20181462 Ver 1_DRAFT Mitigation Plan_20181030

ID#* 20181462 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Mitigation Project Submittal -10/30/2018
Type of Mitigation Project:*
W Stream W Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? * r Yes f No
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner:* Weyerhaeuser
Contact Name:*
Daren Pait
Project Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Project Name: Craven 26 - DRAFT Mitigation Plan - Middle
Neuse UMBI
Project Type:* r DMS
r Mitigation Bank
County: Craven
Document Information
File Upload: Craven 26 - DRAFT Mitigation Plan - 2018-09-
65.38MB
13.pdf
Rease upload only one RDF of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Daren Pait
Signature:*
R ��

I
I
SPONSORED BY:
SUBMITTED TO:
PREPARED BY:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Interagency Review Team
Kimley>>)Horn
AND �Assetn
Management,,,

THE MIDDLE NEUSE STREAM AND
WETLAND UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
Middle Neuse River Basin — HUC 03020202
Craven County, North Carolina
USACE ACTION ID NUMBER:
SAW -2017-02019
Sponsor:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Attn: Doug Hughes
406 Cole Road
Hattiesburg, MS 39402
601 341 6054
PREPARED BY:
Kimley>))Horn
Attn: Daren Pait, P.E., CFM
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
704 319 7699
Coggin Asset Management, LLC
Attn: Daniel S. Coggin
P.O. Box 476
Amory, MS 38821
662 825 0058
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33 Navigation and Navigable
Waters Volume 3, Chapter 2, Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c) (14).
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Project Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Project Description..............................................................................................................
5
1.2 Site Selection......................................................................................................................
6
1.3 Mitigation Site Location, Size, and Service Area................................................................
7
1.4 Ownership...........................................................................................................................
7
2.0
Watershed Approach....................................................................................................................... 9
2.1 Watershed environmental concerns and mitigation needs.................................................9
2.2 Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................... 9
2.3 Assurance of Sufficient Water Rights, Control of Minerals, and Access ..........................
10
2.4 Site Protection...................................................................................................................
10
3.0
Site Baseline..................................................................................................................................11
3.1 Existing Watershed Conditions.........................................................................................
11
3.2 Existing Site Conditions....................................................................................................
11
4.0
Functional Uplift Potential..............................................................................................................14
5.0
Mitigation Plan................................................................................................................................16
5.1 Reference Site and Design Parameters...........................................................................
16
5.2 Mitigation Work Plan.........................................................................................................
18
6.0
Determination Of Credits................................................................................................................
25
6.1 Stream Mitigation Credit Calculations...............................................................................
25
6.2 Wetland Mitigation Credit Calculations.............................................................................
25
7.0
Credit Release Schedule...............................................................................................................
26
8.0
Monitoring Plan..............................................................................................................................
27
8.1 Stream Monitoring Requirements.....................................................................................
27
8.2 Wetland Monitoring Requirements....................................................................................28
8.3 Performance Standards....................................................................................................
28
8.4 Early Closure Provision.....................................................................................................29
8.5 Adaptive Management Plan..............................................................................................29
8.6 Post -Construction Documentation....................................................................................
29
8.7 Long -Term Management Plan..........................................................................................
29
8.8 Financial Assurances........................................................................................................
29
9.0
References.....................................................................................................................................31
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

TABLES
Table 1 —
Site Mitigation Potential Summary.................................................................................................................6
Table 2 —
Wetland Mitigation Summary.........................................................................................................................6
Table3 —
Watershed Overview....................................................................................................................................11
Table4 —
Existing Wetlands.........................................................................................................................................13
Table 5 -
Stream Mitigation Work Plan.........................................................................................................................14
Table 6 —
Distribution of Intermittent and Perennial Origin Contributing Drainage Area (acre)....................................18
Table7 -
Mitigation Approach......................................................................................................................................19
Table8 —
Wetland Summary........................................................................................................................................23
Table9 —
Proposed Buffer Widths...............................................................................................................................23
Table 10
— Zone 1 planting summary...........................................................................................................................24
Table11
— Zone 2 Planting Summary..........................................................................................................................24
Table12
— Zone 3 Planting Summary..........................................................................................................................24
Table 13
— Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits...........................................................................................................25
Table 14
— Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits.........................................................................................................25
Table 15
— Credit Release Schedule - Streams...........................................................................................................26
Table 16
— Credit Release Schedule - Wetlands..........................................................................................................26
Table 17
— Vegetative Monitoring Plots........................................................................................................................27
Table 18
— Estimated Amount Required for Performance Bond..................................................................................30
Table 19
— Performance Bond Reduction Schedule....................................................................................................30
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

APPENDICES
Appendix A
— Figures
Appendix B
— Photo Pages
Appendix C
— Geomorphic Cross -Sections
Appendix D
— Geomorphology
Appendix E
— Buffer Credit Calculations
Appendix F
— Mitigation Plan Sheets
Appendix G
— NCSAM Forms
Appendix H
— Wetland and Stream Data Forms
Appendix I —
Conservation Easement Documents
Appendix J —
Performance Bond
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Craven 26 Mitigation Site ("C26 Site" or "Site") is in Craven County, NC and consists of three
separate tributaries that include headwater restoration and stream and wetland systems restoration,
enhancement, and preservation. The on-site headwater systems and stream channels will be restored
using a holistic approach that seeks to restore or enhance the valley and riparian wetlands adjacent to the
stream channels. This site is proposed to be included in the Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella
Mitigation Bank (the "Middle Neuse UMBI"). The Site is identified as having potential to help meet the
compensatory mitigation requirement for stream and freshwater wetland impacts in Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03020202 of the Neuse River Basin. It was selected based on the Site's ability to provide
improvements to aquatic resources within the Middle Neuse 8 -digit HUC through a combination of
restoration, enhancement, and preservation.
All mitigation areas within the Site will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement as
described in the Middle Neuse UMBI. The Site has a combined conservation easement of 42.7 acres,
including the stream systems, riparian buffer, and riparian wetlands. Most of the on-site streams were
historically impacted by extensive ditching and currently have diminished functionality within any or all the
five functional categories identified in the stream functional pyramid (Harman, Starr, Tweedy, Clemmon,
Suggs, Miller. 2012). Based on these areas of impacted functionality and potential for functional uplift, this
Mitigation Plan has been produced identifying 6,625 linear feet of headwater and stream enhancement
and restoration and 0.24 acres of riparian wetland enhancement. Tables 1 and 2 (on the following page)
summarize the mitigation activities and credit generation for the C26 Site.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

Table 1 — Stream
19
Proposed
Mitigation Begin End
Existing Length
Credit
1W
Length
g
SMUs
Approach Station Station
(ft.)
Ratio
A
(ft.)
UT1 - R1 Restoration 1+07 15+71
1,149
1,464
1:1
1,464
Craven UT1 - R2 Restoration 15+71 47+66
2,727
3,195
1:1
3,195
26 UT2
Enhancement
100+00 109+40
814
940
2.5:1
376
Headwater 200+00 210+26
UT3
1,084
915
1:1
1,026
Restoration
Total stream lengths and sub -total SMU's
5,774
6,625
6,061
BUFFER ADJUSTMENT TO STREAM CREDITS
800
(SEE "WILMINGTON DISTRICT STREAM BUFFER CREDIT CALCULATOR" WORKSHEETS
IN APPENDIX
E)
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS (SMU's)
6,861
Table 2 — Wetland Mitigation Summary
Adjacent to Mitigation Mitigation Area
Reach Approach (ac.)
W3 UT3 Enhancement Low 0.24
TOTAL WETLAND CREDITS (WMU's)
1.2 SITE SELECTION
Wetland
Mitigation Ratio
3:1 0.08
0.08
As part of the Middle Neuse UMBI, the C26 Site is proposed to provide compensatory mitigation for
permitted impacts within the Middle Neuse Watershed (HUC 03020202). The larger Neuse River Basin
has been a focal point for water quality concerns for almost three decades due to sediment disturbances
in upstream rural development as well as nutrient loading from upstream agricultural land use.
Development within this basin is predicted to increase—especially with the proposed Kinston Bypass
construction, which will likely increase development around the proposed interchanges. As such, the C26
Site aims to provide protection and the potential for significant water quality and aquatic habitat
improvements in this sensitive region through the restoring and conserving of aquatic resources in the
Middle Neuse. The C26 Site was identified as a strong candidate for mitigation based on its potential for
uplift as well as the following criteria as originally documented in the prospectus phase:
Access—Potential sites must have permanent, deeded access.
Proximity to Impacts—Potential sites must be within the 8 -digit HUC in which impacts are
anticipated to occur.
Watershed Impact—Restoring, enhancing, and protecting a potential site must contribute to the
overall improvement of the watershed in which it is found.
Restoration Potential—Potential sites must have a combination of wetland and stream
restoration, enhancement, and/or preservation. Sites with historical alterations, such as
silviculture, will generally be given priority for development.
Habitat Connectivity—Potential sites must contribute to creating larger, contiguous conservation
properties to help support habitat diversity, quality, and stability.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT h
September 2018 1

• Sufficient Water Rights/Resources—Potential sites must have sufficient water rights/resources to
sustain restored, enhanced, and/or protected wetlands and streams.
• Mineral Rights—The Bank Sponsor must own/control the surface mineral rights, including gravel,
sand, salt, and coal.
1.3 MITIGATION SITE LOCATION, SIZE, AND SERVICE AREA
The C26 Site is in Craven County, North Carolina, at 35.1231' North, -77.2187° East (see Figure 1). The
Site is approximately 10 miles west of New Bern, and may be accessed from Farrow Road off Tuscarora
Rhems Rd, approximately 2.5 miles south of U.S. Highway 70. The Site has a conservation easement of
42.7 -acres and includes the restoration and enhancement of approximately 6,625 -linear feet of
headwater, intermittent, and perennial stream systems and enhancement of 0.24 acres of riparian
wetlands.
The Site is in the Headwaters Bachelor Creek sub -basin of the Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC
030202020605) and the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Ecoregion. The Site sits in the Department of Water
Resources (DWR) Sub -basin 03-04-08. HUC 03020202 is situated downstream of both HUC 03020201,
which contain Raleigh and Durham, and HUC 03020203, which includes Smithfield, Goldsboro, Farmville
and other heavily agricultural areas. The local Headwaters Bachelor Creek sub -basin is predominantly
timber production with some agriculture, and very little existing commercial, industrial, or residential
development.
The C26 Site, as a mitigation site under the framework of the Middle Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Bank
("Bank"), is proposed to produce credits that will be used to offset permitted impacts to aquatic resources
within the Bank's service area. The service area associated with the C26 Site is defined as the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) 8 -digit HUC within which the Site is located - the Middle Neuse 02 HUC
(HUC 03020202).
1.4 OWNERSHIP
BANK OWNER, SPONSOR, AND LONG-TERM STEWARD
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Contact: Doug Hughes
Address: 406 Cole Road
Hattiesburg, MS 39402
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
As the landowner, Weyerhaeuser NR Company will provide access to the property for establishment
(including granting the conservation easement), operation, management of the Site, and long-term
management of the property within the framework of the Middle Neuse UMBI. The owner will retain all
rights and responsibilities of ownership subject to the terms of the conservation easement (included as
Appendix 1), which shall be placed on the property prior to the first release of mitigation credits.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

As the Bank Sponsor, Weyerhaeuser NR Company maintains the rights to permit, develop, maintain, and
operate the Middle Neuse Bank and its associated sites, including The Craven 26 Mitigation Site, in
accordance with the terms of the Middle Neuse UMBI and this Mitigation Plan and subject to the terms
and conditions of the conservation easement that will be established over the property.
As the long-term steward, Weyerhaeuser NR Company will be responsible for maintenance of the Site's
aquatic resources as described in the Long -Term Management Plan, in Section 8.7 of this document.
Long-term stewardship responsibilities will begin at the end of the Site's operational phase (after all
credits are released and sold) and continue in perpetuity.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT HOLDER
The conservation easement will be held by Unique Places to Save, a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit conservation
organization located in North Carolina. A copy of the conservation easement document is included as
Appendix I.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

2.1 WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND MITIGATION NEEDS
The Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020202) has been significantly impacted by agricultural land
uses, extensive ditching, and lack of riparian buffer. Development within this basin is predicted to
increase, especially with construction of the Kinston Bypass. This bypass will increase mobility in the area
and spur development around proposed interchanges, likely creating additional impacts to the area. The
Middle Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020202) consists of 1,008 square miles with more than 340 miles of
stream and is primed for significant local growth. Between the five counties that make up the watershed
(Beaufort, Craven, Lenoir, Pitt, and Wayne Counties), Pitt County is forecasted to grow by 5.8% by 2020,
and Wayne County is expected to grow by 4.1 %**. Overall, the Middle Neuse watershed is expected to
see 0.23% growth by 2020. The C26 Site represents a valuable opportunity to restore natural streams
and headwater systems to offer long-term protection to essential habitat and aquatic resources as growth
and development comes to the area.
The Site's goals and objectives described below are consistent in addressing the major stressors
identified in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) document produced by the North
Carolina Department of Mitigation Services (NCDMS).
**https://files.nc.gov/ncosbm/demog/countygrowth 2020.htm1
2.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
WATERSHED SCALE GOALS
The Neuse RBRP 2010 document produced by the NCDMS spells out the Middle Neuse Basin
restoration and protection goals. Applicable goals stated are as follows:
• Promote nutrient and sediment reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving
wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers.
• Continue targeted implementation of projects under the Nutrient Offset and Buffer programs, as
well as focusing Department of Transportation (DOT) -sponsored restoration in areas where they
will provide the ecosystem's most functional improvement.
Mitigation proposed as part of the C26 Site addresses these specific RBRP goals. A significant length of
stream mitigation, wetland mitigation, and riparian corridor enhancement and preservation will improve
water quality within the Middle Neuse basin. Additionally, these projects are being implemented now to
offset future impacts that could occur as part of the Kinston Bypass construction and future development
that may occur because of the roadway improvements.
SITE-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
• Fill ditches that currently are draining headwater valley systems and reestablish the historic
headwater valley system to accomplish the following:
o Restore hydrology to the headwater valley system to enhance and restore wetland systems
within the headwaters
o Restore original headwater stream system to provide more frequent flooding of the adjacent
headwater wetlands and valley
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

o Supplement existing trees and roots in headwater systems with appropriate vegetation to
encourage stabilized flow paths through restored headwater systems
o Restore native riparian buffers
o Restore native wetland vegetation
• Restore intermittent and perennial streams with a Priority 1 restoration approach to:
o Reestablish the restored channel to the center of its valley and restore appropriate pattern,
dimension, and profile and reconnect the channel's frequent flood flows with the adjacent
floodplain as a result
o As part of elevating the stream through a Priority 1 approach, enhance and restore adjacent
riparian wetland hydrology. This also will address the cross-sectional dimensions of the
channel to return it to a stream hydraulically connected to its floodplain versus its current
ditched and disconnected/incised state.
o Restore profile and habitat diversity by reestablishing riffle and pool sequences (i.e., habitat
transitions) throughout the restored stream systems to provide depth variability.
o Establish a 150 -foot -wide vegetated buffer to each site of the stream restoration and
enhancement reaches.
o Establish and/or protect a minimum 50 -foot -wide vegetated buffer to each side of the
headwater reaches.
o Provide additional buffer, outside the required 50 feet along restored headwater systems, to
protect enhanced, restored and preserved wetlands.
• Where possible, preserve channel reaches to provide a contiguous riparian corridor throughout
the site to allow connectivity between all three tributaries.
• Reestablish natural overland flow patterns within the adjacent buffers by removing silviculture
planting rows and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within the buffer.
• Restore natural topography in the floodplains, including minor depression and mounds that will
promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats.
• Restore or enhance site wetland hydrology by promoting storage of surface water, increasing
surface ponding and infiltration, discouraging drainage, and imposing a higher water table across
the floodplain and wetlands.
2.3 ASSURANCE OF SUFFICIENT WATER RIGHTS, CONTROL OF
MINERALS, AND ACCESS
Sufficient water rights exist to support the long-term sustainability of the Site. There are no "severed"
rights on the property.
2.4 SITE PROTECTION
In accordance with Section X (Site Protection) found in the Middle Neuse LIMBI, the Bank Sponsor,
Weyerhaeuser NR Company, plans to protect the site by applying a conservation easement. A copy of
the conservation easement document is included as Appendix I.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

EXISTING WATERSHED CONDITIONS
There are three tributaries proposed for mitigation as part of the C26 Site (UT1, UT2 and UT3). The
watershed for UT3 originates on-site. Silviculture is the primary land use within the watersheds of all three
tributaries. Watershed summary information and drainage areas for each separate system are provided in
the table below and a map showing drainage areas is included as Figure 6.
Table 3 - Watershed Uverview
Level IV Ecoregion 63e Mid -Atlantic Flatwoods
River Basin Neuse
USGS 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit
03020202
USGS 12 -digit Hydrologic Unit
030202020605
DWR Sub -Basin
03-04-08
Project Drainage Area
UTI - Reach 1
1,187 Ac
UT1 - Reach 2 I 1,765 Ac
UT2 408 Ac
UT3 65 Ac
These watersheds sit within the Carolina Flatwoods Ecoregion (Level IV), which occur in the nearly level
coastal plain with frequently high-water tables and large areas of poorly drained soil. While the watershed
currently is occupied by significant plantations of loblolly pine forests, the large areas of loamy, organic
soils historically were home to significant biological diversity compared to the Mid -Atlantic Flatwood region
to the north. Restoring and preserving headwater systems is especially valuable to the health and water
quality of the watershed because of its shallow topography.
3.2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE WATFR CLASSIFICATION
The tributaries on site contribute to Bachelor Creek downstream, a Class C water with additional
designations of nutrient sensitive (NSW) and swamp (Sw). Bachelor Creek is a tributary to The Gut. While
Bachelor Creek is currently supporting its use classification, the Neuse River estuary is impaired at the
confluence of The Gut and the Neuse River.
SITE SOILS
The on-site soils are derived from deposits on marine terraces within the coastal plain. These soils were
deposited between the Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs, where ocean levels were high enough to form
flat terraces across the coast of North America and deposit marine sands, silts, and clays. The on-site
soils are described by site section and soil type below. The soils that occur on-site are presented in
Figure 4 and hydric soils are shown in Figure 5.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

Craven 26 Soils
Craven Silt Loam
Craven Silt Loam is a soil formed from clayey marine deposits on the flats of ancient marine terraces
along the coastal plain. Craven Silt Loam has a low hydric rating of 6 and a water table ranging between
2 and 3 feet below the surface of the surface. The soil profile consists of a fine sandy loam layer from the
ground surface to a depth of 9 inches, followed by a clay layer to a depth of 54 inches and a sandy loam
layer down to the 80 -inch soil core bottom.
Leaf Silt Loam
Leaf Silt Loam (La) soils predominantly exist on terraces that form on broad interstream divides and
consist of clayey marine deposits. The profile is made up of 0 to 6 inches of silt loam, a depth from 6 to 67
inches of clay, and a final depth from 67 to 80 inches of clay loam (end of profile). This soil type is poorly
drained and trends with a 0-2% slope. It has a hydric rating of 90. Leaf soil occurs on-site in the lower
portion of the Pollard Swamp reach.
Lenoir Silt Loam
Lenoir silt loam soils are poorly drained and form on marine terraces and in broad interstream divides.
The soil has a hydric rating of 8, with a water table between 1 and 3 feet below the surface and
significantly varying hydraulic conductivity. The soil profile consists of a layer down to 8 inches
predominantly of loam, followed by a layer down to 63 inches of clay. The final layer is from 63 to 80
inches below the surface consisting of sandy clay.
Lynchburg Fine Sandy Loam
Lynchburg Fine Sandy Loam soils form from loamy marine deposits, and has a soil profile made up on
fine sandy loam from 0-9 inches, medium sandy loam 9-14 inches, a medium sandy clay loam from 14 to
65 inches, and clay from 65-80 inches (end of profile). The water table fluctuates from 6 to 18 inches
below the water surface and has a hydric rating of 10.
Rains Fine Sandy Loam
Rains Fine Sandy Loam soils are highly hydric and are made up of Loamy marine deposits formed on
marine terraces along the Coastal Plain. The soil profile consists of fine sandy loam in depths from 0-16
inches and sandy clay loam from 16-80 inches (end of profile). The soil profile is poorly drained but with
high hydraulic conductivity. The water table fluctuates between 0 and 12 inches of the water surface the
Rains soil has a hydric rating of 92.
BASELINE STREAM CONDITIONS
Descriptions of each existing reach condition are outlined below. Figure 6 provides drainage area
acreages for each reach and Table 1 provides existing lengths. Additionally, representative photos are
included in Appendix B.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Craven 26
UT1 — Reaches 1 and 2
UT1 Reaches 1 and 2 have been extensively ditched and have bank height ratios between 4.0 and 7.0.
Cross sections of the existing reaches are included in Appendix C of this report. Both reaches of UT1
have no access to their floodplain except during larger flood events such as 10 -year flood events.
Because these systems are so entrenched flood flows larger than the channel forming flow are contained
within the ditched system and result in increased lateral shear stress, causing erosion, and resulting in
vertical shear stress, resulting in bed scour and lack of permanent riffle pool sequence features. Due
largely in part to this extreme level of incision the NC SAM score for both reaches is Low. Historically
UT1 was a shallow meandering E -type stream channel that meandered through its valley. Currently, due
to the incised and ditched nature of the channel, it is disconnected from its historic floodplain, lacks
natural meander pattern, and lacks bedform diversity.
UT2
UT2 has an NC SAM rating of Low due to its incised state and because it has been straightened and
ditched in the past. The channel lacks appropriate bedform diversity and only has a narrow buffer of
about 20 feet wide to either side of the channel. Berms and spoil piles also exist adjacent to the channel
along both banks, preventing access to the adjacent floodplain. A cross section of the existing channel is
included in Appendix C, an NC SAM form is included in Appendix G, and photos can be found in
Appendix B.
UT3
Historically, UT3 was a headwater system that has been altered by silviculture activities and some
sections of the reach have been ditched to drain the adjacent valley bottom. Due to the alterations within
the valley bottom, within the headwater system channel, and planting rows that exist perpendicular to the
channel, the North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) score for this reach is Low. NC SAM
forms for each on-site reach are included in Appendix G.
BASELINE WETLAND CONDITIONS
All areas within the Craven 26 Site boundaries have been field reviewed and existing wetlands have been
delineated. Data forms are included in Appendix H. While large portions of riparian areas along all three
tributaries have hydric soils and, historically, have been headwater and riparian wetlands, many of these
areas are non -jurisdictional due to the extensive ditching and incised stream channels that exist on-site.
The table below provides an overview of wetland resources on the Site. Figure 5 shows existing hydric
soils and Figure 7 shows the jurisdictional areas as delineated adjacent to all three tributaries. The
presence of wetlands on each of these systems is dependent on headwater system hydrology and some
are more dependent on floodplain connectivity and overland flow for hydrology. Most of these systems
have been impacted through ditching the headwater systems as well as ditching and extreme incision
along the downstream intermittent and perennial stream systems.
Table 4 — Existin Wetlands
W1
Craven
W
26 2
W3
Wetland Type
Riparian Wetland
Riparian Wetland
Riparian Wetland
Wetland Acreage
0.6 Ac.
0.1 Ac.
2.1 Ac.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

Based on data and observations collected from the watershed analysis, site visits, and reference material,
Table 5 was produced to outline potential uplift and a work plan associated with the uplift of each design
consideration. These parameters, and their associated design considerations, have been developed to fit
under the framework of the Harman Stream Functions Pyramid. Maximum practical uplift potential for
each functional level, including stream hydrology, hydraulics, geomorphology, physical chemistry, and
biology, were scrutinized based on the existing conditions and limitations associated with adjacent land
use, watershed condition, and landscape variables. The content of this mitigation plan was guided by
these observed functional uplift areas to best serve the project and improve overall site conditions.
Table 5 - Stream Mitigation Work Plan
Design Consideration
Work Plan (if not functioning or functioning at -risk)
Hydrologic Function
Flow Dynamics
Restore multi -zone hardwood and vegetative buffer to slow overland
Overland Flow
flow and reduce sedimentation. Identify areas of concentrated flow
Surface Flow and
such as lateral ditches that enter the proposed conservation
Watershed Contribution
easement and fill these ditches and locations of concentrated flow.
Vegetative Buffer
Also, implement vernal pool or pocket wetlands to dissipate energy
and slow water entering the conservation easement.
Groundwater/Surface
Hydraulic Function
Bank Height Ratios
Restore natural bankfull dimensions and reestablish hydrologic
(BHR)
access to the floodplain by raising existing channel bottoms or
designing new channel with appropriate base width and bankfull
Entrenchment Ratio
dimensions based on regional curves and reference reach data. The
Floodplain Connectivity (ER)
primary approach throughout all reaches is to reconnect the channel
to its historic floodplain by filling in ditches through headwater
Dimensionless Rating
systems and implementing Priority 1 restoration where feasible.
Curve
Floodplains and adjacent wetlands will be restored to promote the
Transport and Storage
storage and infiltration of surface water.
Bankfull Velocity Reduce channel erosion and stabilize sediment transport within the
channel by selecting bankfull dimensions and channel
Bankfull Shear Stress geomorphology to optimize stream power and velocity, and
Flow Dynamics
minimize negative impacts from excess shear stress. Changes to the
dimensions of the channels will include construction of a channel
Bankfull Stream Power with appropriate bank height ratios (1.0) and appropriate bedform
diversity to dissipate energy across the floodplain and channel.
Reestablish channel pattern and profile, removing existing ditches
Meander Width Ratios that drain surrounding groundwater areas. Raised groundwater
Groundwater/Surface
conditions along the stream banks restores hyporheic zones and
allows for groundwater and surface water exchange. Floodplains and
Water Exchange
adjacent wetlands will be restored to promote the storage and
Bedform diversity infiltration of surface water. Priority 1 combined with decreasing
floodplain drainage will restore a higher water table across the site.
Geomorphic Function
Reestablish hardwood buffer along riparian zone to provide shade,
Large Woody Debris
Large woody debris
Transport and Storage
compared to reference detritus, and large and small woody debris to supplement habitat
I
provided by in -stream structures in the channel and buffer area.
The Middle Neuse Stream
and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

Rosgen Stream Channel
Succession Scenarios
Design new channel with intentional P -P spacing, radius of curvature,
(2010)
Channel Evolution
riffle slopes, and bankfull dimensions to regulate channel type and
Simon Channel
development.
Evolution Model Stages
(1989)
Meander Width Ratios
Design channels with appropriate width -to -depth ratios and
Bank Migration/
Bank Erosion Hazard
meander widths, as well as radius of curvature, to prevent unnatural
Index (BEHI)
bank erosion and excess sedimentation. Plant stabilizing vegetation
Lateral Stability
and live stakes on the banks to reduce bank recession and
Width -to -Depth Ratios
sedimentation.
Varying widths of vegetative buffers will provide valuable hydrologic
and hydraulic benefits to the overbank and transitional areas of the
Riparian Vegetation
Vegetative Buffer
stream reaches and headwater systems, including stabilization,
energy dissipation, and natural habitat.
Percent Riffle
Provide mechanism for channel bedform revitalization through
Bed -form Diversity
Pool -to -Pool Spacing
appropriate channel profile and dimensions that will subsequently
Depth Variability
alter sediment deposition, transport, and channel stability.
Introducing proper pool -to -pool spacing and riffle/ripple grades will
support deposition of sediment and establishment of stable natural
Bed Material
Bed Material
channel bed material. Additionally, wood structures such as log
Characterization
Composition Relative to
vanes, log cross vanes, brush and roll riffles, and toe wood will be
Reference
used to provide immediate bedform diversity creating habitat
transitions like references
Physicochemical Function
Establish vegetative buffer to decrease sediment erosion from
overbank areas and from incoming surface flow from outside of the
Vegetative Buffer and
conservation easement. The buffer also will reduce runoff velocities,
Water Quality
Bank Stability
decreasing potential to erode channel banks. Regrading and planting
channel banks (where applicable) will reduce the potential for bank
erosion and further reduce sediment loading.
Establish riparian buffer along headwater systems, as well as
Establish Riparian
ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams within the
Water Temperature
Buffer
conservation easement. Narrowing low flow when channel is
overwide will further reduce temperature.
In -Stream Riffle
Reestablish appropriate channel dimensions and pool -to -pool
Structures
spacing to restore groundwater to surface water exchange in the
Nutrients
channel banks and revitalize hyporheic zones where micro bacteria
Profile and Bankfull
breakdown and consume complex nutrients from fertilizers, like
Dimensions
nitrates into atmospheric Nitrogen.
Biological Function
Aquatic Habitat
Revitalize riparian buffer conditions, install instream structures for
stability and habitat (brush and roll rifles, brush toe, log vanes, and
Wetland Habitat
Aquatic organism
log cross vanes), and raise channel bed to reconnect flow to the
communities
Groundwater and
floodplain and enhance hyporheic activity. The installation of riffle
Surface Water
structures provides areas for aquatic habitat, as well as areas for
Connectivity
turbulence that oxygenates water.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
M
I September 2018

5.1 REFERENCE SITE AND DESIGN PARAMETERS
Design of the proposed restoration and enhancement reaches within the C26 Site were based on multiple
considerations and sources of design parameters. The following were used for the stream and wetland
design:
• Four reference stream sites located within the Carolina Flatwoods level -IV ecoregion
• Relic channels and wetland systems at the Beaufort 56 Site (56B, UT1-Reach 5)
• Multiple coastal plain regional curves and accompanying data
• Current USACE and NCDMS guidelines/design parameters
Searches were conducted upstream/downstream of the Site and into surrounding watersheds to find
suitable references that contained similarities to the Site streams including level IV physiographic
ecoregion, drainage area, valley slope, and morphology. No reference reaches were identified
immediately upstream or downstream of the site or in the surrounding watershed. Four reference reaches
from multiple reference databases (NCDOT and Sweet/Geratz) were selected outside of the watershed
but within the Carolina Flatwoods level -IV physiographic eco -region. The reference reaches were
selected to represent the probable configurations for the proposed streams. The data shown in Table 6
helped to provide a basis for evaluating the project site and determining the stream systems that may
have been present historically and/or how they may have been influenced by changes within the
watershed. A description of each reference reach is included below. Geomorphic parameters for these
reference reaches are summarized in Appendix D.
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds. While reference
reach data can be a useful aid in designing channel dimension, pattern, and profile, there are limitations
in smaller stream systems. The flow patterns and channel formation for most reference reach quality
streams is often controlled by slope, drainage areas, groundwater inputs and larger trees and/or other
deep-rooted vegetation. Some meander geometry parameters, such as radius of curvature, are
particularly affected by vegetation control. Pattern ratios observed in reference reaches may not be
applicable or are often adjusted in the design criteria to create designs that are less likely to erode
immediately after construction, before the permanent vegetation is established.
REFERENCE STREAM REACHES
Beaverdam Branch
The Beaverdam Branch reference reach is located approximately 1,000 ft downstream of SR 1119
outside Trenton, NC in Jones county. Beaverdam Branch is classified as a Rosgen E5 stream type. The
stream flows through a wide wooded swamp floodplain with a valley slope of 0.1 %-0.4% and sinuosity of
1.9. Most of floodplain would be considered wetland with numerous seeps and side tributaries. The 3.0
square mile watershed is mostly agricultural (70.4% cultivated) with the remainder being bottomland
forest/hardwood swamps, shrublands, mixed upland hardwoods, and some single-family residences.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Black Branch
Black Branch is in Craven County just north-west of New Bern off SR 1101, within Croatan National
Forest. This site was classified as a blackwater E stream type and has a drainage area of 1.2 square
miles. The reach has a valley slope of 0.6% and channel slope of 0.4% giving it a sinuosity of 1.7. The
stream maintains an entrenchment ratio of 15-25. The watershed of the reference reach lies almost
entirely within the National Forest boundaries made up of predominantly silviculture southern yellow pine
with some bottomland forest, mixed upland hardwoods, and mixed shrubland.
Tributary to Town Creek
The unnamed tributary (LIT) to Town Creek is located north of SR 1413 (Town Creek Rd NE) near
Belville, NC in Brunswick County. The stream was classified as a blackwater E stream type with a
drainage area of 0.6 square miles. This reach flows through a semi mature bottomland forest and has an
average valley slope of 0.72% and an average channel slope of 0.35%. The channel has a width -to -depth
ratio of 8.9, an entrenchment ratio of over 20, and a sinuosity of 2.0. The watershed for this reference
reach is mostly used for cultivated silviculture with some forested land and shrubland.
Tributary to Hunters Creek
The LIT to Hunters Creek is in Jones County, south of Great Lake Road, Croatan National Forest. The
drainage area is 0.7 square miles and the land use within the drainage area is comprised of cultivated
silviculture, semi mature -mature bottomland forest/hardwood swamps, shrublands, and mixed upland
hardwoods. The LIT to Hunters Creek reference site was classified as a C6 stream type with a sinuosity of
1.5. The channel has a width to depth ratio of 19 and an entrenchment ratio of 16. The reach has a valley
slope of 0.4% while the channel slope is 0.2%.
HYBRID ECOREGION-SPECIFIC REGIONAL CURVE
The published Rural NC Coastal Plain regional curve (Doll, et al., 2003) along with an additional NC
Coastal Plain regional curve (Sweet and Geratz, 2003) was used to check hydraulic geometry based on
drainage area using regional relationships. A hybrid level IV ecoregion-specific curve was developed for
the Carolina Flatwoods ecoregion using data from the two published regional curves and supplementary
data from Kimley-Horn's internal reference reach database. Analytical review of applicable streams from
multiple stream reference databases and developing a hybrid regional curve, provided the most pertinent
background information to determine the appropriate design parameters given the existing conditions and
overall site functional uplift potential. Additionally, reference parameters from Kimley-Horn's internal
database based on successful past projects were consulted and analyzed. Appendix D illustrates the NC
Coastal Plain curves along with other data used for these analyses.
HEADWATER REFERENCE
In addition to design criteria reference data (mentioned above), design and placement of the headwater
restoration reach systems required consideration of the valley slope, contributing drainage area, ground
water inputs, curvature, soils, precipitation and ecoregion. Research provided in "Mapping Headwater
Streams: Intermittent and Perennial Headwater Stream Model Development and Spatial Application" by
Russell (2008) shows that contributing drainage area is the usually the dominating factor in predicting
intermittent and perennial stream points of origin. For the Coastal Plain it was found that the mean
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

contributing drainage area at the point of origin of intermittent streams is about 40 acres. For perennial
streams that value is about 100 acres.
Table 6 - Distribution of Intermittent and Perennial Origin Contributing Drainage Area (acre)
(Russell, 2008)
REFERENCE SITE WETLANDS
Wetland enhancement adjacent to UT3 and the confluence of UT2 and UT1 will be based on restoring
native wetland vegetation and improving hydraulic connectivity with the adjacent stream channel.
Additionally, raising the stream channel inverts will raise the adjacent groundwater elevation, thus improving
wetland hydrology. The three existing wetlands on-site are primarily impacted by silviculture and from
extensive ditching through the middle of the valley, which has drained the systems. The relic hydric soils
and valley features are already in place. The system uplift will be based on the headwater channel and
Priority 1 channel design which will raise the groundwater table. Any wetland enhancement or restoration
that results from the stream restoration work will be monitored and tracked. Reference wetland systems
(preservation area of system B of the Beaufort 56 site) in similar landscape positions (i.e., headwater or
riparian) and mapped soils will provide design and monitoring success criteria for hydrology and vegetative
community reference (see Figure 5 for hydric soils and Figure 10 for proposed monitoring locations).
DESIGN PARAME _R DEVELOPMEN
Design parameters were first based on the existing valley shape and slope, on-site relic stream systems,
the reference stream dimensionless parameters, and finally checked and confirmed using multiple
regional curves for North Carolina's Coastal Plain region. Appendix D outlines these developed
parameters.
5.2 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
STREAM MITIGATION WORK PLAN
The C26 Site is contained within a proposed 42.7 -acre conservation easement. The site contains
approximately 1,026 linear feet of headwater restoration (UT3), 4,659 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration
(UT1 - Reach 1 and UT1 - Reach 2), and 940 linear feet of Enhancement II.
A summary of the mitigation approach and lengths for each reach is provided in the table below.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1
Carolina Slate
Belt -A
Carolina SlateEastern
Belt-13Ridge
Blue
Foothills jib
Northern Outer
Piedmont
Rolling Coasta
Plain
Triassic Basin
Int
per
int
per
int
per
int
per
int
per
int
per
Min
0.20
0.72
0.05
2.04
0.23
0.24
1.55
2.54
0.16
7.16
0.10
0.13
10%
1.47
7.53
0.77
2.39
2.17
1.02
1.80
4.07
7.52
10.76
1.24
1.89
25%
2.85
11.58
4.89
9.52
3.72
2.91
4.48
10.05
11.15
28.82
1.95
3.27
50%
7.36
15.99
23.80
37.50
4.60
4.98
8.82
16.18
25.67
84.00
3.70
6.85
Mean
11.20
23.74
50.86
60.85
5.16
5.27
12.72
20.52
40.66
95.59
5.11
10.40
75%
14.47
35.40
69.96
68.16
6.34
7.04
15.06
27.11
55.15
122.00
7.16
15.79
90%
27.39
43.33
140.231
187.26
8.16
9.81
22.99
41.31
101.33
217.34
11.87
27.80
Max
74.63
107.00
322.27
328.28
14.60
15.85
115.95
64.81
173.65
343.66
16.51
30.239
(Russell, 2008)
REFERENCE SITE WETLANDS
Wetland enhancement adjacent to UT3 and the confluence of UT2 and UT1 will be based on restoring
native wetland vegetation and improving hydraulic connectivity with the adjacent stream channel.
Additionally, raising the stream channel inverts will raise the adjacent groundwater elevation, thus improving
wetland hydrology. The three existing wetlands on-site are primarily impacted by silviculture and from
extensive ditching through the middle of the valley, which has drained the systems. The relic hydric soils
and valley features are already in place. The system uplift will be based on the headwater channel and
Priority 1 channel design which will raise the groundwater table. Any wetland enhancement or restoration
that results from the stream restoration work will be monitored and tracked. Reference wetland systems
(preservation area of system B of the Beaufort 56 site) in similar landscape positions (i.e., headwater or
riparian) and mapped soils will provide design and monitoring success criteria for hydrology and vegetative
community reference (see Figure 5 for hydric soils and Figure 10 for proposed monitoring locations).
DESIGN PARAME _R DEVELOPMEN
Design parameters were first based on the existing valley shape and slope, on-site relic stream systems,
the reference stream dimensionless parameters, and finally checked and confirmed using multiple
regional curves for North Carolina's Coastal Plain region. Appendix D outlines these developed
parameters.
5.2 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
STREAM MITIGATION WORK PLAN
The C26 Site is contained within a proposed 42.7 -acre conservation easement. The site contains
approximately 1,026 linear feet of headwater restoration (UT3), 4,659 linear feet of Priority 1 restoration
(UT1 - Reach 1 and UT1 - Reach 2), and 940 linear feet of Enhancement II.
A summary of the mitigation approach and lengths for each reach is provided in the table below.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Table 7 — Stream Mitiaation Aaaroach S
UT1- R1 I Restoration 1 1,149 1 1,464
UT1- R2 Restoration 2,727 3,195
Craven 26
UT2 Enhancement 11 814 940
UT3 Headwater 1,084 1,026
Overall Stream Channel Mitigation Approach Description
All three tributaries within the C26 Site historically have been extensively ditched, which has altered the
wetland and stream systems that used to be located within the headwater valley of UT3 and valley of
UT1. The overall approach to restoration of UT3 and UT1 is to reverse the damage created through
ditching. More detailed and reach -specific approaches are outlined below for restoration and
enhancement reaches, but the overall goal of the approaches is to reconnect the channel flow with its
adjacent riparian floodplain and wetlands and restore native vegetation communities to restore lost
functions of the system.
The design process began with a thorough analysis of existing and historic conditions and functions
within the catchment area for each reach and analysis of hydrologic, hydraulic, and geomorphic functional
impairments within each reach, wetland, and floodplain. From this data, reference systems (e.g., streams,
headwaters, wetlands, and riparian buffers) were selected that represented a stable, healthy system that
manages the same or similar baseline conditions. Through a comparison of existing conditions and relic
performance, as well as historic conditions, major areas of concern and potential uplift were identified.
The concerns include, but are not limited to, bank instability, disconnection from the natural floodplain due
to significant ditching, incision, over -widening of existing channels, and wetland and floodplain drainage.
Site analysis also identified a significant loss of in -stream and riparian wetland habitat (including sources
of shade, woody detritus, and large woody debris for future habitat development).
These issues will be addressed with a watershed -based approach on the headwater system. Starting at
the top of the watershed, we will fill in the ditches within the valley reaches that show potential for
headwater system restoration. For systems that are intermittent or perennial, and with drainage areas
over 100 acres, a Priority 1 approach will be used (UT1) to continue a reconnection of the stream
hydrology to the adjacent floodplain through the valley; thus, raising the water table. This is a valley
restoration approach that will benefit adjacent wetland areas and the channel instead of only providing
uplift to the channel itself. In addition to raising the invert of the channel to its historic elevation, the
channel will be returned to its original location in the valley, along the lower elevation portions of its valley
and appropriate pattern and bedform diversity (profile) will be restored.
Headwater Restoration Approach Description
The Craven 26 Mitigation Site includes 1,026 linear feet of headwater restoration. The on-site headwater
system has been ditched to accelerate drainage, damaging the hydrological and ecological functions of
these systems. When functioning properly, with gradual progression from linear wetland systems to
channelized stream -wetland system, headwaters offer a vital ecological resource and mitigate against
nonpoint source pollution from the contributing watershed, as well as critical habitat for aquatic and
terrestrial species. Species diversity and frequency benefit from enhanced habitat in the headwater and
buffer areas along the entire C26 Site. As such, special focus has been given to addressing major
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

deficiencies in on-site headwater resources and the transitions from upland to headwater and headwater
to stream -wetland -floodplain.
Mitigation activities for UT3 will consist of a headwater restoration approach and will aim to remove
ditching and enhance riparian/wetland vegetation for a buffering mechanism. These improvements will
also aim to provide stabilized flow pathways for overland flow that will reduce sediment contributions from
off-site runoff and dissipate energy from potential sources of concentrated flow. Where relevant, new
planted vegetation will be selected based on its uplift potential for stability and erosion reduction, as well
as its functional value as wetland wildlife habitat. Headwater restoration is proposed to begin on each
reach where the cumulative drainage area becomes 40 acres. Research has documented that 40 acres is
the average watershed size in the coastal plain region that can support the formation of an intermittent
channel. (Russell, 2008) The headwater restoration will continue until the watershed size reaches 100
acres, at which point the work will transition to traditional priority I stream restoration.
In general, the headwater restoration approach applied to the reaches listed above will include the
following:
• Fill the existing ditch (use adjacent spoil piles from original ditching activity).
• Fill lateral ditches that tie-in to the existing centerline ditch (using adjacent spoil pile material).
• Ensure appropriate organic topsoil exists (site investigations confirmed plenty of organic topsoil
material on-site).
• Rip and disk the freshly placed soil and areas of construction to ensure soil is not compacted.
• Reestablish natural overland flow patterns within the adjacent buffers by removing berms and
planted rows and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within the buffer.
• Restore natural topography in the wetland -floodplain, including minor depression and small
mounds that promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats.
• Restore or enhance site hydrology by promoting surface water storage, increasing surface
ponding and infiltration, decreasing drainage capacity, and imposing a higher water table across
the valley.
• Plant appropriate headwater system woody and herbaceous vegetation.
• Install woody debris structures to provide immediate stabilization to the freshly filled portions of
the ditch footprint (e.g., log sills or brush mattresses).
• Install coir fiber matting (as necessary) in some locations where concentrated flow is anticipated.
• Plant native vegetation within all restored areas as the contractor works their way out of the
headwater restoration area and down to the lower stream restoration reaches
Stream Restoration Approach Description
Priority 1 restoration is proposed for UT1 - Reaches 1 and 2. Restoration activities aim to reconnect flow
to the floodplain during bankfull events and provide stable, natural bankfull dimensions, pattern, and
profile. These goals are accomplished by filling the existing ditched, incised, and eroding channel and
redirecting flow into a newly constructed natural channel that has been sized and aligned based on the
following:
• Relic stream location
• Valley topography/centerline location
• Consideration of dimensionless ratios from reference reach conditions
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

• Regional curve data
The following specific improvements are incorporated into the restoration reaches on the Site:
• Dimension—The channel will be reconnected to its historic valley and floodplain by raising the
stream back up from its incised/ditched condition and the channel will have an appropriate
bankfull depth. This will restore the groundwater depths in areas directly adjacent to the channel
and will allow for more frequent floodplain access for storm flows.
• Pattern—The channel will be returned to its historic location within its valley as opposed to its
current straight/ditched location. Within the confines and boundary of its historic valley center, the
channel's pattern will be returned based on on-site relic channel patterns, reference reach
dimensionless ratios, and regional curve data.
• Profile—With a restored dimension and pattern, the profile also will be designed to incorporate
bedform diversity with well-defined pools and shallow riffle reaches. In -stream structures will be
installed to provide scour for pools and initial grade control until the new riparian vegetation has
time to establish the root system necessary to hold the restored system in place. In addition,
woody structures—such as the proposed brush and roll riffles and toe-wood—will provide
immediate habitat and stabilization for the newly constructed channel.
• Riparian Buffer—Beyond restoring the natural channel, the stream restoration approach also
reestablishes a native riparian buffer protected with a permanent conservation easement that
provides uplift to site hydrology, channel stability, and availability of natural habitat.
• Flow Patterns—Within the adjacent buffers, natural overland flow patterns will be reestablished
by removing berms, planted rows, etc. and disrupting the drainage effect of ditches within the
buffer.
• Natural Topography—Natural topography in the floodplains, including minor depression and
mounds that promote diversity of hydrologic conditions and habitats, will be restored.
• Site Hydrology—Site hydrology will be restored or enhanced by promoting surface water storage,
increasing surface ponding and infiltration, decreasing drainage capacity, and imposing a higher
water table across the floodplain and wetlands.
Stream Enhancement Approach Description
LIT2 is the only enhancement reach proposed as part of the Site. It represents 940 linear feet of Level 2
Stream Enhancement. The enhancement approach aims to provide uplift to existing conditions by
modifying existing banks, removing adjacent spoil piles/berms, improve buffer conditions, and alter
adjacent overland flow/drainage. Enhancement Level 2 stream system improvements include the
following:
• Removing berms and spoil piles adjacent to the existing channel to improve overbank flooding
frequency.
• Stabilizing banks where BEHI or NBS is high or very high by grading, and installation of coir fiber
matting, and bio -engineering (i.e., live stakes and seeding).
• Establishing a 150 -foot -wide riparian buffer along the left side of the channel and converting
existing vegetation from young pine to a hardwood buffer.
• Locations of concentrated flow from surrounding land uses will be addressed through the
installation of vernal pools or pocket wetlands to slow the water down as it enters the riparian
buffer.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

• Re-establish natural overland flow patterns within the adjacent buffers by removing berms,
planted rows, etc. and by disrupting drainage effect of ditches and berms from the buffer
pp
Mitigation Approach for Individual Reaches
9
Mitigation approaches for each reach on the C26 Site have been outlined below. Table 7 provides an
overview of the suggested mitigation activities that will be employed to achieve the targeted objectives
within each reach.
Craven 26
UTI - Reach 1 and 2
Priority 1 Restoration - Mitigation activities include raising and re -meandering the channel with
appropriate dimensions to reconnect hydrology with the floodplain and restore/enhance riparian wetlands
adjacent to the stream. Within the channel, in -stream structures will be installed, including log vanes, log
cross vanes, toe wood, and brush and roll riffles to protect restored banks, maintain channel grade in
riffles, and enhance natural habitat within the restored profile. A 150 ft buffer will be added on both sides
of the stream valley.
UT2
Level 2 Enhancement - Mitigation activities include enhancing the channel by removing spoil piles along
the left and right banks, stabilizing limited eroding banks within the reach, and establishing a 150 -foot
buffer to each side of the stream to reduce surface erosion and dissipate overland concentrated flow.
Additionally, pocket wetlands will be established along the buffer in areas where concentrated flow from
offsite enters the conservation easement.
UT3
Headwater Restoration - Mitigation activities will aim to restore headwater stream -wetland -floodplain
system functionality by filling in the existing ditched channel and restoring appropriate grade, hydrology,
and vegetative communities. Any existing buffer hardwoods will be preserved and will continue to provide
a stabilized flow path for restored stream and riparian wetlands, and a 100 ft buffer will be added to each
side of the valley centerline to protect the restored system and regulate incoming surface flow from
outside the conservation easement.
WETLAND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
Through restoration of the headwater stream systems and Priority 1 restoration of the downstream
systems, riparian and headwater wetlands will be enhanced on-site. No wetland restoration credits are
being proposed along the Priority 1 reaches, rather the extra wide buffers (150 feet to each side of
channel) will be used for an increase in stream credits. There are approximately 0.24 acres of wetlands
that are anticipated to be enhanced on-site. These areas will be monitored after enhancement to
determine the extent of enhancement achieved. It is anticipated based on the site delineation,
topography/LIDAR and presence of hydric soils, that 0.24 acres of wetlands will be enhanced (through
restoring vegetation).
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Table 8 — Wetlo)
Wetland Enhancement Approach Description
Wetland enhancement activities aim to uplift site hydrology, surface and subsurface hydrologic
connectivity, vegetation diversity/density/composition/vigor, and to provide improvements that benefit
downstream waters. On site wetlands will be enhanced as part of the headwater stream restoration
activities and by converting vegetation from pine plantation to bottomland hardwood forest species. These
new plantings will provide flow velocity control, soil stability, habitat, and additional essential ecosystem
functions that will provide essential, permanent habitat for local fauna in areas where loblolly pine
timbering makes habitat less diverse.
VEGETATION AND PLANTING PLAN
Planting within the conservation easement has been separated into three zones to reflect differences in
purpose and location, as well as differences in vegetation. Zone 1 is located along the stream bank and
serves to provide bank stability and in -stream habitat along the channel. Zone 2 makes up the upland
riparian buffer of each reach, providing a wide range of benefits including physicochemical and
hydrological uplift to the channel as well as overbank habitat and erosion prevention. Zone 3 includes
wetland plantings within the riparian buffer. Buffer widths for either side of each reach are provided in
Table 9. The plant species proposed for Zones 1 and 3 were selected based on reference vegetative
conditions and various resources providing guidance on healthy North Carolina Coastal Plain bottomland
hardwood communities. Planting ratios were identified based on relevant guidance to restore natural
bottomland hardwood conditions that were impacted historically by land use and site manipulations. Tree
seedlings will be planted at a density of 500 stems per acre. There is a total of 41 acres to be planted at
this Site, which will require 20,500 seedlings.
Due to the differences in hydrologic purpose and ecological benefit, different planting profiles are
proposed for Headwater and stream mitigation areas. Typical planting sections are provided in the project
plan set, Appendix F, sheet 20.
Table 9 — Proposed Buffer Widths
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018
Left Buffer
Right Buffer
NNNEEEProposed
Length
width (ft)
width (ft)
UT1- R1
1,464
150
150
UTI - R2
3,195
150
150
Craven 26
UT2
940
150
150
UT3
1,026
100
100
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

Zone 1 — Stream Bank
Channel stability and geomorphology are dependent in large part on the health and strength of stream bank
vegetation. As such, live stakes selected for zone 1 have been identified for their rapid growth rate and high
success rates in channel bank conditions. Long term, stream bank vegetative conditions will evolve through
natural secondary succession, eventually transitioning to shade tolerant hardwoods like the riparian buffer
conditions. The table below provides Zone 1 species for live stake planting within these buffer areas.
Table 70 —Zone 7 planting summary
Stream Bank Live Stake Planting
(Quercus pagoda)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Wetland Indicator
Status
Silky Dogwood
(Cornus amomum)
FACW
Black Willow
(Salix nigra)
OBL
Cottonwood
(Populus deltoides)
FACW
Buttonbush
(Cepholonthus occidentalis)
OBL
Zones 2 and 3 — Riparian Upland and Riparian Wetland
Riparian wetland conditions suffer in absence of a stable vegetative stream buffer. Table 9 outlines
proposed buffer widths along either side of each reach. Tables 11 and 12 provide Zone 2 and 3 species
for planting within these buffer areas. Based on wetland conditions, different vegetation has been
identified. The wetland delineation for each site is shown in Figure 7.
Table 77 —Zone 2 Ri urian Upland Planting Summar
Upland Zone Planting
Wetland Indicator
Common Name Scientific Name Status Percent Planted
i
Cherrybark Oak
(Quercus pagoda)
FACW
20%
(Platanus
Indicator
Percent
American Sycamore
NameStatus
FACW
20%
occidentalis)
PlantedBald
Cxodium
(Fraxinus
OBL
18%
Green Ash
(Nyssa biflora)
FACW
20%
Water Tupelo
pennsylvanica)
OBL
16%
Willow Oak
I (Quercus phellos)
FACW
20%
Blackgum
I (Nyssasylvatica)
FAC
20%
Table 72 —Zone 3 Riaarian Wetland Plantina Summory
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1
Wetland Zone Planting
Wetland
Indicator
Percent
Commo7NameScientific
NameStatus
PlantedBald
Cxodium
distichum)
OBL
18%
Swamp Tupelo
(Nyssa biflora)
OBL
16%
Water Tupelo
(Nyssa aquatic)
OBL
16%
Cherrybark Oak
(Quercus pagoda)
FACW
18%
American Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis)
FACW
16%
Green Ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
FACW
16%
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

6.1 STREAM MITIGATION CREDIT CALCULATIONS
Proposed stream mitigation ratios and credits are included in the table below. These credits are based on
the lengths and approaches as included in the draft Mitigation Plan Sheets as of September 6th, 2018.
These numbers are subject to change based on the final design plan drawings that will be produced for
construction and based on the actual constructed project and as -built survey.
Table 13 — Proposed Stream Mitigation Credits
Total stream lengths and sub -total SMU's 5,663 6,514 6,061
BUFFER ADJUSTMENT TO STREAM CREDITS
(SEE "WILMINGTON DISTRICT STREAM BUFFER CREDIT CALCULATOR" WORKSHEETS IN APPENDIX E) 800
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS (SMU's) 6,861
6.2 WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT CALCULATIONS
Proposed wetland mitigation ratios and credits are included in the table below. These credits are based
on the delineated areas and restoration approaches as included in the draft Mitigation Plan Sheets as of
September 6th, 2018 (included as Appendix F). These values are subject to change based on the final
design plan drawings that will be produced for construction and based on the actual constructed project
and as -built survey.
Table 14 — Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits
Adjacent to Reach Mitigation Approach Mitigation Area Wetland MitigationWMU's
WI(ac.) Ratio
W3 UT3 Enhancement 0.24 3:1 0.08
TOTAL WETLAND CREDITS (WMU's) 0.08
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018
'
Proposed
'
Mitigation
Begin
End
Existing Length
Credit
77W
Length
SMUs
Approach
Station
Station
(ft.)
Ratio
(ft.)
UT1 - R1
Restoration
1+07
15+71
1,149
1,464
1:1
1,464
UT1 - R2
Restoration
15+71
47+66
2,727
3,195
1:1
3,195
Craven
26 UT2
Enhancement II
100+00
109+40
814
940
2.5:1
376
Headwater
UT3
200+00
210+26
1,084
1,026
1:1
1,026
Restoration
Total stream lengths and sub -total SMU's 5,663 6,514 6,061
BUFFER ADJUSTMENT TO STREAM CREDITS
(SEE "WILMINGTON DISTRICT STREAM BUFFER CREDIT CALCULATOR" WORKSHEETS IN APPENDIX E) 800
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS (SMU's) 6,861
6.2 WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT CALCULATIONS
Proposed wetland mitigation ratios and credits are included in the table below. These credits are based
on the delineated areas and restoration approaches as included in the draft Mitigation Plan Sheets as of
September 6th, 2018 (included as Appendix F). These values are subject to change based on the final
design plan drawings that will be produced for construction and based on the actual constructed project
and as -built survey.
Table 14 — Proposed Wetland Mitigation Credits
Adjacent to Reach Mitigation Approach Mitigation Area Wetland MitigationWMU's
WI(ac.) Ratio
W3 UT3 Enhancement 0.24 3:1 0.08
TOTAL WETLAND CREDITS (WMU's) 0.08
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

The credit release schedules shown in the tables below for stream and wetland milestones have been
produced in accordance with guidance provided by the Wilmington USACE:
Table 15 — Credit Release Schedule — Streams
Table 16 — Credit Release Schedule — Wetlands
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams
Credit Release
Credit Release
Total
Interim
Total
Release Activity
Release
Released
Milestone
Site Establishment
Release
Released
1
Site Establishment
15%
15%
2
Completion of oil initial physical and biological improvements made
0
15%
0
30%
2
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
0
15%
0
30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
3
interim performance standards have been met
10%
40%
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
standards have been met
4
interim performance standards have been met
10%
50%
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
10%
S
0
10%
0
60%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
S
6
interim performance standards have been met
5%
65%
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
7
interim performance standards have been met
10%
75
6
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
5%
70%
8
standards have been met
0
5%
0
80%
interim performance standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
7
[�"
performance standards have been met
in
90%
NOTE: 10% reserve credits will be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Table 16 — Credit Release Schedule — Wetlands
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Forested Wetland
Credit Release
Interim
Total
Release Activity
Milestone
Release
Released
1
Site Establishment
15%
15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made
2
0
15%
0
30%
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
3
10%
40%
standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
4
10%
50%
standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
S
0
15%
0
65%
standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
6
5%
70%
standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
7
15%
85%
standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that interim performance
8
0
5%
0
90%
standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that performance standards
9
0
10%
0
100%
have been met
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

The Site will be monitored based on the performance standards and monitoring requirements provided
below. Annual monitoring reports will be provided using the IRT monitoring template for the duration of
the 7 -year monitoring window. The proposed monitoring plan layout is outlined in Figure 10.
8.1 STREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Vegetative Monitoring
Vegetative monitoring will be conducted per the October 24, 2016 "Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" ("NCIRT guidance") with the exception that the site is a
relatively large uniform site with uniform planting conditions throughout the site and therefore 5% of the
total planted portion of the site will be monitored with vegetation plots. The NCIRT guidance states that
this area requirement can be adjusted on a case by case basis for these types of sites. A combination of
fixed (50%) and random (50%) 0.05 Ac plots will cover 5% of the planted area on site. Planted area
acreage was determined based on anticipated supplemental planting to expand existing hardwood areas
and replace absent buffers. Planted acreages and monitoring plot counts are provided in the table below.
Locations are shown in Figure 10.
Table 77— Vegetative Monitoring Plots
Sit Number of Tree Seedlings Vegetative Mo
ni
to be Planted JIM Permanent Random
Craven 26 41 Ac 20,500 22 21
Headwater Stream Monitoring
Headwater monitoring will be conducted every year for 7 years. Surface flow will be documented using
gauges or photo(s) (i.e. time lapse/game cameras) and will be monitored in accordance with the 2016
guidance.
Stream Channel Stability and Stream Hydrology Monitoring
Channel stability and hydrology monitoring will be conducted, per the 2016 guidance. The Bank Sponsor
will place two cross sections (1 riffle and 1 pool) per 1,000 feet of stream. Crest gauges will be installed to
monitor channel hydrology and will be capable of monitoring frequency and duration of overbank events.
Visual Monitoring
Monitoring will be conducted with a walkthrough of the entire project area, looking to identify areas of low
stem density, poor plant vigor, prolonged inundation, native and exotic invasive species, beaver activity,
herbivory, encroachments, indicators of livestock access, or other areas of concern. Results of both
monitoring walkthroughs each year will be reported in the annual monitoring report, where -in
recommended courses of action shall be identified where necessary. Any areas of concern will be
reevaluated on all subsequent visual assessments. Monitoring in preservation areas will be conducted
only for ensuring no activities are occurring that are in violation of the restrictions included in the
preservation mechanism.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

8.2 WETLAND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
MONITORING HYDROLOGY AND REPORTING HYDROLOGIC DATA
The wetland enhancement proposed as part of the mitigation activities within the C26 Site will be based
on improvements in vegetation within existing wetland areas within the proposed conservation easement.
Therefore, while some hydrologic improvements may result from the headwater and stream restoration
activities on-site, no credit is being claimed for this hydrologic improvement and therefore no groundwater
monitoring gages will be required as part of monitoring.
8.3 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
VEGETATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Success will be identified based on interim stem density criteria provided in the 2016 NCIRT guidance:
• Survival of at least 320 stems per acre at the end of year 3, 260 stems per acre by the end of
year 5, and 210 stems per acre at the end of year 7.
• Per IRT guidance, coastal plain projects must maintain vegetation that averages 7 feet in height
at year 5 and 10 feet in height at year seven.
• No one species may comprise more than 50% of the total composition within any plot at year 3, 5,
or 7.
STREAM CHANNEL STABILITY AND STREAM HYDROLOGY PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
Stream Channel Flow
All channels shall receive sufficient flow throughout the monitoring period to maintain an ordinary high-
water mark. Continuous surface flow within tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at
least 30 consecutive days during the prescribed monitoring period, per the 2016 NCIRT guidance.
Channel Stability
Bank Height Ratios and Entrenchment Ratios shall meet minimum/maximum requirements as provided in
the 2016 NCIRT guidance, and not differ by more than 10% from baseline conditions. Bank Height Ratios
shall not exceed 1.2. Entrenchment Ratios shall not be less than 2.2.
Bankfull Events
The project shall remain stable during 4 separate bankfull events occurring in separate years during
monitoring years 1 through 7.
Headwater Stream Flow Performance Standards
Success will be based on the standards outlined in the 2016 NCIRT guidance for Headwater Stream
Performance Standards with the exception that continuous surface water flow must be documented to
occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days for monitoring years 4 through 7. The extensive ditch
drainage system that will be filled during restoration activities will require a large amount of material to be
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

moved and placed in the existing ditches. To reduce disturbance within the headwater system existing
spoil material from on-site will be used to fill the ditches and some small portions of the ditches will be
graded to act as vernal pools. It will take a few seasons for an appropriate number of fines to wash into
the system naturally to fill the voids of the newly placed material therefore sealing it up. During years 1
through 3 these fines will work their way into the system and return baseflow to the flow path of the
headwater valley system. Visual identification of natural channel formation indicators will be performed in
accordance with the schedule provided in the 2016 NCIRT monitoring guidance will.
8.4 EARLY CLOSURE PROVISION
If at year 5 the Site has demonstrated through monitoring that mitigation activities have been successful
without concerns identified, the Sponsor may propose to terminate monitoring of the site and forego
monitoring requirements of year 6 and 7.
8.5 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In the event the mitigation site or a specific component of the mitigation site fails to achieve the necessary
performance standards as specified in the mitigation plan, the sponsor shall notify the members of the
IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
8.6 POST -CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
An as -built survey will be conducted following construction to document channel condition and provide
baseline data for comparison to future monitoring reports. Information included in the as -built will be in
accordance with USACE guidance and has been identified in the monitoring requirements and
performance standards sections.
Monitoring reports will be provided to the Wilmington District USACE for review no later than April 1st of
the year following the monitoring activity.
8.7 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Land use and property boundaries along with this proposed Mitigation Plan were designed to minimize
long-term management conflicts. As a result, the potential for hydrologic and boundary conflicts have
been minimized. The Sponsor has identified Unique Places to Save (a 501 (c)(3) entity) as the grantee of
the conservation easement deed. The Bank Sponsor will serve as long-term steward of the site. The
recorded conservation easement deed will ensure the protection of the project in perpetuity. The site -
protection instrument is provided in Appendix I.
8.8 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
In accordance to Section IX (Financial Assurances) found in the Middle Neuse UMBI, the Bank Sponsor
shall provide financial assurances in the form of a Performance Bond to the IRT sufficient to assure
completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial work required.
Financial assurances shall be payable at the direction of the USACE to its designee or to a standby trust.
Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the USACE in the event of default by the Bank
Sponsor are not acceptable. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the USACE
receives notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018

The amount of the Performance Bond shall be based on costs to implement the Site through monitoring.
The Performance Bond shall be in place prior to the first credit release. Since the Bank Sponsor is
developing six other mitigation sites simultaneously with this Site, the Bank Sponsor is proposing the use
of one Performance Bond to cover all seven mitigation sites. Thus, the costs that are detailed in the table
below include the construction and monitoring costs for all seven mitigation sites.
Table 18 — Estimated Amount Required for Performance Bond
Active Cost
Site Prep Mechanical Rip
$5,854.73
Site Prep Disking (to remove any remaining planting beds)
$8,131.57
Site Prep Chemical Application (If needed)
$5,529.47
Site Prep Prescribed Burn (if needed)
$2,276.84
Planting Labor and Seedlings (bottomland hardwood restoration and
enhancement areas)
$76,255.00
$2,948,651.06
Stream Construction Work (in -stream and riparian buffer work)
As -built Report
$133,440.00
Annual Monitoring
$1,232,323.43
Total Estimated Amount of Performance Bond $4,412,462.10
The USACE will review the as -built and annual monitoring reports to evaluate the success of the
hydrological and ecological restoration. Success will be evaluated based on the Site's adherence to
performance standards specified in Section 8.3. As performance standards are met, the Bank Sponsor
will request a reduction in the amount of the performance bond based on the reduction schedule provided
in below. The reduction schedule assumes that all seven sites will meet all performance standards on an
annual basis.
Table 19 — Performance Bond Reduction Schedule.
A
Reduction Amount (%) Reduction Amount ($) Bond Amount
Establishment of Performance Bond
N/A N/A $4,412,462.10
65% $2,868,100.37 $1,544,361.74
USACE approval of As -Built Report
USACE approval of Year 1 Monitoring
USACE approval of Year 2 Monitoring
USACE approval of Year 3 Monitoring
5%
$220,623.11
$1,323,738.63
5%
$220,623.11
$1,103,115.53
5%
$220,623.11
$882,490.232
USACE approval of Year 4 Monitoring
5%
$220,623.11
$661,869.32
USACE approval of Year 5 Monitoring
5%
$220,623.11
$441,246.21
USACE approval of Year 6 Monitoring 5% $220,623.11
USACE approval of Year 7 Monitoring 5% $220,623.11
Total 100% $4,412,462.10
$220,623.11
$0.00
A copy of the proposed Performance Bond is attached as Appendix J.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Sweet, W. V. & Geratz, J. W. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and Recurrence Intervals for
North Carolinas Coastal Plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39, 861-
871 (2003).
Doll, Barbara A., A.D. Dobbins, J. Spooner, D.R. Clinton and D.A. Bidelspach, Hydraulic Geometry
Relationships for Rural North Carolina Coastal Plain Streams, NC Stream Restoration Institute,
Report to N.C. Division of Water Quality for 319 Grant Project No. EW20011, www.ncsu.edu/sri.
11 pp. (2003).
Russell, Periann 2008. Mapping Headwater Streams: Intermittent and Perennial Headwater Stream
Model Development and Spatial Application. Final Report for Federal Highway Administration
Contract Feasibility Study WBS: 36486.4.2. January 28, 2008.
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District (2003), Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.A. O'Hara, A. Jessup, R. Everhart. 1999.
Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. N.C. State University,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Harmon, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. (2012) A Function -Based
Framework for Stream Assessments and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016a. River Basin Classification Schedule
(online). Available: https://deq.nc.gov/river-basin-classification-schedule [August 01, 2018]. North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh.
North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment Method
(NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland Assessment
Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs, Colorado
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Floodplain Mapping Information System.
http://floodmaps.nc.gov/FMIS/Default.aspx Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2018. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
ilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSu
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
I September 2018

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1960. Soil Survey of Craven County, North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service.
The Stream Stats web program for North Carolina. Available online at:
https://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/north-carolina.html
National Land Cover Database 2011. [Online WWW]. Available URL: https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd20l 1.php
United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Cover Dataset 1992. [Online WWW]. Available
URL: https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcdl992.php
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 6-8-2015. Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Craven County, NC. Available online at:
http://www.fws.gov/raIeigh/species/cntylist/Craven.htmI
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J.R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships for North Carolina streams. Wildland
Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy, eds. American Water
Resources Association. June 30-July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database for North Carolina. United States Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online at
https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. (FY2016 release date).
North Carolina Department of Transportation. 2003. Reference Reach Database. In publication.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. NC
Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. NC
Department of Environmental Quality. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Craven County, NC.
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan - DRAFT
September 2018 1

Appendix A
Figures
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

Greenville
Ignston
,New Bern .... ..
O
us 0
7u_
_10
C,.,*. 9.6
is
Em—ld
Gorr
Ju b
Trent Woods
`t7, pent
H
Al
o River Bend
ID
R—, Bend
Goff& Country
Club
A
Legend
Feld V=I.
Conservation Easement 0 1.5 3 Miles
County Boundary
Prepared For Prepared By: Craven 26
Figure 1
AWeyerhaeuser Kimley)))Horn Vicinity Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Legend
Conservation Easement
Weyerhaeuser Properties
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Prepared For: Prepared By: Craven 26
Figure 2
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>))Horn USGS Topographic Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Fh
1958 Aerial
1993 Aerial
Legend
Conservation Easement
Feet
0 1,500 3,000
Prepared For: Prepared By: Craven 26
Figure 3
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>)Morn Historic Aerials
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

AGRICULTURE
ON SERVICE
Ow
2 5 -Q
Ka
Ra
M
Le
Le CrB lro�'
C rA
La
C r B
6A
Le
vr
a.J. MM
R
L L
C rig Ly r
Le
La
Le.
ti
Legend 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Conservation Easement
f r4. R a
Prepared For Prepared By: Craven 26
Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>Morn Figure 4
NRCS Soil Survey - Craven County
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

Map unit
Map unit name
Hydric
s mbol
Patin
CrB
Craven silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes
6
GoA
Goldsboro loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent
6
slopes
La
Leaf silt loam
90
Le
Lenoir silt loam
8
Ly
Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent
10
,slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
MM
Masontown mucky fine sandy loamand
70
Muckalee sand loam fre uentl flooded
Re
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
92
Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
Legend
Q Conservation Easement
Prepared For: Prepared By:
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>>> Horn
CrB
La
Le
CrB
L
CrB
La
rkNe �airnin
omee3a'�6fiAM
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Craven 26
Figure 5
Hydric Soils Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

/ \ I
\ j UT2
Drainage Area: 408 Acres
\� UT1 - Reach 1 1
�.� Drainage Area: 1,187 Acres
� UT3
Drainage Area: 65 Acres j
UT1 - Reach 2
Drainage Area: 1,765,'
I /
I j
Legend
QConservation Easement
Stream Contributing Watershed 0 2,000 4,000 Feet
^� USGS NHD Flowline
Prepared For: Prepared By: Craven 26
1, Figure 6
Weyerhaeuser Kimley>))Horn Watershed Map
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank

w

UT2 (940 LF) Enhancement of existing system
by establishing a buffer and conservation
easement of 150' wide to each side of the channel.
Conservation Easement:
42.7 Acres
UT1 - Reach 1 (1,464 LF) Proposed
headwater restoration. Fill existing
ditched system and supplement exsbrig
vegetation with trees, shrubs and
herbaceous plantings. Establish a buffer
that is 100' to each side of the valley
centerline
UT3 (1,026 LF) Proposed headwater
restoration. Fill existing ditched system and
supplement existing vegetation with trees,
shrubs and herbaceous plantings. Establish
a buffer that is 100' to each side of the
valley centerline
I
UT1 - Reach 2 (3,195 LF) Proposed priority 1
restoration and establishment of buffer
150' to each side of the channel.
W3 (0.24 Ac) Riparian
N
Legend
QConservation Easement
Weyerhaeuser Properties a`^
Mitigation Approach '
---- Enhancement II _ F
Headwater Restoration
Op
Restoration (Priority 1)
0 Wetland Enhancement 0 500 1,000 Feet
Prepared For: Prepared By: Craven 26
/�
Figure 9
A Weyerhaeuser Kimley>Morn Proposed Mitigation Plan
Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
9/13/2018

Appendix B
Photo Pages
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

47
-47
i
y � ° te
r .�
„

471
X J
®ro
4.7
-X tdg-
74-

Appendix C
Geomorphic Cross -Sections
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

XS1 - UT1 Reach 1
c Ground Points • Bankfull Indicators • Water Surface
Points
Wbkf = 7.01 Dbkf = 1.88 Abkf = 13.2
0 5 10 15 20 25
Horizontal Distance (ft)

0
0
C: 9
O
4-0
C6
_N 9
W
XS2 - UT1 Reach 2
c Ground Points • Bankfull Indicators • Water Surface
Points
Wbkf = 7.43 Dbkf = .89 Abkf = 6.59
0 25 50 75 100
Horizontal Distance (ft)

Appendix D
Geomorphology
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

REFERENCE REACH MORPHOLOGICAL DATA
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Craven County, North Carolina
VARIABLES
(All units are in Feet)
Beaverdam
Branch
Min Max
Black Branch
Min Max
Tributary to
Town Creek
Min Max
Tributary to
Hunters
Min Max
Averaged Ratios
Min Av Max
1
Stream Type (Rosgen)
E5
E
E
C6
--
2
Drainage Area (square miles)
3.20
1.20
0.60
0.70
3
Bankfull Width (Wbkf)
11.6
19.8
8.1
14.9
7.0 13.2
17.0
--
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf)
1.2
1.7
1.0
1.5
0.9 1.3
0.9
5
Width/Depth Ratio (Wbddbkf)
9.7
11.6
8.1
9.9
7.8 10.2
18.9
8.5
10.9
10.6
6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (Abkf)
17.1
28.8
10.1
21.7
7.4 11.9
15.0
7
Bankfull Mean Velocity, ft/s (Vbkf)
0.6 1
1.0
0.8
1 1.3
2.8
--
8
Bankfull Discharge, cfs (Qbkf)
16.9
18.4
13.1
42.0
9
Bankfull Maximum Depth (dmax)
2.1
2.8
1.4
2.6
1.7 2.1
1.8
10
Max dmax/dbkf ratio
1.6
1.8
1.4
1.7
1.6 1.9
2.0
1.6
1.7
1.8
11
Low Bank Height to Max Bankfull dbkf ratio
1.2
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.5
12
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wfpa)
164.6
216.3
200.0
225.0
175.0 180.0
278.5
13
Entrenchment Ratio (Wfp)Wbkf)
10.4
34.5
13.4
27.8
13.3 25.7
16.4
12.41 20.2
1 29.3
14
Meander Length (Lm)
92.0
125.0
120.0
15
Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width (Lm/Wbkf)
4.9
6.7
7.1
4.9
6.2
6.7
16
Radius of Curvature (Ro)
30.0
40.0
31.0
17
Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull Width (Ro Wbkf)
1.6
2.1
1.8
1.6
1.8
2.1
18
Belt Width (Wbif)
49.0
105.0
40.0
19
Belt Width Ratio (Wbif/Wbkf)
2.6
5.6
2.4
2.6
3.5
5.6
20
Sinuosity (k) (Stream Length /Valley Length)
1.70
2.10
1.60
1.70
2.00
1.50
1.7
1.8
1.9
21
Valley Slope (Svaiiey) (ft/ft)
0.0007
0.0044
0.0017
0.0048
0.0072
0.0040
--
22
Average Stream Slope (Savg) _ (Svauey/k)
0.0004
0.0021
0.0011
0.0028
0.0036
0.0027
23
Riffle Slope (Sr;ff)
-
24
Ratio of Riffle Slope to Avg. Slope (Sr;ffi Savg)
25
Pool Slope (Spool)
--
26
Ratio of Pool Slope to Avg. Slope S /S
p 9 p pooh avg
27
Maximum Pool Depth (Dpooi)
2.9
4.1
1.3
3.1
2.2 3.0
3.0
--
28
Ratio of Pool Depth to Bkf Depth (Dpooi/dbkf)
0.9
1.5
1.0
2.2
2.0 2.7
3.4
1.3
2.0
2.1
29
Pool Width (Wpooi)
13.4
18.1
9.2
17.0
9.7 12.5
11.5
--
30
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width (Wpoo1/Wbkf)
0.8
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.1 1.4
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.3
31
Pool Area (Apooi)
20.3 1
34.8
8.8
1 30.5
10.4 1 15.8
--
32
Ratio of Pool Area to Bankfull Area (Apooi/Abkf)
0.8
1.3
0.8
1.5
1.1 1.7
0.9
1.2
1.5
33
Pool to Pool Spacing (p - p)
100.0
51.0
34
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Width (p-p/Wbkf)
5.4
3.0
4.2

N
v
Q
mo
1000
100
10
Craven 26 Site Design Bankfull Area Plot
0.1
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve - Doll
• Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Data
♦ Design Values
Drainage Area (square miles)
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve - Sweet/Geratz
Existing Conditions
10
—Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Regional Curve
X Reference Reaches
100
milli!!
-_■■■■■■ ��'OWLI R 0.88 '
�M■■■■■■ ■ii■■1
p, 0.94 ,
Plain
���_---------..bastal
, , e
���■■■■■ �■■■■■■ ■■■■s
0.1
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve - Doll
• Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Data
♦ Design Values
Drainage Area (square miles)
NC Coastal Plain Regional Curve - Sweet/Geratz
Existing Conditions
10
—Hybrid Carolina Flatwoods Regional Curve
X Reference Reaches
100

CRAVEN 26 SITE MORPHOLOGICAL DATA
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Craven Countv. North Carolina
VARIABLES
(All units are in Feet)
Existing
XS1
UT1 - Reach 1
Regional Curve &
Reference Reaches
Min Ava Max
Design
Min Max
Existing
XS2
UT1 - Reach 2
Regional Curve &
Reference Reaches
Min TAvg FMax.
Design
Min I Max
Stream Type (Rosgen)
G
E
E
G
E
E
2
Drainage Area (square miles)
1.85
1.85
1.85
2.75
2.75
2.75
3
Bankfull Width (Wbkf)
7.0
14.7
18.0
16.9
20.0
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf)
1.9
1.3
1.1
1.5
1.3
5
Width/Depth Ratio (Wbkddbkf)
3.7
8.5
10.9
10.6
16.3
8.5
T109T
10.6
15.9
6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (Abkf)
13.2
18.6
19.9
24.7
25.2
7
Bankfull Mean Velocity, fUs (Vbkf)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
8
Bankfull Discharge, cfs (Qbkf)
19.1
19.1
24.4
24.4
9
Bankfull Maximum Depth (dmax)
2.4
2.0
2.2
2.3
1.8
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.0
10
Max d_x/dbkf ratio
1.3
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.6
11
Low Bank Height to Max Bankfull dbkf ratio
1.9
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.0 1.0
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.0 1.0
12
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wfpa)
9.5
182.4
298.1
432.6
180.0 540.0
209.4
342.4
496.8
200.0 600.0
13
Entrenchment Ratio (Wfpa/Wbkf)
1.4
12.4
20.2
29.3
10.0 30.0
12.4
20.2
29.3
10.0 30.0
14
Meander Length (Ln,)
72.3
91.9
98.8
90.0 126.0
83.0
105.6
113.5
100.0 140.0
15
Ratio of Meander Length to Bankfull Width (LI/Wbkf)
4.9
6.2
6.7
5.0 7.0
4.9
6.2
6.7
5.0 7.0
16
Radius of Curvature (Ro)
23.6
27.0
31.0
28.8 45.0
27.1
31.1
35.6
32.0 50.0
17
Ratio of Radius of Curvature to Bankfull Width (RAW)
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.6 2.5
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.6 2.5
18
Belt Width (Wblt)
38.3
52.1
82.6
36.9 81.1
44.0
59.8
94.8
42.3 93.2
19
Belt Width Ratio (Wblt/Wbkf)
2.6
3.5
5.6
2.5 5.5
2.6
3.5
5.6
2.5 5.5
20
Sinuosity k Stream Len th / Valley Length)
1.05
1.65
1.77
1.90
1.26
1.05
1.65
1.77
1.90
1.26
21
Valley Slope (Sva,,,) (ft/ft)
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
22
Average Stream Slope (Savg) = (Svalle> k)
0.0022
0.0018
0.0022
0.0014
23
Riffle Slope (Sr;ff)
0.0028 0.0073
0.0021 0.0056
24
Ratio of Riffle Slope to Avg. Slope (Sr;fge/Savg)
1.5 4.0
1.5 4.0
25
Pool Slope (Sp_,)
0.0000 0.0002
0.0000 0.0001
26
Ratio of Pool Slope to Avg. Slope (Spool/Savg)
0.0 0.1
0.0 0.1
27
Maximum Pool Depth (Dpool)
1.7
2.5
2.7
2.2
1.9
2.9
3.1
2.5
28
Ratio of Pool Depth to Bkf Depth (Dpool/dbkf)
1.3
2.0
2.1
2.0
1.3
2.0
2.1
2.0
29
Pool Width (Wp_l)
14.3
16.0
19.7
19.8
16.4
18.4
22.6
22.0
30
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull Width (Wpool/Wbkf)
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.1
31
Pool Area (Apool)
--
16.7
22.3
27.9
23.9
22.2
29.6
37.0
30.2
32
Ratio of Pool Area to Bankfull Area (Apool/Abkf)
0.9
T12
1.5
1.2
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.2
33
Pool to Pool Spacing (p - p)
61.9
54.0 126.0
71.1
60.0 140.0
34
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing to Bankfull Width (p-p/Wbkf)
4.2
3.0 7.0
4.2
3.0 7.0

Appendix E
Buffer Credit Calculations
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

Site Name: Craven 26
USACE Action ID: SAW -2017-02019
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor: Weyerhauser NR Company
County: Craven
Minimum Required Buffer Width': 50
Mitigation Type
Restoration (1:1)
Enhancement 1(1.5:1)
Enhancement 11(2.5:1)
Preservation (5:1)
Other (7.5:1)
Other (10:1)
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals
Buffer Zones
Max Possible Buffer (square feet)°
Ideal Buffer (square feet)'
Actual Buffer (square feet)'
Zone Multiplier
Buffer Credit Equivalent
Percent of Ideal Buffer
Credit Adjustment
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
Baseline Stream Credit
4659.00
376.00
5599.00 5035.00
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Buffer Width Zone (feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
less than 15 feet
>15 to 20 feet
>20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
>30 to 35 feet
>35 to 40 feet
>40 to 45 feet
>45 to 50 feet
>50 to 75 feet
>75 to 100 feet
>100 to 125 feet
>125 to 150 feet
167970
55990
55990
55990
55990
55990
55990
55990
279950
279950
279950
279950
168748.60
56506.96
56592.50
56506.65
55699.08
54800.98
54137.80
53585.90
262772.90
257791.40
255899.20
256821.40
166839.40
55393.40
55241.60
54918.50
53873.70
52738.40
51837.60
51046.60
246489.00
235540.90
227114.20
211957.40
50%
10%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
5%
7%
5%
41Y
41Y
2517.50
503.50
503.50
503.50
251.75
251.75
251.75
251.75
352.45
251.75
201.40
201.40
99%
98%
98%
97%
97%
96%
96%
95%
941Y
91%
89%
83%
-28.48
-9.92
-12.02
-14.15
-8.25
-9.48
-10.70
-11.93
330.61
230.02
178.75
166.22
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in
Total Baseline Credit Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
5035.00 -104.93 905.59 800.67 5835.67
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank (50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
'Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios, which are equal to the number of feet in the feet -to -credit mitigation ratio (e.g., for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit, the multiplier would be 8).
'Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type. If stream reaches are not creditable, they should be excluded from this measurement, even if they fall within the easement.
chis amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width. This number is not used in calculations, but is provided as a reference.
'Maximum potential size (in square feet) of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches, calculated using GIS, including areas outside of the easement. The inner zone (0-15') should be measured from the top of the OHW M or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non -creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
6Square feet in each buffer zone, as measured by GIS, excluding non -forested areas, all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard, etc. Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width, so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non -creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.

Appendix F
Mitigation Plan Sheets
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

T
Y
9
O
0
a
a
O
0
0
�C)
�c
S L
Y �
O
> -c
J �
+� U
N O
N O
cn
S N
C
U
c)-
0 O
9 O
N U
� U
>
0
J �
/ a
� o
Q
<�
/a
Q�
o�
�Q
U
C O
/ 3
cnc
= U
U �
To
t) U
P
C)
T
Y U
1 a
J�
Q
U
N
O
Q�
� O
T
0
_U
(n
0
E -
N O
-c
C) Y C)
iJ °
J �
�c
oa)
Ta)
C�
J�
Q
9
>
�a
JQ
� U
0
S U
U 3
� N
N
U- O
N
Y �
T
U
� O
N �
o -c:
i ~
DRAFT MITIGATION PLANS
for
m
z
O
cn
W
n,
O
z
STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION BANKCN 0 LLJ
L
1-- 0 Y
W N
Ld
WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY >4r4
O 0 rn
O Ln
ch
— �CRAVEN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
oorl
O
O
Nw
z
RELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IY
ENGINEER:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202
[phone]
DAREN PAIT, P.E., CFM
OWNER:
WEYERHAEUSER NR COMPANY
406 COLE ROAD
HATTIESBURG, MS 39402
[phone]
DOUG HUGHES
SURVEY:
BASE MAPPING PROVIDED BY:
2014 QL2 LI DAR
METADATA CONTACT:
NC FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
4105 REEDY CREEK DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27607
[phone]
Ro<< V
REEK ER
RD
SITE BOUNDARY
VICINITY MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 2000 4000 8000
Sheet List Table
Sheet
Number
Sheet Title
01
COVER SHEET
02
GENERAL NOTES
03
LEGEND AND SYMBOLS
04
TYPICAL PLAN AND PROFILE
05
TYPICAL SECTIONS
06
OVERALL PLAN AND KEY SHEET
07
PLAN AND PROFILE UT1 — REACH 1
08
PLAN AND PROFILE UT1 — REACH 1&2
09-11
PLAN AND PROFILE UT1 — REACH 2
12
PLAN AND PROFILE UT2
13
PLAN AND PROFILE UT3
14-17
STREAM DETAILS
18-19
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
20
VEGETATION NOTES AND DETAILS
O
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
W
W
2
U)
W
O
U
1►
of
0
LL0
w
Q
a_
LW
N
a_
h'o'
G
SHEET NUMBER
01
00
o
o
O
—
w
�O0
O
wN
=
cn
CD
O
\
Q
U�
Q
m
m
O
0
m
Q
Q
\
LLJ
Z
Z
W
_ —
0)
J
U
�0
O
UW
U)
o
o
u
W
W
2
U)
W
O
U
1►
of
0
LL0
w
Q
a_
LW
N
a_
h'o'
G
SHEET NUMBER
01

U
C
m
N
O
U
U
o
w
vi
Q
Q
c
U
C
0
T
E
0
T
U)
Z
O
o
w
3
U
0
m
U
C
U
O
O
O
c
O
z
Q
C)
E
o
U
Y
O Z
w
N J
U
a
O
o
0
W N
o
U
C
o
LLJo
z
O
w
o
_
Q
O
Z
o
= r
U
I
JOl
Q
c:
7
o
r
a�
W
Z
W
`3
O
O
N W
Z
O
Ln
O
■ O
c
U)O
C
U
U
U)
CO
N
C
c
U
U
>
°
O
A
PRELIMINARYY
Q
Q)Q)
a
NOT FOR
Q
CONSTRUCTION
N
Q�
.E
THS PAGE NTENT OFEET BLANK.
Q
c
o
Q)
�Q
O
0
U
�
N
Q
L
N
U)
3
N
U
3
N
L
U
N
N
3
3
o°
0
U
�o
O
Y
D
o
w O
O
0 (
O
O
N
LLJ
��
=
un
U)
m
m
J
Ln
Q
Q I�
3 O
Q
0
z
m
Q
w
U
_0-)U
O
O
Q
(
z
Q
U
w
Y
U
W
U
N
O
C
L
CL
�
O
'
U) �/ ,
•
O
T
O
O
N
O
N
0
Zc
N
L
N
Q
U
>
L
O
N
U,
O
w
cn
C
O
E
L
W
0w
O
c
Z
c
JC
Q
U
V
W
Z
W
U
�
Q
(D
N
O
.Q)
Q)
Q)
�
O
U
UQ)
U
a
Q.)
��
N
�
�+ <
CN Lu mQ.) �
Z O
�a
w o 0 w
u
OU
C
U
> z�
Q Q Q w
N
Lu
Q-1
� � V
��
6
U Q
w
O
U
0
/)
c
M
SHEET NUMBER
Q
O
02
0

U
C
N
_O
U
O
Q
a
U
0
T
E
Y
O
T
0
3
V)
U
C
_U
U
0
Q
a
U
0
T
E
Y
T
O
3 a
a U
� a
r U
U
a
z t
< o
zo
o
c
% 0
� o
U
C U
U E-
a
/ U
9 O
a
C
N
N t
U
J U
/ U
U
J
N0
a
cn a
DE
Ca
c
U
ao
�v)
o
a�
U
C �
/ N
U U
cn a
� N
N Q
U
u)
L U
T 3
(D
t
9 .Q
n �
O
Y Q)
Z U
a
_ Q
J
/ U
u)
o
a
a
E U
U
N
Q-
v) N
� N
O
DO T
�D O
a
VN
a
N c
.0
N
U
>
i
N
N
J O
+•
� O
N
U
7 .c
Q U
U
Z Q
1J U
J N
i
a
� N
OO
T O
U N
J N
a
9 c
V o)
> a
U
a
J c
U
n Q
U U
N 0
o
C
U
t
i
N �
U- O
CL +
N
c
Y N
T E-
U
U O
N a
�N
o�
EXISTING PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
EXISTING MINOR COUNTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
— — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING GRAVEL/DIRT ROAD
m EXISTING CULVERT/PIPE
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED PLAN LEGEND
1035+00
PROPOSED STREAM CENTERLINE
B PROPOSED STREAM BANKFULL
IB PROPOSED STREAM INNER BERM (BACK)
CE PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPOSED LOG CROSS VANE
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE
PROPOSED BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFLE
vvvvvvvv
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
vvvvvvvv
vvvvvvvv
PROPOSED HEADWATER FILL
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
PROPOSED PROFILE LEGEND
EXISTING GRADE AT PROPOSED CENTERLINE
PROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM
PROPOSED BANKFULL
ml
W
Q
cn
z
O
cn
w
ofz
a
LU
OO z
chO O
CIAW
N J
cf) O �
N
�00Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
Z C)
J
00
Z 00
w�
w C)
J
0
Z
r ^
N w m o
Z
z O
w p �
Q < Q w
2i (D ll�
U Q
Nw �
LL
cn
SHEET NUMBER
03
Y
U
O
-
O
E
w
O
O
N
=
cn
0 (_0��
O
Q
(")
Q
m
>-
m
Ln
o O
om
o
Q �
Z
Z
w
_
J
U
Y O
UW
�
=
�
Q
Q
U
0
Z C)
J
00
Z 00
w�
w C)
J
0
Z
r ^
N w m o
Z
z O
w p �
Q < Q w
2i (D ll�
U Q
Nw �
LL
cn
SHEET NUMBER
03

(3
C
N
_O
U
O
V)
V)
Q
a
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
0
3
0
V)
U
C
N
_U
U
0
Q
U
0
T
E
Y
T
0
aQ
Z �
� a
c
J U
n o
J
Q a
J o
1 a
n c
Cf) '
LU
cf) o
c
a
/ c
9 Q)
V E
c
U U
U O
�a
.c
<0
J Q)
/ U
� C
Q
�o
Q
E
Q .-
c
U
0`6 U o
U N
cn
c �
/ U
� U
N
U -6
N N
U i
U
Q_
N N
T Q
N
U
U
;O 3
P -
U
/
Y
1 0
J �
S Q)
J �
c
U
Q)
E QQ
n a
— U
�Q_
V)
p
�0
T
-0
Q) -0
Ea
QC
nco
U
�L
�V)
Y
Z o
�0
Q�
�C
JC
J�
Q
1
�a
0
�V)
UN
J�
�c
>a
�a
J c
U
�co
n Q
�Q)
U U
N C
U
t
N �
U- O
CL +
N
c c
Y N
>, E
U
U O
N a
0L
NOTES:
TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE PROVIDED TO GIVE THE GENERAL DIMENSIONS
OF THE CHANNEL.
FINAL GRADING WILL GIVE THE CHANNEL A MORE "NATURAL"
APPEARANCE AND ALLOW A SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM EXISTING
CHANNEL TO NEW CHANNEL AND BETWEEN RIFFLE AND POOL
SECTIONS.
RIFFLE FLOODPLAIN WIDTH VARIES BASED ON THE TYPICAL
POOL DIMENSIONS AND THE VALLEY WIDTH SHOWN ON THE
PLAN SHEETS.
THE CURVE BETWEEN THE PC AND PT SHOULD BE ROUNDED.
I C'(�C_NIn.
-Q� VERIFY BASED ON TYPICAL BANKFULL
0 VERTICAL CONTROL FROM PROFILE
R I FFLE
TYP rRn��—,�FrT i
MAX POOL
DEPTH
MEANDERING
POOL
/ TAIL OF RIFFLE
(TOR)
HEAD OF RIFFLE
(HOR)
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW SCHEMATIC
Ld
LL
Ll -
0
Q
Lv
S
POOL
-04
I
NOT TO SCALE
STREAM FLOW
TOP
=AN �ANKFULL
)— P =R PROFILE
RIFFLE SLOPE BANKFULL
(SEE PROFILE) DEPTH
LENGTH PER PROFILE
RIFFLE
zcl:�z
o<0
Q Lv 0
U LTJ
0 cn
~ m
Li Li
cr_ z
D 0
I
U U Q
» >
I-I-�
cn cn Li
P < opF
�O T
pERp�F o�
RUN
LENGTH PER
PROFILE
STRAIGHT POOL
TYP. CROSS—SECTION
0
STREAM FLOW w o
POOL
LENGTH PER
PROFILE
om q
DEPTH VARIES
BASED ON PROFILE
PER
GLIDE
LENGTH PER
PROFILE
TYPICAL PROFILE OF RIFFLE/POOL SEQUENCE
NOT TO SCALE
J
Li
Li
0
wQ:�
00
BANKFULL_
DEPTH
LENGTH PER PROFILE
POOL
W
Q
cn
Z
0
cn
W
O
z
a :�i
0LU
OO ch
Z
O CIA O
w
N J
N
�00Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
RIFFLE I 0
Z �
Q
C0 Q
N W co o
z�zO�
W 0 �
Q < Q w
0� 2icDll�
U Q
NW �
LL
I—
0
SHEET NUMBER
04
Y
0
O
-
O
E
w
-DO
O
wN
=
cn
0 (_0
O
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
o O
om
o
Q r-
\
z
z
`'
_
J(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
(n
Q
Q
U
RIFFLE I 0
Z �
Q
C0 Q
N W co o
z�zO�
W 0 �
Q < Q w
0� 2icDll�
U Q
NW �
LL
I—
0
SHEET NUMBER
04

m
U W
O
V) Q
Q
c EXISTING BERM/SPOIL
U TO BE REMOVED AND
0 USED AS CHANNEL FILL
T
N
m m
Y m m
O
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
21 18.0'
cn
z
m m
m m
U)
o >
w
3
--------cp 2.0' 7.1' 2.0' op
- - - -
co
6 3.7 3 1
Lo
0 0 0
z
Q
3.5'
C)
0
0
O
L
Y
O Z
ON O
w
oN J
a � O
cLi CA
Y
Li
UT1 REACH 1
p c Z
o �
w _
Z a O ~
NOT TO SCALE <
w rlo
� _
O
Q cn O
°
aO
>1
O
Li 1 6 EXISTING BERM/SPOIL N o
TO BE REMOVED AND _
USED AS CHANNEL FILL
E
� U
C
U p m m
fn m m
N TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
0 20.0'
>
U U
L
C
m m P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
Q NOT FOR
NQ 2.0' 8.2' 2.0' CONSTRUCTION
O E ------
Q
cc
�U
0 3. 1 a.
i � o
co N
3 a �
o
. o
U O
i
Q 4.0'
Q
c
N 3
U
T U
N
�D O
O
Z = Y a_
o U O Y m
w O O =
LLJ
a- o 0 (-oQ) UT1 REACH 2 \
m >- m
z o
U Q O Q\ Q Z Z mLLJ
a = 0-)� U
Y0 O Q cn Q w
NOT TO SCALE
Q
aN
0�
Ln
�o z
�6
0T O
O
?0-
0 O �
N
Nc
U
EXISTING BERM/SPOIL (f�
> TO BE REMOVED AND
CL co USED AS CHANNEL FILL J
n I Q
�o
z EXISTING
° CHANNEL WIDTH
WVARIES
U�
Ln�
°20:1 20:1
0 —
N
Q
C�
Q
Q
�Q) Nw
m� v
N
�° z�zo
C)
w Q O w
z �
> Q
UQ V`
O Q \ w
C
� OU � � V
N
U UT3Q
w NCL OT TO SCALE
Y Q)
mF
SHEET NUMBER
UO
co o 50. -c:

U
C
N
_O
U
O
Q
U
O
T
N
Y
O
2
0
3
a
U
V)
U
C
N
_O
U
O
Q
C)
�o
� T
= E
Y
r T
Y
� O
Q O
a
Z a
< a
Z c
U
< o
Y +�
� a
> N
� O
a
cf)c
cnc
C
U
a o
9 3z
U c
U a
> E
J U
/ o
< s
J
/ c
o
� a
U
N U
�L
Q
0
QQ
E
o�
�c
U U
C
/ O
i
N N
C�
C�
(D�
�U
�u)
n 3
� U
Y �
1 3
J 0
J
� U
c
E U
CL Q)
0
� a
� U
U
N
p Q
N
� a
V �
O
Q T
N c
0
O
(D -O
�Q)
c)--Q
c
-L,
_�
�N
-Lj N
Y O
Z a
Q a
E
Z
J a
1 •-
J �
J a
< v)
Y U
-J
> a
O O
T O
O N
J �
Q
9 u
V
>
J a
a
U w
n a
U
N 0
� O
N
N
U
t
N �
U- O
CL +
N
Y U
N
>, E
U
U O
Q�
0�
W
Q
I I I
NORTH
SHEET
-3nrZrZ i
SHEET
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
� 0 100 200 400
I
I �
i
I
I
1 I
1 �
I �
cn
T
— / `•'
;v
WEYERHAEUSER OWNED
PROPERTY
\
N
SHEET 11
\
1
1
1
1
I
U)
z
0
U)
w
O
z
a
LU
O0 ch
Z
O O
W
_
N J
cf) O �
N
� Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
U
_
O
Y
:2i
:E
E
Lij O
O
�
N
=
��
m
m
�Lno
ooQomo
w
\
w
_
O-)
_j
0
�
U
Y0
o
w
U
cf)
Q
lh�
Q
=
U
\
I
U)
z
0
U)
w
O
z
a
LU
O0 ch
Z
O O
W
_
N J
cf) O �
N
� Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
z
w
U
0
z
z
Q
J
J
J
Lu
0
0
z
1
w
VZ
5\
L
Q
Nw
LL
w
w
2
C)
w
712
n�
V./
z
m O CZ$
z LL
0 Lu
G/' L
�\ w
V
1►
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
06
U
_
O
Y
:2i
:E
E
Lij O
O
�
N
=
��
m
m
�Lno
ooQomo
w
w
_
O-)
_j
0
�
U
Y0
o
w
U
cf)
Q
lh�
Q
=
U
N
z
w
U
0
z
z
Q
J
J
J
Lu
0
0
z
1
w
VZ
5\
L
Q
Nw
LL
w
w
2
C)
w
712
n�
V./
z
m O CZ$
z LL
0 Lu
G/' L
�\ w
V
1►
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
06

U
C
N
_O
U
O
Q
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
U
U
Z
0
F—
a
ry
0
0
O
Y
t
3
O
48
:2i
E
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
V)
44
U
�\
Q
c
m
>_
m
Ln
40
0
U
0
O
\
z
z
`'
_
a
36
C
U
U
UW
0 00
± roz
S
32
cn
PRO
T
ADE
E
Y
28
iJ T
J �
� O
Y
24
1 °
� o
Z °
Q °
a
20
Z
c
EXIS
J
DE
�
�o
16
N
�N
/ O
cn
°
12
E
cf) c
c: 3
U
/
�
_° 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50
>�
� U
Q O
J o
C
m o
D
Q)
C U
C
QL
Q
� o
o Q
�E
(DU
cn
Do
C�
9+00 9+50
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
10+00
n —
/ \v \30
1 0
_ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
ti I \ � ., :. , ..� .:... 5 \ \ Q � \ t a / � ` \ � / y � �1 / � _j 1 0 20 40 80
CL
�L PSED BRUSH TOE (TSP.) Q rr
_
' �,': �� PROPOSED BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFL TYP ( J
��\�\\\ �� =��E/ DE�TA1•L 5 SKEET l�0 0 ( / 1 ` r
r \ �
° s \ 1 o I SEE DET W_ --1,-SHEETW4f
V G/ / 1 /
\ PROPOSED LOGVA�ETY. a r / a l )Z ��\:SE� DETAIL �HEET 15UU frz
� I , ✓�
r
J
Q/ STA: 1+07\
\
BEGIN UT1 — REACH 1 A�"p��r;:�;,.. ]� �—v�c
\ BEGIN PRIORITY I RESTORATION W\ p0� _ , I
� /i rv�\r\\�`"+�.:�,?4 .:. ✓f1f ,�� -J �1 —�5k r —a - ���,�� \ FJ�-
00
n U \ j \\ L L,S - I \ l\ `\,\ \,'..:...:• \ l < <� r / c� rti B ��/ (0 l S l/ e I 1 i o
\ /\\✓\ o 1
XX LFr 6F XX TO BE R V �� :'.. < f — \ — L �� v 8 a \ ?
¢/ \ �y7
V �
_ p.
L �^ — IN
PROPOSED 39 LF OF CM J _ _ __ _
to
'6 vr ti
/ \
p dI
z o f \ u 4,�..° l / r o \ ° \ / \ l — \ �� —'\
�� _ S o;:.•'., \ ` f J \ PROPOSED\ C ANND f:EL\E!14,(TY)
J� �_^� = — ✓ ti �.:>j:.::.�:: �� / ��\ \ z 1� �J f SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET 17 ��
co
1 \�\ =� / / — �� I o � ..� c J j PROPOSED LOG CROSS VAN 4T*y
o (\
_ �; �_ J�� J — V �� ...�... ` a \� DEE DETAILA SHEET 16 �� 6`_ G� S� o f\\ o
o
/\
�� l /
f
j
CE
o 9
L� �/ �\ I �ti ` /^'o�,',.::q:.. •,:. tl,.`\( C5r — \ �xC
CECE \
v \
r
- L
�\ \�7 � � � 1i�o �, y o �� I// °\� � :;.L.:•:.:•:�... \ 1�� < �� _, / � / � � � \moi �� ° -��� a �� e�B �\
J
d \ \
CL
I `\ o
T E J ° \\ > r O / J l /� r ..,,:.� \ �� o /�; \��>� \` ) J/ Irl \✓ ✓ I > C�\ � r
/
0�
ml
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
OIz
a
LU
OO Z
chO 0
CIAW
N J
� O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
W
o
�oL
�ro
Q
_ po
O
cn O
O
N W
■� o
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Z
0
F—
a
ry
0
0
Y
U O
O
:2i
E
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0 (
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q r-
\
z
z
`'
_
J(�
U
Y O
UW
0 00
± roz
S
cn
PRO
OSED G
ADE
EXIS
ING GR
DE
c~n w m
PROP SED B
NKFULL
BAN
FULLS
OPE _
.,28
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
�
_° 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50
>�
� U
Q O
J o
C
m o
D
Q)
C U
C
QL
Q
� o
o Q
�E
(DU
cn
Do
C�
9+00 9+50
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
10+00
n —
/ \v \30
1 0
_ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
ti I \ � ., :. , ..� .:... 5 \ \ Q � \ t a / � ` \ � / y � �1 / � _j 1 0 20 40 80
CL
�L PSED BRUSH TOE (TSP.) Q rr
_
' �,': �� PROPOSED BRUSH AND ROLL RIFFL TYP ( J
��\�\\\ �� =��E/ DE�TA1•L 5 SKEET l�0 0 ( / 1 ` r
r \ �
° s \ 1 o I SEE DET W_ --1,-SHEETW4f
V G/ / 1 /
\ PROPOSED LOGVA�ETY. a r / a l )Z ��\:SE� DETAIL �HEET 15UU frz
� I , ✓�
r
J
Q/ STA: 1+07\
\
BEGIN UT1 — REACH 1 A�"p��r;:�;,.. ]� �—v�c
\ BEGIN PRIORITY I RESTORATION W\ p0� _ , I
� /i rv�\r\\�`"+�.:�,?4 .:. ✓f1f ,�� -J �1 —�5k r —a - ���,�� \ FJ�-
00
n U \ j \\ L L,S - I \ l\ `\,\ \,'..:...:• \ l < <� r / c� rti B ��/ (0 l S l/ e I 1 i o
\ /\\✓\ o 1
XX LFr 6F XX TO BE R V �� :'.. < f — \ — L �� v 8 a \ ?
¢/ \ �y7
V �
_ p.
L �^ — IN
PROPOSED 39 LF OF CM J _ _ __ _
to
'6 vr ti
/ \
p dI
z o f \ u 4,�..° l / r o \ ° \ / \ l — \ �� —'\
�� _ S o;:.•'., \ ` f J \ PROPOSED\ C ANND f:EL\E!14,(TY)
J� �_^� = — ✓ ti �.:>j:.::.�:: �� / ��\ \ z 1� �J f SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET 17 ��
co
1 \�\ =� / / — �� I o � ..� c J j PROPOSED LOG CROSS VAN 4T*y
o (\
_ �; �_ J�� J — V �� ...�... ` a \� DEE DETAILA SHEET 16 �� 6`_ G� S� o f\\ o
o
/\
�� l /
f
j
CE
o 9
L� �/ �\ I �ti ` /^'o�,',.::q:.. •,:. tl,.`\( C5r — \ �xC
CECE \
v \
r
- L
�\ \�7 � � � 1i�o �, y o �� I// °\� � :;.L.:•:.:•:�... \ 1�� < �� _, / � / � � � \moi �� ° -��� a �� e�B �\
J
d \ \
CL
I `\ o
T E J ° \\ > r O / J l /� r ..,,:.� \ �� o /�; \��>� \` ) J/ Irl \✓ ✓ I > C�\ � r
/
0�
ml
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
OIz
a
LU
OO Z
chO 0
CIAW
N J
� O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
W
o
�oL
�ro
Q
_ po
O
cn O
O
N W
■� o
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Lu
0=
^� U
I..L
0 w
z
Q
r
Z
Z)
^J
L.L
0
Z �
Q
N w m QJ
Z °
Z
W 00�
Q ~
Q Q w
U Q
w C
G
SHEET NUMBER
07
Y
U O
O
:2i
E
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0 (
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q r-
\
z
z
`'
_
J(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
cn
o
o
c)
Lu
0=
^� U
I..L
0 w
z
Q
r
Z
Z)
^J
L.L
0
Z �
Q
N w m QJ
Z °
Z
W 00�
Q ~
Q Q w
U Q
w C
G
SHEET NUMBER
07

U
48
N
C
0
V)
44
U
C
O
N
:2i
O
U
O
O
wN
co
a
_O
U
a
O
32
(")
Q
m
� T
>_
m
E
c) O
J Y
Q
� T
0
Y
\
�
1
Z
ZLLJ
24
U
0)
Z
< o
C
C)
U
O
o
< a
S
C
S
T
o
N
N
/ a
16
Cn N
N O
Y
O
cn U
T
o C
Q�
U
N
$
U
O
t
3
°
48
N
Y
0
V)
44
U
C
O
40
:2i
O
U
O
O
wN
co
a
36
a
°
32
(")
Q
m
� T
>_
m
E
c) O
J Y
28
� T
0
Y
\
�
1
Z
ZLLJ
24
_ 0
0)
Z
< o
(�
C)
U
Z °
o
< a
20
C
S
Z a
o
o
N
/ a
16
Cn N
N O
cn U
12
o C
Q�
N
$
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
>0 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00
J 3
c
2 a
< E
J
/ U
co
N t
UJ '
U C
N O
C
N
U
C
C) -
0
O O
V U
C O
/ E
N
c
3 C
N U
U w
O
L
N N
T �
N U
J
n < I 1 �r c< �1 ��\rrno
> �s << �I << l,a S 1 ��<<� �� �,/' (�� - :I ;. -� -� « <�� L' (,� Q - ��� v 30� 303 v
% �\ 3O
Vl �i A o .V - - V� . ` < > 30_ NORTH
_3O _� �� ( �J / /� - - v 0o / ( \ A / GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�<�� ° < I / (<I� - �- - - V V I �� VA g� > '� EXISTING POND TO (6E DRAINED - S 0 20 40 80
_J j0
Do
rl
a
1
e
T �/ \✓= O I 1 C, i Ifs /—��� �-'' o ����p / �, \ \ _- ��'�' �'/ / � __�� � J-" % _�_ _ `_� � / � �/ < o j �< \
+
B \\ �� /— C - - - - \_ ( �s'4: Ili �� o\�� ° °
r
W oo -✓— =- �J� o� I ` \ r .r...;: / < B Zp y �°
1 W \ C 7r — �� \ J �¢ .. \ I J _ ° M \� 1 < v v v I /� _�\ �9
Z 2 �V �- '`DO �. .I .� / - o v 4p<vv ry
r 13� \ - o < \ .d p0-
\ o J 00 - 6X S ) 1 ` / j: k I , e � o / ,► \ \
W
r - U ° <
9+Op 8 — r� <� ` \ J (/ - �t�-F C7\\ s j \ ��B 1 �,.:�':: � �r J< \\ �� � O\ < ° \ \� A 00�
.: .Jlr
6 �.�... l J _-.�, --\ �> v l 074
< IC
v) M C�\/ • 1.,.1...'..l ) ( /\\ i\ ��s �� C�%\\
i
i Q N r �\ /> \� �J �1 c _ r. �: s..:. r( �UTJ� \ ° 006 <� J �N
13_j
STA: 15+71<)
o - / 1 r/ / I r �✓ �^ END UT1 -REACH 1
BEGIN UT1 -REACH 2
STA: 109+40
'�� \ �/ a �< END UT2 ✓ �/ J .:J.�:. �1.. III/
a ///� /i-� �` / _ ` �� �
<% `:� ;....• 1y I <� ` `l o `' ` l \ I I I
/j�/� // �/ �� — , f� l l v o l ��� \ -�"J e C —' � S � ji •I J � �/~ 1 ( l — \ J � c � l � � _'-^= C
vI
CE / �� lf':..J:.:..a �� \ > �< �� ��
CE CE CE
CE CE f. �. IlI ��
�
Q d a v 1: F
F I
rl
° � \ � �� � r �r`�o � ,-� C <� J , � � :`;� ::.., : • ( , J L � < � t1 1 Z J / C / � \ 5 � � r � � J CEi
o�
i ~
ml
W
Q
U)
z
O
U)
W
OIz
a
LU
OO Z
cho 0
CIAW
_
� _j
N J
� O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
Y
U O
O
:2i
O
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
ZLLJ
_ 0
0)
O
O
�o
(�
U
o
UW
<
S
cn
o
o
c)
Q w
Ei w
PROPOSE[)
BANK
ULL
EXISTING
GR
DE
PROPOSED
GRADE
BANKFULL
SLOPE-----'
.14%
,- -
-
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
>0 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00
J 3
c
2 a
< E
J
/ U
co
N t
UJ '
U C
N O
C
N
U
C
C) -
0
O O
V U
C O
/ E
N
c
3 C
N U
U w
O
L
N N
T �
N U
J
n < I 1 �r c< �1 ��\rrno
> �s << �I << l,a S 1 ��<<� �� �,/' (�� - :I ;. -� -� « <�� L' (,� Q - ��� v 30� 303 v
% �\ 3O
Vl �i A o .V - - V� . ` < > 30_ NORTH
_3O _� �� ( �J / /� - - v 0o / ( \ A / GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�<�� ° < I / (<I� - �- - - V V I �� VA g� > '� EXISTING POND TO (6E DRAINED - S 0 20 40 80
_J j0
Do
rl
a
1
e
T �/ \✓= O I 1 C, i Ifs /—��� �-'' o ����p / �, \ \ _- ��'�' �'/ / � __�� � J-" % _�_ _ `_� � / � �/ < o j �< \
+
B \\ �� /— C - - - - \_ ( �s'4: Ili �� o\�� ° °
r
W oo -✓— =- �J� o� I ` \ r .r...;: / < B Zp y �°
1 W \ C 7r — �� \ J �¢ .. \ I J _ ° M \� 1 < v v v I /� _�\ �9
Z 2 �V �- '`DO �. .I .� / - o v 4p<vv ry
r 13� \ - o < \ .d p0-
\ o J 00 - 6X S ) 1 ` / j: k I , e � o / ,► \ \
W
r - U ° <
9+Op 8 — r� <� ` \ J (/ - �t�-F C7\\ s j \ ��B 1 �,.:�':: � �r J< \\ �� � O\ < ° \ \� A 00�
.: .Jlr
6 �.�... l J _-.�, --\ �> v l 074
< IC
v) M C�\/ • 1.,.1...'..l ) ( /\\ i\ ��s �� C�%\\
i
i Q N r �\ /> \� �J �1 c _ r. �: s..:. r( �UTJ� \ ° 006 <� J �N
13_j
STA: 15+71<)
o - / 1 r/ / I r �✓ �^ END UT1 -REACH 1
BEGIN UT1 -REACH 2
STA: 109+40
'�� \ �/ a �< END UT2 ✓ �/ J .:J.�:. �1.. III/
a ///� /i-� �` / _ ` �� �
<% `:� ;....• 1y I <� ` `l o `' ` l \ I I I
/j�/� // �/ �� — , f� l l v o l ��� \ -�"J e C —' � S � ji •I J � �/~ 1 ( l — \ J � c � l � � _'-^= C
vI
CE / �� lf':..J:.:..a �� \ > �< �� ��
CE CE CE
CE CE f. �. IlI ��
�
Q d a v 1: F
F I
rl
° � \ � �� � r �r`�o � ,-� C <� J , � � :`;� ::.., : • ( , J L � < � t1 1 Z J / C / � \ 5 � � r � � J CEi
o�
i ~
ml
W
Q
U)
z
O
U)
W
OIz
a
LU
OO Z
cho 0
CIAW
_
� _j
N J
� O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
W
J N
LL W
0 �
U
0
z W
Q
Z
Z)
0-
0
z �
Q
N W m o
Z
3:z O
W 0 0 �
�QQ ~ a
Q w
U Q
W �
SHEET NUMBER
08
Y
U O
O
:2i
O
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
ZLLJ
_ 0
0)
�
(�
U
o
UW
<
S
cn
o
o
c)
W
J N
LL W
0 �
U
0
z W
Q
Z
Z)
0-
0
z �
Q
N W m o
Z
3:z O
W 0 0 �
�QQ ~ a
Q w
U Q
W �
SHEET NUMBER
08

(3
48
C
Y
N
V)
44
_O
U
�J
O
1
V)
V)
40
Q
�\
Q
U
m
O
>_
m
U
c) O
C
0
O
0
S
36
T
Z
N
�'
_
Y
(�
O
32
T
T
U
S
U
O
28
t
C)
3
°
48
Y
U
O
V)
44
U
�J
c
1
40
0 (
O
�\
Q
U
m
O
>_
m
co
c) O
co
0
m
0
a
36
Z
°
�'
_
°
(�
32
Y O
T
�
S
E
U Y
28
S T
C)
J �
� O
Y
1 0
24
r��
Z °
—
a
20
Z �
°
J
PROPOSED
�o
16
N. N
/o
c�
0°
12
C
cn c
c 0
�20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50
Q U
N C
cn O
D
N N
C U
C
CL
�L
°
Q
o°
Q
U E
C •-
/ p
C
N O
D 16
U O
U N
L U)
T N
i7
30
30 C
30 30 30
01
Y 3 I 35
30
J � _ 1
/ C� a ^� O z✓ v ��� r d r` J ° a-�/ l�� ��✓— /I�� \v �3'J q %
_ _ J
30
� � } � ` fl 7 0,/,
✓
\
Y
U
O
O
:2i
�J
w
�O
1
0 (
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
/
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
Z
Z
�'
_
J
(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
f�
o
C)
L
\
r��
r� \
—
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
BANKF LL
EXISTING
GRAD
-
-
-
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
c 0
�20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50
Q U
N C
cn O
D
N N
C U
C
CL
�L
°
Q
o°
Q
U E
C •-
/ p
C
N O
D 16
U O
U N
L U)
T N
i7
30
30 C
30 30 30
01
Y 3 I 35
30
J � _ 1
/ C� a ^� O z✓ v ��� r d r` J ° a-�/ l�� ��✓— /I�� \v �3'J q %
_ _ J
30
� � } � ` fl 7 0,/,
✓
\
Q
V �\ j� \�-� %--_
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
30+00
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
e
o - p
-O—✓ J -lam i i'�✓ J ✓�--`.� — — �n B — .i l___ ✓\ —B
�. — / �— ��' — —i= -� 1 - - /\\\� \- -� ` \^� > n� O o < /, ✓ / his� — �� !I ��J o o Q
v v A p 0 1�'A
Nay C°C °ve°\\\\—� C J
��
— ` 1 O \ as v
r
-
- - - _
Of,
I �� J r /— �1 / v v ✓/ —= /�� ^\\\ —� \\�l� X30 = ��• \ Q X ��
- ' I "����\�-_-� � / � \ %9e ���� y .A e _ ,° v �' ✓�� �\ � ��I ° v v �- /f /,//- � A\/B\� 8 — � �_`!� J~� �L�,-_ 1�� �—�'��✓l ''• _� v �\��,
O ` Q f V• �p v g� v vr�
n \
_324 oo \�
° 3 r
j B�Jti�J �
v
r o \ x \ / J I \ \` / 0 \\ - \ \
1v 1 -F _ _ /moi Ll o -
m �\ 0-
Z ° �Q / ^ J� \�� \ / �j ���J \�� ~\///� \ S✓ o _/ �—/` \i �J �\ \�1� / ���� - � /'o'er i //�
LJ v
\� \ - `I �� ✓ 1 -_,rte ` / l ' \ I J l % \ , J -� N �J
L'n'j
0 C '1 ' \� f ^ /� i J ,✓` '/_rl r I /1 ,\ \\ \ / \ v —�._ �/ EA J
c Q 11 i i �/ °— 1 t / ` f \ I r J /( J / / ✓ 1 J\ L -� n —� L� \ I o J`/ I
J a
�</�
i- \tel7
Q) co
` d
n o
a J l 1 \ ll (� o J z7 I (� / s ^ a L
ri
' \ I) / e /\ ° ✓ �/ ��/ t/ -� -moi
cti3 � S �� I— � \ � ` �\ �1 I / G S\\� Iry �1/� J�v
U
'4.
I I -_ J \ Q ✓/ // J ✓ J Jv o L E __j
1t^�J ` 1/// /\. `�s < �� ill ✓/ 1� C�1r� f ��/ �\J �C
I, y o \l �r --J Ia (rte' o
CE
77
CE
Y ° °�:\, J rI CE J ' r
T I I o I
C L� \� \ \� J C o
CE o < — ar� / r � ISN
QE
L-7 S < l /
0�
W
Q
U)
z
O
W
O
z
LU
O Z
OCIA 0
�
O
W
N J
cf) O �
N _
P--� Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
U
O
O
:2i
�J
w
�O
1
0 (
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
/
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
Z
Z
�'
_
J
(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
f�
o
C)
L
\
r��
r� \
—
Q
V �\ j� \�-� %--_
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
30+00
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
e
o - p
-O—✓ J -lam i i'�✓ J ✓�--`.� — — �n B — .i l___ ✓\ —B
�. — / �— ��' — —i= -� 1 - - /\\\� \- -� ` \^� > n� O o < /, ✓ / his� — �� !I ��J o o Q
v v A p 0 1�'A
Nay C°C °ve°\\\\—� C J
��
— ` 1 O \ as v
r
-
- - - _
Of,
I �� J r /— �1 / v v ✓/ —= /�� ^\\\ —� \\�l� X30 = ��• \ Q X ��
- ' I "����\�-_-� � / � \ %9e ���� y .A e _ ,° v �' ✓�� �\ � ��I ° v v �- /f /,//- � A\/B\� 8 — � �_`!� J~� �L�,-_ 1�� �—�'��✓l ''• _� v �\��,
O ` Q f V• �p v g� v vr�
n \
_324 oo \�
° 3 r
j B�Jti�J �
v
r o \ x \ / J I \ \` / 0 \\ - \ \
1v 1 -F _ _ /moi Ll o -
m �\ 0-
Z ° �Q / ^ J� \�� \ / �j ���J \�� ~\///� \ S✓ o _/ �—/` \i �J �\ \�1� / ���� - � /'o'er i //�
LJ v
\� \ - `I �� ✓ 1 -_,rte ` / l ' \ I J l % \ , J -� N �J
L'n'j
0 C '1 ' \� f ^ /� i J ,✓` '/_rl r I /1 ,\ \\ \ / \ v —�._ �/ EA J
c Q 11 i i �/ °— 1 t / ` f \ I r J /( J / / ✓ 1 J\ L -� n —� L� \ I o J`/ I
J a
�</�
i- \tel7
Q) co
` d
n o
a J l 1 \ ll (� o J z7 I (� / s ^ a L
ri
' \ I) / e /\ ° ✓ �/ ��/ t/ -� -moi
cti3 � S �� I— � \ � ` �\ �1 I / G S\\� Iry �1/� J�v
U
'4.
I I -_ J \ Q ✓/ // J ✓ J Jv o L E __j
1t^�J ` 1/// /\. `�s < �� ill ✓/ 1� C�1r� f ��/ �\J �C
I, y o \l �r --J Ia (rte' o
CE
77
CE
Y ° °�:\, J rI CE J ' r
T I I o I
C L� \� \ \� J C o
CE o < — ar� / r � ISN
QE
L-7 S < l /
0�
W
Q
U)
z
O
W
O
z
LU
O Z
OCIA 0
�
O
W
N J
cf) O �
N _
P--� Y
Ld
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Cfl
N
z
W
Q
U
0
z
Q
>w
z
Q
Q
w
712
QJ
z
Q
m O CC$
z "
0 �
Q Lu
h'l'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
09
Y
U
O
O
:2i
O
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0 (
O
�\
Q
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
Z
Z
�'
_
J
(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
Q
o
C)
Cfl
N
z
W
Q
U
0
z
Q
>w
z
Q
Q
w
712
QJ
z
Q
m O CC$
z "
0 �
Q Lu
h'l'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
09

U
C
N
_O
U
O
Q
a
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
U
U
O
t
3
�
� 30+00 30+50 31+00
Q�
>�
� U
< O
J a
/ N
V •-
C
m O
D
Q)
C U
C
QL
Q
� o
O a
�E
/a
(DU
cn
Do
c: u)
31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
\ Z '\6
Q - _ ; NORTH
J
J" / A I I /\ �� V 1
J \\ l I \ I \ f r -
/ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
as
N �\� 0 20 40 80
� / L�
— ,
l / aco
43
I as
a / Al ��/ / �� �v �x00 c ca (� ✓
\ _ P
l \ 1 v 1—
i\ L �f / / �1 /L I — 0 / g —�� — a �l �� i 1p�x Q?— LA
1_ 8�— \ o
/— v - Aj
n a l \ ��� � � n /r/
L)
Y / o ��� ) ( f ( — /✓ \ < j ��// ( �✓/ l �> \ o \ STA: 38+03 c 1 RI
�
a UT1 REACH L B S^
Q_ STA: 210+26
e �o
END UT3 / I�
L I \�� vC a -7 QIIl \i i r .< , \/�\�— - 1o\
o v
17
_-\
i o v / f —�\ -J\"a + ��f « J� �\ T// /�/�J S/ �� / l�j\�\L f✓f��e�B/' — �,�� \�\� ��f� �� o /\ �
QL—✓ / , a
�B B Jim r�__✓—// / Ii r ° l \ �� 3�J J �\cl
X
g 0 O J
a L c a a° j/ C\\�fir--✓��\✓/ IC J `J !\ter /< / r g�lt
a i f —r •�� �� �� 7✓ / v ✓-
> / r J —I A l v
01 F
O
// 8 /
>
V. Vis. O 1 J
_
co
C \
Q � / I �� 7
7 I- l / I— I\\ i `) c 7
�OQ) 4� _ / O1 ✓m I I \ �� I r
✓ 'moi _ �� ] ��a$kp �e x0 / _� � �v / II n1✓�lid / !•�;� ,( •\�7> �, / r r) X , (\ J �J /1 Q/ ✓ �� \ �)� �� `
//� f /� �J as—�-8 - r �� Dom_`—�v/ ) ( I / o i`��. // / •, "r / •S• '/��J• / �\� r
� \\/S— O I �/ �, \ /�
CL —Cl a / �// — r /v �� 1 ( I' \ J /G� �� ZC �� / o J, J, • .``. ��. T 4 // • —!// o —` \(^ 11 \� J✓/ n I yJ� //b� l \ (�
co
Y N %�\ — J �� p
aO - J —
4 _ q
° ° C��.0 /� 1 \� \/ J r _— �/ �� �� /c , r— j_�G�, I� �, 1 J / / 1•. h O��
0 t
ml
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
ofz
a :�i
0LU
OO Z
chO O
CIAw
N J
cf) O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
44
V)
O
U
E
c
40
=
cn
_o
Q �\
U
m
°
36
co
c) O
Q
0
a
0
Q�
\
°
32
Z
LLJ
0
J0
U
Y O
28
UW
E
S
a Y
iJ T
0
J
U
24
o
Y
1 °
� U
20
Z°
< °
a
Z
?
16
�o
POSED
a
LL
� N
12
U U
Cc
m�
8
/
�
� 30+00 30+50 31+00
Q�
>�
� U
< O
J a
/ N
V •-
C
m O
D
Q)
C U
C
QL
Q
� o
O a
�E
/a
(DU
cn
Do
c: u)
31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
\ Z '\6
Q - _ ; NORTH
J
J" / A I I /\ �� V 1
J \\ l I \ I \ f r -
/ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
as
N �\� 0 20 40 80
� / L�
— ,
l / aco
43
I as
a / Al ��/ / �� �v �x00 c ca (� ✓
\ _ P
l \ 1 v 1—
i\ L �f / / �1 /L I — 0 / g —�� — a �l �� i 1p�x Q?— LA
1_ 8�— \ o
/— v - Aj
n a l \ ��� � � n /r/
L)
Y / o ��� ) ( f ( — /✓ \ < j ��// ( �✓/ l �> \ o \ STA: 38+03 c 1 RI
�
a UT1 REACH L B S^
Q_ STA: 210+26
e �o
END UT3 / I�
L I \�� vC a -7 QIIl \i i r .< , \/�\�— - 1o\
o v
17
_-\
i o v / f —�\ -J\"a + ��f « J� �\ T// /�/�J S/ �� / l�j\�\L f✓f��e�B/' — �,�� \�\� ��f� �� o /\ �
QL—✓ / , a
�B B Jim r�__✓—// / Ii r ° l \ �� 3�J J �\cl
X
g 0 O J
a L c a a° j/ C\\�fir--✓��\✓/ IC J `J !\ter /< / r g�lt
a i f —r •�� �� �� 7✓ / v ✓-
> / r J —I A l v
01 F
O
// 8 /
>
V. Vis. O 1 J
_
co
C \
Q � / I �� 7
7 I- l / I— I\\ i `) c 7
�OQ) 4� _ / O1 ✓m I I \ �� I r
✓ 'moi _ �� ] ��a$kp �e x0 / _� � �v / II n1✓�lid / !•�;� ,( •\�7> �, / r r) X , (\ J �J /1 Q/ ✓ �� \ �)� �� `
//� f /� �J as—�-8 - r �� Dom_`—�v/ ) ( I / o i`��. // / •, "r / •S• '/��J• / �\� r
� \\/S— O I �/ �, \ /�
CL —Cl a / �// — r /v �� 1 ( I' \ J /G� �� ZC �� / o J, J, • .``. ��. T 4 // • —!// o —` \(^ 11 \� J✓/ n I yJ� //b� l \ (�
co
Y N %�\ — J �� p
aO - J —
4 _ q
° ° C��.0 /� 1 \� \/ J r _— �/ �� �� /c , r— j_�G�, I� �, 1 J / / 1•. h O��
0 t
ml
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
ofz
a :�i
0LU
OO Z
chO O
CIAw
N J
cf) O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
U
O
O
:2i
E
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0 (_0�\
O
Q �\
�
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
w
Z
LLJ
_
J0
U
Y O
o
UW
<
S
cn
0
0
U
PR
POSED
BANKF
LL
�
+00
c�
ro N
EXISTING
RADE
cn w
PROPOSED
GRADE
_
__
_
BANKFULL
SLOPE
= 0.22%
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
�
� 30+00 30+50 31+00
Q�
>�
� U
< O
J a
/ N
V •-
C
m O
D
Q)
C U
C
QL
Q
� o
O a
�E
/a
(DU
cn
Do
c: u)
31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
\ Z '\6
Q - _ ; NORTH
J
J" / A I I /\ �� V 1
J \\ l I \ I \ f r -
/ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
as
N �\� 0 20 40 80
� / L�
— ,
l / aco
43
I as
a / Al ��/ / �� �v �x00 c ca (� ✓
\ _ P
l \ 1 v 1—
i\ L �f / / �1 /L I — 0 / g —�� — a �l �� i 1p�x Q?— LA
1_ 8�— \ o
/— v - Aj
n a l \ ��� � � n /r/
L)
Y / o ��� ) ( f ( — /✓ \ < j ��// ( �✓/ l �> \ o \ STA: 38+03 c 1 RI
�
a UT1 REACH L B S^
Q_ STA: 210+26
e �o
END UT3 / I�
L I \�� vC a -7 QIIl \i i r .< , \/�\�— - 1o\
o v
17
_-\
i o v / f —�\ -J\"a + ��f « J� �\ T// /�/�J S/ �� / l�j\�\L f✓f��e�B/' — �,�� \�\� ��f� �� o /\ �
QL—✓ / , a
�B B Jim r�__✓—// / Ii r ° l \ �� 3�J J �\cl
X
g 0 O J
a L c a a° j/ C\\�fir--✓��\✓/ IC J `J !\ter /< / r g�lt
a i f —r •�� �� �� 7✓ / v ✓-
> / r J —I A l v
01 F
O
// 8 /
>
V. Vis. O 1 J
_
co
C \
Q � / I �� 7
7 I- l / I— I\\ i `) c 7
�OQ) 4� _ / O1 ✓m I I \ �� I r
✓ 'moi _ �� ] ��a$kp �e x0 / _� � �v / II n1✓�lid / !•�;� ,( •\�7> �, / r r) X , (\ J �J /1 Q/ ✓ �� \ �)� �� `
//� f /� �J as—�-8 - r �� Dom_`—�v/ ) ( I / o i`��. // / •, "r / •S• '/��J• / �\� r
� \\/S— O I �/ �, \ /�
CL —Cl a / �// — r /v �� 1 ( I' \ J /G� �� ZC �� / o J, J, • .``. ��. T 4 // • —!// o —` \(^ 11 \� J✓/ n I yJ� //b� l \ (�
co
Y N %�\ — J �� p
aO - J —
4 _ q
° ° C��.0 /� 1 \� \/ J r _— �/ �� �� /c , r— j_�G�, I� �, 1 J / / 1•. h O��
0 t
ml
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
ofz
a :�i
0LU
OO Z
chO O
CIAw
N J
cf) O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
W
J
LL N
0=
U
Q
0 w
Z �
Z
Z)
I..L
0
z �
Q
Q
N Lu co v
z� Z °
�
W 00Lu
�Q< Q w
U Q
W �
c/)
)
SHEET NUMBER
10
Y
U
O
O
:2i
E
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0 (_0�\
O
Q �\
�
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
w
Z
LLJ
_
J0
U
Y O
o
UW
<
S
cn
0
0
U
W
J
LL N
0=
U
Q
0 w
Z �
Z
Z)
I..L
0
z �
Q
Q
N Lu co v
z� Z °
�
W 00Lu
�Q< Q w
U Q
W �
c/)
)
SHEET NUMBER
10

(3
C
N
_O
U
O
V)
V)
Q
a
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
U
U
O
t
3
N o 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50
c�
J m
44
V)
O
J a
U
E
c
40
=
m
c
O
(D U
C C
Q�
U
m
°
36
co
c) O
QL
a
0
Q
O
\
°
32
z
`'
0
0-)J
S
� C
N U
U
D O
N
28
E
U N
L u)
�
S
U Y
v
c
o
J
U
0_
24
� o
Y o
1
�
20
Z °
a
Z
?
16
"I -o
NN
Ij
/ O
12
c
(DU
c
8
C
N o 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50
c�
J m
� U
Q O
O
J a
:2i
E
w
� o
o
w N
=
m
c
O
(D U
C C
Q�
m
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
QL
m
0
Q
O
\
O a
aE
z
`'
C
/ a
0-)J
� C
N U
U
D O
N
o
U
U N
L u)
<
S
N U
v
c
o
\ O
U
0_
PROPO ED BAN
FULL
DO
Ij
z
L Q
EXISTING
G ADE
Lr)�o
� N W
PROP
SED G
ADE
Quo
__ J Z
N W W
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
N o 40+00 40+50 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50
c�
-30' q
\1
o
J m
� U
Q O
O
J a
:2i
E
w
� o
o
w N
=
m
c
O
(D U
C C
Q�
m
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
QL
m
0
Q
O
\
O a
aE
z
`'
C
/ a
0-)J
� C
N U
U
D O
N
o
U
U N
L u)
<
S
N U
v
c
o
\ O
U
0_
DO
Ij
-30' q
\1
o
'-do
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
X30
�i, i
30 l / / > NORTH
1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�\ Za
J\—\'�\\
_� i / �/_ <�/��— v � 9\- �\ ,/_--\�`-1_� - --_�� ! �� � \ 1 \ j �—�r�F� �' ✓� /'1) / � � uj
v
PROPOSED LOGS SILL (TYP.)
J oy) J B x� h / o vQQ� �^ j�� \ SEE OEtAC 3 , SHEET 15
v / C I
/ ~
ho �o � v\�A � � STA: 47+66
\ 1 / f o
o - '45+--0 / C) �7I END UT1 — REACH 2 <>
/ B
0p�� v `�� e \� \l \ �/ / END PRIORITY (RESTORATION
l v / a
C'� N�\ �� \ f v v v�� v v
4 $'�\ B
o \ vvvvvv`d J 17N \ — i J , r ✓
00
>
�f 1\,
\\ J�
l�I/ J\�� / `} ��� �\J > ( \ ��1f 1� o �J L)
-71
L/ V11�
m
W
Q
U)
Z
0
W
O
z
L0
U
O Z
OCIA 0
�
O
w
_
N J
cf) O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
U
o
O
:2i
E
w
� o
o
w N
=
m
71
Q�
m
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q �
\
z
z
`'
_ 0
0-)J
0
U
Y O
'-do
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
X30
�i, i
30 l / / > NORTH
1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�\ Za
J\—\'�\\
_� i / �/_ <�/��— v � 9\- �\ ,/_--\�`-1_� - --_�� ! �� � \ 1 \ j �—�r�F� �' ✓� /'1) / � � uj
v
PROPOSED LOGS SILL (TYP.)
J oy) J B x� h / o vQQ� �^ j�� \ SEE OEtAC 3 , SHEET 15
v / C I
/ ~
ho �o � v\�A � � STA: 47+66
\ 1 / f o
o - '45+--0 / C) �7I END UT1 — REACH 2 <>
/ B
0p�� v `�� e \� \l \ �/ / END PRIORITY (RESTORATION
l v / a
C'� N�\ �� \ f v v v�� v v
4 $'�\ B
o \ vvvvvv`d J 17N \ — i J , r ✓
00
>
�f 1\,
\\ J�
l�I/ J\�� / `} ��� �\J > ( \ ��1f 1� o �J L)
-71
L/ V11�
m
W
Q
U)
Z
0
W
O
z
L0
U
O Z
OCIA 0
�
O
w
_
N J
cf) O �
N _
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
(D
N
z
w
NQ
L.L
U
Lu
J
� N
0=
^cl� U
I..L
ow
Z �
Q '
z
Z)
0
z
Q
w
0
z
CQ
G
Q
w
I`
712
z
Q
m O CZ$
zLL
0 Lu
Q Lu
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
11
Y
U
o
O
:2i
E
w
� o
o
w N
=
m
0 (_0�\
o
Q�
m
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q �
\
z
z
`'
_ 0
0-)J
0
U
Y O
o
U
W
<
S
c
o
o
U
(D
N
z
w
NQ
L.L
U
Lu
J
� N
0=
^cl� U
I..L
ow
Z �
Q '
z
Z)
0
z
Q
w
0
z
CQ
G
Q
w
I`
712
z
Q
m O CZ$
zLL
0 Lu
Q Lu
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
11

(3
C
N
_O
U
O
V)
V)
Q
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
U
U
O
t
3
V)
U
C
N
C)
U
O
Q
C
U
0
T
E
Y
T
C
O
0
U
=a
c
0
Y 0
Z
N
� N
Z 0
<�
< U
C
U
o
Cc
UQ)
o- E-
I I U
;p U
O
C �
N N
L
J C
/ o
� U
Q C
� L
Q
�E
a
U
0
-Q)
0 V)
U U
C
�L
Q
U Q
0
N 3
3
D t
Z) U
_n
/
o
D_ Q)
JI U
S 0
J c
V)
0
a
E
a
.n U
0_
N
DO
� T
c
0
c
a �
n >
V)
o
c
Y
V)
Z �
Q U
V)
z °
�c
1 �
C) a)
C V)
U V)
Q
c
>
U
_0
J C
U
n Q
U U
N C
U
u
U
i N
N �
o- O
CL
Q)
E-
0 O
N
o �
I I ~
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
100+00
100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
108+49
7
) 1 1 1 /
_ / �\ o F \ , o
/( J( ��� \ �� �� / v
i
�L� ——Jllt �� �t� \ /d V�\I1/S > r✓ ,\ , \ �� l I�'
his
v
\ /
30 30 �V �� li, r�� .: �•. oQ
j 4333
0
STA: 100+00
f- __j �> l) N\ �EGIN UT2D \ vl' �� D r ( z r \> /� — - co
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT T I ��`' > J,�/—,I I\\ ���'� `_ I 1 _ ��l /�''� ��'�\ � )��� � �
c� c \ ) n /
`J Ic l �\) l�_� O'�� �= — ! /—� \I \ a ENHANCEMENT LEVEL fl NG,UT2.
� ✓ / </ /� �\ \\\ \\`• \ J \ REMOVE SPOIL PILES' -AN AD / 150 FOOT
/WIDE RIPARIM BUFF ✓ a � / \ \ 6x0
rte %c) \\1\102� o < \/`/ J\ h' � r✓icy/ /\Z ���� �l �`/�/�/� �� \ \� V. j
xpp REMOVE BERM SPOIL PILE TYRI
0•
O
� a
C) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
+ 0 20 40 80
l \ j
( // ��_ \ J�` /✓ (1 v —\ I \�\ \� `l����! ��� \ / /� \/ I l� % �/ -
a -./// \ n�— �J�' �� -- /'� \ \ ( �, � � e / I � � ` � _ ) \ — —, _ - ✓ \ �, �- – y! �o `J � \c — � cil
ems109+O STA: 109+40
L—
� END U T2 �
r � -� -� - �+ / END ENHANCEMENT II
O \ �f v of ✓ f\ J `° J 1 rr \� �3X���1 n� v _ \ m - - - - /\ STA: CD
15+71 ) \
UT1 — REACH 2
\_� l � \ \ //✓ /t\�1 < �/� I ��108+ - - 5
_104+00=
J / \� I ///����\e 00 p ` r�
— _0
\\vL�
v
_0 — /^ (�I r /101ko_/. C. l �/ �� L L(� \ O (✓
- - - -
106
\co
J _ /
~J/ <J J L -�- -�- - - -. - - - -�l /�
1 — - -
r' �— \� f�/I I - - - - �- - �� - - - - �- -�. - - - - - - - - e I - Lu'—'
v
if `' �/ / J / �IL 7 ✓, rJl 1_l �(�11- . � - - - =J- - -�- - - - - I �x / 8 / _ \ o/
° fl �� / f j / ) j _� (� ( l I// \\ I / �i �l �,> �- - - -�-) - - - - - -\�� \ ��1( /rI � �l��/ �/ —�� I /�l/I ( IJ lam I \ 5\%/J �J� ✓`��\� ��\\\ �L\<\ J�ti—�/\ rI ��/� Iy` � �
> J _ W /< �\
I _
-� �- - GT -J-- - ✓ - -�>> - - /- j 9 �J` I I vo )�i 1 \ l�'
Lu
_ t
rJ ` �� /�// ���`l ���,� ,' !{Q\ I \� (lam`( `"'' i/ /�1\ \� �//\ � lJ -<-- -�=�-..
/ °—� �/\� S if Z_ r mss\ ( = —�3 +��- - (1- -/�� �1 (/ ��� —_�) (1 II IJ
(7
( 7 D
/1l 1 /J I JV j� Cf / J
\ fi r ) cruel T> L
�� lea �` �E
>XJ o,.Z_/ �/I ,,
�IJt� �� \ <^
/� v E f�/� <�� 1
CF '/ Jr�-V/. J ��( �Fv� 7
W
Q
U)
z
0
W
O
z
LU
O Z
ch
CIA O
W
_
� _j
N J
� O �
N
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
U
O
o
:2i
p
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
��
Q �\
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q �
\
z
z
J
_
J(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
cn
o
o
c)
EXISTING
GRADE --\PROPOSE[
GRADE
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
100+50 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
108+49
7
) 1 1 1 /
_ / �\ o F \ , o
/( J( ��� \ �� �� / v
i
�L� ——Jllt �� �t� \ /d V�\I1/S > r✓ ,\ , \ �� l I�'
his
v
\ /
30 30 �V �� li, r�� .: �•. oQ
j 4333
0
STA: 100+00
f- __j �> l) N\ �EGIN UT2D \ vl' �� D r ( z r \> /� — - co
BEGIN ENHANCEMENT T I ��`' > J,�/—,I I\\ ���'� `_ I 1 _ ��l /�''� ��'�\ � )��� � �
c� c \ ) n /
`J Ic l �\) l�_� O'�� �= — ! /—� \I \ a ENHANCEMENT LEVEL fl NG,UT2.
� ✓ / </ /� �\ \\\ \\`• \ J \ REMOVE SPOIL PILES' -AN AD / 150 FOOT
/WIDE RIPARIM BUFF ✓ a � / \ \ 6x0
rte %c) \\1\102� o < \/`/ J\ h' � r✓icy/ /\Z ���� �l �`/�/�/� �� \ \� V. j
xpp REMOVE BERM SPOIL PILE TYRI
0•
O
� a
C) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
+ 0 20 40 80
l \ j
( // ��_ \ J�` /✓ (1 v —\ I \�\ \� `l����! ��� \ / /� \/ I l� % �/ -
a -./// \ n�— �J�' �� -- /'� \ \ ( �, � � e / I � � ` � _ ) \ — —, _ - ✓ \ �, �- – y! �o `J � \c — � cil
ems109+O STA: 109+40
L—
� END U T2 �
r � -� -� - �+ / END ENHANCEMENT II
O \ �f v of ✓ f\ J `° J 1 rr \� �3X���1 n� v _ \ m - - - - /\ STA: CD
15+71 ) \
UT1 — REACH 2
\_� l � \ \ //✓ /t\�1 < �/� I ��108+ - - 5
_104+00=
J / \� I ///����\e 00 p ` r�
— _0
\\vL�
v
_0 — /^ (�I r /101ko_/. C. l �/ �� L L(� \ O (✓
- - - -
106
\co
J _ /
~J/ <J J L -�- -�- - - -. - - - -�l /�
1 — - -
r' �— \� f�/I I - - - - �- - �� - - - - �- -�. - - - - - - - - e I - Lu'—'
v
if `' �/ / J / �IL 7 ✓, rJl 1_l �(�11- . � - - - =J- - -�- - - - - I �x / 8 / _ \ o/
° fl �� / f j / ) j _� (� ( l I// \\ I / �i �l �,> �- - - -�-) - - - - - -\�� \ ��1( /rI � �l��/ �/ —�� I /�l/I ( IJ lam I \ 5\%/J �J� ✓`��\� ��\\\ �L\<\ J�ti—�/\ rI ��/� Iy` � �
> J _ W /< �\
I _
-� �- - GT -J-- - ✓ - -�>> - - /- j 9 �J` I I vo )�i 1 \ l�'
Lu
_ t
rJ ` �� /�// ���`l ���,� ,' !{Q\ I \� (lam`( `"'' i/ /�1\ \� �//\ � lJ -<-- -�=�-..
/ °—� �/\� S if Z_ r mss\ ( = —�3 +��- - (1- -/�� �1 (/ ��� —_�) (1 II IJ
(7
( 7 D
/1l 1 /J I JV j� Cf / J
\ fi r ) cruel T> L
�� lea �` �E
>XJ o,.Z_/ �/I ,,
�IJt� �� \ <^
/� v E f�/� <�� 1
CF '/ Jr�-V/. J ��( �Fv� 7
W
Q
U)
z
0
W
O
z
LU
O Z
ch
CIA O
W
_
� _j
N J
� O �
N
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
N
z
W
N�
L.L
U
Lu
J
LL
O
L^.L
I..L
0
z
Q
z
Q
n�
0
z
Q
w
Vz`
C\
G
Q
w
1
`N
1
Z)
712
Q,
z crJ
Q
m O CZ$
z "
O Lu
Q Lu
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
12
Y
U
O
o
:2i
p
w
�O
O
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
��
Q �\
(")
Q
m
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q �
\
z
z
J
_
J(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
cn
o
o
c)
N
z
W
N�
L.L
U
Lu
J
LL
O
L^.L
I..L
0
z
Q
z
Q
n�
0
z
Q
w
Vz`
C\
G
Q
w
1
`N
1
Z)
712
Q,
z crJ
Q
m O CZ$
z "
O Lu
Q Lu
h'o'
CI
SHEET NUMBER
12

(3
52
C
Y
N
V)
48
_O
U
E
O
o
wN
V)
V)
44
Q
�\
Q
U
O
>_
m
U
c) O
C
0
O
0
S
40
T
Z
N
_
Y
0
O
36
T
T
W
U
S
U
O
32
t
U
3
C
°
52
Y
U
o
V)
48
U
E
c
o
wN
=
cn
44
0(_0
O
�\
Q
U
O
>_
m
co
c) O
0
m
0
a
40
Z
°
_
°
0
36
Y O
T
W
�
S
E
Y
32
T
U
C
O
28 R
°
°
a
24
°
Y O
1
20
� N
N
z LO
�5
Q
16
C
�'
12
�0 200+00 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00 208+50 209+00 209+50 210+00
U '
QE-
/ U
;p U
O
C �
N N
L
J c
/ o
� U
Q C
� L
°
Q
U E
a
°
6
-Q)
O u)
U O
� ami
C)
tip/ ( l �ry
\ \ L J ✓ v
Z) Q � I<<' -1 >v 1 \
v
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
210+50
r > \ \ s GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
o
30 s ( r ^ A 3030
a j rI \ \ I�> ����l�i r� d \ �J�II_�, �\ / `^�� o \� °
p 1� I n a i ��/ \lam Y� J\ ` c�/ \ T� _ I/ �^ \ / \��' l �� o )- /��� I I <��` Q / ,��( ✓ �� q �j \ \� > I �� �� V_
01
/ l O L �� /I �/ �\ J �l ��\ c\ /\ / \ ✓ �� //�\ UT3 `�_ _
DO 1 1J — \ _ Imo) GJ l 1 y �— c� ) �\ —� %� jv S - ��~ J� I �.
° �� \ \> // \� <\ f�`J S��\ �, I ��` l`�� \ s ✓��� �� s�\ j �V ` (, \/ ^ /1J _.�.s. .-.-.-.-.-.-. .-.-.�L -�= .-P�. .� \)���� lllr� �� o�✓��� ` 3
\\ ~ �✓� �� L - = \s \� �� J J �/'� _ \ - I- - - �/ \�t,�- / - '✓ - - - - - - - - - / I I11a \� �a
\ 3 l I — - - = - - ? - - = I - - - - - -/-o - - - - J - - - - - ` `r-moi'--�O - - - - - - - -� - - r\\� - -I�-/✓ '- - - I- - - �� ' v ! / \\ \ 1 C \,—�
STA: 200+00 _ /�� � � \ / . � - �\ � �%�-/� - � _. -, � � r
\ -/- r - - - - -�- - - - - - - L\ F - . . - . - �! - - - - - - - - - - 07-h0 _ 208 - - - - - - - -
a /fes BEGIN UT3 -�-_� \- �` ��� %��\ -�-_ (� -^- 1^� 2 _ �s >< _ +00 1 0\
BEGIN HEADWATER RESTORATION . S: I�� = /- )� o - - ` j \ ^ - ` �r - - �'-� f�'/- -�I - - f- •206+00 - - - ✓ l - -\ - �--- - 209+0 - - - - 2 ° J �,1 I�� IIII 1) ✓ y 1 �� aL
_ _ ti
- -�- a
�> /- . . . . . . - - 04+00� 2_05+00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �Ox \�� ` ) \ \\/ a
-
o ' - _ �; _ — �. — < �/ tel. �.1 -� -�: .x — . v J /�
I o \ - - �-I - c -
_ _ l ( 1
v 00
z� ��'• `:" ...:... � � -�/ - = � 201+ - - - - = - � � � / �— � `��� �� � j^ - -/ �_ /--- - - - - � J.ry n S -Z - - -�- C�'— �r _ � 1 ^/� �/, r� �\ `-� \ \ )I I) J �1
° ;: > .�1 ,i r tip. ✓ \ \ (\� J\ c Z ✓-J > `� 1 d/ �� �\ �1� 1 /\ �� 1`� \ -
Q ° I j�,.�:• - - - - -JI- STA: 210+26 ) 1\(1 1 <��I �� l
END UT3 6 I � \\
1 / 4 1 / \ / T END HEADWATER RESTORATION--'
..::�� - - - -- (.� . \ - - - t =� - - / `� �' / ) ^\ L e s ) `, - UT1 STA: REACH02
_
V -V
J � . •.r• •_..f.. � \, - - - - - - - - - - - - - \— � - `f
vvvvv
CE—
xv
- t ` ✓ 1 ` ^� L ? CE _ IE CE a. p C�T� `�-�� ` �l / �° �� �� \ ��' ^ -
..��� I �\ �E CFo CE �/ > CE %� \ �� ) �' 1 v v r / 7� V - ` �� �� 1 / r� VAS / x�, i t
�\ \ C/�1 �J Lam\ �> J / l / 1— I/—�y� a �� l \ �,� ( \} J�V�� ��� �\
li ( �r
� o •:� � .� / � , , - •� 1 � %) `/(r J / ('� � J I 1 � i � \1 lJ o � S � � � � � � � 4 � ( �� � 1 �
'l \ , J/ Vow \ l 1 �' j j ✓ J i / i1 �� ✓��) ��✓^/��� S ti
40+00
I
�� L/ ✓/ �\ �t/`rte
U I-- t (l ���
0� -
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
O
z
a
LU
OO z
cho O
CIA
W I
� _j
N J
� O �
_ N
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Y
U
o
O
:2i
E
w
�o
o
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
�\
Q
(")m
Q
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
ZLLJ
_
J
0
U
Y O
U
W
�
S
(n
0
0
U
EXISTING
GR
DE
PROPOSED
GRADE
NOTE: THIS PROFILE IS FOR DESIGN AND REPRESENTATION OF BANKFULL
SLOPE AND TARGET HEAD OF RIFFLE AVERAGE SLOPE THROUGH THE
REACH. DETAIL SHOWING POOL DEPTHS, RIFFLE SLOPES, AND STRUCTURE
TARGET ELEVATIONS WILL BE ADDED IN THE DRAFT CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS. SEE SHEET 04 FOR TYPICAL PROFILE RIFFLE—POOL SEQUENCING.
�0 200+00 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00 208+50 209+00 209+50 210+00
U '
QE-
/ U
;p U
O
C �
N N
L
J c
/ o
� U
Q C
� L
°
Q
U E
a
°
6
-Q)
O u)
U O
� ami
C)
tip/ ( l �ry
\ \ L J ✓ v
Z) Q � I<<' -1 >v 1 \
v
52
48
44
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
210+50
r > \ \ s GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
o
30 s ( r ^ A 3030
a j rI \ \ I�> ����l�i r� d \ �J�II_�, �\ / `^�� o \� °
p 1� I n a i ��/ \lam Y� J\ ` c�/ \ T� _ I/ �^ \ / \��' l �� o )- /��� I I <��` Q / ,��( ✓ �� q �j \ \� > I �� �� V_
01
/ l O L �� /I �/ �\ J �l ��\ c\ /\ / \ ✓ �� //�\ UT3 `�_ _
DO 1 1J — \ _ Imo) GJ l 1 y �— c� ) �\ —� %� jv S - ��~ J� I �.
° �� \ \> // \� <\ f�`J S��\ �, I ��` l`�� \ s ✓��� �� s�\ j �V ` (, \/ ^ /1J _.�.s. .-.-.-.-.-.-. .-.-.�L -�= .-P�. .� \)���� lllr� �� o�✓��� ` 3
\\ ~ �✓� �� L - = \s \� �� J J �/'� _ \ - I- - - �/ \�t,�- / - '✓ - - - - - - - - - / I I11a \� �a
\ 3 l I — - - = - - ? - - = I - - - - - -/-o - - - - J - - - - - ` `r-moi'--�O - - - - - - - -� - - r\\� - -I�-/✓ '- - - I- - - �� ' v ! / \\ \ 1 C \,—�
STA: 200+00 _ /�� � � \ / . � - �\ � �%�-/� - � _. -, � � r
\ -/- r - - - - -�- - - - - - - L\ F - . . - . - �! - - - - - - - - - - 07-h0 _ 208 - - - - - - - -
a /fes BEGIN UT3 -�-_� \- �` ��� %��\ -�-_ (� -^- 1^� 2 _ �s >< _ +00 1 0\
BEGIN HEADWATER RESTORATION . S: I�� = /- )� o - - ` j \ ^ - ` �r - - �'-� f�'/- -�I - - f- •206+00 - - - ✓ l - -\ - �--- - 209+0 - - - - 2 ° J �,1 I�� IIII 1) ✓ y 1 �� aL
_ _ ti
- -�- a
�> /- . . . . . . - - 04+00� 2_05+00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �Ox \�� ` ) \ \\/ a
-
o ' - _ �; _ — �. — < �/ tel. �.1 -� -�: .x — . v J /�
I o \ - - �-I - c -
_ _ l ( 1
v 00
z� ��'• `:" ...:... � � -�/ - = � 201+ - - - - = - � � � / �— � `��� �� � j^ - -/ �_ /--- - - - - � J.ry n S -Z - - -�- C�'— �r _ � 1 ^/� �/, r� �\ `-� \ \ )I I) J �1
° ;: > .�1 ,i r tip. ✓ \ \ (\� J\ c Z ✓-J > `� 1 d/ �� �\ �1� 1 /\ �� 1`� \ -
Q ° I j�,.�:• - - - - -JI- STA: 210+26 ) 1\(1 1 <��I �� l
END UT3 6 I � \\
1 / 4 1 / \ / T END HEADWATER RESTORATION--'
..::�� - - - -- (.� . \ - - - t =� - - / `� �' / ) ^\ L e s ) `, - UT1 STA: REACH02
_
V -V
J � . •.r• •_..f.. � \, - - - - - - - - - - - - - \— � - `f
vvvvv
CE—
xv
- t ` ✓ 1 ` ^� L ? CE _ IE CE a. p C�T� `�-�� ` �l / �° �� �� \ ��' ^ -
..��� I �\ �E CFo CE �/ > CE %� \ �� ) �' 1 v v r / 7� V - ` �� �� 1 / r� VAS / x�, i t
�\ \ C/�1 �J Lam\ �> J / l / 1— I/—�y� a �� l \ �,� ( \} J�V�� ��� �\
li ( �r
� o •:� � .� / � , , - •� 1 � %) `/(r J / ('� � J I 1 � i � \1 lJ o � S � � � � � � � 4 � ( �� � 1 �
'l \ , J/ Vow \ l 1 �' j j ✓ J i / i1 �� ✓��) ��✓^/��� S ti
40+00
I
�� L/ ✓/ �\ �t/`rte
U I-- t (l ���
0� -
W
Q
U)
z
0
U)
W
O
z
a
LU
OO z
cho O
CIA
W I
� _j
N J
� O �
_ N
Ld N Y
c Z
P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
W
J
LL
0
L.L
M
0
Z Z)
Q
Z
Q
nJ
0
Z �
Q
(D Q
N W m o
Z Z LL
W Dpi
> Q ~ a -
Q Qw
2i (D
U Q
W �
C!)
SHEET NUMBER
13
Y
U
o
O
:2i
E
w
�o
o
wN
=
cn
0(_0
O
�\
Q
(")m
Q
>_
m
Ln
c) O
0
m
0
Q�
\
Z
ZLLJ
_
J
0
U
Y O
U
W
�
S
(n
0
0
U
W
J
LL
0
L.L
M
0
Z Z)
Q
Z
Q
nJ
0
Z �
Q
(D Q
N W m o
Z Z LL
W Dpi
> Q ~ a -
Q Qw
2i (D
U Q
W �
C!)
SHEET NUMBER
13

m
U W
O
V) Q
Q
U
C
0
T
N
Y
O
T
Cn
HEAD OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.) o
V5
TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.) w
3
INTERCHANGEABLE WITH LOG
CROSS VANE, LOG VANE, OR
LOG SILL PER PLANS. SEE
O
C - BED SEPARATE DETAIL
FLOW
00
co co
II I I\ 1� 1I\ �� I�i�=
1=1 I 1=1i 0iMi N = \ 0
0 I—� 1— 1-1 I __ _ _ _ _ _ —=1
11=11=11 o
—I I—� 1-1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1_ _1 I 1=1 I 1=1
Y — — — _ �""' oo
— O N =O
W
UN J
Q 1.0' DEEP WELL GRADED MIX
OF BRUSH AND NATURAL w N Y
CHANNEL MATERIAL z
° NOTES: o 0 ,
o
I >N% 0 1. PLACE FABRIC ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE [
MOST UPSTREAM LOG SILL IN THE CONSTRUCTED = _
3: RIFFLE. D
2. THE LOG SILLS SHALL ALL BE DESIGNED TO BE o
SUBMERGED OR COVERED AT LOW FLOWS. r-
< SECTION A -A 3. LOGS USED IN STRUCTURE FOR LOG SILLS SHALL o
W=3BE HARDWOOD SPECIES AND A MINIMUM OF 12"C] 0
"' z
IN DIAMETER. ■ 0
o 4. TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG IS INTERCHANGEABLE WITH
\ CLOG CROSS VANE, LOG VANE, OR LOG SILL PER
I PLANS. SEE SEPARATE DETAIL
� U
BANKFULL
1=
KEY/PRESS BRUSH INTO TOE OF BANK PRELIMINARY
-
o Q) TO PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION NOT FOR
OL 1=1 1=1 1=1 1= -0.5% SLOPE \ _ _11-1CONSTRUCTION
o SECTION B -B TAIL OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP)
co
Q INTERCHANGEABLE WITH LOG CROSS
HEAD OF RIFFLE LOG (TYP.)
VANE, LOG VANE, OR LOG SILL PER
WELL GRADED MIX OF BRUSH PLANS. SEE SEPARATE DETAIL
Q AND NATURAL CHANNEL
Q MATERIAL
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION WHERE
3 \ NORMAL WATER MEETS THE
BANKS
U
T \ B; \
0
BANKFULL BANKFULL
Q0 { z = Y a_
Ln / co 3 C g
Y
o EDGE OF WATER \ i''" i - = ,�, EDGE OF WATER w O O o o
A \ LLJ
\POOL\ ' "" �' �\ POOL A � 0O \ m m m
FLOW \ r _ FLOW= 0
O O (-)o o
POOL \ \ EXCAVATED POOL, TYP.
Q�
o EDGE OF WATER=_�\ EDGE OF WATER J
BANKFULL _ ` BANKFULL Q
cc Q)
B
C \ SEE PROFILE FOR \ W
N \ O SPACING BETWEEN STEPS Q
KEY INTO BANK
N PLAN VIEW MINIMUM OF 5.0'
Qo Q
�C w
Q)
CO
W C
U
Q V)
W
C
o C z
Q
01 Z
C�
Q
CV W m Q�
N
CIO) 0
C BRUSH AND RLL
OLL RIFFLE z z °
Q) w
u� 1 w00L
Not to Scale > z Q
°0 Q w
�� Q Q
U
C
N
U Q �
w
CL
a U
U
c�
�c
Y �
mE-
SHEET NUMBER
O
ON4o�
a

m
U W
O
V
V) Q
Q
D
U
C
0
T
N
Y
O
NAIL FABRIC TO LOG cn
z
O
U)
° TOE OF SLOPE FLOW SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION w
3�
U
12" BRUSH
°
% BED °
co
Q \� �� BACKFILL (TYP) z
0 0 \ 1. 0, 1' MIN. EXCAVATED POOL
O SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR DEPTH
0
E O
U
Y p z
0 chO
_
Li
o
COMPACTED BRUSH LAYER AND U) NLij
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL LAYER.
co y
Li N
ALL BRUSH PLACED PERPENDICULAR z
° TO THE CHANNEL. /\
SECTION A—A z w
a O � r�
0 SECTION A—A
Q�
Q,0
3 C U
on o
u
FLOW 6IG RUN N
o - SLOPE 20%N TRIgUT ARIES zo
j — = SLOPE A%
STREAM BED ����� \ \ \ \ LOGS MAY BE NOTCHED TO
PROVIDE A BETTER FIT AND
LOCK TOGETHER IF NECESSARY
i BRUSH AND
N o BACKFILL
Of Of
> BRUSH LAYER w w Y
° END OF LOG BURRIED < < m PRELIMINARY
INTO STREAM BED 3-4'
Q Q o 0 o NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
�
E o
o NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL
Cn ° SECTION B—B
Q)`o
° ro --A
I co
CL �� i G A
0
°0-\�G O NMINIMUM
J� -\0 BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX OF \ \ \ \
Q roo ZG r� BRUSH AND ON—SITE MATERIAL 2 0° \\ \\ \\ KEY INTO BANK A
\ \ \ OF 5.0
N-
-C j
� 3
O
O
%�
W
O Y :2iE
00 0J
�
Q I� o0��m m m
U) /Ln
° A O w
w
0-)__j° ✓ Y0 O Q (n Q w
Y ° � Q Q U
U
N '
E N
0 Cl)0
,q J
C I
O 0
cc Q)
O 0 BRUSH LAYER A
N BELOW LOG W
°
PLAN VIEW
Q) co
QQ
o
u�C W
Q)
C
<C
WC
QV)
W°
C PLAN VIEW
Ln _C:
o
�co
coQ
CO Q
LOG VANE LOG SILL N W m a.)
_0 Not to Scale 3 Not to Scale z LL
O
° W0
Z
�Q
0 L
Q)° �~a
Q
U
Q Q w v
u U wCL
�C
c�
Y Q)
m
° SHEET NUMBER
°
Q)
-N5
o�
a

m
U W
O
V
V) Q
Q
D
U
C
0
T
N
Y
O
T
LOG VANE BANKFULL ELEVATION INNER BERM ELEVATION z
(SEE PLAN, PROFILE, AND TYPICAL SECTIONS) O
Cn
cRoss Loc COIR FABRIC (TYP) NOTE: IF TYPICAL SECTION DOES NOT CALL FOR INNER BERM, �
FLOW SEE DETAIL BRUSH AND FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AND
COMPACTED TO THE BANKFULL ELEVATION.
..
SEE PLAN MATCH TYPICAL DIMENSIONS
U C=
° \\
\ BED NON -WOVEN rr 6" MAX ABOVE "BASE FLOW" z
Q L
o GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
C BACKFILL (TYP) N EXCAVATED POOL,
° SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR DEPTH v STREAM GRADING
— PER PLAN
2.0' COMPACTED BRUSH, SEE BACKFILL DETAIL :E
o
E BASE/NORMAL FLOW ELEVATION
Y O Z
SECTION A -A 0
Q 18" MIN. EXCAVATED POOL PER PROFILE o
BRUSH LAID PERPENDICULAR TO THE N -
c
° STREAM BED AND COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS. ^ Li "'
Li
-cc
U
CL
0
a p r�
N O
SEC110N A -A J
Q
Qi U O r7
U O
un C/) O
J•- �
Q O O
N W
w o Z
O
0 3z
U
� E
m
cn cn o 0
CO m
I0v
N NOTES: 13' MIN. FROM EDG om
N 1. DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE VANE ARM TIES INTO THE BANK.
> 0 2. BRUSH AND STICKS TO BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS BETWEEN LOGS. D
° .0U -6 3. ALL LOGS TO BE HARDWOOD SPECIES, 8" DIAMETER. m PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
<o A
CONSTRUCTION
NE
O
Q)C
Cn°
N O
Q) POOL PER PROFILE
c
CL
°
oW Ld
0 J „r
Q J � � �
U) O LL_
cn LL.
3z o O Q BRUSH PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO
m W m
w FLOW
° O A
NAIL LOGS TOGETHER
z = y a_
0 p i SEE PLAN VPEW FOR o
o USING 9" GALVANIZED NAIL A EXTENTS OF TOE1N ~ ? o Y C) o
r
o ° �' ARM 0� w o O =
° LENGTH -D o cn
LLJ
��� (L) i��� mO Q\ m m m
.n o L o o Q o m o
\ \ G
0, JO 3�a << f'�/ / z o �LLJ
U
W
O 0 i0
Oce BACKFILL WITH BRUSH, STICKS, /
° 75% BRUSH (STICKS/LEAVES/BRANCHES)
AND ON—SITE ALLUVIUM, (TYP.)
o ° 25% ON—SITE EARTH MATERIAL
7 J
CROSS LOG 3 BANKFULL
o 0
U
�O
N0N° LOG VANE
�
o °
1.0
W °
\\ P 0L
g PLAN VIEW
00
co 0000 �d'O NOTE:
° OC 00 1. BRUSH SHALL BE A VARIETY OF DIAMETERS AND SHALL
A BE LAID GENERALLY PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AND W
COMPACTED BY DIRT.
Q 2. FIRST LAYER OF BRUSH SHALL BE A BED OF 3"
o POOL EXCAVATED PER PROFILE LIMBS/BRUSH SET 18" MIN. BELOW THE BED.
° OR DIRECTION OF ENGINEER 3. LAYERS ABOVE 1st LAYER SHALL BE 75% BRUSH OF A
VARIETY OF SIZES WITH 25% ON SITE MATERIAL FILLING
Q VOIDS.
4. BRUSH BROUGHT UP IN LIFTS.
HE BRUSH T
PLAN VIEW 5. GRADING ABOVE
SECTION AND/ORTGRAD NG PLAN.
PER THE TYPICAL
0
0Zo �
°NQJ�
cry
(D Q
-U) LOG CROSS VANE u 4 C BRUSH TOE PROTECTION N w m v
� _0ct
U C Not to Scale `� Not to Scale Z o
° W 0 Z
�Q
0 L
�° �~a
Q
U
Q Q w v
C U w
a 0
W
Y Q)
m
° SHEET NUMBER
O
N 16 o �
a ~

m
U W
O
V
V) Q
Q
D
U
C
0
T
N
Y
O
T
Cn
O Z
O
O
W
3
U
0
V)
U
C
ui NEW STREAMBANK 5'
SHALL BE TREATED UNCOMPACTED
o AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS BACKFILL o
Vco
z
FLOW
C
w
o —
T
COMPACTED
U
E
BACKFILL
L
Y
O Z
O �
COMPACTED O N
BACKFILL
LJ
SECTION A—A N
SEC110N B—B CO y
CO
U W N
C Z
C
U
C LLJ
0
a 0 r�
N >- O
I >N% Of
o <
Q �
0 = _
pi U
U O
un C/) O
W •- O �
Q O
N W
W o Z
O
O
0 3z a_
U
E
� U
cn U
cn O
C �
C)N
a -C F�
N o
> P THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
° ° P]R]E]LIMINA]RY
o NOT FOR
o CONSTRUCTION
N E
O
C
M U
D w
Q o
c
co
m
CL 3' MIN.
LENGTH
0 0
� a
U N
C Q
N O
cn
3 NOTES:
1. BOTTOM OF BLOCK SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 1' BELOW THE INVERT
OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL.
2. COMPACT BACKFILL IN 12" LIFTS TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE DIRECTION OF z = y a_
o EXISTINI GBACKFLL P THE ENGINEER. o Y C) o
o CHANNEL w 0 0 =
/ U —D O N m
o O C Q 0 m p
LLJ
EXTEND CHANNEL BLOCK �" �� _J
MIN. OF 6" BEYOND LIMITS Y O O U W � =
Y OF EXISTING CHANNEL Cf) o o 0
Q PLAN VIEW
co
Q�
T
J
O C
0
O U
N �
_U
Lu
N �
0
Q
LN
N rn
N
O
C Lu
N
cn E
W -3
Q �
W •C
D C
U
Q
W O
C
cn
6
CHANNELBLOCK
o
Not to Scale z
0 O
�...,
C)N
J Q)Q
�
c�
(D Q
Q N w m v
N
�C z azo
U
w oow
z �
� > Q
uQ
Q QQw
U
C
� OU �
N
� V
U Q
u� w
CL
Qo
c�
�C
Y Q)
m
SHEET NUMBER
O
Q) -0
0N
�
a ~

(3
C
N
_O
U
O
V)
V)
Q
C
U
C
O
S
T
N
Y
O
T
U
U
O
t
3
0
-C
V)
U
C
N
_U
U
O
Q
a
U
O
T
E
Y
T
C
O
0
Q
0
a
C)
o
N
J N
Q O
C
M
o
C)-
"
9 E
C U
U O
N
C
U
Q
J 0
/ U
N U
c01L
�0
Q
a�
U
0 16 0
U N
C V)
cn �)
U U
Q
T
Q
u
3
9
n -C
\ U
Y o
1
JI �
J U
C
U
Q)
U)
E 0
Q
a
a
U
Q
DO
o
T
C
O
N N
Q �
E
�C
a
U
% >
J �
�N
JC
Y �
Z �
_C
J •
Z U
V)
n 0
Y C
� 0
0
� 0
C
O C
T O
U N
J �
Q
9 C
V 0)
Q)
> -0
�a
J C
U
nQ
U U
N C
U
t
N �
d +'
N
C C
Y N
>, E
U
UO
N -0
o�
i -
I
POOL
RIFFLE
RIFFLE
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH
LIVE STAKING, PERMANENT AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING PER PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
STREAM BED
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
BACKFILL
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN)
Q::POOL::D
18" (TYP.)
PLAN
6" MIN
KEY INTO STREAMBED
(PER TYPICAL
CROSS—SECTION BELOW)
POOL
RIFFLE
RIFFLE
FLOODPLAIN/EXISTING
GROUND
ANCHORS ON 1'
CENTERS IN TRENCH
MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
TRENCH AND BACKFILLED
EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE
OF SLOPE AND KEY INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 6"
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
MATTING I
TRENCH
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN)
SEED AND MULCH PER VEGETATION
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
NEW CHANNEL
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED TO EDGE OF CUT/FILL
PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH LIVE
STAKING, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SEEDING PER
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
NATURAL CHANNEL BOTTOM
SECTION (NO MATTING)
NOTES:
1. IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL
SEEDING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND
SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
ANCHOR TRENCH
PLAN VIEW
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR EROSION CONTROL MATTING
Not to Scale
2" X 2" (NOMINAL)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
N
N N
ANCHOR
ANCHORS ON 3' CENTERS
ANCHORS (TYP)
3 ON 1'
I.CIV 1 CF"NS AT
STREAMBED
W
Q
Cn
z
O
Cn
W
O
z
LU
0 z
OCIA �
0 0
w
:DN J
C/)o �
N
Ld N
C z
0
o
Q
o
Cn 0
6' MAX. W/O WIRE STEEL POST 0
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER N z
o
SILT FENCE _
a_GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TO SECOND 3'—O" z
WIRE FROM TOP 8"_24
GRADE - o
GRADE
— P]R]E]LIlVIINA]R�
FABRIC 8" DOWN AND 4"I Iryi8"MIN. COVER NOT FOR
FORWARD ALONG TRENCH 2'— 0 OVER SKIRT* CONSTRUCTION
ANCHOR SKIRT AS
-
I 1 F I DIRECTED BY ENGINEER*
FRONT VIEW
* FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES, USE No. 57 STONE
FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH BASIN.
SIDE VIEW
NOTES:
1. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN
DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER
IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED
FLOW.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS
TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
Not to Scale
0
Z
OJ
U Q
Z
Ow
W
0
O
Lu
0
Z
r ^
N w m o
Z z O
w p �
QQ ~ a
Q w
U Q F
Nw —
LL
W
SHEET NUMBER
18
Y
U
O
-
O
E
w
O
O
N
=
(n
0O
Q
Q
m
m
m
Ln
o 0
om
o
Q �
\
z
z
`'
_
J
(�
U
Y O
UW
�
S
Cn
Q
Q
U
0
Z
OJ
U Q
Z
Ow
W
0
O
Lu
0
Z
r ^
N w m o
Z z O
w p �
QQ ~ a
Q w
U Q F
Nw —
LL
W
SHEET NUMBER
18

U
C
N
O
U
O
O
O
Q
O
U
O
S
T
Y
O
T
O
O
U
U
O
O
Q
a
0
Y
0
a
3 0
J N
< O
C)
_
o
Cl
/
� U
� O
> O
N
S
�o
J o
Q
Q
�o
Q
Qa
0 0
0
_
Q
C)
9
n
\ U
Y o
Z
J
J �
U
U)
Q �
,Q
U
'7 U
o
T
o
Q-
U
J �
Q
S O
S
Y �
7 �
J
Z °
n °
Y �
_
o
T�
C
Q
9
Q)
>
�a
J�
J�Q
� U
0
S U
N
C�
U_ 3
Q N
N �
C- O
Q
N
Y N
T
U
O
N �
V)
o�
i ~
A
4 X (D)
PLAN
A
—f
SECTION A -A
ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP—AROUND HOSE
OF CLEAN WATER) Not to Scale
EXISTING TERRAIN
FILTER FABRIC
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
15.0 FT. TO 20.0 FT.
457 STONE
STREAM BANK
NOTE: IF SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IS PLACED ON DISTURBED SOIL THEN A STABILIZED
OUTLET/CHANNEL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL CONSIST OF A 1"-6" WELL GRADED MIX OF RIP RAP A
MINIMUM OF 1' THICK PER THE DIMENSIONS BELOW. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN
THE RIP RAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION. THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL EXTEND FROM THE
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN TO THE BANK OF THE CHANNEL BELOW THE WORK AREA.
FILTER FABRIC
3.0 FEET _�
EXISTING
GROUND
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN WITH ROCK PAD
Not to Scale
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN, UTILIZE A
STABILIZED OUTLET INSTEAD OF A
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IF PUMPING
CLEAN WATER. (SEE NOTES)
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE
EDGE OF FLOODPLAIN
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
FLOW
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
DEWATERING PUMP
PUMP—AROUND PUMP
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA WHEN WORKING "IN CHANNEL"
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR
HOSE/PIPE OUTLET.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS.
DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE
EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. PUMP AROUND AREA TO BE STABILIZED WITH MATTING AT THE END OF EACH
WORK DAY. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET
ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM
SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE
LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAY'S WORK. ALL
GRADING MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF THE DAY.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND OUTLET CHANNEL AND THEN
BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA PER THE PLANS AND SPECS.
NOTES
1) ALL IN —STREAM EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED
SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2) IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM
STREAM FLOW.
3) GRADED STREAM BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED, WITH MATTING,
PRIOR TO PREDICTED RAIN FALL EVENTS, UNLESS ALL RAIN
EVENT FLOW CAN BE PUMPED AROUND FOR PREDICTED EVENT.
4) MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
5) PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER
THE WORK AREA.
WORK AREA
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
NOTE:
PUMP—AROUND OPERATION MAY
NOT BE REQUIRED IF NO BASE
FLOW
EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
Not to Scale
m
W
Q
z
O
Cn
W
O
z
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
0
Z (f
OJ
U Q
Z
Ow
W
0
0.
Lu
0
Z
Q
(D Q
N w pp o
Z 3:z O
w0�
p
Q~<
Q Q ^^w
1
U Q
NW �
LL
W
SHEET NUMBER
19
00
o
o
0
—
w
�O0
O
WN
=
cn
CD
O
\
Q
U�
Q
m
m
O
W
m
Q
Q
\
Z
Z
W
= —
0)
J
U
U
O
O
U
W
<
_
U)
C,
C,
U
0
Z (f
OJ
U Q
Z
Ow
W
0
0.
Lu
0
Z
Q
(D Q
N w pp o
Z 3:z O
w0�
p
Q~<
Q Q ^^w
1
U Q
NW �
LL
W
SHEET NUMBER
19

m
U W
O
V) Q
Q
°
MULCH AND MAINTENANCE
MULCH
APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING, WITH BIODEGRADABLE
NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT
Y CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
MAINTENANCE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH z
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE PER SECTION 1.8 OF SCDHEC O
BMP HANDBOOK FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL. cn
w
75 m
°
GENERAL NOTES
1) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A MINIMUM OF 5"), TOP SOIL
ADDED, AMENDED WITH FERTILIZER, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY), STRAWED, o
Q AND THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING (C700 OR APPROVED z
3 EQUIVALENT) PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. ONCE THE MATTING IS
DOWN INSTALL THE LIVE STAKES THROUGH THE MATTING.
J=
Q 2) O.C. = ON—CENTER �
Ll 0
Ll 3) IF DROUGHT CONDITIONS EXIST THE CONTRACTOR WILL WATER THE INSTALLED
o Y VEGETATION WITH WATER FROM THE CREEK TO ENSURE 85% SURVIVAL AT THE END o
z T OF THE 1—YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. O
z
W
0 mr � N W
J
O a O
0
Z p W N
Q ° �\ �z�
W U LJ
z
> ° o
Ln
0 0 <
o cull = v
� � I
O
(n O
3 O
O
N W
Clo z
■\��� o
N i
/ U
0 O
D �
Q
C
/�
N
O o
Q) Q)
U
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
o LIVE STAKES ARE 1/2" TO 2" IN DIAMETER AND V-3' IN LENGTH. CONSTRUCTION
Q
o —
� a
V U
C O
N O
� N
N
U N
L
N �
T N
N i
O
O °
Ln
°
O 3
� U
JI ZONE ZONE
3 2
VARIES �II� VARIESSl� o o
U p 80b� a s 0�� o�� oo� w O O=
119, o a O N U>
LLJ
a° D� ' �°J°q� ��� DO " p° 00 00 0� �� o� a a �° ° ° 0 °A° O° ° p 0 ( U) m
N 0 $ p 8�� D o o W o 0 p0 0 a o W o $ D' (� � 0 Q Q M
W
�' o p D Do w v o v w v Q L O o m o
o o = \ LLJ
W O Z Y
Y 0 0O Q v� Q w
o o w _
INSTALL WOVEN COIR FIBER MAT 1/2" — 2" U) o 0 0
00
Q OVER SEED OR SOD
FLAT TOP END
N ESTABLISHED PLANT SHOWN
o �Q} FOR INFORMATION ONLY J w
GROUND
o
SECTION VIEW(HEADWATER RESTORATION) — BUFFER AND WETLAND PLANTING INSTALL SPLIT 2" X 2" X 12" LATERAL BUD q SURFACE z J
DEAD STOUT STAKES PER SPECIFICATIONS =
NOT TO SCALE //ii//� I ii
�� � z �
� U)
Q BARK RIDGE O w
U
PLANTING TO TOP
SIDE BRANCH
co
z OF RIP RAP (TYP) REMOVED N Q Q
Q ZONE L u
� � J
W� 1 z
o VARIES �� w Q
z U) 30" LIVE CUTTING (DORMANT) EXISTING o �n
o ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE GROUND NOTES. V V
Q° 3 2 2 3 c: /� 1. IF USING WOVEN COIR FIBER w
W VARIES �I� VARIES — VARIES VARIES ti0 MAT, _ >
TF' MULCHNBENEATHO MAT.TRAW
CD
00.
> ° b�c�aa ao D °° a °° ° 2 WATERLOW SEASONAL
o p �� pa ��� $ ° ° 8 ��� o��� ��a 2. 3 ON CENTERS Q
b� baa a �a
45' TAPER BUTT END BELOW
LAST REMOVED BRANCH
J Q i
LIVE STAKE DETAIL J
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH) N0 0 SCALEco z
N ° NOT TO SCALE T T CV W a (r QJ
>� z�mo
a z
° w o
0 Lu
z
Q~aU
u SECTION VIEW (RESTORATION) — BUFFER AND WETLAND PLANTING Q Q L v
� U
S L
N
�, NOT TO SCALE
u 3 1
U
N ol
N c
Q 0
O
N
O +
Y �
T
m SHEET NUMBER
U O
0
20
a
RIPARIAN SEED MIX
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
PERCENT PLANTED
REDTOP PANICGRASS
PANICUM RIGIDULUM
30
BEAKED PANICGRASS
PANICUM ANCEPS
25.9
GREENWHITE SEDGE
CAREX ALBOLUTESCENS
13
RIVERBANK WILDRYE
ELYMUS RIPARIUS
10
HOP SEDGE
CAREX LUPULINA
5
GLOBE BEAKSEDGE
RHYNCHOSPORA GLOBULARIS
9
CRIMSONEYED ROSEMALLOW
HIBISCUS MOSCHEUTOS
2
SOFT RUSH
JUNCUS EFFUSUS
2
LIZARD'S TAIL
SAURURUS CERNUUS
2
JOE PYE WEED
EUPATORIUM FISTULOSUM
1
PURPLEHEAD SNEEZEWEED
HELENIUM FLEXUOSUM
1
PATH RUSH
JUNCUS TENUIS
1
WOOLGRASS
SCIRPUS CYPERINUS
1
NEW YORK IRONWEED
VERNONIA NOVEBORACENSIS
1
SOUTHERN WAXY SEDGE
CAREX GLAUCESCENS
0.5
NARROWLEAF PRIMROSE
WILLOW
LUDWIGIA LINEARIS
0.3
SEASIDE PRIMROSE WILLOW
LUDWIGIA MARITIMA
0.3
STREAM BANK (ZONE 1) LIVESTAKE PLANTING
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
WETLAND INDICATOR
STATUS
SILKY DOGWOOD
CORNUS AMOMUM
FACW
BLACK WILLOW
SALIX NIGRA
OBL
COTTONWOOD
POPULUS DELTOIDES
FACW
BUTTONBUSH
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
OBL
ZONE 2 — UPLAND PLANTING
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
WETLAND INDICATOR
STATUS
PERCENT PLANTED
CHERRYBARK OAK
QUERCUS PAGODA
FACW
20
SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
20
GREEN ASH
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
FACW
20
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FACW
20
BLACK GUM
NYSSA SYLVATICA
FAC
20
ZONE 3 — WETLAND PLANTING
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
WETLAND INDICATOR
STATUS
PERCENT PLANTED
BALD CYPRESS
TAXODIUM DISTRICHUM
OBL
16
BLACK GUM
NYSSA BIFLORA
OBL
16
WATER TUPELO
NYSSA AQUATIC
OBL
16
CHERRYBARK OAK
QUERCUS PAGODA
FACW
16
SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
16
GREEN ASH
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
FACW
16

Appendix G
NCSAM Forms
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Weyerhaeuser - C26 - UT1
Stream Category la3
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Ratin
Date of Evaluation June 14, 2017
Assessor Name/Organization J. Hartshorn/Kimley-Horn
YES
YES
YES
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2)Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
LOW

Appendix H
Wetland and Stream Data Forms
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: �-
Project/Site: CY,��Gw 2�
Latitude:
Evaluator: ���� 1L
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Det mination (' cle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera Intermittent P ennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or perennial if a 30
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
-Absent
Weak ''_
Moderate
Strong Score ;
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
-
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 r Yes =
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple
pool sequence
0
1 1.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
401
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
=
Yes = 3
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12.
Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2
14.
Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
1
15.
Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 r Yes =
C. Biology Subtotal = k
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1 0
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance)
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1 1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 1.5
25. Algae
0 0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1
; Other - So'
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
1
BKFW: 7
BKFD: L'
WW: T
WD: to
Substrate:
Clarity:
Flow: �

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: �1 ��
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:0
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c rcle ori
her
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
e. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if? 30
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = IS
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong. Score
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple
pool sequence
0
%..'
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
11.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =-0
ek-3
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 115
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
927 1 2
14.
Leaf litter
0:$ 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0. 1 1.5 -
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5 1 1"
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No= 0 Yes= TT i
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae CV
1 0.5
1
1.5
t
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
; Other =
P>
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
r
I BKFW: I
BKFD:�
WW:
WD: >?
Substrate:
Clarity:��
Flow:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: CXAj� Sampling Date: (�
ApplicantlOwner: t� State: —. X — Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): t Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No=,
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) \
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No within a Wetland? Yes a No E]
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (BI 5) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No'`
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
E2
Saturation Present? Yes No
. Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No ,l
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
F
�'
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
50% of total cover:
SaDling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: b )
1. I0:� Y �
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: _ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species rr��/
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I(�l / art) (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FRC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (2 )
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�i 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2�•/a 20% of total cover: 1,0 `1ro
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �� )
1. -- FOAL
2.
3,
4.
5.
14 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7 Ph? 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes 4Q No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tyoe Loc
Texture Remarks
t.
V
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (38) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (AIO) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFI2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (FIO) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (36)
Lj
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
THydriSll
Depth (inches):
Present? Yes No—t
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Z p
Project/Site: (,tit_&L Z to, City/County: GfANf0 Sampling Date: 31 O
Applicant/Owner: 1 �'�LVY�'� State: K)L Sampling Point: WZ�GaJ
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): rt) l [' Gt�4_0L Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No=
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No F
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primate Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (613)
-High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron 'Cl)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
2SQGeomorphic
Position (132)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes NoDepth
Water Table Present? Yes No
(r
(inches):
Depth (inches): V C &
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): C✓WTQA,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes> :l NoF-1
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: J6
CL
�uvv�vw n, v (Cxa,,
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 12(3 )
1. t1 �Iti1.
2.
3-
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 11-00 )
1. Gtkt:�
[ o ) S 10 N_ DIR ,
tXH
3. �' 11 (CAn_l- �
-4 �ftti
4. 6 rao _ I o L
5. N
6.
7.-
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
'lo= Total Cover
50% of total cover: '0A 20% of total cover: 1 °
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: `�C, )
1. 76 _ K
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:° 0 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
(A)
q (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
17(_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytio
Vegetation
Present? Yes 2 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile
e to the depth
Sampling Point:
r or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color moist % Tyoe Loc
q6 If
to Yr- 160
tL— { ro yG
'Type: C=Concentration D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Sail Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (36)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
trictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Texture Remarks
C CL N
t�A �
1d
5 -
2 PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 15311)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -a No
lil-
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:� rr� City/County: ���K� Sampling Dale: 3 v
Applicant/Owner: G✓r State: NC– Sampling Point: Jam✓
Investigators) * t ,, Section, Township, Range: W7,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): 5 WQ.Local relief (concave, convex, none): C(71(1 CQV e Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
Lat:
Long:
NWI classification:
Datum:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil "XI , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are VegetationSofl or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �_ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_u Surface Water (Al) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
�C Drift Deposits (133) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
u Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (135) — Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (03)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes! No Depth (inches):
i,
Water Table Present? Yes t< No Depth (inches): c5
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Y �✓ J
k
� 11�L 1 V J)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
t
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 P D (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sa lin /Shr b Stratum (Plot size: 301
)
2.
FAC species
3.
FACU species
4.
UPL species
5.
Column Totals:
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
e
1. •% 20% of total cover: �p
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2. . Z
tj_ niR,
3. ��, r,
/
�6_U C,
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10,
11.
12.
QU%= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
D 20% of total cover: - 1W,
Woody Vine Stratua (Phot size: 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
'6 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Z °% 20% of total cover: _L�/b
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 P D (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of,
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
�(�J✓
. y
y
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features (_j
(inches) Color (moist) % /
t~lYL -J,
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
bb (�
C
� - L\ 10 1- 3 \�L'l .
\�_ M1 )UL b i /, Ci JN_
`ISL
U%- c 1
z.sry►
12 SC M
-'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
` Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ^ Red Parent Material (TF2)
— Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? YeI/ No
Remarks:
_s,�e��
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

Appendix I
Conservation Easement Documents
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
day of , 201_ by and between_
("Grantor") and ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties,
their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and
being in County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d)
listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real

property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational,
or open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following
natural communities: add or delete as appropriate: wetlands, streams and riparian
buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands
and riparian resources and other natural values of approximately acres, more or
less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement Area"), and
prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any purpose
or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument
(MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the
Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW -
the
Mitigation Bank in the
Mitigation Bank, Department of the
entitled "Agreement to Establish
River Basin within the State of
North Carolina", entered into by and between acting as the Bank Sponsor
and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Mitigation Site has been
approved by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable
stream and wetland impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement
shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to
include any successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate
enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and
do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument
number SAW- ("Mitigation Banking Instrument"), or any permit or
certification issued by the Third -Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby
unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors
and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area
described on Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation
values thereof, as follows:

ARTICLE I.
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is
an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor,
Grantor's personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and
licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with
the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation
Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any
development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and
uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any
introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building,
mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising
display,_antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other
temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Conservation
Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are
prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming,
cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement
Area except as provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous
vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved
in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five consecutive years
from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed
by and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways
on the Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing

roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement
Area, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation
values of the Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules
and regulations for the use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying
the Grantor as owner of the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage,
waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or
hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or
other materials on the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any
manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or
drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands
within the Conservation Easement Area, is allowed to perform grading,
filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by
Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or
altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or
alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition,
diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is
prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered
or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a
transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or
otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by the Enter Sponsor Name, the Grantee, its
employees and agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of
constructing, maintaining and monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area..
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation
Easement Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant,
the preservation of the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural

condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area
for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not
limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights
of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement
Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement
Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to
the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and
preservation of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation
Easement Area in accordance with the approved Mitigation Plan, and the
Mitigation Banking Instrument described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the
Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all
reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to
determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns,
is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantee, Enter Sponsor Name, and its authorized representatives,
successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon the
Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational
observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENTAND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are
allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is
inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such
areas or features of the Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by
Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the
Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains
uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by

appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without
notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if
the breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances
damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate.
The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection
with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration,
including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid by
Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps
shall have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and
conditions of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision
hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition,
or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of
a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to
entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except
Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor
under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life,
damage to property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such
causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the
Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which
may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no
outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property
which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor
further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons._
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any
interest in all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to
provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the
transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement
shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation

Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or
terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this
Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the
Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this
Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified
holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3)
and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and
agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or
assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes
described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI
with corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the
entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and
supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to
the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property
free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except
those incurred after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the
Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any
kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the
Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor
of the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits
that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated
with fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These
activities include the maintenance and/or replacement of fence structures, as deemed
necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the
boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, byjudicial
proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area
is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the
Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in
appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking,
and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation
Easement Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an
extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair
market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time of the
extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication
required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter
specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Grantee:
[Name, address and fax number]
To Sponsor:
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to
make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's
interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an
appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in
a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not
affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee
under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this
grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation
Easement Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section
of the Mitigation Plan,_prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor
and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and
Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any
future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with
the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to
preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the

Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for
the aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
[Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form]

Appendix J
Performance Bond
The Middle Neuse Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank I Craven 26 Site Mitigation Plan — DRAFT
September 2018 1

Bond No.
Maintenance and Monitoring
Performance Bond
Penal Sum: $
Know All Men By These Presents,
That we, [name] of [address] (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and [bonding
company] with an office at [address], a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of
[state] (hereinafter called the "Surety'), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, (hereinafter called the "USACE") and the [name
and address of party that will receive the funds in the event of default], (hereinafter called
the "Obligee"), up to the maximum penal sum of [amount] Dollars ($ amount) (hereinafter
called the "Maximum Penal Sum"), for the payment of which we, the Principal and the Surety,
bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into the • •• • ••••• • • • • •• ••• • • "0000 000000000
• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Mitigation Banking Instrument (hereinafter called the "MBP') with the USACE, dated the
••••••*edayof••••••••••I*•••••••••••,-wlrieh•inchmesthe Final Mitigation Plan for the
[name of mitigation site] (the "IMP") to ensure that aquatic resources within the boundaries of
the mitigation site will be [enter appropriate activities (ex. restored, enhanced, monitored).]
WHEREAS, the principal promised to deliver to the USACE and the Obligee a Bond substantially
in the form hereto upon completion and compliance with construction and other criteria of the
LIMBI, IMP, and permits.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that this Bond will
not be released in whole or in part until the Principal receives written verification from the
USACE that the conditions for release in the IMP have been fully met. If the above bounden
Principal shall meet the final performance standards as defined in the IMP, then this obligation
shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. This bond is subject to
the following conditions:
1)•• This bond shall remain in full force and effect for a period of [number] years. [If the•bond
will be reduced on an annual basis, include the following statement and fill in the -columns
below.] The Maximum Penal Sum of this bond may be reduced by the USACE, by -these
scheduled amounts:
Year Reduction Revised Penal Sum
1 $ $
2 $ $
3 $ $
4 $ $
5 $ $
6 $ $
7 $ $
2) USACE shall issue a full and final release of this Bond when the [enter event. Ex:

construction activities are complete and/or seven year monitoring period is complete; all
monitoring reports have been submitted and have been approved by the USACE; and the
success criteria identified in the FMP have been achieved and approved by the USACE.]
This Bond shall not be released in whole until the Principal receives written verification from the
USACE that all the conditions for release have been satisfied.
3) If any payment under this Bond, as set forth in subsection 4 (b) below, is made, then the
outstanding penal sum of the Bond shall be reduced by the corresponding amount of such
payment. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the aggregate liability of
the Surety is limited to the Maximum Penal Sum stated above, regardless of the number or
amount of claims brought against this bond and regardless of the number of years this bond
remains in effect. The USACE shall issue a full and final release of this Bond and any and all of
Surety's obligations hereunder when Surety has tendered payment in whole, or in parts equal to
the aggregate sum, of the Maximum Penal Sum of this Bond.
4) The Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after the USACE has notified the
Principal of their failure to abide by, or cure default conditions related to, the terms and
conditions of the IMP. Upon notice of the Principal's default under the IMP, the Surety, in its
sole discretion and notwithstanding any of the provisions of the above, shall remedy the
Principal's default by taking action under 4) a) or 4) b) below. In the event that the Surety either
fails to respond to USACE's notice of default within thirty (30) business days of receipt of said
notice, or fails to honor Surety's commitments under this bond to the full satisfaction of the
USACE, then Surety shall remedy such default in accordance with subsection 4) c) below:
a) Remedy the default of the Principal to the full satisfaction of the USACE by a
reasonable date determined by the USACE; or
b) Immediately tender to the Obligee, that portion of the Maximum Penal Sum that the
Obligee determines, in their discretion, is due and owing and necessary to remedy the
default. If payment is tendered to the Obligee under this subsection, the Obligee shall
immediately become a Surety or Sureties to this Bond, or
c) In the event that the Surety fails to respond within thirty (30) business days to the
USACE's notice of default, or to honor commitments to the full satisfaction of the
USACE under paragraph a) or b) of this section within a reasonable time to be
determined by the USACE, the remaining portion of the Maximum Penal Sum may, at
the election of the Obligee, immediately become due and owing and paid to the Obligee.
The Obligee under this paragraph shall immediately become a Surety or Sureties under
this bond for the remaining term of the bond.
5) Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal, USACE, the Obligee, or any other person
or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal, U S AC E, the Obligee, or any other person or
entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Principal's
general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any
other insurance. Under no circumstance shall the USACE be responsible to arbitrate any
insurance claims made, declined or disputed under this Bond.
6) The Surety hereby waives notification of amendments to the LIMBI, permits, applicable
laws, statutes, rules, and regulations, and agrees that no such amendment shall in any way
alleviate its obligation on this Bond.

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT TO THE
CONTRARY, THE LIABILITY OF THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY UNDER THIS BOND IS
LIMITED TO THE TERM BEGINNING THE DAY OF , 20_, AND
ENDING THE DAY OF , 20_. AND
ANY EXTENSIONS OR RENEWALS OF THE REFERENCED AGREEMENT SHALL BE
COVERED UNDER THIS BOND ONLY WHEN CONSENTED TO IN WRITING BY THE
SURETY. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE REFUSAL BY THE SURETY TO EXTEND
THE TERM OF THIS BOND SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A DEFAULT BY THE
PRINCIPAL, AND SHALL NOT GIVE RISE TO A CLAIM OR DEMAND AGAINST THE
SURETY UNDER THIS BOND.
In accordance with 33 C.F.R. § 332.3(n)(5), the Surety shall provide the USACE and the Obligee
written notification at least 120 days in advance of termination, revocation, or modification of
this Bond.
No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other
than the USACE or the Obligee named herein, or their successors or assigns.
The above -bounden parties have executed this instrument under their several seals, dated this
day of , 2016, the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being
affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of
its governing body.
U. 0
ME
Principal: • .. ......000M 0 N•• • 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•
[enter name and title]
Surety: [bond company]
Attorney -in -Fact
Obligee: [name of person to receive
111.- 1
By:
Director or Acting Director