20180052 Ver 1_401 Application_20180118

-40 WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success.
January 8, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Kalas Fall Subdivision - Rolesville, Wake County - NWP 29 & NWP 3 PCN Submittal
Corps AID: SAW -2017-00595
WR Project #02090125.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Mitchell Mill Road Investors, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to
use NWP 29 for 0.006 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.023 acres of temporary wetland
impacts, 239 If of permanent stream impacts, 35 If of temporary stream impacts and 0.23 acres of
permanent open water (pond) impacts for construction of the proposed residential subdivision and
offsite sewer line. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above referenced
impacts and a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for 74,175 sf of permanent buffer impacts
and 8,976 sf of temporary buffer impacts for construction of the residential subdivision and offsite
sewer line.
We are also requesting a NWP 3,401 WQC and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for 62
If of permanent stream impacts, 0.01 acres of permanent open water impacts, 0.078 acres of
temporary open water impacts and 5,680 sf of riparian buffer impacts associated with the
rehabilitation of the existing pond dam in the southern portion of the proposed subdivision.
The project is±143.7 acres in size and is located at 1832 Rolesville Road in Rolesville, Wake County
(Latitude: 35.889487°N; Longitude: -78.458782°W). The project is located in the Neuse River basin
and onsite waters drain to Harris Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Harris Creek is C;
NSW and the Stream Index Number is: 27-26. The cataloging unit for the site is 03020201.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single family residential subdivision (NWP 29)
to meet the growing demand for single family housing in the Rolesville area. The project consists of
the construction of a 196 lot single family residential subdivision and associated infrastructure,
including roads, utilities, greenway trail and stormwater management and recreational area.
Additionally, the project requires the construction of an offsite sewer line, which will run from the
proposed subdivision to an existing City of Raleigh sewer line located northwest of the project on
Upchurch Lane.
219 Station Road, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Kalas Falls Subdivision %0 WithersRavenel
lipOw People. Your Success.
Additionally, the project also includes the rehabilitation of the existing pond dam (NWP 3) located
in the southern portion of the property. The existing dam is not structurally sound, and therefore
will be removed and reconstructed to current dam safety requirements. The dam will be
reconstructed primarilywithin the footprint of the existing dam, with minor deviations.
Project History
The USACE issued a Preliminary JD for the Kalas Falls project (SAW -2017-00595) on 05/09/17.
The Preliminary JD covers the Kalas Falls Subdivision project area (PINs: 1767178299 &
1767083228), as well as a portion of the offsite sewer located on the parcel owned by The Watkins
Family LLC (PIN: 1757994300). A copy of the PJD has been provided as an Appendix.
Please note that a Preliminary JD Request Specific to the offsite sewer located on PINs:
1768216907, 1758908610, 1758901417 & 1758902622 has been provided as an Appendix.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the Kalas Falls project (NBRRO #17-028) on
02/10/17. The Buffer Determination Letter covers the Kalas Falls Subdivision project area (PINs:
1767178299 & 1767083228), as well as a portion of the offsite sewer located on the parcel owned
by The Watkins Family LLC (PIN: 1757994300). A copy of the NCDWR Buffer Determination
Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
The subjectivity to riparian buffers is conceded with the offsite sewer line, and therefore a formal
Buffer Determination is not needed.
Proposed Impacts
NWP 29 - Subdivision
The proposed impacts for construction of the proposed subdivision under a NWP 29 consist of
0.006 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.023 acres of temporary wetland impacts, 239 If of
permanent stream impacts, 35 If of temporary stream impacts, 0.23 acres of permanent open water
(pond) impacts, 74,175 sf of permanent buffer impacts and 8,976 sf of temporary buffer impacts for
construction of the proposed subdivision and offsite sewer line.
The proposed permanent wetland and stream impacts will occur as a result of construction of
internal roads for access to developable uplands within the project. The proposed design results in
two perpendicular stream crossings for internal roads.
The first stream crossing (Area 2/Impact 6) will result in 92 If of permanent stream impacts
(perennial), 20 If of temporary stream impacts and 0.01 acres of temporary wetland impacts, as well
as 5,344 sf of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts and 3,393 sf of permanent Zone 2 buffer impacts.
The crossing has been designed to install two culverts, consisting of a 60 -inch RCP and 54 -inch RCP,
both of which are 78 -If long. The culverts will be installed at staggered depths, with the base flow
provided by the 60 -inch RCP, which will be buried at least 12 inches below the existing stream bed
to allow for aquatic life passage during periods of low flow. During construction, downstream flow
will be maintained by the construction of a temporary bypass channel to allow for work in the dry.
The cross-section and plan and profile details of the culverts, and detail for the bypass channel are
Page 2 of 6

Kalas Falls Subdivision :: WithersRavenel
Dur People. Your 5mcess.
noted on sheet G5A (Culvert C), which has been included in the Impact Exhibits. Please note that
the total buffer impacts for this crossing are less than 1/3 acre, and therefore is classified as
"Allowable".
The second stream crossing (Area 3/Impact 10) will result in 147 If of permanent stream impacts
(perennial), 15 If of temporary stream impacts and 0.003 acres of temporary wetland impacts, as
well as 8,098 sf of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts and 5,268 sf of permanent Zone 2 buffer
impacts. The crossing has been designed to install two 84 -inch RCP culverts, both of which are 118 -
feet long. The culverts will be installed at staggered depths, with the lower culvert being buried at
least 12 inched below the stream bed. Baffles will be installed on both ends of the culvert, and
throughout the culvert, in order to confine base flow to mimic the existing conditions. During
construction, downstream flow will be maintained by the construction of a temporary bypass
channel to allow for work in the dry. The cross-section and plan and profile details of the culverts,
and detail for the bypass channel are noted on sheet G9A (Culvert D), which has been included in
the Impact Exhibits. Please note that the total buffer impacts for this crossing are less than 1/3 acre,
and therefore is classified as "Allowable".
A road crossing has been designed to cross the onsite pond (Pond 1) at the head of the pond near
the southern property boundary, which will result in 0.23 acres of open water impacts (Impact 1),
as well as 9,094 sf of permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts (Impacts 2 & 3) and 7,060 sf of permanent
Zone 2 buffer impacts. The crossing has been designed to install two 48 -inch RCP culverts in order
to maintain downstream flowfrom drainage on the property to the south. This crossing is necessary
to meet the Town of Rolesville's interconnectivity and emergency management access
requirements. Additionally, these will become public roads, and therefore he Town of Rolesville
would not allow the road to be built across the dam due to future maintenance and liability issues.
Therefore, the road crossing was designed to cross the head of the pond in order to avoid additional
stream impacts associated with a road crossing below the pond. The proposed road crossing has
been aligned along and existing farm road above the pond. There is currently an undersized culvert
in the farm road that causes a backup of water on the adjacent property during rain events. The
overall upstream drainage will be improved by the proposed 48 -inch culverts. During construction,
drainage from the property to the south will be maintained through construction of a temporary
bypass channel to allow for work in the dry. The cross-section and plan and profile details of the
culverts, and detail for the bypass channel are noted on sheet G4A (Culvert A), which has been
included in the Impact Exhibits. Please note that the design of this road crossing is actually two
separate perpendicular buffer crossings, each of which is less than 1/3 acre of buffer impacts, and
therefore is "Allowable".
Impacts 6B (14 If) and 10B (28 If) result in 42 If of permanent stream impacts and will occur from
construction of rip -rap dissipator pads below the culverts for the road crossings. The rip -rap is a
requirement as a sediment and erosion control measure to dissipate velocity and prevent erosion
of the stream. The rip -rap dissipators have been designed so that the rip -rap will be buried such
that the top of the rip -rap matches the pre -construction elevation of the stream bed. This design
allows for the stream impact areas to continue functioning as a natural stream by maintaining
natural water depths and allowing for passage of aquatic life, and therefore will not result in
functional loss.
Page 3 of 6

Kalas Falls Subdivision :: WithersRavenel
Dur People. Your 5mcess.
The construction of the stormwater management system will result in 550 sf of permanent Zone 1
impacts and 3,776 sf of permanent Zone 2 impacts for grading for the BM Ps and construction of the
high flow bypass channels. The proposed wet detention ponds have been designed to meet TN and
TSS removal, and diffuse flow is not required.
The offsite gravity sewer will result in 0.02 acres of temporary wetland impacts, 5,979 sf of
permanent Zone 1 buffer impacts, 24,550 sf of permanent Zone 2 buffer impacts associated with
the permanent 20' easement for the offsite gravity sewer. Please note that the sewer easement has
been designed to cross the buffers perpendicularly, which is "Allowable". Where the easement is
located within the buffers running parallel to the stream, the alignment has been restricted to Zone
2 only, which is "Allowable". Additionally, the sewer has been designed to cross the streams via
aerial crossing in order to avoid stream impacts for construction of the sewer.
The construction of the sewer line will also require 5' temporary construction easement on each
side of the easement, which will result in 2,153 sf of temporary Zone 1 buffer impacts and 6,823 sf
of temporary Zone 2 buffer impacts. Upon completion of the sewer construction, the temporary
impact areas will be restored to natural grade and revegetated.
NWP 3 - Pond Dam Rehab
The proposed impacts for rehabilitation of the existing pond dam (Pond 1) consist of 62 If of
permanent stream impacts, 0.01 acres of permanent open water impacts, 0.078 acres of temporary
open water impacts, 3,915 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts, 465 sf of temporary Zone 1 impacts and
1,300 sf of temporary Zone 2 impacts.
The 62 If of permanent stream impacts (Impact 25) and 571 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts (Impact
29) will result from construction of a dissipator below the upgraded outfall, in order to prevent
erosion and sedimentation of downstream waters. Currently, the outfall channel has eroded
through the dam as a result of failure of the existing outfall structure.
During construction, a temporary cofferdam will be constructed within the bottom of the drained
pond in order to provide erosion and turbidity control for the existing drainage to the pond. Upon
completion of the dam reconstruction, the coffer dam will be removed.
The 0.01 acres of permanent open water impacts (Impact 27) and 646 sf of permanent Zone 1
impacts (Impacts 29 & 32) will result from reconstruction of the dam where the footprint of the new
dam extends outside of the existing footprint.
During the dam reconstruction, the non-functioning auxiliary spillway will be improved to the
correct size, and will consist of a vegetated spillway, which will result in 3,266 sf of permanent Zone
1 impacts (Impact 28).
The 465 sf of permanent Zone 1 impacts (Impacts 31 & 33) and 1,300 sf of temporary Zone 2
impacts (Impact 30) will result from grading for installation of sediment and erosion control
measures and temporary construction access for reconstruction of the dam. The temporary Zone
1 impacts and majorityof temporary Zone 2 impacts will occurwithin bufferthat consists of mowed
Page 4 of 6

Kalas Falls Subdivision %0 WithersRavenel
lipOw People. Your Success.
grass within the access around the pond. A very small portion of the outer edge of the Zone 2
impacts consists of forested buffer. Upon completion of construction, the forested portions of the
Zone 2 impact at Impact 30 will be replanted with tree saplings to restore the forested buffer.
Avoidance and Minimization
NWP 29
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to construct
internal roads to access developable uplands and construction of an offsite gravity sewer line to
connect the proposed project to an existing City of Raleigh sewer line located northwest of the
project on Upchurch Lane. Road crossings have been designed to cross the onsite perennial stream
at perpendicular angles to minimize stream and riparian buffer impacts. The road crossing at the
head of Pond 1 was designed to cross the head of the pond in order to avoid additional impacts to
the perennial stream from an additional crossing below the pond dam.
The offsite sewer line has been designed to cross the streams with aerial crossings in order to avoid
stream impacts. Additionally, the offsite sewer easement has been aligned to maximize use of
existing roads and driveways to minimize impacts.
The proposed dam reconstruction has been designed to minimize impacts as much as possible. The
dam will be reconstructed within the footprint of the existing dam where possible, with only minor
deviations as needed to tie dam fill to existing grade. The 62 If of permanent stream impacts are
necessary in order to install a dissipator below the outfall in order to prevent erosion and protect
water quality of downstream waters.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 197 If of permanent stream impacts for culverted road crossings
resulting in functional loss, and 42 If of permanent stream impacts for rip -rap dissipators that do not
result in a functional loss.
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 197 If of permanent stream impacts resulting in
functional loss at 2:1 ratio by purchasing a total of 394 If of stream mitigation credits in the Neuse
03020201 basin. WR contacted mitigation banks servicing the 03020201 basin, and there was no
stream mitigation available in private mitigation banks. Therefore, the applicant proposes to
provide the 394 If of stream mitigation through the purchase of credits from the NCDMS In -Lieu
Fee program. The NCDMS letter of acceptance has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 5 of 6

Kalas Falls Subdivision
Wetland Mitigation
NWP 29
%0 WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your 5ucce55.
The proposed permanent wetland impacts for the proposed subdivision are less than 0.10 acres and
permanent wetland conversion impacts from the offsite sewer line are less than 0.10 acres, and
therefore, the applicant is not proposing to provide wetland mitigation.
Riparian Buffer Mitigation
All proposed riparian buffer impacts for construction of the subdivision, offsite sewer and dam
rehabilitation are classified as "Allowable" in the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses,
and therefore riparian buffer mitigation is not proposed.
Stormwater Management Plan
The stormwater management plan consists of eight wet detention ponds which provide required
TN and TSS removal and therefore diffuse flow is not required. The stormwater management plan
will be reviewed and approved by Wake County.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• USACE JD for Kalas Falls
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter for Kalas Falls
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Offsite Sewer
• NCDMS Letter of Acceptance
• NWP 29 Impact Exhibits - Subdivision
• NWP 3 Impact Exhibits - Dam Rehabilitation
Page 6 of 6

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 & 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
®Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Kalas Falls Subdivision
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Rolesville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mitchell Mill Road Investors, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book: 011940; Page: 1155
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Julian Rawl
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 3557
3e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 3557
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-481-3000
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
WithersRavenel
5c.
Street address:
219 Station Road, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28405
5e.
Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
Subdivision — PINs: 1767178299 & 1767083228
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Offsite Sewer— PINs: 1757994300, 1768216907,
1758908610,1758901417 & 1758902622
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.889487°N Longitude: - 78.458782°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
±143.7 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Harris Creek (Peeples Creek)(Wake Crossroads Lake)
proposed project:
Stream Index: 27-26
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse - 03020201
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project currently consists of active agricultural fields in the southeastern portion, with the majority of the project site
consisting of undeveloped woodlands. Additionally, the project area contains two ponds and four streams and five
wetlands. The general land use in the vicinity consists primarily of residential and agricultural land use.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetlands - ±4.2 acres
Ponds - ±3.5 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Total - ±4,217 If
Intermittent - ±923 If
Perennial - ±3,294 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single family residential subdivision to meet the growing demand for
housing in the Rolesville area.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the construction of a 196 lot single family residential subdivision and associated infrastructure,
including roads, utilities, greenway trail and stormwater management and recreational area. Additionally, the project
requires the construction of an offsite sewer line, which will run from the proposed subdivision to an existing City of
Raleigh sewer line located northwest of the project on Upchurch Lane. Typical commercial construction equipment and
techniques will be used to construct the proposed project.
Page 3 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes [_1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The USACE issued a Preliminary JD for the Kalas Falls project (SAW -2017-00595) on 05/09/17. The Preliminary JD
covers the Kalas Falls Subdivision project area (PINs: 1767178299 & 1767083228), as well as a portion of the offsite
sewer located on the parcel owned by The Watkins Family LLC (PIN: 1757994300). A copy of the PJD has been
provided as an Appendix.
Please note that a Preliminary JD Request Specific to the offsite sewer located on PINs: 1768216907, 1758908610,
1758901417 & 1758902622 has been provided as an Appendix.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NCDWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the Kalas Falls project (NBRRO #17-028) on 02/10/17. The Buffer
Determination Letter covers the Kalas Falls Subdivision project area (PINs: 1767178299 & 1767083228), as well as a
portion of the offsite sewer located on the parcel owned by The Watkins Family LLC (PIN: 1757994300). A copy of the
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
NWP 29 Impacts for Proposed Subdivision
Impact 6D
(Wetland C)
Road Fill/ Backslopes
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.006 acres
®P❑T
(NWP 29)
Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
Total Permanent Wetland Impacts
0.006 acres
Impact 6E
Temporary disturbance
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
(Wetland C)
during road construction
Forest
❑ No
®DWQ
0.003 acres
[:1P ® T
(NWP 29)
Impact 17A
Temporary Construction
(Wetland K)
Easement for Sewer
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0.02 acres
❑P LOA T
Construction
Forest
El No
®DWQ
(NWP 29)
Total Temporary Wetland Impacts
0.023 acres
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.029 acres
2h. Comments: All proposed wetland impacts are associated with the NWP 29 request for the construction of the subdivision.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
NWP 29 Impacts for Proposed Subdivision
Impact 6A
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 3)
Road Crossing/Culvert
Creek
F1 INT
®DWQ
8'
78 If
® P El T
Impact 10A
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 3)
Road Crossing/Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
8'
119 If
®POT
NWP 29 - Total
Permanent Stream Impacts (Functional Loss)
197 If
Impact 6B
(Stream 3)
Rip-rap dissipator
UT to Harris
PER
®Corps
g'
14 If
®P ❑ T
(no functional loss)
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Impact 10B
Rip-rap dissipator
UT to Harris
PER
®Corps
(Stream 3)
®P ❑ T
(no functional loss)
Creek
F1 INT
® DWQ
g'
28 If
NWP 29 - Total Permanent Stream Impacts (No Functional Loss)
42 If
Impact 6C
(Stream 3)
e m 3
Temp Impacts During
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
g'
5 If
❑
Culvert Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Impact 6F
(Stream 3
3)
Temp Impacts During
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
g'
15 If
El
Culvert Installation
Creek
El INT
® DWQ
Impact 10C
F�7empFImpacts During
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
g'
5 If
(Stream 3)
Culvert Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Page 6 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

❑ PEI T
Impact 10D
Temp Impacts During
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
(Stream 3)
❑ e m 3
Culvert Installation
Creek
El INT
® DWQ
g'
10 If
NWP 29 - Total Temporary Stream Impacts
35 If
NWP 29 - Total Stream Impacts
274 If
NWP 3 Impacts for Dam Rehab
Impact 25
Construction of
(Stream 3)
dissipator below
UT to Harris
® PER
® Corps
8'
62 If
®P ❑ T
upgraded outfall for dam
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
rehab.
NWP 3 - Total Permanent Stream Impacts
62 If
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
336 If
3i. Comments: The NWP 29 request for the proposed subdivision includes 274 total If of stream impacts. The NWP 3 request
for the dam rehab includes 62 If of stream impacts.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
NWP 29 Impacts for Proposed Subdivision
Impact 1
Jurisdictional
(Pond 1)
N/A
Road Crossing
Pond
0.23 acres
® P El
NWP 29 — Total Permanent Open Water Impacts
0.23 acres
NWP 3 Impacts for Dam Rehab
Impact 26
Grading for cofferdam and
Jurisdictional
(Pond 1)
N/A
erosion control during
Pond
0.078 acres
❑ P ® T
construction of dam rehab
NWP 3 — Total Temporary Open Water Impacts
0.078 acres
Impact 27
(Pond 1)
N/A
Grading for expansion of
Jurisdictional
0.01 acres
®P❑T
existing dam footprint
Pond
NWP 3 — Total Permanent Open Water Impacts
0.01 acres
4f. Total open water impacts
0.24 acres
4g. Comments: Open water impacts will occur from construction of a road crossing at the head of the pond.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 7 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 8 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Buffer Impacts for Proposed Subdivision
Impact 2
Perpendicular
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
8,367
4,819
® P El
Road Crossing
® No
Impact 3
Perpendicular
UT to Harris Creek
El Yes
727
2,241
® P El
Road Crossing
® No
Impact 4
Stormwater
UT to Harris Creek
LlYes
N/A
376
® P [_1T
Outfall
® No
Impact 5
® P El
Stormwater
Outfall
UT to Harris Creek
El Yes
® No
N/A
285
Impact 7
® P ❑ T
Perpendicular
Road Crossing
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
® No
5,344
3,393
Impact 8
®P❑T
BMP/Outfall
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
®No
513
1,484
Impact 9
®P❑T
BMP/Outfall
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
®No
37
1,911
Impact 11
® P ❑ T
Perpendicular
Road Crossing
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
® No
4,059
2,656
Impact 12
Perpendicular
UT to Harris Creek
El Yes
4,039
2,612
® P El
Road Crossing
® No
Impact 13
®P❑T
BMP/Outfall
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
®No
N/A
96
Impact 14A
Sewer
❑ Yes
®P El T
Easement
UT to Harris Creek
®No
2,413
687
(Perpendicular)
Sewer
Impact 15A
Easement
El Yes
®P [_1 T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
®No
N/A
1,208
Perpendicular -
Parallel)
Sewer
Impact 16A
Easement
❑ Yes
®P El T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
®No
N/A
155
Perpendicular -
Parallel)
Impact 17B
Sewer
❑ Yes
®P [_1 T
Easement
UT to Harris Creek
No
1,471
2,663
(Perpendicular)
Sewer
Easement
Impact 18A
UT to Harris Creek
Nos
N/A
1,863
® P El T
perpendicular
®
— Parallel)
Page 9 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 10 of 17
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Sewer
Impact 19A
Easement
❑Yes
®P [-] T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
1,905
Perpendicular
- Parallel)
Sewer
Impact 2
Easement
El Yes
®P ❑ T T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
612
perpendicular
- Parallel)
Impact 21A
Sewer
❑ Yes
®P [-] T
Easement
UT to Harris Creek
No
2,095
2,067
(Perpendicular)
Sewer
Impact 22A
Easement
El Yes
®P E:1 T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
270
Perpendicular -
Parallel)
Sewer
Impact 23A
Easement
❑Yes
®P E:1 T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
3,335
Perpendicular -
Parallel)
Sewer
Impact 24A
Easement
❑Yes
®P [-] T
(Non-
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
10,472
Perpendicular -
Parallel)
Subdivision - Total Permanent Buffer Impacts
29,065
45,110
Temporary
Impact 14B
Sewer
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
790
275
❑ P ® T
Construction
® No
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 15B
Sewer
UT to Harris Creek
ElYes
N/A
932
❑ P ® T
Construction
® No
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 17C
Sewer
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
719
708
❑ P ® T
Construction
® No
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 18B
Sewer
UT to Harris Creek
®Nos
N/A
1,074
❑ P ® T
Construction
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 19B
El ® T
Sewer
Construction
UT to Harris Creek
®Nos es
8
1,167
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 20A
❑ P ® T
Sewer
Construction
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
® No
N/A
370
Corridor
Impact 21 B
TemporarySewer
El Yes
El P ®T
UT to Harris Creek
No
636
598
Construction
Page 10 of 17
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 11 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 22B
® P T
❑
Sewer
Construction
UT to Harris Creek
®Nos
N/A
666
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 23B
® P ❑ T
Sewer
Construction
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
® No
N/A
793
Corridor
Temporary
Impact 24B
® P T
❑
Sewer
Construction
UT to Harris Creek
® No
N/A
240
Corridor
Subdivision - Total Temporary Buffer Impacts
2,153
6,823
Subdivision - Total Buffer Impacts
31,218
51,933
Buffer Impacts for Proposed Dam Rehab
Impact 28
Grading for
El Yes
®P El T
Auxiliary
UT to Harris Creek
No
3,266
N/A
Spillway
Impact 29
Grading for
UT to Harris Creek
❑ Yes
571
N/A
® P ❑ T
Dam Rehab
® No
Impact 32
Grading for
UT to Harris Creek
® Nos
N/A
® P ❑ T
Dam Rehab
78
Dam Rehab - Total Permanent Buffer Impacts
3,915
0
Grading for
Impact 30
Erosion
❑ Yes
El P ®T
Control and
UT to Harris Creek
No
N/A
1,300
Temporary
Access
Grading for
Impact 31
Erosion
❑ Yes
❑ P ®T
Control and
UT to Harris Creek
No
29
N/A
Temporary
Access
Impact 33
Grading for
El Yes
El P ®T
Erosion
UT to Harris Creek
®No
436
N/A
Control
Dam Rehab - Total Temporary Buffer Impacts
465
1,300
Dam Rehab — Total Buffer Impacts
4,380
1,300
6h. Total buffer impacts
35,598
53,233
6i. Comments: All proposed riparian buffer impacts are classified as "Allowable". All proposed road crossings will cross the
riparian buffers perpendicularly and result in less than 1/3 acre of buffer impacts at each crossing. The proposed sewer
easement will cross the streams at perpendicular angles. The proposed sewer easement running parallel to the stream,
resulting in permanent non -perpendicular buffer impacts have been limited to within Zone 2 only, which is "Allowable". The
temporary sewer construction corridors will result in temporary impacts to both Zone 1 and Zone 2, and these are classified as
"Temporary Road disturbing more than 2500 If, which is "Allowable". The buffer impacts associated with the dam
rehabilitation are classified as "Allowable"
Page 11 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
NWP 29
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to construct internal roads to access
developable uplands and construction of an offsite gravity sewer line to connect the proposed project to an existing City of
Raleigh sewer line located northwest of the project on Upchurch Lane. Road crossings have been designed to cross the
onsite perennial stream at perpendicular angles to minimize stream and riparian buffer impacts. The road crossing at the
head of Pond 1 was designed to cross the head of the pond in order to avoid additional impacts to the perennial stream from
an additional crossing below the pond dam.
The offsite sewer line has been designed to cross the streams with aerial crossings in order to avoid stream impacts.
Additionally, the offsite sewer easement has been aligned to maximize use of existing roads and driveways to minimize
impacts.
NWP3
The proposed dam reconstruction has been designed to minimize impacts as much as possible. The dam will be
reconstructed within the footprint of the existing dam where possible, with only minor deviations as needed to tie dam fill to
existing grade. The 62 If of permanent stream impacts are necessary in order to install a dissipator below the outfall in order
to prevent erosion and protect water quality of downstream waters.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Installation of the culverts will be conducted in the dry by installing bypass channels to maintain flow during construction.
Access during construction will occur through high ground. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed around all
disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping into adjacent waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 12 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
478 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: NCDMS Letter of Acceptance provided as an Appendix.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments: All proposed buffer impacts are "Allowable" and do not require mitigation.
Page 13 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed wet pond SCMs provide sufficient nitrogen removal and
❑ Yes ® No
do not require diffuse flow. The diffuse flow requirements will be reviewed and
approved by Wake County during the review and approval of the Stormwater
Management Plans
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
23%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan consists of eight (8) wet ponds. The Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed
and approved by Wake County as the certified local government.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Wake County
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 14 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
® Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project does not have any currently planned future phases. However, the project will expand the City of
Raleigh's sewer system, providing connections to adjacent lands that could potentially be developed in the future.
However, future development on adjacent lands will be required to meet both state and Wake County stormwater
regulations, which will protect the water quality of nearby downstream waters.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
City of Raleigh sanitary sewer
Page 15 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data
did not identify any occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject
property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any
potential habitat for any federally protected species known to occur in Wake County, except for the Northern Long Eared
Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. The proposed project area contains forested areas with trees over 3" DBH, and therefore is
considered potential northern long eared bat habitat. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for the Northern Long -Eared bat
specifies that tree removal within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than
0.25 miles from known hibernacula and does not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other
trees within a 150 ft -radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). The proposed project is not
located within 0.25 miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees present on the project.
Additionally, clearing of mature forest between June 1St and July 31St is not anticipated for construction of the proposed
project. Therefore, WR concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-
eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review identified the Whitley-Bratcher House (HPO Site ID: WA1819) located on the eastern portion of property
near Rolesville Road. The Whitley-Batcher House consisted of a 1910's cottage and associated farm buildings. This
structure and farm buildings was demolished in 2010-2011, as noted in the SHPO records. There are no other historic
structures noted in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on historic
resources.
Page 16 of 17
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Beasley – WithersRavenel
:7-F—
-7IS
Authorized Agent
01/08/18
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 17 of 17
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1/ WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

-40 WitheFsRavenel
VA.Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Mitchell Mill Road Investors, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint
With_ersRavenet, Incas his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of
appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for the Kalas Falls Subdivision
project, located on Rolesville Road, at 1832 Rolesville Road, west of the intersection of
Rolesville Road and Taviswo_o_d Way in Wake Forest, Wake County, NC.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address &Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
Cary, NC 27511
Tel. [phone]
Date: ` Jc - 19
ature of Client:
(Name - Print) itie)
Sig tore)
ailing Address
Grk, IVC 'S)
City ' State Zip
Phone:
Email: 6110 5 •��✓ ��``"
115',,4acl<enan Drive I Cary, 1,K" 27511
919 469 3:.'340 i f: 919,467.6008 1 vvvvvv ,�/vithersraverneLcam i License No. C-0832
Cary I Creensborr) 1 Pittsboro I Raleijl) I Wilmington

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUAD (2013)

GRAPHIC
0 1000
SCALE
2000
1 inch =
N
2000 ft. o
M
O
Q
ONOR
SUNSES
D «l
Fol
l
W
\
nh: RD
i
MALOR DIR
� � �
RD
f/p� cN• ,
c
--
',
Fowler's" Crossroa
=�
c LAVE
OFFSITE SEWER
HARTSFI LELE p. ASEMENT ALIGNMENT
VERSAL, OR
A
J�
m �
_ KALAS FALLS
O
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
J
Iy�
(I
y50J
�
1
CUtNpSV
i
O
I
l�
O
ARtOr�DR_ t 1 f1 1
KALAS FALLS
ROLESVILLE WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2013) - ROLESVILLE
;! WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

GRAPHIC SCALE j
IJ 400 800 /� G •� _FA RD �G
1 inch = 800 ft.
QFFSITE -
EA MENIT
250
A
LAS FAL �Z�
I r U DIV ION BO NAR
1
O
KALAS FALLS USGS QUAD (2013) - ROLESVILLE ;! WithersRavenet
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
ROLESVILLE WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970)

GRAPHIC SCALE WkE PQ LwC DUB
0 400 800 LwC n
1" LoD OUC2' w '\ DuB
1 inch = 800 ft. �� �'�` �' OC
V v \ \.._ Lw t� -
WkE LwCWkE J OJC�
� 1 � WkE `'
Bu
LoD ` LOD \� DuB
u'
o v:: LoD,,
Wa APB2
LwC WkE 1 �� 'B ApC2 LOD �0 ` ��
' L wB ApC2
NkE �� _� A
� 1•y � � \ \ L yCz w' LwC. LwB LwC A B? Wy Cn
� .
LoD L p _
LwC ��__ . /' ApC2
<oO n / 1r` C C WY �c y ApB2
'WkE w DuB
\1 / �•0 v un DuB v DuB LOC
r �• _
�. V LwC Lw62
- --- T Lo B
LwC Me
• F
.... <
CN
v \ DuC 1 K DuB ApB DUB
t
V
ApC2
Me v Me LOD x DuB ApB Ap132 a n DuB
DuB x
LwC
J ` ,
�"kE LwB o
�LwC P � � A B 0.
v v / / �'Y �•� VB
` LoD 0
KALAS FALLS WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 31 & 32 WithersRavenel
1 / Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
E.",..WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USACE JD FOR
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: May 9, 2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: WithersRavenel Attn: Martin Richmond, 115
Mackenan Dr., Cary NC 27511
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-R, Kalas Falls, SAW -2017-00595
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The protect site is approximately 208 acres
located at 1832 Rolesville Rd. near the town of Wake Forest, Wake County, North Carolina, and is identified by
PINS 1757994300 1767083228 anti 1767178299. Please see the attached table and map entitled "Kalas Falls" dated
March 22, 2017 for approximate size and locations of aquatic resources on site.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake City: Wake Forest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.8894" Long.: -78.4587"
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Narne of nearest waterbody: Harris Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): March 22, 2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Preliminary JD Inventory Table
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated Amount of
Aquatic Resource in
the Review Area
Type of Aquatic
Resource
Geographic
Authority to Which
the Aquatic
Resource "may be"
Subject
Wetland A
35.886160°N
-78.450087°W
± 1.28 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.885578°N
-78.454990°W
± 1.61 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
35.886990°N
-78.455067°W
± 0.008 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
_
Wetland D
35.888621°N
-78.455362°W
± 0.87 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
35.890089°N
-78.455174°W
± 0.41 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland F
35.891012°N
-78.459228°W
± 0.08 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland G
35.891216°N
-78.459908°W
± 0.13 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland H
35.889259°N
-78.460842°W
± 0.11 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland I
35.890805°N
-78.460680°W
± 0.15 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Stream 1
35.885687°N
-78.450379°W
± 590 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 2
35.886071°N
-78.450010°W
± 231 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 3
35.890120°N
-78.455864°W
± 3,294 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 4
35.888651°N
-78.454962°W
± 102 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 5
35.890872°N
-78.459463°W
± 332 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 6
35.888641°N
-78.460649°W
± 1,094 Linear Feet
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Pond 1
35.883450°N
-78.453179°W
± 2.64 Acres
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Pond 2
35.8863270N
-78.450740°W
± 0.82 Acres
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Pond 3
35.891603°N
-78.460703°W
± 1.27 Acres
Non -Wetland
Section 404

I ) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative orjudicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terns and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: "Kalas Falls" dated March 22, 2017
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/del ineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: Simsuite NHD dataset
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Rolesville Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County 1970, sheets 31, 32
❑National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): undated
or []Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): 10 ft. LiDAR contours
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corns and should not be relied upon for later �urisdictiunal
determinations.
U41a0yskJ—d by
LASTINGER,JAME� GERJAA5GCw1363642400
363642400 oD,
S.C.1363642400 -LASTINGERJAMES.C.1363642400
Date: 2017 05 09 1337:31 -D4'W
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature andd of person
requesting PJ (REQUIRED;
unless obtaini g the signature
is impracticable) '
L Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

lip
do en
: _ F.
it
SFr. ��� '�:, , .' 'i e1 � � �x','-�", '�. ... a�.^ 'r } t d •— r, •
.. _ POND 3 WETLAND G �� `', STREAM 3
- . POTENTIAL WETLAND POTENTIAL
POTENTIAL
:AW WATERS OF U5 NDN WETLAND
NON -WETLAND i
WATERS OF US
WATERS OF US �,-
STREAM STOPS
WETLAND I+•. AND RESTARTS
.}'t ,'
POTENTIA
L WETLAND
AT CULVERT
;�L' - - •.# - '• _•, +� p a�{" WATERS{ of U5 � WETL
"4 ���• F
*�vm PQ7ENTlA
WETLAND F WATER
STREAM 5 POTENTIAL WETLANDr,f7uSTREAM 5 �� PpTEf+FT1AL WATERS OF ll5
r ► , '' _ .. POTENTIAL NON -WETLAND
NOid-WETLAN❑ WATERS OF US ST
REA -
WATERS OF US POTENTIAL
.
NON -WETLAND
WATERS 4 `; WETLAND D WATERS OF tls
ti R - WETLAND H POTENTIAL WETLAND� L
POTENTIAL WETLAND-
WATERS OF U5 WATERS OF US
, ww-
WETLAND C D
P NA _ -
x
DTE TI L WETLAN
Ii
s„
WATERS OF U5 � m � �.
PO
NON
,{ 'STREAM 2
B' --'POTENTIAL
WATERS
W ETLAN Dl ,
.�
# — :h3i�;� t ';•'{t�' POTENTIAL WETLANp
! e 1 a ►�5 cc.:� :° '�+; i �•• WATERS OF US
POTENTIAL 3 NON-IMETLAN 1
,� ►{ ' " S`a•,rrti ' y1` _ WATERS OF POTENTIAL-a�` �f* �� �4 y.1'� '1+ �- + �_ ''?� v �% •. ,• s.; • , y. `•: NON -WETLAND •
:: zY
WATERS OF US=
� . • ,� :�, TLAND A
*4`, - ! k t ; •r,� �•; ; ' ; POTENT _ ;5: POTENTIAL VYETLAND
T � �i0: NON-WEi `e wATEFkS OF US
WAT
_ - �. •�i`i�iR-' .' - .� ; '-'mil+%4 ?� ..�
Y' - .. i ��,k, it - ` - '� L � •4.
1 ; ` PONPOTIENTIAL
'
ON-WEI'i.AND,
u
ATE RS 13F'i!'
'=
• • ' We 0 c Am 10wil g i raWIN tolWOWLI ■ ■ • $;' ,� y •~- syr` r

�'! ji 7! iyri � a "` ' Z` �.. — . • �,�,,�,. ��. • .. a � 1 �' t. , fl' ,, .. A �� •' � ' � � � • •3 r r
Jam'• �' � �■ .. •t ,•' . -� - ati '� . S' `.,1 �. - { �... °'Y.- r �-�� r !-/,.�•� `yl� .f• .. .. 'ti tl._. -
.T w t � ixlu . w • - Y ■ '{ t 'Ik � �j. �L , �ti-.•'. �'. � _ s `._ {.-_ r ��` � �`' . -r — +
„•F.- -�.I � _ " � .yn, r �.,� � � r . �y � ! ;k Y '.l � /�,+ ' ; i Mli f. '■.Zc�, Vti.
y-�� r •� ,■■ +�r�. a. .. 1,`'7 .+ - •. 't � Il jt ` - x r�`+1 �j��Y.-.r .�*
y POND 3 WETLAND G
r
POTENTIAL 1 " POTENTIAL WETLAND
f NON WETLANE7 WATERS OF U5 ..
■ '''' ' -4' -k WATERS OF US
.. [s _ STREAM 3,
�,• �- _ ' .€ a STREAM STOPS AND POTENTIAL '
RESTARTS AT CULVERT NON -WETLAND
W ETLAND I
POTENTIAL WETLANY4 a'
t *. fir: •r »
WATERS OF U5
►, � + - Y.,'
WATERS OF US • • }+-€ �, _ = �,
14
�+• �+ • a� ! s' i ;fi' ;`moi i �° ` Ll'}r a
,, '", t "•' DP- WETLAND
r
t A{ { . d �_ DP -7&8 FLAG D -1Q
r r POTENTIAL WETLAND
R+j, r, FLAG E -S
Av WATERS OF US * .1 �r.� y ►"
►-. _ STREAM 5—
fA
STREAM fi
POTENTIAL POTENTIAL is SSL e :
y
NON -WETLAND
WETLAND E
WATERS OF US' ;£ W TERS OF US p''•+
.49{ .. k°+ POTENTIAL WETLAND
i, } �..� = WATERS OF US `.
* WETLAND H + l�." • ' f `
STREAM 4
ETLAND POTENTIAL Wx +
WETLAND D POTENTIAL
:• ,; WATERS OF US -
t- POTENTIAL WETLAND NON -WETLAND
WATERS OF US WATERS OF US
,'.or% }- y �.. i* ,•►`, »+'� ' '{• _
lk
, , + fit.' ' _ * ' = r .'*, s
tr
FLAG C-7
qp 1 �•��' _ � - • � • � I . h ■ � � fir-" �� y���`• f . +'� • • � .l
ov
'IL

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCDWR BUFFER DETERMINATION
LETTER FOR KALAS FALLS

Water R esources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Mitchell Mill Road Investors, LLC
P.O. Box 3557
Cary, NC 27519
Determination Type:
Buffer
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
February 10, 2017
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #17-028
Wake County
Intermittent/Perennial
❑ intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer
ordinances apply)
Kalas Falls
1832 Rolesville Road. Rolesville NC
Stream(s): Harris Creek (Peeples Creek) _
Determination Date: February 7, 2017 Staff: Stephanie Goss
Stream I E/I/P* I Not
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
USGS
Subject
Survey
To o
A
X
B
X
DWR flag S-5 Flows into Pond 3
X
(lat: 35.884634,
long: -78.449868)
Off property Flows into F
C
X
X
X
D
X
X
E
X
X
F
X
DWR flag S-4 Off property
X
X
G
X
Off pro erty
X
X
H
X
DWR flag S-2 Flows into I (Pond
X
(lat: 35.890891, 4)
long: -78.459457)
I
X
DWR flag S-3 Off property
X
(lat: 35.888648, (flows into
long: -78.460651) Pond 5)
Pond 1
X
X
Pond 2
X
X
X
Pond 3
X
X
[)ivislon of '`tater Resources, RaleI_g11 Kc, R)nal l.)ttice, 4Vatcr tluallty uperatlons )ccuo❑ nllt/,/i I nn lit I.I'�u 'Itwv r: "4;-11.>
1628 N1 ail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 2-7699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drivc, Ralcigh. NC 27009 fax: [phone]

Kalas Falls
Wake County
February 10, 2017
Page 2 of 3
Stream I E/UP*
Pond 4
Pond 5
Not 1 Subject
*EIIIP = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
Start@ Stop@ I Soil USGS
I 1 Survev ` T000
X_
X
Explanation: The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake
County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of tate USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,900 scale. Each
stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present. Streams
that are checked "Subject' have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be at least
an intermittent stream. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps
referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-I6I7. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US %rmy Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regard' this determination, please feel free to contact Stephanie Goss at [phone].
Sin�erel , f
Danny Smith
Supervisor, ater Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Martin Richmond, WithersRavenel, 115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511

�10,v
o
I
Zt;
N
I
`
N
C Nn
cx
��
� v
LL.1 1
� `•.
I
�
� rm c a
d to
LL
LL
LLIu
�
'
f
Nool
L` 4".
� —
°1
�.
W
w
LL
�`�}
VI-
w
i
--
r
Ln
�
,
rn
Cl.
a
MANLY- FARM RD
Lu
Q:.,
Q
k
Qa
u
fqW
�..
U
d u
GG
i WON
o
C T
.O
n yy O
o E u
` X `
Q 0 CL
] O
Vw
Z v CL
m
� � w
N
v � a
a 3:o
o o
CL o a
CL J a)
� m
c
O
v
V)
2
ro
E
X
O

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PJD REQUEST FOR OFFSITE
SEWER ALIGNMENT

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 5016 Upchruch Lane
City, State:
Wake Forest, NC
County: Wake County
Parcel IndexNumber(s) (PIN): See Property Owner Exhibit
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: We Phillips - WithersRavenel
Mailing Address: 115 MacKenan Drive
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Z
Cary, NC 27511
919.535.5165
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See Attached Authorization Form
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Attached Authorization Form
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOVUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area ± 2.12 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.892774°N
-78.461100°W
F7A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
ul Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug lato!3 -Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
✓0 USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorL/re2docs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.g.M.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lyle Phillips — WithersRavenel; 115 MacKenan Drive,
Cary, NC 27511
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Located east of Manly Farm Road, west of
Rolesville Road and south of Unchurch Lane in Wake Forest.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake Count City: Wake Forest
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.892774N Long.: -78.461100°W
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Harris Creek (Peeples Creek) (Wake Crossroads Lake)
Stream Index: 27-26
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non-
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404
Stream 3
35.892601N
-78.4578°W
Non -wetland
Section 404
(Not in N/ ewArea)
35.8927°N
-78.4609°W
Stream 6
± 30 Linear Feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
35.8926°N
-78.4575°W
N/A
Stream 7
Non -wetland
Section 404
(Not in Review Area)
Stream 8
35.8939°N
-78.4628°W
(Harris
± 50 Linear Feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Creek)
Wetland
35.8928°N
-78.4612°W
J
± 0.01 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland
35.8928°N
-78.4611°W
± 0.01 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
K
Pond 5
35.8941°N
-78.4604°W
Non -wetland
Section 404
(Not in Review Area)

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fords that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Lyle
Phillips - WithersRavenel
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS Rolesville Quad (2013); 1:24k
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County Soil Survey (1970) — Sheet 31
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Aerial (2013) — nconemap.com
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations. 10.05.2017
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Lyle Phillips — Authorized Agent
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

■■ WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
Kalas Falls - Offsite Sewer
WR Project No. 02090125.00
Jurisdictional Determination Request Information
AApplicant- Mitchell Mill Investors
PO Box 3557
Cary, NC 27519
Property Owner - See Property Owner Exhibit
Physical Address - Located east of Manly Farm Road, west of Rolesville Road and south
of Upchurch Lane in Wake Forest
Written Authorization: See attached Authorization form
Nearest Municipality- Rolesville
County - Wake County
PIN - Wake County PIN# 1758912130, 1768216907, 1758901417,
1758902622 & 1758908610
Drainage Basin - Neuse River Basin
HUC Code: 03020201
Receiving Waters - Harris Creek (Peeples Creek) (Wake Crossroads Lake)
Stream Index: 27-26
Classification: Class C; NSW
Decide reg_es - 35.892774'N; -78.461100°W
USGS Quad Map - Rolesville Quadrangle
Soils Map - Wake County Soil Survey - Sheet 31
Total Area - Review Area (offsite sewer) - ± 2.12 acres
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
PIN: 1758901417
ROBERT BALLANCE &
ROBIN BALLANCE
3522 US 401 HWY S
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
PIN:1758912130
STEPHEN BURROWS & DONNA BURROWS
5025 UPCHURCH LANE
WAKE FOREST, NC 27587
PIN:1758902622
EDWIN MILLER & EILEEN MILLER
PO BOX 744
ROLESVILLE, NC 27571
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER
REVIEW AREA
(OFFSITE SEWER)
PIN: 1758908610
JONATHAN GILLIS
204 CREEKS EDGE
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
PIN: 1768216907
JOSEPH WALL & BETTY GUNZ
1409 MARYLAND AVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28209
PROPERTY OWNER EXHIBIT
40 WithersRavenel
100 Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

IV
PIN: 1758901417
PIN Ext: 000
00589
Heat Area: 0
Real Estate ID: 0188744
Site Address: 5008 UPCHURCH LN
Map Name: 1758 04
City:
Owner: BALLANCE, ROBERT M BALLANCE,
Township: Wake Forest
ROBIN E
Year Built: 0
Mail Address 1: 3522 US 401 HWY S
Sale Price: $0
0 220 440 880 ft
Mail Address 2: LOUISBURG NC 27549-9056
Sale Date:
I i i i I i i i
Mail Address 3:
Use Type:
1 inch = 400 feet
Deed Book: 013321
Design Style:
Deed Page: 00687
Land Class: Vacant
Deed Date: 12/12/2008
Old Parcel Number: --
Deed Acres: 5.01
Building Value: $0
Disclaimer
Land Value: $140,260
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
Total
TotalValue: $140,260
the most current and accurate information possible.
Billing Class: Individual
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
Description: TRB RHONDA TESTA BM2004 -
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

IV
PIN: 1758902622
PIN Ext: 000
00589
Heat Area: 3784
Real Estate ID: 0370522
Site Address: 5016 UPCHURCH LN
Map Name: 1758 04
City:
Owner: MILLER, EILEEN M MILLER, EDWIN R
Township: Wake Forest
JR
Year Built: 1999
Mail Address 1: PO BOX 744
Sale Price: $650,000
0 220 440 880 ft
Mail Address 2: ROLESVI LLE NC 27571-0744
Sale Date: 12/10/2008
1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1
Mail Address 3:
Use Type: SINGLFAM
1 inch = 400 feet
Deed Book: 013319
Design Style: Conventional
Deed Page: 01786
Land Class: Residential Less Than 10 Acres
Deed Date: 12/10/2008
Old Parcel Number: --
Deed Acres: 4.92
Building Value: $390,819
Disclaimer
Land Value: $137,920
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
Total
TotalValue: $528,739
the most current and accurate information possible.
Billing Class: Individual
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
Description: TRA RHONDA TESTA BM2004 -
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

\_0
PIN: 1758908610
PIN Ext: 000
Real Estate ID: 0163469
Map Name: 1758 04
Owner: GILLIS, JONATHAN V
Mail Address 1: 204 CREEKS EDGE
Mail Address 2: CHAPEL HILL NC 27516-8963
Mail Address 3:
Deed Book:
Deed Page:
Deed Date: 11/18/2015
Deed Acres: 9.99
Building Value: $154,616
Land Value: $269,740
Total Value: $424,356
Billing Class: Individual
Description: TR2 RECOMB FOR ROBERT H
TESTA BM1987 -1527
Heat Area: 2750
Site Address: 5028UPCHURCH LN
City:
Township: Wake Forest
Year Built: 1989
Sale Price: $47,500
Sale Date: 10/02/1987
Use Type: SINGLFAM
Design Style: Conventional
Land Class: Residential Less Than 10 Acres
Old Parcel Number: 310-00000-0031
`i
N
0 220 440 880 ft
I t t t I t t t I
1 inch = 400 feet
Disclaimer
tMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

utor
yr
aG
00299
Heat Area: 2480
IV
PIN: 1758912130
PIN Ext: 000
00299
Heat Area: 2480
Real Estate ID: 0250971
Site Address: 5025 UPCHURCH LN
Map Name: 1758 04
City:
Owner: BURROWS, STEPHEN M BURROWS,
Township: Wake Forest
DONNA B
Year Built: 2000
Mail Address 1: 5025 UPCHURCH LN
Sale Price: $0
0 220 440 880 ft
Mail Address 2: WAKE FOREST NC 27587-6374
Sale Date:
I i i i I i i i
Mail Address 3:
Use Type: SINGLFAM
1 inch = 400 feet
Deed Book: 008263
Design Style: Conventional
Deed Page: 01108
Land Class: Residential Less Than 10 Acres
Deed Date: 03/04/1999
Old Parcel Number: 310-00000-0000
Deed Acres: 3.42
Building Value: $238,048
Disclaimer
Land Value: $98,920
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
Total
TotalValue: $336,968
the most current and accurate information possible.
Billing Class: Individual
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
Description: L03 BL300 BUPROP 0 BM1999 -
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

I V
PIN: 1768216907
PIN Ext: 000
Heat Area: 0
Site Address: 0 ROLESVILLE RD
Real Estate ID: 0060992
City:
Map Name: 1768 03
Township: Wake Forest
Owner: WALL, JOSEPH E GUNZ, BETTY R
Year Built: 0
Mail Address 1: 1409 MARYLAND AVE
Sale Price: $0
Mail Address 2: CHARLOTTE NC 28209-1527
Sale Date:
0 430 860 1,720 ft
Mail Address 3:
Use Type:
I t t t I t I I
Deed Book: 005178
Design Style:
1 inch = 800 feet
Deed Page: 00858
Land Class: Forestry
Deed Date: 04/24/1992
Old Parcel Number: 310-00000-0010
Deed Acres: 125.18
Building Value: $0
Land Value: $2,978,170
Disclaimer
Total Value: $2,978,170
tMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
Billing Class: Individual
the most current and accurate information possible.
Description: PTTR3 & TR5 W W & J N ROGERS
p
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
DIV 85-1806
are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft. t ��
t , �
4 Y. V
fir. •�' .. T�
r
rNOTES:
= 1) 1OFT LIDAR CONTOURS DEPICTED.
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER AERIAL - 2013 10 WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300 t
i•. P
1 inch = 300 ft.
r ,
4
C.!!
M
POND
5.•
POTENTIAL
NON-WETLAN
WATERS
OF US
C.!!
M
1
Vk
~,
NOTES: c
1) WETLAND DELINEATION OF THE OFFSITE SEWER EASEMENT PERFORMED BY WR ON 08/30/2017. '
2) WETLAND DELINEATION WITHIN KALAS FALLS BOUNDARY WAS FIELD VERIFIED BY JAMES
ILASTINGER
OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON 03/22/2017 (AID#: SAW -2017-00595).
3) WETLAND/STREAM/POND LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS LOCATION, WAKE CO. ,
GIS DATA, AND AERIAL & TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
4) 1OFT LIDAR CONTOURS DEPICTED.
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER
WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
10 WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners 1 Surveyors
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1000 2000
1 inch = 2000 ft.
RD 1
c
rff
ifro
L
1
` -REVIEW AREA /�
�cxrty 1 f '2
,LH(ERD�, `
L
Fowlers Crossroads
� R��)if;Q,11
-)\S
Luke
MA
um Rne. 1 1
ke
� y r
/
I /L350
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
USGS QUAD (2013) - ROLESVILLE
1! Engineers I Planners I Surveyors WithersRavenel

GRAPHIC SCALE ! -ti
0 150 300 l
i
1 inch = 300 ft.
r
r
f � �
REVIEW AREA r
(OFFSITE SEWER) f
f � f
r l l
r Q
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER USGS QUAD (2013) - ROLESVILLE WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
LwC
KALAS FALLS OFFSITE SEWER
WAKE COUNTY NOI
o u B
L w C L�
� LoD � DuG
0 -q
bsul"I",
WkE
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1970) - SHEET 31
46.
LwC
o Wkjj
VEM.W . -
WkE LoD,,
�v
LwB
r,
C2
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Kalas Falls - Offsite Sewer City/County: Wake Forest/Wake County Sampling Date: 08.30.2017
Applicant/Owner: Mitchell MITI Investors State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): M. Richmond & L. Phillips - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): <11%
Subregion (LRR or MLR. 0. LRR P Lat: 35.892856613 Long: -78.461160329 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE - Wake soils, 10 to 25 percent slopes NWI classification: Headwater Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
❑ Is the Sampled Area
0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes ❑x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
This sampling point is located within Wetland K near Flag A-3, at the Lat/Long specified above
This data form also applies for Wetland J, as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
[l Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
a High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
BWater
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
J❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
l Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
0 FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): >24"
Saturation Present?
Yes No__g Depth (inches): >24"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yesnx No n
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology was present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. None
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
❑
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
❑
3
4.
❑
❑
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
6.
❑
❑
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7.
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
1 None
❑
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. ❑
3.
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0% = Total Cover
Shrub StratumPlot size: 15' Radius
( )
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 5%x❑ FAC
2 Alnus serrulata
5%
x❑ OBL
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_$.0
3
4
5.
6
7.
Herb Stratum Plot size: 5' Radius
( )
1 Microstegium vimineum
10%
80%
❑
❑
❑
= Total Cover
x❑ FAC
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2 Boehmeria cylindrica
80%
0 FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3 Scirpus spp.
20%
❑ FACW
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
11.
12.
❑
❑
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
180%
= Total Cover
1•None
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
5•
00/o
❑
❑
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x❑ No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
The vegetation at this sampling point was hydrophytic.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0" - 14" 10YR 3/2 75%
7.5YR 4/6 25% C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -[-] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) fl Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Matrix S6)
Stripped (
Dark Surface x (S (LRR P, S, T, U)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
__0[�
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x❑ No ❑
Remarks:
The soils at this sampling point were hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Print Form
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Kalas Falls - Offsite Sewer City/County: Wake Forest/Wake County Sampling Date: 08.30.2017
Applicant/Owner: Mitchell MITI Investors State: INC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): M. Richmond & L. Phillips - WR Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): <11%
Subregion (LRR or MLR. 0. LRR P Lat: 35.892856613 Long: -78.461160329 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE - Wake soils, 10 to 25 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x❑ No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑x No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1:1❑ No x Within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks
This sampling point is located within uplands adjacent to Wetland K near Flag A-3, at the Lat/Long specified above.
This data form also applies for uplands adjacent to Wetland J, as conditions were similar.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
[l Surface Water (Al)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
a High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
BWater
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
E] Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ FAC -Neutral Text (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches): >24"
Saturation Present?
Yes No__g Depth (inches): >24"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No nx
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was not present at this sampling point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Ilex opaca
Absolute
% Cover
15%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
x❑ FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2. Pinus taeda
5%
x❑ FAC
3. Quercus laurifolia
4.
5%
E] FACW
❑
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
6.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 29% (A/B)
7.
❑
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' Radius )
25%
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
1 Carya cordiformis
5%
x❑ FACU
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. Juniperus virginiana 5% x❑ FACU
3.
❑
FACU species x 4 =
4.
❑
UPL species x 5 =
5.
❑
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
❑
7
❑
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
10% = Total Cover
Shrub StratumPlot size: 15' Radius
( )
1 Juniperus virginiana 15% x❑ FACU
2 Ilex opaca
5%
x❑ FACU
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_$.0
3
4
5.
6
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' Radius )
1 None
20%
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
= Total Cover
❑
— 4 - Morphological Adapations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2.
3
4
5.
6
7.
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
©
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
0%
= Total Cover
1•None
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
5•
00/o
❑
❑
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No ❑x
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
The vegetation at this sampling point was not hydrophytic.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0" - 14" 10YR 6/3 100%
Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Q Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2)
0 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -[-] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) fl Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_� Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Matrix S6)
Stripped (
Dark Surface x (S (LRR P, S, T, U)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
__0[�
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No x❑
Remarks:
The soils at this sampling point were not hydric.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCDMS LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE

Udgation Ser lices
E44V WON MENTAL (WAL!TY
October 6, 2017
Julian Rawl
Mitchell Mill Road Investments, LLC
100 Weston Estates Way
Cary, NC 27513
Project: Kalas Falls Subdivision
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Seciv/an
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/5/2017
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location
(8 -digit HUG
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Neuse
03020201
Warm Stream
239
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Troy Beasley, agent
Sincerely,
Jaynes. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
SUBDIVISION IMPACT EXHIBITS - NWP 29

1
-� 'M -LINE
ARE 6 SHT H
190 191
192
AREA 5 184 189 193
SHT G
- - I 183 188
194
182 187
195
F ; 186
MATQF"- IIS \ 196
185
=_ 181
I ZI 180
AREA 7 J ---- ------ AREA 3
SHT 1i 183 =I 179 1 175 BMP SHT W4
#s
� 178 174
177 173
I176 172 170 169 \
171
115 � 116 117 #3P 118119 120 121 ' 168
114 I - 166 167
161
i 126 125 124 123 122 147 165
160
C 112 \ 164
AREA 7 I` 111 127 \ 148 159 163
144 145 146
SHT 1 I i 128 143 , 149
110 1
158 162
29 _
142 - ___ 150 157 AREA 2
]�Jj 117 BMP
115 B 2 141 140 P 130 139 138 151 156 SHT B (WETLAND + STREAM)
116 #3 I BMP SHT C (BUFFER)
114 131 155 � #4
BMP
NUMBER
BMP
TYPE
1
WET
POND
2
WET
POND
3
WET
POND
4
WET
POND
5
WET
POND
6
WET
POND
8
WET
POND
9
WET
POND
137 152
109 �
132 133 134 135 136153 154 96 �J
108 BMP
—1---, - �,
107 95 #6 4
106 � u— — 23 21 20 19 18 17 �
gMp jt3j 102 101 100 99 98 97 \ P4 22 16 BMP
15 3
#i 94
93 25 �•�.-, #8
14 5 i
92 26 7 28 2 29 30 31 32
84 33 13 6
91
83 _
34 12 7
BM
82 #5 64 63 62 61 35 11 8
60 10 '
81 90 `� 59 36
9
RECREATION
80 '
\ 89 65 67 58 37 42 AREA
66 '
57 38 41
79 88 68 39 40
69 56
77 78 \ 87
70 55 54 53 \ 45 44 43 I
76 71 '
73 85 AREA 1 ,,_-_-__- �_._._-------
75 74 HT 51 50 49 48 47 46 OS '
72 ! 52
I
OVERALL IMPACT MAP Hu�l� �J. Gilleece and Associates KAI-AS FALLS 8UBr_>IVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B u S I n e S S L I C . # C - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55SHT:
ON-SITE 4375 Walrmut Street Suite 360 Cary, NC PI -%one= C919i

MAP
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
WETLAND AND STREAM
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
STREAM
WETLAND
STREAM
WETLAND
OPEN WATER
(LF)
(SF)
(AC.)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC.)
(SF)
(AC.)
A
1
ROADWAY
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
9,922
0.23
B
6A
ROADWAY/
CULVERT
--
--
--
78
648
--
--
--
--
B
6B
RIP RAP
--
--
--
14
127
--
--
--
--
B
6C
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
B
6D
ROADWAY
--
--
--
--
--
259
0.006
--
--
B
6E
ROADWAY
--
142
0.003
SEWER
--
--
--
--
--
B
6F
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
15
--
--
--
15A
--
--
--
--
D
10A
ROADWAY/
CULVERT
--
--
--
119
999
--
--
--
--
D
10B
RIP RAP
--
--
--
28
307
--
--
--
--
D
10C
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
5
--
G
18A
SEWER
--
--
--
--
D
10D
ROADWAY
10
--
--
--
--
--
0.000
--
--
G
17A
SEWER
--
1,032
0.02
1,167
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
TOTAL
35
1, 174
0.03
239
2,081
12,633
0.29
9,922
0.23
MAP
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
BUFFER
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
A
2
ROADWAY
--
--
B. 367
4,819
A
3
ROADWAY
--
--
727
2,241
A
4
STORMWATER
OUTFALL
--
--
--
376
C
5
STORMWATER
OUTFALL
--
--
--
285
C
7
ROADWAY
--
--
5, 344
3, 393
C
8
BMP/
OUTFALL
--
--
513
1,484
C
9
BMP/
OUTFALL
E
11
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 059
2, 656
E
12
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 039
2,612
E
13
BMP/
OUTFALL
--
--
--
96
F
14A
SEWER
--
--
2,413
687
F
14B
SEWER
790
275
--
--
F
15A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,208
F
15B
SEWER
N/A
932
--
--
F
16A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
155
G
17B
SEWER
--
--
1,471
2, 663
G
17C
SEWER
719
708
--
--
G
18A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,863
G
18B
SEWER
N/A
1,074
--
--
G
19A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,905
G
19B
SEWER
8
1,167
--
--
H
20A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
612
H
20B
SEWER
N/A
370
--
--
H
21A
SEWER
--
--
2, 095
2, 067
H
21B
SEWER
636
598
--
--
H
22A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
270
H
22B
SEWER
N/A
666
--
--
I
23A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
3,335
I
23B
SEWER
N/A
793
--
--
I
24A
SEWER
--
--
I N/A
10,472
I
24B
SEWER
--
240
1 --
--
TOTAL
2,153
6, 823
1 29, 065
45, 110
OVERALL IMPACT Hu4ol-i -J. Cilleece aancl Associates KALAS FALLS 8UBr->IVI81ON
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B U Si n e s S<--. L I # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
SUMMARY 875 Walr@ut Street Suite 360 Cary, NC PI'ione= C919>469 -110l I DATE: 09/28/17 1 HR Z SCALE: NONE OS

LEGEND:
ZONE 1 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
227.-n
BESTY SCARBORO GARDNER
ZONING: R-30
D.B. 3599, PG. 618
LOT 8 B.M. 1947, PG. 78
PIN NO. 1767.01-26-4441
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
WETLAND AND STREAM
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
STREAM WETLAND
STREAM WETLAND OPEN WATER
(LF) (SF) (AC.)
(LF) (SF) (AC.) (SF)
(AC.)
1
ROADWAY
-- -- --
-- -- -- 9,922
0.23
TOTAL
-- -- --
-- -- -- 9,922
0.23
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
BUFFER
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE i
ZONE 2
ZONE i
ZONE 2
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
2
ROADWAY
--
--
8,367
4,819
3
ROADWAY
--
--
727
2,241
4
STORMWATER
OUTFALL
--
--
--
376
TOTAL
--
--
9, 094
7, 436
AREA 1 HIJ4olI KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION BUS 1 ii @ S S L 1 C . # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 8-7s wanusreese 36c"C::: Phone[phone]lt tt uit0 avy, N= C9�0)9-7707 DATE: 09/2B/i7 HRZ SCALE: 1'=50' A

3'H. BERM
000 0 0
0p I
0 00 0 00
0000 0000°
00000000
0000 0000
IX �I
FTEMP. EL
BERM 3 F�. BER
INITIAL STREAM CROSSING
SEQUENCE FOR DUAL 48" RCP CULVERT CROSSING
1. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. WORK OUTSIDE THE FENCED AREA IS IN VIOLATION OF THE NCDENR
PERMIT.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHANNEL CROSSING AND BYPASS CHANNEL. SEE
DETAIL.
3. UNDERCUT THE PROPOSED CULVERT AREA TO FIRM MATERIAL AS DIRECTED
BY GEOTECH. UNDERCUT AREA OF ROADWAY FILL WEST OF CULVERT
CONCURRENTLY. INSTALL DUAL 48" PIPE AS PER PLAN.
4. INSTALL ENDWALLS AND BACKFILL THE PIPE AS PER NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS. ENDWALLS SHALL BE NCDOT DETAIL 838.01.
5. REMOVE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND UNDERCUT ROADWAY FILL
AREA EAST OF THE CULVERT CROSSING AS NEEDED.
6. GRADE THE SLOPES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SILT FENCE SHALL BE
INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND A SECOND ROW AT 7' VERTICAL
HEIGHT. INSTALL MATTING BETWEEN SILT FENCE ROWS. PROVIDE SILT FENCE
OUTLETS AT 150' MAXIMUM SPACING. STAGGER SILT FENCE OUTLETS 25'
WHERE NECESSARY.
7. STABILIZE THE SLOPES AS PER THE PLANS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER
CONSTRUCTION.
8. PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON TOP OF FILL SLOPE UNTIL ROADWAY DRAINAGE IS
INSTALLED.
X SILT FENCE
x
x
I
x
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
1' F
I
SILT FENCE�x
x
x
I
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL
SECTION
I \--FINAL GRADE I
1375
.61M
01
r EXISTING GRADE
UNSTALL 48"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
385
380
375
370
365
360
3
380
375
370
365
360
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
385
380
SIL
385
375 375
3
370 70
a.
go. ag
365 365
CLASS B RIPR
THICK, 6" DIA
14' LONG
360 360
----DUAL 48" RCP
FENCE
2-3+00 --(3-
-----------
i
22+48.97
X
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "=20'
0 20 40 60
ro
cV
to+
0
m z
U O
Q
(n
N
DOWNSTREAM
i
I
3'H. BERM
000 0 0
0p I
0 00 0 00
0000 0000°
00000000
0000 0000
IX �I
FTEMP. EL
BERM 3 F�. BER
INITIAL STREAM CROSSING
SEQUENCE FOR DUAL 48" RCP CULVERT CROSSING
1. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. WORK OUTSIDE THE FENCED AREA IS IN VIOLATION OF THE NCDENR
PERMIT.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHANNEL CROSSING AND BYPASS CHANNEL. SEE
DETAIL.
3. UNDERCUT THE PROPOSED CULVERT AREA TO FIRM MATERIAL AS DIRECTED
BY GEOTECH. UNDERCUT AREA OF ROADWAY FILL WEST OF CULVERT
CONCURRENTLY. INSTALL DUAL 48" PIPE AS PER PLAN.
4. INSTALL ENDWALLS AND BACKFILL THE PIPE AS PER NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS. ENDWALLS SHALL BE NCDOT DETAIL 838.01.
5. REMOVE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND UNDERCUT ROADWAY FILL
AREA EAST OF THE CULVERT CROSSING AS NEEDED.
6. GRADE THE SLOPES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SILT FENCE SHALL BE
INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND A SECOND ROW AT 7' VERTICAL
HEIGHT. INSTALL MATTING BETWEEN SILT FENCE ROWS. PROVIDE SILT FENCE
OUTLETS AT 150' MAXIMUM SPACING. STAGGER SILT FENCE OUTLETS 25'
WHERE NECESSARY.
7. STABILIZE THE SLOPES AS PER THE PLANS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER
CONSTRUCTION.
8. PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON TOP OF FILL SLOPE UNTIL ROADWAY DRAINAGE IS
INSTALLED.
X SILT FENCE
x
x
I
x
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
1' F
I
SILT FENCE�x
x
x
I
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL
SECTION
I \--FINAL GRADE I
1375
.61M
01
r EXISTING GRADE
UNSTALL 48"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
385
380
375
370
365
360
3
380
375
370
365
360
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
385
380
SIL
385
375 375
3
370 70
a.
go. ag
365 365
CLASS B RIPR
THICK, 6" DIA
14' LONG
360 360
----DUAL 48" RCP
FENCE
2-3+00 --(3-
-----------
i
22+48.97
X
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "=20'
0 20 40 60
ro
cV
to+
0
m z
U O
Q
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40
00 O
't't
0i ffi
0+50
0+60
PIPE PROFILE
385
:•
375
370
365
360
010101m.1m.
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
Y
U
0
Z
0
w
Q
(n
N
DOWNSTREAM
J0
U
W
CULVERT
Of
0+00
SECTION
J
I3:
O ZOO
J
In J
A
o ZQ
�/ �
vJ
+zoo
000
W0
'q-
06
C)
0
0�Q
�o
J
O
Quo
Zoo
<
Q
Q
J
LLC)
o
�
C)
00
�C
1..�
U)
Q
0
U
Z 000
W
z
Q
J
0
44.23LF ® 0.9 % SLOPE 48" RCP III
27LF ®0.99% SLOPE 48" RCP III
33.36 LF ® 0.99% SLOPE 48" RCP III
W
W
Z
Sewer Network T ble
EAST PIPE - 104.59'
8" RCP @1% SLOPE
3 383.81 389.71 369.1
2 1383.81 4
369.71
9.44
P 24"
STONE,Sewer
EAST PIPE HAS NC
CATCH BASINS
NAME DN STRUCTURE UP STRUCTURE DOWN INVERT
P3 2 3 369.44
P7 1 2 369.00
Network Table
UP INVERT(FT) LENGTH FT SLOPE R MATERIAL ISHAPE ISIZE IN
369.71 27.00 1.000 INCP III Circular 48.0
369.44 44.23 0.995 RCP III Circular 148.0
WIDTH IN MANNING'S N
0.0 0.0130
10.0 10.0130
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40
00 O
't't
0i ffi
0+50
0+60
PIPE PROFILE
385
:•
375
370
365
360
010101m.1m.
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
Y
U
0
Z
0
w
Q
0(.0
DOWNSTREAM
or-
rnr-
W
CULVERT
LL
0+00
SECTION
J
NTS
0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40
00 O
't't
0i ffi
0+50
0+60
PIPE PROFILE
385
:•
375
370
365
360
010101m.1m.
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
Y
U
0
Z
0
w
Q
J
W
LL
J
0
J
Q
0.
�/ �
vJ
z
W0
06
C)
0
Q
J
O
U
Z
<
Q
Q
J
LLC)
o
�
C)
z
1..�
U)
Q
0
W
z
Q
J
0
>
W
W
Z
U)Q
W�
J
J
0
PRELIMINARY NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
W
J
W
LL
J
0
J
Q
0.
�/ �
vJ
z
W0
06
C)
J
Q
J
O
U
Z
<
Q
Q
J
LLC)
o
�
C)
z
1..�
U)
Q
W
z
Q
J
0
>
W
W
U)Q
W�
J
J
0
U
�
o r- JOB # 9900.50
00 � DSN CHK BY: DS
0+70 0+80 0+90 1+00 1+10 1+20 DWN BY: BH
DATE: 7/10/2017
HRZ SCALE: 1"=20'
VRT SCALE: NONE
SHEET NO.
G4A

\ �1
I
I
I
I
I
355 I
WET POND
BMP#4
My//
IMPACT 6E
WETLAND- TEMP.
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
142 SF (0.003 AC.)
Owl
IMPACT 6D
WETLAND- PERM.
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION
259 SF (0.006 AC.)
l �
� l
IMPACT 6C
STREAM- TEMP.
CULVERT INSTALLATION
5 LF
48 SF
IMPACT 6B
STREAM- PERM.
RIP -RAP- NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS
14 LF
127 SF
IMPACT 6A
STREAM- PERM.
ROADWAY/CULVERT
78 LF
648 SF
IMPACT 6F
STREAM- TEMP.
CULVERT INSTALLATION
15 LF
109 SF (0.003 AC.)
LEGEND:
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (PERMANENT)
LlWETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT RIP -RAP)
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
WETLAND AND STREAM
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
STREAM
WETLAND
STREAM
WETLAND
(LF)
(SF)
(AC.)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC.)
6A
ROADWAY/
CULVERT
--
--
--
78
648
--
--
6B
RIP RAP
--
--
--
14
127
--
--
6C
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
5
48
0.000
--
--
--
--
6D
ROADWAY
--
--
--
--
--
259
0.006
6E
ROADWAY
--
142
0.003
--
--
--
--
6F
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
15
109
0.002
--
--
--
--
TOTAL
20
299
0.005
92
775
259
0.01
AREA 2 HU4oI'1 -J. 811c1 ASSO4-_-18teS KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B U s l n e S S L --i<--. # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 875 Walnut Street Suite 360 Cary, NC Prone= [phone] DATE: 09/28/17 HRZ SCALE: 1'=50' B

WET POND /
o
346
34 348
I 3S4 \
IMPACT 9
BUFFER- PERM.
BMP OUTFALL
ZONE 1- 37
ME
0
IMPACT 7
BUFFER- PERM.
ROADWAY
ZONE 1- 5,344
ZONE 2- 3.393
BUFFER- PERM.
BMP OUTFALL
ZONE 1- 513
ZONE 2- 1,484
I
WET POND 10
IMPACT 5
BUFFER IMPACT- PERM.
STORMWATER OUTFALL
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 285 SF
LEGEND:
ZONE 1 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
BUFFER
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
5
STORMWATER
OUTFALL
--
--
--
285
7
ROADWAY
--
--
5, 344
3, 393
8
BMP/
OUTFALL
--
--
513
1,484
9
BMP/
OUTFALL
--
--
37
1,911
TOTAL
--
--
5, 894
7, 073
AREA 2 HU4oI'1 -J. 8n< -_J ASSOG18t@S KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B u S 1 n e S S L --i<--. # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 875 Walnut Street Suite 0450 Cary, NC Prone= [phone] DATE: 09/2B/17 I HRZ SCALE: 1'=50' C

`360
ass
C■I w Iim%�
TE A P. �H A N N FAL
77L I/
INITIAL STREAM CROSSING
SEQUENCE FOR 60" AND 54"RCP CULVERT CROSSING
1. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. WORK OUTSIDE THE FENCED AREA IS IN VIOLATION OF THE NCDENR
PERMIT.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHANNEL CROSSING AND BYPASS CHANNEL. SEE
DETAIL.
3. UNDERCUT THE PROPOSED CULVERT AREA TO FIRM MATERIAL AS DIRECTED
BY GEOTECH. UNDERCUT AREA OF ROADWAY FILL WEST OF CULVERT
CONCURRENTLY. INSTALL 60" AND 54" PIPE AS PER PLAN.
4. INSTALL ENDWALLS AND BACKFILL THE PIPE AS PER NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS. ENDWALLS SHALL BE NCDOT DETAIL 838.28 (USE 60"
DETAIL).
5. REMOVE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND UNDERCUT ROADWAY FILL
AREA EAST OF THE CULVERT CROSSING.
6. GRADE THE SLOPES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SILT FENCE SHALL BE
INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND A SECOND ROW AT 7' VERTICAL
HEIGHT. INSTALL MATTING BETWEEN SILT FENCE ROWS. PROVIDE SILT FENCE
OUTLETS AT 150' MAXIMUM SPACING. STAGGER SILT FENCE OUTLETS 25'
WHERE NECESSARY.
7. STABILIZE THE SLOPES AS PER THE PLANS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER
CONSTRUCTION.
8. PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON TOP OF FILL SLOPE AND DIVERT WATER TO TST#4
AND 6 UNTIL ROADWAY DRAINAGE IS INSTALLED.
365
360
355
350
345
340
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
I
xT SILT FENCE
x
x
x
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
1' F�
6' + /- -1- 5' -1- 6' + /-
I
SILT FENCE--,'
x
x
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL SECTION
365
360
355
350
345
340
365
360
355
350
345
XISTING GRADE
L -j
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
340 340
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
SECTION
365
360
355
350
345
NTS
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "=20'
0 20 40 60
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
365
C/L
C/L
STA.
ROADWAY
CULVERT
25+25
FINAL GRADE
XISTING GRADE
J
INSTALL 60"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
I
xT SILT FENCE
x
x
x
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
1' F�
6' + /- -1- 5' -1- 6' + /-
I
SILT FENCE--,'
x
x
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL SECTION
365
360
355
350
345
340
365
360
355
350
345
XISTING GRADE
L -j
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
340 340
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
SECTION
365
360
355
350
345
NTS
GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "=20'
0 20 40 60
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
365
w
L
J
J
J
0
365
J
>
a
Q
U)
z
LL]
o
dS
J
Q
Z
J
J
Q
�_
U
0
�
J
O
�
C)
M
0
Z
U
J
Z
Z
Q
J�
O
U
>
W
W
W
cn
Q
360
W
U
�
C
L ROADWAY
360
U
zo
�
C
L CULVERT
�
� �
ST
25+25
~o
�=
Z O
o
U
W �
Z
Z a 3:1 SLOPE
3:1 SLOPE
O o
U
355
ELEV. 352.9
355
O �
U
PROFILE
ATC/L
350
350
00
(LT)
24"
IN. 78' —
60" RCP CL
III ©0.25
78 —
54 RCP CL
345
RT
TCCILAAS�
4+86 Invert
345.8 LT (12"
BURY) 60'
RCP
Sta.
345
346.0 LT (12"
BURY)
4+86 Invert
346.8 RT (LOOKING
UPSTREAM)
54"
CP
Sta.
25+64 Invert
347.0 RT
B RIPRAP 2
8" PVC
THICK,
6" DIA STONE,
14' LO
G
340
340
Iq M
q 00
00 ori
0) 0)
M M
M M
24+70
24+80 24+90
25+00 25+10
25+20 25+30
25+40
25+50 25+60
25+70 25+80
Horizontal Scale = 1 :10
Vertical Scale = 1 :5
PIPE PROFILE
Z
0
U)
W
m
a
0
6
Z
[/7 1 FA R/ FA/ F 7 1
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
F/I F/J/ [7/1 FA/ R/
PRELIMINARY NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
W
J
w
L
J
J
J
0
J
>
a
Q
U)
z
LL]
o
dS
J
Q
Z
J
J
Q
�_
U
0
�
J
O
�
C)
M
0
Z
U
J
Z
Z
Q
J�
O
U
>
W
W
W
cn
Q
W
U
�
C
L ROADWAY
0
U
zo
�
C
L CULVERT
�
� �
ST
25+25
~o
�=
Z O
o
U
W �
Z
Z a 3:1 SLOPE
3:1 SLOPE
O o
U
100 YR
ELEV. 352.9
O �
U
PROFILE
ATC/L
LT PIPE
(LT)
24"
IN. 78' —
60" RCP CL
III ©0.25
78 —
54 RCP CL
III ©0.25%
RT
TCCILAAS�
4+86 Invert
345.8 LT (12"
BURY) 60'
RCP
Sta.
25+64 Invert
346.0 LT (12"
BURY)
4+86 Invert
346.8 RT (LOOKING
UPSTREAM)
54"
CP
Sta.
25+64 Invert
347.0 RT
B RIPRAP 2
8" PVC
THICK,
6" DIA STONE,
14' LO
G
Z
0
U)
W
m
a
0
6
Z
[/7 1 FA R/ FA/ F 7 1
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
F/I F/J/ [7/1 FA/ R/
PRELIMINARY NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
W
J
JOB # 9900.50
DSN CHK BY: DS
DWN BY: BH
DATE: 7/10/2017
HRZ SCALE: 1"=20'
VRT SCALE: NONE
SHEET NO.
G5A
w
L
J
0
J
>
a
U)
z
LL]
o
dS
J
Q
Z
J
J
Q
�_
U
a
�
�
J
n
O
�
C)
M
0
Z
U
J
LLI
Z
J�
O
U
>
Lil
W
cn
Q
W
J
J
0
U
�
JOB # 9900.50
DSN CHK BY: DS
DWN BY: BH
DATE: 7/10/2017
HRZ SCALE: 1"=20'
VRT SCALE: NONE
SHEET NO.
G5A

IMPACTI II�IIIIIIIIIII °��
STREAM- TEMP.
CULVERT
5 LF
il SF
1
IMPACT 10B
STREAM- PERM.
RIP -RAP- NO FUNCTIONAL LOSS
28 LF
307 SF
LEGEND:
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (PERMANENT)
\ 1 WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT RIP -RAP)
/ \ 3Srrrr.02 WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
\ \ 14
=•�MINOR
'��
-I
i
�- IOD
TEMP.EM
Ir INSTALLATION
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
WETLAND AND STREAM
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
STREAM
WETLAND
STREAM
WETLAND
(LF)
(SF)
(AC.)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(AC.)
10A
ROADWAY/
CULVERT
--
--
--
119
999
--
--
10B
RIP RAP
--
--
--
28
307
--
--
10C
CULVERT
INSTALLATION
5
81
0.000
--
--
--
--
IOD
ROADWAY
10
132
0.003
--
--
--
--
TOTAL
15
299
0.003
t 147
1,306
--
AREA 3 HI 4ol-i -J. KALAS PALLS SUf3r_>IVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION BUS 11'1 @ S S L 1 C . # C - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 8-7s walnut street suite 36o cavy, Nc Phone= C9�9)469-7707 DATE: 09/8/17 HRZ SCALE: 1"=50' D

LEGEND:
1� 1
321 \\\ ALL Ali R� 1 II ��
1 I\ I \ , ZONE 1 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
m
� I \ I \� I i/ ZONE 2 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
m
BIMPACT
UFFER-1PERM. \ I �\ \ I \ P
ROADWAYZONE 1- 4 039
\\\ J
ZONE 2- 2, 612 \\ � \ ✓ \� \i\
14
WET POND
19
EM 01;
r....r...
R. ,..
0.10..
'
TEMPORARY
a..56%SIJ
I ,
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ME
101 lI mom
l
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
1400 PC
11
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 059
��p►.�MEN
iML
u►1010
olp 12 'A olp 5012
12
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 039
%D.%%iii'
,►.-�nI.i.Llua'
`_��� -SI%7a%D.►1010
--..%.
__1010 _...-
-
�
% 10M.%101010_.
BMP/
OUTFALL
m �
■ ■
--
96
'
--
--
8, 098
5,364
.
.•-STORMWATER
IMPACT
BUFFER- PERM.
OUTFALL
kmmr,�MZONE
2- 96
`per\ \♦�\ � '\
PROPOSED GREENWAY
AND SANITARY SEWER
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
BUFFER
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
11
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 059
2, 656
12
ROADWAY
--
--
4, 039
2, 612
13
BMP/
OUTFALL
--
--
--
96
TOTAL
--
--
8, 098
5,364
AREA 3 HI 4ol-i -J. KALAS FALLS 8UBr->IVI810N
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION BUS 1 m @ S S L 1 C . # c — 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 8-7s walnut street suite 36O cavy, Nc Phone= (9l9)469-7707 DATE: 09/28/17 1 HRZ SCALE: 1"=50' E

•
• •
• •.
.... L
•-----
• o •
00 6
a
3' H _ B Et M
NITIAL STREAM CROSSING
SEQUENCE FOR 84" RCP CULVERT CROSSING
1. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. WORK OUTSIDE THE FENCED AREA IS IN VIOLATION OF THE NCDENR
PERMIT.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CHANNEL CROSSING AND BYPASS CHANNEL. SEE
DETAIL.
3. UNDERCUT THE PROPOSED CULVERT AREA TO FIRM MATERIAL AS DIRECTED
BY GEOTECH. UNDERCUT AREA OF ROADWAY FILL WEST OF CULVERT
CONCURRENTLY. INSTALL 84" PIPE AS PER PLAN.
4. INSTALL ENDWALLS AND BACKFILL THE PIPE AS PER NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS. ENDWALLS SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE OR PRECAST.
CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY SEALED DRAWINGS OF ENDWALL DESIGN.
5. REMOVE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND UNDERCUT ROADWAY FILL
AREA EAST OF THE CULVERT CROSSING.
6. GRADE THE SLOPES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SILT FENCE SHALL BE
INSTALLED AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE AND A SECOND ROW AT 8' VERTICAL
HEIGHT. INSTALL MATTING BETWEEN SILT FENCE ROWS. PROVIDE SILT FENCE
OUTLETS AT 150' MAXIMUM SPACING. STAGGER SILT FENCE OUTLETS 25'
WHERE NECESSARY.
7. STABILIZE THE SLOPES AS PER THE PLANS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER
CONSTRUCTION.
8. PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON TOP OF FILL SLOPE AND DIVERT WATER TO TST#9
UNTIL ROADWAY DRAINAGE IS INSTALLED.
.;a' ,z' z -.z' •z - •z- •z• •a •z ••z •z : z .z' .z' •z- .z•' .' .c' ••z
345
340
335
'H. B R
I
xT SILT FENCE
x
I
x
x
6' + /-
5'
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
6' + /-
I
SILT FENCETx
x
I
x
I
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL SECTION
C/L ROADWAY
C/L CULVERT
STA. 0+70
FINAL GRADE
XI SITING
GRADE
INSTALL 84"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
325
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
35
350
345
340
335
SITING GRADE
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
355
350
345
340
335
,30
325 1 1 325
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
DUA
S I LI
_�U
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
355
W
I'�
L.L
J
C/L ROADWAY
0
J
A.
>
a
355
U
z
C/L CULVERT
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
i•
a`. i• n`. �• a`.
Q
~
STA. 0+70
Q
,•4,a`. ,
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
a�•
a�• a�• a�• a�• i', i'
• � a`
! ��•! ate•! ate• � ate•! ate• i
.' e' e'
. .
.
a
.
.
W
LU
2:1 SLOPE
717
�
�
�
W
•i •z •z
- •-z •z •z •z '•z •z •z• •a
•-z •z
BAFFLE 1.5' HIGH
a, a,
END
HALF PIPE WIDTH
0
6 HIGH FULL PIPE
�
345
340
335
'H. B R
I
xT SILT FENCE
x
I
x
x
6' + /-
5'
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
6' + /-
I
SILT FENCETx
x
I
x
I
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL SECTION
C/L ROADWAY
C/L CULVERT
STA. 0+70
FINAL GRADE
XI SITING
GRADE
INSTALL 84"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
325
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
35
350
345
340
335
SITING GRADE
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
355
350
345
340
335
,30
325 1 1 325
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
DUA
S I LI
_�U
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
355
W
I'�
L.L
J
C/L ROADWAY
0
J
>
a
355
U
z
C/L CULVERT
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
i•
a`. i• n`. �• a`.
Q
~
STA. 0+70
Q
,•4,a`. ,
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
a�•
a�• a�• a�• a�• i', i'
>
z
. .
.' e' e'
. .
O
U
>
W
LU
2:1 SLOPE
717
a
�
W
J
BAFFLE 1.5' HIGH
8' FROM
END
HALF PIPE WIDTH
0
6 HIGH FULL PIPE
�
STAGGER LT / RT
61
® 8' SPACING
----------------------"----
d
z
350
cS Q
350
cS Q
00
z 4'`z rt `z 1`
1 z 1•z 'l -`z h`z .4'`z rt `z 1`
4:z
4
'a:4`.
�T
!a.4-. ,.'4`. e.h `. e.4 `. ,rt `. i.4, `. Q.q,` a. ,•`: a.1'� a.1-. ,.
PIPE WIDTH
AT
END
BAFFLE 1' HIGH
BY 1' WIDE
© OUTLET
345
340
335
'H. B R
I
xT SILT FENCE
x
I
x
x
6' + /-
5'
EXCELSIOR
BLANKET
2'
6' + /-
I
SILT FENCETx
x
I
x
I
x
TEMPORARY CHANNEL SECTION
C/L ROADWAY
C/L CULVERT
STA. 0+70
FINAL GRADE
XI SITING
GRADE
INSTALL 84"RCP 12" BELOW
EX. STREAM BED ELEV.
325
CENTER
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
355
350
345
340
335
330
325
35
350
345
340
335
SITING GRADE
INSTALL TOP OF RIPRAP TO
MATCH PRECONSTRUCTION
STREAM CONTOUR
355
350
345
340
335
,30
325 1 1 325
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
SECTION
NTS
DUA
S I LI
_�U
FINAL GRADING PLAN CULVERT
355
W
I'�
L.L
J
C/L ROADWAY
0
J
>
a
355
U
z
C/L CULVERT
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
U
_
Q
~
STA. 0+70
Q
Ii
o
� v J
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
Q �
>
z
2:1 SLOPE
O
U
>
W
LU
2:1 SLOPE
Q �
a
�
W
J
J
0
U
�
61
d
z
350
cS Q
350
cS Q
00
�T
100
R ELEV. 341.
BAFFLE 1'
IGH
PROFILE AT
C/L
1' HIGH
1 2 PIPE WIDTH
IPE WIDTH
� 8' SPACINGS
345
E ONLY
345
-
f
f
Sta. 0+10
Invert 330.7
RT (1' BUR
)
Sta. 0+10
Invert 331.7
LT (LOOKING
UPSTREAM
BAFFLES IN
RT PIPE ONLY
St
1+28 Inve
t 331.0 RT
1' BURY
118'
— DUAL 84"
RCP CL III
0.25
St
1+28 Inve
t 332.0 LT
24 Ho
izontal Scale
= 1 :10
TONE, Vertical
Scale
1 : 5
2
340
340
00,
335
335
BAFFLE
FU
FULL
PIP
n
n
n n-
330
°
CLASS I RIPRAP
THICK, 12" DIA
28' LONG
325
325
00 —
— r")
c0
Lnoo
_t PI)
O—
0+00 0+10
0+20 0+30
0+40 0+50
0+60
0+70
0+80
0+90
1+00
1+10
1+20 1+30
1+40
PIPE PROFILE
INN
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
010101010
Y
z
0
w
W
I'�
L.L
J
C/L ROADWAY
0
J
>
a
n
L.L
U
z
C/L CULVERT
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
U
_
Q
~
STA. 0+70
Q
Ii
o
� v J
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
Q �
>
z
2:1 SLOPE
O
U
>
W
LU
2:1 SLOPE
Q �
a
�
W
J
J
0
U
�
61
d
z
cS Q
cS Q
00
�T
100
R ELEV. 341.
BAFFLE 1'
IGH
PROFILE AT
C/L
1' HIGH
1 2 PIPE WIDTH
IPE WIDTH
� 8' SPACINGS
E ONLY
1
-
f
f
Sta. 0+10
Invert 330.7
RT (1' BUR
)
Sta. 0+10
Invert 331.7
LT (LOOKING
UPSTREAM
BAFFLES IN
RT PIPE ONLY
St
1+28 Inve
t 331.0 RT
1' BURY
118'
— DUAL 84"
RCP CL III
0.25
St
1+28 Inve
t 332.0 LT
24 Ho
izontal Scale
= 1 :10
TONE, Vertical
Scale
1 : 5
PIPE PROFILE
INN
Hugh J. Gilleece
and Associates
875 Walnut Street
Suite 360
Cary, NC 27511
BUSINESS LIC. # C-496
Phone: [phone]
010101010
Y
z
0
w
PRELIMINARY NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
W
J
W
I'�
L.L
J
0
J
>
a
n
L.L
U
z
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
U
_
Q
~
~
Q
Ii
o
� v J
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
� W
>
z
O
U
>
W
LU
�
0
a
�
W
J
J
0
U
�
61
d
z
PRELIMINARY NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
W
J
JOB # 9900.50
DSN CHK BY: DS
DWN BY: BH
DATE: 7/10/2017
HRZ SCALE: 1"=201
VRT SCALE: NONE
SHEET NO.
G9A
W
I'�
L.L
J
0
J
>
a
n
L.L
U
z
W
0
06
r� //��
V J
_J
Q
Z
J
J
0
U
_
Q
~
~
nJ
L.L
Ii
o
� v J
0
� �Q
� L.1_
O
z
� W
>
z
O
U
>
W
LU
U)
a
�
W
J
J
0
U
�
JOB # 9900.50
DSN CHK BY: DS
DWN BY: BH
DATE: 7/10/2017
HRZ SCALE: 1"=201
VRT SCALE: NONE
SHEET NO.
G9A

IMPACT 16A
IMPACT 15B BUFFER- PERM.
BUFFER- TEMP. SEWER EASEMENT
EXISTING ASHPALT DRIVEWAY SEWER EASEMENT ZONE 1- N/A�
ZONE I- ZONE 2- 932 ZONE 2- 155
� I I
�I N
I I \
I �I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
�CR0N8TR50 cn0 T / l I /// ��►�-.
IMPACT 146 / \ EASEMENT z /—.::.:::..:..:..:::::::::::::::::: • _ _�_ — ` \
BUFFER- TEMP. "
SEWER EASEMENT
..........
1 ZONE 1- 790
1 �
ZONE 2- 275
s � �
`��� ` 'PRO SED 30' COR
//,-—� j 'PU ILITY EASEMENTEL
r�
IMPAC 15A PROPOSED 5'
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
BUFFER- PERM.
/ SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A ROBERT BALLANCE
PROPOSED 30' ZONE 2- 1,208 ROBIN M. BALLANCE
-- / COR UTILITY a ZONING: R-30
0D
EASEMENT D.B. 13321 PG. 687
— — /C B.M. 2004, PG. 589
EASEMENTTION PIN NO. 1758901417
IMPACT 14A REAL ESTATE ID: 0188744
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 2,413
/ ZONE 2- 687 I
/ SEWER CROSSING WILL BE
AN AERIAL CROSSING AND
ACCESS WILL BE DONE THROUGH
THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS
WITH NO STREAM IMPACTS
LEGEND:
ZONE
1 IMPACT
(PERMANENT)
BUFFER
ZONE
2 IMPACT
(PERMANENT)
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
IMPACT
IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
NUMBER
SPECIFICATION
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
III=III=11
1=III=III ZONE
1 IMPACT
(TEMPORARY)
14A
SEWER
--
--
2,413
687
III=III-11
14B
SEWER
790
275
--
--
15A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,208
ZONE
2 IMPACT
(TEMPORARY)
15B
SEWER
N/A
932
--
--
16A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
155
TOTAL
790
1, 207
2,413
2, 050
AREA 4 HUC;l-i -J. aancl ASSO4---18teS KALAs FALLS 8UBr->IVI810N
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION Business L i c . # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 20000.05 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 875 wgir,mit str-eet Sete 360 ogr-y, No Prone= 0919 0 4 6 9-17 0 7 D TE:HM9$Qlae71"=60' 1 F

PL�/PL/PL
IMPACT 17A
WETLAND- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT
TEMP- 1.032 SF (0.02 ac.)
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT
/ / C
PROPOSED 5'
/ �G`ON�UGTION EASEMENT'
/
1
PL
-PL PL PL
I FrFNn•
0
p
<lT��p �qS
9SF��cpq �tiT
4'T
IMPACT 17C
BUFFER- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 719
ZONE 2- 708
IMPACT 17B
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 1,471
ZONE 2- 2.663
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
ZONE
.. ;.
ZONE
2 IMPACT
PERM.
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2
EASEMENT
I IMPACT
-- -- 1,032 0.02
•
SEWER
--
--
--
ZONE
00
17B
SEWER
--
--
PL
-PL PL PL
I FrFNn•
0
p
<lT��p �qS
9SF��cpq �tiT
4'T
IMPACT 17C
BUFFER- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 719
ZONE 2- 708
IMPACT 17B
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 1,471
ZONE 2- 2.663
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
ZONE
I IMPACT
ZONE
2 IMPACT
i n �
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2
ZONE
I IMPACT
-- -- 1,032 0.02
17A
SEWER
--
--
--
ZONE
2 IMPACT
PL
(PERMANENT)
(PERMANENT)
(TEMPORARY)
(TEMPORARY)
IMPACT 18B X11
BUFFER- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT �� \
ZONE 1- N/A -Z� I \
ZONE 2- 1,074 \
JONATHAN V. GILLIS �\
ZONING: R-30
D.B. 4974, PG. 38
TRACT 2 B.M. 1987, PG.1527
PIN NO. 1758.04-90-8610
REAL ESTATE ID: 0163469
IMPACT 19A
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 1,905
IMPACT 19B
BUFFER- TEMP.
\ SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 8
\� ZONE 2- 1, 167
NN
SPIKE SET IN
ROCK FORMATION N 89°36'05" W
PL -PL -PL -PL -IL -165. - 0' -PL-
BUFFER
L
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
BUFFER
WETLAND
TEMPORARY PERMANENT
PERMANENT TEMPORARY
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 2
(SF) (AC.) (SF) (AC.)
(SF) (SF) (SF) (SF)
-- -- 1,032 0.02
17A
SEWER
--
--
--
--
-- -- -- --
17B
SEWER
--
--
1,471
2, 663
-- -- -- --
17C
SEWER
719
708
--
--
-- -- -- --
IBA
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,863
-- -- -- --
IBB
SEWER
N/A
1,074
--
--
-- -- -- --
19A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
1,905
-- -- -- --
19B
SEWER
8
1,167
--
--
-- -- -- --
TOTAL
727
2,949
1,471
6, 431
11, 032 0.02
AREA 5 HU4ot-i -J. aLn<A ASSOG18t@S KAI—AS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION
IMPACT MAP Business L i c . # c - 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 20000.05 SHT:
875 WalnutreeSue 60 CNC one
Stt it3ary, Fl -%= 091 00 4 6 9-17 07 DATE: 09/28/17 HRZ SCALE: 1'=60' G

IMPACT 20A
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 612 I
IMPACT 20B \
BUFFER- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT \
ZONE 1- N/A
� \\ ZONE 2- 370 \
IMPACT 21A
BUFFER- PERM.
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- 2,095
�y ZONE 2- 2,067
PROPOSED 3 COR
UTILITY E SEMENT
PR POSED 5'
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
S8 °36' 5"E
204 '
7
-SEWER CROSSING WILL BE AN AERIAL CROSSING`
AND ACCESS WILL BE DONE WITH THE USE OF A
BRIDGE MAT WITH NO STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT 21B
BUFFER- TEMP.
SEWER EASEMENT - -
ZONE 1- 636
ZONE 2- 598
SUrrtN- itMN. JOSEPH E. WALL
\ SEWER EASEMENT BETTY R. GUNZ
\ ZONE 1- N/A ZONING: YR-3ZONE 2- 666 D. B. 5178,
B� 1985, -
NL W. 17frS.03 ss92PL
oox
Ty
STR_�H TE MEN
SE R C.O.
\� --fff�%�
IMPACT 22A
BUFFER- PERM.
LEGEND: SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 270
ZONE 1 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (PERMANENT)
111=111= I
1lllllll
BUFFER
ZONE 1 IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
ZONE 2 IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
(SF) (SF)
(SF) (SF)
20A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
612
20B
SEWER
N/A
370
--
--
21A
SEWER
--
--
2,095
2,067
21B
SEWER
636
598
--
--
22A
SEWER
--
--
N/A
270
22B
SEWER
N/A
666
--
--
TOTAL
727
2, 617
1, 471
6,431
AREA 6 HU4oI'1 -J. aLn<d ASSOC18t@S KAI-AS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B U S I n e S S LIC . # c - 496 OWN BY: — JOB #: 9900.55 SHIT
IMPACT MAP S7s Walnut street suite 360 cavy, NC Phone= [phone] DATE: 09/28/17 HRZ SCALE: 1"=50' H

/
IMPACTS IN THIS AREA HAVE BEEN REFLECTED
- AND ACCOUNTED FOR ON SHT.G
w
mo
N
ru
c cu
ki
wLr' z z
z l
N s PROPOSED 5'
a as CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPOSED 30' COR �?
3 UTILITY EASEMENT
wo THE WATKINS FAMILY, L.L.C.
ZONING: R-30 ZONE 2 IMPACT -
mo) 5931, PG. 93 PERM.- 3,334.79 SF
TRACT 1B UTIL
L■t:C■v��oG■��e.-
.■■siiieuu■rmo--
noun
■■7■�■■■■Ii■■■■■■Ii■����
2F--1all ai■■.--
uh. C7■■
mom
mea B.M. 1925, PG. 52 ITY
z I PIN NO. 1757.02-99-4300
REAL ESTATE ID: 0074674 ZONE 2 IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
ZN
_ � _s •
WETLAID A WETLAND AREA
\ \ w /
N ss
/
w
o / --J/
mo 20' iH, II1111
—1� — N ZN 2 $$ 7F
----
-----
7C
---------------------
IMPACT 24B
BUFFER- TEMP. PROPOSED 30' COR -
SEWER EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 240
7D
---j----------
PROPOSED 5'
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
' –
BUFFER
IMPACT 24A
BUFFER- PERM.
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SEWER EASEMENT
ZONE 1- N/A
ZONE 2- 10,472
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
(SF) (SF)
(SF) (SF)
23A
SEWER
-- --
N/A 3,335
23B
SEWER
-- 793
-- --
24A
SEWER
-- --
N/A 10,472
24B
SEWER
-- 240
-- --
TOTAL
-- 1,033
-- 10, 807
AREA 7 HI 4ot-i -J. 8110 ASSOC18t@S KAI-AS FALLS SUBDIVISION
KALAS FALLS SUBDIVISION B U S I I i @ S S L— I C . # c — 496 OWN BY: - JOB #: 9900.55 SHT:
IMPACT MAP 8-7s walnut street suite 36o cavy, Nc Phone= [phone] DATE: 09/28/17 1 HRZ SCALE: 1"=50'

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
POND DAM REHAB IMPACT EXHIBITS - NWP 3

I Stonegate
I Sys ipJ
at St. U5401' s
Andrews P 4 _• o` I r'-' I a� o
14%
o- i --- &7he Village i Qp
C. i `_� --- US 401 BUS
! _ _ at Rolesville���'
m
' `----- - ---� I------------ - ---' ;»
US 401 `
Highlgnd 7
Creek--!
Preserve US 401
:I I
:I
p
I N
�
` US 401 i i r `•��
\�
4rtt-he11 M I1 Road
0
111
�
540©OpenStreetMap contributors
oya� https://www.openstreetmap.org
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
w
m z
� o
TEMPORARY
a v SIKFAM OPEN WAIER BUFFER
g v ZONE1
(LF) {SFT (AC) (SF) I (AC) (SF) (ACI
A 1 25 1 DAM REHABILITATION
A 1 26 1 DAM REHABILITATION
A 1 2/ 1 DAMREHABIU1A11ON
A 1 28 1 DAM REHABILITATION
3,406 1 0.076
STREAM, OPEN WATER & BUFFER IMPACTS
BUFFER
20NE2
ISFI (AC}
STREAM
{LF} (SF)
62 421
I I I
I Iv
\ ,1111 1�••• \ \ 1—� —�
\
/ /I ••
----� // r
/
---- v
PERMANENT
OPEN WA IER BUFFER BUFFER LONE 2
2ONE1
{AC} (SF) (AC) (SF) (AC) {SF} IACI
0 010
431 1 0.010
3,256 1 0.075
IA 29 DAM REHABILITATION 571 0.013
A 30 DAM RLHABILITATION 1300 1 0-030
A 1 31 1 DAM REHABILITATION
A 1 32 1 DAM REHABILITATION
A I 33 I DAM REHABILITATION
TOTAL
29 1 0.001
7R 1 6.002
436 1 0.010
3,406 1 0.018 46S I 0.011 I 1,300 1 0.030 1 62 1 421 0.010 1 431 1 0.010 1 3,915 1 0.090
\ \ \\ \\\ IMPACT MAP A
1 \ ILL.L
�---'—'--- LU J
5 a�
I1 I Lij
j U
7
I
I GRAPHIC SCALE
500
r I ( 0 250 50
E
LL
LJ_ L
W Z
LL O
LL
m Q
p� U
O
LU
cn Ll_I
O

E
IN
LEGEND
EXISTING POND
\` STREAM IMPACT -PERMANENT
(LINEAR) o
\ \ 1
17771
OPEN WATER IMPACT PERMANENT C o
v��
N a
0
1 E/XISTWI S\ TIAEAM / / `�x\;' '' / / / OPEN WATER IMPACT TEMPORARY roM
IN BUFFER IMPACT - PERMANENT N
\ I
IMPACT 29 / p`y`
17179
(ZONE 1) s
1 \
E NO,/ \ %\ / I
PERMANENT 1 BUFFER IMPACT % PACT TEMPORARY
— 1r /I BUFFER IM
-------------- \ \\ \\ I I
WE a Ds (GRADING FOR DISSIPATOR) (ZONE 1) `` a
\ Ali" \1/) j I 571 SF (0.013 ACRES) I py`IWJF
\ \ \ IMPACT 25 I I �\ I \ BUFFER IMPACT - PERMANENT
TOE OF SLOPE OF EXISTING DAM \\ PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
(ZONE
___ (EXISTING EMBANKMENT AND \\ (GRADING FOR DISSIPATOR) \, ;
I I (z 2)
AUXILIARY SPILLWAY) 62 LF, 421 SF (0.010 ACRES) t— 11\, I I y I py` I BUFFER IMPACT - TEMPORARY
W\\
(ZONE 2)
-�'_
__ — -_- TEMPORARY DIVERSION SWALE
r\-------
\\' ----- , `" 4 IMPACT30 w Q
TEMPORARY ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT L
(GRADING FOR ACCESS & EROSION CONTROL) m
1,300 SF (0.030 ACRES) °� U
/ \ - --- f - — >\ / \ < Q
ream
f IMPACT 31 - w
,
1 \ - ------------r ----------- ---------- _
' TEMPORARY ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT
U)
i r\, (GRADING FOR ACCESS & EROSION CONTROL)
1V__ 29 SF (0.001 ACRES)
_ ; o
4--
IMPACT 32 _
PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT ------------ Z75
I i �/ =3�0 - `\ (GRADING FOR EMBANKMENT) -
------ --- --- s
- -----
\ 78 S 002 ACRE �n
IMP CT33IIi
----
FO IMPACTLL Fn
------ (GRADING ORROS ON CONTROL) _- ------
J
`__
436 SF (0.010 ACRES) w
------ - ------ Q
) IMPACT 27 �� _-
--a-------- ,� ------------------------ o
\', \ PERMANENT OPEN WATER IMPACT � - — — _ _ _ — Q
------- `� (GRADING FOR EMBANKMENT) w — — — — — — —
IMPACT 28 \'` _ _ \ 431 SF (0.010 ACRES)
PERMANENT ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT z o
(GRADING FOR AUXILIARY SPILLWAY) - -�� IMPACT 26 \\ ' `-- ------
--
--------
3,266 SF (0.075 ACRES) `� \'`,'`, _ TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT \ �;., -----------
--------
---- N m m a LL
GRADING FOR COFFERDAM AND
EROSION CONTROL) \ \ -' _ ----------------
3
406
---------- ---
3406 SF (0.078 ACRES)
/----------------
\A
_
EXISTING OPEN WATER
�' -----
-------------
-----------------
o ------
--------- GRAPHIC SCALE >m