20171529 Ver 1_Draft IP Application_20171127

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 10:27 AM
To: Burdette, Jennifer a
Subject: [External] Secure File Transfer
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
report. [e-mail].
Sender: [e-mail]
Upload Date: 2017-11-27 09:26:39.0
Message: Good morning,
Timmons is pleased to present the DRAFT IP application for the Person County Mega -Site. Please note that the attached IP application is only
a draft and is not intended for public notice.
Click the following link to download your file(s).
Click to Retrieve Files)
PERSON COUNTY DRAFT IP APP 11-22-17 - Copy.pdf
If the above link is not clickable, copy and paste the following URL into your browser.
https://www.sendthisfile.com/23r95uKVSDGVdijZOBSZQSgB
Note: These files will expire in 14 days from the time this email was generated.

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE
DRAFT INDI VID UAL PERMIT REQUEST
FOR AGENCY REVIEW ONLY
PREPARED FOR: lqm
PERSON COUNTY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC.
ATTN: MR. DAVID NEWELL & MR. STUART GILBERT
NOVEMBER 2017
2
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
1of13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting this
Individual Permit Request for the development of the Person County Mega -Site (Project). The proposed project
is situated on approximately 1,456 acres and is located approximately 5 miles north of Roxboro in Person
County, North Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). The site is comprised of both wooded and agricultural
fields. Land use surrounding the site is predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed
with agricultural fields and single family residential homes. Access to the site is via Country Club Road or
Edwin Robertson Road.
The overall purpose of the proposed project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park and
associated infrastructure (Le road improvements, stormwater, utilities, parking etc.). The proposed business
park will accommodate a stand-alone semiconductor fabrication chip plant (commonly called a fab; sometimes
foundry) that produces devices such as integrated circuits. In addi ' n, the proposed business and industrial
park has been designed to accommodate additional manufacturing Rcilities that produce materials/products
to support the main industry as well as research and development facilities also required to support the
semiconductor fabrication chip plant.
The proposed Person County Business and Industrial site layout is comprised of 25 buildings including the 1
million square foot central operations facility and associated support facilities totaling approximately 320
acres (13,939,200 square feet) total. The site is suitable for the proposed development based on specific
industry requirements including, but not limited to, a minimum of 200 acres with compatible zoning, access to
available and high quality electricity (3 MGD during initial phases), experienced workforce, and direct routes
to interstates.
N
It is rare that a sin�sitemeets all the criteria %necetk'for the successful development of a semiconductor
fabrication chip plant. Power requirements for a semiconductor fabrication chip plant are significant. The
existing availability of power sets the Person County Site apart from alternative locations, not only in North
Carolina, but also globally. Currently the site is served by a 2,350 Megawatt Steam Plant, a 729 Megawatt
Steam Plant, a 49 Megawatt Combined Cycle Plant and 230 KV lines and 115 KV lines that cross the site. The
amount and quality of available power in addition to the amount of available water, wastewater, natural gas
and telecom further sets this site apart. The Person County Site was determined to be the most suitable option
based on the size and currently available infrastructure (i.e. electrical, natural gas, water and sewer).
Therefore, Person County has identified the proposed site as an economic development priority and has
invested significant resources into the planning and due -diligence required to develop the Site. Based on an
Economic Impact Study completed by N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the ongoing, annual
employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County area
including 4,000 direct company jobs and an additional 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and induced
effects.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
2of13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Based on the 2010 U.S. Census, the median household income for families living in the County was $54,474 and
the per capita income for the county was $22,189. In Person County, about 9.4% of families and 12% of the
population are below the poverty line. The N.C. Department of Commerce annually ranks the state's 100
counties based on economic well-being and assigns each a tier designation. These designations are based on
the average unemployment rate, median household income, percentage growth in population, and adjusted
property tax base per capita. The 40 most distressed counties are designated as Tier 1, the next 40 as Tier 2,
and the least 20 least distressed as Tier 3. Person County is currently ranked as a Tier 1 county.
The County has incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the
development needs and patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract. The County has completed the
environmental and utility infrastructure studies necessary to attract industrial users, in order to facilitate an
expedient approval process. The site is currently zoned RC -Rural Conservation and the proposed use is
consistent with the current zoning and is considered a permitted use. V%
Primary constraints when looking at the on-site alternatives were ultimately reduced to impacts to Waters of
the U.S., topographic constraints and available access. The selected alternative, the LEDPA was determined to
meet the size requirements of the proposed facility, resulted in the least amount of impacts to Waters of the
U.S. and provided for access to the site as w as connectivity of the main operations facility to the other
support facilities required for the site.
In order to accomplish the goals of the Project, at total of 9.1 acres of unavoidable permanent impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and 46,959 linear feet of stream are required. These unavoidable impacts will be
mitigated through the purchase of compensatory wetland and stream credits through the N.0 Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS). The purchase of this compensatory mitigation will ensure the unavoidable impacts
proposed by the Project, will result in a "no net loss" of aquatic resource function and value to Waters of the
U.S.
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable throughout
the planning Ad design process. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the
approximately 1 million square foot central operations facility as well as position the facility along the existing
ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order streams or higher quality streams on the site. In
addition, the proposed support facilities have been designed and strategically located in interstream divides in
order to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands in those areas.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
3of13

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
PERSON COUNTY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. - PERSON COUNTY
MEGA -SITE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT REQUEST
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET................................................................................................................................................5
2.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................................7
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................................................................8
3.1 Site Location...................................................................................................................................................................................8
Am
3.2 Site Condition................................................................................................................................................................................8
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED.......................................................................................................................................................................9
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................................10
6.0 JURISDICTIONAL IMPACTS........................................................................................................................................................11
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION..........................................................................................................................................12
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION................................................................................................................................................12
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION.........................................................................................................................................12
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information......................................................................................................12
9.2 Cultural Resources...................................................................................................................................................................13
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Parcel Map 'i
Figure 3 Environmental Inventory Map
Figure 4 FEMA Floodplain
Figure 5 Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S Overall
APPENDICES
Appendix A Joint Permit Application
Appendix B Wetland Delineation Information
Appendix C Scoping Letters and Agency Response
Appendix D Zoning Information
Appendix E NCDOC Economic Impact Study
Appendix F Selection Criteria Matrix & On -Site Alternatives Evaluated
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
4of13

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Appendix G Waters of the U.S. Impact Maps
1.0 PRJOECT INFORMATION SHEET
General
Project Name:
State:
Location:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Subject Property Size
HUC Code:
Waterbodies on Property
Corresponding
Information
USGS Quad:
County:
Applicant
Name:
Address:
Contact:
Telephone:
5410 Trinity Road
Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Person County Mega -Site
North Carolina
Person County
36.4779
-78.9941
1456 Acres
030101(
Story's C
1k
)live Hil
'erson CUU11Ly
X **
Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc.
PO Box 1824
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Mr. Stuart Gilbert
C: 336-504-3079
P 919.859.5663
www.timmons.com
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
5of13

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Email:
Agent
Name:
Address:
Contact:
Telephone:
Email:
[e-mail]
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Mrs. Anna Reusche, PWS
0: 919-866-4500 C: 919-816-7745
[e-mail]
Anticipated Permit Authorizations
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Individual Permit
• North Carolina Division of Water Resources: 401 General Water Quality Certification
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan & Grading Permit
• Site Plan F
• NCDCIT Er
• Duke Site
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
6of13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc. (Applicant), Timmons Group is submitting
this permit request for the Person County Mega -Site (Project). The proposed project is situated on
approximately 1,456 acres and is located approximately 5 miles north of Roxboro in Person County, North
Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). The site is comprised of both wooded and agricultural fields. Land use
surrounding the site is predominately comprised of undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural
fields and single family residential homes. Access to the site is via Country Club Road or Edwin Robertson
Road.
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park and
associated infrastructure (Le road improvements, stormwater, utilities, parking etc.) to accommodate a
semiconductor fabrication chip plant (commonly called a fab or foundry) that produces devices such as
integrated circuits. An integrated circuit or monolithic integrated circuit (also referred to as an IC, a chip, or
microchip) is a set of electronic circuits on one small flat piece (or "chip") of semiconductor material, which is
normally constructed of silicon. ICs are now used in virtually all electronic devices and have revolutionized the
world of electronics. Computers, mobile phones, and other digital home appliances are now inextricable parts
of the structure of modern societies, made possible by the small size and low cost of ICs.
Person County has identified the proposed site as an economic development priority and has invested
significant resources into the planning and due -diligence required to develop the site. The N.C. Department of
Commerce has identified Person County as a Tier 1 county, based on the average unemployment rate, median
household income, percentage growth in population, and adjusted property tax base per capita. Based on an
Economic Impact Study completed by N.C. Ddoartment of Commerce for the project, the ongoing, annual
employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County area
including 4,000 direct company jobs and aSaP
onal 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and induced
effects.
Due -diligence complete to date inc udese I Environmental Site Assessment, geotechnical study,
wetland and stream investigations, historic and cultural resource surveys, threatened and endangered species
surveys, a traffic impact analysis, and economic impact assessment. In addition, on-site concurrence meetings
and pre -application meetings have been held with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C. Division of Water
Resources.
The proposed Person County Business and Industrial site layout is comprised of 25 buildings including the 1
million square foot central operations facility and associated support facilities totaling approximately 320
acres (13,939,200 square feet). The site is suitable for the proposed development based on specific industry
requirements including, but not limited to, a minimum of 200 acres with compatible zoning, access to available
and high quality electricity (3 MGD during initial phases), experienced workforce, and direct routes to
interstates.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
7of13

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
Raleigh, NC 27607
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). Based on the proposed site layout approximately
46,959 linear feet of stream and 9.1 acres of wetland will be impacted by the proposed project.
MINI YY 41]WIT" I'll IUl9W0l
3.1 Site Location
The proposed project is situated on approximately 1,456 acres and is located approximately 5 miles north of
Roxboro in Person County, North Carolina (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). The site is comprised of both wooded
and agricultural fields. Land use surrounding the site is predominately comprised of undeveloped forested
lands interspersed with agricultural fields and single family residential homes. Access to the site is via Country
Club Road or Edwin Robertson Road. The site is located in the Roanoke watershed (HUC 03010104) and all
surface waters on the site drain to Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek, located along the western and eastern
property boundaries respectively. The property is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province.
A FEMA Flood Rate Insurance Map (FIRM) is included for review (Figure 4: FEMA FIRM MAP). The map shows
the project area as located in both Zone AE and Zone X. Areas of the site in the immediate vicinity of Story's
and Marlowe Creek, generally located along the western and eastern project boundaries, are designated as
Zone AE of the 100 -year flood plain. All other areas of the site are located Zone X categorized as occurring
outside of the 100 -year floodplain and having minimal flood hazard. Furthermore, these areas are above the
500 -year flood level. The project has been designated to comply with the applicable FEMA -approved state and
local floodplain management requirements and no increase in the 100 -year flood elevation is anticipated.
3.2 Site Conditions %Aahth, Ak
The site is comprise o both wooded and agricultural fields. Land use surrounding the site is predominately
undeveloped forested lands interspersed with agricultural fields and single family residential homes. Access to
the site is via Country Club Road or Edwin Robertson Road.
The majority of the site has moderate slopes along a ridgeline that bisects the center of the site. Elevations
range from 400 feet above mean sea level (MSL) along the western and eastern boundaries to 492 feet MSL in
the center of the site. Surface waters on the site drain to Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek, located along the
western and eastern property boundaries respectively.
The property was delineated by ECS, Inc to identify the presence and location of jurisdictional wetlands and
streams within the project area. The wetland delineation was performed in accordance with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987 Delineation Manual and subsequently issued Regional Supplement to the 1987
Delineation Manual. The initial field work for the Project Site was conducted in June and August of 2016. The
delineation was verified by Eric Alsmeyer on July 28th, August 4th and August 5th. Additional areas associated
with roadway improvements were delineated in November, 2017 and confirmation is pending. Documents
pertaining to the wetland delineation and subsequent confirmation are provided in Appendix B: Wetland
Delineation Information. There are no wetlands, open water, stream and associated upland buffers within the
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
8of13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Project Area that are under a deed restriction, conservation easement restrictive covenant, or other land use
protective instrument.
4.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
The overall purpose of the proposed project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park and
associated infrastructure (Le road improvements, stormwater, utilities, parking etc.) to accommodate a
semiconductor fabrication chip plant (commonly called a fab or foundry) that produces devices such as
integrated circuits. An integrated circuit or monolithic integrated circuit (also referred to as an IC, a chip, or
microchip) is a set of electronic circuits on one small flat piece (or "chip") of semiconductor material, which is
normally constructed of silicon. ICs are now used in virtually all electronic devices and have revolutionized the
world of electronics. Computers, mobile phones, and other digital home appliances are now inextricable parts
of the structure of modern societies, made possible by the small size and low cost of ICs.
The proposed business park will accommodate a stand-alone semiconductor fabric chip plant (commonly
called a fab; sometimes foundry) that produces devices such as integrated circuits. In addition, the proposed
business and industrial park has been designed to accommodate additional manufacturing facilities that
produce materials/products to support the main industry as well as research and development facilities also
required to support the semiconductor fabrication chip plant. 10
Based on the 2010 U.S. Census, the median household income for families living in the County was $54,474 and
the per capita income for the county was $22,189. About 9.4% of families and 12% of the population were
below the poverty line in Person County. The N.C. Department of Commerce annually ranks the state's 100
counties based on economic well-being and assigns each a tier designation. These designations are based on
the average unemployment rate, median household income, percentage growth in population, and adjusted
property tax base per capita. The 40 most distressed counties are designated as Tier 1, the next 40 as Tier 2,
and the least 20 leas istressed as Tier 3. Person County is currently ranked as a Tier 1 county.
Person County has i entified the proposed site as an economic development priority and has invested
significant resources into the lanning and due -diligence required to develop the Site. Due -diligence completed
includes a Phase I Environ tal Site Assessment, geotechnical study, wetland and stream investigations,
historic and cultural resource surveys, threatened and endangered species surveys, a traffic impact analysis,
and economic impact assessment. A copy of all reports have been included in Appendices B and C respectively.
The County has incorporated concerns of relevant stakeholders into their master plan and studied the
development needs and patterns of the industrial clients it wishes to attract. The County has completed the
rezoning, environmental and utility infrastructure studies necessary to attached industrial users, in order to
facilitate an expedient approval process. The site is currently zoned RC -Rural Conservation and the proposed
use is consistent with the current zoning and is considered a permitted use. See Zoning information included in
Appendix D.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
9of13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Based on an Economic Impact Study completed by N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the ongoing,
annual employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County
area including 4,000 of direct company jobs and an additional 3,870 jobs in the region through indirect and
induced effects. A copy of the Economic Impacts Study has been included as Appendix E.
The criteria evaluated during site selection for this type of facility is extensive. The categories are numerous,
but generally assess the site's location, site characteristics, infrastructure, financials and incentives. The Person
County Site ranked 356 out of a possible 423 available points evaluated in the site selection matrix completed
by CH2M Hill. A copy of the Selection Criteria Matrix has been inclu Appendix F.
The proposed Person County Industrial site layout is com ised of 25 buildings including the central
operations facility and associated support facilities totaling approximately 320 acres (13,939,200 square feet).
Based on specific industry requirements, a minimum of 200 acres with compatible zoning, access to available
and high quality electricity (3 MGD during initial phases), experienced workforce, and direct routes to
interstates is required in addition to a large number of optimal site characteristi tilized for the site selection
process. A site plan has been included in Appendix G: Waters of the U.S. Impacts
5.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS t%%,
The alternatives that were evaluated to determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative (LEDPA) include: (1) The no -build alternative, (2) offsite alternatives, and (3) on-site alternatives.
Each alternative will be discussed in detail below. The criteria used to evaluate suitable sites for the proposed
development generally include location relative to airports and major roadways; site characteristics (Le size,
environmental constraints, completed due -diligence, compatible land uses, zoning, etc), infrastructure (i.e.
power, water/sewer, natural gas, fiber), financials (i.e. land cost, taxes, etc), and incentives.
The No Build Alternative, which would avoid all impacts to aquatic resources, is not a viable option given the
Purpose and Need of the Project is to accommodate a semiconductor fabrication chip plant and deliver
significant economic relief to the residents of Person County which is currently categorized as a severely
distressed Tier 1 County. The no build alternative would result in a continued lack of economic growth
resulting in lost job opportunities, loss in tax revenue for the County, loss of local expenditure of dollars, and
residents would continue to be forced to commute farther distances for work.
It is rare that a single site meets all the criteria necessary for the successful development of a semiconductor
fabrication chip plant. Power requirements for a semiconductor fabrication chip plant are significant. The
existing availability of power sets the Person County Site apart from alternative locations. Currently the site is
served by a 2,350 Megawatt Steam Plant, a 729 Megawatt Steam Plant, a 49 Megawatt Combined Cycle Plant
and 230 KV lines and 115 KV lines cross the site.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
10 of 13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
The amount and quality of available power in addition to the amount of available water, wastewater, natural
gas and telecom further sets this site apart. Based on information from CH2M Hill there are currently only 5
sites globally that compare to the suitability of the Person County Site.
Within the State of North Carolina, the North Carolina Department of Commerce identified only two (2) off-site
alternatives that met the initial criteria for the proposed project and were considered during the initial stages
of the project. Detailed information concerning the site exploration activities are proprietary, however based
on information from Stuart Gilbert, Person County Economic Development Director, both sites were
determined to be too small to meet the necessary size requirements. Therefore, the Person County Site was
determined to be the most suitable option based on the size and currently available infrastructure (i.e.
electrical, natural gas, water and sewer).
Numerous on-site alternatives were evaluated in order to select the best development plan needed to meet the
industries requirements while avoiding wetlands and streams to the maximum extent practicable. Possible
siting locations for the central operations facility (1,000,000 square feet) were reviewed across the site. Due to
the location of Storys Creek in the northwest and western portion of the site, there was not enough usable land
in those areas to accommodate the central operations facility. Therefore, the central portion of the site was
identified as the most practicable location for the proposed central operations facility. Following the siting
determination, multiple concepts were analyzed for the final building layout. Ultimately, three (3) alternative
layout options were considered, including the selected alternative (see Appendix F). Primary constraints when
looking at the on-site alternatives were ultimately reduced to impacts to Waters of the U.S., topographic
constraints and available access. The selected alternative, the LEDPA was determined to meet the size
requirements of the proposed facility, resulted in the least amount of impacts to Waters of the U.S. and
provided for access to the site as well as connectivity of the main operations facility to other the support
facilities required for the site.
6.0 JURISD
To accomplish the goals of the Project, the Applicant has proposed the Preferred Alternative as the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA), as the least impactful action to jurisdictional
areas when compared to other alternatives. To accomplish the goals of the Project, impacts to jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. are unavoidable. The location of impacts to jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. identified within
the Project limits are shown on the attached Impact Maps (Appendix G: Person County Mega -Site -
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Impacts Maps - Sheets 1-6). Based on the proposed site layout approximately
9.1 acres of unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and 46,959 linear feet of stream are
required.
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
11 of 13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
7.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Impacts to jurisdictional features were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by
incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout
to avoid and minimize impacts. After the wetlands were delineated, an engineering plan was developed to
meet all needs at the site, while minimizing impacts to Waters of the U.S.
Alternative siting locations for the central operations facility are limited based on the size and layout
requirements. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 1 million
square foot facility as well as position the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize
impacts to 2nd order streams or higher quality streams. In addition, the proposed support facilities have been
designed and strategically located in interstream divides in order to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands in
those areas.
An Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Plan that meets the latest State regulations and adheres to the
methodology prescribed in the North Carolina Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act of 1973. Stormwater
management on-site will protect downstream waters from degradation. Therefore, the project should have no
effect on downstream waters, shellfish or other aquatic species.
8.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
491V _V9L
Based on the 2008, Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources; Final Rule, 'for every authorized
discharge, the adverse impacts to wetlands, steams and other aquatic resources must be avoided and minimized
to the extent practicable. For unavoidable impacts, compensatory mitigation is required to replace the loss of
wetland and aquatic resource functions in the watershed". Based on review of approved available mitigation
banks in North Carolina (updated 10/2017), no private mitigation credits are available within the specific
watershed (03010104) for the project. Therefore, compensatory mitigation for these unavoidable impacts will
be achieved through payment into the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in -lieu fund.
5.111
®®®110
® 11 ®®®®®
9.0 SUPPORTING SITE INFORMATION
9.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Information
An Endangered Species Project Review was conducted to gain insight regarding the potential presence of
Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed species within or in the vicinity of the Project. The following agencies and
associated databases were reviewed:
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
12 of 13

5410 Trinity Road P 919.859.5663
Suite 102 www.timmons.com
T I M M O N S GROUP Raleigh, NC 27607
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) - Information, Planning and Consultations Systems (IPaC)
• North Carolina Natural Heritage Department (NHP) database
Based upon a review of available information, one (1) federally protected species is currently listed by USFWS
for Person County. The dwarf -wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) is currently listed as endangered on the
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species list for Person
County (dated 12-27-2012). There is no critical habitat identified for this species within the project area based
on results from the IPaC database search. Therefore, the project will not affect the dwarf -wedge mussel or its
critical habitat. IAW
Furthermore, USFWS issued a scoping response letter on July 11, 2014 that stated that the proposed action is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at the site and all requirements of
section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied. A copy of the scoping response letters has been included in
Appendix C. *N
9.2 Cultural Resources ft4
A query of the North Carolina State Historic Prese ation Office (SHPO) database was performed for the
Project and the vicinity (0.25 miles from the project boundary) to determine the effect, if any, that the project.
No National Register sites or.tes Eligible for listing in the National Register are present on the site or within
0.25 miles of the site.
we
In addition, an archaeological survey was completed by Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas (ACC) in
July 2017. Twelve (12) archaeological resources were identified during the course of this investigation. None
of the 12 resources identified were considered to retain research potential beyond the survey level of
investigation and have recommend not eligible for the National Register. Concurrence from SHPO was
received on September 15, 2017. A copy of this report has been included in Appendix C.
6.0
CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
13 of 13

FIGURES

Path: R:\805\39329 Person County MegaSite\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\Person_County_VIC.mxd
HALIF C �, N
ss PERSC3N — N W E
1 , 15iS G
A erB'
R ser
�; � .�• � M1 F ; �- Newsho
F
1 srI
o Lake
AL
pI
r r
138 Q --, J=�' i � • - � '
• aqe ■.
R4 ry ,
- CAI-Vd _ 0 .
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS. ! 200
0 1.5 3- �-
Miles • r� . , i ,
PERSON COUNTY MEGA -SITE T I M M O N S GROUP ■
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 39329 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE (S): OLIVE HILL & ROXBORO
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 1350 ACRES DATE(S): 1971
LATITUDE: 36.4779 WATERSHED(S): ROANOKE
LONGITUDE: -78.9941 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 03010104
These clans and associated documents are the exclusive Drocertv of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in Dart and shall not be used for anv Durcose whatsoever. inclusive. but not
Ito construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: R:\805\39329 Person County MegaSite\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\Person_County_PARCEL.mxd
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

w
Legend
Project Study Limits - 114.2 Acres
1.. NONE
Person County Tax Parcels
NOTES
A
1. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2. TAX PARCELS SOURCED FROM PERSON COUNTY.
IDENT ML OWNER NAME
1 090900484164.000 ETREE LLC
2 0909-00545744.000 ETREE LLC
3 0909-00-72-4285.000 WAGSTAFF LINDSAY III & JOHN H
4 0909-00-64-9762.000 PHELPS CHRISTOPHER R & AMANDA
5 0909-00-77-2118.000 ETREE LLC
6 0909-00-97-1367.000 ETREE LLC
7 0919-00-06-0747.000 LEWIS L MICHAEL
8 0919-00-07-2534.000 ROBERTSON CROWDER JR TRST ETAL
9 0919-00-17-5232.000 ROBERTSON CROWDER & WALTER TRS
10 0919-00-27-0380.000 MITCHELL DEBORAH DORA
11 0919-00-27-2672.000 CAVALIER DEBORAH M
12 0919-00-27-4165.000 OAKLEY & SON INC
13 0919-00-39-7577.000 MONAGHAN DANIEL P & LAURA W
14 0919-00-48-2565.000 MONAGHAN DANIEL & LAURA WHAREY
15 0919-00-37-4182.000 NELSON LINDA & SHELLY LARIMER
16 0919-0037-0347.000 1 BLACK HARRY C ESTATE / LUTZ DEBORAH BLACK
17 0919-00-46-0994.000 IBURKS MARGARET H & OTHERS
18 0010-0050-1023.000 BERRYHILL EUGENE C JR & JOSEPH
19 0919-00-79-2607.000 BAILEY BARBARA A
20 0010-00-80-3287.000 BERRYHILL JOSEPH & EUGENE C
21 0919-00-99-6117.000 BAILEY BARBARA A
22 0020-00-00-5578.000 WILKINS JESSE JR/WILKINS JAMES
23 0929-00-18-3511.000 WILKINS ROBERT D & DEBORAH T
24 0929-00-18-5486.000 NELSON JAMES D
25 0929-00-18-6594.000 SNEAD TAMMY C/MICHAEL W PARHAM
26 0929-00-18-8478.000 SNEAD TAMMY C/MICHAEL W PARHAM
27 0929-00-28-0436.000 HOLT WILLIAM D
28 0929-00-37-8671.000 CARVER BUMPASS & CARVER INC
29 0929-00-28-4440.000 BROWN GARY BENJAMIN & KRIST B
30 0929-00-38-0386.000 SHILOH PRIMITIVE BAPTIST CHURC
31 0929-00-39-7544.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEEE
32 0929-00-38-5677.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
33 0929-00-38-8714.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
34 0929-00-48-1619.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
35 0929-00-49-2134.000 HOWARD GERALDINE TRUSTEE
36 0929-00-49-3442.000 MORTON LINWOOD STANLEY & NENA
37 0929-00-49-3596.000 MORTON LINWOOD STANLEY & NENA
38 0929-00-49-4750.000 BOWES KENNETH C
39 0020-00-40-6512.000 EAKER DAVID
40 0020-00-50-0358.000 DAVIS LARRY DEAN
41 0020-00-40-9169.000 WILKINS ANTHONY C & JANET L
42 0929-00-69-5238.000 PEED DOYLE & PEED DURWOOD
43 0929-00-49-8423.000 PRICE BILLY L & ANN T
44 0929-00-49-7138.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
45 0929-00-49-6084.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
46 0929-00-48-6920.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
47 0929-00-48-5776.000 CARVER BUMPASS & CARVER INC
48 0929-00-48-5613.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
49 0929-00-48-4479.000 CARVER BUMPASS CARVER INC
50 0929-00-47-3604.000 BRIGGS BILLY MICHAEL & NANCY T
51 0929-00-47-2481.000 THORNBURG DORINE
52 0929-00-47-2292.000 THORNBURG DORINE
53 0929-00-65-3785.000 WINSTEAD MARY E MERRITT TRUSTE
54 0929-00-35-9952.000 WINSTEAD MARY E MERRITT TRUSTE
55 0929-00-27-9451.000 FOX RICHARD EARL & TERESA H
56 0929-00-37-8142.000 CLAYTON DAVID G & FRANCES H
57 0929-00-37-8672.000 FOX RICHARD & TERESA H
58 0929-00-38-9120.000 FOX RICHARD EARL & TERESA H
59 0929-00-48-0229.000 DAY WALTER RALEIGH III & OTHER
60 0929-00-27-6974.000 ROGERS VAN MARTIN & DOROTHY 1
61 0929-00-28-4021.000 WILSON DONNIE EARL & MARY E
62 0929-00-27-2988.000 KNOTT JAMES E 11 & WENDY H
63 0929-00-16-5247.000 WINSTEAD J MERRITT
64 0929-00-08-9284.000 HARPER BRIAN K & MAYNELL J
65 0929-00-08-7228.000 WILKINS JAMES BRADSHER
66 0929-00-07-5748.000 EASTWOOD HOWARD L & DONNA W
67 0929-00-08-4452.000 WILKINS JAMES B
68 0919-00-88-9976.000 POWERS JESSE KEITH & TAMMERA D
69 0919-00-74-6411.000 HALLS AGRI BUSINESS LLC
70 0919-00-89-2185.000 WOODSDALE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
71 0919-00-78-1369.000 PULLIAM JAMES A & HOLLY P
72 0919-00-26-9992.000 SMITH EVELYN W UE
73 0919-00-26-8592.000 SMITH EVELYN W UE
74 0919-00-27-8015.000 WALKER ROBERT L & OTHERS
75 0919-00-26-4509.000 RAMSEY ALBERT& SALLEY EST
76 0919-00-26-4915.000 OAKLEY & SON INC
77 0919-00-16-8883.000 ANDRADE MICHAEL A & LINDA C
78 0919-00-16-1760.000 ROBERTSON MAURICE
79 0919-00-16-2454.000 RANSOM DELORIS B
80 0919-00-06-6444.000 RANSOM DELORIS & REVERDY C
81 0919-00-06-2415.000 BRINSON DORIS FAYE
82 0909-00-96-9253.000 BRINSON DORIS FAYE
83 0909-00-95-5975.000 JAMES JOHN J & JULIA A
84 0909-00-95-3567.000 J & J INVESTMENTS & SALES INC
85 0909-00-93-7908.000 PARKER DANITA BROOKS
86 0909-00-84-0761.000 WILLIAMS HESTER MRS & OTHERS
87 0909-00-85-3692.000 WARREN JUDY EST
88 0909-00-40-4723.000 WAGSTAFF LINDSAY T JR & JOHN H
89 0908-17-11-6694.000 RILEY DOLORES W
90 0908-17-31-1220.000 WARREN R TCOMPANY INC

Path: R:\805\39329 Person County MegaSite\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\Person_County_FEMA.mxd
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Legend
Project Study Limits - 1,456.4 Acres
Intermittent Stream(R4
)
Perennial Stream (R3)
-"'-"' Other Stream
Ponds
Wetlands
NOTES:
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP
AND ECS.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
N
0 1,100 2,200 4,400
Feet
- r
s
X14 f�i. - •..
r
O
.A v
F•
.
z
04 0
�a
i
t
a "v
��°y Y�3 M C
04�,r _ . - �,. � - ♦ •dor
'..s�' x+` � � 5r , Vin,. •'s 34:
„ _ _UJ
a L
UJ
,
k" k
..i
J^A
W
1'. U /LLy
,r
1' r.
h., .
� � O
0
t
tl
G
1 �Y M
_ r W W w 1
'! O
m
v
err Ei
a -as
r w � H
1 -
O
.y
iA� 1
n
IZ
LO 0
■y x ,
Xft Iiy � ` �nS .J. �• _ •� _ LL �1 x W U
r.
+F' Q
H
,� 7'
a� U
Y7 t
. ^. };p 'L.. r....•: • .fit-'. i
F• N
t o
r
o'►^""^ ri
e.
p:
w L
rJ
A.
i
, \
rs.. �; .
¢.. 4:r .
- 1,'
r r 4-r �: I 5 W
r 1�
rryye�
5• 1
'S W
fix' •�
- •f. - -. m'�-
/ i R w.
,
�L. ♦ - ♦ � /' _ ter. 1 �' • r � ;r ' w>. ? 1r O
llss��
"_ - -
r
,r� F
a
A .
+ i rf
. tDp .. � - ' - � P • ♦ ♦ � - ,. - .. -:i z�' *�� 1 _1 t j� .z.,. • . •,� .$ ►'vi ..�.i nr�'.:. �� .C,is�p; ......N.r�,�bA`"^ di (Q
r'x
a t�.
IK
'4 •ii'1 �R ' "k . 'S• :111' i, .I
O' A i
- �. >•: v'� ":� the
x
c a
-F• r i� T. •A.. .rte
1r1w
1.
v
i
- slum•. 'i; `
r
1 A- -
a • �'i ,1 iS , r .. 4•'
r
"
r _ _
.��� ern ••}1. ..�. •�.. ,.�..-ti�'
i to' • ;y1.' �l. ' 1 � 1.. e'r 1. N
H: 11
r
8
1:7 r
,
-
a
, 1 S
1P•:
• i f
a.1'•
:-+ev..
-h
r••1 1 W
1f ! .
h-
• vF
a T S•
A
i'
,
ti +
s �r
r
w 2 '�•. sZ
- kT_-'• 2• it t
� h
L
a +.
t >
s n •. t,
DATE
,<; y, oc 11/22/2017
;, r3 DRAWN BY
o ; �'" '1,'w? r„;�, :► L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
,q f�i` «;{:•,���_ �� �Py ,<. ��,y�� �kF ,r�'� L. MAJOR
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
..
1” = 1/100,
:3• y- ��� 'a.;� ' a- ::-�?54• g.• ► 114 _��•..
F
- � ane Rq r - ' - � -- "�'.:-'•'.�� ,�" ..� -
Char ' r•=.4 - , °G r r �`•;, !
t!0 'I ky Nh
� -'tom; K�- x:` � :'.�: ��,.r-:.:.. _ •a ,
�•� - � �: �0 _ �•A {{•��,, ' :�:': �' � �- � •`�� mow. - _ a ,. �; ' ku
Q
� �.,' r ^ 1• .x.a `f 'i ' � � ' L ' .41" ,'M:' f•q7 :'r,p -
F �,z;' - �' d'� •* kyr. f . k Z
•t ru.. - :3 '.A!••.h fir.:. '► y KR''..
R•�
y"a c A i
a.
i
.y c
ees Mill ! ,. rr•," `�. •:�,.' ... ;,. :t:..;. •'� ti:. 7.'r ;.�. ,`�?''
it "'ky: _ •.�. __ i �1�_ws:� 3;X+r, [°y".�.:�` ! .r;,.
UJ
13 UJ
In
Ce
.;..,
ILLUT-N-mLU
.s
�4 G �;.> w..:.-, fs ' ;'•,:: - sF:. ►e Banks
.y �• rT P' ? ' O
w
es F C rte �• `� , r _,. 3 O U)
LU
1'.
i
„'1 Q
w 1 methia Dr k • �or�
caws
r •} -•E a ....�A -
F �, ' ' '� } ale as _ a '•� V
4w �.
• 'qR,r .. 'y,r - i5 }`C" ��prE.. �:: � -' _;A:7Ec .. £��3. , ¢.. � '\
� � � - • r ��� � ► � � ,jam rw
a
,.':!r Cattle Dr V/ J
4 r h��/J • `'• 1--w f a'�w `� ` i' j vl ` d i ! is :t' I � ` ,! ,ter i, Bp e ' WE W
- i { •�' a ; 7,�,i '.YAe�� ':a .- k T, `�" �° `i
- • '•rip' - � `•. •'' %' .7v'L . "r'r * � ' m > J hyeQ UJ L
"�;�v
,.� - �•'"i-' ' �° �r' J s : 1 p .. " •t _ „ "[: >� .�, Wrenon Ave
•s s rr H °p a 1 @ �. C Ln
LU
't.. � Or - •'� r�,,,�_;..., �. ��•. f. � �.�..,:;.e F E� _ _ i,• �.�'.. ?,��, -'pk•: Katmandu Dr
1.
_ ><- Ca rve r -Holt R � �!�F :� ," "� � . J �-�.' `� �1�� '. S5 •:�' r
;; , :A+rr17 �� • 4 Mt.. c •'r •• t • : J �, 3 v) ve1'Ch4.6 tQ :•;,-`'.i:• - _
r'' ;' E'3 Ills. ♦'. '+�! Peaceful Rd T
•�.: :, � "�'�.+h' --. tr i ; i1; - y 3 p •-r r1Lr�—.• r ._ � , .c . �l � � -
Tonker Dr r ehe r LL
•�''' r •t-x�, •. '°s.�,� _ rte: ..` si � ri, :., .-
f14s
d
• i a a'
'- f.
s' s err Fi7L
sold
•Ivy.- i.��:. ?'•�'� - ��s Y `� r,.` .,s
.:4 Poplar Lane • � �s;L�'`'''1.. - x-. _ : �f -: sib � _ �r _ ... -. ; ...
� � M '• F,yF. � � 1 r
• �:, u. ` .fir _: � y 2 _ Y. ; . r. W d
• ,�' ,. ;, �.;� � ,� :�.. � st <y -�-w.,7.• _ � JOB NO.
tai' - ..� •� ,:ro�4� k -•�� Clayton hh m 3 r
��u. �'. ° � •�_ '� -� >,
39329
,y,�. M1. �- -
+ yy L-;�` �1.Iq�'� •rr S , ,
a Ir wt
R _ ,�' �[:: ;,;:•� - '-; .: ���,; � _ •� p SHEET NO.
�IL
1 OF 1

APPENDIX A
PERMIT APPLICATION

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
OMB APPROVAL NO 0710-0003
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Stuart Middle - Last - Gilbert
First - Anna Middle - K Last - Reusche
Company - Person County Business and Industrial Center, Inc.
Company - Timmons Group
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- PO Box 1824
Address- 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
City - Roxboro State - NC Zip - 27573 Country - USA
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27607 Country -USA
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. MAREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. MAREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
336-504-3079
919-816-7745 919-866-4500
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Timmons Group to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Person County Mega -Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Story's Creek and Marlowe Creek
Address Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 36.4779 Longitude: -W -78.9941
City - Roxboro State- NC Zip- 27574
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID See attached parcel map Municipality Roxboro
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Wake Forest office take NC Highway 98 to US 501 North. Stay on 501 North until the intersection of Chub Lake and Country Club
Road. Continue on Country Club Road to the intersection of Edwin Robertson Road.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The proposed Person County Business and Industrial site layout is comprised of 25 buildings including the 1 million square foot central
operations facility and associated support facilities totaling approximately 320 acres (13,939,200 square feet). The proposed business park
will accommodate a stand-alone semiconductor fabrication chip plant, additional manufacturing facilities that produce materials/products
to support the main industry, as well as research and development facilities also required to support the semiconductor fabrication chip
plant. Access roads have been designed on the site to provide connectivity for each facility. The proposed design also identifies locations
and sizes for stormwater control measures to be installed as part of the proposed project.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The overall purpose of the proposed project is to develop the Person County Business and Industrial Park and associated infrastructure (i.e road
improvements, stormwater, utilities, parking etc.). The proposed business park will accommodate a stand-alone semiconductor fabrication chip plan
(commonly called a fab; sometimes foundry) that produces devices such as integrated circuits. In addition, the proposed business and industrial park has
been designed to accommodate additional manufacturing facilities that produce materials/products to support the main industry as well as research and
development facilities also required to support the semiconductor fabrication chip plant. It is rare that a single site meets all the criteria necessary for the
successful development of a semiconductor fabrication chip plant. Power requirements for a semiconductor fabrication chip plant are significant. Th
existing availability of power sets the Person County Site apart from alternative locations, not only in North Carolina, but also globally. Therefore, Person
County has identified the proposed site as an economic development priority and has invested significant resources into the planning and due -diligence
required to develop the Site. Based on an Economic Impact Study completed by N.C. Department of Commerce for the project, the ongoing, annual
employment impact of the new facility will result in approximately 7,870 jobs in the Person County area including 4,000 direct company jobs and an
additional 3,870 jobs it the region through indirect and induced effects.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
In order to accomplish the goals of the Project, at total of 9.1 acres of unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and
46,959 linear feet of stream are required. These unavoidable impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of compensatory wetland
and stream credits through the N.0 Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). The purchase of this compensatory mitigation will ensure the
unavoidable impacts proposed by the Project, will result in a "no net loss" of aquatic resource function and value to Waters of the U.S.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 9.1 wetland
or
Linear Feet 46,959 stream
23, Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions) Alternative siting locations for the central operations facility are
limited based on the size and layout requirements. The current proposed layout provides sufficient area to construct the approximately 1
million square foot facility as well as position the facility along the existing ridgeline which will serve to minimize impacts to 2nd order
streams or higher quality streams. In addition, the proposed support facilities have been designed and strategically located in interstream
divides in order to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands in those areas.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? FX Yes F—]No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
Due-diligence completed includes a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, geotechnical study, wetland and stream investigations,
historic and cultural resource surveys, threatened and endangered species surveys, a traffic impact analysis, and economic impact
assessment. The wetland delineation was verified by Eric Alsmeyer on July 28th, August 4th and August 5th. Additional areas associated
with roadway improvements were delineated in June 2017 and confirmation is scheduled August 31, 2017.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- 710 Oak Grove Road
City - Roxboro State - NC Zip - 27574
b. Address- 1618 Medfield Road
City - Roxboro State - NC zip - 27574
c. Address- PO Box 3176
City - Roxboro State - NC Zip - 27574
d. Address- 1459 Country Club Road
City - Roxboro State - NC zip - 27574
e. Address- 849 Oak Grove Road
City - Roxboro State - NC zip - 27574
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
NCDWR 401
NCDEQ E&S Plan/Grading
NCDEQ Site Plan Permit
NCDOT Encroachment Permit
' Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

APPENDIX 6
WETLAND DELINEATION INFORMATION

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
US Army Corps
of Engineers
WDm ngton Disinct
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: ht ://www.saw.usace.arm .mi issions/Re gg PermitPro am.as x , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 5544884
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number. 910-2514633
Fax Number: (910) 2514025
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address
City, State:
County:
Directions:
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road Project Trace
Roxboro, North Carolina
Person
Site A - East/West of Country Club Road; Site B - West of Site A,
across Storys Creek; Site C - North of Edwin Robertson Road
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
0909-00-26-0057 (875.43 acres)
0909-00-40-4723 (475.55 acres)
Paul Stephens
9001 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27617
919.861.9910
pstephens@ecslimited . com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Lindsay J. Wagstaff Jr.
Mailing Address: 31 Reams Avenue
Roxboro, NC 27573
Telephone Number: (336) 599 -1467
Electronic Mail Address3: N/A
❑✓ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
' If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
%�- " (�'x /' - /'- //- - -, �- , "r� '/'
Property wner (pleas/ t) Date
Pra6erty Owner"Sipn0dre
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protoco.s, skip to Part E.
s Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
0 Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
✓❑ Size of Property or Project Area — 1,000 acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form 6.
FVProject Coordinates: 36.4701900
Latitude -78.992964°
Maps (no larger than 1 Ix17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑V Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
0 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013
Pag

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
aWetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets a Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
aField Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http:llwww.usace.army.,m_ /M:ssions!C vilWorks Re ulatorvPro ramandPermits re su .as x
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
httortal.ncdenr.or c document I bra et file? uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c& rou old=38364 and,
htt www.saw.usace.arm .mil Portals 59 docs re ulato ublicnotices 2013 NC5AM Draft User Manual 130318,pd
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
P-11 Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑V Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑✓ Must be legible
✓❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑V Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F✓ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
aall depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑✓ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑V Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
FVI Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑V When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundaryis s depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official.
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
❑✓ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
Fbe at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
Finclude a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

0
?
Edwin Robertson Road
SkIf
Ile.
or
Country
Club Road
%
54 X
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Approximate Original Site Boundary
.7
SOURCE:
FIGURE 1
United States Geological Survey
SITE LOCATION MAP
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map:
Roxboro, Dated: 1982;
Project Trace — Site A
Olive Hill, Dated: 1968, Revised: 1994
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
NC Quadrangles
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Contour Interval= 10 feet
Scale: 1 " = 1,200'
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

£nB
t
R
M
r-
OV
1�Wkik 4YY
1NIKF - - -
_ �• - 4�
Fro - -
Wk •.
'
Gas �C;
f
H Of 11
L
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
Approximate Original Site Boundary
SOURCE: ��I FIGURE 2
USDA Soil Survey of SOIL MAP
Person County Project Trace — Site A
Issued: 1995 Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Map Sheet Numbers: 6 & 7 Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 1,000' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

A
LE
Approx
Site Ba
Approx
Wetlands
- Fresrywate
_ Freshwate
_ Estuarine and Marine Deepwaler
Esluarine and Marine
_ Freshwater Pond
_ Lake
Riverine
_ Other
SOURCE: FIGURE 3
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory Project Trace —Site A
Mapping Program Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1 " = 1,250' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
_1

AM
LEGEND
Approximate Original
Site Boundary
r
Approximate Site
{
Boundary
-
wew
sir.raane naw ananm
wb.•.. wr,.
—
�
Ir
� s
_ -
— _ —
-
n emu e.ewe�ya�+bn arnwr�
e.s ter wNa anm r ewe oma n wwe
mrrnr •r N>.�+w�i...r e... +wn�rorm
a®.,.rwwowmerrcnr..wrbww+
ra•.r ...wrw<w.bnaai..,M.m. avaww
niwxrweuMMM
Mto+M.wMrarMwWgpbprwpnw.Mw4bl1
r.p niww.YNMWItrµ�b0lPn T.l�M1YN+r
mY1b0lprr
0118I510W WLK
!
! e�aenwr sow iaix.roe rma an
❑ ��
�rirr►
mr• r..�www.r.e...w.
® ml51k GWP�R�IFB5131EMW�APfA:
•
�
�
-
L'1 � •� !
b➢vMHFNirLl WM(7k1
OrfswlGMrwwealtue.I.vgawekW Aaw.a�
Y,
-
Itww �6IIO.YMr
r raNWbq
_. vl.w..rrr
�.
`� w
•
ll
r •�I �� �
rb.wwNw
...,.. sr�-...... �.e
e.reeww..w.t.
'�•■ i
t. ■i -
� AL • ti� � 1 _
c.
SOURCE:
FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM
FEMA FIRM MAP
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Project Trace —Site A
Program Website
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Panels: 37200
200 00)
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Dated: 007
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245
i
Scale: 1 " = 1,400'

THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/8/16 - 6/14/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED
BY THE USACE OR THE NCDWR. THIS IS NOT A
SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY
PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE.
HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON COUNTY.
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
State Buffer Requirements: None
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
(Western Portion)
TRIBUTARY FLAGS = I Wetland Boundary
Watershed Classification = Class C
Nearest Water Body = Marlowe Creek
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
(Eastern Portion)
Watershed Classification = Class CWatershed
Previous Stream Flags = 527 Recent Stream Flags = 782
=Roanoke River Basin
Previous Pond Flags = 30 Recent Wetland Flags = 403
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0'
Previous Wetland Flags = 30
Previous Total Flags = 557 Recent Flags = 1,155
-
Total Flags = 1,712
i
I
SOURCE: I FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Person County Project Trace - Site A
2013 Aerial Photograph and Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
ECS Field Notes roe Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1 " = 1,100' 1 ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 O Approximate Location of Wetland Area Approximate Location of Pond
S31 1-6
W51-3
z ti
W7 1-90 , ; W8 1-28
,L, f.�1'. `? ►�}�``., ' _, S301-98
(Marlowe
r• - y r +� ; ,.r- _ .'1�� Creek)
�• J
S371-81 �>!•�.
W4 1-30 -
S391-14
S38 1-7
S341
S351-4 -
lip
S361-48
S331-60
E W6 1-36 S321-61
SOURCE: I FIGURE 6
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Person County Project Trace — Site A
2013 Aerial Photograph and Eastern Portion
ECS Field Notes roe Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 550' 1
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Data Point
DP -1 O Approximate Location of Wetland Area
WC 1-11
WCA 1-14
SF 1-7
WA 1-2
SG 1-42
SOURCE:
Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 700'
LEGEND
WD 1-25
WDA 1-7
Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Culvert
Approximate Location of Pond
SL 1-52
a WH 1-26
WG 1-10
SS 1-7
ST 1-5
0/
e
SU 1-2
SR 1-45
WE 1-3
r••
SP 1-6
'r
FIGURE 7
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace — Site A
Western Portion
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

Classification
West of Country Club Road
Stream Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start Flag Stop
Additions
Data Forms
SA
1 34
48*
Already done
SB
1 23
Already done
SC
1 15
22*
Already done
SD
1 20
Already done
SE
1 10
Already done
SF
1 7
SDP -1
SG
1 42
SDP -2
SH
1 2
SDP -3
SI
1 39
Storys Creek
SDP -4
SJ
1 11
off-site
SDP -5
SK
1 4
off-site
SDP -6
SL
1 52
SDP -7
SM
1 136
SDP -8
SN
1 4
SDP -9
SO
1 40
SDP -10
SP
1 6
SDP -11
SR
1 45
SDP -12
SS
1 7
SDP -13
ST
1 5
SDP -14
SU
1 2
SDP -15
Wetlands Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start Flag Stop
Additions
WA
1 2
WA1
1 2
DP -1
WB
1 3
DP -1
WC
1 11
tt WCA
DP -2
WCA
1 14
DP -2
WD
1 25
DP -2
WDA
1 7
tt WCA
DP -2
WE
1 3
DP -5
WF
1 4
DP -5
WG
1 10
DP -3
WH
1 26
DP -4
Classification

Classification
557
1155
East of Country Club Road
Stream Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start
Flag Stop
Additions Data Forms
S1
1
40
Already Done
S2
1
2
Already Done
S3
1
36
Already Done
S3a
1
6
Already Done
S3b
1
2
Already Done
S4
1
5
Already Done
S5
1
8
Already Done
S6
1
100
Already Done
S8
1
14
Already Done
S10
1
14
Already Done
S11
1
7
Already Done
S13
1
16
Already Done
S14
1
2
Already Done
S16
1
7
Already Done
S16
1
52
Already Done
S19
1
60
Already Done
S23
1
22
Already Done
S29
1
32
Already Done
S30
1
98
SDP -16
S31
1
6
SDP -17
S32
1
61
SDP -18
S33
1
60
SDP -19
S34
1
1
SDP -20
S35
1
4
SDP -21
S36
1
48
SDP -22
S37
1
81
SDP -23
S38
1
7
SDP -24
S39
1
14
SDP -25
Wetlands
Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start
Flag Stop
W1
1
19
Already Done
W2
1
11
Already Done
W3
1
72
Already Done
W4
1
30
DP -6
W5
1
6
3? DP -7
W6
1
36
DP -8
W7
1
90
DP -8
W8
1
28
DP -9
WZ
1
4
Already Done
Previous Wetland
30
New Wetland
373
403
Previous Stream
527
New Stream
782
Wetland Total
403
1309
Stream Total
1309
1712
Total
1712
1712
Classification
557
1155

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the del
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
6-11H LL) yw S/' Lp-
Hydric Soil Indicators:
to
or
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvne Loc
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Sampling Point: Did- 4
Texture Remarks
CCC
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Probiematic Hydric Soiis3:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
I,,oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Slte: v% <<
Applicant/Owner: 'JP2
— Si
City/County: 1 Pe.,JOti Sampling Date: 6 --I - (to
State: Nr— Sampling Point-
Investlgator(s): S Ir-! -4V -e I Section, Township, Range: ----
Landform (hlllsiope, terrace, etc.: 41-114w A - Local relief (concave, convex, none): 6--e-4- Slope (%): t ��
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): P Lat: A- q2jN39`^J Long: 191 q1o, 6-/ Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: W NWI classification: /Veti e-
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes� No Is the Sampled AreaV/ /
Hydric Soil Present. Yes No within a Wetland. Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reoulred)
PrIm,ary Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
rSurface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
/Drainage
lgh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Patterns (1310)
✓Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
^ pry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
✓ rayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7)
I on Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
V Inundatlon Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (Inches): _—
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 4 L
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous nspectlons), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont •- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
1
3"
Absolute
Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
S_ a Status
1. 5'.1,, " "4 v5
Lla
L
2. ru ram
�Lp
FAr-
3.- at.{�1� 1.rs ►�
7N
y PA -C
4.
6.
= Total Cover /
50% of total cover: q D 20% of total cover: (�
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1. -I;)(wr v 40 ✓ (SQL
2. A Ct✓ 710 L/ E1kc
3. �iel+,It NiGv� Zo ACW
A
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t3 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals'
(A) (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
50% of total cover 20% of total cover: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 �/2- Dominance Test is >50%
1. _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
6 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 ) approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. 'T ,.r,,,J PZ --f4/ (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Sol )
1.
2.
4
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 'pp" 9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
o
to y w S/C�`-�-
C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matnx.
_'Type:
Hydric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thiinn Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
my Gleyed Matrix (F2)
]eepleted
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Lie C« - 7rc.( e, — "� A City/County: _ _ �o��► / Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: 60---I, (: PL State: 14*J C- Sampling Point: �'—
Investigator(s): 1) Section, Township, Range: "'—"—
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): 1 1.1 /-r c, Local relief (concave, convex, none): ro,- x-01 Slope (°k): 1 }•
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 36- LIAM 3 Long: - W. '13 1-9 22 `' W Datum: ,
Soil Map Unit Name: W NWI classlflcatlon: P Fa k P ✓ a� �+
Are climatic / hydrolog'c conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNo within a Wetland? Yes V/ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes EK No-
Remarks-
HYDROLOGY
oRemarks•
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reoulred)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required: check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
­1_/4urface
Igh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1370)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Dry-Season
Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
ayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
� turation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
�ron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_✓ Inundatlon Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1373)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations: /
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
-7.
Depth (inches): 13
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches): fi k°
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): A_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ° ) % Cover-S�eciiess7 Status
1. OACc✓ v--1 Naw ., �2-0
2. �n� a�.w� DCGi ce���bl
e 7
3. c �_'IAPM_liu.. ,� v� I 2�
ELL
4. 121, �� rttii !i.<< ?Jo �7A,
5.
q =Total Cover
50% of total cover: n 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 3 o t ) /
1. Ace-" r +
uSVL.&
2. �e(4kgMw occ�,ee,4,,,ki
3. U� `!•..�s„�-T-�',vr�, rte,
4. V',
5.
6.
_3 0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Z�'� 20% of total cover:_
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3" )
1. 1, Q, 44VLAt- Jc„_t i C� V/ CU
2. yoke- L 4- c, Lo
3.
4.
6.
S =Total Cover
50% of total cover: (� 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 - 1 )
oft
r
4.
5.
7.
8.
10.
11.
C� " = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 0 20% of total cover:
t
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3" )
3.—V i R1 P4 -.-
Total
Total Cover
50% of total cover: (s 20% of total cover:
yrs here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: % S (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: I (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�
_- Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point: D
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvne Loc Texture Remarks
10 IqlL
'Tvne: C=Concentration. D=Deoletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linins, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
,Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
/
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5kfeAm SF S�
Date: �� Project/Site: Latitude:
Evaluator: S N?'ret.-tS i County: Pe -(Sc, Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle one) Other
if a 19 or perennial iia 30• Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
m. ueomor now (5uototal = V )
1 ",Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
01
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
B. Hvdminnv tSuhtntal c v y Vv ill v„J
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
3
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3El
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
M1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 �Aoamscl' . 'C' n V - ?
Date:
G-9-1(p -'> (10-11-1
Project/Site: o
Latitude:
Evaluator: t n'e k� SAC e-YI13
County: (ZoX b0�-D
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent S-
Stream DeterminaAn (circle one)
Ephemeral Inte
Other
if a 19 or perennial if a 30*
l nt Perennial
a g. Quad Name:
4Z
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I J' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
es =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Ot
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discssions in manual �J
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = C )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
4 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. biology (Subtotal = 71 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
k21
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Ot
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 A . '�t� P' q
Date: (o_ _ t _ t �{ _ (�
Project/Site: �R-1
Latitude:
Evaluator: �I S t1S
County: RSoej
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ti(
Stream Determing jon (circle one)
Other
if a 19 or perennial if a 30"
Ephemeral Inter"I ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
CV
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
as =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
G>
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Q1.5
Notes:
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a
0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
QOf 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
as =
1
tom. biology (Subtotal = lr ) ��
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

smam-�:r
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 n P-
Date: -1( 7 G _I Y -1
ProjectiSite: -i; Yof"f,
Latitude:
Evaluator: 1P- amdk' �en
County: TC(Zgo
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if z 19 or perennial if a 30' ig
ial
Ephemeral Intermittent P ttl
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
25. Algae
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9>
2 1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.51
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a
No = 0
e A
artinual ununes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 0 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1.5
No = 0
es = 3
V. b!OIOQv (Subtotal = C t- 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Ct� `��V1,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Lo 1(0_'
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or Perennial if a 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = _L
i 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
L Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Oo = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = y A /
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 J %
% .2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
Z
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
1
1.5
No = 0 Yes = 3
0
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S -treaty\ Sl/ Sbp,ce
Date: �
Co - 8' co
Project/Site: /cucQ-
Latitude:
Evaluator: ((0 skap rig
County: �
Longitude:
19
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if a 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
A
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
N J1
1.5
10. Natural valley
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
E��So
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual " l
B. Hydrology Subtotal = <Z�k /,a), &K
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
StCM�
SL J Spy --
Date: cg_g.1 b
Project/Site: '"(t (D__
Latitude:
Evaluator: �' f\Q,kk ��.ZS
County: _kgnor-\
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if z 30"
Ephemeral me i ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �1- )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
M3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
A1
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
Ly
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussio sin manual u
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = Co, )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1-21 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Y =
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = n )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
rg,
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
0th -
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SV\
Date:-� �(P '� -�(�
Project/Site: _ryop(L
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:�p
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle e)
Other
�� ,S
if a 19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Pen
I e.g. Quad Name:
L'r
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0.5 0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1 1.5
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
01
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Other = 0
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
-
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = U )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0) 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = -4- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1K
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
01
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identifed using other methods. See p 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - - 0-/ y -�(o
Project/Site: _�Ih(3'_
Latitude:
Evaluator: �,�\�� sft���S
County: Rc5u\
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if a 30`
Ephemeral lntei&ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = it )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N (=- 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ''0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
3
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
81
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
j
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
meq on..
S© , SbP-(0
Date:
ProjectlSite:
Latitude:
Evaluator: mat ne11�
County: 1�Q��1
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent o�
�1
itEphemeral Internent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if t 19 or perennial if 2 30"
0 0.5
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= I /."D )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0 .5
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1`�-
2O
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
02
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
d
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
- 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = u
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SP . Sb 19-11
Date: �- ffi%(P -/ �(P
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: -r �I� �(��
County: PC
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if;! 30"
Ephemeral Inter r�i tent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
t'7
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = \ `" )
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
12
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
ty
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
b.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual U
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high ter table?
No = 0
= 3
C. Biology Subtotal = NJ
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 10 1
1
2
3
22. Fish
1
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth MO
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Sawecw'_
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5(Z j Sf)p" 12 -
Date: - g-) -a �, I l� ,
Project/Site: T "LCcl
Latitude:
Evaluator: -D�qxne.\1 S
County: �exsz n
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2
if z 19 or erennial if Z 30
Ephemeral Inte t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
�_l
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = \ I )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5 1 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
�3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
= 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discusvs in manual �f
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = '� \ )
12. Presence of Baseflow IL
10 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 M 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yed\-7 3
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11 ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2)
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
to
1
2
3
22. Fish
11 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambedFACW
= 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth r = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Sjy;e M -
'Rs ; St P-13
Date: �g. -� (o -( ✓1�
Project/Site: - 67 Ce,
Latitude:
Evaluator: �0.`C���
County: r1'eCsDo
Longitude:
Total Points:C
Stream Determi circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if t 19 or perennial if 2,30*
Ephemeral termltte Perennial
a g. Quad Name:
%I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= I )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
O
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
No = 0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
01Q
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discus ions in manual l
B. HAroloov (Subtotal = 1;f )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
11.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
�e-
U.
t31010fav (Subtotal= V:� ) 1__1/
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
101
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
OtoeN= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
3T
Date: V -&') b ---,> (D - I
ProjectiSite: ) c0.0
Latitude:
Evaluator: 'Dm nel\ r 5-IeQY�enS
County: ?f ^
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral nten�e tt Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if z30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t L )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
©
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0iv
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual �J
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9 c5
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
05
s -
C. Biology (Subtotal = rk ) �/
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
05
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manua+
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: _'� .' (� - - (Y l
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: -J�7W" Ul <County:
Feac>r1
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
2�
if Z 19 or erennial if z 30"
Ephemeral In ttent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
01
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yf6=
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
Q
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
01Q
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual v
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = Gj )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yf6=
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 1w
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SA-feann
530 Sop-- ((,
Date: (O _� - 1(D_ (0 _11-/0
Project/Site: aiz
Latitude: see /V"V
Evaluator: -paroe it �S {�Q�J�jS
County: 'fason
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle
Ephemeral Intermittent Per n, ial
Other ty
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30`
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
n-) e --
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �'" ' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
r2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1`2
=
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
m
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CiD
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
W
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Y
-)3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
C 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
=
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal= Ilk )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1
2
3
22. Fish
0 0.5 CD1.5
23. Crayfish
00.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0751 OBL = 1.5
Othe =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
`�-

NC DWO Stream identification Form Versinn 4.11
s31 S.e- 17
Date: (0-���� �_ l-� (0
Project/Site: i
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: eC
Longitude: r r
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Z.
2
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral In er nittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
in
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1 1.5
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1 2
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Cl)2
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
•1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =
Yes = 3
araticiai ancnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hydrology iSubtotal = _
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
2 3
2 1
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
Rdl§1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y =
u. bioloav rbuntotal = - i
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
•
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1 1
2
•
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
c&+. rrmpmuians I U I U.b 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 I
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

S�reaAv\
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SSZ _) sia_ is
Date: �S��C4 (9 , fc � _ (� Project/Site: � (� I Latitude: Shjvt
Evaluator: p�(��( S County: vecsbR I Longitude: tl
I
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other i
Stream is at least intermittent t
if Z Igor aerennial if? 30* Ephemeral Intermittent Peer nlal I e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0.5) 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
•2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Othe
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
arnticiai ancnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = ( n 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5) 1
1.5
1777 Soil -based evidence of high wat r table?
N3=0 Y -
1
U. bloloov (subtotal = %/\ 1 \ Al
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
r 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othe
*perennial streams may also be identifed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
s3�3
Date:
(P _ g�� (P a �p
^`
Project/Site: \���,
Latitude:
Evaluator: Pawn- I I/
County: usoY1
Longitude: t
Total Points: n
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittentY•
if Z 19 or erennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Inte ent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: tt
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__EL_)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
M
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
K22
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1©
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
ki j 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual v
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
01
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y
1
C. Biolociv (Subtotal = L�' ) \_J
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
b
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
N
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
= 0
'perenn'al streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: _ QA' f 6 -1 � 46
Project/Site: 1cQa
Latitude: t i
Evaluator: :MjU (\Q',` S
County: 00
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
�
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Inter4ent Perennial
Other
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
"'CT
e.g. Quad Name:
5Zr
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `l " )
a
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
'1
0 0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0J
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
NE- 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discrons in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = �9 .11� 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
C.
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1)
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high wah table?
No = 0
-
Y" -
C. Biology (Subtotal = "\) _%_/
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
W
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
A 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
5-
�K i Sop- 2
Date: ����(� -� (p �� `� j(p
Project/Site: F (SU'
Latitude:
Evaluator:tISZS
County: fe'�G>Nj
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
'12)
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
03
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
02
0 0.5
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Oth - 0
3
9. Grade control
0
r 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
\6.51
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
=
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ (Q
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 M5N
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high mter table?
No = 0
0.5
- 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ` L_ ) �)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
y
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Oth - 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S2G "Sb P, -,z 2 -
Date: (0 _ :�' -I& % (0 r l V -
Project/Site: VCU &I
Latitude:
Evaluator: lb -cm -M,
County: e(6w
Longitude: I
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other I
Stream is at least intermittent 2
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Inte tt nt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.51
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
s =
1.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
A
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5j
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
=
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discusions in manual \ I
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.51
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
s =
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6 ) \J
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
kv
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othe =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SReW
S93 , Sbt - `2.?
Date: _ 8 ( _� - / _ /
Project/Site: o�
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: P!Zb
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if z 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent Pee nial
e.g. Quad Name:
10
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal -= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Y
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed I
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
ftfp)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discu Bions in manual u
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
9,5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
3
No = 0
Y
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed I
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othe =
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
_51M3 " sae- Zy
Date: �g ,I (p �o +� (p
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator: IPW (��1� S ��S
County: P nsw
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent I
Stream Determintion (circle one)
E hemeral Intei(mttent Perennial
Other
if z 19 or perennial if? 30" 2 `
p
e. Quad Name:
9
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 N
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = kn
J
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 s =
1
C. Biology Subtotal = 'U
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
110
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othe
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Sf feay>/�'
539 ) 2s
Date: -�,) (o �� -� Y `�
Project/Site: I ��e
Latitude: Com
Evaluator: ��` S �
County: PeC50 0
Longitude: ` t
Total Points:�)
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other f
J ��
if z 19 or perennial if z 30•
Ephemeral Int ittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15, S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
)©
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
EP
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual \J
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = (Q )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
t'1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
O
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
es =
1.5
U. tilologv (Subtotal = v1 ) \_oor
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othe
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

J r
r __ s r• T�!
k-
5 �'4
f k �
1
ti
w- •'_
1-7D IL
1
f1 R Lt 1J
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: I FIGURE 1
United States Geological Survey 7.5 - SITE LOCATION MAP
Minute Series Topographic Map: Project Trace - Site B
Olive Hill, Created: 1968; Revised: 1994
Edwin Robertson Road &Country Club Road
Roxboro, Created: 1982; NC Quadrangles
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Contour Interval - 10 feet
Scale: 1" = 1,000' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

4r r�
1'
+r,
I
Ir
��r.s-, two
SOURCE:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory
Mapping Program
Scale: 1" = 750'
r,
LEGEND
_ Approximate
Site Boundary
Wetlands
Freshwater Emergent
- Freshwater ForesledlShrub
- Eslua6ne and Marine Deepwater
Esluanne and Marine
- Freshwater Pond
- Lake
- Rivenne
Other
FIGURE 3
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
Project Trace — Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/14/16 & 6/15/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE
USACE OR THE NCDWR. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES.
STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL
BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON COUNTY.
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 Q Approximate Location of Data Point
0 Approximate Location of Wetland Area
State Buffer Requirements: None
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0'
S101-9
W21-10
S91-50
_ y
•'' S31-18
S51-21
100-105
SOURCE:
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS = I Wetland Boundary
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 236
Pond Flags = 0
Wetland Flags = 81
Total Flags = 317
S4 1-12 S2 1-4
Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 850'
.' Ips• . �' �; .
W51
S61-7
S71-4
hr S81-4
S8 1-4
3yy : SI 1-39
7 if
R
FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace — Site B
Edwin Robertson Road & Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

Flag Designation
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Flagging
Flag Start
1
1
1
1
1
Total
Total
Flag Stop
107
4
18
12
21
7
4
4
50
9
236
Flag Stop
5
10
52
6
8
81
317
Additions
100-105*
Additions
Data Forms
SDP -1
SDP -2
SDP -3
SDP -4
SDP -5
SDP -6
SDP -6
SDP -6
SDP -7
SDP -8
DP -1
DP -2
DP -3
D P-4
D P-4
Classification
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
Flagging
Flag Designation Flag Start
S1
1
S2
1
S3
1
S4
1
S5
1
S6
1
S7
1
S8
1
S9
1
S10
1
total
Flag Designation
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Flagging
Flag Start
1
1
1
1
1
Total
Total
Flag Stop
107
4
18
12
21
7
4
4
50
9
236
Flag Stop
5
10
52
6
8
81
317
Additions
100-105*
Additions
Data Forms
SDP -1
SDP -2
SDP -3
SDP -4
SDP -5
SDP -6
SDP -6
SDP -6
SDP -7
SDP -8
DP -1
DP -2
DP -3
D P-4
D P-4
Classification
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: f V m: Ir44- Tv ac c City/County:
Applicant/Owner: VM -1o', Cain'
investigator(s): S+- FXeaf
a�S�v •� Z fc'vjoL Sampling Date: 4, - -'/6
Slate: _ L Sampling Point: bP 1
Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Szer
Local relief (concave, convex, none): CO k-ed—c.
Slope (%): 1 %.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): t'' Lat:
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Long: 001 531 , W
Datum: i^f GJSY
Soil Map Unit Name: CW
j�Hlgh Water Table (A2)
NWI classification:
/U r, e
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for
this time of year? Yes
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
"Normal
Yater Marks (131)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
Are Circumstances' present?
Yes V/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soli Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes� No
Yes No
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
urface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
j�Hlgh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
�rainage Patterns (1310)
aturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Yater Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water
Present? Yes No
V/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): _
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): k
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
�T
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �� ) %� over SStatus�
1, lll� ��r�,,y
EAC3.
4. -
f o = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Ltu 20% of total cover:_
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: // �Q
1. Aav
4. gam. ,lam ,�.. 7, ✓ l�t'V
6.
_i = Total Cover
50% of total cover: J 20% of total cover:_
3�
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
5.
6.
3�' = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
t
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
i.—'T-,,c ,,_'uJ 1'0 iv et/1 aw -4 V oa
%o L
2. W�Jcf� ,�t aveJIATC
6.
9.
10.
11.
b " = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3" 20% of total cover t2
I
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 31 )
C. V, FA C
3. U1 �1`r V��urc1: clic ^� S AC
4.
5.
a " = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 0 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species 1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: D� (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� ` - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) n he ght.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YeSZ--No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Dp—
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
D" j 0 *L 3/t (a- (-(.,/ ( 4.9,..
Hydric Soil indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_A/Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136,147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes v No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: f'('W, 'PG " (r«a— D City/County: K&d'0;L­' Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: v 60—,, EOL' State: o % Sampling Point: IDe'1
Investigator(s): tie4 Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hiiisiope, terrace, etc.): k &.4a 44,,v Local relief (concave, convex, none): Coy -e -r ^c- Slope (%): �
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: �t/ Long: f , d1911' q 91 o w Datum:W (IS
Soil Map Unit Name: W k -F- NWI classification: /)owL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes� No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present. Yes No within a Wetland. Yes t/ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
2urface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
igh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
:r`
saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ *ater Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)ry-Season
Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes No
P%,/ Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): k �I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: '30 ` )
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: 10 f Z
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 0 ) AA
1. i/11 r M f l %n
2. ELL
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover -
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: -10. ) n /
2. .�bf'1M1 wty'i L�Z G[A H'1 V
4.
6.
L4 3 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: go )
2.
3. ©ei,_ woo( c Z°
5.
7.
S.
10.
11.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: "► u 20% of total cover: 1 b
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. �� )
1.
2.
3.
50% of total cover:
or on a separate
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: T1S �.
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/� Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_V 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profiie Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvae LOC2 Texture Remarks
U^ 2ul u `��� ck4l<�
2 —24_ 0 S/
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosoi (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
MS=Masked
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
— JCoamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
✓Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matnx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136,147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yesy/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: �ro��c� Iv 4«- S kZ City/County ax�w�O/ CeVia,, Sampling Date:
6- ti–ic
Applicant/Owner. PzVJ." C&—.J!4 C0L State: �li — Sampling Point:
investigator(s): S temsSection, Township, Range.
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): IL. tl la'w Local relief (concave, convex, none): Co%4C0.N". Slope (°k): < .
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: Long: �_ . (%)1Z k6 G LJ Datum: WW G�
Soil Map Unit Name: C W NWI classification: -AJ avi :e
Are climatic / hydrolog'c condit'ons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �1/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showinq samplinq point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes� No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary indicators minimum of one is required: check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
lgh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulflde Odor (Cl)
T/Oxidized
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
ry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish
�_
Sedimenl Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): ��
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): tj
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes --,/ No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous .nspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: S )
Ansoiute
% Cover
uommant molcator
Species? Status
1. Cc�1 '1 Igzvi
Z-1
V Cw
2.
FAC species
x 3 =
3. la - %rci
Z 3_
UPL species
4. A t i v Y jr,.�
5.—" -hyc
Z�
'J.,o
FA -
% t,/
—+�-
6.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
SU 20% of
total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: w 1
IkK-iS
V
�
2.oCc t 1, -t
,�-
3. 1c. C`
5. fig Y S
ZJ
6.-
14 0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1) ) / ��
1...LV (- 1 ✓
2. cry y .�J,Y� AC
3.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ILI) )
L10
3.h'�►n}j`pr,/ �(G,►c� fJ 3 a �() CVS%
5.
6.
8.
9.
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: > 20% of total cover
•. t
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Sy ) /
4.
Sampling Point: OR 3
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ` (A)
Total Number of Dominant (�
Species Across Ail Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species J
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �` (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
X5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
5. Hydrophytic
=Total Cover � Vegetation ✓/
I
50% of total cover: of total cover: Present? Yes No
�_ 20 /o °
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: tor- 3
Depth Matrix Redox Features
�-inc-hes — Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
o /( 1oa
74 10 14YL UI/I 16 10 yK
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Lpamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_+ depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: N ec. - 7'4t4- — 1;-k- City/County: RJ kf- V-0 C.— Sampling Date: 9-- 1J 1
Applicant/Owner: Pf State: A'L Sampling Point:
invesligalor(s):� kctif Section, Township, Range: �—C—
Landform (hlllsiope, terrace, etc.): —AcvuI,", /Local relief (concave, convex, none): C. `" «'"L Slope (%): 2 1�
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• Lat: _ b .'I": - A) Long: 05 V' W Dalum:VJ
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic / hydrolog c conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
NWI classification: i✓ov.t
No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes St/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes n/ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required; check all that a I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
rtace Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
tigh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)_
D -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tllled Sails (C6)
rayfish Burrows (C8)
(133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
ArDeposits
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
/1
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): -� 9_
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: °!o Cover S cies? Status
Zo D -C
2. Ace,v4--, 7,0�
4 r^t
3. v _ C40-
4.
4. 1 i1 ;i (a ¢ sa,t,� 7i� F�Fit✓
9- = Total Cover
500% of total cover: 20% of total cover:_
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
2. A. -:r LN Yom. WY h ;7
4. Cc 1 bA Lu
6.
L = Total Cover
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, FAC: IS
or
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
`�
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, FAC: �' 1 •
or
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:�� Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3C t ) Y- Dominance Test is >50%
I. As : r., ; N � *"1.4 s� / 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 AL-„ i4-_dL7— _ 4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
3. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6.
� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: ( c
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 11 t )
1. 0%,-( l " J{M.r, 5rV 3 b ✓ �'At w
3.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11. _—,
�^ `� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Jy 20% of total cover: �-
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 36, )
&Ata �— V�c_
3. t+b •i --+-d l'a (,-,. (I/ FAL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) D5H.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – Ali woody vines, regardless of height
5.
Hydrophytic
3_ = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: tT 20% of total cover C Present? Yes No
numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture
V_ 2 (') y K? _ c(
I Zit �JIL T�_�'> (& r/L 94 t `> C M -
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_,l!oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Sampling Point: 0(-q
Remarks
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S Do 1
Date:
Project/Site: Pr j a_ } TrOta-
Latitude: 36 4 -+;a 36 N
Evaluator: S+irkrtj� 00vv'ell
County: P�,
Longitude: �y
0
1
7 I�II(
Total Points:
Stream is at i �}
least
�
Stream Determination (c'
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other
if z 19 or erenniif 2 30" ' I
if
Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = L� )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5 4f2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
Q
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
10.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
(-T7 1 5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
manual UILUFlUb are no[ rateo; see aiscussions in manual
R_ HvdmInnv Miihtntal = -9 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 4f2
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
Q
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
Q
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
10.5
%,. DlviUgy LJUMoial = __ t -r..,) J
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
')
1
0.5
2 3
CD 1.5
22. Fish 0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
10.5
1.5
25. Algae
0 i
0.5
(-T7 1 5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FAW _=0. 75;) OBL = 1.5 Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes E (��g., J
4
Sketch:
i

NP IlWfl Ctraam irlantif!irat-inn Farm VPrcinn 4-11 RV' Z
Date: �j "� - � �
ProjectfSite: � T- S"k- Q
Latitude: 36-cig3,jys ',A/
Evaluator: 5.�-� (,�Q..f
County: �p
Longitude: 96j .00 fl
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 Z S
Stream Det (circle one)
Other
,
Ephemer Intermittet Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if Z 30`
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1\ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
®
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
jzD
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
her -
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
67;
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R W%Arnlnnv Miiinfnfol = In !�' 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
Ni = 0
e = 3
r, Rinlf% /Q"hfnfol =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
m
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
ef D1
2
3
22. Fish
®
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0)
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
jzD
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
her -
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: PI - JIM ILf S*Z
Sketch:
W

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SD Q-3
Date: C q- Project/Site: _ Sj (3 Latitude:
Evaluator: (,� �,a County: , Longitude:,
Total Points: Stream Det s+a% n (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2 �f!, �S Ephemer Intermltte t Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if 2 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--U-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
®
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
= 0.7-P, OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = /n 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 V
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = S. :4-r 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
e-1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
111
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
ro
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
c5ACW
= 0.7-P, OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4.11
sor- zI
Date: G - (f
Project/Site: F -T _J
Latitude: 34,4,4 IS(( o,,v
Evaluator:
County: �ei.1a�,
Longitude: _
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent !L 'L, �-�
Stream Dete ' (circle one)
Other
if Z 19 orperennial if 230*
Ephemeral ntermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_
18* Continuity of channel bed and ban
2. Sinuositv of channel alona thalwea
1 0 1
9
Strong _
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(3)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
23. Crayfish
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
1.5
o = 0
Yes = 3
FACW = 0.75;
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc i ;sions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = f
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = �'�S )
I--
i -o i
o"
1.5
0
0
No=0
1 2 3
:157-0.5 II
1 1.5
1 1.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0>
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: q 64 af
al
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -' (�
Project/Site: eq .S�C Q
Latitude:
Evaluator: vi
County: fiYJ o
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 t
Stream Determi (circle one)
Ephemeral itte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if Z 30"
1!!otT
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--D_)
Absent
Weak
Mo rate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0�;"�
CJ
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
f21
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
4.61
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 er -
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual '
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = '. S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C. Biology (Subtotal = S ) `-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
C)
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
f21
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
4.61
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 er -
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I 2y
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 _s or, 61
Date: S - (�
Project/Site: UT S
Latitude: 3G , , tq 6 OTS- avv
Evaluator: f "..'i
County: �evfo,
Longitude: . *9 j. oo 33y "
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 29 -).. f
if Z 19 orperennial if 2:30*
Ephemeral I ermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
©
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yes = 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
m
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
G
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
3
9. Grade control
0
i dla1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = R l
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.,rL
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= S. i -J_ )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
a)
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
rp
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
AT
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.7
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I �.'< <f J I P1 F
Sketch:
5

N!` nWf1 CtrPam Tdpntiiieatinn Form Version 4.11 SVe-
Date: �_ j�
Project/Site: ' S,4L_ 6
Latitude:
Evaluator: �p ti
County: f ev_f,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c'
Other
Stream is at least intermittent �(D. 2S
Ephemeral IntermittenPerennial)
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 orperennial if 2:30*
0
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 23 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
es =
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
11.5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
1
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I-Ivrlrnlnnv tCi ihtntnl = -1 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
a 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
es =
C Biolo v tSubtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
•
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
•
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
•
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
9
22. Fish
0
CU3>1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.4
11.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
AC = 0.7 , OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See P. 35 of manua .
- -
_
Notes: 4
I
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Sop- F
Date:
Project/Site: (9-T Jrjk
Latitude:.;( t } 5'3 °A/
Evaluator: f.� �tt�_)
County:
Longitude: -- 10 ISO
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2�
Stream Determ' circle one)
Ephemeralermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18• Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
CD
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
n
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1:10.5_31
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
AC =0.
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hvrirnlnnv fSuhtntRI = !3- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
1
C Rinlnnv tSuhtntRl
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
MJ
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1:10.5_31
1.5
25. Algae
'9
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
AC =0.
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: l -t u J-1 o
Sketch:

1
lo
Ile
PTI-K—
LEGEND_
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: - FIGURE 1
United States Geological Survey SITE LOCATION MAP
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map:
Roxboro, Dated: 1982; Cluster Springs, Project Trace — Site C
Dated: 1968, Revised: 1987; Olive Hill, Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Dated: 1968, Revised: 1994; Alton, Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Created: 1968, Revised: 1990; NC
Quadrangles; Contour Interval = 10 feet
Scale: 1" = 1,000' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

: N
Jim
HE X
~ r
NN
f~
o
I
(/�,yy
r _ ,
w
yam_ 7r T
r �y
F•' .-
SOURCE: 1 FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM FEMA FIRM MAP
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
am Website Project Trace —Site C
Program
Panels: 3 Progr m W & 3710999900) Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Dated: 6/4/2007 Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1 " = 1,100' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

THE SITE WAS DELINEATED BY ECS ON 6/20/16 — 6/22/16, 6/24/16, & 6/28/16. OUR FINDINGS HAVE
NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE OR THE NCDWR. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. THIS MAP IS FOR
PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES. STATE MANDATED RIPARIAN BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED
FOR THE SITE. HOWEVER, A 30 FOOT LOCAL BUFFER IS REQUIRED FOR STREAMS IN PERSON
COUNTY.
State Buffer Reauirements: None
Nearest Water Body = Storys Creek
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed Classification = Class C
Watershed = Roanoke River Basin
Local Buffer Requirements: 30-0'
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND/JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY FLAGS = I Wetland Boundary
STREAM/POND FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 868
Wetland Flags = 482
Total Flags = 1,350
ML
_ I
Fig,ure 8
3
IFO'd re47 I
we 4
� I L
SOURCE:
Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1 " = 1,250'
FIGURE 5
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace — Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 Q Approximate Location of Wetland Area C= Approximate Location of Pond
S31-78 S251-26 S91-9
(Storys Creek) S261-18
- ,
S81-56
W71-20
W 10 1-208
W3 1-5
5
r =
f Y
W4 2-17
I
& . 1� �F,
�=Emj
SOURCE:
Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 600'
P41-16
S61-46
S5 1-7
P3 1-13
w•s.
■
S41-39
%r W5 1-10
IL!fir
Y
P2 1-15
_,...�•. arc ��''
W1 1-20
FIGURE 6
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace — Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 Q Approximate Location of Wetland Area C= Approximate Location of Pond
W8 1-23`- ;
W151-17 r� ; rt S121-7
3' •. t:-R},� 'fit .; ,
S13 1-5
FW1
S101-46
'~ 1
S21-12
W111-2
W61-5 S191-11 S151-68 W121-5
SOURCE: I FIGURE 7
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Person County Project Trace — Site C
2013 Aerial Photograph and Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
ECS Field Notes Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 600' �� ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary Approximate Location of Stream
Approximate Location of Data Point Approximate Location of Culvert
DP -1 Q Approximate Location of Wetland Area C= Approximate Location of Pond
S231-30 v S221-8 JW14
08 (East)
` 8 (West)
4
�•.i..+ 3._
S271-16
S241-54
i
SOURCE:
Person County
2013 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Scale: 1" = 600'
•j,
■
.M1
S141-73
� ti f•,�
FIGURE 8
FLAGGING LOCATION MAP
Project Trace — Site C
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245

Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start
Flag Stop
Additions
Data Forms
S1
1
92
SDP -1
S2
1
37
SDP -2
S3
1
78
SDP -3
S4
1
39
SDP -4
S5
1
7
SDP -5
S6
1
46
SDP -6
S7
1
2
SDP -6
S8
1
56
SDP -7
S9
1
9
SDP -8
S10
1
46
SDP -9
S11
1
66
SDP -10
S12
1
7
SDP -11
S13
1
5
SDP -11
S14
1
73
SDP -12
S15
1
68
SDP -13
S16
1
15
Questionable breaks
SDP -14
S17
1
27
SDP -15
S18
1
3
Questionable breaks
SDP -14
S19
1
11
SDP -16
S20
1
2
SDP -17
S21
1
12
SDP -17
S22
1
8
GPS'd as S27?
SDP -18
S23
1
30
SDP -19
S24
1
54
SDP -20
S25
1
26
SDP -21
S26
1
18
SDP -22
S27
1
16
SDP -23
S28
1
15
SDP -24
total
868
Flagging
Flag Designation
Flag Start
Flag Stop
W1
1
20
DP -1
W2
1
7
DP -1
W3
1
5
DP -2
W4
1
17
DP -2
W5
1
10
DP -1
W6
1
5
DP -2
W7
1
20
DP -3
W8
1
23
DP -4
W9
1
1
DP -2
W10
1
208
DP -5
W11
1
2
DP -6
W12
1
5
DP -6
W13
1
4
GPS'd as W6
DP -6
W14
1
128
DP -5
W15
1
17
DP -7
W16
1
10
DP -5
total
482
Total
1350

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:�f � - �yc�cC. — S,p-c.- (- City/County: �x�t'� Qcwo Sampling Date: 6 ` -Z,_I f;
Applicant/Owner: ee i'j .. State: NL- Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): 1-.I Local relief (concave, convex, none): c z C'—L Slope (%): <
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: —1-6— . ij'M h 11 J Aj Long: `I V� �8 6 k (rl Datum:iyl� f Li
Soil Map Unit Name: W VLU NWI classification: Ne he
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that awl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
urface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Y High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dralnage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
D/r4-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
\Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations: /
O
Surface Water Present? Yes 1/ No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes V, No
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (Inches):_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available -
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Vers on 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 0114- t
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 3V ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot 1size: . /
CA
20 = Total Cover
LI
50% of total cover: _(J 20% of total cover: t
L
Herb Stratum (Plot size: L(obal
(-J P f.&V w r
2. J-SNC.^J �_aY�g
Lj J V 06L
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Jc7 i' (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_J2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5 Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7 Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height
10.
11.—
=Total
1.=Total Cove -
50% of total cover: L l 0 20% of total cover:__
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �, )
1.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the del
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
p- 4 (U 41h. 1/1 vu
–Z< to if- q1t _—
Hydric Soil Indicators:
document the indicator or
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc
RM=Reduced
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point: Of- I-
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ L amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
eplated Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: N rt -F 'Tv4K. — d'Xt City/County. Q oil +ry� e �� � � Sampling Date: 6 —7-0-1c
Applicant/Owner: Z"Y. C"F bL State: NC, Sampling Point: -'0 2
Investigator(s): 3 • v i" -/. ( i Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): �'l �ofw/s Local relief (concave, convex, none): c oNcoww Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MI RA): Lat: X' 49 it' l2 ` � /� Long: c J9 Z 1 C V4 Datum:VJ &f 8 Y
Soil Map Unit Name: \r4C 0 NWI classification: ./✓"�^C
Are climatic / hydrologic condit ons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes i/ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks -
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary ndicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
urface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)_
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
h Water Table (A2)
/Saturation
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
�ralnage Patterns (610)
(A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
ry-Season Water Table (C2)
�rayfish
�/ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) -
Water Table Present? Yes3— No
Depth (Inches): k i
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 't' �e
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available -
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot sizer ) % Cover Sr)eciesP Status
1.
2.
3. Actl
4. L' �L
Sampling Point: D F- Z
worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ` (A)
Total Number of Dominant 1 (�
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species T
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ('30 r • (A/B)
50% of total cover:
t
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Q = Total Cover I Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: ` 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
:je112- Dominance Test is >50%
= Total Cover
=Total Cover
Prevalence index worksheet:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
L( i
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
SaDling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
Z40 rr,A,
FACW species
x 2 =
1. � �A•�a�`�f -cc " rpt -4 4-
� `�
S�
Q,a�1� r1i4V3
Ito �
FAC species
x 3 =
2. �-
�-�
FACU species
x 4 =
3. 'A�� `�'�
4. ACV. 'n !V_j_
ccAAA
r2v �
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
50% of total cover:
t
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Q = Total Cover I Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: ` 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
:je112- Dominance Test is >50%
= Total Cover
11.
✓1 '' = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30k ) /
1. �+ io 64Md.,.., �(,� c c• 1 `� �✓ �i) C
3 -Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants. except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
G = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 1-r20% of total cover: I
Present?
numbers here or on a separate
Yes VJ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
3 u� )
1. .T"ig.f,.,
CAe•-iry
2-t7
-,,/ �qL�
2. Iso 4A*%e%4
3. it. 1 - t
A-, � I I
4. w"�d�✓c,yLl;�
Awl ted,
2'
—� Z�
11.
✓1 '' = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30k ) /
1. �+ io 64Md.,.., �(,� c c• 1 `� �✓ �i) C
3 -Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants. except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
G = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 1-r20% of total cover: I
Present?
numbers here or on a separate
Yes VJ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Doti
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ jcbamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes v No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
l
Project/Site: o r V"i 04 -TV c LL J,•i:° L City/County: ti Jkbk3r ,rD
e'vi-, Sampling Date: b Z 1' I t�
Applicant/Owner: Klvi,
Investigator(s):
Landform (hilislope, terrace,
State: -Itj_`= Sampling Point: An- 3
Section, Township, Range:
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): C Lat Al Long: X w q 3-10 -:' - J Datum: W CEJ
Soil Map Unit Name: \N 11r P NWI classification: �� C
Are climatic / hydrologic condit ons on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soli Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes " No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
yilgh Water Table
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)Sparsely
Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
(A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
alnage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
idized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
,Water Marks (131)
Sediment
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
�y-Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
rayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): a -
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
L'
Cov
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3� ) % er S aes Status
1. 13.4.Iti "w" 3 L;, JACw
2. Acv- v%t y, .Ua 30 —�` FA c -
IL -2p =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 y 20% of total cover:_ 2
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: I) t ) /�
1. V/ 3v FAcv
2. t✓
3. i J .� LC1a ���va k ct 30 FA 6
4.
r rt O = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Ia " 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 32 ` )
2'' = Total Cover
C'
50% of total cover: to 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) r
r --i
2. �! Z'-
�`
3. WPLl b.lY •� CM�:Nd.,'[( Z' "
4. 0tiotlt-, FAC0
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: (�y 20% of total cover: G
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 t )
1. /'��k,( ao(eV Cc•+J �� b
2. Jy^; 1*--)(
3.—V 1h! r. FAL_
Sampling Point:10 P- 3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species `
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: lD (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: D (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
Ur -L- species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
VRapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2
_ - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
_,o =Total Cover Vegetation /
50% of total cover: Jr 20% of total cover: ` Present? Yes V No.
here or on a
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: OP -3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
10 �K ��( 'Iy ib 4,t rlc f M
RM=Reduced Matrix. M
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: T W j r4 I V t,C L — S+(— (— City/County _ 9 J'?C " - / ? l vlo- Sampling Date: t; —Z I -16
Applicant/Owner: evi. Cp --I-., 9-04State: ✓L Sampling Point _
Investigator(s): r4"int-11 Gy3"? it Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hllisiope, terrace, etc.): (-i .�.'�Ir i Local relief (concave, convex, none): C°`"� �"' Slope (°k): Z-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lata . Li 1Z S IJ Long: — '� %,ti ?0'3-T' N,J Datum: W �I
Soil Map Unit Name: W k Z NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ _ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes %.1/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
urface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
}sigh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
_✓Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils
ry-Season Water Table (C2)
✓ Crayfish Burrows
_ (C6)
(C8)
�J Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth
I/ (inches):
/No
Water Table Present? Yes
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
✓ No Depth (inches):+
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous nspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
I
Absolute
Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �� )
° Cover
S cies? Status
occ? �v1i1
rZCW
2.2.+�4 iM�9✓LNJ
2�
TACW
3. Act, Int
7
TALI
4.H C zV1
to (.tuc a
2
-
5. CZ (isj Is't-d5sh
2`y
Vol = Total Cover
10 ' =Total Cover
50% of total cover: S4 20% of total cover: CO
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: t )
2.
6.
—T-0 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: i 2 -
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3u. ) , /
1_5'i--, ru "" Z� F,4(V
2. 4,`J c, e- s 4 hr Wt,., V Fitt3.
4.
-
10.
11.
(�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: '� 20% of total cover: t l 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:' ) /
1_ o loa�.^�.d( , vc.G,�cc« IL �/
Sampling Point: OP - Y
Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: cl S I (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multioiv by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals. (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
oHydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: r 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0
50% of total cover:
_ 20% of total cover: 2 v
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: V )
2.
vin' Yi
7
TALI
3.
to (.tuc a
2
L
5.
CP I•H•J ( g -1"44.14S
?
V
10 ' =Total Cover
50% of total cover: S4 20% of total cover: CO
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: t )
2.
6.
—T-0 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: i 2 -
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3u. ) , /
1_5'i--, ru "" Z� F,4(V
2. 4,`J c, e- s 4 hr Wt,., V Fitt3.
4.
-
10.
11.
(�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: '� 20% of total cover: t l 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:' ) /
1_ o loa�.^�.d( , vc.G,�cc« IL �/
Sampling Point: OP - Y
Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: cl S I (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multioiv by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals. (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
oHydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: r 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color(moist) %
Color (moist) % Tyne Loc
Texture Remarks
DAH
�O SIL l2 jo,
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
C�c oGti
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_( oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_( oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_✓Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '-/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Vvw:ecA- 7v4tC — -Gle L City/County:("AX1' �/1•{ V-3, SampingDate:
Applicant/Owner: PPv1P� Cp-n,, tyc State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): .lykcy ifl9r-w h Section, Township, Range: r'—
Landform (hiiisiope, terrace, etc.): -A.,. Local relief (concave, convex, none): r oycc Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): f Lat: Long: Datum: V&S r
Soil Map Unit Name: C irW NWi classification: ? FV i L
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are *Normal Circumstances' present? Yes 1/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present. Yes No within a Wetiand? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetiand Hydrology indicators:
Secondary indicators (minimum of two required)
Prlroary Indicators minimum of one is required; check all that a i
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
�`Surface
jiigh Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
tArainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
No
Surface Water Present? Yes4No
Depth (inches): L)
Water Table Present? Yes
-7
Depth (inches): D
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
r VIIJI c vvn nnn
a, muIwivi
Tree Stratum (Piot size: 30 ) °o Cover Species? [S^taAtus
1. Ac t,
C I S C.
3.Ce ( h:, f -e n'/&L 2 Aur
4. l'e. r17.�y..-. 2J T VA—L,
5. 1 ace, c?i.4z U `'I U t/ FACi,,J
Itla = Total Cover
50% of total cover: Y -o 20% of total cover:
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 3� )
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
VAc�
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
J1c
3.
Ce 1 4,1 (S e kc
a.�Acr.✓
5.
ojgc-_etc,"i-J4 i
V
cid
ILI0 = Total Cover
Sampling Point: 90" S
Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ``)� (A/B)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
�phytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: —/- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3,1 ) _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. A 6 ­,; u -N Ay -,(As (k( _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. c•4,Yi Ste' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
12 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
J� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: c , 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3Ut
1.
2. CGJ
,
4. So c'In,nr,r i`c cHI. Mrf►i tI, /, raw
11.
fSU =Total Cover
50% of total cover: q -r 20% of total cover:_
WoodVine Stratum (Plot size: 3y % ) (' , A
A1 . / `� k. N.F �v� M. Y.-.-tn C �-f C
3. V 1 i, r �!�•-F•^-epi l� �'�S i_s
Remarks:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: ( ) 20% of total cover C
or on a separate sheet.)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in he ght.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes J No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point: Dr -S
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confine the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
v-
I° VIR 3/1L,
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
- --
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'1N-1+1,
�� yrs /C' ( ., C
(� LL4/
t
�/l. t - C ... L.
D=Dealetion. RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matnx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: f"', tC -TVIV- City/County: Sampling Date: 2
Applicant/Owner. State: kr,-- — Sampling Point: D P_
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: ��iQDCC>. 4a=VG"�
Landform (hllislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): C0ACAye. Slope W:
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:� AJ Long: ��i.. �) �"f ` ��� Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: �k NWI classification: t jonE
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes A No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?�f? Are Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetiand? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetiand Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaulred)
Primary ndicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
`. Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 4- 1
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): t (P
Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
r--
Tree Stratum (Plot size: v ) %over Species? Status
1.k�� r'y)xu rvl OF}�
2. L K a_U_ 6
3. Q 1% Uq D 1(7 'FArQ
4.
o. !_�
(0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 3 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: Soy )
1. ke#' r'Ub!'uYV\-
2. i (i U 2Q C
3. 5--ct ixvPk1Q L _ tk2 ,
o.
L O = Total Cover Q
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: U
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) f;i4L
1. 11t'latr)Kuw S:vle-4e.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ,1 )
2. � \UM J�Si � • A I0TUVA _-b-
7
10
1
1.
std = Total Cover
50% of total cover: OK.� 20% of total cover:
r
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) d
1. totiu 1 F6K-
2. �OX� 'Ao t) 1OA-kcb,"s I Ff}G
Sampling Point: `�'(P
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Speciesp
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
MultIDIV by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
/1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
J 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptat ons' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody v nes, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
3S = Total Cover Vegetation
( A No
50% of total cover: —Q 20% of total cover:_ Present? Yes
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: r -f- 6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist)
%
Redox Features
Color (moist) % TvDe Loc Texture Remarks
off—
tocvc
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Ak L.
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
04 -zo
+T.,..e• r -r,,.,, e.,t��t�,,., n=nonlotinn RM=RPrinr.Prl
Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes --/—Y\ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: el^'i Ac �' -Ty
4-4 -
1,1-f- C- City/County
,cL /F i rr • -- Sampling Date: 0 C/—
A licant/Owner: 0?'1�.,
PP
6--- �
op(-
State. /VL- Sampling Point: �v•- Z��I`
Investigator(s): Lr. I
Qsvr.et.
Section, Township, Range.
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etl):
"/Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Local relief (concave, convex, none): t t Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): IR
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Lat: �y QL-I ° ✓
Long: - �` , 9 5 -95`7 '', � Datum: W
Soil Map Unit Name: c P
:://Crayflsh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
NWI classification: t
Are climatic / hydrolog c conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil
or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil
or Hydrology
naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetiand? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes F No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetiand Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
H/ Igh Water Table (A2)/Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
aturation (A3)
"/Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
i/ater
sedlment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6)
:://Crayflsh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes � No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes _,/ No
�No
Depth (inches):
`I`I
/
Saturation Present? Yes
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes V No
includes ca ills fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3y' ) %iC7over Species? Status
1. e- inC LA C �
3. I r Z tPke I.,
4. 4 ' Ll , 4 1 7.4 R a"
5. ,r LAS.. k- i ?a t
6.L/4w)lL., r-1�� �i� b L
Vt- = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover -
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 3" )
1. -Acu 4C.
2. N L7
Pit -
3. 14 vt. L 2N w
4.—ice}� --.1cad, et- k f
5. c_- V
6.
I Z& = Total Cover
Sampling Point: Dn-?-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: c (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: b (B)
Percent of Dominant Species /;
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: CAL) - (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indic,
50% of total cover: U 20% of total cover: ?% /1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: t ) _v Z -Dominance Test is >50%
1. Aflwt, 1 � V
2. Li ri
CA _ 3- Prevalence Index is:53.01
_W _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
= Total Cover
8.
11
0- =Total Cover
50% of total cover: T" 20% of total cover: `7f
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 11 )
2. Jiw;i--A 1-o•iv,.,4Oro I iL // � c
3. V) 9j f /Z
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
_ = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: r 20% of total cover: G Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0
50% of total cover:
Lt° 20% of total cover:
16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3" i )
17
CAL V
2.
V .o 41A,.W 1—f �^ NP J t A
��
FAC V
5.
8.
11
0- =Total Cover
50% of total cover: T" 20% of total cover: `7f
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 11 )
2. Jiw;i--A 1-o•iv,.,4Oro I iL // � c
3. V) 9j f /Z
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
_ = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: r 20% of total cover: G Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the del
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
o- (0 116 3/`
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
to document the Indicator or
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Sand Grains.
Sampling Point: Ple- i
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Version 2 0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SSO P -
Date: 6 -Zd -- 16
Project/Site: f I fk L
Latitude: 36 i-11 1'+ 3
Evaluator: :E 4"/
County: F'r-'J.."
Longitude:
Total Points: /
Stream is at least intermittent 2 6 Z S
Stream Det n (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermltte t Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or Perennial if z 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
02
0 0.
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yes = 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
a
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
Sketch:
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 n
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = Zj
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 0
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 ISD
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 cao.EP
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
F
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 1"45 _1 4J J'
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SOF' Z
Date: 6
ProjectlSite: P _� J ,�e L
Latitude: 3 E . �v (qir "/V - /
Evaluator::Le
County: ��,,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Dete n (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 21; Z
if a 19 or erennial if z 30' b
Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= l2 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
®
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
ZZ)
3
8. Headcuts
0
A 00.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = •}l )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C>
1
2
3
22. Fish
rte
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A 00.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: R&Vt C. -C T2,
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S)2I,^3
Date: ���� -�
Project/Site: h°
Latitude:,
Evaluator: To j��.y Grl1e l�
County: �'�,��
Longitude: -�.Y
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Lt
Stream Determination (cr-_eI_e,`on-ej,,
Ephemeral Intermittenterennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or erennial if z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
01
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
113)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3�
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
CD
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1.5
8. Headcuts
0
1
= 1.5 they = 0
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = A-0--)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 Q 3
14. Leaf litter 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.3 ) �----�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CD
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
ED
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
CD
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; fOBL
= 1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: e,4 4I
Sketch:
,J

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 `for -y
Date: �_Z u-1
ProjecVSite: 1 T ,(,.e C
Latitude:
Evaluator: �a�4 t " j p a vk, ('
County: trr�
Longitude: -
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent z 1✓
Stream Dete rcle one)
Other
if a 19 or erennial if Z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_U__)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
©
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(D
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
d>
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
10
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
W = 0.7 , OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
TW
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
C Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 6 5-
12.
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
olb
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 f00.753
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= 3 . - 4:r )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
rp
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
im1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
W = 0.7 , OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manu
Notes: 1--'l4 , � AJ f4
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 sOr-j_
Date: - (_ (`
Project/Site: f' -r f r+e_ (�
Latitude: 3C yS f� !}6c
Evaluator: ,f ti �'.J o C+►'hC It
County: pev; -1,
Longitude: _ � �� yt:��L
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
2 3 ��
Stream Dete circle one)
Ephemer Intermitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Z )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
( 2}
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0'vf
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
CP
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
i ^
2
3
9. Grade control
0
OXY.,
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0)
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = �J- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 10.
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 , 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 5 ) �'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
61
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
ZD
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
rmp
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
COD
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Qther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: FInVjL,,4 4- f
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
son 6
Date: 6-2(-16
Project/Site: f T Srk G
Latitude: 36 cis SU ) 3 J W
Evaluator: ,r-}� �ltil pav"11
County: Per-(.,
Longitude: - r:e jggjqj
Total Points:
circle one)
Stream Det=Internmitfte
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 17 S 2 S
if z 19 or perennial if z 30' `
Ephemera Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
a
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
a
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
©
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
60>
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
V
2
3
9. Grade control
0
_
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o - 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal=
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 23
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 _ II
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 s = 3
C. Biolonv (Subtotal = '-S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
•
2
WE
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
•
1
S
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
C1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(V
1
2
3
22. Fish
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
60>
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5)
1
1.5
25. Algae
/0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACVV = 0.7t
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified sing, other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
_
Notes: .4,1
i
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 so or, 1
Date: 6-7(-16
Project/Site: f f; t� (,
Latitude: 3` L, y` ti 6f 'Pi
Evaluator: �-�-� ��,� 00, I I
County: F4?rju e,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (c)rc*eee)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perenni I
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z- 19 or erennial if 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
03
1.5
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
13
1
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
e =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
03
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
©
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
3
9. Grade control
0
em1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
CYes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
0111)_�
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = r* •ZS )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
QJ
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
&
1
2
3
22. Fish
CCD
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
kFACW = 0.75
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: L6 J
Sketch:
0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5OF-9
Date: �j - LZ -� la
Project/Site: V T S� �� G
Latitude: 3f , L -I $ 32 3o 't✓
Evaluator: J tiv h � i (
County: F" V o'-
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 22S
Stream Detercircle one)
Ephemeral ntermlttent �erennlal
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= Q- )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
a3
1.5 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
CIO
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
CD
3
9. Grade control
0
e9b
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o -
Yes = 3
Sketch:
"artificial ditches are not rated; see di ussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �_ S' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 02
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = _`(_
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
Q
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
CD
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
®
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 r = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: a
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 -fpr- I
Date: 6-7-Z -(G
ProjectrSite: F T G
Latitude: 3b t(� JgL `N
Evaluator: S+e (,.,n, j, e'vi-C
County: CevJ° h
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determ' n (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
nterm tt Ephemeral t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if z 30*
2)
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
d
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(rl�
3
8. Headcuts
0
W =
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discyy��sions in manual
B. Hvdrolotry (Subtotal = (0 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes = 3
1
C. Biologv (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
ZD
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
(1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
M2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
W =
; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 4
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 mr-1 °
Date: 6 -Z3 - 16
Project/Site: r -T �� L
Latitude: 36 w % o f-1 „/
Evaluator: s} t,,r O avn-e (
County: f t „J', L'
Longitude:-
ongitude:_Total
TotalPoints:
Stream is at least intermittent Z�
31.
Stream Determination (cy�
Ephemeral Intermittent 11 erenma
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = \'' - )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 rift
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
Q
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
e = 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
55
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
Sketch:
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc ssions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
(2)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 rift
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e = 3
1.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = L'ZS )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 n
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 2
3
22. Fish
00
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 -Dr, -
Date: C-13-16
Project/Site: V 1 f,„k L
Latitude: 36 1-110 t( o' °,/
Evaluator: A -p kft .J �
County: ?-t v1ot.'
Longitude: _ �� f
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent `Z�. ZS
Stream Dete on ircle one)
Ephemeral Ikt!2!itte0 Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or erennial if z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= Z )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
es = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
n
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see di s ssions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 0 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
6P 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 49 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1§0 1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
1.5
r17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5-,15- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
CD
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
Al
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 for -1 2 -
Date: C - Z 2 -- l G
Project/site: ��[ J , �,
Latitude: 36,. 4 cl 2 2.?0 "A/
Evaluator: Lty-�t„ J PC, vv,O
County: P{ �f��
Longitude: � � . cl� w7
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2
Stream Dete ii (circle one)
Ephemeral termitten Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
C�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
es =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
iT>
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
t)
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
v
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.e
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = �'
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
F116.
7. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = `i ,7 I' )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
ry
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
6)
1
2
3
22. Fish
&
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC -
; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SD�` i 3
Date: 6-77 -f b
Project/Site: Q 1 J, G
Latitude: 36 , q 8� q �; o`l/
Evaluator: S �-� �, w/ 0cv1'r 1)
County: PINJ b r,.%
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ,'L�
Stream Determination (cir
Ephemeral Intermitten erenni
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_-U-)
Absent
Weak
Mo rate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
Yes = 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
=
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Q
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HArolociv (Subtotal = q- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
C�
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = (a'IS)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambedAC
=
• OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: f fit Hi IS
Sketch:
J
W

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 `Sop N
Date: 6 -L3 -I(
Project/Site: P -T S -;+e C
Latitude: 36, 9 et y' .o 3°r/
Evaluator: L"e l (
County: plevio u,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 'L'
Stream Dete (circle one)
n
Ephemeral ntermittePerennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-\!,_)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Yes = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
V
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(0)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
n
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
0
0
C0.53
1
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
(-No5-
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual --'-�
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal= s )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolow (Subtotal = Sr )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
a0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
•?)
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish ZP0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
03)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
ther =
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I f
Sketch:
..1

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
smr,- is
Date: to -'Zme
Project/Site: (-I f;k (-
Latitude: 36 Lf7 to (}r
Evaluator: j' ���,s �Glvh a If
County: f evloti'
Longitude: - q .
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 L� �-f
Stream Deter ion (circle one)
Ephemeral I termi nt Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or erennial if z 30•
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_!-L__)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
d15
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = q )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 m
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
e =
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal= 4.1-;_ .1-S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
M
1 2
3
22. Fish
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW - 0.75' OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manus .
Notes:
ti
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 10 P_ I C
Date:
Project/Site: ►1 c
Latitude:
Evaluator: Lie 6...j 10c r hc I t
County:' Q {�
Longitude: -
t
�
2
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 ? , 2s
Stream Det (circle one)
Ephemer Intermitten Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or erennial if Z 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= IA )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
C Yes= 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
(n) 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
®
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
A = 0-75),OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
O -V
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 6's- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 r<n>
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C Yes= 3
1
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = -) • 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
n1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
(n) 1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
®
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A = 0-75),OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 4
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 lar " I -
Date:
Project/Site: e j j;•� L
Latitude: Z. L1G` `.11/
Evaluator: ��,� ��vv,tll
County: 1 Pvfo.,
Longitude:
Total Points:
stream is at least intermittent ? Z �'
Stream Dete ' tion (circle one)
Ephemera nterm ent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if Z 30`
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_A) )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
a3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
"I
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
CACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see disgussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = G S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
a)
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1CaEb
2
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = `I.aT )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: G ,I al5"1 a
t
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
f0f - 18
Date: - Z -' `
Project/Site: T I; k
Latitude: 16, q Ile cG ` N
Evaluator: =:fJ 0-a ,µp ()
County: �%�,,, ��
Longitude: -IS I `It 613 `
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 , 2 S
Stream Dete (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermltte t Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 orperennial if Z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-AL_)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0.5
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
d
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
No = 0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
CP
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1G
•
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology( Subtotal_ _ i
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
CD
1
2
2
3
•
14. Leaf titter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology Subtotal = • I -r )
No = 0
es =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
it
2
0)
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
it
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CP
2
•
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
•
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians 1 0 1 C9.A9 1 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.7 , OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 31 of manual.
Notes: 14 A 1
Sketch:
J

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Str- I
Date: _ 2
Project/Site: ff'_T J► C,
Latitude:
Evaluator: j, p -r 0a. r,,e h
County: kvjo k.
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 S
Stream Dete (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or erennial if 2:30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= S 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
i 1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
d
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
n
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
®
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
JACW = 0.75. OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
El
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 Q
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = (e•'?S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
m
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
<E5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
®
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
JACW = 0.75. OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: f c- _4 Gf JZS
Sketch:
(,J

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 , fdQ17, -1 C
Date: Z S
Project/Site: F-1 -r,)-c L
Latitude: 3 C 14 l 11 -2 Ll `.A/
Evaluator: ��
County: �tvzaL,
Longitude:,
Total Points:
Stream Deter ' (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2I I. `
if 2:19 or erennial if z 30" /
Ephemera ntermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = k � ' J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
W
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1W
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
01�
0 0.
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yes = 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
0.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
= 0.7 , OBL = 1.5
3
8. Headcuts
0
- ' T '
2
3
9. Grade control
0
C21-5421
-
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
CWS '= 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 CD
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0.5
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal= S • ?�f )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
I/
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0Cl)2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish _
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambedACW
= 0.7 , OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
- ' T '
Not�jrl5��..; f 2,1
-
Sketch:

Nf lllWfl CtrPam ldi-ntiflea tinn Fnrm Vprcinn 4.11 -+Yf - Z %
Date: Z S `
Project/Site: ¢'"� fl
Latitude: 36, 110 ` 21i'tj
Evaluator: S �,��
County: fe%, , C.
Longitude: _ 1 t.) ZZ
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c)fctevne)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 31 ZS
Ephemeral Intermittent erenni I
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 or perennial if Z30*
0
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
12. Presence of Baseflow
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
%bOrganic
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
• 2
CD
0
B. Hydrology Subtotal
•
1
0
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 _
2
•
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
debris lines or piles
0 0
1
1.5
%bOrganic
Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C_ Rinloov iSuhtntal = '-�.7_S '1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
• 2
CD
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
•
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 0
a 1 1
2 I
2
• '
•
22. Fish
-) 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
_ 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: _1 ►,� Z
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 d pr- 2 2
Date: Z 1
Project/Site: 1 .f i C
Latitude:.
Evaluator: A -e,
County: f?
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 'LS`
Stream Determi (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if? 19 or perennial if Z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__U6_)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1M
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
c
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
A =
2
3
9. Grade control
0
CTjP
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- arnticiai ancnes are not rated; see cliscussions in manual ----------
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q-
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 03
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
s =
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = s )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
d
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
iD
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
rM
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
A =
, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: '(74
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Jpr"Z1
Date: Z _ j
ProjectiSite: f -k f .� L
Latitude: ?c L.I
Evaluator: �PGye
County: �.',�,f,�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
ifZ 19 or perennial if 2t 30*
Stream Deter circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial 1
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
MW.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
CID
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0 1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Yes =
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
m
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
eACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
631
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = '-)- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 CD
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
2
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
1
U. blolow (Subtotal = S • _3 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
m7
1
2
3
22. Fish
®
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1(0>
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
®
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
eACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I cA 41 2 .
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 s "_ rZ (-I
Date: ,_ 'L -' �,
A.
Project/Site: i S- L
Latitude: 3 C (-Is 16 1 ?
Evaluator:f a vv-(
County: fe� f�
Longitude: _ ? y
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 21 Z-1
Stream Determination (cpvIe-or:e)
Ephemeral IntermittentBrenn l
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
30*
if t 19 orperennial if 2:30-
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =_L%)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
CP
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(y
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(1)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
rp
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
a
3
8. Headcuts
0
CW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = -L-)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
(2�
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 Q
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.51n
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = (0 25- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
�
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
<n>
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
CW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I c - -t �✓ J'
Sketch:

SETT
WEB HCST'Nrs
I=
i
VVOOD DDALE
1: 1 971) Feet
Person
Printed July 12, 2016
See Below for Disclaimer
Lakes
El
Roads
City of Roxboro
Townships
❑ <all otherwaluess
❑ ALLENSVILLE
❑ BUSHY FORK
❑ CUM[INGHA.M
❑ FLAT RIVER
❑ HOLLCMA.Y
❑ MT. TIRZAH
❑ OLIVE HILL
❑ ROXBORO
❑ 4NOODS.DALE

OBJECTID Calculated Acreage Tax Parcel PIN Number
569 850.309149626196 0909-00-26-0057.000
Tax Parcel Record Number
618
Tax Parcel Owner Secondary
Tax Parcel Map Number
A46 10
Sale Value
0
Other Bldg Value
3644
Current Value
1068168
Deed Book
818
Zipcode
27573
Billing Address
31 REAMS AVE
Description
DEF/T 875 & 43/100 ACRES
Land Value
1064524
Plat Book
Townships
WOODSDALE
Deed Page
152
Tax Parcel Owner Name
WAGSTAFF LINDSAY JR/JOHN & OTH
City/State
ROXBORO NC
Deeded Acreage
875.43
Building Value
0
Tax Parcel Address
EDWIN ROBERTSON RD
SALE DATE
10/1/2012
NOTICE: Recently, we have had several users report browser compatibility issues when trying to access our GIS website. Typically, the problem stems from users who have
recently upgraded to the Windows 8 operating system or a new version of Internet Explorer. We were able to resolve this issue by directing users to the Internet Explore
Compatibility View tool. This link is to Microsoft's "How To" forthe tool: http://windows.microsoft.cam/en-US/intemet- explore r/products/ie-9/features/corn patibility-viev
Ifthis does not solve the problem feel free to contact us at the number listed on our main page. Welcome to the Person County GIS Website. ConnectGIS has been prepares
or the inventory of real propertyfound within Person County, and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records. Users of GIS system are notified that the
aforementioned public information sources should be consulted for verification of the information in this system. Person County, Mobile 311, ConnectGIS assume no lega
responsibilitvfor the information in this system. Grid is based on the NC state plane coordinate system, 1983 NAD.

&CONNECTGIS
'IVES HOSTI+11
FDWIN RC -BURT.()'
1 :1190 Feet
Person
Printed July 12, 2016
See Below for Disclaimer
Lakes
11
Roads
City of Roxboro

OBJECTID
Calculated Acreage
Tax Parcel PIN Number
347
473.344402825714
0909-00-40-4723.000
Tax Parcel Record Number
Zipcode
Tax Parcel Owner Name
371
27573
WAGSTAFF LINDSAY T JR & JOHN H
Tax Parcel Owner Secondary
Billing Address
City/State
31 REAMS AVE
ROXBORO NC
Tax Parcel Map Number
Description
Deeded Acreage
A46 6
DEF/T 475 & 55/100 AC
475.55
Sale Value
Land Value
Building Value
800000
624559
0
Other Bldg Value
Plat Book
Tax Parcel Address
6800
1/2
COUNTRY CLUB RD
Current Value
Townships
SALE DATE
631359
WOODSDALE
1/16/2003
Deed Book
Deed Page
411
382
NOTICE: Recently, we have had several users report browser compatibility issues when trying to access our GIS website.
Typically, the problem stems from users who have
recently upgraded to the Windows 8 operating system or a new version of Internet Explorer. We were able to resolve
this issue by directing users to the Internet Explore
Compatibility View tool. This link is to Microsoft's "How
To" forthe tool: http://windows.microsoft.cam/en-US/intemet- explore r/products/ie-9/features/corn patibility-viev
Ifthis does not solve the problem feel free to contact us at the number listed on our main page. Welcome to the Person County GIS Website. ConnectGIS has been prepares
or the inventory of real propertyfound within Person County, and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other
public records. Users of GIS system are notified that the
aforementioned public information sources should
be consulted for verification of the information in this system.
Person County, Mobile 311, ConnectGIS assume no lega
responsibilitvfor the information in this system. Grid
is based on the NC state plane coordinate system, 1983 NAD.

APPENDIX C
SCOPING LETTERS & AGENCY RESPONSE

ErECS L I LLP J effing Etre Stan dard for ServicehmmmS ..
I.. Geotechnical • Construction Materals - Environmental - Facilities Firm
July 22, 2014
Mr. Michael Solomon
Timmons Group
8642 West Market Street, Suite 136
Greensboro, NC 27409
Reference: Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
Dear Mr. Solomon,
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to provide our results of the Limited NEPA Database
Review conducted for the above referenced site. Our services were provided in accordance
with ECS Proposal #: 06-17526-17527.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Project Trace is located south of the intersection of Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
in Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina. The site consists of an approximate 675.55 -acre
portion of two larger parent parcels totaling 1,350.98 -acres. According to the Person County
Online GIS Database website, the Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) are: (0909-00-26-0057 —
875.43 acres) and (0909-00-40-4723 — 475.55 acres). The site consists of wooded land and
agricultural fields. Single-family residences are located along Country Club Road and Edwin
Robertson Road, within the site boundary. Agricultural structures are located on the southeastern
portion of the site. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map,
unnamed tributaries to Marlow Creek are located on the eastern portion of the site and unnamed
tributaries to Story's Creek are located on the western portion of the site. Three ponds are
depicted on-site. Structures are depicted on the northern, central, and southern portions of the
site. A powerline easement transects the northern portion of the site.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary threatened and endangered species
determination and a preliminary historic and archaeological resources review for the site. ECS
personnel conducted the field reconnaissance on May 19, 2014.
PRELIMINARY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES DETERMINATION
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973. The purpose of the ESA is to
protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. It is
administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Commerce Department's
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The USFWS has primary responsibility for terrestrial
and freshwater organisms, while the responsibilities of NMFS are mainly marine wildlife.
Under the ESA, species may be listed as either endangered or threatened. "Endangered"
means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
9001 Glenwobd Aven ue. Ralelgh. NC 7617-7505 - T; 919-86 1 -90 10 - F- DIA 1491 I-.w•rr.ecslirrrlted Iona
fief-4dr1Ser. ,Pk1ti: 11F1- SCSfd-rmai.HIis - F SFV"M.!kG - ri`_SM4A%VW !1c - F SMkfnffl!E?.IIIt - - Terns,IIP

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
"Threatened" means a species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. All
species of plants and animals, except pest insects, are eligible for listing as endangered or
threatened. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species to include subspecies,
varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments.
ECS reviewed the USFWS Endangered Species Database to identify federally protected
threatened and endangered species in Person County, North Carolina. The following federally
protected threatened and endangered species were identified in Person County, North Carolina.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Record Status
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Invertebrate
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Obscure
BGPA= Bald Eagle Protection Act
Species/Habitat Description
Bald Eagle
E = Endangered
Description: Distinguished by a white head and white tail feathers, bald eagles are powerful,
brown birds that may weigh 14 pounds and have a wingspan of 8 feet. Male eagles are smaller,
weighing as much as 10 pounds and have a wingspan of 6 feet. Sometimes confused with
Golden Eagles, Bald Eagles are mostly dark brown until they are four to five years old and
acquire their characteristic coloring.
Habitat: Bald Eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple
food. Bald Eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals
and carrion. Bald Eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their
habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the
birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Conclusions: The site consists mostly of agricultural fields and wooded land. Three ponds are
located on-site. Streams are located throughout the site which drains to Marlowes Creek and
Storys Creek, located along the eastern and western site boundaries. The stream features
varied from ephemeral drainage patterns with no bed and bank, to large perennial streams with
a well defined bed and bank. The ephemeral and intermittent stream features on-site had no to
little baseflow, minimal sinuosity, and a silt substrate. These features varied from one to three
feet in width and two inches to two feet in depth. The larger perennial stream features on-site
had little to moderate baseflow, moderate to high sinuosity, and a silty -sand -gravel -pebble -rocky
substrate. These features varied from two to fifteen feet in width and one foot to eight feet in
depth. Several wetland areas are located adjacent to these stream features located throughout
the site. Large bodies of water and a steady food support base are not believed to be present in
the surrounding area.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
Based on our observations and knowledge of the Bald Eagle, it does not appear that suitable
habitat for this species is present on the site.
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Description: The dwarf wedgemussel is a small bivalve, rarely exceeding 45 millimeters in
length. Clean young shells are usually greenish-brown with green rays. As the animal ages,
the shell color becomes obscured by diatoms or mineral deposits and appears black or brown.
The shell is thin but does thicken somewhat with age, especially toward the anterior end. The
anterior end is rounded while the posterior end is angular forming a point near the posterior -
ventral margin. The ventral margin is slightly curved. The nacre is bluish -white, appearing
whiter in the thicker anterior end. The most distinctive shell character of the dwarf
wedgemussel is the arrangement of the lateral teeth. There are two lateral teeth in the right
valve and one in the left valve. The typical arrangement for most freshwater mussel species
consists of two lateral teeth in the left valve and one in the right valve. The incurrent and
excurrent apertures and their associated papillae are usually white. The foot and other organs
are also white. Maximum age for the dwarf wedgemussel is around twelve years. The species
is a bradytictic breeder, meaning that females become gravid in the early fall and glochidia are
released by mid -spring. The tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), johnny darter
(Etheostoma nigrum), and mottled sulpin (Cottus bairdi) have been identified as hosts for the
dwarf wedgemussel. An anadromous fish may also serve as a host species but this has not
been documented for the dwarf wedgemussel in the southern portion of its range.
Habitat: The dwarf wedgemussel appears to be a generalist in terms of its preference for
stream size, substrate and flow conditions — it inhabits small streams less than five meters wide
to large rivers more than 100 meters wide; it is found in a variety of substrate types including
clay, sand, gravel and pebble, and sometimes in silt depositional areas near banks; and it
usually inhabits hydrologically stable areas, including very shallow water along stream banks
and under root mats, but it has also been found at depths of 25 feet in the Connecticut River.
Dwarf wedgemussels are often patchily distributed in rivers.
Conclusion: The site consists mostly of agricultural fields and wooded land. Three ponds are
located on-site. Streams are located throughout the site which drains to Marlowes Creek and
Storys Creek, located along the eastern and western site boundaries. The stream features
varied from ephemeral drainage patterns with no bed and bank, to large perennial streams with
well defined bed and bank. The ephemeral and intermittent stream features on-site had no to
little baseflow, minimal sinuosity, and a silt substrate. These features varied from one to three
feet in width and two inches to two feet in depth. The larger perennial stream features on-site
had little to heavy baseflow, moderate to high sinuosity, and a silty -sand -gravel -pebble -rocky
substrate. These features varied from two to fifteen feet in width and one foot to eight feet in
depth. Several wetland areas are located adjacent to these stream features located throughout
the site.
Based on our observations and knowledge of the Dwarf Wedgemussel, suitable habitat for this
species may be present on site. Other Federally listed threatened and endangered species
have not been identified in Person County by the USFWS.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
Based on our assessment of the on-site conditions, potential habitat for the Dwarf
Wedgemussel may exist along the western and eastern property boundaries.
PRELIMINARY HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES REVIEW
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was created by the United States government in
1966 under Section 101 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The purposes of
SHPO include surveying and recognizing historic properties, reviewing nominations for
properties to be included in the National Register of Historic Places, reviewing undertakings for
the impact on the properties as well as supporting federal organizations, state and local
governments, and the private sector.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary historic and archaeological resources review. The
scope of work included a field reconnaissance to identify potential historic structures, a review of
aerial photographs and a review of the SHPO online GIS mapping.
The site reconnaissance was conducted by ECS on May 19, 2014. The site consists of
agricultural fields and wooded land. The site is bound to the north by wooded land and
agricultural fields, beyond which is Big Johns Store Road. The site is bound to the east by
agricultural fields and wooded land. The site is bound to the south by wooded land. The site is
bound to the west by wooded land and agricultural fields.
ECS reviewed aerial photographs of the site and immediately surrounding properties for
evidence of former usage which may indicate potential environmental issues. The aerial
photographs were obtained from the USDA, Google Earth, and the Person County GIS
Department website. The aerial photographs reviewed were dated 1955, 1975, 1994, 1998,
2005, 2010, and 2013. Aerial photographs dated prior to 1955 were not available for review.
The ECS review is dependent on the quality and scale of the photographs.
1955 Aerial Photograph- The site appears to be primarily undeveloped, wooded land and
agricultural land. Several apparent single-family residences and/or apparent agricultural
structures appear to be present on the northern portion of the site. Edwin Robertson Road is
present north of the site, and Country Club Road bisects the site. Surrounding properties appear
as undeveloped, wooded land and agricultural
1975, 1994, 1998, 2005, 2010, and 2013 Aerial Photographs- The site appears to be similar to
the previous 1955 aerial photograph. Apparent single family residences appear present north
and northeast of the site, along Edwin Robertson Road. The remaining surrounding properties
appear similar to the previous 1955 aerial photograph.
ECS reviewed the online SHPO GIS database (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/). As depicted on
Figure 3, the database review did not identify Indian religious sites, historic structures or historic
places on the site.
Based on our site visit, the review of historical aerial photographs and the online SHPO GIS, we
did not identify significant architectural or archaeological resources on the subject site (Figure
3). ECS is not aware of a proposed sale, transfer, or lease of historic properties on the site or
within the general vicinity of the site.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
ECS composed letter requests addressed to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP), the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated May 9, 2014, to determine if the subject site is
located in the immediate vicinity of registered sightings or habitats for endangered species.
ECS received a response from Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner, with the NC
Natural Heritage Program, on June 6, 2014, which states that the Natural Heritage Program
shows the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is located in the eastern portion of the
proposed project area, and there are records for the following rare species in close proximity of
the project area: Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil, Northern Gray Treefrog, Rock Buttercup and Notched
Rainbow. There are two occurrence records for Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil in close proximity: one
is located along the powerline right-of-way on the southern boundary of the project area, just
west of the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area boundary (and just south of the
proposed project boundary), and the other is located just north of Edwin Robertson Road.
Northern Gray Treefrog and Rock Buttercup are also documented as occurring just north of
Edwin Robertson Road and the proposed project area. The occurrence of Notched Rainbow is
located upstream and downstream of Edwin Robertson Road in Story's Creek. The Marlowe
Creek Slopes natural heritage area is important for the Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype)
natural community that has been mapped along Marlowe Creek, and also for the rich diversity
present on the slopes and the wildflowers present. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
ECS received a response from Ms. Kathy Matthews for Mr. Pete Benjamin, Field Supervisor,
with USFWS on July 11, 2014. The letter states that based on the information provided, and
other information available, it appears that the project as currently proposed will not impact
federally listed species or their habitats. Therefore, they believe that the requirements under
Section 7(a)(2) of the Act are fulfilled. However, the Service is concerned about the potential
impacts the proposed action might have on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly
susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken
to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species, including implementing directional boring methods
and stringent sediment and erosion control measures. An erosion and sedimentation control
plan should be submitted to and approved by the North Carolina Division of Land Resources,
Land Quality Section prior to construction. Erosion and sedimentation controls should be
installed and maintained between the construction site and any nearby down -gradient surface
waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and
creeks adjacent to the project site. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
ECS received a response from Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley for Ms. Ramona Bartos, SHPO
Representative, on June 12, 2014. The letter states that the project tract consists of a large
ridge system located between two second to third order streams. This system contains relatively
long linear ridgetops, ridgetoes, and several likely springheads. The topography is consistent
with other settings within the region that contain a high frequency of archaeological resources,
particularly prehistoric sites. While there are no previously recorded archaeological sites noted
within the tract at present, the area has never been surveyed for archaeological resources.
Given the nature of this landscape and the high probability of prehistoric remains, a Phase I
archaeological survey of the tract is recommended.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, the applicant shall
arrange for an archaeological survey of the entire project area (approximately 675.55 acres).
The purpose of this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations
regarding the eligibility status of each site in terms of the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP). If a site is determined to be eligible for the NRHP the applicant shall determine whether
the site will be adversely affected by the project activities; and, if so, develop and implement an
appropriate mitigation plan. Two copies of all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one
copy of the North Carolina site forms, should be forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology
through this office for review and comment as soon as they are available and in advance of any
construction or ground disturbance activities. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
CONCLUSIONS
ECS have conducted a preliminary threatened and endangered species determination and a
preliminary historic and archaeological resources review for the site. Please note that our
services did not include detailed studies for threatened and endangered species or historic and
archaeological resources. However, based on our observations and knowledge of the site, the
database review and correspondence from representatives of the North Carolina National
Heritage Program and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, potential habitat for the Federally
endangered Dwarf Wedgemussel, may exist on-site. Marlow Creek is located on the eastern
property boundary of the site and Story's Creek is located on the western property boundary.
The Natural Heritage Program identified the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is
located in the eastern portion of the proposed project area. Records for the following rare
species in close proximity of the project area include: Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil, Northern Gray
Treefrog, Rock Buttercup and Notched Rainbow. It is ECS' opinion that potential habitat may
exist on-site. A full biological assessment of the site will need conducted by a qualified biologist
to determine if these species are located on-site.
To satisfy recommendations provided by NCSHPO for historic and archaeological resources on-
site, ECS recommends that additional assessment be performed on-site.
ECS has subcontracted with Archeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc. (ACC) to conduct
the preliminary field assessment. In addition to the recommendations provided by SHPO,
additional assessment will include coordination with the local Historical society and the local
tribe of Native Americans. The objective will be to determine which areas have the greatest
potential for the presence of archaeological sites and to focus later more intensive survey on
these areas, if needed. The results of those services will be provided in a separate Letter
Report along with our findings and recommendations.
In order to protect aquatic resources, vegetated buffers should be maintained around water
bodies on the site and on the downstream side of the project. In addition, best management
practices for erosion and sedimentation control should be followed during construction.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project #: 06: 21626
CLOSING
ECS appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (919) 861-
9910 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Cory Darnell Brian E. Maas, REM
Environmental Project Manager Environmental Principal
Attachments:
Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Aerial Map
Figure 3 — SHPO Map
Agency Correspondence
Historic Aerials
Photographs

'V
AJ
J
'tz
7
p J %I
10' 1
J
..LJ rJ{M1- . . . . ....
e 7
%)
1406
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
United States Geological Survey
7.5 - Minute Series Topographic Map: Project Trace
Roxboro, NC Quadrangle; Created: 1982; Country Club Rd and Edwin Robertson Rd
Olive Hill, NC Quadrangle; Created: 1968, Roxboro, Person County, NC
Revised: 1994
Contour Interval = 10 feet ECS Project #06.21626

1 �� ; ��- �
i � � �-
' �� � 5�
.f
�. ,� r ,
� ��,# F .
� { r
�- �
__� IF •� �'• �
�_ � T
_ r ^-F �
�•
F, � -
z _ �

- �, r��•�� �•R.. r .: M1 '�h � mo�o.+j�~'�
111116
SOURCE: FIGURE 3
SHPO MAP
State Historic Preservation Office Project Trace
Online GIS Country Club Rd and Edwin Robertson Rd
Roxboro, Person County, NC
Scale: 1" = 500'
ECS Project #06.21626

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
June 6, 2014
Mr. Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
[e-mail]
RE: Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, Person County, NC
ECS Project No. 06.21626
Dear Mr. Darnell:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database shows that the
Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is located in the eastern portion of the proposed project
area, and there are records for the following rare species in close proximity of the project area:
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
ACCURACY
STATE STATUS* FEDERAL STATUS*
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil
High
SC -v FSC
Hyla versicolor
Northern Gray Treefrog
Medium
SR ---
Ranunculus micrantha
Rock Buttercup
Medium
SR -P ---
Villosa constricta
j Notched Rainbow
j Medium I
SC ---
*For status definitions, please seethe Help and Definitions document at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/database-search.
There are two occurrence records for Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil in close proximity: one is located along
the powerline right-of-way on the southern boundary of the project area, just west of the Marlowe
Creek Slopes natural heritage area boundary (and just south of the proposed project boundary), and the
other is located just north of Edwin Robertson Road. Northern Gray Treefrog and Rock Buttercup are
also documented as occurring just north of Edwin Robertson Road and the proposed project area. The
occurrence of Notched Rainbow is located upstream and downstream of Edwin Robertson Road in
Storys Creek.
Attached is a description and map of the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area from the Inventory
of Significant Natural Areas in Person County, NC (LeGrand 2007), based on field work conducted by
NCNHP in 2006. This portion of the Marlowe Creek Slopes natural heritage area is important for the
Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype) natural community that has been mapped along Marlowe Creek,
and also for the rich diversity present on the slopes and the wildflowers present.
Please note that the use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field
surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species or important
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, Person County, NC
ECS Project No. 06.21626
June 6, 2014
Page 2
natural communities, or known occurrences of rare species or natural communities. If rare species are
found, please contact us so that we may update our records.
Feel free to contact me at 919-707-8629 or [e-mail] if you have questions or need
additional information. Sincerely,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

V
Marlowe Creek Slopes
c) \
Person County Natural Areas Inventory
Roxboro quad
Scale 1:24,000 NC NHP January 2007`
Q
� J v� � , .� r✓ I � � > � �� ,
V
-r /�� s � � - `) ��� _ F ? i ,/l \ fes/ (` 1t F �• , `. r �•Sk {\ �
V
a � �} � \ fi - �� -. a� `�L �-\ �• � � Jai � /. / � � � / �>✓ l ���V �r /
qa'�
✓ _ ! >, l - n.
V1
1 � ��v ) � ���h`-/ � l I'�� It �• ) -tli/ -�i / � ��,A�� ,�. ,
j ��`_'1 F�l�� IJ^J. 1 ��l���k) ^ �` \ �`` l r`-- r .(!' �� ,�` � tt �� �����Y�i/7 \� 1 ��'�f `� \ \ "�✓ ~� ` ✓�
J \✓ \\�... ,� i,. � (F,l�/r i`
r
' j��j ,+�rsrb �
1� lA- U f, :_ v /' / ���• J �� 1( rc / ; a:, � /�•
• I C
77
NN-
7 'rf` � I �. r r �, \�. �'r./ ✓% :i1� vJ �� i .. dr l�' �� //F.1 ! � � i�'I
`�"�' �, �_ // � � ( - I �/ V' �%I l { / iL. -� ��,/ /�' � f� � ( % r• .. .. � V� fr \I „r �Srir-�'),,,�
.+>, vV r v � Vl �. ° ti .; / � '•�`, (,1 f/ �s v �/ 1 v' // v `J ,� ♦ /rC�. F � , Y (i �� --''vq,
VioIter
f /"-`'J r'J � `'• � c _ `� tt1 �\ 1 ('' 535�� -._. ., -' �' - � / lh r l � \ ,/ 0 � , I �J , � � � y i '`
�Y
`~Il!/ vy � � r +' c ! • /� ��, � �'/�', + v / �� / A v I r °�• + I See Figure 4 for landscape -scale map
>'• ! r / �_:";-..._�' ..''/ Jam, r. _ - .

Person County Natural Areas Inventory
MARLOWE CREEK SLOPES
Site Number: 10 Size: 227 acres
Site Significance: Regional Quadrangle: Roxboro
Ownership: private
SIGNIFICANT FEATURES: This natural area contains perhaps the most extensive series of rich
slopes with wildflowers of any site in the county, with excellent examples of Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest natural community. However, it is a very diverse site, containing scarce
communities as well, such as Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade and Basic Mesic Forest, and it also has
a few examples of Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff, as well. Several Watch List plants occur
in the site.
LANDSCAPE RELATIONSHIPS: The natural area abuts Hagers Mountain, just to the east.
Lying downstream by about 0.3 mile (to the north) is the Marlowe Creek Bluff natural area. Farther
downstream, about 0.9 mile to the north, is the southern end of the Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek
Swamp.
SITE DESCRIPTION: Along Marlowe Creek and tributaries on the western side of the creek are
extensive mature hardwood forests. The slopes and bluffs are predominantly covered in Mesic
Mixed Hardwood Forest natural community. These slopes lie mainly on acidic soils, but a few areas
are mapped as Wilkes soil, which is somewhat circumneutral, where Basic Mesic Forest is present.
The former community has American beech (Fagus grandifolia) as a common canopy tree, as is
northern red oak (Quercus rubra). The uncommon maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum) is present,
as is a good diversity of spring -flowering herbs, such as foamflower (Tiarella cordifolia), mayapple
(Podophyllum peltatum), and liverleaf (Hepatica americana). In some locales, Christmas fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides) is abundant, and black cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) is often
common.
One small area of east -facing slopes contain species such as the Watch List leatherwood (Dirca
palustris), wild hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens), and goat's -beard (Aruncus dioicus), which
indicate Basic Mesic Forest. The floodplain of Marlowe Creek is somewhat wide on the western
side, and there is a decent -quality Piedmont Small Stream Forest. Tuliptree (Liriodendron
tulipifera) is very common in the canopy, and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) is numerous.
Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) is a very common shrub, indicating rich soils. One species of interest
in this floodplain is Pursh's phacelia (Phacelia purshii), a range extension to the east, as other state
records are from the mountain region. Leatherwood also grows in the floodplain.
The natural area has a narrow ridge that contains an excellent but small example of Dry Oak -
Hickory Forest with considerable herb diversity. White oak (Q. alba) is the dominant tree, but some
post oak (Q. stellata) is present. The locally scarce eastern featherbells (Stenanthium gramineum)
is scattered here. Early lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum) is a dominant shrub, and maple -
M.

leafviburnum (Viburnum acerifolium) and deerberry (Vacciniumstamineum) are very common also.
Several species of legumes, such as a few species of tick -trefoils (Desmodium spp.), are present in
the herb layer. The Watch List American shinleaf (Pyrola americana) grows on a mesic slope
nearby. A few slopes contain Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest, with mockernut hickory (Carya
alba), American beech, northern red oak, and red maple (Acer rubrum) among the canopy trees.
Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), flowering dogwood (Cornus Florida), and black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) are understory trees. Some blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) are present in the shrub layer,
but the herb layer is rather poor.
In the southern part of the natural area, Marlowe Creek runs through very rocky terrain, with no
floodplain. These rocky and steep slopes are covered with mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), often
in very dense tangles; these are Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff natural communities. One
narrow east -west ridge east of the creek has a very dry and glade -like south -facing slope. This is
the poorly -known Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade. There are scattered rocks, and the ground is rather
hard; some eastern red cedars (Juniperus virginiana) are present. There are few shrubs, and the herb
layer is very diverse, with grasses, and a number of legumes and other forbs. Dittany (Cunila
origanoides) is quite common. Other notable herbs include fire pink (Silene virginica), striped
gentian (Gentiana villosa), little ladies -tresses (Spiranthes tuberoses), and cornel-leaf aster
(Doellingeria infzrma).
NOTE: Most of the eastern side of Marlowe Creek was not surveyed because of the lack of access.
Thus, the eastern boundary of the natural area is speculative and based solely on aerial photos.
Several powerlines that cut across upper slopes above Marlowe Creek, to the south of the natural
area, contain rare plants; however, as these powerlines do not bisect the site, they are excluded from
the natural area.
PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT: Most of the site lies in a single private ownership; this
land is leased to a hunt club for hunting during the fall, winter, and spring. As a result, some
ephemeral spring wildflowers, not seen during the June surveys, are presumably present in the area
and might add to the importance of the natural area. There is no known formal protection of the
natural area. Because of its rather extensive size, it is a high priority for protection, such as with
conservation easements. The area, coupled with the adjacent Hagers Mountain, would be suitable
in acreage for a local park or nature preserve. Little management is needed. Timber harvest, which
occurs to the west of the site, should remain outside the boundary of the natural area, as exotic plants
such as Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum) rapidly invade rich soil sites such as this. A
few jeep/ATV roads run along ridges toward the creek. It is hoped that no new roads or trails will
be made.
NATURAL COMMUNITIES: Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest, Basic Mesic Forest (Slope variant),
Dry Oak -Hickory Forest (Piedmont Upland variant), Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest (Piedmont
Upland variant), Acidic Piedmont Bluff Glade, Piedmont/Coastal Plain Heath Bluff, Piedmont Small
Stream Forest.

RARE PLANTS: Watch List — leatherwood (Dirca palustris), American shinleaf (Pyrola
americana).
RARE ANIMALS: None known.
REFERENCES:
LeGrand, H. 2006a. Site report: Marlowe Creek Slopes. N.C. Natural Heritage Program, Office
of Conservation and Community Affairs, DENR, Raleigh.
LeGrand, H. 2006b. Site report: Marlowe Creek Slopes — east of creek. N.C. Natural Heritage
Program, Office of Conservation and Community Affairs, DENR, Raleigh.

-r✓ u..t�
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 11, 2014
Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
Re: Project Trace- Person County, NC
Dear Mr. Darnell:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
t The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
�j
t144
P e Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
M
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

` Qu ,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
June 12, 2014
Cory Darnell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Project Trace, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro, 06-21626, Person County,
ER 14-1122
Dear Mr. Darnell:
Thank you for your letter of May 22, 2014. We have reviewed the project referenced above and offer the
following comments.
The project tract consists of a large ridge system located between two second to third order streams. This
system contains relatively long linear ridgetops, ridgetoes, and several likely springheads. The topography is
consistent with other settings within the region that contain a high frequency of archaeological resources,
particularly prehistoric sites. While there are no previously recorded archaeological sites noted within the tract
at present, the area has never been surveyed for archaeological resources. Given the nature of this landscape
and the high probability of prehistoric remains, we recommend a Phase I archaeological survey of the tract. As
a result, we recommend the following conditions for this application:
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, the applicant shall arrange
for an archaeological survey of the entire project area (approximately 675.55 acres). The purpose of
this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding the eligibility
status of each site in terms of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). If a site is determined
to be eligible for the NRHP the applicant shall determine whether the site will be adversely affected by
the project activities; and, if so, develop and implement an appropriate mitigation plan. Two copies of
all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one copy of the North Carolina site forms, should be
forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology through this office for review and comment as soon as
they are available and in advance of any construction or ground disturbance activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists
listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey. All
activities associated with the archaeological investigations shall be coordinated with the Office of State
Archaeology prior to beginning any archaeological fieldwork.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Location: 109 East Jones Street Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/ Fax: [phone]-6599

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee.gledhill-
earle ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
6pytRamona M. Bartos

I - Aw.
1975 Aerial Photograph
Source: USDA
Scale: Not to Scale

4
F
!
r
4i QT
AmLibL
1994 Aerial Photograph
Source: Google Earth
Scale: As Shown

2005 Aerial Photograph
Source: Google Earth EE
Scale: As Shown

PHOTOGRAPHS
—'7k
#_- 4 .tJy:
lyo.. 1'P. .. L } ,
nry
E
■ 4•
Photograph No. 1
9
View of the access road located on the northern portion of the site, facing south
IP
1
Photograph No. 2
View of the large creek located on the western adjacent property, facing south.

PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph No. 3
View of the powerline easement that transects the northern portion of the site,
facing east.
Photograph No. 4
View of the wooded land located on the northern portion of the site, facing north.

PHOTOGRAPHS
77' 4MIM
l
Photograph No. 5
View of the agricultural fields located on the western portion of the site, facing
south.
Photograph No. 6
View of the pond located on the eastern portion of the site, facing west.

PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph No. 7
View of the agricultural structures located on the southwestern portion of the site,
facing east.
rr�
Photograph No. 8
View of the agricultural fields located on the central portion of the site, along
Country Club Road.

PHOTOGRAPHS
Mlllt�fieri t3 i
Photograph No. 9
View of Country Club Road, which transects the central portion of the site, facing
north.
Photograph No. 10
View of a single-family residence located on the northern portion of the site,
facing north.

PHOTOGRAPHS
ow -
Photograph No. 11
View of an agricultural structure located on the northern portion of the site, facing
east.
Photograph No. 12
View of Edwin Robertson Road and agricultural field on the northern adjacent
property, facing north.

PHOTOGRAPHS
Photograph No. 13
View of the agricultural fields located on the northeastern portion of the site,
facing east.
Photograph No. 14
View of the powerline easement located on the northern portion of the site, facing
east.

R
I t
Ir
j
1. '
� . x:� + ,yam �`�,� I I� lye R _•a � �*-_ �
4k, !
--h

PHOTOGRAPHS
s a�
Photograph No. 17
View of the pond located on the northern portion of the site, facing south.
�p
Photograph No. 18
View of the rock and asphalt debris located east of Country Club Road, facing
south.

R

PHOTOGRAPHS
V 7W
Photograph No. 21
View of the agricultural field located on the central portion of the site, facing east.
�1 • � R iti 1 .L :'fy
Photograph No. 22
View of the single-family residence located on the outparcel east of Country Club
Road, not on-site.

PHOTOGRAPHS
f
Photograph No. 23
View of a pond located on the northern portion of the site, facing west.
f
Photograph No. 24
View of a pond located on the southern portion of the site, facing south.

Eco
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
"Setting the Standard far Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Repstered Eng ineenng F rm F- 1078
Mr. Blake Hall
Vice President, PLA, PE, LEED BD+C
Timmons Group
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 112
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Reference: Limited NEPA Database Review
Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49: 2245-C
Dear Mr. Hall,
August 23, 2016
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to provide our results of the Limited NEPA Database
Review conducted for the above referenced site. Our services were provided in accordance
with ECS Proposal No. 49:415-418 and 49:1439 Rev 2.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site A:
The site is located south of the intersection of Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road in
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site consists of a portion of two larger
parent parcels totaling 1,369 acres. According to the Person County Online GIS Database
website, the Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs) for the parent parcels are: 0909-00-26-0057
and 0909-00-40-4723. The site consists of wooded land and agricultural fields. Single-family
residences are located along Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road. Agricultural
structures are located on the southeastern portion of the site. Based on the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, unnamed tributaries to Marlowe Creek are
located on the eastern portion of the site and unnamed tributaries to Story's Creek are located
on the western portion of the site. Several ponds are depicted on-site. Structures are depicted
on the northern, central, and southern portions of the site.
An approximate 15 -acre portion of Site A was not previously submitted for the USFWS Review.
The 15 -acre portion is located west of Site A and east of Storys Creek, along the southern site
boundary of both Site's A and B. Figures 2 and 3 outline the additional area.
Site B:
The site is located west of Site A and Storys Creek (Figures 2 & 3). The site is a portion of a
larger parent parcel. According to the Person County Online GIS Database website, the PIN for
the parent parcel is 0909-00-26-0057. The site consists mostly of wooded land and fields. A
powerline easement transects the northern portion of the site. Based on the USGS Topographic
Map, Storys Creek is located along the eastern portion of the site. Two unnamed tributaries to
Storys Creek are depicted on the northwestern and central portions of the site. Structures are
not depicted on the site.
9001 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC • 27617-7505 • T: 919-861-9910 • F: 919-861-9911 • www.ecslimited.com
ECS Capacl Serres, PLLC • ECS Cam€Inas, LLP • ECS C_a a€, PLLC • ECS Fonda, LLC • ECS Mid-Atanbc:, LLC • ECS Midwest LLC • ECS SouHieas� LLC • ECS Teras, LLP

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
Site C:
The site is located north of Edwin Robertson Road (Figures 5 & 6). The site is a portion of a
larger parent parcel. According to the Person County Online GIS Database website, the PIN for
the parent parcel is 0909-00-26-0057. The site consists mostly of wooded land and fields.
Based on the USGS Topographic Map, Storys Creek transects the western and northwestern
portions of the site. Unnamed tributaries to Storys Creek and Marlowe Creek are depicted on
the central and eastern portions of the site. One pond is depicted on the central portion of the
site.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary threatened and endangered species
determination and a preliminary historic and archaeological resources review for the site. ECS
personnel conducted the field reconnaissance on 06/08/16 through 06/14/16.
PRELIMINARY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES DETERMINATION
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973. The purpose of the ESA is to
protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. It is
administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Commerce Department's
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The USFWS has primary responsibility for terrestrial
and freshwater organisms, while the responsibilities of NMFS are mainly marine wildlife.
Under the ESA, species may be listed as either endangered or threatened. "Endangered"
means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"Threatened" means a species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. All
species of plants and animals, except pest insects, are eligible for listing as endangered or
threatened. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species to include subspecies,
varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments.
ECS reviewed the USFWS Endangered Species Database to identify federally protected
threatened and endangered species in Person County, North Carolina. The following federally
protected threatened and endangered species were listed for Person County, North Carolina.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Record Status
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Invertebrate
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Obscure
BGPA= Bald Eagle Protection Act
Species/Habitat Description
Bald Eagle
E = Endangered
Description: Distinguished by a white head and white tail feathers, bald eagles are powerful,
brown birds that may weigh 14 pounds and have a wingspan of 8 feet. Male eagles are smaller,
weighing as much as 10 pounds and have a wingspan of 6 feet. Sometimes confused with

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
Golden Eagles, Bald Eagles are mostly dark brown until they are four to five years old and
acquire their characteristic coloring.
Habitat: Bald Eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple
food. Bald Eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals
and carrion. Bald Eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their
habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the
birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Conclusions: The site consists mostly of agricultural fields and wooded land. The wooded
areas consist of mature and immature hardwood and pines trees, ranging from 5 to 100 years in
age. Moderately dense to very dense understory vegetation is present throughout the wooded
areas. Ponds are located on-site. Streams are located throughout the entirety of the site which
drain to Storys Creek. The stream features varied from ephemeral drainage patterns with no
bed and bank features, to large perennial streams with well-defined bed and banks. The
ephemeral and intermittent stream features on-site had little to no baseflow, minimal sinuosity,
and contained a silt substrate. These features varied from one to three feet in width and two
inches to two feet in depth. The larger, perennial stream features on-site had little to heavy
baseflow, moderate to high sinuosity, and a silty -sand -gravel -pebble -rocky substrate. These
features varied from two to twenty five feet in width and one foot to fifteen feet in depth. Several
wetland areas are located abutting and adjacent to these stream features located throughout
the site. Large open bodies of water with a steady food support base are not located on site;
herefore, suitable habitat for the Bald Eagle is not located on site.
Based on our observations and knowledge of the Bald Eagle, it is determined that suitable
habitat for this species is not located on the site.
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Description: The Dwarf Wedgemussel is a small bivalve, rarely exceeding 45 millimeters in
length. Clean young shells are usually greenish-brown with green rays. As the animal ages,
the shell color becomes obscured by diatoms or mineral deposits and appears black or brown.
The shell is thin but does thicken somewhat with age, especially toward the anterior end. The
anterior end is rounded while the posterior end is angular forming a point near the posterior -
ventral margin. The ventral margin is slightly curved. The nacre is bluish -white, appearing
whiter in the thicker anterior end. The most distinctive shell character of the Dwarf
Wedgemussel is the arrangement of the lateral teeth. There are two lateral teeth in the right
valve and one in the left valve. The typical arrangement for most freshwater mussel species
consists of two lateral teeth in the left valve and one in the right valve. The incurrent and
excurrent apertures and their associated papillae are usually white. The foot and other organs
are also white. Maximum age for the Dwarf Wedgemussel is around twelve years. The species
is a bradytictic breeder, meaning that females become gravid in the early fall and glochidia are
released by mid -spring. The tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), johnny darter
(Etheostoma nigrum), and mottled sulpin (Cottus bairdi) have been identified as hosts for the
Dwarf Wedgemussel. An anadromous fish may also serve as a host species but this has not
been documented for the Dwarf Wedgemussel in the southern portion of its range.
Habitat: The Dwarf Wedgemussel appears to be a generalist in terms of its preference for
stream size, substrate and flow conditions — it inhabits small streams less than five meters wide
to large rivers more than 100 meters wide; it is found in a variety of substrate types including

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
clay, sand, gravel and pebble, and sometimes in silt depositional areas near banks; and it
usually inhabits hydrologically stable areas, including very shallow water along stream banks
and under root mats, but it has also been found at depths of 25 feet in the Connecticut River.
Dwarf Wedgemussels are often patchily distributed in rivers.
Conclusion: The site consists mostly of agricultural fields and wooded land. The wooded
areas consist of mature and immature hardwood and pines trees, ranging from 5 to 100 years in
age. Moderately dense to very dense understory vegetation is present throughout the wooded
areas. Ponds are located on-site. Streams are located throughout the entirety of the site which
drain to Storys Creek. The stream features varied from ephemeral drainage patterns with no
bed and bank features, to large perennial streams with well-defined bed and banks. The
ephemeral and intermittent stream features on-site had little to no baseflow, minimal sinuosity,
and a silt substrate. These features varied from one to three feet in width and two inches to two
feet in depth. The larger, perennial stream features on-site had little to heavy baseflow,
moderate to high sinuosity, and a silty -sand -gravel -pebble -rocky substrate. These features
varied from two to twenty five feet in width and one foot to fifteen feet in depth. Several wetland
areas are located abutting and adjacent to these stream features located throughout the site.
The streams on site are turbid and silty. Additionally, the Dwarf Wedgemussel was not
observed during the site reconnaissance.
Based on our observations and knowledge of the Dwarf Wedgemussel, suitable habitat for this
species may be present on the site; however, streams identified were turbid and silty, which is
not conducive for the mussel. Additionally, impacts to surface waters are proposed; therefore,
ECS does not recommend additional assessment at this time.
Other federally listed threatened and endangered species were not listed for Person County by
the USFWS. Based on our assessment of the on-site conditions, ECS did not identify federally
threatened or endangered species or their habitat on the subject site.
PRELIMINARY HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES REVIEW
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was created by the United States government in
1966 under Section 101 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The purposes of
SHPO include surveying and recognizing historic properties, reviewing nominations for
properties to be included in the National Register of Historic Places, reviewing undertakings for
the impact on the properties as well as supporting federal organizations, state and local
governments, and the private sector.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary historic and archaeological resources review. The
scope of work included a field reconnaissance to identify potential historic structures, a review of
aerial photographs and a review of the SHPO online GIS mapping.
The site reconnaissance was conducted by ECS on 06/08/16 through 06/14/16. Sites A, B, and
C consists mostly of agricultural fields and wooded land. The wooded areas consist of mature
and immature hardwood and pines trees, ranging from 5 to 100 years in age. Moderately dense
to very dense understory vegetation is present throughout the wooded areas. Ponds are
located on-site. Streams are located throughout the entirety of the site which drain to Storys
Creek. The stream features varied from ephemeral drainage patterns with no bed and bank
features, to large perennial streams with well-defined bed and banks. The ephemeral and
intermittent stream features on-site had minimal to no baseflow, minimal sinuosity, and a silt

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
substrate. These features varied from one to three feet in width and two inches to two feet in
depth. The larger, perennial stream features on-site had minimal to heavy baseflow, moderate
to high sinuosity, and a silty -sand -gravel -pebble -rocky substrate. These features varied from
two to twenty five feet in width and one foot to fifteen feet in depth. Several wetland areas are
located abutting and adjacent to these stream features located throughout the site.
ECS reviewed aerial photographs of the site and immediately surrounding properties for
evidence of past development. The aerial photographs were obtained from Google Earth. The
aerial photographs reviewed were dated 1993, 1994, 1998, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009,
2011, and 2013. Aerial photographs dated prior to 1993 were not available for review. The ECS
review is dependent on the quality and scale of the photographs. Reference the attached
aerials.
On the 1993 and 1994 aerial photographs, Sites B and C consist of agricultural land and
undeveloped, wooded land. A powerline easement is depicted along the northern portion of
Site B. Agricultural structures are depicted on the central portion of Site C. Surrounding
properties consist of single-family residences, agricultural land, and undeveloped, wooded land.
On the 1998 aerial photograph, the site appears to be consistent with the previous aerial
photographs. However, it appears that four ponds are depicted on the central portion of Site C.
Other significant changes were not noted in the vicinity of the site.
On the 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, and 2013 aerial photographs, the site appears to
be consistent with the previous 1998 aerial photograph. Other significant changes were not
noted in the vicinity of the site.
We reviewed the online SHPO GIS database (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/). As depicted on
Figure 7, the database review did not identify Indian religious sites, historic structures or historic
places on the site.
Based on our site visit, the review of historical aerial photographs, and the online SHPO GIS,
ECS did not identify significant architectural or archaeological resources on the subject site.
ECS is aware of no proposed sale, transfer, or lease of historic properties on the site or within
the general vicinity of the site.
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
ECS composed letter requests addressed to the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated June 30, 2016, to
determine if the subject site is located in the immediate vicinity of registered sightings or
habitats for endangered species.
ECS utilized the North Carolina National Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer Map to
determine if records of rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or
conservation/managed areas are within the proposed project boundaries. ECS received an
automatically generated response from Ms. Allison Weakley, Conservation Planner with the
NCNHP on August 4, 2016, which states that the NCNHP does have records of rare species,
important natural communities, significant natural heritage areas (SNHAs), or
conservation/managed lands within the proposed project area. NCNHP identified element

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
occurrences of the Freshwater bivalve (Villosa constricts) which is listed as State Status —
Special Concern. NCNHP also noted that a natural areas, Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp,
are located on site. Additionally, NCNHP noted several element and natural area occurences
within a one -mile radius of the project area. Those occurrences include the Common Gray
Treefrog, Notched Rainbow, Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil, and the Rock Buttercup. Natural areas
located within one mile of the site include Marlowe Creek Slopes and Storys Creek/Marlowe
Creek Swamp. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
ECS received a response from Mr. John Ellis for Mr. Pete Benjamin, Field Supervisor, with
USFWS on July 28, 2016. The letter states that based on the information provided, and other
information available, it appears that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any
federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or
species currently proposed for listing under the Act at these sites. Therefore, they believe that
the requirements under Section 7(a)(2) of the Act are fulfilled. A copy of this correspondence is
attached.
ECS received a response from Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley for Ms. Ramona Bartos, SHPO
Representative, on July 21, 2016. The letter states that they have conducted a review of the
project and determined the project tract consists of a large ridge system located between two to
third order streams. The topography is consistent with other settings within the region that
contain a high frequency of archaeological sites noted. At this time, no surveys have been
performed on the tract for archaeological resources. NCSHPO is recommending a Phase I
archaeological survey for the tract. A copy of this correspondence is attached.
CONCLUSIONS
We have conducted a preliminary threatened and endangered species determination and a
preliminary historic and archaeological resources review for the site. Please note that our
services did not include detailed studies for threatened and endangered species or historic and
archaeological resources for Site B and Site C. Based on correspondence from the NCNHP
and the NCSHPO, additional assessment is recommended prior to development of the site.
ECS can oversee this investigation as part of an additional scope of work, outside our original
services rendered for the site.
In order to protect aquatic resources, vegetated buffers should be maintained around surface
waters on the site and on the downstream side of the project. In addition, best management
practices for erosion and sedimentation control should be followed during construction.

Limited NEPA Database Review — Project Trace
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No.: 49-2245-C
CLOSING
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (919) 861-
9910 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
{
Cory Darnell
Environmental Project Manager
Attachments:
Brandon Fulton
Environmental Principal
Figure 1 — 7
Topographic Site Map, Aerial Site Map, NCSHPO Site Map
Agency Correspondence
Historic Aerials
Photographs

�V
Site A
Site B (Area Previously Reviewed)
200 acres ,
Portion of Site A
O (Previously Not Reviewed) • -
15 acres ,, F
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
FIGURE 1
SOURCE: AERIAL SITE MAP
Person County GIS
2012 Aerial Photograph andfro Project Trace
ECS Field Notes Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 1,700' 077i
ECS Proiect No.: 49: 2245-C

+r
f� lf'� r+ � � ��-��'�{'J1 .'tel � �' •i
* � Y•L r f ' 1
k
5 �'4
f k �
+{ � �Y � � �� �I I• J � rT - � i
1
� I ti —stir � ! J~ J __ ' e�� _ — I � T •'_ a L .
_ 1. ��� i ��- - �•. - �! r I' '� � -- �� �
xzz
1 5 71,
LEGEND +=-r_ ~
Approximate Site B Boundary
Approximate Site A Boundary
SOURCE: FIGURE 2
United States Geological Survey 7.5 — SITE LOCATION MAP
Minute Series Topographic Map:
Olive Hill, Created: 1968, Revised: 1984 Project Trace — Site B
Roxboro, Created: 1982; Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
NC Quadrangles Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Contour Interval = 10 feet
Scale: 1" = 1,000' ECS Project No.: 49: 2245-C

_
. I r
F
r f
r
Li '
r
'fir
f ilk 1
.1
'N
•,•� •L .testi •�
� � 4ri� '
~kms
LEGEND
__ •" - � •�
_ �
Approximate Site Boundary ' — 4
3 Y
y
-
SOURCE:
FIGURE 5
United States
Geological Survey
SITE LOCATION MAP
Topographic Map: Olive Hill, Created: 1968,
Revised: 1984; Roxboro, Created: 1982;
Project Trace — Site C
Cluster Springs, Created:
1968, Revised:
Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson
Road
1987; Alton, Created: 1968, Revised: 1990;
Roxboro, Person County, North
Carolina
NC Quadrangles,
Contour Interval = 10'
Scale: 1"= 1,000'
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245-C

rA
41E
Ir
1 -
-. • . .,.
- -� 'i Li yy�l •• �i • ~ � ti � F'ti� f
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
SOURCE: FIGURE 6
AERIAL SITE MAP
Person County GIS
2012 Aerial Photograph and Project Trace —Site C
ECS Field Notes Country Club Road & Edwin Robertson Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Scale: 1" = 1,300'
ECS Project No.: 49: 2245-C

N0ttrru1 uncf
Cuhurai Resoury s
August 4, 2016
Kristen Cottrell
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
RE: Project Trace; 49-2245-C
Dear Kristen Cottrell:
PAT McC.'RORY
cage no.
SUSAN iLL'TTZ
SE-emry
NCNHDE-2021
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Suzanne Mason at suzanne.masonancdcr.gov or 919.707.8637.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
---:"'Nothing Compares
StffieofNorihCamEm I Depz=mtofNk ualmdCb1amdR.eeaur€es
104 East Imes Street I Raleigh 19C 27601
919407-730D

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Project Trace
Project No. 49-2245-C
August 4, 2016
NCNHDE-2021
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Freshwater 29502 Villosa constricta Notched Rainbow 2006-02-24 E 3 -Medium --- Special G3 S3
Bivalve Concern
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp R5 (General) C5 (General)
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https:Hncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/help. Data query generated on August 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q2 June 2016. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Project Trace
Project No. 49-2245-C
August 4, 2016
NCNHDE-2021
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific NameCommon
Name ast
Element Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Amphibian
21719
Hyla versicolor
Common Gray Treefrog 2005-07-13
E
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S2S3
Rare
Freshwater
29502
Villosa constricta
Notched Rainbow 2006-02-24
E
3 -Medium
---
Special
G3
S3
Bivalve
Concern
Natural
25502
Basic Mesic Forest
--- 2008
C
2 -High
---
---
G3G4
S3S4
Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
Vascular Plant
24047
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 2006-08-09
B
3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
24127
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 2006-09-11
D?
2 -High
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
24142
Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 2006-08-22
D
2 -High
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
27371
Ranunculus micranthus
Rock Buttercup 1973-04-23
H
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S1
Rare Peripheral
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
Marlowe Creek Slopes
R3 (High)
C4 (Moderate)
Storys Creek/Marlowe Creek Swamp
R5 (General)
C5 (General)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https:Hncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/help. Data query generated on August 4, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q2 June 2016. Please resubmit your
Page 3 of 5

information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-2021: Project Trace
August 4, 2016
[� Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 5 of 5
1:39,235
0 0.325 0.85 1.3 mi
0 0.5 1 2 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, ❑eLo , Intermap, incre nt P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
as
FAO, NPS, NRCAR GeoBe, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esn ana Weng "). swisatapo. Mapnnyinda, ® OWStrea[Map
r,
contributoand the GIS User Com no

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 28, 2016
Paul Stephens IV
ECS Carolinas LLP
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
Re: Project Trace — Person County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.ftvs.-0ov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office fora list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concerns that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of anv
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment of evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The tenn "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
Pee Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
N
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

` Qu ,
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 21, 2016
Paul M. Stephens IV
ECS Carolinas, LLP
9001 Glenwood Ave
Raleigh, NC 27617-7505
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Project Trace Additional Areas, Country Club Road and Edwin Robertson Road, Roxboro,
ECS 49: 2245-C, Person County, ER 14-1122
Dear Mr. Stephens:
Thank you for your letter of June 30, 2016, concerning the above -referenced project. We have reviewed
the project information referenced above and offer the following comments.
The project tract consists of a large ridge system located between two second to third order streams. This
system contains floodplains, terraces, relatively long linear ridgetops, ridgetoes, and several likely
springheads. The topography is consistent with other settings within the region that contain a high
frequency of archaeological resources, particularly prehistoric sites. While there are no previously
recorded archaeological sites noted within the tract at present, the area has never been surveyed for
archaeological resources. Given the nature of this landscape as a whole and the high probability of
prehistoric remains, we recommend a Phase I archaeological survey of the tract. As a result, we
recommend the following conditions for this application:
Prior to initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, the applicant shall
arrange for an archaeological survey of the entire project area (approximately 1,369 acres). The
purpose of this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding
the eligibility status of each site in terms of the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). If a
site is determined to be eligible for the NRHP the applicant shall determine whether the site will be
adversely affected by the project activities; and, if so, develop and implement an appropriate
mitigation plan. Two copies of all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one copy of the North
Carolina site forms, should be forwarded to the Office of State Archaeology through this office for
review and comment as soon as they are available and in advance of any construction or ground
disturbance activities.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in
North Carolina is available at www.a.rchaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The
archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the
recommended survey. The selected archaeologist will consult with the Office of State Archaeology
regarding the project methods prior to the commencement of any field work activities. All
additional activities associated with the archaeological investigations shall also be coordinated with
the Office of State Archaeology prior to implementation in the field.
We recommend a meeting between the Office of State Archaeology and your office prior to selection of a
contractor in order to discuss survey methods and levels of effort related to this project. We feel a meeting
of this sort will help you develop a survey plan that will be both cost and time -efficient in its application.
In addition, it will help you develop a viable Request for Proposal (RFP) to circulate to potential
contractors. Please contact Ms. Susan Myers at 919-807-6556 or John Mintz at 919-807-6555 to arrange
this meeting.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
603,Ramona M. Bartos

Project Trace— NEPA Report
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245-C
Photo 1: View of the central portion of Site C, facing south.
Photo 2: Typical view of the streams on site, facing north.
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 1

:�
,l

Project Trace— NEPA Report
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245-C
Photo 5: Typical view of the wooded land located on sites B and C.
Photo 6: View of Storys Creek, facing south.
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 3

Project Trace— NEPA Report
Edwin Robertson Road and Country Club Road
Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 2245-C
Photo 7: Typical view of an unnamed tributary of Storys Creek and abutting wetlands,
facing east.
Photo 8: Typical view of the wooded land on Site B, facing east.
ECS Carolinas, LLP Page 4

Archaeological Investigations of the
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
(ER 14-1122)
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc.
2017

Archaeological Investigations of the
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
(ER 14-1122)
Prepared for
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by
Brooke Brilliant
Archaeologist
Michael Keith O'Neal
Principal Investigator
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc.
2017

Management Summary
In July 2017, Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas (ACC) conducted an archaeological
survey of the proposed Project Trace Expansion Tracts. This project was undertaken on behalf of ECS
Carolinas, LLP. The project area includes two tracts (Tract B and Tract C), which are located in the north -
central portion of Person County, north of the city of Roxboro. The total project area is approximately 630
acres (255 ha) in size and encompasses a variety of settings including floodplain bottom lands, narrow upland
ridges, pasture, planted pine forests, clear cut areas, and pine and hardwood forests
Prior to the initiation of the Phase I survey, ACC conducted a review of background information
about the project tract and its vicinity, and conducted a field reconnaissance of the tract. Approximately 200
acres (81 ha) of the 630 acres (255 ha) in the project tracts were defined as having high potential for the
presence of archaeological resources. ACC recommended that those 200 acres (81 ha) be subjected to
intensive Phase I survey and that the remainder of the tract did not warrant field investigation beyond the
reconnaissance level. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with this recommendation
in a letter dated 21 February 2017. After this recommendation was made, Person County decided not to
develop a portion of the tracts, reducing the high potential area to approximately 156.4 acres (63 ha).
The Phase I archaeological survey of the 156.4 acres (63 ha) within the Project Trace Expansion
tracts resulted in the identification, delineation, and evaluation of 12 archaeological resources (Table i.1).
Each of these resources has undergone severe disturbance from a variety of factors including modern day
land use and erosion. None of these resources are considered to retain research potential beyond the survey
level of investigation and are recommended not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places NRHP).
Table Ll. Summary of Archaeological Resources in the Project Tracts.
Site Number
Description
NRNP Eligibility
Recommendation
31PR148**
Early 19' Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR149**
Early 19 -Mid- 20' Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR150
Unknown Prehistoric Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
31PR151
Middle Archaic Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR152**
Early to Mid -20th Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR153
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR154
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR155
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR156
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR157
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR158
Unknown Prehistoric Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
31PR159/159**
Late 18' -Early 19' Century Historic Ceramic Scatter, Prehistoric
Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
1 -. ',
, ,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
'•., �' 11

Table of Contents
Management Summary..............................................................ii
Listof Figures.................................................................... iv
Listof Tables.................................................................... vi
Chapter 1. Introduction.............................................................. 1
Introduction.......................................................... 1
Project Tracts......................................................... 1
Methods of Investigation................................................. 4
Chapter 2. Environmental and Cultural Overview ......................................... 10
Environmental Overview ................................................ 10
Cultural Overview .................................................... 13
Chapter 3. Results of the Background Research and Reconnaissance Investigation ................. 21
Background Research .................................................. 21
Reconnaissance Investigation ............................................ 26
Chapter 4. Results of Field Investigations ............................................... 28
Summary and Recommendations .......................................... 60
ReferencesCited.................................................................. 61
Appendix A. Artifact Catalog and PPK Report
Appendix B. Resume of Principal Investigator
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I
iii

List of Figures
Page
Figure 1.1.
Map showing the project tract in Person County ............................... 1
Figure 1.2.
Topographic map showing the survey area ...................................
2
Figure 1.3.
Aerial view of the survey area .............................................
3
Figure 1.4.
View of old road bed in Tract B, looking east .................................
4
Figure 1.5.
View of transmission line corridor in Tract B, looking east .......................
4
Figure 1.6.
View of young planted pines along logging road in Tract C, looking east .............
4
Figure 1.7.
View of pasture and farm road in Tract C, looking southwest .....................
4
Figure 1.8.
LiDAR map showing the survey area and excluded high potential areas in Tract B.....
6
Figure 1.9.
LiDAR map showing the survey area and excluded high potential areas in Tract C.....
7
Figure 2.1.
Physiographic map of North Carolina showing the project area location .............
10
Figure 2.2.
Map of the Roanoke River Basin showing the approximate location of the project
area...............................................................
11
Figure 2.3
Map showing soil types present in the project tracts ............................
12
Figure 2.4.
Map showing Saponi ancestral towns ......................................
18
Figure 3.1.
Map showing the location of previously recorded archaeological sites and historic
resources within the vicinity of the project tracts ..............................
22
Figure 3.2.
A portion of the 1910 Rural Delivery Routes map showing the project tracts.........
23
Figure 3.3.
A portion of the 1928 Person County soil map showing the project tracts............
24
Figure 3.4.
A portion of the 1938 Person County Highway map showing the project tracts. ......
25
Figure 4.1.
Map of project tract showing locations of identified archaeological resources.........
29
Figure 4.2.
View of site 31PR148**, looking east ......................................
30
Figure 4.3.
Plan map of site 31PR148**.............................................
31
Figure 4.4.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR148**, looking south...........
31
Figure 4.5.
View of southern chimney base at 31PR148**, looking southeast .................
32
Figure 4.6.
View of site 31PRI 49**, looking east ......................................
33
Figure 4.7.
Plan map of site 31PRI 49** .............................................
34
Figure 4.8.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR148**, looking north...........
35
Figure 4.9.
View of Structure 1 foundation, looking northeast .............................
35
Figure 4.10.
View of Structure 1 chimney base, looking east ...............................
36
Figure 4.11.
View of Structure 2 foundation, looking northwest . ...........................
36
Figure 4.12.
View of well, looking south ..............................................
36
Figure 4.13.
View of possible chimney base, looking north ................................
36
Figure 4.14.
View of pit feature, looking south .........................................
36
Figure 4.15.
View of Structure 3 rock footer, looking north ................................
38
Figure 4.16.
View of Structure 3 chimney, looking north ..................................
39
Figure 4.17.
View of site 31PRI 50, looking southeast ....................................
41
Figure 4.18.
Plan map of site 31PR150...............................................
42
Figure 4.19
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR150, looking southeast. ........
42
Figure 4.20.
View of site 31PRI 51 looking southeast ....................................
43
Figure 4.21.
Plan map of site 31PR151...............................................
43
Figure 4.22
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PRI 51, looking north. ...........
44
Figure 4.23.
View of site 31PRI 52**, looking southeast ..................................
44
Figure 4.24.
Plan view of site 31PR152**.............................................
45
I -� ',
, ,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
iv

List of Figures continued
Page
Figure 4.25.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR152**, looking southeast........
45
Figure 4.26.
View of Rock Pile 1 at site 31PR152**, looking northeast .......................
46
Figure 4.27.
View of Rock Pile 2 at site 31PR152**, looking east ...........................
46
Figure 4.28.
View of site 31PRI 53, looking south .......................................
47
Figure 4.29.
Plan map of site 31PR153...............................................
48
Figure 4.30.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR153, looking north. ...........
48
Figure 4.31.
View of site 31PRI 54, looking south .......................................
49
Figure 4.32.
Plan map of site 31PR154...............................................
50
Figure 4.33.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site31PRI 54, looking north .............
50
Figure 4.34.
View of site 31PR155, looking northwest ...................................
51
Figure 4.35.
Plan map of site 31PR155...............................................
51
Figure 4.36.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR155. ......................
52
Figure 4.37.
View of site 31PR156, looking northwest ...................................
52
Figure 4.38.
Plan map of site 31PR156...............................................
53
Figure 4.39.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR156, looking north. ...........
53
Figure 4.40.
View of site 31PR157, looking northeast ....................................
54
Figure 4.41.
Plan map of site 31PR157...............................................
55
Figure 4.42.
Representative shovel test profile from site 31PR157, looking southwest............
55
Figure 4.43.
View of wooded portion of site 31PR158, looking east . ........................
56
Figure 4.44.
View of dirt roads in the site 31PRI 58 vicinity, looking south ....................
57
Figure 4.45.
Plan map of site 31PR15................................................
57
Figure 4.46.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR158, looking north. ...........
58
Figure 4.47.
View of site 31PR159/159**, looking north ..................................
58
Figure 4.48.
Plan map of site 31PR159/159**.........................................
59
Figure 4.49.
Representative shovel test soil profile from site 31PR159/159**, looking north.......
59
,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
v

List of Tables
Page
Table i.1.
Summary of Archaeological Resources in the Project Tracts ...................... ii
Table 2.1
Summary of Soil Types Present in the Project Tracts ...........................
13
Table 3.1.
Summary of Archaeological Resources Recorded in the Vicinity of the Project Tracts..
21
Table 3.2.
Summary of Potential Archaeological Sites Identified During the Reconnaissance of
the Project Trace Expansion Tracts ........................................
26
Table 4.1.
Summary of Archaeological Resources Identified in the Project Tracts ..............
28
Table 4.2.
Summary of Historic Artifacts Recovered from 31PR148**.....................
32
Table 4.3.
Summary of Historic Artifacts Recovered from Site 31PR149** Locus A...........
37
Table 4.4.
Summary of Historic Artifacts Recovered from Site 31PR149** Locus B...........
39
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I
vi

Chapter 1. Introduction
Introduction
In July 2017, Archaeological Consultants
of the Carolinas (ACC) conducted an
archaeological survey of the proposed Project
Trace Expansion tracts. The project area is located
in Person County, north of Roxboro (Figure 1.1).
This project was undertaken on behalf of ECS
Carolinas, LLP at the request of the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO; ER 14-
1122) pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance (36 CFR Part 800). The goals of this
investigation were to identify all archaeological
resources located within the survey area, assess
those resources for eligibility to the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and make
management recommendations, as appropriate.
Michael K. O'Neal served as Principal
Investigator. Mr. O'Neal was assisted by Luan
Cao, Abigail Rowe, Jamie Richert, Shawn Johns,
and Tyler Parrott in the field.
Pro*t 7r -e - 0119W
EKpan516ri Tn N,
i
Person
County RoOcro
Figure 1.1. Map showing the project location in
Person County.
A preliminary reconnaissance of the project tracts was conducted by ACC in January 2017. Based
on the results of the field reconnaissance and background research, approximately 200 (81 ha) of the 630
acres (255 ha) in the project tracts were defined as having high potential for the presence of archaeological
resources. ACC recommended that those 200 acres (81 ha) be subjected to intensive Phase I survey and that
the remainder of the tracts did not warrant field investigation beyond the reconnaissance level. The SHPO
concurred with that recommendation in a letter dated 21 February 2017. After this recommendation was
made, Person County decided not to develop a portion of the tracts, reducing the high potential area to
approximately 156.4 acres (63 ha). This report documents the methods and results of the overall
investigation of the Project Trace Expansion tracts.
Project Tracts
The project area is comprised of two tracts (Tract B and Tract C), which are situated in north -central
Person County and have a combined measurement of approximately 630 acres (255 ha; Figures 1.2 and 1.3).
Tract B measures approximately 200 acres (81 ha) and is bounded on the east by Storys Creek. The
remainder of the boundary consists of property lines. The primary vegetation in the vicinity is mixed pines
and hardwoods and/or cedars. A transmission line corridor traverses Tract B from east to west. South of
this transmission line corridor, an old road bed extends east -west through the tract. Tract C is located
northeast of Tract B. It is bounded to the south by Edwin Robertson Road and property lines represented
by tree lines or fence lines form the northern, eastern, and western boundaries. Story Creek also follows the
southern portion of the western boundary of Tract C before it turns to the northeast. The southern portion
h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I

NV�
�
US.
N.
Poll
ract
r
rJ 4 an-
rid � ,rw
==
~ Project Trace Expansion Tracts
�.
Project Tracts
4 41� Survey Area
' f 0 Sao 600 soo
T f '
��� � � I •..� �� Meters
Figure 1.2. Topographic map showing the survey area (1968 USGS 7.5 minute Olive Hill, NC and
Roxboro, NC topographic quadrangles [photorevised 1994]).
ACC, lnc.: .Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
N

N
ti
Figure 1.3. Aerial view of the survey area.
ACC, Inc. Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
;-_
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Project Tracts
Survey Area
4 304 640 804
Meters
K1

of Tract C is pasture with some wooded areas along the western tract boundary. Young planted pines and
grass dominate in the northern section of the tract. Clear cut areas are also present in the northern portion
of Tract C. A farm road extends north from Edwin Robertson Road into the tract. A barn and two
recreational vehicles are located west of this farm road at the southern end of the tract. The farm road turns
into a logging road with a number of other logging roads splitting off from it in the central and northern
portions of the tract. Both tracts are characterized by floodplain, ridge top, ridge noses, knolls, and steep side
slope. Figures 1.4 through 1.7 show examples of the settings within the tracts.
Figure 1.4. View of old road bed in Tract B,
looking east.
J
Figure 1.5. View of transmission line corridor
in Tract B, looking east.
Figure 1.6. View of young planted pines along Figure 1.7. View of pasture and farm road in
logging road in Tract C, looking Tract C, looking southwest.
east.
Methods of Investigation
This investigation included four separate tasks: Background Research, Field Investigations,
Laboratory Analysis, and Report Production. Each of these tasks is described below. Background research
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I
51
r"
I"
A
Figure 1.5. View of transmission line corridor
in Tract B, looking east.
Figure 1.6. View of young planted pines along Figure 1.7. View of pasture and farm road in
logging road in Tract C, looking Tract C, looking southwest.
east.
Methods of Investigation
This investigation included four separate tasks: Background Research, Field Investigations,
Laboratory Analysis, and Report Production. Each of these tasks is described below. Background research
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I
51

was conducted during the reconnaissance phase of the investigation. Field investigations include both
reconnaissance and intensive Phase I survey.
Background Research. Background research began with a review of archaeological site forms, maps,
and reports on file at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) in Raleigh, North Carolina. This review serves
to identify previously recorded resources in the project vicinity and provides data on the prehistoric and
historical context of the project tracts. Architectural site forms, maps, and reports on file at the Department
of Historical Resources (DHR), Survey and Planning Branch in Raleigh were reviewed to determine
previously recorded architectural resources in the project vicinity. Background research also included a
review of available historic maps of the project area and the county overall. These included the 1910 Rural
Delivery Routes map, the 1928 Person County Soil Survey map, and the 1938 Person County Highway map
(Hem et al. 1928; NCSHPWC 1938; USPOD 1910).
Field Investigations: Reconnaissance. Prior to beginning field work, maps using Light Detection
and Ranging (LiDAR) images and short interval (4 -ft) contours were used to select representative
topographic (e.g., ridge tops, floodplain) and environmental (e.g., woods, clear cuts, pasture) settings to
inspect during the field reconnaissance. These areas were examined through pedestrian walkover and the
excavation of judgementally placed shovel tests. Areas where one or more artifacts or cultural features (e.g.,
chimney base) were identified within a 30 -meter radius were designated as potential sites. No site
delineations were conducted during the reconnaissance. This reconnaissance resulted in the determination
that approximately 200 acres (81 ha) of the 630 acres (255 ha) in the project tracts warranted more intensive
investigation. This area of high potential was determined on the basis of landform, soil type, and conditions
noted in the field. High potential areas focus primarily on the ridge tops and ridge toes. No further work was
recommended for poorly drained areas (i.e., the floodplain) or areas with steep slope (greater than 15 percent)
due to their generally low potential for archaeological sites. A document detailing the reconnaissance efforts
and recommendations was submitted to the SHPO, who concurred with the plan advanced for formal Phase
I survey of the project areas. Subsequently, Person County decided not to develop approximately 43.6 acres
(18 ha) of the area determined to have high potential for archaeological sites. This resulted in the reduction
of the survey area to approximately 156.4 acres (63 ha). Figures 1.8 and 1.9 show the project tracts, the
areas slated for formal survey, and those areas excluded from the Area of Potential Effect (APE) following
the field reconnaissance.
Field Investigations: Phase I Survey. The field survey consisted of the excavation of shovel tests
at 30 -meter intervals along transects spaced 30 meters apart in the areas determined to have high potential
for archaeological deposits. Transects were aligned with landforms (Figures 1.8 and 1.9). To
comprehensively investigate micro- landforms, additional shovel tests were placed at closer intervals in
judgementally determined locations throughout the tract. Excavated shovel tests measured approximately
30 centimeters in diameter. Shovel test fill was screened through 0.25 inch wire mesh. Details of artifacts
and soils for each shovel test were recorded in field notebooks. Artifacts were collected and placed in plastic
bags labeled with the date, field site number, grid point locations (i.e., shovel test/transect or northeast
coordinate), depth of artifacts, and initials of the excavator. In areas with good surface visibility (greater than
75 percent), a comprehensive examination of all exposed ground surface supplemented the shovel testing.
A site is formally defined as any location where an artifact or surface or subsurface cultural feature
is are present. Artifacts and/or features less than 50 years in age would not be considered a site without a
specific research or management reason. Sites were delineated by excavating shovel tests at 15 -meter
intervals in cardinal directions from all positive shovel tests until two consecutive negative shovel tests were
encountered. Site settings were photographed with a digital camera. Sketch maps were produced in the field
h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I

Tract B
�, �.
JRa4 kIkLILli 4
fi
k �
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Project Tract Survey Transects
Survey Area Road
I Excluded HP Are 4 -ft Contour
a9 6 S10 220 330 440
Meters K
Figure 1.8. LiDAR map showing Tract B and the areas slated for Phase I survey and those excluded
from the APE under the modified development plan.
ACC, lnc.: .Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
C

+� J=
Ppr
.
loop
00 ' -
IK
- Edwin Rupe'!!?'
Apansion Tracts
Survey Transects
Road
Area 4-R Contour i
io 540 720
n i
;fir$ i

showing the locations of shovel tests and surface finds. The locations of each site were recorded using a
Trimble Pathfinder Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, and the locations were relayed onto project maps.
During the Phase I survey, all potential sites identified in the during the field reconnaissance that were
located in the APE were revisited and fully documented and evaluated.
Site significance is based on the site's ability to contribute to our understanding of past lifeways, and
its subsequent eligibility for listing on the NRHP. Department of Interior regulations (36 CFR Part 60)
established criteria which must be met for an archaeological site or historic resource to be considered
significant, or eligible for the NRHP (Townsend et al. 1993). Under these criteria, a site can be defined as
significant if it retains integrity of "location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association" and if it A) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
pattern of history; B) is associated with the lives of persons significant in the past; C) embodies distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents work of a master, possesses high
artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual
distinction; or D) has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory.
Archaeological sites are most frequently evaluated pursuant to Criterion D. However, all archaeological sites
can be considered under all four criteria.
The primary goals of this field investigation were to identify archaeological resources and evaluate
their potential research value or significance. Although the determination of the site significance is made
by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), whenever possible, sufficient data is gathered to allow us
to make a significance recommendation. Sites that exhibit little or no further research potential are
recommended not eligible for the NRHP and no further investigation is proposed. Sites for which
insufficient data could be obtained at the survey level are considered unassessed and preservation or more
in-depth investigation is advocated. It is rare for ample data to be recovered at the survey level of
investigation to definitively determine that a site meets NRHP eligibility criteria. However, when this
occurs, the site is recommended eligible for the NRHP. Again, preservation of the resource is advocated.
If preservation is not possible, mitigation options (e.g., data recovery) would need to be considered.
Laboratory Analysis. Laboratory work began with washing all recovered artifacts. A provenience
number, based on the context of the artifact (i.e., surface or subsurface), was assigned to each positive shovel
test location or surface collection area. Within each provenience, each individual artifact or artifact class
was then assigned a number. Artifact descriptions, counts, and weights were recorded. All diagnostic and
cross -mended artifacts were labeled with a solution of Acryloid B-72 and acid -free permanent ink.
Prehistoric artifacts were cataloged based on specific morphological characteristics, such as material
in the case of lithics and decoration, form, and temper type in the case of prehistoric ceramics. Methods of
manufacture and temporal associations were categorized using Coe (1964, 1995), Hayden (1979), Herbert
(2009), Ward (1983), and Ward and Davis (1999).
Historic artifacts were identified by color, material of manufacture (e.g., ceramics), type (e.g.,
slipware), form (e.g., bowl, plate), method of manufacture (e.g., molded), period of manufacture (e.g., 1780-
1820), and intended function (e.g., tableware). Historic artifacts with established manufacture date ranges
would have been categorized using Aultman et al. (2016), Brown (1982), Feldhues (1995), Florida Museum
of Natural History (2009), Majewski and O'Brien (1987), Noel Hume (1969), and South (1977, 2004).
At the conclusion of this project, all project related material, including field notes, artifacts, and
project maps, will be prepared for curation based on standards set forth in 36 CFR 79 (Curation of Federally
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I

Owned and Administered Archaeological Collections: Final Rule) and in the OSA curation guidelines.
These standards and guidelines require that all project -related material be placed in archivally stable storage
bags and boxes. Upon acceptance of the final project report by the SHPO, the project material will be
submitted to OSA for permanent curation.
Report Production. Report preparation involved the compilation of all data gathered during the
previous tasks. The following chapter provides environmental and cultural overviews for the project area.
Next, the results of the field investigation are discussed. Each identified resource is described, shown on
project maps, and NRHP eligibility recommendations are advanced. The data obtained through laboratory
analysis are included in site descriptions. Finally, a summary of the overall project is presented along with
management recommendations, as appropriate.
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
I

Chapter 2. Environmental and Cultural Overview
To interpret cultural resources, it is necessary to understand the larger context within which they
occur. The natural environment, technological development, and ideological values are all intertwined in
shaping the way humans live. In this chapter, details about the local environment and cultural development
in the region are presented to provide a context within which cultural resources can be assessed. This basic
framework is an important tool in evaluating the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility of
these resources.
Environmental Overview
Person County is located in central North Carolina along the border with the state of Virginia. The
county encompasses 1,050 square kilometers (405 .4 sq mi). It is bounded by Orange and Durham counties
on the south, Caswell County on the west, and Granville County on the east. Person County lies in the
Piedmont physiographic province and is situated on the central Piedmont plateau (Figure 2.1). Rolling hills
dissected by intermittent and perennial streams are the most frequent landforms within this province. The
Uwharrie Mountains, which begin in Montgomery County, terminates in northern Person County. Average
elevation of the county is 219 meters above mean sea level (amsl). Elevations in the project tract range from
112 to 157 meters amsl (Sink 1995).
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Physiographic Provinces
Project Are
BLUE RIDGE
TIDEWATER
fL
L��
r
PIEDMONT
MIDDLE AND UPPER
COASTAL PLAIN
N, PRT" CAROLINA CENTER FOR
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION &ANALYS IS
Auy,is[ 9587
= I7.
--
Figure 2.1. Physiographic map of North Carolina showing the project area location.
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I 10

Landforms. The project tracts contain a variety of landforms and topographic settings. Floodplain
associated with Storys Creek is present in Tract B, but a wetland buffer precludes development. This area
is excluded from the Phase I survey, with the exception of any ridge toes that extend into the floodplain from
the adjacent uplands. The majority of both tracts are characterized by relatively narrow upland ridges and
their adjacent side slopes. Small intermittent drainages divide the narrow ridges, and it is likely that small
spring heads occur at the upper reaches of some of these small. Many of the narrow ridges have old logging
roads or farm roads running down their crests.
Drainage. The project
area is within the Roanoke River
drainage basin (Figure 2.2). The
numerous small intermittent
drainages within the tracts form a
dendritic pattern that feeds two
prominent creeks. Tract B is
bounded on the east by Storys
Creek. Tract C is bounded on the
west by Storys Creek and is east of
Marlowe Creek. Storys Creek
merges with Marlowe Creek north
of Tract C. The creek then flows
northward and empties into the
Hyco River.
The Hyco River has been
known by the variant names
Hicootomony Creek, Hy Coyee
River H co Creek and H co -o-
.7 1 .7
tee River. In Person County, the Figure 2.2. Map of the Roanoke River Basin showing the
Hyco River has been dammed to approximate location of the project area.
create Hyco Lake, which is a
recreational destination in the county. North of the lake, the Hyco River flows into the Dan River near South
Boston, Virginia. The Dan River in turn flows into the Roanoke River, which empties into the Atlantic
Ocean via North Carolina's Albemarle Sound.
Soils Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture's Person County Soil Survey was
reviewed to better understand the project setting. Figure 2.3 shows the soil type distribution within the study
tract. The soil types present are summarized in Table 2.1.
There are six soil types present in the project tracts. The majority of these soil types present in the
project tracts are classified as well -drained or moderately well -drained. In general, soil types that are well -
drained are considered to have high potential for the presence of archaeological deposits. Areas containing
these soil characteristics account for approximately 99.2 percent of the survey area; however, some have
severe slope ranges. Well -drained and moderately drained soils in the project tracts include Siloam loam
(76.9 acres), Rasalo fine sandy loam (68 acres), Oak Level loam (6.6 acres), Helena sandy loam (2.1 acres),
and Wedowee sandy loam (1.5 acres). These soils, present on the upper ridges and lower ride toes, are
composed of saprolite derived from diorite, gabbro, diabase, and/or geneiss and generally form on slopes of
h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
,� Person County, North Carolina
r
f �
Valleyand
Ridge -
Appalachian
Plateaus
_
Roanoke
River Basin ,
!' ~ Projec[AWR
-
NORTH CAIROLIN k
Blue Ridge s
Piedmont
Coastal
Plain
.7 1 .7
tee River. In Person County, the Figure 2.2. Map of the Roanoke River Basin showing the
Hyco River has been dammed to approximate location of the project area.
create Hyco Lake, which is a
recreational destination in the county. North of the lake, the Hyco River flows into the Dan River near South
Boston, Virginia. The Dan River in turn flows into the Roanoke River, which empties into the Atlantic
Ocean via North Carolina's Albemarle Sound.
Soils Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture's Person County Soil Survey was
reviewed to better understand the project setting. Figure 2.3 shows the soil type distribution within the study
tract. The soil types present are summarized in Table 2.1.
There are six soil types present in the project tracts. The majority of these soil types present in the
project tracts are classified as well -drained or moderately well -drained. In general, soil types that are well -
drained are considered to have high potential for the presence of archaeological deposits. Areas containing
these soil characteristics account for approximately 99.2 percent of the survey area; however, some have
severe slope ranges. Well -drained and moderately drained soils in the project tracts include Siloam loam
(76.9 acres), Rasalo fine sandy loam (68 acres), Oak Level loam (6.6 acres), Helena sandy loam (2.1 acres),
and Wedowee sandy loam (1.5 acres). These soils, present on the upper ridges and lower ride toes, are
composed of saprolite derived from diorite, gabbro, diabase, and/or geneiss and generally form on slopes of
h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
,� Person County, North Carolina

Soil Type.
Codorus and Haftro sells (CoA)
Helena sandy loam (HeB) ,
.I Oak Level loam (OaB)
Rassalo fine sandy loam (RaB. RaC) +
Siloarn loam (SmB, Srn❑. Sm F)
Wedowee sandy loam (WeE)
a
\,lI Sm❑
Slnf 1�Tf�Gt
Jo
ti, fr
�• IT 5nIF � SrnF
r
SrnF
s l a s,,, ❑ {
4 SRIF Q
_CnA7�y aA
}il++Df Sen❑
SmF RaB SIil6� .
� * '-
�OaB � {Srr.
dery
SuIL'
5•nB
p kf Srnt}
+ � r .J �-1D FdA'in RobsRsrY1 RA
Sm �A �-e
f ado* 7 r
J
If2Gt er
00
SmF RUC Cop' '
_._,..
SM F CoA
Si! .Cr i•2,,!3
' 3R,iG
_. sr,l:s
SmF SRIF' :r„r /
SmF S'n� �iI t
�R;,G 1 49,�
WEEti
s1=.F snrF � r
o -
`- WeE SmF 3C Project Trace Expansion Tracts
F:
I
4.1i•r-' I FiPB SmF f 3
Survey Area
Road W,.
f � _ Contour
a 210
' zoo azo sso aao
IPPWhletets
Figure 2.3. Map showing soils present in the project tracts.
in Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
12

Table 2.1. Summary of Soil Types in the Project Tracts (USDA 2017).
Soil Type
Description
%
Coverage
Archaeological
Potential
Codorus and Hatboro soils (CoA)
somewhat poorly drained, frequently
flooded, 0-2% slope
0.8
Low
Helena sandy loam (HeB)
moderately well drained, 2-6% slope
1.3
High
Oak Level loam (OaB)
well drained, 2-6% slope
4.2
High
Rassalo fine sandy loam (RaB, RaQ
well drained, 2-10% slope
43.5
High
Siloam loam (SmB, SmD)
well drained, 2-15% slope
35.7
High
Siloam loam (SmF)
well drained, steep, 15-45% slope
14.5
Low
Wedowee sandy loam (WeE)
well drained, steep, 15-25% slope
1.0
Low
2 to 15 percent. Wedowee sandy loam and some areas of Siloam loam are classified as well -drained, but
have slope ranges greater than 15 percent. Due to their steep slope, these areas are considered to have low
potential for archaeological sites. Poorly drained soils are also generally considered to have low
archaeological potential. There is one poorly drained soil type present in the survey area. This soil type,
Codorus and Hatboro soils (1.2 acres), is confined to the Storys Creek floodplain and has a slope range of
up to 2 percent. It is frequently flooded and composed of loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock (USDA 2017).
Geology. The Piedmont was formed by volcanic activity and is composed of sedimentary, igneous,
and metamorphic rock irregularly distributed through the region (Ward 1983). The major geologic formation
within the region is the Carolina Slate Belt. This formation was formed by lava flows and beds of breccia,
ash, tuff, and slate. These deposits yield an abundance of surface stone suitable for prehistoric lithic tool
manufacture. A number of significant prehistoric metavolcanic quarries have been identified in the Uwharrie
Mountains, including several in Person County. Felsic metavolcanic rock comprised of mud- and siltstones
are accessible primarily in eroded settings such as gullies as outcrops are infrequent at this end of the
mountain range (Moore and Irwin 2006).
Cultural Overview
The cultural history of North America can be divided into two general eras: Prehistoric and Historic.
The Prehistoric era is extensive. It includes at least 12,000 years of Native American groups and cultures
present prior to the arrival of Europeans. The Historic Era, in comparison, is relatively brief. This era refers
to a time of exploration and initial European settlement on the continent through the colonization,
industrialization and emergence of the modern era. Fine-grained chronological and cultural subdivisions are
defined within these eras to permit discussions of particular events and the lifeways of North America's
prehistoric inhabitants. The following discussion summarizes the various periods of prehistoric and historic
occupation in the project vicinity.
Prehistoric Period
Paleoindian Period (12,000 - 8,000 BC). The Paleoindian Period refers to the earliest human
occupations of the New World, the origins and age of which remain a subject of debate. The most accepted
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
�., 13

theory dates the influx of migrant bands of hunter -gatherers to approximately 12,000 years ago. This time
period corresponds to the exposure of a land bridge connecting Siberia to the North American continent
during the last ice age (Driver 1998; Jackson et al. 1997). Research conducted over the past few decades has
begun to cast doubt on this theory.
In the past two decades, investigations at Paleoindian sites have produced radiocarbon dates
predating 12,000 years. The Monte Verde site in South America has been dated to 10,500 BC (Dillehay
1997; Meltzer et al. 1997). In North America, the Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Pennsylvania had deposits
dating to 9,500 BC. Current research conducted at the Topper Site indicates occupations dating between
15,000 and 19,000 (or more) years ago (Goodyear 2006). Two sites, 44SM37 and Cactus Hill, in Virginia
have yielded similar dates. One contentious point about these early sites is that the occupations predate what
has been recognized as the earliest New World culture, Clovis. Artifacts identified at pre -Clovis sites include
flake tools and blades, prismatic blades, bifaces, and lanceolate -like points (Adovasio et al. 1998; Goodyear
2006; Johnson 1997; McAvoy and McAvoy 1997; and McDonald 2000).
The major artifact marker for the Clovis period is the Clovis lanceolate -fluted point (Gardner 1974,
1989; Griffin 1967). First identified in New Mexico, Clovis fluted points have been recovered throughout
the United States. However, most of the identified Clovis points have been found in the eastern United States
(Ward and Davis 1999). Most Clovis points have been recovered from surface contexts, although some sites
(e.g., Cactus Hill and Topper sites) have contained well-defined subsurface Clovis contexts.
The identification of pre -Clovis sites, higher frequencies of Clovis points on the east coast of the
United States (the opposite side of the continent where the land bridge was exposed during the last
glaciation), and the lack of predecessors to the Clovis point type has led some researchers to hypothesize
other avenues of New World migration (see Bonnichsen et al. 2006). These alternative migration theories
contend that the influx of people to the Americas occurred prior to the ice -free corridor 12,000 years ago and
that multiple migration episodes took place. These theories include overland migrations similar to the one
presumed to have occurred over the Bering land bridge and water migrations over both the Atlantic Ocean
and the Pacific rim (see Stanford 2006). Coastal migration theories envision seafaring people using boats
to make the journey, evidence for which has not been identified (Adovasio and Page 2002).
In the southeastern United States, Clovis was followed by smaller fluted and nonfluted lanceolate
spear points, such as Dalton and Hardaway point types, that are characteristic of the later Paleoindian Period
(Goodyear 1982). The Hardaway point, first described by Coe (1964), is seen as a regional variant of Dalton
(Oliver 1985; Ward 1983).
Most Paleoindian materials occur as isolated surface finds in the eastern United States (Ward and
Davis 1999); this indicates that population density was extremely low during this period and that groups were
small and highly mobile (Meltzer 1988). It has been noted that group movements were probably well -
scheduled and that some semblance of territories was maintained to ensure adequate arrangements for
procuring mates and maintaining population levels (Anderson and Hanson 1988).
O'Steen (1996) analyzed Paleoindian settlement patterns in the Oconee River valley in northeastern
Georgia and noted a pattern of decreasing mobility throughout the Paleoindian period. Sites of the earliest
portion of the period seem to be restricted to the floodplains, while later sites were distributed widely in the
uplands, showing an exploitation of a wider range of environmental resources. If this pattern holds true for
the Southeast in general, it may be a result of changing environments trending toward increased deciduous
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
�r 14

� vUi U O � p y U O � � � O � c�C }�O-� N • � O tU U �+--+ U � U O � �' 'may � cC '� � v' ,�.' bA
�+' � u � � � . � � � . � � � U � O , *si � "" c� U �"' �, � ,7 v� �"i `� U � U � • ,� ,sem' y..�
O O � U ,s." s., y rn � .,� O U �• � U 5, p � ,s.' ,� � � ,s
Cd
ct U �72 y ��i �
U `C"'i �"j p Q> 5-� U Q) • --i U rl VJ p 3-I 3-I Cd ... "� U Y U . =
72
U N bA O p ^•�M Y Q U �O
U N U m U 72 61p 00 50 O
y 4-r "� `-� r--' • ,� O U U • � ' � 61 �"
R Ct
•� � U _o U
n UCty U O O O U y y U p% U cC U cCV O W
Ct U c� ap o O
U a; a W y U W o U U bA U U ° a U y bin U
41
.� y U s> U U by y •� y y o O
Ct
r,41
U cdY O¢ V" Cd �p 4 U O 4 U U 3 O 4 O
U M m o O w v1 O O y
bA -0 m bA by > U Ct
y O y Q, CC U O y U y U ;J S
Sri y..i Sri Uj U ti `� \ CC CC
U o U y U O Co
o U U y y
UO p o y c� c� m s by o: c, " to c� o U p y a> N
cC y.., U cC y U cC�'' ,�.' '2
o n o y cC
O /'Ejy
bA i' N cC
bA;jUp Or�iLcC" rz�yp
in,
in, O
U
oc O 0 3-i VJ Cd � y `"� C01 `� Cd y U Cn U �
`�' �--� U Y.
O cC cC U U y cC -i"ct U
bA y Q U >• o O U O>in,W bA .- r- U >, U U U
Cn
k in, ,� y U y • --� . --� U , U y bA ct c ct p v zi
ti 61
UctU ct. o U U a;10
y o vctct
U ° d
4� •� Vii y Vi "� CC OU ' �' U .� CC ' �' yVi .� �.i .� CC .� O 'y •� Q., CC U yp U ,4tiJ

o>
U
�
a>-��
M
,y
3.
U
y

W.
s 4 n g., U U C'� "0
45 Q,
UOcn
Cn
O U
UOU uo g,"
En
�t4-1
UO
Cn
UO
O
vi
o � �a•� o LUQ �
ti y y
y 5 sUUO
� r- U
c�C ,5 bA O U 0 V �
� iti CC 3-i CC Vi 10
UO y ~
♦~ N CSC 'O
UO
cn
ti Y
O
y0
b�A �
i -i Vl
Vl I� N o
� Z
O
41 41
4 bb
3 'E o
41"
H �
.ti
9

T
S
L
L
LI
4
> o
00
°
CSC °
Vl CZ
°
W
10
I� 10
U
y
UbbCn
,10
°
C
Uj
I�
Fn
p 41"

n y , n
O ,y
bOA UO
I O y
rn _
UO
O C cC
Jq
cn
. H
O Cn N
Cn
y
4 0uo ° O N
o�Ao¢v poo
y
o
a,

o O 41"N bA O N
O ~ b�A U BOO N o 41"
O yN Cd U} N¢ Cd y U o Cd
p O N y
41" 3.-I r� �: .- C) o' D,
v 41"> U N a> o UOo "" N -0 41" >
41 r
° a p O rn cC .- N p U O
o ° o ooc w o o h a, U us .4 (0-,
N U o ° � a > W � U ° _bh —
O cC U O Vl s ,� o ,� o o rn -C",
ct
ct
o� U ;J poo �° �� .- cr +� �U a o no y
y o a p p o
v° •� ~ o Z y 000 ~ `�
Q p V N cC O oCnuo C#0
4-r p � � �"' . � U � O U ,� � � � � �' � Cd �" ,s." y � Q -I . � �" p -i • � '� b" �' .cy O
U N CC CC bA O u t U ycncn
Cn
L7 o p p o y o raaz
o �
cn
UO U 41"
'y
Cn Q" d
a> v1 yuo
yh� o r--r--
CC U Vl .ti O ✓ O O Vl N cn
ct It
U U C;- Cd Cd �: IC — VJ Y U �--

A
U l
yU > O
U
O Cn .
pcct
ct
U s O U
ct
U cn u O
cC O y U
8' rct-
O U U
c
rn
s� O
SU.
3
V
UO lull
p S U
,Si
M ^
0
z E
0
�U
W
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
w
0
d,
N
O p U y
U
U
_ U �
El
O
�♦O M �
yy
O s U
O
Vl •'--� � Q
I --I QI
Y
U
o
O
�
U
�
O
U U p
tz-
Q
o
�
3
�
�
�41
a�
y
M U
ti
N
U
�
H
U
V]
V]
7
O
i-1
V]
V]
U
oc
U
-Q
m
.M -i
11 `°
.M -i
r--
oc
01
o
11,
11,
N
11,
M
11,
Q
11,
11,
M
11C
M
M
Mo
M
—
•--�
x
.--i
x
•--�
x
'I-
'I-
•--�
x
.--i
x
M
M
° u
o
N
O
d,
O p U y
U
_ U �
El
O
�♦O M �
� �
O s U
+
Vl •'--� � Q
I --I QI
Y
U U p
tz-
Q
o
o
�41
a�
M U
ti
N

l 06
LL
y
� mak• � t [�{ � � ' � �� d � d � `� ,,� �'.. .. � aJerS -
cu
1-4
4 # 7 "'F Y a a
�i 1 t.�� li,� ��� f�VF�r 3f� - n \..��1��• � � Z �
$ y
)�� ,1y \ n f ` j �. ]� � � � `" i•, Sao � Ji t. � t; F �--
�+h
x -if ff v v 1 'p 4- V, F+ a •'+ `Ir' . i Z 4 [
N
N

O A C
w
d
m
c �
c
QN cut Ptl WekS 1 V co
�
W N
0
n r4
Q1
a
5
Py 1Os4�ttupvp�Ile
Y
M
N
I�
'� I -•-�
�
Vl U
N
O
O
O
U
U
O
�
�J
Uj Y
oc
in, �
Uct�
O A C
w
d
m
c �
c
QN cut Ptl WekS 1 V co
�
W N
0
n r4
Q1
a
5
Py 1Os4�ttupvp�Ile
Y
M
N
I�

wo
N

N
m
M
i.
wo

The 1968 topographic map shows only one structure in Tract B which corresponds to the
southernmost structure shown on the 1910 and 1928 maps (see Figure 3.1). No evidence of the structures
appearing on the historic maps near Edwin Robertson Road in Tract C was present. It is likely these
structures were completely razed or moved.
At present, there is only one standing structure located in the project tracts. This structure is a hay
barn located in the southern portion of Tract C. The barn is modern and does not appear on the historic
maps.
Reconnaissance Investigation
The reconnaissance investigation of the two expansion tracts resulted in the identification of 13 sites
(sites A -M). Six of these sites (A -F) were identified in Tract B and seven (site G -M) were identified in Tract
C (Table 3.2; see Figure 3.1). All of the reconnaissance sites in Tract B were revisited during the Phase I
survey. Sites A and Bare historic sites and have been given state site numbers 31PR148** and 31PR152**,
respectively. During the delineation of potential sites C through F, it was determined that they comprised
a single historic house site. This combined site was given state site number 31PR149**. In Tract C,
reconnaissance site M was the only site revisited during the Phase I survey. This site is a historic and
prehistoric site given state site number 31PR159/159**. Site 31PR148**, 31PR149**, and 31PR159/159**
will be discussed in detail in Chapter 4. The remainder of the sites identified during the reconnaissance (sites
G -L) are located in the portion of Tract C that was excluded from development. These areas were not
revisited during the Phase I survey. State site numbers (31PR160**-31PR165) were acquired for these sites
and site forms were completed for each site. These sites were not delineated or evaluated for potential NRHP
eligibility. If the excluded high potential areas of the project tracts are to be developed in the future, these
sites should be formally delineated and evaluated.
Table 3.2 Summary of Archaeological Sites Identified During the Reconnaissance of the Project Trace
Expansion Tracts.
Field Site
State Site
Component(s)
Description
Map Reference
Number
Number
Tract B:
Site A
31PR148**
Historic
two stone and brick
-
chimney bases, one square
nail fragment
Site B
31PR152**
Historic
possible stone chimney
1938 Highway Map
base
Site C
31PR149**
Historic
standing double -sided
1910 Rural Delivery
chimney, scattered debris
Map
on surface
1928 Soil Map
Site D
31PR149**
Historic
low rock structure
-
foundation
Site
31PR149**
Historic
rock and brick chimney
1910 Rural Delivery
base and well
Map
1928 Soil Map
1968 topographic map
. h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
r 26

Field Site
State Site
Component(s)
TDescription
Map Reference
Number
Number
Site F
31PR149**
Historic
rock chimney base and
-
large excavated hole
Tract C.
Site G
31PR160**
Historic
stoneware, aluminum pan,
-
clear bottle glass along
stream bank
Site H
31PR161
Prehistoric
metavolcanic flake
-
Site I
Historic
whiteware ceramic
-
31PR162**
Site J
31PR163
Prehistoric
metavolcanic flake
-
Site K
31PR164/164**
Prehistoric/
quartz flake, two
1910 Rural Delivery
Historic
whiteware ceramics
Map
1928 Soil Map
Site L
31PR165
Prehistoric
metavolcanic projectile
-
point fragment
Site M
31PR159/159**
Prehistoric/
metavolcanic flake,
-
Historic
pearlware ceramic
���q� Inc. Project Trace Expansion Tracts
�, Person County, North Carolina
r 27

Chapter 4. Results of Field Investigations
As noted above, through background research and field reconnaissance it was determined that
approximately 156.4 acres (63 ha) in the portions of the project tracts slated for development had high
potential for the presence of archaeological resources. This area of high potential was subjected to intensive
Phase I survey, which consisted of the excavation of shovel tests at 30 -meter intervals along transects spaced
30 -meters apart. Transects were aligned with landforms. This was supplemented with judgementally located
shovel tests to ensure coverage of all landforms in the survey areas. A total of 442 shovel tests were
excavated in Tract B and 415 shovel tests were excavated in Tract C. This survey revealed that both tracts
have been severely disturbed by erosion. Shovel tests excavated in Tract B generally exposed 10 to 20
centimeters of A horizon soil overlying red clay subsoil. Erosion in Tract C is more severe, likely due to
more intensive logging and agricultural activities in the area. Subsoil was generally encountered between
5 and 15 centimeters below the ground surface in the Tract C shovel tests.
The intensive survey resulted in the identification and documentation of 12 archaeological sites, three
of which had been identified during the earlier reconnaissance (Table 4.1; Figure 4.1). Sites were delineated
by excavating shovel tests at 15 -meter intervals in cardinal directions from all positive shovel tests until two
consecutive negative shovel tests were encountered. These resources are discussed individually below.
Table 4.1. Summary of Archaeological Resources Identified in the Project Tracts.
Site Number
Description
NRNP Eligibility
Recommendation
ract B:
31PR148**
19' Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR149**
Early 19' - Early to mid -20' Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR150
Unknown Prehistoric Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
31PR151
Middle Archaic Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR152**
Early to mid -20' Century House Site
Not Eligible
31PR153
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR154
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR155
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
ract C:
31PR156
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR157
Unknown Prehistoric Isolated Artifact
Not Eligible
31PR158
Unknown Prehistoric Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
31PR159/159**
Late 18' -Early 19' Century Historic Ceramic Scatter, Prehistoric
Lithic Scatter
Not Eligible
1 -. ',
, ,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I 28

a / i
Tract C
31PR161
C_ ftp fi' 1 t ; , 31 PR162`*
_ 3iPR165 L
31PR1641164".
31PR769I159""
31PR160" f.
31 PR11 49"
I 111 y -J t�✓� _ rL � 4 {j� �
31PRi86 C> r �
31pR151_ _r
rt
+ - 31 PR 155
` 31PR153 Soo
i �
�- 31 PRI 5 l
Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Expansion Tract Survey Area
31PRi52"' - Archaeological Site Road
31P
1P R148'" 31RR150 {, - Recon Site (Not Delineated} N
1r fJ 1 0 225 460 675
� Y
t f
~*~ Meters
Figure 4.1. Map of project tracts showing locations of identified archaeological resources (1968 USGS
7.5 minute Olive Hill, NC [photorevised 1994] and Roxboro, NC topographic quadrangles).
ACC. ir.c.- Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
29

Site 31PR148**
Type of Site: Historic house site Soil Type: Helena sandy loam (HeB)
Period of Occupation: 19' Century Elevation: 521 ft amsl
UTM Coord. (NAD 83): N4038001 E678132 NRNP Recommendation: Not Eligible
Site 31PR148** was identified during the reconnaissance investigation of the tract and delineated
during the Phase I survey. It is located in the southwestern corner of Tract B, just north of the tract boundary
(see Figure 4.1). This site is situated on a wooded ridge top characterized by pines, mixed hardwoods, and
cedars and low to moderate undergrowth (Figure 4.2). The landform slopes down north of the site and a
drainage is present just east of the site area. Fallen leaves cover the ground surface in the site vicinity,
obscuring surface visibility.
Figure 4.2. View of site 31PR148**, looking east.
A total of 24 shovel tests were excavated in the site vicinity. Of these, four shovel tests yielded
artifacts from the upper 20 centimeters of soil. Two rock chimney bases were also identified during the
investigation of this site. Based on the distribution of artifacts and the location of aboveground features, site
dimensions of 30 by 60 meters were established for the site (Figure 4.3). Typical soil profiles from this site
consisted of 20 centimeters of dark gray silty clay loam overlying strong brown clay (Figure 4.4). The E
horizon is absent from the excavated soil profile, making it distinct from the expected soil profile for the area
(USDA 2017). This difference signifies disturbance to the area, likely resulting from erosion and modern
land use practices such as logging.
I -� ',
, ,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
r 30

31PR14$"" 15�
Site Plan
o Negative Shovel Test
r Positive Shovel Test Ulf
A Datum: N500 E500
n is 30
meters
•
C'Pines and Cedars
House Detail I
Rock f
;Chimney Bases O
2.1
0 10 ao feet
0�5 meters
Figure 4.3. Plan map of site 31PR148**
The site 31PR148** artifact
assemblage consists of eight historic
artifacts (Table 4.2). These artifacts
include whiteware, bottle glass,
nails/nail fragments, and an
unidentified iron fragment.
Whiteware was manufactured
beginning in 1820 and continues to
be produced today (Aultman et al.
2016). Of the four nails/nail
fragments recovered, one is a cut
nail and two are square nails. Cut
nails were commonly used between
1810 and 1890 and square nails were
dominant prior to 1890 (IMACS
1992). The dates of these artifacts
House Remains Site Boundary
C c
/10 a.
2.7
0
a o ❑
i
i
A
5
L
_. •
f *4
d55
sts
695
are consistent with a nineteenth Figure 4.4. Representative shovel test soil profile from site
century occupation. 31PR148**, looking south.
c� h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
31
_. •
f *4
are consistent with a nineteenth Figure 4.4. Representative shovel test soil profile from site
century occupation. 31PR148**, looking south.
c� h�Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
31

Table 4.2. Summary of Historic Artifacts Recovered from 31PR148**
Artifact Type
Quantity
Comments
Ceramics:
undecorated whiteware
1
post 1820'
Glass:
aqua bottle glass
1
light green bottle glass
1
Metal:
cut nail fragment
1
1810-18802
square nail fragments
2
prior to 18802
unidentified nail fragment
1
unidentified iron fragment
1
Total
8
Aultman et al. 2016; `IMACS 1986
The remains of a house, consisting of two stone chimney bases, are located in the central portion of
the site (see Figure 4.3). The northern chimney base measures 8 by 5 feet (2.4 x 1.5 m) and has a height of
12 inches (30.5 cm). The southern chimney base measures 8 by 6 feet (2.4 x 1.8 m) and rises 16 inches (40.6
cm) off the ground (Figure 4.5). No foundation elements or other aboveground architectural features remain.
A review of historic maps showed no houses in the site vicinity.
Figure 4.5. View of southern chimney base at 31PR148**, looking
southeast.
,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
32

Site 31PR148** is a nineteenth century house site. Two chimney bases and alight artifact scatter
are all that remain of the occupation. In addition to these characteristics, severe disturbance to the area from
erosion and modern land use activities have negatively impacted the integrity of the site. Therefore, this site
is not likely to provide new or significant data about the history of the area beyond the survey level of
investigation. Site 31PR148** is recommended not eligible for the NRHP.
Site 31PR149**
Type of Site: Historic house site Soil Type: Rasalo Fine Sandy Loam (RaC)
Period of Occupation: Early 19' - Mid -20' Century Elevation: 480 ft amsl
UTM Coord. (NAD 83): N4038453 E678541 NRHP Recommendation: Not Eligible
Site 31PR149** is located on a wooded ridge top in the north -central portion of Tract B. This site
was first identified during the reconnaissance investigation of the tract and delineated during the Phase I
survey (see Figure 4.1). There is a slight rise in the northern portion of the site and side slope surrounds the
site on all sides. Mixed pines and hardwoods with a moderate to dense understory are present throughout
the site area (Figure 4.6). The site is bounded to the north by a transmission line corridor. An old road bed
extends northeast/southwest through the northern portion of the site. Fallen leaves and undergrowth provide
little surface visibility in the site vicinity.
This site was
initially identified by the
remains of three structures,
a well, a possible chimney
base, a rock pile, and a pit
feature. Structures 1 and 2,
the possible chimney base,
the well, and the pit feature
are located in the southern
portion of the site and
comprise Locus A.
Structure 3 and a rock pile
are located in the northern
portion of the site and
comprise Locus B. A grid
of 71 shovel tests
excavated at 15 -meter and
judgmental intervals was
used to investigate these
features. Of these shovel
tests, 19 yielded artifacts
Figure 4.6. View of site 31PRI 49**, looking east. from subsurface and
surface contexts. A small
artifact scatter was also
located on the ground surface next to the well. Site dimensions of 220 by 75 meters were determined based
on the artifact distribution and location of aboveground features (Figure 4.7). A representative soil profile
from the site consists of 15 centimeters of grayish brown silty loam overlying 10 centimeters of yellowish
brown silty loam above a strata of orange brown silty clay subsoil (Figure 4.8). This soil profile is generally
consistent with the soil profile for the area (USDA 2017).
c� h� Rroject Trace Expansion Tracts
n Person County, North Carolina
r 33

]LfuLLUle 1 I LCM
Rnck F-ndmian
RDck
rChimney Base
° A
DT? Ofeer
l>,6 18nietna
Structure 2 Detail
Stalked Reck
Foun�atlan
t! 2i) 9olh�l
a 6 M
Structure 3 Detail
�+ Rptk PIL,
Rockandbrick
Chimney -' 19.0--i
16-1
R -k FddtNs
p 6 19me1as
31PR149** 3I'
Site Plan
* Negative Shovel Test ?
• Positive Shovel Test
X Surface Findlsf
-S Slope
❑ Datum. N500 E500
L7 15 30
Transmission Line Corridor ►
D D s,s
'1
❑ o I AlvaT`6 i� 0 0
tLk PRe -'�
16,1 : " YB1
a ° j1 F -�:r Il ° ° pia 4t9ada _ s,5
struet� 3 `
Locus B
_ i • 4 491
•
- YI
i
A
,ss
Locus
13.t
� 5[rulture Z 1
I » 1
�
■ '1 17.7 iZ.1
1 l
no O e* 8 1 • • J S S
'I ,,,M. 9,1 111.1 r
395
■ + 5Lrulwre 1 I
I
5-4 6.1 7.1 .Y1eLLi-
3!0
I
r
° O • ■ O
365
Ay 2.1 3.1
---- 1 r
Site Boundary - --- ---
Va D ❑ +
'� •
r�
aw
. Pt Siwe * pines and
5 Feature C11imney Gaye I
Hardwood
s
�
¢,0
f
5
5
I j.5
645
Figure 4.7. Plan map of site 31PRI 49**
Locus A. Locus A encompasses the southern portion of the site (see Figure 4.7) and measures
approximately 135 by 75 meters. Structure 1 is located in the central portion of the locus. The remains of
this house consist of a rectangular rock foundation measuring approximately 33 by 19 feet (10.1 x 5.8 meters;
Figure 4.9). The remains of a rock chimney base are present in the central portion of the house and extend
from the northern side of the foundation (Figure 4.10). This house is shown on the 1910 Rural Delivery
Route map and the 1928 soil map (see Figures 3.2 and 3.3; Hem et al 1928; USPOD 1910). It is also noted
as an abandoned house on the 1968 topographic map (Figurel.2; USGS 1968). Structure 2 is located
approximately 114.8 feet (35 meters) northeast of Structure 1. This structure consists of a stacked rock
foundation measuring 18 by 18 feet (5.5 x 5.5 meters; Figure 4.11). A break in the foundation, likely an
entryway, is located on the eastern side of structure. There is no indication of a chimney in this structure,
suggesting it was an outbuilding, possibly used for storage.
A number of features are located south of Structure 1. A well is situated approximately 66 feet (20.1
meters) southeast of Structure 1. The well is an unlined square depression measuring approximately 8 by
,'Project Trace Expansion Tracts
Person County, North Carolina
I
92

vn — N
N - ,," 41"
u _ p N
Y Vl
UO
Q,� offUyC#0UO
UO
uo
�x °
v p p o p i M Q
4a
41" COO
O
N '" u
y y O y p
opo o�� o o�c��•��� c�O°.�°a � � °� 41" �
wo
I
M

112,
N
O
w
u
U
O
i --I
it
wo
O
i
O
w
M

M
N
N
O
�
U
oc
0
o
o
oc
y
oc
¢.i
0
U
oc
oc
N
Oc
-
-
Oc
Oc
y
m
=
�oc
P
�,
.�
.�
.�
M
M
.�
.�
N
.�
ti
•�
.�
M
ti
N
N
ti
N
ti
a,
C6
N�
V
4.o
bD
bA
blo
N
tl;4
.�
t
bA
y
V�
bA
�
M

Y Yn '� U y '�
UO
m O ct Cn
L O 4 O � O n p
Cd M >`� e� cn `� Cd U y � CS
h� O C
y
S-^ Y •� ��'� U v� U .,U.i U
ct
ct
V Cd V O W 3 U bA U
i
Iwo
CC
N �
U
�
O
�
U
O
�
U CC 4 i ,y U
4P
l �
/y
pp
O
bA U
43
a
C6
�g" o
N�
V
O� c U
CC r-- 00
C6
O
E-+
U
4
Y Yn '� U y '�
UO
m O ct Cn
L O 4 O � O n p
Cd M >`� e� cn `� Cd U y � CS
h� O C
y
S-^ Y •� ��'� U v� U .,U.i U
ct
ct
V Cd V O W 3 U bA U
i
Iwo
CC
N �
U CC 4 i ,y U
l �
/y
U r -ti
bA U
43
a
�g" o
O� c U
CC r-- 00
Y Yn '� U y '�
UO
m O ct Cn
L O 4 O � O n p
Cd M >`� e� cn `� Cd U y � CS
h� O C
y
S-^ Y •� ��'� U v� U .,U.i U
ct
ct
V Cd V O W 3 U bA U
i
Iwo

10 U Vi —U �. "0 , U
Vl Q 3-i �i FL•Iy `J Q y y
r -ti y U i1 rl 3-I rl �"�
ct
y U �., � •. --i Uj `�° ' � ° �--� U Vl � 3 � � � � � � Vl 3-i � � r -ti yam.' • � � � ,.y
U 3 O N U cC c� y O 5 U U ct y M� Q
U U ani ami 5A ct
Q,--� O •--� U cC � � r--� "� � U H U � � � � CJ � •--� ,--� ;--� � r--� � N r--' �'' ,S' y �.'
a,
M
�
y V
V
�
N
Oc
U E
v m
d,
V1
U
�
U
cc
Oc
S.'
bA
C6
N
V
�
o
.44i
bbA
a,
M

zil
In
U
N
Y � U
4-i
,y
,
O Y ti
O
UO
N
ti U Y
O �O
U y
y En
O
Y
z
0
Oc
H
\.J xj
ti
�
O
y b
O
O
zz
Oc
y
U
0
71
c,
�
'R
�
4P
Qj
C6
d
Eb
Eb
zil
In
N
Y � U
4-i
,y
,
O Y ti
O
UO
N
ti U Y
U y
y En
c
Y
z
0
H
O
�
y b
zil
In

N v
N O
Oulu
Ct�
y
U Oc
�--� t
y
U
ct
N ct ,y
r—ti U0
U > 4
f", Oy
N N
3.-i N cC
cy rn
�
Q N 'o Cn
N O r--'
U ,y ct
NU
•y
gct"
• --�
Ctp
y N
cC ct
ct y U,
41
CA
ct
u
U0
ctu
It
> U
O U
U O
>
U U Uj
ct ct
. u
U
St
O
u ct
ct
U
U U �i
y
• ti ct ct
`� U
�
� r -ti
O �
U
YU
u �
o O
Z
N
Ct
ct
UJ
�[O
�O
41"�O w
u N w/
U0
t
N
U
ctU
U0
U t�l
y
O y
-+
U WJ
W
O •��i
y
US"i
F. p
U
U O
�i
�
�
U �'--1
O
O
y 'y �
y % O
� O N
b�QN ct
C, �
y
/''�
'
un s, 0 ti
�' N ct
"� ' .U0
tiJ

'IN
wo
E
O
O
3-i
w
rn
N
w_'tjii
�4 •
�} � '''� s'C
t
a
E
O
O
3-i
w
rn
N

r -I
tn
a
M
zil
u =
O
Vl
N
O
�
U N UO
N
H �7 a
H LM
C
y W
M
UO
N6
Qj
VJW
ct (t
a U O O v
y
w
O
uo
UO
VJ
UO
uo
U
y p p
M V) z ILL0
U U s "cn
U
Vl Y y Ey 7::$ ' Uj iti VJ
UO
Vl
UO. U
N
ti
'Cn O
¢I N U Vl N Y
y
y�i
N
5�5..
❑
❑
I
wo
.v
w
M
' 1
�
N
H �7 a
H LM
C
y W
M
Qj
o a
M V) z ILL0
i
I
❑
❑
❑
❑
OUl�
aj
01
D m
6ma;
m
w �'
•
.v
w
M

CC U U
,� 0 - O
O O y �
O ~ ct
O O ^41, N o
CIA U o
.0 O U "0 U
U
U
U .�
�4"
. n
'
ti
N bb.-
y
t�
u U
UO
O O
bb
Rj
b
CSC 00 ,y
U Rj
UO
ti Y O
c
a Q
UO
O U
O
CC
3-i
U Ri
bb
EnN
>
g",
n
zil
0
72
bio
W
O
.ti
tH
ti
�
U Y
N
CSC 00 ,y
Cd
CC
3-i
U Ri
O
n
U y
Q, O
Rj
zil
0
72
bio
N
CSC 00 ,y
Cd
O
Q, O
Rj
0
S U
41"
U
U
O > yU
bA
rn � ;.a
�rrvyyy'
.4
N
> w
�
CIA
U �
^
-0
N
v
m
M Ri
N
Si U in
C
�w
ti

r4i
p
v
S
ILI
b
a
w a
0 0
❑
��C7
❑ 4
.�'
❑
4
O o-
6� o ❑
M
C
v
C
0
R
tn
Grid North
P
it
nla eW
t
.
i
[Val
L ❑
'
CD
rC -
�c Q Ul
Ln U
M
0 (U+�
Lo
a
ro
rd R
-' -
to to
v ow
Z D. Ln O O
❑ • a
�2 N
.7
wo

•fir,
■T,
jL-I.
e
pp
,tid,
IF
j0%
{

M
tn
1H
F6�
1H
M
zil
cC "••� O
� w � U
•� � y y
��
U �41"
`� t}yy�l �y rC���t rrC-fit
VJ V� y
� � y
bA p ,byA �
U ���
U U y O• ti
��pML/�i
U ♦~ U W
Vl rn
10
Q�-I
>
ti
g Y
� �
U bh �0
-0
N
p y n
O r O bA
m
MC
En
i -i 4--i •'ti
� � U y
10 bh
Ep
72 .�
y
E y e� 41" N
4
VJ > y
Cn
U Y
.ti
O v a
41" .1- --
'-- h
--i
�""
•'� �--FSI 3-i
� '••i U
M
tn
1H
F6�
1H
M
zil
cC "••� O
��
U �41"
�
••� ,y
� � y
bA p ,byA �
Vl
�"
Vl rn
rn
-0
N
m
MC
En
41"
U U
Cn
U Y
.ti
cC cC
cC "••� O
�"
Vl rn
rn
U U
.ti
Jq
•�
ct
ct U
"f 'i C� U
F.
a
U O
�I r -ti
• --� � y
W �
U
cC
U p
d N
U
ct
U
p"
Y
ct 41"
a'

rll
�;
��
co D
C
�1
I
1
O ❑
�� ❑ D
�x
Grid Hart
I
En N
to
O a
C
d
y tll �
oQo
=Z
M as
L v
in
r a
C. �
r Ql
M V1 Za-in0
❑ • p
V,
ly ,
©1
w
w

tn
a
M
zil
uu�
—
a,
CC Qu
Q 3-i
�i
a
y�r
� Q O •� O
�
� � � Q
N
�
ti .ti
O
O � O �
� O
O � � •�
.�
in,
SU
U3 41
0
°
ct41"
a
d N
u41
C1
cn

i
r
► ►
2:.
G
R
m
d �
rJ
LA
CJI.
0 O
ort
o o
Ln
wo
m
o 0
Ln
UM
, t
i r
yrs N K
-z
c �pin
=
� C
eY a td
M V1
p
O m
o a
i
wo
w

kn
kn
a
r -I
M
zil
72
bo
wI
41,
o
N
-ti
Y U
r
i�
Q
�
c
to yl1uV
vl Grid North
U
O
Ln
LU C
6 O
wI
Q Q O\.
O D 0
a
Q
�
c
to yl1uV
vl Grid North
O
Ln
LU C
6 O
d
C/'! L lf7
C�
l.C7 f� N i
CL4-0 N
O • ❑
wI

E
wo
zil
0
72
bio
W
Vi U U CC '� U � y U iti CC
41"
�
r -ti bA U
M 72
w CC �1 ti
N p m
VJ VJ �J
. �--i VJ � � • � U N VJ
Ny
E
wo
zil
0
72
bio
W
Vi U U CC '� U � y U iti CC
41"
�
r -ti bA U
M 72
w CC �1 ti
N p m
VJ VJ �J
. �--i VJ � � • � U N VJ
IH
U .ti •O y U �i U
Vl Vl UU'� yUy.y 41"
3-i
PE
r.
M
it
wo
I
�n
w
N
Vl

'IN
4 cd
U U N N 3-i
9.
b
0
M
Vl
p� d
.n
N O
R m
�
;
5 ;
a in
ntf
L
1 Q
Q O O
O
a
`
i'
I, '
ry4-+
Grf Horth
i�
tin
F OJ G
QJ L 6 �
o c�
�'ao
LnN
+'
Ln � W �'
rL '-' E
W M 4-
r
r y
M Vl Zcl
0 •
'IN
4 cd
U U N N 3-i
9.
b
0
M
Vl
p� d

r-
tn
1H
F6�
r
M
zil
CC g-,
�:), U
41" �����
�
4",�
o U o �
��
O
.ti
Cn
Vl
Q y
U
Q
Qj
cn
Q
O
Y Q
~
_ CC
V OO
41"
U
•TN,'i �
p
�
C

10,
0J
S -II
Grid Horth
Ln
0
I
Ln
N LU C
Q C:)C7
0 Ln
r,.
{�
a!S -r— Z
W [J7
m
r
7 ..u7
a
onLn
r
ia-
10,
0J
S -II
Grid Horth
Ln
0
Ln
N LU C
Q C:)C7
0 Ln
{�
a!S -r— Z
W [J7
m
r
7 ..u7
a
onLn
ia-
❑ • ❑
rl I s f
Ile
��F:' r t� 4 -9Q�. � �'iF• � � 1, . . ;i� •
7p7 if
� C : �F • ��� �..i.N-cam-'
� .5 •.i t � , . + u r pit^ . 'r ir: ;,
i.�i�' • �� ! ,jam ! r . •.r" - - a
N

00
tn
1H
F6�
r
M
U
zil
lullIt
N CC
ct o
Uo Cn
Cn
H ct r
o cn ct
41" u
N ,S"
U
r cC O y
vs O
Y
y
O �
U
U �
o
O
o�
�z
M
N N
y � �
N
O
> N O
U O U
N 4",
t
O > UO41" y
v
O uo
Cn
d O
'y O r7
C ~
UUO
wo.'-
uo uo o

Y
N t:
5
O
bA
wo
y O O rn rn U rni rn �r v' ,sU.' ,s: �' O v' v' cC ,S."
y Q, � � � "� "� cC � O � • O � � � O O � 00 � U U O U
> y O
�� bA c>C Q, U N r O N O v
a> m bA a> � 41" U y
> U
c�C N c U U OU g",
cct . O �U OU
U U U O D U O U Vl
aEll
c
t7f] N Q •09
O
* y° C V�
Grfd North
�r
N o H o
LLI
4a • Q C�'7
_CL � c raa
Ln Ln
m Ln w
+ v iC CL u V �
{ } V j (a
1V/ M O!m Z to O a
O 7C ❑
� � V
wo
a a

U
0
wo
CC U U v� r--' U bb ,� ,s: U r--1 U U U Uy� 4--+ V� U
U � �' C� � C�
C U M O O O U s
>
Uu
U �
p y o y o o O U
yU U l� O yip U O y O En
N
cn g -i
O O cn U
cn
n
U U N O U
U 41"
C-0 cnct O cC
4
bA a O ha
Ut 4
U
41"
ct
ct
•" ai
bb;� ct a
\
y ~ "
ti •ti
Uj
41" n
O
G V U O
ct ct
ct U '�
c OC U. u
oc
O Q,
U n cC
vii ct
U
0
wo
CC U U v� r--' U bb ,� ,s: U r--1 U U U Uy� 4--+ V� U
U � �' C� � C�
C U M O O O U s
>
Uu
U �
p y o y o o O U
yU U l� O yip U O y O En
N
cn g -i
O O cn U
cn
n
0
U Y
U
�
U
\
U U O U
U
� O
♦ Vl
U Q --�
O �
U
ct
0

O U �� U O s c� r"
CIA in,
Q a o o Jq s~
E
wo
wo
N�N
a
�ir[Roatl--------------
..-O
--_---___------.---------
p 4)1---------•--------------
�
Q
o
�+ m° m a c
~ rB
K r1�•t
91
9 ..
C yr
LLJ
Ln y
Q
Q
-0r
0 C5 _.. �
VI C Ln
LL S
v
..
us (D
m
�u E-
CL a�[I y
+�-r
O
-
M y"I VI p
0 x9
E
wo
wo

A 1"
2
®� c =
7 (\�
c•_ m
� 6 ��
o ®G §
� o @
cn
41"
wy�
z
\�� a
E /
.9 •/
/ƒ\�
�
662/6
�ƒ\\A
E\O
t]
=ge o
22
z

I
un
bb
41" bb
v O O N un10
bb
y cC n U O bA
OC
p O O U ti U O W y E
w U
U U Q
1010
CD
^p 9 bA U n
10 7-1
y
N � cl1 U N U �-,, ,moi m
�10CD
cn
M ti )
10
z UD z Ell
-(Zt
Q �Zo-(ZtUD
.�
10 41"
to
10
o o o o ti ti vs °. to
°' o .� m W 4 z
Vl O U CC CC ,�-i ,S: U O U
W ^Z o � C'�blo
cn
��'• � ^� � a'�, �� � � � �W � �"Q � � °''�, � �w 'y vs � tea,
ooM c��oo�� �oo� ��U ,��WQ ,.�t�0
Way Woo ti ON d o Q oo Q oo a> � t� a1, moo
a�
CN CN o ON ON ti o a, a, a ON
m
�--� O N�i .--�i .--� N .--i �"i .--� •--� •--� N C
� � ocl� o O? ti
O O >ct
> N N Q o
�._
y 4 U

4 ti N
bloto
0
,V
N N ti0 a O
E-1 [� O O
p N U O U 4Z �ct O Q
ct
v U °
cn
y s N O p 41" U '10 bA
+� ,y � ,� �, �Un
ti its G� G� 0 b-0 ti 0 z
z un CIA
O C) 0 bpm O m o z
ct CJ "'� O r--� .O v„ m �,;
V1
�NEll-> `�' aw `� o� �� °'10
°'�'^ o m z
cn
10
m >ti vs .m ti F
b-0 N
O
�� En 41"�
GNU � �
61 61 61 O O 61 61 061 61 61 061 O1 61 F' 61
N N
bh
bh

U
Un un
N oc
un
41" CD
ON
un in,
41" un
10
41
ani o,� 10�-�
x On o o aU> Q o 3Q�y
10
U Q El
� r� �t `r 41" o o
by
bh10
P4 O SU-I CJ U W
O o p 2in, OA o W A 10
p p 10
N U p
O
Oo p U.�i- w O >
N U
10 U Nj ti N a O
sU y U O U O v
Z St UD
in,Ic
o
Uoo �
a� a� Q oo a� o a� a� a� a� o
ct
JllO
Q w w w w w C7 C7 C7 'x

06
un o �� -- '.Oz
• b 0
� � N bpA O � � • � O � � ti ,� r" � � �
Q m o Q oo
blo
un o >
a tiA ~ -Z0 0 o o
Iz
to
Cn
zn UD
CZ
ct to
to
V1
wU U N
lull� �'� � W � u�.� °�''� ter' �n,U•�
o� ao �U 0v
O O i/1 M O v o p o m
U oU ti ;� an oC' ti o w
� �z
O
�a1 &a, o 7:1, SCD �W a> �N Wt�t� w�UUQ mac, �U X61 a
a o N y o a, a, a, a, a, N a,
41

•,� � � � �O' � ^ O' � ti � �"' �' ,moi 4a l� � Vl
U U '� • BUJ- cd � O � � � � � � U �' N x � � P••�
U O W V N N
Cti O D U O U O m 0
41"
?10 41
Cn
b Oun
y
No ai o o Q
o � • � U � � W a> � N lull cl�
ct
ct a> a>
cn
, N ,S"i ct U
u ct
u ct
u ctO oU Q'
U m O O O 0.'
U s Q m O .4 N;j cn m U U U
U
to
� � O N O 4 3
U CY O
O M � � .� � � .� � � � '� �' � .� � O U ;� O U "ti0
U Q' b � N O _ cC bA O p M
b-0
to
ct
" O �D bhin,��
O O �! 4. Q G CJ S N �+.',� �+ � y bA s s v
r--� ' �--�
n
to CJ
N U b
rj"00N �- bAO i N un
�N N �� N Q� Q� C7N U� UN
cC cC U U U U •'—'--� •'—'--� O O U

o
lullcto
W W ° ct
a
ctctcn
ct
o U N °
ct ct
ct
ct ct u
ct ct
ct
ct ct ct u
ct
ct
ct u
N ° cZ Q y Z o U o U vs
v ct
U
ct
ct y ct U o U
o ct° ctct
ct cn ct ct
oo Wcto °
ti o QH W° o vs�D vs�D o
lu
p U o o a �
ct ct
ct ct
o toU 10
un
pZzvi�
> Qo `� >
O 00 00 61 '
61 O O O 61 61 61 61
--� C� N C� •--� �--, •--� .--i .--� •--� N N •--� •--� •--�
5 r-•--�
U U � �
bin
�
0
0
0
0
°
o
�
� y
U CC
o 41"
N
W
0
oU
°
F
o�
�a
�
q
�a
v
�

U �
pct �� z� +
ct ct
ct
u ct
Cn
I�ct ct
ct Ct >
ct
Q, U ct
U V1 ;-1
O
ct
ct y U U ,�-08
ct
o ° ct
y
cn
un - �� Uo �5 � ct
It
�cli N U�D
lul° `� o W ° o Z Q o 0
to U
c� O
c�C U M N
?UD zz�
, u U V1 pp y - l� ,�
p N' v U N ct Ss ct
y Cu) uOC
CD CD CD
N �N �N �N � CA
N
h 10 10
�D �D
U
�
>
bA U
s_
o �
t�l.ti 41"
�
~ N
y0
O
E-1
O
41"
a
o "
�
O
45
U�41"
,S-i" �, ,s
U
Z
CZ
U
o
QN
N S
,S:
v
N vi
p
U
U
m
•--�
•--�
h..j •--�
H4
h..j •--�
H4
•--�
•--�
41"
C ti

N

0
0
N
0
'C
m �
U
C G
B
0 0
U °'
0 — O
C, W
O w
o w U
ca��z
w
en
M
�U Gil
.0
a G' z a E E
z
W6
o U
a
00
U
O
E
O
U
N •� �
�
w
�
o ca¢azz
w
o en
0
o
N
o
O
T
N
U
o cazz���
N
w
i � p
o
�
N
z
i
o
U
a
ci
0
'C
m �
U
C G
B
0 0
U °'
0 — O
C, W
O w
o w U
ca��z
w
en
M
�U Gil
.0
a G' z a E E
z
W6
o U
a
U
E
O
U
O
O
o
o
o
O
T
N
U
o cazz���
w
M
M
z �
o
�
N
d
ci
q
O
z
i
IL
U
a
0
'C
m �
U
C G
B
0 0
U °'
0 — O
C, W
O w
o w U
ca��z
w
en
M
�U Gil
.0
a G' z a E E
z
W6
o U
a

C7
0
0
R
N
C
o c
N m V v �c l
N
0
E
0
�
�
w
O
w
w
o
Cl
G
Cl
u
x
o
caa�z
w
en
o
en
N
m
oo
m
•�N��
c
u E
�z
E
E
z
z
r��
� —
N
m
o
o
U
a
U
a
N
0
E
q0
0
w
�
w
o
Cl
G
Cl
u
x
Cl
caw
w
O
en
v
z
�
�N
N
ri
oo
m
c
u E
�z
E
E
z
r��
� —
N
m
o
U
a

3 ° °
°o❑' c. o
U
o
c
-o
U
w
O
0)
O
O
O
C,
�
3 y rx o°n
,n
on
o
N
00
°
o0
o U
o
F] U
�
E �Q �x
�
a x
o
° 3
U
a° 3
�o
O
°
,
z
U
a°
o
U
i-%
N
U
N
3
'C
N
E
o
Wo
o
°
E�
C7
ou
-tin U
00
ca
¢
bq
a
N
o z
w
z�
G7 G7
Cl
41
E
z
o
U
a
U
o
c
"-
�z z
O
U
w
O
0)
O
M
C,
�
3 y rx o°n
o
N
m mon
°
o0
o U
o
F] U
N
E �Q �x
C
a x
EN.E
° 3
U
a° 3
�o
U
N
v%
O
0)
O
M
00
00
�
o
°
N �
� o
F] U
a x
00

h
�
W
O
�
Q\
Q
y
U
0
U
a
N
�
y
o
o
o
a
O
� '
N
EyU
b 3
O
W
O
w
o en
U
�
U
D
y
U
0
U
a
N
�
y
o
o
o
a
U U
O
w
o en
m
00
N
c
CD
a
z
i
N
m
o
U
a
A
N
N
b�A

0
0
N
0
0
N
0
0
N

O
U
�
O
Oc oc
N
ti U+
N �
0 O+++
a� 0O
U
i
�
N
U
r.a 0 r:+
y
•�� U
Cy" •�V.
�

N

0
o
�
4z N,U
9 8 t 8
°
o
°
U
o
(�49
� m � G c�
�O Z
• �, '7"
cC
"'
c�
'�
' �
U
�
C�
Vl
z o
1
o
U
w
d opo
°o
c�
'cJ
C�,
�
�
� �
O
� i• J•
�U�jj �
�Uj
�Uj
U ,��j'
,�'
U �
. �
�
� �
�' e3
�
Q
o
W • on � o
oIn
'ii
�
� m
� o U p
i --i
[�
o
�
p • �
� �,
W
�
o b'n
d o d
A-
Z
oN
N
oN
o
tom.
Fv
O
O � �
� � 6�A
W vUi
�
v'
�
�
�'
rOi�
U • cUd
o
OO,
0 �
.Uy ,
ISI O Q', p
c�Q
Fil `� p
A Q ¢
bAf-
W�w

� o
�
O N
W
a� U12,
0
7� 7�
�
a� U12,
u
�
m
�
bi
bi
O
°
'�
x�
Ud �
0
O
o O
7S
o o
10
U
w
U
o
a�
o
CU
`r
o
a�
••
Ln
'o
o
° � by
o
ct
bp S�
U
O
�
Ocn
U
. -d �,
�d
w O
C*lCt
Lno
°
v
o
° O
U
p
ct
r w
N
N
M �
�' d �/ �
Lr" O
d
� �
U O
"� H
Cid"
U
�
p71bIJ
"' -C
o
U
U
U
7S
U
�' O
;U4
U
U
O
Ct
7�
lull
Ln
°
s-
J
O o
°
'
Q H
Q d
cn cn
d
cn w cn
H U
U

0 Q
X
0 O
Z LL.
W Z
CL -
a �
Q Z
Z
O
N

>,
W Zv O ❑ v v Ids '0 Pt
a N N � o ❑ ns „d a� aqi 0 7:;
kY++.aec� , vni Q ❑ �, ❑ 4 r� O v r� �" � cC W 'D5
o' ''z U qi ❑ v P O 'dg's O '❑ O
°J c� w U
r.
*'L,3
10 avid 3 O -a o 2 ID � ❑ �
n � � �'" bR "rf � ❑ 4� � cd '� v
01
P4 m
zs
❑a�
on ani ca O ,0 m
con U
cd
cd D 'C
Q p N a Q vvi 'C
CO
�I 1 "r U Q �v" v v v❑ v u7 L)
❑ 'r bU ^' " �,.-' ra
U �+ _ 0.7 [d tom.. v P. y �. � �
x rW E aicl
ami UUcd � U- s . .0 o
`"ate ,, � .� +� ; E: C;3 �
Ga G ❑ ani 0 0 °� '� bb ani
W 0.4 ° o
a Sa. U OJ ... O C] cG U N U U
00
t"
O
6]

v } bio m .: ^ v
v v .� a v C," '� N •� Gam] N 7 . ' ❑ >C v s' Cts
v
41 q
p �' +� -d v �s a, a x�
s� v n D `� g n O pzi
ami sC *'
v s v 'd bU CCto
CU
th
bo a
1 3
}' ❑ >, .� R' m u, r¢)n m ° to [G e� ❑ ° ~ pvj
v w y zi ': ❑ a C„ mcn Q] C �
Zi
.� MV
-�5 v t., v v +, 0 v v v v %:Iq_
po
aj V c� �+ 4--4a�'�
bo
to
o id E" DU LO o U z 0. bn. = °U
❑
4 a g:,,by WR d7 U R rn , cn�+' Cd r -a) IC3
sa
C/3 mej
lt�>a >gb�'z to v N N a[d Cd
cd
a 4� U
ao] 7
tn un
o
'° v �! U s - > bvA y 3o R'' '� � v ❑ a v °' ❑
"-i ren �r '.. 7 . �", 7 m C7 fa, �, 0. P.

cd.A> Cy] rn a3 Q OeC v] lb 4] a 'd C
Q7 " 0 j rUr -.t"'- �+ 7s a)OJ OJ S Uj f,•/ Q Q 2 i�Ui � C -.p � �
tn
to
05
' o ff .mss O �, Z °' °' °
° aoi' y o d o un
o
GO 7s 0 0
eC U w .0U Q Q 4) 7 7 U. b 0 y +m Ln "Q cn
14
m 0En 0
C:) Q° +� �, cd .s4
+r > a� a
o �
U n' cz, U U u' tom.., � � � °� 3 c� }' "r °� 'v � a • � °� �
0 En
CC ami Q Q "Q cn rmn U y 'd �' C1 +, ° m ¢ 'd L9 Cl. U ° ° t� aS
a s, 4� 3 0 �+ rua�j �� by 0 0 � � G] 'r_ N ° G 9
N 4- Ql 'r�� U 0 w. F' [d 'd d Ca + u r. Lr i. TS N �+ Q] [C
-Q Q PL. Q m 'G U W cd 0 •.. Q] �
m ?U 0
R' m -r -r 'C-4
*Ej-` [C'tj; 4 41, � �7 � Cd � •� G°+, 0 � Q �. 0 'a �
rrr .� U cd Q G] Q] U s._
Cd
ai s°' ;.F a, ° �' • ayn a°a Q ' ° `" ° °
U mto Do
C�s 0 cG G] [] ai . cG r. -0 '. rn U t; '0
75 M
P: 0 El"�.��. .;�� °� - oma" °
to
3 Q7:1
a,U
0 m rn3U > � a.0Q �, �U 3 dYn CO) a� a� x 0

�-a O v o a Q ..v,
v Dani
cn
+� Q +� N
� U � a �'+ b '� 0] r�i7
cd a v A O "� ed v
c] W cn
CIS cn
C O D 0] 71
N v Q + D
L' "D y � G]
un
vLo
Cd
a v
o w 0 a U to
�U� aU�D .5°;
oo �'" 0 a a 04
• � � b b U � q � ea -d
z
z pin
aha .,U ^�' d. a,y N
� � x a� � ❑ LIO
N 45 v
? ? o
to F' �' (In� ¢ o ¢ a v
�-� a aF 3 a an ry`� u
v 0� a �_ ° 2
a�
En vi En v cn
U IZ+

kn
Z
D
Q
W
CL
v
LD
Z :.O
M r4a
U �
Q
LL
❑
Z
a
00
❑ lY}
Z �
a �
W
Ln a
Z
1
r4
LU
H
Z
N}
W
Vf
m
U-
0
Ln
W
J
d
x
W
4-
nA
C U
ai
E ❑ ❑ -❑ aJ
Mo
ar d m
ro � CL
�UCL ❑
�
QL1 0 U (v S
L
N ❑ ❑ ❑
v L NN (J
4-0
M ❑ L ++ v "' C u
❑. L lin 4
C r6 C 'd .� U '6 N
rC O. -❑ ❑� r6 0 o
.S EL _5E ri U
■
a
i_'l• L
Q, tto
4-1
to jto U C C C 'u -0
M Ln
N
Q y N �* U •� d L u -❑
❑ v v 4-- N U N N
ro
ro
Coouo
'0
Q] �--❑ L_ L _ .� 11'1
'rn 'ro m al a!
❑ L- ❑ ❑ rs x ro md N Q al
U U U U w w—
■ • • ■ i ■ • •
-D ❑ = G s6
al C-
r�+
aC] d m � aJ
C C U SO 'Cf
❑ c sa
+�
a E E "' E E
❑ a ra :
a] x al 4-1 `❑ rho m
�
py a ❑
0) w w Ln CO Nl E E
E
>-
o
"O
❑
ro
C
�
❑
'a
❑ai
C
+1
al
L
�j
[0
U
N
w
C
C
❑
❑
C
v
C
❑
��
OC1
U
v
L
N
[6
❑
w
in
Ln
❑
Q
Ln
4�a]
L
❑
E
-Ln
STS
v1
r6
a+
.N
N
riy
+'
p
0
❑
al
0
_
'L
=
.L7
C
w
w
E
—
-�
-❑
-0—
w
Ln
E
D
s6
❑
N
vii
C
.0
+-'
j
a
m
U
N
U
i,
Q
C
ro
C
❑
i'6
al
(LI
.—
bo
D
L]
N
^
"a
C
w
dA
fl1
o
-0
Q
,L
60
m
❑
LO
U
r6
L
a
L
❑
L
U
Z,-
N
❑
w
C.
N
LA
U
❑
r6
ro
C
Q]
u
ro
C
❑
L
❑
4)
7
Nads
a]
�
E
r6
A
i
C
00
Q-`❑to
O
CL
!.
M
ro
D
°1
aLl
E
m
N
:3m
LL
OJ
S
al
—
o
>
cu
i]
CUl
❑
w
7
Ln
00
r
-0
r6
ro
-0
Ln
w
cc
'>
w
r
-W
Ln
In
cc
N
O
'}
N
4.
L
L7
E
r
v
L
❑
c
_0
4-
c
LA
�-
*'
U
�
L
:3
C
Q
En
y
w
C
C
❑
E
w
v1
N
=
C
y,
U
yr
N
C
C
7
w
+,
ai
r6
y
N
C
al
t
o
N
❑
Q
tn
U
°'
a
VI
Gp
N
}
0
❑
L
�
-�
N
tw
Q.1
L
sYi�
al
J
D
++
CL
❑
M
Q
>
7
}
r6
'a
Q
-D ❑ = G s6
al C-
r�+
aC] d m � aJ
C C U SO 'Cf
❑ c sa
+�
a E E "' E E
❑ a ra :
a] x al 4-1 `❑ rho m
�
py a ❑
0) w w Ln CO Nl E E
76
41
+1 N
to
J � v
r • •
U
41
L
� � Q
-
tW 41
(p L
Oi 'L Ln
al 7 "C3 L d
.> �-+ U -r- lu C +N+
DL Qa 4 ❑ m
D- } a �s a.
o0r�'�wE
N fl N u U r6
cn Q. -d C E_
++ C E
i [4 f6 ❑ C
L
w vi 'iE aiL
m LA Q L >
U r6 C U W w r6 ❑
a) '❑ -0+1 CL a1 C
4- t a L C
0 a Cro
a1to " +' t w
C ra � +.� m
C
W
CL Q. O aJ ❑ N
❑ ❑ 0 7+ V7
w 7 7 aJ `d w ro
r -0 -a ❑ m > ro t
a4
-0
o
L
L
�
❑
❑ai
C
+1
U
N
bD
C
C
C
v
3
❑
L
ro
}�
U
d
❑
N
STS
.N
TS3
N
i
*+,j
a
Ln
L
C
-❑
E
N
s6
u
m
i
a
w_
U
N
Q
C
ro
C
❑
❑
(LI
.—
bo
u
L]
w
U
u
ro
do
❑
,L
60
L
"
.N
.N
U
r6
L
a
L
❑
L
U
Z,-
N
❑
w
C.
N
LA
U
❑
r6
ro
C
Q]
u
ro
C
❑
L
❑
4)
7
Nads
a]
�
E
r6
A
i
C
00
Q-`❑to
4-1
u
!.
C
❑
C
m
N
❑
S
++
Q
>
>
N
--
C
❑
Ln
00
r
-0
r6
ro
-0
u
w
76
41
+1 N
to
J � v
r • •
U
41
L
� � Q
-
tW 41
(p L
Oi 'L Ln
al 7 "C3 L d
.> �-+ U -r- lu C +N+
DL Qa 4 ❑ m
D- } a �s a.
o0r�'�wE
N fl N u U r6
cn Q. -d C E_
++ C E
i [4 f6 ❑ C
L
w vi 'iE aiL
m LA Q L >
U r6 C U W w r6 ❑
a) '❑ -0+1 CL a1 C
4- t a L C
0 a Cro
a1to " +' t w
C ra � +.� m
C
W
CL Q. O aJ ❑ N
❑ ❑ 0 7+ V7
w 7 7 aJ `d w ro
r -0 -a ❑ m > ro t

a,
L
a
aj
ra \�
U
L
C=
0 U
� u
-D C
❑ m Cro
E E
a
LU
LL
❑
Ln
LH
J
C
a
X
w
Q)
a]
*+
L'
a]
`�
4-;
i7A
q)
aJ
QJ
N
7
}
r6
0
E
'L
4-
'i
v7
7
4-
U
_7
L
❑
.7
C
aE
41
N
LnU
�"'
7
❑
U.
V
L
L
L
a
U
C
Iri
-�
T6
L
CIA
❑
❑
mi
cn
77-
[4
LO
i
Q
aj
N
T
Q�
Q
m
U
•C
U
U
U
N
N
Q]
+�
,L
rc
V
a--�
'�
_
r6
❑
a--�
'�
a.+
W
[L]
a
'�
m
QO
c
0i
N
C
4'
[]
�
L
❑
f+
',
w
rn
OA
m
N
CL
r6
M—
`a
�--�
7�
t
0]
N
M
r-=
[0
w
..0
cn
i
N
r6
'0
r6
C
ISS
y
Ln
N
-0
-0
=„
Cn
I'6
.N
w
ai
co
0�!
=
-
Z
v
,
i
to
+��+
Q
❑
� ;
rL
p
L
yr
7-
�
Q
aaj
N
r
tli
p
+1
�
N
v
•L
L
U
N
a!
,
❑
7
cu
++
T
Q"
❑
rS
m
U
L
V]
ay
vii
�
�
•L
-
s_.
aJ
c�a
re
Q7
C.J
Q7
+,
❑A
+�
�--
r0
a]
t
0ipCL
tll
Q
0
D
�
M
�_
'J
�_
w
QNJ
+��
❑
3
❑
rCL
p
>~•
0
L4 -
L
C
N
N
OA
7
W
-
M
7-
0
v
(v
�
❑
U
L
ro
+�
+,
rLv
++
(V
a
?-
f6
+�
7
0
+'
N
m
DO
rp
L
(D
2
r=c
-a
a
ar
v
c:
rCc
4,
QC
w
a,
Ln
c
❑
E
�
N
Cu
zz
O
0
N
C
C��2-•
7
C
N
Q
7
V!
a)
L
W
i
4'
CLn
ui
++
>,
O.
F
7
N
C
•�
L
c
C
L
y:_
-0
G
aJ
m
m
ai
QJ
a}
❑
C7
(SS
-O
Q7
O.
N
=
+N+Ls)
Q]
C
C
❑'
a1
-0
Z
..0
N
N
Q1
++
CGC
C
E
Ql
C
C
C
❑
+-+
++
C
+.+
u7
r6
a.+
Q1
C
L
t6
L
L
C
U
w
4
N,
N]
❑
�-
CU
ra
-
in
❑
❑
[�
u
N?
w
n
u
rp
is
�'
a'
n
w
a
L
+'
vi
a
*�
N
w
[C
�
1
L
❑
❑
CD
N
aJ
N
aD
0"
.0
y,
N
N
❑
N
1~
tl]
�_
tv
C
7
a�"+
�_
-�
U
'�
U
aj
'l1
i
L
❑
Q
,�
V7
�j
o
Zi
Q
CU
+�
to
G
a
to
•L
G
aj
r6
N
aj
Q.
�;
_
CU
�
rC
'
°'
U
rp
N
-O
U
i]
•�
rw
m
E
Q
'�
-❑
L
.L
Q)
o.
=
w
Q
U
0
❑
ro
++
❑
p
+,
r4
a�
ra
E
-�
❑
r
*'
a
ra
w
r-
z
C
E
m
n
in
a
u
n
°J
o
E�
c
w
o
n°s
m
n
o
to
-0
¢�
Q
LL
tA
Lu
o &^
z
❑

-❑ RO Ln ❑ V)
❑ U :. r- 0 U m D
m N ra Q) M4J L r= -0 170
C1A = U i { U C L •� CC (D ❑' rn ❑ aj CG
i cu rx..l ❑ r6 LMO C U D
.N E a 0. Q1 L3 Rl V7 LL �yj❑ E C 0 CN 0 [nLn
L @❑.,
v<5 w cc Q V .N ❑ L c In �� Q�� C C
i fl1 N 4- ++ N
N ❑ J ❑ N � rB Q.! t70 = i M Q' : U m
CLQ N ++ '❑ t7 C i i a. L L U m ++ N +, CLQ ❑ ra OJ Q Ln
is C dA t +• U I- U
d 1 Lnrn L] a
D
=5 U- ra
m C c0�
QV1Lr]OQ
❑ C
C7 d ❑ d tl0 Q D d s❑ tm D D. : 'a V
Q]
Ln
't=f
C:ro
❑
Q1
i
C
c
F
'
C
L
co
❑
~
N
"O
N
O
N
ai
L.MO
❑A
=
m
�
'
+-
U
U
r4a
Ln
N
O
O
❑
O
D
D
a
v
r
❑
m
4r
]
cm-
D
❑
D
Uajaj•-
EC
Ln
*1
y
N°
-
+
m
v
m
O
L
N
v
.L
U
N
N
Ln
qNj
L
N
>.
aj
N
a
L
❑a
❑
U7
'L
'^
�
°
U
W
LO
m
L
O
C
L
CL
,
41
w
WD
i
+ -
U'
m
ru
N
N
mU
❑j
a
�
Q
r6
m
4
vL
p
N
D
i
ruwa
_UO
�
—❑
C
—
❑
ru
�
N
•
n
�;
Dtoy
D
❑
a
ai
s
vi
n
m
0)
n
++'
U
S
+'
p�
y
cin
m
U
D
m
L
N
L
Q]
j
7
ti
^�
q�j
C1]
+
a
r'V
_7
❑
-D
N
[a
?'
41
'�
+'
O
.c
Y
+'
L
'0
�
i
2
E
+L+
L
M
•rte-+
E
N
`a
o
4�
.m
oy
Lin
°'
�
o
°'
�
`�
U
o
t
N
w
-a
U
,�
N
o
0
a�
+'
a`�i
°
m
w
o
?�
_
—_'
�
_�'
}
N
sn
°�'
C
D
m
i
C
.O
s
C
Ln
rLo
7
�,
+,
m
7•
0
�
OCLQ
3
.n
C
rn
m
+�
-
*'
�~
w
N
c
c
N
❑
N
>
m
'¢
Cts
a
�,
OLJ
D
N
N❑
BOJ
m
+�
+-
u
�_
U
Q-
cli
U
r6
N
N
N
E
aci
.�
M
C
j
❑
ar
v;
++
N
+,
OJ
1
,4,,,
C
m
I-
LA
■#
O
OJ
++
E
>
N
sG
Gf
u�1
+�+ sv
N
a
C
m
fa
ai
4
O
❑
s
V!
vi
N
E
M
cn
L
ay
Q
m
m
`�
❑
Ql
Q
`�
p=
Ds
a
m
m
v~
v
N
C
O
V)`D+
+7
Ol
C7
DL
D
ON
s
tl❑1
N
c
4
ice+
m
H
C
+�
N
N
°' a
Q
+�
};
H
❑
c
o
Q
a
❑
++
m
• =
pNj
N
v
,�
-r
ra
LA
°+'
°CJ
.,
-°
m
❑'
°c°
D
N
++
+�
+'
C
Q
v
iti
7-
i
❑
N
'L
L
L
-U
as
o
L
-❑
C
�_
�
c
mC
a
°
❑
N
E
�
a
,]..
L
+' VY
L
N_
Q.
SC
-
ai
a.+
.N
.y
L
L
Q.r
i
v
•y
C
m
+N+
cu
L0
to
Q.1
Q.1
w
L
N
d%
Ln
.�
QL.1
❑
0
'L
+
,n
N
C
a
L
N_
ca
c
.N
L
U
N
Ln
(V
l
�
'❑
N
•� �_
U
N
•E
CLQ
N
Q%
❑
Dl
a.
-D
r17
U
Q.1
=
-°
.�
..❑
NY
[a
Q7
❑.
L
ra
L .v
❑
N
Ql
aj
�=
m
U
[a
d!
L7
U
OJ
01
N
❑
q1
Ol
C
m
❑
❑
C
Ql
N
Q
�"�
7
•L
QJ
D
Cpm
L
❑
0
7
m
C11]
c
z
❑
m
N
U
i
i
rB
.�
[�
E
N
L..
L
L
L
L
N
0
0cr
N
Q
�--�
.
Q.
Q
Q
Q
F-
U
4-+
❑
Z
d
ma
P
LZ
C
Q.1
Q
N
Q
4.1
a)
.�
a
C
Z.
7
N
m
EE

primary establishment. However, when such services
are provided by separate establishments, they will be
evaluated as either light or heavy industrial in their
own right. If needed, Person County Planning and
Zoning staff should rely on the NAILS' activity
dimension to differentiate between an office activity
and a factory activity for such establishments.
Industrial operations involving the manufacturing,
processing, fabrication of acetylene gas (except for use
on premises), ammunition, explosives, fireworks,
gunpowder, or matches shall not be allowed in any
district. (Amended 5/18/92)
A special use permit shall be required for industrial
uses not specifically permitted as a "Use -By -Right"
in any district except Residential (R).
I, Brenda B. Reaves, certify that I am the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of
Person County, and that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from the
minutes of a meeting of said Board held on the 6th day of September, 2016.
WITNESS, my hand and the official seal of Person County, this the 31st day of
October, 2016.
CD
.r. 0'3 -.. ..p.r
..
Page 8 of 9
Brenda B. Reaves, NCCCC,
Clerk to the Board

APPENDIX C
TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
(Amended: 5/18/92; 11/17/92; 4/4/94; 7/11/94; 2/19/96; 6/3/96; 7/8/96; 5/5/97; 12/6/99; 5/4/2001; 12/1/2003;
6/6/2005; 11/1/2004; 11/19/2007; 11/3/2008; 12/1/2008; 4/20/2015; 9/6/2016)
• Industrial and manufacturing operations are allowed as a use by right or with a special use permit in any
zoning district, except Residential (R). Please see NOTE 2 for additional information and standards.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right are indicated by "X". Districts in which particular
uses are permitted as a Use -By -Right with certain conditions are indicated by "X" with a reference to a footnote to
this Table.
• Districts in which particular uses are permitted as a conditional use upon approval of the Board of Adjustment are
indicated by "C". See Section 73 for details in obtaining a conditional use permit.
• District in which particular uses are permitted as a special use upon approval of the Board of Commissioners are
indicated by "S". See Section 74 for details in obtaining a Special Use Permit.
PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
RC
ACCESSORY BUILDING
X
X
X
X
X
ACCESSORY USES INCIDENTAL TO ANY PERMITTED USE (SEE NOTE 1)
X
X
X
X
ADOPTION SERVICES
X
X
ADVERTISING AGENCIES
X
X
X
AGRICULTURAL OR FARM USE EXEMPT FROM ZONING ORDINANCE
AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND SUPPLIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X*
X
AIRLINE TICKET AGENCY (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
AIRPORT OPERATIONS (SEE SECTION 92 AND NOTE 5)
S
S
S
X*
S
AIRSTRIPS, (PRIVATE) /HELIPORT WITHOUT COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY (*SEE NOTE
8)(ADDED 5/7/01)
X*
X*
X*
X*
X*
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PACKAGED, RETAIL SALE
X
X
X
AMBULANCE SERVICE OR RESCUE SERVICE
C
X
X
S
X
AMUSEMENT PARKS
C
X
ANIMAL MEDICAL CARE (INCLUDING KENNEL OPERATIONS
C
X
X
ANTIQUE SHOPS
C
X
X
X
APPAREL AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (MAJOR) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
APPLIANCE (SMALL) SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
ART AND CRAFT SUPPLIES
X
X
X
ART GALLERY
X
X
X
AUCTION SALES (EXCLUDING LIVESTOCK AUCTIONING)
S
X
X
AUTOMOBILE OFF-STREET PARKING, (COMMERCIAL)
X
X
X
X
AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND ACCESSORY SALES
X
X
X
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR AND/OR BODY WORK (EXCLUDING COMMERCIAL WRECKING,
DISMANTLING OR STORAGE OF JUNKED VEHICLES) (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
AUTOMOBILE RENTALS AND LEASING (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
AUTOMOBILE SALES, NEW AND USED
C
X
X
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION OPERATIONS
X
X
X
BANK, SAVINGS AND LOAN COMPANY AND OTHER FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
X
X
S
X
BARBER OR BEAUTY COLLEGE INSTRUCTION
X
X
X
BARBERING AND HAIR DRESSING SERVICES
X
X
X
BED AND BREAKFAST INNS, BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSES, AND TOURIST
HOMES
C
X
X

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R B-2
B-1
GI
RC
BICYCLE SALES AND REPAIR
X
X
X
BLACKSMITH
C
X
BOATS AND ACCESSORIES, RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE
C
X
X
BOOKS AND PRINTED MATTER, DISTRIBUTION
X
X
BOOKSTORES
X
X
X
BOWLING ALLEY
X
X
X
BRIDAL SHOPS
X
X
BUILDERS SUPPLY
X
X
BUS REPAIR AND STORAGE TERMINAL ACTIVITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
BUS STATION ACTIVITIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
C
X
X*
X
CAMPER/RECREATIONAL PARK (Amended 8/2/2010)
S S
S
S
CARPET AND RUG CLEANING
X
X
X
CARWASH
X
X
X
CATALOG SALES
X
X
X
CATERING
X
X
X
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SALES AND SERVICES
X
X
X
CEMETERIES - CHURCH OR FAMILY
X X
X
S
X
CEMETERIES—COMMERCIAL
C C
C
X
CHEMICAL RETAIL SALES
X
X
CHURCH, TEMPLES, SYNAGOGUES
C C
C
S
X
CLINIC SERVICES, MEDICAL AND DENTAL
C X
X
S
X
CLUB OR LODGE
C C
C
X
COAL SALES AND STORAGE (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
COLD STORAGE PLANT (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
COMMERCIAL MODULAR BUILDING (ADOPTED 5/5/97)
X
X
X
COMPUTER SALES, AND/OR PROGRAMMING SERVICES
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (*BUILDING, HEATING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE
SPRINKLER AND OTHERS) (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES) *amended 11/19/2007
C
X
X
X
CONSTRUCTION, TRADES (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
X
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (EXCLUDING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR
SUPPLIES)
X
X
X
CONTRACTOR, GENERAL (WITH OUTSIDE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES)
X
X
CONVENIENCE STORES
C X
X
X
COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL FACILITY (ADOPTED 2/3/97)
C X
X
X
CURIO AND SOUVENIR SALES
X
X
X
DAY CARE CENTER
C C
C
S
X
DRY CLEANING AND LAUNDRY
X
X
X
DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY
X X
X
X
DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY AND GARAGE APARTMENTS
C C
C
X
DWELLING, MULTIPLE -FAMILY (SEE SECTION 80)
S S
S
X
EATING OR DRINKING FACILITIES (amended 12/1/2008)
X
X
S
ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES
X
X
X
EXPLOSIVE STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (AMENDED 5/18/92)
S
S
EXTERMINATING SERVICE
C
X
X
FAMILY CARE HOME
X X
X
X
FARM MACHINERY SALES AND SERVICING
C
X
X
FARM SUPPLIES MERCHANDISING (EXCLUDING FARM MACHINERY)
X
X
X
FERTILIZER MANUFACTURE (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R B-2
B-1 GI
RC
FIRE STATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS
C X
X X
X
FLOOR COVERING SALES
X
X
X
FLOWER SHOP
X
X
X
FUNERAL HOME
C X
X
X
FURNITURE RETAIL SALES
X
X
X
GAME AND SPORTS FACILITIES (AMENDED 5-18-92)
S
S
GLASS SALES AND INSTALLATION
X
X I
X
GOLF COURSES
C X
X
X
GROCERY RETAIL
X
X
X
GROCERY, WHOLESALE
X
X
GROUP HOME FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ADULTS
X X
X
X
GUNSMITH
X
X
X
HARDWARE, PAINT AND GARDEN SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
HEALTH SPAS, FITNESS CENTER (amended 2/7/2011)
X
X
X
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMERCIAL USE
C X
X
X
HOME FOR THE AGED
C C
X
X
HOME FURNISHINGS AND APPLIANCE SALES
X
X
X
HOSPITAL OR SANITARIUM CARE (EXCEPT FOR THE INSANE, FEEBLE-MINDED AND
ADDICTED) (amended 12/1/2008)
C
X
S
INDUSTRIAL
SEE NOTE 2
INSURANCE AGENCIES
X
X
X
INTERIOR DECORATOR
X
X
X
JANITORIAL SERVICE
X
X
X
JEWELERS
X
X
X
KARATE AND OTHER MARTIAL ARTS INSTRUCTION
X
X
X
KENNEL OPERATIONS, CARE
C
C
X
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR
C
X
X
LIBRARY
C X
X
X
LIVESTOCK SALES AND AUCTIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
S
S
LOCKSMITH
X
X
X
MANUFACTURED HOME FOR TEMPORARY DWELLING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF
PERMANET DWELLING (ADOPTED 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 7
MANUFACTURING
SEE NOTE 2
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS A
(REV. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 6
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY -CLASS B
(Rev. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURED HOME (INDIVIDUAL) FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY - CLASS C
(Rev. 5/5/97)
SEE NOTE 3
MANUFACTURE HOMES SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES
1C
Ix I
Ix
MANUFACTURED HOMES UNDER THE HARDSHIP CLASS A, B AND C
SEE NOTE 4
MARINAS
X
X
X
MOBILE HOME PARK BUT EXCLUDING ANY MOBILE HOME SALES (AMENDED 11-17-
92,7/11/94)
S
S
S
S
MOBILE HOME SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
MODULAR HOMES (AMENDED 11-17-92)
X
X
X
X
MONUMENT SALES
X
X
X
MOTEL, HOTEL OR MOTOR COURT OPERATIONS
X
X
MOVIES, VIDEO SALES AND RENTALS
ix
ix 1
ix

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
RC
MOVING AND STORAGE OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
X
S
S
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT SALES
X
X
X
NEWSSTAND SALES
X
X
X
NONHAZARDOUS, NON-TOXIC SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL (ADOPTED 5-18-92)
S
S
S
S
S
NURSERY OPERATION (PLANT) -AGRICULTURAL
X
X
X
X
NURSING HOME
C
C
C
X
OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (ADOPTED 12/6/99)
C
X
X
X
X
OFFICE SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT SALES AND SERVICE
X
X
X
PAINTING CONTRACTORS
X
X
X
PAVING CONTRACTORS (amended 12/1/2008)
S
PAWN SHOP
X
X
X
PET SALES, EXCLUDING KENNEL ACTIVITIES OR OUTSIDE STORAGE OF ANIMALS
X
X
X
PHARMACEUTICAL SALES, RETAIL
X
X
X
PHOTOGRAPHY, COMMERCIAL
X
X
X
PLANNED BUILDING GROUP (SEE ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 80) (ADDED 12/1/03)
S
X
X
S
POST OFFICE
X
X
X
X
PRIVATE RECREATION CLUB OR SWIMMING CLUB ACTIVITIES NOT OPERATED AS A
BUSINESS OR PROFIT (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITIES FOR PROFIT (AMENDED 5/18/92, 7/8/96)
S
S
S
S
S
PUBLIC RECREATIONS (SUCH AS COMMUNITY CANTER BUILDINGS, PARKS,
MUSEUMS, PLAYGROUNDS, AND SIMILAR FACILITIES OPERATED ON A NONPROFIT
BASIS)
C
C
C
X
PUBLIC UTILITY STATION, BULK STATION OR SUBSTATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
C
S
S
PUBLIC UTILITY WORKS, SHOPS OR STORAGE YARDS
X
QUARRY OPERATIONS
S
S
RADIO OR TELEVISION STUDIO ACTIVITIES ONLY
X
X
RADIO, TELEPHONE AND TV TRANSMITTING TOWER
(SEE ARTICLE VII & IX) (AMENDED 11/6/95) (*SEE NOTE 9)
S
X
X
X
S
RAILROAD STATION OPERATIONS (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
S
RAILROAD YARD OPERATIONS
S
X
REAL ESTATE AGENCIES
X
X
X
RECEPTION CENTERS FOR RECYCLING
C
X
X
REDUCING SALON CARE
X
X
X
REPAIR, RENTAL AND/OR SERVICING OF ANY PRODUCT THE RETAIL SALE OF WHICH
IS A USE -BY -RIGHT IN THE SAME DISTRICT AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
X
X
X
REST HOMES
C
C
C
X
RETAILING OR SERVICING OPERATIONS
C
X
X
SALVAGE OPERATION/JUNKYARD - COMMERCIAL
S
S
SECOND HAND AND SWAP SHOP SALES
X
X
X
SCHOOL, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC (ELEMENTARY, SECONDARY, OR HIGHER LEVEL)
(amended 12/1/2008)
C
C
X
X
C
SPORT SHOPS
X
X
X
STABLES, HORSE (AMENDED 4/4/94)
X
S
X
STEREOPHONIC AND HIGH FIDELITY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
STORAGE, COAL BY PRODUCTS
S
C
STORAGE, FLAMMABLE (amended 12/1/2008)
C
S
I C
STORAGE, HAZARDOUS, TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE
NOT PERMITTED IN ANY DISTRICT
STORAGE, HOUSEHOLD AND COMMERCIAL
1C
Ix
Ix
STORAGE, OPEN (amended 5-4-01)
1C
I C
Is

PRINCIPAL USES
ZONING DISTRICTS
R
B-2
B-1
GI
RC
TANNING SALONS
X
X
X
TAXICAB STAND OPERATIONS (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TEACHING OF ART, MUSIC, DANCE, DRAMATICS, OR OTHER FINE ARTS
C
X
X
X
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION BUILDING (Amended 6/6/2005)
X
X
X
X
X
THEATER PRODUCTIONS
S
X
X
X
TIRE RECAPPING
X
X
TIRE SALES CENTERS
X
X
X
TOBACCO SALES
X
X
X
TRAVEL AGENCIES (*SEE NOTE 5)
X
X
X*
X
TRUCK STOP
X
TRUCK TERMINAL ACTIVITIES REPAIR AND HAULING AND/OR STORAGE
X
VARIETY, GIFT AND HOBBY SUPPLY SALES
X
X
X
X
WINERY (ADDED 11/1/2004)
S
X
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION OF BUILDING AND REMODELING PRODUCTS (REVISED
6/3/96)
X
X
X
X
WHOLESALE SALES WITH OPERATIONS CONDUCTED AND MERCHANDISE STORED
ENTIRELY WITHIN A BUILDING AND NOT OTHERWISE LISTED HEREIN
X
X
X
X
NOTES TO THE TABLE OF PERMITTED USES
NOTE 1- HOME OCCUPATIONS
(Amended 9/7/94, 3/18/96)
A home occupation is an occupation carried on in a dwelling unit or accessory building in accordance
with the following.
1. The use is an incidental use to the residential property.
2. The home occupation shall not generate significantly greater volumes of traffic
than would be expected in that residential neighborhood.
3. No more than one (1) person other than the resident of the dwelling are to be
engaged in the home occupation.
4. No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total heated floor area of the
principal structure shall be used for the home occupation.
5. One hundred percent (100%) of an accessory structure may be used for the
home occupation: (1) if located to the side or the back of the principal
structure; and (2) the total floor area of the accessory structure does not
exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure.
6. The exterior of any structure (principal or accessory) shall not be built or
altered in any manner nor shall the occupation be conducted in such as way as

q
910Z/9/6 33■VNI ■o gm■■VIdAi■§o) ■oS 3d
.g
D
\
E
.2
�
j /
E
3
k
E
2
o
\ /
E
o
/
\ 0 7
7
u
r
§
$
\
2
/
0
@
a
S
E
2 §
ƒ
3
0
7
Q
E £
In
R
u
k
.
E
E
r.q
—
E
2
/
CL
fu
@
S
-0
q
0f
k 6 3
ƒ
Efu
§
—
g
'a
2
± �
0
�
u
°
.g
r
�
m
�
m
/
W
§
D
/
\
%
k
o a) 0
\
u
£
7 :
0
§
>
-0k fu
2
E
2
�
�
° �
fu
0
4a
C:%
fa
0
2
a
°
0
2
p
2 w#
r
$
§
a)
m
/
©
m
°
/
/
}
§
C
§
E
2
E
2
k.
2/
°
—°
7\
N
ƒ
k
_
:
b
7
2 E
D
k�
D
/
\
§/�
�
/
J
j
V)
k�
U
§}
k
./
u
G
a
¥
k
q
910Z/9/6 33■VNI ■o gm■■VIdAi■§o) ■oS 3d

N
W
I—
Z
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
W
N
W
0
W
a
a
W•
Q
t�if
L C
E a1 -a h0
a1 t u E E o to
tsA 7 Q a1
�n en Q O Y
`� O p a' >'
v o Q U v c—
C -a O i O '� '�
co •U co t�if +' 7 N
i jE a ++ E
C a1 O .� U "a L E
co O
L O a L O O
O ao -a E a U U
• •
E
•L
E
a1
L
U
•
a)
co
+� `o —
C co
co ++
a -a c
v c
n3 C
O a1 a1
Q
-a •E
O O a'
U U W
• • •
cc E "a CL C U
' 7
U co L aE "a
N � E O .0 n3 Q n3
c > -E a) a) .� +� o c o �„ a' E co
L L {� ++ _ U U Q a1
-a a) co 7 U iri C co .� O L
�n >� Q c L a1 >, O U ++ C t o f
o v E a„ a c o� ns
n3 co co +' OU a1 O O E "a +' a1 a1 to E
C ns c c O c U c U E U O C E t]A a1
O ++ ++ 7. L Q 7 7 b�.0 O C Q- Q ++ . C C
++ C c c co + U a1 a1 > C E a1 ++++ L -a
++ C co co co E a1 ns O a1
X v 0 0 C a) "a L O t O +�
W E E L U U .E a) a) +� co +� u cn m V)
• • • • • •
L
U
a1
C
co E
U a1
c}
L 7
i "a O
co O
Q- O
a) > C
L % to
•
>
v
U
0
a)
'L
N p
C
a)
—
w +' co U C
+�+ —
V) C
L U
•i U
a)
ow`0
a ��
�2
0
f�
a1 >i
-0
Lr-
a)
vim
a O v
*' c Ansi '>
z c
co
O
ns
vns
>
a O
a
v t a)
a)
��
>
ou
0
a) c
Q'
a1 co
co v
�,���
C O
E•f6�t�
++ a)
++ a1
f6 c
O L
v
cco
o
c °=�+�
U
C
c�
L
> U ns Q
Q +L+
p +' E v Ln 3
3
Q L
E
O_
L
v_ v
D
OC
C
a)
°
O
O
�,
S o
LL I
ns Z
a1 E ``� N 'n
a1 -a C 'a
t
O U
t
E U
O
`�
L L
v
+�+ V
C
a1
L
a
�
° t
0
M o
v v cco
v
o f
°
vi
L°
o
.F
.c
,��,
z
2
to
N
a)
-0 to
to N
n3 U •L Q �O w
O 0 0 +�+
C
++ 0
vUi
CL C
>
E
EO
7
C
O
i co Q O
-a c ++
++ >
a
—�'
7
p ++
C
co >
vUi
t
a)
U
t
—
W
,�
_
Q
>
° L
>, O
E
co i E
U
'L
U—
a1
E ++
Vi
++ O
3
L
E w
E ++
+�+
.�
CL
O
H
-
p
C
t
t
++
°
v n3 g
o ns t
Q- Q
> E a
>, >i C
co
v
v
0 ns
v'
>
2 •L n
a1
-a
,� L1
L
C
L O
L a'
co N
{n L C C vi
a) O 'in
U co ++
O -a
L t a1
O �n
a) co
"a L
O U
E t
a
a)
a
_
a)
+,
3
v +�
CL CC
co a)
L �
p ++ U
+, ns ns
M 3
-0 2
O
o a)
E
p
++
ns
a)
c +� c
H
t
co
>�
co
U
'a
a)
`4 ++
C
a)
-a �` a) L
-o u "'
'"—' > t
a1 O
+' ns Q
H C
M
�••�
Q 'L
o
`�' E
++
E
E
Z
W
v
a1 E
O>
a1
a1 O
C ,
U ns E O a
"a
a) t a)
++ ++ U
a)
ns ++ ++ t ,�
U C
U
=
O
'o
++
"a
—_ L
,�
C
oA
o
t
i
O
�
Q
Ln
O
U
75-
U
L C
C a) Q co -a
a1 i C
'L a) >i a)
Ln a) O
>� L
a) Q
"a
ate)
Y O
co
to +' •�
"a
z
�n
p
.�
C �,
° O
O
++
C
+L+
Q
L1 a1
Q-
7
Q'
co
++ co
�'' (n
n3 L h0 co
'U
t]A �'' C O a) Q-
L "a
++ C E
Q ��.,
Q
>j U
a1
a1 E
n3
E
n3 a1 7 n3
-a
z
N
L
L
co 7
++
U
a1
U
7 L
-a a1
-
co
a1 a1 L
a1 a) O a1
++ ++ Q a
C L
7
•E U
7
to
7
> O
O Ln
"a
L
+� h0
C C
O
n3
> U
++
L
++ n3
a)
L L C O a
U 7 O ++
u O ++
a
a a
a) a)
a)
w
a)
a a)
C
O
>, ns c
H
L a
p
++
`�
>,
�n Ln
i a)
Q
C ++ U to co
L O
U E U C C
a1 co C
ns
p
L >
U
O
C
'n
E>
n3
—
>,
L Q- > C
d
O L
+�
a1
co
L a1
O to
+� �n
n3
U a) ,� >�
O a) p
�n
a
pp Q
L
t
Ln
N ns
p
co a) co
7
++
E
>• t n3 C
U Q O co
C �_
'E C
Q
i~
U
C
L
E a1 d
'Q
N
f6
ns
v°1i
=
a)
c -0
o a
E '� � � v
+' � ou � v u
c `° E
O
c � °)
c
o
7 C
�
c
to C
�
coo
Q
W
L
U ++
O >,
U
a
co C
a1 C
to iri to ._ ++ U
L 7
,c Q
O L
L
ns C C
a' a)
Q
a)
Q
a1
C
co
C
—
n3
>--0
o
co
'T) E +� E"
�„� ++
+= a U E
o
c
*' i
E
L E
p
C E°
c
a t 0
ns
� O U c
0
v U c v _
c
O
n
>
'+�
++
> ao v
.f6
E
ao
+' C
+' co
-P
a)
C
co O C
W
+,
o
U+
n
-ala
a1 �
L1
U 7� $
S a a +�+ O_
"a c O
N U t
c
a
0
a1 a N O
Z
t
a) co
t
a)
ao "a
a,
Q co —
.E
a) ns 41 a)
a) U
cot co
+�
+�
o
,a
m
U
E
W
ao
n
+ ao
v
v
n
-0 u
> c
E
ns .0
+, cot
E E
v ns
E 3 E
.E
E
0
°
.S � to
H cn cn +�
H � w
a)
a)
a
v
ns
ns
ns v a
J
a_
LL
0-
O N
Lu
a
+L+
7
W
t
(n
z
h0
� �
J �

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
H
N
0
U'
z_
z
ON
o�c
U'
00
N
m
OC
x
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
X
x
IXI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
X
v)
(n
(n
X
X
X
X
X
v
{
O
X
1XIX
U
X
X
U
O
O
X
X
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
I X
O
x
U
x
X
x
(n
X
x
X
x
X
X
x
X
U
u
z
,O
r,4
O
c -I
°
U
O
E
C7
\
O
N rz
G
U vLn
O
U
o
i
O
O
w
m
Oirz
°
O
�
�
o c
O
X
�
O
m
C
O
W
0
L
+�cL
3
O
O
Y
U
LUH
O
O
Ln
a a
Z
Ln
O G
Ln wo
O
rz
z a
N
O
O
CC
O
0
R*
rz N
m .O
z O
0 0
00
o
L
o a,
v a,
O
U .�
CL
oN
v
a°
a .�
L c
o
\
O
o
a
a
N N
O Ln
�
O
O O
Q oLU
00
O
rz �
N
`n
-L
t--_
Erz
�M
oa
i
a3
i O
av
vv
-.rz
rz
CL
o
a �°
= -
cc
z
n
v
W
WN
°N
i
O
OM
•O
i .O
rl
CC
UU
O
U N
Z QUj
w
N
`ti c
w
Z
O. "CS
Ln
�'?
O v
(n
a
�—
a x
s v
s
a
MO
\ ON
U
t
V��
W
o
3 v
c
3 Q
c
3 Q
X
CL
��
=
o
Q
"CSoj
w
D
=L
CM
u a o
u
u a
Z
°
v
a
LU
c O
s
0
Ln
J
o
o
o
O
aj N
5 N
z �,
Q
.�
a
Q
E�
U
O
Q
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
H
N
0
U'
z_
z
ON
o�c
U'
00
N
m
OC
x
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
X
x
IXI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
X
v)
(n
(n
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
V)
X
X
U
X
U
X
1XIX
U
X
X
U
X
jJXIXIX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
X
X
X
X
X
X
(n
I X
x
X
JJXIXIX
X
x
U
x
X
x
(n
X
x
X
x
X
X
x
X
U
C7
Z
W
0
Y
U
LUH
Z
E
LU
oo
w
O
Q oLU
~
o
u
= -
Q
W
z
w
N
a
>
a
LU
z
0
U
O
Q
z
n
U
O
Q
z
°
Q
O
° v
Q
=
LU
D
z
z
-�
Ln
Q
�j
z�
z
`�
LL
O
z
Z
0
LU
Win
W
Q
D
�
NN
*
O
2
a
p
U
U w
W
I
W
O
Z
O
O
<
O
U
W
U
z
0
W
O
W
Q
D
J
a
w
Q
W Y=
W
z
°
z
Z
p
W
z
LL
a
N
S2
z
u
o>
V
}
=
Q
a
O}
Y°
o}Lu
z
_
z
Q
LU
oW
V)
z
��
Wz°oD7)("oaV)
n�
°
w
Q
z
in
W
>
Y
w
m
W
z
Q
J
N
(n
W
W
O
Y
J
J
Z
Z
J
�'
u
LL
�' O
J
Z
Z
O
O
Z
O
Q
a
U
W
U
�
Q
Q
d
Q
O W
Q
U
W
(5
V)
m
z
Q
a
W
(,
J
LU
Q
z
--
}
�'
w�
W
�„
z
H
W
C7
Q
Z
Q
L
Q
Z
Q
W
J
W
vi
Z
W
W
a
u
V
W
o
O
J
a<
W
J
a
Z
Q o
J
z
W
o
p
z
Z"�"LLW
WzW
LU
W
V)
a
Uv�i("�~a(�`-'��QV)
U
W
0
C:)
O
Q
J
U
p
J
W
LL
�'
a
Z
J
LL
W
°
as
i --I
W>=
QV,
Q
�-
aW
Wald
Q
o
N
DV5Qa���WLuauaacagLL
LU
W
O
Woa�o�()()(�Wza
W
W
W (D
W
W
W
CO
D
(:�
Z
W
a^
.�
m
W
U
Z
D
=
Z
G
w
Q}
�'
�'
J
Q
J_
J
J Z
J_
J
J
Z
m
Q
W
�.
J
Z
(n
J
U_
°
(.f)
U
J
Z
W
cWc
G
Q
U
W
U
U
J
m
m
m J
m
m
m
>
O
Z
m
a
O
O
O
DQ"'=
LL
H
a W
Q
g
J
W
J
Z
Z
p
J
z
0
0
0 z
0
0
0
Q
p
V)V)P
o°JWQ
LUQQzQo
2�
z(�
zLu
o>ocUz
V)aOum
aaa
o00
00oz�
o
oc
U
U
o
o
(7
J
z
z
a
a
a
m
m
m
m Ln
m
m
m
Q
Q
Q
W O
a
Q
Q
Q
Q
a
a
a
a
a
Q
Q
Q
Q
<1<1<
Q
<1<
Q
Q
<1<
m
Q
Q
a
m
m
m
m=

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
v
oc
C7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
cn
X
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
X
cn
X
cn
X
cn
cn
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
cn
cn
X
X
X
X
cn
cn
jX
jjjX
jjju
jju
jX
jX
jvjx
�jx
U
m
X
U
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0
N
U'
00
X
I U
I
X
X
X
I
U
cn
X
XIX
X
X
X
U
U
X
U
X
X
U
X
I
X
X
X
U
X
X
U
cn
XIX
X
U
X
U
X
Z
Z
O
N
OC
cif
X
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
X
U
cif
X
w
w
LU
LL 0
a
C
O
a
00
Z w
w
00
0
m a
G
d
O
Ln
=
W
D
W
\
N
C7
d
2
o
o
w
Z_
J Ll-
d
w
LL
_
z
W
=
v
u
�
O
W
CfJ
w
Q
U
Q
LU
E
m
W
U
W
0
Q
LL
r,
of
0
Q
V
_
0
\
U
J o
W
O
\
z
0
J
Ln
o'
W
W
o
Ln
W
W Lu
a
a
N
g
a
LU
0
Z
H
N
N
0
in
cn
Z D
0
o
H
000
N�
�_
O
O
]
\
00
�
�
00
0
LU
c7
z
(�
cn
O
w
o'
z
r -I
in
U
Q
Z
r'
W
a
D
V)
O
v
Z
LL
W
m
a
>
a
�
o
= 0
�
o
0
o
Q
U
o
z
Q
Q
W
N
W
H
-0\
Q
Q
0
Ln
�
Q
C7
W
'n
�
E
Z
U
X
v
z
E
}
z
w
N
a
N
C7
z
z
D
Z
H
D
Q
w
m
w
D
m
w
c
J
z
Q
J
w
in
c
a
°1a
Z
(D
pJ
O
p
O
J
Q
a
w
(D
v
H
w
Y
Q
_
E
-
5 U 0
=
U
"'
LU
LU
W
W°Cc�
V)LU
LLJ
Q
oa
`=��acoU
U
acn
oc
ZJ~�
J
w
z
in
--
W
d
Z
J
C:)
J
W
E
Co
:F .—
W
J
J
Z
J
Q
U
Q
Z
W
Q
W
(D
V
J
z
Q
O
(n
Q
Q
�'
O
(n
(n
J
J
Q
Q
Q
U
W
U
LU
Q
W
�'
5Q
<
W
Q
Q
W
S
W
W
Z
U
w �' i --I
w
Q
Q
V)
J
W
LL
Z
W
LU
Z
J
S
O
o
O~
z
O
LU
J
Z
U
Q
'n
o
O
Z
D
a
Q=
Q
W
W
W
LL
G
J
�'
Z
W
=
cn
H
>
U
O
-
(n
2
Q
�
H
z
Z
=
o
2
Z
w
LL
z
w
O
W
cn
}
w
Q
LL
Z
W
z
cn
Q
C:)
S=
1
O
J
J
d
0O
w
O
W
W
Z>
W
Z
�
Y
U
cn
(n
Q
U
J
U
W
cn
d
U
Q
V
W
Q
G
J
Z N
Z
0
0
V)
D
Q
C:)
O
J
Z
J
Q
�'
C:)
O
W
(n
z
N
V
U
Q
a-
V)
J
a
Z
Q
Q
J
Lu J
U
I
U
O
Z
Q
C7
J
Q
O Z E
O
�
W
w
O
Z
C7
Z
>j
w
0
Z=
Z
w
Q
J
oLU
a-
Z
U
p
Q
w
cn
cn
Q
Q
`n
H Q f6
H
O
O
U>
cn
w
Z
cn
H
\
Z
V)
Lu
2
J
J
Q
~
z
Z
O
Q
0
=
0
�'
Z
=
W
W
J=
OJ
J
U
W
U �' *
U
W
0
Z
Q
W
w
Z
Q
U
d
a
d
W
Q
Q
H
z
cn
cnQH\a
=
a
Q=
Z
�
EEQ
w
w
U
2
W
cn
Q
O=
H
w
�w�,mU
J w
Q w
U
Q
z
Z
Q=
W
Q
W
Z
Z
Z
OU2>
c
c
�Q
w
N
J
(n
cn
J
W
W
W
Q
0
J
U
D
cc
J
O
(n
J
J
V
U
Y
Y
Y
> J
Q
�'
V)
a-
d
�'
�'
J
G
cc
d
cc
(n Z
cn
H J
d
H>
Z
O
D
U
J
J
J
Z
J
O
�'
Z
u
Q
Q
O
O>
�_
J
(n
(n
G
�'
�'
J
cW
G
cW
G
W
Z
Q
G
G
Z d
F,
Z
Z d
Z
Z
Z
W
W
W
U
wc
G
oC
U
J
0
0
0
0
w
w
w
2
2
J
J
0
0
0
0
0 a m
0
0 m
0
0
0
Q
o'
Q
J
G
X
X
Q
Q
Q
Lu
d
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U cn cn
U
U cn
U
U
U
U
W
W
W
W
W
LLL
LLL
LL
LLL

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
ovc
X
x
X
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
X
cn
x
x
x
x
x
C7
x
JX
00
X
X
X
X
X
cn
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
X
X
cn
X
X
X
V)
X
X
X
X
X
O
N
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
z
00
X
XIX
x
X
(n
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
X
U
0
x
x
x
x
x
U
U
X
X
O
O
O
O
O
U
0
X
(n
X
X
x
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
z
W
I
W
W
W
W
W
W
OI'l
OC
U
U
U
I
X
I
U
U
I
I
Ul
N
LU
I N
LU
I N
LU
N
LU
I N
LU
(A
(n
X
LL
O
D
z
z
Q
m
a
in
g
g
in
o
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
u
J
Ov
a
a
a
a
m
u
u
u
Z
z
Q
LL
m
oc
O
O
O
N
(n
J
W
a
D
o
J
a
J
a
J
a
W
a
Q
Vi
W
o
C7
H
H
H
N
N
O
o
z
z
z
LU
z
LU
z
LU
z
g
u
=
in
O
=
Z
i\ -I
J
0
0
o
W
a
J_
�
�
J
V
O
N
r -I
W
(n
(n
(n
LU
CL
=
m
cn
Z
LU
m
<
J
n
N
�
u
OC
OC
OC
O
O
Ln
<
J
w
0
oc
O
oc
O
oc
O
,/
V
Q
J
N
a
Q
a
a
J
J
J
W
=
z
Q
N
ZLn
W
Z
J
d
C
W
U
Z
O\
a
a
a
z
W
=
°
u
Q
Z
z
z
Q
W 00
�'
(n
LU
LC 0
0
0
0
L� J
W
Q
U
�
V,°
p=
0
a
00
Q
zz
a
>
a
>
a
>
o
a
s
J
>
W�
O
z
o
W�
H
a
a
��u
a
a�N
Q
Q
W
�o
O
Z
Z
Z
az
D
U
W
cn
o
��
z
W
Ln
J_
J
O
W
z
W
z
O
c N
=
a
D
D
a
N
W
in
Z
O
Z
W
J
U<
W>
U
H
Z=
r -I
a
U
o
Q
W
S
W
W
W
W
Q
c
H
Q
a
J
a
a
"
�,
J
w
Z
Q
(n
a
0
a
a'
Q
(n
"I
O
U
C7
O Z
O
O
O
O
Co
G
Q
O
(n
s
(n
J
z
-
Q
�
w>
Z�
(n
°
N
7
Lu
U
a'
w
z
Q
Z
Q
x
x
x
x
O
x
Y
,�
J
(n
LU
J
z°
ago
JPO
z�V)aZZ
c
z�>
_°�
(n
aWZa
Z
a
a
=o
a
d
<LuLU
W
Q
Z
W°
Z
Ln
Q
O
W
Q
LL
W
�'
W
S
Q N
W
O=
°�°
Q
Z
W
J
W
R
W
W
W
W
W
LU
V)
LU2
Q°
J
O
V)
z�
d
0�aaW�="I
W
a(�a=`�=
m
aU�
a
0^
C
o�ww
JO
j°
,,,
o
,`��,'
O
=
LLA
Q
a
J
O �-
a
W
o
J
z
a
W
'n
Y
=
rn
O
O=
Z
0
a
�°
cn
J
za
J
D
o��
}}=�a(nUO�
Q
J
I,,ocz�
U
Q
V)
�a°a
a
U
U W
azaa�+
V
V\
V\
Lm
V\
Lm
V
V
m
g�
w
_
>
a
aU�
W
a
a
(n
U
W
w
a
=
LLLLQ
a
O
oJ�W(n��(n�Q>>�
W
W
J
U°
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
Q
W rl
W
�;
W
z
W
o
z=
2
0
0
o
z=
a°
2
2
V) o
D
W~
W
z
z=
W
z
z
z j
����>�zJrIJ>>
z;
z;
z
z
m
m
o
z
>
o
o
o
a
5
O
a
W
V)
0
0
0 0
z
m>
QQ
Q
Q W
v
Q v
Q
Q
a
O N
o
O
o
O
O
a
LL
LL
LL
D
LL
D
LL(D
0
00.
0
2
2
2
2
2
S Q
Z
Z
Z
Q�
a
2
W
Y
J
J
J
°J
W
c m
c
c
C s
c
cQ
c S2
c
S2
c
c
c
c
c
c
c Ql
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
v
v
oc
=
cn
X
X
cn
x
x
x
x
x
cn
X
X
X
X
cn
X
cn
cn
X
cn
X
cn
X
cn
cn
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
cn
X
U
X
X
X
U
U
H
X
cn
0
C7
cn
cn
x
X
cn
cn
cn
X
cn
cn
cn
X
cn
cn
z
a
m
jX
jX
jjx
ju
�jx
X
cn
X
U
X
x
x
cn
U
U
X
x
U
X
x
x
X
X
x
cn
x
U
LOU
x
U
a
N
m
X
X
of
x
U
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
V)
U
U
X
X
U
x
X
U
U
x
U
X
X
W
U
U
z
z
a
Z
~O
ON
oC
cn
X
U
U
cn
U
cn
U
U
cn
cn
U
U
X
z
a
_
U
J
a
o
0
0
=z
W
_
No
a
M
p
a
Z
N
O "'
LU
>
m
z
rl
a
Y 0
Z
N
w=
p
w
J
00
a
LL
a
a a
J
a W
V) �
W
Ln
O
p
O
,�
a Z
v
J
=
V)
w
pw
LU 0
0 O
m
(D 0
�
a w
�
Q
a
in
zZ
°r,°
p
W
H
Lu_
V)o
0
a
`"
W
�Ja
o
m
WLU
°`
0
J
o
0
Q
V)
00
t
p
D W
z
m
�
= "'
�=
}
D
W
V)
Q
m
U
LU
0
z0
H
0=
ma
O
H
0
v 0
p
o
N
o
a
W
W
o
W °z
0
z
z
J
N
w
D
w
m
g
a
a m
m
?j w
I
O z
J
Q
0
>
p
a
p
p
a'
cn
J
U U
p
J
O cn
rl
a p
U
Z
o0
V
v
_
W
a
00
0
°
=
>
U
O
U--
�
cn
z
o
H
O"
v
Z
z a
w
}
w
0
a
o
J
E
t]
a
o
V„
N
w
w
z 0
o
z
0
a
cn
Z �n
a
g
a
o
a
`=
a
D
p
W
J
J
U
0
N
o
p
g g
0
O
w
_
°1
LL
V)
cl
roc
a
u
as
N
>
g
�o
E
O
zO
,�;
z
W
N
W
o
p
W�
V)
g g
�
>_
g
c�
C7
z
C7 cn
0
U
JW
Q
r'
p
mO
`-'z
v
U
a
N�oin
�r-I
u
a�
�V)�
UZ0V)
Z in
<g
W
�,
�
�zg
oa
V
LL
W
aJ
J
W
w
a
w
cn
�0
a
a w
z
U
U W
a=
a
w
�
a
0
0
�V,
U�
og
W�a�
o v�aa
_ja
o�poV)
>g
Wad
�p�
��u
LU
J
X
Z
J
a
a
J=,
�
O
p>
~
z
LU
w V)
Y
LL
U
E
o
p
Ln
oa
a�
Z
�'
U
==
COC
v
U
m=
_�
W
ao
LU
cn
O
zam
J
p=p
�o�z
�V
�a
ZCV)
`=
YWw0
J �a�z
1V)
�pgW�
a
°C
�_
O=a=
zOp`"
a
)
�a
z
0
w
O
Ur
J
g
U f6
"
LL
D
O
Y
(n
z
z
=
w
0
°~
z
LU
re,
J?
N
aW
z
z
O
Z
cn
�,
p
�O
z�„g
a
C7
z
Z
V)
zo
��zOaXOWUV„apz
�z
o0
gpamoo
E
oc
V,zo
WzU�
o
J
o
O
o LL
o
oc
a
o
o
�nzcoo0W'-'-'za�
W -
z
a
z
=U
Z
>
��zWN
o
poo
a
zmg=W�
a
V
Og
_
J�;�
a
W
LLa�U
O
V)
a
=aUz
�o�0c�
a
a
=
w
a
w
a
,,,
V,�a
=
g
�WZ�
z
J
U}p
W a
Waa
a„>,O—�pOzo<
a
z
V)
p
a�
�UJga='Z
a
N
p
`n
0
p
w
a
0
H
X
=
J
W J
a
"'
J
a>
a
H
a
W
U
a
W
Z
>_ N
�
z
O
a
a
o
a
D
z
Z
p
a
0=
0
p
a
a
U
z
a
W
p
LU
a
a
p
m
W
v
U
w O
U
w
U
a
w
w w
J
V)
}
w
V)
z r
cn
w
0
a
a
a�
a
0
0
U
J
LL
2=
O
J
a
a
J
z
a
a
z=
O
0
U=
0
U
LL
V)=
W
O
W v
p
p
a
z
O=
w m
g
0
O
=
0=
_
=
w
w
W
w
w
a
O
a��O
a
a�n
z
O
V)
acs
o
LLW�W
W
�g
>>
�o
��aa�Oz
w0ZLU
O
v�„V„a
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
Z
U
cn
V,=
,,,
z
w
w
zz�
a
g
O
Z
0
H
aza=
H
U p
�,
U
U
OOa
O
O
w
U
cn
=
z
0 ��JWaaaaa
w
0
z
o?
7
z>
a
o
z
>_ �
>_
m=
J
m
J
m
aoo
JW=a=
a>OO
vim
==oc=
oc
o??
LL
LL
a
a
a
W==
g
�
o_=
�,
a>>=
a
a W
a
a
a
W
U
W
p
W
a a
W
�n
W
W
J
a
U=
W
U
o
a
a
W
o
0
0
0
0
a
g
g
Z
Z
Z
Z
0
O
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a m
a
a g m
a
a
C7
cn
cn
cn �°
cn
cn
cn
cn
V)
v�
cn
cn

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
U
V
U
C:
O
41
W
ra
Q
O
Z
O to
D
U
10
(
\
O
ca
a r
OC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
W
Q E
U'
Z
X
Q
X
X
X
X
X
O
X
X
O
�
jx
(6
jx.xx
O —
C
U
a..,
N
E
V
m
X
X
X
t
X
X
H
Q
O
(n
DL
—
i6
0
>
O
N Q
Q
0
N
z
m
X
X
X
X
X
L
X
-
X
N
.0
X
0
X
X
O
+'
O
N
++
Z
++
p
4-
L
Ou
D
0
O
ON
L
a)
N
(U6
L
OC
U
X
(n
w
L O
(6
L
(n
++
(6
+�
O
O
O N
O
tL
O
r6
M
Q
in
Q
a
0
+'
C
m
o
N
N VI
`�
U
V)
w
t
Ln
�
U N
O
tail
N
+�
N
ro t
O
O
_Q
O
+�
O
C +'
L
qA
U
C
t
-0L
}
f
+�
O
O
O
O w
V)
w
p
4-j
(6
L
N
D
N
O
+.j
4-+'
(6
O
Q
Q
o m
O
<
p U—
D
Z Z
L
N
v
0 0
4-
'01
U
O
Q
O
-I
O
O
LU
C
r�
L
L
OQ
U
E
z
-r
4-
N
N
0
U w
2
i
N
C
LL0O
Q
C:
W Q
a�
LU
ON
z
LU
2
D
O
(6
J
w
~
4-
a +
in
o�
4a
t�
L
E
O
W
a
aW
w
(6
o
N
'�
O
?�
O
w
O
Q
D O
7_0
X
t
o
U
N
o
-0z
N
-0
N
O
C
O
'L
2
w
LU
t
-r
+-
V
w
z
Q
CO
p t
X
x
_r_+'
J
N
m
U
Ln
l0
in
2
in
~E
Q
=
Z
Z H
L
Z
L"Cal
0 0
U~
0
z
a
=z
C7
a
J
<
Z
()o
o
=
in
z0 z
W
w<
J-
o
U
z
m
U')
LU
a
a
m
z
a
in0
w
=
w�
LL
0
z
0
~O
o
Z
a Z
0 0
V)
U
Z
w
>
CO
0
�
-_
�
a2rm
p
�
D
�a
(n
a
p
H
z
U
w
(n
J
z�
w
o
a
o
LU
Z
a
H
J Z
w
(A
O
Z
LL
U
0
z
w
J
z
Z
H
in
E
V) �
0
U
w
LL
LU
J
a
0mz��UJOQ��
V)
(D
�'
a
d
a
W
(n
0
o
W
0
a
J
a
J
a
a
Z
a
p
w
w
a
U
w
Y
Y
V)
LU
l0
V)
LU w
Z
Z
U
U
m>
U
U
0
0
Q
Q
w
(a
2
w
w
O
a
Z
2\
H
2 z
�:
d
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H>
�D
w
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
U
N
U
C:
O
41
W
ra
Q
O
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
U
U
C:
O
41
W
a
ra
Q
LL,
Z
O to
D
U
10
(
\
O
ca
a r
Lu
v m
O �
C:
0
L2*Z-
LLJ
faa
O
O 61
D
U
_
o
N
E
0
W
Q E
t
Z
Z Q
Q
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
U
N
4-jO
t
L
?�
_
O
O
L
O
p
O
(6
(6
O —
C
U
a..,
N
E
OA
Q
V)
L
t
N U
O
C
4
Q
O
(n
DL
—
i6
0
>
O
N Q
Q
0
(6
C
E�
L
Q
(6
D
L
O
-
N
.0
O4L--
0
N
t-0
O
+'
O
N
++
Q
++
p
4-
L
Ou
D
0
O
L
a)
N
(U6
L
O
C
w
L O
(6
L
U
U
++
(6
+�
O
O
O N
O
tL
O
r6
M
Q
0
VI
a
0
+'
C
m
o
N
N VI
`�
U
fa
N
t
Ln
�
U N
O
tail
N
+�
N
ro t
r6
O
_Q
O
+�
O
C +'
L
qA
U
C
t
-0L
}
f
+�
O
O
O
O w
O
p
4-j
(6
L
N
D
N
O
+.j
4-+'
(6
O
Q
Q
o m
O
N
p U—
7
L
N
v
0 0
4-
'01
U
O
Q
O
-I
O
O
C
r�
L
L
OQ
U
E
4 -j
C:
-r
4-
N
N
X
i
N
C
M
Q
C:
a�
a
D
O
(6
4-
a +
in
4a
t�
L
E
O
W
w
(6
: U
N
'�
O
?�
O
w
O
Q
D O
7_0
X
t
U
N
u
N
N
O
C
O
'L
L
t
-r
+-
Z
w
z
Q
CO
p t
X
x
_r_+'
ro
N
m
Ln
l0

q
910Z/9/6 33■VNI ■o gm■■VIdAi■§o) ■oS 3d
.g
D
\
E
.2
�
j /
E
3
k
E
2
o
\ /
E
o
/
\ 0 7
7
u
r
§
$
\
2
/
0
@
a
S
E
2 §
ƒ
3
0
7
Q
E £
In
R
u
k
.
E
E
r.q
—
E
2
/
CL
fu
@
S
-0
q
0f
k 6 3
ƒ
Efu
§
—
g
'a
2
± �
0
�
u
°
.g
r
�
m
�
m
/
W
§
D
/
\
%
k
o a) 0
\
u
£
7 :
0
§
>
-0k fu
2
E
2
�
�
° �
fu
0
4a
C:%
fa
0
2
a
°
0
2
p
2 w#
r
$
§
a)
m
/
©
m
°
/
/
}
§
C
§
E
2
E
2
k.
2/
°
—°
7\
N
ƒ
k
_
:
b
7
2 E
D
k�
D
/
\
§/�
�
/
J
j
V)
k�
U
§}
k
./
u
G
a
¥
k
q
910Z/9/6 33■VNI ■o gm■■VIdAi■§o) ■oS 3d

N
W
I—
Z
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
W
N
W
0
W
a
a
W•
Q
t�if
L C
E a1 -a h0
a1 t u E E o to
tsA 7 Q a1
�n en Q O Y
`� O p a' >'
v o Q U v c—
C -a O i O '� '�
co •U co t�if +' 7 N
i jE a ++ E
C a1 O .� U "a L E
co O
L O a L O O
O ao -a E a U U
• •
E
•L
E
a1
L
U
•
a)
co
+� `o —
C co
co ++
a -a c
v c
n3 C
O a1 a1
Q
-a •E
O O a'
U U W
• • •
cc E "a CL C U
' 7
U co L aE "a
N � E O .0 n3 Q n3
c > -E a) a) .� +� o c o �„ a' E co
L L {� ++ _ U U Q a1
-a a) co 7 U iri C co .� O L
�n >� Q c L a1 >, O U ++ C t o f
o v E a„ a c o� ns
n3 co co +' OU a1 O O E "a +' a1 a1 to E
C ns c c O c U c U E U O C E t]A a1
O ++ ++ 7. L Q 7 7 b�.0 O C Q- Q ++ . C C
++ C c c co + U a1 a1 > C E a1 ++++ L -a
++ C co co co E a1 ns O a1
X v 0 0 C a) "a L O t O +�
W E E L U U .E a) a) +� co +� u cn m V)
• • • • • •
L
U
a1
C
co E
U a1
c}
L 7
i "a O
co O
Q- O
a) > C
L % to
•
>
v
U
0
a)
'L
N p
C
a)
—
w +' co U C
+�+ —
V) C
L U
•i U
a)
ow`0
a ��
�2
0
f�
a1 >i
-0
Lr-
a)
vim
a O v
*' c Ansi '>
z c
co
O
ns
vns
>
a O
a
v t a)
a)
��
>
ou
0
a) c
Q'
a1 co
co v
�,���
C O
E•f6�t�
++ a)
++ a1
f6 c
O L
v
cco
o
c °=�+�
U
C
c�
L
> U ns Q
Q +L+
p +' E v Ln 3
3
Q L
E
O_
L
v_ v
D
OC
C
a)
°
O
O
�,
S o
LL I
ns Z
a1 E ``� N 'n
a1 -a C 'a
t
O U
t
E U
O
`�
L L
v
+�+ V
C
a1
L
a
�
° t
0
M o
v v cco
v
o f
°
vi
L°
o
.F
.c
,��,
z
2
to
N
a)
-0 to
to N
n3 U •L Q �O w
O 0 0 +�+
C
++ 0
vUi
CL C
>
E
EO
7
C
O
i co Q O
-a c ++
++ >
a
—�'
7
p ++
C
co >
vUi
t
a)
U
t
—
W
,�
_
Q
>
° L
>, O
E
co i E
U
'L
U—
a1
E ++
Vi
++ O
3
L
E w
E ++
+�+
.�
CL
O
H
-
p
C
t
t
++
°
v n3 g
o ns t
Q- Q
> E a
>, >i C
co
v
v
0 ns
v'
>
2 •L n
a1
-a
,� L1
L
C
L O
L a'
co N
{n L C C vi
a) O 'in
U co ++
O -a
L t a1
O �n
a) co
"a L
O U
E t
a
a)
a
_
a)
+,
3
v +�
CL CC
co a)
L �
p ++ U
+, ns ns
M 3
-0 2
O
o a)
E
p
++
ns
a)
c +� c
H
t
co
>�
co
U
'a
a)
`4 ++
C
a)
-a �` a) L
-o u "'
'"—' > t
a1 O
+' ns Q
H C
M
�••�
Q 'L
o
`�' E
++
E
E
Z
W
v
a1 E
O>
a1
a1 O
C ,
U ns E O a
"a
a) t a)
++ ++ U
a)
ns ++ ++ t ,�
U C
U
=
O
'o
++
"a
—_ L
,�
C
oA
o
t
i
O
�
Q
Ln
O
U
75-
U
L C
C a) Q co -a
a1 i C
'L a) >i a)
Ln a) O
>� L
a) Q
"a
ate)
Y O
co
to +' •�
"a
z
�n
p
.�
C �,
° O
O
++
C
+L+
Q
L1 a1
Q-
7
Q'
co
++ co
�'' (n
n3 L h0 co
'U
t]A �'' C O a) Q-
L "a
++ C E
Q ��.,
Q
>j U
a1
a1 E
n3
E
n3 a1 7 n3
-a
z
N
L
L
co 7
++
U
a1
U
7 L
-a a1
-
co
a1 a1 L
a1 a) O a1
++ ++ Q a
C L
7
•E U
7
to
7
> O
O Ln
"a
L
+� h0
C C
O
n3
> U
++
L
++ n3
a)
L L C O a
U 7 O ++
u O ++
a
a a
a) a)
a)
w
a)
a a)
C
O
>, ns c
H
L a
p
++
`�
>,
�n Ln
i a)
Q
C ++ U to co
L O
U E U C C
a1 co C
ns
p
L >
U
O
C
'n
E>
n3
—
>,
L Q- > C
d
O L
+�
a1
co
L a1
O to
+� �n
n3
U a) ,� >�
O a) p
�n
a
pp Q
L
t
Ln
N ns
p
co a) co
7
++
E
>• t n3 C
U Q O co
C �_
'E C
Q
i~
U
C
L
E a1 d
'Q
N
f6
ns
v°1i
=
a)
c -0
o a
E '� � � v
+' � ou � v u
c `° E
O
c � °)
c
o
7 C
�
c
to C
�
coo
Q
W
L
U ++
O >,
U
a
co C
a1 C
to iri to ._ ++ U
L 7
,c Q
O L
L
ns C C
a' a)
Q
a)
Q
a1
C
co
C
—
n3
>--0
o
co
'T) E +� E"
�„� ++
+= a U E
o
c
*' i
E
L E
p
C E°
c
a t 0
ns
� O U c
0
v U c v _
c
O
n
>
'+�
++
> ao v
.f6
E
ao
+' C
+' co
-P
a)
C
co O C
W
+,
o
U+
n
-ala
a1 �
L1
U 7� $
S a a +�+ O_
"a c O
N U t
c
a
0
a1 a N O
Z
t
a) co
t
a)
ao "a
a,
Q co —
.E
a) ns 41 a)
a) U
cot co
+�
+�
o
,a
m
U
E
W
ao
n
+ ao
v
v
n
-0 u
> c
E
ns .0
+, cot
E E
v ns
E 3 E
.E
E
0
°
.S � to
H cn cn +�
H � w
a)
a)
a
v
ns
ns
ns v a
J
a_
LL
0-
O N
Lu
a
+L+
7
W
t
(n
z
h0
� �
J �

910Z/9/6 33NVNIa80 ONINNVId A1NA03 NOS83d
N
D
N
JN
a
a
W•
4--
0
I m L 0 u f0 to 0 f6 Q •^
LL
d f6 ,� f0 U f0 Vi .V O
L {n L L N Q- M O
++ p U f0 a f6 w U ++ Q •� U
V) t 0 i C7 f0 > C O L O N N N
-0 b.0 LL U N LL — 0 '++ N -0 U ++ L
O ++ V) h0 C N O C h.0 "a N t �n 0 �p
Fa E 0� u ul v u u— E � a) a co +� �� ao
O O O ++ f0 Q >i f0 O 41 N>
C L > L L L 7 O N Qi (�O Q O 0
Q a a a a a .� U Q_ 7 S {n
• • • • • •
U
C
f0
+,
•V
++
Ln
C p -Cb
O
Vn
h0
W
C
L
t]A
t
Q
+L+
w -0
N
f0 +� ++
U {n
C
N
V)
++
C
to
L U
C
++
•L U
c0
N
>
N
O X
"a
>. C
N N
++ O
f0 U
{n ++
Q
a
L V
++
O i1
O �n
f0
Q) •U
—
Q N O
i1 N
E a..1 >
Q
N C
"� C�
�
"a
vii
v
U
Q
C
7
7 .+' >,
(o
C C_
C
++
N
N
p
C_
N
to
O C �
L
f0
U
>i
7 •�
C C
m
a f6
L
L
E
L L to
L
O N
.L "a
L f6 f0
m
6 N
"a Ln
iH L
0
O
U
i
t
U
7
O
L
Q 7 N
U
O
r
Cc .7 Q
Ql
++ >�
"a
N
72
N
N t10
U N f0
O
U
�,
`
L
0
+,
0
"a
-a co
N
C v
-0 M �
io O
+'
O
O
`�
+�•'
4--N
+�+
U
\
C f0
OU
.L
—
C C ,U
+' "a
C N >
N
�'
M
C
+,
C
+�+
O N
Q 7 to
C C
N
m
0 Ln
'—
N
+'
C U
+'
�n
L
++
C
O N O
'++
L
N
�n
N
f0 �
O
N
L
Q
L ++
O
++
N O L
'a
L\
�n "a
,� �n
w D
(O
L
N Q-
N
t
O
C
,>
L
>� O
f0 t
U
L
U
—>
O
-0
t]A
C
-0 ++ ++
>, f0 to
7 C
L .� _
f0 N J
f0 >�
L N =
Ln N
+'
LO
U
'tj
L
�
C
m
+�+
7 N
O
N
U
-0
i
>�
N
+�+ 0 U
O
N
N Q'
N
E
L >�
7
N
t
f0 Q
++
.� +�+
N
= Ln
�
O
w
Ln
>i
t
O
O"
N
O
=
X
Y
O Q
�p
N O c
>
L
N N
++
�n h0
A
N+ L
n 0
C
O
m
a~
L
a 'L
O n
+'
h0
i
L
N O -0
._
.�_
L
7 U
++
(O
++
t
u
o
++ _
OL
>, p
(6
N
N
O
�n
•Q
7
(O
O
N
f6
•�
N i
-a N
p
i
5- N
N
m 0
N-
0—
+�+
O h�0
`~
= f0
7 m
U
O
U (6 ++
(�6 N
Q
�,,
C
E
Q +�+
N
Q�
U
(O N E
N
V "a
f0
Z
O N�
3
M
>� )
O
t
7-
(O
L
•� U
�n
N >. O
0
u
U
C>
�,
p
C O
+� L
c
6
v
0
C
•�.V
N L Q
O E_ L
C N C
•�
U
C
O
N
U
W
L
p ++
O
+�+
d
O i
C>
M
0
O
++ U
u
a •C
L
—
N
N
"a
{n
d "O d
.� CL
CL
i ~
u t
fL0
X
N
V
+�+ Q N
++
Q
{n
++ 7
{n
�n m
N N
+�+
f0
'tj
N
L
O
C
++
N
Q
L
m O C
U
.c
L
O
U CL
i
E
C
+'
++
(O ++
L C ++
>
Q O
C >i
Q)i Q .�
W
Q t
-0
+, +�+
•�
O to �+
L— H
O
•�
L
(6
N
6 N
N
O C
p O
= > f6
D
"a
�n ++
N
U O
•L
7 +L+
+
L Q ++
>,
w
U
{n
O�
+Q'
>,
L
r ++
C
�.O
.++ _
— _
-m
J
a
i ?�.
++
m
++
��,
"a
Q
U = C
vMo'
C
C
moo"
C
�n m
L
O
�
0
>>
++
L
C
7
U
U
0
{n
��
,��
L L
41
L U :�
L
{n
:�
v��
L
L
C
.�
.�
U
>
L
O
U
•L
U.
W
>
vii +Q+
U
M
N ,L C
�n
f6 M
Q
Q
U C
p
Q
"a
C
L
O
U
N
i
C
-a Q
•+'
U
-0
++
Q" N
z
W
(O
N
41 U
Q
N 6 N
Q
N
N N `�
Q
N
`�
U
(�6 t
u
+�+
. E +�+
O +�+
M
M
w
C f0
—
O
f6 C
CL
Q to �'
2
{n C 0
7 _
L
O
t
.—
t
L �.+
L C L
Q Q f0
i Q 0
to "a
to
t
0
"a
(O
w
?�.
41
E N
Er
Q N N
a_
LL
N
0 N
a a W
T a
N 3
Z D
= C
=

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
L >` 0 L
O0 O O L U O_ a) D a) C O
a)W ro a) Ta a) ra a) O
L C p 0> N C O C O C -C
+-
C
qA
+- p • -
° �°- vi vOi N a U OU U N oA u ro > w C C O
r6 w a - L a) - Ln. U p a a) -0
L _ a tCL
_ Ufa
CL 0
NU U (6 a-+ ate+ > (6 (6 C o fa fa o tn fa O U� a Co
U a) a) t C Cfa a) o L w C w Lii C (6
L a) U C •C P p a a� 0 a 0 x `� O a) .0 (6 L O
> L C O
O O -0 O- .- U O C a-' L 7 0 C C
a) L U a) +j a) O a) 0 t - O (6 O
O L a) ++ C p C C ° N m a) U 0 CL a) O U a
C L L C �..i 4..i i6 D V) E C a E
O Q m N Q ° (6 c0 O a+ L C O
L t a� > C —
CL 0 fa
D L w U w U rah � o hA qA +� o a� o m a� O a>
O C C VI C C � (6 (6 U
rrYCL
N
U L U U N 4•.i •� L � O •� i6 L i6
CL Q C a) O O O t � O a L O 'Q C C
CL rL6 0 in 2 O C N O m N +' -0 Q a) Q O a O
fa 4-L fu '— O > L M W q1D ate' C t O 4 m -j
C: .a O CL C: ° c +- o 4- -0 � a`� � D �W
U O V M L O C a) C Q C — ° = O 0 i�
3 0 '� � a� — o 5 fa c E E= a N > °' ani m°
U Q a C C w C -0 E m fu N +� O +, ° L U ilio
p C t L -r-m"00 O C M
M w fa ° > a) _ L +' Q O VI O ++ w a _ U m .0 C
{A •a 'C C � a) C `� � O O O � (6 a) p L CL fa•a C W
N W O hA - in a U VI U W ro
C: o ami U c 3 C:� a a� _ U c a 4-
+, U 4- O Y p ° ro a, ro M +- +- +' L U
Q VI C L O ° (6 a ate+ ~ C C -r O in L 7 in V O W
CO p a -0 � , � E O L +o � -0 p *' 00 a-+ < O C a
a) O +, Q • oA oA ,0
i L a-•' (�6 O (6 C p a s (�6 t .� C (6 Q U L'
U O L a) O L- S U +- U C .2 c C t t 4 -
Co N
3 +1 a cU p 4- a '� 'c a a) c a � (D +� +� D
0 L- M 4- 4- 4-" a O fa ON -0 N m `� m a fa N b.0 O 0" 0 4-
rl
w
�
U
'a
-
t
U
•U Q
C
m
h0
c0
m
Q
>•
�n "a a1
�'
a1
O U
O
a1 a1
U
LnC
U a)
OL
+U,
a) U
U
++
C
�n O
c
U_
cL E
f0
E
•L
-
t
`
b.0
•mr LE
V
i
Q
O N
m
C
L C
`
a1 00
>.
7
•�
L\
C LC
N
L
O
-a
h0
o
a)
-,f
`oa
:3 CO
v
aEi
EZ'E
N
°•�
C
oX
r
++
asi
L
•�
E
c�0
+�' •�
v
o
�
v U
L
a,
L
LE.�
a]
Oi
a1 i
�'
U
c
++
Q r
++
C°
co N ns
O
O
,O
a .�
CL
a
Q
Q
"a�O c
W
- O
Q
c
of°
U
c°
O
�° Ln
C
f0 O L C
+�+
i
i
+, f0
C
= N
U
U 4- a1
0
a1 Q a1 O
•�
O
� .L
E
a1 v "a
c
u
m": v
U
U
-
E o
O_
v
m
m
o m N a
co
�
s�
m c
Q Q" =
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
L >` 0 L
O0 O O L U O_ a) D a) C O
a)W ro a) Ta a) ra a) O
L C p 0> N C O C O C -C
+-
C
qA
+- p • -
° �°- vi vOi N a U OU U N oA u ro > w C C O
r6 w a - L a) - Ln. U p a a) -0
L _ a tCL
_ Ufa
CL 0
NU U (6 a-+ ate+ > (6 (6 C o fa fa o tn fa O U� a Co
U a) a) t C Cfa a) o L w C w Lii C (6
L a) U C •C P p a a� 0 a 0 x `� O a) .0 (6 L O
> L C O
O O -0 O- .- U O C a-' L 7 0 C C
a) L U a) +j a) O a) 0 t - O (6 O
O L a) ++ C p C C ° N m a) U 0 CL a) O U a
C L L C �..i 4..i i6 D V) E C a E
O Q m N Q ° (6 c0 O a+ L C O
L t a� > C —
CL 0 fa
D L w U w U rah � o hA qA +� o a� o m a� O a>
O C C VI C C � (6 (6 U
rrYCL
N
U L U U N 4•.i •� L � O •� i6 L i6
CL Q C a) O O O t � O a L O 'Q C C
CL rL6 0 in 2 O C N O m N +' -0 Q a) Q O a O
fa 4-L fu '— O > L M W q1D ate' C t O 4 m -j
C: .a O CL C: ° c +- o 4- -0 � a`� � D �W
U O V M L O C a) C Q C — ° = O 0 i�
3 0 '� � a� — o 5 fa c E E= a N > °' ani m°
U Q a C C w C -0 E m fu N +� O +, ° L U ilio
p C t L -r-m"00 O C M
M w fa ° > a) _ L +' Q O VI O ++ w a _ U m .0 C
{A •a 'C C � a) C `� � O O O � (6 a) p L CL fa•a C W
N W O hA - in a U VI U W ro
C: o ami U c 3 C:� a a� _ U c a 4-
+, U 4- O Y p ° ro a, ro M +- +- +' L U
Q VI C L O ° (6 a ate+ ~ C C -r O in L 7 in V O W
CO p a -0 � , � E O L +o � -0 p *' 00 a-+ < O C a
a) O +, Q • oA oA ,0
i L a-•' (�6 O (6 C p a s (�6 t .� C (6 Q U L'
U O L a) O L- S U +- U C .2 c C t t 4 -
Co N
3 +1 a cU p 4- a '� 'c a a) c a � (D +� +� D
0 L- M 4- 4- 4-" a O fa ON -0 N m `� m a fa N b.0 O 0" 0 4-
rl
w

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
C
N
E
I. -
fa
Q
N
Q
C
O
U
a)
Q
0
C
C
D
O
U
C
O
a�
a
O4.1
1
a�
C
cc
0
5
O
41
O
(6
Q
•!R
U
C
E
U
O
O
r6
(6
O
E
N
E
C
++
O
p
_
p
L
L
E
0
N
L
_
fa
p
N
dA
aa-
i
(6
+a
O
N
p
p
-
C
t
L
N
O
O
Q
to
t
+�
a-+
N
(6
p
OC
In
+�
Z
'.
N
p
N
O
Q
m
+'
N
N
+�
N
O
4-
U
>
�
U
OO
In
fa
t
C
L
mp
U X
U
VI
O
N
a
E
4
fu
C
CL
L
(6
O
N
�
*'
fu
C
�
N
L
+�
•X
�
N to
4a
N
•D
D
U
Q
—
Q
C
(6
D
U
X
N
0
D
�
Op
= L
=
m
Q
—
N
f
++
U4a C:
VI
VI
N
(6 ++
(6
(6
N
—
C
O
C
p
(6
�"
vI Q
vI
O
C
N
t
N
C>4aN
N
N dA
N
0
N
E
to
(6
N
E
to
C
C
m
m
C
a
0 C
0
L
O
In
(6
N
N
oC
(6
O
t
O
o
�
p
�
t
(6
C
� O
�
(6
N
L
N
,O
+'
E
N
L
�
41
to
(6
+�
�
1
41
C
�
O
Ln N
Ln
to
+�
t
OA
L
O
to
Q
+,
t
W
C
U
+-
N
vI
N
a
t N
•v
L
O
4-
O
C
_
E
L
V
41
C
p
to
.�
+�
+,
C
U
L
(6
O
U
1
m
Z
>
to
N
OL
+'
U
7
7
Q
L
C
L
O
N
w
a+
In
C
C
L
O
O
C
Q
'�
7
O
O
(6
�
�
N
O
C
L
U
•�
N
E
C
dA
O
Z
41 C
�'
'C
N
o
i
N
V
N
pp
L
L
N
L
(6
O
C
r -I
c -I
`�
O
o
w
N
E
0
+�
..
X
•�
41
VI
C
O
C
O
�
�
VI �
VI
O
o0
E
D
.�
Q
O
z
+�
+,
N
x
p
O
N
+,
C m
C
N
O
N
t
C
Q
E
t
N
In
N
t
-0
V
+�
O
t
�
—
u
C
m
N
p
o
12
41
_0
O
-0 O
�
oUC
C
m-0
_
-
—
0
U
fa
4-+'
CL
-0
L
7
C
>�
(C6
_
C -r
C
C
4-
�
C
N
Q
Q
cw
ro
N
C
m
C
N
>
N
C
M
N
O L
U p
O
U
�
m
N
U
In
O
C
N
•p
L
X
N
C
*'
U
(6
C
�
(6
>
C
(6
E
+�
N
V
U
L
In
Q
C
O
U
N
OA
E�
+�
V1
—
N
.�
Q
L
(6
—
+�
C
O
VI
X
Qj
W
vi
N I�
+�
N
(6
(6
7
cr
E
qA
C
O
-
O
N
N
iE
dA
C
C
C
+,
41
r6
—
N-0
C
p
io
z
E_0
E
+�
•�
_
C
0
O
O
O
,L
O>
�O
L
p=
U
_
Ln
Ln
0O
+'
N
C
O
N
N
O
N
Q
CL
C
N �
E_
N
E
U
D
D
m
Q
0
-�
Q
dA
-
'L
0
U
L
N
E
L
0
U_0
O
O
(6
t
�'
41
U
L
W
N Ln
C
-E
C
a•+
C
C
N
L
m
4
i
p
(6
L
L Qi
(6
L
m
O
m
Q
to
(6
L-
4-
1
m
OC
C
U
O
VI
•L
O
^�
•C
C
•tn
Q_C
fa
-C
"
�
t
(6
•L
+L,,
u
Q
0
C
L
N
N
L
O
to
U
N
V)
C
X
N
�
N
C
N
L
41
�
C
>
O
V
N
-0
U
L
L—
++
N
VI
N
(6
ate-+
N
U
O
O
E
U
a
C
Q
C
O
41
O
N
O
U C
O
U
U
.�
V
LL
D
f6
L
E
•E
�
U
U
+D+
U
(6
N
U
L
_
C
0
O
C
L
dA
U
L
7
7
w
Q
r6
dA
E
t
C
Z
(6
L
U
.0
+�
O
7
N
a�
•Q
O
m
-
Q
O
C
O
C
M
E
0
w
p
CL
_0N
(�6 >
O
(�6
4-
N
U
+-
N
2��
41
X
L
L
O
C
fa
t
N
E
E
p-0
X
�
41
U
p
o
1
m
i6
Y
O
L
i6
m
U
0
M
p -a
N
Q
V)
C
N
Q=
N
N
N
1
cn
In dA
(6
In
In
a
m
O
W
Z N
ro
OU
Ln
a)C
—0
0
m
>
Q
Q
�
N
.�
OC
ro 2
'�
r6
OC
—
L
VI
O
a°'i E
c�
o
in
v a�
u
a�
a
z
`^ Q
Q
U
N
m
Q
3
Q
41
o
o
U
D
C
N
E
I. -
fa
Q
N
Q
C
O
U
a)
Q
0
C
C
D
O
U
C
O
a�
a

910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
� oA
T c
Y c ro 41
3 N a O t
E a *' ° L L C
°' r� c ° +' E " ° o -,
E a� U 4-j o w
O o 3 a �, L- o O Q �_ f
0 4- °
ru v L c a 0 C:�° N a� p c
in -a Q ra D w o
L
o,o m a
t a� t � 4- a c O w O � �_ m 0 O
hA E C M C U L z L X
O_ t a) m O a) Q O ro a) m 0 Q —
CJ C t LCL 4-j (6 CL (6 Ln Z CLU 0 w 7 +� ++
VI O E a•+ 72!-O U N dA d Q W o +� L - L
4 C:i mt L 7 U +' Q a) Q
° v a °Q w.EL c- a ct
c t � t ° ° a�
L a w O a) in 4a (6 L r I U U t 7 L 0
D 0 t Q a) X 0 t N W a t dA 7 (6
cr O a) L C Q +' 0 C
Ca•+ L O Q C U > O 1 C:C:a) C:
VI L iso D Q V) •m Ln
E c: CL CL� 0 L dA VLn
N O Q a) t o O U O O Q (6 � L 0 L D m C>
O L d > w ate"' .Q w E a) +, UO +�' a) m a) Q C a) a)
2 (L6 m w 7 C a) a) O a) O L cn + E E (6 Q OC
O t N L O 5 U +� +� Q fa - +� N W C C O VI `� � +�
c +� p o— >L CL O a� _ w_j ro a� t c c ° '- 0 c
° oC C4- E c .� +� 0 o0A aci U L E w O U (D O a�
U ++ a) O L t Q Q a) L 4- W O • L m C
Y 0
is i o > in C C C a•+ a-+ OC C ° a•+ L L a) >
° w C Q CO la)/I O a) O Q (6 (C6 a) a) wa O ° ° = O t
m p E O C L O U L 7o 4-j +� O D CfLL- a) fa C O a� +-
0° W +� +� ° a) o a) C +' U a)
OMEP U O m .o n" > L o
CL ra a) ro ro _ in ro
C N L N 0 Q o L N W 0 L O qA +�'., 0 J f, a) Y +' •C •a) 0 C a)
U °' i LL c w o m ° m o°c ° z~ aXi o Q _� a� : w t
0- w O Q L w Q w a) N Q W = L N 0 w a) C +�
nz ° a>i z Q t Q a 0 a O 4 ri rq m •� o,0 0 E° 0
U Q `� —0 � in o— a) C C t fa L
00 a O O a) C a- +' C 0 E O +'
0 4- LUQ •� 0
U O D z Q +�+ Q m m m Q_0 Q 0

J
W
O
O
a
Q
Ln
W
H
O
z
6
C
O
Ln
O
Q
(1)
U
C
fa
C
0
27,
N
N
Q
V
Vf
W
O
2
0
W
w
D
V
LLQ
D
z
CQ
C
W
F-
0 O
z
910Z/9/6 33NVNIaaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
E
a
000
C:
L
L
O
Q
S
O
Q
C
a)
E
0
a,
C:
O
N
+-
6L
a)
w+,
fu
L
N
m
O
E
D
ro
U
U
m
a)
41
Z
a)
ro
Z
E
+�
c
O
fa
o
>
a
0
a)
0
+'
E
V
C
r�
(6
U
41
a..�
>
C
(6
L
U
QJ
L
•O
t
O
U
7
�.
.0
(6
>,
C:M
(6
m
vI
X
pCL
N-0
C
p
C
C
C
fu
C
_0
O
D
Z
O
E
oC
U
�'
L
E
,�
0
,�
t
o
0
4-
C
'L
r-
C
r6
O
t
(6
C
+�
a_,,
Y
V
O
L
O
E
t
L
OU
m
(n
O
U
O
a
Z
+�
C
41
�'
L
++
°
C
C
U
`�
O
>
m
0
O
Q
O
a
oc
3
O
r�
�,
+�
t
a
�,
C
m
y
o
.2
'c
O
E
O
�
41
D
>
D
=
O
O
E
C
C
t0
fa
L
p[
N
Q
(6
L
ate-+
E
c
dA
-
(a
t=
Z
C
a)
_
(6
O
L
�
O
t
C
C:
N
L
(6
dA
a-+
ate+
o
O
hA
v
J
+'
O
oc
C
O
c
+�
C
a)
.a
C—
U
J
"
U
O
.�
+�
(6
O
41
O
Q
C
p
W
w
C
C
ro
C
Q
a)
+�
C
O
-0
cUi
p
,�
0
41
0
Q
'L
VQj
•0
41
a)
>
a)
a)
te+
U
a)
M
Q
a)
Q
L
(6
VQI
p5
p
aAl
(6
>
C
N
oNc
C
L
0
a
OC
(6
Q
o
o
—
o0
t+-
1
C
++
p
a)
Q
E
4-_
4
L
-C
+�a+
a)
v
OU
C:
ro
O
o
=o
D
U
C
d
OCa
_0
M
•
�
E
L
O
-0
U
O
t
O
2
C
4 -
�
�D
CL
(6
L
C
o
p
Q
Q
O
C
E
a)
a)
N
v
W
a)
O
L
fa
-0
t
O
o
p
U
0
CL
aw)
or-
a)
w
�
o
4-
,
m
a)
_
D
a)
a)
w
CL
-
Ln
Q
w
Q"
+�
0
O
(n
Ln
O
a)
CL
U
U
a)
U
a)
m
a)
U
E
C
C
w
CD
N
E
=
C
x
C
o
E
cu:
-o
a)
+,
=
C
a)
o
O
>—
C
m
O
O
a)
M.
—
O
m
L
a)
C
C
m
0�
a)
�
•T
�
F
2
ro
a)
Q
-C
U
4-
-0
o
L
(6
E
L
CD
0
-0
�,,,
vI
a)
L
a)
C
a)
0
,Wy
/
-
C
C
L
L
L
V)
Q
CL C
m
U
Q
D
z
a)
O
—
0
+1+
+1+
41
VI
O
(6
CO
4-
O
4-+
N
++
'D
O
O
J
`�
(6
m
ro
ro
p
a
+1
a)
41
in
C
j
O
C
41
`�
ro
a)D
>
*'
C
E�
4w
Q
E
a
�
O
u
-
a)
t
C
N
X
+�
O
C
i
a)
O
C
`•�
C
Q
O
O
a)
NCL
,C
i
Q
t
,c
O
E
4-
m
o
Lnz
0
D
Q
ate+
u
a)
Ca
Z
O
+
-_
U
OU
in
L
a)
a)
0
U
a)
Q
U
Q
L
(6
C
W
z
L<
+�
U
C
a)
U
QN
+-
(6
fu
fa
N
m
nn
�o
0
fa
a)
a
W
m
z
O
E
0
~
OC
O
U
U
O
U
t
Q
O
a
a
Q
Q
n-0
Q
z
E

4
O
t
C
N
C
m
N
Q
N
t
O
C
O
U
L
C
O
U
0
N
D
C
N
fu
E
Q
D
El
N
4.-
4-
L
O
N
N
(6
�
w
w
ro
EO
-0"
4-
4-
E
dA
a+
L
N
0
0
C:
O
X
4-
C
N
�
D
N
E
O
O
O
0
+-
C
E
•�
C
C
0
D
a•+
4..i
z
N
o
Ln
L
N
EE
O
"
(6
t
O
(6
>.
O
>,
4a
}i
Q
C:
4a
('n
7
L
E
O
O
t
U
>
-0
Q
O
N
E
E
N
N
O
N
m
=
(6
0
N
L
O
0
>j
C
L
O
>
t
(6
U
N
E
+'
_4-0
w
O
N
C
C
+-
4
(6
C
N(6
.�
•L
VI
O
j
0
C:>
u
Q
,�_
X
O
`�
O
N
C
0
E
40+
M
L
a)
4-
Ln
.0
-
N
L
E
.0-
N
C
C
L
N
L
D
CL
O
N
N
Q
L
X
O
•7
N
C
L
4a
4aQ
j
a-+
,O
0
te+
(6
4-
O
+''
m
�
(6
4a
U
4
}
a-+
Q
(6
0
t
4'
a-+
4-
•O
4'
(6
O
C
C
a-
U
>
(tea
C
_
O
Q
C
NN
E
++
O
C
E
-0
Q
C
(6
=
E
_
'L
m
�
L
4-
0
O
L
4-
O
N
+'
X
O
L
t
O
O
Q
O
N
U
Q
C
7
(6
+�
E
-o
t
+�
in
N
O
w
+'
Q
7
C
O
O
C
>�
(6
O
(C6
U
U
O
t
.0
L
(6
L
N
O
L
++
O
U
Q
Q
Q
N
0
a-+
+''
+''
qA
C
C
0
—4-jE
m
C
O
t
L
L
U
-0
O
U
N
Q
N
Q
t
VI
N
Q
L
a,•1
>
CCL
N
++
D
N
N
N
C
�
>
m
U
4-
ate-
O
D
m
ate-+
O
L
0
0—
0
0
Ln
D
—
C
—
'L
4-
,-
C
N
0
—OA
r6
O
ro
N
4-0W
+�
EL
-0
L
w
Q
E
O
Q
C
Q
N
E
+1(�0
Q
0
a
tD
O
4-
M
UU
M
U
m
0-
w
U
C
fu
D
0
C
O
4.1C
E
m
Q
N
R
910Z/9/6 33NVN1aaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
_Q
U
C
Q
N
4-
(6
0
(6
t
t
U
iE
4.10
(6
D
fa
C
N
t
O
O
O
O
(6
O
C
N
t
a-+
D
07
N
E
Q
w
C
O
N
(6
N -r-
C
4- O
D O
E
7
N
L C
O N
CL
E
a0+ (6
E
E
N Q
C
E
O
N
C
i_
7 �
O O
N C
O
D
L �
io
O o
Q C
N O
4.1
N C
�-+ O
D
O L
4-i
fu C
O OU
}i W
N �
� •C
N j
� N
C
O O
Q
D
C Q
U D
}i
(L6 �
L
E U
c
N >
>
E
0�
D C
O
Q
(6
4.- N
O u
L
� L
m Q
N E
U
4-
O
Q
C
7
4.1
(6
C
N
}i
C
w
C
m
E
Q
N
O N
t C
O
4.1C
C
m O
E
N N
Q
N >,
ate+ C
O O
C
O
u 4-jU C:
L (6
� U
C Q
O Q
L-
0 O L
N N
C O
O —
C N
O E
O
� L
EL L O
Q O O
w4-j
U
>
O a
Q Q
Q �
Q Q
r -I N
4-
N
N
—
�
�
+�
ro
EO
0
E
dA
a+
L
Q
C
_
O
O
O
C
E
L
N
U
C:
a•+
Ln
N
o
Ln
O
"
EN
U
w
4a
7
4-O
C
U
L
fu
D
in
-0
Q
O
N
(f6
=
(6
o
,
>j
C
OQ
>
O
4-
N
E
+'
�
C.0
U
C
O
o
C
(6
4-
4-j.2
j
L
U
u
Q
,�_
O
`�
O
N
•L
U
Q
>
C
4-
Ln
N
m
VI
C
C
L
N
L
O
N
Q
O
E
N
C
L
N
j
a-+
,O
0
te+
(6
4-
O
+''
m
�
w
4a
U
4
Ln
'c
.�
D
U
O
C
C
C
U
E
(L6
(6
_
O
Q
C
E
cn
EQ
N
U
L
'C:
4-
0
a-+
O
L
`e
C:
O>
.
(6
0
N
U
a-+
U
>.
t
C
?�
E
C
(6
+'
O
U
'L
ate'
N
N
+aE
0
L
a
O
O
t
.0
L
(6
L
N
O
L
++
Ln
>
Q
Q
Q
R
910Z/9/6 33NVN1aaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d
_Q
U
C
Q
N
4-
(6
0
(6
t
t
U
iE
4.10
(6
D
fa
C
N
t
O
O
O
O
(6
O
C
N
t
a-+
D
07
N
E
Q
w
C
O
N
(6
N -r-
C
4- O
D O
E
7
N
L C
O N
CL
E
a0+ (6
E
E
N Q
C
E
O
N
C
i_
7 �
O O
N C
O
D
L �
io
O o
Q C
N O
4.1
N C
�-+ O
D
O L
4-i
fu C
O OU
}i W
N �
� •C
N j
� N
C
O O
Q
D
C Q
U D
}i
(L6 �
L
E U
c
N >
>
E
0�
D C
O
Q
(6
4.- N
O u
L
� L
m Q
N E
U
4-
O
Q
C
7
4.1
(6
C
N
}i
C
w
C
m
E
Q
N
O N
t C
O
4.1C
C
m O
E
N N
Q
N >,
ate+ C
O O
C
O
u 4-jU C:
L (6
� U
C Q
O Q
L-
0 O L
N N
C O
O —
C N
O E
O
� L
EL L O
Q O O
w4-j
U
>
O a
Q Q
Q �
Q Q
r -I N

a�
L
D
cr
L
E
L
Q
O
N
O
z
m
i
V
l0
N
qA
(6
Q
Ln
N
ro
H
C
N
E
a�
D
cr
N
Of
Q C
O O
X L
N N
d
L
O O
41
L >-
0 +
C
C >
O
41 W
� �
E C
+� Q
t Q
to LL
NC
-rC:
O +,
C �
CL
L �
t �
H Q
910Z/9/6 33NVN1aaO ONINNVId A1NnO3 NOS83d

O �_ �, co o
O O O is O v •� O s, c�� w
UO
O Z O dq Z w O O O C,4
j
Ln CJ rj)
ry O O ca O C°J O `� O E O O a, O Ocj
OYw
cj
O o Cio o m
3 N
�G�..y�y � � a" a� '� �_ o `n v � •� � '� E� � is `� � °� �
ci
Cn
ca p r
4 -JV -Zz s0, o M m
4i zi V CJ s ca V) 2 GJ O O O V sfCy O O CJ V) 7z LL 1-,Z
t OD
V w W C� GJ CJ Vf ..■ Gi �l, O bA C� 'O 'O •��, .� O
4.1
ii•�rl CJ O N S, w S: '� c> GJ 'S, O
W -AV cOa w' o a O W o c E
V � ° z z� 2 met X00 a) 41 �o °�°-°
rj r.1�L� of o o°
-o ca a dIj0 V)cn F u o
° 0 M. ° cj v�F
° Q
cj oo ca °Ln cj � w
a4 A cn cn 14 14
o O ca ° m
Z Z 5 sem.o O °�
oc ° o Q ° o o A.A. 3 O o -o Q. � = ��cm
a o
E-� n �, ca ca Q U w Qr �l .. .. .. Z W � �, ci p O Z w
0

U
N
��O
�
i-.
.y U
•�
w t-. w r-+
O O
�U ci
O
a
O
�.,
W w y
O
c�
O
O
v)
O
O
V
O
p
O
Lr
O
al
6O
•
M
O
00
00
ri
Ln
(A
N
iN/)•
�'
o
6i
a
o
iA
o
> o
+jo
�,�
o
°
o
u
o
a
o
O
O
O O
O)
O
O
O
C
p
�
C
V)^O
O w 'z
O
N
O
E =
O
M
v O .0 M
•'O
s,
r -I
N
�
O
�
G'
V)
Q
M v) •O
V
C)
v)
'O
C) a
GJ (1)O
s0, O
c� O_
-C
O
to
c�
4�^O
w
to
OM
w
O
11)
to O
-zi
N
r -I
I,
r -I
O
O
to s0
•O
c�
0
F �
H
b�q � O c� �
�
o r '„
�+ O,
•� W
W
a O V
N
}
bon •W
p p
ar
N
W
•O Ln V
w
F
�
F
LU
+J
-
O
w
W
00
O
Lj
v
o
O V w
V
3
°
4.
a •O O
U
LJ
Q. � O w O
�
0.
O
M. O
O
c�
z
4-j
U O
O
�
O GJ �
V) LI)
Z � �
� .�
�
�
� v 'v �
a
¢• � eon � �,
A
d o
75 o
y
>
a
U
o
°�
°
z
Ca
o
.
75 75o
o
a O 0
O ern
c
G
G •�
� �
v
� �
F p- a. �
o
,�
u
o o
.>,;
t
7o 7�
U O
F+
�+
X A
o
w>
a U w
O a
0 2 3 a
z°
��O
�
v)
�^�
�U ci
O
OO
�.,
O
O
c�
O
O
v)
O
O
O
O
p
O
Lr
O
al
6O
•
M
O
00
00
ri
Ln
(A
N
iN/)•
�'
N
6i
i/)•
iA
wO 4'
O v)
O
O
O O
O)
O
O
O
C
p
�
w
V)^O
O w 'z
O
N
O
E =
O
M
v O .0 M
s,
r -I
r -I
00
V)
Q
M v) •O
V
C)
v)
'O
C) a
GJ (1)O
s0, O
c� O_
-C
O
to
c�
4�^O
w
to
OM
w
O
11)
to O
-zi
N
r -I
I,
r -I
O
O
to s0
•O
c�
F �
H
b�q � O c� �
�
p
�+ O,
•� W
W
a O V
N
}
bon •W
p p
ar
N
W
•O Ln V
w
F
�
F
LU
+J
-
O
w
W
00
41
U
Lj
v
o
O V w
V
3
°
4.
a •O O
U
LJ
Q. � O w O
�
0.
O
M. O
O
c�
z
4-j
U O
O
z
O GJ �
V) LI)
o
�,
z°
O
O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
Lr
O
al
6O
•
M
O
00
00
ri
Ln
(A
N
iN/)•
�'
N
6i
i/)•
iA
O
O
O
O
C
p
�
w
N
00
M
O
00
r -I
r -I
Q
OM
O
11)
00
-zi
N
r -I
I,
r -I
c�
H
4�
U
4�
U
4J
N
N
}
N
w
ar
N
LU
LU
+J
-
U
N
W
41
U
Lj
U
3
LJ
0
O
O
z°

O
F
U
a�
U
U
0
o �
O �
� � O
o � �
o � o
t\
O
z mu mu m
co C N
U7�,
�o W CA
°
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
s O
M
M
LL
M
r
aw
c-1
N
Q.
z
r.
U O
.O
Q.)
C ^�
o
C �
U U O
W
�y
O
• O
o
O
O
O
�
OBJ U
Lt0
00
O
bn O
•s, � O
� "O cn
�
O
� •O
O � •V
�?
V O �
cj
O
q-) 4
o o�
o
O
w �
V
w
O
O
Ln
O N
4,1O
O n
61
s
Q.
U
O
r0 N
^p
Ln
^� �--�
U
Z
• Vi
O
4-j
o �
.4
C�
U
U
cu
cu
`:
bn
Hcu
�
p
LU
rz Q)
O
LU
U
U
LJ
-
cU
U
W
a)
L
O
J
+°
`p
..
U
O O
O
O V
O 'O
to
'p
O y., O
�
• � O �
Q.
� ' �
to
sem, •� �
�
cj V ,m
$
E-
y
O bq
�l
bp
z
O
� �
F 4� 4�
UO
O
V V
�
O
F N
z w
Ln
O
�_
�' t
o
w
�"' � O" •GJ
�
�' p
O
�
y
O
a ° w
°
.°42
a
o
'4-� E-
•U
•r--+
•U
Qy GJ
GJ
•GJ
Lz7 � O p
O
�%+ p �
GJ
�
W
Q"
a�
U
U
0
o �
O �
� � O
o � �
o � o
t\
O
z mu mu m
co C N
U7�,
�o W CA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
s O
M
M
Ln
61
M
O
c-1
N
V
U O
.O
Q.)
C ^�
o
C �
U U O
W
�y
O
• O
o
O
O
O
�
OBJ U
Lt0
00
O
O
O
U O
C
�?
0�
O
q-) 4
o o�
� O �
V
O
Lr)(71
O
Ln
y
4.
61
Oz
4-j
Q.
U
O
Q.
c cn
O
U
N
U
Z
O
4-j
o �
.4
C�
U
U
cu
cu
`:
++
Hcu
�
LU
LU
rz Q)
O
LU
U
U
LJ
-
cU
U
W
a)
L
O
°
+°
`p
a�
U
U
0
o �
O �
� � O
o � �
o � o
t\
O
z mu mu m
co C N
U7�,
�o W CA
c
O
O
O
O
U O
Q.)
C ^�
o
C �
U U O
OBJ U
y
O
O
U O
C
�?
0�
q-) 4
o o�
� O �
O 0�
�
4�
-rZ
4.
Oz
4-j
Q.
U
O
Q.
c cn
OOJ cn
5 7z
U
Z
O
4-j
o �
.4
O
'1
O
° rS
W
O
d
41 �-
�
rz Q)
O
.ISI Qi .L
Z 4.
O
4.
O
..

APPENDIX F
SELECTION CRITERIA MATRIX

�
0
u
e
e
rj�
o@
@
»
e
e
m
m
e
e
e
(A
M
aj
/
7
e
e
@
e
@�@
@
m
\
\
m
m
m
e
e
e
CL
0
$
e
°
4
u
cn
E
u
d
/
\
\
e
\
\
$
_
CU
7
/
»
»
2
7
=
/
#
§
ƒ
e
'
\ =
E
/
®
a
\
3
o
\
°
E
§
/
�'
2
$
e
o
o
@
/ }
2
/
\
2
2
e
§
\
0
%
%
§
3
/
\
E
/
�
\
}
x
e
§
a
4
3
/
CU�
\
3
2
u§
�
\
E
ƒ/
w
/
2
z
I
R
CU
Ln
§
_
u
=3
m
\
°0
5
§
u
e
/
°
=
L ®
�
/
_
@
t
/
\
\
\
3
\
$
E
ƒ
m
_
/
/
$
/
\
\
}
°
o
f
E
E
u\
0\
9
\
E
_—
§
3
q
o
3@
°
e
§
- o>_
@
=
E
%
E
z
*
®
�
2
/ \
?
/
-
3
k
\
/
\
E
q
g
ms
s®
$
v
2
/
f
E
u
�
g
o
/
f
LU
�
e
aj
cu/ to
5
E
M
2
�
/
2
aj
.
®
2
\
\
»
\
2
\
)
2
\
)
°
/
\
\
/
/
(
\
8
E
x
g
z
e
$
e
3/
\
e§)
e
<
R
\
CL
}
m
2
e
E\�
(
2
2
/
2
2$
§
7
R
k/
/
0
/
E
Ln
2
L[
%
k
u
e
E
e
3
—
0
�
§
\
_
§
/
e
2
k
(
\
/
/Eb
E
LU
\
o
3
±LU
e
<
e
§
�
§2cu
e
toi7i
7
�

rNj\
e
e
m
e
m
e
\
e
m
\\
m
\@
m
m
e»
\\
e
e@
e
m
e
\
e
m
\\
m
e
\@
m
m
e\
e
=
e
e
\
/
cu
Ca
u
7
�
7
7
I=
u
f»
E
7
e
e
e)
e
u
[
e
e e
E
e
e
\
\
e
<•
t\
t
'
e
t
m t
>
>
M
e
\
e
e
o
m
E
-
e
o
G
<
o
C-
e=_
\
mm
—
—a
<
<=)M
—.-
0
_
=
z
\
=
z
z
=_
E 9
z
d
d
m
e
y
u
>
<
{
%
�
-
t
%
_ _
o
<
<
$
$
=
e
>
<
e
c
_
<
_
0
=
m G
e
_
=
z
o
o
o
/
o=
=
_
_
E
z
z
z
'
z'E
>
0
2
—
Qj
�
e
Ca
}
§
$
Y
CL
\
/
.Lap<
2
G
0
m
\
:
>
'
a
ƒ
@
u
$
e}
t
°
u
\¥
u
E
—
g
'
0=
e
e
e
CU
e
e
a-
e
°
/
o
Z
Z=
a
2
/\
o
o
2
cu—
\
y
o\
u
/
3
2
®\
_
m
z
z
E
$§§
/
2\
2
u
)
e
e
cu
e
>
o
-0
_
•
/
e
—
�
/
°
<
/
o
e
cu
\
\
\
\
\
4
>
\
2
u
/
e
0
u
>
e
2
0
0
@
z
�
cu
)
(AC
e
cu
CU
0
E
c
2
�
/
/
ƒ
/
c
}
u
m
—
\
/
/
ƒ
/$'
�/
0
@
E\
o
m
m
e
0
2
=
_
»
\
u
\
~
u
»
9
/
/
/
\
/
/
t
0
cu
<
e
�
�
t
/
4
4=
u=
e
\
e
m
$
_
®
®
3
@
u
�
0
e<
ra
u
e=
3
�
0
-0
\
c
e
/
G
a
3
a
<
e
E
2
e
0LU
\
<
0
}
f
�
LL
3

�t
»
r*lj
e
e
\
\
r*lj
m
e
e
\
�t
r*lj
e
\
@
\
�t
e
\
\
@
m
e
e
\
@
@
e
@
\
\
E
t
°
E
_
cu
o
�
<
•
E
<
-
/
2
e
�
/
\
*z
e
e
-0
t
�
%
t
#
-0
e
ƒ
u
e
g
CU 2
2
o/
3
§
2
$$
cr
§
2
/
C ®
2
\
Ca
�
/
\
/
/
2
�
-0
�
/
°
2
ƒ
%
/
o
2
<
R
\
<
<
o
u
\
o
_
«
@
#
o
_
/
�
z
u
u
cr-
2
>
2
�
E
{
e
t
k&
_
2
/
2
_
e
@
2
2
u
\
u
o'
g
m
2
to
/
®
e
e
2
3
3=
t
�
o
u
=
z
tCL
=
0
®>
7
7
2
#
�
m
\
CL
CU
/
cu
m
m
E
/
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
cu
\
/
)
(
c
\
>-
c
=
e
E
2
n
>
2
-.j
•
o=ƒ
E
_
\
\
2
2
2
/
<
<
/
O
%
/ \
O
LL
G
\
k
/
E
m
:
\
\
2
\
4
$
/
E
o
7
>
®
=
o
\
/
LL
\
u
5
/
7
\
0
\
§
cu
\
/
t
t
®
/
\
Ca
(a
>
e
\
}
/
\\
/
ƒ
\
E
m
=
E°
/
)
t
E
E
®
t
e�
§
5
2
t
=
/
3
a
\
\
/
CU
/
\
LU
cu
j
/
2
a
/
/
\
u
E
/
<
to
°
t
3
4§
R=
2
$
°
e
®
�
®
2
x
_
\
$
d
m
cu
c
/
\
\
/_
4
\
\
�
e
\
k0
:
Ln
cuM
CL
cu
4
E
cu
41
Ln
0
2
/
t
Ln
/
/
<

M
N
W*
Jn
m
++
O
H

APPENDIX G
WATERS OF THE US IMPACT MAPS

)/7 " X
Legend
LOD
0
o Limits of Disturbance - 944.6 Acres
�a0,�
- Project Study Limits - 1,456.4 Acres
Permanent Stream Impact - 46,959 If
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Perennial Stream (R3)
- ... -... - - Other Stream
I \�
I
Permanent Wetland Impact - 9.1 Acres o e`
�O
Ponds
Wetlands
I
i
I
0
0
_GO)\
IarC
Carve
r.
1 i
J /1
i
0 1,100 2,200 4,400
Feet _)
•t
S—CM ; t
-- CO. 0,
2
I
Sheet 3
Sheet
_A-
�J
I
NOTES:
7
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
Ir
I
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY
1
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
i
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA.
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
_GO)\
IarC
Carve
r.
1 i
J /1
i
0 1,100 2,200 4,400
Feet _)
•t
S—CM ; t
-- CO. 0,
2
I
Sheet 3
Sheet
_A-
�J
°I
�I
- - ►III'► � � � � -ly I
TIF
I�
I
I
1
1
1
1
Sheet 4 Sheet 5 \v -7
LO
04 0
04 E
LU a
I , ,
a�
I' I
h I / vWU O
0
O
F ao 00 z0
W M
` DY�'"� 1 _ �• w H N In O
auto*"Rd d Q eF C d
_ m z p - U 12�
laoal I Q O U ~ w
Q
v �o 0
-- -7
7
'
Ir
I
°I
�I
- - ►III'► � � � � -ly I
TIF
I�
I
I
1
1
1
1
Sheet 4 Sheet 5 \v -7
LO
04 0
04 E
LU a
I , ,
a�
I' I
h I / vWU O
0
O
F ao 00 z0
W M
` DY�'"� 1 _ �• w H N In O
auto*"Rd d Q eF C d
_ m z p - U 12�
laoal I Q O U ~ w
Q
v �o 0
--
�I w
E0 CL
o
L ^
a O
o z
a W > DATE
08 09 2017
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
aI G
0\,. \ III DESIGNED BY
------------
` � / yea\ I
AWL
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
1 " = 1/100,
if 11
I
I '
c. to
—71
if
1-L L_
UJ
i
W I (5aLL
- - - -�- i------------�e�T ' '1- LIJ U O
JessQi. _ U)
�
auks=RdC
1UJ
' \`\ �•. Z
, \ \ \ /I / 1 0
_IL 1 n
cc
I III r i �C yIL_J_=-=L="J fI \C� I I - \ Cattle th n
-Dr — -� ;--- � � ^
°fie° L
e
Ii
Q
a"verFar,n �J ' � / L 1�1 Katmandu;Dr- �..�
Li
J
LU
r�Ton�ker r. -DI r ehe-1i0 9iQ. --IIF
1% If -- - - -
—II
a
10
i
�- ---IN
.—�--
i
TWIT �a<�%�f `/ JOB NO.
- -�CLlaon St yhh' T , " 3�-- -----
,vN✓I 1�' / �2 393 9
qj
ate_ I �� SHEET NO.
i 0
7
O
1
� N
i
Ln
Cal O
,
Lu
_J
��
c
\
I
lox
N
--
�I w
E0 CL
o
L ^
a O
o z
a W > DATE
08 09 2017
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
aI G
0\,. \ III DESIGNED BY
------------
` � / yea\ I
AWL
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
1 " = 1/100,
if 11
I
I '
c. to
—71
if
1-L L_
UJ
i
W I (5aLL
- - - -�- i------------�e�T ' '1- LIJ U O
JessQi. _ U)
�
auks=RdC
1UJ
' \`\ �•. Z
, \ \ \ /I / 1 0
_IL 1 n
cc
I III r i �C yIL_J_=-=L="J fI \C� I I - \ Cattle th n
-Dr — -� ;--- � � ^
°fie° L
e
Ii
Q
a"verFar,n �J ' � / L 1�1 Katmandu;Dr- �..�
Li
J
LU
r�Ton�ker r. -DI r ehe-1i0 9iQ. --IIF
1% If -- - - -
—II
a
10
i
�- ---IN
.—�--
i
TWIT �a<�%�f `/ JOB NO.
- -�CLlaon St yhh' T , " 3�-- -----
,vN✓I 1�' / �2 393 9
qj
ate_ I �� SHEET NO.

Legend
LOD
o Limits of Disturbance - 944.6 Acres
� GOI
F"—"l
Project Study Limits - 1,456.4 Acres
Permanent Stream Impact - 46,959 If
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Perennial Stream (R3)
– ... .... – – Other Stream
Permanent Wetland Impact - 9.1 Acres
Ponds
Wetlands
ki[0119:'3
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP.
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE.
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA.
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
0 400 800 1,600
Feet
o.�
i
/ LOD `
/ o
0
LOD
r
1z) LOD
0
0
J\
OO
o
J
LOD LOD { - LOo J
>y� l \` too ! -
10,0
`goo
�o
0
7
W
Q ~
E
Q
O
4)
> DATE
a�
08/09/2017
i�
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
------------
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
1 " = 400'
Q
Q
� a
J
MlogO W
Ile
VLL
� O
ce LU
> O Q
I Z
Z J
F Z
0` O
VO
ZZ U)
00 cC
W >-
UJ L Q
N
W
a
JOB NO.
39329
SHEET NO.
2 OF 6
Lo
N �
co
C
W
a �
p
L
Q
W
W
LL_
U
aLL
0
o�z
Mo
O
0
aQ
—
�'*
c
a
z0
)U
<O
caX
U-
w
Q
�LO
1
z
a o
v
(�
V)
N
i
m
00
N
L
W
O J
O
7
W
Q ~
E
Q
O
4)
> DATE
a�
08/09/2017
i�
DRAWN BY
L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
------------
CHECKED BY
A. REUSCHE
SCALE
1 " = 400'
Q
Q
� a
J
MlogO W
Ile
VLL
� O
ce LU
> O Q
I Z
Z J
F Z
0` O
VO
ZZ U)
00 cC
W >-
UJ L Q
N
W
a
JOB NO.
39329
SHEET NO.
2 OF 6

o
Legend - I --- .------ ----
Edwin-Robertson,Rd
i I f
LOD . - \ - O
Fo Limits of Disturbance - 944.6 Acres ° — goo
°o,
r-----� / !° r0
Project Study Limits - 1,456.4 Acres a
Permanent Stream Impact - 46,959 If I r
a Lo
Intermittent Stream (R4) I o j N o
o co ,
/� o c
o — `oo I I cv Q
° OD
Perennial Stream (R3) ; oD ; w E c
OOl 00, °O, - = a L
,: X00 Q��•_..b/ O�+µ�I 0 >
_..._..._..._... Other Stream - LOD ` E LU LU•-
�"LOD
Lr -
Permanent Wetland Impact - 9.1 Acres / �'� o % a o a' O
o° Q�j ca
Ponds �o a
o v
1 / z a �' X U
°° 101111111110 1�11111UIIIIIIIIIU111111111o ' o �%�' QO U W
H
Wetlands a�a++++� auto ° o °° o O o
ILJ
z
0
O
02
t r� ~
... m O N W
00
SCM C
i
p0A li•� SCM ; F
W
l` p01 j r , I ; Q
°O� °o, — ao, _ °O, _ °o, °o, °o, °o, °o,I
—..—.. �.
Pump ,' o 5 > DATE
Station j / / ° > °o, 007 `Q0A) ? 08/09/2017
Cn / DRAWN BY
j L. MAJOR
DESIGNED BY
------------
o°
I o� — -- � O o �, �• 1. 1
°O,
^— (1Ol �..•.5�° j j CHECKED BY
001
01
J�i l
SCALE
1 1 " = 400'
°
0
o Q
O°�
j
o U)
01 / �• Q
----- I L i
' I
J W
j _ Charlie Jay_Ra
NOTES: ---------------- --- , I I
1. WATERS OF THE U.S. WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY / I ILL
_ --, I
LIMITS HAVE BEEN GPS LOCATED BY TIMMONS GROUP. LU V o I I
2. WATERS OF THE U.S. HAVE NOT BEEN CONFIRMED BY I _ U)
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. ; I I W
3. PROJECT STUDY LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE. 1 I W
4. TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON USGS LIDAR DATA. IleI
5. COWARDIN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS ARE BASED 1 I I o Q
SOLELY ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS. NO FORMAL STREAM I I Z
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY WAS COMPLETED TO 1 I I I J
DETERMINE THESE COWARDIN CLASSIFICATIONS. I F Z
�1
U)
Ile
w >.
UJ L
[ -
I
W
—
I
I I
0 400 800 1,600
Feet
_ _ I JOB NO.
39329
/ 1
SHEET NO.

NOIldI'dDS�4 NOISIATd
IeIuauauoaiAu3 I ABOJOUuaal I a.inlan.ilse.ilul
Lu00-suoujW/1"MMM g606"09g"ti08xv f 0089"OOZ"ti08 -j31
gZZcZ vA `puoLuuoi& 100c apns `Aem>ljed siapinos 6006
30Idd0 31Vd 10d2100
3Hl 1`d (13 ]]Vd32ld ONIM`d J(l SIHl
leiluepisam I juawdolanaa GJ!S
'Saf10 Hon0VH1 aWGlH3V NOISIA unoA 449Walp* d n ou 19
SNOWWIJL
------------- ------
O -
- r ,
_
\-------------- '
J Evil
am,I fi _
1
I
\ I I I
I '
I I
as 1
U
N LO Q O � C
U U 07 1-- pap U)C
Q Q 0) u) LL LLI Q J L
(C)(� C)Z0 QQ�2L
0- -� E lFW62Q00(
i g 0 (� mW.W'J�
W � d Z
U E E : �C]OWQ�UVjc
E ami E 00z OWZ=
J L. N N = Q W z CL 0 i
Cn Cn L E �p>WQO J>C
D � N JILL UCe(
� Cn (6 N � O — C] W C
O -0 u) u) u) U W g � [
U)U (6 E C:0 L (6 to d J (n Q m
(1) E L a� a� E 7 WW��°a°�0F
O L (1)L L = Z= 0 C] L
a) a 0 a a W�U�%�Jc
Lr-- 0 W 0LcW0 LL LL
d Z W
OD
= 1 j O> U Z L
W = W LLJ Q -) 0
o o
Q �
J L alI l L--= I7 ~O � 5 = 0- U 0 i
/s
/ -- -- -- -- —1
r
�T I
\ I
i
-�
�r I
RVA" AWA 11
t I
y-.
N
O
O LL
FI
I
O
O
C-7
PXW'WIlM-6ZE6E\L[0Z81,80\sjoedwj pUeljaM\SIJ\ej!Se6aW Aluno0 uosaad 6ZE6E\S08\:b :filed
Lu o
aQ
0
m p
J
m
Lu
V
LUV)u
i
w o
u ;;
L
dVW Sl:)VdWI 'S'f1 3Hl =10 SN3JLVM IVNouxciSI nr A'UVNIWI13Nd
OLU rn
m
O M
o
z
Lu CJ
VNI10NV:) HINON 'AlNnOD NOSN3d
311S=V93H A.LNnO:) NOSN3d
�1b4
/
/
/
/
leiluepisam I juawdolanaa GJ!S
'Saf10 Hon0VH1 aWGlH3V NOISIA unoA 449Walp* d n ou 19
SNOWWIJL
------------- ------
O -
- r ,
_
\-------------- '
J Evil
am,I fi _
1
I
\ I I I
I '
I I
as 1
U
N LO Q O � C
U U 07 1-- pap U)C
Q Q 0) u) LL LLI Q J L
(C)(� C)Z0 QQ�2L
0- -� E lFW62Q00(
i g 0 (� mW.W'J�
W � d Z
U E E : �C]OWQ�UVjc
E ami E 00z OWZ=
J L. N N = Q W z CL 0 i
Cn Cn L E �p>WQO J>C
D � N JILL UCe(
� Cn (6 N � O — C] W C
O -0 u) u) u) U W g � [
U)U (6 E C:0 L (6 to d J (n Q m
(1) E L a� a� E 7 WW��°a°�0F
O L (1)L L = Z= 0 C] L
a) a 0 a a W�U�%�Jc
Lr-- 0 W 0LcW0 LL LL
d Z W
OD
= 1 j O> U Z L
W = W LLJ Q -) 0
o o
Q �
J L alI l L--= I7 ~O � 5 = 0- U 0 i
/s
/ -- -- -- -- —1
r
�T I
\ I
i
-�
�r I
RVA" AWA 11
t I
y-.
N
O
O LL
FI
I
O
O
C-7
PXW'WIlM-6ZE6E\L[0Z81,80\sjoedwj pUeljaM\SIJ\ej!Se6aW Aluno0 uosaad 6ZE6E\S08\:b :filed
Lu o
aQ
0
m p
J
m
Lu
V
LUV)u
m W
U
Lu
Q
w o
u ;;
L
dVW Sl:)VdWI 'S'f1 3Hl =10 SN3JLVM IVNouxciSI nr A'UVNIWI13Nd
OLU rn
m
O M
o
z
Lu CJ
VNI10NV:) HINON 'AlNnOD NOSN3d
311S=V93H A.LNnO:) NOSN3d
�1b4
leiluepisam I juawdolanaa GJ!S
'Saf10 Hon0VH1 aWGlH3V NOISIA unoA 449Walp* d n ou 19
SNOWWIJL
------------- ------
O -
- r ,
_
\-------------- '
J Evil
am,I fi _
1
I
\ I I I
I '
I I
as 1
U
N LO Q O � C
U U 07 1-- pap U)C
Q Q 0) u) LL LLI Q J L
(C)(� C)Z0 QQ�2L
0- -� E lFW62Q00(
i g 0 (� mW.W'J�
W � d Z
U E E : �C]OWQ�UVjc
E ami E 00z OWZ=
J L. N N = Q W z CL 0 i
Cn Cn L E �p>WQO J>C
D � N JILL UCe(
� Cn (6 N � O — C] W C
O -0 u) u) u) U W g � [
U)U (6 E C:0 L (6 to d J (n Q m
(1) E L a� a� E 7 WW��°a°�0F
O L (1)L L = Z= 0 C] L
a) a 0 a a W�U�%�Jc
Lr-- 0 W 0LcW0 LL LL
d Z W
OD
= 1 j O> U Z L
W = W LLJ Q -) 0
o o
Q �
J L alI l L--= I7 ~O � 5 = 0- U 0 i
/s
/ -- -- -- -- —1
r
�T I
\ I
i
-�
�r I
RVA" AWA 11
t I
y-.
N
O
O LL
FI
I
O
O
C-7
PXW'WIlM-6ZE6E\L[0Z81,80\sjoedwj pUeljaM\SIJ\ej!Se6aW Aluno0 uosaad 6ZE6E\S08\:b :filed

NOIldI'dDS�I4 NOISIATd
IeIuauauoaiAu3 I A6oiou43al I a.inlan.ilse.ilui
Lu00•suoujW/1•MMM g606.098•ti08xv f 00g9.00Z•ti08 X31
gZZcZ vA `puouauoi3 100c apns `Aem>ljed siapinos 6006
30Idd0 31Vd 10d2100
3Hl 1`d (13 ]]Vd32ld ONIM`d J(l SIHl
L
I
;o
Fr
- -1 - ge{hel_HiII�SchoohRd - -
ieiluepisam I juawdolanaa GJ!S
'9af10 Hon0VH1 aWGIHOV NOISIA unoAdnoug SNOWWIJL
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
I �
I �
I I
I
I �
I �
1 I
I 1
1 I
I I
IF ------
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
—L L
C)
o LL
a� Sao oQ
U) N 0) U 0 O W WW O
N LO Q D U 0
U U 0) i—� m�j0(n
Q Q 0) cnW wQw I
U z 0 Q Q
w O
w O
c� E a~ W�LO
O O U U)
U U �_ � W% T- in m w a J Q Z (n Q
_ m m E m � o 0 z Q 0� Z� U
ami a> = Q w 0�zwz-W0 Z z o
� Cn �_ b ~pQWQOJ j

NOIldIdDS�4 NOISIATd
IeIuauauoaiAu3 I A6oJou43al I e inlan.ilse.ilul
uJ00-suOujW/ -MMM g606"09g"ti08xV f 0089"OOZ"ti08 -j31
gZZcZ vA `puoLuuoi& 100c apns `Aem>ljed saapino8 6006
30L -L-10 31Vd 10d2100
3Hl 1`d (13 ]]Vd32ld ONIM`d 1(1 SIHl
jeijuepisam I juawdolanaa ajiS
"9wn0 Hon0VH1 aWG1H3V N0181A unoA 449
Walp* d n ou 19
----- I—_ --j
+ r--
I
IJOAX011pl!M
-- — - - — -- -
_ I
I I
f0 I w I
lay I ISI i � �
N I
--- -- Kelly -Carver Rd
I� 1
------------ L ----------
I
J 1
I , I
+I '
± I I
7 ,
it I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I I I I (r,
I-�
1 I
� ub Lak_e�_--�--- __ �- I � �1I-� � �•a I I
lxi
a I I I I 1 I
I I i JI I
i II I r
n /G uno0 I ) I 1 I /
- �p21 q I� } r---T—rte'. / / / I I \ 1
/
'Al
SNOWWIJL
---------------
/ I
1 I
� I /
Lu o
aQ
o
m p
-'
m
Lu
LUV)u
m W
U
Lu
LU Q)
u ;;
L
dVW S1:)VdWI 'S'f1 3H1 =10 SN3JLVM IVNouxciSI nr A'UVNIWI13Nd
O rn
m
O M
o
z
Lu O
VNI10NV:) HINON 'AlNnOD NOSN3d
3JL1S=V93W A.LNnO:) NOSN3d
ilea
jeijuepisam I juawdolanaa ajiS
"9wn0 Hon0VH1 aWG1H3V N0181A unoA 449
Walp* d n ou 19
----- I—_ --j
+ r--
I
IJOAX011pl!M
-- — - - — -- -
_ I
I I
f0 I w I
lay I ISI i � �
N I
--- -- Kelly -Carver Rd
I� 1
------------ L ----------
I
J 1
I , I
+I '
± I I
7 ,
it I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I I I I (r,
I-�
1 I
� ub Lak_e�_--�--- __ �- I � �1I-� � �•a I I
lxi
a I I I I 1 I
I I i JI I
i II I r
n /G uno0 I ) I 1 I /
- �p21 q I� } r---T—rte'. / / / I I \ 1
/
'Al
SNOWWIJL
---------------
/ I
1 I
� I /
II
f
(D�a0 C)
N N � Q 0 O C
U 0 CA F__
Q Q CA U) LL w Q J L
(C)(� I Uz0 QQ��L
' 0- -� E dHWU)a000<
W d Z
U E E : HC]OWQ�UUjc
m E m m E W Z z U W z=
J +�- N CU 2QLLIZQ'��Oi
U) 70 >, Cn cn b E �O>WQ0 J;c
ami LL U[e(
4-Cn CU CU cu CU U) 0— W C
0 0 70 U)U)U)�� W 2�C
U) 0 (13 E 0 L (13 to 0 [L a J U) Q m
(1) E L (1) (1) E _0WUWI Y_>-maOF
0L C� L L C:= Z= 0 C] L
0- O 0- 0- WLLUU)0-zJc
LOD 17-1
� W LL >-� d Z W
LL
C j O> O< U Z L
W = W uj Q -) O
o o
Q �
J L aIl 0= a U 0 i
Z J N M Lo U) <
/
/
I % /
/
I /
vas/
I '
/ �� \
1\
/
N
C) CU
o LL
F1
O
O
C-7
PXW'WIlM-6ZE6E\L[0Z81,80\sjoedwj pUeljaM\SIJ\ajlSe69W Ajuno0 uosaad 6ZCM909V1 :41ed
4�
I
II
f
(D�a0 C)
N N � Q 0 O C
U 0 CA F__
Q Q CA U) LL w Q J L
(C)(� I Uz0 QQ��L
' 0- -� E dHWU)a000<
W d Z
U E E : HC]OWQ�UUjc
m E m m E W Z z U W z=
J +�- N CU 2QLLIZQ'��Oi
U) 70 >, Cn cn b E �O>WQ0 J;c
ami LL U[e(
4-Cn CU CU cu CU U) 0— W C
0 0 70 U)U)U)�� W 2�C
U) 0 (13 E 0 L (13 to 0 [L a J U) Q m
(1) E L (1) (1) E _0WUWI Y_>-maOF
0L C� L L C:= Z= 0 C] L
0- O 0- 0- WLLUU)0-zJc
LOD 17-1
� W LL >-� d Z W
LL
C j O> O< U Z L
W = W uj Q -) O
o o
Q �
J L aIl 0= a U 0 i
Z J N M Lo U) <
/
/
I % /
/
I /
vas/
I '
/ �� \
1\
/
N
C) CU
o LL
F1
O
O
C-7
PXW'WIlM-6ZE6E\L[0Z81,80\sjoedwj pUeljaM\SIJ\ajlSe69W Ajuno0 uosaad 6ZCM909V1 :41ed