20160211 Ver 2_Modifications_20170303

Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Engineering Solutions for Civil Design,
Stormwater Management, and Stream/Wetland Restoration
March 2, 2017
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Action ID: 2016-004'``
DWR: #15-0211 County: Wake
Dear Mr. Smith:
JO&OCV/
V A,
The Turnipseed Nature Preserve is currently under construction in Wendell. The Preserve is
verified for temporary impacts to 0.083 acres of wetlands to install matting for construction
access under a Nationwide Permit Number 42. The bridge and boardwalk spanning Gin Branch
was to be set on wooden piles to be driven into the wetland and stream banks. Since the permit
was verified by the US Army Corps of Engineers on April 11, 2016 and DWR on April 8, 2016
it was found that large rock formations on site do not allow driven piles to be a viable option for
the installation of the bridge and boardwalk. In the enclosed revised PCN the proposed bridge
abutments are concrete on either side of the bridge and will be anchored to the bedrock, the
bridge has been lengthened 20 feet to move the abutments further away from the stream for the
installation of the concrete abutments, wooden piers supporting the boardwalk will be placed on
concrete footings. One (1) concrete footing for the southern bridge abutment and three (3)
concrete footings for the boardwalk are proposed within the wetland resulting in 0.05 acres of
permanent impacts to install the concrete footings. Because the DWR permit and Buffer approval
included the impacts of bridge and boardwalk footprint no buffer and stream impacts have been
changed with this PCN revision. Revisions to the PCN application submitted March 1, 2016 to
the US Army Corps and DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit can be seen in red throughout the
enclosed revised PCN application.
Sincerely,
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
C aici
Bec . Ward, P.E.
Enclosures: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers General Permit Verification dated March 1, 2016
DWR 401 and Buffer Approval Letter dated April 8, 2016
Revised PCN Application
Minor Water Quality Application Fee: Check for $240.00
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
4805 Green Road Suite 100, Raleigh NC 27616-2848
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 8, 2016
Wake County Facilities Design &
Construction
Attn: Mark Forestieri
P.O. Box 550
Raleigh, NC 27602
PAT MCCRORY
Gmyn nr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Neovianr
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
n;r<I,ar
DWR #16-0211
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALiTY CERTIFICATION WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE PER THE NEUSE RIVER 13ASiy,RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROTECTION RULES (15A NCAC 02B 0233) WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Dear Mr. Forestierl:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your
application dated February 12, 2016 and received by the Division of Water Resources (Division)
on March 1, 2016 with additional information received via email on April 4, .2016 and April 7,
2016. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification Numbers
3893 and 3890 and the conditions listed below: These certifications are associated with the use
of Nationwide Permit Numbers 33 and 42 once they are Issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, Including those required .by _(but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the enclosed certification and the
following additional conditions:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved provided that all of the other specific and
general conditions of the Certification and Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are
approved, including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 02B .0506(b)(c) and 15A NCAC 028
.0233(8))
Division or Water Resources, Raleigh Regional 011 ice, Water Quality Operations Section htlp:/Iportal.ncdenr.org/web/%vq/d�ps Mail Service Center. Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Location: , 3800 Barrett Drive. Raleigh, NC 27609 Phnnc: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

EA
Turnipseed Nature Preserve
DWR #16-0211
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 2 of 4
Type of Impact Amount Approved Amount Approved
(units) (units)
Permanent Temporary
Wetland 0 (acres) 0.083 (acres)
Buffers —Zone 1 388 (square feet) 2,376 (square feet)
Bridge A
Buffers —Zone 2 246 (square feet) 1,180 (square feet)
Bridge A
Buffers —Zone 1 3,003 (square feet) 2,392 (square feet)
Bridge B
Buffers —none 2 735 (square feet) 2,340 (square feet)
Bridge B
2. Diffuse Flow Plan: Submittal of a Local Government Approvalftquired
Because the stormwater management plan approved by Wake County is being used to meet
diffuse flow requirements on this project, you are required to submit one copy of the
approved stormwater management plan (SMP), including plan details on full-sized plan
sheets (hardcopy or digital), with proof of Wake County's approval. The approved SMP
shall be submitted to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617) before any impacts authorized in this certification occur. The
SMP may not be modified without prior written authorization from Wake County. If the
SMP is modified in the future, then you shall provide one modified SMP with proof of
approval to the DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit prior to the commencement of the
modifications. [15A NCAC 028.0233 (5)]
3. No Waste Spoil Solids or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0501
and .05021
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the -areas that have -been approved to
infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure

Turnipseed Nature Preserve
DWR #1670211.
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 3 of 4
compliance with 15 NCAC 02H.0500. [15A NCAC 02H.0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2) and ISA NCAC
02H.0507 (c))
5. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification and
Buffer Authorization. if you change your, project, you must notify the Division and you may
be required to submit a new application package with the appropriate fee. if the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this approval letter and General Certification
and is responsible for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 026.0507(d)(2)J
6. This approval and its conditions arefinal and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5]
This Certification and Buffer Authorization can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of
General Statute 1506 by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of
Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the
OAH at-hity: /www.ncoahcom or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone] for
information.
Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be - iled with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any
applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through
Friday between 8:00am and 5:000m, excluding ofi`icial state holidays).
The petition maybe faxed to. the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one copy of
the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending by First Class Wail
via the US Postal. Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the. petition must also be served to DENR:
Sam Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601

Please send one (1) copy of the petition to DWR:
If sending by First Class may
via the US Postal Service:
Karen Higgins
NC DENR-DWR — 401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, 'NC 27699-1617
Turnipseed Nature Preserve
DWR #16-0211
401 AND BUFFER APPROVAL
Page 4 of 4
If sending via delivery service
(e.g. UPS, FedEx):
Karen Higgins
NC DENR-DWR — 401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 028.0233. Please contact Cherri
Smith at 919-791-425 or.cherri.smith ncdenr. ov if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincer y,
Danny Smith
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Enclosures: GC 3893 & 3890
cc: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Raleigh Regulatory field Office; 3331 Heritage Trade Dr
Ste. 105; Wake Forest, NC 27597
Becky Ward, Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.; 4805 Green Road, Ste. 100; Raleigh, NC
27616-2848
DWR RRO 401/Riparian Buffer file
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action 1D. 2916-00443 Cotmty: Waite U.S.G.S. Quad: hK ar on
GENERAL PERMff (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Perinitt e. WE Cauaty IMirk Fareitie_i
Address: wale Quafv Office Brilfts
336 Fayetteville Street
Raieiatr.:NC 276!1. —
Telephone Number. 91
Nearest Tbww.
Nearest Waterway: ut to Glu Brantch
Rivcr$asint HUQ NMa
Coordinates: NJI§C N.=7S.4&W W
+,« ...r :• _ !.'1'J a17,ir, JIM r11'_
L'.....1_.*1
Izw 19 Serlian 404 (Clean Nater Act, 33 USC 1344)
Q Section l0 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Ate: Regimill CMMW1 Number or Nationwide Parra i+lumber: V
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECL4L CONOlTIONS
Year c U entlinflMd by The above re6egenceil permit Vmvj" R is
condition and r submitted � _strict `iooar�sec w� ,lire
y application and attached information dated ] #Vh 1.2916, Any vietatiea of the attached
coaditioas or deviation from yowmlimitted plans may subject Me`13muittee to a stop murt order, a restoration seder, a Class
1admilaishm ivep y:a d/0r a Attics. '
This verification will remain vaW mW s�cpiratioa state klendfied below cites the nownwidgkegmal abaft is modified,
suspdsded er•m eked. If. pdorso dies ion date idanillod below, the parmit=dWrUglon is Tchs ed wAlw
modified, this verification will rennin valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the
modirsecinatioznyidahtgiondpainx lftwmdmwidetregfinW:pumu'laudwrbatiionexom or is suspended, revvk44orfjMoMfA
such that -die achy* would:ao.k fter somply w the terruszodcuriditions of#he:nationsvide�I i ia. s�vules which have
commenced CLe., are under camftudkm) or are under contract to c ommeam in retianoe upon the wfim ddemgiortal pem k wiD remain
authorized provided 3lw activity is conVieted within tWeIVC nnonebs of die date of the nagoinwWagional permft`3 j.
Orxevocaiion, =INS.discretionary authomy has been exercised 00 a case4iy ow basis to modify, suggmadormveke the
alldKNtElfiM
Activities subject to Section 404 (as :indicated above) may $Iso require .an individual Section 401 1i mw Quaft Certification You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
Fw ac UvWm OMM ink Within the IWMIY .coastal mintiessuubject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management.Act (CAMA). prior
to begirmin jr work You must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This motif the Army verification does nw relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required federal. State
or local approvaWpermits.
If there am my questiorns tep
please contact Tasha Alexrrii
Corks Regulatory official:
this verification, any of the conditions _ofihe Permit, or the Caps of F.rrgineers regniatory, proBram,
9V'5% -48M, ext. 33 or tasha l almudenSues - -- i2
Tasha
Expiration mate .of Verificaticv. Mi r h IL 2017
Date: Anirif_ i i. 3816

. Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. J@ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area- TM PeliminarY tletennihation is not an appealable action sender the Regulatory prognarnn. Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
8. 0: There are Navigable Waters ufthe United States within ibe abovedescribedPF0JW 81ra to the reclaims of
s�JeCt t the -permit
Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and. Section 444 of the.Clean Water.Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
Publishedgulations, this detierMnation may be relied upon for a period not to exceed Five years from the date of this
C. 0 There are waters of the US anftr wetlands within :the _above 4escr ibed ect a
i�J tam to the penirrit retluirenientsof
Section 4041 of the Clean Water Act (CWAX33 LISC J.1344) Unless there is_a rhaage:in .the law or ow published rsguiadons,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
D. 0 The jurisdictional area mithin the above described project area have .been, identirted corder a previous_ action Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW -
Basis. for Determh afion: Based on, iafomratioa 5obn- *ted by Jke a M.L tbeiect a at+pear3 la cthilsit
c r ! .S. as deiuced Is CFR 328. the dD Guidcboafe tie. Raumnes Gurdeace) the 1987 W tend
rMn7i�nrs�rv.r to the IM MMmat Errstera li9edmertt v.tl This
u lctioaal ctrrarins n is
W44beimmdaven,Daly rbe site a ntahr etier natesofRCe U.S.
but the entire ntrr=IV was not evalruted
L A#ilelittioji USDA mato Participants
This delineationldetenninfifwn has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this rcgnest. The dd' may not be valid. for arc weed conservation provisions of the Fwd Sec
�ity
Act of.1985. _ If youar. your tenant in a USDA. Progtanc partic4=1% oranticipate partit ipatioa - USDA prognrms* you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting soil►.
F. ApIwals Information wig informal" l" applies only to AW oved jurisdictional .ddecr,ninatim _as indicated in B
and C above).
This iciiz'constitrxes arc approved jurisdictional det+eaminatim far the above.described.stw If
you you may request an administrative � object to this
appeal -tender C� , illations at 33 CFR fart 33 f_ Enclosed,you will fund a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) left shoot and request forappeat (RFA) form, if you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a Completed RFA form to the following address.
US Amey Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Ofirca
too Forsyth Street SW, Room IUM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-88111
Phone: ON) 562-5137
In order, for an RFA to be accepted by the Gaps, the Corps must.determine that it is compift that it rneM the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331 S, and that it has been received by the Division office within 69 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address within Gni daysof the date below.
**It Is not necessary to sut&to t ' ision offu:e ifyou not object to The determination in this correspondence.**
Corps RegulatoryOfficial44,,
aslra Alexander
Issue Date.ofiD: Aocll 11,, 201
Expiration Date afJD: NIAThe Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest Ievel of support to the public, To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online athtto:/lreeulatorv.usacesurvey cool.

W At CMBi'll11M .
Please be advbedibat jfmM*gudikgawts to waters of the US, aither= spt 'b' or anJadjsc�t to
�ridr `tLb: l adiity, thb
art PF@Powd. $" hit
the careentimpads to o[dke ILS. and wM be rid, ti�� cumularaBB�y arum
will be tamed if individiud or cumnladve (Le., past and went)or dwwk&n or waters of tits u.& are
greater tM ISO BMW kvtsfperamw o later mitteat stneaar chaund andfar&l acre of wcdnn&
tit t for ilraba� or �� � .i�et �� ��
=w&Gr 8S acm of w�edand, wiD be psocas� an udividual Pa mit. nh
veriffcafto of the use of the Nationwide Permit Program for Sh project does not imply dW this office wW
m my More: to mlpnct wamrsvftbe;ti.. SU Abd r anoefiftdwft tbb
*•
* Irbe Dbtrict Commanderto tine-sb ft to waive the '390Inear foot Nmh-%r iaternrit cu# streams an a cane -6y
case. iis
rega r a i eiuwrititgattd indude e%#Ire requesL

Action ID Number. 2016-00443 County: _ Wake
Permittee: Wake County/ Mark Forestier
Date Verification Issued: April 11 2016
Project Manager. Tasha Alexander
Upon impletion of the qty authorized by this permit and any mitigation seed by the permit, sign this
certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
AtM.: CESAWRG R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Please note that your -permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Anny Corps of
End representative. Failute to utl tion may in the
y with any termor conditions t�f'this
suspending. modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Cl— I administrative penalty, or
Corps initiating other appropriate legal -action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the ,above referenced
terms a� condition bft�'saii permit been completed in accordance with
permit; and required adtigatio was ecwnpleted is accordance =with the -permit
conditions..
-Signage ofPe;mittee
E?

Applicant: Wake County / Mark Fo
Attached is:
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL
PRELIMINARY JURISDIETI0N
11STRA')<IrVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PRO ;SS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
File Number: SAW -20I6-00443
;standard Permit or Letter
Permit or Letter of vermis
DETERMINATION
AL DETERM INATI
U3te: April II, 2016
Section below
ra
0
0
SECTION i -.`Elle fbillowing ilenti�es your
- Tights and 00011s regarding an adininistrmive appeal oftfie aFb—W a iston. - -- -
Additional information may be frrttrtd at r/wo .ttsace.armv nail%issiprtsiCiviiwari { e storcvpn a» p�,iis sus
or Co regulations at 33 CHR Rart 931.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: Ifyou received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: if you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section 11 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT. If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your wort: is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
You may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section Il of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: 1PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary 1D. The Preliminary 1D is not appealable. if you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be a
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTIONS-. -----------
LREQUESTIDR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INi IAL pROFMMM PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for psion or -
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach addititthing the e form to clarify objections
be your reasons jt to aninitialobjections are addressed in the administrative record.) onal information
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
Clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add nein information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location
record. of information that is already in the administrative
iII t CONIfiA'CT FOR QUESUUONS OR iNFORMArON:
If --- - you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Tasha Alexander CESAD-PDO
919-554-48M
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room I OM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT Ql ENTRY: Your signature below Phone: [phone]
grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any govemment
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation. and will have the opportunity to rtici ate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Signature of appellant or
Far appeals am """a/ Prnfjered Permits send this forret tee;
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: Tasha Alexander, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 284Q3
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jttrisdictional Deterntinattotts send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M I5, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 411.2M
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF -PERSON- REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
waO ter. Nmk Fmusdwk 3W F4vftvft Sit. RMeW NC 2M
C. DISTRICT OFFICE; FILE NAIVE; AND NUMBER:
cesAw."*, 201"0"3. wake 9I Muk fmq8tWd
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
THE ATTACHED TABLETO WCUARENT.MULTME WATTS AT WFEREW
State: NC CQuntyJParishJborough: waw
:. wry
Center aminates of site (latortg _ �'
Lat. 3sas� 'N; .Long. -7a4a °W
Universal Transverse Mentor:
Name of nearest- waterbody: uT to Gn &am ,
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wedwW waters:
&Mf feet: width (ft) andior acres.
Cowaniin Class:
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: 0•083 acres.
Cowardin Class;
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters.
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY)-
✓ Office (Desk) Determimation. Date: w sr. ma
Fish -Determination. Date(s):
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
ftheck all lhat apply checked Items should be included in case file and,
Tchocked and requested, appropriately refersenoe sources below):
Maps, Ply, PkKs or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
aPPlicant/cor suiiant
0 Data sheets pmparedfsubmittad by or on behaff of ft
aP . ' nsuttant.
v/ Office concurs with data sheeWdelinea�n report..
Offices does not concur with data sheeWdekwadm report.
0 Data sheets Prepared by the Com
APs navigable waters- study:
DU.S.. Geological -Survey Hydrolo& Atias:
USGS NHD data
USGS 8 and 12 dVt.HUC maps
U.S. Geological Surrey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Q:USDA Natural Resources Conservation. Service Soar Survey.
Citation. y
National wetlands invenjory map(s). Cite name:
Ll StateALOWI Wetland inventory map($).
El FEMAIFiRM, maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1829)
Photographs,, D Aerial,(blame & Dale) or
Previous detem matiDn(Other s). Fite no. ame nd date of response P letter:
Other information (Please specify):

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there maybelurisdicilonatwaters of the
United Stales on the subject site, and the Permit applicant or other affected party
who requested *I*- pr6ftinary JD is hereby advised of his or her oi3tion to
request and obi an approved jurisductional-determinalm (JD) for thats4e
Nevertheless, the Permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. M any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains air individual permit,.or
a nationwide General -Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"We -const nen' (PCN), or requests vNWMWM for a non -reporting
NWfP, or oar genwal pmt and the permit appy has not requested an
approved JD forthe activity, .the.:permit applica►nt.ishereby rraefe aware of the
fO#DwkW (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a Permit authorization
based on a prelkninary JD, which does not make an oftiat motion of
jurisdictional waftm;-(2)that the -q*NMWhas °option to, mquestan-aWoved
JD beiore:acaepfg,the term end condliki W of the peri it Win, and
that basing a.pern*authoftatiion on an approved JD cmM
Possibly result in less
WmPensafty nftatiOn
ng Wired or dftrent special corxidrom; (3) .that
the`appticant`has the right to request an ss dual perms M#W#M accepting
the_#erns and conditons of.the;NWP or other general_pen*auction; (4)
that the appOcant can accept a permit autimorizatbn and thereby agree to comply
with afl time €arms and conditions of that permit, including-whateverrmiligation
requ kernetrtshas delern*wd-to-benecessW, (5),that rtaldng
any activity in, reliance, upon the sum permit authorization vAhM requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicants acceptance of the use of the
Prefirninary JD, but that either form of JD wr'n be processed as soon as is
PTa*MW (6)mcepft a perr* authoezation {E.g., sigrw* a ptoffered
indsradual penTift) or undertalcing any ac&*In velianw on any.foun of.Corps
Pew authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and anter wafter bodies on the site affected in anyway by that activity
are jurisal oral Wateis of the UnIbd`SUdes. and precludes any mange to
such Jurisdclion in any administrative or judicial compawme or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant erects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
wl
I beped as soon as is practicable. Fw# w, an apprrnred JD, a _proffered
bdiMuai t bird all-ternms and conditions contained #tueeln� or individual
Permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
.and that in any administrative aPPeat. Donal issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.FL-3315(a)(2)j. If, during that adrtmi ive appeal, it becotnes necessary
to make art determination WWW CWA*Wict=.e a 3W, or
to .provide an off delineation of Jurisdictional waters on the sem, the Corps win
Provide an aPproved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicatbie.

Thus-preiiminM'JD finds that there -my be- waters of the unite States on the
subject project site. and identifies aN aquatic features on the she that couid be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the fonowhV information:
IMPORTANT MOM The irrtormation recorded an tris form tlass not
r t%ftO 1 I--- .. - --- -
Project Manager
MEQJ Dj.
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(RF, unless obtaining
hkc")

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form version 1.4 January 2009
Revised Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
401/404 Permits Issued April 2016.
A. Applicant Information 401/404
to April 2016 package can be seen in red
1. Processing throughout the document for 2017 submittal.
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 42,33 or General Permit (GP) number_
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ felon -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Cerfrt ration — Express © Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this rx*fication solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
for the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes 0 No
11'. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? if so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in4ieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑Yes RNo
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Tumipseed Nature Preserve
2b. County:
Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / turn:
Wendell, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A 4Z t
2e. NCDOT only, T.t_P. or state project no:
N/A
ly
3. Owner Mformat en 1 G '
2al
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Wake County
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
See attached list in supplemental data word document Q4pt BUFF R RMoprp
3c. Responsible Party (for LtC ifContact
applicable):
Mark Fo restieri Wake County Facilities Resign Construction Direc
3d. Street address:
Wake County Office Building 336 Fayetteville Street
3e. City, state, zip:
RalekA North Carolina 27601
3f. Telephone no.:
919-856-6356
3g. Fax no-:
9194856-6355
3h. Email address.
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
1�

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Becky L. Ward, P.E.
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
5c. Street address:
4805 Green Road, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, North Carolina 27616-2848
5e. Telephone no.:
919-870-0526
5f. Fax no.:
919-870-5359
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See attached supplemental information
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.7454 Longitude: -78.4034
1 c.
Property size:
279 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Gin Branch (FEMA Basin 14, Stream 2) & Marks Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Please see supplemental information attached to this form for description.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.35
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 10,800
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Please see supplemental information attached to this form for the explanation.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see supplemental information attached to this form for the explanation.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
See email in the Wetland Determination section of the Appendix.
5.
Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The initial project will include the trails, access, and parking included on the attached plans. It is possible in the future that additional trails will be added
in the park as need arises.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries © Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 T
Access with bridge mats
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.033
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.05
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.083
2h. Comments:
W1 impacts will include temporary construction tion access for construction equipment to set bridge/boardwalk pilings and to construct set the prefabricated
bridge Band wooden boardwalk. Bridge matts will be placed on all wetland areas for construction equipment to work from as called for on the plans.
W2 impacts will include permanent impacts for concrete footings for bridge and boardwalk.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
S2
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
NA - A bridge mat will be installed over UT to Gin Branch downstream of the existing pond to provide access for construction equipment- This bridge
access mat wit be installed to span from top of bank to top of bank. No construction equipment will be allowed to cross the tributary other than at this
location. The construction for the bridge over Gin Branch will be accessed from either side of the stream no construction equipment will be permitted to
cross the stream. Therefore no stream impacts are anticipated for this project that would impair stream function.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
Temporary Access
UT to Gin Branch
No
2,376
1,180
B2 T
Temporary Access
Gin Branch
No
2,392
2,340
B3 P
Trail, Bridge,abutments
UT to Gin Branch
No
388
246
B4 P
Trail, Bridge, abutments
Gin Branch
No
3,003
735
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
8,159
4,501
6i. Comments:
See attached supplemental data word document for buffer impacts descriptions.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Trails and parking lots were designed to remain outside of buffers and wetlands. The streams have been crossed with elevated bridges and
boardwalks to avoid channel impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Equipment will not cross at Gin Branch.Construction equipment will not be allowed to cross the stream only at locations with temporary bridge mats. All
work in wetland areas will be performed from bridge mats.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See attached Stormwater Report
❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater impact analysis was completed for the project and has been submitted to Wake County for review and approval. Both peak flow and
nitrogen export were investigated in the report. Detention was required by Wake County at both proposed parking lots. The nutrient export with the
proposed improvements is within the allowable amounts for the Neuse River Basin and therefore a BMP for nutrient removal was not required. One
copy of the stormwater impact analysis document has been been provided as a separate document to DWQ. The approval letter will be will be made
available to DWR upon approval.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Wake County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
Wake County
Phase II
0 NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑X Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
M Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes Q No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There be facilitates the from the
will no rest room on site or wastewater generated proposed project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Axiom Environmental, Inc prepared a letter addressing federally protected species assessment and results in a letter included in the appendix.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
This project will not have open water impacts. NOAA EFH Mapper was used to determine that the project is not near areas designated as essential
fish habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The NC SHPO website was used to determine that the project would occur in or near an area that state, federal or tribal governments have designated
as having historic or cultural preservation status. A cemetery and building on the site have been preserved not currently identified on any register.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Gin Branch (FEMA Basin 14, Stream 2)is a FEMA regulated Stream, the Bridge crossing Gin Branch spans the floodway width and published water
surface elevation. A Flood study analysis and report was submitted to Wake County for approval by Ward Consulting Engineers.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodmaps site (www.ncfloodmaps.com) was searched for FEMA floodplain limits. Gin Branch HEC -RAS models were obtained from the NC
Geospacial Data office in Raleigh to complete the floodstudy.
Mark Forestieri
Z-2 8 - i ?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form Supplement Data
Turnipseed Nature Preserve, Wake County North Carolina
A. Applicant Information
3b.
As labeled on Wake County IMAPS map above:
1. Deed Book 015682; Deed Page
2. Deed Book 6816; Deed Page
Book 016370 Deed Page 0234D
3. Deed Book 002453; Deed Page
Jeed Book u6295 Deed Page 02245
4. Deed Book 001670; Deed Page
Deed book 016391; Deed Page 01866
5. Deed Book 001670; Deed Page
Deed Book 016391; Deed Page 01866
6. Deed Book 011511; Deed Page
7. Deed Book 006246; Deed Page
Deed Book 016391; Deed Page 02210
00958
00584 Purchased on 4/28/16 by Wake County Deed
00558 Purchased on 2/17/2016 by Wake County,
00185 Purchased on 5/19/2016 by Wake County,
00185 - Purchased on 5/19/2016 by Wake County,
01096
00117 - Purchased on 5/19/2016 by Wake County,
1
Ward Consulting Engineers, PC Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Rev 3-30-2016
Rev 2-28-2017

8. Deed Book 012945; Deed Page
9. Deed Book 6816; Deed Page
Book: UiE:70; Deer] 'j,ge
10. Deed Book 011974; Deed Page
11. Deed Book 014693; Deed Page
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
01382
00584 — Purchased on 4/28/2016 by Wake County Deed
02305
01719
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1772261939,1772152364,1772251653,1772363030,1772461434,1772144414,1772241463
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
Wake County acquired the properties included in this project to create a nature preserve for Wake
County residences. The properties had been previously used for crop production and recreational uses.
The site is comprised of agricultural fields, mixed pine hardwoods, bottomland forest, loblolly pine
forest, wetlands, and a power line easement. Gin Branch and Sandy Branch bisect the Preserve that is
bound to the south by Turnipseed Road and to the west by Marks Creek. Residential properties border
the Preserve to the north and east. Conservation easements restricting the type and nature of potential
development exist on the Turnipseed Nature Preserve and adjacent properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
The entire 279 acre property was not investigated for wetlands. Wetlands were only investigated within
the limits of disturbance for the site in the low lying areas. Wetlands were identified in the
environmental report only within the limits of disturbance in the broad floodplain of Gin Branch by
Axiom Environmental. This area is currently heavily influenced by beaver dams. The listed estimated
wetland acreage of 0.35 acres shown in item 3b describes only the wetland area for a distance of 40 feet
upstream and downstream of the proposed bridge on Gin Branch. The total acreage of wetlands within
the site beyond the limits of disturbance was not quantified. Maps and wetland determination data
forms for the work completed by Axiom Environmental are included in the wetland determination
section of the attached Appendix.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Turnipseed Nature Preserve is designated as a Wake Nature Preserve for its ecological and geological
significance and will be open for limited public access for hiking and nature exploration as well as
research. No restroom facilities will be located on site.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Preserve will be minimally developed, including two gated public entrances and parking areas, trails,
bridges and boardwalks, and picnic areas. Public entrance to the site from the west will be developed at
Pleasants Road as a gravel parking lot with access to the trail system throughout the park. Public
entrance to the site from the east will be upgraded and maintained along a gravel park access road
Ward Consulting Engineers, PC Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Rev 3-30-2016
Rev 2-28-2017

leading from Hunt Valley Trail to a parking lot with access to the trail system. A detention basin was
required to mitigate the peak discharge at each parking lot. The 1 -year 24 hour storm event will be held
in the pond and infiltrated into the native soils. The dry pond will be re -vegetated with herbaceous
vegetation. The park improvements have been designed to minimize clearing of existing vegetation on
site.
Several picnic areas will be located adjacent to each parking area. The trail system will consist of a 6 -
foot wide screened trail with 2 -foot grassed shoulders and will be constructed on grade where possible.
Standard 10' boardwalks 15 -inch RCP pipe crossings are proposed to be used for crossing small streams
and tributaries along the trail. Two bridges are proposed to cross streams and wetlands along the trail
corridor. Bridge A is a 10 -foot wide, 30 feet long bridge proposed to cross an unnamed stream
downstream of the existing dam. Bridge B is a 10 feet wide 120 feet long bridge to span the floodway
and the wetlands of Gin Branch with boardwalk joining to each abutment to connect the trail back to
natural grade. Bridge B will set upon concrete abutments on concrete footings anchored to bedrock. The
abutments will be connected to the boardwalk setting upon a combination of piers and walls all on
concrete footings. Permanent wetland impacts of the concrete fill for the concrete footers total 0.05
acres as shown on revised impact map. Concrete footers will extend at least a foot below scour depth of
Gin Branch, or be anchored to bedrock. Revised construction drawings are attached. A construction road
will be cleared for equipment access to Gin Brach to construct the bridge and boardwalk. The contractor
will be starting on the interior of the park and working out as they construct the trails. The contractor
will cross UT to Gin Branch with temporary bridge mats and will construct the bridge and boardwalk
from both sides of Gin Branch within the limits of disturbance as shown on the plans.
It is anticipated that earth moving equipment will be used for the project including but not limited to
excavators, loaders, and dump trucks. A crane will most likely be required to set the bridge over Gin
Branch.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
6i Buffer Impacts Comments:
B1 temporary impacts include area within the buffer that will be required to be used for
temporary access to construct the proposed improvements at UT to Gin Branch for
Pedestrian Bridge A.
132 temporary impacts include the area within the buffer that will be required to be used for
temporary access to construct the proposed improvements at Gin Branch for Pedestrian
Bridge B.
B3 permanent impacts include the area of the proposed trail, bridge, and concrete footing that
will be installed in the buffer of the tributary to Gin branch downstream of the existing
pond for Pedestrian Bridge A that will be constructed within the buffers.
B4 permanent impacts include the area for the bridge, bridge abutments, and boardwalk for
Bridge B across Gin Branch that will be constructed within the buffers.
Ward Consulting Engineers, PC Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Rev 3-30-2016
Rev 2-28-2017

E. Stormwater Manaeement and Diffuse Flow Plan (Required by DWQ)
3c. Stormwater Management Plan: A copy of the stormwater impact analysis has been submitted to
DWQ along with the PCN. The plan has been submitted to Wake County and an approval letter will be
submitted to DWQ upon receipt.
4
Ward Consulting Engineers, PC Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Rev 3-30-2016
Rev 2-28-2017

Impact Maps

1
a \ 1 I ♦ ��� 1 i' f 1
\ / �, • ! /� FLOODPINN ► ► FLOODPLA
GIN BRANI
GM BRANCH I ►
� \ I I l • A'l e
\ � f �� 3Q 1 r,3/rlaf � EXf$71NG I ► ��
TOP OF BANK f e
CltU91ED
;eek
7EET'fNIG9��—
Q)
'-
I \w,
• i
I
B1
1
,►
1
i
a rn
�00
z
1
' 1
201 1
gZ3rnrn
PCN EXHIBIT MAP
V
cu V - --
i Q' V�
� T'fDFSTRIAN BRDOE A 1 w,
SFE STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEETS ►
�
-
i d
l/'f
0
L
[LS
e IRI'
`+ 1
ROOD PRONE SOLS
REVISIONS
cu 10
z�
.-+�-w••• SURVEYED TREfl.ME
TEMPORARY SWM CROSSIRG 6RDCE MATS
o00
rna_�
/ • - �� 1 INV. OUT -198.0.3 FT.
r .. tl 1` '• \ �` \� / w, �.'�� °" a-74.9 (TOTAL)
2 SILT FENCE / T C-7 HEADWALL I .� 1 10
hP,
IAT
I AT PI II NLET -
LESS EN/ PE
5S MA% SLOPE i E I 1 5 NNLENGTH
I\ I TREE : • i / STREAM I E i TO ELEVATION 202 Fr.
\' 'r' / 7 ,• i ,i TW OF BANK
e.-� 4►�, �F I / / OUTFLOW CHANNEL
l / / CENTERUNE
_ I
206
204
202
200
]C Y
DO Q
DO m
oa oME
5x SLOPE
1
i 10 al
i
GRADE
ss SLOPE DUAi 36 Rm
196
1
1�
196 CONCRETE ABUTMENT
194
49+00 49+2D 49+40 49M 49+60 50M 50+20 50+40 50+60 50+80 51+00
PROFILE MEW
1'-20' HORIZONTAL
1'-Y VERTICAL
206
204
202
200
196
196
1914
51+20 51+40
U
a
Q)
V o
W
as
J N O
cl—
a rn
�00
z
d
v Zrn
gZ3rnrn
PCN EXHIBIT MAP
V
cu V - --
i Q' V�
y
E
a�
-
i d
l/'f
0
L
[LS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROOD PRONE SOLS
REVISIONS
cu 10
z�
.-+�-w••• SURVEYED TREfl.ME
TEMPORARY SWM CROSSIRG 6RDCE MATS
o00
_ CHEDK DAM
M
Z
911 BUFFER IMPACT
N4-J -Z 3
Date: 2-26-2016
20 70 0 20 40
(U2
SCALE 1"=20'
1. DELLO$ FOLIND IN CHANNEL UNKNOWN TO WHAT DEPTN.
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL DEBRIS AND FILL WIN SURABLE SOL
PRIOR TO CULVERT INSTILLATION.
2 CONTRACTOR TO CROSS STREAM ONLY AT TEMPORARY BRIDGE NAT LOCATION.
1 POND OUTLET CHANNEL NOT AIRISDICTNNIAL STREAM - WOW N CHANNEL AND CROSSING AVAILABLE.
Q)
cl—
Q)
L
PCN EXHIBIT MAP
C�
Z zLEGEND
(v'
WAKE COUNTY GTS CONTOURS
SURVEYED CONTOURS
— - - — PROPERTY BOUNDARY
••-•---------•• USGS STREAM CENTERLINE
100 -YEAR FEMA FLOODPLAIN
50D -YEAR IFMA FLOODPLAM
185 - . - SO' STREAM BUFFER
l/'f
0
L
[LS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROOD PRONE SOLS
REVISIONS
LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
8F SILT FENCE
1 3/30/16
.-+�-w••• SURVEYED TREfl.ME
TEMPORARY SWM CROSSIRG 6RDCE MATS
_ CHEDK DAM
O O TREE PRDN"ON
911 BUFFER IMPACT
Date: 2-26-2016
20 70 0 20 40
C-2
SCALE 1"=20'

V.
I \
I �
l I
ABUTMENTS AND PM
CONTRACTOR M WORK FROM
EAST SDE TO MINIMIZE APACTS
TO BRAIDED CNANa m THE
WEST
202 15 FT. 15 FT. 15
200
105
196
194 \
192
190 C
188
186
EF�i7fiTlA
PLAN VIEW
1•_10'
• o
I
0
I
0
PEDESiRAN B
I 5
v i
I 6
o°
_ V
\IP3IBFIIH E]l21NC RDiJ2 OFP1N
1 ABITIIEIRT s1DMN E1f1ODFD To ROCK
FLOODPLAIN
r�
16 FT. 15 FT.
102 fim
1. NO 001MRUCIDN EQUIPMENT MAL BE PERIATTED TO Qt066 THE
D ISIAIG CHANNEL OF 9N BRANCH. VOW D TO BE COMKETED
FROM NORTH OR SOUTH BANNS
L VM ELEVA7 0 0 900 ON MOM AND BOARDWALK ARE TOP
200 OF DEM( MATWIIS. SEE STRUCTURAL DRA%WM
S DOUBLE SLT FENCE IN STREAM BUFFER.
195
192
188
166
184 E%TF)IDED 1 FT. - I - - EFE .M� 100 YEAR 184
BELOW 9Cg1R DEPTH I FLOOOPWN ELEVATION -190.86 FT.
J
OFA s is
182DEPTHS
r hzcr 182
_- - 1. DRAWING SHOW'S ENGINEER
NOTA ACTUAL
DE 1' OFF TONUS DEPTH
-STRUCTURAL o+GaEER TO ACTUAL DEPTH OF FOOTINGS.
2. SCOUR LR{i DRAWN +ATH 21 SLOPE
180 Li FROM SCOUR DEPTH. 180
47+20 48+00 48+2D 48+40 48+60 48+8D 40+00 40+20 49+40 49+60 49+80 50+00 50+10 50+40 50-M 50+80 51+00 51+20 51+40
PROFILE VIEW
f-20' HOMONTAL
r-2' VERTICAL
Ct~
h5 0
O
t`
1�
PCN EXHIBIT MAPcis
8
W
_ LliiiQ
Malo: COUNTY M ooNTom
V 'y rn
SURVEYED CONTDM
�n
— — PROPERLY BOUNDARY
CL O
-
•••••••••••••• us" 5""mc "ERm
._ U
— — — 100 -YEAR FMA FLOOOPLAIN
— 50D -YEAR MA FLOODPIAN
185 w SIIEAY BUFFER
PROPOSED CONTOURS
RM PRONE SOLS
w
L e
lZi
REVISIONS
0757NG WETLANDS
LOD MIS OF DMU BAKE
SF SLT FENCE
z
+a)
CL
O
— o-- c TREE PROTECTION
Civ 2 r
kn
61 BUFFER RPACT
3�
uh
:
102 fim
1. NO 001MRUCIDN EQUIPMENT MAL BE PERIATTED TO Qt066 THE
D ISIAIG CHANNEL OF 9N BRANCH. VOW D TO BE COMKETED
FROM NORTH OR SOUTH BANNS
L VM ELEVA7 0 0 900 ON MOM AND BOARDWALK ARE TOP
200 OF DEM( MATWIIS. SEE STRUCTURAL DRA%WM
S DOUBLE SLT FENCE IN STREAM BUFFER.
195
192
188
166
184 E%TF)IDED 1 FT. - I - - EFE .M� 100 YEAR 184
BELOW 9Cg1R DEPTH I FLOOOPWN ELEVATION -190.86 FT.
J
OFA s is
182DEPTHS
r hzcr 182
_- - 1. DRAWING SHOW'S ENGINEER
NOTA ACTUAL
DE 1' OFF TONUS DEPTH
-STRUCTURAL o+GaEER TO ACTUAL DEPTH OF FOOTINGS.
2. SCOUR LR{i DRAWN +ATH 21 SLOPE
180 Li FROM SCOUR DEPTH. 180
47+20 48+00 48+2D 48+40 48+60 48+8D 40+00 40+20 49+40 49+60 49+80 50+00 50+10 50+40 50-M 50+80 51+00 51+20 51+40
PROFILE VIEW
f-20' HOMONTAL
r-2' VERTICAL
t`
1�
PCN EXHIBIT MAPcis
4-0
Z z
_ LliiiQ
Malo: COUNTY M ooNTom
�
G! c
SURVEYED CONTDM
�n
— — PROPERLY BOUNDARY
CL O
-
•••••••••••••• us" 5""mc "ERm
._ U
— — — 100 -YEAR FMA FLOOOPLAIN
— 50D -YEAR MA FLOODPIAN
185 w SIIEAY BUFFER
PROPOSED CONTOURS
RM PRONE SOLS
w
L e
lZi
REVISIONS
0757NG WETLANDS
LOD MIS OF DMU BAKE
SF SLT FENCE
1 3/30/16
_ _ SURVEYED TRmw
GARY STAGING AREA
................ PROPOSED BACIMAM EASE1k71T
— o-- c TREE PROTECTION
61 BUFFER RPACT
OMEAA O 9PACT
20 10 0 20 40
Date: 5-15-2016
C-3
SCALE I"=29

Bridge & Boardwalk Construction Drawings

1-5
LI/SZ/Z:alpQ
I SNOISIAN I
O CU
Z CD
C 0 �•
V�
0 -G CD
Z V Q
Z
rrt
Z
n -S
N CD
-v
CD
(.n
IrD
rD
41,8nils
Eu13OSSU41 offlushl
x91,
Elm:
Tj
l0? �
O b
Zrs
HW
ko 1b /1
b? C
00
p v r
O 14041 n
'81107.0,0" x HIM4 MY377.0-S0I9 ass)
SNB
'OT ,6,05 x WON bya-0 .40,401 Y 3S1OlbB
'P40TOW SY 5WIP041'2 '-MIS 6N1hS* L VT7 MI 512XOId WOUtUA 16wr*"
21aNIN07 '9SELL em"Q'21 3501218 Nvrllsa® -MVV C7aAOlbu, NO
'W*Par 70S 39026 M73lNCY7 AB Ir 'A10 7VI01) 34,ardO TEUS'23104/bBVt3bd
asuw a1Y X'N?1alNC9
W.71VN6 119 >b N11G6 hNMLttH�3 6ac11TJf9 aB 3.06
a bB 0,V x/vm.20bv5 wllow
NIB ii`IL w0 N1LON S11111A W? 532T M 1 -:UW,31IV 012
11Y2ad SNKiIInB aLL bOd SN)AVd ""V.0
9NI:OId W7w 37a1910.%Qw SI No.LvVWIND7
3007 910'11(1331 VLS VNI"40bV7 1311104 3U CNV 3OIl0YNd NOu'XP11G1,M COOS RL"
-OW" tl0'771' M 0RVVSS 17" IMU 'CWbON7NY '�IYLd W 7'M15 SL39,,ai TTd
3007 61140'111'78 2d1 .0 601M NOUSAW AG aawvgb SY
38 01 311, S70U11313b C®1V3a
2u vww au NO 3s" u0 =CN 959M
wvj b ilM"MH LAS Gs1VMU ab755aad 39 771+5 9N4WW 0105 7W
'NOU'XILl1F107 woo bow hmVOld173d5 N5M53a wwu VN. NOuv17091Y
SLa'170Nd.LSQWW 7VN0uVN 311 HIM AleW07 771,15 SNW Vbd WOM'21706 TM
a1TTU'b CRY SbMVM dPS*W dMW arVS
SHSYONi Civ SMVNO >W'00 Y
S1NILr' SNLLVbaN24W T'3bab 6
NOuvl7.;WO
b/V a7NYl W3 Ol SYdbv IKWK W ONY 2HId WObd NOu V133.3n bY777 r
mw7ws
29albe all HObw 56Wddozio lW ONY Mare aN 1ma's mw 1.TW /
22OW-a )w olooraud
77W6 -W0' allA '1'M171dd1a HUY 6d1-tu 250771VW H -M 51 SNI71Vlaa dl 'abllslo"
dvbu NVO 1,131 527,,317 HI 1Y63b A76Y11/�all 9dOLL72dAO7 0131-408 5118KH40O
'Lads SNlbau V3N SN'Nla' bow sasissw 04Y 5104 SLIOe 3aYb9 911119'2 lLV3l136n
'6dVb1-M-MG10" alOAV
Aau 37N1$ a7BVN343Nd ab'.' sa734 SMMUNOO 2101,796 NOI MQM MMR73b
3aNOdld CNV SINll 7 SNIA077V 3 U N1M'?V1a,' 019d 341 35%0411 A7/I61'76Fw7r
'104 7V1ad 3SVe a317ad au aSM7a8 Sa7a•155Vd 375116 bow -x;svi 6 o57v 3bW
SaDO 9397VNOUN3MO9'Sap411(9 CLAY AxlMl 55Yd'LLYN d1,'7 O17Y1-4436V8
3U I11,X1 5w, 1pu15LMJo7 -04)9.1117 Y o Sacicw�" 01 N71M5 aw*15
im 'a'HN aU d0 AC70B 3U i3.J' w 530041,6739 74NOu18N107 3571 NV7 smao-a A
Aull816bCu SHL 631VN11,1173 IGA."
SC773•4 3111 d0 6N/1V-413Nd B66VSd Sa94 au 40 sNUI'7YN7 C73XIa11-N35ONaLH
d0 aC"*M 117 2!1 35V3b-Wl NVO 5/37 N249fId 241 '513MS 7YWUMZ 10J NV4u
(5/.3'7) S37Mh 17171,/413 NOQW`9 baleN 3/,V71 ATWN$99 S%MS SNIN3uVa4
'61Y d0 NOuV7Y7b7o CNV 3 NNIYW Naacwd Mary al. 92101
dam•+ aOLnONd bo '31619sCu N3M Sa9D 9+' FBLs 36'LL .7V3S lmvoa=ll l V
SNINIYI6 Hood Y8U 17alObd 01 s1N2\'1/73V CAN sT!Id
dv2M 77V97a 5201:1%ISNOO'a3L1YdW132W S" MV9B au wl 16Y3NY C739vw41M1
ZU HOIVW OA GV44 -OW VNUVd a,1 7LLN7 W711CH 21Y3ddV TM T33IS AII1aiLVa4
3LL S#4bEKW 'Ce -104W MO aMW'LG SNOB 511 311104 7pIS 3 u 6N/6VMVa a1OAV
TYH6 SWMOb 'NC41717N15NOO ~V ktWU al 141VUS TM YNUVd 3/41' NJd 341
'WWO NAONB-31dM7 ?rAb'.Y2 1,a V NI V11Y 7704 83L5 3131' u "V H 7
371 NO 9NIa6d3O SbYaA 3Md Ol CML NI 'SHbOd VNLLVd 3U SV tQ:Wya TM bo -0o
3131 dZA240H WW0 NI N40 -36NYb0 >Oa7 A77VUN1 52POW 1331.5 SN/b3LLV3-I
""L"'o
SbOlOVNLNOO jt/)Su OS b0 IS.I 91 - (uw '9VSV b0 C4CV Aust/ ae TMia -mals N215 -SMI
'77016 MU -W"
WVI-M1 NOw Naadsll3-Plwuaws 311 M 66104,1'2 dols ON NOIlO32H 1113515
291'ud+5 311 Ae C13A117ad6 V N1OUICNOV !013 YOAM9 -mw a. N/
(89138 NVO IVNI 5'®!9 A017,44al HISOAMUS WIN
'11,15531-1015019.17
Olbau9]kLV 1,104 C81V7R6vd as Ol 3NY 6850as F9L5 CHba$!l5413-3Nd
.(66096 5-BIV1511,) 55WIMM9 -MLS 71'b7L�WS
6004 NOLIVOId173d5. NOU2wsuOo 7$LS w0 a"USNI NW71294V
.,UII1M 99NVCAl000V N/ 73315 wbvu2rejAG 77V 17313 CNV 31V71N8VW
IMUS 7edu'oA"
NOLLVo129VW
CU bolbd NQlAab aCw N371,51'a 7vbru IVW5 341 of ssmww dos IM875
VML-3HYIa nV6 9Y 151711V IV
'dod 4Errw A77v01W103d5 s1, ala 9moo 37,rk"l 19Vv N/ SaJr kfs TN dV7
VaNuo" NOJ .6 3B TMs 6NV9 aQAO N3/VA7.712b'MOO b " '09 2aY2,19
'S19V "LSV Ol SNMbOd'g '732LS 12TW 04M aB 77M75 Sbt/6 W:A,O Gd
'616 r7V '.5-MIU7ws alab-Aov C87so-N13N
5NfllV130 NOB 27U9Vkd a2NafY1S JO 7VW17L 1Q1Y7 -4ll Hl M a7WYO1000Y
NI 20 77VH9 ZUS S N15W.3d1321 V SWW'A7 aN NO11V7/N5'Vw'9NITIV1aO TN
'CWVW NW0261 NO NO N3LVM Nl 31aa`T9771SY7 ION Oa
(d0d S -A)
d9d Sill =JO JN9134 IRV V NLM 3Lgb!` O 1H91a4 -M9.1138 01 61 CNV Isd OGOY do
HUS 9?US 3APFS9MaiV V AVO 9L V 3^YH 01 S 11841/9, aSOFdG HM/ IV 3Lqb'.I107
'(dad 5
/+).r d Ski 40119/3•7IAMI V HIM aLgwvN071H98.174*M 32 aN 15d ov"
ae TWHB SSNUOVGj b'YJ 3L32r.Nf7O >O HiStEWS aAJSS3NcH07 AVO VC HI1h0M"
'CMUU 1'Gd ION aW SLRS 30IbO717 6WI1YIN02 SRMLXIHOV
W6 WAPG -!VMIY 15 aU AS CHnONddV ae 157"
6db71XW0V ANd ' 6511'270413 NOd 2121+1407 lYfl717n2tLs bow 910LLV7u1't13S
706 19v CNV :319WWOJ CBONOa fab N0J SL186NM403N 3000 sWia7M6 '916
O'/ HIM as vl3b%"7V NI aaOVu CNV Cm,M 'C810LLb0i0Nd 3e TMIS alaN'a1o7
M aMJNo7
'910uYa8d4107320 aN NOUVJ, J
a7Yd29Mm WNOLL10a1, Wd 710r fr b23.13ACN a Lva 1960,10L 'ON
1NCu2N NOUVW'64K3 a'N la S 'TNI I-LWITK..N07 NO'WMM 01 2461
YQaILa4 b01701d CRNCNVI9) 9b9-0 14 LSV HIM 37NVC4J077Y 1
CM04waL3a SV Al1S1TO Ala "WWW 11,97ZHd 9b d0;w" V Ol C731T+dLJ07
ae 77"612W Skill 35001 H'NIXV" A N1 12r.Wld 2G 77,46 771d TIY
'304HRMO cela1 9saw aC7V1e Ci31611,11d
hlcrw .91 d0 Wi1NM V 3B TV15 SB110ow avrali a TN w0 "211OB 3u
Tia aa6b'LLSKN7 914 T d NJVad al
dl S6T'khll'b0 35241
NO 1MVN1 290HI NYHI Nouv/3Ol H "401 V C911bV9 3B l7VHS SBMLOCU
321 SNO/11CNO7 a7VWb'65n5 AbOlOvwSLLObTd'1 dl baamRmg 7VWu01ws lvvlN07
'w5d aasr SNui#ld's AP -NS d7 37@,417 7105 NO 1S3b 77VH5 9WU00w 771,
5NOI w"Inw
4NM 70N1NO N95a0 112H1V7
o I 7 V"-1 ft
abYla370bd S15A7Vw
6Wa
•.1 AMvfwd300391Cus3N 7A490s
or$ PO
NOloVd Nouvo1dl7J4Y NOLL'Jd7d3a
OSI
.6-0 bolovd H1ALidLL5N3,70 Y@15A5
orl
b 1N3!'J439Ja N1OUVoW:4 1 391Qda11
(RWli19940.4d A91M(L
�7d5 x'107 '7107
M31SA5 SNLISIS.DJ' �E75
1431516 7v2*U 1sfo K41
7
AW92LY0 N953a 911,6136
Vero
106 1N3YRi6OO 35NOd53b 7v2u03d5
rsro
say 1Na01WW3073sradsda Tlwoa s
a
9SV79 ams
SVOO
cwro
5 NOLLVb7$77V a5NOd53b 7VbIU CSdd"4
9$' NOUVb Ww 25N045aw 7v117ads C13ddw
001
I WAWd 9.wwl CUMl '7&5135
' V1Ya avo7 7M605
564 ROW wad
6NIaOV V / S1N3197.4400 aVW a21'7653bd M
B
01
2p1Oe'd 37fN121Ctlt.11 a1M
113'1 61,
(56L 37rY) C93.15 CNM N9530
' VIVO OVO7 CLAIM
w5d 9
OYM MONS NBNiwO
.sd 61
CN07 MGNS nOOb 1,21
rl
NCUO'Vw 1,13,6'21/1
al
2O17Vd 3' wild.. 04'21,07 ), U
OI
456,91
balova a2Ns0.1k3 HOW
OVOI MO.Y Q4'lob9
' V.Lvo 00771 MONS
WSd Ob
NO l'" e00M WOO 2M1 bCOld
dOd OS
OVO7 OV2a WOW aCg4
6'2V07 lowsw
II
AavGaLY7 A7NV'dTYO
NOUK13 rKW - 2007 SN1a7M9 aLWS V170bM HINON
2m7
35M2e1-110 aucw 96RW 'ON'n
SNILOOd 3o aol 'dal
Naalm a1u MOTH, NN3un05 LAS
a3Lv3bL 3 ld
294315Yw BIWUVV alit u '".I
b3UB7 NO '400
97V"S OU ICN 'SIN
AYM 17,2 Ala
1slor a737aa ra
baLr137 01 291NW an
x756 01 N9ve am
1708 b010N 8V
SNOILWall9w
'S21'.11Vd3NOSK1 ANY dO 2133116711- TV WU22US 241 WLLCW CNV AOV7YY77V
bOW 95NIANLKI a5au NO lAYN6 940111,2 0 6NUSIX3 (08475,6,) TV JYA77
157" bolwdINOO 341 Allll9 Sb� T 4m -.,l w6 aHl d01bVd
101 3bV SOPR a410 a 2W w0 NOLLY01WR9n aU aW 5u81aa'Sb34 a91d
SINGa 1'170 19VNLN77
341 H1104 2'NVab077V NI 19OW NOLLO'2USN07 341 11 ANbYO 01 abn7Nd
Sbal.9wbUXY7 3u NOW 3781 25 31 TM NON'A2tclq 1VOu7YR1L5N07 341
'M N0119.1 0 NI SHVNSYA W CLAY SJOU(Wg9Nd A13dvS bOw 10 %,-zWk22Waw
NO 52201095 V=TVINH731 VOOLLN SNY31 NOUOr W9407 w0 70NMOO
3NYN 101 77H 04Y WOw 9WIP LUS2b 1CM S bGGNISTH iYblt7lINLS all
')-31SAS N0LY0476J aIVINdom k.1v
341 CNV 94OII1CNOo au UvyrpvlQ Ol as waw 28 alms
2581WSr13 67105 Y'CHb31N'O'>t8 3bV SM3"NO?d dl 29440 NO N017YN1NO7 au
AS 3B ISM a ssaad 5wwy B 37B1A10TA' 6N1 S310N 7YMUV VWS
.NOUVC2*703, 341 NI NtiOM' SV aanssaNd fiNIbY3B 37H,M077r' 47ai7sw
N1, NOW C8SV6 S WlSaa NOUV@MOd 3U 'I1S7VI03d5 57106 V 1CN
SI W NOUVSUS Wl 37Ydi1'15?7K V -4JO0 ICN SYN 2591K.a.3" 7VWU-; S 3U
aU N"U T8u0 -4109.405 J UH SIS9N SN'ld 7Vb71';rWs 3041 NO N401r 1CN
568LSAS 7V2M';)V 115 -NON CLAY 1Y21717/R115 ANY010735 AW NCW AU71lmlo.9 N
.IWW O31aN 51Na103100 3U NOJ 1d37Xw "3/6115 w2or 1a'P11S
ANYHINd 9U dO NB15303u bOw5125011913'Wmu-,x LL53131
'NOuvMG CMP/ NOuvOlbeVd OU No1Nd M3U,3N Nod N7H0
241 01Caugxm au
15(" sLNaILb4p7 R'2MIL,Irw5 au w0 Hwa bow 5511MNbo
d0`5
'sb-47d3S 7Y/aWYN FU do A MGr 3!1 3NY I%M0,1 36341
NI 0NV 65NAA'21O 2011 NO 4731CN SY) N9159a -tabu-;Yl Ls 3NL d0 S1oadod
'N3l'kA.M 390818 aU d0
Auld au S 5390126 C IB18-aNi 201,6 w0 191520 7YXu7rws au
'dlN1 O -MW HOVa
6NMC7770d bl 1V VNU/07 au CU 009 3B T1114" d2a 79Ndtl NOUCVWQ1O'.7, V
'4-461179^.13 311, 943'11ilObd
N40LL'17b15NOO
NO N95aCl 1841 NCN10lRI15NO7 d0 25W15 ANY 1V '6
'm7wu6NI abV 53bAmw 031YJ?1BVdy}Jd
3LL abl . VMSAS WY 047 VRLLS a11.10 NM-r.W107 217ldV Z
wlI w aL3Nallo7 abo m MYl®b SNLL00d do 11243'X41 b31dV 'I
':INa4 all d0 M3UkW O'Hld V MW 10U'XN19100 d0
539V15 ~49TO! aU IV N33415N3 7Vb71'X6d1S 3U AdUM 1SH N019Vb1N09
341 10,11109 b70 d01NYd V OGW adv 534011# .11131/11 NOU' LQgo%
199'ONd Sou bvYJ ra.'MVw 9NI:IN0/ 1Yb71'X0IL5 3131 CHN1'd]Nd
CLAY N953O 7Y2Yu' IS au C7a2YJdN3d Gv" Yd %,3LYY.IOSSV s moYS -;
$39LR®S S MOMPOSM I1 ML22:116.0 2d0'X
'Noa2w6107 9NIAxl "u'vrw5 au 37/718,15
Ol 901'J,b9 . TN 3O1fON3 TMs 1010YNL00 au PQ" 139191d4A7
511 NI ITO CNAo5 ATAMIL'X2 L5 9 6B1MV160 3941 NO N-145 aYi 7RLLS 3131
'S1A9 Bb1'SYai avu ANY96avm
TW aW1 CNV'2814 3141 NI SNOUICNO7 T7V A.N7$, TM16 NMVVWNPP
'910LLY71dY78d6 CNV SNYId MINV1Y91o7 a1Vlb ob.6v
au of 20VW W1S" 3a�' aN alYNTT7, ae 01 IMPMW aB ION 'rMs
AaLL 5,61313"8"'M0
341 Ol 'I*SWUV"13b 7,71'268 NI 0470/16 1®B
aAIW 590104,10 "Ilr On115 aU No IMVO a l slr♦3}373 7vbu'Xwv-NCN TV
NV7"s 771, NO -4 7W96" C73b3019107 a2 TMlS N40s 57!1,139 CLAY SNOLL738
55NMVNO A3 v
CNV SHOuv01dr7a sla HUM Nou'TYIN07 NI 59NMV1a 1V27'UXws 397
?65 all dO 04055041'27 N3111b 4 aLL IrCWAW
Uwom .vu d0 S10u7aism Hbowwd NO S11B4Y�rxf NQu7 WGN00 asau 01
QOY NO a,a-m 35U 1'AMp7 7UR-k" 7 A,H'241W'AL5 V
IoN w Nau3M',uav o bau0 CN '3bvdp alv J13dVs'fuwa" 0179lu Ol
6NUV'HN Gonw2bl 7Vb7La7N15 au d0 aaWH4K1JN3d 3LL NCu ILU-Yx lswW
11'937 —ow (136) 40140'111-40-2 11518 7V2/7L 31,11917'2/14014
241 SI SENO WW -MaU /240 Sb1'3ddV -WW 35014 SRW#AQ 7 NOI(3;3d0Nd aU
535041'1 Nauo NOw @5vk)vW}7N =G WN TNI5 CNV 103^014
64U NIM A -GWS 297 NOW 'Yd S3LVI'XT35V f L5Y'�•17 w0 AIMMOX d
ll
a3NY'37N289 lYNpSQdpNd >b S178YFJ 15Ni SV SSNA'NNO 35341
7,WSNM5
8933IYJS%l0Li3B'J6ff93ri4Zt0L9Y9'.01 �u3 ug5n»0

Dll gn E—. ,ID'. -70322- 4-39GBEFi#9960 7-9
TOMO POST
�� rrPrcaL Bgcrror. rr,N ov�RLa�K Pl.a7F01lPT
�� 914' SOACE
p/FDE
CENTER OP POSTS
ANVPOST GAP
Aon RAILING
ONTER OF POST5
AND F105T OAP
6' POST
EMEN5r01i —
PALE
r CIOL5LE STRINGERS Y r
r 3 �cE hif U
G/IP
I _
PDsr
/
- B. ho " SNP. P. T,
STRINGERS • 17' 04. -
--
OU dW SAUD5 CR LVY LONBSR
GTRINSBRS, AND DELETE INTERIOR SAND
--------------
OXD N
f, r. (TYP.N
_
_ -
I
1
I
I
j
I
h
�
I
I
1
1
1
--------------
I
1
I
---------------
I
I
I
'-- `--------
I
�
--
---------------
I
I
I
POMST OAP 6' BEYONOUlp
OF FLOOR PANEL
4X6 S rrmiLL
RJSTTTPJ
I ''
6A0 SAND
WO BLOCKING
FOR CITTSIDE STRRJBBt h = I € I t 1
ATTK.H-61T TO GAP (� 0315-4) .,LA RTO SOAROYIALK/HR1A9E
�_ '3 _I � (_ 4' -II• 4-11' I 4' -If' � I I PLAN NT S{ffi 5-3 FOR
PLAN
6-3 FORAGINS
I
61-0' I I6`o•
�VARfES 1010' TOOSIS •t
[/( POSTS
f/i POSTS
(n l \ TYPlCaf. 04EIFLGIG7C PLATFOFe!'1 FRaFtIPLa
VI 3/4.9OALE
BOLTS AND WAS43ZS
- SEE 07,5-4 — SEE Oz” SEE 02,9 44 -
AND 07fr
r DOLME J06TS AT EDW 3M0 N SYP FLOM
"ST50 f2' OZ.
------------------
10M0 POST CAP
X-SRACE POSTS k#M LENGTH
4'-0' (SAO P.T BRACES MTH r4-0
61ALV BOLTS AND WAGWRS)0&.10 POST—
\,
�� 7YPTG4{- SECTrCN 7FpF01/^aN1 18' LC�Y BDAIFaLL4LK
��J' S/4' SGAlF
U o0
J b
n
N Of
u °p
L Z 00
b� OI
u 'a, of
v do
Q yo
h�
CU LL i co
U)
V)
�LYSRGHT©
RSSOCIRTES
.,,��ND.oI a1D..,.
12081. MbA eOeN. AaryR NC 27M
M.-&0 Woplkymlaa —
T -W. GW21
tN' O,MQ
79M
—40
rd'„•
C,pux. w. itNilf
"./2017
L V
Z
4-J 3
Z U 0
i..f. 0 or
L.
CL) Lon
Z
O
REVISIONS
Date: 2/28/17
5—=

Docu5lgn E1MI0q 10'. W6]0322-A6E&l39C-f3EFOF985G1EEB9
IDx10 N POST OM
Dpw E STRlN6FR5
4x6 I2 SYP, PT,
R.4I. F057-frrnJ
• I ao�i,�0is wr i � �.
I
I
Arlo 9OTTOM SILL PLATE
I
2110 5!LL RATE AT 8O7'Fd1
I ILWLHJ rOIRL"B2 slue aP
smfN6s25 Aro av EwND
I
I
10 STRItY�P.S
�C8 B2BI.al:INB TEM STRIN6PR
r srwrrRs
I •
� I
I
M
J - O
�
3x10 5]RIN6ER5
• r .c. PT)
I
` 2�
i o Qy
• �
210 DECK RANCS
y ro OI
i
cc
I
=
I
2r10 aMO AT
ec M&M P.r.)
- 2x(0 BAHT AT
L� M2 5YP P.rJ
H
I
W� O M
(p V Iv z o0
(n � �. a
I
I
I
z
ASSOC HT©
s
4
I Q
I
I
1200.Ma/s IA9e4Id6Uit NC 27606
919,BJS0690 INOgMrMOCpRLCarI
I
I
I
An NP I
I
I
:QP gN_ f
790! ? -
I
2/28{2017
I
L
J
2nD DECK RAVKS L
O
I
J
TIM 5YP PTI
`\
`FYJS75 A6[J HYr LAP
ArrACH DECK BOAQ05
-06T Yf1TH (SM6d
N 5YP P.rJ
u' YIDS x I'-0' LONG x M• THICK
Gl.WGt2E7E roorllFi, TTP.
TD EACH
6ALVAN ED RW6
J/
MAU aW CLIP t5ff DETAIL o7,ss1
SW FOR6 ON
-41AW NAILS A2
NKLAR SIZE
SECTION
SCREN.5
"
POST AVD CAP
ISb' Le667N
F05r A/O
b'-0'LENBni
'
CAP
^� 7YpIGAL �' LC71JG x 1®' WIDE B0,4RpW4LK
`a' -ALE
�� T7'P16:.4l. 19' LGMY
V
z t0' I11DE A0.4(�WALK
S/4• SCJdF
GRG880JG-�'
BFJ06E
Mil. 6~ Pet
HANDRAIL DETAIL
cerAiL 6F)9:4
FIER PETAL 02-S-4
C.ONTRAC.TVR TO OETSiWW Af4%W
Gr= PILL OR EXGAVATICN OF
PEOESTMAN BRIDW
A ,
EXST(NS GRADE
V/
.� CCMGRe1E
;I
fiLE X-0RACfIVb, TIP.—_
I
I
�
8.i.
Etsvar�orl ar BOARDWdLK +c
n'-0' � 's' -o• I
rs`°'
�
Is`°•
�
'°`°" �`"4"
�
,
z
Z 0
_a
V4'SCALE
Z
O
�: V
ffO•O' BRyel.
1041•
`+
HANDRAIL DETAILMTAIL
GUARD PB2
•
02-5-4
Qi VI
p
�,� B,
REVISIONS
PIF x-9RAGfNS TYP.
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 2/28/17
IDx10 N POST OM
Dpw E STRlN6FR5
SECTION C.6lT TM'0/ IPALL AT 190ARONALK
C�'� IS SIfM6AR AT CQITlN.bIFi
aa6aeowwe exce�r Sono F1.LL' R .r�Ysr.
• I ao�i,�0is wr i � �.
I
I
Arlo 9OTTOM SILL PLATE
I
2110 5!LL RATE AT 8O7'Fd1
I ILWLHJ rOIRL"B2 slue aP
smfN6s25 Aro av EwND
I
I
10 STRItY�P.S
�C8 B2BI.al:INB TEM STRIN6PR
I
I
I •
� I
I
IDx10 N POST OM
Dpw E STRlN6FR5
SECTION C.6lT TM'0/ IPALL AT 190ARONALK
C�'� IS SIfM6AR AT CQITlN.bIFi
aa6aeowwe exce�r Sono F1.LL' R .r�Ysr.
--
- —IroSr (rep)
—10x10 N SYP
P.T. P05T GAP
3x10 5]RIN6ER5
• r .c. PT)
I
I
• �
210 DECK RANCS

D—Sig, EmnxP. ID'. 616)0122-ME6AJ5C--]-0Fg85CATEE65
1z10 EMb 6.4111
2b'
U o0
SAO J01575 . 121 O.G.
J
I'4
AO•I'-Y
9•
NOT
CL
fSEAn
u °p
64
L Z W
•
r
�
TTACH TOP RML wilt S'
SOI.NIE DR/VE w'JOD SG�YG.
I�xIY ro5T aw — txlz H.wticMaE ne eT a'rv.�at
AT ALL INTERIOR JOISTS
L 41
V
(12 CTS. 5TAddERM)
TExreMo P097 LM 6" BEYOND
2xro DECK BD.N¢C�i N7T Ons10E Elise OF B0AR014ALrJ
i •�
�y
n
1�2
I I$
I
.11711 SETPo®t RAILS
, ,
cc
;•exro• AML'.1CR saLn
[bolo'CLEAR
PLAN VIEWam
2'
-
U a
0
IfSEi DETAIL O6S4 FOR
ADD/r1OWL
'
PlrcicD NAIL
L d
fN M�
IT
4• MPJ
�4
'i•
O1
HOLD
I
7ia6 C01Po31TE TOP RML
F
/^�` a
W t'
ABOVE A9/RCHT sEA7
2x4 a 4,w IP.TJ
_
__ 2x4 AN7 am RALL
co
'^
aa6.9JPPVRTI-,21-87JV
to � 3 01
4A a STr ROOTS
S e10 JOISTS
4x4 neAN9nON RAIL- '.+SAI.V. LAS SCREW
•1-+ .4
r 41
. K -x 51-01 IP.TJ
'�'1 .J AT ®6£,CISTSI
ATTACH TO OUTSIDE Nnt WASHER (CG(.NTERSIHK
J• --- -
FACE OF .EEL BUARO FEAR Alb WASHM
V /
IDx10 of STP P.T.
AHD `X'�'E
�T��
�4 7
\
-�yV
� _
---
� LYSflGNT©
D
I
I
2a6a3TP(F'.JJ-IL4ILTOPOST
�f-------------�`1I
� ^
Z* MAIL
ASSUCIflTES
.T11(31/6d 6ALV. NAILS
_ ._ _n
,.,1t THW
nglneer.
6ALV. L5x9 VW14.41/2'AT
1�'•EiOLTVS
Ims.nbAaree�
efr�
dRSFACE OF DOUBLE H115E
STS 61 -*d SALV "L (1)�5[4'kl4' FLATCS w]N
age e�y
gI v.BJ]AMPo l vaioclwaRlaxn
ixn Nw CLW I
_ `-dALVANIZ®.RE 1E5H ATTACH TO — 6ALVAWED wRE PESH•
'-
-W TSII
(44V nm BOLTS (ELAN)
B'
POSTS Alb BACK 510E OF RAILS 1. SQVME OPEWNISS W IV4 OR
wTH SAL VAHLEW STAPLI3 Aff.OW 025" .RP DWIETER
SPACE POSTS 6'-01 OL. LPDER POST
I
HOLD 6' CLEAR TO AVOID
GAP. (4-O' OFF GL3ITERLIME OF T 415'
f3� TD BEN -RAL IF -k7AO P.T.PPOST M SYPJ (17/
BRYXaFJ REFER
s rPPR WTERl�HICE NTN
SLOGK (4x4,1 GpNEGnON TO POST LAP
,.,..o.�,•.�.•.•.1, ..
H GM1
k
A/O 501-5 REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL. SPACED AT bb' O.G. AT EACH
POST CAPD
-
°."•.r• y. ESS ,�'Yy'•'..
p.
?xb a STP fP.TJ
(WORHAnC YI ON P75M
2m TOE BDAiID
n7E BOARD 1xro N STP. DE K
15'4' CENTERLIW-ceNTERLIME ISb' CB/T®PLIIEACEi TBfa-i E
6 A?D
-
r
1 &GUARDS IP.TJ
I I 1
7YOB
�L
m
sp
1L
ry� --2xro R SOP. FLOOR
JOISTS. 13' OL. fP.TJ
f1LYD • TCLl3WY.E
•� EET;IERH 'xOD AMC'
4'••..,�1 W. �,.••',
„ n...n...,.•
II 11 O
ry
V
ry
O
IIO' tr STEEL AT IN50E OF SHOE
(7)3x10 ovr5m 57RINSOR O t2a, anym STRINFm
y.1r
Y
S' ----_
� LL
'
M
� 5
C�..r
L
MA AM
#1 TIMCX
DOV� IN
LTe/2o1]
DOLBLE .YM$TS 1x10 a STP. IP.TJ BLOLKIW BE,YHit
AT EASE FLOOR MISTS NmR C@nBt POST
MADE (411'0 THIRD ROD
SIDE RATES AN'JIOR BOLTS (BAC VJ
ES
SEE DETAIL 03 FOR OVTSIOE
LOCATIONS WITH GGtnMUD15 2x4 ALONs
1—
IAdO R75T jhisrR TO POST _
I
I
Y &ALV. BOLTS wTH TO EACH BLOCK AID AT ED COLULEBOTTOM (HAIL 214 NTH 16d SAW a
HORMZ. COS®
CONNECTION AHD POST TO POST
'�� &Ont 5DE5 JOISTS; PLATE71S
110'OL. It 11 2' CLR. Q>?
LAP LO1dFSTKN
e LONR FOOTINS W HEED®
TO FOE, M MW BEA.WHS
SOIL OR TO GET WN*t"
MEOW 9GOLR DEPTH
n 4
HOLD MIMMM•I 70'9• CLEAR .0.
THIS IIAI"IA1L DETAIL 15 TO BE 1.6111;ie Ew
BETYEEN WIVRALLS / w®.16ALRD5
ADJACENT 6R, -,De is a 90' eELow TOP OF
i1
-
DECK. OTHERWISE USE DETAIL 06/5-4.To
n
_
Be
rSy64 DONT B t
2b• At T-0' 04
., TIGs. 24'' DL
1
rrMCAL. SECTIONC W-01 LOW,
TYPICAL BOARDWALK SECTION AT POSTS
DETAIL AT GUARDR4IL TO 14 N R4IL CONDITION
SDE x
1V�./} 1• sGALE
1• SCALE
®
EETM�I M495. SUAFM
'
--
------
�
1 I
SGM:'Bt BLOCK
�• �P
--- -
e..V
4x6 EMD POST (112 sTP P.rJ
OR USE Nom- 6VA11 IF
,J, s.
46•
WmE X 12• DEEP X 1216•
1 I
I 1 69ADE PERMITS
2zO FLOOR PLANKS STP
�r �(ieOUb
j-# srAtH.6S SE5-
^ l
W
TIT FOOrWs.
LONG AEUEN
I i
TCP TWD EP6E51.
AAFICRAFT CABLE
Z
PLAN
VIEW
I I W -O' LOHs CR0551Ns4-a
#'. N7LE IN POST
I I i I 4.4x0• S(A•PFM BLOCK a P.r. BT
1'AACK
OF BROdE
1tA1.1 FlBsttr MICLLDES 111 N!IBMT
5TTdGrWE M 2 1,2' FOR
SO12' SACJ04AU eACI04ALL
I I IF BOAROYA.K GROS6IW 16
4
BEARM
PLATE AND MCN-SHtW BRWi
y I I PRRSHIP AMOARDS P ETD OBCK B
11
I I
—2x6 CCFPOSITE TDP RAIL
L V
LOW TO ALLON INSTALLATION OF
MCkMJR BOLT NT3
11
U
I I
U
I
—1x4 a sYP IP
Q
Z
05
�O
E . c'
1`Y
I I
0124KZ smo OR r
� z
MI
-74P GRADE
1' 4EAT TOP
Ax amo se 05CK
SEE DETAIL LGMTNCI5 i i 2x10 w SOP. P.T. DECK BOARDS (NAIL
DOUBLE 2xro mBE ,XI�T5
by SLPPoRT IBIEVBBb/
W O
(4'M4' MEAD
TO
TOP OF WALL
1
_ -
U50+4 zdO ByD
NMI& AQ SRMLAR SIZE 5CA�61
W =
o
_
°
...I _.
�
°d STEEL amosE
d I
d I 1 (4YXf2' dAL V.
AALV. H SCL
SLRB'L5 AT EACH 5GA9`%i BLOCK % a, LY GLlGRETE WALE.
LOCK
fN PRE -GRILL® LEAD NG.f'3 J a SEE DETAIL ON5-s
y
n1
^
ii o
-1T1�a°
jj�jj
n
' d I AIY.110R BOLTS WTH
° I
—BALVAW2®14IRE h6f1 ATTACH TO
POSTS Alb BACK SIDE OF RAILS
• (,
�..
I W --*M BE OF SECTION
I wI i F_I I e bW-06T5. 12. 04.
°
wTN SAL VAW2® STAPLES
L v V)
EXISnW BRACE
��'O
SPACE INTEMKVure 50-fFER
BLOfJ:S AT MWt/MW 5•-01 oc.
2x6 a STP (KT)
z
Q
P SMI. HALM TO EKAf
NTH MW OAL V. 1MI1TOE,BOARD
TC N STP. DECK
u
d i e.
S• 114
.10Sr
If AID r0 LSD BAD . 12' D.C.
r-2XA0
i BOARDS (P..TJ
11 I I
el
dl
? 11
REVISIONS
° °
A � SMTS
1 e ---AT--
CONG:ET2 OR n OF 10' wDE x 10' LOW BOARDPOL c
ALL DRILL1H65 TO BE ON
CRREi3ME OF NOELex1aRD
Al
ROLAS EN es VBtr. BARS - ---'
GCNSTR.OnON d • 12' 01C,NTH
°
EPDXY AMKHOR3 CROsSIW 6LO*xt -4kII10' LC"NS
(SI14 LOMTNJOL S BARS.
AND SLLPPBR BLOCK. AL16N
OUTSIDE ECCE OF GUARD
Alb BLOCK
ABLOCK NTH OUMVE
..I.1
ry r —
17IHr OF (�/ Pa.RS) < 1MWM1A7 LOv1fR -
19 TEs • 12' OL.
EDBE OF DOI.ELE .Cllr
•
1
1
I O'
d
r da Q
RE
CCHTI s
--[:! d
Date: 2/28/17
��7m
4�
�-4
TTPICAL 30' 6PAN DRIDCf A6117f'�4T TO sats
WcTIO4 AT ROOTRG
uA'LEEL GUARD DETAIL "I -W TOP Or DECK IS
SECttON TWRII ADA OVFRLODIG RAIL
�V^ �1%
rnOad2lLLa-IC GeoseaYsJ I• SCALE
O 1..E-46 PWAN 90• TO GRAM r SCAII
O 7•,GALE

NO' -0' BRIDe9E
4-sAl- i
1
U IVT
-i ko
TOP OP I
•2dO
N
MOVE DErK DAMP
41
EL
QO
rh
Law MACK W"
tj
STRIMMe
#5 aDSW CAW 0 104' OZ -
"TH 3. COVER
200 S&L
y 'j.;
cx
L2'-O'QR
r
ADMITA.
BOLTS
ii
ij�;
CD
ko
BARS r 04. m
y r 0,
C-0
2'-0'
LYSOGHTO
OSSOCIRTES
m
91
--------------- E
v
SM
AT AMEMED 194D APD 2 FOR
CLEAN MWACE OF MOCK 50
7KAT Cow-lx7ff MILL BOND,
MOVE ArrAr� (*4' AW -40R WLT
row LEAN COWpe7E "X ON :OP
ROCK IF R96K SLOPES X5.
.............
PR"WTION MkWE AWTHBff SEAT)
. . . ...
COHMACTOR TO ARMY Acnb-,L AW+" VOLT
LOCATIONS HTH PfAL 5FWW SHOP
DIRAWI . rTMM Trrff TO HAM4 kVAT�EREV
STEEL OF 1iR06E
AWh(OR BOLTS
JO
2/28/2017
RaK
DRILL AND EPDXY ALL VERTIC,4C
FIMW HNK#.f 12, ffro SOLID
1' SCAJ.E
ROCK
r 03 CL45W C, -A- BARS
(2)05 BARS AT TOP
lHMACK "4LL
194 b' MOP OF BRU76E DECK AND
BOARDl.­KDEC4r)
•
- - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - -
- - - - - - - -
i
BACK HALL IW_U1>_E5
vi
•--------- --- - -------
-------
--------
3&'W:l6ffT OF BWOSff
S�nRe. 4' FOR BEARNAS
M.AMQV lCN-S~ 6ROVT
%do STRINSM's Do.
an 12
AT BOAFp'14LK (3)j'#Kl2' AWAqM VOLTS
--------- --- - -------
W
4 2.12 AT.
PLATE
-3 IORIZONTAL
a -IRS • Woz.
- -------- ---
------
-3 %M"C,4L BARS
011'O. Cl
1- 14 111RIZ, Cl 09W
TWO 0 w D.C.
--------- --- T ------------- - --------------------------
------------- ------------ ---------------
--------- --------------------
-- --- ---------------------------- ---------------
-7
-
----------- -- -
------------- ----- ------------------- ------------ - -----------
- ------ -------- -----------
- T ------- --- T ------------------------------------------
ANLL TO W 1110* LONIP.
FOOTAW TO BE r - 2CLM.
-
v
0
-
--------- --
------- ----- ------- ---- --- -
- - --------- ------ ----------
- ------ - -------- --- y--------- --------
u
ECt ILO' 80
REVISIONS
LO/'ER FOOTM49 AS MMW
---------- - - - -- --
---- --- ------
..... ------------ .............. ..........
. --- -
rO REAeH Ff" SOIL
W44 clopmN
-DRILL A60 EPDXY ALL VERTICAL
BARS 4 04 TW5
fiEBAR KhIK#-f D' INTO SOLID
ROCK
0 24' OZ.
- -------- --- ------- ---
4
-GRADE VARIES ,
2-'
Date: 2/28/17
A19U??,N ogrAIL At Wo'sWDGE
V $CALL
&4ALLOW PER OErAL Ar BOARDWALK L(=AtW
our as acnAw!s I'SCALE

Photo log

Turnipseed Nature Preserve
Photo Log
Photo 1- Looking Downstream on Gin Branch at approximate 120' bridge crossing
location.
k Aq
Photo 2- Looking downstream on UT to Gin Branch at approximate 30' bridge crossing
location.

USGS Quad Map and NRCS Soils Map

2
POOLE RD
Turfgss
Number
��
-
f
750 � � Y�' � , —� �� '•�
`.
KE
MYRARD
t�
ADA Dk 7—
W"
_ N �""'•--���,�,- JONATHAN DR
CLAYTON QUAD MAP
KNIGHTDALE QUAD MAP
t SHAWAN RD
BISSETT£ RD
so T
,=_250 i 30
Y r
/
AKE WENDELL RD
L -
PROJECT AREA
LATITUDE: 35.4443
LONGITUDE: 78.2413
IN
USGS QUAD LOCATION MAPWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2016
USGS QUADRANGLE
CLAYTON AND KNIGHTDALE WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC
SCALE: 1"=2000' 4806 Green Road, Suite 100 919 870-0626
Raleigh, NC 27616 FAX (919; 870-5359
G
Z -
o
Asti
FTURNIPSEED
RD
IN
USGS QUAD LOCATION MAPWAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINADATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2016
USGS QUADRANGLE
CLAYTON AND KNIGHTDALE WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PC
SCALE: 1"=2000' 4806 Green Road, Suite 100 919 870-0626
Raleigh, NC 27616 FAX (919; 870-5359

' P p Pt�F.:'. /) p L ArD A.pitL
AP C2 ApC2
/ ApB2 LoD
.,
Ap�.�, fig �, �< °''�� a. ARBl�
J
146C2 ,, , j ApC2 APB2 W
i
ApC2 i
wQ T
A
jPQM, _ Ap82 G`L �. D�- �
DuCz a ,1
Lo y you
+ LoC LoC / LoD
PQ
k DuB f� Jdo .,' �� ApB /
A 2 APC2
oC / Lo ✓1 '/�
- . Cn b �f / _
ApC2
/ 44 � M
m ApB2
---. ApC2
A >C2 Me
t
,Pp2 „�• o
L B
--�_-�-- APB2 ,
\` C21 r - LoD ��-� `~`- ApC2
b ApC2
LoC
LoD `; LoD APB" Me
^� ApC2 ApB2 1�
ApB ApD
j - ApB2 .
Akc 7 APC` ApC2 �..
J
ApB A9B2
wo Nle
TURNIPSEED PARK
SOILS MAP
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 2016
SOURCE:
USDA SCS (NOW NRCS) SOIL SURVEY WARD CONSULTING ENGINEERS
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA , PC
ISSUED NOVEMBER, 1970
SCALE: NTS 4805 Green Road, Suite 100919 870-0626
Raleigh, NC 27616 FAX [phone]

Axiom Environmental Report

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-270-9306
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
October 17, 2014
Mr. Eric Staehle, RLA
Wake County
Facilities Design & Construction
P.O Box 550
Raleigh, NC 27602
Re: Tumipseed Nature Preserve 14-016
Environmental Investigation Summary Letter
Wake County, NC
Dear Eric:
This letter is intended to provide a summary of the results of an Axiom Environmental, Inc. (Axiom)
investigation at the above-mentioned site (Figure 1). The approximately 265 -acre Turnipseed Nature
Preserve (Preserve) is located south of Wendell near the Johnston County line. The Preserve has an
irregular boundary that touches Marks Creek to the west, Turnipseed Road to the south, an unnamed
tributary (UT) to Marks Creek to the northeast, and Pleasants Road to the north. Approximately two-
thirds of the Preserve supports forest, and approximately one third is either fallow or active
agricultural field.
Wake County provided Axiom with a map depicting locations of proposed hiking trails and
boardwalks within the Preserve. During a September 18, 2014 on-site visit with the planning team,
we walked a proposed hiking trail north of the UT to Marks Creek, where we identified three
crossings of potential wetlands and/or streams subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. On
September 22, Becky Ward requested that Axiom add a federally protected species survey to our task
list.
Axiom has defined the project "investigation area" as an approximately 50 -foot wide corridor
centered on proposed hiking trails and access roads, three proposed parking areas, and three potential
stream and/or wetland crossings (Figure 1). The majority of the hiking trails and Parking Area C are
proposed for areas supporting approximately 50 to 60 year old hardwood forest mixed with pines.
Parking Area A is proposed in a young stand of loblolly pines (less than 30 years old). Parking Area
B and its associated access road are proposed for the margins of agricultural fields and a small stand
of loblolly pines less than 30 years old.

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 2
Axiom biologists conducted field visits to the investigation area on October 7 and 8. As part of the
investigation, we accomplished the following tasks:
• Section 404 jurisdictional stream and wetland delineations
o Axiom staff members visited the three crossings of potential streams and/or wetlands and
conducted stream and wetland delineations within the boundaries established by the
planning team on our September 18 site visit.
o Axiom completed stream and wetland data forms to document the delineation and stream
and wetland functional status during field surveys on October 7 and 8.
o Axiom generated a sketch map of the delineation and submitted the map to both Wake
County Facilities Design & Construction and Ward Consulting Engineers on October 9.
• Federally protected species surveys
o Axiom completed surveys for federally protected species during field surveys on October
7and 8.
Stream and Wetland Jurisdictional Areas
Axiom investigated three sites for jurisdictional areas: the crossing at the farthest north bend in the
hiking trail (north bend crossing), two crossings just below the borrow pit pond dam (pond spillway
crossing and pond outflow channel crossing), and an approximately 1500 -foot reach of the UT to
Marks Creek (UT to Marks Creek crossing) (Figure 1). Photographs of selected sites and data forms
documenting our findings are attached to this letter. Following are descriptions of our findings.
North Bend Crossing
This crossing appears to mark the beginning of a stormwater channel; and, below the crossing, the
adjacent land appears to have potential to support wetlands. An evaluation using N.C. Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance (the NCDWQ Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11)
resulted in the determination that this feature is an ephemeral channel that is not subject to Section
404 jurisdiction. An ephemeral channel typically contains surface water briefly following
precipitation events. An evaluation of the area adjacent to the channel using U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) guidance (the USACE Wetland Determination Data Form — Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region) resulted in the determination that this area is not subject to Section 404
jurisdiction. In summary, the north bend crossing does not include a jurisdictional stream or
wetland.

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 3
Pond Spillway Crossing
This is a man-made, "v" -shaped ditch constructed to allow overflow water to pass around the south
or right side of the pond dam (facing downstream) (Photo 1). This feature has been excavated in
high ground on the south side of this natural topographic crenulation. The bottom of this feature is
well above the groundwater elevation. An evaluation using NCDWR guidance resulted in the
determination that this feature is an ephemeral channel that is not subject to Section 404 jurisdiction.
During our field visit, there was no evidence of surface flow within this feature. In summary, the
pond spillway crossing does not include a jurisdictional stream or wetland.
Pond Outflow Channel Crossing
This crossing (Photo 2) is a stream that receives pond overflow from a drop structure through the
dam groundwater and seepage. This stream has a fairly small drainage area (less than 0.1 square
mile) and primarily drains forest areas and smaller amounts of residential yards. An evaluation using
NCDWR guidance resulted in the determination that this feature is a perennial channel that is subject
to Section 404 jurisdiction (see blue lines on Figure 1). The stream bed appears to be incised below
the natural elevation, and receives flow following rainfall events, but not enough to cause overbank
flooding. During the field visit, the channel bed was coated by iron -oxidizing bacteria indicating
groundwater seepage as a primary source of water. In summary, the pond outflow channel crossing
does include a jurisdictional stream but no wetland.
UT to Marks Creek Crossing
This stream has a fairly large drainage area (approximately 2.4 square miles) equally composed of
forest and agricultural/pastoral areas. The stream has been subject to beaver activity for an extended
period and is currently characterized by a series of channel segments, each of which rises below a
dam and drowns into the next impoundment. A perennial stream segment enters the upper end of the
investigated reach and drowns into an impoundment after several hundred feet (see blue line on
Figure 1). This reach typically supports low flows and is characterized by a sand bed lacking riffles
and pools (Photo 3). An evaluation using NCDWR guidance resulted in the determination that this
feature is a perennial channel subject to Section 404 jurisdiction.
The impoundments extend across the floodplain and are characterized by a mix of open water, Non -
tidal Freshwater Marsh, and relatively young Riverine Swamp Forest (Photo 4). An evaluation using
USACE guidance resulted in the determination that the majority of the floodplain is subject to
Section 404 jurisdiction (see pink lines on Figure 1). Riverine Swamp Forest is the predominant
wetland type within the investigated reach of this floodplain.
In summary, the UT to Marks Creek crossing includes both a jurisdictional stream segment and
extensive adjacent jurisdictional wetlands.

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 4
Note: The UT to Marks Creek is included with nearby Marks Creek as part of a designated N.C.
Natural Heritage Program (NCHNP) Significant Natural Heritage Area element occurrence. This
area is an example of a natural community known as "Piedmont/Mountain Semipermanent
Impoundment." The UT to Marks Creek includes three sub -types of this community: Open Water
Sub -type, Piedmont Marsh Sub -type, and Shrub Sub -type.
Riparian Buffers
Any surface water depicted on either the most recent version of the NRCS county soil survey or the
most recent version of the USGS 7.5 -minute quadrangle is subject to the Neuse River riparian buffer
rules (15A NCAC 02b.0233). All streams identified as jurisdictional are subject to the buffer rules.
The buffer extends 50 feet perpendicular to the banks of these streams. Since the referenced map
products depict a stream flowing within the entire UT to Marks Creek crossing investigated reach, a
50 -foot riparian buffer is in effect for this feature until an on-site determination by a representative of
the NCDWR confirms the feature is not present on the ground.
Federally Threatened and Protected Species
Based on the most recently updated county -by -county database of federally listed species in North
Carolina as posted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (accessed October 7, 2014), the
bald eagle and three federally protected species are listed for Wake County. Table 1 lists these
species and indicates if potential habitat exists within the investigation area (a 50 -foot corridor
centered on the proposed hiking trail) for each.
Table 1. Federally protected species listed for Wake County, NC.
*Federal Status: BGPA=Protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, E=Endangered
Habitat
Common
Scientific
*Federal
within study
Name
Name
Status
Habitat
area
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus
BGPA
Mature forest with large, dominant trees or snags,
Yes
leucocephalus
typically within 1.0 mile of open water
Red -cockaded
Roosting habitat consists of 60 years old and older
woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
living pine; foraging habitat consists of pine and
Yes
pine -hardwood stands 30 years old or older
Dwarf
Alasmidonta
E
Small to large rivers on a variety of habitat types in
wed emussel
heterodon
h ydrologically stable streams
No
Michaux's
Rhus michauxii
E
Sandy or rocky open woods in association with
Yes
sumac
basic soils
*Federal Status: BGPA=Protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, E=Endangered

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 5
Bald Eagle
Personal communication with an adjacent landowner confirmed that a bald eagle has recently been
observed in the vicinity of the investigation area. Lake Myra is a large, open water providing eagle
feeding and roosting habitat that is located approximately 0.5 mile northwest of the investigation
area. The investigation area does support scattered large trees that could be used for eagle roosting.
The proposed project May Affect, but is Not Likely to Adversely Affect bald eagle.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
The N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) has documented red -cockaded woodpeckers within a
mile northwest of the investigation area in the vicinity of Lake Myra. The investigation area
primarily winds through forests dominated by hardwood trees but with scattered pines. The largest
pines observed in and adjacent to the investigation area are less than 60 years of age, so no
nesting/roosting habitat occurs within the investigation area. One pine stand occurs at the location of
proposed Parking Area A, but these trees are less than 30 years old so do not provide foraging
habitat. Several pine stands occur within 0.5 mile of the investigation area, but all are less than 30
years old. No evidence of red -cockaded woodpeckers was observed during our field investigations.
The proposed project will have No Effect on red -cockaded woodpecker.
Dwarf Wedaemussel
Habitat for dwarf wedgemussel consists of slow, well -oxygenated creeks and rivers with sand,
gravel, or firm silt bottoms. The UT to Marks Creek is the only stream within the investigation area
large enough to potentially support dwarf wedgemussel. This reach of stream has been subjected to
beaver activity for an extended period that has resulted in the replacement of most of the stream with
wetland/open water complexes. The one reach of stream remaining is characterized by sluggish flow
and an unstable sand bed. No mussel shells were observed during our field investigations. Suitable
habitat for dwarf wedgemussel does not occur within the investigation area; therefore, the proposed
project will have No Effect on dwarf wedgemussel.
Michaux's Sumac
The NCNHP has documented Michaux's sumac within the southwestern corner of Tumipseed
Nature Preserve (along the utility line corridor adjacent to Marks Creek). This site is outside of our
investigation area for this project. Suitable habitat occurs within the investigation area along the
margins of agricultural fields and existing roads. No evidence of this species was found during our
field investigations; therefore, the proposed project will have No Effect on Michaux's sumac.
Federally Proposed Species
A USFWS proposal for listing the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as an Endangered
species was published in the Federal Register in October 2013. The listing will become effective on

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 6
or before April 2015. Summer roosting habitat for northern long-eared bat is underneath bark, in
cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees, and winter roosting (hibernation) habitat consists
of caves and mines. Foraging habitat consists of forested hillsides and ridges.
The northern long-eared bat has been recorded in Wake County. The investigation area contains
both suitable summer roosting habitat, in the form of trees with crevices and/or peeling bark, and
foraging habitat. Therefore, the proposed project May Affect, but is Not Likely to Adversely
Affect northern long-eared bat. There appears to be two routes to take with regard to the northern
long-eared bat
1. Remove all trees required by the proposed plan (assumed to be the parking lots and access
roads) prior to the listing date. If there is no suitable habitat within the investigation area, the
biological conclusion for this species can be revised to "No Effect." Until the species is
listed, there are no restrictions on tree cutting. In this scenario, there is no need for
coordination with the USFWS.
2. Initiate an informal conference for the northern long-eared bat with the USFWS with the
intention of obtaining a concurrence letter. The success of this effort would likely depend on
the agreement to certain conservation measures associated with the development of the site.
Key conservation measures include minimizing loss of the remaining trees and avoiding the
removal of trees during the summer maternity season (May to July). The informal conference
application should consist of a cover letter describing the project and offering conservation
measures with the Axiom summary letter and figure attached. It takes approximately 30 days
for the USFWS to issue a concurrence letter for a successful application.
Future Tasks
Axiom is scoped to solicit verification of delineated streams and wetlands from appropriate natural
resource agencies; and we are to attend a site visit to obtain the delineation verification. We propose
this be a two-step process.
1. Axiom will request a NCDWR representative visit the site and make a determination as to
whether the portion of the UT to Marks Creek without a stream channel is subject to the
Neuse River riparian buffer rule.
2. The USACE will need a project area boundary in order to verify our jurisdictional area
delineation. It seems to us the project area boundary might be equivalent to our investigation
area: an approximately 50 -foot wide corridor centered on the proposed hiking trails and
access roads, the three proposed parking areas, and the three potential stream and/or wetland
crossings. Is the planning far enough along for this boundary to have been finalized? If not,
for the purposes of obtaining the delineation verification, we may want to consider

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
October 17, 2014
Page 7
generating a project area boundary map that overestimates the size of the project area so that
we will have USACE verification for the area included in the final plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this information. We appreciate the opportunity
to assist with this project.
Yours truly,
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Alexander P. (Sandy) Smith
Senior Project Manager
Attachment

1
`•' +eat -�, i-. -AO „ J

Photo 3. UT to Marks Creek stream channel
Photo 4. UT to Marks Creek beaver impoundment (wetland and open water)

RALEIGH
IN
GARNER
North Bend Crossingy 74
� �'4+ w ' 0; / • , 1` - -• Ax:,m En.>,nnrtier+tx tnr..
oa
' r „{ fig, - r• �,.*: a;. Prepared for:
Mfr
„ . �IR _,,,.•_
COUNTY
Pond Outfall Channel Crossing
UT to Marks Creek Crossing
_td
Project:
TURNIPSEED
NATURE PARK
Wake County, NC
Title:
LOCATION
AND
INVESTIGATION
AREAS
.�• �"!;1�r1 ;/' # a ,Lg w—pK, ..w.._ Notes:
'� , _ �1 ►ice.Vii.
4j a 1. Background imagery source:
2010 color orthophotography
4k /�,+ provided by the NC OneMap
L ► , Program (online, supported by
the NC Geographic Information
I,, ii►''' Coordination Council).
i ' ,Ira s �. g6 •.� !' �p �' .i►��„ ` 2.2 -foot elevation contours
�;�t(r,.- `\� sa; are generated from 2007 Light
Distance and Ranging (LiDAR)
data
Floodplain rMapp ng Program
�.
r - j � r• �i -• ,"-�� �,;,•.� ti, , '� t � � and provided by the NC
Department of Transportation.
?1
Pp4 fh g
C/
LO
Legend
t '�7 ..• w ; Drawn SGD
�.% ��,.,/• �4 f' r,:. Q Wake County property boundary Date: Oct 2014
JOHNSTON +.AVScale: 1:6600
COUNTY '% ' r �3 / f Investigation areas
�e ��: _✓ , t 1 250
ip
seediR ff �w t :: =�� ='` Approximate delineated wetland location project No.: 14-016
CLAYTON ,�� f = s Approximate delineated stream location
Major (named) FIGURE
1,000 500 0 1,000 NCDOT roads
M
Feet 2 -foot elevation contours 1
of M
►
'C+D,,. I.ii !✓
i:.
CD
WAKE FOREST
C
/ �
a,
F`
.ter _sM � � .,
p�
L�` � • =
.w1
a '
"-
250
.
RALEIGH
IN
GARNER
North Bend Crossingy 74
� �'4+ w ' 0; / • , 1` - -• Ax:,m En.>,nnrtier+tx tnr..
oa
' r „{ fig, - r• �,.*: a;. Prepared for:
Mfr
„ . �IR _,,,.•_
COUNTY
Pond Outfall Channel Crossing
UT to Marks Creek Crossing
_td
Project:
TURNIPSEED
NATURE PARK
Wake County, NC
Title:
LOCATION
AND
INVESTIGATION
AREAS
.�• �"!;1�r1 ;/' # a ,Lg w—pK, ..w.._ Notes:
'� , _ �1 ►ice.Vii.
4j a 1. Background imagery source:
2010 color orthophotography
4k /�,+ provided by the NC OneMap
L ► , Program (online, supported by
the NC Geographic Information
I,, ii►''' Coordination Council).
i ' ,Ira s �. g6 •.� !' �p �' .i►��„ ` 2.2 -foot elevation contours
�;�t(r,.- `\� sa; are generated from 2007 Light
Distance and Ranging (LiDAR)
data
Floodplain rMapp ng Program
�.
r - j � r• �i -• ,"-�� �,;,•.� ti, , '� t � � and provided by the NC
Department of Transportation.
?1
Pp4 fh g
C/
LO
Legend
t '�7 ..• w ; Drawn SGD
�.% ��,.,/• �4 f' r,:. Q Wake County property boundary Date: Oct 2014
JOHNSTON +.AVScale: 1:6600
COUNTY '% ' r �3 / f Investigation areas
�e ��: _✓ , t 1 250
ip
seediR ff �w t :: =�� ='` Approximate delineated wetland location project No.: 14-016
CLAYTON ,�� f = s Approximate delineated stream location
Major (named) FIGURE
1,000 500 0 1,000 NCDOT roads
M
Feet 2 -foot elevation contours 1
00
WAKE FOREST
"kj 246
23."
.,
�.
' •� ����� �
?3r7 _238
�
41
r WAKE
'
th
RALEIGH
IN
GARNER
North Bend Crossingy 74
� �'4+ w ' 0; / • , 1` - -• Ax:,m En.>,nnrtier+tx tnr..
oa
' r „{ fig, - r• �,.*: a;. Prepared for:
Mfr
„ . �IR _,,,.•_
COUNTY
Pond Outfall Channel Crossing
UT to Marks Creek Crossing
_td
Project:
TURNIPSEED
NATURE PARK
Wake County, NC
Title:
LOCATION
AND
INVESTIGATION
AREAS
.�• �"!;1�r1 ;/' # a ,Lg w—pK, ..w.._ Notes:
'� , _ �1 ►ice.Vii.
4j a 1. Background imagery source:
2010 color orthophotography
4k /�,+ provided by the NC OneMap
L ► , Program (online, supported by
the NC Geographic Information
I,, ii►''' Coordination Council).
i ' ,Ira s �. g6 •.� !' �p �' .i►��„ ` 2.2 -foot elevation contours
�;�t(r,.- `\� sa; are generated from 2007 Light
Distance and Ranging (LiDAR)
data
Floodplain rMapp ng Program
�.
r - j � r• �i -• ,"-�� �,;,•.� ti, , '� t � � and provided by the NC
Department of Transportation.
?1
Pp4 fh g
C/
LO
Legend
t '�7 ..• w ; Drawn SGD
�.% ��,.,/• �4 f' r,:. Q Wake County property boundary Date: Oct 2014
JOHNSTON +.AVScale: 1:6600
COUNTY '% ' r �3 / f Investigation areas
�e ��: _✓ , t 1 250
ip
seediR ff �w t :: =�� ='` Approximate delineated wetland location project No.: 14-016
CLAYTON ,�� f = s Approximate delineated stream location
Major (named) FIGURE
1,000 500 0 1,000 NCDOT roads
M
Feet 2 -foot elevation contours 1

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriqins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectiSite:Aa.4t t
Latitude:r r-'<r7r?TL li r
Evaluator: ^. r '.'�w';
County: ( .
Longitude: - ?f,44
Total Points:
twrmination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19 or rennial if 30' [ i
phemerel Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =__LL2_j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
t° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(6-5)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
�1 !
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
Yes = 3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
; '0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1,5
11, Second or greater order channel
No 14 0 .
Yes = 3
� I R ,,t .+ s.>_ `•ems,,,.. r i P i , :
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = i
12. Presence of Baseflow
*0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(6-5)
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 ,
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0,5 ,
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0,1
No , 0
Yes = 3
1,5
C. Biology (Subtotal
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 :
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q`
1
2
3
22 Fish'p
i
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0,1
0.5
1
1,5
24. Amphibians
0 •
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
0.5
1
t5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5
Other= 0 )
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
� I R ,,t .+ s.>_ `•ems,,,.. r i P i , :
Sketch:
- '" �r ;..,. •,"- .- a,
,
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ��
Project/Site: r k N1'?r
i
Latitude n7 ,
Evaluator: ,, ;:
County .y;^
Longitude: •'j,=?j7+
Total Points: i
S rmination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
phemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or rennial it a 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=___
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
/-3)
2_ Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
ro
1
2
3
5. Activeireiict floodplain
U
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
'0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
:` '0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
f`
1.5
10. Natural valley
0„
0.5
1
1,5
11. Second or greater order channel
No :� 0
Sketch:
Yes = 3'
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HVdroloov (Subtotal = ' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
3
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
'
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1,5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Q
0.5
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
/,0)
0.5 11
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
U
No 0I
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
A.
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
U
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
kjal0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other'
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Bate: ,'
,� o;fe rte' r';
Project/Site: -� 1 ,'
Latitude: 7 "•[!
k i i
Evaluator: Y r q:, / fl�sar,.
County: ;'b '" '
Longitude: • I`
0
1
2
Total Points:
Stream Determination{cl
Other
Stream is at least intermittent'
Ephemeral Intermitten erennlal
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or rennial if 30•
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = L�, _'
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
to Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
f' 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
` 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
;
n2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
!1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
:' 2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 a
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8 Headcuts
1
2
3
9, Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
05
1
1.5 ,
11. Second or greater order channel
No =O
Yes = 3
Sketch:
.1 i-
i .
I
r
i
"artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 9 ; )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
+ 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
00.5
1
j
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
031
1
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes ,= 3 )
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7� )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
r
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0
`tJ
11
1.5
25_ Algae
0 :
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,5
Other =`0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
.1 i-
i .
I
r
i
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
rf' , t A c„r r.•
Project/Site: f /
Latitude
Evaluator: r �,
County:
ty:
Longitude: .
g
0
1
i
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
Other
Stream is at least intermittent ^ ^
a 19 or perennial N>30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perenni
e.g. Name:it
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = i"'
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
n le- of sequence
��
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
'2
3
5 Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
ijD
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
(1;
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
,r1:
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5 ,
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch rr}.r t:rf
artiticial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
3
14, Leaf litter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
' 0`- 0,5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 5)
C.
to oqv (Subtotal = I 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20- Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
61.
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
DN
1
2
3
22 Fish
0
0.5
,
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1-7
1.5
25. Algae
'0_11
0.5
1
1.5
26. Weiland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBLr"1 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch rr}.r t:rf
41

USACE AID'-_ _____________ _ DWQ ;v Site (indicate on attached map)
In '
t t
► t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET --10%0
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name: "44h, Ill OJ -4 2. Evaluator's name: �' =
3. Date of evaluation: 1017h ; 4. Time of evaluation: —2-
5.
25. Name of stream: urr . River basin: tl
Cyit,
7. Approximate drainage area: f3, 0 'APA4 t: f It 8. Stream order:`)'
9. Length of reach evaluated: %:) 1.'T 10. County: ks�i.
11. Site coordinates (if known): �,7uM*(, ,. 77-115111 12. Subdivision name (if any): Tait Wkt� A404rr % °►„ ,�
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of
l7. Identify any special waterway classifications knowm: Section 10 v Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters 4utrient Sensitive Wat Water Supply Watershed (1-I V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? E NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES A)NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 41 % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
1,
22. Bankfull width: f 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 41p ,"ntAe�j
24. Channel slope down center of stream, Flat ( to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _ Qac ---ons nom._ Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worl-beet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecore-ion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity. and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Evaluator's Signature =1y . i—l-n Date ~
This channel evaluatia orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and #nvironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCORE
/ I
t
1
51
I !
HARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of major bank failures
ce of flow /persistent pools in streamr
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
0-5
0 ' S
0-5),
saturation = 0; strong flow =max aims)
0-0-4
Root depth and density on banks i
0-5
idence of past human alteration0_6
E(extxensiveedischarges
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points
0 '
0-4
0 - S
alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints)
15
0-5
0 -5
Riparian zone
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
0: conn uous, wide buffer = max oints
0-6
0-4
0-5
ce of nutrient or chemical discharges
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = maxpoints)
0 -3
0- 5
0-6
ischar es _ 0; no discharges =maxpoints)
0 - 5
0--4
0 4
..a
5
Groundwater discharge
little or no habitat = 0: fre uent, varied habitats = max points)
p_ 6
U0-3
0- 6
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
8
0-4
0-4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0 - 5
0 5 i
0-- 5
no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain = max oints
0-4
0--4
0 - 2
x
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(dee Iv embedded = 0: loose structure = max
NA*
a"
0-4
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = Maxpoints)
0 - 5
0-4
0-2
8
j Presence of adjacent wetlands
no evidence = 0: common. numerous t� es = maxpoints)
0 .- 4 f
0-5
0 --5
(no wetlands ands = 0; laradjacent wetlands =max aims
0-6
0 - 4
0 -
4
Channel sinuosity
-0-4
0 -- 4
i
0-4
extensive channelization = 0. natural meander = max aints)
0-5
0 - 3
10
Sediment input
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es =max oints)0-4
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
0 - 5
0-4
0-4 I
1 1fine,
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
no evidence - 0, abundant evidence =max oints
0- 6
0-5
0-5
Total Points Possible
homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
NA*
0- 4
0-5
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. -_-
SCORE
/ I
t
1
51
I !
-..__..__ - ---- ...,... - - - W;11 Egg
(deeply incised = 0: stable bed &: banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0 - 5
,...
1
Presence of major bank failures
J
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
0-5
0 ' S
0-5),
JA
14
Root depth and density on banks i
Ey
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points
0 '
0-4
0 - S
✓�
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
!b
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
E�
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = maxpoints)
0 -3
0- 5
0-6
17
Habitat complexity
,.,
little or no habitat = 0: fre uent, varied habitats = max points)
p_ 6
0- 6
0- 6
8
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0 - 5
0 5 i
0-- 5
19
Substrate embeddedness
(dee Iv embedded = 0: loose structure = max
NA*
0-4
0-4
�0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
no evidence = 0: common. numerous t� es = maxpoints)
0 .- 4 f
0-5
0 --5
C.7
1
Presence of amphibians
no evidence = 0; common, numerous ri es = max oints)
0 -- 4
0-4
0-4
Presence of fish
JO:
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es =max oints)0-4
0-4
0-4
Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence - 0, abundant evidence =max oints
0- 6
0-5
0-5
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. -_-
SCORE
/ I
t
1
51

USACL AID:'
D W Q
Site ":
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the streamreach under assessment'
k
1. Applicant's name. 2. Uvaluaior's nalllc:
3. Date ofe%,21tiati0l' 19114 > OPI
4. l'inic ofevaluatioll
10, LVIt4 1 6. River basin-
Appro\iinatc drainage area: S. Stream order
9. Length of reach evaluated 14). Count%, �. _i
11. Site coordinates (if known) prefer tit dvollial Jvert:t!, 12. suixilvi-ioll
On,;
r
\IcIllisit ii)cjtion docrmined (circler t pS I opo Sheet t)rho (A%:ri;tIlI"hiq0`('1IS 01herGili OIIiff
13, Location of reach under evaluation (-note nearb\ roads and landmarks and attach map identifying sire i s) local lot]
14. Proposed channel work Of any)
15. Recent weather conditions
16. Site conditions at tittle of visit: -
17. identify any special waterwa\ classifications known 10 Tidal Water% Essential Fisheries. I
'I rout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Y Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Suppl% Waterilied —il-i\
IS. Is there a pond or take located upstream (if the evaluation point? \10 If yeti. estimate the water surface arca
19. I)ocs channel appear on USES quad map" NO 20. Does channel appear oil USDA Soil Survey? /NTS
2 1. Estimated watershed land use: Residential —iio Commercial Industrial t
IL _",ii Cleared � Logged Other
22. Banklull width. 21 Bank height (frum bed 14) (op of hank I
24. ('hannel slope down center of stream: _/._ Flat (0t02"t0 Moderate 0 lit I0"/,i slecpt
25. Channel sintiositit: Ir Strai-Ill Occasional bunds X I-requem meander _Very sinuous ,Braided chamicl
. — —
Instructions for completion of workshert (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecorevion based (tit
location. terrain. vegetation. strea classification, etc Fvcry characteristic most he scored using the same ecoregion. .-Vo,!gn polm,
t
to each characteristic within the ranee mio%%n rui the ecoregion. Paec 3 provide- i brief description of hi.- lo revw'-% I !lt:
characteristics identified in the vorkshect. Scores should reflect an uvernll assessment of the streamreach under ;:v,flutiliwi It .1
01-.11-acteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or mieathet conditions. enter n it, the scorin.-, bw, and provide all ciplaii.ilion ;tl 111C
colliniclit, section. Where there are %)b\ ious changes in the character of i stream under revie" (c.g . the stream f1cm -, 1row a 11,tNtilit,
into a forest)• the stream inn v be divided into smaller reaches that display inore continuity. and -11 serlavale 10rill used it, z:N:1111-11c -'J'
reach. The total score assigned to a strearn reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 10(i rcprewnting a stre.iiii ol lilt,
highest quality
T'opl Score (from reverse): Comments: Ar o.
Date als tit
Slgn8lurcYhi'sT_in�tAnded to be used onlil as a guide to assts( lando" r 11Z ironmental profemsion.
Evaluator's Signature 1- -_ ill,--- — -11 � 1--1 - I --- , -1-1 1-1 .
I I
This channel evaluation
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to VSACF apprinal and does not imply
-1 () please call Q19-876-84-41 \ 2h
particular mitigation ratio or requirement- Forin subject to change - versant 06!0',

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
U*
V
CHARAC'TERIST'ICS I__
LCOR_l�:CtOM POINT
___. .__, ��.-
!t_ANGE
_-- --_
SCORI?
7.
(no e%idence - 0. commion. numerous types max points)
Coastal Piedmont
()
Mountain
Uw tdnee U, cwnnum. numerou, 1% PCs niax points)
Presence of flow persistent pools in stream
i i 100
„ Presence of fish
(nog eetdenee V rnnnon. numerous apes - max points)
U - a
0-4
(no floe or,,aturation 0 strong flow max points) s
0 ;
O t
(no evidence u, abundant evidence nas, points)
p i
�
0
_.. _ _�_.. _ ._.._
videnceofpast human alteration
-
, -__ __,
_.____—._.__!._
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
I,fiesc characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
(exiensic a alteration 0; no alterdtion - tnax points) I
t)
O
i
u
Riparian zone
Ino buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer ntax poims) 1
0 _ b
0-4
0- 5Lit
t
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges j
(coensivc discharges 0: no discharges - max points)
—
0 c
0, t
0- a
Groundwater discharge
(noi discharge 0: springs. steps. wetlands, etc. -- max points)
o _ ;
(l
0
Presence of adjacent floodplain
r
(no) floodplain - 0; extensive floodplain - max points) X
0. 4
0_ a
f
U_
-
Entrenchment l floodplain access
j
(deeply entrenched - 0; frcqueni flooding max points)(
U - ;
$ 0 - 4
p 2
1
I Presence of adjacent wetlands
} (oil wetlands 0: large. adjacent wetlands max points)
U 6�
0
U -' !
�i
Channel sinuosity
(extensive c'hannelixation 0. natural nncandcr max points)
j
0-
------_—_inputt _._.__
Sediment input
T..
_______
r_-..__
_^.
.�—
I t!
f extensive deposun
ion 0, little or no sediment � iax paints
, !
t) l
t) _ a)
I
0 - J �
2 -
Size & diverctti of channel bed substrate
sura
i I
(_tine hoino(�enous 0 large. diversc ,(Les max points)
NAI
o-.4
0 - i
!
1
Evidence of channel incision orwidening
0
I
O a
(derpl% incised - 0: stable bed & banks - max points)
- ,
0 -
I,
Presence of major bank failures
�
() -
0
--
(srvcre erosion - 0: no erosion, stable banks - nnax paints)
j
( -` ;
I
� ,
1
Root depth and density on banks
!
,
(no t isibic roots • 0: den%c roots throughout -max points)
1
Impact by agriculture. livestock. or timber produedon
(substantial impact -0: no evidence =max points) '
t)l
' (► - a
0- 5
Presence
lh
of riffle-poolfripplc-pool complexes
O
(tit) i i ffles-ripples or pools (t: well-developed ` inax points)
-.i
0_:i
i
0-6
I
Habitat complexity
17
(little or no habitat 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
O- 6
()-6
0 6 1
l
Canopy coverage over streambed1K
_
r
(no shading ,,egetation 0; continuous cartop� max points)
0-5
I 0-'
i
O S
I to
Substrate embeddedncss —y
>tiA`
() -4 i
0 - a
t�
(due Is embedded U. loose structure -max I
i
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 1)
0-4
7.
(no e%idence - 0. commion. numerous types max points)
0-4
()
Presence of amphibians
Uw tdnee U, cwnnum. numerou, 1% PCs niax points)
i i 100
„ Presence of fish
(nog eetdenee V rnnnon. numerous apes - max points)
U - a
0-4
F,vidence of wildlife use
(no evidence u, abundant evidence nas, points)
0
_.. _ _�_.. _ ._.._
Total Points Possible
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
I,fiesc characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
i
0-4
7.
i i 100
t

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
F'ro)ecUSite IVYA' < Q % y fs IL CttylCounty: rVi"\Kr— Sampling Date :p % i `r
Applicant/Owner State NL Sampling Point-
investigator(5) } 1 4l,8364pn r Section, Township. Range
Landform (hillsktpe. terrace, eIc.):Local relef (concave, convex, riorte) !ir°;p'.G Slope
Subregion (LRR of MLRA): t %C' �' Lal- ` > 1 '.r l�f)L? % tong " i°r+' , �" 112 3 5 Datum
Soni Map Unit Name NWI cfa%%nficatton. NA
vV
a
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditiMs n the Site typical for this time of year{ Yes No (If no, explain in Remark% )
Are Vegetation Soil f or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Arc "Normal Circumstances' (resent? Yes '/No
Are V(!gelalron . Soni N or Hydrology naturally problemittc? (It ive-eded explain any answers in Remark% )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present) Yes No Yr Is the Sampled Area
hydric Soil Present' Yes No +X within a Wetland? Yes No '
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secorwlary indicators (minimum, of two re guired)
Primary indicators (minimum of one is reouired:
check
alf that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Spatsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Q8
_ High Wale Table: (AZ)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Draina
_ Saturation (A3)
_
Oxidized Rhizosplieres can Living
Roots(, oss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (61)
_
Presence of Reduced Iron (
_ Dry -Season Water laNe (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_
Recent Iron Red n Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drill Deposits (83)
_
Tltrn ur(ace (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
ter (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1)
Iron Deposw (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aen , gery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Wme f-Stai S (89)
_ Microtopographic Rulk:t (D4)
atic fauna (8 13)
_ FAC -Neutral )eel (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
X
Depth (inches) '
?
Saturation Piesi+nt? Yes No
r*`
Depth (inches): ; ;
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
trxludes capillary fin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, inandorrrig well, aerial photos, previous inspections). it available
Rtmarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Lastem Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

,
VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute ooninatitmdicm
Cover Specl(,—,
Status
r
/
It_—__—_��
Sampling
Number mcoinpao
That Are uyL. F"CvvmFAC �m`
Total Number monminmx
Species »om.All Strata lm)
--------------�Percent aDorrvnaoSpecies
�
----------------'|That Are ooL/AcW, or/Ac
G
Total Cover
50%. of loteil cover. 20% of total cover
FAL
3
� `Twmcovw
smu oft tal __�20mmm«alxu°m-��__
y
� '
^
o
6
- Total Cover
51. 050% qj total cover, 20%mtotal cover:
____
Herb Stratum (Plot size -
2
z Ual ftyo 0m, Am Ll ,J
^ ,
,
6
7
o
y—~~~~�,�,~~~~~�~
1
Tm^/Cover
sn�vrtotal cever_eu%o/total xovm._/'/__
�
s
^|mgCover
50%, of total cover 1 20% of total cover:
r% here or on a , epat ate Sheet I
�3
��--'mm)
Total % Cover of
_Multiply by:
ooL,pecie»
,I~________
pxcwspecies
x»^________
FAC species
xa-________
F*cuqmuc*
x*~________
upl.,wo:^
x
Prevalence Index -B/A~
1 Rapid Test for *yump^ytfcVegetation
z - Dominance Test a~m0m
3'Prevalence Index mm1n'
*'Morphological Adaptations' (irovide supponing
data mnei,/ak^wnn^separate a=el)
Promommu/^yumpmytmvegetation' (c*pmw)
` Indicators * hydric vmand w^nonuhydrology mvv
be present. unless disturbed mproblematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 h (6 m) of mote in height and 3 in.
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at bicast height IDSH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20n(6 m)mmote mheight and less
Shrub plants.
|
approximately y/ozoo(1mao)mheight
Herb sxprbac*ous (non -woody) plants, inrlud4rig
herbaceous vines. regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vine%. less than approximaiNy 3
Woody vine All woody vine%. regardless mheight
Hydrophytic
Vegotation
YesNo �
o5Army 0mp`m6ogmu"` co`v,nMountains and Piedmont wrsgir`2o

1 4
SOIL Sampling Point VY#Avd
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Imctx-s) Color (moist), k Calor (matso % Tvne Loc. Texture Remark%
i'
type. G=.c;oncerrtratnon. U-t)e tion, RM -Reduced Matrix, MS=MiiskedSand Ginins. 'Location. PL -Pore Lining, M=Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
— Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147
_ Hishc Epipedon (A2)
_ Potyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coayi Pj�yyte8wciciw{Ar}H
_ Black HiMic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gteyed Matrix (12)
_ Piedmont 1-10rx)plain Soils (F 19)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (f3
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Retlox Da ace (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 121
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Dark Surface(F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Ihick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (
Iron -Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gle atrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'trrdicatois of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sa edox (S5)
_„ Piedmont ffoodp lain Sats (F 19) (MLRA 148)
vmtiand hydrology must be. present,
_ Stripped Matrix (SG)
Red Parent Material (f21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disiurbod or problematic
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _
US Army Corps of Engineers Easuin Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projecttsite Crty/County tt�jCt}�" 5ernplmgDate !D)'f r+
ApplicanuOwner.
State ,_Sampling Point
Inve-.hgator(;) Sr11 i Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilfslope• levraee. etc ): .' , t+7a :fA Local telef (concave, convex, none), jvr1E1RYL- Slope (`X,) 4 Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• t ai Lar 3 '7J SLL) Long -� til�l'�° Datum-
!%-
atum
Sod Map Urn1 Nerve: iDK { "�+� PoA r NWI classification pw L
Are clin otic / hydrologic Condltio n the site typical for this time of year? 1'es NO (If no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation�N%. Soil _ N , or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances` pre%enC? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation /y . Soil A or Hydrology I7 naturally problem:itrc '? (If needed explain any an%wer%,n Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
14ydrophytrc Vegetation Present? Yes VjNo Is the Sampled Area
liydnc Soil Present? Yes V7 No within a Wetland? Yes V/ No
Wetland Hydrology present? Yes 7— No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum tN Iwn rc�ttuiri df
Primary Indicatm (minimum of one is reautred check
all that aonlvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (A1) _
True Aquatic Plants tB14)
_ SWirsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table: (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Dramage Paltuns (610)
Saturation (AM _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (81) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)_
Dry Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrow, (C8)
Drill Deposits (B3) _
Thin Muck StBfaci; (C7)
_
— Saturatron Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
_� Algal Mat or Crusi (BA) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)_
Stunted or Stressed Planus (D1)
_ Iron Dopos+ts (85)
Geonnorphic Positron (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ water -Stained leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ AgUaI+G Fauna (B13)
� FAC-Neulra3l lett (D5)
Meld Observations:
Surface Water Presents Yes No ap
Depth pncttes)
Water Table Present? Yes �Y No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ', _ No
Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
endude% capillary frin t
No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photo%, previous inspections), if avaifabk!:
Remarks
US Army Caps of Engineers
Eastern Motmta+ns and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size I
1
2
3
4
G
Sampling Point )i �
Absolute Doninant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Cover ele •? StaluS Number of Donunani Spencies
That Aw OBL. FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Nuinber of Dominant ' }
Species Across All Strata r (8)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC S tA/B)
Total Cover
501tro of total cover 20% of total cover
Sapli m Straton) (Plot size )
1 U)Muit
z _
3
4
5
G
V = Total Covera
501K, of total cover �� 2096 of total cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot we I
2 �.
a
a Total Cover
20% of total cover
50`ib of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size. )
2 ) 1,0 1 i' 10 JA
3 P �A P L
4��+sa
rt Ursa +C� _L IV t IIL
5.
6.
7
8,
9.
10
11
1U = Total Cove f
500.". of total ccnrr 9 20?t, of total tovrx
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
f
S.
Total %, Cover of:
MulGofv by
OBL species
x I
F ACW species,
x 2
FAC species
x 3
F ACU species
x4
UPL species
x5,
Culurnu Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - BIA
_ T • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 Dominance Tesl rs -50%.
_ 3 • Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remark,. or on a separate street)
_ Prot*nnatic Hydiophytic Vegetation' (t' xptain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Womy plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (,G m) or more: in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (UBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vires.
approximately 20 It 16 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to G m) to height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines. tegardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, k -ss than approximately 3
It (1 m) in twigttt.
Woody vine - All woody canes. regardless of height
Hydrophytic
. Total Cover Vegetation V/
50>, of total cover 203., of total cover Present? Yes j No
is herr. or on a separate sheet )
US Army Corps of [nginrers L astern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Region
t�/ I
f'ro)eCUSae 'Mli" "f,�,d WAi.�.t• _ A . freC GnyrCoemty ?oak& Sampling Date © %
Applicant/Owner
,-- State Sampling Point
Investigator(;)/k?''i/r�. Section, Township. Range
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc) tW � ev�IL T, /i Local relief (concave, corwex, i,orte) Slope ( )
�Q
Subregion (L. RR of MLRAt)I `-�_ Lat ,• • fr t L.nng Datum
Soil Map Unit Name ook+>f ►+a�fybr� `)P yrs 4rOYf'' NWI classification
Are climatic f hydrologic conditiori�on the sate typical for this time of year? Yes No (If ito explaet in Remarks.)
Are.. Vegetation • Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally prottlemalic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samplinq point locations. transects. imnnrtant fpati irac atr
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area ,✓
Ilydric Soil Present, Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No >'
n ■ uRVt...Vti T
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Sernndary Indicators Iminmum of two 10ouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check an fhai aLVIV)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants 1814)
_ Spar , ed Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Witter Table (AZ)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1►
_ ainage Patterns {81Q)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rtuzospheres on Livi
s (C3) __.. Moss Trim lines (B/G)
_ Water Mktrks (B1►
_Presence of Reduce((! 1)
_ Dry -Season Water Tab)e IC2)
_ Sediment Deposes (B2)
_Recent Iron ion in 7)ged Soik (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift DtTtosNs (83)
_ Th Surface fC7►
_ Saftuation V)srUlc on Aerial imagery (G9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (Bol)
� �
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Planus (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ ��"
_Geomorphic Position {D2)
_ Inundation Visible fxi.L�e►rdT Imagery (87)
Water- Stputedteaves (89)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_, Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ 1AC•Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Presort? Yes No
°`� Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes No
' Depth (inches)
Saturation Present?
? Yes No
includes capillary ten
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections). of available
Remarks
US Army Corps M Engineers
Eastern Mountains and piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size
2
-i -1,1 rjl 4
Absolute Dorunant indicator
% Cover Species Status
3
x I -
P ACW species
4
I AC species
x 3 -_
FACU species
x 4 -
6.
101,11 Covet
SO,44 of tot il cover 20% of total covet
54phila Stratum (Plot ',Iz(
tljv - Tu4alCovej
smi, of total covet.
20; of lotalcover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
3
4
2D - Total Cover
WX, al,lotal cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size
rAW
3
4
7
8
8.
10.
11
Total Cover
50%,� of total cover 20% or total cover:
W000yVine 5valum (Plot %1ze1
................
AAf
i
4
Sampling Point: ti
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC I (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across AD Strata: (B)
percent of Dominant Species
That Are 08L F AM or FAC ?51) (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total W. Cover of,
Multiply by
OBL species
x I -
P ACW species
2 -
I AC species
x 3 -_
FACU species
x 4 -
LJPL 'irwoes x 5
tAM111111 TOMIS (A)
Prevalencx- Index . B/A -
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >504z
3 - Prevak-nce Index is s3-0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supponing
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
I Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately 2011 (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7.6 cm) or large( in diameter at breast height (OBH)
Sapling - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more at height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 10 6 m) in height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (nonwoody)plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 M) In Iteigrit,
Woody vine - All woody vine%, regardless of height
I olal Covert Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5M of total covt!( Present? Yes V/ No
,' ?0"Y, of total cover.
numbers here or on a separate qx--ej.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains anti Piedmont - Version 2 0

I A
SOIL
Samnlinn Pnint, )aria?i-r-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Featurt-s
(inches) Calor tmrnV) `>"
Calor (mt>rstl `K Tic oc•
Texture tT, ur_ Remarks
-1-ype. C -Concentration. D=Deoehon. RWReduced Matrix. MS --Masked Sand Grains
'Location: PL Pore Lining. M -Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic kJaMc Soils':
_ Histo sol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck LRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (MLRA 147,
148) raxie Redox (A 16)
_ Black Hishc (0
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,140)
)
_ Hydrpgen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Cifeyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (f 3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark a (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Dark Surface (F 7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ f hick lark Surface U12)
_ Redox Depressions IF 6)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (L
Iron -Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sanity Gle trix (S4)
_ Umbric Suriace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicator%of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy edox (S5)
Piedmont flpodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Stripped Matrix (SG)
` Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbr+d or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed);
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains gond Piedmont - Version 2 o

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
DepthMatrix
finches) Color (moist,) , t.
Redox Features
CCoolorrI�lmoi�l) pie, TyjT ���
Texigie Remar-Its
_
Type,�C-,Concentrration. D-Depletion, RMSReduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location. PL= Pore Lining. WMatrix
Hydric Soil Indicators'
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
His_ HisM Epipol ec
Epipedon (A2)
_park Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black
_ Black NlsttC. tA3)
_ thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (12)_
j, Depleted Matrix (F 3)
Piedmont Flo dplain Suds (F 19)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redux Dark Surface (FS)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F 7)
Ottix (E.xpiain in Remarks)
Ituck (lark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (f E)
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N.
Iron-Manganese Masscs (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 122)
11rrdicatois of hydrophytic vegetation arrd
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sass (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless, disturbed or proof ematic
Type
Depth (niches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1j No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
E,351011 Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
<) A 1 7i s
Pro)r cvsite it'/Y' rr w/ r Cryun Wkv c- Sampling Date: i'� %" �
Applicant/Owner state �✓�_ Sampling Point �!
lnvestrgator(;). at PO /AX Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillskope, terrace, etc; 1:
Local relief (concave. convex. none): Slope
'
SutyrT_.gron (LRP or MLRA)• l R++' Lat: 3a �`>`S2Z� Long 1 Dalum
Sod Map Unit Name: LVIA.I'Jwl-. gfAre-1 r .r NWI dassnfication
Are. climatic / hydrologic conditions a the site ical for this time of year? Yes No (I( no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation A. Sod /11'11 . or Hydrology �`+� significantly drslurbieV Are 'Normal Circumstances" (resent'? Yrs No
Are Vegetation , Sod �, or Hydrology naturaAy problematic? (If needed, explain any ansvxrs in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation present? Yes No__j_ is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sort Present- Yes No __/ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No"'`_
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary ltdicalors (minimum of two (e?ouired)
Primary Indicators (mirxmum of one is reouired:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True. Aquatic Plants IB14)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
High Water I able (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patlrrns (B10)
Saturation (a3)
_ Oxidized Rtkrnsp(x°r�on�Rloots (C3jNk�ssTrinaLuwh•i8'�TWater
a
Marks (Bl)
Presence of Reduce-ry•Sr:rfSonW
lociTattle(Gl)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Recent lion R 6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
— Drift Deposits (fi3) �_--#t(r( !s Surface: (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
T Algal Mat or Crust (84) --
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
i Iron Deposits (85)�- _r
_ Geomorphic Positron (D2)
Inurxhayrx ,V(sible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Shallow Aqudard (D3)
Yllater-Stairn d Leaves (89)
— Microtopographic Retie( (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
f'AC-Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
y Depth (ruches). j
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Saturatirxn Present? Yes No
. Depth (inches). f !
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes caMlary fringe)
Desctibe Recorded Data (dream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos_ prt•vious inspections). of available,
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

I
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
G
Tr e r a m (Pint size i 1 K over
Sorars? Status
Number of Dominant Species
P
Lit? - total cover
Prevalence index worksheet:
A/y
That Are ogt FACW. or FAC
(A)
a 1p►yty"OfR f ✓t) leh
-',`' Y._ FAQ
3 —
-�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across AN Strata
)
/ Z
4
47
FACU species x 4V =
(B)
5
Percent of Dominant Species G
G
that Are OBI. F ACW, or FAC IAiB)
Lit? - total cover
Prevalence index worksheet:
501t9i6 oft ctrver. � 20% tit total cover
2'
)Olaf `Y., Cover of: Muhrnly by.
0f3L species
Sanlrrm , ralurn (Plot sine )5' /! , )
a 1p►yty"OfR f ✓t) leh
-',`' Y._ FAQ
FACW spates x 2
2. } ,U tA4
y, ,`'
FAC species x3=
3
47
FACU species x 4V =
d
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Tolals: (A) (g)
6_
Prevalence Index - B/A =.
S� = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
59;9, of total cover
2014, of total cover D
_ 1 - Rapid 1 r, ;t for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Staub Sit iatym (Plot SIP, _�t J) Y to f )
_ 2 Dominance Test is s50%
-FA G
_ 3 - Prevalenr.P Index is s3.0'
2 Lt a(
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supponing
3 le
3. w
data in Remarks or on a separate stwet)
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explan)
5
6
`Iruticatrrs of hydric soil and weltand hydrology must
r�f,
Total Cover
be present. unless disturbed or problerT><atic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=
5D% of total cover
20 x. of total cover �L
Herb T7 )m {Plot size
Tree - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
I A4)C�t�i+tC t ! ,- 6)4 J1?'yY'L+'1
_ AfJ4
approximately 2011 (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7.6 cm) or larger to diameter at creast height MH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
3.
approximately 20 h (6 int) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in, (7.6 cm) DBH.
5
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
6
approximately 3 to 20 If ('I to 6 m) In height
Herb - AN herbaceous (non -woody) plants. including
7
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines k!ss than approximately 3
It 0 m) to heK)IN
0
10
i t
Woody vine AN woody vines, regardless of height
_ = Total Covet
5091, of total c cr o� 2091; of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum IPIot size X !tl 1)
t 14 ! if,
G
)v
4
5.
( include
420 . Taal Cover
50`k of total cover. 20°x) of total cover
IS here or on a separate sheet-)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation x
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features
(inches) Chlor (moi:$)¢ XI Color (moist) x P Lou Texture Remarks
D`to jpy2i ° 7 DArr'f 41
? /i
;'J D
_'Type: C=Concentration. D. Depletion. RM--- Reduced Matrix_MS�=Masked Sand Grams. `Lacatian: PL Pore Linins. M -Matrix. n
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ H4510sol (Al)
._._ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hisbc (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Maltix.($4)
_ Sand ()
upped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type;
Depth (inches)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 1
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 1
_ Loamy GteyeU Mama (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (f3)
_ Redox Dark S e (F6)
_ Dep( ark Surface (F 7)
x Depressions (F6)
_ Iron•Manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F 19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for
P.rob ydric S(
C_ 2 cK (A10) (MLRA 147)
oast Prairie Redox (A 16)
(MLRA 147,148)
)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow hark Surface (TF 12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or txoblemmic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No./
US Army Corps of Engineers E.istern Mountains arirl Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjectiSne Nri'll'Nt&1'rdt -,yt Phe vwc, Cily(County. Samphnq Date Jit 7
Applx:anVOwner: VAit. IAV6!� state. /qtr Sampling Point-
tnvesttgator(,) ^I", s4 �, A r"'.r�'' � Sc�cuxr. Tnwn;ttlp. Range
Landform (hnlslope. terrace. etc.). �-f'1 1- ) /" '''t! Local rebel (concave, convex. rune) 'fit = rv, i 51ope
Subregion (L RR at ML RA)- r Lal- Y' I, Ong. " � ° fir` ' Datum
Son Map Unit Name: ,,'!n+� 1^ r r� i f o • ' w' ' NWI classihcaUon r
Are climatic I hydrologic coMdit on thelsite, typical for this time a year? Yes No (it no, explain in Remarks) ll
Are Vegetation . Sal 1f or Hydrology signihcantby disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ` No
Are Vegetation .Soil _ , or Hydrology f _ naturally problematic? (it needed. explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area r.
Hydric Son Present? Yes yr No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Weiland Hydrology Present? yes-7—
No
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indu:aicirs tmmimum of twn reouiredl
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that aoDly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants IB 14)
_ S(i.'trsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water i ruble (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
5atuiation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rh+zospheres on Living Roots (C3)
! Moss trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (Bt)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry,Season Water T atge (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Crayfish Burrows (Ca)
_, Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sturted or Stressed Plants (DI)
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Goomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ MlCfotopogfaphic ReWl (D4)
— Aquatic f«'Tuna (B13)
_ f AC-Netnral Iest (U5)
Field Observations:
Surtai a Water Present? Yes No
'/ Deixh (ma=nias). l r
Water Table Present? Yes k No
Depth (inches)
r
Saturation Present? Yes h� No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes Capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial pholos previous inspections), if available
Remarks.
US Army Corp%of Engineers Lastern hinuntains and Piedmont - Version !• 0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plats.
Absolute Doninant Indicaux
Tree Stratum (Plot sizr �: *� ry�L) 9( Cover Smpp? Status
4,
5
6
Total Cover
50`N, of total cover v` 20N, of total cover
Sapling stratum (Pint site
1 fc
3
4
5.
Sampling Point:
Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, rACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (ti)
Percent of Dominant Species R:
That Are 061. FACW, or FAG (Aria)
total ,$ Cover of
MuihtNV by
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 -
FACE) species
x4
UPI %pecies
x 5
Cotutim Tutais
(A) (B)
b.. Prevalence Index , BIA
= Total Covet Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
f
�R% of total cover 20", of total cover ` _ 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: r+ ,,nit' Fr ) _ 2 • Dominance Test is X50%,
3 • Prevalenre Index is 53.0'
2 _ d - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide tAipponmg
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4 —
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
indicators of hydric: soil .and wetland hydrology must
6 be present. unless disturbed or txnblematnc
F Total Cover
50`f, of total cover 20%, of total cover
1
Herb 511alum (Plot We
2
3
4
5
6.
7
H
9
10
11
; ` = Total Cover
501/`. of total cover y 201"C (9 total cover. Y
r�
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot we r
2.
3
4
Total Cover
50"";, of total rover 20%, of total cover "
s (Include photo number,, Mere or on a separate Sheet.)
strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vu",.
approximately 20 R (6 111) or more in height and 3 in
(7.6 cot) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and les.
than 3 in (7.6 cin) DBM
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb - AN herbaceous (non -woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except wcxady vines, leis than approximati4y 3
It (1 m) to height
Woody vine - All woody vin's, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Enginrer% Lastern Mountains and Piedmoru - Version 2 0

1, t
SOIL
Sampling Point: Ld"YOP i
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Det)l1i
Matrix
Redox features
finchfinchesl
Color (moist) K.
Calor hnoist) tX;Y w Loco4�
Texture Remark%
Ile
e }
'Type. C-Concenttotion. D -Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Itrctosd (Al)
_ Histrc Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hisdc (A3)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Suit ace (A I i I
Track Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gteyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches)
narks.
Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ F'olyvalue Below Surface: (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (f 2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F$)
_ Depleted Dark Surface IF 7)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses IF 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
,_,_, Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
runt: Pl,-Pore Lining, M-, Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont F Ioodplain Sods (f 19)
(MLRA 136,147)
_._. Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
weitand hydrology recast be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corp, of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Pretlmont - Version 2 0

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-270-9306
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
September 22, 2015
Mr. Eric Staehle, RLA
Wake County
Facilities Design & Construction
P.O Box 550
Raleigh, NC 27602
Re: Turnipseed Nature Preserve 15-025
Summary Letter
Wake County, NC
Dear Eric:
This letter is intended to provide a summary of the results of an Axiom Environmental, Inc. (Axiom)
investigation at the above-mentioned site (Figure 1) on Monday, September 21, 2015. We had as our
goals the following two tasks:
• Extend our previous Gin Creek wetland and stream delineation for a distance of
approximately 100 feet to the northwest.
• Make a stream determination at the proposed crossing location.
The attached figure, titled Erosion Control Central Area, depicts the locations of these two tasks.
Following is a brief summary of our findings.
Gin Creek Delineation Extension
The delineation flags of the wetlands and stream boundaries that we hung October 7-8, 2014 were
found. These flags were still in place and legible. The flags delineated three lines, the western
wetland boundary (the WA line), the left bank of Gin Creek (the SB line), and the eastern wetland
boundary (the WB line). All three lines were extended northwestward for over 100 feet to a
generally east -west oriented line identified by bright green flagging and diamond-shaped signs
indicating a Wake County property boundary. The extensions ofthe wetland lines are marked on site
with the use of enumerated pink -and -black striped flagging, and the extension of the stream line is
marked on site with the use of enumerated solid orange flagging. The attached Figure 1 generally
depicts these line extensions and provides the extension flag numbers (Gin Creek is approximately 5
feet wide). Photo 1 shows the upper end of the delineation extension.
Stream Determination
Axiom visited the site of the requested stream verification at the proposed crossing location (Photo
2). The site includes a natural topographic crenulation. Evaluation of this drainage feature using the

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Mr. Eric Staehle
September 22, 2015
Page 2
N.C. Division of Water Quality — Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and their Origins, v4. I I resulted in a determination that the stream is ephemeral, a non -
jurisdictional stormwater conveyance. The completed NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11 is attached. In addition, this feature is not depicted on either the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle (Clayton, NC 1993) or the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for Wake County (1970), so the feature is not potentially
subject to the Neuse River riparian rules.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this information. We appreciate the opportunity
to assist with this project.
Yours truly,
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Alexander P. (Sandy) Smith
Senior Project Manager
Attachment

VAt
rL
oz
Z
7.
T
AI.
*,Vp, r

2013 National Geographi-
d.T
.. �� �1 ��+► i f : i
ir
r'1yJtfk:j ���v 3:4 �
RALEIGH
GARNER-"
�° f
in a+ '.��. i t4 t�•�.•`�'.'ti( 14�{ri�tit-, - ; Y1
021
v i0.r`
Prepared for:
1W. L4
� ,• ,fir +4;���' ��� I . � f ;
z+ r ,� + ,�* - ► - ,, . y �C- � �; � Feet WP
r ,. • * . ,;, tvaao5 sb1
COUNTY
Gin Branch crossing area
Stream verification area
%, .+ iiM -
Id ' - �*_�• ,. � ��wf',. i
,f 1
JOHNSTON or,
COUNTY
Tdmipseed Road- •» fir.°' �
9.000 500 0 1,000
Feet
Legend
Project area
Project:
TURNIPSEED
NATURE PARK
Wake County, NC
Title:
DELINEATION
EXTENSION
AND
STREAM
DETERMINATION
Notes
1. Background imagery source:
2013 color ortho photography
provided by the NC OneMap
Program (online, supported by
the INC Geographic Information
*_i: Coordination Council).
2. 4 -foot elevation contours
are generated from 2007 Light
Distance and Ranging (LiDAR)
data generated by the NC
N Floodplain Mapping Program
and provided by the NC
Department of Transportation.
Invest gation areas
-- Stream location. delineated September 2015
Drawn by: SGD
Wetland location, delineated September 2015
Date. Sept 2015
Approximate stream location. delineated October 2014
Scale: As shown
Approximate wetland location. delineated October 2014 Project No-: 15-025
Field -located data pont
Major (named) streams FIGURE
NCOOT roads
4 -foot elevation contours 1

h/ATCHIINE EROS NORTH _
mt
'� �/� ZEROS CENTRAL
Ah
,�t
r W
100,
yv� QC� ►2h1'�1: ` r
ig
O` b
-' -� ��' � ��R-E��►1 �;� t�.� t-�C�.� roti AS
MO
a•� / C hST \l: (l l -� Zti "� W 2ci o U
War
L '
cu
Li
• a � �-� '�' yJ y i L C
L---- ------ — — — —— —�,. 3
/aA HUNEERO�SCEITTRAL Due E172011
fi--------������� EROS
- xZ..,W.4'• t.ti
K-3

NC Division of Water Quality —Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Norm Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site !�rYet <G.a �t/� Latitude: ^�f 3OlU
Evaluator: f� y, (V/ �� % County: Longitude:
Total Points:
.,...e.e.,..:sr"mrn� w� on• r_i- rmination (circle one) IOther
Stream is at least mte►mdttnr Phemeral Intermittent Perennial a 9Quad Name.
y
IV
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = Absent
Weak
Moderate
—..
-- Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank- 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
_ _
1
1
2
2
3
3
3 In -channel structure ex riffle -pool step -pool 0
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate — _ 0
05
2
' 2
3
— 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
1
Yes = 3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits !
1--
2
3
8. Headcuts 0
1
24 Amphibians
3
9. Grade control 0
1
1
1.5
10. Natural valley 1 0
5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel ; _— Nom 0)
Yes = 3
- anihual ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B- Hvdroloov iSubtotal = -t? 1
12 Presence of Baseflow
-- 0 — 1 -
— --- 2 - -
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria'7D--
1_
_ _ 2
0.5
0
_
14 Leaf litter f5 1
15 Sediment on plants or debris
05
1
15
16 Organic debris lines or piles
_
0 05
1
1.5
17. Sod -based evidence of high water table?
No 0
Yes = 3
G. Bioloav (Subtotal = 1
18 Fibrous roots in streambed
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
1 3
3
2
2
— 10
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0)
1
2
3
21 Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22 Fish
$
-- 0.5
1.5
_
23 Crayfish _
05
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
j 0)
05
1
V5
25. Algae
0 '
05
1
1.5
_ _
26. Wetland plants in streambed
—+—
FACW = 0 75 OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
;.
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of
Notes: Ft *jm -'tr/i Y `''" ` ". Lt
anual
-Jt°01►C a Gres e
kVA i?
Sketch
41