20171201 Ver 1_401 Application_20170921

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2017-01857
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Airport South
Wetlands and Ern�ronmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Wndner, PLLC.
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial 2 0 1 7 1 2 0 1
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Update and Permit Application for a commercial/industrial development.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: McCraney Property Com
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group j SFp 2 12017
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blbj�1
35.2037N/ -80.9245W
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a]: 14311172, 14310108, 14309103 and 14310107
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Taggart Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑7
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #3, 12, 33 and 39
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
September 20, 2017
Mr. David L. Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Subject: SAW -2017-01857 - Pre -Construction Notification for NWP #3, #12, #33 and #39 and a
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Update for the Airport South Site, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, NC
Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Shaeffer, Johnson, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #3, #12, #33 and #39 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request Update associated with the proposed Airport South Site located in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, NC. The site is situated near developed, commercial/industrial use areas and is
located just south of the Charlotte Airport. It consists of two intermittent streams (Intermittent Streams A
and AA), two perennial streams (Perennial Streams B/C and F) and two wetlands (Wetlands D/E and G).
Approximate length of all streams identified within the site total 3,576 linear feet. The two identified
onsite wetlands total approximately 0.08 acres. A site visit was conducted to review and confirm WEPG's
delineation on August 24, 2017 by Alan Johnson of NCDEQ. A subsequent Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request was submitted to the USACE on August 29, 2017. This request was submitted
prior to the site being surveyed; however, the appended request has been updated to include a more
accurate approximation of onsite stream lengths and wetland areas verified by NCDEQ. Please refer to
accompanying Jurisdictional Determination section for updated information as a supplement the August
291h request.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
In addition to the exiting surface waters identified onsite, current conditions include an approximate 591
linear foot culvert that conveys flow from an offsite stream (Perennial Stream H) to Perennial Stream F.
Condition of the culvert is poor and is exposed and failing in several locations. As shown on the appended
historical aerials, this culvert was installed in the mid to late 1960's for construction of a raceway. This
historical impact has not been permitted but will be accounted for as an impact as part of this project.
Because this impact occurred prior to 1996, impacts associated with the historical installation of this
culvert qualify as an acreage impact. This historical impact totals approximately 0.095 acres. Please refer
to Table 1 for a summary of historical and proposed impacts associated with this project.
Table 1: Summary of Proposed Stream Impacts/Permits
Impact (Permanent (P) or Temporary (T))
Permit No.
Stream Impact
Historical Culvert Installation/Removal P
3
0.095 Acres
Utility Line Activities T
12
80 LF
Temporary Access T
33
80 LF
Commercial Developments P
39
300 LF
Total Impacts
0.095 Acres / 460 LF
Avoidance and Minimization Discussion:
The Airport South Business Park has been designed to optimize available buildable area while preserving
existing wetlands and minimizing impacts to onsite streams. Due to the location of the onsite stream and
the restricted space within the site, complete avoidance of impacts was not practicable. Impacts to site
surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through design location/orientation
of the proposed structures and limiting adjacent parking areas. Impacts from the currently proposed
project will total approximately 300 linear feet of permanent impacts and approximately 160 linear feet of
temporary impacts. Proposed permanent impacts are to include the removal of the existing 42 -inch, 591
linear foot CMP culvert and replace it with an approximate 42 -inch, 940 linear foot RCP culvert. This
proposed culvert will capture flow from the offsite Perennial Stream H at the current culvert inlet location
and bypass flow to Perennial Stream F at an outfall location approximately 300 linear feet downstream
from the current culvert outfall location/origin of Perennial Stream F. The 300 LF of permanent impacts
to Perennial Stream F will allow the four buildings on the northern side of the site to retain the shared
driveway that will be required by the City to access West Boulevard. At the end of the driveway, a cul-
de-sac was included to allow for fire access and vehicle turning movements. The cul-de-sac requires a
large fill slope to tie in to existing grade at the end of the road due to the steep existing grades on site.
The impacts to Stream F have been limited by including a retaining wall at the end of the stream impacts
to reduce the overall length of the slope.
Additional impacts to Intermittent Stream A were considered in a conceptual design to join all five
buildings into a single site. However, the site was proposed as is to avoid permanent wetland impacts to
the extent feasible while yielding enough developable area to make the site financially viable. All
additional stream impacts are temporary in nature and will be planted and restored to preconstruction
conditions. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of this project.
Temporary Impacts
Temporary impacts total approximately 160 linear feet and are associated with two temporary access
crossings, two utility crossings and two temporary construction access areas at the intake and outfall of
the proposed culvert. Use of temporary crossings at the designated locations will be necessary to provide
access for transport of fill in construction of proposed structure building pads. Each temporary crossing
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 2 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
location will have approximately 30 linear feet of impacts due to temporary fill and culvert installation.
Temporary Crossing #1 will be installed to transport fill from the southwestern portion of the site to the
northeastern portion of the site. Temporary crossing #2 will be installed to transport fill from a borrow
area located south of Perennial Stream B/C and west of Perennial Stream F. Approximate installation of
the temporary access locations will occur in the spring of 2018. Construction schedule for Buildings 100,
200 and 400 will begin in 2018 and in 2021 for Buildings 300 and 500. Construction is anticipated to
conclude in 2022. The proposed temporary crossings will be necessary for the duration of this period for
planned cut and fill transport and site access during construction. All temporary crossings will be installed
in accordance with NCDEQ Water Quality Certification Number 4094 and Charlotte Land Development
Standards. Once construction is completed, all temporary fills will be removed in their entirety and the
affected areas returned to pre -construction elevations. The affected areas will be revegetated, as
appropriate.
Two additional impact areas are associated with temporary construction access at the inlet and outfall
locations of the proposed 940 linear foot culvert. Each location will have approximately 10 linear feet of
associated temporary impacts for construction access. These temporary impacts will be restored to
preconstruction conditions and will utilize matting and temporary stabilization to limit erosion and
reestablish vegetation along the banks. A Conceptual Enhancement Plan A is attached and provides
details for the stabilization of stream banks associated with both temporary crossings and construction
access impacts.
Temporary impacts for the proposed utility line crossings are associated with access and excavation
implementing open -cut construction methods. Preliminary plans for stream crossings of the utility lines
were to include boring techniques; however, both locations were determined to not be feasible due
challenging topography and shallow bedrock. Impacts from the temporary excavation will be restored to
preconstruction conditions and will utilize matting and temporary stabilization to limit erosion and
reestablish vegetation along the banks. A Conceptual Enhancement Plan B is attached and provides
details for the stabilization of stream banks.
Proposed Mitigation:
As mentioned above, the site has been heavily influenced by its urban setting and historical use. Onsite
streams have been impacted by historic and current use and current concentrated stormwater flows have
severely degraded stream morphology and habitat potential. The assessed reach (Perennial Stream F) has
also been highly impacted by past channelization, rerouting and capture within the 591 -foot culvert.
In attempts to better quantify the functional capacity of Perennial Stream F, a NCSAM (Version 2.1) was
conducted. Results of the NCSAM were slightly skewed by the higher substrate, stream stability and
thermoregulation scores. However, impacts due to channelization, incision and historical impacts were
accurately influencing the final functional rating. Overall results of the NCSAM indicated a low
Functional Class Rating for the onsite reach. This score is an accurate representation of the reach function
when considering the current and historic anthropogenic influences on its potential, more natural
condition. Any potential for stream rehabilitation and habitat development is severely restricted due its
current functional capacity and the chronic impacts from direct and adjacent land use influences. Please
refer to the NCSAM Stream Assessment section for metrics scores and ratings summaries.
To compensate for the proposed stream impacts, while incorporating the current functional capacity of the
onsite channel, the applicant is proposing payment into N.C. Division Mitigation Services (NCDMS). The
acceptance letter provided by NCDMS indicates the site is within the expanded service area which
typically doubles the mitigation ratio. Based on this information, we are proposing an overall/final
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 3 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
mitigation ratio of 3:1 for 300 linear feet of stream channel impacts. Enclosed is the conditional
acceptance letter from NCDMS.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site in which no listed
species were identified within the project area. The site is wooded which may be considered summer
roosting habitat for the listed Northern Long Eared Bat. However, we have consulted with the latest
guidance associated with the Final 4(d) ruling and there are no known hibernation and/or roosts sites
within a 45 -mile radius of the project area. Based on this information we believe that the project meets the
exemption criteria for the 4(d) rule and formal USFWS concurrence is not required.
Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, [phone] or
email at heath.caldwella,wet] ands-epg).com.
Sincerely,
Heath Caldwell Len Rindner, PWS
Environmental Scientist Principal
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 4 [e-mail]

Permit Application

O�O� WA7�9�G
v
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. 2017-01857
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3/12/33/39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes 0 No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes NX No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
N Yes 0 No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Airport South
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Crescent Resources LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
227 West Trade Street Suite 1000
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
3f.
Telephone no.:
980-321-6000
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Buyer
4b.
Name:
Andrew Jacobson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
McCraney Property Company
4d.
Street address:
2257 Vista Parkway, Suite 17
4e.
City, state, zip:
West Palm Beach, FL 33411
4f.
Telephone no.:
561-478-4300
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Heath Caldwell
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-999-5279
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
14311172, 14310108, 14309103 and 14310107
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.2037 Longitude: -80.9245
1 c.
Property size:
54.4 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Taggart Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
03050103
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is composed of vacant, forested land. General land use in the vicinity consists of commercial developments.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.08
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,576
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Update and Permit Application for a commercial/industrial development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PJD Request was submitted to the USACE on 8/29/17.
q
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): P. Kealy
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit was conducted by Alan Johnson of NCDEQ on 8/24/2017 to confirm WEPG's delineation. A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
was submitted to the USACE on August 29, 2017 and updates to this request are included for preliminary determination.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Please see attached Table 2 for a proposed impacts inventory.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

Table 2. Pr000sed Imoacts Inventory/ Stream Imoacts -
Stream Impact
number Permanent
(P) or Temporary
Type of Impact
Stream Name
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)
Type of Jurisdiction
Average Stream
Width (feet)
Impact Length (linear
feet)
S1 - P
Culvert
Stream F
PER
Corps
7
300
S2 - T
Culvert
Stream B/C
PER
Corps
7
30
S3 - T
Culvert
Stream B/C
PER
Corps
7
30
S4 -T
Excavation
Stream H (offsite)
PER
Corps
7
10
SS - T
Excavation
Stream F
PER
Corps
7
10
S6 - T
Excavation
Stream B/C
PER
Corps
7
40
S7 -T
Excavation
Stream B/C
PER
Corps
7
40
Total Impacts
460
• Impacts from historically installed culvert are accounted for in this permit application. Total impacts from the installation of culvert
qualify as an acreage impact and total approximately 0.095 acres.

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the location of the onsite stream and the restricted space within the site, complete avoidance of impacts was not practicable. Impacts to site
surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through design location/orientation of the proposed structures and limiting
adjacent parking areas. Of the approximate 3576 linear feet of stream located on-site, only 300 linear feet of impacts are proposed as part of this
project. No wetlands will be impacted as part of this project. Please refer to cover letter for additional avoidance and minimization efforts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
300 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
55%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Z Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Storm water on the site will be handled/treated by BMPs as shown on the attached plans. The stormwater
plan has not been submitted/approved by
Mecklenburg County but has been designed to meet their criteria.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
X❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
F] Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes
E] No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
E] Yes
No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional phases are proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via existing and proposed sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in cover letter. Report is included
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ YesX❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ YesX❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ YesX❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountyne.gov/
D gilally signel by Heap Caltlwell
DN
Caldwell
Heath Caldwell
Heath °hathtc dwell@well dsepg com,-US
Date 2017 002013.31: 43-04'00'
09-20-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

)NERG_.,.�_
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Airpark South/Airport South
Property Address: 3617 West Bv., Charlotte, NC 28208
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 14311101, 14310101, 14311172, 14310108, 14309103, 14309108 and
14309108
Select one: I am an intereste uye seller
Name: Andrew Jacobson
Company: McCraney Property Company
Mailing Address: 2257 Vista Parkway, Suite 17, West Palm Beach, FL 33411
Telephone Number: 561-478-4300
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Buyer* / Other
Date
* The Intefested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd- Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10. PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] (828)708-70S9
len [e-mail] 2 amanda lonesCOwetlands-epg.com

Mitigation Services
P#IV IRON MEN TA LOU ALIT
August 28, 2017
Andrew Jacobson
McCraney Property Company
2257 Vista Parkway Suite 17
West Palm Beach, FL 33411
Project: Airpark South/Airport South
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/27/2018
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by
an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location T Impact Type Impact Quantity
_ (8 -digit HUC)
Catawba 03050103* Warm Stream 1 300
**DMS proposes use of the Catawba 03 Emanded Service Area for this impact Upon receipt of payment,
DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in
accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions
or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Heath Caldwell, agent
Sincerely,
James. Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
State oCNorth Carolina I Crwonmennil Quality i M!tieation Services
1652 Mail Serwe Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W, Jones Street, Suite 3000
9 19 707 8976 T

on
Historical Aerials

i
i
4
' r ♦ •. �a f • k �� SYS Rk, � � ..�
16 4
SITE
1
x
+i I
K=
Photo 1: Historical Aerial (1968) of the area depicting the stream flow diverted to
current conditions and culverted through the raceway.
Airport South
REEGMecklenburg County, NC— Historical Aerials
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.

f4w
Photo 2: Enlarged scale of the 1968 Historical Aerial depicting the stream
culverted through the raceway infield.
Airport South
Mecklenburg County, NC — Historical Aerials
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

N
Photo 3: Historical Aerial (1978) of the area depicting the stream culverted
through the raceway infield.
Airport South
WEEGMecklenburg County, INC — Historical Aerials
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLIC.

�y `� Imo•
� r '•� r• f + ,nom"?'rti- r �4v r� �•if r �r�7 A` ..,,, •atr .t1 �
tie
"A I
� �•T Jam, +,� •Y J ��� r ��
• ` Lh `�1 . �� 4: f, t'. ,q' er �,?1. f 1 s IA
IRS..• � 11�.�, f i �;i
`r. a y�• �
r . . Y 9� • ��°,� r J�}yAY •t
!�i r
J
a

C�
Maps/Plans

'*AA 0��
~.D
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
f b_
. =.
cfftas
f7 bR
AIRPORT SOUTH Drawn By: Reviewed
Mecklenburg Co., NC LRG LSR
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group .
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. AERIAL MAT
OF
[e-mail] EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
[phone]
www.wetiands-epg.com SUBJECT TO USACEINCDEQ VERIFICATION

SOIL MAP
Mecklenburg County, NC
506200 506400 506600 506800 507000 507200
Map Scale: 1:8,220 t prin6ed on A podrA (8.5" x 11") sheet.
nN 0 100 200 400 600
N
0 350 700 1400 2100reset
Map projedlon: Web Mercator Comer ccomrinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
SHEET 4 OF 22 LEONARD S. RINDNER PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
(704) 904 — 2277
[e-mail]
USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service
AIRPORT SOUTH
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, SC
NRCS SOIL MAP
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
SHEET
DRAWN SAL REVIEWED -SR
BY: BY.
DATE PAGE
05122114

Airport
UL
1
CUB
M is B �n rZ Fi _
PROJECT BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
UL
Fn13 M63
Ry
�J 1. WF D m'• —
44Q
EFnB M
MeS
M eq
c o'
?j McE3 reb IEnB
r,ep2
444
{;eD2 MtA83 Me D
..0 .N, e82
C D2
SHEET 5 OF 22
AIRPORT SOUTH
Mecklenburg Co., INC
USDA PUBLISHED SOILS MAP — WATERS OF
THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO NCDEQ VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
LRG -SR
DATE:
8/3/17

SHEET 7 OF 22
AIRPORT SOUTH Drawn By: Reviewed
Mecklenburg Co., NC LRG LSR
PARCEL MAP I DATE:
-WATERS OF THE U.S.- 8/3/17
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

N ` Q Flow Path: Jurisdictional features on the site flow into
}►� ` '� — R •� an unnamed tributary to Taggart Creek to Taggart Creek
• `` _6` F then to Sugar Creek (TNW).
•: �. . _ /
.a_
qu
�W r • .� `. o
a)>1 E
` c U
m U
.o
✓°r > Z
t } T L
fi +
a+ '
U '
r-
_. a
•
,.. / t � •,..^� a y _.
e
J
CL
R
lop—
Legend { \.
QProject Boundary some
�SHEET s of 22
1111111111110- Flow PathIL
'
0 500 1,000 2,0001111� 1111111111111 71
( v
/ f �, August 3, 2017
\ Feet, Copyright:,© 2013 ational Geographic Society i -cubed

SEASONAL STREAM AA
±225 LF
±0.10 ACRE
9
West Boulevard (N.C. Hwy. 160)
M*w W -00 -
PERENNIAL STREAM H
(OFFSITE)
±642 LF
±0.045 ACRE
.� 1. ice' _
PERENNIAL STREAM B/C
,±1276 LF
±0.22 ACRE,
q
SEASONAL STREAM A
±248 LF
±0.062 ACRE 9
WETLAND G l
PROPERTY BOUNDARY ±0.02 AC /
LINE, TYP. f
� ya
4�t .,a�
Jt esti
f Pt°j
'�' .., _ ��,,,'J „�►C Ja 1 fid'
0
W.
M'
PERENNIAL STREAM F
±1827 LF
±0.27 ACRE
WETLAND D/E
±0.06 ACRE
SCALE: V= 400'
0 200 400 800
Shaping Environment
Re
Realizingthe Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL
EXISITING CONDITIONS
Land Planning
200 South Tryon Street
�i'O/E4/@fip.Si
Landscape Architecture
Civil Engineering
Suite 1400
Charlotte, North Carolina
28202
P+1°43761555
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
Project No. 4321.03
SHEET 9 OF 22
Issued 09118117
y
& Stone
urban Desi n
g
t+,0437678,enee s
ud+www.co�e t tonecom
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:
PP 9

JURISDICTIONAL WATER IMPACTS A
tey
West Boulevard (N.C. Hwy. 160)
HEADWALL RECONSTRUCTION FOR
e':
REALIGNMENT
±10 LF TEMPORARY IMPACTS
JURISDICTIONAL WATER
° 1
/
IMPACTS A 621 LF
RE—ROUTING 1-48" RCP
CULVERT WITH MANHOLES
a
5�g�q• .y
p
�7y
N
�vkg IV
BMP #1 OUTLET.
\
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
±30 LF TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE.
36" PIPE TO MAINTAIN 2 YEAR
°�, r ' e• STREAM IMPACTS A
PEAK FLOW.
�y y-
'` �` 300 LF DISTURBANCE
1-48 RCP CULVERT
WATER UTILITY CROSSING
1 '
a WITH HEADWALL
l
t
SEWER UTILITY CROSSING;
\� ofi BMP #3 OUTLET
BMP #2 OUTLET
�' Gtexl`
a 'per PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LI N E, TYP.
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING"5
±30 LF TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE.
48" PIPE TO MAINTAIN 2 YEAR
SCALE: 1"= 400'
PEAK FLOW.
0 200 400
800
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH INDUSTRIAL
OVERALL SITE PLAN
Land Planning
200 South Tryon Street
Suite 1400
Landscape Architecture
St Civil Engineering
Charlotte, North Carohna
Pi 704376 1555
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
Project No.4321.03
Issued 09/18/17 SHEET 10 OF 22
y
& Stone Urban Design
04 376 7851
6 70437678
u 70437 colejeneststonecom
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:
PP 9

655 655
EXIST. GRADE
II
650
650
_-._ - __._ ._ 87.01 LF OF 8" RCP 0 2.10%
645 --- --- - - -- -- ----- --- ------ -- -- - -- 645
f
940 LF, 48" RC !CULVERT:
G BURIEDI 9.6" AT INLET AN6
640 } . _-._ w _ .- ___ __ - OUTLET. MAINT_ N BOTTOM__
_ _._,__ _ _.. �__ ____ . ____._ __ 640
INVERT, PROFILE THROUGH
PROPOSED INVERT" STRUCTURES.
BURIED 9.6"
635 A 635
4 8'" 3 OF
ty1H-S5 ? R P ®2 j
STA: 11+44.88
-' •-
630 630
INV IN: 635;62 (MH -S6)
MH -S6 INV OUT: 635.62
STA: 104-57.27
625
625 ! -- _._ ____ _ �_Ipa�._ . _. ----._ ..---_ t __.__. _. ___ _ _ __.- _ ... ____ _. _�
6q,�g ...._ _
INV IN:637.46 (HW -S7)
25.26 LF OF 48" RCP ® 2.13% INV OUTi 637.46
MH -S4
STA: 14+89.71
620 r 64t:5fJ - 620
±591 LF EXISTING 42 C P CULVE T INV 11:628.38 !MH -S5)
TO BE REMOVEa AND REPLACED WIFi
INV OU .:628.38
j PROPOSED 48" ROP CULVERT �
I
615 - } - ---{ - - -} ... -- { - - - - - } -.- - { }.. __._'- { 615
9+f50 1000 10+50 11+00 11+50 12 0 1250 1300 13+50 1401 14+50 15 00
SCALE:
1 "=80'
H
SCALE:
1 "=8'
V
zoo South Tryon street
160'
0 4'
16'
0 40'
80'
8'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
STREAM IMPACT A
zoo South Tryon street
PROFILE (STA. 9+50 to 15+00)
Land Planning
landscape Architecture
Suite 1400
Charlotte, North Carolina
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
Project No. 4321.03
Ct
Civil Engineering
28202
P+7043761555
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
SHEET 11 OF 22
Issued 09118/17
& Stone
+ Design
urban Desi
f+7 www -4376 a51nf55onPC0m
url+www.c0le e t t
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:
PP 9

645
640
635
630 630
625
620
END
615
610
605
300' (STREAM OISTU
IST. GRACIE P OP. GRADE
42 Urn,
G CUVERT TO,BE REMOVED i, 940 LF'48" RCP I
AND REPLACED WITH INLET AND OUTLET,
PROPOSED 48" RCP CULVERT INVERT PROFILE TI
645
-6
635
JLVERT BURIED 9.6" AT
MAINTAIN BOTTOM
20UGH STRUCTURES.
630
101.35 LF OF 48" RCP ®2.10
_ _____� 7 _ —_-_. —..._
— 625
GEOSYNTHETIP REINFORCED
SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BLOCK
RETAINING WALL AS HEADWALL
r
- -- -
620
�F EXISTING
CULVERT MH—S3 PROPOSED INVERT
„ 1 STA: T7+93.38 BURIED 9.6"
303.67 4�F-OF 48 _RCP 2:10%_ - RIAAs- 637 80 615
INV IN:622.00 (MH—S4) MH—S2 61.2;4 LF OF 48" RCP ® 2.00%
INV OU� : 622.00
STA: 18+94.74 i
RIME 635.00
610
INV 6 9.837
N
6
0SCALE: H
0 40' 80' 160
60 5 00--I
50 + 1600 _+T
15 -- -
-- -----
1650 1700
_
r _ _t5O
+ 1750 -F 1800 1850 1900 19+2000-2050
_
0 1"=$'
SCALE. V
0 4' 8' 16'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
STREAM IMPACT A
Land Planning
200 South Tryon Street
PROFILE (STA. 15+00 to 20+00)
landscape Architecture
Suite 1400
Charlotte, North Carolina
28202
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
Project No. 4321.03 SHEET 12 OF 22
CA St
C,yil Engineering
P+7043761555
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
Issued 09/18117
& Stone
Urhan Desin
g
"1+ww767851^
ud+www.colee estztonecom
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking NO:
PP 9

660
660
658
656
654
652
650
650
PR G A E
648
646
644
642
640
1EX. GRADE'.
640
638
636
PR.
48"RP
634
EX 4 M
632
630
630
628
626
624
622
62030
—20 —10
0
10 20 30
40 50 60 20
SCALE: 111=10'
0 5' 10' 20'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
STREAM IMPACT A
Land Planning
zoo South Tryon street
SECTION (STA. 11+91.84)
Land—p, Architecture
Suite 1400
Charlotte, North Carolina
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
Project No.4321.03
Co/eJen St
Civil Engineering
zszoz
P, 704376 1555
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
SHEET 13 OF 22
Issued 09/18117
& Stone
Urban Design
f+ 7043767"
04 376 7551
url+www.colejeneststone.com
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:

660
660
658
656
654
P
VA DRI A
ID WA K I I
BLQG. I L I I I I I HROP0 ED BU LD NG
652
650
650
F
648
646
644
642
640
640
638
PR GAE
EX.GADI
636
634
632
630
— — — — —
— — — —
630
628
626
624
622
620
620
E 2" CM ID
618
616
614
—
—
—
612
61030
1+1
1
1
—20 —10
0
10 20 30 40
50 6010
SCALE: Ill
0 5' 10' 20'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
STREAM IMPACT A
Planning
200 South Tryon Street
SECTION (STA. 15+56.27)
Land
Landscape Architecture
Suite 1400
2hharrlotte, North Carolina
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
Project No. 4321.03
ColeJeneSt
Ci,il Engineering
8 0
Pi 7043761555
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
Issued 09/18117 SHEET 14 OF 22
& Stone
Urban Desi g
ta7043 rileje1nf5
Irl. www.<nle [slon<.<Om
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:
PP 9

f�� �1t�alifti
f l�r i I
r fr i
MH—S5
f r 3
WEST BOULEVARD ��,
PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY' -<dt
q
A
PR. 48" RCP TO BE FLUSH WITH
i PR. SEGMENTAL CONCRETE
r BLOCK RETAINING WALL
PR. 48" RCP TO MAINTAIN SLOPE ! 4
AND BOTTOM OF PIPE PROFILE
.THROUGHOUT SYSTEM
MH—S6
` MH —S4
I ff
HW—S7
±591 LF EX. 42" CMP
I ISI a TO BE REMOVED
PR. 48" RCP BURIED 9.6"
a
I I I � ' AT HEADWALL (HW—S7)
it El
206,
r
11 1 1 ±10 LF TEMPORARY IMPACTS
TO PERENNIAL STREAM H
I FOR CONSTRUCTION '
MH—S3
t a'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
Land Planning
200 South Tryon Street
IM
c
Suite 1400
Landscape Architecture
Charlotte, North Carolina
S
Civil Engineering
28202
p+ 770043761555
P+
•• '
f+ 704 376 7851
& Stone
Urban Design
url+ wwwcolejeneststone.,om
MH—S3
t a'
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK I STREAM IMPACT A
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33411
Project No. 4321.03 SHEET 15 OF 22
Issued 09118117
Application Tracking No:
IM
c
tl
-�ll,lltrjuui.ir
•• '
-,� �,��►�
� ��II 1111111
�1 �11'� t.1111���►
• - t �� I iiil''rrr
•
Ijll
i • 1s����111i��i111l�,
�1
I "
ILI
al
• •
L
II
1 I II
11
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK I STREAM IMPACT A
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33411
Project No. 4321.03 SHEET 15 OF 22
Issued 09118117
Application Tracking No:

r
i
i ! I
PR. SEGMENTAL CONCRETE
j r _ BLOCK RETAINING WALL'
r
a.
¢ 300 LF PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACTS FOR
00 PERENNIAL STREAM F
HW—S7 \
HW—S1
— —
° , 1 MH—S2
±10 LF TEMPORARY
MH—S6
STREAM IMPACTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION
±591 LF EX. 42" CMP PIPE �
E
s
I TO BE REOMVED AND ±10 LF TEMPORARY
REPLACED WITH PR. 48" RCP' --,STREAM IMPACTS FOR
t
CONSTRUCTION
INSE7 A SCALE: 1 "=30' IN8E7 B SCALE: 1 "=30'
0 15' 30' 60' 0 15' 30' 60'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK STREAM IMPACT A
Land Planning 200 South Tryon Street INSET AIB
Suite 1400
Landscape Architecture Charlotte, North Carolina McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY No. 4321.03 Project
za2o2
CO/e1 SHEET 16 OF 22�
�/enest Civil Engineering p+7043761555 2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17 Issued 09/18/17f+ 704 376 7851
$ StOAe Urban Design url+www.cole;eeststone<om WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411 Application Tracking No:

t
8" WATER MAIN PLACED IN
1
20" CASING INSTALLED IN
OPEN—CUT ACCROSS STREAM,
I
--""` —
MIN. 3' BETWEEN BOTTOM OF
CREEK AND TOP OF CASING /
STREAM T
OF BATYP.
10' RIP—RAP SUMP ` `
PERENNIAL STREAM
PIT WITH TEMPORARY
B/C CENTERLINE
PUMP AROUND.
10
0
11+68.
3�00, 11+00
U P
i
1
i
s
i
40 LF TEMPORARY
OPEN—CUT LIMITRS`t,
40 LF TEMPOR'AR I
e--
8" SANITARY SEWER PLACED �'OPEN—CUT
LIOITS!
IN 20 CASING INSTALLED IN
OPEN—CUT ACROSS STREAM,
2p
_
MIN. 3' BETWEEN BOTTOM OF 00
CREEK AND TOP OF CASING
'
RING FILTER AS \
' REQUIRED BY INSPECTOR — — V�
w--
10 RIP—RAP SUMP PIT
-
FOR TEMPORARY PUMP 1 ��
1
AROUND DISCHARGE.
SCALE: 1 "=30' H
0 15' 30' 60'
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
UTILITY STREAM CROSSING
PLAN
Land Planning 200 South Tryon Street
Suite 1400
Land—pe Architecture Charlotte, North Carolina
Civil Engineering 282 04 376 1555
ri0/e./eneSt
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
2257 VISTA PARKWAY SUITE 17
Project No. 4321.03 y
Issued 09118117 SHEET 17 OF 22�
f+ 704 376 7851
& Stone Urban Design url+w—coe;eneststoneeorn
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:

STREAM
NOTES:
1. REMOVE THE STRUCTURE WHEN NO
LONGER NEEDED. (NOT TO EXCEED 1
YEAR).
2. AS A MINIMUM, DESIGN THE
STRUCTURE TO PASS 2 YEAR PEAK
FLOW WITHOUT OVERTOPPING.
3. ENSURE THAT DESIGN FLOW VELOCITY
AT THE OUTLET OF THE CROSSING
STRUCTURE IS NON—EROSIVE FOR THE
RECEIVING STREAM CHANNEL.
4. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE EROSION CONTROL
COORDINATOR OR CITY ENGINEER
BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS.
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(:11A RLO TF.. INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ
NOTE: DEEM TO FOLLOW NWP
33/401 CERTIFICATION REOUIREMENTS
GC 4094
1/2 RPE DIAMETER 12'
YMICHIEVER IS
ER
RIP RAP
ine"' c tate n y
PROVIDE PIPE SIZE, INVERTS, SLOPE AND MATERIAL
FOR EACH CROSSING.
... S(
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
30.14 I
Shaping the Environment
Realizing the Possibilities
AIRPORT SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
TEMPORARY STREAM
CROSSING DETAIL
Land Planning
200 South Tryon Street
+
Landscape Architecture
Suite 1400
Charlotte, North Carolina
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY
Project No. 4321 .03
Cole.leneSt
Civil Engineering
02
P+7043761555
2257 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 17
Issued 09/18117 SHEET 18 OF 22
& Stone
+ g
Urban Desi n
u 704
url+ww7678,1
www.colejeneststone.com
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411
Application Tracking No:
Pp s

CENTER LINE +I-
. • . • SEED & STRAW
I NATIVE SEED MIX AND
2:1 SLOPE REPLANT TREES IN
DISTURBED AREAS
LIVE STAKES/
CONTAINER
• 2
12" COIR V
FIBER LOG
I -
I DISTURBED AREA TO BE
SEEDED (NATIVE MIX),
MATTED & PLANTED (VON
• CENTER — FROM TOP OF
ITOE OF SLOPE SLOPE TO TOE OF SLOPE)
OVERALL PROJECT GOALS
(1) STABILIZE ERODING AREAS W/COIR FIBER BLANKET
(2) INSTALL COIR FIBER LOGS AT TOE OF SLOPE
(3) RE-ESTABLISH NATIVE VEGETATION W/SEED & LIVE
STAKE/CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (Nov'17- March '18)
(4) RESTORATION SIMILAR TO THIS CONCEPT WILL BE
IMPLEMENTED AT THE TEMPORARY CROSSING LOCATIONS
UPON REMOVAL
Materials List:
1. Coir Fiber Logs: Diam. 12", Length 10'
2. Wooden Stakes: Length 3'
3. Erosion Fabric: Coir Fiber Matting — NO PLASTIC
4. Sod Pins: 1,000+
s
SHEET 19 OF 22
Lives Stakes/Containerized Material (3' on center):
('Col—nus amomum (Silky Dogwood), Salix caroliniana (Carolina Willow), Salix sericea (Silky
Willow), Sambucus canadensis (Elderberry), Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Coralberry)
Native Stabilization Seed Mix (20-25 lbs. per acre):
Elymus virginicus (Virginia wild rye), Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gammagrass), Panicum
virgatum (Switchgrass), Agrostis scabra (Rough bentgrass), Carex vulpinoidea (Fox sedge),
Tridens flavus (Purple top), Schizachyrium scoparium (Little bluestem), Coreopsis lanceolata
(Lance leaf tickseed), Sorghastrum nutans (Indian grass), Elymus hystrix (Bottlebrush grass)
estuca ovina var. duriuscala (Hard Fescue), Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan) /
AIRPORT SOUTH
Mecklenburg Co., NC
ENHANCEMENT PLAN A — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACEINCDEQ VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
RAC LSR
DATE: /
9/18/17
PR. SEGMENTAL CONCRETE
SEED, MAT &
BLOCK RETAINING WALL
-- -
\ PLANT FROM TOP
OF BANK TO TOE
OF SLOPE
-
300 LF PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACTS FOR
\
--PERENNIAL STREAM F
HW -S7
y:
...
HW -S1
02
--
MH -S2
MH -S2
'1~
±10 LF TEMPORARY MH-S6
�
_ _
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _
STREAMCIONSTRUCTION FORI
COIR FIBER
_ _
-
1
LOGS
--
�
±591 LF EX, 42' CMP PIPE
TO BE REOMVEO AND
'REPLACED MATH PR. 48' RCPT
310 LF TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACTS FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Lives Stakes/Containerized Material (3' on center):
('Col—nus amomum (Silky Dogwood), Salix caroliniana (Carolina Willow), Salix sericea (Silky
Willow), Sambucus canadensis (Elderberry), Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Coralberry)
Native Stabilization Seed Mix (20-25 lbs. per acre):
Elymus virginicus (Virginia wild rye), Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gammagrass), Panicum
virgatum (Switchgrass), Agrostis scabra (Rough bentgrass), Carex vulpinoidea (Fox sedge),
Tridens flavus (Purple top), Schizachyrium scoparium (Little bluestem), Coreopsis lanceolata
(Lance leaf tickseed), Sorghastrum nutans (Indian grass), Elymus hystrix (Bottlebrush grass)
estuca ovina var. duriuscala (Hard Fescue), Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan) /
AIRPORT SOUTH
Mecklenburg Co., NC
ENHANCEMENT PLAN A — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACEINCDEQ VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
RAC LSR
DATE: /
9/18/17

SEED, MAT &
PLANT FROM TOP
OF BANK TO TOE
OF SLOPE
CENTER LINE +/-
• SEED & STRAW
I NATIVE SEED MIX AND
2:1 SLOPE REPLANT TREES IN
DISTURBED AREAS
I LIVE STAKES/
CONTAINER
I 12" COIR 11
V
FIBER LOG
I
DISTURBED AREA TO BE
SEEDED (NATIVE MIX),
MATTED & PLANTED (VON
• CENTER — FROM TOP OF
TOE OF SLOPE SLOPE TO TOE OF SLOPE)
OVERALL PROJECT GOALS
(1) STABILIZE ERODING AREAS W/COIR FIBER BLANKET
(2) INSTALL COIR FIBER LOGS AT TOE OF SLOPE
(3) RE-ESTABLISH NATIVE VEGETATION W/SEED & LIVE
STAKE/CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (Nov'17-March '18)
RA -4-".-I, 1 :..a.
1. Coir Fiber Logs: Diam. 12", Length 30'
2. Wooden Stakes: Length 3'
3. Erosion Fabric: Coir Fiber Matting - NO PLASTIC
4. Sod Pins: 1,000+
SHEET 20 OF 22
8- WATER MAIN PLACED IN
20- CASING INSTALLED IN
OPEN—CUT ACCROSS STREAM, i
MIN. 3' BETWEEN BOTTOM OF
CREEK AND TOP OF CASING
STREAM TOP
`
OF, BANK, TYP.
10' RIP—RAP SUMP
I
PERENNIAL STREAM
PIT WITH TEMPORA t
C CENTERLINE
PUMP AR �:..
10+10
SEED, MAT &
— COIR FIBER O C. 'a
PLANT FROM TOP
LOGS Qp X. . , `�
OF BANK TO TOE
OF SLOPE
40 LF TEMPOR
/ OPEN—CUT LI
8• SANITARY SEWER PLACED
40 LF T PORAR
_}
IN 20' CASING INSTALLED IN
OPEN— T LIMITS
OPEN—CUT ACROSS STREAM, r. -10
/
MIN. 3' BETWEEN BOTTOM OF
CREEK AND TOP OF CASING
RING FILTER AS
REQUIRED BY INSPECTOR— SEED & STRAW
NATIVE SEED MIX
AND REPLANT TREES IN DISTURBED
10 RIP—RAP SUMP PIT »
AREAS FROM
FOR TEMPORARY PUMP '!
TOP OF BANK TO TOE
�t
AROUND DISCHARGE. f f
OF SLOPE
00
Live Stakes/Containerized Material (3' on center):
Cornus amomum (Silky Dogwood), Salix caroliniana (Carolina Willow), Salix sericea (Silky
Willow), Sambucus canadensis (Elderberry), Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Coralberry)
Native Stabilization Seed Mix (20-25 Ibs. per acre):
Elymus virginicus (Virginia wild rye), Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gammagrass), Panicum
virgatum (Switchgrass), Agrostis scabra (Rough bentgrass), Carex vulpinoidea (Fox sedge),
Tridens flavus (Purple top), Schizachyrium scoparium (Little bluestem), Coreopsis lanceolata
(Lance leaf tickseed), Sorghastrum nutans (Indian grass), Elymus hystrix (Bottlebrush grass)
Festuca ovina var. duriuscala (Hard Fescue), Rudbeckia hirta (Blackeyed Susan)
AIRPORT SOUTH Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
ENHANCEMENT PLAN B- WATERS OF THE U.S. DATE:
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 9/18/17
SUBJECT TO USACEINCDEQ VERIFICATION

O
.4-J
c�S
.E
L-
(3) v
v
w
75
C
O
�+_J
u
V)
.jurisdictional
Determination Information

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http•//www saw usace army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aVx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 25 1-46 10
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: 910-251-4633
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 3617 West Bv.
City, State: Charlotte, NC 28208
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 14311172, 14310108, 14309103 and 14310107
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, WEPG
Mailing Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte NC 28277
Telephone Number: 704-904-2277
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: CRESCENT RESOURCES LLC
Mailing Address: 227 WEST TRADE ST SUITE 1000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
'- Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION 3.a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Si
(Check as many as applicable)
LLI-4-intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid al1 jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perforin activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
F71I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
1-1 I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
aSize of Property or Review Area 54.4 acres.
aThe property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude: -80.9245 W
35.2037 N
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Detennination Fortn' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
✓❑ Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
G 71 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
F4Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
F71NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' w-ww.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re u>1 ley/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form lillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saW.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegLilatory-Permit-Pro.ram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

-- Airport Drive
Perennial Stream F
A. 1827 LF/0.27 Acres
LEGEND
❑ Project Boundary Study Limits
Stream
4 Wetland
Landscape photo/direction
�'� f•/� i NCSAM
o,_ — ";•;,- +' ASSESSMENT
_ '.� J -• - �'�` x - LOCATION
Billy Graham
Blvd
Perennial Stream H (offsite) Wetland DIE
642 LF/0.045 Acres 0.06 Acres
,
UPLAND DATA
i' POINT4
WETLAND
�✓ �,; DATA POINT 3
6ka
3
Perennial Stream B/C
1276 LF/0 22 Acres
Intermittent Stream AA 4't 225 LF/0.1 Acres -11
•to
Wetland G
j. ��' '•' 0.02 Acres
Project Boundary
Intermittent Stream A
West Blvd 248 LF/0.062 Acres
SITE VERIFIED BY NCDEQ 8/24/17
FIGURE NO.
AIRPORT SOUTH SITE Drawn By: Reviewed By:
6 k A JC D/0*" Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
I
-eonard S. I' "' DATE:
•' DELINEATION MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S. 7/27/17
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY NCDEQ Verification
8/24/17
4 , . I , SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

HGKL ..... -
, ,
Local—wi i —Y
Wetland D/E
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.06 ACRE
DELINEATE
35.2017
-80.9238 Taggart Creek
Wetland G
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.02 ACRE
DELINEATE
35.2012
-80.9243 Taggart Creek
Intermittent Stream A
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
248 FOOT
DELINEATE
35.1997
-80.9271 Taggart Creek
Intermittent Stream AA
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
225 FOOT
DELINEATE
35.2005
-80.9287 Taggart Creek
Perennial Stream B/C
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
1276 FOOT
DELINEATE
35.2012
-80.9273 Taggart Creek
Perennial Stream F
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
1827 FOOT
DELINEATE
35.2014
-80.924 Taggart Creek

x..,. ­w b4�.c 63 .0'.
x
x632, x631*2 _ x 63910
A '" * x633,1
0 0
x633,1 0 �'
Seca - -
Inv. 6 3.2' �� X9
b i 632.7 635,9 640,
Inv. 6 3' �.� Inv. ,619.8'
x
' 2'' L _ 629,7 --
�� 34,2 x X62
X630.9
D-
33 4
62 7�
E �� �� 1,1 x625.1 _
x
630.4
WETLAND,, ��E
o . El
-' 0.06 ACRE- - -
X629.4
E2 Of -
* E3 D6 08 x622.7
620.3 Rim 621.94'
63 .2�,� x 07 I.E. i in 6.7'
x 4RENN/A , �STREA F ' x out 61,6.6' x6.
x f 1827` LF
� �.
6 0 ° �o x f 0.27 ACRE
7 \ 12 18,5 �o
p t3
638,
sz
O %518 x621.3
ETLAND G�
7 x635,0 0.02 ACRE .. '
7 —
�a
1 .7 0-
�" 643,9 '• x x61
�.8 �z
x o \�
i44.7 x � �
635.2 i G1M 1 3. r'
- W
/ —x616,8 a—
1
x637.4 .15 2
i n g
appy©X:,; IEJ OtIO/7 4.6
3F1' :��'C buffer x
F
x639.7 A
10
7,31
- D/ CH
f�
1 2
x 641,9 - r'p ` '
613.5
x 41.6 x
DIF 640
/ 1
� --
x
o
642 4
a oY
AGM � x� / Op�rQX. IOCOffQl7
x20.9JSWfM btlffel'� % ` Rim 61
�Ef3 X017 / / iiI.E. in
buffer x I.E. oui
I
6111
6
C
�CH

N
;-+
N
E
N
V1
N
V1
V1
Q
E
N
i
a-+
Q
Ln
U
pni
NCSAM Stream
Assessment

Accompanies User Manual Version 2
�.awumwr versiun c
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Airport South
2. Date of evaluation: 072617
3. Applicant/owner name: McCraney Property Company
4. Assessor name/organization: WEPG
5. County: Mecklenburg
6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Charlotte West, NC
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.2025N/ -80.925W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Perennial Stream F
10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet):
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet):
5 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10
13 Is assessment reach 77 stream? (' Yes (- No
14. Feature type: (: Perennial flow Intermittent flow
( Tidal Nlarsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: (' Mountains (M) h Piedmont (P)
16. Estimated geomorphic k /
valley shape (skip for (+ a
Tidal Marsh Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip (+ Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) (" Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
C Inner Coastal Plain (1) i Outer Coastal Plain (0)
ib
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
(" Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) (' Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? (-- Yes (- No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
r Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( (^ I ( II (- III r IV (" V)
r Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? • Yes No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(' A Water throughout assessment reach.
(: B No flow, water in pools only.
T C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
(: A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
(" B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
(-9 A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
f: A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
(' B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
r^ A < 10% of channel unstable
(. B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
(' C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
r A r A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
r B r B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
(: C (: C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with Floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
r F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F- G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F_ H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
P-1 I Other: portion of stream culverted/channelized (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather–watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought, for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
r A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
{ B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
Ge C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
r Yes rNo Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. r Yes r No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses w r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F cc r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o in - r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation U N O r l Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)t r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v 2 r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
'"""""'''''*''.''""'''*'*'REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS'"'''''"''' ..""""
11. Bedform and Substrate –assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. r Yes (: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
F A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent, Rare (R) = present but <- 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r r is r r Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
r r r (: r Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062-2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
r r r r r Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d r Yes r No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. (: Yes (— No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. (' No Water C Other:
12b. 4: Yes (' No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
F r— Aquatic reptiles
r r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r r Beetles (including water pennies)
r r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrim p)
r r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r r Dipterans (true flies)
r r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r r Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
F r Midges/mosquito larvae
r r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
r r Other fish
r r Salamanders/tadpoles
F r Snails
F r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r r Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB
RB
(` A
(- A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
(i B
t: B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
( C
(' C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
(' A (' A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water? 6 inches deep
(' B (' B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
(: C (: C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
t+ Y (' Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
C N r N
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F_ B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
I- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F7 E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
F A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
F B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
r C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F, D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F, E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above

18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
C A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
C B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
(` C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
(: A (: A (" A ( A ? 100 -feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
C B ( B i B {" B From 50 to < 100 -feet wide
(` C (" C ( C (" C From 30 to < 50 -feet wide
f- D ( D ( D D From 10 to < 30 -feet wide
(' E (' E (: E (+ E < 10 -feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
( A (" A Mature forest
(+' B (: B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
(' C ( C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
C D (' D Maintained shrubs
(` E (` E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
('A ('A f`A ('A (-'A ('A Rowcrops
( B ( B B (" B i B ( B Maintained turf
( C ( C (' C i C (' C (' C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
( D (' D D (" D (' D (` D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
i A ( A Medium to high stem density
(. B B Low stem density
( C f" C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 -feet wide.
LB RB
CA (+ A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
(" B (" B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
(" C (' C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition - First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
( A C A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
f: B (: B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
i C (' C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity - assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. (- Yes r No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. (- No Water (- Other:
25b Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(' A <46 (-B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 i- D 79 to < 230 (' E - 230
Notes/Sketch:
Channel has been piped upstream for the airport property and West Blvd. It is then straightened and channelized adjacent to West Blvd then before beir
r

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name Airport South
Stream Category Pal
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Sum
Date of Evaluation 072617
Assessor Name/Organization WEPG
USACE/
All Streams
YES
NO
YES
Perennial
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2)Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
LOW

a�
v
0
LU
.,
Q)
Q)
+-J
m
Q)
s
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Airport South
Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
August 9, 2017
Charlotte Office:
www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. 1
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Airport South - Threatened /Endcnngered / Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Airport South site (54.42 acres) is located just south of West Boulevard, and
just west of Billy Graham Parkway in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. It
can be found on the Charlotte West, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map;
latitude is 35.2022 N, longitude is -80.9255 W. The topography consists of
upland flats grading into gentle to moderate slopes, with the elevation ranging
from 610 to 690 ft. (Figure 1). The site is covered with a secondary growth,
disturbed mixed pine/hardwood forest, with areas of highly disturbed, overgrown
scrub/shrub thickets, old roads, and trash dumps.
Figure 1:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Airport South Threatened / Endangered / Protected Sj)ecies Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website httr)://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened and Endangered species
for Mecklenburg County North Carolina (Table 1). Table 1 summarizes
listed/protected species recognized in Mecklenburg County as of August 1, 2017.
Maps and aerial photographs were assembled and the site was investigated
August 2, 2017.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Database search performed on August 1, 2017
Group Name Status
Clams
Carolina heelsplitter
Endangered
(Lasmigona decorata)
Flowering
Smooth coneflower (Echinacea
Endangered
Plants
laevi ata
Flowering
Schweinitz's sunflower
Endangered
Plants
(Helianthus schweinitzii�
Flowering
Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Endangered
Plants
michauxii
Mammals
Northern Lona -Eared Bat
Threatened
(Myotis seotentrionalis)
Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Protected
leucocephalus) under the Bald
and Golden
Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Airport South — Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Three plant species with federal protection were included in the survey efforts:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights-of-way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights-of-way, requiring
abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially
occurring in Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
• Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Airport South Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
The site is covered with a secondary growth, disturbed mixed pine/hardwood
forest, with areas of highly disturbed, semi open and overgrown scrub/shrub
thickets, old roads, and trash dumps. There is roadside and utility right-of-way
habitat along West Boulevard and Horseshoe Lane.
The areas on site with disturbed, mixed pine/hardwood forest are somewhat
fragmented and on the lower slopes and stream corridors. Other areas are
covered by younger, early successional trees and shrubs dominated by with
exotic invasive species. The average diameter at breast height (DBH) for the
canopy trees is 10 inches, with some larger trees present. Canopy species
include Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), Short -leaf Pine (P. echinata), Virginia Pine
(P. virginiana), White Oak (Quercus alba), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red
Oak (Q. falcata), Willow Oak (Q. phellos), Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata),
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip
Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and White Ash (Fraxinus americana).
Subcanopy species present are Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Redbud (Cercis
canadensis), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), Red Maple (Acer rubra), Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida), Red
Mulberry (Morus rubra) and American Holly (Ilex opaca). Invasive small trees
are present, namely Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and Mimosa (Albizia
julibrissin). Shrubs present are Blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), Strawberry Bush
(Euonymus americanus), Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), Russian Olive
(Elaeagnus umbellata), and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). The herb layer
includes Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Spotted Wintergreen
(Chimaphila maculata), Wild Ginger (Hexastylis arifolia), Running Pine
(Diphastiastrum digitatum), Bedstraw (Galium sp.), and Japanese Stiltgrass
(Microstegium vimineum). Vines present are Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), Catbrier (Smilax sp.), Trumpet Creeper (Campsis radicans), Virginia
Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and
Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
The old roads and semi open areas with remnants of past site use, including
rubble dumps, trash piles, old tires, gravel and old asphalt, are covered in a
mixed shrub/herb/vine complex dominated by Winged Sumac (Rhus copallina),
Blackberry (Rubus spp.), Serecia Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Fescue
(Festuca sp.), Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), Dog fennel (Eupatorium spp.),
Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), Wisteria (Wisteria sinensis), and Porcelain
Berry (Ampelopsis glandulosa var. brevipedunculata).
The roadsides and power line rights-of-way along West Boulevard and Horsehoe
Lane have mowed Fescue (Festuca sp.) shoulders. The narrow transitional
ecotone at the woods edges are made up Serecia Lespedeza, Broomsedge
(Andropogon virginica), Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Blackberry and Multiflora
Rose (Rosa multiflora).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Ahport South -- Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Endangered/Protected Species Results
• Although potential habitat exists for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's
Sumac and Smooth Coneflower along the roadside corridors, field and
woods edges, examination of these areas revealed no occurrences on-
site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
• The streams on site do not have the characteristics to support Carolina
Heelsplitters. Based on existing documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter
populations have not been previously identified in this basin.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.aov/asheville/htmis/proiect review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the northern
long eared bat.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend further consultation with you and your project planners and
engineers regarding coordination with USFWS and other federal and state
agencies if needed.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
August 9, 2017
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group.
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Airport South — Threatenecl /Enclangowl /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and biologist and has conducted field work
and investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in both North and
South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997-1998. Organized,
directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000-2001. Organized, directed,
and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 40,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present.
• Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally
Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzh).
• Located and identified four previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heardeaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's
Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to
the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation
Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery
Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg,
Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.