20170551 Ver 2_401 Application_20170517

(3 Stantec
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
5209 Center Street
Williamsburg VA 23188
To: Mr. Anthony Scarbrough
Address: NC Department of Environmental
Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: [phone]
Date: May 19, 2017
File: 203400630
Delivery: Fed Ex Overnight
From: Rachel Roberts
❑ For Your Information
❑ For Your Approval
For Your Review
❑ As Requested
Transmittal
Reference: Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line Pre -Construction Notification,
Washington and Beaufort Counties, NC
Enclosed, please find the Buffer Determination Request Form for the Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV
Transmission Line. If at all possible, we would like to meet on-site within the next month for the
determination. Also included as a follow up to the pre -application meeting held at the Washington
Regional Office between Dominion, Stantec, state and federal agencies on October 3, 2016 is the
Pre -Construction Notification for agency review and issuance of Section 401 Water Quality
Certification as the project appears to qualify for a Nationwide Permit # 12. This submittal is a re-
submission in order to include the requested number of copies, as well as the application fee and
Soil Survey map with the project area shown. Please let me know if you have any questions or
require any additional information.
Attachment:
Copies
Doc Date
Description
5
April 21, 2017
Buffer Determination Request - Appendix F of the PCN
5
April 15, 2017
Pre -Construction Notification
1
--
Application Fee Check
Sing rely,
Rachel Roberts
Senior Regulatory Specialist
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
c. Mr. Ben Saunders, Dominion
Design with community in mind

Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV
Transmission Line
Pre -Construction Notification
(3 Stantec
Applicant:
Dominion North Carolina Power
Attn: Mr. Ben A. Saunders
701 East Cary Street, 12th Floor
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Agent:
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
5209 Center Street
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 14, 2017

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVESUMMARY..................................................................................................................................
ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................................................................... II
1.0 PROJECT DETAILS.........................................................................................................................1.1
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION.........................................................................................................................1.1
1.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED........................................................................................................1.1
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................1.1
1.3.1 Transmission Line Construction...................................................................................1.2
1.3.2 Construction Access and ROW Clearing/Maintenance.....................................1.2
1.3.3 Substation Expansion...................................................................................................1.3
2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................2.1
3.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION..............................................................................................3.1
4.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION...................................................................................................4.1
5.0
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION...............................................................................................5.1
Appendix B -
5.1
WETLAND & STREAM BUFFER DELINEATION...................................................................................5.1
- Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
5.2
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES....................................................................................5.1
Appendix E -
5.3
CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES..........................................................................................5.3
Buffer Determination Request
5.3.1 Architectural Resources..............................................................................................5.3
5.3.2 Archaeological Resources.........................................................................................5.4
5.4
100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN....................................................................................................................5.5
6.0 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................6.1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Alternatives Comparison Table....................................................................................................2.2
Table 2. Threatened and Endangered Species Database Search Results.........................................5.2
Table 3. Recommendations for Cultural Resources Within the ROW...................................................5.4
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A
- Pre -Construction Notification
Appendix B -
Project Graphics
Appendix C
- Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix D
- Threatened and Endangered Species Information
Appendix E -
Cultural and Historic Resources Phase I Survey
Appendix F -
Buffer Determination Request
(3 Stantec

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Executive Summary
Stantec has been retained by Dominion North Carolina Power (Dominion) to prepare a Pre -
Construction Notification in support of the proposed Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission
Line project located within the Counties of Beaufort and Washington, North Carolina. The
project consists of constructing a new overhead 115 kV transmission line entirely within new,
variable width right-of-way (ROW). The existing substations at either terminus are also proposed
to be expanded to accommodate the new line. The new 115 kV line would provide service to
the transmission system in the northern and eastern regions of North Carolina. Construction of the
proposed Trowbridge - Pantego Line would add capacity, reliability, and redundancy to an
area that is currently being served by the longest radial line on Dominion's transmission system.
Dominion has coordinated with the North Carolina Utility Commission, and the project is not
required to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity due to the line voltage.
The proposed line does not appear to have crossings of navigable water ways subject to
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. However, it may have crossings of
drainage/irrigation canals maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 14 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act (USC Section 408). The installation of new transmission line support
structures is expected to result in 0.04 acres of permanent impacts to wetlands for structure
foundations, but no impacts are expected as a result of expanding either substation. In addition,
because the project requires the clearing of new ROW, the project includes approximately 98.61
acres of palustrine forested wetland within the ROW which will be cleared by hand and allowed
to regenerate to the scrub/shrub wetland. Of the forested wetland areas, approximately 72.40
acres are within timberlands currently managed for pine production and another 8.05 acres are
on land previously cleared and replanted as pinelands. As ROW maintenance practices will not
result in the permanent conversion of these areas to herbaceous wetlands, there does not
appear to be a permanent loss of wetlands due to fill, excavation, flooding, or drainage, and
therefore no compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Furthermore, no impacts to threatened or endangered species, cultural or historic resources, or
the 100 -year floodplain are expected. As the project is not expected to result in the loss of more
than 0.5 acres of wetland, it appears to meet the terms and conditions under Nationwide Permit
12 from the US Army Corps of Engineers. On behalf of the applicant, Stantec is pleased to submit
the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification (Appendix A) for agency review and approval.
(3 Stantec

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Abbreviations
Corps
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Dominion
Dominion North Carolina Power
ESC
Erosion and Sediment Controls
FT
Feet
HUC
Hydrologic Unit Code
kv
Kilovolt
LF
Linear Feet
NRHP
National Register of Historic Places
NWP12
Nationwide Permit 12
PCN
Pre -Construction Notification
PEM
Palustrine Emergent
PFO
Palustrine Forested
PSS
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub
ROW
Right -of -Way
SF
Square Feet
USFWS
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
WOUS
Waters of the United States
(3 Stantec

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
PKUJECT DETAILS
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The applicant, Dominion North Carolina Power (Dominion), is proposing to construct
approximately 27 miles of new, single circuit 115 kV overhead transmission line in Beaufort and
Washington Counties, North Carolina (Figure 1, Appendix B). Construction will begin at the
Pantego Substation in Beaufort County off of Neck Road and terminate at the Trowbridge
Substation in Washington County off of Cashie Street (Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map,
Appendix B). The existing alignment crosses several major roads including U.S. Highway 64 and
State Routes 32 and 99 (Figure 1; Appendix B). The project area is located within the Tar -Pamlico
and Roanoke watersheds, Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC) 03020104 and 03010107, respectively.
The project area also appears to be within the Tar -Pamlico Nutrient Sensitive Waters Strategy
Area for stormwater management and within counties managed under the Coastal Area
Management Act.
1.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
Dominion is a public service corporation organized under the laws of North Carolina to furnish
electric service to the public within its service territory. In order to perform its legal duty to furnish
adequate and reliable electric service, Dominion must, from time to time, construct new
transmission facilities in its system. The activities proposed in this application are necessary so that
Dominion can continue to provide reliable electric service to its customers, consistent with
Dominion's own Transmission Planning Criteria.
The line provides service to the transmission system in the northern and eastern regions of North
Carolina. Construction of the proposed Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line would
add capacity, reliability, and redundancy to an area that is currently being served by the
longest radial line on Dominion's transmission system. Currently, the nearly 44 -mile transmission
line begins at Everetts Substation in Martin County and ultimately terminates at the Pantego
Substation in Beaufort County. It serves approximately 11,000 customers, which includes a
majority of Tideland Electric Membership Corporation and Edgecombe-Martin County Electric
Membership Corporation members. This line is the only source of power for the area. Providing a
direct connection from the Trowbridge to Pantego Substations will allow Dominion to create a
looped system where electricity can be fed from two directions, increasing reliability of service
during severe weather events.
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes the expansion of the existing substations at Trowbridge and
Pantego, the clearing of a newly acquired variable width right-of-way (ROW), and the
construction of support structures, conductor wire, and static lines. To maintain the anticipated
C► Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
in-service date of December 2018, Dominion is proposing to begin construction for the project in
the summer of 2017 and is estimated to take approximately one year to complete. The
installation of new structure foundations is expected to result in minor permanent impacts, as
further detailed in Section 1.3.1. The ROW will be maintained as scrub -shrub, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Nationwide Permit 12
(NWP12). As such, there are no permanent impacts associated with the conversion of forested
or scrub -shrub wetlands to herbaceous areas. No impacts are expected from expansion of the
substations.
Transmission Line Construction
The proposed transmission line will be constructed using a combination of steel H -frame, 2 -pole,
and 3 -pole support structures. Typical structure details are provided as Figure 3 in Appendix B.
The structures will range in height from 52-87 feet (FT). New H -frames will consist of two legs, each
with a separate foundation. These structures will either be directly embedded into the ground
and backfilled with stone or feature a pipe pile foundation, dependent on soil type, tension, and
angle. Pipe pile foundations will have a maximum diameter width of 6 FT, whereas the direct
embed foundation will have a maximum diameter of 2.5 FT (Figure 3; Appendix B). Each
foundation will be the minimum size necessary to provide adequate structural support and in
many cases, will be less than 6 FT in diameter.
Structures have been sited outside of jurisdictional areas to the maximum extent practicable;
however, as a total of 60 proposed towers are required to be located within or immediately
adjacent to wetlands, constructing these towers will result in permanent jurisdictional impacts for
the installation of the foundations (Figure 2; Appendix B). Using the maximum diameter of each
foundation type, permanent impacts to jurisdictional features are expected to total
approximately 0.04 acres (Figure 2; Appendix B). Of these impacts 0.007 acres will be to
palustrine emergent wetlands (PEM), 0.003 acres will be to palustrine scrub -shrub wetlands (PSS),
0.03 acres will be to palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands, and 28.3 square feet (SF) to jurisdictional
ditch. No towers are proposed to be located within stream channels.
1.3.2 Construction Access and ROW Clearing/Maintenance
Construction access for the line will generally be provided through private drives and state
roads. Timber mats and specialized low -ground pressure equipment will be used, as necessary,
to minimize disturbance and avoid impacts to wetlands for access during construction. Most
stream crossings will be avoided by accessing the proposed structure locations from either side
of the stream, as is the case with the tributary to Welch Creek, Conaby Creek, the large canal
along Railroad Bed Road, and the intercepting canal which serves as a tributary to Cuckolds
Creek. However, in areas where stream crossings are necessary within the proposed ROW,
streams will be bridged with no in -stream structures using either crane mats or temporary bridges
where possible. The proposed access routes have been located outside of wetlands and waters
of the United States (WOUS) where practicable. No impacts to WOUS are expected as a result of
construction access at this time.
C► Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 1.2

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
The variable width ROW is proposed to be 100 -FT wide in all locations except across active
silvicultural lands, where the proposed with is 200 -FT. The additional width across this area is
needed given the existing land use and potential for tall trees, known as danger trees, to strike
the line. The proposed variable width ROW will be mechanically cleared in uplands and
selectively hand -cleared in wetlands. All vegetation will be cut to ground level for construction.
At individual support structure locations, roots and stumps will need to be removed for the
installation of the foundation but otherwise no grubbing will occur along the ROW. Upon
completion of the project, the ROW will be reseeded with a native plant mix and allowed to
naturally revegetate to scrub -shrub. Within the ROW, there are approximately 98.61 acres of PFO
wetland which will be permanently maintained as scrub -shrub. Approximately 72.40 acres of
those areas are within timberlands managed for pine production (Structures 1020/37-1020/80
and 1020/84-1020/26, Sheets 5-11, Figure 2, Appendix B). An additional 8.05 acres has been
severely altered by man, as the land appears to have been cleared and replanted as pinelands
(Structures 1020/19- 1020/24, Sheet 4, Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map, Appendix B). These
properties, although containing PFO wetland, are cleared at regular intervals to create
silvicultural products such as softwood lumber, pulp, paper and packaging products and are
characterized as mineral flat regenerative pine communities.
As the project is expected to exceed one acre of disturbance and may result in a minor
increase in impervious surface due to the substation expansions, an erosion and sediment
control (ESC) plan and stormwater management plan will be prepared and submitted to the
State for approval. Appropriate ESC measures will be installed and maintained throughout the
project during all clearing and construction activities. Temporary stabilization for all soil disturbing
activities will be used until the ROW has been restored. Trees located outside of the maintained
portion of the ROW that are tall enough to potentially impact the transmission facilities,
commonly referred to as danger trees, may need to be removed. Danger trees will be cut
ground level and no grubbing will occur. The ROW will continue to be maintained on a regular
cycle to prevent interruption to electric service and provide ready access to the ROW in order to
patrol and make emergency repairs. Periodic maintenance to control woody growth will consist
of continued hand cutting, machine mowing, and select herbicide application. The ROW will be
maintained such that vegetation naturally regenerates as scrub -shrub, outside of those areas
previously maintained as herbaceous, such as agricultural fields, yards, and mowed roadside
areas.
.3.3 Substation Expansion
The substation expansion areas at both Trowbridge and Pantego are identified on the
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map in Appendix B. Activity at these two sites includes grading and
the installation of electrical infrastructure. The expansion area will be overlain with rock and
surrounded by a security fence. As there are no jurisdictional features within these areas, no
impacts to wetlands or other WOUS are expected.
® Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 1.3

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
:.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Dominion conducted a routing and siting analysis to identify the proposed route for the
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line. The overall objectives of the routing process
were to minimize impacts to existing land uses, including Plymouth Municipal Airport and Van
Swamp Game Lands; minimize impacts to environmental resources; maximize distance from
residences; minimize visibility; and avoid circuity to reduce the total length of the line. As a
product of the routing analysis, three alternative routes were identified, including Alternative A,
Alternative B, and the proposed route, Alternative C (Figure 4; Appendix B). The majority of the
study area consists of agricultural and silvicultural lands with areas of residential development to
the north at Plymouth, south at Pantego, and along major roads within the study area. With
about half of the study area being cleared agricultural lands, the major constraints within the
study area included Plymouth Municipal Airport, Van Swamp Game Lands, and large tracts of
silvicultural lands.
In the northern portion of the study area, a height restriction ordinance associated with Plymouth
Municipal Airport divided the project area into western and eastern corridors to go around the
airport. All three alternatives originate at the Trowbridge Substation and follow roughly the same
corridor, paralleling Cashie Street, an existing railroad. Alternative A and the proposed route
parallel an existing gas line along the west side of Ken Trowbridge Road that features a
perpendicular crossing of a tributary to Welch Creek while Alternative B roughly parallels the
east side of Ken Trowbridge Road where it nearly parallels the same tributary. Each of the routes
meets again and features the same crossing of US Route 64. From this point, Alternative A
continues south and west to go around the airport, whereas Alternative B and the proposed
route veer east and then south to go around the airport.
Upon crossing US Route 64, Alternative A continues south before turning west to cross Long Ridge
Road and second tributary to Welch Creek. Alternative A takes this westerly jog and then turns
to the south where it roughly parallels the west side of Long Ridge Road to avoid residential
development. As the residential development becomes more sparse and the alignment is south
of the height restriction ordinance, Alternative A turns to the east and south following existing
logging roads across timberlands and Van Swamp Game Land. Upon crossing NC Route 32, the
alignment parallels an existing agricultural canal until its intersection with Alternative B and the
proposed route. From there, all three alternatives follow roughly the same corridor to the
southeast and then south to the Pantego Substation. Of its approximately 24.2 -mile -long path,
Alternative A crosses approximately 9.4 miles of forested land, 2.7 miles of NWI forested/shrub
wetland, 3.2 miles of state owned land (Van Swamp Game Lands), and is located within 500 FT
of approximately 108 residential or commercial buildings (Table 1) .
Alternatives B and C follow similar paths for the majority of their alignment, with Alternative B
passing around Plymouth Municipal Airport further north and east than Alternative C. Once
these alternatives turn to the south, passing east of the airport, they cross silvicultural lands and
5 Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 2.1

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
diverge in their alignments again as they approach NC Route 32. Alternative B crosses NC 32
further to the north than Alternative C and then parallels NC 32 to the south where the two
alternatives rejoin in alignment. In this area, Alternative C, rather than paralleling NC 32,
continues through sylvicultural lands and crosses NC 32 in an area further from residences. At NC
32, both alternatives rejoin in alignment and parallel existing canals and roads in a southeasterly
direction until reaching the Pantego Substation. Between NC 32 and Pantego Substation,
Alternative B and the proposed route diverge and rejoin again in a few locations due to micro -
constraints. Along its approximately 23.8 -mile -long path, Alternative B crosses approximately 6.8
miles of forested land, 0.8 miles of NWI forested/shrub wetland and is located within 500 FT of
approximately 113 residential or commercial buildings (Table 1). The alignment of Alternative C
is approximately 24.0 -miles -long' and crosses approximately 7.1 miles of forested land, 1.0 miles
of NWI forested/shrub wetland and is located within 500 FT of approximately 126 residential or
commercial buildings. Neither Alternative B or C cross any state-owned land.
Table 1. Alternatives Comparison Table
Criteria
Alternative
A
Alternative
B
Alternative
C
Total Length miles
24.2
23.8
24.0
State Land Crossed miles
3.2
0
0
Road ROW Paralleled miles
0.8
12
9.6
Road ROW Crossed count
11
9
13
Railroad ROW Paralleled miles
0.5
0.2
0.4
Railroad ROW Crossed count
2
2
2
Pipeline ROW Paralleled miles
0.7
0
0.7
Pipeline ROW Crossed count
2
0
2
Agricultural Land Crossed miles
13.7
16.9
13.5
Forested Land Crossed miles
9.4
6.8
7.1
Buildings within 500 FT of ROW count
108
113
126
NWI Freshwater Forested/ Shrub Wetlands miles
2.7
0.8
1.0
NWI Freshwater Forested/ Shrub Wetlands acres
32
9.7
12.1
NWI Freshwater Emergent Wetland miles
0
0
0.1
NWI Open Water miles
0
0.3
0.3
NHD* Streams count
26
37
39
NWI Riverine miles
0
0.3
0.4
Listed or Eligible NRHP* Architectural Resources
within 1.0 mile of ROW (count)
6
7
7
Documented Archaeological Sites within ROW
count
0
0
0
NHP Federal T&E* Species count
3
2
2
NHP State T&E* Species count
5
4
4
*NRNP- National Register of Historic Places; NHD- US geological Survey Hydrography Database; ME Threatened and Endangered
1 Length at time of alternatives analysis. Final length of proposed route after easement negotiation is
approximately 24.8 miles.
5 Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 2.2

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Since there are no existing lines between the Trowbridge and Pantego Substations, any
alignment for the project would have required the acquisition of new ROW. Each of the
alternatives identified parallels existing linear infrastructure, where feasible, to minimize further
impacts to land use, and cross jurisdictional features near previously disturbed locations rather
than in new locations. Compared to Alternatives B and C, Alternative A crosses the greatest
distance of NWI forested/shrub wetland, forested land, and also requires an approximately 3.2 -
mile crossing of Van Swamp Game Lands. While Alternatives B and C are similar in many
regards, Alternative C features a perpendicular crossing of the tributary to Welch Creek
adjacent to a previously impacted area, compared to Alternative B which crosses the tributary
obliquely, nearly paralleling it, in what appears to be a previously undisturbed location.
Ultimately, Alternative C was selected as the proposed route because it best meets the overall
objectives identified in the routing process. These three alternative routes were presented at two
public workshops held by Dominion in April of 2016 as well as Board of Supervisor Meetings in
Beaufort and Washington Counties.
Lam' Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 2.3

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
3.0 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Since approval from the North Carolina Utility Commission is not required, Dominion does not
have the power of eminent domain with which to acquire ROW for the project. Upon selection
of the proposed route, Dominion worked with individual landowners to secure voluntary
easements across their property. As such, landowner willingness to provide an easement greatly
constrained the final alignment of the proposed route. Dominion has worked with landowners
over the last year to develop easement agreements which minimize environmental impacts and
impacts to existing land uses on their property. For example, the alignment across the middle
portion of the project varies significantly from what was presented at the open houses. Dominion
has worked with Weyerhaeuser Company in this area to provide an alignment across their
timberlands that minimizes impacts to their silvicultural activity but also overlap with existing
access corridors to minimize the amount or ROW clearing needed for the project and avoid
fragmenting large tracts of forested land.
Unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other WOUS have been minimized to the extent
practicable. In accordance with NWP12, construction within WOUS for the proposed project will
be limited to the minimum required area to construct support structures and string conductor
wires. Impacts to jurisdictional features are expected from placement of the structure
foundations; however, foundations will be the minimum size necessary to provide support and
will consist of individual foundations for each leg rather than a single concrete pad. Where
possible, proposed structures have been sited outside of wetlands and no structures will be
located within stream channels. Initial plans called for structures 1020/5, 1020/10, 1020/49,
1020/68 and 1020/85 to be within wetlands; however, these structures were relocated outside of
jurisdictional features to avoid impacts. Within the ROW, timber mats will be used in wetland
areas and stream channels will be bridged using timber or crane mats to further avoid and
minimize impacts.
This project is not expected to impact public water supply, any shellfish harvesting area,
spawning grounds, waterfowl habitat; nor jeopardize threatened or endangered species, of
which we are aware; nor disrupt the movement of aquatic life. Therefore, this activity will not
cause or contribute to the significant degradation of WOUS, adversely or substantially affect
human health or welfare; life stages of organisms dependent upon the aquatic ecosystem;
ecosystem diversity, productivity, or stability; nor significantly degrade recreational, aesthetic, or
economic values.
Lam' Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 3.1

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
4.0 COMPENSATORY MITI
The Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line project is expected to result in unavoidable,
permanent impacts to approximately 0.04 acres of wetland for the construction of transmission
line support structures (Figure 2, Appendix B). This permanent fill includes approximately 0.007
acres of PEM, 0.003 acres of PSS wetland, 0.03 acres of PFO wetland, and 28.27 SF of
jurisdictional ditch. In addition, because the project requires the clearing of new ROW, the
project includes approximately 98.61 acres of PFO wetland within the ROW which will be
selectively cleared by hand and allowed to regenerate to the scrub -shrub level. Of the PFO
wetland areas, approximately 72.40 acres are within silvicultural lands intensively managed for
pine production, characterized as mineral flat regenerative pine communities (Structures
1020/37-1020/80 and 1020/84-1020/26, Sheets 5-11, Figure 2, Appendix B). An additional 8.05
acres have been severely altered by man as the land appears to have been cleared and
replanted as pinelands; however, it is unknown if this is area is actively managed silvicultural land
(Structures 1020/19- 1020/24, Sheet 4, Figure 2, Appendix B). As ROW maintenance practices will
not result in the permanent conversion of these areas to herbaceous wetlands, there does not
appear to be a permanent loss of wetlands due to fill, excavation, flooding, or drainage, and
therefore no compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Lam' Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 4.1

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
a.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
5.1 WETLAND & STREAM BUFFER DELINEATION
Wetlands and other WOUS within the project area were delineated by Stantec in accordance
with the methods outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the
2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and
Gulf Coastal Plain (Version 2.0). Wetland flags were placed in the field and sequentially
numbered to provide an on-site record of the delineation. A request for a preliminary
jurisdictional determination is being submitted to the Corps as part of this Pre -Construction
Notification (PCN) and is included as Appendix C. In total, approximately 136.57 acres of
wetlands, 670 LF (0.13 acre) of stream channel, 1,078 LF (1.23 acre) of jurisdictional canal, 51,976
LF (7.56 acres) of jurisdictional ditch, and 0.26 acre of open water were identified within the
project area. These features are reflected on the Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map in Appendix B
(Figure 2).
In accordance with the conditions outlined in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive
Waters Management Strategy Regulations, the proposed project appears to be an exempt
activity under the buffer management regulations as Dominion standard practices are
compliant with the best management practices set forth in the regulations. Stantec will conduct
a buffer determination with Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh of the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources to evaluate whether or not the project is
exempt or allowable.
5.2 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Raleigh Ecological Services online project
review process was used to evaluate potential effects to federal and state listed threatened
and endangered species from the proposed project. The review process searched the following
databases: the USFWS Information, Planning and Conservation System and the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program. A species conclusion table was prepared and is enclosed in
Appendix D with the database search results; the results are summarized below in Table 2.
Based on the scope of work, no adverse effects to any threatened or endangered species are
expected from the proposed project.
5 Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.1

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Table 2. Threatened and Endangered Species Database Search Results
Species
Status
Database
Comments
Northern long-eared bat
No known hibernacula or maternity roost
(Myotis septentrionalis)
FT
USFWS
trees in Washington or Beaufort Counties.
Sensitive joint -vetch
(Aeschynomene
FT
USFWS
No habitat exists within the project area.
virginica)
Red knot
FT
USFWS
No habitat exists within the project area.
Calidris can utus rufa
Red -cockaded
Identified as having potential habitat
woodpecker (RCW)
FE
USFWS
within the vicinity of the project.
Picoides borealis
Atlantic sturgeon
FE
USFWS
(Acipenser oxyrinchus
SE
No habitat exists within the project area.
oxyrinchus )
Shortnose sturgeon
FE
USFWS
No habitat exists within the project area.
Aci enserbrevirostrum
SE
NHP
Rough -leaved loosestrife
FE
USFWS
Identified as having potential habitat
(Lysimachia
SE
NHP
within the vicinity of the project.
as erulaefolia
Red wolf
EXP
USFWS
Experimental population identified as
(Canis rufus)
SR
NHP
potentially occurring in the vicinity of the
project.
West Indian manatee
FT
USFWS
No habitat exists in project area.
Trichechus manatus
SE
NHP
American alligator
FTSA
USFWS
Identified as having potential habitat
(Alligator mississi iensis
within the vicinity of the project.
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
FE
USFWS
No habitat exists in project area.
Le idochel s kem ii
Bald eagle
No nests were identified within the vicinity
(Haliaeetus
BGEPA
USFWS
of the project.
leucocephalus)
FT: federally threatened, FE: federally endangered, ST: state threatened, SE: state endangered, SR: state significantly rare, EXP: federal
experimental population, FTSA federally threatened due to similarity of appearance with the American crocodile, BGEPA: Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act
As described in Section 1.3.3, the proposed project will avoid stream crossings where practical
and use crane mats to span stream crossings where streams cannot be avoided. No in -stream
work will be required for the proposed project. Erosion and sediment controls will be used as
appropriate throughout the project. With these measures, adverse effects to listed aquatic
species or anadromous fish use streams are not be expected.
Clearing of ROW is required for this project; however, no northern long-eared bat hibernacula or
known maternity roost trees occur within Washington or Beaufort County. This clearing is
proposed to take place without time -of -year restrictions. The Corps-Wilimington District has a
Standard Local Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance for the Northern
5 Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.2

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
Long -Eared Bat in North Carolina. The proposed project qualifies for Alternative Local Procedure
Situation 2 as the project is not located in a red HUC, there will be no blasting, and there are
other threatened and endangered species potentially within the project area. The transmission
line, after initial clearing, will be regularly maintained at the scrub -shrub level for facility
operation. Following USFWS guidance for project reviews, no maternity roost trees or hibernacula
for the northern long-eared bat were identified in the vicinity of the project according to the
letter received from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. A self -certification letter has
been prepared along with a species conclusion table relying on the findings of the final 4d rule
(Appendix D).
Sensitive joint -vetch and red knot both require tidal flat environments. Suitable habitat does not
appear to be present within the project area as the nearest tidal systems are to the northwest
along Welch Creek and south along Cuckolds Creek. The pineland within the project area is
young, and therefore, unsuitable habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker. Impacts to this
species is not expected.
Suitable habitat may exist within the project area for the red wolf. An experimental population of
the red wolf is known to occur in both Washington and Beaufort Counties; however no impacts
to this species are expected given the nature of the project. Likewise, the rough -leaved
loosestrife also has potential habitat within the project area. The loosestrife prefers scrub -shrub
wetland environments. The only existing scrub -shrub wetlands within the study area is located
within areas previously cleared and allowed to regenerate to the scrub -shrub level. As the ROW
will be maintained at the scrub -shrub level after completion of the project, no impact to this
species or its potential habitat are expected.
5.3 CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES
Stantec prepared a cultural resource assessment entitled Archaeological Identification and
Evaluation and Phase I Architectural Survey of Approximately 39.8 Kilometers (24.8 Miles)
Associated with the Trowbridge- Pon tego Transmission Line Project in Washington and Beaufort
Counties, North Carolina. Sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 describe the preliminary findings in the Phase I
analysis for architectural and archaeological resources, respectively. In summary, the survey did
not find any architectural resources within 0.5 miles of the ROW or listed, eligible, or potentially
eligible archaeological resources within the ROW. A complete hard copy of the Phase I survey
inclusive of site survey forms has been prepared for the State Office of Archaeology and State
Historic Preservation Office standards, and Stantec is prepared to submit the report on behalf of
the Corps upon its review of this PCN. A hard copy of the report is included in Appendix E.
5.3.1 Architectural Resources
A total of 37 architectural resources were surveyed, 35 in Beaufort County and 102 in
Washington County. Of the resources surveyed in each county, four in Beaufort County were
previously recorded with three previously recorded resources located in Washington County,
including the Little Richwood Development. Most were domestic in nature and comprise early to
5 Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.3

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
mid -twentieth century dwellings and associated outbuildings. Non-domestic resources surveyed
during the current survey included six commercial buildings, one church, four cemeteries, and
two transportation related resources. The survey also documented 27 resources within the Little
Richwood Development.
Although the resources surveyed are generally reflective of the mid -nineteenth to mid -twentieth
century development of Beaufort and Washington counties, the resources lack direct and/or
important associations under Criterion A, B, or C for historical significance necessary for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). As such, it is recommended that the resources
are not individually eligible for listing on the NRHP. Criterion D, typically associated with
archaeological sites, was not considered applicable in regard to the architectural survey.
5.3.2 Archaeological Resource
Stantec conducted systematic subsurface testing of the project corridor using shovel tests. Test
locations were placed between 23 meters (75.4 FT) and 30 meters (100 FT) apart along transects
spaced 15 meters (49.2 FT) apart due to the low probability of most of the survey corridor to
retain cultural deposits. In areas exhibiting 50 percent or greater ground surface visibility,
systematic pedestrian survey was employed. Pedestrian survey was supplemented with the
excavation of shovel tests at 30 -meter (100 FT) intervals, except in areas exhibiting 100 percent
surface visibility. A total of 1,882 shovel tests were excavated within the survey corridor, with
eight shovel tests positive for cultural material. A total of 1,621 shovel tests were not excavated
due primarily to the presence of canal berms, wetlands, standing water, and tree farming
disturbances. Sixteen radial shovel tests were excavated at 1 1.5 -meter (37.73 -FT) intervals to
determine the bounds of newly identified cultural resources. Three radial shovel tests were
positive for additional cultural material.
Five new isolated archaeological finds (31 BF432, 31 BF433, 31 WH64, 31 WH65, and 31 WH66) were
identified during this investigation (Table 3). None were determined eligible for listing on the
NRHP.
Table 3. Recommendations for Cultural Resources Within the ROW
Lam' Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.4
Stantec
Resource
Resource Type
Association
Recommendation
31 BF432
2 colorless bottle glass fragment & 3
19th/20th Century
Not eligible; No further work
ceramic pipe fragments
31 BF433
1 whiteware rim sherd
1 st Quarter 19th
Not eligible; No further work
Century
31 WH64
1 pearlware body sherd
Late 18thCentury
Not eligible; No further work
31 WH65
1 Iron nail fragment & 1 metal alloy
2nd Quarter 19th
Not eligible; No further work
fragment
Century
31 WH66
1 porcelain sherd & 1 whiteware rim
1 st Quarter 19th
Not eligible; No further work
sherd
Century
Lam' Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.4

TROWBRIDGE - PANTEGO 115 KV TRANSMISSION LINE
5.4 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
The limits of the 100 -year floodplain within Washington and Beaufort Counties were obtained
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and are illustrated on the Jurisdictional
Impacts Map (Appendix B). Although portions of the project are located within the 100 -year
floodplain, no adverse effects to the floodplain are expected as the project will not alter the
surface elevations or hydrologic characteristics of the area. Grading and site development
associated with the expansions of Trowbridge and Pantego Substations are not located within
the floodplain.
® Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 5.5

CONCLUSION
As proposed the Trowbridge - Pantego 1 15 kV Transmission Line project is expected to result in
permanent, unavoidable impacts to approximately 0.04 acres of wetland for the installation of
new transmission line support structures (Figure 2, Appendix B). The project also includes selective
hand clearing of approximately 98.61 acres of palustrine forested wetland within the ROW which
will be maintained as scrub -shrub wetland in accordance with the General Conditions of
NWP12. As ROW maintenance practices will not result in the permanent conversion of these
areas to herbaceous wetlands, there is no permanent loss of wetlands due to fill, excavation,
flooding, or drainage, and therefore no compensatory mitigation is proposed.
Dominion has also coordinated with the North Carolina Utility Commission and the project is not
required to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity due to the line voltage.
The proposed line does not appear to have crossings of navigable water ways subject to
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. However, it may have crossings of
drainage/irrigation canals maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 14 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act (USC Section 408). A copy of this PCN is being submitted under
separate cover to the North Carolina Department of Environmetal Quality in accordance with
the terms of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification Number GC4086 for NWP12.
® Stantec
wn u:\203400630\05_report_deliv\draft_doc\rpt_pcn_20170412.docx 6.1

APPENDIX A
PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION

a`'�F wArE�Q�
fl Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes Q No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Line
2b.
County:
Washington and Beaufort
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Plymouth and Pantego
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion North Carolina Power
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Benjamin A. Saunders
3d.
Street address:
701 East Cary Street, 12th Floor
3e.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, Virginia 23219
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jennifer Johnson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
5c.
Street address:
5209 Center Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Williamsburg, VA 23188
5e.
Telephone no.:
757-220-6869
5f.
Fax no.:
757-229-4507
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Pantego Sub: 35.58644722, -76.64777778 Trowbridge Sub: 35.85100833, -76.76777778
1 c. Property size:
376.72 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Pungo Lake, Roanoke River, Pantego Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Roanoke (HUC 0301010709), Tar -Pamlico (0302010403
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is predomininalty rural with silivicultural and farming land uses.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 136.57 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 670 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The proposed 115 kV line is required to provide more reliable power to the underserved communities in northeast North Carolina. The project will allow
Dominion to replace the longest radial transmission line in its system with a line that can be fed from two directions in the event of an outage.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the construction of an overhead 115 kV transmission line to be built within a new variable 100'-200' right-of-way. The substation
at Pantego and Trowbridge will also be expanded to support the additional line. See permit support graphics for further detail.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Submitted for approval as Appendix C
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes © No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑x Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
See attached
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.04
2h. Comments:
Proposed structure located in wetlands will be permanent impacts. No fill will be placed in the streams.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
There are no stream impacts.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
There appear to be no open water impacts.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
There will be no pond or lake construction.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑■ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
The project appears to be exempt.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The design team avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum extent possible. Where possible, proposed towers have been sited outside of
wetlands and no towers will be located within stream channels. Timbermats will be used to span streams.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
No mechanized clearing will take place in the PFO wetlands; only selective hand clearing with no grubbing. Dominion will
also strictly adhere to the measures set forth in the Erosion and Sediment Control plan, when approved.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes Q No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Unknown at this time
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
■❑ Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
While
the project does require erosion and sediment control plans, it is not located in a coastal county, does not drain to Outstanding Resource
Waters nor is it located within one mile of and draining to High Quality Resource Waters, therefore no Stormwater Management Plan is required.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
ESC plans are being developed for this project. A Stormwater Management Plan appears to be required for the substation expansion but not for the
transmission
line. All plans will be submitted for approval prior to construction.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DEQ
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Washington and Beaufort
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
0 Other: None
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑■ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ■❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑■ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
■❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
[]Yes
0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This
project will not directly result in future development by increasing the capacity and reliability of electrical supply to the service
area. All future
development would be independent of the proposed project and would be subject to all applicable water quality regulations
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No generation of wastewater is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat? Predicted by database search
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
a -
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Information, Planning and Conservation System (]PAC), NCDEQ Natural Heritage Data Explorer
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIS and Phase 1 Architectural Survey
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project involves construction of a new transmission line. The new poles will not impede the flow of water and no changes to existing contours
are required for the work.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Jennifer B. Johnson 11 �� I l 3• I i?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Ag
Page 10 of 10
s,bwature
niy if an authorization
int is provided.)
Date

2. Wetland Impacts
2a.
Wetland impact
number Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
Structure number
Structure location
(latitude)
Structure location
(longitude)
2b.
Type of
impact
2c.
Type of
wetland
(Cowardin)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404+E22,10)
or DWQ (401,
other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
2f.
Area of
impact
(square
feet
Permanent Impact 1
1020/4
35.8501579
-76.76513774
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0019
84.8
Permanent Impact 2
1020/5
35.84917249
-76.76690587
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0001
5.6
Permanent Impact 3
1020/19
35.83124064
-76.76388868
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 4
1020/20
35.82931079
-76.7641681
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 5
1020/21
35.82732608
-76.76445545
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0019
84.8
Permanent Impact 6
1020/22
35.82703108
-76.76247822
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 7
1020/23
35.82675404
-76.76062152
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 8
1020/24
35.82646758
-76.75870186
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 9
1020/25
35.82665783
-76.75708957
fill
PEM/PSS
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 10
1020/26
35.82635211
-76.75536272
fill
PEM/J. Ditch
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 11
1020/29
35.82546762
-76.75036769
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 12
1020/30
35.82520108
-76.74886268
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 13
1020/31
35.82491824
-76.74726574
fill
PSS
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 14
1020/32
35.8246259
-76.74561534
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0019
84.8
Permanent Impact 15
1020/33
35.82267677
-76.74574809
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 16
1020/34
35.8207288
-76.74588075
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 17
1020/35
35.81878068
-76.74601341
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 18
1020/36
35.81683784
-76.74614571
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 19
1020/37
35.81488692
-76.74627855
fill
PSS
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 20
1020/39
35.81097983
-76.74654457
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 21
1020/40
35.80902765
-76.74667748
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 22
1020/41
35.80705836
-76.74681154
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 23
1020/42
35.8054343
-76.74797118
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 24
1020/43
35.80376259
-76.74916479
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 25
1020/44
35.80205413
-76.75038458
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 26
1020/45
35.80037016
-76.75158681
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 27
1020/46
35.79872656
-76.75276018
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 28
1020/47
35.79699402
-76.75224488
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 29
1020/48
35.79522687
-76.7517193
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 30
1020/51
35.78985682
-76.750122331
fill
I PSS I
No
I Corps/DEQ 1
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 31
1020/52
35.78810224
-76.749600591
fill
I PSS I
No
I Corps/DEQ 1
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 32
1020/53
35.7862832
-76.749059711
fill
I PSS I
No
I Corps/DEQ 1
0.0013
1 56.5

2. Wetland Impacts
2a.
Wetland impact
number Permanent (P)
or Temporary (T)
Structure number
Structure location
(latitude)
Structure location
(longitude)
2b.
Type of
impact
2c.
Type of
wetland
(Cowardin)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404+E22,10)
or DWQ (401,
other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
2f.
Area of
impact
(square
feet
Permanent Impact 33
1020/54
35.78424632
-76.74922861
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 34
1020/55
35.78245795
-76.74937689
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 35
1020/56
35.780566
-76.74953376
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 36
1020/57
35.77862184
-76.74969494
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 37
1020/58
35.77685714
-76.74984125
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 38
1020/59
35.77503072
-76.74999266
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 39
1020/60
35.77387691
-76.7519868
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 40
1020/61
35.77272579
-76.75397618
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 41
1020/62
35.77157337
-76.7559677
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 42
1020/63
35.7704233
-76.75795502
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 43
1020/64
35.76927203
-76.75994432
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 44
1020/65
35.76807047
-76.7620204
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0019
84.8
Permanent Impact 45
1020/67
35.76473505
-76.75911036
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 46
1020/69
35.7614582
-76.75625171
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0001
5.6
Permanent Impact 47
1020/70
35.75981281
-76.75481642
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 48
1020/71
35.75911148
-76.75245041
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 49
1020/72
35.75848014
-76.75032069
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 50
1020/74
35.75714696
-76.74582397
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0019
84.8
Permanent Impact 51
1020/75
35.7558389
-76.7471476
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 52
1020/76
35.75450212
-76.74850024
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 53
1020/77
35.75328169
-76.7497351
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 54
1020/78
35.75198387
-76.75104821
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 55
1020/79
35.75075152
-76.75229502
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 56
1020/80
35.74940051
-76.75366183
fill
PEM
No
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 57
1020/84
35.74241918
-76.75271608
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 58
1020/86
35.74050849
-76.748807
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0013
56.5
Permanent Impact 59
1020/87
35.74026554
-76.74683724
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
Permanent Impact 60
1020/88
35.74003256
-76.74494854
fill
PFO
Yes
Corps/DEQ
0.0003
11.2
2g: Total wetland impacts
0.0350
1526.7

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Trowbridge -- Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
LOT NO.
PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: Transmission line extendingapproximately 25 miles through
Washington and Beaufort Counties.
Please print:
Property Owner: Virginia Electric & Power Company d/b/a Dominion North Carolina Power
Property Owner: c/o Mr. Ben Saunders
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jennifer B. Johnson of Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
701 East Cary Street, 12th Floor, Richmond, Virginia 2321.9
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized,tignature Authorized Signature
Date: 41Ll 3/ t -7 Date:

APPENDIX B
PROJECT GRAPHICS

2624667 2641071
2657475 2673879 2690283
270668]
2723092
2739496
Figure No.
-
T�ds 1�� N
- - =f` _ - - -- �� - _ "'° ' - V1, . tt i
Title
Project Location Map
- _
- r� ��S
Trowbridge
ubstation.
-r,}
�
Client/Pro' ect
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location n 2 170630
Prepared by MMJ on 20170330
Beaufort and Technic l Reuew b TPS on 2017 03-31
Washington Counties, NC y
9
Independent by JBJ on 2017-04-12
"— Gam. %"'i"
I /•
Fly ."Gips,
'I
7
s
0 10,000 20,000
Feet
`Y/lexl�' `tet -1 8rw �Ait"'t }� i
--_ it f�-- •� a
�� - - h
_ - -
r
��r„�-
f� I
•.. ;F f
1:128,400 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
- J fg
i
A Existin Substation
_
.. �..
■Project Location
f
Site Coordinates:
Pantego Substation: 35.586445 N, -76.647461 W
Trowbridge Substation: 35.850967 N, -76.768852 W
----__
_7 f - �-
ZI
L kc
-
`
FUNGo
MT
North Carolina
��
w!t DL{FE
� _ f
.•tom _
__ _ - R �
C.
o
>�
I
l�
r
Approximate
Project Location
i�
Notes
It
y j _
- -
•-
'
------1__
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Proposed Route version 20170118
3. Topographic map © USGS 30x60 Minute Quadrangle Map Plymouth 1985
pulaw-n
D
_Wilkin
_ G
Pantego
mini n
Substation ' -
�/,-
Stantec
I_
.WAIJ � --
I�
- -
_
� .L i lfw� WS, Lkn I I
, - A_- - w �v
--
11
_
2
Pa ge O1 of Ol
2624667 2641071 2657475 2673879 2690283 2706687 2723092 2739496
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato su lied in electronic format. The reci ient acce is full res onsibili} for ven in the accurac and com leteness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,fmm an and all claims ansinq in anywayfrom the content or r n of the data.

2641071 2657475 2673879 2690283
Figure No.
1-
- J N
Trowbridge Rd 1,__\ � - --- � �'•
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Uarrett Island
1 s Substation
1
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Page 3 1 ' .�
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
1 , 1
Project Location 203400630
Prop'red by MM'on2017-0320
r' -
- `7 ♦
�\ �__���� �� ``
'•
` ♦
_—___
--__ j�lle
Beaufort and
Te�h,i­lby TPS
Washington Counties, NC Independent Review by JBJ 2017-04-101
a '
94k�n r
on
Page 4`♦
` ' .
0 5,000 10,000
Feet
j" O -.. _ ___ �
1:60,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
I
�♦ ; ,� \
Legend
Page 5 � 1;�
��s Project Limits
1 Page Index
�5
Site Data
Project Area 376.72 Acres±
I.��
/
Project Length 24.79 Miles±
7
- - -� Page 6 -- - _
Palustrine Forested Wetlands (PFO) 98.61 Acres±
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetlands (PSS) 12.48 Acres±
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM) 25.48 Acres±
-
_-
Upper Perennial Stream Channels (R3) 0.11 Acres ±(585 L.F.
I ntermittent Strea m Cho n nels (R4) 0.02Acres ±(85L.F.±)
? 1
I I
Open Waters 0.26 Acres±
rJ Page 7
JurisdictionalCanal 1.23 Acres ±(1,078 L.F.±)
Jurisdictional Ditches 7.56 Acres ± (51,976 L.F. ±)
North Carolina
/ M �♦
Page �
r"
J ``♦
`♦ Page 9
Approximate
1
Project Location
r `♦
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
����
Aft . \ `
`♦
2. Preferred Route Version 201701 18
/� qq /
3. Base Map @) National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft screen shot(s) reprinted With from
product permission
\ % Page 10 /
Microsoft Corporation
i
a � !
/
I
'
Dominion
Page 12 %%♦
Van Swamp Game Lands '�
/%
�`�
Sta ntec
Page 13
2641071 2657475 2673879 2690283
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansing in any wayfrom the content or r n of the data.
Page 1 of 25

2673879
269283
2706687
Figure No.
-- —��_ Page�l!4 -- - --- - — -- -- --- - \ -
aEAUFORT
.` Page
15 . `. `
�`\
N
2
Title
y
��
Page 16 \
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
r I
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
1 g * I
1 a 1
Pa 17
``
\
Project Location 203400630
Prepa-dby MMJ on 2017-0320
Beaufort and
1
I
\\
Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Washington Counties, NC Independen} Review by JBJ on 2017-04-11
1 I
�
`
\\
0 5,000 10,000
Feet
1 1
1 \
J ,
1 I
\
1:60,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
\
I 1
1 1
1
\
\
Legend
' Page 18s
Project Limits
j_ 11 Page Index
I
I
Site Data
/ /
/ /
T
I
Project Area 376.72 Acres±
ur-
Page 19 '
Project Length 24.79 Miles±
Palustrine Forested Wetlands (PFO) 98.61 Acres±
1 /PalustrineScrub-Shrub
Wetlands (PSS) 12.48 Acres±
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands 25.48 Acres±
(PEM)
Upper PerennialStreamCho nnels(R3) O.11Acres ±(585 L.F.±)
1 1
Intermittent Stream Channels(R4) 0.02Acres ±(85L.F.±)
Open Waters 0.26 Acres±
i Page 20 , 1
stun •. ,�
Jurisdictional Canal 1.23 Acres ±(1,078 L.F.±)
V
Jurisdictional Ditches 7.S6Acres ±(51,976 L.F.±)
North Carolina
Page 21
,<` Page.22 `�
4
Approximate
1
�
Project Location
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
•. �iT7� -,-I I
t4G X
Page 23 1
2. Preferred Route Version 20170118
1
3. Base Ma O National Geographic and Orthoima e O Bing Maps
4. Microsoft from
Yr
product screen shot(s) reprinted With permission
, 1
Microsoft Corporation
-�
IF-^`J
P,Ilitegb / Pa a 24 /
r=f
Dominion`.
Pan ego,, ,
•�
r
i �, Substation
Stantec
---
Jl �'!je
,ter �
[
_ uckolds �-
deet} IRi7rtr d
Page 2 of 25
2673879 2690283 2706687
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,fmm an and all claims ansinq in anywayfrom the content or r n of the data.

Permanent Impact
1 (84.8 SF)
x-
1020/3 a �.
r ; !
♦01,
` r
1 11 2 ill Q 0.' • Permanent Impact ==
•
�2 (5.6 SF)
.. 1020 /�•�i-+ .♦
1020/1 101,
r
\ `1--Expanslon Footprint`1020/6 - '.
Trowbridge
1 i
I rr
■
s s
■
�►e 1r000_'rr
Will-
rr00, t�r.00
- -
���
►ri rr�
rte—+'*�
'rr�r i'+--1020/9
4.
rr�
► r' r
rr� r—r
r� r it
yrir0 r' r
�rrv20/12
.r
/11
r. IL V,
- - rrrr
rr' - 000
r'
rr�1020/1,F6
ftl @ 2 01020 /1' 5�
?100 r�
:000
- Al
Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Techn—I Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technology
and are for planning purposes only.
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
Mr.
:X;PlDominion®
(J� Stantec
Page 3 of 25

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
L _7
' ` -8 - �' I ... '
At
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 4 of 25

Figure No.
t
Title
- z
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Ma
p p
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
�j
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MMJ on 2017-020
Beaufort and and 3
Permanent Impact
Washington Counties, NC Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-1Technical R­iew byTPS on 02
14 (84.8 SF}
�
Permanent ImpactFeet
0 500 1,000
1020/32
.,
15 (1 1 2 SF)
I
'
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
++
�.
Legend
4
��►
Permanent Impact
® Proposed Tower Location
16 (11.2 SF)
..�
Project Limits
r
`
.w
Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
1020131
Permanent Impact
+r+.1020/34
fir` y
1
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
13 (11.2 SF)aria
r+rte
'
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
(}2D//« Permanent Impact
+_ ar + 1{ 1 `x
18 { 1 1.2 SF)
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
+•_++_
a-
*
i
Limits (R3)
•
aa_rr
Permanent Impact
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
1020/30
Permanent Impact
-
r++..
�r + 1020/36
rte+
9 (11.2 SF)
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
12 (1 1,2 SF)
Permanent Impact
17 (11.2 SF)
r+7_ +r
'-_
© Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
+r_
++�
(PFO)
a ♦ ♦
- .. e .,
++
102037,
��
++
Approximate Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
1020129 • Permanent Impact
�a 1020/38
+�
++�+.
(PSS)
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
0
11 (1 1.2
SF)
(PEM)
_+a
100-Year Flood Plain
�. 1020/39
-
Parcel Boundary
/1020/28
�\
Permanent Impact
20 (1 1.2 SF)
L.
S
Notes
o
--- -
n�
Note: Structures 1020/37 - 1020/80
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
'
-- -- -
located on sllvlcult Ural lands
have been field located by mea ns of sub-meter ca pable GPS technolog
-
and are for planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
-G
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
A
Of,
5. Microsoft Corporation
Dominion®
Plymouth Municipal Airport
Sta ntec
Page 5 of 25
1 -
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from any and all claims arising a from the content or pro msion of the data.

754592
Figure No.
Title
Art
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
t�
Submitta 1: 2017-0414
oject
C11Dominion
a,t e; r � r''G .„ ` .. * � , " ' ' , ['�, ��►
North Carolina Power
Trowbridge Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
10
Project Location 203400630
'-'-~" e•• �'�'-�
�[_ �`-. 3 sf -
'
♦♦
MMJ on 2017020
Beaufort and Prepared by 3
-
�� i. Y 'hFY� L
y
Technical Reuew b TPS on 2017 03 30
Washington Counties, NC Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
Permanent Impact
♦,
22 (56.5 SF} Permanent Impact
a'_ , i
Permanent Impact +r,
_ T�2fl/48
0 500 1,000
23 (1 1.2 SF}
Permanent Impact ` , - ' ' ' [
28 [ 1 1.2 SF}
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17) Feet
a
1020/4,1144`4
1 Q20/42
24 (11.2 SF) Permanent Impact k`j +
Permanent Impact
Legend
++++,.
25 1 1.2 $F
[ )(11.2
SF}
Proposed Tower Location
® p
++i.+�
020140+000
Project Limits
♦.
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
-
���
0 Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
++ Willow,
�w4♦
♦�
+'+
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
OPr
Permanent Impact
1020/46
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
21 (1 1 .2 SF)
Limits (R3)
Permanent Impact
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
26 (11.2 SF)
Permanent Impact
(R4)
27 (56.5 SF)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100-Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
s
t
Note: Structures 1020/37 - 1020/80
located on silvicultural lands
{
4.
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub-meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
-
-
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map@) National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
:X0,1�r.
Dominion®
Plymouth Municipal Airport
-
-._ _
_.
Sta ntec
Page 6 of 25
754592
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full res onsibili} for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising a from the content or promsion of he data.

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
+ A
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 7 of 25

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
- _ -•. �.. _ _.. s .. .. ..,�, .. ..:
.. :.. .:... ... .... ... - .. ,. ._
- - .. _. _
_
�. a. .. -__
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MMJ on 2017-0320
Beaufort
- -- -
- -
- --
.59 -
and
Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Washington Counties, NC
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
It
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
Permanent Impact
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
38 (56.5 SF)
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
•. -. _
1fl2�/59
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
•'
Permanent Impact ,,.:
Approxime Upper Perennial Stream Channel
.♦
37 (1 1.2 SF) . t
•
Limits (R3)ate
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
+ ++
0100
010,
+�++ M�'
Approximate Open Water Limits
#040
!� ��
10�/h0,y+ `-
r
a I
Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
,�
Permanent Impact
�+
.� _r _..
Approximate Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
1020/57 s � �
.- .:. _.
-...
(PSS)
+M
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
Permanent Impact
Permanent Impact
`++_
`��r
100-Year Flood Plain
��� ��
36 (11.2 SF
40 (i i .2 SF)`
►
Parcel Boundary
10
M
Permanent Impact
41
• Permanent Impact
35 (11.2 SF)
1020155
Permanent Impact
42 (1 1.2 SF)
1 a2a/,64,.M;
Permanent Impact
Permanent Impact
p
43(l SF}
v� s-
34 (11.2 SF)
{
Note: Structures 1020/37-1020/80
located on silvicultural lands
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
fD
have been field located by means of sub-meter capable GPS technolog
v
and are for planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map@) National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
:xWDominion ®
Sta ntec
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content
orpromsion of the data.
Page 8 of 25

Figure No.
2
..... - ... - - � _ � •
r 0.:-
jPermanent ImpactA..,..,
1020/62 41 [ 1 1.2 SF) t
,-w
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Match Eine ��
'- a
Submittal: 2017-04-14
- 5 _ Fe ~ M `
Client/Project
Page 8 / 9
Dominion North Carolina Power
4
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
.. 2.? -
�" ,.v � .4. - ` � - - � -" ' -_ � -- � � -� � � "� - - - - � u
Project Location 203400630
� y
Permanent Impact
p
Beaufort and Prepared by MM' on 2017-0320
echnc.IReie by TPS on 2017-03-30
Washington Counties, NC
1020/6 ,t 42 (11.2 SF)
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
•+I y+ �' E k, ;.''f
..r.: - A,
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
s'
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
----- -• - ti _- Permanent Impact - '"
Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Permanent Impact i11 r
' s Z9 i 1 1 ,2 Sr)
0 Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
1020/64 43 (1 i .2 SF} if , '.
s��.i�rt�
V
Ap p ox- ma e Jun-sd- c -onaI anaI Limits
tlt:° t �♦ ♦
i, ' ♦
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
— i i ♦♦
Permanent Impact ♦/
Limits (R3)
@ + k' ♦ ♦
v t�+ 48 [11.2 SF) ♦ 1020/72
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
0 (R4)
�jj'�
Approximate Open Water Limits
+ Permanent Impact I :.
© A pproximate Palushine Forested Wetland Limits
..- 45 (1 1.2 SFS p Permanent Impact
(PFO)
'�•.s.r; k 46 (5.6 SF) 102/71
Approximate PalustrineScrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
1020/66 .
1020/65 - 1020/67
1020/68
(PSS)
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
r �1
(PEM)
100-Year Flood Plain
Permanent Impact 1020/69 1fl2�/7Q
Parcel Boundary
44 (84.8 SF) _ Y
Permanent Impact
47 (56.5 SF)
1
Structures 1020/37-1020/80
=' s-
located on silvicultural lands
Notes
1. Coordina to System: NAD 1983 State Pla ne North Carolina Fl PS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub-meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
ti
5. Microsoft Corporation
V:'NW
Dominion®
Stantec
738Ta7
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and allclaimsonsinq in anywayfrom the content or pro msion of the data.
Page 9 of 25

0
F
mss• ..F. '°Y'cr?'!`: -!�' .k
Permanent Impact '
50 (84.8 SF)
Permanent Impact
1020/7'4 �;. 51 (11.2 SF)
Permanent Impact
;i'1020/y6 53 (11.2 SF)
=rte
•moi
4
_yak ~i4
� �ia,�:�u•.:-.arc �
4-_
Permanent Impact
54 (11.2 SF)
Note: Structures 1020/37 - 1020/80
located on silvicultural lands
Permanent Impact
57 (56.5 SF)
020/83
T
/
Permanent Impact l
/78 55 (11.2 SF) 1 1020/82 ++
Note: Structures 1020/84 - 1020/86
�+ +� located on silvicultural lands
/
102/79 4+ ��+y +
1 o2a�8o,,,,..
Permanent Impact
56 (56.5 SF)
Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MMJ on 20170320
Washington Counties, NC Techncal Reuew by TPS on 201703-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
.
1 o2ons
CJI 1141
}
}
"Permanent Impact
i1fl20/73
52 (11.2 SF)
1
} .
}
}
}
1
F ,
}
` Permanent Impact
1o2of�2 (11.2 SF)
.49
} C
Permanent Impact
.
48 (11.2 SF)
}
Q
I}
}
}
Permanent Impact
47 (56.5 SFJ
Permanent Impact
;i'1020/y6 53 (11.2 SF)
=rte
•moi
4
_yak ~i4
� �ia,�:�u•.:-.arc �
4-_
Permanent Impact
54 (11.2 SF)
Note: Structures 1020/37 - 1020/80
located on silvicultural lands
Permanent Impact
57 (56.5 SF)
020/83
T
/
Permanent Impact l
/78 55 (11.2 SF) 1 1020/82 ++
Note: Structures 1020/84 - 1020/86
�+ +� located on silvicultural lands
/
102/79 4+ ��+y +
1 o2a�8o,,,,..
Permanent Impact
56 (56.5 SF)
Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MMJ on 20170320
Washington Counties, NC Techncal Reuew by TPS on 201703-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
Notes
1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
Mr.
:X;PlDominion®
Sta ntec
Page 10 of 25
.
CJI 1141
Notes
1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
Mr.
:X;PlDominion®
Sta ntec
Page 10 of 25

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
L _7
' ` -8 - �' I ... '
At
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 1 1 of 25

2673879
Figure No.
•
a*1
Fih
.. _ -
2
Title
~r
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
i
k
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
I
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MM'on 2017-0320
Beaufort
Y
and
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
i
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
1
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
R
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
:.
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
a
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
© Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
i_
(PFO)
1 a2(�}/92
102/93
1020y94
1020/9.5 a 1fl20/96 - °r
Y
° ' 1fl2fl/97 �'
_
"1020/98 1020/99
1"02Or/Ai0Q
Approximate Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
e
®"r
�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�........
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
•
(PEM)
4,j 100 -Year Flood Plain
x
� Parcel Boundary
�
_
T
it##i i
b
I
I
FIS
J
N
Q3
G
Notes
1.Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
Q
f
I
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
�►
ro it
have been field located b means of sub -meter capable GPS technolo
Y P 9
`
and are for planning purposes only.
'
1
■
■
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
-
��
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
([1
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
V
5. Microsoft Corporation
l�r.
X Dominion®
I
Stantec
12 of 25
26A879Page
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic formai. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansing in any wayfrom the content or r n of the data.

Figure No.
2
_
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MM'on 2017-0320
Bea
ufor[ and
Washington Coun}ie s, INC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Ik
Legend
j
® Proposed Tower Location
i— j Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
— - — ---
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
1020/108
© (PFO)
-1020/100
s •_ '° `£" `
020'/101" 1020/102i°" T�. 020/103:,..
°
_.1020/104 .mss��+r.�- r.a
> r
++i�
.+
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
—1
.
20 ..
'
+�� �..
1020/I J/ ..
PSS
(PSS)
+�
+
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
u
d
{ , o—
Notes
p
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
f
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
I
and are for planning purposes only.
'
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
`
5. Microsoft Corporation
:XWDominion)
r..
IL ML
Stantec
Page 13 of 25
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and com pleteness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, em ployees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansing in any wayfrom the content or prn of the data.

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 14 of 25

721783 2690283
Figure No.
2
!
Title
I g
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
I
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
I
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
l
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepaon 2 170320
yf
Technical Reriow bby
PS on 2017-03-30
Washington Counties, NC Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
I Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
' I
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
4
Approximate Open Water Limits
��� ( -
Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
©
1020/116 , _ S�`�. - --. ,. - o2an 23
�"-'1020 % 122-- �. + +
(PFO)
a..�-- _. MW++ +� +.
1020/ 121
>r �+-� 1fl2DI12D++�+'
a
7: 1020/119
Approximate Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
' -x'^1020/118 rrr.r+ r r+r.+r�r+�rr�r+�+. r�r. �rr�■
�+��+r�r+�wT
®.rrr.rr�..�r.�+.
Approximate Palushine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
/
1020/1 1 7 Jrl
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
Y
V
I
UQ
-M
n
1
I
1 �
0.
'•i
Notes
} � �
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
a 'J/
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
i a
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
,I
and are for planning purposes only.
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
:XWDominion"
-
Stantec
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifyinq the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising a from the content or promsion of he data.
Page 15 of 25

Figure No.
2
-...,
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
_
Submitto 1: 20170414
'
Client/Project
'^•
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
J
Project LOCOYIOn Pre30
db MMJ ono20177-0320
Beaufort and Pare y
_
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
✓�
I Feet
�` i •"
1:6,000 (At original document size of 1 1x17)
+�.
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
,
., ti_ + I•� 'Y .. �t��FF`�l ST7li �'fi.�aY��:7��.�..�1����'. �► iR�U.�1M•�b �•l�-�""}4s• .� - - .rte ..
020/123 i020/i24 1020/125,=_1020/}26 --'1020/1128 '"'-- "1020/129
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS Yechnolog
and are for planning purposes only.
•O '�
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
`O
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corpora tion
CL
r7-1-
Dominion
_ 1
•
Stantec
Page 16 of 25
26902a
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content or r n of the data.

Figure No.
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
-
\<
/ V
/
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MMJ on 2017-0320
Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-0
\ j
Washington Counties, NC
Independent Reiew by JBJ on 2017-044 12-12
iI
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
Proposed Tower Location
�.
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
1020%132+�4�
��7�!
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
A r - mat l' " ,
lr�;++10/133
(R4)
°' ♦~+�
+�++
'+�+;i`
Approximate Open Water Limits
♦
++1.020/134
+` /
© Approximate Palushine Forested Wetland Limits
+x`41020/ 135 �
(PFO)
♦ ♦
♦
+ ++
�+4
Approximate Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
•�� 1020/136
v
PSS
(PSS)
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
♦4102[}/13'1
s
� .
�
� 100 -Year Flood Plain
�'
Parcel Boundary
♦
41,
♦�;+_
i•
1020/137© `+�.+�++
i
++�4
41020/13'+.�
Eq /020/130
+
l++�44� ..._
ft..++
*'
ti
Y
\
Notes
w,'djtC
-
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina Fl PS 3200 Feet
`•�
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
Ei
c
JIM
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
%J
`� •7
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
^
U
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
-.
yV.�
ter.
�r�
5. Microsoft Corpora tion
\
F
1
XW Dominion®
�F
Sta ntec
Page 17 of 25
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient acce is full responsibility for verifying the accurac and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content orpromsion of the data.

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
L _7
' ` -8 - �' I ... '
At
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 18 of 25

No.
_ :VFigure
\; 4.•
2
Title
`►'
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
_.
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
- -
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MM'on 2017-0320
Beaufort
'
and
Washington Counties, NC Technical Reiby TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
e L
• -.
0 500 1.000
Feet
/J `I
1:6,000 (At original document size of 1 1x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
i
!
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
' ,
0 Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
/
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
�..
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
1020 /152
© Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
1020/150 r+�rr�r+r�rr�rr�rr�++�♦♦� - ----------~
♦
(PFO)
r+�+-�♦
.r�••�r. �.�� ♦ ♦
A roximote Polustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
PP
(PSS)
++�rrr�rr�r+�rrrrr�+rte-+�+r�rrr�++-r�.r�rreaedrl�,>`♦♦♦'"
`♦ `♦
rr�+r~--� ++�-+~--�-- - , - - _ lfl2fl/154
1020/149
'`♦
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
1020/ 41 & `--
(PEM)
1020/1�r a.
��rr�rr
100-Year Flood Plain
- - 1020/15
Parcel Boundary
� fl
(D '
N ■
1(D\
A_
i
Notes
00 ;� \
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Pla ne North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
•�',F,�
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub-meter capable GPS technolog
for
_
and are planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layerdata provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
and
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
'\
5. Microsoft Corporation
Z
'� Dominion®
i
Sta ntec
26902P
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for ,enfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,fmm an and all claims ansinq in anywayfrom the content orpromsion of the data.
age 19 of 25

Figure No.
Z
'•\ -.
elm \
Title
v,
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
z
\ •\
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
\ \t
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
\ \
Project Location 203400630
Prepred
red by MM' on 2017-0320
7Rr \ \
'\
s
\ \ ;
Beaufort and
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TP30
SBJ on 2017-0
Independent Reuiew by Jon 2017-044 12-12
0 500 1,000
\\ \\ 1
\
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
Proposed Tower Location
i
\
Project Limits
•� `\ \\\/// 't�0`7� -
® Selective Hand Clearing Forested Wetlands
of
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
�:
1020/163*
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
♦ ©�
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
+. ♦
�++1020/154 '
1.020/155 ''�" `♦
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
0 (R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
+�4+ ++_++
♦ ♦
4
1`24/a ♦0 ♦
Approximate Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
1020/158
/020/162
-1~ ++! ++ +� - ,.-+ ♦
f+++ �� �► +� ' ,
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
�'� ++� �•���+_� 0 +�++ ♦
100 -Year Flood Plain
�1a 020/157��. 1020/159 +1020/160
+�
Parcel Boundary
1 {: ff11
lig w:
4
r-`
Notes
1. Coordina to System: NAD 1983 State Pla ne North Carolina FI PS 3200 Feet
2. The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map @) National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
-
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
7 '
5. Microsoft Corporation
:;Pftminion®
s
Stantec
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and allclaimsonsinq in anywayfrom the content or prn of the data.
Page 20 of 25

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MM'on 2017-0320
Beaufort
and
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Q1
t~ N i
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
p !
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
N
0)
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
i
Limits (R3)
4
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
1020/165 1020/d 67• 1020/169
Approximate Polustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
PSS
.�..�..�..�.. .. rr ..�..�. .� rrrrrr r•r �..�..�. .�.. �. .. �..rrr r1l
�rr�rr�r. err �r .r■
r rr�rr1020/
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
�4v��r-
3 020P20/1,66-1020/1 � gr�rr�rr�rr�rr�rr�r. 10201170
(PEM)
100-Year Flood Plain
4 *�
Parcel Boundary
oil .101
.-r'Ii�, y�� .• i-.:. _ z_ _ ,s'.•iP.^r_.. .r .. 1 •. +y��
4'
Y .:
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
`- "�•_
36 '► ' """" ' w> `�"
30b . -ice+• - " ,.
have been field located by means of sub-meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
+
3. National Flood Hazard Layer data provided by FEMA Augu st 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corpora tion
:X;PlDominion®
Stantec
_ - - - -
Page 21 of 25
68e975
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansinq in any wayfrom the content or promsion of the data.

688975
Figure No.
ake' •!. 1"
Title
0 `
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
- ,
Submitto 1: 2017-04-14
Client/ProjectT.
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MMJ on 2017-03 20
Beaufort
-
I
and
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
1 �
0 500 1,000
-- .-I
1
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
1020/1.76 `_
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
++�
1,020/175 000 + �♦ ` <
♦` ♦♦
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
R4
(R4)
�++
r
+ 0 ♦♦ //
+♦ l
Sill,♦�
Approximate Open Water Limits
Approximate Palustrine Forested Wetland Limits
_- 1020/++ +�+
♦♦ ♦`/
©
+� s+�
+� ♦ 1020�11�77 �' //
+� `♦♦ ♦• �:
(PFO)
Approximate Palushine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
i�+�
,;
10201173 woo.w=++�+`` �::.- �� ♦, e
(PSS)
++ k ♦ '
Sill
Approximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
;`♦♦
'' `♦
100 -Year Flood Plain
+_++� ++f+
�++� +�+' _ �. ' ♦ !'
�♦ io2on�8
Parcel Boundary
10-a/ �1 +�+ ++� 1020/172 _ .- .
++ ].020/1-70 - . I `♦� ♦♦
41
i
� M
s S1�
�1 N
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits the U.S., including this
►Y;'
#3
of waters of wetlands, shown on map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolog
and are for planning purposes only.
1 r _
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft screen shot(s) reprinted with from
- l
�
product permission
5. Microsoft Corporation
:XWDominion"
_
-
Sta ntec
Page 22 of 25
6 75
Disclaimer: Sto n}ec assumes no res ponsibili for data s upto lied in electronic format. The re cip ient ac ce pts full resto onsib ility for venfying verifyingthe acc ura cy and com le }en ess ofthe da}a. The re ci ienf releases Stan tec, its officers, em p loye es, co nsulto nts and a gents, from any and a 1 claims a rising in any wayfrom the content or pro msion of the data.

Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submittal: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re\A— by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper Perennial Stream Channel
Limits (R3)
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
(R4)
Approximate Open Water Limits
©Approximate Polustrine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
Approximate Polustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland Limits
(PSS)
Approximate Polustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
(PEM)
100 -Year Flood Plain
Parcel Boundary
L _7
' ` -8 - �' I ... '
At
Ti —
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by means of sub -meter capable GPS technolc
and are for planning purposes only.
3.Noticnal Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corporation
5x�tftminion"
Sta ntec
Page 23 of 25

Figure No.
�V
2
la r '
Title
'
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
4 S,L S -
ti' .. , .: <,::
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
.,,+• F-�
t.
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Bea ufor[ and Prepared by MMJ on 20170320
Technical Revew byTPS on 20170330
Washington Counties, NC
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-12
0 500 1,000
'
�
Feet
1:6,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Proposed Tower Location
Project Limits
® Selective Hand Clearing of Forested Wetlands
A
0 Approximate Jurisdictional Ditch Limits
I
Approximate Jurisdictional Canal Limits
Approximate Upper PerennialStream Channel
+020/190_
*4
Limits (R3)
++
41P
Approximate Intermittent Stream Channel Limits
++ '` ♦
♦` �♦
(R4)
++' '++
f ♦ ♦ ►.
+00­0 10 040+ ♦ 41144, 1%. 41,
f ++�� ♦i ` i �
►+ ++I 1020/9 89♦e ♦
Approximate Open Water Limits
© Approximate Palushine Forested Wetland Limits
(PFO)
�+0 � 1020/1 9 �S, ♦♦ �. "
+-
Approximate Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Limits
•` I ♦ / -.
' '0- .00`+♦
(PSS)
ximate Palustrine Emergent Wetland Limits
+ �I-1020/188 9020/192
� +�
il�k''+ �i` •f
/2/02.5+
�Appro
(PEM)
100-Year Flood Plain
'♦ 'Jr,♦♦♦
♦+++ ! �♦R
Parcel Boundary
I���020/187 ( r 102011.93. t "
IR+'++ �
+�+ Expansion Footprint .9
'. •..:�
I 102094 � �
-
+��® +��+
,•�^
++ 1020/186 e- + 1025/1 � _4 •` r •. �i
4
1 Pantego Substation
i
14
A % .4
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2.The limits of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, shown on this map
have been field located by GPS technolog
means of sub-meter capable
and are for planning purposes only.
I J L
3.National Flood Hazard Layerdato provided by FEMA August 2015
Base Map © National Geographic and Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
I
4. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
5. Microsoft Corpora tion
k�
W„w
Dominion
Sta ntec
Page 24 of 25
Disclaimer: Sto ntec assumes no res ponsibili for data s upto lied in electronic format. The re cip ient ac ce pts full resto onsib ility for verifying the acc ura cy and cam p Ie fen ess of the data. The re ci ienf releases Stan tec, its officers, em p Io a es, co nsulto nts and a cents, from any and a1 claims a rising in any wayfrom the content or pro \Asian of the data.

Selective Hand Clearing
PFO
Wetlands
(Acres)
Non -Silt' icultural Lands
26.2
Silv icultural Lands
72.4
Total
98.6
Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge-Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Bea
for[
Counties, s, NC Technical Re\A- by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-17
Site Data
Project Area
376.72 Acres ±
Project Length
24.79 Miles±
Palustrine Forested Wetlands (PFO)
Permanent Structure Impacts Table
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetlands (PSS)
12.48 Acres±
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM)
25.48 Acres±
UpperPerennialStreamCho nnels(R3)
Impact Number
Map Sheet #
PEM
Wetlands
PFO
Wetlands
PSS
Wetlands
Jurisdictional Impact
Ditch Area (SF)
Impact Number
Map
Sheet #
PEM
Wetlands
PFO
Wetlands
PSS
Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Ditch
Impact
Area (SF)
Permanent Impact 1
3
84.8
84.8
Permanent Impact 31
7
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 2
3
5.6
5.6
Permanent Impact 32
7
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 3
4
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 33
7
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 4
4
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 34
7
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 5
4
84.8
84.8
Permanent Impact 35
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 6
4
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 36
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 7
4
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 37
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 8
4
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 38
8
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 9
4
28.3
28.3
56.5
Permanent Impact 39
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 10
4
28.3
28.3 56.5
Permanent Impact 40
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 11
4
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 41
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 12
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 42
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 13
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 43
8
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 14
5
84.8
84.8
Permanent Impact 44
9
84.8
84.8
Permanent Impact 15
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 45
9
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 16
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 46
9
5.6
5.6
Permanent Impact 17
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 47
9
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 18
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 48
9
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 19
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 49
9
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 20
5
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 50
10
84.8
84.8
Permanent Impact 21
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 51
10
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 22
6
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 52
10
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 23
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 53
10
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 24
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 54
10
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 25
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 55
10
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 26
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 56
10
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 27
6
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 57
10
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 28
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 58
11
56.5
56.5
Permanent Impact 29
6
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 59
11
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 30
7
11.2
11.2
Permanent Impact 60
11
11.2
11.2
TOTAL (SF)
298.5
1070.4
129.5
28.3
1526.7
Figure No.
2
Title
Jurisdictional Area Impacts Map
Submitto I: 2017-04-14
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge-Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MM'
on 2017-0320
Bea
for[
Counties, s, NC Technical Re\A- by TPS on 2017-03-30
Independent Review by JBJ on 2017-04-17
Site Data
Project Area
376.72 Acres ±
Project Length
24.79 Miles±
Palustrine Forested Wetlands (PFO)
98.61 Acres±
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetlands (PSS)
12.48 Acres±
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM)
25.48 Acres±
UpperPerennialStreamCho nnels(R3)
0.11 Acres ±(585 L.F.±)
Intermittent Stream Channels (R4)
0.02Acres ±(85L.F.±)
Open Waters
0.26 Acres±
Jurisdictional Canal
1.23 Acres± (1,078 L.F.±)
Jurisdictional Ditches
7.56 Acres± (51,976 L.F.±)
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
r
1 'Dominion' D m0
ini n'
Stantec
Page 25 of 25

w
cn
U
W
cn
z
C7
0
CONCRETE BACKFILL
LEVELING BOLTS;
SEE FAB. DWG. 98.600
TOP VIEW
.01
PILE T
REVEAL = 8"
44.0Q
EXISTING GRADE
-11 - 7li 71177-1117
oo-
it N
w3
wow
J J �
O w
CL M u
NATIVE SOIL -
I
I
I
I
12 SIDED POLE
PIPE PILE: SEE FAB. DWG 98.600
Maximum diameter approximately 72 inches
I SLOPE I
CONCRETE
NOTE 5
o /
nn"A POLE
N
J w
ow z
z
o a N
/ U M
.I-V,-
ELEVATION
�n■m®n®n®n�n���n���
COMPACTED VDOT NO. 21A STONE
OR NCDOT ABC STONE
6" COMPACTED
VOOT NO. 21A STONE OR
NCDOT ABC STONE
PIPE PILE: SEE
FAB. DWG. 98.600
B/M REQUIRED FOR ONE
OTY. ITEM STOCK
NO. NO.
1 37.01 53711000
2 1 44.00 1578230001
GENERAL NOTES:
ASSEMBLY PAGE
DESCRIPTION
#4 SOLID COPPER
CONN., TRF. GROUND
1. FOUNDATION TO BE BUILT 1N ACCORDANCE WITH COMPANY SPECIFICATION TE VEP -2960 FOR
FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION.
2. ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3500 PSI AT 28 DAYS.
3.A 6 INCH LAYER OF COMPACTED STONE SHALL BE PROVIDED UNDER THE POLE TO ENSURE THAT THE
POLE 1S BEARING ON A FIRM AND LEVEL SURFACE. THE POLE 1S TO BE ORIENTED INSIDE THE PIPE
PILE AND PLUMBED UTILIZING THE LEVELING BOLTS.
4. SPECIFIED BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED 1N 4 INCH LIFTS. COMPACTION
SHALL BE ACHIEVED USING MECHANICAL OR PNUMATIC TAMPERS.A MINIMUM OF THREE PASSES SHALL BE
MADE OVER EACH LAYER. ADDITIONAL PASSES ARE TO BE MADE IF DISPLACEMENT OF THE BACKFILL IS
STILL EVIDENT ON THE THIRD PASS.ROD EXTENSIONS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE TAMPER.AS REOUIRED.
IN ORDER FOR THE OPERATOR TO MAINTAIN DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE UNIT AT ALL TIMES.
5. THE CONCRETE CAP SHALL CONSIST OF NON -SHRINK CONCRETE, SLOPED AS SHOWN, FOR DRAINAGE. WET
CURE AS INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATION.
Transmission Construction
DOM POLE INSTALLATION DETAILS
DIRECT EMBEDMENT IN PIPE PILE
T/L 54 UPRATE
I% Dominion
\1 701 E. Cary Street
i Dominion, , Richmond, VA 23219
ORIGINAL REVISION DRAWING NO.
DRAWN CNH
CHECKED X -XXX -X -XXX
APPROVED
DATE I ICAD NO.

NATIVE SOIL COMPACTED
NATIVE SOIL COMPACTED
& SLOPED
& SLOPED
FOR DRAINAGE
FOR DRAINAGE
w si is
z
w
z0
0 U)
-j
0
Ln
w W
0.
U 0 0
_j
M cr z 0.
LLI
W
0 LL,
W
I-- — W w
0 r%l Ln Wz
Zw 0
I--
C3
U I--
z 0
0 0
cn 0
LLJ .. C3
C3
>
:3
- -:: -,f
U 0
0
OD Cr z 0
0
w w
A
0 Ln
0
U 0
Z 0
C30
>
Lf) P% C3
L0
0
C3 0
U C3
Z >
2!
to
v
A 2!
W
36'
36'
POLE INSTALLATION: DRY HOLE
POLE INSTALLATION: WET HOLE
MINOR WATER REMOVED AND THE EXCAVATION CAN BE
WATER LEVEL IN THE EXCAVATION
MAINTAINED DRY DURING THE PLACEMENT
CANNOT BE MAINTAINED AT THE
OF BACKFILL
BOTTOM OF THE HOLE DURING
THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL
DIM. 'A' = 10% POLE HT + 2'
COMPACTION PROCEDURES FOR BOTTOM OF HOLE AND ANNULUS:
1. SPECIFIED BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN 4 INCH LIFTS.
2. EACH LAYER IS TO BE COMPACTED AND INTERLOCKED WITH THE SIDES OF THE EXCAVATION
USING MECHANICAL OR PNUEMATIC TAMPERS. A MINIMUM OF 3 PASSES SHALL BE MADE OVER
EACH LAYER. ADDITIONAL PASSES ARE TO BE MADE IF DISPLACEMENT OF THE BACKFILL IS
STILL EVIDENT ON THE THIRD PASS.
3. ROD EXTENSIONS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE TAMPER.AS REOUIRED,IN ORDER FOR THE
OPERATOR TO MAINTAIN DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE UNIT AT ALL TIMES.
V - WATER LEVEL
NCDOT NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VDOT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DOM STEEL POLE INSTALLATION DETAILS
Transmission Construction
DIRECT EMBEDDED W/ ENGR BACKFILL
Dominion
DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED DATE
I DRAWING NO.
ORIGINAL JPAKCH I DLC 105/20/141
701 E. Cary Street
90.035
REVISION I I I
ICAD NO. 90.035
Richmond, VA 23219

2624667 2641071 2657475
- -, 2690283
2706687
2723092 2739496
Figure No.
4
TROWBRIDGE --
-/SUBSTATION _
�` _ cs N1 -
'!<<— T'
Title
- ��+..
- _�/ -.,s `_
-,
Project Alternatives
'�` "'
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
r
�' �. _�-�
.i
i
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
-
S
f
Project Location 203400330
Prepared by MMJ on 2017-03 30
Beaufort and
Technical Reuew by TPS on 2017-04-11
Washington Counties, NC
Independent Reiew by JBJ on 2017-04-11
0 10,000 20,000
Feet
- --'t \• 1 -
{ I
_ ,I . I
--_-r.�-^_
I
- -
1:124,200 (At original document size of 11x1 7)
Legend
Existing Substation
Alternative C - v20160413
Alternative B - v20160413
Alternative A - v20160401
NC State Game Lands
Site Coordinates:
_ _ }!
----Y"� ��
f
Start: 35.85100833 N, -76.76777778 W
Terminus: 35.58644722 N, W
.
11
_ __
-76.64777778
. rte-
� �
C�
a. by �a
� •
~� � 1 -
' 'f
cow
PUNGO al•T. I'll AL
North Carolina
wiLDLIFE
_7__
o
+�
Y�r
----
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. World Topographic Map © ESRI
( j
I
On -
_
J�
D: rno! swornp'-
g�
-
c
Dominion
i-
- r
PANTEGO
-
I �' I .
SUBSTATION �
_- �►
Stantec
_
I
Pa ge O1 of Ol
2624667 2641071 2657475 2673879 2690283 2706687 2723092 2739496
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient acce }s full res onsibili} for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansing in any wayfrom the content or pro sion of the data.

APPENDIX C
REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
(Included as separate document)

APPENDIX D
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
INFORMATION

7- '°Fr^ United States Department of the Interior FIli5 WL6➢LIEE
f`.a 58RVLC8
L
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
6 Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
cF' 5$ 551 PYLON DRIVE, SUITE F °`
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0209 January 17, 2017
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-00508
Project Name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of
the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can
be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed
list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the
proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on
federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless
an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete
record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified
personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related
articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eaglc_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
http://www. fws. gov/migratorvbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National
Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems
you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
Attachment
2

WENT Q`Tyf�&IIl sYIil1LIP8
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Official Species List
Provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
POST OFFICE BOX 33726
RALEIGH, NC 27636
[phone]
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2017-SLI-0209
Event Code: 04EN2000-2017-E-00508
Project Type: TRANSMISSION LINE
Project Name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Project Description: Dominion Virginia Power transmission line
Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it
may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code
matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the'Provided by'
section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 01/17/2017 08:43 AM

WENT Q`Tyf�&IIl sYIil1LIP8
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Project Location Map:
i
lo. Rnrch,';f r � Plymouth �. tb
t'AI'4�1: Rouge
}
� f
i t-
PatYgrow I
Stas* Fork
Lahr
I
ran,va 4
-4.04r— KAtilI�NGTk11�1
01 -
Noglon
2.64
4�
Belhaven
Project Coordinates: The coordinates are too numerous to display here.
Project Counties: Beaufort, NC I Washington, NC
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 01/17/2017 08:43 AM
2

WENT Q`Tyf�&IIl sYIil1LIP8
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Endangered Species Act Species List
There are a total of 11 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in
an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain
fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the
Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your
project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS
office if you have questions.
Birds
Status
Has Critical Habitat
Condition(s)
Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)
Threatened
Population: Wherever found
Red -Cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
Endangered
borealis)
Population: Wherever found
Fishes
Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser
Endangered
oxyrinchus oxyrinchus)
Population: Carolina DPS
Shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser
Endangered
brevirostrum)
Population: Wherever found
Flowering Plants
rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia
Endangered
asperulaefolia)
Population: Wherever found
sensitive joint -vetch (Aeschynomene
Threatened
virginica)
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 01/17/2017 08:43 AM
3

WENT Q`Tyf�&IIl sYIil1LIP8
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Population: Wherever found
Mammals
Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis
Threatened
septentrionalis)
Population: Wherever found
Red wolf (Canis rufus)
Experimental
Population: U.S.A. (portions of NC and TN)
Population, Non -
Essential
West Indian Manatee (Trichechus
Endangered
Final designated
manatus)
Population: Wherever found
Reptiles
American alligator (Alligator
Similarity of
mississippiensis)
Appearance
Population: Wherever found
(Threatened)
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
Endangered
(Lepidochelys kempii)
Population: Wherever found
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 01/17/2017 08:43 AM

WENT Q`Tyf�&IIl sYIil1LIP8
United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Trowbridge - Pantego Routing & Siting Study - North Carolina
Critical habitats that lie within your project area
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 01/17/2017 08:43 AM

ENT OF n811A ics..cE
N -= o United States Department of the Interior
0
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
CH 3.18 r,
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
3/31/2017
Date:
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Trowbridge-Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
V"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.httnl.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleigh(a&,fws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Trowbridge-Pantego
Date: 03/31/2017
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Determination
Notes / Documentation
northern long-eared bat
Species present
May affect
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final
4(d) Rule on the Northern Long -Eared Bat
Federally threatened
and Activities Excepted from Take
Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
Source: USWS IPAC
section 7 responsibilities.
sensitive joint -vetch (SJV)
No habitat present
No effect
SJV is known to thrive in unaltered tidal
(Aeschynomene virginica)
marsh environments, and has been known
to occasionally occur in Beaufort County,
Federally threatened
NC. Since the proposed project lies within
agricultural and commercial settings, there
Source: USWS IPAC
does not appear to be a suitable habitat
near the project area. (Source:
NatureServe).

red knot
No habitat present
No effect
Red Knot is a migratory bird species of long
(Calidris canutus rufa)
distances, with nesting areas in mid -high
arctic latitudes and wintering as far as
Federally threatened
southern South America. They are known
to feed off horseshoe crab eggs in the
Source: USWS IPAC
Delaware Bay during migration and stop on
undisturbed, sandy beaches and tidal flats
between long flights. Given this information,
there does not appear to be a suitable
habitat near the project area (Source:
NatureServe).
red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW)
Potential habitat present
May affect, not likely to
Historically, RCW thrived in open longleaf
(Picoides borealis)
and no current survey
adversely affect
pine ecosystems along the coast. Today,
conducted
many southern pine forests are young and
Federally endangered
an absence of fire has created a dense
pine/hardwood forest (Source: USFWS).
Source: USWS IPAC
Habitat is unlikely as it is not a fire -
maintained system containing young
loblolly pine.
Atlantic sturgeon
No habitat present
No effect
Observed habitats consist of near shore
(Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus)
marine, bay/sound, lagoon, river mouths
and tidal river. Big rivers with low gradient,
and medium rivers with moderate gradient
Federally endangered
(Source: NatureServe). No in -stream work
State endangered
is proposed and as such, impacts to this
species are not anticipated.
Source: USWS IPAC, NC NHP
shortnose sturgeon
No habitat present
No effect
Shortnose sturgeons inhabit rivers,
(Acipenser brevirostrum)
estuaries, and the seas; and are usually
more abundant in estuaries. They
Federally endangered
reportedly prefer deep pools with soft
State endangered
substrates and vegetated bottoms, but
individuals vary in preference for various
Source: USWS IPAC, NC NHP
depths and substrate types (Source:
NatureServe). No in -stream work is
proposed and as such, impacts to this

species are not anticipated.
rough -leaved loosestrife
Potential habitat present
May affect
Rough -leaf loosestrife occurs most often in
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
and no current survey
ecotones between longleaf pine uplands
conducted
and pond pine pocosins in moist, sand or
Federally endangered
peaty soils with low vegetation that allows
for abundant sunlight to the herb layer.
Source: USWS IPAC
Additional habitat is palustrine, scrub -shrub
wetland. Known to occur in Beaufort
County (Source: NatureServe. As such,
surveys may be required and the survey
window is mid-May to mid-September.
red wolf
No habitat present
May affect, not likely to
Occurrence in Beaufort and Washington
(Canis rufus)
adversely affect
Counties. Suitable habitat for this generalist
includes upland and lowland forests,
Experimental population, non-
shrublands, and coastal prairies and
essential
marshes; areas with heavy vegetative
State significantly rare
cover. Young are born in a den in a hollow
log, in a burrow, or in similar secluded sites
Source: USWS IPAC, NC NHP
(Source: NatureServe). As such, surveys
may be required to identify if this species is
present within the vicinity of the project.
west Indian manatee
No habitat present
May affect, not likely to
Known to occur in Beaufort County. Habitat
(Trichechus manatus)
adversely affect
includes shallow coastal waters, estuaries,
bays, rivers, and lakes; manatees appear
Federally endangered
to prefer rivers and estuaries over marine
State endangered
habitats. Manatees are not averse to
traveling though dredged canals or using
Source: USWS IPAC, NC NHP
quiet marinas (Source: NatureServe). No
in -stream work is proposed.

American alligator
(Alligator mississippiensis)
Federally threatened
Source: USWS IPAC
Potential habitat present
and no current survey
conducted
May affect
Known to occur in Washington and
Beaufort Counties. American alligators
inhabit fresh and brackish marshes, ponds,
lakes, rivers, swamps, bayous, canals, and
large spring runs. They like to burrow in soil
and use fallen log/debris to bask on
(Source: NatureServe). No in -stream work
is proposed and as such, impacts to this
species are not anticipated.
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat of adults primarily includes shallow
(Lepidochelys kempii)
coastal and estuarine waters, often over
sandy or muddy bottoms where crab
Federally endangered
numbers are numerous. Most stay in the
Gulf of Mexico and they are rare along the
Atlantic coast of the northeastern United
Source: USWS IPAC
States. Females nest simultaneously on
beaches and eggs can take between 45-58
days to hatch. During this time, eggs and
hatchlings are highly susceptible to
environmental stressors including predation
on eggs and excess lighting near beaches
which can draw hatchlings towards land
instead of the ocean (Source:
NatureServe). Although the project area is
near coastal estuarine environments, no
work will occur on a beach nor will in -
stream work occur and as such, impacts to
this species are not anticipated.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Source: USWS Critical Habitat
Mapper

Bald Eagle
No known bald eagle nests
Unlikely to disturb nesting bald
Per the North Carolina Natural Heritage
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
eagles
Program database results, no bald eagle
nests are located within a one -mile radius
Federal Species of Concern
of the project area.
Source: USWS IPAC
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Signature /Title Date

Natural and
Cultural Resources
February 13, 2017
Nicole Wisniewski
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
5209 Center St
Williamsburg, VA 23188
RE: Trowbridge - Pantego
Dear Nicole Wisniewski:
ROY COOPER
SUSI H. HAMILTON
NCNHDE-2946
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Matthew Hebb at matthew.hebb&ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Nothing Compares
StffmuFNorth Carolina I oepartmentuFNatural and Cultural Resources I Natural Heritage Program
12114_ Jones Street I Raleigh, NC 27506
1551 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27599-1561
www_nonhpuorg 1943747-9167

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Trowbridge - Pantego
February 13, 2017
NCNHDE-2946
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database
does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Easement NC Department of Agriculture, Division of Soil State
and Water Conservation
Van Swamp Game Land DNP NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
Van Swamp Game Land NC Wildlife Resources Commission State
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on February 13, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Community Forest (Cypress -Gum
Subtype)
Page 3 of 5
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Trowbridge - Pantego
February 13, 2017
NCNHDE-2946
Element Occurrences Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Butterfly
34487
Neonympha helicta
Helicta Satyr
1980 -Pre
H
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Rare
Butterfly
34501
Neonympha helicta
Helicta Satyr
1980 -Pre
H
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
32039
Coryphaeschna ingens
Regal Darner
2004 -Pre
H?
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33736
Somatochlora georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004 -Pre
H?
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33762
Somatochlora georgiana
Coppery Emerald
2004 -Pre
H?
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater
8894
Leptodea ochracea
Tidewater Mucket
2000-08-09
E
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G3G4
S2
Bivalve
Freshwater
10524
Ligumia nasuta
Eastern Pondmussel
2000-08-09
E
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G4
S2
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish
24083
Acipenser brevirostrum
Shortnose Sturgeon
1980 -Pre
H?
5 -Very
Endangered
Endangered
G3
S1
Low
Freshwater Fish
32417
Acipenser oxyrinchus
Atlantic Sturgeon
2012-04-04
E
4 -Low
Endangered
Endangered
G3
S2
Freshwater Fish
32384
Enneacanthus obesus
Banded Sunfish
2004-11-03
E
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare
Mammal
23092
Canis rufus
Red Wolf
2006
C?
5 -Very
EXP
Significantly
G1Q
S1
Low
Rare
Mammal
23091
Canis rufus
Red Wolf
2006
BC
5 -Very
EXP
Significantly
G1Q
S1
Low
Rare
Mammal
5451
Trichechus manatus
West Indian Manatee
1994-09-17
E
5 -Very
Endangered
Endangered
G2
S1N
Low
Natural
7326
Brownwater Bottomland
---
2012
C
2 -High
---
---
G3G4
S3
Community
Hardwoods (Swamp
Transition Subtype)
Natural
9310
Nonriverine Swamp
---
2010
BC
4 -Low
---
---
G2G3
S2
Community Forest (Cypress -Gum
Subtype)
Page 3 of 5

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Global
State
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name
Common Name Last
Element Accuracy Federal
Group
Observation
Occurrence Status
---
Date
Rank
Special
Natural 3151 Pond Pine Woodland
--- 2012
B
2 -High ---
Community (Typic Subtype)
Threatened
G5
S1
Natural 15490 Tidal Swamp
--- 2012
BC
2 -High ---
Community (Cypress --Gum Subtype)
Reptile 13841 Nerodia sipedon
Carolina Watersnake 1992
E
5 -Very ---
williamengelsi
Low
Vascular Plant 9671 Platanthera nivea
Snowy Orchid 1935-06-25
H
4 -Low ---
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name 196
1IFftepresentational Rating
Collective Rating
Roanoke River Delta--Conaby Creek
R1 (Exceptional)
C3 (High)
ROA/Lower Roanoke River Aquatic Habitat
n/a (Not Applicable)
C4 (Moderate)
Van Swamp
R3 (High)
C4 (Moderate)
Pantego Swamp and Pocosins
R2 (Very High)
C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Owner Type
Roanoke River Preserve
The Nature Conservancy
Private
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Easement NC Department of Agriculture, Division
of Soil
State
and Water Conservation
Van Swamp Game Land DNP
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
State
Van Swamp Game Land
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
State
North Carolina Swine Buyout Easement
NC Department of Agriculture, Division
of Soil
State
and Water Conservation
State
Global
State
Status
Rank
Rank
---
G3
S3
---
G3G4
S4
Special
G5T3
S3
Concern
Threatened
G5
S1
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on February 13, 2017; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2017. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-2946: Trowbridge - Pantego
0
® n
N -
WE F
m
S -
It
:.
February 13, 2017
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E) NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 5 of 5
1:203,866
0 1.75 3.5 7 mi
0 2.75 5.5 11 km
Sources' Fsri, HERE, DeLorms, Intermap, increment P Corp_, GFBCO,, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey, Fsri Japan,
METI, Es" China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community

Home - Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS]
Details Basemap
About Content Legend+ Edenton
Legend_ -\Yz
"i ra
Final Linear Features } — r•
_ ly f '
~� 1
Y
Final Polygon Features rc r�ri
r Ro��r{{o-'lm Riv�a1 ';F f I'I•'I ti,Q
1 1TJationalmouth tls,-&4E
.Nilliaml lQII,W'ildl'rfe Ra Fuge
—7Proposed Linear Features
Pettigrew
J State Park
f Phrlps
Lakr
Proposed Polygon Features
Approximate project limits do not
ti
intersect with critical habitat
lei
\.�s so rt
ashington -
�g ��tiJMt Belhaven
f r i
.7 t j }34 ft �a•any
Wildlife
alk
ti
{� 1 — {
1 _ ♦ T.i I ---�.
Esri.com . HelpTerms of Use . PrivacyContact Esri . Contact Us . Report 0 5 10 i j
Abuse til

Naw,e owe
EXPLORER.
IRat urn To Search Resul
latureerve
Chang* Criladai Naw Search
<< Previous I Next >> View Glossary
Lepidochelys kempii - (Garman, 1880)
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle
Other English Common Names: Atlantic Ridley, Atlantic Ridley's Sea Turtle, Kemp's Ridley
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s): Lepidochelys kempii (Garman, 1880) (TSN 551770)
French Common Names: tortue de Kemp, tortue de Ridley
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100121
Element Code: ARAAA04010
Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Turtles
oo le -
Search for Images on Google
Kingdom
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Animalia
Craniata
Chelonia
Cryptodeira
Cheloniidae
Lepidochelys
Genus Size: B - Very small genus (2-5 species)
Check this box to expand all report sections:
.jfere.
Concept Reference: King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic
and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
Concept Reference Code: B89KIN01NAUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Lepidochelys kempii
Taxonomic Comments: MtDNA data indicate that L. kempii is phylogenetically distinct from L. olivacea (Bowen et al. 1991).
Conservation Status
NatureServe Status
C
C
Global Status: G1
Global Status Last Reviewed: 25Feb2014
Global Status Last Changed: 210ct1996
Rounded Global Status: G1 - Critically Imperiled
Reasons: Range centered in Gulf of Mexico-, only one major nesting area, along Gulf Coast of Tamaulipas, Mexico-, population
includes 7,000-8,000 adult females and is increasing-, major threats include degradation of beach and coastal marine/estuarine habitats
and mortality in commercial fisheries, vulnerable to oil spills.
Nation: United States
National Status: N1N (050ctl996)
U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
United
Alabama (S1), Connecticut (SNA), Delaware (SNA), Florida (S1), Georgia (S1), Louisiana (S1B,S3N), Maine (SNR), Maryland
States
(SIN), Massachusetts (SIN), Mississippi (SIN), New Hampshire (SNR), New Jersey (S1), New York (SIN), North Carolina
(S1B,SUN), Rhode Island (SNR), Texas (S3), Virginia (SIN)
Other Statuses

U.S. Endangered Species Act (USESA): LE: Listed endangered (02Dec1970)
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Lead Region: R2 - Southwest
IUCN Red List Category: CR - Critically endangered
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species Protection Status (CITES): Appendix I
NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors
Range Extent Comments: Adults essentially are restricted to the Gulf of Mexico. Immatures inhabit the Gulf and also the U.S.
Atlantic coast north to Long Island Sound (Morreale et al. 1992), New England, and Nova Scotia. Occasional individuals reach
Bermuda, the Azores, and European waters (see USFWS 1992, 1998). Important foraging areas include Campeche Bay, Mexico, and
Louisiana coastal waters (Ogren 1992). Cold -stunned juveniles frequently appear in late fall/early winter on beaches on northern Long
Island, New York (e.g., see Burke et al. 1991, Morreale et al. 1992). Live ridleys occur in Chesapeake Bay mainly from May through
November (Mitchell 1991).
There is a single major nesting beach, at Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico; 60 percent of nesting occurs along a 40 -kilometer
stretch of beach there (NMFS and USFWS 2007). In 2006, eggs were deposited in several hundred nests near Tampico, Mexico, and
in about 100 nests in Texas (NMFS and USFWS 2007). Sporadic nesting has occurred as far north as North Carolina and south to
Colombia (Palmatier 1993).
Area of Occupancy: 26-2,500 4 -km2 grid cells
Area of Occupancy Comments: Coded area of occupancy is based on nesting areas, which encompass probably not more than a
few hundred square kilometers, most nesting occurs in an area of less than 100 square kilometers (based on the 2 km x 2 km grid
system).
Number of Occurrences: 1 - 5
Number of Occurrences Comments: Despite occurrence of this species throughout the Gulf of Mexico and in much of the northern
Atlantic, there remains only a single important nesting area.
Population Size: 10,000 - 100,000 individuals
Population Size Comments: Total number of nests for all beaches in Mexico in 2006 was estimated at 12,143, with another 100 in
the United States (mainly Texas) (NMFS and USFWS 2007). This equates to more than 4,000 females. Given a nesting interval of
about 2 years or a little less, the total number of adult females in 2006 was approximately 7,000-8,000.
In 2007, more than 4,000 females nested during a 3 -day period at Rancho Nuevo
Number of Occurrences with Good Viability/Integrity: Very few (1-3)
Overall Threat Impact: Very high - high
Overall Threat Impact Comments: A major decline occurred with heavy harvest of eggs (and adults) prior to the mid-1960s, but now
all main nesting areas have good protection. Present significant threats: beach and coastal development in areas away from the main
nesting beach; various forms of coastal marine habitat degradation (e.g., bottom trawling and dredging of inshore and nearshore
areas); mortality in shrimp nets and other fishing gear (this threat has been reduced to some degree through improved regulations);
boat collisions, oil spills and exposure to other contaminants, and entanglement in and ingestion of marine debris (especially plastics)
(Thompson 1990; CSTC 1990; USFWS 1992, 1998; NMFS and USFWS 2007). Threats to the main nesting beach in Mexico are
presently few, but other areas in Mexico where nesting occurs are experiencing continued human population growth and increasing
development pressure (USFWS 1992, 1998). Concentration of nesting in one area makes the species vulnerable to detrimental
impacts of severe storms. The species' tendency to congregate in large numbers at breeding times increases vulnerability to
disturbance. Climate change is a potential threats (could alter sex ratios, sea level rise and increased storm frequency could reduce
nesting habitat).
Short-term Trend: Decline of >70%
Short-term Trend Comments: Annual number of nests at Rancho Nuevo increased significantly after the 1980s, from fewer than
1,000 to more than 4,000 by 2002 and 7,866 in 2006 (see NMFS and USFWS 2007).
Despite the recent increase, the trend over the past three generations (75 years, assuming average age of nesting female is 25 years)
is a major decline (probably declined more than 90 percent).

Long-term Trend: Decline of >90%
Long-term Trend Comments: Number of nesting females declined from possibly more than 42,000 in a single arribada in the 1940s
to only around 234 (740 nests) by the mid-1980s to 7,000-8,000 in 2006 (NMFS and USFWS 2007). However, the 1940s population
may have been an order of magnitude smaller (see NMFS and USFWS 2007).
Intrinsic Vulnerability: Highly vulnerable
Environmental Specificity: Very narrow to narrow.
Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information
Inventory Needs: Nesting areas are well known (but need continued monitoring). Better information is need on important
developmental habitats.
Protection Needs: This species is in need of continued protective fishing regulations (e.g., use of Turtle Excluder Devices, restriction
of tow times, fishing closures) in the Gulf of Mexico and southeastern U.S. Atlantic coast. Increased protection of Rancho Nuevo
beach should be funded. Strict standards and limitations on any potentially polluting activity, including disposal of plastics at sea,
should be insituted. Lagoonal/estuarine feeding habitats need protection. Sronger limitations on outer continental shelf drilling and oil
tanker design and traffic should be imposed. Designated critical habitat should be expanded.
See recovery plan (USFWS 1992, 1998).
Global Range: Adults essentially are restricted to the Gulf of Mexico. Immatures inhabit the Gulf and also the U.S. Atlantic coast
north to Long Island Sound (Morreale et al. 1992), New England, and Nova Scotia. Occasional individuals reach Bermuda, the Azores,
and European waters (see USFWS 1992, 1998). Important foraging areas include Campeche Bay, Mexico, and Louisiana coastal
waters (Ogren 1992). Cold -stunned juveniles frequently appear in late fall/early winter on beaches on northern Long Island, New York
(e.g., see Burke et al. 1991, Morreale et al. 1992). Live ridleys occur in Chesapeake Bay mainly from May through November (Mitchell
1991).
There is a single major nesting beach, at Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico; 60 percent of nesting occurs along a 40 -kilometer
stretch of beach there (NMFS and USFWS 2007). In 2006, eggs were deposited in several hundred nests near Tampico, Mexico, and
in about 100 nests in Texas (NMFS and USFWS 2007). Sporadic nesting has occurred as far north as North Carolina and south to
Colombia (Palmatier 1993).
U.S. States and Canadian Provinces

Endemism: occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
United States JAL, CT, DE, FL, GA, LA, MA, MD, ME, MS, NC, NH, NJ, NY, RI, TX, VA
Range Map
No map available.
State/Province
Conservation
Status
New Haven (09009), New London (09011)
■ SX:
Presumed
GA
Extirpated
SH:
Possibly
NC
Extirpated
_I
St:
Critically
Brazoria (48039), Calhoun (48057), Kenedy (48261), Matagorda (48321), Nueces (48355), Willacy (48489)
Imperiled
—�I
—�I S2:
Imperiled
F-1 S3:
Vulnerable
S4:
Apparently
Secure
■ S5: Secure
Not
91 RankedlUnder
Review (SNR/S U)
Conservation
Status
Not Applicable (SNA)
INI Exotic
Hybrid without
Conservation
Value
U.S. Distribution by County
State County Name (FIPS Code)
CT
New Haven (09009), New London (09011)
FL
Franklin (12037), Palm Beach (12099), Pinellas (12103), St. Lucie (12111)
GA
Camden (13039)*, Chatham (13051), Glynn (13127)*
MS
lHarrison (28047), Jackson (28059)
NC
Brunswick (37019), Carteret (37031), Currituck (37053), Dare (37055), Hyde (37095), New Hanover (37129),
Pamlico (37137), Pender(37141)
NJ
Ocean (34029), Salem (34033)
TX
Brazoria (48039), Calhoun (48057), Kenedy (48261), Matagorda (48321), Nueces (48355), Willacy (48489)
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
U.S. Distribution by Watershed
Watershed
Region Watershed Name (Watershed Code)
01 IThames (01100003

02
Long Island Sound (02030203)+, Delaware Bay (02040204)+, Cohansey-Maurice (02040206)+, Mullica-
Toms (02040301)+
03
Albemarle (03010205)+, Pamlico Sound (03020105)+, Lower Neuse (03020204)+, White Oak
River (03020301)+, New River (03020302)+, Lower Cape Fear (03030005)+, Coastal Carolina (03040208)+,
Ogeechee Coastal (03060204)+, Cumberland-St. Simons (03070203)+*, Florida Southeast
Coast (03090206)+, Crystal-Pithlachascotee (03100207)+, Lower Ochlockonee (03120003)+,
New (03130013)+, Pascagoula (03170006)+, Mississippi Coastal (03170009)+
12
Sabine Lake (12040201)+, East Galveston Bay (12040202)+, Austin-Oyster (12040205)+, East Matagorda
Bay (12090402)+, West Matagorda Bay (12100402)+, East San Antonio Bay (12100403)+, South Corpus
Christi Bay (12110202)+, Central Laguna Madre (12110207)+, South Laguna Madre (12110208)+
+ Natural heritage record(s) exist for this watershed
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
Ecology _ His --.y
Basic Description: A small marine turtle.
C
General Description: This is a sea turtle with an almost circular carapace, olive green (adults) or gray (young) above, yellow below, 5
costals on each side of carapace, the first one touching the nuchal; usually 4 enlarged scutes on bridge, with a single pore at the
posterior edge of each scute, usually there is an interanal scute at the posterior tip of the plastron; beak is somewhat parrotlike; young
have 3 tuberculate dorsal ridges, four plastral ridges; limbs are flattened flippers; adult carapace length usually 58-70 cm (to 75 cm),
mass 36-45 kg (to 50 kg); 3.8-4.4 cm at hatching (Conant and Collins 1991).
Diagnostic Characteristics: This species differs from the loggerhead in smaller size, lack of a reddish -brown dorsum, presence of an
interanal scute, and presence of pored scutes on the bridge. It differs from the hawksbill and green turtles in having the first costal in
contact with the nuchal. It differs from the Pacific ridley in having usually five costals on each side of the carapace rather than usually
six or more.
Reproduction Comments: Individual adult females lay usually 3 clutches averaging about 95-100 eggs at intervals of 10-28 days,
during daylight from April to July. Individual females nest at intervals of 1-4 years (most often 2 years). Large numbers of females may
nest simultaneously on one beach. Eggs hatch in 45-58 days (see NMFS and USFWS 2007). Available information indicates that
females begin nesting at an estimated age of 10-17 years (see NMFS and USFWS 2007). As is true of all sea turtles, this species has
temperature -dependent sex determination.
Ecology Comments: Predation on eggs (especially by coyote), hatchlings, and nesting adults sometimes has resulted in high
mortality rates. Human predation on eggs and nesting adults formerly was an important mortality source; presently, drowning of adults
in commercial fishing gear is more important. Egg survivorship (to hatching) was 0.59 in one study (see Iverson 1991).
Non -Migrant: N
Locally Migrant: N
Long Distance Migrant: Y
Mobility and Migration Comments: Most individuals move north or south from the major nesting beach at Rancho Nuevo and then
settle in resident feeding areas for several months or more in various coastal locations in the Gulf of Mexico (see NMFS and USFWS
2007). An unknown percentage of the population migrates migrates up to thousands of kilometers between nesting beaches and
Atlantic coastal feeding areas as far north as Long Island Sound, New York (Morreale et al. 1992; Morreale and Standora, no date),
and beyond.
Marine Habitat(s): Near shore, Pelagic
Estuarine Habitat(s): Bay/sound, Tidal flat/shore
Terrestrial Habitat(s): Sand/dune
Special Habitat Factors: Benthic, Burrowing in or using soil
Habitat Comments: Habitat of adults primarily includes shallow coastal and estuarine waters, often over sandy or muddy bottoms
where crab are numerous. Most adults stay in the Gulf of Mexico, and they are rare along the Atlantic coast of the northeastern United
States. Apparently most activity is benthic. Post-hatchlings spend 1-4 years as surface pelagic drifters in weedlines of offshore
currents in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean, then shift to benthic coastal habitats of various types, especially where crabs and
other invertebrates are numerous (CSTC 1990, NMFS and USFWS 2007).
Nesting occurs on well-defined elevated dune areas, especially on beaches backed up by large swamps or bodies of open water
having seasonal, narrow ocean connections.
Adult Food Habits: Invertivore
Immature Food Habits: Invertivore
Food Comments: Adults evidently are primarily benthic feeders that specialize on crabs; juveniles feed on sargassum, mollusks
often associated with sargassum, and fishes and shrimps probably discarded by anglers (Shaver 1991). Spider crabs and rock crabs
were important prey at Long Island, New York, where ridleys also consumed lady crabs, blue mussels, bay scallops, mud snails,
marine plants, and debris (Burke et al. 1994; Copeia 1993:1176-1180). Recorded stomach contents also include shrimp, sea urchins,

sea stars, and fishes.
Phenology Comments: In northern estuaries, diving activity peaked at dusk and dawn (see Morreale and Standora, no date).
Colonial Breeder: Y
Length: 70 centimeters
Weight: 45000 grams
EconomicP"-'- `--
Economic Comments: Eggs formerly were heavily exploited.
agement Summary
Management Requirements: The recovery plan (USFWS 1992) summarizes management needs. Frazer (1992) emphasized the
primary need for clean and productive marine and coastal environments; installation of turtle excluder devices in shrimp trawl nets and
use of low pressure sodium lighting on beaches were suggested as appropriate sea turtle conservation technologies, whereas
headstarting, captive breeding, and hatcheries were regarded as ineffective at best. Captive breeding was not regarded as a preferred
management tool by CSTC (1990). See also Bjorndal (1982).
Reduction in trawl -related mortality, through the use of turtle excluder devices and seasonal fisheries closures and/or reduced tow
times by shrimp trawlers, is regarded as a primary management need (Mitchell 1991, NMFS 1993, Lewison et al. 2003).
All nesting areas should be protected throughout the reproductive season (through hatchling emergence).
Group Name: Sea Turtles (Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae)
Use Class: Adult foraging area
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Reliable observation of multiple adults in an area that supports productive populations of
appropriate food organisms. Multiple years of information should be used to reliably identify significant, persistent occurrences.
Separation Barriers: None.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Separation distance refers to known areas of concentrated foraging activity. In most cases, occurrences
should not be extensive areas such as the entirety of Long Island Sound or Chesapeake Bay but rather portions of such areas that
stand out as strongly meeting the occurrence criteria.
Analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation have increased our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among certain populations
of sea turtles and have allowed the recognition of some evolutionarily distinctive units. However, available information on genetics,
dispersion, and movement patterns of most sea turtle populations generally is insufficient to determine biologically meaningful
separation distances for the different kinds of occurrences covered by the specifications. The separation distances used here do not
attempt to identify biologically distinct populations but rather are arbitrary values that attempt to identify relatively distinct geographic
areas that have frequent or concentrated activity and that are of practical size for conservation use. Additionally, these specifications
assume that it is best to have uniform occurrence standards for all sea turtle species, placing greater emphasis on the general
similarity of their life history patterns than on specific biological differences among species.
Foraging home range sizes of individual hawksbill turtles in the West Indies were 1.96-49.5 sq km and were positively correlated with
average water depth (Horrocks et al. 2001).
Date: 20Oct2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
Use Class: Hibernaculum
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Reliable observation of multiple dormant individuals. Multiple years of information should be
used to reliably identify significant, persistent occurrences.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Separation distance refers to known concentrations of dormant individuals. In most cases, occurrences
should not be extensive areas such as the Atlantic coast of Florida but rather portions of such areas that stand out as strongly
meeting the occurrence criteria.

Analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation have increased our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among certain populations
of sea turtles and have allowed the recognition of some evolutionarily distinctive units. However, available information on genetics,
dispersion, and movement patterns of most sea turtle populations generally is insufficient to determine biologically meaningful
separation distances for the different kinds of occurrences covered by the specifications. The separation distances used here do not
attempt to identify biologically distinct populations but rather are arbitrary values that attempt to identify relatively distinct geographic
areas that have frequent or concentrated activity and that are of practical size for conservation use. Additionally, these specifications
assume that it is best to have uniform occurrence standards for all sea turtle species, placing greater emphasis on the general
similarity of their life history patterns than on specific biological differences among species.
Date: 20Oct2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
Use Class: Juvenile foraging area
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Reliable observation of multiple juveniles in an area that supports productive populations of
appropriate food organisms. Multiple years of information should be used to reliably identify significant, persistent occurrences.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Separation distance refers to known areas of concentrated foraging activity. In most cases, occurrences
should not be extensive areas such as the entirety of Long Island Sound or Chesapeake Bay but rather portions of such areas that
stand out as strongly meeting the occurrence criteria.
Analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation have increased our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among certain populations
of sea turtles and have allowed the recognition of some evolutionarily distinctive units. However, available information on genetics,
dispersion, and movement patterns of most sea turtle populations generally is insufficient to determine biologically meaningful
separation distances for the different kinds of occurrences covered by the specifications. The separation distances used here do not
attempt to identify biologically distinct populations but rather are arbitrary values that attempt to identify relatively distinct geographic
areas that have frequent or concentrated activity and that are of practical size for conservation use. Additionally, these specifications
assume that it is best to have uniform occurrence standards for all sea turtle species, placing greater emphasis on the general
similarity of their life history patterns than on specific biological differences among species.
Date: 20Oct2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
Use Class: Nesting area
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Occurrences are based on evidence of historical presence, or current and likely recurring
presence, at a given location. Such evidence minimally includes collection or reliable observation and documentation of one or more
nesting individuals or nests with eggs.
Separation Barriers: None.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation have increased our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships
among certain populations of sea turtles and have allowed the recognition of some evolutionarily distinctive units. However, available
information on genetics, dispersion, and movement patterns of most sea turtle populations generally is insufficient to determine
biologically meaningful separation distances for the different kinds of occurrences covered by the specifications. The separation
distances used here do not attempt to identify biologically distinct populations but rather are arbitrary values that attempt to identify
relatively distinct geographic areas that have frequent or concentrated activity and that are of practical size for conservation use.
Additionally, these specifications assume that it is best to have uniform occurrence standards for all sea turtle species, placing greater
emphasis on the general similarity of their life history patterns than on specific biological differences among species.
Nesting populations on separate islands or mainland areas within the separation distance should be treated as parts of the same
occurrence. However, each distinct nesting location can be treated as a distinct sub -occurrence (sub -EO) or source feature for which
specific data can be recorded.
Date: 26Api2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
P.,nidnti ,rl/Occurrence Viability
Justification: Use the Generic Guidelines for the Application of Occurrence Ranks (2008).
The Key for Ranking Species Occurrences Using the Generic Approach provides a step -wise process for implementing this

method.
Key for Ranking Species Element Occurrences Using the Generic Approach (2008)
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I -Rank) Not yet assessed
Authors/Contributors
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Edition Date: 07Api2011
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Author: Hammerson, G., and D. R. Jackson
Element Ecology & Life History Edition Date: 25Feb2009
Element Ecology & Life History Author(s): Hammerson, G.
Zoological data developed by NatureServe and its network of natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors
and cooperators (see Sources).
ReferencP-
• Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. 2005.
Conserving Alabama's wildlife: a comprehensive strategy. Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources,
Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries. Montgomery, Alabama. 303 pages. [Available online at
http://www.dcnr.state.al.us/research-mgmt/cwcs/outline.cfm ]
• Bjorndal, K. A., editor. 1982*. Biology and conservation of sea turtles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 583 pp.
*Copyright date, date on title page is "1981."
• Bowen, B. W., A. B. Meylan, and J. C. Avise. 1991. Evolutionary distinctiveness of the endangered Kemp's ridley sea turtle.
Nature 352:709-711.
• Burke, V. J., E. A. Standora, and S. J. Morreale. 1991. Factors affecting strandings of cold -stunned juvenile Kemp's ridley and
loggerhead sea turtles in Long Island, New York. Copeia 1991:1136-1138.
• Burke, V. J., S. J. Morreale, and E. A. Standora. 1994. Diet of the Kemp's ridley sea turtle, Lepidochelys kempii, in New York
waters. Fishery Bulletin 92:26-32.
• Caillouet, C. W., Jr., C. T. Fontaine, S. A. Manzella-Tirpak, and D. J. Shaver. 1995. Survival of head -started Kemp's ridley sea
tirtles (LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII) released into the Gulf of Mexico or adjacent bays. Chelonian Conservation and Biology
1(4):285-292.
• Caillouet, C. W., Jr, and A. M. Landry, Jr., editors. 1989. Proccedings of the first international symposium in Kemp's sea turtle
biology, conservation and management. Texas A & M University Sea Grant Program 89-105:1-260.
• Campbell, L. 1995. Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas: Their Life History and Management. Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department, Endangered Resources Branch, Austin, Texas. ix + 129 pp.
• Committee on Sea Turtle Conservation (CSTC), National Research Council (U.S.). 1990. Decline of the Sea Turtles: Causes
and Prevention. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. xv + 259 pp.
• Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition.
Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
• Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of
Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and
Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84.
• Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of
Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and
Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm—names/Index.php
• Dodd, C. K., and R. A. Seigel. 1991. Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: are they
conservation strategies that work? Herpetologica 47:336-350.
• Ernst, C. H. and J. E. Lovich. 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada, second edition. The Johns Hopkins University
Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 827 pages.
Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 347 pp.
Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989. Turtles of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xii + 313 pp

Frazer, N. B. 1992. Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology. Conservation Biology 6:179-184
• Fritts, T. H., W. Hoffman, and M. A. McGehee. 1983. The distribution and abundance of marine turtles in the Gulf of Mexico and
nearby Atlantic waters. J. Herpetology 17:327-344.
• Godfrey, D. 1996. New riddles about Kemp's ridleys. Velador, Summer 1996: 1, 4, 5.
• Iverson, J. B. 1991. Patterns of survivorship in turtles (order Testudines). Canadian J. Zoology 69:385-391.
• King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic
reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pages.
• King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic
reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
• Lazell, J. D., Jr. 1980. New England waters: critical habitat for marine turtles. Copeia 1980:290-295.
• Lewison, R. L., L. B. Crowder, and D. J. Shaver. 2003. The impact of turtle excluder devices and fisheries closures on
loggerhead and Kemp's ridley strandings in the western Gulf of Mexico. Conservation Biology 17:1089-1097.
• Lutcavage, M., and J. A. Musick. 1985. Aspects of the biology of sea turtles in Virginia. Copeia 1985:449-456.
• Marquez, M. R., R. A. Byles, P. Burchfield, M. Sanchez, P. J. Diaz F., M. A. Carrasco A., A. S. Leo P. and C. Jiminez O. 1996.
Good news! Rising numbers of Kemp's ridleys nest at Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Marine Turtle Newsletter 73: 2-5.
• Marquez, R., J. Diaz, M. Sanchez, P. Burchfield, A. Leo, M. Crasco, J. Pena, C. Jimenez, and R. Bravo. 1999. Results of the
Kemp's ridley nesting beach conservation efforts in Mexico. Marine Turtle Newsletter (85):2-4.
• Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North
America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds,
Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham
Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
• Meylan, A., P. Castaneda, C. Coogan, T. Lozon, and J. Fletemeyer 1990. LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPI (Kemp's ridley sea turtle).
Reproduction. Herpetological Review 21:19-20.
• Mirarchi, R. E., M. A. Bailey, T. M. Haggerty, and T. L. Best, editors. 2004. Alabama wildlife. Volume 3. Imperiled amphibians,
reptiles, birds, and mammals. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 225 pages.
• Mirarchi, R.E., editor. 2004. Alabama Wildlife. Volume 1. A checklist of vertebrates and selected invertebrates: aquatic
mollusks, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 209
pages.
• Mitchell, J. C. 1991. Amphibians and reptiles. Pages 411-76 in K. Terwilliger (coordinator). Virginia's Endangered Species:
Proceedings of a Symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• Morreale, S. J., and E. A. Standora. No date. Occurrence, movement and behavior of the Kemp's ridley and other sea turtles in
New York waters. Final Report, April 1988 - March 1993. Okeanos Ocean Research Foundation and Return a Gift to Wildlife
Program (New York Department of Environmental Conservation). 70 pp.
• Morreale, S. J., et al. 1992. Annual occurrence and winter mortality of marine turtles in New York waters. J. Herpetology 26:301-
308.
• Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn,
Alabama. vii + 347 pages.
• Mount, R. H., editor. 1986. Vertebrate animals of Alabama in need of special attention. Alabama Agricultural Experiment
Station, Auburn University, Alabama. 124 pages.
• Mrosovsky, N. 1983. Conserving sea turtles. British Herpetological Society. 176 pp.
• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Status reviews for sea turtles
listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland. vi + 139 pp.
• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Kemp's ridley sea turtle
(Lepidochelys kempii). 5 -year review: summary and evaluation. NMFS, Silver Spring, Maryland, and USFWS, Albuquerque,
New Mexico. 50 pp.

• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1993. Sea turtle conservation, shrimp trawling requirements. Federal Register
58(158):43820-. 18 August 1993.
• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 1993. Sea turtle conservation; shrimp trawling requirements. Federal Register
58(181):48975-48978. 21 September 1993.
• Ogren, L. H. 1992. Atlantic ridley turtle LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII (Garman). Pages 100-104 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and
endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida.
• Palmatier, R. 1993. LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII (Kemp's ridley). Nesting. Herpetological Review 24:149-150.
• Phillips, P. 1989. The great ridley rescue. Mountain Press, Missoula, Montana.
• Renaud, M. L. 1995. Movements and submergence patterns of Kemp's ridley turtles (LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII). Journal of
Herpetology 29:370-4.
• Renaud, M. L., J. A. Carpenter, J. A. Williams, and A. M. Landry, Jr 1996. Kemp's ridley sea turtle (LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII)
tracked by satellite telemetry from Louisiana to nesting beach at Rancho Nuevo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Chelonian Conservation
and Biology 2(1):108-109.
• Ross, J. P. 1996. Caution urged in the interpretation of trends at nesting beaches. Marine Turtle Newsletter (74): 9-10.
• Schmid, J. R., and W. N. Witzell. 1997. Age and growth of wild Kemp's ridley turtles (LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPI): cumulative
results of tagging studies in Florida. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2:532-537.
• Shaver, D. J. 1991. Feeding ecology of wild and head -started Kemp's ridley sea turtles in South Texas waters. J. Herpetology
25:327-334.
• Shaver, D. J. 1992. LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII (Kemp's ridley sea turtle). Reproduction. Herpetological Review 23:59.
• Shore, T. 2000. Creating a Kemp's ridley marine reserve in Texas: the missing link in a proven protection strategy. Endangered
Species Update 17:35-39.
• Taubes, G. 1992. A dubious battle to save the Kemp's ridley sea turtle. Science 256: 614-616.
• Thompson, N.B. 1990. Management oriented research: marine turtles in the southeastern United States. In Mitchell, et al.
(eds.). Ecosystem management: rare species and significant habitats. New York State Museum Bull. 471.
• Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Shaffer, H.B., Bour, R., and Rhodin, A.G.J.]. 2012. Turtles of the
world, 2012 update: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J.,
Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation
Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist
Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5:000.243-000.328. Online. Available: vwwv.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
v.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
• U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 1980. Selected vertebrate endangered species of the seacoast of the United States-- Kemp's
(Atlantic) ridley sea turtle. FWS/OBS-80/01.30.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service. 1992. Recovery plan for the Kemp's ridley sea
turtle LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII. Nationals Marine Fisheries Service, St. Petersburg, Florida.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406
PP.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Multi -species recovery plan for the threatened and endangered species of South
Florida. Technical/Agency draft, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia.
Van Meter, V. B. 1983. Florida's sea turtles. Florida Power & Light Company, Miami. 46 pp.
Wilson, R. V., and G. R. Zug. 1991. LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 509:1-8
Zug, G. R., and C. H. Ernst. 1994. LEPIDOCHELYS. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 587:1-6.
Use Guidelines & Citatioi.
Use Guidelines and Citation

The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.
Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org were
updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of October 2015.
Note: This report was printed on February 28, 2017
Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and all other names of NatureServe programs
referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company names mentioned herein are the trademarks of
their respective owners.
Copyright Notice: Copyright © 2015 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights
Reserved. Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary notices and copyright information
relating to that document. The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference the web site.
Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2015. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorernatureserve.org. (Accessed: February 28,
2017).
Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003.
Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington,
Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature
Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US,
and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."
Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and
B. E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0.
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli,
Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy -Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International -CABS,
World Wildlife Fund -US, and Environment Canada -WI LDS PACE."
Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN,
Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World
Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."
NOTE: Full metadata for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www. natu reserve. org/I i brary/bi rd Di stri buti on m apsmetadatavl . pdf.
Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www. natu reserve.org/I i brary/mam malsDistri bution metadatavl . pdf.
Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from this server is hereby granted under the
following conditions:
1. The above copyright notice must appear in all copies;
2. Any use of the documents available from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no
instance for commercial purposes;
3. Some data may be downloaded to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should
still be referenced using the citation above;
4. No graphics available from this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying
text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be
construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any trademark of
NatureServe. No trademark owned by NatureServe may be used in advertising or promotion pertaining to the
distribution of documents delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe.
Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or
right under any NatureServe copyright.

Information Warranty Disclaimer: All documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents which are
referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any
specific data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to any documents provided by this server or
any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all implied warranties and
conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non -infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about
the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In
no event shall NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, or for damages of any kind
arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided by this server or in
any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update or
make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment
to update the information contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually being updated, it is advisable to
refresh data retrieved at least once a year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and informational
purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory
agencies. If ground -disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate state natural heritage program(s) or conservation
data center can be contacted for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit Local Programs).
Feedback Request: NatureServe encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions that you find in the data
through (see Contact Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall quality of our databases for the benefit of
all users.
41 NatureServe Version 7.1 (2 February 2009)
Data last updated: October 2015

APPENDIX E
CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES
PHASE I SU RVEY
(Included as separate document)

/_laa4ZIo7/:41�
BUFFER DETERMINATION REQUEST

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
t DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secrelmy
Water Resources
ENVIAONMENTALQUALITY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
DWR Use Only: Project #:
Date Received:
Buffer Applicability / Stream Origin Determination Request
Property Owner Information
1. Owner Information (corporation/individual who is legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
1a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed
1b. Responsible Party (for LLC) Mr. Ben Saunders — Dominion North Carolina Power
1c. Mailing Address 701 East Cary Street
1d. Telephone Number 804-771-4061 1e. Email address [e-mail]
2. Address of Property or Location of Project Site (including county, nearest named town, and highway or road name/ number):
The proposed transmission line originates at the Trowbridge Substation south of the Roanoke River, east of Ken Trowbridge Road
(Route 149), and north of Sandhill Road in Washington County. From the Trowbridge Substation the ROW runs generally southeast
to the Pantego Substation north of Main Street (Route 99), south of Beech Ridge Road (Route 1701), and west of Neck Road in
Beaufort County. A Location Map (Figure 1) is provided for reference.
3.
3a. Agent/ Consultant Name
Agent / Consultant Information
Mr. Scott Kupiec, PWD
3b. Company
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
3c. Mailing address
5209 Center Street, Williamsburg VA 23188
3d. Telephone no.
757-220-6869
3e. Email address
[e-mail]
4.
4a. Name of project
Project/ Site Information
Trowbridge — Pantego 115 kV
Transmission Line
4c. Nearest Named Stream
The project crosses Conaby Creek
and is within the East Dismal Swamp
and Pantego Creek drainage basins.
4b. County I Washington and Beaufort I 4d. River Basin I Roanoke and Pamlico
5. Project Description (attach plan if available) The Trowbridge — Pantego 115kV Transmission Line project consists of a proposed 115
kV transmission line right of way (ROW) extending approximately 24.79 miles and proposed expansion of the Trowbridge and
Pantego substations.
6. Has anyone from DWQ Y / N Staff Name: Date of Visit:
visited the site? i J
7. Attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo and/or NRCS Soil Survey
If you are unable to locate either of these maps, please contact the DWR Washington Regional Office for assistance.
DWR Use Only: Is this determination for the purpose of Buffer mitigation? Nutrient offset credit?
8. Please return form to: Anthony Scarbraugh
943 Washington Square Mall Note: Submittals on Friday after 12:00 pm
Washington, NC 27889 Will be stamped as received on the
Email: Anthon .Scarbrau Next business day h ncdenr.
Please contact Anthony Scarbraugh at the Washington Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
Washington Regional Office 1 943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 27889
252 946 6481

770996
Figure No.
r
w
�
40
Title
Soils Map
i
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
Client/Project
?,
:f�
Q�
`
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 1 15 kV Transmission Line
A
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-05-19
Washington Counties, NC
Indepe nden}Reuiew by RLR on 2017-0519
•.,
t*,
sr1'�
r
s
0!9
}^a��
-
�T
0 1,000 2,000
i Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
Trowbridge Substation
�.
• "~ • }
® Project Limits
't,VIII
J
k'
6
IA..
Az
1
Notes
Ci
yr
Cf»
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
�i.
' •
''�
f 7
1
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
>/IY
-��
`� Dominion`,
,<.
�.. .�
.T-
Sta ntec
J1100% ;IAX
`�•
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The
2657475
recipient ac ce is full
res onsib ilii for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims ansing in any wayfrom the content or promsion of the data.
Page 1 of 11

754592
Figure No.
Title
Soils Map
/yR
li.�
Su bm iffe d: 2017-0519
GL
,
.I
Client/ Project
_. -
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
�.
4,
Project Location Pre pared—MC;S on0 17-0530
Beaufort and pare y -19
Washington Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-05-19
Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
•
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
(
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Project Limits
, 1 N
rte'
cc
-
a
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
C
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
r
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted With permission from
Microsoft Corporation
Dominion`
P
Sta ntec
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic
format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying
754592
the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,fmm an and all claims ansinq in anywayfrom
the content orpromsion of the data.
Page 2 of 11

Figure No.
CP - -
r
Title
uF1
�-'
Soils Map
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
Client/Project
a
Dominion North Carolina Power
+
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Was hing }on Counties, NC Technical Re New by TPS on 2017-05-19
Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
0 1,000 2,000
AP
Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Project Limits
rt'
1111
ti
spa
- 'Nkk�.
. 1
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
-{
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
"j
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
rr
Microsoft Corporation
Dominion`
Sta ntec
Page 3 of 11
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content or prn of the data.

-3212-
Figure No.
L {
ZD
+�
f4w
,7�zy,
Title
Soils Map
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
Ac
v.
ar
#
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
-
_
_
�4
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Beaufort and Technical Reuew by TPS on 2017 -OS -19
Washington Counties, NC Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
f
_ f' •
L ( .•? ' a
�M 1 -� R"•` -d
*+
Y
Legend
® Project Limits
C11 -1
W
f�
4
In
tt
1
t
*
'
yb�n
-
*
r
• 1
+ -
!
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
• *s _
2. Project limits version 20170322
r
ti
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery ©Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
►
Microsoft Corporation
�r.
Dominion`
+
F
f
Sta ntec
a
W.
* �
Page 4 of 11
738187
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content orpromsion of the data.

26738]9
Figure No.
Title
r -^-� -. •.s.-._--.-.
Soils Map
...+AwR
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
Dominion North Carolina Power
•Client/Project
<1
.% �11�y`
•�'� - �
•
.mT a. jfa��
' e __•
p R
J
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
AWAW
a:�y,,
�--}�
MM rw
•" �r� . � ,
xi
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Washington Counties, NC Tech Prepared
R—iew by TPS on 201705-19
Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
,tel
140
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
b, y?
`�"'
Legend
•
a p' R
®Project Limits
It
„s
�)
_
_ •e. •.
S
sy
�«i ~
n�
� R
t
•
� Y
I3E
x
'
+
Notes ,
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
...;
.
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shots reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
Dominion`,
Stantec
0
Disclaimer: S}a n}ec assumes no res onsibili forda}a su lied in ele cironic forma}. The re ci ien} acce
}s full res onsib ilii for veri in
2673879
the acc urac and com le }en ess of the do to the reci ien} releases S}an}ec, its officers, em loye consultants and a en}s,
from an and all claims arisin a from the con}en}
721783
or r n of }he da}a.
Page 5 of 11

2690283
Figure No.
,• .
•„V- i�•..
Title
Soils Map
�jpe.sc +
Su bm itte d: 2017- 0519
•w , ,- S
�
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
3..
`'• ,. •`„��I,r. a � ,
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
•t i'
Project Location 203400630
Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Beaufort and o on
Washington Counties, NC Technic llleo—loyTS 207- 5-19
Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
M
-
- _ �.--.»..rwiaT:1►+►'_ -. '' ' a �.• d _
-WP^ ,Mrr�
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Project Limits
z
1
i y
V.
ON, i +
r xr
y
f
A g r
i
#
.
r
,�•:
Y",
4 k�
..
Notes
1 Coordinates m' NAD 83 '
StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
- -'- Y-•- """
vers 39
2 Project limits ion 20170 22
. �r i
U.S.mento Agriculture Soil
3 Base Soils Map provided by U. Depart f
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery© Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted With permission from
�1
Microsoft Corporation
i
T
SRI
Dominion`
le
-
Stantec
NA
Page 6 of 11
7217a3
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for venfying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and allclaimsonsinq in anywayfrom the content or pro msion of the data.

721783
log
Figure No.
Title
Soils Map
4
w
y
/
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
'•
♦� 1
���w..r.� /�
IM'•Feet
ate_
Project Location Pre d by MC;S on0 17-0530
Beaufort and pare y -19
Washington Counties, NC Tpend cal Re New by TPS on 2017-05-19
Independent by RLR on 2017-0519
0 1,000 2,000
p'
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
«�
r
® Project Limits
i
�A
y-
• �` fes"
A ;
-
�'
4
1
Ole
/11 SII••' _
i
11w,
5.
•IV
y.,,
. 1
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
�I
-
.
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
r
� r
Dominion`,
Sta ntec
Page 7 of 11
269028.3
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for veri inthe accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims an a from the content orpromsion of the data.

-053-9
Figure No.
c
Title
Soils Map
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
} -
(
4111"- �
yy,..
}�
�r
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
s..
1110
''aYKY LY Ora
Project Location n 2 170630
Beaufort and Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Washington Counties, NC Tpend cal Rei—by TPS on 201705-19
Independent by RLR on 2017-0519
1
"
0 1,000 2,000
I Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
h
® Project Limits
CC
o
�
1
w
}Notes
a.
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
_
-
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
Dominion
_ �^
Stantec
Page 8 of 11
70sa79
in electronic format. The recipient acce is full responsibility for venfying the accurac and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content orpromsion of the data.
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato suppliedm

Figure No.
,M NY•�
Title
Soils Map
v�
Su bm it to d: 2017-0519
,yr.ia w L i�
•`
AP
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Preon 2 17-05-19
Technical Reruew bed by yfTPSC;S on 2017 OS -19
Washington Counties, NC
Independent Reuiew by RLR on 2017-0519
aNM +*�
gyp:
yds"
•+�
[SI
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
® Project Limits
'
wo
ICA
woe
Y
AF
'rFMIM� �..11:
� NyM_yp
R
L
d
-
_
-
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
' .7!"-•
+max
..••-j°,� «�"�"^
/,
x
.,.�i,
q
-
provided
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
r.
IF
Dominion
..,,
12.
Sta ntec
Disclaimer: S}a n}ec assumes no responsibility forda}a supplied in electronic forma}. The recipient accepts full
2wosas esa975
responsibility for ven in the accuracy and completeness of the data. the recipient releases S}an}ec, its officers, em to a consultants and a ents,from an and all claims ansin a from the content or r n of the data.
Page 9 of 11

Figure No.
-
Title
Soils Map
Submitte d: 2017 05 19
61,
'j
�
`
71
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
r
' #4
Project Location 203400630
Beaufort and Prepared by MGS on 2017-05-19
Washington Counties, NC Tech ncal Re New by TPS on 2017 05-19
Independent Review by RLR on 2017-0519
. - - . , .•
i
0 1,000 2,000
I Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
.•' '
Legend
® Project Limits
r
Notes
'� ..
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
�„�"''• - � - - - - - ;. �,
q.t f - -,
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
40Dominion
(3 Stantec
V:
_ s
--
Page 10 of 11
esa97s
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no res onsibili for data su lied in electronic format. The reci ient acce is full res onsibili} for ven in the accurac and corn Ieteness of the data. The reci ienf releases Sfanfec, its officers, em Io a sultants and a ents, from an and all claims ansin a from the content or r n of the data.

Figure No.
e � f •,�.,,•. ,� f �,.
Title
Soils Map
Submi}}e d: 2017 05 19
Client/Project
Dominion North Carolina Power
Trowbridge - Pantego 115 kV Transmission Line
Project Location 203400530
try"
/
/ ���.....""""' Yom• �` FFFWashingtonTechnical
l.>r � y �i l i r ^� ✓ 1,.� fY \ "4 E
.•, - i �t J Z f �r ' "y �."+. �` i^-,: �"
F
Prepared y
Beaufort and c red b MGS on 2017- 5-19
e iew by TPS on 2017-05-19
Counties, NC Indepe nden}Revtew by RLR on 20 705
0 1,000 2.000
Feet
f,.!
1:12,000 (At original document size of 11x17)
Legend
Project Limits
Is
47
11 % Q _` y. i ".`�^' . i""_,.-,.^ z • sip
,.meq
Pan/tde,go Subsfftation'A t
/ `
/~
61,
{w #f t :T ,f
Notes
N
• ,
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Feet
2. Project limits version 20170322
3. Base Soils Map provided by U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service 1974
4. Orthoimagery © Bing Maps
•s
5. Microsoft product screen shot(s) reprinted with permission from
Microsoft Corporation
�t
R �`\q � �f �W j'
Dominiow
Sta ntec
w
Page 11 of 11
672571
in electronic format. The recipient acce is full responsibility for venfying the accurac and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Sfanfec, its officers, employees,m consultants and a ents,froan and all claims ansing in anywayfrom the content or r of the data.
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility fordato suppliedm n