WQ0005426_Staff Report_20200311

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Dircatir
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 11, 2020
To: Water QualiW Urmitting Section Central Office
•Qol•!! Giri
No.:
From: Bay
Milosh
/. GENERAL SITE VISIT INFORMATION
I. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: March 5.2020
Application No.: WQ0005426
Permittee: Holly Point SRA
Regional Log -in
b. Site visit conducted by: Ray Milosh
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Curtis Tyree and their contact information: (M) 676 - 3989 ext.
e. Driving directions:
//. FACILITY AND APPLICATION FOR NEW AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: Is this correct? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, please explain:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If no, please explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted
reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, acreage, wells, etc.)?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
North Gdru1 ua f)r p,rr tmrnt ui'Environmr nt.d Qu,ditp I Division of Wahs' ftcsurrr'cc5
Ruff irk I Rr 114111A C fficc ! 3600 Bjr rr I I Wye i RAcigh. NortI i C"it o! ivi Z7609
as«4... k.....nr*..r� dl"�11 019,7414100

If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setbacks conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
111. EXISTING FACILITIES FOR MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
ORC: Curtis Tyree Certificate #: 1Q04690 Backup ORC: Vincent Shea Certificate #998524
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type
of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please explain below in Section IV.
Review Items
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained
appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please
explain below in Section 1V. Review Items
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit e.g., drainage added, new wells
inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? Lj Yes or ® No - If yes, please
explain below in Section IV. Review Items
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No - If no, please explain below
in Section IV. Review Items
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
- If no, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program below
in Section 1V. Review Items
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or
®No
If yes, provide comments below attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
- If no, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items

10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no,
please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If 1 no, ease com lete the following
ex and table if necessar
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
I u
r e
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes
❑ No or ❑ N/A
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review below in Section IV. Review
Items.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes
or ® No
If yes, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement ❑ Currently under JOC
action(s)
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under
❑ Notice(s) of deficiency moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV,
NOD, etc.)
15. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before
issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
Ifyes, please explain below in Section IV. Review Items.
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like Central Office to obtain through an additional information
request:

3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the
permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by
regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: ]
6. Signature of report prepare .
Signature of APS regional supervW_Z.-�����...
7� Date: lelt®z�
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Please ensure that the schedule for measurement of Cl and pH be "per spray event" on Attachment A and
please have this condition entered into BIMS, if possible. (RIMS has been generating violations because it
hasn't been done weekly)
In the third paragraph of the permit, it says "a pump station with two 182 gpm irrigation pumps and a high
water alarm". This is incorrect. There are two pumps, but they are not in a pump station and there is no high
water alarm.
The ORC requests that all three State Recreation Areas (SRA's) Holly Point, Rollingview and Sandling Beach
have the same expiration date. Sandling Beach and Rollingview both expire in the next year, so in my staff
reports for Sandling and Rollingview, I will be asking you to make their expiration dates that same as the
expiration date for Holly Point.