20180847 Ver 1_401 Application_20180618 (2)

Staff Review
ID#* Version* 1
20180847
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Andrew Moore:eads\awmoore3
Select Reviewing Office:* Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Dated 6/20/2018
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type:* r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Alea Tuttle
Who is subrritting the information?
Email Address:* [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name:* White Oak Phase 5
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?*
r Yes' No r Unknown
County (ies)*
Henderson
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
961 -White Oak PCN Submitted 6.8.2018.pdf 3.78MB
Only pdf or Wm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
White Oak Phase 5 PCN - submitted to USACE 6.8.2018. Requires 401 Certification for storm water
management.
* I7 By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes

(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date:

Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
June 15, 2018
Mr. David Brown
US Anny Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton A venue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: White Oak Phase 5 (+/-7.7 acres)
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins,
The attached Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of JK Land LLC.
represented by Mr. Ken Lotze. The project site is located off Zeb Corn Road and includes a 7.7
acre parcel located in Henderson County, North Carolina. JK Land LLC. is seeking a Nationwide
Permit 29 for the placement of fill and culverts associated with the construction of a residential
subdivision.
While proposed impacts are below the threshold requiring 401 Certification, the applicant is
requesting written approval from DWR for the storm water management component of the
project. This phased project is exempt from the Henderson County NPDES Phase II post
construction control requirement as the subdivision master plan approval pre-dates the Phase II
requirements. However, the proposed high-density development requires written approval from
DWR to comply with the 401 Certification. The applicant is providing documentation of storm
water management under GC4139 specific condition 5(b).
A copy of this package has been sent to Mr. Byron Hamstead of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Alea Tuttle, P. W. S
Biologist
Copy Furnished:
US Fish and Wildlife Service -Byron Hamstead
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville -Andrew Moore
32 Clayton Street
Asheville. NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel
II� R.Clement Riddle, P.W.S.
Principal
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW-201 -BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder D Assign Action ID Number in ORM D
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: White Oak Phase V
2. Work Type: Private I ✓ I Institutional D Government D Commercial D
3. Project Description/ Purpose [PCN Form 83d and B3e]:
The project purpose is to construct a residential development consisting of 33 residential lots
suitable for singe family dwellings and associated infrastructure.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
JK Land, LLC
s. Agent/ Consultant (PCN Form AS -or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Clearwater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form BSb]:
7. Project Location -Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.364619, -82.439509. The site is located off of Zeb Corn Rd in Henderson County
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID (PCN Form Bla]: 96?0-4 5-5031
9. Project Location -County [PCN Form A2b]: Henderson
10. Project Location -Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Hendersonville
11. Project Information -Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Clear Creek
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: French Broad
Authorization: Section 10 D
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit# 29
Regional General Permit #
Section 404 I ✓ I Section 10 & 404 D
n Pre-Application Request D Unauthorized Activity D Compliance
[Z] Jurisdictional Determination Request D No Permit Required
Revised 20150602
(LearWater
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott Mclendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
5 I 2 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my agent during the
processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of
the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section I 0
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as
needed at the request of the USACE or DWR.
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.
PropertyOwnerofRecord: '-3, k". LAND,_ L L_C~----
Property Owner Address: C?J v S It& E-A{O__M_J.__A....L...:..v-""6'-------
M A, T tt£:"'15 , N\-1 _kl t0.::......,5=----
PhoneNumber: / 0 If -32 I' 5? 27
Email address: d . e (' (' i
Property Location:
Owner/Managing partner Signature: ..J-i::7K-1~W-¥i~~L...-f:~r__L..i..._~~---
Owner/Managing printed name: _._....._.,._c....~-+-f:=-..__.u..._..c.J_, __ L_-_r!)=-_._::__---=:;__-
Date: ____lJj_.LJ.....,A Y~2. ____._4---+--J -=-2. .J.,.<C.-.Q....,__.,_J g.,_ __
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 2880 I
Phone: [phone]
www.cwenv.com
Henderson County, NC
REID:
Listed to:
Malllng Address:
Malllng City, State, Zip:
Physlcal Address:
Deed:
Date Recorded:
Revenue Stamps:
County Zoning:
Property Description:
Map Sheet:
Assessed Acreage:
Bulldlng Value:
Land Value:
Value To Be BIiied:
Tax Parcel Report
WARNING: nus IS NOT A SURVEY
Parcel Information
1006242
JK LAND, LLC
636 SAGEMONT AVE
MATTHEWS, NC 28105
0ZEBCORNRD
003057/00590
2017-05-25 10:55:00.0
1371.00000000
R1
WHITE OAK VILLAGE LOFUTURE
BMSLD-6346
9670.00
7.38000000
$0.00
$110,700.00
$110,700.00
Pin:
Neighborhood:
Township:
Munlclpallty:
Tax District:
Plat:
Elementary School District:
Mlddle School District:
High School District:
Soll:
Voting Precinct:
Commissioner District
Agrlcultural District
North Carollna House District
U.S. House District
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
9670455031
WHITEOAK
Clear Creek
MOUNTAIN HOME FIRE
SLD6346
CLEARCREEK
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
NORTH HIGH
Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent
slopes
Northeast
2
None Found
117
11
North Carollna Senate District 48 Flood Zone: Zone X, Nol Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
Htnd111on Colllly
Geog,aphlc Information Syslems (GIS)
200 Nor1h Grove Slreel
Hend111onvi111, NC 28792
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
WARNING : THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
All lnlonnaUon or dala provided (whllller subscribed, pun:hased or otherwise dillrtbuted) 11 provided II la, wtthoul any
warranUes , Including Ille W11TanH11 of men:hantabflity or of frtnen for• particular pl.W!)OH. Hende11on County and Hs
1 employeea make no wamintiea or guaren1ee1 , eilhtr express or implied. Use or lhl inlonnaUon or dala 1ub1cnbed,
purchased or olherwlle di1lrfbuted, whether In hen! copy or digilal media, shall be al the u1e(1 own ri1k,
_j
Office Use Only :
~ ~
Corps action ID no. ____ _
DWQ project no. _____ _
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a . Type{ s) of approval sought from the Corps: 181 Section 404 Permit D Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit {GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? •Yes 181 No
1d. Type{s) of approval sought from the DWQ {check all that apply}:
181 401 Water Quality Certification -Regular D Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
D 401 Water Quality Certification -Express D Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: •Yes 181 No •Yes 181 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank D Yes 181 No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h •Yes 181 No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern {AEC)? •Yes 181 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: White Oak Phase 5
2b. County: Henderson
2c. Nearest municipality/ town: Hendersonville
2d . Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name{s) on Recorded Deed: JK Land, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 003057/00590
3c. Responsible Party {for LLC if Ken Lotze applicable}:
3d. Street address: 636 Sagemont Ave
3e. City, state, zip: Matthews, NC 28105
3f. Telephone no.: 704-321-5527
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ~ Agent 0 Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d . Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name Clearwater Environmental Consultants Inc. (if applicable):
5c. Street address: 32 Clayton Street
5d . City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
8. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9670455031
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): T Latitude: 35.364619 Longitude: -82.439509
1c. Property size: 7.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Clear Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site consists partially of mixed hardwoods and pasture. Adjacent land use is primarily residential and agricultural
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 .286
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 406
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project purpose is to construct a residential development in Henderson County.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of developing the parcel into 32 residential lots suitable for single family dwellings and associated infrastructure.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the •Yes 181 No D Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
oroiect (including all prior ohases) in the oast? Comments: PJD request submitted with this PCN (Attachment A)
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type 181 Preliminary D Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Clearwater Env. Consultants
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for •Yes 181 No 0 Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? 181 Yes 0 No
6b. if yes, explain.
This is phase 5 of the White Oak residential community, which is in its final phase of development.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a . Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
~ Wetlands ~ Streams -tributaries 0 Buffers D Open Waters D Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Temoorarv (T)
W1 p Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.09
W2 . Choose one Choose one Yes/No .
W3 . Choose one Choose one Yes/No .
W4 . Choose one Choose one Yes/No .
W5 . Choose one Choose one Yes/No .
W6 . Choose one Choose one Yes/No .
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h . Comments:
Impacts will consist of suitable clean fill.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d . 3e . 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (linear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 p Fill S1-UT to Clear Creek INT Corps 149.5
S2 . Choose one . .
S3 . Choose one . .
S4 . Choose one . .
S5 . Choose one . .
S6 . Choose one . .
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 149.5
3i. Comments:
Impacts will consist of a culvert and suitable clean fill.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuallv list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporarv (T)
01 -Choose one Choose
02 -Choose one Choose
03 -Choose one Choose
04 -Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction oroposed, then complete the chart below.
Sa . Sb . Sc. Sd. Se.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
Sf. Total:
Sg. Comments:
Sh . Is a dam high hazard permit required? D Yes •No If yes, permit ID no:
Si. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Sk. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If anv impacts reauire mitiaation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? D Neuse D Tar-Pamlico D Catawba D Randleman D Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 69.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone2
number-mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required? (square (square
Temporarv (T) feet) feet)
B1 -Yes/No
B2 -Yes/No
B3 -Yes/No
B4 -Yes/No
BS -Yes/No
B6 -Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts were avoided on 256.5 ft of stream (63% of the total length) and 0.186 acres of wetland (65% of the total area). Impacts were necessary to
allow for the development of residential lots in the vicinity of the jurisdictional waters, however the impacts to streams and wetlands within these lots
are limited to the portion intended for the construction of dwelling units. The lot design for the development is planned to maximize the number of lots
outside of jurisdictional areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction equipment will be operated from high ground to avoid impacts to the remaining jurisdictional features. Appropriate sediment and erosion
control measures will be utilized on site.
2. Comoensatorv Miticiation for lmoacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for D Yes l8J No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): 0DWQ Ocorps
D Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this D Payment to in-lieu fee program project? D Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Comolete if Usina a Mitlaation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Comolete if Makino a Pavment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. D Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires D Yes 18) No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
D Yes [81 No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
•Yes 0 No
2. Stormwater Manaaement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 28%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Manaaement Plan? [81 Yes •No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached "Supplemental Information"
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? DWQ
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local qovernment's iurisdiction is this project? Henderson County
D Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ONSW
apply (check all that apply}: OUSMP D Water Supply Watershed
[81 Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been OYes [81 No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Proaram Review
Dcoastal counties •HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply •ORW
(check all that apply}: •Session Law 2006-246
[810ther:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been •Yes [81 No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? •Yes •No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? •Yes •No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the •Yes ~No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State OYes ONo
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval •Yes •No letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Welland Standards, •Yes 181 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? OYes 181 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? OYes 181 No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project location is in an area already developed for residential uses and will not substantially increase the demand for additional development
which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the pro~osed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The wastewa er generated on-site will be conveyed via sanitary sewer to a nearby wastewater treatment facility on Balfour Rd. This facility was
constructed with a capacity to treat 4.8-MGD. The daily average flow in 2016 was 3.08-MGD (3, 140,000-gallon per day) or -64%
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or •Yes ~ No habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act •Yes ~No impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, and US Fish and Wildlife List of Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species for Buncombe county. CEC consulted the FWS Northern Long Eared Bat Consultation Areas map. (Attachment B)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? D Yes ~ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystems IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation D Yes ~No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The site is approximately 2 miles from the NR site Berkeley Mills Ballpark (#HN1903), and approximately 3 miles from the the NR site Otto King House
(#HN1910) It is the opinion of CEC that the development of this project will not significantly affect these resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Ba. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? •Y es ~No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
CEC consulted FEMA firm panel 370096700J, effective 10/2/2008.
ALEA· TUTTLE ~ ~-8·/~
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the aoolicant is orovided. l
Page 10 of 10
Supplemental Information

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project requires written approval from DWQ. The project is part of a phased development approved 
prior to July 1, 2007, which is when the NC session law 2006‐246 began requiring Phase II post‐
construction stormwater management under local authority. Therefore, the project is “grandfathered” 
or exempted from approval the local authority  
However, White Oak Phase 5 development is a high‐density project (as defined in 15A NCAC 02H 
.1003(2)(a) in accordance with15A NCAC 02H .1017). Therefore, the applicant proposes to comply with 
the requirements in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5) by providing the following as specified 
in GC4139: 
b. “Provide calculations to document that the project will not cause degradation of downstream surface 
waters. Documentation shall include a detailed analysis of the hydrological impacts from stormwater 
runoff when considering the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from the project built upon area 
and the size and existing condition of the receiving stream(s).” 
The applicant has supplied documentation of the above hydrological analysis with the understanding 
that GC4139 is contingent upon DWQ review and approval of this document.  

Storm Water Hydrological Analysis

In order to ensure no degradation to downstream stream channels from the project, Odom Engineering
determined the pre-development flow velocity using the Chezy-Manning equation with a resulting
velocity of 7.77 feet per second. This was compared the exit velocity of the most downstream pipe (Pipe
1) as determined using Stormwater Studio software with an exit velocity of 5.46 feet per second.

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, May 3 2018
18012 - WHITE OAK PHASE 5 - PRE-DISTURBANCE
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1) = 8.00, 8.00
Total Depth (ft) = 12.00
Invert Elev (ft) = 2115.00
Slope (%)= 5.18
N-Value = 0.033
Calculations
Compute by:Known Q
Known Q (cfs) = 115.00
Highlighted
Depth (ft)= 1.36
Q (cfs)= 115.00
Area (sqft)= 14.80
Velocity (ft/s)= 7.77
Wetted Perim (ft) = 21.93
Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.67
Top Width (ft)= 21.76
EGL (ft)= 2.30
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section
2113.00 -2.00
2115.00 0.00
2117.00 2.00
2119.00 4.00
2121.00 6.00
2123.00 8.00
2125.00 10.00
2127.00 12.00
2129.00 14.00
Reach (ft)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
-- - - - - - - - -~ ,--, __ -- - - - - - - -J --
-' -- - -- -i - -
\. --, - -- - - - -- -
--_:\ -- - ----t -- --,_ \.=-7---- - - -- -- -
---~'\ - - -
, - -- -
- - -- -'7 - - - -- - - -\. - - - - - -
- - - -~ - -V---- - - -
-7 ----- - -- -
-----\. -V / - - -- -
~ -~/'=== - - - - -- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - -- ----
ODOM ReportProject Name: WHITE OAK PHASE 5Stormwater Studio 2017 v 2.0.0.5305-01-2018LineNo.InletIDDrainAreaRunoffCoeffiInletIncrQQCapturedGrateAreaGrateLenGrateWidthGutterSpreadInletSpreadLineIDLineLengthInvertUpInvertDnLineSlopeLineSizeFlowRateCapac.FullVelAveVelDnVelUpDnStrmLine No.HGLDnHGLUpHGLJunct(ac) (C) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (sqft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft) (in) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (ft/s) (ft/s)(ft) (ft) (ft)1 JB-10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .... .... .... .... .... .... PIPE-183.38 2126.50 2126.00 0.006 48 68.63 111.24 5.59 5.46 5.72 Outfall 2130.00 2130.14 2130.242 AB-20.07 0.65 9.13 0.42 0.42 .... .... .... 0.50 0.50 PIPE-296.13 2127.20 2126.60 0.0062 42 68.63 79.47 7.13 7.14 7.13 1 2130.59 2131.04 2131.203 AB-30.08 0.52 9.13 0.38 0.38 .... .... .... 0.47 0.47 PIPE-3133.57 2129.40 2127.30 0.0157 42 68.22 126.15 8.13 7.09 9.16 2 2131.51 2131.93 2131.934 AB-418.30 0.41 9.04 67.84 67.84 .... .... .... 9.58 9.58 PIPE-438.09 2130.00 2129.50 0.0131 42 67.84 115.27 8.18 7.25 9.11 3 2132.77 2132.53 2132.97Notes: IDF File = HENDERSONVILLE.idf, Return Period = 25-yrs. Total Qs limited to inlet captured flows. Pipe travel time suppressed.Project File: WHITE OAK PH5.sws
White Oak (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Legend
Project Boundary
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
Site Vicinity
Figure 1
Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: BWY 3.1.18; CEC Project# 961
Project Boundary
~ r -----T 3 ~-------J
Kang
...
(LearWater
White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
0 1,000 2,000500Feet
Legend
Project Boundary
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
USGS Topographic MapHendersonville Quad Figure 2
Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: KAY 2.12.18; CEC Project# 961
(LearWater
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
0 100 20050Feet
Legend
Project Boundary
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
Aerial PhotographNCCGIA 2015Figure 3
Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: KAY 2.12.18; CEC Project# 961
HyC
HyB
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
0 100 20050Feet
Legend
Project Boundary
Soils
HyB Hayesville Loam, 2-7% slopes
HyC Hayesville Loam, 7-15% slopes
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
USDA Soils MapFigure 4Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: AKT 5.23.18; CEC Project# 961
S1W1
W2
Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, NC OneMap, NC Centerfor Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
Legend
Project Boundary
Wetland
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
Proposed Wetland Impact (0.09 AC)
Proposed Stream Impact (149.5 LF)
Culvert
Proposed Road
Proposed Water Line
Proposed Stormwater Drainage
Proposed contours
Existing Sewer Line
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
Impact MapFigure 5Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: AKT 6.6.18; CEC Project# 961
1111 -I ..
--/
(LearWater
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
White Oak Phase 5 (+/- 7.7 AC)
Ü
0 500 1,000250Feet
Legend
Project Boundary
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
Special Floodway
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
32 Clayton StreetAsheville, North Carolina 28801
FEMA Floodplain MapFIRM panel 370096700JFigure 6
Henderson County,North Carolina
Drawn by: AKT 5.23.18; CEC Project# 961
~ ~
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
(LearWater
~ -I I I \ ·, .......... -VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCAL-E) LINE TABLE ALONG ZEB CORN ROAD LINE NUMBER BEARING DISTANCE L-0 N OB'OB'37" E 170.90' u N 11'47'52" E 73.4B' L-2 N IG'l~'4~" E 75.B3' L-3 N 19"1014211 E 15.45' L-4 N 20'33'2G" E 72.55' L-5 N 22'0B'l3" E 35,53' Sped a I Note: This subdivision lies within 1/2 mile of ICl'ld in a Farmland Preservation District. LEGEND, 0 E:SP -EXISTING STEEL-PIN 0 EIP -EXISTING IRON PIN 0 NIP -NEV'! IRON PIN SET R/V'i -RIGf-ff -OF-V'IAY eUP -UTILITY POL-E 0 -CAL-CUL-ATED POINT D.B. -DEED BOOK ---OHU--OVERI-IEAD UTILITY LINES -G--UNDERGROUND GAS LINE Earline Cox (477/539) Richard V'iolf (94~/757) --UTIUTY L-OT FOR SEWER UFT STATION m I I I "' 1 I 317• I Preliminary (NOT For Recordation, Conveyances or Sales) ~ I ® ~ lO 'I" 75.01 (.5' ,0 ~ lO 'I" I fJ ] J t-" u ~ ~ '15,0' -------~ 'ju --. X ~---~~ IB' 45' R/W ALTERNATE TURN-A-ROUND NOTE, ANY COMBINATION OF THE ABOVE ENGINEERING APPROVED TYPICAl SECTION, CUl-DE-SAC AND/OR Al TERNATE TURN-A-ROUND, (I.E., A ,..g bO.S' ."'I I E/: / @ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,,,,,;,A'3v! \:c s '" ,oe.o?.' -\ \ \ \ \ -Douglas E. Watkins (1049/519) S 05'0B'30" W -l?_Q.o7~ ----------------® 5@ "TEE" OR 'HAMMERHEAD" SHAPED CUl-DE-SAC) THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE TURNING RADIUS AND AREA, AS SHOWN HEREON, SHOUlD BE DEEMED IN CCMPUANCE WITH APPROVED ENGINEERING STANDARD PRACTICES AND AS SUCH1 MEETS THE HENDERSON COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION l70-2IC ( TABlE I, SUBNOTE 2) AND l70-21H FOR Al TERNATE DEAD ENDS, CUL-5-DE-SAC, AND TURNAROUNDS. I 123,0' }_ \ \\ @ ~ ~ , TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 112•:r_ (N.T.S.) • COL-L-ECTOR ROAD, Middle Street Orly 501 R/H -181 Pavement • L-OCAL ROAD, N. Frederick Lane, N Marjorie Lane1 md Portion of N. Aliette Lme 451 R/Jt.J -101 Pavement • UMITED L-OCAL ROAD, Portior of N. Aliette L-me 301 R/W -141 Pavement • CUL-DE-SAC, See detail this sheet A (R/W Width) C[_ I B -Pavement Width 11-4',I' 1121,11 wW -Shoulder Width C (GBAC Thickne55) D (Asphalt Thickne,,) ~-' h TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION (N.T.S.) Road Type A B C D E Co1ledor 50' R/W IB' B" 1.511 1-2 4' Local 45' R/W IG' G" 1.511 1-2 4' Limited Local 30' R/W 141 G" 1.511 1-2 2' u All road types shall have a ditch slope in accordance with l-lenderson County Subdivision Ordinance Section 170-21C (Table 1). F 2d 1.5,1 1.5,1 Ruth Cannon (6921009) a ¥2. I I I "! I ~ I I ;;, R I PcJ . "'--~-(§) '16.5' "' !!i @ ;;, 95.Q1 !Rf I I /; -//7,51 / 22_5, @ ~;;,I @ -fl'!-FM ---101x701 Sight Tria,gle (Typical) __Z --_FH_l'l"l_l'l'I 85.4' -"' -w -"' -1-j -"1 -w -----=----,.,,, "'--==-----a:iu--= ... _ -~------F-. ~--,.,.,_g ~ ~ _w_w __ J./ __ w ~---------'U ______ _ LoJ Zeb Corn Road 'u UP Ernest Wright (914/639) @ \ © "' ---------------=:::. ........ 0 A\\\ ® ,,,::, / // / / / / 0 @) ---'\ DEED D.B, 723 @ Pg 272 I z I 50 0 50 100 150 -NOTES, SCALE IN FEET SCALE, 111 = 50' I. For source of title, see Deed Book 723 at Page 272. 2. This property is not located in a designated flood hazard zone or per FIRM Mop 11370125 OOB5 B, doted March I, 19B2. 3. Survey closure does not exceed 1:71500 before adjustment. 4. Subject to the Right of Way for Zeb Com Road (5.R. 1553). 5. Subject to a Natural Gosline Right-of-way as shown hereon and on unrecorded plat by Gary L. Corn, RLS dated Feb. 201 19Bb. "-Subject to an Easement for the Overhead end/or Underground Utilities, as shown hereon, or as recorded. 0 Road Note: The private road indicated on this plat may not meet the reqµirements of NCDOT for acceptance into the state rood system, Preliminary (NOT For Recordation, Corveyances or Soles) @ J ! !~ \ 111,11 "' / ----\ o~./ / I 1-.............. / / / @ / 0 / / / / / /@ / / / /\ ® 0 / / / ~ ,,'),· d ,, -10-• -:;,, ,cf, -~ ,,,,,, >-® / \ '\ ' / \o,\>(\ /,<_'0,,_.,_'v / 0 :\ .,1-\ ' -~1/, 0 ® ~ 0 A, ~ \, Phase 5 -Lot Summary Lot Lot Size Lot Size w/o R/N Lot Size w/o R/N No. (Sq,ft.) (Sq, ft.) ( Acres) I Gc>,904 4,422 0.102 2 7 000 5 250 0.121 3 7,112 5,302 0.123 4 11 Gc>9B 5,471 0.12Gc> 5 B,420 4,514 0.104 0 7 000 5 250 0.121 7 7,004 5,254 0.121 B B, Gc>51 Gc>,021 0.13B 9 10,340 7,312 O.IGc>B 10 7,571 0 4BB 0.149 11 7,200 7,200 0.1Gc>5 12 7 200 0 Gc>BB 0.154 13 7,200 0,300 0.145 14 Ge> BOO 5 077 0.117 15 9,305 B, 150 O.IB7 I Ge> 12,045 B 7Gc> 7 0.201 17 B, 731 Gc>,945 0.159 IB B,194 Gc>,417 0.147 19 7,050 Gc>,903 0.15B 20 7. I 19 Ge> 305 0.14Gc> 21 7,307 0,507 0.149 22 7 322 Ge> 390 0.147 23 Gc>,B41 5,971 0.137 24 7,124 0,319 0.145 25 B,094 7,117 0.1Gc>3 2Gc> 9 73B 7 457 0.171 27 15,2B2 12,957 0.297 2B B,319 B,319 0.191 29 B,352 B,352 0.192 30 7,143 7,134 0.1Gc>4 31 I0,70Gc> 7,972 O.IB3 32 10,912 7,159 0.1Gc>4 33 7,022 7,022 0.175 / PHASE MAP (NOT TO SCAL-E) Preliminary (NOT For Recordation, Corveyances or Sales) IL 0 ...... ti w ::t <Sl lO 0 UJ -:i. (S) 3 z 0 Ol < ~ 0 IU LL I Q z IU z :i: <( l\... _J IL Q._ ;/\ I z I-g z ~ w I/" ,::: IU < IU Q._ l'J 0 °' _J 0 ; w > u ~ w Cl ~ IU ---' ---' > 5 -~ I IU Q z ~ IU :i: Z z~ 0 0~ <fl> o,'oc '" wo \JJ I-~ (l" a.! ~~ ~ ~<!!IL___.~ ~ r:~ reg; z<(gu-.1 z \fl %'9, 5 :J ru 11t~ <ILc!~j• I ]'. ~ f;ii' l\... ~ ~g ~ >' ~~ IU z• ~ ¥• Z ~ g ~~~ ' ~ ;;;t-o ~ ~~ ~ U)ffi<D~q al "' o,' :l • z w' -f--oc ~ ~ f--fil IIJ <( ~ Q_ i _J---' :::i < < t~ l\... i (.f) z 0 (.f) > w 0,: 0 z 3: <( 0,: D u ~ _,,.-L 0 Q_ -" 8 .1l ]" 3: L " <: 3 0 ~ <: " L L ~ '-' ;j;@ .it, :, z '" ~ ~ ~ & "'-cl Q CIC ' :,: f!' " ' IU C I:' ,, ;j; ~ ... ,. " i; Cl , • N "' r---"' N ' ..,. ... rf" "' "' I '"' ~ ' ro 0 N r---r---... <Y ' (lJ 8 D --~ ,.___ § 0 z <: ~ 1i " ~ L " o" °' " X 8 0 f--~ z C " < 0 ~ --l .. _ ~ l:l... IS) -\-:~ ~ Z-5 ll'i UJ ...s::i. I= ~ ::J l l:l... U) Os.. 8 ....J O N UJ ·=~ :::,.. ~ -UJ ~ °' Q ~ @)
r
EX!~G 5_!!.0M BED
;
CONCRETE HEADWALL
---
48"0HDPE
/NV: 2 I 26. 00
---
STORM PIPE CROSS SECTION
N.T.5.
Attachment A: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
M
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmmglon Oistrici
Jurisdictional Determination Request
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.sa w. usace .army.mi 1/M issi ons/Regu latoryPerm i tProgram /Contact/County Loe a tor .aspx ,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTI'E REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
69 Darlington A venue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 9 I 0-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D-PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 0 Zeb Corn Road
City, State: Hendersonville, NC 28791
County: Henderson
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9670-45-5031
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name: R. Clement Riddle ----------=---'---------
Mailing Address: 32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
D I am the current property owner.
I ✓ I I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
D Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
D Other, please explain. _______________ _
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: JK Land, LLC ___ __,_ ___________ _
Mailing Address: 636 Sagemont Ave
Matthews, NC 28105
Telephone Number: 704-321-5527
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Fonn/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page2
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3·4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean W ater Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner ofrecord of the property.
See Attached
Print Name
Capacity: D Owner D Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
~cess.
l.lJ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section IO list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide. D A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. D I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. D I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. D Other: ________________________ _
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization fonn/letter signed by owner(s).
Version : May 2017 Page 3
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I ✓ I I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
D I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
•
G.
[Z]
•
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AID) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved IDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AIDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AID for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area _7_._7 __ acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4
H.
0
Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordin ates (Dec imal Degrees): Latitude: 35. 364619
Longitude : -82.439509
A legible delineat ion map depicting the aquatic re s ources and the property/review area.
Delinea tion map s must b e no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the s ubmitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved). 6
• North Arrow
• Graphical Scale
• Boundary of Review Area
• Date
• Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US , 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
• Jurisdic tional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navi gable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US , stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, p ond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
• Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Ple ase
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", ''No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
• Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Pote ntial Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these fe atures as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at leas t one wetl and and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the g uida nce docume nt title d "Survey Sta nd ards fo r Juri sdic ti o nal Detenninatio ns" to e ns ure that the
supplied m ap meets th e n ecessary mapping sta ndards . http ://www.saw.usa ce.a rmy .mil/Miss ions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/J urisd iction/
Vers ion: May 201 7 Page 5
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
•
•
[Z]
•
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCW AM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
7 www .saw .usace.a rmy .mil/Portals/59/doc s/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fil lable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army .mi l/M issions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Juri sdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal , state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law . Your name and property location where federal j uri sdiction is to be determined will be in cl uded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AID), which will be made availa ble to the public on the District's website
and on th e Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is not provided , the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be iss ued .
Version: May 2017 Pa ge 6
White Oak Phase 5 (+/-7.7 AC)
,·
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within sub-meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping
grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may demonstrate
uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field; however, they have
not been surveyed. Although Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment, the US Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US
delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to change until written verification is obtained. CEC strongly
recommends that written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or making
any legal reliance on this determination .
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for informational
purposes only and should not be used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal descriptions.
This map shall not be construed to be an official survey of any data depicted .
Source Data: Field collected data 2/27/2018; Associated Land Surveyors (Cameron Baker, PLS) provided by Odom Engineering.
0 ,~
,,--:,~·. .. ,; \
/
0 /
-✓ ' -~ \
Legend
--------~
L___ _ __ j Project Boundary
Potential Wetland
Potential Intermittent Stream
Potential Perennial Stream
Culvert
Contours
* Data Form
Drawn by: AKT 2 .27.18; CEC Project# 961
Henderson County,
North Carolina
0
l)
.. ~ ~· ·~·
0 · ( J \ .
.... §
-~ /
I
I
Potentially Jurisdictional Water
Wetland (AC) Stream (LF)
Wl 0.150 Sl 406
W2 0.137
Total 0.286 Total 406 .
200
Esri, f.:t.!:RE, Ga_rmin, ©1OP,enStreetMap contriEit)]ub'=:;::::;=;~:::;;::;:::::'..!,;,:~
for G~~fi plii_c ·[nformation and Analysis, NC 911 Bgard
(LearWater Jurisdictional Determination
Delineated 2/27/2018
32 Clayton Stree t
Asheville, North Coro lin o 2880 I
Appendix 2 -PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 6/6/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: See Agent Authorization
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Henderson City: Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.364619 Long.: -82.439509
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Clear Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
D Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
[i] Field Determination. Date(s): 2/27/2018
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
W1 35.3633 -82.4408 0.15 AC Wetland Section 404
W2 35.3632 -82.4409 0.137 AC Wetland Section 404
S1 35.3638 -82.4404 406 LF Non-Wetland Section 404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Iii Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
MapYicinity, USGS Topographic, Aer ial, USDA Soil and Stream/Wetland Delineation Maps .
liJ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
D Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. D Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ________ _
D Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _____________________ .
D Corps navigable waters' study: _______________________ _
D U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: __________________ _
0 USGS NHD data.
0 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUG maps.
Iii U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 :24K Hendersonville Quad
liJ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
D National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________________ _
D State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________________ _
0 FEMA/FIRM maps: _______________________ _
D 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: _______ .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Iii Photographs: Ii] Aerial (Name & Date): _N_C_C_G_IA_20_1_5 ____________ _
or D Other (Name & Date): _________________ _
D Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ___________ _
D Other information (please specify): _____________________ _
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: White Oak Phase V City/County: Henderson County Sa mpling Date: 2/27/2018
ApplicanVOwner: _J_K_L_a_n_d-'-, _LL_C ________________________ State: NC Sampling Point: __ W_1 __
lnvestigator(s): _A_K_,_B_Y ________________ Sec tion , T ownship, Range: _C_le_a_r_C_r_e_ek _____________ _
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): streambank, base of hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2% -----------
Subregion (LRR or ML RA): _L_R_R_N ____ _ Lat: 35.3633 Long: -82.4408 Datum : NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: _H_a~y_es_v_il_le_L_o_a_m ______________________ _ NWI classification: --------
Ar e climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year ? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation
Are Vegetation
, Soil
, Soil
, or Hydrology
, or Hydrology
significan tl y disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No --Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? --
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No --
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
-Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (814) -
_x_High Water T able (A2) --Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Saturation (A3) -O xidized Rhi zospheres on Living Roots (C3)
--Water Marks (81) -Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
-Sediment Deposits (82) -Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
-Drift Deposits (83) -Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Algal Mat or Crust (84) -Other (Explain in Remarks)
--Iron Deposits (85)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_x_Water-Stained Leaves (89)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations:
Yes
Yes x
No x
No
Depth (inches): __ _
Yes X No ----
Secondary Indica tors (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
x Drainage Patterns (810)
x Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_x_Crayfish Burrows (CB)
__ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed P lants (D1)
_ Geomorphlc Position (0 2)
_Sha ll ow Aqultard (03)
_ Microtopographic Relief (04)
FAG-Neutra l Test (D5)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(Includes capillary fringe)
Yes x No
Depth (Inches): __ 1 __
Dep th (inches): __ o __ Wetland Hydrol ogy Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If availabl e:
Remarks:
Hydrology emanating from hillslope seeps, at base of hillslope, a nd from a terrace near s anitary sewer m ahole.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2 .0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants Sampling Poi nt: W1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Betula nigra 40 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum 10 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 7 (8)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1% (NB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover Total% Cover of: Mu ltiply by:
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 OBL species 10 x1= 10
Sa12ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species 45 x2 = 90
1. A/nus serrulata 10 Yes OBL FAC species 12 x3= 36
2. Ligustrum sinense 10 Yes FACU FACU species 20 x4= 80
3. Elaeagnus angustifolia 5 Yes FACU UPL species 0 x5 = 0
4. Column Totals: 87 (A) 216 (8)
5. Prevalence Index = 8/A = 2.48
6. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation -
8. X 2 -Dominance Test is >50% -
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is S3.01
-4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 25 =Total Cover --data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plotslze: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) -
1. Huperzia lucidula 5 Yes FACW 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Yes FACU present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Viola sp. 2 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6.
height.
7. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9.
(1 m) tall.
10. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12 =Total Cover Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 6 20% of total cover: 3 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is moderately disturbed. Sparse herb layer. Surveyed during dormant season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2 .0
SOIL Sampling Po int: W1
Profile Descripti on: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % T ype1 Loc2 Textur e Remarks ------
0-3 SY 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Pro minent redox concentrations --------
3-5 SY 5/2 85 10YR 3/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox con centrations --------
5-12 SY 5/1 90 7.SYR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent red ox concentr ations --------
--------
--------
--------
--------
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soll Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 :
-Histosol (A 1) -Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) -2 cm Mu ck (A10) (MLRA 147)
-Hlstic Epipedon (A2) -Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) -Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
--Black Histic (A3) -Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
-Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -Piedmont Floodplain S oils (F19)
-Stratified Layers (AS) L Depleted Matrix {F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
-2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) -Red Parent Material (F21)
-Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) ? Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) ---
-Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) --Iron-Ma nganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, --Other (Explain in Remarks)
-Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
-Sandy Redox (SS) -Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
-Stripped Matrix (S6) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) weUand hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or probl ematic.
Restri ctive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet Is revi sed from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to Include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Vers ion 2 .0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET -Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: White Oak Phase V City/County: Henderson County Sam pling Date: 2/27/2018
ApplicanUOwner: .;;J.:.:K...;L:;;a.:.:n.::.d~, L::;L::;C:...... _______________________ state: NC Sampling Point: __ u_1 __
lnvestigator(s): .:.:A.:.:K.;.:.,_8_Y ________________ Section, Township, Range: ...;C.:.:le_a.;..r_C_r_ee_k _____________ _
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): _h_ill_s_id_e _________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): .::.co.:..n.:.:v...;e.;.;x _____ Slope(%): __ 1°_1/o __
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _L_R_R_N_____ Lat: 35.3633 Long: -82.4408 Datum : NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ..:.H:..::.a:!.y.::.es;;.v...;il.:.:le:...;L::;o:;;a.:.:m~----------------------NWI c lassification: _______ _
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year?
Are Vegetation X , Soil
Are Vegetation , Soil
, or Hydrology
, or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area --
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X --------
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point taken on hillside north of W1. Edge between mowed field and forested stream/wetland area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (814) ---
-High Water Table (A2) -
-Saturation (A3) -
-Water Marks (81) -
-Sediment Deposits (82) -
-Drift Deposits (83) --
-Algal Mat or Crust (84) --
_Iron Deposits (85)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
_Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations:
No
No
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth (inches): __ _
--Depth (inches): __ _
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Dry-Season Water Tabl e (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
__ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
__ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
__ Geomorphlc Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_FAG-Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes
Yes
Yes No Depth (inches): __ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks :
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Versi on 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: U 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Betula nigra 10 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 .0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
10 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 OBL species 0 x1= 0
Sa~ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) F ACW species 10 x2= 20
1. Rhus glabra 10 Yes UPL FAC species 50 x3 = 150
2. FACU species 40 x4= 160
3. UPL species 10 x5= 50
4. Column Totals: 110 (A) 380 (B)
5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.45
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation -
8. 2 -Dominance Test is >50% -
9. 3 -Prevalence Index is S3.01 -
10 =Total Cover 4 -Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting -data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) -
1. Panicum virgatum 40 Yes FAC 11nd icators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Andropogon virginicus 30 Yes FACU present, unless disturbed or prob lematic.
3. Phytolacca americana 10 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Trifo/ium repens 10 No FACU Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6 .
height.
7. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9.
(1 m) tall.
10. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover Woody Vine -All woody vines greater than 3 .28 ft in
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18 height.
Woody_ Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is moderately disturbed. Sparse canopy. Surveyed during dormant season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2 .0
SOIL Samplin g P oint: U1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Rem arks ------
0-2 2.5Y 5/2 100 Loamy/Clayey --------
2-12 2.5Y 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey -------
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
1Type: C=Concentralion, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Localion: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soll Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils3
:
-Hlstosol (A1) -Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148) --2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
-Hislic Epipedon (A2) -Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) -Coast Prairie Redox (A 16)
-Black Hislic (A3) -Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
-Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) --Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
-Stratified Layers (A5) -Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
-2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) -Red Parent Materi al (F21)
-Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
-Thick Dark Surface (A12) -Redox Depressions (FB) -Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
-Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) -Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, --Other (Explain in Remarks)
-Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
-Sandy Redox (S5) -Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3 indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
--Stripped Matrix (S6) -Pi edmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be p resent,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Par ent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soll Present? Yes No X
Remarks :
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to Include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils , Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 q& I
Date: ):-3.._ f ·· / ?J ProjecUSite: W h I O a./<. Latitude: -~), -3 (p 3 4 / ~
Evaluator: A---r 'B County: 1/-endPrSef>v Longitude: -81 , 440&0
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if?. 19 or erennial if?. 30•
A. Geomorpholoav (Subtotal ;:
1•· Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool,
rioole-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6 . Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9 . Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
)
a artificial ditches are not rated, see d1scuss1ons 1n manual
8. Hvdroloav (Subtotal= -:::,-' c:; )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
Absent Weak
0 1
0 co
0 0
0 1
J1 ( 1 ')
( 0 ) 1
0 1
0 c...n
0 ~
0 / ~ 0.51
l No= OJ
' -
-
I 0 ) 1
~ -~ 1 -----,1·
(~ 1
0 ~
0 l o.5 )
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
Moderate Strong
2 l 3 J
2 3
2 3
2 ( 3 ')
2 3
2 3
( 2 ) 3
----;: 3
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes= 3
2, 3
\ 2 'J 3
0.5 __a_
1 -" .......--, ...... /
1 .,,----1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No= 0 (Yes= 3))
C. BioloQy (Subtotal= ( I) ) ,,..........__
18. Fibrous roots in streambed w 'J 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed ( _3 )J 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note divers ity and abundance) Q \) 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0) 1 2 3
22. Fish 0) 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish ( ~ 0 .5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0~ 0.5 1 1 .5
25. Algae o 'J 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed -P:AGW 9 .75; OBL ~ 5 eu,er e ~
•perennial streams may als o be identified using oth er methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Do a...th c,f-a1-·h a bov..e.. ..J2_ c, /,._,_~ .C..t. 1 h (J a d ,:c,,<-+ a J,, r; v.P
S ~ Cl c::\ r7)u VJ o{ Wo -I-,/" Ir) 'i) I A°":'t-tr--lb o V'P h.l ad r ., f-,s CL
0 V -t I S r.d,11,1...211+ ha ,,/ /ol'7;(1ou..d_
Sketch:
ycl•~ M? C. ti O )1 W I fy\_ 1-=e. CJ)(_ I ole_
1o"'''"~ r:.-¼.,~c). sh-ecu,u_,
fi\JV ~ [J ("'-{) ioe..ol..
Y~') ..\-,rJJ,L GV\ I
H-(.,,, \(\
-
Attachment B: Threatened and Endangered Species Data
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
May 23, 2018
Alea Tuttle
Clearwater Environmental Consultants
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: White Oak Phase V; 961
Dear Alea Tuttle:
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
NCNHDE-6106
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https;//www,fws.gov/offices/D irectory/ListOffices.cfm? statecode:;;3 7.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally-listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney ,buUer@ncdcr,gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS:
1651 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2769£4.1651
Telephone: [phone]
wv11v .ncnhp.org
LOCATION :
121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Wi thin a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
White Oak Phase V
Project No. 961
May 23, 2018
NCNHDE-6106
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EOID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 33444 Calopteryx amata Superb Jewelwing 2004-Pre H? 5-Very Significantly G4
Damselfly Low Rare
Freshwater 29693 Strophitus undulatus Creeper 2010-08-25 E 3-Med ium Threatened GS
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish 5893 Erimystax insignis Blot ched Chub 2014-04-10 E 3-Medium Significantly G4
Rare
Mammal 32983 Spilogale putorius Eastern Spotte d Skunk 1982-Pre H 5-Very Gam e Anima l G4
Low
Mayfly 34624 Tsalia berneri a mayfly 2001-03-13 E 3-Medium Signifi cantly G4
Rare
Vascular Plant 25168 Dendrolycopodium Prickly Ground-pine 1949-Pre H 5-Very Significa ntly GS
dendroideum Low Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant 17819 Sarracenia jonesii Mountain Sweet Pilcher 1987-Pre X 4-Low Endangered Endangered G4T2
Plant
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
State
Rank
S1S2
S 3
S2
S 2
S 3
S2
S1
Definitions and an explanation o f status desi gnatio ns and code s can be foun d a t http s:/Jncnhde natureserve org/cont enUh elp. Da ta query g enerated on M ay 23, 2018: source: NCNHP, Q2 April 201 8. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one ye ar elapses b e fore project initiation as new informati o n is continually add ed to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 o f 3
~.
1.
. ,,.
May 23, 2018
.J•t•I ,· ,.
D Project Boundary
D Buffered Project Boundary
NCNHDE-6106: White Oak Phase V
Page 3 of3
Ook HIii ,_.·
• 1,....,
. , ,
·~~,...=
0
0
•,•.1•11.,,,.
,·, .. ,11 t.::.,.-~ r ,, ?
~..::::•"LI'
0.175
0.275
, __
' .
, .
•\ ,~
. .,
';/•~, ~---~
t,l•1
1 :21 ,555
0 .35
0,55
,•,::-..• rt
0.7 ml
1.1 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, Gannn, lnterm;p, increment P Corp. GEBCO , USGS
FAO. NPS, NRCN-1, GeoBase, I GN. Kadaster N L, Orclrunce Survey, Esn J.ap.1n.
METI. E1,n Chl"la (Hong Kong), swint®o. C OllenStrfftM::a i, con t1ibuto11 . .,,nd
lhe GIS U&er Conwnunity
Henderson County, NC
REID:
Listed to:
Malling Address:
Malling City, State, Zip:
Phyalcal Address:
Deed:
Date Recorded:
Revenue Stamps:
County Zoning:
Property Description:
Map Sheet
Assessed Acreage:
Bulldlng Value:
Land Value:
Value To Be BIiied:
Tax Parcel Report
WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
Parcel Information
1006242
JK LAND, LLC
636 SAGEMONT AVE
MATTHEWS, NC 28105
0ZEB CORN RD
003057/00590
2017-05-25 10:55:00.0
1371.00000000
R1
WHITE OAK VILLAGE LOFUTURE
BMSLD-6346
9670.00
7.38000000
$0.00
$110,700.00
$110,700.00
Pin:
Neighborhood:
Township:
Munlclpallty:
Tax District:
Plat:
Elementary School District:
Middle School District:
High School District:
Soll:
Voting Precinct:
Commissioner District
Agrlcuttural District
North Carolina House District
U.S. House District
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
9670455031
WHITEOAK
Clear Creek
MOUNTAIN HOME FIRE
SLD6346
CLEARCREEK
APPLE VALLEY MIDDLE
NORTH HIGH
Hayesville loam, 2 to 7 percent
slopes
Northeast
2
None Found
117
11
North Carolina Senate District 48 Flood Zone: Zone X, Nol Shaded (Areas
outside of the floodplain)
---
Hender1on Co!Mlty
Geographic Information System• (GIS)
200 North Grwe Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792
P: [phone]
F: [phone]
---
WARNING : THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.
AJl lnformaUon or data provid ed (whelher sub&cribad, purchased or olherwi1e distributed) Is provided as 11, without any
warranUe&, Including lhe warranua, of men:hantabillty or of fi!nau for a particular purpose. Henderson County and ltl
employees make no warranUes or guaranlaes, either expreu or Implied. Use of lhe lnformaUon or data &ubscribed ,
purcha&ed or otherwise distributed, whether In hard copy or digital media, shall be 11 the uufs own risk.
I
I
I
I
I