20160285 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160627

ENVIRON, IEN'T'AI. SERA ICES, INC.
4901 TRADEMARK DRI\'f:
R:\LLIGH, 'FORTH CAROLINA 27610
919-212-1760 * FAX [phone]
www.environmentalservicesinc.com
June 22, 2016
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Oak Pointe (DWR # 16-0285)
Response to Request for Additional Information
401 Individual Water Quality Certification Application
Town of Apex, Wake County, NC
Environmental Services, Inc. is submitting three (3) copies of the enclosed revised Individual Permit
application package on behalf of Lennar Corporation for jurisdictional impacts associated with the Oak
Pointe development. This application has been revised due to a change in the owner/applicant for the
project and in response to your Request for Additional Information dated May 5, 2016.
Please contact Tim Spangler at Spangler Environmental, Inc. at [phone] or me at [phone] if
you have any additional questions or comments. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Environmental Services, Inc.
Robert Turnbull
Senior Manager
Attachments: Revised Individual Permit application package

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL NO.
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARYRY 20 20133
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332, Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Mitch Middle - Last - Barron
First - Robert Middle - Last - Turnbull
Company - Lennar Corporation
Company - Environmental Services, Inc.
E-mail [e-mail]
E-mail [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 909 Aviation Parkway, 4700
Address- 4901 Trademark Drive
City - Morrisville State - NC Zip - 27560 Country -US
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27610 Country -US
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
919-337-9444
919-212-1760 919-212-1707
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Robert Turnbull, ESI to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this apple nd to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application. g1
David Barron _ - 2016-06-15
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) & BUFf p i P4P7 t tN(�
Oak Pointe
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Beaver Creek
Address Old Jenks Road
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 35.75568 Longitude: �W 78.87222
City - Apex State- NC Zip -
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID See attached list Municipality Town of Apex
Section - N/A Township - White Oak Range - N/A
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
The property is located on Old Jenks Road in Apex, NC, approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of West Williams Street (NC -55)
and Old Jenks Road.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
Construction of residential neighborhood consisting of single-family residential lots. See attachments for details.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the project is to construct infrastructure necessary to access proposed residential lots. See attachments for details.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
See attachments.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See attachments
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 0.97
or
Linear Feet 377
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See attachments.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? ❑Yes ®No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
a. Address- See attachment
City - State - Zip -
b. Address -
City - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State Zip -
d.Address-
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
-7 (3 ?12
_
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies; conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

I/We l � �� t �� �-� � .�k �; , � the owner(s) of the (Owner Name)
property commonly identified as _ ��_- � �,iti� r-�t�J � i�� t j tv�3 6 6,L- & +`JO P-0? o
Y� (street)
CDC C,,ty`% State of �bl?4x-tVVh r
(City/Town) (County)
hereby grant, freely and without coercion, the right of access and entry to said property to
Environmental Services, Inc., including but not limited to its employees, contractors,
subcontractors and any applicable regulatory agency personnel, for the purpose of
envirorunental, ecological or archaeological assessments.
This access agreement is effective upon signature and shall remain in effect until such time as
assessment activities are completed, including any ancillary activities associated with said
activities.
Enviromnental Services, Inc. is also granted the right to act as my authorized agent for the
purposes of conducting this site review and fixture consultation with regulatory agencies
For the consideration and purposes set forth herein, Me hereby acknowledge, accept and agree
to the terms of the Right of Entry Agreement as evidenced by my dated signature below.
Signed this
g �L_ day of _ �.�y 2016.
Print Name: 1. (`C �!kIZCZt r 1i t iJ �V21�"tilt
Signature:

Section 404/401 Individual Permit Application
Oak Pointe
i M P
Version 2
Submitted By:
Lennar Corporation
919. Pkwy #700
Morrisville, NC 27560
ITRWO111mi

'TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1
Prior Agency Coordination
2.0
PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT
3.0
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS . - -
3.1
Alternatives Considered
3.1.1 No Build Alternative
3.1.2 No Permit Alternative
3.1.3 Proposed Site Plan (Preferred Alternative)- -------------------------
3.1.4 Alternative Site Plans
3.1.5 Off-site Alternatives --------------------- ------------------------
3.2
Alternatives Dismissed ------------------------------------------------------------------
4.0
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE -----------
4.1
Physiographic, Topographic, Geology, and Land Use -------_---_----
4.2
Soils --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.3
Water Resources
4.4
Wetlands --.
Threatened and Endangered Species. ----------------------------- --_---------------
4.6
Cultural Resources - --
5.0
SECTION
404 IMPACTS AND PERMITTING -------------------------------------------
5.1
Proposed Stream Impacts -----------------------------------------------------------------
5.1.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Stream Impacts -------- -----------
5.2
Proposed Wetland Impacts -------------- ----------------------------------------------
5.2.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Wetland Impacts __-----_-_---.
5.3
Proposed Riparian Buffer Impacts ------- ----- ------_------------------------_------
5.3.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Riparian Buffer Impacts ------
5.4
Compensatory Mitigation ------------------------ ------------------------------------ -
5.5
Phase I ESA
6.0
REFERENCES
2
3
- 3.
4
4
4
---------- 4
------------ 5--
------------
6
------------
6
----------6.
6
6
7.
7.
------------10
10
------------10
-----------10
------------ 1-2.
--12
--14
------------14--
-----------15
APPENDIX A: Figures 1-3
APPENDIX B: Town of Apex Riparian Buffer Letter and Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate
APPENDIX C: USFWS Concurrence Letter
APPENDIX D: SI -IPO Clearance Letter
APPENDIX E: Compensatory Mitigation Letters
APPENDIX F: NCWAM and NCSAM Evaluations
APPENDIX G: FEMA CLOMR Letters
APPENDIX H: Construction Drawings and Sequences
APPENDIX L• Phase I ESA Executive Summary
Oak Pointe Property

1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lennar Corporation (Lennar) proposes the construction of a residential neighborhood, Oak Pointe.
The proposed Oak Pointe development is located in Apex on Old Jenks Road, approximately 1,000
feet east of the intersection of Old Jenks Road and West Williams Street (NC -55) in Wake County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). The 58.04 -acre project area consists of mixed hardwood and mixed
pine/hardwood communities, one (1) jurisdictional pond, and previously verified jurisdictional streams
and wetlands.
The Oak Pointe project area consists of seven parcels that are currently owned by Lennar. These
parcels are all currently zoned as Medium Density Residential by the Town of Apex. Per the Town of
Apex Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), the Medium Density Residential zoning district
provides land for medium density single-family residential uses at densities up to 6 units per acre. The
site is bisected by Beaver Creek, a major tributary to Jordan Lake. Phase 1 of the Oak Pointe
development is on the northwest side of Beaver Creek and Phase 2 is located on the southeast side of
Beaver Creek (Figure 1).
The proposed residential development construction activities involve unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and streams that are subject to Section 404 regulations under the Clean Water
Act (CWA). Lennar is submitting an Individual Permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) requesting authorization to permanently impact 0.97 acre of wetlands and 377
linear feet of stream channel pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA of 1972 (33 USC 1344). An
Individual Water Quality Certification will also be requested from the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (DWR) for these impacts pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The
initial Individual Permit application for this project was submitted by K. Hovnanian Homes in March
2016. Lennar has purchased the property from K. Hovnanian Homes and is now the applicant for this
permit application. This document is being submitted in response to agency comments regarding the
initial permit application.
The purpose of this document is to provide an evaluation of three general criteria which will be
considered as part of the permit process: 1) the relative extent of the public and private need for the
proposed activity; 2) the practicability of using reasonable alternative locations and methods to
accomplish the objective of the proposed activity; and 3) the extent of the effects which the proposed
activity is likely to have on the public and private uses to which the area is suited, including
environmental impacts. This document is intended for use by USACE and DWR as the basis for
determining the applicant's compliance with the Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines and other Section 404
permitting requirements, and Section 401 water quality certification.
1.1 Prior Agency Coordination
Prior coordination with USACE regarding this project includes:
• February 23, 2015 - Initial 206 -acre parcel delineation results reviewed by James Lastinger of
USACE.
• January 15, 2016 — Met with James Lastinger of USACE to review project area and discuss
potential impacts.
• March 23, 2016 — Public Notice for the initial individual permit proposal advertised by the
USACE
Oak Pointe Property 2

• April 29, 2016 — Comments received from the USAGE, NCWRC, and public on initial
Individual Permit application submitted by K. Hovnanian Homes
• May 5, 2016 — Comments received from DWR on the initial hndividual Permit application
submitted by K. Hovnanian Homes
2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The purpose of this project is to establish 96 residential lots on the Oak Pointe property and to
construct the infrastructure necessary to access these residential lots on the Oak Pointe property. 96
lots are needed to make the project financially viable for the. The purpose of the proposed roads on
the property is to allow traffic into the development from Old Jenks Road and Thorn Hollow Drive
and to allow traffic to flow smoothly through the development. The proposed greenway on the
property will connect to the Town of Apex greenway system and allow for foot traffic to access
existing greenway trails. A sewer easement is proposed near the southern end of the property to allow
single-family homes in Oak Pointe to connect to the Town of Apex sewer system.
3.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Headquarters of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE) guidance from April 22, 1986 and
November 1992 requires that alternatives be practicable to the applicant and that the purpose and need
for the project must be the applicant's purpose and need. This guidance also states that project
purpose is to be viewed from the applicant's perspective rather than only from the broad, public
perspective. The essential point of the HQUSACE policy guidance is that under the Section 404(b)(1)
Guidelines, an alternative must be available to the applicant to be a practicable alternative. Section 40
CFR 23 0. 10 (a) of the Guidelines state that "no discharge of dredged or fill material shall be permitted
if there is a practicable alternative to the proposed discharge which would have less adverse impact on
the aquatic ecosystem, so long as the alternative does not have other significant environmental
consequences". Pursuant to 40 CFR 230.10(a)(2) practicable alternatives are those alternatives that
are "available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and
logistics in light of overall project purpose". The 404(b)(1) Guidelines Preamble, "Economic
Factors", 45 Federal Register 85343 (December 24, 1980) states, "if an alleged alternative is
unreasonably expensive to the applicant, the alternative is not practicable".
Although sufficient information must be developed to determine whether the proposed activity is in
fact the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative (LEDPA), the Guidelines do not
require an elaborate search for practicable alternatives where, as here, it can be reasonably anticipated
that there are only minor differences between the environmental impacts of the proposed activity and
potentially practicable alternatives. Those alternatives that do not result in discernibly less impact to
the aquatic ecosystem may be eliminated from the analysis since section 230.10(a) of the Guidelines
only prohibits discharges when a practicable alternative exists which would have less adverse impact
on the aquatic ecosystem. Since evaluating practicability is generally the more difficult aspect of the
alternatives analysis, this approach should save time and effort for both the applicant and the
regulatory agency. By initially focusing the alternatives analysis on the question of impacts to the
aquatic ecosystem, it may be possible to limit, or eliminate altogether, the number of alternatives
which have to be evaluated for practicability.
Oak Pointe Property 3

Since Lennar purchased the Oak Pointe property from K. Hovnanian Homes in April 2016 after site
planning and multiple government approvals had been obtained, it should be noted that Lennar is not
afforded the opportunity to do major plan amendments without significant financial losses.
3.1 Alternatives Considered
Lennar has identified alternatives as part of this evaluation and each are discussed in more detail in the
following sections. These alternatives include a no build alternative, no permit alternatve, the
preferred alternative (proposed site), alternative site designs, and off-site alternatives.
3.1.1 No Build Alternative
A no build alternative is here considered to be one where no development occurs on the Oak
Pointe property. No neighborhood infrastructure would be constructed and no residential lots
would be established on the property. The applicant would not be able to sell lots or build
single-family homes on the property, and would not be able to capitalize on their asset. A no
build decision on the property would not meet the applicant's purpose and need.
3.1.2 No Permit Alternative
The no permit alternative is here considered to be a construction plan that avoids all wetland
and surface water impacts. Due to the constraints dictated by the site topography and land -
grading requirements, this project cannot be downsized or redesigned to avoid all
jurisdictional areas and still satisfy the project purpose and need. A no permit decision on this
property would not meet the applicant's purpose and need.
3.1.3 Proposed Site Plan (Preferred Alternative)
The Oak Pointe development is designed to accommodate 96 residential lots. This layout
allows the applicant to make the residential development financially viable and stay within the
zoning guidelines as defined in the Town of Apex UDO. The design team believes that the
neighborhood design presented in this permit application represents the most practicable and
least environmentally damaging alternative while still maintaining the applicant's purpose and
need.
The road construction that will result in the proposed wetland and stream impacts is necessary
to allow suitable access to all lots. The design of the development has placed the road
corridors so that all lots are accessible, traffic flow is optimized, and impacts to jurisdictional
features are minimized as much as practicable.
The proposed greenway that crosses the property will provide connection to the existing Town
of Apex greenway system. During the preliminary design process for this property, the
location of this greenway was originally located adjacent to the existing Town of Apex sewer
easement throughout the property. It was determined that wetland impacts could be
minimized by moving a portion of the greenway corridor near Pointe Crossing to avoid most
of the large wetland in this area.
The proposed sewer easement located at the southern end of the property is necessary to
provide a connection between the residential lots in Oak Pointe and the existing Town of Apex
sewer system. The easement crosses Town of Apex property and the Town has approved this
connection.
Oak Pointe Property 4

Removal of large trees will be avoided and planting of native species during construction will
be done as much as practicable. Best management practices will be used for all sediment and
erosion control before, during, and after construction.
3.1.4 Alternative Site Plans
During the design process for the Oak Pointe development, several alternative layouts were
considered that would produce varying amounts of jurisdictional impacts. These
considerations included the following:
• Omission of the crossing on Pointe Crossing over Beaver Creek was considered. If a
traffic connection between Phase I and 2 of the development was not constructed,
traffic would not be able to flow through the development and there would be limited
access to each Phase. It is also a requirement of the Town of Apex that there be two
access points into a residential development for safety reasons.
® Removal of lots to avoid jurisdictional impacts was considered. However, this would
not allow the applicant to have the needed 96 lots on the property and would prevent
the project from being financially viable for Lennar.
® Consideration was given to moving the location of the Pointe Crossing corridor over
Beaver Creek upstream in order to further minimize the amount of wetland impacts
resulting from the road crossing. However, moving the crossing closer to the adjacent
upstream property would require a no rise situation on the flood study to avoid
hydrologic trespass during high flow events. In addition, there is not adequate spacing
for the road itself to cross the riparian buffers at a perpendicular angle and then be
able to make a safe turn toward the southern portion of the property.
• The location of the sewer easement could have been moved further upstream and onto
the Oak Pointe property. However, this location was chosen and approved by the
Town of Apex. Alternative locations would have either resulted in increased
jurisdictional impacts and/or not allowed for adequate connection between the single-
family homes and the Town of Apex sewer system.
After significant planning and consultation with the development team, it is believed that
alternative site plan designs for Oak Pointe are not able to meet the purpose and need of the
applicant.
3.1.5 Of Alternatives
The Town of Apex has seen significant growth in development of all kinds in recent years.
Available parcels are scarce and are not necessarily zoned for the single-family residential
community that is proposed at Oak Pointe. Lennar did not identify any other parcels that
would provide the same amount of buildable land, allow for a layout that is financially viable,
or that would result in fewer impacts to jurisdictional features. The land cost for this property
was less than other development opportunities in the planning district. The location of the
Oak Pointe property is also closer to transportation via NC 55 and US 64 than other
development opportunities in the planning district. Other available parcels did not have the
readily available access to the Town of Apex outfall sewer facility that is located at Oak
Oak Pointe Property 5

Pointe. The purchase and development and any off-site alternative would not meet the
purpose and need of the applicant.
3.2 Alternatives Dismissed
The no build alternative, no permit alternative, alternative site plans, and off-site alternatives are all
dismissed from further evaluation because they cannot practicably meet the applicant's stated purpose
and need.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
This section presents existing environmental conditions of the project study area and discusses
environmental impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The project study area has been
visited several times by ESI and agency personnel to evaluate existing conditions and to document
physical and biological resources. The site is located on Old Jenks Road in Wake County, east of the
intersection of Old Jenks Road and West Williams Street (NC -55). Refer to Figure 1 for a Project
Location Map. Total size of the project study area is 58.04 acres.
4.1 Physiographic, Topography, Geology, and Land Use
The project study area is located on the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangles of Cary, NC (USGS 1986). More specifically the site is located in the Town of Apex
between US Highway 64 and Old Jenks Road. Wake County is in the central part of the piedmont
physiographic providence of North Carolina.
Elevations on the site range from a low of approximately 340 feet above mean sea level (MSL) within
the Beaver Creek floodplain to a high of approximately 400 feet above MSL near Old Jenks Road.
The Oak Pointe property is located in the Triassic Basin Chatham Group, undivided, within the
piedmont physiographic region (NCDENR 1985). The project study area is located in the Cape Fear
River Basin.
4.2 Soils
The Soil Survey of* Wake County, North Carolina (USDA 1970) (Figure 2) depicts the following soil
mapping units within the study area: Creedmoor sandy loam (2 to 6 percent slopes), Creedmoor sandy
loam (2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded), Creedmoor sandy loam (6 to 10 percent slopes), Creedmoor
sandy loam (10 to 20 percent slopes), Mayodan sandy loam (10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded),
Mayodan gravelly sandy loam (6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded), Welladkee and Bibb soils, and
Worsham sandy loam. These are combined into the Mayodan-Granville-Creedmoor association soil
association, which is comprised of gently sloping to hilly, deep and moderately deep, moderately well
drained soils that have a very fine clayey subsoil; derived from sandstone, shale, and mudstone.
4.3 Water Resources
The project study area is in subbasin 05 of the Cape Fear River Basin and is located in USGS
hydrologic unit 03030002 (USDA 2012, NCDWR 2010). There are no riparian buffer rules within the
Cape Fear River Basin. The Town of Apex Riparian Buffer Rules place restrictions on certain
development within 50 feet of intermittent stream channels and within 100 feet of perennial stream
channels that are depicted on the most recent version of the USGS quadrangle map (Figure 1) or on
Oak Pointe Property 6

the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) county soils map for Wake County (Figure 2).
Six stream channels, including Beaver Creek, and one pond are mapped within the study area on either
USGS or NRCS mapping. Mike Deaton of the Town of Apex reviewed the Oak Pointe Property on
August 18, 2014 and determined that four intermittent stream channels (SPA, SD, SLC, SLA) would
be subject to the 50 foot buffer, one perennial stream channel (SE) would be subject to the 100 foot
buffer, and one ephemeral stream channel (SLB) is not subject to the Town of Apex Riparian Buffer
Rules. The Stream Buffer Determination Letter from the Town of Apex, dated September 3, 2014, is
included in Appendix B. The pond within the study area was previously evaluated by the USACE and
Town of Apex and determined to non jurisdictional and is not subject to the Town of Apex Riparian
Buffer Rules.
A Best Usage Classification (BUC) is assigned to waters of North Carolina based on the existing or
contemplated best usage of various bodies of water. There are eight jurisdictional stream channels
within the project study area. The jurisdictional streams in the study area are associated with Beaver
Creek. Beaver Creek, from its source to NC Hwy 55 [Stream Identification # 16-41-10-(0.3)], has a
BUC of WS-IV;NSW. WS -IV waters are used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or
food processing purposes. The supplemental classification NSW designates Nutrient Sensitive Waters
which require limitations on nutrient inputs.
4.4 Wetlands
Four wetland systems were identified onsite that are subject to Section 404 jurisdiction pursuant to the
USACE Jurisdictional Determination from February 2015. The wetlands within the project study area
are characterized as a complex of Bottomland Hardwood Forests and Headwater Forests per the North
Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM).
4.5 Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the federal classifications of Endangered (E), or Threatened (T), are protected under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Five (5) species are
listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as having a range that is considered to extend
into Wake County (list date 4/2/2015) (USFWS 2013): bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
northern long-eared bat (Myotic septentrionalis), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf
wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), and Michaux's sunac (Rhus michauxii).
Bald eagle — Bald eagles typically nest in tall, living trees in a conspicuous location near water and
forage over large bodies of water with adjacent trees available for perching. Bald eagles typically feed
on fish but may also consume birds and small mammals. In the Carolinas, nesting season extends
from December through May.
The bald eagle was officially delisted and removed from the federal Endangered Species List on
August 9, 2007, but they are still protected under the federal BGPA and the MBIA. The National
Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (Guidelines) prohibit disturbance to a bald eagle. The Guidelines
define disturb as "to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to
cause, based on the best scientific information available: 1) injury to an eagle; 2) a decrease in its
productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior; or 3)
nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior"
Oak Pointe Property 7

The definition also covers impacts that result from human -caused alterations initiated around a
previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagles return, such
alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that injures an eagle or interferes with normal
breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior.
Under the current Guidelines, USFWS recommends the following measures for roads, trails, canals,
power lines, and other linear utilities. If the eagle nest can be seen from the project site and there is no
similar activity within 660 feet, then USFWS recommends that the project: 1) maintain a buffer of at
least 660 feet between your activities and the nest; 2) maintain any established landscape buffers; and
3) if possible, create additional landscape buffers to screen the new activity from the nest. If these
recommendations cannot be adopted for the project, then coordination is recommended with the local
USFWS office (USFWS 2007).
Habitat Present: No
The study area does not include any large open water habitat that would provide nesting or
foraging opportunities. The proposed project will have no effect on this species. A review of
NCNHP records, updated October 2015, indicates no known occurrence of bald eagle within
1.0 mile of the study area.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Northern long-eared bat — In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the
mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North Carolina,
NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not known to be a long-
distance migrant and caves and subterranean mines are extremely rare in eastern North Carolina, it is
uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB
roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dean trees
(typically >3 inches dbh). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in structures like barns
and sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging
occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along
tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat type for foraging (USFWS 2014).
Habitat Present: Yes
Potential summer roosting habitat in the form of hardwood trees greater than 3 inches dbh
does exist within the study area. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2015,
indicates no known occurrence of northern long-eared bat within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Because the trees to be removed are not documented maternal roosting sites or foraging
habitat, and no known summer roosting sites or winter hibernacula sites are documented
within 3 miles, the project should result in a biological conclusion of May Affect — Not Likely
to Adversely Affect. A concurrence letter from USFWS, dated August 7, 2015, is included as
Appendix C. Based on the USFWS Key to the NLEB 4(d) Rule for Non -Federal Activities,
this project should be exempt from USFWS Consultation.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect — Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Oak Pointe Property 8

Red -cockaded woodpecker — The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open, mature
stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine, for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The
RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which are
contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of
the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 mile (USFWS 2003).
Habitat Present: No
Suitable foraging and/or nesting habitat for the RCW does not exist within the study area. The
study area lacks the open mature pine dominated community habitat associated with nesting
for this species and lacks pine stands greater than 30 years old required for foraging. A
review of NCNHP records, updated October 2015, indicates no known occurrence of RCW
within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Dwarf wedgemussel — The dwarf wedgemussel is typically 1.5 inches in length or smaller with a
brown or yellowish brown outer surface. This mussel species typically inhabits streams with moderate
flow velocities and substrates varying in texture from gravel to coarse sand to mud with little silt
deposition (USFWS 1993a).
Habitat Present: No
Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel is not present within the project study area. The
streams within the study area are not part of the Neuse and Tar River drainages. A review of
NCNHP records, updated October 2015, indicates no known occurrence of dwarf
wedgemussel within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
Michaux's sumac — Michaux's sumac, endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower Piedmont, grows
in sandy or rocky, open, upland woods on acidic or circumneutral, well -drained soils or sandy loam
soils with low cation exchange capacities. The species is also found on sandy or submesic loamy
swales and depressions in the fall line Sandhills region as well as in openings along the rim of
Carolina bays; maintained railroad, roadside, powerline, and utility rights-of-way; areas where forest
canopies have been opened up by blowdowns and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots;
abandoned building sites; under sparse to moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood canopies; and in
and along edges of other artificially maintained clearings undergoing natural succession. In the central
Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant is shade intolerant and,
therefore, grows best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, periodic fire) maintains its
open habitat (USFWS 1993b).
Habitat Present: Yes
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present within the study area within the upland
portions of the existing sewer easement and along maintained roadside areas and residential
areas on Old Jenks Roads. On June 17, 2015, ESI biologist Robert Turnbull conducted
species-specific surveys for Michaux's sumac within these areas. No individuals were
Oak Pointe Property 9

observed. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2015, indicates no known
occurrence of Michaux's sumac within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
4.6 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those sites that are eligible or
potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations for cultural
resources are required whenever a Section 404 permit application is submitted to USACE.
Evaluations of site significance are made with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National
Register (33 CFR 60) and in consultation with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO).
In June 2015, ESI consulted with the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) and the
Survey and Planning Branch (S&P) of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
regarding this project study area. Research revealed that no previously recorded archaeological sites
are located within or adjacent to the proposed project study area, and no properties listed in or eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places are located within a 500 -meter radius. SHPO
provided a written response in July 2015 indicating that there are no records of any significant cultural
resource issues with the project study area (copy included as Appendix D).
5.0 SECTION 404 IMPACTS AND PERMITTING
Section 404 of the CWA requires regulation of discharges into "Waters of the United States".
Although the principal administrative agency of the CWA is the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the ACOS has major responsibility for implementation, permitting, and enforcement
of provisions of the Act. The ACOS regulatory program is defined in 33 CFR 320-330. Water bodies
such as rivers, lakes, and streams are subject to jurisdictional consideration under the Section 404
program. However, by regulation, wetlands are also considered "Waters of the United States".
5.1 Proposed Stream Impacts
377 feet of impacts to Section 404 stream channels will result from the proposed road construction at
Oak Pointe, including 115 feet of perennial stream channel and 262 feet of intermittent stream channel.
These impacts will occur at three road crossings (Sites Cl, D1, and D2), one greenway crossing (Site
C2), and one sewer easement crossing (Site F).
5.1.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Stream Impacts
The proposed stream crossings are generally perpendicular to the existing natural
channels and impacts are as narrow as possible to minimize impacts and still allow for
suitably functioning infrastructure. Typical construction methods will be used to
mimic natural stream cross section as closely as possible. Construction sequences for
stream crossings are included in Appendix H. Specific avoidance and minimization
considerations include:
® The road crossing at Site Cl uses the existing private driveway as much as
practicable to minimize impacts.
® Guidelines for the construction of greenways within Town of Apex utility
easements prohibit the use of boardwalks, so the stream impact at Site C2
Oak Pointe Property 10

could not be avoided. The greenway corridor location has been approved by
the Town of Apex and cannot be moved at this time to avoid impacts.
• To minimize impacts, the rip -rap on the upstream and downstream ends of all
road crossings will be buried below the existing streambed elevation.
• Temporary impacts at Site F will result from installation of the proposed
above -ground sewer line at this location. A temporary dam and flow
diversion will be used during construction. These structures will be installed
and removed using typical construction methods. No permanent stream
impacts will result from the installation of the sewer line.
5.2 Proposed Wetland Impacts
0.97 acres of impacts to Section 404 wetlands will result from this residential development action.
These impacts will occur at one roadside fill area (Site B), two greenway crossings (Site B and C2),
four road crossings (Sites Cl, D1, D2, and E), one drainage easement (Site E), and one sewer
easement crossing (Site F).
5.2.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Wetland Impacts
The proposed wetland impacts are minimized to the greatest extent practicable.
Specific wetland avoidance and minimization considerations include:
• Impacts at Site B are associated with fill from the road slope and a greenway
crossing. The extent of the road slope is minimized as much as possible. The
greenway crossing could not include construction of a boardwalk because
guidelines for construction of greenways within Town of Apex utility
easements prohibit the use of boardwalks. The location Town of Apex
greenway trail that crosses the property has been approved by the Town of
Apex in the Master Plan for the site. The greenway corridor location satisfies
the Town of Apex requirements for the trail and minimizes wetland and
stream impacts to greatest extent practicable.
• The road crossing for Yellow Oak Drive (Site D1) is perpendicular to the
drainageway, minimizing the amount of wetland impacts.
• The size of the lot next to Site DI was reduced as much as possible while still
making it suitable for construction of a single-family home. The two small
wetland impacts within this lot boundary are minimized as much as
practicable. The establishment of this lot is necessary to meet the purpose and
need of the applicant.
• All construction to install the culvert at Site Dl will occur in the dry
• Wetland impacts associated with Pointe Crossing over Beaver Creek are not
located at the smallest portion of this wetland. However, this crossing is
located at the narrowest portion of the Beaver Creek floodplain
(approximately 300 ft.). If this crossing were to be relocated further
upstream, the floodplain is approximately 500 ft. across and flooding would
occur on adjacent properties during high-flow storm events. Wetland impacts
at this location are minimized as much as possible without risking a
hydrologic trespass scenario. The construction sequence for this road
crossing are including in Appendix H.
Oak Pointe Property 11

® Wetland impacts associated with the construction of Orange Oak Lane and
Blue Pointe Path (Site E) are minimized as much as practicable while still
allowing access to all lots in Phase 2 of Oak Pointe. At the request of the
Town of Apex, a drainage outfall was placed between two lots on the west
side of Orange Oak Lane to line up with the topographic drainage located on
the back of those lots. Therefore, the wetland impacts within those two lots
could not be avoided. The establishment of these lots is necessary to meet the
purpose and need of the applicant.
® Wetland impacts associated with the new sewer easement at Site F are
conversion impacts only. This forested area will be permanently converted to
a utility easement in order to connect the neighborhood to the Town of Apex
sewer system. The maintenance corridor will the minimum necessary width
(20 feet).
5.3 Proposed Riparian Buffer Impacts
1.2 acres (52,322 square feet) of impacts to Jordan Lake and Town of Apex Riparian Buffers will
result from this residential development action. A Request for a No Practicable Alternatives
Determination was submitted to the Town of Apex. The Town of Apex authorized impacts to Town
of Apex Riparian Buffers in a letter dated March 22, 2016. This letter is included in Appendix B.
5.2.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Riparian Buffer lmpacis
The proposed riparian buffer impacts are minimized to the greatest extent practicable.
Specific riparian buffer avoidance and minimization considerations include:
® Impacts at Site A will result from the fill slope of Pointe Grove Lane. The
slope of this road fill cannot be minimized further due to topographic
constraints.
0 Impacts at Site Clwill be minimized by constructing the Red Pointe Drive
crossing at the same location as the existing private driveway.
® The greenway crossing at Site C2 is perpendicular to the stream channel and
is adjacent to the existing Town of Apex utility easement.
• The road crossing for Yellow Oak Drive (Site DI) is perpendicular to the
drainageway, minimizing the amount of riparian buffer impacts.
® The road crossing for Pointe Crossing (Site D2) is perpendicular to Beaver
Creek, minimizing the amount of riparian buffer impacts. This site was
chosen for the crossing of Beaver Creek because it is the narrowest portion of
the Beaver Creek floodplain (approximately 300 ft.). If this crossing were to
be relocated further upstream, the floodplain is approximately 500 ft. across
and flooding would occur on adjacent properties during high-flow storm
events.
® One of the small Zone 3 buffer impacts on Exhibit E is the result of the need
to connect Phase 2 of the development to the existing Town of Apex water
easement. The other small impact results from the lower end of a drainage
easement. The location of that drainage easement was requested by the Town
of Apex.
Oak Pointe Property 12

Riparian buffer impacts on Exhibit F are the result of the construction of a
new sewer easement that will connect the Oak Pointe property to the existing
Town of Apex sewer system. The width of the maintenance corridor has been
minimized as much as practicable (20 ft.).
Table 1. Proposed Jurisdictional Impacts
*Site labels correspond with Exhibit labels on Figures
Site*
Reason for
Rim
Permanent/
Wetland
Stream
Proposed
pact
Tem orary
Impacts
Im acts
Mitigation Ratio
Impact
Fill (Roadside fill/
0.03 ac
Area B
Greenway
Permanent
(1,167 sq.
0 ft.
2:1
crossin)
ft.)
Impact
Culvert
Permanent
_
0
45 ft.
1:1
Area C 1
Impact
Buried rip -rap
Permanent
0
24 ft.
None
Area C I
Impact
Culvert
Area C2
(Greenway
Permanent
0
22 ft.
1:1
crossing)
Impact
Fill
0.24 ac
Area Dl
(Road crossing)
Permanent
(10,440 sq.
0 ft.
2:1
Impact
Culvert
Area D1
(Road crossing)
Permanent
0
126 ft.
1:1
Impact
Buried rip -rap
Permanent
_
0
25 ft.
None
Area D 1
Impact
Fill (Road
0.50 ac
Area D2
crossing)
Permanent
(21,622 sq.
0 ft.
2:1
ft.)
Impact
Box Culvert
Area D2
(Road Crossing)
permanent
0
115 ft.
2:1
Impact
Fill
0.19 ac
Area
(Road crossing/
permanent
(8,250 sq.
0 ft.
2:1
E
Drainage
ft )
easement)
Conversion
Impact
(Forested to
0.02 ac (927
Area F
Successional)
Permanent
s ft
q' )
0 ft.
None
20 ft. Public Sewer
Easement
Impact
Temporary Dam
Area F
and Flow
Temporary
0
20 ft.
None
Diversion
Total Impacts:
0.97 (42,406
377 ft.
sq. ft.
Oak Pointe Property 13

Table 2. Proposed Riparian Buffer Impacts
Buffer
Reason for
Stream
MitigationZone
1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Impact Site*
impact
Name
required?
impact (ft)
impact (ft)
impact (ft)
Impact Area A
Roadside fill
UT to Beaver
N
0
789
0
Creek
Impact Area
Road
UT to Beaver
Cl
crossing
Creek
N
3,609
2,005
0
Impact Area
Greenway
UT to Beaver
N
1,286
906
0
C2
crossin
Creek
Impact Area
Road
UT to Beaver
N
8,650
5,543
0
D 1
crossing
Creek
Impact Area
Road
Beaver Creek
Y (L l)
7,239
4,821
11,258
D2
crossing
Impact Area F
Sewer
Beaver Creek
N
2,019
872
1,355
easement_
Total Buffer Impacts:___
22,803
14,936
14,583
*Site labels correspond with Exhibit labels on Figures
5.4 Compensatory Mitigation
Lennar has determined that there are no private mitigation banks in the service area capable of
providing all required mitigation for this project. Therefore, Lennar will purchase available mitigation
credits from private mitigation banks and will satisfy the remainder of the necessary mitigation
through the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). The NCDMS acceptance
letter and a Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability from Restoration Systems, LLC are included
in Appendix E. Proposed mitigation ratios are included in Table 1.
5.5 Phase I ESA
In response to a comment received during the public comment period from Mr. Daniel B. Martin,
Lennar is providing the executive summary of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that was
done on the property in April 2016. That document is included as Appendix I.
Oak Pointe Property 14

[NCDWQ] N.C. Division of Water Quality. 2010. Basinwide Information Management System
(BIMS). Stream Classification. <h2o.enr.state.ne.us/bims> accessed February 2016.
[NCNHP] N.C. Natural Heritage Program. 2015. October 2015 NHP Element Occurrences, Raleigh,
NC. Accessed October 2015.
[NCDENR] N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 1985. Geologic Map of North
Carolina.
[SEI] Spangler Environmental, Inc. 2016. Phase I Environmental Assessment for Oak Pointe.
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1970. Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture -Soil Conservation Service. 162 pp.
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2012. Watershed Boundary Dataset. Natural Resources
Conservation Service National Cartography and Geospatial Center.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993a. Dwarf Wedgemussel Recovery Plan. Hadley,
Massachusetts. 39 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993b. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta,
Georgia. 30 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker
(Picoides borealis): Second Revision. Atlanta, Georgia. 296 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Endangered, Threatened, and Candidate Species and
Federal Species of Concern, by County, in North Carolina: Wake County.
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html. Accessed January 2016.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Northern Long -Eared bat hnterim Conference and
Planning Guidance. USFWS Regions 2,3,4,5,& 6. 10 pp. plus appendices.
[USGS] U.S. Geological Survey. 1993. Cary, North Carolina. Topographic 7.5 -minute quadrangle
map. United States Geologic Survey, Washington, D.C.
Oak Pointe Property 15

Appendix A
Figures
Oak Pointe Property

QProject Study Area
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Source: 2011 National Geographic Society/ESRI, i -
cubed seamless USGS quadrangles (Cary, Green
Level, Apex, New Hill, INC); Project Boundary acquired
from Wake County GIS, 2014.
The information depicted on this figure is for informational
purposes only and was not prepared for ands not suitable for
legal or engineering purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
(91
9) 212-1760
(919 212-1707 Fax
www.en✓„onmantats.
Path: P.\GeoGm\Pmiects\2014\116\GIS\t000.mxd Date: 2/29/2016 223.09 PM
s
r
Project Location
Oak Pointe Property
Wake County, North Carolina
r
II
R
Ge�g�ap� I�c�Sloclet�,yl l�cubed
Project: ER14116.02
Date: Mar 2016
Drwn/Chkd: KT/RT
Figure: 1

2¢
. n
CrC2 a
, a ° CrB
i •, „ ��
WY
i i r
N
E � �
3, Cry
• h �
4l y CrC2
' C r
u r,. r � , , f `rte •.� �,;
r .`11-F'a Crc
CrC2CrE
u
WY
Y n
m rE
Q Project Study Area G�
NRCS Soil Boundary
Location and Extent is approximate.
0 250 500 --.- - y
Feet Soil Mapping Units
CrB Creedmoor sandy loam, 2- 6% slopes
Sources: Project Boundary provided by Wake County CrB2 Creedmoor sandy loam, 2- 6% slopes, eroded
GIS parcel data, 2014; NRCS Soil Survey of Wake C Creedmoor sandy loam, 6- 10% slopes, eroded
CrE Creedmoor sandy loam, 10- 20% slopes i
�}��` MfD2 Mayodan sandy loam, 10-15% slopes, eroded
Disclaimer- The information not
depicted on this isnot s for le for legal l M ? ' MgC2 Mayodan gravelly sandy loam, 6- 10% slopes, moderately eroded
purposes only and was not prepared for and is not suitable for legal or - >' .., F �;.-.g W Water
engineering purposes This information presented s net for regulatory s�q''4 y
review and s intended for use only by a Professional Land surveyor 7 N0 ()I)QMap N Wo Wehadkee and Bibb soils
p to regulatory revew ! Oarr�.d— Wy Worsham sandy loam
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
(919 212-1707 Fax
enfa/se
Path, P \Geo Gra\Pmjects\2014\116\GIS\Soils.mxd Date 2/29/2016 3.40:30 PM
Project: ER14116.02
Date: Mar 2016
Drwn/Chkd: KT/RT
Figure: 2

� w
\30" STANDARD G\RB I \ \
VA/ A AND GUTTER,,(TYP.) / J
i
190
2 ZON BUFFER IMPACT
ARE 789 SF
/x
I \ \ \BANK \ \ \
\ CREE
\ I \ \ I I \ -20'-JORDAN LAKE
ZONEUFFER 1 �Y
I\30NE O1RD\AN LAk
OBUFFER
(TY \
i
\ �
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER IldPACf EXEIIBIT - A
R
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
THE JOHN R , INC. S
COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
MCADAMS '00) 733-5646 • Mc9damsCo.com
NO. KHH-15000
: KHH15000.DWG
VFILENAME
1"=40'
11-10-2015
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER IldPACf EXEIIBIT - A
R
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
THE JOHN R , INC. S
COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
MCADAMS '00) 733-5646 • Mc9damsCo.com

i
30"AST NDARD CURB
AND GUTTER (TYP.)
s / .'
/ W W
/ AN IMPACT W y w W W W
/
/ REA 1,167 SF
EX* 30'VTOWN OF APJEX W W
FUBLdC UTILITY EA.SEMFNT W W
W W W Ji W W W W W W
/ 111
/W
zw,�TLAL4D W W W W W
EMN 104 YR-
ORM / / W FUDODR.LAINr W W W W W W
MA '� / / / W� WWW PROPOSED PLOOU PLAIN
AGEMENT FACILITY
(PER CL0KAR Sl16MiTTEd"
//W W 10112/x- -5�
�.."... (AB'L'E WYDTA-PRIIATEW W W W
QRiUWATER *AANAGEM-ENT' W W
�..."..."NTEMAN AND AJCCE3S W 1-1
/ ..... / EASEWN_f
Y
A S W W W W W W 20' JORDAN LA
/WKE /
/ W W W W ZONE 2 BUFFER /
�.. >� . W W W (TYP.)
30' JORDAN LAKE
\ ZONE 1 BUFFER
/ (TYP.)
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER IMPACT FXF rr - B
A
z
4
ti
V
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
WTMJOHN R . INC. S
CObIPANYINC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
MCADAMS ”' 733-5646 • Ma9dams'.com
PROJECT NO. K H H —15000
L
FILENAME: KHH15000.DWCi
n
SCALE: 1„-40'
In
DATE: 11-10-2015
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER IMPACT FXF rr - B
A
z
4
ti
V
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
WTMJOHN R . INC. S
CObIPANYINC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
MCADAMS ”' 733-5646 • Ma9dams'.com

CREEK
�ANK­---\ 30' JORDAN LAKE
ZONE 1 BUFFER i
\ I 1 \ \ \
W W W
\\\ I \ W W y \ 20' JORDAN LAKE
\ W W W ZONE 2 BUFFER
EXISTING GRAV
DRIVE
\ I I W W W \ \ \
\ / I
ZONE 1 BUFFE IMPACT
AREA = 3,609 SF
\ I / WE"TLAM W '
ZONE 2 BUFR IMPACT <wtl
W W W AREA = 72 4 I \� 01
35,0
\ � EXISTING BUFF
/ IMPACT
/ / NAGE NT FACILITY "A"
1STREA CHA4EL
1MPAC = 6 / ~
/\� 1 VARIABLE IVATE
I X IN 3- LSTORM ER MAN A EMENT
0 CP ENANCE AND CCESS
EASEMENT
ZO ER It�1PAC
— 9 SF I � \ \ ZONE 2 FFER I
1 \ \ AREA = 1,0
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
\ AREA = 502 SF
/ -4- / \
20' JORDAN LAKE
/ ZONE 2 BUFFER ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT
_
�(TYP.) \ \ \ = 1,286 SFS —�
�CR� BANK\�
ZONE 01 BUFFER E \ \
\ (TYP.) STREAM CF ANNEL �(
1 \\ I \ \ \\MPACT = 2�L /
C1 ONE 2 BUFFER/I�CT /AREA = 4 4'SF
PROPOSED FLOOD PLAIN
(PER CLOMR SUBMITTED
10/12/2015)
GRAPHIC SCALE
L
PROSECT NO. KHH-15000
FILENAME: KHH15000.DWG
SCALE: 1"=40'
�
HATE: 11-10-2015
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER E"ACT EXMBIT - C
I inch = 40 ft.
i
W THE JOHN R , INC. S
COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
1 tl1CADAMS [phone]•Mc9damsCo.7

IJ
z
/ PIJBLJC TITYEASEMjENV,
C
34 "1
/ q
C
IMPACT \\
H SF
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
X: Pro'ects KHH KHH-15000 Land Exhibits 2016-02-02— Impact Exhibits EX-2.dw , 5/10/2016 11:21:59 AM, Gu liotta, Mark
PROSECT NO. KHH-15000
JOHN
OAK POINTE �J
FILENAME: 14 -IE R , S
KHH 15000. D WG COMPANY, INC.sic.
C7 SCALE: 2905 Meridian Parkway
1 "=50' APEX, NORTH CAROLINA Durham, North Carolina 2771$
STREAM BUFFER E"ACT EX�IIBIT - D License No.: C-0293
Ln DATE: 11-10-2015 � C /fj DAMS [phone] • Mc9damsCo.com

/ f
�X. 30' TOWN�F-APEX
PUBLIC UTILIT E,A�SEIVI NT
Cb
50' TOWN OF 0EX
ZONE 3 BUFFET
/
2 ( AN
Z if q
/
11.3528
I
ZONE 2 BU FFR I UPACT
o J0�MDAN LAERI,
I
"/b
L
PROSECT NO. KHH-15000
FILENAME: KHH15000.OWOi
SCALE: 1"=40' "c40'
Ln
DATE: 11-10-2015
OAK POINTE
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
STREAM BUFFER E"ACT EXEIIBIT - F
0
U
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
W THE JOHN R , INC. S
COMPANY, INC.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
License No.: C-0293
1 tl1CADAMS '00)733-5646•Mc9damsCo.com

Appendix B
Town of Apex Riparian Buffer Letter and
Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate
Oak Pointe Property

S i
1,t7i ,717,7 .h
September 3, 2014
Lauren Roper
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 S. New Hope Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination
Wilkinson Property
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Ms, Roper,
P, O. BOX 250
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA 27502
lApe 1 -01
On August 18, 2014, 1 met with you at the subject site to evaluate six (6) drainage features (SA
through SF) depicted on the USDA Soil Survey and/or USGS Topographic maps and determine if
they were subject to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules. Based on the information
obtained during the site visit and per the requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), I concur with the drainage features as shown on the
attached map titled "Wilkinson Property Buffer Determination" and summarized in the table
below,
Shown asDetermination
Drainage Feature
Shown as
on Soil
made
Determined
on USGS
in the field
Buffer Width.
Survey
Feature SA
Not Present
Intermittent
Intermittent (28 pts)
50 Feet
Feature SB
Intermittent (24.5
(Upstream)
Intermittent
Intermittent
pts)
50 Feet
Feature SB
(Downstream)
Intermittent
Intermittent
Intermittent (28 pts)
50 Feet
Feature SC
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral (15 pts)
( 0 Feet
Feature SD
Intermittent
�
Perennial
Intermittent at Flag
50 Feet
(24 pt,)
Feature SE
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial (38 pts)
100 Feet
Feature SF
Not Present
Perennial
Intermittent (26.5
50 Feet
pts)

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination (Apex 14-011)
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/402 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with LIDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and S:OOpm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
cc: Tim Donnelly, Public Works & Utilities Director
tl�6.ens�:Bj

A& 2 1 /3 // I

FOR"krNN r`t„-
IMP
.
1 t
1"�'. 3 „ > x .;4 y CV;l § s S�y�ml k➢. ) \ig
��' v„tt
cz
US
�`�� � � � •� � '` "� �s CrfG�,-�� � ;� ,,� a `ri"te ` � 'i
J
f t r a t
:r f 4f�G2 av hi
p� ��,� GrBZ ,k '� '�,' �"�.:✓ ' r "��_ � x P1 F' a.� � �' t r�r ; ,.-+"�* �.; `a ,-�, �, .�"'°` x. ICZ
1 co
t
�4r CtflZ
55
EMCrc�
10 WAY=
f
JJJ yI Cry
= \CrE
` -- a� - lAf4 r a ✓' s 'f
tar
Sam
�r62 ^a e G C J,ydp idyl
�'k' °r -ss4L
Dpi= a
GA
ly too It'
MR
fL=Z
�. C,Uk
AJmm
AS
5w�
�'
LI----
Call
tal
—
” a4( hsj.
}W"r� .� `$ �j h1f02
r• �! .x.. ��Y � u � x • ,,;f",� � ! , tis � ,f / ht r7 �� � � a �'�
i

/X at
his; 9
NC DWO Sti-eani Identification Form Vpr.einn :1.11 <,!!
Date:13 ) f L-
7
Project/Site: , - ,
1x1111!-tns-�r�
Latitude: r�
3S.� s _ 0
Evaluator: ��1Y,
1 County: }l-
Longitude: _
.'") -i
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermitten, 1
L-
Stream Determirtgti,a_n (circle ane)
Ephemeral d _ermittent Perennial
Other
if>: 19 or erenniaiit> 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg (
e.g. quad Name:
A. Geomor holo gy (Subtotal = k" ,E 1
Absent I
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank (
0
1
(2,} ,
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg (
0 1
1
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. ri fle-pool, step -pool,
ripple pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
` 0
('}
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
( 0
1 j
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches -
G
1
( (D
3
7. Recent alluvia! deposits
(0}
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 cOther _ 0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1,5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
('
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
titllo = 0.�
Yes = 3
ai uiiut utcnes are not ra leo; see mscuss ions in manual
B. Hvdrotoqv (Subtotal = - 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 1
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
(2,} ,
3
14. Leaf litter
( 1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
( 0
ld 5.
i
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
rQ 5>l
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
( tOj
No = 0
yes = 3
U. nlolouv (Jur)total = k01`: 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
(
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream, bed
_I
_O
20. tvfacrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)____4
t
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
t0)
1 �
2
3
22, Fish
tC)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
( tOj
0.5
24. Amphibians(
0�
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0}
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 cOther _ 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using otter methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 _t �
Date: f / � 0 1 !
7
Project./Site: ;��; ,' ; �- ; l;wr{'1
latitude: I.5 i-`(
Evaluator:
County: 1i';j n e'
Longitude: . 7 f',V7 2 8�
Total Points:
iperens at
�
�✓�� �
Stream Determination circle one
Ephemeral
Other C '
if perennial
rf _ 'T 9 or perennial if _ 30"
Intermittent Perennial
e. Quad Name
9
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_!126 )
Absent
2
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
14. Leaf litter
01)
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0.5
"1('
2
3
3. in -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
(0}
0.5
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
1
(-2)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
1
1.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Otheerr =
1
2
3
9. Grade control0
0.5
Cad
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
_ 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
Sketch:
annual ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
(Q�
0.5
1 1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
(1,) 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
No = 0
(Yes = 3
U. biology (subtotal = to )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
01
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
N
1
2
3
i 22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'manual.
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Otheerr =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification F'ot-m Vousion 4.11 ,n r
Date:7 �� t l [
! --
Project/Site: ,.
W 1 � (- 41"t, 0 t1
Latitude:
Evaluator, L
""
County: �.,� t„�
Jch
Longitude:2z
78,87
Total Points: /1
r
StStream is at least intermittentif!3
I Stream Determ�i a'on (circle one)
Ephemeral
Other �l
if 19 or perennial 3Q"
n� #ermine Perennial
4 p ----
g -
e. Quadlvame:��
A. veomorphology (Subtotal = �_ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
0 1 2
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank_
( 0
i
2
Qa 0.5 1
-/�� `+
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1.5
2
No = 0
3✓_.
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 -t
1
(�
0.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
( i
1
2
1.5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
jJ
2
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
A)
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
3
9. Grade control
� ('Q,1
1 0.5
1
Sketch:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
(p}
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
anuiaac uituies are nut rated; See discussior5 In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = F3. 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1. J 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Qa 0.5 1
1,5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5t 1J
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =, 3l}
C. Biology (Subtotal = k n )
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Maerobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0)
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0)
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =0.75; OBL = 1.5Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

itiC D�VQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date; 7L301 -?'0 fly
ProjectIsite: W1fv-,1lrcl, prye�
Latitude: J5 �5-
Evaluator;S �(� . ( 1x ( o
County: �(�)t
Longitude:
t
Total Points -
Stream is at least intermittent i
if i(a
(circle �S� etermination (circle one)
Ephemera Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
a 19 or oerennial .A"
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
J !
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= C' }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
14. Leaf litter
Strong
I' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
J !
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
60D
1
2
0.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
(
1
2
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0.5
1
2
26. Wetland plants in streambed
3
7 -Recent alluvial deposits
Other -
1
2
p. 35 of manual.
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
am mai dncnes are nut rated; sea discussons in manual
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal = 5- }
12. Presence of Baseflow
( 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris0
0 5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1 5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
J !
No = 0 Yes - 3
U. Biolo Subtotal = ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed (
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
`0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other -
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

sD
NC DNVQ Stream Identification Porro Wrcinn d 11
Date: "7/3U/ZU J `-%
ProjecuSite
Evatuafor: CSX 1C. 11 rvrt.L11
I County: �„fAk'C
Longitude: 7C� 7 it e
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent1 S
Seam etermination (circle one)
Ephemera
Other
�� C
.
ffz ift 19 or erenniat 30`
Intermittent Perennial
e g. Quad Name; r i sV
A /'- ., t, ..1.4 rcv. _r 0
a
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
n
iAosent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure; ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
1
1
-2-3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 -Recent alluvial deposits
(}
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
0.5
0.5
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Other 0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0,5
1
1,5
11. Second or greater order channel
artificiaI ditches are not rated see discuss'c I
N =
Yes = 3
ns man,,a
B. HvdroloQv (Subtotal = 1- 1
12. Presence of Baseftow
60-) 1
2
3
13, iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
2
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
2
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1
Ye = 3
1.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish0.5
_9_4::::0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
(
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
26. and plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DNVQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
G G'
Date:
ProjactfSife:
Latitude: e��a
Evaluator: (� _ y -
County: Jrl
Longitude: -76 B-1 ;
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermNent
Stream Determination (circle e}
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other /
if>_ Igor perennial if >_ 30"
erennia
e.g. Quad Name: ( l
A, Geomorphology (Subtotal = Z j�} Absent
Weak ,
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank , 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
(3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, 0
ri le- oot sequence
1
2
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0
1
_ 2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0
1
(2i
3
6. Depositional bars or benches j 0
1
0
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0--i
(
2
3
8. Headcuts O
1
2
( 3
9. Grade control (Q?
0.5
1
1,5
10. Natural valley b
0.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= --
12. Presence of Basefiow
0OQ,�
2 ("/13.
Iron oxidizing bacteria
0214.
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Leaf litter
1.50.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Q�1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
01
1,5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
�e 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = t )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
(}
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(0)
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
LD
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DNVO Stream Identification Forth Version 4.11
wN9
Date:
I Project/Site: 1, -
Latitude: r
Evaluator: L �
County: tt��z t,
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least iniermillent �t4
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if 2: 30`
Ephemeral l �mittep tel rPerennial
e.g. quad Warne:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =--A \ } (
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank -
0 •1
2)'
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg �-
0 1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. ri le -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2 I
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
i 0 1
(2)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
f` 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
76;_ 1
2
3
8. Neadcuts
0 1
(2,7
3
9. Grade control_
f'0) 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 0.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
ararrciai oitcnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Nvdrologv (Subtotal = q 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 ( 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0a% 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
( 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es = 3
C. bioloov (Subtotal= In .S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
�2)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(0)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
q)
1
2
3
22. Fish
'n
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

,3+; s ,w wu - �� r :; '�. r tater- ?�+,
�. > , : _ r�., f��,.�1�«'�at"1c -.. �. ,,, is�S�',.. ' , -_. ,';+7;��}�,,, ,'�'e T,,.-: ,fi7s, ...
07/28/2@14 21 ; 35 9155425357 SUSA'I CAGTt.-"6!J.?',' PAGE 0", /©:
owner(s) of the (Ovencr Name) property,
commonly identified as `112G'_4rLLt �! 17 NIR— OEE U.5. 4i\\" . 60 A -
(street)
�\v A i<�L State
(City/Towtt) (CoLMty)
hereby grant, freely and without coercion, the right of access and entry to said property to .Environmerta,I
Services, lac., including but not limited to its employeos, contractors, subcontractors aid any applicable
regulatory agency perszannel, fvr the purpose of environmental, ecological or archaeological assessments.
This access agreement is effective upon signature and shall remain in effect until such time as assessment
activities are completed, including any ancillary activ4jes associated with said activities.
Environmental Services, Inc. is also granted the right to act as my authorized agent for the purposes of
conducting this site review and future consu(tativn with regulatory agencies
For the consideration and purposes net forth herein, VWe hereby acknowledge, accent and agree to the
terms of the Right of Entry Agreement as evidenced by soy dated signature below.
Signed this 29 day ofJ 2014.
Print Name;
u�'-

kiGly & AGr!'ITAUTI IORIZATION
irlVct CTu-11Gt t_ t 0 � 0 �� the ownerls) or the (Owner Name) property
_
coin murily identified as
State of, C.
(cityrIbwn)
(C aunty)
hereby grant. 6ee1y and without eOcrcirrrt tite ri'llt ot'tIccess incl entry to said property to f nvtronmental
Services, lne., incltu111114 but Clot lin iter! to its CjjIployees, Contractors, Sul;(otltraCtiirS and any applicable
rcgulatory inmicy persr7nne1, for the puryose ot'environmental, ccological or archaeological assessments.
This access trgrcettient i,5 ef`f'ective upon signature and shall renutin in et'fect u:uil such time as assessment
activities are Completed, inclu&-ig tmy ancillary activities associatcd with said activitics.
Fnvirontnrn4rl SCrvicet,, inc. is also granted the right to act as im authorized agent fi-r the purprses uf`
conducting this site review and (inure eonsttltation with regulatory agencies
For the consideration and purpclses set E>rth herCilt, IjW'e hereby ac novvJedpe, accept and agnea to the
terms oft lie night oFFlitry :lgrecmrnt as evidenced Uy my elated signature below_
Sibncd [lti>;�f day or '014.
PrintName: C,.AAJi i-ason %
d
Signature; �y/� '! '�.'�_ _ � �__�✓�>��ijY�r��t✓�.
t<1

RIGHT' OFEWINY &
WIL-<JAj5tyk) the mvixqs) of the (Owner Nimc) propQ)-tN
commonly identified ns
(Street)
AV-
C State or
(County)
hereby grant, fi-ee,v and \,vitljowt rxcrcion, the rigflll ofaccess and CrItry to said property to [.,nvjrOnjjjej,t,,j
Se"V'Ce-IS, but nDt Jirj-,.j'tCd to its CQntrOCtOl—,, 'JUI)COntra tur
C S and any applicable
regulatory ag'--IICY personnel, for the purpose ()renvh*onrncnt2j, ecological of archaeological asscssmcnts.
This access agreement is cltC,ive t. ,11 S
and shall icr, in in effQ, Lrcij SLC11 time as assessment
activities are CompleLcdincludingaly
1116112"Y activities associated with said activities,
Emb-ollmenta i Services, Inc. is also grunted the vii,fit to ac, "- my autljor �7 _Cd gent
for the purposes of
conducting this site rcvie,.v and future with I-egtjjj4,j-y agencies I
For the coc.sideration und pt"Poses sct t'rth hereim L/We hereby acknow1ccige, accept and agree to the
0
terms of the Right of'Entry Agreement as evidenced by
Z� I my dated signature below.
S;I-fled this Zq- (RIY 20114.
[Ynt Name: C",\yzLej W. `l iuelNSUN
Signature:
-A�

RIMIT OF E;N"1, RV & AGE;V'I AIII10RIG,1'I ON
j14160ri oevnaN of the (O"ncr Ami) proputy
coanmonly idcntitied as
(street)
' n
(C'ity/Cuwr;) (C«uttt,)
hereby grant. fi'eet�,,- and without coercion. the richt ofaccess and entry to said property to rnvoo n emill
Services, Inc., including but nol, limited to its empkIces, contractors, sAcommors and any applicable
regulatory a,cnc} personnel, to'- the purpose or envionrnental, ecological or ,7rchacological assessments,
phis access agruenwm is affective a:pon sit�a;ature anal shall renraiaa in el-fect mail such time as assessment
activities are completed, inc-iudkg an; ancillary MAPS associetcd with said activities.
F,nvironmentrti , ecton , lne, is atsa, granwd the right to act as My authorized age;tt k>r tl:e purposes of
conduc611�2, this site review and Sure cxxuaaltation with regulatory agencies
For the consideration and purpnscs se, ti)rth herein, U% hereby acknowledge, accept and agree to the
tams of the Right of FMI, ;agreement as evidenced by my dated signature below.
Signed this, AqdatiC f,J 'pl-t
Print Name: IY"GS {� A
Signature: I/'> t✓�/11 2 C '-v/ / f• ! i]e{;°

RIGIFFOYENTRY & ik(;FNT'1UTIMRI/.A I ION
the Name) prc-peivy
foam)
State
((•tyrray)
frorch" .�rxlC firceiv arld %vitllcut ccmchm t rWN Mcmby and cno, b) mad p"Verq u3 EnvpOmnem,
including but no' lill`iwd co hs cmpbyec& contrcictoj,i, subcontra,:t("rs and all., applicabk:
reg[ti lory ugmy perunwL AV he purpose oVenUmmemaL cM,CTica: a,,;c�srucms
"Is ncccs' ag''CLi -nt IS clft-ive upon Agmawn and SNOB rcnlai'l m CC,
111,61
sw:i, tinic as a-S-Ses"mien(
nchvles are comphe? jm&dWg ar1?: ajjtii!iary acliviiie.s
P P
ur ()
Oata[1i111f�, tiff( ii!c lcviif'w and agencies
i -or tl e COiltib 2rttJtl TU d PLWPOSCS Set �Cycjjj, J!,Vc ,ickno%%!cdgk2t a(:cpt and k-, the
[cr:n", u!"'l]c Riglil of is evj(+cjlCCd by 111> dak-,d, Sjignluure '%low.
--1 y C)
Prim Navne:

RIG111 OF ENTRY & AGENT AUTHOXIZATIOtN
rnue .J y r L 1
� F`1d se -Q,
, tc t py the owners of the O.vner Name
__'_- rt ) { ) propei-ty
commonly identified as-2j(Q
sweet}
State of
(Cityff'owr,) Count
{ Yi
hereby grant. freely and without coercion, the ri2lrt of access ,and entry to said property to Euvronmenta{
Services, I' -.c., including but not limited to its employees, contractors, subcontractors and any applicable
regulatory agency personnel, for the purpose of er,vironn1cntai, ecological or archaeological assessrrents.
This access agreement is effective ttport signature and shall ,emart in effect ur,tli Such time as assessment
activities are completed, including any ancillary activities associated with said activities.
6nvironm<l.taI Services, Iitc. is also granted the right to act as myauthorized a era for the pttrposcs of
conducting this site review and future consultation with regulatory agencies
For the consideration and pureoses set fnrth herein, Me hereby ac!<nowiedgc, accept and agree to the
teens ofthe Right ofEntry Agreement as evidenced by my darted si,natlire below.
Signed this clay of 201 4,
Print Name: Ll ke �j jC2 C.tt�f
Signature: ,�

Mr. Robert Turnbull
Environmental Sedvces,Inc,
49O1Trademark Drive
Raleigh, NC27610
PruBOX zm
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA 2 7502
Subject: Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate (15-OI3)
Oak Pointe
Beaver Creek and UT to Beaver Creek [Jordan Lake Watershed, NSW, WS -IV]
Dear Mr. Turnbull,
On March 7, 2016, the Town of Apex (Town) received a Request for a "No Practical
Alternatives" determination for the subject project. In accordance with Section 6.1,11(G)(4) of
the Town's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), you have authorization to impact
approximately 22,803 square feet (ft z ) of Zone l, 14,936 ft z of zone J and 14,585 ft a of zone 3
riparian buffer as shown in the table below. This authorization is for the purposes of
constructing new sanitary sewer line, greenvvaytrai[ and road crossing as described within
your application.
Buffer Impacts Approved:
Impact
Impact
Amount
Plan Location
Mitigation
Required
Location
Category
Approved
or Reference
Ratio
Mitigation
Zone I
Allowable
22,803
Application
N/A
0
Zone 2
Allowable
14,936
Application
N/A
0
Zone 3
Allowable
14,583
Application
N/A
0
This authorization certificate isfor the purpose and design that isdescribed )nyour application
and shown on approved construction plans. If you modify your project, you must notify the
Town and you may berequired tosubmit a new application. If the property issold, the new
owner must be given a copy of this authorization letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. As always, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any

Town of Apex
Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate (15-013)
Page 2 of 3
other federal, state or local permits before you begin your project. This authorization requires
you to follow the conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface water standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of
the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual,
Town standards, and the Town Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control ordinance.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual, Town standards, and Town Erosion Control ordinance. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil)
projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of
the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation
in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the application. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and
erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed such that no violations of
state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-
erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers and will not re -concentrate
before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0267(8) and Town
UDQ Section 6.1.11.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization (associated with the approved
buffer impacts to Zone 2) shall be referred in writing to the DWQ Director within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this notice for a decision.

Town of Apex
Riparian Buffer Authorization Certificate (15-013)
Page 3 of 3
To contest the Director's decision, you must file a petition for an administrative hearing. You
may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative Hearings. You must file the
petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday
through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except for official state holidays. The
original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DENR as follows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This Authorization shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
This letter does not authorize any impacts to either Waters of the United States or Waters of
the State. Please contact the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) if any impacts are proposed to either of these waters.
If you have any questions or would like a copy of UDO Section 6.1.11 (Town buffer rules), please
do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager

F) E
z
C
Office. Use On"Y
Project NO -
Dat -2 recelved:
REQUEST FOR A "NO PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVES" DETERMINATION
A. Applicant Information
1. Project Information
Name of Project: Oak Pointe
Project Address/Location:
Old Jenks Rd, Apex
2. Owner Informat ion
Narne(s) on Recorded Deed:
attached list
Deed Book and Page No.:
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Street address:
Ci ty, Sta t e, Z! p:
Telephone Number:
E-mail address:
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
Name:
Scott Johnson
Business name (if applicable):
K. Hovnanian Homes of North Carolina, Inc.
Street address:
3333 Regency Parkway, Suite 100
City, State, Zip.,
Cary, NC 27518
Telephone Number:
919-238-5139
E-mail address:
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
Name:
Robert Turnbull
Business name (if applicable):
Environmental Services, Inc.
Street address:
4901 Trademark Drive
City, State, Zip:
Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number:
919-212-1760
E-mail address:
rturnbull@esinccc
Page 1 of 3 Lnst updated: 4/1512011

B, Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
Property identification no, (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See Attached List
Property size (acres):
58.04
2. Watershed Data
Watershed Protection Overlay District: M Prim, ziri ElSecordary
River basin:
Capt, Fear
If Cope Fear, is pro 'fect w1th.n Jordan Lake t-votershed?
121yes, 1:11`10
Narne of nearest body of water to project:
Beaver Creek
3. Project Description (Attach additional sheets as necessary
Describe the existing conditions and land �se in -the vicinity of the project at time of application:
One private residence is currently present on the property, but property is otherwise undeveloped. Surrounding
land use is primarily new residential single-family housing. An existing sewer easement is present within the
property,
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct road crossings to allow for continued site development as a residential
neighborhood. The project will also Involve construction of a greenway that wlil connect to the Town of Apex greenway
systern.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The road crossings will be constructed to connect to undeveloped residential parcels in Phase
I and 2 of the Oak Pointe development,
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
Have Jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the USACE,
DWO, or Town been obtained for this property in the past? 21 Yes No
If yes, who delineated the Jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): �OV,NAV'Yle.rAl 5-CV1'tC 5 ) T, C—
[:]Agency Mconsuitant,
1:1 Other:
If yes, list the dates of the determinations and attach documentation.
Apex buffer determination (#14-011 September 3, 2014); USACE JD (SAW -2016-00095)
5. Project History
Have permits or certifications been obtained for this project in the
past?
[:]Ye,, ONO
if yes, explain:
Page 2 of 3 List updated! 4/15/2011

C, Buffer Impacts
1. Impacts Summary (Attach additional sheets as necessary.
List all buffer impacts belmv.
if any it ipa--ts require rnitiCation, then you MUST fi'l Out Section D of V1115 form,
Which buffers are impacted? Check all that apply. FV]Tovitl r" ApCX
Buffer Reason for Impact Stream Name Mitigation Zone I Zone 2 Zone 3
impact 0 required? impact (ft2) impact (ft) Impact (ft)
B1
IDYC,3 [:]ria
E2
Oyes Ono
E3
Yes, [It,,.
84
[]Yas EINIO
Total Buffer Impacts:
Comments:
See attached table
2. Mapping
Attach a map In sufflicient del-al to accurately:
Ev(]62,11c2lt dhe Ecuridari= cf the 1-and t3 bC Oi=d lin a,—, jing out LM actvty.
1 7V s;-ccw the exle,,,t of r1pariz-, buffers,
[v:7]stiv, 1=tIen am dimm_,n_,:cr6 of buffer d:a,,_,rt-zr,,ce,
3. Explanation (Attach additional sheets as necessary.
Describe why this activity cannot be practically accomplished, reduced, or reconfigured to better minimize
disturbance to the riparian buffer;
See attachment.
Describe best management practices proposed to control the Impacts:
Applicable ESC measures tivlll be employed during construction and approved BNIPs will be
utilized post-construction to control runoff and stormwater.
4. Certification
By my signature below, I (as the applicant) attest that the project meets all criteria set forth In Town of Apex
UDO Section 6.1,11(G)(4)(a)(i) - (iii) for finding "No Practical Alternatives".
Name: Title.
Signature: Date;
Page 3 of 3 Last updated: 411512011

3. Expl enation
The purpose of the OaL Pointe protect is to construct [lie infra)tructurc necessary to access wide doper
residential 1 ;ts ori the Oak Poi,it- property, Spccificarlly, the purpose of the proposed roads on tiie
property is to allmi traffic into tite devclopnient from Oi.:l Jen Road and Timm hloliolv Drive and to
allow traCiic: to flow smoothly throuli the `fhe proposeal 4zreenviay on the property will
connect to the `i'oivn of Apex greenway system and allmv for foot traffic to access existing +greenway
trails. A sewer casement is proposed near the southern end of tliJ" property to allow sin+„ le -family homes
in Oak Pointe to connect to lite Town of Apex sewer system,
The proposed riparian buffer impacts on tlx:: Oak Pointe property are minimized to the greatest extent
practicable Nvhils: still aehi:ving the purpose of the projeC. Specific riparian buffer avoidance and
minimization considerations inciud: the foliowing:
• Impacts at Site A will result from the fill slope of Pointe, Grove Dane. Tlitti slope of this road fill
cannot be minimized further date to topograiphic constraints.
• Impacts at Site C l will be minimized by constructing the red Pointe Drive crossing at tale same
location as tae existing private €lrive��ay.
• The greenwav crossing= at Site C2 is perpendicular to flit stream channel and is adjacent
to the existing Town of Apex utility easement.
• The road crossing for Yellow Oak Drive (Site DI) is perpendicular to tile drainageway,
minimizing tate amount of riparian buffer impacts.
• The road crossing for Pointe, Crossing (Site D2) is perpendicular to Beaver Creek, minimizing the
amount of riparian buffer impacts. This site Naas chosen For the crossing of Beaver Creel: because
it is the narrowest portion of fhe Beaver Creek floodplain (approximately 300 ff.). If this crossing
were to be relocated further upstream, the floodplain is approximately 500 ft. across and flooding
would occur on adjacent properties during high -floe, storm events.
• One of the small Zone 3 buffer impacts on Exhibit E is the result of the need to connect Ph -15L 2
of the development to the existing To;gin of Apex water casement. The other small' impact results
from the lower end ora drainage easement. The location of that drainage casement was requested
by the Town of Apex.
• riparian buffer inipsrcts on Exhibit F are the result of the construction ora new sewer easement
that will connect the Oak Pointe property to the existing Town of Apex sewer system. The width
of the maintenance corridor has been minimized as much as practicable (20 ft).

BufferI
Reason for
Streamd6
4Iiti-atloaa
� zoa1e I
Zone 2
� Zone 3
Impact
*
Site_
Wla� Area
Impact
° Roadside
Namei
_
U I Beaver
! required?
impact (ft)
(Y/
� lfalll£1Ct (lt'')
_
� 13aalaai t
pact
A
fill
{ to
( Creek
789
Impact Area
Road
UT to 13eaver
�
!
iw 3,6{39
"a
0
CI
Y
crossing
Creek:
� ,005
k
Iru Area
P tact
( Greem.vra
UT to Beaver
: l,='8G
9�6
C2 i
crossifli�
reel
Creek-
Impact
Impact Area
Road
_
UI to Beaver
.�..
� � N N i
8,650
.�.
S,S�l3
0
DI
crossing
Creek
j
�
Impact Area
Road
'
Beaver Creed. �
1 7,239 �
�I,821
11,258
_ D? E
crossint
Impact Area
Sewer
BeaverCreel9
,a �
�
87.
.,
i,��_ a
F
easement
Total Buffer Impacts: 2, L34,96
14,936
w 14,583
*Site labels correspond with Exhibit labels on Figures

1.
Wake County PIN: O7337U6935
Deed Book/Page: 0/0
Heirs ofMary Lou Breedlove
c/o Jerry Lindsay, Executor
2S93Pea Rid�eRoad
New Hill, NCZ75G2'8938
J. Wake County PIN: 87337D9BO8
Deed 800k/Page:OOGDOZ/OO2D7
Virginia C. Wilkinson
1OOTmehartWay
Morrisville, N[27S6O-786O
I Wake County PIN: O7337O641Z
Deed 800k/Pa8e:DU68O2/OOZD5
Charles W.Wilkinson
1O4Boxford Road
Morrisville, NCZ756O-961G
4, Wake County PIN; Q7337O9]O7
Deed 800k/PaQe:OO573O/8O81Z
Billy KWilkinson
672IOld Jenks Road
Apex, NC]7S23'B255
5. Wake County PIN: O73I79871Z
Deed Book/Page: 0/0
G1O1Collins LLC
lDallas Herndon Heirs
c/o Virginia Wilkinson
IOOTiuehartWay
Morrisville, NC 27560-7060
G. Wake County PIN: O732O938O3
Deed 800k/PaQe:D/O
6101Collins LLC
1Dallas Herndon Heirs
c/o Virginia Wilkinson
108Tmehart Way
Morrisville, NC275GO-7D6O

YJ koCouniyP|N:O7S278O583
Deed Bonk/PaQe:O15865/O18Z5
Revocable Trust Agreement' for James C.[ostlebury
Susan [ast|ebury,Trustee
23Crosswinds Estates Drive
P{ttsbouo,N[Z731Z'84SO

Appendix C
USFWS Concurrence Letter
Oak Pointe Property

A 11 (_1 I is t 7, 201 5
Robert FUMbUll
Environmental Services, Inc.
4901 Trademark Drive
Ralei uh, NC 27610
Re: Oak Pointe Property- Wake COUrity, NC
Dear Mr, Turnbull:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U,S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at Therefore, ifyOU have projects that
occur within the Ralei-oli Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Ralei-li Field Office for a list of federally -protected species,
C 1:1
Out- x%,cb page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species prowcied by the provisions of the Endangered SPcCiCS Act of 1973.L
aS amended ( 16
U.S.C. 153 ) I et seq. )(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to Occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action 1ederatly authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize tire continued existence of any
federal I y -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may lie
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our,,veb page at Please clieck the
web site often for updated information or changes.
L_
The term' ederal species Of concern" refers to thuse species which the Service believes mi,-flt be in need d'
cmicentrated comscr% :itioli utitms FeLrd sp,_,cit2s Cat concci n rcCcive th) IL -_,al proALMiMI and their desi-witioll
not necessarily imply that the species will Ca ClItLIZIlly be po-upmcd for listing as a federally endaii-cred or threaAcned
species, ftuwvever, %�C I-CLU111111elld that all poacticable wexitires be taken It) avid or minimize advcrse impicts to
federal species of concern.
-ment of the Intefior
United States Depart
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE:
hA
­k Ofllicu
R,-flt�iqh, Nm-th a,vhn3 27636-3726
A 11 (_1 I is t 7, 201 5
Robert FUMbUll
Environmental Services, Inc.
4901 Trademark Drive
Ralei uh, NC 27610
Re: Oak Pointe Property- Wake COUrity, NC
Dear Mr, Turnbull:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U,S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at Therefore, ifyOU have projects that
occur within the Ralei-oli Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Ralei-li Field Office for a list of federally -protected species,
C 1:1
Out- x%,cb page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species prowcied by the provisions of the Endangered SPcCiCS Act of 1973.L
aS amended ( 16
U.S.C. 153 ) I et seq. )(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to Occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action 1ederatly authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize tire continued existence of any
federal I y -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may lie
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our,,veb page at Please clieck the
web site often for updated information or changes.
L_
The term' ederal species Of concern" refers to thuse species which the Service believes mi,-flt be in need d'
cmicentrated comscr% :itioli utitms FeLrd sp,_,cit2s Cat concci n rcCcive th) IL -_,al proALMiMI and their desi-witioll
not necessarily imply that the species will Ca ClItLIZIlly be po-upmcd for listing as a federally endaii-cred or threaAcned
species, ftuwvever, %�C I-CLU111111elld that all poacticable wexitires be taken It) avid or minimize advcrse impicts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recorniriend that surveys be Conducted to determine
the species" presence or absence N% ithin the project area. 'I he USC of'North Carolina Natural
g
Heritage prorain data should not be Substituted f6raCtUal field surveys.
Z� t, -
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, VOU Should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, SUrvey methodologies, and in analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that ini lit affect the Species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact Our office for concurrence (unless an
F.'rivironniental Impact Statement is prepared). I Iowev er, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading; to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing Linder the Act at
these sites. N'e believe that the requirements of'section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations Linder section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Flowever, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse imp-acts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan Should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls Should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition. we recommend maintaining
zz�
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our Nvebsite at to address and mitigate
Z� —
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the de�clopnient 01'VOUr projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).

We hope you find our web PaOC Useful and inforniati\ e and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
L,
species' lists. If VOLI have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis ofthis office at
[phone] ext. 26,
Sincerely,
Field Supervisor
10

List ofCountics in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
L" I
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertic
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
CLIrrituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edoecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
I loke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Monto , ornery
Moore
Nash
New I lanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4
Perquinians
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Turrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
wasllint� , ' toil
Wayne
Wilson

Appendix D
SHPO Concurrence better
Oak Pointe Property

STATE c>.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Barton, Administrator
Go, cmor Pat \IcCron
Secrctar� Su;an Klutra
July 16, 2015
Terri Russ
Environmental Services, Inc.
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh NC 27610
Re: Develop Oak Pointe, Old Jenks Road, Apex, Wake County, ER 15-1523
Dear 'Is. Russ:
Thank you for your letter of June 30, 2015, concerning the above project.
Officc of Archives and I listory
Deputy secretary Kc -in Chern
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on 1~tistoric Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental. review (t neder.goov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
4,n Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones S¢eet, R1leigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Sen -ice Center, Rdeigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Pax: ()19) 807-6570/807-6599

Appendix E
Compensatory Mitigation Letters
Oak Pointe Property

Environmental
Quality
Scott Johnson
K.HovanianHomes ofNC, Inc.
3333Regency Parkway, Suite 100
Cary, NC 27518
March, 2, 2016
PATk4[[RORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project smindicated inthe table
below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the OK4S in -lieu fee mitigation program will be
approved bythe permit issuing agencies nomitigation for project impacts. kinthe responsibility ofthe applicant h»
contact permitting agencies iodetermine if payment hothe DIMS will beapproved. You must also comply with all other
state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including
G 8 § 143-214�11.
This acceptance isvalid for six months from the date ofthis letter and isnot transferable. Ifwehave not received a
copy ufthe issued 4O4Peomkd4Q1CertHoation/CAMApermit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It
iathe applicant's responsibility hosend copies ufthe permits toDMS. Once DMS receives acopy ofthe pennit(o)an
invoice wi||beissued based onthe required mitigation )nthat permit and payment must bemade prior toconducting the
authorized work. The amount ofthe in -lieu fee tobe paid byanapplicant iocalculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep
Based onthe inlonnabonsupplied byyou inyour request bzuse the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory
mitigation are summarized inthe following table, The amount ofmitigation required and assigned toDMS for this impact
is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Uponrecaptofpoyment,OMSwW|takenaoponoibUhyforpruvidingUheonmpenaaborymitiQabon. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest inthe DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. |fyou have any questions nrneed
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at(A1Q)7O7-8915.
cc: James Laotinger, USACE-Raleigh
Robert Turnbull, agent
Sincerely,
Jam s B Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
wur'n, rn-?rr�o"�"�
m�� kcpom�zz/��'�'
River CU Location
Stream (feet)
I Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
Buffer 11
aoid
Cool --I —warm
Ri arian
Riparian 1_60�s_tal Marsh
1 Jordar.-Low--e—r New Hope
Uponrecaptofpoyment,OMSwW|takenaoponoibUhyforpruvidingUheonmpenaaborymitiQabon. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest inthe DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. |fyou have any questions nrneed
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at(A1Q)7O7-8915.
cc: James Laotinger, USACE-Raleigh
Robert Turnbull, agent
Sincerely,
Jam s B Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
wur'n, rn-?rr�o"�"�
m�� kcpom�zz/��'�'

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
May 5, 2016
Mr. lames Lastinger
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Availability of Compensatory Stream & Wetland Mitigation Credits
Project: Oak Pointe
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that 171 Stream Mitigation Credits
(Credits) from the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and may be used,
once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Oak Pointe project, and as proposed by K. Hovnanian
Homes of North Carolina, Inc. (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
r
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix F
NCWAM and NCSAM Evaluation
Oak Pointe Property

NC WANT WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manuel Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Welland Site Name VJXA Date 2!22,'201
-larcf�-� ._cod Forest ation J Harbour,ESI
Wetland Type Bottorriand I Assessor Name/Organiz,
Level III Ecoregion, Fieulirriont Nearest Named Water Body fli-aver —Cr", -;,
—
River Basra e Cape Fear Y USGS B -Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
( �sYris (- No Precipitation within 48 firs? Latitudoll-onq1tudo (loci -degrees) 35.7550 7if 8725
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Fl;ase circle andior make note, or" last page if ovderace of stressors is apparent Consider d-epWILIM ffOrn te"OtCnC0 if
approPrate, in recant past (for instance approxima!ety vi,th. n 10 years) Note,-ior1hy stressors inclkide but ares gut 1:mited
to the following
Hydroloogical rrod'fi cations (exarnples cl;tchLs dans beaver d.,v­ris dikes berms ponds etc
Surface and sub, surface cl;scnarges into the il'exarnp'as discharges cortalring cibvk,mis prosenck" of nearby
septic tanks- underground storage tanks (uses) hog lagoons of,,,)
Signs of vego-3tion, stress (exarriplas vegelatior, mcnilly, insect damage disease storm dainmge, sa!t lntruvion etc I
• fiabitatptant community afterat:cn (examples mo,,,ilng clear cut' rig exotics etc
Is the assessment area Intensively managed? ,­ Yes iw 1,11-o
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
Aradronious fish
Federally protected species or State err angered or thmalered species
NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
11 Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
Pubfidy owned properly
N,C Division of Coastal Management Area of Envirarmerital Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
F Abuts a stream with a NCD11JQ classification: of SA or supplemental classifications of HOV41, ORW, or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference cornmunity
Abuts a 303(d),Iisted stream or a tributary to a 303(d) listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the watiand, it any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
C Browriviater
r Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar C Wind C, Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? 4- Yes l;' No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver?
Does the assessment area experience ovorbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions?
( , Yes f; No
f- Yes X-. N a
1. Ground Surface Conclition/Vogetation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Check a box In each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual) If areference is net applicable
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect
GS VS
re A
(;' A Not severely altered
B ir- B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples. vehicle tracks. excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples mechani�al disturbance herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing
less diversity (if approphatel, hydrolo9t. alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Chock a box In each column, Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub) Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching gwdance far
North Carolina hydric soils (see USAGE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils A ditch
s 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and ditch
subsurface water. Consider tidal flooding reglmw, if appflcatle
Surf Sub
i
A A Water storage capacity and dura"on are not altered
B 8 Walter storage capacity or duration are altered, but hot substantially (typicalfy, not sufficient to changevLgetaljon,
C r. C Water storage capacity or duraftri we substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples draimng, flooll,nq sol compacticin, fl!ing excessive sedimentation underground utility rnes
3, Water StoragaiSurface Relief - assessment aroalwetland type condition metric (answer for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box In each column for each group below Select ttle appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the vie!lami
type ('viT)
AA 'PIT
3a f.A I- A fdaJonty of wct.and with depress;ns able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B r, B Majolfty of wolland v;ith depress'ans able to pond water 6 inches to I foot deep
r- c r c Majority of Welland with depressions able to pond water 3 to C, inches deep
r-- D 6-- D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3o t- A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
6 Evidence that maximum depth of inurdal'onis between 1 and 2 feet
C Evidence that Maximum depth of wurdatxn js less than 1 foot

Soil Textum/Structuro - assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of tire three soil properly groups below. DjU soil pr of in th2 d�ranmant assessrnent area andscape
featuroFlake scl' obscrvaUons w*N�n the 12 inches Use most ro,,.'.cnt National Techn cat Cofninufte for Hydric Sc is nu Banc: for
regional indxators
4a. A Sandy soil
B Lowny or c;ayey sails exhiinting redr;X"'-'1wf)h1c fcaMes dxsPof .;ifs ca
C Loamy or clayey so;!s not exhibitrig rodox,morphic f," ­ ,vu in
D Loamy or clayey g!oyed soft
E Hislosol or his"c epipcdon
4b A Sot ribbmn < 1 inch
r F, SO I ribbon 2 11 inch
4C A No peat or rnur1k presence
8 A peat or rnuck presence
5. Discharge Into Welland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. ConsUer surface po'lutants or dlschaTges (Surf) and stib surface pollutants or discharges (Sub)
Examples Of 5uL-surface dischargas Include Presiuncu Of r1carby septc tank, undi!rgrourid s!crage tank (USTI etc
Surf Sub
(i' A A Little or no evidon", of pollutants or discharg�cs entering the assessment area
f- B x 6 Noticeable evidence of pollutants or 1srhargtn entering the woi!and and stressing, but not ovemiholming the
treatment capacity of !he assessment area
C C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or disctiargLs fpalthogLn, particulate, or soluble) entering Ina assessment area and
pritemmlly overwhelming the treatmeml capacity of flhe weluand (water discoloration, dead vogelation. excessive
sodimonta!ion odor)
6, Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at [cast one box In each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adlustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstrearn watershed (VIS) within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to trio
assessmicrit area (51l1), and va',Nn 2 miles and within the watershed draWrij 1,,.) the assessment area (2%1)r Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmorif ecoregions and 30 for-,( wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion,
Vj S 51,111 2M
r A F-_' A F- A ? 10% impervious surfaces
i" B 1"_ B f— B < 10% impervious surfaces
r c r" c r c Confined animal operations (cr other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
I' D F D f- D z 200,14 coverage of pasture
r" E F' E F' E 2 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly p!owcd land)
f F F F F F a 20% coverage of maintained grass1herb
F G ?" G F G ? 20% coverage of clear-cut land
Fw H F H F H Little or no opportunity to improve water qua!ity Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or ovLmank flow from affecting the assessment area
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment areatwatland complex condition metric
7a Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
(- Yes (-. IN a IfYes, continue to7b If No, skip to Ii
Wefland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the vietiand
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed
7b How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E shoUd be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer
i- A `a 50 feet
C B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
— t E
< 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c Tributary vvidth if the tributary is anastomosed, combine vAdths of ctlannersibraids for a total width
(- !: 15-fect wide (- > 15 -feet wide r' Cither opera water (no tributary present)
7d Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into thie tank of the tributary"open water?
(- Yes r No
7e Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
r Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet anj no regular boat traffic
Exposed ­ adjacent open water with wdtn z 2500 feet or regular boat tralfic
8. Welland Width at the Assessment Area - wetiand type.1wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box In each column. Select the average width for the wat!and type at the assessr-newtarea (VIT)
and the welland complex at the assessment arclas (,`JC)
VIVIT Vic
to A c= A 2 100 feet
B f B From 80 to < 100 feet
C C From 50 to < 8,10 feet
i" D t D From 40 to < 50 feet
C" E E From 20 to < 40 feet
F i F From 15 to < 30 feet
G t G From 5 to < 15 feet
H
H < 5 feet

9, Inundation Duration - assessment aroa condition metric
Anerr fior asscrismort aru,5 dc`narit !3r'.,lcform
A of shoo, dura!�')f inured ;liar (< 7 C01!'a,)-_Ut;VL 0,
B Edid icii'ce cf salurat:on li, th'oul ovid1cnico of inundation
-rg t, 3r,) C""r­'�'�J��r'�i d'Jy�' �"r
C", EE v d d .2 n c f 1 (,, r 1 g -,j,, bria 1, ': r i i r r d a o n c. t v-, r y I i, -dlurat:3n, ir,un� i C
10, Indicators of Deposition - assossmunt area condition metric
Cder ecent cicoos,!cr orily 1,-io pan! groivth smco d,_,positlrin)
A Sed logit deposr or,, j3 rwt f'_,xccss;1vo, but at alppr.','xia,,,;,c:y in„<,."ra', uiv­s
B S' e c 1 -n e , I d c P,7S i l 'm i is ex-essNe but not cvct%.lri, lrriing t`�e anrd
C sec ;-ncrl dcp"-'i�jc'n is, excer,5;ve and is c,lh W:, rn; rig tht., viowij
11, Welland Size - watland typeMotland complex condition niLtric
Check a box In each column. !nvolvos a GiS eff-I ,v;",h fi,-,r'd CV."""i�""s vIrd a,lu,a
(t :`<; f ijr',
U,
size cl' the viefland tit,)e CA"T" the s`zu 0 Ine ilvir_,Varid aPd lh'0 SZn fl',�J fili"��S.od 'd
Maa. u a o S,_'o Vle tj5ur PA "Inu a! for boinn arcs cA U ics'l ev: I! u at Gr' ares if a n Ic-'; I ;W.a 1 cicar (."'0 s t, t K fr"rt =a F -Vi
Wr Vic, R' (if app; lcablo)
A A
A z 5100 acres
F r" i n 100 t < 5V'0 ac'rf's
C C
C C FrOM 50 to < 10,0 aaroS
C D l'- D (' D From 25 to c 50 acres
c Fr' E t- E Frorn 10 to < 25 acres
F C F Frwn 5 to < 10 acres
f -G G G From I t o e 5 a --res
H 4' H 11 From 0 5 to < 1 acre
I l", I C' I From 0 1 to < 0 5 a cru
J
C1r, 'I C' J From 0 01 to 1 0 1 aCre
r" K r- K (- K , 0 01 acre or assessment arca is cca; cut
12 Wetland Intactness - wetland typo condition metric (ovaluato for Pocosms only)
C A Poccsin is trio full extent (, 909lo) of its natural landscape size
C' 0 PoCos;n is < 901% of the full extent of its natural landscaper size
11 Connectivity to Other Natural Area, - landscape condition metric
13a Check appropriate box(os) (a box may be checked In each column), Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment, This
evaUVes %vhether the wetland is vicH connected (Weli) wndllor loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape palch, 11he ccriliguous
rnetri -
c naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate) Borinda-i-res am fumiLd by four -lame roads regularly mairilalncd udfity
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or vAder, urban lands --apes field (pac!'Jre cap e") and agricuflure) or -01aler > 3,10 feet Wkl"�:t
VoJell Loosely
A A 2 500 acres
B t 6 From 1010 to < 500 acres
C C Fmrn 50 to c 100 acres
D 6- D From 10 to < 50 acres
E
C' E � 10 acres
F (- F Vlefland type has a poor or no conn aeon to other naturz0 habAals
13b Evaluate for marshes only.
C' Yes r No Welland type ties a surface hydrology connection to open, or fidal weVands
14, Edge Effect - wettand type condition metric {skip for all marshes)
May involve a G;S effort with field adustmcnt EstImate distanco, from wet and type Licuncary t3 arfificia! edges Amfldal edges innUlde
non -forested areas ? 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads requiaTry rn&nlained ufiMy line corridors arld dear -cults
Ccnsider the eight main points of the compass.
r-' A No artifi=cial edge within 150 feet in all direct;oni
8 No artificial edge wiffin 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) drectiors
C An artiflicial edge occurs vMhin 150 feet in rnare than four (4) d:nevi, rls or afea Is Cear-cut
M Vegetative Composition -assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is closo, to r0croice coed Vora in species present and thoit propcTlionq Loweir s1ralla composed of approprfat-a
spr cies. with exotic plants absent or sparse withirthe assiessibent area
to BVegficin is d4ferent ficreference corld,fls
on in pde
3s d,lvcrtprop M:, i!y or proM:,ns but still largely coroposed of natives spocios
charal-ensil-c of tft- v.,otland type IN s rriay incMds, cornn,,uni:ies of woedy natve spedos that dirvelop after clearcutling or
Ci-` aring it also cricludes comnriunificts viith ex,-',:cs present, tu! not danmna. t lovu a !a-ge poMon of tete expected strata
f'- ": Vegetaton sevoreiy a1cred hom, tfere nce in cocmpc6ition Expected sem. des P -e unnituraiiy absen' uo!anted siand3 of rcn
at least one stratum,
16, Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Novi-Udai Freshwater Marsh only)
A
vegelafi,,in d i iv-crs ity is Page. a nd is c ornp-cs cd P i iM a �y Of no 4 1 Ve SPaf'eS s I of X C
P Ve-aetill,om drvcrstly is lo%` ` or t ias > 10", to CO i�' covel, f eX3ti%l_'S
Vu-ols, -.5)
c,*aticon is dom�n,,'A bi ex— ': pecles (>50"�.cov-e' of ex�!;�

17, Vegetative Structure - assessment areatwotland type condition metric
17a Is vegetntion present?
Yes
(_ No ll'Yes comir-wetri l7b fftkj skipto"leh',16
I 7b Evaluate pu-cert mverago of assossalent area v',,gz3!Wion for all marshes only Skip to 17c for mon rr.arsh r;ct'ands,
A 1 25, coverage of vegatalmn
B e 251") co erase; of vc,,c,1a*!cn
17c Check a box In cacti colunin for each stratum. Fvauato Uh-'s portion of the "IcIric for non -marsh wetlands Constrdcr struct;Jno
in OiNlPaCe abOVC it!') @S,1eSSrocr',t area (AA) and the v,;Wland type (VJITj scparatLly
VIT
A A Canopy closed, or nearly closed vit'. ra!urai gaps as_�.ioc'Jatcd YiV
pros
6 B Canopy present but opened M'Ore U!nrir, na:ura) T1,"
cr (_'C C Canopy sparse or absent
A r' A Dense mid,stoil/,'sapling layer
gra (Z B is B ModCralo dermty mid slory,sap"nq layer
V
C C I`Ads!ory,sap;irg layer sparse or absent
A A Derise, shrub tayL,,
r._., 8 " B Moderate density shrub !ayer
r_. C C C Shrub layer sparse or absent
.0 f; A t—. A Dense herb layer
8 C' B is density herb layer
C (' C Herb layer sparse or absent
IS- Snags - wetland typo condition metric
r A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH or largo relative to species prcscrt and lands cape stabifity)
C- B Not A
19, Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric
A Nlaliorly of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diarnefer at breast height ((,)Bfi', rcany large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
C• B Majority of canopy tees have stems between 6 and 12 inches D8H few are > 12 inch DBH
(- C Majority of canopy t1reas are < 6 inches DDH or no trees
2T Large Woody Debris - wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris
r- A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relaflve, to specres present and landscape stability)
- B Not A
21- VagetationlOpen Water Dispersion - wetland typotopon water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open wafer in the growing season Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas Indicate open water
C' A f B i C r' D
22, Hydrologic Connectivity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely aster hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channe!ization, diversion, man-made berms beaver dams and stream incision
r'A Overbank and overland flow are not severely adored in the assessment area
i« B Overbank Romf is severely altered in the assessment area
C
Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area
L) Both overbank.and overland flow are severely altered in the assessr-nont area
Nearby shearn is incised res u1mg in firs ;led opportunity for overisai-A fici�.-j under norrrna' r_-infall evert

Wo1andS�Name
Welland Type
NC WAM Watland Rating Shoot
Accompanies User Manual Version 4A
Rating Calculator Version 4x
WXA
Bcittorn!and Hardwood Forest
Date
Assessor Name,'Organization
Notes on Fie:dAssessment Form (Y/1',I)
Presence oYregulatory considomuqns(Y/N)
�WeUandiointensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 fee*, of a natural tfibutary or otheropen water (Y/N)
Assessment area issubstantially aneredbybeaver (nN)
Assessment area experiences overbankflooding during normal naiffaUcond6ons (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
2/22/2O1S
J Harbour/ESI
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Function
Sub-funct:on
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM_
MEDIUM_
Sub -Surface Storage a dRetedon
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM__
Cnnditon
MEDIUM |
Condition/Opportunity
,nEomM�
Opportunity Presence? (v/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
EDIUyM_
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM_�
Opportunity Pnaauncm>(Y/N)
NO___
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM_
Cund}hon/Opporlunity
oxEoxUM��
Opportunity Presence? (Y/w)
NO�___
Physical Change
Condition
LOW___
CondidonK]pponun|ty
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (YvN)
NO___
Po||uoonChange
Cond|Uon
NA___
Condition/Opportunity
NA___
Presence?Opportunity
WA
Habitat
Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM�_
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM__
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Motrics/Nmes
Rating
Hydro�ogy
Condition
—MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM_
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM__
DpportunqyPresence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Cnnditon
MEDIUM |
Overall Wetland Rating __MEDIUM_-

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESS MENTFORM
Accornponlos User Manual Version 4.1
Rating, Cairulatorl/orsion,t-1
Welland Site Name VjLA Date 212201ii
Assessor NarnalOrganization J. f1wLour,ESi
------- --- -
Welland Type! Fiead,,v Pvc�'��t
Loviclill Ecareglow PedrTrnt Nearest Narned Water Body 13,' -aver Crcck
River Fla slnQn p e Fool m USGS 8,01grt Catalogue Unrt
Yes f- No Precipitation within 4i8firs? Latitudall-crigitude (doci -dogroasl 31' 7523 81.A 11'
Evidence of stressors affecting the assLssrnant area (may riot he within the assassmont area)
Fl-,,sw circle and!or nnaKv note on Inst Page it evl"A',ncc� F'f s apparvnit C-cns!dcr dcnpwltuina fronn it
ap.Proprlatirl in recant Fast (fjr nzi-iz�opproxmia"c"Y V..1., `i 10 Nck"�"-'Iny st'("S.'c'rs c, u, 'o but we not
1c file VlovJng
Hlydno!o9icil rnclll'flcatur- (oxni,,jeles d dv-,,:, beavw donlis dAes bi.,r,n5 pcird,; et,'
Surface and s;,,,b sunocedi 2-har,,
i gos it to the va,,,jrd ocurvit!i; obvious pir,-,,!A,!Onli pn,,soric�l
tanks unoorground stouigo tanks (USTs�, t Ia3cors etc
• vs of vegetal= stress "ex-1"TIP10S vcgctai�cn ;"orIL31y irisect da"'Majo, d, ,mss .torn dari,,ngn 5,'Vt M!U.-,'Crl
I-inhioelplant cornerunity Ocrat-on kfe-'Xoriplu3 rronvinq' Cicar cu!tsnj' exc'l;cs c": )
Is the assessment area Intensively managed? f'- Yes t, ;' No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to th;"ass-essmont
Aradramous fish
r r fil-re c,
federally protected species or Siatc, endangcn-�d o itv ned speias
NCDVVQ riparian buffer ru',: in effect
Abuts a Primary Nursery Alea (PrJA)
Publicly cwncd property
N C D�Msllcn of Coastal Manaupmcrt Area of Eriv,ioninental C,oncern (AEC) (;rdudinq Luffel)
i Abuts a stream will a NCDWQ dassiflcat'on of SA or supplcmental of lie,1,1,1 CRVV, or Trout
Des ignited NCNI-IP reference, comrnun;ty
Abuts a 303(d)-lisfed strearn or a tr:11'utary to a 3103,d)-Fsled slroarn
What typo of natural stream Is associated with the wetland, If any? (chuck all that apply)
I
Blackviater
r- Prownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of tae if�tovd;ng boxes).Lunar ViAnd i Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal Island? E- Yes r; No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? (" Yes
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding durinq normal rainfall conditions? C' Yes r:' it')
1. Ground Surface Condit! onlVagotatho n Condition - assessment area condition metric
Chock a box In each column. Consider alteral'on to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(`VS) in the assessment area Compare to reference wenand if applicable (see User Manual) If a reference is not appl�cablo
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effaict
GS VS
t;' A C -Ir A Not severe!y a!lered
vcNcle tracks, iex,.essi,*
O.iddertracks,bed-ding fifl soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation Siruclum
alterationexamplesmodhanicaldisturbance hefbicides salt intro ss ion (:whore appropriate]. exotic species, grazing
less diversity lit appropriate], hydro!ogic a1mratfon)
1 Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box In each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf} and sub surface storage capacity ana
dutalion (Sub) Consider both increase and decrease in hydrokigy Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of mtchlng quidanice for
North Camfina hydric soils (see USACE DistrIct websile) for the zone of influence of d;b;hQs in hydr'c soils A d;tch
,1 1 fool deep is consider", to affect surface water only while to ditch > 1 fool deep is expected to affect both surface and dotdh
sun-su,face viatur Consider trda! flccd;nq ricgJrre, if appIicab°
Surf Sub
A A Wafer sto, age capacity and (.Jiu- " n are
aij nM ai-'%red
B 'Y'later sto'age capacily or dura;lon are a:1,er d Lnuft not substan'aly ltypical:y not suffi;ccrit to change vcgc-Vcn�
r, c Wa,1,,ur storage capaac;ty or duralLn'
Lon e substanally (ty ' r";caVy ara,on sl fficient to resuft in vegefat,on
�le
chianfge) (examp!os dra'nfng flood�ng sLO cor,-,,,,,acluon� ex--ess,,e1injs)
3, Water StoragelSurfaca Relief - assessment area"wotland type condition metric (answer for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box In each column for each group below Seicct tne, appfzjpfia!i, sicrage for the a3sessmerit area (Mki and V�e
type (`NT)
PkA VvIT
3a (j'A C' A "'I'lionty of we'lana m dcpess;nn�s at!e is vat�r > 1 fl-Ic'
i '-'B
C-13 Majorty of vi:tn deprestons abfe to pcndviaier 6 ncf,es to 1 fo-t deeO
C-1 C (11 C Vajoray of vreVan '. w th depross;ons at2 to p.c.nd water 3 Ic 6 inches deep
o:' D 6' D Depressi-ons able l,', po-id walor e 3 intimes deep;
3 3
L, A Ev;donce that rnaximnumi depth cf inure la ur is creaer 11-ari 2 fegM
B Ev;denco that rriaxrnurn dept of inrindal�cn s 1 and 2 ftel
C Evideme that aiaxlnurn cb�pth, of iruricla,lcr vs less tMin 1 Icot

4, Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition molric
Check a box from each of the vinjo so!] property groups below, C"j tc�' 1fj
faatufe Nlake so;l ctserva':cris N"!Ih'n tn-"a 12" In'oh(m U:c rinost econ? Na� T, .:Yr? . _ r r,{r,rc , w; for I,ydnc r,;1'1_' ,u: -dance, for
fe,' ona' in`�calofs
4a A Sandy so
fs B Loamy Or clay")y S'oi�s Lxhi-hiting r;,,dcx:mcrphd,­, il�,,,,,"",-tl-.It,,,"", CT rh'_1C3'Ph-1'11u'_"'
C L
' o,, ,y o, claye_y sons rice
1 D Loamy or C!ay. y gluyud soO
rpdcn
4j t" A S',od ritLcrl < 1 ri,_h
Smi ct I rl-h
4 A td-_ Coal or M,j-,k
6 A Peal or mur* prc­.'ar'ncc
5, Discharge Into Weiland - opportunity rnotric
Check a box In each column. Consider surface po!jtanl, ri:ssnza ....�s (S:urf) and sub 51jfacu, putl�ut,,'ints or dsch, -,-'yes, ' =rah?)
Exannplos of suL surface d;s&c gu4 incl ide, pre-ence, of mcarLy ta,ik uandcrgrQund s,cfwg' tai,k tU' T) cl-
Sort Sub
i A k;' A Little, or no evicionce of pol:utint5 of dl -,,c mg s entLring, in: tl x x �l,.wr'.t. rveA
0 Noticeable evidence cf po!a,tan!s cr discnargei enlprrg lle weIlavd and sti,,_,ss4g but net cvf.,rvw , hc!mlng t:w
t(Caln'Ore capadty rf the issessmLint area
f C C Nol;coaNe evidence of po:iutw-its or d�szhalrqes llpa!oog,-_,n parl<culate w so!ub!a', entoong the asseNsnrlent arta arld
poficnt,afly eve rvlrhe�lrninj the trfeafnnent capat tty of Me vir-Wand (vialer d-ls_okoraton, dead vog3taticn eXze%s,v,,_1
scd`tnentatan, odur,
3, Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at toast one box In cacti column). Eva 'uatl'on jnvc:vs a GIS effort =h field aJJUS!rT1Cnl Consider SCUffl-s
draining to assessment area viOiin entire ups!reayn watershed t'ViSvv;;hin 5 mfles and wilhin the wa'orshed dra'ininri to the
assessment am -a aril within 2 miles arij within the vialorshied draining to trio assessrnerit area (2f,I) Effective ripanin butlers
are considered to be E0 fie et wida i1n, the Coastal Plain and Red :crit cfcorep)ns at,ld N feet wi72 in the Blue Ridge Mountn';ns ecoregion
WS 9111 2M
A 71 A P A a 10% impervious surfaces
B 8 B < 10% impervious surfaces
C C C Confined animal operaVlons (or other iac­al, cor,.ceritmted so urce of pcizutants)
D D 1' 0 201.-,j coverage of pasture
E E E m 20% coverage of agricultural land tgu!ar!y p!owed land)
F' FF F F a 20% coverage of mainlalnLd grass/herb
G F G G a 20% coverage of clear-cut land
F;� H C 11 F' I -I Little or no opportunity to improve waIer qualqy Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic aitQraftns
that prevent drainage or overbank Po,,v frons affecting the assessment area
Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment arealwolland complex condition metric
7a Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open viater?
r., Yes (- NO if Yes, continue to 7b If No skip to Mal,12c 8
Welland buffer need only be prosent on one side of the water body klake buffer judgmend based or) the average v�,Uh, ofthe ,.et:. inn
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been remov-d or disturted
7b How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weitsind? Driscrifoor E shouyd be selected if cl'tches effectively bypass the tl.jffklr
A ; 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E e 5 feet or buffer bypassed by dio hos
7c Tributary w'd'h, If the tributary is anastoTnosLd combine vAdtlis of channeWbiaids for a total widin
' e 15 -feet wide C" > 15 -feel wide t--' Other open waler (no InLut3ry piesent)
7d Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tnbutaj,,'open wale,,9
(- Yes (-. No
7er Is tributary or other open water she'lLrcd or exposed?
4-. Sheltered - adlacent open water v,�zh width < 2500 feet in no nqu,'ar Lalt jifl".r;
Exposed - adjazent open water width zt 2500 fuct or rf.Sulw boal lra!fis
8, Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - waltand typetwotland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box In each column. Select the av-2raga width, for !ha v,Ll;and type at the a s,,�ss� mn q, ' ,
S V I area fff TI
and th, vvutland ccrrip!ox at the asses arnen,', weas (,4'Cl. Ser, User Malnuai Nr 1v','T and V4C boundaries
A k 10 0 feet
c- B r, L, From 950 to < 100 feel
— C
r, C
Frorn 50 to < 80 feet
D
f- D From 40 to < at? feet
E (- E' From 30 to < 40 Ice!
F r'F From 15 to < 3.0 feet
r- G G From 5 to < 15 feet
F aH
<5 feet

S. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition Metric
Answer for asl�essarert area dominant landform
';'A
Evidence of snort,dura!icrr inundation consecutive days)
C" 8 EvMerrcr; of saluraloion vi�!nnut evidonce ref inunda[ml
( C Evidence of long diurat'on inundation or very long duration jrlUrdati,)n (7 C,, Kj a-ays 0, frmrej
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition rnetric
or it cent de ' vcsil on only fnr) plant grmv1h smce .11,,posil:on)
cA Sudrrnunt deposition is not excessivc, but at approximateiy naiural lLvel�
B
Sod:merrt depos;!ion is excessive but riot overwrickming the wc!L,'I
rd
C
Secirrrienil deposflon is excessivia and is overviheirning the wc:land
11, Writland Size - wofland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box In cacti column. Invoives, a GIs effo'-t v";:h flojd ajJusttnert, This fm,,ffic t1fee aspocts Of une arca in--,
"r,',,,r if appGabr1 i.
size of!hc wet!aiid type (`,,J) tho size cf the wellard cmi,,plex e o
and the sizf the forested =�',(
4ind ll 11 , ser User
ManuA See the User Mlanual for bounlairias of thrz,,sro evaluat;'On aroas If ra u ate, wrt area is cl,'m­cijt, sole -:1 "K" fcr the FW cc`umn
"JT V FVI of appiicabre)
A A f- A a 50 acres
B r' 6 B From 100 1c, < 6010 icres
0 to < 100 acres
C C' C C C From 5
1) C" D D From 25 to e 50 acres
E f" E E From 10 to < 25 acres
F
f- F f- F From 5 to < 10 acres
r-' G 6' G G From I to < 5 acres
C H f- H H From 0 5 to < I acre
r I r" I I From 0-1 to < 0 5 acre
C J C J C J From 0 01 to < 0 1 acre
(- K ( K C' K < 0 01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
1201 Welland Intactness - wetland typo condition metric (evaluate for Pocoshis only)
A Pocosn Is the full extent (a 90%) of its natural landscape size
B Po sin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size
11 Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
43a Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be chocked In each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment This
evaluates whether the wetland is wall connected (Well) and,or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, Me Contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate) Boundaries are forrred by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
Ime corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes fields (past -.ere open and agriculture), or water > 300 fee! wde
Wall Loosely
C' A (- A 2: 500 acres
r B r'B From 100 to < 500 acres
r c r, C From 50 to < 100 acres
D r' D Fiorn 10 to < 50 acres
E r- E < 10 acres
r F (- F Weiland type has a poor or no connection to athcr natural habitats
13o Evaluate for marshes only
'- Yes (- No Weiland type has a surface hydrology connection to open watersfstream or tidal wetlands
14. Edge Effect- wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May Involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Est'mato distance from wetland type boundary to ar!"'w-Jal edges Artificial edges include
non,forested areas 2! 40 fact wide such as fields. development, roads regularly maintarried ulu4ty line corridors and clicar-cuts.
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
(.- A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
r, B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
(" C An arlifidat edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) d'recbons fir assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
C' A Vegetation is close toreference condition in species present and their proportions Lower strata composed ol'appropriate
spec es, vAth exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in spaces diversity or propon, ons but still largely composed of native species
&ara-lenstrc of the wetland typo This may include communities ofweedy nallive species that develop after dearcutting or
clearing It also includes communities with exotics present but not dominant, over a large portio; of the expected s:rala
r C Vegetation severely altered frons reference in composifion. Expected species or,:- unnaturally absent {plaited stalni:13 of non
ck,aracleristic species or at least one stratum inapproPriate!y connposed of a sing!,' species) Exotic species are a orninarit in
at #,east one stratum
16, Vegetative Diversity- assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
i -A Vegelation d'vcrs;ty is high and is composed primarily of nalivo species (<1100 cover of elocs"
B 'age tafion diversity is low G,,- teas > 10 i, to 15C% -over of exotics
Vegetation is dorninaled by exotic species cover of exct;as)

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment arcalwatland typo condition metric
17a Is vegetation pruont?

NC 'iWauamJRating Shoot
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version *1
Welland Site Name VV LA
Welland Type Headwater Fcrest
Notes onField Assessment Form (Y'N)
�
Presence o/regulatory considerations (YIN)
�WeWandiuintensively managed (Y/N}
Assessment ama is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area iseubstanuaoya/te,cdbybeaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfal[ conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area ismnocoastal island (Y;N)
Sub -function Ratin
Function
Summary
Sub -function
Da t P
2�2`2O1G
J HarbouvES!
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
HydaloQy Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Sub -Surface Storage and Reteh
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HxGH__
Condition/Opportunity
H*GH�__
Opportunity Presence? (Yx1)
YES __-
Pamco!a!eChange
Condition
HxG{___
Condit/un/Opportunity
Nu\___
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
w4
Soluble Change
Condition
KVG+___
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH __-
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
_yEg___
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH___
Cond|oomOpportunity
HIGH__
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
yxO___
Pollution Change
Condition
NfL__
Condition/Opportunity,
NA__ -
Opportunity Presence? Y/
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM_
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
HIGH
Vegetation Compositon
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
VVa�rDuah�
Condition
H�H
Conduionx]pponun|�
H|GH__.
Opportunity Presence? (Y/M)
YES�__
Habitat
Conuimn
HlGH
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

NC WANT WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 41
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Weiland Silo Name WPB Date 2'22'2016
Wetland Ty pe r7
L-Head,o) ater Forest Assessor NamejOrganization J, HaibriurIES!
Level III Ecoragion LFit dura ' Nearest Named Water Body Beaver Crook
River Basin
LISGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 0303000,2
i,;, Yes (" No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Lonrlitude (decl-dortroes) 35,757E 76 8709
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please Circle nrid/or make note cn last page if evidiuirc,' of sere ,ors is apparent Consider depantufL f,, r0erence if
appropriate, in recent past (f,,,r instailcui apprwXlulatully wi:t';n tag yicars) Nrte,,;'udhy stre� surs include, but are nct Hanit,:A
to the following
Hydro!og'cal rnodificaflons (examplos ditches, (Jams leaver dams dikes. bcirris ponds otc
Surface and sub -surface discharges into hio vietland (exaa-plas d4scharges containing obvious pcilutants presence Onowny
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USI s) V.cg lagoons e!,,
Signs of vegetation stress (examples vegelation rnortality, rnscct darnago d;scaso storm darnago sall intrus!on etc
HabitaGlp:ant community al.'Qrat ;or) (examples nnowing clear culling. exot;cs etc
Is the assessment area Intensively managed? Yes =,;, No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
i Anadromous fish
federally protected species or State endangered or threatened spa cies
NCDVVQ riparian buffer rule in effect
r Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (FNA)
Publicly owned property
lR N G. Division of Coastal Management Area of Sriviromr-rital Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supp!ennerital dassificativiris of HQ101 CRW Or Trout
Designated NCNHP reference community
Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 301,d) 4isted stream
What type of natural stream Is associated with the wetland, It any? (check all that apply)
Blackwaler
Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) C, Lunar # Vvriid C Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? i Yes No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity at duration substantially altered by beaver? (-'Yes f;' No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? C- Yes r. No
1. Ground Surface Candlition/Vagotation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Chock a box In each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland If applicable (see User Manuel) If a reference is riot applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect
GS VS
C" A A Not severely altered
B B Severely altered over a maJorily of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples vehicle tracks excessive
sedimentation, fire-ploiw lanes, skidder tracks, budding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structute
alteration examples mechanicai disturbance befbicides salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species grazing
less diversity (if appropriate), hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Chock a box In each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub) Consider both increase and decrease irehydrologyRefer to the current NRCS lateral effect ci'ditching gwdance for
North Carolina hydric soils (see USAGE Wilrnincton District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils Aditch
!: I foot deep is considered to affect surfa.-a water Only whlle a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect bot'i surface and d1ch
subsurface water Consider tidal flooding regime, if app:!Catte
Surf Sub
C A f- A Water storage capacity and duialion are rat a!! -.r, -,d
B Water storage capacity or duralk-mi ae altered but not substint'ally (typically not sufficient to chancy{ VgielarLSIn)
C 1: C Water storage capacity or duratlicn are substant ally aitered (typicaily, atleration suMcient to result in vee ,tatmlro
change) (examples drain,ng_ flood ,rig, sod cnaipacton, fil,<'nq excessive sedrnenlat;cn underground utility lines)
1 Water StoragoiSurfaco Relief - assessment areafwattand type condition metric (answer for non -marsh wetlands only)
Chock a box In each column for each group below S&eot the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (VVT)
AA WT
3a f- A ri- A MaJority of wefland will" depiiess�,ons able t3 pond vlatv > I four duep
(_8 r, B Majority of we"'grid with depress:ons ab,e to pond water 6 inchus to 1 foot deep
r c r- c maionty of wetiand will,, depress ns able to pond vialter 3 to 6 inches deep
(;' D C. -r D Depressions able to pond vrsler < 3 inches deep
,o r'A Evidence That maximum depth of inundaticin rs gieal:LF than 2 feet
C- B Evidence tniat maxirnum depth of inundal?an is between, I and 2 feet
f" C Evidence that maximium depth of mundator, is less Men 1 foot

4 Sall TexturelStructure - assessm ant area condition metric
Chock a box from each of the three soil property groups, below Di, in td,.ii7i:naii are -3
,(,,,a 1. u re P.13k(" so:1 cbs,',,Va!i�-,M3 the 12 Inchu, U SIC' 1-� 0' SI ieL L! Fl, ech C' w 'R;., H yJF,Z' S, 15 Cj I'da I e f "I r
rc-inna; irid,iators
4a C' A 'Sai�d/ 5""ii
trrarny crday.riy s0i's
C
Loamy --, ddyi'y 5613 not
t
T L riar iy or clayey g' ye so;i
F Hlstosol or hislic epxpodlon
4b A Sol ribbon < I inch
B Soil ribbmn y1 Irrch
4i, i� A N o peal Or nnuck prcisenze
ra A pcal at n Lick pfcs,,rco
6. Discharge into Welland - opportunity metric
Chock a box In each column, Ucrs:d:r ('Surfr ord 51)b surfa-e cr J;sct�arr_zi,, (-SLID'
Exim,cles of sub suirface diszharges indude prE'.-cnce of tark u-dur:,
gtoi-ind sl--rng_ t;-(USJ)
Surf Sub
6;' A A !Jtfle or no evidence of pollutants or ds:,Marilcis emo,irg the as, ,ssrnont a
8 B Noticeable evidLnce of Po!:L1fW!!S Or d;SCna:g'V5 Cuteiii-ij. thi-, wcfland mid strest!nf Out not
treatment capairAy of ft'3 MOSSRICIA area
C
Noticnabie evidence of oo1!u!ar%ts or dist-;ats alnrigen, pj,1t,OU!j'Q, Of SDiljt;!Q) Ln'0F1rK1 t'10 Wee aird
potemia!ly cvervinelining in,, treal"Tient capa":?y cf tr r wctiand piatcr di, co!'a abiwi d2 ad vegotation, ox--essive
sodir-ncn1,a!jcn Odor)
6, Land Use - cpporlunity metric
Chock all that apply (at least one box In each column). Ervalual,on invoives a GIS efffort w:fti ficlid adjucluhent Consider soorces
draining to assessment area vilqUn entire upstrearn 'walash ed MS) wltnw 5 r rind Wine watershed draimng to ti,,e
assessment area (5M), and w.ithm 2 miles arid wiflnm li)(f w3ic-snival dra�mrg to tre a-.;sossrncw area l2M) Effc.,Jive riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 lect wide in the Coastal Plim and P;cdrnort econagic.ns end 30 feet wide in the Sii Picini? Mouroin, eci-mQcj;,,n
VIIJ S 5 M 2 M
A f;% A s A -a 101"u impervious surfaces
B B B < 10% impervious surfaces
C F C C Confined animal operations (or ctner local concentrated source of pOulants.)
D
r D f D a 20% coverage of posture,
E F,�M E F E e 20% coverage of agricultural land (rOgulady p:owland)
F I F f F 'a 20% coverage of maintained grass herb
G G r G a 2W',`7 coverage of clear-cut land
H H I' H Little or no opportunity to improve water qja4ty Lark of opportunity may result from hydrologic arterarions
that prevent drainage or overbank ffc,.i ftom afflectnq fine assessment area
T. Welland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment areae' otland complex condition metric
7a Is assessment area wilhin 50 feet of a tributary or other openwatior?
(-' Yes k-- No If Yes continue to 7b if No skip, to Me'ric 8
VVet'and buffer need only be present an one side of ',he water body klalre buffer Judgment Lased on the average vvidth of tne welland
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removcd a,, distuibcd,
7b Flow much of the first 50 feet from the bank is viciland 7 Descnptor E should be selected if d1ci)os effectively bypass the buffer
r A a 50 feet
B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feel or buffer bypassed by cirt"hes
7c Tributary width if the tributary is arraston-rosed COrnt"310 Widths -A cnarinuls/!;ra�ds for -3 tela! width
t— S 15 -feet w'dia r' > 15 --feet wide (-' 011er open water (no Inbwary present;�
7d Do roots Of assessment area vegetot;on extend irito the bank of the trib;favi iopen waWir?
Yes ' No
ie Is tributary or Other open water shc1tered or exposed?
r- Sheltered - ad"'acent opera Water w'h widtin < 2600 fit and no regu!ar groat traff.c.
(- Exposed - adjacent open waler widlio a 25M feet or regu!-w tcal traffic
8, Wafland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland typelwoffland ccmpI,-x metric (evaluate for riparian walands only)
Chock a box In each column. Seloot the average vi:dth for the viollaod typu at the ass,-,ssinont area iT)
and tric wel,!and comp,ex at, the as3essiricnt areas See icer fol VIT aind 'AC LcuricMJes
VVT VINE
C; A 4- A 2: 1 C feel
r" B 6 From 20 to < 100 feet
C C Fron150 to < 80 f�:,l
D
C' 0 Frw 1 40 to < 50 feet
F E From 30 to < 40 feet
C F F From 15 to < 30 fool
G J..G From 5 1d < 15 feet
H
H - 5 fcot

9, Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area rlom:narit landforin
t-- A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive, days)
B Evidence of satiraiion wi1iout evidence of inundation
C' C Evidence of long dufa,son inundation or very tong. duration inundatmi (7 to 3_1 ccnsir..;'ve days cr miorc-.,
M Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric
ConsiJc­ rece,,nal dtapcsltlon cilly (no plant g, owin since deposiilcrl)
A Sodgnunt delposQon is not excessive, but at approximately natural lovcl,a
B Sedirrent deposTon is ex,,:ossive, but not overwholming the wetland
C" C Se,,`rTlen! del:i0s&rn It excessive and is ovor,,thelming the wetland
11, Weiland Size — wetland typirlilwatland complex condition metric
Check a box In each column. Involves a CIS oftort iI field adliqis*ment This rnefi'c thfLa aspects of the wotlwrd area We
size of the vIietland type (101T) file size of the wetland complex ar-A the size cf 1f,e (cre5led lvo:;and CFS'") (-f app.,-aHe, see User
Manuai) See the User Manual for boundaries of thicso evaluation area,-, If assess tont area is clear•:;jt sr!ect T" for the FA' Column
WIT 104'C' PW (if applicable)
roti A C' A A ?_ 500 acres
B f" B S From 100 to e 500 acres
r c r Cc C From 50 to < 100 acres
D C' D r'D From 25 to < 50 acres
E r E (— E From 10 to < 25 acres
(-'F r' F r— F From 5 to < 10 acres
C' G CG t""G From 1 to < 5 acres
H iI H e;' H From 0 5 to < I acre
I (_ 1 (11 From 0 1 to < 0 5 acre
J (- J C' J From G01 to <01 acre
C" K C K r' K < 0 01 acre or assessment are,, is clear-cut
12. Welland Intactness — wetland typo condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
r A Pocosin is the full extent (2! 909,b) of its natural landscape size
C" 8 Pocosin is < 901;S of the full extent of its natural landscape size
13, Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(os) (a box may be chocked In each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) andfor loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate) Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four lane road or wider. urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture) or water > 300 feet wide
Well Loosely
r— A t A ? 500 acres
B From 100 to < 500 acres
r C I— C From 50 to < 100 acres
f— D 6;' 0 From 10 to < 50 acres
E r E < 10 acres
F (— F Welland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13t Evaluate for marshes only
(— Yes (— No Welland type has a surface hydrology connection to open walmrsistrLam or tidal wetlands
14, Edge Effect — walland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estirnate distance from viefland type boundary to artificial edges Artificial edges include
non -forested areas a 40 feet wide such as fie -Ids development roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
r A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
r-- B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
r C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear cut
15. Vegetative Composition— assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
C' A Vegetaftn is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions, Lower strata cornposed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
s.
B Vegetation is different from reference conditicn in species diversity or proportions. but still largely composed of. native species
characlLbstic of the viefland type This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcuttjng or
clearing It also includes communities with exulics present, but not dominant over a large portion of the expected strata
r' C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at !Last one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species) Exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum
16, Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
r'A Vegetation diversity is high and is ccmposed primarily of natJ,.,2 species (<I covcj, of exoFics)
a
Vegetatilon d'Iversity is low or has > 10% to 50`% cover of exotics
Yr' C Vegelal'on is dominated by exotic species cover ofexcucs)

17. Vegetative Structure - assessment arclallivelland type condition metric
17a IS vcgtatalrnn pf,_,seni?
r-` Yes i'-, No If Yius. cownue to 17L If No st,,!p t ) Metric 18
17b Eva!uate percent cove gage cf assessment area vcgeta';on for all marshes only Skin to 17c for rw)n rrarsh wet!ands
A � 25,.V1 coverage of vegetation
B e 215�`� coverage of vegetation
9.1c Check a box In each column for each stratum Evaluate this polon of [fit, nictnc for non-rnar3h wetlands Conslder strur-A2h'a
in arrsrace
above the
assessment area (AA) and the tifland type (ViTl, selpuma!oly
AA
WT
A
A
Cancpy closed or newly dfoscd Uh natural gaps ,Ah ra" lral plc,',es3es
0
Or
Ca0OPY (,resent, bUt OpelICId FYI, e I than natural gip
C
C C
Canopy sparse or absent
A
A
DLnsP mid story!saplinq layer
r rq
B
Moderate density tr0d s!ory"sapling layer
t;' C
C
I'A'd story sapn, layer sparse or absent
A i- A Dense shrub layer
8 a= B M.,.Aerale density shrub layer
C i C Shnib layer sparse or absent
r A i A Dense herb layer
(_1 B r+ B Moderate density herb layer
Z. i_—
C ("r C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric
A Large snags (rnore than one) are visible (> 12,inches DBH, or large relative to spcci':s pre sent and landscape stability)
Net A
19. Diameter Class Distribution - wetland type condition metric
r A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameler at breast height (DBH)� rnany large Imes (> 12 inches D8H) are
present
8 Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DOH, few are > 12-onch DDH
r c maiurity of canopy trees are < 6 inches 08H or no trees
20, Large Woody Debris - wotland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed n3tUral debris.
r-7 A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability)
("' 6 Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion - wetland typolopon water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tli Freshwater
Marsh only)
&:,,Iect the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid while areas indicate open water
t"A^
1 it t C t D
q, 4�
, Kk
22, Hydrologic Connectivity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, seclimentatUcin, channelization, diversion, man made berms beaver dams and stream inciision
i- A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area
r-' B Overbank flaw is severely altered in the assessment area
r, c Overland Pow is severely altered in the assessment area
Both overbank and overland now are severely altered in this assess;-nent area
Notes
Nearby streams incised resulting fti limited opportunity for oveibink flovi under nor ,jai rainfall event.

NcWAMm*tlandRating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Weiland Site Namem8rB Date 2/22/2016
VVw8anUType Headwale,Fo/osi As*mmsorNam�Orqanzohom J Harbour/ESI
Notes onr'e|dAssessment Fc, n{Y/N} ___yES__.
Presence ofregulatory oonmdo,at.ons(Y/N) NO
Welland isintensively managed (Y/N) NO___
Assessment area is located wthin 50 feet of a natural tibutary or offier open water (Y/m> «O�___
Assessment area issuhntan8oUyaltered bybeaver (YiN) NO___
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/m) NO �
Assessment area isonwcoastal island (Y/N) mO___
Sub -function Rating Summary
-Funct"on
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH__
vA�__
Sub -Surface Storaand Rete Vn
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH}___
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N}
yES__.
CondiDonlOppnrtunih
HIGH
L7W�__
nm=o
nnn'�vp,^p:ne,/v/m�
YES
Particulate Change
--___. —__
Cnnd|bon
HVG+___
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA_'
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence? (vx1)
vA�__
Soluble Charge
Condition
MEDIUVM_.
Cond|dnn"OpportunnY
__-HVG{___
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N}
yES__.
Physical Change
Condition
L7W�__
CnndiUomOpportonity
LoVu
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO___
PuUouonChonge
Condition
NAL___
Condit|onx]pportunity
Nf
Opportunity Presence?
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW__.
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW___
Vegetation Coiti
__---Condition
MEDIUM
Function
MetricsiNotes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MK]H
Cond;(ionxOppnrtunhy
MKaH���
Opportunity Presence? (Y/m)
YES
Habitat
Cond/\vn
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 41
Rating Calculator Version 41
Welland Site Name cas nent Date 2,22/2016
WetlandTypell Botlor*�-.1�,,Tldl-iLirdv�odFcr�,st Assessor NamwOrganization J HarboarIS1
Level Ill EcGregionFlc'dn-,,j , i , i t Nearest Named Water Body
RiverBasmf
Core Fear USGS 8.0igit Catalogue Unit (1:103C 002
Yes
No Procipitallon within 43 tars? Lafi,tudo1ongitudo (d2L_,-degrees) M 7511 73 ?
Evidence of stressors affecting Wo assessment area (may not bewithin the assessment area)
P;case cirde and"or rot,- Or laamt Prag,-., it evil,.'? ce of c. s rs rs (Ccr,',,,der d,pzvture firc'mr, refer .r> -.k, :f
n nic
pp,upnate, in ruccrit oast 'for rStu nce nppri,4 ii:ahr_r JU' yoara I`4 1, .,,­,vlly in%,fun, bUt @rt° r'Ot hTlitCd
to Viafowatlrig
Hydirc!cgical mcc;fica:;cris lexanriples d,3rrs boj,,er dpi-rs dOkLii, Lorm,'s frd,,5 ct;1
Surface and slb.surfjcra d achorg�.,s Irito 111'a wetland ,exa;rrp!e,,s d sctho,gps ccn!,j,mng ob,�'aus P14ilu'll""; nvll_�crv:o cof f-lar"Y
sept:c lanks, undfwgr-ound Um,! 5 (USTs �, tioj lagcccs, utw
Signs of vcgcta�,mn st:ess taxa nnplc's vege�soli on ri mss damige a,_:, n dam3gu cart intrl.,. ,!wi e!� I
• liab"OVIOlant corn"IlLin;1Y a;terz)!6cn cboair-cjt.rq elte
,
Is the assessment area intensively,ry,,
managed? 'S No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
Anadrornous fish
Federally protected spoc;es or StaC-_� ond_avgcred or ttgLo"..,
'ned Spo,_ieS
NCD,vQ riparian buffer inle in effact
Abuts a Primary Nursery Arco (PNA!
Publicly owned property
NC Division ofCcasta! Ccricerin (AEC) (in„tidingbufferj
Abu sastrLarfiw)',IiaNCDV-J,,O--�ass;fcal;rr.,cfSAorsjppiencr;*,alclassilcati,-rsofHQ'v'I ORVV crTout
Des'griated NCNHP reference community
F' Abuts a 3C3(d) iisted stfearn or a tvpulary to a 303(d)-1;51ed sLream.
What type of natural stream is associated with thowettand, if any? (check all that apply)
Blackwater
r Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal check onia of the fr ovi-.ng lccxes'. r tuna, (- Yv`nd Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? r-, Yes r.;- No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? i Ye's No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? C, Yes 6No
11, Ground Surface Cond"ItionNegetation Condition - assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider a:1eratJon to the ground surface (GS) in the assessrnent area and vegetation structi,,re
(VS)mthe assessment area Compare to reforence wetland if applicable (see User Manual) If reference is not appl;cat4e,
then rate the assessment area based ,n evidenceof an effect
GS VS
(-- A (-- A Not 5evore!y arty red
r 13 r, o Severely altered over a r-na,prqy of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples, vehicle tracks,ex��ess;ve
scdirrenta!on fire-p!aw Uartes skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction' obvious pollutants) (vegetation S!nuclure
alteration examples mechanical 6sturbanice, herb sat intrusion (vihero appropriate), exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [Japprojeriatal hydroi#ca!teraton;
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration - assessment area condition metric
Check a box In each column. Consider surfac-e storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub) Consider boq-, increase arid decrease in hydrology Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of 61ching guidance, for
North Carolina hydric soils (see USACE Wdn�irgton D1s=tixiLts;!e) for the z:_-ne of influence of ditches in hydric scils A6p;,h
s I foot deep is considered to affect surface water only while a ditch - I loot deep i

4, Soil Texture/Structure - assessinent area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig Pmf.!e ;,- thie asse�Mcrt atrldscare'
B o
feature,MalcL So;f Otecrvas�cns vWhm tre 12 mchcs Lli.cent ,,e rrsst rcnt rlat:onal Tr-' hn ca' (:cf t n",ilt"l� T - S g-i:dnnce for
4a A Sandi sc:1
B Lrariiy or rjayey 5o:!s exni:b;t.riq i'e"'C"A�mcrr'i'-' fOa!,,j-as of rllyp-'Iriie-�
C Loarny or dayey not eithlb t re do rror;ih
D Loamy or clayey g!lsyed sail
E Hislosol or Nstic epipf-Jori
4V, CA So I ribbon < 1 inch
6' 13 Soil rtb'-Org a I iron
4c C;' A No peat or triu,k preserve
(- 6 A Doat or muck presori-ce
5, Discharge into Welland - opportunity IT110triC
Check a box in each column. Consid-or su1aco i"r arid sub-Burface poi�Man1s cr dizcnzi,�Ls (Sut)
Exarripieof sab strface discharges Include pirescice of lnearby ",p .-, taoil, tj,-,d4cr0r,-und st'-,riiju, tank ('LIST; et,,:
Surf Sub
A 6= A Utt;e or r,,a evidence of pcaijtarts Cc ills I narg"cis cm.oqlrj vassos5mcnt area
B r B Nctccobfio evidence of pol:utants or rDnQl'ng "hic, wC, and and but not Inc
treatment Capacity of the assessmcrll area
C -' C Not'ceable evidence, of pol!uJants or disC,,"13Mjale or 50!Utle) entering the assessaient area arid rid
pwl�cu!,
poteritAly overvvhr,,!m;ng, thy! treatt:ent capw. :*y rjfthe i,,.eeland Ewater discolora!;ori, de -ad vegetation excessive
sedimentation cdco
G. Land Use - opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Eva: ja'on involives a GIS effort wilti field ad,,ustment Consida'r sours
draining to assessment area within entire upstmarl. wa'ershed (1043', wthin 5 rnites 7r�d within the ittatersheddra:ning to the
assessment area (9.1), and within 2 miles grid wl;tNn the watershed dia:nlrg, to th-e -assesstnent area (M) Effective riparian buffijrs
are considered to be 50 feet vt4do ;n the Coastal P:an and Psvdiront and 30 feet wile in the B!ue R!dge klou,iia ms eccrej,;n
WS 5f.1 2M
A %% A r'.; A z 1 O,u impervious wirfaces
0 r 6 r 8 < lolifi impervious surfaces
f C C f C Confined anuria! operations (cr other fcca' concentrated source of pollutants)
D f D f D a 20"1,, coverage of pasture
r E r- E F" E a 20'71� coverage of agricultural lard (regularly p! vcd brd",
F a F I
F a 2G o coverage of main wined gra ss.Thorb
G G G 2 201/, coverage of c3ear-cut land
Fi H H Little or no opportunity to irnprove vya!u quality Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or rvertank flow from effecting the assessment area
7. Welland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment arealwetland complex condition metric
7a Is assessment area within 50 'act of a tributary or ather open water?
(-- Yes C No If Yes, continue to 7b It No skip to Metric 8
Welland buffer reed only be present on one side of the wWor body Make buffer Judgment based on the average width ofthe wctrand
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbLd
7b How much of the fit 50 feet from the bark is we!,and) Cescriptor E should be selected if d;tches effectively bypass the buffer
(- A Z! 50 feet
1-- 8 From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to , 30 feet
D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet g buffer bypassed by ditches
7e. Tributary width If the tributary ;s arnastimosed cccrn'.Arie wdns of charinelsibraids for a total width
(-- " 15 -feet wide (- > 15 -feet wide ;- C'Mer open water lino tributary present)
7d Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into, the nilk of the tribu!arylupen. wdioO
r- Yes (- No
7e 13 tributary or other open water shollierLd or exposed?
r. She!tered - ad; rant open water with mdtb < 25CO fact "i -j Pioleg lies boat traffic
Exposed - adPcLnl open water wth MIth a 3500 fLetQF mgu!a- boat traffic
8, Welland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland typetwetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box In each column. Select the averages ;air for the wetlarid type at the assessment area WfT)
and the wet!and complex at the assessment areas See User Mianual fa,- Val` and VJC bourdades
WT WC
r A it- A a 100 feet
B (" B From 80 to < 10-0 foot
C t-- C From 50 to < SO feet
C D C' D From 40 to < 50 fcet
i— E C' E From 30 to < 40 feel
r F f- F From 15 to < 30 feet
G C' G From 5 to < 15 fest
H < 5 feet

9 In.undation Duration- assessfurent area conditioll 1-retric
nrea
A of va1 durs'-,,r,
E3
Ev� 0 ci n-Inca�,cn
ry
g n- ndzizioor ti` -y tor ± du ra:.i.-i r),,;,n'r
0 Indicators of Deposition - assessment area Gond;lionmetric
�Ims:rjo, ur.eJ on cin y (1t0 pla-it g - h s:nc.e
A is n:,", ex-ess;vc, but It Qc
B dcpc�:or- is -,,iX--css;ve tul n".n
dmnart dco_s�:,Cw is andl
11 Wntland Size, - watiand typo wetland complex condition fnetric
Check a box in each cohnnn, lnt��,�Iv�,�S a CS of, ,* %v!�") f e�d
v,,,,:am' ty'r,3 i',.'dT"l t, c, t'i,,L, of lh� W-1, @riJ 1-1",1Tp ',-,X antIr', S, f,,-,r_',1'1,i," rj, rVi) lz�,' =b`e
cliv Ll _,, Miriml fcr Cf ri a -c3 s K li-a F -V",
Vii f lif
A C A i A �! 5011' actes
5 r, P3 8 Froar 1'l t at , 1" 0 0 a C r C
c ti c r c F 0 !,-� -, I G mere.
D D i D Ft 5 "0
E
E From 131,0 25 a -,ies
F r", F F Front 5 to , I,) ai-res
G 6 G G Fran; 1 to < 5 ncrc-s
t,._' H ft..H From 0, 5 to 1 acae
r- I C I C- I From 0 1 to 5 a e
r J J J From 001 t,,<O 1 are
K
r' K K " 0 G1 a::,,0 "T LISSeSSfnent arVl S _,our -cut
12. Welland Intactness - WeVand type condition metric (evaluate for P000sms only)
Se AM I
F�, siri is We f,-,jl extent (! 90, ) of i!s rat,-,ra! lirids--ape
B n --s:,- is e -,� of t' u, ext -of its naturnP landscone sizc
P, — I - 90'. i ,-i n t
13 Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition nictric
13a Check appropriate i (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adJustmont. T."'is
e-wo'ualLs oil-fathor the wetiprid is vmll corinected andf,or C-cs'-'1V connected 1Lncsely) to the landscape ipatch Vhe curl�;,gucijs
rn'ura1y vegetated area and open valor (it 81-,�jndal ies am formied by four -lane roads, regiAarfy UL :,ty
hne comdors the width of a four line road or mdcr arbor, f, !ds open and o, water > 30-0 feetw:d,.
f- A A , 5,10 acres
C 8 From 100 to < 5i'M acres
C C" C From 50 to < 100 acres
6 D (" 0 From 10 to < 50 act es
f- E t; E < to acres
r, F r F VJeVand type rias a poor or no c-onric-ctur, to c!nw naturai
1
,1, Evatuale for marshes only
(- Yes r No VV band typo has a surface hydrok-.gy co In , c to C-pon vialers,stroar, or fidj! it;ellands
14, Edge Effect - wotiand type condition metric (skip for sit marshes)
May irivcfve a GIS effort votri field ad)usbmlent. Essrria!e distance from jrolland type boundary to art;ficial edges ArVic;al odges jrc�-,63
r,on-forested areas 1 40 feet YAIL such as felds, deve!,opmant, r,,)-,3di mqu!any m,3;n1ajnLd ut;!ty line corridors and :!Car-cuis
Cu"sider the eight main points of the com piss
is A No art:floial edge vv thin 150 feet in at djrccl:ors
f- B No aiMicial edgeivfthin 150 feet in four (4) to seven 17) dct;nns
r' C An artf;cml edge occurs within 150 feet in more than f0lj-(4) dircct:ons, 2f assoszmont area is clear-cut
15, Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference- cond,lior in spci:oes present and the P, npvllons lose. sira'a cc ""sed of appropnaio
species, iu!th exotic piants absent or sporss, I the asses sm, crit area
I- B Vegotaton is different from reference ( 'ordit,on m pec es dt�trsitj or propc;r,,,cns Lut st,.'l largely composed of rative Irciol-IS
charaotefof ;rex NLVai-id tyi:)e Tih i s may if', ck, de comm, ur", "es of viecd j nv L t ,pLcies triat develop after
dearrig It also includc.,, comrriun;busi,,, 'h exotcs present Let nct dLmri'ant, cvoi a larje, portcri of We expected Strata
C Vegel'u"ton severely altered fforn reference in con1posilon Expe-ted spec,;es 3 e unv-alajra=y abs n, (s!anled S!311da of roe,
&a,aclenstjc spec:es or a, least one stratum snapproptimL'yzomposed of a stglie sper=s) Exotc sper:,,e3 are dai-nInint in
at least one sna!tirn
15, Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Nci,-Adal Freshwater Marsh only)
C' A il
Vagea'; on di wcrs, ty is h, g i and is composed pr', anli y of r e- st e,; ,,s f x,s
G Vegztat:cn divers ,ty is fovv or Lias > 1 t-;) W a crexa*,,'s
C va�
-, at cil is dcrriinaled by excl, c spec;es

t7: Vegetative Structure - assessment arcalvmIand type condition metric
I 7.a Is ieg,>tat:cn presrnitll
i; Yes r" N'-) If Ytrs coni.nje to 171, V NrD skfp ti -1) I
1 1-u Eva.a'p percent cover37,_, _h' ass'essm-ri" aroa vegetmN­' for all inarshris only SK p tc 1 7_' hr rcr f7amn
C" A L 25",, ::cverage cf vegctwlori
ccvcraje r,,f vegalm,on
1 Check a box in each column for each stratum Eva'uate the P"On:cm. cf the c for ricn•rnarsh wetlands C
in a�
acr
.'
3b'._'ve "n12
- assossiment area U%A� and the neftind iyp,,, T) , ,p _ ,, iy
�e "IT
A
f A
Can,,,py c'csed or nen' rlv iv_.,.ir,atu­ 1 bit s c1 ':1 n1""!% Ti*al p
133
11
Cany but c" en"' m -re uhan ryural g'n�
t':
Canopyopspors3 or abscrt
A
aA
Dcne rid st-rp'sapl;ng layer
13
P
1 - 1 1
kladvate '=,sily mid sl�rylsap , g layer
r.- C
r;, C
hIld story a ling lay r span�o or absent
,a (" A ('r A Dense shrub layer
6W B 134 Moderate derS!ty shrat layer
ua C' C z C Shrub layer sparse or absent
(;' A A Derse here layer
1- 8 B "Oodcrate donsily herb :aye -
I -, C C 11'enb layer sparse ar acsont
18. Snags - wetland type condition metric
A
Largs snags (more Man coe, are visipl > 12 ncries DBH or arge ro!,31:ve to speces proseni and larrdrscape Slab;';y'
B Not A
19 Diameter Class Distribution - wetland typo condition metric
A Majicrity of carcipy trees have stems > 6 irches in diameter at breast h,.,3ghf (Val) miry Irge trees (> 12 inches OBH) are
present
B Ma;crity of canopy trees have stiorns bet.vecri 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12nch DPH
i- C ll`,13�0rsty of canopy trees are < 6 inches D5H or no trees
20, Large Woody Debris -wetland type condition metric
Include Orth natural debris and man -placed natural diabhs
,r' A Lange logs (more than on .°} are visible (> 12 inches in diamotcr, or!nrge relaIrve to spur e,.< piLscnt and landticape slalbl'ity!
r- B N o- t A
21. Vegatation,'Open Water Dispersion -wetland typetopen water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion beNeen vegetalt�n and operl'4all-Ir in the growing season Patterned
areas ind;--ate vegotated areas, while solid while; areas indicate. open water
C A B C 0
V
22 Hydrologic Connectivity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activilies that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intenskte
dilchirg, fiff, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams and strearn invsicri
A Overba nk pnd oveiland flaw are not severely aftered in the assessment area
r- B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area
C Overarld flaw is severely aftered in the assessment area
D Both overbank slaH, overland flow are severely altered in the assessment, arej,
Notes
Nearby s1marn is incisod resuft<rg in Imited opportunity for overnank flc,.-i undar ncinrrla! rames4 event

wCvvxMwmsmndRating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 41
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
YVm8�i
�ndtaNamm
Na, -no easmen\ Date 2/22/2016
WeVandTy»a Han:woodFomst /ssnsoo/NomoxJtqan|rodon J HortnudEG}
NomsunField AssessmontFonn(Ylfl) yES_~~
Presence of reQu|alorycnno/deraUonm<YJ4> /ES~~_~
Wetland isintensively managad(Y/N) NO
Assessment area ialocated within 5Qfeel. o/snatural tributary n,other openwa/or (Y/N) yES___�
Assessment area |msubsmm|a|lya|tanodbybeaver (Y/m) NO
�Assessment area experiences nverbonk/!oudin8during norma|/aix[a8cnn&dions(Y/N) NO—
Assessment area is on a coastal is!ar.d
O~___Aasessmen!a"eaisonaooas<$is/aud (Y/N) NO___|
Sub -function Rating Summary
rvletfts/Notes
Rating
Fun&,ion
Sub-furclicin
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Coo�dpn
LOV�__
Lom/
Sub-Surface Storage and Rmeu
Condition
LDVV
VVaterOua|hy
Pathogen Change
Condition
mVEDIUV�_
Comd/uon/Opportuni/y
MEDIUM_.
QpportunityPresence? (Y/N)
xO�__.
PonicubteCxansa
Condibon
LOW__.
Cond/unn/Opportumty
LOW___
Opportunity Presence? <Y/N>
NO___
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
CondiUon/Qpportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/m)
NO___
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM�_
CondUionx]pnortuoby
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO�___
Pollution Change
Condition
N*___
CondidanX}pponunity
NA
7 w
NA
Habitat
Pnys�ca|5*uctmre
Condihon
mOW___
Landscape Patch Structure
Cnnd*ion
MEDIUM__
vmnmusvomCmmpns|fion
Condition
LDVV
Function Rating Summary
Function
rvletfts/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
WaterQuaNy
Cond|h:n
LOW
CondibonK}pportvnuy
Lom/
Opportunity Presence? (v/m)
NO
Habitat
Co:dkin
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating - LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
MI.t.VI11PC3f11U� V9uf IYI QIIuQI VCIJ1V11 G. i
USACE AID #. SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe 2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: R. Turnbull - ESI
5. County: Wake 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Beaver Creek _
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach)- 35.75116, -78.87401
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
SE (sewer
9. Site number (show on attached map): easement) 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 20 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (I) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic EAS } El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ®Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
MB MB Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
MB Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in '`Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
El Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
MC No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes MNo Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses -5N
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
MB
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8 w
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation tC,
❑I Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) s o
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
MD
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
****—********—*****************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11, Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a,
MYes
[:]No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b.
Bedform
evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
MA
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
MB
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ M ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ M Sand (.062 —2 mm)
❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ®Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salama nders/tadpoles
❑ []Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>- 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated
buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
®B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following"stressors occurs on either bank, check'here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure

Stream Site Name Oak Pointe
Stream Category Pa3
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Date of Assessment 6/9/2016
Assessor Name/Organization R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM`et
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
;rt'
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW,_„'
(3) Stream Stability
LOWr
,
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
r , „�
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
i
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
3 Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
”
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGHi�
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
'I",
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
tat%; Fade
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
ns air 4U�� n
(3)Thermoregulation
HIGH
� �rSa � �
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
3 Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

f Mi.
INS-
2016/06109- 14.37
1

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar
5. County: Wake
7. River basin: Cape Fear
2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
R. Turnbull -
Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75455, -78.87107
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SE 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 20 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®AL / El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) []Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ®Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
El Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II []III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F1 Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. []Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses.
[IF 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) J2 E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8 w
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y t❑1
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) t o
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.
®Yes
❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
®B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water []Other:
12b. ®Yes []No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
❑ ®Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ []Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
HE Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22;
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment 6/9/2016
Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe 2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: R. Turnbull - ESI
5. County: Wake 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75588, -78.87270
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SLC 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): <1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑AL 1 ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water El Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I [:III ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes []No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, H
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) -g E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent g
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y tC,
I ❑I Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) _
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots "
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
****"***************************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*********"*****"**********
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la.
®Yes
❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
❑B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
®C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 —2 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
HE Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the fo_ Ilowing stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version
2.1
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment
6/9/2016
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization
R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

.t` w„•,. k i !i
•1 � . a k s r {
,
'�

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
r+�.a.v�u Nauw� voc, nw,�ua, vc�arvu �..,
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #. 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe 2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: R. Turnbull - ESI
5. County: Wake 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75705, -78.87153
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SPA 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 []Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes []No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A�
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (> 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? [:]Yes ®No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction -assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
®B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability -assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses R N
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ~ E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8 w
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation NC
❑I Sand bottom
®C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r „
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots "
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
***********************...****REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*****"*****"***************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.
®Yes
❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform
evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A F Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>— 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
El El ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ED FD Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E > 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment 6/9/2016
Stream Category Pbl Assessor Name/Organization R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
(1) Habitat
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
MEDIUM
HIGH

� ♦R
}3 ' #.t _.
y M
eY ,
bar w
OIL-

Appendix G
FEMA CLOMR Letter
Oak Pointe Property

Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, DC 20472 --
` North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
`t` Sv Cooperating Technical State �'�4 �•' �
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
The Honorable Lance Olive
Mayor, Town of Apex
P.O. Box 250
Apex, NC 27502
Dear Mayor Olive:
June 9, 2026
IN REPLY REFER TO:
Case No.:
Community Name:
Community No.:
16-04-1765R
Town of Apex, NC
370467
We are providing our comments with this enclosed Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) on a proposed
project within your community that, if constructed as proposed, could revise the effective Flood Insurance Study
report and Flood Insurance Rate Map for your community.
If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please contact the Floodplain Administrator for your community. If you
have any technical questions regarding this CLOMR, please contact the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program (NCFMP) at [phone], or the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map
Information eXchange (FMIX) toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1 -877 -FEMA MAP). Additional information about
the NFIP is available on FEMA's website at http://www.fenui.Eov/national-flood-instirance-prorrr-,rm, and
additional information about the NCFMP is available at http://www.nciloodmal2s,coi.
Sincerely,
Patrick "Rick" F. Sacbibit, P.E., Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
List of Enclosures:
Conditional Letter of Map Revision
John K. Dorman, Program Director
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
cc: Mr. Drew Havens, Manager, Town of Apex
Mr. Adam Stephenson, P.E., CFM, Engineering Supervisor, Town of Apex
The Honorable James West, Chairman, Board of Commissioners, Wake County
Mr. Jim Hartmann, County Manager, Wake County
Ms. Betsy Pearce, CFM, CPSWQ, Wake County
Mr. Kurt Burger, K. Hovnanian Homes
Mr. Joshua C. Allen, P.E., CFM, McAdams
Mr. Steve Garrett, CFM, LOMC Manager, NCFMP
Mr. John Gerber, P.E., State NFIP Coordinator, NCFMP

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 _ NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar
5. County: Wake
7. River basin: Cape Fear
2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
R. Turnbull -
Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75455, -78.87107
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SE 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 20 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15, NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic 0A� ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ®Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (> 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No if Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑i ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
[]Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
0 Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes [:]No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8 r
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Ell Sand bottom
EIC
N
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) CU
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots t'
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*********************—*****
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la.
®Yes
[]No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform
evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
®B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes [:]No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
121b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
❑ ®Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ®B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B R ❑B R From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E R R < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B El Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
!f none bf the following`stressors occurs on either bank, check`here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B n Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E > 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure.

Draft NC SAffi Stream Rating Sheet
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment 6/9/2016
Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM;i,
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
�t v
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
,
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Streamllntertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2)Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGHr�)??_
f
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
3 Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES'
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
2 Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGHtak,flt,3FJr:°.
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH`,r't`
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH,'f'
t�z
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NAs,
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
iarF(
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM.�

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any):
Oak Pointe
3. Applicant/owner name:
Lennar
5. County:
Wake
7. River basin:
Cape Fear
2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
4. Assessor name/organization:
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5 -minute quad:
R. Turnbull - ESI
Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75588, -78.87270
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SLC 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50
11, Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): <1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A` ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (> 5 mi)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑Il ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? []Yes ®No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
MB MB Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
MB Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
MC No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes MNo Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses.
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � E
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
MB
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent 8
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y LC,
❑I Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots 2
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and
Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la.
MYes
[]No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform
evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
MC
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
In riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑ M ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ M Sand (.062 —2 mm)
❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
M
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
MYes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
El n Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>! 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E n ❑E n < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the follorivng stressors occurs on either bank, check'here and skip to Metric -22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B R Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B R Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity —assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version
2.1
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment
6/9/2016
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization
R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

.t` w„•,. k i !i
•1 � . a k s r {
,
'�

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Ccs. a.V��i NC1111cJ v�c� ts,o��ua+ wc���v�� e. �
USACE AID #: SAW -2016-00095 NCDWR #: 16-0285
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Oak Pointe 2. Date of evaluation: 6/9/2016
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: R. Turnbull - ESI
5. County: Wake 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Cape Fear on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Beaver Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.75705, -78.87153
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SPA 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mit) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mit) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mit) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mit)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑LAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction -assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile -assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
®B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability -assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
F1 ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b.
Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses W h
n 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) iq E
[:JG Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o a
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetationN
❑I Sand bottom
®C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) Za
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots " g
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.
®Yes
❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b.
Bedform
evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A
Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
®B
Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
❑C
Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c.
in riffle
sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R C A P
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 —4096 mm)
®
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d.
®Yes
❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes []No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/a mph ipod/crayfish/shri mp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
® ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver darn, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
El Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break,
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A ? 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check;here and skip to Metric 22.IZ
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E > 230
Notes/Sketch:
See attached figure.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Oak Pointe Date of Assessment 6/9/2016 _
Stream Category Pbl Assessor Name/Organization R. Turnbull - ESI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (YIN) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
(1) Habitat
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
MEDIUM
HIGH

� ♦R
}3 ' #.t _.
y M
eY ,
bar w
OIL-

Appendix G
FEMA CLOMR Letter
Oak Pointe Property

Federal Emergency Management Agency
>,
r Washington, DC 204724 • a-
` North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
Cooperating Technical State
June 9, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED IN REPLY REFER TO:
The Honorable Lance Olive Case No.: 16-04-1765R
Mayor, Town of Apex Community Name: Town of Apex, NC
P.O. Box 250 Community No.: 370467
Apex, NC 27502
Dear Mayor Olive:
We are providing our comments with this enclosed Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) on a proposed
project within your community that, if constructed as proposed, could revise the effective Flood Insurance Study
report and Flood Insurance Rate Map for your community.
If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please contact the Floodplain Administrator for your community. If you
have any technical questions regarding this CLOMR, please contact the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping
Program (NCFMP) at [phone], or the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map
Information eXchange (FMIX) toll free at 1-877-336-2627 (1 -877 -FEMA MAP). Additional information about
the NFIP is available on FEMA's website at httlr //yv%vyy fenra.1-'ovIri�ition rl-flood-ittstrrar�ce-iiroii-am, and
additional information about the NCFMP is available at ood111, cpm.
Sincerely,
Patrick "Rick" F. Sacbibit, P.E., Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
List of Enclosures;
Conditional Letter of Map Revision
John K. Dorman, Program Director
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
cc: Mr. Drew Havens, Manager, Town of Apex
Mr. Adam Stephenson, P.E., CFM, Engineering Supervisor, Town of Apex
The Honorable James West, Chairman, Board of Commissioners, Wake County
Mr. Jim Ilartmann, County Manager, Wake County
Ms. Betsy Pearce, CFM, CPSWQ, Wake County
Mr, Kurt Burger, K. Hovnanian Homes
Mr. Joshua C. Allen, P.E., CFM, McAdams
Mr. Steve Garrett, CFM, LOMC Manager, NCFMP
Mr. John Gerber, P.E., State NFIP Coordinator, NCFMP

Page 1 of 6
Issue Date: June 9, 2016
Case No.: 16-04-17658
CLOMR-APP
Federal Emergency Management agency
Mfr `tip Washington, D,C. 20472
'1`13 sFt
CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION
COMMENT DOCUMENT
COMMUNITY INFORMATION PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS OF CONDITIONAL REQUEST
Town of Apex CULVERT HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Wake County FLOODWAY
North Carolina UPDATED TOPOGRAPHIC DATA
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY NO.: 370467
NC-16-496 — Proposed Oak Pointe Culvert at Beaver Creek APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE: 35 755,-76.872
IDENTIFIER SOURCE: FIRM DATUM: NAD 83
AFFECTED MAP PANELS
TYPE: FIRM' NO.: 3720073200J DATE: 5/2/2006 FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
TYPE. FIRM, NO,: 3720073300J DATE 5/2/2006
FLOODING SOURCES) AND REACH DESCRIPTION See Page 2 for Additional Flooding Sources
Beaver Creek (Basin 27, Stream 2) — from a point approximately 630 feet upstream of Highway 55/W, Williams Street to a point just upstream of Old Jenks Road,
PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Flooding Source Proposed Project Location of Proposed Project
Beaver Creek (Basin 27, Stream 2) New (50'x 8') Bottomless Culvert at a point approximately 1,800 feet downstream of Old Jenks Road,
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS TO FLOOD HAZARD DATA
Flooding Source Effective Flooding Proposed Flooding Increases Decreases
Beaver Creek (Basin 27, Stream 2) BFEs` BFEs Yes Yes
Zone AE Zone AE Yes Yes
Floodway Floodway Yes Yes
Zone X (shaded) Zone X (shaded) Yes Yes
BFEs - Base (1-percent-annual-chance) Flood Elevations
COMMENT
This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) comment regarding a request for a CLOMR for the project described above This
document is not a final determination; it only provides our comment on the proposed project in relation to the flood hazard information shown on the effective
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. We reviewed the submitted data and the data used to prepare the effective flood hazard information for your
community and determined that the proposed project meets the minimum floodplain management criteria of tite NFIP. Your community is responsible for approving
all floodplain development and for ensuring that all permits required by Federal or State/Commonwealth law have been received State/Commonwealth, county,
and community officials, based on their knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction in the Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA), the area subject to inundation by the base flood). If the State/Commonwealth, county, or community has adopted more restrictive or
comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP criteria.
This comment is based on the flood data presently available. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) toll
free at 1-877-336-2627 (1-877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMC Clearinghouse, 847 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304-4605, Additional Information
about the NFIP is available on the FEMA website at http://www fema.gov�/national-flood-insurance-program
Patrick 'Rick' F. Sacbibit, P.E , Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal insurance and Mitigation Administration 16-04-1765R 104

Page 2 of 6 Issue Date; June 9, 2016 Case No.; 16-04-1765R CLOMR-APP
M- Federal Emergency Management Agency
4 Washington, D.C.20472
CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION
COMMENT DOCUMENT (CONTINUED)
OTHER COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY THIS CONDITIONAL REQUEST
CID Number: 370368 Name: Wake County, North Carolina
AFFECTED MAP PANELS
TYPE FIRM' NO,: 3720073200J DATE 5/2/2006
TYPE: FIRM' NO.: 3720073300J PATE: 5!2!2006
This comment is based on the flood data presently available. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) toll
free at 1-877-336-2627 (1 -877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMC Clearinghouse, 847 South Pickett Street, Nexandria, VA 22304-4605. Additional Information
about the NFIP is available on the FEMA website at http://wviw.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program,
Patrick "Rick' F. Sacbibit, P E, Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
16-04-17658 104

Page 3 of 6 Issue Date: June 9, 2016 Case No.. 16-04-17658 CLOMR-APP
It'f',1F,r,-
' v
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
tf_1 u ti�s��w
CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION
COMMENT DOCUMENT (CONTINUED)
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
To determine the change~ in flood hazard~ that will be caused by the proposed project, we compared the hydraulic modeling reflecting the proposed project
(referred to as the proposed condition,, model) to the hydraulic modeling used to prepare the Flood Insurance Study (FCS) (referred to as the effective
model). If the effective model does not provide enough detail to evaluate the effects of the proposed project, an existing conditions model must be
developed to provide this detail. This existing conditions model is then compared to the effective model and the proposed conditions model to differentiate
the increases or decreases in flood hazards caused by more detailed modeling from the increases or decreases in flood hazards that will be caused by the
proposed project.
The table below .shows the changes in the BFEs:
BEE Comparison Table
Flooding Source: Beaver Creek (Basin BEE Change (feet) Location of maximum change
27, Stream 2)
Existing vs. Maximum increase 0.4 at a point approximately 1,200 feet downstream of Old Jenks Road.
Effective IMaximum decrease 0.9 at a point approximately 1,470 feet downstream of Oki Jenks Road.
Proposed vs. Maximum increase 0.9 at a point approximately 1,740 feet downstream of Old Jenks Road.
Existing Maximum decrease 0.5 lat a point approximately 1,200 feet downstream of Old Jenks Road
Proposed vs. Maximum increase 0-4 ai a point approximately 800 feet downstream of Oki Jenks Road,
Effective Maximum decrease 0.2 at a point approximately 1,870 feet downstream of Old Jenks Road.
Increases due to the proposed project that exceed those permitted under Paragraphs (c)(10) or (d)(3) of Section 60.3 of the NFIP regulations must adhere to
Section 65.12 of the NFIP regulations. With this request, your community has complied with all requirements of Paragraph 65.12(a) of the NFIP
regulations. Compliance with Paragraph 65.12(b) also is necessary before FEMA can iN.sue a Letter of Ntap Revision when a community proposes to
permit encroachments into the effective floodplain/regulatory floodway that will cause BFE increases in excess of those permitted under Paragraph
603(d)(3)/60.3(c)(10).
NFIP regulation, Subparagraph 60.3(6)(7) require,, communities to ensure that the flood-canying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any
watercourse is maintained. This provision is incorporated into your community's existing floodplain management ordinances; therefore, responsibility For
maintenance of the altered or relocated watercourse, including any related appurtenances such as bridges, culverts, and other drainage structures, rents with
your community, We may request that your community submit a description and schedule of maintenance activities necessary to ensure this requirement.
U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recommendations dated December 11, 2015 must be followed.
This comment is based on the flood data presently available. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Information exchange (FMIX) toll
free a1 1-877-336-2627 (1 -877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMC Clearinghouse, 847 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304-4605, Additional Information
about the NFIP is available on the FEMA website at http://www.fema.gov/nationa!-flood-insurance-program.
Patrick "Rick' F. Sacbibit, P.E., Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
16-04-1765R 104

Page 4 of 6 tissue Date: June 9, 2016 ICase No.: 16-04-176SR
_ Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
ITS
DATA REQUIRED FOR FOLLOW-UP LONIR
CLOMR-APP
Upon completion of the project, your community must submit the data listed below and request that we make a final determination on
revising the effective FIRM and FIS report_ If the project is built as proposed and the data below are received, a revision to the FIRM and
FIS report would be warranted.
Detailed application and certification forms must be used for requesting final revisions to the maps. Therefore, when the reap revision
request for the area covered by this letter is submitted, Form 1, entitled "Overview and Concurrence Form," must be included. A copy of
this form may be accessed at htip://www.fema.gov/plan/preverit/fhm/dl_mt-2.shtm.
• The detailed application and certification forms listed below may be required if as -built conditions differ from the proposed plans. If
required, please submit new forms, which may be accessed at http://www.fema.gov/plan/pieveiiUfhnVdl_int-2.shtm, or annotated copies of
the previously submitted forms showing the revised information.
Form 2, entitled "Riverine Hydrology and Hydraulics Form." Hydraulic analyses for as -built conditions of the base flood , the 10 -
percent, 2 -percent, and 0.2 percent annual chance floods, and the regulatory floodway, must be submitted with Form 2.
Form 3, entitled "Riverine Structures Form."
• A certified topographic work map showing the revised and effective base and 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain and floodway
boundaries. Please ensure that the revised information ties in with the current effective information at the downstream and upstream ends
of the revised reach.
• An annotated copy of the FIRM; at the scale of the effective FIRM, that shows the revised base and 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain
and floodway boundary delineations shown on the submitted work map and how they tie into the base and 0.2 percent annual chance
floodplain and floodway boundary delineations shown on the current effective FIRM at the downstream and upstream ends of the revised
reach.
As -built plans, certified by a registered Professional Engineer, of all proposed project elements.
• A copy of the public notice distributed by your community stating its intent to revise the regulatory floodway, or a signed statement by
your community that it has notified all affected property owners and affected adjacent jurisdictions.
• Documentation of the individual legal notices sent to property owners who will be affected by any widening or shifting of the base
floodplain and/or any BFE increases along Beaver Creek (Basin 27, Stream 2).
r
Patrick "Rick" F. Sacbibit, P E., Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mrigation Administration
16-04-17658

Page 5 of 6 Ilssue Date: June 9, 2016 ICase No.: 16-04-17658
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
1tla �vt
•' ' ` • 1ULU
• i
DATA REQUIRED FOR FOLLOW-UP LOMR (continued)
CLOMR-APP
• FEMA's fee schedule for reviewing and processing requests for conditional and final modifications to published flood information and
reaps may be accessed at https://www.feina,gov/forms-documents-and-software/flood-map-related-fees. "The fee at the time of the map
revision submittal must be received before we can begin processing the request. Payment of this fee can be made through a check or
money order, made payable in U.S. funds to the National Flood Insurance Program, or by credit card (Visa or MasterCard only). Please
either forward the payment, along with the revision application, to the following address:
North Carolina MT -2 LOMC Depot
Attention: Steve Garrett
4218 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4218
or submit the LOMR using the Online LOMC portal at: https://hazards.ferna.gov/femaportal/oillinelome/sigr)in
After receiving appropriate documentation to show that the project has been completed, FEMA will initiate a revision to the FIRM, and
FIS report. Because the flood hazard information (i.e., base flood elevations, base flood depths, SFHAs, zone designations, and/or
regulatory floodways) will change as a result of the project, a 90 -day appeal period will be initiated for the revision, during which
community officials and interested persons may appeal the revised flood hazard information based on scientific or technical data.
comment is based on the flood data presently available. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Information eXchange (FMIX) toll
at 1-877-336-2627 (1 -677 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMC Clearinghouse, 847 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304-4605, Additional Information
it the NFIP is available on the FEMA website at http:L/www.ferna.gov/national-flood-insurance-program.
Patrick "Rick' F. Sacbibit, P.E., Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration 16-04-1765R

Page 6 of 6 Ilssue Date: June 9, 2016 lCase No.: 16-04-17658
G
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Washington, D.C. 20472
c,
t,tif o `-
COMMUNITY REMINDERS
CLOMR-APP
We have designated a Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) to assist your community. The CCO will be the primary liaison between
your community and FF''N1A. For information regarding you CCC, please contact:
Mr. Jesse Munoz
Director, Mitigation Division
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IV
Koger Center - Rutgers Building, 3003 Chamblee Tucker Road
Atlanta, GA 30341
[phone]
A preliminary study is being conducted for Town of Apex and Wake County. Preliminary copies of the revised FIRM and FTS report
were submitted to your community for review on March 31, 2015, and may become effective before the revision request following this
CLOMR is submitted. Please ensure that the data submitted for the revision ties into the data effective at the time of the submittal.
s comment is based on the flood data presently available. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Information eXchange (r""MIX)
free at 1-877-336-2627 (1 -877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the LOMC Clearinghouse, 847 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304-4605. Additional
,rmation about the NFIP is available on the FEMA website at http://www,fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program.
Patrick "nick' F Sacbibit, P E , Branch Chief
Engineering Services Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitfgaiion Administration 16-04-1765R

Appendix H
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SEQUENCES
Oak Pointe Property

i
vANIABtE x10m rowN
of nPEX Pueuc unutt �
EASEMENT (t W.)
SS 0/F -C-
(SEE SHEEP P-6)
8"xe'
8• SS
VAW,DLE VAOnI PWVAIE
STOW DRAINAGE EASEMENT
(TW.)
20' TD'MI OF APEX)
EASE. STORM
aeaNACE
_EASE_=ENT
69 I
--111 fill T 1W
Tin
c �
--v_ .• _
11
II
m SIN/I ���� l:;'�l►� r � v
1
:1
9+50 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 15+50
NOTE:
PIPES AT ENDWALI6 EW -606 AND EW -500 SHALL PENETRATE AND
FINISH FLDSH NAiH n WiNOW'At1S OF THE BOTTOMLESS BOX WLVERT.
EW -500
CB 501
STA 1310643
CB 603
STA 11+4442
-SSS
STA 12+31.75
INV=JJ6.00
T/C 345 64
T/0=348.35
T/-= 660
C8 -500A
9N OUT -N '64
'NV IN=334.96 (M-602) INJ IN 334.25 (CB -604)
NV DDT --NV OMI 334.15
57A 1-9.24
CB--
' MAG
T/C=345.64
INV IN=340.35 (CB
STA 10+43.96
-501) T/035036
CB-�
STA 11+4443
EW-60fi
INV�334.00
NJ OMT=336.95
1NV IN=33559 (JB -601)
T/C=346.35
Dvte
CM—Building Inspections
INV OMT=335 49
INV Ot-4. 6J
-603)
GRAPHIC SCALE
eo
1 inch = 40 ft
SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL PROJECT,
SITE, GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY NOTES
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
TOWN OF APEX ENGINEERING DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
Ths signatures affixed 5 w certify that this sheet
eon
has been r wean
d d approved solely per
the certifications signed the
ee
cover sht of
these co-i—ti- plans.
— KHH-15000
PLAN & PROFILE
POINTE CROSSING, STA 9+50THRUSTA 15+50
®�� ����
PHASE 2e �i®NwrITRUCiITON I�RAWIIviIs
APEX NOIZCHCAROIAVA
Pubiic Works— Env. Proq,—
Date
CM—Engineering
Deie
_
' MAG
Gate
CM—?ransportviion
Dcte
Planning
04-01-2016
Dvte
CM—Building Inspections
Dete
Planning—Tronepvrtction
Public Works—Water/Sewer
Cote
Date
Fire
Public Works—Ele<tric
Date
Date
Parks, R—cation & CIIISLY l Res.
Public Works—S&E
Data
G — RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS:
OWNER/DEVLOPER:•.••"•"""••„
K. IIOVNANIAN HOMES OF NC
3333 REGENCY PARKWAY
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: TOMMY MORGAN
Q S
cA D mm`'
173E JOHN RMeADAMS
COMPANY, INC'
2905 Meridian Park—y
1Tuham,North Cazvllua27713
License No.: C-0293
(8001733-56461McAdaroaco.00m
;S�SN CARO/ .,
' =o`�SS&po
ss
i NEF'?i
--,tige •- P '"
— KHH-15000
PLAN & PROFILE
POINTE CROSSING, STA 9+50THRUSTA 15+50
®�� ����
PHASE 2e �i®NwrITRUCiITON I�RAWIIviIs
APEX NOIZCHCAROIAVA
�..
KHH15000–PH2–P7
DP
_
' MAG
W=. -ems. = do'
s " = 4'
04-01-2016
6� Na. P-1
IW1 MCADAMS

s
POINTE GROVE LANE CB -11141+165
0,A
FRE H.' T STA 14+55.70 STA 16+58.75
ASSEMBLY {rYP.) T/Cm -7,
50 PUBLIC R ) N N-317.}0 {ce-113) GiN3so oo (ce-1 n)
\ ) INV Ik=348.59 CB -101
INV OUr=341.20 CB -117
24 t9 � I I I SEE SHEET P-1 \ � j ( ) INV OUT=349.90
-- /) I I 1 1 I I Y 5rA 16+s9.os
�. ti
CULVERT 7 I I - i i 1 1 I BE iA+r6.9a 1. ot�ir 1.4.26
co (SEE SHEET C-12) /./ `\� 1 I) I ®CD
No \\ _ 8 1 SWBAR sEWER \/ N IN=111.05 (CB -tot)
25 I I 3 1 20' JORDAN LANE I ( SERVICE W CtF _ ` / !'(� ]� / INV OUf=5398.95CB-119) CB"tt6
SrA 15114.89
18 (TYP.) 37 R \
U I I O - zGNE 2 ButTTn I j� 1 r/c-3sass
11\ - ( CB -1031 (1)B� &B �isTANCE T�RiANC. o s/ERAC0.EEDE J/a'� z� / INV Dur=3a9.ss
® \ Y'r 12 (1) 6'x6' REDUCER (ny.) I } '_ M.) 64r 1 VA 1f3+83.62 Gy-BrA tiz+6i.n
EA1 T �/ 30' JORDAN UKE SSIAV 103 (I) 6• -8 n
_ RED POINTE �1VE ' REi INIAC w u ZONE 1 B ER a' D4) 2a F 15, 0 -RING RCP CB -1i8 / T/C=356.45 T/C=359.11
- (ill ( (�JU' PUBLIC R N¢) / r5 (DE•$ICN BY {Typ) 1 P0� INTF O 1.OSR INV IN=35010 (CB -103) INV IN=}53.85 (CB 122)
Q O ca l y IO , OTHERS) - m \ SSkH 102 42 LF 15• RCP O 1.02X i }'ft 22.Y BEND INV IN -35410 (CB -120)
M7 rn I \ / F 04 32 Lf 18' RCP \ {5• pip) O I.O1X 73 IS 15%RCP i / INJ OtR=348.50
ISEE SHEET_ P_- )I / _ _ 5o R/w _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - / W OU1e353J5
_ � _ O 13BR
--
a 2H'R CB -121 I CB -122 36 LF 24' RCP 8-102 2H'R CB-tl} CB -120
-51,11 STA
8' E
rt O 126X CB 11B CB -114 /� T INV IN 347.92 (C8-114) T/C IN=35J96 (CB -121)
(z) 6• cues - e- w/L f1,00 \ ' 5H -z is+bb c 115 - INv our=3a>.9z INV our -351.85
16I. SSMN t10 '
_____._...1 _ 2a lF 15• RCPT _ _ __ 4 DU.)
25 LF 1S' 1 m I se0 s3' _I --__ .. 8. i - CB -ti ( / _
CB -101A 25 Lf IS• RCP CB-itd ST.
t nniurF oRNF - SA 11+23.60
28 CB -120 C6-119 CB -101 R=zoo po' / SBMN 109 SNA 15+57.29 T C M-35
CB-tt3 SSMH 108 L-159,�/ (4' DIy) - =_ E% Z ":--�' /C=354.40 /
OUTm358.20
I { p� _ INV IN 34880 (CB -i15)
-- --- - __ IN -349. 12 1 _
CONCR�IE 4' 0 -RING RCP\ ZS lF 24 0 RING RCP _ I INV OtR348.O5CB 22
STA 112+61.62
1 136 LF ,s RCP os3X T/c=359.11
CS -118)
51EEAA O 2J1X IN OUT -354.11
27 ( (TYP.) f ( Is5 tE 1s• RCP- SS O/F "B" -� - STA is+81.01
O 1.71X ( _ EX 3p' TOWN OF T/ 115
I t7--\\\] RETAIN NG WALL y, (SEE SHEET P-5) I FUTURE 10 h /` i� EASEMENBLIC UTIJTY TQC iN54.45
34915 (CB -116)
i \ (DES GN BY OTHERS) ( IXtEE WAY TRAIL'
i RETAIN.NG WALL M2 I l - S 00 ..AIN INV OUr=,349.05
- - .- 10'x70' Sc r 1(DESmN'er oTHERs) \ \\ �� STORMWATER ER100
DISTANCE TRANGLE \
lg (TYP.) MANAGEMENT FACILITY "A" / JB tooA 1 F _ _ 1
\ - --------�I ` ` \\ �'�(SEE "SW" SHEETS),/Ex. ssMH
P Ou DM -
j
RI Es (r 16
UTIIJTY / GREENWAY EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE
0
® 1 inch = 40 ft l
�e
9+50 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
NOTE:
INSTALL A CONCRETE CRAOk£ IF MINIMUM CLEARANCES AT WATER ,EEM R
AND STORM DRAINAGE CROSSINGS IS NOT PROVIDED.
SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL PROJECT,
SITE, GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY NOTES
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
TOWN OF APEX ENGINEERING DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
The sig,t- orh.ed below Ce rtlfy thot this s set nes been re weoo
d d approved solely Per
the certilicotions signed on the
cover sM1eet
of these cons,ructione plans.
,.•""'•.
qN CARo ''•.,
} _
SEAL'•. =
= ; 22286 ' A, `
=;`•:F e•%
P
CM -Engineering
Cate
Public Works-Env.-regrons
Date
CM-Transportction
Data
BY. DP
D.I.
Planning
CM -Building Inspections
Date
DM
Plonning-Transportaiion
01-05-2016
Date
Public Works-Woter/Sewer
Dale
Fire
Public Works -Electro
Dete
Date
Parks, Recreation & Cul -I Res.
Pu k Works-S&E
Date
DRAWING - RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
REVISIONS:
OWNER/DEVLOPER:
K. HOVNANIAN HOMES
3333 REGENCY PARKWAY
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: TOMMY MORGAN
"
MCADAMS6P
TIE JOHN R MCADAMS
�� INC
2905 M.Idi-Parkmy
DurLam. North Carolina 27713
[Aceuae No.: C-0293
(800) 71-11, MI -1-1
,.•""'•.
qN CARo ''•.,
} _
SEAL'•. =
= ; 22286 ' A, `
=;`•:F e•%
P
Na KH-15000
PLAN &PROFILE
RED POINTE DRIVE STA. 9+50 THRIJ STA. 18+00
® P®INTE
y��� (� �7/� ry� DRAWINGS
PHASE 1 CON TR V CI i ®N DRt'1YV 1NGS
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA
Q.
BY. DP
X B*- MAG
B 2. sc 1" = 40'
6p 1" = 4'
01-05-2016
Na. P-2
")
tJI MCADAMS

I
39 I
I1
\l
4' SWRARY SEWER �\
SEfMCE WfM CLEWOUiS \
I
40ssuH 203
W D6\)
e'.e' rcE
(t) e' rxare
8' GV&B
8'x8' REDUCERS ! (
PROPOSED FLOOD PI -NN
(PER CL.A --
POINTE CROSSING
(50' PUBLIC R/W)
(SEE SHEET P-4)
�\ 37
\ 30' sTANOARo cuae
) ND GUTTER (nr.)
20` JORDAN
36 ZONE 2 BUFl
I VARIABLEw1D, PUBLICP )
STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
10+00 DO YE11.OY1 OAK OF
15+6134 PoIN1E CROSSING
43 LF 15' RCP SSM
-<]'� Ir 15 RCP _ _ (50' PUB
O 0.53&
l VARIABLE MOOD Pusuc RETAINI
w/E STORM DRAINAGE EASEMFR'T #4 (BY
`
P-OSED .
PROPOSED FL000 l W
(PER mo.,,SUBMITIID
10/12/2015)
30' JOROAN tAKE
ZONE 1 BUFFER
(TMPa
\ L 35 ♦
V ( 1 SSMH 204 1♦ �✓'
C6-218
1
A.8 lF 24'
RETAINI� A. \ o O50z
" (I THcT2 T )
GRAPHIC SCALE
+o zo 4o eo
1 inch = a0 ft.
YELLOW POINTE COURT -ld'I
(504 PUBLIC R/W) A.I
W (SEE SHEET P-4)
W
34 / P.I. sin. 16+49.3] ow ouc DRIVE - I �f
to+Do.00 rEuoW rol 66 cou T I I Zg 27 1
32 20` PUBLIC STORM I 1
- 85 30' ftCP pRAINAGE E45FlAENi
A� n o.fitz 4• _ffAR+ sm.
CB -202 SEANCE wRH 1 133 LF 15' RCP W
-4q
\ �.� ClfAN0U15 SSMH 207 I \ I In 2441E 24' RCP 25 LF 15' RCP SSMH Z.
��1/'� o 413x •RCP 1_(6' Dw�/ \ n asst _ o T.ozz -' (cep-za> '
Cl -2 E(�
1
K O O -"R RCP CB -201
SS H 2 8W TE£ CB -205 ,
\' =-D0.) 27' B-6 6 GV&eDRIVE
�NE
Y.,HN/y,''TT �3aU`24'RCP- so`R/W -i sNA 14 --- I DRIVEI� /i --j d'
` i.A1JL0W A u oo.- �-2. 3/4' OOMESIIG 1 10+00 00 REO PDINI E "Al"O; • b• TEE 77]
\ / / 0 >•d1t
DRIVE
wnTER sERYICE 1 (z) 6' cveel
/ 120 l 24' RCP }0" STANDARD CURD
SWMF B/ (50' PUBLIC IR�I �H s/a' M ER i n o.5az i
AND G -ER (m> W
(SEE SW SHEETS) 13 , 76 I 17 II 18 Z
20` PDeuc STORM I 14)15 I O ; .•a
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
RED POINTE DRIVE h
(50' PUBLIC R/W)
(SEE SHEET P-2)"
1
1
-201 CB -215
STA 14+]0.89 SrA 19+31.]0
NV 1.86
INV -3695 (CB -202) I- oa9=.3464
.44
OUTaJ3B.85
CB -202 STA 13+79.37
M 14+70.71 T/C=350.56
T/C=351.es ItN INm339.>3 (CB -217)
NV
INV IN=346.10 (CB -203j INV IN=340.88 (CB -225)
N=339.as (ca-ztfi) INv aur=335.63
IMI OUT�339.Da
8-21]
CB -203 STA 12+56.60
S!A 15+53.80
T/C=355.55
T/Ca**52.32
INV IN=344.00 (s"")
INV IN=349.50 (CB -204)
INV IN=34].OJ (Ca -224)
INV OUr=349.40
INV OUT=340.32
CB-204CB-218
��� Ilii �E
PHASE I CONSTRUCITON DRAWINGS
APEX NORTH CAROLINA
- 15+78.19
T/C=356.77
STA 10+46.36
T/Cm353,21
,W IN=349.]9 (C8 -2D5)
INV OUi-349.69
INV N=345.1] (1:221
I
INV N=345.55 (C6 -21B)
/•
INV OUT=345.07
STA 16+98.23
T/C=362.83
CB -221
INv IN=350.59 (CB -206)
INV OUT=350.49
�
Cfi-206
INV IN=315.45.55 (C0-222)
INV OIlT=34530
STA 16+98.22
T/C=362.83
-IIT 5�j6
551M 2C�f"
M 12
STA 12+56.35
(CB -20])
INV OOT -0,72
T/C=352.32
INV OUT -347
/25 lF 15' RCP '� ♦ (�
DWI
SU 18+31.69
T/C=369.44
T/D=350.58
INV OUr=341.13
I
224 / _-- O 1.022
,./ CB -225 ♦�
R
-19.
)
Pablic Works-S&E
J
` I ) 24 lF 15' RCP ♦�
1.ozzi1. '� `�%A
/CULVEkT'
#2 STORMWATER
FACILITY "B'
MANAGEMENT
EE SFj6Efi C-12) ; (SEE
-SW- SHEETS)
\\
`BMP MAINIPTIANOE AND
ACCESS EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE
+o zo 4o eo
1 inch = a0 ft.
YELLOW POINTE COURT -ld'I
(504 PUBLIC R/W) A.I
W (SEE SHEET P-4)
W
34 / P.I. sin. 16+49.3] ow ouc DRIVE - I �f
to+Do.00 rEuoW rol 66 cou T I I Zg 27 1
32 20` PUBLIC STORM I 1
- 85 30' ftCP pRAINAGE E45FlAENi
A� n o.fitz 4• _ffAR+ sm.
CB -202 SEANCE wRH 1 133 LF 15' RCP W
-4q
\ �.� ClfAN0U15 SSMH 207 I \ I In 2441E 24' RCP 25 LF 15' RCP SSMH Z.
��1/'� o 413x •RCP 1_(6' Dw�/ \ n asst _ o T.ozz -' (cep-za> '
Cl -2 E(�
1
K O O -"R RCP CB -201
SS H 2 8W TE£ CB -205 ,
\' =-D0.) 27' B-6 6 GV&eDRIVE
�NE
Y.,HN/y,''TT �3aU`24'RCP- so`R/W -i sNA 14 --- I DRIVEI� /i --j d'
` i.A1JL0W A u oo.- �-2. 3/4' OOMESIIG 1 10+00 00 REO PDINI E "Al"O; • b• TEE 77]
\ / / 0 >•d1t
DRIVE
wnTER sERYICE 1 (z) 6' cveel
/ 120 l 24' RCP }0" STANDARD CURD
SWMF B/ (50' PUBLIC IR�I �H s/a' M ER i n o.5az i
AND G -ER (m> W
(SEE SW SHEETS) 13 , 76 I 17 II 18 Z
20` PDeuc STORM I 14)15 I O ; .•a
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
RED POINTE DRIVE h
(50' PUBLIC R/W)
(SEE SHEET P-2)"
1
1
-201 CB -215
STA 14+]0.89 SrA 19+31.]0
NV 1.86
INV -3695 (CB -202) I- oa9=.3464
.44
OUTaJ3B.85
CB -202 STA 13+79.37
M 14+70.71 T/C=350.56
T/C=351.es ItN INm339.>3 (CB -217)
NV
INV IN=346.10 (CB -203j INV IN=340.88 (CB -225)
N=339.as (ca-ztfi) INv aur=335.63
IMI OUT�339.Da
8-21]
CB -203 STA 12+56.60
S!A 15+53.80
T/C=355.55
T/Ca**52.32
INV IN=344.00 (s"")
INV IN=349.50 (CB -204)
INV IN=34].OJ (Ca -224)
INV OUr=349.40
INV OUT=340.32
CB-204CB-218
��� Ilii �E
PHASE I CONSTRUCITON DRAWINGS
APEX NORTH CAROLINA
- 15+78.19
T/C=356.77
STA 10+46.36
T/Cm353,21
,W IN=349.]9 (C8 -2D5)
INV OUi-349.69
INV N=345.1] (1:221
I
INV N=345.55 (C6 -21B)
CB -205
INV OUT=345.07
STA 16+98.23
T/C=362.83
CB -221
INv IN=350.59 (CB -206)
INV OUT=350.49
STA
T/C= 353.21
Cfi-206
INV IN=315.45.55 (C0-222)
INV OIlT=34530
STA 16+98.22
T/C=362.83
Planning-Transporteiion
INV IN -351.4] (C9-212)
M 12
STA 12+56.35
(CB -20])
INV OOT -0,72
T/C=352.32
INV OUT -347
C6-207
a-z2s
STA 13+79.41
SU 18+31.69
T/C=369.44
T/D=350.58
INV OUr=341.13
I. IN=364.19 (CB -215)
Public ft,ks-Electric
INV IN=364.40 (CB -206)
NV OUT=3 -
Recreation & Cultural Res.
SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL PROJECT,
SITE, GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY NOTES
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
TOWN OF APD( ENGINEERING DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
Thes1Gnotures offixed blow c-fy
th°t th's sheet h° b wed nd opp--d y per
the certifications signed on the cover sheet of
these construction plans.
..""""""•„
N cARo ,
? oe ; •E� •.,
ll Lam';\J`_
o
22286
=�`+. e..
= p •:NGL NES`
(Y
CM -Engineering
Date
��� Ilii �E
PHASE I CONSTRUCITON DRAWINGS
APEX NORTH CAROLINA
Date
Public Works -Env. Programs
CM-iranspo!tation
DP
Dete
Date
Planning
CM -Building Inspections
" = a'
Date
D°te
Planning-Transporteiion
Public Works-Wafer/Sewer
Date
Dote
Frre
Dc[e
Public ft,ks-Electric
DatePerks•
Recreation & Cultural Res.
Pablic Works-S&E
Date
9+50 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 18+50 J
FINAL DRAWING - RI.LL'ASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
/ REVISIONS:
`
OWNER/DEVLOPER:
K. HOVNANIAN HOMES
3333 REGENCY PARKWAY
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: TOMMY MORGAN
cA Ams
ti>E JOHN R MINC.
Gonuexr.mrc.
2905MeridlanParkway
Durham, North .: C_0 9 27713
LfcenaD No.: C-0299
(600) 733-156411•M clo-
..""""""•„
N cARo ,
? oe ; •E� •.,
ll Lam';\J`_
o
22286
=�`+. e..
= p •:NGL NES`
(Y
°'8CSNO
KHH-15000
PLAN & PROFILE
YELLOW OAK DRIVE, STA. 9+50 THRII STA 18+50
��� Ilii �E
PHASE I CONSTRUCITON DRAWINGS
APEX NORTH CAROLINA
KHH15000-PH1-P3
___.. _._._..._
DP
MAG
�. 1" = 40'
" = a'
01-05-2016
sN P-3
1M MCADAMS

sWvavaW r
G-03
E lOZ-SO- l0
HOO
dM0
L23-0009LHHNmerxsna
007 t-HHN 'o
��I V
N
z
o n
° O
O
O
xW
y O
zWx
y4
7 N Z �d p
`moo tmi'1
9 C)
03
m
i o
i
9 PoQ to
.. f .
�3N IOH� J�
V
VJ
�O
p �
NOUJAKSNOJ 1104 CHSV3'1Sta - 'JNI41V8(l]"41i
11 04 - qam I
OB 00 OL C Oi
3'IVOS OIHdV2i0
'Z
.,IS O1 3nOW SJ1a0M Jll- A083 —N., .. OZ
ONIAOa3
SNIo38 V3ab MI 31 SNISY8 1N3AGOS TV O1NI SNOLLVJOI 1TNi 1Y mmn03b 38 AVry SNNaa 380% '6t
SAVO 8VONTtlD bl NI - "WaNrOdD
HSIIBV153 IGA. N__ tl0 t S MY 1V. sMoO !SIVA 4VaNTYD L NIww1 (MoH) .- a31VM At_Ao
HDIH OW lT NVNI aMMS S3dOlS 030N8D 'S3H011o OW STVMS NO 8MODONADaO HSn8YIS3 '03SV3D
A116-dNa dAVH S 11DY DNISSMSIG-ONtlI N3 a0 ONGYM9 30 T30B19 3o NOa3ldWO3 a313tl "8l
'Ntlld 9NIOVSD O3AOaddv 3w - 3JNVO AO'JV
Ni 3115 MI d0 mNVM8 sia d0 aiWn 3H1 NIHIM AINO 3OYND HDnOa CNV 'ONI88naD '9NWVTJ NID38 "Ll
SONvnd d0 31VJL3LLa3J NN180 O1 NOLLJs- 315 -NO W 803 'LZb£-6i,Z-636 IV
_js SN80M omAd X3dv Tvo Naw ONY S30N30 DNiddblll iNGA-S Ol NMOHS SY SNOISNWO TVLSNI '9t
's.- .1. TVISNI O1 Aav553o.
SV Alla SYTO 'SNYId 0360Hd V 3HI NO NMOHS SV SMASV3w N3w0 TVISNI '£-85 GNV Z -8S TYISNI 5lr r re r
5
3w 30 NCLLMOd Na3wnOs 3w NI DN5$O8D Wtl3a15 x03 Z-33 NO 3JN3n03S 1081NOJ N05083 QL 839b Yl
SWUlONO3 ING NI 03W80383d 36 NVD Ma o5 DNSSONO OVU IDn815N00 01 mznun \
38 T. 3NNVH0 NOIS-10 1—dA31 V ANY SAVa 833300 'O.A0a0 TBV1S '1VN0.01-1a1T NON HDIN \
AoNj aW SNoUGNW A8a OManO 30Vld 3NY1 TYHS J TY M0 ONLl51X3 Nim HSnli --Ni
38 TYHS Oyd d—ISSIa - dIN 3w -08D GYM IV 1dWAO O350dONd GDa Of L 1DAWSNAO.1Z
Na OM 3H1 31bloSl
01 305 Wtl3lLLSNM00 3w ltl l3NNYHJ DNasiX3 :1w M (WYO -00)3N10 S83dWl NN 1Jnbt$NOD LZl \ \
13NNVHO No1583A 0 3w o1N1 Moll 1a3A10
01 305 Wtl3a15dn 3w IV l3NNYHJ DNLLSIX3 - Ni (AVG 833303) MO SAOMMNI NY 1Dn815NGO 9 z
'ONSSOaO AVMIS ANtl Asl 3w 803 la3Alno ,0£ ONLLSIX3 Ml 3WlIn S'Zl
'NOLLJ3NNOD 3H1 11 83Nn (A.) 1N I.As 80 M .1 OSSd
- 3an33S ONY l3NNYHJ -SIX3 A13alsdn - O1NI 13NNYHO N0S-A NY38ISdn 3 1OANNOO bZt
'NO11O3NN00 3H1 11 63Nn (Wai) IVA 1N3A3Da03N13a Isl OSSd 3w
M.3S ANY 3NNVH3 DNLLSIX3 AYMIS— MI O1N1 l3NNYHO N05a3A10 WV3a1SNM00 - 1 MNOJ A U
lVI831YN TU '.A ,ZI 1SVT 1V DNSn 1V1431VW aMdYl O \�
MI 38n03S SNNV8 IMNYHO 3w DNI V183n0 IVIa3IVN 3D ,b 30 NGAINIA V NI N l3NNYHJ
NOIM.G 3w 30 N0.a A31v Yl 3w NI a3Nn (Axl) ". IN-- — OSSd 3JYld Z Zi \\
`TNNVHO DNII U W1 DNI—Sia in -M TNNYXD WISa3A10 3H1 31VAYJX3 t'ZI
'ONISSOaD I83A1n0 a350dONd Ml x03 l3NNVH3 N01S63n10 WYMIS IDAUSWD 'Zl `
"I'd NO A31.tl ONl SY 1NIOd ONIS— WV3a15 IS -
Sy 3Aa3S IIVA 18— ON -3 'NVId Si NO a31tl010Nl SV SMASY3N a3N10 ONY I -SS IIVISNI "ll
'S3Na TV IY 315 NO AILN3MW08d IlAHM ONOV80 3w 1SOd TYHS a010V&NO3 'Ol
3fW3s
I
i
---i�h•
al^0
3a5-sy,oM oilgnd
aloe
I
saN In,nl!nD A uoiloa:aaa 'sWod
alo0
aulael3-sN,oM a!Iq^d
alo0
ai3
wa3e x31113
MaS/,aloM-sry:>M >ilq^d
a+pG
uogouoacw,l-6uryuoid
aloe
w.;aaasNl sN!pl!ne-wD
i
amG
sul�uold
aroG
uo �p>,od6Ng,l wa
I
a+o0
-A"I,d 'Al,--I,IIM V111d
a;o0
6u!.aaul6u3-ND
£84'0£
­'duo'asayl
J.iaegs ,anoo
ay+ uo P'u5!s `2 oo}!+,a> ay+
usa:n;ou6is
usa:nlou6is
,ad Alelos p no,ddo puo pama!Aa, uaaq so4 3aays si4l loyl Aliya> molaq Paxr}yp
aylAlelos p no,ddo puo pama!na, uaaq soy yaays siy) loyl Afi+,a> molaq paxr};o
ayl
0,Iv113M *�^
11X3/3DNVa1N3 NOLLDn81SNOO
HD110 N01sa3AI0
---i�h•
3ONVeaniS10 30 S11wllal-
MOH ONV Sa313A1tl3d
W1 1d3DX3) MAN
N01133106d 33W
-dl-dl-dL-
3ON3II ITS
-3S -3S -3S -
AVG NO3H0
OS _, 831tl38D
S3dols d03 SAVA-L
wa3e x31113
NO .:L 53dO
W11OR08d 171NI
pWO uo igol3-DW
1311 nO 33N33 Ills
�•I��i
(INHOa'I 'Io2i,LNoO NOISOUR
(53NOZ
I,oltl aae aaoy: mlwe„ I £
l:4 NNit 83llV13
MOH ONV Sa313A1tl3d
W1 1d3DX3) MAN
SAtlO bt
S3MMI NLIM
SV3aV a3w0 1N
-NT NI -1
xa,eN
Na ��
OS _, 831tl38D
S3dols d03 SAVA-L
SAVO bt
NO .:L 53dO
o3MOTN MY
SAVO bl Tr NVH1
pWO uo igol3-DW
l:f NYN!
a3d331SION 3W 0.
'N'NI SST NO
,Ol MY SM- 31
S VC L
lf3d33L5 SMOIS
l
ucwwl1 1- --N
s3.1(MOH)
2-
SAVO L
.- AlllYnO No.
£84'0£
413) P.A>,d ewnpn ofie.els
SM- ONl
3NON
SAtlO L
SM.. 'S3 VM5
'SINla a313rv183d
SNOLLd3OX3 3AVad
3AM1 311
NOLI1-la
3WLL NOLLVLnIetl1S
NOI1tl2n18V15
VM`ills
NOumio
vznimas
7VO03 03AOaddV a0 SLS DVN t0l Z ,0'0 Z-01
ivn03 03AOaddV 80 SLS DVN V90' Fz .00 1-01
(1f/,U) (.1.1)
a3Nn lVNI0n11ONOl 5301S holloE
# l3NNVHO
N01103S
AatlwWnS HOJO NOIS83Na A3VaOdw31
OV V9 6 = V3dV 030drUSK) 3115 NO 1V101
OV £t'6Z = V3?JV 3115 1V101
:d1VG 3115
'03L3ldW0O 30NO 03HOYA ONV 030335 38
-nVHS 3lld NOO1S 3Hi 'U£ NVHl 01Va0 ON S3dOIS 3AVH
IIVHS (INV 1HOGH NI ,OZ 033OX3 ION IIVHS 3lld >WiS
2 -DR IRRHS RaS
)-- 1311-1 38 Mw
��o1 AaYaodw.1 \ _�I� \�3 dgy SZI
D3now3a 3e %i - _ 1H 6l� ;
�\\l' )))
\ , - I
01 �NlGlll.
_ l {
Nod - ¢ I -�♦ fN i„vL
�/
Vl _
�/ r A / ����� ✓L ��, �� l/ / / a3�oVa Vav
80 / 9
5503a1S y 3D I _ u
a3ON0 3A0W3a t SIIWp
38odN]L a
A y�
yry�A d. y4/u' �,�9�bi / , "- ❑ -- -\ `,�a ,/•., _
4
L I �l
"d _.. - .i (.T8'Vi Awrvwns unn MH
/--/F-1F� /./ 335) 83WWIN5 a'� 1 .< / \ �l, \ / ' \ /•�/ ~
-.v3us u r..� ao ow3�iv., 6+
W
`+'� 1 / � i� / _- __- - _� -PaAO sTddre abj" \� � R\ �_� I\I ! \�� %6 i •t, /a3mw3a 39,Ik3 .._-_ 3fJ�d el
l
NOLLOANISN00 3w M O -NIA a SONa33W NOaon-NOo-3ad s3H10 ANY AOa3 31tl8Vd3S SI ONLL 3
W S
`
dAm ` • ¢Vq ; _{ l; - - ':.'a. / - __ _
S3LLNLLDY DNIatlaD ANtl Ot aOMd
.1 -64Z -6t6 lY (a3HV8 Aana) SNGIO3d5Nl ON -A. I DN -A ' l - ^ ' 'F / � / /9 4 q5 / � �� \ /'� � r,�\ � - f� � ( � I � I
NOLLJnaISNOJ-3ad tl �NYaatl 'sN0a03dSM ONIa1N8 AB a3nSSl ONY Q3M3N38 sl llwa3d DMoYlJ Y 3DND 'fi ;� 0 Zl )I / 1 5 4 / (V, ('d O NOLLD310ad
3dW U'/9/ �� (( \ i Y / j 4 2 33a1/3JNid os
'(NOISV.Io SNMa MSNl mnn. wo. NN180) NOLLVJnddr llrva3d DNIavNo 3 r3 mo 9 A / , ' / / j 3dOH . 'ONIJN33 ll5 SN05a311a Aatla0dW3L '3JNtla1N3 NOLLOnBLSNOJ Ttl15Ni 'L ♦ . ,-� ... +y �-- � -'(- I (8tl1 AatlWWns 3351\­AJI
\/IN3S38d 38 TYHS aJkaY1N3s38d38 S,83N9N3 ONtl - -• ,. - - i }/ / �- ,.l A - ` 9 , m sINsnINYdY 350
Sl O
>utD 1 _
'a01DtlaLNOD '3ALLV1N353ad3a S.a3MA0'3VIS NMO1 83HLD ONY Sa01J3d5N1 DN183NIDN3 HIM DN1133ry 9 es/ .rte s31oN)'7t ouTY155 i x032 \ �4 �+- 1•�
NOODnaLSNOJ-3ad tl Tno3HJ5 'OLS£-ebZ-Bl6 ltl a0SNa3dn5 53JN835 O13L1 DNI833N40N3 3Hl On08w _ ) ' /. '� i , ! / / 3Ndl
+ _ l NIYdO 3dOlS 33 f ,"
"LZbf-64Z-618 1V 33Is SN80M * + + * . d --' ) 1.p .8t Aa�dOdW31 ) VH \ t 3Dtl1S S\
onend rroal SMASV3A I081NOO N050a3 ANY WlIVIN3W103S 8W IVAOaddV -d 10—sl V 1S3n03a 'S * X 0 ;0 p y / _ _ /" /) r- 03AOw3a 38 p, \ f \ 9
/ / __ _ I I m sDNl�nlne V � .'
'33V1S Sm. Ol A, Ol NADLddV OaYMa03 TVA Y //o� f / ONI1S1X3, ) \ 1 �� .- % °R, �I J' -------
ON KNV
ONINNVtd 'S38nSY3W No803IONd 30 NOLLOMSNl WNti V x03 9Z4£-BbZ IV DNIN- TVO 'malnosa 38 /�� / 11 t ! 1
Avn - s38 -A NOLLJ3108d -ANY 801OW 'SNOTS 'DNIDN3a AOaO310a8 33x1 03Aoaddtl TV1SNi 4 . / ('dlO) / / /y ' / �9 \� \V , <
/ I3uno 30FF13dd - -
SNOLLVOOI ONIDN31 NOLLD3108d 33x1 x03 ltlAOaddtl / / r 6 / �` T,•I\ XlVd 1138YaD \
153n03a O1 9Z4£ -64Z-818 ltl a3JI13o 3JNYndWGO ONINOZ 1NAAINVd30 ONINNVIa XUV NY IDVINOD
3H
sT NOLLD310ad �// / I (
L DW ANY 'SV3atl NOLLD310ad 3x1 'S—AC 'SI—YS AllfldOad DYli aM0A3n3A
8nS tl tlH 'Z / °` �/% OSF / 9
DNINNYld ADa3 NN18D) NOI.VDIIddV IIAa NOl1YTY1SN1 ONIDN3d N0I133I08d/3381 IGO TI1 'i / .+ / '��/ J � �♦y�`y �� ;� I /' / 3ON311liS
NDLO N01583N0
/ }
�/ / Aaraodrv3l z-aI / / s / A - \ t HJ11a Nase3No ��1 /
Wtl0 N-0 AaVa0d1'f3,.
-
,y� / / YTINoO 3o Noluhol 31Ywlxo/aeaY
I
ti \
1rvYDtln 3sn
nD-aw 'DNINOZ
9£99-08£LLD 'oaa 39tlON Md
%
oT
us, s3ua3d1Nw 1/- \/ ' G `a-✓�' ��\ / / -'-i dAq mo aTo3XJ � �•`�'\ \' ' � t
�2n, �_
/ 11"`NOLLD310ad�33a1 W / �J`� / / ONIj51%3
m `A
i
��'- > a' ��i � / "' '" -. -- � i / / l�✓ / / ' / Al � 3DB I`�'sv
\ +.�, • / / OV3Hb3n0 ONIl51X3
�-- -_ �.7��` - �_\.�_ay`� I\ a��\� - j v"_��/ •✓ 'a / i � \� X38 013nbIR3a
"� �- V �_ S71I1.SVfiLQ,leT02L�::SI09V�'e �'��+� / % �s v l w ov3Haino IMlslraA
yps�yasNHKap0adru'�—
e�\�
AliwY3 TDNIs '3sn I9f7cj 09 �" �`�0•'LI�I�;TitIY ,\e- Av+:e/
lV b l8 -££LO
nDg DNINONoz V V Nid Q� Y9 .�-' hfi'SNK?d -3 � ��- ' \•r:.sy + //
t
NOWOIS
31A� X3XtlOi a0 MOON O
I S,,Va
.14 \41 '^ .
S3 -A313N
43.e08 a0 MON
a I I /4\ 1 I I. �'tn\� . .•
\ E
�-I la I H3La No b3Na� / 664
N
y NOLLD310 d 3381 V J I
v v
- �. \ , \ 8333ne Zo3NOZ
NION 1.OZ
\ 1
k_ \\I
\ \ \\ S '
p 1
Noz
\\ \
+rrNpaaor o
llX3/3DNV81N3 / I \ S )
� NOLLJnaMjjS5NOJ
'I.4
'\ 3e O A111(1 A11AV3 310NS Mn
\ ZO Od-9NINOZ
E 1 t£E £LO 'ON Md
t / I \ aNrnoff oH wHIas w iNHDm
I,oltl aae aaoy: mlwe„ I £
6ul>odc eylon o>wl FAv uo alp)ap p>S Z
ay way iV61aV>9xXLeA
ono ni Xz 'wmn ro ma on o+ eaew
aVF my Aluo ul>yatl eadale ap15 •l
xa,eN
Y/N
(M),alawe0 mea
,/N
pWO uo igol3-DW
0z
(N) a=s "Po mwwPS
OS'z
(NO .AS mwwps
l
ucwwl1 1- --N
C89'01
(.13) Pna,d reN aao4^5 iwu6pa6
06S'L
(di) P.baa pop croy'g luaugpaS
£84'0£
413) P.A>,d ewnpn ofie.els
ZSB'Fi
413) Plleb^a -1A ---'I
£a
G3) mpw aol to m1
OLl
(11) NS -1 dwl to mi
S
(1.1) oj.H
9t
(L1) 418ual A -0s
AI -H OS
-dolS op15
0'9
(13) A>ml@tls A>ue6,cw3 A, lea9 al N1 G
S'£
(J8) m°a A, )¢op of Vldo
S't
(ylda0 }uauryPeS woy) P,vonoo,3
S'£
U3) 4lma FuawiPaS
OS'Lb£
(y1) uenonaa -e
001-1
(Sn) Oto •eid
LS'f
("DY) owtl Pe Nsa
LB"4
(0tl) oa,Y a6oulw0
i -es
al oral 1N3wg3s
TBVl Na53a ../MSV8 YM A'n AWuW31
ANVWA(3S NiSY9 iN3A1a3S
NDLO N01583N0
/ }
�/ / Aaraodrv3l z-aI / / s / A - \ t HJ11a Nase3No ��1 /
Wtl0 N-0 AaVa0d1'f3,.
-
,y� / / YTINoO 3o Noluhol 31Ywlxo/aeaY
I
ti \
1rvYDtln 3sn
nD-aw 'DNINOZ
9£99-08£LLD 'oaa 39tlON Md
%
oT
us, s3ua3d1Nw 1/- \/ ' G `a-✓�' ��\ / / -'-i dAq mo aTo3XJ � �•`�'\ \' ' � t
�2n, �_
/ 11"`NOLLD310ad�33a1 W / �J`� / / ONIj51%3
m `A
i
��'- > a' ��i � / "' '" -. -- � i / / l�✓ / / ' / Al � 3DB I`�'sv
\ +.�, • / / OV3Hb3n0 ONIl51X3
�-- -_ �.7��` - �_\.�_ay`� I\ a��\� - j v"_��/ •✓ 'a / i � \� X38 013nbIR3a
"� �- V �_ S71I1.SVfiLQ,leT02L�::SI09V�'e �'��+� / % �s v l w ov3Haino IMlslraA
yps�yasNHKap0adru'�—
e�\�
AliwY3 TDNIs '3sn I9f7cj 09 �" �`�0•'LI�I�;TitIY ,\e- Av+:e/
lV b l8 -££LO
nDg DNINONoz V V Nid Q� Y9 .�-' hfi'SNK?d -3 � ��- ' \•r:.sy + //
t
NOWOIS
31A� X3XtlOi a0 MOON O
I S,,Va
.14 \41 '^ .
S3 -A313N
43.e08 a0 MON
a I I /4\ 1 I I. �'tn\� . .•
\ E
�-I la I H3La No b3Na� / 664
N
y NOLLD310 d 3381 V J I
v v
- �. \ , \ 8333ne Zo3NOZ
NION 1.OZ
\ 1
k_ \\I
\ \ \\ S '
p 1
Noz
\\ \
+rrNpaaor o
llX3/3DNV81N3 / I \ S )
� NOLLJnaMjjS5NOJ
'I.4
'\ 3e O A111(1 A11AV3 310NS Mn
\ ZO Od-9NINOZ
E 1 t£E £LO 'ON Md
t / I \ aNrnoff oH wHIas w iNHDm

swv(iv W r
9lOZ-SO-10
.Ob -„L
Hoo
dM0
103-OOOS1HH5i �1r
OOOSL-HHNo
°z
zz
a z
Aa o
Aa0
aO
°z
cl
cn
W
z CD x
�
zW
"� x o
” < ro
z
C � >
CD
a� In
w
D�
��3N I `J•,1,'• yV '•
6•;Y0
tit
V
O
6 H
N
W
V�
s "
\JIB,)=121 L�N,0) T10.1 Ud SV'd'1:1H - !)MAVe1U ' IV.Nid
OW113M
tlsir
N011VnM3SN03 33anV3V
l8S
11X3/33NVa1N3 NOunnals Noo
Hotlo NOIS8310 -- —f—s—
V3dY 03000m �YYYYYy\
3,
8,s10 30 S11WI'1 _0l Ol
No11331o6d 3331—dl—dt—dt-
33N31Ills —35-3S—d5—
a1 or uo>al z
YNDS 011!dVH`J n' 1Vn03 03AOifddV 2iO SLS DVN z0 LZ .0'0 4-01l
g 1tln03 03A(DPIddV 80 SLS DVN ZSO' rz .0'0 £-01
e W/li) (13)
6 a3Nn lVNICInBON01 S301S A01L08
13NNVHO
NOLL035
AwmvinS H3110 NOIS83AIG ),WHOOd��A31.
OV 456 = vD8v 03eaniS,Q 3116 No 3a1o1 1
oV £1'6Z = V3HV 3115 Mol
:b1` G 31IS
S133HS MS 335
dtladla Vd SSV'10 7.0033
1Vd
a0 /
I5S10 A1pOl3A � </
09 CC '13 = NOS .4Z) lnO 'ANI
06'8£9 015 1000N aid TIVMON3
(Ola8V3 31LLX31030 NI
md8vm sl Nlor)
1£9'0 ® dDb
`ONIa-O III SSVlO 0.4Z 31 Ob
(NOuomusw0 oNnIna o3oonld NIYV138 OIL WOO NanL ,Z)
L£
1613 HS MS 33) /
5L'£ = (doa ONIa-0 0.4Z) 1n0 la3ANl1
00"Z4£ = a351a 30 d01
b - '1d 4 = SN01SN3 11 lVNa31Ni
AM1,11.1 111-
WVO N33H3
uold a.c - eddy. y.ine.iw £
6u.ode ayfoq x04.1
OEM
ano
33'S-wl M oiq'd
alo0
'saa laynllnO )p volaoaynaa 'sNyod
.00
a '3-sX' M al9nd
_ aloo
_--_._ .. ._ ayl3 ..
ajOQ _
Mas/ya3PfA sX oM a,lgnd
slop
uol yodsuv- 6u old
lop
uc }aedsu 6 18 W3
.lop
6u_ uold
atop
uo loy d uoyl W-.
alr.O
swoy6oyd 'nu3-sX:oM a!Ignd
ancO
5ulyaau 6u3 W3
00'Z
uold uo Fony;suoa asayl p leay oo
.,N uo P 5,6 svo] )Yao syl
yatl .(labs
panoydtlo p o p--, vasq soy hays s yl
1 4 A,!pl,
.1j1q P1, )10 say F 6 s ay_
OW113M
tlsir
N011VnM3SN03 33anV3V
l8S
11X3/33NVa1N3 NOunnals Noo
Hotlo NOIS8310 -- —f—s—
V3dY 03000m �YYYYYy\
3,
8,s10 30 S11WI'1 _0l Ol
No11331o6d 3331—dl—dt—dt-
33N31Ills —35-3S—d5—
a1 or uo>al z
YNDS 011!dVH`J n' 1Vn03 03AOifddV 2iO SLS DVN z0 LZ .0'0 4-01l
g 1tln03 03A(DPIddV 80 SLS DVN ZSO' rz .0'0 £-01
e W/li) (13)
6 a3Nn lVNICInBON01 S301S A01L08
13NNVHO
NOLL035
AwmvinS H3110 NOIS83AIG ),WHOOd��A31.
OV 456 = vD8v 03eaniS,Q 3116 No 3a1o1 1
oV £1'6Z = V3HV 3115 Mol
:b1` G 31IS
S133HS MS 335
dtladla Vd SSV'10 7.0033
1Vd
a0 /
I5S10 A1pOl3A � </
09 CC '13 = NOS .4Z) lnO 'ANI
06'8£9 015 1000N aid TIVMON3
(Ola8V3 31LLX31030 NI
md8vm sl Nlor)
1£9'0 ® dDb
`ONIa-O III SSVlO 0.4Z 31 Ob
(NOuomusw0 oNnIna o3oonld NIYV138 OIL WOO NanL ,Z)
L£
1613 HS MS 33) /
5L'£ = (doa ONIa-0 0.4Z) 1n0 la3ANl1
00"Z4£ = a351a 30 d01
b - '1d 4 = SN01SN3 11 lVNa31Ni
AM1,11.1 111-
WVO N33H3
uold a.c - eddy. y.ine.iw £
6u.ode ayfoq x04.1
OEM
9-03
NO aaVOCNl SV 3015 Na3MOOs WY3aLS NNOa 3Nl ONO,V T1VM QN3 Md30 NOaOna1SHM ONI0038 '£
"SNOt110N0O ANO NI Q�WM Id 38N11 ASSN, OS O SOtA3 Oro. ID—SHOO O1 03Zmn
38 — ,3 H0 NOISa3A10 AaYM .. V aW S.VO x33300 'M INN. 310V1S 1-11o105A -NON 'HOIN
Aa39 a31,Li
a4; 4+04 346!.4
" ONV SNOWON00 Aaa ONana 3OVld 3NV111. 1a0M 11V 3OVNO OAUSIU HIM HS 03„Y1SNI
39 -NS OVd AMYd1A dtla dM 3Hl 9NISSOao OVOS 1V 183A,no -0W d0a .9£ (t) IOnal — Z
YIN
p
Y0 'IVY 3H: 31Y,p51
Nof-031.0ad 13111
t
YWI
O1 3015 WY3aL5NNOQ 391 ltl l3NNYNO ONLLSIX3 331 NI (Wtlo a31f0O) 3310 SnoNa3dWl Ntl 1JnaL5N0O 9'Zt
Y/N
VN
12NWHD NOISATSO 3LL MM MO 1.330
1311!10 33133 1115
SZ'Z
Ol 30S WY31LLsdn 391 IV 13NNYHO ONLLSIX 391 Al (NYO H3 D) 3310 SM—Al Ntl Ion— S'ZL
00'Z
OS'Z
'N OLL03NN00 391 lY NANn (Will) 1VW 1NIIVKMO3Nt3a 38M OS9d
t
l
391 MN­ONV 13NWHO ONLLSIX3 4302Sdn 391 O1NI 13NWHO NOISa3Al0 WV3MLSd0 391 1033300 b'Zt
Ql�'3.�'3� Z(]xZN O� NOIS O��
'NOLL03NNOO 3Ht 11 Y3N1 (Will) IV. I.MOa03N3a J-— 331
Cd3) Pnoyd oary eao4ns lu.wlDaS
O40't
3Mb IS ONY 13NNVHo ONU-3 WV3alSNNOQ 331 O1NI ,3NNVHo NOISdWa rvY3aL WO 331 103NNOO C'ZL
(d3) P. -a -,v .—m ;uewaaS
09£'Z
-ma31VW — 30 ,zL 1S— 1V MNtsn ,YIa31Vw M3ddv .
(c13) 1A d -1A .6—S
9ZL'L
3HL 38M S 'SAWS ,3NNVH0 391 ONIddYla3A0 ,VIN31tlry A ,b 30 NnAINIW V HLN1 2 YHO
NOS. 10 391 30 AO Sod OUVAYOX3 331 NI 63Nn (Wal) 1tlry 1N3W3Oa03Nl3a 3a(ll OSSd 30Vid ZZl
(U) p.ylnb.a awnpA .—,S
Ob
13NNVHO OM.SIX3 391 ONONNIS(O 1— 1314— NO6 10 391 MVAYOX3 —
(13) 41PLN do31 io dol
'ONISSOL'O la3A,n3 o3SO—d 391 x03 T NNYHO NOSa1110 WY3US 10na1SNOO 't
0311m8fS aWolO
AtlM 00011 Q3sC
s/✓ /� d
�` I 1 wd dYaamfe ssYro I
% - -�� � �/ Mfll • �s • At9 / � �--�) (lE"IBtl1 Aatlrvnrs 33s)
� / *�Q£mLq` / y� (s) a3rvwulS�
s.
7*/
/ o � SIN3)L1aVdV :35n
(a3Nn JM Ail- OC) \ 1- 3W -OH :ONINOZ
{ \ rbt 1 �' 1� /p>Y!-�,/�. 110 'ON NII
" ♦' , 30TH , t AYMllids / °' f ✓1 ',t9ao'01 SO a3AV38
➢ / J" / I \ I AIa3waoe ao MON
` f ` ✓ j ('dAl) /53113Y�,alOJ /� ebf � m ✓�§ ' I Ii
i /�ti��
(S133HS,6MS, 3 1
1.11l1QWj 1N3W30
1dMmois,
1 � C3,etl1 Aavwwrn 33s>
i I Z-85
I i
'I1 W3SY3 5
//-arvq 30NYN31NrvH SAO tlW8
/4 i j / .Sl 13IYe0dY♦31.
r-
$
s
w� 113.00.
j� ANMOdW31 ,,\1.J
N as " r \\ 133t•s z"'� 33sY � / / / ; � - � s� ,
r
i/HMO 543NM
/l\ j l Ila
.yam .' . / M � '_ ✓ \ � �� \� � \ � � ) '
\
("ko
"
�., 3W1NYaez �or
WWI S
r y y
335) a3rvWgS -OM
1
S11SA4 3 of
Nraacr - v
d0 NOLLYTHISN N63 - \
-
1N3n03s NOLLOna15N00
IP
/ 3Nld ,(
_ a �� (d14
^ . / IiON. NOIS
fAH
3ON3.i" 1,19
a O3AOW3a 38 1 9
�ONIH'na ONIS X3 ' 1
is
„ / a do sown l v J
3JNVBanL.n E
� F _ 7 30 511wrt1 .1A -So
/ VVVTTT
�\ F
j
/ 6
/ tfliaOBt 3NOZ 9 \ MIS— 38
C
Ll 3— .Y l OL \� 1 \ sONlalln8 ONi15l%3 V
---
T—Da laaHS aas
8 3dA11 .OL
RL_� _ a
NI101
r 6,
"Pt
r
M -n oa3wSo 3>m
,{y I Ai am ao moN
�Nrdi „6 L
��3ni1�L s 1r
A. 40 _Io oa5 'z
a4; 4+04 346!.4
-;04 A4 wog. .z uu {0 O
- q
- .y3 ») .(luoau 1d -dole .pS
YIN
V/N
CNU y.;ewol0 l.uog
V/N
V/N
(N) --a IS
Y/N
VN
Noo18 uoSo4o11 QW
00 t
SZ'Z
(NI) -!S -UNO y.wwiry5
00'Z
OS'Z
(NI) -IS '---I'S
t
l
u.ww.XS fo rogwnN
099'1
Ofib'St
Cd3) Pnoyd oary eao4ns lu.wlDaS
O40't
OZS'4
(d3) P. -a -,v .—m ;uewaaS
09£'Z
099'65
(c13) 1A d -1A .6—S
9ZL'L
-'£L
(U) p.ylnb.a awnpA .—,S
Ob
6OI
(13) 41PLN do31 io dol
I
S'II
(La) —. M 4461..
Ol
9I
(.3) NI — x..N s
At:H 0'£ At:H 0'£
.adolS .,IS
SZ
5'b
(Li).(PuiydS (Pu.6yew3 l0 4e.yO o; yldea
b
9'9
(A3> —N, to 1., o1 Md.Q
S't
0'Z
(Nd.O ;4."pn —4) N- -1,
5'z
S"b
(13) m -o a.. -,P..
WL
SL"LtC
(13) uo low(3 wo;;o8
f8'Y
SL'bt
(sso) NIS Mott
84'
49'£
('OY) o.ry Pa4�N.10
f9't
BB'b
('Otl) oap seoury0
£-a5
Z 8S
0 dVa11N3w103s
318V1 MGM
dri1/NIStl8 83NAINS AarMSNw
miwo nS NISd8 IN31N143S
0311m8fS aWolO
AtlM 00011 Q3sC
s/✓ /� d
�` I 1 wd dYaamfe ssYro I
% - -�� � �/ Mfll • �s • At9 / � �--�) (lE"IBtl1 Aatlrvnrs 33s)
� / *�Q£mLq` / y� (s) a3rvwulS�
s.
7*/
/ o � SIN3)L1aVdV :35n
(a3Nn JM Ail- OC) \ 1- 3W -OH :ONINOZ
{ \ rbt 1 �' 1� /p>Y!-�,/�. 110 'ON NII
" ♦' , 30TH , t AYMllids / °' f ✓1 ',t9ao'01 SO a3AV38
➢ / J" / I \ I AIa3waoe ao MON
` f ` ✓ j ('dAl) /53113Y�,alOJ /� ebf � m ✓�§ ' I Ii
i /�ti��
(S133HS,6MS, 3 1
1.11l1QWj 1N3W30
1dMmois,
1 � C3,etl1 Aavwwrn 33s>
i I Z-85
I i
'I1 W3SY3 5
//-arvq 30NYN31NrvH SAO tlW8
/4 i j / .Sl 13IYe0dY♦31.
r-
$
s
w� 113.00.
j� ANMOdW31 ,,\1.J
N as " r \\ 133t•s z"'� 33sY � / / / ; � - � s� ,
r
i/HMO 543NM
/l\ j l Ila
.yam .' . / M � '_ ✓ \ � �� \� � \ � � ) '
\
("ko
"
�., 3W1NYaez �or
WWI S
r y y
335) a3rvWgS -OM
1
S11SA4 3 of
Nraacr - v
d0 NOLLYTHISN N63 - \
-
1N3n03s NOLLOna15N00
IP
/ 3Nld ,(
_ a �� (d14
^ . / IiON. NOIS
fAH
3ON3.i" 1,19
a O3AOW3a 38 1 9
�ONIH'na ONIS X3 ' 1
is
„ / a do sown l v J
3JNVBanL.n E
� F _ 7 30 511wrt1 .1A -So
/ VVVTTT
�\ F
j
/ 6
/ tfliaOBt 3NOZ 9 \ MIS— 38
C
Ll 3— .Y l OL \� 1 \ sONlalln8 ONi15l%3 V
---
T—Da laaHS aas
8 3dA11 .OL
RL_� _ a
NI101
r 6,
"Pt
r
M -n oa3wSo 3>m
,{y I Ai am ao moN
�Nrdi „6 L
��3ni1�L s 1r

\011-M,'4,1SNQJ 2104 QTSVTI3H - ONI.4tVUG 'IVN11
T'IVOS ZIIHdVHJ
Yi
2
0V C9'6 = V38V 0MJi S10 31IS NO Mol
OV £t'6Z = V38V 3115 Mol
:VlV4 311S
(HOLLOnNLSN00 BNNnO O DWT%d NIV Ol WOO WIM .Z)
(5133HS MS 33S)
OS'SYC (d0a ON- 0.9L) 1No la3ANi
OS 6Y£ - N351a JO -
'1d SNO5N3WI0 -N31N1
('d10 13LO0
mN. 1115 -ter \
slop
335-sWoM >!19^d
a}op
'saN Ian11n0 3 uognYoab 'sviod
a}op
>u}sail-sHsoM o.lynd
- a}op
aJ.j
a}op
na5/aloM SWUM a'ynd
\
6�
-_-
a_op
1N3W35tl33OVNItla0
WNO1S nand
atop
I
uo!}>adsul 5u!pl!ng-ry0
_
_uo!}oyodsuoil-bu!uuold
__
a•,00
bu!uuoid
a}np
uoyouoaaamrwo
aloe
wo�6oid 3 h'oM >�Iq d
.._-a}oa
6w,aaw6u3-Yi]
uold uo }ongeuoa ae1.. }o }says
ay} uo p 6 oo lrva> ay}
iad Al.,-pano�dtlo 0 o pax,a nau uaaq so.}
}says sF}ya>
y1 }oy} 11
mol q p t} ainiou6s ay1�
T'IVOS ZIIHdVHJ
Yi
2
0V C9'6 = V38V 0MJi S10 31IS NO Mol
OV £t'6Z = V38V 3115 Mol
:VlV4 311S
(HOLLOnNLSN00 BNNnO O DWT%d NIV Ol WOO WIM .Z)
(5133HS MS 33S)
OS'SYC (d0a ON- 0.9L) 1No la3ANi
OS 6Y£ - N351a JO -
'1d SNO5N3WI0 -N31N1
('d10 13LO0
mN. 1115 -ter \
d r
r i 1N3 N
NYANotifs -'
YM1000N�'iwua3'load (l3ixi
Nvda a01 IO )11007
prvYu.3rn v _
8Y'J 31LL%'9ip30
q3 kV Sl�ibrl / / �. -��. ANYa0drv31 - _ \ \ m� 9
l -9S
11x3/3ONYa1N3 rvoHonalsNoo � � � 3r1tl1 NYoaor oz " , - r;, � • �7. .% , / -F-ro, J, -- _ / 1 \ �-e6 r �1fi' 4 i _ � , � _ � I �,, � �• ;
YMV 03OOOM r'YY-YYYY1 ' `- /�" > WAOl"%1g3W35Y3^553VJDY'-, , /�� ' �� �• L/--fY"� Y l i \ \ SZ '�
v . , , � >o~3awYN3lNIYry awe . 1 � e i / (.�) _. � '� , 0 8 �� \ •�\ _A g� ._ _ �r�_.
J �
30NY86n1Slo jo sllwn _�,—� v, 1 ' :�,,, I< / ! /k/ �� 6n�✓" �.i "� u- �� �� �$, {. AaVaPaw31 /. ¢ �� Vv -B0 V / M 1 6' '� • �'
NO1103106d 33W—a—a— \1 ,�-Z '� .''/jPff'n`'}- /j7.[ j �� _-_.. - - - �I I ,� s e� /,^„-MI•l. 6
30N3J Ills—JS-35—JS—j '.'-�� "� NOO�YWii ”" •'� //�% 1; 0011 M3� �-,�'��
AIG M33r0-
\-
W63e 6311Id
�' �" TSyo$lil90 ' � f"� i � C: � la lavaodw3l s 3EpNri13•d. � r 1 4 s � �/' ��,A V '' -`r- � � (
NOUO310ad 13111i y�y,; Q3,ItItl9n511W070 dg / /, lar ' 3dOH .5I J7 ZZ �� A �� 33W \ V A
k,} _ `.✓.va ao0v d, r✓ y51ti ,� r'� z01 -e0 (dlJ
13-uno 3aN3J nlsIll��lir �� /z A0Mer33aoXp.rtYi�13 ens y - ; Y /' / v o s.5�.I. r �'��` V;• C , _ .ffiV - , slrausdr 3sn
i€1srLac L0oN Nm
ne - (( r '�
QN3`J 3•I 'IO2ISN00 N0ISOUR A3zi3wao3 ao MON
A a'�. ( aT` •tawm arm
• �.. ` � ^ " ^ :- / // / �.✓ � .y i 30 NOLLYTItl15Ni 803 \ - � ('dA!) WYO MO3NO C" / \ � ��I
•' .' - /. = / � r' /. � � y � Lv'7^\YJS 315 , \"r _ � � �'" j ���\ �� �- i
n3sn
aa..SS v
K9sH-oz0 oN sW
a-c£'�"�,'. f � � �. J✓' S OCii � � V ,. / n A '\ { - v � � � k �V � 1 / � e �� p
aT 'ziav io s3ua3aoad 3OY /,/ t ; A� 81!
A3a3wao3 ao mo-
- a Nastyvo(
X16
13S 13
MU NI 53H5 .MS. SONMYNO / / ` / / _ (� , / 6 \ A \ � ` , F'd,AU 30N33 1'15 ii v�
MJ1530 03AO8ddY 3H1 0tl S3WM5 1N3NVWa3d 3H1 O1 Z -BS ONV 4-651b3AN00 Yl -7'BOrsJ
3115 3H1 30 30NVN31NNW MO NOJ NOW831N-8
3 d a0J 3111SNOdSMI SI 0NMO '£t �`moi
N0u3ldra0 s _
JO 3LWJI3LLa30 Y 1S—N Ot ONb Nolo— 3115 1- .1 -1-61Z 616 / \`/ W 015 0n8nd , \ N\� //
lb J3V's SNaSm omn,I TY0 '03HSn-S3 N33e S. NOLLtl13O�A N3- 'Z1 � f / / d` f _ � - \ y �� \ `\ � 'h • / j'. '� ('dAl) NQLLJ3lO1,
_ 33N1/3ON3311i5
'1NIOd SIH1 1b 03TV15N1 3B
MM S 53OW30 10a1No0 NOISOa3 1N3N-- 111 SY 34Ve ONLLlnS3a ANV 3\tld � � ' / � % O S ` / / � � / OL t -I / � �\ F ( } \ \ �-,,, \ I \ 1 1 / 1 ILII% ( ��- I• 2'JrC1 \I18
NO a3no0 31YnOmv 3OK08d ON' '013 'ON10N3J ITIS 'SNOLSa MIC AaYbOdW31 3AOW3a 'lt � - \ / /
s�m30 0...H-
10MI03S AaVa0dW3l w0aJ 1N3Wt03S '3A0143a ONV NY3'p 53d'd W31SA5 N31VMWa015
TV NY310 ONl HSnIJ `0313'bw00 aNV 03Z 111 11 Z 3OV15 JO -nM Naw -OI
(13v;i
"032niBVLS ONV O30335 ''-WLYNN d0 1333 9 41- MY 5101 Tlb 3an65V E NCV— 1
'NoubznleVlS aoa 1IVHdSV JO In 1S4w �
3. HlM1 ONON Z i54Li ONs W 0310na1S1400 SAYM - ONO" 35Is 3N015 11Y15N1 '8 i I��I / j/9 •i y / �, � � • �y��, � V ;f V 1 p �� • Z ,
sxv0 a N O
1l NI HLtM a OOONnONo HSn8V1S3 1Shw NaiY NO l £ 38Y 1- S -S 'SAYO 1dOlS, AA - - - `M / ♦ �`, Y \ s V A-� V't V I , , /
03VOtlip n53H011 OW S� M5 NNO SMOOONnOo8D HSn8b1S 035Y3OHAl a0dW3133AVH 11YNl AYMN33NO 1, _ /9 O` 111 19 1N3W35Y3 3OVNItlaO // i / / J`•y�� \�\� \ - \ 1.\ \ r \ \\ , I I ' 1
,ol 3aru J Warns 3<Ya ad .0z
53LLN13V ONIS-10-ON1n N3- NO ONIOVNO JO 3SVNd ANV JO NOLL3I— N31JV 'L n / �'i ��%/// S A`•'•A, \ "-� ( V`- \ �. A A l
30N3�U115
'03033N Sl 53anSY3W 3i NIVINIVW SNYId NO NMOHS
SV -S- --a3Ht0 -/a 'S.- `INZ 'S3.0N30 NOLL0310Nd 131NI m _ � ! / 30Nv8a 0 /yam \ � (��l � � 0 �j \ \�'
H1SN -NI10310ad ONtl 318V011ddV JI 'N3M35 WN015 30 NOUVTV15Nl 3nNLLN0O H _ -��` ' / / '
'gild
NMOHS NOUV 13lIdN0015 3H1 N- IDTOad 3. 30 OND 3Hl lY SY3aV _`` ?\\� Jam_-�' m e / �Sr., / // `!L ,•� / �� ` \\� \ -} 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \p �'- 1
03?NOLL0310Nd 131NIon
HHIMONI £Na0M13-DoN 3OYWNIVaO Xa015dol J. nO031Y15N�01 tl31YM a01S OIS £ 'K '0 �`5 !�&� �y "� % / / �� 1p / (j� LOl-80
\\1Nar�slb NNOIOL �,� a
llY 1N3n10 "5301,30 IONLN00 NOISOa3 AabWWd 3HL 5V Z -BS ONY 4 -OS 3ZnLLn-^3�
315 JO ISM H11M 30VN0 HOWN 01 1NW" JO MIS 1S O 8 S\oz
3NYl Oa HOZ I
S1I-IM WNI 13NNtlHO 1a3A10 ONY Ol 011110d 3 OW3a '(SWtl0 a3ii00) 3NI0 - ,_\ o - I +a '` -� T ��� _ OI �..p,. r_ \ \/ \ b� /• / / l / \V 4-80 \ R \ \ \j ` r .' I II, )' �- 3dV SONY �OB
�N
SnONa3dWi 3TOW3tl 'Q'31tl15Ni 38V 1a311no oNb lmMONW. 305 Na3LSY3 30N0 i £ k3 \ _I �Fn �` \ i � ` y� -�°�•� / � / �,� ` � � �� �® � \ Og\ � 1g� `� { �� �\ 7, (_ � \ � � II I II \ I (
-r .S.. arm IN3n1110 .O£ Na3tsv3 io `� �� � �'• � �' - � / �� '� \ t _ l I I
NO1Yi1Y15Ni ONtl 1N3W30Yid tlOJ MO11Y OL 1tl311fp .0£ M3N Dl W13N15 la?AIO £ £
1 l TVMONVA ONV la3Al(Y0 -_ _ _ - i- �� 1 ���� •""� \ %'C�jy`= per` 0$ ��i �`O1P _ 1 Q'' �BKNVONOC' Q IA-� `A
.o£ Na3<svi 3w. WA monr of £-03 No Gao3LYOICNIWw sY wb0 tlM Hlm£
Na315tl3 3H1 JO NO—SNI Md 1nOH1 W 3lBIS50d Sl VgnW 5b 30VNO Ol 53dO15 -� m `.� \" k3
ONWB ONY a33419N3 NJINH031030 3Ht -n 030NSI 1-a SV 2 M31 3HS 30NONNI ! \
3OI5 iS3M 3H1 HLV3 O3Ttl15Ni SIN 33N A£ M3N 3N1 30N0 4'£
JNSSOW XV3a1S 1N3NtlwN3d JO NOLLYlVISNI 'E \ \ / "1^ 1� f es- !"` � �-
1-iS96 H1w O311Y1SN1 5.30N30 10a1N00 N050a3 35n ONV I-NIVW Ol 3nN N00
'S30w30 353H1 IN NI Ol ANVSS303N SV "NO NY310 'SI -d Q3AOaddV Z'3JFI5 3N1 - -- 1 �S[�d �" Q•"i - � x 'e\` \ �, �_ '�_ ` _ L 1 _ ) \
AIIWVJ 3PJNI5_35 Po '}�_ ' /
NO NMOMS
Sy 53an5V3w N3H10 a0/nrm 'ON10N33 1115 'srvol$a3nla ANYa0dW31 TY15Ni 'L NO SIS �_ r.\ \`
n0 -OW 'nNINn '
1.1 -t8 -££LO ON Nld / A[� ry,' NSC .�. \�, b h\ / X11\ \ \ I I• I�, -'
'i30Nna 0NY1 03OON30 .. 031 W.1 I 6 \ \ I\
130 ION 5300 mmona vwN1 ORW.SN'OO A^M.3N 3Nn5SV Cl NOLLO310ad 31NYNd315 8 M3aONV I "'' •N{` 1'
13'INI
OW
3ON3 116 Hl. O31O310dd SI 13OYiS JO N31WW1 3N— Z 3OV15
Ain maws
n
-od ONw0z
'ON NW
yadv0vn ON-ONHi3e n 1-1.b :ONINoz w i� �I ✓, l V A A183Wa0.1 ao MON
_
SL £t A`rfl� ©rrvOrN NW
i )
i
\
/ / / / / / Nou�nus o -/'c fir ��\i \� \\�\ \\\ \ \\\ �`
-
y
90
\ \
S
\
6�
3ON33 /
1N3W35tl33OVNItla0
WNO1S nand
."�9.
33,at
9 x
d r
r i 1N3 N
NYANotifs -'
YM1000N�'iwua3'load (l3ixi
Nvda a01 IO )11007
prvYu.3rn v _
8Y'J 31LL%'9ip30
q3 kV Sl�ibrl / / �. -��. ANYa0drv31 - _ \ \ m� 9
l -9S
11x3/3ONYa1N3 rvoHonalsNoo � � � 3r1tl1 NYoaor oz " , - r;, � • �7. .% , / -F-ro, J, -- _ / 1 \ �-e6 r �1fi' 4 i _ � , � _ � I �,, � �• ;
YMV 03OOOM r'YY-YYYY1 ' `- /�" > WAOl"%1g3W35Y3^553VJDY'-, , /�� ' �� �• L/--fY"� Y l i \ \ SZ '�
v . , , � >o~3awYN3lNIYry awe . 1 � e i / (.�) _. � '� , 0 8 �� \ •�\ _A g� ._ _ �r�_.
J �
30NY86n1Slo jo sllwn _�,—� v, 1 ' :�,,, I< / ! /k/ �� 6n�✓" �.i "� u- �� �� �$, {. AaVaPaw31 /. ¢ �� Vv -B0 V / M 1 6' '� • �'
NO1103106d 33W—a—a— \1 ,�-Z '� .''/jPff'n`'}- /j7.[ j �� _-_.. - - - �I I ,� s e� /,^„-MI•l. 6
30N3J Ills—JS-35—JS—j '.'-�� "� NOO�YWii ”" •'� //�% 1; 0011 M3� �-,�'��
AIG M33r0-
\-
W63e 6311Id
�' �" TSyo$lil90 ' � f"� i � C: � la lavaodw3l s 3EpNri13•d. � r 1 4 s � �/' ��,A V '' -`r- � � (
NOUO310ad 13111i y�y,; Q3,ItItl9n511W070 dg / /, lar ' 3dOH .5I J7 ZZ �� A �� 33W \ V A
k,} _ `.✓.va ao0v d, r✓ y51ti ,� r'� z01 -e0 (dlJ
13-uno 3aN3J nlsIll��lir �� /z A0Mer33aoXp.rtYi�13 ens y - ; Y /' / v o s.5�.I. r �'��` V;• C , _ .ffiV - , slrausdr 3sn
i€1srLac L0oN Nm
ne - (( r '�
QN3`J 3•I 'IO2ISN00 N0ISOUR A3zi3wao3 ao MON
A a'�. ( aT` •tawm arm
• �.. ` � ^ " ^ :- / // / �.✓ � .y i 30 NOLLYTItl15Ni 803 \ - � ('dA!) WYO MO3NO C" / \ � ��I
•' .' - /. = / � r' /. � � y � Lv'7^\YJS 315 , \"r _ � � �'" j ���\ �� �- i
n3sn
aa..SS v
K9sH-oz0 oN sW
a-c£'�"�,'. f � � �. J✓' S OCii � � V ,. / n A '\ { - v � � � k �V � 1 / � e �� p
aT 'ziav io s3ua3aoad 3OY /,/ t ; A� 81!
A3a3wao3 ao mo-
- a Nastyvo(
X16
13S 13
MU NI 53H5 .MS. SONMYNO / / ` / / _ (� , / 6 \ A \ � ` , F'd,AU 30N33 1'15 ii v�
MJ1530 03AO8ddY 3H1 0tl S3WM5 1N3NVWa3d 3H1 O1 Z -BS ONV 4-651b3AN00 Yl -7'BOrsJ
3115 3H1 30 30NVN31NNW MO NOJ NOW831N-8
3 d a0J 3111SNOdSMI SI 0NMO '£t �`moi
N0u3ldra0 s _
JO 3LWJI3LLa30 Y 1S—N Ot ONb Nolo— 3115 1- .1 -1-61Z 616 / \`/ W 015 0n8nd , \ N\� //
lb J3V's SNaSm omn,I TY0 '03HSn-S3 N33e S. NOLLtl13O�A N3- 'Z1 � f / / d` f _ � - \ y �� \ `\ � 'h • / j'. '� ('dAl) NQLLJ3lO1,
_ 33N1/3ON3311i5
'1NIOd SIH1 1b 03TV15N1 3B
MM S 53OW30 10a1No0 NOISOa3 1N3N-- 111 SY 34Ve ONLLlnS3a ANV 3\tld � � ' / � % O S ` / / � � / OL t -I / � �\ F ( } \ \ �-,,, \ I \ 1 1 / 1 ILII% ( ��- I• 2'JrC1 \I18
NO a3no0 31YnOmv 3OK08d ON' '013 'ON10N3J ITIS 'SNOLSa MIC AaYbOdW31 3AOW3a 'lt � - \ / /
s�m30 0...H-
10MI03S AaVa0dW3l w0aJ 1N3Wt03S '3A0143a ONV NY3'p 53d'd W31SA5 N31VMWa015
TV NY310 ONl HSnIJ `0313'bw00 aNV 03Z 111 11 Z 3OV15 JO -nM Naw -OI
(13v;i
"032niBVLS ONV O30335 ''-WLYNN d0 1333 9 41- MY 5101 Tlb 3an65V E NCV— 1
'NoubznleVlS aoa 1IVHdSV JO In 1S4w �
3. HlM1 ONON Z i54Li ONs W 0310na1S1400 SAYM - ONO" 35Is 3N015 11Y15N1 '8 i I��I / j/9 •i y / �, � � • �y��, � V ;f V 1 p �� • Z ,
sxv0 a N O
1l NI HLtM a OOONnONo HSn8V1S3 1Shw NaiY NO l £ 38Y 1- S -S 'SAYO 1dOlS, AA - - - `M / ♦ �`, Y \ s V A-� V't V I , , /
03VOtlip n53H011 OW S� M5 NNO SMOOONnOo8D HSn8b1S 035Y3OHAl a0dW3133AVH 11YNl AYMN33NO 1, _ /9 O` 111 19 1N3W35Y3 3OVNItlaO // i / / J`•y�� \�\� \ - \ 1.\ \ r \ \\ , I I ' 1
,ol 3aru J Warns 3<Ya ad .0z
53LLN13V ONIS-10-ON1n N3- NO ONIOVNO JO 3SVNd ANV JO NOLL3I— N31JV 'L n / �'i ��%/// S A`•'•A, \ "-� ( V`- \ �. A A l
30N3�U115
'03033N Sl 53anSY3W 3i NIVINIVW SNYId NO NMOHS
SV -S- --a3Ht0 -/a 'S.- `INZ 'S3.0N30 NOLL0310Nd 131NI m _ � ! / 30Nv8a 0 /yam \ � (��l � � 0 �j \ \�'
H1SN -NI10310ad ONtl 318V011ddV JI 'N3M35 WN015 30 NOUVTV15Nl 3nNLLN0O H _ -��` ' / / '
'gild
NMOHS NOUV 13lIdN0015 3H1 N- IDTOad 3. 30 OND 3Hl lY SY3aV _`` ?\\� Jam_-�' m e / �Sr., / // `!L ,•� / �� ` \\� \ -} 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \p �'- 1
03?NOLL0310Nd 131NIon
HHIMONI £Na0M13-DoN 3OYWNIVaO Xa015dol J. nO031Y15N�01 tl31YM a01S OIS £ 'K '0 �`5 !�&� �y "� % / / �� 1p / (j� LOl-80
\\1Nar�slb NNOIOL �,� a
llY 1N3n10 "5301,30 IONLN00 NOISOa3 AabWWd 3HL 5V Z -BS ONY 4 -OS 3ZnLLn-^3�
315 JO ISM H11M 30VN0 HOWN 01 1NW" JO MIS 1S O 8 S\oz
3NYl Oa HOZ I
S1I-IM WNI 13NNtlHO 1a3A10 ONY Ol 011110d 3 OW3a '(SWtl0 a3ii00) 3NI0 - ,_\ o - I +a '` -� T ��� _ OI �..p,. r_ \ \/ \ b� /• / / l / \V 4-80 \ R \ \ \j ` r .' I II, )' �- 3dV SONY �OB
�N
SnONa3dWi 3TOW3tl 'Q'31tl15Ni 38V 1a311no oNb lmMONW. 305 Na3LSY3 30N0 i £ k3 \ _I �Fn �` \ i � ` y� -�°�•� / � / �,� ` � � �� �® � \ Og\ � 1g� `� { �� �\ 7, (_ � \ � � II I II \ I (
-r .S.. arm IN3n1110 .O£ Na3tsv3 io `� �� � �'• � �' - � / �� '� \ t _ l I I
NO1Yi1Y15Ni ONtl 1N3W30Yid tlOJ MO11Y OL 1tl311fp .0£ M3N Dl W13N15 la?AIO £ £
1 l TVMONVA ONV la3Al(Y0 -_ _ _ - i- �� 1 ���� •""� \ %'C�jy`= per` 0$ ��i �`O1P _ 1 Q'' �BKNVONOC' Q IA-� `A
.o£ Na3<svi 3w. WA monr of £-03 No Gao3LYOICNIWw sY wb0 tlM Hlm£
Na315tl3 3H1 JO NO—SNI Md 1nOH1 W 3lBIS50d Sl VgnW 5b 30VNO Ol 53dO15 -� m `.� \" k3
ONWB ONY a33419N3 NJINH031030 3Ht -n 030NSI 1-a SV 2 M31 3HS 30NONNI ! \
3OI5 iS3M 3H1 HLV3 O3Ttl15Ni SIN 33N A£ M3N 3N1 30N0 4'£
JNSSOW XV3a1S 1N3NtlwN3d JO NOLLYlVISNI 'E \ \ / "1^ 1� f es- !"` � �-
1-iS96 H1w O311Y1SN1 5.30N30 10a1N00 N050a3 35n ONV I-NIVW Ol 3nN N00
'S30w30 353H1 IN NI Ol ANVSS303N SV "NO NY310 'SI -d Q3AOaddV Z'3JFI5 3N1 - -- 1 �S[�d �" Q•"i - � x 'e\` \ �, �_ '�_ ` _ L 1 _ ) \
AIIWVJ 3PJNI5_35 Po '}�_ ' /
NO NMOMS
Sy 53an5V3w N3H10 a0/nrm 'ON10N33 1115 'srvol$a3nla ANYa0dW31 TY15Ni 'L NO SIS �_ r.\ \`
n0 -OW 'nNINn '
1.1 -t8 -££LO ON Nld / A[� ry,' NSC .�. \�, b h\ / X11\ \ \ I I• I�, -'
'i30Nna 0NY1 03OON30 .. 031 W.1 I 6 \ \ I\
130 ION 5300 mmona vwN1 ORW.SN'OO A^M.3N 3Nn5SV Cl NOLLO310ad 31NYNd315 8 M3aONV I "'' •N{` 1'
13'INI
OW
3ON3 116 Hl. O31O310dd SI 13OYiS JO N31WW1 3N— Z 3OV15
Ain maws
n
-od ONw0z
'ON NW
yadv0vn ON-ONHi3e n 1-1.b :ONINoz w i� �I ✓, l V A A183Wa0.1 ao MON
_
SL £t A`rfl� ©rrvOrN NW
i )
i
\
/ / / / / / Nou�nus o -/'c fir ��\i \� \\�\ \\\ \ \\\ �`

NOLLD[IH.LSNOD Nod - 5SI VJQ W10
d
KOb =gam I
ON 06 Oi 0 OY
a)v�s �urdeu�
Z 3ovls to 3AOW sNaOM anend WOad —AdY MR 'OZ
DNIOON3 SNIo39 YAW
3. 3I SNISVB I. -S MV O1NI SMIlo01131N1 tV 03a8103N 38 Atlw SNIVNA 34015 'BI
sAvo
NVON-3 4t NI MA d3A0DONOOND H -VISA 1SOW a Y11 NO t:£ ANY IVW. 53403
'-Q Q NVaN31V3 L NIH14M (Moll) 53N.Z SM. IFFIV. HDI. ONY I:£ NVM 43d331S
S3d015 030VMD 'S3HO11O ONV S—S NO N—ONOOdo ISn8VI53 '03YAO AIINVa0dw31
3AYH S3LLNLL3V ANIBAOISIO-ONVI MW NO ONIOVIO d0 T3DVZ d0 NOuO,tnoo NAIjV '9t
"NV11 ONIOVW CIA— 3H1 HIMI 3DNVONOODV NI MIS AM
30 3oNVAN.S'a 30 S ,Nn AM NIM.. 11NO WVAD M.N1 ONS 'DNI88nND 'DN1AV3tD INDIA 'LI
'iI-o "0' d0 A"OU".0
NIV180 01 N0033dSNI MIS -NO NV a03 'LZ4£-642-Bte IV d3Y1S SNaoM OnBnd
X3dV -0 NAM ON, S30N30 ONWdtlal 1N3WIO35 O1 NMOHS SV SNOtSa3NO Mtl15NI '91
SAO 30 AUK MVISM 01 AaV5S3D3N SY A1NO — 'SNV'Id o]AOSAdtl
AHL NO NMOHS SY S38nSV3W d3MO MVISIN "Y -8S ONY '£-9S 'Z -SS 'I -9S Mtl1SNI Si
'SStla18 3lIS
110 3IVIr IOYd M MA AO NI S—A! AHI NO 33IVDIONI SY —A -31 Wats MVISNI '41
Z 3SVHd 3. NO NIa38 NVO N00onLSN00
380338 03TVISNi 38 1- 1a3A1(YD X09 SS31WO1108 AHL 'Z ASYHd O1Nt SS333V
SV 1a3A1110 AM mnLLn oNV oNISSONO mYSMS ANVa0dW3t AK 3AOW3a '30YNA 1VM3
O1 IHOnONe Si 1a IM 3H1 30 306 NINON 3X1 SY 'ON -D M -S 'i-AaIOSIanr-NON
'MOTH WOad ANY SNOLLIONOO ASO DNItl00 3D- A- MVHS NNOM MY 'Z 3SYHd .1M
SS3OOV MOTV 01 30vNa'IVIVA 01 D -OW oNINB ONV 1-0 X08 Ssm—o8 MVLSM it
'SNOLLVO.W. X3dV d0 NMOI. aid ONISSONO NV3NIS —ONAM MV1SIN 'ZI
'Z 3SVHd eOl ONISSONO .3.S AHL 30 NO-NISNOD AHL NOd VINY
ONIOVIS AWAOAHM V SY 3A83S 01 -VA NIYW3a MYHS 13SVHd AD oY ONY 6£ 5101 "It
'S3wLL MV 1V MIS NO Al1NANIHONd IMa3d DNIOVaa ANI 1SOd MVM a01-1,00 'OI
'3oN3n03S NOLLonNISNOO AM NI 03MnD3H -N NOLLDONLSNOO-3ad
N3H10 ANV NO. 3IINVd3l SI DNO- SIH! 53uInLLDV ONIOYND ANY 01 NOWd
i9f£-6YZ-6t6 IV (N.,8 AOna) SN..O3 SNI ONIMIM M. DNLL33W NOLLDn-NOD-3Nd
V —AN, 'SNDILDANISM ONIQIins A8 03(651 ow @M31A3a SI 11— DNIOVao V 3DNO '6
"(NOSNIO SNWo3ASNI 5NIM108 Woad NIV190) NOLLVOnddV 11WN3d ONIOYaO A-Pl0o H
'oM)M,1 11. M. SINVNOAH 3X13 MV ONOONY 3ONVNv31D
£ NIVINltlw 3ON3d 11S ONY 'SNOISa3A10 ANVIONAM 3ONVMN3 N(LLOINISNOO MVISNI 'L
IWS3ad
38 MVHS 3ASVIN3 WA8 S,8MNIDN3 0NY 'HO1DVNINO3 '3ALLVIKIS3ad3a S83NM0
'3JV1S NMOL H3N10 ONV SA01D3dSM ONAMNON3 MM ONLL33W 1101130HISNOO-3Nd
V M -HOS 'OL -642-816 1V NOSNA3 SMAN3S 0'1313 DNIN33NON3 AHI HDOONM '9
'LZYF-BYZ-6l6 IV AAVs sNNOM Dmnd NOW SMMV3W
10a1N0o NOISON3 ONY NOLLV1NAAIGAS a04 WAOaddV NVId A NMIP V IMM38 '8
'ANIS SNNOM
Onnd 01 lYAOaddtl ONVMa03 MR oNINNYid SON -314 NONOMONd 30 4Ou03ASN1
WNlf V MIA 9Z4£-6YZ-616 1V DNINNVId MVO '03NIn03N 38 AYW IVM 53-V3w
NOLLOMO84 NAIMO ANV NO/ONY 'SNDIS 'ONION3d NO1103104d 33X1 O3AONddV TVISNI '4
'SNO.YDOI ONIDN3d NOLLO310ad 33x1 HOA 1tlA0addV IS3(W38 01
9ZK-642-616 1V a3Dt110 AON-NOD ONINOZ IN3w1NVd30 ONINNVId — Ntl IOYINOO Z
SNwn WILDRONNI AM DW ONV
'SY3aY NIMOAL ad 33X1 'sNAAAn8 SIN3w3SV3 'sMYM Al .., AV, NO13AN. V 3AVH 'Z
(1N3111aVd30 SNINNYId
WONd NN190) NOLLtlDnddtl 11W83d NOLLtlMV1SNi DNDN3d NOLLO310a4/MM 1nO MU 'I
SGWONV1S Nouom1SN00 ONY \. r
N01S30 0NRi33NIDN3 X3dV 30 NM01
1N38NnO 3H1 H11M 30NVO8000V ► e a ) 9 S1°
NI 38 IIVHS NOI10nNISN00 ITV ii\ a o a • —
S31oN kinin 1! a `
-. �1 0 ll V•
(INV 30VNIVNO W2101S 40NIOV80 3115 ! >
'103r08d ITV NO3 Z-0 133HS 335
! \dvadla 9 ssrl� a±a 1 S
V £0'9l = V32JV 039LIn1510 Z 3SVHd 1V101 ! (.dA1J, 3J83d�x =1s
OV 2 r6Z = V3NV MIS 1V101 / � NouD3load 33!(L
:V-LVa 3115
! \ ('dAI�3DN33 L� - _ Y / J,•r \I ' 6 \\ \ � ,
s 3
(� ! Wa38/H0110\ • NNN0 340 ` 15 (318V1 AaVWWnS 33S) 6
! NO15a3N0 A8YNOAN31 .91 AaVa0dN31 AU NOLLD310ad
Z-ClJ \ l IV -III —.dw31 j
\ ("AAS) TWO
\ \ .__ --_ 31D3H0�N1MOdW31 �-_ _-
\ \ • 31IdNAOJs llosdol/llos
d0 NOLLY00l 31tlriIXOtldaV' � \'1' Ld +f10 SVM
\
ty� �
Nou�31cac33
� R'(�YV3 31Di116 :35n•� - •" k. A-
IS N3d0 03NIV1NIVW VOH
NWS \
oNffoa'I '10HINo0 Noisoaa
oN650ao
wV3l0S d0 NWIsOI.OL/N00
aQ3 3lId-m 11 VNIXO. W5 .
AO NOLLSDOI 31YrYIXOaddtl
3DN3d 1115-��•
soil \,— F, \
A
lld LIOHSYM
� NO0a1 313lYJNOD
"NO11Jna15NOO Z 3SYHd do
—A AM - OVOa SNN31
Ol0 vIn AUS 3. NMN3 MYNS
Ot3dVa1 NOLLDna1SNOD 1W
.0/3DNVNW3 N=n-N0o
1-0 OAVMAW31
.1 SSVNd NO NID38 - NOILDn61SN.
380438 03MVLSNi 38 IS'. —n0
'ONISsOaD WY3iu5 d0 N- --1400
—Nod 3DN3n035 1Oa00aLSN0D 335
11X3/3ONVN1N3 NOLLDIIHISNOO
6yNoda eUlo9 aaul lia uo sI.P1eP oeS y
lPyr a.ogP nt.Ht 'w+.q lP ePl eto of ac09
eyl wwl ly6 cy oa mJ .(uo uo}.ad sallow ap15 t
caloN
HO11C NOISa3n10
tl/N
ONVL'3M
V/N
Y/N
(NI) +olawPO +asa
V/N
Y/N
V9NV a3000M
OSZ
V381
rr
30NYBNn1510 30 simn
007
NOLLVAN3SNOO 301nOS3N
L
t
m—m
OLO'4l
OSZ'L
3ON33 NOLL0310Nd 33d1
—M—Nl—dl-
096'9
(,13) ".N -,V _-s }uawlpe5
30X331115
—dS—dS--35--
wvldeoo 13
9 '94
-'S
(,1d) ImI-A ewnloA --11
9L
6���11]]y]yl
wa0 103H5
fiLZ
AVMGGO13
(13) 1.16yal dal Idol
iTun0 30N33 1115
oNffoa'I '10HINo0 Noisoaa
oN650ao
wV3l0S d0 NWIsOI.OL/N00
aQ3 3lId-m 11 VNIXO. W5 .
AO NOLLSDOI 31YrYIXOaddtl
3DN3d 1115-��•
soil \,— F, \
A
lld LIOHSYM
� NO0a1 313lYJNOD
"NO11Jna15NOO Z 3SYHd do
—A AM - OVOa SNN31
Ol0 vIn AUS 3. NMN3 MYNS
Ot3dVa1 NOLLDna1SNOD 1W
.0/3DNVNW3 N=n-N0o
1-0 OAVMAW31
.1 SSVNd NO NID38 - NOILDn61SN.
380438 03MVLSNi 38 IS'. —n0
'ONISsOaD WY3iu5 d0 N- --1400
—Nod 3DN3n035 1Oa00aLSN0D 335
/ ('dAl) N. 115-1
AYd�dW 8 SSVIO �� y( _
ost >vs v`s -
'� / la 13llfm n �` � ♦ /
31BY3 AA��1NYWWWn5 `�
A 10 vd d \ I
\ � \�_� (319Y1 Aab�iwrls 335) _ \ ♦ _
S3131V8 aro0 \ _ \ \ \ I d �( dAl) 38'33 \ @ \ \
�fdw NIVNO 3403
aN ID NOZ I � . 1 ( .S!\ANMOdW31
T GH)Y-69-z£�o roti Nld ; A V i \ /• A� // A1� �� 1' V 1
IN2.- ao MON �. / + I(9-4133 335) \\ (dAi) NM1'0 � _ \ // \ _
\ I i
� I
• •\ \mo 111, Ap- Asn I.3NSY9 NJ1dvD \ ND3HD 1NtlaoaW3l -'—'_A 'l�� \ ` I �\
NJNVNOZ //rrff„
89Z9-68-ZfLO ON
NtA ���y'�►ate \
HOONHDS —Hot. A MSCI-!' \
'O3L31dW00 30NO 03HOi(1W 0NV 030335 38 AiN3wao3 NO mor;//%�� � \� I �� 1. ��% /s/—m.�_s,_—m—_� / \ ���\� k 1 �♦
IIVHS Slid X0015 3H1 'V£ NVHl 831V21O ON S3dOlS 3AVH \ \�
IIVHS (INV 1HEIGH NI ,OZ 0330X3 lON llVHS 311d N001S •i Int`` (�,d�{AA,1l) >`� .�// __ _ \ `` -,_I_ V a
I 1
NVI` \
13Hvt�MOaor
1
AIN
2NSN31 AB QUO NVOR33WV H121014 - OVNa N33yO2DNLLsa3-�/" 1 _ i Z_
iVNO3 03AO6ddV b0 OS 105 OVNr S£0' l=Z .0'Z y-01
/ J \
a3Nn IVNI0n119N01 53015 W011o"
!
,d aae adoya +gldaul £
6yNoda eUlo9 aaul lia uo sI.P1eP oeS y
lPyr a.ogP nt.Ht 'w+.q lP ePl eto of ac09
eyl wwl ly6 cy oa mJ .(uo uo}.ad sallow ap15 t
caloN
V/N
tl/N
(NI) m1awP0 lauo8
V/N
Y/N
(NI) +olawPO +asa
V/N
Y/N
Naga Nalololi iW
OSZ
o5l -
(NI) e'S .-o -NS
OS'Z
007
(NI) ezls ..."S
L
t
amwwly5 3o mgwnN
OLO'4l
OSZ'L
(ala) P,no+d outl eaoyn5 luewlpaS
098'£1
096'9
(,13) ".N -,V _-s }uawlpe5
068'42
-,z
(<y{) pm, .— e6oiols
9 '94
-'S
(,1d) ImI-A ewnloA --11
9L
IL
(13) NMX. -,I Jo dol
fiLZ
9ZI
(13) 1.16yal dal Idol
W) wN. )o tol..
9Z
ZI
(Li) OS- 1-1lIdS
AtN 0'£
AIH Of
eatlo6 api5
Z
Z (1d)
1..NdS APVa _ to lae-0 of Vltleo
Y/N
V/N
(13) +gala lP 188-0 of 41daO
S"I
L"t
(Vltleo SuawlPeS wPu) P+eogaa+d
414-0 1w -S
S.
00'8£(
(ld) ua0..A wolta8
LZ'SZ
Z9'£t
(SAD) SZO �oLd
CZ'4
Eft
('DY) -V pa—Io
L4'L
L8'f
(yy) oa+V ..-0
Z -8S
I_.s
01 11NI AVAINO3S
MAN, NO- dYal/N_. SAN.- A_8oAIYM
v
,,avwwnS NISVO 1N3W103S
(SINOZ
MOH Q. Sa313NiAAN
a0d Id3OX3) 3N.
S VO 4t
I4 NYNt a3llVi3
SAAOIS MR
'NV AAMO MY
MDNM NI 1333a3LLVl3
OS — a31tl3ND
S3NO1S NO3 SlbO-L
SAVO 41
NO IT 53dO1S
CAROM, 3A,
SAtlO 41 l Z NNLL
N3d3315 ION ANY 0.
HLDN3l NI 5631 a0
.01 3W 53-s It
SAVO G
l £ —
8343315 53dOlS
,N
ANON
SAtlO L
9NOZ (NAM)
a31tlM AMNn0 rplH
ANON
51r0L
53403 ONY
SIQ o313WIM5
3,,N
'5M,3X10 Na3d
,.
SNOad3DX3 3WSNf
3wLL NOLLVZn8N1S
3wvNi 3wLL
NOLLYJl11BY1s
NOI1VZn19V1S
NOudiNUs.
V3aY ills
ONnoNo
/ ('dAl) N. 115-1
AYd�dW 8 SSVIO �� y( _
ost >vs v`s -
'� / la 13llfm n �` � ♦ /
31BY3 AA��1NYWWWn5 `�
A 10 vd d \ I
\ � \�_� (319Y1 Aab�iwrls 335) _ \ ♦ _
S3131V8 aro0 \ _ \ \ \ I d �( dAl) 38'33 \ @ \ \
�fdw NIVNO 3403
aN ID NOZ I � . 1 ( .S!\ANMOdW31
T GH)Y-69-z£�o roti Nld ; A V i \ /• A� // A1� �� 1' V 1
IN2.- ao MON �. / + I(9-4133 335) \\ (dAi) NM1'0 � _ \ // \ _
\ I i
� I
• •\ \mo 111, Ap- Asn I.3NSY9 NJ1dvD \ ND3HD 1NtlaoaW3l -'—'_A 'l�� \ ` I �\
NJNVNOZ //rrff„
89Z9-68-ZfLO ON
NtA ���y'�►ate \
HOONHDS —Hot. A MSCI-!' \
'O3L31dW00 30NO 03HOi(1W 0NV 030335 38 AiN3wao3 NO mor;//%�� � \� I �� 1. ��% /s/—m.�_s,_—m—_� / \ ���\� k 1 �♦
IIVHS Slid X0015 3H1 'V£ NVHl 831V21O ON S3dOlS 3AVH \ \�
IIVHS (INV 1HEIGH NI ,OZ 0330X3 lON llVHS 311d N001S •i Int`` (�,d�{AA,1l) >`� .�// __ _ \ `` -,_I_ V a
I 1
NVI` \
13Hvt�MOaor
1
AIN
2NSN31 AB QUO NVOR33WV H121014 - OVNa N33yO2DNLLsa3-�/" 1 _ i Z_
iVNO3 03AO6ddV b0 OS 105 OVNr S£0' l=Z .0'Z y-01
/ J \
a3Nn IVNI0n119N01 53015 W011o"
!
) A1MV3 �gyNN� t"" I � _ � -_
ANVWW(15 H0110 NOISN3N0 AiiVNOdW31L099-69-E£ k, Id. '' , %' / ('dW A—
N (di.() a3dine•
/I� / OYZI 'Dd`¢•�i -� tl�t' NOua310a2 3381 / 8.13dAt ,Ol -' - _ >!-...
OY9
ar S 13NN3N 53�M+D ���
a
NOt103S
) A1MV3 �gyNN� t"" I � _ � -_
ANVWW(15 H0110 NOISN3N0 AiiVNOdW31L099-69-E£ k, Id. '' , %' / ('dW A—
N (di.() a3dine•
/I� / OYZI 'Dd`¢•�i -� tl�t' NOua310a2 3381 / 8.13dAt ,Ol -' - _ >!-...
OY9
ar S 13NN3N 53�M+D ���
a

OF FORMERL
xrLLMM e�IR o BIT-coDH�tr_..—._._\ `s � � EXISTING
?u1LN0a]32 BB 538 \.._ T RN HOLLOW
O T ■� TIRJ V
NOW OR FORMERLY ��,\ / � j __ T"RN 11NLLO IIT ]11111 V li
�\ - _ _ - _- I// ' ^O � / 1}� �
PIN N .0]32 88=1d81 _ / L / j
r ZONING: RR �-� / (80' i9Ip1'H PUBLIC R�W�
1 1;
NOW OR FORMERLY 'I i ' ^ `� / --Z � _ �, / NOW OR fORYERLY / , 6 �/ �S SHEETi�-IB� a
WND CALF F MARL' HAlI ♦ /� '° w <_ _ -+ USE: SINGLE FAMILY �,\ \ / / /
JOHN h ALARA BABAi /
mN NO 0]32 88 4719 /t - -��_\ - _ P� %
_ IN LA0. 0732-08-0285 i
_
ZONING: "A.,
R\�� 29NIN0'RR
USE: SINCI[ FAMILY /--_ '+-� - - luse'SINGLE
m --`OR FORMERL
TREE`rRaTEcnoN i<
NG FI
PUFFER (TYPEA.) / / / i _-(hQ�. -_-/ EARRMlDE N' 20NING RR
ni'P - e?r-=mac'--\ ' % -- - _--/ (SEE o>� � I i �- / usE sw -FaGnY
11
PI — .--g.s - DcmR I ) /
I m W SHEETS)m
EE S /
/-'(z• Q ooxN REMAw rw
% <��-_/1
ouRnm LnMsrRM ------
77-
POND
, POND TO RE
f .� _
DRAINED �/ A ' CONS[RVCIION ENTRANCE/IXR -�'Q��
(SEE SHEET SW -1 6 IS diY TO BE USED FDR��� -� / QTS SKIMM CEVICE
11 FOR POND SILT FENCE DYP.) WATER MAN CONSfftUC110N R`ER'I�UNE 'fR� PROTECTION qTr ED TO RISER /
BCH¢
I 0 ! / \ ALOND THORN HOLLOW DR. / FEN (ATj� BMREI_ SEE SNV�NPRt'
%� i TABLE STIEET EC -2 /
\ I
60 '4T
I_
ZZ z
I f
1
,
t
s
i
r
COIR BbtfltS
e T
20' imp @
A® Burrow
i_�D,�- _ s- / / SB -4a
%� ��` - AV �/??--�� s4 (SEE SUMMARY TABLE) T
p
,y
llFDE 0,P)
I
20 rowN DF TA"3
`\ \gym-\ -- \ �,, , , �t \� ,
PE%iUBUE EASEMENT y, \ E -.\ • , , , \\ - TELPoRA�I' DNERSIDN TEMPO 18'
RPFI
%_--iliiClTY /
DRNN (TYP.)' i �l �C ♦ ./
CA ♦ TEMDAMPoaAkr CHECK / W /
e SILT FENCE o Ar DISSIPAKTR
sBAP
LLT FENCE (TP.) _ rELPORPRY DNERSION / A1� At1 Low POINTS (TIP. IdINIIMNA D�IMSENSB'IONR9
♦A�� 'rEMPowaY/rz'
\ ° ��'� \ \ SLOPE ARNn (Tw.)
i TD -2-- \ -� \ �\ , .-I- § -as °-° mai`
, 1EMPORARY ONER51 �, I - , T \ mal / \ SB -3 SKIMMER DEVICE SILJ�FENCE 01T�.)
DDCH/BERM SEE / \ / °� / SEE sOMMARY TAB1�
t- _SUMMARY 5H--
TABLE
ON
TEMPORARY D RBON -(SEE SUMMARY'TABI.E) - / -._-_SHEEL--
�� ♦ / / 1 \ A / � � IoT=p/=ERM. .) M _.. _ _
TEL 12 rrr-+'�' _ _ - / /l4,
`, / /� / Y \ \` \� ✓" `\ s� 1411
� .(�� aD FO77
RMERLY
nZ
\ _
TREE PROTECTION - - 11HFr �l PIN
✓' \� ` f , TION . - q -
- \ 1 a'� zoNmc ExEMr=r / c A-
/ 5'W . 5 1.5_0 oe (n'Pd� usEwnr..wt _ wl�
cGCSs B RIPRAP PAD
.��/ / \\ F 'l \ �`` SRT FENC OUttET AT /� 81°;�y"0�' 32•u %� /`C� /
%/ \ W / / i COIR H4r%LEi M W P.
SEDIMENT BASIN SUMMARY
TEMPORARY SKIMMER BASIN/1RAP
DESIGN TABLE
SECTION
SEIIHENT TRAP ID
SB -3
S8-
-- Arev (AC.)
1.37
21.29
Dkturbed Area (ACJ
1.37
11.56
E- D25 (C!S)
4.65
68.84
Bottom Eewt on (FT)
330
332
Sediment Deplh (F1)
2.0
3.9
FreaSoord 0- Sediment D,Ih)
1.5
2.1
pepth to Creel W BI- (IT)
N/A
3.9
Depth to Creel of R ­ ,y Spillway (FT)
2.0
B
Sltle Sopea
2.0 H:1V
30 H:1V
sp0 say Length (FT)
10
20
Height of Berm (FT)
3.5
6
Top o1 Tr Length (FT)
99
N/A
TW of Trap Width (FT)
39
N/A
Storage Volume R-lred (FT')
T..2
41,616
Stange volume P,o d. (FT)
5,170
12%-
--t S.- Area -(d (FTs)
2,960
37,-
.6-1 Surface Neo Prov'tl (Fi'J
3,070
37,840
Number of Skimmers
1
1
SkNnmar Size (IN)
2100
400
a.- 0,11- - (IN)
1150
3.5
Mtl-Flotation Block
N/A
N/A
Bi- Diameter (IN)
N/A
I N/A
Bartel Dbmeta (IN)
Nolen:
L Side elopes pertain only IP, Na -1-1 height
base to Ne top of Dam, 2N:1V above lhot.
Trwn the
2. See datalla on apt Ince baMe spacing.
3. Irregular ahope -ace plan
S q/ --- - i gym/ ` - -- \ �\1 \ 5eEgw i / AP / .Y �`$ � -1 f _'_ - " , / --
% r�
O / ALL Low POINrs�TYA. �� _ -
SILT cET AT A _ _ zoN€zuAKe� _ - J I do tterEMA I/�� •- ,./'�-�-/--� _ - /'� / /
�,��L/__
i 090
UFFER / _ i �' . 1 t aCta
%
N�_�-� - ♦ - s _ - ♦�� 9Z£�`''\-Y(,1%UiIIXTY EASEMENT
- �-E� �1�' ) _
_ - - SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL PROJECT,
SITE, GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND k
- s UTILITY NOTES
0 / • i
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN�
° ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
TOWN OF APEX ENGINEERING DESIGN !�
AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SITE DATA:
TOTAL SITE AREA = 29.13 AC
TOTAL PHASE 2 DISTURBED AREA = 16.03 A
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH SUMMARY
SILT FENCE OUTLET
SECTION
CHANNEL #LINER
BOTTOM
SIDES LONGITUDINAL
SILTFENCE
—TP—TP —1P—
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
(FT)
(FT/FT)
�J
TD -3
20'
2:7 .03
"NAG C125 OR APPROVED EOUAL
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
'IIIIIIIII'
SILT FENCE OUTLET
INLET PROTECTION
FILTER BERM
CHECK DAM
—SF—SF—SF—
SILTFENCE
—TP—TP —1P—
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
—LD —LD
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
�J
WOODED AREA
�)�l�Ma•�i
DIIERS'ON DITCH
�"
CDNS (RUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
ROODWAY
FLOODPLAIN
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
AREA
WETLAND
HOA MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 40 BC
1 inch = 40 R.
FINAL. DRAWING - RELEASED ROP CONSTRUCTION
IgA
�N
N�N
O
U
lz-
tv` CARP(
=oe'�FSS7
�, 2266
I
z
O
a � �
U
Z'
Oz Co "g.
W CQ
a a
d ?
Z Z U -0
a �wxwH
6a
F �4aE-
>c7z OF
�x��;xz
w �,xwo
V
N
(,a IOi 0
0
oz gw
O � 0
N z
^ W
W
KHH-15000
NNH15000-PH2-EC1
DLP
CGH
1"=40'
04-01-2016
........ EO -2
'J MCADAMs

OR
= _ _ — . ` CH4�LE5 ENH F LY 5 JR
_ y
KW
\ ■ Z i ` �s
1
I �� — — TYPE,'B ft , �6RK1L PG. 1240
�, R`Q73p_
RR_5601
% AMITY /
/70
(SEE SUMMARY TABLE)
OR FORMERLY
\ \ \ ""'A" INLET / -� �O'QEt &MICHELLE $CRNOOR
I PRIVATE GRAIN GE `ltl 6 \ l TIN NO. 0732-89-62% NOW OR FORMERLY
EASEMENT n I , ZONMG:" y. DANIEL MARTIN
use SINGLE FAMILY , �V �`. PIN N0. 0732-69 40Q
�/ CARTON BASK�IS' ZONING' RR
\ -
\ (sEE sN�r
L zD'�Ruc STORM
DRAINAGE EA6EMENT
PROTECTION -4360 / / \\ 4•vFp 1
7 7��
TREEI POTECZ014 �� 7
I �- Bu.T FENCE � �>rs.A�� --� -- �- - ��•_ _. _- — — - FENc� (mP_) V A J
I ♦ !,,: i �� fttA.
��< \ )\ \V /;,T ,68 4376
437A
2•1
Ai\8 H✓s4
T/
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE — STAGE 2
t. STAGE 2 ASSURE PERIMETER OF STAGE 1 IS PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE AND INLET
PROTECTION TO ASSURE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED INFRPSTRJCNRE DOES NOT GET
INUNDATED WITH DENUDED LAND RUNOFF
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENCING. AND/OR OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON
THE STAGE -2 APPROVED PLANS CLEAR ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THESE
DEVICES CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN AND USE EROSO4 CONTROL DEVICES INSTALLED WITH
5789E_L MAINTAIN A 3' CLEARANCE AROUND ANY FIRE HYDRANTS WITH SILT FENCING.
3. UTILIZE SB -1 AND SB -4 AS THE PRIMARY EROSION CONTROL DEMCES, DIVERT ALL
STORMWATER TO INSTALLED STORM DRAINAGE NETWORK WTH INLET PROTECTION.
4. AS ORANGE OAK LANE IS BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE, RESHAPE SS -2 TO ALLOW FOR A
3.25:1 SLOPE FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY OF ORANGE OAK LANE
5. STOCKPILE SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF TOPSOIL i0 COVER 3 INCHES OVER LANDSCAPED
AREAS AT THE END OF THE PROJECT WITHIN THE STOCKPILE LOCATION SHOWN.
6, CONTINUE INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWER. IF APPLICABLE, AND PROTECT INL£15 WITi
INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SEDIMENT GEVICES, AND/OR OTHER APPROVED MEASURES AS
SHOWN ON PLANS. MAINTAIN S6# MEASURES AS NEEDED.
7, AFTER COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING OR WHEN LAND—DISTURBING ACTiNTES
HAVE TEMPORARILY CEASED, ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER ON "ALES AND DITCHES
GRADED SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 AND HIGH QIALITY WATER ZONES (HOW) WITHIN 7
CALENDAR DAYS SLOPES THAT ARE 3:1 OR FLATTER MUST ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER
— IN 14 CALENDAR DAYS
8. INSTALL STONE BASE ALONG ROADWAYS CONSTRUCTED WRING STAGE -2 ALONG WITH THE
FIRST UFT OF ASPHALT FOR STABILIZATION.
9. ASSURE ALL LOTS ARE MiTHIN 6 FEET CG FINAL GRADE, SEEPED AND STABIUZEO,
10 WHEN ALL OF STAGE 2 IS STABILIZED AND COMPLETED, FLUSH AND CLEAN ALL
STORMWATER SYSTEM PIPES. CLEAN ANO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
HOLDING DEVICES.
11. REMOVE TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS, SILT FENONG, ETC. AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE COVER OR
PAVE ANY RESULTING BARE AREAS. ALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL DE—S SHOULD
SE INSTALLED AT THIS PONT.
12 WHEN VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. CALL PUBLIC WORKS STAFF AT
919-249-3427 FOR FINAL SITE INSPECTION AND TO REQUEST A CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLETION.
13. OYMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE OF THE SITE.
14. CONVERT SB -4 TO THE PERMANENT SWARF PER THE APPROVED DESIGN BRAWNGS 'SW
SHEETS IN THE SET.
maw
NJ
y
r \ 1
IEMPoRMY
C -A `�� \ 1
PROTECTION 1
G� OAK -LANE -- — — f -- " 78
� ca -4 �
SILT FENCE a
� To2d4Run INS'
61
tnoN CTrn.> ' \
TEMPORIRI DN—ION 60 _ _ ce 41a - - _ __ \ -�-- I w
TGO N H/BERM.
FLOOD\y CB -42
a \I
( CCCNNSTRUUCTON \
SEQUENCE) `A 59 3444
5 T B \\\ I I.
340 W
SIL
�T FENCE 1
rROE,PRorEGnoN 1 SITE DATA:
$ �'.,� T — A FENCE pYP.1 ■
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
111111111- SILT FENCE OUTLET
FLOODWAY
L L
< i INLET PROTECTION
LLJ
Lel
FLOODPLAIN
CHECK DAM
I
RESOURCE CONSERVATON
—�—g—�— SILT FENCE
AREA
—TP—IP—TP— TREE PROTECTION FENCE
00— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
WETLANC
I.AJ�l`l�h.l�l WOODED AREA \
Dole
HOA MAINTAINED OPEN SPACE
.p ®►®O sk.®1. DIVERSION DITCH L..
VII
osvx° _de ., _ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
pate
Thesignatures affixetl below ce!tify that this sheet has been revi wetl and approved solely per
the ce.iflc A,o signed on
the cover sheet of
In— construction plans.
CM—Engineering
Date
I
Public Works—Env, Programs
Date
CM—Transportapan
pate
Date
Planning
I CM—Building Inspections
Dole
Planning—Transportetlon
Date
Public Works—Water/Sewer
pate
Fire
Date
Dote
Publk Works—Electric
Uote
Parks, Recreation & Cu:tural Res.
Public Works—S&E
Oate
FINAL DRAWING — RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

M
fill
18 21M
i 2 86
g
En P4 -CC I CD
w
>1 OR,
z
Z ozu
0 E-
co
U)
z
000
0
P-4
0
z
0
C11
PRW- KHH-15000
KHH15DDD-7-,.
DLP
CGH
04-01-2016
EC -4
99 MCADAMS

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR CROSSING ALONG RED POINTE DRIVE
1. CONSTRUCT STREAM DIVERSION CHANNEL FOR THE PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING.
12.1 EXCAVATE THE DIVERSION CHANNEL WITHOUT DISTURBING THE EXISTING CHANNEL.
12.2 PLACE P550 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) LINER IN THE EXCAVATED PORTION OF THE DIVERSION
CHANNEL WITH A MINIMUM OF 4' OF MATERIAL OVERLAPPING THE CHANNEL BANKS. SECURE THE
OVERLAPPED MATERIAL USING AT LEAST 12" OF FILL MATERIAL.
12.3 CONNECT THE DOWNSTREAM DIVERSION CHANNEL INTO THE DOWNSTREAM EXISTING CHANNEL AND SECURE
THE P550 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) LINER AT THE CONNECTION.
12.4 CONNECT THE UPSTREAM DIVERSION CHANNEL INTO THE UPSTREAM EXISTING CHANNEL AND SECURE THE
P550 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) LINER AT THE CONNECTION.
12.5 CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE (COFFER DAM) IN THE EXISTING CHANNEL AT THE UPSTREAM SIDE TO
DIVERT FLOW INTO THE DIVERSION CHANNEL.
12.6 CONSTRUCT AN IMPERVIOUS DIKE (COFFER DAM) IN THE EXISTING CHANNEL AT THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE TO
ISOLATE THE WORK AREA.
2. CONSTRUCT (1) 36" RCP PROPOSED CULVERT AT ROAD CROSSING. THE RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PAD SHALL BE
INSTALLED FLUSH WITH EXISTING GRADE. ALL WORK SHALL TAKE PLACE DURING DRY CONDITIONS AND FROM
HIGH, NON—JURISDICTIONAL, STABLE GROUND. COFFER DAMS AND A TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL WILL BE
UTILIZED TO CONSTRUCT ROAD CROSSING SO WORK CAN BE PERFORMED IN DRY CONDITIONS.
3. BEGGING CONSTRUCTION OF FLARED END WALL ALONG THE DOWN STREAM SOUTHERN SIDE AS INDICATED ON
EC -4
1. INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING:
3.1 ONCE T`rIE NEW 36" CULVERT IS INSTALLED WITH THE SOUTH SIDE
WNGWAL LS, BACKFILL AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
AND BRING SLOPES TO GRADE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE
INSTALLATION OF THE EASTERN WINGWALL.
12: MOVE CHER DAM AS INDICATED ON EC -4 TO ALLOW FOR THE
NORTHERN 36" AND 42" CULVERT AND WaINGWALL INSTALLATION.
3.3 DIVERT STREAM INTO SOUTHERN 36" CULVERT TO ALLOW FOR THE
PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF THE NORTHERN 42" AND 36" CULVERTS
AND WINGWAH S.
3.4 ONCE NORTHERN SIDE 1WNGWALL AND CULVERT ARE INSTALLED, REMOVE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE (COFFER DAMS), REMOVE POLY—FABRIC AND DIVERT
CHANNEL, INTO CULVERTS.
3.5 BRING SOUTH SIDE OF CULVERT TO ROUGH GRADE WITH REST OF SITE.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE •• CROSSING ALONG P!I CROSSING
12. INSTALL TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PER TOWN OF APEX
13. INSTALL BOTTOMLESS BOX CULVERT AND BRING CROSSING TO FINAL GRADE TO ALLOW ACCESS
INTO PHASE 2. ALL. WORK SHALL TAKE PLACE DURING DRY CONDITIONS AND FROM HIGH,
NON—JURISDICTIONAL, STABLE GROUND. AS THE NORTH SIDE AF THE CULVERT IS BROUGHT TO
FINAL GRADE, REMOVE THE TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING AND UTIU E THE CULVERT AS
ACCESS INTO PHASE 2, THE BOTTOMLESS BOX CULVERT MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION CAN BEGIN ON THE PHASE 2.

Appendix I
PHASE I ESA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Oak Pointe Property

69
SPANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL. INC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Oak Pointe Phase I ESA
Oak Pointe Phase I ESA
Old Jenks Road
Apex, NC
27523
prej)areljbr:
Lennar Corporation
700 N W 107th Avenue
Miami, Florida 33172
") 172
Preimre(l Icy:
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
4338 Bland Road
Raleiffli, North Carolina 27609
C,
April 25, 2016
�panle+ I n% noninent it I Inc., M6

I ._
1.0 Executive Surarr air
This report details the findings of a. Phase' I Environmental Site assessment ('ISA"") for a
property located alont7 Old Jenks Road. -'apex, Wake County, North Carolina. The subgect
property includes seven mapped tai; parcels (`�y'ake County PI`�s ()7337()(:,935, ()733709908,
0732798-112, 0732893803, 07,337,06-112. 07'))709-0'7, ()TQ SS 58 3 j. located in Apex, north
Carolina. The property adjoins and is styuth of Old Jenks Road, approximately 1 '3 mils; east o1'
Highway 55. It is generally rectangular in shape, on a north south lengthwise orientation. The
property totals approximately 58.2 acres, 'The current available deeds for the parcels that make
LIP the subject property are found in the Wake County Register of Deeds Book 15865 Page
1875, Book 68()2 Pate: 285, Book 5730 Pa -e 812, and Book 6802 Pa -e 287. Deed information
for three of parcels which make tip the subject property was not available throw<,dh Fake County
C IS or the Wake County Tax Assessor's website.
The objective of this ISA vas to identify recotunired environmental conditions ("RECs") in
connection N ith the subject property.
Site reconnaissance was performed by SEI personnel on April 13 and April 19. 2016.
Reconnaissance resulted in the folloNvineg observations:
The property is densely vegetated. An intermittent to perennial stream with intact relic
floodplain runs from the northeastern corner of the property to the soutwest corner of the
property, forming, the western property boundary- of the southernmost tax parcel of the property.
A dammed pond exists on the east side of the southernmost parcel. Areas of wetlands exist
below the pond and in the floodplain of the strearn throughout its length.
De minimis household trash and debris are found on the northern tract in the vicinity of the,
historical modular home that is currently occupied on the property. Some discarded steel tanks
of unknown origin and approximately 250 to 500 gallons in size are discarded on the northern
tracts. These tanks appear to be consistent with prior findings by others, and were observed to
be in similar (if not the same) geographic positions as prior reports indicated. No staining, of
soils or distressed veg,etation was observed around these tanks, and they all appeared to be
empty (some with rusted holes. Prior .reports suggest the owner of the property had imported
these tanks to the property prior to 2014 for the purpose of making grills or pig, cookers. The
northern tract includes at least one hand -dug, well and septic system drain fields. Several
dilapidated outbuildings and foundation structures are located on the northern tracts. These
observations do not constitue an RBC for the purposes of this assessment.
At least two abandoned structures exist on the southern tract, one of which appears to be an old.
dwelling. Access was not attempted to these structures. No evidence of heating oil tanks or
underg,round petroleum storage tanks was observed around these structures.
Under contract with SEL Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ("EDR") of Milford, Connecticut
prepared an EDR Radius it==lap ("RM") for the subject property. SEI provided EDR Nvitb the
location of the subject property bused on information provided to SEI by representatives of
Lennar Corporation. EDR analyzed federal, state, and tribal ,o�-ernment ens ironnzental
databases and EDR proprietary records for information on sites or facilities with known or
expected environmental conditions within Minimum search distances of the subject property. as
specified by, ASTM E 1527.13.
The RM listed three individual sites that were not mapped due to missing or inadequate tiddre ss
information (i.e., Orphan Summary). To the extent reasonably ascertainable. efforts were mate
to determine the physical location of each non -mapped site, relative to the subject property;
however, the location of each non -napped site was not practically re-,•iewable as defined in
AS-fA4 E 1577-13. Consequently. th.e potential for impact of all non -mapped sites to the
Phase I Environmental Site 1s,essinent Rept€ fi
Oak Pointe Phase I ESA
Apex. 'Wake Cotanty,. NC
April 25, 201E SPANGLER

- 2 -
presence of recognized environmental conditions oil the subject. property was not reasonably
ascertainable.
Analysis of the RIM indicated that the subject property was not listed oil the searched databases.
Records identified eighteen ( 18) mapped sites located within the minimum search as defined by
ASTNI E 1;27-13. None of these mapped sites (soine ot'which were duplicative listings) is all
active, regulatory incident --ail have been closed out as rernediated (if necessary) by NC DEQ
accordinu to file records cited in the RM. The corresponding documentation for these databases
zn
is included in Attachment B.
The physical setting (i.e.. location of drainage feature, and'or relative topographical position) of
C, 11-1
each of the eighteen discrete influmUlli-distance locations listed in the RM were evaluated to
determine the potential for impact to the likely presencem
of recognized environmental
1
conditions on the subject property. Based on distance to the subject property, topographical
features, remediation efforts, and the type of contaminant known to have impacted these sites,
in our best professional judgment:, the eighteen discrete mapped sites have no potential to
impact the subject property.
Site reconnaissance conducted by SEI personnel did riot reeal the presence of hazardous
substances or petroleum products under conditions that indicate an existing release, past release
of material threat of' a release in connection with past and current uses of the subject property.
As a result of these observations, no evidence vas fOUnd of the presence of likely presence of
any hazardous substance or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate
an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of'release of any hazardous substance or
petroleum products onto structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or Surface
water of the property.
As a result of these observations and the findings of this assessment, no evidence suggests the
presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance or petroleum products on the property
tinder conditions that indicate an existing release. a past release, or a material threat of release
of any hazardous substance or petroleum products onto structures on the property or into the
,ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. Therefore, no RECs in association with
the subject property have been identified in this assessment.
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Purpose
The objective of this ESA is to identify, to the extent feasible., recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the subject property pursuant to the process described in ASTM
Standard E 1527-13 -- Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process. This involved evaluating the property for
contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,. Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) and for petroleum products and other environmental conditions.
2.2 Se ope-o f-Sery ices
Spangler Environmental. Inc. has (SEI) completed this ESA in accordance kith methodology
described in ASTM E 1327-13. Achieving assessmentobjecti�es entailed the followinZ7u:
® Identifying historic uses of the property from the present to the property's first developed
use, or 1940. whichever is earlier.
• Reviekvina and interpreting reasonably ascertainable and practically re%leNvable federal.
state, and local public records fOr the Subject property and immediate
'vicinity.
• Performing visual inspection and Nvalk-through of the subject property and immediate
vicinity, including photographic documentation.
Phase I Emironmental Site Assessment Report
Oak Pointe Phase I FSA
p,,, ,Nr -
ake Count%. NC
April 25, 2016 SPANGLER