20161070 Ver 1_401 Application_20161116

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B.0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b),.0259 (8)(b),.0267 (11)(c),.0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
Riparian Buffer Authorization Form
A. Applicant Information 0 1 6 1 0 7 0
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project: Gl Er
1 b. County: r
1 c. Nearest municipality: �r
1d. Subdivision name: 11e. -P '
1 e. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer if below.
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Pq No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed:
VN�J r +
2b. Deed Book and Page No.
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created):
-
2d. Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
t7
Fr W e,Y- I�r S C� n
2e. Street address:
r r r'
2f. City, state, zip:
0
2g. Telephone no.:
"] q
2h. Fax no.:
L- q
2i. Email address:
,r FER P �RCES
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b. Name:
3c. Business name
(if applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name:
1 by G�YeYI Q Z
4b. Business name
(if applicable):
L.,p-r-1 e -)r,% S ✓v1 e S ✓1
4c. Street address:
r
4d. City, state, zip:
Y- 0.✓1LIV LP
4e. Telephone no.:
_ .4
4f. Fax no.:52,R-3,100
4g. Email address:cL.-`-e--r-
S am C
FORM: BA 10-2013e✓-dOc�KS a> 1 • C age of 4

Project Information and Prior Project History
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4 C1 7
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: -3 5 0j 91
Longitude: q
1 c.
Property size:
,54acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
vj e Norman
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
`J
2c.
River basin:
11
C --&w bcL
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: eS'►clev�-�ial Lc,Acfy-on+ Loi. SpowSe, ro-5S.—F--eeS-
Nt +ree5 w'i 1 I b e d-1 tALV b ed . See. Aita ,eci Q ho1Ds .
3b. Attach an 8'/z x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the site
3c.
Attach an 8'/2 x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site
3d.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: -50C&:4iVA G.ha re -5t cierkiak Doc_
3f.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: 5e. A4acheJ
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/ Consultant Company:
Other:
4c.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
14 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
Se ,, hecA ► -1 y- n
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 2 of 5

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
1. Buffer Impacts
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse
❑ Randleman
❑ Tar -Pamlico Ig Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1 b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require
form.
mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this
Buffer impact Reason for Type of impact
number — impact (exempt, allowable,
Permanent (P) allowable w/ mitigation)
or Temporary
T
Stream name Buffer Zone 1
mitigation impact
required? (sq ft)
Zone 2
impact
(sq ft)
B1 ❑ T
Zone
❑ Yes ONo /7,0
Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet (square feet
62 aP ❑ Tyu,iqr
Wwo
❑ Yes [-No
1.5
B3 ❑ P ❑ T CPer. Diu-, Port t lai-n Foav")
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c.
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, attadi the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
135 ❑ P ❑ T
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
136 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
1 c. Comments:
El e.raVed bOardwc,_l 1L w ►th
Ye S+ O n - 5"X 2S "$e 5�7Ports rrU� re . fCVc,s dV-Ae+al ai-i"p— QrPerv
"0 US I
D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
2.
Buffer Mitigation
2a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
Ell Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet (square feet
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2d.
If yes, attadi the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e.
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f.
Comments:
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 3 of 5

C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 4 of 5

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
❑ Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
1 a.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
❑ Yes [a No
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP
public (federal/state) land?
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
1 b.
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
❑ Yes [a No
public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes g] No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland
❑ Yes No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
'FY -Q.►-% Y1 W a 11 e Yr MD Q
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name App'calnt/Agenfs Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent For government transportation projects sent
by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service: by delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc):
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit OR INC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail
via the US Postal Service
Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
For all other projects sent by delivery service
(UPS, FedEx, etc):
OR Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 5 of 5

AREA SUMMARY
LOT 20
0046 ACRE
23x04 SGFT.
NOWS.
t) Ane d trmh.d by DlaNhab Cmpat~ M.Med
2) R'e2nty subject to my f " Wt may b aLOewd by a AR
M P..rot. Nis. -.M.
3) Pryorty My Me/ ",Oct to my Rmtrktbr; EZ=mta and/
R/2ht eT Ab/. r card M thew net of r—d n eh.y ..Wt.
4) A M N **t y N An et.d h a Read Nmvd -
nom me amd" Det. J/14�y20m /E MAPS
3) AAJbet AVWY Zan.d R -2O
5) Na Gwbtk Mmwnmt Annd ~ 2000" o/ AAjact Ptq-1y
7) S. R..hkOw Cb—t. DB 57-5 370
CURVE TABLE
NUN DELTA ARC RADIUS BEARING DISTANCE
Ct 109210 49.73 254.00 N54'25 43 E I 49.68
-1/217
19
4
40 0 40 80
SCALE.- 1' = 40'
ACR m/ AAO ARO IWtOtO/R AV /CIN NA AM. a7® (00
Williams Land Surveying, Inc.
Li—oo Numb r C-aW
274 5yrmount Adm W t.-Ift NO AMM
ph— 1704)B7M-OW - a—a.- ru.,1.qWWth@bW1.,uth1W
L7)s InUAMMI
Own w InAr �owo W ( do -*I � h
IaM /HL Pain I/R ar aNr 101ww
Ilet sro Oewibr nst ew.,.d .. anew) w 4+dw Aiw
hMmeHn NUM h M ds.w M PNb w -to*
Da! IN nitb W
lit: 100001: M fhX tAk /Nt mwb N.
r.qW—ft N N. Stwdvd. W P/e.W. N. LMSUwiip h //aN CerwFe
—mg & IArM MM Adnhhb.tla wI. AI. 2t. 0.0tr IAL Swt4n fm
to a—I'sbwt or dtma -bHW . I..t acob of A2q M dome /rot
This 24th oby of A.—. 2016
✓ 10. YV d4a,,�
Thomas E. N9/A-4 NCPLS 4718
"11111101",
`0gNAROI
. 2.Q�oFE O,y9` y's
SEAL
L-4718,
hyo
Sl0c
ht�;: �
•q E. W�
'••I/.IIIIIIIIII
r my om
LAKE
1 NORMAN
Boundary and Physical Survey
224 Allendale Circle
ALLENDALE POINT
LOT 20
Fallstown Township, Iredell County, NC
PIN# 4628-69-7676 — D.B. 1812-816 — P.B. 7-21
Property of.- ROCA COMPANY
LEGEND
PRLPERrY Lm (P/L)
— — —
— — AUIT Or NAY
W Lm
— — —
— — ADdMN/G PRQ-ERrY LITE
FROM DEED OR PLAr
--------------
RAL POW
---------
FOM FDOCID&W
PONO7 LAVE
BLAEDNVD SETBACK UNE
—._._._
----- 30' VEDETARVE Lit#M
EX
Dorm
PP
PONE? POLE
LP
L/CKT POLE
TPA
7FLEPINONE PEDESTAL
40 0 40 80
SCALE.- 1' = 40'
ACR m/ AAO ARO IWtOtO/R AV /CIN NA AM. a7® (00
Williams Land Surveying, Inc.
Li—oo Numb r C-aW
274 5yrmount Adm W t.-Ift NO AMM
ph— 1704)B7M-OW - a—a.- ru.,1.qWWth@bW1.,uth1W
L7)s InUAMMI
Own w InAr �owo W ( do -*I � h
IaM /HL Pain I/R ar aNr 101ww
Ilet sro Oewibr nst ew.,.d .. anew) w 4+dw Aiw
hMmeHn NUM h M ds.w M PNb w -to*
Da! IN nitb W
lit: 100001: M fhX tAk /Nt mwb N.
r.qW—ft N N. Stwdvd. W P/e.W. N. LMSUwiip h //aN CerwFe
—mg & IArM MM Adnhhb.tla wI. AI. 2t. 0.0tr IAL Swt4n fm
to a—I'sbwt or dtma -bHW . I..t acob of A2q M dome /rot
This 24th oby of A.—. 2016
✓ 10. YV d4a,,�
Thomas E. N9/A-4 NCPLS 4718
"11111101",
`0gNAROI
. 2.Q�oFE O,y9` y's
SEAL
L-4718,
hyo
Sl0c
ht�;: �
•q E. W�
'••I/.IIIIIIIIII
r my om
LAKE
1 NORMAN
Boundary and Physical Survey
224 Allendale Circle
ALLENDALE POINT
LOT 20
Fallstown Township, Iredell County, NC
PIN# 4628-69-7676 — D.B. 1812-816 — P.B. 7-21
Property of.- ROCA COMPANY

7/19/2016
OCONNECTGIS
WEB HOSTING
0,28-59ti+96 ;
262"'40-31192 V /14 \ f
2�� of 2$-rjrl'GRI
_28j9=46 I
462111:3 �js 2
72246 _6
4628r�- 73
� 20
N
402$_139-6673
21
4628- 11-7676
ConnectGIS Feature Report
Iredell
Printed July 19, 2016
See Below for Disclaimer
Addresses
�(9 • Infrastructure
NonResidential Use
Residential Use
Streets
Interstate
Ramp
Iredell Countyline
161 NC .: •.inties
CI
44 Feet
hftn /lrarldl rmnpr.tnic rnm/nrwnlrvwiFila achr7i- anc mandR7FHIA0..gg,; ,tgn149rdfAn17aMM1: '•F0h&t-nrinfir1 119
US Hwy
221,
State Hwy
•
— Main Road
Local Road
0
w
— Residential
v Private
Inactive
Parcels Hooks
Parcels
r'
Parcel Labels
r
City Limits
Lake Norman
Iredell Countyline
161 NC .: •.inties
CI
44 Feet
hftn /lrarldl rmnpr.tnic rnm/nrwnlrvwiFila achr7i- anc mandR7FHIA0..gg,; ,tgn149rdfAn17aMM1: '•F0h&t-nrinfir1 119

7/19/2016 ComectGIS Feature Report
OBJECTID
PILI
Owner Name
6763
4628697676.000
ROCA COMPANY
Deed Book
Deed Pa9e
Doc Type
1812
816
WD
Deed Date
Tax Acres
1-01
20061228
0
20
piAl
Subdivision
Phase
7-21
ALLENDALE POINT
Description
Township
NBH Code
ALLENDALE POINT P67-21
15
15003
Assessed Valu
Sales Year
Sales Price
482890
2006
0
Sale Is Improved
Actual Year Build
Number of Bedroom
1
1965
4
Number of Bath
Number of Half Bath
Actual Heated Area
1
0
1680
The maps prepared for this website are generated from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records. Users of these maps are hereby notified that the information
provided herein should be verified. Iredell County assumes no legal responsibilities for any of the information
contained on this site. Users are advised that the use o
any of this information is at their own risk. All maps on
this site were prepared using a 10005€- Grid based upon the North Carolina State Plane Coordinate System from
he 1983 North American Datum. The delinquent real property tax overlay is updated monthly. The information presented is not intended to be used or relied upon a
official notice of tax liens. For additional information regarding
delinquent taxes, contact the Iredell County
Tax Collector's Office.
hVJfiracMi.connectgis.com/DowrtloadFile.ashx?i _ags ngA876dla9e2a54b03a0132c4f8017a9dk.ttMdd=prinUd 2/2

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR n. TROUTMAN QUAORANOLE
U.S. GEOLOOMAL SURVEY :a ORTN GROLINA
�...••... .OS Topo ,.yNUEE,ERIES
-- t0. q 28q toLp
AMuwbUr YMW l.[r OnYdal Tivvy
'
SCALE 1:24000
nw nc•rp.
a
M.�r. r....wr
rrr.•b.rr.r►.•.rriR.rn r•en
-
..e
�anrrr ro Qyu S'-•
i .0
•+
v..�r x...r.ar.
m*
n+..n.....snw
FT77i
n.a.+._.._.rr ..sr ....r. ...r, m m.
-"..
......rti.r...wN..�r.n
n
TROUTMAN, NC

N0hft91 #IesOt �2St;ornerval«�n e,wi,e.�..�
Web Soil Survey
�3lossary P'Oeren("' i Lima i Lagoat i Hnl(+
b
Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Data Explorer Download Soils Data Shopping Cart (Free)
Printable Version) Add to Shopping Cart
K J I* -01 * 10 A 4 Scale 1:3,960 T t 1 °!o
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
FOIA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Policy I Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House
hftp:/A,vebsoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App=ebSoiISurvey.aspx 1/1
',.I3 i9nit?
Catawba County, North Carolina (NC035)
Map
Map Unit Name
Acres
Percent
Unit
in
of AOI
Symbol
AOI
W
Water
6.3
2.8%
Subtotals
for Soil Survey Area
6.3
2.8%
Iredell County, North Carolina (NC097)
Map
Map Unit Name
Acres
Percent
Unit
in
of AOI
Symbol
AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to
3.8
1.7%
6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CeC2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 6 to
1.4
0.6%
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
LcB2
Lloyd clay loam, 2 to 6
2.3
1.0%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
MaE4
Madison-Udorthents
4.4
2.0%
complex, 15 to 25 percent
slopes, gullied
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to
2.6
1.2%
25 percent slopes
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to
1.3
0.6%
45 percent slopes
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6
35.2
15.8%
to 10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PcD2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10
12.5
5.6%
to 15 percent slopes,
K J I* -01 * 10 A 4 Scale 1:3,960 T t 1 °!o
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
FOIA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Policy I Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House
hftp:/A,vebsoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App=ebSoiISurvey.aspx 1/1

Fi�YiF_:JYil
35° 37 39" N
3 Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina 3
(ROCA Company)
506190 506260 506330 506400 506470
3
Map Scale: 1:2,870 if printad on A portrait (8.5' x 11") sheet
Meters
N
0 40 80 160 240
0 100 200 400 600
A Map Pro] : Web Mercahx Garner coordinates: WG584 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WG584
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
pp 35° 37 58' N
i�
m
0
0
b
0
0
0
0
0
x
S
�i
�i
V
V
35° 37 39" N
506540 506610
3
10/31/2016
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
O
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
ti
Soil Map Unit Lines
M
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
0. Special Line Features
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Gravel Pit
measurements.
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Lava Flow
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Marsh or swamp
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Mine or Quarry
O
Miscellaneous Water
O
Perennial Water
Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina
(ROCA Company)
MAP INFORMATION
gl Spoil Area
Rock Outcrop
4) Stony Spot
Saline Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Sandy Spot
#
Severely Eroded Spot
T Wet Spot
Sinkhole
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Slide or Slip
o,
Sodic Spot
Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina
(ROCA Company)
MAP INFORMATION
gl Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
4) Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
40 Very Stony Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
T Wet Spot
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Other
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
0. Special Line Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Water Features
measurements.
Streams and Canals
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Transportation
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
+44 Rails
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
rV Interstate Highways
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
US Routes
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Major Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
Local Roads
calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
. Aerial Photography
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 15, 2015
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
I "Im Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
.� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
ROCA Company
Iredell County, North Carolina (NC097)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AOI
Percent of AOI
MaE4
Madison-Udorthents complex,
1.6
4.6%
15 to 25 percent slopes,
gullied
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45
1.3
3.9%
percent slopes
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
4.3
12.6%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcD2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10 to
3.4
9.9%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PcE2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to
5.2
15.2%
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
W
Water
18.3
53.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
34.0
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
21111111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

35" 394'N
350 3734"N
m 505800 505900 506000 506100 506200 506300 506400 506500
3
b
Map Scale: 1:6,490 if printed on A IandBcape (11"x8.5') Sheet
eh?rs
M
N 0 50 100 200 300
A0 300 600 1200 1800
Map proje�on: Web Wrcabor Corner eoordirt�: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
3 Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina, and Iredell County, North Carolina
b (ROCA Company)
iR
505800 505900 506000 506100 506200 506300 506400 506500 506600 50670D 506800 506900 507000 507100
3
� qqq
35" 39 4" N
t5S
tyyf
g
m
r,
506600 506700 506800 506900 507000 507100
350 37 34" N
3 Yui
7�
10/31/2016
Page 1 of 4

Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina, and Iredell County, North Carolina
(ROCA Company)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Q
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines
Other
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
(Jo
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
O
Miscellaneous Water
C
Perennial Water
V
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
4W
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
*#" Rails
Interstate Highways
ry US Routes
_ Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales
ranging from 1:12,000 to 1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: hftp://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Catawba County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 9, 2014
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 15, 2015
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with
a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels
of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area
boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
2111111111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Spoil Area
io
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Li
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
*#" Rails
Interstate Highways
ry US Routes
_ Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales
ranging from 1:12,000 to 1:15,800.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: hftp://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Catawba County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 9, 2014
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 15, 2015
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with
a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels
of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area
boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
2111111111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina, and Iredell County, North Carolina
(ROCA Company)
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina, and Iredell County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
ROCA Company
Catawba County, North Carolina (NC035)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
W Water 6.3 2.8%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 6.3 2.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 222.4 100.0%
Iredell County, North Carolina (NC097)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 6
3.8 1.7%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Cecil sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
CeC2
14 0.6%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
LcB2
Lloyd clay loam, 2 to 6 percent
2.3
1.0%
slopes, moderately eroded
MaE4
Madison-Udorthents complex,
4.4
2,0%
15 to 25 percent slopes,
gullied
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
2.6
1.2%
percent slopes
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45
1.3
0.6%
percent slopes
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
35.2
15.8%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcD2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10 to
12.5
5.6%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PcE2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to
18.3
8.2%
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
W
Water
134.4
60.4%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
216.2
97.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
222.4
100.0%
tism Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/31/2016
a60 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

USDA United States
= Department of
Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Iredell County,
North Carolina
October 31, 2016

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For
more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http://
offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................7
SoilMap................................................................................................................8
Legend..................................................................................................................9
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................10
MapUnit Descriptions........................................................................................10
Iredell County, North Carolina.........................................................................12
MaE4—Madison-Udorthents complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, gullied..... 12
PaF—Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes...................................13
PcC2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................15
PcD2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................16
PcE2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................17
W—Water....................................................................................................19
References............................................................................................................20
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
M

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
7

35° 37 58" N
35° 37 39"N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
506190
506260 506330 506400 506470 506540
506610
3
3
NMap
Scale: 1:2,870 if printed on A portmit (85' x 11") sheet.
$3 N0
40 80 160 240 Meters
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WG584 Edge dcs: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
8
pp 35° 37 W N
i�
M
N
35° 37 39' N

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Area of Interest (AOI)
Stony Spot
Soils
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Soil Map Unit Polygons
_j
Soil Map Unit Lines
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of ma
Enlar 9 p Y Aping can cause
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Soil Map Unit Points
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
.� Special Line Features
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
®
Borrow Pit
measurements.
Transportation
X
Clay Spot
4-i--► Rails
Closed Depression
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Interstate Highways
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Landfill
Local Roads
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
A.
Lava Flow
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Background
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
Marsh or swamp
. Aerial Photography
calculations of distance or area are required.
Mine or Quarry
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
0
Miscellaneous Water
the version date(s) listed below.
Perennial Water
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
%,1
Rock Outcrop
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 15, 2015
+
Saline Spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
Sandy Spot
or larger.
Severely Eroded Spot
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
V
Sinkhole
13, 2011
0
Slide or Slip
oe
Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
'0

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Iredell County, North Carolina (NC097)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
MaE4
Madison-Udorthents complex,
1.6
4.6%
15 to 25 percent slopes,
gullied
PaF
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45
1.3
3.9%
percent slopes
PcC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
4.3
12.6%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcD2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10 to
3.4
9.9%
15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcE2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to
5.2
15.2%
25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
W
Water
18.3
53.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
34.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Iredell County, North Carolina
MaE4—Madison-Udorthents complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, gullied
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mcrj
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Madison, gullied, and similar soils: 50 percent
Udorthents, gullied, and similar soils: 40 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Madison, Gullied
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 6 to 26 inches: clay
BC - 26 to 37 inches: clay loam
C - 37 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Udorthents, Gullied
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Gullied land
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
PaF—Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mcr6
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor components: 13 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
E - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 29 inches: clay
BC - 29 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 25 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Spartanburg
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
PcC2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2mcpg
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition ,
Pacolet, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 9 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: sandy clay loam
B - 7 to 28 inches: clay
B - 28 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 44 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Madison, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Spartanburg, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
PcD2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2mcph
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: sandy clay loam
8 - 7 to 28 inches: clay
8 - 28 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
C - 44 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Madison, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Spartanburg, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
PcE2—Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2mcr4
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet, moderately eroded, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 13 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 7 to 28 inches: clay
BC - 28 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 44 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Madison, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Spartanburg, moderately eroded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water.' 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
19

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
F W S/O BS -79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres 142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
MIJ

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detai I/soils/scientists/?cid=n res142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://www. n res.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
21

��ms�e�enumo
Doc ID: 010361040003 Type: CRP
Recorded: 12/28/2008 at 08:11:44 AM
Fee Amt: 520.00 Page i of 3
Excise Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Brenda D. Bell Register of Deeds
BK1812 Pa816-818
1)
ORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: 1"Alf) l4Au eiv v -0—
Parcel Identifier No. Verified by County on the day of , 20_
By:
No title examinaElon requestea or or erformea Dy Preparer of U21T5
Mail/Boxto; instrument. No closing performed by reparer of this instrument.
This instrument was prepared by: Mark T. Davis, Attorney, PO Box 1087, Taylorsville, NC 28681
Brief description for the Index:
THIS DEED made this { (� -rk day of QL , 20 p6by and between
GRANTOR I GRANTEE
SCIOTO INCORPORATED ROCA COMPANY, an Ohio General Partnership;
Daniel J. Stewart, General Partner;
Robert W. Stewart, General Partner;
Mary Ellen Berry, General Partner;
Ruth I. Stewart, General Partner and
Frank L. Wall r, Managin General Partner
�v 6 X ITT
Me &41V-#- O h
Enter in appropriate block for each parry: name, address, and, if appropriate, charac of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has
and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in
the City of , Township, Iredell County,
North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
FOR COMPLETE DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY
REFERENCE.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 375 page 373
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book page
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 0 1976, Revised 0 1977, 2002 + James Williams & Co., Inc.
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 www.JamesWilliams.com

1
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee
simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year na abcpe wt � '•, ;,, '}
SCIOTO INCOORATED
Sb
; 0
RP
(Entity Name)
BX:
Ap
00,
Title: FRANK L. WALLER, President x ';J,,,"'{1„'`[�,�.��7c�
By: v (SEAL)
Title:
co
By:. (SEAL)
��0 75 • r} U State of b1cmdrezabo -County of 5 C t 0 T 0
0 t
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
FRANK L. W A L LER personally appeared before me this day and
r• "•' acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purpom therein expressed. Witness m
V hand and Notarial stamp or seal this Zo T H day of O EC E M B E R , 200 (a
i . TARY Pj1-IC
I© IRES 4Z.HiWommission Expires: 4 - S - ZOO9
Notary Public
. a
State of -County of SOOTO
OT'O
,�,�5• �'' �p •� OBtd
0 •, •.: l I, the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
ti; •° , j;� ;9 a
: ,p • •,. r ,,,,fes;' � � z Frank L. Waller personally came before me this day and
�r,t. �-�• 0acknowledged that _heisthe President of Scioto Incorporated
Z a North Carolina or corporation intitediiabiiitytorn�TnylgtRtEre1' Q1i I fRlfiu ed
6 =:: t '•.' �� ' x pat:tRwElip(strike through the inapplicable), and that by authority duly given and as the act of each entity,
J- :, .; ,;.;,�•;�1:, 'd V he signed the forgoing instrument in its name on its behalf as its act and deed. Witness my hand and
,'� ,,, a Notarial stamp or seal this a,OT t 1 day of 20/� (o
A b ✓ W
rIVOTARY P Commission Expires: 4 – a – Z009
CoMY AA�A ION EXPIRES 4-a.2009 Notary Public
>t; AL- .l_.," NIT' >-, State of North Carolina - County of
I, the undersigned Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that
x
Witness my hand and Notarial stamp or seal this day of , 20—.
wMy Commission Expires:
Notary Public
The foregoing Certificate(s) of is/are certified to be correct.
This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at thedate and ti a and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof.
Register Deeds for County
By: Deputy/ ssistant - Register of Deeds
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 0 1976, Revised 0 1977, 2002 * James Williams & Co., Inc.
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association - 1981 www.JamesWilliams.com

EXHIBIT "A"
BEING ALL OF LOT NUMBER 20 of Allendale Point owned by Scioto
Incorporated and shown on Plat recorded in Plat Book Number 7 on
Page 21 in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County.
Reference to said Plat is hereby made for a greater certainty of
description.
FOR BACK TITLE
Iredell County
conveyed.
d/roca2.exa
see Deed recorded in Book 375 at Page 373 of the
Registry, this being the same property therein

Part B, Section B, V
Construct a fixed pier/walkway and dock with 4' wide boardwalk along shoreline as shown on the
attached drawings. The walkway will be a metal framed boardwalk affixed to piling crossheads and be
installed along the shoreline contour. The boardwalk will be elevated such that the frames will not
contact the ground on either the upstream or downstream side of the walkway.
Equipment to be used:
The pilings will be placed utilizing an auger.
The frames will be installed on the pilings by hand carrying the units to the pilings and bolting them in
place.
Alternately, if the water levels in the lake are at a sufficient level, the frames will be placed on piling
crossheads utilizing a crane on the floating plant.
Porcelain pavers will be hand placed on the frames for the walking surface.

13
m
e
13

VO
i e
s
=+5 ffi
yy t�
r
t
jJ
ti
VO
i e
s
=+5 ffi
yy t�
r

TWA
.41
j R
y� 1
1"S ,
, 1
a� e
-v�
ti
I
: �It13 xR�: 1 V 1 � I.
7l
41
ul.i
#�

o

6
f M-'006
,
c`" ,%W.kc .,rte:-s��fi},� i, �' ���• -.�xa "F�^ y� ^,:i. s �F.ar� ,4�` "'7f: '" •� .�, a z4' +.:�' �f`, 'w•
:`" � ° ► � _�� �; �� ��� t 4 . RS'`k � is,�'.`w'z"' _ ,'.�"�` � �i�. - �isar_._g�'�"
,
vit
M�a � >t. �` - �{ - 'F `' 7"'.'-R 'Y�7' .i� �Z� { � .. 44..���j�k',�G� . i �'�F. f a het?., •��� .. -.X s..�� � Via.
', ga.,�, *,, —$' < 'r .<'i' ,'^A.;.►'�',�Fi p�, ,,'y".. .t; �p '`iC �.�' ?}:.>. `t .?i.:�y,,,irt<.
.d"4y
{.a a' .. t �,.� � .. , . �, a �!'��' y ' fk! � tiP �..� �''�' Tit•; .FY�I.�"'�.�e`�q�5;�,�,} q'�j�+ Y. Y.,.. .��` } �� ^'a t.: yf _
f `► a �J !'ra, as.,e ` ` .lags ,.'�. o- y a{»�,....:„Ya,'i�'Y".'a+F .iTt%i+.„yt
',�`.+4.. ;�t�!'S.�•.J�.y ...�v�rs � �, vi �Ls 'ri., �v;'�'` tk* s €►z ,� is.,. � ^t£3 ,ori s-,l,.-.;�-"� :y.. �'g»:w`'.,,i�.... .,
� Nom... �. ,,�,'r�•'.s.,'`,"h{')"+���`yM,. `*. ��
� � .. :. - ms,µ _ r .» � • , t+y `al�� #y � R x �� �1` � ���� b'” 4.�. � "b � ;� , - � �-.„.,
� ..„^,�, � � •m ^""^. ,;.c:, ;�".,- .�. �r, w * �.♦'�` .;�,$^'y�� 'Av•�{°4 "`� � � ^ �C' � � w,. �'k sem.. _ +.
` ♦ . -,: r. - ,y -F ?Eag -pS' K� .i"� ,y ♦u .�J' 7i �: z,' ae_
41
,�,
�. x�
•"»-
y W
y�
e
^
y� ,v
u
i
:H
u
R
� ^ Y
.A
S

a
14
4
a
14
8
4%

10/31/2016 IMG_6715.JPG
https:Hmail.google.com/mail/u/O/#search/waller/l 557e268b63a87a3?projector=1 1/1

10/31/2016
IMG_6716.JPG
E
https://mai I.google.com/mai I/Li/O/#search/wal ler/l557e268b63a87a3?proj ector=1 1 /1

0

10/31/2016 IMG-6718.JPG
A&
N,
000000"
......................
4
L
IT,
Aft,
1� 01-4
lj�
WIT,
A 'N
QMMAi CN
�-A
0*- %0,
NZ
7 A-1
f 'T -,ctl',!i,'&'
S. IA(
L
-Or
https:Hmail.google.com/mail/u/O/#searchAivaller/1557e268b63a87a3?projector=l
4.1

10/31/2016 IMG_6718.JPG
IVA-
41
yj i * � �;�� K Z '�•ZA
7
• r c,
yr .
A
Ot �► ,��
t ,
� F
g
M,
https:Hmail.google.com/m ai I/u/0/#search/wal ler/1557e268b63a87a3?projector=1

10/31/2016 IMG_6714.JPG
https://mail.google.com/mail/ti/Ot#searchtwaller/1557e268b63a87a3?prcodor=l 1/1

10/31/2016 IMG_6710.JPG
https:Hmail.google.com/mail/ul0t#searchlwal I er/1557e268b63a87a3?projector=1 1 /1

NOTES, GENERAL NOTES
1 AIIFRAMING EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO CHAPTER 3605 OF
THE NORTH CAROLINA BUILDING CODE AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED PER THE AWPA
HANDBOOK
2 ALL PIES AND VERTICAL TIAMR5 SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA
HANDBOOK.
3 ALLEXPOSED FRAMING LUMBER TO BE SYP NO. l OR BETTER, ROOF FRAMING LUMBER TO BE
N0.2511 OR SETTER.
4- ALL MET AL CONNECTORS SHALL BE:
MOT -DIP GALVANIZED'
FASTENER AND HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS HAVE SUGGESTED THE MINIMUM HOTDIP
GALVANIZED REQUIREMENIS TOR USE WITH TREATED WOOD SHOULD CONFORM 10 THE
10 HIS ASTM STANDARDS: ASTM AIS3IFOR HOTDIP FASTENER PRODUCTS) AND
ASTM M53 (COATING DESIGNATION G-185 FOR HOTDIPCONNECTOR AND SHEET PRODUCTS).
STAINLESS STEEL
STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS AND CONNECTORS ARE REQUIRED TOR PERMANENT WOOD
FOUNDATIONS BELOW GRADE AND ARE RECOMMENDED FORUM WITH TREATED WOOD IN
OTHER SEVERE EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS SUCH AS SWIMMING POOLS, SALT WATER EXPOSURE,
ETC, TYPE M,IAND 316ARE THE RECOMMENDEDGRADES TO USE.
OTHER FASTENERS AND HARDWARE AS RECOMMENDED BYTLE MANUFACTURER
THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS 10 TIER THAN S IAINLESS STEEL OR HO T -DIP
GALVANIZEDI WHICH ARE SUITABLE FOR USE WITH ACQ PRESERVED WOOD. PLEASE CONSULT
WITH THE INDIVIDUAL FASTENER OR HARDWARE MANUFACTURER FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR USE OF THEIR PRODUCTS WITH ACO PRESERVED WOOD.
DRY USE APPLIKAEKINS
WHEN ACQ PRESERVED WOOD IS USED FOR INTERIOR APPLICATIONS WITH CONTINUOUS DRY
CONDITIONS, WHERE THE WOOD IN SERVICE WILL REMAIN BELOW 19W EQUILIBRIUM
MOSS TUBE CON TEN T, THE PERFORMANCE OF FASTENERS, HARDWARE AND O THEN METAL
PRODUCTS IN CONTACT WITH THE TREATED WOOD SHOULD BE SIMILAR TO THAT
EXPERIENCED WITH UNTREATED WOOD.
ALUMNUMSHOULDNOTREUSEDINDIRECTCONTA WITHACOH RVE0WOOD
SPACER MATERIALS OR OTHER PHYSICAL BARRIERS ARE RECOMMENDED TO PREVENT DIRECT
CON (AC(Of ACQ PRESERVED WOOD AND ALUMINUM PRODUCTS.
THESEFASTENER RECOMMENDATIONS ARE COMPARABLE TO FASTENER RECOMMENDATIONS
FROM OTHER WOODPRESERVATIVEMANUFA RERSOFACOANDCOPPERAZOLE.
'ELECTROPLATED GALVANIZED FASTENER AND METAL PRODUCTS ARE TYIICALLY NOT
ACCEPTED BY THE BUILDING CODES FOR USE IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS, REGARDLESS OF THE
TYPE OF WOOD USED
S- WASHERS SHALL BE USED WITH EVERY CONNECTION BUILT WHICH COMES IN CONTACT
WITH WOOD. PILOT HOLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE DIAME TR OF THE BOLT MORE THAN 1/16'.
6 BOLTS SHALL BE TIGHTENED TO THE MINI THE WASHER BEGINS TO COMPRESS THE WOOD FIBERS
BY NO MORE THAN 1/8'.
7 PILESSHALLBEAILEASIVINDIAMETER.
8- PIERS OR PILES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AND SEQUENCE AS TO PREVENT
)STORTION OR DAMAGE TO PILES BEING INSTALLED OR ALREADY IN PLACE TO THE "TENT THAT
SUCH DISTORTION OR DAMAGE AFFEC FS THE STRUC WRAL IN TEGRI FY OF THE PILES.
9 THE ALLOWABLE COMPRESSIVE LOAD ON ANY PILE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE APPLICATION
OF AN APPROVED DRIVING FORMULA. THE PILE SHOULD BE DRIVEN TO REFUSAL OR A MINIMUM
DROVE PENETRATION NO EXCEED 21/2` PER BLOW BASED ON A HAMMER WEIGHT OF Me AND
DROP DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 8 FT, NNE
R-ZWH
15
10 ALL FUMING CHANNELS SHALL CONFORM IOTHEASIDESIGNFORCOLD-FORMED STEEL
STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, 1986 WITH 1989 ADDENDUM.
11-M PIER AND DOCK SHALL HAVE TVO WHFTE REFLECTORS A MINIMUM OF 6- ABOVE FULL
POND ELEVATION, ON EACH SIDE OF THE FURTHERMOST CORNER OF THE EMN90N OF THE PIER
INTO THE WATER, REFLECTING LIGHT PARALLELTO THE SHORE IN EACH DIRECTION AND DIRECTLY
ACROSS THE WATERLINE WITH THE SHORE FROM EACH CORNER. WHITE REFLECTORS SHALL BE
PLACED ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIER AT INTERVALS OF 15' OR MSS A MINIMUM OF 6" ABOVE FULL
POND ELEVATION, BEGINNING AT THE OUTERMOST EXTENSION AND EXTENDING TO THE 760
CONCOIIRUNE.
12- DESIGN LOADS:
FLOATING SUPS: 20 PM OR 300 CONCENTRATED LOAD
BOARDWALKS AND PIERS; 40 PV OR 300 LB
HANDRAIL NOTES
WALKWAYS, ACCESS PIERS, STEPS OR RANGES
PERSONNEL HANDRAILS OR OTHER SAFETY
PROVISION SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EDGES
WHERE THE VERTICAL DRP TO THE MEAN LOW
WATER LEVEL OR MUDLINE EXCEEDS 6 FEET. PER
CHAPTER 36 SECTION 3606.6 OF THE 2012
NORTH CAROLINA BUILD CODE
PER AVERAGES FROM THE
LAKEDUKE ENERGY (E
LEVEL CHARTS THE ESTIMATED AVERAGE LOW
LEVEL 5 98.3 WHICH IS 2'-3!' BELOW FULL
POND.
DRIP PAN NOTES
BETCO PANS SHOULD NOT COME IN DIRECT
CONTACT WITH ACO PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER.
ACRTZICH PANS WITH A BARRIER SUCH AS ICE
AND WATER SHIELD, POLYMER TAPES. MASKING
AND WATER PROF LINING MATERIAL.
BARRIER MATERIAL SUCH AS PAPER OR FELT ARE
NOT RECOMMENDED. BARE GALVALUME PANS ARE
MOT RECOMMENDED.
CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL PANS PER
MANUFACTURE SPECS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
PENETRATION THROUGH THE BOTTOM OF THE
FLOOR JOIST ALLOWABLE SPANS
1. DESIGN LOADS ARE BASED ON 40 LBS/FT FOR LIVE LOAD AND
10 LBS/R FOR DEAD LOAD.
2. MOST VINYL OR COMPOSITE DECKING REWIRE A MAXIMUM JOIST
SPACING OF 16. O.C. CHECK WITH DECKING MANUFACTURER FOR
PROPER SPACING.
3. ALLOWABLE SPAN SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE PER
THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD
CONSTRUCTION 5 AS FOLLOWS:
SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE ALLOWABLE SPAN 40ULlIODL
ROOF RAFTER ALLOWABLE SPANS
1. DESIGN LOADS ARE BASED ON 20 LBS/FN FOR LIVE LOAD AND
10 LBS/FT' FOR DEAD LOAD.
2. SPRUCE PINE FIR ROOF PURLINS TO BE 24. O.C. uAX.
3. ALLOWABLE SPAN SPRUCE PINE FUR PER
THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD
CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS:
CROSSHEAD/GIRDER DESIGN NOTES
1. STRUCTURES WITH CROSSHEADS LENGTH LONGER THAN 6'
PILES MUST BE NOTCHED 1 1/2-
2. DESIGN LOADS ARE WED ON 40 LBS/FP FOR LIVE
LOAD AND 10 LBS/FN FOR DEAD LOAD.
3. ALLOWABLE WOOD STRESSES FOR SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE
PER THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD
CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS:
o. THE TABULATED RAFTER SPANS ASSUME THAT CEILING JOIST ARE LOCATED AT
THE BOTTOM OF THE ATTIC SPACE OR THAT SOME OTHER METHOD OF RESISTING
THE OUTWARD PUSH OF THE RAFTERS ON THE BEARING WALLS. SUCH AS
RAFTER TIES, 15 PROVIDED AT THAT LOCATION. WHEN CEILING JOIST OR RAFTER
TIES ARE LOCATED HIGHER IN THE ATTIC SPACE. THE RAFTER SPAN SHALL BE
MULTIPLIED BY FACTORS GIVEN BELOW.
140/141' RAFTER SPAN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
1/3
0.67
1/4
0.76
1/5
0.83
1/6
.90
1/7 OR LESS
1.00
1250
925
2X10
1050
BOO
2X12
1000
750
LAKE
z o
NORMAN
$ w
w o
J
s v
mrc
r F-
0 N w
LOCATION PLAN
a ¢3
J o
SCALE: 1"=50' RtH C CTO;'".,"
zz Y�
W
m
ALL PROPERLTY PROJECTION LINES ARE ESTIMATED`
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 1/3 THE COVE. 20'
Q
LLnw
ZLJ
U
W Z yOWNER
OFF ANY OTHER STRUCTURE AND EXAC7 LOCATION.
a
�ry g
OF PROJECTION LINE TO COMPLY WITH ALL DUKE So 6
POWER AND COUNTY REGULATIONS. OWNER IS TO ppfNGIM\
ROOF RAFTER ALLOWABLE SPANS
1. DESIGN LOADS ARE BASED ON 20 LBS/FN FOR LIVE LOAD AND
10 LBS/FT' FOR DEAD LOAD.
2. SPRUCE PINE FIR ROOF PURLINS TO BE 24. O.C. uAX.
3. ALLOWABLE SPAN SPRUCE PINE FUR PER
THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD
CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS:
CROSSHEAD/GIRDER DESIGN NOTES
1. STRUCTURES WITH CROSSHEADS LENGTH LONGER THAN 6'
PILES MUST BE NOTCHED 1 1/2-
2. DESIGN LOADS ARE WED ON 40 LBS/FP FOR LIVE
LOAD AND 10 LBS/FN FOR DEAD LOAD.
3. ALLOWABLE WOOD STRESSES FOR SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE
PER THE NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD
CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS:
o. THE TABULATED RAFTER SPANS ASSUME THAT CEILING JOIST ARE LOCATED AT
THE BOTTOM OF THE ATTIC SPACE OR THAT SOME OTHER METHOD OF RESISTING
THE OUTWARD PUSH OF THE RAFTERS ON THE BEARING WALLS. SUCH AS
RAFTER TIES, 15 PROVIDED AT THAT LOCATION. WHEN CEILING JOIST OR RAFTER
TIES ARE LOCATED HIGHER IN THE ATTIC SPACE. THE RAFTER SPAN SHALL BE
MULTIPLIED BY FACTORS GIVEN BELOW.
140/141' RAFTER SPAN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
1/3
0.67
1/4
0.76
1/5
0.83
1/6
.90
1/7 OR LESS
1.00
' HC - HEIGHT OF COUNG JOISTS OR RAFTER TIES MEASURED VERTK'ALLY ABOVE
THE TOP OF THE RAFTER SUPPORT BEAM/WALL
HT - HEIGHT OF ROOF RIDGE MEASURED VERTICALLY ABOVE THE TOP OF THE
RAFTER SUPPORT BEAM/WALL
PANS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED. I NOTE. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE PIAN MUST BE APPROVED BY DARDEN ENGINEERING SERVICES.
SYP Fb Volm (psi)
WOOD DOM.
/I 1
/2
2X4
1500
1100
2X6
1350
IODD
2X8
1250
925
2X10
1050
BOO
2X12
1000
750
4. THE SECTION MODULUS SX FOR DIMENSIONAL LUMBER PER THE
NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR WOOD CONSTRUCTION AS
FOLLOWS:
• 2z4- 3.063 IN'
• 2z6- 7.563 IN'
• 2X8- 13.14 IN'
• 2X10- 21.39 IN'
• 9X17- "R4 IN'
i O�RC
F w4,r rR
c5
FRANK WALLER
' oT 224 ALLENDALE CIR.
4 IREDELL COUNTY, NC
® Y 21
7 � FRr
T�
�MMIIFti �- 7
li lill'-did"i-d-d
zo
19 J Asa 3
* .mrd arJf • l as rw
d / -•{ BOARDw�
Y22.25•
s
. ab
Z In
w
" Yaw
b• OOw
a �
.. " " •�
Z v�ri
LAKE
z o
NORMAN
$ w
w o
J
s v
mrc
r F-
0 N w
LOCATION PLAN
a ¢3
J o
SCALE: 1"=50' RtH C CTO;'".,"
zz Y�
W
m
ALL PROPERLTY PROJECTION LINES ARE ESTIMATED`
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 1/3 THE COVE. 20'
Q
LLnw
ZLJ
U
W Z yOWNER
OFF ANY OTHER STRUCTURE AND EXAC7 LOCATION.
a
�ry g
OF PROJECTION LINE TO COMPLY WITH ALL DUKE So 6
POWER AND COUNTY REGULATIONS. OWNER IS TO ppfNGIM\
DE_
USE SURVEYOR TO PROPERLY LOCATE PIER TO v:ry C DNr
S Z
]
MEET DUKE ENERGY AND COUNTY REGULATIONS. .,,,,

IN
InS
IIIIIIIII _� A
11111111 ��yy
i uumn i l®lAl �
ninpii i
�I I�IIIIII � C -•.
Wim%//%%% �►� +�
I
��mnu
• r
war •
ANNOW
IF
A OCK AND PIER BUILDING FOR: APPROVED FOR CONTRACT
FRANK WALLER
es= . —IS
esu II'P.E.
MINN! iV
ENGINEERING SERVICES'
IREDELL COUNTY, NC u ` H �,
esu

2X10 C.H.
PT
2X10 C.H.
2x1
PT
2X10 C.H.
7177
2X10 CH
Ilim■E w
f IM
o'1
PT 5J•X11j• GLLI AM C.H.
PT 51'XIIJ" OLULAM C
I Pi 5f•XIIj• CLULAM C.H.
I
R
PT 5J-XIlj• GLULAM
19
:

<T- )-
-iii
•1��.�7/�.b.�D///.f>�1
br %-,%fZ@� _ al -i P �
.�..._. ///% __,-.- I i .. � .. �G///%/6'7///////s%///
►•.
1 :I
--I
C/1
�i///////e%///%>c�►Z��11>%//.f2�/////,ate////.►:•!�„
//✓
///.li'1
�C
W
I I
I I
'o O
I
�
I
G) _
c
�li
z
�
x
�
I
V
A
�
'
� � ,Il'I•ol
O
'T
G
m
oD
�
OZ
n
Z
ilm
mums
mmmmm
C-,Sf
A DOCK AND PIER BUILDING FOR:
APPROVED FOR CONTRACT
DEWN NO.
Vi
FRANK WALLER
'OHN C
DARDEN JR, P.E. ENGINEERING SERVICES
PRWWT NO.
1
ALL
224LL COUNTY,, NR
IRE COUNT
1F200
Y SCHOOL
RU„
$UITf 282
BY!
rA
TIA
_-t. N. C
281 1
ROOF FRAMING PLAN
0
�IECKW BY
JCD
o
LANCASTER CUSTOM DOCK AND LIFT
SYSTEMS N
O. DA"
SCALE: AS NOTED
9IV16
REVISIONS
-iii
•1��.�7/�.b.�D///.f>�1
br %-,%fZ@� _ al -i P �
.�..._. ///% __,-.- I i .. � .. �G///%/6'7///////s%///
►•.
1 :I
�i///////e%///%>c�►Z��11>%//.f2�/////,ate////.►:•!�„
//✓
///.li'1
I I
I I
I
�
I
�li
�

FASCIA C
METAL FRAME CONCRETE
DECKING
� O
Z_
Z �^
_ c r
FASCIA W
CONCRETE
DECKING O v
o METAL FRAME Z N� Z _
K w
2-1/2' GALV. n
Bas _
v
SEE DECK FRAMING
Z ,•
SEE DECK FRAMING PLAN FOR CORRECT SIZE S
PLAN FOR CORRECT SIZE FOR CRDSSHEAD (C.H.) -
1/2' GALV. BOLT, FOR CROSSHEAD (C.H.)
2-1/2- GALV.
BOLTS
B- ROUND
OR SOUARE
2 SECTION THRU FINGER$
S5 SCALE: NTS •6 3 �m
1O SECTION THRU FINGER i6 E
S-5 SCALE: NTS
3 TYPICAL FRAME
S-5 SCALE: NTS -
0
U
O
PIPES AND CABLES
TO BE SPACED SO
THAT A 4' SPHERE _
CANNOT PASS BETWEEN
SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN WHEN FORCE 5 APPLIED
FOR RIDGE SIZE
SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN
FOR RAFTER SIZE AND SPACING PT 2%10'
TOP CAP iTSi
O
1/2' GALV. BOLTS
TYPICAL rc
PT 2%B' RAFTER TIE METAL ROOF
1/2- GALV. BOLTS e k
ttPlcu � `� E
CONCRETE DECKING �// ,...� �� / •'.�
5/4 FASCIA
METAL FRAME
1/2' GALV. BOLTS
SEE SUB -ROOF FRAMING PUN TYPICAL = N
FOR CORRECT ROOF SEE FRAMING PLAN i 1/ ' GALV. BOL
BAND SIZE w� of G]
SIZE
Fr B' OR 10' a
ROUND OR SEE SUB -ROOF CTSI E z
m _ ARE BRACE PLAN FOR CORRECT SIZE J
1/2' GALV. BOLT. z Q
1/2' GALV. UG SCREW IS Lu N
ANACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTEBRACE LENGTH EQUALS °1 Q a z n j w
1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE < w� U i
ROOF MEASURED FROM THE s $z Z w
DECK TO THE BAND •P,VN LARp "• z Y
4" SECTION THRU ROOF
lL <w Z
S-5 SCALE: NTS 9 A25� i n LL
S In
s SECTION THRU DECK ROOF "•.,:./R,'cP ,, S-5 DF-
oAR4 ••; 7
NOTE: ANY DEVIATION FROM THE PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY DARDEN ENGINEERING SERVICES. •

1/2' GALV. BOLTS PT 2X10'
n
TYPICALTOP LAP
SEE SUB-ROOF FRAWNG
V
PLAN FOR CORRECT
mow,
ROOF BAND SIZE
Z
no'
SEE SUB-ROOF FRAWNG
1/2' GALV. PT 2X10'
w
N 2: PLAN FOR CORRECT
BOLTS TYPICAL TOP CAP
u
ROOF BAND SIZE
L N
_
I i*XBI LVL
2T.
TREATED
PT 2XIO
PT B' ND OR 10'
g 1/2'NO OR_ GALV. BOLT.
1/2 GALV. LAG SCREW IS
�� SEE SUB-ROOF FRAMING
-
w �� Z
SQUARE BRACE
ANACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE
PLAN FOR CORRECT SIZE
y _
o
11 Ali
BRACE LENGTH EQUALS
e
1/3 OF THE HEIGNi OF THE
0 1/2 CALV. BOLT.
ROOF MEASURED FROM THE
DECK TO THE BAND
n
ffiffiffi1/2_
' GALV. LAG SCREW IS
ANACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE
-
'
PT B' OR 10'
OR SQUARE
`a
=D
BRACE
7� ROOF SECTION DETAIL
BRACE LENGTH EQUALS
/3 OF THE HEW Of HE
ROOF MEASURED FROM THE
PT B' OR 10'�
S6 SCALE: NTS
DECK TO THE BAND
ROUND OR o
SQUARE BRACE
xx..
1/2• V. BOLT.
m'�c
T/2 W. uc SCREW s =
ANACCE ABLE SUBSTITUTE
8 ROOF SECTION DETAIL
BRACE LENGTH EQUALS
PIPES AND CABLES
S6 SCALE: MS
1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE
TO BE SPACED SO
*
G
m
ROOF MEASURED FROM THE
DECK TO THE BAND
TFL47 A X' SPHERE
CANNOT PASS BETWEEN
PIPES AND CABLES PER GUARDRAIL
TO BE SPACED SO MANUFACTURER
WHEN FORCE IS APPLIED
THAT A I' SPHERE
� ROOF
CANNOT PASS BETWEEN
SECTION DETAIL
WHEN FORCE IS APPLED
S6 SCALE: NTS
•
p
Y
zxe' rer1ER TYfM'11
O
or TxA' Tx• Low
EtEW R.1l1W
•
CONCRETE DECKING
CONCRETE DECKING
2
4
METAL FRAME
RAFTER TIEDOWN DETAIL
1/2' GALV. BOLTS„e `�
TYPICAL
METAL FRAME
a
S-6 SCALE: NTS
1/2' GLLv. BOLTS
TYPICAL
w
�o
SEE SUB-ROOF FRAMING
u}i
PUN FOR CORRECT SIZE
m ^ ¢
1/2' GALV. BOLT.
NOTCH PILE 3"
j
1/2' GALV. UC SCREW IS
FOR BEAM SUPPORT
O
ANACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE
N_ ¢
LENGTHEGUALSz
L
O (n
U
C)HE
HEIGHT OF T E
o LuQSURED
FROM T EOTO THE BAND
m J z
Q 0, O
10 UPPER DECK SECTION DETAIL
11 UPPER DECK SECTION DETAIL
Q a J
o ew
Q U w
Z J
S y
S-6 SCALE: NTS
® SCALE: NTS _ 9i
a LL n
LL
NOTE'ANY
DEVIATION FROM THE PLAN MUST BE APPROVED By DARDEN ENGINEERING SERVICES. """'•."'

grgigo
�W
0
D
r
-n
I r
m
O
cci
I�
y
g
0
�i
A DOCK AND PIER BUILDING FOR:
APPROVED FOR CONTRACT
DESIGN N0.
Vi
FRANK WALLER
dN C. DARDEN JR, P.E. ENGINEERING SERVICES
PRO,IECT NO
224 ALLENDALE CIR
IREDELL COUNTY. NC
1, 2H
BRAWLLY SCHOOL RL),, SUITE 202
oN[
T.. -By
TM
^lk",!LLt N C ?R 1
BOARDWALK
p
cNECKED B
_
LANCASTER CUSTOM DOCK AND LIFT SYSTEMS
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
SCALE: AS NOTED
" `
REVISIONS

SAW -2016-01520
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2016-01520 County: Iredell
NO DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED
Property Owner: Frank Waller
ROCA Company
Address: 165 Harborview Drive
Stout, OH, 45652
Telephone Number: 740-259-2350
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc): 0.393 -acre dredge area. 224
Allendale Circle, Troutman, NC 28166.
Description of Activity: Dredging material using an excavator from edge of Lake Norman to create
a boat dock slit). The dredged materials will be deposited into a dump truck and deposited into
upland area.
Your work as proposed does not require Department of the Army authorization for the following
reason(s):
_ There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands within the boundaries of the property.
_ The proposed project does not impact jurisdictional waters or wetlands.
X The proposed project is exempt from Department of the Army regulation.
Specify: The proposed activity does not appear to involve a discharge of dredge or fill materials
which could trigger authorization under the Clean Water Act Section 404.
This Department of the Army determination does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain
any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact
appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work, you must contact the N.C.
Division of Coastal Management in Washington, North Carolina, at [phone] to discuss any
required State authorization.
Any changes in the above described work must be coordinated with the Corps of Engineers prior to
commencement. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please
contact Jason Randolph at telephone number 704-510-1440 or [e-mail].
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date- n7 Ren ?n1F

SAW -2016-01520
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
littp://regulatory.LtsaceSLtrvey.coni/

Sep 22. 16 10:34a
Water Resources
L-NVA0Nt'LNIAL QUALI-Y
2 August 2016
p.1
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
DWR 4 16-0721
Iredell County
Frank Waller
ROCA Company
16S Harborview Dr.
Stout, OH 45652
Subject: Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions;
Dredge, Allendale Circle, Lot 20, Lake Norman
Dear Mr, Waller,
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your application dated
June 15, 2016 and received by the Division of Water Resources (Division) on July 25, 2016. These impacts
are covered by the Water Quality General Certification Number 3898 (attached), and the additional
conditions listed below. This Certification is associated with the use of Regional Permit Number
198200030 issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and expires on the same day. Please note thatyou
should obtain any other applicable federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project,
including those required by (but not limited to) the local lake management authority, erosion and
sediment control, non -discharge, and water supply watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed Certification, the General
Permit, and the following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification are met. No other impacts are approved, including
incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Type of Impact
Amount Approved (sq. ft.) permanent
Open Waters (dredge)
1710 sq. ft.
Buffer
0 sq. ft.
Shoreline length
0 ft.
2. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If
you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit
a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new
Sure of North Cmhm i Envirmm nuI Quality i Water Resource I Water Quality Regional Operanans
Mooresville Regional Ofr"I 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Mooresville,Noah Care11r0]8115
704 60 1699

Sep 22. 16 10:34a
p.2
owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and Certification and is responsible for
complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02H.0506 and 15A NCAC 02B.0243(8)1
3. The Division's Mooresville Regional Office (610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301,
Mooresville, NC 28115) shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved
impact areas has commenced. [15A NCAC 02H.0502 (e)]
4. Any access corridor shall not exceed 10 feet in width and shall be restored to its original
condition prior to the project. [15A NCAC 02B.0243(6)]
5. All staging, including spoil, stockpile and construction materials, shall occur outside of the
buffer. [15A NCAC 02B .0243(4)]
6. All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse or sheet flow (not piped) at non-erosive
velocities through the protected lake buffer and should not re -concentrate before
discharging into the lake. [15A NCAC 02B .0243(5)]
7. The applicant and/or authorized agent shall provide a completed Certificate of Completion
Form to the DWR 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit within ten days of project completion.
(available at: http //portal ncdenr ors/web/wq/swpfws/401/`certsandpermits/apply/forms) or
see attached. [15A NCAC 02H.0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02B.0243(8)]
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by filing a
written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereby known as
OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH
Clerk's Office at [phone] for information.
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition
is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received
in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm, excluding
official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at(919)431-3100, provided the original and one copy of the petition
along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business days following the
faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
if sending via US Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel

Sep 22 16 10:34a
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
p.3
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Catawba
Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0243. Please contact Alan Johnson at 704-663-1699
or a [e-mail] if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Enclosures
cc: Lancaster Dock/Dredge (email)
DWR MRO - file copy
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit — (email)

Sep 22 16 10:35a
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
p.4
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules; and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the. 401
Transportation Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's
authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules,
the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, __ , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules,
the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of
the project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved
plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.

( 1`• rel ..�
Water Resources
1-1I-.111. .111. 1 nl..-1I 1
2 August 2016
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
l)lrt llul
D W R It 16.0721
Iredell County
Frank Waller
ROCA Company
165 Harborview Dr.
Stout, OH 45652
Subject: Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions;
Dredge, Allendale Circle, Lot 20, Lake Norman
Dear Mr. Waller,
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your application dated
June 15, 2016 and received by the Division of Water Resources (Division) on July 25, 2016. These impacts
are covered by the Water Quality General Certification Number 3898 (attached), and the additional
conditions listed below. This Certification is associated with the use of Regional Permit Number
198200030 issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and expires on the same day. Please note that you
should obtain any other applicable federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project,
Including those required by (but not limited to) the local lake management authority, erosion and
sediment control, non -discharge, and water supply watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed Certification, the General
Permit, and the following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification are met. No other impacts are approved, including
incidental impacts. (15A NCACO2H .05O6(b), 15A NCAC O2H .0507(c)
Type of Impact
Amount Approved (sq. ft.) permanent
Open Waters (dredge)
1710 sq. ft.
Buffer
0 sq. ft.
Shoreline length
Oft.
2. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If
you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit
a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new
Sum d'Na C-1-I&mmw 1Q1.14I W--M--I W-0-MI
wRaWp1 o&4610P,tGory Aw S.0501 I Moa Wl.. NWC di 18115
]01861 1698

owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and Certification and is responsible for
complying with all conditions. (15A NCAC 02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 0213.0243(8)]
3. The Division's Mooresville Regional Office (610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301,
Mooresville, NC 28115) shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved
impact areas has commenced. [15A NCAC 02H.0502 (e)]
4. Any access corridor shall not exceed 10 feet In width and shall be restored to its original
condition prior to the project. [15A NCAC 02B.0243(6))
5. All staging, including spoil, stockpile and construction materials, shall occur outside of the
buffer. [15A NCAC 02B.0243(4)1
6. All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse or sheet flow (not piped) at non-erosive
velocities through the protected lake buffer and should not re -concentrate before
discharging into the lake. [15A NCAC 028.0243(5)1
7. The applicant and/or authorized agent shall provide a completed Certificate of Completion
Form to the DWR 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit within ten days of project completion.
(available at: htto•//i)ortal ncdenr ore/web/wa/swo/ws/401/certsandoermits/aooly/forms) or
see attached. [35A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 028.0243(8)]
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 1508 by filing a
written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereby known as
OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at htto://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH
Clerk's Office at [phone] for information.
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition
is considered Flied when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received
In the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday between 8:O0am and 5:O0pm, excluding
official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one copyofthe petition
along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business days following the
faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
if sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc):
office of Administrative Hearings
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served to DENR:
Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel

Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Catawba
Riparian Buffer Rules as described In 15A NCAC 02B.0243. Please contact Alan Johnson at 704-663-1699
or [e-mail] ifyou have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
�.yws<�rc�yd-
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
water Quality Regional operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
Enclosures
cc: Lancaster Dock/Dredge (email)
DWR MRO - file copy
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit— (email)

NCDWR Project No.: Comity:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of lasuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401
Transportation Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. this form may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's
authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Cerdficadon
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules,
the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certlfleadon
Date:
I, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules,
the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineers Cerdfreadon
Partial Final
Date:
I, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of
the project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved
plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator Office of Archives and History
Governor Pat McCrory Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Secretary Susan Kluttz
August 23, 2016
Frank Waller
ROCA Company
165 Harborview Drive
Stout, OH 45652
Re: Dredge Boat Access Channel, 224 Allendale Circle, Troutman, Lake Norman, Iredell County,
ER 16-1280
Dear Mr. Waller:
Thank you for your application concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
t�Rarnona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Catawba Indian Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730
Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]
August 10, 2016
Attention: Donna P. Hrko
Lancaster Custom Dock & Lift Systems
1156 Perth Road
Troutman, NC 28166
Re. THPO # TCNS # Project Description
2016-287-4 ROCA Company (Frank Waller, Pres.) 224 Allendale Circle, Troutman, NC
Dear Ms. Hrko,
The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questions please contact Caitlin Totherow at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-
mail [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

ZONING PERMIT
Residential
IREDELL COUNTY
PO Box 788
349 North Center St.
Statesville, NC 28677
APPLICATION NUMBER
222468
Issue Date: 10/13/2016
Parcel Number
Street "Address
Jurisdiction
4628697676.000
224 ALLENDALE CIRCLE, TROUTMAN, NC
IREDELL COUNTY
Owner Information '
Applicant Information
Owner: ROCA COMPANY
Applicant: LANCASTER'S CUSTOM DOC
Address: PO BOX 157
Address: 1156 PERTH ROAD
MCDERMOTT, OH 45652
TROUTMAN, NC 28166
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Use Requested
Zone Code
REPLACE EXISTING WITH FIXED PIER, COVERED BOAT HOUSE, FUN
DECK, SEATING AREA, WALKWAY
R20
Lot Acreage F Setback B Setback L Setback R SetbackWatershed Flood Zone
CACL AE
Remarks•
Pier Zoning Permit: Shall comply with the shoreline management guidelines of the Lake Management
Division of Duke Energy Company.
The applicant certifies that there are no deed restrictions, contractual agreements or governmental
regulations of any kind that interfere with or prohibit the use of the property or the use for which this
permit is requested. The applicant further acknowledges that enforcement of deed restrictions, plat
conditions and other contractual agreements will not be undertaken by Iredell County and is the sole
responsibility of the affected parties.
Applicant:
Date:
Permit Number 83076 TOTAL FEES: $ 77.25

IREDELL COUNTY
PO Box 788
349 North Center St.
Statesville, NC 28677
Permit Type: BUILDING -SINGLE FAMILY
APPLICATION NUMBER
222468
Issue Date: 10/13/2016
Owner Information' Applicant Information
Name: ROCA COMPANY Name: LANCASTER'S CUSTOM DOC
Phone: Phone: [phone]
Contrac#or Information
Name: LANCASTER'S CUSTOM DOCK & LIFT SYSTEMS I License Type License Number
Address: 1156 PERTH ROAD BLDG 49723-L
Phone: [phone]
BUllding Information
Proposed Use: R-3 RESIDENTIAL Heated Sq. Ft:
Construction Type: 5B Unheated Sq. Ft: 1,000
Number of Stories: Gross Sq. Ft: 1,000
Estimated Cost of Construction: $ 17,160
Permit Details:
BLANKET BUILDING Amount: 116.69
TECHNOLOGY FEE Amount: 3.80
Amount:
Amount:
Amount:
Amount:
Amount:
Project Description: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - IREDELL
Scope of Work:
REPLACE EXISTING WITH FIXED PIER, COVERED BOAT HOUSE, FUN
DECK, SEATING AREA, WALKWAY
I hereby certify that all information in this application is correct and all work will comply with the state code and all other applicable state and
local laws, ordinances and regulations. The respective department will be notified of any changes in the approved plans, a change of
contractor, and/or specifications for the project permitted herein. This application becomes a permit only when validated and approved.
Date: 10/13/2016
Signature of Owner/Contractor
ANY PERMIT ISSUED EXPIRES SIX (6) MONTHS AFTER ISSUANCE IF NO INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE.
ANY PERMIT ISSUED SHALL EXPIRE TWELVE (12) MONTHS AFTER LAST INSPECTION /F THE WORK IS
DISCONTINUED.
Permit Number 183077 TOTAL FEES, $ 120.49