20181608 Ver 1_FINAL_Application_Includes JD_20181121

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location – Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
8. Project Location – Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]:
9. Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]:
10. Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]:
11. Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]:
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]:
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 and 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre-Application Request
Nationwide Permit # Unauthorized Activity
Regional General Permit # Compliance
Jurisdictional Determination Request No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
9
Piedmont Concord Lakes
✔
The proposed project seeks to construct a new multi-use development, including associated parking, pedestrian
connections, and landscaping. (Figure 1).
Carolina Development Services LLC
Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. - Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
The subject property is located west of Concord Lake Road and east of Yost Street in Kannapolis,
Cabarrus County, NC (Figure 1). Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): 35.468358 N, -80.602637 W.
56222982940000
Cabarrus County
Kannapolis
UT to Cold Water Creek
Yadkin Pee-Dee / 03040105
✔
✔
✔

kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

November 21, 2018

Ms. Catherine Janiczak
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006

Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

Re: Pre-Construction Notification (NWP #29) Application &
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina

Dear Ms. Janiczak and Ms. Higgins:

On behalf of our client, Carolina Development Services, LLC, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KH)
is submitting the enclosed joint Section 404/401 Pre-Construction Notification for the above
referenced project for your review pursuant to a Nationwide Permits #29 and General 401 Water
Quality Certification number 4139. This application is to request authorization to fill a wetland for the
purposes of developing residential buildings on the site. The center of the project area is located at
35.468358°N, -80.602637°W. The following information is included as part of this application
submittal:
 Project Summary Sheet
 Agent Authorization Letter
 Pre-Construction Notification Form
 Permit Figures
 Figure 1 - Vicinity
 Figure 2 – USGS Topo (Concord)
 Figure 3 – SSURGO Soils
 Figure 4 – PJD Field Sketch
 Figure 5 – Proposed Conditions
 Permit Drawings for Piedmont Concord Lakes
 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Request
 Field Data Forms
 USACE Wetland Determination Form
 NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
 NCWAM Field Assessment Form
 Project Site Photographs
 Agency Correspondence

Page 2
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project seeks to construct a new multi-family development, including associated
parking, pedestrian connections, and landscaping. The proposed development project requires fill of
0.208-acre of a non-riparian wetland for the purposes of site mass-grading.

SITE DESCRIPTION
The project corridor is located in the piedmont region of North Carolina. Topography is moderate
within the project area and roughly ranges from 700 to 750 feet in elevation (Figure 2; USGS).

The site is comprised mostly of undeveloped forested and open areas, with an abandoned single-
family residence, and multiple other associated detached buildings.

The project is located in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. A field review by Kimley-Horn
environmental scientists was conducted on July 11, 2018. One (1) potential non-wetland water of the
US (WoUS) and one (1) potential wetland WoUS were identified within the project area.

Stream 1 is located along the western project boundary, flowing from north to south. Stream 1 enters
the project area as an intermittent stream and transitions to a perennial stream at approximately 543
lf into the project area, where it continues to flow south through the project area and offsite.

Wetland 1 is a non-riparian, freshwater emergent wetland, which existed historically as an open water
pond. Based on historic aerial imagery research, the pond dam appears to have been breached
sometime between 2005 and 2006. Currently, the dam continues to capture upslope drainage,
originating from residential areas to the north of the project area. The area remains at least saturated
for a long enough duration during the growing season to maintain an emergent wetland community.
The presence of the impoundment likely contributes to the absence of stream indicators within the
downslope drainage swale. This downslope drainage swale feature is illustrated on the most recent
version of the USGS, however, no evidence of at least season flow was observed and indicators of
OHWM were largely absent throughout. Organic debris and diffuse flow were also observed
throughout the swale in the forested portion of the site, and continuous bed and bank were not
observed immediately below the breached pond dam or through other downslope open areas.

Several prominent stormwater drainage features exist within the project area, all originating near the
northern site boundary and continue southwest, downslope, towards Stream 1. These features lack
stream indicators, exhibit diffuse flow, and lack evidence of OHWM throughout the entire feature.
Within the features, high amounts organic debris, such as pine needles and hardwood leaves were
observed. Near the northern portion of the site, these features exhibit a defined bed and bank, most
likely due to the influx of concentrated stormwater runoff from offsite, however, as the features travel
downslope, the bed and banks quickly lose definition throughout forested hillslope. The feature’s bed
and bank generally regain definition again shortly before their confluences with Stream 1. No
baseflow or pooled water were observed within the stormwater drainage features.

Page 3
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions, or if additional
information is necessary.

Sincerely,

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Attachments

Project Summary Sheet
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

Project Name: Piedmont Concord Lakes
Applicant Name and Address: Carolina Development Services, LLC
POC: Johnathan McCall
2649 Brekonridge Centre Dr.
Monroe, NC 28110
Telephone Number:
Type of Request: Nationwide PCN (NWP # 29) Individual Permit Application
Jurisdictional Determination Other:
Included Attachments: Project Plans USGS Map NRCS Soil Survey
Agent Authorization Delineation Sketch Delineation Survey
Data Forms (Up & Wet) NCDWR Stream Forms USACE Stream Forms
NCEEP Confirmation Aerial Photo Site Photos
Agency Correspondence Other: Other:
Check if applicable: CAMA County Trout County Isolated Waters
Section 7, ESA Section 106, NHPA EFH
Mitigation Proposed ( NC EEP On-Site Off-Site Other)
County: Cabarrus County Nearest City/Town: Kannapolis
Waterway: UT to Cold Water Creek River Basin: Yadkin
H.U.C.: 0304010502 USGS Quad Name: Concord
Property Size (acres): 48.48 ac Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 0.501ac
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.468358 °N -80.602637 °W
Project Location: The subject property is located west of Concord Lake Road and east of Yost Street in Kannapolis,
Cabarrus County (Figure 1). Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): 35.468358 N, -80.602637 W.
Site Description: The site is comprised mostly of undeveloped forested and open areas, with an abandoned single-family
residence, and multiple other associated detached buildings. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes,
residential neighborhoods and commercial development, and undeveloped forested/maintained properties.

Impact Summary (if applicable): The proposed project will impact 0.208 acres of wetland. The proposed development
will result in permanent net loss impacts to 0.208 acres of waters of the US due to fill from grading activities on the site.

NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm.
lf ac lf ac lf ac lf Ac
29 0.208 ac
Total 0.208 ac
Total Permanent Impact to Waters of the U.S. (lf/acres) 0.208 ac
(0.208 ac net loss WoUS)

Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Page 1 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:

Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
Yes No

1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Yes No

1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Piedmont Concord Lakes
2b. County: Cabarrus County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Kannapolis
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Carolina Development Services LLC - POC: Johnathan McCall
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Deed Reference: 7645, PG. 315
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 2649 Brekonridge Centre Dr.
3e. City, state, zip: Monroe, NC 28110
3f. Telephone no.: 704-774-1964
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

Page 2 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c. Street address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.: 704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]

Page 3 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN# 56222982940000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.468358 Longitude: -80.602637
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 48.46 acres (Limits-of-Disturbance)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: UT of Cold Water Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Cold Water Creek 13-17-9-4-(1.5), Class C
2c. River basin: Yadkin Pee-Dee (HUC 03040105)

Page 4 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project corridor is located in the piedmont region of North Carolina. Topography is moderate within the project area
and roughly ranges from 700 to 750 feet in elevation (Figure 2; USGS).
The site is comprised mostly of undeveloped forested and open areas, with an abandoned single-family residence, and
multiple other associated detached buildings.
The project is located in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin. A field review by Kimley-Horn environmental scientists was
conducted on July 11, 2018. One (1) potential non-wetland water of the US (WoUS) and one (1) potential wetland WoUS
were identified within the project area.
Stream 1 is located along the western project boundary, flowing from north to south. Stream 1 enters the project area as
an intermittent stream and transitions to a perennial stream at approximately 543 lf into the project area, where it
continues to flow south through the project area and offsite.
Wetland 1 is a non-riparian, freshwater emergent wetland, which existed historically as an open water pond. Based on
historic aerial imagery research, the pond dam appears to have been breached sometime between 2005 and 2006.
Currently, the dam continues to capture upslope drainage, possibly originating in residential areas to the north of the
project area. The area remains at least saturated for a long enough duration during the growing season to maintain an
emergent wetland community. The presence of the impoundment likely contributes to the absence of stream indicators
within the downslope drainage swale. This downslope drainage swale-feature is illustrated on the most recent version of
the USGS, however, no evidence of at least season flow was observed and indicators of OHWM were largely absent
throughout. Organic debris and stems were also observed throughout the swale in the forested portion of the site, and
continuous bed and bank were not observed immediately below the breached pond dam or through other downslope
open areas.
Several prominent stormwater drainage features exist within the project area, all originating near the northern site
boundary and continue southwest, downslope, towards Stream 1. These features lack stream indicators and evidence of
OHWM throughout the entire feature. Within the features, high amounts organic debris, such as pine needles and other
leaves were observed. Near the northern portion of the site, these features exhibit a defined bed and bank, most likely
due to the influx of concentrated stormwater runoff from offsite. As the features travel downslope, the bed and banks
quickly lose definition throughout forested hillslope and then regain little definition again shortly before their confluences
with Stream 1. No baseflow or pooled water were observed within the stormwater drainage features.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.208 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,278 lf
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed project seeks to construct a new multifamily development, including associated parking, pedestrian
connections, and landscaping.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed development project requires fill of 0.208-acre of a non-riparian wetland for the purposes of site mass-grading.
Track hoes and other earth moving equipment is anticipated to be used
on this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
Yes No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

Page 5 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be conducted in two phases, but phase I mass-grading requires wetland fill.

Page 6 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number –
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
2b.

Type of impact
2c.

Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.

Forested

2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404, other)
2f.

Area of impact
(acres)
Wetland 1 (W1)
W P T Fill from mass grading
Non-tidal
freshwater marsh
(non-riparian)
Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.208 ac
W P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
W P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.208 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0
3i. Comments:

Page 7 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
– Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.

Type of impact
4d.

Waterbody type
4e.

Area of impact (acres)
O1 P T
O2 P T
O3 P T
O4 P T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
number
5b.

Proposed use or purpose of
pond

5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

Page 8 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other:
Catawba Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number –
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
6c.

Reason
for impact
6d.

Stream name
6e.

Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.

Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.

Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 P T Yes
No
B2 P T Yes
No
B3 P T Yes
No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and/or minimization of the on-site wetland is not feasible due to the mass-grading requirements on the site. This
impact is unavoidable, however, the on-site stream (Stream 1) has been avoided by the proposed development. Additionally,
a riparian buffer corridor will be maintained along the entire length of Stream 1.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
To prevent potential sedimentation of the avoided on-site stream, an approved sediment and erosion control plan is in place
and will be maintained throughout the life of the project. Upon completion of the project, all erosion control measures will be
removed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity

Page 9 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.208 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)

Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:

Page 10 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 75%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project will be constructed in phases and will provide a single BMP to serve the proposed Phase I portion of the
development
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? City of Kannapolis
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Proposed Phase I will have standard gravity fed sewer discharge to public system.
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No

Page 11 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Proposed phase I will have standard gravity fed sewer discharge to public system.

Page 12 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The project area and vicinity are not located in a Designated Critical Habitat. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database on November 14, 2018 did not indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species
within a 2-mile radius of the proposed project. Potentially suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present within the
project area, however, based on a pedestrian survey conducted on August 30, 2018 within areas of potentially suitable
habitat, no individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed. (See attached NCNHP Report.)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service on November 14, 2018
indicated that there were no properties currently listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places within a one mile radius of the project. (See attached HPOWEB map.)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The proposed project will be constructed outside of the 100-year FEMA floodplain. Firm Panel 5662 (Revised November 16,
2018)

Chris Tinklenberg, PWS

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name

_______________________________
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)

11/14/2018

Date

±
0 800 1,600Feet
Figure 1: VicinityPiedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NCNovember 2018
Figu re 1
0 5 10Miles
Legend
Project Boundary
±
0 1,000 2,000Feet
Figure 2: USGS Topo (Concord)Piedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NCNovember 2018
Legend
Project Boundary
UV3
D a l e E a r n h a r d t B l v d
O p al StH o lla n d S t
Furman CtClemson CtFurman CtFlorida AveD a k o t a S t
C a l i f o r n i a S t
K a n s a s S t
T e n n e s s e e S t
Indiana St
R h o d e I sl a n d Av e
Unknow n Lake Concor
d RdY
o
s
t
A
v
eColiseum AveOnyx AveBernard AveConcord Lake RdCentergrove Rd
Jasper StCitadel CtLeroy StColiseum Ave
Unknown
Cambridge Dr
Concord Lake RdEnB
EoB
IdB
ChA
ChA
±
0 350 700Feet
Figure 3: SSURGO SoilsPiedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NCNovember 2018
Le gend
Project Boundary
Hydric Rating
Not Hydric (0%)
Hydric (1 to 32%)
!.
!.
_!_!_!_!_!
_!_!_!_!_!_!_!_
!_!_!UV3
T e n n e s s e e S t
D a k o t a S t
Citadel CtCl
ems
on Ct Lake Concord RdFurman CtH o l l a n d S t
U n i v e r s i t y D rAlabama S t
K a n s a s S t
Furman CtOnyx AveY
o
st
A
v
e
Unknown
Ohio Ave1
2
3
4
5
7
6
8
9
10
13
14
17
16
15
±
0 250 500Feet
Figure 4: Exisitng ConditionsPiedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NCNovember 2018
Legend
Project Boundary
Limits of Disturbance
Survey Contours
!.Upland Data Point
!.Wetland Data Point
_!Photo Locations
Wetland (Potential Wetland WoUS)
Intermittent Stream (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS)
Perennial Stream (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS)
Stormwater Drainage Feature
Wetland 1
Stream 1
11
12
UV3
Furman CtLake Concord RdCitadel CtClemson CtUnknown
D a k o t a S t
U n i v e r s i t y D r
H o lla n d S t
Furman CtT e n n e s s e e S t Onyx AveOhio AveY
o
s
t
A
v
e
K a n s a s S t
Rox ie St
±
0 250 500Feet
Figure 5: Proposed ConditionsPiedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NCNovember 2018
Legend
Project Boundary
Limits of Disturbance
Proposed Grading
Wetland (Potential Wetland WoUS)
Perennial Stream (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS)
Intermittent Stream (Potential Non-Wetland WoUS)
Stormwater Drainage Feature
Wetland Impact - Permanent Im pact 1Grading Fill Related ToConstruction Activities0.208 acres
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESCOVER SHEETC0-1
VICINITY MAP
NTS LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 200'
11/16/2018
PROJECT
AREA
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKE
MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT
CONCORD LAKE ROAD KANNAPOILS, NC
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 N. TRYON STREET
SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202
[phone] TEL
LICENSE NO. F-0102
CONTACT: ADAM ESSINK, P.E.
SURVEYOR:ENGINEER:
NOTES:
ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR
UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO THE FINAL
CONNECTIONS OF SERVICES.
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN,
AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND
CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS
DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN
AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND
ASSOCIATES, INC.
GROUNDWATER NOTE:
THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.
CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE.
R.B. PHARR & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
420 HAWTHORNE LANE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28204
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JUSTIN CLONINGER, PLS
PROJECT CONTACT LIST:
GEOTECH:
SUMMIT ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING P.C.
3575 CENTRE CIRCLE DRIVE
FORT MILL, SOUTH CAROLINA 29715
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: KERRY C. COOPER, P.E.
CAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
2649 BREKONRIDGE ROAD
MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA 28110
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JOHNATHAN MCCALL
OWNER:
85
29
Know what's
R
EROSION CONTROL NOTESGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
GROUND STABILIZATION
GRADING NOTES:
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS AND
CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
NO WORK WITHIN NCDOT RIGHT OF WAY SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHOUT ALL PERMITS.
EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR
RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL
UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE
INCLUDED IN BASE BID. AREAS TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE IMPROVED PER THE CIVIL PLANS OR
RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY EXISTING
FEATURES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION.
SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SIGNED ALTA/NSPS
SURVEY PERFORMED BY R.B. PHARR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. ON JANUARY 30, 2007. ALL INFORMATION IS
TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ALL NECESSARY BARRICADES, SIGNS, FENCES, FLASHING LIGHTS,
TRAFFIC MEN, ETC. FOR MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AS REQUIRED BY THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT).
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MONUMENTS, IRON PINS, AND PROPERTY CORNERS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ANY
GRADING BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION IS SUBJECT TO A FINE. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE
GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AND CITY OF
KANNAPOILS.
CONTRACTOR AGREES TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE NCDOT AND CITY OF KANNAPOLIS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND
BETWEEN THE ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT
FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM, CREEK, OR BACKWASH CHANNEL IN A
UNOBSTRUCTED STATE AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THE CHANNEL AND BANKS OF THE STREAM ALL
DEBRIS, LOGS, TIMBER, JUNK AND OTHER ACCUMULATIONS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A
SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL POST ASSIGNED BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER AND ADDRESS ON BUILDING.
IN ROLLING OR HILLY TERRAINS, SWEEPING OF THE STONE BASE AND/OR APPLICATION OF A TACK
COAT MAY BE REQUIRED NEAR INTERSECTIONS. THESE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY
THE INSPECTOR AND BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
CONTACT THE UTILITY COMPANY TO RELOCATE ANY EXISTING UTILITY AND/OR LIGHT POLES. ALL
EXISTING FACILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS
PROJECT MUST BE RELOCATED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST (3) THREE WORKING
DAYS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH
THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR APPROPRIATE
SLOPE STABILIZATION ON ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR BLASTING ROCK IF BLAST ROCK IS
ENCOUNTERED. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLEY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL BLASTING
AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 2:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED
TO SAME.
ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES,
AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.
LIMITS OF CLEARING SHOWN ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ARE BASED UPON THE APPROXIMATE
CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS, OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL SHEETING,
SHORING, BRACING AND SPECIAL EXCAVATION MEASURES REQUIRED TO MEET OSHA, FEDERAL,
STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE WORK INDICATED ON
THESE DRAWINGS. THE DESIGN ENGINEER ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN(S) TO
INSTALL SAID ITEMS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE ANY DEWATERING AND MOISTURE
CONDITIONING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,
THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, OFFSETS AND
ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES, AND THE
MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS.
ANY CONSTRUCTION OR USE WITHIN THE AREAS DELINEATED AS FLOODWAY DISTRICT FRINGE
BOUNDARY LINE OR FLOODWAY DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT BOUNDARY LINE IS SUBJECT TO THE
RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE FLOODWAY REGULATIONS OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
1) SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE LAND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING
SCHEDULE:
i) ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN
3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1) SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7
CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
ii) ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION
WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS
FROM THE LAST LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
2) CONDITIONS - IN MEETING THE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OR EXEMPTIONS SHALL APPLY:
i) EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY BASED ON WEATHER
OR OTHER SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS THAT MAKE COMPLIANCE IMPRACTICABLE.
ii) ALL SLOPES 50' IN LENGTH OR GREATER SHALL APPLY THE GROUND COVER WITHIN 7 DAYS
EXCEPT WHEN THE SLOPE IS FLATTER THAN 4:1. SLOPES LESS THAN 50' SHALL APPLY
GROUNDCOVER WITHIN 14 DAYS EXCEPT WHEN SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3:1, THE 7
DAY-REQUIREMENT APPLIES.
iii) ANY SLOPED AREA FLATTER THAN 4:1 SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE 7-DAY GROUND COVER
REQUIREMENT.
iv) ALTHOUGH STABILIZATION IS USUALLY SPECIFIED AS GROUND COVER, OTHER METHODS, SUCH
AS CHEMICAL STABILIZATION, MAY BE ALLOWED ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
v) FOR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS WITHIN THE SEDIMENT CONTROL COMMISSION-DEFINED "HIGH
QUALITY WATER ZONE" (I5A NCAC 04A. 0105) , STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER SHALL BE
ACHIEVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT ON ALL AREAS OF THE SITE WITHIN 7
CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND DISTURBING ACT.
vi) PORTIONS OF A SITE THAT ARE LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN ADJACENT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS
AND ARE NOT EXPECTED TO DISCHARGE DURING CONSTRUCTION MAY BE EXEMPT FROM THE
TEMPORARY GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS IF IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED E&SC PLAN OR
ADDED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY.
3) ALL DIVERSION DITCHES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MATTED WITH NAG SC-150 OR APPROVED EQUAL.
TOTAL AREA DISTURBED = 41 ACRES
LIMITS OF GRADING SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE MAXIMUM LIMITS FOR EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES
ONLY. SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE ACTUAL LIMIT.
CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH NCDEQ.
ON-SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE AN ON-SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILL PERMIT FROM THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR.
ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF NCDEQ AND IS
SUBJECT TO A FINE.
GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION
OF NCDEQ AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES GREATER STEEPER THAN 3
HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1) SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION
WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM
THE LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED
TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN
ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BE REQUIRED BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF NCDEQ.
SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1.
A GRADING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY GRADING THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
DEVIATION FROM THESE PLANS AND NOTES WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE OWNER, HIS
REPRESENTATIVE, OR THE ENGINEER MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACCEPTABLE.
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF
1973, THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY, THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PERMIT, AND THESE
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
SUFFICIENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO RETAIN
SEDIMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SITE AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT
WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL OTHER DISTURBED
AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS
SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST
LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
THE SEDIMENT BASINS AND DIVERSION DITCHES SHALL BE CLEANED OUT WHEN THE STORAGE
CAPACITY HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN
THE SEDIMENT POOL NO LONGER DRAINS PROPERLY.
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A CERTIFIED INSPECTOR
TWICE A WEEK AND AFTER EVERY 0.5 INCH RAINFALL EVENT, BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN TWICE
EVERY WEEK. NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF INSPECTION. SUBMIT
WRITTEN REPORT WITH EACH INSPECTION TO THE OWNER.
SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SILT FENCING WHEN IT BECOMES 6-INCHES DEEP AT
THE FENCE. THE FENCING WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT BARRIER.
ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO
THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER.
ALL DRAINAGE SWALES MUST BE GRASSED AND RIP-RAP MUST BE REPLACED AS REQUIRED TO
CONTROL EROSION. RIP-RAP WILL CONSIST OF 50 TO 125 POUND STONES PLACED AT ALL
HEADWALLS, AND WHERE NOTED ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. (SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR OUTFALL
PIPE SIZE CHART)
ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OR SILT BARRIERS TO BE PLACED AS DIRECTED BY THE
LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL INSPECTOR.
WHEN ANY CONSTRUCTION BORDERS A DRAINAGE COURSE:
A. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ANY BUILDING OR OTHER
EXCAVATION SPOIL DIRT, CONSTRUCTION TRASH OR DEBRIS, ETC., FROM THE
DRAINAGE AREA SHOWN HEREON IN A EXPEDITIOUS MANNER AS
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES.
B. THE CONTRACTOR HEREBY AGREES TO STOP ALL WORK AND RESTORE THESE
IMMEDIATELY UPON NOTIFICATION BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL INSPECTOR
AND/OR THE OWNER.
FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION ALONG AND/OR ACROSS WATERWAYS, BANK PROTECTION AND
STABILIZATION SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PER LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL EROSION CONTROL LAWS.
ALL TREE PROTECTION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO
COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER WORKING ORDER UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED AND GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED. CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS
PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND DISTURBANCE PLAN AND PERMIT ON
SITE WHENEVER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS.
INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF ALL PROPOSED CUT AND FILL
CONSTRUCTION AND AS INDICATED ON PLANS.
A TEMPORARY DIVERSION SWALE MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE WHERE RUNOFF CAN BE
DIRECTED TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN.
IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM REQUIRED MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES TO ENSURE THEIR FUNCTION AT ALL TIMES.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION
HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
WHERE SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A PAVED OR PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SURFACE
SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL
AREA. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
WHEN A CRUSHED STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAS BEEN COVERED WITH SOIL OR OR HAS
BEEN PUSHED INTO THE SOIL BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, IT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH A DEPTH OF
STONE EQUAL TO THAT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION.
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT THE EXISTING EXPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AT ALL TIMES
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION.
PERFORM A FINAL DEMUCKING OF ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES BEFORE DEMOBILIZATION.
BE ADVISED DIRECTLY PUMPING OUT A SEDIMENT BASIN IS CONSIDERED BYPASSING A STORMWATER
CONTROL FACILITY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION IV (3) OF NPDES PERMIT NCG0100000 STORMWATER
DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF ANY DRAINING OCCURS OF THE SEDIMENT
BASIN, SUCH AS FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE BASIN OR CONVERSION TO THE POST-CONSTRUCTION
STORMWATER MEASURE, THE DRAINAGE MUST OCCUR THROUGH A SILT BAG AND DISCHARGED IN A
NON EROSIVE MANNER. [15A NCAC 4B 0105]
ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL EARTHWORK AREAS TO
PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR OFFSITE ROADWAYS, AS
APPLICABLE.
2.SILT FENCE FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS
COMPLETE AND LANDSCAPING IS INSTALLED.
3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEANUP AND REPAIR ALL EROSION DAMAGE AFTER
DISCOVERY AND REINSTALL ADEQUATE CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT
REOCCURRENCE OF DAMAGE.
4. CONSTRUCTION POINT OF ACCESS TO LIMIT DEPOSITS OF EARTH AND OTHER HAULED
MATERIALS ONTO THE ADJACENT LOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTINELY CLEAN ALL
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND DEBRIS FROM ROADWAY AS THEY OCCUR.
SEEDING SCHEDULE AND SEEDBED PREPARATION
SEEDING SCHEDULE
1.SEED, MULCH, AND FERTILIZE AS SHOWN ON THE PHASED EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
2.PROTECTIVE COVER MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS, GRADED SLOPES AND
FILLS.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
1. GRADED SLOPES AND FILL - THE ANGLE FOR GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER
THAN THE ANGLE WHICH CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER ADEQUATE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES.
2.SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.
3.AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE RIPPED AND SPREAD WITH AVAILABLE TOPSOIL 3" DEEP. TOTAL
SEEDBED PREPARED DEPTH SHALL BE 4" TO 8" DEEP.
4.LOOSE ROCKS, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE SO
THAT THEY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATION.
SURFACE FOR FINAL SEEDBED PREPARATION, AT FINISH GRADES SHOWN, SHALL BE
REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
5.IF NO SOIL TEST IS TAKEN, FERTILIZER AND LIME SHALL BE ACCORDING TO SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS.
6.IF SOIL TEST IS TAKEN, PROVIDE LIME AND FERTILIZER ACCORDING TO THE SOIL TEST REPORT.
7.LIME AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED UNIFORMLY AND MIXED WITH THE SOIL DURING
SEEDBED PREPARATION.
RIP RAP
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. SUBGRADE PREPARATION - PREPARE THE SUBGRADE FOR RIP RAP AND FILTER TO THE
REQUIRED LINES AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. COMPACT ANY FILL REQUIRED IN THE
SUBGRADE TO A DENSITY APPROXIMATING THAT OF THE SURROUNDING UNDISTURBED MATERIAL
OR OVERFILL DEPRESSIONS WITH RIPRAP. REMOVE BRUSH, TREES, STUMPS AND OTHER
OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. CUT THE SUBGRADE SUFFICIENTLY DEEP THAT THE FINISHED GRADE
OF THE RIPRAP WILL BE AT THE ELEVATION OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. CHANNELS SHOULD BE
EXCAVATED SUFFICIENTLY TO ALLOW PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP IN A MANNER SUCH THAT THE
FINISHED INSIDE DIMENSIONS AND GRADE OF THE RIPRAP MEET DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS.
2. SAND AND GRAVEL FILTER BLANKET - PLACE THE FILTER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE
GROUND FOUNDATION IS PREPARED. FOR GRAVEL, SPREAD FILTER STONE IN A UNIFORM LAYER
TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH. WHERE MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL IS USED,
SPREAD THE LAYERS WITH MINIMAL MIXING.
3.SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC - PLACE THE CLOTH FILTER DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED
FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST 12 INCHES, AND SPACE ANCHOR PINS EVERY 3
FT ALONG THE OVERLAP. BURY THE UPSTREAM END OF THE CLOTH A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES
BELOW GROUND AND WHERE NECESSARY, BURY THE LOWER END OF THE CLOTH OR OVERLAP
WITH THE NEXT SECTION AS REQUIRED. TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE THE CLOTH WHEN PLACING
RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS REMOVE THE RIPRAP AND REPAIR THE SHEET BY ADDING ANOTHER
LAYER OF FILTER MATERIALS WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGE
AREA. IF EXTENSIVE DAMAGE IS SUSPECTED, REMOVE AND REPLACE THE ENTIRE SHEET.
4.WHERE LARGE STONES ARE USED OR MACHINE PLACEMENT IS DIFFICULT, A 4-INCH LAYER OF
FINE GRAVEL OR SAND MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT THE FILTER CLOTH.
5. STONE PLACEMENT - PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT
OF THE FILTER. PLACE RIPRAP SO THAT IT FORMS A DENSE, WELL-GRADED MASS OF STONE
WITH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS. THE DESIGNED DISTRIBUTION OF STONES THROUGHOUT THE MASS
MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE LOADING AT THE QUARRY AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING
FINAL PLACEMENT. PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE
RIPRAP BY DUMPING THE THROUGH CHUTES OR OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION
OF STONE SIZES. TAKE CARE NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER WHEN
PLACING THE STONES.
6. THE FINISHED SLOPE SHOULD BE FREE OF POCKETS OF SMALL STONE OR CLUSTERS OF LARGE
STONES. HAND PLACING MAY BE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF STONE
SIZES TO PRODUCE A RELATIVELY SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE. THE FINISHED GRADE OF
RIPRAP SHOULD BLEND WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. NO OVERFALL OR PROTRUSION OF
RIPRAP SHOULD BE APPARENT.
7. INSPECT CHANNELS AT REGULAR INTERVALS AS WELL AS AFTER MAJOR RAINS, AND MAKE
REPAIRS PROMPTLY. GIVE SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE OUTLET AND INLET SECTIONS AND
OTHER POINTS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW ENTERS. CAREFULLY CHECK STABILITY AT ROAD
CROSSINGS AND LOOK FOR INDICATIONS OF PIPING, SCOUR HOLES, OR BANK FAILURES. MAKE
REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. MAINTAIN ALL VEGETATION ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL IN A HEALTHY
VIGOROUS CONDITION TO PROTECT THE AREA FROM EROSION AND SCOUR DURING OUT-OF-BAN
FLOW. CONTROL OF WEED AND BRUSH GROWTH MAY BE NEEDED IN SOME LOCATIONS
MAINTENANCE PLAN
1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES FOR
STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE
LESS THAN ONCE E VERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY BY THE
CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED. ALSO PER NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT, A RAIN GAUGE MUST
BE INSTALLED ON SITE. THE RAIN GAUGE MUST BE KEPT ONSITE AND INSPECTIONS BY THE
CONTRACTOR MUST BE MADE AND LOGGED AFTER EVERY HALF INCH OF RAINFALL AND ONCE A
WEEK.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM SEDIMENT BASIN WHEN STORAGE CAPACITY
HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL WILL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN THE
SEDIMENT POOL NO LONGER DRAINS PROPERLY.
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM BEHIND SLIT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES 0.5
FEET DEEP AT THE FENCE. SLIT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A
BARRIER.
5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FERTILIZE, RESEED AS NECESSARY, AND MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS
ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE VEGETATIVE PLAN TO MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE
VEGETATIVE COVER.
.
UTILITY NOTES
1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY LOCATING AND
PROTECTING ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) WHICH LIE IN OR
ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. AT LEAST (3) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO ANY
DEMOLITION, GRADING, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE
NORTH CAROLINA ONE-CALL UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (ULOCO) AT [phone] FOR
PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE SITE.
2.SHOULD ANY UNCHARTED OR INCORRECTLY CHARTED UTILITIES BE ENCOUNTERED, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY FOR DIRECTIONS.
3.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANY INTERRUPTION OF UTILITY SERVICE WITH OWNER AND
RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE.
4. ANY PLANNED INTERRUPTION OF UTILITY SERVICE SHALL BE GIVEN A 48 HOUR NOTICE TO THE
UTILITY COMPANY AND THE OWNER.
5.CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT, REMOVE, AND REPLACE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO
INSTALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE, SEWER, WATER, AND COMMUNICATION
CONDUITS.
6.ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL POWER COMPANY
STANDARDS.
INSPECTION NOTES
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2010, PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES MUST
INSPECT THE SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE
OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED. SELF-INSPECTION REPORTS ARE REQUIRED. A SAMPLE
SELF-INSPECTION REPORT, AS WELL AS DETAILS OF THE SELF-INSPECTION PROGRAM, CAN BE
FOUND ON THE LAND QUALITY WEBSITE:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/erosion-sediment-control/forms
AS A MINIMUM, THE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED AFTER EACH OF THE FOLLOWING
PHASES OF A PLAN:
1.INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.
2.INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT TRAPS/BASINS.
3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF EXISTING GROUND COVER.
4. COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING THAT REQUIRES PROVISION OF STABILIZATION.
5. INSTALLATION OF MEASURES DURING ANY PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
6. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
7. INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER RETENTION MEASURES.
8.QUARTERLY UNTIL THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS FULLY
ESTABLISHED.
HYDROSEED MULCH WITH PAM APPLICATION GUIDELINES
ALL HYDROSEEDING SPECIFIED FOR THIS SITE SHALL INCLUDE PAM ADDITIVE MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS AND GUIDELINES BELOW. HYDROSEEDING SHALL BE INSTALLED
AS THE FIRST MEASURE OF SLOPE STABILIZATION WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING BEING
PLACED OVER THE APPLICATION.
1.MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDED APPLICATION RATE (PER ACRE COVERAGE): SITE
APPLICATION RATES VARY BY SOIL CONTENT AND GRADE OF SLOPE AND SHALL BE VERIFIED
BY SITE SPECIFIC SOIL TESTING AS OUTLINED IN THE FLOCCULANT/POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM)
APPLICATION NOTES.
a. GENTLE TO MODERATE SLOPES (0 TO 4H:1V)
i.HIGH CLAY CONTENT: 10-20 # POWDER OR 1.0-2.0 GALLONS EMULSION
ii. HIGH SAND CONTENT: 25-50 # POWDER OR 2.0-3.0 GALLONS EMULSION
b.STEEP SLOPES (3H:1V TO 1H:1V)
i. HIGH CLAY CONTENT: 20-35 # POWDER OR 1.0-2.5 GALLONS EMULSION
ii.HIGH SAND CONTENT: 40-50 # POWDER OR 2.5-3.0 GALLONS EMULSION
2. ADD PAM EMULSION OR POWDER TO ALL HYDROSEEDING MIXES AT THE ABOVE
APPLICATION RATES OF NO MORE THAN 30 POUNDS OF POWDER AND NOR MORE THAN 2.5
GALLONS PER 3000 GALLONS OF WATER, AND THEN APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 3000 GALLONS
OF HYDROSEED MIX/ ACRE (NOTE: POLYMER ADDITIONS ARE LIMITED BY EXTREMELY HIGH
VISCOSITY, DO NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED DOSAGE RATES.) SITE TESTING SHALL
DETERMINE THE CORRECT POLYMER TYPE.
3.PAM SHALL BE ADDED SLOWLY AS THE FINAL ADDITIVE TO THE HYDROSEEDING MIX TO HELP
AVOID POLYMER CLUMPING THAT COULD RESULT IN CLOGGING OF THE SPRAYING
EQUIPMENT.
4.THE HYDROSEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER MIXING DUE TO THE VISCOUS
NATURE OF THE PAM POLYMER.
5.THE STRAW, MULCH, AND/OR EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED OVER THE
HYDROSEEDED APPLICATION AS SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS.PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESGENERAL NOTESC0-2
SOILS TYPE LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
XxX
CcB2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CcD2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CeB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
ChA CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
ENB ENON SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
EnD ENON SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
EoB ENON-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
IdB IREDELL LOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
PoB POINDEXTER LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
PoD POINDEXTER LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:
41
SOIL TYPE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SLOPE ARROW
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN
TEMPORARY/PERMANENT DIVERSION
DITCH OR BERM, SEE DETAIL SHEET
SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN
PROPERTY LINE
RIP RAP APRON , RIP-RAP SHALL
BE GRADED AT 0.0% SLOPE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY
SLOPE MATTING
(SC150 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED)
TEMPORARY PROTECTION FENCE/
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
SEE DETAIL SHEET
STONE FILTER RING
COIR WATTLE CHECK DAM, SEE DETAIL
SHEET
CONSTRUCTION EXIT
EE DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY RISER SKIMMER, SEE
DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY JUTE NET BAFFLES
12" COIR WATTLE/FILTREX FILTER
SOX, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
LOD
SIS
CE
CD
JN
DD#
ECB
SF
PF
RR
SD #
SFR
CW
SK
(SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR TYPICAL DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES. THIS SHEET FOR
ADDITIONAL NOTES.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL NOT DESIGNATED
FOR REMOVAL OR RELOCATION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL SURROUNDING PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FREE FROM DIRT, MUD, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT
ALL TIMES.
3. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AREAS SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESE
PLANS.
4. LIMITS OF DEMOLITION INDICATED ON PLAN ARE MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE
CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT
OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED FOR
DEMOLITION) DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPERTY
CORNERS, MONUMENTS, ETC.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS TO OBTAIN
ALL NECESSARY DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY
DEMOLITION WORK.
7. REMOVE VEGETATION AND GRASS IN AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW ASPHALT AND
CONCRETE PAVEMENTS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE OFF-SITE FACILITIES WITHIN
THE PROJECT SITE TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS, CONCRETE STRUCTURES (ABOVE
GROUND AND FOUNDATION), SITE LIGHTING STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS AND
SECONDARY UTILITIES. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PER
LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS.
9. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS THAT
SERVE ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE
PROPERLY PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND
ENGINEER ANY UNFORESEEN OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING
UNCHARTED UTILITIES, DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED
FOR DEMOLITION) WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING
PROPERTY CORNERS, MONUMENTS, VEGETATION, ETC.
DB#
IP INLET PROTECTION
EoB
ChA
EnB
EnB
DD2
CW
PF
PF
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
SF
RR1A RR 1B
ECB
ECB
ECB
SF
SD1B
SD1A
DB1
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLPHASE 1C2-1Know what's
R
NORTH
IdB
DD4
SD 2B
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
SFR
SFR
SFR
IP
RR 2B
RR
JN
JN
SD 3A
RR3A
RR 3B
ECB
ECBECB
ECB
ECB
SD 2A
RR2A
RR 2C
SD 3B
SOILS TYPE LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
XxX
CcB2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CcD2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CeB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
ChA CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
ENB ENON SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
EnD ENON SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
EoB ENON-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
IdB IREDELL LOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
PoB POINDEXTER LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
PoD POINDEXTER LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:
41
SOIL TYPE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SLOPE ARROW
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN
TEMPORARY/PERMANENT DIVERSION
DITCH OR BERM, SEE DETAIL SHEET
SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN
PROPERTY LINE
RIP RAP APRON , RIP-RAP SHALL
BE GRADED AT 0.0% SLOPE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY
SLOPE MATTING
(SC150 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED)
TEMPORARY PROTECTION FENCE/
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
SEE DETAIL SHEET
STONE FILTER RING
COIR WATTLE CHECK DAM, SEE DETAIL
SHEET
CONSTRUCTION EXIT
EE DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY RISER SKIMMER, SEE
DETAIL SHEET
TEMPORARY JUTE NET BAFFLES
12" COIR WATTLE/FILTREX FILTER
SOX, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
LOD
SIS
CE
CD
JN
DD#
ECB
SF
PF
RR
SD #
SFR
CW
SK
(SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR TYPICAL DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES. THIS SHEET FOR
ADDITIONAL NOTES.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL NOT DESIGNATED
FOR REMOVAL OR RELOCATION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL SURROUNDING PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FREE FROM DIRT, MUD, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT
ALL TIMES.
3. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AREAS SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESE
PLANS.
4. LIMITS OF DEMOLITION INDICATED ON PLAN ARE MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE
CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT
OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED FOR
DEMOLITION) DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPERTY
CORNERS, MONUMENTS, ETC.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS TO OBTAIN
ALL NECESSARY DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY
DEMOLITION WORK.
7. REMOVE VEGETATION AND GRASS IN AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW ASPHALT AND
CONCRETE PAVEMENTS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE OFF-SITE FACILITIES WITHIN
THE PROJECT SITE TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS, CONCRETE STRUCTURES (ABOVE
GROUND AND FOUNDATION), SITE LIGHTING STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS AND
SECONDARY UTILITIES. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PER
LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS.
9. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS THAT
SERVE ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE
PROPERLY PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND
ENGINEER ANY UNFORESEEN OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING
UNCHARTED UTILITIES, DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED
FOR DEMOLITION) WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING
PROPERTY CORNERS, MONUMENTS, VEGETATION, ETC.
DB#
IP INLET PROTECTION
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLPHASE 1C2-2Know what's
R
NORTH
SOILS TYPE LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
XxXXxX
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
CcB2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CcD2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CeB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
ChA CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
ENB ENON SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
EnD ENON SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
EoB ENON-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
IdB IREDELL LOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
PoB POINDEXTER LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
PoD POINDEXTER LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
(SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR TYPICAL DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES. THIS SHEET FOR
ADDITIONAL NOTES.
SLOPE ARROW
SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN
RIP RAP APRON , RIP-RAP SHALL
BE GRADED AT 0.0% SLOPE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:
41
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL NOT DESIGNATED
FOR REMOVAL OR RELOCATION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL SURROUNDING PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FREE FROM DIRT, MUD, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT
ALL TIMES.
3. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AREAS SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESE
PLANS.
4. LIMITS OF DEMOLITION INDICATED ON PLAN ARE MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE
CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT
OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED FOR
DEMOLITION) DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPERTY
CORNERS, MONUMENTS, ETC.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS TO OBTAIN
ALL NECESSARY DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY
DEMOLITION WORK.
7. REMOVE VEGETATION AND GRASS IN AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW ASPHALT AND
CONCRETE PAVEMENTS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE OFF-SITE FACILITIES WITHIN
THE PROJECT SITE TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS, CONCRETE STRUCTURES (ABOVE
GROUND AND FOUNDATION), SITE LIGHTING STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS AND
SECONDARY UTILITIES. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PER
LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS.
9. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS THAT
SERVE ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE
PROPERLY PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND
ENGINEER ANY UNFORESEEN OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING
UNCHARTED UTILITIES, DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED
FOR DEMOLITION) WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING
PROPERTY CORNERS, MONUMENTS, VEGETATION, ETC.
SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY
SOIL TYPE
TEMPORARY PROTECTION FENCE/
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
SEE DETAIL SHEET
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
STONE FILTER RING
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
TEMPORARY JUTE NET BAFFLES
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN
TEMPORARY/PERMANENT DIVERSION
DITCH OR BERM, SEE DETAIL SHEET
PERMANENT SEEDING
SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR SCHEDULE
PROPERTY LINE
CONSTRUCTION EXIT
SEE DETAIL SHEET
ROCK CHECK DAM
SEE DETAIL SHEET
12" COIR WATTLE/FILTREX FILTER
SOX, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INLET PROTECTION
TEMPORARY RISER SKIMMER, SEE
DETAIL SHEET
SLOPE MATTING
(SC150 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED)
LOD
SIS
CE
CD
JN
DD#
PS
SF
PF
RR
SD #
SFR
CW
SK
DB#
IP
ECB
EoB
ChA
EnB
EnB
DD2
CW
PF
PF
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
SF
RR1A RR 1B
ECB
ECB
ECB
SF
SD1A
DB1
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLPHASE 2C2-3Know what's
R
NORTH
SOILS TYPE LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
XxXXxX
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
CcB2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CcD2 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED
CeB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
ChA CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
ENB ENON SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
EnD ENON SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
EoB ENON-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES
IdB IREDELL LOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
PoB POINDEXTER LOAM, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES
PoD POINDEXTER LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES
(SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR TYPICAL DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES. THIS SHEET FOR
ADDITIONAL NOTES.
SLOPE ARROW
SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN
RIP RAP APRON , RIP-RAP SHALL
BE GRADED AT 0.0% SLOPE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:
41
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL NOT DESIGNATED
FOR REMOVAL OR RELOCATION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL SURROUNDING PUBLIC ROADWAYS AND
DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FREE FROM DIRT, MUD, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT
ALL TIMES.
3. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR STAGING AREAS SHALL BE
LIMITED TO THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESE
PLANS.
4. LIMITS OF DEMOLITION INDICATED ON PLAN ARE MINIMUM. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REMOVE AND REPLACE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE
CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT
OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED FOR
DEMOLITION) DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING PROPERTY
CORNERS, MONUMENTS, ETC.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF KANNAPOLIS TO OBTAIN
ALL NECESSARY DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY
DEMOLITION WORK.
7. REMOVE VEGETATION AND GRASS IN AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW ASPHALT AND
CONCRETE PAVEMENTS.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE OFF-SITE FACILITIES WITHIN
THE PROJECT SITE TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS, CONCRETE STRUCTURES (ABOVE
GROUND AND FOUNDATION), SITE LIGHTING STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS AND
SECONDARY UTILITIES. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PER
LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS.
9. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS THAT
SERVE ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE
PROPERLY PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND
ENGINEER ANY UNFORESEEN OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING
UNCHARTED UTILITIES, DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND/OR
REPLACEMENT OF ANY ITEMS OR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS (NOT SCHEDULED
FOR DEMOLITION) WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING
PROPERTY CORNERS, MONUMENTS, VEGETATION, ETC.
SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY
SOIL TYPE
TEMPORARY PROTECTION FENCE/
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
SEE DETAIL SHEET
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
STONE FILTER RING
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
TEMPORARY JUTE NET BAFFLES
LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN
TEMPORARY/PERMANENT DIVERSION
DITCH OR BERM, SEE DETAIL SHEET
PERMANENT SEEDING
SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR SCHEDULE
PROPERTY LINE
CONSTRUCTION EXIT
SEE DETAIL SHEET
ROCK CHECK DAM
SEE DETAIL SHEET
12" COIR WATTLE/FILTREX FILTER
SOX, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INLET PROTECTION
TEMPORARY RISER SKIMMER, SEE
DETAIL SHEET
SLOPE MATTING
(SC150 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED)
IdB
DD4 CD
TYP.
SD 2B
CW
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
SFR
SFR
SFR
IP
RR 2B
RR
JN
JN
SD 3A
RR3A
RR 3B
ECBECB
ECB
ECB
SD 2A
RR2A
RR 2C
SD 3B
DD6
CD
TYP.ECB
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLPHASE 2C2-4Know what's
R
NORTH
SEDIMENT BASIN WITH PIPE OUTLET
TEMPORARY SKIMMER RISER SEDIMENT BASIN WITH PIPE OUTLETTEMPORARY SKIMMER RISER SEDIMENT BASIN WITH PIPE OUTLET
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLDETAILSC2-5
BAFFLE SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
1.USE MATTING MADE OF 100% COCONUT FIBER (COIR) TWINE WOVEN INTO HIGH STRENGTH
MATRIX WITH THE PROPERTIES SHOWN IN TABLE 6.65A.
2.STAPLES SHOULD BE MADE OF 0.125 INCH DIAMETER NEW STEEL WIRE FORMED INTO A 'U'
SHAPE NOT LESS THAN 12 INCHES IN LENGTH WITH A THROAT OF 1 INCH IN WIDTH. THE STAPLES
ANCHOR THE POROUS BAFFLES INTO THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE BASIN.
3. ENSURE THAT STEEL POSTS FOR POROUS BAFFLES ARE OF A SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO SUPPORT
BAFFLES AT DESIRED HEIGHT. POSTS SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 1-3/8" WIDE MEASURED
PARALLEL TO THE FENCE, AND HAVE A MINIMUM WEIGHT OF 1.25 LB/LINEAR FT. THE POSTS MUST
BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ANCHOR PLATE HAVING A MINIMUM AREA OF 14.0 SQUARE INCHES AND
BE OF THE SELF-FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE TO HAVE A MEANS OF RETAINING WIRE AND
COIR FIBER MAT IN THE DESIRED POSITION WITHOUT DISPLACEMENT.
4. USE 9-GAUGE HIGH TENSION WIRE FOR SUPPORT WIRE.
CONSTRUCTION:
1. GRADE THE BASIN SO THAT THE BOTTOM IS LEVEL FRONT TO BACK AND SIDE TO SIDE.
2. INSTALL THE COIR FIBER BAFFLES IMMEDIATELY UPON EXCAVATION OF THE BASINS.
3. INSTALL POSTS ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE SEDIMENT TRAP.
4.STEEL POSTS SHOULD BE DRIVEN TO A DEPTH OF 24 INCHES AND SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 4
FEET APART. THE TOP OF THE FABRIC SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES HIGHER THAN THE
INVERT OF THE SPILLWAY. TOPS OF BAFFLES SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES LOWER THAN
THE TOP OF THE EARTHEN EMBANKMENT.
5. INSTALL AT LEAST THREE ROWS OF BAFFLES BETWEEN THE INLET AND OUTLET DISCHARGE
POINT. BASINS LESS THAN 20 FEET IN LENGTH MAY USE 2 BAFFLES.
6.ATTACH A 9 GAUGE HIGH TENSION WIRE STRAND TO THE STEEL POSTS AT A HEIGHT OF 6
INCHES ABOVE THE SPILLWAY ELEVATION WITH PLASTIC TIES OR WIRE FASTENERS TO PREVENT
SAGGING. IF THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN WILL BE CONVERTED TO A PERMANENT
STORMWATER BASIN OF A GREATER DEPTH, THE BAFFLE HEIGHT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE
POOL DEPTH DURING USE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN.
7. EXTEND 9 GAUGE MINIMUM HIGH TENSION WIRE STRAND TO SIDE OF BASIN OR INSTALL STEEL
T-POSTS TO ANCHOR BAFFLE TO SIDE OF BASIN AND SECURE TO VERTICAL END POSTS.
8.DRAPE THE COIR FIBER MAT OVER THE WIRE STRAND MOUNTED AT A HEIGHT OF 6 INCHES
ABOVE THE SPILLWAY ELEVATION. SECURE THE COIR FIBER MAT TO THE WIRE STRAND WITH
PLASTIC TIES OR WIRE FASTENERS. ANCHOR THE MATTING TO THE SIDES AND FLOOR OF THE
BASIN WITH 12 INCH WIRE STAPLES, APPROXIMATELY 1 FT APART, ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE
SLOPES OF THE BASIN.
9. DO NOT SPLICE THE FABRIC, BUT USE A CONTINUOUS PIECE ACROSS THE BASIN.
10.ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE STAPLING REQUIREMENTS TO FIT INDIVIDUAL SITE
CONDITIONS.
MAINTENANCE:
1. INSPECT BAFFLES AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL. MAKE ANY REQUIRED
REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
2.BE SURE TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO THE BAFFLES. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A BAFFLE COLLAPSE,
TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT PROMPTLY.
3.REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS WHEN IT REACHES HALF FULL, TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE
VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE BAFFLES. TAKE CARE TO
AVOID DAMAGING THE BAFFLES DURING CLEANOUT, AND REPLACE IF DAMAGED DURING
CLEANOUT OPERATIONS. SEDIMENT DEPTH SHOULD NEVER EXCEED HALF THE DESIGNED
STORAGE DEPTH.
4.AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL
BAFFLE MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS, BRING THE AREA TO GRADE, AND
STABILIZE IT.
COIR FIBER BAFFLE MATERIAL PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS (TABLE 6.65A)
THICKNESS
TENSILE STRENGTH (WET)
ELONGATION (WET)
FLOW VELOCITY
WEIGHT
MINIMUM WIDTH
OPEN AREA
900 x 680 LB/FT MINIMUM
0.30 IN. MINIMUM
69% x 34% MAXIMUM
10-12 FT/SEC
20 oz/SY (680 G/M^2) MINIMUM
6.5 FEET
50% MAXIMUM
PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLDETAILSC2-6
WITH PERMANENT WOODY PLANTS.
COIR WATTLE AND WILLOW FASCINES STABALIZING SLOPE
FIGURE2A
FIGURE2B
PROPER PLACEMENT OF COIR WATTLE IN SLOPE
NOTES:
www.CADdetails.comPROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT - 11/06/06
COIR WATTLE: CHECK DAMS IN
SLOPES & WATERWAYS
1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
3. ON DRAINAGE WAY LINED WITH TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) OR EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET (ECB), COIR WATTLE SHAL INSTALLED AS CHECK DAMS (FIG.1).
4. ON UNVEGETATED AND DISTURBED SLOPES OR SLOPES LINED WITH ECB, COIR WATTLE SHALL
BE INSTALLED AS CHECK DAMS (FIG. 2B).
5. CONTRACTORS NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT
http://www.rolanka.com/GN/scWatl.html.
6. 9" WATTLES ANCHOR IN TRENCH 1/4-1/3 ROLL AND SHOW STAKE SPACING.
THE CONTRACTOR MAY
CHOOSE TYPE OF CHECK
DAM TO BE USED.
CHECK DAM MAINTENANCE:PIEDMONT CONCORD LAKEPREPARED FORCAROLINA DEVELOPMENT SERVICESEROSION CONTROLDETAILSC2-7
COMMUNITYCENTERPOOLMAIL KIOSKDUMPSTERDUMPSTERCOMMUNITYGREENSPACE%#4./E%4''/+6%*'..56#0$#%- 16*'45%*#./'45,1*0510,1*0 .+55+'9*+6',1 *0  .+55+'
9 *+6 '/#4;/E0'+.%#41.+0##((14&#$.'*175+0)+0%476*'#40*#4&65/+6*476*'#40*#4&65/+6*%#41.+0##((14&#$.'*175+0)+0%&#44'.. 5*#410$4+)/#041$'46',#%37'5&#8+& -#//;5610'41$'4667%-'4/#4- 5*#410-#;.14%#.+(140+#566'00'55''56%+6;1(-#00#21.+501'%#4&'0#5 8'410+%##)756+0+#01.''%4#9(14&#..;6+0*'+)*657012'0'&56*1..#0&56*1..#0&56-#05#5#8'&#-16##8';1 5 6 #8 '41;#.1#-5/'6*1&+56%*74%*'&&+' %1 0 0 +'&7 4 *#/'&&+' %100+'&74*#/4+%*#4& 9#;0'(156'4'&+6*/E59#+0
61//; 5#0&4#%74.''
..1;& 5#0&4#/'.610
6+/16*;5/+6*1#-%4'56#2#46/'0651(-#00#21.+51#-%4'56#2#46/'0651(-#00#21.+5-#64#)#&&#24#5#00#$/;0'0+5#+.#59+('9#..+' 5;.8+#-+0%#+&-#64#)#&&#24#5#00#$/;0'0+5#+.#59+('476*5/+6*.#-'%1 0 %1 4 &4 &PIEDMONT CONCORDLAKEPREPARED FORTRUE HOMESREZONINGSITE PLAN1©NORTH
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE& CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELDOFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Concord Lake Road
Kannapolis, NC
Cabarrus
56222982940000
Chris Tinklenberg
200 South Tryon St
Suite 200
704-409-1802
[e-mail]
Carolina Development Services, LLC
2649 Brekonridge Centre Dr.
Monroe, NC 28110
704-774-1964
[e-mail]
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 3
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorpsauthority.
Iintendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, andthe JDwould beusedto avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitialstep in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
Iintendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
11/14/2018
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4

F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
48.46
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5

H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
ƒNorth Arrow
ƒGraphical Scale
ƒBoundary of Review Area
ƒDate
ƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.468358
-80.602637
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6

Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJDcannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
S1 35.468225 -80.604114 1,278 lf
non-wetland waters Section 404
W1 35.469110 -80.602014 0.208 ac
wetland waters Section 404
Chris Tinklenberg, 200 South Tryon St. Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Cabarrus County Kannapolis
35.468358 -80.602637
17M
UT to Cold Water Creek
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
1:24,000; Concord
NRCS SSURGO Soils - Cabarrus County
2017 Cabarrus County Aerial
Site photographs, July 2018
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:23.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1
1.5 1 0 1
0 0.5 1.5 0.5
0 0.5 1.5 0
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
3 2 0 3
3 2 0 3
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Intermittent stream above head cut, baseflow was weak, mainly pools
predominately influenced by stormwater runoff from residential areas.
No headcuts were observed in intermittent reach.
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 1
24. Amphibians 1
25. Algae 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)2
21. Aquatic Mollusks 2
22. Fish 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 2
9. Grade control 1
10. Natural valley 1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-
pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 2
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
7/11/2018 Concord Piedmont Lakes / S1-INT 35.468225
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Cabarrus -80.604114
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:Concord
11 Moderate
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
Total Points:35
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 3
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 1
0 0.5 1.5 0.5
0 0.5 1.5 1.5
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 1
1.5 1 0 1.5
0 0.5 1.5 0.5
0 0.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
3 2 0 3
3 2 0 3
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream begins after headcut, presence of baseflow,
iron oxidizing bacteria present, indicating influence of groundwater
in the system
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
7/11/2018 Concord Piedmont Lakes / S1-PER 35.468225
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Cabarrus -80.604114
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:Concord
20 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-
pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 2
9. Grade control 1
10. Natural valley 1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)2
21. Aquatic Mollusks 2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 1
24. Amphibians 1
25. Algae 1
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Piedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Mecklenberg
W1-Up
11/21/2018
Carolina Development Services LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:Chris Tinklenberg, PWS & Addie Lasitter, WPIT
2%ConvexHillside
Datum: NAD 83-80.60183035.469301LRR P, MLRA 136
NANWI classification:IdB - Iredell loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Hydrology indicators are not present on hillslope.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
W1 Up was taken on the hillside located north of W1 Wet, about 10' from W1 Wet and about 2' higher in elevation.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W1-Up
5
9
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50
320
10
95
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FAC
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
55.6%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
20
Ligustrum japonicum
Pinus taeda
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Pinus taeda
Quercus phellos
Prunus serotina
30 )
45
Indicator
Status
30
10
No
Dominant
Species?
Yes
5
5
Yes5
10
Prunus serotina
Rubus allegheniensis
Ligustrum japonicum 5
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FAC
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Vitis rotundifolia
10
2
410
5
Prevalence Index worksheet:
FACU
Total % Cover of:
70
15
(A)
(B)
(A)
Yes
210
0
60
Multiply by:
0
3.37Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
UPL
Yes FACU
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
23 9
5
0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Upland vegetation present
)5
=Total Cover
UPL
FACU
Yes
410
=Total Cover20
Smilax rotundifolia
15 Yes
Yes
FAC
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
Clay
W1-UpSOIL
10-15 10YR 5/6
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/4
10YR 3/3
3-10
0-3
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
W1 Up was taken on the adjacent hillside.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X
X No
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Piedmont Concord Lakes Kannapolis, Mecklenberg
W1-Wet
11/21/2018
Carolina Development Services LLC NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:Chris Tinklenberg, PWS & Addie Lasitter, WPIT
<1%ConcaveDepression
Datum: NAD 83-80.81381535.469181LRR P, MLRA 136
NANWI classification:IdB - Iredell loam
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
2
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Hydrology is primarily influenced by stormater runoff from a local residential areas. Surface flow is likely impounded for some duration following storm
events due to the geomorphic position of W1.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
W1 hydrology is mostly influenced by stormwater originating offisite from residental areas. W1 is bounded by steep upland slopes and a levee,
causing the depression to caputure and hold stormwater drainage. Strong hydrology and vegetation is present within wetland area and hydric soils
typical were observed.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W1-Wet
1
2
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
32
0
13
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
50.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Yes
No
10Polygonum persicaria
3Rubus allegheniensis FACU
Polygonum perfoliatum 10
15
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
23
512
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
3
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
12
Multiply by:
20
2.46Prevalence Index = B/A =
10
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Wetland vegetation seen within and around wetland area.
)5
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
M30
Texture
Clay
20
Clay
W1-WetSOIL
10-18 10YR 4/1
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
100
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
C10YR 5/1
10YR 4/1 5YR 4/6
5YR 4/67-10
0-7
Loc2
70
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
80
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric soild present within W1
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Date
Assessor Name/Organization
Nearest Named Water Body
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
Yes No
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
•
•
•
•
Is the assessment area intensively managed?Yes No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
Anadromous fish
Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
Publicly owned property
N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes)Lu Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island?Yes No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver?Yes No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions?Yes No
1.Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS
A A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2.Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration – assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for
North Carolina hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch
≤ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and ditch
sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf
A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
C C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3.Water Storage/Surface Relief – assessment area/wetland type condition metric (answer for non-marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a.A A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b.A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
Sub
VS
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS (KH)
11/20/2018Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
Piedmont Concord Lakes - Wetland 1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
35.468358, -80.602637
UT to Cold Water Creek
03040105
Level III Ecoregion
River Basin
4.Soil Texture/Structure – assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a.A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b.A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
B Soil ribbon ≥ 1 inch
4c.A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5.Discharge into Wetland – opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
A A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
B B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6.Land Use – opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
A A A ≥ 10% impervious surfaces
B B B < 10% impervious surfaces
C C C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
D D D ≥ 20% coverage of pasture
E E E ≥ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F F F ≥ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
G G G ≥ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
H H H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7.Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer – assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a.Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b.How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
A ≥ 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c.Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
≤ 15-feet wide > 15-feet wide Other open water (no tributary present)
7d.Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes No
7e.Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered – adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed – adjacent open water with width ≥ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8.Wetland Width at the Assessment Area – wetland type/wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment areas (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
A A ≥ 100 feet
B B From 80 to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 80 feet
D D From 40 to < 50 feet
E E From 30 to < 40 feet
F F From 15 to < 30 feet
G G From 5 to < 15 feet
H H < 5 feet
9.Inundation Duration – assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10.Indicators of Deposition – assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11.Wetland Size – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select “K” for the FW column.
WT FW (if applicable)
A A A ≥ 500 acres
B B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D D From 25 to < 50 acres
E E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F F F From 5 to < 10 acres
G G G From 1 to < 5 acres
H H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
I I I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
J J J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
K K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12.Wetland Intactness – wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (≥ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13.Connectivity to Other Natural Areas – landscape condition metric
13a.Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
A A ≥ 500 acres
B B From 100 to < 500 acres
C C From 50 to < 100 acres
D D From 10 to < 50 acres
E E < 10 acres
F F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b.Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14.Edge Effect – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas ≥ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear-cuts.
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16.Vegetative Diversity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).
LooselyWell
WC
17.Vegetative Structure – assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a.Is vegetation present?
Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b.Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
A ≥ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c.Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
A A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
B B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
C C Canopy sparse or absent
A A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
B B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
A A Dense shrub layer
B B Moderate density shrub layer
C C Shrub layer sparse or absent
A A Dense herb layer
B B Moderate density herb layer
C C Herb layer sparse or absent
18.Snags – wetland type condition metric
A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
19.Diameter Class Distribution – wetland type condition metric
A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20.Large Woody Debris – wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
B Not A
21.Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion – wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B C D
22.Hydrologic Connectivity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.Mid-StoryShrubHerbAA WT
Notes Canopy
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Particulate Change Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Soluble Change Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Physical Change Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Pollution Change Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Habitat Physical Structure Condition
Landscape Patch Structure Condition
Vegetation Composition Condition
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes
Hydrology Condition
Water Quality Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Habitat Conditon
Overall Wetland Rating
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Rating
NA
NA
NO
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Wetland Type
Wetland Site Name Piedmont Concord Lakes - Wetland 1
hris Tinklenberg, PWS (KNon-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Date
Assessor Name/Organization
11/20/2018
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NO
MEDIUM
NA
HIGH
LOW
Rating
HIGH
MEDIUM
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NA
NA
NA
NO
Photo Page 1

Photo 1: Stream 1 (S1) – UT to Cold Water Creek (intermittent) facing upstream near the northwestern corner of
the project boundary.

Photo 2: S1 facing downstream.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 2

Photo 3: S1 - Head cut at intermittent and perennial break.

Photo 4: S1 (perennial) facing downstream.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 3

Photo 5: S1 (perennial) facing upstream, near southwestern portion of the site.

Photo 6: Wetland 1 (W1) – Non-riparian, freshwater emergent wetland. Notice inundated conditions and absent
woody vegetation.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 4

Photo 7: Wetland 1 (W1) – Pond breach, located on the southern portion of wetland, facing north towards wetland
area.

Photo 8: Stormwater drainage feature facing north, with wetland immediately to the south. Feature drains into
wetland area, note diffuse flow, organic debris within channel, lack of OHWM, and lack of continuous bed and
bank.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002

Photo Page 5

Photo 9: Stormwater drainage feature facing north, with wetland to the south. Feature drains into wetland area, note
diffuse flow, organic debris within channel, lack of OHWM, and lack of continuous bed and bank.

Photo 10: Stormwater drainage facing south immediately south of wetland, towards open area. Note evidence of
diffuse flow and leaf debris within channel.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 6

Photo 11: Representative soil profile of wetland soil.

Photo 12: Representative soil profile of upland soil.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 7

Photo 13: Stormwater drainage facing north towards open area near southern portion of the site, note evidence of
diffuse flow, organic debris within channel, lack of OHWM, and lack of continuous bed and bank.

Photo 14: Stormwater drainage facing south within trees near center area of site. Note evidence of diffuse flow,
organic debris within channel, lack of OHWM, and stems within channel.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 8

Photo 15: Stormwater drainage facing northwest note evidence of diffuse flow, debris within channel, lack of
OHWM, and lack of continuous bed and bank.

Photo 16: Stormwater drainage facing south (towards Clemson Ct.) within trees on edge of project boundary. Note
evidence of diffuse flow, organic debris within channel, lack of OHWM.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002
Photo Page 9

Photo 17: Stormwater drainage from residential area (Holland St.), note hummocky terrain and organic debris
within channel. Located within forested areas located near northern boundary.

Title Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project Piedmont Concord Lakes
Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Prepared By
Carolina
Development
Services, LLC
Date Project Number
11/21/18 014005002

November 20, 2018

Johnathan McCall
Carolina Development Services, LLC
2649 Breckenridge Center Drive
Monroe, NC 28110 Expiration of Acceptance: 5/20/2019

Project: Piedmont Concord Lakes County: Cabarrus This is a conditional acceptance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in-lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.

This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant’s responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of
the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made
prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in-lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated
based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.

Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location
(8-digit HUC) Impact Type Impact Quantity
Yadkin 03040105 Non-Riparian Wetland 0.208

*DMS does not have non-riparian wetland credit available in this service area. In accordance with the
directive from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non-riparian wetland impacts located in the mountains
and piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian
wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the
compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In-Lieu Fee Program
instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS
in-lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly
Williams at [phone]. Sincerely,

FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor

cc: Chris Tinklenberg, agent
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2018-SLI-0572
Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533
Project Name: Concord Lakes

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes “species of concern” species that could
potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also
available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant_survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
July 03, 2018
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   2

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/assessment_guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow
the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   3

www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
▪Official Species List
▪Migratory Birds
▪Wetlands
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   2

Project Summary
Consultation Code:04EN1000-2018-SLI-0572
Event Code:04EN1000-2018-E-01533
Project Name:Concord Lakes
Project Type:DEVELOPMENT
Project Description:Development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.46797795871104N80.60209757755646W
Counties:Cabarrus, NC
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   3

Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1.NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Threatened
Clams
NAME STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
Endangered
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Endangered
1
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   4

Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   1

Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1.The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2.The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3.50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
1
2
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   2

NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds
elsewhere
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ “Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1.The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2.To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3.The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ()
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   3

Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC Vulnerable
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
▪Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
▪Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
▪Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   4

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E-bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   5

project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1."BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2."BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3."Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location”. Please be
aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   6

overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no
data” indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
07/03/2018 Event Code: 04EN1000-2018-E-01533   1

Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
FRESHWATER POND
▪PUBHh
RIVERINE
▪R4SBC
▪R5UBH
Concord Lakes
City of Charlotte, County of Cabarrus, State of North Carolina DOT,
Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS
NR Points
NR Individual Listing
NR Listing, Gone
NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
National Register Boundary
Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
SL Points
SL Individual Entry
SL and DOE entry
Study List Entry, Gone
SL and DOE, Gone
SLHD Center Point
July 3, 2018
0 0.25 0.50.13 mi
0 0.4 0.80.2 km
1:11,823
NCNHDE-6384
July 3, 2018
Chris Tinklenberg
Kimley-Horn
200 South Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: Concord Lakes
Dear Chris Tinklenberg:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally-listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Concord Lakes
July 3, 2018
NCNHDE-6384
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last
Observation
Date
Element
Occurrence
Rank
Accuracy Federal
Status
State
Status
Global
Rank
State
Rank
Vascular Plant 21130 Acmispon helleri Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 1998-06-10 X?2-High ---Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G5T3 S3
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on July 3, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Page 3 of 3