20181217 Ver 1_401 Application_20180818

PJD Request and PCN Application
for
McAlpine Greenway Providence -Sardis Connector
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Determination Prepared By (Agent):
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Determination Prepared For (Owner):
Mecklenburg County Real Estate Services
attn: Mr. Bert Lynn
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte NC 28208
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: McAlpine Greenway Sardis
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
To construct a 10 foot wide at -grade paved greenway trail within an existing cleared sanitary sewer line easement and cleared
maintenance access route to connect Sardis Road, Providence Road, and Mountainview Drive in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County NC.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Mecklenburg County Real Estate Services
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS, P.O. Box 163, High Shoals, NC, 28077 phone [phone]
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2009-01376 and 2009-01131
7. Project Location Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Lat 35.1323 Long -80.7737, Located within sanitary sewer easement on south side of McAlpine Creek
between Providence Rd, Sardis Rd, and Mountainview Dr in Charlotte, Meckenburg County, NC
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 2130-9106 thru 9135, 2133-5102, -5105, -5106
9. Project Location— County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: McAlpine Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: South Side McAlpine Cr. Sardis -Providence
City, State:
Charlotte NC
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 2130-9106 to 9135, 2133-5102, -5105,
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Craiq R. Wyant RLA/SWS
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Telephone Number: 704-240-0793
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mecklenburg County Real Estate Svc.
Mailing Address: 3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 101
Charlotte NC 28208
Telephone Number: 980-314-2503
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
August 25, 2018
Date Digitally signed by Craig Wyant
Craig Wyant DN: cn=Craig Wyant, c=US
Date: 2018.08.26 15:25:53 -04-00-
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
aI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑✓ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 7 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.1823
-80.7737
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

W aters_Na
DP -1 McAlpine Creek
DP -3 Intermittent UT McAlpine Creek
DP -7 UT McAlpine Creek
DP -12 Intermittent UT McAlpine Creek
DP -14 Intermittent UT McAlpine Creek
DP -15/16 Floodplain Wetland
State
Cowardin_Code
HGM_Code
Meas Type
Amount Units
Waters Type
Latitude
Longitude Local—Waterway
NORTH CAROLINA
R2UB
RIVERINE
Linear
5,172 FOOT
RPW
35.13680000
-80.76860000 McAlpine Creek
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
60 FOOT
RPW
35.13620000
-80.76890000 McAlpine Creek
NORTH CAROLINA
R3UB
RIVERINE
Linear
100 FOOT
RPW
35.13070000
-80.77580000 McAlpine Creek
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
260 FOOT
RPW
35.25860000
-80.77030000 McAlpine Creek
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
30 FOOT
RPW
35.13070000
-80.77430000 McAlpine Creek
NORTH CAROLINA
PEM1
RIVERINE
Area
0.22 ACRE
RPWWD
35.12970000
-80.77860000 McAlpine Creek

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: McAlpine Greenway
Tax Parcel ID Numbers: 2130-9106 thru 9135, 2133-5102, -5105, -5106
STREET ADDRESS: Along South Side of McAlpine Creek between Providence Road and
Sardis Road
PROPERTY OWNER: Mecklenburg County Real Estate Services
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize:
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS of A Fine Line Design
(Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
Agent Signature: A v Date: March 26, 2018
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/or NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations, if necessary,
and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Waters Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am the duly
authorized owner of record of the property identified herein.
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT: zUT LL#-iO , tl olft6 MA\)A M -
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Date: bi //,2,1 Date:

s POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Essues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21335102 21335102
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NIA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG CDHNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
9� REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6OU E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
',R' POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs IQ
21309108 21349106
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 60U E 4TH S1 111H FLOUR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TF ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21335105 21335105
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Malting Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLUOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
N REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report lasues More Map Apps
Search Results ILayersAahels IProperty Report Zoom To -
Parcel ID GIS ID
21309109 21309109
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mai nq Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 600E 4TH ST 11TH FLOUR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 60C E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Par€et ID GIS ID
21335106 21335106
Address located on Property (Postal Crtyr)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Yo REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
{1i3 POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel IQ
GIs ID
21349110 21309110
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name
Malting Address
60C E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28282
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT. CHARLOTTE NC 28282
Parcel Ownership, Source: Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS

(nV'
POLARIS 3
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIS ID
18729199 18729199
Address located on Property (Postal. City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 6C0 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
N REAL_ ESTATE /FINANCE 6CU E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
nntft,... POLARIS 3G
TLitorials Quick Tips Report Issues More . •..
Searrh Re5ult5 LayersfLaheLs property Report Zoom To
Par€et ID GIS ID
21349116 21309116
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Malting Address
6C0 E 4TH. 5T 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
X REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6C0 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 282D2
nff"J'
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21349114 21309114
Address located an Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
60C EAST 4TH SL 11TH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28203
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 EAST 4TH SL 11111
FLOOR
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 282D2
POLARIS 3C
TutoriaLs Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21349115
21309115
Address located on Property
(Postal City)
NA
Owner Name
Malting Address
G00 EAST 4TH 5T 11TH
MECKLENBURG CDVINTY
FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 2824)2
600 EAST 4TH 5T 11TH
96 REAL ESTATE %FINANCE
FLOOR
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3C
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
r�• ..�� at r.
Parcel iD GIs lD
21349134 21309134
Address located on Property (PostaL City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
o REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6UU EAST 4TH ST 11TH
FLOOR
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3a
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIS ID
21349117
21309117
Address located on Property (PoAaL City)
NA
Owner Name Malting Address
64Q E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MFCI€LENBHRG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 25202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6GC E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Parcel Ownership, Source: Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS

POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
n ----I Ln
GIs ID
21349118 21309118
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 600E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
N REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
nF.,
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21349121 21309121
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
' {h POLARIS 3
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIS ID
21349119 21309119
Address 4ocated on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG [MINTY
CHARLOTFE NC 28202
X REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 604 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS
Searrh Results � Pro-perty Report Zoom To
Parcel ID GIs ID
21349122 21309122
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
,L, POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21349120 21309120
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG CaIJNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28302
P3LARIS 3
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel -11)
GIs ID
21349123 21309123
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 640 E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Parcel Ownership, Source: Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS

(rf, P 0 L A F US 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Par€el Id 615 ID
21349123 21309123
Address located on Property (Postat City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
N REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
rnAM). POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID 615 ID
21309127 21309127
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
604 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE JFINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
rn'X
QuickPOLARIS 3GTutorials
Search Results Layers7La6els Property Report Zoom Ta
Par€el ID 615 ID
21309235 21309235
Address located (in Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name
Mailing Address
Owner Name
600 EAST FOURTH 5T
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Mailing Address
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
C/O REAL ESTATE FINANCE 600 EAST FOURTH 51
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
, nrim".)
PLRIS 3G
Tutorials Quick
Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
CHARLOTTE NC 28207
Parcel ID GIs ID
21309128 21309128
Address located on Property (Postal City)
,a
{ P 0 L A R I S 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Reporz Issues More Map Apps
Par€et ID 615 ID
21309125 21309126
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
Owner Name Mailing Address
604 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE JFINANCE 60C E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Par€el ID 615 fD
21309129 21309129
Address located on Property (Postal City)
NA
NA
Owner Name
Mailing Address
Owner Name
Mailing Address
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CHARLOTTE NC 28207
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
W REAL ESTATE JFINANCE
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Parcel Ownership, Source: Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS

{ •I,h POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21309134 21309130
Address located on Property (Postal City)
116 OLD SELL RD CHARLOTTE NC 2821O
Owner Name Mailing Address
6CO E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Yc REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6CO E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
}�anl POLARIS 3C
Tutorials Quick Tips. Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel ID GIs ID
21309133 21309133
Address located on Prove" (Postal. Cit-]
NA
Owner Name Malting Address
600 E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Ye REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28302
s� POLARIS 3G
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues More Map Apps
Parcel Id GIs ID
31309130 21309130
Address located on Property (Postal City)
116 OLD BELL RD CHARLOTTE NC 28270
Owner Name Makinq Address
6O4 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY CHARLOTTE NC 28202
96 REAL ESTATE /FINANCE 6O4 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
DEPT CHARLOTTE NC 28202
rnf%).'
TutorialsTips Report Issues More ! !!
Searrh Results LayersJLabets Property Report Zoo -09 M17
Parcel ID
GIs ID
31309131
21304131
Address located on Property
(Postal City)
110 OLD BELL RD CHARLOTTE
NC 38210
Owner Name
Mailing Address
SCO E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CHARLOTTE INC 28202
N REAL ESTATE /FINANCE
6CO E 4TH 5T 11TH FLOOR
DEPT
CHARLOTTE INC 28202
Parcel Ownership, Source: Mecklenburg County Polaris 3G GIS

Source: USGS 7.5 minute quads, Charlotte East, NC
McAlpine Greenway
Providence -Sardis Connector Scale: 1"=1/2 mile
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH Vicinity Map

McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Source: USGS 7.5 minute quads, Charlotte East, NC
Scale: 1"=2000'
NORTH Project Location

%.►-
� MkB
CuD
WkD
mo
CuD
WkE
CeB2 Sika
r
m
CuB� WkE
WkD
CeD2 h
c�
WkB
CeD2 0
a
coo 60�2 w C
WuD
dVIkB CuB CeD2 Mo
WkE
MeB
WkE
,eD2 m CeD2 Mks
CeB2 N`'
��(" Cel
ID kD
WkD
WkE
CeD2 CeD2
G
WkD CeB2 CeB2;
CeB2.
McE3
CeB2 WV kB.
1 470 000 FEET CeB WkE WkE
Source: USDA-NRCS Soil Survey Mecklenburg County, NC Sheet 7 (1980)
McAlpine Greenway Scale: 1"=1000'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH USDA-NRCS Soil Survey

Source: USFWS 7.5 minte Charlotte East quad, National Wetlands Inventory
McAlpine Greenway Scale: 1"=1000'
Mecklenburg County, NC NORTH National Wetlands Inventory

RMSARDIS-131
RM MICA -16
ZON rs X yy 612NE
'� q RE) v 4
�47 � �TC� � . ZONA AF ;
G p JFUTUFOEI ;s .
!1 ZONE X
571 + EkSTINGANQ FIITUR
'bz) S 9 1 WM-USE
NEONS`
Sf i fes,] FLOOD ID RGE 4>�j 90
r
f �!
ZONEAE ` CONTAINED IN R`
+ C C1IWERT+BRIO{3E
cr
a Q °! D
4 .F` ZONE X L7
CI 3 ` coma TIONS ICT URI. -
orf ZONE AE FLooa CiSCmAROR cap
IN GULVERTiERIO13E
w iJ
dr
p L7
iANCFU-'RELUM-USE "-=� :: eQ O
)N S 1 % ANN UAL CHANCE ' �'�``• .i ' —_ C1
ISCHARGE CANTAINE6- r .
Lo
:xrrBRIOGE r { ZONE ZONE X 4 } 0�a
S ca Q AE ;Fv7uR4F
a
-10 �I� ZONEC C]I y#y r` r ..f[ ;.
567 ( f
\r, GRID NORTH}
I i{ MAP SCALE 7" = 500' (1 ; 6,000}
ro
ti€' xs>E u xw soa iso tm>
ca l C7t7 `'ya1 y} ZONE X
ZJ
Flood Insurance Rate Map, Panels 4560 & 457K
Source: Flood Emergency Mangement Agency (FEMA)

Name
Description
Maple Tree Branch
From source to Rockhouse Creek
Marks Mountain Branch
From source to Gragg Prong
Martin Branch
iFrom source to North Fork Catawba River
Index Number
11-38-34-11-4-2
11-38-34-11-3-5
Catawba River Basin
Classification Class Date
Special Designation
C;Tr,ORW 03/01/89
C;Tr,ORW
11-24-11 C;Tr
03/01/89
03/01/62
Marvin Branch
11-138-3-4
C
03/01/62
From source to Sixmile Creek
Mauney Creek
11-129-15-5
WS -IV
08/03/92
'From source to Hoyle Creek
Maynard Lake
11-137-4-3
C
09/01/74
Entire lake and connecting stream to Coffey Creek
1
McAlpine Creek (Waverly Lake)
11-137-9
C
09/01/74
From source to North Carolina -South Carolina State Line
McBride Branch
11-138-3-3
C
03/01/62
(From source to Sixmile Creek
J
McClure Branch
11-119-1-11
C
03/01/62
From source to Leepers Creek
McCrary Creek
11-91
WS-IV,B;CA
08/03/92
From source to Lake Norman, Catawba River
McCullough Branch
11-137-7
C
09/01/74
mom source to Sugar Creek
McDowell Creek
11-115-(5)
WS-IV;CA
08/03/92
From a point 0.7 mile upstream of mouth to Mountain Island Lake, Catawba River
McDowell Creek
11-115-(1)
C
09/01/74
From source to U.S. Hwy. 21
F
McDowell Creek
11-115-(1.5)
WS -IV
08/03/92
From U.S. Hwy. 21 to a point 0.7 mile upstream of mouth
McGalliard Creek
11-44-(0.5)
WS -IV
08/03/92
From source to a point 0.6 mile upstream of mouth
McGalliard Creek
11-44-(3)
WS-IV;CA
08/03/92
(From a point 0.6 mile upstream of mouth to Rhodhiss Lake, Catawba River
Thursday, February 09, 2012 Based on Classifications as of 20120208 Page 38 of 61

.0
dun -20, 2015._
VN
hN
lo�
(100
41 04
Jun 21 iy
IL
NI

Aquatic resource(s) in project area which
"may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in
this document are subject to verification by the
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
fAE
, f f
Sheet L4.7
Total Study Area ±7.0 acres
Potentially Jurisdictional Areas within Study Area
Perennial Stream ±5,2721f
Seasonal Intermittent RPW Stream ±2901f
Non-RPW Intermittent Stream ±60
Wetland ±0.22 acres
i
� I ,
fri P-17
r
Upland ` J
DP -11
Upland
DP -12
Non -Wetland
Waters
2601f
9
DP -15 & 16 –
Wetland
0.22 acre
DP -7
Non -Wetland
Waters
1001f —
DP -14
Non -Wetly
Waters
301f
rte
Sheet L4
—bP-8 { 1 DP -6
Uplaf> d �Upland rt
} r , P-13
DP -10 Upland f
I ., , Upl
� l
-- .-
1
k t MU -
Sheet L4.3 1
Sheet L4.4IWI k.
1
�r
:T
- r
Preliminary JD Map
of Wetlands and Waters
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology
and Subsequent Guidance)
Determination Prepared By (Agent):
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
1
!;==FA D AJrRN Tr
L4.2 Sheet 4.l
4 i AD[) ALTrRNATE # DP -5 DP -2
f Upland / DP -3 Upland
heet L4.8_ VI W Non -Wetland
! Waters
DP -9
� {f' 601f
DP -9A Upland
Upland
DP -18 Upland
1 inch = 400'
rl¢r,+ram role
Tf
Meekleaburg County
Fark and Recrenkion
FROJEcr•
McALPINE
CREEK OREENWAY
WDLE ROAD TO PROMDENCE ROAD
worth & nm4t*s
u�o�Fx ur�rs Iwo u.a xis
VARY -4.1R Ah ]V
�IOLYL 16 illJf
AY �.�Wcu�m�ro
l
h LDR3 wM 1w
. eh _ 2001t.
INWI
_ CA+
�`I� 1
N� �. N4� uca I)N
�IiI�II�I
DRARN W. Dam
CH&SM erg
SCUB
r�nw
DAM
3EMSM
xis n� �noe� m
MEW ffm
LAY=
OPV ERA LL
L3.0
Rom M,

w .�. DP -1 xF4p. Rap A
I � r McAlpine Creek x
McAlpine Creek Perennial x rr Calvert wpr
LP
�I
SSW 3I rrpq L, _��`� r r las � Y# - 7c - - - xQ � a
J _ - r L A
- Y l 3Sl _. _ �yTy Cry;-. .•j{�'�'+
-- -L..- lJl ✓ 9� I , -'
�,- - _M1Ati�rl ` �� x ��•— Itlk 7�f,aFr � �- r
llRsd E+Ar'Fruro dap[. —s ..� - l -- V�GZ1i1Yil•�, ��� - - 1� „ - -' I�' 3'4 S� r � �
�ii r', 1v'
••'''jfj'�� • }5Y /} - -- --7L3- �- '- Ilf �a J' I 5 r 1
- - _ "sem, _ .,I..G �- _ I-~ MH --1
R - 4 r
- MHS. 7R�
-
_
-T-JA
+I }
s
",._. _ -J / I MxaT�Gn,a1°.�DPi
r l+aai c %R—I &bgL. A=
Ql� U land
enr�Tae Qa+E Tan Edi 213-091-29 7' M1
_ i �'r'�aeeH!'la�'g COVtCY%W rlMlerbvg Cc"ney Ma
164ME�b+tEped 1 �? � Rei 6lahe l� QBE � # R� 6k3e l��TrrA O -E
�..._.-._._ 'k.. Tri 411 2 1 3 09 1 x''►'-'--� r J � "�.
a a.aS a .. t� \ ky,� 7zF1d� I 931 A'1J
r .■ Ta, Id1� 1.94 �
Jo -r L 0? �....... �. '+. 5 } 1 r r�+ I I rrai Cdhrat + r� �
,I r>, YdF 213-091- J�. 1 r r x '.y
711
'#
or
[r'P'r 1 1r. .a�ii' II f f 4F' r Y 9• C I, Iryv'', ti.
'� rf r� IrIJI � R mMyh r .. ..._-�� r � �1 rf f 6 + 96 Fray CeSY�! +� �'T '•.
l. 1,'i',,i,x., - - +�.a.,„. ...•- ....3an fid/ 21 f ' .+ i 1 "~�`
I -
J' r+ 4 -- f l r ••N• F
rkm
00,
Preliminary JD Map•-
1LIPi
of Wetlands and Waters,
_ ♦ MJTURV)
.�
U.S. Array Corps 1987 Methodology
and Subsequent Guidance)
Determination Prepared BY (Agent): -----
1� _ T-Idf.211ao91
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163.''
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone] R r
[e-mail] COMMUNITY P DPtAIN ARFA , '�. � '` 4
`T -MA FLOOdWAYPNIGROAr-YIMENT AREA Aquatic resource(s) in project area which 5. HC
COMM LJNITY ENCROAC� kMENT AREA
FEMA �L PLAIN may be” subject to regulatory jurisdiction. ` 1
sl-�r Nbl�a� — `
,_ omwE'runra cirw e&mmm_rauGccoeel_nnrrrtr_rreriare_ COM MLJNITY PLOO PLAN AREA Y � _ 1
2.SESFEETISus- L47 FOR Jf]a nONJL L%YOrr MEAELMrs I
9;4[SF[[75 rcrt GRJDING kt Jfi LIR5 ImA7'FlGroTr[ SnR,W IRSI6 RAnaJ Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in
y
�T RJLIIQ Y8112
r.r�Ts�,T
this document are subject to verification by the
� �- --
==
TXAT,!0,0ru SPEU !rM7TI!MNN LADM 7lP0,57PaLe
M°0N"°"''�TMT°"'"°0°�"*e"° 1
6RGr1GmO`A 6�OTlP Q [41P pKY1p A RAL �4 [Oli'TCIC 6Cr Or [ALU.C119
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
wmulR,.� ns me nx.osnw o. �e n.oa W mnn I�arnrc ne ni.�
JVD m1.l1lr!'Jlr prRNBJYD• Cl41GYG rl WLLCO •A AT XS CAN I¢T*Ir
q
�
MCi'v17ViCTOR'�96151CiYPrE7 Br MCLxrlr,MCnMiPrG'rbRWLLrY u+; '
�
rtlt Au nON4 dl•tlhS20 N M X ti'PEYri,TCM. u� bBCtlr.
Tf
Jr a.....
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
FAWECr
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
$ARC{$ ROAD TQ PWCMDENC-E ROAD
W
wwilh & Amoociaattrea
�
Nam
V]
I rill .80R
NST• R£aQM15; CJION
[FAWN ED
1 >
SCUB �
rATD
REvznm
10 nm 111�
SHE9r rm-P
GRADM YL Q(
ffm area
L4.1
Mt=1ri0w

F. ,----'--' -----rt-------------'�---
.. ,n
r
f
d
Rail
�it7G JM rLr5rle Od .
Ttl Jr# 21 3.061 f I7
f,f
4
�f
0
------
_ ----_-RM-3AN T
CUT-A¢.S^IKVPWFM
MH -3A ti
I
'ti f
\5
Gdfk:14 k
� Rr� @nay JRIaL,ta OdpE
+ IIal Idi a f3.a91 .18
r
J
l
f
}
.ate-��Ya F _•
a62--
'iLLCi9
land
kM
II �
kill .r
r � .rr �•
rr
rr-
r�
rr
u
� u
m h
RET
LU
2I
� e I
6- McAlpine Creek
t
r -
r
c7co� AN4 Imo {
J4_ ad
re Iwo 2 18-wfig
x
i � -
v
IISL�-Zrlo� AM
i rx rlr�oGo »T yyy���r- ax 3-W 1,23 {
5f
w
~_ SOI -
Preliminary JD Map
of Wetlands and Waters
IT
I
� I
I
� I
Aquatic resource(s) in project area which
"may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in
this document are subject to verification by the
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology
and Subsequent Guidance)g
Determination Prepared By (Agent):
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
5MFFr NorM
9229X2TG-OrVRw4R9.aC9VYM+'R='.,ars. LCGI.P
Rt SIULIF4-3.L4.TfR ULQiTio& lAyOU Ri
5 9229rtf`5 RTRiAArwM9UGY9igLATVPTUT}t5W,kWrd9
TpYanp,
_j kvcfdL
d5T PFrGTICY FvnuC
If A UHTRACTM W AM R CMR0 7f DAWIS7f9 PUN} AND 9RMIM MIONN
lI4P K PV r EN R10RfARi nppY.i M WIM�'4 A1RtP�G7 PdTA0.11T]1[ IT LN.L Q
1 TK �ore r�.nr moerlw 1u� aeoc�uv.,e« nw.a tun
seorr� An WS
rs Gm our 1Tr x noxa mY.kg R xT o• Trt! A uls-
V A rCDKfL TOR CIF xrr AND SI C 1CAT R1ve WILLwffr:5 :5 AT % "RIS
I •o a>An><�e 5Cf CI RiAC WI BCIICATICN3l! Nu D6 56 AT IL's CNH JA r
I 4:NIR4.'I PM3 BIS B A0.87� 9r TI! PL " T_ TPEW, OL71IIdlCTCk WILL BE IJIBL!
n7' �R44A7 IiR4�i41N n'C r'IN4a-4TGn{aq`� IW +YAP.
PURMW FIM.
f
J6
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
SARDIS ROAD 74 PROVIDENCE ROAD
ft1P1'Yf\rJJ BY
.uL & Ausuciatax
a:,� � atial ar. au
# 13o7PII GO
I rich .501k.
��SmILYIIYIIhIr�
h
NQT CANS TION
= s =
IFr-
t
CRS H1 ECi
93UB r6"
DATID MR39
RIDTIMS
10 DIM 1� Im
�T TrnD
GRADING PLAN
51mr real
L4.2
mom 11X1r

t+rJ + ' • • • w LU
2 LU
� • � .a -- •o-' T
LU
n UJ
f
4 ----"
"X
____-__--r-= f
0 LP
m
Ta
C�
Mc reek
_ 4
Ian J
f-�� "` �"' '—
n24a 1� R �Q� k� ` �►'y -a te. �a "-'^� _a_a1" - 'N
� RM5675�' � 5`
;L
� �,�1reT•
DP
14
– "
.r
ADT -9A
V
�..� p nd Akddert��F,urYby Ard �4.I E s Ckp[
�—.- 1
_ yruIe121-"N-IS Ts.�a121S I- 1
,, Ms:kkr>ar9 Gw�.= MedJer{�uy Carty 1 T. 213
'•. lukdcle 4eenxry EivTle �"�' �'4 +T6'ee+,.s,rCsesT,er•rt �.J� � - + ,l
r ar��Lee
�y y- A y
j —} Y �I�Of�I � il'1lY�i
R�cf 9ra�iord Lee Tagil W2 I - 8
Rcgai EKOi d Lee AM PMoron
abw. " iaa IdJ 2 1 �-(1191-1 4 f
Jw Pat, -;o M;.,w Ts, 14 213 -WI 12 �
1 1 ! 5 4P
Preliminary JD Map
of Wetlands and Waters �..
"
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology '
Aquatic resource(s) in project area which and Subsequent Guidance)
"ma be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction. Determination Prepared By (Agent):
ti y g Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design 1
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in Post Office Box 163 �.LU
this document are subject to verification by the High Shoals NC 28077 .g W
ti } U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources. Phone: [phone] I. }
[e-mail]
1 / n
�— - 1
����
J W is -�— - 1 •± '... . d
2 ---
V*W* I _ __ r I. 5ee"9rwA ICK#WR,-,-OTM 20-W, woe 5UW-kr. wrU L019-0 u1 rE AA GR05SSEC OH � * - asx s1Cneu.44A241A4- u_T r9R IWITIOM LATCUTPACASAar.
w
otr&o roRr,�arrG raereul� auTeo mrrr an¢rra I¢araralvrarr
LVDRY-
w -
I+.S � 1+ 1 � ,r'�� � - -_ M4T ri PP YC! f•11L711Y r'I�ra ll-! mlM1- /!!RG@m CISl11S11GIG IT lVLL CZ
yi MmAWi ClSSmI�VLISOi 1[l�6^ 0bDm RIXMOtf
` r +' �` �rcnaexE1unaePCRTrNrrt.It..�,.r�orMANR4 CO Mn-s..Urrs_
V T ■ 1 _ } f i rACOMIOIC S Bog m POM 9RC CAT PWM} MLLV>�>ATr-07K ul
Ir0 a7MtCre ger Cr RL ADX Vfff TM
r! M W 9P AT � Gkk RH14 r
Trs 40MRt�CRS d41&+{±L FL T'n'R—TETT; GO`+R`t�ORutL4 !'E LI+S4E
I'OIS JLL XV"L � N 11! Fl1M.'JlLQ1G1GY8. l4JJ /DOlFCA
PRfPARID FM
V
!k
Mecklenburg Ccmaty
Park and Recreation
PRUCT,
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
$ARCtS ROAD 10 PRCMDR4CE RM
PRMkMM W,
w.th & Associates
ere�.r r -
a..e
+ M dC
P ,5
�,,�+ MIl+lryuh
�
4� F'� • �j''ti' S
} P��NRU�TIGH
DRAWN Hi x31
CHKSM my- RM
8CAW r6"-
EKED
6 cEKED
amm
M MUR
RREEr IMID
GRADM PLAN
L4.3
PST 1 '�'

w��4. } I � + f rr II..I
I� -* ,{ J L
w
Id
-- - - - ------a -----it
■
�q
19
1
._. 1 ��•
Mcine Creek
+ r l ay77p ! Alp_
' "" �-
l � ~ \ � _���-�-�-fir• - � � "��I�'�-�— f ate. r+. ��"'�`
f ^�+{�. � ~� �-frn17Y •• y!' r �,���n 5�4E �F '�A'a ���,. ��`^"��
•I •
N.
1
'
MH-5� 7-.
1 DP 0
UPI d . Cs ana p .' � �
ry ' Me r}ivg corn, �A.l r
Ard %Rd! Md Ji- P.pE
A 16 R.W rkrt
x.4563721
� , y ,
DP -14 1
r "'� SeasonalInterm' ent
GN
RPW PreliminaryJD Ma
P
FEMA FLOOD PNC1 R0-kn#1t - � 3
hMENIT Ar A of Wetlands and Waters
"eaft4w"ft"�" " ` (U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology
Aquatic resource(s) in project area which and Subsequent Guidance)
}•: LG �� Determination Prepared By (Agent):
#., may be subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
+. Craig R. Wyant RLA
w I •`• % \,bA Fine Line Design
A. Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in Post office Box 163
A" this document are subject to verification by the High Shoals NC 28077
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources. Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
U-1 y` + •�
fit•$ �,� '�'. }may � wR I sHwTCIJOTE.S:areRKNa+eaaaMNcoxesuwµw.�rr�ecera
3-.@d2 omL. us NR GRON4 menup® R[WING�TO THE 9fRVM R@TawoN
ATCF1 UNC i x ............ ...... } l
5RITT L4.8 t L MATCH LINE aeeT w cnre Mao-
__ IF A ORIIMlGTC7t N& ",E
R 0.311RIVCf WL ,"O"3
ffL119 iV0 9PlCrIiYVT101@P
5> 5 F1>T L4.8 MT K pa Rau wMTo er w ua aaamime ruauoxu ee
l '+ 4 r I5mMRIlIGI{ m6 NM ro[1GN a TFIX nlla wTRLII! R�L1G TK n..
n d. 4b 1 {{ x'4 1 1 w w� f�MiCf2 Mq fe RwOC uO 9 El TM aW . TM O NFR wT R Own UM r
. TI! C9HBMlT?P3 BIP IB VIXIPf@ � TI! 0.ZMT- TI! 001lWu'I9R4XLLB! U1Bl!
r0'+lL �Rl[ � N Tf1G I'y1Y�y 6RP+GAT +�+IERIO4
`iYEMM
Tf
Mecklenburg County
��Paar�rkand Recreation
PRDIECr
WALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
SARDIS ROAD TO PROVIDENCE ROAD
PRMUM Br-
Wirth k l�saociates
u.cea.Y t�.ess ..v I«o .rrve,s
P IIN491H �
tY �
Nci F o*N T GTP
ILI
CHRCM W iK
SCUD r6" -
nM
INNUO
RREgr TIIILD
GRADM RM
�r Mal
L4.4
PAr N0:

Aquatic resource(s) in project area which
"may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in
this document are subject to verification by the
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources
'* Ass'%LU
•
�% i rr J
y 4
LU
LU
* i
• % iv
1
lk
rrt ~4- y • � ey �4 �
k
4 l
�a._
58 kN. }
151 + ,
,.t ^ �1�
sent � � `�.� w � � y' 1 � •�._____
10
i` t Q-
1^
�� `•: � �A}tl Roll L�Se PLrurlpeDe�e • � l'°a � , 2� �'�, .ems } t� 1 � . �• r
S
1�.ti `l ^•"4� 4 ' r ate.``'
ov-. ya l p7
Kau 4
a
IW
ZONF
V.
�.
Axe DP -8
t, • pland a
DP 7 —
��" Per nnial
R� RP
�1001f
'tip w
k
'17411F 27A /701rt1
`�. wrlx: 7ib?T
i
I' A o %k9pii ems* - G.o
Pb. 49GS-721
4 I11 r. 1de2i aas1-06
I
L
4 ° 4
I .
Preliminary JD Map
of Wetlands and Waters
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology
and Subsequent Guidance)
Determination Prepared By (Agent):
* Craig R. Wyant RLA
'\ A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
w
10
Ilk
5FEFT NME2:
1�
LU It
+- xesnxruarclEcea&kL- ns.2010*CcaswMkIV.r+rLearo-
z
s_ sx sneers u_ 1-u.+ 1W.1; - u.z rort bPnorrx uavur Me �uas
J
Ll
a see81Le79T. nae GkRDNG hlrftJR@RLRTHG P7 T1[STRrfrI�TOICA7IOH
d
W
Bd�T PPJLTIlHJ Lt
U 2
arSIR4 Px
ca9—KW
vva•w skIT-Lt
ITMkCEI
G-1
F%•W AJT
`+R RAP�6C rl M 40 U+ n'6+u11ry793O P6�L11R71ci rt u�4 OS
LLJ
1 m�ll�llTGl{v R� Q,N1[} Sl .— 111 bAM1 111 rro
K
111.11.r�
PACCNTraetW•ryaeBaaadCVDi.rt.R�,vomrrlenxror TVA,
Ir C317PJGTtlST POSP2 Crn!x Ptwb MS MFM
D Or A
uo a�rlen xr a aura xa ere rlcKnae� re vna COar 9o�r na Pox it
WILL 0A
I
n'C ppWlgLTom m Ip K[p9c{] pIM WIMY M jownscw Muco 11 Am
rQ lYL -% �a�o NM—, --,—/CO—
PRUhm FM
Tf
96�
9 436,,,
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
PADIBM
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
$ARE1{$ ROAD TQ PRCMDENOE ROAD
PRBPAR�I BY�
.Wirth & Aasociates
vx.e x+...e x rw ru
s..... .wl
l�WJ41II
Q ja 2G #
1 .I{L -80 N,
Nr
= Na t•7 r$--
"v' nun
DRAWN ED �[
CHRC m Br. Edi
SCAM
rKTJD
REVARM
ID nAm 110M» W
SRWP TIIIE
aUDW PLAN
of Mal
L4.5
P&MWr 1+R'k

Preliminary JD Map ONr a
�F Aquatic resource(s) in project area which.11
of Wetlands and Watersi
A t "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction. LII
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology '` �_.,_....•
and Subsequent Guidance) _ Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in In
this document are subject to verification by the
I Determination Prepared By (Agent): j U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
Craig R. Wyant RLA e x
A Fine Line Design I Cbr �- -.
Post Office Box 163 ti __-'r--xtra.►."•"ter �.-y,._•_•__,_•,.,.,..,.,�.;
�P — High Shoals NC 280771•�"'"�--.� �" �w-, _4_=,_,_,
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail] 1 i X .Mrd ..r µ r r•' f
`... ... . .� � �� -.w-- arr -�� ��•
tc
cm
I
ine Creek
1VIc Alp
DP -12 Inv.npb ygar•y3.7p
I c+7a In—t-64a.aQ {
IS Non -Wetland �I� �f� �
Waters
x a s Ma C E JC 2601f — [%
II 6 % �`.�J..* a••,z r• • `` s��" -✓a d
DP -17 f r } T •� — "�.i cC �• ir� F \ � s J A '.
43 t
� .�.�-� Upland'' — --�•� +�
VJ
x — SDP- `'_'"'�__`
FEMA fLOCO 11KCA ,WENT AREA
000 KADNITY PNVROACHMENT AREk
I rr-MA 1ffL00DPLAP4
C0VrMVNfrAFL0001-L1UN AF P.
uaTa2n.fa lnr •A'f10i1]Vldl
Grlk lww�x M,v 8,11k 1MY,C8Rx
4 1
I
�1
I
YgIG131 d0!l06f
COLE GI YNi.
1Z11A C%155 £GTION
A
54?rT NOTf5
I 2. v i!ORfl G7F`i L- Y lrQKmpa -um% L- vvroc, G
u-
5- IZ[BMIrT IOROh9HFt7N_PIDR12.ATNG0TM[unlfNFtL6L1COWt411
CN
Ir A[LlrTMUCTGtnABA±erer [enwti o[+awalis �nlrt luo ireerlumdla
TIi4 K D6 XQI Rlph--! I'IpM 4! OSXT15 /1Rl0Yi�p-���Q IT W l� R
T•! OOn}IOT00.'sAY714n!llrtT TO ORM 1ufLEdLY.TIY72 NndMW
I!'EDTRTI016 �191.1� EG 91G OfI V I3 AM4 R10 mNIGI! �G! Q CyIdVCF3-
I[A WITIHQO0.EC4 R!Y!'914T17M0[7l�RC lS•M64NTr}l+ RPGP�NG TM RriL
TIC aL'TlxR-PaRIo-wQo-Fll0 KcnW10Sc 17,drTTIC "Ir •�TL TC
ITTRR.W3RI {L R9LI.
EF u+4•i
RRNL W]IR nxllcm M >s n.IM� SSltiFI�• IXP,�CEI0.
FRWAIM Ia�
Tr
Z A—
.7-&
ideakknburig Co,=T
Park and Recreation
elremcr•
CALPINE
CREEK GREEN WAY
5ARM Rano M PR04i1B•JCF Rona
PFUMUM Will
Ith & Aracciakee
u.aouc uxoms .ur us n.w�c
+cw r rrr.. u sw av
o.y. 'r Baa
F F
3 t ! r
rl„Ila�
MAW BIC B[7[
C 91f! ev[
SCAM
n%TB MX=
REVIEND
W 2W W
RM TM
GRADW PL W
R "i L4.6
"Mm m'

Aquatic resource(s) in project area which f r, 'F Preliminary JD MapLU
f of Wetlands and Waters s
may be subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
LU
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology w
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, orjurisdictional in `� �f • and Subsequent Guidance)
this document are subject to verification by the•
U.S. Army Corps & North Carolina Division of Water Resources. . —w t Determination Prepared By (Agent):
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
`- - •'�- - "•� ; �.� - High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone] $
•�,.�-"
[e-mail] ....,. •,
k} •N• d • �
- •�•�M 5 ..J� Y
4 r ` - i.z •.
*}JX 7}%790@7 ,�s�••,.,.e• ,yW� { + � w..
ay,2 +r r a w
IWCkrr.5 7j ---3"�+ '�`�•
IXV gIf1572- -----
-------
k ----- �r
...__ r
Y, 1�
99ur. >•30 rfLGEQ
_.--_•__,-•- -�.."3.-_ ---
14,
KIpTT: ff9D.As' 1 ffifir�7 '_._ f� t '�•�.--
fes- ' *'-• -�- , r
Trac CaNrerf� • � _
�A1l
�Oq "!f f tri r _-- _ Sr{ w_ �ti•`` �.� 1 lne lir
lle�I, esvneax�axrs _ �• - *•.�',fffr �Y,.- _ ---- ,�. �, . �, , , • �' � e
Wx5'A.EE' r l+ }: � - � _ r�` �xe�::aeilw • k� . �
W.
I W OUT. 59.0.3' f l�' '' r / • � � ---. - 4 1 , r� �a��v¢ * � � � 1 �.
chi , r _ ~ 1',� ry / • _ k " ;' ti Y -*a& x Trac CL r&t
.,fid r � � .! {�` � - _ h , � -� r•�-�„y x �\ti14 - Y �
I je , , , , �','•' .. '-�-�; ." .�.. 5. �"��TJJ�`�1.. l• +._'iia _ - _-'1��=��- ..� r
l �rF '�, /• l aQ. ff f ' J f l x 4 •�5. 4 ri'. . J Y�•..�. �� r{~a ~a ~ -_ may_ _
�_l6AffYfFWEe
AN iGi a7 r ( �^MYr. : _• r �4�
r/, F rf✓` } W +•�a. � �e _ 3Y5
41 � �� '+�' r F .,4°"� 'fI �{� r� - ��_ '�: . . '•*' ' -�! � t—. �I +.��� K—r ,�. 24q,��
y 1 1 J'r' • f g6. r r- -v -
1 I Jrrr ,R*
' F rlfi Ra anR f f ,•f. ,�F r C {}'��+�} .,,\\� � �.
f 1+rrjft{r7+� � rr ! J ! r fteJitl�aRTnfi�s as�.-_r.... �X► � .J �. � .F--, ..
Tr S I � f/ /
/ I
r .'r{ f,'%f; �. --- ,,•• r 1 ,���� .o ``��•-- Itil11 y4S.ti i ,..J�.
� • r M,(1 4 1 !I� orns+aAP llydrila +� �� � --� .iV- yy 5'I} S � ��-
.ma :lace . Fi�MR FLOOarhICROACHM AREA— J Dl ch in yy'
f 4 1 creaRglM9uoRnuaxeass 7 ! S
f! a' •{ r l! Comm UNITYPNCR�ACHNT�iARfA - Upland
[[ FEMA FLOODFLAJN
_/ ♦ COMMUNITY FLOODFLAIN ARFA f rRAPaI�iIIF f `+
f.' I FEMA CRo56 ECTToN
f r'
ISL
e
seTUJlaaal l4 �(w y y
Iky,ripRB
PREMM
r k
TF �4....
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
MELT
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
$ARD{$ ROAD 70 PROMDENOE ROAD
PRMUM W
Mwirth & Amcciat x
JMhF �„I ,r
NOM
rXo. 5er�ss-ror r. =.-
m
555ji1j511411IJllh,+
Nof CONST CIDN
�'Irc�lunun+"`
DRAWN HY.
&3[
1++ Ll• )
9.l1M
DATID Q�
REVEKM
ID ERNIMIIi W
�r T=
GRADM PLAN
�t MW
L4.7
PACam W
PYlG R WINdIGXI
U -J
W
f
2ILJ
W
d7
�HP1=7 NIOI"E5�
I_ 3[ 4LCR.In I.OR O[ILRJL NCVS, 2011M =E 31MXJRY, AND I ersNO.
S 90.'9H99T9 6A-1- Nro"r{lprnpA% LAYMTN9R$JI09-
3-529!Q'S AORGRJnW- WORK REATNr T10 nE 4FU!AM Rr5n7RLn CN
WGM
QAT rk?t1 Cc Nan=
mmy.��o5 rua a xr rr mJn4'� oo¢w,en5 4L+ra wa �exnu5oen)
TMST CIO 7X IT xiL BC
JLLlII'CJVJ� C959
5 kl,6
rIY mmR.c�cn Rcavelerm To09TNn RUNVE�VL n•eee A..e as
O S Rd5P , 0Lf Offl—
} 14aT4NCJ O
COHI
iR)sAPl�LINV
OM1NB+4I!�
cf R
cO,:O,KI./MTCYTM FLLL
r+IBT Pc+JK{TI
+
TgGLA5YTRl75Rff4N
l6iB
{AT iar P
&R°C
P9.p9uw W5 r
TIL SNIRalGlO DP IS lII'2E1@ Qr TIL �.rAY. TIL mlYlpalG[4ALLS IJldG
RGR RLL,4rJO4 R'� N M O•CaTaB� Ar] RLLLNIh
PREMM
r k
TF �4....
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
MELT
McALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
$ARD{$ ROAD 70 PROMDENOE ROAD
PRMUM W
Mwirth & Amcciat x
JMhF �„I ,r
NOM
rXo. 5er�ss-ror r. =.-
m
555ji1j511411IJllh,+
Nof CONST CIDN
�'Irc�lunun+"`
DRAWN HY.
&3[
1++ Ll• )
9.l1M
DATID Q�
REVEKM
ID ERNIMIIi W
�r T=
GRADM PLAN
�t MW
L4.7
PACam W

6
Preliminary JD Map
of Wetlands and Waters
(U.S. Army Corps 1987 Methodology
and Subsequent Guidance)
Determination Prepared By (Agent):
Craig R. Wyant RLA
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
5FF5IUT14.4 i—
A
IP I
4 9
4
4
Fy � ''
7.74
i MATCH LINA
5€€ SHEET L4.4
k�
h4a iueeao-�-.�ea.y And R Red E.Eellrunoe Bei.
WWWCwt
R " Arid% Red Ed.0 A-0.0 Ti, IM215-091-10
Axa �r � Tfa 10215 1-09
Tai kW 1 3-091 -06
x
5'S 5�,-aie,��d..o� hAn1iFl
Ad =tx hJIZ
k ria 1�213as1 -07
•�
lD +........... land .............-
OY�,cP 1,11 e.4em4C�1 4 Cr•• •.�•
y 1 ...qM.....
....
%o.i.•x� 'c.,i�" n. r 1 —556 73
557.20
� I
------------ - --
,T Y
IL
f xx Wrn_565.�a ,.• Iz'r r f r i {�r� E—E. N%rw
1 Irrr.n-•S•Ja,1 C _ r r rf r'
5 1nr.OA-sw. 12I r rr And N7r�er;s hkt'a5
,d1t �x r-�* J •' f� r { r /fr r� Tia ldI213-091-0.f
}■ 5x - i l! ! f l f J r r r
FEMA FLOOD €NCROACMMCNT ARFA
Inr.0 G-5 47 ' frr +� COMMUNITY ENCROAC HN&HT AREA
t I P i 1 • P7 -MA FLOODPl-AIN
i 1I
I 1 I r COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN AREA
x5 l 1
Di 5
y 5x - oo It Hama 5 11 k 1 11+ 1
I ry 566.'7 r AM T—W Hare
Inc.+�7a Qs] -%a3 x ob. 2209E571
Irx.r,►7575r 560.a& I Tia l�f/21 &091 -06
' Irw.aA�9P?.CF7 ; 1 i 341 Ert,daM1Aoeuri
Y • � 4 + 3 x • l + T Ar,dMr�ee[o M1Ae+'iW
Tan IdI2 -' I-05
11 } � � ,` Z'r `■ I 515k5t5 5 4 ;l �h 111 i;1 � I
� � "4. 14x i 5115; kkytiktii;� y
r
i /
¢kw ` _ `.
r f
r 4 f
• + r" -fl fi f k 1
Aquatic resourceproject area whichx.
q �s) in p J r rf,
may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Note: All areas indicated as wetland, waters, or jurisdictional in
this document are subject to verification by the { ►;�=565,21
i`. rryu[�963A9 iJ s
U.S. Army Corps &North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
PREPAM FM
11
6°1
Mecklenburg County
Park and Recreation
PRDlECn
WALPINE
CREEK GREENWAY
SARgs RoAD70 PROMDENOE ROAD
SAM N
Wmlh & Asaacia#as
l!M'9.FY Yp6TS VP LYA �'L�'r!„S
aY � rk
quA C -A
1,
VON
s
3
DRAWN W. H3[
Cly Mr. H3[
r6]"
rATD nv2u
SEM THLID
cRADM PLM
smw
L4.8
hoouer.T ?n -

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 DP -1 Perennial McAlpine Creek
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1368
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7686
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
I Other
Stream osaileast intermrmnt 44.5
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
Ephemeral Interrnittent erennlal
a -g -Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 21.0 _
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
1
1
2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
2 3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2 3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2 3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 10.5__)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
17.
Organic debris lines or piles
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1 1.5
CGS = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ 13.0 _)
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (nate diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
4. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACVV = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 cpther = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
89
50' Ilk
40'
Channel has been
straighetened and
channelized.

View Looking Upstream at DP -1, McAlpine Creek, Perennial RPW
View Looking Downstream at DP -1, McAlpine Creek, Perennial RPW
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163
Data Point DP -1
McAlpine Creek
• H 9h Shoals • NO • 28077 • [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -2 Ditch In Upland
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1366
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7684
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast irrtermrMnt 8.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
a -g -Quad Name:
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
0 1
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 4_5 )
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
D) 1
2
2
.3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,O
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0 1
0 1
2
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0 0.5
o = 0
1
Yes
1.5
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 1.0 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
a 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
a 0.5
1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
o = -07
Yes = 3
C. Biology (ubtot2l = _ 3.0__)
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
0
2
1
2
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Tther = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch., g
3'
3'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment

View Looking Downstream at DP -2, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -2
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 DP -3 Intermittent Non-RPW
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1362
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7689
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileainterauMnt 20.75
Ephemeral nterrnitien erennial
a -g -Quad Name:
Jf a 19 or mnfuai If $ 30•
S. Active/relict floodplain
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--10-0 _
Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
_ 1 3
1 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
02
2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 2 3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0
1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
o
1 2 3
1 2 3
8. Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley
o 0.5 1 1.5
No = 0 D lies = 3
11. Second or greater order channel
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 6.5 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
o 1 2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0.5 1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
Q0j 0.5 1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ 4.25 _)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
4. Amphibians
25. Algae
o
o
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
18"
V
12'
3'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment
through sewer line.

View Looking Upstream at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
View Looking Downstream at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -3
Mecklenburg County, NC Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

`� ter'' .r'�. • ' f-"�:.'r •.
'•;� ..�,� .•?�- ,.. h .... ": .- - - �? r � ?,gym
;irks'
41
tv
.•� 'e±jy- + ,, tip: ' G
''tea-•, �''�` ..� ,�•��_ �'

View Looking West Across at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
View Looking East Across at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -3
Mecklenburg County, NC Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
� ne�iroe / DESIGN • P.O. Cox 163 0 Hiy6 S6, ,1, 0 NO 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking Downstream at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
View of Bed at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -3
Mecklenburg County, NC Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

View Looking Upstream at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
View Looking Downstream at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -3
Mecklenburg County, NC Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

View of Bed at DP -3, Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -3
Mecklenburg County, NC Non-RPW Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -4 Ditch In Upland
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1351
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7702
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast irrtermrMnt 9.25
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e -g- QuaalName:
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
0 1
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 4_5 )
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
D 1
2
2
.3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0 0.5
60 = 0-D
1
Yes
1.5
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 1.0 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
175 1
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
QIo= 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (ubtot2l = _ 3.75 _)
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
2'
10'
3'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment

View Looking Upstream at DP -4, Ditch in Upland
View Looking Downstream at DP -4, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -4
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking West Across at DP -4, Ditch in Upland
View Looking East Across at DP -4, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -4
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -5 Ditch In U land
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1346
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: _80.7708
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast inferrrtmnt 9.25
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
a -g -Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 4.5
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
D 1
2
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,O
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
d
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 1.0 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14.
Leaf litter
I. 1 0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0.5 1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
00 =75 Yes = 3
C. Biology (ubtot2l = __3_7,5___)
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch., 10,
2'
4'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment

View Looking Upstream at DP -5, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -5
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 Higi Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking West Across at DP -5, Ditch in Upland
View Looking East Across at DP -5, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -5
Ditch in Upland
/ DESIGN • P.C. F- ](33 • H a6 Shoals • NC • 28077 • [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -6 Ditch In Upland
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1346
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7708
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast irrtermrMnt 9.25
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e -g- QuaalName:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 4_5 )
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
0 1
2
2
.3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,O
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0 1
(Z)1
2
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see cliscLissiOns in n711u0l
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ---1 *0----)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1-5 1
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
o = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtot2l = _ 3.0__)
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0._750
B L = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
2'
10,
3'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment

.. .y ..
� �i
`S•' •
_
�Yr'�`•� .tea yfr - ���•f
T .
-..• .'+`�.
'
Pte'
_ .' ^
.. .y ..
� �i
`S•' •
_
�Yr'�`•� .tea yfr - ���•f
T .

View Looking West Across at DP -6, Ditch in Upland
View Looking East Across at DP -6, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -6
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -7 Perennial
Date: March 8, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1307
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7758
Total Points:
Stream Determination lcircie a
Other
rearxarpems ai a ifterrn0k 39.0
�f � f9 Or �f?fNa! If � ,30'
Ephemeral Intermittent erennlal
a -g- Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 21_5}
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 1
0 1
.1
2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 1O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2 3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
0 0.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5 1 1.5
No = 0 es = 3
11. Second or greater order channel
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 10.0__)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No= 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ 7.5__)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1 0
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 1.5
4. Amphibians
25. Algae
0
0
0.5
1 1.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 CIthey =
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
6,
25'
7'
Stream has been restored.
Channelized through sewer
line.
12" flow depth.

View Looking Upstream at DP -7, Perennial RPW
View Looking Downstream at DP -7, Perennial RPW
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163
Data Point DP -7
Perennial RPW
•
Idiqk Shoals • NO • 28077 • [phone]

••ii l�ll��
t=: H:1...
'���: •.7{''"�?'-. n _ ::•rte=
..:?Ca � .. �
'� fir- - - _ ��•
�. y�r '. a..+: �..
A6
'a
'' `-

T

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenwqay Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -8
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35-1306 Long: -80.7760 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Mononcan Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface
Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314) —Sparsely
Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage
Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) —Moss
Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish
Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7) —Saturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted
or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow
Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Area was created by the construction of a berm along a perennial stream as part of a stream restoration
project that temporarilily impounds surface
flow from upstream areas so that it can be redirected around restoration to prevent streamank erosion.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2. Ulmus americana
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 23
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Lonicera japonica
3. So/idago altissima
4. Allium canadense
5. Juncus effusus
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -8
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
30
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
15
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
45
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
_ 20% of total cover:
9
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 50 x 2 = 100
25
Yes
FACU
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 155 (A) 475 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.06
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
25
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover:
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
40
Yes
FAC
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
20
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10
No
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5
No
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover:
16
height.
5
Yes
FAC
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 75 7.5YR 4/4 25 Loamy/Clayey-
3-9 7.5yr 4/4 Loamy/Clayey
9-16 7.5yr 4/6 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -8, Upland
Test Pit at DP -8, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -8
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 h9k Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View
of Vegetation Community at
j:
y
;11 tP
` � +�•"�y � rte: _, 'e!ti • . -
� h6f.�=��.' ^ ��~.. .• - .-
'
.1
ate:• - .�
is
41
.F � M

View of Vegetation Community at DP -8, Upland
View of Vegetation Community at DP -8, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -8
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

now
� r - •yy..r�i,...`_.�. tri' �• � ��•:; '••.Z&e x - ,;K, .�;E• _... �•�?• .F=� 'ef +��'p��;' �� ��
l.f � ��' - Vii' •i. +'� � �. -;� r ir'�' � �� � -
r
1.W.: - :��,•

View of Berm on DP -7 Perennial Stream at DP -8, Upland
View of Berm on DP -7 Perennial Stream at DP -8, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -8
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CSk.,Yi., / DESIGN • P.C. F- ](33 • H a6 Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-15-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -9
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1333 Long: -80.7720 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The vegetation in this area is maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed. Soils have been disturbed in some areas
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
istri Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
_Water Marks (B1) X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
? Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 13
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Sample plot is in the vicinity of an area that had been previously delineated and verified as wetland. This area has since been disturbed by sewer line
construction.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -9
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 75 x 4 = 300
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 415 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vegetation has been removed from sewer line easement and occurs along forested edges only. Sewer line is mowed periodically
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Yes
FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Festuca rubra
25
Yes
FACU
2.
Juncus effusus
20
Yes
FACW
3.
So/idago altissima
15
Yes
FACU
4.
Carex crinita
15
Yes
OBL
5.
Carex lurida
10
No
OBL
6.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -9
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 75 x 4 = 300
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 415 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vegetation has been removed from sewer line easement and occurs along forested edges only. Sewer line is mowed periodically
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 5/2 60 7.5YR 4/4 40 RM M Loamy/Clayey-
6-16 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soils have been disturbed in some areas due to previous sewer line construction.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

:��. c" ^ _' �. `� - ,� ,'�' ;• �? ', •ice 7 F • { � �
' 7wg w.'"

� ,..,fir ,�N •#��'k �_�.�'-+� j..• v:�;C �. �'a�x. _ :���.
;.RW . _., � We.
Mc -A LPWE
DP
.. . .�.-T`L. � � �.1�. •�•' -� illi- ..
��+
�� v.
_ � ice.• '+'g���•�
�';y fir. a
.
..� 1 •.
� �
!e
., ,4 � � ,..
-. r a' ..
.. ,
vi
• �
�
y-r�' .e.X
J �n

View of Vegetation at DP -9, Upland
View of Vegetation at DP -9, Upland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -9
Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View of Vegetation at DP -9, Upland
View of Vegetation at DP -9, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -9
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-15-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -9A
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodpalain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1333 Long: -80.7719 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Area is well drained with no standing water in test pit.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: DP -9A
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 150 x 4 = 600
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 210 (A) 720 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.43
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
60
Yes
FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Ligustrum sinense
90
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
90
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
45 20% of total cover:
18
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Lonicera japonica
60
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: DP -9A
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 150 x 4 = 600
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 210 (A) 720 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.43
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -9A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/3 Loamy/Clayey
3-16 7.5YR 4/6 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -9A, Upland
Test Pit at DP -9A, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -9A
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CSk.,Yi., / DESIGN • P.C. F- ](33 • H a6 Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

1 '•fit +.V`.,:' �� r' - :,�%. k'' , _ Y.. ''t/�
� wr
04
to � � . � ;,a �.i L`'bS . _ • +� + ••� ' % t� `�� �.�. � � .. -: ]. S''
tib:
q__ .
- :,�;.
,,._� � +. ter•..#.„�.. �,q;;-.,.: - * .•,:..,y:4 _;'•.
- . , ._ _
sem.. ��, �,i
_
F.iY
�
.} Y ^ ��.
-
1,•
T-t�tF' :�
•" •.fes. - -.ti�i . - ."
�... -

-•_i:.`�:';3•, — tee• = •e, _ -�;'. -
�. �r �3 � 1 � 1. �1i �' - � •�.
iF A
Allis U
.. ., .
V►�.� �. i r�: � `'i'+i� .. _
:. ate .��;jF�� j��°• -..
,-b�L.y �,._'
R'0.- I�''
�N
i4•_':�y.�.
_�-
.�
�:
f

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-15-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -10
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1312 Long: -80.7743 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Vegegation has been maintained as herbaceous and periodically mowed. Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area
as backfill.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -10
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 130 x 4 = 520
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 160 (A) 600 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot is along edge of maintained sewer easement at forest edge. Easement is mowed periodically
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
25
Yes
FACU
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
45
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Ulmus americana
10
No
FACW
2.
Ligustrum sinense
50
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
2.
Festuca rubra
15
Yes
FACU
3.
So/idago altissima
15
Yes
FACU
4.
Andropogon virginicus
5
No
FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -10
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 130 x 4 = 520
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 160 (A) 600 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot is along edge of maintained sewer easement at forest edge. Easement is mowed periodically
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/3 Loamy/Clayey
2-16 7.5YR 4/6 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -10, Upland
Vegetation atDP-10, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -10
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
/ DESIGN 0 P.C.Cox ]03 0 Hiq6 Shah l'C 2rso77 a (704) l4c-o7,J3

View of Vegetation at DP -10, Upland
View of Vegetation at DP -10, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -10
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View of Vegetation at DP -10, Upland
View of Vegetation at DP -10, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -10
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CSk.,Yi., / DESIGN • P.C. F- ](33 • Hak Skoal: 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
DP -11 Ditch In Upland
Date: March 15, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1286
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: _80.7802
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast intermrmnt 8.5
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e -g- QuaalName:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 4.5
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
0 1
2
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
d
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
2
3
9. Grade control
0 0.5)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
1
1.5
1-1 second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 1.0 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14.
Leaf litter
IT 1 0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0.5 1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
00 = C)D IYes = 3
C. Biology {ubtot2l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
y
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 they =
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
39
10,
3'
Trapezoidal cross section
Straight alignment.
Eroded at downstream end.

View Looking Upstream at DP -11, Ditch in Upland
View Looking Downstream at DP -11, Ditch in Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -11
Mecklenburg County, NC Ditch in Upland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 DP -12 Intermittent Seasonal RPW
Date: March 15, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1292
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7793
Total Points:
Stream Deterrnl n circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast intermrmnt 20.25
Ephemeral nterrnittent erennlal
e -g- QuaalName:
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 7.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1
1
2
M 1
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
O.S
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1)1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
lies
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 6.5 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 O.S
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
I co) 0.5
1 1.5
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ 6.25__)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1 0
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1 1.5
25. Algae
0
O.S
1 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACVV = 0.7
O B L = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch.,
1'
16'
3'
Drains out of wetland area.
Appears to be man-made.

View Looking Upstream at DP -12, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking Downstream at DP -12, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -12
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking East Across at DP -12, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking West Across at DP -12, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -12
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

Looking East at Upper Portion of Stream at DP -12, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -12
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent Stream
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -13
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1334 Long: -80.7721 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Sample plot occurs within center of sewer line. Vegetation is maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed. Soils have been disturbed by
sewer line construction. Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Area is well drained.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -13
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 85 x 4 = 340
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 100 (A) 380 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.80
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous vegetation and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca rubra
40
Yes
FACU
2. Solidago altissima
25
Yes
FACU
3. Andropogon virginicus
20
Yes
FACU
4. Juncus effusus
5
No
FACW
5. Carex lurida
5
No
OBL
6. Plantago lanceolata
5
No
UPL
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -13
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 85 x 4 = 340
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 100 (A) 380 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.80
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous vegetation and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 5/3 60 7.5YR 4/4 40 Sandy Soil profile is disturbed
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
? Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -13, Upland
Test Pit at DP -13, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -13
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC. 0 28077 • [phone]

� R'
_ �*�� ..
F,..
.. F �'

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 DP -14 Intermittent Seasonal RPW
Date: March 17, 2018
Project/Site. McAlpine Greenway
Latitude: 35.1307
Evaluator: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.7743
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream osaileast intermrmnt 19.5
Ephemeral qqterrnitten erennial
e -g- QuaalName:
Jf a 19 arpemnfuai If $ 30•
O
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ 7.0 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
S. Active/relict floodplain
0
es = 3
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
1
2
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
lies
= 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual ---------
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 8.0 __)
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16.
Organic debris lines or piles
I 0 0.5 1
1 1.S
17.
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No= 0
es = 3
C. Biology {Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
1
1 0
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.75;
OBL = 1. S ther = 0
perennial streams may also be identltled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch., 5'
1'
2'
Drains out of wetland area.
Appears to be man-made.

View Looking Upstream at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking Downstream at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

. .�_C••-•-� -.�_. _ ..Clic:_..
v a pr
- Df'Pf
View Looking North Across at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking South Across at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent Stream
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking Upstream at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking Downstream at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 h9L SL -1, 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View of Bed at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
MALPINE
DP i4
iF 5_18
View of Bed at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 h9L SL -1, 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]
,ice..
�
MALPINE
DP i4
iF 5_18
View of Bed at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 h9L SL -1, 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View of Bed at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View of Bed at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent RPW
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 h9L SL -1, 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

View Looking North Across at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
View Looking South Across at DP -14, Seasonal Intermittent RPW
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -14
Mecklenburg County, NC Seasonal Intermittent Stream
� ne�iroe / DESIGN • P.O. Dox 163 0 Hiq6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 (/(-1) a-0793

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -15
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1297 Long: -80.7786 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The vegetation in this area is maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed. The soils of the area have been disturbed by sewer line
construction and consist of backfill from soils excavated from trench for pipe installation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 11
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -15
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 100 (A) 160 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.60
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Juncus effusus
40
Yes
FACW
2. Carex crinita
30
Yes
OBL
3. Carex lurida
20
Yes
OBL
4. Solidago gigantea
5
No
FACW
5. Verbascum thapsus
5
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -15
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 100 (A) 160 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.60
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/4 25 Loamy/Clayey-
3-16 7.5YR 4/2 60 7.5YR 4/4 40 Loamy/Clayey Backfill, soil profile is mixed
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
�. -17
��-
4-1 s
r' MAL
t! 0!
DP
1.3-17
Test Pit at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -15
Man-made Wetland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

Vegetation Community Looking East at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
Vegetation Community Looking West at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -15
Mecklenburg County, NC Man-made Wetland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

Vegetation Community Looking Southeast at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
Vegetation Community Looking South at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -15
Mecklenburg County, NC Man-made Wetland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

Vegetation Community Looking North at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
Vegetation Community Looking Northeast at DP -15, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -15
Mecklenburg County, NC Man-made Wetland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -16
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1295 Long: -80.7787 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The vegetation in this area is maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This area was created as a part of sewer line construction.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
75 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -16
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 95 (A) 215 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.26
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Salix nigra
10
Yes
OBL
2. Rubus argutus
10
Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex crinita
20
Yes
OBL
2. Juncus effusus
15
Yes
FACW
3. So/idago gigantea
15
Yes
FACW
4. Microstegium vimineum
15
Yes
FAC
5. Digitaria sanguinalis
10
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
75 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -16
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
FACU species 20 x 4 = 80
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 95 (A) 215 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.26
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-3
7.5YR 4/2
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy/Clayey
3-8
7.5YR 4/2
75
7.5yr 4/4 25 RM
M
Loamy/Clayey
8-11
7.5YR 4/1
70
7.5yr 4/6 30 RM
M
Loamy/Clayey
11-16
7.5YR 4/2
75
7.5yr 4/4 25 RM
M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
WE-_
MVNG
3.7-i8
Test Pit at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -16
Man-made Wetland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

lY ,
MPINE
.:
74
Vegetation Community Looking Northeast at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
Vegetation Community Looking Southwest at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -16
Man-made Wetland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals • NC 9 28077 9 [phone]

Vegetation Community Looking South at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
s
.ik� :"' �. +• dew: .
•
-
'moi f i'.� } f
... 1 4 w }
�
_.�a-'_�
slid
�
f p1ti1 7�. 1' � .:,;y ..
MW
;•
Vegetation Community Looking Southwest at DP -16, Man-made Wetland
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -16
Man-made Wetland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Dox 163 0 H q6 Shoals • NC 9 28077 9 [phone]

Overerview Photograph of Man-made Wetland at DP -16 Looking East
Overerview Photograph of Man-made Wetland at DP -16 Looking West
McAlpine Greenway
Mecklenburg County, NC
Data Point DP -16
Man-made Wetland
CQIPW7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.C. Dox 163 0 H qh Shoals • NC 9 28077 9 [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: mcAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -17
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1296 Long: -80.7788 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Sample plot occurs within center of sewer line. Vegetation is maintained as herbaceous and is periodically mowed. Soils have been disturbed by
sewer line construction. Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Sample plot is well drained.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -17
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 90 (A) 235 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.61
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous vegetation and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Juncus effusus
40 Yes
FACW
2. Solidago altissima
20 Yes
FACU
3. Carex crinita
15 No
OBL
4. Festuca rubra
15 No
FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
90 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: DP -17
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 90 (A) 235 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.61
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sample plot occurs within sewer line easement that has been maintained as herbaceous vegetation and is periodically mowed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/6 Loamy/Clayey
2-16 7.5YR 3/3 60 7.5YR 4/6 40 Loamy/Clayey Disturbed backfill profile
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soil was excavated from trench to install pipe then spread back over area as backfill.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

View of SOIL PROVILE at DP -17, Upland
View of TEST PIT at DP -17, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -17
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQhneYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 0 NC 0 28077 0 [phone]

1.4
W.

- << .. •.�:.. -� tis ,
.. _ .

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: McAlpine Greenway Sardis City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 3-17-18
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP -18
Investigator(s): Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.1304 Long: -80.7730 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan Loam NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Sample plot is in forested area next to ponded portion of maintenance road. Area exhibits upland conditions in an undisturbed state
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: DP -18
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 470 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.24
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Populus deltoides
25
Yes
FAC
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Yes
FACW
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
4.
Platanus occidentalis
10
No
FACW
5.
6.
7.
70
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Ligustrum sinense
60
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Allium canadense
5
Yes
FACU
3.
Microstegium vimineum
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: DP -18
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 145 (A) 470 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.24
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-4
7.5YR 2.5/3
—Black Histic (A3)
Loamy/Clayey
4-12
7.5YR 4/4 80
7.5YR 4/3 20
Loamy/Clayey-
12-16
7.5YR 5/3 75
7.5YR 6/6 25
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

Soils Profile at DP -18, Upland
�.. �., 2.. 3,. 4„ 5„ 6„ 7„ $., 9„ 10" 11" 12
I FIV
Test Pit at DP -18, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -18
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CSk.,Yi., / DESIGN • P.C. Fw ](33 • H a6 Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 • [phone]

is' =`'g
alp^• }� �•�'
� �..
ill
lmw
_..
Y,' t
•ice,,,.. ` ";�
•�
+ ..
.. _i��~ ..v
_� � __
r
Ado,
i
-'- . .+'-

.�.: Yom;_ Yr• • •r:.
tdt+r. }
•- .�M� :mak C�:s• ''"•�. Y., * ��I- �..�. _.
.. � c�k+,�:. .• f.i .. � ,'a i.. � eke �..�;i Y.;;�r:� #'• •� .. '.�
L �: - i � � •• •. III I. + � - � � ` .

View of Looking East Across Road of Vegetation at DP -18, Upland
View of Looking Southeast Across Road of Vegetation at DP -18, Upland
McAlpine Greenway Data Point DP -18
Mecklenburg County, NC Upland
CQIP!K7neYine / DESIGN 0 P.O. Box 163 0 High Shoals 9 NC 9 28077 9 [phone]