20180307 Ver 1_09-Stantec-Stevens_PJD_Submittal_20180227

(3 Stantec
September 12, 2017
Attention: David L. Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
DearMr. Shaeffer,
Reference: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Please find the attached Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request and supporting
documentation. This PJD is being submitted to support a Pre -construction Notification we are
currently developing for a Nationwide Permit (N W P) No. 27 for the Stevens Creek Stream
Restoration project in Mint -Hill, NC.
Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency (LU ESA) has contracted Stantec
Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) to design and permit a stream restoration design for Stevens
Creek from Thompson road to 1-485 and the unnamed tributary to Stevens Creek from the
confluence near the end of Beech Mint Driveto its confluence with Stevens Creek. The project will
repair and stabilize eroding stream banks and serve as a showcase project for the Mecklenburg
County Parks and recreation concurrent Stevens Creek Nature Preserve and associated science
center project. Mecklenburg Countyis working to secure final agreements with adjacent land
ROMWI IN
The project area (-84.2 ac) was delineated by Stantec on May4 and 5, 2016. There are sixteen
jurisdictional waters within the project area including nine jurisdictional streams (totaling 12,808 If)
and seven jurisdictional wetlands (totaling 3.31 ac). The two main perennial streams comprise a
majority of the overall stream length in the project studyarea, Stevens Creek (map I D SI) totals
7,250 If and the unnamed tributaryto Stevens Creek (map ID SB) totals 3,476 If of the total stream
length. The remaining seven streams consist of smaller intermittent and perennial tributaries of
streams SB and SI.
In addition, fourfeatures were assessed using the NCDWQstream form and determined to be
ephemeral. These ephemeral data points (E1-4) are displayed on Figure 5 maps.
Six of the seven wetlands are forested wetlands located along the floodplains of streams SB and
SI. The remaining wetland is classified as emergent due to the lack of woody vegetation and is
located along the downstream left bank side of streamSI.
An unpaired upland data point was taken along the right bank downstream section of streamSB
and adjacent to the communitywaste watertreatment facilityoff of Bexley Place in Oxford Glen
subdivision. The assessed area had standing water howeverthe soils and vegetation were found
Design with community in mind

N
September 12, 2017
David L. Shaeffer
Page 2 of 2
Reference: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
to not be hydric. The standing water is likely a result of rain events that occurred from the previous
weekend.
The attachment contains the JD request form, PJD request form, photos, USAC Ed ata forms,
NCDWQstream forms, vicinity map, USGS topoquad map, soils map, NWI map, and jurisdictional
features maps. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards,
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
-� /// ---
Alex Baldwin, LSS, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attachment: 1 copyof PJD packet
cc. USACE Charlotte Regulatory Field Office - [e-mail]
Mecklenburg County LU ESA- [e-mail]
Design with community in mind

Jurisdictional Determination Request
M
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (7D) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�„ulatoryPermitProaram.asi2x , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251-x}610
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-463 3
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
Multiple Parcels, See Attached
City, State:
Mint Hill, NC
County:
Mecklenburg
Directions:
(From Charlotte) Take US -74 E to Williams Rd in Matthews, NC. Fallow Williams Rd to Idlewild Rd.
Continue on Idlewild Rd to Thompson Rd. Left on Castleford or, left on Bexley PI and Left on Yarmouth Road.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See attached
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Alex Baldwin - Stantec Consulting Services
Mailing Address: 801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: 919-865-7583
Electronic Mail Addressi: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency
Mailing Address: 2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208
Telephone Number: 980-314-3210
Electronic Mail Address i: [e-mail]
Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/US4CEprot000ls, skip to Part E
5 Waters of the United nates
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 84.2 acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
Project Coordinates: 35.145064
Latitude -80.650075
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
7 USGS Topographic Map
W] Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Fbgulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑✓ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ❑✓ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Fbgional aipplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/avilWorks/RegulatorVProgramandPbrmitstreg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Pbrtalsl59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSW Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, onewetland datasheet for each wetland/oommunitytype.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved 7D must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundar i�picted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that thiscopy of this plat accurately depictsthe boundary of thejurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Qean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) yearsfrom
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
F;bgulatory Offidal:
Title:
Date:
US4CEAct ion ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Qean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five yearsfrom this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Fegional S.ipplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
F;bgulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
US4CEAct ion ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): September 16, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Alex Baldwin - 801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Stevens Creek Stream Restoration
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC
County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg
City: Mint Hill
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.145064 °N; Long. 80.650075
oW
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Stevens creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
12,808 linear feet: 3-15 width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: R3SB, R3UB, and R4SB
Stream Flow: Perennial and Intermittent
Wetlands: 3.31 acres.
Cowardin Class: PEM and PFO
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal: none
Non -Tidal: none

E
REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
❑✓ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K Mint Hill
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Mecklenburg County 1977
National wetlands Inventory map(s). Cite name: Mecklenburg 100K Quads
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): NADP 2015
❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2
or

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
11
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
9/16/2016

Estimated
Site
Cowardin
amount of
Class of Aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
number
Class
aquatic resource
Resource
in review area
Non -section 10
SA
35.151441
-80.653500
R4SB
38 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SB
35.146966
-80.651155
R3UB
3,476 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SC
35.142079
-80.650296
R4SB
72 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SD
35.139940
-80.652525
R3SB
240 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SE
35.139410
-80.655475
R4SB
17 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SF
35.139309
-80.655900
R3SB
651 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SG
35.140475
-80.658171
R3SB
269 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SH (Int)
35.143701
-80.645617
R4SB
31 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
SH (Per)
35.142833
-80.645345
R3SB
764 linear feet
non -wetland
SI
(Stevens
Non -section 10
Creek)
35.142733
-80.649707
R3UB
7,250 linear feet
non -wetland
Non -section 10
WA
35.149669
-80.652810
PFO
0.577 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WB
35.147844
-80.651797
PFO
0.063 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WC
35.144544
-80.649317
PFO
0.202 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WD
35.144089
-80.648568
PFO
0.322 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WE
35.143675
-80.646257
PFO
0.231 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WF
35.144087
-80.646321
PFO
0.154 acres
wetland
Non -section 10
WG
35.141306
-80.640221
PEM
1.762 acres
wetland

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. See attached PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: See attached.
Please print:
Property Owner: See attached
Property Owner:
attached
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Alex Baldwin, LSS, PWS , of Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Authorized Signature
Date: Date:

PIN
Deed Book
Deed Page
House Number
Street Name
Street Type
Municipality
Primary Owner First Name
Co-owner First Name
Co-owner Last Name
19508152
26978
870
4312
PHILIPS SPRING
CT
MINT HILL
19517104
12805
352
15325
BEXLEY
PL
MINT HILL
ORVICE
GLORIA ROBINSON(H/W)
19516203
10576
26
15100
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
WILLIAM E 1R
ROSE ANN
19517148
24891
862
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
19517146
27507
32
15122
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MARGARET RHYNE
LYNDA BIGHAM
EVANS
19514102
17932
980
THOMPSON
RD
UNINC
19510101
10105
273
14604
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
MEETAI
19521101
4773
650
14805
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
CAROL STEWART
19516205
28961
213
15022
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
19516206
19279
690
15016
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
JOSEPHINE
STEVEN M
ADAMS
19508105
28924
306
15401
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
W EDWARD JR
LISA
BROWNING
19517140
9277
598
15208
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
JERRY M JR
SHERRI H
MUSSELWHITE
19517131
28870
560
15352
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MORTGAGE CORP
19517134
13050
306
15332
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MARC T
MONICA S CALELLO (H/W)
19516209
6329
408
15000
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
DONALD A
ROBIN L
GRIFFIN
19517141
13846
682
15200
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
JAMESTJR
ROBIN W
BOYLES
19517133
8702
72
15340
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MICHAEL BRADLEY
NOREEN A
LITTLE
19523116
2042
270
HOOKS
RD
UNINC
WAYNE LAMAR
MARY K
SIGMON
19510136
5218
4
14642
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
CLYDE DANIEL
19517155
8064
520
15550
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
JAMES RJR
MITZI C
WIGGINS
19516204
23235
890
15030
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MICHELLE MARIE
19517138
8838
329
15300
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
KENNETH AUBREY
PAMELA SULLIVAN
19516226
10236
509
14801
BRIDGEWATER
LN
MINT HILL
WANDA
BYRON VILLANUEVA
19507105
28508
739
3401
MINTSTONE
DR
MINT HILL
CRAIG STEVEN
LEIGH CAINE
SMITH
19507115
5518
458
3401
BEECH MINT
DR
MINT HILL
DARRELLS
SANDRA P
HARRISON
19507114
17769
888
3400
BEECH MINT
DR
MINT HILL
SHARON LYNETTE
19517135
25110
329
15324
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MICHAELA
MEGHAN
GAFFNEY
19516208
12272
728
15004
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
TARRA G
JASON C DEAN (H/W)
19508157
26978
870
13511
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
19508153
26978
870
PHILIPS SPRING
CT
MINT HILL
19517147
10592
450
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
19517147E
10592
450
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
19523106
12412
394
14925
HOOKS
RD
UNINC
%REAL ESTATE/FINANCE DEPT
19517145
7636
613
15130
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
ALEX P
SAUNDRA
LECLAIR
19517137
7455
271
15308
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
JENNIFER BROWER
19516202
5849
531
15106
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
SCOTTT
LUANN M JENKINS
19517106
24955
690
15341
BEXLEY
PL
MINT HILL
NICOLE
NATHAN
HUGHES
19507103
6000 JOLI CHEVAL
LN
MINT HILL
%KEITH PARIS,MGR
19507103
6000 JOLI CHEVAL
LN
MINT HILL
%KEITH PARIS,MGR
19507103
25497
724
2200
BAIN FARM
RD
MINT HILL
%KEITH PARIS,MGR
19510137
13710
684
14618
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
CLYDE DANIEL
19516207
7266
977
15010
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
CAROLE A
19517150
2996
144
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
ROBERT
19517136
8006
291
15316
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
RONALD L
19516228
19199
594
14809
BRIDGEWATER
LN
MINT HILL
KEVIN S
JAQUELINE DRAY
DE FREITAS
19508154
26978
870
13415
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
19516227
17371
335
14805
BRIDGEWATER
LN
MINT HILL
MARK S
SUSAN M
PERRY
19508131
19418
1
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
19517103
5552
493
15317
BEXLEY
PL
MINT HILL
ANTHONY P
CAROLL
SCHIRALDI
19508158
26978
870
13521
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
19508155
26978
870
13425
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
19516225
7525
775
14800
BRIDGEWATER
LN
MINT HILL
DEBORAH S
19517107
26409
321
15349
BEXLEY
PL
MINT HILL
ROBIN C
19508156
26978
870
13501
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
19508162
26978
870
4216
CRUMP HILL
CT
MINT HILL
19508151
26978
870
4311
PHILIPS SPRING
CT
MINT HILL
19517132
24274
101
15346
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
DEAN G
KELLIE P
HAWKINS
19506127
6321
345
14709
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
RONALD F
19517143
23168
560
15148
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
WILLIAM M
ROBIN C
CARROLL
19517105
26742
861
15335
BEXLEY
PL
MINT HILL
RONALD
STEPHANIE
WALKER
19524101
12412
394
THOMPSON
RD
UNINC
%REAL ESTATE/FINANCE DEPT
19516201
18649
969
15112
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
MICHAEL
19508159
25676
766
13531
CASTLEFORD
DR
MINT HILL
BILLY 1
LORI A
BENSON
19517156
14623
110
THOMPSON
RD
MINT HILL
% REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPT
19508161
26978
870
4211
CRUMP HILL
CT
MINT HILL
19517144
23069
139
15138
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
RONDAS
19517139
8131
67
15216
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
DAVID L
TERESA A
COLE
19517142
17117
944
15158
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
ROSA E
MERCEDES H
MONTALVO
19517130
8290
618
15345
YARMOUTH
RD
MINT HILL
DOUGLAS WAYNE
SUE L
ARMSTRONG

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
19524101 119524101
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
187.17 AC
Fire District
MINT HILL RURAL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE F
Account Type
EXEMPT
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL - RURAL
ACREAGE
09/01/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
C/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE
DEPT
600E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
12412-394
07/03/2001
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Mint Hill
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
57.13
Zoning Post Construction District
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Jurisdiction Mint Hill
Water Quality Buffer District Goose Creek
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Districts
FEMA and Community Floodplain I Stream Watershed Name I GOOSE
FEMA Panel# 3710550100K
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone IN:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO VERIFY
Community Flood IN:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN TO
Zone VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�THOMPSON RD UNINC
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Allowed Built -Upon Area 1 0.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
19514101 119514101
09/01/2017
Ownership
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
48.71 AC
Fire District
MINT HILL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE F
Account Type
EXEMPT
Municipality
MINT HILL
Property Use
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
09/01/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
600 EAST FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28201
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District I No
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area I No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer
Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date Sale Price
30459-495
12/07/2015
17932-920
03/16/2005 $0.00
01263-539
01/01/1975 $0.00
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District I No
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area I No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer
Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Flood Zone
IN:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
IN:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�THOMPSON RD MINT HILL
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Allowed Built -Upon Area 0.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
19517148 119517148
09/01/2017
Ownership
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
2.402 AC
Fire District
MINT HILL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE F
Account Type
EXEMPT
Municipality
MINT HILL
Property Use
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
09/01/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
600 E 4TH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District I No
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area I No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer
Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
24891-862
07/01/2009
$0.00
09541-784
03/06/1998
$0.00
09041-815
05/01/1997
$0.00
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District I No
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area I No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer
Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Flood Zone
IN:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
IN:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
�THOMPSON RD MINT HILL
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Allowed Built -Upon Area 0.00 sq ft
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

z
5 Fil
gas
362
Temp Cont Easement
i
Storm Wtr Easement
No Easement

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2015 JAN : 01:35:61 PM
BK:30557 PG:113-116
FEE:$25.00
INSTRUMENT # 2015008654
PHETSL
111 '11111111111111111111111111
2016 ' 1654
TAX CODE #
ADDRESS: 926 Camborne P1
Charlotte, NC 28210
19517150
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT X40 q X h&
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 19 day of -V ouar 201, by and between
ROBERT A. WINFREY (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 02996 at Page 144 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, located along Thompson Road in Mint Hill, and represented in the attached
exhibit, ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Forty (40) feet as measured from the top of
bank of the existing storm drainage facilities, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement Area") for
the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28208

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildhigs including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

/R —
Name Date -Z AL)
Name
Name
Name
Date (SEAL)
Date
Date
SEAL)
(SEAL)
North Carolina, County of �mti
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North Carolina, County of AeC-k /e w /0u r
�Lc ; n ; f y"l- 0 s s , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify tha Dayl A Wycct%e , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, v �er lL& LJi n -Pr e y
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
�. j c._s\V.c._rL' 20 j 6. -
OTARY PUBLIC)
41'N--
My commission expires � c� � , ;� f `o
SEAL-STAMPLSTATEE�
:.,_.; iu� us
LCtdd�iRG COUNTY
OF NORTH CAROLINA

TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 01 11:19:J2 AM
BK:31135 PG:218-220
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016117004
TAYLORD
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV�IIA'nIIIwINlll
2016117004
195-081-61
4211 Crump Hill Court
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day oJA T2016, by and between Michael R. Kroll
and Angela B. Kroll husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 30678 at Page 488 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Stone Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Stone Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said stonn drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of stone waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is farther understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate namby its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this day of , , 2016.
r
2! 5 - X
7 (SEAL)
Michael R. Kroll
(SEAL)
Angela B JKroll
North Carolina, County of 9t Zd._
I, _ '2zecll/l a notary public o o��,ty do hereby certify Michael R. Kroll
and Angela B. Kroll, husband and wife, GRANTOR, persona 1y appeared before me this day and
acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my handofficialtam�r'" seal, this
ay of f 2016. ?
VOTARY
My commission expires`
SEAL -STAMP
•`'�S�Nk BLOC
®I A RZZ
y
MY COMM. ExP`ms
g-26-2020
'. ��
P I B ��G �
�///10111110
iZON co\ ��\ X�
3

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 01 11:19:J2 AM
BK:31135 PG:215-217
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016117003
TAYLORD
11111111111111111111111111
2016117003
TAX CODE # 195-081-56
ADDRESS: 13501 Castleford Dr.
Mint Hill, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 10th day of August, 2016, by and between Theodore Maloney.
unmarried (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 30838 at Page 666 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Stoma Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perforin necessary maintenance ;and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storiir waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto s iis'hand and seal, or ifcorporate, has caused this
instrument signed in its corporate nam -d y authored officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authorityo s B and of Directors, this ay of 2016.
(SEAL)
Theodore
North Carolina, CCA 61 ej
I,'gSc` an tao rypublicofsaidcountydoherebycertifythatTheodore
Malonev, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this a day of U� t✓� ,
2016.
Egtltt@ttt@@@@a{J
©_ t�r� (NOTARY PUBLIC)
colmnissionexpires _Q? Zo
3

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 AUG 04 09:53:65 AM
BK:31050 PG:697-699
INSTRUMENT$#620106101801
TAYLORD
2016101801
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
195-081-57
13511 Castleford Drive
Mint Hill, NC 28227
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of, 2016, by and between Jason C. Knotts
and Andrea E. Knotts husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 29473 at Page 495 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or unproved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate namejVy its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Bo rd of it rs, 7ism day of , 2016.
(SEAL)
Jason C. Knotts
(SEAL)
Andrea LEKnotts
North Carolina, County, of C
I, �r, a notary public ofd county do hereby certify that Jason C.
Knotts and Andrea E. Knotts husband and wife, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and
acknoy�ledged the e/xe� tion of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official p or seal, this
Thr day of / ��/ (/,T 2016.
/ /e'/ "4��l
r� (NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
lllilfl/
SEAL -STAMP
My Comm. Expires
= 9-26-2020
-G 8L`G
ti
*®//1COUN�y �\�.
i

FOR REGISTRATION
J, David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JUL 28 12:32:62 PM
BK:31028 PG:708-711
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016097789
PHETSL
201
TAX CODE # 19510101
ADDRESS: 14604 ThompsonRd
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT _
& U� I
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this ' day of b 204e, by and between
MEETA J. TURNER (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, apolitical
subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 10105 at Page 273 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of one hundred (100) feet as measured from
the top of bank of the existing storm drainage facilities, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in
title, with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water
Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28208

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as maybe essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for suchpurposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name l 4ao Date
Name
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of /%d 1 ev1bU(
Date
Date
Date
,2 - (SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
L To, vi LY NoidSLi9he- , a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
Me ef4 J Tumel as;,=,`�'svJ , GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this _� day of kbrua f y 520162
V -
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires T, l y 2F,, 2 o z o
SEAL -STAMP DAVID MONDSHANE
Notary Public
Mecklenburg Co., North Carolina
My Commission Expires July 28, 2020
North Carolina, County of
I,
certify that
a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
, personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence,
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
120
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP

0"
� j
00
v
\--/•
,X�
cn z
Jp
W U)
a..
LL 0
< F=-
0
0
N
I I
t
U
C
T
C
0
E
W
L
as
E
I-
0 O
O
a�
C
o
O
0
N
N w
� N
O _
m
�
�
a
c
a
Q
is
am
ti
o
vCl)
N
w
ZQQ
m
0-
N
z CL
(7
E
0
--
C7
0"
� j
00
v
\--/•
,X�
cn z
Jp
W U)
a..
LL 0
< F=-
0
0
N
I I
t
U
C
T
C
0
E
W
L
as
E
I-
0 O
O

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JUL 28 12:32:52 PM
BK:31028 PG:712-715
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016097790
PHETSL
III I III 111111111111111112016097790l
TAX CODE # 19510136,
19570137
ADDRESS: 14642 ThompsonRd
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
U,7 --
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of A - , 2041', by and between
CLYDE DANIEL TURNER (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 05218 at Page 004
(Parcel 19510136) and Deed Book 13710 at Page 684 (Parcel 19510137) in the Mecklenburg Public Registry,
and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of one hundred (100) feet as measured from
the top of bank of the existing storm drainage facilities, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in
title, with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water
Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28208

F
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing put -poses; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and put -poses and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow ofwater, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of 320
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name Date�20]b(SEAL)
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
I,
Date
Date
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
Date °" l�e SEAL
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North Carolina, County of�-
win/ �j .� �/1 u,�. , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that Pd U4 personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in hist presence, :P ,+ V ct- A, GV® u c,; e
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this a,6 P) day of
20Z.
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires / -�2 6 R �
~�.,,`fg
�tlili �

TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
..............
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
BK:30557 PG 92 94 PM
INSTRUMENT$#62016008647
PHETSL
201600Y:6f47lll�l��f�ll���
19516225
14800 Bridgewater Ln
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of (. nn
2015, by and between Deborah S
Williams, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 07525 at Page 775 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructin , o$erating and maintaining storm drainage
facilitie/ {tif f I o s -e -s o C S�'�� G G'° �✓� ?� �' � Coln I-� Cz�►C � r�a.►d
Ido�V� G?W,�fnGr �S �]i`f'Lt %Cr7 D�6✓l q
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its enti#ety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
�S�- I

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation,trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and agreed upon with property owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise qf the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall.be repaired
by the GIZRYYA,N• TcFarGw� )/I,6K, P )aoll
,�
N141 P/J
wt-It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream , . bf a1
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name Date
Name
Name
Name
Date
Date
Date
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
North Carolina, County of
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20_
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North Carolina, County of L j r_,.,f �,f
I, , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that llnjUv aoje, S L,,( -S , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, N k -u 11 s- wmfr k. S
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 1 ✓0'l day of
Dc, -66c r , 2015. ,/ /
(N�(�� ° - PVQLIC)
My commission expires. Z�% �'
t40 T',q�
SEAL -STAMP m �'
�S.L
vi
v0aaas Goe000�®�p9®
3

..............................................
.........................
.............................
FOR REGISTRATION
J- David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 AUG 04 09:53:65 AM
SK:31050 PG:693-696
FEEINSTRUMENT#6'00
2016101800
TAYLORD
I
I
2016101800
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORMTER E.E EDIT
195-162-26
14801 Bridgewater Lane
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this - day of �A 2016, by and between NC RE
Investments LLC a North Caroiina limited liabili company (hereina er referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKL,EN 3URG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 30048 at Page 917 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said G1.U%NTOR, in consideration cfthe mub.:al covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 330 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek (`Basement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area cu,,/erect by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easemenl is giVen CU permit the construction, reconst:ucticn, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its dul authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thisZ1 day of , 2016 .
Traci D. Dalton, Manager
(SEAL)
State of County Of
I, , a notary public of County and state
aforesaid, certify that Traci D. Dalton, Manager of NC RE Investments, LLC, a North Carolina
limited liability company, personally appeared before me this day and being duly sworn stated that in
his/her presence, signed the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of ,
2016.
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
3

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of San Diego
On.IQ before mer 8 . /21. , `'i ts'' �'�1�:r` r :. '/ s° I.r`t ° t ,�, t, f�..,
Date Insert Name and Title of Officer Abov
personally appeared
Name of Signe;,W
1.
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personWwhose named is/*
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that /she/the'v executed the same in
,hi/her/tb& r authorized capacity,, and that byXs/her/ lr signature(ebn the instrument the person';`
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(`dcted, executed the instrument.
J11111111117:111 illi 1111w! 1111 Ili Intl 111[4111[1 Ili i :mitnill 11IIIEIIIIIl II lulu 111111711!'
iMO C i-lY E. EME%i—K=
F '
1 00l1,,1MHSSi0N# 2119598 r
NOTARY PUBLIC
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a
Commission Expires: Jul(16th 2019
auluuuuululnlomenuunwlnnuunnvuu llauullnn nnnnwlnnlunnl'r.
Place Notary Seal Above
Signature
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph
is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or
fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document v...W
Title or Type of Document: ,°"` /zL
Document Date:
Number of Pages: �� Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:'
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
❑ Corporate Officer e(s):
❑ Partner — CImlted ❑ General
❑ InclMoue ❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ stee ❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Signer's Name:
❑ Corporate Officer — Title(
[]Partner— ❑Limited-''❑ General
❑ Individual - Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee w ❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Others "`_
Is Representing:

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:61 PM
BK:30557 PG:95-97
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008648
PHETSL
201
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
19516227
14805 Bridgewater Ln
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this�J day of 2015, by and between Mark S &
—r—
Susan M Perry, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 17371 at Page 335 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR; in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities,wL,v.� ,�-u jy1
r�i1�9a' cS �
1LA
This Storm Water Easement rep ces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation,trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and agreed upon with property owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
b GRANTEE.
y the ,3�ry�kr� �S�a a3'ect
�i � � �w� � tc Y�e�. � 1 Mal
.� p-G�3 �``�� 6/ddeRS � Oi'7 9 eIt is further und2rstood that the GRANTOR shad no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]

Name
Name
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
Date
Date
i
/0// Y124>
AL)
Ifl2US-_
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
EAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20_
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North Carolina, County of
a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certi that k Nc wt� eS 4 5 , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, A4AZ14 S, i �— jjIJ PCV(,
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
mow' , 201.5.
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires G �1 Zq 4I 7 ®®eeaeae °p®O°
ONE
SEAL -STAMP
QRUC
3
enaog®e4mm®

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 30 11:02:2 AM
BK:31214 PG:233-236
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016132104
TAYLORD
1111 1111111111111
I
20161
TAX CODE #: 195-162-08
ADDRESS: 15004 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 28th day of September, 2016, by and between Tana G. Dean
and husband, Jason C. Dean (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed 12272 at Page 728 in the
Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 15 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek (`Basement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208 6 �/

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thisiday of , 2016.
"-,. r - - -, (SEAL)
Tarra G. Dean
North Carolina, County of t �/t �i�(��
I, _MMa notary public o county do hereby certify that Tarra G.
Dean, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 67-
day of - 2016.
OTARY UBLIC)
My commission expires � r, -''��
SEAL -STAMP
apTAR y
= My Cantu. Expires
4.26-2020
G
PUBL\ V \
"/ii/H GOON 0���

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thi§ffday of �c C , 2016.
' (SEAL)
Jasog C. Dean
North Carolina, County of
I, J fa Az! a notary public of said county do hereby certify that Jason C.
Dean, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this Z9 day of Z , 2016.
OTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires3 6
� ,
SEAL -STAMP
It- SON
I I B Z O //�
N0 TA,,y
MY Car". Expires
9-16-2020
,G A1d-8L1�
2
C!

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 30 11:02:J2 AM
BK:31214 PG:229-232
FEE : $26 .00
INSTRUMENT # 2016132103
TAYLORD
III 1�111 III I III 111111111111
2016132103
TAX CODE #: 195-162-06
ADDRESS: 15016 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 28th day of September, 2016, by and Josephine Alberico,
unmarried and Steven M. Adams unmarried (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 19279 at Page 690 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 20 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek (`Basement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Easement area will be accessed from the stream -side of the parcel. No access to the easement area
is granted from the front (house) side of the property.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
0

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thisday of �, 2016.
(SEAL)
t
o ephi Alberico
North Carolina, County of k1 (i ,,1, ,v, 4 r
1, �6 L7r a notary public of ounty do hereby certify Josephine
Alberico, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 2X day of
2016. -
J
24ZI
?,/
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
3
.`\�\\`'ON ISLCC��i
�OTARy_
My Comm. Expires
9.26-2020
p B 00
ZO C00N0y

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thisOyday of5f, 2016.
(SEAL)
Steven M. Adams
North Carolina, County of A14, 'r 7 '
I, / � ✓ t '/�0 a notary public of --;i county do hereby certify Steven M.
Adams, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of -° 16.
ARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
I
SO�N► 8Z 0zzii
N O TA,,y
y
MY COMM,
x gyres
G 'OUSLIG
� cOUNl� r�V
0►►i►i0

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 01 11:19:2 AM
BK:31135 PG:221-224
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016117005
TAYLORD
III I 11111111111111111111
2016117005
TAX CODE #
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
195-162-05
15022 Yarmouth Road
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 24th day of August, 2016, by and between Aaron K. Forsyth
and wife, Ashley E. Fors tthh (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 29839 at Page 660 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 15 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the stoml drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Wooden shed.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thisA day of .s2Q _, 2016.
r. (SEAL)
Aaron K. Forsyth
North Carolina, County of
I, 2z a notary public o ,cou ty do hereby certify that Aaron K.
Fors h, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and ac % wledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this lay of 2016.
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires q
Z� �7 Zap
SEAL -STAMP 111
SON 8Z
OTAr? y%
1
W COfItr11. Expims
9'26-2020
G G pU8 LIG
2
3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its dul authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this�'2day of � _'2016.
A" � Lr73---t-r 17, (SEAL)
Ashley E. Fo yth
North Caro
L— J/7>wl/ '6 C/L& a notary publicoo ty do hereby certify that Aaron K.
Ashley E. Forsyth, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me t is ay and ack7pledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of &1 E
2016.
TAR(PUBLIC)
My commission expires
i
SEAL -STAMP
\�0Illtlll/���
.��\\SO N B (OC
�OTAR yy
My Comm. Woes
9.26-2020
PUBL\C'
�// iRN 00016 \\\

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2015 JAN 26 01:35: 1 PM
BK:30557 PG:98-100
FEE -$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008549
PHETSL
111 11111111111111
201
TAX CODE #: 19516204
ADDRESS: 15030 Yarmouth Rd
Mint Hill, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this i& day of 2015, by and between Michelle Marie
McFall, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, apolitical subdivision
of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 23235 at Page 890 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed-upon vegetation, trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and agreed upon with property'owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly a thorized officers and its sear -be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this,21 day of �% � , 20 1
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name
Name
Name
Date
Date
ra/z; / r�'<
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
Date (SEAL)
Name Date (SEAL)
North Carolina County of ol_ v o.
I, L* , a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
K G l,L , GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of (,; ! 20
lv ��
My commission expire,�,�uuuurr l (NOTARY PUBLIC)
SEAL -STAMP oP ti
Notary Public
union County
My commission Expires_
10/30/2016 _-
4
.10
North Carolina, CounI�4n111ne
I, , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence,
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
20
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
3
(NOTARY PUBLIC)

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
2016
ecklen Mecklenburg County NC
BK:30557 PG189 91 PM
INSTRUMENT$#620106008646
PHETSL
2016008646
TAX CODE #: 19516203
ADDRESS: 15100 Yarmouth Rd
Mint Hill, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of , 2015, by and between William E &
Rose Ann Genet, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 10576 at Page 026 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
ZD
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation, trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and agreed upon with property owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes ofthis Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereuntnet his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]

1
Name- %' Date 1(11Zms`s (SEAL)
t
Name Date
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
Date (SEAL)
Date (SEAL)
public of said county do hereby certify that
GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of 20.
N PCU `�-
` (NOT Y PUBLIC)
sfoo --expires 1 '
0 . v
_= o
N ►�
��i�C M• EXP• � G� ���
r,�� ,,FN 81
and state aforesaid,
certify that p 11, n, ��•k�
��<_, personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence,
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, thi '5C- day of
(NOT Y PUBL
My commission expire .Kk -m
NE N P�G��'i
SEAL -STAMP `:�Q=,PU
z_
3
to
zxp "S
11®x/INOO

TAX CODE #
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 OCT 18 11:03:J2 AM
BK:31262 PG:362-365
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016140943
TAYLORD
III I 11111111111111111111
2016140943
195-162-02
15106 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this Y day of 0 GT o 13f_yZ, '2016, by and between
Scott T. Baker and wife LuAnn M. Jenkins Baker (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 5849 at Page 531 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave V
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area.. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate na by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
x
authority of its Board of Directors, this day of 1 2016.
(SEAL)
Scott T. Baker
State of eTY CiW 11 , County of Ayctl&y 6
I,a' ` a notary public of VX1County do hereby
certifv that Scott T. Baker, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and ackno�,wle ged the
execution,of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
€ 2016.
r
OTARI� PUBLIC)
My commission expires � , f
SEAL -STAMP �",\\`jp N i B
P
� �pTAR p.
My Corms. Expires
9.26-2020
ZZ
pQ.13 00
V�
3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this day of _ , 2016.
y,.� (SEAL)
n M. Je er
North Carolina, County of C , A1e'
I, _11 , 9 z &-H a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
Jenkins Baker, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this �7 day of
2016.
(NOTARY
My commission expires
.d
SEAL -STAMP
N0TA,,y
My 9.2&2020 ��
G pi'BL10
zp;// C0UNZ'A k�\\
11

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
21AYN
UG 04 09 53 65 A
016 M
BK:31050 PG:690-692
INSTRUMENT$#620106101799
TAYLORD
I II I
I
201 I
6101799
TAX CODE #: 195-162-01
ADDRESS: 15112 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 27th day of July, 2016, by and between Michael P. Golik,
unmarried, (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 18649 at Page 959 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation, trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed
modifications within the easement will be discussed and agreed upon with property owner(s)
prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate nam y its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
author'ty f .ts Bo rd of -Directors, this4ay of % , 2016.
(SEAL)
Mi hael P. G61ik
North Carolina, County of &t(ZZ
I, _.1 ,- Z ()r , a notary public o r° ounty do hereby certify that Michael P.
Golik, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and a kn, ledged the execution of the foregoing
77
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this r day of 2016.
OTARY UBLIC)
My commission expires 12 42 ,4/
SEAL-STAMP
\\\\\PSOmNI i B ""c
TARyy'�
MY Comm. Expires -
9-26-2020
�O �! 8 0
��%���C�0U14 ��\�

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:61 PM
BK:30557 PG:86-88
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008645
PHETSL
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
19517146
15122 Yarmouth Rd
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this (1 day of h , 2015, by and between Margaret
Rhyne Bigham & Lynda Bigham Evans, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 27507 at Page 032 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation, trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and agreedupon with property owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _q day of U cA— , 20 1 S
[Signatures on following page]
P

Name(w, Gamer—� Date
,(SEAL)
Name, Dated l ✓_�` (SEAL)
Name Date (SEAL)
Name
Nort Carolina, County of
I,
Date (SEAL)
a notary pu c of said county do hereby certify that
10 ,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this cy and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20 �.
• . Y PUB
O�
N�q fn"'
osSon expires
®m®
AL-STAP
a
North Carolina, County of
I, , a notary publicofsaid county and state aforesaid;
certify that , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence,
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of
20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP

roR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
MecklenburgER OF DEEPS
2016 JAN 26 County NC
BK:30552 p01-35•61 PM
FEE• 101'103
INSTRUMENT$#62006008650
PHETSL
20160081;c 0
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
19517145
15130 Yarmouth Rd
Mint Hill, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of SL117, 2015, by and between Alex P &
Saundra Leclair, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR", and MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by
context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 07636 at Page 613 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Agreed upon vegetation, trees, fence and/or other structures within the easement. Proposed modifications
within the easement will be discussed and "agreed 'upon with property owner(s) prior to activity.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this day of 120
[Signatures on following page]
2 eff
'4

Name �� ✓ `'�� Date 2 9. (SEAL)
Name c e. ' Date / (SEAL)
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
I,
Date
Date
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of 520
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
u'
North Carolina, County of
a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that'- , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, 4 5�uwiv& a i V- .
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official sta r seal, this day of
91;2iI/_j ,20�
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
•°pev av o vv � v®nor
My commission expires _ J/ 2 q LZ01-7r••o°��®NE,6R•o,
SEAL -STAMP M07_,1 �O
s z ,c, R¢ '�
L
Ic
3 �y'•c®LINTY �;.•'.
��

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEE®S
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 AUG 05 02:21:63 PM
BK:31056 PG:313-314
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016102775
BAKERFR
IIIIIIrIII'VIIIIIIn'IIIiIIPII ll'
02775
Drawn by and return to : Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28208
TAX CODE 19517144
ADDRESS: 15138 Yarmouth Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that RONDA S AVILA hereinafter called "GRANTOR" (whether
one or more), for valuable consideration, does hereby declare that I (we) am (are) the owner(s) of the herein
referenced property and do hereby grant unto the COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG, a political subdivision of the
state of North Carolina, its successors and assigns, hereinafter called "GRANTEE", the right, privilege and easement
to go in and upon a portion of that land conveyed to GRANTOR (hereinafter "premises") by instrument recorded
in Deed Book 23069 at Page 139, in the Mecklenburg Public Registry; and commonly known as 15 13 8 Yarmouth
Road, Charlotte, NC;
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to said
GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of up to TEN(10) feet beyond the existing creek top of
bank commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing,
operating and maintaining storm drainage facilities. The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter
said easement area to inspect and survey said storm drainage facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and
repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing
purposes; to remove from the easement, now or at any time in the future, obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Any existing property fence, structures, or special vegetation (as denoted by GRANTOR);
Any trees selected by GRANTOR and marked for preservation (Grantor will itemize on plat with Grantee's
project manager and will also flag along project easement corridor);
The existing sewer/power line(s) and public utility right of way.
Initial
RBCwB:190167.DOCX\4-20-2016

It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Grantee shall have the right of ingress, egress,
and regress over and upon any lands of the Grantor adjacent to or in the vicinity of the premises as may be essential
to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall be deemed a trespass. Any damage
which may occur outside the easement to fences, buildings, or other structures resulting from the Grantee's exercise
of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired by the Grantee.
It is further understood that the Grantor shall erect no permanent structure of any kind over or across this easement.
For purposes of this easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to: buildings including sheds, walls,
and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The Grantor shall not attempt to block or
otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water, or remove the function of the channel as a
restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing, or destructing any vegetation within the
easement). In addition, the required federal, state and local permits shall be obtained prior to proceeding with any
project within this easement.
This easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The Grantee has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but has no
liability for any failure to do so. Grantee may relocate the facilities and easement over the premises to conform to
any future highway or street relocation widening or improvement.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the premises will be free
of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by Grantee is warranted to keep the premises free of water.
THIS " day of 2016.
` _ T
Rond S. Avila
WI S
Mark eboiVe
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
I certify that Mark Boone personally appeared before me this day and certified to me under
oath or by affirmation that he is not a grantee or beneficiary of the transaction, that Mark Boone recognizes the
signature of RONDA S. AVILA and that the signature is genuine.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of J U- r� , 2016.
a /S al
VIRGINIA F. MULLIS
NOTARY PUBLIC
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
.. , .-
RBC WB:190167.DOCM4-20-2016
Nota�ry Public V
y (Type Name)
My Commission Expire s:`i

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 SEP 01 11:19:22 AM
BK:31135 PG:225-228
INSTRUMENT$#620116117006
TAYLORD
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
2016117006
TAX CODE 4:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
195-171-43
15148 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of 2016, by and between William M.
Carroll and wife Robin C. Carroll (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 23168 at Page 560 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate na e by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this day of L✓�i (/� , 2016.
(SEAL)
William M. Carroll
North Carolina County of ✓"(Od � �
,1C a notary public of ui do hereby certify that William M.
Carroll, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and achwledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this d 2016.
OTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires -A'`�
SEAL -STAMP
�OTAR yy
= My cortin. E*IMS =
9.26.20 —
PQBL\G cj

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this2 day of ��' ��� 52016.
A A I
hvu om
(SEAL)
Robin C. Carroll
North Carolina, County of
I, Li/mL (� , a notary public ?f ' my do hereby certify that Robin C.
Carroll, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and wledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of (� (�`i/ 2016.
OTAR PUBLIC)
My commission expires LZ 112 `f
SEAL -STAMP

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburgg County NC
2016 SEP 20 11:48:5 AM
BK:3FEE?1184-317
$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016125847
STITTKS
1111111111111111
2016125847
TAX CODE #:
ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
195-171-42
15158 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this d`--'�--- ay of 2016, by and between Rosa E.
Mascorro and Mercedes H. Montalvo n/k/a Mercedes H. Ortega (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 17117 at Page 944 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 30 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave
Charlotte, NC 28208

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name'by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thi � day of ��, 2016.
(SEAL)
Rosa E. Mascorro
North Carolina, County of X8"I
I, „f' z , a notary public oI my do hereby certify that Rosa E.
Mascorro, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ' d"f , , V
2016.
My commission expires 6
J
SEAL -STAMP
OTARY

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name4by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thiZ7day of ,r� ��; , 2016.
(SEAL)
Mercedes H. Montalvo rjR� y'
North Carolina, County of
1, .) , ' 61
a notary public o 6Ytfi ty do hereby certify that Mercedes H.
Montalvo, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ay of
2016.
My commission expires Ll -dr, G2
SEAL -STAMP
,B IL 0 C
O-�PARY
� �p gyres
G
6N�oN COv��J\\�
���Illli111�
11
OTARY PUBLIC)

............:...............................
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberr
REGISTER OF DEE6S
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:61 PM
BK:3FEE7$26:00 -109
INSTRUMENT # 2016008652
PHETSL
201
TAX CODE # t 17 i q
ADDRESS: 15�LO ®
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this aq day of J=r,+(C—, 2015, by and between
S' 77— -P m le- S' , J r, - ky b w W &S& hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 1 8 (O at Page
_(�,42- in the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above
("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Thirty (3 0) feet as measured from the top
of bank of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek
("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm
drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow ofwater, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name Date ��r (SEAL)
61
i
Name Date �; (SEAL)
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
Date (SEAL)
Date (SEAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North Carolina, County of 727eck/e,74Lcr,
I, N Irc\ i ry ] Z 0 S , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify t tah (�� V� L Joo j A , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, 7P_*"e S . Av b; a , ./ lis
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 9( day of
20 1 �.
ARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires a(s
SEAL -STAMP
VIRGINIA • MU"S
NOTARY PU61-IC
MECKLENBURG CAR 41NA
N
STATE OF NpFITH CARG

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:1 PM
EK:30557 PG:120-122
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008656
PHETSL
�VI��sVl�l��'VhVYM�lII'��
TAX CODE
ADDRESS: u
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this - day of d��'_ , 2015, by and between
y„. ,4 � ,^ ' -6 e wzs kt� ; Q-- (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MEEKLY NBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 992%7 at Page
$ gni in the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above
("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Thirty (3 0) feet as measured from the top
of bank of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek
(`Basement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm
drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
Z11GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
M

p
r
Name ' a Date(SEAL)
Namej4 Date L�_ ? S _(SEAL)
L
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
I,
Date
Date
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North,,Carolina, County of 7%C Gly )f v9 bu.r
a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that batL.*i� L &oA%e= , personally appeared before me thisday and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, T-&_.rr-,y , ��, err,' YPksSel E,A//e_
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this off- (,� day of
20 �4a.
_ (�- -,
My commission expires �
�S O j � OTARY PUBLIC)
SEAL -STAMP VIRGINIA R. MULLIS
NOTARY PUBLIC
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
3

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:61 PM
BK:30557 PG:110-112
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008653
PHETSL
TAX CODE # j I �I - -
ADDRESS: 1 s--iee jgr,�7c -f� Pd..
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this ')I day of 3 -.kite- , 2015, by and between
6V �,� ��� �� % (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book $1 31 at Page
(n% in the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above
("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Thirty (3 0) feet as measured from the top
of bank of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek
("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm
drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area. .
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this — day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name Date -3L of (SEAL)
15 A<11�
Name,�� G �►-��� Date (SEAL)
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
I,
Date
(SEAL)
Date (SEAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North„Carolina, County of �%eC-Qe,7 bur
I, - i �4;1�- a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify tha 5av; a Uood r<2 , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, Da �
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this 9-� day of
20
LIC)
My commission expires �-S d f kc (NOTARY PUB
SEAL-STAMP
VIRGINIA R. MULLIS
NOTARY PUBLIC
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JAN 26 01:35:61 PM
BK:30557 PG:117-119
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016008655
PHETSL
IIIN!V�I11111111111111111
i
TAX CODE # ) 9,5 17/ / 3'
ADDRESS: 15,300a rooa QL4
MIkV'T*LL,eG z�622-
7
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this �� day of Jv 4 e--, 2015, by and between
de, 2Te (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG Cl TY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book ,3 c? at Page
329 in the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above
("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Thirty (3 0) feet as measured from the top
of bank of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek
("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm
drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood. and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of 120
[Signatures on following page]
PA

Name Date /� (SEAL)
Name �� l Date ( __2 (I - 2`4 S SEAL
Name
Name
North Carolina, County of
Date (SEAL)
Date (SEAL)
a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
,GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this day of , 20
(NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires
SEAL -STAMP
North,Carolina, County of 797ec-0e,7hur
I, 'y ® f �) ` c, i c _!� \ � d s , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that L '000 e_ , personally appeared before me this day and
being duly sworn stated that in his/her presence, be e✓9.0 e.{�/�4 e.14 %vv re e
signed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this J- � day of
20
OTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires ��� � S c� o f
SEAL -STAMP VIRGINIA R. MULLIS
NOTARY PUBLIC
MECKLENBUP,G COUNTY
STATE OF NORTH CRRO:.INA
3

FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 AUG 04 09:53:45 AM
BK:31050 PG:687-689
FEE:$26.00
INSTRUMENT # 2016101798
TAYLORD
1111' 11111111111111111111111111111
6101798
TAX CODE #: 195-171-36
ADDRESS: 15316 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made thisG7 day of ...�2016, by and between Ronald L.
Putnam and wife, Barbara B. Putnam (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called "GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner of that land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 8006 at Page 291 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, and commonly known by the address shown above ("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of 3 0 feet as measured from the top of bank
of the storm drainage facilities as installed or improved, and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement
Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage
facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, thi day of Jyz , 2016.
(SEAL)
Ronald L. Putnam and wife, Barbara B. Putnam
North Carolina, County of
I, % r1l a notary public o �Zounty do hereby certify that Ronald L.
Putnam and Barbara B. Putnam, GRANTOR, personally appeared before me this day and acknowle ed the
execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ay of
.%z 2016..,-�
Y PUBLIC)
My commission expires.%
SEAL-STAMP\\\\®N1 �j ®C �
B L
�P pTkRV
— MY �omm2020;�s
Cj
/o/II I I I I \ 1 � \

............................
.....................................................
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
MecklenburgEROF CounDyEDNC
2016 SEP 30 11:02:2 AM
BK:31214 PG:225-228
INSTRUMENT$#620106132102
TAYLORD
2016132102
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
Street Address: 15324 Yarmouth Road
Charlotte, NC 28227
Tax Parcel #: 195-171-35
THIS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ("Agreement") is made and
entered into as of the 28th day of September, 2016, by and between Michael A. Mitchell and wife,
McRhan Gaffney n/k/a Meghan Gaffney Mitchell (herein "Grantors") and MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina ("County") and
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County is planning on doing storm water improvements on Stevens Creek
(the" Creek") in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantors own the property ("Property") located at the address listed above in
Mecklenburg County; and
WHEREAS, the Property abuts a parcel on which the County, or a contractor hired by the
County, is planning on doing storm water improvements; and
WHEREAS, Grantors have agreed to grant a Temporary Construction Easement ("TCE")
to County for the purpose of assisting in this storm water project;
2e�kv►.rh '1 v : c,(� (:� r� b u,►-� Ca S)�-OYw+ W,o.JYt �v ,, u-5
189445 1
I rl o V1L 2 -MOV

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements
of the parties, IT IS AGREED:
1. Grant of TCE: Grantors hereby give, grant and convey to County and its
contractors the temporary right, privilege and easement to go over, across, through and upon that
portion of Property having a width of 20 feet as measured from the existing top of bank of the storm
drainage facilities and commonly known as Stevens Creek ("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying,
constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm drainage facilities.
2. Duration of TCE: The TCE granted herein shall terminate upon the earlier to
occur of. (a) the completion of the improvements, and (b) three 3 years from the date of this
Agreement. It is hereby agreed that Grantors waive claim of trespass on said Property and the
County's or its contractors' presence within the Temporary Construction Easement Area shall
not be deemed a trespass during the duration of the TCE.
3. Indemnification: To the extent permitted by law, County will indemnify, protect
and hold harmless Grantors and their successors and assigns, from and against any and all loss,
cost, damage and expense (a) arising from or out of the placement of any mechanic's or
materialmen's liens upon the Property by any parties employed or engaged by County; and (b)
arising from, out of or in connection with any actions taken by County, or its employees, agents
or contractors, in the exercise of its rights hereunder and the performance of the work described
herein, including without limitation, claims by third parties, personal injury, death, or damage to
property, and any violation of applicable environmental law.
4. Restoration: County will comply with all erosion and sedimentation control laws
and all other governmental regulations applicable to the storm water improvements. Upon the
completion of the work, County may spray invasive vegetation and/or plant vegetation on the
stream banks.
5. Covenants Running with the Land: The TCE herein granted and conveyed shall be
a burden upon Property and shall bind Grantors and County and their assigns.
6. Governing Law: This Agreement is to be governed, construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of North Carolina.
189445 2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors and County have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above mentioned.
a
A. Mitchell
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
I, a Notwy Public of -the- County and State aforesaid, certify that
Michael A. Mitchell personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the
foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this day of-��%�(✓, 2016.
[Stamp/Seal) \ \\\\�E 1111 ///////
MY Comm. Expires =
= 0.26-2020 —
�r
G LICi
+ 1!1111\
189445
Not ublic -
(Print name)
My Commission Expires:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors and County have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above mentioned.
GRANTOR:
Meghan Gaffney �� � �i �/� % ;q1w 101 TCYSZZ
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
a Notary Public of lite County and State aforesaid, certify that
apGaf# 7ersonally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing
instrument. °� ° % AIVZ?/JZZ
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this
[Stamp/Sealj N0TgR yam;
My
9-26-2020 Pins _
,G A�BLIG
�'/;/j �0UNZ�
189445
Notary
day of �%�% , 2016.
V (Print Name) r'
My Commission Expires: _

...............
FOR REGISTRATION
J. David Granberry
REGISTER OF DEEDS
Mecklenburg County NC
2016 JUL 28 12:32:42 PM
BK:3102FEE8$26.004-707
INSTRUMENT # 2016097788
PHETSL
III'NIIIi�IM11111111111111111I
�
TAX CODE # 19517155
ADDRESS: 15550 ThompsobRd
Charlotte, NC 28227
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
STORM WATER EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this 11�-A day of rr-doiea! r 2015, by and between
JAMES R WIGGINS JR. AND MITZI C WIGGINS (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR), and
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter called
"GRANTEE".
The designation GRANTOR and GRANTEE, as used herein, shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
GRANTOR is the owner ofthat land described in an instrument recorded in Deed Book 08064 at Page 520 in
the Mecklenburg Public Registry, located at 15550 Thompson Road, and represented in the attached exhibit,
("Premises").
Said GRANTOR, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, terms and conditions, hereby grants and conveys to
said GRANTEE an easement across the Premises having a width of Forty (40) feet as measured from the
existing property line, and represented in the attachment along the stream commonly known as Stevens Creek
("Easement Area") for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating and maintaining storm
drainage facilities.
This Storm Water Easement replaces in its entirety any Right of Way Agreement previously granted to
Mecklenburg County by the Grantor of this Storm Water Easement, or by his/her/ or its predecessor in title,
with respect to the area covered by both the old Right of Way Agreement and this new Storm Water Easement.
Drawn by and return to: Mecklenburg County
Storm Water Services
2145 Suttle Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28208

The following rights are also granted to GRANTEE: to enter said Premises to inspect said storm drainage
facilities, to perform necessary maintenance and repairs, and to make alterations and additions thereto; to
obtain samples of storm waters from time to time for testing purposes; to remove from the Easement Area,
now or at any time in the future, trees, structures, or other obstructions that may endanger the proper
maintenance and operation of said storm drainage facilities, except for the following pre-existing items:
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Easement Area hereinbefore described unto the GRANTEE, its
successors and assigns, for the aforesaid uses and purposes and none other.
It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the GRANTEE shall have the right of
ingress, egress, and regress over and upon any lands of the GRANTOR adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
Premises as may be essential to the use thereof for the aforesaid purposes, and no entry for such purposes shall
be deemed a trespass. Any damage which may occur outside the Easement Area to fences, buildings, or other
structures resulting from the GRANTEE's exercise of the right of ingress, egress, and regress shall be repaired
by the GRANTEE.
It is further understood that the GRANTOR shall erect no permanent structure of any kind within, over or
across this Easement Area. For purposes of this Easement, permanent structure includes, but is not limited to:
buildings including sheds, walls, and other masonry structures, tennis courts, and swimming pools. The
GRANTOR shall not attempt to block or otherwise impede the natural flow of water, pollute the surface water,
or remove the function of the channel as a restored or improved stream (including cutting, removing, mowing,
or destructing any vegetation within the Easement Area.
This Easement is given to permit the construction, reconstruction, operation and maintenance of storm drainage
facilities to be installed. The GRANTEE has the right to maintain the storm drainage facilities it installs, but
has no liability for any failure to do so.
Improvement to existing facilities or installation of new facilities does not guarantee that the Premises will be
free of all flooding and/or erosion. No work performed by GRANTEE is warranted to keep the Premises free
of water.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this
instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereto affixed by
authority of its Board of Directors, this _ day of , 20
[Signatures on following page]
2

Name // Date ', (SEAL)
_ e,–
Name U . ..... .Date(SEAL)
Name
Name
Date
Date
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
No Carolina, County of
I, 2, a notary public of said county do hereby certify that
Y A mIP-S R. 1,111 /x-41 n5 J-19— , GRANTOR,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this _,R3 day of 201
tj
(NOT Y PUBLIC)
My commission expires m"16 �2001_0
JANICE J C CHRA E
SEAL -STAMP Notary Public
Mecklenburg Co., North Carolina
My Commission Expires May 15 2020
No h Carolina, Coun of ` &d 1 e fI1 L"jP
I� � P Ir—C <10,, (.KMP#6 , a notary public of said county and state aforesaid,
certify that M +21 W1 personally appeared before me this day and
being duly swo ated that in his/her presence, �h �'�o5
si ed the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this � day of
ffi
201(.0
I� 1
/�
�� ��r n,� ;� (NOTARY PUBLIC)
My commission expires /'p�j& Io2 1J'D
SEAL -STAMP
JANICE J C CHRANE
Notary Public
Mecklenburg Co., North Carolina
My Commission Expires May 15, 2020

a)
a)
/ EXHIBIT A
(D(D
�
U)U0)
Lu o U �i- �®
EZ c
U O N o c
(4 C LL C3 -
p,
p, O U ij
� d
(6
^ _ Y
a
N\
I� \
4-1
I „ gyp, \
\ L
��+
AMA
Lu
Ob
\\\ N t LM
a°
.tiO
1 �4 r.+
L
5"
co 1,
\
CN
O O
C O
CD
\1 m dot

Ephemeral 1
DP -E1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.144100
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.649370
Total Points: 14.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 4.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Ephemeral 2
DP - E2
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.140880
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.642108
Total Points : 13.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
A ogy _8
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Ephemeral 3
DP - E3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.141020
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.642895
otal Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mint Hill
1
2
3
A nqV_8.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 2 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Ephemeral 4
DP -E4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.141845
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.644587
otal Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mint Hill
1
2
3
A. = 9.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 4.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Stream A
DP -S1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.151466
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.653548
Total Points: 26.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
p
e. Quad Name:
9 Mlnt Hill
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 10 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SA -Sl (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 20 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 38 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.151466
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 10:40
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): The Meadows of Cheval
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.653548
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map -.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.5 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YESNo
21. Estimated watershed land use: 15 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
65 % Forested 20 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (^
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 0.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) -% Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39
Comments:
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
2
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
>0
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
1
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion --0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
0
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
2
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
39
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream B
DP - S2
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.149510
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.652470
Total Points: 43
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 22.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SB - S2 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016 4. Time of evaluation: 11:00
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek 6. River basin: Yadkin
7. Approximate drainage area: 910 ac 8. Stream order: Second
9. Length of reach evaluated: 3,476 ft 10. County: Mecklenburg
The Meadows of Cheval and Oxford
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Glen
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.149510 Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.652470
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached man .
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1.0 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 40 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
30 % Forested 30 % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 12 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 7 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: % Flat (0 to 2%) X % Gentle (2 to 4%) % Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight Occasional bends X Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 60
Evaluator's Signature:
Comments: The stream flows through a double culvert under Thompson Road.
Date:
1
5/4/2016

This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION
POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow ---max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
2
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
>
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
2
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive deposition --0; little or no sediment--maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
3
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
(severe erosion --O; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
Cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact=0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
(little or no habitat --O; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=max points)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
U
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=maxpoints)
04
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
60
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream C
DP - S3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.141984
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.650275
otal Points: 24.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mint Hill
1
2
3
A. -_11.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SC - S3 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 30 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 72 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.141984
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 15:50
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.650275
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map _.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES DO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
95 % Forested 5 % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) -% Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 48
Comments:
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
1
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
>0
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain=max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(severe erosion=0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
48
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream D
DP -S4
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.139788
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.652344
otal Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mint Hill
1
2
3
A _
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HVdrologv (Subtotal= 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SD - S4 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 60 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 240 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.139788
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 16:20
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.652344
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map -.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES DO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
95 % Forested 5 % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 6 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) -% Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 65
Comments:
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
3
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
3
>0
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
3
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion=0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
2
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
65
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream E
DP - S5
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.139387
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.655483
Total Points: 24.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
1
2
3
A-. Geomorphology Subtotal = 10
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
ontmuity ot Channel a an an
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SE - S5 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 50 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 17 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.139387
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 16:50
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.655483
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map _.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES DO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
90 % Forested 5 % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) -% Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 50
Comments:
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
2
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
>,
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
1
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion=0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
3
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
50
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream F
DP - S6
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.138952
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.656114
Total Points: 36.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
1
2
3
f'`• Geomorphology (Subtotal =_18 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SF - S6 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 120 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 651 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.138952
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 17:00
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First and Second
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.656114
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map -.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.4 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES Nd
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial 5 % Agricultural
70 % Forested 5 % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 5 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) -% Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 60 Comments: Data point was taken where the stream is first order. Stream F
becomes second order below the confluence with Stream E for a short distance before Stream F enters Stream I.
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation --0; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
0
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
3
>0
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
4
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(severe erosion --0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
F*
(little or no habitat --O; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
60
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream G
DP - S7
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/4/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.140356
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.658425
Total Points: 34.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
1
2
3
f'`• Geomorphology (Subtotal =_16.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SG - S7 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/4/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 90 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 269 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.140356
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 17:30
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.658425
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map _.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.5 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES Nd
21. Estimated watershed land use: 70 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
20 % Forested 10 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 4 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: % Flat (0 to 2%) X % Gentle (2 to 4%) % Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 43
Comments:
5/4/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
2
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
>,
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
1
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
2
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
(severe erosion --O; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
5
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
43
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream H
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.143739
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.645640
Total Points: 20.5
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 10 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = _3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Stream H
DP - S9
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.143664
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.645594
Total Points: 37
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:Mint Hill
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SH - S9 (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/5/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 70 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 795 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.143664
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 11:50
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: First
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.645594
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map -.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Proposed stream restoration.
15. Recent weather conditions: 5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny 60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES DO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0.5 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial 10 % Agricultural
50 % Forested 20 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: loft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X % Flat (0 to 2%) % Gentle (2 to 4%) % Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 69
come together.
Comments: Perennial stream forms where an intermittent stream and wetland E
5/5/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
4
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
3
>>
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
1
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(severe erosion --0; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(substantial impact --O; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
4
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
3
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
3
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
69
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Stream I
DP -S10
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5/5/2016
Project/Site: Stevens Creek
Latitude: 35.143626
Evaluator: A. Baldwin
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.648658
otal Points
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mint Hill
1
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 25.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
J 1. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SI -SIO (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 44�
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Mecklenburg County
3. Date of evaluation: 5/5/2016
5. Name of stream: Stevens Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 2600 ac
9. Length of reach evaluated: 7,250 ft
11 Site coordinates (if known): Prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.143626
2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin
4. Time of evaluation: 13:50
6. River basin: Yadkin
8. Stream order: Third
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): Oxford Glen
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): -80.648658
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): See attached map -.
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
stream restoration.
5/1 - 1.2", 5/2 - 0.6", 5/3 - 0.2"
60's
17. Identify any special waterway classification known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? ES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 20 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 55 % Residential `% Commercial % Industrial 5 % Agricultural
25 % Forested 15 % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 15 ft
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 8 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: % Flat (0 to 2%) X % Gentle (2 to 4%) % Moderate (4 to 10%) % Steep (>10%
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends X Frequent meander % Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain,
vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the
range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should
reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in
the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comments section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review
(e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form
used to evaluated each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of
the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 80
come together.
Comments:
5/5/2016
Evaluator's Signature: / Date:
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the
data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting
from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ration or requirement. Form
subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-8776-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(no flow or saturation --O; strong flow --max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(extensive alteration --O; no alteration --max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
(no buffer=0; contiguous, wide buffer --max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical dischargers
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges=0; no discharges=max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
4
�
(no dischar a-0� springs, s, seeps, wetlands etc.=max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
4
>,
(no floodplain --O; extensive floodplain --max points)
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched=0; frequent flooding --max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
(no wetlands=0; large adjacent wetlands=max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
4
(extensive channelization=0; natural meander --max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive deposition --O; little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
4
(fine, homogeneous=0; large, diverse sizes=max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
(deeply incised=0; stable bed & banks=max points)
F-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2
(severe erosion --O; no erosion, sable banks=max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots=0; dense roots throughout --max points)
cn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(substantial impact --0; no evidence=max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
5
(no riffles/ripples or pools=0; well-developed=max points)
F'
t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
6
F*
(little or no habitat --0; frequent, varied habitats=max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
(no shading vegetation --O; continuous canopy --max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
4
(deeply embedded=0; loose structure=maxpoints)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
4
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
3
p(no
evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
(no evidence=0; common, numerous types=max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
(no evidence=0; abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
80
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: Upland DPI
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1440601 Long: -80.649394 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
21 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
D Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes [] No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Hydrology was observed but there had been an extensive amount of rain prior to the site visit. Ponding is likely to have occurred as a result of the
clay/fill material in the area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

Vt(3t I A I IUN jFive Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
70
y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Pinus toeodo
10
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Prunus serotina
5
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
42.5
20% of total cover:
17
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 180 x 3 = 540
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
80
y
FAC
FACU species 49 x4= 196
2.
Ulmus americana
10
FACW
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Carya ovata
5
FACU
Column Totals: 239 (A) 756 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
95
= Total Cover
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
47.5
20% of total cover:
19
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ligustrum sinese
5
y
FACU
2.
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Hackelia virginiana
10
y
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Porthenocissus quinquefolia
5
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Vitis sp.
2
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Unknown
2
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
49
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
24.5
20% of total cover:
9.8
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes ❑ No p
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0-22 7.5YR 5/6 100 C
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑
Histosol(A1)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Remarks:
Soil appears to be fill likely from construction of the adjacent neighborhood wastewater treatment plant.
Sampling Point: Upland DP1
Remarks
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No I]
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WA - Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1495563 Long: -80.652633 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA -Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Lirirodendron tulipifero
50
y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Liquidomborstyrocifluo
40
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Robinio pseudoacacia
10
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
FACW species 15 x2= 30
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
1.
Corpinus caroliniana
15
y
FAC
FACU species 195 x4= 780
2.
Ulmus americana
10
y
FACW
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Froxinus pennsylvanica
5
FACW
Column Totals: 315 (A) 1125 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
30
= Total Cover
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
50
y
FAC
2.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Unknown
80
y
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Podophyllum peltatum
40
y
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum acrostichoides
10
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
130
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
65
20% of total cover:
26
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes ❑ No p
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 3 10YR 3/2 100 L
3-12 7.5YR 4/6 100 CL
12-22+ 2.5Y 5/3 60 7.5YR 5/8 30 C M SCL
7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
Sampling Point: WA -Upland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No p
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WA - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1495722 Long: -80.652693 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
21
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
D
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
O High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
O Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
O Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
El
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
p
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA - Wetland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Froxinus pennsylvanica
40
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Liquidomborstyrocifluo
40
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Lirirodendron tulipifera
5
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
42.5
20% of total cover:
17
FACW species 60 x2= 120
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 110 x 3 = 330
1.
Ulmus americana
20
y
FACW
FACU species 30 x4= 120
2.
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 200 (A) 570 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.9
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
20
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
40
y
FAC
2.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
40
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Unkown
10
y
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
10
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Type'
Loc' Texture
0 - 3
10YR 2/2 95
7.5YR 4/6
5 C
PL L
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
3-11
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
10YR 5/3 55
7.5YR 5/8
35 C
M SCL
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
7.5YR 4/6
10 C
PL
11-18+
10YR 5/1 60
7.5YR 6/6
30 C
M C
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
7.5YR 4/6
10 C
PL
Sampling Point: WA - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WB - Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1478046 Long: -80.651839 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
D
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
D
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
El
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
p
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN jFive Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB - Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidombor styrociflua
50
y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Liriodendron tulipifiero
20
y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3.
luglons nigra
15
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4.
Coryo ovoto
10
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
Ulmus americana
5
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
FACW species 25 x2= 50
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 110 x3= 330
1.
Catalpa bignonioides
15
y
FACU
FACU species 84 x4= 336
2.
Ulmus americana
10
y
FACW
UPI -species 0 X5= 0
3.
Acer socchorinum
10
y
FACW
Column Totals: 219 (A) 716 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.3
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
35
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
17.5
20% of total cover:
7
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
20
y
FAC
2.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
20
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
15
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Unknown
2
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
54
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
27
20% of total cover:
10.8
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
y
FAC
Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
y
FACU
3.
4.
5.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0-4 7.5YR 3/3 100 SL
4-22 7.5YR 4/6 100
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches)
Remarks:
SCL
Sampling Point: WB - Upland
Remarks
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No I]
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WB - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1495722 Long: -80.652693 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
21
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
D
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
O High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
O Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
O Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
El
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
p
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN jFive Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB - Wetland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
60
y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2.
Acer rubrum
20
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Ulmus americana
5
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
42.5
20% of total cover:
17
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 165 x 3 = 495
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
y
FAC
FACU species 16 x4= 64
2.
Ulmus americana
10
y
FACW
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 196 (A) 589 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
40
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
20
y
FAC
2.
Corya ovoto
5
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
Ligustrum sinese
2
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
Celtis occidentalis
2
FACU
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
29
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
14.5
20% of total cover:
5.8
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
25
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum acrostichoides
5
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Unknown
2
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
37
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18.5
20% of total cover:
7.4
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Toxicodendron rodicons
5
y
FAC
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Type'
Loc' Texture
0 - 6
10YR 4/3 95
7.5YR 4/6
5 C
PL SCL
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
6-12
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
10YR 5/6 70
10YR 6/1
30 D
M SCL
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
12-18+
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
10YR 5/6 55
10YR 6/1
40 D
M C
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q
7.5YR 5/8
5 C
M
Sampling Point: WB - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WC - Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1443618 Long: -80.649269 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

VtCit I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC- Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Ulmus americana
30
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
luglons nigra
10
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4.
Liriodendron tulipifiero
10
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
70
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
14
FACW species 60 x2= 120
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
1.
Froxinus pennsylvanica
20
y
FACW
FACU species 77 x4= 308
2.
Ulmus americana
10
y
FACW
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
y
FAC
Column Totals: 237 (A) 728 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.1
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
40
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
2.
Ligustrum sinese
15
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
45
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
22.5
20% of total cover:
9
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Hackelia virginiana
35
y
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
20
y
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Microstegium vimineum
15
FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Toxicodendron rodicons
5
FAC
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Porthenocissus quinquefolia
2
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
77
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38.5
20% of total cover:
15.4
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Smilax sp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 2 7.5YR 3/2 100 SL
2-19+ 7.5YR 4/4 100
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches)
Remarks:
SCL
Sampling Point: WC -Upland
Remarks
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No I]
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/4/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WC - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1443976 Long: -80.649301 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
21 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
O
Drainage Patterns (610)
D Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
D
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
El
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC - Wetland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Liriodendron tulipifiero
20
y
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
80
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
SO% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
FACW species 80 x 2 = 160
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
1.
Celtis occidentalis
15
y
FACU
FACU species 80 x4= 320
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
y
FAC
UPI -species 0 x 5= 0
3.
Acer rubrum
5
FAC
Column Totals: 250 (A) 750 (B)
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
35
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
17.5
20% of total cover:
7
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
40
y
FAC
2.
Ligustrum sinese
15
y
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
55
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
SO% of total cover:
27.5
20% of total cover:
11
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Pilea pumila
35
y
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
15
y
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Podophyllum peltatum
10
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Hockelio virginiono
5
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
5
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6.
Lonicero japonica
5
FACU
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
75
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
37.5
20% of total cover:
15
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitis sp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Type'
Loc' Texture
0 - 6
7.5YR 3/2 95
7.5YR 3/4
5 C
PL SL
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
6-12
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
10YR 5/2 60
SYR 4/4
15 C
PL SCL
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
7.5YR 4/4
25 C
M
12-18+
10YR 5/2 50
5YR 4/4
20 C
PL C
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
7.5YR 4/4
30 C
M
Sampling Point: WC - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
D
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WD - Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1439983 Long: -80.648644 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD -Upland
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liriodendron tulipifiero
40 y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Liquidambarstyracifluo
35 y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Pinus toedo
5
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
80 = Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 165 x 3 = 495
1.
Liquidambar styracifluo
50 y
FAC
FACU species 160 x4= 640
2.
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 325 (A) 1135 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50 = Total Cover
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
20 y
FAC
2.
Liquidambarstyracifluo
5
FAC
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
Ligustrum sinese
5
FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
30 = Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Hackelia virginiana
80 y
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum acrostichoides
20
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Microstegium vimineum
20
FAC
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
FACU
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6.
Pteridium aquilinum
5
FACU
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
160 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
80
20% of total cover:
32
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes ❑ No p
1.
Vitissp.
5 y
FACU
Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2.5
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 2 7.5YR 3/2 100 L
2-14 7.5YR 4/6 100 SCL
14-18+ 7.5YR 5/3 55 10YR 6/2 35 D M C
SYR 4/6 10 C PL
Sampling Point: WD -Upland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No p
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WD - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1440585 Long: -80.648635 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
21
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
21 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
O
Drainage Patterns (610)
D Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
D
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
17
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
17
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

vt(,t I A I lulu jFive btrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sai
Dominance Test Workshe
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Point: WD - Wetland
5 (A)
6 (B)
83% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 200 x 3 = 600
FACU species 65 x4= 260
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 265 (A) 860 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius Vegetation
1. Toxicodendron radicans 5 y FAC Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes O No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
60
y
FAC
2.
Liriodendron tulipifiera
10
FACU
3.
Ulmus ameircana
10
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
80
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
11
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
50
y
FAC
2.
Ulmus ameircana
5
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
55
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
27.5 20% of total cover:
1:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
40
y
FAC
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
FAC
3.
Corpinus coroliniona
10
FAC
4.
Ligustrum sinese
5
FACU
5.
Celtis occidentalis
5
FACU
6.
Ulmus ameircana
5
FACU
7.
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
37.5 20% of total cover:
1!
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
15
y
FAC
2.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
10
y
FACU
3.
Acer rubrum
5
FAC
4.
Porthenocissus quinquefolia
5
FACU
5.
Compsis radicans
5
FAG
6.
Hackelia virginiona
5
FACU
7.
Unknown
5
FACU
8.
9.
50
= Total Cover
Sai
Dominance Test Workshe
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Point: WD - Wetland
5 (A)
6 (B)
83% (A/B)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 200 x 3 = 600
FACU species 65 x4= 260
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 265 (A) 860 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10 Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius Vegetation
1. Toxicodendron radicans 5 y FAC Present?
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes O No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Type'
Loc' Texture
0 - 2
10YR 3/2 100
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
L
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
2-10
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
7.5YR 4/6 75
10YR 6/2
15 D
M SCL
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
5YR 4/6
10 C
M
10-17+
2.5Y 7/1 75
10YR 6/8
20 C
M C
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
5YR 4/6
5 C
PL
Sampling Point: WD - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
D
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WG -Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.141491 Long: -80.639519 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeB2- Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
D
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WG - Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Ulmus americana
40
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2.
Pinus toedo
25
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Coryo ovoto
20
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
42.5
20% of total cover:
17
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 140 x 3 = 420
1.
Liquidambarstyracifluo
30
y
FAC
FACU species 80 x4= 320
2.
Acer rubrum
30
y
FAC
UPI -species 0 x5= 0
3.
Column Totals: 260 (A) 820 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
60
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
2.
Unknown
30
y
FACU
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
60
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
y
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Microstegium vimineum
15
y
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Vitis sp.
5
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
45
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
22.5
20% of total cover:
9
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 6 7.5YR 3/4 100 SCL
6-17+ SYR 4/6 100
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches)
Remarks:
SCL
Sampling Point: WG - Upland
Remarks
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No I]
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WG - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1414365 Long: -80.639603 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeB2- Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% NWI Classification: PEM
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
21
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
C] High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
O
Drainage Patterns (610)
D Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
El
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
p
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 1-5
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN jFive Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WG - Wetland
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10 y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Acer rubrum
10
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Celtis occidentalis
5
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Platanus occidentalis
5
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
30 = Total Cover
OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
FACW species 10 x2= 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 45 x3= 135
1.
FACU species 90 x4= 360
2.
UPI -species 5 x 5 = 25
3.
Column Totals: 175 (A) 565 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 = Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
0
20% of total cover:
0
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20 y
FAC
2.
Salix nigra
10
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
30 = Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Grass
80 y
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Sedge
15
OBL
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
'uncus effusus
5
FACW
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Herb
5
UPL
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
105 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
52.5
20% of total cover:
21
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitis SP.
5 y
FACU
Present?
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
5 y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Type'
Loc' Texture
0 - 1
10YR 3/2 100
5YR 4/6
5 C
PL L
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
1 - 8
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
SYR 4/4 60
10YR 4/2
35 D
M SCL
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
5YR 4/6
5 C
PL
8-17+
SYR 4/4 85
10YR 5/2
10 D
M C
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
10YR 6/6
5 C
PL
Sampling Point: WG - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
I] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: VVE - Upland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1435447 Long: -80.646527 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: NA
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No El Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ID within a wetland? Yes ❑ No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No D
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑
Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ❑ No p
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN (Five Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE - Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liriodendron tulipifiero
40
y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Liquidomborstyrocifluo
20
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Ulmus americana
10
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
4.
Quercus phellos
5
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
75
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
37.5
20% of total cover:
15
FACW species 10 x2= 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
1.
Corpinus caroliniana
5
y
FAC
FACU species 85 x4= 340
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
5
y
FAC
UPI -species 0 x 5= 0
3.
Column Totals: 195 (A) 660 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.4
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
10
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
2.
Ligustrum sinese
5
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
35
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
17.5
20% of total cover:
7
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Hockelia virginiana
15
y
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
10
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Lonicera japonica
10
FACU
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
65
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
32.5
20% of total cover:
13
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
Toxicodendron rodicons
5
y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 5 7.5YR 3/2 100 L
5-14+ SYR 4/6 100
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches)
Remarks:
SCL
Sampling Point: WE - Upland
Remarks
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No I]
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Stevens Creek Stream Restoration City/County: Mint Hill/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 5/5/2016
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency State: NC Sampling Point: WE - Wetland
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & C. Conner Section, Township, Range:
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR - P Lat: 35.1435804 Long: -80.646564 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MO - Monocan loam, 0-2% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes DNo ❑(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d Soil [3 or Hydrology C]nificantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Nop ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil Q or Hydrology i❑turally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
aurvnvuAKT ur rnvunvu.3 - iAuacn site map snowing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes O No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all
that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
O Surface Water (Al)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
21 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
O
Drainage Patterns (610)
D Saturation (A3)
❑
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
D
Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (133)
p
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
17
FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes El No
❑
Depth (inches): -1
Saturation Present? Yes p No
❑
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

V t(3t I A I IUN jFive Jtrata) - use sclentltic names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE - Wetland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Liquidombor styrociflua
40
y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2.
Quercus phellos
10
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 86% (A/B)
6.
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
FACW species 50 x2= 100
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
1.
Corpinus caroliniana
20
y
FAC
FACU species 15 x4= 60
2.
Ulmus americana
10
FACW
UPI -species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 190 (A) 535 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.8
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
30
= Total Cover
17 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 5 3.01
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
❑ 4 - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
30
y
FAC
2.
Ligustrum sinese
5
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4.
5.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
6.
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
35
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
50% of total cover:
17.5
20% of total cover:
7
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius-)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Arundinaria gigantea
40
y
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
20
y
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
Polystichum ocrostichoides
5
FACU
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
6•
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
7.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
8
ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
65
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
32.5
20% of total cover:
13
Hydrophytic
Woody Vine Stratu (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Vegetation Yes O No ❑
1.
Vitissp.
5
y
FACU
Present?
2.
Toxicodendron rodicons
5
y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture
0 - 2 7.5YR 4/2 100 L
2-17+ 7.5YR 5/2 60 7.5YR 5/1 5 D M SCL
7.5YR 4/6 30 SYR 4/6 5 C M
Sampling Point: WE - Wetland
Remarks
1Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
zLocation: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils;:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
D
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR TU)
❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
(LRR N, MLRA 147, 148)
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
I
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No p
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region - Version 2.0

Stevens Creek - Photos
Photo 1. Stream A - Intermittent - facing
downstream data point S1
Photo 2. Stream B - Perennial - facing
downstream data point S2
Photo 3. Stream C - Intermittent - facing
downstream data point S3
Photo 4. Stream D - Perennial - facing
downstream data point S4
Photo 4. Stream E - Intermittent - facing
downstream data point S5
Photo 5. Stream F - Perennial - facing
downstream data point S6

Photo 7. Stream G - Perennial - facing
downstream data point S7
}} I , L
�r..v
Photo 9. Stream H - Intermittent/Perennial break -
facing downstream data point S9
r
�`�•--"�,��' +�� -.< 4� °�' as -y-
Photo 8. Stream H - Ephemeral/Intermittent
break - facing downstream data point S8
Photo 10. Stream I - Perennial - facing
downstream data point S10
4 F,
w'AS ✓" asp _5
t q '
Photo 11. Ephemeral 1 - facing northwest data Photo 12. Ephemeral 2 - facing north data
point El point E2

Photo 13. Ephemeral 3 - facing north data point
E3
Photo 16. Wetland A - wetland data point
Photo 14. Ephemeral 4 - facing north data
point E4
Photo 15. Upland - upland data point 1
Photo 17. Wetland A - upland data point

W.�iv
•A.
', 4r
-f. i AA '• yE�' � �6�� Y' EST S
s,
', 4r
-f. i AA '• yE�' � �6�� Y' EST S

11
\ 2
J
G
J
Fairvibw
218
•1. V `.
i
51 Matthews '
Stallings
• i% 601
/ �H r by,Briiige
Lake Park
t1
Indian Trail' pp
tl ° •'Unionville
74 TO
0
r
Vicinity Map
Stevens Creek Stream
Q Project Study Area Major Roads Restoration Project
Pender County, North Carolina
I I County Boundary Streams
Municipalities Waterbodies
Date Mecklenburg County Figure
Land Use & g
0 0.5 1 2 7/2016 Environmental Services Agency 1
Miles 9,

51
74
' '�... 4 .-.-. -_ .i Y 4 i1• -� '} .1.Z. 'til 'rr'•''4-"-'
Iso
'bkf
*.- .I
1' i:F• 'a _ r
ry 1
.1• i 1' 111 ]1 �V i F r
21
. ` ` 1 .a f�i.�t�t1 _S .• •
Project Study Area
Q Project Study Area Stevens Creek Stream
Major Roads Restoration Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
USGS 7.5 Min Topoquad:
Mint Hill ��
Date �, Mecklenburg County Figure
t.' Land Use & g
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 iles 7/2016 - " 4/ Environmental Services Agency 2

B
CeD2
CeB2
V.
W
HeB
Ce
CeB2
rte•• - -�-'-r �_ � - . M. --. mar.-,..ar �b .. .,4 zs--r -� i Gj
0
�° Va D
a Ce
CeD2 m �a�yerSR
U
MeD CeB2 d - GeB2
CeB2 CeD2 Th°mpsp° R CeB2
GeD2
- t
Ge
co
i p
Fie CeB2
CeB2
CeB2 CeB2
-
B C��se C
r=
CeGeB2
CeD2 CeD2 NC OneMap, NC Center for Gepgraphic,lnformation and Analysis, NC 911 Board
Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Stevens Creek Stream
Project Study Area Soil Map Units within PSA HeB- Helena sandy MeB- Mecklenburg Restoration Project
Major Roads CeB2- Cecil sandy loam, 2-8% [HYDRIC fine sandy loam, 2-
Hydrography (NHD)
clay loam, 2-8% B] 8%
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CeD2- sandy clay or MO- Monocan loam, PaE- Pacolet sandy
loam 8-15% 0-2/° [HYDRIC B] loam, 15-25% Date Mecklenburg County Figure
f ; :� ;-I Land Use &
7/2016 ► J, Environmental Services Agency 3

y+...Ilk,
cL^
;�';�
• AIL,.}�. �i tY 1:�• ,11 ,�� + F:q�' �cr,
14 r,i11'�A IY�' ` `+ ` •Y .t Qi
'A.
H
IN
-60
IL
t:
a
v
s � ¢—L
tee :, ;::�.'' �' • • �`'� J� "'
ns Creek ' ` r • .:-'';., G�
Project Study Area NWI Polygons within PSA PUBHh- Palustrine
Major Roads PF01A- Palustrine Forested Unconsolidated Bottom
Broad -Leaved Deciduous Permanently Flooded
Hydrography (NHD) Temporarily Flooded Diked/Impounded
x - -� .. _,•._ . ,, -mos
N'C-OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, N
Mecklenburg County National Wetland Inventory
Stevens Creek Stream
Restoration Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Date, Mecklenburg County Figure
;-! Land Use &
7/2016► Environmental Services Agency 4
.,

N
'if! �riYi�.fo.
y..
111, rr
-�J - 1
ass ,f'`` :.

19507103 ..
19508131 WB -I
oB WA -5° WA -3 WB -00
19507114 WA -4 oWA_2 S2WB o .,.
WB -
0 °
Pr QWA-6o
_ WB -1 1 o o
0 0 s
o ° __ r�19508152 WA 6o WAWA1,' WB -3'
° _
S1 WA WA -1
�~.
- Zwwl
WA -70 o WA -3' 19508155 19508156 19508157
19507105 0 0 °WA -4' 19508158 SB
WA -7' o WA -5'
- _ X50 1t5 WA 6, 19508159
19508161
19508151 195083 19508154
0 87.5 175 350 Feet
IN
C
G
as�,\eVdO�
Project Study Area Data Points
Parcels Ephemeral
Culverts Stream
Hydrography Upland
(outside study area) Wetland
�J�� Wetlands o Wetland Flags
��/� Intermittent Stream Date
Perennial Stream
9/2016
4'' � �w
Jurisdictional
Jurisdictional Features
Stevens Creek Stream
Restoration Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Mecklenburg County
Land Use &
► .f ���' Environmental Services Agency
0
CO
0 -
Figure
5-1

19508105
a
o
coF
0
)CS
1g5171p4
Oit
195171$5
WD' 10
WD -11 0 o WD -9
WD_ 120 0
°Wp-8
WC -80 WC-900
oWD-7
WC -7o WD WD WD -6
WC 1p oWD-0 5
WC 0 0 0 oWD °Wp 3 0WD-4
2
195171$0 WC -50 WC ow�-1j s10
0
WC -4o 0
WC -3 0 oWC-12
SB W _ WC -0
E1
1g517148 Up DP1
Bexley PI
C�
f -
0 8.7.5 175 350 Feet
Jurisdictional Features
Project Study Area Data Points Stevens Creek Stream
Parcels Ephemeral Restoration Project
Culverts Stream
Hydrography Upland
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
OX Wetland
(outside study area) Wetland
J�'40\ J��,���� Wetlands o Wetland Flags gum
�4 ��o G° Intermittent Stream Date��s Mand IUse &g County Figure
t t
Perennial Stream 9/2016► Environmental Services Agency 5-2
i

�a
N 0
o� o
� N
LO
o � O
L
cS
N LO
r N O P
rn \ N
N O
N c9
O
L
U
4
Ya Doth Rd
c9
> > LO JIMT
N LO
S,
T
O rn
VI O f -
A, O
-1 9
N O chi
•. N N �
O
co S5'•.
do
UOLP
w
o �
rn �
175 350 Feet
U)
n
Project Study Area Data Points
Parcels Ephemeral
Culverts Stream
Hydrography Upland
(outside study area) Wetland
Wetlands o Wetland Flags
Intermittent Stream Date
Perennial Stream 9/2016
CO
S4
Jurisdictional Features
Stevens Creek Stream
Restoration Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
su�
Mecklenburg County
Land Use &
► � Environmental Services Agency
Figure
5-3

Yarmouth Rd F. h 10
S I
Vol
PA
• k #4 ' � �Y' y M y
If
bp
GGeo o O o 0 0
?� o
1' E4 a �� 4_ o
W G
}. '•:, ... o �Ate'
�?,
0
�oj /0
o a
L E2
0 87.5 175 350 Feet
Jurisdictional Features
Project Study Area Data Points Stevens Creek Stream
Parcels Ephemeral Restoration Project
Culverts Stream
Hydrography Upland
(outside study area) Wetland Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Wetlands o Wetland Flags guy
Intermittent Stream Date 1" Mecklenburg County Figure
t;-! Land Use &
Perennial Stream
�,� J 9I201 6 Environmental Services Agency rj-rj