20180264 Ver 1 _Mit Plan IRT Draft _20180221

MITIGATION PLAN
Draft for IRT Review
February 13, 2018
DEEP MEADOW MITIGATION PLAN
Union County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 6887
DMS ID No. 97131
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040105
USACE Action ID No. 2017-00241
RFP #: 16-006785
PREPARED FOR:
7k;
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
W
I I DLANDS
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
MEMORANDUM
TO: Harry Tsomides, NC DMS
FROM: Aaron Earley, PE
DATE: February 20, 2018
RE: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Union County, NC
Yadkin River Basin Cataloging Unit 03040105
Response to Mitigation Plan Comments
This memo documents NCDMS's initial Draft Mitigation Plan review comments (in italics) received from
Harry Tsomides' letter dated 01/03/18, the project team's responses, and where the revisions have
been included in the final Mitigation Plan.
COVER PAGE / GENERAL/ FORMATTING
Please confirm that Wildlands have followed the DMS mitigation plan guidance or have explained where
and why any of the guidelines may not have been followed.
RESPONSE: The document was reviewed for compliance with the October 2015 DMS mitigation plan
guidance.
File properties indicate the title "Little Troublesome Creek and Irvin Creek". Please correct.
RESPONSE: The Adobe file properties were changed to remove the Little Troublesome title.
Footers in Table of Contents indicate "Martin Dairy Mitigation Site". Please correct.
RESPONSE: Footers were corrected to say Deep Meadow Mitigation Site.
There are multiple instances where an internal reference points to the wrong section number, while
some of these are noted in the following comments, the entire document should be QA/QC'd for internal
accuracy and consistency in this regard.
RESPONSE: All internal references were checked and revised as needed.
Please add tabs for sections, appendices, etc. for the distribution hard copies.
RESPONSE: Tabs will be added to the hard copies for distribution.

1.0 Introduction
Total LF is indicated as 4368 however the existing footage/ acreage in Table 18 (assets) indicates 4411
LF. Please resolve this apparent difference.
RESPONSE: The linear footage in the introduction was changed to coincide with Table 18.
2.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions
Please indicate in this section that the preliminary JD can be found in Appendix 2 and indicate the USACE
action ID and date.
RESPONSE: The USACE action ID and reference to Appendix 2 was added to this section.
3.1.2 - Geology and Soils
(a) Paragraph 1. Sentences 3 & 4: What effects does geology have on hydro, hydraulics, geomorphology
and sediment transport? Is sentence 3 related to sentence 4? Please clarify.
RESPONSE: Sentence 3 was deleted to avoid ambiguity.
(b) Suggest deleting "of drainage area" in the Guise and Mason reference (it is redundant).
RESPONSE: "Of drainage area" was deleted.
(c) Last sentence - you mentioned above that streams are incised, is the "process" related to
Streambank vegetation and erosion due to slate belt rocks/piedmont or to incision?
RESPONSE: "Process" was replaced with "low baseflow" for clarification.
(d) Paragraph 2. The lack of shallow bedrock is not justification for intervention. There are plenty of
deep soils with "stable" streams flowing through them. Please clarify.
RESPONSE: Clarification was added to the second paragraph. In streams that are actively incising, the
lack of shallow bedrock is a concern.
3.0 Functional Uplift Potential
Wildlands Technical Proposal noted that habitat was identified along Meadow Branch which may
support two state -listed protected mussel species, Carolina creekshell and Savannah lilliput, and that the
project would improve habitat for these species. Wildlands was awarded 10 bonus points during the
scoring for the project based on the project improving habitat for these listed species. These species are
not mentioned in the plan. Please clarify in Section 4.5 (Biology) and/or Table 6 (Goals and Objectives)
if/how the project will benefit these species.
RESPONSE: Discussion of habitat enhancement for these two species was added to section 4.5 and
mentioned in Table 6.
2

5.0 Regulatory Considerations
FEMA section states "A decrease in upstream flooding elevations is possible. The valley slope of EF1
coming out of the existing road culvert will be kept relatively steep (??%), so the
risk of backwater into the culvert is negligible." Please provide the anticipated slope % there appears to
be a placeholder still here for this.
RESPONSE: The slope was added to the sentence.
It is stated "Table 4, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site. These considerations
are expanded upon in Sections 6.1-6.3.". The appropriate reference sections appear to be 5.1-5.3 rather
than 6.1-6.3.
RESPONSE: The reference was revised.
There should be some response in this section to the project requests made in the USFWS response letter.
RESPONSE: Detail was added to this section that responds to the requests made by USFWS.
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
It is stated "The project will improve stream and wetland functions as described in Section 5...". Stream
and wetland functions are described in Section 4. Another referencing error appears later in the same
paragraph.
RESPONSE: The reference was revised.
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
It is stated "The design approach for this Site was developed to meet the goals and objectives described
in Section 7 which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 5." The Goals
and Objectives are described in Section 6, and the potential for uplift is described in Section 4.
RESPONSE: The reference was revised.
It is stated "Sources used to set the wetland performance standard for the site include discussions with
the IRT and LSS, Table 1 (wetland saturation threshold values) within the Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update dated October 24, 2016, and reference well data from an
upstream floodplain wetland adjacent to Meadow Branch.". It was noted during the 7/20/2016 meeting
with the IRT that a suitable potential reference wetland area existed on the parcel north of the proposed
project parcel in the left floodplain of Meadow Branch (PIN 09043010). Is the "upstream floodplain
wetland adjacent to Meadow Branch" the some area walked with the IRT? The reference well location
should be noted in Figure 5.
RESPONSE: The "upstream floodplain wetland adjacent to Meadow Branch" is not the same area walked
with the IRT. Wildlands was not able to obtain permission from the property owner on the parcel north
of the proposed project parcel to install a reference gauge. DMS and the IRT were notified via email on
12/9/2016 that Wildlands was unable to obtain the required permissions from the adjacent property
owner. The alternate reference wetland used by Wildlands is not within the extents of Figure S. The
refence well location was added to Figure 3 as an alternative.

The 2015 DMS Mitigation Plan guidance states "If reference wetlands are used, provide all applicable
information relating to location, hydrology, hydroperiod, soils, landscape positions, and gauge locations.
". Please provide more detail on the reference wetland and clarify how the reference wetland gage
contributed towards determining success criteria.
RESPONSE: "Section 7.7.2 Reference Wetland" was added to the mitigation plan to provide further
information about the reference wetland area.
Section 7.3 - Please indicate why standard design parameters are not applicable to WF1, Table 9. The
plan sheets and morphology table indicates dimensional adjustment and log sill installation for bed
stability and habitat enhancement and stream classification change from G to C.
RESPONSE: Applicable design parameters for WF1 were added to Table 9.
Section 7.5 - Sediment Transport Analysis - Where/what is the "major sediment source" addressed in the
sediment transport analysis? If the source is currently streambanks, and that source is abated by
restoration, what sediment is this analysis addressing?
Additionally, what bedload will be moved as referenced in the competence analysis? You previously
mentioned that this system has "low" bedload supply.
If sediment will be not a problem following restoration, that is what needs to be described or discussed.
RESPONSE: Additional details were added to section 7.5 that clarified that the primary source of
sediment is eroding stream banks and that restoration will fix that. Competence analysis was performed
to help determine the required size of substrate in the restored riffles.
Section 7.7.2 Groundwater modeling - Sources used to set the performance standards for the wetland
hydrology are listed as Table 1 in the 10/2016 USACE guidance document, discussions with the IRT, and
reference well data. Table 1 indicates a target hydrology for Chewacla soils as 10 —12% the reference
data in the graph presented appears to indicate roughly 60 days of inundation/saturation during the
growing season. If IRT correspondence is available to support 8.8% hydrology standard, suggest
including this in the report. The meeting minutes included indicate Wehadkee inclusions and discussion
of a greater wetland hydroperiod based on infield examination of soils. The proposed wetland
enhancement (rehabilitation) areas do not seem to have been updated in the current version of the plan
based on the USA CEJ.D. included.
RESPONSE: It is Wildlands' understanding that wetland rehabilitation is restoration, not enhancement.
Reference well data submitted with the original mitigation plan was inaccurate. Wildlands investigated
and gauged multiple reference wetland areas prior to wetland restoration design to determine the most
applicable reference site. Data shown in the original reference wetland hydrograph from 1/4/17 to
5/3/17 was from a prior wetland reference location which Wildlands determined to be heavily
influenced by an adjacent spring seep (hence the lack of fluctuation in the hydrograph during this
period). The reference gage was relocated to the chosen reference site on 5/4/17; data from the chosen
site showed 19.5 days of consecutive saturation representing 8.6% of the growing season for the
monitored period which is consistent with the lower target hydrology chosen for design. "Section 7.7.2
Reference Wetland" was added to the mitigation plan to provide further information about the
4

reference wetland area. The raw data and the wetland reference hydrograph were updated in Appendix
4 to represent this change.
IRT correspondence via meeting minutes noted that wetland performance criteria were listed between
7.5% and 12% within proposal documentation. IRT members indicated that a wetland hydroperiod
higher than the minimum listed (7.5%) in the proposal would be required for the site. No indication of a
minimum of 10% was identified during IRT discussions. Wildlands took the recommendation of Table 1
in the USACE guidance document into consideration, however, based on reference well data and
previous site experience a performance criteria of 20 consecutive days (8.8%) was ultimately chosen.
While it was noted that wetter areas of the site are indicative of Wehadkee soils, these were isolated
areas and most Site soils were indicative of Chewacla, therefore Wildlands set performance criteria
based on Chewacla Soils. Wetland rehabilitation areas were updated based on the current version of the
USACE J.D. See comment response for Section 12.0 - Determination of Credits below for further details.
8.0 Performance Standards
Per the 2015 DMS Mitigation Plan guidance, this section should describe methodology, data and/or
other information to show how each performance standard will be used for analysis and interpretation
to determine success, and should illustrate how each performance standard is measurable and linked to
objectives. This information is not in the Performance Standards section.
RESPONSE: This section was revised to describe methodology and discuss how performance standards
will help meet project objectives.
It is stated "The final performance criteria for the wetland hydrology will be a groundwater level within
12 inches of the soil profile for a minimum of 8.8% (20 consecutive days) of the growing season (March
23 through November 6). Final success criteria will be determined through comparison with reference
wetland hydrology in the design phase of the project." Please clarify why Wildlands cannot determine
final wetland success criteria at this time.
RESPONSE: Wildlands understands that the proposed performance criteria listed for wetland hydrology
is final. The sentence regarding reference wetland criteria was removed from the report.
Section 8.2 Performance Standards — Vegetation
If this project is subject to 2016 USACE monitoring guidelines a height standard must be included in the
performance standards.
RESPONSE: This project was awarded May 3, 2016 and the USACE guidance was released in October
2016. It is our understanding that the 2003 guidance, which does not have a height requirement, is
applicable to this Site.
Section 8.2 Performance Standards — Wetlands
If this project is subject to 2016 USACE monitoring guidelines, the hydrology standard for Chewacla soil is
between 10 —12%.
RESPONSE: Wildlands took USACE monitoring guidelines into consideration while setting hydrology
standards but used multiple evaluation methods outlined in the comment response above to determine
final hydrology criteria. Please see the response to the Section 7.72 comment for further clarification.
5

9.0 Monitoring Plan
It is stated "Annual monitoring data will be reported using the DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting
Template (April 2015)". Please update to indicate that the current template version of June 2017 will be
used (DMS 2017). Please consider the use of the most updated templates subsequently referred to (as
built/baseline and CO Report). The changes made in subsequent versions are minor but important.
RESPONSE: The version of the DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting Template was changed to reference
the June 2017 version.
10.0 Long -Term Management Plan
It is stated "The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General
Statue GS 113A -232(d)(3). "Statue" needs to be changed to "Statute".
RESPONSE: Spelling was revised.
It is stated "Any livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility the
owner of the underlying fee to maintain". Missing word: "...responsibility the owner... " should be
changed to "...responsibility of the owner...".
RESPONSE: "Of" was added to the sentence.
12.0 Determination of Credits
Wetland rehabilitation does not result in the gain of an aquatic resource area, areas not currently
jurisdictional are not eligible for rehabilitation. The areas indicated in green as designated wetland
rehabilitation areas do not appear on the current jurisdictional determination in the appendices and the
existing jurisdictional acreage is less than the proposed wetland rehabilitation. If reestablishment is
being performed or pursued in any or all of these areas, please adjust the plan accordingly, or clarify how
areas not flagged as verified wetlands could warrant rehabilitation.
RESPONSE: Wildlands corrected the wetland restoration approach for the site and associated
determination of credits. Areas delineated as jurisdictional wetlands were slated for wetland
rehabilitation and areas outside of jurisdictional delineations which were deemed relic wetland areas for
potential restoration based on the included License Soil Scientist boring study and documented IRT
discussions were deemed wetland re-establishment.
It is stated "Mitigation credits presented in Table 18 are projections based upon the proposed design.
Upon completion of construction, the project components and credits data will be revised to be
consistent with the as -built condition. Current IRT guidance indicates that mitigation plan -approved
credits will provide the final basis for credit. Please indicate that the project components and credits data
will be revised if necessary with explanations of how and why any adjustments occurred, and that as -
built stream linear feet will be based on as -built channel center lines for credit determinations.
RESPONSE: Clarification of credit determination and as -built adjustments were added to the first
paragraph.
0

It is stated "Appendix 9 contains detailed credit calculations and credit release schedule." Appendix 9
contains the credit release schedule however does not contain any detailed credit calculations.
RESPONSE: Removed "detailed credit calculations" reference from the second paragraph.
TABLES
Table 4. Attributes
Coastal Zone Management Act — 'Resolved?' should be N/A rather than No since it is not an applicable
act.
RESPONSE: Changed to N/A.
Table 5. Impacts
Meadow Branch impacts are categorized as E1 activities, however Meadow Branch is being submitted
for E2 credit. Please clarify or footnote accordingly why the impact is an E1 -type impact along some
sections even though only E2 credit will be generated for Meadow Branch.
RESPONSE: Changed table impact to E2.
Table 6. Goals and Obiectives
Indicate or footnote what "LWD" refers to (e.g., large woody debris)
RESPONSE: Clarification of the LWD acronym was added to Table 6.
In the "Restore and enhance native floodplain and wetland vegetation" section there should be some
mention of how the project will help address invasive wetland/aquatic vegetation (e.g., parrot feather,
etc.)
RESPONSE: Discussion of invasive species treatment techniques was added to Table 6.
Table 13. Functional Impairments
Wetland re-establishment is not restoration (see comment above in 12.0, Determination of Credits).
RESPONSE: It is Wildlands understanding that wetland re-establishment is restoration, and with that in
mind, Wildlands updated the wetland restoration approach for the site and associated determination of
credits. Areas delineated as jurisdictional wetlands were slated for wetland rehabilitation and areas
outside of jurisdictional delineations which were deemed relic wetland areas for potential restoration
based on the included License Soil Scientist boring study and documented IRT discussions were deemed
wetland re-establishment.
Table 16. Monitoring Components
The Table needs to be QA/QC'd against Figure 11 (Monitoring Map). Several mismatches were found.
RESPONSE: The proposed monitoring plan for the Site has been updated in both Table 16 and Figure 11.
7

Table 18. Asset Table
(1) Table format does not follow the 2015 excel template (available from DMS); please revise and follow
the table template; if possible please format the final table so it all appears on one page and not split
across two pages.
RESPONSE: The table was revised to match the 2015 Excel template.
(2) All stream assets should be reported and summed to the nearest tenth SMU; wetlands to the nearest
hundredth SMU;
RESPONSE: All asset number were listed to the tenth and hundredth accordingly.
(3) Wetland Re-establishment indicates 5.2 acres generating 9.5 WMU, please clarify or correct;
RESPONSE: Wildlands corrected the wetland restoration approach for the site and associated
determination of credits. Areas delineated as jurisdictional wetlands were slated for wetland
rehabilitation and areas outside of jurisdictional delineations which were deemed relic wetland areas for
potential restoration based on the included License Soil Scientist boring study and documented IRT
discussions were deemed wetland re-establishment. The Asset Table (Table 18) was updated to show
Wetland Re-establishment of 8.20 acres generating 8.20 WMUs (1:1 mitigation ratio) and Wetland
Rehabilitation of 0.60 acres generating 0.40 WMUs (1.5:1 mitigation ratio).
(4) Wetlands should have IDs other than "Wetland Rehabilitation" and "Wetland Re-establishment'; this
is already indicated in the "Approach" column. Wetlands should be given IDs such as Wetland 1, Wetland
2, or A, B, etc.; update Table 13 accordingly
RESPONSE: Wetlands were given individual notation per area and restoration approach. Wetlands
labeled WH are proposed for rehabilitation and wetlands labeled WE are proposed for re-establishment.
Table 18, Table 13, plans, and figures were updated to include this notation.
(5) WF2 does not have an existing length listed; should this be 391 as indicated in the impact table?
RESPONSE: An existing length of 391 LF was added for WF2.
(6) footnote refers generally to exclusions but please list LF of easement exclusions by reach in a
comments column;
RESPONSE: Exclusions are noted in the comments column.
(7) proposed stationing lengths do not match up with restored lengths; if this is due to easement cutouts
or non -asset generating reaches please clarify (see above comments).
RESPONSE: The differences are due to easement break exclusions. This is noted in the comments
column.
(8) see comment above in section 12 regarding wetland assets, rehabilitation criteria
M

RESPONSE: See the comment response to number (3) above.
FIGURES
Figure 11 Monitoring Plan
Stream gage / crest gage is indicated near lower end of Reach EF1. It is recommended that data to verify
reach hydrology be collected from the midpoint of the reach or above to yield a representative and
acceptable result.
RESPONSE: The crest gage on EF1 has been shifted to a riffle cross section upstream closer to the middle
of the reach.
There are no wetland gages in some of the wetland rehabilitation polygons. Please clarify.
RESPONSE: Wildlands revised the wetland restoration approach for the site and associated
determination of credits based on previous DMS comments above. Groundwater gages were placed
throughout the site at a rate of approximately one groundwater gage per acre of restored wetland.
Wildlands believes the groundwater gages proposed will provide an adequate overview of groundwater
hydrology for the site. Wildlands does not believe a groundwater gage is required in each polygon due
to the similarity in landscape position, soils, and hydrology between gaged and ungaged areas.
There is no hydrology verification/monitoring device on Meadow Branch. Please clarify.
RESPONSE: The restoration approach for Meadow Branch is Enhancement II, which does not require
hydrologic monitoring.
There are no cross sections in the plan for the main channel, Meadow Branch. While the assets are being
listed as E-11, it was noted during the 7/20/2016 meeting with the IRT that more significant bank repair
work than might be typical of an E-11 approach may be necessary on Meadow Branch. Please clarify the
lack of cross sections on Meadow Branch given the impaired condition and planned bank grading,
structures, and riffle -pool development described in the plan (Section 7.6).
RESPONSE: This comment was in the light that most Enhancement II typically involves cattle exclusion
and buffer planting. Since there are no cattle on this site, we believd that intermittant bank grading,
some bank revetment, and installation of isolated in -stream structures for habitat coincide with an
Enhancement II effort. The proposed improvements are localized and do not address reachwide
dimension, pattern, or profile.
Recommend that the map distinguish between planned crest gage locations and continuous stage
monitoring locations. If both types of data are planned for each location, please clarify in section 8.1.5.
RESPONSE: The figure has been revised to note it is a crest gage recording bankfull events only.
APPENDICES
Complete and add DMS Floodplain Requirements Checklist to Appendix
RESPONSE: A completed DMS Floodplain Requirements Checklist was added as Appendix 11.
0

Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
The 4/29/2015 Easement template is not the current version. Please use the most current easement
template (5/11/2017, available from DMS).
RESPONSE: The 5/11/2017 version of the Conservation Easement template is included in Appendix 1.
Appendix 4 Data, Analysis, Supplementary Information, Figures and Maps
Raw data sheets are provided for the GWGs, however hydrographs or a summary table are
recommended to show the results more clearly.
RESPONSE: Hydrographs for the existing groundwater gauges were added to Appendix 4.
Appendix 5 Categorical Exclusion
Figure 4 is upside down (in hard copy).
RESPONSE: Figure 4 will be inserted correctly in the distribution hard copies.
Appendix 7 Invasive Species Plan
Please clarify (or add) why some of the invasive wetland/aquatic vegetation observed in the ditched wet
areas of the site (e.g., Myriophyllum, Hygrophila) are not in this list.
RESPONSE: Neither of these species are listed in DMS Annual Monitoring Report guidance as species of
concern. References to both of these species were removed from the discussion of invasive species in
section 7.8.
Appendix 9 Credit Release Schedule
Credit Release Schedule for wetlands should indicate Forested Wetlands Credits.
RESPONSE: "Forested" was added to the wetland credit release schedule.
PLAN SHEETS
Sheet 0.2 (Symbols) — Brush toe symbol refers to the wrong sheet (5.2, not 5.4); symbol missing from
detail box.
RESPONSE: The brush toe reference and symbology were updated in the attached plan set.
10

PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN
DEEP MEADOW MITIGATION SITE
Union County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 6887
DMS ID No. 97131
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040105
USACE Action ID No. 2017-00241
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
WILDLANDS
E NGI N E ER I IVG
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
This mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory
mitigation.
Contributing Staff:
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM, Project Manager and Designer Eric Neuhaus, PE, Project Engineer
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge Ruby Davis, Existing Conditions Analysis
Ian Eckardt, PWS, Wetland Delineations Jesse Kelly, Construction Documents
Christine Blackwelder, Mitigation Plan Development Jeff Keaton, PE, Lead Quality Assurance

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0
Watershed Approach and Site Selection....................................................................................
1
3.0
Baseline and Existing Conditions...............................................................................................
2
3.1 Landscape Characteristics............................................................................................................
2
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover....................................................................................................................
3
3.3 Existing Vegetation.......................................................................................................................
3
3.4 Project Resources.........................................................................................................................
4
4.0
Functional Uplift Potential........................................................................................................6
4.1 Hydrology......................................................................................................................................6
4.2 Hydraulics.....................................................................................................................................
7
4.3 Channel Geomorphology..............................................................................................................
7
4.4 Physiochemical.............................................................................................................................7
4.5 Biology..........................................................................................................................................
8
4.6 Overall Functional Uplift Potential...............................................................................................8
4.7 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift.............................................................................................
9
5.0
Regulatory Considerations........................................................................................................
9
5.1 Biological and Cultural Resources.................................................................................................9
5.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass.............................................................
10
5.3 401/404......................................................................................................................................10
6.0
Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................
11
7.0
Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan............................................................................
12
7.1 Design Approach Overview........................................................................................................
12
7.2 Reference Streams......................................................................................................................
13
7.3 Design Channel Morphological Parameters...............................................................................
14
7.4 Design Discharge Analysis...........................................................................................................
16
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis......................................................................................................
17
7.6 Stream Restoration and Enhancement Implementation...........................................................
18
7.7 Proposed Wetland Design Overview..........................................................................................
20
7.8 Vegetation and Planting Plan.....................................................................................................
24
7.9 Project Risk and Uncertainties....................................................................................................
24
8.0
Performance Standards...........................................................................................................
24
8.1 Streams.......................................................................................................................................25
8.2 Vegetation..................................................................................................................................
26
8.3 Wetlands.....................................................................................................................................26
8.4 Visual Assessments.....................................................................................................................
26
9.0
Monitoring Plan......................................................................................................................
26
9.1 Monitoring Components............................................................................................................
27
10.0 Long -Term Management Plan.................................................................................................
28
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan....................................................................................................
29
12.0 Determination of Credits.........................................................................................................
29
13.0 References..............................................................................................................................
32
kv Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page i February 13, 2018

Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1.........................................................................................................1
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2.........................................................................................................
2
Table 3: Project Attribute Table Part 3.........................................................................................................4
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 4.........................................................................................................9
Table 5: Estimated Impacts to Aquatic Resources......................................................................................10
Table 6: Mitigation Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................11
Table 7: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters..........................................13
Table 8: Summary of Morphological Parameters for EF1...........................................................................14
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters for WF1.........................................................................
15
Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters for WF2.......................................................................
15
Table 11: Summary of Design Discharge Analysis.......................................................................................17
Table 12: Results of Competence Analysis.................................................................................................18
Table 13: Functional Impairments and Restoration Approach...................................................................
19
Table 14: Summary of Water Balance for Gage 2.......................................................................................23
Table15: Monitoring Plan...........................................................................................................................27
Table 16: Monitoring Components.............................................................................................................28
Table 17: Long-term Management Plan.....................................................................................................29
Table 18: Project Asset Table......................................................................................................................31
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Existing Watershed Map
Figure 4 Topographic Map
Figure 5 Soils Map
Figure 6 Existing Conditions Map
Figure 7 FEMA Floodplain Map
Figure 8 Concept Design Map
Figure 9 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Figure 10 Discharge Analysis
Figure 11 Monitoring Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
Appendix 2 Approved JD and supporting USACE Assessment Forms
Appendix 3 DWR Stream Identification Forms
Appendix 4 Data, Analysis, Supplementary Information, Figures and Maps
Appendix 5 Categorical Exclusion
Appendix 6 Plan Sheets
Appendix 7 Invasive Species Plan
Appendix 8 Maintenance Plan
Appendix 9 Credit Release Schedule
Appendix 10 Financial Assurance
Appendix 11 DMS Floodplain Requirements Checklist
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page ii February 13, 2018

1.0 Introduction
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Union County approximately two miles north of
Wingate, NC and approximately six miles northeast of Monroe, NC (Figure 1). The project is located
within the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) targeted watershed for the Yadkin River Basin
Hydrologic Unit (HU) 03040105070060 and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-07-14.
The Site was selected by DMS to provide stream mitigation units (SMUs) and buffer credits in the Yadkin
River Basin 03040105. The project involves the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of 4,298
existing linear feet of incised streams from Meadow Branch and three unnamed tributaries of Meadow
Branch. These unnamed tributaries have been given names by Wildlands to facilitate labeling and
communication in this mitigation plan and for the life of the project (Figure 2). These tributaries will be
hereafter referred to as West Fork 1 (WF1), West Fork 2 (WF2), and East Fork 1 (EF1). Restoration and
enhancement of these reaches will provide 2,838.9 SMUs. The project will produce 0.6 acres of wetland
rehabilitation which will provide 0.4 WMU's, and 8.2 acres of wetland re-establishment which will
provide 8.2 WMU's. The Site will be protected by a 23.80 -acre conservation easement. The Site
Protection Instrument detailing the easement is located in Appendix 1.
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1
Project Information
Project Name
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
County
Union
Project Area (acres)
23.80
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 1' 19.81"N 80° 27'5.34"W
Planted Acreage (acres of woody stems planted)
21.48
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection
The 2008 DWR Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Plan noted general habitat degradation in the Rocky River
watershed including sediment and erosion from construction and general agriculture in the upper
portions of the watershed as stressors resulting in habitat degradation. The 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) notes that the Lower Richardson Creek 03040105070060 HUC,
which contains the Site, is a newly designated TLW. The RBRP cites goals of improving management of
agriculture -related stressors and their sources and reducing levels of sediment, turbidity, and nutrients.
The Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin is also discussed in the
2005 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission's
(NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP). In the report,
stream impacts from excessive sedimentation and
changes in geomorphology related to agricultural
practices are discussed. The report also notes that
water quality in the watershed suffers due to excessive
nutrient loading in agricultural areas. The WAP
discussed the importance of stream restoration efforts,
and notes that the Richardson Creek watershed, which
the Site is located within, is a priority watershed for
freshwater conservation. Restoration of the Site will directly and indirectly address stressors identified
in the RBRP, the DWR Basinwide Plan and the NCWRC WAP by creating stable stream banks,
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 February 13, 2018

reconnecting incised streams to floodplains, restoring wetlands that will treat agricultural runoff, and
restoring a forest to agriculturally maintained buffer areas, which in areas will extend over twice the
width typically required for Piedmont streams. These actions will reduce nutrient and sediment inputs
to project streams, and ultimately to Richardson Creek and the Yadkin River.
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions
The Site watershed (Table 2 and Figure 3) is located in a southwestern HU of the Lower Yadkin CU. It is
situated in the rural countryside in Union County near Wingate, NC. The following sections describe the
existing conditions of the watershed and watershed processes, including disturbance and response.
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Slate Belt
River Basin
Yadkin River
USGS HUC (8 digit, 14 digit)
03040105, 03040105070060
NCDWR Sub -basin
03-07-14
Project Drainage Area (acres)
4,472
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
4.27%
CGIA Land Use Classification
24.4% forested, 50.4% cultivated, 4.3%impervious
3.1 Landscape Characteristics
3.1.1 Physiography and Topography
The Site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The Piedmont Province is
characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills with long low ridges and elevations ranging from 300-
1,500 feet above sea level. The Site topography and relief are typical for the region, as illustrated in
Figure 4. Meadow Branch has a gentle (0.22%) unconfined alluvial valley. EF1 transitions from a gentle
(1.00%) moderately confined valley at the upstream project limits to an unconfined valley as it
approaches Meadow Branch. Due to the valley shape present along Meadow Branch, a swath of
wetlands developed at the toe of the right valley slope and along an existing ditch off Meadow Branch
(Figure 2).
3.1.2 Geology and Soils
The Site is located in a portion of the Piedmont known as the Carolina Slate Belt (NCGS, 1985). The rocks
in this region are primarily volcanic and sedimentary rocks that underwent low-grade metamorphism
giving them a slaty cleavage. Coarse-grained intrusive granites comprise the rest of the Slate Belt rocks
(Rogers, 2006). Streams in the Carolina Slate Belt tend to go dry during late summer and early fall as a
result of geologic, topographic, and climatic factors. A study by Guise and Mason (1993) states that the,
"Carolina slate belt has among the lowest potential for sustaining baseflow in streams" throughout the
year as compared to other regions of North Carolina. Median low flows in the Carolina Slate Belt,
defined by the study as the 7Q10 (the annual minimum 7 -day consecutive low flow), can be as low as
0.005 ft3/s/mi2 (Guise and Mason, 1993). If streambank vegetation is not well established it can die back
in late summer when flows are low, leaving banks exposed to erosive storm flows. Low baseflow
appears to happen during the summer months and periods of drought along Meadow Branch, EF1, WF1,
and WF2.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 February 13, 2018

The Deep Meadow floodplain is dominated by Chewacla loams (Figure 5). While this soil frequently
floods and is poorly drained, aiding in the maintenance of wetlands, the loamy soil is greater than 80
inches deep. This depth to bedrock provides no natural grade control within the streambeds, making
degradation and incision likely. Once the incision process begins, degradation would likely continue in
the Site streams until the channels reach the underlying bedrock.
It is Wildlands' experience that small streams in the Slate Belt are low bedload sediment supply systems.
These streams commonly have small gravel and sand bed material that is derived from highly weathered
parent material. Largely forested watersheds with low rolling topography in this region will often result
in low sediment supply. Without naturally high bedload supply to drive morphologic change, these
streams are relatively slow to adjust without manipulation or watershed disturbance.
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover
Land use and land cover were investigated throughout the watershed by conducting a windshield survey
and by reviewing historical aerials of the Site and adjacent parcels from 1951-2012. Currently, the
watershed is 24% forested. The most common historical and current land uses in the watershed are
agriculture and urban development. A review of historic aerials shows that the Site has been in
agricultural production since 1951. In the 1951 aerial, the entire Site was cleared except Meadow
Branch's right floodplain upstream of the EF1 confluence and a small portion of Meadow Branch's left
floodplain just downstream of the WF2 confluence. The woods in the left floodplain were cleared
between 1951 and 1961, and the rest of Meadow Branch within the Site was cleared between 1961 and
1969. In the 1951 aerial, EF1 flows parallel to Meadow Branch for a distance before the two join. EF1's
flowpath is obscured in the 1961 aerial; however, by 1969, it appears that EF1 was pushed closer to
Meadow Branch to maximize a farm field north of EF1. EF1 stays in this configuration until the 2005
aerial where it is clearly shortened, eliminating the parallel flow path and instead joining Meadow
Branch at a perpendicular angle that we observe onsite today. These historic aerial photos are included
in the appendix.
This consistency in land use within the project watershed over the past 61 years indicates that
watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment supply, and nutrient and pollutant delivery have not
varied widely over time. The Union County 2025 Comprehensive Plan states that Wingate's future land
use objectives will consist of additional medium density residential development in the Site's watershed.
3.3 Existing Vegetation
Riparian buffers are largely absent from the Site streams and row crops exist right up to the top of
stream bank except for a narrow row of early successional woody species in some spots along Meadow
Branch. These woody species include green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), young boxelder (Acer
negundo), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) and black elderberry (Sambucus Canadensis). The
herbaceous ground cover throughout the row crops contains a variety of cool season broadleaf weeds
and grass such as creeping buttercup (Ranunculus sp.), Carolina geranium (Geranium carolinianum),
curly dock (Rumux crispus) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Warm season plants include goldenrod
(Solidago sp.), various smartweed (Polygonum spp) species, and two-headed water-starwort (Callitriche
heterophylla) in EF1. There is a single mature white oak (Quercus alba) on the interior bend of Meadow
Branch upstream of the ford crossing and a single mature willow oak (Quercus phellos) along EF1. A
small area of deciduous forest is present at the Meadow Branch/WF1 confluence, which contains a
variety of trees including sweet gum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) and
several oak species (Quercus spp.). Meadow Branch's floodplain is ditched as depicted on Figure 2, and
invasive aquatic plants such as parrots feather (Myriophyllum aquatiacum) and Indian hygrophila
(Hygrophila polysperma) are found in these ditches.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 3 February 13, 2018

3.4 Project Resources
Wildlands reviewed the project area for potential jurisdictional waters of the United States (US).
Jurisdictional areas were delineated using the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On -Site
Determination Method. This method is defined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual and the subsequent Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement. Potential
jurisdictional wetland areas as well as typical upland areas were classified using the USACE Wetland
Determination Data Form. Evaluation methods also utilized the North Carolina Department of Water
Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification Form. Jurisdictional waters of the US were surveyed for
inclusion on plans and figures.
The results of the on-site investigation include four jurisdictional stream channels (Meadow Branch,
WF1, WF2, and EF1) and two wetlands (A and B). USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms and the
approved jurisdictional determination (USACE Action ID No. 2017-00241; Date of JD: 05/23/2017) are in
Appendix 2 and NCDWR Stream Identification Forms are in Appendix 3. Table 3 provides a summary of
water resources within the project limits. Existing conditions are also illustrated in Figure 6. Reach
specific cross sections and geomorphic summaries are provided in Appendix 4.
Table 3: Project Attribute Table Part 3
Reach Summary Information
Parameter
Meadow Branch
WF1
WF2
EF1
Length of Reach (If)
2,570
136
391
1,201
Valley Confinement (confined,
Unconfined
Unconfined
Unconfined
Moderately
moderately confined, unconfined)
confined
Drainage Area (acres)
4,472
58
131
226
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
P
P
P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C
C4/5 (no proposed
Incised and
Incised and
Stream Classification (Existing and
change in stream
G4 (proposed
straightened
straightened E4
Proposed)
classification)
B4)
E4(proposed
(proposed C4)
C4)
Evolutionary Trend (Simon)'
VI: Quasi
III: Degrading
IV: Degrading
III: Degrading
Equilibrium
and Widening
FEMA Classification
Zone AE
Wetland Summary Information
Parameter
A
B
Size of Wetland (acres)'
0.30
0.28
Wetland Type (non riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine)
Riparian Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Tatum/ Chewacla
Chewacla
Well Drained/
Drainage Class
Poorly Drained
Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
No / Yes
Yes
Source of Hydrology
Groundwater and over bank events
Restoration or enhancement method
Re-establishment (hydrologic, vegetative)
(hydrologic, vegetative, etc)
1. The Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1994) is for natural streams. These channels have been heavily manipulated by
agricultural operations and therefore may not fit the classification category as described by these models. Results of the
classification are provided as a basis for discussion of existing channel form.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 4 February 13, 2018

Meadow Branch
Meadow Branch originates approximately 2.6 miles
upstream of the Site near the Wingate University
campus. In the section upstream of the existing ford
crossing, the stream runs along the left valley wall and
is influenced by several beaver dams, debris jams, and
depositional bars. The channel makes a couple of
meanders turns before reaching the ford crossing.
The left bank just upstream of the ford crossing is up
against the valley wall and is actively eroding in
several locations. The valley slope upstream of the
ford crossing is approximately 0.35%. Immediately
downstream of the ford crossing, the channel width
drastically narrows from an average of 20 ft to an
average of 9 ft. The right bank is nearly vertical and approximately 2.5 ft high. The left bank is lower and
flatter and ties into a floodplain bench where several parallel ditches have formed in the left floodplain.
These ditches can be attributed to more frequent inundation of the floodplain due to the smaller
channel cross sectional area in this section. Approximately 350 ft downstream of the ford crossing, the
channels widens back out to an average width of 28 ft. From this point to the downstream limits, the
channel is dominated by long, sluggish pools formed by several debris jams. The valley downstream of
the ford crossing is wide and flat with an average slope of 0.14%. Bed material is primarily coarse sand
and fine gravel based on visual assessment. Vegetation along Meadow Branch consists of a single row of
sporadic successional green ash boxelder, silky dogwood, and black elderberry, with the addition of a
few older hardwoods on the right floodplain upstream of the ford crossing. Buffer vegetation and
channel pattern has been kept to a minimum due to adjacent row crop operations.
WF1
WF1 originates outside of the conservation easement but on the Site property. It runs along a woodline
and joins Meadow Branch near the upstream project limits. The entire length of the project reach is
straight, dominated by privet on both banks with a few interspersed hardwoods. A headcut has
progressed approximately 100 LF upstream of the confluence to a bedrock knickpoint due to the lower
invert elevation of Meadow Branch. The bank height ratio downstream of the headcut is 4.0 and closer
to 1.0 upstream of the headcut. The channel bed consists primarily of large gravel and small cobble sized
material.
WF2
WF2 begins immediately downstream of an existing ford crossing outside of the conservation easement
and flows straight through a corn field from the west into Meadow Branch. No buffer exists along WF2
and several instances of farm machinery impact have been observed. This channel is maintained to drain
the adjacent agricultural fields. The valley is wide and flat with a slope of 1.08%. The channel bed is
dominated by fine gravel. There are a couple of minor headcuts. The reach is characterized by
inconsistent bank heights and slopes, most likely attributed to the farm machinery impact.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 5 February 13, 2018

EF1
EF1 enters the Site just downstream of an existing culvert crossing on McIntyre Road. For the first 125
LF, the valley is relatively confined with a slope of approximately 2.4%. The channel through this
upstream section is dominated by bedrock with no bedform diversity. After the first 125 LF, the valley
widens out and flattens to an average slope of 0.5%. The channel bed begins to form sporadic silty pools
and gravel riffles, with occasional bedrock outcroppings. The channel flows relatively straight along the
left edge of the valley, most likely relocated to this location to maximize agricultural production. Row
crops and open fields are maintained up to the top of
banks; no riparian buffer exists. An existing ford
crossing exists approximately 350 LF upstream of the
Meadow Branch confluence.
In the 1951 aerial, EF1 flows parallel to Meadow
Branch for a distance before the two join. EF1's flow
path is obscured in the 1961 aerial; however, by 1969,
it appears that EF1 was pushed closer to Meadow
Branch to maximize a farm field north of EF1. EF1
stays in this configuration until the 2005 aerial where
it is clearly shortened, eliminating the parallel flow
path and instead joining Meadow Branch at a
perpendicular angle that we observe onsite today.
Wetlands A — B
An on-site delineation of jurisdictional resources identified two areas of existing jurisdictional wetland
within the proposed conservation easement. Table 3 above outlines the specific details of the on-site
wetland resources including size, type, soils etc. Both wetland features are linear and appear to have
been altered previously based on their landscape position. Wetland A, located just south of the existing
farm road and ford crossing, has likely been deepened or maintained to facilitate drainage from the
adjacent agricultural field and adjacent farm road. Wetland B catches hill slope drainage from the
adjacent row crops and redirects this flow to Meadow Branch. The toe slope position of the wetland,
and the current shape, indicate that this wetland was dredged to drain the adjacent fields to better suit
them for row crops. Wetland A and B exhibited one or more of the following wetland hydrology
indicators: shallow inundation, drift deposits, algal mats, and/or saturation within the upper 12 inches of
the soil profile. Common hydrophytic vegetation within the wetlands included shallow sedge (Carex
lurida), rice cut grass (Leersia oryzoides), and parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum).
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential
The potential for functional uplift is described in this section according to the Stream Functions Pyramid
(Harman, 2012). The Stream Functions Pyramid describes a hierarchy of five stream functions, each of
which supports the functions above it on the pyramid (and sometimes reinforces those below it). The
five functions in order from bottom to top are hydrology, hydraulics, geomorphology, physicochemical,
and biology.
4.1 Hydrology
The major watershed disturbances have been deforestation, conversion of approximately 50% of the
watershed to agricultural land uses, and approximately 20% of the watershed to urbanization. These
alterations in land cover typically result in reductions in rainfall interception and evapotranspiration
which lead to increases in runoff and water yield (Dunne and Leopold, 1978). A primary result of these
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 6 February 13, 2018

changes is an increase in both peak flows and base flows. Initial increases in water yield usually change
over time as vegetation regrows and crops are planted. There are no stream gages within this watershed
and, thus, no way to know the degree to which clearing of the land affected this particular watershed
other than to say that water yields have almost certainly increased. However, these changes primarily
occurred several decades ago (prior to available aerial photography). Population growth in this
watershed is expected to grow in the future. Therefore, future alteration to the land cover and
associated effects on hydrology are expected. No measurements of existing hydrology have been made
to date for this project.
A stream restoration project performed at a specific Site does not often result in uplift to hydrology
(Harman, 2012). Even though buffer and wetland planting within the conservation easement will
provide a localized lift to the hydrologic function, this will not result in improvements to the rainfall -
runoff relationship at the watershed scale.
4.2 Hydraulics
The primary hydraulic stressors to Site streams are active scour on vertical stream banks, the lack of
stabilizing stream bank and riparian vegetation due to active row crop farming up to the top of the
stream bank, and incision on the tributaries. Bank height ratios on the tributaries range from 1.3 to 3.4.
Also, functioning streams in wide, flat valleys should have high entrenchment ratios. However, flood
flows for EF1 and WF1 are confined to the channel, as evidenced by entrenchment ratios ranging from
1.3 to 4.3. The estimated bankfull velocities on EF1, WF1, and WF2 range from 4.0 ft/s to 4.5 ft/s. EF1
and WF2 will be reconstructed and connected to their floodplains so that stream flows above bankfull
stage will flood the floodplain. The bank height ratios for both streams on the Site will be 1.0
(functioning). Bankfull flow velocities and shear stress will be improved to functioning levels and
groundwater exchange and adjacent wetland hydrology will also be improved as a result of the
increased frequency of floodplain inundation and higher water table elevations.
4.3 Channel Geomorphology
Channelization, incision, and on-going bank erosion place Meadow Branch in Stage VI, EF1 and WF1 in
Stage III, and WF2 in Stage IV of the Simon Channel Evolution Model. Meadow Branch exhibits active
scour erosion on at least one bank and often both banks along approximately 65% of its length. The
stream bedform is dominated by long sluggish pools of varying depth with infrequent, short riffles. The
pool to pool spacing ratio along EF1 ranges from 5.3 to 9.4, and 5.6 along WF2. Bank migration and
lateral stability were not measured for this project due to its straightened status. Overall, the existing
geomorphologic function ranges from moderate in areas where bedform diversity has formed, to very
poor in the backwater section of Meadow Branch.
There is a significant opportunity to improve the geomorphologic function on the Site. Large woody
debris (LWD) will be added to the system through construction of instream structures and bank
revetments. Channel incision and bank erosion will be corrected. A riparian buffer will be planted,
resulting in improved long-term geomorphic function of Meadow Branch, EF1, WF1, and WF2.
4.4 Physiochemical
While no water quality monitoring has occurred on the Site, its streams flow to Richardson Creek
approximately 4 miles downstream. Richardson Creek is 303(d) listed for exceeding the acceptable level
of copper for freshwater aquatic life. The 2008 DWR Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Plan noted general
habitat degradation in the Rocky River watershed including sediment and erosion from construction and
general agriculture in the upper portions of the watershed as stressors resulting in habitat degradation.
The 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) notes that the Lower
Richardson Creek 03040105070060 HUC, which contains the Site, is a newly designated TLW. The RBRP
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 7 February 13, 2018

cites goals of improving management of agriculture -related stressors and their sources and reducing
levels of sediment, turbidity, and nutrients.
There are numerous instances throughout the Site of streambank erosion, bed scour, absence of
riparian buffer, and concentrated runoff from agricultural fields. Each of these sources contribute to
higher levels of sediment, turbidity, and nutrient runoff.
There is potential to improve the physicochemical functioning of the project streams. Water will flow
over instream structures that will provide aeration, trees will be planted in the riparian zone to
eventually shade and cool stream flow and help filter runoff, the stream will be reconnected to its
floodplain and adjacent riparian wetlands to provide storage and treatment of overbank flows, and
streambank erosion will be greatly reduced to nearly eliminate the source of sediment and nutrients.
However, the potential improvements to physicochemical functioning will not happen immediately and
some aspects will not occur until a mature canopy is established. Therefore, physicochemical
improvements will not be included in the project success criteria for the seven-year monitoring period
and the functional uplift potential is not rated.
4.5 Biology
There are no available biological data for the Site, however, the habitat conditions on the Site are poor.
The channel substrate appears to be a bimodal distribution between small to medium gravels and fines.
A few debris jams are present on the streams, which provide good woody debris habitat, and there are
very few active depositional features in the channel to support diverse macroinvertebrate and fish
communities. While the riparian wetlands provide habitat diversity in the floodplain, they are regularly
cultivated for agriculture production, removing shade and refuge areas. The riparian zone of the project
provides little habitat for terrestrial species.
While the overall Site habitat is generally poor, potential habitat was identified along Meadow Branch
which may support the Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana) and the Savannah Lilliput (Toxolasma
pullus). These species are usually found in clay, silty -sand, and mixed sand gravel substrate within the
stream channel. There is opportunity to improve the instream and riparian habitat in addition to the
physicochemical function described in Section 4.4. Habitat will be improved by adding instream
structures with a variety of rock and woody materials, adding woody bank revetments, reducing the
abundance of nuisance macrophytes, providing a riparian buffer to shade the stream and improve
terrestrial habitat, creating pools of variable depths, and cutting of sources of fine sediments.
Establishment of riffles and pools will help develop point bars, which provide habitat for the dense
mussel beds of the Carolina creekshell and Savannah Lilliput. The culvert outlets will be addressed to
improve aquatic organism passage. The biological response of the system will be tied to the
physiochemical response post -restoration. As the physiochemical response may be delayed, the
ultimate level of improvement in biology may not occur until after the completion of the seven-year
monitoring period. Although the biological response of the project will not be explicitly monitored,
improvements in biologic activity of the Site will likely be noted during visual assessments of the project.
4.6 Overall Functional Uplift Potential
Overall, the Deep Meadow Site has great functional uplift potential, from the improvements in stream
hydraulics and habitat, to the improvements in wetland hydrology and vegetation establishment.
Physicochemical and biological improvements are a likely result of the project. However, there is no
existing basis for classifying the existing condition of these functions and the likely improvements will
occur gradually after construction.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 8 February 13, 2018

4.7 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift
There are no known Site constraints that will affect the functional uplift of the project. The valley width
on the Site will allow for the development of pattern and dimensions to restore stable, functioning
streams and wetlands. The degree to which the physicochemical and biology functions can improve on
the Site is limited by the watershed conditions beyond the project limits, upstream water quality, and
the presence of source communities upstream and downstream of the Site.
5.0 Regulatory Considerations
Table 4, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site. These considerations are
expanded upon in Sections 5.1-5.3.
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 4
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
PCN'
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
PCN'
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix 5
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Appendix 5
Coastal Zone Management Act
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
No
N/Az
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
1. PCN to be provided to IRT with Final Mitigation Plan.
2. A floodplain development permit application will be submitted to the local floodplain administrator.
5.1 Biological and Cultural Resources
A Categorical Exclusion for the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site was submitted to DMS on October 20,
2016, and approved on December 1, 2016. This document included investigation into the presence of
threatened and endangered species on Site protected under The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
well as any historical resources protected under The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The
biological conclusion for the Site, according to the Categorical Exclusion research and response by US
Fish and Wildlife Service, is that based on the assessment conducted by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. on
February 29, 2016 and August 10, 2016, it was determined that the proposed project will have "no
effect" on the federally listed endangered or threatened species; therefore "we consider the
requirements under the Act to be complete and require no further action at this time." Each request
made in the USFWS response letter will be addressed during construction and planting activities. Natural
channel design methodologies will be used to develop parameters, work will be done in the dry unless
absolutely unavoidable, the site will be stabilized at the end of each day, a riparian buffer will be
planted, and invasives will be treated before, during and after construction. All correspondence with
USFWS and a list of Threatened and Endangered Species in Union County, NC is included in Appendix 5.
The conclusion for cultural resources according to the Categorical Exclusion research and response by
the State Historic Preservation Office is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by
this project. For additional information and regulatory communications please refer to the Categorical
Exclusion document in Appendix 5.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 9 February 13, 2018

5.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
The Site is represented on the Union County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 5466, with an Effective
date of 10/16/2008. The Site is located within a Zone AE Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) regulatory
floodplain associated with Meadow Branch and EF1. WF1 and WF2 are not mapped under the
regulatory authority of FEMA. Current Effective FEMA mapping for the Site is overlain with project
streams on Figure 7. The Effective hydraulic model for Meadow Branch has been obtained from the NC
Floodplain Mapping Program. The stream, wetland, and floodplain grading within the regulatory
floodplain of Meadow Branch and EF1 will be designed to achieve a no -rise condition and a floodplain
development permit will be obtained from the Union County floodplain administrator.
Hydraulic trespass is not a concern with the proposed Site design. The proposed Enhancement II design
on Meadow Branch includes primarily bank stabilization with minor channel bed modifications
consisting of removing multiple beaver dams. A decrease in upstream flooding elevations is possible.
The valley slope of EF1 coming out of the existing road culvert will be kept relatively steep (0.9%), so the
risk of backwater into the culvert is negligible. WF1 and WF2 originate on-site and carry no risk of
hydraulic trespass.
5.3 401/404
As discussed in Section 3.4, the results of the on-site delineation of jurisdictional waters of the US
indicates four jurisdictional channels including Meadow Branch and three unnamed tributaries within
the proposed project area. In addition, two jurisdictional wetlands areas (Wetland A and B) were
delineated within the proposed project area, totaling 0.58 acres. Table 3 summarizes existing project
waters. The USACE issued a preliminary jurisdictional determination May 25, 2017 (SAW -2017-00241),
included in Appendix 2.
Impacts to jurisdictional stream and wetlands will be necessary for restoration and enhancement
activities but his project will result in an uplift of aquatic resources that have been historically impacted
by agricultural practices. Wildlands evaluated existing stream stability and functionality to develop
appropriate levels of intervention. Project streams with less instability and partial stream functionality
(Meadow Branch and WF1) are proposed for stream enhancement which will involve bank stabilization
and the installation of in -stream structures. Project streams with greater instability and less functionality
(EF1 and WF2) are proposed for restoration which will involve the construction of new stream channels.
Existing wetlands (A and B) are ditched swales installed to improve field drainage for row crops. Routine
maintenance has left the wetlands devoid of woody vegetation. Impacts to existing wetlands will include
floodplain grading (Wetland A) and structure installation (Wetland B) for wetland re-establishment
which is expected to result in a net gain in wetland area. Table 5 estimates the anticipated impacts to
existing streams and wetland on this project.
Table 5: Estimated Impacts to Aquatic Resources
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 10 February 13, 2018
Existing
Permanent (P)
Impact
Temporary (T) Impact
Jurisdictional
Feature
Classification
Length
Acreage
Type of
Impacts
Type of
Impacts
(LF)
(AC)
Activity
(LF/AC)
Activity
(LF/AC)
Meadow
Enhancement
Branch
Perennial
2,570
(E2)
2,410
EF1
Perennial
40
Bank
40
Stabilization
EF1
Perennial
1,161
Restoration
1,161
WF1
Perennial
136
Enhancement
136
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 10 February 13, 2018

6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The project will improve stream and wetland functions as described in Section 4 through stream
restoration, stream enhancement, wetland re-establishment, wetland rehabilitation, and riparian buffer
re -vegetation. Project goals are desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement
and/or visual assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The
project will be monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 9 of this
report. The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 6.
Table 6: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Existing
Permanent (P)
Impact
Temporary (T) Impact
Jurisdictional
maintain a stable pattern and profile
considering the hydrologic and
Feature
Classification
Length
Acreage
Type of
Impacts
Type of
Impacts
Reduce shear stress on channel
Geomorphology,
(LF)
(AC)
Activity
(LF/AC)
Activity
(LF/AC)
WF2
Perennial
391
channels. Add bank revetments and
Restoration
391
in -stream structures to protect
restored streams.
(P1 & P2)
Raise water table and hydrate
Reconnect
Reconstruct stream channels with
Log sill
channels with
appropriate banktdimensions and
frequent flood flows to disperse
historic floodplains
depth relative to the floodplain.
h
installation for
Hydraulic,
and re-establish
Restore stream plan form on East
Wetland A
Geomorphology,
wetland hydrology
0.28
depression storage for overland
< 0.01
and function in
development of mutually beneficial
flow retention. Decrease direct
Biology
relic wetland
stream/wetland complex.
wetland re -
areas.
Support all stream functions
Riparian
Riverine
establishment
Floodplain
grading for
Wetland B
0.30
0.30
wetland re-
establishment
1,592 LF
Total P Impact
and 0.3
Total T Impact
2,546 LF
AC
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The project will improve stream and wetland functions as described in Section 4 through stream
restoration, stream enhancement, wetland re-establishment, wetland rehabilitation, and riparian buffer
re -vegetation. Project goals are desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement
and/or visual assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The
project will be monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 9 of this
report. The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 6.
Table 6: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Function
Supported
Restore stream channels that will
maintain a stable pattern and profile
considering the hydrologic and
Significantly reduce sediment
sediment inputs to the system, the
inputs from bank erosion.
Hydraulic,
Improve stream
landscape setting, and the
Reduce shear stress on channel
Geomorphology,
channel stability.
watershed conditions. Create stable
boundary. Support all stream
Physicochemical,
tie-ins for tributaries joining restored
functions above hydrology.
Biology
channels. Add bank revetments and
in -stream structures to protect
restored streams.
Raise water table and hydrate
Reconnect
Reconstruct stream channels with
riparian wetlands. Allow more
channels with
appropriate banktdimensions and
frequent flood flows to disperse
historic floodplains
depth relative to the floodplain.
h
on the floodplain and create
Hydraulic,
and re-establish
Restore stream plan form on East
overbank floodplain and
Geomorphology,
wetland hydrology
Fork 1 and West Fork 2 to promote
depression storage for overland
Physicochemical,
and function in
development of mutually beneficial
flow retention. Decrease direct
Biology
relic wetland
stream/wetland complex.
runoff, increase infiltration.
areas.
Support all stream functions
above hydrology.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 11 February 13, 2018

Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Function
Supported
Increase and diversify available
habitats for macroinvertebrates,
fish, and amphibians, including
Carolina creekshell (Villosa
Install habitat features such as
vaughaniana) and the Savannah
constructed riffles, cover logs, and
Lilliput (Toxolasma pullus).
Improve instream
brush toes into restored/enhanced
Promote aquatic species
Geomorphology,
habitat.
streams. Add woody materials to
migration and recolonization
Biology
channel beds. Construct pools of
from refugia, leading to
varying depth.
colonization and increase in
biodiversity over time. Add
complexity including large
woody debris (LWD) to the
streams.
Reduce sediment inputs from
bank erosion and runoff.
Increase nutrient cycling and
Hydrology
Restore and
Plant native tree and understory
storage in floodplain. Provide
(local),
enhance native
species in riparian zone and
riparian and wetland habitat. r
Hydraulic,
floodplain and
wetlands where currently
Add a source of LWD and
Geomorphology,
wetland
insufficient.
organic material to stream.
physicochemical,
vegetation.
Excavate, spray, and treat
Biology
invasive species within the
stream corridor. Support all
stream functions.
Permanently
Protect Site from encroachment
Hydraulic,
protect the project
Establish a conservation easement
on the riparian corridor and
Geomorphic,
site from harmful
on the Site.
direct impact to streams and
Physicochemical,
uses.
wetlands. Support all stream
Biology
functions.
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
7.1 Design Approach Overview
The design approach for this Site was developed to meet the goals and objectives described in Section 6
which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 4. The design is also
intended to provide the expected outcomes in Section 6, though these are not tied to performance
criteria. The project tributaries to Meadow Branch will be reconnected with an active floodplain and the
channels will be reconstructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile that will transport the water
and sediment delivered to the system. Meadow Branch will be enhanced through bank stabilization and
in -stream structure placement. Riparian wetlands will be re-established and rehabilitated throughout
the broad floodplain of Meadow Branch. The stream banks, floodplains, wetlands, and valley walls
within the conservation easement will be planted with native tree species. Instream structures will be
constructed in the channels to help maintain stable channel morphology and improve aquatic habitat.
The entire project area will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement.
The stream restoration design for this Site utilized a combination of analog and analytical approaches,
and also relied on empirical data and prior experiences and observations. Reference streams and
wetlands were identified to serve as the basis for design parameters. Channels were sized based on
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 12 February 13, 2018

design discharge hydrologic analysis. Designs were then verified and/or modified based on a sediment
transport analysis. Wetland hydrology was assessed with groundwater gages and modeled to predict
hydrologic outcomes based on the proposed post -project conditions. These design approaches have
been used on many successful Piedmont restoration projects and is appropriate for the goals and
objectives for this Site.
7.2 Reference Streams
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds. Seven reference
reaches were identified for this Site and used to support the design of EF1 and WF2 (Figure 9). These
reference reaches were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage area,
valley slope, morphology, and bed material. Geomorphic parameters for these reference reaches are
summarized located in Appendix 4. The references to be used for the specific streams are shown in
Table 7. A description of each reference reach is included below.
Table 7: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters
7.2.1 Foust Upstream Reference
The Foust Creek reference reach is located approximately 600 feet upstream of the northernmost
conservation easement boundary on the Foust Creek Mitigation Site in Alamance County, NC. It was
identified by Wildlands in the Foust Creek Mitigation Site 2014 Mitigation Plan (Wildlands Engineering,
2014). Foust Creek has a gravel bed and a valley slope of 0.75%. The Foust Creek reference reach is
classified as a Rosgen C4 stream type. This reach flows through a mature forest and although it is stable
it lacks sinuosity. It was used in this project to inform the cross-section and profile parameters.
7.2.2 Long Branch
Long Branch is located in Orange County, northwest of Chapel Hill. Long Branch was previously identified
as a reference and discussed in the Collins Creek Restoration Plan (KCI Technologies, 2007). The Long
Branch watershed is low-density residential, agricultural, and forested land. The valley slope is 0.6% and
channel slope is 0.4%. The stream maintains an entrenchment ratio above 2.5. Wildlands visited the
reference site to verify the data presented in the KCI report. Two riffles were surveyed during the site
visit. These riffles had a width to depth ratio of 9.4 and 8.0 with entrenchment ratios of 11.7 and 12.1,
respectively. The cross-sections surveyed are more typical of E stream types, however KCI identified the
stream as a C4 in their previous analysis. The stream likely varies between a C4 and E4.
7.2.3 UT to Cane Creek
The UT to Cane Creek reference is located in Northeastern Rutherford County. The dataset was used as
a reference stream for the Cane Creek Restoration prepared by Restoration Systems and Axiom
Environmental in 2007. The drainage area is 0.29 square miles and the land use within the drainage area
is a semi -mature forest. The UT to Cane Creek reference site was classified as a C4/E4 stream type with a
sinuosity of 1.4. The channel has a width to depth ratio ranging from 12.3 to 14.4 and an entrenchment
ratio greater than 2.5. The reach has a valley slope of 2.6% while the channel slope is 1.5%.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 13 February 13, 2018
Design Stream
East Fork 1
West Fork 1 West Fork 2
Reference Stream
Stream Type
E4
B4 E4
Foust Upstream Reference
C4
X
X
Long Branch
C4/E4
X
X
UT to Cane Creek
E4
X
X
Spencer Creek Reach 3
E4
X
X
UT to Rocky Creek
E4b
X
Pilot Mountain Trib
64
X
7.2.1 Foust Upstream Reference
The Foust Creek reference reach is located approximately 600 feet upstream of the northernmost
conservation easement boundary on the Foust Creek Mitigation Site in Alamance County, NC. It was
identified by Wildlands in the Foust Creek Mitigation Site 2014 Mitigation Plan (Wildlands Engineering,
2014). Foust Creek has a gravel bed and a valley slope of 0.75%. The Foust Creek reference reach is
classified as a Rosgen C4 stream type. This reach flows through a mature forest and although it is stable
it lacks sinuosity. It was used in this project to inform the cross-section and profile parameters.
7.2.2 Long Branch
Long Branch is located in Orange County, northwest of Chapel Hill. Long Branch was previously identified
as a reference and discussed in the Collins Creek Restoration Plan (KCI Technologies, 2007). The Long
Branch watershed is low-density residential, agricultural, and forested land. The valley slope is 0.6% and
channel slope is 0.4%. The stream maintains an entrenchment ratio above 2.5. Wildlands visited the
reference site to verify the data presented in the KCI report. Two riffles were surveyed during the site
visit. These riffles had a width to depth ratio of 9.4 and 8.0 with entrenchment ratios of 11.7 and 12.1,
respectively. The cross-sections surveyed are more typical of E stream types, however KCI identified the
stream as a C4 in their previous analysis. The stream likely varies between a C4 and E4.
7.2.3 UT to Cane Creek
The UT to Cane Creek reference is located in Northeastern Rutherford County. The dataset was used as
a reference stream for the Cane Creek Restoration prepared by Restoration Systems and Axiom
Environmental in 2007. The drainage area is 0.29 square miles and the land use within the drainage area
is a semi -mature forest. The UT to Cane Creek reference site was classified as a C4/E4 stream type with a
sinuosity of 1.4. The channel has a width to depth ratio ranging from 12.3 to 14.4 and an entrenchment
ratio greater than 2.5. The reach has a valley slope of 2.6% while the channel slope is 1.5%.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 13 February 13, 2018

7.2.4 Spencer Creek Reach 3
Spencer Creek Reach 3 is located in central Montgomery County within the Uwharrie National Forest.
This site was classified as an E4 stream type and has a drainage area of 0.37 square miles. This reach
flows through a mature forest and has an average valley slope of 2.7% and an average channel slope of
2.1%. The morphological parameters reported for the riffle cross-section include a width to depth ratio
from 7.9 to 9.3 and an entrenchment ratio of 1.7 to 4.3.
7.2.5 UT to Rocky Creek
The UT to Rocky Branch reference site is located in Central Montgomery County within the Uwharrie
National Forest. The stream was used as a reference stream in the Big Cedar Creek Restoration Plan by
Baker Engineering NY, Inc. (2007). The drainage area is 1.10 square miles and the land use within the
drainage area is a semi -mature forest. The UT to Rocky Creek Reference site was classified as an E4b
stream type with a low sinuosity (1.1). The channel has a width to depth ratio of 9.1 and an
entrenchment ratio of 6. The reach has a valley slope of 2.6% while the channel slope is 2.4%. The bed
material d50 for the reach is 22.6 mm. Due to the low sinuosity, no pattern data were collected.
7.2.6 Pilot Mountain Tributary
Pilot Mountain Tributary is a small, steep (3.8%) B4 stream channel in Surry County, NC. The stream
flows through the northern side of Pilot Mountain State Park, just upstream of Black Mountain Road.
The stream flows along the left valley wall, which is vegetated with rhododendron thickets, while the
right valley has a single line of mature hardwoods with a maintained overhead utility easement corridor
beyond. The stream is relatively straight as it flows through the 4.0% valley, and bedform is diverse with
steep riffles, boulder steps, and in-line pools formed near roots and in backwater areas between steps.
7.3 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Reference reaches were a primary source of information to develop the pattern and profile design
parameters for the streams. Ranges of pattern parameters were developed within the reference reach
parameter ranges with some exceptions based on best professional judgement and knowledge from
previous projects. For example, for meandering C designs, radius of curvature ratio is kept above 1.8 on
all reaches and meander width ratio is kept above a 2.4. Meandering designs have pool widths to be 1.2
to 1.5 times the width of riffles to provide adequate point bars and riffle pool transition zones.
Wildlands has found these minimum ratios to support stable geometry. Designer experience was used
for pool design as well. Pool depths were designed to be a minimum of 1.5 times deeper than riffles to
provide habitat variation. Cross-section parameters such as area, depth, and width were designed based
on the design discharge and stable bank slopes. In some cases, the width to depth ratio was increased
beyond reference parameters as dictated by prior project experience to provide stable bank slopes prior
to the development of a fully vegetated streambank. Key morphological parameters for the Site are
listed in Tables 8 —10 for restoration and enhancement I reaches. Complete morphological tables for
existing, reference, and proposed conditions are in Appendix 4.
Table 8: Summary of Morphological Parameters for EF1
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 14 February 13, 2018
EF1
Parameter
Foust
Long
UT to
Spencer
Existing
Upstream
Cane
Creek
Proposed
Branch
Reference
Creek
Reach 3
Valley Width (ft)
60
NA
NA
NA
NA
60
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres)
226
896
954
186
237
226
Channel/Reach Classification
E4
C4
C4/E4
E4
E4
E4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
8.2
19.0
16.7
11.9
7.8
10.2
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 14 February 13, 2018

Parameter
EF1
Existing
Foust
Upstream
Reference
Long
Branch
UT to
Cane
Creek
Spencer
Creek
Reach 3
Proposed
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.7
0.9
0.9
0.8
Design Discharge Area (ft')
8.4
24.0
34.6
10.6
7.7
8.7
Design Discharge Velocity
(ft/s)
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.8
5.3
3.4
Design Discharge (cfs)
30
95.2
124
40
35
30
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0101
0.009
0.004
0.015
0.019
0.0095
Sinuosity
1.04
NA
1.30
1.4
1.3
1.3
Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
15.0
11.0
13.4
8.6
12.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
NA
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
5.3
3.4
2.5
3.0
5.0
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters for WF1
Parameter
WF1
Existing
UT to Rocky Creek
Pilot Mtn Trib
Proposed
Valley Width (ft)
>100
NA
NA
>100
Contributing Drainage Area (acres)
58
672
173
58
Channel/Reach Classification
G4
E4b
B4
CO
Design Discharge Width (ft)
4.9
12.2
8.6
8.1
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.7
1.3
0.7
0.9
Design Discharge Area (ft')
3.2
16.3
6.0
4.4
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s)
4.1
5.5
5.3
3.3
Design Discharge (cfs)
10
85
32
10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0192
0.024
0.0378
0.016
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.05
1.0
Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
9.1
12.5
15
Bank Height Ratio
3.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
6.0
1.5
2.2
Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters for WF2
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 15 February 13, 2018
WF2
Parameter
Foust
Long
UT to
Spencer
Existing
Upstream
Cane
Creek
Proposed
Branch
Reference
Creek
Reach 3
Valley Width (ft)
110
NA
NA
NA
NA
110
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres)
131
896
954
186
237
131
Channel/Reach Classification
E4
C4
C4/E4
E4
E4
E4
Design Discharge Width (ft)
6.1
19.0
16.7
11.9
7.8
8.9
Design Discharge Depth (ft)
0.85
1.3
1.7
0.9
0.9
0.7
Design Discharge Area (ft2)
5.1
24.0
34.6
10.6
7.7
6.6
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 15 February 13, 2018

7.4 Design Discharge Analysis
Multiple methods were used to develop bankfull discharge estimates for each of the project restoration
reaches: the NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (Harman et al., 1999), NC Piedmont/Mountain Regional
Curve (Walker, unpublished), a Wildlands Regional Flood Frequency Analysis, a site-specific Reference
Reach Curve, and existing bankfull indicators using Manning's Equation. The resulting values were
compared and best professional judgment was used to determine the specific design discharge for each
restoration reach. Each data source is plotted on Figure 10 to show the relationship of the data to the
design discharge selections.
7.4.1 Published Regional Curve Data
Discharge was estimated using the published NC Rural Piedmont Curve (Harman et al., 1999) as well as
the updated curve for rural Piedmont and mountain streams, also known as the Walker Curve (Walker,
unpublished).
7.4.2 Wildlands Regional USGS Flood Frequency Analysis
Wildlands developed a regional flood frequency analysis tool that tailored the USGS 2009 publication
Magnitude and Frequency of Rural Floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006 to the
Piedmont of North Carolina and allowed for predictions of discharges with recurrence intervals less than
2 years. Of the 103 stations referenced in the publication, 23 were used in the development of the tool.
To fill gaps in data, five additional stations were added by Wildlands to represent streams with drainage
areas less than one square mile. The Hosking and Walls homogeneity test was performed in R° to
identify a selection of hydrologically similar gages based on homogeneity (Hosking and Walls, 1993).
The data from these 28 gage stations were used to develop flood frequency curves for the 1.2 -year and
1.5 -year recurrence interval discharges. These relationships can be used to estimate discharge of those
recurrence intervals for ungauged streams in the same hydrologic region, and were solved for each
project reach's discharge with the drainage area as the input.
7.4.3 Site Specific Reference Reach Curve
Seven reference reaches were identified for this project. Each reference reach was surveyed to develop
information for analyzing drainage area -discharge relationships as well as development of design
parameters. Stable cross-sectional dimensions and channel slopes were used to compute a bankfull
discharge with the Manning's equation for each reference reach. The resulting discharge values were
plotted with drainage area and compared the other discharge estimation methods.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 16 February 13, 2018
WF2
Parameter
Foust
Long
UT to
Spencer
Existing
Upstream
Cane
Creek
Proposed
Branch
Reference
Creek
Reach 3
Design Discharge Velocity
(ft/s)
4.5
4.0
4.0
3.8
5.3
3.2
Design Discharge (cfs)
20
95.2
124
40
35
20
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0168
0.009
0.004
0.015
0.019
0.0133
Sinuosity
1.0
NA
1.30
1.4
1.3
1.4
Width/Depth Ratio
7.5
15.0
11.0
13.4
8.6
12.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
NA
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
Entrenchment Ratio
12
5.3
3.4
2.5
3.0
6.0
7.4 Design Discharge Analysis
Multiple methods were used to develop bankfull discharge estimates for each of the project restoration
reaches: the NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (Harman et al., 1999), NC Piedmont/Mountain Regional
Curve (Walker, unpublished), a Wildlands Regional Flood Frequency Analysis, a site-specific Reference
Reach Curve, and existing bankfull indicators using Manning's Equation. The resulting values were
compared and best professional judgment was used to determine the specific design discharge for each
restoration reach. Each data source is plotted on Figure 10 to show the relationship of the data to the
design discharge selections.
7.4.1 Published Regional Curve Data
Discharge was estimated using the published NC Rural Piedmont Curve (Harman et al., 1999) as well as
the updated curve for rural Piedmont and mountain streams, also known as the Walker Curve (Walker,
unpublished).
7.4.2 Wildlands Regional USGS Flood Frequency Analysis
Wildlands developed a regional flood frequency analysis tool that tailored the USGS 2009 publication
Magnitude and Frequency of Rural Floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006 to the
Piedmont of North Carolina and allowed for predictions of discharges with recurrence intervals less than
2 years. Of the 103 stations referenced in the publication, 23 were used in the development of the tool.
To fill gaps in data, five additional stations were added by Wildlands to represent streams with drainage
areas less than one square mile. The Hosking and Walls homogeneity test was performed in R° to
identify a selection of hydrologically similar gages based on homogeneity (Hosking and Walls, 1993).
The data from these 28 gage stations were used to develop flood frequency curves for the 1.2 -year and
1.5 -year recurrence interval discharges. These relationships can be used to estimate discharge of those
recurrence intervals for ungauged streams in the same hydrologic region, and were solved for each
project reach's discharge with the drainage area as the input.
7.4.3 Site Specific Reference Reach Curve
Seven reference reaches were identified for this project. Each reference reach was surveyed to develop
information for analyzing drainage area -discharge relationships as well as development of design
parameters. Stable cross-sectional dimensions and channel slopes were used to compute a bankfull
discharge with the Manning's equation for each reference reach. The resulting discharge values were
plotted with drainage area and compared the other discharge estimation methods.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 16 February 13, 2018

7.4.4 Maximum Discharge (Manning's Equation)
A riffle cross-section was surveyed on each design reach on the Site. Due to the existing impairments
throughout Site streams, bankfull indicators were weak and not considered reliable for estimating a
bankfull discharge. Instead, Manning's equation was used to calculate a discharge associated with the
top of banks for all project streams. Stream slope was calculated from the surveyed channel slope, and
roughness was estimated using guidelines from Chow (1959). This corresponding discharge was plotted
on Figure 10 (Amax— Existing Site Streams) and considered as an upper limit for potential bankfull
discharge values throughout the Site.
7.4.5 Design Discharge Analysis Summary
A primary design goal of Deep Meadow is to reconnect streams with their natural valleys and to restore
riparian floodplain or wetland hydrology. EF1 and WF2 will be raised so that the bankfull profiles will
closely match the invert of the floodplain and the restored channels will flow down the middle of the
valleys. Because of the desire to achieve frequent floodplain interaction, design discharges were
selected close to the lower end of the range of values produced by the estimation methods. Table 11
gives a summary of the discharge analysis, while Figure 10 illustrates the design discharge data.
Table 11: Summary of Design Discharge Analysis
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
EF1 and WF2 will be restored with bankfull depth relative to the valley floor. Buffers will be converted
from agricultural fields to planted native woody tree and shrub species. The restored buffer will provide
filtration for overland flow from remaining upland agricultural fields. On WF1, in -stream structures will
protect the stream bed from further degradation while the banks will be graded to a stable slope. Bank
grading on Meadow Branch will also provide stability to eroding stream banks. Stream restoration
activities will address the primary sediment sources by protecting stream banks and reducing channel
shear stress. There was no evidence of sediment deposition and accumulation throughout these
reaches, indicating that aggradation within the reaches is not an issue. The watershed assessment
verified that bedload supply is not high enough to result in capacity limited stream channels. The only
major land disturbance noted within the watershed was the construction of the US 74 bypass
approximately 1.8 miles upstream. The focus of sediment transport analysis for design was to verify that
the designed channels will be stable over time and have the competence to pass the sediment that
continues to be delivered by the watershed.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 17 February 13, 2018
Meadow
Branch
EF1
WF1
WF2
DA (acres)
4472
226
58
131
DA(sq. mi.)
6.99
0.35
0.09
0.20
NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (cfs)
363
42
16
28
Alan Walker Curve (cfs)
256
25
8
16
Wildlands Regional USGS Flood
Frequency Analysis (cfs)
1.2 -year event
326
36
13
24
1.5 -year event
450
52
19
34
Site Specific Reference Reach Curve
333
39
15
26
Max Q from Manning's Eq. from XS survey (cfs)
1 270
97
126
44
Selected Design Discharge
260
30
10
20
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
EF1 and WF2 will be restored with bankfull depth relative to the valley floor. Buffers will be converted
from agricultural fields to planted native woody tree and shrub species. The restored buffer will provide
filtration for overland flow from remaining upland agricultural fields. On WF1, in -stream structures will
protect the stream bed from further degradation while the banks will be graded to a stable slope. Bank
grading on Meadow Branch will also provide stability to eroding stream banks. Stream restoration
activities will address the primary sediment sources by protecting stream banks and reducing channel
shear stress. There was no evidence of sediment deposition and accumulation throughout these
reaches, indicating that aggradation within the reaches is not an issue. The watershed assessment
verified that bedload supply is not high enough to result in capacity limited stream channels. The only
major land disturbance noted within the watershed was the construction of the US 74 bypass
approximately 1.8 miles upstream. The focus of sediment transport analysis for design was to verify that
the designed channels will be stable over time and have the competence to pass the sediment that
continues to be delivered by the watershed.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 17 February 13, 2018

7.5.1 Competence Analysis
Competence analyses were performed during design for each of the restoration reaches by comparing
shear stress associated with the design bankfull discharge, proposed channel dimensions, and proposed
channel slopes with the size distribution of the existing bed load. The analysis utilized standard
equations based on a methodology using the Shields (1936) curve and Andrews (1984) equation
described by Rosgen (2001). Channel slope and design dimensions were varied until the resulting design
verified that the stream reach could move the bed load supplied to the stream. The results of the
analysis are shown in Table 12.
Table 12: Results of Competence Analysis
The results of the analysis in the table above indicates excess shear stress in each restoration reach.
These results were used to develop the designed riffles. Rock and wood step structures were added to
the designs to provide grade control and increase roughness within the channel. Riffles with larger
materials, such as chunky riffles, were also integrated into the design as grade control. The proposed D50
and Dim for the constructed riffles on both stream reaches has been sized so that the reconstructed
channels will not produce enough shear stress to entrain the largest particles in these structures. This
will ensure a stable pavement while allowing for bed load material to be active within the system.
7.6 Stream Restoration and Enhancement Implementation
The primary stressors to streams on the Site are bank erosion, incision on the tributaries, the lack of
riparian buffer, agricultural impact, and the lack of bedform diversity. Wildlands' focus is to restore the
stream corridor through stream and wetland restoration, stream enhancement, and establishment of
riparian buffers (Table 13).
Meadow Branch will be treated with an Ell approach. Bank erosion along Meadow Branch will be
addressed through bank grading and bank stabilization structures. Stable bank sections will be
preserved to avoid unnecessary disturbance. Riffles and pools will be added to the channel to enhance
habitat. Concentrated runoff ditches will be plugged or stabilized to reduce sedimentation inputs into
the stream system. A 70 -ft easement break will be implemented to allow for landowner access to the
western agricultural fields.
EF1 will be raised through Priority 1 restoration and moved away from the hillside slope to the center of
the valley. While Priority 1 restoration can be achieved at the upstream culvert outlet, a short section of
Priority 2 restoration is necessary at the downstream section to tie it to Meadow Branch. Bedform
diversity and habitat uplift will be achieved though riffle -pool sequences and woody cover structures.
Landowner access will be provided with a 40 -ft easement break near the downstream end of the reach.
WF1 will be improved through and EI approach. Bed and bank stability on WF1 will be achieved by
installing in -stream grade control structures and grading the banks. Invasive plants will be removed from
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 18 February 13, 2018
EF 1
WF 2
Dbkf (ft)
0.8
0.7
Schan (ft/ft)
0.0095
0.0133
Bankfull Shear Stress, t (Ib/sq ft)
0.49
0.59
Dmax Bar/Subpavement (mm)
78.5
64.0
Dcrit (ft)
0.42
1.4
Scrit (ft/ft)
0.005
0.026
Movable particle size (mm)
90
103
Predicted Shear Stress to move Dmax
0.41
0.31
The results of the analysis in the table above indicates excess shear stress in each restoration reach.
These results were used to develop the designed riffles. Rock and wood step structures were added to
the designs to provide grade control and increase roughness within the channel. Riffles with larger
materials, such as chunky riffles, were also integrated into the design as grade control. The proposed D50
and Dim for the constructed riffles on both stream reaches has been sized so that the reconstructed
channels will not produce enough shear stress to entrain the largest particles in these structures. This
will ensure a stable pavement while allowing for bed load material to be active within the system.
7.6 Stream Restoration and Enhancement Implementation
The primary stressors to streams on the Site are bank erosion, incision on the tributaries, the lack of
riparian buffer, agricultural impact, and the lack of bedform diversity. Wildlands' focus is to restore the
stream corridor through stream and wetland restoration, stream enhancement, and establishment of
riparian buffers (Table 13).
Meadow Branch will be treated with an Ell approach. Bank erosion along Meadow Branch will be
addressed through bank grading and bank stabilization structures. Stable bank sections will be
preserved to avoid unnecessary disturbance. Riffles and pools will be added to the channel to enhance
habitat. Concentrated runoff ditches will be plugged or stabilized to reduce sedimentation inputs into
the stream system. A 70 -ft easement break will be implemented to allow for landowner access to the
western agricultural fields.
EF1 will be raised through Priority 1 restoration and moved away from the hillside slope to the center of
the valley. While Priority 1 restoration can be achieved at the upstream culvert outlet, a short section of
Priority 2 restoration is necessary at the downstream section to tie it to Meadow Branch. Bedform
diversity and habitat uplift will be achieved though riffle -pool sequences and woody cover structures.
Landowner access will be provided with a 40 -ft easement break near the downstream end of the reach.
WF1 will be improved through and EI approach. Bed and bank stability on WF1 will be achieved by
installing in -stream grade control structures and grading the banks. Invasive plants will be removed from
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 18 February 13, 2018

the stream banks as part of the grading process. The bed elevation adjustments will tie in to an existing
bedrock knickpoint at the upstream end of WF1 to achieve a more uniform profile.
Priority 1 restoration will be performed on WF2 beginning at the very upstream project limits. A short
length of WF2 at the downstream end is designed to be incised as it drops to meet the invert Meadow
Branch. Step height of drop structures in this section will be limited to no more than 0.5' to allow for
aquatic species from Meadow Branch to navigate into the newly restored design reach. Riffle -pool
sequences will be installed along with woody cover structures to provide bedform diversity and habitat.
The Site is connected to wooded parcels upstream and downstream. Once a riparian buffer is
established on-site, a variety of wildlife species will likely migrate to the newly forested area.
In -stream structures will include various types of constructed riffles, log sills, boulder sills, lunker logs,
and j -hooks. The structures will reinforce channel stability and serve as habitat features. The
constructed riffles will be comprised of harvested on-site riffle material where possible, or quarry stone
may be used if an on-site source cannot be found. The riffles will incorporate woody brush material and
logs. The diverse range of constructed riffle types will provide grade control, diversity of habitat, and will
create varied flow vectors. Log -j-hooks will deflect flow vectors away from banks while adding to
habitat diversity. Log sills will be used to allow for small grade drops across pools. At select outer
meander bends, the channel banks will be constructed with brush toe revetments to reduce erosion
potential, encourage pool maintenance, and provide varied pool habitat.
The primary stressors to the wetlands on the Site are the lack of wetland vegetation, agricultural impact
including ditching to drawdown the water table, and the lack of hydrologic connection to the floodplain
tributaries and hillside seeps. The stressors will be mitigated by reconnecting the floodplain tributaries
with the wetland areas through restoration, filling agricultural ditches to raise the groundwater table,
reconnecting hydrology from upgradient hillsides, and revegetating wetlands with native vegetation to
increase roughness and provide microtopography (Table 13).
The concept plan for Site restoration is illustrated in Figure 8.
Table 13: Functional Impairments and Restoration Approach
Resource
Functional Impairments
Restoration Approach
Meadow
Erosion, lack of riparian vegetation, lack of habitat
Enhancement II
Branch
EF1
Incision, erosion, lack of riparian vegetation, lack of habitat
Restoration — Priority I
WF1
Incision, erosion, lack of habitat
Enhancement I
WF2
Incision, erosion, lack of riparian vegetation, lack of habitat
Restoration — Priority I
Agricultural activities including ditching and a lack of wetland
WH -1
Restoration -Rehabilitation
vegetation
Agricultural activities including ditching and a lack of wetland
WH -2
Restoration - Rehabilitation
vegetation
Hydrologic disconnection due to agricultural ditching, lack of wetland
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -1
vegetation
Hydrologic disconnection from adjacent floodplain tributaries,
WE -2
agricultural activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Restoration — Re-establishment
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, agricultural
WE -3
activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Restoration — Re-establishment
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, agricultural
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -4
activities, lack of wetland vegetation
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 19 February 13, 2018

Resource
Functional Impairments
Restoration Approach
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, agricultural
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -5
activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, agricultural
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -6
activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, agricultural
WE -7
activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Restoration — Re-establishment
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, adjacent floodplain
WE -8
tributaries, agricultural activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Restoration — Re-establishment
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, adjacent floodplain
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -9
tributaries, agricultural activities, lack of wetland vegetation
Hydrologic disconnection from upgradient slopes, adjacent floodplain
Restoration — Re-establishment
WE -10
tributaries, agricultural activities, lack of wetland vegetation
7.7 Proposed Wetland Design Overview
The proposed design includes the restoration of 8.8 acres (8.2 acres re-establishment and 0.6 acres
rehabilitation) of historically altered wetlands. Proposed wetland areas are currently being drained by a
series of ditches; preventing hydrology from the hillslope and adjacent stream hydrology from
establishing an adequate hydroperiod. Wildlands analyzed the proposed wetland areas to understand
farming and anthropogenic effects, current and proposed hydrologic conditions, and the potential for
hydric soil development.
7.7.1 Hydric Soil Investigation
After reviewing the National Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) web soil survey mapping and
performing site visits to evaluate potential for wetland restoration on-site, Wildlands contracted a
licensed soil scientist (LSS) to perform a detailed hydric soil evaluation of the site to determine the site's
potential for hydric soil development. Twenty-eight soil borings were performed throughout the study
area. Borings were located based on the existing topography, agricultural ditching, and initial estimates
of wetland potential. Each soil boring was classified based on soil characteristics indicating the hydric
soil status. Soils boring were placed into one of four general categories based on existing soils and site
characteristics including hydric, hydric over hydric, non -hydric over hydric, and non -hydric.
Borings classified as hydric met the NRCS F3 hydric soils field Indicator (depleted matrix) and exhibited
saturation, low chroma colors, and redoximorphic features. Borings rated hydric over hydric exhibited
NRCS F3 depleted matrix or F6 redox dark surface indicators, but exhibited obvious overburden material
ranging in depth across the site that generally also met either the F3 or F6 indicator noted above. Non -
hydric over hydric borings exhibited overburden material over a hydric soil layer in which the
overburden material did not meet any hydric indicator. Non -hydric borings did not exhibit any
characteristics of hydric soils indicators. The report from the LSS (Appendix 4) supported Wildlands'
initial impressions that the site has been heavily altered for use as an agricultural field. Obvious evidence
of soil manipulation was noted throughout the site. Areas where hydric, and hydric over hydric borings
were observed were considered the best areas for potential wetland restoration. Additionally, areas
with non -hydric over hydric borings were classified as potential wetland restoration if streams and seeps
were hydrologically reconnected and minor soil removal was performed to offset anthropogenic
modifications.
Based on the results from the LSS, existing groundwater gage data, and the existing hydrologic
alterations made to the site; zones of potential wetland restoration were developed. Areas not currently
jurisdictionally delineated where floodplain tributaries had been hydrologically disconnected, hillslope
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 20 February 13, 2018

seeps had been ditched, and/or swales had been used to re-route surface water towards Meadow
Branch where classified as wetland re-establishment. Areas which currently jurisdictionally delineated
but exhibited anthropogenic impacts through agriculture and hydrologic disconnection through ditching
were classified as wetland rehabilitation.
7.7.2 Reference Wetland
A reference wetland was identified approximately 1.3 miles upstream of the Site in the left floodplain of
Meadow Branch near the Monroe Ansonville Rd crossing (Figure 3). This area most resembles a
Piedmont Bottomland Forest (Typic low subtype) defined by Schafale (2012). The reference area is
within a mature forest and does not appear to have been ditched or manipulated in recent history. The
vegetation at the reference site will be used as a basis to develop the planting plan for the wetland
restoration on the project site.
The system is located at the toe of an adjacent hillslope and the hydrology of the system is seasonally
flooded. Hydrology sources include hillside seeps from the adjacent upgradient slope as well as
intermittent out of bank events from Meadow Branch. Consistent with the project area, NRCS web soil
survey mapping classifies the soils within the reference wetland area as Chewacla loams. A centrally
located groundwater monitoring gage was installed within the reference wetland on May 4, 2017 to get
a representative sample of the wetland hydrology and associated hydroperiod. The soil profile observed
during installation indicated saturated silt loam soils with low chroma color soil surfaces and
redoximorphic features within 12 -inches of the soil surface indicative of hydric soils. Reference well
observations were recorded during the growing season from May 4, 2017 to October 23, 2017. During
the monitored period, 43 days of groundwater within 12 inches of the soil surface were observed and
the longest period of consecutive inundation lasted 19.5 days or 8.6% of the defined growing season.
Reference gage data and an associated hydrograph are provided in Appendix 4. Observations from the
reference groundwater gage were considered when setting performance criteria for the proposed
wetland restoration and will be used to provide comparison for re-established and rehabilitated wetland
hydrology throughout the monitored period.
7.7.3 Groundwater Modeling
To further inform the wetland restoration design, an analysis of the existing and proposed conditions for
groundwater hydrology was performed using DrainMod (version 6.1). Existing and proposed
groundwater hydrology conditions were simulated as water table depth over time. DrainMod was
selected for this application because it is a well-documented modeling tool for assessing wetland
hydrology (NCSU, 2010) and is commonly used in wetland restoration projects.
A representative groundwater gage model was developed and calibrated to evaluate the existing and
proposed conditions within a potential wetland restoration zone that exhibited common functional
impairments seen throughout the site. The locations and raw data from the pre -project monitoring wells
are shown in Figure 6 and Appendix 4, respectively. Model output was used to validate the wetland
restoration plan and estimate a basic water budget for the site.
DrainMod models are built using site hydrology, soil, and climate data. Temperature and precipitation
data were obtained from nearby weather stations Monroe 2.4N (Station USINCUN0001) and Monroe,
NC (Station USC00315771) operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Weather Service. The Monroe 2.4N and Monroe weather stations are located approximately
5.8 and 6.0 miles away from the proposed mitigation site, respectively. Observed hydrograph peaks
align with the precipitation data, indicating that the precipitation trends are consistent between the
weather station and the mitigation site. These data were used to calibrate the model and perform the
long-term simulation.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 21 February 13, 2018

The existing calibration and proposed models were developed using the conventional drainage option
with the hydrologic analysis of wetlands feature incorporated to best simulate the drainage of the site.
The analyzed gage was installed in June of 2016 and recorded groundwater depth twice per day with In-
situ Level TROLL' pressure transducers. The entire recorded period is shown within the calibration plot
provided in Appendix 4, but due to drought conditions, the calibration period prior to October 2016 was
not considered as heavily during model calibration.
A baseline soil input file was developed using published soil survey data collected for the mapped soils
found on-site (NRCS, 2017). The soil file was refined by adjusting certain parameters for the mapped
soils using in-situ soil profiles and characterizations. To calibrate the model, soil parameters not
measured in the field were adjusted within the limits typically encountered under similar soil and
geomorphic conditions. After calibration of the model was complete, the calibrated model was used as
the basis for the proposed conditions model. Plots showing the calibration result are included in
Appendix 4.
Trends in the observed data are consistent with the results of the calibration simulations. Hydrograph
peaks between plots are not identical, but groundwater drawdown rates, and general overall water
table trends are well represented by the calibrated model. The calibrated model underestimates water
levels during the winter and early spring, but periods within the growing season are consistent with
observed groundwater data.
The proposed conditions model was developed based on the calibrated existing conditions model to
predict whether wetland criteria would be met over a long period of historical climate data after site
conditions have been modified. Proposed plans for the site include realigning floodplain tributaries and
raising the stream bed inverts. As noted previously, Meadow Branch will not be re -aligned. However,
minor grading is proposed within the wetland zones which will removed overburden material, restore
natural topography variations to the site, and shallow the overall dimension of Meadow Branch which
will improve stream and floodplain connection. The proposed minor grading will decrease the surface
elevation of the existing site to bring hydric soils within the top 12 inches of the soil. Cut depth is limited
to approximately 10 inches or less throughout the site. The proposed wetland areas will be disked and
planted with native wetland plants. Additionally, ditches and swales which now carry upgradient
hydrology directly to Meadow Branch will either be filled or smoothed during grading to hydrologically
reconnect hillslope seeps to proposed wetland areas.
Settings for the proposed conditions model were altered to reflect the proposed design changes of the
site. Based on existing groundwater gage data, and site observations, Meadow Branch is currently
hydrologically controlling the majority of groundwater on the site. As such, ditch spacing and dimensions
within the existing and proposed models were set to reflect the parameters of Meadow Branch and not
of the adjacent ditches and tributaries. In the proposed conditions model down slope seepage was
added to account for the filling of the toe of slope ditches and the resulting hydrologic change. Ditch
spacing values were not edited between the existing and proposed models. Proposed grading was
modeled by reducing the depth from the soil surface to the draining channel for the modeled well.
Surface storage values were increased to account for proposed roughening and planting of herbaceous
native wetland vegetation on site. Once the proposed conditions model was developed, the model was
run for a 70 -year period from January 1947 through December 2016 using temperature and
precipitation data from the Monroe, NC weather station.
The calibrated existing conditions model was compared with the proposed conditions scenario to
determine the effect of proposed practices on local site hydrology. Model simulations were then
analyzed to predict the success of the groundwater hydrology function on the site. The wetland
performance standard evaluated is that the water table must be within 12 inches of the ground surface
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 22 February 13, 2018

for a minimum of 8.8% (20 consecutive days) of the growing season (March 23 through November 6).
Sources used to set the wetland performance standard for the site include discussions with the IRT and
LSS, Table 1(wetland saturation threshold values) within the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update dated October 24, 2016, and reference well data from an upstream
floodplain wetland adjacent to Meadow Branch. Growing season dates were defined by the Monroe,
North Carolina WETS table for SO% probability of soil temperatures greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit.
The model run simulations indicate that the modeled groundwater gage (GWG2, Figure 6), would not
meet the required wetland performance standard with the site in its current condition any of the 70
modeled years. Average periods of inundation for the site without any changes sustain for
approximately 4 to 13 days. Once proposed design changes were incorporated into the model, 60 out of
the 70 modeled years meet the wetland performance standard with periods of inundation lasting
anywhere from 20 to 60 days depending on precipitation patterns.
DrainMod computes daily water balance information and outputs summaries that describe the loss
pathways for rainfall over the model simulation period. Table 14 below summarizes the average annual
amount of rainfall, infiltration, runoff, evapotranspiration, and sum of drainage and hillslope seepage
estimated for the modeled location onsite. Infiltration represents the amount of water that percolates
into the soil. The sum of drainage and seepage represents the difference between water entering the
site from hillslope seepage and the amount of water that is infiltrated water through the soil profile and
is discharged to the drainage ditches or streams. Runoff is water that flows overland and reaches the
drainage ditches before infiltration. Evapotranspiration is water that is lost by the direct evaporation of
water from the soil or through the transpiration of plants. The water balance results provided in the
table show evapotranspiration increasing in the proposed condition when compared to the existing
condition due to more standing surface water available to evaporation. Runoff remains virtually the
same, as initial abstraction rates are changed minimally. The sum of drainage and seepage is reduced by
approximately 18 cm of depth across the site by filling the onsite toe ditches which reconnects the
hillslope seeps to the floodplain. Because little changes are being made to stream dimensions, the
results show that seepage from the adjacent hillslope will increase by approximately 18 cm annually as a
result of plugging the toe of slope ditches which direct water out of the current agricultural fields and
directly into Meadow Branch.
Table 14: Summary of Water Balance for Gage 2
Hydrologic Parameter
Existing Conditions
Proposed Conditions
Average Annual
Amount
(cm of water)
Average Annual
Amount
(% of precip)
Average Annual
Amount
(cm of water)
Average Annual
Amount
(% of precip)
Precipitation
116
100%
116
100%
Infiltration
109
94%
110
95%
Evapotranspiration
71
61%
90
76%
Seepage + Drainage
38
33%
20
17%
Runoff
7.2
6%
6.3
5%
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 23 February 13, 2018

The model results and water budget, in concurrence with the hydric soils investigation, support that the
proposed design changes to the Site will restore wetland hydrologic processes required for hydric soil
development.
7.8 Vegetation and Planting Plan
The objective of the planting plan is to establish, over time, a thriving riparian buffer composed of native
tree species. The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearby reference community and will be
developed to restore appropriate strata (canopy, understory, shrub, and herbaceous layers). Based on
initial observation of the Site, the Piedmont Bottomland Forest (Typic low subtype) defined by Schafale
(2012) is the appropriate target community. The canopy will be restored through planting of bare root
trees such as oaks (Quercus sp.) and hickory (Carya sp.) stems. The understory and shrub layers will be
restored through a combination of planting bare root, low growth species and installing live stake shrub
species. The herbaceous layer will be restored by seeding the disturbed area with a native seed mix with
an emphasis placed on created good soil contact to encourage germination. Species chosen for the
planting plan are listed on Sheet 4.1 of the Draft Plans located in Appendix 6. The Draft Plans also
contain additional guidance on planting zones, Site preparation, and Site stabilization during
construction.
As mentioned earlier, the presence of invasive species on the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is found
within the forested area around the confluence of Meadow Branch and WF1. Chinese privet (Lagustrum
sinese) and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) are found mainly in the forested area, but are located in
small quantities along stream banks.
A goal of this project is to treat and remove as much existing invasive species as possible before and
during construction. The extent of invasive species coverage will be monitored, mapped, and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period. Please refer to Appendix 7 for the invasive
species plan. Post construction, the presence and extents of invasive species will be monitored.
Treatment of invasive species will continue as necessary throughout the life of the project to ensure
project stability and success of the riparian and streambank vegetation.
7.9 Project Risk and Uncertainties
This project is low risk. The land use surrounding the project is currently in agricultural row crop
production, so there is no potential for accidental livestock access. There are two breaks in the
easement for agricultural crossings; one on Meadow Branch and one on East Fork 1. These crossings will
be constructed with adequate approach stone to minimize disturbance adjacent to the stream. There is
slight risk that predicted changes in watershed land use would alter the hydrology, but reconnecting the
channels to their floodplains will help alleviate this new flow regime.
8.0 Performance Standards
The stream and wetland performance standards for the project will follow approved performance
standards presented in the DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (October
2015) and the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued April 2003 by the USACE and DWR. Annual
monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished project.
Specific performance standard components are proposed for stream morphology, hydrology, and
vegetation. Wetland rehabilitation and re-establishment areas will be assigned specific performance
criteria for wetland hydrology and vegetation. Performance standards will be evaluated throughout the
seven-year post -construction monitoring. If all performance standards have been successfully met and
two bankfull events have occurred during separate years, Wildlands may propose to terminate stream
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 24 February 13, 2018

and/or vegetation monitoring after monitoring year five pending little to no prevalent invasive species
issues are occurring. An outline of the performance criteria components follows.
8.1 Streams
8.1.1 Dimension
Riffle cross-sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. In order to meet the objective of constructing
stream channels that will maintain stable cross-sections, patterns, and profiles over time, bank height
ratios shall not exceed 1.2 and entrenchment ratios shall be at least 2.2 for restored channels. All riffle
cross-sections should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the designed stream type. If any
changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing
signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks.
Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a
decrease in the width -to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial
action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
8.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Visual assessments and photo documentation should indicate that streams are remaining stable and do
not indicate a trend toward vertical or lateral instability. Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted
during the as -built survey, but will not be conducted during the seven-year monitoring period unless
other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a
longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will follow standards as described in the Stream
Channel Reference Sites; An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique (Harrelson et.al., 1994) for the
necessary reaches.
8.1.3 Substrate
Substrate materials in the restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards the maintenance of
coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features. Successful substrate
measurements show that the restored stream meet the objective of maintaining stable banks through
reduced shear stress.
8.1.4 Photo Documentation
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis to
meet the objective of long-term stability. Cross-section photos looking upstream and downstream
should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal photos should
indicate the absence of persistent of mid -channel bars or vertical incision. Grade control structures
should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is preferable. Maintenance
of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
8.1.5 Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
with the seven-year monitoring period to meet the success criteria. Documentation of successful
bankfull flow events support the objective of reconstructing stream channels with appropriate bankfull
dimension and depth. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the form of two bankfull
events in separate years have been documented. These events will be documented using photographs
and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site conditions. The selected
measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle cross-section. The device will
be checked at each site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred. Photographs will also be used
to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment deposition.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 25 February 13, 2018

8.2 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria for the Site will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the
riparian corridor at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven). This will successfully meet
the objective of establishing native trees and understory species in the riparian and wetland zones. The
interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 native species
stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the
fifth year of monitoring
The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout
the required monitoring period.
8.3 Wetlands
The final performance criteria for the wetland hydrology will be a groundwater level within 12 inches of
the soil profile for a minimum of 8.8% (20 consecutive days) of the growing season (March 23 through
November 6).
8.4 Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.
9.0 Monitoring Plan
The Site monitoring plan has been developed to ensure that the required performance standards are
met, and project goals and objectives are achieved. Annual monitoring data will be reported using the
DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting Template (June 2017). The monitoring report shall provide project
data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, ease population of
DMS databases for analysis and research purposes, and assist in close-out decision making.
Using the DMS As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Template (February 2014), a baseline monitoring
document and as -built record drawings of the project will be developed within 60 days of the planting
completion and monitoring installation on the restored site. Monitoring reports will be prepared in the
fall of each monitoring year and submitted to DMS by December 1. These reports will be based on the
DMS Annual Monitoring Template (June 2017) and Closeout Report Template (March 2015). Closeout
monitoring period will be seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance
standards have been met.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees. The number of monitoring quadrants required and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
DMS monitoring guidance documents. Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall and will follow the
CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008) or another DMS approved protocol.
Groundwater monitoring gages will be established throughout the wetland rehabilitation and
reestablishment areas. Generally, the gages will be installed at appropriate locations so that the data
collected will provide an indication of groundwater levels throughout the wetland project area. Table
15, below, describes how the monitoring plan is set up in order to verify project goals and objectives
have been achieved.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 26 February 13, 2018

Table 15: Monitoring Plan
9.1 Monitoring Components
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Table 16. Approximate locations of the
proposed vegetation plots and groundwater gage monitoring components are illustrated in Figure 11.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 27 February 13, 2018
Performance
Monitoring
Likely Functional
Goal
Treatment
Standards
Metric
Outcome
Uplift
Reconnect
Two bankfull
Dispersion of high
channels with
Reconstruct stream
floodplains
channels with
events in
Crest gages
Multiple
flows on the
and riparian
designed bankfull
separate
and/or pressure
bankfull events
floodplain, increase
wetlands to
dimensions and
monitoring years
transducers to
within
in biogeochemical
during the
cycling within the
allow a
depth relative to
record flow
monitoring
natural
the existing
seven-year
elevations.
period.
system, and
flooding
floodplain.
monitoring
recharging of
period.
riparian wetlands.
regime.
Entrenchment
ratio stays over
Stable stream
Reduction in
Construct stream
2.2 and bank
channels with
sediment inputs
Improve
channels that will
height ratio
Cross-section
entrenchment
from bank erosion,
stability of
maintain stable
below 1.2 with
monitoring and
ratios over 2.2
reduction of shear
stream
cross-sections,
visual
visual
and bank
stress, and
channels.
patterns, and
assessments
inspections.
height ratios
improved overall
profiles over time.
showing
below 1.2.
hydraulic function.
progression
towards stability.
210 planted
stems per acre
One hundred
Reduction in
at MY7. Interim
Planted stem
floodplain
Restore and
survival rate of
square meter
densities will
sediment inputs
enhance
320 planted
vegetation
be at or above
from runoff,
Plant native tree
plots will be
native
shrub
stems per acre
o
placed 2/0 of
210 planted
increased bank
floodplain
at MY3 and 260
stems per acre
stability, increased
and herbaceous
and herbaceous
nt
the planted
and
at MY5. For
at MY7, with
biogeochemical
streambank
species.
buffer credit
area the
volunteer trees
cycling in
ct
project and
vegetation.
areas, survival
monitored
growing on Site
floodplain, and
rate of 260
as well.
improved riparian
annually.
stems per acre
habitat.
at MY5.
Visually inspect
the perimeter
No harmful
Protection of the
Permanently
Establish
Prevent
of the Site to
encroachment
Site from
protect the
conservation
easement
ensure no
into the
encroachment into
Site from
easements on the
harmful uses.
Site.
encroachment.
easement
conservation
the conservation
encroachment
easement.
easement.
is occurring.
9.1 Monitoring Components
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Table 16. Approximate locations of the
proposed vegetation plots and groundwater gage monitoring components are illustrated in Figure 11.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 27 February 13, 2018

Table 16: Monitoring Components
Notes:
1. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile will be collected during as -
built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate lack of stability and profile survey is warranted in
additional years.
2. A reach -wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach each year for classification purposes. A wetted
pebbled count will be performed during the baseline survey at surveyed riffles to characterize the pavement.
3. Crest gages and/or transducers will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually, evidence of bankfull events will be
documented with a photo when possible. Transducers will be set to record stage once every hour. Device will be inspected
and downloaded semi-annually.
4. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
5. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.
10.0 Long -Term Management Plan
The site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program (or 3rd party if approved). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder
and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the
responsible party on a yearly basis until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ
Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the non -reverting, interest-bearing
Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be
governed by North Carolina General Statute GS 113A -232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 28 February 13, 2018
Quantity/ Length by Reach
Monitoring
Meadow
Parameter
Wetlands
Frequency
Notes
Feature
Branch
EF1
WF1
WF2
Riffle Cross
n/a
2
1
1
n/a
Sections
Year 1, 2,
Dimension
Pool Cross
31 5, and 7
n/a
1
n/a
1
n/a
Section
Pattern
Pattern
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Year
Longitudinal
1
Profile
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Year 0
Profile
Year 1, 2,
Substrate
Reach wide
n/a
1 RW
1 RW
1 RW
n/a
2
3, 5, and
Stream
Crest Gage/
n/a
1
1
1
n/a
Quarterly
2
Hydrology
Transducer
Wetland
Groundwater
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
8
Quarterly
Hydrology
Gages
Year 1, 2,
Vegetation
CVS Level 2
16
3, 5,and 7
Exotic and
Semi -
nuisance
Annual
3
vegetation
spa
Project
Semi-
4
Boundary
Annual
Reference
Photographs
18
Annual
Photos
Notes:
1. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile will be collected during as -
built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate lack of stability and profile survey is warranted in
additional years.
2. A reach -wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach each year for classification purposes. A wetted
pebbled count will be performed during the baseline survey at surveyed riffles to characterize the pavement.
3. Crest gages and/or transducers will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually, evidence of bankfull events will be
documented with a photo when possible. Transducers will be set to record stage once every hour. Device will be inspected
and downloaded semi-annually.
4. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
5. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.
10.0 Long -Term Management Plan
The site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program (or 3rd party if approved). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder
and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the
responsible party on a yearly basis until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ
Stewardship Program is developing an endowment system within the non -reverting, interest-bearing
Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be
governed by North Carolina General Statute GS 113A -232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 28 February 13, 2018

may be used for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land
transaction costs, if applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to identify boundary markings as
needed. No livestock, fencing, or crossings are currently present or planned for the project area. Any
future livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility of the owner of
the underlying fee to maintain.
The Site Protection Instrument can be found in Appendix 1.
Table 17: Long-term Management Plan
Long -Term Management Activity
Long -Term Manager Responsibility
Landowner Responsibility
The landowner shall report
damaged or missing signs to the
long-term manager, as well as
Signage will be installed and
The long-term steward will be
contact the long-term manager if a
maintained along the Site
responsible for inspecting the Site
boundary needs to be marked, or
boundary to denote the area
boundary and for maintaining or
clarification is needed regarding a
protected by the recorded
replacing signage to ensure that the
boundary location. If land use
conservation easement area is clearly
changes in future and fencing is
conservation easement.
marked.
required to protect the easement,
the landowner is responsible for
installing fencing that meets the
objectives of the mitigation project.
The long-term manager will be
responsible for conducting annual
inspections and for undertaking
The Site will be protected in its
actions that are reasonably
The landowner shall contact the
entirety and managed under the
calculated to swiftly correct the
long-term manager if clarification is
terms outlined in the recorded
conditions constituting a breach. The
needed regarding the restrictions
USACE, and their authorized agents,
associated with the recorded
conservation easement.
shall have the right to enter and
conservation easement.
inspect the Site and to take actions
necessary to verify compliance with
the conservation easement.
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan
Upon completion of Site construction, Wildlands will implement the post -construction monitoring
defined in Sections 9 and 10. Project maintenance will be performed during the monitoring years to
address minor issues as necessary (Appendix 8). If, during annual monitoring it is determined the Site's
ability to achieve Site performance standards are jeopardized, Wildlands will notify the members of the
IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
12.0 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 18 are projections based upon the proposed design. Upon
completion of the as -built survey, the project components and credits data will be revised if necessary
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 29 February 13, 2018

with explanations of how and why any adjustments occurred. As -built stream linear footage will be
based on surveyed stream center lines for credit calculations.
Stream Restoration is requested at a ratio of 1:1. Enhancement I is requested at a ratio of 1.5:1.
Enhancement 11 is requested at a ratio of 2.5:1. All proposed buffers meet, and in most cases exceed, the
minimum 50 -foot requirement for Piedmont streams. Appendix 9 contains a credit release schedule.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 30 February 13, 2018

Table 18: Project Asset Table
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 31 February 13, 2018
Existing
Restored
Creditible
Wetland
Footage
Footage,
Footage,
Approach
Project
Position and
or
Acreage,
Acreage
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Mitigation
Component
HydroType
Acreage
Stationing
or SF
or SF
Level
Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Notes/Comments
Bank stabilization and in -stream structures with
Meadow
100+66-
planted buffer. Creditable length accounts for 96
Branch
2,570
126+11
2,545.0
2,449.0
Ell
2.5
979.6
LF of stream within an easement break.
Full channel restoration and planted buffer.
200+38-
Creditable length accounts for 41 LF of stream
EF1
1,201
214+01
1,363.0
1,322.0
R
P1, P2
1
1,322.0
within an easement break.
400+77-
Dimension and profile modified to provide
WF1
116
401+93
116.0
116.0
EI
1.5
77,3
stability.
400+57 -
WF1
20
400+77
20.0
20.0
P
10
2.0
301+29-
Full channel restoration and planted buffer.
WF2
391
305+87
458.0
458.0
R
P1, P2
1
458.0
Rehabilitation. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reducing
WH -1
RR
0.30
0.30
0.30
R
1.5
0.20
drainage to Meadow Branch.
Rehabilitation. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reducing
WH -2
RR
0.30
0.30
0.30
R
1.5
0.20
drainage to Meadow Branch.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reducing
drainage to Meadow Branch to increase area
WE -1
RR
0.40
0.40
0.40
R
1
0.40
around jurisdictionally delineated wetland.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reducing
WE -2
RR
1.70
1.70
1.70
R
1
1.70
restoring adjacent tributary (EF -1)
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by eliminating
WE -3
RR
0.40
0.40
0.40
R
1
0.40
adjacent drainage swales.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by eliminating
WE -4
RR
0.40
0.40
0.40
R
1
0.40
adjacent drainage swales.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by eliminating
WE -5
RR
0.40
0.40
0.40
R
1
0.40
adjacent drainage swales.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by eliminating
WE -6
RR
0.20
0.20
0.20
R
1
0.20
adjacent drainage swales.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by eliminating
adjacent drainage swales and increasing
WE -7
RR
1.50
1.50
1.50
R
1
1.50
connecting with upgradient hillslope hydrology
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reconnecting
area with upgradient slope drainage and
WE -8
RR
1.00
1.00
1.00
R
1
1.00
restoring adjacent tributary (WF -2)
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reconnecting
area with upgradient slope drainage and
WE -9
RR
0.50
0.50
0.50
R
1
0.50
reducing drainage to Meadow Branch.
Re-establishment. Planted, removed agricultural
activities, increased hydrology by reconnecting
area with upgradient slope drainage and
WE -10
RR
1.70
1.70
1.70
R
1
1.70
reducing drainage to Meadow Branch.
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 31 February 13, 2018

Leneth and Area Summations by Mitieation Cateeory
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
1,780
8.8
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
116
Enhancement 11
2,449
Creation
Preservation
20
High Quality Pres
13.0 References
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category Overall Credits
Stream 2,838.9
RP Wetland 8.60
NR Wetland -
Buffer -
Dunne, T. and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman and Company. New
York.
Giese, G.I and Robert R. Mason Jr. 1993. Low -Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2403.
Harman, W.A. and C.J. Jones. 2016. Functional Lift Quantification Tool for Stream Restoration Projects in
North Carolina: Data Collection and Analysis Manual. Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC.
Harman, W.A. and C.J. Jones. 2016. Functional Lift Quantification Tool for Stream Restoration Projects in
North Carolina: Spreadsheet User Manual Version 2. Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC.
Harman, W. R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Harman et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. AWRA
Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited by: D. S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy. AWRA Summer
Symposium. Bozeman, MT.
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resources
Management. 1996. Rapid Stream Assessment Technique (RSAT) Field Methods. Montgomery County,
Maryland.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2017. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale.
Compiled by Philip M. Brown at el. Raleigh, NC, NCGS.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Orange County, NC.
North Carolina State University (NCSU), 2010. DrainMod Related Publications.
http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/soil water/drainmod/drainmod papers.html#wetland
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 32 February 13, 2018

Rogers, John J.W., 2006. The Carolina Slate Belt. In Steponaitis, V.P., Irwin, J.D., McReynolds, T.E., and
Moore, C.R. (Ed.), Stone Quarries and Sourcing in the Carolina Slate Belt (pp. 10 —15). Retrieved from
http://rla.unc.edu/Publications/pdf/ResRep25/Ch2.pdf
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001.
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Shields, D. F., Copeland, R. R, Klingman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., and Simon, A. 2003. Design for Stream
Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(8): 575-582.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC), 2010. HEC -RAS River Analysis
System User's Manual, Version 4.1. Accessed online at:
http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documentation/HEC-RAS_4.1_ Users_Manual.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2010. Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant
Load, version 4.1. http://it.tetratech-ffx.com/steplweb/models$docs.htm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Orange County, NC.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/orange.html
Walker, Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 33 February 13, 2018

FIGURES

11nionviUe .
03040105070050
r�
03046105
70020
i
Por•
v n+
CO a`Polk MoVntain �i•�
d5or r,
w�ra F
OK.� Gol club /
FL` e . .�
0.
:y ;r
03040105070060 r�
Y`
firs.-rh Hv x � i
a. m
y /
r- 7 ti 03040105070010�
,�• is
•y �c
Mars
,.:' ��• Jesse Helms Park
Natural Area
- Project Site
Hydrologic Unit Code (14 digit)
Local Watershed Plan
0 NC Historic Preservation Areas
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas
Water Supply Watershed
303d Listed Streams
(� • µgY, F f+ 030401081040
^ '
Jesse Helms Park
Soccer Complex °;
03040105070040. fo Catawba Lands Conservancy
�.Oe, Br�p�h Easement
03040105081030
1 z
floc 0,- Focdo a,an,,,
��, S ��•• Lj aeke�_. 131 a'
03040105081020
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING
WI LI]LAND S o 1.5 Miles Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
I I I i I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

* d J• i f�
�r,. �.r•r• '. r. r.....r. r. r.r.r•r.�,.w. �. +�.
R
j Project Site
....: Conservation Easement
Project Streams
Non -Project Streams
Exiting Ditches
® Wetlands
ti
ON WILDLANDS 0 300 Feet
W ENGINEERING
I I I I
Figure 2 Site Map
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

ii
IVA
Conservation Easement
Watersheds
Meadow -Branch (4472 ac.)
EFI (226 ac.)
WFI (58 ac.)
WF2 (131 ac.)
Project Streams
Non -Project Streams
Reference GWG
Topographic Contours 5'
WC,
47�.17f OAF4
Mir, fi ,
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERINC, 0 1,500 Feet
I I I I I
I
NION,
Figure 3 Watershed Map
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

rr • 1 1 ��~
■
•� r + 1
550 S.
• � +y r
_._ �... -
j. � Project Site
- Conservation Easement = e;
atson, US;S 7.5 minute topographic quadran e
Figure 4 Topographic Map
W I LD LA N D S 0 1,000 Feet Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

�. r.i�• wrtw�.r. r• a•
f
i
ChA
h � }
Bd;2
ChA
:BdC2
�... .................
...... .... •• ................
•., —._ ......................
., .l
TbC2
ChA
j Project Site
Conservation Easement�„w. •�
- Non -Project Streams
Soils
BdC2 - Badin channery silty clay loam, 8-15% slopes
ChA - Chewacla silt loam, 0-2% slopes
TbC2 - Tatum gravelly silty clay loam, 8-15% slopes
Figure 5 Soils Map
N WILD LANDS Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 300 Feet
I I I I I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

.�_�.�.+•r•r'r�~•r •w.w.r.. .�.rr.w.r..w.w.r
r A
L•—• Project Site
• Conservation Easement
•.......
® Wetlands
Non -Project Streams
Project Streams
Exiting Ditches
Cross Sections (XS)
+ Barotroll(BT)
0 Groundwater Gage (GWG)
WO.* WI LDLAND 5
ENGINEERING
Sk
r:
t
F"
t.
Figure 6 Existing Conditions Map
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
0 300 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
1 1 1 1 I
Union County, NC

Figure 7 FEMA Map
WILD LANDS Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 300 Feet
I I I I I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

S , -fir:►,
.� L
.`.�' 1
k•
I �
f .
i +
i
i
' r
r
j Project Site 1
Conservation Easement r Y
Restoration 1
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11 j ;
Preservation k
Wetland Re-establishment k
Wetland Rehabilitation
1
Non -Project Streams
-ifffi 111
Figure 8 Concept Design Map
qWV WILD LAND 5 Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 300 Feet
I I I I I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

F I I A I J y?,_ ouri
r Airy
,. Eden
Maybdan R t'l.i.I r I GH A M
P41, - ` _ Pilot Mountain Trib rf a t',1 till'f [. E.
of • ; Jai Reidsville
Rural
'Hall - -- - - -- - y-
+ F Alt=aha'.v
IAPKIII I
533 a� _ 421 Yadkinville Kernersville GU I L V � R I) Morgantaa n Har Isnl
'SB -1n, 519, Q. - Winston-Salem
I Greensboro �'tbsorn'ille EIon River Mebane Fall I
I ' —
- - - .- .. _ r_ _ _ _ .- r t` 40 �C011etpe Slr•1• • f
Cfemmons Long Branch
- - , •
aft, n' High
Jarrr estawnDu1 f r,.0 r
Point /J Foust Upstream
[ t.iL 1 I. ; I fired - • ti chapel
� � Thoma �:IIIN
_ sb�Liberty _ _ Hill-
f HF. 1'I 1, 1. -'Lexington Randlem - - - - - - - - - - - - Morrisville
Statesvillet R3 m Ca
! :11'IrS�111 6 ItA1JT71}l-f'fa Siler !
Mont, a Spencer Asheboro city Pdlsboro r
H 0l At I UT Cane Creek 229 m 11 A 114 AM �
NOR T'H .286m Holl
Mooresville CAR ❑LINASprin
enc & ;.. Landis Ina Grove 4P m' 253m
- _
7..- il(annapoks --------- '-- -- -- r --- ~��;Q�'t� .` y
_3Spencer Creek f•1: t
1 HunlersviIle Foiw•td
Paw Harrisburg ti 1 A IJI.) UT to Rocky Creek i _ H AR 11 rTT
ill Creek Newell AI r.� ! ! 144 m
Locust ,
nt ' • -
Charlotte I Pinehurst SouthernSp�ng '
Pine, Lake
-
- Aberdeen ' Fort Bragg 29
A$$ f-
F'u,c•ilRe 205 rra PinebluiF Miltary
Reservation
Indian
- Trail - -�,� i Fayetteville
1 i �*K r.
Fart Ltarshville fi 11! Alar•![} Cumberland
Mill, U 11 f ��N 11I wt,I 1 Raelord
1
I :, axhav R ockingh am
l H amlel,
Red _Z_
Springs Saint
Pageland Laurinburg ' Pauls ,
Lancaster 11' „!
Nlaxl.arr R OF 1 S��r 1
A9cCvil Pembroke
CIIFSTFRFILL17 chem+
Sta°° �.� : � T{ Lumberton '
Sand Fh tl ;
Project Site State Forest
O Fairmont
Reference Reach l [ I I ! I
CIII�n
Figure 9 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
WILD LANDS 0 20 Miles P Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I rJr
IN Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

1000
100
10
Deep Meadow Design Discharge Plot
- 'Rural Piedmont Regional Curve
y = 89.039x°•7223
R2 = 0.9069
' Site Specific Reference Reach Curve
y = 82.56x0.7175
R2 = 0.9572
Rural and Urban Regional Curve
Alan Walker Curve
y = 55.699xo.7855
R2 = 0.9931
1
0.01 0.1 1 10
Drainage Area (square miles)
Rural Data - - - Rural Upper 95% Limit - - - Rural Lower 95% Limit
O Qmax - Existing Site Streams A RFF 1.2 -yr Predictions X Reference Reach Curve
• Alan Walker Curve ■ USGS 1.2 year ♦ Design Discharges
Power (Rural Data) Power (Reference Reach Curve) Power (Alan Walker Curve)
WILDLANDS
ON
ENGINEERING
Figure 10 Discharge Analysis
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County

Figure 11 Monitoring Plan Map
WILD LANDS Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 300 Feet
I I I I I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

APPENDIX 1
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT

Appendix 1 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 1. All parcels are optioned for purchase of a conservation
easement by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands), which will encompass streams and wetlands being
restored, enhanced, and preserved along with their corresponding riparian buffers.
The recorded options are included in this appendix.
Table 1: Site Protection Instrument — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Current Landowner
Baucom Farm and
Milling
PIN County Under Option
by Wildlands?
09009003 Union Yes
Memorandum of Option/
Conservation Easement
Deed Book (DB) and Page
Number (PG)
DB: 06631 PG: 0167-0173
Acreage to be
Protected
23.8
The conservation easement template that will be used for recordation is included in this appendix. All
site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the USACE and or DMS prior to any
action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by the
State.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 1
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
COUNTY
SPO File Number:
DMS Project Number:
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
this day of , 20, by Landowner name goes here
, ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is Landowner address toes here , to the State of
North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of
Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The
designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State
of North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 1 of 11

protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife
habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between ( insert name and
address of full delivery contract provider ) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality Purchase and Services Contract Number
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding, (MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU
recognized that the Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory
mitigation for authorized impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring,
enhancing and preserving the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem
Enhancement Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces
the previously effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State
to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 2 of 11

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Township, County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book at Page
of the County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the
areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and
purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights.
The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of if known
insert name of stream, branch, river or waterway here.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Tracts Number containing a total of acres as shown on the plats
of survey entitled "Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services, Project Name: , SPO File No. , EEP Site No. ,
Property of ," dated , 20_ by name of surveyor,
PLS Number and recorded in the County, North Carolina Register
of Deeds at Plat Book Pages
See attached "Exhibit A", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries,
aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the
Conservation Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to
prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
L DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 3 of 11

IL GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area
by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units,
derived from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong
to the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation
Easement Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey
plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such
purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations.
Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded
survey plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or
vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and
commercial uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 4 of 11

All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except
interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the
Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the
use of the Conservation Easement Area.
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement
Area is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel,
rock, peat, minerals, or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering
or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or
shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may
temporarily be withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the
Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 5 of 11

III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Conservation Easement Area
over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities on the property to restore,
construct, manage, maintain, enhance, protect, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other
riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities
or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation
Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the
investment and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which
would cause financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are
required to restrict livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so
may result in the State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences)
within the conservation area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the
landowner (Grantor) must provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or
features in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the
Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the
Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by
such breach. If the breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may
enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an
action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 6 of 11

power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Conservation Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation
Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages
from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the
immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other
appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the
benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights
and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all
other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at
reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying
with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from
any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 7 of 11

obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made.
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the
Property shall notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing
sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any
request to void or modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification
requests shall be addressed to:
Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 8 of 11

VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet
enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 9 of 11

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
(SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of , 20.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 10 of 11

Exhibit A
[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 5 May 2017
Page 11 of 11

APPENDIX 2
WETLAND JD FORMS

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-00241 County: Union U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Watson
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Baucom Farm & Milling
Kyle Herring
Address: 6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Telephone Number: 704.226.2818
E-mail: wkherrin09Ayahoo.com
Size (acres) 23.1 Nearest Town Wingate
Nearest Waterway Meadow Branch River Basin Yadkin
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.023275
Longitude: -80.451156
Location description: 1812 McIntyre Road northeast of Monroe and approximately 2.2 miles north of Wingate, Union County,
North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation plan sheets that were included with your JD
request package, dated 27 January 2017. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and
other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. If you
wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is
no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Jason Randolph at 704.510.1440 or
i ason.d.randolphAusace.army.mil.
C. Basis for Determination: see preliminary jurisdictional determination, dated 23 May 2017
D. Remarks: The attached preliminary jurisdictional determination that your consultant requested
should NOT be viewed as a "verification" of the presence/absence of potential wetlands or waters by this
office and should NOT be viewed as a verification of the accuracy of the extent of potential wetlands and
waters by this office. Only an approved iurisdictional determination can be used for those tasks.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 5/23/2017 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://coKpsmgpu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wildland Engineering
Ian Eckardt
Address: 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704.332.7754
E-mail: ieckardtAwildlandseng.com

Unionville
03040105070050
1
� r
► i`
t ♦
�•t `j
A
i 03040105070060
i�
03040105070020
r
i
030401050700701
i
r;
v
1Ningat� .� Marshyille �
e 03040169081040
� n°Rp --�f •r
S
03040105070040
03040105081030
1 �./
03040105081020
i
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
O WILD LANDS 0 1.5 Miles Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC
r
^ f •.•�
�- `Monroe
1
i
1
D3%40105070010
Project Parcel
Hydrologic Unit Code (14
digit)
Municipalities
r
i
030401050700701
i
r;
v
1Ningat� .� Marshyille �
e 03040169081040
� n°Rp --�f •r
S
03040105070040
03040105081030
1 �./
03040105081020
i
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
O WILD LANDS 0 1.5 Miles Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

a. }
01
-9
49
J 1 r
r� ;
Ik
550
1 1
Sewage✓ .+
' • Paiiid14
-�.
�•!J Project Parcel
Proposed Project Area
atson, UVAIS 7.5 minut to o ra hic'ran
Figure 2 Topographic Map
�., W I j .D LANDS Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
� � EtiG4NEERtNG I ' I 11,000 Feef Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

Project Parcel
. Figure 3 Site Map
W I LD LAN D S Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I 300 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

r
• r•7•
ChA
j �• j Project Parcel
Proposed Project Area
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
Soils
BdC2 - Badin channery silty clay loam, 8-15% slopes
ChA - Chewacia silt Loam , 0-2% slopes
- TbC2 - Tatum gravelly silty clay loam, 8-15% slopes
.. TI
WON WILDLANDS
ENGINEEIt1►JG
ChA
0 300 Feet
III II
Wetland A
I. rl�
a
I
!
I
I
i
!
BdC V
TbC2.
r �
i
i
i
t
r •
i -
i .
!
U
Figure 4 Soils Map
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL AL
Applicant: Baucom Farm & Milling, Kyle Herring File Number: SAW -2017-00241
I Date: 5/23/2017
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.gnM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoUProgramandPennits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT

REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Jason Randolph
CESAD-PDO
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M 15
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone]
704.510.1440
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Jason Randolph, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 5/23/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Baucom Farm & Milling, Kyle, Herring, 6510 Morgan
Mill Road, Monroe, NC, 28110
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Deep Meadow Mitigation Site, SAW -2017-
00241
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1812 McIntyre Road northeast of Monroe and
approximately 2.2 miles north of Wingate, Union County, North Carolina
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Union City: Wingate
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.023275 Longitude: -80.451156
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Meadow Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 23 May 2017
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Geographic authority
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
to which the aquatic
aquatic resources in
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
review area (acreage
resources (i.e.,
resource "may be"
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non-
subject (i.e., Section
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
1. Meadow
non -wetland
35.023473
-80.451173
2,608 LF
404
Branch
waters
2. East
non -wetland
35.022505
-80.449903
1,241 LF
404
Fork 1
waters
3. West
non -wetland
35.020858
-80451511
137 LF
404
Fork 1
waters
4. West
non -wetland
35.024268
-80.452312
398 LF
404
Fork 2
waters
5. Wetland
35.022021
-80.450718
0.30 acre
PSS wetland
404
A
6. Wetland
35.025860
-80.452388
0.28 acre
PEM wetland
404
B

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and
obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having
discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may
be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and
conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a
permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit
authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance
on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic
resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional,
and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or
enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the
applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable.
Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein),
or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,
during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination
whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide
an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there
"may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the
subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected
by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: JD request package, dated 27 January 2017, from Wildlands Engineering
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Dated 27 Oct 2016
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Watson Quad, Figure 2 in JD request package
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 4 in JD request package
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figures 3 & 4 (2015) in JD request package
or ®Other (Name & Date): Several on -the -ground photos in delineation package
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corns and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
23 May 2017
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of
staff member completing PJD person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PID forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP1- wetiandA
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.022021 Long: W -80.450718 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within a ditched field depression within an active row crop (corn). Small
saplings are present but no mature trees are present because the area is actively maintained.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 0-3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
DP1 - Wetland A
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5'
15
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Carex lurida
30
Yes OBL
—
2 Leersia oryzoides
30
Yes OBL
3 Myriophyllum aquaticum
10
No OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Vernonia noveboracensis
5
No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Polygonum pensylvanicum
5
No FACW
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
80
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6.
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 - Wetland A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-2
2.5Y 4/2
90
10YR 4/6 10 C
PL
silt loam
2-8
2.5Y 5/2
65
5YR 4/6 35 C
PL
silt loam
8-12
2.5Y 5/3
60
7.5YR 4/6 40 C
PL
silt loam
12-14
2.5Y 6/2
65
10YR 5/8 35 C
PL
silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1:
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.022015 Long: W -80.45051 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within an active row crop field (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is entirely planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Zea mays
90 Yes NI
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
90 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is entirely planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
loam
3-14 10YR 5/4 90
7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP3 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.022216 Long: W -80.450763 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within an active row crop field (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Zea mays
20 Yes NI
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
20 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation ✓
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/4 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
loam
4-14 10YR 5/4 80
5YR 4/6 20 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP4 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.022869 Long: W -80.450869 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within an active row crop field (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI). An
unknown fescue grass is also present but unable to identify.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
2.
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Zea mays
60 Yes NI
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Festuca sp.
20 Yes Unknown
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
80 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation ✓
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI). An
unknown fescue grass is also present but unable to identify.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/4
loam
8-14 10YR 5/4 90
7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP5 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.024392 Long: W -80.451494 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within an active row crop field (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI). The other
dominant herbaceous species is an unknown fescue that isn't identifiable.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
2.
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Zea mays
40 Yes NI
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Festuca sp.
25 Yes Unknown
3 Commelina communis
10 No FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
75 = Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI). The other
dominant herbaceous species is an unknown fescue that isn't identifiable.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/4
loam
5-14 2.5Y 6/3 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP6 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.023430 Long: W -80.451569 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within a small depression in an active row crop field (corn). The depression
isn't planted in corn.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The only vegetation present is crowsfoot grass (Dactyloctenium Willd.) that doesn't have an indicator
status (NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
2.
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Dactyloctenium Willd.
70 Yes NI
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
70 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The only vegetation present is crowsfoot grass (Dactyloctenium Willd.) that doesn't have an indicator
status (NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP6 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 6/3
loam
3-14 10YR 6/4 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP7-Wetland B
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.025860 Long: W -80.452388 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within a ditched field depression in an active row crop (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 0-14
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
DP7 - Wetland B
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1 Leersia oryzoides
15 Yes OBL
-
2 Polygonum pensylvanicum
10 Yes FACW
3 Myriophyllum aquaticum
10 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Sagittaria sp.
5 No OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
40 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6.
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
DP7 - Wetland B
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 4/2 silt loam
6-10 2.5Y 5/2
10-14 2.5Y 5/2
70 10YR 5/8
50 10YR 5/8
30 C PL silt loam
50 C PL silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP8 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.025717 Long: W -80.452222 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation `/ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point located within an active row crop field (corn).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
✓
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP8 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is entirely planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5�
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Zea mays
100 Yes NI
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
100 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is entirely planted in corn which doesn't have an indicator (No indicator, NI).
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP8 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/3 100 loam
11SiCIii 11I us i[11IH;
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 10/27/16
Applicant/Owner: Wildlands Engineering State: NC Sampling Point: DP9 -Upland
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: N 35.026538 Long: W -80.452565 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla silt loam (ChA) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes Noy
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Sampling point located on the northern edge of an active row crop field (corn). The sampling
location isn't farmed but is an edge area dominated by native saplings and herbaceous vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
✓
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP9 - Upland
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is dominated by herbaceous ground cover with a few saplings present. The
dominant herbaceous species is a goldenrod which can't be identified down to the species level to
assign a indicator status and is therefore give a NI status.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Yes FACW
FAC species x 3 =
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5'
10_
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Solidago sp.
40
Yes NI
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Leersia oryzoides
30
Yes OBL
3 Polygonum pensylvanicum
10
No FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Polygonum sagittatum
5
No OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Vernonia noveboracensis
5
No FACW
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
90
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
✓
6,
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The sampling location is dominated by herbaceous ground cover with a few saplings present. The
dominant herbaceous species is a goldenrod which can't be identified down to the species level to
assign a indicator status and is therefore give a NI status.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP9 - Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/3 95
7.5YR 5/6 5 C PL
loam
5-14 10YR 6/3 80
7.5YR 5/6 20 C PL
loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

APPENDIX 3
DWR STREAM IDENTIFICATION FORMS

Appendix 3 DWR Stream Identification Forms
The results of the DWR Stream Identification Forms are listed in the table below. DWR forms can be
found in this appendix and in the digital submission to DMS. DWR forms were completed by Wildlands
for all project streams.
Table 1: DWR Form Summary — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Geomorphology Hydrology Biology
Stream Total Score
Score Score Score
Meadow Branch
(SCP 1) 21 10 9.5 40.5
East Fork 1 (SCP2) 16 8.5 11 35.5
West Fork 2 (SCP 3)
West Fork 1 (SCP 4)
15
15
8.5 7.5
8.5 9.5
31
33
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 3
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

NU 1)WQ Stream Identification Yorm Version 4.11
Date: 3 � 6 Project/Site: du t' e. �: Latitude: 35. Oaaciq 'N
Evaluator: :1: IS County: �� ; Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination (ci one) Other Meadow Branch SCP 1
Stream is at least intermittent yp , S Ephemeral Intermittent Perenni e.g. Quad Name:
if _ 19 or perennial if = 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = oti` ) Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, 0
r
1
co
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0
1
2
1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits ¢,
8. Headcuts `_9
1
1
Z_
2
3
3
9. Grade control 0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley 0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdroloav tSubtotal = 10 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
2
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based eviderice of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = q.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
'-' o-
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.'5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.9�
Other =-O')
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
-
Notes:
Sketch:

NC D`VQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: . '�� 6
Project/Site: 94,40D (r$E.A �� V
Latitude:
Evaluator: y
--
County:
Longitude: - o �ISOa62 W
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3S '
Stream Determination (circ e)
Ephemeral IntermittenPerenni
Other East Fork 1 (SCP 2)
if 2 19 or perennial if;? 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0
1
2
0.5 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, 0
ripple -pool sequence
12
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
Yes = 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
1
2
0
5. Active/relict floodplain 0
1
1 )
3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0
1.5
2
3
8. Headcuts (^��
1
2
1
3
1.5
9. Grade control 0
10. Natural valley 0
G.Ai
0.5
1
1.5�
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = e.5' `_)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 5-
1
2
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
[ 0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
; 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = IL-) `-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 :a
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks I e�} h,.��l , t Cr v�y./ (t
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
6
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
6.5
1
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5(.31-
3
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site: blep P1 J,
Latitude: 35 O�ua6$°N
Longitude: -gQ
Evaluator: ���
County: (�
Total Points:
Stream is at intermittent
ttent 3 I
Stream Determination (circle e)
Other West Fork 2 - SCP3
erennleast
3
i(>_ 19 or erennial it >_ 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent rennfa
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
C-0)
1
2
3
8. _Headcuts
FACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
(.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
-, 0.5
1
(1.5_
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = R. '� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
�3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
pa
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5)
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
(0.5)
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Z 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0]
1
2
3
22. Fish
(10
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 (Other = 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.1.1
Date: - -9 - 1 �
Project/Site:
Latitude: 35, O1OLqi*N
Evaluator: _;
County: U n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent SS
Stream Determination (circle
Other West Fork 1 - SChPd4
at
Ephemeral tntermittent�Perennia
3�
if 19 or perennial if2 30"
0
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
1
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
3�
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
2
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
2
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1
0
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2)
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1
3
8. Headcuts
F-14
1
2
�-
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
( 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
( No= 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HvdroloQv (Subtotal = 0,5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteriaco-)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
J_�)
. 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5)
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0r0.5��
2
1
4 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
Yes = 3
C. Biolociv (Subtotal = 111.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
~3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
Cp
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
cbt
1
2
3
22. Fish
0(705-)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
O
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other= 0
�-
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

APPENDIX 4
DATA, ANALYSIS, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, FIGURES AND MAPS

Existing
Conditions Geomorphic Parameters
Meadow Branch
East Fork
Parameter
Notation
Units
min I max
min max
stream type
Cb
Straightened E4
drainage area
DA
sq mi
7
0.35
bankfull cross
Abkf
SF
76.1
90.7
9.1
10.7
sectional area
avg velocity
during bankfull
wbkf
fps
2.9
3.4
2.8
3.3
event
width at
wbkf
feet
52.4
66.7
7.6
9.7
bankfull
maximum depth
dmax
feet
4.1
5.1
1.6
at bankfull
mean depth at
dbkf
feet
1.4
1.5
1.1
1.2
bankfull
bankfull width
wbkf/dbkf
36.1
49.1
6.4
$.$
to depth ratio
low bank height
feet
4.1
5.1
1.8
2.2
bank height
BHR
1.0
1.1
1.4
ratio
floodprone area
Wfp,
feet
360.0
390.0
29.0
>39
width
entrenchment
ER
>6.0
3.8
>4.0
ratio
max pool depth
dp°°i
feet
N/A
2.2
at bankfull
pool depth ratio
dpool/dbkf
N/A
1.9
pool width at
wp°°l
feet
N/A
8.6
bankfull
pool width ratio
Wpool/wbkf
N/A
1.0
Bkf pool cross
Ap°°l
SF
N/A
13.3
sectional area
pool area ratio
Apool/Abkf
N/A
1.3
pool -pool pacing
p -p
feet
N/A
42
81
pool -pool
p p/Wbkf
N/A
4.9
9.3
spacing ratio
valley slope
Svalley
feet/foot
0.0023
0.0094
channel slope
Schannel
feet/foot
0.0022
0.0078
sinuosity
K
1.15
1.06
belt width
wblt
feet
N/A
N/A
meander width
Wblt/wbkf
N/A
N/A
ratio
meander length
Lm
feet
450.0
N/A
meander length
Lm/wbkf
7.6
N/A
ratio
linear
LW
302.0
N/A
wavelen th
linear
wavelength
LW/wbl,f
5.1
N/A
ratio
radius of
R,
feet
32.0
83.0
N/A
curvature
radius of
Rj wbi<f
0.5
1.4
N/A
curvature ratio
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 September 2017

Existing
Conditions Geomorphic Parameters
West Fork 1
West Fork 2
Parameter
Notation
Units
min I max
min max
stream type
G
E6
drainage area
DA
sq mi
0.09
0.20
bankfull cross-
Abkf
SF
4.7
5
5.2
sectional area
avg velocity
during bankfull
wbkf
fps
2.1
3.8
4
event
width at
wbkf
feet
5.1
5.5
6.7
bankfull
maximum depth
dmax
feet
1.1
1.1
at bankfull
mean depth at
dbkf
feet
0.9
0.8
0.9
bankfull
bankfull width
w d
bkf/ bkf
5.5
6.2
8.8
to depth ratio
low bank height
feet
2.6
1.4
1.6
bank height
BHR
2.5
1.3
1.5
ratio
floodprone area
Wfp,
feet
6.0
>82
width
entrenchment
ER
1.2
12.1
ratio
max pool depth
d p°°
feet
N/A
N/A
at bankfull
pool depth ratio
dpool/dbkf
N/A
N/A
pool width at
wp°°l
feet
N/A
N/A
bankfull
pool width ratio
Wpool/wbkf
N/A
N/A
Bkf pool cross-
Ap°°l
SF
N/A
N/A
sectional area
pool area ratio
Apool/Abkf
N/A
N/A
pool -pool pacing
p -p
feet
N/A
34
53
pool -pool
p p/Wbkf
N/A
5.6
8.6
spacing ratio
valley slope
Svalley
feet/foot
0.0166
0.0107
channel slope
Schanno
feet/foot
0.0278
0.0064
sinuosity
K
1.07
1.10
belt width
wblt
feet
N/A
N/A
meander width
Wblt/wbkf
N/A
N/A
ratio
meander length
Lm
feet
N/A
N/A
meander length
Lm/wbkf
N/A
N/A
ratio
linear
LW
N/A
N/A
wavelength
linear
wavelength
LW/wbkf
N/A
N/A
ratio
radius of
R
feet
N/A
N/A
curvature
radius of
Rj wbkf
N/A
N/A
curvature ratio
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 September 2017

Cross Section 7
■ 7
--`
0
4999.782 r (MB XS7 R)MB XS�
--`
9.95
4999.595 ri (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
19.23
4999.245 IO (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -
--�
26.88
4998.814 r- (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -
--�
--�
33.55
39.58
4998.418 rM (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -
4998.183 O (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
d
•
--�
42.53.
4998.398 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
42.81
4998.255 0 (MB XS7 R LTB)MB XS7 R L�
--�
43.761
4997.805 O (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R _
-
--�
45 )
4997.736 O (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R _
--
4997.545 O (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--F46.49
4996.327 (MB XS7 R LEW)MB XS7 R LEIM
.-
--�
46.75
4996.191 (MB XS7 R LCH)MB XS7 R LCH_A
--�
47.85
4996.065 Q (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
48.43
4994.929 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R _
• •
--�
50.08
4994.636 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R _
--�
50.57
4994.562 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
51.18
4994.626 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
0.035
--'
51.69
4994.695 0 (MB XS7 R TWG)MB XS�
■
--�
54.28
4994.905 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
54.93
4995.166 0 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
--�
56.2
4995.214 0 (MB XS7 R RCH)MB XS7 R RCH
■
--�
56.65
4996.338 0 (MB XS7 R REW)MB XS7 R REW
--�
57.12
4997.598 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R mA
■
--'
60.26
4998.71 C (MB XS7 R RTB)MB XS7 R R�
--�
--�
--�
--�
--�
--�
--§}.62
62.45
66.39
71.37
76.15
77.96
83.42
90.98
4998.523 r (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
4998.637 (MB XS7 R)MB XS7
4999.118 L■- (MB XS7 R)MB XS7
4999.441 L� (MB XS7 R)MB XS7
4999.44 L■F (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R
4999.571 ■■ (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -
4999.702 ■ (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -
4999.782 ■ (MB XS7 R)MB XS7 R -

6995
6994
6993
6992
6991
c
0 6990
ca
6989
UJ 6988
6987
6986
6985
0 20
Bankfull Dimensions
76.1
x -section area (ft.sq.)
52.4
width (ft)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
4.1
max depth (ft)
54.9
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.4
hydraulic radius (ft)
36.1
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
2.4
velocity (fUs)
179.9
discharge rate (cfs)
0.35
Froude number
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station
alignment straight me
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation - ---
Low Bank Height
elevation • •m� -
Flood Prone Area
width fpa � 100.5
Channel Slope
percent slope 0.199
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n"---
D'Arcy - Weisbach'T'
For Stream T e:
Is braided channel?
Sinuosity, k
D50 ---
Note:
Meadow Branch. riffle
40 60 80 100 120
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
Materials
6990.252
6989.961
6989.202
6988.487�r■=
100.5
W flood prone area (ft)
---
D50 (mm)
1.9
entrenchment ratio
---
D84 (mm)
4.1
low bank height (ft)
8
threshold grain size (mm):
1.0
low bank height ratio
39.82
6987.761
(XS8 LTB)XS8 LT�
--�
Rosgen Stream Type
6987.035
(XS8 LEW)XS8 LE_
---
Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50, slope
Flow Resistance
(XS8 LCH)XS8 LCI_
Forces &
Power
0.035
Manning's roughness
0.199
channel slope (%)
0.13
Darcy -Weisbach fric.
0.17
shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
---
resistance factor u/u*
0.30
shear velocity (ft/s)
---
relative roughness
0.43
unit strm power (Ib/fUs)
6990.03°
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
fftl (ft) (ft) fft) Bkf
M
-� 0
-� 9.98.
-N 20.411
-N 27.691
6990.252
6989.961
6989.202
6988.487�r■=
11ML (MB XS8 R)M�
1r■� (XS8)XS8
10 (XS8)XS8 _
(XS8)XS8 _
'-N
'-�
32.511
33.860
6988.268�r■=
6987.771
(XS8)XS8 _
(XS8)XS8 _
-, 37.55
6987.843
(XS8)XS8 i
-� 38.98
6987.78
(XS8)XS8 _
--,
39.82
6987.761
(XS8 LTB)XS8 LT�
--�
40.6
6987.035
(XS8 LEW)XS8 LE_
-� 40.94M
6986.231
(XS8 LCH)XS8 LCI_
-N 41.631
6985.946 1� (XS8)XS8
-N 42.491
6986.058 1Q (XS8 TWG)XS8 TN
-N 44.121
6986.299
10 (XS8)XS8 _
-� 45.650
6986.161
(XS8 RCH)XS8 RCI_
-� 45.67
6986.999 (XS8 REW)XS8 RE_
-� 46.46
6987.67
(XS8)XS8 _
-� 47.63.
6987.747
(XS8)XS8 _
-N 50.521
6988.627
10 (XS8)XS8 IlIl
-N 52.581
6988.722
10 (XS8)XS8 -
-, 54.121
6989.178
10 (XS8 RTB)XS�
-� 56.340
6989.486 (XS8)XS8 -
-� 57.91
6989.951
(XS8)XS8
-� 66.46
6990.375
(XS8)XS8 _
-� 79.07
6990.683
(XS8)XS8 _
-� 90.65,
6990.794
(XS8)XS8 _
-8100.M`6990.995
1L (XSB)XS8
��l
JL■fit �

oaao
6994
6992
x
� 6990
0
0
6988
W 6986
6984
6982
0 20
Bankfull Dimensions
90.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
66.7
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
5.1
max depth (ft)
70.4
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.3
hydraulic radius (ft)
49.1
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
2.2
velocity (ftls)
203.9
discharge rate (cfs)
0.35
Froude number
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station _
alignment stl might fne
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope 0.199
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n"
D'Arcy - Weisbach "f'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel?
Sinuosity, k
D50M---
Note:
Meadow Branch, riffle
40
60 80
XS9 RUN
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
126.5
W flood prone area (ft)
1.9
entrenchment ratio
5.1
low bank height (ft)
1.0
low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.035 Manning's roughness
0.13 Darcy-Weisbachfric.
--- resistance factor u/u*
--- relative roughness
3.31 ,
100 120 140
Materials
8 threshold grain size (mm):
Rosaen Stream TvDe
--- Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50, slope
Forces & Power
0.199 channel
0.16 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.29 shear velocity (ft/s)
0.38 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
(ftl (ft) (ft) (ft) Bkf
-E
0 M� ■�KMB XS9 RUN)MB
XS9 RUN
-E
-E
14.1 f 6989.`ffE7= AB XS9 RUN)MB
25.7 1 6989.5 �§(S9)XS9
XS9 RUN
-40.89
1 6989.Mr■_§(S9)XS9
-51.63
-57.54
1 6989.1Mr■_§(S9)XS9
1 6988.7 �j(S9)XS9
-59.73
1 6988.1M ■�JXS9 LTB)XS9 LTB
i
-61.45
1 6987.MjXS9)XS9
-E
63.1 1 6987.2 �h(S9)XS9
-63.85
1 6986.2 �§(S9)XS9
-64.16
1 6985.3 �§(S9 LEW)XS9 LEW
-64.61
1 6985.0 �§(S9 LCH)XS9 LCH
-66.13
1 6984.1M ■� jXS9)XS9
i
-68.18
1 6983.9 �k(S9)XS9
-70.14
1 6983.7 �§(S9)XS9
-71.19
1 6983.6 �J(S9 TWG)XS9 TW�
-73.52
1 6984.1M ■�h(S9)XS9
-75.14
1 6984.5 �§(S9 RCH)XS9 RCI
-
-75.65
1 6985.4 �rXS9 REW)XS9 REt�
-76.04
1 6987.1M ■�JXS9 RTB)XS9 RTB-
-78.15
1 6987.3 �jXS9)XS9
-86.95
1 69 8 7. M� L(S 9 )XS 9
-96.87
1 6987.= ■�§(S9)XS9
-11.661
6988.4 �WS9)XS9
-26.48'
6988.7. ■�I(S9)XS9
-

6002
6001
6000
5999
c 5998
0
m 5997
tj 5996
5995
5994
5993
0
10
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Dimensions
9.1
x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.6
width (ft)
1.2
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
8.8
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.0
hydraulic radius (ft)
6.4
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
4.4
velocity (ft/s)
39.5
discharge rate (cfs)
0.76
Froude number
East Fork 1. riffle
20 30 40
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
29.3 W flood prone area (ft)
3.8 entrenchment ratio
2.2 low bank height (ft)
1.3 low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.035 Manning's roughness
0.14 Darcy -Weisbach Eric.
--- resistance factor u/u'
--- relative roughness
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station --
alignment
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation -- 1.512
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa 29.3
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n" i i ---
D'Arcy -Weisbach "f'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel? E-1Sinuosity, k
D50
Note:
MENU=
50 60 70
Materials
--- D50 (mm)
--- D84 (mm)
32 threshold grain size (mm):
Rosaen Stream Tvoe
--- Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50,
Forces & Power
1.01 channel slope (%)
0.65 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.58 shear velocity (ft/s)
3.3 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
80

6001
6000
5999
5998
c 5997
0
76
5996
0
ED 5995
5994
5993
5992
0 10
East Fork 1, pool
20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
Bankfull Dimensions
Flood Dimensions
Materials
13.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
--- W flood prone area (ft)
---
D50 (mm)
8.6
width (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
---
D84 (mm)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
--- low bank height (ft)
39
threshold grain size (mm):
2.2
max depth (ft)
--- low bank height ratio
10.6
wetted perimeter (ft)
Rosgen Stream Type
1.3
hydraulic radius (ft)
---
5.6
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
Flow Resistance
Forces & Power
5.0
velocity (ft/s)
0.035 Manning's roughness
1.01
channel slope (%)
66.3
discharge rate (cfs)
0.13 Darcy -Weisbach fric.
0.79
shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.78
Froude number
--- resistance factor u/u*
0.64
shear velocity (ft/s)
--- relative roughness
4.9
unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station
alignment arraight line
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation ---
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa 41.8
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning's"n" i i ---
D'Arcy - Weisbach T'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel? ElSinuosity, k
D50
Note:
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes

5999
5998
5997
x
5996
0
> 5995
m
w
5994
5993
5992
0
Bankfull Dimensions
10
10.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.7
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
10.6
wetted perimeter (ft)
1.0
hydraulic radius (ft)
8.8
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
4.3 velocity (ftls)
46.3 discharge rate (cfs)
0.76 Froude number
Cross Section
reference ID�
longitudinal station
alignment s!raignt line
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning's"n" 2--
D'Arcy - Weisbach "f'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel? ❑
Sinuosity, k
D50
Note:
East Fork 1, riffle
20 30 40
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
Materials
38.8
W flood prone area (ft)
---
D50 (mm)
4.0
entrenchment ratio
---
D84 (mm)
1.8
low bank height (ft)
31
threshold grain size (mm):
1.1
low bank height ratio
Rosgen Stream Type
---
Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50,
Flow Resistance
Forces & Power
0.035
Manning's roughness
1.01
channel slope (%)
0.14
Darcy -Weisbach fric.
0.64
shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
---
resistance factor u/u*
0.57
shear velocity (ft/s)
---
relative roughness
3
unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
1.394
50
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
60

5003
5002
5001
C
0 5000
m
to 4999
4998
4997
0
10
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Dimensions
4.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.1
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.1
max depth (ft)
6.3
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.7
hydraulic radius (ft)
5.5
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
4.9
velocity (ftls)
23.0
discharge rate (cfs)
0.99
Froude number
Cross Section
West Fork 1. riffle
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
6.1 W flood prone area (ft)
1.2 entrenchment ratio
2.6 low bank height (ft)
2.5 low bank height ratio
reference ID
�
longitudinal station
alignment seraghtiine
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning's "n" t t
D'Arcy - Weisbach T'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel? ❑
Sinuosity, k
Deo ---
Note:
Flow Resistance
0.035 Manning's roughness
0.16 Darcy -Weisbach fric.
--- resistance factor u/u*
--- relative roughness
60 70
Materials
--- D50 (mm)
--- D84 (mm)
44 threshold grain size (mm):
Rosaen Stream Tvne
Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50,
Forces & Power
1.92 channel slope (%)
0.90 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.68 shear velocity (ft/s)
5.4 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
80 90
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes

6992
6991
c
6990
m
LU
6989
6988
0
10
R)UT2
Elevation (ft)
Bankfull
Dimensions
5.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
6.7
width (ft)
0.8
mean depth (ft)
1.1
max depth (ft)
7.4
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.7
hydraulic radius (ft)
8.8
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
4.4 velocity (ftls)
22.5 discharge rate (cfs)
0.92 Froude number
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station
alignment s•. .; .t Ir,e
feature
Bankfull Stae
elevation
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
81.1
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning 's "n"
D'Arcy - Weisbach "f'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel?
Sinuosity, k
D50
Note:
West Fork 2. riffle
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
81.8 W flood prone area (ft)
12.1 entrenchment ratio
1.6 low bank height (ft)
1.5 low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.035 Manning's roughness
0.16 Darcy -Weisbach fric.
--- resistance factor u/u*
--- relative roughness
0.97:
60 70 80
Materials
--- D50 (mm)
--- D84 (mm)
36 threshold grain size (mm):
Rosaen Stream Tvoe
Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50,
Forces & Power
1.68 channel slope (%)
0.74 shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.62 shear velocity (ft/s)
3.5 unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Bkf
90
ai 0�
■�F4
R)UT2
XS4 F
MOO.140s991.1-r■_IUT2
�M9.95On 699-
■�JUT2
XS4 R)UT2
XS4 R)UT2
XS4 1
XS4
—M8.47'r990.=r■_jUT2
XS4 R)UT2
XS4
—M3.95 6990.Mr■_IUT2
XS4 R)UT2
XS4
—M6.65 69902M
■�JXS4
LTB)XS4
LTB A
—=8.11 JJM1989.959
N�JXS4)XS4
M
—=9.1405989.403
�JXS4)XS4
0
—M9.5905989.225
�JXS4
LCH)XS4
LCHU
—=0.7403989.1162
�JXS4)XS4
'Ell
—5 1.5775989.135
�JXS4
TWG)XS4
TWG _
—M2.73 6989.164
�JXS4
RCH)XS4
RCI-(
—553.7 6989.611
�JXS4)XS4
—=4.360&990.64
�JXS4)XS4
'
—`5.0205990.915
�JXS4
RTB%jilill
—=9.2905990.971
�JXS4)XS4�
—=5.5305990.987
�JXS4)XS4
—55.1805991.029
JXS4)XS4
—
—5=1.14ED990.87
�JXS4)XS4
—

6991.5
6991
90.5
c-------------------------------------
2
----------------------------- -° 6990
m
1989.5
6989
6988.5
0 10 20
Bankfull Dimensions
5.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.5
width (ft)
0.9
mean depth (ft)
1.1
max depth (ft)
6.7
wetted perimeter (ft)
0.7
hydraulic radius (ft)
6.2
width -depth ratio
Bankfull
Flow
4.5
velocity (ft/s)
22.4
discharge rate (cfs)
0.93
Froude number
Cross Section
reference ID
longitudinal station
alignment,so-aigntiine
feature
Bankfull Stage
elevation
Low Bank Height
elevation
Flood Prone Area
width fpa
Channel Slope
percent slope
Flow Resistance
Manning's'W: i
D'Arcy - Weisbach "f'
For Stream Type:
Is braided channel?
Sinuosity, k
D50
Note:
EJEE�=
West Fork 2, riffle
30 40 50
Width (ft)
Flood Dimensions
81.7 W flood prone area (ft)
14.8 entrenchment ratio
1.4 low bank height (ft)
1.3 low bank height ratio
Flow Resistance
0.035 Manning's roughness
0.16 Darcy -Weisbach Eric.
--- resistance factor u/u'
--- relative roughness
utera
60 70 80
Materials
0
---
D50 (mm)
---
D84 (mm)
38
threshold grain size (mm):
Rosgen Stream Type
---
Missing: , , Sinuosity, D50,
Forces & Power
1.68
channel slope (%)
0.78
shear stress (Ib/sq.ft.)
0.63
shear velocity (ft/s)
4.2
unit strm power (Ib/ft/s)
easting northing Distance Elevation Omit Notes
(ft) (81 (ft) (ft) Rkf
90
-tea
0
.1 6990.50�b
--M
0.351
JP990.60r_i
--W0.5
05990.50=
--W0.3859990.6or_M
--M6.4505990.4ar_-
--M7.9105990.39"�-
--M9.1505989.846
--M9.8405989.546
--X40.1805989.121
--XL1.14��989.005
L_�I
--X42.4305988.987
--W3.5705988.867■�-
�-
--4.4505988.915
�-
--14.6805990.023
L_-
--W5.3905990.289_,�-
--1&9.3
05990.40L_-
--W7.3209990AM9
--W5.7505990.60L_-
--W4.0405990AM60-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
East Fork 1, Cross Section 3
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100 -Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4
8
8
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
2
10
Fine
0.125
0.250
80
10
Medium
0.25
0.50
70
10
SPC�O
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
2
12
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
4
8
20
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
20
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
30
20
Fine
4.0
5.6
20
Fine
5.6
8.0
7
14
34
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
8
42
GAP
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
8
50
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
8
58
Coarse
22.6
32
4
8
66
Very Coarse
32
45
7
14
80
Very Coarse
45
64
4
8
88
Small
64
90
4
8
96
Small
90
128
2
4
100
Large
128
180
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
0 S5�
�
Small
362
512
100
�pJ
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1 1024 1
2048
1 100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048 1
>2048
1 100
Totall
50
100
1 100
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
1.41
D35 =
8.32
D50 =
16.0
D. =
53.7
D95 =
86.2
D100 =1
128.0
East Fork 1, Cross Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
c
d
y
60
a
50
N
M
40
30
v
20
v
10
0
o�'L yti5 otih Oy
o• o
'y ti ti$ d yro W y1 "o (0 .S'1 py roC` CO 41 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L yO.yp ti p$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
East Fork 1, Cross Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100 -Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
5
10
10
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
10
Silticlay
Fine
0.125
0.250
Sand.
10
Medium
0.25
0.50
70
10
SPC�O
Coarse
0.5
1.0
y
10
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
10
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
10
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
2
12
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
2
14
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
8
22
Medium
8.0
11.0
10
22
GAP
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
4
26
0
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
4
30
Particle Class Size (mm)
Coarse
22.6
32
7
14
44
Very Coarse
32
45
4
8
52
Very Coarse
45
64
11
22
74
Small
64
90
4
8
82
Small
90
128
2
4
86
`c6
Large
128
180
1
2
88
Large
180
256
88
Small
256
362
88
�0
Small
362
512
88
�pJ
Medium
512
1024
88
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
88
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
6
12
100
Total
50
100
100
East Fork 1, Cross Section 1
Cross Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
6.12
D35 =
25.59
D50 =
41.3
D. =
107.3
D95 =
3068.5
D100 =1
>2048
East Fork 1, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
100
90
90
Silticlay
Sand.
ravel -01
70
c
d
y
ble
a
50
80
M
40
er
Bedrock
30
70
v
20
v
j 60
10
50
0
,b'L yti5 otih Oy
0 0
CO
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� ,L,yC� .1�'1' py roC` y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L yO.yp tip$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016
E
i? 40
y 30
u
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
- MYO-10/2016
East Fork 1, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
c
d
y
60
a
50
N
M
40
30
v
20
v
10
0
,b'L yti5 otih Oy
0 0
CO
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� ,L,yC� .1�'1' py roC` y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L yO.yp tip$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
East Fork 1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
10
7
17
17
17
D100 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
90
Silt/Clay
90
17
Fine
0.125
0.250
3
3
3
20
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
1
21
SQ$�0
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
2
23
m
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
0
1
1
24
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
� 70
M
24
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
24
Fine
4.0
5.6
24
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
1
5
5
29
JFK,
Medium
8.0
11.0
6
1
7
7
36
0+11�
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
3
8
8
44
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
10
10
54
Coarse
22.6
32
7
5
12
12
66
Very Coarse
32
45
3
2
5
5
71
Very Coarse
45
64
4
8
12
12
83
Small
64
90
1
4
5
5
88
�5�
Small
90
128
3
3
3
91
`00
Large
128
180
1
1
1
92
Large
180
256
92
Small
256
362
92
pF�
V
Small
362
512
0
92
OpJ
Medium
512
1024
92
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO -10/2016
92
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
1
7
8
8
100
Total
s0
s0
100
100
100
East Fork 1, Reachwide
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
10.51
D50 =
19.7
DS4 =
68.5
D95 =
2655.9
D100 =
>2048
East Fork 1, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
100
90
Silt/Clay
90
Sand
avel
80
c
v
70
bble
er
80
m
60
0
a ro
� 70
M
U
40
3
30
4' 60
v
2
v
20
Z 50
10
E
0
oti by ye oy ti ti tiw
00 oti o
a e6 e titi ti� 6 3ti ay �o yw yo �� 6ti titi yo e ��
�ti. ti ti ti 3 y 10 ,yo°` �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MVO -10/2016
40
y 30
u
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO -10/2016
East Fork 1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
c
v
70
m
60
0
50
M
U
40
3
30
v
2
v
20
10
0
oti by ye oy ti ti tiw
00 oti o
a e6 e titi ti� 6 3ti ay �o yw yo �� 6ti titi yo e ��
�ti. ti ti ti 3 y 10 ,yo°` �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MVO -10/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
West Fork 2, Cross Section 5
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100 -Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
32
64
64
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
4
8
72
Fine
0.125
0.250
70
72
Medium
0.25
0.50
70
72
SPC�O
Coarse
0.5
1.0
y
72
60
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
72
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
40
72
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
2
74
Fine
4.0
5.6
74
Fine
5.6
8.0
8
16
90
Medium
8.0
11.0
3
6
96
GAP
Medium
11.0
16.0
o• o
96
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
2
98
Coarse
22.6
32
98
Very Coarse
32
45
1
2
100
Very Coarse
45
64
100
Small
64
90
100
y
Small
90
128
100
`C6
Large
128
180
100
Large
180
256
30
100
Small
256 1
362
100
0 S5�
�
Small
362
512
100
�pJ
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
1
100
Totall
50
100
100
Cross Section 5
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
Silt/Clay
D. =
7.0
D95 =
10.4
D100 =1
45.0
West Fork 2, Cross Section 5
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SiltlClay
Sand. ave,
bble
80
er
Bedrock
70
70
c
d
y
60
60
0
N
50
M
40
30
j
v
v
20
10
50
0
ofL yti5 otih Oy
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� ,L,yC� .1�'1' py /off` CO y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L
o• o
yO.yp tip$ pogo
E
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016
i?
40
y
u
30
CL
20
10
0
0.01 0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
-MYO-10/2016
West Fork 2, Cross Section 5
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
c
d
y
60
0
N
50
M
40
30
v
v
20
10
0
ofL yti5 otih Oy
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� ,L,yC� .1�'1' py /off` CO y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L
o• o
yO.yp tip$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
West Fork 2, Cross Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100 -Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
27
54
54
D95 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
4
8
62
Fine
0.125
0.250
60
62
Medium
0.25
0.50
70
62
SPC�O
Coarse
0.5
1.0
y
62
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
2
64
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
40
64
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
v
64
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
2
66
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
4
70
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
8
78
GAP
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
4
82
Particle Class Size (mm)
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
4
86
Coarse
22.6
32
3
6
92
Very Coarse
32
45
2
4
96
Very Coarse
45
64
a
96
Small
64
90
1
2
98
Small
90
128
1
2
100
`C6
Large
128
180
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
0 S5�
�
Small
362
512
100
�pJ
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
lBedrock
2048
>2048
1
1 100
Totall
50
100
1 100
Cross Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
Silt/Clay
D. =
19.0
D95 =
41.3
D100 =1
128.0
West Fork 2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 SiltlClay
Sand. avel
bble
80
er
Bedrock
70
60
j
70
c
d
y
60
50
0
N
50
M
40
E
v
v
20
i?
40
0
ofL yti5 otih Oy
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� C� .1�'1' py /off` CO y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L
y
yO.yp tip$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016
u
30
a
20
10
0
0.01 0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
-MYO-10/2016
West Fork 2, Cross Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
c
d
y
60
0
N
50
M
40
30
v
v
20
10
0
ofL yti5 otih Oy
'y ti ti$ d h� W y1 y� C� .1�'1' py /off` CO y,14 tigO �y6 ��'1. yy'L
o• o
yO.yp tip$ pogo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MVO -10/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97131
Existing Conditions - 2016
West Fork 2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
Reach Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
SILT/CLAY
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
34
20
54
54
54
D100 =
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
4
4
58
Fine
0.125
0.250
3
3
3
61
Medium
0.25
0.50
40
61
SQ$�0
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
62
m
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
a
62
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
M
62
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
62
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
63
Fine
5.6
8.0
3
3
6 1
6
69
JFK
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
70
G�
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
1
71
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
2
8
8
79
Coarse
22.6
32
2
1
3
3
82
Very Coarse
32
45
2
3
5
5
87
0.01 0.1
Very Coarse
45
64
5
5
5
92
Small
64
90
3
1 2
5
5
97
Small
90
128
1
1
2
2
99
`00
Large
128
180
1
1
1
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
pF�
V
Small
362
512
100
OpJ
Medium
512
1024
1
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
60
40
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
Silt/Clay
DS4 =
36.7
D95 =
78.5
D100 =
180.0
West Fork 2, Reachwide
West Fork 2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
90 Silt/Clay Sand
aveI
bble er
80
a ro
70
60
50
E
90
80
c
40
v
70
m
60
a
50
M
y 30
u
40
3
30
v
a 20
2
v
20
10
10
0
otitis yeoy ti titiw
00 oti o
t- lb 1.63tiay��o.ywyo��6tititi y1, eeb
�ti. ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MVO -10/2016
0
0.01 0.1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MVO -10/2016
West Fork 2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
c
v
70
m
60
a
50
M
U
40
3
30
v
2
v
20
10
0
otitis yeoy ti titiw
00 oti o
t- lb 1.63tiay��o.ywyo��6tititi y1, eeb
�ti. ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MVO -10/2016

tam
F
INQUIRY #: 4550401.1
YEAR: 1951 CED�R'
500'
466

m
9
IT
jy

A
INQUIRY #: 4550401.1
YEAR: 1983
= 500'
%a
4N
(EEDR'

- - r- _1•_ .rig;'::..• r _
`;L. o
x �:`� . �: ,S :•- �. ter: ,i
Win:;.. � •�;�
ti .f_

INQUIRY #: 4550401.1
YEAR: 2009
i I = 500,
i�W
N
(CEDR

A
ff

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site - Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters
Parameter
stream type
drainage area
bankfull discharge
bankfull cross-sectional
area
average velocity during
bankfull event
Cross -Section
Notation
DA
Qbkf
Abkf
Vbkf
width at bankfull
Wbkf
maximum depth at
dmax
bankfull
1.2
mean depth at bankfull
dbkf
bankfull width to depth
Wbkf/dbkf
ratio
9.3
depth ratio
dmax/dbkf
bank height ratio
BHR
floodprone area width
Wfpa
entrenchment ratio
ER
Slope
2.5 2.7
valley slope
Svalley
channel slope
Schannel
Profile
0.0150
riffle slope
Sniffle
riffle slope ratio
Sriffle/Schannel
pool slope
Spool
pool slope ratio
Spool/Schannel
pool -to -pool spacing
Lp-p
pool spacing ratio
Lp-p/Wbkf
pool cross-sectional area
Ap°ol
at bankfull
pool area ratio
Apool/Abkf
maximum pool depth at
dp°ol
bankfull
pool depth ratio
dpool/dbkf
pool width at bankfull
Wpool
pool width ratio
Wpool/Wbkf
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 97131
Units
sq mi
cfs
SF
fps
feet
feet
feet
feet
ft/ft
ft/ft
ft/ft
ft/ft
feet
SF
feet
feet
UT to Cane Spencer Creek 3
Creek
min max min max
E4 E4
0.29 0.37
40 35
8.9 12.2 6.6 8.7
3.8 5 5.6
11.5 12.3
6.3
9.3
1.2 1.6
1
1.2
0.8 1.0
0.8
1.0
12.3 14.4
7.9
9.3
49 91
1.2
1.3
1.4 2.5
1.0
1.0
31
14
125
2.5 2.7
1.7
4.3
0.0260
0.022
0.031
0.0150
0.019
0.022
0.015 0.035
0.0184
0.034-
1.7 3.9
1
1.6
0.0008 0.003
0.0007
0.014
0.09 0.38
0.00
0.60
49 91
9
46
2.6 4.7
1.4
4.9
29.2
6.5
9.8
1.2 1.4
1
1.1
2.5 2.9
1.2
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.8
15.3
6
12
0.8
1.0
1.3
Page 1
Appendix 4
October 2017

Parameter
Pattern
sinuosity
belt width
meander width ratio
linear wavelength
(formerly meander
length)
linear wavelength ratio
(formerly meander length
ratio)
meander length
meander length ratio
radius of curvature
radius of curvature ratio
Sediment
d5o Description
Reach Wide
UT to Cane
Creek
Notation Units min max
K 1.40
Wblt feet 102
Wblt/Wbkf 8.3 8.9
Lm feet 45 81
Lm/Wbkf 1 1 3.9
Lm feet
Lm/W bkf
Rc feet 23
Rc/ Wbkf 2.0
d16
d35
d5o
d84
d95
6.6
38
3.1
Spencer Creek 3
min
max
1.0
1.3
10
50
1.6
5.4
55
142
8.7
53
8.4
12
1.9
15.3
178
19.1
85
9.1
Medium Gravel Medium Gravel
mm 0.6 1.866
mm 12.2 8.85
mm 27.8 11
mm 74.5 64
mm 128 128
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site - Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters
Parameter
stream type
drainage area
bankfull discharge
bankfull cross-sectional
area
average velocity during
bankfull event
Cross -Section
width at bankfull
maximum depth at
bankfull
mean depth at bankfull
bankfull width to depth
ratio
depth ratio
bank height ratio
floodprone area width
entrenchment ratio
Slope
valley slope
channel slope
Profile
riffle slope
riffle slope ratio
pool slope
pool slope ratio
pool -to -pool spacing
pool spacing ratio
pool cross-sectional area
at bankfull
pool area ratio
maximum pool depth at
bankfull
pool depth ratio
pool width at bankfull
pool width ratio
Notation
DA
Qbkf
Abkf
Vbkf
Wbkf
dmax
dbkf
Wbkf/dbkf
dmax/dbkf
BHR
Wfpa
ER
Sval ley
Schannel
Sniffle
Sriffle/Schannel
Spool
Spool/Schannel
Lp-p
Lp-p/Wbkf
Apool
Apool/Abkf
dpooi
d pool/d bkf
Wpool
Wpool/Wbkf
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 97131
Units
sq mi
cfs
SF
fps
feet
feet
feet
feet
ft/ft
UT to Richland
Creek 1
min max
C4/E4
0.28
32
7.8 8.5
4.1
8.8
10.4
1.1
1.3
0.8
0.9
10.0
12.8
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.1
28
31
2.5
4.0
ft/ft 0.0131
0.0178
ft/ft 0.018
0.036
12.3
1.3
2.5
ft/ft
0.000
0.004
2.5
0.00
0.27
feet
33
93
0.015
2.5
6.1
SF
1.8
1.8
0.09
1.4
1.6
feet
14.7
16.0
29.2
1.0
1.2
feet
14.7
15.8
1.9
0.9
0.9
Page 1
UT to Cane
Creek
min max
E4
0.29
40
8.9 12.2
3.8
11.5 1 12.3
1.2
1.6
0.8
1.0
12.3
14.4
1.4
2.5
31
2.5
2.7
0.0260
0.0150
0.015
0.035
1.7
3.9
0.0008
0.003
0.09
0.38
49
91
2.6
4.7
29.2
1.2
1.4
2.5
2.9
1.9
15.3
0.8
Spencer Creek 3
min max
E4
0.37
35
6.6 8.7
5 5.6
6.3 9.3
1 1.2
0.8 1.0
7.9 9.3
1.2 1.3
1.0 1.0
14 125
1.7 4.3
0.022 0.031
0.019 0.022
).0184 0.034-
1 1.6
).0007 0.014
0.00 0.60
9 46
1.4 4.9
6.5 9.8
1 1.1
1.2 1.8
1.5 1.8
6 12
1.0 1.3
Appendix 4
October 2017

Parameter
Pattern
sinuosity
belt width
meander width ratio
linear wavelength
(formerly meander
length)
linear wavelength ratio
(formerly meander length
ratio)
meander length
meander length ratio
radius of curvature
radius of curvature ratio
Sediment
dso Description
Reach Wide
UT to Richland
Creek 1
Notation Units min max
K 1.00
Wblt feet
Wblt/Wbkf
Lm feet
Lm/W bkf
Lm
Lm/W bkf
Rc
Rc/ Wbkf
d16
d35
dso
d84
d95
feet
feet
mm
mm
mm
mm
UT to Cane
6.6
8.7
15.3
Spencer
Creek 3
Creek
178
min max
min
max
1.40
1.0
1.3
102
10
50
8.3
8.9
1.6
5.4
45
81
55
142
3.9
6.6
8.7
15.3
53
178
8.4
19.1
23
38
12
85
2.0
3.1
1.9
9.1
Medium Gravel Medium Gravel
0.6 1.866
12.2 8.85
27.8 11
74.5 64
128 128
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017

Parameter I
Notation
stream type
dmaX
drainage area
DA
bankfull discharge
Qbkf
bankfull cross-
1.7
sectional area
Abkf
average velocity
5.3
during bankfull
Vbkf
event
BHR
Cross -Section
>50
width at bankfull
Wbkf
maximum depth at
dmaX
bankfull
1.3
mean depth at
dbkf
bankfull
1.7
bankfull width to
wbkf/dbkf
depth ratio
5.3
depth ratio
dmax/dbkf
bank height ratio
BHR
floodprone area
>50
width
Wfpa
entrenchment ratio
ER
Slope
0.013
valley slope
Svalley
channel slope
Schannel
Profile
riffle slope
Sriffle
riffle slope ratio
Sriffle/Schannel
pool slope
Spool
pool slope ratio
Spool/Schannel
pool -to -pool spacing
Lp-p
pool spacing ratio
Lp-p/Wbkf
pool cross-sectional
2.6
area at bankfull
Ap°ol
pool area ratio
Apool/Abkf
maximum pool
dp°ol
depth at bankfull
0.00
pool depth ratio
dpool/dbkf
pool width at
26.3
bankfull
wp°°I
pool width ratio
Wpool/Wbkf
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site
DMS ID No. 97131
Units
sq mi
cfs
SF
fps
UT to Rocky Creek
Min Max
E4b
1.05
85.0
16.3
5.5
feet
19.4
12.2
2.1
feet
1.3
1.8
15.7
feet
1.7
1.3
101
2.9
5.3
9.1
1.2
1.5
1.3
>50
>3.4
1.0
0.006
feet
0.013
72.4
3.3
3.0
6.0
ft/ft
0.10
0.026
0.80
ft/ft
0.024
3.4
ft/ft
0.061
25.5
0.089
33.4
2.6
3.8
ft/ft
0.00
0.8
0.004
1.2
0.00
0.16
feet
26.3
Appendix 4
81
2.2
6.7
SF
19.3
1.2
feet
2.2
1.6
feet
10.9
0.9
Page 3
Foust Creek US
Min Max
C4
1.40
95.2
23.9 24.1
4.0
18.5
19.4
1.8
2.1
1.2
1.3
14.3
15.7
1.4
1.7
55
101
2.9
5.3
29.2
1.2
2.5
1.9
15.3
0.8
34.9
1.5
2.9
2.3
20.5
1.1
Long Branch
Min Max
C/E4
1.49
124.0
34.6
4.0
14.8
18.6
1.9
2.9
1.3
2.1
7.9
13.8
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.5
>50
>3.4
0.006
0.0040
0.013
0.012
3.3
3.0
0.000
0.003
0.10
0.80
50
105
3.4
7.1
25.5
33.4
1.0
1.3
2.2
0.8
1.2
16.2
18.8
0.9
1.3
Appendix 4
October 2017

Pattern
sinuosity
K
1.10
1.30
belt width
Wbit
feet
60
meander width ratio
Wbit/Wbkf
3.2
4.1
linear wavelength
(formerly meander
Lm
feet
66
191
length)
linear wavelength
ratio (formerly
Lm/wbkf
4.5
10.3
meander length
ratio)
meander length
Lm
feet
--
--
meander length
Lm/wbkf
--
--
ratio
radius of curvature
Rc
feet
16
87
radius of curvature
Rc/ wbkf
1.10
4.7
ratio
Sediment
dso Description
Coarse Gravel
d16
mm
<0.063
9.6
8.1
d35
mm
2.4
37
26.6
Reach Wide
dso
mm
22.6
61
41.6
d84
mm
120
130
124.8
d95
mm
256
1100
225.5
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 4 October 2017

Deep Meadow Mitil
stream type
drainage area
design discharge
bankfull cross-
sectional area
average velocity
during bankfull
event
Cross -Section
width at bankfull
maximum depth
at bankfull
mean depth at
bankfull
bankfull width to
depth ratio
max depth ratio
bank height ratio
floodprone area
width
entrenchment
ratio
Slope
valley slope
channel slope
Profile
riffle slope
riffle slope ratio
pool slope
pool slope ratio
pool -to -pool
spacing
pool spacing ratio
pool cross-
sectional area
pool area ratio
maximum pool
depth
WDeep Meadow
DMS ID No. 971
ration Site
Notation
DA
Q
Abkf
Vbkf
Wbkf
dmax
dbkf
Wbkf/d bkf
dmax/dbkf
BHR
Wfpa
ER
- Design Geomorphic Parameters
EF1
Units
Min Max
E4/1
sq mi 0.35
cfs 34
SF 8.7
fps 3.4
feet
10.2
feet
1.0
1.3
feet
0.8
Svalley
1.7
12
feet
1.4
1.4
6.0
1.0
1.0
feet
30
68
4.5
2.2
5.0
WF1
Min Max
C4/1
0.09
10
4.4
3.3
8.1
0.5 0.9
WF2
Min Max
E4
0.20
20
6.6
3.2
8.9
0.8 1.2
0.5
12.7
15
1.0
1.0
Svalley
1.7
1.0
70
1.0
18
6.0
36
2.2
4.5
WF2
Min Max
E4
0.20
20
6.6
3.2
8.9
0.8 1.2
Lp-p/Wbkf
Apool
Apool/Abkf
d pool
Mitigation 5
31
SF
feet
ite
4.7
11
1.3
1.4
Page 1
8.6
12
1.4
2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.0
9
1.4
2.6
appendix 4
ober 2017
0.7
12.7
1.1
1.7
1.0
Svalley
1.0
26
70
2.2
0.0183
6.0
Lp-p/Wbkf
Apool
Apool/Abkf
d pool
Mitigation 5
31
SF
feet
ite
4.7
11
1.3
1.4
Page 1
8.6
12
1.4
2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.0
9
1.4
2.6
appendix 4
ober 2017
feet/
Svalley
0.0124
0.0167
0.0183
foot
feet/
Schnl
foot
0.0042
0.0182
0.0128
0.0192
0.0042
0.0264
feet/
Sriffle
0.007
0.031
NA
NA
0.014
0.036
foot
Sriffle/Schnl
1
3.7
NA
NA
1.2
3.7
feet/
Sp
foot
0.000
0.0000
NA
NA
0.000
0.0000
Sp/Schnl
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
Lp-p
feet
41
75
NA
NA
22
69
Lp-p/Wbkf
Apool
Apool/Abkf
d pool
Mitigation 5
31
SF
feet
ite
4.7
11
1.3
1.4
Page 1
8.6
12
1.4
2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.0
9
1.4
2.6
appendix 4
ober 2017

pool depth ratio
pool width at
bankfull
pool width ratio
Pattern
sinuosity
belt width
meander width
ratio
linear wavelength
(formerly
meander length)
linear wavelength
ratio (formerly
meander length
ratio)
meander length
meander length
ratio
radius of
curvature
radius of
curvature ratio
Notation
Units
ER
WR
WF2
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
dpool/dbkf
1.9
2.8
NA
NA
1.9
3.6
Wpool
feet
13.0
13.0
NA
NA
11.0
11.0
Wpool/Wbkf
1.3
1.3
NA
NA
1.2
1.2
K
1.30
NA
1.40
Wblt
feet
23
57
NA
NA
23
56
Wblt/Wbkf
2.7
6.5
NA
NA
2.7
6.5
LW
feet
79
121
NA
NA
66
120
LW/Wbkf
9.1
13.9
NA
NA
7.6
13.8
Lm
feet
93
146
NA
NA
73
135
Lm/Wbkf
10.7
16.8
NA
NA
8.4
15.5
Rc
feet
20
35
NA
NA
18
27
Rc/ Wbkf
2.3
4.0
NA
NA
2.1
3.1
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 4
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017

HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Deep Meadow Project Site
Union County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. John Hutton
Wildlands
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Prepared by:
SEER1, f
L
WS
1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Tel[phone]
to
1219
March 3, 2016

INTRODUCTION
Wildlands is investigating the feasibility of on-site stream and wetland mitigation within the Yadkin River
Subbasin. The study areas are located at 1812 McIntyre Road, Union County, NC. Three Oaks
Engineering (Three Oaks) has been retained to perform a Hydric Soil Investigation that describes and
classifies the soil throughout the study areas and to make a determination as to its hydric status.
There is a stream that generally bisects the site. It is primarily used for agriculture.
1� AolmaMno MGM
The field investigation was performed on February 26, 2016 by Michael Wood, LSS. Hand -turned soil
auger borings were advanced throughout the study areas. Each soil boring was classified based on soil
characteristics indicating the hydric soil status. Soil boring locations were located on a site map and are
shown on the attached figure. A representative soil boring is appended. Hydric soil status is based upon
the MRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the Unities States - A Guide for Identifying and Delineating
Hydric Soils (Version 7.0, 2010).
RESULTS
Twenty -Eight (28) soil borings were advanced throughout the study area (Figures 1). Soil borings were
placed into one of four general categories based on existing soil and site characteristics;
Hydric. — Borings rated as Hydric were visually saturated with low chroma color soil surfaces and
redoximorphic features. Borings rated as Hydric met criteria for soil indicator F3, depleted
matrix:
F3 Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or
less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
a. 5 cm (2 inches) if the 5 cm is entirely within the upper 15 cm (6 inches) of the soil, or
b. 15 cm (6 inches), starting within 25 cm (10 inches) of the soil surface.
Borings 6, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26, and 27 were considered Hydric.
Hydric over Hydric. — Borings rated as Hydric over Hydric exhibited obvious overburden material
overlying a buried hydric soil layer. The overburden material appeared to have originated from
current and past anthropogenic practices. The overburden material appears to have been in place
long enough that it has developed hydric indicators with clear evidence of active reduction and oxidation
reactions and ranged in depth from 17 to 27 inches. Generally, both the existing surface and buried
surface met indicator F3 Depleted Matrix or F6 Redox Dark Surface:
F6 Redox Dark Surface. A layer that is at least 10 cm (4 inches) thick, is entirely within the upper 30 cm
(12 inches) of the mineral soil, and has:
a. Matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 1 or less and 2 percent or more distinct or prominent
redox concentration occurring as soft masses or pore lining, or
Deep Meadow Hydric Soil Investigation March 03, 2016
Three Oaks' Job #4180 2

b. Matrix value of 3 or less and chroma of 2 or less and 5 percent or more distinct or prominent
redox concentrations occurring as soft masses or pore linings.
Soil borings 1 and 24 were considered Hydric over Hydric.
Non -Hydric over Hydric. — Borings rated as Non -Hydric over Hydric exhibited obvious overburden
material overlying a buried hydric soil layer. The overburden material appeared to have
originated from current and past anthropogenic practices and ranged in depth from 8 to 35
inches. The buried surface typically met indicator F3 Depleted Matrix or F6 Redox Dark Surface.
Soil borings 12, 20, and 22 were considered Non -Hydric over Hydric.
Non -Hydric. — Borings rated as Non -Hydric did not exhibit characteristics for hydric soil
indicators.
Borings 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 21, 23, and 28 were considered Non -Hydric.
Evidence of a current and historic wetland presence was noted within the "Good" Hydric Soil Unit and
consists of borings rated as Hydric and Hydric over Hydric (Figure 1). Evidence of historic wetland
presence was noted within the "Marginal" Hydric Soil Unit and consists of borings rated as Hydric and
Non -Hydric over Hydric. Combining hydraulic stream modifications with limited soil removal, if needed,
qualifies the Hydric Soil Unit as a candidate for Wetland Re-establishment and/or Re -habilitation
mitigation credit.
CONCLUSION
There is obvious evidence of soil manipulation within the majority of the study areas. Soil borings were
advanced and placed into one of the four categories; Hydric, Hydric over Hydric, Non -Hydric over Hydric,
and Non -Hydric. A "Good" Hydric Soil Unit consists of borings rated as Hydric and Hydric over Hydric soil
borings. A "Marginal" Hydric Soil Unit consists of borings rated as Hydric and Non -Hydric over Hydric
Combining hydraulic stream modifications with limited soil removal, if needed, qualifies both Hydric Soil
Units as a candidate for Wetland Re-establishment and/or Re -habilitation mitigation credit, although
alternative success criteria may need to be considered for each Unit.
The findings presented herein represent Three Oaks professional opinion based on our Hydric Soil
Investigation and knowledge of the current regulations regarding wetland mitigation in North Carolina
and national criteria for determining hydric soil.
Deep Meadow Hydric Soil Investigation March 03, 2016
Three Oaks' Job #4180 3

EERI*G f Prepared For:
(A73 4
WILDLAND
d
Hydric Soil Investigation
Deep Meadow Site
Union Country, North Carolina
Date: February 2016
Scale0 100 200 Feet
I I J
Job No.: 4180
Drawn By:
KMS
Checked By:
MW
M
B19 '
B21
O
B16
�•
B17 B20
B15
`r--
B14
B22 "
623
'
*
..ip
B1r26-
r
B24.
A
O O
B25
B11
t;
e 26
B10 O
O 0627
4'ra`'
69
C
B1
B2
"Ka"}
B7
OB8 B-
Zz
B4
�
• Soil Borings
r
Soil Units
= Good (5.1 ac)
B5
Marginal (4.3 ac)
Project Boundary
Project Stream
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Anal is;.NC
911 Board
EERI*G f Prepared For:
(A73 4
WILDLAND
d
Hydric Soil Investigation
Deep Meadow Site
Union Country, North Carolina
Date: February 2016
Scale0 100 200 Feet
I I J
Job No.: 4180
Drawn By:
KMS
Checked By:
MW
Figure

�Xt
SOIL EVALUATION FORM
Three Oaks Engineering
1000 Corporate Drive, Suite 101
Hillsborough, NC 27278
919.732,1300
Job: T)(w
County: J1q -v 11�
Date: Z (Z 4 f 1
Sheet:___of !
0
roTexture
X
0
O x
o
Structure /
Consistence /
Mineralogy
Matrix
Color
Mottle Colors
(Quantity, Size, Contrast, Color)
m/d,
J.
o/d' 1. ,
L�
AP
Na z�)P
Z. J3
-� 1,f i.5AK 516
T /%'w
57 41?,
n
�" r -%.r
15-2Ll
Z,5`1
�, , Q �,'� Y� q 4=, f : P 2.5 5iG
�n C,LF
iZ 1, 3
45Y5/1
1 p 7.5YK 4 f o
Evaluated by:

Deep Meadow Drainmod Model:Well 2 Calibration
25.0
3.5
-
Ilrl'II'�II1
11�1�
F::
G ro. nd Surface —Ground Surface
15.0
1 foot
—Mod led -DrainMOD
- 3.0
5.0
- 2.5
-5.0
- 2.0
CL
-15.0
a
o
;;
c�
a
-25.0
EL
.�
- 1.5
a
-35.0
- 1.0
-45.0
IL-
0.5
-55.0
-65.0 11111111
1 111
mi"m III 11 11 III
0.0
ds. ✓ cis. 1� � c�J, 1v, c? c�� ,I� � c�1 ,I� �? �� ,I1 1 �1 1� .�'� �� 9 �9 1�
cP, ��
'�G G/ '�Gj 94 P� `rta �� 2oG 20 �d d7 'ted P �d,, � 9,b �d � ✓� ✓� ��ij 9�do 9� fd
�<'� ��,
Date
�i ',
Ilrl'II'�II1
11�1�

20
10
0
-10
OJ v
-20
v
m
3 -30
-40
-50
-60
c> c on a +� > u c -0 > c on a +� > u
i
�m Q m �n O O D i Q :3a) O D
Q Z 9 7 Q vO Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

0
0
Deep Meadow Groundwater Gage #2 0
f6 n
i/1 O
20 °° N
c �
m
3 �
o m
10 O
0
-10
v
-20
30
-40
-50
-60 ii i i i i ■ uu u■ i q ■m ■ i i imu■ W. ■ ..■ i. F ■udiu■ .u.u. 1 ■ .i ■l. ui .Ill! 1iu.,1111 ■.i i
C a C on O. — > U c -0 a C W O_ + > U
CU '6 Q o n O 0 � �i Q m = v0)i O 0 a)
5 Q Z � Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 — — Criteria Level
3.0
2.5
2.0
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
N
C
O
N
O
W 0
m�
4.0
c o
o ti
0
3.5
-60 ii i i i i ■ uu u■ i q ■m ■ i i imu■ W. ■ ..■ i. F ■udiu■ .u.u. 1 ■ .i ■l. ui .Ill! 1iu.,1111 ■.i i
C a C on O. — > U c -0 a C W O_ + > U
CU '6 Q o n O 0 � �i Q m = v0)i O 0 a)
5 Q Z � Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 — — Criteria Level
3.0
2.5
2.0
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu m a)
-0 a C 75 on 0. a"• > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #3 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu
-0 a C 75 on CL a", > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #4 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu m a)
-0 a C 75 on 0. a"• > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #5 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu
-0 a C 75 on CL a"• > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu m a)
-0 a C 75 on 0. a"• > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #7 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(QCu m a)
-0 a C 75 on 0. a"• > U c -0a C W O_ �"• > U
LL g a g a V) O z o LL g a g a V) O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
w
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

20
10
0
-10
v
>
-20
v
m
-30
-40
-50
-60
(OCu m a)0 a)
-0 ? C 75 00 0. +' > U C -0 T C W O_ +-' > U
LL g ¢ g Q O Z o 9 LL g ¢ g Q Ln O z o
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth — — Criteria Level
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0 c
m
c
1.5 z
1.0
0.5
0.0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Date
Deep Meadow MitigationSite
97131
Pre -construction GW Gage Data
March 23 to November 6
Inches
Groundwater
Serial # 458468
Gauge ID: GWG 1
Offset: 0
Depth Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge ID:
Offset:
Depth
458364
GWG 2
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458470
GWG 3
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458448
GWG 4
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458462
GWG 5
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458443
GWG 6
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458366
GWG 7
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial #
Gauge
Offset:
Depth
458458
GWG 8
0
Q S
Groundwater
Serial # 458463
Gauge REF
Offset: 0
Depth Q S
6/24/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-53.00
-39.89
-52.86
-39.88
-51.39
-38.14
6/25/16 5:00 AM
-43.36
-53.25
-40.33
-53.00
-40.66
-51.67
-38.45
6/25/16 5:00 PM
43.22
-53.14
-40.11
-53.00
41.10
-51.45
-38.25
6/26/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.11
-40.14
-53.00
-42.10
-51.64
-38.45
6/26/16 5:00 PM
43.25
-52.92
-39.84
-53.00
41.99
-51.45
-38.17
6/27/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-42.79
-51.61
-38.45
6/27/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.75
-39.78
-52.94
42.76
-51.28
-38.06
6/28/16 5:00 AM
-43.33
-53.19
-40.28
-53.00
-43.76
-51.56
-38.42
6/28/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-53.06
-40.09
-53.00
44.40
-51.50
-38.34
6/29/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-45.23
-51.58
-38.42
6/29/16 5:00 PM
43.06
-52.86
-39.78
-52.81
45.70
-51.00
-37.98
6/30/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-42.71
-51.53
-38.45
6/30/16 5:00 PM
43.20
-53.03
-40.00
-52.89
43.90
-51.36
-38.20
7/1/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-46.06
-51.64
-38.56
7/1/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-53.03
-39.75
-52.94
46.44
-51.28
-38.22
7/2/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-46.50
-51.56
-38.36
7/2/16 5:00 PM
42.95
-52.95
-39.81
-52.83
46.00
-51.22
-37.95
7/3/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.22
-40.20
-53.00
-46.33
-51.56
-38.39
7/3/16 5:00 PM
43.00
-52.78
-39.73
-52.83
45.92
-51.22
-38.06
7/4/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.22
-40.25
-53.00
-46.25
-51.64
-38.47
7/4/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-53.00
-39.86
-53.00
46.03
-51.28
-38.25
7/5/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.22
-40.11
-53.00
-46.31
-51.56
-38.28
7/5/16 5:00 PM
42.81
-52.61
-39.59
-52.58
45.59
-50.98
-37.81
7/6/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.19
-40.14
-53.00
-46.17
-51.64
-38.39
7/6/16 5:00 PM
42.92
-52.70
-39.61
-52.67
-45.78
-51.03
-37.86
7/7/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-46.36
-51.75
-38.47
7/7/16 5:00 PM
42.84
-52.67
-39.64
-52.64
-45.72
-51.06
-37.64
7/8/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.20
-53.00
-46.17
-51.70
-38.39
7/8/16 5:00 PM
42.81
-52.59
-39.48
-52.58
-45.56
-50.95
-37.78
7/9/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.42
-53.00
-46.28
-51.81
-38.53
7/9/16 5:00 PM
42.92
-52.83
-39.67
-52.67
-45.86
-51.03
-37.98
7/10/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-46.20
-51.61
-38.45
7/10/16 5:00 PM
43.03
-52.70
-39.70
-52.75
-45.70
-51.14
-37.92
7/11/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.22
-40.09
-53.00
-46.25
-51.61
-38.47
7/11/16 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.22
-40.22
-53.00
-46.31
-51.70
-38.47
7/12/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.33
-1.04
-29.42
-39.27
-36.56
7/12/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-53.06
-39.97
-6.27
-33.24
-51.28
-38.20
7/13/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-34.62
-35.48
-51.83
-38.61
7/13/16 5:00 PM
43.03
-52.81
-39.75
-42.15
-35.95
-51.14
-38.03
7/14/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-46.72
-37.48
-51.53
-38.53
7/14/16 5:00 PM
42.92
-52.89
-39.73
48.57
-37.53
-51.11
-37.92
7/15/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.17
-50.73
-38.61
-51.53
-38.50
-37.50
7/15/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-51.84
-39.03
-51.72
-38.50
-37.50
7/16/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.20
-53.00
-39.11
-51.58
-38.42
-37.50
7/16/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-52.97
-39.84
-53.00
-39.19
-51.20
-38.14
-37.31
7/17/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-39.80
-51.56
-38.39
-37.50
7/17/16 5:00 PM
43.20
-53.11
-39.89
-53.00
-39.88
-51.34
-38.11
-37.44
7/18/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-40.55
-51.67
-38.53
-37.50
7/18/16 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.14
-40.03
-53.00
40.22
-51.47
-38.25
-37.33
7/19/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-40.82
-51.64
-38.47
-37.50
7/19/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.95
-39.84
-52.81
40.58
-51.28
-38.14
-37.28
7/20/16 5:00 AM
-43.39
-53.25
-40.25
-28.22
-34.29
-45.38
-38.39
-37.50
7/20/16 5:00 PM
43.06
-52.95
-40.03
-44.36
-36.06
-51.31
-38.17
-37.28
7/21/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-50.31
-37.48
-51.61
-38.56
-37.50
7/21/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-53.11
-40.03
-52.78
-37.86
-51.28
-38.14
-37.31
7/22/16 5:00 AM
-43.36
-53.14
-40.00
-53.00
-38.42
-51.39
-38.34
-37.39
7/22/16 5:00 PM
43.00
-52.97
-39.92
-53.00
-38.22
-51.17
-38.09
-37.31
7/23/16 5:00 AM
-43.25
-53.19
-39.97
-53.00
-38.83
-51.50
-38.34
-37.50
7/23/16 5:00 PM
43.28
-53.25
-40.00
-53.00
-39.27
-51.47
-38.31
-37.50
7/24/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-39.86
-51.58
-38.53
-37.50
7/24/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.83
-39.73
-52.94
-39.75
-51.17
-38.03
-37.31
7/25/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-40.60
-51.56
-38.39
-37.50
7/25/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.86
-39.67
-52.81
40.19
-51.11
-37.89
-37.08
7/26/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
41.41
-51.58
-38.42
-37.50
7/26/16 5:00 PM
42.97
-52.86
-39.75
-52.94
41.41
-51.22
-37.98
-37.17
7/27/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-42.49
-51.67
-38.61
-37.50
7/27/16 5:00 PM
42.72
-52.56
-39.45
-52.61
42.54
-50.95
-37.78
-36.97
7/28/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.19
-40.17
-53.00
-43.95
-51.53
-38.36
-37.50
7/28/16 5:00 PM
42.97
-52.86
-39.70
-52.83
44.12
-51.28
-37.84
-37.20
7/29/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-45.78
-51.64
-38.53
-37.50
7/29/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-52.97
-39.84
-52.92
45.92
-51.14
-38.09
-37.20
7/30/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.22
-40.14
-53.00
-46.39
-51.56
-38.39
-37.50
7/30/16 5:00 PM
43.28
-53.11
-40.00
-53.00
46.22
-51.36
-38.22
-37.42
7/31/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.19
-40.14
-53.00
-46.36
-51.67
-38.36
-37.50
7/31/16 5:00 PM
42.86
-52.61
-39.64
-52.70
45.81
-51.06
-37.78
-37.03
8/1/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.19
-40.11
-53.00
-46.44
-51.61
-38.45
-37.50
8/1/16 5:00 PM
43.17
-52.86
-39.86
-52.94
46.11
-51.31
-38.17
-37.20
8/2/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
40.17
-53.00
-31.44
-51.56
-38.45
-37.50
8/2/16 5:00 PM
43.20
-53.00
-39.97
-53.00
-34.51
-51.31
-38.17
-37.25
8/3/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.22
40.00
-53.00
-36.12
-51.45
-38.39
-37.39
8/3/16 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.06
-40.00
-53.00
-37.17
-51.34
-38.20
-37.42
8/4/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
40.20
-53.00
-37.97
-51.56
-38.34
-37.50

8/4/16 5:00 PM
43.25
-53.14
-40.00
-53.00
-38.33
-51.39
-38.22
-37.44
8/5/16 5:00 AM
-43.47
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-39.14
-51.56
-38.53
-37.50
8/5/16 5:00 PM
43.36
-53.17
-40.17
-53.00
-39.58
-51.58
-38.34
-37.50
8/6/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.11
-53.00
-39.97
-51.67
-38.53
-37.50
8/6/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-52.86
-39.81
-52.86
-39.86
-51.17
-38.09
-37.28
8/7/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-40.55
-51.64
-38.53
-37.50
8/7/16 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.17
-40.11
-53.00
-38.69
-51.56
-38.36
-37.50
8/8/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-49.68
-35.20
-51.61
-38.45
-37.50
8/8/16 5:00 PM
43.36
-53.14
-40.17
-53.00
-36.09
-51.42
-38.28
-37.47
8/9/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-52.47
-39.26
-4.33
-24.35
-46.41
-32.99
-18.23
8/9/16 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.11
-40.09
-6.32
-29.78
-51.39
-37.67
-37.50
8/10/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-31.07
-31.33
-51.61
-38.67
-37.50
8/10/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.22
-40.09
-31.99
-26.10
-51.50
-38.31
-37.50
8/11/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.14
-38.80
-28.78
-51.56
-38.42
-37.50
8/11/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-52.95
-39.84
40.51
-29.59
-51.28
-38.00
-37.22
8/12/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.20
-42.92
-30.50
-51.58
-38.47
-37.50
8/12/16 5:00 PM
43.17
-52.86
-39.78
44.42
-30.53
-51.25
-38.17
-37.25
8/13/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.20
-47.10
-31.44
-51.64
-38.50
-37.50
8/13/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-53.06
-39.84
48.18
-31.50
-51.25
-38.09
-37.31
8/14/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.11
-49.93
-32.22
-51.64
-38.42
-37.50
8/14/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.89
-39.73
-50.95
-32.22
-51.20
-37.89
-37.08
8/15/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.31
-52.36
-32.99
-51.58
-38.45
-37.50
8/15/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-52.97
-39.95
-52.61
-32.82
-51.17
-38.17
-37.25
8/16/16 5:00 AM
-43.39
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-33.71
-51.53
-38.39
-37.50
8/16/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-53.14
-39.89
-52.78
-33.52
-51.25
-38.09
-37.36
8/17/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-34.40
-51.64
-38.56
-37.50
8/17/16 5:00 PM
43.11
-53.06
-39.89
-52.86
-34.21
-51.22
-38.14
-37.14
8/18/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-35.09
-51.67
-38.50
-37.50
8/18/16 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.14
-39.97
-53.00
-35.20
-51.42
-38.25
-37.50
8/19/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-35.73
-51.64
-38.45
-37.50
8/19/16 5:00 PM
43.22
-53.17
-39.92
-53.00
-35.54
-51.34
-38.22
-37.33
8/20/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-36.31
-51.56
-38.45
-37.50
8/20/16 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.00
-40.00
-53.00
-36.26
-51.28
-38.28
-37.44
8/21/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.00
-53.00
-36.53
-51.47
-38.31
-37.33
8/21/16 5:00 PM
43.28
-52.92
-39.78
-53.00
-36.67
-51.31
-38.09
-37.22
8/22/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-37.56
-51.56
-38.47
-37.50
8/22/16 5:00 PM
43.36
-53.25
-40.11
-53.00
-37.72
-51.56
-38.36
-37.50
8/23/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.17
-53.00
-38.31
-51.56
-38.45
-37.50
8/23/16 5:00 PM
43.47
-53.25
-40.17
-53.00
-38.67
-51.50
-38.36
-37.50
8/24/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-39.00
-51.72
-38.58
-37.50
8/24/16 5:00 PM
43.14
-53.11
-39.95
-52.94
-38.83
-51.31
-38.11
-37.31
8/25/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-39.61
-51.56
-38.58
-37.50
8/25/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.83
-39.73
-52.72
-39.19
-51.14
-38.06
-37.14
8/26/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.20
-53.00
-40.08
-51.64
-38.53
-37.50
8/26/16 5:00 PM
43.36
-53.17
-40.17
-53.00
-39.94
-51.45
-38.36
-37.50
8/27/16 5:00 AM
-43.36
-53.25
-40.14
-53.00
-40.27
-51.53
-38.39
-37.50
8/27/16 5:00 PM
42.78
-52.56
-39.53
-52.70
-39.99
-50.84
-37.89
-36.81
8/28/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-40.66
-51.58
-38.50
-37.50
8/28/16 5:00 PM
43.20
-53.19
-40.03
-53.00
40.55
-51.47
-38.34
-37.08
8/29/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-40.88
-51.70
-38.64
-37.50
8/29/16 5:00 PM
43.28
-53.25
-40.03
-53.00
40.60
-51.50
-38.28
-37.50
8/30/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-41.18
-51.61
-38.50
-37.50
8/30/16 5:00 PM
43.28
-53.00
-39.95
-52.97
40.99
-51.45
-38.17
-37.22
8/31/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-53.00
-41.41
-51.70
-38.58
-37.50
8/31/16 5:00 PM
43.39
-53.25
-40.06
-53.00
41.02
-51.61
-38.45
-37.42
9/1/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-53.00
-41.68
-51.81
-38.64
-37.50
9/1/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-53.00
-39.84
-53.00
41.32
-51.22
-38.14
-37.28
9/2/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-53.00
-34.01
-51.75
-38.72
-37.50
9/2/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-7.60
-23.63
-20.11
-30.72
-34.29
9/3/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-2.17
-21.34
-39.21
-19.15
-4.50
9/3/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-4.25
-22.61
-51.94
-23.19
-27.28
9/4/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-28.91
-22.89
-52.00
-26.74
-34.76
9/4/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-31.27
-22.47
-52.00
-29.01
-37.50
9/5/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-33.76
-22.66
-52.00
-30.78
-37.50
9/5/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-35.59
-22.39
-52.00
-32.11
-37.50
9/6/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-37.52
-22.61
-52.00
-32.91
-37.50
9/6/16 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.25
-40.14
-39.02
-22.77
-52.00
-33.10
-37.50
9/7/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-40.90
-23.00
-52.00
-33.93
-37.50
9/7/16 5:00 PM
43.08
-52.97
-39.89
41.76
-22.64
-51.53
-33.71
-37.31
9/8/16 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.33
-43.09
-23.36
-52.00
-34.32
-37.50
9/8/16 5:00 PM
43.20
-52.86
-39.86
-43.56
-23.25
-51.67
-34.24
-37.36
9/9/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.11
-44.61
-23.99
-51.97
-34.60
-37.50
9/9/16 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.08
-40.03
-45.36
-24.16
-51.72
-34.71
-37.36
9/10/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-46.30
-24.80
-51.86
-35.04
-37.50
9/10/16 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.17
-40.11
46.83
-24.88
-51.97
-35.21
-37.50
9/11/16 5:00 AM
-43.31
-53.25
-40.25
-47.38
-25.43
-52.00
-35.48
-37.50
9/11/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.14
-39.97
48.04
-25.49
-51.97
-35.62
-37.42
9/12/16 5:00 AM
-43.36
-53.22
-40.11
-48.65
-26.01
-51.75
-36.04
-37.47
9/12/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.42
49.59
-26.60
-51.97
-36.45
-37.50
9/13/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-50.09
-27.04
-52.00
-36.73
-37.50
9/13/16 5:00 PM
43.39
-53.25
-40.17
49.82
-26.18
-51.94
-36.62
-37.50
9/14/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.20
-50.31
-26.93
-52.00
-36.84
-37.50
9/14/16 5:00 PM
43.25
-53.14
-39.92
49.82
-26.79
-51.75
-36.76
-37.47
9/15/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.31
-50.29
-27.45
-51.86
-37.23
-37.50
9/15/16 5:00 PM
43.25
-53.17
40.03
-50.07
-27.48
-51.72
-37.01
-37.39
9/16/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.39
-51.09
-28.51
-52.00
-37.64
-37.50
9/16/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.20
-51.39
-28.42
-51.86
-37.73
-37.50
9/17/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.28
-51.86
-29.03
-51.97
-38.06
-37.50
9/17/16 5:00 PM
43.47
-53.22
40.11
-51.34
-28.92
-51.97
-38.14
-37.50
9/18/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.42
-51.48
-29.59
-52.00
-38.50
-37.50
9/18/16 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.25
40.22
-50.79
-29.56
-51.94
-38.53
-37.50
9/19/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.33
-50.67
-29.83
-52.00
-38.70
-37.50
9/19/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.28
-50.92
-30.14
-52.00
-38.64
-37.50
9/20/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-51.59
-30.53
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50

9/20/16 5:00 PM
43.47
-53.22
-40.20
-51.98
-30.75
-51.94
-38.78
-37.44
9/21/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-52.34
-31.00
-52.00
-38.72
-37.50
9/21/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-52.58
-31.30
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
9/22/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-52.75
-31.41
-51.75
-38.94
-37.50
9/22/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.45
-52.86
-31.38
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
9/23/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.45
-53.00
-31.22
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
9/23/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-53.00
-30.75
-52.00
-38.56
-37.50
9/24/16 5:00 AM
-43.44
-53.25
-40.31
-53.00
-30.33
-52.00
-38.89
-37.50
9/24/16 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.06
-39.95
-53.00
-29.75
-51.78
-38.39
-37.44
9/25/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-53.00
-29.97
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
9/25/16 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.11
-40.17
-53.00
-29.50
-52.00
-38.42
-37.50
9/26/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-53.00
-29.67
-51.78
-39.00
-37.50
9/26/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-29.28
-52.00
-38.81
-37.50
9/27/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-29.31
-52.00
-38.81
-37.50
9/27/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.22
-53.00
-28.53
-51.94
-38.64
-37.50
9/28/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-53.00
-28.45
-52.00
-38.39
-37.50
9/28/16 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.08
-40.31
-53.00
-28.03
-52.00
-37.67
-37.50
9/29/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.53
-3.20
-2.04
-48.90
-4.31
-7.19
9/29/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-3.78
-3.34
-52.00
-7.72
-25.40
9/30/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-4.47
-4.36
-52.00
-11.09
-30.97
9/30/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-6.05
-6.05
-52.00
-14.97
-34.12
10/1/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.19
-40.42
-11.81
-8.77
-52.00
-19.90
-36.56
10/1/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.22
-40.36
-14.88
-10.29
-52.00
-23.00
-37.50
10/2/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.64
-18.67
-12.17
-52.00
-25.52
-37.50
10/2/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.45
-20.94
-12.67
-52.00
-26.60
-37.50
10/3/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-23.32
-13.50
-52.00
-27.43
-37.50
10/3/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.45
-25.29
-14.41
-52.00
-28.29
-37.50
10/4/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-27.25
-15.58
-52.00
-29.23
-37.50
10/4/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.53
-28.91
-16.32
-51.97
-30.03
-37.50
10/5/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-30.27
-17.21
-52.00
-30.50
-37.50
10/5/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.58
-31.63
-17.99
-52.00
-31.19
-37.50
10/6/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-32.46
-18.54
-52.00
-31.61
-37.50
10/6/16 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.47
-33.21
-18.76
-52.00
-31.89
-37.50
10/7/16 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.42
-33.32
-18.93
-52.00
-32.02
-37.50
10/7/16 5:00 PM
-15.51
-14.85
-37.07
-0.40
-1.68
-33.45
-8.35
-1.29
10/8/16 5:00 AM
-2.58
-2.70
-1.99
0.85
7.51
-8.62
-3.09
-0.13
10/8/16 5:00 PM
16.93
13.33
9.83
14.91
32.70
14.39
23.21
29.91
10/9/16 5:00 AM
-3.99
-3.47
-3.79
0.85
-0.74
-5.38
-1.63
-0.24
10/9/16 5:00 PM
-7.26
4.89
-6.20
0.21
-1.15
-10.89
-5.00
-0.54
10/10/16 5:00 AM
-9.89
-6.44
-9.22
-0.04
-1.49
-12.88
-7.94
-1.10
10/10/16 5:00 PM
-12.36
-7.35
-11.57
-0.40
-1.85
-13.77
-9.32
-1.84
10/11/16 5:00 AM
-15.12
-9.32
-14.95
-0.43
-1.73
-16.07
-11.15
-4.28
10/11/16 5:00 PM
-17.34
-10.48
-17.05
-0.79
-1.85
-16.48
-12.42
-6.00
10/12/16 5:00 AM
-19.30
-12.14
-19.24
-0.76
-1.57
-17.62
-13.95
-7.60
10/12/16 5:00 PM
-20.91
-13.47
-20.87
-0.98
-1.54
-17.75
-14.58
-9.54
10/13/16 5:00 AM
-22.02
-14.60
-22.23
-0.90 M
-1.60
-18.50
-15.58
-11.03
10/13/16 5:00 PM
-23.40
-15.85
-23.84
-1.26 M
-1.76
-18.89
-16.41
-12.86
10/14/16 5:00 AM
-24.70
-17.26
-25.25
-1.54 M
-2.37
-20.58
-18.07
-14.63
10/14/16 5:00 PM
-25.67
-18.42
-26.41
-1.67 M
-2.15
-21.02
-18.68
-16.32
10/15/16 5:00 AM
-26.72
-19.59
-27.41
-1.90 M
-2.40
-21.58
-19.48
-17.43
10/15/16 5:00 PM
-27.61
-20.72
-28.46
-2.34 M
-2.29
-21.80
-19.68
-18.70
10/16/16 5:00 AM
-28.33
-21.47
-29.15
-2.50 M
-2.40
-21.96
-20.17
-19.28
10/16/16 5:00 PM
-28.99
-22.05
-29.65
-2.92 M
-2.04
-21.74
-19.95
-20.03
10/17/16 5:00 AM
-29.74
-22.83
-30.34
-3.42 M
-2.79
-22.41
-20.53
-20.64
10/17/16 5:00 PM
-30.29
-23.27
-30.81
-3.89 M
-2.40
-22.43
-20.48
-21.03
10/18/16 5:00 AM
-30.99
-24.24
-31.53
-4.72 M
-3.40
-23.71
-21.31
-21.91
10/18/16 5:00 PM
-31.49
-24.79
-32.14
-5.25 M
-3.04
-23.98
-21.73
-22.52
10/19/16 5:00 AM
-32.23
-25.51
-32.97
-6.49 M
-3.95
-24.95
-22.47
-22.99
10/19/16 5:00 PM
-32.76
-26.01
-33.47
-8.68 M
-3.81
-25.20
-22.61
-23.46
10/20/16 5:00 AM
-33.31
-26.84
-34.16
-10.51 M
-4.39
-25.76
-23.03
-24.18
10/20/16 5:00 PM
-33.87
-27.25
-34.71
-11.58 M
-4.25
-25.56
-23.05
-24.68
10/21/16 5:00 AM
-34.39
-27.78
-35.30
-12.83 M
-3.98
-25.64
-23.28
-25.15
10/21/16 5:00 PM
-34.81
-28.03
-35.68
-13.80 M
-4.56
-26.28
-23.39
-25.46
10/22/16 5:00 AM
-35.25
-28.97
-36.46
-17.07 M
-7.24
-27.89
-24.83
-26.01
10/22/16 5:00 PM
-35.75
-29.75
-37.18
-19.50 M
-8.77
-28.99
-25.82
-26.68
10/23/16 5:00 AM
-36.52
-31.10
-38.23
-22.58 M
-11.51
-30.93
-27.40
-27.73
10/23/16 5:00 PM
-36.83
-31.79
-38.87
-23.30 M
-11.29
-30.68
-27.59
-28.23
10/24/16 5:00 AM
-37.10
-32.49
-39.37
-23.74 M
-11.45
-31.10
-27.70
-28.75
10/24/16 5:00 PM
-37.30
-32.90
-39.81
-23.93 M
-10.98
-31.15
-27.65
-29.03
10/25/16 5:00 AM
-37.94
-33.79
-40.33
-25.57 M
-12.70
-32.59
-28.54
-29.75
10/25/16 5:00 PM
-38.13
-34.48
-40.75
-26.28 M
-12.64
-32.73
-28.92
-30.33
10/26/16 5:00 AM
-38.74
-35.23
-40.75
-27.28 M
-13.81
-33.65
-29.53
-31.13
10/26/16 5:00 PM
-39.02
-35.56
-40.67
-27.48 M
-13.31
-33.48
-29.56
-31.49
10/27/16 5:00 AM
-39.29
-36.25
-40.75
-27.86 M
-13.69
-33.87
-29.92
-31.94
10/27/16 5:00 PM
-38.79
-36.06
-40.50
-27.48 M
-12.37
-33.42
-29.01
-32.10
10/28/16 5:00 AM
-39.35
-36.72
-40.56
-27.53 M
-12.12
-33.81
-29.23
-32.66
10/28/16 5:00 PM
-39.68
-37.08
-40.69
-27.97 M
-11.90
-33.98
-29.42
-33.04
10/29/16 5:00 AM
-40.04
-37.53
-40.58
-28.86 M
-13.17
-34.78
-29.89
-33.43
10/29/16 5:00 PM
40.15
-37.72
-40.47
-28.72 M
-12.03
-34.12
-29.62
-33.60
30/30/164:00 AM
-40.81
-38.11
-40.67
-29.05 M
-12.61
-34.97
-29.95
-34.18
10/30/16 4:00 PM
40.95
-38.38
-40.47
-28.86 M
-11.78
-34.56
-29.70
-34.43
30/31/164:00 AM
-41.37
-38.66
-40.50
-29.39 M
-12.86
-35.31
-30.06
-34.70
10/31/16 4:00 PM
41.20
-39.13
-40.64
-30.47 M
-13.25
-35.94
-30.61
-35.12
11/1/164:00 AM
-41.65
-39.46
-40.58
-31.49 M
-14.25
-37.00
-31.05
-35.53
11/1/16 4:00 PM
42.25
-39.85
-40.47
-32.18 M
-13.56
-37.02
-31.30
-36.03
11/2/164:00 AM
-42.17
-40.07
-40.53
-32.62 M
-14.19
-37.52
-31.47
-36.34
11/2/16 4:00 PM
42.48
-40.29
40.33
-32.46 M
-13.22
-37.13
-31.28
-36.75
11/3/164:00 AM
-43.00
-40.54
40.45
-32.43 M
-13.31
-37.22
-31.19
-36.95
11/3/16 4:00 PM
43.06
-40.79
-40.42
-32.07 M
-12.50
-37.05
-31.08
-37.06
11/4/164:00 AM
-42.89
-40.99
-40.47
-31.96 M
-12.73
-37.24
-31.00
-37.39
11/4/164 :00 PM
-43.44
-41.43
-40.64
-33.48 R
-14.22
-38.46
-32.02
-37.50
11/5/164:00 AM
-43.50
-42.04
-40.75
-34.95
-15.96
-39.51
-32.69
-37.50
11/5/164 :00 PMJ
-43.50
-41.98
-40.64
-35.23
-15.94
-39.29
-32.74
-37.50
11/6/164:00 AM
-43.50
-42.67
-40.75
-35.84
-16.74
-40.01
-33.19
-37.50

11/6/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-42.76
-40.75
-35.84
-16.52
-39.99
-33.19
-37.50
11/7/164:00 AM
-43.50
-43.09
-40.75
-36.61
-17.46
-40.76
-33.63
-37.50
11/7/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-43.42
-40.75
-37.14
-17.15
-40.90
-33.77
-37.50
11/8/164:00 AM
-43.50
-43.87
-40.75
-37.47
-17.54
-41.20
-33.99
-37.50
11/8/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-43.84
-40.75
-36.86
-16.55
-40.79
-33.55
-37.50
11/9/164:00 AM
-43.50
-44.00
-40.67
-36.25
-15.63
-40.79
-33.21
-37.50
11/9/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-44.25
-40.75
-36.39
-15.52
-41.01
-33.24
-37.50
11/10/164:00 AM
-43.50
-44.81
-40.75
-38.27
-17.49
-42.34
-34.29
-37.50
11/10/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-44.83
-40.47
-38.58
-17.15
-42.34
-34.16
-37.50
11/11/164:00 AM
-43.50
-45.25
-40.50
-38.36
-17.10
-42.48
-34.07
-37.50
11/11/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-45.25
-40.75
-38.11
-16.93
-42.67
-33.96
-37.50
11/12/164:00 AM
-43.50
-45.61
-40.75
-39.88
-18.68
-43.67
-34.85
-37.50
11/12/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-45.83
-40.69
-41.12
-18.48
-44.22
-35.07
-37.50
11/13/164:00 AM
-43.50
-46.44
-40.75
-41.84
-19.09
-44.91
-35.51
-37.50
11/13/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-46.47
-40.75
41.18
-18.12
-44.25
-35.12
-37.50
11/14/164:00 AM
-43.50
-46.63
-40.75
-40.43
-16.41
-43.83
-34.82
-37.50
11/14/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-46.80
-40.75
-39.93
-15.27
-43.89
-34.49
-37.50
11/15/164:00 AM
-43.50
-46.91
-40.75
-40.04
-14.66
-44.30
-34.40
-37.50
11/15/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-47.02
-40.75
-39.93
-13.97
-44.33
-34.27
-37.50
11/16/164:00 AM
-43.50
-47.55
-40.75
-40.43
-14.66
-44.86
-34.38
-37.50
11/16/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-47.49
-40.75
40.65
-14.50
-44.94
-34.32
-37.50
11/17/164:00 AM
-43.50
-47.80
-40.75
41.68
-15.44
-45.38
-34.96
-37.50
11/17/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-47.74
-40.75
42.12
-15.38
-45.52
-34.99
-37.50
11/18/164:00 AM
-43.50
-47.99
-40.75
-42.90
-16.10
-45.91
-35.43
-37.50
11/18/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-48.02
-40.67
42.76
-15.36
-45.77
-35.21
-37.50
11/19/164:00 AM
-43.50
-48.32
-40.75
-42.56
-15.27
-45.83
-35.04
-37.50
11/19/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-49.37
-40.75
42.48
-15.85
-46.27
-35.37
-37.50
11/20/164:00 AM
-43.50
-48.82
-40.75
42.81
-16.80
-46.19
-35.65
-37.50
11/20/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-50.32
-40.75
-44.20
-18.15
-47.65
-36.92
-37.50
11/21/164:00 AM
-43.50
-49.51
-40.75
-43.28
-17.90
-46.85
-36.01
-37.50
11/21/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-49.90
-40.75
-43.89
-18.65
-47.40
-36.56
-37.50
11/22/164:00 AM
-43.50
-49.71
-40.75
-44.25
-19.26
-47.52
-36.48
-37.50
11/22/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-49.46
-40.75
-44.58
-18.76
-47.38
-36.43
-37.50
11/23/164:00 AM
-43.50
-49.93
-40.75
-45.39
-19.62
-48.01
-36.98
-37.50
11/23/16 4:00 PM
43.39
-49.21
-40.20
-44.33
-17.93
-47.16
-35.84
-37.50
11/24/164:00 AM
-43.50
-49.90
40.61
-44.61
-17.90
-47.74
-36.29
-37.50
11/24/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-49.96
40.56
-44.25
-17.13
-47.71
-36.15
-37.50
11/25/164:00 AM
-43.50
-50.23
40.69
-44.67
-17.21
-48.07
-36.43
-37.50
11/25/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-50.34
40.75
-44.33
-16.30
-48.01
-36.18
-37.50
11/26/164:00 AM
-43.50
-50.54
40.67
-44.33
-16.60
-48.26
-36.18
-37.50
11/26/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-50.79
40.69
-44.94
-17.46
-48.51
-36.70
-37.50
11/27/164:00 AM
-43.50
-51.34
40.75
-45.91
-18.98
-49.31
-37.20
-37.50
11/27/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-50.92
40.75
45.41
-18.21
-49.09
-36.79
-37.50
11/28/164:00 AM
-43.50
-51.51
40.75
-45.33
-18.59
-49.15
-37.17
-37.50
11/28/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-51.34
40.72
-44.47
-17.46
-48.71
-36.54
-37.50
11/29/164:00 AM
-43.50
-51.42
40.64
-43.53
-16.68
-48.43
-36.29
-37.50
11/29/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-51.40
40.50
-43.26
-15.94
-48.62
-36.18
-37.50
11/30/164:00 AM
-43.50
-51.73
40.64
-43.89
-15.05
-49.04
-36.51
-37.50
11/30/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-51.64
40.45
-43.14
-13.25
-48.65
-35.95
-37.50
12/1/164:00 AM
-43.50
-51.81
40.75
-43.03
-7.60
-48.68
-35.62
-37.50
12/1/16 4:00 PM
43.08
-51.28
-39.75
-43.26
-7.13
-48.35
-34.96
-37.22
12/2/164:00 AM
-43.50
-52.70
40.75
-45.61
-10.59
-50.01
-36.59
-37.50
12/2/16 4:00 PM
42.23
-50.62
-39.01
-44.20
-8.96
-48.15
-34.32
-36.31
12/3/164:00 AM
-43.50
-52.78
40.75
-46.74
-12.39
-50.39
-36.51
-37.50
12/3/16 4:00 PM
42.64
-51.09
-39.39
-44.97
-10.68
-48.71
-34.74
-36.70
12/4/164:00 AM
-43.50
-52.61
40.75
-46.33
-12.25
-50.17
-35.90
-37.50
12/4/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-52.81
40.75
46.13
-9.65
-50.15
-35.84
-37.50
12/5/164:00 AM
-43.50
-52.89
40.75
-36.89
-1.82
-49.65
-33.30
-37.50
12/5/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-52.72
40.64
-34.23
-1.65
-49.20
-24.94
-37.50
12/6/164:00 AM
-43.50
-53.11
40.75
-30.38
-1.35
-48.35
-25.35
-37.50
12/6/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-53.03
40.75
-2.75
-1.07
-35.39
-20.51
-37.50
12/7/164:00 AM
-43.50
-48.54
40.75
-3.81
-1.90
-36.52
-18.74
-37.50
12/7/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-43.81
40.69
-3.86
-1.21
-32.59
-18.13
-37.50
12/8/164:00 AM
-43.50
-41.73
40.75
-5.74
-1.79
-30.63
-19.46
-37.50
12/8/16 4:00 PM
42.50
-37.77
-39.42
-6.27
-0.57
-29.19
-18.93
-36.67
12/9/164:00 AM
-43.50
-38.08
-40.75
-14.35
-3.17
-31.98
-22.50
-37.50
12/9/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-36.09
-40.36
-15.88
-2.98
-31.65
-23.05
-37.50
12/10/164:00 AM
-43.50
-36.94
-40.75
-19.23
-5.14
-33.92
-25.74
-37.50
12/10/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-35.37
-40.42
-18.87
-3.48
-32.34
-25.05
-37.50
12/11/164:00 AM
-43.50
-36.17
-40.75
-21.16
-5.80
-33.98
-27.07
-37.50
12/11/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.92
-40.75
-20.75
-3.56
-32.46
-26.10
-37.50
12/12/164:00 AM
-43.50
-34.92
-40.75
-19.70
-2.40
-31.76
-25.63
-37.50
12/12/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.40
-40.75
-18.87
-2.18
-31.21
-24.96
-37.50
12/13/164:00 AM
-43.50
-34.56
-40.75
-21.30
-3.15
-33.15
-26.54
-37.50
12/13/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.01
-40.75
-21.30
-2.09
-32.46
-25.91
-37.50
12/14/164:00 AM
-43.50
-34.37
-40.75
-22.13
-2.54
-32.98
-26.46
-37.50
12/14/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-33.46
-40.36
-22.02
-1.93
-32.40
-25.57
-37.50
12/15/164:00 AM
-43.50
-34.42
-40.75
-23.41
-3.42
-33.23
-26.68
-37.50
12/15/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.51
-40.75
-24.76
4.81
-34.25
-27.48
-37.50
12/16/164:00 AM
-43.50
-36.14
-40.75
-28.22
-7.80
-36.55
-29.84
-37.50
12/16/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.65
-40.67
-26.76
-5.47
-34.42
-27.84
-37.50
12/17/164:00 AM
-43.50
-35.56
-40.75
-26.78
-5.61
-34.25
-27.90
-37.50
12/17/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-35.06
40.75
-25.68
4.25
-33.23
-26.96
-37.50
12/18/164:00 AM
-43.50
-34.81
-40.75
-25.59
-3.56
-33.20
-26.65
-37.50
12/18/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-34.90
-40.75
-21.52
-1.18
-33.92
-26.87
-37.50
12/19/164:00 AM
-43.50
-35.45
-40.75
-2.73
-0.46
-27.25
-18.54
-34.95
12/19/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-26.51
-40.75
-2.67
-0.77
-12.99
-12.01
-31.02
12/20/164:00 AM
-43.50
-17.70
-40.67
-2.45
-0.49
-13.33
-11.15
-30.58
12/20/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-15.77
-40.50
-2.62
-0.41
-13.08
-11.26
-29.14
12/21/164:00 AM
-43.50
-16.76
-37.15
-4.30
-1.71
-14.07
-13.78
-28.67
12/21/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-16.40
-32.75
-3.58
-0.74
-13.91
-13.70
-26.32
12/22/164:00 AM
-43.50
-17.65
-31.70
-4.89
-1.46
-15.46
-15.27
-26.04
12/22/164 :00 PM
43.50
-17.51
-30.34
-4.75
-0.90
-15.43
-15.41
-24.82
12/23/164:00 AM
-43.50
-19.50
-31.64
-7.18
-2.29
-19.44
-18.76
-25.51

12/23/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-19.81
-31.37
-9.37
-1.38
-19.72
-18.62
-25.10
12/24/164:00 AM
-43.50
-20.58
-31.56
-10.09
-1.15
-19.72
-18.96
-25.37
12/24/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-20.58
-31.56
-10.28
-0.96
-19.58
-19.01
-25.13
12/25/164:00 AM
-43.50
-21.52
-32.25
-12.19
-1.54
-21.19
-20.40
-25.54
12/25/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-21.97
-32.53
-13.22
-1.35
-21.94
-20.76
-25.60
12/26/164:00 AM
-43.50
-22.94
-33.28
-15.02
-1.79
-23.32
-21.92
-26.20
12/26/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-23.21
-33.36
-14.96
-1.32
-22.60
-21.42
-26.01
12/27/164:00 AM
-43.50
-23.66
-33.75
-14.69
-0.88
-22.02
-21.03
-26.40
12/27/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-23.19
-33.47
-13.91
-0.52
-20.94
-20.26
-26.04
12/28/164:00 AM
-43.50
-23.96
-33.94
-15.90
-1.26
-22.54
-21.56
-26.40
12/28/16 4:00 PM
43.36
-23.68
-33.64
-16.46
-0.88
-22.57
-21.39
-25.90
12/29/164:00 AM
-43.50
-24.74
-34.66
-17.48
-0.82
-22.85
-21.84
-26.65
12/29/16 4:00 PM
43.50
4.91
-11.27
-0.82
-0.07
-7.29
-8.41
-1.84
12/30/164:00 AM
-43.50
-6.66
-14.23
-1.78
-0.74
-7.26
-10.01
-4.94
12/30/16 4:00 PM
43.50
-6.91
-15.00
-0.87
-0.16
-8.84
-10.10
-6.58
12/31/164:00 AM
-43.50
-9.68
-18.80
-2.67
-1.65
-11.89
-13.28
-10.37
12/31/16 4:00 PM
43.06
-8.15
-17.86
-0.82
0.59
-10.00
-11.84
-9.68
1/1/17 4:00 AM
-43.50
-10.12
-19.93
-2.12
-0.60
-11.78
-13.89
-11.67
1/1/17 4:00 PM
43.50
-8.01
-19.60
-2.03
-0.18
-9.98
-11.93
-11.70
1/2/17 4:00 AM
-43.50
-3.06
-3.40
-0.46
0.37
-4.19
-7.97
-1.43
1/2/17 4:00 PM
-3.86
-3.86
-3.07
0.13
0.56
-3.05
-2.32
-0.76
1/3/17 4:00 AM
-2.64
-2.87
-1.80
0.60
1.81
-2.09
-3.07
-0.38
1/3/17 4:00 PM
-3.44
-3.61
-2.99
0.29
0.87
-2.22
-1.77
-0.65
1/4/17 4:00 AM
-3.91
-3.92
-3.76
0.24
0.92
-2.64
-4.37
-0.93
1/4/17 4:00 PM
-3.28
-2.98
-3.04
1.54
1.86
-2.28
-4.62
-0.10
1/5/17 4:00 AM
-5.66
-5.05
-5.48
0.04
0.62
-3.69
-7.19
-1.73
1/5/17 4:00 PM
-4.88
4.03
4.73
1.43
2.11
-2.11
-6.06
-0.40
1/6/17 4:00 AM
-5.99
-4.91
-5.95
0.43
1.01
-2.89
-7.72
-1.29
1/6/17 4:00 PM
-6.71
-5.77
-7.14
0.35
0.54
-3.53
-8.69
-1.79
1/7/17 4:00 AM
-2.25
-2.34
-1.08
0.85
1.17
-2.47
-3.45
-0.54
1/7/17 4:00 PM
-2.80
-3.11
-2.05
0.26
0.40
-3.14
-2.57
-1.23
1/8/17 4:00 AM
-4.94
4.69
4.65
-0.51
-0.79
4.38
-5.70
-2.01
1/8/17 4:00 PM
-4.33
4.17
-3.74
0.13
-0.02
-3.47
-5.39
-1.40
1/9/17 4:00 AM
-7.04
-6.30
-6.62
-1.09
-1.60
4.94
-8.60
-2.89
1/9/17 4:00 PM
-4.94
4.53
4.51
0.15
0.34
-2.92
-6.53
-1.70
1/10/174:00 AM
-5.79
-5.08
-5.84
-0.35
-0.30
-3.44
-7.77
-2.06
1/10/17 4:00 PM
-4.02
-3.00
-3.99
1.45
1.61
-1.31
-5.50
-0.29
1/11/174:00 AM
-5.63
-4.66
-5.84
0.26
0.37
-3.08
-7.94
-1.59
1/11/17 4:00 PM
-4.55
4.11
-5.48
0.62
0.54
-2.61
-7.14
-1.15
1/12/174:00 AM
-4.94
-4.69
-6.03
0.40
0.45
-2.94
-8.13
-1.59
1/12/17 4:00 PM
-5.07
4.75
-6.06
1.09
1.25
-2.28
-7.83
-0.93
1/13/174:00 AM
-6.38
-5.77
-7.36
0.35
0.51
-3.14
-9.27
-2.01
1/13/17 4:00 PM
-5.91
-5.55
-7.25
0.96
1.28
-2.25
-8.55
-1.82
1/14/174:00 AM
-7.15
-6.80
-8.86
0.18
0.65
-3.14
-9.90
-3.92
1/14/17 4:00 PM
-6.90
-6.66
-8.89
0.82
1.31
-2.06
-8.52
4.33
1/15/174:00 AM
-8.40
-7.99
-10.41
-0.21
0.42
-2.94
-10.51
-6.33
1/15/17 4:00 PM
-8.06
-8.15
-10.41
0.26
1.09
-2.61
-10.13
-6.49
1/16/174:00 AM
-9.06
-9.15
-11.71
-0.15
0.76
-3.44
-11.23
-8.18
1/16/17 4:00 PM
-9.31
-9.68
-12.10
-0.07
0.84
-2.89
-10.87
-8.96
1/17/174:00 AM
-9.89
-9.95
-12.68
-0.40
0.76
-2.86
-11.15
-9.76
1/17/17 4:00 PM
-9.45
-9.87
-12.46
-0.23
1.20
-2.42
-10.15
-9.73
1/18/174:00 AM
-9.42
-9.70
-12.57
-0.21
1.17
-2.06
-10.04
-9.87
1/18/17 4:00 PM
-9.59
-10.95
-13.15
0.13
1.28
-2.69
-10.57
-9.98
1/19/174:00 AM
-11.75
-13.05
-15.81
-1.04
-0.02
4.41
-12.92
-12.47
1/19/17 4:00 PM
-11.80
-13.16
-15.81
-0.40
1.17
-3.33
-11.95
-12.86
1/20/174:00 AM
-13.08
-14.16
-16.91
-1.01
0.78
-3.80
-12.40
-14.00
1/20/17 4:00 PM
-10.22
-11.45
-14.28
-0.62
1.20
-2.67
-10.13
-12.61
1/21/174:00 AM
-10.92
-13.00
-15.36
-1.06
0.87
-3.36
-11.34
-13.30
1/21/17 4:00 PM
-9.03
-7.63
-13.34
-0.70
1.59
-1.98
-8.94
-12.64
1/22/174:00 AM
-3.00
-3.11
-2.85
0.87
1.61
-1.62
-3.09
-1.04
1/22/17 4:00 PM
-2.64
-2.78
-2.57
0.96
1.64
-1.59
-2.98
-0.18
1/23/174:00 AM
-0.53
-1.23
-1.24
1.76
11.36
0.71
7.90
13.00
1/23/17 4:00 PM
-2.39
-2.51
-2.63
1.12
1.86
-1.56
0.01
-0.24
1/24/174:00 AM
-3.08
-3.23
-3.57
0.82
1.78
-2.53
-3.18
-0.76
1/24/17 4:00 PM
-3.97
4.14
4.54
0.71
1.31
-2.69
4.34
-0.87
1/25/174:00 AM
-5.19
4.91
-5.62
0.37
0.84
-3.17
-6.00
-1.21
1/25/17 4:00 PM
-5.71
-5.50
-6.34
0.35
0.95
-2.81
-6.22
-1.26
1/26/174:00 AM
-6.18
-5.58
-7.00
0.46
1.64
-2.36
-6.72
-1.23
1/26/17 4:00 PM
-7.79
-7.79
-9.08
-0.70
-0.21
4.88
-8.80
-2.48
1/27/174:00 AM
-8.73
-8.29
-10.35
-0.29
0.42
-4.77
-9.82
-2.95
1/27/17 4:00 PM
-9.56
-9.43
-11.57
-0.40
0.51
-4.30
-10.18
-4.67
1/28/174:00 AM
-11.19
-10.67
-13.45
-0.76
0.15
-5.35
-11.76
-7.35
1/28/17 4:00 PM
-12.05
-11.97
-14.42
-0.79
0.15
-4.85
-11.70
-8.71
1/29/174:00 AM
-12.91
-12.69
-15.31
-0.73
0.06
-4.91
-12.51
-10.12
1/29/17 4:00 PM
-13.66
-13.77
-15.97
-0.87
-0.10
-4.88
-12.53
-11.39
1/30/174:00 AM
-14.87
-15.02
-17.30
-1.18
-0.38
-6.02
-13.95
-13.08
1/30/17 4:00 PM
-16.12
-16.76
-18.77
-1.67
-1.13
-6.88
-14.91
-14.88
1/31/174:00 AM
-16.65
-17.26
-19.21
-1.56
-0.46
-6.74
-14.83
-15.85
1/31/17 4:00 PM
-16.81
-17.79
-19.63
-1.59
-0.71
-6.68
-14.61
-16.38
2/1/17 4:00 AM
-17.45
-18.59
-20.35
-1.56
-0.21
-7.51
-15.25
-17.07
2/1/17 4:00 PM
-17.84
-19.36
-20.93
-1.67
-0.49
-7.57
-15.11
-17.51
2/2/17 4:00 AM
-18.72
-20.50
-21.92
-2.09
-0.49
-8.95
-16.05
-18.37
2/2/17 4:00 PM
-19.28
-21.08
-22.56
-2.20
-0.52
-9.31
-15.99
-18.87
2/3/17 4:00 AM
-19.64
-21.75
-22.95
-2.06
0.04
-9.37
-15.63
-19.31
2/3/17 4:00 PM
-19.89
-22.27
-23.42
-2.75
-0.43
-9.64
-15.72
-19.78
2/4/17 4:00 AM
-21.30
-23.68
-24.83
-3.97
-1.71
-12.36
-18.13
-21.14
2/4/17 4:00 PM
-22.16
-24.35
-25.58
-4.69
-1.79
-12.91
-18.24
-21.89
2/5/17 4:00 AM
-22.10
-24.43
-25.52
-5.13
-1.32
-12.72
-17.66
-21.97
2/5/17 4:00 PM
-21.55
-23.77
-24.89
-4.55
-0.38
-11.39
-16.11
-21.22
2/6/17 4:00 AM
-22.54
-24.87
-25.99
-6.99
-1.38
-13.77
-18.13
-22.02
2/6/174 :00 PM
-22.60
-24.85
-26.22
-8.29
-0.96
-13.74
-17.60
-22.25
2/7/17 4:00 AM
-22.79
-25.23
-26.35
-8.73
-0.38
-13.49
-17.16
-22.36
2/7/174 :00 PM
-22.71
-25.23
-26.35
-8.48
-0.30
-12.55
-15.99
-22.27
2/8/17 4:00 AM
-22.35
-25.18
-25.94
-2.12
0.78
-5.41
-12.12
-22.16

2/8/17 4:00 PM
-17.23
-23.55
-23.28
-2.98
0.45
-4.33
-9.65
-21.50
2/9/17 4:00 AM
-13.57
-21.22
-19.79
-1.90
0.78
-2.61
-8.63
-20.53
2/9/174:00 PM
-11.75
-20.72
-18.85
-3.58
-0.60
-4.91
-10.82
-20.61
2/10/174:00 AM
-13.93
-22.11
-20.96
-4.89
-1.24
-6.18
-13.45
-21.61
2/10/17 4:00 PM
-14.85
-22.71
-21.90
-5.63
-0.93
-6.52
-13.31
-22.02
2/11/174:00 AM
-15.10
-22.44
-21.87
-6.38
-0.54
-6.40
-13.42
-21.53
2/11/17 4:00 PM
-15.62
-22.83
-22.42
-6.99
-0.90
-6.93
-13.64
-21.14
2/12/174:00 AM
-16.51
-23.66
-23.48
-8.04
-0.24
-7.57
-13.97
-21.55
2/12/17 4:00 PM
-16.73
-24.02
-23.89
-7.99
-0.24
-7.18
-13.61
-21.50
2/13/174:00 AM
-18.34
-25.43
-25.27
-10.37
-1.32
-9.89
-15.77
-22.05
2/13/17 4:00 PM
-20.47
-27.14
-27.16
-13.41
-2.90
-12.25
-17.38
-23.41
2/14/174:00 AM
-21.08
-27.42
-27.57
-14.46
-2.68
-13.69
-17.90
-23.52
2/14/17 4:00 PM
-21.33
-27.53
-27.60
-14.52
-2.09
-13.35
-17.13
-23.27
2/15/174:00 AM
-21.77
-28.06
-27.96
-14.44
-0.77
-13.38
-16.74
-23.41
2/15/17 4:00 PM
-4.38
-12.00
-9.80
-1.15
0.90
-6.29
-6.55
-2.81
2/16/174:00 AM
-6.02
-13.08
-10.24
-1.67
0.04
-4.63
-7.77
-3.09
2/16/17 4:00 PM
-6.96
-15.43
-12.18
-2.03
-0.07
-4.94
-8.69
-4.47
2/17/174:00 AM
-7.90
-17.15
-14.34
-2.17
-0.13
-5.71
-9.93
-7.49
2/17/17 4:00 PM
-8.42
-18.09
-15.81
-2.42
-0.16
-5.88
-10.21
-9.51
2/18/174:00 AM
-9.56
-19.31
-17.63
-2.81
-0.38
-6.85
-11.76
-11.53
2/18/17 4:00 PM
-10.45
-20.47
-19.18
-3.31
-0.99
-7.51
-12.48
-13.19
2/19/174:00 AM
-10.97
-21.44
-20.13
-3.33
-0.27
-7.59
-12.67
-14.41
2/19/17 4:00 PM
-11.55
-22.19
-20.87
-3.53
-0.49
-8.31
-13.25
-15.41
2/20/174:00 AM
-13.46
-24.02
-22.62
-4.72
-1.49
-10.47
-15.03
-17.29
2/20/17 4:00 PM
-14.38
-24.40
-23.45
-5.27
-1.54
-11.08
-15.47
-18.15
2/21/174:00 AM
-15.57
-25.29
-24.58
-7.35
-1.79
-12.55
-16.30
-19.23
2/21/17 4:00 PM
-16.29
-25.98
-25.19
-8.29
-1.29
-12.80
-16.11
-19.81
2/22/174:00 AM
-16.70
-26.31
-25.44
-8.84
-0.82
-12.85
-16.11
-20.09
2/22/17 4:00 PM
-17.01
-26.89
-26.11
-9.48
-0.54
-13.02
-16.30
-20.31
2/23/174:00 AM
-17.48
-27.28
-26.44
-10.51
-0.46
-13.85
-16.71
-20.72
2/23/17 4:00 PM
-18.20
-27.70
-26.91
-11.36
-0.77
-14.18
-16.88
-21.17
2/24/174:00 AM
-19.41
-28.47
-27.63
-13.02
-1.49
-15.84
-18.04
-21.69
2/24/17 4:00 PM
-19.89
-28.64
-28.02
-13.44
-1.18
-15.82
-17.77
-22.14
2/25/174:00 AM
-20.49
-29.00
-28.40
-14.16
-0.96
-16.20
-17.99
-22.58
2/25/17 4:00 PM
-21.33
-29.72
-29.04
-14.60
-1.65
-15.96
-18.04
-22.94
2/26/174:00 AM
-22.82
-30.85
-30.01
-18.31
-5.72
-20.25
-21.45
-23.85
2/26/17 4:00 PM
-24.15
-31.88
-30.87
-20.86
-6.72
-21.80
-22.20
-24.82
2/27/174:00 AM
-24.87
-32.35
-31.37
-21.97
-7.13
-22.46
-22.58
-25.35
2/27/17 4:00 PM
-25.87
-33.26
-32.20
-22.94
-7.35
-23.10
-22.80
-26.23
2/28/174:00 AM
-25.53
-33.12
-31.86
-22.02
-5.75
-22.13
-21.75
-25.90
2/28/17 4:00 PM
-25.67
-33.07
-31.81
-21.52
-4.42
-21.10
-20.92
-25.96
3/1/17 4:00 AM
-25.70
-32.99
-31.86
-20.67
-3.04
-20.30
-20.23
-25.93
3/1/17 4:00 PM
-25.42
-32.54
-31.50
-19.70
-1.62
-18.78
-18.96
-25.60
3/2/17 4:00 AM
-18.11
-32.04
-29.93
-3.56
0.12
-7.04
-10.37
-25.15
3/2/17 4:00 PM
-12.58
-29.58
-24.06
-6.41
-1.10
-6.43
-10.87
-24.24
3/3/17 4:00 AM
-13.46
-27.17
-22.67
-9.73
-2.21
-8.62
-12.67
-23.52
3/3/17 4:00 PM
-14.38
-25.87
-23.59
-10.84
-2.87
-9.28
-13.64
-23.35
3/4/17 4:00 AM
-16.37
-26.01
-25.14
-13.77
-5.00
-11.72
-15.94
-23.96
3/4/17 4:00 PM
-16.90
-25.79
-25.50
-14.57
-3.92
-11.66
-15.52
-23.85
3/5/17 4:00 AM
-17.70
-25.95
-26.05
-15.68
-4.89
-13.30
-16.94
-23.71
3/5/17 4:00 PM
-18.20
-25.93
-26.60
-16.68
-4.59
-13.74
-16.88
-23.71
3/6/17 4:00 AM
-18.97
-26.31
-27.16
-17.45
-5.03
-14.77
-17.82
-23.69
3/6/17 4:00 PM
-19.03
-26.12
-27.07
-17.48
-3.26
-14.13
-16.91
-23.30
3/7/17 4:00 AM
-19.17
-26.04
-27.27
-17.70
-2.70
-14.24
-17.13
-23.44
3/7/17 4:00 PM
-19.08
-25.84
-27.32
-17.40
-2.29
-13.46
-16.69
-23.30
3/8/17 4:00 AM
-18.75
-25.68
-27.16
-15.88
-0.90
-12.16
-15.52
-23.08
3/8/17 4:00 PM
-18.25
-26.76
-28.43
-15.32
-1.76
-11.25
-15.58
-24.43
3/9/17 4:00 AM
-17.39
-25.62
-27.21
-16.93
-2.48
-12.83
-16.66
-23.85
3/9/17 4:00 PM
-17.95
-25.62
-27.49
-17.56
-2.43
-13.13
-16.63
-24.16
3/10/174:00 AM
-18.22
-24.60
-26.71
-17.15
-1.82
-12.91
-16.41
-22.94
3/10/17 4:00 PM
-17.23
-24.82
-27.52
-13.88
-1.07
-10.14
-14.94
-23.41
3/11/174:00 AM
-17.78
-24.90
-27.99
-17.56
-3.48
-13.46
-17.63
-24.07
3/11/17 4:00 PM
-18.81
-25.18
-28.35
-19.28
-4.09
-14.85
-18.38
-24.46
3/12/174:00 AM
-19.36
-25.07
-28.29
-19.70
-3.48
-15.57
-18.38
-24.43
3/12/17 4:00 PM
-12.19
-23.68
-27.30
-8.65
0.92
-5.32
-9.46
-24.02
3/13/174:00 AM
-8.23
-17.29
-19.68
-8.23
-0.68
-4.94
-9.63
-18.92
3/13/17 4:00 PM
-7.32
-16.07
-18.38
-7.21
0.23
-3.36
-8.91
-17.10
3/14/174:00 AM
-2.08
-2.89
-1.88
0.18
1.70
-2.39
-2.71
-0.68
3/14/17 4:00 PM
-3.30
-3.53
-3.16
0.32
0.84
-3.11
-4.28
-0.90
3/15/174:00 AM
-5.57
-5.69
-5.73
-0.68
-0.88
-4.66
-7.22
-2.29
3/15/17 4:00 PM
-6.35
-6.02
-6.50
-0.68
-1.04
-5.16
-8.24
-2.45
3/16/174:00 AM
-8.09
-7.35
-8.47
-1.29
-2.26
-6.46
-10.46
-3.31
3/16/17 4:00 PM
-8.40
-7.54
-9.25
-1.23
-1.54
-6.49
-10.60
-3.28
3/17/174:00 AM
-9.28
-8.73
-10.71
-1.26
-2.43
-7.29
-12.62
-4.69
3/17/17 4:00 PM
-9.31
-8.35
-11.21
-1.04
-1.35
-6.85
-12.15
-5.50
3/18/174:00 AM
-9.14
-8.37
-11.49
-0.57
-0.38
-6.27
-11.98
-6.49
3/18/17 4:00 PM
-7.82
-6.80
-10.60
-0.32
0.34
-4.19
-10.49
-6.38
3/19/174:00 AM
-4.44
-5.08
-6.39
-0.26
0.48
-3.33
-7.36
-3.03
3/19/17 4:00 PM
-5.71
-5.99
-8.17
-0.84
-0.35
-4.27
-8.77
-3.89
3/20/174:00 AM
-7.04
-7.07
-10.08
-1.12
-1.07
-5.16
-10.65
-6.00
3/20/17 4:00 PM
-6.98
-6.55
-10.55
-0.87
-0.27
-4.85
-10.29
-6.22
3/21/174:00 AM
-7.26
-7.07
-11.43
-0.84
-0.07
-4.77
-10.96
-6.91
3/21/17 4:00 PM
-7.29
-6.55
-11.65
-0.76
0.23
-4.60
-10.85
-7.19
3/22/174:00 AM
-8.09
-7.63
-12.93
-0.95
-0.32
-5.16
-12.06
-8.40
3/22/17 4:00 PM
-9.73
-9.32
-15.47
-1.76
-2.43
-7.12
-14.42
-10.54
3/23/174:00 AM
-11.58
-11.31
-17.97
-2.17
-4.36
-9.56
-16.55
-13.19
3/23/17 4:00 PM
-12.66
-12.19
-18.99
-2.53
-4.12
-10.28
-16.77
-14.55
3/24/174:00 AM
-13.85
-13.30
-20.01
-2.95
-4.67
-11.66
-17.63
-15.35
3/24/17 4:00 PM
-13.71
-12.89
-19.99
-3.33
-3.59
-11.36
-16.71
-15.55
3/25/174:00 AM
-14.54
-13.69
-20.54
-3.81
-3.53
-12.11
-17.16
-15.88
3/2,/174 :00 PM
-14.68
-13.63
-20.79
-4.36
-2.81
-11.86
-16.96
-16.18
3/26/174:00 AM
-15.35
-14.35
-21.56
-5.16
-3.01
-12.61
-17.54
-16.40
3/26/174 :00 PM
-15.54
-14.41
-21.87
-6.24
-2.81
-12.61
-17.57
-16.68
3/27/174:00 AM
-15.18
-14.66
-21.92
-6.52
-1.71
-11.83
-16.83
-17.15

3/27/17 4:00 PM
-14.43
-13.74
-21.62
-6.88
-0.71
-10.70
-15.83
-16.79
3/28/174:00 AM
-15.62
-14.63
-22.06
-8.10
-1.62
-11.66
-16.80
-16.90
3/28/17 4:00 PM
-12.52
-11.61
-20.79
-6.41
-0.10
-8.51
-14.89
-16.07
3/29/174:00 AM
-14.54
-13.74
-21.56
-8.73
-1.87
-10.70
-17.05
-16.82
3/29/17 4:00 PM
-15.84
-14.69
-22.56
-10.31
-2.23
-11.80
-17.74
-17.71
3/30/174:00 AM
-17.14
-15.85
-23.36
-11.89
-3.23
-13.35
-18.79
-18.18
3/30/17 4:00 PM
-16.92
-15.38
-23.39
-12.39
-2.15
-13.08
-17.93
-18.20
3/31/174:00 AM
-12.02
-10.01
-21.98
-6.32
0.84
-7.76
-13.72
-17.24
3/31/17 4:00 PM
-7.76
-7.65
-17.88
-4.83
0.92
-5.13
-11.65
-13.72
4/1/17 4:00 AM
-11.28
-11.47
-19.71
-8.26
-1.57
-8.31
-15.44
-15.71
4/1/174:00 PM
-12.55
-12.53
-20.79
-10.03
-2.07
-9.31
-16.22
-16.85
4/2/17 5:00 AM
-15.71
-15.05
-22.84
-13.69
-4.81
-12.94
-18.82
-18.43
4/2/17 5:00 PM
-15.65
-14.77
-23.03
-14.10
-3.89
-13.13
-18.04
-18.31
4/3/17 5:00 AM
-17.59
-16.35
-24.47
-15.96
-5.20
-15.04
-19.48
-19.15
4/3/17 5:00 PM
-16.04
-12.83
-21.43
-1.26
-1.73
-11.86
-17.93
-18.73
4/4/17 5:00 AM
-3.75
-3.75
-3.93
-0.37
0.59
-3.80
-5.09
-1.01
4/4/17 5:00 PM
-4.69
-3.81
-4.59
0.24
1.37
-4.02
-5.86
-0.49
4/5/17 5:00 AM
-6.62
-5.44
-6.59
-0.40
0.06
-5.21
-8.38
-1.84
4/5/17 5:00 PM
-2.17
-2.15
-0.89
1.15
1.81
-2.33
-5.00
-0.60
4/6/17 5:00 AM
-2.53
-2.67
-1.22
0.60
1.86
-2.61
-2.12
-0.29
4/6/17 5:00 PM
-4.60
-3.75
-3.99
0.65
1.64
-2.20
-2.29
-0.32
4/7/17 5:00 AM
-7.07
-5.50
-6.06
-0.04
0.23
-4.77
-5.97
-1.40
4/7/17 5:00 PM
-8.04
-6.13
-7.36
-0.01
-0.07
-5.88
-8.08
-1.59
4/8/17 5:00 AM
-10.97
-8.29
-10.57
-0.98
-1.98
-8.87
-11.45
-3.59
4/8/17 5:00 PM
-11.52
-8.32
-11.32
-0.54
-1.24
-8.65
-11.70
-4.89
4/9/17 5:00 AM
-14.32
-10.81
-14.53
-1.34
-2.95
-11.53
-14.67
-8.27
4/9/17 5:00 PM
-14.68
-10.81
-15.09
-1.12
-2.48
-11.91
-14.75
-9.37
4/10/17 5:00 AM
-16.40
-12.72
-17.22
-1.20
-3.40
-13.99
-16.47
-11.56
4/10/17 5:00 PM
-17.20
-13.27
-18.19
-1.48
-3.56
-14.57
-16.71
-12.92
4/11/17 5:00 AM
-18.89
-15.02
-19.90
-2.09
-4.53
-16.15
-18.10
-14.49
4/11/17 5:00 PM
-19.06
-15.24
-20.32
-2.59
-4.36
-16.32
-18.04
-15.16
4/12/17 5:00 AM
-20.47
-16.60
-21.56
-3.00
-5.22
-17.64
-19.18
-16.04
4/12/17 5:00 PM
-20.69
-16.68
-22.26
-3.72
-5.28
-17.98
-19.23
-16.60
4/13/17 5:00 AM
-22.24
-18.40
-23.75
-5.66
-6.66
-19.42
-20.59
-17.73
4/13/17 5:00 PM
-22.07
-17.90
-23.70
-6.60
-6.30
-19.28
-19.95
-18.01
4/14/17 5:00 AM
-23.40
-19.50
-24.97
-9.76
-8.05
-20.63
-21.34
-18.81
4/14/17 5:00 PM
-23.54
-19.34
-25.19
-11.11
-7.16
-20.30
-20.78
-19.12
4/15/17 5:00 AM
-24.31
-20.25
-25.94
-13.33
-8.41
-21.41
-21.92
-19.53
4/15/17 5:00 PM
-24.70
-20.56
-26.41
-14.77
-8.38
-21.46
-21.64
-20.17
4/16/17 5:00 AM
-25.62
-21.44
-27.21
-16.84
-9.54
-22.16
-22.47
-20.72
4/16/17 5:00 PM
-26.06
-21.58
-27.63
-17.81
-9.32
-22.10
-22.14
-21.00
4/17/17 5:00 AM
-26.75
-22.35
-28.35
-19.14
-10.57
-22.90
-23.33
-21.44
4/17/17 5:00 PM
-27.36
-22.69
-29.01
-19.86
-10.57
-23.10
-23.14
-21.94
4/18/17 5:00 AM
-28.22
-23.66
-30.01
-20.86
-11.04
-24.59
-24.38
-22.72
4/18/17 5:00 PM
-28.02
-23.02
-29.81
-21.00
-10.26
-24.45
-23.86
-22.88
4/19/17 5:00 AM
-28.19
-23.30
-30.29
-21.91
-10.73
-24.81
-24.38
-23.33
4/19/17 5:00 PM
-28.94
-23.71
-30.56
-22.35
-9.98
-24.93
-23.77
-23.88
4/20/17 5:00 AM
-28.97
-23.79
-30.92
-22.33
-9.98
-24.73
-23.77
-24.29
4/20/17 5:00 PM
-28.66
-23.21
-30.53
-21.47
-8.91
-23.79
-23.03
-23.93
4/21/17 5:00 AM
-28.91
-24.02
-30.98
-22.16
-10.48
-24.32
-24.11
-24.32
4/21/17 5:00 PM
-29.08
-24.07
-31.06
-22.10
-10.32
-24.37
-23.94
-24.32
4/22/17 5:00 AM
-30.10
-25.04
-31.78
-23.13
-12.03
-25.28
-25.07
-24.82
4/22/17 5:00 PM
-30.65
-25.95
-32.56
-23.85
-12.61
-25.92
-25.41
-25.40
4/23/17 5:00 AM
-31.07
-26.26
-32.78
-24.54
-13.97
-26.61
-26.13
-25.57
4/23/17 5:00 PM
-31.40
-14.74
-33.03
-15.82
-2.32
-19.67
-18.74
-25.79
4/24/17 5:00 AM
-4.13
-3.14
-1.63
0.76
0.34
-4.19
-8.94
-4.67
4/24/17 5:00 PM
18.15
13.86
8.08
10.92
31.51
10.10
21.41
29.94
4/25/17 5:00 AM
-2.69
-3.14
-2.66
0.07
0.34
-2.83
0.53
-0.24
4/25/17 5:00 PM
-2.53
-2.84
-2.71
0.65
1.17
-2.58
-2.76
0.04
4/26/17 5:00 AM
-3.30
-3.42
-3.85
0.49
1.03
-2.75
-4.23
-0.38
4/26/17 5:00 PM
-4.85
4.06
4.90
0.32
1.17
-3.47
-5.70
-0.43
4/27/17 5:00 AM
-5.79
4.53
-6.37
0.35
1.31
4.05
-7.61
-1.46
4/27/17 5:00 PM
-7.10
-5.52
-8.03
0.04
0.87
4.94
-8.71
-2.18
4/28/17 5:00 AM
-8.01
-5.69
-9.88
0.18
1.01
-5.30
-10.26
-3.34
4/28/17 5:00 PM
-8.81
-6.35
-11.16
-0.04
0.92
-5.57
-10.87
4.31
4/29/17 5:00 AM
-10.94
-7.63
-13.92
-0.15
0.92
-7.15
-12.95
-6.77
4/29/17 5:00 PM
-12.83
-8.84
-16.22
-0.59
0.62
-7.93
-13.78
-9.23
4/30/17 5:00 AM
-14.90
-10.15
-18.35
-0.79
0.29
-9.62
-15.47
-11.67
4/30/17 5:00 PM
-16.31
-11.00
-19.82
-1.01
0.12
-10.53
-15.77
-13.28
5/1/17 5:00 AM
-18.20
-12.67
-21.45
-1.48
-0.60
-12.38
-17.21
-14.52
5/1/17 5:00 PM
-18.83
-12.75
-22.15
-1.67
-0.57
-12.49
-16.96
-15.13
5/2/17 5:00 AM
-15.51
-7.65
-19.68
-1.20
0.42
-6.07
-13.72
-11.56
5/2/17 5:00 PM
-15.62
-10.01
-19.74
-1.92
-0.41
-6.85
-14.69
-13.47
5/3/17 5:00 AM
-18.67
-12.55
-21.90
-2.28
-2.07
-9.73
-17.66
-15.85
5/3/17 5:00 PM
-20.55
-13.97
-23.72
-3.50
-3.17
-11.50
-18.79
-17.29
5/4/17 5:00 AM
-22.07
-15.57
-24.86
-3.72
-4.12
-14.27
-19.81
-18.18
5/4/17 5:00 PM
-22.76
-15.74
-25.36
-4.75
-4.53
-14.65
-19.98
-18.37
5/5/17 5:00 AM
-5.43
-3.50
-2.21
1.07
6.29
-8.54
-9.21
-2.04
5/5/17 5:00 PM
-5.46
4.22
-5.23
0.43
0.90
-3.94
4.28
-0.43
5/6/17 5:00 AM
-7.37
-5.50
-7.89
0.35
0.56
-5.57
-7.41
-1.76
5/6/17 5:00 PM
-9.50
-7.35
-11.24
-0.10
-0.85
-7.57
-10.46
-3.17
5/7/17 5:00 AM
-12.11
-8.82
-14.84
-0.70
-1.32
-9.89
-12.84
-5.88
5/7/17 5:00 PM
-13.82
-10.48
-16.64
-0.84
-1.85
-10.94
-13.97
-8.21
5/8/17 5:00 AM
-17.09
-13.11
-20.46
-1.09
-3.73
-14.57
-17.19
-12.39
5/8/17 5:00 PM
-19.08
-14.58
-22.17
-1.84
4.84
-16.15
-17.96
-14.72
5/9/17 5:00 AM
-21.13
-16.40
-24.17
-1.76
-6.25
-18.28
-19.59
-15.88
5/9/17 5:00 PM
-22.21
-16.65
-25.03
-2.31
-5.69
-19.11
-19.48
-17.01
5/10/17 5:00 AM
-23.54
-17.79
-26.41
-2.64
-6.66
-19.86
-20.87
-17.62
5/10/17 5:00 PM
-24.67
-18.48
-27.21
-3.97
-7.24
-20.52
-21.06
-18.51
5/11/17 -1 0 AM
-25.45
-19.20
-27.77
-5.38
-7.74
-20.80
-21.53
-18.73
5/11/17 5:00 PM
-26.45
-19.70
-28.62
-6.93
-8.16
-21.19
-22.11
-19.51
5/12/17 -1 0 AM
-27.39
-20.89
-29.79
-9.87
-9.35
-22.21
-23.30
-20.42
5/12/17 5:00 PM
-28.08
-21.33
-30.34
-11.70
-8.52
-22.85
-23.39
-20.78
5/13/17 5:00 AM
-28.11
-8.24
-29.70
-1.87
-1.32
-19.42
-18.57
-17.60
-1.27
1.69
5.40
2.58
2.86
2.72
2.27
1.31
2.08
0.92
2.05
1.11
2.00
0.23
2.19
0.06
1.83
2.19
2.50

5/13/17 5:00 PM
-20.94
-8.32
-22.76
-3.09
-1.02
-10.47
-14.91
-13.17
1.89
5/14/17 5:00 AM
-18.83
-11.23
-22.92
-4.44
-2.32
-12.05
-17.32
-15.19
2.30
5/14/17 5:00 PM
-19.55
-12.61
-24.11
-6.21
-3.04
-13.52
-17.88
-16.88
0.25
5/15/17 5:00 AM
-21.30
-15.38
-25.55
-9.54
-4.84
-16.18
-19.79
-17.68
1.80
5/15/17 5:00 PM
-22.90
-16.04
-27.02
-11.45
-5.75
-17.70
-20.48
-18.43
-0.60
5/16/17 5:00 AM
-24.98
-18.67
-28.76
-15.10
-8.27
-20.05
-22.50
-19.31
0.97
5/16/17 5:00 PM
-26.45
-19.53
-30.01
-17.34
-9.15
-21.24
-23.36
-20.47
-2.27
5/17/17 5:00 AM
-27.61
-21.03
-30.84
-18.95
-10.46
-22.24
-24.36
-21.22
-0.36
5/17/17 5:00 PM
-29.19
-22.30
-32.31
-20.89
-11.90
-23.79
-25.41
-22.41
-4.90
5/18/17 5:00 AM
-29.99
-23.46
-33.05
-21.91
-13.33
-24.48
-26.38
-22.94
-3.87
5/18/17 5:00 PM
-30.85
-23.93
-33.77
-22.99
-13.61
-25.23
-26.38
-23.35
-9.21
5/19/17 5:00 AM
-31.73
-24.74
-34.66
-23.99
-14.44
-25.87
-27.40
-24.21
-8.52
5/19/17 5:00 PM
-32.26
-25.15
-35.30
-24.62
-13.72
-26.20
-27.54
-24.88
-15.00
5/20/17 5:00 AM
-32.98
-25.95
-36.21
-25.45
-14.55
-26.78
-28.26
-25.32
-14.36
5/20/17 5:00 PM
-33.81
-26.53
-36.82
-26.53
-14.61
-27.64
-28.70
-26.23
-20.84
5/21/17 5:00 AM
-34.17
-27.09
-37.26
-26.84
-15.47
-28.00
-29.17
-26.65
-19.24
5/21/17 5:00 PM
-34.64
-27.56
-37.73
-27.23
-15.02
-28.33
-29.06
-27.04
-22.53
5/22/17 5:00 AM
-27.47
-3.72
-27.74
-0.32
1.25
-13.13
-16.11
-7.08
2.63
5/22/17 5:00 PM
-15.95
-5.47
-20.21
-0.87
-2.09
-10.53
-12.23
-5.75
1.14
5/23/17 5:00 AM
-13.74
-6.30
-20.13
-0.98
-1.73
-9.70
-13.64
-5.55
2.00
5/23/17 5:00 PM
-2.47
-2.31
-1.99
1.04
7.18
-3.19
-4.81
0.95
13.24
5/24/17 5:00 AM
-2.75
-2.64
-3.38
0.87
0.06
-2.61
-1.79
-0.02
3.08
5/24/17 5:00 PM
-1.56
-2.53
-2.52
0.96
0.45
-1.86
-3.29
0.07
4.27
5/25/17 5:00 AM
-2.03
-1.84
-1.66
1.07
7.21
-1.92
3.16
4.99
3.49
5/25/17 5:00 PM
-4.96
4.44
-5.45
0.35
0.29
-3.36
-3.23
-0.79
1.67
5/26/17 5:00 AM
-6.62
-6.49
-8.94
0.71
0.37
-5.85
-8.41
-1.65
3.13
5/26/17 5:00 PM
-8.67
-8.96
-13.01
-0.07
-0.18
-7.21
-10.73
-2.90
0.86
5/27/17 5:00 AM
-11.28
-12.19
-17.38
0.01
0.18
-10.28
-14.11
-7.71
2.55
5/27/17 5:00 PM
-12.94
-13.66
-19.27
-0.01
0.20
-11.25
-15.14
-10.26
1.08
5/28/17 5:00 AM
-15.32
-15.82
-21.68
-0.29
0.45
-12.97
-16.16
-13.06
3.22
5/28/17 5:00 PM
-16.76
-17.18
-23.12
-0.54
-0.30
-15.12
-17.71
-15.13
0.31
5/29/17 5:00 AM
-19.03
-19.72
-25.50
-1.12
-1.90
-17.89
-19.70
-17.01
2.69
5/29/17 5:00 PM
-20.91
-21.30
-27.16
-1.95
-3.06
-20.00
-21.31
-18.95
-0.88
5/30/17 5:00 AM
-22.54
-23.07
-28.51
-2.62
4.97
-21.38
-22.42
-20.03
2.11
5/30/17 5:00 PM
-23.54
-23.77
-29.65
-3.94
-5.33
-22.99
-22.89
-21.08
0.03
5/31/17 5:00 AM
-24.76
-24.54
-30.62
-6.82
-6.61
-23.24
-24.00
-21.80
2.36
5/31/17 5:00 PM
-25.64
-25.26
-31.28
-9.12
-6.91
-24.32
-24.36
-22.63
-0.77
6/1/17 5:00 AM
-26.70
-26.23
-32.06
-12.00
-8.55
-25.26
-25.27
-23.44
1.42
6/1/17 5:00 PM
-27.55
-26.84
-32.67
-14.35
-8.91
-25.42
-25.66
-24.13
-1.52
6/2/17 5:00 AM
-28.25
-27.61
-33.39
-16.51
-10.59
-26.72
-26.35
-24.68
0.89
6/2/17 5:00 PM
-29.46
-28.47
-34.19
-19.00
-11.67
-27.58
-26.96
-25.68
-3.87
6/3/17 5:00 AM
-30.18
-29.22
-34.94
-20.78
-13.25
-28.27
-27.62
-26.20
-1.46
6/3/17 5:00 PM
-30.90
-29.88
-35.38
-21.99
-13.45
-28.41
-27.90
-26.65
-6.25
6/4/17 5:00 AM
-31.71
-30.77
-36.21
-23.21
-14.97
-29.66
-28.84
-27.15
4.62
6/4/17 5:00 PM
-32.18
-30.41
-34.60
-14.10
-3.70
-27.08
-27.35
-27.51
0.72
6/5/17 5:00 AM
-3.30
-3.70
-6.28
0.98
-0.54
4.13
-3.98
-1.95
2.61
6/5/17 5:00 PM
-4.63
4.44
-7.78
0.87
0.18
4.60
-5.83
-1.01
1.39
6/6/17 5:00 AM
-3.97
4.50
-8.36
0.68
0.54
-3.66
-6.08
-0.96
2.74
6/6/17 5:00 PM
-5.46
-6.08
-11.40
0.37
0.34
-5.19
-8.66
-1.59
0.42
6/7/17 5:00 AM
-7.84
-8.57
-16.00
0.49
0.15
-7.04
-12.45
-6.27
1.80
6/7/17 5:00 PM
-10.11
-11.39
-19.49
-0.12
0.09
-10.03
-14.91
-10.34
-1.08
6/8/17 5:00 AM
-13.08
-14.46
-22.28
0.01
-0.38
-13.08
-17.24
-14.27
0.53
6/8/17 5:00 PM
-15.46
-16.65
-23.97
-0.46
-1.10
-15.10
-18.21
-16.71
-3.18
6/9/17 5:00 AM
-17.92
-19.03
-26.19
-0.95
-1.90
-17.40
-19.73
-18.18
-2.54
6/9/17 5:00 PM
-20.13
-21.03
-27.49
-1.12
-2.84
-18.92
-21.01
-19.92
-8.05
6/10/17 5:00 AM
-22.18
-23.07
-29.21
-1.56
-5.33
-20.72
-22.28
-20.92
-7.75
6/10/17 5:00 PM
-23.73
-24.29
-30.37
-3.22
-5.31
-21.66
-23.05
-22.05
-15.58
6/11/17 5:00 AM
-25.26
-25.54
-31.50
-5.30
-7.63
-22.90
-24.24
-22.91
-15.08
6/11/17 5:00 PM
-26.92
-27.20
-32.86
-8.79
-8.85
-23.93
-25.38
-24.13
-21.95
6/12/17 5:00 AM
-27.86
-28.20
-33.47
-13.02
-10.90
-24.84
-26.18
-24.82
-21.92
6/12/17 5:00 PM
-29.22
-29.05
-34.41
-15.57
-10.59
-25.70
-26.76
-25.68
-26.27
6/13/17 5:00 AM
-30.18
-30.11
-35.27
-18.23
-12.12
-26.59
-27.68
-26.18
-26.24
6/13/17 5:00 PM
-31.10
-30.77
-35.82
-19.72
-12.48
-27.44
-28.12
-26.90
-29.62
6/14/17 5:00 AM
-32.09
-31.82
-36.85
-21.38
-13.39
-28.52
-28.92
-27.67
-29.48
6/14/17 5:00 PM
-32.73
-32.51
-37.65
-22.46
-13.64
-29.41
-29.39
-28.31
-33.30
6/15/17 5:00 AM
-33.64
-33.37
-38.42
-23.41
-15.38
-30.32
-30.06
-29.00
-34.10
6/15/17 5:00 PM
-33.92
-33.76
-38.70
-23.93
-14.52
-30.68
-30.14
-29.39
-36.79
6/16/17 5:00 AM
-34.70
-34.78
-39.64
-25.34
-16.16
-31.76
-31.08
-30.16
-37.67
6/16/17 5:00 PM
-35.06
-35.28
-39.97
-25.87
-17.04
-32.37
-31.41
-30.86
-39.89
6/17/17 5:00 AM
-35.75
-35.92
40.58
-26.51
-15.24
-33.17
-31.91
-31.66
-40.39
6/17/17 5:00 PM
-35.91
-35.95
40.69
-26.53
-11.40
-33.31
-31.11
-32.32
-41.38
6/18/17 5:00 AM
-36.39
-36.11
40.75
-26.70
-11.26
-33.62
-31.22
-33.10
-40.80
6/18/17 5:00 PM
-36.58
-35.84
40.75
-26.62
-10.79
-33.42
-31.30
-33.43
-43.21
6/19/17 5:00 AM
-36.86
-36.42
40.75
-27.28
-13.64
-34.01
-32.30
-34.07
-44.76
6/19/17 5:00 PM
-36.99
-36.31
40.75
-27.25
-13.50
-34.09
-32.33
-34.18
-46.20
6/20/17 5:00 AM
17.88
13.91
9.05
12.67
30.68
11.59
22.49
29.88
7.40
6/20/17 5:00 PM
-2.50
-2.87
-3.40
0.90
0.34
-3.19
-1.79
-0.24
2.36
6/21/17 5:00 AM
-1.20
-1.29
-1.05
1.32
5.91
-1.92
4.30
7.32
3.08
6/21/17 5:00 PM
-3.05
-3.17
4.84
1.01
0.81
-3.17
-2.84
-0.38
0.20
6/22/17 5:00 AM
-4.41
4.00
-7.28
0.90
0.81
-2.81
4.98
-0.93
2.27
6/22/17 5:00 PM
-4.77
4.14
-8.00
0.82
0.92
-2.56
-5.20
-0.98
2.00
6/23/17 5:00 AM
-5.24
4.42
-9.00
0.82
1.23
-2.36
-5.64
-1.10
2.63
6/23/17 5:00 PM
-5.49
-5.61
-12.40
1.04
1.53
-3.28
-7.33
-2.18
-1.93
6/24/17 5:00 AM
-7.70
-9.04
-17.97
0.46
1.12
-5.21
-11.15
-8.99
2.14
6/24/17 5:00 PM
-9.59
-11.50
-20.82
0.54
1.37
-6.40
-13.03
-12.45
0.67
6/25/17 5:00 AM
-12.11
-14.99
-23.06
0.21
1.01
-7.71
-14.56
-16.07
2.33
6/25/17 5:00 PM
-14.04
-17.18
-24.64
-0.07
0.76
-8.90
-15.58
-17.82
-2.68
6/26/17 5:00 AM
-16.26
-19.89
-26.91
-0.32
0.51
-11.58
-17.30
-19.87
0.11
6/26/17 5:00 PM
-18.22
-21.88
-28.62
-0.98
0.06
-13.05
-18.24
-21.22
-6.31
6/27/17 5:00 AM
-19.64
-23.43
-30.12
-1.06
0.18
-14.88
-19.40
-22.33
-4.29
6/27/17 5:00 PM
-21.30
-25.46
-31.75
-1.87
-0.77
-17.06
-20.92
-23.80
-13.26
6/28/17 5:00 AM
-22.79
-27.23
-33.39
-2.73
-1.98
-19.42
-22.64
-25.13
-12.90
6/28/17 5:00 PM
-24.48
-29.11
-34.83
-5.44
-2.62
-21.27
-23.88
-26.54
-20.87
6/29/17 5:00 AM
-25.73
-30.58
-36.27
-10.15
-4.06
-22.68
-25.16
-27.53
-20.23

6/29/17 5:00 PM
-27.06
-31.96
-37.54
-13.49
-4.78
-23.79
-25.93
-28.42
-26.57
6/30/17 5:00 AM
-28.25
-33.04
-38.34
-17.26
-6.66
-25.12
-27.07
-28.97
-26.54
6/30/17 5:00 PM
-29.30
-33.98
-39.06
-19.47
-6.77
-26.12
-27.62
-29.75
-29.84
7/1/17 5:00 AM
-30.18
-34.92
-40.09
-21.02
-7.94
-27.28
-28.48
-30.61
-29.98
7/1/17 5:00 PM
-31.24
-35.70
-40.42
-22.24
-8.24
-28.41
-28.92
-31.41
-33.19
7/2/17 5:00 AM
-32.34
-36.97
-40.75
-23.30
-8.19
-29.83
-29.81
-32.46
-33.47
7/2/17 5:00 PM
-32.76
-37.39
-40.75
-23.27
-6.69
-30.16
-29.62
-33.10
-36.04
7/3/17 5:00 AM
-33.70
-38.16
-40.56
-24.04
-9.62
-30.99
-30.64
-33.85
-37.20
7/3/17 5:00 PM
-34.09
-38.33
-40.58
-20.89
-5.31
-31.04
-29.78
-34.21
-39.58
7/4/17 5:00 AM
-5.96
-7.07
-33.16
0.07
0.26
-6.71
-11.29
-2.70
-37.48
7/4/17 5:00 PM
-7.84
-9.87
-31.48
-0.01
0.70
-6.68
-14.58
-11.92
-35.24
7/5/17 5:00 AM
-11.14
-14.94
-31.28
-0.68
0.56
-8.62
-17.49
-18.43
-32.41
7/5/17 5:00 PM
-13.52
-17.40
-30.89
-0.73
0.56
-9.75
-18.43
-20.53
-34.49
7/6/17 5:00 AM
-8.23
-10.98
-29.54
-0.07
0.73
-3.69
-12.01
-11.59
-29.31
7/6/17 5:00 PM
-8.92
-12.14
-27.85
-0.18
1.01
-4.52
-13.42
-14.38
-28.43
7/7/17 5:00 AM
-12.36
-17.18
-29.18
-0.93
0.54
-7.65
-16.96
-18.79
-27.15
7/7/17 5:00 PM
-14.54
-19.34
-29.90
-1.01
0.56
-9.73
-18.35
-20.28
-32.14
7/8/17 5:00 AM
-17.73
-23.07
-32.11
-1.70
0.34
-13.24
-20.42
-22.36
-33.24
7/8/17 5:00 PM
-19.86
-25.01
-33.69
-3.14
-0.32
-15.01
-21.59
-23.91
-36.21
7/9/17 5:00 AM
-21.63
-27.42
-36.27
-2.75
0.29
-16.04
-23.44
-26.04
-37.78
7/9/17 5:00 PM
-22.68
-28.47
-37.21
-4.83
0.12
-16.18
-24.08
-26.76
-39.83
7/10/17 5:00 AM
-24.23
-30.27
-38.65
-9.70
-1.18
-18.72
-25.27
-27.95
-41.27
7/10/17 5:00 PM
-25.45
-31.41
-39.59
-12.75
-2.09
-19.75
-26.07
-28.50
-42.35
7/11/17 5:00 AM
-27.08
-33.26
-40.20
-17.09
-3.92
-21.91
-27.43
-29.50
-43.71
7/11/17 5:00 PM
-28.16
-34.20
-40.47
-18.95
-5.36
-23.13
-28.18
-30.14
-46.39
7/12/17 5:00 AM
-29.82
-35.62
-40.75
-21.19
-7.71
-25.42
-29.75
-31.49
-47.86
7/12/17 5:00 PM
-30.54
-36.45
-40.00
-22.19
-8.68
-26.56
-30.25
-32.30
-48.00
7/13/17 5:00 AM
-32.09
-37.94
-40.69
-23.82
-11.34
-28.58
-31.80
-33.82
-48.00
7/13/17 5:00 PM
-32.84
-38.52
-40.33
-24.40
-11.92
-29.52
-32.08
-33.96
-48.00
7/14/17 5:00 AM
-34.03
-39.27
-40.45
-25.43
-14.11
-31.40
-33.41
-34.90
-48.00
7/14/17 5:00 PM
-34.67
-39.82
-40.20
-25.81
-14.69
-32.26
-33.46
-35.42
-48.00
7/15/17 5:00 AM
-35.61
-40.71
-40.75
-26.76
-16.82
-34.01
-34.68
-36.56
-48.00
7/15/17 5:00 PM
-35.86
-41.24
-40.56
-27.06
-17.13
-34.95
-34.79
-36.48
-48.00
7/16/17 5:00 AM
-36.66
-41.90
-40.75
-27.78
-18.54
-36.36
-35.65
-37.17
-48.00
7/16/17 5:00 PM
-36.88
-42.23
-40.61
-28.11
-18.37
-37.22
-35.59
-37.11
-48.00
7/17/17 5:00 AM
-37.58
-43.03
-40.75
-28.72
-19.87
-38.30
-36.43
-37.50
-48.00
7/17/17 5:00 PM
-37.74
-43.31
-40.36
-29.00
-19.78
-38.99
-36.43
-37.03
-48.00
7/18/17 5:00 AM
-38.49
-44.20
-40.75
-29.99
-21.14
-40.46
-37.56
-37.50
-48.00
7/18/17 5:00 PM
-38.85
-44.47
-40.47
-30.52
-21.25
-41.09
-37.42
-37.50
-48.00
7/19/17 5:00 AM
-39.29
-44.78
-40.75
-30.74
-19.31
-41.78
-37.75
-37.50
-48.00
7/19/17 5:00 PM
-39.35
-44.89
-40.33
-30.71
-17.57
-42.14
-37.28
-37.50
-48.00
7/20/17 5:00 AM
-39.82
-45.47
-40.69
-31.13
-17.74
-43.03
-38.06
-37.50
-48.00
7/20/17 5:00 PM
40.04
-45.78
-40.67
-31.19
-18.35
-43.42
-38.06
-37.50
-48.00
7/21/17 5:00 AM
-40.57
-46.36
-40.72
-31.43
-19.87
-43.58
-38.83
-37.50
-48.00
7/21/17 5:00 PM
40.26
-46.19
-40.25
-31.30
-20.03
-43.42
-38.36
-37.50
-47.81
7/22/17 5:00 AM
-41.06
-47.02
-40.75
-32.07
-22.11
-44.53
-38.58
-37.50
-48.00
7/22/17 5:00 PM
40.98
-46.94
-40.45
-32.04
-22.33
-44.58
-38.22
-37.50
-48.00
7/23/17 5:00 AM
-41.53
-47.82
-40.75
-32.74
-23.88
-45.55
-38.64
-37.50
-48.00
7/23/17 5:00 PM
-4.58
-39.27
-12.98
2.20
3.94
-4.33
-4.23
1.23
1.64
7/24/17 5:00 AM
-4.27
-9.32
-32.42
1.18
-0.74
-13.44
-13.09
-2.18
-37.34
7/24/17 5:00 PM
-15.21
-15.13
-39.81
0.85
-2.15
-22.05
-25.05
-17.96
-46.62
7/25/17 5:00 AM
-20.99
-19.84
-40.33
0.35
-3.20
-24.87
-27.07
-26.04
-48.00
7/25/17 5:00 PM
-24.59
-23.07
-39.89
0.24
-4.45
-25.95
-27.79
-28.86
-48.00
7/26/17 5:00 AM
-27.94
-26.45
-40.64
-0.40
-5.50
-27.61
-28.42
-31.60
-48.00
7/26/17 5:00 PM
-30.21
-28.75
-40.45
-0.70
-6.66
-28.08
-28.73
-32.68
-48.00
7/27/17 5:00 AM
-31.98
-30.63
-40.75
-1.26
-7.94
-29.19
-29.03
-34.04
-48.00
7/27/17 5:00 PM
-33.26
-32.02
-40.75
-2.01
-9.10
-29.49
-29.34
-34.37
-48.00
7/28/17 5:00 AM
-34.25
-33.26
-40.67
-3.25
-10.12
-30.35
-29.45
-35.48
-48.00
7/28/17 5:00 PM
-34.53
-33.82
-40.33
-5.27
-11.06
-30.54
-29.86
-35.65
-48.00
7/29/17 5:00 AM
-35.25
-34.95
-40.47
-5.74
-11.51
-31.51
-29.64
-36.72
-48.00
7/29/17 5:00 PM
-35.55
-35.98
-40.56
-9.59
-13.39
-32.98
-31.00
-37.20
-48.00
7/30/17 5:00 AM
-36.44
-37.19
-40.72
-15.57
-16.41
-35.39
-32.52
-37.42
-45.15
7/30/17 5:00 PM
-37.49
-38.63
-40.75
-19.28
-18.07
-36.39
-33.57
-37.50
-45.09
7/31/17 5:00 AM
-38.16
-39.55
-40.75
-22.13
-19.78
-37.83
-34.32
-37.50
-43.82
7/31/17 5:00 PM
-38.99
-40.32
-40.72
-24.07
-20.59
-38.68
-34.85
-37.50
-44.29
8/1/17 5:00 AM
-39.93
-40.82
-40.75
-25.59
-22.08
-40.21
-35.98
-37.50
-43.82
8/1/17 5:00 PM
40.45
-41.51
-40.75
-26.42
-22.77
-41.04
-36.37
-37.50
-44.43
8/2/17 5:00 AM
-40.57
-41.95
-40.75
-27.67
-23.80
-42.12
-37.06
-37.50
-43.76
8/2/17 5:00 PM
40.79
-42.79
-40.75
-28.78
-24.38
-43.11
-37.53
-37.50
-44.43
8/3/17 5:00 AM
-41.15
-43.45
-40.75
-29.91
-25.18
-44.22
-38.25
-37.50
-43.74
8/3/17 5:00 PM
41.48
-44.20
-40.75
-30.96
-25.71
-45.02
-38.81
-37.50
-44.26
8/4/17 5:00 AM
-41.56
-44.70
-40.75
-31.79
-26.04
-45.55
-38.83
-37.50
-44.40
8/4/17 5:00 PM
41.73
-45.03
-40.75
-32.49
-26.12
-45.94
-38.50
-37.50
-45.73
8/5/17 5:00 AM
-42.14
-45.53
-40.75
-33.57
-26.82
-46.77
-38.72
-37.50
-45.26
8/5/17 5:00 PM
41.98
-45.94
-40.53
-34.04
-26.90
-47.18
-38.42
-37.50
-45.34
8/6/17 5:00 AM
-42.67
-46.80
-40.75
-35.03
-27.62
-48.26
-38.70
-37.50
-44.21
8/6/17 5:00 PM
42.50
-46.83
-40.56
-35.28
-27.59
-48.54
-38.31
-37.50
-45.01
8/7/17 5:00 AM
-43.22
-47.52
-40.75
-36.20
-28.34
-49.48
-38.72
-37.50
-44.73
8/7/17 5:00 PM
43.42
-48.07
-40.75
-36.53
-28.23
-49.62
-38.61
-37.50
-46.01
8/8/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-48.24
-40.75
-36.80
-27.70
-50.03
-38.70
-37.50
-45.67
8/8/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-48.41
-40.75
-37.28
-27.23
-50.42
-38.56
-37.50
-44.84
8/9/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-48.96
-40.75
-37.94
-26.90
-50.89
-38.75
-37.50
-43.29
8/9/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-49.29
-40.75
-38.36
-26.24
-51.25
-38.75
-37.50
-43.13
8/10/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-49.57
-40.75
-38.91
-26.24
-51.53
-38.75
-37.50
-42.38
8/10/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-49.82
-40.75
-39.05
-25.90
-51.58
-38.61
-37.50
-43.10
8/11/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-50.34
-40.75
-39.46
-26.37
-52.00
-38.83
-37.50
-43.43
8/11/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-50.26
-40.75
-39.32
-26.54
-51.92
-38.50
-37.50
-44.65
8/12/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-50.87
-40.75
-39.63
-26.93
-52.00
-38.72
-37.50
-45.67
8/12/17 5:00 PM
43.39
-50.84
-40.75
-39.68
-27.12
-52.00
-38.53
-37.50
-46.81
8/13/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-51.04
-40.75
-38.88
-26.54
-50.84
-38.61
-37.50
-46.31
8/13/17 5:00 PM
43.06
-51.06
-40.58
-38.60
-25.54
-51.67
-38.31
-37.36
-46.17
8/14/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-51.76
-40.75
-39.60
-25.63
-52.00
-38.86
-37.50
-45.79
8/14/17 5:00 PM
43.39
-51.73
-40.75
-39.41
-25.16
-52.00
-38.56
-37.50
-46.62
8/15/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-51.92
-40.75
-39.24
-25.04
-52.00
-38.64
-37.50
-46.53

8/15/17 5:00 PM
43.14
-51.62
-40.72
-39.02
-24.35
-52.00
-38.28
-37.42
-46.84
8/16/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-52.47
-40.75
-39.71
-24.57
-51.89
-38.75
-37.50
-45.48
8/16/17 5:00 PM
43.20
-52.17
-40.58
-39.49
-23.83
-51.20
-38.11
-37.39
-45.51
8/17/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-52.70
-40.75
-40.18
-24.08
-51.75
-38.53
-37.50
-44.79
8/17/17 5:00 PM
42.97
-52.53
-40.53
40.07
-24.27
-51.31
-38.20
-37.28
-45.70
8/18/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-40.68
-25.46
-51.81
-38.72
-37.50
-46.15
8/18/17 5:00 PM
43.25
-53.03
-40.39
40.40
-25.46
-51.47
-38.28
-37.33
-47.09
8/19/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-41.04
-27.01
-51.81
-38.61
-37.50
-45.92
8/19/17 5:00 PM
43.20
-53.25
-40.64
40.99
-27.09
-51.47
-38.20
-37.47
-45.90
8/20/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.69
-41.46
-28.31
-51.78
-38.56
-37.50
-44.65
8/20/17 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.19
-40.25
41.35
-28.45
-51.25
-38.20
-37.28
-44.32
8/21/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-42.31
-29.89
-51.78
-38.72
-37.50
-42.93
8/21/17 5:00 PM
43.28
-53.25
-40.61
42.40
-29.92
-51.47
-38.36
-37.42
-43.38
8/22/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-43.09
-30.53
-51.78
-38.75
-37.50
-43.60
8/22/17 5:00 PM
43.39
-53.25
-40.61
42.98
-30.64
-51.58
-38.47
-37.47
-45.43
8/23/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-43.26
-31.25
-51.64
-38.67
-37.50
-46.34
8/23/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-43.59
-31.52
-51.75
-38.64
-37.50
-47.42
8/24/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.69
-43.70
-32.27
-51.72
-38.56
-37.50
-46.73
8/24/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.72
-43.89
-32.69
-51.83
-38.53
-37.50
-46.39
8/25/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-44.33
-33.21
-51.89
-38.67
-37.50
-44.68
8/25/17 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.25
-40.47
-44.39
-33.29
-51.67
-38.42
-37.50
-44.10
8/26/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.69
-44.78
-33.82
-51.78
-38.78
-37.50
-43.18
8/26/17 5:00 PM
43.42
-53.25
-40.47
-44.86
-34.01
-51.67
-38.47
-37.50
-43.85
8/27/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-45.19
-34.62
-51.92
-38.67
-37.50
-43.29
8/27/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
45.50
-34.98
-51.89
-38.75
-37.50
-44.35
8/28/17 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.61
-45.83
-35.34
-51.67
-38.58
-37.50
-44.04
8/28/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
46.05
-35.76
-51.83
-38.67
-37.50
-45.15
8/29/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.64
-46.33
-36.23
-51.81
-38.64
-37.50
-45.95
8/29/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.64
46.58
-36.70
-51.81
-38.64
-37.50
-45.34
8/30/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-46.88
-37.39
-51.86
-38.72
-37.50
-44.48
8/30/17 5:00 PM
43.33
-53.25
-40.42
46.96
-37.50
-51.61
-38.50
-37.50
-44.71
8/31/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-47.44
-38.17
-51.89
-38.61
-37.50
-44.26
8/31/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.61
40.76
-37.23
-50.20
-38.70
-37.50
-44.59
9/1/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.61
-40.99
-30.22
-52.00
-38.75
-37.50
-45.26
9/1/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-38.84
-2.98
-10.73
-36.50
-28.45
-2.40
-46.51
9/2/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.09
-31.68
-24.52
-51.83
-38.61
-27.87
-45.09
9/2/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-39.86
-37.41
-25.76
-51.81
-38.75
-34.26
-45.62
9/3/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.09
-40.46
-26.62
-51.94
-38.75
-37.50
-44.46
9/3/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.14
42.70
-27.15
-52.00
-38.78
-37.50
-44.48
9/4/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.17
44.11
-27.54
-52.00
-38.72
-37.50
-44.01
9/4/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.17
44.75
-28.15
-51.92
-38.78
-37.50
-45.09
9/5/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.20
45.22
-28.42
-51.92
-38.70
-37.50
-45.51
9/5/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.31
45.00
-28.67
-52.00
-38.70
-37.50
-47.31
9/6/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.25
45.55
-29.11
-52.00
-38.72
-37.50
-47.06
9/6/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.20
45.77
-29.47
-52.00
-38.81
-37.50
-46.51
9/7/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.39
46.74
-29.86
-52.00
-38.94
-37.50
-44.65
9/7/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.53
47.82
-30.33
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-44.29
9/8/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.58
48.68
-30.53
-52.00
-38.94
-37.50
-42.85
9/8/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.69
-50.01
-31.05
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-43.16
9/9/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.25
-50.26
-30.94
-52.00
-38.78
-37.50
-42.30
9/9/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.50
-51.01
-31.19
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-42.63
9/10/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.47
-51.06
-31.52
-52.00
-38.97
-37.50
-41.55
9/10/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-51.67
-31.83
-52.00
-38.97
-37.50
-41.83
9/11/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-51.95
-31.83
-51.97
-38.94
-37.50
-43.21
9/11/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.33
-43.34
-5.36
-48.37
-35.54
-37.50
-46.37
9/12/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-2.56
-1.32
-20.86
-6.97
-37.50
-47.97
9/12/17 5:00 PM
40.07
-53.25
-40.28
-3.56
-4.92
-36.16
-17.21
-31.33
-47.67
9/13/17 5:00 AM
-39.87
-53.25
-40.14
-12.42
-9.82
-41.62
-24.96
-36.36
-46.28
9/13/17 5:00 PM
40.18
-53.25
-40.33
-19.34
-13.69
-43.00
-29.14
-37.50
-46.78
9/14/17 5:00 AM
-40.51
-53.25
-40.17
-21.99
-14.55
-44.28
-31.39
-37.50
-45.95
9/14/17 5:00 PM
40.76
-53.25
-40.14
-24.85
-16.74
-44.41
-33.10
-37.50
-45.92
9/15/17 5:00 AM
-41.37
-53.25
-40.31
-27.25
-17.60
-45.27
-34.13
-37.50
-44.73
9/15/17 5:00 PM
41.59
-53.25
-40.20
-29.47
-19.48
-45.41
-35.10
-37.50
-44.54
9/16/17 5:00 AM
-41.89
-53.25
-40.28
-31.52
-19.90
-45.74
-35.21
-37.50
-43.88
9/16/17 5:00 PM
42.09
-53.25
-40.25
-32.71
-21.36
-45.49
-35.71
-37.50
-44.18
9/17/17 5:00 AM
-42.48
-53.25
-40.33
-33.34
-21.78
-45.85
-35.51
-37.50
-43.79
9/17/17 5:00 PM
42.61
-53.25
-40.33
-34.70
-22.77
-45.88
-36.20
-37.50
-44.93
9/18/17 5:00 AM
-42.92
-53.25
-40.47
-35.28
-23.36
-45.91
-35.90
-37.50
-44.68
9/18/17 5:00 PM
43.11
-53.25
40.47
-36.22
-24.30
-45.99
-36.65
-37.50
-45.48
9/19/17 5:00 AM
-43.31
-53.25
40.42
-36.75
-24.74
-45.99
-36.09
-37.50
-45.04
9/19/17 5:00 PM
43.31
-53.25
40.42
-37.41
-25.57
-46.05
-36.98
-37.50
-45.73
9/20/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.50
-38.16
-26.24
-46.27
-36.59
-37.50
-45.26
9/20/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.31
-38.60
-26.76
-46.30
-37.34
-37.50
-45.84
9/21/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.56
-39.57
-27.70
-47.24
-37.42
-37.50
-44.82
9/21/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.36
-39.99
-27.87
-46.91
-38.00
-37.50
-45.45
9/22/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.61
40.82
-28.70
-47.85
-38.06
-37.50
-44.32
9/22/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.31
41.04
-28.92
-47.52
-38.39
-37.50
-45.34
9/23/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.53
41.68
-29.59
-48.01
-38.42
-37.50
-44.79
9/23/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.42
41.84
-29.92
-48.23
-38.72
-37.50
-44.98
9/24/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.58
42.65
-30.72
-48.90
-38.86
-37.50
-44.32
9/24/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.53
42.98
-30.97
-49.20
-38.81
-37.50
-45.07
9/25/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.53
-43.17
-31.52
-49.40
-38.75
-37.50
-45.29
9/25/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.58
-43.34
-31.66
-49.51
-38.72
-37.50
-46.48
9/26/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.58
-43.39
-31.97
-49.87
-38.78
-37.50
-46.17
9/26/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.61
-43.42
-32.08
-50.09
-38.72
-37.50
-46.89
9/27/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.58
-43.73
-32.66
-50.37
-38.67
-37.50
-46.42
9/27/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.67
-44.11
-32.85
-50.64
-38.72
-37.50
-47.36
9/28/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.64
-44.78
-33.52
-50.84
-38.72
-37.50
-46.42
9/28/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-44.86
-33.85
-51.36
-38.53
-37.50
-46.95
9/29/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.69
-45.91
-34.51
-51.92
-38.75
-37.50
-44.84
9/29/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.72
-46.74
-35.18
-52.00
-38.86
-37.50
-45.09
9/30/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.64
-47.52
-35.73
-52.00
-38.64
-37.50
-43.24
9/30/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-48.57
-36.23
-52.00
-38.86
-37.50
-43.32
10/1/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.72
-49.40
-36.92
-52.00
-38.86
-37.50
-40.97

10/1/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-50.34
-37.56
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.94
10/2/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-50.62
-38.11
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-40.72
10/2/17 5:00 PM
43.39
-53.25
-40.28
-50.79
-37.86
-51.50
-38.70
-37.50
-40.77
10/3/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.47
-51.64
-38.67
-52.00
-38.81
-37.50
-39.20
10/3/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.47
-52.31
-39.14
-52.00
-38.92
-37.50
-39.39
10/4/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-52.72
-39.47
-52.00
-38.97
-37.50
-38.89
10/4/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.56
-53.00
-39.69
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.00
10/5/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.42
-53.00
-39.72
-52.00
-38.89
-37.50
-41.55
10/5/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.31
-52.97
-39.75
-51.94
-38.97
-37.50
-43.21
10/6/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.47
-53.00
-40.08
-52.00
-38.86
-37.50
-42.77
10/6/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-53.00
40.13
-51.97
-38.81
-37.50
-44.68
10/7/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.36
-53.00
-40.44
-51.94
-38.83
-37.50
-44.23
10/7/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.45
-53.00
40.96
-51.92
-38.72
-37.50
-45.15
10/8/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.53
-53.00
-41.07
-52.00
-38.83
-37.50
-45.07
10/8/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.39
-53.00
41.24
-51.89
-38.75
-37.50
-46.73
10/9/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.50
-53.00
-41.30
-51.97
-38.67
-37.50
-45.92
10/9/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.53
-53.00
41.82
-51.72
-38.78
-37.50
-45.43
10/10/17 5:00 AM
-43.42
-53.25
-40.67
-53.00
41.90
-51.75
-38.72
-37.50
-44.26
10/10/17 5:00 PM
43.36
-53.25
-40.61
-53.00
42.29
-52.00
-38.67
-37.50
-44.65
10/11/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
42.93
-52.00
-38.83
-37.50
-44.48
10/11/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
43.01
-52.00
-38.78
-37.50
-45.15
10/12/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.72
-53.00
43.45
-52.00
-38.78
-37.50
-44.84
10/12/17 5:00 PM
43.44
-53.25
-40.72
-53.00
43.95
-51.75
-38.58
-37.50
-44.46
10/13/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.72
-53.00
44.48
-51.86
-38.81
-37.50
-42.38
10/13/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.53
-53.00
45.03
-51.89
-38.67
-37.50
-41.80
10/14/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.64
-53.00
45.23
-51.86
-38.70
-37.50
-41.74
10/14/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.75
-53.00
45.70
-51.97
-38.81
-37.50
-42.88
10/15/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.69
-53.00
46.03
-52.00
-38.72
-37.50
-42.80
10/15/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.56
-53.00
45.95
-51.78
-38.70
-37.50
-44.79
10/16/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.61
-53.00
46.42
-52.00
-38.89
-37.50
-45.56
10/16/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-38.89
-37.50
-43.74
10/17/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.44
10/17/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.47
10/18/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-40.69
10/18/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
-40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.36
10/19/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.72
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.16
10/19/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.75
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-42.44
10/20/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.69
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.94
10/20/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.58
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-42.77
10/21/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.45
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.63
10/21/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.47
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-41.38
10/22/17 -1 0 AM
-43.50
-53.25
-40.28
-53.00
-46.50
-52.00
-38.97
-37.50
-40.80
10/22/17 5:00 PM
43.50
-53.25
40.42
-53.00
46.50
-52.00
-39.00
-37.50
-42.02
10/23/17 5:00 AM
-43.50
-53.25
40.31
-53.00
46.50
-51.94
-38.94
-37.50
-43.79

:ct:
Deep Meadow MitigationSite
Project ID:
97131
and Component:
Pre-construction Rain Gage Data
✓ing Season:
March 23 to November 6
January 4, 2016
Inches
Je Type
Rain
Serial # N/A
Gauge Rain
Source: Monroe , NC; USCO0315771
Date
Amount
January 1, 2016
0.15
January 2, 2016
0.00
January 3, 2016
0.00
January 4, 2016
0.00
January 5, 2016
0.00
January 6, 2016
0.00
January 7, 2016
0.00
January 8, 2016
0.00
January 9, 2016
0.00
January 10, 2016
0.20
January 11, 2016
0.00
January 12, 2016
0.00
January 13, 2016
0.00
January 14, 2016
0.00
January 15, 2016
0.00
January 16, 2016
0.69
January 17, 2016
0.03
January 18, 2016
0.04
January 19, 2016
0.00
January 20, 2016
0.00
January 21, 2016
0.00
January 22, 2016
0.28
January 23, 2016
0.70
January 24, 2016
0.00
January 25, 2016
0.00
January 26, 2016
0.00
January 27, 2016
0.00
January 28, 2016
0.00
January 29, 2016
0.00
January 30, 2016
0.00
January 31, 2016
0.00
February 1, 2016
0.00
February 2, 2016
0.00
February 3, 2016
0.00
February 4, 2016
0.88
February 5, 2016
0.00
February 6, 2016
0.00
February 7, 2016
0.00
February 8, 2016
0.00
February 9, 2016
0.00
February 10, 2016
0.00
February 11, 2016
0.00
February 12, 2016
0.00
February 13, 2016
0.00
February 14, 2016
0.00
February 15, 2016
0.00
February 16, 2016
1.00
February 17, 2016
0.03
February 18, 2016
0.00
February 19, 2016
0.00
February 20, 2016
0.00
February 21, 2016
0.00
February 22, 2016
0.00
February 23, 2016
0.59
February 24, 2016
0.35
February 25, 2016
0.22
February 26, 2016
0.00
February 27, 2016
0.00
February 28, 2016
0.00
February 29, 2016
0.03
March 1, 2016
0.00
March 2, 2016
0.12
March 3, 2016
0.00
March 4, 2016
0.08
March 5, 2016
0.00
March 6, 2016
0.00
March 7, 2016
0.00
March 8, 2016
0.00
March 9, 2016
0.00
March 10, 2016
0.00
March 11, 2016
0.00
March 12, 2016
0.00
March 13, 2016
0.00
March 14, 2016
0.65

March 15, 2016
0.20
March 16, 2016
0.00
March 17, 2016
0.00
March 18, 2016
0.00
March 19, 2016
0.00
March 20, 2016
0.07
March 21, 2016
0.10
March 22, 2016
0.00
March 23, 2016
0.00
March 24, 2016
0.00
March 25, 2016
0.00
March 26, 2016
0.00
March 27, 2016
0.60
March 28, 2016
0.60
March 29, 2016
0.00
March 30, 2016
0.00
March 31, 2016
0.00
April 1, 2016
0.30
April 2, 2016
0.12
April 3, 2016
0.04
April 4, 2016
0.00
April 5, 2016
0.00
April 6, 2016
0.00
April 7, 2016
0.10
April 8, 2016
0.00
April 9, 2016
0.00
April 10, 2016
0.00
April 11, 2016
0.00
April 12, 2016
0.00
April 13, 2016
0.13
April 14, 2016
0.00
April 15, 2016
0.00
April 16, 2016
0.00
April 17, 2016
0.00
April 18, 2016
0.00
April 19, 2016
0.00
April 20, 2016
0.00
April 21, 2016
0.00
April 22, 2016
0.00
April 23, 2016
0.10
April 24, 2016
0.00
April 25, 2016
0.00
April 26, 2016
0.00
April 27, 2016
0.00
April 28, 2016
0.00
April 29, 2016
0.00
April 30, 2016
0.00
May 1, 2016
0.08
May 2, 2016
1.00
May 3, 2016
1.10
May 4, 2016
0.02
May 5, 2016
0.00
May 6, 2016
0.17
May 7, 2016
0.00
May 8, 2016
0.00
May 9, 2016
0.00
May 10, 2016
0.00
May 11, 2016
0.00
May 12, 2016
0.00
May 13, 2016
0.65
May 14, 2016
0.00
May 15, 2016
0.00
May 16, 2016
0.00
May 17, 2016
0.00
May 18, 2016
0.28
May 19, 2016
0.53
May 20, 2016
0.53
May 21, 2016
0.53
May 22, 2016
0.15
May 23, 2016
0.00
May 24, 2016
0.00
May 25, 2016
0.00
May 26, 2016
0.00
May 27, 2016
0.00
May 28, 2016
0.00
May 29, 2016
0.08
May 30, 2016
0.12
May 31, 2016
0.00
June 1, 2016
0.00
June 2, 2016
0.00
June 3, 2016
0.12
June 4, 2016
0.00
June 5, 2016
1.30
June 6, 2016
0.30
June 7, 2016
0.20
June 8, 2016
0.00
June 9, 2016
0.00

June 10, 2016
0.00
June 11, 2016
0.00
June 12, 2016
0.00
June 13, 2016
0.00
June 14, 2016
0.00
June 15, 2016
0.77
June 16, 2016
0.00
June 17, 2016
0.00
June 18, 2016
0.00
June 19, 2016
0.00
June 20, 2016
0.00
June 21, 2016
0.00
June 22, 2016
0.00
June 23, 2016
0.00
June 24, 2016
0.01
June 25, 2016
0.00
June 26, 2016
0.00
June 27, 2016
0.00
June 28, 2016
0.18
June 29, 2016
0.00
June 30, 2016
0.67
July 1, 2016
0.00
July 2, 2016
0.00
July 3, 2016
0.00
July 4, 2016
0.00
July 5, 2016
0.28
July 6, 2016
0.21
July 7, 2016
0.00
July 8, 2016
0.00
July 9, 2016
0.58
July 10, 2016
0.00
July 11, 2016
0.00
July 12, 2016
0.80
July 13, 2016
0.00
July 14, 2016
0.00
July 15, 2016
0.00
July 16, 2016
0.72
July 17, 2016
0.25
July 18, 2016
0.00
July 19, 2016
0.00
July 20, 2016
0.14
July 21, 2016
0.00
July 22, 2016
0.00
July 23, 2016
0.00
July 24, 2016
0.00
July 25, 2016
0.00
July 26, 2016
0.00
July 27, 2016
0.00
July 28, 2016
0.00
July 29, 2016
0.00
July 30, 2016
0.00
July 31, 2016
0.00
August 1, 2016
0.00
August 2, 2016
0.20
August 3, 2016
0.03
August 4, 2016
0.00
August 5, 2016
0.10
August 6, 2016
0.19
August 7, 2016
0.00
August 8, 2016
0.29
August 9, 2016
0.40
August 10, 2016
0.05
August 11, 2016
0.17
August 12, 2016
0.05
August 13, 2016
0.00
August 14, 2016
0.00
August 15, 2016
0.00
August 16, 2016
0.00
August 17, 2016
0.00
August 18, 2016
0.00
August 19, 2016
0.79
August 20, 2016
0.00
August 21, 2016
0.00
August 22, 2016
0.00
August 23, 2016
0.00
August 24, 2016
0.00
August 25, 2016
0.00
August 26, 2016
0.00
August 27, 2016
0.00
August 28, 2016
0.18
August 29, 2016
0.00
August 30, 2016
0.00
August 31, 2016
0.00
September 1, 2016
0.80
September 2, 2016
0.80
September 3, 2016
0.80
September 4, 2016
0.00

September 5, 2016
0.00
September 6, 2016
0.00
September 7, 2016
0.00
September 8, 2016
0.00
September 9, 2016
0.00
September 10, 2016
0.00
September 11, 2016
0.00
September 12, 2016
0.00
September 13, 2016
0.00
September 14, 2016
0.00
September 15, 2016
0.00
September 16, 2016
0.00
September 17, 2016
0.00
September 18, 2016
0.00
September 19, 2016
0.00
September 20, 2016
0.15
September 21, 2016
0.15
September 22, 2016
0.28
September 23, 2016
0.05
September 24, 2016
0.01
September 25, 2016
0.00
September 26, 2016
0.00
September 27, 2016
0.05
September 28, 2016
0.00
September 29, 2016
0.83
September 30, 2016
0.00
October 1, 2016
0.00
October 2, 2016
0.00
October 3, 2016
0.00
October 4, 2016
0.00
October 5, 2016
0.00
October 6, 2016
0.00
October 7, 2016
0.05
October 8, 2016
4.10
October 9, 2016
1.65
October 10, 2016
0.00
October 11, 2016
0.00
October 12, 2016
0.00
October 13, 2016
0.00
October 14, 2016
0.00
October 15, 2016
0.00
October 16, 2016
0.00
October 17, 2016
0.00
October 18, 2016
0.00
October 19, 2016
0.00
October 20, 2016
0.00
October 21, 2016
0.00
October 22, 2016
0.00
October 23, 2016
0.00
October 24, 2016
0.00
October 25, 2016
0.00
October 26, 2016
0.00
October 27, 2016
0.00
October 28, 2016
0.00
October 29, 2016
0.00
October 30, 2016
0.00
October 31, 2016
0.00
November 1, 2016
0.00
November 2, 2016
0.00
November 3, 2016
0.00
November 4, 2016
0.00
November 5, 2016
0.00
November 6, 2016
0.00
November 7, 2016
0.00
November 8, 2016
0.00
November 9, 2016
0.00
November 10, 2016
0.00
November 11, 2016
0.00
November 12, 2016
0.00
November 13, 2016
0.00
November 14, 2016
0.10
November 15, 2016
0.00
November 16, 2016
0.00
November 17, 2016
0.00
November 18, 2016
0.00
November 19, 2016
0.00
November 20, 2016
0.00
November 21, 2016
0.00
November 22, 2016
0.00
November 23, 2016
0.00
November 24, 2016
0.00
November 25, 2016
0.00
November 26, 2016
0.00
November 27, 2016
0.00
November 28, 2016
0.00
November 29, 2016
0.02
November 30, 2016
0.10

December 1, 2016
0.30
December 2, 2016
0.00
December 3, 2016
0.00
December 4, 2016
0.04
December 5, 2016
0.71
December 6, 2016
0.30
December 7, 2016
0.24
December 8, 2016
0.00
December 9, 2016
0.00
December 10, 2016
0.00
December 11, 2016
0.00
December 12, 2016
0.02
December 13, 2016
0.00
December 14, 2016
0.05
December 15, 2016
0.00
December 16, 2016
0.00
December 17, 2016
0.00
December 18, 2016
0.01
December 19, 2016
0.60
December 20, 2016
0.10
December 21, 2016
0.00
December 22, 2016
0.00
December 23, 2016
0.00
December 24, 2016
0.00
December 25, 2016
0.00
December 26, 2016
0.00
December 27, 2016
0.00
December 28, 2016
0.00
December 29, 2016
0.70
December 30, 2016
0.00
December 31, 2016
0.00
January 1, 2017
0.05
January 2, 2017
1.00
January 3, 2017
1.05
January 4, 2017
0.03
January 5, 2017
0.00
January 6, 2017
0.00
January 7, 2017
1.00
January 8, 2017
0.01
January 9, 2017
0.00
January 10, 2017
0.00
January 11, 2017
0.03
January 12, 2017
0.02
January 13, 2017
0.00
January 14, 2017
0.00
January 15, 2017
0.00
January 16, 2017
0.00
January 17, 2017
0.00
January 18, 2017
0.00
January 19, 2017
0.00
January 20, 2017
0.05
January 21, 2017
0.00
January 22, 2017
0.90
January 23, 2017
1.35
January 24, 2017
0.00
January 25, 2017
0.00
January 26, 2017
0.02
January 27, 2017
0.00
January 28, 2017
0.00
January 29, 2017
0.00
January 30, 2017
0.00
January 31, 2017
0.00
February 1, 2017
0.00
February 2, 2017
0.00
February 3, 2017
0.05
February 4, 2017
0.00
February 5, 2017
0.00
February 6, 2017
0.00
February 7, 2017
0.00
February 8, 2017
0.38
February 9, 2017
0.13
February 10, 2017
0.00
February 11, 2017
0.00
February 12, 2017
0.00
February 13, 2017
0.00
February 14, 2017
0.00
February 15, 2017
0.00
February 16, 2017
0.74
February 17, 2017
0.00
February 18, 2017
0.00
February 19, 2017
0.01
February 20, 2017
0.00
February 21, 2017
0.00
February 22, 2017
0.00
February 23, 2017
0.00
February 24, 2017
0.00
February 25, 2017
0.00

February 26, 2017
0.00
February 27, 2017
0.00
February 28, 2017
0.00
March 1, 2017
0.00
March 2, 2017
0.35
March 3, 2017
0.00
March 4, 2017
0.00
March 5, 2017
0.00
March 6, 2017
0.00
March 7, 2017
0.00
March 8, 2017
0.05
March 9, 2017
0.00
March 10, 2017
0.13
March 11, 2017
0.00
March 12, 2017
0.37
March 13, 2017
0.15
March 14, 2017
0.71
March 15, 2017
0.02
March 16, 2017
0.00
March 17, 2017
0.00
March 18, 2017
0.01
March 19, 2017
0.32
March 20, 2017
0.00
March 21, 2017
0.00
March 22, 2017
0.00
March 23, 2017
0.00
March 24, 2017
0.00
March 25, 2017
0.00
March 26, 2017
0.00
March 27, 2017
0.06
March 28, 2017
0.18
March 29, 2017
0.00
March 30, 2017
0.00
March 31, 2017
0.27
April 1, 2017
0.03
April 2, 2017
0.00
April 3, 2017
0.00
April 4, 2017
0.88
April 5, 2017
0.00
April 6, 2017
1.12
April 7, 2017
0.00
April 8, 2017
0.00
April 9, 2017
0.00
April 10, 2017
0.00
April 11, 2017
0.00
April 12, 2017
0.00
April 13, 2017
0.00
April 14, 2017
0.00
April 15, 2017
0.00
April 16, 2017
0.00
April 17, 2017
0.00
April 18, 2017
0.03
April 19, 2017
0.00
April 20, 2017
0.07
April 21, 2017
0.00
April 22, 2017
0.00
April 23, 2017
0.09
April 24, 2017
2.10
April 25, 2017
1.90
April 26, 2017
0.04
April 27, 2017
0.00
April 28, 2017
0.01
April 29, 2017
0.00
April 30, 2017
0.00
May 1, 2017
0.00
May 2, 2017
0.45
May 3, 2017
0.00
May 4, 2017
0.00
May 5, 2017
1.35
May 6, 2017
0.00
May 7, 2017
0.05
May 8, 2017
0.00
May 9, 2017
0.00
May 10, 2017
0.00
May 11, 2017
0.00
May 12, 2017
0.00
May 13, 2017
0.27
May 14, 2017
0.00
May 15, 2017
0.00
May 16, 2017
0.00
May 17, 2017
0.00
May 18, 2017
0.00
May 19, 2017
0.00
May 20, 2017
0.00
May 21, 2017
0.00
May 22, 2017
0.00
May 23, 2017
0.00

May 24, 2017
1.35
May 25, 2017
1.50
May 26, 2017
0.00
May 27, 2017
0.00
May 28, 2017
0.00
May 29, 2017
0.00
May 30, 2017
0.00
May 31, 2017
0.00
June 1, 2017
0.05
June 2, 2017
0.00
June 3, 2017
0.00
June 4, 2017
0.00
June 5, 2017
1.35
June 6, 2017
0.15
June 7, 2017
0.00
June 8, 2017
0.00
June 9, 2017
0.00
June 10, 2017
0.00
June 11, 2017
0.00
June 12, 2017
0.00
June 13, 2017
0.00
June 14, 2017
0.08
June 15, 2017
0.00
June 16, 2017
0.20
June 17, 2017
0.70
June 18, 2017
0.00
June 19, 2017
0.08
June 20, 2017
3.45
June 21, 2017
1.87
June 22, 2017
0.07
June 23, 2017
0.05
June 24, 2017
0.00
June 25, 2017
0.03
June 26, 2017
0.00
June 27, 2017
0.00
June 28, 2017
0.00
June 29, 2017
0.00
June 30, 2017
0.00
July 1, 2017
0.03
July 2, 2017
0.28
July 3, 2017
0.00
July 4, 2017
1.20
July 5, 2017
0.00
July 6, 2017
0.00
July 7, 2017
0.00
July 8, 2017
0.00
July 9, 2017
0.10
July 10, 2017
0.00
July 11, 2017
0.00
July 12, 2017
0.00
July 13, 2017
0.00
July 14, 2017
0.00
July 15, 2017
0.00
July 16, 2017
0.02
July 17, 2017
0.00
July 18, 2017
0.00
July 19, 2017
0.00
July 20, 2017
0.00
July 21, 2017
1.37
July 22, 2017
0.00
July 23, 2017
0.00
July 24, 2017
1.67
July 25, 2017
0.00
July 26, 2017
0.00
July 27, 2017
0.00
July 28, 2017
0.00
July 29, 2017
0.27
July 30, 2017
0.00
July 31, 2017
0.00
August 1, 2017
0.00
August 2, 2017
0.00
August 3, 2017
0.00
August 4, 2017
0.00
August 5, 2017
0.01
August 6, 2017
0.00
August 7, 2017
0.17
August 8, 2017
0.39
August 9, 2017
0.08
August 10, 2017
0.00
August 11, 2017
0.00
August 12, 2017
0.29
August 13, 2017
0.02
August 14, 2017
0.00
August 15, 2017
1.15
August 16, 2017
0.08
August 17, 2017
0.00
August 18, 2017
0.05

August 19, 2017
0.23
August 20, 2017
0.00
August 21, 2017
0.00
August 22, 2017
0.00
August 23, 2017
0.03
August 24, 2017
0.04
August 25, 2017
0.03
August 26, 2017
0.00
August 27, 2017
0.00
August 28, 2017
0.00
August 29, 2017
0.05
August 30, 2017
0.00
August 31, 2017
0.05
September 1, 2017
1.60
September 2, 2017
0.24
September 3, 2017
0.00
September 4, 2017
0.00
September 5, 2017
0.00
September 6, 2017
0.00
September 7, 2017
0.40
September 8, 2017
0.00
September 9, 2017
0.00
September 10, 2017
0.00
September 11, 2017
0.00
September 12, 2017
1.71
September 13, 2017
0.00
September 14, 2017
0.00
September 15, 2017
0.00
September 16, 2017
0.00
September 17, 2017
0.00
September 18, 2017
0.00
September 19, 2017
0.00
September 20, 2017
0.00
September 21, 2017
0.00
September 22, 2017
0.00
September 23, 2017
0.00
September 24, 2017
0.00
September 25, 2017
0.00
September 26, 2017
0.00
September 27, 2017
0.00
September 28, 2017
0.00
September 29, 2017
0.00
September 30, 2017
0.00
October 1, 2017
0.00
October 2, 2017
0.00
October 3, 2017
0.00
October 4, 2017
0.00
October 5, 2017
0.00
October 6, 2017
0.00
October 7, 2017
0.00
October 8, 2017
0.00
October 9, 2017
0.22
October 10, 2017
0.00
October 11, 2017
0.10
October 12, 2017
0.00
October 13, 2017
0.00
October 14, 2017
0.05
October 15, 2017
0.00
October 16, 2017
0.01
October 17, 2017
0.26
October 18, 2017
0.00
October 19, 2017
0.00
October 20, 2017
0.00
October 21, 2017
0.00
October 22, 2017
0.00
October 23, 2017
0.00
October 24, 2017
0.00
October 25, 2017
0.00
October 26, 2017
0.00
October 27, 2017
0.00
October 28, 2017
0.00
October 29, 2017
0.00
October 30, 2017
0.00
October 31, 2017
0.00

APPENDIX 5
APPROVED FHWA CATEGORICAL EXLUSION FORM

Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
rro ect Name:
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
County Name:
Union County
EEP Number:
97131
Project Sponsor:
Wildlands Engineering, tnc
Project Contact Name:
Andrea S. Eckardt
Project Contact Address:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
Project Contact E—mail:
aeckardt@wRdlandseng,com
EEP Project Manaaer:
Harry Tsomides
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is a stream and wetland mitigation project located 2 miles north of the Town of
Wingate and approximately 6 miles northeast of the City of Monroe, In Union County, NC. The project contains
Meadow Branch and tts tributaries, which flow to Richardson Creek, for a total of more than 4,287 linear feet of
stream. Historically, the agricultural parcel has been used for row crop production. The project will provide stream
and wetland mitigation units to the Division of Mitigation Services in the Yadkin River Basin (03040105).
Reviewed By:
f A
E
Date D..,.s..4d6s.,... ---
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question ..
Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Does the project involve ground -disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
❑ Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
❑ Yes
Program?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabilit Act CERCLA
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
0 No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
❑ Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
[Z] No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ No
0 N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑ No
0 N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
❑ Yes
Historic Places in the project area?
0 No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Uniform
Act
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
✓❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
✓❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
p Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
❑ No
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
❑ N/A

Part 3: Ground -Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question
..
American Indian Religious Freedom Act AIRFA
1.
Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of
❑ Yes
Cherokee
Indians?
❑✓ No
2.
Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3.
Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
❑ Yes
Places?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4.
Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1.
Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2.
Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
❑ Yes
of antiquity?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3.
Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4.
Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Archaeoloqical Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1.
Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2.
Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3.
Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
4.
Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Endangered Species Act ESA
1.
Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
✓❑ Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2.
Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3.
Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
❑✓ No
❑ N/A
4.
Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the species and/or "likely to adversely modify"
❑ Yes
Designated
Critical Habitat?
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
5.
Does the USFWS/NOAH-Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
6.
Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A

Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
❑ Yes
by the EBCI?
❑✓ No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
❑ Yes
project?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
❑ Yes
sites?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired?
✓❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
❑✓ Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS?
✓❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
❑✓ Yes
water body?
❑ No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
❑✓ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
❑ Yes
outdoor recreation?
✓❑ No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
❑ Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
✓❑ N/A
Migratory Bird Treat Act MBTA
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑✓ N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
❑✓ No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
❑ Yes
federal agency?
❑ No
❑✓ N/A

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
Summary

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides a
Federal "Superfund" to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous -waste sites as well as accidents,
spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.
As the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is a full -delivery project; an EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck
was ordered for the site through Environmental Data Resources, Inc on August 16, 2016. While the
target property was not listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched
by EDR, one North Carolina Hazardous Substance Disposal Site (NC HSDS) and one Leaking Aboveground
Storage Tank (LAST) were identified within one mile of the project area. The NC HSDS site is the Union
County landfill located at 2125 Austin Chaney Road which is 0.65 miles northwest of the Deep Meadow
Creek project area. The landfill is located outside of the contributing watershed. The leaking
aboveground storage tank site is described as a fuel spill on Olive Branch Road however no further
information or site location was available. Olive Branch Road is located approximately 0.25 miles
downstream of the project area.
Overall, the EDR assessment revealed no evidence of any "recognized environmental conditions" in
connection with the target property. The Executive Summary of the EDR report is included in the
Appendix. The full report is available if needed.
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American
architecture, history, archaeology, and culture, and Section 106 mandates that federal agencies take
into account the effect of an undertaking on a property that is included in, or is eligible for inclusion in,
the National Register of Historic Places.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) requested review and comment from the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) with respect to any archeological and architectural resources related to the
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site on August 10, 2016. SHPO responded on August 29, 2016 and stated they
were aware of "no historic resources which would be affected by the project" and would have no
further comment. All correspondence related to Section 106 is included in the Appendix.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
These acts, collectively known as the Uniform Act, provide for uniform and equitable treatment of
persons displaced from their homes, businesses, non-profit associations, or farms by federal and
federally -assisted programs, and establish uniform and equitable land acquisition policies.
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is a full -delivery project that includes land acquisition. Notification of the
fair market value of the project property and the lack of condemnation authority by Wildlands was
included in the signed option agreements for the project properties. A copy of the relevant section of
the option agreement is included in the Appendix.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies, in consultation with and with the assistance of the
Secretary of the Interior or of Commerce, as appropriate, to ensure that actions they authorize, fund or
carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for these species.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion Summary Page 1

The Union County listed federally endangered species includes the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona
decorate), the Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) and the Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). The United States Fish and Wildlands Service (USFWS) currently lists Critical Habitat
Designations for the Carolina heelsplitter in Union County as well.
Mapped critical habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter is found in three locations in Union County: the
main stem of Goose Creek (Pee Dee River system), from the N.C. Highway 218 Bridge downstream to its
confluence with the Rocky River; the main stem of Duck Creek, from the Mecklenburg/Union County line
downstream to its confluence with Goose Creek; and the main stem of Waxhaw Creek (Catawba River
system), from the N.C.Highway 200 Bridge downstream to the North Carolina/South Carolina State line.
As shown on the attached Heelsplitter Critical Habitat (Figure 2), the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is
over 10 miles from the mapped critical habitat locations and is not located upstream of any of the
locations. Based on the proposed project's location, Wildlands determined that the Deep Meadow Site
will have "no effect" on existing designated critical habitat.
As a result of pedestrian survey conducted on February 29, 2016 suitable habitat for the Schweinitz's
sunflower was identified in small areas along the forest edges. There was no suitable habitat found in
the project area for the other two listed species. A second survey, performed on August 10, 2016, found
no individual species in the project area for the listed species. It was determined that the project would
result in "no effect" on any of the listed species.
Wildlands requested review and comment from the USFWS on August 10, 2016 in respect to the Deep
Meadow Mitigation Site and its potential impacts on federally listed species or critical habitat. USFWS
provided comments on October 20, 2016 stating they consider "the requirements under the Act to be
complete and require no further action at this time". Correspondence with USFWS is included in the
Appendix.
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
The FPPA requires that, before taking or approving any federal action that would result in conversion of
farmland, the agency must examine the effects of the action using the criteria set forth in the FPPA, and,
if there are adverse effects, must consider alternatives to lessen them.
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site includes the conversion of prime farmland. As such, Form AD -1006
has been completed and submitted to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The
completed form and correspondence documenting its submittal is included in the Appendix.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
The FWCA requires consultation with the USFWS and the appropriate state wildlife agency on projects
that alter or modify a water body. Reports and recommendations prepared by these agencies document
project effects on wildlife and identify measures that may be adopted to prevent loss or damage to
wildlife resources.
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site includes stream restoration, as such Wildlands requested comment
on the project from both the USFWS and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on
August 10, 2016. NCWRC responded on October 14, 2016 and had no objections to the proposed
project. USFWS also had no objections to the proposed project and provided design recommendations
related to stream channel restoration activities, stream buffers, and invasive exotic species in their
October 20, 2016 response. Correspondence with the two agencies is included in the Appendix.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion Summary Page 2

Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
The MBTA makes it unlawful for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell, trade, ship, import, or
export any migratory bird. The indirect killing of birds by destroying their nests and eggs is covered by
the MBTA, so construction in nesting areas during nesting seasons can constitute a taking.
Wildlands requested comment on the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site from the USFWS in regards to
migratory birds on August 10, 2016. The USFWS response on October 20, 2016 did not include any
comments related to migratory birds. Correspondence with USFWS is included in the Appendix.
kAol Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion Summary Page 3

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
Appendix

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
1812 Mcintyre Road
Wingate, NC 28174
Inquiry Number: 4702626.2s
August 17, 2016
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
(rEDR" www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary
ES1
OverviewMap-----------------------------------------------------------
2
DetailMap--------------------------------------------------------------
3
Map Findings Summary
4
MapFindings------------------------------------------------------------
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - GR -1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map -------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map ------------------------------------------------
A-16
Physical Setting Source Map Findings
A-18
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC4702626.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
1812 MCINTYRE ROAD
WINGATE. NC 28174
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.0234560 - 35° 1'24.44"
80.4512050 - 80° 27'4.33"
Zone 17
550065.6
3875584.2
504 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5947250 WATSON, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140517
Source: USDA
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
1812 MCINTYRE ROAD
WINGATE, NC 28174
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
Reg UNION CO LDFL NC HSDS Same 3439, 0.651, NW
4702626.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL---------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY---------. Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS -ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------ RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls/ engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS--------. Engineering Controls Sites List
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST Regional UST Database
LAST_________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST _____ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST__________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST__________________________ AST Database
INDIAN LIST ------------------ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/ engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP ------------------ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY
Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI__________________________
Open Dump Inventory
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEBRIS REGION 9----------. Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2---------------------- CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS
Spills Incident Listing
IMD--------------------------
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR--------.
RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS------.
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION -----------
2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS------------------------.
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD
Records Of Decision
RMP
Risk Management Plans
RAATS-----------------------
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS--------------------------
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS------------------------
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER-------_
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS--------------------
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP---------------------
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS---------------------
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES
Mines Master Index File
FINDS
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO-------------------------.
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DOCKET HWC---------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
COAL ASH
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance__________
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC
Underground Injection Wells Listing
ECHO ------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto__ EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS: The Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites list contains locations of uncontrolled and
unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file contains sites on the national priority list as well as the state
priority list. The data source is the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
A review of the NC HSDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/09/2011 has revealed that there is 1
NC HSDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
UNION CO LDFL NW 1/2 - 1 (0.651 mi.) 0 8
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records.
Site Name
�3�DI �:3:L'1►N3:�:7�71�1��.9�I��
Database(s)
LAST
TC4702626.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 4702626.2S
//
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
0
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 112 1 Miles
LdIndian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
100 -year flood zone
500 -year flood zone
E] National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 1812 Mcintyre Road CONTACT: Ian Eckardt
Wingate NC 28174 INQUIRY #: 4702626.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.023456 / 80.451205 DATE: August 17, 2016 9:47 am
Copyright 0 2016 EDR, Inc. ® 2015 TomTom Rel. 2015.

�i-
10
^/
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
t
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
DETAIL MAP - 4702626.2S
12
0 1/9 1/4 1/2 Miles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
100 -year flood zone Disposal Sites
500 -year flood zone
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 1812 Mcintyre Road CONTACT: Ian Eckardt
Wingate NC 28174 INQUIRY #: 4702626.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.023456 / 80.451205 DATE: August 17, 2016 9:48 am
Copyright c) 2016 EDR, Inc. c> 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS -ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
1
NR
1
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC4702626.2s Page 4

Database
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
(Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
US CDL
TP
Local Land Records
0
LIENS 2
TP
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
INDIAN VCP 0.500
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
NR
HIST LF
0.500
S W RCY
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
NR 0
US HIST CDL
TP
US CDL
TP
Local Land Records
0
LIENS 2
TP
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
TP
SPILLS
TP
IMD
0.500
SPILLS 90
TP
SPILLS 80
TP
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
TC4702626.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC4702626.2s Page 6
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
EDR Hist Auto
0.125
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EDR Hist Cleaner
0.125
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TC4702626.2s Page 6

Database
RGA LF
RGA LUST
- Totals --
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
(Miles) Property
TP
TP
0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC4702626.2s Page 7
Total
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1
Plotted
NR
NR
NR NR NR
0
NR
NR
NR NR NR
0
0
0
0 1 0
1
TC4702626.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
HSDS UNION CO LDFL
Region
NW NC
1/2-1
3439 ft.
HSDS:
Site Type:
SuperfundID:
Lat/Long:
Total area in coverage units:
Total perimeter in coverage units:
X -value coordinate in feet:
Y -value coordinate in feet:
Sites designated as superfund cleanup sites
Length of feature in internal units:
Area of feature in internal units squared:
MAP FINDINGS
Federal
980 503 163
35 2 11.132637 80 27 51.326601
619170.1875
4221.60791015
1561706.125
471404.9375
771
4221.60789385
619170.176082
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
NC HSDS S102442875
N/A
TC4702626.2s Page 8

N
U
z
Q
K
m
w
>
J
O
O
O
M
LO
X
O
a
a
a
a
LU
LU
D
LL
0
U
z
Q
m
LU
J
O
_T
U

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
August 10, 2016
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the Deep Meadow
Mitigation Site. A USGS Topographic Map and an Overview Site Map with approximate project
areas are enclosed.
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. The Site contains Meadow Branch and three of its
unnamed tributaries, which flow to Richardson Creek. Several sections of channel have been
identified as significantly degraded. The project will include wetland restoration and the
restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the project streams. The site has historically
been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily row crop production.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the presence
of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning the project.
Sincerely,
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
rdavis(a)wildlandseng.com
Attachment:
USGS Topographic Map
Overview Site Map
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 � (P) 704-332-7754 - (F) 704-332-3306

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
August 29, 2016
Ruby Davis
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 106
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site, Union County, ER 16-1461
Dear Ms. Davis:
Thank you for your letter of August 10, 2016, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

3.2 Notices. All notices required by this agreement shalt be in writing, shalt be given only in accordance with
'he provisions of this Section, shall be addressed to the Parties in the manner stated below, and shall be conclusively
deemed properly delivered: (a) upon receipt when hand delivered during normal business hours; (b) upon the day of
delivery if the notice has been deposited in an authorized receptacle of the United States Postal Service as first-class,
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, with a return receipt requested; (c) one business day after the notice has
been deposited with either FedEx or United Parcel Service to be delivered by overnight delivery; or (d) if sent by email,
upon receipt of an acknowledgement email sent to the sender's email address in which the party receiving the email
notice acknowledges having received that email. An automatic "read receipt" is not acknowledgement for purposes of
this section 3.2. The addresses of the parties to receive notices are as follows:
TO BUYER: Wiidlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 5, Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Attention: Robert W. Bugg
e-mail: [e-mail]
TO SELLER: Baucom Farm and Milling
7410 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Attention: Kyle Herring
[e-mail]
Notice of change of address shalt be given by written notice in the manner described in this paragraph.
3.3 Assignment. Buyer has the right to assign this agreement without the consent of Seiler. No assignment
shall be effective unless the assignee has delivered to Seller a written assumption of Buyer's obligations under this
agreement. Seller hereby releases Buyer from any obligations under this agreement arising after the effective date of
any assignment of this agreement by Buyer.
3.4 Value of Conservation Easement; No Rower of Eminent Domain. in accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Buyer hereby notifies Seller that: (i) Buyer
believes that the fair market value of the Conservation Easement is an amount equal to the Purchase Price; and (ii)
Buyer does not have the power of eminent domain.
3.5 Modification; Waiver. No amendment of this agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and
signed by the parties. No waiver of satisfaction of a condition or failure to comply with an obligation under this
agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver, and no such waiver will
constitute a waiver of satisfaction of any other condition or failure to comply with any other obligation.
3.5 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other to interpret or enforce any of the
terms of this agreement or because of the breach by the other party of any of the terms of this agreement, the losing
party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, court costs, litigation costs and any other
expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or defense of such action, whether or not the action is prosecuted
to a final judgment,
a-as-ae cKc
Buyer M&
Seller eller

W 'PAW
WILDLANDS
ENGI NEER) NG
August zo, 2oi6
Marella Buncick
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
PO Box 33726i6o Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 288oi
Subject: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Buncick,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds or other trust resources associated
with the proposed Deep Meadow Mitigation Site. A USGS Topographic Map and an Overview
Site Map showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was
prepared from the Watson, 7.5 -Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangles.
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. The Site contains Meadow Branch and three of its
unnamed tributaries, which flow to Richardson Creek. Several sections of channel have been
identified as significantly degraded. The project will include wetland restoration and the
restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the project streams. The site has historically
been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily row crop production.
According to your website (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/union.htm1), the
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorate), the Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) and the
Schweinitz's sunflower (He(ianthus schweinitzii) are the federally -listed species in Union County.
If we have not heard from you in 3o days, we will assume that you do not have any comments
regarding associated laws and that you do not have any information relevant to this projects at
the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact
us with any questions that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
12�A. -3
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
Attachment:
USGS Topographic Map and Overview Site Map
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, INC 28203 ° (P) 704-332-7754 ° (F) 704-332-3306

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 20, 2016
Andrea S. Eckhardt
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Dear Ms. Eckhardt:
Subject: Deep Meadow Mitigation Project; Union County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-17-003
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated August 10, 2016 (received via email October 13, 2016). You requested
our comments on potential impacts to federal trust resources that may result from the proposed
project. The Service submits the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
Based on the preliminary information provided, you intend to restore, enhance, or preserve 4,287
linear feet of Meadow Branch and three of its unnamed tributaries on approximately 23 acres of
agricultural land (pasture/hay) near Wingate, North Carolina. Additionally, you propose to
restore/re-establish 9.4 acres of wetlands on the property. As currently proposed, the project
would generate 2,000 — 2,746 SMU's and 8.0 — 8.1 WMU's.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
On February 29, 2016, you conducted a pedestrian survey to assess the property for potential
suitable habitat for federally protected species known from Union County. At that time suitable
habitat was observed for the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower, (Helianthus
schweinitzii) along the site's forest margins and transitional zones. These areas of suitable
habitat were reassessed on August 10, 2016 and revealed no occurrences of the species. Based
on your assessments, you determined that the proposed project will have "no effect" on federally
protected species. Therefore, we consider the requirements under the Act to be complete and
require no further action at this time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act
must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may
affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.

In the interest of protecting fish, wildlife, and other natural resources we request that the
following measures be incorporated into project plans:
Stream Channel and Bank Reconstruction/Restoration Activities
1. All reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are
based on the bank -full, or channel -forming, stage of the stream. Natural channel
conditions should be identified using reference reaches (nearby stream reaches that
exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the pattern, dimension,
and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project's success.
2. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible.
3. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery
should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance. Equipment
should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior to project construction,
(b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no leaks of potential
contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during construction.
4. Deep -rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel
work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no greater
than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical
but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.
5. Reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas are stabilized with
seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting prior to the end of
each workday. No erosion -control matting or blankets should contain synthetic (netting)
materials. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever possible,
live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed establishment,
additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along slopes and
overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or other
geotextile material).
6. Cross-sections (at intervals based on restoration reach size), longitudinal profiles, and
stream -pattern plans should be measured and mapped prior to and immediately following
any channel work. In addition, photographs should be taken to document the condition of
the project site prior to initiating the work and upon completion of the work. However,
since a project's restoration success does not necessarily equate to biological success, the
ecological goals of the project should be clearly defined and assessed for improvement
after construction is completed.
Stream Buffers
Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100 -year floodplain, whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas. Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes,
roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission, etc.), and other infrastructures that require
2

maintained, cleared rights-of-way and/or compromise the functions and values of the forested
buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.
Invasive Exotic Species
Without active management, including the revegetation of disturbed areas with native species,
this project may become a corridor for the movement of invasive exotic plant species. Exotic
species are a major contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat loss.
Exotics are a factor contributing to the endangered or threatened status of more than 40 percent
of the animals and plants on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants.' It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic plant species and 2,300 exotic animal species
are now established in the United States, costing more than $130 billion a year to control .2
Additionally, the U.S. Government has many programs and laws in place to combat invasive
species (see www.invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of Executive Order
13112 - Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to "not authorize, fund, or
carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of
invasive species in the United States or elsewhere." Despite their short-term erosion -control
benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once they are
established, thereby preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotic
plants' are also aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing
already -established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species native
to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of this
project.
The Service supports the restoration objectives of this project. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-003.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
E.c. David Shaeffer, USACE
Ruby Davis, Wildlands Engineering
'D.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in
the United States. BioScience 48:607-615.
ZD. Pimentcl, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous
species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.
'Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http://www.tneppc.org/and http://Www.invasive.org/eastern/srs/
(exotic wildlife links) on the Internet.
3

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Date Of Land Evaluation Request 8/16/16
Name Of Project Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Federal Agency Involved FHWA - NCDMS
Proposed Land Use Stream & Wetland Restoration
County And State Union County, NC
PART II (To be completed by NRCS)
Date Request Received By NRCS 08/16/16 By Milton Cortes NRCS NC
Does the site contain prime, unique, statewide or local important farmland? Yes No
(If no, the FPPA does not apply -- do not complete additional parts of this form). © ❑
Acres Irrigated
none
Average Farm Size
190 acres
Major Crop(s)
CORN
Farmable Land In Govt. Jurisdiction
Acres: 384, 651 acres % 94%
Amount Of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
Acres: 291, 581 acres %77%
Name Of Land Evaluation System Used
Union Co., NC LESA
Name Of Local Site Assessment System
none
Date Land Evaluation Returned By NRCS
August 17, 2016 By email
PART III T b 1-f-4 b C-4- /A
Alternative Site Rating
(o a comp y e era gency) Site A Site B
Site C
Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 23.6
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly 0.0
C. Total Acres In Site 23.6 0.0
0.0
0.0
PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland 21.7
B. Total Acres Statewide And Local Important Farmland 1.3
C. Percentage Of Farmland In County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted 0.0079
D. Percentage Of Farmland In Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value 41.3
PART V (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion 88
Relative Value Of Farmland To Be Converted (Scale of 0 to 100 Points)
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Site Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(b)
Maximum
Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use
15 15
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use
10 10
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed
20 20
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government
20 20
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area
0 0
6. Distance To Urban Support Services
0 0
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average
10 0
8. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland
25 0
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
5 5
10. On -Farm Investments
20 10
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services
25 0
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
10 0
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS
160 80 0
0
0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V)
100 88
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or a local
site assessment)
160 80 0
0
0
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines)
260 168 0
0
0
Site Selected:
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Date Of Selection Yes El No 13
Reason For Selection:
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD -1006 (10-83)
This form was electronically produced by National Production Services Staff

From: Ian Eckardt
To: "Cortes. Milton - NRCS. Raleiah, NC'
Subject: RE: Request for AD1006 Form - Deep Meadow Mitigation Site - Union County, NC
Date: Friday, August 19, 2016 10:10:00 AM
Attachments: imaae001.ipa
NRCS AD1006 Deep Meadow Completed.pdf
Milton,
Thank you for the prompt response and assistance with the AD1006 form. Please find attached the
completed AD1006 form for the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site. Let me know if you need anything
else for your records.
Ian Eckardt I Environmental Scientist
0: 704.332.7754 x108 M: 704.517-4988
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
From: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 7:52 PM
To: Ian Eckardt <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for AD1006 Form - Deep Meadow Mitigation Site - Union County, NC
Importance: High
Good evening Mr. Eckardt;
Please find attached the letter of response and AD1006 for the NCDENR Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) stream restoration project (Deep Meadow Mitigation Site) located in Union County.
If I can be of further assistance please feel free to contact us.
Cordially,
A ilton Cbrtis
Assistant State Soil Scientist
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
4407 Bland Rd., Suite 117
Raleigh, NC
[phone]
milton.cortesia nc.usda.eov
(Helping people help the land id.
From: Ian Eckardt[mailto:ieckardt(@wildlandseng.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 5:11 PM
To: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC <Milton.CorteslcDnc.usda.gov>

USDA
Natural Resources August 17, 2016
Conservation Service
North Carolina
State Office
Mr. Ian Eckardt
Environmental Scientist
4407 Bland Road
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Suite 117
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27609
Voice 919-873-2171
Charlotte, NC 28203
Fax [phone]
Dear Mr Eckardt:
Thank you for your letter dated August 16, 2016, Subject: Request for
Comments — NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) stream
restoration project (Deep Meadow Mitigation Site) located in Union County. The
following guidance is provided for your information.
Projects are subject to the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) requirements
if they may irreversibly convert farmland (directly or indirectly) to non-
agricultural use and are completed by a federal agency or with assistance from a
federal agency. Farmland means prime or unique farmlands as defined in section
1540(c)(1) of the FPPA or farmland that is determined by the appropriate state or
unit of local government agency or agencies with concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture to be farmland of statewide local importance.
For the purpose of FPPA, farmland includes prime farmland, unique farmland,
and land of statewide or local importance. Farmland subject to FPPA
requirements does not have to be currently used for cropland. It can be
forestland, pastureland, cropland, or other land, but not water or urban built-up
land.
Farmland does not include land already in or committed to urban development
or water storage. Farmland already in urban development or water storage
includes all such land with a density of 30 structures per 40 -acre area. Farmland
already in urban development also includes lands identified as urbanized area
(UA) on the Census Bureau Map, or as urban area mapped with a tint overprint
on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographical maps, or as
urban -built-up on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Important Farmland Maps.
The area in question meets one or more of the above criteria for Farmland.
Farmland area will be affected or converted. Enclosed is the Farmland
Conversion Impact Rating form AD 1006 with PARTS II, IV and V completed by
NRCS. The corresponding agency will need to complete the evaluation,
according to the Code of Federal Regulation 7CFR 658, Farmland Protection
Policy Act.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service
is an agency of the Department of Agriculture's
Natural Resources mission.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Ian Eckardt
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact Milton Cortes, Assistant State Soil Scientist at
919-873-2171 or by email: milton.cortes&nc.usda.gov.
Again, thank you for inquiry. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
Milton Cortes
Assistant State Soil Scientist
cc:
Kent Clary, State Soil Scientist, NRCS, Raleigh, NC

WILDLANDS
E N G IN E E R1 N G
August 10, 2016
Shannon Deaton
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission
Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Subject: Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Union County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Deaton,
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to fish and wildlife issues associated with the proposed
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site. A USGS Topographic Map and an Overview Site Map
showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was
prepared from the Watson, 7.5 -Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangles.
The Deep Meadow Mitigation Site is being developed to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream channel impacts. The Site contains Meadow Branch and three of
its unnamed tributaries, which flow to Richardson Creek. Several sections of channel
have been identified as significantly degraded. The project will include wetland
restoration and the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the project streams.
The site has historically been disturbed due to agricultural use, primarily row crop
production.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to
contact us with any questions that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Ruby M. Davis
Environmental Scientist
Attachment:
USGS Topographic MapOverview Site Map
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203 - (P) 704-332-7754 � (F) 704-332-3306

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
October 14, 2016
Ms. Ruby Davis
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: Request for Environmental Information for the Deep Meadow Mitigation Site, Union County,
North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Davis,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
proposed project description. Comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions of the Clean
Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G. S. 113 -13 1 et seq.).
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. proposes to complete a stream restoration project to provide in-kind
mitigation for unavoidable stream channel impacts. The proposed project, referred to as the Deep
Meadow Mitigation Site, is comprised of Meadow Branch and three associated tributaries. The proposed
work will involve wetland restoration as well as stream restoration, enhancement and preservation. The
site has been historically disturbed as a result of agricultural use, specifically row crop production. The
project site is located west of McIntyre Road, south of its intersection with Olive Branch Road, northeast
of Monroe.
Stream restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing native, forested
buffers in riparian areas will help protect water quality, improve aquatic and terrestrial habitats and
provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. The NCWRC recommends the use of biodegradable and
wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products
should have loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the
vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing and similar products that have been reinforced with plastic or
metal mesh should be avoided as they impede the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt
and sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of spawning
habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging of gills. Any invasive plant species that are found onsite should
be removed.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
October 14, 2016
Scoping — Deep Meadow Mitigation
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or gabriela.garrisongncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
C�a •�.c.k1
Gabriela Garrison
Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
Figures

i
- Project Parcel
Municipalities
Figure 1
WILD LANDS Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING 0 2 MI@S
i i rd Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC
Fairview
-
�f'i�' �
•�
.;-
Pnr. MaunlO rt
�>r,ffi7`.
=
-}r}
W�Club
Unionville
-
9,
R�
y-r r
-
S '
t.
YY
Monroe
^••
-s
Yti
CS �
' �
__—___ sir ..
h'Y _•
Wingate"
Mars,,��iille��
i-�
i
- Project Parcel
Municipalities
Figure 1
WILD LANDS Vicinity Map
ENGINEERING 0 2 MI@S
i i rd Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

r J
S 50
_-j
II �•' rte~ 1�y � ��
r �N . JV
age [�rS f
Project Site
- Proposed Conservation Easement fr
atson, USL 7.5 mint td o ra hi rang e -
Figure 2
WILD LANDS Topographic Map
ENGINEERING I I I I 1,000 Feet Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

- Project Location Heelsplitter Critical Habitat
— — Hydrologic Unit Code (14) Project Downstream Waters
r -----
L _ Union County Boundary
d~v
501030 030
•„1jJerCJ4Ue'f,;5�71UUfiU U:i�y(1�1�(yL1CJ1U
!i
0%
'% 03040105060020
� v
10070 !' f
t
Ar W-0 _ 1.11.11 1101 j� t, 03040105050020 S
,*1 j
`1 j 03040105090010
1 ?030401050,
03050103020050 i 03040105050010
Duck Creek It "-� �, ` �%
103020040 r•if �.� j `�'�� NIL\
.r'�•�.^` / *;✓tel �; /�\` 00" `r -
03050103020060! 0390105030020 1 03040105040030
\ �•�._ i )03040105040020
1A JR
) / 'Iral Goose Creek �'►
/. J a.,
0305010300670 �! b ihr `_ ,�,i"'���� f `�•� 03040105070080
F 1JII-d-•17•: III@
&4105040010
i
1, 030�4�0,1/f05�08�L�50304010507 60
f50,fO3 10 1 03040105070050 Deep Meadow
Mitigation Site Ii
i
03040105070070 —
hopel
101013040105081040
��.I 03CIj1010507(�120
03050103030020
( 03040105070030
T Y
rt9 t ir=,lr.11l� i
1 ; 03040105070040 fr I \
P.lirieral 03040105081030 i
Springs
001
i! 03040105070010
�,✓ ^`' �� �L 03040105081020
Waxhaw Creek 1
1
0305010303 030 rr�I�
I
03040105081010 `\ +..���..r.. j 304010#061010
j 03050103040010 / 03040202010010 1 y
030402¢166001
Figure 3
W I L D L A N D S 0 2 4 Miles Heelsplitter Critical Habitat
F N G IN EE a I N G I I I I I Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

Figure 4
WILDLANDS Soils Map
ENGINEERING 0 500 Feet
I I I I I I Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

APPENDIX 6
PLAN SHEETS

m _
Wingate, NCr
µ'Y3
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Union County, North Carolina
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040105
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
Environmental
Quality
PRELIMINARY PLANS
ISSUED WITH DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN
FOR IRT REVIEW
JANUARY 23, 2018
Sheet Index
Title Sheet
General Notes and Symbols
Project Overview
Typical Sections
Stream Plan and Profile
Wetland Grading
Planting
Details
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
License No. F-0831
1430 South Mint Street, Ste 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aaron S. Earley, PE
704-332-7754
Surveying:
Turner Land Surveying
PO Box 148
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Elisabeth G. Turner, PLS
919-827-0745
0.1
0.2
0.3
1.1-1.2
2.1-2.11
3.1-3.2
4.1-4.4
5.1-5.8
Owner:
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Ste 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Harry Tsomides
828-545-7057
DMS Project No. 97131
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040105
a�
z..yoaoo
aWYZmmz
aWo��LL�
.31

STATI
WF1- PRE'
LAT: N35'
LON: W80'
STATI
WF1-ENHA
STA: 100+66
MEADOW BRANCH -ENHANCEMENT II
LAT: N35'01'14.19"
LON: W80° 27'04.55"
MEADOW
0' 100' 200' 300'
(HORIZONTAL)
Ag
06
Z�mI
d�2�— o
ZOO,
�2�nnw
Anis
►� Y'^ z r I E
G0�
0
.a

490
485
480
475
100+00
STA: 100+66
BEGIN MEADOW BRANCH - ENHANCEMENT II
100+00 �—
---------
100+50 101+00
i I 1 � Iia
-- _- d9 �J�/ ♦ -
101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00
------ - ---
MEAD W B __----------
-RRA�OC�H:�
\1, .i � ._ ;;�xo� vcrz� � 485 �R- Z''��•
101_-��
_ =—
_ _-- __ = ----
------------------
00
REMOVE BEAVER DAM
BANK GRADING LIMITS AND DEPOSITIONAL BARS
STA: 101+57
MEADOW BRANCH -ENHANCEMENT II
STA: 401+93
I END WF1- ENHANCEMENT I
CONFLUENCE
cF
\ fF \
cf \
cf \
CF \
--
103+50
490
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60'
Zv��mLL
(HORIZONTAL) d %°N 6
�YCnnv
aYouriE
r W� E
485 z
480
G
475
104+00 104+20
a-+
/ Representative
/ N 1 Typical Section 1 O
rl 1�
U
ZI Iz b
of to bp
< 1 I s , ;-4
/I Z EXISTING GRADE ; Z
-----� ----__ Y z
�! ml la
3 4-
3'1
Q
____-%- �� PROPOSED GRADE .4
----- ----
W NOTE: Q
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING LIMITS ARE SHOWN.
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS
Sheet Index
a
oo
oN
m
+
N
N
I I
+N
ry
O
V
I
O
n
+
O
V
N
^
n
+
O
N
O
p
O
F
of
w
w
W m
F
J
w
I
I
w
I
I
w
W
Ca
ry
N
F
V1
N
F
I \
+
a
O
a
J
II
vl
w
�
II
r
—
0:w.
i
.2%
i
EXISTING
GROUND
GRADE
PROPOSED
STA: 100+66
BEGIN MEADOW BRANCH - ENHANCEMENT II
100+00 �—
---------
100+50 101+00
i I 1 � Iia
-- _- d9 �J�/ ♦ -
101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00
------ - ---
MEAD W B __----------
-RRA�OC�H:�
\1, .i � ._ ;;�xo� vcrz� � 485 �R- Z''��•
101_-��
_ =—
_ _-- __ = ----
------------------
00
REMOVE BEAVER DAM
BANK GRADING LIMITS AND DEPOSITIONAL BARS
STA: 101+57
MEADOW BRANCH -ENHANCEMENT II
STA: 401+93
I END WF1- ENHANCEMENT I
CONFLUENCE
cF
\ fF \
cf \
cf \
CF \
--
103+50
490
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60'
Zv��mLL
(HORIZONTAL) d %°N 6
�YCnnv
aYouriE
r W� E
485 z
480
G
475
104+00 104+20
a-+
/ Representative
/ N 1 Typical Section 1 O
rl 1�
U
ZI Iz b
of to bp
< 1 I s , ;-4
/I Z EXISTING GRADE ; Z
-----� ----__ Y z
�! ml la
3 4-
3'1
Q
____-%- �� PROPOSED GRADE .4
----- ----
W NOTE: Q
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING LIMITS ARE SHOWN.
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS
Sheet Index

490
485
480
475
104+20
104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS
i
1
SET LOG SILL 0.2' HIGH TO
HOLD WATER IN WETLAND
107+00 107+50
108+00
i
490 0` 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) V g
0' 20' 40' 60' Qtl���o0
ZvN�mLL
(HORIZONTAL)6
+Zmmy
=.9
nnw
A v�
a Yo u ~'i E
W� LL
485 z
�
480 ,p�
475
108+50 108+65
1 Representative 1 Cn
1 Typical Section
STA: 108+00 -111+60 = 4 U
zl z Iz (t
al m to
<1 IW Is �
(D; `EXISTING GRADE m ; Z '� O
al _ -- / Im --- Im
— / I O 4-
1.0
PROPOSED GRADE 3.0' U
NOTE: •.--i
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
Sheet Index
NQ�,u
o
N
N
E
M
o s
s
JO
M
O^
m
Vl Vf
^
1p
N
p
o
! W
00^
V
ONO
fJ
�^.�
n
^
W
}
W
°
T
+00
^
000
O
o
00
w
o
a
II
<
>
u
W
o
~
a
w
w
Q
>
<
r
w
+
o
a
u
u
r
�
—
--1.0%
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS
i
1
SET LOG SILL 0.2' HIGH TO
HOLD WATER IN WETLAND
107+00 107+50
108+00
i
490 0` 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) V g
0' 20' 40' 60' Qtl���o0
ZvN�mLL
(HORIZONTAL)6
+Zmmy
=.9
nnw
A v�
a Yo u ~'i E
W� LL
485 z
�
480 ,p�
475
108+50 108+65
1 Representative 1 Cn
1 Typical Section
STA: 108+00 -111+60 = 4 U
zl z Iz (t
al m to
<1 IW Is �
(D; `EXISTING GRADE m ; Z '� O
al _ -- / Im --- Im
— / I O 4-
1.0
PROPOSED GRADE 3.0' U
NOTE: •.--i
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
Sheet Index
NQ�,u
o
N
N
E
M
o s
s

490
485
480
475
108+65 109+00 109+50
—--------------------------------------------
----------------
----- ------ _—
-------
------------------- ---
Ln
0 + ------
0 ---------------------
o------------
II
ZI
J.
110+00 110+50
2-----
,p$�-- TIONAL
EXCAVATE DEPOSI---'---
-)— I------ aeac
'----------
-------------
111+00 111+50 112+00
STA: 111+00 \
MEADOW BRANCH - ENHANCEMENT II f�
STA:214+01 9
END EF1- RESTORATION
CONFLUENCE
-
----------- QgS
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
ISHIVM1 VRHUIIVV Lllvlil,a-
-----485-----
112+50
490 0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �tl��anoO
Zvrvnm
(HORIZONTAL) d 6
°N%" d
z nm
=E Zoa
9 Anes11
a Yo u 1'2E
W~ LL
z
485
0��ti0�
5�
480 O;
475
113+00
Representative
~ Typical Section
STA: 108+00 -111+60
z� I=
s� z �Z
Y PROPOSED o
a 1 GRADE EXISTING GRADE u Z
LFIELD/
STA: 109+00 - 1260.3' BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPTO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEERIN
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FTTOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS GRADING PER PLANS
NOTE:
00 GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
C
00 DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
1
Sheet Index
� O
o U
Cy.,5� 4
v+.!
ri 4
z
O 4-
U
I --I
o
�
00
a
a
00
+
V
V
W pip
o v
H
In
w
Q
w
+
N
o�
O
pp
v
V~f
oo
Q
W
N
w
a Q
H
Vl
J
W
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
—--------------------------------------------
----------------
----- ------ _—
-------
------------------- ---
Ln
0 + ------
0 ---------------------
o------------
II
ZI
J.
110+00 110+50
2-----
,p$�-- TIONAL
EXCAVATE DEPOSI---'---
-)— I------ aeac
'----------
-------------
111+00 111+50 112+00
STA: 111+00 \
MEADOW BRANCH - ENHANCEMENT II f�
STA:214+01 9
END EF1- RESTORATION
CONFLUENCE
-
----------- QgS
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
ISHIVM1 VRHUIIVV Lllvlil,a-
-----485-----
112+50
490 0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �tl��anoO
Zvrvnm
(HORIZONTAL) d 6
°N%" d
z nm
=E Zoa
9 Anes11
a Yo u 1'2E
W~ LL
z
485
0��ti0�
5�
480 O;
475
113+00
Representative
~ Typical Section
STA: 108+00 -111+60
z� I=
s� z �Z
Y PROPOSED o
a 1 GRADE EXISTING GRADE u Z
LFIELD/
STA: 109+00 - 1260.3' BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPTO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEERIN
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FTTOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS GRADING PER PLANS
NOTE:
00 GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
C
00 DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
1
Sheet Index
� O
o U
Cy.,5� 4
v+.!
ri 4
z
O 4-
U
I --I

485
480
475
470
117+50
n (:5
10
m + m
w + + w v Nv+ 00
a 00iJo >
+i A z -0.2%
STA =117+69
ELEV = 480.20 EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GRADE
118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00
I
l
I►a
I
120+50 121+00 121+50
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS 1
485 0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �tl�oNNoO
Z«rvnm i
(HORIZONTAL) d °N �^� d
+Zmmy
�Y.nnw
Anes
a You ~'i E
W� LL
480 Z
0�
475
470
122+00
1 Typical Section 1
�1 Ir
gl 1�
�1 IJ
zl Iz
of to
<1 1s
ZEXISTING GRADE ; Z
f°1 -----�----- ---- Im
31 �I I 1
3'•
PROPOSED -__--__--
GRADE
STA: 109+00 - 126+11
1 0.3BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND_
GRADING PER PLANS
y-
I NOTE:
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
-------- _- { DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHO
WN.
�-;��♦- ____ °^.F�tin_°9�aw -'
-
♦- _�titiF'n.°aw C
--/
f
wwii
4_
80_=
- \
_
- 1_2
2 �
r0
_ ---
mf--- --_ ---------------0 _
" -480
-
--- ;
REMOVE DEBRIS V ---i-
- _ — 1♦ --�
rte► - --== ------ __=-c---c==-_----= DITCH STABILIZATION
----------------------- ; 0- �I SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET
-
BANK GRADING LIMITS 483 Lu
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS I Z
-------- - Z
f-
------------------485-------------- ,,
Sheet Index
Cn O
-4 i -i
o U
C5 4
z
O
4-
0
I --I 1 D
N
•+ C
�' U
N
E W
3
118+00 118+50 119+00 119+50 120+00
I
l
I►a
I
120+50 121+00 121+50
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS 1
485 0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �tl�oNNoO
Z«rvnm i
(HORIZONTAL) d °N �^� d
+Zmmy
�Y.nnw
Anes
a You ~'i E
W� LL
480 Z
0�
475
470
122+00
1 Typical Section 1
�1 Ir
gl 1�
�1 IJ
zl Iz
of to
<1 1s
ZEXISTING GRADE ; Z
f°1 -----�----- ---- Im
31 �I I 1
3'•
PROPOSED -__--__--
GRADE
STA: 109+00 - 126+11
1 0.3BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND_
GRADING PER PLANS
y-
I NOTE:
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
-------- _- { DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHO
WN.
�-;��♦- ____ °^.F�tin_°9�aw -'
-
♦- _�titiF'n.°aw C
--/
f
wwii
4_
80_=
- \
_
- 1_2
2 �
r0
_ ---
mf--- --_ ---------------0 _
" -480
-
--- ;
REMOVE DEBRIS V ---i-
- _ — 1♦ --�
rte► - --== ------ __=-c---c==-_----= DITCH STABILIZATION
----------------------- ; 0- �I SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET
-
BANK GRADING LIMITS 483 Lu
EXCAVATE DEPOSITIONAL BARS I Z
-------- - Z
f-
------------------485-------------- ,,
Sheet Index
Cn O
-4 i -i
o U
C5 4
z
O
4-
0
I --I 1 D
N
•+ C
�' U
N
E W
3

485
480
475
470
122+00
122+50 123+00
PER WETLAND GRADING
SEE SHEET 3.1
123+50 124+00
_
_
_
_
I♦ , - - " --------------
-----------
----------
---
---------
♦♦ � '"-----' _._rte-� ,- 2w , ,, 'a,�
3
i
♦ / -
♦ - - -- _; ->� -- -- 2.. , ` ` , ' ' _ -0
_
�a_
1221/ ♦♦ ♦,p O -
00 ♦ ♦ �,, \ _` '\ ?g0;"
.0.a
40 40 INSTALL BOULDER CLUSTER RIFFLE _ --___ �� is��� i ��ft
,OJ♦♦♦ SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 5.2 M DOW BRANCH
o I 483 BANK GRADING LIMITS
NI
14
rl _-
HI
N
/zlJ
U�
------------------------------------------------------------------
I
\
\
DITCH STABILIZATION \
SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 5.4-1,,,
124+50 125+00 125+50
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS
REMOVED FALLEN TREE
STA: 126+11
END MEADOW BRANCH -ENHANCEMENT II
0' 2' 4' 6'
485
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �06;��o0
Zv.,m 1
(HORIZONTAL) d °N" ^4 d
Zmmy
� z'f W
A02.....
a Z" 2 E
W� LL
Z
480
y� ti�QG��O�
475 GOT
470
126+00 126+20
1 Typical Section 1
�1 1�
�1 1�
�1 IJ
ZI Iz
of to
�1 1�
(D; EXISTING GRADE ; Z
Y
co I m
i
3.1 I I 1
3'
PROPOSED
GRADE
STA: 109+00 - 126+11
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FTTOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS
\\ \` 6+76
NOTE:
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
Sheet Index
ry O^l
+
N ^
N
M-
^ Iq
n
^
lD
N y
N
a
V
a
+
I�
F
I
Q
J
I
F
VI
N O
H
IA
W
VI
W
I
J
I
W
N�
F
N a
~
h W
VI
W
II
I I ,
In w
1.2
0.4%
V
v
v
GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
122+50 123+00
PER WETLAND GRADING
SEE SHEET 3.1
123+50 124+00
_
_
_
_
I♦ , - - " --------------
-----------
----------
---
---------
♦♦ � '"-----' _._rte-� ,- 2w , ,, 'a,�
3
i
♦ / -
♦ - - -- _; ->� -- -- 2.. , ` ` , ' ' _ -0
_
�a_
1221/ ♦♦ ♦,p O -
00 ♦ ♦ �,, \ _` '\ ?g0;"
.0.a
40 40 INSTALL BOULDER CLUSTER RIFFLE _ --___ �� is��� i ��ft
,OJ♦♦♦ SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 5.2 M DOW BRANCH
o I 483 BANK GRADING LIMITS
NI
14
rl _-
HI
N
/zlJ
U�
------------------------------------------------------------------
I
\
\
DITCH STABILIZATION \
SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 5.4-1,,,
124+50 125+00 125+50
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS
REMOVED FALLEN TREE
STA: 126+11
END MEADOW BRANCH -ENHANCEMENT II
0' 2' 4' 6'
485
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' �06;��o0
Zv.,m 1
(HORIZONTAL) d °N" ^4 d
Zmmy
� z'f W
A02.....
a Z" 2 E
W� LL
Z
480
y� ti�QG��O�
475 GOT
470
126+00 126+20
1 Typical Section 1
�1 1�
�1 1�
�1 IJ
ZI Iz
of to
�1 1�
(D; EXISTING GRADE ; Z
Y
co I m
i
3.1 I I 1
3'
PROPOSED
GRADE
STA: 109+00 - 126+11
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT WITHIN PROPOSED WETLAND AREAS
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FTTOP WIDTH.
TIE TO WETLAND
GRADING PER PLANS
\\ \` 6+76
NOTE:
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING IS SHOWN.
Sheet Index

505
500
495
N = 494
.
490
485199
+30
EXISTING IN
\
I
199+50 200+00 200+50
EXISTING 61 LF 60" CMP
INV. IN= 494.75
INV. OUT= 494.48
INSTALL PLUNGE POOL
WITH RIPRAP BANK PROTECTION -
i
/ EXISTING BEDROCK ----- - _ - i -
O � I
ti0 i CR -CR / G
\ �A EF1
�\
\ _------------------ Q
------------
IN
�'--------------
_`- I Z
--------------
_____________
____________________
CE �� CE CE CE AF
CE CE CE-- I Q- _
CE -� GC
CE -
CE
CE
- CE � �___-__- -
CE
LE -
201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00
_____________________________________ 3J x_33- 30 --------------------
31
____-____ _________
37 _3�___ 3]__- 3] -------------- 37 3J - �} -��i� ; ' __ _-
_; --
='
----------------
------
---------------
--- -
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
--- ----- -
v _
I +0
495 CR R
STA:200+38
BEGIN EF1- RESTORATION
a'
L CE
� CE
fE fE - CE � CE
499
505
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
500
j495
W
490
485
204+20
Typical Sections
10.2'
2.8'�f2.4'--r2.4'-r- 2.8'
1.1' 1.3'
EF1- Riffle
13.0'
EF1- Pool
STA: 210+00-214+01
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
Sheet Index
V)
g
7tl«�vaioo
��wur.iry d
Anis
E
0
r -I
F -I

495 -
490
485 -
H JII lr0 oJf
Vf
NF Ol
N
wW wW
VQHf trnp
Vl
VQF/nIIl
W Q+
II
NII lON0 F N>J _ry
II ry 11 w Q n __
W
O
0 0
p V V O
u N
0' 2' 4' 6'
u ° a s
N
o
Ol Vt
o +
N Vt V
°o° (VERTICAL)
Ol V
Q J II
v~i w II >—+
+ u II
>Q QW
'^ v °.-I° e -I m 0' 20' 40' 60'
+oo 495
mw
480204+20
204+50 205+00 205+50
' EXISTING FARM ROAD
y{'37% 37 _
Q
G
1
ti�oo ' L C\
R
�P 1
206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL -\ "
------- 'd ---------- —
- _
-----------
\ 37
_
- --
v 490
EF1 CaC� I\Ln
Ln
I00
O
-- (V
� Ln
---------------------------
- _ _
J
C=
LE -- IU
I � CE �
CE CE E
LE GE CE CE � CE ________ CE CE �
CE — CE — CE ___________ QCE G
1 `
CE �,
— CE � CE
- 490
- 485
480
208+50 208+65
(HORIZONTAL)
N
Typical Sections
10.2'
2.8'=2.4'2.4'- - 2.8'
EF1- Riffle
13.0'
-5.5' 1.8.-T 1 -i -?-1-4.6'
20' 1.4' 1.3'
EF1- Pool
STA: 210+00-214+01
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
Sheet Index
z'—
Nnmi1
dY% 46
Zmmy
�=.znnw
►� Y'^ z r �i E
G0�
rl ry
(J) O
r -I i -I
O C5
+, U
C5 4
b�40 a-1
z
O 4-
U
�I
W
O
O
06
M M
N
> 11
>
00
w
O
V
-
.+
00
10
00 O
10
+ww
Ot
^
ON
IINQ
0
0 V00
+
O+
00
0O0
00
10
OW
w
+
>
F
'
I I >
O
>
+
a0+Do
n
00+
o a
D
a
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
EXISTING
GROUND
w
w
n
w
w
F J
VI W
F
Vf
w
W
-
F
Vf
J -r
W Vf
J
W
1.3%
STA =205+05
ELEV = 489.92
STA =205+76
ELEV = 489.41
-1.2%
\
STA =205+19
ELEV = 489.00
STA =207+20
ELEV = 488.00
STA =205+90
ELEV
STA =205+33
=
489.00
ELEV = 488.40
STA =2 7+28
PROPOSED GRADE
STA
ELEV
=208+14
= 487.00
ELEV = 488.00
STA =208+23
ELEV
= 487.00
480204+20
204+50 205+00 205+50
' EXISTING FARM ROAD
y{'37% 37 _
Q
G
1
ti�oo ' L C\
R
�P 1
206+00 206+50 207+00 207+50 208+00
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL -\ "
------- 'd ---------- —
- _
-----------
\ 37
_
- --
v 490
EF1 CaC� I\Ln
Ln
I00
O
-- (V
� Ln
---------------------------
- _ _
J
C=
LE -- IU
I � CE �
CE CE E
LE GE CE CE � CE ________ CE CE �
CE — CE — CE ___________ QCE G
1 `
CE �,
— CE � CE
- 490
- 485
480
208+50 208+65
(HORIZONTAL)
N
Typical Sections
10.2'
2.8'=2.4'2.4'- - 2.8'
EF1- Riffle
13.0'
-5.5' 1.8.-T 1 -i -?-1-4.6'
20' 1.4' 1.3'
EF1- Pool
STA: 210+00-214+01
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
Sheet Index
z'—
Nnmi1
dY% 46
Zmmy
�=.znnw
►� Y'^ z r �i E
G0�
rl ry
(J) O
r -I i -I
O C5
+, U
C5 4
b�40 a-1
z
O 4-
U
�I

495
490
485
480
208+65
(VERTICAL)
0' 20' 40' 60'
(HORIZONTAL)
495
209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50
490 N
485
V)
g
tl°=�Noo
�I 2«Nn 4
ry d
z,^'.Im v
�ZEZ"
Anis
ND EF1 - RESTORATION
1
STA: 111+00
► 1
480
+�a)+
�y
N
213+00
213+50 214+00
(f)
11 m
1
O
1
�I
Typical Sections
U
10.2'
2.8'= 2.4' 2.4'2.8'
b
1.3'
a
C)
a
1.2'
38' 2_ 4.6'
O
U
2
1.4' 1.3'
n
EF1-Pool
STA: 210+00 - 214+01
I --I
1
1
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
y,
I� j I
o 4� BERM SHALL
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
lm
►D �,; l
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
m
i
oo
M
m
^
ao
m
'+
m
Sheet Index
♦
♦'I
I
►
1
1
1
/ 1
4WF29.
�
CWu
O
2.
00
+
M
ip�H
+
o
pp^
MtW\
1O6
M~rU1
MW
+
WrN
m�aw
ii•I
+ M+
M
M
co
v
Ow
>
-aFO--
-
O
NQH
O
ONF
l
N>
O
+
VII
V
V
.l
F
66
O
J
VI
J
WWII
wWII
NF
Q 1
y trI— II
0FQ J
aoo+I
j wUIIj
OO
oo
MNN
IaIiI +
W+II
oo
ON ON
I�
a?
NN
Vf W
N
r
N
,
H>
II
w
Q
w
N N
II
ry
a
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
'^ "'
Q
w
w
N II Q
wii
WV~f
N
m
S",
'o
N
a
40" RCP (2)
Q
v~ w
v�
w
N
Q
_ _
II
W
w
W
N
II
O
+
W
C\
m
O
Q
m
N
v
0'°
EXISTING
GROUND
STA=209+35
-21%
---
ELEV = 486.69
INV. EL: 486.29
STA =210+57
ELEV = 486.00
3.2%
_
_
–
STA =209+41
ELEV = 486.69
STA =210+67
STA
= 210+89
STA =211+46
2.8�
INV. EL: 486.62
ELEV = 486.00
ELEV
= 485.20
ELEV -
485.00
STA =212+56
- 483.30
1.8%
STA =210+78
STA =212+02ELEV
ELEV = 486.55
ELEV =
484.20
STA
=210+38_j
PROPOSED GRADE
STA =213+24
ELEV
= 486.29
ELEV =
481.80
209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50
490 N
485
V)
g
tl°=�Noo
�I 2«Nn 4
ry d
z,^'.Im v
�ZEZ"
Anis
STA: 214+01
ND EF1 - RESTORATION
1
STA: 111+00
► 1
480
+�a)+
�y
N
213+00
213+50 214+00
(f)
11 m
1
O
1
�I
Typical Sections
U
10.2'
2.8'= 2.4' 2.4'2.8'
b
1.3'
EF1- Riffle
C)
1.2'
38' 2_ 4.6'
O
U
2
1.4' 1.3'
n
EF1-Pool
STA: 210+00 - 214+01
I --I
1
1
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
y,
I� j I
o 4� BERM SHALL
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FT TOP WIDTH.
lm
►D �,; l
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
►
Sheet Index
♦
♦'I
I
►
1
1
1
/ 1
4WF29.
�
2.
STA: 214+01
ND EF1 - RESTORATION
1
STA: 111+00
► 1
►
NCH-ENHANCEMENTII
►
N
CONFLUENCE
► \
11 m
1
►; 1
1
�I
NQ�,u
�o
N
E
W
a O
u

0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) V)495 495 g
0' 20' 40' 60' 06;—.9
Zv.,m 1
(HORIZONTAL) d ° % `.4 d
+ZmMy
4
AnN 9 es
a Yo u r'i E
W� LL
490 490-141
485 485
480 480
400+00 400+50 401+00 401+50 401+93 �-
Cn o
O 05
4 U w
o
Representative c5
1 Typical Section 1 4 F-
�1 1�
:J 1 �
1 IJ
01
<1 ;< o F-
Z' EXISTING GRADE 1 z
m r
PROPOSED GRADE
NOTE:
GRADE STREAM BANKS WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW.
IIS
m I _k ill DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANKS WHERE NO GRADING LIMITS ARE SHOWN.
Sheet Index
-- BANK GRADING LIMITS
2.6
m
a bOO = " �' -- - --
I+g
Q 2.5 0
-
--------���� STATION 401+93 "I 1 00 2.11
ENDWFI-ENHANCEMENTI
0.5 �- - ---- _
WF2 x
_ 1 CCSTATION 400I N END WF1-PRESERVATION 1--------
-------
I'I G 2.8
1 2.9
STATION 400+77 1
„ BEGIN WFl -PRESERVATION m � I � 1
\ --
---- BEGINWFI- ENHANCEMENTI II'II 1 EF1
° ---------
q 2
---------------
2.10 �I � 2 G o
- 2.10 ^ '
---- - 1 ��I� o �I'�I 2.1 ` V
a WF1�2
3 x
O �
O1
M
O pip eM.l Opl
I� p p � + VI ^ ul
n
+ V1 II II O V } uj p p
N
7 a vri w Q> N 1p0 V� p N W
r+ -
>
QJ
o�p
pa
+
�
o�p
II
� Q
J
W
J
II � Vrt
w F
W
IA W
F J
VI W
VI
I
EXISTING
GROUND
-� -
PROPOSED
GRADE
STA
=401+06
\
ELEV
= 484.79
\
STA = 400+96
ELEV = 485.66

490
485
480
475
301+00 301+50 302+00
-----
INSTALL FORD CROSSING
---------
STA: 301+29
BEGIN WF2 - RESTORATION
302+50 303+00
WF2
I
i
00 \
\
` � I
I
i
I
I
FILL EXISTING
--,, CHANNEL (TYPJ
;-
303+50 304+00 304+50
\
\
�I
STA:305+87
END WF2 -RESTORATION p
STA: 118+05 'I
MEADOW BRANCH - ENHANCEMENT II
CONFLUENCE
I
i
Toxo 484 � ,
a
305+00
0' 2' 4' 6'
(VERTICAL) g
0' 20' 40' 60' dN 0 0
ZvN�m 1
490 (HORIZONTAL) z
+Zmmy
N �=c�nnw
Anis
a Yo u r'i E
W� LL
485
480
475
305+50 305+87
Typical Section
9.0'
2.5' t 2.0'tI 2.0' 2.5'
WF2 - Riffle
11.0'
6.0' 1.2'-}-1.7' � 2.2'
I - 1T
STA: 302+00 - 305+00 WF2 - Pool
0.3' BERM TO BE BUILT ON DOWNSTREAM
THIRD OF MEANDER BENDS.
BERM SHALL HAVE 2.5:1 SIDE SLOPES WITH 3FTTOP WIDTH.
TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD
Sheet Index
rl ry
(J) O
r i-,
O CI5
U
b
z
U
I --I I D
O
w �
M
� o
J
c
N
E
3
x

I
101
ce
ce
: ----- -- -----
-------------- ----
---- ----------------___
-- -------- J
---- ---------------------------- ----------- --------
-------- --- - — --- ------
---- --- ----- -----------
---------------
- - - - - --------- --------------------
--- --------- ------- - -------- ----------
-------- --- ----------------------------
- - - - ------------------
-------------
-z ------------------- ------ ------- - - - --------------- -
---- --------------
----------
------------ ------------------------------------- ------
0
30
----------
37
-----------
--MEADOW BRAN
-----------------
PROPOSED WETLAND
REHABILITATION (TYP.)
PROPOSED WETLAND
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
..---__------------------LE_------------- -11-
77� ------
----- 490� ------- t I I
------------------------
------- ---- ------- -------- -------- --- -
-----------
----- ---- ------ --- - — — ------- ---
--- ---- --- ----------------
ce
00- CE
------------------------------ -
- ----------------------------
--------- ---
-- ------
---- -- GROUND WATER
--.
""A GAUGE (TYP.)
REPRESENTATIVE
TYPICAL SECTION A -A'
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED WETLAND GRADING
GRO
GAU(
------------ PROPOSED WETLAND
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
------------------------------------------ ------
la
50, 100, 150,
(HORIZONTAL)
IF

0- A
---- --
- PROPOSEDWETLAND,/ /,
- RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
Spy GROUND WATER
GAUGE (TYP.)
_
W -E7
------ -- - - - -
/
-?11+00 ---- --------3+0p- r—r ,
-------485 ''.
3�
`I
00 1\\
I \
05 ---------------------------------------
---_
- 5 - PROPOSED WETLAND _ _-___
_ - RE-ESTABLISHMENT TYP. ---
` - - --- - -----------
PROPOSED WETLAND \ ( ) — 37 - a9
----- p REHABILITATION (TYP.) : -
--- ----
PROPOSED WETLAND = R95 i= --- -
-- ----------. RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.) — - _ 37- ,--- ----------
------------
------' -
�. _____33__ __ - r - �~
- -----
1
W -E8 -
GROUND WATER
GAUGE (TYP.)
---------------
W-E3 GROUND WATER -
W -E4
-------_ GAUGE (TYP.) -
_
___
CE — CE — CE CE — CE — CE CE C CE _
-----------------------------------
-__—__—__________-\
= " PROPOSED WETLAND
-------- RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
-------------
------------
------------
--------------
\_,
'_/ GROUND WATER _ _ -�`` ------ - ----------
'
�GAUGE(TYPJ
. __
_ ------"
----------------- - \- ;
485 -
- _
,'I
i
,-
W -E9
c
GROUND WATER1
GAUGE (TYP.)
484
44 -
y>_ _--
______________
W -ES
CE
CE
PROPOSED WETLAND
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.) --
--- _ -
Ncp_,- - - - ------ 495-------------
----
486 '- = '--------------------- ---
---------------
--------------------
CE
-
487
---
�l- - - -
\ _ --_-- --------- _-- __ __ ---- _-
/ %� _ - - _ - -- ----_ _ -- ---- - - - --
CE ,
_ _ ,
500
' _ __ - _ _
- -" PROPOSED WETLAND - _
- --------- -
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
--
---
_ --' --- '
95 --- -
REPRESENTATIVE
TYPICAL SECTION B -B'
NOT TO SCALE
----- —
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED WETLAND GRADING
IN
W -E10
GROUND WATER
GAUGE (TYP.)
i
GROUND WATER -
GAUGE (TYP.)
W -E6
Y! E
CE'
PROPOSED WETLAND_ CE � CE i\
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
CE
PROPOSED WETLAND
RE-ESTABLISHMENT (TYP.)
is
�='
0' 50' 100' 150'
(HORIZONTAL)
Z
i 6 NnM
Q�etvUni no
►�Y'^zr2E
co ✓✓
to
IF

00+ —
1?0
O
OO
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++++++ ++++++++++++++++++
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ...........................................
.................................................
......................................................
...........................................................
. ..........................................................
...... ..............................................
..... ............................................. .....
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++ + + + +++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ . . .
...... ..........................................
+++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++
0 ..................
++ + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
. . . . . . ...
.................................
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ................................. .........
+++++++++++
+++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
....... .. ...........
....... ............
+++++++++++++++ + ��++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++ + +
........ ..... ...............
................ ..... ..............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........ .......+ . . . .
.+++
.++
,
......+
D+IN +++�
juj+uu +*
--.+...+..
02
10,1 + + + ++++++++++++++++ + + + + + +
�P! A 41,00 . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . ++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + +++++
. . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++++++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++++++++++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++"
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++ + + + z/ 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . ... zizzzzzzzzzzi
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + +
+
+ z+
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+
+ ++++ +
++++
+ +
I I I I x x
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + z x z z z x z
. . . . . . ....
+ + + + + + +++
+ ++ + /+/
+ +
+ +
Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement
__ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzizizi
+ ++ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzizzz
++
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
. . . . ...*zzzzi. ... . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. .. .. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
+ +
+ +
. . . . . . . . . . .
+ + +' . . . . . . . . . . . . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++ + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++ +/V
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0!
.110+00, + + +++++++++++++ + + + + + + + +++++++++++ + + + + ++ +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . F
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ + + ++++++++++++++ M . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++++++++++ + + + EA6 ... 13+AA++ + + +++++++++++++++
.......................
+ PW .......
.......................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . %+++++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. + 214+0 + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++ + + + + +
+ L .. . . . . . .
+++++++++++++++++,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++ + + + + + 'o �izzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz�z
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -4N+i i i i i i x i x i x i x i x x x x x x i x i i i i i i i i x z x i x
ii i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++
+ + +
+ + +,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . I .
++++++++++++++ + + + + + + L + +
+ + +
zzzzzzzzzzzzz
+ +
...... . . . .N . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ +
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + + + +++
+ +
. . . . . . . .. . +
`%Y+ + + +
++ +
. . . . . ... . ++++++++
+ +
+
. . . .. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + 4
+ +
+ +
1. 80, 120'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
(J)
0
0 C5
U
C5 4
bp
,D
i

.... .......
+ +
ilii+
+
"""+ + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ++ + + .......
:+ +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
+ ................
. . . . . . . . . . + .................
+
+ +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... +,+++++ +
++++++++ + + +++++ + + + + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . +
L60 + + .. . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . +++++++++++++++++/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... +++ ++++
. . . . . . . . . .
........................ +++
......................... ................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ztJizzzzzzzzzzzzzz. . . . . . . .
+
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ +++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....
+ + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + cy . . . . . . . . . .
+
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . ... :+:+:++ +
+ + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . + +
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++ + + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++ + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..........
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + +++z
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... +++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + ++++++++++
zzzzzz
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . + + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + +
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzOzzzzzz zzzzzzz zzzzzzzz.z zzzzzzz''zzzzzz',.zzzzv'izz,zzizzzzz,zz.zzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz' zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz �zzzzzzzzz� zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzz,72zzzzzzzzzz3 'zzzzzzzz
zzz''zzzz, zzzzzzz'',, z'zzzzzz, zzzz'zzzzz, zzzzzz'zizzzzzzzzzzz', zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzz,z
zzzzzzzzzz,
zzzzzzzzzz,z
zzzzzzzzzzz,
zzzzzzzzzz,z
zzzzzzzzzz,z
zzzzzzzzzz,z
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + ++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + . . . . . . .
. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+
..�.�..ssa:::::: sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssss sssss,+ ssss+s,+++++++++++O+O+
++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++ � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. + + —+ —+ +AA . .. . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + -+---+-- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . ++'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '11870, PAN
.. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .+X* --,I— jig, ..... . . . . . . + poop—
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +:+:+:++
+++++++++ + + + + ++ + +
zzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,zzzzzzzzzzzz,z''''zzzzzzz,z
++++++
--moi zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
++++ a�ssssssssss+ + + + + + + + + ++++++++ 1224
. . . . . . . . . . . 77� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
++++++ + + + + + . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + . . ... . . ... . . . .. + + . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+++++++++ + + + +
++++++++++++ + + + sssssssssssssssssssssssss+++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++
I ++++++++++++ + + ++
++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .Op zzzz
+++++++++++++++ + : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + ++++,+
.. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ++++++++++ + +
. . . . . . . +++++++++
. . . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
%+ + + + + + + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + ++
+ + + + +
+ + + + + + +
o
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
... . . . . . . . . . +
+ + + + + ++++++++++ ++++++++
. . . . . . . . . . \ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . .
X +++++++ + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++ . . . . . . . . . n ++++++++++++++++++++++ , , , , , , , n s.
+++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ssssssssssss�ssssssssss . . . . . . . . ++++++++++++++++++++++ ssssssssssss
+ +
. . ...... . . . . . . .
7 + + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
+ ++++++++++++++++++
sss+ + + +
ssssssssssss
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ssssss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ssssssssssss
sss . . . . . . . . . ++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++ + +
. . . . . . . . . +++++++ + + + + ssss s s s ssss s s
. . . . . . .ssssssssssss
. . . . . . . . . . \ + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++sssssssssss
ss s . . . . . . . . . . . n + + + + + + + + + + . .. . . . . . ......
+ +
+ +
+ +
. . . . ssssssssass
ss . ....
.
+ +
Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement as 80, 120'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
-126,16
a)
U) -5
�I.
0 UC15
C5 4
bp
-4

--------------------
................
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + ++++++
+ + + + + + +++++++
N%++
+ ++
+++, �V+
+
azzz
+
++
+ AM11+
zzz'+ + + +
+ ,zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ + + LLj+
++++++++ ++ +
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz+
+ + ++++++++ +
+++++++
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
++++' +
+++ + ++
++++++++' +
... . . . . . . . .. +
+ + ...
+ +
+4 ++
+ 4 + + + + +
+
+ + + + + + + +++//+
+ X7 :+++ + + +
+ + . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . +
X -
+ . . . .
+ + +,, I +++++++++++++++++ ++++++ + + + + + ++ + + + +
V..... . . . . . . . . N'++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
++ + + + + + +++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++ ++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + +
. . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I +++++++++++ + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ ++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + +++211+00++++++
+ + + + + + +
+++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++?III OC)++++ + ++++++
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +++++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 0+00�
......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : �
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++
+ + +:+:+:+: + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++
+ . . . . . .
+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CE CE — CE CE CE
............
...............
.................
....................
-- - - - - - 1�
......................
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..........................
... ...................
...............................
................................
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
.................
..........
++ +++++ + + + +
+ + + + + + p7e*�*� +
+ . . .
+ + ++ + + + 0"
+ +
+ + . ... . . N + + +
0
. . .
209x90+
09,90, + +
zn_ + + + �- + + + + + +
+ + + N,
+ + + + +++++++++++++++
. . . . . ..... :,�.+++++++++-,0+ ++
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
........................
.....................
..........................
.........................
..............................
. ...........................
++++++7++++-+ + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++++
Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement
1. 80, 120'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
i
+ + +
+
+
x x ++++
+ + + + + + + + +
. . . .
. . . . . . . ....................
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +
Note:
Permanent Riparian seeding in
all disturbed areas within
Conservation Easement
1. 80, 120'
(HORIZONTAL)
Sheet Index
i

g
Z �Noo
I
9V�
+Zmmy
=�nnw
►� Y'^ z r i E
To
.�
N
w
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
3" TO 6" DIAMETER WOODY
I� B'
DEBRIS WORKED INTO RIFFLE
I
SUBSTRATE
MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS
HEAD OF RIFFLE
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
RIFFLE BOTTOM
A
A'
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
L
FLOW
SEE PROFILE
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
Section A -A'
POINT PER PROFILE
.i
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
B
Plan View
A
q'
B
RIFFLE
16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
RIFFLE BOTTOM FLOW
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
FLOW 16"
THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
I
o
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP) 3" TO 6" BRUSHY MATERIAL
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK WORKED INTO ROCKY SUBSTRATE
OP OF BANK TYP
/
TOE OF SLOPE /
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
B'
MICRO POOL HABITAT
Profile A -A'
Section
B -B'
BEHIND LARGER
WOODY DEBRIS
Plan View
16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
Section B -B'
Constructed
Riffle
511 Not to Scale
Woody Riffle LOG EXPOSED 1" TO 3" ABOVE
z FINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATION
CR -CR
CR -WR
5.1 Not to Scale
LENGTH VARIES PER PLAN
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
ONSITE BOULDERS
POINT PER PROFILE
3
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
o CR -JZ
CR -CH
LL (
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
B
BURY INTO BANK 5' MIN. (TYP)
'G
BANKFULL
16" THICKNESS
CLASS A/B MIX STONE
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
FLOW
TAIL OF RIFFLE
~�
HEAD OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION DINT
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
PER PROFILE
A
A'
Z O
S
m
0 o
B
Profile View
d w
A -A'
F
L g'
BURY INTO BANK V MIN. (TYP)
CLASS 1 STONE Plan View
LOG STRUCTURE
16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
OR SALVAGED
EXPOSED UNTIL
ONSITE BOULDERS
CENTER OF CHANNEL
MIN 0.5'xl'xl.5' 16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
TOP OF BANK
fi
g
CLASS 1 STONE
TOE OF SLOPE
ROCK VANES MAY
OR SALVAGED
BE USED IN PLACE
��
3" MAX
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'xl'RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
OF LOGS AT
x1.5'
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION
� // // // // / /j i:��.��/��
3" MAX
Log Section
B=B'
Section A -A'
\
NOTES•
• STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN
Section B -B'
SIZE AND TYPE WITHIN EACH
!04
RIFFLE.
TAIL RIFFLE ELEVATION
NOTES:
• USE LOGS A MINIMUM OF 15" IN
Plan View POINTT PER PROFILE
DIAMETER
• ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR
• IF ONSITE LARGE STONE IS NOT
LOGS AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
AVAILABLE FOR BOULDERS
/—,--,Chunky Riffle
n Jazz Riffle Structure
RIFFLE SHOULD BE CHANGED
5.1 Not to Scale
5.1
To JAZZ RIFFLE OR OTHER PER
Not to Scale
ENGINEER'S DIRECTION.
g
Z �Noo
I
9V�
+Zmmy
=�nnw
►� Y'^ z r i E
To
.�
N
w

BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)
THALWEG
FLOW TOP OF BANK 16" THICKNESS CLASS A/B MIX STONE
0.5' MAX. NORMAL WATER
SURFACE
5' MIN.
(NP) NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
Profile View
A -A'
NOTES:
1. BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE SUBSTITUTED
IN PLACE OF ANGLED LOGS WITH
APPROVAL OF ENGINEER.
Plan View
i

CLASS A/B STONE SILL ELEVATION PER
FLOW PROFILE
ADD BRUSH OR TRANSPLANTS 10" -15" DIAMETER LOG I�
a d HEADER LOG 0° - 15° ANGLE TO LARGER STREAMS I-� POOL LENGTH PER PROFILE
NONWOVEN STREAMBED PER PLANS OR (MEADOW BRANCH) AS ST BACKFILL
Y FILTER FABRIC FOOTER LOG FIELD DIRECTION DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
a ao o A \' POOL DEPTH PER PROFILE
p Y SILL ELEVATION
F- o PER PROFILE (TYP) NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC OR C12SBN
B MATTING AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
Ei EXTEND FILTER FABRIC 1
5' MIN. UPSTREAM FLOW EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
�POOL� S' MIN. UPSTREAM
Section A -A' \ / Profile View
INVERT ELEVATION BACKFILL TOE OF SLOPE TYP
PER PROFILE
X A TOP OF BANK
n FLOW TOP OF BANK (TYP)
H S
CHANNEL
A BOTTOM WIDTH
I I STABILIZE VANE SLOPE HEADER LOG Plan View
WITH ONE BOULDER
5' SCOUR ON EACH SIDE FOOTER LOG
POOL
Profile B - B' ! T�i PERPOR
/ � FIELD DIRECTION
B'
EMBED LOG SILL ELEVATION 12" -15" DIAMETER LOG
EXCAVATE POOL 4' (MIN.) PER PROFILE (TYP)
PER PROFILE
Section A - A'
Plan View STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS
X (FT) 22.5
NOTES: 1 Log,Vane Y(FT) 4.5 NOTES: 53 Longo Sall
5.3 Not to Scale H (FT) 1.3
• ON SMALLER STREAMS THE STABILIZATION S(%) 5.6 FOOTER LOG TO BE ADDED IF DROP IS
BOULDER MAY BE REMOVED PER6 (o) 25 MORE THAN HEADER LOG DIAMETER.
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
OCC✓CD � � \
SILL
PER PROFILE
Plan View
5'
Profile A -A'
12" NOMINAL THICKNESS
OF EQUAL PARTS
CLASS A, B, STONE
TOP OF BANK SILL ELEVATION PER PROFILE
EMBED 5'
INTO
BANK (TYP)
3 Rock Sill
5.3 Not to Scale
CLASS 2 STONE OR SMALL BOULDERS
MIN. 0.5'x 1.0'x 1.5'
`FILTER FABRIC
EXTEND FILTER
FABRIC 5' MIN.
UPSTREAM
NOTES:
• FORD CROSSING SHALL BE
INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO
CHANNEL BANKS.
9y\ Ila/
� \
MAINTAIN LOW FLOW THALWEG
Dl-- AT;-- THROUGH CROSSING
U7
Ag
06
ry d 6
Z���m
Q�acwur.i
�=�nnw
Anis
►� Y'^ z r �i E
60�
ate+
0
Z, UZ,
C5
Z
a� 0
U
0
Q U
To
N
W
TER FABRIC
Section View a °
�g
u J
4 Permanent Ford Crossin v m .
5.3 Not to Scale e W m
a 3 w

INVERT ELEVATION
TOP OF BANK (TYP) PER PROFILE HEADER ROCK V)
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS g "
WITH 1' TO 2' CLEAR SPACE OFFSET HEADER Z
d�Xvaoo
BETWEEN ROCKS TOE OF SLOPE TYP 0.25' TO 0.5' 2 ''i"' 6
d
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER d` � `z m m w
2' z
r r a==Z00v
EXCAVATE POOL TOE OF SLOPE
B PER PROFILE NONWOVEN BOTTOM WIDTH VARIES
/ _/
FILTER FABRICINSTALL 16" CLASS BSTONE �j Z,2FLLE
����� _Y CHANNEL BED
FLOW SCOUR
N
� POOL
z _ B' CLASS A/B FOOTER ROCK ?IM9k J;N
STONE
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM GRADE BANKS BACK AT 2:1 MAX
VANE ARM B
LENGTH
(Y)
Plan View STRUCTUREINVERT
/ELEVATION PER PROFILE.
HEADER ROCK
H TOE OF SLOPE SLOP
y T;
FOOTER ROCK
Profile View B -B'
1 Rock Vane
5.4 Not to Scale
50/50 MIX CLASS A AND CLASS B RIP
RAP PER GRADES SHOWN ON PLANS.
10' OVERFLOW VARIES ROAD CREST 20' VARIES 10' OVERFLOW
CHANNEL CHANNEL
CREST EL. 491.10 INITIAL BACKFILL,
PLACED IN LIFTS OF
TOP 3" ABC 12" MIN. TYPE 2 WOVEN/ To
TO 6
STONE COVER FILTER FABRIC CLASS 1;=0AL
PROPOSED 10 TYPE 2 WOVEN
GRADE 1 � 1 FILTER FABRIC I
\\\kii\\ \ i✓\\!'v \:- i0:\ i\\. �; >�\��\
\ � ,. \ \\�\i✓ii0. !\ \\.,!-�\ \\.\. \ \\.Y
��.�\i��� \\.\. - i\\^i \� i\�� �.\ �. !p. ^---_.-... : iii\C<\
iiO. i-i\\.\\i \ \\.\. pv\\ ii\\.\\!G\`\\ \ \-\`1\!\!\�\�.\ ___ !\\\C.�C!1 \\. \!G`
iQ. .._....\��\ ! \\<!'bi0 \. \�.. UO. �i\\. �. ) �\"!�.
\\\. \\\\.. 6. 9 -ii\ \ \ -ii \\ i \ O:
\ .., \
..yo!.,\s\\ �%.ol..o \.�.\ \!..\\ \lo.o. :c��\.
\4a `•\g\ �\;\\.���\�:
,a\\r, v.\o ,.�+ ,\ ` ��y,\.;°,��,I ; � \ \,
i1'
E
W
DEEP 50/50 MIX CLASSA
3
"
AND CLASS B RIP RAP.
a Permanent Culvert Crossin
s.4 (EF1 STA: 209+71)
Not to Scale
NOTES:
1. POSITVE DRAINAGE TO BE MAINTAINED FOR
FLOODPLAIN DRAINAGES GO�
2. PROPOSED GRADING IN DRAINAGES PER PLAN
3. GRADE BNKS BACK AT 2:1 MAX
2 Ditch Stablization
5.4 Not to Scale
` ROAD CRESTtle
ELEV.491.10 I
\ ` I
y
OUTLETSTATIONJ
209+88 I -
I
40" RCP (2)
INV. EL: 486.62 U/S'
INV. EL: 486.29 D/S i
I
I
A
I
I
I
I
I
`INLET STATION—_���__-- ----
209+49
-
I
ROAD TOP WIDTH 20'
1
I
10' OVERFLOW CHANNEL
— A'
rl
Cn 0
0 C5
++ U
C
F Z
0
U
0
Q �D
To
N
W
E
W
3
"

BUFFER WIDTH DIBBLE BAR
VARIES
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BANKFULL
BLADE WITH A TRIANGULAR NOTES:
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL
RESTORED
j/�\G�`%\/i
LONG, 4 1
THE
CHANNEL
`��`%i`
i`
�`�` NCHES WIDE AND 1 NCH
PLANTTIIING AREALS SHALL BEN
THICK AT CENTER.
DISKED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR
2'TYPICAL
TO PLANTING.
ROOTING PRUNING 2.
ALL PLANTS SHALL BE
SPACING PER
PROPERLY HANDLED PRIOR TO
PLANTING PLAN
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED
INSTALLATION TO INSURE
Section View
TO AN APPORIATE LENGTH
SURVIVAL.
TO PREVENT 1 -ROOTING.
1.5x CONTAINER
DEPTH�`ii`�i`
O O
3
O O
O
T
2x CONTAINER WIDTH
i
INSERTTHE DIBBLE, OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
INSERTTHE DIBBLE, OR
PUSH THE DIBBLE, OR PULL BACK ON THE
REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, STRAIGHT SHOVEL, AND PUSH THE
SHOVEL, SEVERAL
SHOVEL, DOWN TO HANDLE TO CLOSE THE
SHOVEL, AND CLOSE AND
DOWN INTO THE SOIL SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP
INCHES IN FRONT OF
THE FULL DEPTH OF BOTTOM OF THE
FIRM UP THE OPENING
TO THE FULL DEPTH OF INTO THE PLANTING HOLE.
THE SEEDLING AND
THE BLADE. PLANTING HOLD. THEN
WITH YOUR HEEL. BE
THE BLADE AND PULL PULL THE SEEDLING BACK
PUSH THE BLADE
PUSH FORWARD TO CLOSE
CAREFUL TO AVOID
BACK ON THE HANDLE UP TO THE CORRECT
HALFWAY INTO THE
THE TOP, ELIMINATING AIR
DAMAGING THE SEEDLING.
TO OPEN THE PLANTING PLANTING DEPTH (THE
SOIL. TWIST AND PUSH
POCKETS AROUND THE
HOLE. (DO NOT ROCK ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE
THE HANDLE FORWARD
ROOT.
THE SHOVEL BACK AND 1 TO 3 INCHES BELOW THE
TO CLOSE THE TOP OF
FORTH AS THIS CAUSES SOILSURFACE).GENTLY
THE SLITTO HOLD THE
�ContainerizedPlantin
SOIL IN THE PLANTING SHAKE THE SEEDLING TO
SEEDLING IN PLACE.
I-1 g
HOLE TO BE ALLOW THE ROOTS TO
5.5 Not to Scale
COMPACTED, STRAIGHTEN OUT. DO
Bare Root
Planting
INHIBITING ROOT NOTTWIST OR SPIN THE
1
GROWTH. SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE
5.5 Not to Scale
ROOTS J -ROOTED.
LIVE STAKE (TYP)
3' SEE PLAN VIEW
EROSION CONTROL
FOR SPACING
3' OUTSIDE TOP OF BANK
MATTING
INSTALL ADDITIONAL VEGETATION SUCH AS
OUTER LAYER 26 OZ / YD z
(SEE DETAIL)
LIVE STAKES, ROOTED SEEDLINGS, AND ETC.
COIR MATTING INNER LAYER 11.2 OZ.
/YD z
COCONUT FIBER BLANKET
JUNCUS PLUG (TYP)
����`�
% K
TOP OF BAN
�
a , i�✓G
Profile View B -B'
COMPACTED SOIL 12" TO 18" THICK
TOE OF SLOPE
LIVE CUTTINGS
BIODEGRADABLE EROSION
` `
Inset "A"
CONTROL FABRIC (SEE INSET "A")
\ \ '
Matting and Blanket
Section View
OPTIONAL LIVE FASCINE
BUNDLE OR 2' COIR LOG
HEIGHT
VARIES
2
SECURED WITH 36" STAKES.
2
5' SPACING FOR LIVE
UPHILL
TOE OF SLOPE STAKES
5' SPACING FOR JUNCUS
- FLOW STREAMBED
PLUGS
15°1
Plan View
1/2" TO 2"
2' TO 3' LIVE STAKE
DIAMETER
TAPERED AT BOTTOM
18" TO 36"
ROCK TOE PROTECTION
(CLASS B - VARIES PER
Live
Stake Detail
STREAM SIZE)
Section View
Typical Stakes
NOTES:
• ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITION OF THE LIVING PLANT
NOTES:
MATERIAL IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TIMELive
Staking & Juncus Plugs
OF INSTALLATION.
LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS
4
• BOTTOM OF FIRST COMPACTED EARTH LIFT TO BE
^ Veg etated
Soil Lift
SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY THE
5.5 Not to Scale
PLACED 6" ABOVE NORMAL BASEFLOW.
r 5 ,
ENGINEER.
• NUMBER OF COMPACTED EARTH LIFTS TO VARY
5.5 Not to Scale
DEPENDING ON DESIGN TOP OF BANK HEIGHT.
G0�
To
N
w

ECO -STAKE (TYP)
T MAX.
SPACING
ECO -STAKE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK
SECURE MATTING IN
WITH DOUBLED STAKES
(TYP)
(2) Erosion Control Matting
5.6 Not to Scale
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
NOTES:
• PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO
STREAMBED.
6" MIN
L
INTAKE HOSE
/PUMP
ACTIVE WORK AREA
DISCHARGE HOSE/
DEWATERING BAG
(SEE INSET "A')
TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN.
NOTES:
• USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND WITH A
MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING.
• USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH AND
FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
• PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE
STEELTYPE. ANGLE STEELTYPE.
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
BAG PLACED ON
AGGREGATED OR STRAW.,
10' DEWATERING
BAG
15'—
WIRE
8' MAX. WITH WIRE
(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
SHALL BE 12 2 GAGE MIN.
FILTER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL EXISTING GROUND LOQ
77
;,
8 STEEL POST
T-0" DEPTH
EXTEND FABRIC 4
INTO TRENCH
i21 Temporary Silt Fence
5.6 Not to Scale
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE EXISTING TERRAIN Z DEWATERING BAG
IN PLACE.
_WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP ;
FLEXIBLE 8" of CLASS B RIPRAP
DISCHARGE HOSE FILTER FABRIC
Inset "A"
Dewatering 15' to 20'
Bag
SAND BAG
(24" X 12" X 6")
OR STONE.
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
FLOW
STREAM BED
10'X S' STABILIZED OUTLET
USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC.
(SEE INSET "C")
Pump Around System
5.6 Not to cale
FILTER FABRIC
Inset "C"
� 8
E
To
N
w
STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
Inset "B"
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
IMPERVIOUS DIKE Impervious Dike
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
(SEE INSET "B")
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
10' MIN.
/ PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
10'X S' STABILIZED OUTLET
USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC.
(SEE INSET "C")
Pump Around System
5.6 Not to cale
FILTER FABRIC
Inset "C"
� 8
E
To
N
w

MUD MATS
X' DIM
WATER DIVERSION CHANNEL
Y
SUPPORTLOG /
12" 0 MIN. FILTER FABRIC
CLASS B
STONE
(2)Temporary Stream Crossing - Mud Mat
5.7 Not to Scale
NOTES:
• CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL BASEFLOW.
• MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. DO NOT EXCAVATE
CHANNEL BOTTOM.
• INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.
• MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES
NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
• STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE EDGE OF THE MUD MAT.
• CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP ANGLE ACCORDING
TO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
6' MAX. WITH WIRE
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
M ETAL W I RE TI ES
ORANGE SAFTY
FENCE
"T" OR "U" POST DRIVEN
MINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUND
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4' MIN.
18" MIN.
r3 -- Safety Fence
5.7 Not to Scale
SEED AND PLAN AS PER
BUFFER RESTORA"
6C M6MIVUVIVCU.
Ephemeral Pool
5.7 Not to 3-ca-fee
TO
SOIL
RIS AND BRUSH.
U?
g
tl°=�Noo
Z«rvnm
Q�arv�r.ir 6
z ^ m v
=� nn u
Anis
►� Y'^ z r li E
G0�
To
N
w
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
PHYSICAL PROPERTY
TESTS
REQUIREMENTS
MATERIAL
N/A
POLYETHYLENE
RECOMENDED COLOR
N/A
"INTERNATIONAL ORANGE"
TENSILE YIELD
ASTM D638
AVE. 2000 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH
ASTM D638
AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)
ASTM D638
GREATER THAN 1000%
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE
N/A
INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
6' MAX. WITH WIRE
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
M ETAL W I RE TI ES
ORANGE SAFTY
FENCE
"T" OR "U" POST DRIVEN
MINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUND
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4' MIN.
18" MIN.
r3 -- Safety Fence
5.7 Not to Scale
SEED AND PLAN AS PER
BUFFER RESTORA"
6C M6MIVUVIVCU.
Ephemeral Pool
5.7 Not to 3-ca-fee
TO
SOIL
RIS AND BRUSH.
U?
g
tl°=�Noo
Z«rvnm
Q�arv�r.ir 6
z ^ m v
=� nn u
Anis
►� Y'^ z r li E
G0�
To
N
w

❑)�
06-
;—.0Z«rvnm
3dV�
+Zmmy
Anis
►� Y'^ z r �i E
G0�
To
N
W
RADIUS OF TREE PROTECTIO
BARRIER PER PLANS.
OPO
70'
Plan View
6' WOODEN OR METAL "T" POSTS
CLASS A STONE
SHALL BE USED AS STANDARDS.
8" MIN. DEPTH
SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO
/\`
REMOVE ALL BRUSH AND
STANDARDS TO FORM BARRIER.
12
DEBRIS FROM INSIDE DRIPLINE.
3'
NOTES:
• PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE
LARGE TRUCKS.
3'
(7)
• LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS OF INGRESS
AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT
Construction Entrance
CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE. /-,
• MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT 5.8 Not to Scale
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC
TOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
• ANY MATERIALTRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE
Section View
CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
NOTES:
• USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE
Tree Protection
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
• ALLTREE PROTECTION BARRIERS SHALL BE
2
• PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
REMOVED PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR
5.8 Not to Scale
DEMOBILIZATION.
• SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF ALL TREE
PROTECTION BARRIERS.
r NO. 57 STONE
3
m p A
p O B
a
B'
w
O p
0
WORK AREA
A
a
O
CLASS B
a
20' RIPRAP
p
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THREE Plan View
CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT
DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PROJECT.
20' 2' MIN.
SPILLWAY CREST
NO. 57 STONE 4INCHES --4�
WIDE ON UPSTREAM FACnT
FLOW
CLASS B RIPRAP
Plan View �— 5' MIN.
Section A -A'
TOP OF BANK
3/3 STREAM
WORK 20 20 –1 WIDTH
AREA FLOW
6
MOM', ...
3
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE CLASS B RIPRAP
Profile View SEDIMENT WHEN DEPTH
REACHES I2". Section B -B'
TOE OF SLOPE
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam
5.8 Not to Scale
❑)�
06-
;—.0Z«rvnm
3dV�
+Zmmy
Anis
►� Y'^ z r �i E
G0�
To
N
W

APPENDIX 7
INVASIVE SPECIES PLAN

Appendix 7 Invasive Species Plan
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. If, during the
monitoring period, invasive species threaten the survivability of planted woody vegetation in an area
that exceeds 1% of the planted easement acreage, the invasive species shall be treated. Smaller areas
may be treated at the discretion of the project engineer and biologist, if deemed in the best interest of
the Site. Generally, the treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 1 for common invasive
species found in riparian areas; however, the treatment may be changed based on the professional
judgement of the project engineer and biologist. For invasive species not listed in the below table that
threaten the survivability of the planted woody vegetation, Wildlands shall notify DMS of the invasive
species observed and the plan for treatment prior to treating the species. All invasive species treatment
will be reported in the following year's monitoring plan.
Table 1. Invasive Species Treatment — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Invasive Species
Recommended Removal Technique
Small infestations of L. japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re -sprouts.
Care should be taken to bag and remove the plants, including mature fruits to prevent re-
establishment. Large infestations of L. japonica will usually require a combination of cut
Honeysuckle
stump and foliar herbicide treatments. Where vines have grown into the tree canopy, cut
(Lonicera
each stem as close to the ground as possible. Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted
japonica)
stem with a 25 percent solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Remove the twining vines to
prevent them from girdling and killing desirable vegetation. Groundcovers of L. japonica
can be treated with a foliar solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent
non-ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Depending on the maturity of the P. calleryana, the easiest method to use and does not
require any cutting is the basal bark method. The process uses of a mixed solution of 20 -
percent concentration of Garlon 4 (5 pints per 3 -gallon mix) in 80 -percent (20 pints per 3 -
gallon mix) mineral or vegetable oil, with a dye for observation purposes. Adding a 10 -
percent (2.5 pints per 1.5 -gallon mix) pine oil-based additive such as Cide-Kick II, will help
penetrate the bark. Applying a ready -to -use triclopyr, such as Pathfinder II, by spraying or
painting the mixture on the tree trunk at least 12-24" in height around the entire
circumference of the tree base alleviates potential damage to surrounding plants. This
method is most effective during late winter -early spring months but the ground cannot be
frozen and the bark must not be wet. Subsequent rain is inconsequential. The foliage
method is effective by applying a 2 -percent (8 ounces per 3 -gallon mix) of glyphosate
Bradford pear
mixed with water and 0.5 -percent (2 ounces per 3 -gallon mix or per label) of a non-ionic
(Pyrus calleryana)
surfactant to help penetrate the leaves. Using a 1.5 -percent (8 ounces per 3 -gallon mix) of
Garlon 4 may also be used. This mixture must be applied to dry leaves and green stems;
however, spray -drift damage to non -target species may occur. The air temperature should
be between 65-85°F to ensure herbicide absorption and no precipitation for 12 hours.
Another method, to avoid damage to surrounding stems and vegetation, requires cutting
the tree as close to the base as possible and immediately apply a 25 -percent (7.5 pints per
4.5 -gallon mix) solution of glyphosate mixed with water or 20 -percent (5 pints per 3 -gallon
mix) Garlon 4 plus 80 -percent (20 pints per 3 -gallon mix) oil dilutant, to the entire cut
stump. Timing of the application is key since the tree will seal the cut area to attempt new
growth; therefore, the application must be applied within 5-15 minutes after the cut. If
cutting the tree is not an option, use a hand axe to make downward -angled cut into the
sapwood around the tree trunk and apply a tablespoon of the prepare herbicide into the
cut. With moist soil, young saplings and roots may be hand pulled.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

Invasive Species
Recommended Removal Technique
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a
glyphosate herbicide as a 3 -percent solution (12 ounces per 3 -gallon mix) in the late fall or
early winter when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, or elsewhere, Arsenal AC*
as a 1 -percent solution (4 ounces per 3 -gallon mix). Backpack mist blowers can broadcast
glyphosate as a 3 -percent solution (12 ounces per 3 -gallon mix) or Escort XP* at 1 ounce
per acre (0.2 dry ounces per 3 -gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre) during winter for safety
to dormant hardwoods. Summer applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as
other times and require a higher percent solution. The best time for Arsenal AC* and Escort
XP* is summer to fall. For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding
vegetation is desired, apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20 -percent solution (5 pints per
3 -gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or
Chinese Privet
fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply
(Ligustrum
Stalker* as a 6- to 9 -percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3 -gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil
sinense)
product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where
permitted) to young bark as a basal spray making certain to treat all stems in a clump; or
cut and immediately treat the stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5 -percent solution (20
ounces per 3 -gallon mix) or Velpar L* as a 10 -percent solution in water (1 quart per 3 -
gallon mix) with a surfactant. When safety to surrounding vegetation is desired,
immediately treat stump tops and sides with Garlon 3A or with a glyphosate herbicide as a
20 -percent solution (5 pints per 3 -gallon mix) in water with a surfactant. ORTHO Brush-B-
Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut -stumps and available
in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants). For large stems, make stem injections
using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, Garlon 3A or a
glyphosate herbicide using dilutions and cut -spacings specified on the herbicide label
(anytime except March and April). An EZ-Ject tree injector can help to reach the lower part
of the main stem; otherwise, every branching trunk must be hack -and -squirt injected.
Recommended control procedures:
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant
(June to October with multiple applications applied to regrowth).
• Recommendation for mature grass control: apply Outrider* as a broadcast spray at 0.75
to 2 ounces per acre (0.2 to 0.6 dry ounce per 3 -gallon mix) plus a nonionic surfactant to
Johnson Grass
actively growing Johnsongrass. For handheld and high-volume sprayers, apply 1 ounce of
(Sorghum
Outrider per 100 gallons of water plus a nonionic surfactant at 0.25 percent. Outrider is a
holepense)
selective herbicide that can be applied over the top of certain other grasses to kill
Johnsongrass, or apply Plateau as a 0.25 -percent solution (1 ounce per 3 -gallon mix) when
plants are 18 to 24 inches (45 to 60 cm) tall or larger.
• Recommendation for seedling control: apply Journey as a 0.3 -percent solution (1.2
ounces per 3 -gallon mix) before Johnsongrass sprouts and when desirable species are
dormant or apply a glyphosate herbicide as a 2 -percent solution (8 ounces per 3 -gallon
mix) directed at the infestation.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017

APPENDIX 8
MAINTENANCE PLAN

Appendix 8 Maintenance Plan
The site shall be visited semi-annually and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
Table 1. Maintenance Plan — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Component/
Maintenance through project close-out
Feature
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in -stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations
of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel — these shall be conducted
where success criteria are threatened or at the discretion of the Designer. Areas where
Stream
storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to
prevent bank failures and head -cutting. Beaver activity will be monitored and beaver dams
on project streams will typically be removed, at the discretion of the Designer, during the
monitoring period to allow for bank stabilization and stream development outside of this
type of influence.
Routine wetland maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental installations of
Wetlands
target vegetation within the wetland. Areas where storm water and floodplain flows
intercept the wetland may also require maintenance to prevent scour that adversely and
persistently threatens wetland habitat or function.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
Vegetation
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species requiring treatment per the
Invasive Species Treatment Plan (Appendix 9) shall be treated in accordance with that plan
and with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
Site boundary
bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 8
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

APPENDIX 9
CREDITING INFORMATION

Appendix 9 - Credit Release Schedule
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built survey of the
mitigation site. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary
Department of the Army (DA) authorization has been received for its construction or the District
Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the project in the case where no DA
authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in consultation with the
Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently
to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where some performance standards
have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the specifics of the case. Monitoring may
be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the
specified performance standard. The release of project credits will be subject to the criteria described as
follows:
Table A: Credit Release Schedule — Stream Credits — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Monitoring
Interim
Total
Credit Release Activity
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements below
30%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
1
10%
40%
standards are being met
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
2
standards are being met
10%
50%
(additional 10% released at second bankfull event in a separate year)
(60%)
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
60%
3
standards are being met
10%
(70%)
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
65%
4
standards are being met
50/
(75%)
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
75%
5
standards are being met
10%
(85%)
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
80%
6
standards are being met
50/
(90%)
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance
90%
7
standards are being met and project has received closeout approval
o
10%
(100%)
Table B: Credit Release Schedule — Wetland Credits — Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Monitoring
Interim
Total
Credit Release Activity
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements below
30%
30%
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
1
10%
40%
being met
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
2
10%
50%
being met
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
3
being met
10%
60%
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
4
being met
10%
70%
WDeep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

1.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by DMS
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan.
b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property.
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; per the DMS Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
report has been produced. As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA
permit issuance is not required.
1.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after two bankfull events have occurred, in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than two bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the
DMS will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating
achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included with the
annual monitoring report.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
being met; Provided that all performance standards are met, the IRT may
5
allow the DMS to discontinue hydrologic monitoring after the fifth year, but
10%
80%
vegetation monitoring must continue for an additional two years after the
fifth year for a total of seven years.
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
10%
90%
being met
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
10%
100%
being met, and project has received close-out approval
1.1 Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by DMS
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan.
b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property.
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; per the DMS Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
report has been produced. As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA
permit issuance is not required.
1.2 Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream projects a reserve
of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after two bankfull events have occurred, in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met. In the event
that less than two bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the
DMS will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating
achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation will be included with the
annual monitoring report.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 2 October 2017

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
MEETING NOTES
MEETING: Post -Contract IRT Site Walk
DEEP MEADOW Mitigation Site
Yadkin 03040105; Union County, NC
DEQ Contract No. 6887
Wildlands Project No. 005-02162
DATE: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 @ 10:00 AM — 12:00 PM
LOCATION: McIntyre Road
Wingate, NC 28174
Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
David Shaeffer, USACE
Harry Tsomides, DMS Project Manager
Paul Wiesner, DMS
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands Engineering
John Hutton, Wildlands Engineering
Eric Neuhaus, Wildlands Engineering Assistant Project Manager
Materials
• Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal dated 3/15/2016 in response to DMS RFP 16-006785
Meeting Notes
1. Overview of project from farm road entrance off of McIntyre Road in Wingate, NC.
2. Discussed proposed project approach for both wetland rehabilitation and re-establishment and stream
enhancement and restoration. Site includes stream enhancement on Meadow Branch and UT3, stream
restoration on UTI and UT2, and wetland re-establishment and rehabilitation in the floodplain of
Meadow Branch.
3. There was general discussion about the Hydric Soil Investigation done for the proposal stage by Michael
Wood and Three Oaks Engineering. Soil units including hydric, hydric over hydric, non -hydric over hydric,
and non -hydric were defined for potential wetland restoration areas on-site. IRT agreed with the overall
information presented in the report and Wildlands noted this information would be used to guide
overburden removal and delineation of wetland restoration areas during design.
4. The field walk began at the existing ford crossing along Meadow Branch. The group crossed Meadow
Branch at the existing ford and observed high flow in the reach from precipitation the night before the
meeting. The overall condition of Meadow Branch was discussed as well as the proposed enhancement.
Wildlands noted that more significant bank repair work than might be typical of an enhancement two
approach may be necessary on Meadow Branch.

5. The Meadow Branch floodplain was planted in corn approximately 8 to 10 feet tall. Wildlands extended
an invitation to the IRT to set up another site visit in the fall after the corn in the floodplain has been
harvested.
6. Wildlands was asked about the potential for drain tiles on the site. Currently it is difficult to tell with the
floodplain in corn, but this winter after the corn is harvested a detailed inspection will be done for drain
tiles.
7. The group continued along the perimeter farm road that follows the western proposed easement
boundary to get an overview of topography and landscape position of the wetland restoration areas.
8. The group stopped at the upstream easement boundary for UT2 (just before the stream enters the
active corn field) to look at the flow and overall condition of the channel. Todd, Shawn, and Harry
walked upstream of project limits to look at the condition of UT2 in the wooded area upstream of the
agricultural fields. UT2 had steady flow in the channel the day of the meeting.
9. There was general discussion around intermittent channels and swales. The IRT prefers that these do
not comprise more than 20% of mitigation sites. Wildlands discussed our approach on limiting the
amount of intermittent channels in projects, but also noted the benefit of including these areas if there
is potential to eliminate major water quality stressors.
10. The field walk continued north along the western boundary of the proposed easement. The group
looked at the current ditch network and area proposed for wetland re-establishment in the left
floodplain of Meadow Branch. It was noted by both Wildlands and IRT that the ditch at the toe of slope
is negatively effecting wetland hydrology in this area.
11. The group entered the corn field in the left floodplain of Deep Meadow and took a soil boring to look at
in-situ soils and the possibility for wetland restoration. Overall, it was agreed upon by Wildlands and IRT
that the soil in wetland 1 was hydric and that the proposed approach of wetland re-establishment is
valid based on the existing ditch network, landscape position, and soil classification.
12. Overall the soils on-site are mapped as Chewacla but wetter areas are indicative of wehadkee inclusions.
13. The group continued into the potential reference wetland area on the parcel north of the proposed
project parcel in the left floodplain of Meadow Branch (PIN 09043010). Wildlands plans to install a
groundwater monitoring gage in this area for use during wetland design and monitoring but is waiting
on landowner approval. The group observed established vegetation and in-situ soils and confirmed that
the area was suitable for use as a reference wetland area for the project. The IRT noted that Meadow
Branch in this area was not in a reference condition. Wildlands agreed and maintained that the stream
would not be used as a reference for design.
14. Within the reference wetland area, there was general discussion about wetland design approach.
Wildlands noted that hydrology performance criteria will be set based on an iterative process using a
DRAINMOD hydrologic model and hydrology data from the proposed wetland reference area.
Additionally, Wildlands noted one other potential reference wetland upstream of the project that will be
considered as additional information for establishing hydrology performance criteria. The range of
wetland hydroperiod for performance criteria was listed between 7.5% and 12% in the proposal
documentation. Todd stated that the IRT would likely expect a higher hydroperiod for the proposed
project area.
15. There was general discussion about the use of soil temperature probes to set the growing season for
wetland hydroperiod. Wildlands and IRT agreed that the use of soil temperature probes can be valuable
for obtaining information about the growing season, however, regardless of recorded soil temperatures,
the beginning of the growing season should be set at a minimum of March 1.
16. Todd asked about anticipated grading for the removal of overburden material for wetland restoration.
Wildlands noted that hydrology data will affect the amount of overburden removal, but it is anticipated
that overburden removal would be required in wetland 1 (wetland in left floodplain at the downstream
end of the project) but that grading in depressional wetland areas such as wetland 2 would not be
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Post -Contract IRT Site Walk

necessary. Generally, depressional wetland areas will not be graded but ditch networks will be plugged
and depressional topography left. Corn growth in isolated depressional areas was stunted indicating a
high water table.
17. The group walked back over to the east side of the site to observe the current condition of UTI. On the
day of the site walk, UT1 had steady flow. Wildlands discussed why restoration was proposed on UT1
and it was agreed that this approach was appropriate. Wildlands noted that in some areas along UT1 the
proposed channel may tie to the exiting channel to take advantage of existing grade control.
18. There was general discussion about the use of wood in slate belt streams, and how low flows could
affect the longevity of grade control. Wildlands noted the concern and will consider this issue during
design.
19. It was noted that easement breaks will remain at existing crossing locations along Meadow Branch and
UTI.
20. David Shaeffer noted that Wildlands needs to ensure that Landowner Authorization forms are submitted
with Jurisdictional Determination requests to ensure that USACE has all the proper paperwork for right
of entry prior to site review. Additionally, it was discussed that the JD requests should be submitted via
hardcopy to the Asheville office and that the Asheville office will pass it on to David within 7 to 10
business days. Once David receives the package from the Asheville office, a time and date for site review
will be sent to Wildlands via email.
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. page 3
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Post -Contract IRT Site Walk

K
BedrockScour Wasting Incision Row Crop/Field
• =� i Reach Length (LF) Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
1 i. it Meadow 5% 76% 9% 0% 100%
i 3 _ Branch 2424
t• r r .. UTl 1219 16% 97% 3% 70% 100% �
_ • _ • _394 12% 84% 7% 76% 100%
-� , ! UT3 128 10% 52% 0% 51% 0%
'y `�! i ! Total 4165 9% 82% 7% 29% 97%
�I
r '
J f
VA
/ ; 1
1 � 1
�- l
' I 1
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement r
® Row Crops/Fields-
1 5
Wet Areas & Seeps ' f
Project Streams —
1 !�; r i
— Non -Project Streams j r c,
Ditches i I� f ■I •i
Field Swales
Cross Section
Incision ,
Mass Wastingr
Scour
Bedrock 1 r ! 1 1
Access Route If
Topographic Contours 5'
Headcut
Sediment Sample
v r 1
Q Pipe �'
'90 Of of
Figure 2 Site Map
WILDLAND 5 0
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I 300 Feet Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

Figure 6 Concept Map
WILD LANDS Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
%tv ENGINEERING 0 300 Feet
I I I I I Yadkin River Basin (03040105)
Union County, NC

APPENDIX 10
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE

Appendix 10 Financial Assurances
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service's In -Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has provided
the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to
satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS. This commitment provides financial assurance for all
mitigation projects implemented by the program.
W Deep Meadow Mitigation Site Appendix 10
DMS ID No. 97131 Page 1 October 2017

APPENDIX 11
DMS FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all DMS
projects. The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the
design phase of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain
Administrator with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer), NC
Floodplain Mapping Unit (attn. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC DMS.
Project Location
Name of project:
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site
Name if stream or feature:
Meadow Branch
County:
Union County
Name of river basin:
Yadkin
Is project urban or rural?
Rural
Name of Jurisdictional
municipality/county:
Union County
DFIRM panel number for
entire site:
5466
Consultant name:
Wildlands Engineering
Phone number:
704-332-7754
Address:
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Page 1 of 4

Design Information
Provide a general description of project (one paragraph). Include project limits on a
reference orthophotograph at a scale of 1" = 500".
Summarize stream reaches or wetland areas according to their restoration priority.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is completing a full -delivery project for the
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore or enhance 4,298 linear
feet (LF) of perennial streams, rehabilitate 0.6 acres of existing wetlands, and re-establish
8.2 acres of wetlands in Union County, NC. The project streams are summarized below.
Reach
Length
Meadow Branch
2,570 LF
Meadow Branch Tributary 1
1,201 LF
WF1
136 LF
WF2
391 LF
Meadow Branch and Meadow Branch Tributary 1 are mapped in a Zone AE Special
Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on Union County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel
5466. Base flood elevations have been defined but non -encroachment limits have not
been established. WF 1 and WF2 do not have designated SFHAs but do lie within the
SFHA of Meadow Branch.
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)?
6' Yes (' No
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined:
F_ Redelineation
F_ Detailed Study
FV_ Limited Detail Study
F_ Approximate Study
F_ Don't know
List flood zone designation:
Check if applies:
F AE Zone
r Floodway
r' Non -Encroachment
(` None
Page 2 of 4

F A Zone
r Local Setbacks Required
(` No Local Setbacks Required
If local setbacks are required, list how many feet:
Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway/non-
encroachment/setbacks?
(` Yes 6' No
Land Acquisition (Check)
F State owned (fee simple)
F Conservation easment (Design Bid Build)
P-1 Conservation Easement (Full Delivery Project)
Note: if the project property is state-owned, then all requirements should be addressed to
the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (attn: Herbert Neily,
919 807-4101
Is community/county participating in the NFIP program?
6' Yes (` No
Note: if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to
NFIP attn: State NFIP Engineer, 919 715-8000
Name of Local Floodplain Administrator: Mr. Brian Hawkins
Phone Number: 704.283.3642
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer/applicant following verification with the LFPA
F No Action
Fv No Rise
F Letter of Map Revision
F Conditional Letter of Map Revision
F Other Requirements
List other requirements: Local floodplain development permit application to be filed with
no -impact certification and flood impact assessment report.
Page 3 of 4

Comments:
Name: Aaron Earley, PE, CFM Signature: 4:2— s,
Title: Senior Water Resources En ig neer Date: 01/25/2018
Page 4 of 4