?\
? ???
??? 1
Y
P h i l i p Ward AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE Al
Landscape Architect, P.A.
LAND PLANNING • SITE DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
CLARE CERTIFIED
THE STANDARD OF QUALITY
'FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
48 Links Drive* P.O. Box 2742 • Cashiers, North Carolina 28717
Ph.-828-743-9951 • Fax-828-743-0687 • CeIF828.506-8793 • E-mail Nardl @dnetnet
01 1538
October 15, 2001
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
`L

;
RE: "Regions Bank"
Highlands, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concem:
On behalf of Regions Bank, I am submitting a Pre-Construction Notification
Application Form along with supporting documents for a proposed bank site in
Highlands. The 1.04 acre site will be developed for a branch bank facility
which will include, in addition to the building, parking, driveways, retaining
walls, storm drainage structures and landscaping.
Site development will require pip' 148' of stream with a 77" X 52" arch cmp
culvert pipe. Piping the stream is necessary in order to o tavrx enou par g
and access for the proposed use. The Town of Highlands setback restrictions
and the streams running through the property have made the site very limited.
A Stormwater Management plan was submitted to the Division of Water Quality
that shows the planned BMPs for controlling runoff and the quality of storm
water.
Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely, PAYMENT
C- RECE
1 VED
Philip S. Ward Jr., ASLA
cc. Paul Schmitt - Architect
John Dorney _ Division of Water Quality
US Fish & Wildlife Service - Asheville Field Office
NCWRC
Triage Check List
Date:
Steve Mitchell Project Name
70: ORRO
AFRO Ken Averitte DWO Project Number
County-MI
?WaRO Deborah Sawyer '
?WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
(]WSRO Jennifer Frye
WARD Mike Parker
OM O Pete Colwell
- - Telephone 919 733-
From.
attached is being forwarded to you nor Y= e'tiOn. Please call if you need
assistance. 5 .
?
keam length impacted
eam determination on USGW topo maps
? Wetland determination and d?ar? ? tzue4 space y?te s
? Minimizationlavoidance issues .
Buffer Rules (Neese, Tar-Parr,100, Leman
Pond fill
[] Ngtigation Ratios
[] Ditching
stream and or wetland ?6?'n s eallabie aa-sd viable?
Are t in
? Check drawings for accuracf
is the application consistent Vt-, 7 ' meetir ? _
Cumulative impact concerns f
comments _
?Y tD., S
Office Use Only: 01 15.3 8 Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit
Section 10 Permit
01 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
-7 Ct
2. Nationwide, Regional-or General Permit Number(s) Requested:__..1
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: N
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: EJ
T, Applicant Information
. 1.
Telephone Number: Fax Number: ?-Z
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has siptU authority for the owner/applicant.)
Company
Mailing A
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
ax Number.
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
Page 3 of 12
M, Project Information
Attach a - vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other-maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
?t C
1. Name of project:...
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): O / _
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0 V
4. Location
County: _
Subdivision name (include phase/lot numb(
Directions to'site (include road numbers, Ia:
Nearest Town:
'etc.):
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note -- If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, a ch a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the exi

8.
9:
7. Property size(
land use or condition of
Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):,,=I-
River Basin: L t'?? 1 ?Li`It ?1' G
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http.//h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
Pa.2e 4 of 12
10.
11.
12.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V.. Future, Project Plans -
Are any additional permit requests 'anticipated for this project in 'the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated. with the project The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts .
N /76q
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) .
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yesiho) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Weiland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's TEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htto://www.femajov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all interinittent and perennial streams
Stream impact
Site Number
(indicate on map).
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
?:?'Stream Name**' Average Width -
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)

* List each impact separately and idealify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as, UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.touozone.com.
www.mayquestcom. etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance m feet) to all streams on site: -?
Paze 6 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map).
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(ate)
Name applicable) Wat)
(if ap Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a and is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): 0 uplands [] stream [] wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g;, livestock watering, irrigation, .aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Paize 7 of 12
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial, viability of the project The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
VM. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may 'be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modif cation of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation'plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any 'application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://` 2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands/strm?gide htnl.
1. Provide a .brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed. j
Pao'- 2 n-F 17
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements: Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httv://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrn/index.htrn. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information.
7 •'
Amount of stream mitigation reque ed (hnear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is. required, call the ..SEPA
coordinator,at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes [] No n
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
i
Yes [] No []
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and atershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts -to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
appl'icant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neese), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman R es and
Water Supply X uffer Requirements), or other (please identifyr,• ?
Yes No ? If you answered "yes", provideowing a on:
fl...... A ...7 1 11
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 (? 3
2 1.5
Total
L.UIIa L CKLMU3 out -u Ieet petpenaIcuwar nom near DanK 02 Wannet; Lone "l =wnas an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. .
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
M. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the., site.
Discuss storinwater controls proposed. in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
XH.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes F] No k
Is this an af ter-the-fact permit pplication?
Yes Noj6k
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or. discharge) of
MV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It. is the applicant`s responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to. allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
.. 0" 1
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid onl;
Date
if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Array Cor ps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
15I Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 20.8...... Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford .
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabanas Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] '.'well Haywood McDowell. Swain
Fax: [phone] G: vba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office A, =nce Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Al:...'_;any Edgecombe Lee ' Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road As U, -- Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville . Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquirn rmss
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
1003 [6/
Pitt •
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
n--- 11 -V 1-1
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
It and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation. Division
160 Zi73icoa Street Pivers Island
Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC •27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan' Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquinians
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
r Westem Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Wataagd
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham. Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
LK-
M?? up R .
ho% ?...,
N/G,S,? pF 'RAVENEL
Np ,"LAKE
SITE
Cpl
HARRIS
10 y LAKE
re1) Z?? BS9
VICINITY MAP NORTH
1"=2000'
PVA IOW-7 VMf(
14164*171-7 qUA-,P. MAC
!"2 2000`

L?N1? U 47F:: ? ?,
?OvIA MgGik? - 24 AG, 0,2?5
f- 5-147 I N116F 0130
3 2 &300
3 0, ??
H (so
G=
t4'C(71Y 0 = !N
z I
24 ,c o, 85 204
S i ?C a,Z,o - 1r2.72
-75

~ V0? V r ??y Y ??
Fom 4 'ARA tmf
100-Z)OI
(fie: •'?' c?? •,, ?•':
•? ron DS

-7t5
QZy = 0.40 /. 5.S )4 7S= 201 G?1-7
Q'f'f?l.A?D GuLVf.?1 G?.?''6?11Y
NO m6q;? ,
41-kl =Coy 5'
me=
N

w
w
w
w
w
w
¦
r
Exhibit 13

5,000
77 4,000
4
15'-4'x 9'-3' 3,000 EXAMPLE

Sits: 3E'x 22'.
2,000 a• 20 CIS
3

a W D (feat)
<!' 11'-5' x T'-3'
(I) 1.10 2.0
L
W 1,000 (2) 1.15 2.1 2
i 800 (3) 1.22 2.2
9'- 6' x 6'-5'
Z v 600 e0 In test
Lo 500
N 8'-2' x 5'-9' 400 5
300
7'- O' x 5'-1'
00

o:
/ r.
1.0
a_ 72' x 44' In - 100
80 /
.9
65' x 40' so +'?

a 58' x 36! ? 8
40
Z U 30
a 50' It 31' N / 7
0.
N 20 w •
W
' / HW SCALE ENTRANCE
D T ?
N 43
x27' YPE _
to
/
(1) Msad?all •
?
.6
10 (2) Mitered to conform G

X 8 to dope 1Y
36' x 22'
93 (3) Projecting
e 6
i 5 0
9 4 W .5

29' x 18' To use scale (2) or (3) project =
3 horizontally to scale (I), than
use straight inclined lino through
D and a scales, or reverse as
.25' it 16' 2 illustrated.
(2)
r 4 3)-

3 4.

3
2
2
1
y
• 1.5

1.0
LO
.9
9
.
.

.8
.7

.6
.6
.5 i .5
.4 .4
220113, 1.0 1-9-1
.8 1
.
18' x 11' .5 .35 .35 35
'ZAOOITIONAL SIZES NOT DIMENSIONED ARE HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
LISTED IN FABRICATOR'S CATALOG C. M. PIPE-ARCH CULVERTS
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROAOS JAN. 1963 _ WITH INLET CONTROL
VI-13
01-1,5-'3 ?K
a
1

a z/8
r fjY
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
May 7, 2002
Mr. David Baker
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Regions Bank Nationwide 404 Permit Application
Culvert, Stream Relocation and Restoration - UT Monger Creek
Jackson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Baker:
Appalachian Environmental Services, on behalf of Regions Bank, is requesting a letter of
concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404
permit from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. I have reviewed information provided by the
applicant and I am familiar with habitat values of the project area. A site visit was made on
November 5, 2001 to further assess the potential to adversely impact fish and wildlife resources.
These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33
U.S.C. 466 et seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
The original application requested 148 feet of arched pipe. The project would have also
impacted what appeared to be some wetland areas along the stream channel. The property also
appears to receive some stormwater runoff from the surrounding area; therefore, the area
provides water quality functions. Although we never made written comments, the NCWRC
expressed concerns about this project and the extent of the impacts to the Division of Water
Quality and the Corps of Engineers.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Regions Bank 2 May 7, 2002
UT Monger Creek, Macon County
The stream, an unnamed tributary to Monger Creek, has good flow and appears to
provide relatively good habitat for an urban stream. The habitat appears to improve downstream
of this property. Monger Creek is classified as WS-III. It is the opinion of biologists with the
NCWRC that the unnamed tributary downstream of this project likely supports trout.
Due to the quality of this stream, it is preferable to further reduce impacts by relocating
additional stream or reducing the parking lot size. However, the current application has reduced
the culvert length to 120 feet. Also, the restoration of the small tributary along NC 107 and
restoration/enhancement of the remaining reach and protection of 30-foot riparian buffers will be
beneficial and help mitigate some of the impacts associated with the culvert and development of
the site.
The NCWRC is concerned about the adverse impacts to trout and other aquatic resources
within this drainage. However, we can concur with the issuance of a 404 permit provided the
following conditions are placed on the subject permit:
1. Stabilizing structures should not block the movement of aquatic life through the
project area.
2. Only clean, sediment-free rock, large woody material, or other bioengineering
techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Root wads should be installed low
enough in the bank so that a significant portion of the root wad is inundated during
normal flows.
3. Require that sufficient funds to complete the entire mitigation activities be placed in an
escrow account before any impacts are made for the development of the site.
Additionally, contracts and easements should be legally executed and mitigation should
be initiated prior to or concurrently with impacts.
4. Under no circumstances should rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the
wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate
vicinity of the culverts and as needed to perform the restoration work.
5. Adequate sedimentation and erosion control measures must be -implemented and
maintained on the project site to avoid impacts to downstream aquatic resources.
Erosion control matting should be used for disturbed areas on streambanks in
conjunction with appropriate seeding instead of straw mulch.
6. Restoration and relocation work should be conducted in a dry work area to the
greatest extent practicable. Sandbags or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to minimize excavation in flowing water.
7. Disturbance in stream and within the 25-foot buffer is prohibited from October 15-
April 15 to protect the egg and fry stages of trout
. h. ?
Regions Bank 3 May 7, 2002
UT Monger Creek, Macon County
8. The overflow outlets from the stormwater ponds should be installed in a manner to
minimize scouring of the streambed and banks and energy at energy should be
dissipated prior to discharge.
9. All mechanized equipment operated in or near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials.
10. Native trees and woody shrubs (e.g., willows, alders, sycamores, dogwoods, oaks and
red maple) and herbaceous plants should be planted along the streambank to
reestablish the riparian zone and to provide long-term bank stability. The species
shown on the planting diagram are acceptable; however, we request the addition of 1-
2 hard mast producing species Lhat have the potential to reach the canopy layer. A
native riparian buffer should be reestablished along the tributary on the west side of the
property beginning at the existing culvert outlet.
11. Vegetation planted within the riparian buffers should be protected from damage by
animals and people to the extent necessary to insure successful stabilization of
streambanks by native trees and shrubs.
12. Post-project activities or modifications that would impact adversely the established
riparian buffer or other stabilization structures are not authorized.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Pending
availability of field staff, the NCWRC may inspect the work site during or after construction. If
there are any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Owen F. Anderson
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
cc: Mr. Mickey. B. Henson, Appalachian Environmental Services, Consultant
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Mr. Mike Parker, Division of Water Quality, Asheville
mm ?
?y
x ,yy{
°¢ s
2x ?
?tpp? a
2i?Q 3
?I
go
6 fly
= Z
A
N ?
n
Q Q
o
NSmz
>
?
CZ
QQ
m0 N O
ci? > y m Y V A 2 C A
F
m
xpN?°m
ma^;
mr?. rN.1
7 i - s? zo Ey m
m$m R sv k F y
o
m"kx 7A? i
1 OF
m mP
? io
1/1 ? y -
m
?
m >;
!??
?K C I
9
a
O ? m

uz
° r
li1

v
my ) M.SSL 2S

i`nav,

0 - ?m
" x
s z y
i
m? ?' 91 U 91 01 3-u y 0 ?•n? Cf
\
S_

SE
i d ti ? i 10.
n
Vp -
v /1
t 8.0
q
Z
X90
I ??ef yp Is 1 IJ /2 m
?e 9 ? ? ?y ?t^
Aza O
Qi o 0 ro yu ? 3 1 z
°3-i 9
4?
iiiinnnn ?? • C 6
5
N
Q+3? N
E

S,
?s x
C7
ci
A
r
Ls7
a
a OYs
90L 'AMH
zme m
m
?p z
?s opy
8==
s?
i Zm??1 H iEy A
r OP O
n ° 2m z
pcac m m
A 2?•1 ;V ->1? C
m a> oa ?
N z? ox 22 s
p -00' m O N s <
C 4 ?I
sm
m i= 1 ? ms
Az M
tN0 N >V Nv
> ?s
p N ul S N
Z 't
zo e
m m
0 ?
a m
N N
n
N
a O A
5 N

? y
. D N
Ott
Z s
g ? $
g
m N

mwa

9
>
m
g
23
n

4??
egc
?? V
>
m
N N
e
?
N ?
p
<

yl N

1120 m
NDZ N
?F°> z
ozaz °_
N
Q
Q
1392'
mod
2
D
? D
.L O
c: =1
zm
IN
:91
FF
?BMC
T
A u2
canoe d
I ? O

L
z
N
C ? V
n ?

E. "n El ? (V
c1
DATE: OCTOBER 15. 2001 REGIONS BANK
JOB: 0114]
N
? =r
REVISIONS SITE PLAN TOWN OF HIGHLANDS
?
N'+ MACON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIN*

_ Jg13 3? ? - 2? .°
I 0 ?z ?a C>1CD?
m 1 L S SN 9 L L ya mrz0
cl > 6 mA?°
AN9 7N a>z?i
N - < p N
t a m `? ]4 C?D
;F
u a
1? I
a ` .
t o - a•
992
y ; K K
?I m V ? v
N 9 tI all TZO 1.SS y'>$ r
L u 02 rxC, ; VY I3- CROSS '4
s SLOPE
mCU?° ma z `. ?• 8
a3- - li K-i
$? V <-F) '
H?m cc ? .? ???A 1 ° dap *° 41+ CLK
JE lift z
E uA
75.
SMACK. z o$
It i°
? ® L8£ ??. ro$
? $ ® .. \•o it
c, 1q < ® E
M
f.-RAt1P q o
_ Fi mM
m 0
w I ? J
Rzm - ?
? ? i FA °? ?w .?
? S Z
Zin ?91 ?

8zo

n°vo ?_-
?j
za
NV
M

N
m
u
zo y
?
o
m ?
°

m
z
x

c?

6

PREPARED BY.
PHILIP WARD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.A.
P.O. BOX 2742, CA90M NORTH CAROLMA 28717 (828-743-9951. EXT.208)
W W Z
> J O
Z W F-- U Z
Z
C.7 W J
z W EL CL
> to U U O
Q z Z Z W w 0 X ZZ
F- W F- -j Z -j
QJ °-t- WwWO°'
-c? w
Wwa"cnow UU?UC7
c??? =O(D - Wcn W ZZwZZCncncn
U)
e c c OO Q Z U U) J W w , J J J
Z nZQQQ
=. O ?E--)°ccnu-www 0 j_
w
:> LL
'Z/'?// 2/ /O/ (0 0 O LL LL O Q w w w
Z W U W CL 0- U IJ- W CL non
O _ N K) LC)
N K') ? 117 JJ i- CO U -
d w
N W
-J V
a -
z m
o w R
N
U U) 0-
C114
CD
o Z O
c6 F-
U N VF1
of = F-,
z Z 4 F o ? U ?' z
lid j u Q' O (?
p p
J r-?
Z U
Q ? O a
(v^ i
W
m
a?
w
U
fy z °
W
Z w (n r 00 ?,? o p O E-
z
UV) Z04 r?> ?W
?? c H ?,
Q ¢ U c? ' ••'f,- W U
F- F-? a00N0 v t U
w U) < 'n00!E p
-?
< C14 a C/)
r Cox v ?M a.5rf-; i-
LL. 0-
z
Z 3 Q F-
LLI
Z Z
O
U

W03'1N3WNOMIAN3NVIHOVIVddV -MMM
£7£01£9'9ZS :XV-4
£L61'989'8Z8
6LL8Z •:)'N VAIAS
13381S NIVW 1S3M £IL
S3MIANAS IViN3WNONIAN3
NVIHDVIVddd
VNIlObV0 HIMON 'SONVIHJIH
NNVG SNOI JD?l SN°ISIV
NMOHS SV :31
ZOOZ'ZZ'833 GI
NOIIVZII19V1S V NOI1VOI11YV WV381S ZZZOZO:'ON 8
t y..
r'?V1Yr 4
T

`
JJJJJJ? ?
I ((ff
J ?
i

1 1?
r
c
z
{? ?ft
- - ?,
fl Lu
LLJ:
LLJ.
?• ? iY
H
W
w N
V)
rn
a
v
rn

n w
W
L?
W
J
Q
V
Vl

O
v
O
J

? W
Q
V
t?
.o
0

Y w
F

J r
r _ _ ,.
f '
.3
,r
r
,w
V /
W
Z
V ?N
£7£0'1£9'828 :XV 4
£L61'989'SZS
6LL8Z 'O'N VAIJS
13381S NIVW 1S3M £IL
S30IA83S IViN3WN0dIAN3
NVIHOVIVddd
VNI-IOUVO H18ON 'SONVIHJIH
Z00Z'9Z'833 M 31 A N VI d
N N d 8 S N 01 J 3 NMOHS: SV ?3lV0S SN°IS'A38 J N I 1 S I X:
300Z'61'933 :31VC
NOI1VZIl19V1S V N011VOWN WV381S ZZ30ZO :'ON 8Of
H
LLJ
W I?7
(n
0
0
0
.r F-
W
W
LL
W
Q
N U
N
U_
2
Q
O
O
N
N Z
W
£7£O'i£9'8Z8 XOd VNI108VO H180N 'SONVIHJIH
WVJ 11?9nINOlI1n?n?nJ? r?aa. rnr.u.. ?9V11111,711o, I
£L61'989'8Z8 1 I S ~
6LL8Z 'O'N 'VAIAS H C? w ?-
133211S NIVW 1S3M £IL N V SNO I ? :SNOISIA38 S30IA83S -I'd1N3WN081AN3 N8 3?J NMOHS SV :3Ivos lo?rodd
ZOOZ'LZ'833 31VO
N` IH3VIVddd NOIIVZIIIE3VIS V N011VOUIW WV38lS ZZZOZO :'ON eor
Woo* iN3WN0d1AN3NV 1Hwwddv
£7£0' 1£9'828 :yV=1
£L61'989'9Z9
61LOZ 'O'N `VA-11.S
133dlS NIVW 1S3M £IL
S30IA83S -Id1N3WN081AN3
NVIHDV-lVddV
VNMI JVO H16ON `SOMd1HOIH
? M Sd :31'd
` G SNO 1 J3?? NMOHS :SNOISIA
ZOOZ,9Z'83d :31
N011dZ1118tl1S V NOLVO111W MMIS MOM :'ON 8
?z
Ls
v~i a
N
W -?
O%
d
O
a
.o )?i
N
old
M31A NVId
d3SOdOdd
W
_
cn
\?\ N O
s
Z
V Z
W
Mo
3811
h
4
3813--l
10
a ss0 1S
tJ1
?Z
t
?r
I?
1 dp .p ?
a
O 'O
EXISTING WEj2 I E
?o S
Z o
a
44i
N -
k
/
o O
41-
Q N M
all z
(- O
O ? t
W O /
d W ( V f
O if l l
CK
M O
Z_
U Z
W
n.
M 0

D ?I
I
z
W
C7

J I
LU
I W
Z
z

(D
J z
a
m =

C7
w

a

z W
O
0_ Z
= Q O X
F m I- w
0
W
w
LLI
LL1
J
tq a
U
(n
U_
S
IL
Q
I'
U
0

N z
W

W03'1N3WN0MIAN3NVIH3VIVddV'MMM
£7£0'1£9'9Z8 ?XVd
£L61'989'8Z8
6LLOZ ':'N VAIAS
133HIS NIVW 1S3M £IL
S30IA83S -1VIN3WN081AN3
NVIH3VIVcJdV
G
c
A
C
VNI'108VO H1NON 'SONVIOIH
F-
?N`d8 SNO I J??I SNOISIA3N SN01103S-SSO3 _ ?
NMOHS SV :31VOS 7-
ZOOZ'61'83d :31V(l
NOIIVZII18V1S 78 NOUVOUTA AV381S :'ON 80f
I`
0
co

K) %0
0
co

K) Lo
0
co

t+') -1
0
00

to M
0
co

to N
0
co

tr) O
C) C
0
co

to 0%
Ok

te) 00

n
to n
O?

n
K7 10
0%

n
V-)

N
+
Cl

i

4 N_
+
O

It ?

< 1
? C

O
O
O
_

r?
f\
0
CO
t? .o
0
co
t? U,)
0
CO
M :f
0
co
to tr)
Co
CO
to N
0
CO
K7 O
co O
6
CO
W) 0,
0%
? co
o,
n
rn r
o,
f\
K) ?p
0•
t\
t?
C>
P?
z
0
U
W
U)
C/)
0
w
u
N
O
N
+
C
C
C
L
O
00
M)
O
00
N7 K')
O
00
K) N
O
00
W) O
00 O
O
00
K7 0`
0?
r,
K) w
O+
r-
K7 n
O`
r-
W) ?p
0,
r-,
K7 LA
U
r-
K) 't
0+
r,
to

N
O

I
i

r-

x /

N_
+
O

W

9
i

r l
? I

1
1 a' O
O
1 O
_

.0
0
00
K)
U-)
0
CO
K7

0
co
to
K)
0
CO
t)
N
0
CO
W3
C

co
co
c
0
?
to
O?
O?
t\
t?
a0
Oll
n
to
Ir
0%
[
to
'0
O?
t\
K?
U-)
0%
n
to O

z
0
U
W
00?
U
C?

X
W
0
I --
w
w
LL
w
u
In
U
?n 2
IL
Q
0
WOO *IN3WNOSIAN3NV IHOVI VddV -MMM
£7£0'1£9'8Z8 :)(V-A
£L61'989'828
6LL8Z 'J'N VAIAS
133H1S NIVW 1S3M £IL
S30IAa3S IVINAWNOWAN3
NVIHOVIVddd

f 1
?
I
I
?
? i
r

,
c

r

I c
t

I
i

i

i?

I

i

I /
1 /

,
rn n L0 M
LID O o O O
;-o 0 co co 00
M K) K) Po tr) t+)
VNIIOHVO H18ON 'SONVIHJIH
N N`d 8 S N 01 9 3 8
SNO
1V
NMOHS:SV :3Id
300319Z"833 :31
NOIIVZII18V1S V NOUV9111W M381S" ZZZOZO :'ON 8
ST11AMAd
W [\
(n
JNIlSIXD
O
+

F
I
D
V
n
0
0
Co
0
0
0
0.0
o cl%
t\
co
V
U-
.? W
J
Q J "
J Z
Q
:D M
U- LL
71
Z O
Q Q-
m O
?.
? v
?- J
m m
I-
£7£0'1£9 M =XV3
£161'989'9Z8
6LLOZ 'O'N VAIAS
133N1S NIVW 1S3M £1L
S301AN3S -lVIN3WNONIAN3
NVIHOVIVdd`d
N
J
O
O
d
V:
C
C
CL
J
0
O
a
VNI108VO H1NON 'SONVIHDIH
ZOOZ '8Z '8
Nd8 SN01 J3 :SNOISV
NMOHS SV ?3IV
Z00Z'61'83d :31
NOIIVZII18V1S V NOIIVJIIIYV RV38IS ZZZOZO :'ON 8
.- I
M
Lo
t
z
O_
H
Q
N
M3 1A NV-ld
0
0
N
O
H =
W
W p
U- -
O_
N ---I
J
n ?
2 LL
U ?
Q Z
wa
ry m
U- w
O w
T-
2 ?
CD O
Z N
W Z
J Q
J =
Q
1y
L1J
F-
Q
W
C7
i
i
O
Z
W
O
J I
I zz
m
w LL.
R: LL O
Y
Q z a_
Q O
f- CO t-
N
1
00
N ?
W
W
U-
w
J
U
U
U_
IL
Q
lY
C7
O
ZI
1-
W
W 00
2
(n
z
W
N
£7£0'1£9'8Z9 :XVd
£L61'999'8ZB
6LL8Z 'O'N VAIAS
1319US NIVW 1S3M £IL
S301A83S IVIN3WN081AN3
NVIHDd-l` cJc]V
N
O
N
+
O
O
0
0
VNIIOaVO H1a0N 'SoNVIH0IH
SNOl133S-SSO?JO W
)IN`d8 SN0I 938 sNO1s1n3a
NMOHS SV :31VOS N??????
? _
ZOOZ'61'83d :31VO J
NOIiVZIl18V1S V NOIlVOI11N1 WV38iS ZZZOZO :'ON so
-1
00
00
K7 t)
00
00
to N
co
OD
M ;-o
00 O
a0
00
t? O?
I-,
co
to 00
n
00
to n
r-
00
to %0
r?
co
te) Lf)
h
co
t4) ?l
r
co
to Ko

00
to

N
+
O

N_
O

C?
W
J

I.J

0
Cl
0

00
0p
t+o K)
00
CO
t? N
00
CO
tro
co
!f0 O
00
00
to 0%
n
00
to 00
r--
CO
to n
1,-
00
Ko %0
n
00
to Lo
I,-
CO
K) -1'
n
00
Ko K)
I`
00
Ko
N
+
O
LC)
O
z
0
F-
U
W
Cn
I
Cn
Cn
0
w
u
N
+
O
C
c
4
c
-
O
co O
co
a0
Ko 0%
I?
00
Ko co
n
00
t? n
I?
00
to 10
t`
00
to ?
I\
00
t? -1'
I\
00
!? K)
I\
w N
r-
O
Ko Fz
00
t•) O
I\
00
if)

N
+
O

N
+
O

Q

0
O
O

co

? O
co
a0
tro O,
n
a0
t? 00
I\
aD
to I`
r-
00
t+o 'D
t\
aD
Ko U-)
I\
aD
t+7 -1
r-
ao
tfo Ko
t`
aD
t+7 N
n
ao
t?
co

? O
I\
00
t?
Ko -
Lo
Z
0
U
W
Cn
I
U)
w
0
(if
U
0
w
w
w
w
J
N
AV
'n 2
CL
Q
O
W03'1NRWN0UTANANVIHJV IVddV mmm
£7£01£9'M :XVd VNIIO21V0 H1210N S(INVIHJIH
£L6I'989'M S:I-l IAO&A ~
6LLSZ *:)'N VAIAS U
w
1332f1S NIVW 1SAM £IL :::::.::.-.;;•:::::::, :SNOISIA38 ]J ?J = ?-
y///?// .. :ii€:: i:: •::! , N N d 8 S N 0 I J 8? NMOHS SV :3IVOS (n
O N U a
S301A2l?S ld1N?WN0211AN3 Z002'83'833 :31V0
N`d I H Dd-ldd dd //!/!//f ON / N011 VZ I118b1S V NOI1VJIl INI NIV 32115 ZZZOZO :'ON 80f

i

/ /

i

i
i

i
i?

1
0
N
D
D
f
V
D
C)
t
0
0
O
LC)
t
O
O
O
+
I
I 1
I I
I I
I ,
I I
i I I
I I
? I I
I ?
i
LL-
LL W
QD LU J
Q J
? Z
J?a
?:D m
L.L
U-
0
<^ Q o...
m O
F-
LL J
M M
F-
0% I\ LC) t+) U 1- LC) Ko O
co co OO co 00 n n n r-
OD co co 00 co OD co co co
to M to pr) to to to to to
WO3'1N3WNOalAN3NV IHO VIVddV'MMM
£7£0'I£9'8Z8 :XV-A VN11021V0 H18ON 'SONVIHOIH
£L61'989'8Z8 ' f
6LL8Z':)'N'VAIAS NV-I(J -10?J1N00 w
1332l1S NIVW 1S3M £IL :::::•:::• ::: SNOISIA321 =
l ? ? Wimm? NNd 8 S N 0 I J ? ? NMOHS SV A3lVOS N O I S O?I ?
S30IA83S IVIN3WN06IAN3 ZOOZ'8Z'93A :31Va
11,11NOI1VZIl18V1S V NO11VJIlIYV RV381S ZZZOZO :'ON 90f
W
W
W
N
Q
O_
ui W
U
Z
W p z y x z
O Z p J W~ O W

u m
10-
W
W= .4 p Q
y x
~
O y W G Q m !- y y N
Z Z >
F- Q
y x ?
LL U' O
CL -j
>> Q° -? F 0
fA m
p
of ?- m O Z Q Z H W m Q O W
0 x
X
O W F
p Q x p E x F-

Z
F W N
J
U Z I-- V1 W Q p W y E
Z W
E p m
J W U E U ° W Q N m° N H
3 x
F Q
W Q g
W Wy J J p ca
W y m J
J_ y
L W C F x
F E Y Q O Gd
p 1- p m
Q m
d LL F O Q Q y d N 0 y ~
O
x m IL W LC
Q O y Z W= p
2 Z
Q W E H Y 50
0001
-W W U
W W W 0 0 2
1
Q 3 f y Q Q
y a N W W J U Q Q N Z Q

0
= U

'L
O U °

J Z
W

= 3
Z U Q W

W

.
W
m ?-. ^
j
d Q J O
1i Q p w r d H H
IA
Z W J gm! Yay W y

O x Q F F J

a. W Q
m
W° 0
m
W (~A f-
J J
Z y
Q E N W -, C C O
O Q ~
y

0 Q
O _
3 O N f d
Q Z G Q p U U x
y 6.
0
p F d° E U Ii Q W LL! F O 1-
X Z
IW y d y K U d° Z Q
J
Q W r F j y Z
E
W J O m y Q F-
O O y N
N
y Z p
y d J
Q W P y y W
f Co W 0 F- ° x w p
y W Z
0
=
O W O Q m W.O y W p Q F O LC V Q
~ W
L) x y
W U O Q
UA x Z p 0> m
I.-
~ Z LC
Z U F
m y }
~ 0 f
a
y y W
W Q Q F
Q W
y CL

0
X 0 E x Q
W Y U Z
Z S x O W U F' W
". m Z U-
O O
o
o Q aQO 0?zG'wQW QQ V p
?
?
V QW O ©33 ®c°am~a0c ©L ©w
6
O
EXISTING EWE6
f
4
C-O D?2 I
O
I
I
o ?
f
1
1i
r
A
r
Q
} N
`N
oC
iu
i
i
0
W J_
M
0a
C
H
0N
W
h
S
S
OD ?

it 0
N N P:
a
a
2 W O
O
_ N H
O
a
O
w
n
_
CO LO
c?
?Z
?z
M 0
?U W
)
w c Z _
?Z
W
?o
0
C/) (L
x?
O_ n
o_
w =
O
LL
W
EA
---
San
;t,
/SF 60
o;o
410-
?
e
cp
3813 _/
I
O
M
W
N O
= j <
L
O c
LL 1-C
W 3
Y
s
O
M ?
W
W
LL.
W
J
U
N
U_
CL
Q
tY
0
0

N
W
W0O'1N3 WNOMIAN3NdIH?dlddd V'MMM
£7£0'I£9 M :XVd
VNI108VO H18ON 'SONVlH91H
£L61'98S'9Z8
6LLSZ '0'N VA-US
Z003'61 H02lVW
NV aJ
`-l ?
W

133a1S NIVW 1S3M £IL
::::.... ::.: ::..... .:.... :.........
%//??///// /?N

?y

Nb' 8 SNOIOD?J
SNOISIA3a

SV :3lVOS
NMOHS
?d
N I1Nd LLJ
S3?IA2i3S ?`d1N?WN0aI?N? yi z
ya i / / ZOOZ'8Z'833 =31V0
NVIHDd-l`dddd 1/ //%?//11.;.y17// NOIlVZIl18V1S V NOUVOWN WV381S ZZ30Z0 :'ON 80f
0
0
0
- o
O N M
N O
- O N \
M M O \
M
M
\ N \?
M N
M \ M
O \ \
\ N M
N N
• N
? M M
O M
h
EXISTING
WER i E N
- - i c
M A S
P - At z
/ L J M
N - M O V7
N
I
1 M
N_ _
n
u
r -
o,
? - u
u7 f M /?
n ? N 1
M
L0
n
10 L 1 M
??
10 M 10 In
L\l
10
o
O I
10 M M
N Q
3 N N
10 J M .M.. M
`O
N
O
O
N O
O_
N O
O N O
O
?l \ N?
N
O \ \ O JO fffyyy
N
0
O
f„ O
00
CIO S W
O
? Z
U Z
W
M Q
Z
Q
J
H
3
- 1,'
s ? ? ? Q 3813 ?,
? M
O ' M ^ N = OQ
J lj °D
10
10 CD O
,o J Ns\Z
M O co
I Q
M ?,r
? tXiJ
N
N - ? u7 •• an
10 Q \ '2 J \
O /
1 ? I
/t
?I
O
cez
D z
U W
CL
L

Z
NN
W
}
m
a 0
>
0 LLJ -j
J
LL
= N J Q J J
Z m a
a m ? <

U
m
IZ
E Z
= N O
U C7 N 0
? O O W Q
0 d w u
Q N N

cr-
IY
} U"1
0 m
00 LU LU
cn 3 w W J
m O 12 N. W
0 = = Z
F- ?C 0 !- E
cn of OU
mN?) - 4Lt)
O
W
w
w
w
J
a
v
U_
Q
LU
Lo
0
R w m
LU LU 0
J cn 3: LU
Q
w
= a m U) z
O Z F-
0 Z5 IX Q w
U) > LU
\O 1- 00
£7£0'1£9'838 :XVd
£L61'98S'9Z8
UM ':)'N VAIAS
133HIS NIVW 1S3M £IL
SAOIAb3S IViN3WNONIAN:l
N` IHOV Idddd
w
°
u
O
m
` s W
o Q
LL a-
v
VNI108VO H18ON 'SONVIHOIH
N N` E] S N 019 ?38 NMOHS-SN°'S'A
SV :3Id
ZOOZ'61'833 :31
NOIIVZ1119VIS V N0I1V9111W HV381S ZZZOZO :'ON 8
W
m
p W r
D
O F- J J
LL Q
N W
' O Y p
U
tY Q Q O
W J W W p
W
W
o
F- °
0OW
z m > a.
w
of-
3 H
F- _-

w

m W LL
Z ID
`
2 W
m

W
W W LL F-
0= p > LL
°

N? ° a
N W F- -?
m Q D N W
?
O7
p Z O
x
-J ui O

?

? w
m N
L
(x o
cn 5 U 2
W Z 00
W 0NLLiVj N
N
O
O0 X
O O'U?Q
J (D
Li ZD 0XQp
F-0 X
ox_ ao:u--

W W
Z f A M >
x
F-W 0D
ox0ao
Z F- LL U F-
Q
Q
v
N
O
O
3
a
0
U
Q
E
Y
J
m
2
N
N
W
w Z
w
> Q
C ?
? W
S-Idl?ld
SnoDNVTlD3SIW
p
W

a

z
W
U
z
0
U
LL
O
c?
a
W U
0' F--
Q W
Z Uj
J J
N
p J
3 LU W
W > N
j V W W

? ° m (n
v
o w ¢
" W
F- Z
O
Z J
ao
? N
w p U
N
V
J K
p
= F?
m
u a
w
p
O
} Z LL m
z O U) N

W
X
LL z
E
W
U) Y
W
K
a 'taa m u Z
v
r a> E > u
W

fn xaF
W V O a
V a
2 L
F- 0
^ ? O
W
U
z
W
L
F-
J
N
W
W
Cf)
uj
J
Q
U
U)
O
Z

0!
O
x
U
Z
Q
\ \ Ce
y ?
N
in >
Fw
a ?
w ?
?i a =
N
v
C?
y o?
a Om
\ yJ
1 1
W
U
a ?
?w
?z -
Y F
V n
W
Z'o
N
Z
O
_
F-
Q Z
U
O Q
J
N U U
W LL

Y IL -
U
w N w
x W cn
U

a

F- F-

U
a o
W L
-
z Q
1
-
Z
w J
<
in cr- U)
W W
F- Z
U U F- J

~ F-
a Z

? U
)
Z J
a
x
0 O U

Z U
i
U
Z
Q m w
w F- F- X:
Z
z to
a
x oo
U N Z
J Y ?
N
W ( F-- - 7
-
Z
U
O U)

Z
U x
p U
AX Z W
!? 0
00
x
. U) U
Z
i QQ
£7£0.1£9'9Z8 :XV4
£L61'989'838
6LL9Z *TN VAIAS
193NIS NIVW 1S3M £IL
STAA83S IVIN3WNONIAN3
NV I HOVIV88d
VNI108VO H18ON `A1NnoO NOOVYV
NN`d8 SN019816
NOI1VZ1118V1S V NO11VOUM WV381S

O Z

O N
Z

°
z
Qc2n
U) 1= Y
oZ
w Zm
0
?
U U
aF- J O° LLJZ
W Z J z C- a
O
w0 Q W O
><n cn
0
c
n
0 _jw Q

Z o
LL- Lu n
F-
I I-I I ?I I I? I I-1 I W ° J a ? w o=
I -I I X I =11 ?1 y
?Ii?lll?l? l =3 U- a z
o 1,, 2 0 J
a
I III
?I
I?II = -U ° Z Q w
I
?
°
o
a - Z
NF=.w 0
O - °?
NZ w
s o
? I al
°° ?
F -i N
D °z w w a
°N 2a

° °° °° IIC Its
O 00 000 I?, 1(;

0
a
f
1
1
Z

Z
J a
W
°
<

(„)
w

F-
a F- F-

Z

Z

Z
cccoccc0 0
occcoccc
I
1--1
1I? I1
??????
°
?I I I-1
sha 0 a 00 '
2 o
w a w
J _1
LL1 Of J
CL

Z O
0
o coo 0000
It?ll- x
Nom?
w
0
Y 000 000 III
I w in > J
m 000000 coo It^
I 0 z w W Q F- J
w 000160000 J a
U U J
W W m

N II

I
000°O00
° N

=
JF-
w
2
z

W
w

F_ a
°> 0

0 m
O
w
a oo m7j i ?a Ow Q!
= I o a 0
F- N
U) Z W
> ?'
w O tL
N 0 0
W

I

D

)
m

a W w

F w a

O
D
w
a F-
°Z? W X
z Z -
OZ d
Ucn F
?J W > W LL.
Q Sa LLa 0
°
? 0' F- m
i Z Q W
Z N W N
LL. O 3 U W' w
a F-
m
w
i i mz? w o a
r,4 oQuj cn?

`?
z
Q z
F- a 0 Z P: w
U W ° J
W ; Q

?
0 Z °
O Q
J
N N
F
-N In cNnQ O L? O
LL C/)
NCY
(D 0 Z W a-
°
U
' U Zw W
m a ZOZW J
ZU-
li- c
??
F- N
W ° ?aa
Um z
a
D w
m a- o
U N Q
Z
Z w 3
Z a 37
>i

w
0 0:
(Dwa- J
rL c~nw
z
WU-J
Qw-1 n-
O
wwCL
O_za CL 00w
a Ea z
w cn>tw
:D W M QF-- w
Jcnm N
at
d. N W
C) U) LL
Z?FSU-Z
a- aw
U W U W
U
< CL OJ J_ Q
2 N L L Jw
D
= Q
C7 Z F-
Z3:t W oJ
U O 0 LL
~ a t9
C7
Z
U
a
o!
C-D:i
NMOHS SV 4
ZOOZ'61.833 =:
ZZZOZO :'ON
C9
Z
F-
Z
a
J
a-
0
Z
a
0
Z_
FL
a
2
cn
z
z
a
m
\o R1

i
S-11vi3c]
sno?]Nd-1-»3SIW
W mj
z w
cr OMu
02F w
N ?3 N
w?
CL
N O
O w
rw
U W ?
z0
aWN
00 a
Q
W
J Q
a W
t- ~
F-
C
N
LLJ
CI-
O
Sw?
w
2 J
F J_
z?
Z
V) 0
LLJ
>
Of <
Z
U w
O ~
to O
D ?
w Z
M ?
WOz
F- Z N
O J
z.=Q
W ?-
W
In
W
J
U
r?
F-
C)
z
C- -
W03'1N3WNONIAN3NVIHUV IVddV mmm
£17£0'1£9'8Z8 :)(V4
-? £L61'985'8Z8
6LL8Z 'XN VAIAS
133HIS NIVW 1SAM £IL
S3OIA83S IViN3WNOHIAN3
' N`dlH?d?'ddd`d
z

s
rn
U
F
J
a
z "a
y Y
m V
N =
i
i
rr
wW
J X
Co
LU m
? U
W r
a
f j
J
a
z I
O
H
N a -?/?-
Z
O
U
w ...
J ?
a Q tl
U d
z
Q O_
- J F-
a U
w
o:
O
0
O
J
IL
101
W
d'
°
F-
n W J
F
d O
\ of 0
rw
d M E
Ewa
H Z
ILI r
a
m W
J
LL
m <
NN x
C
}
F-
W
N
O
2
j N
? J t9
a
co
a°
w z
a
~ N
U7
VNI108VO H18ON SONtlIH`JIH
S7/d130

w
Lf-)
?fNV ?f
//HLJ?] SNOI?L?-9 NMOHS Sd 3 S-*.977tI13NoS J' / / Y V ? J ?+nO-9NV77-9JS/YV 1_f w
=
Cl)
ZOOZ'61'83d 31 t/0
NOI1VZIl18V1S V NOUVOLLIN M381S ZZZOZO :'ON 90/'
fY
w
a
J
W
J x
m H O
? z <
a?
a-
?a= i
LU x ?
U))a ZU_
N W O
U, J
a
co
°
Z
a
a
w
U)
Z CL W U
W ?f- 0a=F-mo w
w -1 ZOQ i ZF-U) 0
?0W LL- W m X: <LWL,i?QN to
m Q U Q w w m Z LU p p
= W = _ _ CL V > - = N
F-W=F-?w?N=Qp~ J
LLJ ?mF-zcnW-w- ;>QWm
W Q Q N
3: 0
W 0LOL nmFZLUU)J Fa--
Z F- 0 cn z gy p w
= m o
OWp W Z O w 3
p w Z Q w
N W ?LLj cncn p
??? x: N°a- Z~Za- J
?wW QOF- LUU) O QN W W ?
Hw LL- - U) (D=Zw02 N
ZLL.LmzYIR UpQ?1-o
O O p O 0 U J W Q a = p Z
F- O V
a z p Z} M O_~ Q I~-
MwF-Zn;wZ>az3:
O m w= Q p Q p ?F-ZOC/) p E
cn (p ?w Z w-
LU(LoQww?L? ?F=-Y<??
°w p W O H OU O
awaWUQMccnpZp -`L)wwc) 3: L) =QIL? W NAM LL-<0 Cn W
F-J (n m>F- >> W F-CL
cn a. - Q -I F U) Q p cn cn :3 Z)
F-cnCLU) U)UUW Ocn
= W= W J U N W 1 O W O
F-Ln F--O N ?mcnNMF-
Q W
WCnp OQp
j°} F-=MZO
U C Y- LIJ
O F- C9 U)
QO<=W ?0QNZ -iM0
Cy - > O to F-
=wUZ JQZ=QQF-NU
O Q o= OU W U O p=
N-- WW F- W W U M Z U} F-
Z ZSOI'=ZOWOZ}
?QQ0 F- F-ZF- OUmF-Qm
p
w
F-
cy-
Q w

Z O W Q
O LL
N C-
_
F- _
LU
m LL N
O S2
W J 3: p
U) Tj w W J W }

M a
O
?°
Zo
-
w az
U
o
U) CL
CL
CL w Q }

?
F- 0 r a.
° m ?

CL M =)
Cy-
Q
a
X: w F-O
WZ j
U
F-
i- w a
cy- U a.
X:
-
O O W
U)
F-
J
J W
N Z Z
W
=W
37
m
U- ?
Q a ? W
O -
co °O 1
-
OZ J
N Z _ Q.
W
N
O
2
N
?_ .a..{ O
Z D N J N
.
o as a a
W
co m
W ?iNf1m? Q in Ill Z
W- it
N F-m
? N
° VO
J
W
z
re F- ui
U a
Q N
? d O F
S
>. En LLJ
Qv°EF_ Ww p W
a0 m(Y
O G a? U a a (L M Q
F W a w m w W m
w z ItU iU
F' W ? F-- z a. N
0- a OU J
_ J
0- (L
_
J
J
w

x V ? z
Z
mma
U
/ O
W
>
O Z

?.W.
fY a-
° CL
}

\-jF-
J
D
W
Y
Z
a
m
2" X g" " ~ . 2" X 8'
FACE OF CURB CAP BOARD 6 X 6 6 -0 O.C. MAX. CAP BOARD _ ...PAST ~ ~
A ^ ~
PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS - -IN CONCRETE--CURB. ~ N~ ~ ~ _O
" 1 X 8 TRIM i i f 1" X 8' TRIM TRIM A U ~ Q - lD
PROVIDE 1/2' EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS 6 BOARD - - ~ - e - - BOARD ..NOT TO EXCEED 50', AT THE -ENDS AND MID-POINT, 1'_p" 6" X 6" W
OF RETURNS AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. POST - I /1 V" ~ H z ~ _ tD
ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1' X 6' VERTICAL BOARDS
S" 1 ° RAOIUS ~iIGAL -$OARDS _ _ - - - - - - BOARDS ~ ~ ~ ~ ,N G, Q U1
I ~ A ~
1.1 /2" -RADIUS 5'-O" _ - - - _ - _ - - A w ~ ~
- 2' X 6" STRINGERS 2" X 6' STRINGERS-BACK ! - ATTACH TO POSTS WITH DA ~A - LINGERS-BACK SIDE OF FENCE o ~ d P S TH DADO J V. ANGLES NEEDED AT CORNERS ~ ry N 0 TS WI ED OINTS. (GAL ) ~ q i+-
Q / r~~ • M ~ x S ~ ~ = w
- ~ 1 X 4 TRIM FINISHED GRADE - - \ ~ d ° -BOARD RADE ~ P-ROP-0SED ~.LAN7INGS ~ ~
6" , , - e ~ U ~ x ~ SEE SHEET C6 -LANDSCAPE PLAN _ A ~ ~ d
a - a- ~ 4 ~ - ~ I
' 4" CLEARANCE ° a , ti -4• _ Q ~ A ~ Z ~
- - _ ~ 4 ~l 1NLfT ~EFLfCT~t: (3' WIDE) ~ F-+ FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER ~,1J a ~
,~l _ _ _ - - - - - _ -PROPOSED BOULDER A TO DIVt~tT STORM aNAT~2aNTO ~
_ _ = CABC a POST ANCHOR: (TYPICAL) 1' X 4" TRIM 3000 PSI CONC. - - USP TIMBER CONNECTORS BOARD ~ ~ Q ~ RETAINING WALL ~ ~ BIORETENTION BASIN. ~
-CURB~c~GUTiEft - f- 3'-U" t1Ef111Y~OL-UMN-BASE SEE ~ Of Q ~ ~ O ( ) n ~
~ l I I I I- 3000 PSI CBE66 12 GAUGE ~ , ~ ~ , -FTG. SLOPE TOP OF FTG. FOR DRAINAGE U~ JNAGE ~ ~J O
1 , - TYPICAL ~ " s t -6 - o. ~ _ 1 MAXIMUM PONDED WATER PROPOSED GRADE Q ¢ Q ~Q
T;OMRAGTEO PROPOSED GRADE DEPTH - ~ ~ (LI
SUBGRADE OUTSIDE FACE OF ENCLOSURE -ELEVATION Zo W 3:1 MAX. CURB OPENING ~ _ lD L~
- ASPHALT f'VMNT. Q a ~ p U I
N IL
(GRA~NAG: TO@IAP,QS CURB) 1'-6w 2" X 4" TRIM BOARD O ~
~ RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF " PLYWOOD) ~ z _ Cb . 6• MAV 1 - IV1. / r N LL e.}
SCALE: 1 =1-0 SECTION VIEW ii ~ w V IIII~IIII~iII _ ~ . a _ ~ ~
3/4' RL'I~hraOD Q - I-I ~I ~ ~ 11111 N ~ m
FACE OF CURB BACKING 2' " -4' CAP " Ili il~ III ill II II III III~II III ill ~ w
1 X6 ® ~ II~II~ VIII a
VERTICAL BOARDS oa.~ X III Ill II WAN Q
PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS 6° 6' X 6' POST - - - - - - - - - - - - 2' X 4' TRIM BOARD ~ I III ~ J X
IN CONCRETE CURB. - - - - -RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF PLYWOOD) 1'-0" Q _ o ~ 1111 -III ~ I 1 ~ m - - 4 MI . _ •
PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS VIII III III ~ o
NOT TO EXCEED 50', A71'HE ENDS AND MID-POINT PLAN VIEW AT GATE ~ CAS' OF RETURNS' AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. 1' X 8' TRIM BOARD d~a o III II1 II®I - - PLANnrlc SOIL ~
-5' l".RADIUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT _Jll Ill _ sff - ~,DSC,~E ALAN
I 2" X 4' CAP 10'-6' O.C. III III II I FOR BIORETEN11oN AREA SPEaFlCAT1oNS
1 1 /2" RADIUS 2" X 4` SAP _ X 6" " w _ II VIII
- VERTICAL BOARDS 1 X 8 TRIM BOARD 4 -6' x 6" POST III~~'._. II • - ~ ~ _ :..~t'-0` MIN... ~ SAND BED
E° i ~-I L~.~ I~- 6 x B POST ill .
1' X 8° TRIM BOARD o ~ Q III ~ ~ ~ ' II II - II~III®I ~ IIII~III~III® I~IIII III~I III
j , ~ ~ ~ T-HINGE (3 E -T--HINGE (3 EACH SIDE) II III®III III I III®III®III IIII~III®III II
7" - 4 - n ~ t° X 6' VERTICAL b D ~ ~ n BOARDS 1" X 6" DIAGNOL r r X 6 DIAGNOL BRACE
4• a 1' X 8" TRIM BOARD BEYOND 4 -0 BIORETENTION AREA
° 1 X 8" TRIM B01 ' X 8" TRIM BOARD
CABC 3000 PSI CONC. , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,--I- 3/4" PLYWOOD
CURB -~C-giiiER - I p ~ ~ I I 1 -BACKING 1 6
~ ~ FlNI! u _ it FlNISHED GRADE I---
1" X 4" TRIM BOARD H ? H
CD~AC~-0 HASP 1ATCH 1' X 4' TRIM BOARD NOT TO SCALE A
SUBGRADE
SECTION VIEW AT GATE CANE BOLT 1" X 8' TRIM BOARD 3' WIDE INLET DEFLECTOR: 3' WIDE INLET OffifCTt)R~ ( ) ( )
- DRAINAGE AWAY FROM CURB) ~ 8 -0 FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER
TO .DIVERT .STORM WATT INTO TO DIVERT STORM WATER 1NT0 BIORETENTION BASIN. BIORETENTION BASIN. I-
SCALE: 1„=1'-O" ELEVATION AT GATE OUTSIDE FACE cc~NC. CURB & GUTTER ~ a ETCH eASI~ ~
e" ~
1/2° EXPANSION JOINTS FlLLED WITH 3'-0' 4'-0' 4-O' -O' H H BACK OF t~1R8
PREMOULDED JOINT MATERIAL do JOINT SEALER CURB do GUTTER PAINTED SOLID WHITE »
1'-0 30' ~
U A
- -3000-PSI-C-0NC. ~'AD ~NITIi Si1FF-$ROOM flNISH. -NOTE -0N FENCING: ~ ~ OflflOflfl I ~ 000000 N
ALL SCREWS NAILS AND OTHER FASTENERS SHALL BE HOT DIPPED fi" -TRICK 3000 fSl ~'ONC.~AU -GAL~JANIZEfl fOR -EXTERIOR -USE. > so'
- 4 3-
- , - _ T;'-X T;" -14.0 _X -W4.0 -WWF ALL WOOD SHALL .BE PRESSURE TREATED SOUTHERN YELLOW P1NE - a ~ OF GUTTER ~ FACE OF
i - ~ ~ 2'-4" ~ :rri STAlDARD ~'?B ~t
Q
d ~ ~ ~ -Q- - - - ~ ~ CURVE -Y - ~ ~R~ - ~ ~ q,"~ TRANSITION AT CURB INLET
• ~ INDICATE 0 INDICATED ON PLAN ~
- a
- 0 8' CABC _
» FRAIrE~ GRAZE ~ HOOD BY
a - 1- - - scA~-E: a - ~'-0" - /2 1-0 - F~SFI GRADE 1NOAl1 23-C6O OR APPROVED EQUAL ~ ~
=I COMPACTED SUBGRADE 111- ASPHALT
III- II-III-
- -I 1 I-I...~~~ - lOP GRADE I- - - - ELEM. AS NODED -I I -
SCALE: 3 4 -1-0 I- - I
-NOS:
SCALE: 1"=1'-O" PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS FlLLED WITH I _ PRECAST OONCRFIE soot ' NI1H LOrOpfOUT PANELS
- - -PRBdOU~-JOINT'-1AAiERtAi--dc dOlNi-SfAL-fR- 20 --OTC.-MAC(. --AS SHOWN ON PLAN) AS WINE. BY 11NDALL OR APPROVED EQUAL
PROVIDE I/2" DEEP SCORE JOINTS AT 5' O.C. WITH ROUNDED EDGES AS SHOWN ON PLAN.
4" THICK CONCRETE WALK WITH STIFF BROOM FlNISH
6" SCH. 40 PVC DRAIN UNE WALKWAY SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS STANDARDS AND AND 2" SMOOTH TROWELED BORDERS.
' FINISHED GRADE SPECIFlCATIONS. CONCRETE CATCH BASIN (2 SQUARE) BROOM FlNISH SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR ~ To TRAFFlC FLOW.
~All7k1-CAST-IRON GRATE
.FOR ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW _ _ _ _
-1=111=1 - - -III l~l Il=l l I=l 6 X 6 - W2.9 X W29 wwF CENTERED - ~ ' COMPACTED
i~ I I1=III=1I I=1 - - 3000 PSI CONCRETE =111= - I I IN WALK THICKNESS. . _ I
6" SCH 4O PVC - ~ - it - III
ROOF DRAIN 1JNE _ _ _ _ ~ I 1f4"~'FT CROSS SLOPE 1~2"~'~ - 000000000000 - - 000000000000000000000000 - ~
-I III - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-III=_ _ ~ 1 a CONC. CURB do GUTTER - - - _ -III- i I I-
COMPACTED =III=III=I I I~ I ~I I I=III=~ ~ f I I - - ~ ~ _ ~ - T -SU$GRADE-UNDER-CATCH..-BASIN - - - - - I-~_- I_I - -I a i a _ _ - ~,~~uunuv, NUMI~t;
II. ~ ~ III a o - a a n a ~ ~ COMPACDED SUB6RADE ~~0 I ~ ~ / ^ \r fNAArr'nrrhrr~~ iii
la- I - - - - - 9 ; ~.b ~da.y ;
~'NI5 iI - a I - - - - - _ _ _ - Q ' D ~ ~ cMOr - r r
- - - i f= I - - - npAWING - - ,III a I = ' = 502 ~
15 I ~ iL _ _ i1==
- ~T i I I 1 4" WASHED STONE p~Ol~~l?~Y O~ _ - COMPACTED SUBGRADE BASE sTOHE ~,r 03-0~-2002 ASHED '.,~~..~r~ 0~.
1- ---II - - I ''%p S wP~~~` NOT TO SCALE i,,,~~iii
- , ! 1-1- I=ll ; ,l 11-111-11 11111 ~'"i~,
_r CONCRETE WALK DETAIL
ANn Nor ro r usn MIRIFI 14ON FILTER FABRIC - 7 WASHED STONE AIL ~J ~ sir~nMwNGs
0- : mpl:Onucr, COMPLETELY-TNRAP.-DRY SUMP , DRY SUMP 2 SQUARE X 3 DEEP. WITHOUT H15 W~Ir1FN
SCALE: 1"=l'-O"
pF_ I-1M15510N i~ ~ TAI l- ~

INVERT ~
3796,6 ~
QQ
PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES: ~ ~ (1.1 ~ . i- O
~ Mi ER v - `0 ~ Pp Q ~ Rp. ~ W U ~\Cpk ~ _ d'
PIPE FOR STORM SEWERS SHALL BE CLASS 3 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) '..STREAM :BUFF-ER EASEMENT: - ERWISE -NDT1=D. ...PROPOSED ..30 ACCORDING TO ASTM C76, AASHTO -11170. 'UNLESS 0TH ~
SEE SHEET C4 fOR EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 30 FROM TOP OF S AM CHANNEL y H Z I ~ ~ ~ z
_ ~~(,y~C-~qs~. - - -P-IP-E -BEDDING SI#ALL -0E ASS "C" {-0RDINARY) EXCEPT-UNDER ~P-AVING-WHICH _ DETAILS bN BOTH -SIDES -Of THE STREAK. SHALL BE CLASS B . ~ U ~
y Ul rah OF Q ~
ALL WORK, MATERIALS, AND PROCEDURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RERUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN ~ HIGHLANDS OR THE NCDOT WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ENO ~ RAVENEL U ~ I
KE W „ lL ~ 00 ~ ~ D
D SPOT ELEVATIONS AT CURB dt GUTTER ARE BASE OF CURB, TRENCHES SHALL NOT REMAIN OPEN DURING RAIN PERIODS. WHEN RAIN IS EXPECTED, PROPOSE __TRENCHES -8E •CL~E-0; ~OVERE-0,-aR--0IHERNA.SE-P-RE#~EJVTE-0 F-ROM cp`~ o d sE F- ry N ~ C. N~ FOR Rp• - ~ W
IS 0:5' HIGHffZ. CAUSING EROSION & SILTATION. TOP OF C{iRB S~ N x S ~
J HARRIS = w F- ~ 1p6 2 LAKE ~ ~
THE PROPOSED STREAM CULVERT (ARCH CMP) SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING A DRY WEATHER PERIOD WHEN NO RAIN IS EXPECTED DURING THE INSTALLATION PERIOD. r n V ~ I- X p' ` ~ H w s ~~s ~ d
-i4 GEUTECHNICAI.-ENGINEER-~S'IJACL~INSPECT-'THE-AREA-AND-PROVIDE SPECIFlCATIONS
FOR PROPER UNDERCUTTING AND BEDDING. 2 G Q ~ ~ - ~ ~ Z ~
EI~VTiON #2 (SEE DETAIL #8 SHEET C3) k ~ ~ H ~ ~ W N
Bt#TTOM ftEV.=3809.E tit b1g~ ~ Z Q ~
MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-600 SF U ~
Q H ~o MCINITY YAP NORTH ~ ~ N
Un ~ 0o W O
t °=2000' ~ " ~ _ I PROPOSED STREAM Q Q a ~D
PROP. 18" RCP :32' -LONG -~tT-2.-896. . RELOCATION ~ W N
(Q25=2.9 CPS) 2g~ zo 3~ + ~ 2 `D In
~ -PROP: 18 RCP + Q a O v I t J N
32' LONG AT 2.0~ ~ W
{t~Y5=3:8 {:FS) + + LEGEND ~ ? (t1 + +,~ti ~ ~z _ 00
PROPOSED + ++o~ ~
-ROOK liE'fAJNING WALL (MACHINE STACKED) ' + + + + + DUSTING CONTOUR (2 INTERVAL) w W
BIORE~I~(~N ~~1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~j~1 rnrn ~ ~ V'
(SEE DETAIL ~ SHEET C3) ROOF DRAIN OU AT + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE ~ W ~
POTTOM ~V:=3811:1 _ _ CATCH 8 SEE DETAI ~ t + ( + + YINIMUY SURFACE AREA-900 SF SHT. INV. + + + + L \ ~ ~
+ + + + + + + + + + + w+ + ~ ~ ~ ~ a „ X + + t + + ~ + t t pl- + ~ w - N 0
+ + + + + + + + + + _ ~J
t:URB INLET + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +p + + + +a~+ + a-o ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ + o- • EXISTING TREES m 0o w 0 w=
_ _ RIM ELEV.=3811.55 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ ± ~ _ _ ± + + ~ ' + N + o ZEE ~ o ~ + + + + + + + + + P n.
-Eif1/.-3805,8 ~ + + + + + + + + + + g~+ ~ZR ~ ~ a _
+ + FLOC ~ + + + + + + + + + + TOf .OF Fll.L .SLOPE ~ . + ~ ` ~ + + + + + + + + + + + 2a ABANDONED) + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- + + + + + + + ~
a + + f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
~ + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING
IRON ~ .PJN. _ . ON- + I
DIVERSION + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + P + + + ~ + + +
-EXJSTiNG iRffS SWALE ~ ~ o _ _ _ + + _ -CUIQB -tt1Lf# + +
ALL BE-SAVED {HAND - - + ~ it4M V~ .J~5 + .'~5 + + • + + PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION AREA + + + + + ~ ~ ~~W
P _ JNVF = 1g~ i- ~P + + + + , + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + +
_ _ - _T _ _ + + + + 10. ~ ~ ~
HOUSE ACK + + + y + + + + + ~ ~ ~Ld !1 ~ ~ 1 N + ~ J
tia~ ~ ERG ~ _ ~ - + + + + + ~ + s~ 2
~ 3s®s o PROPOSED BIORETENTION ~ ~ ~ Q1
- W tia~
/ + + + ~1 ~ - _ _ ' ~ ....-10.D..~...~..~..1D:o~.~.~.~.'.'... ~ ~ i- a' '.I.~........... 11.2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS H ?
--#'ROPOSE~ -Ct#LVE#~T. _ v.. - - _ .........'.':....~;r~ ' ~ q q ~ 4 Y~.. '.~..1 ~ .:.:.~;...:.:.'.'.'...ppENIN6 3813 = H
120 OF 73 X 55 , 12 GA. ARCH CMP - _ ~:-~•N.ia~.'.'.Jd:P::.~:~ z......... - - - ~zsfi,. .-......i- - ~X'I --CORR.,~'YPE ~2, A~:I~INt~ED~FROM- _ . ..'.'.'.~.-i......... 3_~~ A ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~.~.~.'A~'.INLET.~D~FkECf. S.'. • • PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
ti ..................i............... r.6................................. ~...........o~.~..13.5.......... . WILLCO (ASHEVILLE, NC) OR EQUAL E.::.",..,... ~':.':.~.'.':.~.~..~svc.)v?.. NG 24' LV. ?
A~ 1:0 ~ SLOPE. . ~ ~...'i... N ~8.......~.• _ ~o--a SILT FENCE F--
HVAC . ~{-W25 = X09 -CPS) - g~ - . . . HVAC - - INVERT Q 11.0 INVE 3808,3
(,0 ~ ........~'.'.'.'.'.x'.~.. . ~
- ROOF BRAIN OUTLET AT I y; : _ _ CATCH 9ASIN ~4 DRIVE THROUGH TEMPORARY STONE CHECK DAM I
' • (SEE DETAIL ~ SHT. C2. INV. ELEV.=3807.5. 11L #b4 I 11.2 EXISTING SAN. ~~•5 SEWER LINE ~ FABRIC CATCH BASIN PROTECTION
I 'IT:2 .~.~.11:6' L1 H
TW=13.5 : 15.0 ~ - H
..ROCK RETAINJNG WALL • PROPOSED • .......................CURB.'&~.GU.TTER. b PIPE OUTLET STONE APRON .TYPICAL'.'.~.'.~.......-..-.~.'.-..'.-.~.~.'.- ~ I I..LI
MACHINE STACKED ~ " " " ' " ' ~ ~ " ~ " ' ' ~ ~ " " " ~ ' ~ ~ • • • • • ~ • • ~ 3 CURB OPENING ( ) . , ~ ~ ~T-1NL~:e>~cTORS ~AAIK ~t~LDING
~ ~ • . q~:.:::... ~ F.F. ELEV. = 3815.0 a - - S EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE & MANHOLE U A a
1:E:=3806:0. ~ .x . 4 . . ~ EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE AND POLE
-TW=13.5. . . . . - .8 S(~i 40 PVC ~ ROOF DRAIN UNES TW=13.0 PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
pad ' ' (TYP..) o~
- b - _ DOWNSPOUT LOCATION A. I ) ' . . . ASPH . '7.-PVMNi:.'....'.-.-....:.:..... . / , _ - . _ . _ PROPOSED 6' SCH. 40 PVC ROOF DRAIN LINES A.. • / .AT10N .
CURB do GUTTER , r - :.':.".1#,Q' r, Q DOWNSPOUT LOCATION
-wPlcAt ~1 12.4.'..-F.OR: RAI / ~ Q ROOF DRAIN LINE CLEANOUT
14.4 CONC. SPLASH '..........'.13.6..'..' BLOCK --PROPOSED . ALT'.RViMIT: ....r_...:.: . . ti2
I ...:...:....'EXISTING' ...'::.".'.1'3.5' ICE , / •
REMOVAL lti ~ _ ~ {LENGTH=14b'j . ~ _ . _ - - - - - SIiAl1~' -514VED P
EXISTING 30 CULVERT ~
DRAMJA(;E SWAGE . Y • • ~ S11NG TREES . - / ~ OWNER/DEVELOPER.

'.'.1.4:0...... .'.'.'..'.....13:6... ' ' ...1.4,0 • a w ~ ~ ~ P / ~ REGIONS BANK
P 111 GREEN STREET, SE
. . . 8 ~P DIVER~N a'. i . / swA / GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA 30501
IRON , . / NAIL 770-503-2000
. • \ s
PROPOSED RELOCATED . /
UTILITY POLE ~ ~ ~ ' '...'s.~.....'...... .
T.B.M. - - • ' ~ ~ . • • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
TOP OF MANHOLE ' ~ ~ yt
- - 6 spaces - :ftEV.=3813:55. /
- 2' WIDE CONC. GUTTER DRAINAGEWAY. i ' - ~d~ L /
.PROPOSED ' -
RELOCATE EXISTING SPRING TROT CURB & GUTTER OVERHEAD PO /
~iTjUTY POLE {SEE ~DEfAiI. ~2, SHT. C2) UNES _
-E~IST~NG ~AVf~IENT
SHALL BE REMOVED ~g~
5 g~ 8~ INVEST STABiL1ZED CONSTRUCTION Lti bt a~ ~g~ ti2 b c~
38108 ENTRY /EXIT
fiVD -CURB & 'GUTTER AT POINT OF CURVE
-TANGENCEY
o.o c.~,ti ~v
~ -
~~S a- 502 ~
npAWING ~ ~ ~
~S -BASE -INF-0RI~IATION /A 'w.. •
p~~p~p1'Y D~ GRAPHIC SCALE s P,,~` 03-0~-2002 CALL ULOCO
- TklISSITE PL-AN~NAS~PRl~ARARHI-BASE1] ON TOPIIGRAPHIC~NF{1RM~11iON PROVIDED=BY PAUL -SGHMITT.ARCHIlECTURAI DESIGN STUDIO. iGGING ~ PRIOR TO D _ 5 ,
-rl~~ aprlai~r~~r -
PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING ROAD EDGES, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND OVERHEAD POWER LOCATIONS, CULVERT AND STREAM ALIGNMENTS WERE _
ANn NOf TO M USA TAKEN 1RDM A PLAT -WTLT:D 'REGIONS 11NANgAL CORPORATION" BY sYtvESTER .l COMPANY; "PA:; DRAWING N0.4234, DATED JUNE 4, 2001 1-800-632-4949 ~,ir~~O~ IN
AND REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2002. Of? fpf;OnUCrt~ FBCf 5 PAWIN ( )
WTHOUT H15 WIZIM I inch = 20 ft
pF_ P:N115510N

d'
OWNER DEVELOPER: ~ ~ ~
BOULDER RETAINING WALL LEGEND o
(SEE SHEET C1) U _ REGIONS BANK Q ~
BIOREII=NTION PLANTING ARRANGEMENT SHOULD w U~
' EXISTING -TREES BE FIELD ADJUSII=D AS NECESSARY BASED ON To BE sAyED BUILT CONDITIONS .AND DIREC110N BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. -NS 111 GREEN STREET, SE H - ~ Z I GAINESVII.LE, .GEORGIA .30501 \ z
U ~ 770-503-2000 ~ ~ , (U
E- Q ~ • ~ L()
1-8N SEE DETAIL ~8, SHT. C3 TYPICAL BIORETENTION SECTION 4-IG, 6 O.C. EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED ~ I
~ ~4-IG, 6 O.C. 3-IV, E 3-IV 8' -0.C. ~P W ~ W ~ ? o0
~ 3-CS 8' O.C. 1-O,QP~ _ - 90-DC - X ~
CAP, 8 O.C. 90 I w s 1-ACS = w F-
•
_ - X _ 1-HV 200 DC i ~ ~ _ U ~ X 1 HV 60-DC ~ S ~ d
• ~ - ~ ~ / \ I X M vj , L~
2-NS \ / \ PROPOSED LARGE SHADE TREES Q ~ z _I_i
~ 20 O.C. ~ ~ X \ ~ X _ W a l~
~ .X X i > X 1 CAP ~ z x X ~ Q ~D
\ U ~
X x / Q H ~o 1-BN ~ N
• • X 1-CAP X N W o X ~ PROPOSED SMALL TREES
X ~ ~ _ I • ~ Q
~ Q a tD ~ ~ z ~
~ ~ : X • ~ Zo W • v ~ _ ~Oln
~ ~ Q a I- ~ ~ o I
3-vo i X X ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED SHRUBS ~ N 00
8 O.C. 1-CAP ~ ~ L` = o ? N
1-ACS ~ ID z _ 00 - ~ ~ ,
GRASS EDGE 1 FP SOD DRAINAGEWAYS GROUNDCOVER ~ W
SOD DRAINAGEWAYS AT CURB OPENINGS Q W ~ ~0 N ~
AT CURB OPENINGS 3-IV, 8' O.C. ~ W ~
4-IG, 6' O.C. + + } ~ + t m cV
+ + STREAM BUFFER AREA o ~ ~ X
BIORETENTION PLANTING PLAN PROPOSED 30' STREAM BUFFER EASEMENT: MENT: + + w - N 0 ~ _I x pq
THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 30' FROM TOP OF STI SOP OF STREAM CHANNEL Q - m w = _
„ ON 60TH SIDES OF THE STREAM. SCALE: 1 =10 + + ~ ~ o ?
+ + + + ' PROPOSED BIORETENTION ~
+ + + + +
BIORETEN110N AREA SPECIFICAl1ONS: BIORETENIION 2 + + + + + + + ~ 12 + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SEE ENLARGED PLAN ~U + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SOIL TION ~ ABOVE. BIORETEN ~ f PROPOSED GRASS AREA
,r + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
PLANTING SOIL SHAL A MINIMUM OF 4' DEEP SEE ENLARGED PLAN L BE ~ + + + + + + + + + a~ + + + + + + + + + + +
ON A 1' THICK SAND T3ED. PLACE IN MAXIMUM 18" LIFTS ~O~' ~ AND LIGHTLY COMPACT. BOULDER RETAINING + + + ++++++++++++~y++++++~ ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + -iG~ + + + + + + + + + +
WALL (SfE SHT. C1) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + cp + + + + + + + + + +
SOIL COMPOSITION SHALL HAVE 10-25~ CLAY AND SHALL BE EXISTING TREES „ T T - + + + + + + OF A SANDY LOAM OR LOAMY SAND TEXTURE. THE SOIL SHALL TO BE SAVED + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +~2+ + + + + + + +
BE CLEAN AND -FREE OF HARMFULI SUBSTANCES TO PLANT GROWTH. _ - _ _ - _ _ _ ~ ± ± _ + + t' + + + + PROPOSED MULCH EDGE
+
THE SOIL SHALL BE TESTED AND MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + pH RANGE - 5.5-6.5 + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + + + + +
g0 ALLAY ( ~ + + + + + ORGANIC MATTER - i.5-3.0% ~~lOf + + ++Ut~Q0P~1+ + + + + + ++++++++4+++++ W + + + + + + + t • + + + + + + + + ~ + + E3HSTHd SAN. ~
MAGNESIUM (Mg) - 35 LBS/ACRE ~~OF f + PHOSPHORUS (P205 - 100 LBS/ACRE ~~SnN + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + EWE uNE SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS: ?
POTASSIUM K20 - -85 LBS ACRE IRON ~~Fj~ +6 . ± + ~-r-+-ice + + + + + + + ( ) / PIN + + + + + + + + + + + + + +~n + + + + ~ H
SOLUBLE SALTS -NOT TO EXCEED 500 PPM ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PIQI \ SEED MIX: HARD FESCU 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ E 25 LB./AC. A
PROPOSED + + + + + + + + + + +S~ + + PERFORM SUITABLE SOIL TESTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE . + + + + + + S•(~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + m CREEPING RED FESCUE 40 LB./AC. + t t t t t+ D + + + + + + + + + ~ CHEIMNGS FESCUE 10 LB./AC.
DIVISTON OF-WATER QUALITY FOR BIORETENTION AREAS) DUMPSTER _ _ _ _ _ ENCLOSED BY FENCE ~ ~ ~ f ± ±
5 FM / + + + + + + • + + + + + + MULCH i-CV • + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + RYE GRAIN 25 LB./AC. + + + NE MILLET 10 LB./AC. (SPRING -SUMMER ONLY) Q
+ + + + + + + + + 1-INS \ ~ + + 1 + + + + + SEEDING DATES: AUGUST 25 -SEPTEMBER 15, OR MARCH 15 -APRIL 15
A 2"-3" MULCH LAYER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON TOP OF THE PLANTING SOIL. + + + + + + + + + + + + + THE MULCH SHALL INCLUDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD THAT IS SUITABLY AGED + + + + + + 1_~ + + + + + + + + + + ~ t~~ 1-KL (YEARLY VARIATIONS IN SEEDING DATES MAY VARY DUE TO EXISTING WEATHER PATTERNS.) I-
EXISTING ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + AND FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL AND PLANT MATERIAL. A WELL AGED HOUSE • + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ Z~ -HPT ~ ~ \ Z + + + + . , 1-QA SOIL AMENDMENTS: APPLY LJME AND FETILIZER ACCORDING TO SOIL TESTS OR APPLY I-
MULCH IS DEFINED -AS MULCH THAT HAS BEEN STOCKPILED OR STORED + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ 1 TON DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE PER ACRE 200 LB. 18-46-0 PER ACRE
FOR AT LEAST 12 MONTHS. • + + + + + + + + + • + + + O 100 LB. 10-10-10 PER ACRE. + : .
PLANT MATERIAL i t . + f~+• •t ~ : + • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • ~ • • ~ MULCH: HYDROSEED WITH CELLULOSE MULCH AND ADD NETTING ON STEEP SLOPES.
2-IMBP ~ . _ _ ......................S=SBA'..~.~.~.~.~.':.~.'.'.'.'.~:3-~M.'.':. ~ U
to - .ALL PLANT MATERIALS .ARE TO CONFORM 70.STANDARDS SET FORTH BY • • . J . r . THE AMERICAN ASSOCIAl10N OF NURSERYMEN AND INSTALLED IN A ....~.....~.~.~.'.'.1~~.V6... .....-FP..'.... • . ~ • • . A
..........~.'.~.•.'.':.~.~.~.~.~:.~.'.':.'.'.•.'.'.'.'.•:.~.~.~.~.~..'.GRASS.'hRGE.~.'.'.'.•.'.'.'.'.•.•. WORKMAN LIKE MANNER USING ACCEPTED- NURSERY PRACTICES ANO • • ~ • • • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • ~ ~ ' • ~ " ERGS ..................:..........3-PJ. ~ . , . . ULV.
STANDARDS. ~1~Vp.~.~.~.~.~.'..'.. . BOULDER RETAINING • , EXISTING 24
WALL SEE SHT. C1 . ' ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH THE' SAME RELATION TO FINISHED ~..'3.=IGS::.'.;~~F:!' • ® • ° • • ~ • - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ' - - - - - - CALL ULOCO
GRADE AS THEY BORE TO EXISTING GRADE AT THE NURSERY. ' ' • • ' • ' ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ' • • • • . ' • ~ PRIOR TO DIGGING
~AR~.':.'.~.~ . r.'..:.•/.`.'....•. '.':2=KL'0~•'• • 1-SBD 60-STELLA D'ORO LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL R00T BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PRIOR 2-IG ~ . iTELLA D'ORO DRIVE THROUGH • • . • •
TD INSTALLATION. ..:.:.:.3.=t"M.~~.~....y'.'3-ICS 1-PAH DAYLILIES, 18" 0. • ~..~.B~fCS•.'.'..'. AYULIES, 18° o.c. 1-800-632-4949 Q
......,i.' : .
ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS 4 ~ • • • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 7-HFS AND DISEASE. ..~;r..'...'.I:'.'.~.'.~.~.~.~..'.'.~.'.'.'.'.~.'.'.'~~:.~j,;p . ~ GRASS AREA
1-TC 1-PAH I
THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS j • F~~SD~.. • • .S.~EP • • _ . . • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • TD 'DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS. ~ . .~.'.~t=1's.'..:.'.....'..~ ................~.~..~:..'....'1.'.~.' .
1-PAH p
PONDED AREA .'.'.~.-::.'.~::.'.~.'.'.~.'.6-BTCP-•• ~ 3-iCS X C~
:'.'.'.'.::'.'.:'.'.'.'.':ANNU 4-SBM 9-ICS ~ THE PONDED AREA SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 6°. • • . -ICS 1-VP
~•7-...~.~.~.'.'.'.'.'.'.'..~.'..'.'.'.'.' • • S~IVkIG:...:..._............... 3-KLR 4-AGS 3 .4-AGS 3-RC 1-RHC ~
THE AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT RUN-OFF DURING SITE • • • • • • • • 3-MB .............':.'.'.3-ICS .
GRADING. ' ~ • ~ •
A PROPER MAINTENANCE PLAN SHALL BE DETERMINED AND IMPLEMENTED ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • 3-AGS 3-HQ • . EXISTING , ~
T2 A I ~.l-AI7.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~.'.'.~.'.'.'.~.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~.......... ................3_SBQ..... 34-DE 3-HQ- ON A REGULA BSS. 3-AGS ' , WALK , ~ ~
' 5 LF b-1GS b. • Q 5-LF ' • • EXISTING PINE' •
~-KLR~...... . TO BE S~JED 1 ' .'.'2=.1.C4iG.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.':.'.'.'.'.'
EXISTING 30° CUL1rERT - ~ . ...1._x.....•..3-~giq.. ~ ~
N.....i..PF .......2..5B
SEE SHEET C7 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND PLANT LIST. i-TC ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ ~i ~ • • • • ~ • • ~ • ~ • • ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ • • ~ '.'3-ICS:..'
3-SBM • 3-Ai • 3-AGS ' 4-RHIaZ'~'•'•'~'•' ~
3-FM ~ ~ '.7=1CS~..' . 6: iCS...... • . .••3-IGS"' ~ 3-SBM . _ • • • • • • • • i • PROPOSED REGIONS BANK SIGN - FlELD LOCATE
-IG...... . r, 2-SBD . c• . : ' ~ ` ' ~ ~ - e • 2-SBD ~ ~9-SBD~~~.~.~:.. ~ - • • • (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) . • ~ • e ,
~ ~ n IRON ~ ' ' • ROP N
` NOTE TO SITE CONTRACTOR: BAR. ~ . - • - ~ - • - - - - - • - • .......i~PF. •~•~•7~E ~ 5 % NAIL S .
- - . - . - . .'.'3.= . A'.'.'. . -EXISTING TEES FIAT ARE DESIGNATED TO BE ' ~ ' _ S.y s s - S - _ • ~ ANNUAL COLOR ~~`~~N °CAR~
SAVED ON THIS DRAWING SHALL BE PROTECTED • ; • • . • • - •.~.-~::'.S'.'.-'. ' :......~s.'....~.~.....'...~ , ~ o-aD......... .
DURING THE SITE ~ONSi'RUCTIDN PROCESS BY au ED•..'.'.•. .....PP...~ ....1~.'CK':.~:.~.'.~:. ; ' • • ~ GRASS AREA = •w ~r•
INSTALLING A SUITABLE BARRICADE AROUND THE ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ " • ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ " • • • • • ~ " • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ' ~ " ~ ' E~... ' ' ' , 1-FP ; 502 ~
~IC TREE ~OR GROUP OF TRET=S THAT WILL KEEP EQUIPMENT, . 1-AB 1 CK ~ N fin.
VEHICLES, MACHINERY, PERSONAL, ETC. OUT GRASS AREA s spaces FROM UNDER THE DRIP LINE. ANNUAL COLOR ~y. 1-AB 6-FM - ~ ~ •.°J 10~. p ~ mfr
(NIC)
GRASS AREA GRASS AREA GRASS AREA EXISTING MAPLE -
SPRING. STREET ~~S 1-HPT TO BE SAVED ~ -
npAWING
IS 'I'NS 03-0~-2002
f'pOt'~~1•Y 0~ BASE INFORMAl10N GRAPHIC SCALE
o ,o ~
"~~I~v~ Tiun riTr n~ Au u,Ae nnrnAnrn nACrn nu Tnnnnn AnlJl.^~ IAlrnn\LA T/n\I nnn,nnrn .nv nAiu ~nnnwrr AnN 11TrnT In AI nrninu ~nT,,n~n
ima DI IC ruv9 nnJ rrtCrnrtGU DMJGU Vrl IVrWRhrnll, InrvrtmH llulV rRVVIUCU DI rMUL J-nmll I fvRdll ICI, IVRnL UWIbIV Z) Wulu.
ANn N01" 1'0 M U5r-112 PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING ROAD EDGES, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND OVERHEAD POWER LOCATIONS, CULVERT AND STREAM ALIGNMENTS WERE SITE 12P,,AWIN65
0k pl, r: pp0p UCr5 L-2 TAKEN FROM A PLAT TITLED "REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPOFATION" BY SYLVESTER & COMPANY, PA., DRAWING NO. 4254, DATED JUNE 4, 2001 AND REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2002.
VVTHOUr N151M?I1'1 N ~ IN FEET' ~jLANI~S/~CAI~~ 1 inch = 20 {T.
pr_ r-I.M1551ON

BRANCHING
HEIGHT
(A.A.N. STANDARD
R.UBBER_HOSE
SECURED WITH
NUMBER 12 GAUGE
PLIABLE GALVANIZED
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
PREPARED —
PLANTING MIX
-NOTE -ON STAKING: STAKING AND GUYING ARE TO BE
INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT -WINDY LOCATIONS AND
SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY DONE. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE
AND GUY, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND WIRES
SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
PRESSURE TREATED
2X2 STAKE
(3 STAKES PER TREE)
GRADE AT WHICH
TREE GREW
AT NURSERY
-SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX
MINIMUM
12" MINIMUM
DEPTH 'PREPARED
PLANTING MIX
COMPACT TO PREVENT
SETTLEMENT
TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL
N.T.S.
BRANCHING
HEIGHT
(A.A.N. STANDARD)
RUBBER HOSE
SECURED .WITH
NUMBER 12 GAUGE
PLIABLE GALVANIZED WIRE -
TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET
PEEL BACK TOP
1/3 OF BURLAP
(TYPICAL ALL
B&B PLANTS)
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
PREPARED
PLANTING MIX
P_
TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET
PEEL BACK TOP
1/3 OF BURLAP
(TYPICAL ALL
B&B PLANTS)
PREPARED PLANTING SOIL
MIRIFI 140N FILTER FABRIC
(COMPLETELY WRAP WASHED STONE)
SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE
NOTE ON STAKING: STAKING AND GUYING ARE TO BE
INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT WINDY LOCATIONS AND
SHOULD . NOT BE .ROUTINELY DONE IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE
AND GUY, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND VARES
SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
PRESSURE TREATED
2X2 STAKE
(3 STAKES PER TREE)
GRADE AT WHICH
TREE GREW
AT NURSERY
CORNER OF ROOT SYSTEM TO BE AT UNE OF
ORIGINAL GRADE
Fl*&Y FORK SAUCER (USE TOPSOIL)
ANGLE OF REPOSED VARIES WITH STEEPNESS
OF SLOPE AND SOIL TYPE
' 12" MINIMUM
DEPTH PREPARED
PLANTING MIX
COMPACT TO PREVENT
SETTLEMENT
TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL ON SLOPE
N.T.S.
.NOTE ON SLOPE PLANTING:
SHRUB AND EVERGREEN TREE PLANTINGS ON SLOPE ARE SIMILAR TO
ABOVE DETAIL FOR TREE PLANTING ON SLOPE
SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX —
MULCH WITH 3"
CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK
'1`1-115\MI-rTF,
.
npAWl NG
15 TH
rplorr- I'm
THF_ )WC
ACNP NOf
OI? I
WI11-IOU1
GRADE AT WHICH
TREE GREW
AT NURSERY
PLANTING MIX
COMPACTED
PLANTING MIX
6" MIN.
TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
N.T.S.
TOTALLY REMOVE VARE BASKET
PEEL BACK TOP
1/3 OF BURLAP
(TYPICAL ALL
B&B PLANTS)
PLANTING MIX:
THE PROPER AMOUNT OF CLEAN SOIL (OF SUITABLE TEXTURE)
AND COMPOSTED ORGANIC MATERIAL ALONG WITH FERTILIZER
AND LIME SHALL BE MIXED IN PROPORTIONS AS RECOMMENDED
BY A SOILS TEST AND/OR GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE FOR
EACH PLANT SPECIES.
SOIL DRAINAGE:
THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE IF THE PLANTING AREAS ARE
WELL DRAINED OR IF UNDERDRAINAGE IS REQUIRED. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT
THE SOIL HOLDS WATER AND PROPER DRAINAGE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED FOR
GOOD PLANT HEALTH, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED
AND A PLAN TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM WILL BE ADDRESSED.
PROPOSED TREE PLANTING (SEE TREE PLANTING DETAIL)
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
PROPOSED SHRUB PLANTINGS (SEE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL)
L SAUCER - USE TOPSOIL
_ CONC. CURB & GUTTER
SLOPE FORRD
ASPHALT PAVING
� A�� !—
"�
3/4" WASHED STONE 12" DEEP
PROPOSED 4` DIA. SLOTTED DRAIN PIPE
PREPARED SUBSOIL - COMPACT TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT
PLANT ISLAND UNDERDRAINAGE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
GRADING CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL PLANT ISLANDS THAT CONTAIN
IMPERVIOUS SOILS THAT WILL NOT ALLOW PROPER DRAINAGE FOR PLANT GROWTH AND HEALTH.
TYPICAL PARKING LOT PLANT ISLAND
N.T.S.
cn
w
w
Ir
N
m
m
w
x
cn
z
w
U-
cn
N
v7
NOTE ON STAKING: STAKING AND GUYING ARE TO BE W
INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT WINDY LOCATIONS AND f5
SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY DONE IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE
AND GUY, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND WIRES
SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
RUBBER HOSE SECURED cn
WITH f12 GUAGE PLIABLE D
GALVANIZED WIRE m
PRESSURE TREATED
2X2 STAKE W
(3 STAKES PER TREE)
SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX
GRADE AT WHICH
TREE GREW
AT NURSERY
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
PREPARED
PLANTING MIX
12" MIN.
COMPACTED-
PLANTING MIX
TOTALLY REMOVE VARE BASKET
REMOVE TOP 1/3
OF BURLAP
TYPICAL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL
PLANTS
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
PREPARED TOPSOIL
6" MIN. DEPTH
SUBGRADE
TYPICAL GROUND COVER PLANTING
N.T.S.
N.T.S. LAWN AREA
PLANTING OR MULCHED AREA
,fA A*fk .A*fA
3' CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH
e
6" 1WN(
N_ EXISTING GRADE
OR GRADE OF
TES- PLANTING AREA
TRENCH EDGER DETAIL SHALL
BE USED AT ALL LAWN EDGES &
O EDGES OF MULCHED AREAS
3' FOR CONTAINMENT
2. TRENCH EDGER SHALL CREATE
A CLEAN SEPARATION -BETWEEN
AREAS WITH SMOOTH, EVEN LINES
(AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS).
TRENCH EDGER Dr. -TAIL
N.T.S.
PLANTING LIST
KEY
NO.
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
CALDER HEIGHT
ROOT
GALLON
SPACING
SPACING
AB
2
ACER BIJERGERIANUM
TRIDENT MAPLE
V-10'
B&B
AS SHOWN
AR
6
ACER RUBRUM 'REO SUNSET"
REO MAPLE
2 1/2" 12'-14'
B&B
AS SHOWN
CK
2
CORNUS KOUSA 'MILKY WAY SELECY
MILKY WAY DOGWOOD
8'-10'
B&B
AS SHOWN
CV
1
CHIONANIHUS VIRGINICUS
WHITE FRINGETREE
W-10'
B&B
AS SHOWN
FA
2
FRANKUNIA ALATAMAHA
FRANKUNIA
8'-10'
B&B
FP
3
FRAXNNS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS' GREEN ASH
21/2' 12'-14
B&B
AS SHOWN
OR
2
QUERCUS RUBRA
RED OAK
2 1 /Y 12'-14'
B&B
AS SHOWN
QA
1
QUERCUS ACUIISSIMA
SAWTOOTH OAK
2 1/2" 12'-14'
B&B
AS SHOWN
TC
3
TSUGA CANADENSIS
CANADIAN HEMLOCK
W-10'
B&B
15' O.C.
7 GAL CONT.
8' O.C.
IG
12
ILEX GLABRA
INKBERRY HOLLY
5 GAL CONT.
6' 0.C.
IV
6
LEX VERTKX ATA
AGS
18
AZALEA 'GIRARD'S SCARLET
AZALEA (GIRARD)
W O.C.
3 GAL CONT.
3' O.C.
BTCP
6
1 BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON PYGMY
DWARF BARBERRY
7 GAL CONT.
3 GAL CONT.
3' O.0
CD
10
COTONEASTER DAMMERI
BEARBElRtY COTONEASTER
3 GAL CONT.
4' O.C.
FM
27
FOTHERGILLA MAJOR 'MT. AIRY
FOTHERGILLA
3 GAL CONT.
4' O.C.
HAA
3
HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
3 GAL CONT.
4' O.C.
HPT
6
HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'TARDIVA'
TARDIVA HYDRANGEA
7 GAL CONT.
8' O.C.
HQ
3
HYDRANGEA QUERCILFOUA
OAKLEAF HYDRANGEA
3 GAL CONT.
5' O.C.
HFS
11
HYPERICUM FRONDOSUM 'SUNBURST
ST. JOHN'S WORT
3 GAL CONT.
3' O.C.
KS
58
ILEX CRENATA 'STOKES'
STOKES HOLLY
13 GAL. CONT. I
3' O.C.
IG
20
ILEX GLABRA
INKBERRY HOLLY
5 GALL.. CONT.
6' 0.C.
IGS
15
ILEX GLABRA 'SHAMROCW
SHAMROCK HOLLY
3 GAL CONT.
4' O.C.
INBP
2
ILEX MESERVAE 'BLUE PRINCE
BLUE PRINCE HOLLY
7 GAL CONT.
8' O.C.
INS
1
LEX X NELUE R. STEVENS
NELUE STEVENS HOLLY
5'-6'
B&B
AS SHOWN
IVIG
11
I1T:A VIRGINICA 'HENRYS GARNET
VIRGINIA SWEETSPNE
3 GAL. CONT.
4' O.C.
KL
2
KALM A LATIFOLIA
MOUNTAIN LAUREL
—36'
BAaB
d' O.C.
KLO
2
KAL MIA LATFOUA 'OLYMPIC FIRE
HYBRID MT. LAUREL
3 GAL BAB
5' OC.
KLR
14
KALMIA LATFOUA 'ROYAL DWARF'
HYBRID MT. LAUREL
3 GAL.. em
S O.C.
LIF5
LEUCO HOE FONTANESIANA
DROOPING LEUCOTHOE
3 GAL CONT.
4' 0.C.
MB
3
MANONIA BEALE>I
LEATHERLEAF MAH014A
3 GAL. CONT.IW O.C.
PJ
3
PERIS JAPONICA
JAPANESE ANNDROIEDA
3 GAL CONT.
W 0.C.
PF
14
P07M LLA FRUIICOSA
BUSH CINQUIEFOL
3 GAL CONT.
3' 0.C.
RC
3
RHODODENDRON CALENDUTACELAA
FLAYS AZALEA
—36'
B&B
6' O.C.
RHiZ
4
RHODOOD DRON HYBRIDA 'NOVA ZEMEW
HYBRID RHODODENDRON
3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C.
RHC
RHODODENDRON RHODODENDRON HYBRIDA 'CIEIODES'
HYBRID RHODODENDRON
3 GAL CONT.
4' O.G
SBA
8
SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER'
ANIIHONY WATER SPREA
.3 rALI CONT.
4' MC.
SN
8
SPIRAEA MPPOMCA 'SNOWMOUND'
SNOWMOUND SPREA
3 GAL I CONT.
4 O.C.
SBD
20
SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'DOLCHICA'
DOLCHK:A SPREA
3 GAL CONT.
3. O.C.
SBM
14
SPIRAEA X BUMALDA WAJIC CARPET
MAJIC CARPET SPIREA
3 GAL. CONT.
3' O.C.
VB
2
VIBURNUM X BLOOMODN
BURKWOOD VIBURNUM
5 GAL CONT. 6' O.C.
VP
1
VUAMUM X PRAGENSE
PRAGUE VIBURNUM
7 GAL CONT.
V O.C.
DE
34
DRYOPTERIS ERYTHROSORA
AUTUMN FERN
QUART CONT.
18" O.C.
PAH
4
PENNIISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 'HAMELN'
DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS
1 GAL CONT.
AS SHOWN
60
FEMEROCALUS HYBRIDA
I STELLA WORD DAYLILY
1 QT. CONT.
18" O.C.
BIORETEN11ON AREA PLANT LIST
KEY
NO.
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
CALDER
SIZE
HEIGHT
ROOT
GALLON
SPACING
ACS
2
AMELANCHER CANADENSIS
SHADBLOW SERVICFBERR
W-10'
B&B
AS SHOWN
BN
2
BETULA NK;RA
RIVER BIRCH
21/2-
12'-14
B&B
AS SHOWN
FP
1
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS! GREM ASH
21/21
12'-14
B&B
AS SHOWN
NS
3
NYSSA SYLVAIICAA
BLACK TUPELO
2 1/2'
12'-14'
B&B
AS SHOWN
CAP
6
CLETHRA ALNFOLIA 'PINK SPIRES'
CLETHRA
7 GAL CONT.
V O.C.
CS
3
CORNUS STOLONIFERA
RED OSIER DOGWOOD
7 GAL CONT.
B' O.C.
HV
1
HAMAMELIS VRG N9ANA
COMMON WTTCHHAZEL
7 GAL CONT.
8' O.C.
IG
12
ILEX GLABRA
INKBERRY HOLLY
5 GAL CONT.
6' 0.C.
IV
6
LEX VERTKX ATA
COMMON WWTERBERRY
5 GAL CONT.
W O.C.
VD
3
VIBIJRf1UY DENTATUM
ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM
7 GAL CONT.
IV O.C.
DC
350
DESCHAIPSIA CAESPITOSA
TUFTED HAIRGRASS
QUART CONT.
18" 0.0.
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH SAME RELATION TO FINISHED GRADE AS IT BORE TO EXISTING GRADE AT NURSERY.
2. PRUNE NEWLY PLANTED TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD HORTLICULTURAL PRACTICE TO PRESERVE NATURAL CHARACTER
OF PLANT. PRUNING SHALL BE DONE WITH CLEAN, SHARP TOOLS.
3. B&B PLANT MATERIAL - COMPLETELY REMOVE WIRE BASKETS AND AFTER PLANT IS PLACED IN HOLE, CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP
FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALI..
4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE FULLY GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A WORKMAN LIKE MANNER USING ACCEPTED NURSERY PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS.
6. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM TO STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINDING OUT WHERE UNDERGROUND UTIU71ES ARE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THEM
DURING PLANTING.
& EXCAVATION NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE CAREFULLY DONE BY HAND.
10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE TO ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK.
11. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL ROOT BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
12. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY. VIGOROUS MATERIAL. FREE OF PESTS AND DISEEASE.
13. PLANT BEDS, NOT SHOWN AS LAWN AREAS, SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3" OF CLEAN. FRESH, & WELL SEASONED SHREDDED
PINE BARK MULCH.
14 THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBE FOR VER"ING ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, BEFORE PRICING THE
WORK.
15. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS TO DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS.
16. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO
FINAL BUILT CONDITION.
17. PROPOSED TREES IN GRASSED AREAS SHALL HAVE A 6' DIAMETER MULCH RING INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE TRUNK.
18. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL. DETERLINE F THE PLANTING AREAS ARE WELL DRAINED OR IF UNDERDRAINAGE IS REQUIRED.
IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT TFE SOIL HOLDS WATER MO PROPER DRAINAGE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED FOR GOOD PLANT HEALTH, THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND A PLAN TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM WILL BE ADDRESSED.
:'o��NCARO
• DSCR`''L':
=-o 5-- 502
:N n•• ar
,s �tjo
••.....•
Q
•
U
Wa
N
x
W
U�
rn
rn
Q
I
LLJ m
n co
N
v
Qn
U00
N
0 ¢
z
Zo
Q <
U
iE
w
Qz
z
vi
Q
<
} U
m ^ N
1..1�
N
Q -o
a = m
0- a. .
F-
L,J
H
U
Q
LL_
cl
LL1
I—
D
H -I
H
H
z
U
H
w
Q
LLJ
LL_
0
LTJ
pq
LLJ
00
0i o
U
z1
tD
0i
LO 1J1
C I
d
S 00
0)
LL
-N
CD
CD
1
0 %,D
011
CD I
Oj co
cu
_co
d-
gN
0
C7
_I
J
0
H
Q
D
zvz
��a4
03-04-2CrYl
/LANP5CAPF--
r-l-
fig- \I Ll

INVERT
3796.6
a V Q
PARKING SUMMARY: p P IMP RVIOUS AREA SUMMARY: ~ Mi pER
RO OSED E ~ ~ c uP R0.
~ HEATED BUILDING AREA - 5627 SF TOTAL AREA OF SITE MODIFlCATIONS = 1.2 ACRES ti `.k ~
PARKING AT ONE SPACE PER 200 SF = 28.1 SPACES ~ w 6~ \ ~
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.7 ACRES EMPLOYEE PARKING AT ONE SPACE A ro~~
PER TWO EMPLOYEES = 6 SPACES IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE = 58% y~c of U y~qN ~ RAVENEL
~~yy ~ AKE W C0 JITE ~ N
THREE DRIVE THROUGH LANES ALLOWING ~ C~~ ~ H
A REDUCI]ON IN PARKING AT TWO PER LANE _ -6 SPACES ~ HWY ORS w NG RO' I
JJ o 6 HARRIS U p ~ ~ 10 2 LAKE rn
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 29 (30 SHOWN) ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~S~ ~S Q~
2 ,c / 9,~9jG r ~C9 ro
~ ~1ti W ~ . ~ (CI Q~ 1 v
~C)~ ~
r
NORTH U min uAp
N
\ _ 1 °=2000' Q a - z ~ ~ 2 J
/ ~ ~ ° i
z~~ j - ~ U
J
REQUIRED STREAM BUFFER ~ - - ~ ~
ZONE (30' FROM TOP OF STREAM ~ EROSION CONTROL ° / ~ ~ ~ ~ z
BANK -EACH SIDE) i ~ / STANDARD EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE ~ ~
i / i ~ ~ ~ , ~ / , ~ INSTALLED TO CONTROL SEDIMENT RUN-OFF DURING w ~ Q- z
i \ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION. ~
BIORETEN110N ~1 = % = - - ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ °
BoTroM ELEV.=3811.1 ROPO ~ ~ MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-900 SF P SED ~ ~ ~ , A N ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~
RETAINING WALL i , i ~ E,~ ~ ~ W W ~ N -i ~ - ~ Ir, ~~x
MODULAR SYSTEM OR' _ % PROR 18° MCP ~ I r'i Quo W
' ~ ; 18' LONG AT 2.2% " STACKED BOULD , ~ i # ~ W ~ , Z w o 2 o „ LEGEND ~ o
_ ~ , , ,~G a ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ p
PROP. 18" RCP ~ -~E ~ ~g4, ~ ~ ~ / ~ i Y 44' LONG AT 2.0% / ~ " ~ ~ ~t ~ c~ V ~ EXISTING CONTOUR (2' INTERVAL)
v ~ ~ EP EPM ~ ~ ` - ~ w ~~5'
m RA NA Y ~ 2O' UNOPENED = CURB INLxET ~ F SOD D I GEWA ALLEY ( ~ ~ ~ ~ d d ~ cn E ~ ~ d d ~ .
EXISTING TREES w (TYPICAL) , RIM ELEV.=3809.95 F ~ , ~ INV. ELEV.=3$05.9 " a~ ~ -T 10 ~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE ~ p' C
PROPOSED EIP - N s3'a4'24" w , ~ 27a.7T E
DUMPSTER - ~ ~ ~ DIVERSION TW-12. ~ F. / E ENCLOSED BY FENCE o ~ LE~3805`5 + ~ ~ \ ~ ` AT RIP-RAP APRON ~
SWALE ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - e , ~ ~ E ~ ~
/ ~ ~ ' T 12. ~ SOD DRAINAGEWAY IAGEWAY -16'5 ~ ~ EXISTING TREES
f~ P~ I.E.=38045 + " (TYPICAL) c / 1,~ • 12. r ~ ~ E i PI
EXISTING ~ ~ , TW-11.0 ~ \ v Z ~ 10.5 ~
a ~ HOUSE % a LE.=`3805.0 + TW=13.0 r ~ ~ old J I~ ~
~ ~ G~ / ~ AT RIP-RAP APR N E ~ ti~ ZR ~ ~ G~ i ~ ~ 5~
SETBACK 10 0 ~ TW=13 8 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING eL _ Q
s ~ i , ~ ~
-.17 N , ~ ~ $ 12.4. ~ 11 ~ 3' CURB 9P~NING o ~tig U 10.0... 1D.o... ~ Y
~ 11.2 / _11:6 ~ P c,~ . . ~ . ~ NtfT. DERfC CURB 9- Z . DEFLECTORS SIREAAI BUFFER AREA Q
w . - - / 3" CURB OPENING ~a Q J
D ~ W PROPOSE M . ~ 0 13.5.. titi`~ _ ,4F_ INLET DEfLEGTORS , _ , _ , v ar 148 OF ~ I ~ V.
a ~~0.~ Pl 77 X 52 ARCH CMP ~ _ _ . ~ • EXISTING 24 Cl1l T_ ID ..381... INVERT
12.8,. ~ ~ HVAC HALF COATED dt PAVED _ ~E _ ~ ~ t t HVAC _ - (I) - Z 11.0 3806,3 ; JVERT
8 GUAGE CMP 6° ~ ~ ~ f~ ( ) 38083 PROPOSED BIORElEN1lON Z
AT 1.0 X SLOPE t~.g BIORETEN110N ~2 DRIVE THROUGH
O - CURB INLET BOTTOM ELEV.=3809.5 RIM ELEV.=3811.55 MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-500 SF 0 0 SF EXISTING SAN. $ Z
PROPOSED 3s N ~ - 11 2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS W 2 1i:fi SEWER LINE W... \ ~ Z
RETAINING WALL o INV. ELEV.-38D5s ~ rn b1 MODULAR SYSTEM OR ~ ..1.1_.2_.... o.. `~4, 3813 O 6 PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE 3
4D.D - PROPOSED STACKED BOULDER WALL is.o . 21 BANK BUILDING ~ . CURB & GU.TIER U TYPICAL Q
~ E ~
. F.F. ELEV. = 3815.0 Q ~ Q _ 21:a~ P~ Z • O
LE.=3806.0 + N~~ - BUILDING ROOF DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIRECTED r
21:0 19:0 21.0 TO BIORETEN110N #1 THROUGH PIPING UNDER ~d U
~ T.YPICAt THE SLAB. THE DRIVE THROUGH ROOF DRAINAGE ~ W ~ P. . G Z0. SHALL RUN TO BIORETENTION 2. Q
~ _ ..ANGLE . . 14.0... H.C. RAMP CUSTOMER N. fl A T PVMNT AS H.t. rs 2y' P~ rn 5 N
CURB & GUTTER ~ _ v? PARKING _ cA
TYPICAL c~ 13.6..'..'. . 61.0. 14.4
M r ~ ~ \ _ ti,
ASPHALT.PVMNT, N. _i X5,4: ~ ~ - E 13.5 PZ~
EXISTING 30" CULVERT - - 13.7 14:0 14. SWALE ~ DRAINAGE ~
. a. _ ~ . . • . EXISTING TREES 3813 ~
PROPOSED 14:0. . _ ~ _ Y .......13:7 ~ . 13.8 ~ - , U CANOPY TREES ~Pa ~ ~ PROPOSED REGIONS BANK
i4:o. (TYPICAL) W QP~ SIGN
\ 38 ~ pP 3g} ~ f~ DIVERSI
~ ~ 15.5 S 63'04'24" E %333.04' ~ / / SWALE P.K. Z 333.04'
NIP ~ NAIL Q ~ \
153 172 - J S
PROPOSED RELOCATED S S _ S - - UTILITY POLE S.. S P _
S ~ ~l ~ --as- . . ~ PROPOSED
W - .
CANOPY TREES ~ ~ I-
(TYPICAL) V1~t ~d (n
T.B.M. 6 spaces TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS ~
TOP OF MANHOLE OVERHEAD POWER (SHALL MEET NCDOT STANDARDS & SPECS.)
V.= 13.55 RELOCATE EXISTING SPRING STREET LINES ELE 38 UTILITY POLE
:~4~
_ r TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS ~ ~ I N F R , ~ ~ti ~ (SHALL MEET NCDOT ~ 6ti~
38108 STANDARDS & SPECS.) PROPOSED SIDEWALK (SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS \\`~~nuu,u~,~ /
STANDARDS AND SPECS.) ,~N CARS ~ '°°~'s°°~(,
~e°V ~a'f7 ~ N
- oW _ ~ Z v e~ 502 ~ ~ o
>
m
i ~ ~ U tY '.,,J S . W P~` ~ 0 0
nnnnn w
~ Q m o0
r - \ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
l
THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED BASED ON SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PAUL SCHMITT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. ~ za o ,o Za ea see
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED INCLUDED EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, STREAM BUFFER AREA, EXISTING UTILITIES, EXISTING CULVERTS, BOUNDARY OF
THE PARCEL, AND OTHER EXISTING FEATURES AS SHOWN. of 2
IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.

HERBACEOUS GROUNDCOVER IN BIORETENTION AREAS:
1-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA GROUPINGS OF PANICM VIRGATUM (SWITCH GRASS) AND DESCHAMPSIA CAES 4MPSIA CAESPITOSA LEGEND
SWEET PEPPERBUSH (TUFTED HAIRGRASS) IN THE WETTER AREAS. ( )
8' O.C., 5 GAL. 3-CORNUS STOLONIFERA
1-ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE) 3-ILEX GLABRA INKBERRY HOLLY RED OSIER DOGWOOD) ( ) ( Q
2 1/2 CAL. 8' O.C. 5 GAL. 8' O.C., 5 GAL. ,
1-NYSSA SYLVATICA (BLACK GUM)
3-ILEX VERTICILLATA (COMMON WINTERBERRY) 2-NYSSA SYLVATICA (BLACK GUM) 8' O.C., 5 GAL, 2 1 2" CAL. k LARGE CANOPY TREE Y) /
~ 2 1 /2" CAL. F-
X X 3-ILEX GLABRA (INKBERRY HOLLY} 8' O.C., 5 GAL. (~„J ^
3-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA m
(SWEET PEPPERBUSH) 1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY - ( ) x
X 3-ILEX GLABRA INKBERRY HOLLY 8' O.C., 5 GAL. ( ) 8'-10' HT. EVERGREEN TREE = w
X X 8' O.C., 5 GAL. X U~ 1 BETULA NIGRA (RIVER BIRCH)
2 1/2" CAL. ~ m i
4-ILEX VERTICILLATA (COMMON WINTERBERRY) QM
X 8' O.C., 5 GAL. ~ SMALL TO MEDIUM TREES r
X X ~ X N ~.1.~ ~ X 00
~v X
1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY X X ( ) / X Q
X 8'-10' HT. 2-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA SHRUB MASS U~
X ~ X (SWEET PEPPERBUSH) °D N X 8' O.C., 5 GAL.
~ X X Qa
GROUNDCOVER Z Zo
a Q~
~ ~ _ LAWN J ~
3-VIBURNUM DENTATUM SOD DRAINAGEWAYS ~ } ~
(ARROWWOOD) JJ ~ o 1-HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA ~ ~ \ Q Z
8' O.C., 5 GAL. 1-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA \J (COMMON WITCH-HAZEL} ' ~ ~
SWEET PEPPERBUSH ~ ( ) 5 GAL. ~ • EXISTING TREES Q W
8' O.C., 5 GAL. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL _ ~ _ i PZN~ Q
SOD DRAINAGEWAYS 1-BETULA NIGRA (RIVER BIRCH) MODULAR SYSTEM OR U
2 1 2" CAL. STACKED BOULDER WALL 1-FRAXINUS Pf / „ -FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA GREEN ASH) ~ m N ( ~ „ o ~ ~
2 1 /2 CAL. 1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS (SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY) 1 /2 CAL. W - N ~ J X
8'-10' HT. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING Q - o d m
w= . ~ o
BIORETENTION PLANTING PLAN d~a
STREAM BUFFER AREA
SCALE: 1 "=10'
REQUIRED STREAM BUFFER
ZONE (30' FROM TOP OF STREAM BANK -EACH SIDE) :AM
PROPOSED BIORETENTION
~ ~
BIORETENTION ~1 ` ~P Q x x ~
BOTTOM ELEV.=3811.1 PROPOSED MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-900 SF RETAINING WALL E ~ ~
i~ i J a ` I
MODULAR SYSTEM OR ~ ~ ~
STACKED BOULDER WALL E A ~ F ` ~ ~Z c " ~ Q
F f ~ V / ~ F ~.t L ° U
PROPOSED EVERGREEN ~ 20' ALLEY (UNOPENED) ~ ` ~ ~f E Y
BIORETENTION AREA SPECIFICAl10NS: TREE Q f E m P E ~ EPM F ~ Z s~ Z 2
~ K ` Q F F k Q
SOIL EXISTING TREES ~ ~ f ' F ? PROPOSED ` EIP E ` F J E ~ ~ F T i yep O
PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' DEEP DUMPSTER o E ~ F { ~ \ r ~ ~ ~ ' ^
ON A i' THICK SAND BED. PLACE IN MAXIMUM 18 LIFTS BY FENCE k c I v, F
AND LJGHTLY COMPACT. \ ~ , ~ a Z = p ~ t ~ ~
c SOIL COMPOSITION SHALL HAVE 10-25x CLAY AND SHALL BE ` ~ ~ ~ O
OF A SANDY LOAM OR LOAMY SAND TEXTURE. THE SOIL SHALL ? ` t E O 4 F~ \ ~ Z
BE CLEAN AND FREE OF HARMFULL SUBSTANCES TO PLANT GROWTH. ~ ~ ~ f P 4 ` EXISTING ~ P ~p,PL F r ` ~ Zp~ W
AND MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: HOUSE G~ ~ 1R~ ' THE SOIL SHALL BE TESTED 1 ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ O
pH RANGE - 5.5-6.5 ~ s ORGANIC MATTER - 1.5-3.0~ SETBACK ` 3 U
MAGNESIUM (Mg) - 35 LBS/ACRE 10.0 O 0 I-
PHOSPHORUS (P205 - 100 LBS/ACRE \ _ ~ E _ ~,E Z
POTASSIUM (K20) - 85 LBS/ACRE SOLUBLE SALTS -NOT TO EXCEED 500 PPM eI O _ ~ _ _ ~ U
.
PERFORM SUITABLE SOIL TESTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY FOR BIORETENTION AREAS) Q
b ~
MULCH ~ EXISTING 24 CULV. _ - 9a
A 2"-3" MULCH LAYER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON TOP OF THE PLANTING SOIL. HVAC k
THE MULCH SHALL INCLUDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD THAT IS SUITABLY AGED
AND FREE of FOREIGN MATERIAL AND PLANT MATERIAL. A WELL AGED w BIORETENTION 2 MULCH IS DEFlNED AS MULCH THAT HAS BEEN STOCKPILED OR STORED BOTTOM ELEV.=3809.5 EN110N 2 DRIVE THROUGH ELEV.=3809.5
FOR AT LEAST 12 MONTHS. PROPOSED _ MINIMUM SURFACE AREA SURFACE AREA-500 SF EXISTING SAN.
RETNNING WALL N PLANT MATERIAL SEWER LINE _ W._... _ _ .
MODULAR SYSTEM ~ _ ...9 T _ _ 2
STACKED BOULDER WALL • ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM TO STANDARDS SET FORTH BY _
THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN AND INSTALLED IN A PROPOSED D NURSERY PRACTICES AND a WORKMAN LIKE MANNER USING ACCEPTE to BANK BUILDING d ~ U Q
STANDARDS. LE.=3806.0 + o _ _ ~ W
ALL PLANTS SHALL $E PLANTED WITH THE SAME RELATION TO FINISHED ~ F.F. ELEV. = 3515.0 GRADE AS THEY BORE TO EXISTING GRADE AT THE NURSERY. ~ 15.0 j~E Y P
_ _
LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL ROOT BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CUSTOMER N NJ W Z
PARKING PROPOSED :D ~ Q
ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS ~ SHRUB MASS IASS ~ Q J
AND DISEASE. ~ f~r°. 0 U
THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS
TO DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS. . EXISTING 30" CULVERT ~ Q
PONDED AREA rn...... EXISTING TREES Z
THE PONDED AREA SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 6". . _ Q PROPOSED REGIONS BANK J
THE AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT RUN-OFF DURING SITE SIGN k
GRADING. _ 0
A PROPER MAINTENANCE PLAN SHALL BE DETERMINED AND IMPLEMENTED NIP PPS' P.K.
ON A REGULAR BASIS. ~ NAIL ~
PROPOSED RELOCATED S S S S
UTILITY POLE _ 5.. 5. . CA ~N......RO °o
- S S. ~ ~ ~ e°°P~S°`°.`/ i N
PROPOSED : c~~ ~ ~ z
= ~ ~ = o CANOPY 1REES - 502 ~ W _ _ _ cn
T.B.M. 6 spaces s e ~ ~~e t11l 0 ~ w TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS V ~
PROPOSED OVERHEAD POWER- iEAD POWER SHALL MEET NCDOT ° ~°^`':1~~~~ 0 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ( i~ /A e.e ~ ~ O o
~ MANHOLE SMALL TO MEDIUM ELEV.=3813.55 SPRING STREET LJNES TREE STANDARDS do SPECS.) S W P ~ '
'~~nnun~ ~ w PROPOSED m
GROUNDCOVER ~ a o o~
GRAPHIC SCALE
\ TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS
_ /CU A11 11[CT ~IMl1T o ,o ~ ~ sheet
STANDARDS & WV SPECS.) L PROPOSED SIDEWALK ILK . .
(SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLAND'. M OF HIGHLANDS of 2-
STANDARDS AND SPECS.) SPECS.) IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.

INVI-R1
379E~~6
PARKING SUMMARY: d Q aO~` ~ Mi pER LK'
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA SUMMARY: ~ O UP Rp. ~R
b HEATED BUILDING AREA - 5627 SF T AL AREA OF SITE MODIFlCATIONS = 1.2 ACRES ~ = OT ti ~ v ~
PARKING AT ONE SPACE PER 200 SF 28.1 SPACES ~ w 6~ \ ~
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.7 ACRES ro~~
EMPLOYEE PARKING AT ONE SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEES = 6 SPACES yip of U y~qN ~ RAVENEL 0 Wro
IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE = 583 AKE o ~N
THREE DRIVE THROUGH LANES ALLOWING h S~GQ ~ X ~ C Nw`( FOR R0, = w
A REDUCTION IN PARKING AT TWO PER LANE _ -6 SPACES ~ N
JJ ~ 6 HARRIS U ~ ~ ~ 10 ~ LAKE ~
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 29 (30 SHOWN) ti r~ ~ ~
~ vS Q ~
2 ~ / ~9TG r ~ ' ~ ~q ~
~ `~ti W
aZ, i (.,ti
Q / r_
NORTH U VIC~IITY MAP
N
1"=2000' ~ a ~ z
= Z o
~ i _ Q a
~Z i ~ A J
REQUIRED STREAM BUFFER / ~ ~W ~ A ~
ZONE (30' FROM TOP OF STREAM ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ EROSION CONTROL Q °z
BANK -EACH SIDE) ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ti STANDARD EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE ~
' / ~ ~ - w INSTALLED TO CONTROL SEDIMENT RUN OFf DURING Q _ / i \ z
~ ~ / i ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
BIORETENTION ~1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~i i age m N
BOTTOM ELEV.=3811.1 ~ j ins ~ _ o~~
RFACE AREA-900 SF PROPOSED MINIMUM SU , = , ~ ~ RETAINING WALL - ~ . - - = ~ ~ ~ - ~J ~ ~ o x
_ q MODULAR SYSTEM OR = ~ - ~ PROPS 18" ttCP = tT QUO tCP ~ / ~ (a ~ RI i i 9
STACKED BOULD = x 18' LONG AT 2.2% , ~ - , ' / (J cb ~ W = r 2.2~ E~ / ? ~ ~ LEGEND ~
' u1N o i~ w~ ~ d~ a
PROP. 18" RCP / ~ -/E ~ / ~ Y , 44' LONG AT 2.0% / ~ `Y8~ c^ ~ ~
U 6 t ~ x ~e ~ ~ , -EXISTING CONTOUR (2 INTERVAL) EPA' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~5
m ' ~ U~ CURB INLET ~ SOD DRAINAGEWAY 20 ALLEY ( PENED RIM ELEV.=3809.95 ` ~ dd ~ ~ ~ 3
EXISTING TREES ~ (TYPICAL) F F ' ~ INV. E~.EV.=3805.9 ` ~ i1~ 1~8 ~ PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE
PROPOSED N s3ro4'24" w ~~o,~y x EIP i ` ~ ~i) ) ~ ~ _
DUMPSTER Tw=12. ~ - ~ ~ E DIVERSION / LE~3805'S + - ~ ~ ~
ENCLOSED BY FENCE o ~ ~ ; SWALE ~ ~jv~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ` AT RIP-RAP APRONS
\ E k i ' SOD DRAINAGEWAY =16.5 ~ ~ )RAINAGEWAY y ~ l~~ EXISTING TREES
j LE.=38045 + 4, (TYPICAL) ~ )AL) ~ / z1~ 1
_ ~ ~ 1,E • 12. E - c,~~ ~ ~ ~ \ MP - ~ ~ ~ - Z _ \ ~
EXISTING a TW-11.0 ~ ~ HOUSE ~ - .E.=X3805.0 + =1 ~ E ~ -11.0 ~ ~ 10.5 ,ail ~ ~ E
_ TW 3.0 ~ ~ AT RIP-RAP APR ~ ~ 00~ 1R ~E i ~ ~ 5~
. ~ tl`P . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g1R ~ SETBACK TW=13 8 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING
10.0 ~ e ~ eI Q ~ ~
w ro 12:4.- W tig U _ i o ~ ~ .....10.0..........10.0....-_ Y ~ . r
rn ~ _ CA 3' CURB 3' CURB Z ~ ~
~ 11.2 PZ . 116 ~.W H.P. ~ ~ NL1=T pE u; ~ 3" CUaB OPENING ap ~ o a ~ . ~i~ o NLET pEFLfGTORS.. _ ~ STREAM BUFFER AREA Q Q J
PROPOSED ~4; W AT INLET DEFLECTORS.... _ r!~ ~ ~ 1.3;5.. w c^ I
148' OF m ~ ~~..........1~~... ~XISTING 24" CULV. E ® _ 3811 I, RT
AR H CMP ~ _P. 7TX52 C z.8 - , HALF COATED do PAVED ~ EM Hvac I ~yE ~ - T HVAC 3806,3 - _ ,vvtR f
~ , - 8 GUAGE CMP bo ~ ~ / 11'0 ' 38083 PROPOSED BIORETENTION Z w
~ : ~ BIORETENTION 2 AT 1.0 X SLOPE _ _ .13.8 # O DRIVE THROUGH _ ~ ~
~ CURB INLET BOTTOM ELEV.=3809.5 ~ 0
RIM ELEV.=3611.55 MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-500 SF PROPOSED N o ~ INV. ELEV.=3805.9 4-500 SF EXISTING SAN. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS W Z 11.2 1.2.. _ 11.6 _ SEWER LINE
RETAINING WALL W. ~ Z
, m. MODULAR SYSTEM OR 4o.a PROPOSED 1 b:2... a.... 3813 Q b PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE 3 CURB & .GUTTER.- U
STACKED BOULDER WALL ...1 ~ BANK BUILDING a TYPICAL N ~ _ ~ - I-
a<~' 1s.a 2}, F.F. ELEV. = 3815.0 a . _ _ o Q 21:0 e~'~ Z
LE.=38x6.0 + _ o ~ . ~ O
' W BUILDING ROOF DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIRECTED 21:0 19.0 ~ 21.0 ~ ~ TO BIORETENTION 1 THROUGH PIPING UNDER D U
TYPICAL THE SLAB. THE DRIVE THROUGH ROOF DRAINAGE SAGE ~ Q
W _ P. . G SHALL RUN TO BIORETENTION #2. E~ _ . . - . ANGLE.. 14:0 H.C. RAMP A L PVMNT:.. ASPH L y. 0 ~ a.. Z P N
CUSTOMER. N w . ^ S
CURB & GUTTER ~ PARKING . TYPICAL w 13:6
6.1..0 _ . 14.4 M . ~ -~`3 `Z
14. , ASRHALT PVMNT. ^ N Pg~ _ _ ~
~ ~ 13.5 ~t\1E - _ P
EXISTING 30" CULVERT - - - .,._.13:7. 1.4:0 14.3 DRAINAGE SWALE / ~
. . Y ~~:'~_~381~3~ _ _ f ~ ~ EXISTING TREES ~ ~
PROPOSED 14:0. ~ _ ~i 13:7 . ~ 13,b ~ Q ~,P / ~ PROPOSED REGIONS BANK
CANOPY TREES N m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~P SIGN
TYPICAL t 4.0 ~ W ~ )
- ~ti ; , 3$15 ~ MPP DIVERSIO / SWALE
- 15.5 S 63'04'24" E 33.0 NIP 33.04' _ P.K. - ~ NAIL Q
_ . . .
15:3 . 17.? ~ S PROPOSED RELOCATED _ S... S S
UTILITY POLE S . S.. - P P S _ . 0 ~ ~1 Y
~~~1 ~ ~ - J_. - _ PROPOSED W
CANOPY TREES ~ ~ v
(TYPICAL) ~
T.B.M. 6 spaces TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS ~
TOP OF MANHOLE OVERHEAD POWER - RELOCATE EXISTING SPRING STREET LINES (SHALL MEET NCDOT STANDARDS & SPECS.)
ELEV.-3813.55 UTILITY POLE

i~~,
TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS n~~, INVERT SHALL MEET NCDOT OP`~ P'P8 ha~~
Q ( PROPOSED SIDEWALK 3810 ~ STANDARDS & SPECS.)
(SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS STANDARDS AND SPECS.) DS `\`tttuuinu~N q/ ~ ~ARp % _
N"...".,,~ ~
~~V ~tM~ 'f~+ N ~ ~ ~ ~
a- 502 ~r - ~ o_
_ -
%C •.,,1~,.. p ~ ~ a~ w
~~i/A ~ © H ~ S . W P~ 0 0
'mnnntt 1 w
P ~ m Q ~
GRAPHIC SCALE
T~~~r r~~ A.. ~~,AQ ?or?AOrn DACCn nu cii?~rrv IAICl1?\IATInAI oornnnrn ?v oAiu crwuTr ADrLJITCrTIIDAI nrcir_Ai cnin~n l\ ~n n to 9n 40 ~ Sh P,P.t
I n1,) 011C rLHIN VTM0 rRLr/'\(\LU UFIJLU VI If JVI\NLI IINI VI\mlm II VIN I I\VNIVLU UI I f1VL JVI IINIII I -WI IIILV IWIN- V-WI I ~ IVVIV.
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED INCLUDED EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, STREAM BUFFER AREA, EXISTING UTILITIES, EXISTING CULVERTS, BOUNDARY OF THE PARCEL, AND OTHER EXISTING FEATURES AS SHOWN. 71 1 0
J90
( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft.

_
HERBACEOUS GROUNDCOVER IN BIORETENTION AREAS:
1-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA GROUPINGS OF PANICM V1RGATUM (SWITCH GRASS) AND DESCHAMPSIA CAE ~AMPSIA CAESPITOSA LEGEND
SWEET PEPPERBUSH (TUFTED HAIRGRASS) IN THE WETTER AREAS. ( )
8' O.C., 5 GAL. 3-CORNUS STOLONIFERA
1-ACER RUBRUM (RED MAPLE) 3-ILEX GLABRA iNKBERRY HOLLY RED OSIER DOGWOOD ( ) ~ ) Q
2 1/2 CAL. 8' O.C. 5 GAL. 8' O.C., 5 GAL. Q..
1-NYSSA SYLVATICA (BLACK GUM) „ k LARGE CANOPY TREE
3-ILEX VERTICILLATA (COMMON WINTERBERRY) 2-NYSSA SYLVATICA (BLACK GUM) 8' O.C., 5 GAL. RY) 21/2 CAL. w
~ 2 1 /2" CAL.
X X 3-ILEX GIABRA (INKBERRY HOLLY) U 8' O.C., 5 GAL. W m^
3-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA
(SWEET PEPPERBUSH) 1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY ( ) x
X 3-ILEX GLABRA INKBERRY HOLLY 8' O.C., 5 GAL. ( ) 8'-10' HT. EVERGREEN TREE = w
X X 8' O.C., 5 GAL. X U~ i 1-BETULA NIGRA (RIVER BIRCH)
2 1 2" CAL. ~ m i
4-ILEX VERTICILLATA (COMMON WINTERBERRY) Q M
X 8' O.C., 5 GAL. ~ SMALL TO MEDIUM TREES ~
N W ~ X ~
X X ~ X 1..L X
1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY X ( ) Q X SHRUB MASS ~
X 8'-10' HT. 2-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA
X X (SWEET PEPPERBUSH} ~0O N X 8 O.C., 5 GAL a
~ X X D / GROUNDCOVER z
Zo
c Q ~ ~ ~U
~ LAWN
3-VIBURNUM DENTATUM SOD DRAINAGEWAYS J ~ JJ ~ O
(ARROWWOOD) _ V ~ Oz 1 HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA
8' O.C., 5 GAL. 1-CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA \ COMMON WITCH-HAZEL ~ ~ ( ) ~ ~
SWEET PEPPERBUSH ~ ( ) 5 GAL. ~ • EXISTING TREES Q w ~ ~ _
8' O.C., 5 GAL. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ~ PINS Q
SOD DRAINAGEWAYS 1-BETULA NIGRA (RIVER BIRCH) MODULAR SYSTEM OR k } U
2 1 2" CAL. STACKED BOULDER WALL 1-FRAXINUS f / „ -FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA GREEN ASH ~ m N ( ) ~ o ~ ~
2 1 /2 CAL. 1-AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS (SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY) 1 /2 CAL. w - N ~~x
8'-10' HT. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING Q - °m d =
w ~ o
BIORETENTION PLANTING PLAN d ~ a
+ STREAM BUFFER AREA
SCALE: 1 "=10'
REQUIRED STREAM BUFFER
ZONE (30' FROM TOP OF STREAM BANK -EACH SIDE) tEAM
PROPOSED BIORETENTION
i ~ ~ ~
BIORETENTION #1 ` P Q ~ ~ ~
BOTTOM ELEV.=3811.1 PROPOSED MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-900 SF RETAINING WALL ? ~ Z
i` ~ i J
MODULAR SYSTEM OR ~ ~ # c = ~ x ~ ~ ` ~2 -C
STACKED BOULDER WALL f F ~ ' ~ ~ ~ J Q
~ ~r f f f ~ 0 1 ` ~ ~ ~ U
PROPOSED EVERGREEN k ~ 20' ALLEY (UNOPENED) F ` R Y
BIORETENTION AREA SPECIFICATIONS: TREE a ~ E 0] F ~ t 4 ` ~ Z ~ EPA' E ~ s~ Z =
Q Q ~ J
SOIL EXISIING TREES N ~ f ` E PROPOSED _ ` OP ~ ` E a M ~ ~ Lj,~ i O
PLANTING SOIL SHALL EIE A MINIMUM OF 4' DEEP D(JgP$TER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ F ~
ON A 1' THICK SAND BED. PLACE IN MAXIMUM 18° LIFTS ENCLOSED BY FENCE o k ` ~ ` F 4 ~ ` ` f / L f F F ~ ! {n Z i
AND LIGHTLY COMPACT. \ ~ ~ r F ~ 1 E ~ ~ O w
SOIL COMPOSI110N SHALL HAVE 10-25% CLAY AND SHALL BE ~ a ` ~ ~ ~ E f E~ - ~ ~ ~ ~
OF A SANDY LOAM OR LOAMY SAND TEXTURE. THE SOIL SHALL ~ ~ Q E E F~ ~ ~ W Z
BE CLEAN AND FREE OF HARMFULL SUBSTANCES TO PLANT GROWTH. ~ ~ ~ E ~ EXISIING PP PPL ~ `
HousE M R~ F THE SOIL SHALL BE TESTED AND MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: ~ \ Z ~ f s ~ Z ~ o
pH RANGE - 5.5-6:5 ~ ? ` ORGANIC MATTER - 1.5-3.0% ? f U
SETBACK MAGNESIUM (Mg) - 35 L$S/ACRE 10.D O 0 I-
PHOSPHORUS (P205 - 100 LBS/ACRE ~ F ~ E Z PIS
POTASSIUM (K20) - 85 LBS/ACRE SOLUBLE SALTS -NOT TO EXCEED 500 PPM O
U
PERFORM SUITABLE 501E TESTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY FOR BIORETEN110N AREAS) Q
N.- . EXISTING 24" CULV. r
MULCH 9 a
A 2"-3" MULCH LAYER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON TOP OF THE PLANTING SOIL. HVAC k
THE MULCH SHALL INCLUDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD THAT IS SUITABLY AGED 2 DRIVE THROUGH
AND FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL AND PLANT MAIERIAL. A WELL AGED w BIORETENTION ~Y MULCH IS DEFINED AS MULCH THAT HAS BEEN STOCKPILED OR STORED $OTTOM ELEV.=3809.5 ~ ELEV.=3809.5
FOR AT LEAST 12 MONTHS. PROPOSED MINIMUM SURFACE ARE M SURFACE AREA-500 SF EXISTING SAN.
RETAINING WALL PLANT MATERIAL SEWER LINE _W.
MODULAR SYSTEM OR s S
STACKED BOULDER WALL ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM TO STANDARDS SET FOR1H BY N . a U
THE AMERICA ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN AND INSTALLED IN A PROPOSED N MANNER USING ACCEPTED NURSERY PRACTICES AND ~ Q
WORKMAN LIKE BANK BUILDING STANDARDS. LE.=3806.0 + N ~ • LLB
_ ~
ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH THE SAME RELATION TO fINISHED _ F.F. ELEV. = 3815A GRADE AS THEY BORE. TO EXISTING GRADE AT THE NURSERY. - - - a~5.o ~ ~,E Y P~ to

LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL ROOT BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PRIOR ' TO INSTALLATION. CUSTOMER.. N~ . Z
PARKING ~ PROPOSED ;ED _ ~ Q
ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PES1S ~ SHRUB MASS MASS ~ J ~ Q • U ~
AND DISEASE r~ r.......- N
THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS ICE ~
TO DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS. a_. EXISTING 30" CULVERT ~ P
PONDED AREA ~ . EXISTING TREES Z
THE PONDED AREA SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 6". ~ PROPOSED REGIONS BANK J
THE AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT RUN-OFF DURING SITE SIGN
GRADING. y
A PROPER MAINTENANCE PLAN SHALL BE DETERMINED AND IMPLEMENTED NIP PPS' P.K.
ON A REGULAR BASIS. NAIL ~
PROPOSED RELOCATED S S S
S. S U11L]TY POLE S . S S.. _ CAR o . '~n N 0~ o
w0~' ~'Qd°? ~
PROPOSED ~ ~ = ~ z
CANOPY TREES _ e~ 502 ~ ~ - . _ N
T.B.M. 6 spaces TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS ~ ~ 10~~. o ~
PROPOSED TOP OF MANHOLE SMALL TO MEDIUM OVERHEAD POWER- RHEAD POWER (SHALL MEET NCDOT iA 0 ~ ~ 0 0
ELEV.=3813.55 SPRING STREET LINES :S STANDARDS & SPECS.) S , W O
TREE PROPO ~ m
GROUNDCOVER o
GRAPHIC SCALE
TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS
/cu~i i urrr ~innnr zo o ,o ~ ~ see
ann~~ ML-L-1 nwv i PROPOSED SIDEWALK STANDARDS & SPECS.) NALK
(SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLAN )WN OF HIGHLANDS of 2
STANDARDS AND SPECS.) ID SPECS.) ( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.

d-
GENERAL NOTES:
NOTE °A' - 4' WIDE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES 6' LONG WITH 2' BETWEEN. SEE SHEET C3 FOR SITE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER/DEVELOPER: ~ I- ~
NOTE "B" - 4" WIDE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES AS SHOWN ON PLAN. Q ~ - ~
REGIONS BANK NOTE "C" - DUMPSTER CONCRETE PAD 6" THICK WITH 6 X 6, w2.9 x w2.s w.w.F. 111 GREEN STREET, SE ~ ~K• w U ~ ~~Mi~~ ~ppER H -
WITH 2 BUMPER GUARDS AS SHOWN. BUMPER GUARDS SHALL BE p. ~ z I ~~R~ R =
3 1/2° DIA. X 36" HIGH GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE CONCRETE FILLED - GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA 30501 PAINTED YELLOW. PAD IS 6' x 7'. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA SUMMARY: 770-503-2000 Q1 s ~ v ~ \ ~ ~ ~
~ Q ~
NOTE "D" -PROPOSED CURB OPENING SHALL HAVE A TAPERED CURB 4' EACH SIDE OF OPENING. TOTAL AREA OF SITE MODIFlCAl10NS = 1.2 ACRES T °~V~ U ~ I
NOTE "E" -ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED MATH 6" CABC, 2" TYPE HB BINDER AND 1 1/2" OF Nagy 0~. ~ ~ ~qN ~ RAVENEL W ro p ~
TYPE I-2 SURFACE COURSE ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE. ALL MATERIALS SHALL MEET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.66 ACRES OS AKE ° d (LJ . ~
THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NCDOT STANDARDS FOR ROADS ~ COTE x W S ~
ANO sTRUCTURES. IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE = 55~ W'I pRSE = W ~ ~ NC. H N RO• ~ -m
HARRIS U ~ F- X U 106 LAKE rn _
1. DIMENSIONS TO CURB AND GUTTER ARE TO FACE OF CURB. DIMENSIONS TO BUILDING ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING. . n ~ I- d
~ ~ti ~ Q~ -
2. REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THIS PLAN AND ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS TO THE ti ~~~G ~ ~ ~C9 W N V J
ARCHITECT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PROPOSED 3O' STREAM BUFFER EASEMENT: k ~y n ~ z
3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 30' FROM TOP OF STREAM CHANNEL ~ ~ f..l~ Q ~ U ~ Q ~o
AND BONDS FOR WORK DONE ON STATE OR CITY PROPERTY. ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREAM. r H
U~ ~ ~ VIgNITY MAP NORTH ~ w o
~ ~ _i Q a Q `D
1 "=2000' Z
ZJ w ~ ~ z `D I~
PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALL QQ ~ ~ o I
MACHINE STACKED 3' CURB OPENING ,URB OPENING ~ ~ ~ ~
( ) AT I NLET DEFLECTOf (SEE SHEET C1) (SEE DETAIL #8 ON NLET DEFLECTORS + + + + . ~ ~ ~ ~ :DETAIL #8 ON SHT. C3) + + + + ~ Q Z ~
LEGEND ~
PARKING SUMMARY: + ~ w
BIORETENTION ~2 - (BY OTHERS) + + QW ~ ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + EXPANSION + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + CONTROL I~ ~
HEATED BUILDING AREA - 5627 SF SEE DETAIL #8, SHT. C3 FOR DETAIL + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ JOINT JOINT U w r-I
PARKING AT ONE SPAC PER 200 SF = 28.1 _ MINIMUM SURFACE AREA = 600 SF + + + + + + + + + + + E SPACES BIORETEN~ION #1 (BY OTHERS) - SEE DETAIL #8, SHT. C3 FOR DETAIL + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + r ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + ~EiP + + + + + + m N
EMPLOYEE PARKING AT ONE SPACE MINIMUM SURFACE AREA = 900 SF - + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK o ~ ~ X + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / W ~ N O
PER TWO EMPLOYEES = 6 SPACES + + + - - + + + + + + ~ ~Jx pq + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = Q _ o
~~~r- + + + + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _ ~ m + + + + + + + + + + + + + w= _
THREE DRIVE THROUGH LANES ALLOWING + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING ~ a ?
A REDUCTION IN PARKING AT TWO PER LANE _ -6 SPACES - - - - - - - _ ~ ~ ± _ _ + ± ~ ` J + + + + + + + + + + + + o ~
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 29 (30 SHOWN) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + a'
~ + + + + + + + + + 2Q' ALL€Y +(UNOPEi~IED~j + + + + + - - 70F74'+- + 70.74'+ + + + + + + +
Q + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + m + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + STREAM BUFFER AREA + + + + + + ~ + 1 + + + + + +
IRON w + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
PROPERTY LINE N N 6 72 W ~7 .~17' PIN - - + + + a + + + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + + IRON + + + + + + + Plpl + +
+ + + + + + + + + + +5~- + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + ~
- - _ ~ - ~ _ ± + ± ± + _ - 0~ + ± + + + ~ + + + + ~ + + I~ + + + " PROPOSED BIORETENTION
+ + +
3' CURB OPENING + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + AT INLET DEFLECTORS 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + EXISTING SAN. - - ~ _
(SEE DETAIL #8 ON SHT. C3) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - N + + + ' + SEWER LINE ~ EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE & POLE I--•
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +o+ + ~ SETBACK 10.0' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - o EXISTING ~o 11 ~ ~ ~ ~
HOUSE o / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + °D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - S - EXISi1NG SANITARY SEWER LINE & MANHOLE
o i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ~ l~ ~ W
B MPER ~ 1i ~ , ? .
2 DETAIL k SHEET NUMBER 4-I Q . ~ C3 I--1 0'
CONC. DUMPSTf]~ ' - - - - 4 9. CURB 6' + ~ PAD (NOTE C ) 4.... 9 CURB 2 A
C3 .INLE . ~ / l of . R2.0 r yy o..... C3 INLE7 _ o TRAFFIC DIRECTION ARROWS w•' ~ ~
. 8. '`~l . 5 FENCE _ _ _ _ 4 ~ ~ ~ . o EXISTING 24" CULV. _ PROPOSED CURB INLET d J' 0 ~ V.
R>4,0•...... , C3 ENCLOSURE ^.0, ; .
N S ~8 ~ P D CONCRETE CUR
p 20,0• ROPOSE B & GUTTER ~ DRIVE THROUGH b Z
PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALL ~ R .44> DRIVE TI _ . 24 o.
(MACHINE STACKED) / / / : / o _ I--I
( ) ~ . ~ o _ SEE SHEET C1 ASPHALT PVMNT. / / ~i~ C3 I--I ~d A
NOTE "E" / ~ NOTE "B" CONCRETE - ~
_ / 40.00- //TYP l ) N _CURB & GUi l` ~R ~
NOTE "B° 0 19.00' 2 ~ A JYPICAL_ A
a HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES: o ~ . SIGNS, SYMBOLS AND RAMPS SHALL v-~ 10.0'.. 9:0 .00 . 9,0... 10,0'.. 9:0'
l MEET THE N.C. STATE HANDICAPPED m . ~ . C3 CODE. ~ NOTE °Ar ~
21:00 x9.00 .21,00'...... HANDRAIL BOTH x iv `TYPICAL 0 SIDES OF RAMP
c~. .PARKING N . SEE ARCHITECTURAL _m_ AH6LE t? ASPH. LT PVMNT' ~0 . ~
CONCRETE ~ . n j' DRAWINGS) 4 - . NOTE. E p.' ~ ~
CURB & GUTTER ( 0• , CONC. WALK r' _ .I 4 CURB OPENING , Q NOTf .B".
TYPICAL _ ~ o H.C. RAMP FOR DRAINAGE 61,00'.. - 5.0'.. l~ . ~ ~
o (FIELD LOCATE) ~ NOTE .~D,~ ~ 6 ~
a C3 ~ ~ r~ ~
. o R6l EXISTING 30" CULVERT - - - m - - ~ - - - - -TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS - -880.0 - ~ PR R - ~ N ~ ~ ~ OPOSED EGIONS BANK SIGN FIELD LOCATE
i~~.. FLAGPOLE (SHALL MEET NCDOT , (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS)
~ STANDARDS & SPECS.) _ i.) N ~
CONCRETE om BURIED
O: WALKWAYS ~ v N w - -~c- w TANK N / i EXISTING
~ (TYP) ~0. ~ 90 .d ~ q 0 WALK ~ ~ /
0 IRON a - S 37 .3.6 ~3. e o i PROPERTY LJNE
BAR _ 80:00' R0: ~ ~ NAIL ~ 00 RCS ~ s
- _ 0 _ . . PROPOSED RELOCATED m - ~ . _^ry~_ . - . _ _ _ S - - - - -.S SQ - -s- \ s=- ,
UTILITY POLE Q~ h `S - . S ~ o 42.83 , . 38.94
. ~ 0 ~ o~• ~ a n• ,
T.B.M. _ _ ^a "a.
OF MANHOLE _ _ _ /
ELEV.=3813.55 ~'s ~ EXISTING EDGE 6 spaces ~ _
~ ?0• OF ROAD ASPHALT ~4 i _ Q' / ~ _ _
20.00' 25.50' 20.00' 17.82' 75.86' Q 32.45' 11o.4s' - _ _
4' TAPER AT END ° SPRING STREET OVERHEAD POWER OF CURB ELOCATE EXISTING h ~
UTILITY POLE ~ LINES i ~ - _ CAR
i . ~
TYPICAL H.C. RAMPS 2' WIDE CONC.
(SHALL MEET NCDOT GUTTER DRAINAGEWAY ~ c~ STANDARDS & SPECS.) PROPOSED SIDEWALK C CONCRETE CONNECT PROPOSED t^g WALK AND CURB & GUTTER = ~ = CURB & GUTTER = .r- 5O2 ~
CONCRETE (SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS T TYPICAL TO EXISTING. o~
CURB & GUTTER STANDARDS AND SPECS.) ~ti .
TYPICAL DRIVEWAY ACCESS: ~,~A .,alb,,. 'o W P
ALl PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS TO SPRING STREET i~ S .
SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ~-a• ~ Nu~~~
iO
~I~ 1 j r A f; V r
bpAWING
~
I i:::> I rir-
ppOpF-pTY OF BASE INFORMATION GRAPH~-S6~LE 05-042002
CALL UL CO p ,o 20 a 80
THF- AI?CN11-F-C-'
ANn NOT TO 13F USFn THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PAUL SCHMITT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. PRIOR TO DIGGING
Op I?r-ppOnLlC[~n PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING ROAD EDGES, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND OVERHEAD POWER LOCATIONS, CULVERT AND STREAM ALIGNMENTS WERE TAKEN FROM A PLAT TITLED "REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION" BY SYLVESTER & COMPANY, PA., DRAWING NO. 4254, DATED JUNE 4, 2001 1-800-632-4949 SITS IWAWINGS
WI-rHOU1' H15 VWIT` E-~N AND REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2002. ( IN FEET ) i ;ooh = 20 ft
L~ ~YO LIT
1551 ON
1~ L- ~°~Ill

2" X 8" 6" X 6' _ 2" X 8"
CAP BOARD 6 0 O.C. MAX. CAP BOARD POST .tea ~
~ ~q ~
PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS IN CONCRETE CURB. 1° X 8" TRIM - ~ ~
_ - i 1 X 8 TRIM " 6" BOARD PROVIDE 1/2 EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS = , BOARD • ~ o TRIM U
NOT TO EXCEED 50', AT THE ENDS AND MID-POINT - 1'-0" " Q
OF RETURNS AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. 6 X 6 POST I- _ ~ ~ H z I
ASPHALT PAVEMENT " 1" X 6" 1 X 6 VERTICAL BOARDS Z ~ BOARDS ~ ~ U
5" 1" RADIUS VERTICAL BOARDS - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ (1J
I I i ~a ~ Q ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ U ~i
1 1 /2" RADIUS 5'-0" - - - 2' X 6" STRINGERS 2" X 6" STRINGERS-BACK ~ ;INGERS-BACK SIDE OF FENCE ~ W ~ W ~ ~
- ATTACH TO POSTS WITH DAI ~ ~ d POSTS WITH DADOED JOINTS. (GALV. ANGLES NEEDED AT CORNERS) ~ ~ ~ a J (1J
6" ~ a ~ - x W s CO
\ ~ 1" X 4" TRIM FINISHED GRADE ' ~ o BOARD _ _ _ _ BADE ~ = w ~ PROPOSED PLANi1NGS ~
~ 9 ~ 0 7" - 6" ~i~ D ~ ~ SEE SHEET C6 -LAN U ~ I- X ~ ~ ~ DSCAPE PLAN H =
4 o - 4" CLEARANCE ~ ~ ~ d ~a ~ (/j , LL
_ a , ~ 4" ~ a a d -
- -7- ~ ~ n z ~ ~ ~ INLET DEFLECTOR: (3' WIDE) ~ H
~ FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER W a ~ PROPOSED BOULDER TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO ^ z
- CABC a POST ANCHOR: TYPICAL " " ( ) 1 X 4 TRIM 3000 PSI CONC. USP TIMBER CONNECTORS BOARD RETAINING WALL ~ ~ ~ ~ Q `D 810RETENTION BASIN. U ~ O
CURB & GUTTER - 3'-0" HEAVY COLUMN BASE 13000 PSI (SEE SHT. C1) Q H ~ /fir` ~ ~ ~
CBE66 12 GAUGE SLOPE TOP OF FTG. FOR DRAINAGE m a CONC. FTG. TYPICAL IAGE U ~ ao W O
1'-6" a ~ _ I MAXIMUM PONDED WATER PROPOSED GRADE Q a Q (/j ~
COMPACTED PROPOSED GRADE DEPTH = 6 Z
SUBGRADE OUTSIDE FACE OF ENCLOSURE -ELEVATION ZJ W N 3:1 MAX. CURB OPENING ~ _ ~ ~
ASPHALT PVMNT. Q a ~ O U
N ~ L~
(DRAINAGE TOWARDS CURB) 1'-6., 2" X 4" TRIM BOARD O ~ M
RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF " " PLYWOOD) Z W 6" MAX. ~
SCALE: 1 =1 -0 SECTION VIEW _ - ~ IIII 1_11111-1111= _ W W
3/4" PLYWOOD - - - a ~ h Q - ~ W -111 I I_I I I I I-1 I I I I-111 I I-1 I -111 I I-1 I I I I-1 I I I ~I I I"
FACE OF CURB BACKING 2" X 4" CAP " " _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - a of (IIII-IIII =11111-(IIII-1 III_IIII I-IIII IIII I-IIII IIII I_ - II-1I ~ W
1 X6 =IIII (IIII-IIII VIII-1 11111=11111=11111=11111- m N
VERTICAL BOARDS VIII I IIII=1 II I_I III - o ~ n X ~ ~ N O
PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS 6° 6" X 6" POST - - - - - - - - - - - - 2" X 4" TRIM BOARD IN CONCRETE CURB. -1111 111=11111 VIII J x
1'-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - -RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF PLYWOOD) FOOD = _ - Q _ o ~ 11111= 1111=1 111=III a m 4' " MI .
PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 50', AT THE ENDS AND MID-POINT PLAN VIEW AT GATE EDGE OF GATES _ = w= - =11111 II-11111 VIII ~ o
OF RETURNS AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. 1' X 8" TRIM BOARD (IIII_ I I I I IJ = a a a ~ III~II PLANTING SOIL ~
5" 1" RADIUS =11111 I I=11111 SEE SHEET C6 -LANDSCAPE PLAN
I ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2' X 4' CAP 10'-6" O.C. 1 1/2" RADIUS 2" X 4' CAP 11111- 11111- 111 FOR BtORETENTION AREA SPECIFICATIONS
- 1"/~6' -11111 II-11111 1111
a VERTICAL BOARDS 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD 6 ~!-IIII~ ~ 6'X6"POST 11111=I IIII " = 1'-0" MIN.. SAND BED
a~ ° ° - - - _.y IM AR I X 6 POST II=11111 IIIII~ -
-t-J - III~
I , ~ ~ - - - T-HINGE (3 E, 7" - Q ~ 0 1" X 6" VERTICAL -T-HINGE 3 EACH SIDE =VIII VIII-I~IIII~I IIII-11111-11111-11111-11111-11111 IIII _ - _ _ _ _ _ - II IIII IJIIII~IIII II_11111=11111=11111_11111=IIIIi~lll l~ II
D ~ a 6~~ - a BOARDS 1" X 6" DIAGNOL X 6" DIAGNOL BRACE ~ C,
4^ a ° 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD 0 BEYOND 4 -0" _ BIORETENTION AREA `
1" X 8" TRIM BOA CABC I J X 8 TRIM BOARD
3000 PSI CONC. , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3/4' PLYWOOD ~ i; ~ ~ -
CURB & G -III - I ' ' - _ _ UTTER - 1'-6" I I. BACKING I ~ ~ , W
° ~ " FlNIS u n FlNISHED GRADE ~ ~ - 4--# ?
1' X 4" TRIM BOARD - -
COMPACTED " „ SUBGRADE HASP LATCH 1 X 4 TRIM BOARD I H NOT TO SCALE A
SECTION VIEW AT GATE CANE BOLT 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD INLET DEFLECTOR: 3' WIDE INLET DEFLECTOR: 3' WIDE ( ) ( )
(DRAINAGE AWAY FROM CURB) 8'-0° FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER
TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO BIORETENTION BASIN. CL BASN BIORETENTION BASIN. I--
SCALE: 1°=1'-0° ELEVATON AT GATE OUTSIDE FACE coNC. cuRB ~ GUTTER fER z
9° H V
1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS FILLED WITH - ~ ~ 4 - H BACK OF CURB
CURB dt GUTTER PREMODU)ED JOINT MATERIAL do JOINT SEALER PAINTED SOLID WHITE I
1 -0 30'
3000 PSI CONC. PAD WITH STIFF BROOM FINISH. NOTE ON FENCING: V ^ ~ 1--i
ALL SCREWS. NAILS AND OTHER FASTENERS SHALL BE HOT DIPPED I ~ ~ ~OQ~ ~
6" THICK 3000 PSI CONC. PAD GALVANIZED FOR EXTERIOR USE. ~ 60' r 3 -7
- 4 i
-a, 6' X 6" W4.0 X W4.0 WWF ALL WOOD SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE. - - i ~ ~ Q i ~ FACE OF OF GUTTER
2'-4" ~ STANDARD CURB ~
'C Q , _ Q a 2"
Q- CURVE W CURVE WHERE ~ CURB TRANSITION AT CURB INLET
0 0 ~ INDICATE[ INDICATED ON PLAN ~
a ~ o
~ 8" CABC
I FRAME. GRATE ~ HOOD BY I'-0" T~IDALL 123-CGO OR APPROVED EQUAL
- SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" FiNl41 GRADE ( )
-III COMPACTED SUBGRADE ASPHALT
-III- ~ I-I I I-
- ~ I...I:_:',_,i.:. i - TOP GRATE ~ - - - - ELEV. AS NOTED -I -
, -I - ~
SCALE: 3/4 -1 -0 -
NOTE: SCALE: 1"=1'-0" PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS FILLED WITH - PRECAST ooNC~ETE eo~t
PREMOULDED JOINT MATERIAL & JOINT SEALER (20' O.C. MAX. AS ' MATH KNOCI(OUT PANELS
SHOWN ON PLAN} AS MANF. BY TiNDALL OR APPROVED EQUAL
PROVIDE I/2" DEEP SCORE JOINTS AT 5' O.C. WITH ROUNDED EDGES
AS SHOWN ON PLAN.
6" SCH. 40 PVC DRAIN UNE WALKWAY SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS STANDARDS AND ~ 4" THICK CQNCRETE WALK WITH STIFF BROOM FlNISH
AND 2" SMOOTH TROWELED BORDERS. BROOM FlNISH SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR ~ ~
CONCRETE CATCH BASIN 2' SQUARE FINISHED GRADE SPECIFICATIONS. E ( ) 1 TO TRAFFIC FLOW.
WITH CAST IRON GRATE FOR ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW _
=1 I I=1 III=1 I I=1 I I=1I I=1 11=
III=III I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I 6 X 6 - W2.9 X W2.9 WWF CENTERED ~T STONE,
=III=1 I1= 3000 PSI CONCRETE IN WALK THICKNESS. , -111
6" SCH 40 PVC - _ (I I ROOF DRAIN UNE _ _ _ a a a II= 1/4"/FT CROSS SLOPE .II
III=III III i /2" EXP. JT. - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I=1I1=~ _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 o I1= °o°00000°00000000000°0°0 _ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _
, coMPACTED = 111= 1= I =1 I 1=1 11= I = I I III _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a CONC. CURB & GUTTER - - -I I I- i I I_ s~sr ~'r - 4 ! 41. -I 10 1 11 1 1 1 111!
SUBGRADE UNDER CATCH BASIN - - - - - = = ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ' ~ r - - I - NuM~~
III o 0 o III a o o ° ° ~ ~ COMPACTED SUBCRADE ,~``1~N„~ARO ~,"^°PNDS°°a~i
1= 11= ° ~IIS - III o 0 o III - ~ B , 0 0~ C,~,'L '
AWING - o~ ~a - , 4 ~ D
III o o a III - ' _ 502 A: =
S 1`N~ I I- I I- - N4T TO SCALE III III 4" WASHED STONE (SHED STONE ° °o,~~ O~'O~'2002
pt?Op~~1"Y 0~ - - II= _ _ = II= COMPACTED SUBGRADE BASE ~o,,i~,,o o.
~I~ ApCNI~C~" III-1 1=III III=III=III - NOT TO SCALE IIII 1
. Il ~
ANrJ NUT TU M U5W
or, t?~I~f?OnU MIRIFI 140N FILTER FABRIC L#57 WASHED STONE L
Cr-I2 COMPLETELY WRAP DRY SUMP 7 CONCRETE WALK DETAIL DRY SUMP 2 SQUARE X 3' DEEP. „
WITHOUT H15 Wpl1'1FN SCALE: 1 =1 -0
~'~t?MISSION

INVERT ~
3796.6 ~
OD ~ N ~
PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES: K I-- O
PIPE FOR STORM SEWERS SHALL BE CLASS 3 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) PROPOSED 30' STREAM BUFFER EASEMENT: ~~Mil P4ER L Q U - `D
ACCORDING TO ASTM C76, AASHTO MI70. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. , c U RO' W U ~ ti ~Rk ~ F- _
SEE SHEET C4 FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 30 FROM TOP OF STREAM CHANNEL ~ ~ H z I CHANNEL ~ _
DETAILS AND SPECIFICAl10NS. PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE CLASS "C" (ORDINARY) EXCEPT UNDER PAVING WHICH ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREAM. SHALL BE CLASS B . ~ U ~ A T~ \ ~ ~ Q/ ~ l U
y~ ~ Ul cy~ of Q ~
ALL WORK, MATERIALS, AND PROCEDURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF HIGHLANDS OR THE NCDOT WHICHEVER IS GREATER. qN0 ~ RAVENEL U ~ I
SITE AKE W ro l~ ~ OO ~ COQ ~ ? d
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAl10NS AT CURB & GUTTER ARE BASE OF CURB, TRENCHES SHALL NOT REMAIN OPEN DURING RAIN PERIODS. WHEN RAIN IS EXPECTED, RSE ~ N J l U ~ C. HO RO • - ~ W
TRENCHES SHALL BE CLOSED, COVERED, OR OTHERWISE PREVENTED FROM TOP OF CURB IS 0.5' HIGHER. CAUSING EROSION & SILTATION. ~ N W S ~ ~ HARRIS = ~
106 ~ LAKE ~ ~ ~ • n U ~ I-- X
THE PROPOSED STREAM CULVERT (ARCH CMP) SHALL BE INSTALLED DURING A DRY WEATHER PERIOD WHEN NO RAIN IS EXPECTED DURING THE INSTALLATION PERIOD. N' ` ~ H cA S ~~S ~ F- Cj
A GEOTECHNICAL ENgNEER SHALL INSPECT THE AREA AND PROVIDE SPECIFlCAl10NS c, ~ / 9 9T M ~ , LL 2 G Q ~ -
FOR PROPER UNDERCUTTING AND BEDDING. ~ ~\~9 ~ Z ~ ~ti rn
BIORETEN110N #2 - (BY OTHERS) (SEE DETAIL ~8 SHEET C3) ~ W N V 1
BOTTOM ELEV.=3809.9 tiZ blg~ ~ Z ~ Q `D
MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-600 SF U ~ O Q
VICINITY MAP NORTH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U~
,,nnro W ~ 1 "=2000' V ! N ~ _ I
i PROPOSED STREAM Q Q ~ ~D
PROP. 18" RCP 32' LONG AT 4.19: ~ RELOCATION ~ W (1J
(Q25=2.9 CFS) Zg~ Z o Qa ~ O
" ~ PROP. 18 RCP ~ + + ~ I ~ + ~ ~ J (1J CO
32 LONG AT 3.4X D BOULDER RETAINING WALL ~
(Q25=3.6 CFS) PROPOSE (MACHINE STACKED) + = + LEGEND ~ ? (LI + + ~w ~ O z _ 00
TOP OF WALL ELEV.=3813.0 + + ~ + oti° + + A , ~
(SEE SHT. C1) / ~ + ~ + + + + + + + EXISTING CONTOUR 2' INTERVAL ~ W ~ w + ~ ~ + + + + + + + + _ pq ~Q
BIORETEN~ION #1 - (BY OTHERS) ~ ~ + + + + + + + + + Q ~
DETAIL SHEET C3 _ , ~ ~ ~ + . (SEE N8 ) ROOF DRAIN OU AT , - ~ ~ g~, PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE ~ W ~
BOTTOM ELEV.=3811.5 CATCH B SEE DETAI . ~ , ~ MINIMUM SURFACE AREA-900 SF SHT. 3 INV. 09 / + + + + ~ + + + + + + ~ m " 2 ~ w + ~ X
i _ t
/ ' + + + + + + t + ~ + + ~ J + + + + + + + t + + +(X7+ + Q ~ p w + ~
CURB INLET f_ + + + + + t, + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ + ~ ~ EXISTING TREES m _ o o ~ 0 W =
_ _ RIM ELEV.=3811.95 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ± ± + + ZR+ + + + + . + + + + n. ~ a _
INV. ELEV.=3805.9 ' ~ ~ + + +~t-~+ + ~"g~+ - E ~ ~1' . - + + + + + + + + + ~ +S ~ ~ t- + + + ~ rn t~~
+ + ~ + + + + + RELOCA~ ± + + + + + + + + + • ~S~ TOE OF FlLL SLOPE Y + ~ \ ~ + + + + + + + + + + + 2a ~LLE~Y EABANDONEDj + ~ + + ~ ~s~ NE.-$80#. cn
~ Q + + + ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ ~ + + " + + + + + + PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING
IRON ~ + + t-+.,f , + + + + + + + + ~ + ~ ~ h3 PIN + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + ~ ONE +
DIVERSION / ~ o + + + + + + + ~ _ + + + ~ + + y'
EXISTING TREES SWALE ; ' ~ ~ o _ ~ + + CU1F6 INLET + + + (HAND - ~ - - _ ~ + + • +
(SHALL BE SAVED) ~ + + ~ + + + + + - ~M VF 3$10.5 + + + ~ ~ Py w + + ~ INV~ V.=3 d5. + PROPOSED STREAM RESTORATION AREA + + + , ~n ~ I'~ + +
~ ~ + + + + S•qR + + + + + + t0~ a ~ ~ C_~ + ~ V ~
~ ~g4~ ~ ~ ~ t~P ~ .E.~3804. + , + + + + + + + + + + EXISTING ' % ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + m + 10.9 ~ ~ ~d~
12 _ HOUSE ~ + + + ~ _ + + + + ~ ~~ETBACK ~ + + + + + + + + + + ~ 1 2
ti~ ~ $IR~ E ~ + + + + + + + + i ~ S PROPOSED BIORETENTION
~j ~ • ~ + + + + 38®9 + + + + ~ PZ
8~ ~ ~
~ 1t .10.4 _ .1.0.4........__._. ~ 11.2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS H H
PROPOSED CULVERT: $ . ~ ~ - - - - - - / `~cP _ / ; ~ NG. 3813
120 OF 73 X 55 , 12 GA. ARCH CMP 5 X 1 CORR., TYPE 2, ALUMINIZED FROM ~.oo $ / 3 GUR6 OPENI PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE Q Ai' INLET.-DEFLECT. S
l 2 o~~ 13 WILLCO (ASHEVILLE, ) ~ ro . w ~ N . . NC OR EQUAL N6 24'~tJLV.
y~ \ AT 1.0 ~ SLOPE. ~ - - - _ SILT FENCE 3811. o--fl--a
. H AC (Q25 = 209 CFS) Qg~"~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - - i 11 - - - INVERT AC 11.0
b i l.~ / - ~ _ i' I _ _ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ INVE 3808.. TEMPORARY STONE CHECK DAM
/ / - I ROOF DRAIN OUTLET AT j..'. i DRIVE THROUGH
/ O _ CATCH BASIN (SEE DETAIL ,~4 I / / SHT. C3 1NV. ELEV =3807.9) '4 EXISTING SAN. 11.2 ~ FABRIC CATCH BASIN PROTECTION t~
~ , - ~ 1 11:fi SEWER UNE F--I V 11.2 I---I
PROPOSED 15.0 _ ~ 15.0 p~ I ° 6ti PIPE OUTLET STONE APRON
/ BOULDER RETAINING WALL is % ~ ~ ~ 3' CURB OPENING PROPOSED CURB do GU.TiER ~ I ......TYPICAL LLJ
= 13.5 - ~ ~ I AT INLET DEFLECTORS BANK BUILDING TOP OF WALL ELEV. 38 - - - S ~ EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE & MANHOLE C_, ~ A
~ ai F.F. ELEV. = 3815.0 (MACHINE STACKED) a
a (SEE SHT. C1) LE.=38os.o + ~ Q ~ - - ~ - - EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE AND POLE ae _
_ / 6" SCH 40 PVC i TW=13.0 PROPOSED TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
_ i _ ~ ROOF DRAIN LINES ~,4, ~ TYP. p~ryT 0 ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED 6° SCH. 40 PVC ROOF DRAIN LINES _..ASPH T ~ ~ ~
a.. . 60 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ( ) DOWNSPOUT LOCATION ° MI a...
I ROOF DRAIN LINE (TYP.) CURB & GUTTER _ .1.4..0 CLEAN-OUT (TYPICAL) 4'_C BOP 1NG ~ ~ DOWNSPOUT LOCATION FOR. RAINA ~ ~
TYPICAL 12.4..... , ~ ~ . ROOF DRAIN UNE CLEANOUT
14.4 CONC. SPLASH 13.6 14. - BLOCK i tip, ~
PROPOSED STREAM HALT PVMNT. ~ , _ _ _ _ REMOVAL titi~~ ' _ ~ EXISTlNG.TR ~lE i
LENGTH=146' " - SHALL: SAVED _ .13.5 PI / ~ . - - ~
( ) - - EXISTING 30 CULVERT ~ .14.0 14. DRAINAGE SWALE . ~ i ' ' ~ ~ XISTING TREES
~ '13.7 _ v 3813 _ . OWNER/DEVELOPER.
...........13:7.. o Q
14:0 ~ . _ _ . T3.6 14.0 ! _ N~ ~ pF~ ~ REGIONS BANK
1 PP N 111 GREEN STREET, SE . ~ M DIVER 381... ~ ~ swA ~ GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA 30501
° _ 15 - P b % _ ~
IRON - ° . S 37 .36. ° b3 . ~ NAIL 770-503-2000
° 4a_ - . _ _ 15. - - - - 17:2 - - - _ _ - ~ s , - -0 \ ~
PROPOSED RELOCATED . - S UTILITY POLE S. - _ ~a_ / / ~ \ _ a . -
. 'I - ~ o- /
T.B.M. 'S
TOP OF MANHOLE
ELEV.=3813.55 2' WIDE CONC. GUTTER 6 spaces ~ , ~d~ / _ L
DRAINAGEWAY. /
PROPOSED / _ _
RELOCATE EXISTING SPRING TREET CURB & GUTTER OVERHEAD POWER UTILITY POLE (SEE DETAIL #2, SHT. C2) LINES
/ _ ~ _ / - - _
EXISTING PAVEMENT
SHALL BE REMOVED ~tia~ /
INVERT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION tig~ btig~ ~ 8~ ti2 bti
3gIO.8 ENTRY ~ EXIT
END CURB & GUTTER AT POINT OF CURVE
TANGENCEY
\ \\~~,,,u u ~ u,n''
pQ,o°,,P SCgp,'G ,
~e~, %w v8
1'I-I 15 ~ 0 502 ~
npAWING °
I5 BASE INFORMATION ,,-gyp ° °P~~~' 0~-0~-2002 GRAPHIC SCALE s .
pt?O~~f?1"Y 0~ CALL ULOCO f-~~ o ,o zo ~
THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PAUL SCHMITT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. 1'N~ Af?CN11~C1' PRIOR TO DIGGING .0
PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING ROAD EDGES, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND OVERHEAD POWER LOCATIONS, CULVER I AND STREAM ALIGNMLN I S WLKL 1-800-632-4949 ~ ~ ~ ~ " 7,'U 51 MWINGS
ANn NOf rO PF U5E19 TAKEN FROM A PLAT TITLED "REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION" BY SYLVESTER & COMPANY, PA., DRAWING NO. 4254, DATED JUNE 4, 2001 IN rear)
or, p[~ppOpljc[~ AND REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2002. i inch = Zo G I~A1~ I N G
WITHOUT H15 Wp11WN
f~~PM15510N

UNDER ENTIRE DAM FOUNDATION
INCLUDING ABUTMENTS. -
OVERLAP STRIPS 1', WITH UPSTREAM SECTION A—A
STRIP OVER DOWNSTREAM STRIP.
N.C.D.O.T.
#57 STON
TEMPORARY CHECK DAM
NOT TO SCALE
METAL STAKES
7"N 15
PP,AWI NG
15TH 1-
PrlorrpTY Or
TNF_ A1;�CHITFCT
ANP NOT TO PF u5E12
Or, 1��pI�Oi�UC�f�
WITHOUT H15 Wpl-'TF-N
PFWAA 15510N
SSS 1 OR CLASS B
FROL STONE
JNE.
'ATCH BASIN
FAKE
NOTE - FABRIC MATERIAL SHALL BE 1/4- HARDWARE CLOTH
FABRIC DROP INLET PROTECTION
NOT TO SCALE
K
00
MAX. 2
1
SHAPE BORROW INTO EARTH BERM
SCE
STANDARD
SYMBOL
50' min.
EXISTING
PAVEMENT
EXISTING 3' S•�
GROUND
6" MIN.''
FILTER MOUNTABLE BERM
CLOTH TITI/IT:TTT T, (OPTIONAL)
TIT AAT XTTTTLT
EXISTING
PAVEMENT
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. STONE SIZE - Use 2" stone, or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent.
2. LENGTH - As required, but not less than 50 feet (except on a single
residence lot where a 30 foot minimum length would apply).
3. THICKNESS - Not less than six (6) inches.
4. WIDTH - Ten (10) foot minimum, but not less than the full width at points
where ingress or egress occurs.
5. FILTER CLOTH - Will be placed over the entire area prior to placing of stone.
Filter will not be required on a single family residence lot.
6. SURFACE WATER - All surface water flowing or diverted toward construction
entrances shall be piped across the entrance. If piping is impractical,
a mountable berm with 5:1 slopes will be permitted.
7. MAINTENANCE - The entrance shall be maintained in a condition which will
prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto public rights-of-way. This may
require periodic top dressing with additional stone as conditions demand and
repair and/or cleanout of any measures used to trap sediment. All sediment
spilled, dropped, washed or tracked onto public rights-of-way must be
removed immediately.
8. WASHING - Wheels shall be cleaned to remove sediment prior to entrance
onto public rights-of-way. When washing is required, it shall be done on an
area stabilized with stone and which drains into an approved sediment
trapping device.
9. Periodic inspection and needed maintenance shall be provided after each rain.
OBTAIN BORROW FROM EXISTING GRADE
W �
EXISTING GRADE--\
2' MIN. —/RUNOFFco
a °o
1 3 MIN.
SEDIMENT
TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERM & DITCH
NOT TO SCALE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NOT To SCALE
14 GUAGE 6"X6" (MAX. OPENING)
WELDED WIRE HOOKED ONTO PERFORMED
CHANNELS ON METAL POSTS.
ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANT (BLACK)
MIRIFI FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT SECURED
TO WIRE W/METAL CLIPS OR WIRE AT
12" ON CENTER.
MAX. SEDIMATE STORAGE LEVEL REMOVE
i SEDIMATE WHEN THIS LEVEL IS REACHED
OR AS DIRECTED BY CONSERVATION
- = INSPECTOR.
SHEET DRAINAGE (ONLY)
...... - - EXCAVATE 4"X8" TRENCH UPSLOPE FROM
SILT FENCE. CARRY APPROX. 12" OF
FABRIC INTO TRENCH, COVER W/SOIL &
TAMP BACKFILL.
ATURAL GRADE
CARRY 8" OF HARE INTO TRENCH.
METAL POSTS AT 10' O.C. MAX.
SILT FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
FLOW
CMP OR RCP
RIP -RAP APRON
DEPTH = 1 1/2 TIMES THE MAXIMUM
STONE DIAMETER, NOT LESS THAN 6".
FILTER FABRIC --- crr nnm upw
TYPICAL PIPE OUTLET
NOT TO SCALE
SURFACE AREA=LENGTH X WIDTH (L X
SEDIMENT STORAGE
VOLUME = 1800 C.F./AC.
SEDIMENT CLEAN -OUT' -
LEVEL = 1/2 DESIGN DEPTH
EXISTING GROUND —
FLOW —�
FILTER FABRIC
CREST OF
SPILLWAY
OUTLET
CV
� 2�M
in LL_
J q
�9
-f'
WIER SECTION
BASIN SECTION
WIER LENGTH
z
io
3' MIN.
5' MIN.
NO.
D
LA
d50
1
18"
10'
4"
2
18"
10'
4"
1.5' MIN.
FREEBOARD
EXTEND RIP -RAP TO STABLE GROUND
CLASS B
EROSION CONTROL STONE
N.C.D.O.T. #57 STONE (3/4" WASHED STONE)
FILTER - 1' THICK
TOP OF
DAM
FILTER FABRIC
SFB# WIER LENGTH
DISTURBED
DRAINAGE AREA
MINIMUM
SURFACE AREA
MINIMUM
STORAGE VOLUME
L
W
1 4.0'
0.8 AC.
1000 SF
1440 CIF
40'
25'
SEDIMENT FILTER BASIN
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. FINISH GRADE TOLERANCES SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.
THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY MAKE GRADE CHANGES AS NECESSARY IN
THE FIELD WITHOUT EFFECTING THE UNIT BID PRICE FOR UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION.
2. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL FILL AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
IN LAYERS OF 10" MAX. THICKNESS, WITH WATER ADDED OR SOIL
CONDITIONED TO THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND COMPACTED WITH A SHEEP'S FOOT ROLLER TO A
COMPACTION EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 95% OF THE DENSITY
OBTAINED BY COMPACTING A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE
WITH AASHO T-99 AS MODIFIED BY THE N.C.D.O.T., UNLESS SPECIFIED
OTHERWISE IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.
3. ENTIRE AREA TO BE GRADED SHALL BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. NO FILL
SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY AREA NOT CLEARED AND GRUBBED.
4. ALL SOIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE GRADING
PLAN SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND PRIOR
TO GRADING. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCES,
BALES OF STRAW, ETC., SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN WORKABLE CONDITIONS
FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT AND SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT ONLY AFTER THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL.
IF DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT A STORM CAUSES
SOIL EROSION WHICH CHANGES FINISH GRADES OR CREATES "GULLIES"
AND "WASHED AREAS", THESE SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO EXTRA COST,
AND ALL SILT WASHED OFF OF THE PROJECT SITE ONTO ADJACENT
PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT NO
EXTRA COST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ANY APPROVED
EROSION CONTROL PLANS WHETHER INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS OR UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
5, DISPOSABLE MATERIAL:
A. CLEARING AND GRUBBING WASTES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE
SITE AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS
EXPENSE, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.
B. SOLID WASTES TO BE REMOVED, SUCH AS SIDEWALKS, CURBS,
PAVEMENT, ETC., MAY BE PLACED IN SPECIFIC DISPOSAL AREAS
DELINEATED ON THE PLANS. THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE SPREAD
AND MIXED WITH DIRT ELIMINATING ALL VOIDS. ALL THIS
MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 2". THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL MAINTAIN SPECIFIED COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS IN
THESE AREAS. WHEN DISPOSAL SITES ARE NOT PROVIDED, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THIS WASTE FROM THE SITE AND
PROPERLY DISPOSE OF IT AT HIS EXPENSE.
C. ABANDONED UTILITIES SUCH AS CULVERTS, WATER PIPE,
HYDRANTS, CASTINGS, PIPE APPURTENANCES, UTILITY POLES,
ETC., SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE SPECIFIC UTILITY
AGENCY, OR COMPANY HAVING JURISDICTION. BEFORE THE
CONTRACTOR CAN REMOVE, DESTROY, SALVAGE, RE -USE, SELL OR
STORE FOR HIS OWN USE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY, HE MUST
PRESENT TO THE OWNER WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE UTILITY
INVOLVED.
6. ALL INCIDENTAL CONCRETE USED IN GRADING WORK SHALL BE CLASS D
(2500 PSI).
7. IN THE EVENT EXCESSIVE GROUND WATER OR SPRINGS ARE ENCOUNTERED
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
NECESSARY UNDER DRAINS AND STONE AS DIRECTED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
ALL WORK SHALL BE PAID BASED UPON UNIT BIDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED
OTHERWISE.
8. ALL DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN AND DETAIL SHEET.
ALL DITCHES ABOVE PROPOSED CUT SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR
TO EARTHWORK. CONSTRUCTION OF ALL GRASS DITCHES AND INSTALLATION OF THE
EROSION CONTROL FABRIC SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO
UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION.
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION OF ADJUSTMENT
OF ALL UTILITY SURFACE ACCESSES WHETHER HE PERFORMS THE WORK
OR A UTILITY COMPANY PERFORMS THE WORK.
10, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL ALL "DUST" BY PERIODIC WATERING
AND SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS AT ALL TIMES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS
WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES. ALL OPEN
DITCHES AND HAZARDOUS AREAS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.
11. ALL AREAS WHERE THERE IS EXPOSED DIRT SHALL BE SEEDED, FERTILIZED,
AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE FINISHED
SURFACE SHALL BE TO GRADE AND SMOOTH, FREE OF ALL ROCKS LARGER THAN
3", EQUIPMENT TRACKS, DIRT CLODS, BUMPS, RIDGES AND GOUGES PRIOR
TO SEEDING; THE SURFACE SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF 1"+ OR -
TO ACCEPT SEED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH SEEDING
OPERATIONS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF THE
GRADED SURFACE. ALL SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED
IN THE SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS.
�
0
N 0600 ARO'%,
6� '�,PNaSc*-.
20�
0
e� 502
�o
�r
Q
LL
U
W00
0
N
X
w
U�
a�
I
I
W°°
N
OD
Qn
Un
00N
C) a
ZZ
0
QW
Q
iE
D_
Q0
z
Q W
w
En<
} 0
in nj
0 N
w
a
�=o
EL
U
W
H
I
U
Q
LL_
17-1
LSI
Z
H
Z
Q
(__)
H
W
Z
Q
W
F-
LL.-
0
W
Iq
W
(y� Cu
�
M J O
1
o �'o
Ln
O
OJ
_ CD
`D
i
me

c-,
OWNER DEVELOPER: ~
BOULDER RETAINING WALL LEGEND ~ o
(SEE SHEET C1) REGIONS BANK Q v - ~
BIORETENTION PLANTING ARRANGEMENT SHOULD w U~
EXISTING TREES BE FIELD ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY BASED ON -NS 111 GREEN STREET, SE H - r ~ Z I GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA 30501 ~ z
TO BE SAVED BUILT CONDITIONS AND DIRECTION k3Y LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. U ~ 770-503-2000 ~ ~ , (>J
~ Q l~ ~
/ - ~ 1-BN SEE DETAIL #8, SHT. C3 TYPICAL BIORETENTION SECTION 4-IG, 6 O.C. P EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED ~ I
. ~ - I ~ 4-IG, 6 O.C. 3 IV, 3-IV, 8' O.C. ~ ~ w ~ W ~ ? o0
/ 3-CS, 8 O.C. \ ~ F- N d ~ 90-DC - X w S 00
1-C{~P 2-CAP, 8 O.C. 90-I 1-ACS = W ~
~ ~ U ~ ~ X
~ - 1-HV--~ X 200-DC ~ ~ 1-HV 60-DC m ~ _ ~ d
~ I - \ / I X PROPOSED LARGE SHADE TREES Q ~ ~ , I-1-
2-NS n z ~ I r--r
20 O.C. X _ W~ ~
X \ ~ i X 1 CAP nn ~ z X X L.L. Q ll7
~ x ~ X . U ~ O Q t--I ~
\ ~ ~ 1-BN " ~ CLJ
X ~ x _ X 1 CAP ~ X • U~ ~ X ~ w o X + PROPOSED SMALL TREES (n N ~ _ I
x I h ~ Q a Q ~D
- - - Z (lJ • Z o W
~ i ~ / • ~ z ~D L~
• X ' \ ~ U Q Q I- O ~ ~ ~ I
PROPOSED SHRUBS J = ~ 00
3 VD X X ~ . 8' O.C. 1-CAP ~ w ClJ a ? z ~
1-ACS ~
GRASS EDGE ~-FP _ W w ~ 1 FP SOD DRAINAGEWAYS GROUNDCOVER W
URB OPENINGS Q - ~ ~ AT C N ~
SOD DRAINAGEWAYS Q ~ U w c--1 + + r ~
AT CURB OPENINGS 3-IV, 8' O.C. + + m N
4-IG, 6' O.C. + + STREAM BUFFER AREA o Q.~ X + + w - " 0
PROPOSED 30' STREAM BUFFER EASEMENT: BIORETENTION PLANTING PLAN - INSTALLATION BY OTHERS) , _MENT: ~ J X Q-o ~
THE EASEMENT SHALL BE 30 FROM TOP OF ST TOP OF STREAM CHANNEL a m w = -
ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREAM. + + a a ? ~ ~ _
SCALE: 1 "=10' + + + + PROPOSED BIORETENTION + + + +
+ + + +
+ + + + + + + ~
BIORETEN110N AREA SPECIFlCAl10NS: (BY OTHERS) BIORElEN11ON ~2 ~2 + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SEE ENLARGED PLAN ~N ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + • • + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - PROPOSED GRASS AREA
SOIL BIORETEN110N 1 ABOVE.
F 4' DI EP SEE ENLARGED PLAN PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM 0 ABOVE. + + + + + + + + + ~"~c + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + ~n + + + + + + + + + + + .
ON A 1' THICK SAND BED. PLACE IN MAXIMUM 18" LIFTS ~ +
AND LIGHTLY COMPACT. BOULDER RETAINING ~ + + ~ WALL (SEE SHT. C1) + + + +
SOIL COMPOSITION SHALL HAVE 10-25% CLAY AND SHALL BE EXISTING TREES , _ T- T - + + + + + ~ F + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
OF A SANDY LOAM OR LOAMY SAND TEXTURE. THE SOIL SHALL TO BE SAVED + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ PROPOSED MULCH EDGE F-~---------- - -
BE CLEAN AND FREE OF HARMFULL SUBSTANCES TO PLANT GROWTH. _ _ _ - _ _ _ ± ± ± ~
T THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + THE SOIL SHALL BE TESTED AND MEE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + +~1+ + + + + + +
pH RANGE - 5.5-6.5 \ T + + + + + + + + 20' ALLY +(UNOPEiVED~ + + + + - ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + t • + + + + + + + + + ~ + + EX1STHd SAN.
ORGANIC MATTER - 1.5-3.0% ~~f OF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + MAGNESIUM (Mg) - 35 LBS/ACRE ~~fXj + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - F + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + EWE LINE SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. H ?
PHOSPHORUS P205 - 100 LBS ACRE ~S~NG ~ ~ + ~ -r , + + + + + + + ( / IRON ~FI(~ N +6 ' ~`l #17 _ + + + + + + + + + + + + + i-~n / + + + + + H ~O~ + ~
POTASSIUM (K20) - 85 LBS/ACRE PIN + + + PIRI + + ~ ~ SEED MIX: HARD FESCUE 250 LB./AC. Q
SOLUBLE SALTS -NOT TO EXCEED 500 PFM ~ ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +5~$ + { ~ CREEPING RED FESCUE 40 LB./AC. C~ F 5~$ + + + + + + + f + ~ FESCUE 10 LB. AC. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ • CHEWINGS /
PERFORM SUITABLE SOIL TESTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PROPOSED + + + + + + F ± ± ± + ± ± + _ - - RYE GRAIN 25 LB./AC.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY FOR BIORETEN110N AREAS) DUMPSTER _ _ _ _ + + _ + ± ENCLOSED BY FENCE ~ 5_FM ~ + + + + + + + + + + + ~ 1 CV + + + + + + + + + + + + + +I + ~>LM MILLET 10 LB. AC. (SPRING -SUMMER ONLY} + + + /
MULCH \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1-INS ~ ~ SEEDING DATES: AUGUST 25 -SEPTEMBER 15, OR MARCH 15 -APRIL 15
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + 1 + + + + _ f~ 1 KL (YEARLY VARIATIONS IN SEEDING DATES MAY VARY DUE TO EXISTING WEATHER PATTERNS.) F-- + + + + + ~ ~ LZ •~Q HPT ~
A 2"-3" MULCH LAYER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON TOP OF THE PLANTING SOIL. + + + + + + 1_~ + + + + THE MULCH SHALL INCLUDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD THAT IS SUITABLY AGED EXISTING ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ OIL TESTS OR APPLY
AND FREE OF FOREIGN MATERIAL AND PLANT MATERIAL. A WELL AGED HOUSE ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ ~ 1-QA SOIL AMENDMENTS: APPLY LIME AND FETILIZER ACCORDING TO S - - u+ + + + ~ I~~ 1 TON DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE PER ACRE, 200 LB. 18 46 0 PER ACRE, H
MULCH IS DEFlNED AS MULCH THAT HAS BEEN STOCKPILED OR STORED + + + + + + + + + + + + + NTHS. + + + + + + + + + ± FOR AT LEAST 12 MO + . • ~ ' P 100 LB. 10-10-10 PER ACRE. H + 0
1-TC + + + ~ • MULCH: HYDROSEED WITH CELLULOSE MULCH AND ADD NETTING ON STEEP SLOPES.
o PLANT MATERIAL • • • W • 5-SBA... 3-FIB ~ . U . •
2-IMBP ~ j + ~ ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM TO 'STANDARDS SET FORTH BY . • . . 3-PJ. v~ . ,
to j.- THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN AND INSTALLED IN A 1=VB -FP GRASS EDGI: . _ _ _ _ _ EDGE Q~ . EXISTING 24° CULV.
WORKMAN LIKE MANNER USING ACCEPTED NURSERY PRACTICES AND 3-IG../ . 3-~ . • a _ . . ~ . - - _
STANDARDS. BOULDER RETAINING 1-~ ~ _ . ® . • - - CALL ULOCO I 1_KC . • - J
WALL SEE SHT. C1 ALL 4 PF.. . PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH THE SAME RELATION TO FINISHED ( ) 3 IGS • ~ . PRIOR TO DIGGING ~
GRADE AS THEY BORE TO EXISTING GRADE Al THE NURSERY. BAR. ~ 2-KCO 1-SBD 60-STELLA D'ORO - 'ORO DRIVE THROUGH ~ - - srEUA o 1-800-632 4949 ~
LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL ROOT BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS PRIOR 2-IG ~ ~3-ICS DAYLILIES, 18" 3-FM.~.. / 1-PAH DAYLILIES, 18" O.C. • • ' • ' .
TO INSTALLATION. - / _ / 8-ICS 7-HFS - ~ GRASS AREA
TERIAL FREE OF PESTS ~ 4-FM ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MA • in ~ . . ~ I I
AND DISEASE. ~ . / t--PF - 1-TC / . , ..y • _ 1 PAH 4.=IGS. . ° ~ .
EXIS .~R~P. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS % nNG S 1-I . 4_ FS . ' ~ I
TO DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER RE4UIREMENTS. • . O
1-PAH fr;BTCP, 3-ICS • ~ ~
PONDED AREA X _sN s-ICs ANNU 4-SBM 9-ICS 1-VP a
THE PONDED AREA SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 6". (N:I:C:) _ _ _ _ _ 5-1VHG 3-KLR 4-AGS i ~lcs -4-AGS 3-RC 1-RHC - - /
TH AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT RUN-OFF DURING SITE 3-ICS 3-MB E _ 3-MB - / 1
_ 1F GRADING. 1-FA 1-FA SBM ~ / 1
3-AGS - E 3-SBD...... 3-AGS 3-H • EXISTING / ~ . .
A PROPER MAINTENANCE PLAN SHALL BE DETERMINED AND IMPLEMENTED 34 D 3-HC ON A REGULAR BASIS. 1 AR , d ° WALK / •
1-KLR 4-KLR 5-LF a. _ . _ . 5-IGS.. ° . a 5-LF • • EXISTING PINS .
3-KLR • 2-1VHG TO BE S9hlED /
a. • „ EXISTING 30 CULVERT 2-ICS . 1=AR 3-SgA... ~ 3-1G. /
3-IVHG. 7 - S . NOTE: 1=SN r-PF 2-sB . _ . _ _ 3~1CS . ~ .
- 1 IG ELAGPOIE 3-KL 1.=IVHG . ' /
3-ICS...' SEE SHEET C7 FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND PLANT LIST. 1 Tc ~ ~ • 3-SBM • ~ 3- 3M.•: 3-AGS 4-RHNZ _ / PROPOSED REGIONS BANK SIGN - FlELD LOCATE
2-1CS... fi=ICS.:... - 3-FM ~ ~ 3-SBM M ~ : • • • SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS)
3=IGS 1-IG a . 2-SBD .S .1.36. ~_.A • /
° . . ° IRON R N / NAIL
• _ NOTE TO SITE CONTRACTOR: BAR • • . • . 1=PF • 7-PF ~ S
. 5 • S • / N COL ' S - . AN UAL OR \
_ _ SIGNATED TO BE • - - • EXISTING TREES THAT ARE DE • • ~ f • 5. S.. _ - L ~ N.LC. 0~ ~~DSC °°'L a ° • / ( ) ~~aO 'may.
SAVED ON THIS DRAWING SHALL BE PROTECTED - • • • • • ! s = . • • o-co BU ED 3 D ED . _ 1+CK... / , GRASS AREA ~ ~o ~1E ~ - _ _ °W 502 ~ =
DURING THE SITE CONSTRUC110N PROCESS BY . • - PRA . NE L BARRICADE AROUND THE - . INSTALLING A SUITAB E • • AGS TANK _ _ _ , y i
T tic.. . TREE OR GROUP OF TREES THAT WILL KEEP EQUIPMEN , -AB 1-CK a es
HICLES MACHINERY PERSONAL ETC. OUT 1 GRASS AREA COLOR sp ~ VE , , ~ ANNUAL ° 1 5N~~1" 6-FM _ - ~ : l i ~ O~° p 1-AB A ~ ' P NuM(~p
FROM UNDER THE DRIP LINE. (Nic)
GRASS AREA GRASS AREA G STREET ~ EXISTING MAPLE - - _ II 11~~ GRASS AREA 1_HpT TO BE SAVED ~ - _
SPRIN i~
1'I-I I S
npAVVI NG
15 11-I~ 0~-0~-2002
GRAPHIC SCALE
pt?Op~p1'Y 0~ BASE INFORMAl10N 20 p 10 20 40 80
-naC ne~-ul-rC~-r
59 bpAWWGS
AN P THIS SITE PLAN WAS PREPARED BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PAUL SCHMITT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. I~ NO 1 O 13F U5~1~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING ROAD EDGES, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND OVERHEAD POWER LOCATIONS CULVERT AND STREAM ALIGNMENTS WERE
TAKEN FROM A PLAT TITLED "REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION" BY SYLVESTER & COMPANY, PA., DRAWING NO. 4254, DATED JUNE 4, 2001 or, ~~~~onuc~n IN FEE" LANI~SC.~~
1 inch = 20 }t.
WITHOUT` N15 Wpl1'1r'F-N AND REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2002.
P F- i--M15510N

- -
PLANTING MIX: PLANTING LIST ~
THE PROPER AMOUNT OF CLEAN AND COMPOSTED ORGANIC MATERI JNT OF CLEAN SOIL (OF SUITABLE TEXTURE) KEY N0. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT ~ [U JRGANIC MATERIAL ALONG WITH FERTILIZER SPACING • ~ O
AND LIME SHALL BE MIXED IN PR( 3E MIXED IN PROPORTIONS AS RECOMMENDED cau~ER ~cNT cauoN ~f U ~
BY A SOILS TEST AND/OR GOOD AND OR GOOD HORTICULTURAL PRACTICE FOR AB 2 ACER BUERGERIANUM TRIDENT MAPLE 8'-10' Bdo6 AS SHOWN W U / I-
EACH PLANT SPEGES. ~ES. AR 6 ACER RUBRUM 'RED SUNSET" RED MAPLE 2 1 2" 12'-14' BdcB z / AS SHOWN =
CK 2 CORNUS KOUSA 'MILKY WAY SELECT' MILKY WAY DOGWOOD 8'-10' B&B AS SHOWN
CV 1 CHIONANTHUS LARgNICUS WHITE FRINGETREE 8'-10' BdcB AS SHOWN ~ ~ , N . ~ Q FA 2 FRANKLINIA AUTAMAHA FRANKIJNIA 8-10' Bd8
BRANCHING NOTE ON STAKING: STAKING AND GUYING ARE TO BE U ~I
HEIGHT _ INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT WINDY LOCAl10NS AND SOIL DRAINAGE; w FP 3 FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS' GREEN ASH 2 1/2 12'-14 Bdc6 AS SHOWN 1 . 1 ~ L~ ~ QR 2 QUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK 2 1/2" 12'-14' BdcB AS SHOWN LJJ O W d nn
(A.A.N. STANDARD) SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY DONE. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE ~N J lV CTOR SHALL DETERMINE IF THE PLANTING AREAS ARE QA t QUERCUS ACUTISSIMA SAWTOOTH oAK 2 t/2" 12'-14' BbB AS SNOWN - X 1.~1 S ~
AND GUY, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND WIRES THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL DE' SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WELL DRAINED OR IF UNDERDRAINAGE IS )ERDRAINAGE IS REQUIRED. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT TC 3 TSUGA CANADEN~S CANADIAN HEMLOCK 8'-10' B&B 15' O.C. I W ~
THE SOIL HOLDS WATER AND PROPER DF RUBBER HOSE PRESSURE TREATED GOOD PLANT HEALTH, THE GENERAL CON AND PROPER DRAINAGE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED FOR ~ U ~1 ~ x IE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFlED _
SECURED WITH 2X2 STAKE AND A PLAN TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM 'THE PROBLEM WILL BE ADDRESSED. ~ ~ ~ d
NUMBER 12 GAUGE (3 STAKES PER TREE) I ~ AGS 18 AZALEA 'gRARD'S SCARLET' AZALEA (gRARD) 3 GAL CONT. 3' O.C. Q ~
PLIABLE GALVANIZED WIRE BTCP 6 BERBERIS THUNBERgI 'CRIMSON PYGMY DWARF BARBERRY 3 GAL CONT. 3' O.C. ~ H
CD 10 COTONEASTER DAMMERI BEARBERRY COTONEAS 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. W N
GRADE AT WHICH ~ Z FM 27 FOTHERgtLA MAJOR 'MT. AIRY' FOTHERgLU 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. ~ " Q
TREE GREW HAA 3 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA 3 GAL T. 4' O.C. Q H ~o
AT NURSERY HPT 6 HYDRANGEA PANICUUTA 'TARDIVA' TARDIVA HYDRANGEA 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C. ~ ~ (lf Ur ~
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH PROPOSED TREE PLANTING (SEE TREE PLANTING DETAIL) HQ 3 HYDRANGEA QUERCILFOUA OAKLEAF HYDRANGEA 3 GAL CONT, 5' O.C. c0 W O
SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX PREPARED PLANTING SOIL 3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH H it HYPERICUM FR M ' RST T, ' 0.. " ' N ~ - FS ONDOSU SUNBU ST. JOHN'S WORT 3 GAL CON 3 C Q ICS 58 ILIX CRENATA 'ST01(ES' STq(E5 HOLLY 3 GAL CONT. 3' O.C. ~ a
Z IG 20 ILEX GUBRA INKBERRY HOLLY 5 GAL CONT. 6' O.C. Z p W
IGS 15 ILEX GLABRA 'SHAMROCK' SHAMROCK HOLLY 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. ~ DETAIL Q a I- O
MIRIFl 140N FlLTER FABRIC PROPOSED SHRUB PLANTINGS (SEE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL) - I=~ 11- ) v I IMBP 2 ILEX MESERVAE 'BLUE PRINCE' BLUE PRINCE NOLLY 7 GAL 8' O.C. ~ (11
-III (COMPLETELY WRAP WASHED STONE) SOIL SAUCER -USE TOPSOIL PREPARED - - TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET ~ ~ W j INS 1 ILD(X NEWE R. ST"VENS NEWE STEVENS HOLLY 5'-6' B&B AS SHOWN ~ ?
PLANTING MIX = PEEL BACK TOP ~ CONC. CURB & GUTTER = IVHG 11 ITEA VIRGINICA 'F~NRYS GARNET' LARgNIA SNEETSPIRE 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. ~ Z _ CQ
-I I ~ I- - ~ _ 1/3 OF BURLAP SLOPE FOR =1 ~ i-I I - I I- TYPICAL ALL DRAINAGE DRAINAGE - • - ( ASPHALT PAVING ~ KL 2 KALMIA UTIFOLIA MOUNTAIN UUR0. 0`-38' BdrB 8' O.C. vj ~
- - SLOPE FOR I I-III ' I- B&B PLANTS) r W ~ KLO 2 KALMIA UTIF0UA 'OLYMPIC FlRE' HYBRID MT. LAUR0. 3 GAL BdcB 5' O.C. w ~ Q -
- - - - --I \ \ \ - -I = I =1 I I I I -I \i\i\i\i \r\r\i\i\ r\rr\rr\rr\r r\i\r\i\i -II.-.III rrrrr KLR 14 KALMIA UTIFOUA 'ROYAL DWARF' HYBRID MT. UUR0. 3 GAL B&B 3' O.C. r=/i ~
I-I~-II-~~~_II ~ ~ , ,~-D° ri ri ri ri ri ri r ri ri ri ri r r r lF 5 LEUCOTHOE FONTANESIANA DROOPING LEUCOTHOE 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. V W } ~
MINIMUM MB 3 MAHONIA BEALEI LEATHERLEAF MAHONIA 3 GAL CONT. 5' O.C. 0]
r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ / r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ r/ \r\r\r\r\r\r\r\ \r\ \ \ \ r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\\ od.~ X PJ 3 PIERIS JAPONICA JAPANESE ANDROMEDA 3 GAL CONT. 5' O.C. LJ . N 0
12 MINIMUM \ \ r rr rr rr rr rr rr rr ~ rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr DEPTH PREPARED r\r\r\r\r\r\r\ r\r\r\~\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\~\~\r PF 14 POTENTILU FRUTICOSA BUSH CINQUffgL 3 GAL CONT. 3' O.C. ~ _J x Q.O
PLANTING MIX \\r\\r\\ \\r rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr rr r r rr r RC 3 RHODODENDRON CALENDUUCEUM FUME AZALEA 0"-36' BBB fi' O.C. d. m W = _
COMPACT TO PREVENT \r\r\r\r\r\r\ \r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r \ RHN2 4 RHODODENDRON HYBRIDA 'NOVA ZEMBLE' HYBRID RHODODENDRON 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. p' O 1 d. ~ 0_ _
SETTLEMENT rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr \r\r\r\r\r\r\ \r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r r\r \\r\\ RHC RHODODENDRON HYBRIDA 'CHINOIDES' HYBRID RHODODENDRON 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C. SBA 8 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER' ANTHONY WATER SPIREA 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C.
/r /r /r /r / / /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r /r / TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL \r\r\r\r\ \ \r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r\r r SN 8 SP~tAEA NIPPONICA 'SNOWMOUND' SNOWMOUND SPIREA 3 GAL CONT. 4' O.C.
58D 20 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'DOLCHK;A' DOLCHICA SP~EA 3 GAL CONT. 3' O.C.
N.T.S. SBM 14 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'MAdC CARPET MAJIC CARPET 5PIREA GAL CONT. 3' O.C.
3/4° WASHED STONE 12" DEEP VB 2 LABURNUM X BURKWOODII BURKWOOD LABURNUM 5 GAL CONT. 6' O.C.
VP 1 VIBURNUM X PRAGENSE PRAGUE VIBURNUM 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C. I
PROPOSED 4" DIA. 5LOTTED DRAIN PIPE m
~ DE 34 DRYOPTFTtIS FRYTHROSORA AUTUMN FERN QUART CONT. 16" O.C. w ~ P 1
~ l_A
PREPARED SUBSOIL -COMPACT TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT m w
~ PAH 4 PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 'HAMELN' DWARF FWNTAIN gTASS 1 GAL CONT. AS SHOWN I--- ` a J
PLANT ISLAND UNDERDRAINAGE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE 60 HEIEROCAWS HYBRDA STELU D'ORO DAYI.ILY 1 GAL CONT. 18' O.C. W
GRADING CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL PLANT ISLANDS THAT CONTAIN
IMPERVIOUS SOILS THAT HALL NOT ALLOW PROPER DRAINAGE FOR PLANT GROWTH AND HEALTH. ~ ~
H
BRANCHING NOTE ON STAKING: STAKING AND GUYING ARE TO BE HEIGHT INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT WINDY LOCATIONS AND h-i
(A.A.N. STANDARD) SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY DONE. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE
AND GUY, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND WIRES BIORETENTION AREA PLANT LIST - (BY OTHERS)
SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. TYPICAL PARKING LOT PLANT ISLAND KEY NO. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT SPACING
RUBBER HOSE N.T.S. CAIPER HEIGHT GALLON
SECURED WITH PRESSURE TREATED NUMBER 12 GAUGE 2X2 STAKE
PLIABLE GALVANIZED WIRE (3 STAKES PER TREE) NOTE ON STAKING: STAKING AND GU11NG ARE TO BE ACS 2 AMEUNCHIER CANADENSLS SHADBIAW SERLACEBERR 8'-10' BdcB AS SHOWN
INSTALLED ONLY AS NECESSARY AT WINDY LOCATIONS AND w BN 2 BETUU NIGRA RIVER BIRCH 2 1/2' 12'-14' BBB AS SHOWN H FP 1 FRAXMKJS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS' GREEN ASH 2 1/2 12'-14 B&B AS SHOWN I---I
TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET SHOULD NOT BE ROUTINELY DONE. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STAKE NS 3 NYSSA SYLVAIICA BUCK TUPELO 2 1/2" 12'-14' B~CB AS SHOWN
PEEL BACK TOP AND GUY, CARE SHOULD 8E TAKEN TO PROTECT BARK AND WIRES 1/3 OF BURLAP GRADE AT WHICH SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. I ` ~ I
(TYPICAL ALL TREE GREW L.LJ CAP 6 CLETHRA ALIFOUA 'PINK SPIRES' CLETHRA 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C.
AT NURSERY RUBBER HOSE SECURED B&B PLANTS) 4MTH #12 GUAGE PLIABLE ~ m CS 3 CORNUS STOLONIFERA RED OSIER DOGWOOD 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C.
CORNER OF ROOT SYSTEM TO BE AT LINE OF GALVANIZED 4KRE. ~ HV 1 HAMAMELIS VRGfNANA COMMON WITCIIHAZ0. 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C. x
ORIGINAL GRADE ~ IG 12 ILEX GLABRA INKBERRY HOLLY 5 GAL CONT. 6' O.C.
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH \ / ~ ~ IV 8 ILEX VERTiC~.I.ATA COMMON WINTERBQtRY 5 GAL CONT. O.C. I
~ PRESSURE TREATED FIRMLY FORM SAUCER USE TOPSOIL 2X2 STAKE VD 3 VIBURNUM OENTATUM ARROWWOOD LABURNUM 7 GAL CONT. 8' O.C. -1 N
( ) TAKES PER TREE ANGLE OF REPOSED VARIES WITH STEEPNESS (3 S ) W
PREPARED OF SLOPE AND SOIL TYPE. ~ DC 350 DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA TUFTED HAIRGRASS QUART CONT. 18" O.C. a Q!
PLANTING MIX //VA//VA// ~ //VA \ c~
SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX
\ GRADE AT WHICH
\//V/~~/ V// //V//V//V//~\ V//\ TREE GREW AT NURSERY GENERAL NOTES
3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED IMTH SAME RELATION TO FlNISHED GRADE AS IT BORE TO EXISTNG GRADE AT NURSERY.
12" MINIMUM
DEPTH PREPARED 2. PRUNE NEWLY PLANTED TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD HORTUCULTURAL PRACTICE TO PRESERVE NATURAL CHARACTER OF PLANT. PRUNING SHALL BE DONE WITH CLEAN, SHARP TOOLS.
PLANTING MIX I
COMPACT TO PREVENT _ - _ : I = -I I ~ TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET - -I: SETTLEMENT - - REMOVE TOP 1/3 3. B&B PLANT MATERIAL -COMPLETELY REMOVE WIRE BASKETS AND AFTER PLANT IS PLACED IN HOLE, CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP
I- PREPARED A. OF BURLAP -I I FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL.
TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL ON SLOPE PLANTING MIX {~{N li 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE FULLY GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR FROM FNAL ACCEPTANCE.
.I I N.T.S. ( ~ ~ 1= 12" MIN. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A WORKMAN LIKE MANNER USING ACCEPTED NURSERY PRACTICES AND
- - ~ STANDARDS.
-1 ~ I-~ I I~ I.~ I I I 6. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM TO STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
NOTE ON SLOPE PLANTING: COMPACTED i I-Ili ~ i ~ PLANTING MIX
SHRUB AND EVERGREEN TREE PLANTINGS ON SLOPE ARE SIMILAR TO ABOVE DETAIL FOR TREE PLANTING ON SLOPE. 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FlNDING OUT WHERE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THEM DURING PLANTING.
TYPICAL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL 8. EXCAVATION NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE CAREFULLY DONE BY HANG.
3° CLEAN SHREDDED PINE N.T.S. LAWN AREA SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH 10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE TO ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK.
GRADE AT WHICH PLANTING OR MULCHED AREA TREE GREW 11. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL ROOT BOUND CONTAINER GROWN PLJWTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
SAUCER OF PLANTING MIX AT NURSERY 12. ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEEASE.
MULCH WITH 3" ,~N CARS 13. PLANT BEDS, NOT SHOWN AS LAWN AREAS, SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 3° OF CLEAN, FRESH, & WELL SEASONED SHREDDED ~°°°°°pNDS°°°~i~~';
CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK TOTALLY REMOVE WIRE BASKET PLANTS ~o°p~' Cgcp;L PINE BARK MULCH. ;
_ PEEL BACK TOP W = _ oa; ° ° 14. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUAN1111ES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, BEFORE PRICING THE or 5OZ ~
I I I; -1 = ~ ~ I,~ 1 3 OF BURLAP 3" CLEAN SHREDDED PINE BARK MULCH o I ~-III=` - - / ~I~I - WORK. y oN ~
I ~ I, TYPICAL ALL h, I I, I ~I I ~I I I_ - ( ~ I - i ° i7 e°° ~~r
- B&B PLANTS) PREPARED TOPSOIL -I -II.::;:.:;;:.;.;:.:::. 6' MIN. DEPTH ~ - _ g 1I - EXISTING GRADE 15. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBE FOR CONDUCTING SOIL TESTS TO DETERMINE LIME & FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS. °°°~:~,1~;;~ p,~ NLIM[~p 1NG GRADE ~'~,p p.~~`
- - PREPARED ~ OR GRADE OF RADE OF 16. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO S IW,~~`
I S 6" MIN, =1 I `-I ~ NOTES: PLANTING AREA i ~ PLANTING MIX _ _ /r - - TING AREA FINAL BUILT CONDITION.
• 1. TRENCH EDGER DETAIL SHALL nt?AWING-,III: ~ I I= COMPACTED ~ BE USED AT ALL LAWN EDGES & 17. PROPOSED TREES IN GRASSED AREAS SHALL HAVE A 6 DIAMETER MULCH RING INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE TRUNK. ~
_ _ I I I~ I I_ I I I i I J I-III I I _
1 rN~ PLANTING MIX ~-lc ® EDGES OF MULCHED AREAS 18. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE IF THE PLANTING AREAS ARE WELL DRAINED OR IF UNDERDRAINAGE IS REQUIRED. ~;'v7w
3" FOR CONTAINMENT PI?Or rPIT' or 6" MIN. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE SOIL HOLDS WATER AND PROPER DRAINAGE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED FOR GOOD PLANT HEALTH, THE O~-04-2002
GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND A PLAN TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM WILL BE ADDRESSED.
TNT Af?CHI-lr-C-r 2. TRENCH EDGER SHALL CREATE EARTH SUBGRADE A CLEAN SEPARATION BETWEEN
ANn N01'1'0 13F U5Fn TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL AREAS WITH SMOOTH, EVEN ONES
O N.T.S. TYPICAL GROUND COVER PLANTING (AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS). r: r?r-I~I?ObLICr-n 511 PpMVINC15
WITHOUT H15 MITTEN N.T.S. TRENCH EDGER DETAIL N.T.S.
PF- P--M15510N

Nolsslwd~~
~l OZ = qam t N~-~-i~,~nn sIH ~-no~-IM
(J.SI~M) zooz 's AaYnae3~ O3su~3a ONY Q~~nGlOdd~d d0
S~NIM~Q CIS LOOZ `ti 3Nnf 431Y0 `~lis 'ON 9NWIYa(1 `'Vd 'ANYdW00 ~P a31S3n1~15 A8 .NOl1Ya0da00 ItlIONtlNl3 SNOp3a„ 0311tL 1Wld V WOad N3NVl
0' 6~b6~-Z~9-008- L S ONY 1a3n1n0 `SNOIlY00l a3MOd OY3H2133n0 ONY a3M3S aYlINYS N YONn08 ua3d0ad Q~n 0~ ~ON QN~ 3a3M S1N3WN911Y WY3al A 9 l1SIX3 S39O3 OYOa 9NI1SIX3 Aa
C~' ~ o~ o ~ ONI0014 Ol d01dd ZO~~O~gO~ N91S3O ldan10311H0aY llIMHOS lnVd A 301n0 NYId IS SI -~'~~'IN~~ OIOn1S 8 0 ad NOIlYW210dN1 OIHdY2pOd01 NO O3SY8 03aYd3ad SYM 31 Hl
~0 ~d~dOdd
ZOOZ-~b0 ~0 ~d d ~'I~~S OIHd~2i0 ~~o~~CT RF`^e N011'dWa03Nl 3SV8 S~
,c o~ oz ~os~
_ ~ ~e a _ Z05 ~NIMddQ
_ e~ SINJ-
~,e 0` d
~ 1p N~.
- - - -
A30N39NYl
3nan0 d0 1NIOd lY a3lln9 ~ 8af10 ON3
11X3 ~ A2llN3 8~oi8~
3~1~ NOIlOf1a1SN00 43ZI118`d1S L~~nNI
- ~~2 i _ 3815 03AOW3d 38 lldHS
1N3W3A'dd 9NIlSIX3
~ _ S3NIl
r, _ - _ _ _ i (ZO '1HS 'Z~ 11tl130 33S) ~ 'j _ _ ~ a3MOd Otl3Ha3A0 a311n9 ~P 9an0 11Y13O 33S) 1 32ll 9NIadS 3104 unun 311f10 ~ aano 3 9Nl1SIX3 31YOOl3a
- ~n ' - - _ ~ a3sodoad 03SOd0ad
7,~~ ? 5 19f1H 'AYM39YNIYaO
P _ sa~ods g ~y ~ _ sa~ods g 21311n0 'ON00 3OIM ,Z 55'~ 18~='A313
I ~ a 3lOHNVW 30 401
- - ~ 6~ 'W'8'1
P° _ _ - _ ~ . . _ . C-'~ - ~ r. s 31od unlin
~ , - o 5 - - ~ i ~ T. _ . _ . _ . _ 031YOOl3a 03sodoad
_-13
000Z-ADS-OLL IItlN s ~ ~ \ ~ _ ~ 3 . . > I Noa
1050 d1~~030 3llI~S3NId0 tlMS ' ~ • ~ ~ ~ ' . e 5£, l.s' S 5
N a~nla v~ ~ [8E / 3S 133N1S N33N~ kll 9~ ad ~ i
~iNb`8 SN0103~ ~ 0 mN i ~d ~ ~ cn , ~ s~Fi o`~i . a~~r .
\ d'~ _ D o ~ _ c~i L.£l _ . .
~~3dOl3A3a/~3NM0 ~ - _ - S33a1 9N11SIX ~ ~i8~..,~:. . . J. _
~ 3ltlMS tlNltl •yt Obl ` _ 1a3n1n0 .0£ 9NIlSIX3
~ a _ f03AtlS TitlHS) _ - - - - ,9ti1=H19N31
~~Z S'£l 211.9NI1SIX3 ~ 11 ldA0W3d ~ '1NPYltd ilYHd. / ~ Wb'3d1S 03SOdOdd
21 ~ _ = ~ ~oola 1nONtl310 3Nil NItlaO d00a • i - ~t
O ~ HStllds 'ON00 _ tr'Zl tlNitla _a0.~. (1tl01dAl) 1n0-Ntl370 b'~l 9 .£l . _ . - _ _ 1Y01du
NOI1tl001 1nOdSNM00 J ONI d0 9 0 ,tr 3Nn Nltlao ~ooa ~ ~ ` ~ 1n0 NY310 NIYaO d00a 0'bt a3lln9 ~ 8an0
S3NIl NIVaO d00a OAd Otr 'HOS 9 03SOd0ad - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ NOQtl00l 1nOdSNM00 i 0 '1NWnd :4 VHdStl ('du) ~
NOLLtlA313 1ltlM d0 d01 03SOd0ad 0'£l=Ml S3NIl NItlaO d00a ~ I NIYaO d00a
0 0J1d Otr HOS ~9 . .d 0~ HOS .9
~ y 3lOd ONtl 3NIl a3MOd OV3Ha3A0 9NI1SIX3 - - - - _ ~ + 0'908£='3'I lb '1HS 33S
c~ 310HNtlW ~ 3NIl a3M3S Aatl11NVS 9NI1SIX3 - S - - ~ ~ 0~918~ _ 'A313 .d.d ~ /w, 03~0`d1S 3NIHOb'W
~ _ 9NIOllf18 ~NdB saola~. Nd8 Sd01031d30131N1 lY ~ 5£18£-A3l YM
I ~ ltl0IdA1 9NIN NOadtl 3NO1S 1311n0 3dld la - a311n9 ~ 8an0 a3SOd0~d 9NIN3d0 8an0 Odd ~ ' . i... lldM 9NINI'dl3d d301f108
H ~ ~ _ 03SOdOdd . .
9'tt_ . ~'lL ~
8tld 3NIl a3AA3S ~ _ N0110310ad NIStlB Fp1tl0 Ola ~ (6 L08£-'A313 'ANI £0 '1HS z 'NVS 9NI1SIX3 Z << ~ b~ 11tl130 33S NISV9 HOltlO y
) ltl 1311n0 NIVaO d00a Wtl0 ~03H0 3NOlS Aatla0dW31 / 8' H9n0aH1 3AIa0 ~ _ . Q
pp~~ 8'8088 ~~NI ~ _ .
V ~ Olt 1~3~NI ~ OtlAH 30N3~ 1 _ - kk8E 309 soz = szn (sue ) y~~ .
lIS a-l7-o - f _ o- ~ _ , c11 i.. '3dO1S ,L l
p-~ 'Aln~.trZ 9N 5'£ G ..cn n .ns. ; l J OflA. _ ~ lVflb3 a0 (aN 311U13HSb') OOIIIM o .z i... 311 ~
3NI1 anO1N00 03SOd0ad ~ S i~~'1~30 131NL kV / ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . . ..W . £l8£ ~NIN3d0. 9bf~~ . . d.H . m / . / 3 3 W0213 03ZINIWfII'd Z 3dJ11. 4400 l X 5 ~ _ . 0`~Js ~
M-I ~ M-1 ' l t ~ ;r. - - - d.. _ ~ ~ dWb HOdd 'b9 Zl ' S5 X ~L 30 OZl /r.i ~~1. r a ~
SNOLLVA3l3 lOdS 03SOd0ad Z ~ ~,C.. ,mot--~+ . tr'Oi.. tr•0~ ~ + + k ~ ~ ~ 11 ~Q - - - - - - + ~1d3111f10 03SOdOdd
m + + + + + + + + ~
1 ~ 1 ~ d ~ ~ + + + + ~ o 1 + + + + E~+ + + + ~ ~gE + + + + ~ ~ tx
NoIlN313a019 03SOdoad 608 ~ t ~ + + + + + + + ~ NO~~ , 3g1 + + + ~ + + ~ NOV81~ 3SnOH
PEE ~ N ~ ~ + + + +
I~ ~ ~ Q ~ 6'Ol + + + + + + + + + \ W + + + + + + + + + • + + + + ~ + + ~ 9NI1SIX3 + + + + '~08£~ 3' ~ ~ d~ / - , 015
+ + 5+ + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
+ + E~~ ~ ~ 6~'Ol £='A 1 NI 3 ~ ~ tl3atl NOl1tla01S3a Wtl3a1S 03SOd0ad + + + + + 5~'Ol$£=' W - - - ~ (O3nYS 38 1lYHS)
+ + + + + ~ + + + + + ,~31~1 8~no + . ~ 3 ONYH) ,r + , , ~ ` S33211 9NIiSiX3 ~ 31YMS
+ + d ~ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 ~ NOIS213nIO + + + + + + + + + + . Nid
+ Flo
+ + + + + + NHS+`8ltb'13F] 3~S) + + + + + + 9NU1tld 11tlHdStl 03SOd0ad , ; + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + +NItl~Oa~ONfh + + + + + + + +
+ + + Q~08fi=' ' + + + + + + + + (03NOONVBV ~1311~ + + + +
~ ~ ,flZ ~ + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + + + ~ 3dOlS 1114 d0 301 rfv~o~~a
~o ~ ~ ~ + ~ + , 6'508£='n313 'nNl
~ Z -gyp S33a1 9NI1SIX3 ~ + " ° + + + + + + , ' ~
o - D + +w+~+ + + +cl+ + + + + + + + + + + ~ + + + + + 131NI 8an0
~ - ~ ,
~ ~ (£0 '1HS 81IY130 33S)
• ~ ~ + + + + + + + s % ~ 60 'AI s0 - 'nNl, £0 '1H5 SNIYa0a30Nn IY130 33S) 8 HOlYO
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ Q1~ + + + + + + + + + d~ + + + ~ Itl130 3~S) ~ y 3ltlMS 39VNIVaO 03SOd0ad 3 + + + + + i+ + + + + ~ 1V n0 N lY n0 NIYaO 40021
_ + + + + + + +r+ + + + + ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ + + + + + + i~+ + N t~ + dS 006-Y3aY 30YdanS WnWINIW
~ _ / ~ ~ ~ i / (k0 ~ fTl (ltlAa3lNl ,Z) anOlN00 9NllSIX3 + + + % + + + r {~0 '1HS 33S) 9'118£='n313 Woiloe (£0 133HS 8# 1IY13O 33S)
~ ~ z + + " ~+o + + + + ~ 0'£ l8£='A313 llt B£='A313 lldM 30 401 (Sa3Hl0 J~8) - L# NOLlN313d018
fU ~ ~ ~t +3i+„+',~, + + ~ i (43NOb'1S ON3931 , (03NOb'1S 3NIHObW)
DO ~ ~ + + / ll'dM 9NINIb!13~ ~341f109 rv r- - / a3SOdOdd (s~o s'£=9zo) 3a 4301(109 lY ONOI ,z£
o ~ ~ ~ # + + i ~ ~ 3 doa .st •doad
Ul Q~ z o ~ -_i . + i 3~~~ sdo s'a=sao ~l ~ Z ( ) ~ sz=9zo>
~ z NOIld~Ol3a \ x~'tr ltl oNOI ,a£ ~ oNOI ,z£ p8t 'd0ad
~ ~ D D ~ YVV3~1S 43SOd0ad ~ ~ doa psi 'load I - ~ oo z= t
(n ° ° O ~ f''Tf'l~ ~ `(A`J /V
~ H ~ HlaoN dVNI ~411NpIA o~ ~ D
~ Q D ds oo9-tl3atl 3otlaans Wrn 1Y 30YdanS WnWINIW
^ ~ ~ 6'608£='A313 WO Z ~ I 38'8 1 (/j ~ ~ ~mJ ,~g2 (£0 133HS 8# 1Itl130 '608£='n313 Woll08 33HS 9# 1IY130 33S)
H ~--I- z tia~ y (S~3H10 ~8) - Z# NOLLN313~ NOLLN313d018
~ ~ / ~ '9NIOO38 ONY ONIlln0a30Nn a3d0ad a0d
i ds ~ SN011Y013103dS 301n0ad ONY Y3aY 3H1 103dSNl TIYHS a33N19N3 1Y01NH031030 Y
X = ~ ~ 2 'OOla3d NOIlYllYlSNI 3Hl 9NIan0 031034X3 SI NIYa ON N3HM OOla3d a3HlY3M 1,a0 Y ONIanO O3l1YlSNl 38 11YHS (dW0 HOaY) la3nln3 WY3211S 03SOd0ad 3H1
C 3Ntll g01 C ~ x = SlaatlH ~
DO 5 fTl - •p~i N N •ON ~ 'NOIlYlIIS ~ NOISOa3 ONISnYO 'd3H01H ,S'0 SI 84(10 30 401 Woa~ 031N3n3ad 3sw~a3HLO 210 '03a3noo 'O3S010 38 1lYHS S3HON3a1 '84(10 30 3SV8 3db' b3llf19 ~ 9dflb 1'd SN011'dA313 lOdS 03S 4044
f1) ~S~o ~ Q ~ ~ y `031034X3 SI NIYa N3HM 'SOOla3d NIYa 9NIanO N3d0 NIYW3a lON IIYHS S3HON32t1 0
~ ~1 3X S ~ 'a31Y3a9 SI a3n3H01HM 1000N 3H1 a0 SONY1H91H d0 NMOl 3H1
I Q 1~ ! 13N3AVa ~Hb Ul D ~'o )HOB d0 S1N3W3alnb3a 3H1 H1W1 AldW00 IIYHS S3an0300ad ONY 'SlYla31YW `~210M llY
nn ll Ul ~ \'~0 N .r IV v ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ w'd3~1S 3H1 . 3~1S 3Hl ~0 S3aiS Hl 8 NO '„e„ ssYlo 3e llYHs Q HOIHM 9NInYd a30Nn 1430X3 (AaYNIOaO) .0. SSYlO 38 1lYHS 9NI0038 3414 'SN011'd013103dS aNb S11d130
I z H ~ y~ - ~0 ~ s ~3NNb'HO Wb'32llS ~0 d01 WO~~ ,0~ 38 llb ,0~ 38 ll'dHS 1N31N3Sd3 3Hl 39VNI'dba ON'd l0a1N00 NOISOd3 a0d ~0 133HS 33S
•n~inN asutNauio scaiNn •nnw niNSdv air wild ni ']NI(i}If1.'f'1H
. ' m D ...~3aan ' ~11V~YV~Snj tlii~l la YYn~~ Lidl la Y -Idl5 ~Uk: UdSUdUtld WOO) 3dId 313a0N00 030b03NI3a £ SSb'l0 39 IIVHS Sb3M3S VYbO1S a03 3dld
O -I x~
FO :S3dld 30VNIV80 03SOdO8d
I~J3ANI

2" X B" 2" X 8" d~
FACE OF CURB CAP BOARD 6" X 6" 6'-0" O.C. MAX. CAP BOARD POST ~ ~
PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS ~ ~q ~
IN CONCRETE CURB. 1" X 8" ,PRIM - - _ ~ (lJ ~ I- O
1" X 8° TRIM PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS 6 BOARD ! ~ s ~ - BOARD TRIM U Q ~
NOT TO EXCEED 50', AT THE ENDS AND MID-POINT " 1'-O° 6 X 6 ~ ~ W d- F-- _
OF RETURNS AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. POST ~ H z q =
1"X6" ASPHALT PAVEMENT i" X 6" ~0 30ARDS ~ U
" VERTICAL BOARDS _ _ VERTICAL BOARDS 5 1 RADIUS - - - ~ ~ ~ (1J I-' Q ~
I ~ ' i 1 1/2" RADIUS 5'-0" - - - Ln ~ V ~ i
- 2° X 6" STRINGERS 2" X 6" STRINGERS-BACK SI W ~ ~ ~ ~ INGERS-BACK SIDE OF FENCE o ? d
6" ~ ~ ATTACH TO POSTS MATH DAC 'OSTS MATH DADOED JOINTS. (GALV. ANGLES NEEDED AT CORNERS) ~ I- N ~ q - X W S 00
- ~ ~ 1 X 4 TRIM FINISHED GRADE
- ~ a a BOARD - - - _ t D ~ ~ =w H A E PROPOSED PLANTINGS ? ~
6" ~i 4 a 7" ~ Q D - - - - . ~ U ~ x A SEE SHEET C6 -LANDSCAPE PLAN H =
- o a - _ - 0 4" CLEARANCE ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~a I
d 4' - ~ a Q~ ~ ,LL ~ n z
~ q ~ INLET DEFLECTOR: (3' WIDE) ~ H FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER VJ N ~
- - CABC a POST ANCHOR: TYPICAL " " PROPOSED BOULDER ~ TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO ~ z
- a ( ) i X 4 TRIM 3000 PSI CONC. - - USP TIMBER CONNECTORS BOARD RETAINING WALL ~ ~ q a Q ~ BIORETENTION BASIN. U ~
CURB & GUTTER - - - - 3'-0" HEAVY COLUMN BASE IIII- 3000 PSI CBE66 12 GAUGE SLOPE TOP OF FTG. FOR DRAINAGE (SEE SHT. Ct) Q ~ O n ~ N
~ a CONC. FTG. TYPICAL NAGE U ~ ~ ~ ao W O
1'-6" ~ _ I MAXIMUM PONDED WATER PROPOSED GRADE Q a Q `D
COMPACTED SUBGRADE OUTSIDE FACE OF ENCLOSURE -ELEVATION PROPOSED GRADE DEPTH - 6" Z
Z~ W ~ 3:1 MAX. CURB OPENING _ ~D In
ASPHALT PVMNT. Q a ~ O U
J (U 00 soo ~ ~
(DRAINAGE TOWARDS CURB) 1.-6" 2" X 4" TRIM BOARD RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF ORAINAGEWAY o ? ~
~ z CO 6" MAX. N/y N (Y
SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" PLYWOOD) SECTION VIEW LL IIII-~IIli~llll = W W
3/4" PLYWOOD - - - - - a ' o ~ - ~ =1I I I I-111 I I-11 I I ~111I ICI I- -1I I I I_I I I I ICI I I I-1I I I~ N~
FACE OF CURB BACKING 2"X4"CAP " " IIII~III ~IIIIJIIII~ I~IIIIJIIII~II - - -IIII =_=_-_=1111 ~ W
t X6 VERTICAL BOARDS IIII III ~IIIII VIII- IIII~Iiill_III - - m N
PROVIDE CONTRACTON JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS 6" 6" X 6" POST - - ' - - - - - - - - " Illli IIIII~ 00-^ X _ I~IIII - - W ~ N O
2 X 4 TRIM BOARD IN CONCRETE CURB. ~I I I I I I I_I I I I I I I I ~ J x
1'_0' - - - - - - - - - - - -RIP TO SIZE (SHALL COVER EDGE OF PLYWOOD) PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS AT INTERVALS 11111= IIII=1 I-11111 a m 4' " MI . - - W=
NOT TO EXCEED 50', AT THE ENDS AND MID-POINT PLAN VI A EDGE OF GATES 11111 II-IIII VIII= ~ o
OF RETURNS AND AT RIGID STRUCTURES. EW T GATE " " 1 X 8 TRIM BOARD 11111- 11111=1 = a a a ~ _ I-11111 - PLANTING SOIL ~
5" 1" RADIUS I ASPHALT PAVEMENT -11111 I~IIIII _ -I SEE SHEET C6 -LANDSCAPE PLAN
1 1 2" RADIUS 2" X 4" CAP 10'-6" O.C. / 11111= I I ~ 1~ 1111 FOR BIORETENTION AREA SPECIFICATIONS
- 1"X6" 2"X4"CAP - 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD ~I I I I I I I=11111 11111=
6„ iii-- 4 VERTICAL BOARDS " " I I I I a~ 6 X 6 POST IIIII~ I=11111 " " = 1'-0" MIN... = SAND BED x s PosT I-11111 -
- --..y t' X 8" TRIM BOARD _ IIII ~ I-IIII
I ~ ~ T-HIN E 3 A Q " " G ( E -T-HIN E 3 A H D x-1111 11~1~11~1~11~11_I 1111 1111~1111~11~11111 11111 G ( E C ~ E) _ - - - - -
- D a 6" 1 X 6 VERTICAL - " III~IIII~IIII_II E o ~l II- - - _
' a BOARDS - 1" X 6" DIAGNOL I X 6" DIAGNOL BRACE II ~ U
a a a 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD , 4" = 111 UNDERDRAIN (SEE SHT. C4, GRADING PLAN FOR LOCATION - )
4 -0" BEYOND - 4 PERFORATED PIPE IN WASHED STONE BED WRAPPED IN
_ 1" X 8" TRIM BOAT - CABC - F1l1ER FABRIC MIRIFI 140N . SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT. X 8 TRIM BOARD i -6 MIN. ( )
3000 PSI CONC. ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , 3/4" PLYWOOD d CURB & GUTTER _ 1'_6~~ -I I BACKING ~ , BIORETENTION AREA
- FlNISI FlNISHED GRADE ~ ~
u " i~
1 X 4 TRIM BOARD _ F--i H
COMPACTED SUBGRADE HASP LATCH t" X 4" TRIM BOARD NOT TO SCALE Q
U
SECTION VIEW AT GATE CANE BOLT 1" X 8" TRIM BOARD
INLET DEFLECTOR: (3' WIDE) INLET DEFLECTOR: 3' WIDE Q ( )
DRAINAGE AWAY FROM CURB ( ) B'-0" FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER FORM GROOVES IN CONC. GUTTER TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO TO DIVERT STORM WATER INTO
SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" ELEVATION AT GATE OUTSIDE FACE CONC. CURB & GUTTER BIORETENTION BASIN. CL BASN BIORETENTION BASIN.
ER Z
1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS FILLED WITH $ ~ H 3'- 4- 4- - F„,I
eAac of a~Re ~
CURB & GUTTER PREMOULDED JOINT MATERIAL & JOINT SEALER PAINTED SOLID WHITE 1'-0" 2
30' ~ W
3000 PSI CONC. PAD WITH STIFF BROOM FINISH. NOTE ON FENCING: U A 000000 I
ALL SCREWS, NAILS AND OTHER FASTENERS SHALL BE HOT DIPPED 'F 00000 ~ 0
- 6" THICK 3000 PSI CONC. PAD GALVANIZED FOR EXTERIOR USE. ~ so' 3 -7
- - 4 - =a~ 6" X 6" W4.0 X W4.0 WWF ALL WOOD SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE. i
- i ~ 4 FACE OF OF GUTTER ___I
' ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ . 2'-4" ~ STANDARD CURB dt GU
4 ~ 2" 4 D ~ ~ - - -
, Q-- CURVE WF CURVE WHERE ~ CURB TRANSITION AT CURB INLET
a ~ INDICATED ° a a o INDICATED ON PLAN ~
- o a a
_ 8" CABC - -
° FRAM, GRATE dt HOOD BY 1-o FN~NSH GRADE TiNDALL 123-000 OR APPROVED EQUAL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0,~ -III' _ COMPACTED SUBGRADE ~ ~
ASPHALT
-III- ~ i ~-1 I I-
_ TOP GRATE
I- - - - ELEV. AS NOTED -I ~ - -
NQTE: SCALE: 3/4 -1 -0 I- -
SCALE: 1"=1'-O" PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS FLLED WITH - PRECAST CONCRETE BOX
PREMODU)ED JOINT MATERIAL & JOINT SEALER (20' O.C. MAX. AS ' N11H KNOCKOUT PANELS
SHOWN ON PLAN} AS MANF, BY T~AII OR APPROVED EQUAL
PROVIDE I/2" DEEP SCORE JOINTS AT 5' O.C. WITH ROUNDED EDGES
AS SHOWN ON PLAN.
4 6" SCH. 40 PVC DRAIN UNE WALKWAY SHALL MEET TOWN OF HIGHLANDS STANDARDS AND A 4" THICK CONCRETE WALK W11H STIFF BROOM FNISH AND 2" SMOOTH 1ROWELED BORDERS.
BROOM FINISH SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR ~
CONCRETE CATCH BASIN 2' S4UARE FINISHED GRADE SPECIFlCATIONS. BI ( ) T~ WITH CAST IRON GRATE TO TRAFFlC FLOW.
FOR ROOF DRAIN OVERFLOW _ _ _
=III=1 III=1 I 1=III=III=1I 1=
III=III I 1=III=III=III=III=1 6 X 6 - W2.9 X W2.9 WWF CENTERED ~T STONE
=III= I = 3000 PSI CONCRETE 6" SCH 40 PVC - _ I I IN WALK THICKNESS. , -I 1 -
ROOF DRAIN UNE _ _ _ o o I= 1/4"/FT CROSS SLOPE 1 /2" EXP. JT. - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
ICI=III III -ooooo0000000 - - 000000000000000000000000 -
I=III=~ - - - - _ o a I1= _ , ° CONC. CURB & GUTTER - -
COMPACTED = 111=III-III=III=III=III=III II . - -I 11= ~ I I- fi`r'-` ° I - - ~uunn~ ~~r
SUBGRADE UNDER CATCH BASIN - - - - - - - I = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ' ~ III o a o III d ~ ° , - - ~ I- NuMl~p A
11= II- - o ` , COMPACTED SUBGRADE ~,°.°.,RO ~ PNDS ;
~I~ ~ - II o o a III - y - ° a
11= II nl?AWING - r 4 D oW ~s ~ 502
III a a a III _ _ S ~N~ 11= I I- - - 4 0 , S aN ~
NOT ~ III III 4" WASHED STONE SHED STONE ~ ` O~J'0~'2002
II= _ - = II= COMPACTED SUBGRADE BASE _ ''~~A s wP`~~'' I~U~-08'05'02
11~1~ ~?CN11~C1" III=1 1=III III-111-III NCT To SCALE i i n - e... . ~ i 11 v n
AA iVl 1. Illw'.Y/1 nY. ~ li'Y.V1
nlvv ivv i i v yr u?r v ( 7 CONCRETE WALK DETAIL
OI,pG PP0~UC FILTER FABRIC #57 WASHED STONE I. ~n COMPLETELY WRAP DRY SUMP IL ~loo ~ vU~ 1 wNG~s ~
WITHOUT H15 MI-'T'F-N DRY SUMP 2 SQUARE X 3 DEEP, SCALE: 1"=l'-O"
PF- f?MI5510N ~ 3
1~~TAIL~