20170400 Ver 1_401 Application_20170405

Pre -Construction Notification
Mill Pond Solar, LLC
Proposed Solar Development
20170400
US Highway 64 & Mill Pond Road
NO Jamesville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. SEO.002-3
April 3, 2017
1
=@
hart hickman
APR a 5 2017
�10 SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.586.0007 main
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27607
919.847.4241 main
#C-1269 Engineering
#-245 Geology
www.harthickman.com

Via Federal Express and Email
April 3, 2017
US Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West 5h Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Attention: Mr. Kyle Barnes
Re: Pre -Construction Notification
Mill Pond Solar, LLC
Proposed Solar Development
Intersection of US Highway 64 and Mill Pond Road
Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. SEO.002-3
Dear Kyle:
1.0 Introduction
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
On behalf of the property developer, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the attached Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) for the proposed construction of a solar development in
Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site consists of an
approximate 85 -acre parcel of primarily agricultural land located southwest of the intersection of
US Highway 64 and Mill Pond Road (Parcel # 0100324). H&H is submitting the PCN
application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in order to receive verification to use
Nationwide Permit #14. H&H is also seeking concurrence from the North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR).
H&H previously submitted a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Request to Mr.
Kyle Barnes of the USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office for approval. Mr. Matt Ingalls
and Mr. J.C. Weaver of H&H met with Mr. Barnes on November 4 and December 16, 2015 to
review the stream and wetland boundaries. After implementing recommended adjustments to
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 vww.harthicknian.con,
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Mr. Kyle Barnes
April 3, 2017
Page 2
stream and wetland boundaries, Mr. Barnes verbally approved H&H's flagged boundaries for
three streams and seven wetlands discussed below. Mr. Barnes has yet to issue written approval
of the PJD request pending review of a completed survey plat for the on -Site streams and
wetlands. A complete PJD request with a survey plat is included in Appendix E.
2.0 Stream and Wetland Delineation
Rtreamc
As mentioned above, H&H conducted a stream and wetland delineation of the subject Site in
October 2015. During the survey, H&H identified the following three (3) streams on the Site
that convey drainage between the wetlands areas, and which appear to maintain characteristics
consistent with those of a jurisdictional stream:
• Stream `A' (SCA) - an approximate 151 linear ft (LF) intermittent stream located in the
central portion of the Site;
• Stream `B' (SCB) — an approximate 259 LF high ephemeral/low intermittent stream
located in the west -central portion of the Site; and
• Stream `E' (SCE) — an approximate 121 LF high ephemeral/low intermittent stream
located in the east -central portion of the Site.
Wetlands
During the survey, H&H identified the following seven (7) forested areas on the Site, which
appear to maintain characteristics consistent with those of a jurisdictional wetland:
• Wetlands `A' and `B' — approximate 0.368 and 0.017 -acre wetland areas, respectively,
located in the west -central portion of the Site. Drainage from Wetland `A' is conveyed in
an east -southeasterly direction towards Wetland `C' via SCA, and drainage from Wetland
`B' is conveyed in a northeasterly direction towards Wetland `A' via SCB.
` hickman
S:\AAA Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO 002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCN\Cover letter. doc hart
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
April 3, 2017
Page 3
• Wetland `C' — an approximately 0.282 -acre wetland area located in the central portion of
the Site. Wetland `C' drainage is conveyed in an easterly direction towards Wetland `D'
via a collapsed 24 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culvert.
• Wetland `D' and Wetland `E' — approximate 0.962 and 0.213 -acre wetland areas,
respectively, located in the east -central portion of the Site. Wetland `E' drainage is
conveyed in a northerly direction towards Wetland `D' via SCE. Wetland `D' drainage is
conveyed in a southeasterly direction towards Welch Creek located off -Site.
• Wetland `I' and Wetland `J' - approximate 0.112 and 0.324 -acre wetland areas,
respectively, located in the southwestern portion of the Site. Wetland `I' drainage is
conveyed in a southerly direction towards Wetland `J' through a non jurisdictional
drainage feature. Wetland `J' drainage is conveyed in a southwesterly direction towards
Welch Creek located off -Site through a non jurisdictional drainage feature.
Surface Water Features
There is also a jurisdictional surface water feature (SWA) located in the southwestern portion of
the Site adjacent to Wetland `J' that encompasses approximately 0.076 acre. SWA drainage is
also conveyed in a southwesterly direction towards Welch Creek located off -Site through a non -
jurisdictional drainage feature.
3.0 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Features
Permanent Impacts
To facilitate widening of an existing road crossing in the central portion of the site, the developer
is proposing to impact a total of 0.032 acre of on -Site wetlands at the following two locations
(Impacts 1 and 2):
• Impact 1 - consists of filling approximately 0.014 acre of wetlands in the eastern portion
of Wetland `C' adjacent to the existing 24 -inch CMP culvert.
haft hickman
S.\AAA Master Projects\Sun Energy 1 (SEO)\SEO 002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCN\Cover Letter. doe
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
April 3, 2017
Page 4
• Impact 2 -consists of filling approximately 0.018 acre of wetlands in the western portion
of Wetland `D' adjacent to the existing 24 -inch CMP culvert.
Both wetland impacts are associated with the proposed widening of the existing roadway to
increase the width of the roadway from 10 feet wide to 20 feet wide. As associated with the
widening of the roadway, the wetland impacts involve the removal of the existing collapsed 24 -
inch CMP culvert and the installation of a 48 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert to
improve the existing access roadway that runs throughout the Site. Impact 2 also involves the
installation of a rip rap outlet protection on the downgradient side of the proposed 48 -inch RCP
culvert. Site developers have decided to completely avoid Wetland `A', Wetland `B', Wetland
`E', Wetland `I', and Wetland `J' to minimize impacts to on-site wetlands.
Temporary Impacts
The developer is also proposing to temporarily impact 0.018 acre of on -Site wetlands.
Temporary Impact 1 is associated with Impact 1 and the upgradient side of the proposed
installation of the 42 -inch RCP culvert. Temporary Impact 1 totals approximately 0.005 acre.
Temporary Impact 2 is associated with Impact 2 and the downgradient side of the proposed
installation of the 42 -inch RCP culvert along with the installation of the rip rap outlet protection.
Temporary Impact 2 totals approximately 0.013 acre. Both temporary impacts provide
additional room to allow equipment access for the installation of the culverts and rip rap outlet
protection associated with the improvement to the roadway crossing. However, there will be no
permanent structures, cut, or fill within the areas of temporary impact. After culvert and rip rap
outlet protection installation is complete, the developer proposes to restore the temporary impact
areas to preconstruction conditions using native soils and native vegetation.
Mitigation
Mitigation is required by the USACE Nationwide Permit # 14 for impacts greater than 0.1 acre of
wetlands. Due to the planned impacts of 0.032 acre to on -Site wetlands, compensatory
mitigation is not currently proposed.
hart hickman
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO 002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCN\Cover Letter. doe
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Kyle Barnes
April 3, 2017
Page 5
H&H is seeking a Nationwide Permit #14 verification for this development. A copy of the PCN
submittal package has also been forwarded to DEQ DWR.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
11,P—
Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Attachments
Danielle Birmingham
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
cc: NC DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, Raleigh, NC (4 Copies of PCN and $240.00
Check via FedEx)
Mr. Kelly Hoyt, SunEnergyl (via email)
Ms. Lindsey Hesch, SunEnergyI (via email)
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCMCover Letter.doc
14
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

O`�oF W A T E9pG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 In.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Mill Pond Solar
2b.
County:
Martin
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jamesville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Seth A. Davis Heirs c/o William L. Davis
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
X-7/156
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
5770 Regents Village Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Property Developer
4b.
Name:
Ms. Lindsey Hesch
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
SunEnergy1
4d.
Street address:
6750 NC Hwy 30 E
4e.
City, state, zip:
Bethel, NC 27812
4f.
Telephone no.:
252-825-1731
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Matt Ingalls
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart and Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0100324
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.826323 Longitude: -76.790908
1 c.
Property size:
85 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Welch Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; SW
2c.
River basin:
Roanoke
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of one parcel (0100324) located south of Highway 64 and west of Mill Pond Road in Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina. The
Site consists primarily of agricultural land and undeveloped wooded land. Light industrial use is to the north, residential use and vacant undeveloped
land is to the east, vacant undeveloped land is to the south, and agricultural land is to the west and south.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.279
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 531
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to develop a solar utility farm that will connect to a three-phase electrical distribution line.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The on-site system will consist of a single -axis tracking system, which will track the sun from east to west. First, posts will be installed followed by racking
then the distribution cable will be trenched. Lastly, panels are installed and wired. The project also involves the improvement of an existing roadway to
be used for ingress and egress throughout the site.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: See Appendix E
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑X Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): JC Weaver
Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H)
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Mr. Kyle Barnes of USACE visited the site with H&H on November 4 and December 16, 2015. After implementing recommended adjustments to the
stream and wetland boundaries, Mr. Barnes verbally approved H&H's flagged boundaries. A complete PJD request is included in Appendix E.
6.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ YesX❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Non-Riverine Swamp Forest
Yes
Corps
0.014
W2 P
Culvert
Non-Riverine Swamp Forest
Yes
Corps
0.018
W3 T
Culvert
Non-Riverine Swamp Forest
Yes
Corps
0.005
W4 T
Culvert
Non-Riverine Swamp Forest
Yes
Corps
0.013
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.05
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Not applicable.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
o
4g. Comments: Not Applicable
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Not Applicable
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑X Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Not Applicable
Page 5of10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Appendix C
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Appendix C
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: Not Applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: Not Applicable.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Not Applicable.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
YesX❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.8%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
It is
not required by the state or local ordinance.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NIA
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑X Other: NIA
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑ No N/A
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑0 R
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑X Other: N/A
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
attached?
S.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
Page 8of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes Q No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
F1 Yes Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will not be generated on the project site and therefore, wastewater disposal is not required.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and US Fish & Wildlife Service on-line databases and on-site reconnaissance (See Appendix D)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office databases and on-site reconnaissance (See Appendix D)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
_T
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3720675600.1
Matt Ingalls
04-03-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
PLYMOUTH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1998
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
85 -ACRE PROPERTY
MILL POND ROAD
JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
hart
� h i c k m a n 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 10C.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (E)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
03-15-17
REVISION NO: 1
JOB NO:
SEO-002
FIGURE: 1

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOUMNS

Agent Certification of Authorization
I, _} Dpi I representing the prospective developer of Parcel
0100324 which is located at the intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64 in
Jamesville, Martin County, NC (approx. 85 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart
& Hickman, PC to act on prospective developer's behalf and take all actions
necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination and 401/404 permitting for this property.
Prospective Developer's Signature Agent's Signature
Name/Title: Kent/ 1400 , FPO- Pr�row. M000ter Matt Ingalls
Company: S', F 4 cf,� I- Hart & Hickman, PC
3 /u%/ �— 3/22/17
Date Date

Appendix B
Survey Map, Proposed Wetland Impacts, & Overall Site Design Plan
10
hart hickman
SMARTER ENMtONMENTAI SOLUPONS

x
W _ -
�6�t4p-
�o
o v�j N - •4 v' = S 69' 15'21 "E
101.73' _
•^ o`� •4 _ S 68'35' 18"E 74.78'
34'07'28"E 82.77'
h
h
h �m S 03'3516"W 73.33' 06'36'12"W 163.47'
67
S 00 03'26"E 32.01 _
- 88'34'31"W 30.01'
�^
0 -
w �
u
rn
N 0
r1
� Or, J
�r
0
ETLAND A
^ STREAM B STREAM A WETLAND C
- _ a S 01'49'37"E 64.22
N'
02'40'16"W 44.74'
w
ETLAND B _ `^ - S OT23'35"W 44.67'
cl
10'28'58W 47.20'
Z COLLAPSED 24" CMP 14'29'32"W 47.44'
- ® WETLAND D
17'33'19"W 48.41'
_ 19'44'56W 43.79'
23'24'35W 45.57'
STREAM E- - 24'17'03"W 75.60'
Y _ 18'46'34W 76.81' WETLAND DATA POINT TABLE
_r/ETLAND E- 63'55'00'E 7.51' DATA POINT LATITUDE LONGITUDE
_ 45'00'28"W 30.30'
76'52'42W 38.74' WETLAND A 35.826499 -76792435
22'46'09'W 71.28' WETLAND 6 35.82597214 -76.79356766
_ 26'30'51'W 54.64'
- - WETLAND C 35.82639636 -76.7917332
26'07'50"E 62.98'
WETLAND D 35.82573756 -76.78997779
WETLAND E 35.825095 -76.79024758
WETLAND 1 w S 11'48'15"E 148.66' WETLAND 1 35.82448432 -76.79334374
- WETLAND J 35.822359 -76.793097
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES
^.-s• 3T00'18"E 103.68' FEATURE NAME AREA (ACRES) FEATURE NAME LENGHT (FT)
_ WETLAND A 0.36818 STREAM A 151
05'08'48"E 46.71' WETLAND B 0.01765 STREAM 6 259
' - S 42'53'04"E 46.21'
S 5432'33"E 47.99' WETLAND C 0.28184 STREAM E 121
-� 12'38'42"E 24.01' WETLAND D 0.96247
WETLAND E 0.21320
_ - 12'37'06'W 102.54' WETLAND 1 0.11217
- - - WETLAND J 0.32383
TOTAL WETLAND 2.27934
SWA 0.07569 TOTAL CHANNEL 531
WETLAND J S 03'16'11'W 227.25'
MAP LEGEND
_ - EXISTING PATH
- a_ _b
,
S 52'19'23W 88.54' �lo o`V �� �� RIGHT-OF-WAY
•' - o° Bch y''T JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND FEATURE
URFACE WATER AREA A (SWA) S d8'36'33"W 185.66' v,3 Mry p JURISDICTIONAL SURFACE WATER FEATURE
;t o hA
_ .� 2 JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
S 7T 43 54^N 1ry o _
82'36'13"W 2p2.82 cl, ------ -- TREE LINE
S 84'41'06W S
163.06
S 84!41'06"W 268.57'
252.91
WETLAND DATA POINT
PROJECT:
DATE: 10 MARCH 2017
MILL
POND SOLAR, LLC
NOTES:
1. BASE MAP INFORMATION
TITLE:
PROVIDED BY ROAOKE LAND
MILL
POND JD FEATURE MAP
SURVEYING ON 03//29/16
2. WETLAND DELINEATION PROVIDED
BY HART & HICKMAN, PC ON
SITE ADDRESS:
INTERSECTION OF US HWY 64 AND MILL POND RD
10/10/15 AND 10/11/15
JAMESVILLE, NC 27846
250 0 250 500 750 3. PARCEL OWNER: WILLIAM L.
SUNENERGYI, LLC
DAVIS AND MARY ELLEN DAVIS
192 RACEWAY DR
ELLIOTT
MOORESVILLE NC 28117
GRAPHIC SCALE -FEET 4. PARCEL ID: PORTION OF MARTIN
"'
(T) 704-662-0375
CO NC PARCEL 0100324
c_,LJ^EfV�RCY1 (F) 704-662-0352

- .._
Y41,
'y y "r
'.
o
--
EXISTING TREE LINE
'
STABILIZE BOTH THE WESTERN AND EASTERN SLOPES OF THE
W; o
ROAD WIDENING WITH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S75 MATTING
26
d
a
_.
In cP
O
a
.,_..
_
l j10
❑ x(
ti
cq
6
x '
o J
Lu ui
y
a
k
ogg
1 ¢,it
w
y fl
i3r
may^ '1� �w•',j���"' '"r„.
,
h
�k." (V A11 V iQ �
"�fZ
SILT ( ) -.
PROPOSED FENCE TYP
n
oy
DATE
03/27/17
\ P ^
ZJ Z', ,✓
X r
N '
<
DRAWN BY
J. DOOLEV
SIGNED BY
EXITING W L NDS t �
EI( „A
c�i o
04 N
r
��
EXISTING 30 LF 24 CMP TO BE REMOVED
T
•
J. DOOLEY
J.
CHECKED BY
R. BAKER
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #1o
PERMANENT: 606 SF (0.014 AC)
N _. 1' Lo
04
.r' V
�� .a
"'�
'" ,.,_
.,. „.....
• •
SCALE
i
TEMPORARY: 198 SF (0.005 AC)
`t
•
1 =20
I
„
,•`'°•°..
-
��04
cw'
PROPOSED 72 LF OF 48" RCP
•
_,
`"°✓"
s ,
UPHILL INVERT: 20.00'
DOWNHILL INVERT: 19.00'
-.FES #1
4
�
g
y
N t
w..
, .—
FES #2 �.
PROPOSED 12'W X 40'L X 36"D
CLASS 2 RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION11
N
'
01-1
�o
r
arm .,, p
1 d N
N
coNo `,
x
,
m
21
o
0
2
1 l
�
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #2 M
PERMANENT: 784 SF 0.018 AC
w
z
u
F
w
�
'-XISTI"NG.TREE4NE""
...
�. "_ �,
_.
.. TEMPORARY: 582 SF (0.013 AC)
w
Q
o
Z >�
F
z
z
°
r". i
`*.,
i TM
Z
J
a o
o
WETLAND IMPACT LEGEND
i..
r
��: I
r" ^,,� ..
, _
t' I
Q
u
� f
<
o
EXISTING WETLANDS �
zz
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
1,390 SF AC)
`' A'
(0.032
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
\
y
s` `x. y✓ `^^
780 SF (0.018 AC)
,7
°
(SEED AND STRAW)
.`^x.
SCAL 1"=20'
JOB N-01,
37571
Ol 20' 4 '
-14/
,,
SHEET NO.
EX1.0

77
4
ki

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
14
hart hickman
SMARTEN ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUMNS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Intersection of US Highway 64 and Mill Pond Road
Jamesville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. SEO.002-3
Avoidance
The proposed development is located southwest of the intersection of US Highway 64 and Mill
Pond Road in Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site consists
of one tax parcel (Parcel # 0100324) totaling approximately 85 acres.
H&H reviewed State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species databases for the Site and
conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area for Federal Threatened and
Endangered Species, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National Registry of
Historic Places (NRHP) for Sites located in Martin County, North Carolina; the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and surrounding area via
visual reconnaissance for the presence of historic, cultural, and/or archeological sites. No
recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. A barn and shed are present in the central
portion of the Site. These structures did not appear to be of significant historic, cultural, and/or
archeological value. H&H requested comment on the Site from the NC SHPO and a response
dated September 16, 2014 indicates that the NC SHPO does not have comment regarding the
Site. H&H also requested comment on the Site from NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) and
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). NHP and FWS responses are pending.
Request letters and the response from NC SHPO are included in Appendix D.
In regards to Site alternatives, the prospective developer has considered and evaluated other
potential properties in the area for development of the proposed solar development. However,
the Site is within close proximity and viability to interconnect with a three-phase electrical
distribution line. The Site is ideally positioned north -south; and therefore, the solar panels can
be installed in a north -south orientation, which allows the panels to track the sun as it rises in the
east and sets to the west. Furthermore, by utilizing an existing roadway and designing the solar
panels to occupy upland areas, the solar development completely avoids Wetland `A', Wetland
`B', Wetland `E' Wetland `I', and Wetland `J'.
1 hart 0 hickman
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCN\C - Avoid and Minimize.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Minimization
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid wetland impacts to the
maximum extent practicable. Solar panels have been designed to fully occupy upland areas.
Furthermore, the areas of proposed solar panel installation have been designed to occupy the
agricultural areas on -Site and therefore, little to no tree clearing is required for the development
of the solar panel areas.
The Site plan has been designed to utilize an existing roadway as the Site's access roadway from
Mill Pond Road. The roadway currently exists as a 10 -foot roadway. However, the developer
proposes to widen the roadway by an additional 10 feet to increase the size of the roadway to 20
feet to allow for the passage of maintenance vehicles throughout the Site. The roadway currently
crosses Wetland `C' and Wetland `D', and a 24 -inch CMP culvert exists beneath the roadway.
The culvert has since collapsed due to infrequent maintenance and the inadequate size of the
culvert to handle the stormwater flow volume in this area of the Site. To continue to utilize the
existing roadway, the developer is proposing to replace the 24 -inch CMP culvert with a 48 -inch
RCP culvert that has adequate size to handle the flow volumes between the wetland areas.
Wetland impacts have been minimized by utilizing an existing roadway and are limited to areas
required to widen the road and to replace the existing culvert.
To further minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid wetland impacts
to Wetland `A', Wetland `13% Wetland B', Wetland `I', and Wetland `Y. Of the 2.279 acres of
on -Site wetlands, the developer proposes impact to only 1.4% of on -Site wetlands. Impacts to
Wetland `C' and Wetland `D' have been designed to keep the majority of the wetland body
intact. In addition, the developer will implement best erosion and sediment control practices
during Site development. Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction site perimeter
and along wetland boundaries to prevent sediments from inadvertently filling the on -Site wetland
areas during construction.
2 14
hart hickman
S\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCMC - Avoid and Minimize. doc
SMARTER ENNRONMENTAI SOLUTIONS

Mitigation
Mitigation is required by the USACE Nationwide Permit #14 for impacts greater than 0.1 acre of
wetlands. Due to the planned impacts of 0.012 acre to on -Site wetlands, compensatory
mitigation is not currently proposed.
3 hart hickman
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy 1 (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\PCN\C - Avoid and Minimize doe
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix D
Supplemental Documents
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLU"ONS

hart 14
hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via E -Mail
March 15, 2017
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Asheville NC ES Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Attention: Ms. Janet Mizzi, Field Supervisor
Re: Request for Information and Comment
Proposed Solar Development
Martin Co. Parcel # 0100324
Intersection of Mill Pond Road & Highway 64
Jamesville, Martin County, NC
H&H Job No. SEO-002-3
Dear Janet:
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information concerning protected species and habitats
on or near the above -referenced site (hereafter referred to as the "Site"). This request is
submitted to satisfy corporate environmental stewardship and Federal/State wetland permitting
action. This request is not being submitted due to the use of Federal funds.
The Site consists of one tax parcel totaling approximately 85 acres of land (Martin County Parcel
#0100324) located southwest of the intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64 in
Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site; see Figure 1). The Site consists
primarily of agricultural land and undeveloped wooded land. Surrounding properties include
light industrial facilities to the north, single-family residential and vacant undeveloped land to
the east, vacant undeveloped land to the south, and agricultural land to the west and south.
Representative Site photos are attached to this letter.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Ms. Janet Mizzi
March 15, 2017
Page 2 of 5
In order to investigate the potential presence of protected flora and fauna on the Site, H&H
completed the following activities:
• contacted the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) by a similar letter;
• reviewed the Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List for Martin County in
North Carolina on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US FWS) website
http://www.fws.gov/endan eg red/;
• reviewed the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Natural
Heritage Program on-line database for records of Federal Threatened and Endangered
species occurrences for Martin County and the Plymouth West quadrangle on the DEQ
website http://portal.ncdenr.orp,/web/nhp/database-search;
• reviewed the Federal Registry and the US FWS information pertaining to Federally -
Designated Critical Habitats at the US FWS website http://crithab.fws.pov; and
• conducted an on-site visual survey in order to field screen the Site and peripheral areas
for federally protected species.
NC WRC
H&H requested comment on the potential presence of protected flora and fauna on the Site from
the NC WRC by a similar letter. A response from NC WRC is pending.
Federal Threatened and Endangered Species
H&H reviewed the US FWS Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List for Martin
County, North Carolina which includes the following protected species:
• Northern long-eared bat, (Myotis septentrionalis) — Threatened
hart ► hickman
SMARTER ENV1ROMAENTAt SOIUTI MS

Ms. Janet Mizzi
March 15, 2017
Page 3 of 5
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
H&H reviewed the North Carolina NHP on-line database for records of Federal Threatened and
Endangered species for Martin County, North Carolina which includes the following protected
species:
• Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) — Endangered
H&H also reviewed the North Carolina NHP on-line database for records of Federal Threatened
and Endangered species for the Plymouth West Quadrangle, North Carolina. The database
identified the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) as being present within the Site
quadrangle. Additional federally endangered species were not identified in the NHP Database.
Critical Habitats
H&H reviewed federal registry information pertaining to Federally -Designated Threatened and
Endangered Species Critical Habitats for the aforementioned species on-line at the US FWS
critical habitats on-line mapper. No Federally -Designated Critical Habitats were identified in the
Site area.
Visual Survey
In October 2015, H&H conducted a visual survey of the Site. Areas of potential habitat for
federally protected species were investigated within the wooded portions of the Site.
The wooded portion of the Site is a narrow strip of forested land located in the central portion of
the Site. The forested area consists primarily of young growth immature trees within a highly
fragmented portion of wooded land. Due to the lack of dead and dying mature trees with a high
amount of exfoliating bark and cavities and because the forested area is highly fragmented, H&H
determined suitable habitat does not exist for the Northern long-eared bat, (Myotis
septentrionalis). Furthermore, caves were not identified on -Site and therefore, hibernaculum
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLMM

Ms. Janet Mizzi
March 15, 2017
Page 4 of 5
does not exist on -Site. Due to the lack of a well-defined, clean, deep, and swiftly moving river
system, H&H determined suitable habitat does not exist for the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser
oxyrinchus).
During the survey, H&H did not observe evidence of federally listed species or their suitable
habitats on the Site.
Please review the above information and provide a written response as to the potential for this
project to affect protected species. If possible, please respond to this request within 30 days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Matt Ingalls Danielle Birmingham
Project Manager Asst. Project Environmental Scientist, Biologist
Attachments
14
hart hickman
WAIMR ENVIRONM€NTAt UXLMUNS

Ms. Janet Mizzi
March 15, 2017
Page 5 of 5
US Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Field Office response:
Based upon the available information, rare, threatened and endangered listed species are not
likely to occur on the project site.
IM
US Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Field Office
14
hart hickman
SMAMIt ENV1RONMEWAL SOLUPM

r
�4
\1
J
I �
rk
46
•..i r�. � t p p' 1 1 + �' I� r
1A + AAI Light �i� I • 164 141
- �1�9�=- fll _ _ moi! \ �.I: o � ��\ �`, r~, • -
r SITE rl s•�,< -
•: 1567;
it
i ,'• -�_.._ �:.� � � I �f �,��- �/ � �.. (1� it ,��_.�: tl
Darden
(-�C
'� /1 3asri y�� _ � gM• /
APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
PLYMOUTH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1998
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
85 -ACRE PROPERTY
MILL POND ROAD
JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
hart
� h i c k m a n 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (f)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
03-15-17
REVISION NO: 1
JOB NO:
SEO-002
FIGURE: 1

N
0
0
0
W
co
Photograph 3: Wetland area C located in the central portion of the site.
Photograph 4: Wetland area D located in the eastern portion of the site.
Ad 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(fl JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
W
U)
Photograph 5: Wetland area E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 6: Wetland area 1 located in the southwestern portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart : hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 I04.586 0007(p) 704.586.03730 JAMESVILLEILL PNNORTH OND ROAD
CAROLINA

t to
a
4,
S ¢t
n' ''
Photograph 7: Wetland area J located in the southwestern portion of the site.
'e
Photograph 8: Wetland soil with low chroma sampled in Wetland Area C located in the central portion of the site.
o 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
o haft 'e• hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
W ` 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(1] JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

s
17
�, w .sem k ,. •,.. (' 1tAt � _ ,
Com"" � s s�-v,�'- , ,'' "! � - � Via'_ s Y ��''� s ` ��, . t �' , • f. �, � � _
r v •
kY
i 44�
l*
I
+•. L..`�
r
is
c
�:w '.•4 -'\
- �• "C
A
- K.h 'SIS x• ..
, c=
a r
x• r
s
17
�, w .sem k ,. •,.. (' 1tAt � _ ,
Com"" � s s�-v,�'- , ,'' "! � - � Via'_ s Y ��''� s ` ��, . t �' , • f. �, � � _
r v •
kY
i 44�
l*
I
+•. L..`�
r

N
0
0
0
w
U)
Photograph 11: Stream channel E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 12: Upland area located in the central and northern portions of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart OND ROAD
► hickman 704.586.0 07(p) 704.586.0373(17 JAMESharlotte, NC 28203 VILLEILL PNORTH CAROLINA

hart ^` hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via E-mail
March 15, 2017
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
District 1 Wildlife Biologist
1722 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Attention: Mr. Chris Turner
Re: Request for Information and Comment
Proposed Utility Development
Martin Co. Parcel # 0100324
Intersection of Mill Pond Road & Highway 64
Jamesville, Martin County, NC
H&H Job No. SEO-002-3
Dear Chris:
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information concerning protected species and habitats
on or near the above -referenced site (hereafter referred to as the "Site"). This request is
submitted to satisfy corporate environmental stewardship and Federal/State wetland permitting
action. This request is not being submitted due to the use of Federal funds.
The Site consists of one tax parcel totaling approximately 85 acres of land (Martin County Parcel
#0100324) located southwest of the intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64 in
Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina (site or subject site; see Figure 1). The Site consists
primarily of agricultural land and undeveloped wooded land. Surrounding properties include
light industrial facilities to the north, single-family residential and vacant undeveloped land to
the east, vacant undeveloped land to the south, and agricultural land to the west and south.
Representative Site photos are attached to this letter.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Mr. Chris Turner
March 15, 2017
Page 2
In order to investigate the potential presence of protected flora and fauna on the subject site,
H&H recently conducted the following activities:
• contacted the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) office by a similar letter;
• reviewed the Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List for Martin County in
North Carolina on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US FWS) website
http://www.fws.gov/endan eg red/;
• reviewed the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Natural
Heritage Program on-line database for records of Federal Threatened and Endangered
species occurrences for Martin County and the Plymouth West quadrangle on the DEQ
website http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/nhp/database-search;
• reviewed the Federal Registry and the US FWS information pertaining to Federally -
Designated Critical Habitats at the US FWS website http://crithab.fws.gov; and
• conducted an on-site visual survey in order to field screen the Site and peripheral areas
for federally protected species.
US FWS
H&H requested comment on the potential presence of protected flora and fauna on the Site from
the US FWS by a similar letter. A response from US FWS is pending.
Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List
H&H reviewed the US FWS Federal Threatened and Endangered Species List for Martin
County, NC, which includes the following:
• Northern long-eared bat, (Myotis septentrionalis) — Threatened
Id
hart hickman
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\Agency Letters\WRC Letter docx
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Chris Turner
March 15, 2017
Page 3
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
H&H reviewed the North Carolina NHP on-line database for records of Federal Threatened and
Endangered species for Martin County, North Carolina which includes the following protected
species:
• Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) — Endangered
H&H also reviewed the North Carolina NHP on-line database for records of Federal Threatened
and Endangered species for the Plymouth West Quadrangle, North Carolina. The database
identified the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) as being present within the Site
quadrangle. Additional federally endangered species were not identified in the NHP Database.
Critical Habitats
H&H reviewed federal registry information pertaining to Federally -Designated Threatened and
Endangered Species Critical Habitats for the above listed species online at the FWS critical
habitats online mapper. No Federally -Designated Critical Habitats were identified in this area.
Visual Survey
In October 2015, H&H conducted a visual survey of the Site. Areas of potential habitat for
federally protected species were investigated within the wooded portions of the Site.
The wooded portion of the Site is a narrow strip of forested land located in the central portion of
the Site. The forested area consists primarily of young growth immature trees within a highly
fragmented portion of wooded land. Due to the lack of dead and dying mature trees with a high
amount of exfoliating bark and cavities and because the forested area is highly fragmented, H&H
determined suitable habitat does not exist for the Northern long-eared bat, (Myotis
septentrionalis). Furthermore, caves were not identified on -Site and therefore, hibernaculum
does not exist on -Site. Due to the lack of a well-defined, clean, deep, and swiftly moving river
haft� hickman
S\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\Agency Letters\WRC Letter. docx
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. Chris Turner
March 15, 2017
Page 4
system, H&H determined suitable habitat does not exist for the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser
oxyrinchus).
During the survey, H&H did not observe evidence of federally listed species or their suitable
habitats on the Site.
Please review the above information and provide a written response as to the potential for this
project to affect protected species. If possible, please respond to this request within 30 days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Matt Ingalls Danielle Birmingham
Project Manager Asst. Project Environmental Scientist, Biologist
Attachments
S\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy 1 (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\Agency Letters\WRC Letterdocx
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

--� ,
ca � ` r
1=' z�
n •' � fi� It
65t =� = }�� �. rk
— u
Mwi
If 1i
v
r ■ M itmilliI • _ fi'.II ��i �y i ar�_.`\ �.�•
3g6LI& it (, • 1 I • I I00
64
It
I1 92 _
�. SITE
����'� „ . `;; (1567, .�� � �� >' • � _„� �, �� �� • �
ens
k.
UW,+ ` a
Tp
� '�•� �,�„� `� ���� 1 1 ' ( tel} _ �� i •;'�./t��At I •�i�-
I .-�._ ` ,ems r _tt I l�� s ' 1 I �/ BM' •
APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
PLYMOUTH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1998
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
85 -ACRE PROPERTY
MILL POND ROAD
JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
hart
� h i c k m a n 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 1 OG
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (f)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
03-15-17
REVISION Ni 1
JOB NO:
SEO-002
FIGURE: 1

.` r;: '•� {a �S � t?4�" s � ]moi . ,�,,�.. �:.i i +� � 4 t
3 •p - _, •!*i {� !i�g i e:Y �� � I'�� 'd 11r .� iRtT
tk :- `.� + � - ► to Y�� Ys,,, 6
�?•��� � H �� �*, eat 1� � .� ` -�y YJr � � ,♦r� >!i' '��:.
7
y
•x
9'
�•i':• q.7q h}�.
x§
�d ♦
t ..
t
v�
i
i
4
04

14*/1 I -A` r sVt,
\a
i +
' A ;l �T�9 1,�, 4./dam^iI •"E-
" �i_. a ��.. /' .fie" . ( �. r ... crit h.ri•. r . a''�_. ieya` y�• ..
R V JA�
��•�
F -W
' r
i
If
c �..-0 low•.
1, ..

N
0
0
0
LU
U)
Photograph 5: Wetland area E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 6: Wetland area 1 located in the southwestern portion of the site.
14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart OND ROAD W hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 704,586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(1) JAMESVILLEILL PNORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
W
U)
Photograph 7: Wetland area J located in the southwestern portion of the site.
Photograph 8: Wetland soil with low chroma sampled in Wetland Area C located in the central portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart ^*M hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
W
co
Photograph 9: Stream channel A located in the central portion of the site.
Photograph 10: Stream channel B located in the western portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart AD W hickman Charlott704,586e0 07(p) 704.586.0373(f) JAMESVILLE, NC 28203 MILL PNORTHROND OCAROLINA

N
0
0
0
Li
U)
Photograph 11: Stream channel E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 12: Upland area located in the central and northern portions of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street. Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart hickman Charlotte NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
704 586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(q JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

hart '''� hickman
W
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Via l -Mail
March 15, 2017
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Attention: Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
Re: Request for Courtesy Review
Proposed Solar Development
Martin Co. Parcel # 0100324
Intersection of Mill Pond Road & Highway 64
Jamesville, Martin County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. SEO-002-3
Dear Renee:
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is requesting information concerning the potential presence of historic,
cultural, and/or archeological sites on or near the above -referenced parcel (hereafter referred to as the
"Site'). This request is submitted to satisfy a Federal/State 404/401 wetland permitting action. This
request is not being submitted due to the use of Federal funds.
The Site consists of one tax parcel totaling approximately 85 acres of land (Martin County Parcel
90100324) located southwest of the intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64 in Jamesville, Martin
County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site; see Figure 1). The Site consists primarily of agricultural
land and undeveloped wooded land. Surrounding properties include light industrial facilities to the north,
single-family residential and vacant undeveloped land to the east, vacant undeveloped land to the south,
and agricuhural land to the west and south. Representative Site photos are attached to this letter.
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
March 15, 2017
Page 2 of 3
In order to investigate the potential presence of historic, cultural and/or archeological sites on the Site,
H&H conducted the following:
• reviewed the National Registry of Historic Places (NRNP) and the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (NC SHPO) geographic information system (GIS) viewer for sites located in
Martin County, North Carolina;
• conducted a visual survey of the Site and the surrounding area; and
• reviewed the Martin County property record for the Site.
National Registry of Historical Places & North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
H&H reviewed the NRHP website(httpJ/nationaIregisterofhistoricplaces.com/NC/martin/state.html) and
the NC SHPO GIS viewer (httpJ/gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb� to obtain information and locations of historic,
cultural, and/or archeological sites on or adjacent to the subject Site.
Based upon our review of these websites, H&H did not identify historic, cultural, and/or archeological
sites on or adjacent to the Site.
Visual Survey
H&H conducted a visual survey of the Site and nearby properties while conducting wetland survey
activities. H&H identified several structures located in the central and southeastern portions of the Site
that appeared to be associated with the agricultural use. H&H did not observe structures or ruins on the
property that appear to be historically, culturally, and/or archeologically significant.
Martin County Property Record
According to the Martin County GIS website, a tobacco barn and shed exist on -Site; however, additional
details regarding the structures are not provided on the property record card. Property details are included
within the attachments.
hart '''14 hickman
SMARTER EWROMACKTAI SOLUTIONS
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy I (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\Agency Letters\SHPO Letter doc

Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
March 15, 2017
Page 3 of 3
Please review the above information and provide a written response as to the potential for this proposed
development to affect historic, cultural, or recorded archeological sites. If possible, please respond to this
request within 30 days. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Iler
Matt Ingalls
Project Manager
Attachments
Danielle Birmingham
Assistant Project Environmental Scientist
10
hart "' hickman
SMARTER EN VIRONVENTAL SOLUTIONS
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Sun Energy 1 (SEO)\SEO-002\Site 4 Mill Pond Rd\Agency Letters\SHPO Letter dm

APPROXIMATE
qN
0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
PLYMOUTH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1998
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
MILL POND ROAD
JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
hart 0_ h i c k m a n 2923 South North
Street -Suite 100
Chadotre, North Carolina 282033
704586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (�
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE: 03-15-17 1 REVISION NO: 1
JOB NO: SEO-002 I FIGURE: 1

N
0
0
0
w
U)
? �. 1 .. F" � � � i+...5�S Y✓ yr`". "roR Y' i � t`}tl.y y �y�py��' (.. ?y"l} r -
�.J9t7 A'..14 a .I« —YJ
Photograph 1: Wetland area A located in the western portion of the site.
Photograph 2: Wetland area B located in the western portion of the site.
Id 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart 1 hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
w 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
w
0
Photograph 3: Wetland area C located in the central portion of the site.
Photograph 4: Wetland area D located in the eastern portion of the site.
14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart AD
w hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(1) JAMESVILLEILL POND O
NOR HCAROLINA

(N
0
0
0
LU
V)
Photograph 5: Wetland area E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 6: Wetland area I located in the southwestern portion of the site.
v 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart OND ROAD ► hickman 04.586.0007(p) 704.586.03730 JAMESVIL ECharlotte, NC 28203 MILL PNORTH OCAROLINA

N
0
0
0
W
0
t �
v
r
TF
'9.6
_4".',�Y,vj..
Photograph 7: Wetland area J located in the southwestern portion of the site.
Photograph 8: Wetland soil with low chroma sampled in Wetland Area C located in the central portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart 0_* . hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.03730 JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
LU
U)
Photograph 9: Stream channel A located in the central portion of the site.
Photograph 10: Stream channel B located in the western portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart AD ► hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.03730 JAMESVILLEPNORTH HOND OCAROLINA

COUNTY: MARTIN
NURTH C:AXVL1NA 15TATk C L :AkC1NCsHUUSL
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
H11: ENERGY RELATEL
FACILITIES/ACTIVITIEZ
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CC&PS DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DENR - COASTAL MGT
DENF. LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
MID EAST COMMISSION
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Commerce
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
Environmental Review
q1(' 4
STATE NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED: 06 `x2:'::014
AGENCY RESPONSE: 09 l" 2G 14
REVIEW CLOSED: 09t22,'2G14
s
'4
--/Y
DESC: Application of Mill Pond Solar, LLC for Certificate to construct a 5 Moe Solar
Photovoltaic Electric Generating Facility in Martir. Co. Docket #SP -9061, Sub C. -
View document at
http:r'`/starwi.ncuc.ne-,/NCUC,°portal,encu,,,'pagelDc.cketsliportal.asox, Type SP -4061.
Sub 0 in the Docket Number search line.
Located at the corner of Mil'_ Pond Road and Hwy 64, Jamesville, NC
The attached project has been submitted tc the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1-301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, rlease contact this office at (9;.9)80`-2425.
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: R NO COMMENT [7 COMMENTS ATTACHEr
SIGNED BY:
DATE: L7. /� ./
SEP 0 2 2014

Appendix E
Jurisdictional Determination Request
hart hickman
SMARTER EWOMMENTAL SOLUMNS

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Q
US Army Corps
of Engineers
wwr,gor, D ,Ino
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: llttp:/iwX�,\.saw.Lisace.armv.mil Missions/Re,,ulatorvPermitPrc)gram.aspx . by
telephoning: 910-251-4633. or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGL L.ATORI' FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton avenue, Room 208
Asheville. North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: (8.28) 27) -7980
Fax Number: t828) 281-8120
RALEIGH REGULATORI FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive. Suite 105
\take Forest. North Carolina 37587
General dumber: [phone]
Fax Number: (9 19) 562-0421
N'ASHING'f0` REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 west Fifth Street
washinston.'North Carolina 37889
General Number: 1910) 251-4610
Fax dumber: 135_'1975-1 399
N ILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmineton. North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: (9101 251-4035
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: if you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service. prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64
City, State: Jamesville. NC
County: Martin
Directions: From 1-40E, take exit 289 to merge onto 1-440E From 1-440E, take exit 14 to merge onto US -64E
Take exit 515 to merge onto US -64E Continue approx. 16 miles to turn right onto Mill Pond Road,
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1 0100324
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
Matt Ingalls
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 Charlotte, NC 28023
704-586-0007
[e-mail]
Select one:
FI am the current property owner.
77 1 am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'`
F-1 Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
F] Other., please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: 3
Electronic Mail Address
Seth A. Davis Heirs c/o, William L. Davis
5770 Regents Village Dr.
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
7 Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
If available
Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
if available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
` 5
Property Owner (please print)
`Z
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISI)ICTIONAL DETERIM NiMON TYPE
Select One:
3'
Date
I azn rcqucstin g tIxat the Corps provide a prelin,biar JD for the property identiiicd'herein.
This request does include a delineation,
I atn requesting til<lt the Corps pro;ridea preliininar�t JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
1 ani requesting that tine Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WotJSS and provide ati ap roved JD for the property identified herein. his
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am rcquesti!ig that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoU5 on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD ("his may or may not include a survey plat),
I atn requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve; a delineation of WoUS (cond(tcted
by others) on a property/project area and provide aIIapproyed JD (may or may not
inehide a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
ZMap of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
0 Size of Property or Project Area 85
acres
III verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form`'.
Project Coordinates: 35.826323 Latitude -76,790908 Longitude
Maps (no larger than I I x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
7 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
W] Aerial Photography of the project area
7 USES Topographic Map
Fv4 Soil Survey Map
FVIOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LfDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
WOPNOWN-M-N-OFFM
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)':
Wetlands:
0 Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets F-1 Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Landscape Photos, if taken
571 Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
LJ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
F❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps., as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan.
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http:llwww.usace.army.milJMissions/CivilWorks/RexulatoryProgramandPerrnitslreg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.orgLdocument library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http:lLwww.saw,usace.army.mil/Portals1591docs/regulatorylpubiicnotices/2013INCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.odf
S Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets`'
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos. if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency. etc. to navigable waters.
4 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
1. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than I I "x 17 ­
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than I I "x 17". may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
F] Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoLIS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
0 Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
comer, USGS monument)
F-1 When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F] When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or suneyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
F-Iall depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands". "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
0 When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
'This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (S) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action 1D No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1487 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property comer, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
F] include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Agent Certification of Authorization
I, K 1 4 �12tj'I , representing the prospective developer of Parcel
0100324 which is located at the intersection of Mill Pond Road and Highway 64 in
.Jamesville, Martin County, NC (approx. 8S acres), certify that I have authorized Hart
& Hickman, PC to act on prospective developer's behalf and take all actions
necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination and 401/404 permitting for this property.
Prospective Developer's Signature
Name/Title: GrtV 14,OY , &,v. P��ra�. M0a1er
Company: Sum F -r4 o,c I- , 4 -c -c—
3 cul, -�-
Date
own
Agent's Signature
Matt Ingalls
Hart & Hickman, PC
3/22/17
Date

Property Location: Residential Property Record Card - Martin Co - 2017
1196 Mill Pond Rd Account: 0100324 Map Block No: 6880
... .., ...... .........�., ., Miscellaneous
Davis, Seth A Heirs Name__ Deed Date Deed Info: X-7/156.02/01/1966
C/O William L Davis Zoning:
5770 Regents Village Dr Routing No: 6756-42-6996
Winston-Salem Nc 27103 Neighborhd: 101
Living Units: 77
-Census Trct: 2203
Notes Entrance Information
-- --------- District: 0
Jones Us Hwy 64 & Mill Pond Rd Date Time ID Actv Entrance Code Source
- Estimates
06/22/2000 00 Entry MRA:
03/13/2008 28 Entry + Sign Weighted:
A Entry + Sign Market:
Sates History
Book/Page Date Price Type Validity
Total Acres for this Parcel 85 Total Land Value
Out Building Information
le Qty Year Size1 Size2 Grade Cond %Good
209,000
I
Value
Class: A State Class: 199 Card 1 of 1
Assessment Information
Appraised Value: Prior
Land: 52,723 49,918
Building: 980 930
Total: 53,703 50,848
Assessed Information:
Code: Value:
Tobacco Barn
1
Permit Information
0
0 E P 10%
Date
Permit #
Price Purpose
0
% Comp.
12/21/2015
11560
9,500,000 Ck For Solar Fa
0
0
0
0 0%
0
0
0
0
Land Information
0
Type
Size
Grade Influence Factor 1, 2 and %
0 0%
Value
Site Open La
A 4
10 Aa
0
32,000
Open Land
A 29.5
10 Aa
0
71,820
Open Land
A 13
10 Excessive Fr Aa
0
36,140
Woodland
A 38.5
80 Wa
0
69,040
Total Acres for this Parcel 85 Total Land Value
Out Building Information
le Qty Year Size1 Size2 Grade Cond %Good
209,000
I
Value
Class: A State Class: 199 Card 1 of 1
Assessment Information
Appraised Value: Prior
Land: 52,723 49,918
Building: 980 930
Total: 53,703 50,848
Assessed Information:
Code: Value:
Tobacco Barn
1
0
0
0 E P 10%
0
Shed -Frame
1
0
1
928 E P 0%
980
0
0
0
0 0%
0
0
0
0
0 0%
0
0
0
0
0 0%
0
0
0
0
0 0%
0
0
0
0
0 0%
0 No Picture Available
0
0
Total OBY for this card
980 Inspection witness by:
.'
%*.% Univers
Printed Tue, Dec 13, 2016
* (7.5.66 i6)
Effective DOV. 1/1/2017
Value Flag: FARM USE
Manual Override Reason:
UPDATE

Property Location:
1196 Mill Pond Rd
Dwelling Information
Style:
Low 1st 2nd 3rd Tot
Condo Style:
0
Exterior Walls:
None
Story Height:
0.0
Attic:
0
Interior/Exterior:
0
Basement:
None
Bsmt Garage:
0
Rec Room size:
0 0
FBLA size:
0 0
Unfinished Area:
0
Inlaw Apts:
0
WB Fireplace:
Stacks 0 Openings 0
MTL Fireplace:
Stacks 0 Openings 0
Heating Type:
0
Fuel:
0
Heating System:
0.00
Year Built:
0
Eff. Yr Built:
0
GFA/True GFA:
0 0
TLA/True TLA:
0 0
Basement Area:
0
Grade:
Condition:
CDU:
Building Notes:
Residential Property Recc
Account: 0100324
Replacement Costs
Base Price:
Low 1st 2nd 3rd Tot
Rooms:
0
0
0
0
0
Bedrooms:
0
0
0
0
0
Full Baths:
0
0
0
0
0
Half Baths:
0
0
0
0
0
Add? Fixtures:
1 0
0
0
0
0
Residential Property Recc
Account: 0100324
Replacement Costs
Base Price:
0
Additions:
0
Unfinished Area:
0
Basement:
0
Attic:
0
Plumbing:
0
Heating A/C Adj.:
0
FBLA:
0
Rec Room:
0
Fire Place:
0
Basement Garage:
0
Exterior Trim:
0
Subtotal:
0
Grade Factor:
0.00
C & D Factor.
0.00
Total RCN:
0
Percent Good:
0.00
Market Adj.:
0.00
Total RCNLD:
0
Addition Information
Low 1st 2nd 3rd Area Points
Location
,rd Card - Martin Co - 2017
Map Block No: 6880
Class: A State Class: 199 Card 1 of 1
0
OwnerlValues: Includes all Land/BuildingslOBYs for this Parcel
0
0
Current
Cost
Market
Income
0
Land:
52,723
209,000
0
0
0
Building:
980
980
0
0
0
Total:
53,703
209,980
0
0
Comparable Sales Summary
Year
Bed- Bath
DOS
Price
TLA Style
Grade built
room Full Half
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Descriptor/Area
Prior
49,918
930
50,848
Acres
0
0
0
0
0

APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
PLYMOUTH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1998
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROJECT
85 -ACRE PROPERTY
MILL POND ROAD
JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
hart
h i c k m a n 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 1 OC
`
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (1)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
DATE:
03-15-17
REVISION NO: 1
JOB NO:
SEO-002
FIGURE: 1

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): October
2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Attn: Matt Ingalls, Hart & Hickman,
PC, 2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28203.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, file name and number to be determined
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Martin City: Jamesville
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.826323°, Long. -76.790908°.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Welch Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 531 linear feet
Cowardin Class: R4SB
Stream Flow: Intermittent and ephemeral/intermittent
Wetlands: 2.279 acres
Cowardin Class: PFO1 G
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIES):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit
applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby
made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD
could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any
form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on
the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal
court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as
is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal,
jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make
an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters
on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic
features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case
file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Preliminary Wetland Survey Sketch
prepared by Hart & Hickman, PC, and dated January 1, 2016. Mill Pond JD Feature Map, prepared by SunEnergyl, LLC,
and dated March 10, 2017.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Plymouth West, 1998, 1:24,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey Version 3. 1, October 19,
2015.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: October 19, 2015.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Map Number 3720675600J, effective September 19, 2007.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Preliminary Wetland Survey Sketch prepared by Hart & Hickman, PC, and
dated January 1, 2016.
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site Photos 85 -Acre Property Mill Pond Road 10/10/15 & 10/11/15.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should
not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
2
See JD Request Form
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
Impracticable)

SEO-002 Intersection of Mill Pond Road & HiLFhwav 64 Jamesville. NC
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Class n
Class
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Class resource aquatic
ce
A
35.826499
-76.792435
PFO1G
0.368 acre
Forested Wetland
B
35.825972
-76.793567
PFO1G
0.018 acre
Forested Wetland
C
35.826396
-76.791733
PFO1G
0.282 acre
Forested Wetland
D
35.825737
-76.789977
PFO1G
0.962 acre
Forested Wetland
E
35.825095
-76.790247
PFO1G
0.213 acre
Forested Wetland
1
35.824484
-76.793343
PFO1G
0.112 acre
Forested Wetland
J
35.822359
-76.793097
PFO1G
0.324 acre
Forested Wetland
SCA
35.826643
-76.792473
R4SB
151 LF
Intermittent Stream
SCB
35.826165
-76.793374
R4SB
259 LF
Ephemeral/Intermittent
Stream
SCE
35.824675
-76.789771
R4SB
121 LF
Ephemeral/Intermittent
Stream
SWA
35.822343
76.792879
PUB4
0.076 acre
Surface Water

35° 49 54" N
35° 49' 12" N
3 Soil Map—Martin County, North Carolina, and Washington County, North Carolina 3
h V
V
QQ 35° 49154'N
yK�Q
i1S
M
In
337800 337900 338000 338100 338200 338300 338400
3
Map Sole: 1:6,300 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
e Meters
NN 0 50 100 200 300
/V00
0 300 600 1200 1800
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
338500 338600
Ln
Ln
M
350 49' 17' N
338700
3
F
a
10/19/2015
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Martin County, North Carolina, and Washington County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (A01)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
.,..r
Soil Map Unit Lines
C3
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Wj
Blowout
0
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
"
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
> Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
+_" Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
0 Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Martin County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 13, 2014
Soil Survey Area: Washington County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 13, 2014
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with
a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels
of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area
boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 9, 2010—Apr 17,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/19/2015
"i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Martin County, North Carolina, and Washington County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Martin County, North Carolina (NC117)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BOB
Bonneau loamy sand, 0 to 6
81.1
52.2%
percent slopes
BoC
Bonneau loamy sand, 6 to 12
24.5
15.8%
percent slopes
CrB
Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 4
2.71
1.7%
percent slopes
Do
-t - --
Dorovan muck, frequently 1
14.21
9.2%
flooded
GOA
Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to
20.3
13.1%
2 percent slopes
NoA
Norfolk loamy fine sand, 0 to 2
3.2
2.0%
I percent slopes
_
WnD
_
Winton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15
9.2
5.9%
percent slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
155.0 i
99.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
155.3
100.0%
Washington County, North Carolina (NC187)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Do Dorovan muck
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
Totals for Area of Interest
0.3
0.3
155.3
0.2%
0.2%
100.0% I
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/19/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

ns+stavr�t� naarr:
86fl4'Air`E
S. Fish and
National
Wildlife Service
Wetlands
Inventory
Oct 19, 2015
Wetlands
w
�
w�
Freshwater Emergent
- Freshwater Forested/Shrub
_ Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
RiverMe
- Other
r
500 m
A
r
ft
�'
This map is for general reference only.
responsible for the accuracy or currentness
The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not
of the base data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used in
accordance with the layer metadata found on
User Remarks:
the Wetlands Mapper web site.

\ 5'
PEROU14MANS
MATTE �,, I' J. _ 9
OATUM INFORMATION
iM1n yq.cdpn +raa T
I . Rp srn h a I— a,p +» en Nra Crap» SUN
P— i FIP52UNF 3•X0, Th, h-.." dMMn rM mr Nalh Arirw .An D_.?
7'S43 CASHC nnFnVa 004', w n daaum rlbaod Pal +bis o W+vlifal
Trruvasp A«inrara zPNF wrn n EN PI p _ d FIRMS b pdFasNe
NrntlraFna mar ywE n NW F'pFalari
dor—
FIRM
or— vs Nspa.a Aaala
FARC nr eWbaroa ilw. OAtrarxeF dp IrM r/I.) d,e Ke✓ECy a cob
fILI MS AAwh.p
U wadiMN« m si«. map sn r U S SF
U .eNn
s S twavh FN='2G?i�A.'17 MHN«
Fbpd .N. a, ihr« m . iMNpxad b top Nom ATNKan Nrerai
Drkmd iSYla IN= Mf i)gae fbOp WnM4M — a Gpnp M WtcssM
av Ao.N ere era .era <na ry uq — —..d damn M wrrege bNe
mwv, .AVD at ri 4e NrerW GpodMe Srartrdl 0M d 1929 iNUVD ml
M peN• :cnRAW iti u[n Nome DadsN CaN 1 Tln aRSM +s bn pprea
b pse N>W :5 h eb.tevn I r're rc/ ty IrI OI w Vr OM a EN
sraMne ramp
FIRM 7M o~ Ke usN a I Eben m dip FIRM I p'.
rir:sn+ WeN Iaab r. % V11eae a d4u'a'« haii^darY
aar:wma + eb✓^. uawged IIId 2S wood .r&dov a wec,eaF.
rq•.><h»' I.,N n 6 GrWn rrluAese6 W ,psAad tYYaq dr, F— k d dm
amwge bma FyIM SM Spcepn 51 a lir au'/mw4F4 food Irararap
I `apul m p1a VD 2 To
I—I pn sr aon+.ruon a ar.aNPp
gasAgpn MN/D 5e rid NOVO 29 Ta puns Wnra .brMErr MantEAn. arwar
4fR.on apamMF]n b bsgli Rlaree erioaer an n.. nwp onasp n•ao m.
Nam CroFN CHgwlc S.nvsrr r IM e•awn wap Yoa •rsar alp
1134 top e+lamrgn SNrAra Ba—t a d» Nr4W G_5ihay M (7571
717.1247 a -rpn na rReaN m trop. _+„yw. riSa row.Qw.
tfprm CasaArM Ga00e]K Saeh Cwu A- uMtKM ORFM T,de
iz1
Rabo c 2 sa.M
FaC:7eoi 'c
191977713x76
!SSEL.._ r!99taffi ��
Aa Nar•i« bNd n W pww "a—d 6r. T bk brow inn spdbd El OlsaaFa
.pa!Igda brr'9 AaM Fwvh Orr Rodd frrd dlEa emacs an w mh
» an awnA Tariq Mqi a NNMt aarNM P mind dMasFd RrvaeN
aaMY41 Man aaznraF<n m hh AOpdarx apr,Eaa alsdw by d4Fp aivwFal b
ar+vend n M4 iFspp M«rao Spey i,pFFI
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE ierRPa rico wan
Fai Urara 9arrsn
oN. «bN aalia9l I]mrr.r t7aa.de.a epFd.v
]:+eror �""YNo` Ia.r Ar-snr.. ra.ao rt +ER awnN.re
C,at N«+RF rTW woadrN YAlirr
ROANWEE
RIVLYt
AAff
auP`
555 55.250' 51005
66
9.5W, tA67
vMCH LANK
136 17,750' I NA
1 67
1 134
173 17 276' NA
ll'
ADI
735 23,51✓ NA
a r'
foe
WELCH CREEK MOUTARY
Ota �t4UD'^ NA
67
269
ars Szn' NA
e r
rte
Far14 A4cr, G.N
NlaaweFU.<M
Ebrabn+,cFFbl Oriwrr rra<M r.m•AEriEi»sa«e
,_ %F71 �,711 11,11, - 1: _1 .-I It", (1-91
Th. F R FIRM
a+od Inver ata
Map 1 1 T I
dura aaax+q n -corp.«
4 eonwq,n 114 Geo 1 s
$ No h d•
aoapp pangrsnrp crib - 14 ndi,rr
En.ryPrary tianay. t Ay y tFEFaA rn swm or «rrtn r w:
con t d Ia. I. man'
atE+M cry PR i•oda munay 1 0 d...> ra ma
costs b a wa nritxfi ro ih 1 dp al a0 DY m S aa' cur. nx(9 m
Row as i m b l k ry As t nr fr< ed ]
Rsap — a pa s « ire Iiab d NOM
Cid✓ ' nd. ¢a M to 3 C... %Is Ot ro iaTnrc:-"+I SI.tt9 ,kpaprmN eMs FEMA to
Pwvct ib iun.es ]M1 •: Mpn;r i kl.r
www ncfloodmaos.com
'rota
WN
MIR
,MMM A
FROM WELCH CREEK W w t
M«EC'
we A
TM cop n la uai n Mnu(aaarary d'a Nappra IboO mapriee Rro¢ar4 It Gaal M rraeiaap�e/
Bran N Fres tup.c n neoaq 1r+neMrM Nab Ger aaa.9. ForF»a a Fm4a uF. i*a
paenlrri7lY FIy npNlbrY albtN b CabJbd b OONrW uWaba HdWrYr Fw0 NCY9
e.amNm
is mran mon eeMiiea rdRmnar ui avpa wewa 6aN FbW EIFu 6f E+i tlaeMya
na» Wen MlMm+rwt uFN. ae..Maaap.d N rnn4A M Flaw Noir» iYMw Y '+n mnN
D.Naa Fiooa rvara Mr. FCMM s..pm'ry d sMlraN tNrrFnF iaual :xda,wa wc4n rr. Frr„a
Fra 51uro1:Fr5}rCpodUWF LaraeMMM uNn rrourdW Aare dib OSEaMWrier.
hf�RN+p+eMnf ratbatl crab n,vr Wynra TNN6FEa r. Y,rbeabboamLa'O ravp
Rapew a+i � «nx.ra jai a rrxa n rca apo Fswn a m>A awWm oeurnabm Amaanpry
noao a.awrwn par rarrAO W MtM rara+a2.T iM Y b
puri✓.,« 'ea anp .nq iNapa^erY
DOFFNt w Fbod EbnFpar Ru.,an n pYe. N A m.
npa.
W Tn M h,
mb-
ngLwn
O!pW eatz E a.'rarrF �>. Sur ry G S its L aMe strxlG W W
am lboq r, rzrroF.�ni wmiae+.+»rmrr re myw <n,� re arm.:+ v+ow�.
NOTES TO USERS
6nmoarvs N n9u41pY doodMya Fegrn p+ ne FIpM Ia .x , FONrYF eW T aY dared
meFrWr was +b•WNM Fr aoFF ar]t'nF aq nle•adand e»e'Fa^ float aa<aMF M Mode'ait
.... WFN ma4N a .Fina mod '.
M1YawJ w+in •Fpaa b n�xa•.a M
mop.myFow oma rro rooaa lir« to now aw•>.a R..a.d ama:ee
wmr.rr r rb av
ape,an w.a NR!p<IMM'E i+/,eb #w now+g lou rmidNon ba ar4M0
r Ro.raea • tea. SwY («r51 rapnt b f r S rnpv,
p a>wYf matnrJ fa ae.N, ma>p a aoaMW nnx,q nm..awm lmaT wW0'+ be Krr4np
avre eWapd Y1.mWn atrbd m.mwa
CmRn av+rrdn SpK,N Fbod Hazra 0.'W rs.syNR<•xbdo 6.ed <NNd.411Cdna Hee:
b Sacam F a'Rbpt p•Na[h+, 4Ma.re� d to Fava '.w.e•vr 5aer spot Ipi mb+nFw'n m rad
N Tru faVtAnM n AI
,eaNR
YaN niap eda}parq rq pEr.u{rEfr to uN P tM F RM wa,e sax
a9artm+w.. aLigeg era pavpe«rq mx:11 <,.* w , ran aro+aNr pa+.un
TM r o,i+ W V2M .sad o wa sn <
R may M 1 nnrNY 7
ti M f Y]C T
Lwa Mab• CsiWna penes a art torr« .n
cr'oa a mseamn m'iq Sue a •mm ..arasw +repay « =vY r:wmsm�re «W 9e<papr arae
na ioui <onena.wr«i Lae n.n iFMa W+e cop sw�r.-ma,« .«e ,awma] ne
Rearva .ar-wax>wpmanrada n.i, •ao se. roapxw r-euvU]P +,. u..»aroa.vau
M b .eea�a.r«.•nNon Feor,i W«e cop n.Pra++m
Bpa mbr fearun Orovrn m ru.F cop eun n oapeeaN ane. re Nlea n ab moll rPbarF
ao a.aFFeb x ae+r,e a amens: UbFn9FF m NN <.nas IYii11F very Nlv,,aapru FNw
er(a ,Tap wa ppaaFRM Mp uFFn ✓sorb <ara, F<p. +ta .Pnmiwy oaar a Mab b
»rn <v'nn ,aMira•t d t tmY wwn .p turn« M map maC Galan
roFG tut wan na nvraaaad n.rr n,aavicr rF J irrn'n +a.nw nrdnWcmadr w.
xwNi Ownp ex pca.zaar a W+ uadwge w r N.M
]np map rMa:e mar deu+ri r.d -.n m. cols .aa.n <nnrin.r caMrrgna mo, In,N F14en m
me aaMi.p F RM Av clan FNm+darr t W FxUdonM aha noa]w -t lhW Eda enFNmd +rC✓n M
a ctRM mW N»oMn a�kxaa b,mlambJ,aw .nen eomm:.+r4'rgl cRdgxnmp 4t
a•e me Fqw Pra»F W Fs,odwaY Dab taNa. m .ta Flow :n an<a Sarr npan teept
» •,drFuc o,U:. mh vara arum drr+W paN ��.: .n.t an. «a,+ eve n
Mau. coli cop
NF,N nN «ei Fr^r a wp Na xr an o,rr,Nw maga mF-mr,rxr to -*w m* armA
N my Kin ,vt.. r pc aafmFan .aro a CNeg a Comrmrmtn+
urvrg
H.aa«:4;F :v ...a e«mr ea<n nMFna dine rap �>, .+vcFr
esin ym.,,r.,tr..,s malar rap. m,anwnr rNr*9 p
a tu» nsRNbwE UI -dW(I 4n
UIS pNlc FSwp InE—
w per.sr p..N m 1 - m -peau MAp n.ens7a.ezr xFA tq F Alii wreeN a
nM ire: r.NRa wt
ax
m
M rsarpmtvy Fbop irvpraar SwCF repx, L.nler d Flap RasrFgn LL02 a i,el.• N Mp
M'!'«Y'•er'i i'_nMkt Mrtw9 paum+a VW prw aeq epni ».le"a a to fIPN may W a+Wape
VUA W M Mb A•,w
Naini tarsal✓ ..eN.
Flepppbb �jt}s/f'
_ wpwg Rratran
as R+ FEMA sarp xFnp Cant« x s-0pO3S6N:
4GC v s+orma r«�
proO. YF a+apiuNd wr]n Ma FIRM ins FEW tlaD FtMi. ra mW e4ne W
F n a f npo.}Sn96:0 N b r+.aa4 aFew, %'r`EAX.!ItFGt!^IAA9!f
Rao. bFaipaFbp Rpamm m Mpegnv »F
Ei:KTNE LlA7E OF RQ•sO I.SURANCE RATE YAP PANEI
SE EMBEa sr. 2igi
EFFECTNE MTEIS) DF REYtSICNiSI TO TMS FA.tt
coven cop nnvm M < Mp nNnY ex«e uervF
�'u f ry � .« s w nwr.:rn veru ..u... nyy Prm avers n
E.C\Dcnv
SPECIAL FLOW NAZARO AREAS (SFHAS) SUOMCT tO
INUNDATION BY iNE 1% ANNUAL ODUICE FLOOD
n1E I%,rood CAars(e Ito[•1 t ta@ Yar mmL Mm Y iiYn 6 a! ONE 11Li w M a0E9 OIM
nn , Ix nsAap a tag efb, a a eewdat n arq FFrtw rpa Tae Sirasll teen wrrd
n tM .«a aARat 1,rbodrg a tm Ia rFayd aMar: mod Nan d Sa1u0 lbad
iiNrp arfrrdl• Z(Irt!f A, FE b.. AD, M. A99, V, rd VE tm Gee Igod EA•.,ppn a dq
,elrrr+wllce Aevaeer d tx r'c aNW <Aa[e Rodd
ZONE AW b.rrr• Rai+i Eb I I dMaraRtd
ZONE AZP.bv FYpd EearorS to de .d
MIN& AN rWN aaan d t m I met ItFtrrFN Area d parbk 6,ae Flxd tbrrFpe
nelnrnri.e
ZONE AO ibru Gears d t N I A- (.ip•sAr urs 5 n *pig I . rmT
deplR dn«miiaed to MWs d ,Nnrr Fn ma7aq. vdlpopes ado
a.>,r�nrni
9.1 M 5pn.s« lw RR.. Ame n ma+w aNphit han de .1 r III—
M1av] W a hqd caWd IYstem ihi vas wesapa_nt L «t N
evaca'es t1kY dq tmntr mal came sNem i bR” I erg reu,,aM m pd10E
Ra.nar� niFn v: Ix emWi inrxe a pane dcaa
11 All 4eUr m ce Rdeititt han 1«k aragat i]iaa'e mod a . Faiad mod
aia<rtn� «rw.n •nae• ia,micep: ro SFte Iatpd Maaart dirpinn.t
Z—f ME rn.va mtfd eme nM +d<aIr tierce (Mn aaprr, E.E rtoai [braaona
dianinea
FYOODWAY AREAS IN DDNE AE
Tiq maapr n dN cora✓ V. t em r , p9r[ ftwotar car esM raid a s>A
,ae a eno<wnbR p ma ft,M Alward rtwre r.RJ Fan ce lined aMra4 NaeaEW
FrrNMa n p w bgM
OTTER FLOOD AREAS
mix Ar d 5 2% — clwue ftw — d 11% ra,.d Nree Ncd erM
—W depdp d w din I teat a Mn &-W ram to Gin 1 tyre
mr: w ams p<AaAed w FlnatRMF Ia aFlr wa. root.
OTHER AREAS
XWR—apa�+.n,>N�.e«arMdn Ger✓dir«.neoNFr...
ZONRO 4eea EnC ^am nNa 4e ria�nprM.uwWN
® a ASTAL BARRIER RLSOtWn SYSTEM COWS) AREAS
01IERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
CRS rE,S an0 Olas r!pailW7 Wa"d MIn a A%a m SWIM Find Nipd Arcot
FR aMW <neru pa4iNrn Wurrirry
.__._..______..... 02+reu«•iimcr4 YvwR'uwary
..................••• CRSNOAOu+iErl
E1Mtllrr a.•agiba0 .Ye�vd9 4m Frs Mp ra Oweprl
513
�':• `�°°,w°"'"^'" nor �wncrc«vm•a..,.-.cm.d dlre,I r. rom
iE: EF/i Nv Fp«E NI.b+.•. w wren .m«im arse rra a,epN s
tn•
• rehear b vq wea 4.er.r'ctw c a IYl1
a_........ _ ...n ICrrgt 4n
V, raapane <pra.,ia raamaa q w rNa 4n.on pba. a
«, fi _..v IpiprOW
Q'S•" tabpear u+.e.b..eEa..buv ra Rat met,
part bpa FEEt 2'ADfpa rd+iAR: sbm C,rtpSae «tan mvpasN+eprn
Plat2dle >as, sIw ra.e wa,t iptt
OMSStO ram �aNe s,rvW pe.n mNrc ab roe .,nniinn
M!Sm.:,AEa �YRL1KN1
87A55f0a .rtiP.0 rw.a+w 5u ei.v* nr.« �b +pa •arrn«rar .r
'rM�':nwn/aYaOY«LI
ersU :n s5 w. wrwi rob. w+a a::aawvrer,wnc
8tA55t0O � .nsaFs�rA] Ib we .a•,Rv w
R Mt 5 eea w4
-.01111-
111
CRD NORTH
AP
Msae t•
t.5W'(1 5.6951
'' IAYIl�Itt:J!i PANEL 6766.1
•
FIRM
FWW INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 6756
dtC i.T""«:r,w pw.t«M:ra .✓ •f.' • • ro r wn.•hl r
W:A n
iEEIMiS
GpOµlReShc.T7 GdtlR Tm 141ST*
- aaq„rEr,
EFFECTN A
E DATE
.rnp.r
MAP NUMBER
SEPTEMBER I 92007 3720675600.1
AAff
auP`
� Stlda l.Y Nixih L�Mvirtm

10
IG��
o - _ 760• Y
Raw) �4
rn `off
ON
co Q1011
S 69' 15'21 "E -
�� 101.73'
CV
68'35' 18"E 74.78'
0� 7 — 34'07'28"E 82.77'
h NN -
r� �0,
_ h
co S 03'3516'YV 73.33'
C0 06'36'12"W 163.47'
S 00'03'26"E 32.01' _
' 88'34'31'W 30.01'
Cyl
'^
o -
� v Cy
r
f'1 -
J
r
- o
ETLAND A
7 STREAM B STREAM A WETLAND C �
N _ S 01'49'37"E 64.22'
n
02'40'16"W 44.74'
ETLAND B - S 0723'35'W 44.67
zbr
S 1028'58W 47.20'
z - COLLAPSED 24" CMP .: 14.29'32"W 47.44'
o - ® WETLAND D
17'33'19"W 48.41'
19'44'56"W 43.79'
23'24'35"W 45.57'
STREAM E:- 24'17'03"W 75.60'
_ 18'46'34"W 76.81' WETLAND DATA POINT TABLE
,W45'00'28'V
ETLAND E - 6' 7.51' DATA POINT LATITUDE LONGITUDE
_ W 3 30.300.30' '
76'52'42'YV 38.74' WETLAND A 35.826499 -76792435
22'46'09"W 71.28' WETLAND B 35.82597214 -76.79356766
- 26'30'51 WETLAND C 35.82639636 -76.7917332
-_ 26'07'50"EE 622.98.98''
WETLAND D 35.82573756 -76.78997779
- WETLAND E 35.825095 -76.79024758
WETLAND I - 11'48'15"E 148.66' WETLAND 1 35.82448432 -76.79334374
WETLAND J 35.822359 -76.793097
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES
-.-r• S 37'00'18"E 103.68' FEATURE NAME AREA (ACRES) FEATURE NAME LENGHT (FT)
_ WETLAND A 0.36818 STREAM A 151
42'53'04"EE 4 46.21'
- S o5'08'48"E WETLAND B 0.01765 STREAM B 259
6.2
- - S 54'32'33"E 47.99' WETLAND C 0.28184 STREAM E 121
" — 12'38'42"E 24.01' WETLAND D 0.96247
WETLAND E 0.21320
_ - 12'37'06"W 102.54' WETLAND I 0.11217
- WETLAND J 0.32383
_ - TOTAL WETLAND 2.27934
SWA 0.07569 TOTAL CHANNEL 531
WETLAND J S 03'16'11"W 227.25'
- MAP LEGEND
EXISTING PATH
® - iN RIGHT-OF-WAY
S 52'19'23W 88.54' r0 � �
x ry. c� M0'
•' o° °j,3 JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND FEATURE
ro
URFACE WATER AREA A (SWA) S 68'36'33"W 185.66' ry� yry JURISDICTIONAL SURFACE WATER FEATURE
54•,W ry JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
_ a • ca't3"W S 7rn�'82' r �' 2 TREE LINE
250 0 250 500 750
GRAPHIC SCALE -FEET
® WETLAND DATA POINT
PROJECT: DATE: 10 MARCH 2017
MILL POND SOLAR, LLC
NOTES:
1. BASE MAP INFORMATION
TITLE:
PROVIDED BY R LAND
MILL POND J D FEATURE MAP
03/29
SURVEYING ON 03/29/16
2. WETLAND DELINEATION PROVIDED
BY HART & HICKMAN, PC ON
SITE ADDRESS: INTERSECTION OF US HWY 64 AND MILL POND RD
10/10/15 AND 10/11/15
JAMESVILLE, NC 27846
3. PARCEL OWNER: WILLIAM L.
SUNENERGYI, LLC
DAVIS AND MARY ELLEN DAVIS
192 RACEWAY DR
ELLIOTT
MOORESVILLE NC 28117
4. PARCEL ID: PORTION OF MARTIN
(T) 704-662-0375
CO NC PARCEL 0100324
(F) 704-662-0352

CC WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: )t_+c - 0nCity/County. Main', ik Sampling Date: I )i lL
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): -y- Section, Township, Range: P l j4 ~L't1N W GS�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): C v�t
xC'aSlope (%): V- 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): t- RR Lat: 35-%01-1(a) Long: 41g. �ZZ ) T? p Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: N V lCht NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil _or Hydrology significantly disturbed? -- Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? N o (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V/ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes 1// No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aoaly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
�[ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
V/High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_, Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
nft Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Geomorphic Position (D2)
_✓✓ Iron Deposits (65) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
nundadon Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
— Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): O % Z
Water Table Present? YesNo
:v
Depth (inches): b 3 s
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes -V/ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. n)A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
I. QcAr 1 110 Fac
2. L ` vi j0,4Cl S�t� r _10 FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
3t� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _} 20% of total cover: (_
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Sa.w,.)P a-- s 10 A C
2.
3.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. a���)��
2. ---- - a 1U r, 10 FA4W
3. SCS: r eTS [n 0 R L
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
Sampling Point: V,,iAA _
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (4_ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of.Dominant Species
That Are O BL, FACW, or FAC: ) I� (AB)
rrevaience inaex woncsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7H rophytic Vegetation indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is _<3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
S� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: ZY 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic J
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the dei
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist) %
(o-1
(D it `-s- 2 (nV
�-►' (0
103 2 1.7 too
�'�
RZ 1 lbro
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
or c
Sampling Point: WAA
of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % T�roe� Loc` Texture Remarks
'Type: C --Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains,
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
44 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
_ Iron -Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (M LRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes If No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: � 'dnL City/County:'0.�IKCSVio / I�arl�►� Sampling Date: I 11 C�
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): -,L U) iV TSR Section, Township, Range: P( N ~Ao W LS'r
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): k� �ISI0 i{ Local relief (concave, convex, none): C6%C'a*# Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L R{Z Lat: 35 .'a7L5 treq 1-14 Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: v.80.J :.Oa S-'V'J NWI classification: { FO I 3
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?/VV Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes 4 No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Al D (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNo within a Watland? Yes 2 No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pripary Indicators ftninimum of one is re uired• check all that a
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (12115) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— /Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_✓Iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
—7—
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
ncludes capillaryfrin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: IAiAB
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations belay).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Qt✓Q A(-40
)
% Cover 'es? Status
Number of Dominant Species
L1_
1 C ^
3o ,r'A!.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
6.
.100
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50°x6 of total cover:
_[ � 20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = g/A=
4
5.
6.
= Total Cover
H dr0phytic Vegetation indicators:
50°x6 of total cover:
20% of total cover:
- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. S f,
)
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7Gtw�bJW �j(�nii5
F$/�
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
10 = Total Cover
Tree –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50°x6 of total cover:
_� 20% of total cover:
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. i -Ark.
t+
Sapling – Woody plants, excluding woody vin as,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub– Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb – All herbaceousnon-woody) ( poly) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
—
2. 081_
3.
4.
5
6.
7,
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine –All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
'"t
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Zb 20% of total cover: 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations belay).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: wP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast) % Color (mast) % Type,Loc` Texture Remarks
6-3 v Q 31'L rt -70
3'tZ Q-371 o q2 313 Zr _ , M
'Type: C=Concentration, D --Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) —
Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
✓Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)- _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochhc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: _ / -001- City/County: ,0.y�LStn/ N� � A Sampling Date: � 11
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point: W AL
Investigator(s): -V-l+JP-AV r`SK Section, Township, Range: P1!4 v --o,4, WG5j
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): : l) Sto .pt Local relief (concave, convex, none):. Slope (%): 6-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat 2�S,�3 %3& Long: -tt'O . -?jP 33 2 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (&L -ca y Loam:: n SA4 NWI classification: �lI F0 % �3 6-
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? N 0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes A/-- No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? N 0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyfic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Priradry Indicators minimum of one is required: check all that a
_ rface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
"arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
igh Water Table (A2) _
Mari Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)/Crr3ajyfish
s Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (81) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)Season
Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Burrows (CO)
�nft Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ turation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Igal Mat or Crust (64) —
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (65) —
Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Shallow Aquitard (03)
laundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
— FAC -Neutral Test (135)
TZWater-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes NoDepth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): %
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):)'/bcS Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(incudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: JpjA6-
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
_% CoverSpecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. b11L
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: 2
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Ja+wi�.7 WS (eVrv►it�SiS FAGw
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50°x6 of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1-:r,41511a IaL i Soli ti I A;r_ 6FId-
2. S t .CVs f- u I y at3L
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
6.
9.
10.
11.
. ./ 3'O =Total Cover
50% of total cover: / \ 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Piot size: )
1. accv4vAl C., $4AVjdj:h5
2.
[6l
4.
5.
Z, = Total Cover
50% of total cover: ID 20% of total cover:
(if
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I D D (A/B)
rrevarenceinoex worKsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hy ophytic Vegetation Indicators:
V- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2�[ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -AII woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to d
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type'Loc'
�- �- 2.5Z10 1042 -
UP -
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervAse noted.)
Sampling Point: W A C,
Indicators.)
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pae Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy
Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_
i'l5epleted Matrix (F3) —
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
— Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 5F0 - dnL City/County: �Q u, / Mart -,k Sampling Date: 1111 r
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point: 1/v�D
Investigator(s): -!L \-)P-AV SK Section, Township, Range: P l N ~AW tsj
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 1n�Lltlt�nt Local relief (concave, convex, none): 60-+c-twt Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l- RR Lat: 315 • `5'.713+5-6 Long: q(o , ?8°1.9,4q-1 6) Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Zd yA11'oa,y , M1&: n -VA\ 4 NWI classification: PF - 0 113 l3
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —Z No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Na Are "Normal Circumstances" present? YesNo
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? ND (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wettand? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PriMory Indicators minimum of one is r
uired: check all that a
rface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (BI 3)p
Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_,,Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
s Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
/—Crryi Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposi{s (B2)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
fish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
VIAlgal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
ron Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
nundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Az Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): O
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): .,-
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): "16 s
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
-Z
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. NA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: lAD
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
Total Number of Dominant 15
Species Across All Strata: - (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /O 0 (A/3)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
ova Species? Status
1.0 �u�f,( sAM•.
0 \/
3 FA 6
-�,--
2.
-ki)_ 7 C,
\�/�
3. �a�a^+J S OUB W�
�t- i 6W
4.
UPL species
5.
Column Totals:
6.
log = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. (JNe c 1,ae>>... �i1w�w�w�
l0 fl OuJ
2
FA L
3.
4.
5.
6.
Tia = Total Cover
50% of total cover: )7)_ 20% of total cover.�L _
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. NA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: lAD
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
Total Number of Dominant 15
Species Across All Strata: - (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: /O 0 (A/3)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
t/2
-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -AJI woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.rjA
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
needed to document the Indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc
/p -tn Q - 2.S -
�n- IDO
'_Type:_ C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sa
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Sampling Point: W A D
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pae Lining, M=Metrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
�lack Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
ydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
—5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
__Yuck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mart (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrclogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
— Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes —r/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: w -00L City/County: �a w ! mW+it Sampling Date: 1111 r
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point: WAA
Investigator(s): -3L W T.AV rSK Section, Township, Range: P 14 ~"t IN W t5j
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): G o\n ca,.h(. Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat 35. $25099- Long: 4t—T1t7Zt' 3r Datum: /
Soil Map Unit Name: CI SAw� NWI classification: _P Py3 G-
I
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?rv0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes —/— No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reautred)
,Prirn6ry Indicators minimum of one is required: check all that a
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_V Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
rsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C I)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Marks (131)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ -Season Water Table (C2)
iment Deposits (6 2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_3Z Pfi Deposits (63)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
gal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 0-ey
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Z
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Welland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA F,
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present?
50% of total cover:
Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Ptf'W r"6ryw.
30 FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
��
z. Lt WAf, 40 �/_ F A &
3
to 1rr OIRL
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ail Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: % a O (AB)
5
6.
90 Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
`! O 20°x6 of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
_
OBL species x 1 =
1.
'10_ F,Q L
FACW species x2=
2
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3
4.
5
6.
1� = Total Cover
phytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
to 20% of total cover:_
710-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
V2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. SAw�tjyLvc cano�lrn�5.�
`'
10 Y �A
TT
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4. -----'Indicators
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Z
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50°x6 of total cover: —�_
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1
Sapling— Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —AM herbaceousnon-woody) ( poly) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
5
6•
7,
8
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present?
50% of total cover:
Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:_
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
3 V5 _LD G '111D,
10
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
lack Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
— Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
oamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mart (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_, Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
ayer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _j.Z_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

C WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: )Fo - 00 City/County:�4I apr't - it Sampling Date: I )! l�
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point: W
investigator(s): -,Lk-,J LAV SR, Section, Township, Range: P I N va. LAs - W Gsf
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 1A i t l A -o .p Local relief (concave, convex, none): WAA W ve Slope (%): -
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): I- P -R Lgat: • 00Z`i b ty Long; Aip r 1 184 bZ`i`i Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: IMV Q S wN NWI classification: re O 113(=
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes Z No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? N 0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pri Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that a
urface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
�_ nft Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Igal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
jSatura6on
Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
!>
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes NoDepth
(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
ncludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. N A
That Are O BL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
1 �3c' J _
2.
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Total Number of Dominant 3
to OQl_
3.
3. .40s
Species Across All Strata: (B)
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
5.
6.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1 F%JA
50% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2.
3
4
5
6'
= Total Cover
phytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.,
_Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
32-
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
Dominance Test is X50%
1. N A
50% of total cover:
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is _<3,0'
Present? Yes No
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Veaetation Strata:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
_— Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum
Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 �3c' J _
2�
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. ` k n
to OQl_
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. .40s
_�/ _
3 a .,I 031
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub—Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
4. T
5.
6•
7
8
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
SID = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. N4
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20"x6 of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
e Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
c)-4 S1 Lt 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Sampling Pant:y�
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Metrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Reduced
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (36)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: SAO -dnL- City/County: �avKr �,1� r / may -t.11 Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: NL Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): -y- k--JP-AV SR, Section, Township, Range: P 1!4 ~ utL, W 151
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �.; ll sl0 6�t Local relief (concave, convex, none): P.c1A W ori Slope (%): O -1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LR P, Let: 3 S • $Z-3 i3 Long: -4G G. -4" S S }-Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: layy i �v L C%An!� S ai/t NWI classification: P t' O 13
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? /VO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? 1442 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pri!pary Indicators minimum of one is re uired• check all that a
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
�parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
/�nft Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
aturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic
✓ Igal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Position (02)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. "
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: _A (7 -
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species
1. 54,111y, V"L: jo,
10 OC3Z
2.
FAC species
3.
FACU species
4.
UPL species
5.
Column Totals:
6.
_?` = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _�_
20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. PjA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. S Qdu , lakIfal�,..
10 t
2. _ S r', r �.> s c,�Mtvws
_
�fl On L
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Q = Total Cover
50% of total cover: ZO 20% of total cover: $_
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. IyA
2.
Percent of Dominant Species J
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
ropnytic Vegetation Indicators:
VRapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Vegetation
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Yes-ZNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color mast %
-�- 6 ��— -lin
(a-1 Z b loo
Sampling Pant: 60c
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
ZHydrogen Sulfide
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Matrix
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
(A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region –Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: )w - 0o City/County: �aw.cs�,Itt . / Mpi+ k Sampling Dale: I 11 L•�
Applicant/Owner: State: N 6 Sampling Point:
vvwrtt (,
Investigator(s): (,1.•1�SK Section, Township. Range: P I N W G5l
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): W �ISIo c.. Local relief (concave, convex, none): C.Wi GG.,rc Slope (%): d' %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lal: � S • Z 2 r-1 1 Long: - +b r ' ' VIS -1,4 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Q V%V%{ct%J vw NWI classification: —PFO 1 3 C7'
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _,Soil_, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes -/— No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrofogy naturally problematic? NU (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Prifty Indicators minimum of one is rewired: check all that apply)
rface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Spa rsely Vegetated Concave Surface (66)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_Water Marks (131)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_. Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)Saturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_lgal
Mat or Crust (84)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
— FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (D6) (LRR T, U)
Feld Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes -V— No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes NoDepth
(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes„ No
(includes capillary fringe)
—
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tr m (Plot si;e: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.wwvPVJtr
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2 -
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. +-'-
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. NA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: _
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.-nAnita tG(fi�'�. �.SL Oral_
2. i f 0 v . t.vt tKr1�7S O i31�
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: y" A 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ) OD (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multipiv by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B(A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
i/2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 it (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Depth
(inches)
o-4
L_1 L
Sampling Point: IN •A
ocument the Indicator or confirm the absence
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/n Twe Loc` Texture Remarks
Z� 1
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Mata
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Histosoi (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_V"Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
KestriC[Ive Laver
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecl/Site: F'o - 00 City/County: Jam/ �ou'f � 11 Sampling Date:it l
Applicant/Owner: State: NG Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): -�L WT!:AV rSK Section, Township, Range: P u.,�•oyN, 0tst
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): VLA Xk S10.et Local relief (concave, convex, nnonne): C,01ACIA, t Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): i1 -12-k Lat 35 . 8L y LA Long: T f0 4� 3 3 4 3: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: t �A NWI classification:A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? /SPO Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes —Z No
Are Vegetation Soilor Hydrology naturally problematic? Nti (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
VDrainage Patterns (B10)
/Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_J Water Marks (81)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
YAlgal Mat or Crust (114)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Alundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
ater-Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (136) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes NoDepth
(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
--Z
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: in)A
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Cover Soecies? Status
Number of Dominant Species 1,
1 • NA
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: f (A)
2.
Total NumberDominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: f D f) (AB)
5
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:1�
)
OBL species x 1 =
1. L'G,h,ou�W S�lAf4GrtMw.
0 �/ ��(,
—j�--
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
2. A r f LAO rwvr �j /—
3
—
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
5
6.
Prevalence Index = BJA =
50°x6 total
= Total Cover
Hycjrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
of cover:
20% of total cover:
V Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
t/2
- Dominance Test is >50%
1.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4•
5•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
/size:
1. u>A c.vs c t,L :NS
09L
Sapling
_0
—Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. 1 r o
w t73
ORL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
3.
4•
5
6.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
S.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
3 0 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
ption: (Describe to the depth no
Sampling Pant: V4M
or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Tvoe Loc`
_goo 10
3—l2 5�(�I.2e Q •Y Q WS 2b
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soli indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ L,pbmy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
(/Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: S�� ' dnL City/County: JOIV4-'��t6 I MPJ-tlA Sampling Date: ! �I t�
Applicant/Owner: State: N G Sampling Point: VIA J
Investigalor(s): -Y- �-)tQV lSRP I U Vn'OVZL' W t5i
Section, Township, Range:
J
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 061ACeyC Slope (%): 0 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?JUDO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes -V No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is mouiredq check all that a
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
daWater (Al) _
Water Table
Aquatic Fauna (813)
parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
�'Drainage
F��,Agh (A2) _Marl
Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Patterns (610)
turafon (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl)
Y ( )
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (B1) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3)
ry-Season Water Table (C2)
�ediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)aturafion
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
V Iron Deposits (135) _,
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquilard (133)
_,Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (DS)
Al Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes —Z No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No_
p (inches): �s
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)Depth
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
2. _S . 1 ay v�cr h_ 4 0 ot3t_
3.
4.
5.
6.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _ 40 20% of total cover: �-
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 30 V FAL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover. ! 5 20% of total cover: t0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. NA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Piot size: )
,. TUB 16 \/ c3U
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover. Z
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. NA
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
hological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: W /-t
uominance lest worxsneet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ISO (A(B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
Vv Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
,_/2 - Dominance Test is X50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
I Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the dei
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color moist %
�(0 5 C> 2 too
C' -
Sampling Point: kAYAJ
or
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvae Loc` Texture Remarks
'_Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
— Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
lack Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)_
yoamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
�L/Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mart (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (M LRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Z No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

CCC ^^WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: _1Lll ' 00 City/County: �0-\Aqs�4- / amIta"1 Sampling Date: I II ��
Applicant/Owner; State: NL Sampling Point:1AA-y
Investigator(s): - L W RANJ SK Section, Township, Range: Pt u vv,.oLA W LS't
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �-�k S1 oT. Local relief (concave, convex, none): GO -C V -f Slope (%): i- L
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): I- RR: Lat: 25. '611,0 lyq 3 Long: 4G,49 -L40111 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ?, VV\e&V 12t=x NWI classification: P r C) �, %
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? N O Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?VO (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YesNo Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 41 No within a Wetland? Yes _ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
aturadon (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)ry-Season
Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
2rayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
gal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ nundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): O
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover cie ? Status
1. NIA
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
= Total Cover
x 1 =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.ger_ C�},,fc
2 N�A duyw
iO N/ FA/
to E-A
3.
T
4.
Column Totals:
5.
6.
ZD = Total Cover
50% of total cover: I b 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Piot size:
j
1. i�1Dl"ovlAciivs GiL..�trr�(L•��s
�_ G�3L
2.
_�
3.
4.
5.
6.
Total Cover
50% of total cover._ 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. '(^unG. �ak�kol:h.
to OCIL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
8.
9.
10.
11.
1_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �_ 20% of total cover: Z
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: j
1.
2.
3.
4.
Sampling Point: 1&AY,
worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
X4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
by r physic vegetation Indicators:
✓� ']r Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -AM herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -AII woody vines, regardless of height.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Twe Loc` Texture Remarks
yoo
-►2 S 3 too
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sa
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_jiydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_koamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 _SCA
Date: � fl 10 I S Project/Site:
Eo -00 2 Latitude: 35. g?.(, 3
Evaluator: G Au e R County: ��11
Total Points:
M �ffi, Longitude: ^'/6, 4524
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Deter (circle one) Other P� Wt.OV}In iti�tCt
if >_ 19 orperennial if >_ 3o• t7 � Ephemeral ermitten Perennial e.g. quad Ns4ne:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = , 5 )
Absent Wea
ta' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
1
n le- ool se uence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict Floodplain
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
0
7. Recent alluvial-
1
0
8. Headcuts
1
0
9. Grade control
1
0
10. Natural valley
0'
0
11. Second or greater order channel
0.5
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
o=
B. H drolo Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Basefiow
0;--
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria014.
Leaf litter15.
Sediment on plants or debris16.Organic
debris lines or piles0
17. Soil -based evidencegh water table?
C. Biolo Subtotal =
No=O
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
19. Rooted upland plants In sfreambed
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)ETk
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
22. Fish
23. Crayfish24.
Amphibians25.
EAWFACW=0.7
Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
N
OBL
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1_5
1.5
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
Other = 0
T
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5 C13
Date:' v I (p 1 s- Pro jectfSite: SE 0 - b OZ Latitude:
Evaluator: I�LOb1:� County:M�R-T--T N Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Str eterminafion (circle one) Other P1 r �>1 t,�esf
Ifz 19 orperennialIF> 30• � ���$� emer I Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad X e:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = OLs )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strc
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
3
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Activelrelict Floodplain
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
3
10. Natural valley
0
.5
11.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o - 0
0.5
1
1.5
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Yes = 3
B. Hydrology Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
2
3
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5
1
1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal =
Ye
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
1
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22. Fish
1
2
3
23. Crayfish
0.51
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.50
26. Wetland plants in str mmbed
•perennial
0.5 1
FACW = .75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
1 5
streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
L

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S C
Date: >7 (p ` t S Project/Site: SE O - b OZ Latitude
3
Evaluator: IJ��Ob�� County:
M fa RTS N Longitude: 4 � -::n -Lo311 s�
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent t_ Stream Determination (circle one) Other PIy�0Ak LA)f�+
if 19 or erenniat if 2: 30• , em �af Intermittent Perennial e.g. quad Ndme:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
18'
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
3
ri le- ool se uence
0
Z?
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
S. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
2
3
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0.5
1
1.5
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions to manual
= 0
Yes =
3
B. Hydrology Subtotal G)
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2w1r,
Leaf litter
1.5
214.
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
debris lines or piles
01.
0.516.Organic
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C B'
Yes 3
. lolo y (Subtotal = 9
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abu
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be Identified u:
Sketch:
3 2
3 2 1
ice) 1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
® 0.5 1
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
J
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S C F,
Date: Iv Ito I is- Project/Site: S Z
E(i -b0 Latitude: 35, 52,14(D:4V
Evaluator: a Woo,0E,_r_ County:
M �R'TT N Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittentStream Determination (circle one) Other P1y v.,Oo k W J�;f
/f>_ 19 orperennial if>_ 30' 13's, e 1 Intermittent Perennial e.g. quad Xve:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
,a,
Absent
Weak
Modera
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
01
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, -step -pool,
2
ri le ool se uence
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Acfive/relict floodplain
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
1
2
10. Natural valley
1
11. Second or greater order channel
.5
1
e
o =
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1
2
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
G. BiologySubtotal =
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
1
21. AquaUG Mollusks
1
1
2
22. Fish
®
0.5
2
1
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
�
0.5
0.5
1
25. Algae
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0.5
1
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 Othei
Sketch:
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
Yes =3
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
Yes
13, ____]
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

N
0
0
0
w
co
Photograph 5: Wetland area E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 6: Wetland area I located in the southwestern portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart P%klm hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(1') JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Photograph 7: Wetland area J located in the southwestern portion of the site.
Photograph 8: Wetland soil with low chroma sampled in Wetland Area C located in the central portion of the site.
o 14 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
0 hart '"• hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
N W`704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(fl JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
w
U)
Photograph 9: Stream channel A located in the central portion of the site.
Photograph 10: Stream channel B located in the western portion of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
hart 040 hickman Charlotte, NC 28203 MILL POND ROAD
w 704 586 0007(p) 704.586.03730 JAMESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

N
0
0
0
w
U)
Photograph 11: Stream channel E located in the eastern portion of the site.
Photograph 12: Upland area located in the central and northern portions of the site.
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 85 -ACRE PROPERTY
haft OND
w hickman 04.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(0 JAMESVILLECharlotte, NC 28203 MILLPNOR HOAD CAROLINA