20171045 Ver 1_Draft Mitigation Plan NOV 2018_20181105

ID#* 20171045
Select Reviewer:*
Mac Haupt
Mitigation Project Submittal -11/5/2018
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Paul Wiesner
Project Information
Existing 20171045
(DWR) (nurrbers only no dash)
I D#: *
Project Name: Key Mill Site - DMS#100025
County: Surry
Document Information
O Yes a No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing 1
Version: (nurrbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plan
File Upload: Key Mill_100025_Draft MP_Nov 2018.pdf 28.83MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Paul Wiesner
Signature:*

MITIGATION PLAN 
Draft for IRT Review 

October 2018 
KEY MILL MITIGATION SITE 
Surry County, NC 
NCDEQ Contract No. 7180 
DMS ID No. 100025 

Yadkin River Basin 
HUC 03040101  

USACE Action ID No. SAW‐2017‐01504 
RFP #: 16‐006993 

PREPARED FOR: 

NC Department of Environmental Quality 
Division of Mitigation Services 
1652 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC 27699‐1652 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.    phone 704‐332‐7754    fax 704‐332‐3306    1430 S. Mint Street, # 104    Charlotte, NC  28203 

October 31, 2018 

Mr. Matthew Reid 
NCDENR ‐ Division of Mitigation Services 
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102 
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 

RE: Response to Draft Mitigation Plan Comments 
Key Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County 
Yadkin River Basin: 03040101 
DEQ Contract No. 7180 
DMS ID No. 100025 

Dear Mr. Reid, 
We have reviewed the comments on the Draft Mitigation Plan for the above‐referenced project dated 
October 8, 2018 and have revised the Mitigation Plan and construction plan set based on these 
comments. Wildlands is submitting the revised documents with this letter as an interim electronic 
deliverable for DMS review. Below are responses to each of your comments.  
MITIGATION PLAN COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 
General 
Please include post contract site visit memo dated August 14, 2017 in appendix with final submittal. 
The post‐contract site visit memorandum is enclosed in Appendix 5. 
Introduction 
Fourth paragraph indicates the site will generate 6,038 SMUs. The total credits shown in Table 23: 
Project Asset Table is 6,106. Please verify and update where necessary.  
Thank you for identifying this discrepancy. 6,038 is the number of stream restoration 
credits that will be generated at this site. The site will generate an additional 68 
restoration equivalents for a total of 6,106 SMUs. Wildlands has updated the mitigation 
plan and associated tables to reflect 6,106 SMUs. 
Page 7 
Bull Creek: Streambed deposition and bed deposition is referenced. Does WEI mean sediment 
deposition, and if so, what is the size approximate distribution? Does WEI intend to note that sediment 
is filling pools?  
Wildland documented bank erosion along more than 50% of the designated restoration 
reaches of Bull Creek. Sloughing, eroding, and otherwise failing banks are contributing 
sediment to the stream. Wildlands did not observe bank erosion upstream of the project 
area or within the proposed preservation reach. Bank erosion along the restoration 

Page 2 of 5 

reaches will be addressed via the proposed activities. Wildlands is proposing to address 
bank erosion along the enhancement reaches through cattle exclusion and EII activities. 
Page 7 has been revised and the relevant section is included below for reference.  
Bull Creek includes five reaches (1A, 1B, 2, 3, and 4). Prior to entering 
the Site, Bull Creek flows through a mature forest and the stream 
appears to be transporting the sediment supplied (i.e., sediment 
deposition is not apparent immediately upstream of the project 
boundary). Incision and bank erosion and failure was observed as Bull 
Creek enters the Site and documented along a majority (greater than 
50%) of the designated restoration reaches of Bull Creek. Sediment 
deposition in the form of mid‐channel bars and shallow pools is 
apparent throughout the restoration reaches due to localized bank 
erosion within the project area. Active scour and undercutting 
jeopardize the stability of the trees present on the top of bank. 
Reach 3: “Depositional features including mid‐channel bars are present within this reach and the riffles 
are short and pools are shallow, filled with fine deposits.” For clarification, is WEI indicating that excess 
fine sediment (<2mm) is depositing in pools and coarse sediment is depositing in the medial bars? 
Wildlands observed mid‐channel bars and deposition along Reach 3, but Wildlands did 
not specifically characterize the grain size distribution at observed mid‐channel bars or 
within the existing pools. Wildlands attributes the depositional features to excess 
sediment from failing/failed banks and over‐widened channels. 
Page 8 
Last paragraph in UT2 section describes UT2 as intermittent from origin to confluence with UT2. This 
should likely be the confluence with UT2A. Please verify and update.  
Thank you for identifying this error. The sentence has been updated to reflect the correct 
reach names. 
Table 4 
With the amount of bank erosion and sediment deposition within incised channels, are these channels 
still degrading as indicated by the III/IV evolutionary stage? The reach information provided by WEI 
describes channels dominated by sediment sourced from bank erosion in excess of the transport 
thresholds (that is, pool filling, mid channel bars). WEI states some areas are still degrading, but where?  
Bedrock seams vertically control Bull Creek, but Wildlands observed active toe erosion 
and bank sloughing. The evolutionary stage has been revised to reflect Class IV/V 
observations. 
Page 13, Table 5 
Second note indicates a PJD was requested. As stated in the note, please include the approved PJD 
packet with final submittal.  
The Preliminary JD dated October 17, 2018, is enclosed in Appendix 2. 

Page 3 of 5 

Table 9 
Please clarify how UT Catawba R1 (E5) is used as a reference for C3 design criteria for Bull Creek Reach 
1A and 1B? Most of the proposed design parameters are far removed from the UT Catawba parameters. 
Same question for UT2C. Also, please check the velocity calculations for the high slope tributaries (UT1B, 
UT1C, UT2 and UT2A). The bankfull velocities seem low given some of these slopes. Is it expected that 
the step pool spacing will reduce velocities to this degree? Is the proposed slope for UT2 actually 6.8%, 
or is that an error? Please adjust and/or respond as appropriate.  
Catawba R1 is a flat E5 channel with a similar drainage area as compared to Bull Creek Reach 
1A. This reference site was utilized to support the designated design discharge (i.e., discharge 
analysis). The design discharge for Bull Creek Reach 1A (and 1B) is within 12% of the Catawba R1 
reach. The report has been updated to clarify the purpose of Catawba R1. The physical 
parameters for the Box Creek reference site were utilized for the designated Bull Creek 
restoration reaches. 
The physical characteristics of Catawba R1 (and UT to Sandy Run) are supported by mature 
vegetation which reinforces the bank and provides resistance to flow, allowing for steeper banks 
and lower width‐to‐depth ratios. Restored stream systems are vulnerable after construction, and 
the banks lack flow resistance due to limited or immature vegetation. As such, we are not able to 
design solely based on reference parameters but have to design a stable C channel with a higher 
width‐to‐depth (for example) that we expect to evolve into an E stream type over time. 
Wildlands calculated velocities with the Manning’s equation and a roughness coefficient of 0.05.  
Wildlands listed the proposed slope for UT2 as 6.8%. That value is an error. The proposed slope is 
5.8%. This reduction in slope reduces the calculated velocity. Wildlands updated Table 12. 
Page 26 
Statement regarding reaches with excess shear stress: why is WEI constructing channels with excess 
shear stress, and then using the information to design rock and wood step structures to avoid 
aggradation? If the conditions provide excess shear stress, why would there be a concern for 
aggradation? Wouldn’t degradation be the dominant process? Please clarify this statement?  
Wildlands revised the mitigation plan and removed the reference to ‘excess’. Sediment 
transport is a component of natural channel design, and our channels are sized to 
transport the existing bed material as bedload. Wildlands designated riffle material and 
structures (wood and rock) along stream reaches to prevent downcutting. The channels 
have been sized to support sediment transport and to prevent aggradation.  
Page 27‐28 
For the very steep reaches within the project will log grade control be adequate for the long term? With 
slopes ranging from 4 to 7% it seems like stone grade control might be advisable. UT2A would be better 
described as a PIII restoration. Any of the streams with steep valleys and side slopes with a B stream 
target are probably more accurately described as PIII restoration approaches unless the bed will be 
raised to some significant degree.  
Log grade control will be adequate where consistent base flow is present (i.e., perennial 
channels). Boulders have been implemented along the intermittent reaches (i.e., UT2, UT3A). The 
stream channel is not being relocated to a higher elevation, but these activities will create a new, 
stable stream and floodplain near the existing  

Page 4 of 5 

UT2A restoration includes manipulation of the channel cross‐section characteristics, profile, and 
alignment. The activities along this reach align with the objectives of Priority 2 restoration 
through the creation of a new, stable stream and floodplain through the excavation of a new 
floodplain and stream channel. It is our understanding that Priority 3 restoration is similar to 
Priority 2 in its objective to widen the floodplain but typically includes no to limited modifications 
to the channel. Due to the manipulation of the channel cross‐section characteristics, profile, and 
alignment along UT2A the Priority 2 designation was maintained. 
Table 19 
Reduce sediment and nutrient input goal: If not measured, do not include. How does WEI propose to 
conduct a visual assessment to see nutrient removal? Nutrients could easily be modeled to include an 
estimate, then the success of the buffer could be a surrogate for the nutrient removal since the model 
uses buffer as one of the inputs.  
The row associated with the sediment and nutrient input goal has been removed. This goal is 
expected but will not be specifically monitored. 
Figure 9 
Please show the pressure transducer location on Figure 9 for UT2A as discussed in section 8.1.5 
Hydrology. Update Table 20 to account for this gauge.  
The comment references UT2A, but it should reference UT2 which is the intermittent stream. 
Figure 9 and Table 20 were updated to illustrate a pressure gage to document stream flow. 
Table 20 
Please indicate which type of gage (CG or SG) is being used on the individual reaches.  
Table 20 was updated to reflect the gage type. 
Appendix 8, Maintenance Plan 
Please add beaver control to maintenance plan.  
A section was added to the Appendix to cover beaver control/wildlife management. 
Plan Sheets 
For some of the smaller tributaries it is difficult to make out the structures proposed for the outer 
meander bends (e.g. UT2A – assuming these are brush toe? – yes?). Given how narrow these structures 
are depicted, it is just difficult to pick out the structure type from the legend. Please just confirm which 
structure type this is.  
The brush toe symbol (hatch) has been widened by 1 foot on all tributary reaches. Log 
sills were scaled on all tributaries to increase visibility.  
The LOD is does not seem to be included in the grading plan sheets.  
The Limit of Disturbance (LOD) boundary has been included and illustrated in the plans. 

Page 5 of 5 

We sincerely appreciate the thorough review of the draft mitigation plan prior to our submittal to the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. The comments above have been incorporated into 
this revised electronic submittal. Please let me us know when the document is ready for submittal to the 
USACE and let me know if we can facilitate. 
Sincerely, 

Aaron S. Earley, PE, CFM 

DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN 
KEY MILL MITIGATION SITE 
Surry County, NC 
NCDEQ Contract No. 7180 
DMS ID No. 100025 
Yadkin River Basin 
HUC 03040101  
USACE Action ID No. SAW 2017‐01504 
PREPARED FOR: 

NC Department of Environmental Quality 
Division of Mitigation Services 
1652 Mail Service Center 
Raleigh, NC  27699‐1652 
PREPARED BY: 

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 
Charlotte, NC 28203 
Phone: (704) 332‐7754 

This Mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following: 
 Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2) 
through (c)(14). 
 NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In‐Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010. 
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory 
mitigation. 
Contributing Staff: 
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM, Engineer of Record and 
Project Manager 
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge 
Ian Eckardt, PWS, Wetland Delineation 
Win Taylor, PWS, Wetland Delineation and PCN 

Daniel Johnson, MBA, PE, PH Quality Assurance 
Jeff Keaton, Independent Quality Check 
Michael Clark, EI, Design & Construction Documents 
Brian Blake, EI, Design & Construction Documents 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page i October 2018 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection .................................................................................... 1 
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions ............................................................................................... 2 
3.1 Landscape Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 2 
3.2  Land Use/Land Cover .................................................................................................................... 3 
3.3 Existing Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 3 
3.4  Project Resources ......................................................................................................................... 4 
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential ........................................................................................................ 9 
4.1  Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................... 9 
4.2  Overall Functional Uplift Potential ............................................................................................. 10 
4.3  Site Constraints to Functional Uplift ........................................................................................... 10 
5.0 Regulatory Considerations ...................................................................................................... 11 
5.1  Biological and Cultural Resources............................................................................................... 11 
5.2  FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass ............................................................. 11 
5.3  401/404 ...................................................................................................................................... 12 
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................... 12 
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan ............................................................................ 14 
7.1  Design Approach Overview ........................................................................................................ 14 
7.2 Reference Streams ...................................................................................................................... 14 
7.3  Design Channel Morphological Parameters ............................................................................... 16 
7.4  Design Discharge Analysis ........................................................................................................... 20 
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis ...................................................................................................... 21 
7.6  Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 23 
7.7 Vegetation and Planting Plan ..................................................................................................... 26 
7.8  Project Risk and Uncertainties .................................................................................................... 26 
8.0 Performance Standards ........................................................................................................... 26 
8.1 Streams ....................................................................................................................................... 27 
8.2 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 27 
8.3  Visual Assessments ..................................................................................................................... 27 
9.0 Monitoring Plan ...................................................................................................................... 28 
9.1 Monitoring Components ............................................................................................................ 28 
10.0 Long‐Term Management Plan ................................................................................................. 33 
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan .................................................................................................... 33 
12.0 Determination of Credits ......................................................................................................... 34 
13.0 References .............................................................................................................................. 36 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page ii October 2018 
TABLES 
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1 – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................................................ 1 
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2 – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................................................ 2 
Table 3: Project Soil Types – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................................................................... 3 
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 3 – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................................................ 8 
Table 5: Project Attribute Table Part 4 – Key Mill Mitigation Site ............................................................. 11 
Table 6: Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands – Key Mill Mitigation Site .............................................. 12 
Table 7: Mitigation Goals and Objectives – Key Mill Mitigation Site .......................................................... 13 
Table 8: Stream Reference Data: Key Mill Mitigation Site .......................................................................... 15 
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site............................. 17 
Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site .......................... 17 
Table 11: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT1B and UT1C – Key Mill Mitigation Site .................. 18 
Table 12: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT2 and UT2A – Key Mill Mitigation Site .................... 18 
Table 13: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT2B and UT2C – Key Mill Mitigation Site .................. 19 
Table 14: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT3B and UT3C – Key Mill Mitigation Site .................. 19 
Table 15: Summary of Bull Creek Design Discharge Analysis – Key Mill Mitigation Site ............................ 21 
Table 16: Summary of Tributary Design Discharge Analysis – Key Mill Mitigation Site ............................. 21 
Table 17: Sediment Transport Competency Analysis Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site ....................... 23 
Table 18: Sediment Transport Competency Analysis Tributaries – Key Mill Mitigation Site ...................... 23 
Table 19: Monitoring Plan – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................................................................. 29 
Table 20: Monitoring Components Restoration Reaches – Key Mill Mitigation Site ................................. 30 
Table 21: Monitoring Components Enhancement | Preservation Reaches – Key Mill Mitigation Site ...... 32 
Table 22: Long‐term Management Plan – Key Mill Mitigation Site ............................................................ 3 3 
Table 23: Project Asset Table ‐ Key Mill Mitigation Site ............................................................................. 35 

FIGURES 
Figure 1   Vicinity Map 
Figure 2   Site Map 
Figure 3   Watershed Map 
Figure 4   USGS Topographic Map 
Figure 5    Soils Map 
Figure 6  Concept Design Map 
Figure 7   Reference Reach Vicinity Map 
Figure 8    Discharge Analysis 
Figure 9    Proposed Monitoring Plan 

APPENDICES 
Appendix 1 Historical Aerial Photos 
Appendix 2  Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination 
Appendix 3  DWR Stream Identification Forms 
Appendix 4 Existing, Proposed, and Reference Reach Geomorphic Data  
Appendix 5 Categorical Exclusion and Resource Agency Correspondence  
Appendix 6  Invasive Species Plan 
Appendix 7  Site Protection Instrument 
Appendix 8  Maintenance Plan 
Appendix 9  Financial Assurance 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 1 October 2018 
1.0 Introduction 
The Key Mill Mitigation Site (Site) is in Surry County approximately 7.2 miles south of the City of Mount 
Airy and approximately 29 miles northwest of the City of Winston‐Salem, NC (Figure 1). The Site is within 
the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) targeted watershed for the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic 
Unit Code (HUC) 03040101110040 and the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Sub‐basin 03‐07‐03 
and will provide stream mitigation units (SMUs) in the Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101 (Yadkin 01).  

The Site is located on one parcel, bisected by Key Road. The Site is predominantly actively grazed 
pasture with the downstream extent of the Site forested. Bull Creek is the primary stream which flows 
southeast through the center of the Site. Five unnamed tributaries (UT1A‐C, UT2, UT2A‐C, UT3, and 
UT3A‐C) join Bull Creek within the Site limits (Figure 2). Downstream of the Site, Bull Creek continues 
southeast to join the Ararat River near the Cedar Hill community.  
Valleys throughout the Site have moderately steep walls with alluvial bottoms. Valleys narrow and 
become colluvial towards the upstream extents of UT2, UT2A, UT3, and UT3A. On January 6, 2017, Bull 
Creek, UT1A‐C, UT2A‐C, and the majority of UT3A‐C were identified as perennial within the project 
limits. UT2, UT3, and the upstream extent of UT3A within the project limits were identified as 
intermittent.  
This project will improve water quality and ecology through riparian buffer establishment, stream 
restoration, and exclusion of livestock and farm equipment from aquatic resources. These activities will 
result in a decrease in nutrient and sediment loads from the project site and improved aquatic and 
terrestrial habitat onsite. Additionally, this Site connects forested lands upstream and downstream, 
providing a continuous wooded corridor for wildlife. The Site includes a combination of stream 
restoration, enhancement level II, and preservation and is expected to generate 6,106 Cool stream 
mitigation units (SMUs). A stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP) will also be installed to treat 
concentrated pasture drainage downstream of Key Road, but no direct mitigation credits are proposed 
for this feature. 
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1 – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Project Information 
Project Name  Key Mill Mitigation Site 
County Surry 
Project Area / Easement Area (acres) 20.81 
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36° 23' 53.80"N     80° 36' 14.20"W 
Planted Acreage (acres of woody stems planted) 16.6 
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection 
The Site was selected based on its potential to support the objectives and goals of multiple conservation 
and watershed planning documents, outlined below. 
 The Bull Creek watershed is included in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee‐Dee River Basin Restoration 
Priorities (RBRP). The RBRP lists major stressors in the basin as naturally erodible soils, sediment 
and erosion from land‐disturbing activities, and excessive stormwater flow off impervious 
surfaces. Additionally, the RBRP lists nonexistent or degraded riparian buffers along stream 
channels are a significant contributing factor to the habitat degradation and water quality 
impairment noted within the Yadkin River Headwaters. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 2 October 2018 
 The RBRP outlined general goals of restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat on impaired 
streams in the watershed, and implementation of agricultural BMPs to limit sediment and 
nutrient input from active farming operations. 
 The 2015 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission’s (NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) 
notes that habitat loss, excessive sedimentation, and wastewater discharges from urban 
development and agricultural operations are widespread problems within the Yadkin Pee‐Dee 
River basin. The WAP discusses the importance of habitat conservation and restoration to 
address current problems affecting species and habitats. 
The project will directly and indirectly address stressors identified in the RBRP and the WAP by excluding 
livestock, stabilizing stream banks, restoring a forested riparian buffer, and preserving existing forested 
buffers. These actions will reduce fecal, nutrient, and sediment inputs to project streams, and ultimately 
to the Ararat River, as well as reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on the Site. Restoration of the 
Site is directly in line with recommended management strategies outlined in the RBRP. 
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions 
The Site watershed (Figure 3) is in the southeastern portion of the Yadkin 01 in Surry County, North 
Carolina. The following sections describe the existing conditions of the Site, watershed, and watershed 
processes, including disturbance and response. 
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2 – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
3.1 Landscape Characteristics 
3.1.1 Physiography and Topography 
The Site is in the Smith River Allochthon of the Piedmont physiographic province. The Piedmont 
Province is characterized by rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges, with elevations ranging from 
300 to 1500 feet above sea level. The Site topography and relief are typical for the region, as illustrated 
in Figure 4. Bull Creek bisects the Site and several unnamed tributaries are included in the project area.  
3.1.2 Geology and Soils 
The Smith River Allochthon is composed of metamorphic rocks and bound by thrust faults. The North 
Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS) maps the underlying geology of the Site as Late Proterozoic‐Cambrian 
Project Watershed Summary Information 
Physiographic Province Piedmont 
Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont 
River Basin Yadkin River 
USGS HUC (8 digit, 14 digit) 03040101, 03040101110040 
NCDWR Sub‐basin 03‐07‐03 
Project Drainage Area (acres) 1,146 (Bull Creek – Reach 1A, 1B, &2); 1,293 (Bull Creek – Reach 3 & 4);  
102 (UT1A‐C); 32 (UT2A‐C); 6 (UT2), 45 (UT3 & UT3A‐‐C) 
Project Drainage Area 
Percentage of Impervious Area 1% (Bull Creek East) 
2011 NLCD Land Use 
Classification Bull Creek UT1A‐C UT2A‐C UT2 UT3/UT3A‐C 
Forest 58% 70% 32% 55% 22% 
Cultivated 33% 21% 49% 45% 74% 
Urban  9%  9% 19%  ‐‐‐ 4% 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 3 October 2018 
(500 to 900 million years in age) banded gneiss (CZbb). The unit is described as interlayered with calc‐
silicate rock, metaconglomerate, amphibolite, sillimanite‐mica schist, and granitic rock (NCGS, 2016). 
Instances of exposed bedrock along project channels are mapped in the plan sheets.  
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Surry County (USDA‐NRCS, 2018). Project 
area soils are described below in Table 3 and illustrated on Figure 5. 
Table 3: Project Soil Types – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Soil Name Description 
Arkaqua loam, 0 to 2 percent 
slopes, frequently flooded 
These soils are located on floodplains of foothill valleys with nearly level 
slopes of 0‐2%. They are very deep soils and somewhat poorly drained. The 
profile consists of a loam surface layer and clay loam subsoil. 
Colvard and Suches soils, 0 to 3 
percent slopes, occasionally 
flooded 
Composition is about 49% Colvard, 39% Suches, and 12% dissimilar 
inclusions. Colvard soils are very deep and well drained with a fine sandy 
loam surface layer and fine sandy loam underlying material. Suches soils are 
very deep and well drained with a loam surface layer and clay loam subsoil. 
These soils are located on floodplains of foothill valleys with nearly level 
slopes of 0‐3%. 
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to 
25 percent slopes, moderately 
eroded 
These soils are located on ridges and low hills in the Piedmont uplands. The 
profile consists of a sandy clay loam surface layer and clay to loam subsoil. 
They are very deep soils that are well drained with slopes of 15‐25%. 
Fairview‐Scott Knob complex, 
25 to 45 percent slopes 
This series consists of about 60% Fairview, 28% Scott Knob, and 12% 
dissimilar inclusions. These soils are located on ridges and low hills on 
Piedmont uplands with 25‐45% slopes. Fairview soils are very deep and well 
drained with a fine sandy loam surface layer and clay to loam subsoil. Scott 
Knob soils are moderately deep and well drained with fine sandy loam on 
the surface and sandy clay loam subsoil. 

3.2 Land Use/Land Cover 
Land use and land cover, both past and present, were investigated throughout the Site and the 
watershed using historical aerials from 1966‐2016 (Appendix 1) and a watershed reconnaissance survey. 
Since 1966, aerial imagery suggests that the Site has primarily been used for agriculture. Lands upstream 
and downstream of the Site are predominantly forested though there are some areas of agricultural 
lands and small residential areas within the watershed, along Siloam road. The rural location of the 
project and small percentage of impervious areas (residential development and roads relative to 
forested and cultivated) suggest a stable watershed. 
Key Road bisects Bull Creek within the project area. Between 1966 and 1976, Key Road was realigned. 
The new alignment shifted Key Road to the west, increasing the amount of agricultural land on the 
eastern side of Key Road. Row crops are visible on the 1993 aerial photo in the project area west of the 
road. Presently, most of the property is used for cattle grazing and hay production. 
Within the project, the property owner’s ancestors constructed a mill and dam upstream of Key Road. It 
has since been breached, though portions of the foundation and stone and timber structural features 
remain.  
3.3 Existing Vegetation 
Bull Creek Reach 1A, 1B, and 2 contain a diverse riparian forest on the right hillslope. Catawba 
rhododendron (Rhododendron catawbiense) is heavily present, along with a mature canopy of various 
stages of oak species, such as post oak (Quercus stellate), white oak (Quercus alba), and northern red 
oak (Quercus rubra). Other mature hardwoods include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), umbrella 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 4 October 2018 
magnolia (Magnolia tripetala), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The 
understory consists of flowering dogwood (Cornus flordia), American witch hazel (Hamamelis 
virginiana), American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), and young 
sassafras (Sassafras albidum). The left floodplain of Bull Creek Reach 1B and 2 contains a pasture 
beyond the narrow riparian buffer that contains black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), large sycamore 
(Platanus occidentalis), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). The herbaceous cover contains 
goldenrod (Solidago sp.), deer tongue grass (Dichanthelium clandestinum), multiflora rose (Rosa 
multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), various asters (Symphyotrichum spp.), Japanese 
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), yellow crownbeard (Verbesina occidentalis), and pasture fescue 
(Festuca sp.). Below the Bull Creek and UT1 confluence, tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and Chinese 
privet exist.  
The upstream portion of Bull Creek Reach 3 does not contain any canopy coverage but there is large 
mature Chinese privet on the right floodplain just below the culvert. This section of stream is primarily 
surrounded by pasture that contains fescue, multiflora rose, soft rush (Juncus effussus), dogfennel 
(Eupatorium capillifolium), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), jimson weed (Datura stramonium), and spiny 
amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus). Further up the left floodplain is a small Harlequin glory bower 
(Clerodendrum trichotomum) population. Species composition within the downstream extent of Reach 3 
and Reach 4 is similar to the intact forest along Reach 1 and 2. The understory within the forested 
restoration Reach 3 is heavily inundated with Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle. 
UT1A has limited canopy coverage consisting of tag alder (Alnus serrulata), the invasive Mimosa (Albizia 
julibrissin), the invasive Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana), river birch (Betula nigra), and black walnut 
(Juglans nigra). Canopy within UT1B & C consists of tulip poplar and red maple with the understory 
dominated by mature Chinese privet.    
While the UT2 reaches begin within an intact forested area, the majority of this reach is open pasture 
with limited canopy coverage from green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and red maple. The limited 
understory is dominated by Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and Chinese privet. Herbaceous 
plants include soft rush, sedge (Carex sp.), and pasture fescue.  
The upstream extent of the UT3 reaches contain a mature canopy of white oak, northern red oak, 
sourwood (Oxydendrum arboretum), tulip poplar, pignut hickory (Carya glabra), shortleaf pine (Pinus 
echinate) and red maple. The understory is sparse and open with occasional Eastern red cedar, 
flowering dogwood, and Chinese privet. Very few herbaceous species are present and primarily consist 
of sporadic yellow crownbeard and Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum). Reaches UT3B & C are 
primarily surrounded by open pasture. 
3.4 Project Resources 
Wildlands investigated on‐site jurisdictional Waters of the United States (US) within the proposed 
project area. Potential jurisdictional areas were delineated using the US Army Corps of Engineers 
(USACE) Routine On‐Site Determination Method. This method is defined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers 
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the subsequent Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional 
Supplement. Streams were classified using North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) 
Classification Forms. Wetland determination forms representative of on‐site jurisdictional areas as well 
as non‐jurisdictional upland areas are included in Appendix 2.  
The results of the on‐site investigation include six jurisdictional stream channels [Bull Creek (Reach 1A, 
1B, 2, 3, & 4), UT1A‐C, UT2, UT2A‐C, UT3, and UT3A‐C] and six wetlands (A‐F). The wetland delineation 
was confirmed on Site by USACE staff on July 25, 2018.  These jurisdictional features are discussed below 
by their location within the Site and are illustrated in Figure 2. NCDWR stream identification forms are in 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 5 October 2018 
Appendix 3. Table 4 provides a summary of water resources within the project limits. Reach specific 
cross‐sections and geomorphic summaries are provided in Appendix 4.  
Bull Creek 
 Bull Creek includes five reaches (1A, 1B, 2, 3, and 
4). Prior to entering the Site, Bull Creek flows 
through a mature forest and the stream appears 
to be transporting the sediment supplied (i.e., 
sediment deposition is not apparent immediately 
upstream of the project boundary). Incision and 
bank erosion and failure was observed as Bull 
Creek enters the Site and documented along a 
majority (greater than 50%) of the designated 
restoration reaches of Bull Creek. Sediment 
deposition in the form of mid‐channel bars and 
shallow pools is apparent throughout the 
restoration reaches due to localized bank erosion 
within the project area. Active scour and 
undercutting jeopardize the stability of the trees present on the top of bank.  
Reach 1A enters the Site from the west as a perennial stream. The valley at the upstream extent is 
confined but gently sloping, 1.0%. Bull Creek Reach 1B begins several hundred feet below the upstream 
extent of the project where the valley becomes wider, the stream becomes confined along the right 
valley toe, and the left floodplain land use transitions to open, actively grazed pasture. In this area, there 
is an old barbed wire fence that previously prohibited cattle access to the stream. The fence has not 
been maintained allowing cattle full access to Bull Creek as evidenced by a path along the left top of 
bank with regular trails down to Bull Creek. Valley slopes increase going downstream with a slope of 
2.7% along Bull Creek Reach 2. Bank height ratios range from 3.7 to 4.1 with width to depth ratios of 
14.1 to 16.8, indicating severe incision. Bull Creek has cut down to the bedrock layer and bedrock seams 
are exposed along the stream bed at regular intervals within these upper reaches. Riffles are present 
along the bedrock seams and pools are shallow and created by backwater as opposed to scour. Bedrock 
exposure is also common along the right toe of slope due to the location of the creek along the right 
valley toe. Bank erosion along these reaches consistently alternates between the left and right bank. 
Bed material along this reach consists of gravel, cobble, small boulders, and fines from bank erosion. 
Riffle cross‐sections (XS1 and XS3) from these reaches classify the stream as a Rosgen F3.  
Just upstream of Key Road, the concrete footers and stacked stone remnants of an old mill dam remain 
along the creek banks as well as timbers in the creek. The dam was hand stacked by a Key family 
ancestor. To avoid impacting this historical structure and to not restrict future activities associated with 
this structure, no restoration activities will occur within this reach. However, this area will be fenced to 
exclude livestock from accessing the stream except during times in which cattle are moved between 
pastures. The stream flows under Key Road crossing through two 60‐inch corrugated metal pipes.  
Downstream of Key Road, Bull Creek Reach 3 flows through the center of an open pasture with active 
cattle access. The banks of this reach are extensively trampled by cattle. Bank erosion is persistent, and 
in many areas, the banks have slumped due to rotational failure. The valley is wider and gently sloping, 
<1.0%. Reach 3 bank heights are lower, but the stream remains somewhat incised with bank height 
ratios ranging from 1.9 to 2.8 and width to depth ratios of 8.5 to 22.5. The stream has historically moved 
around the floodplain, evidenced by two abandoned stream channels that are present in the left 
floodplain. Depositional features including mid‐channel bars are present within this reach and the riffles 
Incised and Eroding (Bull Creek Reach 1B) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 6 October 2018 
are short and pools are shallow, filled with fine deposits. The stream continues in this condition to a 
fence line which separates the pasture from the downstream wooded area. Bull Creek Reach 3 within 
the woods remains incised and bank erosion is prevalent along the left toe of slope due to the location 
of the creek along the left valley toe. Riffle cross‐sections (XS4, XS5, XS7, and XS8) from this reach 
classify the stream as a Rosgen F3/G3c.  
Bull Creek Reach 4 within the downstream extent of the Site begins as the stream meanders back to the 
central floodplain valley. Reach 4 is entirely forested with stable banks and appropriate geomorphology.  
UT1 
UT1A originates as a perennial stream outside of 
the conservation easement. Upstream of the Site, 
above Loblolly Lane, the stream is in good 
condition with stable banks, excellent pattern and 
bedform, and abundant habitat. UT1A enters the 
Site under a fence separating forest from cattle 
pasture. This reach contains limited riparian 
buffers, areas of bank erosion, and a grass road is 
present in the left floodplain. An existing 24” 
reinforced concrete pipe culvert crossing is present 
approximately 100 LF downstream of the Site 
boundary. A sediment bar upstream of the culvert 
crossing suggests that the culvert is clogged and 
serves as a sediment transport barrier in its current condition. Additionally, the culvert is perched 
downstream of the crossing. The grass farm road crosses the culvert and parallels UT1A on the right 
floodplain through the field before turning upslope.  
Downstream of UT1A, the stream becomes incised as it transitions to reach UT1B and UT1C. The valley 
slope along UT1B is 2.4% and increases to 3.7% as it transitions to UT1C. Bank height ratios range from 
5.0 to 7.9 with width depth ratios of 7.3 to 8.1. The right floodplain is wide and flat, but the channel 
follows the left valley toe. The stream’s location in the valley and the presence of an old spoil berm 
along the right bank indicate historic relocation of the channel. Cattle have full access to the channel 
and the banks are trampled and unstable. An additional damaged culvert crossing is located within this 
lower reach. Riffle cross‐sections (XS14 and XS15) from these reaches classify the stream as a Rosgen 
G4c and G4. 
UT2 
The UT2 project reach includes four reaches (UT2, 
UT2A, UT2B, and UT2C). These systems originate 
within a wooded area immediately upstream from 
the property boundary. A sporadic, single line of 
mature trees are located along the top of banks 
which provides some shade to the stream, but 
many of these trees are in poor health. Except for 
the upper extent of UT2 and UT2A, cattle have full 
access to the entire length of these reaches as it 
flows through open pasture. The erosive effects of 
cattle access are evident.  
UT2 originates within the wooded area at an old 
spring box. UT2 is intermittent from its origin to its 
Incised & Eroding Channel (UT2B) 
Incised Channel (UT1B) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 7 October 2018 
confluence with UT2A within the pasture. The valley along UT2 is confined and steeply sloping, 6.4%. 
UT2A begins at the property boundary and is a perennial system. As UT2A crosses into the pasture, the 
stream becomes incised and eroded. The valley is moderately confined with a slope of 2.9%. UT2B 
begins at a proposed stream culvert crossing location and has a valley slope similar to UT2A (3.1%). The 
valley widens as transitions downstream towards Bull Creek and the valley slope decreases to 1.9%. 
Riffle and pool morphology are limited and the bedform is impaired by fines generated from the bank 
erosion. Riffle cross‐sections (XS12 and XS13) on reach UT2C classify the stream as a G5 stream type. 
Bank height ratios ranged from 1.4 to 1.9 with width to depth ratios ranging from 3.7 to 4.8.  
UT3 
UT3 stream reaches originate just downstream 
from a farm pond which is fenced to prevent cattle 
access. UT3 and UT3A comprise two separate 
channels which flow from the pond. UT3 and UT3A 
are intermittent before transitioning to perennial 
flow on reach UT3A. The upstream reaches (UT3, 
UT3A, and UT3B) have a valley that is more V‐
shaped and steeper slopes (3.6%), before 
transitioning to UT3C (1.6% valley slope) within 
the wide, flat floodplain of Bull Creek. The V‐
shaped valley along UT3 and UT3A is partially 
wooded before transitioning to pasture within the 
downstream extent. Cattle have access 
throughout the entire stream reach. UT3 and 
UT3A exhibit normal pattern with some development of benches despite areas of bank erosion and 
extensive impacts from cattle access. Within the V‐shaped valley, UT3B is deeply incised with extensive 
bank erosions resulting from vertical unstable banks. Within Bull Creek’s floodplain, UT3C is deeply 
incised. As UT3C approaches Bull Creek, the existing incised channel is adjacent to an abandoned 
channel meander bend. Riffle cross‐section (XS14 and XS15) data collected on this reach indicates bank 
height ratios of 2.7 to 3.8 and a width to depth ratios of 5.4 to 7.8. These reaches most closely classify as 
a Rosgen G5c and G5 stream types.  
Wetlands 
There are six wetlands (A – F) located within the project area which are best classified as seeps and 
bottomland hardwood forest wetland types. The features exhibit saturated soils and soils with low 
chroma matrix. Vegetation within the majority of the wetlands is significantly impaired due to livestock 
grazing and mowing. Wetlands A and B are depressional areas which are abandoned stream channel 
areas adjacent to Bull Creek and UT3. Wetland C is a depressional area within the floodplain of Bull 
Creek. Wetlands D, E, and F are small seeps that originate from the hillslope along UT1. Wetland 
activities are not proposed for this project.  

Eroding Channel (UT3B) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 8 October 2018 
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 3 – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Reach Summary Information 
Parameter Bull Creek 
Reach 1A 
Bull Creek 
Reach 1B 
Bull Creek 
Reach 2 
Bull Creek 
Reach 3 
Bull Creek 
Reach 4 
Existing Length of Reach (LF) 435 876 403 2,291 683 
Valley Confinement (confined, Confined to Moderately Confined Moderately Confined 
Existing Drainage Area (acres) 1,146 1,293  
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P  P  P  P P 
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C  C  C  C  C 
Stream 
Classification1 
Existing1 F3 F3 F3 F3/G3c ‐‐‐ 
Proposed C3 C3  C3b  C3 ‐‐‐ 
Evolutionary Trend (Simon)1 IV/V IV/V  IV/V IV/V VI 
FEMA Classification Outside SFHA 
Parameter UT1A UT1B UT1C 
Existing Length of Reach (LF) 866 188 332 
Valley Confinement (confined, Confined 
Existing Drainage Area (acres) 102 
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P  P  P 
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C  C  C 
Stream 
Classification1 
Existing1 ‐‐‐  G4c  G4 
Proposed ‐‐‐ B4 B4a 
Evolutionary Trend (Simon)1 III/IV  III/IV  III/IV 
FEMA Classification Outside SFHA 

Parameter UT2 UT2A UT2B UT2C 
Existing Length of Reach (LF) 61 349 299 223 
Valley Confinement (confined, Confined Moderately Confined 
Existing Drainage Area (acres) 6 32 
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral I  P  P  P 
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C  C  C  C 
Stream 
Classification1 
Existing1 G4 G5  G5c  G5 
Proposed B4 B4 C4b C4 
Evolutionary Trend (Simon)1 III/IV  III/IV  III/IV  III/IV 
FEMA Classification Outside SFHA 
Parameter UT3 UT3A UT3B UT3C 
Existing Length of Reach (LF) 21 249 414 296 
Valley Confinement (confined, 
moderately confined, unconfined) Confined Moderately Confined 
Existing Drainage Area (acres) 45 
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral I I/P  P  P 
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C  C  C  C 
Stream 
Classification1 
Existing1 ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  G5 G5c 
Proposed ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ B4 C4 
Evolutionary Trend (Simon)1 III/IV  III/IV  III/IV  III/IV 
FEMA Classification Outside SFHA 
1. The Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1994) and Simon Channel Evolution Model (Simon, 1989) is for natural streams. 
These channels have been heavily manipulated by man and therefore may not fit the classification category or channel 
evolution as described by these models. Results of the classification and model are provided for illustrative purposes only. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 9 October 2018 
Wetland Summary Information 
Parameter A  B  C  D  E  F 
Size of Wetland (acres)1 0.028 0.021 0.220 0.002 0.001 0.009 
Wetland Type (non‐riparian, riparian 
riverine or riparian non‐riverine) Riparian Riverine 
Mapped Soil Series Colvard & Suches Arkaqua 
Drainage Class Occasionally flooded / well 
drained 
Frequently flooded / somewhat 
poorly drained 
Soil Hydric Status No Yes 
Source of Hydrology Groundwater & stream 
baseflow Groundwater 
Restoration or enhancement method 
(hydrologic, vegetative, etc.) N/A 
1. Wetland areas are not proposed for restoration or enhancement credit. 
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential 
The potential for functional uplift is qualitatively described in this section using terminology from the 
Stream Functions Pyramid (Harman, 2012). The Stream Functions Pyramid describes a hierarchy of five 
stream functions, each of which supports the functions above it on the pyramid (and sometimes 
reinforces those below it). The five functions in order from bottom to top are hydrology, hydraulics, 
geomorphology, physicochemical, and biology. Neither the Stream Functions Pyramid nor the 
Quantification Tool are proposed to determine success of the Site. 
4.1 Hydrology 
As identified in Section 3.2, the watershed is stable and comprised predominately of cultivated lands 
(agriculture) and forested lands. The hydrology function is affected by land cover throughout the entire 
watershed and for this reason limited improvements to hydrology are expected and hydrology will not 
be monitored. 
4.1.1 Hydraulics 
All the reaches identified for restoration are hydraulically impaired and lack a consistent floodplain 
connection. Project streams continue to be affected by the historic channelization, confinement against 
the valley walls, and incision. Reconnecting the streams to the floodplain will reduce in‐channel shear 
stress (for large flow events) and provide the in‐stream relief needed to improve the hydraulic function 
of on‐site streams. The water table is expected to rise to meet the restored elevation of baseflow in the 
stream channel, which may result in pocket wetland formation in the restored valley bottom. These 
effects of the project amount to significant uplift for the hydraulics function.  
4.1.2 Channel Geomorphology 
The impaired on‐site streams are in in stage III through V of the Simon Channel Evolution Model due to 
historic impoundment (historic mill dam), channelization, incision, and on‐going bank erosion. 
Numerous reaches are actively eroding and contributing sediment and stressing Bull Creek and 
downstream receiving waters (2009 Upper Yadkin Pee‐dee River Basin Restoration Priorities). Bull Creek 
and its associated tributaries have isolated sections of well defined pool and riffle sequences and areas 
with bedform diversity. However, the bedform diversity is predominately poor due to cattel intrusion. 
Overall, the existing geomorphology function ranges from moderate in areas where bedform diversity 
has formed despite prior channelization, to very poor due to cattle intrusion. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 10 October 2018 
There is a significant opportunity to improve the geomorphologic function on the Site. The incision and 
bank erosion will be directly addressed via restoration and enhancement activities. Large woody debris 
(LWD) will be incorporated into the system via instream structures and bank revetments. A riparian 
buffer will be planted with native vegetation promoting long‐term geomorphic stability and function. 
Geomorphology is expected to improve significantly and will be monitored via topographic data 
collection and visual assessments. 
4.1.3 Physicochemical 
Upon execution of the project, the exclusion of cattle within the Site provides a great potential to 
improve the physicochemical functioning of the streams. A BMP will be installed at a point of 
concentrated agricultural input to reduce sediment, nutrient, and fecal coliform inputs from an adjacent 
farm field. A riparian buffer will be established within the conservation easement, reducing polluted 
runoff and erosion of nutrient‐rich bank sediments and eventually providing stream shading resulting in 
reduced water temperatures. Water will flow over instream structures, providing reaeration. The stream 
will be reconnected to its floodplain and adjacent riparian wetlands to provide storage and treatment of 
overbank flows, and streambank erosion will be greatly reduced, eliminating a source of sediment and 
nutrients. Time and development of a mature canopy will be required to realize the extent of 
physicochemical functional lift. Further, no water quality sampling has been conducted at the Site. For 
these reasons, physicochemical improvements will not be explicitly monitored for success, although 
visual observations will be documented, and these observations are expected to show that the Site is 
trending towards improved function. 
4.1.4 Biology 
There are no available biological data for the Site; however, the habitat conditions vary from poor in 
areas that are actively incising to moderate in reaches that exhibit more stable bedforms. Wildlands 
identified barriers to aquatic organism passage (i.e., the culvert at the upstream extent of UT1) and 
biological factors (i.e., adjacent fields) that provide little habitat value for terrestrial species. As such, 
there is opportunity to improve the instream and riparian habitat along the project reaches. Instream 
structures with a variety of rock and woody materials, pools of varying depths, and woody bank 
revetments will be added throughout the project to increase instream habitat diversity, and a riparian 
buffer will be planted which will eventually shade the stream and improve terrestrial habitat. Despite 
these immediate improvements, the biological response may be slow. The ultimate level of 
improvement in biology may not occur until after the completion of the seven‐year monitoring period. 
Due to the anticipated response lag, improvements in the biological community will not be specifically 
monitored but are expected. 
4.2 Overall Functional Uplift Potential 
Overall, the Site serves as an opportunity to provide functional lift to degraded resources, specifically 
through improving in‐stream hydraulics that will be seen throughout the Site with the stream 
restoration, to the improvements in geomorphology that will come with restoring streams that are 
suited to the valley types throughout the Site. Physicochemical and biological improvements are a likely 
result of the project. However, there is no existing basis for classifying the existing condition of these 
functions and the likely improvements will occur gradually after construction. Specific performance 
criteria and monitoring activities are identified in subsequent sections of this plan. 
4.3 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift 
Site constraints that could affect the proposed functional uplift have been eliminated to the extent 
practicable. The proposed easement boundary will allow for the development of stable pattern (and 
channel dimension) to promote functioning stream channels. Due to the immediate upstream forested 
land use the physicochemical and biological functions within the project streams have a great potential 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 11 October 2018 
for improvement. However, functional lift within the Site is limited by the watershed conditions beyond 
the project limits and upstream water quality. 
5.0 Regulatory Considerations 
Table 5, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site. These considerations are 
expanded upon in subsequent sections. 
Table 5: Project Attribute Table Part 4 – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Regulatory Considerations 
Parameters Applicable? Supporting Docs? 
Endangered Species Act Yes Appendix 5 
Historic Preservation Act Yes Appendix 5 
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A 
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A 
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes N/A1 
Water of the United States ‐ Section 404 Yes PCN2 
Water of the United States ‐ Section 401 Yes PCN1 
1. This project is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area. 
2. The PJD Request was submitted to the USACE in May 2018. The PCN will be provided to the IRT with the Final Mitigation Plan. 
5.1 Biological and Cultural Resources 
The Categorical Exclusion for the Key Mill Mitigation Site was approved on September 22, 2017. This 
document included investigation into the presence of threatened and endangered species on Site 
protected under The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as well as any historical resources protected 
under The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.  
Wildlands requested review and comment from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the NC 
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on July 24, 2017, regarding the results of the site investigation 
and the project’s potential impacts biological resources. NCWRC responded on August 11, 2017 and 
stated they “This project should not impact wild trout resources or other known significant aquatic 
resources.” The USFWS has not responded at this time. Since no response was received from the USFWS 
within a 30‐day time frame, a “no effect” determination is assumed correct and that no additional, 
relevant information is available for the Site. All correspondence and a list of Threatened and 
Endangered Species in Surry County is included in Appendix 5. 
The conclusion for cultural resources per the Categorical Exclusion research and response by the State 
Historic Preservation Office is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by this project. 
Additional information and regulatory communications are included in the Categorical Exclusion 
document in Appendix 5. 
5.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass 
Bull Creek and the unnamed tributaries are within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard. The Flood 
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for this site has not been published by FEMA. An index map identifies the 
Site location on FIRM 3710592600J for Surry County (CID 370364, Panel 5926). 
One of the design goals for this project is to connect Bull Creek with its historic floodplain through 
Priority 1 restoration. To accomplish this goal, a hydrologic trespass agreement was secured with the 
adjoining and upstream landowner. This agreement facilitates the construction of a ford crossing that 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 12 October 2018 
will raise the stream bed immediately upstream of the proposed Priority 1 restoration activities. This 
increase in the bed elevation of the stream will create a backwater condition for approximately 1,500 
feet upstream of the common property boundary and will facilitate Priority 1 restoration within 
approximately 450 feet downstream of the boundary. The project is in an area of minimal flood hazard 
and the proposed activities are not anticipated to adversely impact insurable structures.  
5.3 401/404 
As part of the existing conditions assessment at the Site, Wildlands documented and classified the 
existing condition of on‐site wetlands. Classifications were applied based on wetland function and 
potential for wetland improvement through the stream design approach. Based on these classifications, 
Wildlands designers used this information to prioritize higher quality wetlands in the avoidance and 
minimization process and to incorporate stream design approaches to improve hydrologic and 
vegetative conditions of impaired wetlands. 
The proposed stream channel alignment has avoided the majority of existing on‐site wetlands. Wetland 
A, a low‐quality wetland within and abandoned channel meander is proposed as an impact to restore 
the degraded stream reach within this proximity. Other wetlands within the work area will be flagged 
with safety fence during construction to prevent unintended impacts. This will be denoted in the final 
construction plans on the Erosion and Sediment Control plan and Detail plan sheets, as well as in the 
project specifications. Wildlands expects a net gain of wetland area, as construction of the new channel 
will raise groundwater elevations throughout the floodplain.  
Table 6 estimates the anticipated impacts to wetland areas on this project. The Pre‐Construction 
Notification, including this data, will be submitted to the IRT with the Final Mitigation Plan. 
Table 6: Estimated Impacts to Project Wetlands – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Jurisdictional 
Feature Classification Acreage Permanent (P) or 
Temporary (T) Type of Activity Impact Area 
(acres) 
Wetland A 
Riparian 
Riverine 
0.028 P Channel fill 0.028 
Wetland B 0.021  N/A N/A ‐‐‐ 
Wetland C 0.220  N/A N/A ‐‐‐ 
Wetland D 0.002  N/A N/A ‐‐‐ 
Wetland E 0.001  N/A N/A ‐‐‐ 
Wetland F 0.009  N/A N/A ‐‐‐ 
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives 
The project will improve stream functions as described in Section 4 through stream and buffer 
restoration. Project goals are desired project outcomes that can be verified through measurement 
and/or visual assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The 
project will be monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 8 of this 
report. The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 7.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 13 October 2018 
Table 7: Mitigation Goals and Objectives – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes Function Supported 
Improve stream 
channel stability. 
Restore stream channels that will 
maintain a stable pattern and profile 
considering the hydrologic and 
sediment inputs to the system, the 
landscape setting, and the watershed 
conditions. Create stable tie‐ins for 
tributaries joining restored channels. 
Add bank revetments and in‐stream 
structures to protect restored streams. 
Significantly reduce sediment 
inputs from bank erosion. 
Reduce shear stress on 
channel boundary. Support all 
stream functions above 
hydrology. 
Hydraulic, 
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
Stabilize eroding stream 
banks. 
Reconstruct stream channels slated for 
restoration with stable dimensions. 
Create stable tie‐ins for. Add bank 
revetments and in‐stream structures to 
reaches to protect restored/enhanced 
streams. 
Reduce sediment inputs and 
contribute to protection of or 
improvement to Yadkin River 
headwaters. 
Hydraulic, 
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
Exclude livestock from 
stream channels. 
Install livestock fencing and watering 
systems as needed to exclude livestock 
from stream channels and riparian 
areas. 
Reduction in pollutant inputs 
to streams including fecal 
coliform, nitrogen, and 
phosphorous.  
Hydraulic,  
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
Reconnect channels 
with historic 
floodplains. 
Reconstruct stream channels with 
appropriate bankfull dimensions and 
depth relative to the floodplain.  
Raise water table and hydrate 
riparian wetlands. Allow more 
frequent flood flows to 
disperse on the floodplain and 
create overbank floodplain 
and depression storage for 
overland flow retention. 
Decrease direct runoff, 
increase infiltration. Support 
all stream functions above 
hydrology. 
Hydraulic, 
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
Improve instream 
habitat. 
Install habitat features such as 
constructed riffles, cover logs, and 
brush toes into restored/enhanced 
streams. Add woody materials to 
channel beds. Construct pools of 
varying depth.  
Increase and diversify 
available habitats for 
macroinvertebrates, fish, and 
amphibians. Promote aquatic 
species migration and 
recolonization to increase in 
biodiversity over time. Add 
complexity including LWD to 
the streams. 
Geomorphology,  
Biology 
Reduce sediment and 
nutrient input from 
adjacent farm fields. 
Restore the streams’ riparian buffers. 
Construct a BMP to slow and treat 
runoff from farm fields before entering 
Site streams. 
Reduce agricultural and 
sediment inputs to the 
project, which will reduce 
likelihood of accumulated 
fines and excessive algal 
blooms from nutrients.  
Hydraulic,  
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 14 October 2018 
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes Function Supported 
Restore and enhance 
native floodplain 
vegetation. 
Plant native tree species in riparian 
zone where currently insufficient. 
Reduce sediment inputs from 
bank erosion and runoff. 
Increase nutrient cycling and 
storage in floodplain. Provide 
riparian and wetland habitat. 
Add a source of LWD and 
organic material to stream. 
Support all stream functions. 
Hydraulic, 
Geomorphology, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
Permanently protect 
the Site from 
degradational impacts. 
Establish a conservation easement on 
the Site and install cattle exclusion 
fencing.  
Protect Site from 
encroachment on the riparian 
corridor and direct impact to 
streams and wetlands. 
Support all stream functions. 
Hydraulic, Geomorphic, 
Physicochemical, 
Biology 
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan 
7.1 Design Approach Overview 
The design approach for this Site (Figure 6) was developed to meet the goals and objectives described in 
Section 6 which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 4. The design is 
also intended to provide the expected outcomes in Section 6, though these are not tied to performance 
criteria. The project streams proposed for restoration on the Site will be reconnected with an active 
floodplain and the channels will be reconstructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile that will 
transport the water and sediment delivered to the system. Instream structures will be constructed in 
the channels to help maintain stable channel morphology and improve aquatic habitat. The entire 
project area will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement.  
The design approach for this Site utilized a combination of analog and analytical approaches for stream 
restoration and relies on empirical data and prior experiences and observations. Reference reaches 
were identified to serve as the basis for design parameters. Channels were sized based on design 
discharge hydrologic analysis which uses a combination of empirical and analytical data as described 
within this report. Designs were then verified and/or modified based on sediment transport analysis. 
These design approaches have been used on many successful Piedmont and Mountain restoration 
projects and is appropriate for the goals and objectives for this Site.  
7.2 Reference Streams  
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform 
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds. Eight reference 
reaches were identified to support the design of streams on this Site (Figure 7). These reference reaches 
were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage area, valley slope, 
morphology, and bed material. Due to the variety of slopes, stream types, and location of the Site with 
respect to the Piedmont and Blueridge ecoregion boundary, the distribution of reference reaches is well 
sorted throughout North Carolina foothills, Western Piedmont and Blueridge. Geomorphic parameters 
for these reference reaches are summarized in Appendix 4. The references used for the specific streams 
are shown in Table 8. A brief description of each reference reach is included below.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 15 October 2018 
Table 8: Stream Reference Data: Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Design Stream  Bull Creek UT1B UT1C UT2 UT2A UT2B UT2C UT3B UT3C Reach 1A 1B 2 3 
Reference Stream Stream 
Type C3 C3 C3b C3 B4 B4a B4 B4 C4b C4 B4 C4 
UT to Catawba R1 E5  X  X                     
UT to Catawba R2 E3b/C3b     X                   
UT to Sandy Run E4                    X   X 
Box Creek C4  X  X   X                 
UT to Kelly Branch B4/B4a         X X    X         
UT to Gap Branch B4/B4a              X           
UT to South Fork Catawba B4c                 X       
Timber Tributary B4                     X   
7.2.1 UT to Catawba River R1 
UT to Catawba River Reach 1 (R1) is a flat (0.5% slope) E5 channel with a drainage area of 1.6 square 
miles. This reach is located west of Statesville in the Catawba River Basin and piedmont ecoregion. It 
runs into the Catawba River just south of the Lookout Shoals Dam. The banks along this reference reach 
are heavily forested. This reach was identified to support the designated design discharge (i.e., discharge 
analysis) for Bull Creek Reach 1A and 1B due to its flat slope and comparable drainage area and stream 
type.  
7.2.2 UT to Catawba River R2 
UT to Catawba River R2 is a E3b/C3b channel with a drainage area of 1.6 square miles. This reach has a 
steeper slope (2.7%) as compared to Reach 1. This reach is much like Bull Creek Reach 2 when 
considering drainage area and slope.  
7.2.3 UT to Sandy Run 
UT to Sandy Run is a small, sinuous, headwater stream located in Cleveland County, just southwest of 
the Town of Boiling Springs. It has a drainage area of 0.15 square miles and is part of the Broad River 
Basin in the Piedmont ecoregion. The reference reach drains into another unnamed tributary of Sandy 
Run before flowing into Sandy Run, which eventually empties into the Broad River. The reference reach 
is situated within the Broad River Greenway property which is densely forested and is protected by a 
conservation easement. The channel classifies as an E4 channel. The channel bed, however, is vertically 
contained by long, stable, gravel/cobble riffle sequences that serve as grade control, and a lower 
elevation, nested bankfull channel has formed within the original incised channel. UT to Sandy Run was 
determined to be a reference reach for UT2C and UT3C because of its drainage area and slope.  
7.2.4 Box Creek 
The Box Creek reference reach site is part of the Broad River Basin located in Rutherford County and has 
a drainage area of 2.13 square miles. This reference reach is in the Blue Ridge ecoregion but near its border 
with the Piedmont ecoregion. The drainage area and slope were similar to the Site and thus were 
considered. It is located within the Box Creek Wilderness area on the western periphery of the property, 
about two miles northeast of the town of Union Mills. The entire  watershed  is f orested, a nd  t he  r eference  
reach site is located approximately a quarter mile upstream from a large pond. The reach is characterized 
by short riffles, deep pools, and long shallow runs. This moderately sinuous reach (1.3) classifies as a C4 
channel. This reach, banks were typically stable due to a large extent of woody vegetation lining each 
bank, especially along the outer bends of a few tight meanders. In‐stream habitat structures included 
undercut banks, woody debris, and coarse substrate. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 16 October 2018 
7.2.5 UT to Kelly Branch 
The UT to Kelly Branch reference reach is a small, steep (6.5% channel slope), headwater channel located 
in the McDowell County. This reach is also in the Blue Ridge ecoregion and near its border to the Piedmont 
ecoregion and therefore considered. The drainage area and slope were very comparable to reaches found 
on the Site. It has a drainage area of 0.08 square miles. The reach classifies as a B4a step‐pool channel, 
but pool depths are unreliable as a reference as they are filled with sediment from an upstream source. 
Bankfull channel dimensions of riffle features were consistent throughout the reach.  The channel 
sinuosity is high for a steep gradient system, but planform is stable and makes use of the valley bottom 
where possible. Several long gravel/cobble riffles were observed that cascaded into pools over root mass, 
woody debris or a boulder step at the tail of riffle. 
7.2.6 UT to Gap Branch 
UT to Gap Branch is located in the Box Creek Wilderness in Union Mills, NC. This reach is in the Blue Ridge 
ecoregion near the Piedmont ecoregion. We considered this reach because of its comparable slope and 
drainage area. This stream flows through a confined valley with an alluvial bottom. The overall channel 
slope is 6.8%. The Rosgen classification for this reach is unclear. This reach could be classified either as a 
slightly entrenched B4a or a slightly entrenched A4. Available habitats at UT to Gap Branch include 
boulder/cobble steps, pools, rock riffles, runs, root and undercut banks. 
7.2.7 UT to South Fork Catawba  
UT to South Fork Catawba River ‐ Vile Preserve is a perennial stream located in the floodplain of the 
South Fork Catawba River. The stream flows through a broad, flat, wetland floodplain complex, which 
receives runoff from adjacent agricultural uplands. The stream is completely connected to the floodplain 
wetlands. The reach has a low slope with a sandy substrate and classifies as a Rosgen B4c stream type.  
7.2.8 Timber Tributary 
Timber Tributary is a B4 classified channel 45 miles west of Winston Salem, NC. It has a drainage area of 
approximately 0.05 square miles. The stream meanders through confined valley surrounded by mature 
trees. The channel has a moderate slope of 3.2%. This system supports varied habitats which included 
woody debris, rock riffles and meander pools. This reach has been chosen to be a reference reach 
because of its slope, drainage area and its proximity to the Site.  
7.3 Design Channel Morphological Parameters 
Reference reaches were a primary source of information to develop the pattern and profile design 
parameters for the streams. Ranges of pattern parameters were developed within the reference reach 
parameter ranges with some exceptions based on best professional judgement and knowledge from 
previous projects. For example, for meandering C designs, radius of curvature ratio is kept above 1.6 on 
all reaches and meander width ratio is kept above a 1.5. Meandering designs have pool widths at 1.2 to 
1.5 times the width of riffles to provide adequate point bars and riffle pool transition zones. Wildlands 
has found these minimum ratios to support stable geometry. Designer experience was used for pool 
design as well. Pool depths were designed to be approximately 3 times the riffle mean depth to provide 
habitat variation. Cross‐section parameters such as area, depth, and width were designed based on the 
design discharge and stable bank slopes. In some cases, the width to depth ratio was increased beyond 
reference parameters as dictated by prior project experience to provide stable bank slopes prior to the 
development of a fully vegetated streambank. Key morphological parameters for the Site are listed in 
Tables 9 ‐ 14. Complete morphological tables for existing, reference, and proposed conditions are in 
Appendix 4. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 17 October 2018 
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Parameter Bull Creek Reach 1A Bull Creek Reach 1B 
Existing  Box Creek Proposed Existing Box Creek Proposed 
Contributing Drainage Area (sq mi) 1.63 2.13 1.63 1.68 2.13 1.68 
Channel/Reach Classification F3 C4  C3 F3  C4 C3 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 16.2‐19.1 23.5 19.5 16.2‐19.1 23.5 17.5 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 18.7‐21.6 28.9 30.2 18.7‐21.6 28.9 23.2 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 4.8‐4.9 3.4 3.2  4.8‐4.9 3.4 3.9 
Design Discharge (cfs) 90.0 99 90.0 90.0 99 90.0 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.009 0.008 0.012 
Sinuosity 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 
Width/Depth Ratio 14.1‐16.8 19.1 12.6 14.1‐16.8 19.1 13.2 
Bank Height Ratio 3.7‐4.1 1.5 1.0  3.7‐4.1 1.5 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 3.3  2.2‐4.6 1.3 3.3 >2.2 

Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Parameter 
Bull Creek Reach 2 Bull Creek Reach 3 
Existing 
UT to 
Catawba 
R2 
Proposed Existing Box Creek Proposed 
Contributing Drainage Area (sq mi) 1.79 1.60 1.79 2.02 2.13 2.02 
Channel/Reach Classification F3 E3b/C3b C3b F3/G3c  C4 C3 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 16.2‐19.1 12.3 16.0 18.0‐25.4 23.5 21.0 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.1 1.1 1.2  1.1‐2.1 1.2 1.5 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 18.7‐21.6 13.2 19.3 26.2‐39.5 28.9 31.1 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 4.8‐4.9 6.1 5.2  4.2‐4.3 3.4 3.9 
Design Discharge (cfs) 99 80.0 99 116 99 116 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.016 0.027 0.024 0.019 0.008 0.008‐0.011 
Sinuosity 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 
Width/Depth Ratio 14.1‐16.2 11.5 13.3  8.5‐22.5 19.1 14.2 
Bank Height Ratio 3.7‐4.1 0.77‐1.26 1.0  1.9‐2.8 1.5 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 4.3  6.3‐7.8  1.3‐2.9 3.3 >2.2 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 18 October 2018 
Table 11: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT1B and UT1C – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Parameter 
UT1B UT1C 
Existing UT to Kelly 
Branch Proposed Existing UT to Kelly 
Branch 
Proposed 
UT1C 
Contributing Drainage Area (sq mi) 0.16 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.16 
Channel/Reach Classification G4c B4/B4a B4 G4 B4/B4a B4a 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 5.6‐7.0 7.9 8.5  5.6‐7.0 7.9 8.3 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 0.7‐1.0 0.7 0.6  0.7‐1.0 0.7 0.6 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 3.9‐6.8 5.7 5.3  3.9‐6.8 5.7 4.8 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 3.5‐5.0 5.9 3.8  3.5‐5.0 5.9 4.1 
Design Discharge (cfs) 19.0 23 19.0 19.0 23 19.0 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.014 0.03‐0.06 0.032 0.044 0.03‐0.06 0.043 
Sinuosity 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.1 
Width/Depth Ratio 7.3‐8.1 10.9 13.8  7.3‐8.1 10.9 14.5 
Bank Height Ratio 5.0‐7.9 2.5 1.0  5.0‐7.9 2.5 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 2.4‐2.5 1.2  2.8‐3.3  2.4‐2.5 1.2  2.7‐2.9 

Table 12: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT2 and UT2A – Key Mill Mitigation Site  
Parameter 
UT2 UT2A 
Existing UT to Gap 
Branch Proposed Existing UT to Kelly 
Branch Proposed 
Contributing Drainage Area (sq mi) 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.08 0.04 
Channel/Reach Classification G4 B4a B4  G5* B4/B4a B4* 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 5.3 6.2 3.5 5.3 7.9 6.0 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.1‐1.4 0.6 0.2  1.1‐1.4 0.7 0.5 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 5.7‐7.4 3.8 0.9  5.7‐7.4 5.7 2.7 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 1.9‐2.2 5.0 3.0  1.9‐2.2 5.9 2.7 
Design Discharge (cfs) 3.0 18.7 3.0 7.0 23.0 7.0 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.047 0.068 0.058 0.022 0.03—0.06 0.023‐0.039 
Sinuosity 1.1  ‐‐‐  N**  1.1  1.2 
1.1 
Width/Depth Ratio 3.7‐4.8 10.1 14.2  3.7‐4.8 10.9 13.3 
Bank Height Ratio 1.4‐1.9 1.0 1.0  1.4‐1.9 2.5 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 16.0‐21.2  ‐‐‐  1.4‐2.2 16.0‐21.2 1.2 2.8‐5.7 
**Existing channel substrate is primarily composed of sand due to excessive sedimentation associated with bank erosion. Post 
restoration sediment is expected to coarsen and result in a gravel bed stream type. Gravel is prevalent within the upstream 
forested reach. 
**Reach is too short to calculate an accurate sinuosity. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 19 October 2018 
Table 13: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT2B and UT2C – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Parameter 
UT2B UT2C 
Existing 
UT to 
South Fork 
Catawba 
Proposed Existing UT to 
Sandy Run Proposed 
Contributing Drainage Area (sq mi) 0.05 0.23 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.05 
Channel/Reach Classification G5c* B4c C4b*  G5* E4 C4* 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 5.3  8.2‐11.2 6.0 5.3 7.3‐7.8 6.8 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.1‐1.4  1‐1.4 0.5  1.1‐1.4  0.7‐0.8 0.5 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 5.7‐7.4 10.7‐11.1 2.6 5.7‐7.4 5.7‐6.2 3.2 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 1.9‐2.2 2.7 2.4  1.9‐2.2 3.4 2.2 
Design Discharge (cfs) 7.0 26.2‐32.3 7.0 7.0 20 7.0 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.017 0.007 0.02 0.020 0.015 0.014 
Sinuosity 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.3 
Width/Depth Ratio 3.7‐4.8  6.0‐11.7 13.3  3.7‐4.8  6.6‐9.8 12.9 
Bank Height Ratio 1.4‐1.9  1.8‐2.1 1.0  1.4‐1.9  1.7‐2.6 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 16.0‐21.2 1.5‐1.9 5.0‐7.5 16.0‐21.2 1.6‐2.1 5.1‐6.6 
*Existing channel substrate is primarily composed of sand due to excessive sedimentation associated with bank erosion. Post 
restoration sediment is expected to coarsen and result in a gravel bed stream type. Gravel is prevalent within the upstream forested 
reach. 

Table 14: Summary of Morphological Parameters UT3B and UT3C – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Parameter 
UT3B UT3C 
Existing Timber Trib Proposed Existing UT to 
Sandy Run 
Proposed 
UT3C 
Contributing Drainage Area (acres) 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.07 
Channel/Reach Classification G5* B4 B4* G5c* E4 C4* 
Design Discharge Width (ft) 3.9‐5.7 8.9 7.0  3.9‐5.7  7.3‐7.8 7.5 
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7  0.7‐0.8 0.6 
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 2.8‐4.1 4.6 3.6  2.8‐4.1  5.7‐6.2 4.7 
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 4.0‐4.2 3.7 3.3  4.0‐4.2 3.4 2.4 
Design Discharge (cfs) 12.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 20 12.0 
Channel Slope (ft/ft) 0.023  N/A 
0.030‐
0.036 0.017 0.015 0.012‐0.015 
Sinuosity 1.5  N/A 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.2 
Width/Depth Ratio 5.4‐7.8 17.0‐17.5 13.7  5.4‐7.8  6.6‐9.8 12.0 
Bank Height Ratio 2.7‐3.8  1.0‐2.4 1.0  2.7‐3.8  1.7‐2.6 1.0 
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6‐3.5 1.5  3.1‐6.0  1.6‐3.5  1.6‐2.1 >2.2 
*Existing channel substrate is primarily composed of sand due to excessive sedimentation associated with bank erosion. Post 
restoration sediment is expected to coarsen and result in a gravel bed stream type. Gravel is prevalent within the upstream EII 
reach. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 20 October 2018 
7.4 Design Discharge Analysis 
Wildlands implemented multiple methods (listed below) to develop a bankfull discharge estimate for 
each of the project restoration reaches. 
 The NC Rural Piedmont regional curve (Harman et al., 1999), 
 NC Piedmont/Mountain regional curve (Walker, unpublished), 
 Regional flood frequency analysis, 
 A site‐specific reference reach curve, 
 Analytical calculations based on existing bankfull indicators and Manning’s equation, and 
 Data from previous successful design projects. 
The resulting values were compared, and Wildlands utilized best professional judgment to determine a 
specific design discharge for each restoration reach. The results are illustrated on Figure 8 to show the 
relationship of the data to the design discharge selections. 
7.4.1 Regional Curve Data 
Discharge was estimated using the published NC Rural Piedmont Curve (Rural Data on Figure 8) as well 
as the updated curve for rural Piedmont and Mountain streams, shown as the Alan Walker Curve on 
Figure 8. 
7.4.2 Wildlands Regional USGS Flood Frequency Analysis 
Wildlands developed a regional flood frequency analysis tool that tailored the USGS 2009 publication 
Magnitude and Frequency of Rural Floods in the Southeastern United States through 2006 to the 
Piedmont of North Carolina. Of the 103 stations referenced in the publication, 23 were used in the 
development of the tool. To fill gaps in data, six additional stations were added by Wildlands to 
represent streams with drainage areas less than one square mile. The Hosking and Wallis homogeneity 
test was performed in R© to identify the most appropriate gages based on homogeneity (Hosking and 
Wallis, 1993). The gages used were:  
 USGS 2077210 – Kilgore Creek Tributary near Leasburg, NC (DA = 0.25 mi2) 
 USGS 2068610 – Hog Rock Creek near Moores Springs, NC (DA = 0.31 mi2) 
 USGS 214399575 – Long Creek Tributary at headwater near Bessemer City, NC (DA = 0.16 mi2) 
 USGS 3463910 – Phipps Creek near Burnsville, NC (DA = 1.61 mi2) 
 USGS 2097010 – Robeson Creek near Pittsboro, NC (DA = 1.71 mi2) 
 USGS 2077310 – Storys Creek near Roxboro, NC (DA = 1.86 mi2) 
The data from these 29 gage stations were used to develop flood frequency curves for the 1‐year, 1.2‐
year, 1.5‐year, 1.8‐year, and 2‐year recurrence interval discharges. These relationships can be used to 
estimate discharge of those recurrence intervals for ungaged streams in the same hydrologic region and 
were solved for each project reach’s discharge with the drainage area as the input. The discharge 
estimates are shown on Figure 8 as the USGS Rural Piedmont Calculator 1.2 yr predictions.  
7.4.3 Site Specific Reference Reach Curve 
Eight reference reaches were identified for this project. Each reference reach was surveyed to develop 
information for analyzing drainage area‐discharge relationships as well as development of design 
parameters. Stable cross‐sectional dimensions and channel slopes were used to compute a bankfull 
discharge with the Manning’s equation for each reference reach. The resulting discharge values were 
plotted with drainage area on Figure 8 (Reference Reach Curve) and compared the other discharge 
estimation methods. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 21 October 2018 
7.4.4 Maximum Discharge (Manning’s Equation) 
A riffle cross‐section was surveyed on each major design reach on the Site. Manning’s equation was 
used to calculate a maximum discharge associated with the top of banks at all cross sections. Stream 
slope was calculated from the surveyed channel slope, and roughness was estimated using guidelines 
from Chow (1959). This corresponding discharge was plotted on Figure 8 (Qmax – Existing Site Streams) 
and considered as an upper limit for potential bankfull discharge values throughout the Site.  
7.4.5 Design Discharge Analysis Summary 
One of the main design goals at Key Mill is to improve the stability of the stream channels throughout 
the Site. Channels were sized so that any discharge larger than the design discharge will access the 
floodplain. The design discharge was selected so that, during typical precipitation conditions, the design 
streams would flood with the desired frequency.  The results of each method described above to 
estimate discharge and the final selected design discharges for each reach are shown in the Tables 15 
and 16.  

Table 15: Summary of Bull Creek Design Discharge Analysis – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
  Bull Creek 
  Reach 1A1 Reach 2 Reach 3 
DA (acres) 1,045 1,146 1,293 
DA (sq. mi.) 1.63 1.79 2.02 
NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (cfs) 127 136 148 
Alan Walker Curve (cfs) 82 88 97 
Regional Flood 
Frequency Analysis (cfs) 
1.2‐year event 111 119 130 
1.5‐year event 157 168 183 
Site Specific Reference Reach Curve 80 83 88 
Max Q from Manning's Eq. from XS survey (cfs) 1484 N/A 922 
 Final Design Q (cfs) 90 99 116 
1. Applicable to Bull Creek Reach 1A and 1B 
Table 16: Summary of Tributary Design Discharge Analysis – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
 UT1A1 UT2A2 UT2 UT3A3 
DA (acres) 102 32 6 45 
DA (sq. mi.) 0.16 0.05 0.01 0.07 
NC Rural Piedmont Regional Curve (cfs) 23 10  2 14 
Alan Walker Curve (cfs) 13 5 1 7 
Regional Flood 
Frequency Analysis (cfs) 
1.2‐year event 20 9 3 11 
1.5‐year event 29 13  4 16 
Site Specific Reference Reach Curve 29 18  8 21 
Max Q from Manning's Eq. from XS survey (cfs) 1159 62  N/A 102 
Final Design Q (cfs) 19 3 7 12 
1. Applicable to UT1A, UT1B, and UT1C 
2. Applicable to UT2A, UT2B and UT2C 
3. Applicable to UT3, UT3A, UT3B, and UT3C 
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis 
A current and historical analysis of the streams and land use within and adjacent to the project, was 
conducted to facilitate the sediment transport analysis. The existing watershed conditions have been 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 22 October 2018 
relatively static in this rural area over an extended period with minor exceptions, and the potential for 
future land use changes was determined to be insignificant based on historical trends and the rural 
character of the surrounding area. Sediment contributions from the watershed are deemed to be 
constant and are not expected to vary significantly in the future. The forested conditions immediately 
upstream of the project on Bull Creek suggest that local factors predominately contribute sediment 
within the project corridor and that the sediment load contributed by the upstream watershed (beyond 
the project limits) is stable. Sediment deposition observed in the existing channels is attributed to local 
bank erosion within the project streams and input from adjacent pastures. Thus, the design approach 
will address the major sediment source (i.e., bank erosion) within the project area by protecting stream 
banks and increasing shear resistance via the construction of in‐stream structures. The constructed 
streams will not be capacity limited; therefore, the focus of sediment transport analysis was to verify 
that the designed channels will be stable over time and provide the competence to pass the sediment 
delivered by the watershed. 
7.5.1 Capacity Analysis 
For watersheds with rapidly changing land uses and for streams with visual signs of high bedload supply, 
a detailed capacity analysis along with field data collection may be necessary for proper design. Based 
on the analysis described above, the project streams currently appear to be supply limited (e.g. have 
capacity to move a sediment load greater than the supplied load). There is no reason to believe that the 
watershed will be altered in the future to increase the sediment yield. Most of the restoration reaches 
have been designed to maintain or exceed the competency of the existing channels and grade control 
structures have been utilized to prevent future incision. 
7.5.2 Competence Analysis 
In natural streams, the shear stress in a channel increases corresponding to an increase in discharge 
until the point at which the stream is flowing full and gains access to the floodplain. The floodplain 
access disperses the flow and prevents further increases in shear stress within the channel. This 
relationship of shear stress, channel dimension, and discharge influences erosion potential within the 
channel and the channel’s ability to entrain certain sizes of sediment (competence). To support the 
competence analysis, the calculated shear stresses for both existing and proposed conditions along 
restoration reaches were compared to determine if the proposed stream will be able to move the bed 
material within the channel and to support material sizing within the constructed riffles. The proposed 
channels were modeled using their design bankfull flow. The analysis utilized standard equations based 
on a methodology using the Shields (1936) curve and Andrews (1984) equation described by Rosgen 
(2001). Channel slope and design dimensions were varied until the resulting design verified that the 
stream reach could move the bed load supplied to the stream. The competence analysis for each project 
reach is summarized in Tables 17 and 18.  
The initial competence analysis was based on the size material naturally found in the stream to mimic 
potential bed load. The results were used to inform further design of the reach. Wood and rock 
structures, including various riffle types (i.e., chunky riffles, etc.), were located based on the shear stress 
results and integrated into the design as grade control. Also, the proposed D50 and D100 for the 
constructed riffles were sized to ensure a stable pavement layer while allowing for bed load material to 
be active within the system. Riffles will be supplemented with Class A stone where the predicted shear 
stress is equal to or less than the calculated bankfull shear stress. Class B stone will be utilized along Bull 
Creek Reach 2 and UT1C.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 23 October 2018 
Table 17: Sediment Transport Competency Analysis Bull Creek – Key Mill Mitigation Site 

Bull Creek 
Reach 1A Reach 1B Reach 2 Reach 3 
Dbkf (ft) 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 
Schan (ft/ft) 0.0069 0.0123 0.0242 0.0076‐0.0114 
Bankfull Shear Stress, t (lb/sq ft) 0.64 0.98 1.76 1.02 
Existing Dmax Subpavement (mm) 49 76 76 45 
Dcrit (ft)  1.49 1.27 0.65 0.83 
Scrit (ft/ft) 0.0064 0.012 0.013 0.0063 
Movable particle size (mm) 49 77 140 80 
Predicted Shear Stress to move Dmax  0.64 0.98 0.98 0.59 
1. Reported numbers are based on the Shield’s curve. 
2. Where a range is reported, the higher number reported was utilized for calculations. 
3. The maximum and D50 for Class A stone are 152.4mm and 101.6mm, respectively (NCDOT standard specification). 
4. The maximum and D50 for Class B are 304.8mm and 203.2mm, respectively (NCDOT standard specification). 

Table 18: Sediment Transport Competency Analysis Tributaries – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
 Tributaries 
 UT1B UT1C UT2A UT2B UT2C UT2 UT3B UT3C 
Dbkf (ft) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.6 
Schan (ft/ft) 0.0168 0.0389 0.0368 0.0115 0.0135 0.0584 0.0230 0.0121‐
0.0192 
Bankfull Shear Stress, t 
(lb/sq ft) 1.19 1.50 1.05 0.52 0.38 1.06 1.13 0.55 
Existing Dmax Subpavement 
(mm) 74 74 28 28 28 28 50 50 
Dcrit (ft)  0.48 0.36 0.15 0.3 0.44 0.09 0.29 0.72 
Scrit (ft/ft) 0.0254 0.0254 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.03 0.0209 0.0174 
Movable particle size (mm) 94 119 83 40 29 84 89 42 
Predicted Shear Stress to 
move Dmax  0.95 0.95 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.65 0.65 
1. Reported numbers are based on the Shield’s curve. 
2. Where a range is reported, the higher number reported was utilized for calculations. 
3. The maximum and D50 for Class A stone are 152.4mm and 101.6mm, respectively (NCDOT standard specification). 
4. The maximum and D50 for Class B are 304.8mm and 203.2mm, respectively (NCDOT standard specification). 
The predicted largest movable particle is less than the existing maximum diameter of a subpavement 
particle for reach UT3C. Existing native subpavement material will be utilized to the extent practicable 
along this reach because the largest measured particle is not expected to be transported as bedload in 
the proposed stream. Note, the D50 of the pavement material is expected to coarsen over time with the 
reduction and elimination of bank erosion, promoting further stabilization of the riffle substrate. 
7.6 Project Implementation 
7.6.1 Bull Creek Reach 1A 
One of the design goals for this project is to connect Bull Creek with its historic floodplain through 
Priority 1 restoration. To accomplish this goal, an agreement was secured with the adjoining and 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 24 October 2018 
upstream landowner to raise the stream bed at the headwaters of this project and facilitate hydraulic 
trespass. Previously introduced in Section 5.2, this design approach facilitates Priority 1 restoration 
within approximately 500 feet of the upstream property boundary. The channel will be constructed as a 
C3 channel with a flat slope (approximately 0.7%) to transition from Priority 2 to Priority 1 restoration. 
Brush toe has been incorporated to increase shear resistance along outside meanders and riffles consist 
of native and chunky material, per the details.  
7.6.2 Bull Creek Reach 1B 
Bull Creek Reach 1B carries Priority 1 restoration for approximately seven hundred feet. The slope along 
this reach steepens to approximately 1.2%, allowing a reduction in the physical characteristics (i.e., 
bankfull width and depth) of the cross‐section while promoting more frequent inundation of the 
floodplain. The Priority 1 restoration approach allows for construction of a new C3 channel within the 
historic floodplain and outside of the existing channel. Log vanes and J‐hooks are proposed along this 
reach to re‐direct flow towards the center of the channel and reduce near bank shear stress. Brush toe 
and lunker logs have been incorporated to promote the beneficial re‐use of woody debris in the 
proposed channel. Riffle types are more diverse along this reach (as compared to Reach 1A) to promote 
bed form diversity. 
7.6.3 Bull Creek Reach 2 
Restoration activities must tie into the existing Bull Creek to avoid disturbance to the historic mill and to 
allow the stream to pass beneath Key Road. A Priority 2 restoration approach and C3b channel type 
(~2.4% slope) are proposed for approximately four hundred feet (upstream of the mill) to facilitate this 
transition. Structures (i.e., brush mattress, boulder toe, J‐hooks and log‐rock cascade riffles, etc.) are 
proposed along this reach to dissipate shear stress along the bank and bed of the proposed channel. 
7.6.4 Bull Creek Reach 3 
Two existing corrugated metal pipes carry Bull Creek beneath Key Road. A cattle crossing (designated as 
an internal crossing) is required immediately downstream of these existing culverts and is followed by 
the upstream extent of Bull Creek Reach 3. Reach 3 carries a C3 channel type with an average channel 
slope of 0.95% approximately 1,700 feet. UT2 and UT3 confluence with this reach before a proposed 
internal crossing and dual arch pipe culverts. This crossing will conjoin with an existing access road on 
the right floodplain to facilitate on‐going farming activities. Reach 3 continues past the culvert as a 
Priority 2 C3 channel type for approximately 850 linear feet prior to tying into the downstream 
preservation reach. J‐hooks, log vanes, brush toe, and brush mattress have been incorporated within 
this reach to reduce bank erosion.  
Along Reach 3, a step‐pool BMP will be created in the right floodplain, approximately 500 feet 
downstream of Key Road. The step‐pools will capture runoff from a gully with a drainage area of 
approximately 20 acres and will provide initial treatment before water enters the restored stream.  
7.6.5 Bull Creek Reach 4 
Bull Creek Reach 4 is identified for preservation and continues from the downstream extent of Reach 3 
to the property boundary. 
7.6.6 UT1 
Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT1) confluences with Bull Creek west of Key Road. This reach will be enhanced 
along its upstream extent (UT1A) through fencing, cattle exclusion, isolated grading, and planting. A 
collapsed culvert will be removed, and bank and bed grading will be conducted to promote long‐term 
stability. A new culvert will be installed approximately 250 feet downstream and will be accommodated 
via bank and bed grading. The grass road leading to the existing crossing will be re‐established and lead 
to the new culvert. The replacement of the collapsed culvert, along with profile adjustments, is expected 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 25 October 2018 
to restore a more natural sediment transport regime along this reach. A cucumber magnolia tree is 
located on the right bank of UT1A approximately 100 feet downstream of the existing culvert. This tree 
will be preserved at the request of the landowner.  
Downstream of the enhancement reach, approximately 200 feet of UT1B is designated for restoration 
via a Priority 2 approach. Priority 1 restoration is unachievable due to the narrow and steep valley and 
short valley length. The break between restoration and enhancement II was agreed upon during the IRT 
site visit in August 2017. This B4 channel type has an average slope of 3.2%. Log sills and woody riffles 
are utilized for grade control along this reach, and native and chunky riffles are proposed to promote 
bedform diversity. UT1B terminates at an internal crossing and is succeeded by UT1C.  
UT1C begins at the downstream extent of an internal crossing and restores approximately 250 linear 
feet of channel as a B4a stream type. Priority 2 restoration is necessary to tie into the confluence with 
Bull Creek Reach 2. The designed floodplain for Bull Creek Reach 2 will result in a wider valley along 
UT1C, as compared to existing conditions. The wider valley will allow the B4a stream to be constructed 
almost entirely offline, within the left floodplain of the existing channel. This reach follows a similar 
approach to UT1B, it has an average channel slope of 4.3% and incorporates log sills for grade control 
and brush toe for bank stability.  
7.6.7 UT2 
UT2, begins on the adjacent property to the south along Key Road. It begins from a spring box and only 
collects a 0.01 square mile drainage area. After entering the Site under the existing fence, it conjoins 
with UT2A just after 42 feet. This reach is very steep with steep valley walls. It has a channel slope of 
5.8%. The restoration here is Priority 2 before the confluence with UT2A. Log sills are used for grade 
control on this reach. 
UT2A begins off property and conveys a 0.05 square mile drainage area onto the site. Beginning at the 
fence line, UT2A is approximately 315 feet and ends at an internal crossing. This reach will be restored 
as a B4 stream type using Priority 2 restoration. UT2A follows a steep constricted valley which limited its 
access to the floodplain in areas. Its average channel slope is 2.5%. Chunky riffles have been utilized 
here to dissipate channel velocity and log sills are frequently used to facilitate grade control. The valley 
walls begin to open up at its end near the internal crossing.  
UT2B will be restored as a C4b channel for approximately 263 linear feet as Priority 2 restoration. It 
begins after an internal crossing and runs down the valley until being succeeded but UT2C. UT2B 
continues to be confined by steep valley walls until completely opening up to pasture near its end. The 
surrounding valley and change in slopes facilitate a transition to the C4 channel UT2C. UT2B’s channel 
slope is 2%. Log sills and Brush toe are frequent for this reach.  
UT2C will be restored as a C4 channel consisting of Priority 2 restoration, because of the elevation drop 
needed for the confluence to Bull Creek. UT2C is approximately 469 linear feet before the confluence 
with Bull Creek. This reach has a wide floodplain and has very few trees along its banks. This allowed an 
increase in sinuosity and larger meanders, emphasizing C4 channel type characteristics. On the left 
floodplain about 150 feet upstream of the bull creek confluence is an old utility pole. This will be 
removed to not interfere with construction and grading. Behind it, the fully functioning utility pole, will 
not be disturbed and is excluded from the conservation easement. UT2C has an average slope of 1.4%. 
Brush toe is commonly used here to stabilize the stream banks.  
7.6.8 UT3 
UT3 begins at one of the outlets of the existing farm pond and extends 19 feet before the confluence 
with UT3A. UT3 is an enhancement II reach.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 26 October 2018 
UT3A is an enhancement II reach, beginning from the other outlet of the existing farm pond. Cattle 
currently have access to the channel and bank erosion is common due to hoof shear. Areas of bank 
grading and profile manipulation are proposed to in this area to enhance the functionality of this 
stream. The enhancement reach spans approximately 400 linear feet before its transition to UT3B, 
restoration.  
UT3B is Priority 2 restoration for approximately 300 linear feet. Confined by a narrow steep valley and 
constrained by existing grades, the proposed stream runs down the center of the valley. The average 
channel slope is 3.2%. This reach has tall mature trees on both of banks which will be avoided to the 
extent possible. Log sills were frequently incorporated into the design to maintain grade control and to 
facilitate flatter riffle slopes. Brush toe was also incorporated to protect the stream’s banks. UT3B is a B4 
channel and ends at an internal crossing before transition to UT3C.  
UT3C begins after an internal crossing and runs for approximately 400 feet until the confluence with Bull 
Creek. The majority of this reach is Priority 1 restoration with the last 150 feet Priority 2 before the 
confluence. The valley for this reach transitions from constricted to open and pastureland is on both 
floodplains with a designed channel slope of 1.3%. Brush toe and log sills are incorporated regulary on 
this reach to maintain the stream’s structural integrity. The low slope in this area supports the design of 
UT3C as a C4 channel type.  
7.7 Vegetation and Planting Plan 
The objective of the planting plan is to establish, over time, a thriving riparian buffer composed of native 
tree species. This restored buffer will improve riparian habitat, help the restored streams stay stable, 
shade the streams, and provide a source for LWD and organic material to the streams. Non‐forested 
areas as well as areas with limited, existing tree densities within the conservation easement will be 
planted, as illustrated in the plans. Riparian buffers will be seeded and planted with native vegetation 
chosen to develop the species diversity of a Piedmont Bottomland Forest community (Schafale, 2012). 
The specific species composition to be planted was selected based on the community type, observation 
of occurrence of species in riparian buffers adjacent to the Site, and best professional judgement on 
species establishment and anticipated Site conditions in the early years following project 
implementation. Species chosen for the planting plan are listed in the enclosed plans.  
The riparian buffer will be planted with bare root seedlings. In addition, the stream banks will be planted 
with live stakes and the channel toe will be planted with multiple herbaceous species. Permanent 
herbaceous seed will be applied to streambanks, floodplain areas, and disturbed areas within the 
project easement.  
Invasive species within the riparian buffers of restoration reaches will be treated at the time of 
construction. The extent of invasive species coverage will be monitored, mapped, and controlled as 
necessary throughout the required monitoring period. Refer to Appendix 6 for the invasive species plan. 
Additional monitoring and maintenance issues regarding vegetation are in Sections 8 and 9.  
7.8 Project Risk and Uncertainties 
The land use surrounding the project is currently being utilized as an active cattle farm. Following 
construction, livestock will be precluded from accessing the restored stream and buffer. Due to the rural 
nature of the area, the potential for the urban development is low, and the remaining watersheds are 
zoned to remain rural.  
8.0 Performance Standards  
The stream and vegetation performance standards for the project have been developed based on 
guidance presented in the DMS Mitigation Plan Template (DMS, August 2016) and the Stream and 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 27 October 2018 
Wetland Mitigation Guidance (USACE, 2016). Annual monitoring and semi‐annual site visits will be 
conducted to assess the condition of the finished project. Specific performance standard components 
are proposed for stream morphology, hydrology, and vegetation. Performance criteria will be evaluated 
throughout the seven‐year post‐construction monitoring period. An outline of the performance criteria 
components follows.  
8.1 Streams 
8.1.1 Dimension 
Riffle cross‐sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in 
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width‐to‐depth ratio. Per DMS guidance, bank height ratios 
shall not exceed 1.2 and entrenchment ratios shall be at least 2.2 for restored C and E channel types to 
be considered stable. All riffle cross‐sections should fall within the parameters defined for the 
designated stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the 
stream channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg 
or eroding channel banks. Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement 
toward stability.  
8.1.2 Pattern and Profile 
Visual assessments and photo documentation should indicate that streams are remaining stable and do 
not indicate a trend toward vertical or lateral instability.  
8.1.3 Substrate 
Channel substrate materials will be sampled with the pebble count method along restoration reaches. 
These reaches should show maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles 
in the pool features. Riffles may fine over the course of monitoring due to the stabilization of 
contributing watershed sediment sources.  
8.1.4 Photo Documentation 
Photographs should illustrate the Site’s morphological and vegetative stability on an annual basis. Cross‐
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal 
photos should indicate the absence of persistent of mid‐channel bars or vertical incision. Grade control 
structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is preferable. 
Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.  
8.1.5 Hydrology 
The occurrence of bankfull events will be documented throughout the monitoring period. Four bankfull 
flow events must be documented on the restoration reaches within the seven‐year monitoring period. 
The four bankfull events must occur in separate years. In addition, the low flow channel (UT2) will have 
a stream gage pressure transducer installed mid‐reach to document 30 consecutive days of baseflow. 
8.2 Vegetation 
The final vegetative performance standard will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the 
planted riparian areas at the end of the required seven‐year monitoring period (MY7). The interim 
measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at 
the end of monitoring year MY3) and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of monitoring year 5 (MY5). 
The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout 
the required monitoring period. 
8.3 Visual Assessments 
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described 
above. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 28 October 2018 
9.0 Monitoring Plan 
The Site monitoring plan has been developed to ensure that the required performance standards are 
met and project goals and objectives are achieved. Annual monitoring data will be reported using the 
DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting Template (DMS, 2015). The monitoring report shall provide project 
data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, ease population of 
DMS databases for analysis and research purposes, and assist in close‐out decision making.  
Using the DMS As‐Built Baseline Monitoring Report Template (DMS, 2014), a baseline monitoring 
document and as‐built record drawings of the project will be developed within 60 days of the planting 
completion and monitoring installation at the Site. Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of 
each monitoring year and submitted to DMS by November 30. These reports will be based on the DMS 
Annual Monitoring Template, Closeout Template Guidance, and Closeout Report Template (DMS, 2015). 
Standard DMS monitoring reports will be submitted in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Monitoring 
activities in years 4 and 6 will documented in a memorandum to include a project summary update, 
annual photos, and updated monitoring plan map. Closeout will occur seven years beyond completion of 
construction or once performance standards are met. 
Table 18, below, describes how the monitoring plan is set up to verify that project goals and objectives 
have been achieved.  
9.1 Monitoring Components 
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Tables 19 ‐ 21. Approximate locations of the 
proposed stream and vegetation monitoring components are illustrated in Figure 9.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 29 October 2018 
Table 19: Monitoring Plan – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Goal Objective Performance Standard Monitoring 
Metric 
Improve stream 
channel stability. 
Restore stream channels that will maintain a 
stable pattern and profile considering the 
hydrologic and sediment inputs to the 
system, the landscape setting, and the 
watershed conditions. Create stable tie‐ins 
for tributaries joining restored channels. Add 
bank revetments and in‐stream structures to 
protect restored streams. 
Bank height ratios stay below 
1.2. Visual assessments indicate 
progression towards stability.  
Cross‐section 
monitoring and 
visual 
assessment.  
Stabilize eroding 
stream banks. 
Reconstruct stream channels slated for 
restoration with stable dimensions. Create 
stable tie‐ins for. Add bank revetments and 
in‐stream structures to reaches to protect 
restored/enhanced streams. 
Cross‐sections should be stable 
and show little change in 
bankfull area, and width‐to‐
depth ratio. 
Cross‐section 
monitoring and 
visual 
assessment.  
Exclude livestock 
from stream 
channels. 
Install livestock fencing and watering 
systems as needed to exclude livestock from 
stream channels and riparian areas. 
Exclusion fencing to be 
maintained if livestock are 
present. Livestock are not within 
the conservation easement 
area. 
Visual 
assessment of 
fencing and signs 
of livestock 
encroachment. 
Reconnect 
channels with 
historic 
floodplains. 
Reconstruct stream channels with 
appropriate bankfull dimensions and depth 
relative to the floodplain.  
There is no required 
performance standard for this 
metric. 
Visual 
assessment 
Improve instream 
habitat. 
Install habitat features such as constructed 
riffles, cover logs, and brush toes into 
restored/enhanced streams. Add woody 
materials to channel beds. Construct pools 
of varying depth.  
There is no required 
performance standard for this 
metric. 
Visual 
assessment 
Restore and 
enhance native 
floodplain 
vegetation. 
Plant native tree species in riparian zone 
where currently insufficient. 
Survival of 210 planted stems 
per acre at MY7. Interim survival 
of at least 320 planted stems at 
MY3 and at least 260 planted 
stems per acre at MY5.  
Permanent and 
mobile 100 
square meter 
vegetation plots 
within planted 
areas.  
Permanently 
protect the Site 
from degradational 
impacts. 
Establish a conservation easement on the 
Site and install cattle exclusion fencing.  
Record and close conservation 
easement prior to 
implementation. 
Visual 
assessment 

   Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan DMS ID No. 97135 Page 30 October 2018 Table 20: Monitoring Components Restoration Reaches – Key Mill Mitigation Site Parameter Monitoring Feature Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes Bull Creek Reach 1A Bull Creek Reach 1B Bull Creek Reach 2 Bull Creek Reach 3 UT1B UT1C Dimension Riffle  Cross‐sections 1  1  1  2  1  1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool  Cross‐sections ‐‐‐  1  ‐‐‐  2  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐ Pattern Pattern N/A  N/A 2 Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A Substrate (RW), Riffle (RF) 100 Pebble Count 1 RW, 1 RF 1 RW, 1 RF 1 RW, 1 RF 1 RW, 2 RF 1 RW, 1 RF 1 RW, 1 RF Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3 Stream Hydrology Crest Gage (CG) / Stream Gage (SG) 1 CG & SG 1 CG & SG  1 CG & SG  Semi‐Annually 4 Vegetation CVS Level 2 8  Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5 Visual Assessment  Yes  Semi‐Annually  Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation   Semi‐Annually 6 Project Boundary   Annual 7 Reference Photos Photographs 12 Annual               
   Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan DMS ID No. 97135 Page 31 October 2018 Parameter Monitoring Feature Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes UT2 UT2A UT2B UT2C UT3B UT3C Dimension Riffle  Cross‐sections ‐‐‐ 1 1 1 1 1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool  Cross‐sections ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐ Pattern Pattern N/A  N/A 2 Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A  N/A Substrate (RW), Riffle (RF) 100 Pebble Count ‐‐‐  1  1  1  1  1  Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3 Stream Hydrology Crest Gage (CG) / Stream Gage (SG) 1 SG 1 CG & SG 1 CG & SG Semi‐Annually 4 Vegetation CVS Level 2 3  Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5 Visual Assessment  Yes  Semi‐Annually  Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation   Semi‐Annually 6 Project Boundary   Annual 7 Reference Photos Photographs 8 Annual   1. Cross‐sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.  2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi‐annual site visits. Longitudinal profile data will be collected during as‐built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.  3. Reach wide pebble counts will be conducted each year a monitoring report is submitted. Riffle (100) pebble counts will be conducted during as‐built baseline monitoring only unless observations indicate otherwise during post‐construction monitoring.  4. Crest gages and/or stream gages (pressure transducers) will be inspected quarterly or semi‐annually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. The stream gage (pressure transducer) will be set to record stage once every 2 hours. 5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the areas planted. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot.  6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped. 7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.    
   Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan DMS ID No. 97135 Page 32 October 2018 Table 21: Monitoring Components Enhancement | Preservation Reaches – Key Mill Mitigation Site Parameter Monitoring Feature Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes UT1A UT3 UT3A Bull Creek Reach 4 Dimension Riffle  Cross‐sections ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7   Pool  Cross‐sections ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐ Pattern Pattern N/A  N/A  Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A Substrate (RW), Riffle (RF) 100 Pebble Count ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  ‐‐‐  Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7  Stream Hydrology Crest Gage (CG) / Stream Gage (SG) ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Semi‐Annually  Vegetation CVS Level 2 2  ‐‐‐  Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7  1 Visual Assessment  Yes  Semi‐Annually  Exotic and Nuisance Vegetation    Semi‐Annually 2 Project Boundary    Annual 3 Reference Photos Photographs 4 Annual   1. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the areas planted. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot. 2. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.  3. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 33 October 2018 
10.0 Long‐Term Management Plan 
The Site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) 
Stewardship Program. This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long‐term steward for 
the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the 
conservation easement are upheld. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an endowment 
system within the non‐reverting, interest‐bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund Account. The 
use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General Statue GS 113A‐
232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for stewardship, monitoring, 
stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.  
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage if needed to identify boundary markings as 
needed. Maintenance of the proposed fencing and permanent crossings will be the responsibility of the 
landowner and not NCDEQ. The template site protection instrument is enclosed in Appendix 7. The site 
protection instrument associated with this project will be enclosed with the final mitigation plan. 
Table 22: Long‐term Management Plan – Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Long‐Term Management Activity Long‐Term Manager 
Responsibility Landowner Responsibility 
Signage will be installed and 
maintained along the Site 
boundary to denote the area 
protected by the recorded 
conservation easement. 
The long‐term steward will be 
responsible for inspecting the Site 
boundary and for maintaining or 
replacing signage to ensure that 
the conservation easement area is 
clearly marked. 
The landowner shall report damaged 
or missing signs to the long‐term 
manager, as well as contact the long‐
term manager if a boundary needs to 
be marked, or clarification is needed 
regarding a boundary location. If land 
use changes in future and fencing is 
required to protect the easement, the 
landowner is responsible for installing 
appropriate approved fencing. 
The Site will be protected in its 
entirety and managed under the 
terms outlined in the recorded 
conservation easement. 
The long‐term manager will be 
responsible for conducting annual 
inspections and for undertaking 
actions that are reasonably 
calculated to swiftly correct the 
conditions constituting a breach. 
The USACE, and their authorized 
agents, shall have the right to 
enter and inspect the Site and to 
take actions necessary to verify 
compliance with the conservation 
easement. 
The landowner shall contact the long‐
term manager if clarification is needed 
regarding the restrictions associated 
with the recorded conservation 
easement. 
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan 
Upon completion of Site construction, Wildlands will implement the post‐construction monitoring 
defined in Sections 8 and 9. Project maintenance will be performed during the monitoring years to 
address minor issues as necessary (Appendix 8). If, during annual monitoring it is determined the Site’s 
ability to achieve Site performance standards are jeopardized, Wildlands will notify the members of the 
IRT and work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.  

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 34 October 2018 
12.0  Determination of Credits 
Mitigation credit projections are presented in Table 23. The Site is submitted for mitigation credit in the 
Yadkin 03040101. This Site contains five internal easement crossings and the affected length of stream 
within the crossings are excluded from the restored footage and proposed SMU values in the table 
below. The credit ratios proposed for the Site have been developed in consultation with the Interagency 
Review Team (IRT) as summarized in meeting minutes dated August 14, 2017. Note, per a special 
condition of RFP 16‐006993, no more than 10% of the total linear feet of stream offered for mitigation 
can be stream preservation. 
The buffer width falls below the minimum required 30‐foot buffer along approximately 45 linear feet of 
Bull Creek. At this location, the channel design is constrained by topography (a narrow valley) and the 
easement ties into the property boundary, taking advantage of all the available space. This short 
segment of Bull Creek accounts for less than 1% of the total streams within the project. UT1A does not 
maintain a 30‐foot buffer along a minor (less than five feet) length of the channel due to property 
boundary restrictions. The easement along UT2C, near the confluence to Bull Creek, infringes on the 30‐
foot buffer requirement to accommodate an active utility pole. The remaining reaches meet or exceed 
the 30‐foot buffer requirement. Note, more than 12% of the streams will have a buffer width that 
exceeds the 30‐foot requirement. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 35 October 2018 
Table 23: Project Asset Table ‐ Key Mill Mitigation Site 
Mitigation Credits 
  Stream Riparian Wetland Non‐Riparian Wetland Riparian Buffer 
Type R RE R RE R RE  R RE 
Totals 6,038 68 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 
Project Components 
Project Component or 
Reach ID 
Proposed 
Stationing Location 
Approach 
(PI, PII, EII, 
etc.) 
Restoration 
(R) or 
Restoration 
Equivalent 
(RE) 
Restoration 
Length (ft) 
Mitigation 
Ratio 
(X:1) 
Proposed 
Credit1 
Bull Creek ‐ R1A 100+95 ‐ 105+39 Restoration  R 444 1.0 444 
Bull Creek ‐ R1B 105+39 ‐ 112+61 Restoration R 722 1.0 722 
Bull Creek ‐ R2 112+61 ‐ 116+79 Restoration  R 418 1.0 418 
Bull Creek ‐ R3 150+30 ‐ 159+11 Restoration  R 881 1.0 881 
159+63 ‐ 167+56 Restoration  R 793 1.0 793 
Bull Creek ‐ R4 167+56 ‐ 174+39 Preservation RE 683 10.0 68 
UT1A 200+21 ‐ 203+47 Enhancement II R 326 2.5 130 
203+82 ‐ 208+85 Enhancement II R 503 2.5 201 
UT1B 208+85 ‐ 210+97 Restoration R 212 1.0 212 
UT1C 211+36 ‐ 213+93 Restoration R 257 1.0 257 
UT2A 300+00 ‐ 303+15 Restoration R 315 1.0 315 
UT2B 303+50 ‐ 306+13 Restoration R 263 1.0 263 
UT2C‐ 306+13 ‐ 310+82 Restoration  R 469 1.0 469 
UT2 350+00 ‐ 350+42 Restoration R 42 1.0 42 
UT3A 400+57 ‐ 404+70 Enhancement II R 413 2.5 165 
UT3B 404+70 ‐ 407+77 Restoration R 307 1.0 307 
UT3C 408+12 ‐ 412+24 Restoration R 412 1.0 412 
UT3 450+38 ‐ 450+56 Enhancement II R 18 2.5  7 
Component Summation 
Restoration Level Proposed 
Stream (LF) 
Riparian 
Wetland 
(Acres) 
Non‐Riparian Wetland 
(Acres) 
Buffer 
(Sq.Ft.) 
Upland 
(Acres) 
Restoration 5,535 N/A N/A N/A  N/A 
Enhancement 1,260 N/A N/A N/A  N/A 
Preservation 683 N/A N/A N/A  N/A 
1. Internal crossings excluded from the stationing listed above and the credit computations. 
2. Lengths and mitigation credits rounded down to the nearest whole number. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 36 October 2018 
13.0 References 
Chartrand, S.M., Jellinek, M., Whiting, P.J., Stamm, J. 2011. Geometric scaling of step‐pools in mountain 
streams: Observations and implications. Geomorphology 129:141‐151. 
Dunne, T. and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman and Company. New 
York.  
Giese, G.I and Robert R. Mason Jr. 1993. Low‐Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina. U.S. 
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2403. 
Harman et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. AWRA 
Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings. Edited by: D. S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy. AWRA Summer 
Symposium. Bozeman, MT.  
Harman, W. R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function Based 
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843‐K‐12‐006. 
Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis. 1993. Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis, Water 
Resour. Res., 29(2), 271–281, doi:10.1029/92WR01980. 
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resources 
Management. 1996. Rapid Stream Assessment Technique (RSAT) Field Methods. Montgomery County, 
Maryland. 
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Web Soil Survey of Surry County. 
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm  
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), 2016. 
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance August 2016. 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), 2015. 
Closeout Template Guidance Version 2.1 February 2015. 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), 2015. 
Closeout Report Template Version 2.1 March 2015. 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), 2015. 
Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance April 2015. 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), 2014. As‐
Built Baseline Monitoring Report Template February 2014. 
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Division of Mitigation Services, 2009. Upper Yadkin  
Pee‐Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities. 
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/PublicFolder/Work%20With/Watershed%20Planners/Upper_Yadkin_RBRP_
2009.pdf 
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2011. Surface Water Classifications. 
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water‐resources/planning/classification‐standards/classifications  
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2016. Mineral Resources. 
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy‐mineral‐land‐resources/north‐carolina‐geological‐
survey/ncgs‐maps/1985‐geologic‐map‐of‐nc  
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale. 
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database, 
Surry County, NC. 

Key Mill Mitigation Site  Draft Mitigation Plan 
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 37 October 2018 
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 2015. North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan. Raleigh, NC 
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169‐199. 
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal 
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001. 
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth 
Approximateion. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 
Shields, D. F., Copeland, R. R, Klingman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., and Simon, A. 2003. Design for Stream 
Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(8):  575‐582. 
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and 
Landforms 14(1):11‐26. 
Simon, A., Darby, S.E., 1997. Process‐form interactions in unstable sand‐bed river channels: a numerical 
modeling approach. Geomorphology 21, 85–106. 
Simon, A., Dickerson, W., Heins, 2004b. Suspended‐sediment transport rates at the 1.5‐year recurrence 
interval for ecoregions of the United States: transport conditions at the bankfull and effective 
discharge? Geomorphology 58, 243–262. 
Simon, A., Hupp, C.R., 1986. Channel evolution in modified Tennessee channels. Proceedings, Fourth 
Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Las Vegas,March 24–27, 1986, vol. 2, pp. 5–71–5–
82.  
Simon, A., Langendoen, E., Bingner, R., Wells, R.R., Yuan, Y., Alonso, C., 2004a. Suspended‐sediment 
transport and bed‐material characteristics of Shades Creek, Alabama and Ecoregion 67: developing 
water‐quality criteria for suspended and bed‐material sediment. National Sedimentation Laboratory 
Technical Report, vol. 43. 150 pp. 
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Services‐(NRCS), 2018. 
Web Soil Survey (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm 
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2016. Federal Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of 
Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District. 
October 24, 2016.  
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal 
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Surry County, NC. 
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/Yadkin.html  
Walker, Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.  

Figures
Key Mill Mitigation Site

®qMOUNT AIRY/SURRY COUNTY
Mount Airy
Pilot Mountain
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Easement
Pilot Mountain State Park
03040101090030
03040101110020
03040101110040
03040101100010
03040101110050
03040101110060
03040101090040
03040101110010
Ararat River
Heatherly Creek
Lovills Creek (Lovell Creek)
03040101090050
03040101110030
0 1 2 Miles
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC¹
Project Location
Hydrologic Unit Code (14-Digit)
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
NC Natural Heritage Program Areas
Targeted Local Watershed
®q Airports
303d Listed Streams
0 250 500 Feet
Figure 2 Site Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Existing Wetlands
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Non Project Stream
Reach Breaks
Cross-Section
Contours (4 ft)
¹
2014 Aerial ImageryUT1AUT3
UT2 UT2A
UT2B UT2C
UT3A
UT3B
UT3C UT1BUT1CWetland C
Wetland A
Wetland B
Wetland D
Wetland E
Wetland F
XS1R
XS2PXS3RXS10R
XS
1
6
P
X
S
1
1
R
XS13RXS12RX
S
1
4
RXS15R
XS4R XS5RXS6PXS7R
XS8R
XS9P
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull CreekR
e
a
c
h

4Reach 1AReach
1B
Reach 2
Reach 3Reach 3
U
T
1
Figure 3 Watershed Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Bull Creek Watershed (1,293 ac)Proposed Conservation EasementUT1A-C Watershed (102 ac)UT2A-C Watershed (32 ac)UT2 Watershed (6 ac)UT3A-C Watershed (45 ac)Project StreamsNon-Project StreamsTopographic Contours (20')
Surry County, NC
0 1,500750 Feet
2014 Aerial Photography
¹
0 1,000500 Feet Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
¹
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Key Mill, USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle
ArA
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
CsA
CsA
FsE
FsE
FeD2
FeD2
0 250 500 Feet Figure 5 Soils Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Soils
ArA
CsA
FeD2
FsE
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Non Project Stream
¹
2014 Aerial Imagery
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull Creek
ArA
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
CsA
CsA
FsE
FsE
FeD2
FeD2
0 250 500 Feet Figure 5 Soils Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Soils
ArA
CsA
FeD2
FsE
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Non Project Stream
¹
2014 Aerial Imagery
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull Creek
#*0 250 500 Feet
Figure 6 Concept Design Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossings
Proposed Streams
Restoration
Enhancment II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Non Project Stream
Reach Breaks
#*Proposed BMP
¹
2014 Aerial ImageryUT1AUT3
UT2 UT2A
UT2B UT2C
UT3A
UT3B
UT3CUT1BUT1CCrossing 3
35' Internal Crossing
Crossing 2
39' Internal Crossing
Crossing 4
35' Internal Crossing
Crossing 5
52' Internal Crossing
Crossing 1
35' Internal CrossingReach 1AReach
1B
Rea
c
h

2
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Reach 3Reach 3R
e
a
c
h

4
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
#*
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
6
UT to Sandy Run 6UT to South Fork Catawba6UT to Catawba River Reach 1 & 2 6Key Mill Site
6Box Creek 6UT to Gap Branch6UT to Kelly Branch 6Timber Trib
Figure 7 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101Surry County, NC¹
1
#*Project Location
!(Reference Reach
0 147 Miles
y = 89.039x0.7223R² = 0.9069y = 55.699x0.7855R² = 0.9931y = 64.839x0.4314R² = 0.95741101001000100000.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100Discharge (cfs)Drainage Area (square miles)Key Mill Discharge AnalysisRural Piedmont Regional CurvesAlan Walker CurveRural Lower 95% LimitRural Upper 95% LimitRegional Flood Requency Analysis - 1.2-yr PredictionsSelect Reference Reaches for CurveDesign DischargesPower (Rural Piedmont Regional Curves)Power (Alan Walker Curve)Power (Select Reference Reaches for Curve)
Bull Creek Reach 1A1Bull Creek Reach 2Bull Creek Reach 3UT1B2UT2A3UT2UT3B4DA (acres)1,045 1,147 1,293 100 33 4 47DA (sq. mi.)1.63 1.79 2.02 0.16 0.05 0.01 0.07Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs) Qbkf (cfs)1-yr event38 41 46 6 2 1 3 1.2-yr event111 119 130 20 9 3 11 1.5-yr event157 168 183 29 13 4 16 1.8-yr event192 205 223 36 16 5 20 2-yr event209 205 243 40 17 5 22 XS191 - -- - - - XS2105 - -- - - - XS4- - 98 - - - - XS5- - 101 - - - - XS7- - 164 -- - - XS8- - 164 -- - - XS10- - -14 -- - XS11- - -34 -- - XS12- - -- 11 - -XS13- - -- 17 - -XS14- - -- - - 11 XS15- - -- - - 17 low range45 48 53 8 4 1 5 exact calc127 136 148 23 10 2 14 high range358 383 416 68 31 7 40 Alan Walker Curveexact calc82 88 97 13 5 1 7 1,484 - 735 905 34 - 91 1,231 - 922 1,159 62 - 102 Qbkf from Reference Reach Curveexact calc80 83 88 29 18 8 21 Final Design Q90 99 116 19 7 3 12 Notes: 1 Bull Creek Reach 1A drainage characteristics applied to Bull Creek Reach 1B23 UT2A drainage characteristics applied to UT2B and UT2C4 UT3B drainage characteristics applied to UT3CUT1B drainage characteristics applied to UT1CPiedmont Regional CurveUSGS Peak Discharge Estimation for NC Rural PiedemontManning's equation at surveyed TOBMax QManning's equation at surveyed XS from Mecklenburg spreadsheets
GFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGF!A!A!A!A!A!A0 250 500 Feet Figure 9 Proposed Monitoring Plan
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin 03040101
Surry County, NC
Project Site
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Vegetation Plot
Permanent
Mobile
Proposed Streams
Restoration
Enhancment II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Non Project Stream
Cross-Sections
Reach Breaks
!A Stream/Crest Gage
!A Stream Gage
GF Photo Points
¹
2014 Aerial ImageryReach 1ARea
c
h

2
Reach 3R
e
a
c
h

4 UT1AUT3
UT2 UT2A
UT2B
Reach 3UT2C
UT3AUT3B
UT3CUT1BUT1CReach
1B
Crossing 3
30' Easement Break
Crossing 2
30' Easement Break
Crossing 4
30' Easement Break
Crossing 5
50' Easement Break
Crossing 1
30' Easement Break
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k

Appendix 1 – Historical Aerial Photos
Key Mill Mitigation Site

The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Key Mill
483 Key Road
Ararat, NC 27007
December 07, 2016
4799004.1
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein arethe property of their respective owners.
page-
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Year Details SourceScale
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Site Name: Client Name:
2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2008 1"=500'Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP
1993 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 28, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1982 1"=500'Flight Date: March 28, 1982 USGS
1976 1"=1000'Flight Date: February 12, 1976 USGS
1966 1"=750'Flight Date: March 21, 1966 USGS
12/07/16
Key Mill Wildlands Eng, Inc.
483 Key Road 1430 South Mint Street
Ararat, NC 27007 Charlotte, NC 28203
4799004.1 Andrea Eckardt
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
4799004 1 2
4799004.1
2012
= 500'
4799004.1
2010
= 500'
4799004.1
2009
= 500'
4799004.1
2008
= 500'
4799004.1
2006
= 500'
4799004.1
2005
= 500'
4799004.1
1993
= 500'
4799004.1
1982
= 500'
4799004.1
1976
= 1000'
4799004.1
1966
= 750'

Appendix 2 – Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Key Mill Mitigation Site

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2017-01504 County: Surry U.S.G.S, Quad: Mount Airy South
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Win Taylor
Address: 497 Bramson Court, Suite 104
Mt Pleasant, SC 29464
Telephone Number: 843-277-6221 `^
Size (acres): 20 Acres Nearest Town: Mt
Pleasant
Nearest Waterway: Bull Creek Coordinates: 36.3993, -80.60325
River Basin/ HUC: Unser Pee Dee
Location description: The aroieet is located at 483 Key Road, Ararat North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Followine Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the pen -nit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated, As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years fi•om the date of this notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this detennination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S, including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA

jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
perinit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fi•om the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the CIean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext. 4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region (version 2,0). These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks. The stream channel on the property "is known as" Bull Creek which flows into the
Ararat River which flows to the Yadkin River.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on July 25, 2018 and are as
approximately depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map (dated August 23, 2018)
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. Ifyou object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Anny Comps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Roam IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA farm, it must be received at the above address by NIA (Preliminary -JD).
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Divisio cc if y u do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
illiam Elliott
Issue Date of JD: October 17, .2018 Expiration Date: NIA Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmgpu.-Lisace.army.mil/em gpex/f7p=136:4:0.
Copy ft-nished:
Linda Faye Kee 483 Key Road, Ararat NC 27007,
Zacharey Neil Hardy 728 Key Road, Ararat NC 27007

SECTION i - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at httt)://www.tisace armv.Emil/MissionslCiviI Woi-kslRe 7u, latoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenninations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: if you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain teens and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you wilt forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
pennit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address soiree of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the pennit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered pennit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pennit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pennit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenninations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a pennit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
■ APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section It of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND '
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
A
licant: Win Taylor File Number: SAW -SAW -2017-01504 I Date. October 17, 2018
Attached is: See Section below-
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
I❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
N
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION i - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at httt)://www.tisace armv.Emil/MissionslCiviI Woi-kslRe 7u, latoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenninations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: if you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain teens and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you wilt forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
pennit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address soiree of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the pennit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered pennit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pennit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the pennit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional detenninations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: if you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a pennit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
■ APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section It of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this fonn to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional 'information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: William Elliott
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
828-271-7980, ext. 4232
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the o ortunity to partici2ate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: October 17, 2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Win Taylor
497 Bramso❑ Court, Suite 104
Mt Pleasant, SC 29464
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -2017-01504,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The project is Iocated at 483 Key Road, Ararat North Carolina
State: NC County/parish/borough: Surry City: Mt Pleasant
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 36.3993, -80.60325
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Naineofnearest waterbody: Bull Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Z Office (Desk) Determination. Date: October 17, 2018
0 Field Determination. Date(s): July 25, 2018
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site
Centered Coordinates
Estimated A mount
Type of Aquatic
Geographic
Number
(decimal degrees)
of Aquatic Resource
Resources
Authority to Which
in Review Area
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
See Enclosed
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
Table
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 101404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 101404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
Nan -wetland Waters
❑ Section 101404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Nan -wetland Waters
❑ Section 101404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Nan -wetland Waters
❑ Section 101404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual pennit, or a Nationwide General
Pennit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
pen -nit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the pen -nit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual pen -nit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terns
and conditions contained thei•cin), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation ofjurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report,
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
0 Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS S and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute Mount Airy South Quadrangle
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
[] FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs:❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2014
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily_
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of d
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
701
Sigriature-arta date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

S
t
i
�C
"C'IC_E
W
c_
F
"n
rtD
rD
� W
C C
C
m
E N
N —�
-�
n
C S
73a
CL CL
Q
_0
d Q
rD
N
n
m Q
n
m D ry
rD
S
i
W
m
w w
m rn
w
m
w w
m m
ur
m
w w w
m m p
w
m
w
rn
i
W
lir li.e
uo
Ul
UD LO
VI �o
W
14
i�r
w w w
�
w
[D
i r
lP
.
00
0
V y�!
(ji
[n
417 Lrl p
p
l0 w Ln
w
Ln
W
V
Lri
In
L71
I
C00
LO
�'
N
Lrl
N
N 00
Q 0
Lr
In
V4 O1
1 0o O
00
CO
w
41
m
N
-F
00
p
W
O Q
00
p
00 00
Q p
00.
Q
90 00
O Q Q
O
83
O
O
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
CT) rn m
a
0-
a,
o
V
m
co
w N
Lrl
�Q
N N Ol
V
VCL
[n
Q
O 61
4 N
coO
LO
N
00 Ql
O
V
O CY) Lrl
Ol In lO
N
Ncc
N
rD
C
C C C
w
DJ
Di n
n
n n n
_
C
C r-
�
c
O O O
C
rD
C
fD
rr+
r�nr -rti
rF
rr
O
O Q ❑
— —
7
mm
r^aD
p
� ro
m
m Z)
--
o-
a CL a
rD
yr
rD
�n
rt
a
mm
3
m
Q
m
3
m m
3 3
(0
Q
fP rb rD
a a
¢
0i
C1
rD
rD b
rb
fil rD
m
[� m
3
3
H
a
4
to
rD
l0 to
O
0
O O O
0
r�
w
Z)
0. a
n �
C) 0
Q O O
rD
a
a
C2 -
r+
rr
r+
r+ It
3
3
3 3 3
m
rD
Ln 0'
c m
n a
fD a
D
Q O
O
4 O
N
l0 Y
IN
In
�'
O
O O
N
DN
<D
LO W
.�
V
rD C
LD
N N
O
w co
W
O
�. M
a�
rD
ai
rt
ri
rD m
rib
r�
Z
Z Z
Z
Z Z
rr°_r a
-
rD r+ rD � m
O
Z
rD
fl
D
7
O O
O
7
O ❑
7
rt
v rD
7
rr 7
pi rD iv ❑
rt -i r -F
ni
rt
m �-
rt
v
in
in
Ln in
in
cn to
3
r1 3 �'r�D
m
m u,
rD r9
fb rt) rD N
rD rD
rb m rD rD
'�
z rt N Z
Z LA
N -airy
O
r+ n
rk rF
r+
rF r+
a
rt
wrD
o
❑ i O Q
❑ , OO
O
nrr
=I D
m O Z) O
n O
O O
rD h
r* '� rDrD r+ �. O
r+
n .O
t? ❑
° a
°
v Z
m u Z rD
rD,
m `C
m ami
O
O O
O
O O
O O
Z,
C rD Q O C rD
11
C m
n
r+
rY U1
U7
U1 41
7r
rD
a 3 p
a rD
5
a
=I
a

Wetland f (DP9) '
•. .'
Wetland D (DP6) J" '
UT1---
xUpland (DP7) f,
r•r \r - r. y
r\\ Wetland E T3
S
1 •_.S - ti r .
! j Upland (D138) i
♦' ` r UT3 !
Wetland B
r •'� . Upland.(D P.3) - -
W ,
Bulk Creek . Wetland A (DPZ)
�"! _#�: • la "was $4// C
UTZ`
Upland (DP5) `'..
•i
T Wetland C (DP4)
Upland (DPI)
��'�" •'rte �h
Delineated Wetlands
Intermittent Non -Wetland Waters
�� Perennial Non -Wetland Waters

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP1
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain none <1
MLRA 136 N 36.394750 W -80.599429
Colvard and Suches (CsA) n/a
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
Acer rubrum
Betula nigra
Fagus grandifolia
Pinus taeda
Liriodendron tulipifera 30
20
10
10
5
75
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
FACU
FAC
FACW
FACU
FAC
1
5
20
00
15'10 20
Magnolia tripetala
Ilex opaca
Ligustrum sinense
30
15
40
85
Yes
No
Yes
FACU
FACU
FACU
25 75
130 520
00
165 615
3.7
5'
Polystichum acrostichoides 5
5
Yes FACU
30'
0
✔
Upland - DP1
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-12
12-14
7.5YR 4/4
7.5YR 4/6
100
100
Loam
Loam
✔
Upland - DP1
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Wetlands A & B - DP2
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain bench concave 0
MLRA 136 N 36.395180 W -80.602126
Colvard and Suches (CsA) n/a
✔
✔✔
✔
✔✔
✔
Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing.
✔
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔0 - 12+
✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
0
15'
0
✔
5'
Juncus effusus
Carex bullata
50
35
85
Yes
Yes
FACW
OBL
30'
0
✔
Wetlands A & B - DP2
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-5
5-10
10-14
2.5Y 5/2
2.5Y 5/3
2.5Y 5/2
90
85
100
7.5YR 4/6
7.5YR 4/6
10
15
C
C
PL
PL
Silty Sand
Sand
Sandy Silt
✔
Wetlands A & B - DP2
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland C - DP4
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain concave 0
MLRA 136 N 36.395052 W -80.602889
Colvard and Suches (CsA) n/a
✔
✔✔
✔
✔✔
✔
Vegetation significantly disturbed due to livestock grazing.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
0
2
2
100
15'
0
✔
5'
Juncus effusus
Festuca paradoxa
Eupatorium capillifolium
60
30
10
100
Yes
Yes
No
FACW
FAC
FACU
30'
0
✔
Wetland C - DP4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-4
4-14
2.5Y 5/2
2.5Y 5/3
85
75
5YR 5/8
5YR 5/8
15
25
C
C
PL
PL
Silt Loam
Silt Loam
✔
✔
Wetland C - DP4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP5
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain none <1
MLRA 136 N 36.395188 W -80.602659
Colvard and Suches (CsA) n/a
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
0
1
1
100
00
15'10 20
0
25 75
130 520
00
165 615
3.7
5'
Festuca paradoxa
Eupatorium capillifolium
80
10
90
Yes
No
FAC
FACU
30'
0
✔
Upland - DP5
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-3
3-14
10YR 4/4
10YR 4/6
100
100
Loam
Sandy Loam
✔
Upland - DP5
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Wetlands D & E- DP6
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Linear seep concave 0
MLRA 136 N 36.397724 W -80.604762
Arkaqua loam (ArA) n/a
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
✔
Concave depression devoid of vegetation.
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔2
✔0-12+
✔0-12+✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
0
15'
0
5'
✔
0
30'
0
✔
Concave depression devoid of vegetation.
Wetlands D & E- DP6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-3
3-14
10YR 4/1
10YR 4/1
95
100
10YR 5/6 5 C PL Silt Loam
Silt Loam
✔
✔
Wetlands D & E- DP6
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP7
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain none <1
MLRA 136 N 36.397690 W -80.604714
Arkaqua loam (ArA) n/a
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus phellos
Acer rubrum 60
10
10
80
Yes
No
No
FAC
FACU
FAC
2
3
66
00
15'00
Ligustrum sinense 20
20
Yes FACU
150 450
30 120
00
180 570
3.2
5'
Microstegium vimineum 80
90
Yes FAC
30'
0
✔
Upland - DP7
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-14 5YR 5/6 100 Loam
✔
Upland - DP7
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 12/13/2017
Wildlands Engineering NC Upland - DP8
Ian Eckardt and Win Taylor
Floodplain concave 0
MLRA 136 N 36.397541 W -80.604599
Arkaqua loam (ArA) n/a
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 60
10
70
Yes
No
FACW
FACU
3
4
75
00
15'60 120
Ligustrum sinense 5
0
Yes FACU
95 285
15 60
00
170 465
2.74
✔
5'
Microstegium vimineum
Festuca paradoxa
70
25
95
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
30'
0
✔
Upland - DP8
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-1
1-14
7.5Y 2/2
7.5Y 4/6
100
100
Loam
Loam
✔
Upland - DP8
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

Key Mill Mitigation Site Mount Airy/Stokes 7/11/2018
Wildlands Engineering NC Wetland F- DP9
Win Taylor
Seep concave <1
MLRA 136 N 36.398892 W -80.605750
Arkaqua loam (ArA) n/a
✔
✔✔
✔
✔✔
✔
Area mowed as part of pasture area.
✔✔
✔
✔
✔
✔0.5
✔0-12+
✔0-12+✔
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
30'
0
15'
0
✔
5'
Leersia oryzoides
Persicaria lapathifolia
5
1
6
Yes
No
OBL
FACW
30'
0
✔
Concave depression devoid of vegetation.
Wetland F- DP9
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

0-6
6-12
10YR 3/1
10YR 4/1
95
100
10YR 5/6 5 C PL Silt Loam
Silt Loam
✔
✔
Wetland F- DP9

Appendix 3 – DWR Stream Identification Forms
Key Mill Mitigation Site

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: _ _ (4-
Project/Site: M y ! t
Evaluator: L _ County:
Total Points: ( p
Stream is at least intermittent c
Stream Determination ir le-
/�
if >_ 19 or Perennial ifz 30' `T� Ephemeral Intermittent 7elrei
A. Geombr holo (Subtotal =_- 9
Absent
__J
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
ripple -pool sequence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
2
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
-see
No = 0
artificial ditches are not rated; in manual
0.5
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
1.5
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
p
14. Leaf litter }� 6t/ ; 1 f C ,r - ��T �u r fCs
1.5
15, Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 j
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0
26, Wetland plants in streambed
-FA
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p. 35 of manual
Sketch:
Latitude: 3 (0 Y 39 43z
Longitude: -�(� (p 0
Other- g UaJ
e.g. Quad Name: C_ Q_e_�e_
Weak
Moderate
Stron
1
2
3)
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
Yes=3
i 2
1 2 3
1 0.5 0
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
(YF--'; a
2 1 0
2 1 0
1 2 3
1 2 3
0.5 1 1-5
0.5 1 1-5
0.5 1
1.5
1.5
075, -bBL = 1.5 Other= 0-�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4AI
Date: 1 l� -
Project/Site:. t 1 I
Latitude: _� io U L., �?Ic{ 14,
Evaluator: T
County: S i� Y V. ,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent L
Stream Determination (circ}}eon@@)
Ephemeral Intermittent Plerennial
OtherI
Quad Name: T `
if ?i 19 or perennial if >_ 3d`
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g.
A. Geomo holo (Subtotal = - 9' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str ng
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2:1A
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
le ool sequence
0
1
2
ari
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1 J
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7_ Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
Notes: i (,i c
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
i cr1 Y S' CA
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal = � " )
12. Presence of Baseitow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0-) 1
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
3
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = j
1 J
C. Biology (Subtotal =I L )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
(=,37)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22_ Fish
0
0.5
1 J
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24_ Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
-FAGW= 0:75
ORL=-Jf 5--C tJ F=O==
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p_ 35 of manual_
Notes: i (,i c
i10 s
{ 1-41"t
i cr1 Y S' CA
Sketch:
SGr�P Q
G rlC { n rt o'i
P,?� C k s

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I CO -1 3-
ProjectlSite: V--Rf Mk `j
Latitude: 3 ! 3
Evaluator: --C� ��
County: S U Y Y CC,
Longitude: , 04 6
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cir on
Ephemeral Intermittent erenni I
Other . I
e.g. Quad Name: ` k -T:)\
if 19 orperennial if? 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1 =::
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7-. '5-
12.
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0",
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
2
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = $,!)7' ) `J
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0,
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
L = 1 5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ay-ni
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: j - - �-
ProjectlSite: 1G f� l
Latitude: a w ,yt 3 ,;� I c
Evaluator: -e0- u
County: �S LA Co
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Detormi do circle one)
Other
u T d
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 orperennial if? 30'
Ephemeral Int tTitten Perennial I
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I I - )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str ng
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
No = 0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
Q
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
CUD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = �ib
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual ~�
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3 '
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1'
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
Co.-
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
+ Yes =
1.5
C. Biologv (Subtotal = Y� )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 -'
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1';
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 _
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
9
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: t,
i I l
n C in.t
u - vt
wd
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 �/
Date: t' I� 1 I '�- ProjectlSite: b�� `�l t Latitude: 3�, 7. k S -4c
Evaluator:
l 1, CLongitude: `�0, C ff 5
� �-� (,L_ �Tl,��'�.J County- � 4
Total Points: Stream Determination (circi j Other T2
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent P renn al a -g- Quad Name: L d t Lt R_
if >_ 19 orperennial if >_ 30" 7
A- Geomorphology (Subtotal= I'S '� }
Absent
Weak
Moderate 11
Strong
V- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
-(2)
3
3. irt-channel structure: ex- riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
12
1
3
ri le oI s Bence -
0
0.5
'
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
5. Acfivelrelict floodplain
0
1)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
'perennial streams may also be identified usin other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
01
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 '
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11- Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
-artificial ditches are not rates; see a,scussrons In ma[Kdi
12- Presence of $aseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No= 0
es =
1.5
n n: tom.... ic..r,a ,4� ,t - t N
18. Fibrous roots in st(eambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2 �'
21. Aquatic M1rlollusks
0
1
2 -fir
3
22, Fish
rk
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0-5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1'
1-5
26. Welland plants in streambed
- I=AG�F11=9 oBL - 1-. Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified usin other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: GVxtrUrAG &5 M(A VW Yn U
1VilaL
1
Sketch:
c+nah
1�- -Q G -v
oes
0 -
-5 ,t s�� �e
-S 5 +t eve
�P5'
Derrt1,
� n+ �V- rj'r V"e_ C. C_� � f P1
c pl� ; & QS
P = P, Pe, (�
E = -e f h iM t rrtN �t �i

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.1.1
Date:
Project/Site: 4 f 1
I
Latitude:
Evaluator: A
County: S LAY
Longitude: 0 tvc I Im
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
(circle one)
Stream De�Innt
Other (�U-T _j
vt
if z 19 or perennial if ? 30` ��
Ephemera Perennial -
e.g. Quad Name:
A, Geomb ho! (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0.5
3
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
Cy
3
3. In -channel structure_ ex_ riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
C,
2
3
-ripple-poolsequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2)
3
7. Recent alluvial depositst)
0
1
2
3
B. Headc uts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
1 D
0.5
1
i.
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch: l� CC vl nK S 1 Y1 i U()4
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B- Hvdrolonv (Subtotal = (,l 1 '�' )
12. Presence of 0aseflow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in stfeambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 )
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 �
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1 `
2
3
22. Fish
0,'
5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
l)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed-
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: R U M u L vp i i1 t f ' bt
b u
f
+ is
ci C.
Sketch: l� CC vl nK S 1 Y1 i U()4
W

Appendix 4 – Existing, Proposed, and Reference Reach
Geomorphic Data
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Key Mill Mitigation Sitemin max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage areaDAsq mibankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSF 18.7 21.6 18.7 21.6 18.7 21.6 26.2 39.5 3.9 6.8 3.9 6.8avg velocity during bankfull eventvbkffps 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.2 4.3 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.0width at bankfullwbkffeet 16.2 19.1 16.2 19.1 16.2 19.1 18.0 25.4 5.6 7.0 5.6 7.0maximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 1.8 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.6 2.7 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5mean depth at bankfulldbkffeet 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.1 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.0bankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkf14.1 16.8 14.1 16.8 14.1 16.8 8.5 22.5 7.3 8.1 7.3 8.1low bank heightfeet 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.8 4.8 5.6 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7bank height ratioBHR‐3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1 1.9 2.8 5.0 7.9 5.0 7.9floodprone area widthwfpafeet 21 25 21 25 21 25 27 53 14 17 14 17entrenchment ratioER‐1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5max pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeet1.5 2.3pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf‐0.9 0.9 2.6 3.7 2.6 3.7pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet28.7 46.2pool width ratiowpool/wbkf‐0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.9 1.6 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.3Bankfull pool cross‐sectional area ApoolSF41.2 56.7pool area ratioApool/Abkf‐2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 1.3 1.2 2.4 4.2 2.4 4.2pool‐pool spacing p‐pfeetN/A N/A 48 262 48 262pool‐pool spacing ratiop‐p/Wbkf‐2.7 3.2 2.7 3.2 2.7 3.2 N/A N/A 8.5 37.4 8.5 37.4valley slopeSvalleyfeet/footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/footsinuosity K‐belt widthwbltfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander width ratiowblt/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander lengthLmfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander length ratioLm/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Alinear wavelengthLWfeetN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Alinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Aradius of curvatureRcfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Aradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A1.68F3Existing Conditions Geomorphic ParametersParameter Notation UnitsBull Creek Reach 1A1Bull Creek Reach 21F31.630.16 0.16G4c G4Bull Creek Reach 1B1UT1B2UT1C2Bull Creek Reach 31.79F3 F3/G3c2.021. Cross‐sections analyzed for Bull Creek Reach 1B considered to be representative of Bull Creek Reach 1A and Reach 2.2. Cross‐sections analyzed for UT1C reach considered to be representative of UT1B.3. The Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1994) is for natural streams. These channels have been heavily manipulated by livestock and man and therefore may not fit the classification category as described by this system. Results of the classification are provided as a basis for discussion of existing channel form.0.0130.016Notes: 0.0270.0080.0100.0120.0240.0370.0091.160.0140.0441.071.301.241.211.19520.0084.514.644.444.44.54.94.514.614.644.44.952524.92.612.816.412.816.42.6
Key Mill Mitigation Sitemin max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage areaDAsq mibankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSF 5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 2.8 4.1 2.8 4.1avg velocity during bankfull eventvbkffps 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.2width at bankfullwbkffeet 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 3.9 5.7 3.9 5.7maximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.2mean depth at bankfulldbkffeet 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7bankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkf3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.8low bank heightfeet 2.7 3.7 2.7 3.7 2.7 3.7 2.7 3.7 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.3bank height ratioBHR‐1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.8 2.7 3.8floodprone area widthwfpafeet 84 112 84 112 84 112 84 112 9 14 9 14entrenchment ratioER‐16.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 1.6 3.5 1.6 3.5max pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool depth ratiodpool/dbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool width at bankfullwpoolfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool width ratiowpool/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABankfull pool cross‐sectional area ApoolSF N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool area ratioApool/Abkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool‐pool spacing p‐pfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Apool‐pool spacing ratiop‐p/Wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Avalley slopeSvalleyfeet/footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/footsinuosity K‐belt widthwbltfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander width ratiowblt/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander lengthLmfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Ameander length ratioLm/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Alinear wavelengthLWfeetN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Alinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Aradius of curvatureRcfeet N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Aradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf‐N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AParameter Notation UnitsExisting Conditions Geomorphic Parameters1.171.071.511.191.071.200.0170.0200.0230.0170.070.070.0360.0160.050.050.010.04UT3B2UT3CG4G5G5cG5UT21UT2A1UT2B1G5G5cUT2C1. Cross‐sections analyzed for reach UT2C considered to be representative of UT2, UT2A, and UT2B.Notes: 3. The Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1994) is for natural streams. These channels have been heavily manipulated by livestock and man and therefore may not fit the classification category as described by this system. Results of the classification areprovided as a basis for discussion of existing channel form.2. Cross‐sections analyzed for reach UT3C considered to be representative of UT3, UT3A, and UT3B.0.0220.064 0.029 0.031 0.0190.047
XS1 Riffle 1-Bull Creek Reach 1Bankfull Dimensions18.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)16.2 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)2.1 max depth (ft)17.6 wetted perimeter (ft)1.1 hydraulic radius (ft)14.1 width-depth ratio20.8 W flood prone area (ft)1.3 entrenchment ratio3.7 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Existing Conditions - 2017View Downstream909294969810010210410670 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS2 Riffle 2-Bull Creek Reach 1Bankfull Dimensions21.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)19.1 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)1.8 max depth (ft)20.4 wetted perimeter (ft)1.1 hydraulic radius (ft)16.8 width-depth ratio25.1 W flood prone area (ft)1.3 entrenchment ratio4.1 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section PlotsExisting Conditions - 2017View Downstream90929496981001021041060 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS3 Pool-Bull Creek Reach 1Bankfull Dimensions44.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)14.6 width (ft)3.0 mean depth (ft)4.9 max depth (ft) 19.9 wetted perimeter (ft)2.2 hydraulic radius (ft)4.8 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Existing Conditions - 2017View Downstream8890929496981001021040 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ PoolExisting ConditionsBankfull
Bankfull Dimensions26.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)21.2 width (ft)1.2 mean depth (ft)1.8 max depth (ft)22.3 wetted perimeter (ft)1.2 hydraulic radius (ft)17.2 width-depth ratio49.0 W flood prone area (ft)2.3 entrenchment ratio2.8 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025 Existing Conditions - 2017XS4 Riffle 1-Bull Creek Reach 3View Downstream9496981001021041060 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions28.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)25.4 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)1.6 max depth (ft)26.8 wetted perimeter (ft)1.1 hydraulic radius (ft)22.5 width-depth ratio32.6 W flood prone area (ft)1.3 entrenchment ratio3.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025 Existing Conditions - 2017XS5 Riffle 2-Bull Creek Reach 3View Downstream9496981001021041060 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions41.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)28.7 width (ft)1.4 mean depth (ft)2.3 max depth (ft)29.9 wetted perimeter (ft)1.4 hydraulic radius (ft)20.0 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025 Existing Conditions - 2017XS6 Pool-Bull Creek Reach 3View Downstream929496981001021041061080 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ PoolExisting ConditionsBankfull
Bankfull Dimensions37.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)18.0 width (ft)2.1 mean depth (ft)2.7 max depth (ft)19.9 wetted perimeter (ft)1.9 hydraulic radius (ft)8.5 width-depth ratio52.9 W flood prone area (ft)2.9 entrenchment ratio1.9 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025 Existing Conditions - 2017XS7 Riffle 3-Bull Creek Reach 3View Downstream8890929496981001021041060 102030405060708090Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions39.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)19.3 width (ft)2.0 mean depth (ft)2.5 max depth (ft)22.2 wetted perimeter (ft)1.8 hydraulic radius (ft)9.4 width-depth ratio27.0 W flood prone area (ft)1.4 entrenchment ratio2.3 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025 Existing Conditions - 2017XS8 Riffle 4-Bull Creek Reach 3View Downstream86889092940 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS9 Pool-Bull Creek Reach 3Bankfull Dimensions56.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)46.2 width (ft)1.2 mean depth (ft)1.5 max depth (ft) 48.0 wetted perimeter (ft)1.2 hydraulic radius (ft)37.6 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section PlotsExisting Conditions - 2017View Downstream878991939597991010 102030405060708090100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ PoolExisting ConditionsBankfull
XS16 Pool-UT1Bankfull Dimensions16.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)12.8 width (ft)1.3 mean depth (ft)2.6 max depth (ft) 14.2 wetted perimeter (ft)1.2 hydraulic radius (ft)10.0 width-depth ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Existing Conditions - 2017View Downstream90929496981001021040 102030405060708090100110120Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ PoolExisting ConditionsBankfull
XS10 Riffle 1-UT1Bankfull Dimensions3.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)5.6 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.0 max depth (ft)7.8 wetted perimeter (ft)0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)8.1 width-depth ratio14.0 W flood prone area (ft)2.5 entrenchment ratio7.9 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross-Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Existing Conditions - 2017View Downstream929496981001021040 1020304050607080Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS11 Riffle 2-UT1Bankfull Dimensions6.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)7.0 width (ft)1.0 mean depth (ft)1.5 max depth (ft) 8.1 wetted perimeter (ft)0.8 hydraulic radius (ft)7.3 width-depth ratio17.1 W flood prone area (ft)2.4 entrenchment ratio5.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section PlotsExisting Conditions - 2017View Downstream90929496981001021040 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS12 Riffle 1-UT2Bankfull Dimensions5.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)5.3 width (ft)1.1 mean depth (ft)2.0 max depth (ft)6.9 wetted perimeter (ft)0.8 hydraulic radius (ft)4.8 width-depth ratio84.1 W flood prone area (ft)16.0 entrenchment ratio1.4 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section PlotsExisting Conditions - 2017View Downstream9597991011031050 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS13 Riffle 2-UT2Bankfull Dimensions7.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)5.3 width (ft)1.4 mean depth (ft)1.9 max depth (ft)7.1 wetted perimeter (ft)1.1 hydraulic radius (ft)3.7 width-depth ratio111.5 W flood prone area (ft)21.2 entrenchment ratio1.9 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamExisting Conditions - 2017Key Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section Plots9496981001021041060 102030405060708090100110Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS14 Riffle 1-UT3Bankfull Dimensions2.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)3.9 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)0.8 max depth (ft)4.9 wetted perimeter (ft)0.6 hydraulic radius (ft)5.4 width-depth ratio13.7 W flood prone area (ft)3.5 entrenchment ratio3.8 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section PlotsExisting Conditions - 2017View Downstream1001021041060 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
XS15 Riffle 2-UT3Bankfull Dimensions4.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)5.7 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.2 max depth (ft) 6.5 wetted perimeter (ft)0.6 hydraulic radius (ft)7.8 width-depth ratio9.1 W flood prone area (ft)1.6 entrenchment ratio2.7 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 12/2017Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringView DownstreamExisting Conditions - 2017Key Mill Mitigation Site NCDMS Project No. 100025Cross-Section Plots981001021041060 102030405060708090Elevation (ft)Width (ft)+ RiffleExisting ConditionsBankfullFloodprone Area
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage areaDAsq midesign dischargeQcfs26 32bankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSF11.4 17.55.7 6.210.7 11.1average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpsCross‐Sectionwidth at bankfull wbkffeet9.7 12.4 7.3 7.88.2 11.2maximum depth at bankfull dmaxfeet1.1 1.41.5 1.6mean depth at bankfull dbkffeet1.2 1.4 0.7 0.81.0 1.4bankfull width to depth ratio wbkf/dbkf8.1 8.96.6 9.86.0 11.7 17.0 17.5depth ratiodmax/dbkffeet1.2 1.4 1.6 1.81.3 1.4bank height ratio BHR0.9 1.4 0.8 1.3 1.7 2.61.8 2.1 1.0 2.4floodprone area widthwfpafeet52.0 79.012.2 15.614.7 18.5entrenchment ratioER5.4 6.41.6 2.11.5 1.9Slopevalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slope Schnlfeet/ footProfileriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot0.0114 0.0605 0.0142 0.3451 0.0036 0.0420 0.0063 0.0770 0.0110 0.1400 0.0120 0.0320 0.0230 0.1700riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schnl2.5 13.3 0.5 12.8 0.2 2.8 0.8 9.20.2 2.1 1.8 4.8 0.7 5.2pool slopeSpfeet/ foot0.0012 0.0030 0.0025 0.0221 0.0000 0.0070 0.0210 0.0810 0.0041 0.0610 0.0000 0.0090 0.0000 0.0370pool slope ratioSp/Schnl0.3 0.7 0.1 0.8 0.00.51.23.80.10.90.01.30.01.1pool‐to‐pool spacingLp‐pfeet31 60 19 46 9 55 29 88 18 27 36 149 13 49pool spacing ratio Lp‐p/wbkf2.8 5.4 1.6 3.8 1.3 7.0 1.2 3.83.0 4.4 3.7 15.3 1.4 5.6pool cross‐sectional areaApoolSF5.5 8.7pool area ratio Apool/Abkf1.0 1.61.0 1.4maximum pool depthdpoolfeet1.3 1.5pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf1.8 2.11.9 1.9pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet7.6 9.2pool width ratio wpool/wbkf0.8 1.11.0 1.2PatternsinuosityKbelt widthwbltfeet24 60 62 88 18 34 25 56meander width ratio wblt/wbkf4.4 5.73.3 7.6 2.6 3.7 2.3 4.32.6 5.8linear wavelength (formerly meander length) Lmfeet65 107 52 79 6372397627 94 54151linear wavelength ratio (formerly meander length ratio)Lm/wbkf6.7 8.6 4.2 6.4 8.6 9.2 1.7 3.2 N/A N/A5.6 15.6meander lengthfeetN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/Ameander length ratioN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/Aradius of curvatureRcfeet31 56 29 52 14 29 7 38 8 26 9 28radius of curvature ratio Rc/ wbkf2.8 5.1 2.4 4.2 1.9 3.8 0.3 1.60.9 2.9Particle Size Distribution from Reach‐wide Pebble d50 Descriptiond16mmd35mmd50mmd84mmd95mmd100mm1.7E411.510.11.6Description Notation UnitsUT to Catawba R1UT to Catawba R25.51.10.6REFERENCE REACHES1.72.14.61.601.600.040.230.05E5E3b/C3bB4cB4809928.9Timber TribUT to Sandy RunBox CreekUT to Kelly BranchUT to Gap BranchUT to South Fork Catawba13.23.86.15.02.73.70.15208018.717B4/B4a0.08235.7B4a or A4C42.130.51.91.20.73.412.36.28.923.55.97.91.10.73.41.71.00.06800.03220.0067N/A0.01060.0290N/A0.00801.053.020.91.50.02004.33.413.61.51.52.4N/AN/A1.91.4N/A7.115.0N/AN/A6.110.0N/A18.8N/AN/A2.52.1N/A3.6N/A1.11.1‐‐‐1.31N/A1.01.0N/A3.50.30.50.378.90.490.062N/AN/A14.111N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A25.2332.025615083.0N/A12.8170.8102.37148.078N/AN/A90.02048.0N/AN/AN/A231.81.6N/AN/AN/A76>2048‐‐‐128.0150N/A75.919.02386.529.8827190.022549.91.74.4N/A18.12.510.4551.80.4N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A0.00460.02700.01500.00840.0300 ‐ 0.06500.81.3225076.33.319.13.610.9N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.32.59.11.20.0491N/AN/A1.2N/A
min max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmax depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 2.0 2.8 1.7 2.4 1.4 1.9 1.8 2.4 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1max depth ratiodmax/dbkf1.3 1.8 1.3 1.8 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.9bank height ratio BHR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0floodprone area widthwfpafeet 42.9 97.5 38.5 87.5 35.2 80.0 46.2 105.0 12.0 19.0 12.0 18.0entrenchment ratio ER 2.2 4.6 6.3 7.8 2.8 3.3 2.7 2.9valley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ foot0.0076 0.0114riffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot 0.0100 0.0148 0.0162 0.0203 0.0172 0.0318 0.0103 0.0171 0.0314 0.0801 0.0080 0.0526riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schannel1.5 2.2 1.3 1.7 0.7 1.3 1.4 2.1 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.2pool slopeSpoolfeet/ foot 0.0000 0.0014 0.0000 0.0023 0.0000 0.0059 0.0000 0.0034 0.0000 0.0127 0.0000 0.0170pool slope ratioSpool/Schannel0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.40pool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeet 96.0 111.0 80.0 101.0 74.6 76.7 55.8 149.0 20.0 54.0 20.0 27.0pool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkf4.9 5.7 4.6 5.8 4.7 4.8 2.7 7.1 2.3 6.4 2.4 3.3maximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeet 4.0 5.6 3.5 4.8 3.2 3.2 3.9 6.5 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.7pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf2.6 3.6 2.7 3.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 4.3 2.1 3.0 2.8 2.8pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet 29.0 29.0 25.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 29.0 29.0 10.5 10.5 10.0 10.0pool width ratiowpool/wbkf1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2sinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet 68.8 89.4 53.4 81.3 45.0 69.2 39.0 108.4 12.0 16.0 11.0 18.0meander width ratiowblt/wbkf3.5 4.6 3.1 4.6 2.8 4.3 1.9 5.2 1.4 1.9 1.3 2.1linear wavelength LW feet 140.3 181.4 146.4 172.1 110.8 161.5 125.0 229.042.0 78.0 42.0 50.0linear wavelength ratioLW/wbkf7.2 9.3 8.4 9.8 6.9 10.1 6.0 10.9 4.9 9.2 5.1 6.0meander lengthLmfeet 192.2 207.2 179.2 199.8 149.3 171.4 177.0 312.4 41.0 77.0 41.0 48.0meander length ratioLm/wbkf9.9 10.6 10.2 11.4 9.3 10.7 8.4 14.9 4.8 9.1 4.9 5.8radius of curvatureRcfeet 35.0 50.0 32.0 50.0 30.0 50.5 36.0 85.6 12.0 25.0 10.0 25.0radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf1.8 2.6 1.8 2.9 1.9 3.2 1.7 4.1 1.4 2.9 1.2 3.00.0242 0.0316 0.04250.033519.05.33.03.78.80.60.0504.18.30.614.50.045819.04.83.04.18.50.616.01.2UT1BDesigned ConditionsUT1CDesigned ConditionsB40.1621.01.514.2B4a0.160.0503.88.50.613.813.30.0295Bull Creek Reach 3Designed ConditionsC32.02116.031.13.05.816.61.20.0505.20.01183.09.021.71.40.0503.9>2.2Bull Creek Reach 1BBull Creek Reach 2C3b1.7999.019.33.06.118.1C31.6890.0Designed ConditionsDesigned Conditions23.2Pattern Features20.31.50.0503.219.51.617.51.313.20.01501.30.0503.90.00690.0123>2.21.1Bull Creek Reach 1ADesign Morphology Paramaters1.31.21.21.31.11.6390.030.23.05.1Cross-Section FeaturesNotationUnitsDesigned ConditionsC312.60.0086SlopeRiffle FeaturesPool Features
min max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage areaDA sq mibankfull design dischargeQbkfcfsbankfull cross-sectional areaAbkfSFside slopes H:V ft/ftchannel bottom widthbbkffeetbankfull wetted perimeterWPbkffeetbankfull hydraulic radiusrbkffeetmannings 'n'average velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmax depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0max depth ratiodmax/dbkf1.2 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.6bank height ratio BHR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0floodprone area widthwfpafeet 5.0 8.0 8.0 13.0 13.0 30.0 15.0 34.0 10.0 15.0 16.5 37.5entrenchment ratioER1.4 2.2 2.8 5.7 5.0 7.5 5.1 6.6 3.1 6.0valley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/ foot0.0229 0.03870.0304 0.0363 0.0121 0.0146riffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot 0.0457 0.0681 0.0287 0.0414 0.0135 0.0409 0.0135 0.0449 0.0385 0.0488 0.0198 0.0266riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schannel0.7 1.0 1.0 1.8 0.7 2.0 1.0 3.3 1.1 1.5 1.6 2.0pool slopeSpoolfeet/ foot 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0092 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0145 0.0000 0.0081pool slope ratioSpool/Schannel0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40pool-to-pool spacingLp-pfeet 21.0 21.0 22.0 33.0 23.0 44.0 30.0 47.0 24.0 29.0 31.0 58.0pool spacing ratioLp-p/wbkf5.7 5.7 3.6 5.5 3.9 7.4 4.4 7.0 3.4 4.1 4.1 7.7maximum pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeet 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.9pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf8.0 8.0 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2pool width at bankfullwpoolfeet 4.3 4.3 7.5 7.5 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 11.0 11.0pool width ratiowpool/wbkf1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.5sinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet N/A N/A 10.0 18.0 19.0 26.0 23.0 34.0 11.0 19.0 17.2 44.8meander width ratiowblt/wbkfN/A N/A 1.7 3.0 3.2 4.3 3.3 4.9 1.6 2.7 2.2 6.0linear wavelength LW feet N/A N/A 47.0 56.0 50.0 65.0 60.0 70.0 44.0 52.0 63.8 91.0linear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfN/A N/A 7.8 9.3 8.3 10.8 8.9 10.2 6.3 7.4 8.5 12.1meander lengthLmfeet N/A N/A 48.0 65.0 56.0 76.0 73.0 90.0 48.0 54.0 65.2 118.0meander length ratioLm/wbkfN/A N/A 8.0 10.8 9.3 12.7 10.8 13.2 6.8 7.7 8.7 15.7radius of curvatureRcfeet N/A N/A 13.0 18.0 12.0 15.0 13.0 17.0 10.0 25.0 12.0 22.0radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfN/A N/A 2.2 3.0 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.5 1.4 3.6 1.6 2.9UT2B40.013.00.93.0Notation UnitsCross-Section FeaturesDesigned ConditionsUT3CDesigned Conditions0.22.76.00.5C4b0.057.02.62.04.012.03.63.03.5UT3BDesigned ConditionsUT2BDesigned Conditions4.06.20.6B4UT2CDesign Morphology ParamatersB40.047.02.72.014.20.0731UT2ADesigned Conditions1.73.60.20.050 0.05013.30.02346.20.40.0502.46.00.5C40.0712.04.70.53.37.00.612.00.0502.47.50.0500.073.02.87.20.52.72.67.80.613.72.02.37.10.50.050Designed ConditionsC40.057.03.2*Reach too short for pattern features to be calculated.0.0681 0.0200 0.01352.26.80.512.90.0179 0.0153>2.2N/A*1.11.21.11.21.3Pool FeaturesPattern FeaturesSlopeRiffle Features13.30.02720.0329
Appendix 5 – Categorical Exclusion and Resource Agency
Correspondence
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
•Project•
•
Project Name: Key Mill Mitigation Site
County Dame: Surry County
EEP Number: 100025
Project Sponsor: Wld3ands Engineering, Inc
Project Contact Name: Andrea S. Eckardt
Project Contact Address: 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 23203
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Protect Manager: Matthew Raid
ProjectDescription
The Key Mil! Mitigation Site is a stream mitigation project located approximately 7 miles south of the Town of Mt. Airy
and 8 miles northeast of the Town of Pilot Mountain in Surry County, NC.
The project includes Bull Creek and four
unnamed tributaries to Bull Creek for a total of 8,155 linear feet of stream.
Historically the site has been used for
cattle and other agricultural uses. The site is currently used for grazing cattle. The project will provide stream
mitigation units to the division of Mitigation Services in the Yadkin River Basin (03044101).
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
r%
l✓
Date
EEP roject Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
1 LZ�
Date
or Division Administrator
FHWA

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? Yes
No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Program?
Yes
No
N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
designated as commercial or industrial?
Yes
No
N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? Yes
No
N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
Historic Places in the project area?
Yes
No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? Yes
No
N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? Yes
No
N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? Yes
No
N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as “territory” by the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians?
Yes
No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? Yes
No
N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
Places?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? Yes
No
N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? Yes
No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
of antiquity?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? Yes
No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
listed for the county?
Yes
No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? Yes
No
N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Is the project “likely to adversely affect” the species and/or “likely to adversely modify”
Designated Critical Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? Yes
No
N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a “jeopardy” determination? Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as “territory”
by the EBCI?
Yes
No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
project?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
sites?
Yes
No
N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? Yes
No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
important farmland?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? Yes
No
N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
water body?
Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? Yes
No
N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
outdoor recreation?
Yes
No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? Yes
No
N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? Yes
No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? Yes
No
N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
project on EFH?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? Yes
No
N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? Yes
No
N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? Yes
No
N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? Yes
No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
federal agency?
Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Key Mill Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
SUMMARY

Key Mill Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS #100025 1
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides a
Federal “Superfund” to clean up uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents,
spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.
As the Key Mill Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project; an EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was
ordered for the site through Environmental Data Resources, Inc on July 21, 2017. Neither the target
property nor the adjacent properties were listed in any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental
databases searched by the EDR. The assessment revealed no evidence of any “recognized environmental
conditions” in connection with the target property. The Executive Summary of the EDR report is
included in the Appendix. The full report is available if needed. 
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American
architecture, history, archaeology, and culture, and Section 106 mandates that federal agencies take
into account the effect of an undertaking on a property that is included in, or is eligible for inclusion in,
the National Register of Historic Places.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) requested review and comment from the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) with respect to any archeological and architectural resources related to the
Key Mill Mitigation Site on July 24, 2017. SHPO responded on August 10, 2017 and stated they were
aware of “no historic resources which would be affected by the project” and would have no further
comment. All correspondence related to Section 106 is included in the Appendix.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
These acts, collectively known as the Uniform Act, provide for uniform and equitable treatment of
persons displaced from their homes, businesses, non-profit associations, or farms by federal and
federally-assisted programs, and establish uniform and equitable land acquisition policies.
Key Mill Mitigation Site is a full-delivery project that includes land acquisition. Notification of the fair
market value of the project property and the lack of condemnation authority by Wildlands was included
in the signed Option Agreement for the project property. A copy of the relevant section of the Option
Agreement is included in the Appendix.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies, in consultation with and with the assistance of the
Secretary of the Interior or of Commerce, as appropriate, to ensure that actions they authorize, fund or
carry out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of threatened or endangered species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat for these species.
The Surry County listed endangered species includes the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (DLJŽƚŝƐ
ƐĞƉƚĞŶƚƌŝŽŶĂůŝƐ), the Small Whorled pogonia (/ƐŽƚƌŝĂŵĞĚĞŽůŽŝĚĞƐ), Schweinitz’s sunflower (,ĞůŝĂŶƚŚƵƐ
ƐĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnjŝŝ), and the Bog turtle ('ůLJƉƚĞŵLJƐŵƵŚůĞŶďĞƌŐŝŝ). The USFWS does not currently list any Critical
Habitat Designations for the Federally-listed species within Surry County nor are there any known
occurrences of the NLEB documented within the County
(https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html). The project site is over 70
miles from the nearest known hibernaculum for the NLEB.

Key Mill Mitigation Site Categorical Exclusion
DMS #100025 2
A pedestrian survey conducted on September 14, 2017, indicated that the Site provides suitable habitat
for Schweinitz’s sunflower, small whorled pogonia, and summer roosting habitat for the Northern long-
eared bat but no species were identified on the site. Therefore, due to the absence of the listed species
on the site, the project has been determined by Wildlands to have “no effect” on the Schweinitz’s
sunflower and small whorled pogonia and is “may effect” the Northern long-eared bat.
Wildlands requested review and comment from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on
July 24, 2017 in respect to the Key Mill Mitigation Site and its potential impacts on threatened or
endangered species. Included in this request was a completed NLEB 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation
Form. USFWS has not responded at this time. All documents sub mitted to the USFWS are included in
the Appendix.
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
The FPPA requires that, before taking or approving any federal action that would result in conversion of
farmland, the agency must examine the effects of the action using the criteria set forth in the FPPA, and,
if there are adverse effects, must consider alternatives to lessen them.
The Key Mill Mitigation Site includes the conversion of prime farmland. As such, Form AD-1006 has been
completed and submitted to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The completed form
and correspondence documenting its submittal is included in the Appendix.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
The FWCA requires consultation with the USFWS and the appropriate state wildlife agency on projects
that alter or modify a water body. Reports and recommendations prepared by these agencies document
project effects on wildlife and identify measures that may be adopted to prevent loss or damage to
wildlife resources.
The Key Mill Mitigation Site includes stream restoration. Wildlands requested comment on the project
from both the USFWS and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on July 24, 2017.
NCWRC responded on August 11, 2017 and stated that the project would “not impact wild trout
resources or other known significant aquatic resources”. USFWS has not responded at this time. All
correspondence with the two agencies is included in the Appendix.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
The MBTA makes it unlawful for anyone to kill, capture, collect, possess, buy, sell, trade, ship, import, or
export any migratory bird. The indirect killing of birds by destroying their nests and eggs is covered by
the MBTA, so construction in nesting areas during nesting seasons can constitute a taking.
Wildlands requested comment on the Key Mill Stream Mitigation Site from the USFWS in regards to
migratory birds on June 24, 2017. The USFWS has not responded at this time. All correspondence with
USFWS is included in the Appendix.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
Categorical Exclusion
APPENDIX
FORM-NULL-PVC
tropeRpaMsuidaRyrammuSRDE
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Key Mill
Key Road
Ararat, NC 27007
Inquiry Number: 5000150.6s
July 21, 2017
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC5000150.6s
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5000150.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
KEY ROAD
ARARAT, NC 27007
COORDINATES
36.3958850 - 36˚ 23’ 45.18’’Latitude (North):
80.6033900 - 80˚ 36’ 12.20’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
535566.9UTM X (Meters):
4027730.8UTM Y (Meters):
1104 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
TPTarget Property:
U.S. Geological SurveySource:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140524Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
5000150.6s Page 2
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
KEY ROAD
ARARAT, NC 27007
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5000150.6s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.ORPHAN SUMMARYCity EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC5000150.6s Page 9
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
TC5000150.6s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
TC5000150.6s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS
TC5000150.6s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5000150.6s Page 7
TC5000150.6s Page 8
NO SITES FOUND
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation

6RXWK0LQW6WUHHW6XLWH&KDUORWWH1&Ń3Ń)
July24,2017

ReneeGledhillǦEarley
StateHistoricPreservationOffice
4617MailServiceCenter
Raleigh,NC27699Ǧ4617


Subject:KeyMillMitigationSite
SurryCounty,NorthCarolina 

DearMs.GledhillǦEarley,

WildlandsEngineering,Inc.requestsreviewandcommentonanypossibleissuesthatmight
emergewithrespecttoarchaeologicalorculturalresourcesassociatedwiththeKeyMill
MitigationSite.AUSGSTopographicMapandanOverviewSiteMapwithapproximateproject
areasareenclosed.

TheKeyMillMitigationSiteisbeingdevelopedtoprovideinǦkindmitigationforunavoidable
streamchannelimpacts.Severalsectionsofchannelhavebeenidentifiedassignificantly
degraded.TheprojectwillincludestreamrestorationonBullCreekandseveralunnamed
tributariestoBullCreek.Thesitehashistoricallybeendisturbedduetoagriculturaluse,
includingbothcattleandrowcrops.

Weaskthatyoureviewthissitebasedontheattachedinformationtodeterminethepresence
ofanyhistoricproperties.

Wethankyouinadvanceforyourtimelyresponseandcooperation.Pleasefeelfreetocontact
uswithanyquestionsthatyoumayhaveconcerningtheproject.

Sincerely,

LucieLaw
EnvironmentalScientist

Attachment:
USGSTopographicMap
OverviewSiteMap

„c ST TE
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Rarnona \I. Bartos, Administrator
Govemor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
August 10, 2017
Lucie Law
Wildlands Engineering
430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
llaw@wildlandsen,e.com
Office of Archives and I Iistory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Key Mill Mitigation Site, on Bull Creek and several tributaries, Surry County (ER 17-1345)
Dear Ms. Law:
Thank you for your letter of July 24, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the
project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or renee. lei
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced
tracking number.
Sincerely,
r
I'lleamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Strcet, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

With a copy to:
Michael Key and Jason & Marsh Smith
[e-mail] [e-mail]
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this paragraph.
3.3 Assignment. Buyer has the right to assign this agreement without the consent of Seller. No assignment
shall be effective unless the assignee has delivered to Seller a written assumption of Buyer's obligations under this
agreement. Seller hereby releases Buyer from any obligations under this agreement arising after the effective date of
any assignment of this agreement by Buyer.
3.4 Value of Conservation Easement; No Power of Eminent Domain. In accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Buyer hereby notifies Seller that: (i) Buyer
believes that the fair market value of the Conservation Easement is an amount equal to the Purchase Price; and (ii)
Buyer does not have the power of eminent domain.
3.5 Modification; Waiver. No amendment of this agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and
signed by the parties. No waiver of satisfaction of a condition or failure to comply with an obligation under this
agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver, and no such waiver will
constitute a waiver of satisfaction of any other condition or failure to comply with any other obligation.
3.6 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other to interpret or enforce any of the
terms of this agreement or because of the breach by the other party of any of the terms of this agreement, the losing
party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, court costs, litigation costs and any other
expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or defense of such action, whether or not the action is prosecuted
to a final judgment.
3.7 Memorandum of Option Agreement. Concurrently with the signing of this agreement, Buyer and Seller
agree to sign a Memorandum of Option that will be recorded against the Property in the Register of Deeds in the County
stated in paragraph A within five days after the Effective Date.
3.8 Tax Deferred Exchange. If Seller desires to implement a tax-deferred exchange (the "Exchange") in
connection with Buyer's purchase of the Conservation Easement, the parties agree to cooperate in affecting the
Exchange. Seller is responsible for all additional costs associated with the Exchange and Buyer shall not have any
additional liability with respect to the Exchange. The parties will execute any additional documents required for the
Exchange at no cost to Buyer.
3.9 Brokers. Shawn D. Wilkerson and Robert W. Bugg are North Carolina Real Estate Brokers. Neither
Buyer nor Seller has incurred any liability for any brokerage fee, commission or finder's fee in connection with this
agreement or the transactions contemplated by this agreement.
3.14 Entire Agreement. Each party acknowledges they are not relying on any statements made by the other
party, other than in this agreement, regarding the subject matter of this agreement. Neither party will have a basis for
bringing any claim for fraud in connection with any such statements.
3.11 Mutual Agreement. This is a mutually negotiated agreement and regardless of which party was more
responsible for its preparation, this agreement shall be construed neutrally between the parties.
11-15-16 RWB
Buyer
Seller


1430SouthMintStreet,Suite104Charlotte,NC28203Ń(P)704Ǧ332Ǧ7754Ń(F)704Ǧ332Ǧ3306


July24,2017

MarellaBuncick
USFishandWildlifeService
AshevilleFieldOffice
160ZillicoaStreet
Asheville,NC28801

Subject:KeyMillMitigationSite
SurryCounty,NorthCarolina

DearMs.Buncick,

WildlandsEngineering,Inc.requestsreviewandcommentonanypossibleissuesthatmight
emergewithrespecttoendangeredspecies,migratorybirds,orothertrustresources
associatedwiththeproposedKeyMillMitigationSite.AUSGSTopographicMapandan
OverviewSiteMapshowingtheapproximateprojectareaareenclosed.Thetopographicfigure
waspreparedfromtheMountAirySouth,7.5ǦMinuteUSGSTopographicQuadrangles.

TheKeyMillMitigationSiteisbeingdevelopedtoprovideinǦkindmitigationforunavoidable
streamchannelimpacts.Severalsectionsofchannelhavebeenidentifiedassignificantly
degraded.TheprojectwillincludestreamrestorationonBullCreekandseveralunnamed
tributariestoBullCreek.Thesitehashistoricallybeendisturbedduetoagriculturaluse,
includingbothcattleandcrops.

Accordingtoyourwebsite(https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/surry.html)the
threatenedorendangeredspeciesforSurryCountyare:theSmallWhorledpogonia(Isotria
medeoloides),Schweinitz’ssunflower(Helianthusschweinitzii),Bogturtle(Glyptemys
muhlenbergii),andtheNorthernlongǦearedbat(Myotisseptentrionalis).Duetotherecent
listingofthebat,wehavealsoincludedacompletedNorthernLongǦEaredBat4(d)Rule
StreamlinedConsultationFormasadditionaldocumentation.

Ifwehavenotheardfromyouin30days,wewillassumethatyoudonothaveanycomments
regardingassociatedlawsandthatyoudonothaveanyinformationrelevanttothisprojectat
thecurrenttime.

Wethankyouinadvanceforyourtimelyresponseandcooperation.Pleasefeelfreetocontact
uswithanyquestionsthatyoumayhaveconcerningthisproject.

Sincerely,

LucieLaw
EnvironmentalScientist

Attachment:
USGSTopographicMapandOverviewSiteMap
Northern Long -Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form
Federal agencies should use this form for the optional streamlined consultation framework for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB). This framework allows federal agencies to rely upon the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) January 5, 2016, intra -Service Programmatic Biological Opinion (BO) on the final 4(d) rule for the
NLEB for section 7(a)(2) compliance by: (1) notifying the USFWS that an action agency will use the streamlined
framework; (2) describing the project with sufficient detail to support the required determination; and (3) enabling
the USFWS to track effects and determine if reinitiation of consultation is required per 50 CFR 402.16.
This form is not necessary if an agency determines that a proposed action will have no effect to the NLEB or if
the USFWS has concurred in writing with an agency's determination that a proposed action may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect the NLEB (i.e., the standard informal consultation process). Actions that may cause
prohibited incidental take require separate formal consultation. Providing this information does not address
section 7(a)(2) compliance for any other listed species.
Information to Determine 4(d) Rule Compliance:
l . Does the project occur wholly outside of the WNS Zone?
❑
0
2. Have you contacted the appropriate agency to determine if your project is near
®
❑
known hibernacula or maternity roost trees?
3. Could the project disturb hibernating NLEBs in a known hibernaculum?
❑
4. Could the project alter the entrance or interior environment of a known
❑
I]
hibernaculum?
5. Does the project remove any trees within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at
❑
any time of ear?
6. Would the project cut or destroy known occupied maternity roost trees, or any
❑
FX1
other trees within a 150 -foot radius from the maternity roost tree from .Tune 1
through July 31.
You are eligible to use this form if you have answered yes to question #1 or yes to question #2 and no to
questions 3, 4, 5 and 6. The remainder of the form will be used by the USFWS to track our assumptions in the
BO.
Agency and Applicant3 (Name, Email, Phone No.): FHWA, Donnie Brew, donnie.brew dot. ov,
919-747-7017; Andrea Eckardt, aeckardt wildlandsen .com, 704-332-7754 ext 101
Project Name: Key Mill Mitigation Site
Project Location (include coordinates if known): 36.3958850 (N), 80.6033900 (W)
Basic Project Description (provide narrative below or attach additional information):
The Key Mill Mitigation Site is a stream mitigation project located approximately 7 miles south of the Town of Mt. Airy and 8
miles northeast of the Town of Pilot Mountain in Surry County, NC. The project includes Bull Creek and four unnamed
tributaries to Bull Creek for a total of 8,155 linear feet of stream. Historically the site has been used for cattle and other
agricultural uses. The site is currently used for grazing cattle. The project will provide stream mitigation units to the Division of
Mitigation Services in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101). Construction of the stream restoration project will include some tree
removal (>3"DBH) — approximately 1.75 acres.
1 http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/Pdf/"SZone.pdf
a See http://www.fws.-ov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/nhisites.htmi
a If applicable - only needed for federal actions with applicants (e.g,, for a permit, etc.) who are party to the consultation.

General Project Information
Does the project occur within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum?
❑
Does the project occur within 150 feet of a known maternity roost tree?
❑
Does the project include forest conversion'? (if yes, report acreage below)
®
❑
Estimated total acres of forest conversion
1.75 ac
If known, estimated acres' of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31
1.00 ac
If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 316
Does the project include timber harvest? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of timber harvest
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31
Does the project include prescribed fire? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of prescribed fire
If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31
Does the project install new wind turbines? (if yes, report capacity in MW below)
❑
Estimated wind capacity (MW)
Agency Determination:
By signing this form, the action agency determines that this project may affect the NLEB, but that any
resulting incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the final 4(d) rule.
If the USFWS does not respond within 30 days from submittal of this form, the action agency may
presume that its determination is informed by the best available information and that its project
responsibilities under 7(a)(2) with respect to the NLEB are fulfilled through the USFWS January 5,
2016, Programmatic BO. The action agency will update this determination annually for multi-year
activities.
The action agency understands that the USFWS presumes that all activities are implemented as
described herein. The action agency will promptly report any departures from the described activities to
the appropriate USFWS Field Office. The action agency will provide the appropriate USFWS Field
Office with the results of any surveys conducted for the NLEB. Involved parties will promptly notify the
appropriate USFWS Field Office upon finding a dead, injured, or sick NLEB.
Signature: Date Submitted: C7
4 Any activity that temporarily or permanently removes suitable forested habitat, including, but not limited to, tree removal
from development, energy production and transmission, mining, agriculture, etc. (see page 48 of the BO).
s If the project removes less than 10 trees and the acreage is unknown, report the acreage as less than 0.1 acre.
6 If the activity includes tree clearing in June and July, also include those acreage in April to October.

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request
Name of Project Federal Agency Involved
Proposed Land Use County and State
PART II (To be completed by NRCS) Date Request Received By
NRCS
Person Completing Form:
Does the site contain Prime, Unique, Statewide or Local Important Farmland?
(If no, the FPPA does not apply - do not complete additional parts of this form)
YES NO
Acres Irrigated

Average Farm Size

Major Crop(s)

Farmable Land In Govt. Jurisdiction
Acres: %
Amount of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
Acres: %
Name of Land Evaluation System Used

Name of State or Local Site Assessment System

Date Land Evaluation Returned by NRCS

Alternative Site Rating PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site A Site B Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site
PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland
B. Total Acres Statewide Important or Local Important Farmland
C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted
D. Percentage Of Farmland in Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value
PART V (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion
Relative Value of Farmland To Be Converted (Scale of 0 to 100 Points)

PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site Assessment Criteria
(Criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5 b. For Corridor project use form NRCS-CPA-106)
Maximum
Points Site A Site B Site C Site D
1. Area In Non-urban Use (15)
2. Perimeter In Non-urban Use (10)
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed (20)
4. Protection Provided By State and Local Government (20)
5. Distance From Urban Built-up Area (15)
6. Distance To Urban Support Services (15)
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average (10)
8. Creation Of Non-farmable Farmland (10)
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services (5)
10. On-Farm Investments (20)
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services (10)
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use (10)
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or local site assessment) 160
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines) 260

Site Selected:

Date Of Selection
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
YES NO
Reason For Selection:

Name of Federal agency representative completing this form: Date:
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006 (03-02)
08/03/2017
Key Mill Mitigation Site NC Division of Mitigation Services
Stream Restoration Surry County, NC
08/03/2017 Milton Cortes,NRCS NC
none 101 acres
CORN 54% 187, 236 acres
155,337 acres44.8 %
Surry Co. NC LESA N/A August 11, 2017 by eMail
19.3
19.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
12.40
0
0.0080
12%
58
15
10
12
20
15
10
10
0
5
10
0
0
107 0 0 0
58000
107 0 0 0
165 0 0 0

$QGUHD(FNDUGW
)URP$QGUHD(FNDUGW
6HQW7KXUVGD\6HSWHPEHU30
7R
PLOWRQFRUWHV#QFXVGDJRY

6XEMHFW):5HTXHVWIRU$')RUP.H\0LOO0LWLJDWLRQ6LWH6XUU\&RXQW\1&
$WWDFKPHQWV.H\0LOO$'SGI
,PSRUWDQFH+LJK
Milton
Attached is the completed AD1006 form for the Key Mill Mitigation Site for your files.

Thanks for your help.

Andrea

Andrea S. Eckardt | ^ĞŶŝŽƌŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůWůĂŶŶĞƌ
704.332.7754 x101

From: Lucie Law
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:15 PM
To: Andrea Eckardt <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Request for AD1006 Form - Key Mill Mitigation Site- Surry County, NC
Importance: High

From: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:41 PM
To: Lucie Law <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Request for AD1006 Form - Key Mill Mitigation Site- Surry County, NC
Importance: High

Ms. Law;

Please find attached the Farmland Impact Rating evaluation for the Key Mill Mitigation Site- Surry County, NC

If we can be of further assistance please let us know.

Cordially;

`|ÄàÉÇ VÉÜàxá
Assistant State Soil Scientist
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
4407 Bland Rd, Suite 117
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]


From: Lucie Law [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 8:16 AM
To: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for AD1006 Form - Key Mill Mitigation Site- Surry County, NC

Hi Milton,

I have a request for a completed AD-1006 form for a NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) stream restoration
project (Key Mill Mitigation Site) located in Surry County. Please find a Vicinity map and Soils Map attached in addition
to the AD-1006 form with Parts I and III filled out. The soil breakdown is included on the soil map.

Thank you for your assistance and please let me know if you need any additional information.

Lucie Law | ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ĐŝĞŶƚŝƐƚ
O: 704.332.7754 x107
M: 276.492.8709

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203

This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and
subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender and delete the email immediately.

6RXWK0LQW6WUHHW6XLWH&KDUORWWH1&Ń3Ń)

July24,2017


ShannonDeaton
NorthCarolinaWildlifeResourceCommission
DivisionofInlandFisheries
1721MailServiceCenter
Raleigh,NC27699

Subject:KeyMillMitigationSite
SurryCounty,NorthCarolina

DearMs.Deaton,

WildlandsEngineering,Inc.requestsreviewandcommentonanypossibleissuesthat
mightemergewithrespecttofishandwildlifeissuesassociatedwiththeproposedKey
MillMitigationSite.AUSGSTopographicMapandanOverviewSiteMapshowingthe
approximateprojectareaareenclosed.Thetopographicfigurewaspreparedfromthe
MountAirySouth,7.5ǦMinuteUSGSTopographicQuadrangles.

TheKeyMillMitigationSiteisbeingdevelopedtoprovideinǦkindmitigationfor
unavoidablestreamchannelimpacts.Severalsectionsofchannelhavebeenidentified
assignificantlydegraded.TheprojectwillincludestreamrestorationonBullCreekand
severalunnamedtributariestoBullCreek.Thesitehashistoricallybeendisturbeddue
toagriculturaluse,includingbothcattleandrowcrops.

Wethankyouinadvanceforyourtimelyresponseandcooperation.Pleasefeelfreeto
contactuswithanyquestionsthatyoumayhaveconcerningthisproject.


Sincerely,


LucieLaw
EnvironmentalScientist

Attachment:
USGSTopographicMap
OverviewSiteMap
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
August 11, 2017
Lucy Law
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
SUBJECT: Key Mill Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Law:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your
July 24, 2017 letter regarding plans for a stream restoration project on Bull Creek and unnamed
tributaries in Surry County. You requested review and comment on the project. Our comments
on this project are offered for your consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of
1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The project will involve the restoration of approximately 8,155 feet of degraded streams.
This project should not impact wild trout resources or other known significant aquatic resources.
We recommend that riparian buffers that are to be reestablished be as wide as possible, given site
constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC generally recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on
perennial streams to maximize the benefits of buffers, including bank stability, stream shading,
treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

MEETING NOTES

MEETING: Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Yadkin 03040101; Surry County, NC
DEQ Contract No. 7180
DMS Project No. 100025
Wildlands Project No. 005-02165

DATE: Monday, August 14, 2017

LOCATION: 515 Key Road
Ararat, NC

Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Andrea Leslie, USFWS
Mac Haupt, DWR
Paul Wiesner, DMS
Matthew Reid, DMS
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands
Christine Blackwelder, Wildlands

Materials
 Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal dated 2/15/2017 in response to DMS RFP 16-006993

Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 1 pm. Shawn presented an overview of the project at the parking location. From there,
the group proceeded to walk the entire site in the following order: Bull Creek Reach 2, Bull Creek Reach 3,
wetland BMP, UT2, UT3, Bull Creek Reach 1, UT1. The meeting concluded at 4:30 PM. For organizational
purposes, the meeting notes are arranged by stream reach, from upstream to downstream.
1. Bull Creek
 Reach 1
o Bull Creek Reach 1 will be primarily constructed offline, into the right floodplain on the upstream
half of the reach and into the left floodplain on the downstream half of the reach.
o IRT members expressed concern over legacy sediments that may exist behind the old mill dams.
They pointed to crack between soil layers in a cut bank and noted that the backwater from the old
dams may have extended far upstream. Wildlands will shoot survey grades on top of the old dams
and compare to soil layers during existing conditions analysis. Shawn also noted that the legacy
sediments seemed consolidated and have been in place for 80 years since the last mill dam
breach.

KEY MILL Mitigation Site – Meeting Notes

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
 Reach 2/Wetland BMP
o Bull Creek Reach 2 will be restored and moved into the left floodplain, off the right valley wall.
Group agreed with this approach. The group noted that Bull Creek Reach 2 (downstream of Key
Road) has bank height ratios around 2 and is eroded.
o Wetland BMP – This wetland is designed to treat agricultural drainage from a defined valley that
does not have a flowing stream. Some discussion over whether a stream once ran here and had
been buried. Todd asked if there is a pipe which outlets into Bull Creek – there is not. No direct
credit has been requested for BMP.
 Reach 3
o Within the woods, Bull Creek Reach 3 has eroded, high banks, and privet dominates the
understory. Approximately halfway down the reach, the bank heights drop, invasive species are
small and sporadic, and the banks are more stable.
 IRT team members do not consider the first half of this reach to be preservation quality.
 Paul/Shawn remarked that, due to the restrictions set forth in the RFP, only 81 SMUs are
requested for the 1,460 LF stretch, which equates to an 18:1 ratio.
 Todd, Andrea, Mac agreed that they like the lower half of the project for preservation.
Discussion about potentially proposing the lower half at a 10:1 credit, and conserving the
upper half of Bull Creek Reach 3 at no credit.
 Discussion about potentially extending restoration into the woods for a distance. Wildlands is
agreeable to extending the P1 restoration a few hundred feet and tying into the preservation
section.
 Several solutions are possible here. If the IRT is agreeable we will select final approach after
survey and preliminary design.
2. UT1 -The group agreed with the approximate break between restoration and enhancement II on UT1.
3. UT2/UT2A - UT2 and UT2A approaches were reviewed and approved by the group. Discussion about UT2
where it hits the flat floodplain of Bull Creek and whether the creek would have naturally splayed into a
wetland. This area is heavily trampled by cattle and is growing over with aquatic vegetation, but has fast
flow. Wildlands will review the stream type during design.
4. UT3 - The group agreed on the approximate break between restoration and enhancement II on UT3.
Although incised, the stream in the enhancement II section is not eroding, and with the upstream pond
controlling peak watershed flows, the stream is unlikely to see flashy, eroding flows. Where restoration is
proposed, the banks are actively eroding and migrating, and restoration is appropriate.
5. Ratios - The group agreed upon the credit ratios presented in the Proposal and below
 Restoration, 1:1
 Enhancement II, 2.5:1
 Preservation, 10:1
6. Stream Crossings - All crossings are internal, which allows legal recourse if crossing restrictions are not
observed.
KEY MILL Mitigation Site – Meeting Notes

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 3
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
 Bull Creek/Key Road Crossing (#1 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked for Wildlands to explain this
crossing in detail. The farmer currently rotates cattle between fields upstream and downstream of
Key Road. Cattle are moved through the Key Road culvert. This is the only way the farmer can move
cattle between fields, so Wildlands has proposed an internal crossing upstream and downstream of
the road, which allows the farmer to move the cattle through the stream. Andrea expressed concern
about cattle entering the easement during crossing events. Temporary fence will be strung during
crossing events to prevent cattle from entering the remainder of the easement.
 UT1 – upstream crossing (#3 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked if this crossing could move upstream
of the conservation easement. No - the farmer cannot gain access to his upper fields by crossing the
stream above the project because the right valley wall is too steep to traverse.
 UT1 - downstream crossing (#4 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked if this crossing could be eliminated.
No – the farmer needs this crossing to gain access to his lower fields.
7. General suggestions/recommendations of the IRT
 Overall, members of the IRT would like to see the proposed approach (restoration, enhancement,
preservation) presented in the Mitigation Plan in the context of evolutionary stage.

These meeting minutes were prepared by Christine Blackwelder and reviewed by Shawn Wilkerson on August 15, 2017, and
represent the authors’ interpretation of events. Please report and discrepancies or corrections within 5 business days of
receipt of these minutes.
Appendix 6 – Invasive Species Plan
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 6
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 1 October 2018

Appendix 6 Invasive Species Plan
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. If, during the
monitoring period, invasive species threaten the survivability of planted woody vegetation in an area
that exceeds 1% of the planted easement acreage, the invasive species shall be treated. Smaller areas
may be treated at the discretion of the project engineer and biologist, if deemed in the best interest of
the Site. Generally, the treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 1 for common invasive
species found in riparian areas; however, the treatment may be changed based on the professional
judgement of the project engineer and biologist. For invasive species not listed in the below table that
threaten the survivability of the planted woody vegetation, Wildlands shall notify DMS of the invasive
species observed and the plan for treatment prior to treating the species. All invasive species treatment
will be reported in the following year’s monitoring plan.
Table 1. Invasive Species Treatment – Key Mill Mitigation Site
Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Honeysuckle
(Lonicera
japonica)
Small infestations of L. japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re-sprouts.
Care should be taken to bag and remove the plants, including mature fruits to prevent re-
establishment. Large infestations of L. japonica will usually require a combination of cut
stump and foliar herbicide treatments. Where vines have grown into the tree canopy, cut
each stem as close to the ground as possible. Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted stem
with a 25 percent solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Remove the twining vines to prevent
them from girdling and killing desirable vegetation. Groundcovers of L. japonica can be
treated with a foliar solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic
surfactant to thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Kudzu
(Pueraria
montana)
Small patches of P. montana that are not well-established can usually be eliminated by
persistent weeding, mowing, or grazing during the growing season. The spread of a well-
established infestation of P. montana can be controlled the same way, but cutting will
typically not kill the roots of larger plants. For vines in tree canopies, cut the vines near the
ground and apply a 50 percent solution of triclopyr to the stumps. This procedure remains
effective at lower temperatures as long as the ground is not frozen. Large infestations can
be effectively controlled with a foliar solution of 2 to 3 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus
a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves. The ambient air temperature
should be above 65 degrees Fahrenheit. After the above ground vegetation is controlled and
it is possible to dig and cut into the central root crown, apply a 50 percent solution of
glyphosate or triclopyr to the wound. The most successful chemical control of P. montana
can be achieved with a foliar solution of 0.75 percent clopyralid plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic
surfactant. Monitor all treatments in subsequent years for re-sprouting.
Porcelain berry
(Ampelopsis
glandulosa var.
brevipedunculata)
The most effective chemical control of A. brevipedunculata has been achieved using triclopyr
formulations toward the end of the growing season when plants are transporting nutrients
to their roots. Apply a 2 percent solution of triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant
to the foliage. Or cut the plants first, allow time for re-growth, and then apply the herbicide
mixture. A. brevipedunculata can also be killed with a mixture of 25 percent triclopyr and 75
percent mineral oil applied to the basal parts of the stem to a height of 2 to 3 feet from the
ground. This method should be used judiciously since it takes a lot of chemical and can result
in overspray. It has been used successfully in situations where no other technique is feasible,
such as cliff faces or other exposed sites.
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 6
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 2 October 2018

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Japanese Hops
(Humulus
japonicus)
Pre-emergent herbicide containing sulfometuron methyl (Oust XP) applied in early spring
causes minimal damage to established perennial vegetation. Mechanical control by cutting
or mowing as close to the ground as possible beginning in late spring and recurring
frequently until fall dieback is recommended. Post emergent herbicide treatment two times
a year (mid and late summer) to prevent the fall seed set is recommended. Glyphosate
provides good post-emergent chemical control. Hop seeds in the soil last up to three years.
Repeat treatments for two to three years should be expected, or longer in areas subject to
flooding that may receive influx of seeds from upstream infestations. Cultural control
methods which favor fast-growing tall tree species to create dense shade in spring and
summer and canopy closure will discourage infestations, as Japanese hop prefers direct
sunlight and does not tolerate heavy shade. Establishing an early thick groundcover of hairy
vetch, wheat, barley or rye can reduce hop germination and seedling survival. (National Park
Service, Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plants Working Group, 2009)
Tree of Heaven
(Ailanthus
altissima)
Foliar Spray Method: This method should be considered for large thickets where risk to non-
target species is minimal. Air temperature should be above 65°F to ensure absorption of
herbicides.
Glyphosate: Apply a 2% solution of glyphosate and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that may kill
non-target partially-sprayed plants.
Cut Stump Method: This control method should be considered when treating individual trees
or where the presence of desirable species precludes foliar application. Stump treatments
can be used if the ground is not frozen.
Triclopyr: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 25% solution
of triclopyr and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 20% of the stump.

Johnson Grass
(Sorghum
halepense)
Recommended control procedures: Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following
herbicides in water with a surfactant (June to October with multiple applications applied to
regrowth).
• Recommendation for mature grass control: apply Outrider* as a broadcast spray at 0.75 to
2 ounces per acre (0.2 to 0.6 dry ounce per 3-gallon mix) plus a nonionic surfactant to actively
growing Johnsongrass. For handheld and high-volume sprayers, apply 1 ounce of Outrider
per 100 gallons of water plus a nonionic surfactant at 0.25 percent. Outrider is a selective
herbicide that can be applied over the top of certain other grasses to kill Johnsongrass, or
apply Plateau as a 0.25-percent solution (1 ounce per 3-gallon mix) when plants are 18 to 24
inches (45 to 60 cm) tall or larger.
• Recommendation for seedling control: apply Journey as a 0.3-percent solution (1.2 ounces
per 3-gallon mix) before Johnsongrass sprouts and when desirable species are dormant or
apply a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix) directed at
the infestation.
Multiflora Rose
(Rosa multiflora.)
Foliar Spray Method: Apply MSM at 1 ounce per acre between April and June. May to
October apply a 4% solution of glyphosate and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that may kill
non-target partially-sprayed plants.
Cut Stump Method: This control method should be considered when treating individual
stems or where the presence of desirable species precludes foliar application. Stump
treatments can be used if the ground is not frozen.
Glyphosate: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 20% solution
of glyphosate and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 50% of the stump.
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 6
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 3 October 2018

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Mimosa
(Albizia julibrissin)
Trees: Make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, Garlon 3A or Milestone in dilutions as specified on the herbicide label (anytime
except March and April). For felled trees, apply the herbicides to stump tops immediately
after cutting. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants).
Saplings: Apply a basal spray to young bark using Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints
per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant,
or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply
Stalker* as a 6- to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil
product, vegetable oil, kerosene, or diesel fuel (where permitted). Resprouts and seedlings:
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant:
From June to August, either Escort XP at 1 ounce per acre (0.2 ounces per 3-gallon mix) plus
a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution addition (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or
Milestone VM Plus at 6 to 9 pints per acre (1.5 to 3 pints per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per
acre). From July to September, Transline* † or Milestone as a 0.25-percent solution plus
Garlon 3A as a 4-percent solution (1 ounce plus 5 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Princess Tree
(Paulownia
tomentosa)
Foliar Spray Method: This method should be considered for large thickets of paulownia
seedlings where risk to non-target species is minimal. Air temperature should be above
65°F to ensure absorption of herbicides.
Glyphosate: Apply a 2% solution of glyphosate and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that may kill
non-target partially-sprayed plants.
Triclopyr: Apply a 2% solution of triclopyr and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic sur-factant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray drift
damage to non-target species. Triclopyr is a selective herbicide for broadleaf species. In areas
where desirable grasses are growing under or around paulownia, triclopyr can be used
without non-target damage.
Cut Stump Method: This control method should be considered when treating individual trees
or where the presence of desirable species precludes foliar application. Stump treatments
can be used if the ground is not frozen.
Glyphosate: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 25% solution
of glyphosate and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 50% of the stump.
Triclopyr: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 50% solution
of triclopyr and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 20% of the stump.
https://www.se-eppc.org/manual/princess.html

Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 6
DMS ID No. 100025 Page 4 October 2018

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum
sinense)
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a
glyphosate herbicide as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) in the late fall or
early winter when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, or elsewhere, Arsenal AC* as
a 1-percent solution (4 ounces per 3-gallon mix). Backpack mist blowers can broadcast
glyphosate as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Escort XP* at 1 ounce per
acre (0.2 dry ounces per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre) during winter for safety to
dormant hardwoods. Summer applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as other
times and require a higher percent solution. The best time for Arsenal AC* and Escort XP* is
summer to fall. For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding vegetation
is desired, apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix)
in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel
fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply Stalker* as a 6- to 9-
percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil
or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted) to young bark as
a basal spray making certain to treat all stems in a clump; or cut and immediately treat the
stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5-percent solution (20 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Velpar
L* as a 10-percent solution in water (1 quart per 3-gallon mix) with a surfactant. When safety
to surrounding vegetation is desired, immediately treat stump tops and sides with Garlon 3A
or with a glyphosate herbicide as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix) in water
with a surfactant. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants). For
large stems, make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding
vegetation is desired, Garlon 3A or a glyphosate herbicide using dilutions and cut-spacings
specified on the herbicide label (anytime except March and April). An EZ-Ject tree injector
can help to reach the lower part of the main stem; otherwise, every branching trunk must
be hack-and-squirt injected.

Appendix 7 – Site Protection Instrument
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100025 October 2018

Appendix 7 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the parcel listed in the table below. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) executed an
option to purchase a conservation easement on a portion of Linda Faye Key’s property as identified
below. Upon issuance of the nationwide permit for this project and prior to construction, Wildlands will
record a conservation easement to encompass the restored, enhanced and preserved streams and their
corresponding riparian buffers associated with this project. A temporary construction easement is also
recorded on an upstream adjacent parcel to facilitate construction.
Table 1: Site Protection Instrument – Key Mill Mitigation Site
Current Landowner PIN County
Under Option
to Purchase
by Wildlands?
Memorandum of
Option/Temporary
Access and
Conservation
Easement Deed Book
(DB) and Page Number
(PG)
Acreage to be
Protected
Linda Faye Key 592600777192 Surry Yes DB: 302 PG: 610 20.81
Zachary Neil Hardy* 592600666552 Surry No DB: 1169 PG: 387 N/A
*Agreement for temporary construction easement

The conservation easement template has been enclosed in this appendix. The site protection instrument
requires 60-day advance notification to the USACE and or DMS before any action to void, amend, or
modify the document. No such action shall take place unless approved by the State.

NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 1 of 11

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
_______________ COUNTY
SPO File Number:
DMS Project Number:
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
this ________day of ________________, 20__, by Landowner name goes here
, (“Grantor”), whose mailing address is Landowner address goes here , to the State of
North Carolina, (“Grantee”), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of
Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The
designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State
of North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 2 of 11

protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife
habitat, and recreational opportunities; and

WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between ( insert name and
address of full delivery contract provider ) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, to provide stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and Services Contract
Number __________.

WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and

WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding, (MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU
recognized that the Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory
mitigation for authorized impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring,
enhancing and preserving the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and

WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and

WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service entered into an agreement to continue the In-Lieu Fee operations of the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem
Enhancement Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces
the previously effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and

WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and

WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and
Council of State to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this
instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 3 of 11

WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in __________ Township, ___________ County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately ________
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book _____ at Page ____
of the _________ County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the
areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions and
purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access Rights.
The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of if known,
insert name of stream, branch, river or waterway here.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Tracts Number ________________ containing a total of _________ acres as shown on the plats
of survey entitled “Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services, Project Name: ___________, SPO File No.__________, EEP Site No. ___________,
Property of _________________________,” dated ___________, 20__ by name of surveyor,
PLS Number __________ and recorded in the ______________ County, North Carolina Register
of Deeds at Plat Book _______ Pages __________.
See attached “Exhibit A”, Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
“Conservation Easement Area”
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries,
aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the
Conservation Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to
prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these
purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I.DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor’s heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 4 of 11

II.GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area
by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee.
Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units,
derived from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong
to the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A.Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation
Easement Area for the purposes thereof.
B.Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Area(s) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey
plat.
C.Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this
Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such
purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations.
Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D.Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded
survey plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or
vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E.Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses.All industrial, residential and
commercial uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
F.Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G.New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
H.Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 5 of 11

All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement Area shall be shown on
the recorded survey plat.

I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except
interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the
Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the
use of the Conservation Easement Area.

J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement
Area is prohibited.

K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel,
rock, peat, minerals, or other materials.

L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering
or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or
shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may
temporarily be withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the
Property.

M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple (“fee”) that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee’s right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.

N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.

O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.

The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652.

NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 6 of 11

III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A.Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Conservation Easement Area
over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, construct, manage,
maintain, enhance, protect, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other riparian resources in
the Conservation Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term
management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the
rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights.
B.Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in-stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C.Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D.Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the
investment and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which
would cause financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are
required to restrict livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so
may result in the State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences)
within the conservation area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the
landowner (Grantor) must provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E.Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A.Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or
features in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized
activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the
Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the
Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by
such breach. If the breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may
enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an
action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 7 of 11

power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Conservation Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation
Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages
from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the
immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other
appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the
benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights
and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all
other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B.Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at
reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying
with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C.Acts Beyond Grantor’s Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the
Grantor’s control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from
any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent,
abate, or mitigate significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D.Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor’s acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E.No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V.MISCELLANEOUS
A.This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not b e
affected thereby.
B.Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 8 of 11

obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of the Reserved Rights.

C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.

D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made.
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.

E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.

F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the
Property shall notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing
sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any
request to void or modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification
requests shall be addressed to:

Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321

and

General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.

NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 9 of 11

VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet
enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 10 of 11

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.

___________________________________ (SEAL)

NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF _________________

I, _____________________________, a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that _________________________, Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the __________
day of ___________________, 20__.

________________________________________
Notary Public

My commission expires:

______________________________

NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template adopted 29 April 2015
Page 11 of 11

Exhibit A

[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]

Appendix 8 – Maintenance Plan
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 8
DMS ID No. 100025 October 2018

Appendix 8 Maintenance Plan
Wildlands will visit the site semi-annually and conduct a physical inspection at least once per year during
the post-construction monitoring period and until performance standards are achieved. These site
inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. Routine
maintenance should be expected, most frequently in the first two years following site construction.
Routine maintenance may include the following:
Table 1. Maintenance Plan – Key Mill Mitigation Site
Component/
Feature Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations
of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel – these shall be conducted
where success criteria are threatened or at the discretion of the Designer. Areas where
storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to
prevent bank failures and head-cutting.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species requiring treatment per the
Invasive Species Treatment Plan (Appendix 6) shall be treated in accordance with that plan
and with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as-needed basis.
Beaver/Wildlife
Management
If beaver dams are observed on site, Wildlands will remove the dams and attempt to
remove the beavers from the site. If wildlife herbivory becomes a problem for the plantings,
Wildlands will take measures to manage wildlife on the site.

Appendix 9 – Financial Assurance
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Key Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 100025 October 2018
Appendix 9 Financial Assurances
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service’s In-Lieu Fee Instrument
dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has provided
the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to
satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS. This commitment provides financial assurance for all
mitigation projects implemented by the program.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
Title Sheet 0.1
General Notes and Legend 0.2
Project Overview 0.3
Typical Sections 1.1-1.11
Stream Plan and Profile 2.1-2.23
Grading Plan 3.1-3.8
Erosion and Sediment Control (Included in Final Plans) (4.1-4.x)
Planting and Fencing Plan 5.1-5.9
Details 6.1-6.16
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIG!
IT'S THE LAW!
CALL 1-800-632-4949N.C. ONE-CALL CENTER
Sheet Index
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
1430 S. Mint St., Ste. 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
704-332-7754
Surveying:
Kee Mapping & Surveying
Box P.O. 2566
Asheville, NC 28802
Phillip B. Kee, PLS
828-575-9021
N
Owner:
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Ste 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Matthew Reid
919-707-8976
DMS Project no. 100025
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-01504
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONPreliminary Plans
October 15, 2018
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Cover and Notes.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTitle Sheet005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE0.1October 15, 2018Surry County, NC
SITESiloam RoadKey RoadArarat R
o
a
d
Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaGeneral Notes and LegendSheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTION005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE0.2October 15, 2018T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Cover and Notes.dwgOctober 25, 2018Existing Thalweg
Existing Property Line
Existing Major Contour
Existing Minor Contour
Existing Overhead Electric
Existing Power Pole
Existing Temporary Construction Easement
Existing Fence
Existing Storm Pipe
Existing Farm Road
Existing Wetland
Existing Tree
Existing Bedrock
Existing Road
Existing Debris Pile
Existing Treeline
Existing Pond
Proposed Thalweg Alignment
Proposed Bankfull
Proposed Major Contour
Proposed Minor Contour
Proposed Safety Fence
Proposed Silt Fence
Proposed Limits of Disturbance
Proposed Conservation Easement
Proposed Temporary Conservation Easement
Proposed Internal Crossing at Conservation Easement
Proposed Culvert
Proposed Fencing
Proposed Tree Removal
Proposed Terracell 140
Cattle Crossing
Proposed Road over Culvert
Proposed Log Sill
See Detail 2, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Log J-Hook
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.2
Proposed Boulder J-Hook
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Log Vane
See Detail 1, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Rock Sill
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Cover Log
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.9
Proposed Rock Vane
See Detail 2, Sheet 6.4
Proposed Lunker Log
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.2
10+00
OHE
TCE TCE TCE
100100
PROJECT NOTES: (ADDITIONAL NOTES WILL BE INCLUDED WITH THE FINAL PLANS)
Topographic survey was completed by Kee Mapping and Surveying in March 2018.
Parcel boundary survey completed by Kee Mapping and Surveying in May 2018.
Topographic data outside proposed conservation easement supplemented with Lidar
data from 2017.
Riffle selection will be varied based on available materials at the Engineers'
discretion. Field coordination will be required.
The Site is approximately 1.5 miles from Black Water, NC. To get there from Black
Water, head east on Ararat Road (S.R. 2019) for roughly 1 mile. Turn Left on Key
Road. The site is bisected by Key Road. In approximately 0.5 miles, the west side of
the site will be on your left and the east side of the site will be on your right.XXExisting Features Proposed Features Erosion Control Features
Proposed Various Constructed Riffles Per Plans
See Sheet 6.1-6.2
Proposed Brush Toe
See Detail 3-4, Sheet 6.4
Proposed Sod Mat
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.5
Proposed Brush Mattress
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.9
Proposed Boulder Toe
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.8
Proposed Channel Plug
See Detail 4, Sheet 6.3
Proposed Structures
SAF SAF
[x][x]
Proposed BMP Inlet/Outlet Stabilization
See Details 2 and 3, Sheet 6.9
Proposed Haul Road
Proposed Temporary Rock Sediment Dam
See Detail 3, Sheet 6.8
Proposed Temporary Crossing
See Details 1-2, Sheet 6.7
Proposed Construction Entrance
See Detail 1, Sheet 6.8
Pump Around System
Tree Protection
LOD LOD
SAF
CE CE CE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: (TO BE INCLUDED IN FINAL PLANS)
(TO BE INCLUDED IN FINAL PLANS)
X X
TCE TCE TCE
CE-XS CE-XS CE-XS
0'150' 300' 450'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaProject Overview005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE0.3October 15, 2018N
Reach Reach Start End Station Type of Mitigation
Northing Easting Station
R1A 967255.23 1526843.10 100+95 105+39 Restoration
R1B 966953.15 1527027.89 105+39 112+61 Restoration
R2 966864.77 1527613.64 112+61 116+79 Restoration
R3 966807.00 1528127.22 150+30 167+56 Restoration
R4 966185.55 1529301.19 167+56 174+39 Preservation
UT1A 968069.36 1527267.64 200+21 208+85 Enhancement II
UT1B 967430.25 1527721.40 208+85 210+97 Restoration
UT1C 967245.93 1527800.36 211+36 213+93 Restoration
UT2 965906.42 1527791.97 350+00 350+42 Restoration
UT2A 965925.08 1527767.27 300+00 303+15 Restoration
UT2B 966181.96 1527894.24 303+50 306+13 Restoration
UT2C 966402.88 1528032.86 306+13 310+82 Restoration
UT3 967436.62 1528615.63 450+38 450+56 Enhancement II
UT3A 967430.52 1528625.75 400+57 404+70 Enhancement II
UT3B 967094.08 1528563.75 404+70 407+77 Restoration
UT3C 966848.62 1528451.56 408+12 412+24 Restoration
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXJASON ELLIOT SMITHAND MARCIA LYNNSMITH
PIN: 5926-77-7725
DB: 907 PG: 890
PB: 19 PG: 146,
TRACT 1
KEY ROADR/W WIDTH 60' PER DB: 298 PG: 489MARY L. HOLYFIELD HEIRS
PIN: 5926-00-75-4818
DB: 204 PG: 127
REF.: DB: 167 PG: 581
ZACHARY NEIL HARDYAND SARAH SMITHHARDYPIN: 5926-66-6552
DB: 1169 PG: 387
LINDA S. KEY
PIN: 5926-00-77-7192
DB: 302 PG: 610, DB: 385 PG: 465 &DB: 325 PG: 180
REFERENCES FOR DB: 302 PG: 610 & DB: 385
PG: 465
TRACT 1 - DB: 124 PAGE 426
TRACT 2 - DB: 149 PG: PG: 69TRACT 3 - DB: 117 PG: 278TRACT 4 - DB: 124 PG: 375, SECOND TRACT
KEY ROADR/W
WI
D
T
H
6
0'
P
E
R
D
B:
2
9
8
P
G:
4
8
9
LINDA S. KEY
PIN: 5926-00-77-7192
DB: 302 PG: 610, DB: 385 PG: 465 &DB: 325 PG: 180
REFERENCES FOR DB: 302 PG: 610 & DB: 385
PG: 465TRACT 1 - DB: 124 PAGE 426TRACT 2 - DB: 149 PG: PG: 69TRACT 3 - DB: 117 PG: 278
TRACT 4 - DB: 124 PG: 375, SECOND TRACT
DELANA SHINAULT
PIN: 5936-00-07-5126
DB: 1625 PG: 282
REF.: PORTION OF DB: 239 PG: 676
HOMEPLACE RECREATIONAL PARK, INC.
PIN: 5936-00-05-7889
DB: 1025 PG: 756 TRACTS 1 & 2
& DB: 1201 PG: 1206
PB: 19 PG: 29 & PB: 24 PG: 160CE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CE CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CE
CE
CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE CECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CECECE150+00
155+00
160+00
165+00
310+82
300+00
305+00
310+00
100+95
105+00
1
1
0
+
0
0
115
+
0
0
208+8
5
210+002
1
3
+
9
3
412+24
404+71
405+00410+00350+42
350+00SH
E
E
T

2
.
1
SHEET 2.2
SHEET 2.3
SHEET 2.4
S
H
E
E
T

2
.
5
SHEET 2.6
SHEET 2.7
SH
E
E
T

2
.
8
SH
E
E
T

2
.
9
SHEET 2.
1
0 SHEET 2.11
S
H
E
E
T

2
.
1
2
SH
E
E
T

2
.
1
3
S
H
E
E
T

2
.
1
4
SH
EET

2
.15SHEET 2
.16SHEET 2.20SHEET 2.17SHEET 2.18SHEET 2.19SHEET 2.21SHEET 2.22SHEET 2.23BULL CREEK
U
T
1
BULL CREEK
UT2UT320
0
+
0
0
2
0
5
+
0
0
400+00168+00
170+00 174+39
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsBull Creek Reach 1A005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.1October 15, 2018Bull Creek Reach 1A - Riffle
STA: 100+95 - 105+39
Bull Creek Reach 1A - Pool
STA: 100+95 - 105+39
19.50'
7.20'2.55'2.55'7.20'
2.65'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
2.40'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE 2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1 20:1
10' MIN 10' MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
29.00'
7.80'
1.70'
15.60'
3.90'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL4:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
2:13.90'-5.60'
2.20'1.70'
5.60'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
1.95'0.25'
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsBull Creek Reach 1B005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.2October 15, 2018Bull Creek Reach 1B - Riffle
STA: 105+39 - 112+61
Bull Creek Reach 1B - Pool
STA: 105+39 - 112+61
17.50'
5.70'3.05'3.05'5.70'
2.15'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
1.90'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
13.60'6.12'
1.40'
3.40'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
4:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.8:1
25.00'
2.5'1.40'
3.40'-4.80'
5.28'
1.24'1.24'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsBull Creek Reach 2005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.3October 15, 2018Bull Creek Reach 2 - Riffle
STA: 112+61 - 116+79
Bull Creek Reach 2 - Pool
STA: 112+61 - 116+79
16.00'
5.10'2.90'2.90'5.10'
1.95'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
1.70'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
23.00'
6.20'
1.10'
12.40'
3.10'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
4:1
2:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
2.20'1.10'
3.10'-4.20'
4.40'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
1.50'0.70'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsBull Creek Reach 3005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.4October 15, 2018Bull Creek Reach 3 - Riffle
STA: 150+30 - 167+56
Bull Creek Reach 3 - Pool
STA: 150+30 - 167+56
21.00'
6.00'4.50'4.50'6.00'
2.25'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1
3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
2.00'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
29.00'
7.60'
1.60'
15.20'
3.80'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
4:1
2:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
3.00'1.60'
3.80'-5.40'
6.20'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
10' MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
1.70'1.30'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT1B005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.5October 15, 2018UT1B - Riffle
STA: 208+85 - 210+97
UT1B - Pool
STA: 208+85 - 210+97
8.50'
2.40'1.85'1.85'2.40'
1.00'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.80'TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:120:1
5'MIN5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
10.50'
4.20'4.20'
1.40'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
3.30'
1.40'-1.80'
3:1
2:1
2.10'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
1.65'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT1C005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.6October 15, 2018UT1C - Riffle
STA: 211+36- 213+93
UT1C - Pool
STA: 211+36-213+93
8.30'
2.10'2.05'2.05'2.10'
0.90'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.70'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
10.00'
3.60'3.60'
1.20'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1
3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
1.20'-1.70'
3.20'
2:1
3:1
2.80'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
1.60'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT2005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.7October 15, 2018UT2 - Riffle
STA: 350+00 - 350+42
UT2 - Pool
STA: 350+00 - 350+42
3.50'
0.90'0.85'0.85'0.90'
0.40'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
PROPOSED THALWEG0.30'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
4.30'
1.80'1.80'
0.60'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1 2:1PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER
PROFILE
0.28'
0.6'-1.00'
3:1 3:1
0.70'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
0.14'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT2A+UT2B005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.8October 15, 2018UT2A - Riffle
STA: 300+00 - 303+15
UT2A - Pool
STA: 300+00 - 303+15
UT2B - Riffle
STA: 303+50 - 306+13
UT2B - Pool
STA: 303+50 - 306+13
6.00'
2.00'2.00'
0.60'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1 2:1
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.50'
1.00'1.00'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
8.00'
2.20'
0.40'
4.40'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
2:14:1 1.10'
1.10'-1.50'
0.40'0.60'
1.40'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
0.29'
7.50'
2.70'2.70'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
3:1
2:1
2.70'
0.90'0.9'-1.20'3:1
2:1
2.10'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
1.35'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT2C005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.9October 15, 2018UT2C - Riffle
STA: 306+13 - 310+82
UT2C - Pool
STA: 306+13 - 310+82
6.80'
1.20'2.20'2.20'1.20'
0.60'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2:1 2:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.70'TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
8.50'
2.20'
0.90'-1.40'
PROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULL
4:1 2:1PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1.30'
4.40'
0.30'0.30'
1.10'
1.90'
0.90'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT3B005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.10October 15, 2018UT3B - Riffle
Sta: 404+70 - 407+77
UT3B - Pool
Sta: 404+70 - 407+77
7.00'
2.10'2.10'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.70'0.80'3:13:1
1.40'1.40'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
8.50'
2.10'PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3.30'
3:13:1 1.10'
3.30'
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER PROFILE
1.10'-1.60'
1.90'
2:12:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
FLOODPLAIN GRADED TO
DRAIN TOWARDS CHANNEL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2:1 OR FLATTER
SLOPE
20:1
5'MIN
1.05'
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Typical Sections.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaTypical SectionsUT3C005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE1.11October 15, 2018UT3C - Riffle
Sta: 408+12 - 412+24
UT3C - Pool
Sta: 408+12 - 412+24
7.50'
2.52'2.52'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
0.90'1.00'2.8:12.8:1
1.23'1.23'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
11.00'
5.20'
PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.00'
2.60'
2:1
4:1
1.30'TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
DEPTH VARIES PER
PROFILE0.60'0.60'
1.30'-1.90'
3.20'
1.45'
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.1October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1097
1100
1105
1110
1097
1100
1105
1110
100+80 101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00
-1.4%
-1.5%
-1.3%
-1.0%
-0.2%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 100+95
ELEV = 1105.37
STA = 101+25
ELEV = 1104.95
STA = 101+26
ELEV = 1103.58 STA = 101+75ELEV = 1103.58STA = 102+00ELEV = 1104.65STA = 102+43ELEV = 1104.01STA = 102+44
ELEV = 1102.80 STA = 102+84ELEV = 1102.80STA = 103+04ELEV = 1103.93STA = 103+34ELEV = 1103.53STA = 103+34
ELEV = 1100.55
STA = 103+82
ELEV = 1100.55 STA = 104+06ELEV = 1103.23STA = 104+31ELEV = 1102.98STA = 104+32
ELEV = 1099.99 STA = 104+77ELEV = 1099.89FORD CROSSING
ELEV 1106.25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
1100
110011051105
1105
1105
1110
11101110
1115
1110
11101115CR-CHCR
-
N
R
CR-CH
CR
-
N
R CR-NR11051107
1114
1107100+95 101+0010
2
+
0
0
103+00
10
4
+
0
0
105+00106+00
BULL CREEK
EXISTING FENCE
STA.100+95START BULL CREEK REACH 1A
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
PROPOSED FORD CROSSING
TOP ELEV=1106.25
TIE IN PROPOSEDFORD CROSSING AT 10:1TO EXISTING THALWEG
STA.105+39END BULL CREEK REACH 1ASTART BULL CREEK REACH 1B
MATCH LINE - STA 105+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.2October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1095
1100
1105
1110
1095
1100
1105
1110
105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50
-1.5%
-1.0%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-1.9%
-1.5%
-1.0%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-1.9%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 105+01
ELEV = 1102.58
STA = 105+40
ELEV = 1102.00STA = 105+55ELEV = 1101.21STA = 105+71ELEV = 1101.21STA = 105+87ELEV = 1101.99STA = 106+36ELEV = 1101.49STA = 106+38
ELEV = 1099.98 STA = 106+74ELEV = 1099.98STA = 106+92ELEV = 1100.99STA = 107+37ELEV = 1100.10STA = 107+38
ELEV = 1098.75 STA = 107+72ELEV = 1098.75STA = 107+89ELEV = 1099.80STA = 108+18ELEV = 1099.21STA = 108+19
ELEV = 1097.76 STA = 108+52ELEV = 1097.76STA = 108+69ELEV = 1098.81STA = 109+12ELEV = 1098.00STA = 109+12
ELEV = 1095.25
XXX XXXXX
X
X
X X
X XXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE1095109511001100
110
0
1100
1100
1100110
5
1
1
0
5
1105
11051110
1110
STA 150+39END BULL CREEK REACH 1ASTART BULL CREEK REACH 1B
1105
CR-NR C
R
-
L
R
CR-LRCR-NR
CR-RRREMOVE EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING TREE LINE
11001105110211031
1
0
11104105+00
1
0
6
+
0
0
107+00108
+
0
0 109+0011
0
+
0
0
BULL CREEK
FILL EXISTING CHANNELMATCH LINE - STA 105+00MATCH LINE - STA 109+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.3October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1090
1095
1100
1105
1090
1095
1100
1105
109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+50 113+00 113+50
-2.0%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-3.1%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-3.1%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 109+54ELEV = 1095.25STA = 109+74ELEV = 1097.50STA = 110+16ELEV = 1096.69STA = 110+16
ELEV = 1094.02 STA = 110+49ELEV = 1094.02STA = 110+65ELEV = 1096.39STA = 111+19ELEV = 1095.29STA = 111+21
ELEV = 1092.77 STA = 111+48ELEV = 1092.77STA = 111+62ELEV = 1095.00STA = 111+97ELEV = 1094.30STA = 111+98
ELEV = 1093.03 STA = 112+40ELEV = 1093.03STA = 112+61
ELEV = 1094.10 STA = 113+02ELEV = 1092.80STA = 113+03
ELEV = 1091.46 STA = 113+31ELEV = 1091.46STA = 113+45ELEV = 1092.10XXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECE1090 1090
109010951095109
5
109
5
1095
1100
1100
1100
1
1
0
0
1100
11
0
5
1105
1110
STA 112+61
END REACH 1B
START REACH 2
CR-RR
C
R
-
L
R
CR-JZ CR-
N
R CR-CHCR-NR CR-LRREMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT1100 1
0
9
51095
109810971
0
9
3
109+00
1
1
0
+
0
0
111+00
112
+
0
0 113+00114+00BULL CREEK
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
1
1
0
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 109+50MATCH LINE - STA 113+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 2Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.4October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1082
1085
1090
1095
1082
1085
1090
1095
113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 116+80
-3.1%
-3.0%
-3.5%
-2.6%
-1.7%
-3.1%
-3.0%
-3.5%
-2.6%
-1.7%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 116+79ELEV = 1085.88STA = 116+79ELEV = 1085.88STA = 113+83
ELEV = 1090.90
STA = 113+84
ELEV = 1089.57 STA = 114+06ELEV = 1089.57STA = 114+17
ELEV = 1090.10 STA = 114+48ELEV = 1089.20STA = 114+48
ELEV = 1087.84 STA = 114+84ELEV = 1087.84STA = 115+02ELEV = 1088.30STA = 115+34ELEV = 1087.20STA = 115+34
ELEV = 1085.94 STA = 115+55ELEV = 1085.94STA = 115+66ELEV = 1086.50STA = 116+00ELEV = 1085.60STA = 116+01
ELEV = 1084.20 STA = 116+32ELEV = 1084.20STA = 116+48ELEV = 1084.90STA = 116+79ELEV = 1084.37CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE1085108
5
1090
1090109010901090 1090
109010901095
1095
10951095
1095
1
1
0
0
1100
213+93
2
1
3
+
0
0
109010901095
CR-CHCR-NR CR-LRCR
-
L
R
CR-LR
CR-
R
RCR-CH11
6
+
7
9
117+
0
0
1
0
90
1
0
9
51095 1
0
9
3 108711
6
+
7
9
113+00114+0011
5
+
0
0
116+00
BULL CREEK
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING REMNANT
MILL WALL
STA 116+79
END RIFFLE BEFORE
IMPACTING MILL STRUCTURE
END RESTORATIONCR-RRC
R
-
R
R
CR
-
C
H
CR-CH
1091
1
0
9
41092MATCH LINE - STA 113+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.5October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1072
1075
1080
1085
1072
1075
1080
1085
150+00 150+50 151+00 151+50 152+00 152+50 153+00 153+50 154+00 154+50
-1.0%
-1.0%
-1.6%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 150+00
ELEV = 1078.00 STA = 150+77ELEV = 1075.00STA = 150+62ELEV = 1078.70STA = 150+69
ELEV = 1075.00
STA = 150+69
ELEV = 1075.00 STA = 150+85ELEV = 1078.70STA = 151+53ELEV = 1078.00STA = 151+72ELEV = 1076.80STA = 151+91ELEV = 1076.80STA = 152+11ELEV = 1078.00STA = 152+59ELEV = 1077.50STA = 152+84ELEV = 1075.95STA = 153+08ELEV = 1075.95STA = 153+33ELEV = 1077.50STA = 153+77ELEV = 1076.80STA = 153+78
ELEV = 1073.50 STA = 154+42ELEV = 1073.50XXXXXXX
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
150+00
15
1
+
0
0
152+00
153+00
154+
0
0 155+004
1
1
+
0
0
310+00310+82107
5
10
7
5
1080
1080
108010801
0
8
0
1
0
8
0
CR-
N
R
CR-NR
C
R
-
N
R
CR-NRCR-CH
CONSTRUCT CATTLE
CROSSING USING
TERRACELL 140
MATERIAL DETAIL
SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.5
STA. 150+30
BEGIN BULL CREEK REACH 3
BULL CREEK
UT2EXISTING 84" CMP
INV IN: 1078.96
INV OUT: 1078.30
EXISTING 84" CMP
INV IN: 1079.08
INV OUT: 1077.99
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL 1
0
7
81078
SHEET 2.5
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

1
5
4
+
5
0
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.6October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1070
1075
1080
1085
1070
1075
1080
1085
153+50 154+00 154+50 155+00 155+50 156+00 156+50 157+00 157+50
-1.6%
-1.3%
-1.3%
-1.2%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUNDSTA = 153+77ELEV = 1076.80STA = 153+78
ELEV = 1073.50 STA = 154+42ELEV = 1073.50STA = 154+75ELEV = 1076.50STA = 155+25ELEV = 1075.86STA = 155+27
ELEV = 1074.06 STA = 155+42ELEV = 1074.06STA = 155+50ELEV = 1075.80STA = 155+94ELEV = 1075.24STA = 155+96
ELEV = 1073.49 STA = 156+24ELEV = 1073.49STA = 156+38ELEV = 1075.14STA = 156+92ELEV = 1074.51STA = 157+32ELEV = 1074.42STA = 157+32ELEV = 1074.42STA = 156+93
ELEV = 1072.76 STA = 157+19ELEV = 1072.76STA = 157+19ELEV = 1072.76C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECE154+00155+00
156+00
157+00
412+001
0
7
5
1075
1080
10801085CR-NRCR-NR
CR-NR CR-LRCR-CH
STEP POOL CONVEYANCESEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.4
FILL IN WETLAND UT3FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
BULL CREEK1078
108010831082MATCH LINE - STA 154+50MATCH LINE - STA 157+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.7October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1068
1070
1075
1080
1085
1068
1070
1075
1080
1085
157+50 158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50 160+00 160+50
1064
1065
1070
1075
-1.6%
-0.8%
-1.0%
-1.3%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
CULVERT STA = 160+38ELEV = 1070.41STA = 160+38ELEV = 1070.41STA = 159+85
ELEV = 1070.41
STA = 159+85
ELEV = 1070.41STA = 159+83ELEV = 1072.06STA = 159+83ELEV = 1072.06STA = 159+31ELEV = 1072.89STA = 159+31ELEV = 1072.89STA = 159+25
ELEV = 1071.11
STA = 159+25
ELEV = 1071.11STA = 159+14
ELEV = 1071.11
STA = 159+14
ELEV = 1071.11 STA = 159+13ELEV = 1072.85STA = 159+13ELEV = 1072.85STA = 158+63ELEV = 1073.25STA = 158+63ELEV = 1073.25STA = 158+58
ELEV = 1071.63
STA = 158+58
ELEV = 1071.63
STA = 158+50
ELEV = 1071.63
STA = 158+50
ELEV = 1071.63 STA = 158+48ELEV = 1073.46STA = 158+48ELEV = 1073.46STA = 158+14ELEV = 1073.80STA = 158+14ELEV = 1073.80STA = 158+00ELEV = 1072.15STA = 158+00ELEV = 1072.15STA = 157+71ELEV = 1073.90STA = 157+72
ELEV = 1072.15
STA = 157+72
ELEV = 1072.15
XXXXXXXXXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS157+00
158+00
159+00
160+00
161+001070107010751075
107510751
0
8
0 10851
0
9
0
DUAL 54" x 36" CMP
ARCH PIPE (33LF EACH)
STA. 158+71
U/S INV. :1072.68
D/S INV.: 1072.42
ROADWAY ELEV.: 1077
SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.15
1075
CR-
C
H
CR-NR
CR-NR
CR-NR
CR-JZREMOVE EXISTING FENCE
BULL CREEK
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
1
0
7
0
1
0
7
0
EXISTING GROUND AT
5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
160+00MATCH LINE - STA 157+50MATCH LI
N
E -
S
T
A
1
6
0
+
5
0
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.8October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1064
1065
1070
1075
1064
1065
1070
1075
160+50 161+00 161+50 162+00 162+50 163+00 163+50 164+00 164+50 165+00
-1.9%
-1.9%
-1.8%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 164+99ELEV = 1066.52STA = 164+99ELEV = 1066.52STA = 164+81ELEV = 1065.07STA = 164+81ELEV = 1065.07STA = 164+64ELEV = 1065.07STA = 164+64ELEV = 1065.07STA = 164+47ELEV = 1066.71STA = 164+47ELEV = 1066.71STA = 163+74ELEV = 1068.05STA = 163+74ELEV = 1068.05STA = 162+98ELEV = 1068.45STA = 162+12ELEV = 1070.05STA = 162+12ELEV = 1070.05STA = 161+93ELEV = 1067.14STA = 161+93ELEV = 1067.14STA = 161+58ELEV = 1067.14STA = 161+58ELEV = 1067.14STA = 161+56ELEV = 1070.26STA = 161+56ELEV = 1070.26STA = 160+65
ELEV = 1071.87
STA = 160+65
ELEV = 1071.87
STA = 162+99
ELEV = 1065.31 STA = 163+49ELEV = 1065.31STA = 163+49ELEV = 1065.31CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE161
+
0
0
162+00163+0016
4
+
0
0
165+00166+00
1065
1070
1070
1070
1070
1070
1075
10701070
CR-JZ CR-RRCR
-
L
R
CR-CHBULL CREEK
BULL CREEK
1070
1070
FILL EXISTING
CHANNEL
EXISTING TRAIL165+00MATCH LINE - STA 160+50MATCH LINE - STA 165+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.9October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1060
1065
1070
1075
1060
1065
1070
1075
165+00 165+50 166+00 166+50 167+00 167+50 167+70
-1.2%
-1.8%
-1.9%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 167+56
ELEV = 1063.34STA = 167+42ELEV = 1063.51STA = 167+42ELEV = 1063.51STA = 167+27ELEV = 1060.52STA = 167+27ELEV = 1060.52STA = 167+12ELEV = 1060.52STA = 167+12ELEV = 1060.52STA = 166+97ELEV = 1063.68STA = 166+97ELEV = 1063.68STA = 166+32ELEV = 1064.87STA = 166+32ELEV = 1064.87STA = 165+59ELEV = 1065.37STA = 165+60
ELEV = 1062.10 STA = 166+08ELEV = 1062.10STA = 166+08ELEV = 1062.10CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
167+56
16
4
+
0
0
165+00166+0
0
1
6
7
+
0
0
1065
1065
1065
1070
1070
1070
1070
10701070
EXISTING
TRAIL1070
1070
CR
-
L
R
CR-CHC
R
-
L
R
167+56
168+00
169+00
SITE WILL BE GRADED TO
FACILITATE RESTORATION
PROJECT. TRAIL WILL
TERMINATE ON THE LEFT BANK,
OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT
STA. 167+56
END REACH 3 RESTORATION
START REACH 4 PRESERVATION MATCH LINE - STA 167+70BULL CREEK
EXISTING TRAIL
MATCH LINE - STA 165+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTION005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.10October 15, 2018T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 4Stream Plan and ProfileSheet Index
N
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE167
+
5
6
16
6
+
0
0
167+001065
1065
1070
10701070
1
0
7
5
EXISTING
TRAIL
STA 167+56
END REACH 3 RESTORATION
START REACH 4 PRESERVATIONCR-LR167
+
5
6
168+00
169+00
170+00 171+00172+00
MATCH LINE - STA 167+70BULL CREEK
MATCH LINE - STA 172+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTION005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.11October 15, 2018T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 4Stream Plan and ProfileSheet Index
N
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
X
XXXXXCE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESTA. 174+18
END REACH 4
PRESERVATION
174+39
171+00
172+00
173+00
174+00
BULL CREEK
MATCH LINE - STA 172+00174+39
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.12October 15, 2018Sheet Index
Typical SectionN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2 3:13:
1
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
1105
1110
1115
1120
1105
1110
1115
1120
200+20 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00
EXISTING
GROUND PROPOSED CULVERT
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
0.8%
STA = 200+21.20
ELEV = 1120.12
STA = 200+79.84
ELEV = 1119.02
STA = 200+85.84
ELEV = 1116.52
STA = 200+89.44
ELEV = 1118.02
STA = 201+06.73
ELEV = 1117.51
STA = 201+12.67
ELEV = 1115.18
STA = 201+16.27
ELEV = 1116.68
STA = 201+28.98
ELEV = 1116.21
STA = 202+26.21ELEV = 1113.38STA = 202+36.21ELEV = 1111.38STA = 202+44.48ELEV = 1113.03STA = 203+05.01ELEV = 1109.79STA = 203+15.01ELEV = 1111.79STA = 203+46.89ELEV = 1110.58STA = 203+76.89ELEV = 1110.34STA = 202+89.48
ELEV = 1109.79STA = 202+88.32ELEV = 1111.79STA = 200+81.36
ELEV = 1116.52
STA = 201+07.61
ELEV = 1115.18 STA = 202+71.28ELEV = 1112.28STA = 203+19.04
ELEV = 1111.65
XXXXXXXXSAFSAF SAF200+00
201+00 202+00
203+00
204+00
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS49" x 33" CMP ARCH PIPE (28 LF)STA. 203+47U/S INV. :1110.6D/S INV.: 1110.3ROADWAY ELEV.: 1114.5SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.11
EXISTING FENCE
TO BE REMOVED
WITHIN EASEMENT
STA 200+21
START REACH UT1A
DO NOT DISTURBMAGNOLIA TREE
PROPOSED GRASSFARM ROAD
GRADE BANK 3:1MAT AND LIVE STAKEREMOVE EXISTINGCULVERT
PROPOSEDROCK SILL (TYP.)
BANK GRADING 3:1 ANDPROFILE ADJUSTMENTMAT AND LIVE STAKESEE TYPICAL SECTION
UT1
1120
1
1
2
5
1130
1135
1140
1125
11201125
11
1
5
11
1
5 11141114
EXISTING GROUND
5:1 OR FLATTER
EXISTING GROUND5:1 OR FLATTER
200+00
CR-CH CR-CH
CR-C
H
CR-CH
CR-CH
CR-CHMATCH LINE - STA 204+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.13October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
Typical Section
3:13:
1
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
1100
1105
1110
1115
1100
1105
1110
1115
204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00
EXISTING GROUNDSTA = 204+25.77ELEV = 1109.34PROPOSED GRADE
204+00205+00
206+00
207+00 208+00CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSSAFCECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
UT1
1125
1120
111411081110
1115
1120
111
0
111
3 1125
1105
11
0
6
1120
1115
1
1
1
0
205+00
CR-CH
MATCH LINE - STA 204+00MATCH LINE - STA 207+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.14October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
Typical Section
3:13:
1
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
1095
1100
1105
1110
1095
1100
1105
1110
207+00 207+50 208+00 208+50 208+85
EXISTING
GROUND
X
X
XXXX206+
0
0
207+00 208+00 R/W WIDTH 60' PER DB: 298 PG: 489SAF CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
1105
11
0
5
111
0
1115
112
0
208+85
209+00
21
0
+
0
0
208+85
209+00
21
0
+
0
0
11
0
0
110
5
CR
-
N
R
CR-NR
C
R
-
W
R
STA 208+85
END UT1A (ENHANCEMENT II)
BEGIN UT1B (RESTORATION)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN EASEMENT
UT1
CR-NR
CR
-
N
R
CR-WR
MATCH LINE - STA 208+85AVOID EXISTING
WETLANDS
1108
1110
1115
1105
1
1
0
6
1120
1115
1
1
1
0
208+85
21
0
+
0
0MATCH LINE - STA 207+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.15October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1087
1090
1095
1100
1105
1087
1090
1095
1100
1105
208+85 209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50 213+00
-4.0%
-3.1%
-4.8
%
-4.7
%
-3.7%
-4.9
%
-4.7
%
-3.8%
-0.8%-5.9%
-4.2%
-5.0
%
-5.3%
-5.1%
-4.2%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
CULVERTSTA = 208+85
ELEV = 1102.46
STA = 208+93
ELEV = 1102.17
STA = 208+93
ELEV = 1100.94
STA = 209+05
ELEV = 1100.94
STA = 209+10
ELEV = 1101.67
STA = 209+30
ELEV = 1101.07
STA = 209+30
ELEV = 1099.86
STA = 209+36
ELEV = 1099.86
STA = 209+39
ELEV = 1100.77
STA = 209+50
ELEV = 1100.23
STA = 209+51
ELEV = 1099.21
STA = 209+57
ELEV = 1099.21
STA = 209+60
ELEV = 1100.10
STA = 209+72
ELEV = 1099.53
STA = 209+73
ELEV = 1098.51 STA = 209+79
ELEV = 1098.51
STA = 209+82
ELEV = 1099.40
STA = 210+16
ELEV = 1098.13
STA = 210+17
ELEV = 1097.11
STA = 210+23
ELEV = 1097.11
STA = 210+26
ELEV = 1098.01 STA = 210+38ELEV = 1097.44STA = 210+38
ELEV = 1096.43
STA = 210+45
ELEV = 1096.43 STA = 210+48ELEV = 1097.32STA = 210+61ELEV = 1096.73STA = 210+61
ELEV = 1095.72
STA = 210+67
ELEV = 1095.72 STA = 210+70ELEV = 1096.61STA = 210+86ELEV = 1096.03STA = 210+86
ELEV = 1094.95
STA = 210+90
ELEV = 1094.95
STA = 210+93
ELEV = 1095.70 STA = 211+39ELEV = 1095.33STA = 211+40
ELEV = 1094.41
STA = 211+45
ELEV = 1094.41 STA = 211+48ELEV = 1095.31STA = 211+60ELEV = 1094.60STA = 211+61
ELEV = 1093.48
STA = 211+67
ELEV = 1093.48 STA = 211+70ELEV = 1094.43STA = 211+82ELEV = 1093.90STA = 211+83
ELEV = 1092.55
STA = 211+89
ELEV = 1092.55STA = 211+92ELEV = 1093.50STA = 212+05ELEV = 1092.84STA = 212+05
ELEV = 1091.59
STA = 212+11
ELEV = 1091.59STA = 212+14ELEV = 1092.54STA = 212+52
ELEV = 1089.61
STA = 212+58
ELEV = 1089.61 STA = 212+61ELEV = 1090.56STA = 212+74ELEV = 1089.89STA = 212+74
ELEV = 1088.66 STA = 212+80
ELEV = 1088.66STA = 212+84ELEV = 1089.59STA = 212+97ELEV = 1088.91STA = 212+97
ELEV = 1087.68STA = 212+52ELEV = 1090.96STA = 212+52ELEV = 1090.96X
X
XXXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECE1090
109
0
109
5
1095
11001105
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
57" x 38" CMP PIPEARCH (39LF)STA. 210+97U/S INV. :1095.16D/S INV.: 1094.85ROADWAY ELEV.: 1101SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.12
208+85209+00
210+0
0
211+00 212+00
213+00208+85209+00
210+0
0
211+00
212+00
213+00
END REACH UT1B
START REACH UT1C
STA. 210+97
STA. 208+85
END REACH UT1A
START REACH UT1B
10
9
0
1095
10
9
5
1100
1100
1105
CR-NR
CR-NR
CR-
W
R
CR-CH
CR-CH
CR-CH
CR-CH CR-RR
CR-RR CR-CH
116+00UT1
CR-NRCR-NR CR-WR
CR-C
H
C
R
-
R
R
CR-R
R
CR-RR CR-CHCR-CH
MATCH LINE - STA 208+851094
1092EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER208+85210+0
0
SHEET 2.
1
4
START REACH UT1C
STA. 211+36 MATCH LINE - STA 213+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1CStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.16October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1082
1085
1090
1095
1082
1085
1090
1095
213+00 213+50 214+00 214+50 215+00
-4.2%
-4.4
%
-4.2%
-4.2%
-4.4
%
-4.2%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
TIE IN TO THALWEG
BULL CREEK REACH 2
STA 116+65
ELEV1084.61
TIE IN TO BANKFULL
BULL CREEK REACH 2STA = 213+93ELEV = 1085.41STA = 213+03
ELEV = 1087.68
STA = 213+07
ELEV = 1088.61 STA = 213+24ELEV = 1087.87STA = 213+24
ELEV = 1086.52
STA = 213+30
ELEV = 1086.52 STA = 213+33ELEV = 1087.47STA = 213+49ELEV = 1086.80STA = 213+49
ELEV = 1085.54
STA = 213+52
ELEV = 1085.54
STA = 213+54
ELEV = 1086.60
STA = 213+93
ELEV = 1084.92
X
XXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSC
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECE10851085
1090
1090
1090
10901095
1095
1095
1095
1100
1100
110511101115213+93212+00
213+00
1090
10
9
0
1095
10
9
5
CR-LRCR-RRCR-CHCR-CH CR-RR
CR-RR
CR-CH 116+79117+00118+00
57" x 38" CMP ARCH
PIPE (39LF)
STA. 210+97
U/S INV. :1095.16
D/S INV.: 1094.85
ROADWAY ELEV.: 1101
SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.12
STA 213+93
END UT1C
1087116+79116+00CR
-
R
R
CR-RR
CR-RRCR-CHCR-CH
1094
1092MATCH LINE - STA 213+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.17October 15, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1087
1090
1095
1100
1087
1090
1095
1100
300+00 300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00 302+50 303+00 303+50
-0.0%-4.0%
-3.0%
-3.0%
-2.9%
-3.2%
-3.8%
-3.6%
-4.1%
-3.4%
-4.0%
-0.8%
-0.0%-4.0%
-3.0%
-3.0%
-2.9%
-3.2%
-3.8%
-3.6%
-4.1%
-3.4%
-4.0%
-0.8%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
CULVERT
STA = 300+00
ELEV = 1097.34
STA = 300+09
ELEV = 1097.34
STA = 300+14
ELEV = 1097.50
STA = 300+39
ELEV = 1096.49
STA = 300+39
ELEV = 1095.53
STA = 300+45
ELEV = 1095.53
STA = 300+49
ELEV = 1096.09
STA = 300+62
ELEV = 1095.70
STA = 300+62
ELEV = 1094.97
STA = 300+66
ELEV = 1094.97
STA = 300+69
ELEV = 1095.64 STA = 300+87ELEV = 1095.09STA = 300+87
ELEV = 1094.38
STA = 300+93
ELEV = 1094.38 STA = 300+97ELEV = 1095.00STA = 301+20ELEV = 1094.34STA = 301+20
ELEV = 1093.63
STA = 301+26
ELEV = 1093.63 STA = 301+29ELEV = 1094.25STA = 301+50ELEV = 1093.59STA = 301+51
ELEV = 1092.90
STA = 301+59
ELEV = 1092.90 STA = 301+64ELEV = 1093.46STA = 301+74ELEV = 1093.05STA = 301+75
ELEV = 1092.35
STA = 301+83
ELEV = 1092.35 STA = 301+87ELEV = 1092.93STA = 302+03ELEV = 1092.35STA = 302+04
ELEV = 1091.68
STA = 302+13
ELEV = 1091.68 STA = 302+18ELEV = 1092.21STA = 302+26
ELEV = 1091.91
STA = 302+26
ELEV = 1091.16
STA = 302+35
ELEV = 1091.16 STA = 302+40ELEV = 1091.71STA = 302+58ELEV = 1091.11STA = 302+59
ELEV = 1090.43
STA = 302+67
ELEV = 1090.43 STA = 302+72ELEV = 1090.99STA = 302+85ELEV = 1090.46STA = 302+85
ELEV = 1089.76STA = 302+98
ELEV = 1089.76 STA = 303+05ELEV = 1090.06XXXXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS300+00
301+00
302
+
0
0
303+00
304+001095
10
9
510
9
5
1
0
9
5
1100
1100
110
0
1100
1100
1105
11051105
1105110511
0
5
1105111011
1
0
1110
1
1
1
5
1
1
2
0
STA. 350+00
START REACH UT2
STA 303+15END REACH UT2A
350+42
350+00
1100
1100CR-CHCR
-
C
H
CR-CH
CR-NR
CR-CH
CR-RRCR-W
R CR-CHCR-NR
CR-
N
R
CR-NR
42"x 29" CMP ARCH
PIPE (34LF)
STA. 303+15
U/S INV. :1089.48
D/S INV.: 1089.22
ROADWAY ELEV.: 1094
SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.13
START REACH UT2A
STA 300+00
1090
1090
1100
1100
1098
1097
1097
UT2
CR-CH
CR-
C
H
CR
-
C
H
CR-
R
R
CR-NR
EXI
S
T
I
N
G

S
P
R
I
N
G
BO
X
EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
STA 303+50
START REACH UT2B
MATCH LINE - STA 303+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2BStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.18October 15, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1080
1085
1090
1095
1080
1085
1090
1095
303+50 304+00 304+50 305+00 305+50 306+00 306+50 307+00 307+50 308+00
-2.0%-2.0%
-2.8%
-3.4%
-2.7%
-3.6%
-3.1%
-3.4%
-4.1%
-3.9%
-3.6%
-3.6%
-3.8%
-3.9%
-2.8%
-3.4%
-2.7%
-3.6%
-3.1%
-3.4%
-4.1%
-3.9%
-3.6%
-3.6%
-3.8%
-3.9%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 303+60
ELEV = 1089.62
STA = 303+63
ELEV = 1088.85
STA = 303+65
ELEV = 1088.85
STA = 303+68
ELEV = 1089.62
STA = 303+80
ELEV = 1089.26
STA = 303+81
ELEV = 1088.41
STA = 303+89
ELEV = 1088.41
STA = 303+94
ELEV = 1089.15
STA = 304+10ELEV = 1088.59STA = 304+11
ELEV = 1087.78STA = 304+23
ELEV = 1087.78 STA = 304+29ELEV = 1088.44STA = 304+51ELEV = 1087.84STA = 304+52
ELEV = 1086.99
STA = 304+61
ELEV = 1086.99 STA = 304+65ELEV = 1087.73STA = 304+80ELEV = 1087.19STA = 304+81
ELEV = 1086.38
STA = 304+94
ELEV = 1086.38 STA = 305+00ELEV = 1087.03STA = 305+24ELEV = 1086.30STA = 305+25
ELEV = 1085.50
STA = 305+38
ELEV = 1085.50 STA = 305+45ELEV = 1086.13STA = 305+59ELEV = 1085.68STA = 305+59
ELEV = 1084.84
STA = 305+69
ELEV = 1084.84 STA = 305+74ELEV = 1085.55STA = 305+91ELEV = 1084.88STA = 305+91
ELEV = 1084.15
STA = 306+06
ELEV = 1084.15 STA = 306+13ELEV = 1084.70STA = 306+27ELEV = 1084.16STA = 306+36
ELEV = 1083.45STA = 306+44
ELEV = 1083.45 STA = 306+53ELEV = 1084.16STA = 306+68ELEV = 1083.62STA = 306+76
ELEV = 1082.90
STA = 306+85
ELEV = 1082.90 STA = 306+93ELEV = 1083.62STA = 307+09ELEV = 1083.06STA = 307+17
ELEV = 1082.35
STA = 307+26
ELEV = 1082.35 STA = 307+34ELEV = 1083.06STA = 307+45ELEV = 1082.67STA = 307+45
ELEV = 1081.86
STA = 307+62
ELEV = 1081.86STA = 307+71ELEV = 1082.57STA = 307+89ELEV = 1081.88STA = 308+00ELEV = 1081.23CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE
CECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS304+003
0
5
+
0
0
306+00 307+00308+001085
1085
1090
1090
10
9
0
10
9
0
1095
1095
1095
1100
1100
1100
1105
AVOID EXISTING UTILITY
POLE AND GUY WIRES
1085
1085
1090
1090
CR-NR
CR-
N
R
CR-NRCR
-
C
H
CR-NR
C
R
-N
R
CR-WR
CR
-
C
H
CR-NRCR-
C
H CR-NRCR
-
C
H
CR-
C
H CR-WDCR-CH1090
10
9
0
10901090 UT2
STA 306+13
END REACH UT2B
BEGIN REACH UT2C
CR-NR
3
0
5
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 303+50MATCH LINE - STA 308+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2CStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.19October 15, 2018Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1075
1080
1085
1090
1075
1080
1085
1090
308+00 308+50 309+00 309+50 310+00 310+50 310+90
-3.1%
-3.4%
-3.4%
-3.5%
-2.9%
-4.5
%
-1.4%
-3.1%
-3.4%
-3.4%
-3.5%
-2.9%
-4.5
%
-1.4%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
TIE IN TO
BULL CREEK REACH 3
STA 151+20.87
ELEV: 1078.33
TIE IN TO BANKFULL
BULL CREEK REACH 3STA = 308+11ELEV = 1081.23STA = 308+22ELEV = 1081.88STA = 308+37ELEV = 1081.40STA = 308+44
ELEV = 1080.63
STA = 308+51
ELEV = 1080.63 STA = 308+57ELEV = 1081.40STA = 308+75ELEV = 1080.79STA = 308+84
ELEV = 1080.08
STA = 308+93
ELEV = 1080.08 STA = 309+02ELEV = 1080.79STA = 309+18ELEV = 1080.25STA = 309+26
ELEV = 1079.52
STA = 309+34
ELEV = 1079.52 STA = 309+42ELEV = 1080.25STA = 309+57ELEV = 1079.72STA = 309+65
ELEV = 1078.99
STA = 309+73
ELEV = 1078.99 STA = 309+81ELEV = 1079.72STA = 310+01ELEV = 1079.14STA = 310+09
ELEV = 1078.39 STA = 310+17
ELEV = 1078.39STA = 310+24ELEV = 1079.14STA = 310+33ELEV = 1078.76STA = 310+39
ELEV = 1077.98
STA = 310+46
ELEV = 1077.98STA = 310+52ELEV = 1078.76STA = 310+82ELEV = 1078.35XXXXXXXXCE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECE150+00151+00152+00307+00308+0030
9
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
8
2
1
0
8
5
1085
10901090
REMOVE OLDUTILITY POLE
1080
10801085
1085 CR-NRCR-NRCR
-
C
H
CR-
C
H CR-WDC
R
-
C
H CR-CHC
R
-
N
R
CR-CHC
R
-
CH CR-CHCR-CHMAINTAIN UTILITYPOLE AND GUY WIRES
STA 310+82END UT2C
1084
UT2
MATCH LINE - STA 308+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2Stream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.20October 15, 2018Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1090
1095
1100
1105
1090
1095
1100
1105
350+00 350+50
-4.9%
-5.8%
-3.6%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
STA = 350+00
ELEV = 1099.29
STA = 350+06
ELEV = 1098.98STA = 350+10
ELEV = 1097.95
STA = 350+42
ELEV = 1096.79
STA = 350+31
ELEV = 1096.90STA = 350+26ELEV = 1097.99STA = 350+26ELEV = 1097.99STA = 350+35ELEV = 1097.19STA = 350+35ELEV = 1097.19STA = 350+14
ELEV = 1098.43
STA = 350+14
ELEV = 1098.43
XXXXXRE
F
.
:

D
B
:

1
6
7

P
G
:

5
8
1
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECE300+00301+00302+00
10951095
1095
1100110011051105
1105
1105
110511051
1
0
5
1105
1110
1110
1110 11101115
1115
1120
1120
350+42
350+00STA.350+00START REACH UT2 SEE SHEET 2.18
END REACH UT2
1100
1100
CR-CHCR-CH CR-CHCR-NRCR-CH CR-RRCR-WR CR-CHCR-NR1100
1100
1098
1097
1097UT2
CR-CH
CR-CH
CR-CH
CR-RR
EXISTING SPRINGBOX
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT3AStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.21October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
Typical Section
3:13:
1
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
GRADE
1089
1090
1095
1100
1105
1089
1090
1095
1100
1105
400+64 401+00 401+50 402+00 402+50 403+00 403+50 404+00 404+50 404+70
PROPOSED
GRADE STA = 401+67.85ELEV = 1097.60STA = 401+78.50ELEV = 1097.07STA = 401+79.36
ELEV = 1095.27
STA = 401+84.60
ELEV = 1095.27 STA = 401+87.38ELEV = 1096.57STA = 401+97.16ELEV = 1096.08STA = 401+98.00
ELEV = 1094.28
STA = 402+03.25
ELEV = 1094.28 STA = 402+06.04ELEV = 1095.58STA = 402+15.81ELEV = 1095.09STA = 402+16.66
ELEV = 1093.29
STA = 402+21.91
ELEV = 1093.29STA = 402+24.33ELEV = 1094.42STA = 402+41.51ELEV = 1093.75PROPOSED
BOULDER SILL
X
XXXXXXXXXX X X X
X
X
X
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE
CE CE 404+7140
0
+
0
0
401+00
40
2
+
0
0
403+00
404+00
405+00
CR-CHCR-NR
STA.400+57START UT3A ENHANCEMENT II
MATCH LINE - STA 404+70STA.404+70END REACH UT3A ENHANCEMENT IISTART REACH UT3B RESTORATION
BANK GRADING ANDPROFILE ADJUSTMENT
UT3
REMOVE ANDHARVEST TREE
REMOVE DEAD TREE AND GRADETHALWEG
450+56
450+00
STA 450+38START UT3 ENHANCEMENT II
STA 450+56END UT3
MOVE STREAMCENTERLINE
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT3BStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.22October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1075
1080
1085
1090
1075
1080
1085
1090
404+70 405+00 405+50 406+00 406+50 407+00 407+50 408+00 408+50 409+00
-3.9%
-4.8
%
-4.9
%
-4.1%
-4.1%
-3.8%
-3.9%
-4.4%
-4.2%
-4.3%
-4.0%
-0.4%-2.0%
-2.7%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
PROPOSED
CULVERT
STA = 404+71
ELEV = 1089.75
STA = 404+81
ELEV = 1089.34
STA = 404+81
ELEV = 1088.59
STA = 404+88
ELEV = 1088.59
STA = 404+91
ELEV = 1089.04STA = 405+06
ELEV = 1088.31
STA = 405+06
ELEV = 1087.71
STA = 405+12
ELEV = 1087.71STA = 405+14
ELEV = 1088.19
STA = 405+33
ELEV = 1087.28
STA = 405+33
ELEV = 1086.69
STA = 405+41
ELEV = 1086.69
STA = 405+45
ELEV = 1087.08
STA = 405+59
ELEV = 1086.51
STA = 405+59
ELEV = 1085.89
STA = 405+64
ELEV = 1085.89
STA = 405+67
ELEV = 1086.41
STA = 405+82
ELEV = 1085.78
STA = 405+83
ELEV = 1085.17
STA = 405+88
ELEV = 1085.17
STA = 405+91
ELEV = 1085.68 STA = 406+11ELEV = 1084.92STA = 406+11
ELEV = 1084.31
STA = 406+17
ELEV = 1084.31STA = 406+20ELEV = 1084.81STA = 406+37ELEV = 1084.13STA = 406+38
ELEV = 1083.52
STA = 406+42
ELEV = 1083.52STA = 406+45ELEV = 1084.03STA = 406+60ELEV = 1083.36STA = 406+61
ELEV = 1082.77
STA = 406+68
ELEV = 1082.77STA = 406+72ELEV = 1083.22STA = 406+86ELEV = 1082.63STA = 406+87
ELEV = 1082.02
STA = 406+92
ELEV = 1082.02STA = 406+95ELEV = 1082.53STA = 407+10ELEV = 1081.88STA = 407+11
ELEV = 1081.28
STA = 407+17
ELEV = 1081.28STA = 407+20ELEV = 1081.76STA = 407+35ELEV = 1081.16STA = 407+36
ELEV = 1080.48
STA = 407+44
ELEV = 1080.48STA = 407+48ELEV = 1080.57STA = 408+23ELEV = 1080.25STA = 408+28
ELEV = 1079.52
STA = 408+34
ELEV = 1079.52 STA = 408+40ELEV = 1080.25STA = 408+52ELEV = 1080.00STA = 408+53
ELEV = 1079.03STA = 408+71ELEV = 1079.03STA = 408+81ELEV = 1079.83X
X X X X X
X
XXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS404+71405+00
4
0
6
+
0
0
407+00
408+00
409+0
0
410+00
10801080
1085
1085
1085
108510901090
109
0
1095
1095
1100
1100
49"x 33" CMP ARCH
PIPE (32LF)
STA. 407+77
U/S INV. :1080.0
D/S INV.: 1079.7
ROADWAY ELEV.: 1084
SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.14
EXISTING SHED
DO NOT DISTURB
STA. 404+70
END REACH UT3A (ENHANCEMENT II)
START REACH UT3B (RESTORATION)
STA 407+77
END REACH UT3B
1090
1090
CR-CHCR-NR CR-WR CR
-
N
R
CR-CH
CR-NR
CR-N
R
CR-NR
CR-WRCR-WR CR-CH CR-NRCR-N
R CR-WRCR-NR
1
0
8
5MATCH LINE - STA 404+701077UT3
UT3
C
R
-
C
H
CR-NR1079
108110801083
1085EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
EXISTING GROUND AT5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
STA 408+12
BEGIN UT3C MATCH LINE - STA 409+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-PLANS.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT3CStream Plan and Profile005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE2.23October 15, 2018Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
2.1
2.2 2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.20
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.5
2.10 2.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
1070
1075
1080
1085
1070
1075
1080
1085
409+00 409+50 410+00 410+50 411+00 411+50 412+00 412+24
-1.7%
-2.0%
-2.2%
-2.3%
-2.0%
-2.4%
-2.1%
PROPOSED
BANKFULL
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING
GROUND
TIE IN TO THALWEG
BULL CREEK REACH 3
STA 155+99.04
ELEV1075.15
TIE IN TO BANKFULL
BULL CREEK REACH 3
STA = 409+08
ELEV = 1079.10
STA = 409+10
ELEV = 1078.16
STA = 409+33
ELEV = 1078.16
STA = 409+46
ELEV = 1078.88
STA = 409+75
ELEV = 1078.39
STA = 409+77
ELEV = 1077.37
STA = 409+87
ELEV = 1077.37
STA = 409+93
ELEV = 1078.31
STA = 410+21
ELEV = 1077.76
STA = 410+22
ELEV = 1076.77
STA = 410+40
ELEV = 1076.77 STA = 410+50ELEV = 1077.61STA = 410+76ELEV = 1077.04STA = 410+77
ELEV = 1076.08
STA = 410+99
ELEV = 1076.08 STA = 411+11ELEV = 1076.88STA = 411+22ELEV = 1076.62STA = 411+24
ELEV = 1075.59
STA = 411+33
ELEV = 1075.59 STA = 411+38ELEV = 1076.50STA = 411+60ELEV = 1076.05STA = 411+63
ELEV = 1075.16
STA = 411+66
ELEV = 1075.16 STA = 411+69ELEV = 1076.05STA = 411+87ELEV = 1075.60STA = 411+93
ELEV = 1074.80
STA = 411+98
ELEV = 1074.80 STA = 412+03ELEV = 1075.60STA = 412+03ELEV = 1075.60CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS155+00156+00407+00
408+00
40
9
+
0
0
410+
0
0
411+00 412+00
1075
1075108010801080
1085
1085 10901
0
9
0 CR-NRCR-NRCR-LRCR-NR
CR-WR CR-WR
CR-CH CR-NRCR
-
N
R CR-WRCR-
N
R CR-NRCR-
N
R
CR-WR
CR-NR
407+77
END UT3B
10851077UT3
1078
BULL CREEK1078
10
7
91081
108010831085
155+00412+24
410+
0
0
412+24END UT3C
408+12START UT3C
MATCH LINE - STA 409+00
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestGrading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.1October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
TCE TCE
TCE
TCETCETCETCETCE
TCE TCETCETCETCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECE
CE
CE CECECE
CE CECECE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECEX
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXX XXXXXXXX1095
1
1
0
0
11051
1
0
5
1105
1105
1
1
0
5
110511
1
0
11001105
111011151120
1125
1130
113511051110 109511001105100+95101+00
102+00103+00
104+00105+0010
6
+
0
0
107+00108+00 109+00110+00 111+00112+00 113+00114+00BULL CREEKLODLODLO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD LODL
O
D
LODLO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LODLOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODMATCH
L
INE

-

STA
111+50
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestGrading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.2October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2TCETCETCETCETCETCE
TCE
TCETCECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS CE-XS CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSTCE TCE TCE TCETCETCETCETCETCE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
C
E
CE
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1090
1090109
5 1095110011001100111010
8
5
10
8
5 10901100
1105
1110
1115
11
2
0
11
2
5
11
3
0
1
1
3
5 110511101095
1100
1105
1110
11151120
11
2
5 1110150+00107+00
108+00109+00
110+00111+00
11
2
+
0
0 113+00114+00
1
1
5
+
0
0
116+00
1
1
6
+
7
9213+93211+00212+00213+00BULL CR
E
E
K
KEY ROADBULL CR
E
E
K
LODLODLO
D
LODLODLODLODL
O
D
L
O
D
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODL
O
D
L
O
D
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLOD LODLODMATCH LINE - STA 111+50
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastGrading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.3October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2 TCETCETCET
C
E
T
C
E
TCETCETCE TCETCETCETCE
TCE TCE TCE TCE
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XS CE-XS
CE-XSCE-XSCE
-
X
S
TCETCETCETCETCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE
-
X
S
CE-XS CE-XS
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX10801
0
8
0
108510851070
10701075
10751075
1075 10751075
1080 10851085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
10701070
1075107510751080
1085
1090
1095
1100
150+0
0
1
5
1
+
0
0
152+00 153
+
0
0
15
4
+
0
0
155+00
156+00 157+00158+00159+00160+001
6
1
+
0
0
162+00 163+00307
+
0
0
3
0
8
+
0
0309+00310+00310+82412+24407+00408+00409+00410+00411+0041
2
+
0
0
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
BULL CREEK
BUL
L

C
R
E
E
KKEY ROADK
E
Y

RO
A
D LODLODLODLODLODLO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LODLOD LOD LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLOD LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODMATCH LINE - STA 161+50
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastGrading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.4October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2TCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCE
TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE
TCE
TCE
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
SXXXXX
X
X
1065
1065
1070
107010701070
10701070
1075
10751075
1075
1
0
7
5 1075108510901070
1070
10751075107510801085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
11201125
156+00 157+00158+00159+00160+0016
1
+
0
0
162+0
0 163+0016
4
+
0
0
165+00166+0
0
1
6
7
+
0
0
167+56
412+24
41
2
+
0
0
BULL C
R
E
E
K
LODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD LOD
LOD LODLOD
LOD
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
L
O
D
LOD LOD
LODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODMATCH LINE - STA 161+50
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Grading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.5October 15, 2018NSheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2 TCECE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE-XSCE-XSX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSA
F SAF1105
1110
11051105
1110
1110
1115
11151120
11201125
1125
1130
1135
1105
1110
1115
1130
208+85 209+00MATCH LINE - STA 207+50UT1 LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD
LODLOD LOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLOD
LOD
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Grading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.6October 15, 2018NSheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2TCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCE CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSC
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
TCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECEX
XXX
X
X
X
XXX
X
XXXXX
X
10901090
1095
10
9
5
11001100
1100
110011051105
1
1
1
0
1110 108510851090
10951100110511101115
11201125
11051105
1110
1110
1115
11151120
11201125
1125
1130
1135
1105
1110
1115
1
1
1
0
11
1
5
11
2
0
11
2
5
1130
150+00
151+00
11
3
+
0
0114+00115+00116+00116+79310+82213+93
208+85
209+00 210+00
211+00 212+00
213+00MATCH LINE - STA 207+50UT1
KEY ROAD
BULL CREEKLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
L
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLOD LOD
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2Grading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.7October 15, 2018NSheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
run
cen
te
r
o
fvalley TCETCECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSTC
E TCETCETCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CE
CE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXXXXX1080
10801085
1085
1085 1085
1090
1090
1090
1090 1090
10951095
1
0
9
5
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
1100
1100
1100
1100
1105
1080150+00151+00152+00153+00154+00300+00301+00
302+
0
0
303+00
304+003
0
5
+
0
0
306+00 307+00308+0030
9
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
8
2
350+00
350+42
409+0
0
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1095
1100
1105
1110
UT2
BULL CREEKKEY ROAD
LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LO
D LODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLO
D
L
O
D
L
O
D
L
O
DLOD
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Grading Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT3Grading Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE3.8October 15, 2018NSheet Index
3.1
3.3
3.43.7
3.5
3.6
3.8
3.2
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
TCE
TCE
TCE TCETCETCETCETCECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS
CE-XSTCETCE
TC
E
TC
E
TCE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
XX
XXX10751
0
7
5 107510751075
1080108
5
1
0
8
5
1085
10
9
0
1090 1085109010951100151+00 152+00153+00154+00 155+00156+001
5
7
+
0
0158+001
5
9
+
0
0
310+82412+24
404+71
405
+
0
0
406+00407+00 408+00 40
9
+
0
0
410+
0
0
411+00 412+0010851090109511001105111011151120
110
5
111
0
1115
UT3
BULL CREEKLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD LODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LODLOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaPlant ListPlanting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.1October 15, 2018Streambank Planting Zone
Live Stakes and Herbaceous Plugs
Species Common
Name
Max
Spacing
Indiv.
Spacing
Min. Size Stratum # of
Stems
Physocarpus
opulifolius
Ninebark 8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 20%
Cornus
ammomum
Silky
Dogwood
8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 40%
Salix sericea Silky Willow 8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal.Shrub 40%
Juncus effusus Common
Rush
5 ft. 4-6 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb N\A
Carex alata Broadwing
Sedge
5 ft. 4-6 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb N\A
100%
Buffer Planting Zone
Bare Root
Species Common
Name
Max
Spacing
Indiv.
Spacing
Min.
Caliper
Size
Stratum # of Stems
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Quercus
phellos
Willow Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Platanus
occidentalis
Sycamore 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Betula nigra River Birch 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Quercus
michauxii
Swamp
Chestnut Oak
12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
100%
Permanent Riparian Seeding
Pure Live Seed (20 lbs/ acre)
Approved
Date
Species Name Common
Name
Stratum Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Panicum
rigidulum
Redtop
Panicgrass
Herb 1.5
All Year Agrostis
hyemalis
Winter
Bentgrass
Herb 1.5
All Year Chasmanthium
latifolium
Indian
Woodoats
Herb 1.5
All Year Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed
Susan
Herb 1.0
All Year Coreopsis
lanceolata
Lanceleaf
Coreopsis
Herb 0.2
All Year Carex
vulpinoidea
Fox Sedge Herb 1.5
All Year Panicum
clandestinum
Deertongue Herb 3.0
All Year Elymus
virginicus
Virginia Wild
Rye
Herb 2.5
All Year Panicum
virgatum
Switchgrass Herb 3.5
All Year Schizachyrium
scoparium
Little Bluestem Herb 2.5
All Year Asclepias syrica Common
Milkweed
Herb 0.5
All Year Lobelia
cardinalis L.
Cardinal Flower Herb 0.4
All Year Eupatorium
perfoliatum
Boneset Herb 0.2
All Year Liatris spicata Dense Blazing
Star
Herb 0.2
Temporary Seeding
Pure Live Seed
Approved
Date
Species Name Common
Name
Stratum Density
(lbs/acre)
Aug 15 -
May 1
Secale cereale Rye Grain Herb 140
May 1 -
Aug 15
Setaria italica German Millet Herb 50
Stabilization Seeding Outside Easement
Approved
Date
Species Name Stratum Common
Name
Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Festuca
arundinacea
Herb Tall Fescue 80
Pasture Seeding
Approved
Date
Species Name Stratum Common
Name
Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Festuca
arundinacea
Herb Tall Fescue 80
All disturbed areas.
Non-Pasture disturbed areas.
Pasture areas outside easement.
Streambank planting between bottoom
of bank and top of bank is not shown
on plan. See Detail 4, Sheet 6.5
for planting specifics.
Vernal Pool and Wetland Planting Zone
Herbaceous Plugs
Species Common
Name
Max
Spacing
Indiv.
Spacing
Min. Size Stratum # of
Stems
Calamagrostis
canadensis
Bluejoint
Grass
5 ft. 3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 30%
Carex alata Broadwing
Sedge
5 ft. 3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 35%
Juncus effusus Common
Rush
5 ft. 3-5 ft.1.0”- 2.0” plug Herb 35%
100%
Buffer Planting Zone - Shaded
Bare Root
Species Common
Name
Max
Spacing
Indiv.
Spacing
Min.
Caliper
Size
Stratum # of Stems
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Quercus
phellos
Willow Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Betula nigra River Birch 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 25%
Quercus
michauxii
Swamp
Chestnut Oak
12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20%
Carpinus
caroliniana
Ironwood 18 ft. 6-18 ft.0.25”-1.0”Shrub 5%
Viburnum
dentatum
Arrowwood
Viburnum 18 ft. 6-18 ft.0.25”-1.0”Shrub 5%
Magnolia
macrophylla
Bigleaf
Magnolia 12 ft.6-12 ft. 0.25"-1.0"
Canopy 5%
100%
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestPlanting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.2October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
REMOVE EXISTING
FENCE
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECE
CE
CE CECECE
CE CECECE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECEX
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXX XXXXXXXXBULL CREEKPLANTING ENDED AT LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE. EXISTING
FOREST TO REMAIN.
TCE TCE
TCE
TCETCETCETCETCE
TCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestPlanting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.3October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS CE-XS CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
C
E
CE
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBULL CR
E
E
K
KEY ROADPLANTING ENDED AT LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE. EXISTING
FOREST TO REMAIN.TCETCETCETCETCETCE
TCE
TCETCETCETCETCE
TCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastPlanting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.4October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
5.3
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
REMOVE
EXISTING FENCE
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2CE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXXXXXXXCE-XS CE-XS
CE-XSCE-XSCE
-
X
SXXXXX
XXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
XXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE
-
X
S
CE-XS CE-XS
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXBULL CREEKKEY ROADK
E
Y

RO
A
D
BUL
L

C
R
E
E
K
TCETCETCET
C
E
T
C
E
TCETCETCE TCETCETCETCE
TCE TCE TCE TCE
TCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastPlanting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.5October 15, 2018N
Sheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
DO NOT FENCE
EASEMENT
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2XXXXXCE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
XXXXX
XXXXXXCECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
SXXXXX
X
X
BULL C
R
E
E
K
TCETCETCETCE TCETCETCETCE
TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE TCE
TCE
TCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Planting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.6October 15, 2018NSheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
REMOVE
EXISTING FENCE
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
REMOVE
EXISTING FENCE
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2XXCE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE-XSCE-XSX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSA
F SAFUT1 TCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Planting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.7October 15, 2018NSheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
REMOVE
EXISTING FENCE
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2 CE-XSCE-XSX
X
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSC
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X XX XX
X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECEX
XXX
X
X
X
XXX
X
XXXXX
X
UT1
KEY ROAD
TCETCE TCE
TCETCE TCE TCE TCE TCETCETCE
T
C
E
TCE TCETCE
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2Planting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.8October 15, 2018NSheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2
TIE IN TO
EXISTING FENCE
CE-XS
CE-XSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSXXXXX
X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CE
CE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXXXXXUT2
KEY ROAD
BULL CREEKTCETCETC
E
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:312 W. Millbrook Rd.Suite 225Raleigh, NC 27609Tel: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:PRELIMINARYDO NOTUSE FORCONSTRUCTIONT:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 25, 2018Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT3Planting and Fencing Plan005-02165MJC/BJBDJAE5.9October 15, 2018NSheet Index
5.2
5.4
5.55.8
5.6
5.7
5.9
PROPOSED
FENCE (TYP.)
REMOVE
EXISTING
FENCE
5.3
UT1
UT3
BULL C
R
E
E
K
UT2XXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS
CE-XSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X
X
X
X XXXXXCE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
XX
XXXUT3
BULL CREEK450+00 450+57
TCE
TCE
TCE TCETCETCETCETCETCE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:005-02165MJC/BJBDJAEOctober 15, 2018T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Chunky Riffle
Not to Scale
Woody Riffle
Not to Scale
1
6.1
Native Riffle
Not to Scale
Jazz Riffle Structure
Not to Scale
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
RIFFLE BOTTOM
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
Plan View
A A'
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
B
B'
HEAD OF RIFFLE
Profile A-A'
Section B-B'
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
Section A-A'
Plan View
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
RIFFLE BOTTOM
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTIONS
A
SEE PROFILE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE
B'
B
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIFFLE A'
TOE OF SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
LOG EXPOSED 1" TO 3" ABOVE
FINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATION
Section B-B'
Plan View
Profile View
A-A'
TOE OF SLOPE
Log Section
B-B'
TOP OF BANK
F
LOWFLOWA'
B
FLOW
B'
NOTES:
·STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN
SIZE AND TYPE WITHIN EACH
RIFFLE.
·ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED
FOR LOGS AT ENGINEER'S
DISCRETION.
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT
WILL BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS.
REFER TO LOG/ROCK SILL
DETAIL.
·RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE A
WELL-GRADED MIXTURE OF
FINE GRAVELS TO LARGE
COBBLE WITH A D50 = 6 INCHES.TOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKATOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
LENGTH VARIES PER PLAN
Section A-A'
Plan View
Section B-B'
A A'
B
B'
3" MAX
3" MAX
2
6.1
4
6.13
6.1 Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
3" TO 6" BRUSHY MATERIAL
WORKED INTO ROCKY SUBSTRATE
MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER
WOODY DEBRIS
MICRO POOL HABITAT
BEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS
3" TO 6" DIAMETER WOODY
DEBRIS WORKED INTO RIFFLE
SUBSTRATE
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
TAIL OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
HEAD OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
ONSITE BOULDERS
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
ROCK VANES MAY
BE USED IN PLACE
OF LOGS AT
ENGINEER'S DISCRETION
BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)
BANKFULL
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
LOG STRUCTURE
EXPOSED UNTIL
CENTER OF CHANNEL
CR-NR CR-WR
CR-JZ CR-CH
NOTES:
·IF ONSITE LARGE STONE IS NOT
AVAILABLE FOR BOULDERS
RIFFLE SHOULD BE CHANGED
TO JAZZ RIFFLE OR OTHER PER
ENGINEER'S DIRECTION.
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT
WILL BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS.
REFER TO LOG/ROCK SILL
DETAIL.
·RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE A
WELL-GRADED MIXTURE OF
FINE GRAVELS TO LARGE
COBBLE WITH A D50 = 6 INCHES.
FLOW
6.1NOTES:
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT WILL BE SHOWN IN
THE PLANS. REFER TO LOG/ROCK SILL DETAIL.
·RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE A WELL-GRADED
MIXTURE OF FINE GRAVELS TO LARGE COBBLE THAT
MIMICS EXISTING CHANNEL SUBSTRATE.
·ALL RIFFLES WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH CLASS A
STONE. BULL CREEK REACH 2 AND UT1C WILL BE
SUPPLEMENTED WITH CLASS B STONE.
NOTES:
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT
WILL BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS.
REFER TO LOG/ROCK SILL
DETAIL.
·RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE A
WELL-GRADED MIXTURE OF
FINE GRAVELS TO LARGE
COBBLE WITH A D50 = 6 INCHES.
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20121
6.2
Rock and Roll Riffle
Not to Scale
Plan View
Profile View
A-A'
1/2 TO 2/3
BANKFULL
Log Section
B-B'
POOL
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTION
55° TO 65°
(TYP)
B'
B
0.5' MAX.
5' MIN.
(TYP)AFLOWKey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsA'005-02165MJC/BJBDJAEOctober 15, 2018THALWEG
TOP OF BANK
NORMAL WATER
SURFACE
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
TOE OF
SLOPE
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
12" DIAMETER OR
GREATER (TYP)
BANKFULL
Lunker Log
Not to Scale
Section A-A'FLOWCOVER LOG
Plan ViewTOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)A
A'
1' OVERHANG
FOOTER LOG
5' MIN.
COVER LOG
FOOTER LOG
BURIED 6" BELOW
MAX POOL DEPTH
2
6.2
Log-Rock Cascade Riffle
Not to Scale
Plan View
Profile View
A-A'
70° TO 90°
(TYP)0.6' MAX AFLOWA'
POOL
WIDTH PER
TYPICAL SECTION
8' (MIN)
RIFFLE MATERIAL
SEE SHEET 5.2 DETAIL 2
FILTER FABRIC (TYP)
3
6.2 6.2EXTEND 5'
INTO BANK
EXTEND 5'
INTO BANK
EXTEND 5'
INTO BANK
B'
B
24"
18"
8' MIN
24' MAX
Profile View
B-B'
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
SALVAGE ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
SALVAGE ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
Log J-Hook
Not to Scale
4
6.2
Θ
Plan View
Section B-B'
Section A-A'
B'
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
FILTER
FABRIC
EXTENDS 5'
MIN.
OFFSET HEADER LOG
0.25' TO 0.5' UPSTREAM
OF FOOTER LOG
X 5' OF
LOG
BURIED
IN
BANK
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
PLACE HEADER BOULDER
TO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
HEADER LOG
Vane Arm Dimensions
R1A R1B R2 R3
W (FT)1.7 2.0 1.9 3.0
H (FT)1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2
X (FT)17.7 14.5 13.4 17.6
Θ (Degree)22°25°25°25°
S (%)7.6%7.6%7.4%6.6%
Y (FT)6.6 6.1 5.7 7.4
0%
TOP OF BANK
BURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)FLOWFLOW
CR-RR
2
:
1
NOTES:
·VARY THE SEQUENCE, TYPE AND ORIENTATION OF STEPS (DROPS). USE ROCK
STEP DETAIL AS A GUIDE FOR VARIATIONS IN ORIENTATION/CONFIGURATION.
·KEY PIECES ARE LOWER MOBILITY STONE THAT PROVIDE GRADE CONTROL AND
TOE PROTECTION. USE CLASS 1 STONE OR SALVAGED ONSITE BOULDERS MIN
0.5'x1'x1.5'. JAZZ LOGS SHOULD BE WORKED IN AS EQUIVALENT OF KEY PIECES.
·ROCK STEP OR LOG STEP AT END OF CASCADE RIFFLE PAID SEPARATE.
·NUMBER OF INTERNAL STEPS (INCLUDING STEPS AT THE BEGINNING OF A
CASCADE SEQUENCE) VARIES BASED ON LENGTH AND SLOPE. RIFFLES SHALL BE
1.2 - 1.8 TIMES THE AVERAGE CHANNEL SLOPE. STEP DROPS SHALL BE BETWEEN
0.2-0.5' MEASURED AT THE WATER SURFACE.
·FOOTER ROCK OR LOG SHOWN. FOOTER ONLY REQUIRED WHEN MINIMUM
UNFOOTERED DIMENSION OF ROCK OR LOG IS NOT MET. A MINIMUM OF 16"
OF RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED OVER FILTER FABRIC TO PROTECT.
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT WILL BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS. REFER TO
LOG/ROCK SILL DETAIL.
BOULDER OR LOG STEP - LOGS 12" DIA OR GREATER,
BURY INTO BANK 2' MIN. (TYP)BANKFULL
FLOWNORMAL WATER
SURFACE
TOP OF BANK
THALWEG
FLOW
15"WELL GRADED MIX OF
IN-SITU SAND, #57, CLASS
A, B, AND #1 STONE
HABITAT LOGS/BRUSH
ROCK STEP
(OR LOG STEP PER
PLANS)
KEY PIECES
(TYP)
LOG STEP (VARY)
ROCK STEP
(VARIES PER PLAN)
BOULDER OR LOG STEP
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
(INVERT OF ROCK OR LOG STEP -
ROCK STEP SHOWN)
HEAD OF RIFFLE
ELEVATION
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
CR-LR
NOTES:
·IF A RIFFLE ENDS WITH A SILL IT WILL BE
SHOWN IN THE PLANS. REFER TO LOG/ROCK
SILL DETAIL.
·RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE A WELL-GRADED
MIXTURE OF FINE GRAVELS TO LARGE
COBBLE WITH A D50 = 6 INCHES.
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
POINT PER PROFILE
S=8% MAX
15" WELL GRADED MIX OF
IN-SITU SAND, #57, CLASS
A, B, AND #1 STONE
NOTE:
·12" MINIMUM DIAMETER COVER AND FOOTER LOG
SCOUR
POOL
TOE OF SLOPE
A'
A
TOP OF BANK
FLOW
FLOW S
NOTE:
·HEADER BOULDER MAY BE ELIMINATED AT DISCRETION OF ENGINEER.
H
W
Y
EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
B
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsLog Vane
Not to Scale
SLOPE (S)H TOE OF
SLOPE
FOOTER LOG
TOP OF BANK
Profile B - B'
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
HEADER LOG
W
SCOUR
POOLFLOW
EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
Plan View
A'
ATOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)Θ STREAMBED
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
NONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
HEADER LOG
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
Section A-A'
FOOTER LOG
STABILIZE VANE
WITH ONE BOULDER
ON EACH SIDE
X
EXTEND 5'
INTO BANK
B
B'FLOW
NOTES:
·ON SMALLER STREAMS THE
STABILIZATION BOULDER MAY BE
REMOVED PER ENGINEER'S DISCRETION.
·MEASURE FROM BANK TIE-IN ALONG
BACK OF LOG
FLOWTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)Plan View
A
A'B B'
Profile A-A'
EMBED 5'
INTO
BANK (TYP)
Rock Sill
Not to Scale
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILETOP OF BANK (TYP)SILL ELEVATION PER PROFILETOP OF BANK
5'
FILTER FABRICEXTEND FILTER
FABRIC 5' MIN.
UPSTREAM
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
A'
Profile View
Plan View
STREAMBED
RIFFLE BACKFILL
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
FLOW
SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE (TYP)
FLOW
Log Sill
Not to Scale
POOL LENGTH PER PROFILE
SILL ELEVATION PER
PROFILE
POOL DEPTH PER PROFILE
12" - 15" DIAMETER
HEADER LOG
Section A - A'
EMBED LOG
4' (MIN.)SILL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE (TYP)
12" - 15" DIAMETER LOG
CHANNEL
BOTTOM WIDTH
0° - 15° ANGLE
PER FIELD DIRECTION
BACKFILL
A
NONWOVEN FILTER FABRIC
POOL
BRUSH TOE,
OR TRANSPLANTS TO LARGER
STREAMS AS DIRECTED BY
ENGINEER
NOTE:
·FOOTER LOG TO BE ADDED IF DROP IS
MORE THAN HEADER LOG DIAMETER.
CLASS 2 HEADER STONE
6.3FOOTER STONE
12" - 15" DIAMETER
FOOTER LOG
BANK TIE IN
Section B-B'
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE/GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
Vane Arm Dimensions
R1A R3 UT1C
W (FT)1.7 3.0 1.0
H (FT)1.4 1.2 0.6
X (FT)17.7 17.6 7.2
Θ (Degree)22°25°25°
S (%)7.6%6.6%7.6%
Y (FT)6.6 7.4 3.0
Y
TIES INTO CHANNEL
Channel Plug
Not to Scale
Section A-A'
Plan View
EROSION CONTROL MAT
1 1
COMPACTED SELECT
MATERIAL
CHANNEL BACKFILL
SIDE SLOPE PER
TYPICAL SECTION PRO P O S E D C H A N N E L
A A'
BOULDER TOE
PROTECTION
FLOW ABANDONED
CHANNEL
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsθ
FLOW
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH 1' TO 2' CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS
EXCAVATE POOL
PER PROFILE
Plan View
A'
A
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section A-A'
Profile View B-B'
SLOPE (S)H TOE OF SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
STRUCTURE INVERT
ELEVATION PER PROFILE.
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
VANE ARM
LENGTH
(X)
FOOTER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
Y
2'
CLASS A/B
STONE
TOE OF SLOPENONWOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
CHANNEL BED
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
B'
B
Brush Toe - Small Streams
Not to Scale
UT1, UT2, UT3
3
6.4
FLOW
A
A'
Plan View
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P
)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E
(
T
Y
P
)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E (
T
Y
P
)
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P
)
DENSELY PACKED
WOODY DEBRIS
BRUSH MATERIAL
TO BE INSTALLED
FLUSH WITH BANK
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
Section A-A'
DENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
BACKFILL
TOE OF SLOPE
3'
NATIVE SOILELEV. 6" BELOW
POOL DEPTH
ELEV. 6" ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
NOTES:
·OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
·INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL
CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE AND
SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY
DEBRIS LAYER.
·BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND
IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
·INSTALL MATTING OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
·INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING
TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
·SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
6"6.4Rock Vane
Not to Scale
2
6.4
Brush Toe - Large Streams
Not to Scale
Bull Creek
NOTES:
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW AT TOE OF SLOPE.
DIAMETER 6"-12".
3. INSTALL BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AT INTERVALS
ALONG BANK, RESTING ON TOP OF PARALLEL BASE LOGS. BASE
LOGS SHALL BE 6"-12” DIAMETER.
4. INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL
CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE
AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT
BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
5. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL
AND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
6. INSTALL MATTING OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
7. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING
TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
8. SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND
BANK STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
Plan View
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
Section A-A'
BASE LOG
4"-6" DIAMETER
DENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
BACKFILL
DENSELY PACK BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL
IN BETWEEN BASE LOGS
BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE
2' MIN
3'
BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE
INSTALLED FLUSH
WITH BANK
FLOW
A
A'
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P
)
TOE O
F
S
L
O
P
E
(
T
Y
P
)
TOE
O
F
S
L
O
P
E
(
T
Y
P)
TOP
O
F
B
A
N
K
(
T
Y
P
)
BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW
BACKFILL
NATIVE SOIL
BASE LOG
6-12" DIAMETER
ELEV. 6" BELOW
POOL DEPTH
ELEV. 1' ABOVE
DOWNSTREAM
RIFFLE INVERT
WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
6"
1
6.4
Plan View
A'
B
B'
STREAMBED
0.4'X
Yp
Wb
YYsp
HEADER BOULDER
FOOTER BOULDER
CLASS B
RIP RAP
(TYP)
Yp
HEADER BOULDER
FOOTER BOULDER
Dsp
Dp
Step-Pool Conveyance
Not to Scale
A
Symbol Description Dimension
Y Total Length
Wt Top Width
Wb Bottom Width
Ysp Scour Pool
Length
Dsp Scour Pool
Depth
Yp Step Pool
Length 22
Dp Step Pool Depth 5
X Step Pool Drop 3
Z Step Pool Weir
Height
---Backfill Stone
Size Class B
---
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsBare Root Planting
Not to Scale
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, STRAIGHT
DOWN INTO THE SOIL
TO THE FULL DEPTH OF
THE BLADE AND PULL
BACK ON THE HANDLE
TO OPEN THE PLANTING
HOLE. (DO NOT ROCK
THE SHOVEL BACK AND
FORTH AS THIS CAUSES
SOIL IN THE PLANTING
HOLE TO BE
COMPACTED,
INHIBITING ROOT
GROWTH.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, AND PUSH THE
SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP
INTO THE PLANTING HOLE.
PULL THE SEEDLING BACK
UP TO THE CORRECT
PLANTING DEPTH (THE
ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE
1 TO 3 INCHES BELOW THE
SOIL SURFACE). GENTLY
SHAKE THE SEEDLING TO
ALLOW THE ROOTS TO
STRAIGHTEN OUT. DO
NOT TWIST OR SPIN THE
SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE
ROOTS J-ROOTED.
INSERT THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, SEVERAL
INCHES IN FRONT OF
THE SEEDLING AND
PUSH THE BLADE
HALFWAY INTO THE
SOIL. TWIST AND PUSH
THE HANDLE FORWARD
TO CLOSE THE TOP OF
THE SLIT TO HOLD THE
SEEDLING IN PLACE.
PUSH THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, DOWN TO
THE FULL DEPTH OF
THE BLADE.
PULL BACK ON THE
HANDLE TO CLOSE THE
BOTTOM OF THE
PLANTING HOLD. THEN
PUSH FORWARD TO CLOSE
THE TOP, ELIMINATING AIR
POCKETS AROUND THE
ROOT.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE, OR
SHOVEL, AND CLOSE AND
FIRM UP THE OPENING
WITH YOUR HEEL. BE
CAREFUL TO AVOID
DAMAGING THE SEEDLING.
NOTES:
1. ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER
PLANTING AREA SHALL BE
DISKED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR
TO PLANTING.
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE
PROPERLY HANDLED PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION TO INSURE
SURVIVAL.
DIBBLE BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BLADE WITH A TRIANGULAR
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL
BE 12 INCHES LONG, 4
INCHES WIDE AND 1 INCH
THICK AT CENTER.
ROOTING PRUNING
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED
TO AN APPORIATE LENGTH
TO PREVENT J-ROOTING.
RESTORED
CHANNEL
BANKFULL
BUFFER WIDTH
VARIES
SPACING PER
PLANTING PLAN Section View
6.5PANELS SHOULD ONLY BE JOINED
WHEN PERPENDICULAR TO EACH OTHER.
DO NOT JOIN PANELS AT ANGLES
SUCH AS AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE.
2
6.5
TerraCell Cross Section Joint Details
Not to Scale
NOTE:
·TERRACELL TO BE INSTALLED AT
CATTLE CROSSING BETWEEN KEE
ROAD AND BEGINNING OF BULL
CREEK REACH E. SEE SHEET 2.6.
TOP OF BANK
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
NOTES:
·SOD MATS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
·PREPARE THE BANK WHERE THE SOD MAT WILL BE TRANSPLANTED BY
RAKING & FERTILIZING.
·EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT SOD MATS WITH A WIDE BUCKET AND AS MUCH
ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE.
·PLACE TRANSPLANT ON THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED.
·SECURE WITH SOD STAPLES.
·FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT.
·ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
·PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH THAT THEY TOUCH.
Section View
Riffle Installation Plan View
Riffle Installation CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Transplanted Sod Mats
Not to Scale
FLOW
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS
3
6.5 Streambank Planting
Not to Scale
Plan View
UT1A, UT1B, UT1C, UT2, UT2A,
UT2B, UT2C, UT3, UT3A, UT3B,
UT3C
6' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
6' SPACING FOR JUNCUS PLUGS
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View
Bull Creek (Mainstem Reaches)
8' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
4' SPACING FOR JUNCUS PLUGS
4' SPACING FOR LIVE STAKES
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (SEE DETAIL)
TOE OF SLOPE
JUNCUS PLUG
AT NORMAL
BASEFLOW TOE (TYP)
BASEFLOW W.S.
NOTE:
1. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW PLANVIEW DETAILS BY REACH
SHOWN ABOVE
LINEAR SPACING
LINEAR SPACING
LIVE STAKE AT
TOP OF BANK
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Erosion Control Matting
Not to Scale
Section View
ECO-STAKE (TYP)
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP)
Plan View
ECO-STAKE (TYP)
TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
TOE OF SLOPE
TOP OF BANK
3' MAX.
SPACING
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20121
6.6
Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails8"
4"
Temporary Silt Fence
Not to Scale
NOTES:
·USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND
WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH
12" STAY SPACING.
·USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN
WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE
WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
·PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTENER
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
WIRE
TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN.
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
SHALL BE 12 12 GAGE MIN.
8' MAX. WITH WIRE
(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GROUND
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FILL
STEEL POST
2'-0" DEPTH
EXTEND FABRIC
INTO TRENCH
2
6.6
6" MIN
1.25".4"
Eco-Stake
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
INTAKE HOSE
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE INSET "B")
10' X 5' STABILIZED OUTLET
USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC.
(SEE INSET "C")
INTAKE HOSE
DEWATERING
PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSE
DEWATERING BAG
(SEE INSET "A")
SAND BAG
(24" X 12" X 6")
OR STONE.
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING
FLOW
FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM
PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
10' MIN.
STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B
RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING
GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE
FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.
FILTER FABRIC
Inset "C"
Stabilized OutletPlan View
Inset "B"
Impervious Dike
EXISTING TERRAIN DEWATERING BAG
STREAM BED
FILTER FABRIC
8" of CLASS B RIPRAP
15' to 20'
NOTE:
·PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO
STREAMBED.
10'
15'
BAG PLACED ON
AGGREGATED OR STRAW.
HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED
"J" TYPE SEAMS.
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE
IN PLACE.
FLEXIBLE
DISCHARGE HOSE
WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP
Inset "A"
Dewatering Bag
ACTIVE WORK AREA
DEWATERING
BAG
Pump Around System
Not to Scale
3
6.6 6.6NOTES:
·TOP ROW OF STAKES SHOULD
FACE AWAY FROM THE STREAM.
·BOTTOM ROW OF STAKES SHOULD
FACE TOWARDS THE STREAM.
·MIDDLE ROWS OF STAKES
SHOULD FACE UPSTREAM.
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:WATER DIVERSION CHANNEL
MUD MATS
SUPPORT LOG
12" Ø MIN.FILTER FABRIC
CLASS B
STONE
NOTES:
·CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL
BASEFLOW.
·MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS.
DO NOT EXCAVATE CHANNEL BOTTOM.
·INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.
·MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE
CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
·STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE EDGE
OF THE MUD MAT.
·CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP
ANGLE ACCORDING TO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
10
5' DIM
Temporary Stream Crossing - Mud Mat
Not to Scale
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20122
6.7
Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsSEED AND PLANT AS PER
BUFFER RESTORATION SHEET
FILL TO BE COMPACTED IN LIFTS AND
BE AND FREE OF DEBRIS AND BRUSH.
OLD CHANNEL TO
BE ABANDONED.
6' MAX. WITH WIRE
ORANGE SAFTY
FENCE
"T" OR "U" POST DRIVEN
MINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUND
ATTACH SAFETY FENCE
TO METAL POSTS USING
METAL WIRE TIES
4' MIN.
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
PHYSICAL PROPERTY TESTS REQUIREMENTS
MATERIAL N/A POLYETHYLENE
RECOMENDED COLOR N/A "INTERNATIONAL ORANGE"
TENSILE YIELD ASTM D638 AVE. 2000 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH ASTM D638 AVE. 2900 LBS. PER 4' WIDE
ELONGATION AT BREAK (%)ASTM D638 GREATER THAN 1000%
CHEMICAL RESISTANCE N/A INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
18" MIN.
Ephemeral Pool
Not to Scale
Safety Fence
Not to Scale
3
6.7
4
6.7 6.7COARSE AGGREGATE 6"MIN. 48" PIPE DIAMETER
1/2 DIAMETER OF PIPE OR 12",
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
EARTH FILL COVERED BY
APPROPRIATELY
LARGE ANGULAR ROCK.FLOWTOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKRIP-RAP COVERED BY
APPROPRIATELY LARGE
ANGULAR ROCK.COARSE AGGERGATE
MIN. 48"PIPEDIAMETER25' MIN.25' MIN.
Section View
Plan View
NOTES:
·THIS TYPE OF CROSSING CAN BE
INSTALLED IN BOTH A WET OR DRY
WEATHER STREAM CONDITION WHERE
THE DRAINAGE AREA EXCEEDS 10 ACRES.
·REMOVE DURING CLEANUP.
·CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO USE A
TEMPORARY BRIDGE CROSSING. IF
HE/SHE DOES, IT MUST CONFORM TO
THE "MANUAL FOR EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL IN [STATE]".TOE OF SLOPETemporary Stream Crossing - Culvert
Not to Scale FLOW1
6.7
LITTORAL SHELF
DEEP SHELF
36" MAX
12"
5:1
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:70'
12'PUBLIC ROADCLASS A STONE
8" MIN. DEPTH
NOTES:
·PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE
LARGE TRUCKS.
·LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS OF INGRESS
AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENT
CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
·MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC
TOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
·ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE
CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
·USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
·PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
Construction Entrance
Not to Scale
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 20121
6.8
Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetailsTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)FLOWWORK AREA
20'
20'
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THREE
CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT
DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PROJECT.FLOWTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)NO. 57 STONE
CLASS B
RIPRAP
2' MIN.
3'
NO. 57 STONE 4 INCHES
WIDE ON UPSTREAM FACE
SPILLWAY CREST
CLASS B RIPRAP
Plan View
Plan View
Section A-A'
20'20'
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
SEDIMENT WHEN DEPTH
REACHES 12".
FLOW
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam
Not to Scale
WORK
AREA
Profile View
2 3 STREAMWIDTH
3'
TOE OF SLOPE
CLASS B RIPRAP
TOP OF BANK
6"
Section B-B'
5' MIN.
FLOW
3
6.8
REMOVE ALL BRUSH AND
DEBRIS FROM INSIDE DRIPLINE.
6' WOODEN OR METAL "T" POSTS
SHALL BE USED AS STANDARD.
SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO
STANDARDS TO FORM BARRIER.
Section View
RADIUS OF TREE PROTECTIONBARRIER PER PLANS.
NOTES:
·CONTRACTOR MUST ESTABLISH TREE
PROTECTION/SAFETY FENCE AROUND THE
MAGNOLIA TREE ON UT1 APPROX. STA 201+90
BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN THE
VICINITY.
·ALL TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS SHALL BE
REMOVED PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR
DEMOBILIZATION.
·SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF ALL TREE
PROTECTION BARRIERS.
Plan View
3'
3'
Tree Protection
Not to Scale
2
6.8
6.8A
A'
B B'5' MIN.
CHANNEL BOTTOM
B
20°
0.5'
TOP SITS 0.5'
ABOVE BASEFLOW.
TOP OF BANK
NORMAL
BASEFLOW
Section B-B'
Section A-A'
NOTE:
·FOR STREAM BEDS
WITH COARSE
SUBSTRATE PROVIDE
FOOTER ROCKS.
FOOTER ROCKEMBED BOULDERS 1.0' (MIN)
BELOW CHANNEL BED
Profile View C-C'
BASE FLOW
ELEVATION
1'
1'
BACKFILL (ON-SITE NATIVE
MATERIALS OR NO. 57 STONE)
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
CHANNEL BED
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
HEADER ROCK
SEE PROFILE
0.5'
NATIVE MATERIAL AND
COURSE FILL FROM EXISTING
STREAMBED. REPLACE WITH
MAX 2:1 SLOPE.
EXISTING
ERODED BANK
B
A
A
EXISTING
ERODED BANK
FOOTER ROCK
Plan View
FLOW
FLOW SLOPE
Boulder Toe Protection
Not to Scale
3
6.9
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.9TOP OF BANK
BASEFLOW WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
FLOWTOP OF BANK
BASEFLOW WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
BURY 5' INTO
STREAM BANK
10'-12'30°
BURY 5' INTO
STREAM BED
Plan View
Elevation View
NOTE:
·LOG SHALL BE A HARDWOOD
SPECIES WITH A 12" MINIMUM
DIAMETER
TOP OF BANK
TOP OF COVER LOG AT BANK SHALL
MATCH ELEVATION AT HEAD OF NEXT
DOWNSTREAM RIFFLE BASEFLOW WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
PLACE BOULDER ON TOP
OF LOG TO STABLIZE LOG5' MIN.
5' MIN.
TOP OF BANK
Cover Log
Not to Scale
1
6.9
TOP OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP.)
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
Plan View
Pool Installation w/ Root WadsTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
NOTES:
·BANK TO BE STABILIZED THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE
THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED.
·EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT
MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS
POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE ROOT MASS CANNOT BE
EXCAVATED IN ONE BUCKET LOAD, THE TRANSPLANT IS
TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE SELECTED.
·PLACE TRANSPLANT IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED SO
THAT VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
·FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND
COMPACT.
·ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE
REMOVED.
·PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH
THAT THEY TOUCH.
Section View
Riffle Installation
Section View
Pool Installation w/ Root
Wads
Plan View
Riffle Installation
TOP OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING (TYP.)
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AND ROOTMASS
TOP OF BANKCONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Transplanted Vegetation
Not to ScaleFLOWFLOW
2
6.9
NOTES:
·ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITION OF THE LIVING
PLANT MATERIAL IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE TIME OF INSTALLATION.
·BOTTOM OF FIRST COMPACTED EARTH LIFT TO
BE PLACED 6" ABOVE NORMAL BASEFLOW.
·NUMBER OF COMPACTED EARTH LIFTS TO
VARY DEPENDING ON DESIGN TOP OF BANK
HEIGHT.
COMPACTED SOIL 12" TO 18" THICK
LIVE CUTTINGS
BIODEGRADABLE EROSION
CONTROL FABRIC (SEE INSET "A")
ROCK TOE PROTECTION
(CLASS B - VARIES PER
STREAM SIZE)
HEIGHT VARIES
INSTALL ADDITIONAL VEGETATION SUCH AS
LIVE STAKES, ROOTED SEEDLINGS, AND ETC.
18" TO 36"
2"
UPHILL
INNER LAYER 11.2 OZ. / YD²
COCONUT FIBER BLANKET
OUTER LAYER 26 OZ / YD²
COIR MATTING
Section View
Inset "A"
Matting and Blanket
Typical Stakes
OPTIONAL LIVE FASCINE
BUNDLE OR 2' COIR LOG
SECURED WITH 36" STAKES.2"
15°
Vegetated Soil Lift
Not to Scale
BASE FLOW
STREAMBED
UPHILL
36"
2"
24"
2"
Typical
Stakes
NOTE:
1. BOARD FOR STAKES SHALL BE
2" X 2" X 24" OR 2" X 2" X 36"
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
2. ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITIONS
OF THE LIVING PLANT
MATERIAL IS NOT
REPRESENTATIVE AT THE TIME
OF INSTALLATION.
TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section View
LIVE FASCINE BUNDLE OR
12" COIR LOG SECURED
WITH 36" STAKES AND WIRE
SECURE WITH 24"
LONG STAKES (TYP)
BRANCH CUTTINGS (TYP)
16 GAUGE GALVANIZED
WIRE SECURED TO STAKES
FILL IN GAPS WITH
TOP SOIL.
2' to 3'
LIVE FASCINE BUNDLE
OR 12" COIR LOG.
UPHILL
2"2"
16 GAUGE GALVANIZED
WIRE SECURED TO STAKES
SHALL BE A MINIMUM
OF 35 BRANCH CUTTINGS
PER SQUARE YARD
(1 INCH MAX. DIAMETER)
4
6.9
Brush Mattress with Coir Log
Not to Scale
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.10Detail of Gate
Post Anchor
Access Gate
Hinge Assembly
GATE POST GATE POST
2" PAINTED
TUBE STEEL GATE
GROUND LINE
4' or 16'
3' MIN
18" MIN
5"GATE POST ANCHOR
5 8"
CURVED TO FIT
DIAMETER OF FRAME
CURVED TO FIT
DIAMETER OF
BOLT HING
Hinge Clamp
(2 Required)
Bolt Hinge
(2 Required)
NOTES:
1. ALL POSTS AND BRACES MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR
SQUARE AT THE OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR,
PROVIDED THE SAME TYPE IS USED THROUGHOUT
THE PROJECT.
2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF
ROUND OR EDGE DIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS
AND BRACES.
3. ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END, CORNER OR
GATE POSTS. PLACE LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT
TO EXCEED 300' AN AT THE END OF THE BARBED
WIRE ROLL.
4. THE 300' INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE
ENGINEER ON CURVES WHERE THE DEGREE OF
CURVATURE IS GREATER THAN 3 DEGREES.
5. NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1" MINIMUM FOR
HORIZONTAL BRACES. PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d
OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d NAILS AT EACH END OF
ALL BRACES.
6. PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST. DRAW
ALL BRACE WIRE TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH
POST.
7. INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER
EXCEPT THAT ON HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER
THAN THREE DEGREES (3°) INSTALL THE FENCE TO
PULL AGAINST ALL POSTS. SEE NCDOT STD. 866.02
FOR FENCING AT DITCH CROSSINGS, BREAKS IN
GRADES AND R/W BREAKS.
8. USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
HINGE ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED.
SUBSTITUTION MAY BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY
THE ENGINEER. USED 2" PAINTED STEEL PIPE FOR
GATE FRAME EXCEPT AS SHOWN HERE.
9. ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE
MEETING THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS
ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOT LIMITED TO THE EXAMPLES
SHOWN HEREON.
USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE AT GATE
POSTS OR WHERE REQUIRED BY
SOIL CONDITIONS. CONCRETE MAY
ALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTING
POSTS TO THEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH.
316" DIAMETER STEEL CABLE
2.0' FROM TOP OF BANK MIN.
6"
CORNER POST
AND BARBED WIRE FENCE
(SEE DETAIL1, SHEET 4.8)
2.5" STEEL PIPE
3 8" STEEL CHAIN 4" MAX
4" MAX4" MAX
SEE INSET BELOW
6"
SPOT WELD 3 8" STEEL CHAINTO 2.5: STEEL PIPE
STAINLESS STEEL U-BOLT
W
H1
H2
1
6.10
Suspended Cable Fence
Not to Scale
4
6.10
2" Tube Steel Gate
Not to Scale
Corner Brace
Line Braces
FIBERGLASS OR
OTHER APPROVED
INSULATED POST
12.5 GUAGE MIN
SINGLE STRAND
GALVANIZED
STEEL WIRE OR
APPROVED
ALTERNATE.
SPACED TO MAINTAIN
WIRE HEIGHT
30-34"
SPA
C
E
D

T
O
MAI
N
T
A
I
N

W
I
R
E
HEI
G
H
T
FIBERGLASS OR
OTHER APPROVED
INSULATED POST
12.5 GUAGE MIN
SINGLE STRAND
GALVANIZED
STEEL WIRE OR
APPROVED
ALTERNATE.
NOTE:
1. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ENERGIZING, GROUNDING, AND
INSULATION REQUIREMENTS.
Temporary Cattle Exclusion Fence
NCDOT Detail No. 866.04
Not to Scale
2
6.10
Alternate Types of Staples
USE ONE #9 STAPLE OR TWO #16 STAPLES
AT EACH POINT OF ATTACHMENT.
Corner Braces
USE WHEN CORNER ANGLE IS 15° OR GREATER
End or Gate Braces
Line Braces
(MAXIMUM SPACING 330')
1 1 2"MIN XXXXXXXXXX5" x 5" WOOD BRACE POSTS
4"x4" HORIZONTAL
TOP BRACE
5 STRAND HIGH TENSIL
SEE CHART FOR STRANDS
AND SPACING
#9 WIRE
TWISTEDGROUND
8' - 0" MIN 8' - 0" MIN
H3
H2
H1 XXXXXXXXXX8' -
0
"

M
I
N 8' - 0" MIN
GROU
N
D
LINE#9 WIRE
TWISTED H3H2H14"x4" HORIZONTAL
TOP BRACE
5 STRAND HIGH TENSIL
SEE CHART FOR STRANDS
AND SPACING
5" x 5" WOOD BRACE POSTS
5" x 5" CORNER
WOOD BRACE POST
H3
H2
H1
H6
H5
H4
8' - 0" MIN12' - 0"
TYPICAL SPACING ALL LINE POSTS
4"x4" HORIZONTAL
TOP BRACE
4"x4" HORIZONTAL
LINE POST
5 STRAND HIGH TENSIL
SEE CHART FOR STRANDS
AND SPACING
5" x 5" WOOD BRACE POSTS
GROUND
#9 WIRE
TWISTED
A
B
B
B
B
C
3
6.10
Five Strand High Tensil Fence
Not to Scale
HIGH TENSIL FENCE CHART
NUMBER OF HIGH TENSIL STRANDS 5
A 2"
STRAND B 10"
SPACING C 12"
BRACE POSTS
LENGTH H1 8"
EXPOSED H2 4'-5"
EMBEDMENT H3 3'-5"
LINE POSTS
LENGTH H4 6'-6"
EXPOSED H5 4'-5"
EMBEDMENT H6 2'-0"
HORIZONTAL BRAC 8'-0"
1
6.11
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:005-02165MJC/BJBDJAEOctober 15, 2018T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.1112"
WATER DIVERSION
CHANNEL
WATER DIVERSION
CHANNEL
FILTER FABRIC
CLASS A/B STONE
NOTES:
1. FORD CROSSING SHALL BE INSTALLED
PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL BANKS.
2. MAINTAIN DIVERSION CHANNEL TO INSURE
RUNOFF DOES NOT ENTER CHANNEL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE
APPROPRIATE FORD DIMENSIONS.
Ford Crossing
Not to Scale
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.12CMP Pipe Arch Culvert Crossing - UT1A
Not to Scale
Plan View of UT1A Culvert Crossing
Typical Cross Section View at Center Of Road
(Not to Scale)
NOTE:
PERMANENT CULVERTS SHALL NOT BE USED BY
MACHINERY DURING CONSTRUCTION UNLESS A
MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER IS INSTALLED OVER
CULVERT.
OVER FLOW CHANNEL - 10'
5'12" MIN. COVER
6" MIN. BEDDING,
#57 STONE
2.0'2.0'
12"
1.6'
TOP 3" ABC STONE
50/50 MIX CLASS A AND
CLASS B RIP RAP
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL
#57 STONE
49"W x 33"T CMP ARCH PIPE.
INV. UP: 1111.05
INV. DOWN: 1110.80
EMBED CULVERT 6" AS
SHOWN ON PROFILE.
BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
INITIAL BACKFILL, PLACED IN
LIFTS OF 6"-8" ONSITE SELECT
MATERIAL
TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
Profile View of UT1A Culvert Crossing
MIN. TOP ELEVATION: 1114.00
5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER WITHIN EASEM
E
N
T
CECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
XXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XX
CECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
204
+
0
0
NCDOT CLASS A RIPRAP
1105
1110
1115
1120
1105
1110
1115
1120
203+00 203+50 204+00 204+50
STA = 203+48.01
ELEV = 1110.05 STA = 203+79.01
ELEV = 1109.78
2:1 EMBANKMENT SLOPE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.13CMP Pipe Arch Culvert Crossing - UT1C
Not to Scale
NOTE:
PERMANENT CULVERTS SHALL NOT BE USED BY
MACHINERY DURING CONSTRUCTION UNLESS A
MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER IS INSTALLED OVER
CULVERT.
ROAD ELEVATION: SEE TABLE
OVER FLOW CHANNEL - 10'
5'12" MIN. COVER
6" MIN. BEDDING,
#57 STONE
2.0'2.0'
12"
1.6'
TOP 3" ABC STONE
50/50 MIX CLASS A AND
CLASS B RIP RAP
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL
#57 STONE
57"W x 38"T CMP ARCH PIPE.
INV. IN: 1095.16
INV. OUT: 1094.85
EMBED CULVERT 6" AS
SHOWN ON PROFILE.
BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
INITIAL BACKFILL, PLACED IN
LIFTS OF 6"-8" ONSITE SELECT
MATERIAL
TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
Plan View of UT1C Culvert Crossing
Typical Cross Section View at Center Of Road
(Not to Scale)
Profile View of UT1C Culvert Crossing
MIN. TOP ELEVATION: 1101.00
5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER WITHIN EASEM
E
N
T
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
XCECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE211+00211+00NCDOT CLASS 1 RIPRAP
11
0
0
1
1
0
0
1101
1090
1095
1100
1105
1090
1095
1100
1105
210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00
STA = 210+97.00
ELEV = 1095.16
STA = 211+36.00
ELEV = 1094.85
2:1 EMBANKMENT SLOPE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.14CMP Pipe Arch Culvert Crossing - UT2
Not to Scale
NOTE:
PERMANENT CULVERTS SHALL NOT BE USED BY
MACHINERY DURING CONSTRUCTION UNLESS A
MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER IS INSTALLED OVER
CULVERT.
OVER FLOW CHANNEL - 10'
5'12" MIN. COVER
6" MIN. BEDDING,
#57 STONE
2.0'2.0'
12"
1.6'
TOP 3" ABC STONE
50/50 MIX CLASS A AND
CLASS B RIP RAP
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL
#57 STONE
42"W x 29"T CMP ARCH PIPE.
INV. IN: 1089.48
INV. OUT: 1089.22
EMBED CULVERT 6" AS
SHOWN ON PROFILE.
BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
INITIAL BACKFILL, PLACED IN
LIFTS OF 6"-8" ONSITE SELECT
MATERIAL
TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
Plan View of UT2A Culvert Crossing
Typical Cross Section View at Center Of Road
(Not to Scale)
Profile View of UT2A Culvert Crossing
MIN. TOP ELEVATION: 1094.00
5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER WITHIN EASEM
E
N
T
CECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS303+00NCDOT CLASS 1 RIP RAP
109510921085
1090
1095
1100
1085
1090
1095
1100
302+50 303+00 303+50 304+00
STA = 303+15.00
ELEV = 1089.48 STA = 303+49.00
ELEV = 1089.22
2:1 EMBANKMENT SLOPE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.15CMP Pipe Arch Culvert Crossing - UT3C
Not to Scale
NOTE:
PERMANENT CULVERTS SHALL NOT BE USED BY
MACHINERY DURING CONSTRUCTION UNLESS A
MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER IS INSTALLED OVER
CULVERT.
OVER FLOW CHANNEL - 10'
5'12" MIN. COVER
6" MIN. BEDDING,
#57 STONE
2.0'2.0'
12"
1.6'
TOP 3" ABC STONE
50/50 MIX CLASS A AND
CLASS B RIP RAP
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL
#57 STONE
49"W x 33"T CMP ARCH PIPE.
INV. IN: 1079.95
INV. OUT: 1079.68
EMBED CULVERT 6" AS
SHOWN ON PROFILE.
BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
INITIAL BACKFILL, PLACED IN
LIFTS OF 6"-8" ONSITE SELECT
MATERIAL
TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANSTIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
Plan View of UT3C Culvert Crossing
Typical Cross Section View at Center Of Road
(not to scale)
Profile View of UT3C Culvert Crossing
MIN. TOP ELEVATION: 1084.00
5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER WITHIN EASEM
E
N
T
CECECECECECECECECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
408+00NCDOT CLASS 1 RIPRAP1084
1083
1075
1080
1085
1090
1075
1080
1085
1090
407+50 408+00 408+50
STA = 407+77.00
ELEV = 1079.95 STA = 408+09.00
ELEV = 1079.68
2:1 EMBANKMENT SLOPE
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\Plans\02165-Details.dwgMarch 7, 2012Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaDetails6.16CMP Pipe Arch Culvert Crossing - Bull Creek Reach 3
Not to Scale
NOTE:
PERMANENT CULVERTS SHALL NOT BE USED BY
MACHINERY DURING CONSTRUCTION UNLESS A
MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER IS INSTALLED OVER
CULVERT.
ROAD ELEVATION: 1076.5
12" MIN. COVERTOP 3" ABC STONE
UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL
#57 STONE
DUAL CMP PIPE ARCH
36"T X 55"W
INV. IN: 1072.68
INV. OUT: 1072.42
EMBED CULVERT 6" AS
SHOWN ON PROFILE.
BACKFILL WITH 50/50 MIX
CLASS A/B RIP RAP MATERIAL
TYPE 2 WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
EXISTING GRADE
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING GRADE
PER PLANS
Plan View of Bull Creek Reach 3 Culvert Crossing
Typical Cross Section View at Center Of Road
(not to scale)
Profile View of Bull Creek Reach 3 Culvert Crossing
6" MIN. BEDDING,
#57 STONE
2.0'
1.6'
2.0'5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER WITHIN EASEMENT
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE
-XSCE
-XSCE
-
X
S
CE
-XSCE
-XSCE
-XSCE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
SX XX
X
X
X
X XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
-XSCE
-XSCE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE-X
S
CE
-
X
S
CE
-XSCE
-XSCE
-
X
S
CE
-
X
S
CE
-XS158+00
159+00
160+00
1075
1077
1065
1070
1075
1080
1065
1070
1075
1080
158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50
STA = 158+71.00
ELEV = 1072.68
STA = 159+04.00
ELEV = 1072.42
2:1 EMBANKMENT
SLOPE