The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20180451 Ver 1_401 Application_20180318Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions SAW – 201 Ͳ BEGIN DATE [Received Date]: Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORM 1.Project Name [PCN FŽƌm A2a]: 2.Work Type: Private Institutional Government Commercial 3.Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]: 4.Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: 5.Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 – or ORM Consultant ID Number]: 6.Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: 7.Project Location - Coordinates͕^ƚƌĞĞƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌ>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ[PCN Form B1b]: 8.Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 9.Project Location – County [PCN Form A2b]: 10.Project Location – Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: 11.Project Information – Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: ϭϮ͘tĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚͬϴͲŝŐŝƚ,ǇĚƌŽůŽŐŝĐhŶŝƚŽĚĞ΀WE&ŽƌŵϮĐ΁͗ Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Section 10 & 404 Regulatory Action Type: Standard Permit Nationwide Permit # Regional General Permit # Jurisdictional Determination Request Pre-Application Request Unauthorized ĐƚŝǀŝƚǇ Compliance EŽWĞƌŵŝƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ Revised 20150602 S&ME, Inc. | 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard | Charlotte, NC 28273 | p 704.523.4726 | f 704.525.3953 | www.smeinc.com March 26, 2018 US Army Corp of Engineers US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 Attention: Mr. Bryan Roden-Reynolds N.C. Division of Water Resources 401 Wetlands & Buffer Permitting Branch 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins Reference: Application for Nationwide Permit No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7435-17-015 Dear Mr. Reynolds and Ms. Higgins: On behalf of our client, Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this application for impacts to Waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 4133. The proposed project will involve installation of approximately 8.4 miles of natural gas transmission pipeline. This Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval, and complies with all applicable conditions of NWP No. 12. In support of this application, please find enclosed the following: Figures: Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1), N.C. USGS Topographic Quad Sheets (Figures 2-3), and 2014 Aerial Photographs Exhibits (Figures 4-9). Appendix I: Jurisdictional Delineation Information Appendix II: Site Photographs Appendix III: Completed PCN, Impact Tables and Authorization to Act as Agent Appendix IV: Impact Drawings (Figures 10 through 42) Appendix V: Typical Stream and Wetland Involvement Details Appendix VI: Agency Scoping Responses Appendix VII: Restoration Plan Appendix VIII: Mitigation Credit Acceptance Letter Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) is also required because the proposed project will not cross all stream channels at a near perpendicular angle, greater than 500 liner feet of temporary stream impacts will occur, and the combined width of the permanent and temporary construction will exceed 50 feet in order to safely accommodate construction. Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 2 General Project Information PNG is planning to install a segment of steel natural gas transmission pipeline in Forsyth County. The new pipe is approximately 8.4 miles in length, and a majority will be installed within and adjacent to an existing natural gas pipeline. The project begins at an existing station located on the north side of Hammock Farm Road in Winston-Salem (36.159299°N, -80.180819°) and end on the west side of North Main Street in Kernersville (36.131423°N, -80.056064°W). The purpose of the project is to “loop” the aforementioned 8.4-mile segment of their existing Line 328 transmission pipeline, thereby creating additional capacity and strengthening reliability of the system for the service area. The general project location is depicted on the Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1). The project vicinity consists primarily of a mixture of commercial/residential/industrial development, along with undeveloped wooded areas. The project will cross multiple parcels. Of these, PNG has either acquired easement agreements or initiated condemnation proceedings. The location of the project corridor is depicted in greater detail on the appropriate U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map exhibits (Figures 2-3). Approximately 47 percent of the project is located in the Upper Yadkin watershed (HUC 03040101), while the remaining 53 percent is located in the Roanoke watershed (HUC 03010103). Typical conditions within the project area include the existing, maintained utility easement, stabilized disturbance areas associated with existing road rights-of-way or maintained lawns, mature hardwood and pine forest, and successional forest. Several areas have been recently logged, or consist of habitat types and in varying successional stages. Description of the Proposed Work A majority of the pipeline (approximately 81 percent) will be installed with PNG’s existing 50-foot wide easement, 5 feet from the edge of the easement in order to maintain 20 feet of separation from the existing pipe. In such areas, an additional 20-foot permanent easement will be acquired directly adjacent to the existing easement in order to maintain adequate distance between the new pipe and the edge of the easement. In portions of the project that will not parallel the existing easement, a new 50-foot wide permanent easement will be acquired. In general, temporary workspace sufficient to provide a combined 100-foot wide construction corridor will be utilized in high ground areas. The width of the combined temporary and permanent easements will be reduced to 70 feet at wetland and stream crossings. Justification for the additional requested workspace in wetland areas and stream crossing is provided in the Avoidance and Minimization section of this letter. Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces, etc. At the wetland crossing, efforts will be made to remove surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary, temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one side of the easement to facilitate equipment passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control (E&SC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features. No grubbing or below-ground vegetation removal will occur within wetland areas or along stream banks, except within the trench line or as needed for safety purposes, where stump removal or light grading may Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 3 be necessary to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably-level work surface. Within the wetland area where extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur, timber mats will be placed to provide work and travel space for equipment. Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures, the trench will be excavated along the “non-working” side of the easement. The work will be performed from the timber mats placed along the working side of the easement. In certain areas, including the wetland, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water. Lengths of the new pipe will be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments will be heat-welded together, inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be “cleaned up” by rough-grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre-disturbance contours and conditions. All work within the wetland and at stream crossings will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help prevent siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Areas S&ME visited the project area on multiple occasions ranging from April through August, 2017 to delineate jurisdictional features located therein. S&ME followed the procedures set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Supplemental Guidance. Field conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. The field review also included identification of tributaries (streams or jurisdictional ditches) within the project area. Drainage features identified during the field review were assessed to determine the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features were classified as either non-jurisdictional or jurisdictional. S&ME used the NCDWR Stream Classification Form to document characteristics of identified drainage features on the day of the assessment. During the site visit, the boundaries of regulated surface waters were demarcated using sequentially-numbered flagging. The location of the jurisdictional features is depicted on Figures 4-9. Information relating to the jurisdictional delineation is included in Appendix I, and photographs of the subject features are included in Appendix II. Multiple jurisdictional features were identified within the proposed project area during the site visit. Sixteen perennial streams and three intermittent streams will be temporarily affected. In addition, fifteen wetland areas will be temporarily affected. A majority of the wetlands are classified as headwater wetlands or bottomland hardwood swamps. A portion of one of the wetlands is classified as a seep, and another as a freshwater marsh. Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 4 Table 1: Summary of Stream and Wetland Impacts Stream Impacts Stream ID Impact Map # Flow Regime Temp Impact (lf) Perm Impact (lf) S2 10 Perennial 164 0 S4 - Frazier Creek 11 Perennial 67 0 S6 12 Perennial 79 0 S5 - Lowery Mill Creek 13 Perennial 156 0 S7 14 Perennial 276 0 S11 Martin Mill Creek 15 Perennial 27 0 S15 16 Intermittent 65 0 S17 17 Perennial 89 0 S18 - Belews Creek 18 Perennial 101 0 S19 19 Perennial 66 0 S20 20 Intermittent 26 0 S21 21 Perennial 58 0 S24 22 Perennial 101 0 S25 23 Perennial 67 0 S26 24 Perennial 154 0 S28 - E Belews Creek 25 Perennial 66 0 S29 26 Perennial 75 0 S30 27 Perennial 245 0 1,882 0 Wetland Impacts Wetland ID Impact Map # WAM Class Temp Impacts (ac) Perm Impacts (ac) WB 28 Headwater Wetland 0.063 0.021 WD 29 Headwater Wetland 0.000 0.066 WF 30 Headwater Wetland 0.013 0.044 WL 31 Headwater Wetland 0.046 0.007 WM 32 Bottomland Hardwood 0.091 0.048 WN 33 Headwater Wetland 0.004 0.000 WQ 34 Headwater Wetland 0.094 0.000 WR 35 Headwater Wetland 0.069 0.000 WS 36 Headwater Wetland 0.073 0.035 WTa 37 Seep 0.155 0.025 WTb 38 Bottomland Hardwood 0.313 0.136 WU 39 Headwater Wetland 0.109 0.061 WV 40 Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh 0.099 0.000 WW 41 Headwater Wetland 0.021 0.005 WX 42 Headwater Wetland 0.058 0.016 1.208 0.464 Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 5 A completed PCN form is included in Appendix III. The proposed project may temporarily affect approximately up to 1,882 lf of tributary waters and 1.208 acre of wetlands. In addition, 0.464 acre of forested wetland will be converted to herbaceous wetlands. Conventional isolation and excavation pipe installation methodologies are proposed for this project. Accordingly, the stream impacts will result from installation of a new pipe and/or construction of a temporary equipment crossing. Impacts to wetlands will result from conventional pipe installation. Drawings depicting each proposed stream and wetland crossing are included in Appendix IV, and typical plan and cross-sectional views are included in Appendix V. Following construction, the temporarily affected jurisdictional areas will be returned to their pre-construction grade and contour, seeded, and stabilized. Protected Species To assist you with determining the project’s compliance with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), S&ME first reviewed the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Raleigh Ecological Field Office lists to identify occurrences of federally protected species that may be documented in Forsyth County. The complete list of federally-protected species for Forsyth County are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Federally-Protected Species Summary Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status County Status Glyptemys muhlenbergii Bog Turtle T (S/A) Current Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long-eared Bat T Probable/Potential Cardamine micranthera Small-anthered Bittercress E Historic E =Endangered; T = Threatened; T(S/A) = Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance S&ME conducted a review of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data explorer for records of rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within one mile of the project boundary. The NCNHP database did not identify records of federally protected species within one mile of the project route. On August 30, 2017, S&ME provided project information to the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) requesting that they review records that may have relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, protected/managed lands, conservation easements or high quality natural communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide recommendations and comments. The WRC responded with a September 5, 2017 letter stating that they had no records of federally or state-listed species within or adjacent to the route, but indicated that the FWS lists the small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera) and northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as having potential to occur within the project area if suitable habitat is present. The FWS responded with an October 17, 2017 letter confirming that the project corridor may contain suitable habitat for northern long-eared bat. However, the FWS also stated that the nearest known maternity roost or hibernacula site is over 45 miles away, and that there is a large amount of suitable habitat in close proximity to the site. Accordingly, the FWS believes that the probability of “take” that could occur from this project is discountable. The FWS did recommend that a tree-cutting moratorium of Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 6 June 1-July 31 be implemented into the plans if possible. However, based on the proposed project schedule, complete avoidance of tree cutting operations during the moratorium is not practicable. The FWS went on to state that they believed the project will have “no effect” on all other federally listed species known to occur in Forsyth County, and that the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. Provided below are brief descriptions of the federally-protected species listed for Forsyth County, and our conclusion of the project’s potential effect on each. Bog Turtle Status: Federally-Listed Threatened (S/A) Biological Conclusion: No Effect Characteristics of this small turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) include a light brown to black carapace (may have yellowish or reddish areas on large scutes), strongly sculptured with growth lines, and an inconspicuous keel. The plastron is mainly dark brown to black, the head is brown, with a large yellow or orange (sometimes red) blotch above and behind the tympanum (blotch may be divided). The adult carapace length is usually is three to 3.5 inches. The male vent is posterior to the rear edge of the carapace and the plastron is concave (flat in female). Bog turtle differs from the spotted turtle (a few of which lack yellow dots on the carapace) by having a large orange patch on each side of the head rather than many small yellow or orange spots on the head and neck; also, the bog turtle has prominent growth lines on the carapace (most, but not all, spotted turtles have a smooth carapace). Bog turtles inhabit slow, shallow, muck-bottomed rivulets of sphagnum bogs, calcareous fens, marshy/sedge-tussock meadows, spring seeps, wet cow pastures, and shrub swamps; the habitat usually contains an abundance of sedges or mossy cover. The turtles depend on a mosaic of microhabitats for foraging, nesting, basking, hibernation, and shelter. Unfragmented riparian systems that are sufficiently dynamic to allow the natural creation of open habitat are needed to compensate for ecological succession. Beaver, deer, and cattle may be instrumental in maintaining the essential open-canopy wetlands. Bog turtles commonly bask on tussocks in the morning in spring and early summer. They burrow into soft substrate of waterways, crawl under sedge tussocks, or enter muskrat burrows during periods of inactivity in summer. Although the project corridor contains potentially-suitable habitat for bog turtle, no individuals of this species were observed. Species that are threatened due to similarity of appearance are not biologically endangered or threatened, and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. Northern Long-eared Bat Status: Federally-Listed Threatened (4d) Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect The northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is a medium-sized bat about three to 3.7 inches in length but with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. This bat is distinguished by its long ears, particularly as compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis. The species’ range includes 37 states. White-nose syndrome, a fungal disease known to affect bats, is currently the predominant threat to this bat, especially throughout the Northeast where the species has declined by up to 99 percent from pre-white-nose syndrome levels at many hibernation sites. This bat generally is associated with old-growth forests composed of trees 100 years old or older. It relies on intact interior forest habitat, with low edge-to-interior ratios. Relevant late-successional forest features Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 7 include a high percentage of old trees, uneven forest structure (resulting in multilayered vertical structure), single and multiple tree-fall gaps, standing snags, and woody debris. These late successional forest characteristics may be favored for several reasons, including the large number of partially dead or decaying trees that the species uses for breeding, summer day roosting, and foraging. Small, highly fragmented, or young forests that provide limited areas of subcanopy foraging habitat may not be suitable. Young forests may also lack appropriate nursery sites. However, recent studies indicate that these bats can exploit relatively isolated and small forest fragments. Foraging occurs within forests, along forest edges, over forest clearings, and occasionally over ponds. Hibernation occurs primarily in caves, mines, and tunnels, typically those with large passages and entrances, relatively constant and cool temperatures, high humidity, and no air currents. Hibernators frequently roost in crevices, drill holes, and similar sites where they may be overlooked during surveys, but roosting in the open is not uncommon. A lack of suitable hibernacula may prevent occupancy of areas that otherwise have adequate habitat. Most nursery colonies are in cavities or beneath loose bark in trees or snags in upland forests, with roost entrances generally below or within the tree canopy. Reproductive females use a wide range of tree species. Roosts of males and nonreproductive females include tree hollows as well as cooler locations, including caves and mines. In Arkansas, pine snags were important summer roosts for males. Hibernation occurs from late summer/early fall to spring. In summer, an activity peak generally occurs one-two hours after sunset, with a secondary peak seven-eight hours after sunset. Nocturnal insects often exhibit a strong flight period among nocturnal insects beginning before sunset, peaking near midnight, and waning throughout the early morning hours, and a second but less intense flight period may occur before sunrise. The project corridor contains potentially-suitable roost trees and foraging habitat for this species, but we are aware of no known roost trees or hibernacula within 45 miles of the project. However, clearing activities associated with the project will likely begin at some point in late Spring/early Summer. S&ME reviewed 2014 aerial photographs and used the 2011 National Land Cover Database in GIS to determine the amount of potential northern long-eared bat summer habitat (forested area) that would be affected by the proposed project in relation to that of the surrounding area. The project disturbance area consists of approximately 91.5 acres, approximately 41.9 acres (45.8 percent) of which are forested. The remaining 49.6 acres of the project disturbance footprint consist of non-forested areas, including the existing, maintained natural gas transmission easement, which is already cleared of woody vegetation. Of the 41.9 acres that will be cleared, 23.9 acres within temporary work spaces will per allowed to regrow, with the remaining 18.0 acres being converted into new permanently maintained easement. To compare the amount of forested area affected by the proposed project to the surrounding area, S&ME established a one kilometer corridor centered along the proposed pipe centerline. Land area within the one kilometer corridor totals approximately 6,986 acres, made up largely of urban and exurban areas in the vicinity of Kernersville and Walkertown, NC. Based on the land use classifications determined by the 2011 National Land Cover Database, approximately 2,521 acres of the 6,986 acres (36.1 percent) within that corridor are wooded. Accordingly, the selected project route is slightly more wooded (9.7%) than that of the general vicinity. Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 8 It should be further noted that the 41.89 acres of forest clearing associated with the project will reduce the percentage of forestland within the one kilometer corridor from 36.1 percent to 35.5 percent, a difference of 0.6 percent. Once areas cleared for temporary workspace grow back, the percentage of forested area within the one kilometer corridor will be 35.8 percent, a reduction of only 0.3 percent from the amount of original forested area. Accordingly, the project as proposed should not have a significant effect on northern long-eared bat due to; 1) the minimal effect of the project clearing on forested land within one kilometer of the project route, and; 2) a majority of the pipe will be installed within an existing utility corridor that is already cleared of woody vegetation. Small-anthered Bittercress Status: Federally-Listed Endangered Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect This slender perennial herb is a member of the mustard or cress family, and is characterized by fibrous roots and typically one, but occasionally several, simple or branched stem(s) growing 20 to 40 centimeters tall. Basal leaves have one or two pairs of small lateral lobes, while stem leaves are alternate and mostly unlobed. The flowers consist of four white petals, six stamens, and small, rounded anthers. The fruit contains brown seeds that are approximately one millimeter long. This species is listed as a historic occurrence for Forsyth County, meaning that it is known only from historical occurrences, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. Habitat for small-anthered bittercress consists of seepages, wet rock crevices, stream banks, sandbars, and wet woods along small streams, in fully to partially-shaded area. It was known to occur in the Dan River watershed in Stokes and Forsyth Counties, North Carolina, and Patrick County, Virginia. The only known habitat in Forsyth County was converted into a cow pasture, and the species has never been re-identified in the county. Although the project area contains potentially suitable habitat for Small-anthered bittercress, no plants resembling this species were observed during the field reconnaissance, and it is unlikely that populations remain in Forsyth County. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the project will adversely affect this species. Reference: FWS Environmental Conservation Online System. Available: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/ and FWS species descriptions. Copies of the NCNHP database search, and the WRC and FWS letters are included in Appendix VI. Historic and Archaeological Resources To assist in your determination of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, S&ME submitted a scoping letter to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on August 30, 2017. The SHPO responded with a September 28, 2017 letter stating that they were aware of no historic or archaeological resources that would be affected by the project. A copy of the September 28, 2017 SHPO letter is included in Appendix VI. Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 9 Avoidance and Minimization Avoidance measures were undertaken during the routing phase by paralleling and abutting an existing easement except at areas where development of the adjacent area prohibited installation of the new line. In areas where the new easement could not parallel the existing one, a study corridor that ranged from 250-500 feet in width was assesses, and the new easement aligned to minimize stream/wetland impacts to the extent practicable. PNG has requested that the combined width of the permanent and temporary workspace be reduced from 100 feet in high ground areas to 65 feet at most wetland/stream crossings, based on the review of Piedmont’s construction Specialist. While this exceeds the 50-foot width specified in WCQ 4133, PNG Construction specialists determined that when working adjacent to the existing “live line,” which must remain operational during construction of the new line, 65 feet represents the minimum amount of workspace necessary to adequately and safely accommodate the following elements, all of which are necessary within that space: Installation of silt fence or other erosion control devices, along with appropriate offsets within the boundaries of the easement; placement of timber mats or equipment bridges for the travel lane in such a manner that allows sufficient boom and dipper arm swing radius of excavation and pipe-lowering equipment; trench excavation and sloping to a width and depth necessary to accommodate placement of the new pipe and avoid cave-ins or undermine adjacent equipment work space in wet or saturated soils, and; space for temporary placement and separate stockpiling of topsoil and subsoil. PNG does not propose to increase the amount of permanent easement at any of the stream and wetland crossings, and will limit the width of the permanently maintained corridor to 30 feet at all such areas. With respect to pipe installation methodology, crossings on this project have been designed as conventional trenching in wetland areas and “in-the-dry” isolation at stream crossings, with the exception of S7 and WD, which were designed as horizontal directional drills (HDD). Multiple factors affected selection of traditional methods rather than the use of “trenchless” technologies. These factors include: Physical limitations with respect to bending radius (flexibility) of the pipe Anticipated subsurface geologic conditions Existing topography and slope to accommodate acceptable entry and exit angle Availability of suitable additional workspace necessary to construct bore pits or set up drill rig and associated equipment Presence of existing utilities/infrastructure in relation to the new pipe Accessibility of the site for the specialized equipment Availability of additional land for pipe stringing, welding and pullback operations Additional costs associated with use of “trenchless” technology given the project scale The rolling terrain present within the project area prohibited the safe use of bored crossings for most streams due to the limited space available between the stream and hillside. A majority of the streams crossed are incised or located at the bottom of steep, relatively narrow valleys, making excavation of the bore pit and stockpiling of the soils within the corridor impracticable. Also, excavations of bore pits and drill pads in this terrain require additional clearing and workspace as compared to conventional open cut. As the bore pit must be excavated to a depth at which the bore can extend beneath the substrate of a stream or wetland, additional shoring of the pit would be necessary to meet safety standards. Those streams that were not located in steep valleys are located in or adjacent to wetland areas within a Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 10 floodplain where the anticipated groundwater surface elevation would inhibit excavation of safe bore pits and require constant dewatering operations. In addition to controlling construction costs for the benefit of PNG’s customers, the use of traditional trench construction allows the pipeline to be installed within a discrete, easily predictable time window, and at a consistent 4-5 feet below land surface depth for a far greater length when compared to trenchless installation. Maintaining a normal depth is critical to the safety and integrity of the pipeline. As the depth of cover increases, so does the difficulty in locating, exposing, and performing routine maintenance required for transmission pipelines. At the proposed stream crossings, dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert clean water flow around the work area until the crossing is completed. Typically, stream crossings can be completed within 24-hours of initiation. Once work affecting streams or wetlands is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance. Typical details for a dam and pump and flume methodology for isolation of the trench excavation are included in Appendix V. Project BMPs used in connection with conventional isolation methodology include the following: Crossings will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary. Where possible, 24-hour installation and restoration will be required. Sufficient equipment to execute the crossing in an expeditious, environmentally responsible manner will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing. Crossings will be conducted during anticipated low flow conditions. Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible, stormwater events will be avoided during and immediately following installation of the pipe. The crossings will be monitored during installation by personnel experienced in stream and wetland crossing procedures, familiar with site conditions, and knowledgeable in North Carolina environmental regulations. The monitor shall have the authority to stop work should conditions change and additional or different measures be needed. This professional will be on-site from the initiation (preparatory stages) through to the completion (e.g. implementation of the restoration plan). Sufficient qualified staffing will be maintained for the project duration such that compliance monitoring activities associated with pipeline installation in other locations do not take precedence over crossings. The upstream and downstream crossing points will be sealed to isolate the crossing for pipeline installation “in the dry.” Clean steel plates, sand bags, or similar measures will be inserted to temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use on streams using biodegradable products or heat. On both sides of the installed plates (both upstream and downstream) sandbags will additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of water, and provide a secondary barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be monitored for groundwater intrusion and, if noted, excess water will be pumped to a discharge site located 50’-100’ from the top of bank of the receiving stream. Discharged water from the trench will be filtered through an appropriate E&SC measure. Where possible, the top 6-12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from the subgrade material and kept saturated during the installation. Pumps shall be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back-up pumps shall be kept on-site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control high flows. All pumps will have screened intakes and will be placed in secondary-containment for the duration of the installation. In Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 11 the event an unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near the crossing will be monitored 24-hours a day until normal flow conditions are present. Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water neither accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly on the downstream side. At the downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be controlled such that scouring of the stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to its downstream discharge into the receiving stream. Removal of in-stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allow a gradual re- introduction of flowing water into the channel. Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre-construction contours to the extent practical. A cover crop and specialized riparian seed mix will be applied for the entire length of banks disturbed by the crossing. Coir matting with appropriate shear strength will additionally be installed to anchor the seeding and the banks. Stream crossings will be monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of the pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous vegetation reaches 80-percent coverage. All disturbed areas within wetlands or on stream banks will be seeded with a customized seed mix that will extend 10-feet landward of the jurisdictional boundary. Stream banks temporarily affected by trenching or placement of equipment bridges will be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically designed for riparian areas, and with biodegradable coir matting. Affected wetland areas will be seeded with a native wetland seed mix; however, no heavy mulching will occur within wetlands. Construction equipment operating near streams and the wetland areas will be limited to that necessary for excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Vegetation near the streams will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re-growth. Appropriate E&SC practices outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and approved by the local governing authority shall be in compliance with specifications governing the proper design, installation, operation, and maintenance of such BMPs to comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard. The project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No. 12 and WQC No. 4133, except as noted. Following the work, the affected areas will be restored to their original grade and contour. As proposed, the project will not result in permanent changes to the ground surface elevation(s) in the area or affect dimension, pattern, or profile of the affected streams. Affected areas are proposed to be restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (Appendix VII) following completion of the work. Mitigation The project will not permanently impact stream channels, as those that are temporarily affected will be restored following construction. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that stream mitigation will be required. To account for the proposed permanent wetland impacts, PNG proposed to purchase the riparian wetland credit from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) at a 1:1 ratio in the corresponding HUCs: 0.186 acre in Yadkin 03040101, and 0.278 acre in Roanoke 03010103. An acceptance letter from DMS is included in Appendix VIII. A 1:1 ratio is proposed because the permanent impacts will result only from conversion, and there will be no loss of waters of the U.S. Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project March 26, 2018 12 Closing By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence with this NWP No. 12 / WQC No. 4133 permit application. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726. Sincerely, S&ME Joey Lawler, PWS Project Manager jlawler@smeinc.com Senior Review by Jason S. Reeves, PE Cc Alicia DePalma, Duke Energy Figures PR O P OS E D P IPELINE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.11 " = 2 m iles 3-15 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN\01_VICINITY.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-15-2018 0 2 4 Miles VICINITY MAP ³ MATCHLINEBelews Creek [NC]Walkertown [NC]PIPE CENTERLINE ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE USG S 24k TOPO MAP BOUNDARIES SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.2 1 " = 1 ,50 0 ' 3-15 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\02_03TOPO.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-15-20180 1,500 3,000 (FEET)USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP³ REFERENCE:TH IS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONA L P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT B ASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. MATCHLINEBelews Creek [NC]Kernersville [NC] PIPE CENTERLINE ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE USG S 24k TOPO MAP BOUNDARIES SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.3 1 " = 1 ,50 0 ' 3-15 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\02_03TOPO.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-15-20180 1,500 3,000 (FEET)USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP³ REFERENCE:TH IS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONA L P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED AREAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT B ASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$STREAM S2PERENNIAL FLOW164 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 10 STREAM S4 (F RAZIER CREEK)PERENN IAL FLOW67 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 11 WETL AND WBHEADWATER FOREST0.083 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 28 WETL AND WDHEADWATER FOREST0.066 AC . IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 29 CAMELLIA LNPAR NE LL RIDGE DR HAMMOCK FARM RD OLD WALKERTOW N R D NEWWALKERTOWNRDMARSHALLBERGRD DILLON FA RMRDBOXWOO D D R A M B E R LN WILLISTON CT WILLISTONRD DEERWOODFOR ESTTL M APLE B R OOKSTLEE HAVEN LN MATCHLINE 1PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.4 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ STREAM S6PERENNIAL FLOW79 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 12 STREAM S5 (LOW ERY MILL CREEK)PERENN IAL FLOW156 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 13 STREAM S7PERENNIAL FLOW276 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 14 WETL AND WFHEADWATER FOREST0.057 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 30 K I N G S GATE DR GAL L ANT LN GALLANTCTESTHER LN ROYAL GATE RD S UDSBEE LN RA M S E UR DRHIGHKNOLLDR GOSPEL LIGHT CHURCH RD PAR NE LL RIDGE DR O LD B ELEW SC R EEK R D S T O V ALLDRI N A L N RENOCTWALKER RIDGE DR CRANFILL LNCHALETDRWALKERTOWN-GU T H R IE RDH YATTDRKNOL L VI E WDRMORRISRD KNOLL RIDGE DR DIANECTFRANKLINFARMRDSUNSETHOLLOWDRREIDSVILLE RDMATCHLINE 1MATCHLINE 2PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.5 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ STREAM S11 (MARTIN MILL CREEK)PERENN IAL FLOW27 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 15 STREAM S15INTERMITTENT FLOW65 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 16 STREAM S17PERENNIAL FLOW89 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 17 WETL AND WMBOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD0.139 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 32 WETL AND WLHEADWATER FOREST0.054 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 31 WETL AND WNHEADWATER FOREST0.004 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 33 KINGS GATE DR WI L S O N D AIRYRD S I R I S A A C C T GALLANTCTROYAL GATE RD GAL L ANT LN VAL L EY DA LE R D B A R R Y K N O L L S R D BRITTAINY WO O D R D CREEKRIDGECTROXBURYLN CREEKRIDGE LN W E AT H E R R ID G E R D WEATHER RIDGE CTO L D H O LL O W R DROBERSON FARM CTROXB U R Y C TCOUNTRY COVE LNRI VE ND E L L R DSHADDOWFAX DR ROBURTON RD CHES LNROBERSON FARM RD LOCHL O RIE NRDWEST RDO LD VALLEYSCHOOLRDBEULAH LN JAMESEASTDR MATCHLINE 3MATCHLINE 2PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.6 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ STREAM S18 (BELEWS CREEK)PERENN IAL FLOW101 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 18 STREAM S19PERENNIAL FLOW66 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 19 STREAM S20INTERMITTENT FLOW26 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 20 STREAM S24PERENNIAL FLOW101 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 22 STREAM S21PERENNIAL FLOW58 LF IN P RO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 21 WETL AND WQHEADWATER FOREST0.094 AC . IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 34 WETL AND WSHEADWATER FOREST0.108 AC . IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 36 WETL AN D WTbBOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD0.449 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 38 WETL AN D WTaSEEP0.180 AC . IN P RO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 37 WETL AND WRHEADWATER FOREST0.069 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 35 PERRYRDECHOLS CR W E S T M O UNTAIN ST WESLO DRMOORE ACRES STCRITTER HO L L O W L N WO O D L A NDT L H O Y D L N FULP R DMATCHLINE 3MATCHLINE 4PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.7 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$$STREAM S26PERENNIAL FLOW154 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 24 STREAM S25PERENNIAL FLOW67 LF IN PROJECT AREASEE FIG URE 23 WETL AND WUHEADWATER FOREST0.170 AC . IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 39 WETL AND WVNON-TIDAL F RE SHWATER MARSH0.099 AC. IN PROJECT AREASEE FIG URE 40 ROCKFO R D R D BROWN RD LINVILLE SPRINGS RD DOB S ON S TKERNER RDGEORGEPLACEDRWESTMOUNTAINST ANGELA RUN DR AQUAVIEW DRQUALITY DRALVERSTONE DR PERRYRDB R O WNSRUNDRAQ UAVIEW CT BONA CT GREGORY WAY DR HEDRICK DR RO CK FORD CTLISARU NDRVALLEYVILLAGERDOLD VALLEY SCHOOL RD ECHOLSCR RENEE DRO A K W O O D F O R E S T L NWILLIAMBROWNLNLISA R U N CT TANNELSON DR DEER E-H I T A C H I RD D AN AY DR MANORWOOD D R MATCHLINE 5MATCHLINE 4PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.8 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. $$$$ $$$$$$$$STREAM S28 (E AST BELEWS CREEK)PERENN IAL FLOW66 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 25 STREAM S29PERENNIAL FLOW75 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 26 STREAM S30PERENNIAL FLOW245 LF IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 27 WETL AND WWHEADWATER FOREST0.026 AC . IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 41 WETL AND WXHEADWATER FOREST0.073 AC. IN PRO JECT AREASEE FIG URE 42TODD CTTOM CTBURKEHOLLOWRDC H A U CER M AN ORLNPINEYGROVERDHEDRICKDRHOWELL CTCARMEL CT RIERSON RDSYDNEY CTBOSTCROSSINGLNW H IS P E R IN G B R O O K R DFLYNNWOODDR LINVILLE SPRINGS RD J A N E WAYCT BROWN RD L A K E C R E S T D R CALLAL I L LYLN NORTH M AIN STC L A Y F L Y N T R DLINVILLECTROUNDMEADOWDRHARRIS CTP E G G A VDONNELL STBRIARFIELD RDP O R T E R C T AQ UAVIEW CT C IN E M ADRASH FOREST STBOST ST BEECHVI EW LNPORTERLNH U M B E R SI DED RKINGSTONAVRAGLAND STHICKORY GROVE CTCHESTNUT VI LLAGE LNMC COY RD GREENHOLLYTLBI RCH FOREST STAVONDALE WOODS CTCAMBRID G E S Q U A R E L N PEACH GROVE CTPRINCE HAVENLN W IN D S O R M A N ORWY R O C K F O R D R D ROCK FORD CT WOODDALEDRAQUAVIEW DRL E E H Y D R JULIAN POND LN OAK STF A R M W O O D D R SMITHEDWARDSRD VILLA DR P I T T S S T M E A D O W B R O O K V I L L A G E L N M E AD OW B RO OK PA RK DR MATCHLINE 5PIPE CENTERLINE HDD BO RE INSTALLATION ACC ESS ROAD CENTERLINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS OPEN WATER WETLAND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.9 1 " = 5 00 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADrawing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp\PCN\04-09_AERIAL.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-20180 400 800 (FEET)2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH³ REFERENCE:GIS B ASE LAYERS WERE OBTA INE D FROM FORSYTH COUNTY AND NC ONEMAP. PROJECT DESIGNINFORMATION WAS O BTAINED FROM HGA. STREA M AND WETLAND FEATURES WERE DELINEATED INTHE FIELD U SING GPS EQU IP MENT CAPA BLE OF SUB -M ETER ACCURACY. THIS MAP IS FORINFORMATIONAL P URP OSES ONLY. A LL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURV EY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. Appendix I Jurisdictional Delineation Information Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 1 This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by assigned counties can be found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx, by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager. ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 General Number: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 General Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H. NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s) authorized agent to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 2 A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: _______________________________________________ City, State: _______________________________________________ County: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Mailing Address: _________________________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________________________ Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________ Select one: I am the current property owner. I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant1 Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase Other, please explain. ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2 Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter. 2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record). See attached list Winston Salem,NC to Kernersville,NC Forsyth See attached list Piedmont Natural Gas 4720 Piedmont Row Drive Charlotte,NC 28210 Natural gas utility company See attached list 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 3 D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4 By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on- site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property. Print Name Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5 Date Signature E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable) I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization. I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. Other:___________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a continuation sheet. 5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s). 4 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 4 F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One) I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property. PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is “preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do not expire. I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years (subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05- 02). I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. G. ALL REQUESTS Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the review area. Size of Property or Review Area acres. The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site. 91 4 4 4 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 5 H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________ Longitude: ______________________ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area. Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been reviewed and approved).6  North Arrow  Graphical Scale  Boundary of Review Area  Date  Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary assessment reach. For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:  Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.  Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries, impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary, open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear length of each of these features as appropriate.  Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non- jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e. “Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage or linear length of these features as appropriate. For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:  Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404, Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and linear length of these features as appropriate. Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type) ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Jurisdiction/ >Center of Route 36.147941° -80.123498°4 4 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request Version: May 2017 Page 6 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form • PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the Aquatic Resource Table • AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form8 Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph USGS Topographic Map Soil Survey Map Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) Landscape Photos (if taken) NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms Other Assessment Forms _____________________________________________________________________________ 7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf 8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/ Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): March 21, 2018 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Applicant: Piedmont Natural Gas Agent: S&ME, Inc. 4720 Piedmont Row Drive 9751 Southern Pine Blvd Charlotte, N.C. 28210 Charlotte, NC 28273 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The proposed project entails construction of an approximately 8.4-mile natural gas transmission pipeline. The new line will originate at an existing station site on the south side of Walkertown Road northeast of Winston Salem (36.159131°N, -80.180809°W) and end at North Main Street across from Chaucer Manor Lane in Kernersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina (36.131378°N, -80.056034°W). A majority of the new line will be installed adjacent to an existing natural gas transmission utility easement. (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Forsyth City: Winston Salem to Kernersville Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 36.147820°N, -80.123649°W Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83 Name of nearest waterbody: Frazier Creek, Mill Creek, Lowery Creek, Martin Mill Creek, Belews Creek, East Belews Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: See attached Table Non-wetland waters: See attached Table Cowardin Class: See attached Table Stream Flow: See attached Table Wetlands: See attached Table Cowardin Class: See attached Table Ponds: 0.0 Cowardin Class: See attached Table Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: N/A Non-Tidal:N/A E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): September 2017 2 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre- construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there “may be” waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: The site is depicted on the attached exhibits prepared by S&ME. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. 3 Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Corps navigable waters study: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. 03040101 (Pee Dee) and 03010103 (Roanoke) U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:1:24,000 (USGS 7.5- Minute Topographic Quadrangle:Walkertown, NC (1986) and Belews Creek, NC (2000). USGS quadrangle map depicts the project corridor as a combination or cleared or wooded uplands crossed by numerous streams. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Forsyth County Soil Survey (1976). National Wetlands Inventory map(s). Cite name: The USFWS NWI Maps depict numerous freshwater wetland areas within the project corridor. State/Local wetland inventory map(s):. FEMA/FIRM maps:. 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): World Imagery 2015, Google Earth Aerial Photographs (1994-2015), or Other (Name & Date): Photos submitted by S&ME, Inc. depicted the aquatic features on the site. Uplands on the site consisted of woodland, open fields or developed area. Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: We are not aware of previous detreminations conducted in connection with the original pipeline construction. More recently, a section of Line 328, which the new line will parallel, was relocated to accommodate NCDOT’s Winston-Salem Northern Beltway Project (U-2579, Section C). Other information (please specify):. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. See attached Request for JD Form __________________________ ______________________________ Signature and date of Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED) (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS 3000 6886-78-7550 DONALD W. HUBBARD & TIMOTHY D. HUBBARD 933 N. MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 933 N. MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 3003 6886-78-8247 DONALD W. HUBBARD & TIMOTHY D. HUBBARD 933 N. MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 933 N. MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 3010 6886-79-8270 WILLIAM CHARLES EDWARDS 201 S CHERRY STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 NORTH MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 3030 6887-60-6266 MAMIE B. RIERSON 1226 N. MAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 RIERSON ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 3050 6887-60-1329 ROBERT O. SMITH 314 RIERSON ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 314 RIERSON ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 3080 6887-50-8648 TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE PO BOX 728 KERNERSVILLE, NC 27285 WHISPERING BROOK ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 3090 6887-40-4622 ANNA BROOKS 318 CHURCH STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 PINEY GROVE ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 4000 6887-40-2600 WILLOWBROOK CARE CENTER, INC. PO BOX 5967 HIGH POINT, NC 27262 732 PINEY GROVE ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 4010 6887-30-2922 DONALD & AGATHA MARTIN 1030 MANORWOOD DRIVE KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 LINVILLE SPRINGS ROAD KERNSERVILLE, NC 4020 6887-10-9668 SWAIM FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST ATTN: JOHN W. SWAIM 670 DOBSON STREET KERSVILLE, NC 27284 LINVILLE SPRINGS ROAD KERNSERVILLE, NC 4030 6887-10-1952 MARY R. HAAG 816 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, +V31+G31:H31 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 4040 6887-01-8257 MARY R. HAAG 816 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 816 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 4050 6877-90-8831 HARRY S. LANKFORD 807 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 DOBSON STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 4060 6887-02-2022 Ricky and Gwyn Grubbs Living Trust ATTN: Ricky E. Grubbs 909 Dobson St Kernersville, NC OLD VALLEY SCHOOL ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT 4070 6877-91-4818 MONTIE MOSELEY BOYD 7400 TANNELSON DRIVE KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 7400 TANNELSON DRIVE KERNERSVILLE, NC 4080 6877-81-5985 WILLIAM MCFARLAND AVANT & MARY LEE AVANT 632 HOPKINS ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 115 ECHOLS CIRCLE KERNERSVILLE, NC 4090 6877-72-9152 WILLIAM MCFARLAND AVANT & MARY LEE AVANT 632 HOPKINS ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 OLD VALLEY SCHOOL ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5000 6877-73-3296 LARRY L. & BETTY A. CALLAHAN 2551 RENN ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 OLD VALLEY SCHOOL ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5010 687-72-0558 230 PERRY ROAD, LLC 2013 SAINT ANDRES ROAD GREENSBORO, NC 27408 PERRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5020 6877-62-8604 LARRY L. & BETTY A. CALLAHAN 2551 RENN ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 PERRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5030 6877-63-3418 WYNONA P. ECHOLS 5960 WOODFIELD DRIVE KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 PERRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5040 6877-62-0291 & 6877-61-5961 JAMES FRANCIS BLUE (Deceased) 249 PERRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 249 PERRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5042 6877-61-6671 Joseph Brandon Echols and wifr Sarah Anna Echols 229 Perry Road Kernersville NC 27284 5050 6877-43-1370 OMNISOURCE SOUTHEAST, LLC 7575 W JEFFERESON BLVD. FORT WAYNE, IN. 46804 1426 WEST MOUNTAIN STREET KERNERSVILLE, NC 5051 6877-46-3055 TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE PO BOX 728 KERNERSVILLE, NC 27285 6408 OLD VALLEY SCHOOL ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 5060 6877-13-8817 B&K QTIP TRUST C/O KEISHA MARIE WEST PO BOX 1422 KERNERSVILLE, NC 27285 179 WOODLAND TRL KERNERSVILLE, NC 5070 6877-03-5518 AARON B. WILSON REVOCABLE TRUST 2055 WILSON DAIRY ROAD WALKTOWN, NC 27051 2055 WILSON DAIRY ROAD WALKTOWN, NC PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT 5090 6867-94-6896 MARK W. & DEBORAH W. WILSON 2130 WILSON DAIRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 RofD shows Quitlcaim to Robert & Norma Wilson WILSON DAIRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 6000 6867-84-9928 A B WILSON 2055 WILSON DAIRY ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 2175 VALLEYDALE LANE KERNERSVILLE, NC 6010 6867-84-4322 NEW BROOK PROPERTIES, LLC 415 COOL SPRINGS ROAD WINSTON SALEM, NC 27107 ROBURTON ROAD KENERSVILLE, NC 6020 6867-84-0413 RALPH HARRELL 5390 ROBURTON ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 5390 ROBURTON ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 6030 6867-74-3490 JORENE J. COOKE IRREVOCABLE TRUST C/O WILLIAM RYAN COOKE 4275 OLD HOLLOW ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 OLD HOLLOW ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 6060 6867-64-0661 JORENE J. COOKE IRREVOCABLE TRUST ATTN: WILLIAM RYAN COOKIE 4275 OLD HOLLOW ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 27284 OLD HOLLOW ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 6070 6867-54-9059 DONALD A. COOKE 3704 COOPERS FARM ROAD GREENSBORO, NC 27406 OLD HOLLOW ROAD KERNERSVILLE, NC 6080 6867-44-1741 WALTER G. JONES 915 SIR ISAAC DRIVE WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101 915 SIR ISAAC DRIVE WINSTON- SALEM, NC 6090 6867-34-8937 MICHAEL R. JONES & MICHAEL P. JONES 990 SI ISAAC DRIVE WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101 990 SIR ISAAC DRIVE WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7000 6867-35-2113 STEPHEN G. VOGLER & TRACY N. VOGLER PO BOX 665 WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 WALKERTOWN GUTHRIE ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 7001 6867-25-6130 STEPHEN G. VOGLER & TRACY N. VOGLER PO BOX 665 WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 WALKERTOWN GUTHRIE ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 7003 6867-25-0156 MARK S. HURDLE & VERONICA S. HURDLE 940 WALKERTOWN GUTHRIE ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101 940 WALKERTOWN GUTHRIE ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT 7004 6867-25-9481 PHYLLIS VOGLER SISK 2225 DARROW ROAD, WINSTON SALEM NC WALKERTOWN GUTHRIE ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 7020 6867-14-6579 NOLEN GOSPEL LIGHT CHURCH ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 7021 6867-14-3316 Grace L. Essick 4941 Gospel Light Church Rd Winston Salem NC 27101 4941 Gospel Light Church Rd Winston Salem NC 27101 7023 6867-15-5104 Joe David Beamer & Cynthia Wells Beamer 2149 Darrow Road, Winston Salem, NC 27101 2149 Darrow Road Winston Salem, NC 27101 7024 6867-14-4959 Becky L. Brown 2137 Darrow Road Winston Salem, NC 27101 2137 Darrow Road Winston Salem, NC 27101 7025 6867-14-3869 Becky Lee Maynor Brown 0 Darrow Road Winston Salem, NC 27101 2137 Darrow Road Winston Salem, NC 27101 7030 6867-14-0555 STEPHEN LEE WARDEN & SHANNON P. WARDEN 3165 KNOLL RIDGE DRIVE WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 OLD BELEWS CREEK ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7040 6867-04-2678 DARRELL T. WESTMORELAND & STEPHANIE C. WESTMORELAND 1245 MIDDLETON LOP WALNUT COVE, NC 27052 OLD BELEWS CREEK ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7041 6867-04-6679 MARY JACQUELINE BRENNAN 2050 DARROW ROAD WINSTON SALEM, NC 27101 2050 DARROW ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7042 6867-04-2870 JAMES RAVON CAUDILL AND WIFE, ASHLEY BEAN CAUDILL 2051 DARROW ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7050 6857-94-8317 DARREL T. WESTMORELAND & KAREN A. WESTMORELAND 1245 MIDDLETON LOOP WALNUT COVE, NC 27052 4785 OLD BELEWS CREEK ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 7051 6857-94-6835 ROBINS WALK SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. 4125 WALKER AVENUE GREENSBORO, NC 27407 OLD BELEWS CREEK ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 7060 6857-84-6819 DARREL T. WESTMORELAND & KAREN A. WESTMORELAND 1245 MIDDLETON LOOP WALNUT COVE, NC 27052 4855 REIDSVILLE ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT 7061 6857-85-1210 THOMAS JONES SHEPHERD & TAMMY F. SHEPHERD 4775 OLA LANE WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 4775 OLA LANE WALKERTOWN, NC 7070 6857-75-0596 MICHAEL W. WESTMORELAND & WADE W. WESTMORELAND 7080 6857-45-9868 FARRELL B. BYERS & MARILYN BYERS 3475 WILLISTON ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 3326 WILLISTON ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC 7084 6857-35-7433 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1605 WESTBROOK PLAZA DRIVE WINSTON SALEM, NC 27103 4800 LEE HAVEN LANE WALKERTOWN, NC 7085 6857-45-4786 Lee Haven Lane - Ownership undetermined 7086 6857-45-4786 Lee Ann Holder (Divorced)3330 WILLISTON ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC 7090 6857-46-4032 FARRELL B. BYERS & MARILYN BYERS 3475 WILLISTON ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 LEE HAVEN LANE WALKERTOWN, NC 8020 6857-36-8076 FARRELL B. BYERS & MARILYN BYERS 3475 WILLISTON ROAD WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 LEE HAVEN LANE WALKERTOWN, NC 8030 6857-35-4500 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1605 WESTBROOK PLAZA DRIVE WINSTON SALEM, NC 27103 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27105 8031 6857-36-3162 PEGGY LANKFORD HOOVER PO BOX 742 WALKERTOWN, NC 27051 3331 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON SALEM NC 27105 8040 6857-36-1159 KIMBERLY POINDEXTER 4301 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27105 3332 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 8041 6857-35-1879 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1605 WESTBROOK PLAZA DRIVE WINSTON SALEM, NC 27103 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27105 8050 6857-36-0309 CHARLES R. DILLON (deceased) & JUDY DILLON 3380 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27105 3380 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM NC 8060 6857-26-9614 SANDY DILLON YOKELEY 1111 HARVEY TEAGUE ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27107 3392 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM NC, 27107 PROJECT TRACT NO.PARCEL ID OWNER NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER LIST PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECT 8070 6857-36-0911 RUBY DILLON SEIVERS (Deceased) Deborah C. Charles and Bobby L. Thore (Brother and Sister) 3410 DILLON FARM ROAD 0 DILLON FARM ROAD WINSTON SALEM, NC 27105 8080 6857-27-7270 FERRELL CONSTRUCTION CO. 854 W. 5TH STREET WINSTON SALEM NC 27101 0 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON SALEM NC, 27101 9000 6857-27-5349 FERRELL CONSTRUCTION CO. 854 W. 5TH STREET WINSTON SALEM NC 27101 0 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON SALEM NC, 27101 9020 6857-17-6572 ROBERT B. STIMPSON 4320 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27105 4320 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 9030 6857-17-6982 JOHN H. VANHOY 4350 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27105 NEW WALKERTOWN ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC 9040 6857-18-4262 EDGAR J. SEIVERS 2824 BIRCHWOOD DRIVE WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27103 HAMMOCK FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 9050 6857-18-4475 ANN M. SEIVERS 6821 DENNIS ROAD WALNUT GROVE, NC 27052 HAMMOCK FARM ROAD WINSTON- SALEM, NC 9060 6857-18-4678 NICHOLAS P. PATELLA & VIRGINIA S. PATELLA 100 MILNOR PLACE WINSTON- SALEM, NC 27104 210 HAMMOCK FARM ROAD WINSTON-SALEM, NC NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S12 09.11.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.148220° -80.136503° Intermittent Walkertown 9.5 9 5.5 24 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S15 09.11.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.146611° -80.124776° Intermittent Belews Creek,NC 14.5 7.5 4 26 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S18 09.18.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.146521° -80.113485° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 21.5 10 6.5 38 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S19 09.18.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.145972° -80.109234° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 16 10 4.5 30.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S20 09.18.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.146080° -80.107829° Intermittent Belews Creek,NC 11 8.5 3 22.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S21 09.20.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.145283° -80.102358° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 13.5 10.5 6 30 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S24 09.20.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.144790° -80.101279° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 19.5 12.5 6.5 38.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S25 09.20.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.142518° -80.092268° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 16.5 9 7 32.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S26 09.20.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.145972° -80.109234° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 17.5 9.5 6 33 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S28 09.22.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.137478° -80.064310° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 25 11 10.5 46.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S29 09.22.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.134566° -80.058273° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 20.5 9 7.5 37 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S30 09.22.2017 PNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.133943° -80.057914° Perennial Belews Creek,NC 15 9 7 31 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S02 09.06.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.155791° -80.180385° Perennial Walkertown 13.5 10 7 30.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S04 09.07.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.150753° -80.170091° Perennial Walkertown 17.5 8.5 7.5 33.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S05 09.07.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.148083° -80.158960° Perennial Walkertown 22 11 10 43 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S06 09.07.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.149737° -80.160327° Perennial Walkertown 13.5 9.5 7.5 30.5 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S07 09.07.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.147817° -80.158454° Perennial Walkertown 19 10.5 8.5 38 NC Division of Water Quality –Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 41 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: Project/Site: Latitude: Evaluator: County: Longitude: Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30* Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_________) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _________) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biology (Subtotal = _________) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: Sketch: S11 09.11.2017 LPNG Line 442 J.Lawler Forsyth 36.148715° -80.137637° Perennial Walkertown Martin Creek 21.5 9 10 40.5 Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WQ 22-Sep-17 1.0% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Floodplain MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth -80.113556° 36.146549° Hatboro - Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts flat Wetland located in active cattle pasture Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 0.6 0 12 6 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Wetland hydrology is present Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20 10 5 5 0 0 Yes No 3100.0%OBL 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 75.0% 20 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20 20 0.0% 60 120 0.0% 25 75 10 40 0 0 0 0.0% 115 255 0.0% 2.217 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 55.6%FACW 22.2%FAC 11.1%FACW 5.6%FACU 5.6%FAC 90 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 5 0 0 0 0.0% 100.0%FACU 0.0% 0.0% 5 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WQSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: Salix nigra Rubus allegheniensis (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' (Plot size: (Plot size:5' Persicaria pensylvanica Ranunculus bulbosus Juncus effusus Eupatorium capillifolium Microstegium vimineum (Plot size:30' Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WQSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 10-12 0-10 10YR 10YR 5/1 4/1 98 95 10YR 10YR 5/6 5/6 20 5 C C PL PL Silt Loam Clay Loam Soil is hydric Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WQ - UP 22-Sep-17 1.0% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Flat MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth -80.113556° 36.146549° Hatboro - Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts Taken in active cattle pasture Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 0.6 0YesNo Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Wetland hydrology is not present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 30 25 15 5 5 0 0 Yes No 00.0% 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 5 15 85 340 10 0 0 100.0%FACU 90 355 0.0% 3.944 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5%FACU 31.3%FACU 18.8%FACU 6.3%FAC 6.3%FACU 80 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WQ - UPSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' (Plot size: Rubus allegheniensis (Plot size:5' Eupatorium capillifolium Echinochloa crusgalli Conyza canadensis Rumex crispus Phytolacca americana (Plot size:30' Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WQ - UPSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 0-12 7.5YR 5/3 100 Sandy Clay Loam Soil is not hydric Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WT 20-Sep-17 2.0% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Gulch or Gully MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth NC -80.102681° 36.145377° Rhodhiss - Typic Hapludults convex Seep area near S21 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 1.1 0 12 1 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Wetland hydrology is present 30 15 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 2 2 2 0 0 Yes No 457.7%FACU 28.8%FAC 73.8%FAC 9.6%FACU 57.1% 52 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 2 0.0% 2 4 0.0% 46 138 40 160 0 10 50 0.0% 100 354 0.0% 3.540 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 47.6%FAC 23.8%FACU 9.5%OBL 9.5%FACW 9.5%FAC 21 0.0% 0.0% 5 0 0.0% Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%FAC 0 10 10 2 0 0.0% 45.5%UPL 45.5%FAC 9.1%FAC 22 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WTSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: Liriodendron tulipifera Carpinus caroliniana Liquidambar styraciflua Fagus grandifolia Magnolia macrophylla (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' Lindera benzoin Euonymus americanus (Plot size: (Plot size:5' Microstegium vimineum Polystichum acrostichoides Carex lurida Xanthorhiza simplicissima Medeola virginiana (Plot size:30' Smilax rotundifolia Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WTSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 2-12 0-2 10YR 10YR 4/2 3/1 95 100 10YR 5/6 5 Sandy Loam Loam Soil is hydric Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WT-UP 20-Sep-17 3.0% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Footslope MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth NC -80.102522° 36.145336° Rhodhiss - Typic Hapludults Slope near WT Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 1.7 24 24 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) No hydrologic indicators noted 30 30 10 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 Yes No 233.3%FACU 33.3%FACU 811.1%FAC 11.1%FACU 25.0% 90 5.6%FAC 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 5 10 0.0% 25 75 85 340 0 5 25 0.0% 120 450 0.0% 3.750 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%FACU 50.0%FAC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10 0.0% 0.0% 5 0 0.0% Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%FAC 0 5 5 5 0 0.0% 33.3%UPL 33.3%FACU 33.3%FACU 15 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 5 0 5.6%FACW 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WT-UPSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: Liriodendron tulipifera Fagus grandifolia Liquidambar styraciflua Quercus alba Carpinus caroliniana Ulmus americana Magnolia macrophylla (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' Cornus florida Ligustrum sinense (Plot size: (Plot size:5' Polystichum acrostichoides Microstegium vimineum (Plot size:30' Vitis rotundifolia Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WT-UPSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 2-12 0-2 10YR 10YR 4/6 4/3 100 100 Sandy Loam Sandy Loam Hydric soil is not present. Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WX 22-Sep-17 0.5% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Floodplain MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth -80.057881° 36.133907° Bannertown - Typic Dystrudepts flat Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 0.3 16 12 8 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Wetland hydrology is present Plot located in existing utility easement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 20 10 5 0 0 0 Yes No 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 35 70 0.0% 75 225 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 110 295 0.0% 2.682 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 68.2%FAC 18.2%FACW 9.1%FACW 4.5%FACW 0.0% 110 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WXSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' (Plot size: (Plot size:5' Microstegium vimineum Impatiens capensis Boehmeria cylindrica Persicaria pensylvanica (Plot size:30' Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WXSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 3-12 0-3 10YR 10YR 4/2 3/1 95 98 10YR 10YR 5/6 5/6 5 2 C C PL PL Fine Sandy Loam Loam Soil is hydric Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? WX - UP 22-Sep-17 2.0% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lat.: Hydric Soil Present? Sampling Point: Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. State: °Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): T (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Datum: naturally problematic? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Remarks: R Are Vegetation Long.: significantly disturbed? Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope: Investigator(s): (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) City/County: , Soil / Soil Map Unit Name: , or Hydrology , Soil , or Hydrology NWI classification: Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Project/Site: Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: S Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Applicant/Owner: Sampling Date: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region PNG Line 442 Piedmont Natural Gas J. Lawler Floodplain MLRA 136 in LRR P Forsyth -80.057989° 36.134049° Bannertown - Typic Dystrudepts Taken on slope near WX Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers 1.1 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Hydrology Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Dry Season Water Table (C2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Drainage Patterns (B10) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Iron Deposits (B5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC-neutral Test (D5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Wetland hydrology is not present Wetland vegetation is dominant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 10 10 10 5 0 0 Yes No 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 10 20 0.0% 60 180 20 80 0 0 0 0.0% 90 280 0.0% 3.111 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 55.6%FAC 11.1%FACU 11.1%FACW 11.1%FAC 5.6%FACU 90 0.0% 0.0% 0 5 5.6%FACU Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Woody Vine Stratum (B) = Total Cover = Total Cover Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? US Army Corps of Engineers Dominance Test worksheet: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Prevalence Index worksheet: Prevalence Index = B/A = (A/B) 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) Herb Stratum = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: x 1 = x 2 = x 3 = x 4 = x 5 = (A) (A) Percent of dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: (B) Tree Stratum Shrub Stratum *Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS. Dominance Test is > 50% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% = Total Cover Sapling-Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% Definition of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines, regardless of height. WX - UPSampling Point: ) ) ) ) ) Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. 0 0.0% Tree stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub stratum – Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb stratum – Consists of all herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines – Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Four Vegetation Strata: Five Vegetation Strata: (Plot size:30' (Plot size:15' (Plot size: (Plot size:5' Microstegium vimineum Rumex acetosa Persicaria pensylvanica Rumex crispus Andropogon virginicus Lonicera japonica (Plot size:30' Dominant Species? Rel.Strat. Cover Absolute % Cover Indicator Status 1 1 1 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. WX - UPSoilSampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Color (moist) Color (moist) Matrix Redox Features %Loc²Texture RemarksType% Yes No Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Dark Surface (S7) Stratified Layers (A5) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) Redox Depressions (F8) 1 1 3 3 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ²Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) 0-12 10YR 4/3 100 Sandy Loam Hydric soil is not present. Other (Explain in Remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147,148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Appendix II Site Photographs Date: 11.04.2017 Taken by: S&ME Project No.: 7435-17-044 Photo Page 1 View of S2 facing upstream.View of S4 facing upstream. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of S6 facing downstream.View of S5 facing downstream. PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, NC View of S11 facing upstream.View of S7 facing downstream. Date: 11.04.2017 Taken by: S&ME Project No.: 7435-17-044 Photo Page 2 View of S12 facing upstream.View of S15 facing upstream. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of S18 facing upstream.View of S17 facing downstream. PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, NC View of S20 facing upstream.View of S19 facing downstream. Date: 11.04.2017 Taken by: S&ME Project No.: 7435-17-044 Photo Page 3 View of S21 facing upstream.View of S24 facing upstream. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of S26 facing upstream.View of S25 facing upstream. PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, NC View of S29 facing downstream.View of S28 facing upstream. Date: 11.04.2017 Taken by: S&ME Project No.: 7435-17-044 Photo Page 4 View of S30 facing upstream.View of WB facing north. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of WF facing east.View of WD facing east. PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, NC View of WM facing north.View of WL facing west. Date: 11.04.2017 Taken by: S&ME Project No.: 7435-17-044 Photo Page 5 View of WQ facing south.View of WR facing south. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View of WT facing east.View of WS facing north. PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, NC View of WW facing south.View of WV facing west. Appendix III Completed PCN and Authorization to Act as Agent Page 1 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 4133 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: PNG Line 442 2b. County: Forsyth 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Kernersville 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: N/A 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Linear Utility Project - Multiple Property Owners - see attached list in Appendix I 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 2 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: Utility Company 4b. Name: Piedmont Natural Gas 4c. Business name (if applicable): Tom Morris, PE 4d. Street address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive 4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28210 4f. Telephone no.: 704.249.5279 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: tom.morris@piedmontng.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Joey Lawler, PWS 5b. Business name (if applicable): S&ME, Inc. 5c. Street address: 9751 Southern Pine Blvd 5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28273 5e. Telephone no.: 704.604.6474 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: jlawler@smeinc.com Page 3 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Linear utility project - multiple properties 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.147941° Longitude: - - 80.123498° (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: ~ 91 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Multiple unnamed tributaries to Frazier Creek, Mill Creek, Lowery Creek, Martin Mill Creek, Belews Creek, East Belews Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Frazier Creek = C; Mill Creek = C, Lowery Creek = WS III, Martin Mill Creek = WS III, Belews Creek = WS IV, CA, East Belews Creek = C 2c. River basin: Yadkin 03040101 and Roanoke 03010103 Page 4 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The project vicinity consists of a mixture of woodland, fields and land developoed with residential, commercial and light industrial land uses. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: Approximately 1.67 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Approximately 1,882 LF 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: PNG is planning to install an approximately 8.4-mile segment of natural gas transmission pipeline within a proposed 50- foot wide permanent easement. The purpose of the project is to “loop” the aforementioned segment of their existing pipeline, thereby creating additional capacity and strengthening reliability of the system for the service area. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces, etc. The new pipe will be installed in an existing 50-foot wide easement, with an additonal 25-50 of temporary work space (TWS) Part of the TWS will be eliminated at stream and most wetland crossings. In wetland areas, efforts will be made to remove surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary, temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one side of the easement to facilitate equipment passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands. Appropriate sediment and erosion control (S&EC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features. No grubbing or below-ground vegetation removal will occur within the wetlands or along stream banks within the construction corridor. Where the pipe will be installed by conventional means (e.g. “open-trench” or “isolation”), excavation will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the trench line. Select portions of the easement may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably-level work surface. Within the wetland area, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for equipment where extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur. Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary S&EC measures, the trench will be excavated along the “non-working” side of the easement. Subsurface disturbance will only be conducted within the trench line at wetlands and stream crossings. In certain areas, including the wetlands, fields or lawns, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water. In general, lengths of the pipe will be trucked to the site from a temporary storage yard, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together, x-rayed, the structural integrity and surface coating inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or “padding” to prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be “cleaned up” by rough-grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre-disturbance contours and conditions. All work within the wetland and the streams will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permits. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help prevent siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S. Equipment used will consits of indusrty standard earth moving and pipe laying equipment such as mechanized excavators, side booms, bull dozers, etc. Page 5 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. N/A 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. N/A 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 6 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W2 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: See Wetland Impact Table attached. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S2 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S3 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S4 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S5 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S6 P T PER INT Corps DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: See Stream Impact Table attached. Page 7 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T O2 P T O3 P T O4 P T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: No open water impacts will occur. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Yes No B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: No buffer impacts will occur Page 8 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See cover letter for details. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. See cover letter for details. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.464 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: See attached letter from NC DMS 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. N/A Page 9 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). N/A 6h. Comments: N/A Page 10 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project will not result in additional impervious surface. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: N/A 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 11 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: N/A Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. The project is not considered "growth-inducing" and its purpose to strengthen flow to an existing service area. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The project will not generate wastewater that requires treatment. Page 12 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/ 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? See attached NC SHPO letter.. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will comply with local floodplain development requirements. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA mappping Joey Lawler, PWS Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 03.26.18 Date Appendix IV Impact Drawings $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$SS S S S S S S AA A A A A A AGGGGGGGGSSAAGG WB S2 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.101 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S2 Stream Cross ing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S2 UT to Fra zier Creek 36.155 586°N -80 .1 80521°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 164 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Southern area of temp orary impact isrequired for pipe stringing for the HDDinstallation un der Ne w Walkertown Rd /Wetland WD. 164 LE GEND TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PRO PO SED PI PE CENTERLINE PRO PO SED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WE S4 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.111 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S4 (Frazier Creek ) S tream Crossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S4 Fra zier Creek 36.150 920°N -80 .1 70024°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 67 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. None. 67 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $ $ $$$$ $ $ $$WG WF S6 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.121 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S6 Stream Cross ing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S6 UT to Lowe ry Mill Creek 36.149 710°N -80 .1 60349°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 79 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Non-perpen dicular crossing (due toparalleling o f adjac ent power line). 79 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S5 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.131 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S5 (Lowery Mi ll Creek) S tream Crossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S5 Lowery Mill Creek 36.148 326°N -80 .1 58981°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 156 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Northe rn area of te mporary impact isrequired for pipe stringing for the HDDinstallation un der Reidsville Road. 156 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$WI S7 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.141 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S7 Stream Cross ing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S7 UT to Lowe ry Mill Creek 36.147 962°N -80 .1 55902°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 276 Tempo rary disturban ce; HDD pipelinecrossing. Tempo rary disturbance due to HDDequipment access. 276 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$ $ $$$$$$$$$$$ $ S S S S S S S A A A A A A A G G G G G G G S SAAGG WM OW1 S11 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.151 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S11 (Martin Mil l Creek) St ream Crossin g ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S11 Ma rtin Mill Creek 36.148 429°N -80 .1 37460°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 27 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d ~2 0'-35' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained. 27 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND OP EN WATER LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $$$$$$$ $ $ $ $ $ S17A S16S17 S15 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.161 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S15 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S15 UT to Belews Creek 36.146 672°N -80 .1 24812°W Intermittent R3UB Riv erine 0 65 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. None. 65 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PRO PO SED HDD $$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$S S S A A A G G G S S S S S S S A A A A A A A G G G G G G G S17 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.171 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S17 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S17 UT to Belews Creek 36.147 821°N -80 .1 21270°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 89 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. Non-perpend ic ular c ro ssing (due to use ofexisting ROW). 89 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $ $$$$$ $ $$ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $$ S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WQ WR S18 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.181 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S18 (Belews Creek ) S tream Crossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S18 Belews Creek 36.146 514°N -80 .11 3539°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 101 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. Non-perpend ic ular c ro ssing (due to use ofexisting ROW). 101 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WS S19 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.191 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S19 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S19 UT to Belews Creek 36.145 955°N -80 .1 09224°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 66 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. 66 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G S20 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.201 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S20 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S20 UT to Belews Creek 36.145 887°N -80 .1 07759°W Intermittent R3UB Riv erine 0 26 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained.Juris dictio nal origin is within workspace. 26 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $$ $ $ $ S S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G G WT S22 S21 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.211 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S21 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S21 UT to Belews Creek 36.145 278°N -80 .1 02334°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 58 Tempo rary disturbance / equipmentaccess. Non-perpen dicular impacts (due toparalleling o f existing ROW). 58 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $$ S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G S S A A G G WT S22 S24 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.221 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S24 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S24 UT to Belews Creek 36.144 853°N -80 .1 01250°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 101 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. Non-perpend ic ular c ro ssing (due to use ofexisting ROW). 101 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WU S26 S25 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.231 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S25 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S25 UT to Belews Creek 36.142 324°N -80 .0 92279°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 67 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. 67 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WU S25 S26 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.241 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S26 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S26 UT to Belews Creek 36.142 164°N -80 .0 91590°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 154 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. Non-perpend ic ular c ro ssing (due to use ofexisting ROW). 154 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$ $ $ $ $ S S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G G WW S27 S28 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.251 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S28 (E ast Belews Creek) Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S28 East Belews Creek 36.137 414°N -80 .0 64392°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 66 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additional ROWwill b e permanen tly maintained. 66 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$SS S S S S S S S SSAAA A A A A A A AAGGG G G G G G G GGWX S29 S30 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.261 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S29 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S29 UT to East Belews Creek 36.134 329°N -80 .0 58290°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 75 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Non-perpen dicular crossing (due to useof ex is ting p ip eline ROW). 75 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S SSSSS A A A A A AAAAA G G G G G GGGGG WX S29 S30 Stre am Crossing ID Loca l W a terw a y Longitude La titude Flow Re gime Cow a rdin Cla ssifica tion HGM Code LF in ROW LF Pe rma nent Impa ct LF Te mpora ry Impact Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.271 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \10-27_StreamImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:S30 Stream Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. S30 UT to East Belews Creek 36.134 017°N -80 .0 58008°W Pere nnial R3UB Riv erine 0 245 Tempo rary disturbance / trenchedpipeline crossing. Non-perpen dicular crossing (due to useof ex is ting p ip eline ROW). 245 LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE TEMPORARY ST REAM IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PA RCELS PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$SS S S S S S S S AA A A A A A A AG G G G G G G G GSSAAGG WB S2 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.281 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WB Wetl and Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WB UT to Fra zier Creek 3 6.155654°N -8 0.180420°W HEADWATER FOREST PFO RIVERINE 0.0 21 0.0 63 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co nditio n. Southern area oftemporary impac t is re quired for pipestringing for the HDD installation underNew Walkertown Rd / Wetland WD. PRO PO SED PI PE CENTERLINE PROPOSED HDD $$$$$S S S S S S S A A A A A A A G G G G G G G WD S3 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.291 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WD Wet land Crossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WD UT to Fra zier Creek 3 6.154856°N -8 0.176627°W HEADWATER FOREST PFO RIVERINE 0.0 66 0.0 00 Perma nen t con version of forestedvegetation to emergen t in new utilitycorridor. Pip e to be ins ta lled via HDD. PROPOSED HDD $ $ $ $$$ $ $ $$WG WF S6 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.301 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WF Wetland Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WF UT to Lowe ry Mill Creek 3 6.149743°N -8 0.160305°W HEADWATER FOREST PFO RIVERINE 0.0 44 0.0 13 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $ $$$ S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WM WL S I R I S AAC CT DITCH SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.311 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WL Wetland Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WL UT to Martin Mill Creek 3 6.148533°N -8 0.138892°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM RIVERINE 0.0 07 0.0 46 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $$ $ $$$$$$$$$ $ $$$$ S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WM OW1 S I R I S AAC CT DITCH S11 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.321 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WM Wetland Cros sing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND OP EN WATER We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WM Ma rtin Mill Creek 3 6.148478°N -8 0.137877°W BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD PEM/PFO RIVERINE 0.0 48 0.0 91 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Pip elin e will b e lo cated partially nearedge o f exis ting ROW and 20'-35' ofadditional ROW will be permanentlymaintained. Cleared temporaryworkspaces will be permitted torevegetate na tu rally back to originalcondition. PROPOSED HDD $$$$$S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G WN S12 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.331 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WN Wet land C rossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WN UT to Martin Mill Creek 3 6.148324°N -8 0.136481°W HEADWATER FOREST PFO RIVERINE 0.0 00 0.0 04 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /cons truc tion v ehicle crossing. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $ $$$ $$ $$$$$ $ $$ $$ $ $ $ S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WQ S18 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.341 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WQ Wet land C rossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WQ Belews Creek 3 6.146558°N -8 0.113735°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM RIVERINE 0.0 00 0.0 94 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing. Wetland isemergent in n ew pro posed easement. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $ $$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WQ WR S18 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.351 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WR Wet land C rossi ng ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WR Belews Creek 3 6.146311°N -8 0.112529°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM RIVERINE 0.0 00 0.0 69 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing. Wetland isemergent in n ew pro posed easement. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WS S19 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.361 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WS Wetland Crossin g ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WS UT to Belews Creek 3 6.145938°N -8 0.109195°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM/PFO RIVERINE 0.0 35 0.0 73 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $ $ $$$$$ S S S S A A A A G G G G S S S S S S S A A A A A A A G G G G G G G WT S22 S21 S24 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.371 " = 8 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 80 160(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WTa Wet land Cross ing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WTa UT to Belews Creek 3 6.145325°N -8 0.102247°W SEEP PFO/PEM RIVERINE 0.0 25 0.1 55 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PRO PO SED HDD $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $ $ S S A A G G S S S S S S S A A A A A A A G G G G G G G S A G WT S23 S22 S24 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.381 " = 6 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 60 120(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WTb Wetland Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WTb UT to Belews Creek 3 6.144819°N -8 0.101241°W BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD PFO/PEM RIVERINE 0.1 36 0.3 13 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WU S26 S25 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.391 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WU Wetland Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WU UT to Belews Creek 3 6.142280°N -8 0.092020°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM/PFO RIVERINE 0.0 61 0.1 09 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PRO PO SED HDD S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G WV OW1 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.401 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WV Wetland Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT WET LAND OP EN WATER We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WV UT to Belews Creek 3 6.140717°N -8 0.084818°W NON-TIDAL FRESHWATER MARSH PEM RIVERINE 0.0 00 0.0 99 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing. Wetland isemergent in n ew pro posed easement. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PRO PO SED HDD $$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A A G G G G G G G G G G WW WHISPERING BROOK RDS27 S28 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.411 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WW Wetland Cros sing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE EXIS TING PNG EASEMENT CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WW UT to East Belews Creek 3 6.137680°N -8 0.064896°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM/PFO RIVERINE 0.0 05 0.0 21 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Pip elin e will b e lo cated near edge ofexisting ROW an d 20' of additionalROW will be pe rman ently maintained.Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co ndition. PROPOSED HDD $ $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S S S S S S S SSSSA A A A A A A AAAAG G G G G G G GGGGWX S29 S30 SC ALE: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER FIG URE NO.421 " = 5 0 ' 3-19 -18 7435 -17-044 LI NE 442 P IP E L INE PROJECTPIEDMONT NATURAL GASFORSYTH C O UN T Y, N ORTH CAROLINA Dr awing Path: Q:\7435\17\044 PNG Line 442\DATA\GIS\shp \PCN \28-42_WetlandImpacts8X11.mxd plotted by DHomans 03-19-2018 0 50 100(FE ET) JU RIS DICTIONA L IMPACTS:WX Wet lan d Crossing ³ REFERENCE:JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WA S DET ER MIN ED USIN G GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY,BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED L AND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPELOCATIONS WE RE PROVID ED BY H GA. THIS MAP IS F OR IN FOR MAT ION AL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONSDISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BA SED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. LE GEND PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE LIMITS OF DIS TURBANCE PERMANENT WE TLAND CONVERSION TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TEMPORARY WORKSPACE NEW PERMAN ENT EASEMENT SAG EXIS TING GAS PIPELINE CULVERT $STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BANKS WET LAND We tla nd Crossing ID Local W a te rw a y Longitude La titude W AM Cla ssifica tion Cow a rdin Cla ssfica tion HGM Code Acre s Pe rma ne nt Impa ct Acres Te mpora ry Impa ct Impa ct De scription Additiona l Note s WX UT to East Belews Creek 3 6.134053°N -8 0.058041°W HEADWATER FOREST PEM/PFO RIVERINE 0.0 16 0.0 58 Tempo rary groun d disturbance /tr enc hed pipe line c ro ssing / permanentconversion of fores ted vegetation toemergent in n ew utility corridor. Cle are d te mp orary wo rkspaces will bepermitted to reve getate naturally back tooriginal co nditio n. W etland is currentlyemergent in s outhern part of new ROW. PROPOSED HDD Appendix V Typical Stream and Wetland Involvement Details ■■■■■■■■■■■■STEEL OR LOG STRINGER TO BE DESIGNED BY AN ENGINEER TO SUPPORT EXPECTED LOADS BRIDGE LENGTH (40-FEET MAX) 6-INCH CURB OR HIGHER TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS TEMPORARY BRIDGE DECK WIDTH FOR WIDEST EQUIPMENT NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (TYP.) UNDERSIDE OF BRIDGE DECK MUST BE WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO PREVENT SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS FROM PUSHING THROUGH THE CRACKS BETWEEN DECK TIMBERS. BRIDGE APPROACH TO BE ADEQUATELY STABILIZED USE CORDUROY OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL TO FORM STABLE APPROACH ROADS WHERE NECESSARY TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENT CURB DECKSTREAM FLOW TEMPORARY BRIDGE NOTES: THE FOLLOWING IS A SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION AND MIGRATION MEASURES TO BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TEMPORARY BRIDGE CROSSINGS. 1.A PRE-FABRICATED BRIDGE OR FLATBED RAILCAR , FLEXI-FLOAT OR FLUMED VEHICLE CROSSING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE TEMPORARY BRIDGE. 2.INSTALL THE BRIDGE IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE SEDIMENT ENTERING THE WATER. STRINGERS MUST BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE LOADS EXPECTED ON THE BRIDGE. CURBS AT LEAST 6-INCH HIGH MUST BE INSTALLED ALONG THE EDGE OF THE DECK TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE. FASTENERS CONNECTING COMPONENTS MUST BE STRONG ENOUGH TO HOLD THEM IN POSITION DURING THE LIFE OF THE BRIDGE. TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENTS MAY BE FILLED WITH ROCK OR COBBLE, OR MAY BE SOLID TIMBER ROTATED 90 DEGREES IN ALTERNATIVE LAYERS. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION IS TO BE PLACED AROUND THE CRIBS AND ON ANY FILL SLOPES PROJECTING INTO THE WATER, IF SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY PERMIT. 3.ROAD APPROACHES LEADING TO THE BRIDGE MUST BE RAISED AND STABLE SO EQUIPMENT LOADS ARE SUPPORTED A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BACK FROM THE WATER TO REDUCE POTENTIAL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ENTERING THE STREAM FROM EQUIPMENT TRACKS. DO NOT USE SOIL TO CONSTRUCT OR STABILIZE EQUIPMENT BRIDGES. IF CUTS ARE NEEDED TO OBTAIN A SATISFACTORY GRADE, THEY ARE TO BE EXCAVATED WITH SIDE DITCHES AND STABLE SLOPES. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP SEDIMENT ON LAND (E.G., SILT FENCING, FILTER CLOTH, RIP-RAP, SEED AND MULCH, ETC.). 4.PERIODICALLY CHECK BRIDGE INSTALLATION AND REMOVE ANY BUILT-UP SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE. 5.BRIDGES SHOULD BE SECURELY ANCHORED AT ONE END USING STEEL CABLE OR CHAIN TO PREVENT THE BRIDGE FROM FLOATING DOWNSTREAM AND POSSIBLY CAUSING AN OBSTRUCTION TO THE FLOW. ANCHORING AT ONLY ONE END WILL PREVENT CHANNEL OBSTRUCTION IN THE EVENT THAT FLOOD WATERS FLOAT THE BRIDGE. ACCEPTABLE ANCHORS ARE LARGE TREES, BOULDERS, OR DRIVEN STEEL ANCHORS. 6.TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENTS SHOULD BE PLACED PARALLEL TO, AND ON, STABLE BANKS SUCH THAT THE STRUCTURE IS AT OR ABOVE BANKFULL DEPTH TO PREVENT ENTRAPMENT OF FLOATING MATERIALS AND DEBRIS. STEEL OR LOG STRINGER UNDISTURBED STREAM BANK CROSS-SECTION A-A' BRIDGE PROFILE SILT FENCE A'A LOCATE SO TRENCHING DOES NOT AFFECT BRIDGE TRENCH TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK TOP OF BANK PLAN VIEW RIPRAP TOE PROTECTION (IF NECESSARY) TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENT SET BACK MIN. 6.5-FEET FROM TOP OF BANKMIN. 6.5-FEETENSURE ADEQUATE OPENING TO ALLOW ANTICIPATED INCREASE IN STREAM DISCHARGE ROCK OR COARSE GRAVEL FILL STREAM FLOW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHWM) TYPICAL TEMPORARY BRIDGE DETAIL NOT TO SCALEQ:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D1 TEMPORARY BRIDGE Jan 02, 2018 JCroweTYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD1 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 PERMANENT EASEMENT / WORKSPACE(VARIES, GENERALLY 65')STREAM FLOW SILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING NOTES: 1.LIMIT DISTURBANCE WIDTH TO 50-FEET OR LESS AT STREAM CROSSINGS WITHIN 50-FOOT WIDE EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLAN VIEW DRAWINGS. 2.REFER TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS. 3.PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF NATIONWIDE PERMIT 12. A COPY OF THESE PERMIT CONDITIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES. 4.INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20-FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 5.SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM CROSSING WILL TAKE PLACE, AND THEN PROMPTLY REPLACED FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION.TOP OF BANKTOE OF BANK 20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN. 10-FEET MIN. 10-FEET MIN. PRE-CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SC Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D2 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING Jan 02, 2018 JCroweTYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD2 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 SILT BAG PUMP AROUND HOSE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. TEMPORARY BRIDGE TRENCHPLUGTRENCHPLUGTOP OF BANKSEDIMENT TUBE OR EARTHEN BERM SCREENED INTAKE SILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) PROPOSED PIPELINE TRENCH DEWATERING HOSE TRENCHPERMANENT EASEMENT /WORKSPACE (VARIES, GENERALLY65')STREAM FLOW DURING CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING STREAM BED SUBSTRATE SPOILS SUBGRADE SPOIL PILE PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING NOTES: 1.LIMIT DISTURBANCE WIDTH TO 50-FEET OR LESS AT STREAM CROSSINGS WITHIN 50-FOOT WIDE EXISTING OR PROPOSED EASEMENT OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLAN VIEW DRAWINGS. 2.REFER TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL PERMITS. 3.PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF NATIONWIDE PERMIT 12. A COPY OF THESE PERMIT CONDITIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES. 4.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. REFER TO COFFER DAM DETAIL FOR HEIGHT AND OTHER SPECIFICATIONS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG PLACED ON APPROPRIATE E&SC MEASURE. INSTALL SILT FENCE ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. 6.SCREEN PUMP INTAKES TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE. PLACE PUMP INTAKE UPSTREAM OF UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. PLACE BYPASS HOSE OUTSIDE OF STREAM BANKS WITH DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM BEFORE COMMENCING BYPASS. TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT STREAMBED SCOUR AT PUMP DISCHARGE. TAKE REASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT INTAKE FROM SUCTIONING THE STREAM SUBSTRATE. 7.THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMAL STREAM FLOW. STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORS CAPABLE OF HANDLING 100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE IN CASE OF PUMP FAILURE OR A RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR THE DAM AND PUMPS TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION THROUGHOUT THE WATERBODY CROSSING. ALL PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS. 8.ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ON PERMITTED PLANS. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20-FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 9.LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS AND WITHIN 10-FEET OF TOP OF BANK. 10.STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANTICIPATED RAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING, INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE. 11.CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE MORNING, PIPE INSTALLATION AND STREAMBANK RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE. 13.NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS, WETLANDS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON THE PERMITTED DRAWINGS. 14.ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE AND CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. 15.IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED. 16.ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS & WETLANDS AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.■TYPICAL PUMP BY-PASS STREAM CROSSING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE COFFER DAM TOE OF BANKSC Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D3 PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING Jan 02, 2018 JCroweTYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD3 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 COFFER DAM FLUME STREAM CROSSING NOTES: 1.REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 2.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES. 3.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20 MIL HDPE LINER. CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER METHODS FOLLOWING APPROVAL FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR AND THE OWNER. 4.THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + 1-FEET WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK WITH A 2-FEET MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT. ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.CONTACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG. INSTALL 12-INCH COMPOST FILTER SOCK ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS. 6.INSTALL FLUME PIPE AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12-INCHES OF COVER OR 1 3 DIAMETER OF PIPE FOR FLUMES GREATER THAN 36-INCH IN DIAMETER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SIZE FLUME PIPE TO ADEQUATELY ACCOMMODATE BANK FULL FLOWS. ALIGN FLUME PIPE(S) TO PREVENT BANK EROSION AND STREAMBED SCOUR. 7.ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20-FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 8.LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS AND WITHIN 10-FEET OF TOP OF BANK. 9.STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" DURING LOW FLOW CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID ANTICIPATED RAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING, INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE. 10.CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE MORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE. 12.DO NOT REMOVE FLUME PIPE DURING TRENCHING, PIPELAYING, OR BACKFILLING ACTIVITIES, OR INITIAL STREAMBED RESTORATION EFFORTS. 13.NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS,WETLANDS, OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 14.ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. 15.IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED. 16.ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED STREAMS AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. 17.ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OF WHETHER PUMP AROUND OR FLUME STREAM CROSSING METHOD IS TO BE USED.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■TRENCHBREAKERTRENCHBREAKER20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. TEMPORARY BRIDGE STREAM FLOW SEDIMENT TUBE OR EARTHEN BERM SILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) PROPOSED PIPELINE TRENCH DEWATERING HOSE TRENCHPERMANENT EASEMENT /WORKSPACE (VARIES, GENERALLY 65')STREAM BED SUBSTRATE SPOILS SUBGRADE SPOIL PILEFLUMEPIPESILT BAG TOP OF BANKTOE OF BANKDURING CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL FLUME STREAM CROSSING TYPICAL FLUME STREAM CROSSING DETAIL (OPTIONAL) NOT TO SCALE SC Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D4 FLUME STREAM CROSSING Jan 02, 2018 JCrowe, TYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD 4 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 POST-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING NOTES: 1.REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP REQUIREMENTS. 2.FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. 3.ONCE ORIGINAL STREAM BANK CONTOURS HAVE BEEN RE-ESTABLISHED TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, DISTURBED STREAM BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX (SEE RIPARIAN SEED SPECIFICATIONS), AND COIR MATTING WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: MINIMUM SHEAR STRENGTH VALUE >/= TO 2.25 LBS/SQ. FT. AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER 4.COIR MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM 10 FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL MATTING IN STREAM BED. RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM 50-FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. 5.ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM CROSSING ARE COMPLETE, EXTEND SILT FENCE ACROSS THE ENTIRE EASEMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE BANK AND PARALLEL TO THE STREAM. 6.PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 35-FEET IN WIDTH. CROSS-SECTION 10-FEET MIN. PLAN VIEW ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■TRENCHBREAKERCOIR MATTING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS EXTEND COIR MATTING 10-FEET LANDWARD FROM TOP OF BANK INSTALL COIR MATTING (SEE NOTE 3) 5-FEET MIN. BACKFILLED PROPOSED PIPELINE 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 10-FEET MIN. 10-FEET MIN.PERMANENT EASEMENT / WORKSPACE(VARIES, GENERALLY 65')STREAM FLOW TRENCHBREAKERTRENCHBREAKERTRENCHBREAKERSILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) INSTALL COIR MATTING (SEE NOTE 3)TOP OF BANKTOE OF BANKRIPARIAN SEEDING AREA TO EXTEND A MIN. OF 10-FEET LANDWARD TYPICAL POST CONSTRUCTION STREAM DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SC Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D5 POST-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING Jan 02, 2018 JCroweTYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 TYPICAL COFFER DAM DETAIL NOT TO SCALESEE NOTE 220 MIL HDPE LINER SANDBAGS FLOW GENERAL NOTES : 1.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20 MIL HDPE LINER OR CLEAN STEEL PLATE DRIVEN INTO THE STREAM BANKS AND STREAM BED. USE SANDBAGS TO SHORE STEEL PLATE IF NEEDED. 2.THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED USING BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS. ·H/4 + 1' (H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK IN FEET) WITH A 2-FEET MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT ·BASE FLOW + 1' (BASE FLOW TO BE IDENTIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) THE GREATER OF THE TWO RESULTING HEIGHTS SHALL BE USED FOR THE COFFER DAM. ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF SANDBAG COFFER DAM. 4.SAND BAGS SHOULD BE PLACED ALONG THE EDGES OF THE COFFER DAM TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING AROUND THE COFFER DAM.A-A' 3' MIN.SEE NOTE 2A' A SECTION VIEW Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D6 COFFER DAM Jan 02, 2018 JCrowe6TYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 TYPICAL WETLAND CROSSING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE WC■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ PRE-CONSTRUCTION ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 20-FEET MIN.TRENCHBREAKERWETLAND SUBSOIL PILE WETLAND TOPSOIL PILE WETLAND TIMBER MATS 20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. SILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) 10-FEET MIN. (UNLESS OTHERWISE DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)PERMANENT EASEMENT /WORKSPACE (VARIES, GENERALLY 65')10-FEET MIN. (UNLESS OTHERWISE DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS) 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 20-FEET MIN.20-FEET MIN. 18" DIA. COMPOST FILTER SOCK OR EARTHEN BERM TRENCHTRENCHBREAKER10-FEET MIN. (UNLESS OTHERWISE DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)10-FEET MIN. (UNLESS OTHERWISE DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS) PROPOSED PIPELINE PERMANENT EASEMENT /WORKSPACE (VARIES, GENERALLY 65')SILT FENCE (INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD) WETLAND CROSSING NOTES : 1.REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP REQUIREMENTS. 2.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND COMPLEX. 3.INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING (PRE-CONSTRUCTION). 4.INSTALL TIMBER MATS FOR TRAVEL LANE THROUGH WETLAND AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 -FEET LANDWARD FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS WILL BE CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS, LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS. 5.NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE PERMITTED DISTURBANCE LIMITS . DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS AREA. 6.DURING EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS, THE SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 7.BASED ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR MAY DETERMINE ADDITIONAL MEASURES SUCH AS 12-INCH DIAMETER COMPOST FILTER SOCKS MAY BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE WETLAND AT THE PERIMETER OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR OFFSITE SEDIMENTATION. 8.SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCK PILING EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK. REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH. 9.ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. 10.FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS. 11.FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE SEED MIX (SEE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SPECIES AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED WETLANDS AND EXTEND 10-FEET LANDWARD FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY . 12.DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS WITHIN WETLANDS. WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1.INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THAT EXCEEDS 0.5 INCHES WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 2.REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN. 3.REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED. DURING CONSTRUCTION WETLAND NATIVE WETLAND SEEDING AREA GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SILT BAG PLAN VIEW SYMBOL Q:\7435\17\015 hga clemmons - line 328 upgrade\DWG\construction\PCN\743517015_DET_NR_Typicals.dwg-D7 PRE-CONSTRUCTION WETLAND CROSSING Jan 02, 2018 JCrowe, 7TYPICAL DETAILS PNG LINE 442 PIPELINE PROJECTFORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAD 01/02/2018 PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSINGNTS 7435-17-0 44 Appendix VI Agency Scoping Responses United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B Asheville, North Carolina 28801 October 17, 2017 Mr. Joey Lawler S&ME, Inc. 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Dear Mr. Lawler: Subject: Federally Listed Species Assessment, Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) Line 442 Project, located in Kernersville, Forsyth County, North Carolina (S&ME Project No. 7435-17- 044) Dear Mr. Lawler: On August 30, 2017, we received (via e-mail) a copy of your Information Request letter requesting our review and comments on the subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et seq.) (NEPA); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). According to the information that you presented, PNG is proposing to install about 8.4-miles of natural gas pipeline. A majority of the new line will be installed adjacent to an existing natural gas transmission utility easement. Aside from the existing natural gas transmission line easement adjacent to the proposed pipeline, land use in the project area consists or residential and commercial development, and forested areas. Your letter indicates that temporary impacts to streams and/or wetlands may occur with construction of the project and that efforts will be made to avoid and minimize impacts where practicable. However, you did not include specific details or plans regarding the proposed amount of aquatic impacts or measures that would be used to minimize/avoid impacts to aquatic resources. The construction of the project will be conducted in accordance with Nationwide Permit No.12 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Federally Listed Species.The project site contains potential suitable habitat for northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), which is currently federally listed as a threatened species. The clearing of trees for construction of the project, staging areas, easements, etc. could impact suitable maternity roost trees for northern long-eared bats. However, no known maternity roosts or hibernacula sites are within 45 miles of the project site. According to the new 4(d) rule implemented for the listing of northern long-eared bat, a cutting moratorium of June 1-July 31 should be observed within areas of Mr. Joey Lawler - S&ME, Inc.2 habitat for this species. Because: 1) the project site is over 45-miles away from the nearest known occurrence; and 2) there is a large amount of suitable habitat in close proximity to the site and in the surrounding area, we believe the probability of “take” that could occur from this project is discountable. We recommend the cutting moratorium of June 1-July 31 be implemented into the plans if possible. Though a “not likely to adversely affect” determination would not be dependent on this action, the cutting moratorium is a measure that can be implemented to further reduce the probability of “take” of this species. We believe the project will have “no effect” on all other federally listed species known to occur in Forsyth County. Thus, we believe the requirements for under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. Utility Line Crossings.In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility crossings (i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure (including manholes) should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. We recommend that PNG assess every stream and wetland crossing associated with the project for HDD installation. If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method, every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in-stream features are minimized and stable upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open-trench crossings indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In-stream work should avoid the spring fish-spawning season and should consider forecasted high-flow events. Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in order to identify any additional on-site impact-minimization measures. The Service may be available to assist you in this effort. To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every 3 months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project. Project Recommendations -We are concerned about the introduction and spread of invasive exotic species in association with the proposed project. Without active management, including the revegetation of disturbed areas with native species, project corridors will likely be sources of (and corridors for) the movement of invasive exotic plant species. Exotic species are a major contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat loss. Exotics are a factor contributing to the endangered or threatened status of more than 40 percent of the animals and plants on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.1 It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic plant species and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the United States, costing more 1D.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607-615. Mr. Joey Lawler - S&ME, Inc.3 than $130 billion a year to control.2 Additionally, the U.S. Government has many programs and laws in place to combat invasive species (see www.invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of Executive Order 13112 - Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to “not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere.” Despite their short-term erosion-control benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once they are established, thereby preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotic plants3 are also aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing already-established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species native to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of this project. We also recommend that seeds for native plants that are beneficial to pollinators be included in the erosion control seed mixes. Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, or other insects, including moths and butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and in the production of most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent of crops are pollinated by these pollinators. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North America by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees (which are not native to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a result of loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat and disease; while declines in honey bees has also been linked to disease. Because loss of habitat and diminished native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators throughout the country, we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or wetlands. To offset the overall impacts of development and/or to increase the habitat and species diversity within the project area, we further recommend the following measures be implemented into project design: 1. Throughout the site, sow native seed mixes with plant species that are beneficial to pollinators. Taller-growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide benefits to pollinators, habitat to ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small mammals. Low-growing/groundcover native species should be planted in areas that need to be maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the amount of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species (milkweed is an important host plant for monarch butterflies) is especially beneficial. The following Web site provides a comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators: http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MidAtlanticPlantList_web.pdf Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat requirements can be provided upon request.Attachment 1 of this letter includes a sample upland mix that can be used in conjunction with a fast growing erosion control seed mix 2D. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65. 3Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http://www.tneppc.org/and http://www.invasive.org/eastern/srs/ (exotic wildlife links) Mr. Joey Lawler - S&ME, Inc.4 for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits. We also offer our assistance with developing seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with fast growing erosion control seed mix for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits. 2. Implement a mowing and maintenance program that restricts mowing during the summer months. Mowing at the site should be restricted to the smallest area possible to manage the edges of the easement for early successional habitat. We recommend that PNG evaluate its maintenance plan to target ecological/habitat benefits to other wildlife species, especially pollinators and birds that require early successional habitats. One of the best ways to accomplish this objective is to use Integrated Vegetation Management (IVM) practice using low-volume herbicide applications when planning management activities. Pollinator nest sites in ROWs managed with IVM practices have been found to contain about 30% more pollinator nesting sites and species richness than traditionally mowed maintenance areas. Aside from removing problem vegetation, the primary focus should be placed on establishing compact flowering shrubs and managing for native grasses and wildflowers. The overall objective is to reach a sustainable level of grasses, forbs, and flowering shrubs (wherever feasible) throughout the project area. 3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend managing the pipeline easements in a manner that creates or maintains a diverse array of habitats to accommodate varied pollinators, from hummingbirds to butterflies to bees. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs while many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. Most bees nest in the ground and in wood or dry plant stems. For additional information and actions that can be taken to benefit pollinators please visit the following Web site: http://www.fws.gov/pollinators/pollinatorpages/yourhelp.html. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you have any questions, please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-548. Sincerely, - - original signed - - Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor Mr. Joey Lawler - S&ME, Inc.5 Attachment 1 – Sample Upland Meadow Seed Mix for NC Piedmont This is an example upland pollinator seed mix that is suitable for the project site. This list is not an all-inclusive list nor does a pollinator planting project need to include all of these species. I can help to customize a seed mix for the project area which could decrease costs if requested. •20% Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Sorghastrum nutans, NC Ecotype) •18% Beaked Panicgrass, SC Ecotype (Panicum anceps, SC Ecotype) •14% Little Bluestem, Piedmont NC Ecotype (Schizachyrium scoparium, Piedmont NC Ecotype) •10% Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype (Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype) •6% Purpletop, Southeastern VA Ecotype (Tridens flavus, Southeastern VA Ecotype) •3% Bigtop Lovegrass, VA Ecotype (Eragrostis hirsuta, VA Ecotype) •3% Blackeyed Susan, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Rudbeckia hirta, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype) •2.5% Sensitive Pea, NC Ecotype (Chamaecrista nictitans, NC Ecotype) •2% Lanceleaf Coreopsis, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Coreopsis lanceolata, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype) •2% Spiked Wild Indigo, NC Ecotype (Baptisia albescens, NC Ecotype) •2% Winter Bentgrass, NC Ecotype (Agrostis hyemalis, NC Ecotype) •2% Slender Bushclover, VA Ecotype (Lespedeza virginica, VA Ecotype) •2% Scaly Blazing Star, VA Ecotype (Liatris squarrosa, VA Ecotype) •2% Appalachian Beardtongue, SC Ecotype (Penstemon laevigatus, SC Ecotype) •2% Wild Quinine, NC Ecotype (Parthenium integrifolium, NC Ecotype) •2% Slender Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Sorghastrum elliottii, NC Ecotype) •1% Grassleaf Blazing Star, NC Ecotype (Liatris graminifolia (L. pilosa), NC Ecotype) •1% Mistflower, VA Ecotype (Eupatorium coelestinum (Conoclinium c.), VA Ecotype) •1% Splitbeard Bluestem, VA Ecotype (Andropogon ternarius, VA Ecotype) •1% Spotted Beebalm, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Monarda punctata, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype) •1% Orange Coneflower, Northern VA Ecotype (Rudbeckia fulgida var. fulgida, Northern VA Ecotype) •0.5% Late Purple Aster, NC Ecotype (Aster patens, NC Ecotype) •0.5% Wild Indigo, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Baptisia tinctoria, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype) •0.5% Anise Goldenrod, GA Ecotype (Solidago odora, GA Ecotype) •0.5% Gray Goldenrod, VA Ecotype (Solidago nemoralis, VA Ecotype) •0.5% Swamp (Narrowleaf) Sunflower, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Helianthus angustifolius, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype) Total: 100% NCNHDE-5372 February 16, 2018 Joey Lawler S&ME 9751 Southern Pine Blvd Charlotte, NC 29273 RE: PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project; 7435-17-044 Dear Joey Lawler: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These results are presented in the attached ‘Documented Occurrences’ tables and map. The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler@ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Project No. 7435-17-044 February 16, 2018 NCNHDE-5372 Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area Taxonomic Group EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Observation Date Element Occurrence Rank Accuracy Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Natural Community 33178 Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 B 2-High ------G4G5 S4 Natural Community 33177 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 BC 2-High ------G3G4 S4 Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating Kernersville Lake Park Hardwood Forest R5 (General)C5 (General) Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area* Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State Forsyth County Open Space Forsyth County: multiple local government Local Government *NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project. Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on February 16, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 4 Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Project No. 7435-17-044 February 16, 2018 NCNHDE-5372 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic Group EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Observation Date Element Occurrence Rank Accuracy Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Natural Community 33174 Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 C 2-High ------G3G4 S3S4 Natural Community 33178 Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 B 2-High ------G4G5 S4 Natural Community 28478 Dry Oak--Hickory Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 C 2-High ------G4G5 S4 Natural Community 33177 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ---2014-06-06 BC 2-High ------G3G4 S4 Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating Kernersville Lake Park Hardwood Forest R5 (General)C5 (General) Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Guilford County Open Space Guilford County: multiple local government Local Government NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement NC Department of Agriculture State Forsyth County Open Space Forsyth County: multiple local government Local Government Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on February 16, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 3 of 4 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 4 of 4 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation Division • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721 Telephone: (919) 707-0220 • Fax: (919) 707-0028 05 September 2017 Mr. Joey Lawler, PWS S&ME, Inc. 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Subject: Request for Environmental Information and Comment PNG Line 442 Project Forsyth County, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7435-17-044 Dear Mr. Lawler, Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) received your email on 30 August 2017 requesting review and comments regarding the PNG Line 442 Project. Biologists with NCWRC have reviewed the subject information. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.). Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) will be constructing an approximately 8.4-mile natural gas transmission pipeline in Forsyth County, North Carolina. The pipeline will originate on the south side of Walkertown Road northeast of Winston-Salem and terminate at North Main Street from Chaucer Manor Lane in Kernersville. The pipeline will be installed primarily in an existing utility easement; however, the construction of the pipeline will require some temporary impacts to jurisdiction streams and/or wetlands. We have no records of federally or state-listed species within or adjacent to the site. However, the lack of records from the project area does not imply or confirm the absence of federal or state protected species. An on-site survey is the only definitive means to determine if the proposed project would impact threatened and endangered species. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists the federally and state endangered small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera) and federally threatened and state significantly rare northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as having potential to occur within the project area if suitable habitat is present. We recommend contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at (828) 258-3939 to ensure that any issues related to these species are addressed. The proposed alignment occurs adjacent to NC Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Trust Fund Easement, Forsyth County Open Space, and Kernersville Lake Park Hardwood Forest. Known high-quality natural communities adjacent to the proposed alignment are a Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest, Dry Oak-Hickory Forest, Basic Mesic Forest, and a Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest; these natural communities occur within and adjacent to the Forsyth County Open Space. Page 2 5 September 2017 PNG Line 442 Project Forsyth County The NCWRC offers the following recommendations to further minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources. 1. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams, and a minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources, water quality, and aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area. Also, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater. 2. Pipelines should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. All utility crossings should be kept to a minimum, which includes careful routing design and the combination of utility crossings into the same right-of-way (provided there is not a safety issue). The directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the stream and buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever practicable, and the open cut stream crossing method should only be used when water level is low and stream flow is minimal. Stream crossings should be near perpendicular (75o to 105o) to stream flow. We recommend a minimum 100-foot setback for perennial streams and a 50-foot setback for intermittent streams and wetlands. 3. After construction, disturbed stream banks and wetlands should be restored to original contours and re-vegetated with native plant materials. Riprap may be used to stabilize the bank in the area of the ordinary high water stage and vegetation (bioengineering) should be used above this stage. Riprap should not be placed on the streambed. 4. Disturbed areas should be re-seeded with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife. Avoid fescue-based mixtures because fescue is invasive and provides little benefit to wildlife. Native, annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred and recommended. Consider planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the site. 5. Sediment and erosion control measures should be implemented prior to any land clearing or construction and maintained throughout project construction. The use of biodegradable and wildlife-friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose-weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained. Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (336) 290-0056 or olivia.munzer@ncwildlife.org. ec: Allen Ratzlaff, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Appendix VII Restoration Plan GENERAL RESTORATION PLAN PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project Forsyth County, North Carolina The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall be implemented to restore temporarily- affected wetlands and streams. This plan entails restoration of temporarily-disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions to the degree practicable upon project completion. No fills or spoils of any kind will be permanently placed within wetlands or along the stream banks. Further, disturbed wetland areas and streambanks will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover. The measures outlined below will be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the proposed project. Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and restoration of original pre- disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an upland site. Excavated topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be utilized within temporarily-disturbed streambanks and riparian areas. Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix Species Common Name Percentage Of Mix Agrostis Perennans Autumn Bentgrass 11 Andropogon Gerardii Big Bluestem 7 Elymus Canadensis Canada Wild Rye 2 Elymus Virginicus Virginia Wild Rye 15 Juncus Effusus Soft Rush 4 Panicum Virgatum Switchgrass 11 Schizachyrium Scoparium Little Bluestem 5 Sorghastrum Nutans Indiangrass 6 Tridens Flavus Purple Top 1 Tripsacum Dactyloides Eastern Gamagrass 6 Achillea Millefolium Common Yarrow 3 Asclepias Tuberosa Butterfly Weed 1 Bidens Aristosa Bidens 3 Chamaecrista Fasciculata Partridge Pea 2 Coreopsis Lanceolata Lanceleaf Coreopsis 7 Echinacea Purpurea Cone Flower 1 Gaillardia Pulchella Indian Blanket 2 Helianthus Angustifolius Swamp Sunflower 1 Helianthus Maximillanii Maximilian's Sunflower 1 Monarda Punctata Spotted Beebalm 1 Rudbeckia Hirta Blackeyed Susan 7 Senna Hebecarpa Wild Senna 1 Symphyotrichum Pilosum Heather Aster 1 Verbena Hastata Blue Vervain 1 General Restoration Plan Page 2 PNG Line 442 Pipeline Project 7435-17-044 Riparian Seed Mix is to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending 10 feet landward. The recommended application rate: 20 lbs. per acre. The native seed mix identified in Table 2 below will be utilized within temporarily-disturbed wetlands. Table 2: Wetland Seed Mix Species Common Name Percentage Of Mix Panicum Rigidulum Redtop Panicgrass 28 Panicum Anceps Beaked Panicgrass 20 Elymus Virginicus Virginia Wild Rye 16 Carex Lurida Lurid (Shallow) Sedge 8 Carex Lupulina Hop Sedge 7 Carex Squarrosa Squarrose Sedge 5 Juncus Effusus Soft Rush 3 Saururus Cernuus Lizard's Tail 2 Scirpus Cyperinus Woolgrass 2 Eupatorium Coelestinum Mistflower 2 Bidens Aristosa Showy Tickseed 2 Hibiscus Moscheutos Crimson Rosemallow 2 Juncus Tenuis Path Rush 1 Scirpus Atrovirens Green Bulrush 1 Vernonia Noveboracensis New York Ironweed 1 Wetland Seed Mix is to be applied to all disturbed wetland areas. In the event of overlap, wetland mix (Table 1) should be used. The recommended application rate: 20 lbs. per acre. To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be augmented with the appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 3. Table 3: Cover/Companion Crops Species Common Season Mix Notes: Secale cereale Cereal or Winter rye Early Spring or Fall 30 lbs/acre Grows 3-4' tall, but not a strong a competitor. Lolium perenne Perennial rye Early Fall or Spring 20-50% Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years, then dies out. Urocloa ramose Brown Top Millet Spring, Summer 20-50% Good germination; dies off with frost; does not tolerate mowing. Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical Stream and Wetland Crossing Details. Riparian and wetland seed mixes are available at: Mellow Marsh Farm 1312 Woody Store Road Siler City, N.C. 27344 919.742.1200 919.742.1280 fax www.mellowmarshfarm.com Appendix VIII Mitigation Credit Acceptance Letter