20181232 Ver 1_Draft Env Management Plan_20180905

DRAFT
Environmental Management Plan

AquAir II Brownfields Property
13300 Sam Neely Road
Charlotte, North Carolina

Brownfields Project No. 18038-14-060

August 17, 2018
H&H Job No. TKC-004

#C-1269 Engineering
#245 Geology

CONTENTS

Completed EMP Template Form

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Plan with Historical Features
Figure 3 Site Plan with Proposed Redevelopment
Figure 4 Site Plan with Sample Locations
Figure 5 Site Plan with Soil and Sediment Sample Locations
Figure 6 Site Plan with Groundwater Sample Locations
Figure 7 Site Plan with Soil Gas Sample Locations

Appendices

Appendix A Preliminary Redevelopment Plan
Appendix B Grading Plans
Appendix C Construction Schedule

1 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in 
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. 

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA).  Its purpose is to clarify 
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an 
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other 
environmental conditions.  The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and 
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant 
decision‐making at the site.  As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, 
including contingency planning for unknowns.  Consult your project manager if you have 
questions. 

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any 
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at 
the Brownfields Property, including demolition.  For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it 
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, 
and approved by the Brownfields project manager.  Failure to comply with the requirements of 
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be 
cause for a reopener   

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the 
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the 
EMP for review.  Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.   

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has 
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, 
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

2 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant 
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:      

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if 
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. 

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for 
each media. 

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. 

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain 
on site after construction grading. 

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). 

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. 

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, 
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media 
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. 

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial 
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for 
brownfields approval. 

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, 
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. 

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields 
Property.  Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. 

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export 
and sampling data from those areas. 

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor 
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional 
Engineer.  The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. 

3 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
GENERAL INFORMATION 

Date: 7/18/2018 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date. 

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: AquAir II Brownfields Property 

Brownfields Project Number: 18038‐14‐060 

Brownfields Property Address: 13300 Sam Neely Road, Charlotte, North Carolina 

Brownfields Property Area (acres): Approximately 75 acres (portion of 154 acres covered by the 
Brownfields Agreement) 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.: Not Applicable 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes, enter Permit No.: Not Applicable 

COMMUNICATIONS 

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers 
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.  Additionally, a copy of the 
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities.  NOTE, THE EMP 
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. 

Prospective Developer (PD): TKC Land Development II, LLC   
Contact Person: R. Alan Lewis  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐319‐8140 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]   

Contractor for PD: Choate Construction   
Contact Person: To be determined 
Phone Numbers:   Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.    

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC    
Contact Person: Mr. Brian McCann 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐526‐2052 Mobile: 346‐804‐9224   
Email: [e-mail]  

Brownfields Program Project Manager:  Ms. Carolyn Minnich 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐661‐0330 Mobile: 704‐661‐0330   
Email: [e-mail]   

4 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  
Not Applicable 

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM   

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept 
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior        ☒ 

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior       ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours   ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in 
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours  ☒ 

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior         ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment 
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days     ☒ 

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): 
☐Residential  ☐Recreational  ☐Institutional  ☐Commercial  ☐Office  ☐Retail  ☒Industrial 
☐Other specify: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities 
at the site: 
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility 
lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if 
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): 
  Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:  

5 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Redevelopment plans include the construction of an approximately 710,000 square‐foot 
industrial building along the central portion of the Site and west of the railroad right of way, as 
well as an approximately 232,000 square‐foot industrial building to the south of the 
aforementioned building.  A Site location map is provided as Figure 1.  Redevelopment plans are 
depicted in Appendix A.  A paved road and parking lots will separate the two buildings, with an 
additional paved parking lot located east and north of the central building.  Prior to construction, 
vegetation will be cleared and the Site will be graded in accordance with the proposed grading 
plans provided in Appendix B.  The proposed finished flooring elevation is 634 feet above mean 
sea level.  Stormwater detention ponds will be constructed to north of the central building and 
east of the southern building to manage surface water flow. 

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: 
   ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown  
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos 
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public 
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.  If available, please 
provide a copy of your demolition permit.  

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? 
  ☒ Yes    ☐ No    ☐ Unknown  
☒  If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.  If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion 
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.  

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement?  Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall 
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 
☐ Residential   ☒ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial 

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Construction start date: To be determined 

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  
A detailed construction schedule is provided in Appendix C 

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes  ☐ No   
  If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:  
Start Date:  To be determined 
    Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
    Planned Activity: 

6 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. 
    Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: To be determined

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property 
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected   
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected 
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected 

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data 
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.  

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate 
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan.  Provide a figure 
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 
Operations at the Site consisted of 1) vanadium catalyst manufacturing from 1965 to 1972, 2) 
solvent recovery, reclamation, and blending from 1974 to 1984, 3) bulk chemical repackaging 
from 1974 to 1976, and 4) laboratory services and chromium compound manufacturing from 
1977 to 1988, and was vacant thereafter. In the early 1990s, soil contamination was identified at 
the Site and subsequently listed as a North Carolina Inactive Hazardous Site (Aquair II 
Corporation Site, NCD074511361). In 1999, stabilization measures were conducted at the Site 
including the removal of vanadium pellets, debris and a septic tank system. The on‐Site buildings 
were demolished in approximately 2000. Soil samples collected from 1990 through 2003 indicate 
metals and chlorinated solvent compounds are the primary constituents of interest in soil.  
Historical and more recent soil and sediment analytical data is provided in Table 1.  A Site Plan 
depicting historical features and soil and sediment sample locations are provided as Figure 2 and 
3, respectively. 

The  Site  was  entered  into  the  North  Carolina  Department  of  Environmental  Quality  (DEQ) 
Brownfields Program in July 2015 and a Brownfield Plat was prepared depicting the “Area of 

7 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Possible Soil Contamination.  In December 2015, Terracon conducted soil sampling in the area 
designated on the Brownfields Plat as the “Area of Possible Soil Contamination.”  A total of 13 
surface soil  samples were collected  to represent  this area.  Additionally, four samples  were 
collected from borings advanced as soil vapor sample points, west of the “Area of Possible Soil 
Contamination.” The sample locations and depths were chosen specifically to evaluate potential 
impacts associated with redevelopment of the site.  Site plans depicting 1) the proposed Site 
redevelopment  2)  the  locations  of  historical  and  more  recent  sample  locations  depicted  by 
consultant and date and 3) the locations of historical and more recent soil and sediment sample 
locations are provided as Figures 3 through 5, respectively. 

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): The results of historical soil samples indicate that several 
VOCs  (carbon  tetrachloride,  chloroform,  tetrachloroethene,  1,1,2,2‐tetrachloroethane,  and 
trichloroethene) were detected above DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) February 2018 
Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) at depths at depths from 1 foot 
below ground surface (ft bgs) to 12 ft bgs.  The 2015 soil samples had low level detections of VOCs 
which were below the February 2018 Industrial/Commercial PSRGs. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs): 
The results of a single historical soil sample analyzed for SVOCs (SS‐03) contained concentrations 
of  SVOCs  above  the  laboratory  reporting  limit  (RL)  but  below  the  February  2018 
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.  The 2015 soil samples did not contain concentrations of SVOCs 
above the RL.  

Metals:   
Cadmium, total chromium, lead, mercury, and vanadium were detected in several historical 
shallow soil samples at concentrations above the February 2018 Industrial/Commercial PSRG and 
regional background levels.  Additionally, chromium or vanadium (or both) were detected in six 
historical sediment samples at concentrations above the February 2018 Industrial/Commercial 
PSRG and regional background levels.  Only vanadium was detected in two 2015 soil samples 
collected from 0 to 0.5 ft bgs at concentrations above the February 2018 Industrial/Commercial 
PSRG and regional background levels.  

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 
In general, historical soil samples were collected from 0‐1 ft bgs.  In 2003, five deeper soil boring 
were installed and several several compounds (carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, 
tetrachloroethene, and trichloroethene) were detected in three soil samples (APH‐42, APH‐58, 
and APH‐59) collected from 6.0‐6.5 ft bgs and 11.5‐12.0 ft bgs.  Soil samples from the 2015 soil 
sampling event were collected from 0‐0.5 ft bgs. 

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 
Approximately 2,903,303 square feet (sq ft). 

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 
The maximum excavation depth will be approximately 6 to 7 ft along the southern portion of the 

8 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
site along cross‐section A‐A’ (See Appendix B). 

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 
Approximately 264,795 cubic yards (cu yds) (See Appendix B). 

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:             
Based on the cut/fill analysis (Appendix B), soil within the “Area of Possible Soil Contamination” 
will not be excavated, but rather is located in an area of the Site primarily designated to receive 
fill material.  

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   
Disposal of impacted soils at off‐Site locations is not anticipated at this time.  The fill analysis in 
the grading plan indicates the Site grading will require an equal amount of fill as soil excavated 
(264,795 cu yds). 

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please 
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are 
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).   

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:  
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous 
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes   ☒No 
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes 
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the 
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes   ☒ No 

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS 
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE 
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND 
REGULATIONS.     
c)  Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes   ☐ No 
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). 
☐ Ignitability  Click or tap here to enter text.               
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. 

9 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. 
☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual 
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory 
TCLP standard)   
The potential for hazardous waste exists because several total chlorinated 
VOCs, total lead, and total mercury concentrations in soil exceeded 20 
times the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) “rule of thumb” 
(Table 1); however, these soil samples were not analyzed by TCLP methods.  
TCLP results for cadmium and chromium were below TCLP characteristic 
levels. 

☐ If no, explain rationale:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE 
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
      ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs  
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  
           ☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) 
    ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for 
determination/explanation.  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Additional comments:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, 
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of 
same.   Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.        
☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager 
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map 
to Brownfields Project Manager once known 
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.  
Provide description of material:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

10 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒  or clean fill ☐  
☒ Describe cap or fill:  
In the unlikely event that impacted soil is excavated and relocated at the Site, the soils 
which are disturbed will be placed within the Area of Possible Soil Contamination and/or 
covered by impervious surfaces such as paved areas or building slabs, creating a cap over 
any potentially impacted soils (Appendix A and Figure 3).  If disturbed soil is placed outside 
of the Area of Possible Soil Contamination, the Brownfields Plat will be revised and re‐
recorded. 

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if 
actions are Post‐Recordation).         
☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. 
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:  

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and 
management of site soils: 
Management of fugitive dust from site 
☒ Yes, describe the method will include: 
The grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, 
and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities.  In the unlikely 
event that contaminated soil is encountered during Site redevelopment that requires 
excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors in daily Site‐safety briefings and 
throughout the day to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and 
atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled water application). 

☐ No, explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Field Screening of site soil 
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting 
field screening:  
During soil disturbance at the site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for 
evidence of the potential significantly impacted soil that may not be suitable to leave in 
place in exposed areas at the site.  Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a 
distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or observance of filled or previously disposed 
materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted 
during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to 
observe the suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the 
material may be impacted, the soil management procedures described below will be 
implemented.  In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields 
project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition. 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

11 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

☐ No, explain rationale:    
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Soil Sample Collection 
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ No, explain rationale:  
Soil samples have been collected from within the Area of Potential Soil Contamination, 
including samples collected specifically to support the Brownfields Agreement.   Based on 
the grading plan, soil within the Area of Possible Soil Contamination is not planned for 
excavation, but rather is located in a fill area, with as much as 6‐7 feet of excavated soil 
placed on top of the impacted soils, followed by the installation of impervious surfaces. 

Management of Unanticipated Impacted Soil 
In the unlikely event significant soil impact is encountered during grading, excavation will 
proceed  only  as  far  as  needed  to allow  grading.    Suspect  significantly‐impacted  soil 
excavated  during  grading  will  be  stockpiled  and  covered  in  a  secure  area  to  allow 
construction to progress.  Suspect impacted soil will be temporarily stockpiled, as depicted 
in DEQ Figure 1, located at the back of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) form.  
At least one representative sample of the stockpiled soil will be collected for analysis of 
total VOCs (discreet sample), total SVOCs, and total Resource Conservation Recovery Act 
(RCRA) 8 metals plus hexavalent chromium and vanadium (composite sample).  If the 
results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity 
characteristic hazardous waste criteria by evaluating the 20 times “rule of thumb,” then 
the soil will also be analyzed for TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity 
characteristic hazardous waste criteria.  Impacted soil will be handled in the manner 
described below based upon the laboratory analyses:  
i. If no organic compounds are detected in the soil sample (other than compounds 
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts), and metals are consistent with 
Site‐specific or regional background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable 
for use as on‐Site fill. 
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are detected in the soil sample which are below 
the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than compounds attributable to sampling 
or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with Site‐specific  or  regional 
background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations (if TCLP  analysis 
needed, based on a 20 times rule of thumb evaluation of the total analytical 
results) are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on‐site as 
fill without conditions. 
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which are above the Industrial PSRGs 
(other than compounds attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which 
are consistent with Site‐specific or regional background levels for metals) and the 
TCLP concentrations (if needed, based on a 20 times rule of thumb evaluation of 
the total analytical results) are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with 

12 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
DEQ’s  written  approval,  may  be  used  on‐site  in  the  “Area  of  Possible  Soil 
Contamination” as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of compacted 
clean soil.  The location of such soil will be provided to DEQ in the final EMP report.  
iv. In the unlikely event that the soil sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP 
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will be transported off‐site to a permitted 
disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste.
Note that areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is 
complete and above the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial Use PSRGs will be managed 
pursuant to this plan and incorporated into the Brownfields Plat.  After the completion of 
excavation, soil which is not below impervious surfaces will be sampled as described later 
in this EMP. 

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium 
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, 
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
Hexavalent chromium via 7196, vanadium via 6020

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted 
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP.  Stockpile methodology should provide erosion 
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, 
and preventing contaminated runoff.  Explain any variances or provide additional details as 
needed: 

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or 
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes 
below (Check all that apply): 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

13 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  
Hexavalent chromium via 7196, vanadium via 6020

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil 
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.  
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs 
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface.  Alternatively, a work plan for 
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. 
Following completion of soil disturbance for any future Site development (i.e., after 
grading and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to 
assess the Site for areas that are not covered with building foundations, sidewalks, or 
asphalt or concrete parking areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas.  Based 
on observations made by the environmental professional, a plan will be prepared for final 
grade sampling and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval. 

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL 
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting 
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written 
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided 
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property 
owner.” 

Requirements for importing fill: 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☐ Yes  ☒ No  ☐ Unknown 

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  
Not applicable. 

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range 

14 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
of depths, please list the range.) 
Not applicable 

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, 
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: 
Not applicable 

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill 
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be 
approved for use at the Brownfields property. 
Not applicable 

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples.  (Check all that apply): 
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan 
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval.  Attach specific location maps for in‐situ 
borrow sites.  If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought 
onto the Brownfields Property. 
Imported fill is not anticipated for the redevelopment of the Site.  In the unlikely event import fill 
is needed for Site grading, a plan for the import source sampling will be developed and submitted 
to the DEQ Brownfields program for review and approval. 

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE 
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS 
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, 
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO 
ENFORCEMENT.  JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN 
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES.  Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for 

15 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
additional details.  

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the 
proposed export actions.  Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will 
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of 
export and sampling results included. 
Exporting soil from the Site is not anticipated for the redevelopment of the Site. 

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?  
☐ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by 
landfill) 
☐ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be 
determined by the accepting Landfill;  
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility  
☐ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a 
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or 
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase 
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields 
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of 
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields.  Please provide additional details below.  
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill off‐site at a non‐Brownfields Property ‐ Please provide 
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material.  This will 
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section.  Additional information is 
provided in IR 15.  Please provide additional details below.  

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide 
details related to the proposed plans). 
Exporting soil from the Site is not anticipated for the redevelopment of the Site. 

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 

☒ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☐ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they 
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original 
depth from which it was excavated. 

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, 
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? 
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

16 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

☐ If no, include rationale here: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:  
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in the utility 
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety 
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers (ex. worker breathing zone will be 
monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector).  If results indicate further action is warranted 
in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial 
fans) will be implemented. 

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below. 

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 
The depth to groundwater in the southern portion of the property (MW‐5 and MW‐7) is 
approximately 11 to 13 ft bgs, 9 to 13 feet in the eastern portion of the site (MW‐9), and 
approximately 4 to 5 ft bgs in the northern portion of the site (AMW‐106 and AMW‐410) (See 
Figure 6 for monitoring well locations). 

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite  ☐offsite   ☐both or ☐unknown 
sources?  Describe source(s):  
Groundwater sampling has been performed at the site beginning in the early 1990s as part of 
previous investigations. The source of the groundwater contamination is historical activities at 
the Site.  Former remediation efforts included the operation of a pump and treat groundwater 
recovery system and a network of air sparge wells.  On‐Site groundwater is impacted by VOCs 
and metals at concentrations exceeding the April 2013 North Carolina Administrative Code 
(NCAC) 02L.0202 Groundwater Quality Standard (2L Standard) and/or the February 2018 DEQ 
Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non‐Residential Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSL).  
VOCs detected above 2L Standards in on‐Site groundwater include carbon tetrachloride, 
chloroform, 1,1‐dichloroethane, 1,2‐dichloroethane, 1,1‐dichloroethene, cis‐1,2‐dichloroethene, 
methylene chloride, 1,1,1,2‐tetrachloroethane, tetrachloroethene (PCE), 1,1,1‐trichloroethane, 
1,1,2‐trichloroethane, and trichloroethene (TCE). Metals detected above 2L Standards in on‐Site 
groundwater include chromium and manganese.  VOCs detected above the Non‐Residential 
GWSL include carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, 1,1‐dichloroethene, PCE, 1,1,2‐trichloroethane, 
and TCE.  Groundwater analytical data and sampling locations are provided in Table 2 and Figure 
6, respectively. 

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  
Groundwater flow is generally to the east towards an unnamed stream (Figure 3) located east of 
the railroad tracks. 

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?    
☒Yes    ☐No  
If yes, describe these activities: 

17 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Based on the cut/fill exhibit (Appendix B), the southern cut area will extend to an approximate 
depth of 6 to 7 feet bgs; however, groundwater elevations in this area are approximately 11 to 
13 ft bgs.  Consequently, groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during 
redevelopment.  The cut/fill exhibit also depicts a cut area north of the proposed building in the 
area of a planned stormwater retention pond and parking lot area.  In these areas, groundwater 
may be encountered at depths of 4 to 5 ft bgs; however, based on groundwater analytical data in 
the vicinity (AMW‐106 and AMW‐410), groundwater impacts are not expected.  Should 
groundwater be exposed/encountered during redevelopment of the Brownfields property, the 
PD or the PD’s contractor will contact the project environmental engineer and where 
appropriate, steps will be taken as noted below.  The environmental engineer will update the 
DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days. 

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered 
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent 
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or 
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or 
sampling procedures).  
Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if 
groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during 
construction activities.  The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate; tested and 
disposed off‐site (if impacted); or tested and discharged to the ground outside of the grading 
area if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards (in accordance with applicable 
municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control). 

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes   ☐No    
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other 
agencies?..................................................................................................................☒Yes   ☐No  

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously 
unidentified wells.   
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations.  It 
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as 
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring 
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.   
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked 
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance  
☐ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further 
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for 
abandonment is given. 

7) Please provide additional details as needed:   
Four monitoring wells remain at the Site to the east of the railroad tracks.  These four monitoring 
wells are monitored annually as a requirement of the Brownfields Agreement and will not be 
impacted by the Site redevelopment.  DEQ Brownfields approved the abandonment of all of the 
monitoring and remediation wells located to the west of the railroad in preparation for the Site 

18 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not 
permissible.  If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD 
be responsible for replacement of the well.   

PART 3. SURFACE WATER ‐Please fill out the information below. 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☐ Yes ☒ No 
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities?    ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
If surface water run‐off gathers in an open excavation determined during construction to be 
impacted, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken.  The accumulated water will 
be allowed to evaporate; tested and disposed off‐site (if impacted); or tested and discharged to 
the ground outside of the grading area if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards (in 
accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction 
stormwater control). 

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☒ Yes  ☐ No 

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☒ Yes  ☐ No 

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
A total of 11 sediment samples have historically been collected at the Site, 6 of which (SED‐1 
(1993), SED‐2 (1993), SED‐3 (1993), SED‐4 (1993), SED‐4 (1997), and SED‐5 (1997) contained 
concentrations of total chromium or vanadium (or both) above the Industrial/Commercial PSRG 
redevelopment.  These monitoring and remediation wells were abandoned in May and June 2018 
(Figure 3).  

19 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
and the Site‐specific or regional background screening levels.  These sediment samples are not 
associated with a surface water body or stream, but rather a former drain line effluent run‐off 
area and associated former intermittent drainage swale.  These locations are within a fill area of 
the grading plan, and as such, no disturbance of the sediment in this area is anticipated.  
Sediment analytical data and sampling locations are provided in Table 1 and Figure 5, respectively  

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site 
screening levels.  
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?  

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? 
  ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities 
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management 
of such contact:  
In the unlikely event potentially impacted soil vapors are encountered during future 
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the 
 In October 2011, Hart & Hickman, PC performed a soil gas investigation at the Site within the Limits 
of Groundwater Contamination, as depicted on the Brownfields Plat, and within and around the 
footprint of the proposed building.  Seven soil gas samples were collected at approximately 6 ft bgs.  
Several VOCs (carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, chloroform, 1,2‐dichlorobenzene, 1,2‐
dichloroethane, 1,1‐dichloroethene, ethylbenzene, hexachlorobutadiene, 1,1,2,2‐trichloroethane, 
tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1‐trichloroethane, 1,1,2‐trichloroethane, trichloroethene, and m,p‐Xylene) 
were detected in at least one sample at concentrations exceeding the DEQ IHSB Non‐Residential Soil 
Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).  

In December 2015, Terracon collected four soil gas samples west of the Limits of Groundwater 
Contamination at the Site and within the footprint of the proposed building from depths of 3 to 5 ft 
bgs.  VOCs were not detected above Non‐Residential SGSLs.   Soil gas analytical data and sampling 
locations are provided in Table 3 and Figure 7, respectively   

20 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
vapors will be performed (ex. worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated 
photoionization detector).  If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate 
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or 
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment. 
1) Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map 
showing the location of these exceedances. 
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0‐6 inches ☐Other, please 
describe:   
Not Applicable 

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment 
activities? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact 
In the unlikely event potentially impacted soil vapors are encountered during future 
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the 
vapors will be performed (ex. worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated 
photoionization detector).  If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate 
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below. 

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will 
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated 
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact: 
In the unlikely event potentially impacted indoor air is encountered prior to the activation of a 
planned sub‐slab depressurization system during future redevelopment activities, the area will be 
evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed (ex. worker breathing 
zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector).  If results indicate further action 
is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

21 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below. 
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately   
If submitted separately provide date:  
To be determined as tenant has not been selected and architectural plans are not finalized. 

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer 

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials 

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown 
potential new sources of contamination.   During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon 
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.  
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of 
contamination are discovered.  These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this 
EMP.   

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site 
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be 
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors.  Samples will generally be 
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.   

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and 
silver) 
6020/7471 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

22 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) 
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should 
be conducted, even if not listed here.  
Hexavalent chromium via 7196, vanadium via 6020  

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly 
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. 
If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow development to proceed, the 
contractor will inspect the pipe for fluids, collect the fluids where appropriate, and inspect the area 
for signs of a release using field methods.  The collected fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and 
RCRA 8 metals to determine appropriate disposition of the fluid. 

Underground Storage Tanks:  
In the event that impacts associated with an underground storage tank (UST) release are found to 
be present on the subject site, they will be addressed through the Brownfields Program. 

Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit: 
If a sub‐grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or 
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation.  If the 
pit contains waste, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste 
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, TCLP RCRA 8 metals and disposed off‐site at a 
permitted facility, or the waste will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A Managing On‐Site Soil 
section outlined above in the EMP above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste 
present.  If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete 
may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed 
by methods specified by the off‐Site disposal facility. 

Buried Waste Material: 
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to 
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant.  The environmental consultant 
will review the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling will 
be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after 
the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed.  The confirmation samples will be analyzed for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium and vanadium.  Areas of suspected 
contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the 
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan and incorporated into the 
Brownfields Plat. 

Re‐Use of Impacted Soils On‐Site: 
The procedures for the re‐use of impacted soils is presented above in Part 1.A.4 Managing On‐Site 

23 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
Soil section outlined above in the EMP above. 

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on‐site, management on‐site can be considered after the 
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields 
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on‐site.  

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as 
needed below: 
In the event that soil within an excavation cannot be dried adequately for construction purposes 
using the methods described above, the soil may be amended with clean soil, aggregate, drying 
agents, and/or stabilizing agents to achieve the desired geotechnical qualities or placed beneath 
impervious surface cover.  Amendment may be conducted inside or outside the excavation and the 
material replaced into the excavation.  If an amendment is used, the type of amendment will be 
provided to DEQ for approval prior to its use.  DEQ will be notified prior to movement of the soil to 
other areas at the Site if results of laboratory analysis for soil samples collected from the excavation 
indicate that compound concentrations are detected above Industrial/Commercial Use PSRGs 
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with 
Site‐specific background levels for metals). 

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING 

☒  Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the 
project.  If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be 
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of 
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager).  These reports will be required for as long as 
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final 
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of 
redevelopment.  Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary 
Report is anticipated to be submitted on To be determined  

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last 
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:  
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;   
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;  
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of 
environmental media;  
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and 
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed 
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and  
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, 

24 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required 
manifests shall be included). 

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment 
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. 

25 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   
APPROVAL SIGNATURES 

Brownfields Project Number: 18038‐14‐060    

Brownfields Project Name: AquAir II Brownfields Site     

Prospective Developer: TKC Land Development II, LLC  Date Click or tap to enter a date. 
Printed Name/Title/Company:  R. Alan Lewis, Principal, TKC 
Land Development II, LLC  

Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC  Date Click or tap to enter a date. 
Printed Name/Title/Company: Brian McCann, PG, Project 
Manager, Hart & Hickman, PC 

Brownfields Project Manager:Carolyn Minnich  Date Click or tap to enter a date. 

26 
EMP Version 2, June 2018   

Table 1 (Page 1 of 5)Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled ByGreenhorne & O'Mara Sample IDSS-03 BAC-1 BAC-2 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-6 SED-1 SED-2 SED-3 SED-4TypeSoil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Depth (ft bgs)NR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Sample Date10/25/1990 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992 9/10/1992Range Range Mean Ref. Unitsmg/LVOCs (8260)AcetoneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS12,000 140,000---- -- ----BenzeneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS1.2 5.4---- -- ----2-Butanone (MEK)NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS5,500 40,000---- -- ----Carbon DisulfideNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS160 740---- -- ----Carbon Tetrachloride29<0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0055 <0.0143.40.026<0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.0260.69 3 ---- -- ----Chlorobenzene10NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS58 280 ---- -- ----ChloroformBQL <0.0065 <0.00650.067<0.0055 <0.014 <0.280.025<0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.0260.34 1.5 ---- -- ----2-ChlorotolueneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS310 4,700 ---- -- ----1,2-DichlorobenzeneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS380 2,000 ---- -- ----1,1-DichloroethaneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS3.8 17 ---- -- ----1,2-DichloroethaneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS0.49 2.2 ---- -- ----1,1-DichloroetheneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS48 210 ---- -- ----cis-1,2-DichloroetheneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS31 470 ---- -- ----trans-1,2-DichloroetheneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS310 4,700 ---- -- ----Diisopropyl EtherNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS480 2,000 ---- -- ----EthylbenzeneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS6.1 27 ---- -- ----HexachlorobutadieneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS1.3 5.6 ---- -- ----4-Methyl-2-pentanoneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS7,000 30,000 ---- -- ----Methylene ChlorideNS0.029 B 0.021 B 0.022 B 0.022 B<0.014 <0.280.021 B<0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.02658 650 ---- -- ----Tetrachloroethene150<0.0065 <0.00650.019<0.0055 <0.0141.3 0.18<0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.02617 82 ---- -- ----1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS2.1 9.3 ---- -- ----1,1,2,2,-TetrachloroethaneNS <0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0065 <0.00550.26<0.28 <0.0065 <0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.0260.64 2.8 ---- -- ----TolueneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS990 9,700 ---- -- ----1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS13 190 ---- -- ----1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS12 55 ---- -- ----1,1,1-Trichloroethane36<0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0055 <0.014 <0.280.007<0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.0261,700 7,600 ---- -- ----1,1,2-TrichloroethaneNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS0.32 1.3 ---- -- ----Trichloroethene9.5<0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0065 <0.0055 <0.0141.2<0.0065 <0.32 <0.34 <0.010 <0.0260.87 4 ---- -- ----XylenesNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS120 530 ---- -- ----SVOCs (8270)Benzoic Acid0.36 J/UDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA51,000 660,000 ---- -- ----Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate4.5 / 2.3 JDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA39 160 ---- -- ----Butylbenzylphthalate0.3 J/UDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA290 1,200 ---- -- ----1,4-Dichlorobenzene1.1 UDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.8 12 ---- -- ----Di-n-butylphthalate0.29 J/UD NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1,300 16,000 ---- -- ----Hexachlorobutadiene0.25 J/UDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- ----Hexachloroethane0.2 J/UDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.9 8.5 ---- -- ----Phenol2.3 / 1.4 JDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,800 49,000 ---- -- ----1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene46 / 59DNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA13 190 ---- -- ----RCRA Metals (6010/7470)ArsenicNA1<1.01.9 1.7 1.4 1.6<1.01.4 1.4 1.9<1.00.68 3 <1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 A--Barium72.4 84 31 54 60 49 190 50 95 91 55 63 3,100 47,000 31 - 86.5 50 - 1,000 356 A--Cadmium788<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.3 1.8<1.038 22 5.8 4.8 14 200 <1 - 9 1.0 - 10 4.3 B--Chromium (total)18,50022 10 30 507495 110810 1,5002003000.31 6.5 10 - 24.4 7.0 - 300 65 A--Copper116NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA630 9,300 NE 3.0 - 100 34 A--Lead2,820541444242 7.9 66 79 61 59 400 800 4 - 20.5 BRL - 50 16 A--Mercury11.1NA NA <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.250.91 0.46<0.25 <0.252.3 9.7 BRL - <0.25 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 A--NickelBQLNANANANANANANANANANANA310 4,700 NE BRL - 150 23 A--SeleniumNA <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.078 1,200 NE <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 A--SilverBQL <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.09.8 3.0<2.0 <2.078 1,200 NE BRL - 5.0 NE C--Vanadium106 130 74140 360 2,200 370 1,150 700 340 510290 78 120 NE 15 - 300 107 A--Zinc109NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4,700 70,000 NE 25 - 124 56 A--TCLP Metals (6010) mg/LCadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Ref.A. North Carolina soilsB. Southeastern USA soilsC. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey. Open-File Report 2005-1253, Table 3. 2005.3) EPA Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) hazardous waste threshold level, 2004Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold and highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial use PSRGs (and above regional background concentrations for metals).Bold, highlighted, and underlined values indicate total concentration exceeds 20 times the TCLP regulatory levelVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not Applicable; NR = Not ReportedBQL = Below Laboratory Quantitation Limits; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; mg/L = milligrams per literJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; D = Constituent was analyzed using a second dilution.U = Constituent was not detected using a second dilution; B = Constituent was also detected in the control blank.Sources:S&ME, Soil Assessment Report - Aquair Site, October 2003.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.mg/kgDelta Environmental ConsultantsScreening CriteriaRegional Background Metals In Soil2TCLP Regulatory Threshold3Unrestricted Use PSRGs1 Industrial/ CommercialPSRGs1Site-Specific Background Metals in SoilS:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 1 (Page 1 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 2 of 5)Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled By Sample IDType Depth (ft bgs) Sample Date UnitsVOCs (8260)AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform2-Chlorotoluene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-DichloroetheneDiisopropyl EtherEthylbenzeneHexachlorobutadiene4-Methyl-2-pentanoneMethylene ChlorideTetrachloroethene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2,-TetrachloroethaneToluene1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneXylenesSVOCs (8270)Benzoic AcidBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalate1,4-DichlorobenzeneDi-n-butylphthalateHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethanePhenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneRCRA Metals (6010/7470)ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromium (total)CopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverVanadiumZincTCLP Metals (6010) mg/LCadmiumChromiumSS-4 SS-5 SS-6 SS-7 SS-8 SUMP-1 SUMP-2 SED-1 SED-2 SED-3 SED-5 SED-6 SED-7Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.57/11/1996 7/11/1996 7/11/1996 7/11/1996 7/29/1996 7/11/1996 7/12/19961997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997Range Range Mean Ref.mg/L0.220 0.900 J<15530 0.130 J<0.0063 <0.062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA12,000 140,000---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <5.5 <39.3750.071<0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.2 5.4---- -- ----<0.060 <1.462 <31 <78.7500.210<0.0126 <0.0124NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA5,500 40,000---- -- ----0.0077 J<0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.013<0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA160 740---- -- ----<0.030 <0.7313.2 J<39.3753.5 D<0.0063 <0.0063NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.69 3 ---- -- ----0.037 0.600 J 120 8.6 J 0.140<0.0063 <0.0064NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA58 280 ---- -- ----0.170 0.8003.7 J<39.3751.1 DJ<0.0063 <0.0065NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.34 1.5 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.0081 J<0.0063 <0.0066NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA310 4,700 ---- -- ----0.018 J 3.6<15.5 <39.3750.720 DJ<0.0063 <0.0067NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA380 2,000 ---- -- ----0.024 J<0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.150<0.0063 <0.0068NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA3.8 17 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.49 2.2 ---- -- ----0.056<0.731 <15.5 <39.3751.6 J<0.0063 <0.0069NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA48 210 ---- -- ----0.640<0.731 <15.5 <39.3751.2<0.0063 <0.0061NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA31 470 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.089<0.0063 <0.00611NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA310 4,700 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA480 2,000 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.0067 J<0.0063 <0.00612NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA6.1 27 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.079<0.0063 <0.00613NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- ----0.074<0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.530<0.0063 <0.00614NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA7,000 30,000 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3751.1<0.0063 <0.00615NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA58 650 ---- -- ----2.3 D 1949074082 D<0.0063 <0.00618NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA17 82 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.3750.016 J 0.029<0.00616NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.1 9.3 ---- -- ----<0.03011 120<39.3750.650 0.05<0.00617NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.64 2.8 ---- -- ----0.030<0.7316.1 J<39.3750.084<0.0063 <0.00619NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA990 9,700 ---- -- ----0.015 J<0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA13 190 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA12 55 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1,700 7,600 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.32 1.3 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.87 4 ---- -- ----<0.030 <0.731 <15.5 <39.375 <0.034 <0.0063 <0.0062NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA120 530 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA51,000 660,000 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA39 160 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA290 1,200 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.8 12 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1,300 16,000 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.9 8.5 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,800 49,000 ---- -- ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA13 190 ---- -- ----3.82 4.61 4.59 3.42NA2.14 2.67NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.68 3 <1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 A--66.1 72 78.1 60.0NA46.6 62.8 570 230 84 49 66 160 100 150 3,100 47,000 31 - 86.5 50 - 1,000 356 A--11.6 J<0.582.95 38.3NA <0.64 <0.592.1 5.4 1.2 8 11 170 2.4 1.6 14 200 <1 - 9 1.0 - 10 4.3 B--1,220 J87.1 65.21,310NA11.8 236 40 73 30 110 1601,40063 29 0.31 6.5 10 - 24.4 7.0 - 300 65 A--NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA630 9,300 NE 3.0 - 100 34 A--22.7 22.3 18.3 27.7NA6.56 14.9 25 30 24 97 110 440 40 31 400 800 4 - 20.5 BRL - 50 16 A--<0.12 <0.120.31 0.7NA <0.13 <0.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.3 9.7 BRL - <0.25 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 A--NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA310 4,700 NE BRL - 150 23 A--NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 A--<1.21 <1.16 <1.27 <1.29 NA <1.28 <1.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE BRL - 5.0 NE D--NA NA NA NA NA NA NA110 330 824306801,000130 90 78 120 NE 15 - 300 107 A--NA NA NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4,700 70,000 NE 25 - 124 56 A--NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Ref.A. North Carolina soilsB. Southeastern USA soilsC. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey. Open-File Report 2005-1253, Table 3. 2005.3) EPA Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure hazardous waste threshold level, 2004Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold and highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial use PSRGs (and above regional background concentrations for metals).Bold, highlighted, and underlined values indicate total concentration exceeds 20 times the TCLP regulatory levelVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not Applicable; NR = Not ReportedBQL = Below Laboratory Quantitation Limits; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; mg/L = milligrams per literJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; D = Constituent was analyzed using a second dilution.U = Constituent was not detected using a second dilution; B = Constituent was also detected in the control blank.Sources:S&ME, Soil Assessment Report - Aquair Site, October 2003.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.Screening CriteriaUnrestricted Use PSRGs1 Industrial/ CommercialPSRGs1Site-Specific Background Metals in SoilGeraghty & MillerRegional Background Metals In Soil2TCLP Regulatory Threshold319970.5SedimentSED-4/DUPS&MEmg/kgS:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 1 (Page 2 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 3 of 5)Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled By Sample IDType Depth (ft bgs) Sample Date UnitsVOCs (8260)AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform2-Chlorotoluene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-DichloroetheneDiisopropyl EtherEthylbenzeneHexachlorobutadiene4-Methyl-2-pentanoneMethylene ChlorideTetrachloroethene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2,-TetrachloroethaneToluene1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneXylenesSVOCs (8270)Benzoic AcidBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalate1,4-DichlorobenzeneDi-n-butylphthalateHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethanePhenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneRCRA Metals (6010/7470)ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromium (total)CopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverVanadiumZincTCLP Metals (6010) mg/LCadmiumChromiumAAH-1 AAH-9 AAH-14 AAH-17 AAH-25AAH-31 AAH-33 AAH-34 AAH-38 AAH-47 AAH-49 AAH-51 APH-20Soil Soil Soil Soil SoilSoil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.50.0-0.5 0.0-00.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0-0.5 2.0-2.57/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/2/20037/2/2003 7/1/2013 7/1/2003 7/2/20037/2/2003 7/1/2003 7/2/2003 7/31/2003Range Range Mean Ref.mg/LNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA<0.005612,000 140,000---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.00561.2 5.4---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA<0.00565,500 40,000---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA<0.0056160 740---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA1.4NA63NA NA NA NA0.940.69 3.0 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.043NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.005658 280 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.51NA0.260NA NA NA NA0.25 1.5 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.0088NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.0056310 4,700 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.0056380 2,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.16NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.00563.8 17 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.00560.49 2.2 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.28NA0.017NA NA NA NA0.3948 210 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.82NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA0.1131 470 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA0.029310 4,700 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.0056480 2,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.00566.1 27 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANANANANA NA NA NA<0.00561.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANANANANA NA NA NA<0.00567,000 30,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.43NA0.015NA NA NA NA 0.005758 650 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA9.9NA4.1NA NA NA NA<0.005617 82 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.00562.1 9.3 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA0.640.64 2.8 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.044NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.0056990 9,700 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.005613 190 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.005612 55 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.99NA0.086NA NA NA NA<0.00561,700 7,600 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA0.013NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA0.0190.32 1.3 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA11NA0.080NA NA NA NA5.50.87 4.0 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA <0.0054 NA <0.0057 NA NA NA NA<0.0056120 530 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA51,000 660,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA39 160 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA290 1,200 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.8 12 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1,300 16,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.9 8.5 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,800 49,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA13 190 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA1.1NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.68 3.0 <1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,100 47,000 31 - 86.5 50 - 1,000 356 A --NA NA0.59 0.49 0.66<0.110.22 0.46 0.75 0.58 0.75 34NA14 200 <1 - 9 1.0 - 10 4.3 B --110 110 71 340 44018 822.13 44 2,300 56 73 190NA0.31 6.5 10 - 24.4 7.0 - 300 65 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA630 9,300 NE 3.0 - 100 34 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA50NA400 800 4 - 20.5 BRL - 50 16 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.3 9.7 BRL - <0.25 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA310 4,700 NE BRL - 150 23 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE BRL - 5.0 NE C --660 450 48089 8615091 1001,000 830 470 570NA78 120 NE 15 - 300 107 A --NA NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4,700 70,000 NE 25 - 124 56 A --NA NA NA0.78NA NA NA NA0.12NA NA0.19NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0NA NA NA0.31NA NA2.3NA0.07NA NANANA-- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Ref.A. North Carolina soilsB. Southeastern USA soilsC. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey. Open-File Report 2005-1253, Table 3. 2005.3) EPA Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure hazardous waste threshold level, 2004Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold and highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial use PSRGs (and above regional background concentrations for metals).Bold, highlighted, and underlined values indicate total concentration exceeds 20 times the TCLP regulatory levelVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not Applicable; NR = Not ReportedBQL = Below Laboratory Quantitation Limits; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; mg/L = milligrams per literJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; D = Constituent was analyzed using a second dilution.U = Constituent was not detected using a second dilution; B = Constituent was also detected in the control blank.Sources:S&ME, Soil Assessment Report - Aquair Site, October 2003.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.Regional Background Metals In Soil2TCLP Regulatory Threshold3Unrestricted Use PSRGs1Industrial/ CommercialPSRGs1Site-Specific Background Metals in SoilScreening CriteriaS&MES:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 1 (Page 3 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 4 of 5)Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled By Sample IDType Depth (ft bgs) Sample Date UnitsVOCs (8260)AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform2-Chlorotoluene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-DichloroetheneDiisopropyl EtherEthylbenzeneHexachlorobutadiene4-Methyl-2-pentanoneMethylene ChlorideTetrachloroethene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2,-TetrachloroethaneToluene1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneXylenesSVOCs (8270)Benzoic AcidBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalate1,4-DichlorobenzeneDi-n-butylphthalateHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethanePhenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneRCRA Metals (6010/7470)ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromium (total)CopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverVanadiumZincTCLP Metals (6010) mg/LCadmiumChromiumAPH-38 APH-58 APH-59Soil Soil Soil Soil 6.0-6.5 Soil Soil Soil Soil6.0-6.5 11.5-12.0 6.0-6.5 11.5-12.0 7/2/2003 6.0-6.5 11.5-12.0 11.5-12.0 6.0-6.57/31/2003 7/31/2003 7/31/2003 7/31/2003 7/30/2003 7/30/2003 7/31/20037/31/2003Range Range Mean Ref.mg/LNA NA NA NA <0.27 NA NA NA NA12,000 140,000---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.81.2 5.4---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA <0.27 NA NA NA NA5,500 40,000---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA <0.27 NA NA NA NA160 740---- -- -- --0.51 0.95 6.3 0.8915610361.51200.69 3.0 ---- -- -- --0.013 0.04 0.18 0.0481.4<12 <1.20.82 88 58 280 ---- -- -- --0.96 0.94 4.9 0.941117 1.7 2.3<4.80.34 1.5 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.00470.011<0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.8310 4,700 ---- -- -- --0.081 0.48<0.0048 <0.00441.5<12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.8380 2,000 ---- -- -- --0.0065<0.00470.24 0.0720.96<12 <1.20.031<4.83.8 17 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.00474.8 0.057<0.27 <12 <1.20.13<4.80.49 2.2 ---- -- -- --0.015 0.01 0.22 0.0370.36<12 <1.20.061 4.8 48 210 ---- -- -- --0.16 0.12 0.15 0.03<0.27 <12 <1.20.02<4.831 470 ---- -- -- --<0.00540.0059<0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.8310 4,700 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.20.035<4.8480 2,000 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.86.1 27 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA<0.27NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA<0.27NA NA NA NA7,000 30,000 ---- -- -- --0.57 0.32 0.8 69<12 <1.23 8 58 650 ---- -- -- --0.74 4.3 0.82 0.32<0.2752031.62,70017 82 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.82.1 9.3 ---- -- -- --0.016 0.017 0.087<0.00440.35<12 <1.20.19<4.80.64 2.8 ---- -- -- --0.011 0.0093 0.590.015 3.1<12 <1.20.079 8.5 990 9,700 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.813 190 ---- -- -- --0.0054<0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0044 <0.27 <12 <1.2 <0.0048 <4.812 55 ---- -- -- --0.041 0.052 0.24 0.363.6160 1.8 0.17 240 1,700 7,600 ---- -- -- --0.017 0.017 0.049 0.016<0.27 <12 <1.20.019<4.80.32 1.3 ---- -- -- --0.21 0.45 2.8 0.185.31601.8 14800.87 4.0 ---- -- -- --<0.0054 <0.00470.0110.005 0.11<12 <1.2 <0.004810 120 530 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA51,000 660,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA39 160 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA290 1,200 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.8 12 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1,300 16,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.9 8.5 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,800 49,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA13 190 ---- -- -- --<0.52NANANANANANANANA0.68 3.0 <1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA3,100 47,000 31 - 86.5 50 - 1,000 356 A --1.2NA3.4NA NA1.6NA NA NA14 200 <1 - 9 1.0 - 10 4.3 B --54NA5.1NA NA16NA NA NA0.31 6.5 10 - 24.4 7.0 - 300 65 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA630 9,300 NE 3.0 - 100 34 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA400 800 4 - 20.5 BRL - 50 16 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.3 9.7 BRL - <0.25 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA310 4,700 NE BRL - 150 23 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA78 1,200 NE BRL - 5.0 NE C --41NA160NA NA85NA NA NA78 120 NE 15 - 300 107 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4,700 70,000 NE 25 - 124 56 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Ref.A. North Carolina soilsB. Southeastern USA soilsC. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey. Open-File Report 2005-1253, Table 3. 2005.3) EPA Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure hazardous waste threshold level, 2004Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold and highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial use PSRGs (and above regional background concentrations for metals).Bold, highlighted, and underlined values indicate total concentration exceeds 20 times the TCLP regulatory levelVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not Applicable; NR = Not ReportedBQL = Below Laboratory Quantitation Limits; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; mg/L = milligrams per literJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; D = Constituent was analyzed using a second dilution.U = Constituent was not detected using a second dilution; B = Constituent was also detected in the control blank.Sources:S&ME, Soil Assessment Report - Aquair Site, October 2003.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.Regional Background Metals In Soil2TCLP Regulatory Threshold3APH-24 APH-32S&MEmg/kgScreening CriteriaAPH-42Unrestricted Use PSRGs1Industrial/ CommercialPSRGs1Site-Specific Background Metals in SoilS:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 1 (Page 4 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 5 of 5)Summary of Soil and Sediment Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled By Sample IDType Depth (ft bgs) Sample Date UnitsVOCs (8260)AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform2-Chlorotoluene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethenecis-1,2-Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-DichloroetheneDiisopropyl EtherEthylbenzeneHexachlorobutadiene4-Methyl-2-pentanoneMethylene ChlorideTetrachloroethene1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2,2,-TetrachloroethaneToluene1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneXylenesSVOCs (8270)Benzoic AcidBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButylbenzylphthalate1,4-DichlorobenzeneDi-n-butylphthalateHexachlorobutadieneHexachloroethanePhenol1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneRCRA Metals (6010/7470)ArsenicBariumCadmiumChromium (total)CopperLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilverVanadiumZincTCLP Metals (6010) mg/LCadmiumChromiumSB-01 SB-02 SB-03 SB-04 SB-05 SB-06 SB-07 SB-08 SB-09 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-13 SB-14 SB-15 SB-16 SB-17Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil SoilSoil0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.5 0-0.512/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/201512/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/201512/8/2015 12/8/2015 12/8/2015Range Range Mean Ref.mg/L<0.0875 <0.0908 <0.0914 <0.0866<0.108 <0.109 <0.112 <0.0863<0.109 <0.101 <0.173 <0.1900.205<0.116 <0.186 <0.183 <0.11712,000 140,000---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00591.2 5.4---- -- -- --<0.0875 <0.0908 <0.0914 <0.0866<0.108 <0.109 <0.112 <0.0863 <0.109 <0.101 <0.173 <0.190 <0.0157 <0.116 <0.186 <0.183 <0.1175,500 40,000---- -- -- --NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA160 740---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.69 3.0 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005958 280 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.34 1.5 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059310 4,700 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059380 2,000 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00593.8 17 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.49 2.2 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005948 210 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005931 470 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059310 4,700 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059480 2,000 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00596.1 27 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NANA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --<0.0437 <0.0454 <0.0457 <0.0433<0.0539 <0.0547 <0.0056 <0.0432 <0.0543 <0.0503 <0.0866 <0.0951 <0.0785<0.0582 <0.0930 <0.0916 <0.05867,000 30,000 ---- -- -- --<0.0175 <0.0182 <0.01830.101<0.0215 <0.0219 <0.0224 <0.0173<0.0217 <0.0201 <0.0347 <0.03800.0344 0.0334 0.0403<0.0367 <0.023458 650 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054<0.005 <0.00870.0107<0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005917 82 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00592.1 9.3 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.64 2.8 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059990 9,700 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005913 190 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.005912 55 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00591,700 7,600 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.32 1.3 ---- -- -- --<0.0044 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.00590.87 4.0 ---- -- -- --<0.0087 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0043<0.0054 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0043 <0.0054 <0.005 <0.0087 <0.0095 <0.0079 <0.0058 <0.0093 <0.0092 <0.0059120 530 ---- -- -- --<2.020 <2.040 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.44751,000 660,000 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.44739 160 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.447290 1,200 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.4472.8 12 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.4471,300 16,000 ---- -- -- --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.3 5.6 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.4471.9 8.5 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.4473,800 49,000 ---- -- -- --<0.405 <0.408 <0.421 <0.398 <0.462 <0.404 <0.455 <0.409 <0.445 <0.432 <0.397 <0.413 <0.413 <0.351 <0.455 <0.422 <0.44713 190 ---- -- -- --<1.11.3 1.1<0.960 <1.1 <1.0 <1.00.9<0.940 <3.71.1<0.89 <0.81 <3.0 <0.714.1<0.740.68 3.0 <1.0 - 1.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 A --102 76.6 88 80.1 57.1 36.5 57.7 63.1 59.0 98.6 50.2 55.4 77.3 61.6 83.2 179 1033,100 47,000 31 - 86.5 50 - 1,000 356 A --<0.110 <0.110 <0.100 <0.096 <0.110 <0.1005.9<0.090 <0.0941.9<0.0862.4<0.081 <0.30 <0.0071 <0.39 <0.07414 200 <1 - 9 1.0 - 10 4.3 B --64.5 85.3 24.2 91.8 18.4 49.6158 12.4 3.7 182 40.0 90.1 41.6<1.59.6 52.6 10.10.31 6.5 10 - 24.4 7.0 - 300 65 A --14.6 10 8 13.3 8.5 7 34.7 9.3 11.6 26.9 6.8 15.6 10 9.7 9.5 36 9630 9,300 NE 3.0 - 100 34 A --19 25.3 19 20 8.5 16 38.7 11.9 3.1 26.1 22.7 25.4 25<1.56.9 5.8 3.6400 800 4 - 20.5 BRL - 50 16 A --0.029 0.036 0.033 0.045 0.069 0.044 0.2 0.044 0.013 0.049 0.023 0.049 0.016<0.00390.083 0.0097 0.0662.3 9.7 BRL - <0.25 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 A --11.5 4.8 6.5 4 4.1 1.7 10.7 3.2 1.3 11.4 2.8 5 4.5 2.7 2.9 30.9 4.1310 4,700 NE BRL - 150 23 A --2 2.6 1.7 2.1 3.0 1.9 2.3 1.3 1.4<3.71.3 1.3 1.2<3.02.5<3.92.078 1,200 NE <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 A --0.73<0.550 <0.510 <0.480 <0.570 <0.5003.6 0.51 0.58<1.8 <0.430 <0.4500.53<1.50.38<1.90.7178 1,200 NE BRL - 5.0 NE C --183 256 124359128 194 169 105 76.2322127 215 189 35.2 148 77.3 87.478 120 NE 15 - 300 107 A --30.7 30.4 36.5 19.5 23.4 13.5 44.4 27.1 53 64.1 15.4 83.3 23.8 23.4 18.3 22.3 28.14,700 70,000 NE 25 - 124 56 A --NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Ref.A. North Carolina soilsB. Southeastern USA soilsC. Major- and Trace-Element Concentrations in Soils from Two Continental-Scale Transects of the United States and Canada, U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey. Open-File Report 2005-1253, Table 3. 2005.3) EPA Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure hazardous waste threshold level, 2004Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold and highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial use PSRGs (and above regional background concentrations for metals).Bold, highlighted, and underlined values indicate total concentration exceeds 20 times the TCLP regulatory levelVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act .NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; -- = Not Applicable; NR = Not ReportedBQL = Below Laboratory Quantitation Limits; BRL = Below Reporting Limit; mg/L = milligrams per literJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; D = Constituent was analyzed using a second dilution.U = Constituent was not detected using a second dilution; B = Constituent was also detected in the control blank.Sources:S&ME, Soil Assessment Report - Aquair Site, October 2003.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.mg/kgTerraconScreening CriteriaRegional Background Metals In Soil2TCLP Regulatory Threshold3Unrestricted Use PSRGs1 Industrial/ CommercialPSRGs1Site-Specific Background Metals in SoilS:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 1 (Page 5 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 (Page 1 of 2)Summary of Groundwater Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled ByS&MESample ID AMW-101 AMW-106* AMW-403 AMW-405*AMW-410*AMW-411* AMW-503 AMW-612* DW-1* DW-2 DW-3* DW-4Most Recent Sample Date 7/27/2011 3/3/2005 9/21/2006 3/4/2005 3/4/2005 7/28/2011 9/21/2006 7/28/2011 7/28/2011 9/21/2006 6/4/2004 9/21/2006Well Depth (ft bgs) 36 28 73 67 68 90 150 154 40 27 34 51UnitsVOCs (8260)Benzene0.001BRL<0.0010BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL<0.010 BRL<0.00100.001 0.069Carbon Tetrachloride3.22BRL0.011BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL0.68BRL <0.00100.0003 0.018Chloroform2.96BRL0.095BRL BRL BRL0.0028BRL BRL0.4BRL <0.00100.07 0.0361,1-Dichloroethane0.0938BRL0.0013BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.010 BRL <0.00100.006 0.331,2-Dichloroethane0.0628BRL0.0043BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL0.017BRL <0.00100.0004 0.0981,1-Dichloroethene0.366BRL0.011BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL0.11BRL <0.00100.35 0.16cis-1,2-Dichloroethene0.17BRL0.024BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL0.13BRL <0.00100.07 NEMethylene Chloride0.0324BRL0.023BRL BRL BRL <0.0020 BRL BRL <0.020 BRL <0.00200.005 41,1,1,2-Tetrahloroethane0.0012NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.001 0.16Tetrachloroethene3.86BRL0.075BRL BRL BRL0.0034BRL BRL0.85BRL <0.00100.0007 0.0481,1,1-Trichloroethane0.216BRL0.0012BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.010 BRL <0.00100.2 6.21,1,2-Trichloroethane0.0086BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.010 BRL <0.00100.006 0.0052Trichloroethene2.48BRL0.085BRL BRL BRL0.0031BRL BRL0.71BRL <0.00100.003 0.0044SVOCs (8270)BRLNANANANANANANANANANANA----RCRA Metals (3010/3030c/245.1)Arsenic<0.0050 BRL NA BRL0.0059NA NA BRL BRL NA0.011NA0.01--Chromium0.0475NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.01--Chromium III 0.0475NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANE--Chromium VI<0.000050 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANE--Manganese0.99NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.05--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02L.0202 Groundwater Quality Standard (April 2013).2) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018)Only those compounds detected above the 2L Standard or Non-Residential GWSL in at least one sample shown above (Chromium VI is shown since it was speciated.Bold and highlighted indicates an exceedance in the NCAC 2L Groundwater StandardBold, highlighted, and underlined indicates an exceedance in the DEQ DWM Non-Residential GWSLMethod number follows parameter in parenthesismg/L = milligrams per liter; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = Semi-VOCs; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; BRL = below laboratory reporting limitsNE = Not Established; NA= Not Analyzed, -- = not applicable* = Lab report not available to specify reporting limitSources:Shield Engineering, Inc., Remedial Action Progress Report - Aquair, September 2011.S&ME, Inc., Remedial Investigation Report - Aquair Site, October 2001.mg/LShield Engineering, INC.NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard(1)DWM Vapor Intrusion Non-Residential GWSLs(2)S:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 2 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 (Page 2 of 2)Summary of Groundwater Analytical DataAquAir II Brownfields PropertyCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. TKC-004Sampled ByDelta Environmental ConsultantsSample ID MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4* MW-5* MW-6 MW-7* MW-8* MW-9 MW-10 RW-2 RW-3Most Recent Sample Date 7/28/2011 7/28/2011 7/28/2011 3/2/2005 3/2/2005 7/28/2011 3/3/1992 3/2/2005 7/28/2011 7/28/2011 9/22/2006 9/22/2006Well Depth (ft bgs) 27272522272215222022105150UnitsVOCs (8260)Benzene<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 NA BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.100 <0.0100.0010.069Carbon Tetrachloride0.07250.0025<0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.010 BRL <0.0010 <0.00108.82.00.00030.018Chloroform0.2460.0081 0.0036BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL0.0018<0.00102.21.70.07 0.0361,1-Dichloroethane 0.0035<0.0010 <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.100 <0.0100.006 0.331,2-Dichloroethane0.0129<0.0010 <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 NA BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.100 <0.0100.0004 0.0981,1-Dichloroethene<0.00100.0128 0.001BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.1000.088 0.35 0.16cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.0045<0.0010 <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.1000.0760.07 NEMethylene Chloride<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 BRL BRL <0.00200.008 BBRL <0.0020 <0.00200.25 0.3200.005 41,1,1,2-Tetrahloroethane<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 NA NA <0.0010 NA NA <0.0010 <0.0010 NA NA0.001 0.16Tetrachloroethene0.06390.1640.0031BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL0.0019<0.00101.11.00.0007 0.0481,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.002<0.0010 <0.0010 BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.1000.025 0.2 6.21,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.0037<0.0010 <0.001 BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.100 <0.0100.006 0.0052Trichloroethene0.02310.02480.0018BRL BRL <0.0010 <0.005 BRL0.0019<0.00100.530.5500.003 0.0044NA BRL NA NA NA BRL NA NA NA BRL NA NA----RCRA Metals (3010/3030c/245.1)ArsenicNA0.0067NA BRL BRL0.0054NA BRL NA0.0052NA NA0.01--ChromiumNA0.0175NA NA NA <0.0050 NA NA NA <0.0050 NA NA0.01--Chromium IIINA0.0175NA NA NA <0.0050 NA NA NA <0.0050 NA NANE--Chromium VINA <0.000050 NA NA NA <0.00005 NA NA NA <0.000050 NA NANE--ManganeseNA0.785NA NA NA0.778NA NA NA0.0171NA NA0.05--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02L.0202 Groundwater Quality Standard (April 2013).2) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018)Only those compounds detected above the 2L Standard or Non-Residential GWSL in at least one sample shown above (Chromium VI is shown since it was speciated.Bold and highlighted indicates an exceedance in the NCAC 2L Groundwater StandardBold, highlighted, and underlined indicates an exceedance in the DEQ DWM Non-Residential GWSLMethod number follows parameter in parenthesismg/L = milligrams per liter; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = Semi-VOCs; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; BRL = below laboratory reporting limitsNE = Not Established; NA= Not Analyzed, -- = not applicable* = Lab report not available to specify reporting limitSources:Shield Engineering, Inc., Remedial Action Progress Report - Aquair, September 2011.NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard(1)DWM Vapor Intrusion Non-Residential GWSLs(2)S&ME, Inc., Remedial Investigation Report - Aquair Site, October 2001.mg/LShield Engineering, INC.Shield Engineering, INC.S:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP Tables8/17/2018Table 2 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data AquAir II Brownfields Property Charlotte, North CarolinaHart & Hickman Project No. TKC-004Carbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzeneChloroform1,2-Dichloroethane1,1-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethylenem,p-XyleneSSGS-110/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC1605047<2.0 <2.07.8<5.3 <3.41,900 2912<2.78220SSGS-210/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC300,0007311,000 1,200 27,00022<211,600700,000150 8,900780 110,00061SSGS-310/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC11<0.469.8<0.40 <0.407.4 0.30<0.6968301.4<0.551.822SSGS-410/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC13,000,000 100,000 700,000 67,000 120,000 42,000<43,00024,000 16,000,00068,0001,400,000<22,0002,000,000 34,000SSGS-510/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC56,0007.58,1002.8 47<8.73,600<1416,0002.4 350<11570<17SSGS-610/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC480.49 4.6 0.55 0.63 6.9 1.4<0.6963264.8 0.25 8.618SSGS-710/28/11 TO-15Hart & Hickman, PC14<0.469.6 0.28<0.4014 0.79<0.6914562.2<0.551.641SV-0112/15/15 TO-15Terracon<30 <22 <23 <19 <18 <20 <200 <32 <3238<26 <26 <25 <20SV-0212/15/15 TO-15Terracon<30 <22 <23 <19 <18 <20 <200 <21 <20270<16 <16 <16 <13SV-0312/15/15 TO-15Terracon<30 <22 <23 <19 <18 <20 <200 <32 <32100<26 <26 <25 <20SV-0412/15/15 TO-15Terracon<7.7 <5.6 <6.0 <5.0 <4.815<52 <8.4 <8.3130<6.7 <6.7 <6.6672,000 4,400 530 470 18,000 4,900 560 1,700 3,500 440,000 440,000 18180 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018)2) Only those analytes detected in at least one sample are shown in this table3)Bold and highlighted indicates compound exceeds Non-Residential SGSL at a TCR of 1 X 10¯5 and THQ of 0.2NE = Not Established, µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meterOnly compounds detected above the Non-Residential SGSL in at least one sample shownTCR = target cancer riskTHQ = target hazard quotientSources:Hart & Hickman, PC, Soil Vapor Assessment Report - Former AquAir Facililty, November 29, 2011.Terracon Consultants, Inc., Limited Site Investigation Report - Aquair II Brownfields Site, January 7, 2016.Non-Residential SGSLs(1)(TCR = 1 x 10-5 and THQ = 0.2)Analytical MethodConsultantSample IDSampling Date µg/m3S:\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\EMP\Draft EMP\EMP TablesEMP Tables8/16/2018Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
SITE
0 2000
4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA, 1996
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
8/16/18 0
1TKC-004
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 2
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH HISTORICAL FEATURES
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
FENCE
AREA OF POTENTIAL SOIL CONTAMINATION1
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
3.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
FACILITY
AREA OF DRAIN LINE EFFLUENT RUNOFF
12" DRAIN LINE
CONCRETE
SEWER
PRODUCTION BUILDING
LAB BUILDING
NOTES
1.HISTORICAL SITE FEATURES REMOVED FROM THE
SITE IN 2000.\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG 2 & 4 Detailed Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 2, 8/17/2018 10:26:28 AM, erichardson
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 3
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS SITE BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
SURFACE WATER FEATURE
FENCE LINE
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT2
PROPOSED PARKING/ IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES2
PROPOSED ROAD2
AREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL
CONTAMINATION1
ACTIVE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL (ABANDONED IN 2017)
DEEP GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
(ABANDONED IN 2017)
GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
(ABANDONED IN 2017)
AIR SPARGE WELL
(ABANDONED IN 2017)
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL (ABANDONED IN JUNE 2018)
DEEP GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
(ABANDONED IN JUNE 2018)
GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
(ABANDONED IN JUNE 2018)
AIR SPARGE WELL
(ABANDONED IN JUNE 2018)
AIR SPARGE WELL
(DESTROYED)SAM NEELY ROAD
ALRO STEEL CORP.
(12933 SAM NEELY ROAD)
FORMER REMEDIATION
SYSTEM BUILDING
LAZY OAK LANE
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
TEXAS PIPE & SUPPLY CO.
(12910 SAM NEELY ROAD)
EXISTING STAPLES
WAREHOUSE BUILDING
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
POND
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.SITE PLAN EXHIBIT, BURTON ENGINEERING, 6/6/18.
3.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
4.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
FORMER
PRODUCTION
BUILDING
FORMER
LAB
BUILDING
FUTURE
CAROWINDS
BOULEVARD
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG 3 Site & Surrounding Area Map-R1.dwg, FIG 3, 8/17/2018 10:23:07 AM, erichardson
MW-9
MW-10
DW-4
MW-4
AMW-411
DW-2
RW-3
MW-3
MW-2
AMW-101
RW-2
SB-10
SB-08
SB-05
SB-03
SB-02
SB-01
SB-04
SB-06
SB-11
SB-12
SB-13
SB-16/SV-03
SB-15/SV-02
SB-14/SV-01
SB-17/SV-04
AMW-503AMW-403
DW-3 MW-6
MW-7
MW-5
AMW-405
MW-8 DW-1
AMW-612
AMW-106
AMW-410
SSGS-3
SSGS-2
SSGS-5
SSGS-4
SSGS-1
AAH-34
APH-42
AAH-31
APH-59
SS-03
SSGS-6
SSGS-7
MW-1
S-4
APH-58
APH-24
S-6
APH-32
SED-3
SED-5
S-3S-2S-1
SB-07
SB-09
AAH-38
AAH-1
AAH-09
AAH-14
AAH-17 AAH-25
AAH-33
AAH-49
AAH-47
AAH-51
APH-20
SED-1
SED-4
SED-2
SED-7
SED-6
SS-5
SS-8
SS-7
SS-4
SS-6
SUMP-1
SUMP-2
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 4
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT2
PROPOSED PARKING/ IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES2
AREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL
CONTAMINATION1
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
DEEP GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
LOCATION
SOIL/ SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SURFACE SOIL-GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL AND SOIL GAS SAMPLE
LOCATION
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY GREENHOME &
O'MARA (1990)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY DELTA
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS (DELTA)
(1992)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY SHIELD, S&ME, OR
DELTA (1992-2011)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY GERAGHTY &
MILLER (1996)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY S&ME (1997)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY S&ME (2003)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY HART & HICKMAN,
PC (2011)
SAMPLE COLLECTED BY TERRACON (2015)
NOTES
1.SEDIMENT SAMPLES SED-1, SED-2, SED-3 AND
SED-4 WERE ALSO SAMPLED BY S&ME IN 1997.
DW-4
SSGS-1
SS-5
SB-07
AAH-17
S-2
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.SITE PLAN EXHIBIT, BURTON ENGINEERING, 6/6/18.
3.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
4.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
SS-03
SED-5
FORMER
PRODUCTION
BUILDING
FORMER
LAB
BUILDING
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG 2 & 4 Detailed Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 4, 8/17/2018 11:35:36 AM, erichardson
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 5
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH SOIL AND SEDIMENT
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT2
PROPOSED PARKING/ IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES2
AREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL
CONTAMINATION1
SOIL/ SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL AND SOIL GAS SAMPLE
LOCATION
SOIL SAMPLE CONTAINS CONCENTRATIONS
OF TOTAL METALS AND/OR CHLORINATED
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS WHICH
EXCEED 20 TIMES THE TOXICITY
CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE
REGULATORY LEVEL AND THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (DEQ) INACTIVE
HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES BRANCH (IHSB)
INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL PRELIMINARY
SOIL REMEDIATION GOALS (PSRGs)
(FEBRUARY 2018).
SOIL SAMPLE CONTAINS CONCENTRATIONS
OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS OR
METALS ABOVE THE
INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL PSRGs (AND
REGIONAL BACKGROUND
CONCENTRATIONS FOR METALS).
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.SITE PLAN EXHIBIT, BURTON ENGINEERING, 6/6/18.
3.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
4.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
SB-17
SB-11
SB-13
SB-16
SB-15
SED-4
SS-5
SS-8
AAH-34
APH-42S-4
SS-7
SS-4
AAH-31
SS-6 APH-59
APH-58
SS-03
APH-24
S-6
SUMP-1
SUMP-2
APH-32
SED-3
SED-5
S-3S-2S-1
SB-07
SB-10
SB-08
SB-05
SB-03
SB-02
SB-01
SB-04
SB-06
SB-12
SB-09
SB-14
AAH-38
AAH-1
AAH-09
AAH-14
AAH-17 AAH-25
AAH-33
AAH-49
AAH-47
AAH-51
APH-20
SED-1
SED-2
SED-7
SED-6
SS-03
SS-4
FORMER
PRODUCTION
BUILDING
FORMER
LAB
BUILDING
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG5-7 Detailed Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 5, 8/17/2018 11:37:12 AM, erichardson
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 6
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH GROUNDWATER SAMPLE
LOCATIONS
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT2
PROPOSED PARKING/ IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES2
AREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL
CONTAMINATION1
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
DEEP GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
LOCATION
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE CONTAINS
CONCENTRATIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS (VOCs) AND/OR METALS THAT
EXCEED THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY (DEQ) 15A NORTH CAROLINA
ADMINSTRATIVE CODE (NCAC) 02L:0202
(2L STANDARDS) GROUNDWATER QUALITY
STANDARD (APRIL 2013).
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE CONTAINS
CONCENTRATIONS OF VOCs OR METALS
THAT EXCEED THE DEQ 2L STANDARDS
AND ARE ABOVE THE DEQ DIVISION OF
WASTE MANAGEMENT (DWM)
NON-RESIDENTIAL VAPOR INTRUSION
GROUNDWATER SCREENING LEVELS
(GWSL) (FEBRUARY 2018).
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.SITE PLAN EXHIBIT, BURTON ENGINEERING, 6/6/18.
3.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
4.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
AMW-612
AMW-405
AMW-410
MW-9
DW-2
AMW-503AMW-403
DW-3 MW-6
MW-7
MW-5
MW-10
DW-4
MW-4
AMW-411
RW-3
MW-3
MW-2
AMW-101
MW-1
RW-2
MW-8 DW-1
AMW-106
DW-3
MW-1
FORMER
PRODUCTION
BUILDING
FORMER
LAB
BUILDING
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG5-7 Detailed Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 6, 8/17/2018 11:37:44 AM, erichardson
SSGS-2
SSGS-5
SSGS-4
SSGS-1
SSGS-3
SV-03
SV-02
SV-01
SV-04
SSGS-6
SSGS-7
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. TKC-004
DATE: 8-17-18
FIGURE NO. 7
AQUAIR II BROWNFIELD PROPERTY
13300 SAM NEELY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN WITH SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION1
RAILROAD TRACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINT2
PROPOSED PARKING/ IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES2
AREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL
CONTAMINATION1
SUB-SURFACE SOIL-GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL AND SOIL GAS SAMPLE
LOCATION
SOIL GAS SAMPLE CONTAINS
CONCENTRATIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS ABOVE THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY (DEQ) DIVISION OF WASTE
MANAGEMENT (DWM) NON-RESIDENTIAL
SUB-SLAB AND EXTERIOR SOIL GAS
SCREENING LEVELS (SGSLs) (FEBRUARY
2018)
SOURCES
1.EXHIBIT B - TO THE NOTICE OF BROWNFIELDS
PROPERTY - SURVEY PLAT, JAMES MAUREY &
ASSOCIATES, P.A., 4/30/15.
2.SITE PLAN EXHIBIT, BURTON ENGINEERING, 6/6/18.
3.BASE MAP OF THE HISTORICAL FEATURES FROM
S&ME, REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT ,
OCTOBER 2011.
4.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
SSGS-4
FORMER
PRODUCTION
BUILDING
FORMER
LAB
BUILDING
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\The Keith Corporation\TKC-004 West Side\EMP\Figures\FIG5-7 Detailed Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 7, 8/17/2018 11:38:19 AM, erichardson
Appendix A

Preliminary Redevelopment Plan
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
XXR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WSAM NEELY ROAD
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUCHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCEASPHALT PAV
ING
2
4
"

CM
P GATEC
H
A
I
N

L
I
N
K
F
E
N
C
E
METALBUILDINGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
E
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESS
E
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSER/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W
S4
8
°
0
0
'
3
3
"
W
24
3
.
6
0
'N63°24'38"W243.85'N63°21'37"W67.56'NORFOLK SOUTHERNS15° 10' 01.19"E426.15'WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWETWETWET WETWET WET
WET WETWE
T
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE
T
WETWETWETWETWETWET
W
E
T
WETWETR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WSSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSEN23°49'36"W946.67'100'
CLASS
A
BUFFERREDUCED TO
75
'
W
/
BERMSSSS20'
SSZ
15'
ULZ
20'SSZ15'ULZ20'SSZ 15'ULZ20'SSZ15'ULZ
-1+
0
0
0
+
0
0
1
+
0
0
2
+
0
0 3+004+005+006
+
0
0
7+
0
08+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0016+23
SSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSER/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W0
+
0
0
1
+
0
0
2+0
0
3+00
4+004+99
SSE SSESSE SSE
810'918'260'PROPOSED BUILDING13006 SAM NEELY RD, CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINAFFE = 632.00'60'108'200'STA:10+48STA:11+15STA:9+71STA:13+30STA:8+16STA:17+120+00STA:20+000+000+00STA:22+00STA:22+00773.01
'778.40'796.39
'
157.7
3
'SAM NEELY ROAD(FUTURE CAROWINDS BLVD)CDOT MAINTAINED100' R/WSTA:14+80STA:8+35STA:10+64STA:12+13P:\DWG\017.554.026 GILCHRIST SOUTH - SITE\017.554.026 WLP - NORTH BLDG.DWG BROWNFIELD 1 7/20/2018 2:28:42 PM HP02.CTB JMENOR
PROJECT NUMBERDATE
DRAWN BY
ENG
CTB
PM
CTB
REVISIONS
THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OFBURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND ISNOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED INWHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USEDON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100CHARLOTTE NC 28210(T) 704.553.8881www.burtoneng.comFIRM #C-1157CHARLOTTE, NCSheet of 3613005 SAM NEELY ROAD
2018.06.06
WESTINGHOUSE LOGISTICS PARK SOUTH
SITE PLAN EXHIBIT017.554.0261B1002018.03.08
MBDGKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTRUE NORTHTRUE NORTHDRAWING INFORMATION( IN FEET )0000001 inch = 60 ft.0603060120240LIMITS OFGROUNDWATERCONTAMINATIONSECTION B-BSECTION C-CSECTION A-A1 - 7/20/2018 - UPDATED PLAN
Sheet 1 of 3AREA OFPOSSIBLE SOILCONTAMINATIONPROP. BUILDING 1710,640 SF ±470' x 1512'LOT 1FFE = 633.50
Appendix B

Grading Plan
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
XXR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WSAM NEELY ROAD
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUCHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCEASPHALT PAV
ING
2
4
"

CM
P GATEC
H
A
I
N

L
I
N
K
F
E
N
C
E
METALBUILDINGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
E
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESS
E
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSER/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W
S4
8
°
0
0
'
3
3
"
W
24
3
.
6
0
'N63°24'38"W243.85'N63°21'37"W67.56'NORFOLK SOUTHERNS15° 10' 01.19"E426.15'WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWETWET WETWETWETWET WETWET WET
WET WETWE
T
WET
WETWETWETWETWETWETWETWE
T
WETWETWETWETWETWET
W
E
T
WETWETR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WSSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSE SSEN23°49'36"W946.67'100'
CLASS
A
BUFFERREDUCED TO
75
'
W
/
BERMSSSS20'
SSZ
15'
ULZ
20'SSZ15'ULZ20'SSZ 15'ULZ20'SSZ15'ULZ
-1+
0
0
0
+
0
0
1
+
0
0
2
+
0
0 3+004+005+006
+
0
0
7+
0
08+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0016+23
SSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSE
SSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSESSER/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/W0
+
0
0
1
+
0
0
2+0
0
3+00
4+004+99
SSE SSESSE SSE
810'918'260'PROPOSED BUILDING13006 SAM NEELY RD, CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINAFFE = 632.00'60'108'200'STA:10+48STA:11+15STA:9+71STA:13+30STA:8+16STA:17+120+00STA:20+000+000+00STA:22+00STA:22+00773.01
'778.40'796.39
'
157.7
3
'SAM NEELY ROAD(FUTURE CAROWINDS BLVD)CDOT MAINTAINED100' R/WSTA:14+80STA:8+35STA:10+64STA:12+13P:\DWG\017.554.026 GILCHRIST SOUTH - SITE\017.554.026 WLP - NORTH BLDG.DWG BROWNFIELD 2 7/20/2018 2:28:54 PM HP02.CTB JMENOR
PROJECT NUMBERDATE
DRAWN BY
ENG
CTB
PM
CTB
REVISIONS
THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OFBURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND ISNOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED INWHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USEDON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100CHARLOTTE NC 28210(T) 704.553.8881www.burtoneng.comFIRM #C-1157CHARLOTTE, NCSheet of 3613005 SAM NEELY ROAD
2018.06.06
WESTINGHOUSE LOGISTICS PARK SOUTH
GRADING PLAN EXHIBIT017.554.0261B2002018.03.08
MBDGKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTRUE NORTHTRUE NORTHDRAWING INFORMATION( IN FEET )0000001 inch = 60 ft.0603060120240LIMITS OFGROUNDWATERCONTAMINATIONSECTION B-BSECTION C-CSECTION A-A1 - 7/20/2018 - UPDATED PLAN
Sheet 2 of 3AREA OFPOSSIBLE SOILCONTAMINATIONPROP. BUILDING 1710,640 SF ±470' x 1512'LOT 1FFE = 633.50
6156206306406156166186206226246266286306326346366386406426440+000+250+500+751+001+251+501+752+002+252+502+753+003+253+503+754+004+254+504+755+005+255+505+756+006+256+506+757+007+257+507+758+008+258+508+759+009+259+509+7510+0010+2510+5010+7511+0011+2511+5011+7512+0012+2512+5012+7513+0013+2513+5013+7514+0014+2514+5014+7515+0015+2515+5015+7516+0016+2516+5016+7517+0017+2517+5017+7518+0018+2518+5018+7519+0019+2519+5019+7520+0020+2520+5020+7521+0021+2521+5021+7522+006106206306406106126146166186206226246266286306326346366386406426440+000+250+500+751+001+251+501+752+002+252+502+753+003+253+503+754+004+254+504+755+005+255+505+756+006+256+506+757+007+257+507+758+008+258+508+759+009+259+509+7510+0010+2510+5010+7511+0011+2511+5011+7512+0012+2512+5012+7513+0013+2513+5013+7514+0014+2514+5014+7515+0015+2515+5015+7516+0016+2516+5016+7517+0017+2517+5017+7518+0018+2518+5018+7519+0019+2519+5019+7520+0020+2520+5020+7521+0021+2521+5021+7522+006106206306406506106126146166186206226246266286306326346366386406426446466486500+000+250+500+751+001+251+501+752+002+252+502+753+003+253+503+754+004+254+504+755+005+255+505+756+006+256+506+757+007+257+507+758+008+258+508+759+009+259+509+7510+0010+2510+5010+7511+0011+2511+5011+7512+0012+2512+5012+7513+0013+2513+5013+7514+0014+2514+5014+7515+0015+2515+5015+7516+0016+2516+5016+7517+0017+2517+5017+7518+0018+2518+5018+7519+0019+2519+5019+7520+00BROWNFIELD SECTIONSSECTION A-ASECTION B-BSECTION C-CPROPOSEDGRADE(FILL)PROPOSEDGRADE(FILL)PROPOSEDGRADE(FILL)PROPOSEDGRADE(CUT)EXISTINGGRADEEXISTINGGRADEEXISTINGGRADEEXISTINGGRADESTA:10+48.00ELEV:633.60STA:11+15.00ELEV:632.60STA:9+71.00ELEV:633.10STA:13+30.00ELEV:626.80STA:8+16.00ELEV:627.90STA:17+12.00ELEV:619.45STA:10+64.00ELEV:632.71STA:12+13.00ELEV:629.64STA:8+35.00ELEV:628.30STA:14+80.06ELEV:620.15P:\DWG\017.554.026 GILCHRIST SOUTH - SITE\017.554.026 WLP - NORTH BLDG.DWG BROWNFIELD 3 7/20/2018 2:29:03 PM HP02.CTB JMENOR
PROJECT NUMBERDATE
DRAWN BY
ENG
CTB
PM
CTB
REVISIONS
THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OFBURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND ISNOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED INWHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USEDON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100CHARLOTTE NC 28210(T) 704.553.8881www.burtoneng.comFIRM #C-1157CHARLOTTE, NCSheet of 3613005 SAM NEELY ROAD
2018.06.06
WESTINGHOUSE LOGISTICS PARK SOUTH
SECTIONS017.554.0263B3002018.03.08
MBDGKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWING INFORMATION( IN FEET )0000001 inch = 60 ft.0603060120240LIMITS OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATIONLIMITS OF GROUNDWATERCONTAMINATIONLIMITS OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATIONAREA OFPOSSIBLESOILCONTAMINATIONAREA OF POSSIBLE SOIL CONTAMINATIONSheet 3 of 31 - 7/20/2018 - UPDATED SECTIONS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X XX
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX
WB-67 - Interstate Semi-
T
r
a
i
l
e
r WB-67 - Interstate Semi-TrailerXXXXXXXXXXXXXXR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WR/WFENCE OVER PROPERTYLINE: 0.8'OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUCHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCEASPHALT PAVING CHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK FENCECHAIN LINK
FENCECHAIN LINK FENCE
GAT
E
CHAIN LI
N
K
FENCE
METALBUILD
ING
WETWETWETWETWET
WETWET
WET
R/W R/W
R/W
R/W R/W
R/
W
639.5 i
n
v
.

o
u
t
EX. 2
4
"

R
C
P
approx.

6
3
9
.
2 20'SSZ15'ULZ20'SSZ15'ULZ20'SSZ15'ULZ20'SSZ15'ULZR/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/W
R/W
R/
W
R/
W
R/
W
R/W
R/W
R/W
P:\DWG\017.554.026 GILCHRIST SOUTH - SITE\8. XREFS\GDE.DWG C4.0 OVERALL GRADING (10) 7/12/2018 1:05:17 PM HP02.CTB MGRAHAM017.603.002
PROJECT NUMBERSAM NEELY RDCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINAWESTINGHOUSE LOGISTICS PARK SOUTHCUT/FILL EXHIBITTHIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF
BURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND IS
NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN
WHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USED
ON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BE
RETURNED UPON REQUEST.
5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100
CHARLOTTE NC 28210
(T) 704.553.8881
burtonengineering.com
07/12/2018
DATE
Area of Cut
Area of Fill
Area of Contamination
Area to be Disturbed: 2,902,303-sft (66.6-ac)
Soil to be excavated: 264,795-cy
Soil to be placed: 264,795-cy
Soil to be imported: 0-cy
Soil to be exported: 0-cy
BROWNFIELD DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION

Appendix C

Construction Schedule