20180661 Ver 1_401 Application_20180518

CLearWalej
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
March 12, 2018
Mr. David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
RE: Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 Acres)
Nationwide Permit 12
Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown,
201 80881
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of Henderson
County represented by Mr. Marcus Jones. The project site spans approximately thirteen acres
from North Rugby Road to I-26 in Henderson County, North Carolina. The applicant is seeking a
Nationwide Permit 12 for the authorization of temporary wetland and stream impacts associated
with the installation of a sewer line.
In addition to the PCN, parcel information for the project is included in Attachment A. Henderson
County is currently in the process of acquiring the proposed sewer line easement via eminent
domain and a draft of this agreement is also included in Attachment A. A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination request is included in Attachment B.
A copy of this package has been sent to Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Service for review. A
courtesy copy of this application has also been submitted to Mr. Zan Price of the NC Division of
Water Resources, Asheville Regional Office. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-
9800 if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
7
aylie A. Y ra
Biologist
Copy Furnished:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission — Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Service — Byron Hamstead
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville — Zan Price
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel
R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S
Principal

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORMFI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Mud Creek Sewer Line
2. Work Type: Private El Institutional F] Government W1 Commercial F1
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and 63e]:
The purpose of the proposed project is to authorize wetland and stream impacts for the installation
of a sewer line.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Henderson County attn. Mr. Marcus Jones
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: ClearWater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.399803, -82.517744; 13 AC linear sewer line project spanning between 1-26 and N. Rugby Road
in Henderson County, NC.
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bia]: See Attachment A for Parcel Information
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Henderson
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Hendersonville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: LIT Mud Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: French Broad/06010105
Authorization: Section 10 E] Section 404 R Section 10 & 404 R
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 12
Regional General Permit #
✓0 Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

&e?i�W ager
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Alin: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby
authorize Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact
Wetlands and Water of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. By signing below, I
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and N.C. Division of Water Resources to enter upon the property herein described for the
purpose of conducting on-site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional
determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as needed
at the request of the USACE or DWR.
Property Owner of Record: Henderson County
Property Owner Address:
1 Historic Courthouse Square, Suite 6
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Phone Number: 828 694-6560
Email address: [e-mail]
Property Location: Southwest quadrant of 11--26 and US25 intersection
0 Owner/Managing partner Signature:
Owner/Managing printed name: Marcus A. Jo7d
Date:
March 8, 2018
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
www.civenv.com

0
�0f W ATF�1?
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWO (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -004 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Mud Creek Sewer Line
2b. County:
Henderson
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Hendersonville, NC
2d. Subdivision name:N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Deed Information is included in Attachment A.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Deed information is included in Attachment A.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Henderson County, atin. Mr. Marcus Jones
3d. Street address:
1 Historic Courthouse Square
3e. City, state, zip:
Hendersonville, NC 28792
3f. Telephone no.:
N/A
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC)
5c. Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828-698-9800
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Property identification information is included in
Attachment A.
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.399803 Longitude: -82.517744
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
+/-13 AC
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
LIT Mud Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
French Broad/06010105
Page 2of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area spans approximately 13 acres from North Rugby Road to 1-26 in Henderson County, North Carolina.
General land use within the vicinity of the project is primarily residential and commercial.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There is approximately 5.241 acres of wetland located within the project boundary.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
There is approximately 338 linear feet of stream located within the project boundary.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to authorize temporary wetland and stream impacts for the installation of a sewer
line.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the installation of a sewer line (Figure 3.0 -Figure 3.9). Typical construction and earth moving
equipment would be utilized, as well as erosion control devices and best management practices. The utility line would be
installed using the "trench -cut" method. After installation, impacted wetlands and stream beds and banks would be
returned to original contours and stabilized with matting and appropriate seed (Figure 3.7 and Figure 3.8). A 10 -foot -wide
corridor will be maintained for maintenance activities. Proposed temporary stream impacts will occur in the dry via the use
of a pump -around system/apparatus (Figure 3.9).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: A PJD request has been included in Attachment
B.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the Jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (If known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Wetland Impact
W 1 ❑ P ®T
#1 — Wetland 1
(WI), Sewer Line
PFO
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.517 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W2 [-]POT
#2 — Wetland 2
(W2), Sewer Line
PEM
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.003 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W3 E] P ®T
#3 — Wetland 3
(W3), Sewer Line
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.001 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W4 ❑ P ®T
#4 — Wetland 4
(M), Sewer Line
PFO
® Yes
[J No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.269 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W5 []PST
#5 — Wetland 5
(W5), Sewer Line
PEM
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.019 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W6 ❑ P ®T
#6 — Wetland 6
(W6), Sewer Une
PFO
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.003 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W7 ❑ P ®T
#7 — Wetland 7
(W7), Sewer Une
PEM
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.004 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W8 ❑ P ®T
#8 — Wetland 8
(W8), Sewer Une
PEM
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.003 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W9 ❑ P ®T
#9 — Wetland 9
(W9), Sewer Line
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.002 AC
Installation
Wetland Impact
W10 ❑ P ®T
#10 — Wetland 10
(W10), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.019 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W11 []POT
#11 — Wetland 11
(W11), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.034 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W12 ❑ P ®T
#12 — Wetland 12
(W12), Sewer
PFO
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.323 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
® Yes
® Corps
W13 ❑ P ®T
#13 — Wetland 13
PFO
❑ No
®DWQ
0.348 AC
(W13), Sewer Line
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Wetland Impact
W14 ❑ P ®T
#14— Wetland 15
(W15), Sewer
PEM
El Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.029 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W15 ❑ P ®T
#15 — Wetland 16
(W16), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.025 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W16 [:]PET
#16 — Wetland 17
(W17), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.053 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W17 ❑ P ®T
#17 — Wetland 18
(W18), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.040 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W18 [:] P ®T
#18 — Welland 19
(W19), Sewer
PEM
E] Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.008 AC
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W19 ❑ P ®T
#19 — Wetland 21
(W21), Sewer
PEM
❑ Yes
® No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.111 AC
Line Installation
2g. Total wetland impacts
1.82 AC
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Stream Impact #1
— Sewer Line
S1 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Installation
S2 ❑ P ®T
Stream Impact #2
— Sewer Line
S2 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
15-25
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #3
— Sewer Line
S3 — UT Mud
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2-5
20 LF
Installation
S4 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #4
— Sewer Line
S5 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 []PET
Stream Impact #5
— Sewer Line
S6 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S6 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #6
— Sewer Line
S7 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Installation
A Total stream and tributary impacts
120 LF
31. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number-
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P[IT
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
t
i
61. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts for the project are temporary, minimal, and associated only with the installation of the sewer line. Impacts to
approximately 3.421 acres (65%) of wetland and 218 linear feet (64%) of stream will be avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All construction equipment would be operated from high ground. Sediment and erosion control measures and best
management practices would be utilized on-site. Proposed temporary stream impacts would occur in the dry via the use of a
pump around apparatus/system (Figure 3.9).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No *See 4h Below
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to In -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 Linear Feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: The applicant is not proposing to pay compensatory mitigation for the project. The Mud Creek watershed is
Impaired. The proposed project would constitute as and an improvement project for watershed conditions by eliminating
wastewater discharge to impaired waters from a failing treatment plant. Additional documentation is provided in Attachment
C.
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
<1%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project includes installation of a sewer line and temporary impacts that will be revegetated.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Certified Local Government
❑ DWO Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemment's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
El Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) '
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located in a previously developed commercial corridor. The proposed project would not result in
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater would not be generated by the project.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and the Natural Heritage Program GIS data.
CEG consulted the FWS's "Northern Long -Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for Henderson County. The project is not located
near any known occurrences of hibemacula or maternity sites. It is the opinion of CEC that the project would have "no effect" on
the northern long-eared bat. No threatened or endangered species were identified during CEC's field survey on November 28
and November 29, 2017. A copy of CEC's Habitat Assessment, Threatened and Endangered Species Survey report is available
uponrequest
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available on
SHPO's HPOWEB GIS Service. The George D. and Eunice B. Cureton House (HN1912), Hill View Subdivision (HN1911), and
the Mountain Sanitarium (HN1907) are located within a one -mile radius of the project. Sewer line installation will be contained to
the 13 -acre project boundary and it Is the opinion of CEC that project construction will not negatively affect the integrity of these
historic sites.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: WGLA Engineering is coordinating with Henderson County for
approval to work within the 100 -YR floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program. FEMA map number
3700965100.1 and 3700966100J, effective October 2, 2008.
R. Clement Riddle.
p; , �w
3.8.18
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Isprovided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 -
IN
I'll
0
du
.a
a
cc
Mud LreeK Sewer Line (+l- I:5 AU)
Rugby Dr
IN
125;
1
��nti,n:•�,i
�•" c Ol eir
F,t�r
N
z
A
A
NoibrrtRa 4
.,Dr
X
ti
O
Rolling Q`
Puma D,P\,ni:y Ridge
6etrea
o
Legend
—_ Proposed Sewer Easement
Drawn by: KAY 11.14.17; CEC Project# 802
Henderson County,
North Carolina
O�hta,
Rd
o°4hdrrOl
Rd
Of),
IBJS <J\QI£5 erG`� Tulip To
y �a
�dy Naples
1
`t
J'0 O
` '0v
1't o�thel
1��'•, i pjs Pl
r Hilts Rq
04 #
t
1
\
i
N
0
j OldtL�' ti
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Sources: Esri, Del-orme, NQyifiTEO, USGS; NRC N, METI, tPC, TomTom
CLearWater Site Vicinity
Figure 1
32 Clayton Street
Asheville. North Carolina 28801

Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 ACS)
MY -A
•, �. rte: •' 7rai r `��;. ••``••t,li•���) � - — \_ '/.
•' Pay
_ 1 r p n 11
o
7
+ _ f•
_\ •\�� ,teaNap
a
� ` . � ;. • - �� • �, tl?i! ' !(Maples CF�'�� . 1 , � �,� `,,��1` .\ �� ;
Sal
ff
Ay
60 N
r • /,
Legend !
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
11, L_ Proposed Sewer Easement Feet
J
by. `:-\ a) J %� a;QPY If ght� 2 13 Mallo�� r o�ietY d cusg� .�
CLear\Wer USGS Topographic Map
Henderson County, Sk land and Fruitland Quads
North Carolina y
32 Clayton Strcet Figure 2
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Wetland ID Right -of Way Width (ft) Strearn ID
Right -of Way Width (ft)
Wl
40
S1
40
�J*
a
-40 ———— — — — —
—-- — — — — —
I
W2
25
S2
25
tk
I
W3
25
53
25
I O
I
W4
W5
25
25
S4
S5
N/A
25
W LC
LA NWEST
.`
W6
25
56
25
724 5th AVENUE
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
i
I
W7
25
S7
20
(828) 6B7WGLA.
W8
25
OM7
NC LICENSE P-1342
W9
25
;•,-
_ I
wlo
zs
MUD CREEK
Gteeµ
',.`
wil
wlz
25
25
INTERCEPTOR
;
IGURE 1. I
------- ; -- — — —- ----I
wis
zs
I
_-.-.
( I
W14
N/A
I
}` I
W is
25
W16
W17
25
25
HENDERSON COUNTY
�� �,
U-111 I
W18
25
NORTH CAROLINA
'��
W19
25
I
` I
W20
N/A
�
I
=;- --• i' I
W21
25
IGUR 1.1
L- - -
- - - - - - - - T T - _ -
- - - - - - - -. - - - -I
I \
I
Nts
S SEAL
r j �
4,;,�i�••
22989 o•
FH O*ZJ
IGURE. 1.�<<�AM�RO..
��` I
� �
I
�/j/I1111111111
i, \ \ \
I
l•
I
REVISIONS
DALE DESCRIPt10N
I
,�
i
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
I
i
.,
•
1G.URE
1. I
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
I
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
I
'�`, 'r I
K •w,,,be,o„.
calle.r«.youeio.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED ; ' ' I
>"' I
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
I !-_
..
�� I I
DRAWN BY: JWB
..
CHECKED BY: WRB
`
I
WETLAND AND
O PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS 11 I
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
STREAM IMPACTS
I
I
1_—i
OVERVIEW
---
—IGURE
GRAPHIC SCALE
Figure 3.0
�
1
IN pm)
SCALE: 1"= 1000'

�0
r
20
CATAWBA RIVER ROAD
CONNECTION TO \'
EXISTING MANHOLE
�4
4'
lo� I
GRAPHIC SCALE
la►m)
OWNER:
CANE CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
HENDERSON COUNTY
CONTACT: MARCUS JONES, PE
1 HISTORIC COURT HOUSE SQUARE
SUITE 6
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28792
[phone]
Stream Impact #1
S1 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 LF
t Wetland Impact #1
W1 (FORESTED IMPACT)
.517. ACRES
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
O WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
MATCH LINE "A" SEE FIGURE 1.1
WGLA ENGINEERING. PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
ol
0
S
SEAL
22989
/tA Mt
RENSIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
rom
cp
K..6v.". below.
Call Wf—you dlp.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9117
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY. WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.1
SCALE. V= 200'

SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS 0.016 AC TOTAL
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
O PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS 1 WETLAND IMPACTS IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
f
GRAPHIC SCALE
Wetland Impact #2
W2 (LINEAR IMPACT)
0.003 ACRES
it
Wetland Impact #3
W3 (LINEAR IMPACT)
0 001 ACRES
MATCH LINE "A" SEE FIGURE 1.0
K
��;a Wetland Impact #5
.Q_ W5 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
\ 0.019 ACRES
Wetland Impact #6
W6 (FORESTED IMPACT)
tij ti`s;`,\I 0.003 ACRES
,
Wetland Impact #7
`.'.' W7 (LINEAR IMPACT)
0.004 ACRES
.Wetland Impact #8
W8 (LINEA - IMPACT)
1-
`� 0.003 ACRES _ _ ----
A
-j �X --
r 1
¢ Wetland Impact #4
W4 (FORESTED IMPACT)
0.269 ACRES
Stream Impact #2
S2 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 LF
Wetland Impact #9
W9 (LINEAR IMPACT)
0.002 ACRES
MATCH LINE "B" SEE FIGURE 1.2
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE. NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
/
SEAL
22989
GIN'
�A M R�,,Cltt
///111111+ ''lV/IIVV
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIP710N
Know 'r: helow.
Call prom you ala.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9117
DRAWN BY. JWB
CHECKED BY. WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.2
SCALE: 1"= 200'

GRAPHIC SCALE
m m
(IN FM)
Stream Impact #3
S3 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 Ll-
Wetland
F
Wetland Impact #10
W1O (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.019 ACRES
Wetland Impact #11
W11 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.034 ACRES
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
J. PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
OPROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
'
4k
aC
t
Wetland Impact #12
W12 (FORESTED IMPACT)
0.323 ACRES
MATCH LINE "B" SEE FIGURE 1.1
S OLD ASHEVILLE R
(SR 1533)
<- Wetland Impact #13
-
1W13,(FORESTED IMPACT)
48 ACRES
\iii` .; \ � j ., '•
MATCH LINE "C" SEE FIGURE 1.3
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE. NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
- e
°
SEAL
22989 S
%O:�
4 :�G IIJEFsJ �\
.LIQ
REMSIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
omr
005
K.—A.f.b0101N.
CAl edam nu alp.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.3
SCALE. 1"= 20U
.J
MATCH LINE "B" SEE FIGURE 1.1
S OLD ASHEVILLE R
(SR 1533)
<- Wetland Impact #13
-
1W13,(FORESTED IMPACT)
48 ACRES
\iii` .; \ � j ., '•
MATCH LINE "C" SEE FIGURE 1.3
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE. NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
- e
°
SEAL
22989 S
%O:�
4 :�G IIJEFsJ �\
.LIQ
REMSIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
omr
005
K.—A.f.b0101N.
CAl edam nu alp.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.3
SCALE. 1"= 20U

7
Wetland Impact #14
W15 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.029 ACRES
Wetland Impact #15
W16 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.025 ACRES `.
Wetland Impact #16
NkW17 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
Wetland Impact #17 0.053 ACRES
W18 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
Wetland Impact #18 0.040 ACRES
W19 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.008 ACRES
NAL
T
GRAPHIC SCALE
MATCH LINE "C" SEE FIGURE 1..
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
OPROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
''Stream Impact #4
,.
—85 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 LF
✓
Stream Impact #5
S6 (STREAM IMPACT)
J`1 20 LF`
BLUE RIDGE RAILROAD
MATCH LINE "D" SEE FIGURE 1.4
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, INC 28739
[phone]
WGLA COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SEAL
22989
°FNG NEF'Q
A M
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
s
Acp
Know,i, r,bB10W.
Call beton you dlp.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9117
DRAWN BY: jWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.4
SCALE. 1"=200'
1
� f
BLUE RIDGE RAILROAD
MATCH LINE "D" SEE FIGURE 1.4
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, INC 28739
[phone]
WGLA COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SEAL
22989
°FNG NEF'Q
A M
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
s
Acp
Know,i, r,bB10W.
Call beton you dlp.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9117
DRAWN BY: jWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.4
SCALE. 1"=200'

MATCH LINE "D" SEE FIGURE 1.3 & 1.5
SUMMARY 04i -I
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR -
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL).,
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 51h AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
(828) 687a177
wGLA.coM
m
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
Wetland Impact #19 f
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS j � � ' ` �
O WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL) W21 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.111 ACRESX 61
'i
\ f',
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER LINE "C"
r
• „ \ �
� 11 1111 /,,��
_-_ —.•
SEAL
22989
/A M R
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
's
1 \
on
Kmavh ara below.
Hllbolowyoudlp.
PROJECT 17100
\
DATE. 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
m aaa
Figure 3.5
( IN
1=

SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT) i
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR /- =
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY FORESTED -
m WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS]
}. WETLAND IMPACTS (0.338 AC TOTAL)
t r
•� �: `\ � � ' % � ii ',\\` `,t `i ��• � . -/ ` , i // i,. '•ri tip
Stream Impact #6
110 ltt X � LA•M��•.•'IMPACT) �.� �, ` f V, •/ ,r � ./ ! r J � r Q N r."%/..
ZiQ . ,'I_ �'.
I ��� rte, Y�-'�/: •• \�\ � �/Ji"i /%�i%i�. �S, _l �•.'
j , �L`--== _�/t.: `�.j '\ � �,� \ � �', ♦ 1 ,�:i I � fii".,%� i 1�11
r�lj t)I � �;I� �I � f ,r � �. `' ':��\ ;� .-: :', `\ • \ �� `-�`` �' 1 I �! r�r j�j'/. 1` 1—^�"� j rf ,
of / rr � �. I •. r
t
.. �. �Jl1 n �•i'is y/ r// 'r ." " �r - j �..:—� ys �� C � _,. \ \ �`�" ��\\ \ \ \\' `,t,` . �}a`.t 1 � � ' f/J! ,i'
rt111 s r/irw,4% r / ! If i !/ % �"_ �\ �, i +t ••\ .�!��?� , 1t` \. 1 f�/i .
/% ,,��1%�I'} :.L<� /'¢'/ it .._— rf ��� ��i) I�I +r'%�i \\\ `\. \�C' 2\ �i -i-` \ __ `� .\��'••''.{�� •', t� � �:\ -� _ %�J�':
No. d
1
I ( ~J /// /?' c �•' i r J'f Y / i� ���1/I i''. \ { \a ` 5 �, l � t u )1 L ; � �'"
\ 1\,, u�r ) flr��r':
r (I
.� �/��� , +td� s•C' - % ,� - \ � \ i'� � , �l, � � �i�\+ ( I�I"�,I III (;
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
V NX
Ilj/\�i-\ V 1
-/ / _ / rte/ � —` �—•'.�`\\`��\+•f..,�.:�> ✓`. n,__ \
33 r 6r r \\�\\�. 4 •�\
MATCH LINE SEE FIGURE 1.4
GRAPHIC SCALE
(
IN >,K11T
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 51h AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
F � '
°y
SEAL e
22989 %
';�i�°FNciNEFF'�J,j Q,
SAM
/,�/rrrrrllilll`! ��
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTON
Know, below.
Cell below you (go,
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY. WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
Figure 3.6
SCALE: 1"= 200'

NOTE: MATTING SHALL BE COIR FIBER, 750
GRAM PER SQ. METER WITH NOMINAL 0.50 IN.
OPENING SIZE.
TO BE USED FOR MINOR STREAM CROSSING
LOCATIONS
ANCHOR MATTING
IN 8" TRENCH -
1' MIN.
~� MATTING PLACED FLUSH WITH BANK SURFACE,
LAP OVER DOWNSTREAM/DOWN SLOPE SEAMS
-�I—III
1 I 12" WOOD STAKE PLACED IN
3' O.C. DIAMOND PATTERN
ill
STREAM BED
SMOOTH SURFACE, REMOVE ALL
DEBRIS AND SEED/MULCH BEFORE
PLACING MATTING
I�
MATTING ANCHORED/
1' BELOW STREAM BED
III IIi
EXTEND MATTING A MIN. OF
6" BELOW STREAM BED.
DEPTH VARIES
PROPOSED UTILITY
PIPE LINE
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
SEAL
22989 e
C /q M\�
REASONS
DATE DESCRPTION
•
....wNr.blow.
Ca® wa. p. do.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1 /9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
MINOR STREAM
CROSSING DETAIL
Figure 3.7
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

TC
Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
To
s�
To
/To
V,
i
r
1
F lq S
a
`•. %. { .._ i � jam'
LegendCO
�
" .
7 T
Soil f
Co - Codorus loam
Ha
Cu - Comus fine sandy loam
DeA - Delanco loam
EwE - Evard soils : .. _��, iyck N
Ha - Hatboro loam`{
HyC - Hayesville loam
Cu y . r,�
Ko - Kinkora loam ax1" ' •` ..
.- •Y}' 0 500 1,000 2,000
To - Toxaway silt loam Co,�,
Drawn by: BY 12.1.17; CEC Project# 802 Feet
W
NC 0neMap, NC C d
Henderson Coun CLearWaLer USDA Soils Map
p
North Carolina Figure 5
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
I®
Project Boundary
Legend
L ---
_---
� Project Boundary
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
100 -YR Floodplain ,;;.' Feet
Drawn by: KAY 1.18.18; CEC Projea# 802
CLearWater FEMA Floodplain Map
Henderson County. FEMA Map Service Center
North Carolina 32 Clayton Street Map Panel 9651 & 9661
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 6

Attachment A
Parcel Information

Attachment A: Parcel Data
Deed Book/
PIN
Parcel Owner
Page
Parcel Location
Number
9651549693
ANDERS, DAVID L; ANDERS, CATHERINE C
1196/076
5349 ASHEVILLE HWY
9661102876
CLEMENT PAPPAS NC INC
1067/068
483 BROOKSIDE CAMP RD
9651376346
CROYLE, PATRICIA KAY
742/349
68 C LN
9651559260
CUNNINGHAM, ALICE BERTHA HEIRS
250/029
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651651091
FLETCHER FIRE & RESCUE DEPT INC
1159/609
5399 ASHEVILLE HWY
9651646393
GARREN, DON H
1483/501
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651646393
GARREN, DON H
1483/501
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651646393
GARREN, DON H
1483/501
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651646393
GARREN, DON H
1483/501
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651561074
JARVIS, MILDRED C; JARVIS, GEORGE M
799/733
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651556636
JOVEL DUBON, JOSE A; JOVEL UMANZOR,
1593/190
5423 ASHEVILLE HWY
VERONICA P
9651938506
LONDON, SUSAN F; LONDON, EARL R
1377/555
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651726341
MCKINNEY, HAROLD; MCKINNEY, MARY B
846/537
974 5 OLD ASHEVILLE RD
9651726341
MCKINNEY, HAROLD; MCKINNEY, MARY B
846/537
974 S OLD ASHEVILLE RD
9651726341
MCKINNEY, HAROLD; MCKINNEY, MARY B
846/537
974 S OLD ASHEVILLE RD
9651726341
MCKINNEY, HAROLD; MCKINNEY, MARY B
846/537
974 S OLD ASHEVILLE RD
MCKINNEY, HAROLD G LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY,
MARY LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY, RAY; MCKINNEY,
9651639589
ILA; MCKINNEY, KEITH REMAINDERMAN; POWERS,
1609/311
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
KIM REMAINDERMAN; GROFF, KRISTY
REMAINDERMAN
MCKINNEY, HAROLD G LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY,
MARY LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY, RAY; MCKINNEY,
9651733981
ILA; MCKINNEY, KEITH REMAINDERMAN; POWERS,
1609/311
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
KIM REMAINDERMAN; GROFF, KRISTY
REMAINDERMAN
MCKINNEY, HAROLD G LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY,
MARY LIFE ESTATE; MCKINNEY, RAY; MCKINNEY,
9651733981
ILA; MCKINNEY, KEITH REMAINDERMAN; POWERS,
1609/311
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
KIM REMAINDERMAN; GROFF, KRISTY
REMAINDERMAN
MOORE, PIERCE JONES; MOORE, WILLIAM DEAN;
9661146115
MOORE, ROBERT CRUMLEY; MORE, LUCRETIA
5E/291
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
HAZEL; MOORE, DAVID ELDEN

9651460655
MORGAN LEGACY LLC
1173/410
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651469824
MORGAN LEGACY LLC
1015/051
5707 ASHEVILLE HWY
9651476282
MORGAN LEGACY LLC
1173/410
100 CURETON PL
9651296000
NORTH RUGBY PROPERTIES LLC
1518/334
2918 N RUGBY RD
9651383153
RUBIN, STUART I TRUSTEE; STUART I RUBIN
REVOCABLE TRUST; RUBIN, DORIS
1155/380
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9651656004
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE INC A V A CORP
674/011
36 SOUTHERN STATES DR
9651656004
SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE INC A V A CORP
674/011
36 SOUTHERN STATES DR
9661022982
THE LAYMAN FOUNDATION OF NC
234/074
0 NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED
9661130382
THE LAYMAN FOUNDATION OF NC
93A/007
294 PJS PL
9651570488
VANN PROPERTIES LLC
1474/170
5829 ASHEVILLE HWY
9651197761
WINDSOR BUILT HOMES INC
1604/319
2873 N RUGBY RD
9651921626
YAMONT FARMS LLC
1537/047
354 HIGH HILLS RD

,�t.ti�
HENDERSON �S
January 23, 2018
Henderson County Engineering
1 Historic Courthouse Square, Suite 6
Hendersoille, North Carolina 28792
[phone] 1 www.hendersoncountync.org
Subject: Mud Creek Interceptor Project
Cane Creek Water and Sewer District
To Whom It May Concern:
Henderson County and the Cane Creek Water and Sewer District have undertaken the design,
permitting and the proposed construction for the Mud Creek sewer extension project. This
project will connect Fletcher Academy and Park Ridge Hospital to public sewer and allow them
to eliminate their lagoon discharge system. The project will also allow for the abandonment of
two sewer pump stations.
The County has been working with property owners along the route to secure easements for the
construction. They have secured some of the sewer easement with others still in negotiation.
The County has committed to use eminent domain to secure the easements if necessary.
Thank you, and should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 828 694-6560.
Sincerely,
L.
Marcus A. JVggpLeering E.Director of
Mission: To provide a strong value to the Citizens of Henderson County with emphasis on
Safety, Customer Service and the Environment

Attachment B
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Information

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
o1 Engineers.
WdmnglDn Disirict
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
littp•//www.saw.tisace.arnty.mil/Missions/Reau latorvPernt it Program/Contact/CotmtvLocator.asi)x,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number. [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: if you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed bey the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary 1D
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1-26 to North Rugby Rd.
City, State:
Hendersonville
County: Henderson County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
See Attachment B
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: ClearWater Envirnmental Consultants,d
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: 828-698-9800
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
FInterested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
F] Other, please explain.
32 Clayton Street
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Henderson County, attn Marcus Jones
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
1 Historic Courthouse Square
Hendersonville, NC 28792
[phone]
[e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County G15/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION"
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Agent Authorization
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner [:]Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
F] I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 13 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.3975
Longitude: -$2.5130
a✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
✓❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
b Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. littu:llwww.sa%v.usacc.army.mil/Missions/RcLtilatorv-Permil-
P roe ram/1 uri sd i ct i on/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Formg
a Vicinity Map
aAerial Photograph
a USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
W] Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
RV Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
RV/ Other Assessment Forms
7 www saw usace army mil/Portals/59/does/reRudatory/repdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www saw usace army mil/Missions/Reeulatory-Permit-Prop-ram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of.lustice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part ofa public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 1 - REQUEST FOR CORPS JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
To: District Name Here
• I am requesting a JD on property located at: Between 1.26 and N. Rugby Road in Henderson County. NC
(Street Address)
City/Township/Parish: Hendersonville County: Henderson State: NC
Acreage of Parcel/Review Area for JD: -1- 13 AC
Section: Township: Range:
Latitude (decimal degrees): 35.399803 Longitude (decimal degrees): -82.517744
(For linear projects, please include the center point of the proposed alignment.)
• Please attach a survey/plat map and vicinity map identifying location and review area for the JD.
• Icurrently own this property. _ I plan to purchase this property.
I am an agent/consultant acting on behalf of the requestor.
DOther (please explain):
• Reason for request: (check as many as applicable)
I intend to constructidevelop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to
avoid all aquatic resources.
M I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to
avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
QI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require
authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional
a uatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process.
[ZJ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from
the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
D I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is
included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
CMA Corps JD is required in order to obtain my local/state authorization.
177111 intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that
indiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
M Other:
Type of determination being requested:
=I am requesting an approved JD.
I am requesting a preliminary JD.
I am requesting a "no permit required" letter as I believe my proposed activity is not regulated.
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision.
By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agent of a
person or entity with such authority, to and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the
site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that you possess the requisite property
rights to request a JD on the subject property.
'Signature:
Date: 1/19/2018
• Typed or printed name: see Agent Authorization Form
Company name: Cie -Waller Emrionmenlelconsultants, Inc.
Address: 32 claylen street
Asheville, NC 28801
Daytime phone no.: 828.698-8800
Email address: kay®[e-mail]
'Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act,
Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Final Rule for 33 CFR Parts 320332.
Principal Purpose: The Infomtetlon that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project
area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This Information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be
made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction Is to be determined will be included In
the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's webshe and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested Information is voluntary; however, K Information Is riot provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be
issued

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/8/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Hen.—Coum➢•Ana MansJones: t H!sl n Caunhw$e Sque.e,Heneemmvlea NC28792
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Henderson city: Hendersonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.399803 Long.: -82.517744
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 1/19/2018
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 11/28/2017,11/29/2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 101404)
See Attached

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE"
SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Type of aquatic resources
(i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland
waters)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404
WI
1 35.3975
-82.5130
Wetland
3.077
AC
Section 404
W2
35.3953
-82.5108
Wetland
0.003
AC
Section 404
W3
35.3946
-82.5098
Wetland
0.001
AC
Section 404
W4
35.3938
-82.5091
Wetland
0.269
AC
Section 404
W5
35.3955
-82.5069
Wetland
0.019
AC
Section 404
W6
35.3954
-82.5072
Wetland
0.003
AC
Section 404
W7
35.3946
-82.5079
Wetland
0.004
AC
Section 404
W8
35.3938
-82.5084
Wetland
0.003
AC
Section 404
W9
35.3929
-82.5079
Wetland
0.002
AC
Section 404
W10
35.3910
-82.5050
Wetland
0.019
AC
Section 404
W 11
35.3906
-82.5046
Wetland
0.034
AC
Section 404
W12
35.3897
-82.5036
Wetland
0.323
AC
Section 404
W13
35.3889
-82.5012
Wetland
0.698
AC
Section 404
W14
35.3893
-82.4998
1 Wetland
0.005
AC
Section 404
W15
35.3878
-82.5011
Wetland
0.029
AC
Section 404
W16
35.3871
-82.5004
Wetland
0.025
AC
Section 404
W17
35.3868
-82.5000
Wetland
0.053
AC
Section 404
W18
35.3865
-82.4997
Wetland
0.040
AC
Section 404
W19
35.3863
-82.4994
Wetland
0.008
AC
Section 404
W20
35.3867
-82.4986
Wetland
0.515
AC
Section 404
W21
35.3818
-82.4964
Wetland
0.111
AC
Section 404
S1
35.3976
-82.5131
Perennial Stream
221
LF
Section 404
S2
35.3926
-82.5074
Perennial Stream
20
LF
Section 404
S3
35.3914
-82.5055
Perennial Stream
20
LF
Section 404
S4
35.3858
-82.4982
Perennial Stream
57
LF
Section 404
S5
35.3856
-82.4985
Perennial Stream
20
LF
Section 404
S6
35.3850
-82.4978
Perennial Stream
20
LF
Section 404
S7
35.3855
-82.4900
Perennial Stream
22
LF
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑j Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
FEJ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24K; Skyland & Fruitland Quads
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Q Aerial (Name & Date): NCCGIA 2015
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The Information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
Sheet 5A 4 ,�
Sheet 5B -
Potentially Jurisdictonal Water
Wetland AC
Stream LF
W1
3.077
S1
22L4
W2
0.003
S2
20.1
W3
0.001
S3
20.0
W4
0.269
S4
56.8
W5
0.019
S5
20.0
W6
0.003
S6
20.6
W7
0.004
S7
2L9
W8
0.003
W9 0.002
W10 0.019
Wil 0.034
W12 0.323
W13 0.698
W14 0.005
W15 0.029
W16 0.025
W17 0.053
W18 0.040
W19 0.008
W20 0.515
W21 0.111
Total
5.241
Total
338.3
t survey of any data depicted.
Sheet 5C
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
j
Sheet 5E
Legend o '
1,
i Proposed Sewer Easement
Countours "
Linear Wetland IMAL
Stream—
' Sheet 5D
Wetland (Forested) -
- O 0 0.25 0.5 1
Wetland (Herbaceous)
�': •. v � Miles
Drawn by: AKT 11.30.17; CEC Prot '802 x
��• NC Center for Geographic Information & Anal is
Henderson County, CLearWater Stream and Wetland
North Carolina Delineation Map Key
32 Clayton Street Figure 7
Asheville North Carolina 28801

Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
Jurisdictonal Water Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
Potentially
wetland (AC) stream (LF) been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble ^*
-- wl 3.072 sl 221.4 mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
W2 0.003 S2 20.1 subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
\ w3 0.001 S3 20.0 demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
W4 0.269 S4 56.8 cover, and/or multipath signal error.
W5 0.019 S5 20.0
`\ W6 0.003 s6 20.6 Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
- -- fr W7 0.004 57 21.9 approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field;
W8 0.003 however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
w9 0.002 ;� � Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our
W10 0.019 assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only
w11 0.034 agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
W12 0.323 wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
W13 0.698 preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
W14 0.005 verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
w15 0.029 verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
\ W16 0.025 property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
W17 0.053 on this determination.
W18 0.040
W19 0.008 This map was prepared by CEC using the best information
A available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
wzo 0.515 informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
\ W21 0.111
precise boundaries, r w
Total 5.241 Total 338.3 P c e oad ays, property bounds lines, nor legal
''- Potential Non Wetland Waters of the US �-r descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official
surrey of any data depicted
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
S1
W1
> 1
Legend
Proposed Sewer Easement
Countours i 1
Stream / r
Linear Wetland ... r
Potential Wetland Waters of the US _
Wetland (Forested) N
Wetland (Herbaceous) J
Upland Data Form
0 125 250 500
Wetland Data Form 1
W2 7 Feet
Drawn by: AKT 12.8.17; CEC Project# 802 NC'Center for Geographic Information &Analysis
Henderson County, ClearWater Stream and Wetland
North Carolina Delineation Map
32 Clayton Street Figure 7A
Asheville- North Carolina 28801

I
Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
W6\ W5
00
• i
!
W3
Potential Wetland
W4
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
t
W9
Legend
Proposed Sewer Easement
— Countours
Stream
- Linear Wetland
Wetland (Forested)
Wetland (Herbaceous)
Upland Data Form
Wetland Data Form
Drawn by: AKT 12.20.17; CEC Project# 802
Henderson County,
North Carolina
Potential Non -Wetland W
aters of the US 1
/i
Waters of the US
Potentially Jurisdictonal Water
Wetland (AC)
Stream (LF)
W1
1 3.077
Sl 221.4
W2
0.003
S2 20.1
W3
0.001
S3 20.0
W4
0.269
S4 56.8
W5
0.019
S5 20.0
W6
0.003
S6 20.6
W7
0.004
S7 21.9
W8
0.003
W9 0.002
W10 0.019
Wil 0.034
W12 0.323
W13 0.698
W14 0.005
W15 0.029
W16 0.025
W17 0.053
W18 0.040
W19 0.008
W20 0.515
W21 0.111
Total
5.241_
Total 338.3
C�earWater
32 Clayton Street
S3
W10
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble
mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field;
however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our
assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only
agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
on this determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information
availab'e to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official
survey of any data depicted.
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
Potential Wetland Waters of the US y �^
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
NC Center for Geographic Informatiop & Ana ysis
Stream and Wetland
Delineation Map
Figure 7B

r-,
Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
i
Potential Wetland Waters of the US ,
W12
E,
W14
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
W13
W15
f
Jt
Legend
Proposed Sewer Easement
Countours
Stream
Linear Wetland
Wetland (Forested)
kWetland (Herbaceous)
Upland Data Form
Wetland Data Form
Drawn by: AKT 12.20.17; CEC Project# 802
Henderson County,
North Carolina
Potentiall Jurisdictonal Water
Wetland (AC
Stream (LF)
Wl
3.077
Sl
221.4
W2
0.003
S2
20.1
W3
0.001
S3
20.0
W4
0.269
S4
56.8
W5
0.019
S5
20.0
W6
0.003
S6 J
20.6
W7
0.004
S7
21.9
W8
0.003
W9 0.002
W10 0.019
Wil 0.034
W12 0.323
W13 0.698
W14 0.005
W15 0.029
W16 0.025
W17 0.053
W18 0.040
W19 0.008
W20 0.515
w21 0.111
Total
5.241
Total
338.3
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble
mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note. The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field;
however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our
assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only
agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
on this determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information
available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official
surrey of any data depicted.
urce Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
y A W20
i
W17 /
C1- ,� '\
0 125 250 500
W18 W19
r\ Feet
y, NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
CLearWater Stream and Wetland
Delineation Map
32 Clayton Street Figure 7C
Asheville North Carolina 28801

S5
Potentially Jurisdictonal Water
Wetland (AC)
Stream (LF)
W1
3.077
S1
221.4
W2
0.003
S2
20.1
W3
0.001
S3
20.0
W4
0.269
S4
56.8
W5
0.019
S5
20.0
W6
0.003
S6
20.6
W7
0.004
S7
21.9
W8
0.003
W9 0.002
W10 0.019
Wil 0.034
W12 0.323
W13 0.698
W14 0.005
W15 0.029
W16 0.025
W17 0.053
W18 0.040
W19 0.008
W20 0.515
W21 0.111
Total
5.241
Total
r 338.3
Legend
I Proposed Sewer Easement
Countours
--- Stream
Linear Wetland
Wetland (Forested)
Wetland (Herbaceous)
Upland Data Form
Wetland Data Form
Drawn by: AKT 12.6.17; CEC Project# 802
Henderson County,
North Carolina
�z'
/ f
Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
S4 ANW/ /
S6 �
I
'N
Potential Non Wetland Waters of the US
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble
mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may 1
demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative J
cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field;
however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our
assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only
agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
on this determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information
available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official
survey of any data depicted.
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
I W21 I
CLearWater
32 Clayton Street
ille, North Carolina
Potential Non Wetland Waters of the US
NC Center for
hic. information & Analysis
Stream and Wetland
Delineation Map
Figure 7D

Potentially Jurisdictonal Water
Wetland (AC)
Stream (LF)
Wl
3.077
S1
221.4
W2
0.003
S2
20.1
W3
0.001
53
20.0
W4
0.269
S4
56.8
W5
0.019
S5
20.0
W6
0.003
S6
20.6
W7
0.004
S7
21.9
W8
0.003
W9 0.002
W10 0.019
Wil 0.034
W12 0.323
W13 0.698
W14 0.005
W15 0.029
W16 0.025
W17 0.053
W18 0.040
W19 0.008
W20 0.515
W21 0.111
Total
5.241
1 Total
r338.3
S7
Drawn by: AKT
Henderson County,
North Carolina
AMA
Mud Creek Sewer Line (+/- 13 AC)
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble
mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
cover, and/or multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are
approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field -
however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in ot;r
assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is ,he only
agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
on this determination.
I This map was prepared by CEC using the bast information
/ available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
O precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
descriptions. This map shall not be construed to bean official
survey of any data depicted.
\ 0
�. Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US ' �J
C�earWaEer
32 Clayton Street
ille, North Carolim
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
Legend
Proposed Sewer Easement
t-- — J
Countours
---- Stream
Linear Wetland
Wetland (Forested)
Wetland (Herbaceous)
`{ Upland Data Form
Wetland Data Form
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
NC Center for Geographic Information &Anal ysis
Stream and Wetland
Delineation Map
Figure 7E

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson State: NC Sampling Point: W1
Investigator(s): BY 8 AT
Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hiitslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 35.397809262
Long: 82.513533934
Soil Map Unit Name: Kinkora Loam NWI classification: _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I No ❑ (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil 1=1-, or Hydrology ^� significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present?
- Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Q No Is the Sampled Area ^
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes L� No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1 E1 No
Remarks: Community type: Floodplain forest
Wetland W1 representative of W2 and W3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary indicators (minimum of one is reouired• check all that aooN)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Q Drainage Patterns (B10)
© Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim tines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Q Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain In Remarks)
p Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YesNo
Water Table Present? Yes X No
X Depth (inches): 0
Depth (inches): 412
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0-12
wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes r ^ , NoL.�
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), it available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30111 radius ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Befula nigra 50 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2. Fraxinus pennsyivanica 20 Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3, Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC Species Across AN Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (AIB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
8.
90
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 It radius )
1. Ligustrum sinense 30
2. Fraxinus pennsylvsnica 10
3. _
4. _
5.
6. _
7.
B. _
9. _
10.
= Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
3•
FACW species
x 2 =
Yes FACU
FAC species
x3=
Yes FACW
FACU species
x 4 -
12•
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
35 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 fi radius )
1, Microsfeg/urn vimineum 50 Yes FAC
date in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
�
❑ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Lonkera Japonica 15 No FACU
3•
4•
5.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.2811(1 m) tall.
Herb - AM herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 328 A tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
6
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12•
85 = Total Cover
• 30 ft radius
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. )
1.
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
6. Present? Yes 1-77
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wt
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-1 2.5Y 5/2 80%
7.5YR 516 20 C PL
silt loam
1-12 2.5Y 5/2 80%
10YR 4/5 20 C PL
silt loam
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De lelion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils°:
❑ Hislosol (Al)
F1Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MCRA 147, 1 48) [:] Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
HThIn Dark Surface (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
Black Histic (A3)
(S9)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
X❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
[:]Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain In Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbdc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicator; of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) welland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
uniess disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes t ^ t No❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson State: NC Sampling Point: W4- Upland
Investigator(s): BY & AT Section. Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 35.394823567 Long: 82.51021175 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are VegetationX Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Welland? Yes= No�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes =No X
Remarks: Community type: Cropland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Prirnary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aooN1
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B1o)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B15)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain In Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di)
❑ Iron Deposits (85)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
%� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
X Depth
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ Nor—X1
(inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicalor
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Yes FACW
2. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
60 = Total Cover
SaolirwlShnib Stratum (Plot size: 1511 radius )
1. Ligusfrum sinense 30
2. _
3. _
4. _
5. _
6. _
7. _
8. _
9. _
10.
Yes FACU
Sampling Point: W4- Upland
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (AB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by-,
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 -
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius
30 = Total Cover data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
)
50 Y N/q W Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Fest" sp. es
2. Taraxacum sp. 10 No N/A
3 Ary/urn sp. 5 No WA
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
65 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 fl radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: near mowed edge.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ^
Present? Yes = No =X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: W4- Upland
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) %- Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/4 100--°d''-°^.g -'
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
❑ Hlstosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑2 cm Muds (A10) (MLRA 147)
H HLstic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
HThin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)MLRA
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
ISoil disturbed
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ NoQ
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 26, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson Slate: NC Sampling Point: W4
Investigator(s): BY & AT Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lal: 35.393784145 Long: 82.509078999 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? YesE-71 No=
Are Vegetation R, Soil fl, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r X7 No Is the Sampled Area �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes 1 ^ r No=
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes Q No
pa
Remarks: Community type: Floodplain forest
d W4 representative of W5, W6, W7, W8, and W9.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required• check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑X Surface Water (Al)
❑X True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑X High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Pattens (1310)
X1 Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (134)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No
FTIDeplh (inches): t
X Depth (Inches): 0-12
Yes No
%� Depth 0-12
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes L a ' No=
Saturation Present?
(inches):
mdudes capillary e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W4
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stralum (Plot size: 30 h radius ) % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
1, Fraxinus pennsytyanica 40 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2, Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: B3% (AiB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total °% Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
80 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 -
SaoRnolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 it radius )
FACW species x2=
1, Ligustrum sinense 15 Yes FACU
FAC species x3=
2, Cornus amomum 10 Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x5=
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = BfA =
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
B.
®2 -Dominance Test is >5096
9.
3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
10
4. Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
25 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 it radius )
1 Duiichium arundineceum 5 Yes OBL
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophydc Vegetation (Explain)
2, Carex lurdda 5 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 31n. DBH and greater than 3.28 fl (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 fl tail.
12.
10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 it radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
or on a
= Total Cover Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft m
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes r ^ ' No=
= Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: W4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inchesl Color (moist) %.
Redox Features
Color (moistl °% Tvoe Loc,
Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/1 97%
10YR 4/6 3 C PL
silt loam
'T : C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocation: PL -Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soh Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
®Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,
HThin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Hisfic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
[::]Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
© Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (FB)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (SB)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes D No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson State: NC Sampling Point: W11
Invesligator(s): BY & AT
Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N
Lat: 35.390618999
Long: 82.5046381
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification: _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes [—�] No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation —, Soil �' or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present?
J 1
- Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Yes= No�
Are Vegelation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesX No Is the Sampled Area ���
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes 1 ^ t No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Community type: Forbland
Wetland W11 representative of W10. Soccer Field
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (ndnimum of two reguiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that aoolvl
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Q Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Pattems (12110)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
Q Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X❑ Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (134)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
MlDepth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes x No
LxJDepth (inches):
Depth (inches): 0-12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No=
includes capillary tinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 It radius )
1 Juncus cor/aceus 20 Yes FACW
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
3.
4•
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
%Cover Soecies? Status
Number of Dominant Species
7,
1.
9.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2
(A)
2•
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 2
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100%
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total °6 Cover of: Mulliohr by:
B.
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
3-
FAC species x3-
4-
FACU species x4-
2.
2
3
3.
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
4
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7•
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
F-12 -Dominance Test is >5094
9•
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 63.D'
10.
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 It radius )
1 Juncus cor/aceus 20 Yes FACW
MX Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and we8and hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or probiemak.
2• Ranunculus repens 20 Yes FAC
3.
4•
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -Ail herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5.
6
7,
8•
9.
10.
11,
12.
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4,
5.
6.
40 =Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet
Mowed/disturbed vegetation in soccer field
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes' ^ ' Nor
=
Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Roll
Sampling Point: Wii
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 7.5YR 4/2 90 2.5YR 5/8 2 C M silt loam
5YR 4/6 8 C M silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration D=De letion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: YL=core UnIng, M=Maws.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sells':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
®
Histic Eptpedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147, 148)
147,146)
[—]coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Thin Dark Surface (Se) (MLRA
❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils F19)
❑ (
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ P
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
[] Redox Depressions (FB)
p Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Messes (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophy8c vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (SB)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1 ^ I No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProjecUSile: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 26, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson Slate: NC Sampling Point: w12
Investigator(s): BY & AT Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 35.39013005 Long. 82.50405297 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic! hydro) is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F—x--I No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No=
Are Vegetation , Soa R, or Hydrology Fi naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyfic Vegetation Present? Yes r�i ^ No Is the Sampled Area
r -
Hydric Soil Present? Yes !�_^- .1No within a Wetland? Yes l� No�-
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes r ^- ' No
Remarks: Community type: Floodplain forest
Wetland W12
wvnRALnGV
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres an Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mal or Crust (64)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ hon Deposits (B5)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes NoX
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): 0-12
^
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes LJ No=
Includes ca la fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 40 Yes FACW
2. Carpinus caroliniana 25 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
65 - Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 it radius
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanka
)
40
Yes
FACW
2. Comus amomum
3.
4.
15
Yes
FACW
5.
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
6.
7.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1. Carex hAva
55
20
= Total Cover
Yes OBL
2. Leersia oryzoldes
3 Rubus sp.
20
20
Yes
Yes
CBL
NIA
4. Fescue sp.
10
No
N/A
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
(Include photo numbers here or on a
Sampling Point: W12
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86% (AIB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
)( 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophy8c Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tap.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 = Total Cover Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes FX No❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: w12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % _IypeL Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 5YR 3/1 100
silt loam
3-12 5YR 3/1 80
5YR5/8 20 C PL
sill loam
'T e: C=Concentration D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix MS -Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
®Hisk Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (NILRA 147,148) [:]Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
®Thin Surface 147,148) (MLRA 147, 148)
Blade Histic (A3)
Dark (S9) (MLRA
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
[-]Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) welland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (SO)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soft Present? Yes 1 ^ r No❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson County Sampling Dale: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner. Counly of Henderson State: NC Sampling Point: W13
Investigator(s): BY 8 AT Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hitislope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lal: 35.388738548 Long: -82.501592470 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes I No= (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation �, Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes r ^ ' No within a Wetland? Yes EX No=
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes I X I No 4
Remarks: Community type: Floodplain forest
Wetland W13 representative of W14, W15, W16, W17.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Sol Cracks (B6)
X1 Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Q High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Q Drainage Patterns (810)
X❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction to Tiled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X Noepth
(inches): 0-12
Water Table Present? Yes X No
epth (inches): 3-12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
epth (Inches): 0-12
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes' ^ ' No=
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
standing water and saturated soils in linear closed depression
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3011 radius ) ° Cover Species? Status
1. Fraxinus pennsytvanica 45 Yes FACW
2. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius
1. Acer negundo
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
g.
10.
10 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
Sampling Point: W13
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
MuItiDH bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 -
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
E] 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
© 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
p 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 it radius )
1 5 Yes OBL ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)Carex k#Ma
2. Fescue sp. 5 Yes N/A
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, exduding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes 1.=J Nor -7
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: W13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5YR 4/3 100 silt loam
5-12 7.5YR 5/1 60 2.5YR 3/6 40 C M silt loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (AID) (MLRA 147)
O Histic Epipedon (A2)
]Black
® Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
O Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Suicide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
❑ StralKed Layers (A5)
[Xj Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
[] Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
❑ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (55)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yost ^ r No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Sile: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/Counly: Henderson County Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson Slate: NC Sampling Point: W20- Upland
Investigator(s): BY 8 AT Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 35.387337977 Long: 82.496873156 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes r X7 No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology sign cantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes�No=
f�f
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyfic Vegetation Present? Yes Q No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes= Not
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Q No X
Remarks: Community type: Cropland
Actively farmed corn field and gravel road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (81)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (86)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundalion Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YesNo
X Depth (inches):
No
Water Table Present? YesPNoL_2�jDepIh
X Depth (inches):
^
Hydrology Present? Yes= Nor-71
Saturation Present? Yes
pnches):
Wetland
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Inlerlm Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W20• Upland
Tree Stralum (Plot size: 30 it radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 It radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x4=
3
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
5.
Prevalence Index = BIA =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
E]8 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is -5o%
9•
n 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
10.
4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
El=Total data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation (Explain)
Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius )
1 • Zee mays 30 Yes NIA
2• Festuca SP
20 No NIA
Indicators of hydric sotl and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3• Trilopum repens 5 No FACU
4•
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7,
height.
6'
SaplingfShrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tail.
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.2811 in
height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
55 =Total Cover
1,
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
Vegetation
Present? Yes = NoQ
6
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: near mowed edge.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

�Zfi716
Sampling Point: W20- Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-11 5YR 4/4 100 gravel loam
1-12 5YR 5/8 50 5YR 5/3 50 M gravel loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
®Histic Epipedon (A2)
® Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Histic (A3)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loa Gle Matrix (F2)
[3 Loamy Y�
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Q Stratified Layers (A5)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
E:]eP
❑ Redox Dark Surface (176)
(MLRA 136,147)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 147,148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
weftand hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Idisturbed fill
Hydric Soft Present? Yes ❑ Nor—xi
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line City/County: Henderson Counly Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
Applicant/Owner: County or Henderson Slate: NC Sampling Point: W20
Investigator(s): BY 8 AT
Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N
Let: 35.386429240
Long: -82.498447946
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus Loam NWI classification: _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E] No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation II
FX], Soil . or Hydrology ;q significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
L.1
- Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Yes= Not
Are Vegetaifon , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes 1 ^ 1 No=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Community type: Cropland
Wetland W20 representative of W18, and W19. Actively farmed corn field with high water table and
man made ditches for drainage.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reoulred)
Primar • Indicators (minimum of one Is reoulred•
check all that aooly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Q Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -season water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
© Recent Iron Reduction It Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
© Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
© Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
© Algal Mat or Crust (84)❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (03)
XO Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (04)
© Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
No
Water Table Present? YesNo
Surface Water Present? YesfflX
Depth (inches): 24
Depth (inches): 0-12
Saturation Present? YesNo
epth (inches): 0-12
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes rX No❑
includes capillary hinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks:
Wetland includes man made ditches in cornfield
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Slralum (Plot size: 30 it radius )
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: W20
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius )
1. Acer negundo 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophy is Vegetation
8.
❑ 2 -Dominance Test is >50°!.
9.F13 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10 2 =Total Cover ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5 It radius data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Zea mays 40 YWA
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tap.
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ NoQ
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: actively managed agricultural row crops in corn. Data point taken near
man-made drainage ditch which is actively managed/mowed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Total % Cover of'. Multiply by:
es
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
No OBL
3. Rumex crispus
FACW species x 2 n
No FAC
FAC species x 3 =
5
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
S.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tap.
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ NoQ
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: actively managed agricultural row crops in corn. Data point taken near
man-made drainage ditch which is actively managed/mowed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
es
2. Peltandra virgfnica
5
No OBL
3. Rumex crispus
5
No FAC
4. Leersia oryzoldes
5
No OBL
S.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
55
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tap.
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ NoQ
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: actively managed agricultural row crops in corn. Data point taken near
man-made drainage ditch which is actively managed/mowed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point:W2o
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type'Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 5YR 2.511 100 silt loam
2-12 7.5YR 3/1 75 5YR 2.511 25 D M slit loam
�T.. _r• .., e.,�.��z.,., n=no.aonr n RM=Redured Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
®Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
®Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Histk (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Q Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)MLRA
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
136)
QX Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Pledmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Soil tilled for row crops
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:802- Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line Cit /Cty' Henderson County Sampling Date: November 28, 2017
p youn
Applicant/Owner: County of Henderson State: NC Sampling Point: W21
Investigator(s): BY 8 AT
Section, Township, Range: Naples
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _LRR N
Let: 35.381606514
Long: -82.496273106
Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cornus fine sandy loam WA classification:
Are climatic / hydroo/logic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X ,Soil x , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ❑ No
EZI
Are Vegetation. I I, Soil � or Hydrology Finaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
_�� J.L��
cl IUUARV nF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes G= NoQ Is the Sampled Area �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes L^ L NoQ
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes L.=i NoB
Remarks: Community type: Cropland
Actively farmed corn field with high water table and man made ditches for drainage.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
❑ Surface Water (Al)
check all that 8012M
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑X Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized RNzospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (81)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sob (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain In Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B6)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquiterd (133)
❑
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
X❑ Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (136)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
cKlepth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes X No
X Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Wet�� �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r ^ ' Nor
(includes ca Ila fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial ptwtos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W21
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 It radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 It radius )
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
1. Zea mays
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
4.
FACU species x 4 -
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
height.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
g,
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
= Total Cover
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 It radius )
©Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1. Zea mays
50 Yes N/A
2, Ranuncukrs repens
10 No FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or
6•
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
B.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
12.3
2 ft
60 =Total Cover Woody vine -All woody vines greater than
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) height.
1.
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
6 Present? Yes D NoQ
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is problematic: actively managed agricultural row crops in corn.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Profile
to the depth needed to
Sampling Point: W21
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-12 5Y 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C PL sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Q Hislosol (A1)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) (MLRA 147)
®Hislic
Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
HThIn Dark Surface 147,148)
[:]Coast Prairie Redox (All 6)
(MLRA 147,148)
Black Histic (A3)
(S9) (MLRA
Q Hydrogen sulfide (A4)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Q Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Q Sandy Redox (S5)
Q Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Q Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (H observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Soil disturbed from tilling.
Hydric Soli Present? Yes F -x-1 NoQ
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

Attachment C
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission — Special
Order by Consent
Necessity Narrative & Supporting Documentation

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HENDERSON
IN THE MATTER OF )
NORTH CAROLINA ) SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
NPDES PERMIT NC0036641 ) EMC WQ S17-006
HELD BY FLETCHER ACADEMY, INC.)
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.2, this Special Order by
Consent is entered into by Fletcher Academy, Inc. and the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and
hereinafter referred to as the Commission:
1. Fletcher Academy, Inc. (hereinafter the Permittee) and the Commission hereby stipulate the
following:
(a) That the Permittee holds North Carolina NPDES Permit NC0036641 for operation of
an existing wastewater treatment works at the Fletcher Academy WWTP and for
making an outlet therefrom for treated wastewater to Byers Creek, currently classified
C waters of this State in the French Broad River Basin. The Permittee is unable to
comply with the final effluent limitations for BOD -5 day and NH3-N set forth in the
Permit. Compliance has not been achieved by implementation of numerous changes
to plant operation and maintenance, elimination of some contributing sources, and
other attempts to respond to NC DEQ technical assistance visits. Compliance requires
closure of the existing wastewater treatment works, connection to the Cane
Creek/Henderson County municipal sewer via the proposed Mud Creek Interceptor
Project, and a request for rescission of permit NC0036641. Construction of the Mud
Creek Interceptor Project will be facilitated by the Memorandum of Agreement
between The Cane Creek Water and Sewer District (CCW&SD) and the Permittee
signed on December 5, 2016.
(b) That noncompliance with final effluent limitations constitutes causing and
contributing to pollution of the waters of this State named above, and the Permittee is
within the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) That CCW&SD has adequate financing for completion of the construction of the Mud
Creek Interceptor for conveyance of wastewater from the existing wastewater
treatment works at the Fletcher Academy WWTP to the sewer owned and operated
by CCW&SD and ultimately sewer and wastewater treatment facilities owned and
operated by the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County (MSD).
(d) That CCW&SD has secured approval from MSD to utilize any sewer conveyance
system and treatment facilities required to treat all flow currently treated by the

SOC WQ S 17-006
existing wastewater treatment works at the Fletcher Academy W WTP.
(e) Since this Special Order is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a contested
case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
2. The Permittee, desiring to comply with the permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above, hereby
agrees to do the following:
(a) Comply with all terms and conditions of the permit except those effluent limitations
identified in paragraph 1(a) above. See attachment A for all current monitoring
requirements and effluent limitations. The permittee may also be required to monitor
for other parameters as deemed necessary by the Director in future permits or
administrative letters.
(b) Undertake the following activities in accordance with the indicated time schedule:
1) The following activities shall be started no later than June 30, 2018:
• Begin construction of Mud Creek Interceptor project.
2) The following activities shall be started no later than December 31, 2019:
■ Cease operation of the existing wastewater treatment works at the Fletcher
Academy WWTP.
■ Connect to the proposed Mud Creek Interceptor and begin discharge of all
effluent via the municipal sewer.
■ Within 90 days of connection with the proposed Mud Creek Interceptor,
work with the DEQ Asheville Regional office to sample remaining lagoon
sludge per DEQ protocol and dispose of or leave in place as appropriate.
Complete closure of the lagoon within 90 days of approval by DEQ
Asheville Regional Office of closure plan.
3) Submit Progress reports no later than 14 calendar days after any date identified
in 2(b)(1-2) to the Director of DWO indicating compliance or noncompliance
therewith In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement
of the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
(c) During the time in which this Special Order by Consent is effective, comply with the
interim effluent limitations contained in Attachment A. Under this Special Order of
Consent, only the parameters listed below have been modified from the most
current NPDES Permit in effect. The following reflects only the limitations that
have been modified from NPDES requirements by this Order:
Page 2 of 4

SOC WQ S17-006
(d) As a settlement of all unresolved enforcement cases for NPDES Permit NCO036641
prior to entering into this Special Order by Consent, the Permittee agrees to pay the
sum of $5,974.04. A certified check must accompany the signed copy of the SOC.
The check should be made payable to the NC Department of Environmental Quality
and mailed (with signed copy of the SOC) to the Director of DWR at 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.
3. The Permittee agrees that unless excused under paragraph 4, the Permittee shall pay the
Director, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
according to the following schedule for failure to meet the deadlines outlined in Section
2(b)(1-3) or failure to attain compliance with the effluent limitations/monitoring requirements
contained in Attachment A.
SOC violation
Stipulated Penalty
Permit Limits
Modified Limits (SOC)
Parameter
Units
Monthly Avg Daily Max
Monthly Avg Daily Max
BOD -5 day
mg/L
30.0 45.0
70.0 100.0
NH3-N (Summer)
mg/L
3.8 19.0
10.0 24.0
NH3-N (Winter)
mg/L
11.0 35.0
20.0 35.0
(d) As a settlement of all unresolved enforcement cases for NPDES Permit NCO036641
prior to entering into this Special Order by Consent, the Permittee agrees to pay the
sum of $5,974.04. A certified check must accompany the signed copy of the SOC.
The check should be made payable to the NC Department of Environmental Quality
and mailed (with signed copy of the SOC) to the Director of DWR at 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.
3. The Permittee agrees that unless excused under paragraph 4, the Permittee shall pay the
Director, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
according to the following schedule for failure to meet the deadlines outlined in Section
2(b)(1-3) or failure to attain compliance with the effluent limitations/monitoring requirements
contained in Attachment A.
SOC violation
Stipulated Penalty
Failure to meet a schedule date
$100/day for the first 7 days;
$500/day thereafter
Failure to maintain compliance with any
$1000/violation
modified limit contained in the SOC.
Failure to achieve compliance with
Single monetary value of $2000.00
effluent limits at final compliance
deadline
Monitoring frequency violations
$1000.00 per omitted value per parameter
Failure to submit progress reports
$100/day for the fust 7 days;
$2501day thereafter
4. The Permittee and the Commission agree that the stipulated penalties are not due if the
Permittee satisfies the Division that noncompliance was caused solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
C. An intentional act or omission of a third party. This defense shall not be available if
the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the Permittee, or if the act or
omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship with the Permittee;
d. An extraordinary event beyond the Permittee's control. Contractor delays or failure
to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the Permittee's control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Page 3 of 4

SOC WQ S 17-006
Failure within 30 days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or challenge them by
a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds for a collection action,
which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate. The only issue in such an action
will be whether the 30 days has elapsed.
5. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Order by Consent is subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulations, including injunctive relief pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6.
6. This Special Order by Consent and any terms, conditions and interim effluent limitations
contained herein, hereby supersede any and all previous Special Orders issued in connection
with NPDES Permit NC0036641. .
7. The Permittee, upon signature of the Special Order by Consent, will be expected to comply
with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Order by Consent shall expire on February 1, 2020.
For Fletcher Academy, Inc.
(Print Name of Signing Official) (Signature of Signing Official)
Date
(Title)
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
Chair of the Commission
Page 4 of 4
Date

Necessity Narrative & Supporting
Documentation
FOR
Fletcher Academy, Inc.
SOC Application
HENDERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CAR
` � -40 q
22989
:zu
1 SAMTA. 13 - 13
PREPARED BY:
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
214 N. KING STREET
HENDERSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28792
April 2017

Fletcher Academy
Necessity Narrative
Introduction:
Fletcher Academy Incorporated (FAI) operates and maintains a wastewater treatment
facility in northern Henderson County that operates under permit number (NC
0036641). The treatment facility is an aerated lagoon system with chlorination and
dechlorination systems at the discharge location.
Over the past several years, Fletcher Academy has had difficulty meeting the permitted
discharge limits. Specifically, the facility has received notices of violation and
assessments for civil penalties for failure to meet BOD and NH3 discharge limits. These
violations have occurred despite the best efforts of FAI to operation the facility as
efficiently as possible. Some of these efforts have included the removal of the Fletcher
Academy laundry, installation of a dechlorination system on the influent side of the
lagoon, removal of sludge from the lagoon and numerous other activities recommended
through NCDEQ technical assistance visits. The conclusion is that the lagoon facility
simply not able to meet the discharge limits due to dated technology.
In 2015, FAI began the process of investigating alternatives for wastewater treatment
and disposal. Over the course of several months, it was determined that the best long
term solution was to abandon the lagoon and connect to the Cane Creek Water and
Sewer District sewer system located approximately 2 miles away.
FAI and Cane Creek/Henderson County recently executed an agreement for the
extension of the Cane Creek sewer system to the FAI property. A copy of that
agreement is attached with this document.
The connection to the Cane Creek system will eliminate the discharge from the FAI
lagoon and will allow for the abandonment and decommissioning of the facility. The
Cane Creek sewer collection system connects to the Metropolitan Sewer District of
Buncombe County system for final treatment and discharge at the treatment facility in
Woodfin.
Necessity:
Based on the efforts of FAI to operate the treatment facility as efficiently as possible, it
is realistic to believe that future violations of the permit limits of BOD and NH3 will
continue to occur. Since the existing process utilizes a lagoon and floating aerators for
treatment, there are limited options to optimize the treatment process. In the past FAI
has re -circulated effluent from pre -chlorination back to cell #I in the lagoon. This has
helped to reduce BOD levels in the effluent.
Fletcher Academy has undertaken the following efforts to improve the operation of the
facility:
Fletcher Academy Necessity Narrative
Page 1

-Elimination of the laundry on the Fletcher Academy campus thereby reducing flow to
the treatment facility by approximately 10,000 — 15,000 GPD and eliminating the
possibility of toxic discharges to the sewer system. This was completed on July I, 2015.
-A dechlorination tablet feeder system was installed at the influent phase of the sewer
system before discharge to the lagoon. This was installed in June 2014.
- Monitoring in the lagoon of COD/BOD began in June, 2009 to allow for an adjustment
of effluent discharge levels facilitating improved BOD discharge levels.
- Elimination of possible toxic chemical discharges from the Aquatics facility at the Lelia
Patterson Center by preventing accidental discharges from entering the floor drains and
ultimately into the sanitary sewer system.
-Continued education and outreach with Park Ridge Health and all sewer users for the
elimination of any toxic substances discharged to the sewer system (ongoing).
-Various repairs to the sewer collection system to help improve the quality of the
influent wastewater to the treatment plant. Many of these repairs included discontinuing
obsolete terracotta piping that was subject to infiltration and stagnate conditions as a
result of age and poor manhole construction.
-During the past several years FAI staff has met with Fred Sommers of the NCRWA as
well as Don Price with DWQ and held Technical Assistance visits (TAs) TA with the
Morrisville Regional Office. As result of their recommendations FAI has installed a 2000
gallon aerated holding tank at the laundry, installed an additional 15 HP floating aerator
in cell # I, replaced all three floating curtains between cells I and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4,
and dredged excessive sludge from cells 3 and 4 several times. Virtually all
recommendations from past TA's have been completed.
Selected Alternative for Wastewater Treatment and Disposal:
As noted earlier, FAI has entered into an agreement with Henderson County and the
Cane Creek Water and Sewer District to extend the public sewer system to the FAI
site. The sewer system will be extended approximately two miles to the site and when
completed will connect to the FAI sewer collection system upstream of the existing
lagoon. At that time, all wastewater from FAI (and associated facilities) will be collected
through the public sewer system and transported to the MSD of Buncombe County
WWTP for treatment and disposal.
Based on the agreement, FAI will contribute to the cost of the extension of the Cane
Creek sewer collection system. The extension is currently scheduled to be designed,
permitted, constructed and placed into operation on or before December 31, 2019. At
that time, FAI will cease to discharge new wastewater to the lagoon treatment system.
Fletcher Academy Necessity Narrative
Page 2

Once the new collection system is operational and FAI is no longer discharging to the
lagoon, FAI will begin the process of the lagoon closure. FAI will follow the NCDEQ
Guidelines for the Closure of Permitted Wastewater- Ponds and Lagoons.
Prior to connection to the Cane Creek Sewer System, FAI will sample the lagoon
wastewater in accordance with the permit conditions. FAI will work with NCDEQ and
the Cane Creek Water and Sewer District to dewater the lagoon by discharging to the
new sewer system or through a pump and haul permit issued by DEQ. Once
dewatered, FAI will sample the remaining sludge per DEQ protocol. Following testing,
FAI will work with DEQ to dispose of the sludge by either leaving in place or by land
application.
FAI will work with the Asheville Regional Office during lagoon closure process. The
schedule for the final closure will be established during the sampling and testing process
listed above.
Certification:
As noted above, the FAI treatment system is operating as efficiently as possible under
the guidance of James and James Environmental. FAI has incorporated and acted on all
recommendations provided during NCDEQ technical assistance inspections and by
various consultants. Based on this, it is our opinion that the FAI treatment system
cannot be operated in a manner that would achieve compliance with the final permit
limits.
We believe the FAI treatment system could be expected to meet the following effluent
limits if the system is operated at maximum efficiency:
Recommended Effluent Limits as follows:
TSS — Same
Fecal Coliform — Same
BOD — 75 mg/I
NH3 — winter — 20 mg/I
- Summer — 10 mg/l
Or 20 mg/I all year
Fletcher Academy Necessity Narrative
Page 3