20171507 Ver 1_401 Application_20171117

M McADAMS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: November 22, 2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS
To: Ms. Karen Huggins Re: CG 4088 Application (PCN)
NC Division of Water Resources Hasse Avenue Extension
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street Job #: CRS -16000
Archdale Building 9th Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1 am sending you the following items:
❑ Drawings ❑ Letter ❑ Statement of Qualifications
❑ Specifications ® Submittal ❑ Other
❑ Plans ❑ Prints
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
5
Copies
PCN and Supporting Documentation
1
Check
$570
1
CD
Digital Submittal
Transmitted as checked below:
® For approval
❑ For your use
❑ As requested
Remarks:
Copy to:
® For review + comment
❑ Other
❑ Other
r --
Signature:
Kevin Yates
Senior Environmental Consultant,
Water Resources + Infrastructure
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 / 919. 361. 5000

'J McADAMS
November 21, 2017
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St.
Archdale Bldg. 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088 Authorization Request
Hasse Avenue Extension
Wake County, North Carolina
CRS -16000
Dear Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of the Town of Apex, McAdams is submitting a pre -construction
notification (PCN) for a North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources — Division of Water Resources (DWR) 401 Water Quality
Certification General Certification 4088 authorization for impacts associated
with the Hasse Avenue Extension in Apex, North Carolina. The purpose of the
Hasse Avenue Extension is to construct a secondary arterial roadway alignment
from the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road
that will provide continuous vehicular traffic from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive
Chapel Road in the western section of Wake County, North Carolina, which is
experiencing increased traffic demands. Please find enclosed for your review
the following items:
-Signed Agent Authorization
-Figure 1 - USGS Quad — North Hill
-Figure 2 - Wake County Soil Survey (sheet # 65)
-Figure 3 - Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination — Existing
Conditions Exhibit
-USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-01993, Approved and Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination, issued November 23, 2016
The John R. McAdams
-USFWS letter dated September 16, 2016
Company, Inc.
-NC SHPO letter dated April 6, 2017
-Town of Apex Water Resources Department, Stream Buffer
Raleigh / Durham, NC
Determination, issued November 1, 2016 (Apex #16-010)
2905 Meridian Parkway
-Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
Durham, north Carolina 2771a
-North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services, Mitigation Acceptance
[phone]
Letter, July 5, 2017
-Figure 3 — PCN — Existing Conditions Exhibit
Charlotte, NC
-Figure 4 — PCN - Proposed Impacts - Overall Site Plan
3436 roringdon way
-PCN — Crossing 1 - Plan View
Suite 1i0
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
McAdamsCo.com
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 2 of 9
-PCN — Crossing 1 - Profile & Cross Section View
-PCN — Crossing 2 - Plan View
-PCN — Crossing 2 - Profile & Cross Section View
-PCN — Crossing 3 - Plan View
-PCN — Crossing 3 - Profile & Cross Section View
PROJECT HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The project area for the proposed Hasse Avenue extends from an existing
residential subdivision (Sweetwater Residential Subdivision) located to the
north, crosses Reedy Branch, enters the northwestern portion of the proposed
Linden development, and extends southwest beyond the proposed Linden
development to Olive Chapel Road. Future extension of Hasse Avenue is
included on the Town of Apex Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector
Street Plan; therefore, the future alignment crosses the property located at 2505
Olive Chapel Road (Wake County PIN # 0722411102) and intersects with
Olive Chapel Road. There are three stream features (Stream Feature A [Reedy
Branch], Stream Feature B 1, and Stream Feature AA) and two wetland features
(Wetland D and Wetland B) along the proposed Hasse Avenue alignment. See
attached Figure 3 (Existing Conditions) for the location of these features.
Sections of Hasse Avenue located within the proposed Linden Subdivision have
already received a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (see attached
USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-01993; issued November 23, 2016). A
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) is needed for the future
alignment of Hasse Avenue where it crosses the property located at 2505 Olive
Chapel Road (Wake County PIN # 0722411102). The study area of Hasse
Avenue that requires a PJD consists primarily of pasture fields, small forested
areas, and stream feature AA.
There is a 100 -year floodplain and floodway associated with Reedy Branch
within the project area (NC FIRM Map 3720072200J; effective date May 2,
2006). A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) was submitted on May
3, 2017 to the locality and the state. Based on hydrologic and hydraulic analyses
performed in accordance with standard engineering practice, the proposed
encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels within the
community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge, and the
requirements set forth in the Town of Apex regulations will be met. The U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a letter on September 16, 2016 (see
attached) stating that, based on the USFWS records and a review of information
provided by McAdams, the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 3 of 9
federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Therefore, the USFWS believes the requirements under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled. The North Carolina Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources—State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO)
issued a letter on April 6, 2017 (see attached) stating that SHPO is aware of no
historic resources which would be affected by the project; and therefore, have
no comment on the project.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The western section of Wake County, North Carolina is experiencing increased
traffic demands along U.S. Highway 64 (located to the north), Olive Chapel
Road (located to the south), Kelly Road (located to the east), and New Hill Road
(located to the west). The extension of Hasse Avenue from the existing
Sweetwater Residential Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road will provide
continuous vehicular traffic from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road and
alleviate existing traffic demands within this section of western Wake County.
Hasse Avenue is proposed to extend from the existing Sweetwater Residential
Subdivision located to the north, cross Reedy Branch, enter the northwestern
portion of the proposed Linden development, and extend beyond the proposed
Linden development to the southwest to intersect with Olive Chapel Road.
Future extension of Hasse Avenue is located on the Town of Apex
Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector Street Plan (see Figure 4 —
Overall Site Plan).
The Hasse Avenue Extension project consists of three (3) phases. Phase 1 is
proposed to be constructed first, and Phases 2 and 3 are proposed to be
constructed later. Phase 1 proposes to extend Hasse Avenue from the existing
Sweetwater Residential Subdivision, cross Reedy Branch, and enter the
northwestern section of the proposed Linden development. As a result, there
are stream impacts (Stream Feature A [Reedy Branch]) associated with Phase
1. The future alignment of Phases 2 and 3 proposes to extend Hasse Avenue
beyond the proposed Linden development through the property located at 2505
Olive Chapel Road (Wake County PIN # 07224 1 1 1 02) and intersect with Olive
Chapel Road. Phases 2 and 3 propose to impact two intermittent stream features
(Stream Features B 1 and AA) and one wetland feature (Wetland B). Table 1
lists the stream and wetland impacts associated with all phases of the Hasse
Avenue Extension.
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 4 of 9
For the construction of Phase 1 of the Hasse Avenue Extension, traditional
equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving
equipment, graders, and earth movers.
Table 1. Stream and Wetland Im acts
WETLAND
Impact
Impact Type
Wetland Type
Impact Area
Number
(acres)
Wetland B —
Permanent (Fill)
Headwater Wetland; PFO
0.005
Crossing 2
Total Wetland Impacts
0.005
STREAM
Impact
Impact Type
Stream Name and Type
Impact
Number
Length
(linear feet)
Stream A —
Temporary (Coffer Dam
Reed Branch (Stream A);
28
Crossing 1
& Diversion Channel)
Perennial
Stream A —
Permanent (Culvert)
Reed Branch (Stream A);
69
Crossing 1
Perennial
Stream A —
Permanent (Riprap
Reed Branch (Stream A);
81
Crossing 1
Dissipator Pad)
Perennial
Stream B 1—
Temporary (Coffer Dam
unnamed tributary to Reedy
27
Crossing 2
& Diversion Channel)
Branch (Stream B 1); Intermittent
Stream B 1—
Permanent (Culvert)
unnamed tributary to Reed
93
Crossing 2
Branch (Stream B 1); Intermittent
Stream B 1—
Permanent (Riprap
unnamed tributary to Reed
25
Crossing 2
Dissipator Pad)
Branch (Stream B 1); Intermittent
Stream AA —
Temporary, Coffer Dam
unnamed tributary to Reed
27
Crossing 3
& Diversion Channel
Branch (Stream AA); Intermittent
Stream AA —
Permanent (Culvert)
unnamed tributary to Reed
91
Crossing 3
Branch (Stream AA); Intermittent
Stream AA —
Permanent (Riprap
unnamed tributary to Reed
21
Crossing 3
Dissipator Pad)
Branch (Stream AA); Intermittent
Total Stream Impacts
462
Of the total 4621f of stream impacts associated with all three crossings, 1271f
will be associated with riprap dissipator pads, which will be installed flush with
the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage. In
addition, there will be another 821f of temporary stream impact associated with
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 5 of 9
the construction of coffer dams and diversion channels for all three crossings.
Therefore, there will be a total of 3801f of permanent stream impact associated
with three (3) culvert installations for all three (3) crossings.
For Phase 1, at Crossing 1, there are a total of total 1781f of stream impacts, of
which 81 if will be associated with a riprap dissipator pad, 28 if will be
temporary stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and
diversion channel, and 691f will be permanent stream impact associated with
a culvert installation. There are no wetland impacts associated with Phase 1 at
Crossing 1. For Phase 2 of Hasse Avenue at Crossing 2, there are a total of total
145 if of stream impacts, of which 25 if will be associated with a riprap
dissipator pad, 27 if will be temporary stream impact associated with the
construction of a coffer dam and diversion channel, and 93 if will be permanent
stream impact associated with a culvert installation. In addition, there are 0.005
acres of wetland impact (Wetland B) associated with Phase 2 at Crossing 2. For
Phase 3 at Crossing 3, there are a total of total 1391f of stream impacts, of which
21 if will be associated with a riprap dissipator pad, 27 if will be temporary
stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and diversion
channel, and 91 if will be permanent stream impact associated with a culvert
installation. There are no wetland impacts proposed for Phase 3 at Crossing 3.
Stormwater Mana eg ment
The proposed stormwater management plan for the project will be designed to
protect the downstream environment. The plan incorporates stormwater
management techniques to manage both water quantity and quality aspects of
site runoff. Stormwater management for the project will be accomplished by
incorporating engineered stormwater best management practice facilities to
capture and treat the stormwater runoff from developed areas. The proposed
development is located within the Cape Fear River basin with all stormwater
runoff draining into Reedy Branch, also located in the Jordan Lake Watershed.
Per the Town of Apex regulations, stormwater management on this site shall
meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set
forth in the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION:
The project was designed to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and
wetlands. Due to increased traffic demands along U.S. Highway 64 (located to
the north), Olive Chapel Road (located to the south), Kelly Road (located to the
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 6 of 9
east), and New Hill Road (located to the west), a north -to -south secondary
arterial roadway alignment is required to have continuous vehicular traffic flow.
To provide a north -to -south secondary arterial roadway, The Town of Apex
Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector Street Plan prescribes the
alignment of Hasse Avenue from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road. As a
result, the alignment of Hasse Avenue from U.S. Highway 64 was incorporated
into the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision. To continue the extension
of Hasse Avenue through the proposed Linden development (located south of
the Sweetwater Residential Subdivision) and terminate at Olive Chapel Road,
the alignment for Hasse Avenue must cross Reedy Branch at the proposed
location (see Crossing 1; Phase 1) and extend into the property located at 2505
Olive Chapel Road (see Crossings 2 & 3; Phases 2 & 3).
For Hasse Avenue Phase 1 (Crossing 1), various alternatives were examined
with consideration of the following: a) existing traffic demands along U.S.
Highway 64, Olive Chapel Road, Kelly Road, and New Hill Road; b) access to
the proposed Linden development and the existing Sweetwater Residential
Subdivision; c) emergency vehicular access to the proposed Linden
development; and d) a no build option. Not building the extension of Hasse
Avenue to terminate at Olive Chapel Road was determined not to be a viable
option since this would not alleviate traffic demands along U.S. Highway 64,
Olive Chapel Road, Kelly Road, and New Hill Road. The extension of Hasse
Avenue would provide additional emergency vehicular access to the proposed
Linden development, and provide a north -to -south connection between U.S.
Highway 64 and Olive Chapel Road, thereby alleviating traffic along U.S.
Highway 64, Olive Chapel Road, Kelly Road, and New Hill Road. Due to the
alignment configuration of Hasse Avenue through the existing Sweetwater
Residential Subdivision, the crossing of Reedy Branch by Hasse Avenue is
limited to only one location that takes into account geometric configuration
design, construction constraints, and safe vehicular passage. The alignment of
future Phases 2 & 3 of Hasse Avenue will be directed along a route which
proposes to impact the least jurisdictional streams and wetlands located on the
property at 2505 Olive Chapel Road so that a terminus connection to Olive
Chapel Road could be achieved. Additionally, each road crossing alignment
(Crossings 1, 2, and 3) has been designed to the minimum size necessary to
promote safe vehicular passage.
Road crossings and culvert impacts at stream features (Stream Feature A
[Reedy Branch], Stream Feature B1, and Stream Feature AA) have been
minimized to the maximum extent practicable and have been aligned to cross
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 7 of 9
streams as close to 90 degrees as possible. Dissipator pads associated with each
culvert will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow
for aquatic life passage. There will be minimal temporary impacts associated
with coffer dams and diversion channels, which will be used to conduct the
proposed work within dry conditions. The use of the temporary coffer dams and
diversion channels will be less than 90 days from the initiation of the proposed
stream and wetland impacts. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash,
debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional streams and
wetlands. Any excess excavated materials not utilized as back fill will be placed
and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent
erosion into adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Stockpiling of
excavated material within jurisdictional streams and wetlands will be strictly
prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project construction
activities initiated within jurisdictional streams and wetlands will be carried to
completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance
within the jurisdictional streams and wetlands.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all
phases of construction and installation as described in the Erosion Control Plan
sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and the Town
of Apex. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated
from high, non jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall install silt
fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, temporary coffer
dams, and tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install devices. All
erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and
operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than
once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all
measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will
be kept by the owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent
seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all
relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered
Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater
Rules.
MITIGATION:
The Hasse Avenue project proposes a total 0.005 acres of wetland impact and a total
of 462 linear feet stream impact associated with Phases 1, 2, and 3. Phase 1 of Hasse
Avenue is proposed to be constructed first, while Phases 2 and 3 are proposed to be
constructed later. The applicant proposes to compensate for proposed stream and
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 8 of 9
wetland impacts associated with Phase 1 only as a part of this application
submission. The applicant proposes a 2:1 mitigation ratio for perennial stream
impacts (Stream A - Reedy Branch) associated with Phase 1 - Crossing 1 of Hasse
Avenue. Future compensatory mitigation requirements associated with Phases 2
and 3 (Crossings 2 and 3) will be determined later as the project progresses.
For Hasse Avenue Phase 1 (Crossing 1), there are a total of total 178 if of
perennial stream impacts, of which, 81 if will be associated with a riprap
dissipator pad, 28 if will be temporary stream impact associated with the
construction of a coffer dam and diversion channel, and 691f will be permanent
stream impact associated with a culvert installation. McAdams has requested
234 if of stream mitigation credits, of which 138 if of credits will be required
to compensate for the 69 linear feet of permanent perennial stream impact
associated with Stream A (Reedy Branch — Crossing 1). McAdams has
requested 0.01 acres of wetland mitigation credits; however, there are no
wetland impacts associated with Crossing 1, thus wetland mitigation is not
required for Crossing 1. The attached letter from DMS dated July 5, 2017
demonstrates acceptance by DMS of payment for the necessary SMUs and
WMUs to satisfy the proposed project compensatory mitigation obligations.
Credits requested beyond what is required as mitigation for Crossing 1 impacts
will be used later for impacts associated with Crossings 2 and 3.
SUMMARY:
The extension of Hasse Avenue from the existing Sweetwater Residential
Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road will provide continuous vehicular traffic
from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road and alleviate existing traffic
demands within this section of western Wake County. The Hasse Avenue
Extension consists of (3) three phases. Phase 1 is proposed to be constructed
first, while Phases 2 and 3 are proposed to be constructed later. Since Phase 1
of Hasse Avenue is proposed to be constructed first, the applicant proposes to
compensate for proposed stream and wetland impacts associated with Phase 1
now as a part of this application submission. There will be a total of 69 linear
feet of permanent stream impact associated with a culvert installation for Phase
1 of Hasse Avenue at Crossing 1. Therefore, 138 linear feet of stream mitigation
has been requested to compensate for 69 linear feet of permanent perennial stream
impact associated with Stream A (Reedy Branch — Crossing 1). There are no
wetland impacts associated with Crossing 1. The attached July 5, 2017 letter from
DMS demonstrates acceptance by DMS of payment for the necessary SMUs to
satisfy the proposed project compensatory mitigation obligations.
CRS -16000

'J McADAMS
Ms. Karen Higgins
Pre -Construction Notification — GC 4088
Hasse Avenue Extension
November 21, 2017
Page 9 of 9
At this time, we are requesting approval that the proposed construction
activities associated with the Hasse Avenue Extension are authorized under GC
4088. Consideration of this project is greatly appreciated. If you should have
any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
Ke lyRot
Environmental Consultant
Attachments: Listed above
CRS -16000

44
AMS
. ..A .
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled In
Annlicant Information:
Street Address:
73 Hunter Street
Applicant name:
Town of Apex
Applicant address:
PO Box 250, Apex, NC 27502
Phone:
919-249-3301
Email:
[e-mail]
Proiect Information:
-- a
Project Name/Description:
Hasse Avenue road extension
Project Location:
The project corridor extends from the existing Sweetwater
Residential Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road in Apex, NC.
(Wake County PINS: 0722421400, 0722418856, & 0722411102)
Project Number:
CRS -16000
Project Manager:
Ryan Akers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, applicant for the above noted project, do hereby authorize Kevin Yates and Kelly Roth
of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act on behalf of the Town of Apex in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company,
Inc. staff.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date Date
Raleigh-Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 3436 Toringdon Way, Suite 110
Durham, North Carolina 27713 Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone] [phone]
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

r
o
o
f.r
gar .. =•
• � r
_ Issued Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination USACE Action Id: 44
r E SAW -2016-01993; 11/23/2016
HASSE AVENUE
,5 STUDY AREA Ilk
• 5
n ts.
r
STREAM
1i FEATURE A I '
aC r
r
I t
1 s
CTC
rB_ C rf3
GS; SOIL SURVEY SHEET 65, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1 �.71L�fL'�II�■��L[■ll�;llUL'3�>,�JI
N HASSE AVENUE EXTENSION
PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION "
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
0 250 500 1,000
Feet PROJECT #: CRS -16000 WADAMS
>>„�n=soofeet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA

RPW Perennial Stream A
(Reedy Branch) +/- 2782 LF
Issued Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination USACE Action Id:
SAW -2016-01993; 11/23/2016
Wetland C
+/- 0.17 AC
RPW Intermittent 1
Stream B1 1`
+/-1096 LF
HASSE AVENUE
STUDY AREA
+/- 3.0 AC; 2,250 LF
•
RPW Intermittent i
Stream A
+/-139 LF ;
r
Wetland F
+/- 0.76 AC
RPW Intermittent
Stream I
+/-1819 LF
Wetland D WOUS Pond D
+/- 0.08 AC +/- 0.59 AC
Wetland B
+/- 0.15 AC
Wetland A
+/- 0.03 AC Issued Approved Jurisdictional
Determination USACE Action Id:
SAW -2016-01993; 11/23/2016
+/-1.12 AC
r
0
Pond In High Ground °°o1
1 Pond B ti
+/- 0.33 AC
WOUS Pond A
+/- 3.06 AC
Legend
HASSE AVENUE STUDY AREA; Total +/- 3.0 AC; 2,250 LF
USACE Action Id: SAW -2016-01993
RPW Perennial Stream
-- RPW Intermittent Stream
Wetlands
Notes
1)Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030020609)
B. Everett Jordan Lake - New Hope River
2) DWR Stream Index #: Reedy Branch 16-41-10-1
Stream Classification: WS -IV; NSW
's.
N Date: HASSE AVENUE EXTENSION "
5/30/2017 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
0 150 300 600 FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Feet PROJECT #: CRS -16000 MCADAMS
1 inch = 300 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-01993 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -NEW HILL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Larry Gardner
Address: 1632 Pricewood Lane
Apex, NC 27502
Telephone Number: 919-389-7593
Size (acres) 1.12 Nearest Town Apex
Nearest Waterway Reedy Branch River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates Latitude: 35.7335436516623
Longitude: -78.9138638656715
Location description: Theyraiect area for this determination is approximately 1.12 acres located within a 16.97 acre
parcel identified by PIN 0722515118, as shown on the attached map entitled "Pricewood Lane Assemblase-
Stream/wetland delineation exhibit" dated 912212016.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RNA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ I344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed rive years from the date of this notification.
Page 1 of 2

SAW -2016-01993
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years,
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastinaer at
919-554-4884 x32 or James.C.Lastinaer(ir usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Pond B was determined to be a non -jurisdictional pond due entirely within
uplands.
D. Remarks: This determination only ai2l2lied to the 1.12 acre promect area as shown on the attached map described
above.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

saw-2016-01993
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by January 23, 2016.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** LASTINGERJAMES.C.13 DN11a1U519nU5Gby LASTMGERJAMEES.C.136342400tIXD
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: November 23 2016
2021
.c- ,o- .. —nmen .ou- ,ou-
b3642400 ou=USA, cn=05TINGER 7AMES.C.1363642400
Gale: 2016.11.2311:36:04 -05'00'
Expiration Date: November 23,
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmgpu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Pp=136:4:0.
Copy Furnished:
The John R. McAdams Company
Attn: George Buchholz
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: November 23, 2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: The John R. McAdams Company, Att: George
Buchholz, 2905 Meridian, Parkway, Durham, NC 27713
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: CESAW-RG-R, Pricewood Assemblage, SAW -2016-01993
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project iste is approximately 86 acres
located adjacent to Pricewood Lane, Rear the town of Apex, Wake County North Carolina, and is identified by PINS
0722418856, 0722515118, 0722525514, 0722621723, 0722528011, 0722519556, and 0722612127. Size and location of
aquatic features included with this determination can be found on the attached inventory table and delineation map
entitled "Pricewood Lane Assemblage-Stream/wetland delineation exhibit" dated 9/22/2016.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Apex
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.7331' Long.: -78.9140°
Universal Transverse Mercator,
Name of nearest waterbody: Reedy Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): September 22, 2016
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
Wetland A
35.7323
-78.9171
0.03 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland B
35.7330
-78.9174
0.17 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland C
35.7339
-78.9178
4.17 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland D
35.7345
-78.9163
0.07 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland E
35.7333
-78.9120
0.18 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland F
35.7353
-78.91.41
0.76 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland G
35.7364
-78.9121
0.05 acre
wetland
Section 404

Wetland H
35.7367
-78.9130
0.27 acre
wetland
Section 404
Wetland Z
35.7296
-78.9120
0.001 acre
wetland
Section 404
Stream A
35.7350
-78.9162
2,728 linear feet
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Stream Bl
35.7296
-78.9122
60 linear feet
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Stream B
35.7319
-78.9169
1,096 linear feet
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Stream F
35.7337
-78.9127
44 linear feet
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Stream 1
35.7328
-78.9111
1,819 linear feet
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Pond A
35.7308
-78.9147
3.06 acres
non-wetland
Section 404
waters
Pond C
35.7345
-78.9158
0.59 acres
non-wetland
Section 404
waters

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. if, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "maybe" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "maybe"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies al I aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: The John R. McAdams Company
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data,
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: New Hill quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County, 1970, sheet 55
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date): undated
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s), File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): _NC DEQ stream id_ form
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional
determinations.
DlgllallySEgnedhyLRSTINGLPJgAIEg.C.1353WZ400
LASTINGERJAME
DN: -U �u.5. Government,ou=OOD, au=Pq,
S.C.1363642400 ou=O2A cn11.231 NG1:30-O9.C.1363fi43900
Date, ]016.15.2311:38�30.OS'07
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) t
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

SAW -2016-01993
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Larry Gardner
The John R. McAdams Company
Attn: Georgie Buchholz
File Number: SAW -2016-01993
hate: November 23, 2016
Attached is:
See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL
C
01 APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
NJ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at htt ://www.usace.arm .mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ulato Pro ramandPermits.asx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT. If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section lI of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW -2016-01993
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION lI - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-PDO
Attn: James Lastinger, Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
919-554-4884 ext 32
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the ovivortuni to participate in all site investiations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, James Lastinger,
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Legend
SUBJECT PROPERTY TOTAL +1- 86 AC
-z
RPW Perennial Stream; Total +1- 2782 LF
---- RPW Intermittent Stream; Total +1- 2959 LF Wetland H
Wetlands; Total +1- 1.7 AC - +1- 0.27 BL
AC
O DATA POINT.L
a '
RPW Perennial Stream A
(Reedy Branch) +1- 2782 LF
wetland G
+�- 0.05 AC
Wetland D
+1- 0.07 AC
w
_
Wetland F ,
+1- 0.76 AC
`
RPW Intermittent
Stream I
WOUS Pond D
+1- 1 1819 LF Wetland E
Wetland C ; y:- +1- 0.59 AC
+1- 0.18 AC`
+1-0.17 AC
._
FDP2
Wetland B
+1- 0.17 AC
RPW Intermittent
Stream 137
RPW Intermittent
+1-1096 LF
'0�,Stream F
Ftp +1- 44 LF
0
Wetland A
+1- 0.03 AC
Pond In High Ground
Pond B
+1- 0.33 AC
Subject Property Evaluated
For Approved Jurisdictional -
Determination +1-1.12 AC;
See Approved JD r
. ..... Wetland Z
+1- 0.001 AC
WOUS Pond A -"f
—
+1- 3.06 AC
li
..... RPW Intermittent Stream B
, +1- 60 LF
Notes
1) USACE Field Confirmation Conducted 9!22116
2) Total Subject Property +1- 86 AC;
Subject Property Evaluated For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination +1- 84.88 AC Subject Property Evaluated
Subject Property Evaluated For Approved Jurisdictional Determination +1-1.12 AC For Preliminary Jurisdictional
3)Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030020609)
B. Everett Jordan Lake - New Hope River
Determination +1- 84.88 AC;
4) DWR Stream Index #: Reedy Branch 16-41-10-1
See Preliminary JD _
Stream Classification: WS -IV; NSW
D
_ s GeograP}h�e
tY
Getpping, rogrid. �,N, IGP, swi s opo, and�the 1= s *•
_ . _. a �-
N Date: PRICEWOOD LANE ASSEMBLAGE "
9/22/2016 STREAMMIETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 15060Feet PROJECT #: CRS -16000 MCADAMS
1 inchh = 3 0o feet APEX NORTH CAROLINA

United
States Department
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
September 16, 2016
George Buchholz
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
i,.
Re: P ricewood I.aile rilssornblage — WaKne COLiiity, NC
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
• ,.„., � consultation with the
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining, vvuctiier additional consu .
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern” refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosioncontrol
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
01

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
0
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
April 6, 2017
George Buchholz
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Potential Development, Pricewood Lane Assemblage, 1632 Pricewood Lane, Apex, CRS -16000,
Wake County, ER 17-0481
Dear Mr. Buchholz:
Thank you for your letter of March 9, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�L� aoLa-ta&�-
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

November 1, 2016
George Buchholz
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination
Pricewood Lane Assemblage
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. Buchholz,
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Apex 16 -
On October 31, 2016, 1 met with you at the subject site to evaluate pond B and determine if it was subject
to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules. Based on the information obtained during the site visit
and per the requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO),
I concur with the riparian buffers as shown on the attached map titled "Stream/Wetland Delineation &
Buffer Exhibit, Figure 3. Existing Conditions" dated 9/22/16.
Drainage
Shown as on
Shown as on
Determined
Feature
USGS
Soil Survey
Determination made in the field
Buffer Width
Pond B
Present
Not Present
Not Part of a Natural Drainage Way
0 feet
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or Delegated Local
Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the DWQ Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian McMillan, DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Otherwise the appeal procedure
will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative hearing. You
must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this
notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send
the original and one (1) copy of the petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural
Resources, c/o Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1601.

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination (Apex 16-010)
Page 2 of 2
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within
sixty (60) days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Stormwater & Utility Engineering Manager
Attachments
TOWN OF APEX
The Peak of Good Living
PO $ox 25o Apex, NC 27502 1 [phone] 1 www.apexnc.org

-r s

' PROJECT AREA STREAM
_ FEATURE H -
f - L (OFF SITE)
STREAM
STREAM FEATURE A
FEATURE E ,
r
~_ r
CZ
STREAM: ;
FEATURE D1p
sem!
AfAYS
�r STREAM
• ' r 3 .t �"' ' FEATURE F
Au CrC2 STREAM
FEATURE I
AfA (OFF SITE)
CrB2
STREAM r
FEATURE B f
z
C rC
4
F �• �� �nf � � S` � y. �
CrC a i
d
PONDct
F a
EATURE A
crc
STREAM
Wscz FEATURE G
USGS• SOIL SURVEY SHEET 65 WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 35.733150 N, LONG: -78,914004 W
N PRICEWOOD LANE ASSEMBLAGE
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATION "
0 250 goo 1,000
FIGURE 2. SOIL SURVEY EXHIBIT
eet PROJECT #: CRS -16000 McADAMS
l inch = 500 t'ect 1 APEX, NORTH CAROLINA

Legend
SUBJECT PROPERTY TOTAL +1- 86 AC
— RPW Perennial Stream; Total +1- 2782 LF
— RPW Intermittent Stream; Total +1- 2959 LF
Town Of Apex Riparian Buffers
® Wetlands; Total +1- 1.7 AG
DATA POINT
RPW Perennial Stream A
(Reedy Branch) +1- 2782 LF
100 FT
Stream Buffer
T'
!1!uda;nd H
AC
Wetiand G
+1- 0.08 AC
RPW Intermittent r
Stream B1
RPW Intermittal�t
Watland D
Stream F
+1- 0.07 AC
+I- 0.03 AC
50 FT
50 Fr
Pond In High Ground
'•�
Stream Buffer
+1- 0.33 AC
t
Wetland F •-~
-
Subject Property Evaluated
50 FT
+1- 0.76 AC t ' •�
Stream Buffer
Determination +1-1.12 AC;
See Approved JD
-+«
RPW Intermittent
Stream I
Ii
'
1
`
WOUS Pond D
+A 1819 LF
��\ Wetland E
Wetland C
a d +1- 9.06 AC
+1- 0.59 AC
+1- 0.18 AC
+1- 0.17 AC
RPW Intermittent Stream B
r
+1- 60 LF
Notes
1) USACE Field Confirmation Conducted 9122116; USACE Action Id.: SAW -2416,01993
- -
oP2
Subject Property Evaluated
-
60 FT
For Preliminary Jurisdictional
Wetland B
Determination +1- 84.88 AC;
Stream Buffer
B- Everett Jordan Lake - New Hope River
See Preliminary JD
+1- 0.17 AC
4j DWR Stream Index #: Reedy Branch 16-41-10-1
Stream Classification: WS -IV; NSW9p
SGµ
voce.
tri Digilino e € €a 5 eoyra
-- t
�n' e - ri E€, GP swiss opv-a
RPW Intermittent r
Stream B1
RPW Intermittal�t
_
+1-1096 LF 1 �,.
Stream F
+I- 0.03 AC
50 FT
Pond Buffer
Pond In High Ground
Pond B
+1- 0.33 AC
t
-
Subject Property Evaluated
50 FT
For Approved Jurisdictional
Stream Buffer
Determination +1-1.12 AC;
See Approved JD
-+«
Wetland Z
l
+1- 0.401 AC
WOOS Pond A
a d +1- 9.06 AC
=a
RPW Intermittent Stream B
r
+1- 60 LF
Notes
1) USACE Field Confirmation Conducted 9122116; USACE Action Id.: SAW -2416,01993
- -
2) Total Subject Property +1.86 AC;
Subject Property Evaluated
Subject Property Evaluated For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination +1� 84.88 AC
Subject Property Evaluated For Approved Jurisdictional Determination +f- 1.12 AC
For Preliminary Jurisdictional
3jCape Fear River Basin (HUC 03030020609)
Determination +1- 84.88 AC;
B- Everett Jordan Lake - New Hope River
See Preliminary JD
4j DWR Stream Index #: Reedy Branch 16-41-10-1
Stream Classification: WS -IV; NSW9p
SGµ
voce.
tri Digilino e € €a 5 eoyra
-- t
�n' e - ri E€, GP swiss opv-a
Data: PRICEWOOD LANE ASSEMBLAGE
9!221x016 STREAMMETLAND DELINEATION & BUFFER EXHIBIT
0 150 300 600 FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Feet PROJECT #: CRS -16000 M C Q DA M S
1 inch = 100 feet APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
tO

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Fe a'Ld
Date:
Project/Site". 1 /i C Ltd
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle o
Other ;04
Stream is at least intermittent ,
Ephemeral Intermittentenni
e.g. Quad Name
if >_ 19 or perennial if? 30"
2
1
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 7iii )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
;

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date:G�/�1-2 Project/Site: P�l�ea/pa / - Latitude: 3S-7�J��1111
Evaluator:
County: 04
Longitude. --7&-1
Total Points:
Stream Determ'nation (circle one)
Other vk1l
Stream is at least intermittent -7
Z'
Ephemeral t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2 3
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1a
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex_ riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
No = 0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
05
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
rol
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
10
1
3
8. Headcuts
01
FACW = 0.75;
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
=C3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see disco ons in manual
B. Hvdroioav (Subtotal = I )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
T
2 3
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1 0.5
42 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
° 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Biolo (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
rol
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
.71
Date:
ProjectlSite: 11,P,41w�s -
f3S
Latitude:
1,73
Evaluator:
County: ��
Longitude: -,c5- P71
Total Points:
Stream DeterXnt�ion (circle one)
OtherStream
is at least intermittentEphemeral
Inient Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if ? 19 or perennial if 2 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal =_ )
Absent
Weak
I Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel beck'and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along 'thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffl�_ pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence %.
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substral:e
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
S. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
-,,-Second or greater order channel
dr= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in rr*nual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Basefiow
�r0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris' `
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? •
0.5 1
No = 0
Yes = 3
24. Amphibians
C. Bioloav (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
/ 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streamb d
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity apd
abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks /
0
1
2
3
22, Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0,5
1
1.5
25. Algae /
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants,�n streambed
CW
= 0.75, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams repay also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectlSite: pl)lU -
Latitude: �3 y
i
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream De ermin on (circle fine)
Other j
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral rmittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or erennialif>_ 30�
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence.._
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
k I 1�
Sit F��va"�
Date:
ProjectlSite: r"M e
Latitude: a. a
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: - 7t ,7
F�
Total Points:
Stream Det rmina ' (circle one)
Other lJf�j f
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral I itient Perennial
e.g. Quad !Name: iT I(
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30
2
3
1
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
V
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H droio Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Bioloav [Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
V

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 <_h'?A1 M F,0a+AAJ
Date:
Project/Site: P("&1
Latitude: -
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent f
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ra'�O_
3
Ephemeral t Perennial
e.g. Quad
if? 19 or Perennial if? 30* t
2
3
A. Geomor holo {Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1.5 0.5
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
&1
Sketch:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
n artificial ditches are not rated; see discu$ions in manual
B Hvdroloov (Subtotal = r19 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes
0.5
r Rinlnnv (Stihtotai = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23, Crayfish 0
1
1.5
24, Amphibians 0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

0
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 57 x4, kPAw. CP111 qclll 14
Date:
Project/Site! +
54 CL
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: -,
Total Points:
Stream Dete enation (circle one)
Other J' /S//
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera€ ittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if a 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Sketch:
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf fitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
24, Amphibians
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2 3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1 1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 1.5
24, Amphibians
0 1
0.5
1 1 1.5
25_ Algae
0
0.5 1
1 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; DBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
�i

NC DWO Stream identification Form Version 4.11 F-e&ht u
Date:
ProjecttSite:
Latitude: f
Evaluator:
County:
W4 L
Longitude:
Total Points:'
Stream is at least intermittent �
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
3
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g.Quad'Name.
if ? 19 or erennial if ? 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri ie- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Sketch:�Ai
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
C. Bioloov (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23, Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:�Ai
.aj J

NO DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.111
FTo
i74P9
Date:
Project/Site'. �'i "-4
Latitude:
Evaluator: !
Count Y=
Longitude: •....
9
91' '
�"
3
,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
�;
Other ��,. �
intermittent
Stream is atleastintermritent
a
Stream
Ephemeral t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
or perennial i 30Y
0
0.5
A. Geomorphology(Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1.5 0.5
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
ay,
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes =
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = r� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 �.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes =
0.5
C. Biology(Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
'•
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

❑��� W A rER.
r r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
F'age 'I of 1 U
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
X Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1 b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 4088
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
X Yes
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for
DWQ 401 Certification:
X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
X Yes
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
X No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
Hasse Avenue Extension
2b
County:
Wake
2c
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d
Subdivision name:
Linden Subdivision
2e
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Judy H Hackney
3b
Deed Book and Page No.
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d
Street address:
2505 Olive Chapel Road
3e
City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27502
3f
Telephone no.:
3g
Fax no.:
3h
Email address:
F'age 'I of 1 U
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a Applicant is:
4b Name:
Town of Apex
4c Business name
(if applicable):
4d Street address:
73 Hunter Street
P.O. Box 250
4e City, state, zip:
Apex, NC 27502
4f Telephone no.:
919-249-3400
4g Fax no.:
4h Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name:
Kelly Roth, Environmental Consultant
5b Business name
(if applicable):
The John R. McAdams Company
5c Street address:
2905 Meridian Parkway
5d City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27713
5e Telephone no.:
919-361-5000
5f Fax no.:
919-361-2269
5g Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0722411102
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.729384 Longitude: -78.917476
1c
Property size:
+/- 3.0 acres; 1,500 LF
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reedy Branch
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c
River basin:
Cape Fear (HUC 030300020609)
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: The project area for the proposed Hasse Avenue extends from an existing residential
subdivision (Sweetwater Residential Subdivision) located to the north, crosses Reedy Branch, enters the
northwestern portion of the proposed Linden development, and extends southwest beyond the proposed
Linden development to Olive Chapel Road. Future extension of Hasse Avenue is included on the Town of
Apex Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector Street Plan; therefore, the future alignment crosses
the property located at 2505 Olive Chapel Road (Wake County PIN # 0722411102) and intersects with
Olive Chapel Road. There are three stream features (Stream Feature A [Reedy Branch], Stream Feature
B1, and Stream Feature AA) and two wetland features (Wetland D and Wetland B) along the proposed
Hasse Avenue alignment. See attached Figure 3 (Existing Conditions) for the location of these features.
Sections of Hasse Avenue located within the proposed Linden Subdivision have already received a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (see attached USACE Action Id. SAW -2016-01993; issued
November 23, 2016). A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) is needed for the future alignment
of Hasse Avenue where it crosses the property located at 2505 Olive Chapel Road (Wake County PIN #
0722411102). The study area of Hasse Avenue that requires a PJD consists primarily of pasture fields,
small forested areas, and stream feature AA. There is a 100 -year floodplain and floodway associated with
Reedy Branch (NC FIRM Map 3720072200J; effective date May 2, 2006). A Conditional Letter of Map
Revision (CLOMR) was submitted to the Town of Apex and the to the state on May 3, 2017. Based on
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice, the
proposed encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the
occurrence of the base flood discharge, and the requirements set forth in the Town of Apex regulations
will be met. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a letter on September 16, 2016 (see
attached) stating that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered
or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing
under the Endangered Species Act. Therefore, the USFWS believes the requirements under Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled. The North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural
Resources — State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) issued a letter on April 6, 2017 (see attached)
stating that SHPO is aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project, and, therefore,
have no comment on the project.
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.231 AC (10,018.8 SF)
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4,023 LF
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the project is to construct a secondary arterial roadway
alignment from the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road that will provide continuous vehicular
traffic from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road in the western section of Wake County, North Carolina, which is
experiencing increased traffic demands.

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The western section of Wake County, North Carolina is experiencing increased traffic demands along U.S. Highway 64 (located
o the north), Olive Chapel Road (located to the south), Kelly Road (located to the east), and New Hill Road (located to the west).
The extension of Hasse Avenue from the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision to Olive Chapel Road will provide
continuous vehicular traffic from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road and alleviate existing traffic demands within this section
of western Wake County. Hasse Avenue is proposed to extend from the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision located to
he north, cross Reedy Branch, enter the northwestern portion of the proposed Linden development, and extend beyond the
proposed Linden development to the southwest to intersect with Olive Chapel Road. Future extension of Hasse Avenue is located
on the Town of Apex Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector Street Plan (see Figure 4 — Overall Site Plan).
The Hasse Avenue Extension project consists of three (3) phases. Phase 1 is proposed to be constructed first, and Phases 2 and
3 are proposed to be constructed later. Phase 1 proposes to extend Hasse Avenue from the existing Sweetwater Residential
Subdivision, cross Reedy Branch, and enter the northwestern section of the proposed Linden development. As a result, there are
stream impacts (Stream Feature A [Reedy Branch]) associated with Phase 1. The future alignment of Phases 2 and 3 proposes
o extend Hasse Avenue beyond the proposed Linden development through the property located at 2505 Olive Chapel Road
(Wake County PIN # 0722411102) and intersect with Olive Chapel Road. Phases 2 and 3 propose to impact two intermittent
stream features (Stream Features B1 and AA) and one wetland feature (Wetland B).
For the construction of Phase 1 of the Hasse Avenue Extension, traditional equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders,
bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
X Yes
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/ project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what
X Preliminary & Approved
type of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company:
areas? Name (if known): George Buchholz
McAdams Co.
(formerly of McAdams Co.)
Other:
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Mr. James
Lastinger (USACE representative) attended an on-site field concurrence meeting on January 28, 2016 and confirmed the
wetland/stream delineation. A Preliminary Determination and Approved Determination was issued on November 23, 2016
(USACE SAW -2016-01993). In addition, the Town of Apex issued a Stream Buffer Determination (Town of Apex # 16-010;
Primary Watershed — Jordan Lake Watershed) on November 1, 2016.
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained
X No
for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
X Yes No
6b If yes, explain. The Hasse Avenue project consists of three phases. Phase 1 of Hasse Avenue is proposed to be
constructed first, while Phases 2 and 3 are proposed to be constructed later. Phase 1 proposes to extend from the existing
Sweetwater Residential Subdivision, cross Reedy Branch, and enter the northwestern section of the proposed Linden
development. As a result, there will be stream impacts associated with Phase 1. The future alignments of Phases 2 and 3, as
currently proposed, extend beyond the proposed Linden development through the property located at 2505 Olive Chapel Road
(Wake County PIN # 0722411102) and intersect with Olive Chapel Road. Phases 2 and 3 propose to impact two intermittent
features (Stream Features B1 and AA) and a wetland feature (Wetland B).
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X Wetlands X Streams — tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
Wetland B —
Fill
Headwater Wetland; PFO
Yes
Corps
0.005
Crossing 2; P
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.005
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3J.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(Iinear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
Stream A —
Crossing 1;
Coffer Dam &
Reedy Branch
Perennial
Corps
20 FT
28
Temporary
Diversion Channel
(Stream Feature A)
Stream A —
Reedy Branch
Crossing 1;
Culvert
(Stream Feature A)
Perennial
Corps
20 FT
69
Permanent
Stream A —
Reedy Branch
Crossing 1;
Riprap Dissipator Pad
(Stream Feature A)
Perennial
Corps
20 FT
81
Permanent
Stream B1 —
Coffer Dam &
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 2;
Diversion Channel
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
27
Temporary
(Stream Feature 131)
Stream 131 —
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 2;
Culvert
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
93
Permanent
(Stream Feature 131)
Stream 131 —
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 2;
Riprap Dissipator Pad
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
25
Permanent
(Stream Feature 131)
Stream AA —
Coffer Dam &
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 3;
Diversion Channel
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
27
Temporary
(Stream Feature AA)
Stream AA —
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 3;
Culvert
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
91
Permanent
(Stream Feature AA)
Stream AA —
unnamed tributary to
Crossing 3;
Riprap Dissipator Pad
Reedy Branch
Intermittent
Corps
2 FT
21
Permanent
(Stream Feature AA)
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
462

3i. Comments: See Crossings 1, 2, and 3 (Plan, Profile, and Cross -Sections). It should be noted that of the total 462 If of strearr
impacts associated with all three crossings, 127 If will be associated with riprap dissipator pads, which will be installed flush with
the existing grade of the stream bed to allow for aquatic life passage. In addition, there will be another 82 If of temporary strearr
impact associated with the construction of coffer dams and diversion channels for all three crossings. Therefore, there will be a
total of 380 If of permanent stream impact associated with three (3) culvert installations for all three (3) crossings. For Phase 1,
at Crossing 1, there are a total of total 178 If of stream impacts, of which 81 If will be associated with a riprap dissipator pad, 28
If will be temporary stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and diversion channel, and 69 If will be
permanent stream impact associated with a culvert installation. There are no wetland impacts associated with Phase 1 at Crossinc
1. For Phase 2 of Hasse Avenue at Crossing 2, there are a total of total 145 If of stream impacts, of which 25 If will be associated
with a riprap dissipator pad, 27 If will be temporary stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and diversion
channel, and 93 If will be permanent stream impact associated with a culvert installation. In addition, there are 0.005 acres of
wetland impact (Wetland B) associated with Phase 2 of Hasse Avenue at Crossing 2. For Phase 3 of Hasse Avenue at Crossing
3, there are a total of total 139 If of stream impacts, of which 21 If will be associated with a riprap dissipator pad, 27 If will be
temporary stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and diversion channel, and 91 If will be permanent
stream impact associated with a culvert installation. There are no wetland impacts proposed for Phase 3 of Hasse Avenue al
Crossing 3.
Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water
of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5gComments: There are two (2) existing ponds within the project area (Pond A [3.06 ac] and Pond D [0.07 ac]). The proposed
project will not be impact these two (2) existing ponds.
5hls a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j Size of pond watershed (acres):
5kMethod of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitic ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impac
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
131
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project was designed to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands. Due to increased traffic demands along U.S.
Highway 64 (located to the north), Olive Chapel Road (located to the south), Kelly Road (located to the east), and New Hill Road
(located to the west), a north -to -south secondary arterial roadway alignment is required to have continuous vehicular traffic flow.
To provide a north -to -south secondary arterial roadway, The Town of Apex Transportation Plan Thoroughfare and Collector Street
Plan prescribes the alignment of Hasse Avenue from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road. As a result, the alignment of Hasse
Avenue from U.S. Highway 64 was incorporated into the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision. To continue the extension
of Hasse Avenue through the proposed Linden development (located south of the Sweetwater Residential Subdivision) and
terminate at Olive Chapel Road, the alignment for Hasse Avenue must cross Reedy Branch at the proposed location (see Crossing
1; Phase 1) and extend into the property located at 2505 Olive Chapel Road (see Crossings 2 & 3; Phases 2 & 3).
For Hasse Avenue Phase 1 (Crossing 1), various alternatives were examined with consideration of the following: a) existing traffic
demands along U.S. Highway 64, Olive Chapel Road, Kelly Road, and New Hill Road; b) access to the proposed Linden
development and the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision; c) emergency vehicular access to the proposed Linden
development; and d) a no build option. Not building the extension of Hasse Avenue to terminate at Olive Chapel Road was
determined not to be a viable option since this would not alleviate traffic demands along U.S. Highway 64, Olive Chapel Road,
Kelly Road, and New Hill Road. The extension of Hasse Avenue would provide additional emergency vehicular access to the
proposed Linden development, and provide a north -to -south connection between U.S. Highway 64 and Olive Chapel Road,
hereby alleviating traffic along U.S. Highway 64, Olive Chapel Road, Kelly Road, and New Hill Road. Due to the alignment
configuration of Hasse Avenue through the existing Sweetwater Residential Subdivision, the crossing of Reedy Branch by Hasse
Avenue is limited to only one location that takes into account geometric configuration design, construction constraints, and safe
vehicular passage. The alignment of future Phases 2 & 3 of Hasse Avenue will be directed along a route which proposes to impact
he least jurisdictional streams and wetlands located on the property at 2505 Olive Chapel Road so that a terminus connection to
Olive Chapel Road could be achieved. Additionally, each road crossing alignment (Crossings 1, 2, and 3) has been designed to
he minimum size necessary to promote safe vehicular passage.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Road
crossings and culvert impacts at stream features (Stream Feature A [Reedy Branch], Stream Feature B1, and Stream Feature
AA) have been minimized to the maximum extent practicable and have been aligned to cross streams as close to 90 degrees
as possible. Dissipator pads associated with each culvert will be installed flush with the existing grade of the stream bed to allow
for aquatic life passage. There will be minimal temporary impacts associated with coffer dams and diversion channels, which will
be used to conduct the proposed work within dry conditions. The use of the temporary coffer dams and diversion channels will
be less than 90 days from the initiation of the proposed stream and wetland impacts. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar,
trash, debris and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Any excess excavated materials
not utilized as back fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent erosion into
adjacent jurisdictional streams and wetlands. Stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional streams and wetlands will be
strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project construction activities initiated within jurisdictional streams
and wetlands will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance within the jurisdictional
streams and wetlands. Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and the
Town of Apex. All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground.
The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, diversion ditches, temporary coffer dams, and tree
protection, clearing only as necessary to install devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability
and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be
made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the
owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project
will meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined
through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
X Yes
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
X Corps

Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for
X Payment to in-lieu fee program
this project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type:
Quantity:
Type:
Quantity:
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Quantity:
Type:
Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
YES
4b Stream mitigation requested:
234 LF requested (138 LF needed for Crossing 1)
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.01 acres (No mitigation needed for Crossing 1)
4f Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
Comments: The Hasse Avenue project proposes a total 0.005 acres of wetland impact and a total of 462 linear feet stream impact
associated with Phases 1, 2, and 3. Phase 1 of Hasse Avenue is proposed to be constructed first, while Phases 2 and 3 are
proposed to be constructed later. The applicant proposes to compensate for proposed stream and wetland impacts associated
with Phase 1 only as a part of this application submission. The applicant proposes a 2:1 mitigation ratio for perennial stream
impacts (Stream A - Reedy Branch) associated with Phase 1 - Crossing 1 of Hasse Avenue. Future compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with Phases 2 and 3 (Crossings 2 and 3) will be determined later as the project progresses.
For Hasse Avenue Phase 1 (Crossing 1), there are a total of total 178 If of perennial stream impacts, of which, 81 If will be
associated with a riprap dissipator pad, 28 If will be temporary stream impact associated with the construction of a coffer dam and
diversion channel, and 69 If will be permanent stream impact associated with a culvert installation. McAdams has requested 234
If of stream mitigation credits, of which 138 If of credits will be required to compensate for the 69 linear feet of permanent perennial
stream impact associated with Stream A (Reedy Branch — Crossing 1). McAdams has requested 0.01 acres of wetland mitigation
credits; however, there are no wetland impacts associated with Crossing 1, thus wetland mitigation is not required for Crossing 1.
The attached letter from DMS dated July 5, 2017 demonstrates acceptance by DMS of payment for the necessary SMUs and
MUs to satisfy the proposed project compensatory mitigation obligations. Credits requested beyond what is required as
mitigation for Crossing 1 impacts will be used later for impacts associated with Crossings 2 and 3.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
X No
requires buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
Yes X No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. The Town of Apex is a
delegated authority for NCDWR Stormwater Management Plans. The review and approval
of the SWMP is part of the Town of Apex review process.
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
32.70%
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
X Yes
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The
proposed stormwater management plan for the project will be designed to protect the downstream environment. The plan
incorporates stormwater management techniques to manage both water quantity and quality aspects of site runoff. Stormwater
management for the project will be accomplished by incorporating engineered stormwater best management practice facilities to
capture and treat the stormwater runoff from developed areas. The proposed development is located within the Cape Fear River
basin with all stormwater runoff draining into Reedy Branch, which is within the Jordan Lake Watershed. Per the Town of Apex
regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance standards for development
set forth in the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
jurisdiction
own of Apex
3a In which localgovernment's is thisproject?
Phase II
3b Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
X Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
been attached? A courtesy copy of the SW Management Plan will be
X No
provided upon approval.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
HQW
4a Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs
ORW
apply (check all that apply):
X Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
X No
been attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
X Yes
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
X Yes
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or
X No
the use of public (federal/state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by
the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final
approval letter.)
Yes No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
X No
Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2bls this an after -the -fact permit application?
X No
2clf you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result
X No
in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The proposed project satisfies the
need for a north -to -south secondary arterial roadway from U.S. Highway 64 to Olive Chapel Road.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated
from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The proposed project consists of a road, and
does not include utility service. No wastewater will be generated by the proposed project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species
X Yes
or habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
X Yes
Act impacts?
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh ES Field Office
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued on September 16, 2016 (see attached) a letter
stating that "based on the USFWS records and a review of information provided by McAdams, the proposed action is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical
habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Therefore, the USFWS believes
the requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled."
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? An interactive map
called the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/) was accessed on April
17, 2017 to determine if the project will impact Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant
in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The North
Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources — State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) issued on April 6,
2017 (see attached) a letter stating that "SHPO is aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project; and
therefore, have no comment on the project."
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
X Yes
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? The North Carolina Flood Insurance Rate Map
3720072200J (issued May 2, 2006) was reviewed and it was determined that there is a floodway and 100 -year floodplain area
associated with Reedy Branch. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) was submitted on May 3, 2017 to the locality and
state. Based on hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice, the proposed
encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood
discharge, and the requirements set forth in the Town of Apex regulations will be met.
Page 10 of 10

Kelly Roth
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
fpe\
Applica t/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
11/21/2017
Date

MItiQaiton Servkes
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
July 5, 2017
Creighton Call
Crescent Communities
227 W. Trade Street, Suite 1000,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Project: Hasse Avenue
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAIN
Secretat
Expiration of Acceptance: January 5, 2018
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
River CU Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
Basin (8 -digit HUC) I (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian-7—Coastal Marsh
Impact Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 234 0.01 0 1 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: George Buchholz, agent
Sincerely,
a es. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

I
SWEETWATER / STREAM
INTERMITTENT \ �f
1 RESIDENTIAL ` 1,849 LF.
DEVELOPMENT
WETLAND D /ire
TOTAL = 0.08 AC.
OR 3,484.8 SF.
RPW PEREWAL STREAM
TOTAL = 2,788 LF. \\ \fix \
.J /WETLAND F}+,�-/.
f p �� J
FLOODPLAIN -� r, --1 �1�� `~ .r,/ - = LIN
tf�15 -Ay' 9R i �Dk,'VE 0410
r HASSE AVENUE f -6,534 SF _ )
STUDY AREA
(60' STUDY AREA) / WETLAND- D.-
0.1� AC_OR, ' J
-6;534. SF-
RP,W IRlTERMITTENT 1I
jFREAM Ba 4/—
b96 LF 4
1✓
4T LAND R 'tl'- P. 03 /A6/��
WOUS POND A
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM AA I I +/ 3.62 AC
TOTAL = 159 LF.
i
I
NOTES
1. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN (HUC 03030020609)
B. EVERETT JORDAN LAKE — NEW HOPE RIVER.
2. DWR STREAM INDEX #: 16-14-10-1 (REEDY BRANCH) e I
STREAM CLAS&FICATION: WS—IV; NSW * �
3. JSACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ISSUED 11/23/16 ,
(USACE ACTION ID: SAW -2016-01993)
4. TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION ISSUED
11/01/16 (APEX 16-010)
LEGEND
PROJECT SITE _ + 3.0 ACRES oA�
RPW PERENNIAL STREAM A = ± 2,788 LF. �YEL
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM B1 = + 1,096 LF. (,� & 1
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM AA = + 139 LF. OZ'Iv 1
TOTAL STREAMS = ± 4,023 LF. BL GRAPHIC SCALE a
WETLAND B = 0.15 AC, OR 6,534 SF. 300 0 150 300 600
WETLAND D = 0.08 AC. OR 3.484.8 SF.
TOTAL WETLAND = 0.23 AC. OR 10,018.8 SF. PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 inch = 300 ft.
eron
FILENAME:
no. CRS -16000 HASSE OAD EXTENSION 11
L
� °I'.e"A]HE: CR5160DD—FIG3 AVE,• ��� JOHN IL � �
SCALE: PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION 2W5M-ldi— y
„ = 300FIGURE 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS ��5 North r•c,,,.ia„a 27713
1lcene� No.: C-0299
DATE: (8001793-5646•McA��'m.eom
03-24-2017 APEX, NORTH CAROLINA MCADAMS

UNNAMED ROAD
(CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
U.S. gIGI WAY 64
PUBLIC ROAD I60
' P,/,W)
/HASSE AVENUE r
STUDY AREA
(60' PUBLIC R/W) r
r
f s
� r
I
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM AA
TOTAL = 139 LF.
N OTES
1. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN (HUC 0303002060
B. EVERETT JORDAN LAKE — NEW HOPE RIVE
2. DWR STREAM INDEX #: 15-14-10-1 (REED`
STREAM CLASSIFICATION: WS ---IV; NSW
3. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ISSUE
(USACE ACTION ID: SAW -2016-01993)
4. TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETFRMINAT
11/01/16 (APEX 16-010)
IMPACTED LEGEND
PROJECT SITE = + 3.0 ACRES
RPW PERENNIAL STREAM A = + 279 LF.
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM AA = ± 139 LF.
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM B1 = + 145 LF.
TOTAL STREAMS = + 563 LF.
WETLAND B = 0.005 AC, OR 233 SF.
WETLAND D = 0.01 AC. OR 435.6 SF.
TOTAL WETLAND = 0.015 AC. OR 668.6 SF
SWEETWATER
RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
l
fG ISLAND
DRIVE
(PRIVATE
DRIVE)
2 v J
J� •�
� � f 1t�rr� ���� �j 1� r1 `
II1111// r� WOOD IDGE
RESIDENTIAL
�\\" A)EVELOPMEN.
J ��
. OL�y goy
�4�BLZC x
A
a
U
z
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1,000
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 inch = 500 ft.
PROJECT NO. CRS -16000 HASSE AVE ROAD EXTENSION 1
L
FILENAME:� Tjmj��� ���
CRS16000—FIG4
a PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION 29M Merkliam Parkway
SCALE:
1" „s
= 50°� FIGURE 4: PROPOSED IMPACTS - OVERALL SITE PLAN`'°LkensC-0293w
DAM03-24-2017APEX NORTH CAROLINA MCADAMs seoos��-.��a�=mom .�

NOTE:
THERE ARE NO WETLAND IMPACTS PROPOSED
UNDER THE CURRENT DESIGN FOR CROSSING 1
FLOODPLAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
= 69 LF.
10'x10' CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS
84" CMP PIPE
PERMANENT DISSIPATOR IMPACT
= 81 LF.
PROJECT SITE
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 14 LF.
OR 0 AC. OR 210 SF.
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
ZONE 3 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.21 AC.
OR 9,147.6 SF.
ZONE 2 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.15 AC.
OR 6,534 SF.
ZONE 1 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.3 AC.
OR 13,068 SF.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 14 LF. 1.
OR 0 AC. OR 210 SF. o
U
RPW PERENNIAL STREAM A TOTAL = 2,788 LF. I¢
WETLAND D TOTAL = 0.08 AC OR 3,484.8 SF
)TAL BUFFER IMPACTS
:RENNIAL STREAM A — IMPACTED STREAM BUFFER:
'_ONE 1 = 0.3 AC. OR 13,068 SF.
'_ONE 2 = 0.15 AC. OR 6,534 SF.
'_ONE 3 = 0.21 AC. OR 9.147.6 SF.
-OTAL BUFFER IMPACTS = 0.66 AC. OR 28,749.6 SF
f R EAM A IMPACTS:
REAM A — TEMP = 28 LF.
REAM A — PERM = 69 LF.
-REAM A — PERM DISSIPATOR = 81 LF.
)TAL STREAM IMPACTS = 178 LF.
00
O
tM�1
Vf
f� 1�
w0
u
O 5
Z -4O
Z06
0 OR
Z
O
�U
w a
)
fU
y i
O Z
0 1 o
O N
I 0 II
N ( N
of I
U O
U O
z
z
F �
a
J W
'J MCADAMS

14 LF. TEMPOI
STREAM IMP/
FINISHED GRADE
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
(80 LF. PIPE)
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
(80 LF) PIPE TO BE
BURIED 1 FT. TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE
PASSAGE
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
DOWNSTREAM INV. 254.98'
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
DOWNSTREAM STREAM
BOTTOM ELEV. 252.98'
DOWNSTREAM BURIED BOX
CULVERT INV. 251.98'
1 FT. THK RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD TO
BE INSTALLED FLUSH
WITH EXISTING GRADE
HASSE AVENUE NORTH — STREAM CROSSING
0+00
1+00
2+00
78 LF TOTALSREM
TEMPORARY
I PAT
I M PACT
266
264
150 F ER
ANE T IMPACT
RO
260
258
256
2ARY
CT
ISSI
AT R
ADS
250
)IA. CMP
14 LF.
STREA
248
255.62'
5
270
270
84"
PIPE
INV.
260
260
1o'X1c
UPSTF
BOTT(
UPSTF
INV. ,
TEMP(
I
DAM ,
CHANT
SHOW
EXIST
250
250
245
245
0+00
1+00
2+00
' BOX CULVERT
EAM STREAM
M ELEV. 253.62'
EAM BURIED BOX
52.62'
)RARY COFFER
SND DIVERSION
JEL (NOT
J)
NG GRADE
DOWNSTREAM
0+99
270
268
266
264
262
260
258
256
254
252
250
248 �T
50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
UPSTREAM
1+66
q
FINISHED GRADE
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
(67 LF. PIPE)
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
(80 LF) PIPE TO BE
BURIED 1 FT. TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE
PASSAGE
84" CMP PIPE
DOWNSTREAM INV. 254.98'
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
DOWNSTREAM STREAM
BOTTOM ELEV. 252.98'
DOWNSTREAM BURIED BOX
CULVERT INV. 251.98'
IyI�I[.y7I��Zel:7_U7�
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
(67 LF. PIPE)
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
(67 LF) PIPE TO BE
BURIED 1 FT. TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE
PASSAGE
84" CMP PIPE
UPSTREAM INV.
255.62' 0
e
10'X10' BOX CULVERT A
UPSTREAM STREAM N
BOTTOM ELEV. 253.62' 2
UPSTREAM BURIED BOX
INV. 252.62'
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
270
TEMPORARY
268
I M PACT
266
264
262
260
258
256
254
252
250
)IA. CMP
UPSTREAM
248
255.62'
5
' BOX CULVERT
EAM STREAM
M ELEV. 253.62'
EAM BURIED BOX
52.62'
)RARY COFFER
SND DIVERSION
JEL (NOT
J)
NG GRADE
DOWNSTREAM
0+99
270
268
266
264
262
260
258
256
254
252
250
248 �T
50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
UPSTREAM
1+66
q
FINISHED GRADE
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
(67 LF. PIPE)
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
(80 LF) PIPE TO BE
BURIED 1 FT. TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE
PASSAGE
84" CMP PIPE
DOWNSTREAM INV. 254.98'
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
DOWNSTREAM STREAM
BOTTOM ELEV. 252.98'
DOWNSTREAM BURIED BOX
CULVERT INV. 251.98'
IyI�I[.y7I��Zel:7_U7�
84" DIA. CMP PIPE
(67 LF. PIPE)
10'X10' BOX CULVERT
(67 LF) PIPE TO BE
BURIED 1 FT. TO ALLOW
FOR AQUATIC LIFE
PASSAGE
84" CMP PIPE
UPSTREAM INV.
255.62' 0
e
10'X10' BOX CULVERT A
UPSTREAM STREAM N
BOTTOM ELEV. 253.62' 2
UPSTREAM BURIED BOX
INV. 252.62'
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.

LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY STREAM B1
IMPACT = 4 LF.
PERMANENT STREAM B1
DISSIPATOR IMPACT = 25 LF.
PERMANENT STREAM B1
IMPACT = 93 LF.
48" RCP PIPE
q
2
q
z
-A--
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
WETLAND B
TOTAL = 0.15 AC. OR 6,534 SF.
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT = 23 LF.
NOTES a 8
U
1. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN (HUC 03030020609) d z°
B. EVERETT JORDAN LAKE - NEW HOPE RIVER{((19
[gym
W� N j
2. DWR STREAM INDEX #: 16-14-10-1 (REEDY BRANCH) tt � o
STREAM CLASSIFICATION: WS -IV; NSW Q
3. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ISSUED 11/23/16
(USACE ACTION ID: SAW -2016-01993)
4. TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION ISSUED A
11/01/16 (APEX 16-010) =1V
o Z
U
ZONE 2 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.05 AC. O
OR 2,095 SF. E o..4
o
Q
EXISTING ZONE 2 50 FT. STREAM BUFFER
0
ZONE 1 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.17 AC. o W
OR 7,572 SF. o
N
TEMPORARY STREAM 61
IMPACT = 23 LF. W
s
0
EXISTING ZONE 1 30 FT. STREAM BUFFER 2
N
X
WETLAND B Q
IMPACT = 0.004 AC. OR 173 SF. O
0 0
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM B1 + 1,096 LF. N V Z
Z
o •�TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS f
V Z
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM B1 - IMPACTED STREAM BUFFER: 0
ZONE 1 = 0.17 AC. OR 7,572 SF.
o �
ZONE 2 = 0.05 AC. OR 2.095 SF.
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS = 0.22 AC. OR 9,667 SF. r 1 a
0
w
STREAM BI IMPACTS: y
STREAM BI - TEMP = 27 LF.
STREAM BI - PERM = 93 LF.
STREAM BI - PERM DISSIPATOR = 25 LF.
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS = 145 LF.
o z
N o 1 0� o
Co o N
00
U7 Co N
TOTAL IMPACTED WETLAND U "'
o
0 0
� z
WETLAND B = 0.15 AC. OR 6.534 SF. W z w
TOTAL IMPACTED WETLAND = + 0.004 AC. OR 173 SF. a w a
X
iJ MCADAMS

TEMPORARY STREAM AA
IMPACT = 6 LF.
PERMANENT STREAM AA
DISSIPATOR IMPACT = 21 LF.
RETAINING WALL
PERMANENT STREAM AA
IMPACT = 91 LF
48" RCP PIPE
z
•
TNm�
N OTES
1. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN (HUC 03030020609) xz
B. EVERETT JORDAN LAKE — NEW HOPE RIVER
O
2. DWR STREAM INDEX #: 16-14-10-1 (REEDY BRANCH) N g s
STREAM CLASSIFICATION: WS—IV; NSW Q
3. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ISSUED 11/23/16
(USACE ACTION ID: SAW -2016-01993)
4. TOWN OF APEX STREAM BUFFER DETERMINATION ISSUED A
Q
11/01/16 (APEX 16-010) � U
o
LIMITS OF E O
DISTURBANCE
E
°
ZONE 2 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.08 AC. Q V S
OR 3,355 SF.
w 0
EXISTING ZONE 2 50 FT. o
STREAM BUFFER N
u
ZONE 1 STREAM BUFFER IMPACT = 0.19 AC.
OR 8,111 SF. y 0
x z�
EXISTING ZONE 1 30 FT. N 0 Z
STREAM BUFFER o O rn
U
K
O
Z
TEMPORARY STREAM AA Z U
IMPACT = 21 LF o
O
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM
AA TOTAL = 139 LF. r0
o �
V
O
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS
y
E
RPW INTERMITTENT STREAM AA — IMPACTED STREAM BUFFER:
ZONE 1 = 0.19 AC. OR 8,111 SF.
ZONE 2 = 0.08 AC. OR 3.355 SF.
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS = 0.26 AC. OR 1 1 ,466 SF. o o z
oo
Co o LnN
0o II
U7 Co N
STREAM AA IMPACTS:
o
STREAM AA — TEMP = 27 LF. z w
STREAM AA — PERM = 91 LF. W z w
STREAM AA — PERM DISSIPATOR = 21 LF. a w
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS = 139 LF. a a w a
X
iJ MCADAMS