20181349 Ver 1_Mitigation Plan Final_20181220

MITIGATION PLAN
FINAL
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Yadkin County, North Carolina
DMS Project Number 97136
DEQ Contract 6898
SAW -2016-01335
FULL -DELIVERY PROJECT
Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03040101
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
December 7, 2018
Prepared by:
si. a
�
KCI
ASSOCI.ATU Or NC
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
KCI Project Staff: Tim Morris, Alex French, Adam Spiller, Joe Sullivan, and Kristin Knight -Meng
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) through
(c) (14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010
These documents govern NCDMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1
2.0
WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION................................................................................3
3.0
BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS.............................................................................................6
3.1
Watershed Processes and Resource Conditions...........................................................................6
3.1.1
Landscape Characteristics.....................................................................................................
6
3.1.2
Land Use/Land Cover and Chronology of Impacts................................................................
8
3.1.3.
Watershed Disturbance and Response...............................................................................12
3.1.4
Site Photographs.................................................................................................................19
4.0
FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL....................................................................................................24
5.0
MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.............................................................................25
6.0
DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN.......................................................................25
6.1
UT Hall Creek (UTHC)..................................................................................................................26
6.2
Tributaries 1 and 1A....................................................................................................................27
6.3
Tributary 2...................................................................................................................................
27
6.4
Tributary 3...................................................................................................................................
27
6.5
Tributary 4...................................................................................................................................
27
6.6
Tributaries 5, 5A, and SB.............................................................................................................27
6.7
Tributaries 6 and 6A....................................................................................................................28
6.8
Tributary 7...................................................................................................................................
28
6.9
Tributaries 8 and 8A....................................................................................................................29
6.10
Tributary 9...................................................................................................................................
29
6.11
Regenerative Stormwater Conveyances.................................................................................29
6.12
Crossings.....................................................................................................................................
29
6.13
Design Determination.................................................................................................................31
6.14
Sediment.....................................................................................................................................32
6.15
Morphological Essential Parameters Tables...............................................................................
34
6.16
Planting.......................................................................................................................................41
6.17
Project Assets..............................................................................................................................41
7.0
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS...........................................................................................................45
8.0
MONITORING PLAN.........................................................................................................................45
9.0
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................................................................................49
10.0
LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN.................................................................................................49
11.0
REFERENCES CITED..........................................................................................................................51
12.0
APPENDICES
12.1
Plan Sheets
12.2
Data Analysis/Supplemental Information and Maps
12.3
Site Protection Instrument
12.4
Credit Release Schedule
12.5
Financial Assurance
12.6
Maintenance Plan
12.7
Stream and Wetland Delineation (Incl. Stream Identification Forms)
12.8
Approved Jurisdictional Determination
12.9
Invasive Species
12.10 Approved FHWA Categorical Exclusion
12.11
Agency Correspondence
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map................................................................................................................2
Figure 2. Project Site Watershed Map..........................................................................................................4
Figure 3. Project Site / LWP Watershed Map...............................................................................................5
Figure4. Soil Survey Map..............................................................................................................................7
Figure 5. Land Use/Land Cover Map.............................................................................................................9
Figure6A. Historic Aerials...........................................................................................................................10
Figure6B. Historic Aerials...........................................................................................................................11
Figure 7. Current Conditions Plan View Map..............................................................................................18
Figure8. Proposed Asset Map....................................................................................................................30
Figure 9. Local Curve for Bankfull Area Determination..............................................................................31
Figure10. Proposed Monitoring Plan.........................................................................................................48
TABLES
Table1. Credit Summary...............................................................................................................................1
Table 2. Existing Stream Bank Height and Entrenchment Ratios...............................................................12
Table3. Existing Wetlands..........................................................................................................................15
Table 4. Project Attribute Table..................................................................................................................16
Table 5. Project Goals, Objectives, and Functional Outcomes...................................................................25
Table 6. Local Curve Bankfull Determination..............................................................................................31
Table 7. Sediment Results and Shear Stress Comparison...........................................................................33
Table 8. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHC-1 (Top)................................................................
34
Table 9. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHC-1 (Bottom)..........................................................34
Table 10. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHC3.........................................................................35
Table 11. Morphological Essential Parameters for T1................................................................................
35
Table 12. Morphological Essential Parameters for T1A..............................................................................36
Table 13. Morphological Essential Parameters for T2-2.............................................................................
36
Table 14. Morphological Essential Parameters for T3................................................................................
37
Table 15. Morphological Essential Parameters for T4................................................................................37
Table 16. Morphological Essential Parameters for T6-2.............................................................................38
Table 17. Morphological Essential Parameters for T6A-2..........................................................................38
Table 18. Morphological Essential Parameters for T7-2.............................................................................39
Table 19. Morphological Essential Parameters for T8-2.............................................................................39
Table 20. Morphological Essential Parameters for TBA..............................................................................40
Table 21. Morphological Essential Parameters for T9................................................................................40
Table22. Project Asset Table......................................................................................................................42
Table 23. Length and Summations by Mitigation Category........................................................................44
Table 24. Overall Assets Summary..............................................................................................................44
Table 25. Monitoring Requirements...........................................................................................................47
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site (MDCRS) is a full -delivery stream mitigation project being developed
for the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101 8 -digit
cataloging unit) in Yadkin County, North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic regime has been
substantially modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, livestock
impacts, and clearing of riparian buffer. This site offers the chance to restore streams impacted by pasture
and agriculture to a stable headwater ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and floodplain access.
The project site is located approximately 0.5 mile north of East Bend, NC in Yadkin County. The existing
primary stream, an unnamed tributary to Hall Creek (UTHC), and its fourteen tributaries are comprised of
13,506 proposed linear feet (If). MDCRS is 0.2 mile north on Shady Grove Church Road (SR -1538) from the
intersection with Shoals Road (SR -1546). The center of the site is at approximately 36.2390°N and
80.5201°W in the East Bend USGS Quadrangle.
The MDCRS will restore a stable stream ecosystem with a combination of Restoration, Enhancement I,
and Enhancement II techniques. The majority of the project streams (78%) will use a Priority 1 Approach
aside from those areas that require a Priority 2 transition out of steep or incised areas. In addition to the
traditional stream restoration actions, three regenerative stormwater conveyances will be used in
combination with seep stabilization and long-term easement protection to treat and protect an additional
1,852 linearfeet of incoming drainage routes in the project watershed. Approximately 0.43 acre of existing
jurisdictional wetlands are also being protected in the conservation easement. Altogether, the project will
restore and protect a vital headwater watershed in the Yadkin Basin.
Once site grading is complete, the unforested portions of the stream buffer will be planted with riparian
species. The site will be monitored for a minimum of seven years or until the success criteria are met. The
table below summarizes the credits that will be produced from this project.
Table 1. Credit Summary
R=Restoration RE=Restoration Equivalent
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, Yadkin County
DMS Contract 6898; DMS Project Number 97136
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Non -riparian
Buffer Nutrient Nutrient
Wetland Wetland
Offset Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Linear
Feet/Acres
7,165
6,340
Credits
7,165
3,125
TOTAL CREDITS
10,290
R=Restoration RE=Restoration Equivalent
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

o
Sa �o
Ararat R� Ier SCO Ra o
Nu^r � dG
U
r `dao
NC -67
�a
SURRY COUNTY
YADKIN COUNTY
Y
N
U �
co
Dr
�a
o
o� m
s 0
Miller Creek
Main St
EAST BEND a°
Ridge Rd
a
e�
Gee
X
eQy
a
\Gr o
DAVIE COUNTY
�� 47 Q)
U y
� rn
N c
o a)
ROWAN COUNTY 2
Figure 1. Vicinity Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
Project Easement Streams Roads N0 0.5 1
KCI _ Cities and Towns Major Rivers State Highway � Miles
2 v

2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The site's watershed, Hydrologic Unit Code (HU) 03040101110070, Grassy Creek and Horne Creek, was
identified in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin RBRP as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
(NCEEP 2009). The watershed is largely rural in nature (31% agriculture and 61% forest with four
documented animal operations). At the time of the River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan, there
were 11.4% of the HU's land in conservation (primarily Pilot Mountain State Park), and the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) marked the HU as a priority area. The RBRP listed impacts from agriculture
use, including stream bank erosion, excessive sedimentation, livestock access to streams, and stormwater
pollution (fecal coliform), as the major stressors within this TLW. The goals and priorities for the MDCRS
are based on the information presented in the Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities:
maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish and wildlife habitat
(NCEEP, 2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
- Managing stormwater runoff
- Reducing fecal coliform inputs
- Improving/restoring riparian buffers
- Reducing sediment loading
- Improving stream stability
- Reducing nutrient loading
- Excluding livestock and implementing other agricultural BMP's
- Protection of high -resource value waters, including water supply watershed designated waters.
The project is also located in the Ararat River Local Watershed Plan (LWP) study area. The Ararat River
was designated a LWP Study Area due to poor water quality and aquatic habitat degradation issues, as
well as the presence of good candidate sites for stream restoration in rural catchments (NCEEP 2009). The
stressors within the Ararat River LWP are erosion and sedimentation, missing or degraded riparian buffers,
stormwater runoff, and nutrient and fecal coliform "hot spots" (NCEEP 2013).
There are no conservation or protected areas located adjacent to the project site. While most of the
project land is in agriculture or pasture, the upstream headwaters have forested riparian buffers. With
the protection of this stream, there will be continuous buffers along the majority of streams within the
project watershed.
The nearest named downstream water body is Hall Creek, which is about 500 feet downstream of UTHC
at the lower end of the project. The confluence of Tributary 8 with Hall Creek is also within the project.
The section of Hall Creek downstream of the site is identified as 12-74, and is classified for surface water
as Class WS -IV. This reach of Hall Creek was not listed as impaired on the 2016 303(d) list.
The project watershed is shown in Figure 2, and another map illustrating the project location in relation
to the LWP is shown in Figure 3.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

[ �RRl1Ll [f] -
I JI. II K ! i�
M Oil
Alf RpCI
yfT6 SL .
Figure 3. Project Site / LWP Watershed Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
Ararat River & Upper Yadkin LWP Project Watershed
�� N 0 1.5 3
KC I 0 14 -digit Hydrologic Units Project EasementMiles
5 Image Source: See map

3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Processes and Resource Conditions
3.1.1 Landscape Characteristics
The site lies within the Northern Inner Piedmont (Level IV 45e) ecoregion of the Piedmont. The Northern
Inner Piedmont has higher elevations and more rugged topography than other areas of the Piedmont and
mostly consists of a mosaic of cropland, pasture, and forest. The natural vegetation contains Virginia pine,
chestnut oak, and many mountain disjunct plant species. This area is typified by rolling to hilly well -
dissected upland that contains mostly gneiss and schist bedrock covered with clayey and micaceous
saprolite (Griffith et al. 2002). The MDCRS is within the Sauratown Mountains Anticlinorium and the
geologic formation mapped at the project is Metagraywacke and Muscovite -Biotite Schist (CZmg), which
consists of metamorphosed basaltic to andesitic tuffs and flows, grayish green to black and locally includes
hypabyssal intrusives and minor felsic metavolcanic rock (USGS 2018). The project watershed consists of
steeper, confined first -order stream valleys converging onto the floodplain of UTHC. The valley along
UTHC varies from semi -confined to open, and boulders and bedrock are interspersed in the reaches.
According to the Soil Survey of Yadkin County, the majority of the proposed project consists of Fairview
soils (FdE2 and FgD2), which are interfluvial soils that transition into floodplain soils consisting of Cordus
loam (CrA) and Siloam sandy loam (SmE) along the lower portions of UTHC and Tributary 8, the two
streams that near the confluence with Hall Creek. The results of the soil survey are presented in the
following map (Figure 4). These soil types do not present any major limitations for typical construction
activities associated with stream restoration.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
0

3.1.2 Land Use/Land Cover and Chronology of Impacts
The project watershed for the MDCRS is comprised of 0.63 square miles (400 acres). Current land use
within the project watershed consists of forest (45%), pasture/farmland (39%), low-density residential
development (15%), and roads (1%); the estimated percent impervious is 3%. The project site is located
in a rural area in northeastern Yadkin County. The development pressure within the project watershed is
low. Current land use is shown in Figure 5.
The MDCRS has undergone modifications that have altered the site hydrology and vegetation. Historic
aerials were examined for any information about how the site has changed over recent history (Figures
6a and 6b). Historic aerials were obtained from the NRCS, USGS Earth Explorer, and Google Earth for 1950,
1963, 1966, 1976, 1993, 2002, 2010, and 2014.
The site has been systematically impacted over the past 65 years. The primary impacts to the system are
associated with channelization and clearing throughout the site to utilize the resources in support of
agricultural production. In the earliest aerial photo from 1950, most of the upstream portions of the
project have already been cleared and there is widespread agriculture occurring along all of the
tributaries. T1 and T1A are forested in the 1950 photo, but were cleared by 1963. A portion of UTHC,
upstream of the confluence with T9, was impacted by silvicultural practices. The field west of the stream
has been cleared by 1963 and was expanded by 1976. The 1976 photo illustrates that the site has been
impacted by several alterations, including the construction of the first chicken house south of T8. Shady
Grove Church Road was also altered and moved away from TBA. Between 1976 and 1993, the area has
had more clearing and low-density development. This includes more residences along Shady Grove Church
Road and Shoals Road, and trees have been cleared along T5, T5A and TSB. These photos also show that
by 2002, the pond at the confluence of T6 and T6a has been built and that the original chicken house
adjacent to T8 was removed, and two additional chicken houses were constructed. Prior to 2010, the
eastern bank of Hall Creek, downstream of the project, was reforested. During this time, UTHC and T9
were impacted by silvicultural practices, including areas of clear cutting. By 2014, a crossing was added
across UTHC in order to access the fields north of T9 and the area around T9 was planted with pine trees.
Over the 65 years of available record, both physical and functional impacts to the project streams on the
site have been documented. These impacts included: channel modification, ditching, impacts from
adjacent row cropping and timber harvesting, and general vegetation removal.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
W

0
t I rl
r
Yt :'10, "40
� r•o-
Figure 5. Project Landuse, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
Land Use Pasture/Farmland (39%) Q Project Watershed (400 ac) N
Water Low -Density Development (15%) O Proposed Easement 0 500 1,000
KCI• Forest (45%) Roads (1%) Feet
9 Image Source: NC One Map Orthoimagery, 2014.

1993
r
2002
'
R
3.
k'
ry
.;
{
'• r
3 i,.
_
. : W
4r`
w
Ili
NCCGIA
NCCGIA � ', ��
x NCC««GIA
2010
2014
�z
ry
7F
'• r
3 i,.
_
Ili
NCCGIA
i
NCCGIA
Figure 6B. Historic Aerial Photographs, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
N
Project Easement
0
1,250
K
C T 1
---i Feet
F
11
Image Sources: USGS Earth Explorer.

3.1.3. Watershed Disturbance and Response
The project site and its 15 streams have experienced landscape and vegetative modifications to allow for
agriculture and grazing. The existing site conditions are shown in Figure 7 and seen in site photographs.
A project -wide assessment of stream stability and causes of impairment was performed at the project.
There are four main sections of the primary channel, which is an unnamed tributary to Hall Creek (UTHC),
and 14 additional streams (tributaries 1, 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5A, 513, 6, 6A, 7, 8, 8A, and 9). The project streams
are generally in Stage III (Degradation) in the channel evolutionary process (Simon and Rinaldi 2006). The
primary disturbance to the system has been the relocation and straightening of the project streams, which
has disconnected flow from a frequently accessible floodplain or floodprone area. There have been
disturbances to the sediment regime of the site, but they are localized on-site from upslope erosion
induced by cattle and direct impacts on stream banks made by cattle hooves. Former or existing dams
have interrupted natural sediment processes on UTHC, T6 and T8. Of the project streams, approximately
29% are experiencing low levels of erosion, 60% moderate levels, and 11% high levels of erosion. The
majority of the project streams have bank height ratios greater than 1.5, as seen in the table below, which
indicates the degree of incision that has occurred across the project channels.
Table 2. Existing Stream Bank Height and Entrenchment Ratios
Stream
Existing Bank Height Ratios
Existing Entrenchment Ratios
UTHC1
1.0-10.4
1.2-2.6
UTHC3
2.7-3.2
1.2
T1
1.0-4.5
1.5-4.4
T1A
19.6
1.1
T2
3.3
1.3
T3
5.5
1.2
T4
6.9
1.9
T6
4.4
1.2
T6A
ponded
ponded
T7
1.7
1.4
T8
2.5
1.1
T8A
2.7
1.1
T9
1.7
1.9
The primary hydrologic feature at the site is UTHC, which runs for 6,619 existing If through the project.
UTHC has been divided into four sections: UTHC1 (1,874 If), UTHC2 (1,494 If), UTHC3 (1,411 If), and UTHC4
(1,840 If). UTHC1 enters the project from a driveway culvert at the southern limit of the project. The upper
700 If are channelized and have been straightened. This section is incised with vertical banks and no
floodplain access; vegetation is limited to a small number of early successional and invasive species along
the banks. From this point forward, the valley topography changes and the bank height ratio decreases.
At this transition, a highly eroded ephemeral drain joins the stream from the west. This drain receives
direct runoff from the adjacent row crop agriculture and contributes sediment and nutrient -rich waters
to UTHC1. After this drain confluence, UTHC1 meanders through alluvial deposits and repeatedly runs into
the adjacent terrace, creating bank erosion just upstream of the confluence with T1. Downstream from
this confluence, UTHC1 flows north to confluences with Tributaries 2 and 3. This section of UTHC1 has
been impacted by livestock and is characterized by eroding banks, no riparian buffer, poorly defined bed
features, and variable bank height ratios. After the T2 confluence, there are numerous bedrock outcrops.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
12

After the confluence with T3, UTHC2 starts as the stream becomes bedrock dominated, which provides
vertical stability along UTHC until the confluence with Tributary 6. The banks are vertical, eroding, and
undercut. There is a vegetated buffer along the western side of the channel, but the width of vegetation
on the eastern side is limited and full of invasive species. Livestock also access this section, with their
impacts spread throughout the stream.
UTHC3 begins approximately 70 feet upstream of the confluence with Tributary 6, and the stream
continues to flow north-northwest. Approximately 33% of this section is experiencing severe bank erosion
and the bed lacks well-developed riffle and pool morphology. The vegetation along UTHC3 is limited to a
narrow vegetated buffer with early successional species. Based on the three surveyed cross-sections, the
assessed channel dimensions are oversized compared to the expected bankfull channel for a stream of
this drainage size. There are spoil piles from channelization along the right bank (mapped on Figure 7).
There is a relic floodplain in this part of the valley, and the LIDAR data show that the open area to the left
of the channel is lowest part of the valley, which indicates that the channel may have been moved to its
current location. Approximately 700 If after the confluence with Tributary 6, the UTHC stream valley
narrows and the stream flows through an old breached earthen dam. After this dam, UTHC3 continues in
a similar condition, but with evidence of potential legacy sediments from a history of agricultural erosion
within the valley.
UTHC4 starts approximately 500 If after the confluence with Tributary 7 at an existing crossing on UTHC.
After the crossing, the channel has widened and bank erosion is predominant. There are still mature trees
along UTHC4 in this area, but many are undercut, and not contributing to bank protection. Access roads
have been constructed through the riparian buffer. After flowing under another utility easement, the
slope of the valley begins to decrease and the channel has been straightened and ditched to allow for row
crop cultivation. The bottom 500 If of this section are straight and incised with minimal bed heterogeneity
and a narrow band of riparian vegetation growing on the banks, ending at an existing crossing over the
channel.
Tributary 1 (T1) begins at a small pond just outside of the project easement and flows toward the
southeast. This channel has been severely degraded by livestock impacts, has sparse riparian vegetation,
and widespread eroding banks. The project easement extends to the northwest here to capture a
spring/seep that flows over bedrock and then to T1. Approximately 300 If downstream of the beginning
of T1 is the confluence with Tributary 1A (T1A), which is a highly incised channel that receives large
amounts of sediment from eroding gullies at its upstream limits. Where T1A begins, the gullies have cut
the stream deep into the landscape, with the majority of its length having bank heights of 12 to 15 feet.
Areas of dumped agricultural and residential trash are also scattered along this reach. After the confluence
of the two reaches, T1 has no buffer and continues to flow northeast to its confluence with UTHC.
Tributary 2 (T2) forms where multiple ephemeral drainages converge. Some of these drains are forested,
while others flow from the adjacent row crops to the east and south. This area is approximately 50 -feet
long and has multiple headcuts contributing to sediment loading to downstream reaches. After this point,
the stream flows west through a valley with a wide hardwood buffer on the right bank and a variable
width buffer on the left. Where T2 emerges from the forest into a pasture, the channel begins to incise
with signs of active erosion and livestock impacts.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
13

Approximately 300 If downstream of the T2 confluence, Tributary 3 (T3) flows into UTHC. T3 is 378 If long
and begins at a seepage -driven wetland. Where the flow becomes concentrated, a deep headcut begins
and the channel becomes incised flowing east. The remainder of this channel has steep eroding banks,
high bank height ratios, livestock impacts, and poorly developed bed features.
Tributary 4 (T4) is 151 existing If, with the hydrology source being a combination of ground and surface
water. Flow begins at a severe headcut, and after this point the stream flows east and is defined by short,
steep, and erosive bed features and bank erosion along vertical banks.
Tributary 5 (T5) joins UTHC from the east. The 1,205 -If stream generally flows to the northwest and the
lower two-thirds of the channel are characterized by a partially confined valley that has a mix of early
successional vegetation throughout the riparian buffer and stream banks. There are several small
headcuts through this portion of the channel, but the channel erosion is moderate. The upper portion of
T5 is split into three small streams at a failing crossing: T5, T5A, and T513. All three of these streams are
close to houses and have some level of buffer clearing and accumulated residential and agricultural trash
from sporadic dumping. T5 is the southernmost and has low bank heights, but the right bank of this
portion of T5 is completely cleared of vegetation. T5A is the next small stream (65 If) to the north; the
vegetation along both banks have been cleared and there is trash in the channel. This stream is fed by a
spring at the top of the reach. The next stream to the north is TSB, which begins at a culvert under a
driveway. This stream is approximately 438 If with channel incision, but a thin line of alders (Alnus
serrulata) on the banks offers some bank protection. After these alders, the riparian vegetation has either
been cleared or is a thicket of invasive species.
The next downstream stream is Tributary 6, part of which is ponded. T6 flows from the east to its
confluence with UTHC. Starting at the top of this drainage, two small tributaries flow into the pond. The
upper portion of T6 (325 If) flows in from the northeast and T6A (157 If) flows in from the southeast. Both
of these are cattle -impacted and embedded with fine sediment where they flow into the pond and their
upstream portions are generally steep boulder and bedrock -controlled channels with isolated areas of
moderate bank erosion. Just of upstream of where T6 joins the pond, there is an eroded access road and
culverted crossing. Sediment is washing off of the road in this location and into T6 and the pond. The
lower portion of T6, approximately 350 If through the pond and then 271 If starting at a piped dam outlet,
is devoid of bank vegetation and has extensive cattle impacts. The dam is earthen, approximately 15 -feet
tall and 100 -feet wide, and impounds an approximately 0.4 -acre pond. There is an overflow spillway on
the north end of the dam. The outlet to this spillway is highly eroded and large amounts of sediment have
been washed downstream.
Tributary 7 (T7) flows into UTHC approximately 150 If downstream of the breached dam on UTHC noted
above. The upstream reach of T7 (165 If) is in a more confined valley with an intact riparian buffer and a
bed controlled by boulder and bedrock outcrops. The lower portion (335 If) is incised, with eroding banks,
headcuts, and minimal vegetation along the banks. There is one wetland area (0.1 acre) along the left
bank midway upstream of T7.
Tributary 9 (T9) is 133 If and is similar to the lower reach of T7. There is an unstable portion of channel
along the downstream segment where T9 ties into UTHC.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
14

The remaining two tributaries, Tributaries 8 and 8A (T8 and T8A), are located on the opposite side of Shady
Grove Church Road from the rest of the site. Both small channels on this side of the road have been altered
by past agricultural practices and have impacts caused by present day livestock access. Tributary 8 (T8)
flows directly to Hall Creek and T8A joins T8 approximately 150 If upstream of this confluence. The
upstream part of T8 begins at a headcut where livestock impacts have destroyed the banks and any bed
form that used to be present. From this headcut, the stream form and banks are more intact as it flows
down the confined and relatively steep valley with bedrock and boulder grade control. The riparian buffer
in this area has scattered medium-sized trees, but minimal understory vegetation other than invasive
vegetation. When the stream comes out of the confined valley, the channel flows into a wetland area
where an old farm pond has filled with sediment and the stream has breached the southwestern side of
the earthen dam. This breach is now an active headcut. From the breach, the stream flows northwest,
through a bedrock ford crossing, and then after several headcuts meets Hall Creek. T8A flows into T8 just
upstream of the bedrock ford. This stream flows in from the east. The stream begins at a large headcut,
about 220 If upstream of the confluence with T8. This portion of channel is damaged by livestock, and has
active headcuts. Overland and seepage flow from the southeastern side of the valley is intercepted by a
toe of slope drain that prevents this hydrologic source from contributing flow to T8A.
A jurisdictional determination was submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers on November 14, 2016
and was approved on January 5, 2017. The approved jurisdictional determination is included in Section
12.8. In addition to the project streams, there are nine jurisdictional wetlands at the site (see Table 3
below). Following the completion of the mitigation plan, a pre -construction notification (PCN) will be
completed to apply for a Nationwide 27 Permit (NWP) to comply with Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean
Water Act with the Wilmington District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the NCDEQ Division of
Water Resources.
Table 3. Existing Wetlands
Wetland
Hydrologic
Cowardin
Size
ID
NCWAM
Class
Class
(Acres)
Location
Left bank along lower end of
WA
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.11
T7
Left bank of UTHC2
WB
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.03
upstream of T6
WC
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM
0.10
Upstream of T3
Upstream of existing pond
WE
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.07
on T6
WG
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PSS
0.01
Upper portion of T8
Right bank along lower
WH
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.06
section of T8
Right bank along lower
WI
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.02
section of T8
Right bank along lower
WJ
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.02
section of T8
WK
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PSS
0.01
Upstream of T8A
The project attribute table below summarizes current conditions at the site and Figure 7 displays the
current conditions at the site.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
15

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Project Information
Project Name Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
County Yadkin County
Project Area (acres) 40.2 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 36.2390°N, 80.5201°W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody
29.2 acres
Stems Planted)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 03040101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 03040101110070
DWQ Sub -basin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres) 400 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 3%
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Forest (45%), Pasture/Farmland (39%), Low-density Residential Development (15%),
and Roads (1%).
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters
All Reaches Combined
Length of reach (linear feet)
14,024
Valley Confinement
Partially confined to confined
Drainage area (acres)
400 acres
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Intermittent - Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C (Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation)
Rosgen Stream Classification
(Existing/Proposed)
F4/G4/C4/B4
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
Stage III
FEMA classification
Zone AE at confluence of T8 and Hall Creek, otherwise none
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters WA,WB, WE, WG, WK WC WH, WI, WJ
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.23 0.10 0.10
Wetland Type Riparian Non-Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series Fairview Fairview Siloam
Drainage class Well drained Well drained Well drained
Soil Hydric Status Non -Hydric Non -Hydric Non -Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A (Preservation) Areas of erosion to N/A (Preservation)
stabilize
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
404
Yes
Applying for NWP 27
Preliminary JD approved
Waters of the United States — Section
401
Yes
Applying for NWP 27
Preliminary JD approved
Endangered Species Act**
Yes
Yes
USFWS
Historic Preservation Act**
No
Yes
NCSHPO
Coastal Zone Management Act **
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Yes
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat**
No
N/A
N/A
**Items addressed in the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix.
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
16
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 4 continued
Stream Parameters
UTHC
Tl, T1A
T2
T3
T4
T5, T513
Length of reach (linear feet)
6,619
1,510
731
378
151
1,643
Drainage area (acres)
389 acres
43 acres
16 acres
7 acres
3 acres
39 acres
NCDWR Classification
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
Rosgen Classification
F4, C4, B4
B4B4 , C4, F4,
G4
G4
B4
B4,C4
Evolutionary trend
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Mapped Soil Series
Clifford/
Fairview,Cordus
Clifford
Clifford
Fairview
Fairview
Clifford,
Fairview
Drainage class
Well drained,
Somewhat
Poorly Drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -Hydric,
Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Slope
1.4-2.1%
2.2-2.6%
3.8%
5.9%
8.9%
2.7%
FEMA classification
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Existing vegetation
community
Pasture, Forest
Pasture
Forest
Pasture, Forest
Forest
Pasture,
Forest
Thermal regime
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Stream Parameters
T5A
T6, T6A
T7
T8, T8A
T9
Length of reach (linear feet)
65
1,103
500
1,189
133
Drainage area (acres)
0.5 acre
29 acres
41 acres
21 acres
29 acres
NCDWR Classification
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
Rosgen Classification
B4, F4
G4
G4
G4
B4
Evolutionary trend
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Mapped Soil Series
Clifford
Fairview
Fairview,
Cordus
Siloam
Fairview
Drainage class
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Slope
N/A
4.1%
3.3%
4.4-5.2%
3.9%
FEMA classification
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X, Zone AE
at confl w/Hall
Creek
Zone X
Existing vegetation
community
Pasture, Forest
Forest
Forest
Pasture, Forest
Forest
Thermal regime
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Warm
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
17
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

3.1.4 Site Photographs
Photo 1: View of livestock impact to UTHC-1
Photo 2: Beginning of T1 at culvert from pond
Photo 3: Active erosion on UTHC-1 just upstream of
confluence with T1
OIL
Photo 4: Headcut at beginning of T2
Photo 5: Cattle -impacted wetland at beginning of T3
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
19
Photo 6: Two headcuts from wetland seep area to beginning
of T3
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Photo 7: Typical view of bedrock in UTHC-2
Photo 8. Representative photo of ephemeral drain that will
be included in restoration project.
Photo 9: Outlet of T5A from a seep.
Photo 10: Typical section of T5A.
Photo 11: Pond at confluence of T6 and T6a
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
20
Photo 12: Pond outlet to T6
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Photo 13: View cattle impact to T6 below pond
Photo 14: Active erosion and deposition on UTHC-3
downstream of confluence with T6
Photo 15: Eroding outer bank on UTHC3
Photo 16: Overwidened section and right bank erosion on
UTHC3.
Photo 17: Eroding bank along UTHC3
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
21
Photo 18: Undercut outer bank on UTHC3
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Photo 19: Active erosion on UTHC-3 just upstream of
confluence with T7
Photo 20: Active erosion on UTHC-3
Photo 21: Entrenched portion of T7
Photo 22: Active erosion on UTHC-4
Photo 23: Active erosion on UTHC-4
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
22
Photo 24: View of UTHC-4.
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Photo 25: Straightened section of UTHC-4
Photo 26. Downstream end of project on UTHC-4
Photo 27: Cattle impact at beginning of T8
Photo 28: View of T8 further downstream
Photo 29: Confluence of T8 and T8A
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
23
Photo 30: Looking downstream on T9
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

4.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
Cattle impacts, vegetation removal, and channelization are among the causes that have reduced the
functionality of the project streams and riparian buffers. The proposed project captures a large proportion
of the project watershed's drainage routing and offers the opportunity to produce functional uplift at the
site that would not otherwise occur within the near future.
The uplift for MDCRS will be achieved at the hydraulic, geomorphological, and physicochemical functional
levels. Hydraulic improvements will come either from relocating projects streams to a location with a
historic floodplain or establishing an accessible floodprone area. Reestablishing this type of connectivity
will return a hydraulic routing system through this stream corridor that will distribute flood flows through
a broader area with reduced in -channel stress rather than within a confined channel. Geomorphological
functional uplift will be achieved through channels sized to the bankfull flow, a planform and profile design
emphasizing bedform variation with woody debris for bank protection and habitat, and the
reestablishment of a forested riparian corridor. As a result, bank migration and lateral stability will be
restored to a sustainable level and the banks and bed will accommodate design flows. Sediment inputs
will decrease due to reduced bank erosion and sediment transport can return to an equilibrium level that
will accommodate watershed inputs. Riparian plantings will further support geomorphological
functionality by increasing bank stability. Physicochemical functions will improve with the reductions in
bacterial and nutrient inputs to the project streams from converted land use (pasture to forested buffer)
and filtering capabilities of the riparian buffer. These nutrient and bacterial parameters will not be
monitored directly, but rather have been estimated as a reduced contribution to project streams of 2.56
x1014fecal coliform colonies, 727 pounds of total nitrogen, and 59 pounds of total phosphorus per year
(based on NCDMS 2016 guidance; see Section 12.2).
Consideration of future impacts to the area that could limit functional uplift opportunities is important
when assessing project potential. As mentioned above, the project will permanently protect the majority
of the streams and drainages in the project watershed. Approximately 89% of the jurisdictional streams
within the project watershed are protected in the permanent conservation easement, and an additional
1,850 If of other drainage conveyances will be included as well. We are improving three of the ephemeral
channels with regenerative stormwater conveyances (RSCs) and stabilizing other non -jurisdictional
features from further erosion. The site will also provide the ancillary benefit of protecting and enhancing
0.43 acre of existing wetlands (shown in the jurisdictional wetlands in Section 12.8 and Figure 7). These
riparian wetlands will be improved by increased overbank flooding and elevated groundwater levels in
proximity to the restored stream channels. Additional riparian wetlands may form alongside the restored
channels as well. In particular, the former pond bed along T6 has the potential to develop new wetlands.
These non-credit generating improvements to the project will help protect the longevity of the restored
streams and the headwater ecosystem as a whole. The table below summarizes the project goals and
objectives that will lead to functional improvements and the monitoring tools that will be used to track
these changes to the site.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
24

5.0 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Table S. Project Goals, Objectives, and Functional Outcomes
Goals
Objective
Functional Level
Function -Based
Monitoring Measurement
Parameter Effects
Relocate or stabilize
channelized and/or
Flood Frequency
incised streams to
Hydraulics
Floodplain
connect to a floodplain
Connectivity
Bank Height Ratio and
Restore
or floodprone area
Entrenchment Ratio
channelized and
livestock-
Install a cross-section
Bank
Cross -Sectional Survey
impacted
sized to the bankfull
Geomorphology
Migration/Lateral
streams to
discharge
Stability
Visual Inspection of Bank Stability
stable C and B -
type channels
Create bedform
Percent Riffle and Pool, Facet
diversity with pools,
Slopes, Visual Inspection
riffles, and habitat
Geomorphology
Bed Form Diversity
Visual Inspection of Feature
structures
Maintenance
Fence out livestock to
Bed Material
reduce nutrient,
Geomorphology
Characterization
Pebble Count
bacterial, and sediment
Restore a
impacts from adjacent
Nutrient and
forested riparian
grazing and farming
physicochemical
Bacteria
Estimated Reductions based on
buffer to provide
practices to the project
Reductions
Converted Land Use
bank stability,
tributaries.
filtration, and
shading
Plant the site with
Geomorphology/
Density
native trees and shrubs
and an herbaceous
Species
Vegetation
seed mix.
Composition
Species Composition/Diversity
Table adapted from Harman et al 2012
6.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
Mitigation at the MDCRS will includes: the realignment of the project streams to their relic floodplains or
development of floodprone benches, exclusion of cattle, installation of three RSCS at point sources of
concentrated flow coming from outside the easement, long-term protection of existing wetlands, and the
establishment of a native riparian buffer.
The project will restore and enhance a total of 13,506 If, which will generate 10,290 If of stream credit
within the conservation easement. An overview map of the proposed mitigation is shown in Figure 8 and
the project plan sheets are included in Section 12.1. Based on the deficiencies described above, a
mitigation work plan has been developed to restore the project streams and achieve functional
improvements. Mitigation will occur along UTHC and multiple reaches along fourteen tributaries.
The project streams were designed using a modified reference reach approach using four stable on-site
cross-sections (see Section 12.2 for data) for dimensional data in combination with pattern data taken
from the UT Fisher River reference and supplemental morphological criteria information from Harmon et
al. 2012. The on-site cross-sections represented areas with evident bankfull indicators (see Figure 7 for
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
25

locations). The UT Fisher River site is located in Surry County, and is approximately 20 miles to the
northwest of MDCRS. The reference site has a drainage area of approximately 0.38 square mile and
sediment size comparable to the range at MDCRS, ranging from fine to coarse gravel for the D50 -D84
values. The common reference values from Harmon et al. 2012 were also used to adjust the design criteria
as necessary to fit the existing site conditions. The range of slopes at the MDCRS (from 1.5% along UTHC
to 11% on T4) required adjustments for each reach.
6.1 UT Hall Creek (UTHC)
UTHC is the primary stream channel at the site and involves 2,927 If of Restoration, 2,208 If of
Enhancement I, and 1,018 If of Enhancement II over four sections that have been divided into eight
reaches. The first section, UTHC1, will involve the restoration of 1,874 If. It begins at the culvert under the
driveway at the southern end of the site. Since the elevation of this reach is controlled by this culvert, the
beginning will start as a Priority 2 approach and then transition to a Priority 1 approach for the majority
of the reach. As this reach transitions to a Priority 1 approach, the stream will be realigned through the
valley bottom with variable bedform and wood habitat features added to the channel. After the
confluence with T2, the restoration design will begin to transition to match the channel form of the next
reach, UTHC2; as a result, two separate cross-section designs (UTHC1 Top for the reach above T2 and
UTHC1 Bottom for the reach below T2 — see plans in Section 12.1) will be used. The end of UTHC1 will
resemble the Priority 2 transition at the top of the reach as the stream gains more bedrock near UTHC2.
The design incorporates these rock features for natural grade control.
UTHC2 begins at the confluence with T3 and is a reach that will provide 1,494 If of Enhancement I. Given
the predominance of bedrock in the profile, there are minimal proposed bed changes, but there will be
modifications made to the channel cross-section. The profile will be enhanced where feasible, focusing
on the addition of deep water pools where possible. The UTHC2 work will focus on grading back and
repairing banks, adding wood to the channel, and extending the floodprone area by benching the channel
where possible. The RSC to be installed along "Ditch 2" (see Figure 8 and construction plans as well as the
RSC section below) will provide additional water quality uplift to this reach. This, in combination with the
stabilization work done on "Ditch 1" along UTHC1, will be considered ancillary project benefits to help
justify the Enhancement I approach for UTHC2.
After the confluence with Tributary 6, UTHC3 starts, which is a restoration reach of 1,411 If. There will be
a transition design to a Priority 1 approach that will follow a similar method used for the transitional
portions of UTHC1, going from a Priority 2 to 1 approach, and then back again to a Priority 2 approach at
the end of the reach. The design transitions UTHC3 back to its historic floodplain, where a new pattern
with riffles, pools, and woody debris in the channel will be constructed. At the end of UTHC3, the stream
will transition back to UTHC4, an enhancement reach.
UTHC4 begins at an existing road crossing approximately 500 If downstream of T7. Mitigation along UTHC4
will be a mixture of Enhancement I and II approaches with four separate reaches: UTHC4-1 with 297 If
Enhancement I, UTHC4-2 with 521 If of Enhancement II, UTHC4-3 with 419 If of Enhancement I, and
UTHC4-4 with 497 If of Enhancement I. This targeted design approach for UTHC4 focuses on stabilizing
banks, working around existing mature trees, creating benches along the existing stream, planting open
areas of the riparian buffer, and reducing exotic invasive species in a way that maintains the existing intact
features and vegetation while improving the degraded portions of stream.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
26

6.2 Tributaries 1 and 1A
T1 will be restored using a Priority 1 approach for approximately 734 If. The design will raise the bed of
the channel so that there is an active floodplain along its length. The easement will also incorporate an
active ephemeral seep coming in from the north before the T1A confluence that will be stabilized and
revegetated. While not a creditable asset, protecting this source of hydrology is a benefit to the project
streams. T1A will be restored for 795 If. A RSC (see below) will be installed upstream of the start of T1A
(STA 148+78-150+00) to reduce sediment and nutrient inputs from the surrounding livestock pasture
runoff. The bed elevation for T1A will be raised as much as possible given the constraints of how deeply
the stream is incised. The wide bench/floodplain meets the DMS design guidelines for Priority 2
restoration. Towards the bottom of the reach where the valley widens to join T1, the design will more
closely align with a Priority 1 approach.
6.3 Tributary 2
For T2, there are two reaches: the upstream Enhancement II reach (T2-1) and the downstream Restoration
reach (T2-2). The upper reach will be enhanced using an Enhancement II methodology for approximately
498 If (STA 200+00-204+98). Channel work at the top of T2-1 will arrest the active headcuts and grade the
banks to a stable angle and form. The rest of T2-1 will receive intermittent bank grading and the areas of
cleared easement outside of the wooded corridor will be planted with native vegetation. Invasive plants
will be treated throughout the easement. T2-2, the lower reach from STA 204+98-207+63, will be restored
using a Priority 1 approach for approximately 265 If. Restoration will begin where the stream leaves the
existing wooded corridor. The design will raise the bed of the channel so that there is an active floodplain
along its length.
6.4 Tributary 3
T3 will be restored using a Priority 1 approach for 369 If. An existing wetland area has been incorporated
into the conservation easement at the head of this tributary. Stream restoration will begin downstream
of this wetland and will raise the bed elevation at the very beginning of the reach where there is an existing
headcut that is partially draining the wetland. The stream restoration will serve to improve wetland
hydrology. The design will raise the bed of the channel so that there is an active floodplain along its length.
6.5 Tributary 4
T4 will be restored using a Priority I approach for approximately 151 If. Restoration efforts will begin at
the upstream end of this reach where there is currently a large headcut. The stabilized grade transition
from the upper part of the channel will allow the stream to match the existing channel elevation
downstream. Further downstream on T4, grade control structures will be installed to stabilize the steep,
degraded stream bed until the confluence with UTHC.
6.6 Tributaries 5, SA, and 5B
These three tributaries will be enhanced using an Enhancement II methodology for approximately 1,685
If. The work along T5 will concentrate on stabilizing local areas of instability, such as near the confluence
with UTHC where there is a failing culverted crossing, intermittent bank grading, livestock exclusion,
invasive vegetation control, removing trash and dumped debris from the channel, and replanting the
cleared parts of the easement. A similar design approach will be used for T5A and T513.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
27

6.7 Tributaries 6 and 6A
T6 and T6A will each be divided into upper and lower reaches. The upper reaches, T6-1 (259 If) and T6A-
1 (60 If), will both be Enhancement II, and the lower reaches, T6-2 (658 If) and T6A-2 (101 If), will be
Restoration. The Enhancement II reaches for both streams have boulder and bedrock grade control. As a
result, enhancement will be take the form of ancillary work, such as stabilization of the access road
adjacent to T6, which has undergone heavy erosion, removal of the entire pond dam and the pond itself,
and the stabilization of the pond overflow area, which is also actively eroding and contributing sediment
to the system.
The restoration reaches, T6-2 and T6A-2, will include the removal of the existing dam. The dam removal
process will require the pond to be dewatered early in the construction sequence to allow adequate time
for both the pond and pond sediments to dewater prior to mass excavation. Based on a bathymetric
survey conducted during the assessment phase of the project, there are accumulated soft sediments that
have embedded the lower half of the existing pond riser structure. The pond will be dewatered initially
using a combination of pumps and siphons that will convey clear water around the pond dam to the lower
portion of T6. Another clear water diversion will be in place to move baseflow from the upper portions of
T6 and T6A (above the pond) to the lower portion of T6, thus minimizing inputs to the pond during the
dewatering period. Once the clear water has been decanted from the pond, a sump will be established
using a perforated 55 gallon drum encased in 57 stone to continue to draw water from the pond
sediments. This water will be pumped through a sediment bag and discharged below the dam. Once the
sediment is adequately dewatered, the fill around the riser structure will be removed to expose the
bottom of the vertical riser pipe. The pipe will be cut off at an elbow to allow clear water to continue to
drain from the pond bottom. It is likely that a diversion channel will need to be temporarily excavated
through the pond bottom to allow sediments and baseflow to bypass the pond through the cut riser pipe.
The temporary channel will be stabilized with coir fiber matting and will be seeded and stabilized. The
pond will then be allowed to naturally dewater for as long as it takes to be able to adequately work the
pond sediment. At that point, the pond dam will be removed as per the project plans. When the dam is
removed down to the riser outlet elevation, the riser structure will be removed and abandoned, and the
stream and floodplain will be graded to match the planform and profile shown in the plans. If workable,
the existing pond sediments will be reused to build the floodplain along with the sediments excavated
from the pond dam. Furnished or salvaged topsoil will be used to surface treat all planting areas within
the floodplain extents shown on the plans. Adequate lime and fertilizer will be used to ensure adequate
vegetative stabilization of the former pond area. The lower reaches will be restored as they transition into
the former pond area. Restoration will then continue with a Priority 1 approach to the confluence with
UTHC3. The design will raise the bed of the channel so that there is an active floodplain/bench along its
length.
6.8 Tributary 7
Similar to other project streams, Us mitigation has been divided into an upper Enhancement II reach (T7-
1 with 165 If) and a downstream Restoration reach (T7-2 with 348 If). The work along T7-1 will consist of
livestock exclusion, riparian planting, intermittent bank grading, invasive vegetation treatment, and
installation of grade control structures. Restoration will begin where T7-2 begins to lose bed and bank
stability. The design will raise the bed of the channel so that there is an active floodplain along its length
and construct a variable bed morphology that the stream currently does not have.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
W

6.9 Tributaries 8 and 8A
T8 has two reaches: T8-1 with 445 If of Enhancement II at the top and T8-2 with 426 If of Restoration at
the bottom of the stream. T8A consists of a single Restoration reach of 263 If. T8-1 begins at a severe
headcut that has been further degraded by livestock, so much so that there are no clearly defined banks
along the stream. A new channel form will be reshaped to connect the stream up and downstream of this
problem area. Downstream of the headcut on T8-1, the remainder of enhancement will consist of
livestock exclusion, invasive species control, and riparian buffer planting. At the transition to restoration
at T8-2, the design will preserve the wetland that has developed in the old pond footprint and create a
transition of the channel through the breached pond dam to begin a Priority 1 restoration continuing until
the confluence with Hall Creek. T8A also begins at a headcut, which will be stabilized, and from that point
the stream will be brought up as a Priority 1 restoration until the confluence with T8.
6.10 Tributary 9
T9 will consist of the restoration of 129 If. Due to the short length of the stream within the project, a
Priority 2 approach is necessary. The design focuses on creating a transition from a new upstream
crossing, which will replace a currently deteriorating crossing, to the confluence with UTHC.
6.11 Regenerative Stormwater Conveyances
As part of the restoration of the whole project watershed, we are installing three RSCs. They will be
installed in key locations where severe erosion is occurring and where storm flows are expected to need
continued treatment from land uses outside of the easement boundaries. The RSCs will also provide grade
control in these steep areas. Each of the RSCs will contain biofiltration components that will enhance
nutrient cycling and serve as a sink for detrimental pollutants before they reach project streams. These
structures will consist of a sand/mulch mixture overlaid with riffle stone (see Section 12.1 for RSC
structural details).
The RSCs are designed to be self-sustaining. Throughout the life of these structures, they will go through
an evolution, which starts as a cascade/pool system that stores and filters stormwater in the underlying
media and then evolves to a cascade/wetland system that treats the water in pocket wetland pools as the
pore space in the underlying media fills. This evolution will occur over different timescales depending on
the conditions at each RSC. This evolution of function and self-sustaining quality makes these structures
ideal for this project.
6.12 Crossings
Ten culverted crossings and one bridge crossing will be installed as part of the project, four on UTHC and
the remainder on T1, T5, T6, T6A (upstream of easement), T7 (bridge upstream of easement), T8, and T9
(upstream of easement). The crossings will be fenced as necessary to exclude livestock. The culverts have
been designed to be embedded V below the proposed streambed elevation to allow aquatic organism
passage and will have floodplain drain pipes to connect flows on either side of the crossing during large
events. These crossing locations are included on Figure 8.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
29

T7-2
T8-1
Ditch 2 RSC
T8�12
T8A-1
UTHC3
ff
4 .
7W "At
A
N 0 275 550
Feet
Image Source: NC OneMap
Orthoimagery, 2014. NoC GIA':
w�w+u'Wir
Figure 8. Project Asset Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
O Proposed Easement (40.2 ac) Enhancement II (1,018 If / 407 SMCs) ■ Existing Culvert
�� Stream Mitigation Ephemeral Drainages or Other Ditches ■ Proposed Bridge
KC I Restoration (7,165 If/ 7,165 SMCs) Exceptions ❑ Proposed Culverts
Enhancement 1 (2,209 If/ 1,472 SMCs) - Regenerative Stormwater Conveyances (3) ❑ Utility Exceptions
30

6.13 Design Determination
KCI conducted bankfull verification by locating four reference cross-sections on-site that had stable
bankfull indicators (see Figure 7 for locations). Using these on-site field measurements, we developed our
own local curve relating drainage area and cross-sectional area (cross-sectional area had a higher R value
than discharge for this site). This curve was compared to the rural Piedmont regional curve estimates for
cross-sectional area (Harman et al., 1999). A summary of the bankfull verification is provided in the table
below. Based on the results, we used our local curve rather than the North Carolina rural Piedmont curve
for our design values.
Table 6. Local Curve Bankfull Determination
Cross -Section Location
Acres
Drainage
Area (Sq.
Miles)
Field XS
Area
(sf)
XS Area Estimate
(sf) from Local
Regional Curve
Q (cfs)
T8 XS1
13.1
0.020
2.5
2.4
13.8
T1 XS2
42.9
0.067
3.8
4.0
13.6
UTHC XS2
52.6
0.082
4.0
4.4
15.6
UTHC XS4
127.8
0.200
7.3
6.6
37.4
1000
•
v Regional curve
• . '' y = 21.433x0.6761
v
100 — —
s :.
o �
W 10 •
0
U KCI curve
• '' y = 13.775x0.4545
R = 0.9511
1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Drainage Area (square miles)
Figure 9. Local Curve for Bankfull Area Determination
S0PP]
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
31

6.14 Sediment
In order to analyze the existing sediment conditions within the project stream, 18 pebble counts were
completed across the site and 2 bulk samples were done on UTHC for trend analysis. These data are
provided in Section 12.2 and summarized in Table 7 below. The sediment sampling shows that the
predominant sizes in the gravel range through the project streams. Bedrock exists along UTHC2 and
UTHC4, and is scattered throughout the tributaries. Based on the sampling and site observations, we
determined that UTHC has an active bed system with a moderate supply of incoming gravel. The
remainder of the project streams all have small watershed areas that drain to them and are supply limited.
Currently, active slope or bank erosion is contributing finer gravels and sands to the project streams, and
these sources will be stabilized during the project restoration. The easement encompasses the majority
of the headwaters for this system and will reduce or eliminate channel erosion. As a result, the project's
headwater tributaries will function as threshold channels, which is defined as a stream where the bed
material inflow is negligible and the channel boundary is immobile even at high flows (Shields et al. 2003).
As opposed to an active bed system, a threshold channel never achieves full sediment transport; the
system only achieves partial sediment transport.
Based on the collected sediment and cross-section data, average shear stress and critical shear stress
values were calculated to compare the existing conditions to the proposed riffle cross-section designs.
The shear stress values for the designed reaches were calculated and related to the movement of a
particular grain size using Shield's threshold of motion curve (Shields et al. 1936). For the existing cross-
sections, the calculations showed that for UTHC, the average shear stress and critical shear stress based
on existing bed material are similar. We will harvest and retain as much of the natural gravel along UTHC
as we can to seed the new riffles. The smaller headwater streams, particularly those with smaller existing
bed material, such as T1A, T4, T6, T8A, and T9, may experience larger average shear stresses than the
critical shear stress based on the smaller types of sediment in these headwater areas. The restoration of
these areas will reduce the upstream sediment supply from slope and bank erosion through the
installation of the RSCS at the top of T1A and T4 as well as the stabilization at the heads of the other
tributaries. In addition, we will install bed and bank protection in these upper reaches to protect the
channels from erosion and excessive scour. Table 7 presents the results from sediment sampling at the
site and the calculated shear stresses across the project streams. The project design aimed to reduce
average shear stress across all of the channels. However, higher slopes in the upper reaches create
average shear stresses greater than the critical shear stress of the existing bed material; as a result, we
have included grade control structures, constructed riffles, and bank protection, among other features,
to prevent excessive mobilization of smaller material.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
32

Table 7. Sediment Results and Shear Stress Comparison.
Reach
Type
Cross -
Section ID
Avg Shear
Stress
(Ib/sf)
Predicted
Grain
Diam. (mm)
Measured
D50 (mm)
Measured
D84 (mm)
Modif. Critical
Shear Stress
(Ib/sf)
UTHC1 (Top)
Existing
UTHC XS2
0.47
36
37
97
0.832
UTHC1
(Bottom)
Existing
UTHC XS3
0.89
69
12
92
0.327
UTHC2
Existing
UTHC X54
1.03
80
5.2
55
0.149
UTHC2
Existing
UTHC XS5
0.82
63
16
65
0.385
UTHC3
Existing
UTHC XS6
0.82
63
26
67
0.546
UTHC3
Existing
UTHC XS6
0.82
63
13.6
30.1
0.256
UTHC4
Existing
UTHC X57
0.71
54
21
86
0.507
UTHC4
Existing
UTHC X57
0.71
54
20.4
44.4
0.408
T1A
Existing
T1A
0.51
38
0.13
2.9
0.004
T1
Existing
T1 XS1
0.93
72
2.8
38
0.080
T1
Existing
T1 XS3
0.87
67
0.062
25
N/A
T2
Existing
T2
0.98
77
21
58
0.451
T3
Existing
T3
1.03
80
25
130
0.649
T4
Existing
T4
1.34
106
0.21
4.3
0.007
T6
Existing
T6
1.31
104
4.1
13
0.082
T7
Existing
T7
1.20
94
22
66
0.484
T8A
Existing
T8A
0.91
71
0.062
0.062
0.001
T8
Existing
T8 XS1
1.11
87
8.5
81
0.248
T8
Existing
T8 XS2
1.40
111
1.4
30
0.046
T9
Existing
T9
1.28
101
0.15 1
0.23
0.002
UTHC1
Proposed
ITHCI
0.79
61
37
97
0.832
UTHC1
Proposed
UTHC1
(Bottom)
0.85
66
12
92
0.327
UTHC3
Proposed
UTHC3
0.74
57
26
67
0.546
T1
Proposed
T1
0.82
63
2.8
38
0.080
T1A
Proposed
T1A
0.81
63
0.13
2.9
0.004
T2
Proposed
T2
0.96
75
21
58
0.451
T3
Proposed
T3
1.34
106
25
130
0.649
T4
Proposed
T4
0.79
61
0.21
4.3
0.007
T5
Proposed
T5
0.79
61
N/A
N/A
N/A
T6
Proposed
T6
0.92
72
4.1
13
0.082
T6A
Proposed
T6A
2.09
168
N/A
N/A
N/A
T7
Proposed
T7
0.75
58
22
66
0.484
T8A
Proposed
T8A
0.96
75
0.062
0.062
0.001
T8
Proposed
T8
1.27
100
8.5
81
0.248
T9
Proposed
T9
1.13
88
0.15
0.23
0.002
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
33
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

6.15 Morphological Essential Parameters Tables
Table 8. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHC-1 (Top)
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
15-50
Reference Condition
Proposed
28-60
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
53
Variable
53
Channel/Reach Classification
F4
B4c
C4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
5.8-10.6
9.0-10.0
6.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.4-0.8
1.1-1.2
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
2.8-4.5
10.4-10.7
3.4
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.8-5.1
4.1-4.5
4.3
Design Discharge (cfs)
11-16
42-46
15
Water Surface Slope
0.021
0.013
0.025
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
Width/Depth Ratio
7.6-28.2
8-10
12.4
Bank Height Ratio
1-10.4
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2-2.6
1.3-2.3
7.7
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
1.3/18/37/97/130/-0.38/15.5
Gravel
Gravel
Table 9. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHC-1(Bottom)
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
15-50
Reference Condition
Proposed
28-60
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
114
Variable
114
Channel/Reach Classification
F4
B4c
C4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
5.8-10.6
9.0-10.0
9.0
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.4-0.8
1.1-1.2
0.7
Design Discharge Area (ft')
2.8-4.5
10.4-10.7
6.1
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.8-5.1
4.1-4.5
4.6
Design Discharge (cfs)
11-16
42-46
28
Water Surface Slope
0.021
0.013
0.021
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
Width/Depth Ratio
7.6-28.2
8-10
13.4
Bank Height Ratio
1-10.4
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2-2.6
1.3-2.3
5.6
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
1.3/18/37/97/130/-0.38/15.5
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
34
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 10. Morphological Essential Parameters for UTHO
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
16-55
Reference Condition
Proposed
40-80
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
297
Variable
297
Channel/Reach Classification
F4
B4c
C4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
14.1
9.0-10.0
12.0
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.8
1.1-1.2
0.9
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
11.7
10.4-10.7
11.4
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
4.4
4.1-4.5
4.6
Design Discharge (cfs)
51
42-46
52
Water Surface Slope
0.014
0.013
0.015
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
Width/Depth Ratio
17
8-10
12.7
Bank Height Ratio
3.2
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
1.3-2.3
5.7
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
2.7/15/26/40/92/-0.24/6.1
Gravel
Gravel
Table 11. Morphological Essential Parameters for T1
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
15-35
Reference Condition
Proposed
30-40
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
43
Variable
43
Channel/Reach Classification
B4, C4, G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
4.1-7.5
N/A
6.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.5-0.7
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft')
2.7-3.8
N/A
3.4
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.6-4.9
N/A
4.3
Design Discharge (cfs)
13-14
N/A
15
Water Surface Slope
0.026
N/A
0.026
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2-14.9
12-18
12.4
Bank Height Ratio
1-4.5
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5-4.4
2.2+
5.4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.13/0.37/3/38/66/-0.06/17.6
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
35
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 12. Morphological Essential Parameters for T1A
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
7-20
Reference Condition
Proposed
25-35
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
29
Variable
29
Channel/Reach Classification
F4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
7.1
N/A
5.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
2.8
N/A
2.5
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.4
N/A
4.2
Design Discharge (cfs)
10
N/A
11
Water Surface Slope
0.022
N/A
0.030
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
18.2
12-18
12.1
Bank Height Ratio
19.6
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
2.2+
6.4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.062/0.072/0.13/2.9/71/0.4/12.2
Gravel
Gravel
Table 13. Morphological Essential Parameters for T2-2
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
10-20
Reference Condition
Proposed
20-30
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
16
Variable
16
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
CO
Design Discharge Width (ft)
3.1
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.5
N/A
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
1.5
N/A
1.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
4.7
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge (cfs)
6
N/A
8
Water Surface Slope
0.038
N/A
0.042
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.3
12-18
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
3.3
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
2.2+
4.9
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.26/13/21/58/84/-0.48/41.8
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
36
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 14. Morphological Essential Parameters for T3
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
6-20
Reference Condition
Proposed
15-25
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
7
Variable
7
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
3.5
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.3
N/A
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft')
1.1
N/A
1.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
4.4
N/A
5.3
Design Discharge (cfs)
5
N/A
9
Water Surface Slope
0.059
N/A
0.059
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
11.3
12-18
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
3.3
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.2+
4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.062/3.1/25/130/240/-0.52/204.2
Gravel
Gravel
Table 15. Morphological Essential Parameters for T4
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
6-13
Reference Condition
Proposed
10-19
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
3
Variable
3
Channel/Reach Classification
B4
B4c
CO
Design Discharge Width (ft)
2.5
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.3
N/A
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft')
0.7
N/A
1.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
5.2
N/A
5.3
Design Discharge (cfs)
3
N/A
9
Water Surface Slope
0.089
N/A
0.113
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1-1.3
1.0
Width/Depth Ratio
9.4
12-18
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
6.9
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
2.2+
3.6
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.11/0.16/0.21/4.3/120/0.41/11.2
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
37
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 16. Morphological Essential Parameters for T6-2
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
10-30
Reference Condition
Proposed
27-35
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
29
Variable
29
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
4.4
N/A
5.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.6
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
2.6
N/A
2.5
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.9
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge (cfs)
10
N/A
11
Water Surface Slope
0.041
N/A
0.034
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
12-18
12.1
Bank Height Ratio
4.4
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
2.2+
4.4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.19/1.6/4.1/13/27/-0.31/12.4
Gravel
Gravel
Table 17. Morphological Essential Parameters for T6A-2
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
20-30
Reference Condition
Proposed
22-30
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
9
Variable
9
Channel/Reach Classification
N/A
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
*
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
*
N/A
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
*
N/A
1.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
*
N/A
6.6
Design Discharge (cfs)
*
N/A
11
Water Surface Slope
*
N/A
0.091
Sinuosity
*
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
*
12-18
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
*
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
*
2.2+
5.3
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
*
Gravel
Gravel
* Existing conditions are ponded.
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
m
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 18. Morphological Essential Parameters for T7-2
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
16-26
Reference Condition
Proposed
17-32
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
41
Variable
41
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
3.2
N/A
6.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.8
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
2.4
N/A
3.4
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
5.3
N/A
4.2
Design Discharge (cfs)
13
N/A
14
Water Surface Slope
0.033
N/A
0.024
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.1
12-18
12.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2.2+
4.3
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
1.2/7.9/22/66/89/-0.30/10.7
Gravel
Gravel
Table 19. Morphological Essential Parameters for T8-2
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
10-20
Reference Condition
Proposed
17-37
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
21
Variable
21
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
3.6
N/A
5.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft')
2.4
N/A
2.5
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
5.5
N/A
5.2
Design Discharge (cfs)
13
N/A
13
Water Surface Slope
0.044
N/A
0.045
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
5.5
12-18
12.1
Bank Height Ratio
2.5
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
2.2+
4.4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.13/2.2/8.5/81/140/-0.25/37.5
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
39
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 20. Morphological Essential Parameters for T8A
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
10-23
Reference Condition
Proposed
14-28
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
7
Variable
7
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
B4c
C4b
Design Discharge Width (ft)
3.1
N/A
4.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.3
N/A
0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
1.0
N/A
1.7
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
3.8
N/A
4.6
Design Discharge (cfs)
4
N/A
8
Water Surface Slope
0.052
N/A
0.044
Sinuosity
1.1
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
5.5
12-18
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
2.7
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
2.2+
4.4
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
N/A
Gravel
Gravel
Table 21. Morphological Essential Parameters for T9
Parameter
Valley Width (ft)
Existing Condition
10-22
Reference Condition
Proposed
16-32
N/A
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
29
Variable
29
Channel/Reach Classification
B4
B4c
CO
Design Discharge Width (ft)
2.9
N/A
5.5
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
2.0
N/A
2.5
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
4.9
N/A
5.0
Design Discharge (cfs)
10
N/A
12
Water Surface Slope
0.039
N/A
0.042
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1-1.3
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
4.3
12-18
12.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
1.0-1.1
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
2.2+
4.0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
0.062/0.13/0.15/0.23/3.7/-0.13/2.0
Gravel
Gravel
Final Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
40
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

6.16 Planting
All unforested portions of the project easement will be planted to establish a forested riparian buffer. The
planting plan is shown in the attached project plan sheets (Section 12.1). Trees and shrubs will be planted
at a density of 968 stems per acre (9 feet x 5 feet spacing) in an area of approximately 19.6 acres to achieve
a mature survivability of 210 stems per acre after seven years. Woody vegetation planting will be
conducted during dormancy. Species to be planted may consist of the following shown in two separate
zones.
Zone 1
Common Name
River Birch
Green Ash
Tulip Poplar
American Sycamore
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Willow Oak
Common Name
American Persimmon
Tulip Poplar
White Oak
Southern Red Oak
Pin Oak
Willow Oak
Scientific Name
Betula nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Liriodendron tulipifera
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus michauxii
Quercus phellos
Zone 2
Scientific Name
Diospyros virginiana
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus alba
Quercus falcata
Quercus palustris
Quercus phellos
Wetland Status (Eastern
Mts & Piedmont)
FACW
FACW
FACU
FACW
FACW
FAC
Wetland Status (Eastern
Mts & Piedmont)
FAC
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACW
FAC
On the restored stream banks, live stakes will be used to provide natural stabilization. Species identified
for live staking include:
Common Name
Scientific Name
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
Black Willow
Salix nigra
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
Common Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
A custom herbaceous seed mix composed of native species will also be developed and used to further
stabilize and restore the site.
6.17 Project Assets
The tables below outline the anticipated project assets that will be produced from the MDCRS project and
are shown in Figure 8.
Final Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
41

Table 22. Project Asset Table
Project
Existing
Restoration
Creditable
Component
Restoration
Approach
Mitigation
Mitigation
Footage/
Stationing
Footage
Footage or
Notes/Comments
-or-
Level
Priority Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Acreage
or Acreage
Acreage
ReachlD
UTHC1
1,333
10+00
11281
1,249
R
P2 10+00-11+50,
1
1,249
Crossing Exception STA 20+51 - 20+83
Top
22+81
then P1
UTHC1
22+81
P1, then P2 24+50-
541
457
438
R
1
438
Crossing Exception STA 25+72 - 25+91
Bottom
27+39
27+39
UTHC2
1,494
27+39
1,493
1,493
EI
N/A
1.5
995
42+32
42+32-
P1 except P2 42+32-
Utility Exception STA 54+07 - 54+49;
UTHC3
1,411
1,325
1,240
R
1
1,240
55+57
44+00 and 53+50-55+57
Crossing Exception STA 55+14 - 55+57
UTHC4-1
55+57
297
297
EI
N/A
1.5
198
58+53
UTHC4-2
58+53-
521
521
Ell
N/A
2.5
208
63+75
1,840
UTHC4-3
63+75-
481
419
EI
N/A
1.5
279
Crossing Exception STA 63+75 - 64+37
6g+55
UTHC4-4
+55-
68 8+97
542
497
Ell
N/A
2.5
199
Utility Exception STA 68+55 - 69+00
73
100+00-
P2 100+00-101+80,
T1
764
107+51
751
734
R
then P1
1
734
Crossing Exception STA 104+00 - 104+16
150+00-
T1A
746
795
795
R
P2
1
795
157+95
T2-1
499
200+00-
498
498
Ell
N/A
2.5
199
204+98
204+98-
T2-2
232
265
265
R
P2
1
265
207+63
T3
378
300+00-
369
369
R
P1/P2
1
369
303+69
400+00-
T4
151
151
151
R
P1
1
151
401+51
T5
1,205
1000+00-
11213
1,182
Ell
N/A
2.5
473
Crossing Exception STA 1003+59 - 1003+90
1012+13
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
42
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 22. Project Asset Table, continued
Project
Existing
Restoration
Creditable
Component
Restoration
Approach
Mitigation
Mitigation
Footage/
Stationing
Footage
Footage or
Notes/Comments
-or-
Level
Priority Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Acreage
or Acreage
Acreage
ReachlD
T5A
65
1200+00-
65
65
Ell
N/A
2.5
26
1200+65
T513
438
1300+00-
438
438
Ell
N/A
2.5
175
1304+38
T6-1
325
600+00-
322
259
Ell
N/A
2.5
103
Crossing Exception STA 602+59 - 603+22
603+22
603+22-
T6-2
621
658
658
R
P1
1
658
609+80
T6A-1
60
650+00-
60
61
Ell
N/A
2.5
24
650+60
650+60-
T6A-2
97
101
101
R
P1
1
101
651+61
T7-2
165
700+00-
165
165
Ell
N/A
2.5
66
701+65
701+65-
T7-2
335
348
348
R
P1
1
348
705+13
T8-1
445
800+00-
445
445
Ell
N/A
2.5
178
804+45
804+45-
T8-2
486
448
426
R
P1
1
426
Crossing Exception STA 808+20 - 808+42
808+94
850+00-
T8A
258
263
263
R
P1
1
263
852+63
900+00-
P1, then P2 900+71-
T9
133
129
129
R
1
129
901+29
901+29
TOTAL
14,024
13,882
13,506
10,290
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
43
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Table 23. Length and Summations by Mitigation Category
Table 24. Overall Assets Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site (Project ID - 97136)
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 10,290
RP Wetland
NR Wetland
Buffer
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
44
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136
Non -riparian
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Restoration Level
Wetland
Buffer (square feet)
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
Non-
Riverine
Riverine
Restoration
7,165
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
2,208
Enhancement II
4,132
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
Table 24. Overall Assets Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site (Project ID - 97136)
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 10,290
RP Wetland
NR Wetland
Buffer
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
44
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

7.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Monitoring of the MDCRS shall occur for a minimum of seven years following construction. The following
performance standards for stream mitigation are based on the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT 2016) and will be used to judge site success.
Vegetation Performance
The site must achieve a woody stem density of 260 stems/acre after five years and 210 stems/acre after
seven years to be considered successful. Trees in each plot must average 7 feet in height at Year 5 and 10
feet at Year 7. A single species may not account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within
any plot. Volunteers must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons before being included
performance standards in Year 5 and Year 7. For any volunteer tree stem to count toward vegetative
success, it must be a species from the approved planting list included in Section 6.16. If monitoring
indicates that any of these standards are not being met, corrective actions will take place.
Stream Hydrologic Performance
During the monitoring period, a minimum of four bankfull events must be recorded within the seven-year
monitoring period for the project streams. These bankfull events must occur in separate monitoring years.
Bankfull events will be verified using automatic stream monitoring gauges on UTHC1 and UTHC3 to record
daily stream depth readings. The project streams must also show a minimum of 30 continuous flow days
within a calendar year (assuming normal precipitation). A "normal" year will be based on NRCS
climatological data for Yadkin County with the 30th to 70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal,
as documented in the USACE Technical Report "Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate
Wetland Hydrology, April 2000."
Stream Geomorphology Performance
The site's geomorphology for all reaches will be monitored per the NCIRT 2016 monitoring guidelines. The
bank height ratio (BHR) should not exceed 1.2. The entrenchment ratio (ER) must not fall below 2.2 for C
and E channels or below 1.4 for B channels. BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not
change by more than 10% from the baseline condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g., no more
than 10% between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5 and 7). There will be an overall assessment for
each reach to distinguish localized versus systemic concerns for that stream. Adjustment and lateral
movement following construction and as the channel settles over the monitoring period are to be
expected. Geomorphological measurements of cross-sections will be used to determine if any
adjustments that occur are out of the range typically expected for this type of stream.
8.0 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring of the MDCRS shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream hydrology, stability, and
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established performance
standards described above. The Proposed Monitoring Plan in Figure 10 shows the proposed locations of
monitoring features described below.
Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring will take place between July 1s' and leaf drop. The success of the riparian buffer
plantings will be evaluated using thirty 0.02 -acre square or rectangular plots within the planted stream
buffer. Eighteen plots will be permanently installed, while the remainder will be randomly placed at the
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
45

time of each monitoring visit. Vegetation must be planted and plots established at least 180 days prior to
the start of the first year of monitoring.
In the permanent plots, the plant's height, species, location, and origin (planted versus volunteer) will be
noted. In the random plots, species and height will be recorded. In all plots, invasive stems will also be
recorded to determine the percentage of invasive stems present. Additionally, a photograph will be taken
of each plot. Beginning at the end of the first growing season, the site's vegetation will be monitored in
years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Hydrologic Monitoring
Bankfull events on-site will be verified using two automatic stream monitoring gauges on UTHC1 and
UTHC 3. Additional gauges and/or recording devices such as cameras (set to record a photo or video a
minimum of once per day) will be installed on T1A, T5A, T8A, and other locations as needed to document
the presence of flow. In addition, two gauges will be installed to monitor groundwater levels within
existing wetlands: one gauge within wetland WA along T7 and another gauge within wetland WH along
T8.
Stream Geomorphology Monitoring
For stream monitoring, the purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream.
Following the procedures established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites
(Harrelson et al. 1994) and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification
system (1994 and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension measurements, longitudinal
profiles, and bed materials sampling.
Mmoncinn
Thirty-two permanent cross-sections (24 riffles and 8 pools) will be established throughout the site to
capture each reach that is being either restored or completed with Enhancement I. More riffle cross-
sections will be used given the amount of Enhancement I reaches on the project. The distribution of the
cross-sections is as follows and as shown on Figure 10: UTHC1 Top (2 riffles and 1 pool), UTHC1 Bottom (1
riffle and 1 pool), UTHC2 (2 riffles), UTHC3 (2 riffles and 1 pool), UTHC4-1 (1 riffle), UTHC4-3 (2 riffles), T1
(1 riffle and 1 pool), T1A (2 riffles), T2-2 (1 riffle and 1 pool), T3 (1 riffle and 1 pool), T4 (1 riffle), T6-2 (1
riffle and 1 pool), T6A-2 (1 riffle), T7-2 (1 riffle and 1 pool), T8-2 (2 riffles), T8A (2 riffles), and T9 (1 riffle).
The extents of each cross-section will be recorded by either conventional survey or GPS. The cross-
sectional surveys shall provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks and will include points
on the adjacent floodplain or valley, at the top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of water,
and thalweg. Width/depth, bank height and entrenchment ratios, as well as bankfull cross-sectional area,
width, max depth and mean depth will be calculated for each riffle cross-section based on the survey data.
The BHR will be measured by using a constant bankfull area over the monitoring period and adjusting the
bankfull elevation each monitoring event based on how this area fits in the cross-sectional data. The
revised bankfull elevation will then be used to calculate BHR along with the current low bank height.
Width/depth ratios, bankfull cross-sectional area, width, max depth and mean depth will be calculated
for each pool cross-section. Cross-section measurements will take place in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Profile
Detailed longitudinal profile will be conducted along the lengths of all restoration reaches during the as -
built survey. Measurements will include slopes (average, pool, and riffle) as well as calculations of pool -
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136
46

to -pool spacing. No additional profile measurements will be taken during the monitoring period unless
deemed necessary due to concerns about bed elevation adjustments.
Visual Assessment
An annual site walk will be conducted at the end of each monitoring period to document any problem
areas. Specific problem areas that could arise include excessive bank erosion, bed deposition or
aggradation, problems with the installed structures, or sparse vegetative cover. The findings of the visual
assessment as well as any recommended corrective actions for problem areas will be summarized in the
monitoring reports by way of a Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) figure.
Photograph reference points (PRPs) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location of each photo point will be marked in the
monitoring plan and the bearing/orientation of the photograph will be documented to allow for repeated
use.
Reporting
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the most current DMS monitoring template from June
2017. The monitoring report shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding
of project status and trends, population of DMS databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in
decision making regarding project close-out. The report will document the monitored components and
include all collected data, analyses, and photographs. The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted
during the first full growing season following project completion. The site will be monitored for
performance standards for seven years after completion of construction. Full monitoring reports will be
completed in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Limited monitoring reports (CCPV, photos, stream gauge data, and
site narrative) will be submitted in Years 4 and 6.
Table 25. Monitoring Requirements
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Pattern and
7,165 If (all restoration
Once, during as-
Additional measurements in later years
Yes
Profile
reaches)
built survey
may be taken as necessary
Yes
Stream
32 cross-sections
Monitoring Years
Dimension
(24 riffles, 8 pools)
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
2 pressure transducer
Stream
gauges; 3 other gauges or
Annual—
1 on UTHC1, 1 on UTHC3, 1 on T1A, 1 on
Yes
Hydrology
cameras on T1A, T5A, and
throughout year
T5A, and 1 on T8A
T8A
Wetland
2 pressure transducer
Annual—
1 within Wetland WH along T7 and 1
Yes
Hydrology
gauges
throughout
within Wetland WA along T8
growing season
30 vegetation monitoring
Monitoring Years
18 permanently fixed, 12 randomly located
Yes
Vegetation
plots
11 2, 3, 5, and 7
each monitoring visit
Exotic and
Locations of invasive vegetation will be
Yes
nuisance
Annual
mapped*
vegetation
Project
Locations of vegetation damage, boundary
Yes
boundary
Semi-annual
encroachments, etc. will be mapped
* See Section 12.10 for proposed invasive species management.
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
47
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

J
m
moms
C� OWBU
w
1 -UN we 9N
wo
we
�wu
m
am
�CDOu�I�
Figure 10. Proposed Monitoring, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
Proposed Easement (40.2 ac) • Proposed Wetland Gauge Enhancement II N
Proposed Monitoring XS (32) Existing Wetlands Ephemeral or Other Ditches
KCI11 Proposed Veg Plots (18 permanent) Restoration Exceptions o 275 550 I Feet
Proposed Stream Gauge Enhancement I Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2014.
il

9.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In the event the mitigation site or a specific component of the mitigation site fails to achieve the necessary
performance standards as specified in the mitigation plan, KCI shall notify the members of the IRT and
work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
The site will be transferred to the NCDEQ Stewardship Program. This party shall serve as conservation
easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied
by the responsible party on a yearly basis until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ
Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the non -reverting, interest-bearing
Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be
governed by North Carolina General Statue GS 113A -232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund
may be used for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land
transaction costs, if applicable. The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to
identify boundary markings as needed. Any fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility the
owner of the underlying fee to maintain.
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
49
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
50
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

11.0 REFERENCES CITED
Griffith, G., J. Omernik, and J. Comstock. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina, Regional Descriptions. US
E.P.A. Last accessed at: https:Harchive.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/web/html/ncsc_eco.html
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J. R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy.
American Water Resources Association. June 30 — July 2, 1999. Bozeman, MT.
Harman, W. and R. Starr. 2011. Natural Channel Design Review Checklist. US Fish and Wildlife Service,
Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD and US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Wetlands Division. Washington, D.C. EPA 843-B-12-005
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins, and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: an Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2005a. Local Watershed Plan for the Yadkin River Basin:
Upper Uwharrie River Watershed. Raleigh, NC. Last accessed at:
http://porta1.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=915e0l64-8786-4a36-91b9-
8305515def02&groupld=60329
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2005b. Upper Uwharrie Local Watershed Plan: Fact Sheet.
Raleigh, NC. Last accessed at:
http://porta 1. ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=80ebfb8a-3478-4ecf-bacl-
e888d8ddb563&groupld=60329
NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services. 2016. Quantifying Benefits to Water Quality from Livestock
Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream Restoration. Last accessed at:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-vendors/rfp-forms-templates
NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services. 2017. Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data Requirements,
and Content Guidance. Last accessed at: https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Library/Guidance%20and%20Te
mplate%20Documents/13_DMS_Mon_Rep_Templ_June_2017.pdf
NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources. 2016 Draft 303(d) list. Raleigh, NC. Last accessed at:
https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-
standards/303d/303d-files
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
51
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources. 2018. Surface Water Classification. Last accessed at:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-
standards/classifications
North Carolina Interagency Review Team. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update. Last accessed at: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-
District-Mitigation-Update.pdf
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
Shields, FD Jr, RR Copeland, PC Klingeman, MW Doyle, and A Simon. 2003. Design for Stream
Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129 (8), 575-584.
Shields, Ing. A., W. P. Ott, and J. C. Van Uchelen. 1936. Application of Similarity Principles and
Turbulence Research to Bed -load Movement. Pasadena, CA: Soil Conservation Service, California
Institute of Technology.
Simon, Andrew and Massimo Rinaldi. 2006. Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The
roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response.
Geomorphology, Volume 79, Issue 3-4, p. 361-383.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
USGS. 2018. Metagraywacke and Muscovite -Biotite Schist.
https://mrd ata. usgs.gov/geo I ogy/state/sgmc-u n it. p h p?unit=N CCAZmg; 5
Draft Mitigation Plan
December 7, 2018
52
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
DMS Project Number 97136

12.0 APPENDICES
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

12.1 Plan Sheets
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

5
l
O
b
U
ti
0•
4b
VICINITY MAP l
NOT TO SCALE
YADKIN RIVER
1003
GENERAL NOTES & PROJECT LEGEND
D
Proposed Existing
Stationing Footage
GROVE
1552
7-14
S�P�I
n 1546
R 1:1 734 734
21-22
PLANTING PLAN
T1A
150+00 to 157+95 739
v
PROJECT
T2-1
O'ST ENTRANCE
1550
T2-2
67
R 1:1 265 265
T3
67
1542
Z
T4
v
R 1:1 151 151
z
T5*
1000+00 to 1012+13 1,174
Ell 2.5:1 1,182 473
r„
v
VICINITY MAP l
NOT TO SCALE
DIRECTIONS TO SITE
From Raleigh, follow 1-40 West towards Winston—
Salem. Take exit 188 to follow US -421 North. Take
exit 244 off of US -421 onto Williams Road. At the
traffic circle take the third exit onto Shallowford Rd.
Turn right onto Conrad Rd. Turn left onto Old US421.
Turn right onto Flint Hill Rd. Turn left onto Main St.
Slight right onto Fairground Rd. Turn right onto Shady
Grove Rd. Follow for about a mile; the site entrance
will be at 4413 Shady Grove Church Rd.
NCDEQ DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
MILL DAM CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH
NROp.O
�Rc
PO GROPE GN
SN
I SHEET 7—_--___
I
I
_ C
BEGIN ---- SHEET a
UTHC
80°31'04.1918"
36°13'55.2820"
i
INDEX OF SHEETS
1
PROJECT COMPONENTS —TOTAL CREDITS 10,290
2
GENERAL NOTES & PROJECT LEGEND
Reach ID
Proposed Existing
Stationing Footage
Approach Mitigation R Footage R -or- R
Ratio Equivalent
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS
7-14
T1*
100+00 to 107+51 748
R 1:1 734 734
21-22
PLANTING PLAN
T1A
150+00 to 157+95 739
R 1:1 795 795
O
T2-1
200+00 to 204+98 498
Ell 2.5:1 498 199
T2-2
204+98 to 207+63 265
R 1:1 265 265
T3
300+00 to 303+69 378
R 1:1 369 369
T4
400+00 to 401+51 151
R 1:1 151 151
T5*
1000+00 to 1012+13 1,174
Ell 2.5:1 1,182 473
T5A
1200+00 to 1200+65 65
Ell 2.5:1 65 26
T513
1300+00 to 1304+38 438
Ell 2.5:1 438 175
T6-1*
600+00 to 602+59 259
Ell 2.5:1 259 104
T6-2
602+59 to 609+80 621
R 1:1 658 658
T6A-1
650+00 to 650+60 60
Ell 2.5:1 60 24
T6A-2
650+60 to 651+61 97
R 1:1 101 101
T7-1
700+00 to 701+65 165
Ell 2.5:1 165 66
T7-2
701+65 to 705+13 335
R 1:1 348 348
T8-1*
800+00 to 804+45 445
Ell 2.5:1 445 178
T8-2
804+45 to 808+94 464
R 1:1 426 426
T8A
850+00 to 852+63 258
R 1:1 263 263
T9
900+00 to 901+29 133
R 1:1 129 129
UTHC1
Top*
10+00-22+81 1,333
R 1:1 1,249 1,249
UTHC1
Bottom*
22+81-27+39 541
R 1:1 438 438
UTHC2
27+39-42+32 1,494
EI 1.5:1 1,493 995
1
42+32-55+57 1,411
R 1:1 1,240 1,240
UTHC4-1
55+57-58+53
58+53-63+75
63+75-68+55 1,840
68+55-73+97
EI 1.5:1 297 198
1
Ell 2.5:1 521 208
UTHC4-3*
EI 1.5:1 419 279
UTHC4-4*
Ell 2.5:1 497 199
* Crossings have been removed from creditable linear footage for all project streams.
DIRECTIONS TO SITE
From Raleigh, follow 1-40 West towards Winston—
Salem. Take exit 188 to follow US -421 North. Take
exit 244 off of US -421 onto Williams Road. At the
traffic circle take the third exit onto Shallowford Rd.
Turn right onto Conrad Rd. Turn left onto Old US421.
Turn right onto Flint Hill Rd. Turn left onto Main St.
Slight right onto Fairground Rd. Turn right onto Shady
Grove Rd. Follow for about a mile; the site entrance
will be at 4413 Shady Grove Church Rd.
NCDEQ DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
MILL DAM CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION SITE
YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH
NROp.O
�Rc
PO GROPE GN
SN
I SHEET 7—_--___
I
I
_ C
BEGIN ---- SHEET a
UTHC
80°31'04.1918"
36°13'55.2820"
i
INDEX OF SHEETS
1
TITLE SHEET
2
GENERAL NOTES & PROJECT LEGEND
3-5
DETAILS
6
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS
7-14
SITE PLAN
15-20
PROFILES
21-22
PLANTING PLAN
23-24
BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN
CAROLINA, --'-
BEGIN --I L BEGIN -- - SHEET 10
TRIB 2 TRIB 5
Prepared for:
MATTHEW REID
DMS PROJECT MANAGER
LIN XU
DMS REVIEW COORDINATOR
Prepared In the Off/ce of:
j C
�� ASSOCIATES
'NC
ENGINEERS• PLANNERS- ECOLOGISTS
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD
SUITE 400
RALEIGH, NC 27609
STATE
DMS PROJECT NUMBER
m9)136
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
�0
97136
1
24
O
STATE
DMS PROJECT NUMBER
m9)136
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
�0
97136
1
24
REVISIONS
SII
)BEGIN
END
UTHC /
/ I
I /
/ I
/ I
—1 I
I /
I /
I /
r\ /
I /
I /
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
— SHEET It
BEGIN
TRIB 6
Prepared by:
GARY M. MRYNCZA, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
ALEX FRENCH
PROJECT DESIGNER
PROJECT ENGINEER
�,•• tH CAgC ��..
Z
SEAL
=W.. 32733 t
X91- V'=
SIGNATURE:
P.E.

%Wli it tool,
+ ZH CAgQ ��..
GENERAL NOTES:
CONTROL POINTS
�''�,"'
DESCRIPTION
NORTHING
EASTING
ELEV
POINT
SEAL
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES:
Q ; 32733
-ALL BEARINGS ARE NAD 1983 GRID BEARINGS.
MILL DAM 1
906433.72
1552754.88
1007.74
1
: 7
- ALL DISTANCES AND COORDINATES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL
MILL DAM 2
906784.49
1550793.65
999.31
2
�.'9j.'• rR pti� •
o
(GROUND) VALUES.
MILL DAM 3
908920.82
1550521.12
968.14
3
:��j•• 4
'. +� '' P
•f'•.�'IAEL �;.+'`+
N
_ >
MILL DAM 4
910728.58
1548637.89
931.06
4
•��"""`���
UTILITY/SUBSURFACE PLANS:
MILL DAM 5
911824.03
1550305.86
861.62
5
- NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT.
MILL DAM 6
910632.90
1554600.60
963.71
6
- EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED.
MILL DAM 7
909965.25
1552331.55
947.62
7
- THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING A UTILITY
RV6
926085.40
1539064.52
805.05
9
LOCATOR AND ESTABLISHING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND
AUTUMN
915514.39
1574618.78
802.30
10
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT REACH.
EAST BEND
901350.85
1553874.99
1068.88
11
KCI
906899.28
1552214.96
956.99
12
KCI
907390.22
1552074.10
939.31
13
KCI#14
906839.03
1551169.59
979.01
14
KCI#15
907378.47
1551306.72
952.23
15
KCI#16
908093.58
1552046.36
924.83
16
ow
KCI#17
908557.45
1551959.23
924.62
17
Z-
KCI#18
907613.45
1551482.76
937.21
18
��
KCI
907521.34
1551394.95
944.63
19
'-
QZ
0
KCI
907211.62
1551314.00
955.42
20
as
KCI
907089.19
1551294.01
959.66
21
u�-
KCI
906963.06
1551259.62
958.01
22
Z�
KCI
909054.89
1551675.91
904.30
400
CONTACT DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE FOR FULL LIST OF CONTROL POINTS
o
U
U)
w �
LL W
o �
U
W
��K
fq Q
QD
�Q
wU
¢¢
LEGEND:
a
UJofPROJECT
oz
W
<w
z
QLQ01
Proposed Thalweg
Existing Tree Line .......................................
W
w/Approximate Bankfull Limits--------------
Minor Contour Line
Proposed Step Pool
------------------------------------
Major Contour Line
---720---
LU
Z
Proposed Riffle Enhancement ----------------
o
Y z
LLI
O
Proposed Riffle Grade Control ------------- �o
� Q
U QO
z
Proposed Riffle Cascade
o w
z
J �
j
J
O
Proposed Live Lift---------------------------------
2
z
w
�
o
Existing Channel to be Filled----------------
}
Proposed Channel Block
onre: AUGUST 2018
N.T.S.
GENERAL
NOTES
&
PROJECT
LEGEND
SHEET 2 OF
24

NOTES:
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR COIR MATTING
TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WATER TO UNDERLAIN BY
A STREAM SECTION. SEED, AND FER
-ALL DISTURBED AREAS INSIDE FLOOD-
PLAIN EXTENTS SHALL BE SEEDED DAILY.
-GROUND SHALL BE PREPARED AND SEED
& FERTILIZER APPLIED ACCORDING TO
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG
BOTH SIDES OF NEW STREAM LENGTH.
-MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM TOE
OF SLOPE TO THE TOP OF BANK.
-MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED AND STAKED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT
SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
�l1" x 2" NOTCHED
GRADE STAKE
ANCHORING
COIR MATTING
SCALE:NTS
Wbkf
INSTALL TO ONLY HALF TYPICAL RIFFLE
BANKFULL ON INNER
BENDS OF POOLS
Wbkf
— -- BANKFULL
USE BURLAP BACKED HEAVY COIR
NOTE:
MATTING ON ALL LIFTS. BACKFILL
f"-` WATER SURFACE
INSTALLED ALONG ENTIRE
WITH SUITABLE GROWING MATERIAL.
BANK HEIGHT FOR STEP
z
INSTALL LIVE WHIPS BETWEEN SOIL LIFTS
USE 700 GRAM COIR MATTING
¢
m
WITH APPROX. 1 FOOT OF PLANT MATERIAL
ON ANY GRADED BENCHESa
p LL
EXPOSED. MINIMUM LENGTH OF CUTTINGS
OR TERRACE SLOPES
r O
SHALL BE 4'. DISTANCE BETWEEN CUTTINGS
SHALL BE 4". FILL VOIDS WITH SUITABLE SOIL.
—I I
I -I
_
4" EXPOSED
STONE BASE
CJO
,�qq
�CJO
L/ BV'SSEFLOW
O
OD,
—o
=00
o
0000 0�0, =
o o 0
5' MINIMUM
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
10%CABC STONE
r
�I INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
10% CLASS A STONE
DEBRIS THAT EXTENDS INTO
20% CLASS B STONE
SECTION A -A
POOL TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
60% CLASS 1 STONE
NOTE:
USE 1.5'x1"x2" WOODEN STAKES ON V CENTERS.
STAKES SHALL HAVE A'ROOFING'
NAIL AT TOP
TO KEEP FABRIC FROM SLIPPING OFF.
LIVE LIFT
SCALE:NTS
NOTES:
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR COIR MATTING
TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WATER TO UNDERLAIN BY
A STREAM SECTION. SEED, AND FER
-ALL DISTURBED AREAS INSIDE FLOOD-
PLAIN EXTENTS SHALL BE SEEDED DAILY.
-GROUND SHALL BE PREPARED AND SEED
& FERTILIZER APPLIED ACCORDING TO
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG
BOTH SIDES OF NEW STREAM LENGTH.
-MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM TOE
OF SLOPE TO THE TOP OF BANK.
-MATTING SHALL BE APPLIED AND STAKED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROJECT
SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
�l1" x 2" NOTCHED
GRADE STAKE
ANCHORING
COIR MATTING
SCALE:NTS
Wbkf
INSTALL TO ONLY HALF TYPICAL RIFFLE
BANKFULL ON INNER
BENDS OF POOLS
Wbkf
EXAMPLE COIR MATTING PLACEMENT
SCALE:NTS
`% ,11111111+�
.�•''�cM CAga'�•,,
09
SEAL
p 32733 of
•!Y�1N ��
M�
., EL• •�
�lo11141141 I11
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
1 MIN. COMPACTED
FINISH GRADE 5' BACKFILL
FLOW
COMPACTED CHANNEL
BACKFILL MINo 1.0' THICK Z,g 2y INVERT
SEDIMENT CONTOL STONE
CLASSISTONE
CHANNELBLOCK
SCALE:NTS
LAY FILTER FABRIC OVER UPSTREAM
TOP EDGE OF SILL ROCK(S); BEHIND
FILTERFABRIC, BACKFILL WITH #57 SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR
STONE, CLASS A OR B STONE AND/OR STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
NATURAL STREAM MATERIALS.
0
w
PROPOSED
PROFILE w
Q
FLOW —y 3
z z z
BASEFLOW m m 13 m
LI—LI—LI—LI- I �
FINISHED INSTALL CENTER BOULDER p O LL p W LU
GRADE = SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN SIDE O O O
=JJ1=JJ1=JJ1=JJ1 JJ1-JJ1—JJ1 BOULDERS TO FORCE FLOW r r rLL
TO CENTER OF CHANNEL
IF 11_��� 111_���_�1 III— 1 11 11 11 111 111 11 1111_11 11 11 SF11111111 11 111 Hill I 1=111 11 11 11 111 111 1 11 111 11 11 T
INSTALL SILL AT 8'ANGLE MIN. I SFT
FILTER STONE, 18" NOM. THICKNESS FILTER FABRIC TO ENCOURAGE FLOW MIN.
FABRIC BOULDERS WELL GRADED MIX OF (KEY IN UNDER AWAY FROM OUTER BANK
(60%) CLASS "1", (20%) CLASS "B", STREAM BED)
(10%) CLASS "A", AND (10%) #57 d 6FT. MIN.
18" NOM. THICKNESS WELL ID (SINGLE
PROFILE VIEW GRADED MIX OF (60%) CLASS "1", �/� STEP
(20%) CLASS "B", (10%) CLASS "A", 0 POOLS)
AND (109/6) NO. 57 STONE /
/
NOTES: STONE TOE: /
START ROCK 2FT
FOR DOUBLE STEP POOLS, CONTINUE ROCK MIXTURE BELOW WATERS EDGE
FROM FIRST SILL ALL THE WAY TO THE SECOND SILL. AND EXTEND TO 0.5FT
DO NOT STOP AT THE 6FT MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVE WATERS EDGE
SINGLE STEP POOL PLAN VIEW.
BOULDERS SHOULD BE NATIVE STONES OR SHOT Q
ROCK, ANGULAR AND OBLONG, WITH AN AXIS
APPROXIMATELY SL x Z W x 1.5'D.
BOULDER SILLS TO EXTEND 5' MINIMUM INTO STREAM
BANKS FOR STEP POOL STRUCTURES.
STONE INSTALLATION: START BY INSTALLING STONE
MIXTURE. THEN ADD SURGE STONE TO FILL IN VOIDS.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM MATERIAL
TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
IF APPROVED BY DESIGNER, BOULDER SILLS CAN BE PLAN VIEW
REPLACED WITH LIVE HARDWOOD LOGS FOUND ON O
SITE. LOGS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10" DIAMETER
AND STACKED IN A TRIANGLE FORMATION. . O
NAIL (WITH PLASTIC WASHER) FILTER FABRIC TO
THE TOP LOG AND CONTINUE DOWN AND UNDER
STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON STEP POOL DETAIL. LOG SILL
STEP POOL
SCALE:NTS
W
I—
W
Y z
w _0
W I-_
of Q
U Q�
20
Q ~
0 �
W
J �
J �
Q
LU
N.T.S.
0
0
o
w�
6 N
nQ
QQ J
0
O
W
WUQ
cn =
wr
w�
Z
LLO Z
O
J (�
aw
DETAILS
— -- BANKFULL
— GROUND SURFACE
NOTE:
COIR MATTING SHALL BE
f"-` WATER SURFACE
INSTALLED ALONG ENTIRE
TYPICAL POOL
BANK HEIGHT FOR STEP
COIR MATTING
POOL STRUCTURES
EXAMPLE COIR MATTING PLACEMENT
SCALE:NTS
`% ,11111111+�
.�•''�cM CAga'�•,,
09
SEAL
p 32733 of
•!Y�1N ��
M�
., EL• •�
�lo11141141 I11
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
1 MIN. COMPACTED
FINISH GRADE 5' BACKFILL
FLOW
COMPACTED CHANNEL
BACKFILL MINo 1.0' THICK Z,g 2y INVERT
SEDIMENT CONTOL STONE
CLASSISTONE
CHANNELBLOCK
SCALE:NTS
LAY FILTER FABRIC OVER UPSTREAM
TOP EDGE OF SILL ROCK(S); BEHIND
FILTERFABRIC, BACKFILL WITH #57 SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR
STONE, CLASS A OR B STONE AND/OR STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
NATURAL STREAM MATERIALS.
0
w
PROPOSED
PROFILE w
Q
FLOW —y 3
z z z
BASEFLOW m m 13 m
LI—LI—LI—LI- I �
FINISHED INSTALL CENTER BOULDER p O LL p W LU
GRADE = SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN SIDE O O O
=JJ1=JJ1=JJ1=JJ1 JJ1-JJ1—JJ1 BOULDERS TO FORCE FLOW r r rLL
TO CENTER OF CHANNEL
IF 11_��� 111_���_�1 III— 1 11 11 11 111 111 11 1111_11 11 11 SF11111111 11 111 Hill I 1=111 11 11 11 111 111 1 11 111 11 11 T
INSTALL SILL AT 8'ANGLE MIN. I SFT
FILTER STONE, 18" NOM. THICKNESS FILTER FABRIC TO ENCOURAGE FLOW MIN.
FABRIC BOULDERS WELL GRADED MIX OF (KEY IN UNDER AWAY FROM OUTER BANK
(60%) CLASS "1", (20%) CLASS "B", STREAM BED)
(10%) CLASS "A", AND (10%) #57 d 6FT. MIN.
18" NOM. THICKNESS WELL ID (SINGLE
PROFILE VIEW GRADED MIX OF (60%) CLASS "1", �/� STEP
(20%) CLASS "B", (10%) CLASS "A", 0 POOLS)
AND (109/6) NO. 57 STONE /
/
NOTES: STONE TOE: /
START ROCK 2FT
FOR DOUBLE STEP POOLS, CONTINUE ROCK MIXTURE BELOW WATERS EDGE
FROM FIRST SILL ALL THE WAY TO THE SECOND SILL. AND EXTEND TO 0.5FT
DO NOT STOP AT THE 6FT MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVE WATERS EDGE
SINGLE STEP POOL PLAN VIEW.
BOULDERS SHOULD BE NATIVE STONES OR SHOT Q
ROCK, ANGULAR AND OBLONG, WITH AN AXIS
APPROXIMATELY SL x Z W x 1.5'D.
BOULDER SILLS TO EXTEND 5' MINIMUM INTO STREAM
BANKS FOR STEP POOL STRUCTURES.
STONE INSTALLATION: START BY INSTALLING STONE
MIXTURE. THEN ADD SURGE STONE TO FILL IN VOIDS.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM MATERIAL
TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
IF APPROVED BY DESIGNER, BOULDER SILLS CAN BE PLAN VIEW
REPLACED WITH LIVE HARDWOOD LOGS FOUND ON O
SITE. LOGS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10" DIAMETER
AND STACKED IN A TRIANGLE FORMATION. . O
NAIL (WITH PLASTIC WASHER) FILTER FABRIC TO
THE TOP LOG AND CONTINUE DOWN AND UNDER
STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON STEP POOL DETAIL. LOG SILL
STEP POOL
SCALE:NTS
W
I—
W
Y z
w _0
W I-_
of Q
U Q�
20
Q ~
0 �
W
J �
J �
Q
LU
N.T.S.
0
0
o
w�
6 N
nQ
QQ J
0
O
W
WUQ
cn =
wr
w�
Z
LLO Z
O
J (�
aw
DETAILS

Y Y
O
am k m
O m O SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEET
FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS
WRAP AND STAKE COIR
MATTDER
T MIN. CO SIT UCITED BANK
SEE NOTE -
BELOW I �I
T MIN. 10%CABC STONE
10% CLASS A STONE
20% CLASS B STONE
SECTION 60% CLASS 1 STONE
NOTE:
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
DEBRIS TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
Z w
Z5 LL SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR
m STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS Z LL
FOR BEGIN AND END OF w
RIFFLE
TAPER STONE INTO
FLOW -r _y, - BASEFLOW EXISTING STREAM BED
------ --_-------
OV\OE 0 cam. . _0... '. ,:.� •. o. •.0..'.( •. OO o POOL
PROFILE
NOTE:
STONE INSTALLATION: START BY INSTALLING STONE
MIXTURE. THEN ADD SURGE STONE TO FILL IN VOIDS.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM MATERIAL
TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
SCALE:NTS
50%, 30%, 20% MIXTURE OF
CLASS B STONE, CLASS A
z
z
STONE AND NATIVE SOIL
am
O
0t
m O
SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEET
BOULDER
FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS
6" MINIMUM
DROP
(SEE NOTE BELOW)
BOULDER
SECTION
TAPER RIFFLE MATERIAL
NOTE:
START BY INSTALLING CLASS B STONE
AND CLASS A STONE MIXTURE. FINISH RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT
BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM
MATERIAL TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE. SCALE: NTS
10 FEET
4" OF CRUSHER RUN PROOF ROLL AND
ROCK COMPACTED SLOPE 1/4" SLOPE 1/4" STABILIZE
FOR SMOOTH FINISH PER FOOT PER FOOT
21
i
CRUSHER RUN STONE PROOF ROLL AND
UNDERLAIN WITH WOVEN STABILIZE SUBGRADE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
STABILIZED ACCESS DRIVE
SCALE:NTS
j11�111111 �1+,,
SEAL -
32733
i
CkP■I�C�S�a'-t
DESIGNED BEGIN
DESIGNED END
RIFFLE ELEVATION
RIFFLE ELEVATION
BOULDER
DROP
BOULDER
TAPER RIFFLE MATERIAL
DROP
BOULDER
INTO FINAL GRADE
COMING OUT OF POOL
DROP
FLOW
DISTRIBUTE RIFFLE GRADE
POOL
p
�\ �%
EVENLY THROUGHOUT
ELEVATION
o
BOULDER DROPS
O p
p
O 0
SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR
STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
0
FOR BEGIN AND END OF
SECTION B -B' (LONGITUDINAL VIEW)
RIFFLE
DESIGNED POOL
ELEVATION
Y 0 Y
O
m m
a r
STABILIZE
BANKS
p m p
WITH700
GRAM
COIR
MATTING
WRAP AND STAKE COIR
MATTING UNDER
CONSTRUCTED BANK
`6
_
u o
\
00 / Op
_, ...
I MIN
SECTION A -A' (CROSS-SECTION VIEW]
10%CABC STONE
10% CLASS A STONE
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE
NOTE:
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
DEBRIS THAT EXTENDS INTO
POOL TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
rA
I
BOULDER DROP
a•- •o
•o •o
•o •o
•o •o 'o •�
•o',
.O o •o'e
.o , •o'e .o e
a
.o e •o'e .o ° •o'° °
o-
oLO
FLOW o o
>
e ° •o'° ° •o
e ° o'e ° ° •o
° o'e ° ° -o'° ° o'e ° ° o'
° o ° ° ° •o e ° ° ° o'e °
oo- °
°bo• o °°ga•
oo- oo'
°oo• °g
o ao' oo o0
°oo• �o• °oo•
00 oo' oo- oo
a °oo• bo• °oo• �a
BOTTOM OF BANK
-
_—
--o o _ _--o
o --o o
-o o --o o --o o _-o �
-o o -- o o _• o —• o o —
—_—_—
TOP OF BANK
TOP(BAOF BA
�L A
VARIES
��
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
WRAP AND STAKE COIR MATTING UNDER
CONSTRUCTED BANK THROUGHOUT
ENTIRE LENGTH OFF RIFFLE SECTIONS.
CASCADING RIFFLE
SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEET FOR EXACT
SCALE:NTS
DIMENSIONS.
W Q
L Z
(n J
O
Y Z Q
t Q F
U [)� of
O_ z
pU
W
N.T.S.
DETAILS

CASCADE POOL RIFFLE POOL RIFFLE POOL RIFFLE
REGENERATIVE STORMWATER CONVEYANCE DETAIL - PLAN VIEW
SCALE:NTS
RIFFLE
CASCADE / WEIR
TO STA.
STONES
POOL
POOL
GEOTEXTILE
GEOTEXTILE
1.4
FABRIC
FABRIC
1.1
100
I
1.4
f
1,
VARIES
1.4
SAND MULCH J
EMBED FOOTER
BOULDERSA
MIX
MINIMUM OF 2.0 FT
DRAINAGE DITCH 1
INTO GROUND IN
1.5
CASCADES
EMBED FOOTER
RIFFLE
POOL
TO STA.
RIFFLE
POOL
DESCRIPTION
GEOTEXTILE
148+94 149+02 14
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
FABRIC
1.1
100
149+44 149+52 14
1.4
VARIES
1' O
�o O
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
149+92 150+00 14
VARIES
RSC RIFFLE
DRAINAGE DITCH 1
1400+00 1400+10 7
1.5
RSC ENHANCED RIFFLE
EMBED FOOTER
D
BOULDERSARSA
1400+43 1400+57 7
MINIMUM OF 0.5 FT
RIFFLE
INTO GROUND IN
1450+00
RIFFLES
SECTION A - A'- TYPICAL PROFILE VIEW
SCALE:NTS
NOTES:
- FOR TRIBUTARY T1A, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BELOW RIFFLE STONE SHALL BE
BACKED BY 1 FOOT OF CLAY MATERIAL.
FOR DRAINAGE DITCH 1 & DRAINAGE DITCH 2, THE RIFFLE STONE DEPTH SHALL
BE Z AND THE SAND/MULCH MIX WILL ONLY BE INSTALLED UNDER THE POOLS.
9 A=LONGEST AXIS(LENGTH)
B = INTERMEDIATE AXIS (WIDTH)
C = SHORTEST AXIS (THICKNESS)
ROCK AXIS DEFINITION (RSC)
SCALE: NTS
MIN. 12" DEPTH V
SECTION D -D' - RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
SCALE:NTS
NOTES: - SEE STRUCTURE TABLE FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH DIMENSIONS
- FOR TRIBUTARY 4, DRAINAGE DITCH 1, AND DRAINAGE DITCH 2
THE RIFFLE DEPTH SHALL BE Z AND THE SAND/MULCH MIX WILL
NOT BE INSTALLED.
W
Z Z
RIFFLE D B
SAND/WOODCHIP MIX 12 IN. L)
12 N.
CLAY LAYER-
(APPROX. 1 FT)
PROVIDE MINIMUM
ONE KEY -IN
BOULDER
EMBED FOOTER BOULDERS -
SET CASCADE INTO GROUND A MINIMUM OF
STONES TO ENCOURAGE 2' FOR THE CASCADES AND
ALTERNATING FLOW 0.5' FOR THE CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLES
PATTERN
CASCADE PLAN DETAIL (RSC)
SCALE:NTS
SECTION C - C'- POOL CROSS SECTION
SCALE: NTS
W
m
IN
TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE
AT 21 SLOPE OR FLATTER
TIE IN VARIES
CHIP/COMPOST/
MIX
TIE INTO EXISTING GRADE
AT 2:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER.
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
CASCADE / WEIR
FOOTER BOULDERS
SECTION B -B' - CASCADE AND RIFFLE BOULDER WEIR CROSS-SECTION
SCALE:NTS
NOTES: SEE STRUCTURE TABLE FOR WIDTH AND DEPTH DIMENSIONS
j1 "11114,
SEAL
CD 32733 t
MAEl-
M `••
�111J11111111i.
RSC STRUCTURE TABLE
FROM STA.
TO STA.
WIDTH (VV)
DEPTH (D)
DESCRIPTION
TRIBUTARY 1A
148+94 149+02 14
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
149+18 149+28 14
1.1
RSC CASCADE
149+44 149+52 14
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
149+68 149+76 14
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
149+92 150+00 14
1.4
RSC RIFFLE
DRAINAGE DITCH 1
1400+00 1400+10 7
1.5
RSC ENHANCED RIFFLE
1400+21.5 1400+31.5 7
1.5
�ENHHAANCEEDDRIFFLE
1400+43 1400+57 7
1.5
RIFFLE
DRAINAGE DITCH 2
1450+00
1450+13
10
0.7
RSC ENHANCED RIFFLE
1450+23..5
1450+35.5
10
0.7
RSC ENHANCED RIFFLE
1450+47
1450+54.5
10
0.7
RSC ENHANCED RIFFLE
STONE SIZES FOR RSC STRUCTURE TYPES
AXIS
RSC POOL DIMENSIONS
B (INTERMEDIATE)
C (SHORTEST)
REACH
WIDTH
IN (FT)
DEPTH
(D)(FT)
BOTTOM
WIDTH (B)(FT)
SIDE SLOPE
(Z)(FT/FT)
TRIBUTARY 1A
14
2.4
4.4
2
DRAINAGE DITCH 1
7
2.5
1.0
1.2
DRAINAGE DITCH 2
10
1.7
3.2
2
STONE SIZES FOR RSC STRUCTURE TYPES
AXIS
A (LONGEST)
B (INTERMEDIATE)
C (SHORTEST)
STRUCTURE TYPE
MAX.
RANGE
MIN.
RIFFLES"
CLASS 1 (5")
CLASS 1 (10")
CLASS 1 (17")
ENHANCED RIFFLE`
CLASS 11 (9")
CLASS 11 (14")
CLASS 11 (23")
CASCADE /WEIR
2.0'
2.0'-3.0'
2.0'
' STRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE A MIX OF 10% 57 STONE, 10% CLASS A, 10% CLASS B
IN ADDITION TO THE SPECIFIED STONE
WOODCHIP/COMPOST/TOPSOIL MIXTURE
60%
TOPSOIL
20%
COMPOST
20%
WOODCHIPS
SAND/WOODCHIP MIXTURE
80%
SAND (0.02" TO 0.04")
20%
WOODCHIPS
ONSITE SAND MAY BE USED WITH THE
APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
Lu Q
� Z
(n J
O
Yz Q
Lu O U
LuQ
U of
0 z
Q cl) H
Lu
J O
< Z
LuQ
N.T.S.
RSC
DETAILS
f 5 OF 24
0
v
U)
F
I� Z w
w�
�r
0
Q
w
Q0
O
JWIX
uo W
a Z
m U
wlw
g
w0
Z
d
w z
J
O
w
w
Q J
Z
z
w
0
v
Lu Q
� Z
(n J
O
Yz Q
Lu O U
LuQ
U of
0 z
Q cl) H
Lu
J O
< Z
LuQ
N.T.S.
RSC
DETAILS
f 5 OF 24

REACHES: I REACHES
UTHC1 (TOP):
STATION 10+00 TO 22+81
TRIBUTARY 1A:
STATION 150+00 TO 157+95
TRIBUTARY 1:
STATION 100+00 TO 107+51
TRIBUTARY 6:
STATION 602+59 TO 609+80
TRIBUTARY 5:
STATION 1011+35 TO 1012+13
TRIBUTARY 8:
STATION 800+75 TO 801+07
TRIBUTARY 7:
STATION 701+65 TO 705+13
TRIBUTARY 8A:
STATION 804+45 TO 808+94
"C4b"
STREAM TYPE
TRIBUTARY 9:
STATION 900+00 TO 901+29
"C4"
STREAM TYPE
1 (TYPICAL)
�- �kfj
"C4b"
STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTSTIEBACK TO EXISTING
(BOTH SIDES) 1. GRADE AT 2:1
f T 1.8' 1.4' 1 1.4' 1.8'(TYPICAL) SLOPE
I 1VWkf1 _
--� t--
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 =THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS 9.1'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES) 5.9' 3.3'
/
IBJ
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 9.1'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES) 3.3' 5.9'
7'J
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH: UTHC1 (BOTTOM)
STATION 22+81 TO 27+39
"C4" STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS TIE BACK TO EXISTING
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
(BOTH SIDES) (TYPICAL)
r /
2.5' 2' 2' 2.5'
I I r r 11
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES) 12.6'
4.5'
2.3' ti
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
12.6'
4.5' 8.1'
I
I --I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS5.5'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS TIEBACK TO EXISTING
(BOTH SIDES) 1 GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
r T 1.5' i 1.2' 11.2' i 1.6' i (TYPICAL)
Ikf I
-�- -_
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS 7.7'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES) 5' 28'
14'
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 7.7'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES) 2.8' 5'
114,1
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH:UTHC3
STATION 42+32 TO 55+57
"C4" STREAM TYPE
REACHES:
TRIBUTARY 2: STATION 200+00 TO 200+68
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 6.3'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS I- -
(BOTH SIDES) 23' 41'
/
I1.2'I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 12
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS TIE BACK TO EXISTING
(BOTH SIDES)GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
L 3.3' r 27 27 r 3.3' (TYPICAL)
v _
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
16.8'
I'
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
6'
I /
r --I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
I"oIIt IIt#,,
SEAL
.p 32733
7 '•
NAIEL
'•=Z'l;NF1ra•C po,
-4, _2, 0, 4, $,
GRAPHIC SCALE
OP_�7 TOA
COQTORO Ty9` X92
/ O \
POINT BAR
LEFT MEANDER RIGHT MEANDER
TYPICAL
CROSS
SECTIONS
24
STATION 204+99 TO 207+63
TRIBUTARY 3:
STATION 300+00 TO 303+69
TRIBUTARY 4:
STATION 400+00 TO 401+51
TRIBUTARY 5:
STATION 1003+45 TO 1003+97
STATION 1004+69 TO 1005+86
TRIBUTARY 5B:
STATION 1304+05 TO 1304+38
TRIBUTARY 6A:
STATION 650+60 TO 651+61
TRIBUTARY 8A:
STATION 850+00 TO 852+63
"C4b"
STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
4.51
' TIE BACK TO EXISTING
1 1 2' 1' 1' 1 3' GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
\�
1 (TYPICAL)
�- �kfj
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
6.3'
I I
(BOTH SIDES)
1.2'1
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 6.3'
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS I- -
(BOTH SIDES) 23' 41'
/
I1.2'I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS 12
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS TIE BACK TO EXISTING
(BOTH SIDES)GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
L 3.3' r 27 27 r 3.3' (TYPICAL)
v _
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
(BOTH SIDES)
16.8'
I'
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
6'
I /
r --I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
I"oIIt IIt#,,
SEAL
.p 32733
7 '•
NAIEL
'•=Z'l;NF1ra•C po,
-4, _2, 0, 4, $,
GRAPHIC SCALE
OP_�7 TOA
COQTORO Ty9` X92
/ O \
POINT BAR
LEFT MEANDER RIGHT MEANDER
TYPICAL
CROSS
SECTIONS
24

BEGIN RSC
STATION 148+78
PYP.) SEE
DINGSHEET.
RIFFLE'. TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.-OSED'RIFFLE GRADE --7 '.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. (
Kl \ \
_
//149+rhro // 1 _-_o FLOODPLAIN TRIBI1
GRADING EXTENTS c
ff /' / // ii I - o O
61 p
NC
NAO '83
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
Irim— i
J
GRAPHIC SCALE
JI
,Ilyyfllflfll���.
SEAL •
= 32733
:7
:9 Amm
/1�'IIIIIIN+If'`
T/
-
-
/
r _ _Q\ \\ - - \
�
\ \\�`��\\Z,
-"� ;- ----
O
+0
+O
O /'
/
\
/ / \\�\
T1 &T1A
\\\po`
SHEET 7 OF 24
\��`_�
BEGIN \\ \\\\
� - --- -
TRIB 1A -_==-,_===== =�`
_ ' :\ y\�4\\`�\\\ SLOPE BACK INCOMING
RE -GRADE INCOMING
DRAINAGE AND STABILIZE
WITH COIR MATTING
WITH COIR MATTING
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.-
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
-J1
END
TRIB 1A \\\ \\\ \\\\ \ \ \
(1) 36" DIA. x 14' HDPE STREAM CULVERT—
-1FTEMBEDDED
(2) 12" DIA., 14' LONG FLOODPLAIN
CULVERTS (PEP)
r,\
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT' i t l/ l I v \
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
FLOODPLAIN
r PANMr, FXTPMT-S
(1) 42" DIA. x 24' HDPE STREAM CULVERT
- 1 FT EMBEDDED
(2) 12" DIA., 24' LONG FLOODPLAIN
CULVERTS (PEP)
0)
W
W
I - W
W
U)
S
{� N wo
11z Z 7N
w ma
O
Ow
W NU
O
Z
3 ZF
w
a V_ z
O
w J_
(Z') LL
w y
W
z
(n J
Y Z �
LLI O U
Q
U � �
�
z
pU
W
J (if j
--_- ---
- ---__
-
SITE PLAN
-"� ;- ----
REACH:
T1 &T1A
SHEET 7 OF 24
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 8

��tttitrrrrrr+!
vA A40
0.
SEAL
D 32733 t
• �w
NC GRID
NAD '83
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 7
SLOPE BACK INCOMING
/ / / / ll vv
PROPOSED LIVE LIFTI '.1 I
'.
DITCH BANKS AND STABILIZE
WITH COIR MATTING j
/ L/©x/�l
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. / / / / /
00/
/ PROPOSED'CASCADING RIFFLE'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
90�
(TYP.)
(1) 42" DIA. x 24' HDPE STREAM CULVERT-
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
- 1FT EMBEDDED / / / / / o
i-
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. / /
/I
\\\\11 '
(2) 12" DIA., 24' LONG FLOODPLAIN / ' / / /
rG --' / SLOPE BACK INCOMING
/ / DITCH BANKS AND STABILIZE
1111/\q//'
WITH COIR MATTING
CULVERTS (PEP)
W
W
o
to
v)
w
PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. ' i i�// -\ -- -� _ - '1
Lu
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. x =_ _
Z
/ _
,
FLOODPLAIN // O/ ' ---
GRADING EXTENTS END --
TRIB1/
START
UTHC1
BOTTOM
FLOODPLAIN BEGIN'DITCH 1' RSC
GRADING EXTENTS STATION 1400+00
to
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
I � �
1 1\ I
STABILIZE INCOMING
DRAINAGE WITH COIR
MATTING AND GRADE
BEGIN
UTHC 1 TOP TO DRAIN INTO UTHC
I I
I
I 1
I I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1
I 1
1 I
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
W
z
(n J
Y Z �
LLI 0 U
Q F
U � �
Z
<p U) WF
-
z
J
(if j
J O
WZ
of p
SITE PLAN
REACH:
UTHC
SHEET 8 OF 24
SLOPE BACK INCOMING
DITCH BANKS AND STABILIZE
WITH COIR MATTING j
/ L/©x/�l
00/
/ PROPOSED'CASCADING RIFFLE'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
90�
(TYP.)
PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
/ PROPOSED'STEP POOL'. 10
' Oxy
i-
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. / /
/I
\\\\11 '
/ /0/ ' /"
rG --' / SLOPE BACK INCOMING
/ / DITCH BANKS AND STABILIZE
1111/\q//'
WITH COIR MATTING
FLOODPLAIN BEGIN'DITCH 1' RSC
GRADING EXTENTS STATION 1400+00
to
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
I � �
1 1\ I
STABILIZE INCOMING
DRAINAGE WITH COIR
MATTING AND GRADE
BEGIN
UTHC 1 TOP TO DRAIN INTO UTHC
I I
I
I 1
I I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1
I 1
1 I
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
W
z
(n J
Y Z �
LLI 0 U
Q F
U � �
Z
<p U) WF
-
z
J
(if j
J O
WZ
of p
SITE PLAN
REACH:
UTHC
SHEET 8 OF 24

Itllllfl}+1f+►/
BEGIN TRIB 2-2 ,��.�P�le1 CAAto, .,
STA 208+98 `+� •.���.
SEAL
' = 32733
__ _ =Q
-- MATCHLINE- SEE SHEET 7 :'.
i %�'%'�=��_=_= �_-tj -_ _— _"==_. ___--=___,- O I I 1 I I I I I I I I:I I I I I i 1 i �' ' %� _'M�•'
t�
QAAEL �1\�
FLOODPLAIN
GRADING EXTENTS
4A \ 1 I
PROPOSED'CASCADING RIFFLE'.
\\\ \ , \\ \ \ \ (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
-- ---- CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-�
TRIB
\\\ \ \ \ \ 1 1\ \ \\ \\ '��• 'i.�`-�-_,_� ,/// / >� /�- � i IIII oA
PROPOSED 'STEP POOL'. \ \ \ \ _. /' O PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ J _% - �� (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
TR II2-1 PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. \ \ \ \\ \\ \ i:.�' "•�e.� /'7 "% /' ' I I I
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. �jl j I I I PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. \\ \ \ \ \ ` /I 11 II I I PROPOSED 'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. -40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
GRAPHIC SCALE
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
12
\\\ \ I I \ FLOODPLAIN --- __
(1) 48" DIA. x 13' HDPE STREAM CULVERT /' / / I\\ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ GRADING EXTENTS
2 12" DIA., 13' LONG FLOODPLAIN �// / / i _I? \ \\ \ \ \\ ` � --- N
DED
( ) \ 1 1 1 // / ,�O \ \ \ \\\ T'i0� __ —�i�-- —- \ F- Way
W.
CULVERTS(PEP) \\\ \ \�I ` I` \ \\ \ \\\\ Cossevi__--_-__— zco
�N
X.
PROPOSED'LIVELIFT--`i _�� *i \` \\ \\` - ``\ \\ -- �-� \ N 00
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. IIII( _ �i�� r �• v v v v-��-v / /' w wp
N vvvvvv vvvv -��.- ���� \ 1 I / I / //i, z z�
X11A \ ' / �� ��•.v v ��.��/' / �l l i / z
END UTHC 1 \ \ s / 7' • / / / / ,
o
BEGINUTHC2 k /�O /`_' - i. 1 / /"' / /i/ '//, w ��
Lu
END TRIB 3 `\ \ / / '�`-•� -I /' J' //i/''
\
\ z
BEGIN
\ \ O TRIB 3
I I I � I I I I I; I 1 1 �I IIII I I/111
I I l
� QA WETLAND'WC'
111 P5� F z
\ V I I I III I 111 l\\ Q• Y Z
O Q
111 \ iJ
�5�
,\
29+ �0
U
O z
vvvvv v vvv vvv vvv vvvl vvv � vvv � H
\\ \\ \\ W
\\\\\\\ \ \\ \ p0 J D
PROPOSED 2.5:1 BANK \ \\ \\\` \\ \ \ W Z
GRADING / STABILIZATION \ \\ \ \ \\ \`\\\ L p
(TYP. ALL GREY AREAS)
\\\0\\\\ I\ >t \ \ \\\\\\\
vvvv vv vv v ���vvvww�l�vvvvvv
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 10 jDArE, AUGUST 2018
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T2, T3, & UTHC
15HEET 9 OF 24 1

MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 9
+y�HCAR tiptoe"•` •r
piy \\\\\ R y \\\\ \ \\\0\\\` �► C •i
\\N\\\\ \ \ \\ `\`\ BEGIN : SEAL
32733
O 00 Z 1 III\\\\\\\ \\= - __ ��, '%,
Y.
o
L CD
BEGIN C5/
TRIB 5
III
III I' PROPOSED'RIFFLE
/hl�l\ II 1 GRADE CONTROL'. (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
// ✓l \\ \ \
III, J N\\\ t \ FLOODPLAIN
}I \ GRADING EXTENTS
(1) 30" DIA. x 24' HDPE STREAM CULVERT IIII \ \ \ \
l \ - 1 FT EMBEDDED 41r \ \
\ (2) 12" DIA., 24' LONG FLOODPLAIN MOI
o
CULVERTS (PEP) hn \ \\ \I 11 1 vpv v v -40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
\\\\\
p O EXISTING CULVERT TO BE REMOVED �IILv vvv v
/�v \ 00 GRAPHIC SCALE
ALL EXISTING DEBRIS AND BEGIN
WOODEN POSTS INSIDE TRIB 5A
EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED - ` \ - \ ` \\ \\ \ \\0
1AVAA111
111111
111 BEGIN 'DITCH 2' RSC
STATION 1450+00
O I 1 VIII\ IIII
o _ EM
\ONS
y ON
\ \
cV0—`\�—#\� G
END
TRIB 5B
d PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT'. \ q I I \ \\ \Q
\� \ (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. \
(TIE INTO UPSTREAM HEADCUT AND \ \I\\\ \ /I f\\ \ \
\ p DOWNSTREAM BED ELEVATIONS)
BEGIN \\ \ PROPOSED'CHANNEL
TRIB 5B `\,\\I\\\ 14 \ \ BLOCK'. (TYP.)
PROPOSED 2.5:1 BANK \ \ SEE DETAIL SHEET. -
GRADING / STABILIZATION \ /' lI I/�I \ _ \ \
(TYP. ALL GREY AREAS)\ +00 \ \ \
\ 11 ///III 1pp9 PROPOSED'STEP POOL'. 1 \ III \ SLOPE BACK INCOMING
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. \ _ \ DITCH BANKS AND STABILIZE
- O WITH COIR MATTING
I III \\\ 1\\ \\�� � O f I �\\\-• �
a v� �v END
EXISTING OVERHEADO/1�/� ,TRIB 5
UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED
OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
NOTES
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
b,\ \
WETLANDQ
WBS
PROPOSED'CASCADING RIFFLE'. \\l \
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
I
1�
MATCHLIN E -SE SHEET 11
V)
z
0
N
W
1--z
U) J
\� Z
w U
Q
U 0 O
z
<p U
W
J z
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T4, T5, T5A, T513
& UTHC
sEET 10 OF 24

MATCHLI
�••` It% CARO '•,� _ - _ - - _ _ - � NE _ SEE SHEET 10
�T.'•.• EXISTING BEGIN
IF
DRIVE ---- TRIB 6A-1
6A\\\-1
_ PROPOSED 2.5:1 BANK
GRADING /STABILIZATION
(TP. ALL GREY AREAS) ////q/
r/ �o-/
3733
--
�7.A'�' i \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ PROPOSED 'LIVE LIFT'. WETLANDQ
\ \ \ \1 - _--_ -- p (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
�' �I�I�C•-� BEGIN / \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ `o =- 'WB' A
TRIB 6A-2
+,��HA�� �P •••~ STA 650+60
?—\; \ \II'—III I
Io
}L
�l/I11
'i,//,/////// �i /i //�/ /i/'/// �i �� / ./ /�� // •�•• �i \ 11 ��I I I IIIIV A � � — —moi / c� —_---� / ///III / //. !V
NEW PATH OF EXISTING GRAVEL
DRIVE TO BE RE-ROUTED OUTSIDE /, // // '/I / �, o �' v :••/�/ rlTjl71 nlllllll 1111111 1 v �.� , �; -v ,r 1v v I I �O
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT. /'/ii /i // i i'' r ��•1 ;. i.. - 7 nlllll ulln \ a ` y�
/„ , / // •�•• / 1 \ ;•�• \ / � I 1111111 III 1 I ,— % / 1
INSTALL 10' WIDE GRAVEL DRIVE //r /i ' a, \ \ / /' / i //II ` ` \ '�\ ` �� 1 / END UTHC 2
WITH STABILIZED SIDE V -DITCH. / 11 , _ \ \� \ C� �o�'/ BEGIN UTHC 3
I 11111\\\11 V_/moi \ ���\��\\ \ \�•. �_�� I 1 1 III I
� '/ /// / '�\ _�_--- ___ __ __—_ � __ I \l\;;> L'O ��\\`\\\1\\ \ 1 •'���— 1 11 1 IXr111I I
- ��v vvv vv �11v111v1
END
BEGIN TRIB 6-2 / ---__- R(r rOl�j�S\ \ TRIB 6A
STA 603+22 , i - / ---; \CJ\ \ \ \\ \
WETLAND END STABILIZED EROSION AREA
ppx� 'WE' TRIB 6A CAUSED BY BREACHED LEVEE
1 _Og/ % _ WITH SEED AND MULCH
�C. i ! --" — PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTRO. \ \ \ \ \
P5 p0 /i-- L'EXISTING POND LEVEE
(TYPJ SEE DETAIL SHEET. TO BE REMOVED AND
RE -GRADED TO MATCH
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. NEW STREAM FLOODPLAIN �kk \\
FLOODPLAIN
PROPOSED'CASCADINGRIFFLE'. \\ \ \ \\ � - �" ` GRADING EXTENTS
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. \\ \ \ \\1\\ ;� Ac_ \ \
STABILIZED EROSION AREA LONG -
WOODLINE BY GRADING NEW SLOPE
AND TOPPING WITH SUITABLE \ \\\ \ 1 I -- ,
J'
TOPSOIL. SEED AND MULCH. \\\t \� 11 I I \ h5 � , \ �
(1) 30" DIA. x 24' HDPE STREAM CULVERT \ \\\� \\\\ \ 1\ �;-` �•
- 1FT EMBEDDED
(2) 12" DIA., 24' LONG FLOODPLAIN \ '
CULVERTS(PEP)
PROPOSED 'CHANNEL BLOCK'. ` ` •� �•
BEGIN (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
TRIB 6-1 INSTALL 10' WIDE GRAVEL DRIVE \\ �'•�, ��
WITH STABILIZED SIDE V -DITCH
FLOODPLAIN
GRADING EXTENTS
PROPOSED OXBOW
(FILL IF NEEDED FOR r"
GRADING BALANCE)
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
LL
pw
ZLj>
o�
0
52 w�
�z z JN
w mQ
w ¢?
0
�o w wv
¢ z ��
w
J z0
a w z
0
J
� i
w Q J
0
w v�
w
1--z
(f) J
YZ �
LLJ _0 Q
Lu I- O
Q
U G_
0 z
<p U
w Z
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T6, T6A
& UTHC
SHEET 11 OF 24

MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 13
.1►►►Illflillierr O / IIII 111�I
� LIV% ()AR rF, III IIII I
+� �L!A 1 /l/!J
.• . g / lam
co
/LU
hlI
SEAL •. z iili, PROPOSED'RIFFLE
' O j /// GRADE CONTROL'.
Q N� GP03 Q \ / Ill,, 4 // SEE DETAIL SHEET.
` �I I UU 11,11 l\ TRIB 9Lu
/ END (TYP.)
' �,•• 1 dip" �-�'co0 +6`' Ilil III I BEGIN
'rrr�j� `�•'�Q� ���
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'0 i111\11 1,UTHC4-2
iiii1i11111►►+
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED
16 -FT WIDE / 27 -FT LONG /-
BRIDGE CROSSING
PROPOSED'RIFFLEENHANCEMENT'./
TYP. SEE DETAIL SHEET. ///�1•I \ \i. I / /% ! l���
\
• q�•nvi����mo
'RAi��i�•Yr�
GRAPHIC SCALE
PROPOSED 2.5:1 BANK
GRADING / STABILIZATION
�I
REMNANTS OF • • •
(TYP. ALL GREY AREA)
//�i/ _ - ♦
NEW STREAM FLOODPLAII`�-
/
/ /. ♦ /
�1t
EXCAVATE APPROX. 1 FT
MATCHILINE - SEE SHEET 11
FROM POOL TO ENHANCE
k8�}/` \ O ;� ♦ \ /
0�
EXISTING PROFILE
7
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT'.
O-
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
6v-
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK'.
�� /% �' BEGIN
��
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
A
o
TRIB 9
sir/
V
/ / �
to r /
_ __ /
ZZ7
PROPOSED OXBOW___-- iiiii%/ - __, ;;—
ILL I F NEEDED FOR
_ %•_
_---
-''
/i-00-
GRADING BALANCE)
ENHANCE EXISTING
RIFFLE WITH GRAVEL
MATERIALHARVESTE
WETLAND
UPSTREAM
\ \ \ \\
PROPOSED'CASCADING RIFFLE'.
FLOODPLAIN 'ir
//� '� i
/ //
END UTHC 3
BEGIN UTHC 4-1 / \\ \\
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
GRADING EXTENTS
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
BEGIN
/ NEW PATH OF EXISTING GRAVEL
TRIB 7-2
\
/
DRIVE TO BE RE-ROUTED OUTSIDE
C) STA 701+65
+
.
\ ''
i � \ \ (�
\ %•
•
\ \ (1) 4.0' H X 9.0' W X 24' LONG
STREAM OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
o
\CULVERT
RETE
BOX)
0O ' - i£
/ ,O\ p > /
�\_ jl
\
1F EMBEDDED
IN (1) 36" DIA. x 24' HDPE STREAM CULVERT
(2) 12" DIA., 'LONG FLOODPLAIN
CULVERTS(PEP)
_ ----i-=•4 _.-
-1FTEMBEDDED
(2) 12" DIA., 24' LONG FLOODPLAIN
CULVERTS (PEP)
FLOODPLAINGRADING
BEGIN
7-1
EX\
TENTSTRIG
-
END
TRIB 7
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED
16 -FT WIDE / 27 -FT LONG /-
BRIDGE CROSSING
PROPOSED'RIFFLEENHANCEMENT'./
TYP. SEE DETAIL SHEET. ///�1•I \ \i. I / /% ! l���
\
• q�•nvi����mo
'RAi��i�•Yr�
�I
REMNANTS OF • • •
MILL DAM TO BE REMOVED
AND GRADED TO MATCH
NEW STREAM FLOODPLAII`�-
�1t
MATCHILINE - SEE SHEET 11
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
0
H7 rn
Lu
0
N~
z Z =N
W U) a
U
w N
ciz
�o W NU
^ a z p'T
Lu
J Z o
d LL 0
0
w J (�
w Qw
Z LLQ
w e�
W
F z
U) J
Y Z
W 2 U
Q
U [)f of
O O
pLu F
W _
J W' D
J O
WZ
Y
DATE: AUGUST 2018
Sc E: GRAPHIC
SITE PAN
REACH:
T7, T9
& UTHC

VA 7-/0
i-
w FASF
-Z MFN71
c o
o
w \
e�
r�
z
CD
I
co
o J
Q p
NSFRVAT
/OAl
FAgFMFNT � � ij / J I Irli � ,6. �
00
�a
w
z
PROPOSED 2.5:1 BANK
\
GRADING / STABILIZATION
\
(TYP. ALL GREY AREA)
z 0
j
a
oz
It'
BEGIN
UTHC4-3
STA 63+75
J CJ
1
/ I
I
/I
I / /
LLJ
W
y
EXCAVATE APPROX. 1FT
FROM POOL TO ENHANCE
EXISTING PROFILE
x
/
/ PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
(TIE INTO EXISTING GRADES)
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
/
/
/
(1) 4.0 H X 10.0'W X 24' LONG STREAM
CULVERT (CONCRETE BOX)
-1FT EMBEDDED
(2) CULVIERTS (LONG FLOODPLAIN
EXCAVATE APPROX.1FT-
FROM POOL TO ENHANCE
EXISTING PROFILE
BEGIN
UTHC4-4 -
STA 68+55
J I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 �
l f oft 0,1",
SEAL •
lip! 32733
�,1yAEIL ..•.
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
Z
0
U)
S
N
e�
r�
z
'm a
I
w fn
o J
Q p
o o
�a
w
z
wv
w�
z 0
j
a
oz
I
co
w
J CJ
1
/ I
z
LLJ
W
y
x
LLI
CO
_z
0
V
ATIONFASF4�
END
UTHC 4-4
w �
_
LLI
0
Lu
of
CONS
FRVATIpN
j FASFM
AUGUST 2018
-U: GRAPHIC
I
/ /
SITE PLAN
REACH:
UTHC
I
/ /
I
SHEET 13 OF
24

NOTES:
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE
FILLING EXISTING OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS.
HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL TO BE STOCK-
PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED
MATERIAL, ENSURE THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS
ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING WATER AND NO
FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
•i`4441R41RRIRR�+,,
o
�
Np
a3
SEAL
32133
�QINE•
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80' ',, '�/ Q'
CNAEL �'.�•'
GRAPHIC SCALE
w
0
g
PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK'.--\PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'.
w
a
z
O
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. (TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET.
r
/ FLOODPLAIN
GRADING EXTENTS \\ i l \ END TRIB 8-2.
TIE INTO EXISTING STREAM
PROPOSED'CSCA(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SDIEE RIFFLE'.Zu
\\ \\\ \ \ \ __ o>
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL SHEET. 46
// ��i� i i �� / I I I tlp/ / //� / /•�,r I // ��-� r,•i'•� �\ l III UV
BEGIN TRIB 8-2 iii / � � � / � -_ /Y >> � •r v \ I I z�F
STA 804+45 / jicw i //i i- - �/ /r• 'i y \\
/�x / / \ END
// /i \ I \\ TRIB 8A
Oox
O 1 30" DIA. x 18' HDPE STREAM CULVERT F w^
%=i-/ / •�'?ll\� _+� \ \ `� - 1FT EMBEDDED �� z Z �w
iii�����ii%iii/6��--��_ �'•�l /� \\\= ��� \ \ \ \ '..`=� I\ I, (2)12" DIA., 18'LONG FLOODPLAIN o v a)<
CULVERTS(PEP)¢�
iiii�i���/if ��_ �1\ ��� \\ \\ f �� \ _ O�
/ \ \ \ \ \ p K �Q
w w0
z �x
\ \ \ 5 Zo
O
w
/
____ WETLAND WH - w v
WETLAND'WI' \\\\\\\\ \ y \
O ////3 - 1
G /// // \
\\\\\ \ \ 1� j- ---7
WETLAND 'WJ'
_ \ \
\\—
v/�//xa/ WETLAND'WK \\ II \ \I I LLI Q
cn
Z
w 0 U
✓/i - BEGIN LLI I- _
TRIB 8A of
�o °
Wz
BEGIN J D
TRIB 8-1 J O
INSTALL'STEP POOL' AND Q z
'CASCADING RIFFLE' AT HORSE LLI Y
WATERER / HEADCUT. TIE INTO o
QA WETLAND'WG' EXISTING STREAM. }
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T8 & T8A
15HEET 14 OF 24 1

964 UTHC1 PROFILE
960
956
TIE INTO
EXISTING
CULVERT
952
948
944
940
936
932
928
924
rn-' a---'--
M,s M
--'--'--'--'----'--'--'--
, ,
2
M --
=
:
--
----------r---------
-
-
-------
-- -
---- __: -----
__: --
-- -----------
---
-- --
-----
--- --
,v : a
_--+ -2--'--
+, +
O,zo z
- - -- - -- - - - - --
-- -- -- -- '--
-' --
-
:
:
-
-
-
:
- -
:
-
-
-
--N
--
N
-
:__
-
:-_:
-
:
-
N
$ w
WU
-
M
--- '
--'--'
--;-
-'-
N.
_� _�
-'- ---
__� _�
--' ----
_____�_____�-____r_____�_____
____________
__________________________
__________________________
i
____________
__________________________
NW i
1>Yl
J4 P
:
O
µ
-
N W
z
n M' m
- •a
--- p
-W iiJ
w >
m
s p -r --'+'m-
+
N
'w
O
m ----$'ti+--.-
O -'�-- -
Q
a
�
a
16+UPJ 17+UPJ 18+00 19+00
20+00 21+02
----- - -- -
- --- - --•
--
F'
->--rn-
- ----a
W'
----- - -- - --
9
f -.-d
9
-F.--
z ui n
- z,--�D-rn----•-
z
- -'--
N
-
-- -- --'-- -------'--
--' --- --
-----'--:__�__:-------
--'-- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
- - --- --- ------
- ---- -- --
- --- -- - ---
-- - --- -- ----
-- ---- --
--`--`----`-------'--,-
-
I ^`a
- -- - --
y
T
w a
" r:
m m m
- -
- --
-
- ---
--.--T--
- ---
- -
\.
---W-.--.<
¢
�>
o: +z
Q h -'--•N
: : : :
NZ
:
'4 '4
> JW > JW
y
1i
r
+
9% ;�
'o
��
ry
'-
4
-17
---
- - "4-
-
r
-
-- ---
�ii
> .a
0.
• �H
Q
- -
o N
- -
M
Z N
--
- -
-- -
- -
- --
-
- --
-
- -
- --
-
--'--
- -
-----------
\
9
w -
W
v----6.
a d:
J --N-
;a '�
a k
- �N .0 ---
°
-
-
N.
---
--
M
m-.-
- - -
- --
M �
��
I
- -
I'
-
1
- -
'(
1
'a
__'__
- *-
_
- -
-',
�
--
;--,
- r --•--
- - ---
r, .r
'� a
-----
zn'
F�
Z•M
mrd
'2'-
��-•--
--
NN ---
. .oi
�v
M -
- --- -- ----
- - - -;- - r - - --
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
-- -------
-
------- --
---- -- ----
------------
_,I-
-
_
-------•--
-----------
- -
--'-----•--
-----------
_�
m m m
M
.
,2
z
c5
,.-
N
_ F
N-1-
N
I - - I
_
'
F
r
N
r
> r
<
a
��
O
---
¢
a w
Q, -
: ;
r I , r
, r _
O
--•--•--�'N
•a -
--rn-z
--
--
_
F �F
o
�____
a2 :
m
M-
rn,
N
f ' 11
�P
I -1 -fl
" ��ro-�-�-
I
-
Z. -#.z
--'
- - --
��'- _>_
___ _��
----
F _+�
- I�,z
r -
_�;_M
I I
____________
_______________'_____'__'__
-
__________________________
-
____________
__________________________
--•I -
¢,¢
m+
*•_-
o --
I
o'o I
____ __
_,1_,i^,\ ___
____,__ __
:�
,
-'>
rW-`-
-;
�; N
, ,
-
-
-- -- ---
u�' -- --
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
4 .� _ F>' w
¢. -.
F H
-
¢ a¢ a
F F
I `�
rn. +
z _rn
I
I
W-
y-
--'-*
'rn-
�-----7- - -
W F.
-------'---'--
a
--- ----=--
m
--
-----
-----
----'
�'- -
------a
_
N -
----,--•--•--
4
�->. W-.
7 W> W
to
¢.y
¢
tri
rn;
1
--(
----
-- - -
1
4
.>
W>
W
----
--N',
>. -F.
¢
--.Q-•--•-ro
N.
rn o --•--
1, ,
-------------
:
------- --
: : '
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
------
_1 -- -
-;---
-
> 1
>
-•--_
N
-
z�;
QN
zp, --
v
--- -
_•__�
-__•____�/_-
•-
__
c----•
- --'1
w' -
m-�
w
__ _•__._^
m m
^, a.
z rn'--�-
-� z
M, N
ro•'ro m---'--
- -�--'--�-_:-----
---- -----
+ rn: - --
5m
-'
- --
-
-- ----
/\>
-- --: --
,w
w
a;
->'
W'
w•--• - --
ON.
p.
5--' -
Q
z. .r+o
--
O'- -
.z
N 'O -o-
2 -.-
'a- --
Y
---- -- ----
-
- - - --
- --
- --
---- - - ---
---- - --
- --
- --
---- - - ---
---- - --
- --
-7
a 'w
-� �W-
H
W ----- >w
I.,- a Wa
F M
_>---_•-- -
.W
N zQ
F -H-.--_
m bN
- N
c--
N
W
m
�:-
'\-
-
.I
F
m,
a'
>,
- i
J'
-
F
¢
p.
-
M
b '
y W
b d. W,
'
m¢
a'
* rn +'
N r
rn.
2,
,$
n h
n \'�
-
I :
a
>
1
W
w>
--
P.
-
:.
w
4
rn ¢
-'-�
d
-
---- -- - --
- - - ---- -------
---- -- --
---- ---- - - -
- - - - --
.
- - - ---- -----
� F•
�•
a.
as
o N c
��
¢
p
11. 'F
�.
: >:
w:
a.
w;
: m
W' l
z .
Q: :�
.rn
o
Y
'>
•w
a :1
> w -
>
Z,m>
_�
-' --'
___v
-' --
ern':
- '�a
n,
---
rti N'
���i
•r+a
- -
.+d
z�
°'
--
-------- -------
I
- -
'1
1� - -
Q'pC f.•
- ----
4
>
d
-
n1: r
�.
¢. .Q -
-
�o 0 -
,rim rt-
-----
--------
--
Yv X.
-------- -----
--
------------------
.> W .Z
--- -
�>
J
W>
w'
-------r----------i
zA'z
-------r----------i
o �
o
R2,
F
/ V
¢� W.
: W
W. .�
a
w
M�
M'R
M'
i �-
_
�� �
.F t-
-
a
w
�i.
A.
;1
________ __
.a
-
A
o
rt
EL ____
af
--'- - -- - - - -'--
-----'-------------'--'--'--
-
------- ---------
---'- --
- --'- ----
W
----- ..I-
W
.> >
W
---�---- W
W F
------------
--
~'Q.
_
---- W
mrn
-
- ------ --
-\' I��,J
-------- - -
------ --
------------
F
--
Q �
-
WW
---
- --
�'�
-
-
--- - - --
tp lO
---- -- - ---
--'--'--•--'--
--•----'--•----'--•--.--'--
- -
-----__'--'----
-
- -
W>
-
--
- - -_
_
Q
r.
Q
Z�-x-'-----'--
---- - -
N ,
�
- - -
-
- - - ---
w`�
4
-
M
-
Q
W--
- --N._
_
Omit
z -A
I�
- -
m
- --',_ P•'-
4
>
>�
W. Q.
�Q
H v
Nv N
'/'
>
W
w
y<
F
m Z
Z
--' ----- - - -' --
-----'-------------'--'--'--
-r- --------
- --
- - -- ----------
--------
------------
--------------------------
- --
-----------
----------------------
-: W-
-
>' �
W
W ro
---------- +
�
°�' 'Kn
rn'+
- --
ZO �
rn
rn -------
ZO
---
Nin
!'
--------
N
\
-----------
------- - - - --
j
-----
w m W N
- - --
> W
>
4
---
m
----
F m
-------
a
0
- -
- -
--------- -
--
- -- --
-- -- - '- --
- --
--- -----
-----
-----
------------
------
W �
--,
-
---
O N
.O �
-- -
------
- - -
--------__
>
- -- A.
� -- -
� 'N
----- -
i -
--- __� --'----
•-- --'-- --
-7_'.-- --'--
--'----' -------
__--',-----
-----',-- --',-----,--
--',-- --
,h
---- -- ---_
- - -
W
- -- -
r�X:
--- -
"Y
- - -------
b�
--- --- --
--
-�- -- -
-- ---
-- ---
>u,
-- -- -
-
__: --
--'-----r----------
----r--
--'- - -------------
----r--
,
'4t4
O.
-.�
.O �Z�Z
-
rn:o'
--'--'--`--'--
--=--'-----'------
'-------
--------------------------
------------
--------------------------
--'--•--•---
--------------------------
I
--'--'-----
------------
------------
Q• Q : a
- ,> -----_
-'1 -
F w
---------
of :6 of
-
-----
----
--- ---
\'
--- -----
--
-- ----
--
--'--•--•--'--
--•----•--.----'--•--'---__
•--'-
--`--__ --
-.--•-' -'- -
- -
---•--'-'-
- -•----'--'-
- --.- -:
-- --
- - ---
--- - ----
-- -
- -- ---- -
--- -- ---
- -
- ---- -- -
- -
W'> a
- --- -
_
.111 W - ---- -
o�
-
-- --
- -
O -- -
- -
-
o
- -
mm �
- - -- --
- - -
- - -- ----
-
--'--;--:--:--
--%--'- -------
- -�
---TT--�-----
--------------------------
r
------------
--------------------------
--------------------------
------------
--------------------------
-------------
u §.
y -----
--- Q
- -
Nr m m
------------
-----------
-
a;w
w
^
m�
�, �,
- :
-�---
- -�- --''
- I-
.w w
-- --
, Q O� O
--
, +. rn:+
rn
---- -- ----
---- ---,-------
-- '-- ---,--
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
--,-- -- ----
-- --,-- -------
,-- -- ----
-- ---,-- -- ----
-- ---- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
-- ------- -----
-- ----- --
> >
_ ��
--- d- -
o:.
-
-- --- Q R "Z
F
-1--m-1
----------'--
-----'------------�--'--�
------ --
-- --'--
-1- --- ' -- ---
---- - - - ---
- -
- -----------
-- -----------
- - ----- -- ----
----- ------
-- -
- -
----------
- --
--------- --
----- - -- - ---
- --
----- - - ----
----- - -- ----
> W > W
- -
----------
M. . ' 1
- .
-- - --
------
- -
L-�
-
>. w.y
.y
10+00 11+00
936 UTHC1 PROFILE (CONTINUED)
932
928
924
920
916
912
908
904
12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
fill 11 Oil,,
•�H CAF? ,iff
�6P �ficss►p • ��
QR" .
SEAL
_ 0 - 32733 t
- 7 .VZV1
.�7;4-..Z
,` o
•�
fN
N
r -.
't�,�, fir• —
1 . .
","T' NAE1. �1,�` c �
1
�Illllllll1311
------------- -- -------------------- -- -- tW
N' Z
d ti[
}.rn. v
7,w
W
N N
rn', p-.- v 'm - �� �----; - -- 0O
F
m'�'-- ¢---'a-N- - z `-� --
- ¢.- m rn Z.--
> W. r O�'-- v "m aV
•- ---•- -- - --�-- - W
. . �< � � 0 �. z 2
Q � Zd . 11 .<
'_-
a
F
;/ . 1> wTi; - w
'\\
--- -- --- - r --\
m� -- ., r am
N. .--'-----•-
-Z'- - N m -'- - --- w- , -y,-- N W.
--- NQ N r-- -- - --- / r {{�� F =n
I m 1� z
m�
P ---'- A+ -. -- - WjM M:--
- --t- --. '��- ff W f=4¢
O �
¢�---- zrn'z -t - o U oz
mm ,.
r-
2
M --
- -- - ---------'r--'---.--
----.--r-
--
----------r---------
----
W...........
-------
---.--.- --
--------------------------
--------------------------
- ----- - --
------------------
-------
�6
Via.
------- ---------
- ' - �'_ -•- '-----
�- :-----
•- '---' •
�- : -- ; : ---
;-_;
- - '--' --
-- ----
.�.W.
..,.
;4�6.>....
Wa
-------
--------------
--N
--
N
ON
¢N
O ----•--'
-----
K
-'N
-- -- 'F
�Q-
a
N
$ w
WU
-
--'--'--`---------------7.
--- '
--'--'
--;-
-'-
N.
z M
O - }C N
W
-
------
i
, , , ,
z
.
- •a
--- p
-W iiJ
w >
m
s p -r --'+'m-
+
N
'w
O
m ----$'ti+--.-
O -'�-- -
Q
a
�
a
16+UPJ 17+UPJ 18+00 19+00
20+00 21+02
----- - -- -
--------------
w
o z
---------------
----- - -- - --
]ill]]
------------------
--------
J (!I
-----------
---------------
-----------
.>
" -
Z
I
w ¢ r- --.-N
�z
gyp-
W
K
O
mm ,.
r-
2
M --
- -- - ---------'r--'---.--
----.--r-
--
----------r---------
----
-----------------
-------
---.--.- --
--------------------------
--------------------------
- ----- - --
------------------
-------
------- ---------
----r--
------- ---------
----r--
.N
::-rn
- - '--' --
-- ----
---- - ----
-- ---
-- ---- ---------
-------
--------------
-- ----
- ---- -- ---
-- ---- -- ----
---------
- -- - - ----
- ---
---- - - ------
-
-------
--- '
- -- - - -------
-----'--
?
'N p O
N.
z M
O - }C N
, , , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
, , ,
- •a
--- p
-W iiJ
--r --- �-u~�. -JN
.
m
s p -r --'+'m-
+
N
m N
N
Y1 ---.N
m :�
4
O
m ----$'ti+--.-
O -'�-- -
--------
--1,�
------------------
-- - -- - --
---------------
----- - -- -
--------------
------------------
-- - -- - --
---------------
----- - -- - --
------------
------------------
--------
---------------
-----------
---------------
-----------
.>
" -
-_- a
-
a.
--` - -- mo
w ¢ r- --.-N
�z
gyp-
n
� 'z':--
----
--ryry--•--v--
a
--`--'--
--`--`----`-------'--,-
-
- -- -----
- -- - --
- -- -- --
- --- -----------
-- --
- - -- --
-
- -
- --
-
- ---
--.--T--
- ---
- -
\.
---W-.--.<
¢
�>
o: +z
Q h -'--•N
0----N--p--•--}--
NZ
4
--n
r
N--•--•--
--•--'--'--•---
�-
a m
w -
W
N
-
w w
Q
y
m:K
--'--
- -
-----------
\
--•--
--
> ----- b
v----6.
J --N-
-
a k
- �N .0 ---
°
-
-
N.
---
--
M
m-.-
- - -
- --
-
- --
-
- -
- --
-
- ---
- -
- ---
- -
__'__'__
-
__'__
- *-
_
- -
-',
�
--
;--,
- r --•--
- - ---
r, .r
'� a
-----
zn'
F�
Z•M
mrd
'2'-
��-•--
--
NN ---
. .oi
�v
- - -
_:_-
- --- -- ----
- - - -;- - r - - --
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
-- -------
--------------
--------------------------
------- --
---- -- ----
------------
-- ---- -- ----
------------------
-- ---- --
--------
--'-- ---------
---------------
-------•--
-----------
--'-- ---------
---------------
--'-----•--
-----------
m
m m m
N---
.
.z-�----�,`
m
--'N'ZN
-
rn
Z'--
O
--•--•--�'N
•a -
--rn-z
--
--
-,--'--'--`----•
�•--'--'
-
%m
^ - -• •-1'--
- - --�
a �. H: �_
W�'W '-
Wf~/J
.
,------
•-O
Z. -#.z
TM
----,--f
�-
-h.F'--•--•
----
•--•----•--
- --
-
- -
- --
-
- ---
-
- ---
-
--•I -
- a tr
__ -----'F
*•_-
o --
___ __________
____ __
_,1_,i^,\ ___
____,__ __
__ ___ ___-
---
-'>
rW-`-
-;
�'
¢ __-- --
-
-
-- -- ---
u�' -- --
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
--,-- ---------
--,----,--
--,-- ---------
--,---- ,--
_�
-
W-
y-
--'-*
'rn-
�-----7- - -
a&'ti-'---'--'--
-------'---'--
--- ----=--
- - -
--
-----
-----
----'
�'- -
------a
_
N -
N'-�'--------
z,
m
N-6' �-----
- - -- - -rn '�---'----------
------------
---------------
-----------
-----------------------
---
--------------------------
4
.>
W>
W
_>
N
Z
Z rn+
'rn a
a ro.
\
EL.
y.
w. >
w m>
F¢
w+. rn
v ,6 .v
N m
--'--'--'--'--
-- --'--'--'-------
W :�.Q
--� -
>
C � � O
----- -
> F
.O
F --
+ rn: - --
5m
-'
- --
-
-- ----
/\>
-- --: --
,w
w
a;
->'
W'
w•--• - --
ON.
p.
5--' -
Q
z. .r+o
--
O'- -
.z
N 'O -o-
2 -.-
'a- --
Y
---- -- ----
-- ---- - ----
-
- - - --
- --
- --
---- - - ---
---- - --
- --
- --
---- - - ---
---- - --
- --
-7
a 'w
-� �W-
H
W ----- >w
I.,- a Wa
F M
_>---_•-- -
.W
N zQ
F -H-.--_
m bN
- N
c--
N
�' �N
rNl--
'\-
-
F
m,
a'
>,
- i
J'
'¢
j--.--rN
'H
:>--F-Q-:-N
N O 'r
.Z ;U
.Q ��-
-
y W
_> _ cD
W
m¢
a'
* rn +'
N r
rn.
2,
w>
--
w
------
w
-
w
w
4
rn ¢
-'-�
d
'a-= -
w
---- -- - --
- - - ---- -------
---- -- --
---- ---- - - -
- - - - --
---- -------
- - - ---- -----
Q w
¢
p
M ZM
M
Y
'>
•w
a :1
> w -
>
Z,m>
-- -- - - -- ----
------ '------------------
-------- -------
-------,---------r----
-
.1 a,>W �;
E --r----
Q'pC f.•
- ----
c
--
d,#
-
m
--------
m:
Nm
N -
--------
--
Yv X.
-------- -----
--
------------------
.> W .Z
--- -
------------
------------------r-----,--
-------r----------i
-
----,--
-------r----------i
-
----,--
��
¢� W.
N ' �In ?
N
o N
ZO :
M�
M'R
M'
i �-
; W
________ __
______
_____
EL ____
af
________
-
__
________
___
____________
________
__ ___ __ ________
___ -
____________
__________________________
__________________________
__________________________
--'--'--'--'--
--'--'----'-------•--'--�'--
----•--•--'---
.
-•- •--•- - - -
- -. • - -•- -
-•---- -- -
- --
---- ------ -
- -
_
-
w>
--
- --
w
- --
0 -
F
O -
- --- --
c4i
, ,
v
- ---- -- - -
, , , N
-
- -
N.m
---- - -
N ,
--- - ----
- - --
- - ----
- --
�`
---- -- --- -
,;`
, , ,
- --
- -- -- -- -
, , , .
- -- ---- - -
.
- ---
--- -- ---
-------- - -
--- -- ---
- ---
-------- --
'
4
F--
.
:
:
I .
--
- -
---'--` -
- --
----- --`-
--�
--�
- -
---- --'- -
-r- --------
- --
------------ -
•__'_ __ -
---------- -
-_._ •__'__
- --
------- -- --
----------- -
- --
-----------
--- -
, >. wD w
----
- --¢
N aN
f-`- ---.
a. i
m
-
a:s
zm
O:F
w ----- -
z
-- o
vl ri
---- -
-----------
- -
r MK M'
----------
- -
- --
-------
------------
-------
- ---
--------- -
- -
- ---
-- - -- -
- -
--------- -
W>
W : H
F :
z0N
z0
+ rn+ w
---- -- --'--
------- '--------
--r-- --- '--
-- --- __� ----------
---- ----'--
--- -- -----
---'----------
,----- --- :--
-- ---'--- - -----
----- -- --
-- --- - -- ---
-- ---- ----y
a -•N
a-------
-�
F.a
F- -
- - --Z'-- --
---- -- ----
-- --------------
__: --
--'-----r----------
----r--
--'- - -------------
----r--
--'--•--•---
--•--'-----•---
I
--'--'-----
-- - --'- --
I
-
-� -�
--• '-- -
-� -�
I
--
-
-
-
-
W: -W
1 W- EL
- --
W W
N aN a:
_
Wa *
-
-
-
- -
-
- --- __�__
r
4
> >
- - -
r
-- r
2U+UU 21,00 22,00 23,00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+UU
W
I- Z
(n J
�
Y z
Q
W
U
NW H =
LLQ �-
U [)f Of
O
� Oz
I-
0 w> -
W
J 0f j
_j O
G Q
Z
W
O� 0
' ^H'
VJ >-
PROFILE
UTHC1

888 UTHC3 PROFILE
--'- -- - --' -- - -'--' -----'---- -- ---- -- ---- -- --- -- ---- -- -
884
--' -- - - --' -- ----- '-0 ----------- -
--- --- _ _ _
W.
880
--; -- '- ---------
T,
-`---- -- ----'- m' -- Q W
> w;
876
--;- --; - ---;- --; --- --;- -
872 e-
e e
o. o
868
o_ .a
--
' --i --` - - ---------
864
- - -- -
864 -
860
W
m
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
.i.
+.m
m +
N
. . . .
852
--r -'--e--
Q
Z6
--;-------
-
-,------ -
-- ; ; ; ;
41+00 42*00 43*00 44+00
--------------
----,----
-- ----
--
---- -- --- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- --
------- ----
W,
•a-0
4
7-z--'--•--•-
- -
w
a
---- -- ----
------------
------- ----
�; O; F
O
------------
N
a
J
r¢
w
¢.
856
.�-Z.-------
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
C O•
—
o
m +
N
. . . .
852
--r -'--e--
- -
-
--;-------
-
-,------ -
-- ; ; ; ;
41+00 42*00 43*00 44+00
876 UTHC3 PROFILE (CONTINUED)
872
868
864
860
856
852
848
844
51+00
? e
\ O Z
m °
r _
.�-Z.-------
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
C O•
—
o
m +
N
. . . .
I\
--r -'--e--
- -
-
+
� m
-a z -v- p--
- -- - -----
m,
--------------
----,----
-- ----
--
---- -- --- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- --
------- ----
m ^
-+,-m,-
^
`A--
4
m'
- -
J 4
>
------- ---- --
---- -- ----
---------
------- ----
�; O; F
O
W
N
a
J
r¢
w
¢.
>
O--'-----,-
r:r
Q
-',----'--
z¢ .meH
O
z:
�
�
. r.
-m.- r
,
- --
-
a;
Hme
-
w,
a
F.
o'
z
z'
>----
> w
w
¢
m
a
-_a.�
yow
p
z;
W
a
o----
--f -;m
W --- ---------
-
--
- --
--
------'-
---- --
- -----------
----
--- ------
N j ---N-�
-
-------
--
-------------
V•.
----------
F
;
O •O
r
r
ZOO
---------
-L --------
m
; ;
;
_
-- -----N
P-4
=
----�
m
N---------
'
---
- y
�;
-
'- --'�
-'�N
----- -
`e°. z;`e°;z
o.¢
.o-
;o;Q
-
z
4
k
------------
- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----------------
------ -----
-
O•�
-,W
r r. ¢
m d
>
W -----
a a'
z m.
Z2
z
ur $
« m +
- ; ;
; ; ; -
? e
\ O Z
m °
r _
.�-Z.-------
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
C O•
—
o
m +
N
. . . .
I\
--r -'--e--
- -
-
+
� m
-a z -v- p--
--- --a Z-;--
-_;--
---;-�
F F
m
+
-
r----_
N m
N
ap
sma c_mm
ze.Z
Z.
- -
J 4
>
-------
_
;
w
--a----'-_'-
>
r•
0
W
N
a
J
r¢
w
¢.
>
O--'-----,-
-----------;
EET5)
-',----'--
m,
_
? e
\ O Z
m °
r _
op 0
ZHCAn,
•. •.
10
ti
_ SEAQ. � —
_ 32733
i
9'
■
•
■.�'NAEL 46
r
.�-Z.-------
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
C O•
—
o
m +
N
. . . .
I\
.
. . . .
N.
---
-----------
- -- •---i-------------i
_w;
N .
'.Z -----------0
r
�--T
or (p-rn
m
+
-
r----_
N m
N
ap
sma c_mm
ze.Z
--------------
mm;
..ZV
---------
Z
-------
--------------------------
- --,--
EL EL wd o
0
O, e
F.
N
z
. aw,a
--_J-
Nw _
>
O--'-----,-
-----------;
EET5)
op 0
ZHCAn,
•. •.
10
ti
_ SEAQ. � —
_ 32733
i
9'
■
•
■.�'NAEL 46
r
yy
> >
w w'
k1
45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50.00 51.00 52.00
.
.�-Z.-------
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
C O•
—
o
m +
N
. . . .
. . . .
.
. . . .
N.
>
W
1
_w;
N .
'.Z -----------0
r
TR
Oo R
m * m.
a
1
+
-
-------
yy
> >
w w'
k1
45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50.00 51.00 52.00
.
---'--'--`--
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
o mo m
dramg --
. . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
.
. . . .
N.
z�
eua wN �,d
a
m
_w;
-----
+ om'o
a
1
+
-
-------
O
-
N
O
-gib
N
¢
- ----N
--------------
+ + m
-------------------
-----------
--
--------------------------
- --,--
EL EL wd o
0
O, e
F.
N
z
. aw,a
--_J-
Nw _
>
O--'-----,-
EET5)
-',----'--
m,
_
g
W'
a
n' z
16
>----
> w
w
¢
m
a
-_a.�
p
z;
W
a
o----
--f -;m
W --- ---------
-
--
- --
--
------'-
---- --
- -----------
----
--- ------
N j ---N-�
-
-------
--
-------------
V•.
----------
F
;
+ ao-,--•- --
- 'Q
-'----:-
---------
-L --------
--------
_
-- -----N
P-4
=
---
'- --'�
-'�N
--
---`------
---'-
�
------------
- ----- -----
-----
-----
-----------------
------ -----
aW
O•�
0,-----
r r. ¢
m d
>
W -----
a a'
z m.
Z2
z
ur $
« m +
- ; ;
; ; ; -
-� �� 7
-- - --
> > Lu-
W Lu ------------
�-
ra;
ar
F.
--`------
zN
z
i
wa,
w'
S a¢
r-
�',
a �; ,`
it
--'- --
•--'---•----•-
•--" -
-� �'
w --•----.-
.-m sG
o. a
--- -- ----
w
Ino. n-uSOi--•----,--'m
�r
--------------
-- ---- --
--' --' -
- --'------'--
---- --
------- -- ----
---------
------- - --
- - -----
-
------- -
PC
---•----•-
•--'--•--
----•--•--'--
y --•----•--;y
> ww w;W
7 y
--------------
-- ---- --
----,-- --,--
-------,---------------,--
--,, ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
---- -- ----
----------------
j
-Z -
--------------
------- --
5200 5300 5400 5500 5600
960 DITCH 1 PROFILE
956
952
948
944
940
936
932
9>0 DITCH 2 PROFILE
916
912
908
904
900
896
892
- ©---- `--'-----
or
---'--'--`--
8 -----`--'--
-- ---'----- ---
o mo m
dramg --
-'---'--•--
r �o
e Z+
.
-
a F
y
o
>
z�
eua wN �,d
a
-�O'---- --
_w;
-----
+ om'o
a
1
$QZ
�
da< 0'e
;--'-----
v
Ja ¢
¢
> : w;y
------- ,'--
yw-, - -- --
aw-'--'--`--
+ + m
JR9Cor-'--
CSCE T 5)
- --,--
EL EL wd o
0
9>0 DITCH 2 PROFILE
916
912
908
904
900
896
892
- ©---- `--'-----
or
---'--'--`--
rn
zoo9
.
-
Q IIeZ
> W d.FrOo
m,wrdM
— m +
Je
ci -
o�
o. J
+ + m
e 7 e 0
r�r> ...
.-'o
EL EL wd o
0
O, e
F.
o z
w
°
. aw,a
--_J-
Nw _
>
O--'-----,-
EET5)
-',----'--
{� cn Wo
^Z Z jN
LL w N¢
co �Z
V00
U Q� Q
ti w wU
¢ z jF
5 Zw
a Wz
0
ir Jm
w ¢ J
z O
z
w v
W
I_ z
(n J
Y Z
W CJ
Q H
U � �
2 '0^^ Z
QvJ
W
J � z
J O
Wz
Y
<
W }
PROFILE
UTHC3

950
TRIBUTARY 1 PROFILE
-------�--:--
--�--:- :--:---
:- : : : :
:o.
o.
.`y1j11111l1if///�/
t H
946
r ON-o
zo
� •oN
o' .N
AA_Q� �'
• V
w ¢
- I
r
_
o. c
m Dim
rn Ili
e
?
''
'F
0-2-�
QF
-
-
"°°gi''v
-
-o'-----'--',--
i
a"�W�w""ori>y>:
.a
:w4'...:y
po
Oo
"`D'o.�
--- --
---- -----------
-------
------- -- ----
--------------
-- ----
-- ---- --
---- -- ---- --
SF..IIL
942
mw./.l.
- :\ :
:
> ,w>
w: :-
wr"
d Q
r
r
Qr
o
7
Z'+
o o
rn: o
z .
.:
:M
;o
�"
32733
..,.. ,.
,.....,..,..
,. .I,i
...,.
_
?
w_
wa
D.
r
-
j¢
F
p.o:z
-:2-A
+
'm
:z'N
N' m
rn '�'rn-c�','N
o
�
----�-----------------------
--------------------------
�
o
'-1
\.
.I
-
a
wy
�-
j.'F
¢:
.
.O
o z
o m
N �
V:.
�
� �
� � �
�
� �
� �
�---�
::
::::
�
Z
-.:.-:-- .:.-'-
is
-
I
a"I
-�
w-a
w' m
�-----w.r.a..�.F.�
>.¢:F
p.:.,
A +
M rn
'
:9'•.
o
938
;o o
b
:
: : :
-
:
.
:
:
:
..l
I:
.'\>
:
w' ?
:
w:d�
E.
'm:>
-
a
w
:w
d F
a
m
o z o
�a
_
r d
Q;
z o.
p
_
r M
�°
w 1
N� w
.
IM
!_I.
�����
II//[[Y���'
n
w
V M
V M
O
N �
O
:N ,
:
1 :
: I
:
:
> W
., m
W
.
w <-
o o
0
-
_ _
+' +'� rn
rn
m- O
o
y+`��
,!,,' N v. i��`
/
o°'-,6
zz `ern
ai 6-'ai
m:.':I;r
4
l,,
�•
^\'
- a. -�
>•w>w
� -
`rn>a
+-
-
-z z
p_�p
r F
.'?- ' w
.n-
�
- .-w-'I
.I,.
11 I N
IIL11
-
:¢
.•r.
r¢
¢.r.
ro
d.-.
p'�o',�
F - _-
.rn
.O
,°,n°
cdm
�N,rn
'om
o
...
..934
-- /:
..
�...
a
. >
........
-
-- �.-
- ...>
N Suri'>
_'w_' w
:Z:
-.p.:a
_.
z.+
N^�°''E
q,+�
rn:cy
..
.....
.. •..........•.....
•...•. ........m
_
w m
W
>
W r
a r
:Q
Z
ZM
�.^b
e
orn o
O
> w
F.Q `
o z�,p.
-
Z
Z �..^.._..•..
_
��
m
m
�
>
7...
�.
�'
w.�..W
.�
.F.d
m
r
y
r�
.¢ r.
>
z
.O -
.F ..
a
O.. .w`+°.
µ
m..c
r
^
o
smi .+.
`,c°..
m
�
I I ...;.
.\..
....
/`m
�� \
w
-
W.
y.��a'ar
w
•r.
Ilj
a }�..N.rn�m.N
�
ED
ao....
a �
N.. . M
+ rn� ^m
M o..
N
'�
.o.
N
.....
....... .......
.. ... .
w
¢
.Q ¢
r
Q ..
2 Z.
z o
•z • S
.. m
.. voi n
r,k
1-
a m
/
\1 ....
....
.. _>
w
..
_'
a�
W-
Q'
w y
..
Z O
p
Z
F
o 2' «
N
a, ....
,c
IM
m
. ... ....
.................................
..'......--------'...'..
: : ::
�.. �....
: : :
_
�a
:
w
_w.�
:
w
w.. .afro'>:',,->v~i
d
_
.¢.;. o
e
.Z N.
�-9
9.
\_...
...w-aI
Q
r a
>
-
r ¢�. .d
F
0..��"O.
._'_' 10
v-m�
"rt" i2 :�:
930
Lu �a _
8 _
o
N
.,..,. .
w>
w Q
r
r
a r
,¢
- p
a
m�
o
.
. ..
> a
W'.
rn J
w
m
>
w
I
z
p m
o'z
F'^
rn *
O"'O
Z'O
:
+;�
'7'
_
a
J¢
w_
a
a
r r
I mLl-
1...,
\�
'
> w>
W
Q
-
r
5�:0:
a w�
>
o"'
a�
zo
-
..�.
�p
w-�
rn
,
....
_ _>
..
r
...
r.....,
z.o
X
�.O
.. .0 .
.ay
t6
..
..,..
. ;..
w
..t
w
�"
:.....�..
-
, .. �...�. .
..�..�..,
926
: : : :
: : : :
: : : : : : : :
: : :�
_
O
_
rn
m
of
id
w
..'... .'....
.....
..I I.. .. ..
a
.W
.w..
. In
>:y
w,
,
J
o'�
z V
z .o
o
Z n m
O w w
rn
�. r
n
-
\
.\
\.
^
..�.. �..: ..•.....:..•..:..:....
:..:..•..:.. ..•...•..
_
_
__.
W.
�,
W.n
W.. N.
j.O 0:
..,.
o,.Z +.
.Z.
�,..
:..
.
o...
.\ ..
•..
�
rn........
QW
• -----
-
w.>
w .,a.
.a
d
ori
�.
m
r;0�.©.
_
.N.
_
......
��
N
a�
NM�
Wo:
N:
:II
U
Z>
922
: : : :
: : : :
: : : : : : : :
: : :
>
>
u >
_ w
_
.:....:.......:.
.....
..•..
-"1.w%.
0.
.w. _�N
Q-
W.......
..�F
p
of
%N
_
m'
^ s
^
-
: : : :
: : : :
: : : : : : : :
: :""�
..... ....
.....
,m
¢h�
�u
a.
>
m
...+ ..
+. i...
N•NN
.
N
�
OQ
>
w
>
_ w'
�
z
918
; ; ; ;
; ; ; :
: : : : : : :
:
F aF
a'
Q:
a¢
°
Olu
F
--�--
--
914
..•.. :..: ..•.....
. .
..•.. :......
, , , ,
:....•.. ... ....................
, , , , , , , ,
, ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
100+00 m°
q�
101+00 102+00 103+00
104+00
105+00
106+00
107+00
108+00
F
o
I
�;�
oo
Wo
I gz
O
O o�
s-
uy� F
!� z Z
w.
�N
966
�a
.a
oz
oz
TRIBUTARY 1A PROFILE
o Q
o?
'av
1a,
'1�-W.F'¢-Y¢--
- .
-.DI
-..:..:..'.....
,N w
aJ
0o
..'..:>y1.
.
1
I.
m>
..w
w>.N
..'...'..:..'.....:..•...
�.. ;..
..,...'..,.....
_ _..•...�
g fn
O
ALL'
Q
"f"
a
>w
-w.+O'p00
-a.rrn
�>w.em�u'o
m
coo
00
a
^m
w
¢ Z
W U
m
w 2
962
II
-Q�rn�rnxocl
'reaazI.-T.
�cJr
-�•
:;
�o-'s
-.
m--
.-
o o-•-
o
:
Z
¢
a.
w r
z�
O
:yI
__ ':r"
:a¢
Q:Fwz�zo
�:
p�
p
+'m
- z-o
rn
I
1.0 `'
I
I
I
pz
m2
'--
Op,
eN
-..
O
e'
.I -
-•---- -
m>m
-W_WFa+Qr¢
>Tu>Wa"a
a�w>m>
Far
3.
r,
.m.
F.,.
a
F..
__
-
N
-d
Q
"
"C'
..+
N•--g•--
O
O_
N. :
__ _
°':�:w
__ __
:
-- --
- --
- --
- -
- - --
--
- ---
W
w
J(D
J
¢w
N•
N�
r
.. "
"'
4,
'>w?w
->;
_
W> II1..;
/m,>r
..
4.i-
r,¢�
a,W. 14.:1--��
F _
rn
+.
�� .,m'
.m.N
..;.
.'. ..
'..•.....:..J�o,
ZLL
�_
> w a
w {
�'z.
��
�
wvFaF-
"qW-rn
}�.,+
mZ";_-
:.�
.�..
.I.,.
k
�.
1f�'
4A-•
Q
F'-
Q
- I :.
��.\.'
a' I
,. a�.�
Mo
.N
.�...�q.
-
w
W
'F
cimob
+
Wz
,'
m
> EL
>�r.,Q
W•
\.
Q.
1.
�ay.
n'r.�
N.
w
.¢
.�..:..:....r
F
.
mw-;"�n
a
Sim
A
...
,�
a.
.:>..11l"":,�
J a
�
Y
r
'7"
'c' O
:'a.r-�O'
,(5
Z.
'm'a
rn
rn.
a-
-`I'-
954
-
-
vz�I
W
r, d
a
F.
o, N
�
m
.>
...................
;QFa;Q
.-r
4F
.� ambumiti:mii
-m
:m om
-.r .�
o ...
.,..
..
....
.
....
> w
✓-:
. a' J
'->'.w
m
.Q.
w:
.w
'3
o w
r.r.0.
z+
�rn
rn
--o : - "
wwr
¢ a 'r+
mmm
zez
N
lu;'
m,-
oo
NmN
o
m
>
_��
w r
a
>-
- m'z
r�
rn
rn
--'--`--`--'-----`--:-a�a'w-+..ar
>w>
m>m>�o�o
¢-a
--'a m+,
m z�
z,
w v-w
m'mm
6--`--
w
- --
- -'-- -
�-
- ---
--
-
a.�
--
--Q.-.--
----
a
-
+:9
-
:c'-°°`--`----,
ci
m
W
Q
. .,...-.-:........,---:--
..
_w_w
a-�a
>w>
.F
-Qp
,
.F
r.
p�
..... ..
> a�
p.
F....N
Q
+ ern+
z.
o
z.....
..'.
.o rn.
ono
.0 .�..
.,,,
... .... ��.....
.....
'>
•w
w a-
.a.�
: >
w¢.a
wa
.>
.¢..6
>
.+
_F
zv+
z .
O
..+.,.e,�
rnm
w....
��.....�.. ...
...............................,........,..
—
950
m>
..
;�
.
_
�'z+
J
a'
w�W
�,
- >
w'
J�
1O'
a
W-
¢
w--i--
4
-m
m �
�.
m.
'm m
+-
�'m
r
---:--'�--
--`-'--
F-F
-
w--.
r'
u,
a
- ¢
+
g.m
i+
N
d'--�
rn
N-2''b--------------'--'----'--'--:---:--
--'---'--'--'-----'--`--'--'--
y Z
O
�
wa
W
d
pd
•o
_
oA
z-•
w-Q
n'
��
w
a
��
-�
Z
.-
e
W
U
=
r
m>w.>�
¢ r
.¢
�9
F�Qr
bo
-: a��
>
W ss
w
aFQ
o.
mz.+
moo.
z..
fO o °�_
—
W H
946
-
-- -- --'--
--'-
awWa
_
:w ',mw�Nw
zuwi
z'e'��+�,
mwm
_
w:
.�n
H¢a4
mrn�gi
'm
'o
Q
..:........:...........................:..
RSC (SEE:SH
ET.5)
:..
..:...:................�
_
>
W>
......
r Q
am
F: O
4... Q'��-F��fl-F--�--�-
.;a
. e.
0-.i
o.
ry
.��.. $. .�N
rn
�.�.....>
>
w
_
>, w:
a .w
w...
m>)
W ..{a-},
O r O
}„�
m-
r.
:z
.p..
+
,m.
`° o+
2...�
o
m
M.
m
:o
mo o ........
.... ......
(
U o
cc
of
O
Z
----------- --------------
------------
------------>
r.
w-. m�--'--
-- -
`"'•-z.
n
�i+------�_--
-----
---,-
---
---
----
- ----
wi .y
---
¢ ¢
w�wF
•m
.
-d-F,`-
O: I.-
¢
a--
`�'i
.m-m
^'�
m
---------------
-------
-------
-------
--------------
--
G ---
Q
}_
_ _
a'�
'>�W
d
'
�'
r"O
Zvi
z
O'.m'o
w a
_
a.
u _
_ r�_
m
c
z
r
•z •+
o, •
�^.�
Q.w...>.-
942
: : : :
: : : :
. : :
: : :
.r
r:
j'. ¢
-
r d
r
->w
_
:I
'>
w
�r
�'a�
Q m:
z
rn +m'
: v
J 0'
......... ........
...�...
... ...I
_
_
a
_
a'
m
� _
w' E-
>m
w _
�a
w>
>
w '
�
w
m
•-'
em a
rnw °�
zm z-;
• I
o'
N-e.�
"'
v vi
o
o
-
-- •--
- � -•--• _
_
_
a
•--�
WI-
_
a
>-w/�
w
'� _
QQ'
u� r.Q
Wh.>-
_
F
O �
r..
ad
z•
p l` °'
_
�;- •� z-•-�'-o
�'--�----•--'--
0
�--•----
�--•--'---'--
-
J
—
�
O
U
: :
: :
-'--'--
------w
• ,Fi
-- �'
-N.,
z -------
"'o
�i v
d�'e_
'm -
- --- ---- -I
I•
--------------
------
- -
---
J --
-- a•
J
r
-
Q o'
----- _---'z"
>'
w'ar¢.
----------------------------
-------------
Qd
W-
Z
_
-'
: : : :
: : : :
: : : :
- -'-
: : . I
I I :
: 1
a
>�
-
�
�
6.
rn m rn
e, ,.,a
.
,.I •.
r
w.•..
a W
•
rr
wNF.
-r
Ow938
O
_
j
w
w
Q
Q
.O
,mn .z v
2•
v .m c�
17
m
1
(
>.
w a
WO...
�....
:.. :....
:.. :..:--'--
i)
>-
I;w�;w4
�I
M
-----------------------------�-
_
--' ---i
W
J
•W
r r
fA m
W'
m �
Z
�a�o'�z
Z. +
o
-
-':--�--�-':-----
:-':-- ;":----
;-':-':- ;..
..:..
--
-
•
_
z
_
\,
-
934
: : : :
: : : :
: : : :
:
Q
ry
r : :
M:
w q
Q•
r. r
O�
e-N a
"� .'
r
m
r
m.
Q
> K
w. y>
r ¢
y
r-
>: `+
�n N m
m+ rn
rn;
1
NN m
m
6'vi
N
N
v
Dale AUGUST 2018
scnLe 1"-40'
930
a:
>.
w.;. -
`a
w'_
1a
w
w-•'
w
2-,^„ z-:-
O� O'
+•'`V
+
z^
...
--- :--,.--•--:--
--•--'- :--•---
:--•--'- :--
I
- '
I
I
.
I
I
�
d� ¢;
a:F
`m'
PROFILES
-
4
>
�a
W- W--
, >
_
--
, a,
W 21
� `a
-�
T1, T1A
>,
w>
w
926
----'-- i--:-----!.
.. .'i----
; --;--:--,--
--:- - --
--:- --i--
--:----
r:
149+00 150+00 151+00 152+00
153+00
154+00
155+00 156+00
157+00
158+00
SHEET 17 2E_24

964 TRIBUTARY 2 PROFILE 944 TRIBUTARY 2 PROFILE (CONTINUED) 944 TRIBUTARY 3 PROFILE
'lll�ll�lf+lllrr -
�H Ap •,
960 940 940
•. -.
SEAL
956 936 936 32793
8 =�
s7 • r N
rn
Z
=�!
fN
♦ n
9 52 9 32 932 '••,��N • • ` �1 ��.`� L
11 11
1---------------
948 928 iO
928
944 924 924o
940 920920
Ov
o Zj
936 916 916 °w
�N
OZ
[]
p Fa
da
932 912 912 U
Z�----------------------
928 908 908
20000 201 00 205+00 206+00 207+00 208+00 300+00 301*00 302*00 303*00
{� co w
`J Z z N
LL w cn a
U
W N ¢o
W NU
Z IIF
TRIBUTARY 4 PROFILE TRIBUTARY 5 / 5B CONFLUENCE PROFILE TRIBUTARY 5 ENDING PROFILE TRIBUTARY 5B ENDING w
924 936 908 936 a 'z
W 0�
------------ ---- ------ Z W ¢
920 932 904 932 W�
916 928 900 928lz
83
7------ -------- -- Lu
912 924 896 924 cn o
- z
Y
--',-- --,--'o- --- -- --',-- LU O U
Lu
908 920 892 920 \ Q ~
-- - --'� N N -O -;N
C
\ +
- ---- -->wm-a-J -- LLI 10~
904 916 888 916 >
> J
\.
-- 1--•--.--- < Z
LLI —
Y
900 912 884 912St I
G .m
------ -- + rn+-yi2
- aa Gl LL
O
z
--------
-----M.O M_O �
',--�- •- -- Q m
896 908 880 908 m' w
>: >
- ---- --------- --- --
_ _ _ DATE: AUGUST 2018
—LE: J"=40'
892 904 876 904
PROFILES
T2, T3, T4, T5
888 900 872 900
400*00 401 *00 402+Z0 1003*00 1004 -ZZ 100500 10Z6,Z0 101100 1312.00 130400 SHEET 18 of 24
�mNm
0
ozoz�
N
d
- Q Q
m>Ui>
O,
1- -
<-
---
oz
6 v M
924
oz�
Mm
�m
; � �
_o yo
¢OM V-'--
Mp -4Zµ
z
�a'
-------------------------
-.-o
--------------------------
>.a:
------------ ---------------------
NaaFSzo
t-
'
O
d MaFaF
O
r• ro
m>m>tn>
W -W -J
a J
m rn '
o-
_
I I
m
1.
\'
wN' �Pa
aJ
�,�- �
> a--
>W+rn+rn
I
---- -NO�O
'moi
--,----,-- --',----,----
�ci
joy
oy
iaJ a�
w w
I
;
m
,
�z
J
m m
M O,g
rnf
rnrn
+
M
'
_
6 v M
924
oz�
Mm
�m
; � �
_o yo
¢OM V-'--
Mp -4Zµ
z
�a'
-------------------------
-.-o
--------------------------
>.a:
------------ ---------------------
NaaFSzo
t-
Q M
O
m
P
a J
m rn '
o-
_
I I
m
1.
----,-- --gym
�- ��
�,�- �
> w
---- - -
---',--
--',-----,-- ----
--,----,-- --',----,----
-- --',-- --,--
--
o-meqq
z
vp
;
,
�z
J
m m
M O,g
rnf
rnrn
+
M
'
_
rnN>
W>
W~
f N
f
>Wd
Q
,m >�4
O Z
MII+rn�tO
m
........... �__,
-
m
a J
> w
Mrn
t
> J
�� ��
N.?�
'2
+
Nm
Z _
zr m
0-�----
w y
-- ---- -- --
o o
z
I�1
7 .a
Wm>
g
F.o a+g��..'...
bai4N
:ai :cri
¢
¢
,.�.-
-'-con .z_._�_^��Z
m
�.
rn:arn
I � m >
r a
cum
--•- --' --
icy -`4----------
--
-
--------
-
-rn---------
MQnZ
w
J r_
_
N
a wm
J
..'.. �..�.>. w..;F
Q;.. +o ...
;-� IT,---
-y�arnwm--7
pp
7-2411,
J Q
rn oaoov
o
>.W
y.
LL
p..
Q
\
�I
Mrn
Q oz -
-- --
-
m
- w_
J
m,m
I
4f�
--•--��-----�--
--!--•--��--!------
f -Q -
t -a
F•N
A!
_
-N- - ri-�\`/�--•--
- '
a �.y�d
rM.OM.y
a
>
J H
a Z
m JQ F
- -
: : :
: : : :
: :
O;
Wj W W II
Q
r
'
a
6 v M
924
oz�
Mm
�m
; � �
_o yo
¢OM V-'--
Mp -4Zµ
z
�a'
-------------------------
-.-o
--------------------------
>.a:
------------ ---------------------
NaaFSzo
t-
Q M
O
m
P
a J
m rn '
o-
_
I I
m
1.
o +M• foo
: :
---------
> w
---- - -
w
1--
0.0
so
N O
z o,
.1
vp
;
N
o�o�ppzr�'
m
M O,g
r
a ¢
_
rnN
mo. I
ra,*
wtn >
rn
f
>Wd
Q
,m >�4
O Z
MII+rn�tO
m
........... �__,
-
m
a J
> w
'm
M:
> J
HMP
td .Oo2
N.?�
+
Z _
zr m
0-�----
--- --� -w• ju
-- ---- -- --
IIS
I:
I�1
7 .a
Wm>
g
F.o a+g��..'...
bai4N
:ai :cri
, V
¢
,.�.-
-'-con .z_._�_^��Z
m
�.
rn:arn
I � m >
r a
cum
J
1...
MQnZ
w
J r_
_
a wm
J
..'.. �..�.>. w..;F
Q;.. +o ...
;-� IT,---
pp
o
z ,
O ai
y.
LL
p..
Q
\
a J
Q oz -
J
0
�
a �.y�d
rM.OM.y
a
>
J H
a Z
m JQ F
: : :
: : : :
: :
O;
w•
Z .}
r
N
W !Fa-
>
a
----
ca+rn .
; � �
_o yo
¢OM V-'--
+
z
z
-
-.-o
.z -:o
>.a:
o rn
-j'
a OV r
m
P
a J
m rn '
o-
_
I I
--
I I
1.
�
---------
> w
---- - -
w
1--
m>oz oz
_wvp
c
z o,
.1
vp
;
J
o�o�ppzr�'
m
M O,g
r
a ¢
_
o F
CL LL JaOv
mo. I
ra,*
wtn >
rn
y
m
a J
> w
'm
M:
> J
+
Z _
0-�----
--- --� -w• ju
-- ---- -- --
M A
b
> w
v
F
; � �
+
z
z
-.-o
.z -:o
o rn
H •a
H -
---------
c
z o,
z g
rn
;
J
y
_I. I
a J
> w
'm
M:
+
--•- --�
0-�----
--- --� -w• ju
-- ---- -- --
M A
b
v
m
�.
I � m >
r a
cum
J
w
J r_
_
a wm
J
o
z ,
O ai
F
a•
J
0
:>
; � �
z
z
-.-o
.z -:o
H •a
H -

gOg TRIBUTARY 6 PROFILE
��.�►►►■■ee
�H A
904
row
WQ
•7
�L
900 _ 32733
Ll 2L
-T
z
9 '• o--GRADED TO 0
896 +
•
e W
/ -Y`EL
892
888 cl
884ro
LLW
OU
Zj
880ow
=Z
EO
O¢
876 UH
z
872
0
N 7m
a w�
�y r
z Z �N
W U) Q
868 p : <�
602+00 603+00 604+00 605+00 606+00 607+UPJ 608+UPJ 609+00 610+00 � a y O0
W yU
¢ Z �F
912 TRIBUTARY 6A PROFILE 884 TRIBUTARY 7 PROFILE a zo
Lu
WZ
0
� JV
uj
Z aim
908 880 w
904 876
Lu
z
900 872 cn Jo
Y Z
Q
896 868 Q
U
O
g (yz
Q 1:1 Z
892 864 J
_ O
U
WZ
Y
888 860F_
}
884 856
DATE: AUGUST 2018
ecA 1"=40'
880 852
PROFILES
T6, T6A, T7
876 848
650+00 651+00 652+00 70100 70200 70300 704+00 705+00 706+00 SHEET 19 OF 24
0
Z
M N ^
In O ' M
x
\
rn o
w � EXISTING OND;LEVEE
p o z ; TO BE; REMOVE©AN©
> _ __ � W - ---- ---------------- ------- ___'__--•--
- > �� NEUV ETRE RIF FiOODP IN
oa+
I'
� � ;aWvr>' dF�po
n nn,N
m w Nin,
mi rcr'ac >w, Wr-¢dr 'm aoe ; � ; ,
J N mN,W s
m
me �Nw - __;_� ___________:__ __�_____� ____ _____�_____�_____�_____�_____
w ,\
�_m ��___rY _w''n �-E-- - __' - _'__ - -__ -- m Fse p.n •iOl�;r_- - ___________ __________________________ __________________________ ____________ __________________________
z$ z.Two � m
ate' Q' 4 Z;�*a z>wa__ __ ____ -------
>
- - - - - N y-W�---m �-a �__
W
m rn
m O
W �
W >-
o z�
I� o� o wN dr'.�:
;F ¢4 z � : ,a y>� z. :+m m• '
Q 9' ; � a
' a W W O z.
m w + +' m Om1N � r�
m �
a' d z'+
W' m
w aG N 'ko
, > ;m O m O a m,e m r
_ I I I I I I I
Tara o'zezmoo'. �z.o " M�
� _ 5'
w � a
f
1
m >. a F
z
am'O
y.W
p�
a m.
W � F ,> Z
�
----
�
N -
wd r
a-
a Wm w;
> w ;
Z
�
--',--
w-� ��-��',--•-
'-----
-- ---- -- --
--�-----r--,-�-w.y
;
J;rn
_a �^ z�
O' m
-z'- -
OA-------------
-� -N �
>�
me
Qr
a '>
W�o�'o;�,z
'
M M
-
r
IL
?; ;
w�
> ozoz
w
---- --- --------
-------- --------
--------
-- ----- --- ---
'
mM
iy
I >; w>
w
�'�
----I�
�-N
--- �
dry
i
--
; --'-
; -
� --= -
-----------
3
qo
/
yd
¢r�
Z
odo
m
�'wr
W m
> w
�w
d
O
�
�
�
------
-------
-----
¢ o .z
Z m mor
m
� d
o
,y w
Ed-
¢',a
m+•�$°+°
ui is
�
_
---- `"
I
b
---------r----a----------
------------
--r------------
-----------
--'--,--•--'--
--•--'-------------•--`-
;--
--; -'a
j;
w--,--��, -a
Q
--o.
"z6 o-
O-
--•--a
=-g
---- ---
I
----,-----`----
-----'-- ---
-- -------'--
-- ----,-- --------
W,a
w
z-------
� �;I-
j
J V
`a a.
z •O
z '
w._
w
------------
------------------
--------
---------------
-----------
------------
--------------------------
> W;>
---------------
-----------
------------
---------------
-----------
W'r9
H
¢��
O �
-0
z o'
m.
z + ^�+
°'
.y
w y
w; a
m
p
� z o a
_
j' Ll eii
Qaa
coi
_O'
>'
w >1a
W
'
F�
a;
j
w•
o'
o
�,-
w�w;�p;�.O;
^
z
z
�
;
11
Wa
!�
� �O�O;
of m�
umr viva
wm�m
,'1
a�
; >
W
W
F Q
F;
03 m n
Iri
�>
>
y
wIN
w
w � a
f
1
m >. a F
z
am'O
y.W
p�
a m.
W � F ,> Z
�
----
�
N -
wd r
a-
a Wm w;
> w ;
Z
�
--',--
w-� ��-��',--•-
'-----
-- ---- -- --
--�-----r--,-�-w.y
;
J;rn
_a �^ z�
O' m
-z'- -
OA-------------
-� -N �
>�
me
Qr
a '>
W�o�'o;�,z
'
M M
-
r
IL
?; ;
w�
> ozoz
w
---- --- --------
-------- --------
--------
-- ----- --- ---
Z
�
�
�
�nnN
iD �
p�
io
'r
Qr
M M
?; ;
a `aWnpnp
> ozoz
'
mM
iy
I >; w>
w
�'�
----I�
�-N
--- �
dry
i
--
; --'-
; -
� --= -
-----------
3
qo
/
yd
¢r�
Z
odo
m
�'wr
W m
> w
�w
d
O
�
�
�
------
-------
-----
¢ o .z
Z m mor
m
� d
o
,y w
Ed-
¢',a
m+•�$°+°
ui is
�
_
---- `"
I
b
---------r----a----------
------------
--r------------
-----------
--'--,--•--'--
--•--'-------------•--`-
;--
--; -'a
j;
w--,--��, -a
Q
--o.
"z6 o-
O-
--•--a
=-g
---- ---
I
----,-----`----
-----'-- ---
-- -------'--
-- ----,-- --------
W,a
w
z-------
� �;I-
j
J V
`a a.
z •O
z '
w._
w
------------
------------------
--------
---------------
-----------
------------
--------------------------
> W;>
---------------
-----------
------------
---------------
-----------

868 TRIBUTARY 8 PROFILE
++qty
•
•
864 `
�L
860 Q 32738
i� i N
%� Z
Q
:.• •-
. N
Fr• —
856 ' • w
P.
N L
•
AE
852
848
844
ow
OU
z�
840 °W
>Z
00
F-
>
836 u
zg
W Car 0
832
0
a
W W.
MSI
z Z WN
W fA Q
828 N a�
804+UPJ 805+00 806+00 837+00 848+00 849+00 �/ < � O0
�W wo
¢ z �F
864 TRIBUTARY 8A PROFILE 872 TRIBUTARY 9 PROFILE ga z
N o=
W J QW
C) K
860 868 W
856 864
W
Z
852 860 cn o
Y Z cc
W U
W
2
848 856 Q
H
U Ocr
0 Z
0 Lu H
W
844 852
J
O
U
z
W
p
840 848 }
CO
836 844
DATE: AUGUST 2018
SCALE: V=40'
832 840
PROFILES
-------------------
T8, T8A, T9
828 836
850+00 851 +00 852+00 853+00 SHEET 20 OF 24
940+40 901+UU 902+00
-f—
_•__ __�__ __ ____ __ ____ __ __'__ __ _____'__-- -- ---- -- ---- -- ---- --
m,osz � o I
opo
�m
m >�
r Q
> W. -
Wra ,damp+ ,
au
-wra
a
e' m
rmm
m
�� -�
w'
_ w
a r _
0-z-
------
moo.
r ¢'
O W
o,
QO
O
-
--` s - uL
m--:
-
--
------------
--•- -• --
��W-•-N'�d �---•*mN'n`-'-mom
rn
---•-
-- - --- --
--'-- -- ----
W
O N
--; -;- :-SIJ-
•- \-'--Y
;a y,u
a•�
a-'-- `ic'-�-
a•
m �
,
-
m
ZTom
,�N7
O; ropu°*i z
1,z),'aD
m v
\
�
wmo
ra
o
a
-
r .F
1 i `
N.
;
mw ur w
m0 m O;
m
rp
z
m0
m0
r.
--
--
Via; �,
-'--�
-- ----'--'
uQi�`m
a r r
m
I
4�;a
wm. w'
m
m
>J>J
m +
m
� �
o z o z;
;
z
o
typic
+
t
m
zo
z
m.'m
dtom__,_
,���no �
;
w.
w
F,d
r �
�w
.d
mp',*�
z.
--'---- -- --
-----'---.----.-
--,fir
w
w��-�
aimI��
m AN
- - -- ----
- --
-- --;-1
--
- �r-.-
_-
--- �
a; -y a --------
-- ---- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
ul� - ,-�'�
O,m
-�--rn .fir ���_______________
________________________________________
a
RQQ
JaD
o+z
r'
-ate
-a'
�
; ; ;
- - ��
w
m
�
o,r>
J w
w -+a.
O
O
IW
l
wa
�
z$ z
G
'Lzmz
m
m
moo.
r ¢'
O W
o,
QO
O
-
--` s - uL
m--:
-
--
------------
--•- -• --
��W-•-N'�d �---•*mN'n`-'-mom
rn
---•-
-- - --- --
--'-- -- ----
W
O N
--; -;- :-SIJ-
•- \-'--Y
;a y,u
a•�
a-'-- `ic'-�-
a•
m �
,
-
m
ZTom
,�N7
O; ropu°*i z
1,z),'aD
m v
\
�
wmo
ra
o
a
-
r .F
1 i `
N.
;
mw ur w
m0 m O;
m
rp
z
m0
m0
r.
--
--
Via; �,
-'--�
-- ----'--'
uQi�`m
a r r
m
I
4�;a
wm. w'
m
m
>J>J
' W
QO
O
.r
aaf
rn
o
Z•+�-�
Z-4-164
�-
w
A
a.a
r.
,o
m �
,
ra
o
rp
z
w
'N
(�
m
m
m +
m
� �
o z o z;

STREAM ZONE:
STREAM ZONE
LIVE STAKES: 1.5' TO 2' LENGTHS, 1/2' TO 2" DIAMETER,
PLANT AT 3' SPACING, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT.
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME
BLACK WILLOW
SILKY WILLOW
SILKY DOGWOOD
COMMON ELDERBERRY
RIPARIAN FOREST PLANTING:
PLANTING ZONE 1 = 25.7 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9' X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
STATUS
% OF TOTAL
# OF PLANTS
RIVER BIRCH
BETULA NIGRA
FACW
20
5,000
GREEN ASH
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
FACW
20
5,000
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
QUERCUS MICHAUXII
FACW
20
5,000
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FAC
10
2,500
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
20
5,000
TULIP POPLAR
LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
FACU
10
2.500
NOTE: NO SINGLE LIVE STAKING SPECIES 25,000
SHALL COMPOSE MORE THAN 40% OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF LIVE STAKES TO BE INSTALLED.
PLANTING ZONE 2 = 3.8 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9' X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
TULIP POPLAR
LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
SOUTHERN RED OAK
QUERCUS FALCATA
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
WHITE OAK
QUERCUS ALBA
AMERICAN PERSIMMON
DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA
PIN OAK
QUERCUS PALUSTRIS
`fffllflRll!!!I
ospol
SEAL
327'33 i
'���Illllflf l►►
NGRID
NAD '33
—100'-50' 0' 100' 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE
w
w
2
co
Z
��r
W
coN
Lu
Z
LL W
o U
NQ
OZ
W
co00
¢�
(�
a
Q�
Luti
Z
W
¢ Zwar
W U
�F
a
ZO
=
U
oz
LLI
Z
J
LLLH
W
y
PLANTING
PLAN
y
/
LLI
F -Z
(n J
ENC
Y
P
w
<
ER`I�\QN�PS�M
CIONS
U
w
of
O z
w
p w
,7
#
J of D
PLANTING
PLAN

EET 21
SESN
E
z
0
co/v
w'
�SFMFNT _ �
w
cow
U5
z
0
w
co
z
O
U
ow
L2 z>
O�
?z
�o
as
oV
U�
Z�
0
0
v
{� ywo
^UL z DN
`LL w NQ
4 v
)� u)0J Q
�oN z z U
¢ Z �F
Z0
du)
0 z
0
L J (D
LU
Z�
z , I
gp Y z N
Z w v
m Q
(L
1.-
0o CONS�RVATiON�A
SFM�NT
w
H z
Z SQUARE CUT ---
-100'-50' 0' 100' 200' m Y z °
O BUDS w Q U
GRAPHIC SCALE m 0 (FACING UPWARD) N
O w 1--
<
_
LIVE CUTTING ur U
(0.5' TO 2" DIAMETER) O
z
Lu_
W ~
LIVE STAKE ANGLE CUT 300-450 J E=O
���}+�+�++i�+ BOLOWHA FINSTALL NOT BANKFULL)
U
`�,P�H L'�q, PLANTING NOTES: Lu
o
O 5c�SSIQ'•.
�� ¢� UTHC: <~ >
��••: RIFFLES - 2 ROWS OF LIVE STAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL.
SEAL - POOLS - NO LIVE STAKES ON INNER BENDS, 2 ROWS ON OUTER BENDS.
3733 ALL OTHER TRIBUTARIES:
7 �1 RIFFLES - 1 ROW OF LIVE STAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL. AUGUST 2018
.�9j . �. a.= POOLS - NO LIVE STAKES ON INNER BENDS, 1 ROWS ON OUTER BENDS. a E, GRAPHIC
tiptNF J
+''/••
'p. 3' . ` INSTALL STAKES AT SPACINGCONS
�'+ C'HAEL 0"'." ERV
•+'�.,ATION EASEMENT PLANTING
LIVE STAKES J-1 PLAN
SCALE: NTS
SHEET 22 OF 24

EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WILL BE MARKED••''�H
CMgO''•,,
WITH METAL POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND ATA MINIMUM OF 100'
:.••Oqi, . • •• . (� '��
INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY.
SEAL
O 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POSTS AND 5/8"
REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAPS
= �• 32733
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS. CAPS SHALL MEET DMS
SPECIFICATIONS (BERNSTEN RBD5325 IMPRINTED WITH
NC STATE LOGO 89087 OR EQUIVALENT). AFTER
r '
+'�� ••
Z
INSTALLATION, CAPS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH THE
rR A �
O
CORRESPONDING NUMBER.
-4 % �•
`
ii+,',
N
• OOT TALL CONSERVATIONDURABLE ALONG BOUNDARY
OF EASEMENT. POSTS SHALL BE MADE
•�F�AE` ���i�
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS.
THE PROV DER SHALL ATTACH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AT NO MORE THAN 100-FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT = INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCING
— — — — — CONSERVATION EASEMENT = DO NOT INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCING
Nc cRm
NAD 'aa
-100'-50' 0' 100' 200'
w
GRAPHIC SCALE
o�
�w
>z
�O
a¢
of
z�
v
N
H-
U)
o
W
W
r W .
� W.
Imo` SN
LL W In Q
W
W
o
�
n OOa
U
ui
z =
Z
z0
2
Ja O
Q
w oLD
Z < W
W
Lu
Z
(n
J
Y Z
U 0O
ui
Q' Q
Uo
0
z
p C/)
W
Z
J
O
WZ
W
o
I—
Q
w
}
AUGUST 2018
cn�e: GRAPHIC
BOUNDARY
MARKING PLAN
SHEET 23
OF 24

N
-100'-50' 0' 100' 200'
GRAPHIC SCALE
►"14illfrlrrr
A
CAft,
SEAL
D 32733
L
r ►\
'�NAE�/rll llflll►►
EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WILL BE MARKED
WITH METAL POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100'
INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY.
O6 -FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POSTS AND 5/8'
REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAPS
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS. CAPS SHALL MEET DMS
SPECIFICATIONS (BERNSTEN RBD5325 IMPRINTED WITH
NC STATE LOGO #B9087 OR EQUIVALENT). AFTER
INSTALLATION, CAPS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH THE
CORRESPONDING NUMBER.
• 6 -FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT POSTS SHALL BE MADE
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS.
THE PROVIDER SHALL ATTACH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AT NO MORE THAN 100 -FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT= INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCING
- - - - - CONSERVATION EASEMENT= DO NOT INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCING
- - 4W -
b---0�
ca cw0l
1 1
b '
\ I \
\ I
Q I I
LLN
0
U o
v
N W
H
I� LL N
W U1
Q
U
QO
O
K
xWW U
z =�
W
J z0
a o
Of oT
Lj
z ¢i<
W�
Lu Q
z
(n J
Y
z
LLI U
0' Q F
U of Of
no z
oL
Lu z
J � �
BOUNDARY
MARKING PLAN

12.2 Data Analysis/Supplemental Information and Maps
Existing Conditions Cross -Sections
Pebble Counts and Bulk Sampling
Stream Morphological Tables
Reference Reach Data (UT Fisher River)
Estimated Nutrient and Bacterial Reductions
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC 1 TOP XS 1
Drainage Area (sq mi):
30 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
0.0
949.87
4.7
950.04
9.7
950.27
13.4
950.25
14.5
948.73
15.8
946.68
17.1
945.74
18.4
945.73
20.5
945.61
22.5
945.64
23.6
945.63
25.1
946.30
26.4
947.75
28.5
950.15
30.1
950.94
31.9
951.36
34.0
951.41
35.3
950.88
36.6
950.55
38.9
950.98
42.1
952.24
44.5
952.82
48.2
953.14
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
46.05
To of Bank Elevation:
50.25
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
7.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
][2.8
46.49
Flood Prone Width:
9.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
22.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio: ��M10.4
952
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHCI TOP XSl
954
953
952
951
950
949
0
948
W
947
946
--------------------- ------------ --------------------------------
945
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC1 TOP XS2 (REFERENCE)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
53 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
936.67
4.9
936.61
7.6
936.45
8.9
936.33
11.2
936.33
12.0
935.88
12.5
934.80
15.0
933.39
17.7
933.36
22.9
933.07
24.6
932.97
26.0
932.74
27.4
932.76
27.7
932.58
28.5
932.43
29.0
932.53
29.6
932.42
30.2
932.50
31.2
932.65
31.8
933.22
32.8
933.54
34.0
933.57
39.7
933.70
43.8
934.25
46.9
934.66
50.4
935.61
52.7
936.20
55.2
936.53
59.6
936.91
64.8
937.41
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
933.17
Top of Bank Elevation:
933.17
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.0
Bankfull Width:
10.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
933.92
Flood Prone Width:
27.3
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
28.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC1 TOP XS2 (REFERENCE)
938
937
936
w
935
0
934
-------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
ti
W
933
932
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
4.7
922.58
Area (s mi):
84 acres
Watershed:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
Hall Creek
16.4
920.91
17.8
919.12
XS ID
919.06
19.3
UTHC1 LOWER XS3
20.2
919.01
21.1
919.19
Drainage
919.75
22.9
920.10
24.5
- .-
4
921.65
26.5
922.12
27.9
922.30
29.6
4.
33.4
922.25
36.7
922.05
39.0
922.16
41.3
i"A •
�.JX
44.3
923.60
46.5
923.78
49.7
924.02
52.8
C
-ac=3- rs
:r
}.
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River
Basin, Hall Creek, UTHCI LOWER XS3
925
924
923
922
0
------------------------------
921
-----------------------------------
a
W920
---------------------
------ --------------------------------------
919
918
0 10
20
30
40
50
Station (feet)
----Bankfull
Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area
Assessment 12/1/16
Station
Elevation
0.0
922.46
4.7
922.58
Area (s mi):
84 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
922.46
4.7
922.58
9.7
922.64
13.5
922.51
14.8
922.00
16.4
920.91
17.8
919.12
18.6
919.06
19.3
918.92
20.2
919.01
21.1
919.19
21.9
919.75
22.9
920.10
24.5
920.98
25.5
921.65
26.5
922.12
27.9
922.30
29.6
922.43
33.4
922.25
36.7
922.05
39.0
922.16
41.3
922.93
44.3
923.60
46.5
923.78
49.7
924.02
52.8
924.68
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
920.08
To of Bank Elevation:
922.11
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.5
Bankfull Width:
5.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
921.24
Flood Prone Width:
9.0
Max Depth at BankfulL•
1.2
Mean Depth at BankfulL•
0.8
W / D Ratio:
7.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.5
Bank Height Ratio:
2.7

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC2 XS4 (REFERENCE)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
120 acres
Date:
11/22/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
910.24
3.4
909.67
5.6
908.83
7.5
907.48
9.0
906.72
11.6
906.51
14.4
906.61
17.4
906.25
18.5
906.00
18.9
905.83
19.9
905.62
21.0
905.36
21.6
905.22
22.2
905.22
23.9
905.54
24.4
905.90
25.0
907.98
26.2
909.90
28.2
910.63
31.8
911.33
34.5
911.64
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
906.57
Top of Bank Elevation:
906.57
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
7.3
Bankfull Width:
9.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
907.92
Flood Prone Width:
18.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
------------- ----------------------------------- -------------------
1.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC2 XS4 (REFERENCE)
912
911
910
909
w
908
------------- ----------------------------------- -------------------
0
907
W 906
905
904
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/22/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC2 XS5
Drainage Area (sq mi):
170 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
883.82
4.7
883.55
9.2
882.44
11.0
882.01
12.6
881.44
13.9
879.52
14.9
878.56
15.8
878.15
17.4
877.96
19.3
878.04
20.8
878.01
22.4
878.09
24.3
878.93
25.6
879.96
26.8
881.48
29.6
881.60
33.0
881.61
39.3
881.56
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC2 XS5
879.07
To of Bank Elevation:
881.47
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
J880.18
884
883
8.7
Bankfull Width:
10.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
12.3
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
11.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
3.2
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC2 XS5
885
884
883
w
882
0
881
---------------------- --------------------- ------------------------
a
m
ti
W879
880
------------------------ ----------------- --------------------------
878
877
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC3 XS6
Drainage Area (sq mi):
280 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
864.97
4.8
864.82
9.6
864.76
10.8
864.49
11.5
864.01
11.9
860.86
12.4
860.76
13.4
860.71
14.6
860.85
15.7
860.84
16.8
860.98
18.0
861.10
19.0
861.06
22.6
860.92
25.0
861.50
30.4
863.70
32.9
864.33
36.8
864.31
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC3 XS6
861.85
To of Bank Elevation:
864.33
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
11.7
Bankfull Width:
865
14.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
862.99
Flood Prone Width:
17.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
17.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
3.2
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC3 XS6
866
865
864
w
863
0
862
-------------------------------------------- -------------------
ti
W
861
860
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC4 XS7
Drainage Area (sq mi):
365 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger
Station
Elevation
0.0
846.15
6.8
846.05
11.1
845.88
15.8
845.52
19.1
845.25
21.7
844.87
24.5
844.51
25.6
844.31
26.6
843.00
27.4
842.22
28.2
841.14
29.4
840.28
30.1
840.08
31.0
840.26
32.1
840.10
33.3
840.12
34.7
840.11
35.7
840.14
37.0
840.08
38.1
840.02
39.1
840.10
40.7
840.16
41.4
840.32
42.1
841.45
42.9
841.94
44.8
841.78
46.6
842.04
47.9
842.61
49.6
843.76
51.5
844.65
54.0
844.79
55.6
844.67
57.8
844.68
61.2
844.51
64.3
844.63
70.1
844.56
74.9
844.44
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
To of Bank Elevation:
41.93
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
13.9
Bankfull Width:
13.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
42.40
Flood Prone Width:
[841.21
20.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at BankfulL
1.0
W / D Ratio:
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.6
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC4 XS7
847
846
845
w
844
843
_ -
842
a
m
W841
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ ------------------------------
840
839
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC3 XS8
Drainage Area (sq mi):
280 acres
Date:
8/16/2018
Field Crew:
J. Sullivan, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
99.65
5.7
100.23
8.4
100.66
11.7
100.62
13.7
100.42
15.0
100.02
16.1
99.73
17.2
99.12
18.7
96.52
19.1
96.23
20.5
95.69
21.7
95.64
22.8
95.47
23.6
95.45
24.8
95.42
25.8
95.40
26.0
97.35
27.5
98.49
29.1
99.75
30.4
100.51
31.4
100.58
35.2
100.33
43.3
100.02
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.35
Top of Bank Elevation:
100.58
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
12.5
Bankfull Width:
7.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.30
Flood Prone Width:
9.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
W / D Ratio:
4.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
2.7
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC3 XS8
101
100
99
w
98
0
97
ti
W
96
95
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 8/16/18

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
UTHC3 XS9
Drainage Area (sq mi):
280 acres
Date:
8/16/2018
Field Crew:
J. Sullivan, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
100.08
5.1
100.03
9.1
99.91
10.7
99.46
12.4
98.59
14.0
97.92
14.7
95.57
16.1
94.97
18.0
94.85
18.9
95.21
19.9
95.34
20.9
95.84
21.6
96.05
22.8
96.08
23.3
96.31
24.2
96.91
24.7
98.03
25.8
98.36
27.3
99.23
28.3
99.22
30.7
99.36
35.8
99.53
39.1
99.41
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.40
Top of Bank Elevation:99.23
101
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
8.5
Bankfull Width:
9.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.95
Flood Prone Width:
10.8
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
8.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.4
Bank Height Ratio:
2.8
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, UTHC3 XS9
101
100
99
e
98
---------------------- ----------------- -------------------------
- -
0
97
----------------------- -------------- ---------------------------
W
96
95
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 8/17/18

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
Tla
Drainage Area (sq mi):
29 acres
Date:
11/21/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
954.71
5.4
954.83
9.5
954.81
13.9
951.40
16.4
949.02
18.9
946.97
19.5
945.37
20.9
945.35
22.3
945.52
23.9
945.39
24.5
945.45
26.1
945.45
27.5
947.26
30.2
948.94
35.5
951.91
39.1
954.10
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
945.83
Top of Bank Elevation:
954.80
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.8
Bankfull Width:
7.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
946.31
Flood Prone Width: 7.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio: 18.2
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.1
Bank Height Ratio: 19.6
956
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, Tla
955
954
953
952
951
950
949
948
ti
W
947
946 -------------------------------
--------- ---------------------
945
944
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
-Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/21/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
T1 XS1
Drainage Area (sq mi):
30 acres
Date:
11/21/2016
Field Crew:
ALA. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
942.62
3.3
942.63
5.1
942.61
7.3
940.12
8.8
938.55
9.3
938.27
9.8
938.18
11.0
938.36
12.0
938.90
13.0
939.83
14.2
941.01
17.3
942.17
20.4
943.29
22.2
943.92
25.4
943.98
SUMMARY DATA
945
Bankfull Elevation:
939.16
Top of Bank Elevation:
942.60
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.7
Bankfull Width:
4.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
940.14
Flood Prone Width:
6.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
6.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.5
Bank Height Ratio:
4.5
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T1 XS1
945
944
943
942
w
941
0
------------------------------------------------------------------
940
a
m
ti
W939
--------------------- ---------- -----------------------------------
938
937
0 5 10 15 20 25
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/21/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
932.65
3.1
Yadkin
7.7
930.73
Watershed:
931.08
20.7
Hall Creek
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
XS ID
930.99
28.0
T1 XS2 (REFERENCE)
28.8
929.95
Drainage Area (s mi):
929.60
43 acres
929.44
30.6
Date:
31.9
929.51
11/21/2016
929.97
34.2
930.07
36.1
930.40
39.0
930.56
40.6
930.63
42.6
931.58
49.0
931.60
54.7
931.78
r:
f
s'
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, Tl XS2 (REFERENCE)
933
932
931
0
?
------------
-
ti
W
930
I\J
929
0 10
20
30 40 50
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/21/16
Station
0.0
932.65
3.1
931.80
7.7
930.73
14.2
931.08
20.7
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
0.0
932.65
3.1
931.80
7.7
930.73
14.2
931.08
20.7
931.21
24.4
931.47
26.7
930.99
28.0
930.49
28.8
929.95
29.4
929.60
30.3
929.44
30.6
929.41
31.9
929.51
32.8
929.97
34.2
930.07
36.1
930.40
39.0
930.56
40.6
930.63
42.6
931.58
49.0
931.60
54.7
931.78
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
930.34
To of Bank Elevation:
930.35
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
3.8
Bankfull Width:
7.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
931.27
Flood Prone Width:
16.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
.5
W / D Ratio:
.9
E2�.
Entrenchment Ratio:
2
Bank Height Ratio:
.0

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
928.53
7.2
Yadkin
14.6
928.12
Watershed:
40 acres
Date:
Hall Creek
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
XS ID
924.48
19.7
T1 XS3
22.0
924.45
Drainage
924.82
24.5
927.08
4.9
33.7
928.74
41.6
929.50
,is
G.,.:
r
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T1 XS3
930
929
928
w
927
0
926
W
925 ---------------------------
-------
-----------------------------
924
0 5 10
15 20
25 30 35 40 45
Station (feet)
E----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/21/16
Station SUMMARY DATA
0.0 Bankfull Elevation: 925.20
To of Bank Elevation: 928.11
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 3.0
Bankfull Width: 5.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 925.95
928.53
7.2
928.52
14.6
928.12
Area (s mi):
40 acres
Date:
11 /21/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station SUMMARY DATA
0.0 Bankfull Elevation: 925.20
To of Bank Elevation: 928.11
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 3.0
Bankfull Width: 5.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 925.95
928.53
7.2
928.52
14.6
928.12
16.9
927.21
17.4
925.90
18.1
924.91
19.4
924.48
19.7
924.50
22.0
924.45
22.6
924.82
24.5
927.08
4.9
33.7
928.74
41.6
929.50
Flood Prone Width:
6.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
8.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
4.9

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
1.9
929.15
�=
Watershed:
Date:
12/1/2016
Hall Creek
A. French, T. Seelin er
16.7
928.58
XS ID
928.73
19.5
T2
6.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
Drainage
22.2
925.53
23.6
925.51
24.4
925.55
26.0
927.07
28.7
927.85
31.0
928.37
33.7
928.54
38.9
928.36
44.7
928.36
�M
r-
23.0
925.27
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T2
25.2
926.08
930
27.4
927.45
929
w
928
51.3
928.68
54.8
928.92
°
927
---------------------------------
--- -----------------------------
ti
W
926
925
0 5 10
15 20
25 30
35 40 45
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area
Assessment 12/1/16
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 926.03
To of Bank Elevation: 927.80
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 1.5
Bankfull Width: 3.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 926.79
Elevation
0.0
929.36
1.9
929.15
Area (s mi):
16 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 926.03
To of Bank Elevation: 927.80
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 1.5
Bankfull Width: 3.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 926.79
Elevation
0.0
929.36
1.9
929.15
4.8
928.77
9.9
928.66
14.9
928.56
16.7
928.58
18.2
928.73
19.5
928.60
6.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
Bank Height Ratio:
22.2
925.53
23.6
925.51
24.4
925.55
26.0
927.07
28.7
927.85
31.0
928.37
33.7
928.54
38.9
928.36
44.7
928.36
ij
20.4 928.22
21.4 927.71
Flood Prone Width:
4.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
6.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
Bank Height Ratio:
3.3

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
T3
Drainage Area (sq mi):
7 acres
Date:
11/21/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
929.52
4.3
929.32
7.6
928.83
9.7
928.10
11.4
927.18
12.6
926.00
13.8
924.87
14.4
923.84
15.7
923.80
16.7
923.92
17.2
923.75
18.5
924.91
19.9
926.09
21.5
926.52
23.4
926.98
27.2
927.27
31.1
927.48
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
924.17
Top of Bank Elevation:
926.09
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
1.1
Bankfull Width:
3.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
924.60
Flood Prone Width:
4.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
11.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
5.5
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T3
930
929
928
927
0 926
a
W 925
------------------------------ -------- ----------------------------
------------------------------------- -----------------------------
924
923
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 11/21/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
2.6
914.71
Area (s mi):
Watershed:
Date:
11/21/2016
Hall Creek
A. French, T. Seelin er
9.3
910.97
XS ID
910.82
12.2
T4
13.7
910.53
14.0
Drainage
14.5
913.20
16.9
913.55
21.9
914.17
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
6.9
sem- •�, '�,t
�A
i
•rh�F \ r.
y
Mill Dam
Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T4
916
915
914
w
913
0
912
W
911 -------------------------
------------
----------------------
910
0 5
10
15
20 25
Station (feet)
-Bankfull
Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area
Assessment 11/21/16
Station
1.9
Elevation
0.0
914.94
2.6
914.71
Area (s mi):
4 acres
Date:
11/21/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
1.9
Elevation
0.0
914.94
2.6
914.71
5.7
913.91
8.2
913.14
9.0
911.54
9.3
910.97
11.2
910.82
12.2
910.35
13.7
910.53
14.0
911.27
14.5
913.20
16.9
913.55
21.9
914.17
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
910.75
To of Bank Elevation:
913.13
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
0.7
Bankfull Width:
2.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
911.15
Flood Prone Width:
4.7
Max Depth at BankfuBankfull:0.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
9.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
6.9

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
3.7
878.43
Area (s mi):
Watershed:
Date:
12/1/2016
Hall Creek
A. French, T. Seelin er
11.2
874.70
XS ID
874.57
13.4
T6
14.0
874.71
14.5
Drainage
15.9
877.19
19.3
878.16
23.5
878.00
s
.1
-
.:
s,.
n�1." d• S•�t
r
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T6
27.5
877.82
879
878
w
877
876 --------------------
------------
------------------------------
ti
875
874
0 5
10
15 20
25 30
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 8.31
75
To of Bank Elevation: 877.86
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.6
Bankfull Width: 4.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 876.05
Elevation
0.0
878.34
3.7
878.43
Area (s mi):
29 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 8.31
75
To of Bank Elevation: 877.86
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.6
Bankfull Width: 4.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 876.05
Elevation
0.0
878.34
3.7
878.43
7.6
877.98
9.2
875.95
10.3
874.83
11.2
874.70
12.5
874.57
13.4
874.62
14.0
874.71
14.5
876.04
15.9
877.19
19.3
878.16
23.5
878.00
Flood Prone Width:
5.4
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
7.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.2
Bank Height Ratio:
4.4

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
4.4
866.78
Watershed:
40 acres
Date:
Hall Creek
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
13.3
864.61
13.8
864.22
14.2
864.00
XS ID
863.80
15.0
T7
15.6
864.15
Drainage
16.6
865.73
17.7
866.03
19.9
866.35
21.9
866.04
23.0
866.18
24.9
866.86
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T7
869
868
27.1
867.84
867
w
866
0
865
------------------------------
------
-------------------------
W
864
863
0 5
10
15 20 25 30
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 864.90
To of Bank Elevation: 865.72
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.4
Bankfull Width: 3.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 866.00
Elevation
0.0
866.58
4.4
866.78
Area (s mi):
40 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 864.90
To of Bank Elevation: 865.72
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.4
Bankfull Width: 3.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 866.00
Elevation
0.0
866.58
4.4
866.78
8.8
867.16
11.8
867.20
12.8
867.03
13.3
864.61
13.8
864.22
14.2
864.00
14.6
863.80
15.0
863.85
15.6
864.15
W / D Ratio:
16.6
865.73
17.7
866.03
19.9
866.35
21.9
866.04
23.0
866.18
24.9
866.86
Flood Prone Width:
4.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
4.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.7

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
4.6
844.97
Watershed:
7 acres
Date:
Hall Creek
Field Crew:
>>.y,
XS ID
842.92
11.0
T8a
11.4
842.56
Drainage
842.43
12.1
842.40
12.7
842.49
13.6
843.06
14.7
843.90
16.2
844.26
17.7
844.54
19.0
844.55
23.0
844.41
26.5
844.19
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T8a
846
845
w
844
0
--------------------------------
-----------------------------
W843
-----------------------
------ -------------------------------
842
0 5
10
15 20 25 30
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16
Station
Elevation
0.0
845.20
4.6
844.97
Area (s mi):
7 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
845.20
4.6
844.97
7.3
844.63
9.6
844.33
10.0
843.85
10.3
842.92
11.0
842.85
11.4
842.56
11.7
842.43
12.1
842.40
12.7
842.49
13.6
843.06
14.7
843.90
16.2
844.26
17.7
844.54
19.0
844.55
23.0
844.41
26.5
844.19
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
842.95
To of Bank Elevation:
843.89
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
1.0
Bankfull Width:
3.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
843.50
Flood Prone Width:
4.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
Bank Height Ratio:
2.7

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Watershed:
Elevation
0.0
Yadkin
Hall Creek
1.7
v�V
2.8
874.58
3.5
874.32
4.4
874.16
'4
873.58
XS ID
873.61
7.3
T8 XS (REFERENCE)
8.5
873.60
9.3
Drainage Area (s mi):
10.0
15 acres
11.0
874.19
12.6
Date:
13.9
874.54
12/1/2016
875.42
18.1
876.21
Field Crew:
876.75
A. French, T. Seelin er
4.,
y~
..?�sg' ;.•;
a4_,
»::
r- ;.:. t
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T8 XSl (REFERENCE)
877
876
w
875
o-----
------------------------------
---------------------
ti
W
874
873
0 5
10
15
20 25
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area
Assessment 12/1/16
Station
Elevation
0.0
876.09
1.7
875.34
2.8
874.58
3.5
874.32
4.4
874.16
4.9
873.58
6.1
873.61
7.3
873.51
8.5
873.60
9.3
873.81
10.0
874.09
11.0
874.19
12.6
874.18
13.9
874.54
15.7
875.42
18.1
876.21
21.8
876.75
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
874.10
To of Bank Elevation:
874.10
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.5
Bankfull Width:
5.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
874.69
Flood Prone Width:
11.5
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
13.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
Hall Creek
XS ID
T8 XS2
Drainage Area (sq mi):
21 acres
Date:
12/1/2016
Field Crew:
ALA. French, T. Seelin er
Station
Elevation
0.0
842.58
4.8
842.60
10.0
842.67
14.5
842.34
17.0
841.79
18.1
841.14
18.5
840.81
19.3
838.26
20.1
838.17
20.4
838.06
21.2
838.01
21.7
837.96
22.6
837.86
23.1
840.08
25.8
841.00
29.4
841.88
36.7
842.87
40.5
842.91
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
8.74
To of Bank Elevation:
0.08
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
JU8
2.4
Bankfull Width:
3.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
9.62
Flood Prone Width:
4.1
Max Depth at Bankfull: A
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
5.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.1
Bank Height Ratio:
2.5
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T8 XS2
844
843
842
841
0
840
a
ti
------------------------------- ------ ------------------------------
839
838
837
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank ----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation*
0.0
Yadkin
2.0
4-"Fi
Watershed:
100.31
4.9
Hall Creek
5.4
XS ID
99.35
3
T9
7.1
98.31
Drainage Area (s mi):
98.34
29 acres
98.35
8.3
Date:
8.6
98.73
12/1/2016
99.85
10.6
Field Crew:
12.0
100.41
A. French, T. Seelin ger
100.30
Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin River Basin, Hall Creek, T9
101
16.3
100.10
100 -----------------
--------------------
-----------------------
w
°
-----------------------
---------
-----------------------------
99
ti
W
98
0 2 4
6
8 10 12 14 16
Station (feet)
----Bankfull Top of Bank
----Flood Prone Area Assessment 12/1/16
*assumed elevation
Station
Elevation*
0.0
100.07
2.0
100.20
4.0
100.31
4.9
100.16
5.4
Station
Elevation*
0.0
100.07
2.0
100.20
4.0
100.31
4.9
100.16
5.4
99.86
6.0
99.35
6.3
98.48
7.1
98.31
7.4
98.34
8.0
98.35
8.3
98.48
8.6
98.73
9.6
99.85
10.6
100.16
12.0
100.41
14.3
100.30
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
99.20
To of Bank Elevation:
99.85
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.0
Bankfull Width:
2.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.09
Flood Prone Width:
5.5
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
4.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.7

UTHC XS2-REF
100%
80%
a 60%
�?
L 40%
w
° 20°i°
0%
0.01
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
UTHC XS2-REF
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 4
Very Fine .062-.125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 4
Coarse .50-1 D 2
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 7
Very Fine 2 - 4 6
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 2
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 3
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6°
VeryCoarse 32-45 S 10
Very Coarse 45-64 11
Small 64-90 C 1 14
Small 90-128 O 14
0.1 1 10 loo 1000
Particle Size - Millimeters
10000
Large 128-180 B 4
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
1.3
18
37
60
97
130
Size Distribution
mean 11.2
dispersion 15.5
skewness -0.38
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
4%
16%
47%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048
BDRK
Total 100
Note:

UTHC XS3
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
UTHC XS3
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 1
Medium
.25-.50
N
6
Coarse .50-1 D 6
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
8
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 6
Fine 4-5.7 G 5
Fine
5.7-8
R
8
.5
a
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 8
Medium
11.3- 16
V
g
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 6
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 9
Small 64-90 C 7
Small 90-128 O 15
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
1.3
6.8
12
31
92
120
Size Distribution
mean 10.9
dispersion 8.4
skewness -0.03
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
21%
55%
24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

UTHC XS4
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
14
UTHC XS4
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
2
Fine
.125-.25
A
4
100%
Medium
.25-50 .50
N
2
Coarse
.50- 1
D
4
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
1
;,
80%
Very Fine
2 - 4
3
Fine
4-5.7
G
4
Fine
5.7-8
R
e
�?
a
60 /o
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
2
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
1
a
L
40%
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
Coarse
22.6-32
L
5
w
�i•'
Very Coarse
32-45
S
3
20%
Very Coarse
45-64
8
Small
64-90
C
5
0%
Small
90-128
O
1
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
1000
10000
Large
128-180
B
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
Size Distribution
Type
Small
362-512
L
1
D16
0.062
mean 0.1
silt/clay
14%
Medium
512-1024
D
D35
0.57
dispersion 2.2
sand
13%
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
D50
5.2
skewness 0.18
gravel
31%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
34
D65
22
cobble
6%
Total
99
D84
55
boulder
1%
Note:
D95
83
bedrock
34%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

UTHC XSS
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
UTHC XS5
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 1
Very Fine .062-.125 S 3
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium .25-.50 N 7
Coarse .50-1 D 3
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
5
a
so%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 11
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
If
a
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 7
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
1
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 9
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
1
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 11
Small 64-90 C 8
Small 90-128 O 3
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L
Small
Small
256-362
362-512
B
L
Size mm
D 16 0.73
D35 3.4
D50 16
D65 37
D84 65
D95 100
Size Distribution
mean 6.9
dispersion 13.0
skewness -0.26
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
1 %
17%
45%
12%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 26
Total 105
Note:

UTHC XS6
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
UTHC XS6
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium
.25-.50
N
4
Coarse .50-1 D 5
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
5
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 3
Fine 4-5.7 G 4
Fine
5.7-8
R
8
.5
a
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 4
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10
Coarse 22.6-32 L 15
Very Coarse
32-45
S
13
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
loo 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 15
Small 64-90 C 14
Small 90-128 O 4
Large 128-180 B 1
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
Small
256-362
362-512
B
L
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
2.7
15
26
40
67
92
Size Distribution
mean 13.4
dispersion 6.1
skewness -0.24
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
15%
68%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 114
Note:

UTHC XS7
1
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
UTHC XS7
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 6
Very Fine .062-.125 S 2
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium
.25-.50
N
1
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
10
d
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 13
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
40%
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 3
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
3
w
0
20°i°
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
11
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 8
Small 64-90 C 10
Small 90-128 O 8
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L 5
Small
Small
Medium
256-362
362-512
512-1024
B
L
D
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
1.3
6.1
21
41
86
180
Size Distribution
mean 10.6
dispersion 10.1
skewness -0.22
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
5%
15%
47%
21%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 14
Total 117
Note:

Tla
Particle
Millimeter11
Count
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
32
Tla
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
17
Fine
.125-.25
A
23
100%
Medium
.25-.50
N
8
Coarse
.50-1
D
1
so%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
3
Very Fine
2 - 4
3
a
Fine
4-5.7
G
60%
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
a
Medium
11.3- 16
V
40%
Coarse
16-22.6
E
2
w
Coarse
22.6-32
L
20%
Very Coarse
32-45
S
4
Very Coarse
45-64
2
Small
64-90
C
3
0%
Small
90-128
O
1
0.01
0.1
1 10
100 1000
10000
Large
128-180
B
2
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size mn
ff Size Distribution
Type
Small
362-512
L
r
D16
0.062
mean 0.4
silt/clay
31%
Medium
512-1024
D
D35
0.072
dispersion 12.2
sand
51%
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
D50
0
skewness 0.40
gravel
12%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
D65
0.21
cobble
6%
Total
102
D84
2.9
boulder
0%
Note:
D95
71
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
I
M
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Tl XS1
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
9
T1 XS1
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125-.25
A
16
100%
Medium
.25-.50
N
5
Coarse
.50-1
D
4
so%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
4
Very Fine
2 - 4
7
a
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
.5
60%
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
3
a
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
3
40%
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
Coarse
22.6-32
L
9
20%
Very Coarse
32-45
S
13
Very Coarse
45-64
3
Small
64-90
C
5
0%
Small
90-128
O
0.01
0.1
1 10
100 1000
10000
Large
128-180
B
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
Size Distribution
T
e
Small
362-512
L
D16
0.13
mean 2.2
silt/clay
10%
Medium
512-1024
D
D35
0.37
dispersion 17.6
sand
36%
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R I
D50
3
skewness -0.06
gravel
48%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
D65
19
cobble
5%
Total
91
D84
38
boulder
0%
Note:
D95
66
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Tl XS3
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T1 XS3
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 61
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine
.125-.25
A
1
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse .50-1 D 1
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
2
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 2
Fine
4-5.7
G
4
.5
a
;r
Fine 5.7-8 R 5
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 2
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
6
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8
Very Coarse
32-45
S
4
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 5
Small 64-90 C 3
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16 0.062
D35 0.062
D50 0
D65 7.3
D84 25
D95 60
ff Size Distribution
mean 1.2
dispersion 202.1
skewness 0.81
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
51%
6%
39%
3%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L 1
Medium 512-1024 D 1
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 119
Note:

T2
Particle
Millimeter]U—
Count
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
11
T2
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
5
Fine
.125-.25
A
100%
Medium
.25-.50
N
8
Coarse
.50-1
D
1
so%
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
4
a
Fine
4-5.7
G
60%
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
�'
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
3
a
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
g
40%
Coarse
16 - 22.6
E
13
w
Coarse
22.6-32
L
8
20%
Very Coarse
32-45
S
16
Very Coarse
45-64
12
Small
64-90
C
10
0%
Small
90-128
O
3
0.01
0.1
1 10
loo 1000
10000
Large
128-180
B
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
Size Distribution
T
e
Small
362-512
L
D16
0.26
mean 3.9
silt/clay
11%
Medium
512-1024
D
D35
13
dispersion 41.8
sand
14%
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
D50
21
skewness -0.48
gravel
63%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
D65
36
cobble
13%
Total
103
D84
58
boulder
0%
Note:
D95
84
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

T3
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T3
Particle Millimeter11Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 30
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse .50-1 D 2
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
a
so%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 5
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 3
Medium
11.3- 16
V
4
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 8
Small 90-128 O 8
Large 128-180 B 7
Large 180-256 L 6
Small
256-362
B
3
Size mm
Size Distribution
Type
Small
362-512
L
1
D16 0.062
D35 3.1
D50 25
D65 53
D84 130
D95 240
mean 2.8
dispersion 204.2
skewness -0.52
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
28%
5%
38%
27%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 109
Note:

T4
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T4
Particle Millimeter]U—Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 13
Very Fine .062-.125 S 5
Fine
.125-.25
A
47
Medium .25-.50 N 6
Coarse .50-1 D 5
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
5
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 7
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
.5
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 1
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
IR
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 1
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 2
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O 3
Large 128-180 B 3
Large 180-256 L
Small
Small
256-362
362-512
B
L
1
Size mm
D16 0.11
D35 0.16
D50 0
D65 0.36
D84 4.3
D95 120
Size Distribution
mean 0.7
dispersion 11.2
skewness 0.41
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
65%
13%
8%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D 1
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 105
Note:

T6
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T6
Particle Millimeter11Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 7
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine
.125-.25
A
15
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse .50-1 D 4
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
14
a
so%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 10
Fine
4-5.7
G
10
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 13
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 10
Medium
11.3- 16
V
5
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
o%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 1
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16 0.19
D35 1.6
D50 4
D65 6.8
D84 13
D95 27
Size Distribution
mean 1.6
dispersion 12.4
skewness -0.31
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
7%
33%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

T7
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T7
Particle MillimeterllCount
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 3
Very Fine .062-.125 S 4
Fine
.125-.25
A
2
Medium .25-.50 N 6
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
7
a
80%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 10
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
If
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium 8 - 11.3 A
Medium
11.3- 16
V
6
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 10
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
13
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
loo 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 15
Small 64-90 C 13
Small 90-128 O 2
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L
Small
Small
256-362
362-512
B
L
1
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
1.2
7.9
22
41
66
89
Size Distribution
mean 8.9
dispersion 10.7
skewness -0.30
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
3%
18%
62%
16%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 105
Note:

T8a
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T8a
Particle Millimeter11Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 100
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine
.125-.25
A
80%
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse .50-1 D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
a
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4
Fine
4-5.7
G
a
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium 8 - 11.3 A
Medium
11.3- 16
V
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
loo 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16 0.062
D35 0.062
D50 0.062
D65 0.062
D84 0.062
D95 0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness ---
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T8 XS1
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T8 XS1
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 11
Very Fine .062-.125 S 5
Fine
.125-.25
A
4
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse .50-1 D 4
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
10
a
so%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 9
Fine
4-5.7
G
5
.5
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 5
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
1
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 8
Small 64-90 C 10
Small 90-128 O 8
Large 128-180 B 5
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16 0.13
D35 2.2
D50 9
D65 38
D84 81
D95 140
Size Distribution
mean 3.2
dispersion 37.5
skewness -0.25
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
11
23%
43%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T8 XS2
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
T8 XS2
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 27
Very Fine .062-.125 S 8
Fine
.125-.25
A
A
Medium .25-.50 N 8
Coarse .50-1 D 3
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
14
a
9
so%
60%
Very Fine 2 - 4 10
Fine
4-5.7
G
a
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 1
78
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
3
w
40%
20%
Coarse 16-22.6 E
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
3
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10
Particle Size - Millimeters
100 1000
10000
Very Coarse 45-64 6
Small 64-90 C 1
Small 90-128 O 5
Large 128- 180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
1
Size mm
D16 0.062
D35 0.29
D50 1
D65 3.5
D84 30
D95 95
Size Distribution
mean 1.4
dispersion 22.0
skewness -0.01
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
26%
31%
36%
6%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 105
Note:

T9
Particle
MillimeterCount
Particle Size Distribution
Mill Dam Creek
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/CAL
28
T9
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
8
Fine
.125-.25
A
62
100%
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
3
a
Fine
4-5.7
G
60%
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
3
a
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
40%
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w
Coarse
22.6-32
L
20%
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
0%
Small
90-128
O
0.01
0.1
1 10
loo 1000
10000
Large
128-180
B
Particle Size - Millimeters
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
r
Size mm
Size Distribution
Type
Small
362-512
L
D16
0.062
mean 0.1
silt/clay
26%
Medium
512-1024
D
D35
0.13
dispersion 2.0
sand
66%
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
D50
0
skewness -0.13
gravel
8%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
D65
0.18
cobble
0%
Total
106
D84
0.23
boulder
0%
Note:
D95
3.7
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Point / Side BAR -BULK MATERIALS SAMPLE DATA: Size Distribution Analysis Party: A. French, T. Seelinger, R. Jones
s
D Location: Mill Dam Creek Date: Dec -2016 Notes: Located at UTHC-XS6
B ���� �� �� - �� �� �� -
S Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm)
A
P Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tar eight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) are Weight (k Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) SURFACE
L MATERIALS
E 0.91 ' DATA
Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample eg tqj Sample Weights ( Two Largest Particles)
Total Net Lotal Net 11 Total Net 11 Total Net 11 Total Net I Total Net Lotal Net 11 Total Net 11
I TotalNet I11 Total Net
17F 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 2.1 3.7 1.6 I I� No. Dia. WT.
5
S
t.
%Grand Tot. 11.4° 4 9612147% 129.0%
>CCum. /o-< 11.4%1'16.3%
NOTES
36.5% 1T,yo
54.3% 186.1
3.7
1.6 0.0 0.0
13.9% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 1100.0% 100.0%
Bucket
+ Materials
Weight_
Bucket
Tare
Weight_
Materials
Weight
(Materials less than:
mm.)
11.6
Be Sure to Add
Separate Material
Weights to Grand
Total
GRAND TOTAL
SAMPLE WEIGHT

Point / Side BAR -BULK MATERIALS SAMPLE DATA: Size Distribution Analysis Party: A. French, T. Seelinger, R. Jones
s
D Location: Mill Dam Creek Date: Dec -2016 Notes: Located at UTHC-XS7
B ��_ �� �� - �� �� �� -
S Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm) Sieve Size (mm)
A
M < 1.0
P Tare Weight (kg)Tare Weight (kg) Tar eight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) are Weight (k Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) Tare Weight (kg) SURFACE
L MATERIALS
E 1.08 ' DATA
Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample Weights Sample eg bqj Sample Weights ( Two Largest Particles)
Total Net Lotal Net 11 Total Net 11 Total Net 11 Total Net I Total Net Lotal Net 11 Total Net 11
I TotalNet I11 Total Net
17F 1.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.8 1.8 3.6 4.0 I I� No. Dia. WT.
5
S
04
!a 11
Tot
t.
%Grand Tot. k3.8 % � 3 2% � I 0.63.4%6% 94%>CCum. /o-< .8/0 7.2/0
NOTES
25.7% - 139.6% 168.2%
4.00.0 0.0
31.8% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Bucket
+ Materials
Weight_
Bucket
Tare
Weight_
Materials
Weight
(Materials less than:
mm.)
12.6
Be Sure to Add
Separate Material
Weights to Grand
Total
GRAND TOTAL
SAMPLE WEIGHT

Morphological Criteria
Variables im
UTHC1
UTHC3
T1
Existing Channel
T1A T2 T3 T4
T6
T6A T7
T8
T8A
T9
Reference for
UTHC
UTFR
Stable
Design
Ratios
'C' stream
Stable
Design
Ratios
'Bc'stream
UTHC1
(top)
UTHC1
(bottom)
UTHC3
T1
T1A
T2
Restored Reach
T3 T4
T6
T6A
T7
T8
T8A
T9
Stream Type (Rosgen)
F4, C4, B4
F4
B4, C4, G4
F4
G4
G4
B4
G4
** G4
G4
G4
B4
134c
C4
134c
C4
C4
C4
C4b
C4b
C4b
C4b
C4b
Cob
C4b
C4b
C4b
C4b
C4b
Drainage Area (me)
0.18
0.46
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01 0.06
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.38
-
-
0.08
0.18
0.46
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.04
Bankfull Width (WbO (ft)
5.8-10.6
8.5-14.1
4.1 - 7.5
7.1
3.1
1 3.5
2.5
4.4
** 3.2
3.6
3.1
2.9
9.0-10.0
-
-
6.5
9
12
6.5
5.5 1
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.5
4.5 1
6.5
5.5
4.5
1 5.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (Dba) (ft)
0.4-0.8
0.8-1.6
0.5-0.7
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.6
** 0.8
0.7
0.3
0.7
1.1 -- 1.2
-
-
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (Abp) (W)
2.8-4.5
8.5-12.5
2.7-3.8
2.8
1.5
1.1
0.7
2.6
** 2.4
2.4
1
2
10.4--10.7
-
-
3.4
6.1
11.4
3.4
2.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.5
1.7
3.4
2.5
1.7
2.5
Width / Depth Ratio (Wba/ Db.)
7.6-28.2
5-17
6.2-14.9
18.2
6.3
11.3
9.4
7.5
** 4.1
5.5
5.5
4.3
8.0-10.0
10--15
12--18
12.4
13.4
12.7
12.4
12.1
12
12
12
12.1
12
12.4
12.1
12
12.1
Maximum Depth WmW) (ft)
0.4-1.2
1.1-2.0
0.8-1.0
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.7
** 1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3--1.5
-
-
0.8
1
1.5
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.7
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wrp.) (ft)
9.0-27.3
17.1
6.0-32.8
7.7
4
4.2
4.7
5.4
** 4.6
4.1
4.1
5.5
13--21
-
-
50
50
68
35
35
22
18
16
24
24
28
25
20
22
Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
1.2-2.6
1.2
1.5-4.4
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.9
1.2
** 1.4
1.1
1.1
1.9
1.3--2.3
>2.5
>2.2
7.7
5.6
5.7
5.4
6.4
4.9
4
3.6
4.4
5.3
4.3
4.5
4.4
4
Sinuosity (stream length/valley length) (K)
1.2
1.2
1.1 1
1.1
1.1
1 1.1
1.0
1.0
** 1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2--1.4
1.1 -- 1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1 1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1 1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Pool Mean Depth (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
*
*
1.2--1.4
-
-
0.9
1.2
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
Riffle Mean Depth (ft) (Dbkf)
0.4-0.8
0.8-1.6
0.5-0.7
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.6
** 0.8
0.7
0.3
0.7
1.1 -- 1.2
-
-
0.5
0.7
0.9
1 0.5
0.5
0.4
1 0.4
0.4
1 0.5
0.4
0.5 1
0.5
0.4
0.5
Pool Width (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
*
8.4 -- 11.6
-
-
9.1
12.6
16.8
9.1
7.7
6.3
6.3
6.3
7.7
6.3
9.1
7.7
6.3
7.7
Riffle Width (ft)
5.8-10.6
8.5-14.1
4.1 - 7.5
7.1
3.1
3.5
2.5
4.4
** 3.2
3.6 1
3.1
2.9
90. -- 9.9
-
-
6.5
9
12
6.5
5.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.5
4.5
6.5
5.5
4.5
5.5
o
Pool XS Area (sf)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
*
11.6--13.4
-
-
8.6
14.9
27.7
8.6
6.4
4.5
4.5
4.5
6.4
4.5
8.6
6.4
4.5
6.4
y
Riffle XS Area (sf)
2.8-4.5
8.5-12.5
2.7-3.8
2.8
1.5
1.1
0.7
2.6
** 2.4
2.4
12
10.4--10.7
-
-
3.4
6.1
11.4
3.4
2.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.5
1.7
3.4
2.5
1.7
2.5
Pool Width / Riffle Width
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
0.8--1.3
1.2--1.7
1.1 -- 1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Pool Max Depth / Dbxr
«
«
««
*
2.1 -- 2.4
1.5--3.5
2.0--3.5
3.2
2.9
3.1
3.2
2.8
3
3
3
2.8
3
3.2
2.8
3
2.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0-10.4
2.7-3.2
1.0-4.5
19.6
3.3
5.5
6.9
4.4
** 1.7
2.5
2.7
1.7
1.0
1.0 -- 1.1
1.0 -- 1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Mean Bankfull Velocity (V) (fps)
3.8-5.1
3.7-5.1
3.6-4.9
3.4
4.7
4.4
5.2
3.9
** 5.3
5.5
3.8
4.9
4.1 -- 4.5
3.5--5.0
4.0--6.0
4.3
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.2
4.5
5.3
7.3
4.5
6.6
4.2
5.2
4.6
5
Bankfull Discharge (Q) (cfs)
11-16
51
13--14
9.5
6.3
4.8
3.4
10
** 13
13.4
3.7
9.7
42--46
-
-
14.6
28
51.9
14.8
10.5
7.7
9.1 ***
, ga
11.2
11.4
14.3
12.9****
7.9***
12.4**
Radius of Curvature (Rc) (ft)
«
«« «
*
13--42
-
-
18-27
18-27
24-36
15-22
15-22
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
15-22
Na
Na
Na
Belt Width (Wblt) (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
45
-
-
26-49
36-61
39-57
23-41
20-28
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
20-24
Na
Na
24
E
Meander Length (Lm) (ft)
*
«
««
93 - 136-
-
84 - 125
54-118
111-173
60-83
72-84
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
85-88
Na
Na
Na
a
Radius of Curvature /Bankfull Width
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
1.3--4.4
2--3
Na
2.8-4.1
2.0-3.0
2.0-3.0
2.3-3.4
2.3-3.4
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
2.3-3.4
Na
Na
Na
Meander Width Ratio (Wblt/Wbkf)
«
««
*
4.5--5.0
3.5--8
Na
4.0-7.5
4.0-6.8
3.3-4.8
3.5-6.3
3.6-5.1
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
3.1-3.7
Na
Na
Na
Meander Length / Bankfull Width
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
*
*
9.0--15.0
7-14
Na
12.9 - 19.2
6.0 - 13.1
9.3 - 14.4
8.2 - 11.4
11.1 - 12.9
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
13.1 - 13.5
Na
Na
Na
Valley slope
0.028
0.017
0.028
0.039
0.049
0.06
0.12
0.042
** 0.03
0.045
0.051
0.013
0.016
0.005 - 0.015 0.005 - 0.01
0.028
0.025
0.017
0.029
0.032
0.046
0.065
0.118
0.038
0.098
0.026
0.05
0.047
0.045
Average water surface slope
0.021
0.014
0.026
0.022
0.038 0.059 0.089 0.041
** 0.033 0.044
0.052
0.039
0.013
-
-
0.025
0.021
0.015
0.026
0.03
0.042
0.059
0.113
0.034
0.091
0.024
0.045
0.044
0.042
Riffle slope
0.024 - 0.033
0.015
0.019 - 0.028
0.025
0.04
0.058
0.1
0.02
** 0.032 0.041
0.044
0.031
0.013 - 0.028
-
-
0.018 - 0.046
0 038
0.007 - 0.032 0.015 - 0.060
0.020 - 0.062 0.024 - 0.063
0.051 - 0.074
0 103
0.020-0.053 0.087-0.099
0.017-0.043 0.043-0.050
0.019-0.052
0.037
o
Pool slope
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
0-0.001
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
Pool to pool spacing
*
«
««
-
30--59
-
-
48-70
51 -66
52-101
25-63
32-58
21 -34
20-30
24-27
32-47
22-23
36-57
32-45
28-38
34-36
Arc length
*
*
*
*
** *
*
3-25
-
-
16-32
14-35
19-51
10-21
12-29
Na
Na
Na
Na
Na
11-18
Na
Na
Na
Riffle Slope/ Avg. Water Surface Slope
1.1-1.6
1.1
0.7-1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
0.5
** 1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0--2.2
1.2--1.5
1.1--1.8
0.7-1.8
1.0-1.7
0.5-2.1
0.6-2.3
0.7-2.1
0.6-1.5
0.9-1.3
0.90
0.6-1.6
1.0-1.1
0.7-1.8
1.0-1.1
0.4-1.2
0.90
Pool Slope / Avg. Water Surface Slope
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
** *
*
*
0
0-0.2
0--0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pool to Pool Spacing /Bankfull Width
*
**
3.3--6.0
3.5--7.0
1.5--6.0
1 7.4-10.8
5.6-7.3
4.3-8.4
3.9-9.7
5.8-10.5
4.7-7.6
4.4-6.7
5.3-6.0
5.8-8.5
4.9-5.1
5.5-10.4
5.8-8.2
6.2-8.4
6.2-6.5
* : no data shown for pools in existing stream do to channelization / lack of bed diversity
** : no cross-section data collected (ponded area)
***: cross-section sized larger for constructability,
****: cross-section sized larger than regional curve to match discharge on stable upstream cross-section
Na : not applicable for steeper step pool stream types

Directions to Reference Reach:
-From 1-77, take Exit 93.
-Travel West from 1-77.
-Bear right on Fisher Valley Rd (SR 1338)
-UT to Fisher River crosses road
approximately 3 miles from 1-77 near
street address 317 Fisher Valley Rd
N
rn
�r
r
n
Lat 36.4265 / Long -80.8092
Fisher
HODGES MILL
0 500 1,000
Feet
1_��
UT TO FISHER RIVER
REFERENCE SITE LOCATION
SURRY COUNTY, NC
7
F,
N
ASource: Bottom (2013) USGS
1:24000 Quadrangle Map

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
UT to Fisher River
XS ID
XS#1 Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.38
Date:
6/9/2005
Field Crew:
G. Mryncza, A. Spiller
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
0.0
2.22
100.00
3.0
2.15
100.07
5.0
2.50
99.72
7.0
2.98
99.24
8.0
3.49
98.73
8.8
4.00
98.22
9.0
4.96
97.26
12.0
5.03
97.19
14.0
5.25
96.97
16.0
5.16
97.06
17.0
5.20
97.02
18.0
5.06
97.16
18.7
4.00
98.22
19.5
2.65
99.57
20.0
1.66
100.56
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.22
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.40
Bankfull Width:
10.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.47
Flood Prone Width:
13.10
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.25
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.04
W / D Ratio:
9.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.30
Bank Height Ratio:
2.08
Slope (ft/ft):
0.013
Dischar a (cfs)
42
Stream Type: jB4c
Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#1 Riffle
110
105
w
0
100
- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W
95
Bankfu
Flood Prone Area
Flood
90
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Pebble Count
Material
Size Range (mm)
Count
Note:
UT to Fsher River
silt/clay
0 0.062 0
Surry County, NC
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand1
0.062
0.13
0
Riffle #1 (Sta. 01+00)
0.13 0.25 0
0.25 0.5 0
100%
90% 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1
25
1 1 1 1
0.5 1 5
2 8
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse ravel
2
4
21
4 6 9
80%
70%
60%
w
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1
1 1
1 1 1 1
20
15 9
6 8 8
8 11 11
11 16 6
16 22 7
22 32 2
32 45 9
50%
a 40%
10
45 64 6
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
verylarge cobble180
64
90
5
30%
20%
lo%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
f cumulative %
5
0
10000
# of particles
90 128 2
128 180 1
256 0
small boulder
small boulde
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256 362 0
362 512 0
512 1024 0
1024 2048 0
2048 4096 0
total particle count: 100
bedrock
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
based on
sediment
particles only
size percent less than (mm)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
particle size distribution
gradation geo mean std dev
2.208 4.18 7.7 13 42 79
4.5 9.6 4.3
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det artificial
total count: 100
0% 13% 79% 8% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
UT to Fisher River
XS ID
XS#3 Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.38
Date:
6/9/2005
Field Crew:
G. Mryncza, A. Spiller
Station
Rod Ht.
levation
0.0
1.33
100.00
3.0
1.78
99.55
5.0
2.35
98.98
5.5
2.82
98.51
5.7
3.81
97.52
6.0
4.52
96.81
6.5
5.79
95.54
8.0
5.82
95.51
9.0
5.50
95.83
10.0
5.02
96.31
11.5
4.80
96.53
13.0
3.90
97.43
14.0
3.55
97.78
16.0
3.03
98.30
20.0
2.66
98.67
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.78
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
11.60
Bankfull Width:
8.35
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.05
Flood Prone Width:
105
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.27
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.39
W / D Ratio:
6.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
100
Bank Height Ratio:
0.85
Slo a (ft/ft):
0.001
Dischar a (cfs)
52
Stream Type: B4c
Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#3 Pool
110
105
w
0
100
W
95
Bankfu
Flood
Flood Prone Area
90
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
UT to Fisher River
XS ID
XS#2 Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.38
Date:
6/9/2005
Field Crew:
G. Mryncza, A. Spiller
Station
Rod H
levation
0.0
2.68
100.00
3.0
2.94
99.74
5.0
3.61
99.07
6.0
4.10
98.58
6.8
4.56
98.12
7.0
4.70
97.98
9.0
4.94
97.74
11.0
5.21
97.47
12.0
5.64
97.04
13.0
6.00
96.68
15.0
6.59
96.09
17.0
6.42
96.26
18.0
6.50
96.18
18.2
4.93
97.75
19.0
3.56
99.12
20.0
2.80
99.88
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.12
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
13.40
Bankfull Width:
11.62
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.15
Flood Prone Width:
105
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.03
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.15
W / D Ratio:
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
100
Bank Height Ratio:
0.81
Slope (ft/ft):
0.001
Dischar a (cfs)
56
Stream Type: JL I B4c
Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#2 Pool
110
105
w
0
100
W
95
Bankfu'Flood
Flood Prone Area
90
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Yadkin
Watershed:
UT to Fisher River
XS ID
XS#4 Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.38
Date:
6/9/2005
Field Crew:
G. Mryncza, A. Spiller
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
0.0
4.62
100.00
3.0
5.54
99.08
7.0
6.01
98.61
8.5
6.34
98.28
9.0
7.04
97.58
9.5
7.66
96.96
11.0
7.67
96.95
12.0
7.79
96.83
14.0
7.58
97.04
16.0
7.57
97.05
17.0
7.51
97.11
17.5
6.34
98.28
19.0
5.90
98.72
21.0
5.06
99.56
25.0
4.37
100.25
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.28
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.70
Bankfull Width:
9.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.73
Flood Prone Width:
20.50
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.45
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.19
W / D Ratio:
7.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.30
Bank Height Ratio:
1.00
Slope (ft/ft):
0.013
Dischar a (cfs)
46
Stream Type: jB4c
Yadkin River Basin, UT to Fisher River, XS#4 Riffle
110
105
w
0
100
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m.
. . . - . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . .
W
95
Bankfu
Flood Prone Area
Flood
90
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Pebble Count
Material
Size Range (mm)
Count
Note:
UT to Fsher River
silt/clay
0 0.062 1
Surry County, NC
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand1
0.062
0.13
0
Riffle #2 (Sta. 02+55)
0.13 0.25 0
0.25 0.5 0
100%
90% 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1 1
18
1 1 1
0.5 1 8
2 10
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse ravel
2
4
16
4 6 16
80%
70%
60%
w
1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
11
16
14
12
10
6 8 10
8 11 1 12
11 16 12
16 22 7
22 32 4
32 45 3
50%
° 40%
"
45 64 0
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
verylarge cobble180
64
90
1
-
30%
20%
lo%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
f cumulative %
CD
6
4
2
0
10000
# of particles
90 128 0
128 180 0
256 0
small boulder
small bou er
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256 362 0
62 512 0
512 1024 0
1024 2048 0
2048 4096 0
total particle count: 100
bedrock
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
based on
sediment
particles only
size percent less than (mm)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
particle size distribution
gradation geo mean std dev
1.625 4.00 5.8 9 16 29
3.1 5.0 3.1
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det artificial
total count: 100
1% 18% 80% 1% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%

Pebble Count
Material
Size Range (mm)
Count
Note:
UT to Fsher River
silt/clay
0 0.062 0
Surry County, NC
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand1
0.062
0.13
0
0.13 0.25 0
Reach Pebble Count
0.25 0.5 2
100%
90%
I I I I I I I 1 11 I 1 1
1
1 1 1
16
1 1 1
0.5 1 7
2 15
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
coarse gravel
coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse Eravel
2
4
13
4 6 9
80%
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1
1 1
1
1
14
6 8 10
12
8 11 9
11 16 5
70%
60%-10
16 22 7
22 32 6
w
50%
8 °
32 45 7
°.
40%
30%
1
20% I I I I I I I IJI 11 1 1
1o%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
particle size (mm)
f cumulative %
6
y
1 1 T 4
2
0
10000
# of particles
45 64 6
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
64 90 4
90 128 0
128 180 0
180 256 0
small boulder
small bou er
medium boulder
large boulder
very large boulder
256 362 0
362 512 0
512 1024 0
1024 2048 0
2048 4096 0
total particle count: 100
bedrock
clay hardpan
detritus/wood
artificial
based on
sediment
particles only
size percent less than (mm)
D16 D35 D50 D65 D84
D95
particle size distribution
gradation geo mean std dev
1.382 3.60 6.7 11 34 60
4.9 6.8 4.9
based on
total count
percent by substrate type
silt/clay sand gravel cobble boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det artificial
total count: 100
0% 24% 72% 4% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%

UT to Fisher River Profile
95
_ -
94 -
93
92
91
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Channel Distance tft)
WIN
—=ME�
94
534
�■■■■�_
©
222
5
5.25
��—�--
35 1
5.34_-_-_-_�_�_
.�
0
443
7 1
5.36
50 15.27
1
.�
5.21
64 1
0
69
8
4.426
®----®
'
®
81
.�
4. 65
83
5.
�
©
®-----
©_
885.25
1....W_-_-_-_-_-_
0
984
7
5.09
0
102���■I
5.56 �■■■■�-
®-----
®4
125
S.
�1
127
IMM.N
5.55
1 35
5.8
�----
F
140
6 16
.
�----
142 IM
.[
6.46 1....M
®---�-
147 '
6.71-----
IMM■[
]■■■■M
0
162
674
0
170
FF 11: 04
---��
it
■1
678
j■■■■M----®
0
1'721
80
6.13
1 .56
M■[
]MENEM�
0
205
4.97
®----®
�1��■`�
54
I■■■■■D-----
©
205
5.65
217
IMM■■
I■■■EMF-----
0
228
5:22
232
5
4.83----®i.
N
237 J�
■J5.37�■■■�
4.94
----®
247
5.35
4.97
�----®
260 46 i�•
7.71
E
M18:081MMMO�
_
0
260 ;;
284
M
IMMMU..
■�
78
�■■■■�
IMP 0
22
97 �
7.92
Nor=

Estimated Reduction in Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus for Mill Dam Creek Restoration Project
Cattle Exclusion (Grazing Pasture)
TN reduction (Ibs/yr) = 51.04 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
TP reduction (Ibs/yr) = 4.23 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
Reduction (Ibs/ac/year) Acres Total Reduction (lbs/year)
TN 51.04 12.8 653.3
TP 4.23 12.8 54.1
Nutrient Reduction from Buffer Adjacent to Agricultural Fields
TN reduction (Ibs/yr) = 75.77 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
TP reduction (Ibs/yr) = 4.88 (lbs/ac/yr) x Area (ac)
Reduction (Ibs/ac/year) Acres Total Reduction (Ibs/year)
TN 75.8 1.0 73.5
TP 4.9 1.0 4.7
Total Estimated Nitrogen and Phosphorus Reduction from Exclusion and Buffer
Cattle Exclusion Buffer Total Reduction (lbs/year)
TN 653.3 73.5 727
TP 54.1 4.7 59

Estimate of the Amount of Fecal Coliform Prevented from Entering Stream due to Livestock Exclusion at the Mill Dam Creek Restoration Project
1. Fecal from direct input
2. Fecal from buffer filtering
Fecal Coliform Reduction from Direct Input (col) = 2.2 x 1011(col/AU/day) x AU x 0.085
Fecal (col/AU/day)
# cows
Average Weight
Total Weight
AU=total/1000
An animal unit AU is one
2.200E+11
75
0.085
1.403E+12
thousand pounds of livestock.
50
1,500
75,000
75
Assume avg cow weighs 1500 lb.
Fecal Coliform Reduction from Direct Input (col) = 2.2 x 1011(col/AU/day) x AU x 0.085
Fecal (col/AU/day)
AU
Percent
Total (col/day)
Total(col/year)
Total (half-year grazing)
2.200E+11
75
0.085
1.403E+12
5.119E+14
2.560E+14
Weighted Curve Number
Land Use / Hydrologic Soil
Group
CN
Acres
Weighted CN
Pasture (Fair) / A
49
0.1
70.5
Pasture (Fair) / B 69
10.7
Pasture (Fair) / C 79
1.7
Pasture (Fair) / D 84
0.3
Runoff - Q (inches)
P (annual rainfall in inches)
Weighted CN
S (inches)
la (inches)
Q (inches)
46.64
70.5
4.18
0.84
42.0
Fecal Coliform Reduction from Buffer Filtration (col) = Runoff's fecal coliform concentration (col/gal) x Runoff volume (Gal) x 0.85
Total Coliform Reducation
Direct Input Reduction 2.560E+14
Buffer Filtration 4.076E+11
Total (col/year) 2.564E+14
Fecal reduction
Common Fecal Coliform
Fecal conc (col/gal)
Q (in)
Total acres
Volume (in -ac)
Vol (gal)
(col/year)
Pastures under Continually
Grazing Year-round
1,894,000
Pastures Grazed for Half of
329,500
42.0
12.8
536.0
14,554,285
4.076E+11
Year
Pastures Grazed for Two
Months of Year
340,900
Total Coliform Reducation
Direct Input Reduction 2.560E+14
Buffer Filtration 4.076E+11
Total (col/year) 2.564E+14

12.3 Site Protection Instrument
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

39'07"W
I FACFUFMT 1INF TAR[ F I
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
E51
104.18
503'09'01"E
E52
103.09
507'30'51 "W
E53
132.73
N71'00'45"W
E54
116.71
N04'54'35"E
E55
69.57
N5B'00'05"W
E56
27.79
SO4'45'31"E
E57
69.21
578'00'53"W
E58
93.89
N81'23'51"W
E59
45.36 1
N17'14'29"E
E60
64.21 1
N78'25'44"E
E61
86.60
571"00'45"
E62
83.90
551-23'51"E
E63
75.67.
S25 24'54"W
E64
76.58
S82'05'29"W
E65
94.89
N15'30'38"E
E66
NOT USED
E67
NOT USED
E68
NOT USED
E69 I
NOT USED
E70
159.23 1
N87 -26'33"W
E71
448.33
N25'03'29"E
E72
96.70
N75'44'21"W
E73
95.83
N79'41'11"W
E74
39.80
N15'29'04"E
E75
76.58
N82'05'29"E
E76
60.40
S0339'59"W
E77
104.64
S67'02'48"E
E78 1
55.31
527'51'57"E
E79
84.02 1
543'56'33"E
E80
109.00
SOI -56'07"E
E81
65.30
555'00'13"E
E82
52.40
N77'31'33"E
E83
163.40
S45 08'02"E
E84
136.95
557'19'12"E
E85
188.11
531'23' 05"E
E86
28.69
522'52'18"E
E87
115.52
S24 01'53"W
E88
74.74
S25'26'18"W
E89
78.31
S1634'25"W
E90
114.93
S25'27'14"E
E91
25.09
514'39'42"E
E92
24.07 1
558'06'14"E
E93
308.59
516'23'40"E
E94
24.68
512'45'53"W
E95
106.74
512'45'53"W
E96
229.86
588'25 . 08"E
E97
140.79
503'01'42"W
E98
140.37
S5728'38"W
E99
125.91
55728'38"W
E100
215.12
N32'57'05"W
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED, _
DRAWN FROM INFORMATION AS SHOWN HEREON', THAT THE RAJ
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1j10,ODQT'� liiSM s _3 -
DOES REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY ANDD
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.47-MASAMEND YSTFIEZ3 - _ -
MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND#MEi✓€7tM
30TH DAY OF , 9Q17 -
�'�`/J - !
CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER
AMES M. GELLENTHIN
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SUI
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S.
THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUN
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT
OTHER EXCEPTION -M THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVf
1
909901.10
1550398.57
2
909785.76
1550382.03
3
909840.87
1550177,05
4
909903.11
1550123.28
5
910037.69
1549912.10
6
910223.64
1549727.01
7
910334.53
1549805.93
8
910311.76
1549833.87
9
910329.59
1549871.35
10
910331.88
1549975.78
11
910359.70
1550028.23
12
910251.53
1550080.39
13
1 910212.53
1550006.87
14
910211,08
1549940.26
15
910082.04
1550075.00
16
910020.40
1550173.82
17
909955.23
1550237.87
18
909940.70
1550320.24
19
910238.01
1549712.69
20
910277.34
1549673.50
21
1 910357.60
15497 41.05
22
910382.13
1549747.55
23
910347.20
1549790.40
24
911097.21
1550637.08
25
911175.53
1550602.05
26
911250.54
1550575.59
27
911258.64
1550553.30
28
911414.33
1550608.28
29
911366.23
1550710.68
30
911327.28
1550732.20
31
911275.98
15 50 517.0 0
32
911331.71
1550479.90
33
911524.77
1550085.04
34
911641.65
1550142.19
35
1 911431.52
1550571.93
36
911285.98
1550755.02
37
911123.94
1550817.61
38
910984.11
1550687,67
39
911060.68
1550840.73
40
910927.38
1550938.35
41
910817.85
1551122.95
42
910841.69
1551234.66
43
910681.83
1551294.63
44
910652.99
1551119.46
45
910873.98
1550765.78
46
910937.24
1550726.01
47
910662.89
1551301.73
48
910558.87
1551307.46
49
910456.66
1551293.98
50
910499.84
1551168.47
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED, _
DRAWN FROM INFORMATION AS SHOWN HEREON', THAT THE RAJ
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1j10,ODQT'� liiSM s _3 -
DOES REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY ANDD
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.47-MASAMEND YSTFIEZ3 - _ -
MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND#MEi✓€7tM
30TH DAY OF , 9Q17 -
�'�`/J - !
CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER
AMES M. GELLENTHIN
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SUI
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S.
THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUN
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT
OTHER EXCEPTION -M THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVf
51
910616.12
1551178.46
52
910414.54
1551293.44
53
910386.85
1551295.75
54
910372.47
1551228.05
55
910386.52
1551135.21
56
1 910429.84
1551148.65
57
910442.72
1551211.56
58
910347.74
1551124.13
59
910335.19
1551207,09
60
910266.84
1551174.61
61
910256.31
1551098.76
62
909917.95
1551289.69
63
909715.98
1551195.17
64
909825.77
1552553.64
65
909787.93
1552619.66
66
909690.66
1551183.32
67
909697.77
1551024.25
68
910103.90
1551214.13
69
910127.72
1551120.41
70
910217.95
1551088.13
71
910 20 6.57
1551170.75
72
910165.76
1551267.11
73
910116.86
1551292.96
74
910056,37
1551351.26
75
909947.43
1551354.94
76
909909,98
1551408.44
77
909921.29
1551459.60
78
909806.02
1551575.41
79
909732.06
1551690.68
80
909571.49
1551788.64
81
909545.136
1551799.80
82
909439.55
1551752.75
83
909372.06
1551720.65
84
909297.00
1551698.31
85
909193.22
1551747.71
86
1 909168.95
1551754.06
87
909156.23
1551774.49
88
908860.19
1551861.59
89
908836.12
1551856.14
90
908732.02
1551832.55
91
908 729.92
1551908.53
92
908585.08
1552069.76
93
908509.61
1551951.41
94
908441.92
1551845.24
95
908622.43
1551728.23
96
908625.65
1551659.58
97
908747.27
1551670.55
98
908742.18
1551779.14
149
908807.48
1551805.47
00
Hi9
908890.51
1551769.08
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED, _
DRAWN FROM INFORMATION AS SHOWN HEREON', THAT THE RAJ
PRECISION AS CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1j10,ODQT'� liiSM s _3 -
DOES REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY ANDD
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.47-MASAMEND YSTFIEZ3 - _ -
MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND#MEi✓€7tM
30TH DAY OF , 9Q17 -
�'�`/J - !
CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER
AMES M. GELLENTHIN
1, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SUI
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S.
THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUN
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT
OTHER EXCEPTION -M THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVf
I E210 1 132.98 1 N46'54'57"W I
101
909012,11
1551771.42
102
908959.91
1551607,20
103
909080.71
1551595.56
104
909120.34
1551707.19
105
909286.62
1551625.95
106
909358.87
1551629.35
107
909524.90
1551724.98
108
909639.02
1551642.88
109
909674.66
1551553.74
110
909735.86
1551445.31
111
909855.44
1551326.10
112
909917.95
1551289.69
113
909715.98
1551195.17
114
909825.77
1552553.64
115
909787.93
1552619.66
116
909556.88
1552385.00
117
909681.00
1552389.25
118
909780.62
1552424.89
119
909855.98
1552500.92
120
909437.81
1552330.89
121
909430.04
155226 7.75
122
909482.96
1552195.42
123
909426.68
1552015.34
124
909466.95
1551846.30
125
909397.07
1551795.64
126
909285.46
1551762.13
127
909201.89
1551801.35
128
909237.26
1551874.86
129
909219.22
1551974.54
130
909106.54
1552073.10
131
909070.46
1552075,17
132
910322.59
1551290.38
133
910114.46
1551419.22
134
909973.12
1551442.72
135
909953.79
1551453.98
136
909864.39
1551543.10
137
909819.26
1551623.07
138
909770.29
1551745,55
139
909620.19
1551852.08
140
909598.34
1551880.50
141
909560.40
1552010.78
142
909605.99
1552163.34
143
909634.52
1552256.66
144
909730.03
1552340.90
145
910361.92
1551297.82
146
908875.24
1552622,06
147
909008.98
1552078.70
148
908973,58
1552215.96
149
908910.52
1552314.20
150
908923.06
1552511.49
I E210 1 132.98 1 N46'54'57"W I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
YADKIN COUNTY
PRESENTED FOR REGISTRATION AND RECORDED
kJ THIS OFFICE IN BOOK OF MAPS
VGE THIS THE DAY OF
2017.
GISTER OF DEEDS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
�A,- YADKIN COUNTY
$-- s 1��• l/�_ (� MAREVIEW OFFICER
1dE PLAT WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION �,..,
- � FICATION IS AFFIXED
v ' _ 1 QTS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
MwE-� --OCPnonuan
�-_
wr
4 = 7fc-j��P:6ww- \
NOR AROLINA REGISTRATION
1, --JAMES M. GELLENTHIN _
..•
151
9089 70.0 6
1552656.33
152
908896.26
1552637.79
153
906811.02
1552573.99
154
908798.81
1552485.07
155
908811.20
1552394.39
156
908786.48
1552395,30
157
908777.53
1552330.08
158
908858.71
1552298.36
159
908647,06
1552614.14
160
908424.40
1552568.61
161
908 67 2.52
1552316.56
162
908695.39
1552350.76
163
908725.35
1552350.46
164
908748.79
1552341.30
165
908756.89
1552400.34
166
908694.04
1552452.99
167
908646.23
1552525.37
168
908608.95
1552542.88
169
908839.55
1551923.22
170
1 908762.91
1551924.13
171
908526.88
1552 4 64.50
172
908571.18
1552395.23
173
908662.02
1552298.10
174
908751.68
1552265.24
175
908743.21
1552300.65
176
908794.84
1552213.81
177
908850.22
1552132.07
178
908773.70
1552302.16
179
907816.71
1551898.93
180
907826.25
1551696.57
181
907864.95
1551779,20
182
907868.08
1551834.99
183
907983.76
1551870.67
184
908098.20
1551864.58
185
908099.56
1552027.06
186
908048.62
1552151.03
187
907926.60
1552266.28
188
907890.01
1552463,87
189
907930.31
1552551.85
190
907832.43
1552612.68
191
907786.19
155254 3.26
192
908114.22
1551866.66
193
908192.85
1551750.53
194
908188.58
1551456.59
195
908370.83
1552035.12
196
908274.23
1552010.27
197
908180.84
1552066.21
198
908115.56
1552026.86
199
907813.15
1551974.16
200
907769.19
1551961.73
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
YADKIN COUNTY
PRESENTED FOR REGISTRATION AND RECORDED
kJ THIS OFFICE IN BOOK OF MAPS
VGE THIS THE DAY OF
2017.
GISTER OF DEEDS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
�A,- YADKIN COUNTY
$-- s 1��• l/�_ (� MAREVIEW OFFICER
1dE PLAT WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION �,..,
- � FICATION IS AFFIXED
v ' _ 1 QTS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
MwE-� --OCPnonuan
�-_
wr
4 = 7fc-j��P:6ww- \
NOR AROLINA REGISTRATION
1, --JAMES M. GELLENTHIN _
..•
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #1) SPO FILE NO. 99-0
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
Lam' c . W'4 (.--s•
SARA C WOOD DATE
FILED Jun 08, 2017 08:06:22 am
BOOK 00012
PAGE 0210
INSTRUMENT # 02111
FILED FOR RECORD -YADKIN COUNTY NC
ARIC WILHELM, REGISTER OF DEEDS
BEARING
NOTE
L THIISPWDOB NOF N MMUABOUNDI SURVETQMfAINDIfTAAOLMFM8B
TRACFROIARA MADLtCW707ML43BM 1FARSNOT CSiM WTHLSPAL
KAACARV NCMAMM SHOWN Nf1SON WAS DERIVED FROM M HAND WIFSOF
RROOIID N ROWMI COINAT AND MDNfENMT10N FOLM N M FBA
t DISTA MSHDWNAREHOM=ffALORMMDffrMC>3NULSUIIUS,YFBT
UN<Bf OnIERWLY I UM
S. ARM COM PU EDI SY mORDISIM MfMHOD.
A. MMSS CF7HENWA MAlDCOOIR7MCUPORrrOPL1T8MNOffTHCM M
STATS FLMM COOT ftM "sYs , NO M cM DURUM SM (ILD SIL LUM ON
DRFEREfSI&WSMMVA710NMPERFOM®Bill IDVE� =L AIL DaiM MS ARE
MOl!!D UtRii! QiIplW1R4 NOTA
L DEED R FEROK cASSHOWNHEMBON.
L SUlAaFROM MKNOWNAllTMNUII E All SHOWNIDIROIC
7. SUIUBCTFROF<rRiMFMTWUSiWITHENMMSACBS INKINDASZONE7S',
RASED ONFRIER&FOODMQlfM10ERAUMIFS7SO00MOW UMfMW1Y]S6
MIX
L NO UMMNXM UMffV UXAT M FEW== DUR1Ni M CO!>IG[ 0F7}RS
SURVEY.
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #2 & 3) SPO FILE NO. 99-N
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
Oj
O DINKI S DATE
L
PA4JA�'-
CANDICE DINKINS DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #4) SPO FILE NO. 99-P
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LIbLES AS NOTED
.9.AO6Ts• 17
DONALD GRAY MATHIS DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #5) SPO FILE NO. 99-T
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
�-J
BRYCEB SMITHERMAN I 4r DATE
DEANNA SMITHERMAN DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #6 & 8) SPO FILE NO. 99-Q
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
JOSE SAGGEL POZO DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #7) SPO FILE NO. 99-R
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
�I;*I W -PrO.-6ey-1-7
SANTOS POZO DATE
VICINITY MAP
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #9) SPO FILE NO. 99-S (NOT TO SCALE)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT 1 HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
AOS.� /)
. LA001 1 60 9 aeV
ROY D R SELL DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #10) SPO FILE NO. 99-U
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
STEPHEN BAr DATE
* te-
"-w 6
JANE SMITHERMAN BATTY A DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #11) SPO FILE NO. 99-W
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
641-1� 7
ES A SMITHERMAN DATE
/4') .1 A (�' 14�n,
N R SMITHE DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #12) SPO FILE NO. 99-V
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
CHARLES LEE smiTHEWboat DATE
DENISE P SMITHERMAN DATE
FINAL PLAT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
FOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
PROJECT NAME: MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT
DMS PROJECT #: 97136
SPO FILE NOS. 99-N THRU 99-W
EAST BEND TOWNSHIP, YADKIN COUNTY
. NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 11, 2017 1 1" = 300' 1 1 OF 2
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
KC 1 4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
ASSOCIATES OF RALEIGH, NC 27607
NORTH CAROLINA PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]
C-0764
201
9077 02.21
1552 02 4.48
202
907646.73
1551885.01
203
907693.33
1551848.49
204
907680.29
1552037,02
205
907447.05
1552172.00
206
907433.88
1552336.05
207
907384.04
1552332.05
208
907396.13
1552161.46
209
907260.71
1552226.70
210
906787.76
1552423.62
211
906785,49
15522 71.99
212
907213.64
1552099.20
213
907420.34
1552029.90
214
907625.31
1551898.77
215
907798.73
1552278.43
216
907751.99
1552491.91
217
907727.49
1551821.72
218
907652,44
1551669.26
219
907779,32
1551596.34
220
907647.86
1551653.44
221
907581,38
1551568.01
222
907473.65
1551468.28
223
907260.90
1551420.83
224
907013.16
1551323.79
225
906839.76
1551327.55
226
906819.39
1551278.90
227
906917.08
1551118.77
228
907015.41
1551134.23
229
907067,72
1551206.38
230
907306.95
1551293.63
231
907416,13
1551320.93
232
907391.95
1551282.85
233
907572.70
1551286.12
234
907683.55
1551400.68
235
907736.70
1551374.93
236
907755.01
1551412.73
237
907702.54
1551438.15
238
907771.23
1551582.53
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #1) SPO FILE NO. 99-0
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
Lam' c . W'4 (.--s•
SARA C WOOD DATE
FILED Jun 08, 2017 08:06:22 am
BOOK 00012
PAGE 0210
INSTRUMENT # 02111
FILED FOR RECORD -YADKIN COUNTY NC
ARIC WILHELM, REGISTER OF DEEDS
BEARING
NOTE
L THIISPWDOB NOF N MMUABOUNDI SURVETQMfAINDIfTAAOLMFM8B
TRACFROIARA MADLtCW707ML43BM 1FARSNOT CSiM WTHLSPAL
KAACARV NCMAMM SHOWN Nf1SON WAS DERIVED FROM M HAND WIFSOF
RROOIID N ROWMI COINAT AND MDNfENMT10N FOLM N M FBA
t DISTA MSHDWNAREHOM=ffALORMMDffrMC>3NULSUIIUS,YFBT
UN<Bf OnIERWLY I UM
S. ARM COM PU EDI SY mORDISIM MfMHOD.
A. MMSS CF7HENWA MAlDCOOIR7MCUPORrrOPL1T8MNOffTHCM M
STATS FLMM COOT ftM "sYs , NO M cM DURUM SM (ILD SIL LUM ON
DRFEREfSI&WSMMVA710NMPERFOM®Bill IDVE� =L AIL DaiM MS ARE
MOl!!D UtRii! QiIplW1R4 NOTA
L DEED R FEROK cASSHOWNHEMBON.
L SUlAaFROM MKNOWNAllTMNUII E All SHOWNIDIROIC
7. SUIUBCTFROF<rRiMFMTWUSiWITHENMMSACBS INKINDASZONE7S',
RASED ONFRIER&FOODMQlfM10ERAUMIFS7SO00MOW UMfMW1Y]S6
MIX
L NO UMMNXM UMffV UXAT M FEW== DUR1Ni M CO!>IG[ 0F7}RS
SURVEY.
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #2 & 3) SPO FILE NO. 99-N
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
Oj
O DINKI S DATE
L
PA4JA�'-
CANDICE DINKINS DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #4) SPO FILE NO. 99-P
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LIbLES AS NOTED
.9.AO6Ts• 17
DONALD GRAY MATHIS DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #5) SPO FILE NO. 99-T
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
�-J
BRYCEB SMITHERMAN I 4r DATE
DEANNA SMITHERMAN DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #6 & 8) SPO FILE NO. 99-Q
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
JOSE SAGGEL POZO DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #7) SPO FILE NO. 99-R
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
�I;*I W -PrO.-6ey-1-7
SANTOS POZO DATE
VICINITY MAP
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #9) SPO FILE NO. 99-S (NOT TO SCALE)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT 1 HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
AOS.� /)
. LA001 1 60 9 aeV
ROY D R SELL DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #10) SPO FILE NO. 99-U
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
STEPHEN BAr DATE
* te-
"-w 6
JANE SMITHERMAN BATTY A DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #11) SPO FILE NO. 99-W
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
641-1� 7
ES A SMITHERMAN DATE
/4') .1 A (�' 14�n,
N R SMITHE DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION (CE #12) SPO FILE NO. 99-V
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION
OF THE COUNTY OF YADKIN AND THAT I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF
SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK
LINES AS NOTED.
CHARLES LEE smiTHEWboat DATE
DENISE P SMITHERMAN DATE
FINAL PLAT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
FOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
PROJECT NAME: MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT
DMS PROJECT #: 97136
SPO FILE NOS. 99-N THRU 99-W
EAST BEND TOWNSHIP, YADKIN COUNTY
. NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 11, 2017 1 1" = 300' 1 1 OF 2
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
KC 1 4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
ASSOCIATES OF RALEIGH, NC 27607
NORTH CAROLINA PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]
C-0764

DETAIL 1
12.,-2H
FILED Jun 08, 2017 08:07:01 am \
BOOK 00012 \ \
PAGE 0211 \ \ \ �a nr GRID NORTH (NAD 8J) *SITE* SITE
INSTRUMENT# 02112 \
FILED FOR RECORD -YADKIN COUNTY NC \ \ \
ARIC WILHELM, REGISTER OF DEEDS \ \ \
- ci r�yE:r;l f:arzf
1
Syp9� S��e4 ` \
VICINITY MAP
\ \ (NOT TO SCALE)
P.O.B.#5517 W) #58 #69
ACCESS EASEMENT \ \
CE 4A CE4B 0. B. Ess#61 E74 #70 1.5 SAMUEL GOMEZ DB0111(PGd) $N \ \
8,018 SF CE 4C ' P/N.• 595 1 0020 7109 N N/F \
0.1BAC SHOALS ROAD ✓OSE SAMUEL POZO
DB.' 469 PG. 191 JULIA POZO Fre PIN; 595000281701 \
DR
0CE 4C Pl0' AZTEC
DR Fe 306992 PGC 092
3050 AZTEC OR De
6,371 SF 5
CE CA DB.' 1020 PG.* 494 FMF
cc C
C£9IBt9C 1190
O.ISAC p.oe 7af \ ) rsisiesr S�
L25 °A #114 a;VAC
Fre ri 789 #F? JAMES ANSM/THERMAN
PN.. c. 9 e „g 7 ^C ^� ��W �� KAREN R SM/THERMAN
E.1u5.m.se # F, _ N F 11ri 1(✓v'1 N m #216 PIN* 5950274278
/ ea 3633 SHOALS RD
SANTOS POZO ((� A
PIN.- 5950002878 8 `LI � I ���� a.c sIC OB: 1179 PQ' 144 #z,o
#116
It 4"Mr
PFOB 3054 AZTEC DR �'1?AC „1
DB: 284 PG 17 N N E2 3 -
#144 ..172 X20 W W a11AC #206 #207 E256
N /�-
m #'43 "21 SEE N/' #1a7 POP h N -
`� ^y0 ROY D RUSSELL y0 n Of "c CE11A W w 5 #211
14 G 1 AI L'i N. 595000282332 F'� W E25 yzos
JOSE SAMUEL POZO 4 22 u SHOALS RD 17,1825F #205 #zoa ,Zg6
P!N' 5950291625 1142 P Qc DB.- 0487 PG.- 0338 #, 88 0.39AC
3045 AZTEC DR t; Maoe72sa7 N L38
E139 18
OB.' 332 PG. 802 m l #130 3r #147 ss2aszz7 E97 192 �19 �? STIE) A2tz
rro�w CEM #195 4 �ryA 43 .. #201 \ #204 a 299
#141 #123 1 ' _ J S� ip 179A #185 - POB
�y n,, 41 #129 E20 m4244' F'�• #196 _ : m cr '<•12e #199 60 JAMES A SM/THERMAN
eeNr N rn ; N N..9D7Jib:7) " h 1 rr1 1 KAREN R SM/Ti1ERMA
6i� M M 264AC #169 E207 w a19AC #93 N N 53/89e93 �1 4 200 N j.
CE11B PIN., 595000168998
D
N F f.L VB W W yr r' .. O i� #9t Pte° F � ii. P 3633 SHOALS RD
slow DONALD GRAY MA THIS IMMIJ."Sf .pro^ #140 #tza W N r"° � r' � Po - E227 #179 �. s0 k #214 1"747SF
PIN. 595100109505 463AC 4, X124 Aa N - ar -#61s2 ; „1e4 #tai 1az: ss 6 ryzo3#zoz 1� B. ?BB PG 198
4147 SHADY GROVE ' 166 139 #a1 #125 #12 -^ Ei7j #as y #90 ' A94 : -ry7 N M �ry #217
CHURCH ROAD Aso zs ~ 1 95 Er L37 N N
DB.' 899 PG.' 230 #138 1kg F9A E14s e 0 E9�`( #101 E106 #too 1 � A 1 � A 3 (TIE) # w
05 #62 1 E9 5/# -` -: oA95 �• �� 79 .# 161�� L39
EX1S71NC 7ph F" 10 3 4. Eti42 CE1�B#180 (nE)
40' POA#ERLINE W ho' 179 .�1 Fj1? 1 �' #'�7 E702 #96 921 zzoP.ae
EASEMENT .� #1 os „6 'a N,1r
v
#1 37 ^ r� 111 #105 #toe A _ 117„S76Sf �' 9 F. CHARLES LEE SM/THERMA
i— E 08 N w ZMAC #219 �� DENISE P SMINERMAN
SO
op ' 136 7a A109 CESA #103 N/F #113 CE 12A 0239 #221 4508 PIN.-5.950173154
GROVE JCHURCH
N/F I BRYC£ B SM{TH£RMAN CESS RD NOcs MON EA
JOEL & CAND/GE # 13 E'`rO 749 ✓R & DEANNA SM{THERMAN c� - DB 1179 PG: 130 /
59 32,103 SF BEND (FZ7787
DINKINS # ry �` <v 7.01 AC ! N. M 0. so
I 16 n P/N.' 5950195015 #1t4 #, y4 0.74AC - Y2 f2 G/55387493
PIN: 595100112104 I # E161 m #1t0 SHADY GROVE CH RD au AC r.o.e 238 28�--.#.237 73 #223 CE12B CSF. 0.99996862
yz34 - - E?7 155,154 SF �#A
4209 SHADY GROVE ' I #134 176 6 P.oPc cFs OB.' 1179 PG.' 137 -5B #238 -
CHURCH ROAD resc OF Sa drp51 �. $5 - 4 3.79AC
DB: 984 PG. 513 1I E80 �hry 4, er35/4u70 Lie G � \\ . -
I 175 4r/1 #111 ^ #235 #231 ` 24 E275 #225
1 F J Lib L19 L20 ?tE 53?0 ACCP
#233 E28.3 rw #2321230 _ 01 0226 SS LOCA T/
142 - - - - N E? 'V
J
L15(TIE) TRACY ANN AND EDWARD /" r 60 O
± M66 SM/7H£RMAN t+? #229 /
PIN: 594000998002
#41 - E - 4248 SHADY GROVE CHURCH RD NIP
C 38 y44 1. 71 t�.r Fre DB• 11E PC., 69 DA ND L M/TH£RMAN N� - #226 E278 #227 F�
1y�1c SEE PIN.- 595000089139 ✓ANSA/ YMET7 NR AN
ZMAC ♦ti DETAIP 4325 SHADY GROVE CH RD STEPHEN 5612
� 1a7 OB: 307 PG 307 PIN 595018872?
7w .i N/F • o N1
4341DB: 1179Y PG- 1 1 r>e
BFNI
Pae - 4t SHADY GROVE METHODIST GUY V SMITHERMAN ✓R
`,E 3A cE .1e\ �ti CHURCH CAROL YN SM/THERMAN
3=7Sr \) n P/N. 540 PG: 694 NDF P/M 595000089522 / �'J R/D
� 39 N/F OB.' ?40 PC.' 694 MICHAEL C & DENISE P WOOD 4305 SHADY GROVE CH r'
a71AC #37 JOY L/NEBERRY ^° PIN: 595000097299 DB. 301 PG.' 440
B"•".
PIN., 595700006367 R 4325 SHADY GROVE CH RD
E3 d f4` HU/QCH DB: 476 PG: 294 F /NSR
•"'"`=`' #45 4217 SHADY GROVE RD r
OB: 1031 PG- 004
/V/F \� #zs �ry9 - E-3 #45 n' Fl° 1"� N/F / /`/GT`
JOEL &LAND/CE - ry� k0.'•• #3a BENNY F SADIE WOOD Ela f e /
DINKlNS \\ \ _ _ Azo ? 1/2 Sao i f_ PIN: 595000095873 I
P/N: 595100015820 - - - \ �� y e r,, / 4 E1' 7e4O DB 270 PC 863
EX/ST/NG E2
oo f.2 .n9rOI3le9 E.uso7au7s
DB.' 326 PG 790 40'PoMERUNE #25 �' C-1"74d2z /V/F
#35 . +rE 126 \• / :• CP \ / /
EASEMENT #3 '�: 27 ( SARA C 0091 SARA C 0094 \ \ DETAIL 2
E �\~\ / P/N.' 595000091858 P/N.' 595000094255
3z j3S� <�9x• G 4236 SHADY GROVE CHURCH R DB.' 13E PG. 186 \ / \
P.O..a FAY 9 r�. DB. 1JE PG' 186
. a� L6(TIE) OyN Mala3ss/ OCFJ` a i� /
lye c9T \ 4/
12
F, FIB
CE SA
NAF � C ZB f
JOEL D/NK/NS N/F \ �w 117 W L33 C� 7 & 8 19,314 SF /�/• �(�
PIN.' S95fi00015820 �i11 I JOHN R BEAN �` (TIE) 11908877.24 A{rG,E.7J
SHADY GROVE CHURCH ROAD - 1.47AC ` P/N: 595100001 1 #3 E. 1552661.22 0.44 AC
{J7�_W DB. 213 PC.• 895 #,6 - EASEMENT
OB: 326 PG 790 :\ y34 ' �5 #151 E783
N/F #12 - 04 #152 746 3A (Af #159 OB PG
133 .I CHRISTINA HUTCHENS E1� eG. )
I P/N� 595100909479 17, At5 POB Z11 -61131
I i B: 7157 PG 349 0 110 ��R trr�' C 1A + CE BB 7n�o 0194 ' /P
FINAL PLAT
4 � � GE 7 POB m5 # 68 #16G CONSERVATION EASEMENT
N� 4.•y� • ,N/F I lam. #5'#150 w #lfi7`Lp2 - �1�v1 FOR
.�; • CLIFFORD POWELL �^ � CE 8B STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PIN: 594 1 0091 7201 L4(nE) ►ti - - - �y • - #t5 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
'.
OR: 326 PG.' 59 I � �• I
122#2 POD
1 WE TIE) m #166 #171 40,684 SF DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
m I �ry��CE 9B 0.93AC PROJECT NAME: MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT
�. CE
NAF #tse#E560 #165 >° PE ,^ #172 DMS PROJECT M 97136
;` EDWARD &TRACY ANN m r»; 14 E21 'Y
LEGEND I g631Sf SMITHERMAN m W: �96El #162 o SPO FILE NO. 99-11 THRU $9-W
a15Ac P/N. 594000998002 #757 #1 �� #16' EAST BEND TOWNSHIP, YADKIN COUNTY
• EXISTING PK NAIL 1.4 I I 4248 S AL)Y GR VE CHURCH RD #749 E220 N t64 �s
i' I - 2 N :1J #120. - F/P NORTH CAROLINA
Q• EXISTING IRON a '� N/F #158 6 #178 : #'.75 #173 1
NOEL J WOOD JR ESTATE �ry W DATE: SCALE: SHEET:
® 5/8"*30" REBAR SET W/3.2.5".iALUMINUM}'_ ' ` P/N: 594100807114 h:;#174 CE 9B JANUARY 11, 2017 1" = 300 2 OF 2
CAP WITH STATE SEAL • DB.' 13E PG. 186 w L,
O CALCULATED POINT X748 936SF
o EXISTING MONUMENT 1t ':� POS CE9C 0.18AC KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
GRAPHIC SCALE CE 9C
NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR W
w61
is ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
"DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES" 300 0 Iso 300 soo �ry
#1�7 .23AC
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT CROSSING LOCATION - CE 9A 725.67 KCI 4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING 'rte' E. 9052062. 33 #g ASSOCIATES OF RALEIGH, NC 27607
P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT , INCH = 300 FEET FIB NORTH CAROLINA PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]
C-0764

12.4 Credit Release Schedule
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the final design plans unless
otherwise documented and provided to the Interagency Review Team following construction. Under no
circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA authorization has been
received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the
project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project. The
DE, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have
been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where some
performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the specifics of the
case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to which the site
fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project credits will be subject to the
criteria described as follows:
Stream Credit Release Schedule — 7 year Timeframe
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements below
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
50%
standards are being met
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
60%
standards are being met
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
5%
65% (75%*)
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
75% (85%*)
standards are being met
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
5%
80% (90%*)
standards are being met
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
10%
90% (100%*)
being met, and project has received close-out approval from IRT
*See Subsequent Credit Releases description below
Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the NCDMS
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; Per the NCDMS Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
report has been produced. As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA permit
issuance is not required
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream project with a 7-year
monitoring period, a reserve of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull
events have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance
standards are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period,
release of these reserve credits shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones
associated with credit release, the NCDMS will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with
documentation substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation
will be included with the annual monitoring report.
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

12.5 Financial Assurance
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service's In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (formerly NCDENR) has
provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects
to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS. This commitment provides financial assurance for all
mitigation projects implemented by the program.
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

12.6 Maintenance Plan
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

The site will be monitored on a regular basis, with a physical inspection of the site conducted a minimum
of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until performance standards are
met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance.
Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction and
may include the following. Maintenance needs or actions will be recorded in the annual monitoring
reports. See the Section 12.9 for more information on invasive species.
Planned Maintenance
Component/Feature
Maintenance Through Project Close -Out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include securing of loose coir
matting and supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the
Stream
channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows intercept the channel (such as the
proposed water quality treatment areas) may also require maintenance to prevent bank
failures, knick points, and erosion.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
Vegetation
community. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
Site Boundary
bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or
conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be
repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis up until the project is closed out.
The site will be monitored for the presence of beaver. Adaptive management approaches
Beaver Control
will be used to evaluate whether or not beaver or their structures should be controlled at
the site.
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

12.7 Stream and Wetland Delineation (Incl. Stream Identification Forms)
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

===MF4�
mmmra�
mmmb�
mmmmlb�
mmmmma�
KCI
ASS0CU%TES OF NC
150 90012008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
November 14, 2016
Mr. William Elliott
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Elliott;
KCI has completed a delineation of streams and wetlands for the above referenced project. The
attached information, including required forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review and
determination of jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Project Description & Methodology
As shown in Figure 1, the Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site is located in Yadkin County, NC within
the Yadkin River Basin (USGS HUC 03040101). This restoration will be done for the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee Program. This delineation was performed in
compliance with methodology set forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland
Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Regional Supplement. Streams were assessed for jurisdiction under the CWA using field
indications of ordinary high water mark and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11.
Wetlands were delineated using survey flagging at regular locations along the wetland -upland
boundary. All boundaries either form complete polygons, tie to surface water features such as streams
or ponds, or tie to the edge of the study area. Streams points were collected using sub -meter GPS
technology at representative points to depict center lines. Wetland Determination Forms were
completed for each type of wetland community encountered.
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM www, xct. COM

Delineation Results
Figure 2 is presented using the East Bend US Geological Survey 1:24,000 Quadrangle Map. Figure 3
presents the results of the delineation, including streams and wetlands overlaid on 2014 Statewide
Aerial Photographs.
Table 1 presents detailed information on the jurisdictional stream within the study area, including
status (intermittent or perennial), length, width, NCDWQ Score, and latitude/longitude. Based on
field data, approximately 12,921 linear feet of stream are present within the study area. Table 2
presents detailed information on each wetland feature including NC Wetland Assessment Method
type, Hydrologic Class, Cowardin Class, size, representative wetland delineation form identification,
and latitude/longitude. Based on field data, there are approximately 0.43 acres of wetlands and 0.44
acres of pond present within the study area.
We respectfully request your review of this information, so that a preliminary jurisdictional
determination under the CWA may be obtained. If you have any questions, need additional
information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me at your earliest convenience at
[phone] or Joe. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Joseph Sullivan
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
- Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Request Form
- Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
- Table 1: Stream Summary Table
- Table 2: Wetland Summary Table
- Table 3: Surface Water Summary Table
- Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- Figure 2: USGS Map
- Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
- Stream and Wetland Data Forms
- Offers to Purchase Easement Restrictions
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM www. KCI. COM

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: East of Shady Grove Church Road and West of Shoals Road
City, State: East Bend, NC
County: Yadkin
Directions: From Raleigh, take 1-40 west towards Greensboro. Take exit 188 to US -421 north.
Take exit 244. Take Conrad Rd, Old U.S. 421 and Flint Hill Rd to Shady Grove Church Rd.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 595100015820, 595100112104, 595100109505, 595000282701, 5950291625,
595000281888,595000282332.5950273465 595000194361,595000091858
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Joe Sullivan, KCI Technologies Inc.
Mailing Address: 4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Addressl: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Multiple - See Attached Offers to Purchase Easement Restrictions
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
3:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION`'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See Offers to Purchase Easement Restrictions
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
IvJ
❑✓
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 36.92
acres
Irl I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑� Project Coordinates: 36.2393 Latitude -80.5199 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
W1 Aerial Photography of the project area
7 USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than l Ixl7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http:/Iwww.usace.armV.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&proupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/pubIicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
F] Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
F] Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
F] Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
F] Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F] Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OH WM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundaryis s depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
F] When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
F] include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Joe Sullivan, KCI Technologies Inc.
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
East of Shady Grove Church Road and West of Shoals Road, East Bend NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Yadkin
City: East Bend
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.2393 ON; Long, -80.5199
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hall Creek
OW.
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
12,921 linear feet: 6 width (ft) and/or 1.78 acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent Perennial
Wetlands: 0.43 acres.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
THAT
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
✓❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant: vicinity Map
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
'H Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 124K East Bend
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑-
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 NC statewide Aerial Photographs or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
AJA,Y4� I 1 ([.
gnat re and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site Stream Summary Table November 2016
Table 1.
Stream Name
Stream Status
Length
(Feet)
Width
(Feet)
NCDWQ
Score
Latitude
Longitude
UT to Hall Creek (UTHC)
Perennial
6,130
7
-
36.2415
-80.5219
T1
Perennial
757
5
41
36.2347
-80.5200
T1A
Perennial
744
5
-
36.2337
-80.5210
T2
Perennial
616
5
32
36.2351
-80.5183
T3
Perennial
346
4
35
36.2360
-80.5198
T4
Intermittent
171
4
26
36.2372
-80.5200
T5
Perennial
1,174
5
37.5
36.2378
-80.5183
T513
Perennial
321
4
32
36.2377
-80.5175
T6
Perennial
638
6
32/33.5
36.2395
-80.5190
T6A
Perennial
123
4
-
36.2395
-80.5182
T7
Perennial
468
6
40.5
36.2409
-80.5217
T8
Perennial
888
5
36.5
36.2408
-80.5258
T8A
Perennial
222
5
-
36.2415
-80.5261
T9
Perennial
124
5
39.5
36.2431
-80.5215
Drain 2
Intermittent
199
5
20
36.2422
-80.5217
Page 1 of 2

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site Wetland and Surface Water
Summary Tables
Table 2.
November 2016
Wetland
ID
NCWAM
Hydrologic
Class
Cowardin
Class
Size
(Acres)
USACE Forms
WET UP
Latitude
Longitude
WA
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.11
X
X
36.2408
-80.5218
WB
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.03
WA
WA
36.2390
-80.5202
WC
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM
0.10
WA
WA
36.2360
-80.5205
WE
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.07
N/A
WA
36.2397
-80.5181
WG
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PSS
0.01
X
X
36.2404
-80.5248
WH
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.06
WG
WG
36.2410
-80.5260
WI
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.02
WG
WG
36.2411
-80.5261
WJ
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO
0.02
WG
WG
36.2413
-80.5262
WK
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PSS
0.01
WG
WG
36.2416
-80.5256
Table 2.
Pond
ID
Isolated
(Y/N)
Size
(Acres)
Latitude
Longitude
PA
No
0.44
36.2396
-80.5185
X = Data Forms Completed
N/A = Wetland Forms not completed due to animal interference.
PFO = Palustrine Forested; PSS = Palustrine Scrub -Shrub; PEM = Palustrine Emergent
Page 2 of 2

SURRY O
X
m
CO)
r -
X 52
m
Cn
O
�S `ver
�,S, Prarat
IREDELL DAVIE
C9
OLF
cy
G,p
ny
67
EAST BEND
i
QCounty Boundary
Project Site Location
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Major Rivers
Cities and Towns
PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0 0.75 1.5 MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION SITE
Miles YADKIN COUNTY, NC

goo .
t ti
vv r
ip
Q Project Easement ti� IV. 4 r ✓✓✓fff 1 � � �• � IfiS
FIGURE 2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP N
0 500 1,000 MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION SITE Source: USGS DRG,
Feet East Bend Quad.
YADKIN COUNTY, NC

-
WJ
� fid' WA
WH WG 3
.. ;.17 { f
li
New* R
{ �1
IMP 4r�
.
..f,-fr
i,ry ,p - ~ 1
qr
e�`} i
�� .t k} •� �� ` �• 7t'SK�'� �,:t� � .�, `moi__
.:� , � " ,� T M1• f � j "fir '�s'
Ar
*
1A
r
�- r� � � __ .i. -.� .�i ._L � , •tip. �
!� 0 Project Easement Wetlands 400 200 0 400 N Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
Ephemeral Channels Pond Feet Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
" E
Intermittent Streams Yadkin County, NC
T Image Source: NC OneMap
1 Perennial Streams 2014 Aerial Imagery S November 2016
ASSOCIATES OF NC

NC DWO Stream identiifiratinn Form VPrvinn A 11
Date: j' 'k
Project/Site: H,,J/ 5J0 -/-V1
Latitude:
Evaluator: FI
County:
Longitude:
Total is Points:
Stream is at least it
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral lnterrnittent erenni
�
Other
e. Quad Name:
l a 30*ent
if _ 9S or perennial it z 3p'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3•
H. Ueomor nolo Subtotal = --4-'
Absent
Weak
1 Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
0.5
0
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
1.
4_ Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
S. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0 -5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na = 0
0.5
Yes = 3
1.5
.,.. .......... ............ ...r .•tea gra r. • rr ria ...esu iosisPi
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= I �-
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
lcyes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
to
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
o
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 0_9er = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual
Motes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: / � ��
ProjecVSite: �� S��e
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points: J
Stream Determination (circ
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent eren ial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
V
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
C2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
25. Algae 0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
Other 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
)
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Sketch:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
4No=
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see di sions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal T)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0. 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = L -�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.�
Other 0
`perennial streams ay also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1113116
ProjectiSite: MY 3 je- -f 3
Latitude:
Evaluator: AF,73
County: (NdKiA
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (c(
1
Other
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Pere�nnia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
S)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
(20
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = GI )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
S)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biolow (Subtotal = G, )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: '� 6
ProjectlSite:{� i•�
Latitude:
Evaluator: /�� \
/ `
County: YC �
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Dete m ation (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemer Intermi t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
(3)
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
IoL
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
©
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(3)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
tJ
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
d
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
Cl)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
M
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
co
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =O
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1�� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
V
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
a
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
22. Fish Q>
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
U
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
.2)
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks @5
1
2
3
22. Fish Q>
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
ther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 'b
Project/Site: H, 11 Siff T4
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera ntermi e t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
v
1�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-I ±L-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yes = 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
FACW = 0.75;
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Sketch:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channelNo
=
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see di ussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 Qij
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed U>
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: f / I WIG
Projectl5ite: �1 ,'J1 s jq -rs
Latitude:
Evaluator. A ' T�
County: Y VKj h
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream determination (circle on
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 orperennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad (Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = (L • ' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15_ Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(_1D
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
LTJ
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
W
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual "
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = tl )
12. Presence of Baseflow,
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15_ Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 ❑.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = ❑
es =
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = (a 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
❑
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
4
20. Maerobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
❑
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
of
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
❑
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
❑
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetiand plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5Other
= 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectlSite: ffqJ j SU/15A
Latitude:
Evaluator: A F
County: �� � � A
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent 3 7
5 etermination (circle one)
Other
if a 19 orperennial if a 30`
hemera ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = io
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
g.2
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uenceL0
J
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
.�Oj
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = la
Yes = 3
Sketch:
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = -i's )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
❑
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 1
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0. i
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0 1Yes
= 3
C. Biolovv (Subtotal= 4�->%> >f
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
.�Oj
0
0.2
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.-7-53
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Nates:
Sketch:

T5A-
NC DWO St•TP.S M TdInt-ifiratinn Vrwvvi 17nr - d 11
Date: 1 i ��
Project/Site: tll �Am Gale , '
Mill
Latitude:
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Evaluator: 5� U
County: # n
Longitude:
Total Points:
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1.5
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Deter ' ircle one
Ephemeral termittent
Other
if, -e
if z 79 orperennial if , -e 30"
p erennial
e, Quad Name:
9�
L
H, uvurnur nuio (Jubtotai = y )
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
I Absent
p
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
p
2
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1.5
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
01
t 0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
��
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
'Q
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
i' 0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
°5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0!
0.5'`)
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
R_ Hvrirnlnnv tSiihtntai = -49
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
�
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
t 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5}
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
d
No = 0
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2HV3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
' 3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
122.
Fish
0.523.
Crayfish
d
0.524.
Amphibians
0
0.525.
Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75;
PBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i �t _ <�
'tn �. ,. C
�:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: i 1 j 3f j�
ProjectlSite: ffa f f 5
Latitude:
Evaluator: '4r- T
County: �&d j ; fl
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circ ne
Other
3
Ephemera! Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 1 S orperennial if a 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
0
3
6. depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Fleadcuts
0
1
2
CD
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = ' }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
[3�)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
CID
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos [note diversity and abundance]
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
%FACW
= 0.75; DBL = 1.5
Cher
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercion 4.11
Date: x (13 / 1 �
Project/Site: -} 4J1 Sit-tT 4 -t p
Latitude:
Evaluator: Av TS
County: YA)(C; A
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (ci
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if 2:30* )
E heeral Intermittent Peia
Pmrenn
e.g. Quad Name:
Til
A. veomor nolo (Subtotal =--L )
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
Uo
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 1
0.5
1 11.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
ua1c nUL 10LUU, aoC U15UUSSIUII, Ifl RlanUal
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = a • 5 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
V,. DIUIUUV IJuDtotal = `) 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
Uo
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 1
0.5
1
1.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4.11
Date: / (/((Q
Project/Site: b
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��C)
County: y6itc A
Longitude:
Total Points: G
Stream is at least intermittent 3 3 J
Stream Determination (circl o
Other
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
G
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = L L , J )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
No = 0
es = 3
2
1
3
1.5
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a .fi .
No = 0
Yes = 3
arta cal ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrolow (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
U. DivlOgy (JUDtotal = h )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0 1
I OT
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
0
0.5
0.5
FACW = 0.75;
1 1
1 1
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
1.5
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Versinn 4.11
Date: t/1 3/1L
Project/Site: 516/-T -7
Latitude:
Evaluator: Ar,75
`HAW
County: 1(t�O Kw�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Steam is at least intermittentO CJ-
Stream Determination (circle onal
Ephemeral Intermitter
Other
if _ 19 or perennial if 2 30*
Perenni
e.g, Quad Name:
"I c
H. ueomor nolo (Subtotal = f'J )
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0(717-2
2 3
14. Leaf litter
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
QV
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
= u11aa1 u-11vo aic nUi 10MU, b= wswbsiUns m manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 3.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1,
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes =
lr. DIUIUC]v toumotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0J
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I/ 1311ro
Project/Site: tYVI 53e t
Latitude:
Evaluator: A F J
County: �A)K� n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Steam is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if _ 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent erenni
e. Quad Name:
9•
H. ueomor nolo (Subtotal = )
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
No = 0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
1.5
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = E3
al uutdar unur res arc ndt rated, sec dibuussluns In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Op
0.5
1
1.5-
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes =
1.5
U. urology (Subtotal = e )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
C 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
W
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 ther = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/13116
Project/Site: tiAtf 5;K
Latitude:
Evaluator: AF } 5
County: Y tKI
�4
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
q
circle one)
Stream Det�Intermitt
Other
if z 19 or perennial if 2:30* 1 i
Ephemeralen Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
t
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = (o )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
<ZU
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
CO)1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
Cy
0.5
1
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0 0.5
C-10
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
0.5
es =P
C. Biolow (Subtotal = 1� )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/13/16
Project/Site: H j1 -j
Latitude:
Evaluator: A- F- T S
County: y,,,JK,'n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream9 is intermittent �j q 5
e one
Stream Determination (c�e'
Other
or masaleast if2t3
if 2:19 or erennial if z 30`
Ephemeral Intermittentrennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. ueomor nolo (Subtotal = v -D )
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
23
J
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
43
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1.5
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
Notes:
11. Second or greater order channel
a 1:�_•_
No = 0
Yes = 3
aIllmai uracnca ale nUi iaicu, bou w5uussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ?,3 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
QV
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
-17-.Soil-based
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = (7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern (Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: /-,\J1 PC, City/County: �fn�A � " �4 Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: 1 r State: _�� Sampling Point: W — w
Investigator(s): J, )J I JAiAn v 1 ,-Wfi%e( Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Pc�)dj)IAI\ Local relli (concave, onvex, none): Slope (%): "
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)): ` ��b ' Lac a I U D J Long: �a !i Datum: NUM
Soil Map Unit Name: Chi(` V;Q.L.I CA'Al dq 100l"'1 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) v
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? ,A Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes /` No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes \7`/ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
Remarks:
We}Ia,\d �A5 [xei IMe,cee
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required* check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
'-,- High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
% Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_- Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):_
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):_
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: \
_r
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
20% of total cover:
v
Tree S atum (Plot size: i )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. AU4 erm�6`
.� &
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2. JATotal
_
LL
4. (G r ) i JC1'e-&
5. t164ebr,rRCehsy
Number of Dominant
3
5
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
5
08
8. Rvbus AL%LiuS
.
Percent of Dominant Species
r
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
7
jib = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:_ OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: � o •) FACW species x2=
1. Al A uS r r^ J q�G DAL FAC species x 3 =
2 l; y,uSTr 5'^� i FACU species x 4=
3.
6.
7.
11.
�= Total Cover
(Plot o�al cover:)S n 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size:
2 u
3.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: <
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
// ('�O = Total Cover(—
C7
of total cover:
20% of total cover:
v
�50%
Herb Stratum
44 (Plot size:
2. TArc m f q,-,
3. /tMk(PArceH r^CiPn+moi
4. (G r ) i JC1'e-&
5. t164ebr,rRCehsy
)o
6. T �_,M„i�0A<' t%A t11
5
QC.W
7. C; cviti \\"C-uI S
5
08
8. Rvbus AL%LiuS
.
11.
�= Total Cover
(Plot o�al cover:)S n 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size:
2 u
3.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: <
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA- --c7-
Profile
c -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
`A 96
2.5YRL1/6 to L
6 rn y k 4/1 �
t0 Yl� 5_/c � b
60
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _Y1_ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

w up
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern
�%�Mountains and Piedmont Region /
Project/Site: M i // �Ja ,,.t C r� r ) City/County: lwof-4� Sampling Date: �` 0I//6
ApplicanUOwner: // C1 State: Al • Sampling Point: \•,nZ f f D
Investigator(s): vtq, �T ',eeli,\q(o! Section, Township, Range: �T
J
Landfor hillslope terrace, etc.): LLocal relief concave convex, no(ne): 1 Slope (%): —2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ?' % ) Lat: �• I V Long: 40 5G 1 1 Datum: NA )
Soil Map Unit Name: kir iew sw,n y CW IC-awt NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No—s�— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No �\ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No:w::
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
x
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No /
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
-� ADSOute uommant Inaicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: % Cover S ecies? Status
2. C., ° I bP
7
- = Total Cover
50% of tota cover:1�_ 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: rA
1. C ' GtrS�(y� �. no �1 S ' y- IR
7
8
9.
Multiply by:
� 0
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
= Total Cover a
C✓
x3=
5 % of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
Herb Stratum( Plot size:
Column Totals:
�
Prevalence Index =
1. "1nlc�n•n.�+� CnV>>,k'ijC'
✓J
I,TL�
2. �JR*wrar, Aru
di'AcB"s
QGY
3. Ud+n( LA
, r rnT b�-
UPI -
4. Gn% t
>'rh ry dol UV�
5. V V.S °tf�V�US
�C
fY'U�
���
6. &,ftIIAX
h f) r4- -noy-
7.
8.
"I
I (P = Total Cover
50% of total cover: ! r� _ 20% of total cover: RD
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. nn q
2.
3.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
-A
Sampling Point: -v /-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W4-14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type'Loc Texture Remarks
7,5 YR V
U
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Noy\
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Mi V°Ir,\ CwC•Q. City/County: Yhd iA'n Sampling Date: PN/16
Applicant/Owner: f—L- _ State: NG Sampling Point:
r
Investigator(s): 7�� �'�°In P i WY Section, Township, Range:
v
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Poo d P Wn r� 1Local relief concave Convex, none)): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P- 13b /� Lat ��• 0 t J I Long: , 5_d, Datum: NNt�
Soil Map Unit Name: FFfrV1DPW Or',Z 0 y �r+�{ lei M NWI classification: Pio
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? A)b Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? M0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes '7' No Is the Sampled Area �{
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes r No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
%K Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
I
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: i,,/F-V,d-
r
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: (/ )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
8.
1. CAP - I /l N S CGI 01 i n cls.-
10
f
VAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2. (y)C(x5 liar l-
ly
d 7 =Total Cover
Qo
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum
20% of total cover:
Total Number of Dominant Q
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Species Across All Strata: U
(B)
4.
3.
R G�; a c tn) f l r r..
D 6(n
AC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
C?5m�rc)� e,g�. l5'
Percent of Dominant Species
SRL
5.
Definitions of "Four Vegetation Strata:
4. ,i
5. �GX (YIy�IOn fC�),�cv� 1 r% AC
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (G
(A/B)
6.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
50% of total
�� 20% of
total cover:
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
OBL species x 1 =
.clover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �� ��V
)
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
FACW species x 2 =
1. 4 910' In r, n --7: ID i O
(�
11.
f"e�r
C w
FAC species x 3 =
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
less than ft
2. (Y u , J in a
5U
= Total Cover
1; O 20% of total cover: lao
of size, and woody plants 3.28 tall.
FACU species x 4 =
�S
v �
3. L , n') &,/)fo n (;Lj t ao,
S
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
�AW
UPL species x 5 =
)
4. jAi �I iG ly
✓
height.
N�
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
5.
2.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5• Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
g.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
d 7 =Total Cover
Qo
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
(Plot size: )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
R G�; a c tn) f l r r..
D 6(n
AC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
C?5m�rc)� e,g�. l5'
tb
SRL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of "Four Vegetation Strata:
4. ,i
5. �GX (YIy�IOn fC�),�cv� 1 r% AC
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
less than ft
50% -of total cover:
= Total Cover
1; O 20% of total cover: lao
of size, and woody plants 3.28 tall.
�S
v �
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody
Vine Stratum ( Plot size:
)
height.
1.
nOn 2,
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5• Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist) %
�- 3
�1)�R & ion
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Sampling Point: w r- - Uc; -
Texture Remarks
L
5 L -
5L
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern JMountains and Piedmont Region %
Project/Site: A «l/ Dm C( -e /
-P City/County: cot Kin Sampling Date:
ApplicanUOwner: f -C-1 .4 State: N C- Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): S- 5d1fiyAn �, JnP �I�hO� Section, Township, Range:
Landformillslope terrace, etc.): 2 J Lo//cal relief (concave, convex, one): Slope (A%): S
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P- J Laat �b Long: -JO. 5ay� Datum: AA 1% 0
r
Soil Map Unit Name: f �i t k/l ey 04014 Qv sq,,,, ,/ IGci rn NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �,-- No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yesy No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? 4 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No\IC
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No N Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Z Depth (inches):
No "fJ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: \v/ U
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Pr 5 E _ /ALV That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. C r �' �_ A� u
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: S a (A/B)
7
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total
50% of total cover: -dsj
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW
Saolino/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: G� t. )
vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
WightA
species x2=
1.
COfA115 {)of,dam
AW
FAC species x3=
2
l ;,V)" Ci GAP 7/)
36
1 AC
FACU species x4=
3.
3.
r AL
UPL species x 5 =
4.
�'Td-jto,r -twi0 i'r ,y-
fAf,,U
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
z r
b
LU
8.
(�wrL�l. �l�a
I b
M(T)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9"
�!
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
= Total Cover
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
20%
of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1.
Nw alb o.
-o
�'
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
ri.ut
2.
�(nSC�nMS e.nn� t/ceJGCn
5
rt�tn%
3.
//
( i,Ata hrl, 7
��
��C
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5
f W
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5.
('� o hs ✓x a ��'^�f �"
N4*6n4Sui"
r�
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.
v GG
10
_
(
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
�kC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total
�'F 20% of total cover:_
Woody
/cover:
Vine Stratum size: 319� 4
)
vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
WightA
(Plot .
r
C,.
U
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation Y
I V = Total Cover .
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvge Loc
Texture Remarks
54 10
TD k b/3
_0
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WG w�f
IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region r
Project/Site: M' lI D, rv/ �e{ �L City/County: �k�l ,`I Sampling Date: V (-d\`I
/'b
Applicant/Owner: C 1 State: c Sampling Point: U✓
Investigator(s): -1. ')u l hAr\ T 1 . > elk I i WO,- Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Mof nW,i Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLR_A): - �3 �La[: �` 1 U� Long: ' O4y S a.L0C Datum: A) PC
Soil Map Unit Name: bW VkeW OftAV? 1.1 4t1" e k d, 10a NWI classification: r i�f
J L `t
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
r
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? 00 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes —Y, No
Remarks:��l
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (1136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
X Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
'� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
/ Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 L ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
5.
7
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �I 1
1. 4 042
2.
3.
7.
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1-
2.-
3.—
.2.3. _,. I_Zk5 P tiS
4.S�I�dgGf�
5. Gr,AA4'ms GrO�a 5
rA
Kw
by
1k -W
(
AIL
FMW
ML_
0RL
Q) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: '20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. n c
2.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: . ,f
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
A
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Sampling Point: L,/ C, - f
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TypeLoc Texture Remarks
'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes —L No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
�/� /
Project/Site: All ll D, M Chef City/County: l�C� �t 1 Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner: V CL _ State: Sampling Point: W1�
Investigators : 7,I IOJHn ` �Q�i�uOr Section, Township, Range:
—
J
Landform ills 4e, terrace, etc.): I Local relief (concave, convex, i`o�n�ier�: f —7 Slope (%): S�_
Subregion (LRR or MLRAZ: f `� ) /1 Lat: �,ib. ���3 Long: Il" `� a� 1 Datum: Nh ID �3
Soil Map Unit Name:
iq)�V,ew giA�e�� 1\tnP �zth1�! Id�1r`� NWlclassifiication: �'
J 1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? N Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nom within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (A1) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): "
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoNX1
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicato.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: t �- ) % Cover Species? Status
1
= Total Cover
50% of tt7llLcover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: \�1-1 1
1. 15;APA S?
2. Rh, 01, Ara I1,iyS o Y
3. �XvQrr�g�D� 10 fhCU
7.
8.
9.
Multiply by:
Number of Dominant Species
a
b T = Total Coversn rr\
'tel
_ 55/110% of total cover:
rL
20% of total cover:
x 3 =
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
I-
Species Across All Strata:
1. :t o(pnPrcuj citur\ciinrN[Pt,
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
2. IAJS AfcuA%)(
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3. Lnh1 sr
4.
5.
7
9.
10.
11.
�1G = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r
1. U i I S rd3 ��l �o� i °` 7 ��
4.
�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1_ 20% of total cover: —cr-4-
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: W6 up
Dominance Test worksheet:
Multiply by:
Number of Dominant Species
a
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
FAC species
x 3 =
Total Number of Dominant
x4=
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture
p- I I l41�1616 S L
1k I ►v 2s ►Cb ScL
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

12.8 Approved Jurisdictional Determination
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action T.D.: SAW -2016-01335 County: Yadkin, U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -EAST BEND
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Agent: KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, INC., Landmark Center 11
Address: 4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220 Raleigh, North. Carolina 27609
Telephone No.:
Property description:
Size (acres): 36.92 Nearest Town: East Bend
Nearest Waterway: Hall Creek River Basin: Pee Dee
Coordinates: 36.2393, -80.5199 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03 040 101
Location Description: The site is located east of Shady Grove Road and West of Shoals Road near East Bend in Yadkin
County, NC at Coordinates: 36.2393, -80.5199
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters and wetlands on the above described property. We strongly
suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be
considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination -is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ). If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subj cot to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are waters and wetlands on the above described property subject to the -permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the waters and wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property
and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineatiori in a timely manner. For a
more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by
the Corps.
_ The waters and wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no,change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters and wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the -Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on, . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
:notification.

CF: Joe Sullivan, KCI Terchnologies, Inc., 4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
Janice and Steven Baity, 4341 Shady Grove Church Road, East Bend, NC 27018
Jaynes and Karen Smitherman, 3633 Shoals Road, East Bend NC 27018
Bryce and Deanna Smitherman, PO Box 167 Sea Level, NC 28577
Charles and Denise Smitherman, 4508 Shady Grove Church Road, East Bend, NC 27018
Roy Russell Jr, 1670 Jordan Drive, Winston Salern, NC 27105
Santos Pozo, 3046 Shoals Road East Bend, NC 27018
Jose Samuel Pozo, 2064 Aztec Drive, East Bend, NC 27018
Donald Gray Mathis, PO Box 671, East Bend, 27018
Clifford J. Powell, 2920 Davis Road, East Bend, NC 27018
3

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for fiuther instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SW1 TON II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN IVfMAI. PROFFERED PEST
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already, in the administrative record.
P(YDff Off` OONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR UVORMATI GN:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact:
also contact:
William Elliott, Project Manager
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
USAGE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Ave
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
RM 208
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OMI 5
Asheville, NC 28801
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
828-271-7980
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project -site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Atha.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, V.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENTA
A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD)-^ J:,dW k.#Ot V -S- 3 V/ %
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Joe Sullivan, KCI Technoiogies Inc.
4W5 Fails of Neuse Rd. Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
o
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME AND NUMBER: 133S'
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
East of Shady Grove Church Road and West of Shoals Road, Fast Send NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Yadkin
City: East Bend
Center coordinates of site (latAong in degree decimal format):
Lat. w2393 - °N; Long. -80.5199
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Hall creek
°W
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non wetland waters:
12,921 linear feet: s width (ft) and/or 1.78 acres.
Coward'€n ClaSS: Riverine
Stream Flow: Iriterrnlitent/Perennial
Wetlands: p-43 acmes.
Cowardin Class: Forested
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal: ��^------
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested; appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or an behalf of the
applicant/consultant: vicinity Map
QData sheets prepared/submitted by or on behaff of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report,
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS s and 12 digit HUC maps
FU.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K East Bend
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 91 Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 NC Statewide Aeft Photographs or
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

This preliminary JD finds that there "way be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of bignati4and date of
Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
d/ the signature is impracticable)
4

n
O
Ir
m
tn
y
r+
ro
a
r(D
EA
r+
fD
C2
'II
Vi
If
In
In
rD
Ln
n
S
C
R_
rn
n
sv .
c
ro
rn
rD
aq
z
n
u
r+
D)
CL
O
LnLn
3
O
r+
C7
O
ro
r+
rD
0-
rL
C
CD
r+
O
A,
3
7
e -F
m
ro
M
ro
n
rD
_:
Q
r+
0
Z
n
O
3
ro
rL
=,
P2
ro
li
z
tr
m
z
Q
w
M
co
�C
m�
m
v
C
cD
cr
0
N
Q
C"
d
CD
0 G
d
x
CD
.
.��.CL
Cu
CSD
C➢
CSD CCD N CSD
CSD
Py
O
0 Q
O
CD
-,CID
D
OCD
1
rD�r
141
0
n
rD
r*
s�
ray
e�
�dbrobb.ra'-��ab
I
oil �-rj
n
m
�oao
o'oo
a
0
0
0
0
0
o
o O o
boo �
o z
o
e
N
N
C1 CD w
C1
19
C
wwwwwwwww
9)QRN9\m
p,mmCN
L"�
N
-P
Ni,)
�
-P.
N N N N
4�1, w w
N N
W A
C1
�,D O
oo.
0.0OOOOooC,
'v,
oo
ao
ao ao co w o0 0o
O
Gs
N"
cn
iA
N
iA LA i -A LA
N t -j N
tA ih
N N
e+-
f!A
CN
dT
N
01
O1 -A w C:�
CD ao UPi
O
Do
NCD
z
tr
m
z
Q
w
M
co
�C
m�
m
v
C
cD
cr
0
N
Q
C"

12.9 Invasive Species
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

The site will be monitored for the presence of invasive species during both the visual assessments and
vegetation plot monitoring events and will follow the guidance in the Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT 2016) regarding invasive species. A list of non-native
invasive species for North Carolina is found in the NC SAM User Manual Appendix I.
Per the NCIRT 2016 guidance, invasive species management should occur when the functional integrity of
the vegetative community is impacted. One or more invasive species may present a threat to the site, but
the desirable species may have the ability to survive or outcompete despite the competition. Once an
invasive species is identified as impairing the site, physical and/or chemical removal and treatment should
occur. Any control measures will be noted in the annual monitoring reports.
North Carolina Interagency Review Team. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update. Last accessed at: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-
Mitigation-Update.pdf
N.C. Stream Functional Assessment Team. 2016. N.C. Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) User Manual.
(httas://ribits.usace.armv.mil/ribits aaex/f?o=107:150:16800695257725::NO::P150 DOCUMEN
T ID:36298 )
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

12.10 Approved FHWA Categorical Exclusion
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Categorical Exclusion Form for Division of
Mitigation Services Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Version 1.4, 8/18/05
-
Part
Name.,
I
General Project Information
I Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
-County Name:
Yadkin County, NC
DMS Number:
97136
Project Sponsor:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Project Contact Name:
Tim Morris
Project Contact Address:
4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220, Raleigh, NC 27609
Project Contact E-mail:
tim.morris kci.com
EEP Project Mana er:
Matthew Reid
Project Description
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date
DMS Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are
outstanding issues
FinalApproval By:
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question..
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project involve ground -disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
❑ Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
❑ Yes
Program?
❑ No
® N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
® No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
❑ Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
® No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ No
® N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑ No
❑ N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
❑ Yes
Historic Places in the project area?
® No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
® Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
❑ No
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
❑ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 3: Ground -Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question ..
American Indian Reliqious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory' by the Eastern Band of ❑ Yes
Cherokee Indians? ® No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
❑ Yes
Places?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
❑ Yes
of antiquity?
❑ No
® N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
® Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect' the specie and/or "likely to adversely modify"
❑ Yes
Designated Critical Habitat?
❑ No
® N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
❑ Yes
(By virtue of no -response)
❑ No
® N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy' determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
❑ Yes
by the EBCI?
® No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
❑ Yes
project?
❑ No
® N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
❑ Yes
sites?
❑ No
® N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or local
® Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD -1006 been submitted to NRCS?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
® Yes
water body?
❑ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
❑ Yes
outdoor recreation?
® No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manaqement Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
❑ Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
❑ Yes
federal agency?
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

12.11 Agency Correspondence
Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

Draft Mitigation Plan Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
December 7, 2018 DMS Project Number 97136

KCI
Memoranda
ENGINEERS ♦ SURVEYORS ♦ SCIENTISTS ♦ CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LANDMARK CENTER II, SUITE 220 ♦ 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ♦ RALEIGH, NC 27609 ♦ 919-783-9214 ♦ (FAX) 919-783-9266
TO: Matthew Reid, DMS PM
Todd Tugwell, ACOE
FROM: Tim Morris, KCI
DATE: July 25, 2016
SUBJECT: Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Project
IRT Site Review Meeting
KCI Project Number: 201601703
Attendees:
Sue Homewood, NC DWR
Todd Tugwell, ACOE
Paul Weisner, DMS
Matthew Reid, DMS
Tim Morris, KCI
Steve Stokes, KCI
Adam Spiller, KCI
An IRT field review was conducted for the above referenced project on July 19, 2016 starting at
9:00 am. Weather was partly sunny. According to Weather Underground approximately 1.16"
of rainfall had fallen in West Bend in the previous 14 days and 2.50" had fallen since the
beginning of July. All project streams (UTHC and Tributaries 1 -9) were reviewed. Tributary 1
and the upper portion of Tributary 6 were dry. All other streams exhibited flow at the time of the
site visit. Tim Morris and Adam Spiller from KCI presented the project to the attendees. The
following issues and concerns were documented at the meeting and will be addressed in the
future development of the site.
T1A — IRT generally OK with approach. Consider adding easement to cover eroding ephemeral
drains and for BMP development. Must monitor channel carefully to ensure there is no stream
loss associated with bringing the stream bed up. IRT suggested a stream gauge to monitor flow
during monitoring period.
T 1- Dry at the time of site visit. Corps indicated that they probably would not require mitigation
if they were permitting an impact to this stream. Seemed OK with it in the context of the entire

Memorandum
Page 2of3
July 25, 2016
project since this was the only restoration reaches on an intermittent (dry) stream. Suggested a
stream gauge here to monitor flow during monitoring period.
T2 — IRT was OK with R (lower) and E2 (upper) approach. IRT discussed possibly doing more
R in the upper section in the woods but ultimately backed off that thought. KCI would consider
doing more R in the woods if the IRT would grant R credit. The spacing of the trees would allow
KCI to do construction with minimal damage to the existing canopy. Additional feedback on T2
approach is appreciated.
T3 — IRT was OK with approach, including doing wetland rehabilitation within the emergent
seep at the head of the stream. KCI would need to provide a pre -con well if trying to claim
wetland credit via rehabilitation. KCI won't likely have all of this data for inclusion in the
Mitigation Plan (MP) plan, but the IRT said it's fine to keep recording until construction is
started as long as in the MP we explain how it will be used once it's collected (compare to post
construction monitoring). DMS does not know at this point if wetland credits will be
needed/contracted.
T4 — IRT suggested Restoration instead of E2 on this reach (approximately 200'). KCI will
modify approach to R.
T5 — IRT generally agreed with our approach. Similar to any other "light touch"/E2 reaches, we
need to make sure that we quantify the amount of work that's being done on the stream to
illustrate that we're doing enough work for it to be called E2. For TSA, need to clarify that this
isn't just from a leaky well, but is from an actual spring/seep.
T6 — IRT agreed to approach but expressed reservation about E2 on T6 (because it was dry) and
questioned the feasibility of removing the dam. KCI to provide detailed justification of E2 on
upper portion of T6. KCI intends to remove the dam in its entirety, not just notch the dam.
T7 — IRT generally agreed to the R/E2 approach here. The wetland in this area was largely
functional and the IRT indicated that it would not be a candidate for rehabilitation.
T8 — IRT asked KCI to remove E2 from the beginning of TBA. Because of the presence of the
toe -drain, KCI will consider wetland rehab here if DMS is contracting credits. IRT generally OK
with the approach for the rest of T8 and TBA.
T9 — IRT recommended a 5:1 ratio for the E2 section. Restoration section was OK. KCI will
eliminate E2 section as it does not make sense financially (credits do not justify cost).
UTHC — IRT generally OK with all calls until Mathis property although the IRT expressed

Memorandum
Page 3of3
July 25, 2016
concern about the approach from T6 to the Mathis Property. Mathis property is the second
crossing downstream of T61UTHC confluence. Strong justification for R approach will need to
be provided in the MP. IRT requested changing R to E 1 on the Mathis Property, then E2 from
bottom of Mathis Property to the next crossing, then E1 from that crossing to the powerline
crossing, then E2 to the bottom of the project. (see attached mitigation type and extent map) for
final changes.
Assuming agency concurrence with this memo, this approach will result in the deduction of
approximately 675 credits from the initially proposed 11,000 credits.
Meeting adjourned @ approximately 1pm.
Key:
R — Restoration
E 1 — Enhancement 1
E2 — Enhancement 2
UTHC — Unnamed Tributary to Hall Creek

.. 4
1 .� r +' • Project Parcels
1 r • f - Mitigation Type
- Restoration (7,295 If / 7,295 SMCs)
- Enhancement 1 (2,068 If / 1,379 SMCs)
- Enhancement 2 (4,127 If/ 1,651 SMCs)
No Mitigation
Proposed BMP Locations
Proposed Easement (36.9 ac)
Begin T8 !
T6 �.
■. Begin T7
Begin
T5
T6A s: . •. ,
T5
=s' Begin T5B
C G Begin T5A
a �
H Begin T4 n
r
Begin T5
Begin T2
Begin T3
:w
MOM
FIGURE 11. PROPOSED MITIGATION N
0 350 700 TYPE AND EXTENT Source: NC Statewide
Feet MILL DAM CREEK RESTORATION SITE Orthoinnagery, 2014.
YADKIN COUNTY, NC Updated 7126/2016