20151318 Ver 2_401 Application_20180318

February 27, 2018
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Attention: Ms. Crystal Amschler
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project (SDIP)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Dear Ms. Amschler and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is submitting this Pre -Construction
Notification (PCN) for impacts to waters of the U.S. in accordance with Department of the Army Regional General
Permit (RGP) 163, which authorizes the discharge of dredged or fill material in waters of the U.S. associated with
storm water drainage improvement projects and flood reduction activities conducted by CSWS. The proposed
project will involve stream channel improvements and repairs associated with storm drainage improvements,
which will result in the permanent impact (with no loss of channel) to 1,327 linear feet (LF) of unnamed tributaries
of Stewart Creek located in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Proposed impacts include 1,268 LF of bank grading, matting and planting, and installation of log sills, vanes, and
log riffles. These impacts were previously authorized under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3 and NWP 27 (USACE
Action ID SAW -2016-00221, NCDWR # 15-1318), which expired 3/18/2017. Additionally, 59 LF of channel repairs
are proposed upstream of Royston Road. This area had been previously impacted with bank matting and
installation of in -channel reno mattresses in association with culvert and headwall upgrades. These features were
installed improperly by the contractor, resulting in restrictions to aquatic life passage. Additionally, though details
of this impact were included in the above -referenced PCN, they were not properly enumerated and authorized.
With this PCN, CSWS is seeking both after -the -fact authorization for the current existing impacts upstream of
Royston Road coupled with authorization for the proposed repairs to this area, In addition reauthorization of the
channel restoration downstream of Royston Road under the new RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147.

Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
As this project involves permanent impacts to greater than 500 LF of stream channel, written confirmation and
approval of this PCN from the Wilmington District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is required.
Proposed impacts associated with this project described herein are also authorized under North Carolina Division
of Water Resources (DWR) Water Quality General Certification (GC) No. 4147. As the proposed project includes
natural bank/channel stabilization for more than 500 LF, written concurrence from DWR is required for
authorization under GC 4147.
The location of the project area is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), and a 2016 Aerial Photograph /
Proposed Impacts Map (Figure 2).
In support of this application, please find enclosed the following:
Figures: Site Vicinity (Figure 1), 2016 Aerial Photograph / Proposed Impacts Map (Figure 2)
Appendix I: Pre -Construction Notification (PCN);
Appendix II: Site Photographs;
Appendix III: Restoration Area Engineering Plans
Appendix IV: Upstream Bed Stabilization Area Repair Plans / Initial Stabilization Plans
Appendix V: Previous Agency Approvals
Appendix VI: Stream Assessment Methodology (SAM) Rating Form
Project Background
The proposed project is located along a tributary of Stewart Creek (Stream 1) in the vicinity of Royston Road and
Camp Greene Street in the Camp Greene neighborhood of Charlotte. Prior to project conception, storm water
infrastructure around Stream 1 was undersized and deteriorating, the channel was experiencing extreme down -
cutting, bank erosion, and over -widening, which was threating local properties. Around 2015, CSWS began work
designing storm drainage improvements for this area, including: 1) culvert replacement / cast -in-place culvert
lining for the culverts under Royston Road and bed and bank stabilization for the upstream channel, 2) upsizing
and replacement of backyard culverts between 2851 and 2819 Royston Road, and 3) extensive channel restoration
and enhancement between 2811 Royston Road and the culvert under Camp Green Street.
On December 22, 2015, Kimley-Horn and Associates (Kimley-Horn) submitted a Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination (PJD) for the project area and a PCN seeking authorization for project impacts under NWP 3 and
27. The PCN provided by Kimley-Horn enumerated impacts associated with pipe replacements and channel
restoration efforts, but failed to account for proposed channel stabilization impacts upstream of Royston Road,
though design sheets for this work were included in the submittal. The USACE confirmed the PJD and NWP
authorization in a February 2, 2016 response (see Appendix V), though the NWPs under which it was authorized
expired on March 18, 2017.
Culvert replacement and repair associated with the project occurred in 2017, along with the bank grading and bed
stabilization upstream of Royston Road. The upstream ends of the culverts at this area were incorrectly installed
at the same invert elevation (as opposed to one culvert being installed at a flood stage elevation), reno mattress
bed stabilization had been installed width -wise (as opposed to length -wise) resulting in an overwide channel, and
banks were stabilized using non -degradable plastic mesh erosion control fabric. Due to the incorrect installation,
February 27, 2018 2

Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
no surface flow was present over the reno mattresses, and aquatic life movement was significantly hindered (see
photos 8-10, Appendix II). During a June 15, 2017 site visit by Alan Johnson of DWR, and Isaac Hinson and Helen
Simonson of CSWS, it became apparent that the channel stabilization upstream of Royston Road was installed
incorrectly and not properly authorized.
CSWS designed a repair plan for this area that properly meets design guidelines while also satisfying DWR aquatic
life passage requirements. With this PCN, CSWS is seeking both after -the -fact authorization for the current
existing impacts upstream of Royston Road and authorization for the proposed repairs to this area, as well as
reauthorization of the channel restoration downstream of Royston Road under the new RGP 163 / WQC No. 4100.
Proposed Project Impacts
Proposed jurisdictional impacts associated with this project are detailed in Appendices III and IV, and depicted on
the 2016 Aerial Photograph / Project Impacts Map (Figure 2).
Impact S1 involves 1,268 LF of bank grading, matting and planting and installation of log sills vanes and log riffles
along Stream 1 between the pipe outfall downstream of Royston Road and the culvert under Camp Green Street.
The existing channel throughout this area is highly incised, and extreme bank erosion is occurring in many areas.
These impacts are considered permanent but will not result in the loss of waters. This proposed channel
enhancement work was authorized under NWP 27 (SAW -2016-00221) on February 4, 2016, which expired March
18, 2017. Full designs for this impact are included in Appendix III.
Impact S2 involves repairs to 59 LF of Stream 1 upstream of the culvert under Royston Road at 2822 Royston
Road. This work includes removal of the reno mattresses in the bed of the channel and plastic erosion control
mesh along the channel banks which had been previously installed in association with paired culvert upgrades.
The over -widened banks will be filled in and repaired by installation of a stepped block wall along the lower banks
and coir matting along the upper area. The bed will be repaired with the creation of a separated paired channel
design: the left primary channel will be made up of a series of step pools transitioning the grade into the left
culvert, while the right channel will function as a floodplain bench which smoothly transitions into the right
culvert. This design was generated with input from Mr. Alan Johnson from DWR in order to maximize the
potential for aquatic life movement without requiring the re -installation of the culverts and headwall. These
impacts are considered permanent but will not result in the loss of waters. Though hard armoring will be utilized,
the activities are occurring in an area of former riprap fill (see photos 11 and 12, Appendix 2). Repair designs are
included in Appendix IV, as well as the initial project designs for the area which were included in the 2016 PCN, for
reference.
Protected Species
S&ME's consideration of potential protected species habitat began with a review of existing records obtained
from federal and state sources. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of federally -protected species
(updated April 2, 2015) was consulted for a listing of protected species documented within Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. This review identified four plant species and three animal species. Listed fauna and flora and their
federal status are identified in Table 1.
February 27, 2018

Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Table 1: Federally -Protected Flora and Fauna Summary
I . W
Federal Rank
Record Status
Habitat Present
Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
Current
No
Schweinitz's sunflower (vascular plant)
Rhus michauxii
Endangered
Current
No
Michaux's sumac (vascular plant)
Echinacea laevigata
Endangered
Current
No
Smooth coneflower (vascular plant)
Symphyotrichum georgianum
Candidate
Current
No
Georgia aster (vascular plant)
Lasmigono decorata
Endangered
Current
No
Carolina heelsplitter (invertebrate animal)
Halioeetus leucocepholus
BGPA
Current
No
Bald eagle (vertebrate animal)
Myotis septentrionalis
Threatened
Probable/Potential
Yes
Northern long-eared bat (vertebrate animal)
As part of the protected species review, S&ME also reviewed the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) files of Element Occurrence (EO) and Natural Heritage Areas
available from NC OneMap. This review found no extant EOs of protected species on record within a one -mile
radius of the project area.
S&ME completed a field reconnaissance of the project area on February 19, 2017. The project area consists of
maintained residential backyards, a bamboo -dominated powerline right-of-way, and wooded riparian areas
dominated by invasive species. These are not the preferred habitat for the plant species of concern, and none of
the listed plant species were observed. The waters to be impacted are of poor habitat due to surrounding
urbanization and extreme bank erosion; these streams would, therefore, be considered unsuitable for Carolina
heelsplitter. Though Mecklenburg County is within the potential range of the northern long-eared bat, there are
no known areas of confirmed hibernation and maternity sites ("Red HUCs") within the county, though some
suitable forested habitat was present along the project site. The proposed project does not involve bridge removal
or percussive activities, and will not significantly change the overall nature and function of the local forested
habitat. As such, the proposed project has both met the criteria for the 4(d) rule exempting incidental take of
northern long-eared bat and is below the threshold established by RGP 163 that would require written
concurrence due to northern long-eared bat concerns.
We are not aware of any USFWS concerns associated with previous USACE approvals, and the proposed project
does not involve a substantially different project area from previously approved projects.
February 27, 2018

Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Cultural Resources
A review of the SHPO's "HPOWEB" GIS Web Service indicated no properties that were currently listed or
determined in the National Register of Historic Places within a half -mile radius of the project area. We are not
aware of any SHPO concerns associated with previous USACE approvals, and the proposed project does not
involve a substantially different project area from previously approved projects.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable and have been limited to what is necessary to
facilitate storm water infrastructure upgrades and stream enhancement. Repairs to the unauthorized impact area
have been designed to best allow for aquatic life passage while maintaining channel stability. Hard armoring was
limited to areas previously subject to riprap fill. Efforts have been made to limit clearing of trees within the project
corridor to the minimum amount required for safe construction of the restoration channel, and tree protection
measures will be installed to safeguard trees within the limits of disturbance that are to remain.
To prevent sedimentation of downstream portions of the affected streams, and to the extent practicable,
construction will be conducted in the dry through the use of cofferdams and pump-arounds. Temporary erosion
and sediment control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored upon
completion of the project. Banks affected by maintenance work will be matted, re -seeded, and restored to stable
conditions.
Additional Regulatory Considerations
The proposed plans were designed with the conditions of RGP 163 and GC 4147 in mind. No stream impacts are
proposed to channels classified as High Quality by NCSAM (See Appendix VI). The proposed project is not part of
a compensatory mitigation project, and no culvert construction is being proposed for the creation of high ground
on a residential or commercial property.
Upstream channel repairs have been designed to best meet aquatic live -passage requirements without requiring
the re -installation of culverts. They have also been designed in order to minimize channel destabilization and
head -cutting.
Appropriate erosion and sediment control practices will be implemented to meet water quality turbidity
standards. Best Management Practices employed for the project will be in compliance with the most recent
version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual," and the local
governing authority. Impacts have been avoided and minimized, with appropriate measures being taken during
construction to allow flow and circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. to remain unaffected. Following
construction, temporary sediment and erosion control structures will be removed. Disturbed areas adjacent to the
work site will be restored to a stable grade and d appropriately seeded with native vegetation.
February 27, 2018

Pre -Construction Notification: RGP 163 / WQC No. 4147
Royston Road Court Storm Drainage Improvements Project
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Mitigation
As the proposed project does not involve a loss of greater than 150 LF stream bed and channel, no further
mitigation measures are proposed. Repair efforts have been designed to meet the fluvial and ecological functions
of the stream. Though enhancement efforts associated with this project are designed to provide ecological uplift
to Stream 1, CMSWS has opted to not seek mitigation credit for these enhancements.
Closing
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence with
authorization of this project under RGP 163 and GC 4147. If you have questions or require additional information,
please feel free to contact Helen Simonson at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
D. David Homans
Natural Resources Project Professional
Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Vicinity
Figure 2 — Site Map
Photo Pages
February 27, 2018
3",
Kristy Smedley
Natural Resources Senior Reviewer

Figures

Appendix I - Pre -Construction Notification (PCN)

a`'oF wArE�Q�
y
T.
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 163
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes x❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes x❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes x❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Royston Road Storm Drainage Improvement Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple Owners
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agentx❑ Other, specify: Charlotte Storm Water Services
4b.
Name:
Helen Simonson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Charlotte Storm Water Services
4d.
Street address:
600 East Fourth Street
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-432-0966
4g.
Fax no.:
704-336-6586
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
David Homans
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S&ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28273
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-523-4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704-525-3953
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.234698 Longitude: -80.885347
1 c.
Property size:
5.1 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed tributary to Stewart Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
Lower Catawba River Basin (WBD HUC 03050103)
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Channel condition within the project area includes actively eroding banks. Land use adjacent to the stream and throughout its watershed is largely
made up of high density maintained residential areas, power line ROW and wooded vacant lots.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,327
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to repair and upgrade storm water infrastructure and improve the stability of the stream channels.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See "Proposed Project Impacts" section of attached letter.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenburg, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley Horn & Associates
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
PJD from 2-4-2016 (SAW -2016-00221) See Appx. V
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
SAW -2016-00221, DWR#15-1318 (See Appx. V); Refer to "Project Background" in cover letter.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑Q No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlandsx❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
No Wetland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
Stream 1 (UT Stewart)
PER
Corps
12
59
S2 P
Stabilization
Stream 1 (UT Stewart)
PER
Corps
15
1,268
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1,327
3i. Comments:
SEE "-Proposed Project Impacts" in attached letter for descriptions
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: o open water impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: No pond / lake impacts
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tempora T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: No buffer impacts.
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable and have been limited to what is necessary to facilitate storm water infrastructure
upgrades and stream enhancement. See attached letter.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
To prevent sedimentation of downstream portions of the affected streams, construction will be conducted in the dry through the use of cofferdams and
pump-arounds. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored upon completion
of the project. See attached letter.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑x No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑x No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The proposed project is a maintenance project being undertaken by a municipal stormwater authority.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑x Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes x❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yesx❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Q Yes ❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Previous impacts were not properly enumerated in an earlier PCN. See attached cover letter.
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑x No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The
proposed project will not generate wastewater.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field review did not indicate the presence of protected species or their habitat. Project area and vicinity are not located in a Designated Critical Habitat.
Review of Element Occurrences on the NC NHP files found no occurrences of threatened or endangered species within a 1-mile radius of the project
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coraI/ims/viewer. htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑x No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the HPOWEB GIS Web Service indicated no properties currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places or determined eligible
within a 0.5 mile radius of the project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris.mecklenburgcountync.gov; national flood hazard layer (NFHL) for Mecklenburg County
Helen Simonson
YEZb-T
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Appendix II - Site Photographs

4��'K
a'$
?w of Stream 1 looking downstream towards the culvert under
mp Greene Street.
)ical downstream view of Stream 1 in the portion of the
eject located behind the residences at 2637-2801 Royston
Royston Road SDIP PCN Update S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
III E Charlotte, North Carolina Taken by: D. Homans Date Taken: 2/19/2018

ew of new storm water outfall entering Stream 1 from the
ote that no riprap apron was installed.
r .k
s5 ,
8 iew of the current condition Stream 1 looking downstream at
he culvert under Royston Road.
Royston Road SDIP PCN Update S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
III S Charlotte, North Carolina Taken by: D. Homans Date Taken: 2/19/2018

Anhin
M
1
�� � n+ 3 � ' ♦ `�`. .mss,:
Few of Stream 1 looking upstream out of the proposed project
-'��lla „�� M!P ice' 7 n' - '�_Jj4. t°£34�
11View of the old upstream headwall of the Royston Road culvert,
prior to unauthorized repair work. (April 13, 2015, photo
nrnvirlarl by C r,\A/Cl
Royston Road SDIP PCN Update
Charlotte, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Taken by: D. Homans Date Taken: 2/19/2018
M,
a
,d Yt
4y
xf
c
he
10
View of the replacement headwall at the upstream end of the
Royston Road culvert.
7 Y xA
A�
W
4 9
i�
{
.L 1yw
12View
of Stream 1, looking upstream from the culvert under
Royston Road, prior to unauthorized repair work. (April 13, 2015,
Royston Road SDIP PCN Update
Charlotte, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4335-17-077 Phase 003
Taken by: D. Homans Date Taken: 2/19/2018

Appendix III - Restoration Area Engineering Plans

INDEX OF SHEETS
Cover Sheet.................................................................................... C-1.0
General Notes and Details............................................................ C-1.1
Plan and Profile ................................................................ C-2.0 - C-2.4
Details................................................................................ C-3.0 - C-3.2
Access, Erosion, and Planting Plan ............................................. C-4.0
Vegetation Notes and Details....................................................... C-4.1
Cross Sections.................................................................. C-5.0 - C-5.5
TOTAL SHEETS 18
VICINITY MAP
NTS
Begin Project
Sta. 11+50
PLANS PREPARED BY:
Kimley>>> Horzn
NC License #F-0102
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28202
Construction Plans of Proposed
Royston Road Channel Stabilization Project
Munis Code: 807020 0004
Emerald Number: SWDES00468
Project Features:
Stream Stabilization/Enhancement and Restoration
Royston Road
SHEET C-2.3
GRAPHIC SCALES
I � a
SHEET C-2.4
PE SEAL
610
Plan View .................
Maintained as R/W Line................................—
Existing Structures .........................................
ESS�0
60
5 -
c
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
EPr
GINE O
CIP"Tu .
Q��E CLat1E��.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
Vert. Profile .............
MANAGEMENT
e
Construction Plans of Proposed
Royston Road Channel Stabilization Project
Munis Code: 807020 0004
Emerald Number: SWDES00468
Project Features:
Stream Stabilization/Enhancement and Restoration
Royston Road
SHEET C-2.3
GRAPHIC SCALES
I � a
SHEET C-2.4
d Project
1. 24+14
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Contract Administration
Storm Water
Landscape Management
CDOT - Design
CDOT - Implementation
CMU
Storm Water Project Manager
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line .................................. RQW — —
210 410
610
Plan View .................
Maintained as R/W Line................................—
Existing Structures .........................................
20 40
60
Horz. Profile ............
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fence................................................................
4 8
12
Vert. Profile .............
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
e
Sidewalk/Utility, Easement ............................ SUE
5 10
15
Cross Section ...........
Existing Gas Line ........................................... c
c
d Project
1. 24+14
RECOMMENDED
FOR CONSTRUCTION
Contract Administration
Storm Water
Landscape Management
CDOT - Design
CDOT - Implementation
CMU
Storm Water Project Manager
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
Proposed Property Line .................................. RQW — —
—
Existing Property Line ...................................
Maintained as R/W Line................................—
Existing Structures .........................................
Railroad Tracks ..............................................
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fence................................................................
Slope Stake Line ............................................. c�
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
e
Sidewalk/Utility, Easement ............................ SUE
SUE
Storm Drainage Easement ............................ SUE
SDE
Existing Gas Line ........................................... c
c
Existing Water Line ....................................... w
W
Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ ss
ss
Existing Underground Telecommunications UT
UT
Existing Underground Electric ..................... UE
UE
Existing Storm Drainage ............................... — — — — — — -
— — —
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................�
ExistingTree..........................................................................................0
Existing Water Meter.............................................................................
WM
❑
WV
Existing Water Valve............................................................................. >a
Gas Valve.................................................................................
GVExisting
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole.........................................................�
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole.......................................................�
Existing Storm Drain Manhole...............................................................�
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole...........................................................0
Existing Telephone Manhole.................................................................0
Proposed Telephone Manhole...............................................................�
Existing Electric Manhole.....................................................................0
Proposed Electric Manhole...................................................................
Existing Catch Basin..............................................................................8
ProposedCatch Basin............................................................................�
Existing Light Pole.................................................................................
#
ProposedLight Pole................................................................................
Existing Utility Pole................................................................................'0.
GuyWire............................................................................................ —<
ProposedUtility Pole.............................................................................. )k
IronPin....................................................................................................
ExistingFire Hydrant............................................................................ b
ProposedFire Hydrant..........................................................................
ExistingDrop Inlet..................................................................................0
Proposed Drop Inlet................................................................................
AccessibleRamp...................................................................................®
Tree Protection.............................................................................
Proposed Guardrail...................................................................
SiltFence.....................................................................................
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk ...................
—
ProposedAsphalt Pavement ........................................................
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch..............................................................
ProposedGravel...........................................................................
Proposed Pavement Removal ......................................................
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots ..................................
!�•
l.dltilLlll 1 1 JG.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
APPROVED
Bid Set No.
CITY ENGINEER DATE
W
=i

s
0
m
i
o
a`
I
o
3I
U
GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS:
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY -
GO NCRETE
CCORDINGLY:CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI).
o ASPHALT - (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.08
INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
(RESIDENTAL) TWO INCH SF9.56 COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE
BASE (ABC) COURSE.
o GRAVEL - SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE
SIDEWALK SHALL BEFOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS,
PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS,
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES A MINIMUM OF 1
WEEPH OLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER
FABRIC AND FILLED W/#78 STONE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK.
UTILITIES:
UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIZES, DEPTHS, OR FOR
COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY
LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS
OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS
FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF
HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY.
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER ANDWATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
UTILITY OWNERS. VIA THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR
DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
STAY A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET AWAY FROM ALL UTILITY POLES.
o FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL 0 1-800-632-4949.
o FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL CONTACT
PROJECT MANAGER & UTILITY COORDINATOR.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTSTO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES.
GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. VIA THE
CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES,
VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY.
ABBREVIATIONS
BASE SURVEY DATA
EXISTING CONDITIONS TAKEN FROM GROUND SURVEY BY JAMES MAUNEY AND
ASSOCIATES DATED 9-21-2015. ALL COORDINATES BASED ON NAD 83 AND
NAVD 88.
SUBSURFACE PLANS:
ABAND............................ABANDONED
PROPOSED PLAN LEGEND
NTS......................
-NOT TO SCALE
TOLERANCE:
AID.................................ALceBRAlc
®
o/H..........................
..OVERHEAD
TREE REMOVAL
DIFFERENCE ASPH.._
..........................ASPHALT
OC...____......._........ON
CENTER
STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE, STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE, AND RETAINING
APPROX..........................APPROXIMATELY
a PROPOSED STREAM BANKFULL
PAVT........................PAVEMENT
WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ±0.10 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS,
B/C.................................BACK
OF CURB
PC............................POINT
OF CURVATURE
AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF ±0.05 FEET.
BIT:
PERM........................HER
MAN ENT
SM. ..................................BENCH
MARK
PG............................PAGE
STREAM IMPROVEMENT STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF ±0.10 FEET,
BRG.................................BEARING
PI.............................POINT
OF INT
AND A PLANIMETRIC TOLERANCE OF ±0.50 FEET,
CB...................................CATCH
BASIN
PK .................
PK NAIL SET
C&G................................CURB
AND GUTTER
PP............................POWER
POLE
SIDE SLOPES:
CL..................................CLEARANCE
C/L
PROP ........................PROPOSED
FENCE .....................
CHAIN LINK FENCE
PSE ..........................PERM
SW ESMT
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
CMP................................CORRUGATED
MTL
PT............................POINT
OF TANGENCY
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL
( )
PIPE GONG.............................CONCRETE
PVI...........................POINT
OF VERT INT
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
CONST.............................CONSTRUCTION
PUE..........................PERM
r
UTILITY ESMT
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
DS...................................DEED
DCB................................DOUBLE
BOOK
CB
...............................RADIUS
RT ..............................
RIGHT
EROSION CONTROL:
DI....................................DROP
INLET
RCP ..........................
REINFORCED GONG
DIA..................................DIAMETER
PIPE RELOC ......................
RELOCATE
DW...................................DRIVEWAY
R/W ..........................
RICHIT OF WAY
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
DIM..................................DIMENSION
5...............................SOUTH
APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE
E....................................EAST/FASTING
SD............................STORM
DRAIN
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS
E A..............................EACH
SF............................SQUARE
FOOTSR
SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR
LEV................................ELEVATION
EEV
FENCE ..............SPLIT
RAIL FENCE
SHALL FOLLOW THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON SHEET C-4.0
FOP.................................EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
SS ............................
SANITARY SEWER
ESMT_ .......... - ..........
_-EASEMENT
STA..........................STATION
EXIST...............................EXISTING
STD..........................STANDARD
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
F/C.................................FACE
OF CURB
SW............................SIDEWALK
FES..................................FLARED
END SECTION
TAN ..........................
TANGENT
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT
FIT.. .................................FIRE
HYDRANT
TCE...........................TEMP
CONST ESMT
INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS,
FOC.................................FIBER
OPTIC CABLE
TEM P ........................
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS.
GV...................................GAS
VALVE
TP............................TRAVERSE
POINT
HORIZ..............................HORIZONTAL
T/W ..........................
TEST WIRE
SAWGUTS:
INT..................................INTERSECTION
TYR..........................
TYPICAL
INV..................................INVERT
U/G............................
UNDER GROUND
IP....................................IRON
PIN SET
V........................VERTICAL
CURVE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR
OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR
L .....................................
LENGTH
VERTERT.........................
VERTICAL
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE
LF....................................LINEAR
FOOTAGE
W..............................WEST
1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
LT....................................LEFT
W/............................WITH
REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TIE-IN TO FACE OF
Ib....................................POUND
WM...........................WATER
METER W
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER.
LP...................................LIGHT
POLE
VAULT ..................
WATER VAULT
MAX.................................MAXIMUM
WV ...........................
WATER VALVE
MIN..................................MINIMUM
60p ..........................
SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET
PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE:
MONO..............................MONOLITHIC
................................FOOT
mph................................MILES
PER HOUR
................................INCH
CDOTHAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED.
MTL. ................................METAL
CDOT AND E&PM HAVE AGREED ON THE STREET CUTS FOR WHICH A PAVEMENT DEGRADATION
III,, N.....................................NORTH/NORTHING
FEE IS REQUIRED. THE DEGRADATION FEE ASSESSMENT SHALL BE PAID VIA INTERNAL CITY
MECHANISMS (DTI) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE "WORK
AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (WATCH).
BASE SURVEY DATA
EXISTING CONDITIONS TAKEN FROM GROUND SURVEY BY JAMES MAUNEY AND
ASSOCIATES DATED 9-21-2015. ALL COORDINATES BASED ON NAD 83 AND
NAVD 88.
SUBSURFACE PLANS:
PROPOSED PLAN LEGEND
V
vvvv
PROPOSED TEMPORARY HAUL ROAD
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE
®
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STAGING AREA
HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.
TREE REMOVAL
I PROPOSED STREAM CENTERLINE
MAIL BOXES:
PROPOSED STREAM TOE
a PROPOSED STREAM BANKFULL
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107-12 OF THE
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH
c c c PROPOSED CUT LINE
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
FENCES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE THAT FALL WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION
BARRIERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL LINES IN
ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES/SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS
NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING
SHALL BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.)
USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OR SIDEWALK.
USE CLD STO. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT
CURBING MUST USE CLD STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLD STD. 40.02
AND WITH SECTION 1000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. WHEN THE
TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY TREES. IN ADDITION,
ALL TREES LOCATED WITHIN THE LOD THAT ARE TO REMAIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE INSPECTED
BE THE CITY TO VERIFY THEY ARE SUITABLE TO REMAIN.
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION STAKING THE PROJECT TEAM (CONTRACTOR, CITY INSPECTOR, CITY ARBORIST
AND CONSULTANT, IF APPLICABLE) WILL HOLD AN ON-SITE MEETING TO ENSURE THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE AND THAT TREES PROPOSED FOR PROTECTION ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. THE TEAM WILL
WALK THE PROJECT AREA AND AGREE ON THE TREES TO BE PROTECTED AND THOSE TO REMOVE, DISCUSS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL TREES TO PROTECT THAT WERE NOT
ORIGINALLY MARKED AS SUCH. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE GIVEN APPROVAL FOR TREE REMOVAL, IN
WRITING, AFTER APPROPRIATE TREE PROTECTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR
REMOVAL CAN BEGIN.
THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR TREE PROTECTION INSTALLED AROUND ADDITIONAL TREES
IDENTIFIED FOR PROTECTION.
THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR "IN-KIND" REPLACEMENT OF TREES DAMAGED THAT HAVE
BEEN MARKED FOR PROTECTION OR NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL.
r r r PROPOSED FILL LINE
PROPOSED RIP RAP
PROPOSED CHANNEL FILL
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE
PROPOSED PROFILE LEGEND
EXISTING GROUND AT PROPOSED CENTERLINE
a EXISTING GROUND AT PROPOSED RIGHT BANKFULL
EXISTING GROUND AT PROPOSED LEFT BANKFULL
PROPOSED CHANNEL BOTTOM
- - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED BANKFULL
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PROPOSED ROCK AND ROLL RIFFLE
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
V
vvvv
PROPOSED TEMPORARY HAUL ROAD
O O O
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
®
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STAGING AREA
X
TREE REMOVAL
TREE PROTECTION
- PROPOSED SAFETY FENCE
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPOSED PLANTING PLAN LEGEND
ZONE A
V
vvvv
ZONE B
O O O
ZONE C
®
ZONE D
O O O
ZONE E
15.
KnowwhaPs below.
Call before you dig.
o G�
x� sm V
I�vI- -,
= J
in
W
I

F"■
2—
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #1
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 11+50 TO 15+00
C
AS REQ' 12,2•
*TIE TO BANKFULL WIDTH
EXISTING
GROUND
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
2—
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #2
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 15+00 TO 19+80
C I
AS REQ' 12 2'
"TIE TO BANKFULL WIDTH
EXISTING
GROUND
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
III
AS REQ'D
*TE TO BENCH
EXISTING 0,5'
caouND
?'1
(OUTSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER) 3.0
I
25' BANKFULL POOL
-TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
3�
(OUTSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
1.1
2.5' BANKFULL POOL DEPT
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #3
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 19+80 TO 24+14
1
14.4'
BANKFULL WIDTH
BANKFUL BANKFULL
BENCH BENCH v
5' 1.5'
ROYSTON CREEK
POOL #1
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 11+50 TO 15+00
14.4'
BANKFULL WIDTH
BANKFUI1L BANKFULL
1 BENCH BENCH
C 1.5'
TIETO
EXISTING
BANKFULL GROUND
BENCH —
0.5'
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
ROYSTON CREEK
POOL #2
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 15+00 TO 24+14
TYPICAL SECTIONS
BANKFULL
BENCH
5.0'
AS REQ'D
BENCH -TIE TO
0.5' 1,E STING
GROUND
`L,
L 1 C,
3
(INSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
-TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
(INSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
*TE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
M.
SEE PLANS BY OTHERS
69:
68f
68
68(
67(
a
w 3
x
0
a
692
T:
x
w
C 0.
AS REQ'D 11.0,
-HE To
EXISTING
BENCH BANKFULL WIDTH
p, 5'
GROUNDA
BANKFUL
zU I ��pZ
Qom»
BENCH
—
2.0
27
sn
2—
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #1
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 11+50 TO 15+00
C
AS REQ' 12,2•
*TIE TO BANKFULL WIDTH
EXISTING
GROUND
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
2—
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #2
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 15+00 TO 19+80
C I
AS REQ' 12 2'
"TIE TO BANKFULL WIDTH
EXISTING
GROUND
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
III
AS REQ'D
*TE TO BENCH
EXISTING 0,5'
caouND
?'1
(OUTSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER) 3.0
I
25' BANKFULL POOL
-TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
3�
(OUTSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
1.1
2.5' BANKFULL POOL DEPT
ROYSTON CREEK
RIFFLE #3
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 19+80 TO 24+14
1
14.4'
BANKFULL WIDTH
BANKFUL BANKFULL
BENCH BENCH v
5' 1.5'
ROYSTON CREEK
POOL #1
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 11+50 TO 15+00
14.4'
BANKFULL WIDTH
BANKFUI1L BANKFULL
1 BENCH BENCH
C 1.5'
TIETO
EXISTING
BANKFULL GROUND
BENCH —
0.5'
BANKFULL
BENCH
2.0'
ROYSTON CREEK
POOL #2
SEE PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STA 15+00 TO 24+14
TYPICAL SECTIONS
BANKFULL
BENCH
5.0'
AS REQ'D
BENCH -TIE TO
0.5' 1,E STING
GROUND
`L,
L 1 C,
3
(INSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
-TIE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
(INSIDE OF BEND/MEANDER)
*TE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
M.
SEE PLANS BY OTHERS
69:
68f
68
68(
67(
a
w 3
x
0
a
692
T:
x
w
o a
-G, ooG,
�I�
+ 6
00
�
m
zU I ��pZ
Qom»
O
W
U
C,
/EXISTING GRADE A
EXISTING CENTERLINE
48"Concrete Pipe
O 0.8X
Concrete Pipe
O 1.4X
672
10+00
588
584
580
576
672
10+50 11+00 11+35
Fe e
J
mll �III�I� v e
UII D:�IIIz l
e TA PARCEL: 06�/ 84-18 '
M KLENBURG COU
SII I I �B 21n7, PG 359 (TR�Y /
ACT 1)
LOT "Q, BLOCK 35, \,
SII Q MARSF,ESTATES W
m i MB 6, PG-70�
CD
III I Le ,
CD CD
30 EXISTING FLEAS WAL a—e
_ _
CDI IIILEY= =68— = Q U
oitB2_
O
ILI d --
o 80 — K BR W
EXIST 'n III ���� � CREE ANCK Z 2
B=0
R=66.14 =— _—
BOTTOM=679.Ot(48") 6�5 _ J
(DEBRIS IN'CB") W
`
CHAIN INK E SDE6E=' U W
FENCE ° CHAIN AK FENCE - Q (n
EXIST C
NO WORK FROM 10+X TO 11+50
J I II � I
GR=686. LOWEST VENT
BOTTOM=%.4t �� EL=689.04
(DEBRIS IN'CB')
I TAX PARCEL: 0 1619 '
SHELLY A. LANIER '
I DB 8189, PG 912
LOT 14, BLO�K 35,
MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 07
o�
s
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
Co.
KnawwhBPfi below.
Call before you dig.
in
a
00
�
O
a
O
W
U
C,

�l ■
N!
668
11+35 11+50
a
68f
O H
oo�
UNC
gnaw
o w
Z
w
684
E
68(
o
0
67E
E
-
S.
J
8.7
W
E
a
67:
�l ■
N!
668
11+35 11+50
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
STA 11+50
VAN ��
SE \�
00000 �kl �
DB 8��
LOT 14, BL
MARSH E
M B
12+00
TREE PROTECTION (TYP)
RELOCATE BLDG.
CONTRACTOR TO RESET PROPERTY
IRONS IF DISTURBED DURING
CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
SEE PLANS BY OTHERS THE CHARLOTTE —MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION
DB 21707. PC 349
12+50
13+00
13+50
14+0
0 14+50 15+00
i
I =
I o D `c"" FFE 685.1
GN 18"M CONC PAD
CONG
COLIC
(BEL. I � (BELOW) \
PAD
>7 TAX 06
JOHNOHN wi ON
/ 119589, PG 862
uHPaveD aeEa LOT BLOCK 37, MARIH
AX0'IRIAR EIR 084-16 ESTA�ES— —
GLORIA G. R ADAN AND 1B 6, PC 707 /
° D, JOIN RAMADAN ,
— J — B8 1PG 102
/J 0T 91 BLOCK 37, MARSH ESTAT LL
ID REPLACE M=G 707 Q
IS LF FENCf e �
e�e^N
X E k �� V
sp X x e y h
E\ E I �
SID
co
6�aZ
�AZ wtC/co
SDE
/ 6 e e�ee�—�e� sc
�—e 0\ �
/ 36 G cw — --\i
18"P \ TMECKLEN URGAX PARCE\L 7COUNTY\
) DB 21707, PC 351 (TRACT �)
\ \ 1\ A 1 \
- CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH CITY
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY TREE
REMOVAL (TYP)
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
in
a
00
O H
oo�
UNC
gnaw
o w
Z
w
�
J
8.7
W
c�
~moo
n>
or w
LINE
LL
con
�m
J + n
N
J+r
fl�N,p
U II
UQw
EXISTING GRADE AT XISTING CENTERLIN
Z�II
O
�
pN�
o a
Z
Z
�pON
v+ n
m
684
680
15/PROPOSED
OQ>
J N w
E%.STING GRADE AT 11 OPOSED CENTERLIN
CENTEF
—X
-0.2a%
ROPOSED BANKF
� _
_
\
_
Q -
0.36%
—
676
PROP. 54 RCP AND L WALL
BEYOND CBY OTHERS)
STA: 11+58.39—
ELEV: 678.89
672
RIFFLE #1 AND POOL
#1 (TYPICALS APRIL
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
STA 11+50
VAN ��
SE \�
00000 �kl �
DB 8��
LOT 14, BL
MARSH E
M B
12+00
TREE PROTECTION (TYP)
RELOCATE BLDG.
CONTRACTOR TO RESET PROPERTY
IRONS IF DISTURBED DURING
CONSTRUCTION (TYP)
SEE PLANS BY OTHERS THE CHARLOTTE —MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION
DB 21707. PC 349
12+50
13+00
13+50
14+0
0 14+50 15+00
i
I =
I o D `c"" FFE 685.1
GN 18"M CONC PAD
CONG
COLIC
(BEL. I � (BELOW) \
PAD
>7 TAX 06
JOHNOHN wi ON
/ 119589, PG 862
uHPaveD aeEa LOT BLOCK 37, MARIH
AX0'IRIAR EIR 084-16 ESTA�ES— —
GLORIA G. R ADAN AND 1B 6, PC 707 /
° D, JOIN RAMADAN ,
— J — B8 1PG 102
/J 0T 91 BLOCK 37, MARSH ESTAT LL
ID REPLACE M=G 707 Q
IS LF FENCf e �
e�e^N
X E k �� V
sp X x e y h
E\ E I �
SID
co
6�aZ
�AZ wtC/co
SDE
/ 6 e e�ee�—�e� sc
�—e 0\ �
/ 36 G cw — --\i
18"P \ TMECKLEN URGAX PARCE\L 7COUNTY\
) DB 21707, PC 351 (TRACT �)
\ \ 1\ A 1 \
- CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH CITY
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY TREE
REMOVAL (TYP)
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
in
a
00
O H
�
W
con

Fl■
680—
676
DAISY L. MAY AND
SAMUEL MAY
�1 DB 16693, PG 610
LOT 7, BLOCK 37,
'
MARSH ESTATES
pwMN
68C
676
p o'O
Tl
�<�
z in
ij
z
p N
n rj
U + n
�
t~n¢���II
z w
o
z
�
C
p o
���
v
z
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING CENTE
RLINE
w
pMro
II
o w
z_
j
w
`D
in v+i�
oaf
mw
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED CENTERL
�nN
�u;m
oaJ
U+n
z�LL'
ornw l°'
IIn
//PROPOSED CENTERLINE +
OPOSED BANKFULL m o it j
-0.69%
jn �+
J N w
_77
0.62%
_
—
--- ---_
—
`--- --� —_ _—
672
_
_— ---
672
668
l
668
RIFFLE #2 AND POOL #2 (TYPICALS APPLYI
15+00
15+50
16+00
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-14
TAX PPRCEL: 067-084 15
__,T HN W. MASON
DB 19589, PG 862
LOT 8, BLOCK 37, MARS
ESTATES
' MB 6, PG 707
p
UTILITY POLE TO BE
\ RELOCATED BY OTHERS \
o\ \
16+50
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-13
GERI 0. WIERTEL
AND HUSBAND,
EDWARD J. WIERTEL
DB 20402, PG 55
LOT 6, BLOCK 37,
MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 707
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-37
THE CHARLOTTE —MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION
DB 21707, PG 349
17+00
17+50
18+00
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-12 TAX PARCEL: 067-084-11
KAREN LYNN WATFORD PP DARRYL GRAVES
DB 12163, PG 249 DB 25381, PG 507
LOT 5, BLOCK 37, LOT 4, BLOCK 37, 1
MARSH ESTATES MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 707 MB 6 PG 707 1
DEEP X 8' VIDE'; 16' LONG
IFILL
E AND REPLACEENCEe�q _ /
18+50
NpR?H
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
W.A
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
in
i�
W
I
DAISY L. MAY AND
SAMUEL MAY
�1 DB 16693, PG 610
LOT 7, BLOCK 37,
'
MARSH ESTATES
— — 680 — MB 6. PG 707
TAX PPRCEL: 067-084 15
__,T HN W. MASON
DB 19589, PG 862
LOT 8, BLOCK 37, MARS
ESTATES
' MB 6, PG 707
p
UTILITY POLE TO BE
\ RELOCATED BY OTHERS \
o\ \
16+50
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-13
GERI 0. WIERTEL
AND HUSBAND,
EDWARD J. WIERTEL
DB 20402, PG 55
LOT 6, BLOCK 37,
MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 707
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-37
THE CHARLOTTE —MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION
DB 21707, PG 349
17+00
17+50
18+00
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-12 TAX PARCEL: 067-084-11
KAREN LYNN WATFORD PP DARRYL GRAVES
DB 12163, PG 249 DB 25381, PG 507
LOT 5, BLOCK 37, LOT 4, BLOCK 37, 1
MARSH ESTATES MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 707 MB 6 PG 707 1
DEEP X 8' VIDE'; 16' LONG
IFILL
E AND REPLACEENCEe�q _ /
18+50
NpR?H
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
W.A
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
in
i�
W
I

mI
680
681
wU
w
OMN
NORTH
QI O
w
U a
K
�
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
0
a
O ~
FSI
zN
Z
�
�
Knowwhays below.
s
Call before you dig.
EXISTIEJ
NG GRA EAT
-
o opo
PROPOSED CENTE ILINE
Lj
�Mm
671
676
o
a
jl
a w
EXISTING GRADE T
EXISTING CENTERLI E
o o co
o in w
o
o rn
a w
CEN ERLINE
z
/ROPOSED
/
w
�fOROPOSED
z
BAN FULL
672
co II >
24.04%
_ — _
67:
— — —
R gAw
ssa_
661
— — —
-(.3
%
664
— — — — — 66,
RIFFLE # AND POOL #2 (TYP CALS APPLY)
RIFFLE #
AND POOL #2 (TYP CALS APPLY)
18+50
CD
Ln
+00
N
N
19+00
I I
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-10
' LORENE J. STINSON AND
WIFE, PEGGY A. STINSON
' DB 14500, PG 439
LOT 3, BLOCK 37,
MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 707
REMOVE AND REPLACE
wI 65 LF FENCE
e
e 10
' X
WIRE & CHAIN OE
19+50
II
I TAX PARCEL. 067-084-09
JAMES A. WATTS
DB 6476, PG 186
LOT 2, BLOCK 37,
MARSH ESTATES
I MB 6, PG 707
UTILITY POLE TO BE
RELOCATED/BY OTHERS
> e
REMOVE/AND REPLACE FENCI
OUTS. E TOP OF Bp�K
r OS �
to W
W W
SEE
SDE
Z_ SDE SUE eSD�e—e
J LU
W e '
U W
(n / MAINTAIN POSITIVE
QFLOW AT DITCH
20 LF OF 2"-12" RIP RAP 0.5' J
DEEP X 10' WIDE X 20' LONG
20+00
SDE
SDE
20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00
0
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-08 /
MECKLENBURG COUNTY '
DB 21707, PG 359 (TRACT 2)
#2601 ROYSTON ROAD o
2
—e�e e
e _ \ o
we e—e
e�
670 6�0
668
8fi9— �
-
-- - - - - - B 667 LV tt
B N C4
LIJ
W W
670 K/gRA ? '_
_ ct)
LU
e / _
40 1Ue e SUE
Q
� 1
680 1 1 1 11 1
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-37 1 1 1
THE CHARLOTTE —MECKLENBURG
BOARD OF EDUCATION Q ��� TAX PARCEL: 067-084-08
' MECKLEN URG COUNTY 1
DB 21 707, PG 349 4
I
CCDB 21707, 70 359 (TRACT 2)
#2601 OYSTON ROAD
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-07
MW GROUP, LLC
DB 13611, PG 557
LOT 9, MARSH ESTATES
MB 6, PG 545
# 1808 CAMP GREENE STREET
I
0
0
in
00
O
O
i�
W
I
wU
w
NORTH
QI O
w
U a
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
0
a
O ~
FSI
zN
�
0 a
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
U
o opo
in
00
O
O
i�
W
I

Fl■
67E
672
66E
664
66C
656
22+00
Z
Q
4
�
F
a
U N
+
z
M
vi
x
a
a M N
N o
au>
X STINI 1 GRADE AT El
w
–
Ll
K
o
XISTING CENTERLINE
M M
UIMOo�
\
/
XISTIN GRADE AT J
N
p
?
c5-
PROPO ED CENTERLINE c
Ur+i0
II>
X+�
�?
O O
M>
pN�
aQ>
U
N w
o
ROP SED CENTERLINE
� O
U
wNw
H
\
ROP SED BANKFULL o
R
w
S./g%
e �
-0.24%
-4,0V
60' ete Pipe
e00.1%
80 CananD(I PT.
- -- - -�
O 1.9% IPe
RIFFLE 0, AND POOL 02 (TYPICALSAPPLY)
22+50
23+00
23+50
24+00
24+50
376
372
368
364
360
656
24+75
I
1
1 TAX PARCEL: 067-084-08
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB 21707, PG 359 (TRACT 2) I END CONSTRUCTION
#2601 ROYSTON ROAD STA 24+14
SSW
RIK670.46
/
66546(F)
OUT=665.31 (6')
IES sDE I L_ — vv v v 675
+ M L SDE I I L
Q nl 669 SDE SDE—�- \ \\ \ / 15QG / / O EXIST CB
SnGR=669.31
CJ 667 — 670 —SDE �✓ / / / IL BOTTOM668 81 )
LE
LU U 665 _ \ — — — -
-_I i N 60'RCP S
LU _ SID —
V L:.1 - �fJ - - D INV=657.66
60°RCP /
1 I
I
I
1
De
O
8"G / sDF
O ¢ \
1 I —eDF�
/
F
SDE SDE" �S l�'
11—E --SDE
e�e�e
MAINTAIN POSITIVE
FLOW AT DITCH
25 LF OF 2"-12" RIP RAP 0.5' -
\ DEEP X 10' WIDE X 25' LONG
TAX PARCEL: 067-084-08
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DB 21707, PG 359 (TRACT 2)
#2601 ROYSTON ROAD
EXIST CB
GR= 669.16
BOTTOM= -658.61 (60')
o �
U Z
O
Q
/
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 7.5 15 30
e
Knowwhays below.
Call before you dig.
k o 'm o
i
0
- o
o "
in
00
O
O
W
I

}}}
SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION
( HEAD OF RIFFLE o
3 BACKFILL W/ 2.0' DEEP WELL MIXED GRADATION S
HEADER LOG, TYP. WELL GRADED MIX OF 2"-12" of OF 2'-1T RIP RAP, #57 STONE AND NATURAL
- SEE PROFILE FOR ELEVATION RIP RAP, #57 STONE AND COBBLE MATERIAL. NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO m
NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL x v
A BE USED BETWEEN BOULDERS AND BACKFILL
FLOW o GUOE RIP, Vy
° o
-IIII I I I 1 _ � Goa Go
�I III II II II III II III II III III=1I III II II II II II II II II II •I �JA
PERAPROFDEPOOL B G S$o RLL SECTION A-APOOL m Gg m B
—IIIo
N �­_ + g0
E LOW AREA, TYP RIFFLE
NAIL ALL UPSTREAM FACES OF LOGS o o Hjg (SEE PLAN/PROFILE Is
WITH NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP. �� `�C ' 0 FOR LENGTH) WRAP RIPRAP UP TOE OF
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS o g o 8��'38 8 COIR FIBER MATTING (TYP) BANK OB' TO OB'
SECTION A -A go °$�o 1%) L© e
8�0
p O
0
$Go0 a�Go$ b yN
oopoo °o °og Doo TOE OF SLOPE V
SECTION 13-113W /� z
E A G u
B o O
PLAN VIEW 'a z a
x BANKFULL e
I I I I � I I I —III— ■� N
III IIIIII IIIIIII
6 =il CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE NOTE:
Y?�-�-� PLACE LARGER MATERIAL (5"-12")
iv g - s- L AS SUBPAVEMENT. PLACE
_ 0% SLOPE — _ Not to Scale SMALLER MATERIAL (2"-6") AND
N a III � II III III NATURAL COBBLE AS PAVEMENT.
SECTION B -B z
0
0
o FLOW HEADER LOG, TYP. SEE
' - PROFILE FOR ELEVATION
O m
8
NOTES: ������ BED ~
1. PLACE FABRIC ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE MOST UPSTREAM
p E LOG SILL IN THE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE. 2' MIN. o
3. BOULDER
L`�ILLLS SHALL OVERLAP AND ANCHORTHELOG GS IF NEEDED.
LOG DIRECTLY 2' MIN. EXCAVATED POOL �
_ UPSTREAM.
4. THE LOG SILL SHALL ALL BE DESIGNED TO BE SUBMERGED OR
COVERED AT LOW FLOWS. EXCAVATED TRENCH FOR
LOG SILL CONSTRUCTION NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP.
NAIL FILTER FABRIC TO BACK OF LOG,
o� Q SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS o o m o
SECTION A -A
z
z .z
MIN. LOG DIM. 10" "
�I B EXCAVATED POOL
PER PROFILE NOTES:
1. DO NOT EXCA
L TOO CLOSE TO
OOTER LOG.
Uc BANKFULL o �°oc0 1/ BANKFULL K 4 Q K 3 AND POSTBACKF2. R P RAP CAN BETLLS OOEOTENTUPOSSIBCE LE OSFOBR TWEEAT TNE FADERS ��AR�
M a i
a EDGE OF WATER / _ i ;-' �. ` 1 EDGE OF WATER m 3 3 m 4. PaoL DEPTH SHOULD ENGINEER. TO 3 TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH.kEssy;
5
O O . MIN. LOG SIZE @�
5. MSIZE N. BOULDER BRE 2O'.
m 1 — S 5
A
It
FLOW - W P / . - LL'1 �G i FL�W BACKFILL WITH WELL -GRADED MIX UB � a
POOL OF 2"-12" RIP RAP, STONE
AND NATURAL CHANNEL MATERIAL `
, # A '�••nuCLR ..o°��
FLOW LINE
KEY INTO BANK A
EDGE OF WATER - O EDGE OF WATER MINIMUM OF 4.0'
W
- BANKFULL ° BANKFULL W U
a
17
Z BOULDERS TO BE
`NAIL ALL UPSTREAM FACES \ 1i BOULDER AND ROCK TOE t2 j 3
e FOOTER LOG 11 o BURIED AND PLACED
e OF LOGS WITH NONWOVEN PROTECTION WHERE NORMAL AT END OF LOGS
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYP. WATER MEETS THE BANKS
B KEY INTO BANK HEADER LOG04
BOULDERS TO BE BURIED AND SEE PROFILE FOR SPACING MINIMUM OF 4.0' U iLI
_ PLACED AT END OF LOGS BETWEEN LOGS, TYP. ^ a
PO L F�
3 m
O 0
UPLAN VIEW POOL EXCAVATED PER PROFILE A A
- OR DIRECTION OF ENGINEER WRAP 6" UP TOE OF SLOPE Z
O
m PLAN VIEW
=1 �
y 3 —
i LOG RIFFLE 3 LOG SILL x
Eo
Not to Scale Not to Scale
Knowwhat's below.
o Call before you dig.
In
. V
in
W
0
0
W

IN 1
■l■
TOP OF BANK
STREAM
TOP VIEW
1.5'
MI
X
O.
1 � �
SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURAL STONE
STONE (#5 OR #57) (5"-12" RIP RAP)
CROSS SECTION
z
� TOP OF BANK
in
2
STREAM BED
FRONT VIEW
4 '7 TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK DAM
Not to Scale
EXCAVATE TRENCH AND
—KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN)
----
__;-
'-SEED AND MULCH PER VEGETATION
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
EXCAVATE TRENCH ANDNEW CHANNEL
KEY INTO GROUND (6" MIN) -
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED TO EDGE OF CUT/FILL
PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH LIVE
STAKING, PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SEEDING PER
POOL KEY INTO STREAMBED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
RIFFLE (PER TYPICAL
'� CROSS-SECTION BELOW) NATURAL CHANNEL BOTTOM
SECTION (NO MATTING)
RIFFLE
COIR FIBER MATTING INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH
LIVE STAKING, PERMANENT AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING PER PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS. (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES)
BACKFILL
COIR FIBER
MATTING
RIFFLE
RIFFLE
`
NOTES:
1. IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL
PLAN
SEEDING, SOIL AMENDMENTS, AND
SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE
6" MIN. DEPTH
COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
z
THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
18" (TYP.) FLOODPLAIN/EXISTING
GROUND
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS T
-C' IN
ANCHORS ON 1'
- CENTERS IN TRENCH
MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN
TRENCH AND BACKFILLED
STREAM BED -/EXTEND MATTING BELOW TOE
OF SLOPE AND KEY INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 6"
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
MATTING IN
TRENCH
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOROVERLAP
ON V CENTERS
6" OVERLAY (MIN.)
PLAN VIEW
INSTALLATION GUIDE FOR EROSION CONTROLL MATTING
Not to Scale
1" X 1" (NOMINAL)
WOODEN STAKE
N
ANCHOR
ANCHORS ON 3' CENTERS
ANCHORS (TYP)
w
6' MAX. W/0 WIRE x: u
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER STEEL POST
SILT FENCE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SILT FENCE FABRIC a z
INSTALLED TO SECOND z
WIRE FROM TOP GRADE o
3 GRADE
IT..
= FABRIC 8" DOWN AND 4" `? - 8" MIN, COVER
FORWARD ALONG TRENCH - OVER SKIRT*
I ANCHOR SKIRT AS
r� DIRECTED BY ENGINEER* L© N
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW O
NOTES:
w
* FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES, USE No. 57 STONE 1. USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN
FOR ANCHOR WHEN SILT FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH BASIN. DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT ^ d m z
EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER
\ IN FLOW EAS OF CONCENTRATED P. �,T
//11 �� 0
1 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE 2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS w U e
V TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
Not to Scale
e
i
z
P�
�O
G 00
QJO wo ao TT y�\
2"-3" COURSE AGGREGATE,—
6" MIN. DEPTH
z
PLAN
NOTES:
1. A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL
BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE ENTERING
OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR
FROM A PUBLIC STREET.
2. STONE TO BE 2-3 INCH WASHED STONE.
�yOPp Essay,
3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A
3 sde� E
CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR
= i
FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS
OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE
=
s
PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL
STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR
AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED
4�EF CLP11��o`'
TO TRAP SEDIMENT
1
4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR
TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS MUST BE
REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
5. WHEN NECCESSARY WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED
TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTERING A
1�
PUBLIC STREET. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED,
r
IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILLIZED
WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN
APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN.
Fti
6. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACEDUNDER THE
ENTRANCE/EXIT AND SHALL BE MIRAFI 500 OR
O
EQUIVALENT.
h•I
Fr Feral
l+l
NOTE: ENTRANCE WILL BE DESIGNED FOR 54-30.
Az
d
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
a
w
7
Not to Scale00
0A
[� Fail
O ["
®
a VI
Knowwhat's below.
Call before you dig.
�.
C,
U
in
00
O
O
i�
w
I

A1}
L
IN 1
Fl■
4 X (D)
PLAN
A
j
SECTION A -A
ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR PUMP AROUND HOSE
(IF CLEAN WATER)
NOT TO SCALE
TERRAIN
STILLING BASIN
IMPERVIOUS
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN, UTILIZE A
STABILIZED OUTLET INSTEAD OF A
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IF PUMPING
CLEAN WATER. (SEE NOTES)
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
DEWATERING PUMP
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE
��� I EDGE OF FLOODPLAIN
15.0 FT. TO 20.0 FT.
FILTER FABRIC) 8" #57 STONE
STREAM
NOTE: IF SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IS PLACED ON DISTURBED SOIL THEN A STABILIZED
OUTLET/CHANNEL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL CONSIST OF A 1"-6" WELL GRADED MIX OF RIP RAP A
MINIMUM OF 1' THICKPER THE DIMENSIONS BELOW. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN
THE RIP RAP AND SOIL FOUNDATION. THE STABILIZED OUTLET WILL EXTEND FROM THE
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN TO THE BANK OF THE CHANNEL BELOW THE WORK AREA.
0
0
EXISTING
GROUND
3:1
73:1
FILTER FABRIC 3.0 FEET
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
WITH ROCK PAD
NOT TO SCALE
1 \
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL \
PUMP -AROUND
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND ENERGY DISSIPATOR FOR
HOSE/PIPE OUTLET.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS.
DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL BE
EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF
IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. PUMP AROUND AREA TO BE STABILIZED WITH MATTING AT THE END OF EACH
WORK DAY. THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET
ONLY SHOW THE UPPER AND LOWER EXTENT OF WORK FOR EACH STREAM
SEGMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE
LOCATION OF THE IMPERVIOUS DIKE(S) FOR EACH DAYS WORK. ALL
GRADING MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF THE DAY.
8. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND OUTLET CHANNEL AND THEN
BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA PER THE PLANS AND SPECS.
NOTES
1) ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ONLY DRY OR ISOLATED
SECTIONS OF CHANNEL.
2) IMPERVIOUS DIKES ARE TO BE USED TO ISOLATE WORK FROM
STREAM FLOW.
3) GRADED STREAM BANKS SHALL BE STABILIZED, WITH MATTING,
PRIOR TO PREDICTED RAIN FALL EVENTS, UNLESS ALL RAIN
EVENT FLOW CAN BE PUMPED AROUND FOR PREDICTED EVENT.
4) MAINTENANCE OF STREAM FLOW OPERATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING, DIVERSION PIPES, PUMPS AND HOSES.
5) PUMPS AND HOSES SHALL BE OF SUFFICICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER
THE WORK AREA.
WORK AREA
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
NOT TO SCALE
15.
KnowwhaPs below.
Call before you dig.
o
r
x o
o o 0
m V
in
00
W
I

PROTECT CURB AND SIDEWALK AND REPAIR/REPLACE AS NECESSARY
PROTECT CURB AND SIDEWALK AND REPAIR/REPLACE AS NECESSARY I, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOTE: .I
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
/ o
TOTAL DISTURBED
NORTH ��
STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREA A - 1 8 ACRES
/ O R
_ ROYSTON - E
ROAD
NORTHING: 545813.19
1701
FASTING1436783.46 50 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 0GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
NOG 545806.02 25 50 100 - ---_-- MB 6,PG 707 EAS
G: 1437661.43/k
60
E
1625 LF �AFETY FENCE
12' WIDE HAULIROAD (TYP) 1 / �\ \+•� �© e
"
o
m _ I
0
44
^w I
z 7 U
ID
x I
a
o Y
-
w
ACCESS PLAN
U
I °
z
,
o
'ROYSTON ROAD
z
— — / 50' PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY i
MB 6, PG 707 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50 100
CARO
es��v"'s
SHRUB SPECIES ONLY IN ZONES B
AND C WITHIN DUKE EASEMENT
I
° E
I
/� I I° /° r O O O 0000000000 111���111 � y
zN F
/
E
PLANTING PLAN.00
00
O
O
W
I

in
00
O
O
W
I

Appendix IV - Upstream Bed Stabilization Area Repair Plans /
Initial Stabilization Plans

ma
684
688 688
684 684
680 680
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700
696 696
692 692
688 688
684 684-
680 680
676 67620
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
PR 41• REDI-ROCK SOLID WALL
CROSS
OR EQUIVALET. SETBACK V TYP.
DESCRIPTION
VANE, TYP,
SEE PLAN
1Y BEHIND BLOCKS, TYP.
PR. GRADE
NON -WOVEN GEATEXDLE FABRIC
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
20
CHANNEL BED
BED, TYP.
-
0% SLOPE, TYP.
SECTION AT CHANNEL
EX GRAD
EX GRADE
POOL CONTROL POINT ELEVATTGN
N'3
4
FT.
SANKFULL WIDTH
10
4
FT.
VANE ARM L.E'.NGTH
XT
1.5
SCALE
FLOODPLAIN BILL LENGTH
XB
1" = 20' (H)
FT.
Ra
I"= 4'(V)
6..
IN.
688 688
684 684
680 680
r4*1
PER, GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 rI
684
684--
680--
L
680 676-20
PR GRAD^
676 676 676 676 Ex. GRADE
0+00 0+500+59 0+00 0+500+59 700
PROFILE: CHANNEL 1 PROFILE: CHANNEL 2 sss
692
688
PR. 41" WIDE REDI-ROCK NON -REINFORCED SOLID WALL, TYP. 664
PR. 1.5:1 SLOPE AND INSTALL 60 SY OF
COIR MATTING EC -7Y OR EQUIVALENT 660
TOP OF WALL 686.00 PR. FLOODPLAIN. FILL WITH EX. SALVAGED STONE FROM
TOP OF WALL 684.50 EX, MATTRESSES AND #57 STONE. FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILS 676 -10 0
TOP OF WALL 6839 TOP OF DITCH PR. CLASS A & B RIPRAP (MIXED 50/50).
TOP OF WALL 6 1.50 , - x� FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILSPER ,
w^-
u
a :�T�•� <✓ ) `: / �`y. `�.4y DE
t i,..'7 �1 `3.�. �X
x�AO
t J
y ",C ` _ , EX
� 9 r� -.�-�- ,. ' GRE
0+50
o �' 70 -Pr. Chi
REMOVE BERM AND PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM
TOP OF WALLO ROYSTON RD T P O� is WSALDL
'96
0+ CH.85
NN 880.55 681. 681.751 $83 5 _ 685.0 O
NVERT-s�o. 1 5 -_ _ ^�� 66+.75 m 692
61.25 80.5 ' c '1 0+58.83 688 _
INV RT -68 48
4
0+00 (J�HA"EL 2) 0 684
t f
660
PR.1301F METAL
a17 r 5 �. .� 676
684.75 o
684.00
CROSS SECTIONS
SCALE
TOP p\F WALL 681.50 --___ PR 1.5:1 SLOPE AND INSTALL 75 SY OF 1" = 10 i V
TOP OF WALL 683.00 COIR MATTING EC -7Y OR EQUIVALENT ( )
TOP OF WALL 684.50 NOTES:
TOP OF WALL QZ .00 1. REMOVE EX, MATTRESSES AND SALVAGE STONE (NOT SHOWN).
2. REMOVE EX. MATTING (NOT SHOWN.)
♦ �" __'3. SEED -AND MULCH COIR MATTING.
PLAN
0 10 20
5 15
SCALE: I"=10'
-10
0+04
C
10
BANKFULL{SEE
ALL
FAMR31�.
Fwi�ll
Lie
RIGHT VANE AF1M
'CONTROL POINT
ON ion NOTES B)
POOL1
+(NOT USED)!{
l
Xi • GRADE VANEINVERT
CONTROL PONT
ELEVATION
OD. LBP(VANSARM
PeacepTODNTRO.PONT
"VATJON (EmNCT81B
PHOTO: CROSS VANE PLAN VIEW
,.JOLT USED)
YA - POO LGONRROL
PONT!EK>N BANKFULLWIUTH
(NOT USED) D)
xa F1
TOE OF BANK �
S, T{7Ri18 Xd X14
PLAN VIEW
VANE ARM SECTION A - A
'THIS FIGURE IS ONLLY MEANTTO DEFINE THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE TTY OF CHARLOTTE TO BE INCLUDED INA DETAIL FOR THIS TYPE
OF TECHNIQUE.
'THIS FIGURE 18 NOT MEANT TO IRF_PRESENT A STANDARD DESIGN METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH. NOT TO SCALE
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOULDER CROSS VANE 1 oFs
1 STORM WATER SERVICES
1 GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
700
696
692
688
684
680
10 676
700
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700--
696 696--
692 692--
688 688
684 684--
680 680--
676 676
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700
696 696
692 692
688 688
684 684-
680 680
676 67620
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
PR 41• REDI-ROCK SOLID WALL
PR. GRADE
OR EQUIVALET. SETBACK V TYP.
DESCRIPTION
CROSS
SEE PLAN
1Y BEHIND BLOCKS, TYP.
VANE, TYP.
NON -WOVEN GEATEXDLE FABRIC
SEE PLAN
CHANNEL
20
CHANNEL BED
BED TYP
-
0% SLOPE, TYP.
SECTION AT CHANNEL
(NOT USED)
EX GRADE
POOL CONTROL POINT ELEVATTGN
N'3
4
FT.
SANKFULL WIDTH
10
4
FT.
VANE ARM L.E'.NGTH
XT
1.5
/ I
FLOODPLAIN BILL LENGTH
XB
7
FT.
Ra
SCALE
6..
IN.
050 OF COARSE BACKFILL
XTD
20°
I ].
VANE ARM ANI WITH STRIEAM BANK
u
r4*1
PER, GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 rI
684
684--
680--
L
680 676-20
PR GRAD^
676 676 676 676 Ex. GRADE
0+00 0+500+59 0+00 0+500+59 700
PROFILE: CHANNEL 1 PROFILE: CHANNEL 2 sss
692
688
PR. 41" WIDE REDI-ROCK NON -REINFORCED SOLID WALL, TYP. 664
PR. 1.5:1 SLOPE AND INSTALL 60 SY OF
COIR MATTING EC -7Y OR EQUIVALENT 660
TOP OF WALL 686.00 PR. FLOODPLAIN. FILL WITH EX. SALVAGED STONE FROM
TOP OF WALL 684.50 EX, MATTRESSES AND #57 STONE. FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILS 676 -10 0
TOP OF WALL 6839 TOP OF DITCH PR. CLASS A & B RIPRAP (MIXED 50/50).
TOP OF WALL 6 1.50 , - x� FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILSPER ,
w^-
u
a :�T�•� <✓ ) `: / �`y. `�.4y DE
t i,..'7 �1 `3.�. �X
x�AO
t J
y ",C ` _ , EX
� 9 r� -.�-�- ,. ' GRE
0+50
o �' 70 -Pr. Chi
REMOVE BERM AND PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM
TOP OF WALLO ROYSTON RD T P O� is WSALDL
'96
0+ CH.85
NN 880.55 681. 681.751 $83 5 _ 685.0 O
NVERT-s�o. 1 5 -_ _ ^�� 66+.75 m 692
61.25 80.5 ' c '1 0+58.83 688 _
INV RT -68 48
4
0+00 (J�HA"EL 2) 0 684
t f
660
PR.1301F METAL
a17 r 5 �. .� 676
684.75 o
684.00
CROSS SECTIONS
SCALE
TOP p\F WALL 681.50 --___ PR 1.5:1 SLOPE AND INSTALL 75 SY OF 1" = 10 i V
TOP OF WALL 683.00 COIR MATTING EC -7Y OR EQUIVALENT ( )
TOP OF WALL 684.50 NOTES:
TOP OF WALL QZ .00 1. REMOVE EX, MATTRESSES AND SALVAGE STONE (NOT SHOWN).
2. REMOVE EX. MATTING (NOT SHOWN.)
♦ �" __'3. SEED -AND MULCH COIR MATTING.
PLAN
0 10 20
5 15
SCALE: I"=10'
-10
0+04
C
10
BANKFULL{SEE
ALL
FAMR31�.
Fwi�ll
Lie
RIGHT VANE AF1M
'CONTROL POINT
ON ion NOTES B)
POOL1
+(NOT USED)!{
l
Xi • GRADE VANEINVERT
CONTROL PONT
ELEVATION
OD. LBP(VANSARM
PeacepTODNTRO.PONT
"VATJON (EmNCT81B
PHOTO: CROSS VANE PLAN VIEW
,.JOLT USED)
YA - POO LGONRROL
PONT!EK>N BANKFULLWIUTH
(NOT USED) D)
xa F1
TOE OF BANK �
S, T{7Ri18 Xd X14
PLAN VIEW
VANE ARM SECTION A - A
'THIS FIGURE IS ONLLY MEANTTO DEFINE THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE TTY OF CHARLOTTE TO BE INCLUDED INA DETAIL FOR THIS TYPE
OF TECHNIQUE.
'THIS FIGURE 18 NOT MEANT TO IRF_PRESENT A STANDARD DESIGN METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH. NOT TO SCALE
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOULDER CROSS VANE 1 oFs
1 STORM WATER SERVICES
1 GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
700
696
692
688
684
680
10 676
700
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700--
696 696--
692 692--
688 688
684 684--
680 680--
676 676
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700
696 696
692 692
688 688
684 684-
680 680
676 67620
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
PR 41• REDI-ROCK SOLID WALL
1.5:1 SLOPE MAX
OR EQUIVALET. SETBACK V TYP.
DESCRIPTION
\
SEE PLAN
1Y BEHIND BLOCKS, TYP.
NON -WOVEN GEATEXDLE FABRIC
SEE PLAN
' 4• PERFORATED SOCK DRAIN, TYP.
20
PR GRADE
EX. GRADE
70C
696
692
688
684
68C
676
-10 0
{SEE NOTES) BANKFUII
(41111,101
^'•�-.ti, ", d-RQRXE!FT GR AE
ARMINTERCEPT CONTAMINANT
COARSE ELEVATION
BACKFILL
VARIED
FLOW _
"a...ir,. N
OTE
40N
12 ESE
X
KES d- X4. PODLOONEROL(NOT USED)
®. -4
POINT IHUEAMN
✓' r';. -a. '� ,._X19 SBE NCAER; �
a°L r �-0C\S. POOL KIS
PROFILE VIEW
-10 0
700
696
692
688
684
680
10 676
FR GRADE
EX. GRADE
7C
69
69
68
68
68
67., -10
0+20
-10
700
CHANNEL BOTTOM
PR. GRADE
EX. GRADE
700 700
696 696
692 692
688 688
684 684-
680 680
676 67620
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
PR 41• REDI-ROCK SOLID WALL
1.5:1 SLOPE MAX
OR EQUIVALET. SETBACK V TYP.
DESCRIPTION
07 STONE EXTEND AT LEAST
SEE PLAN
1Y BEHIND BLOCKS, TYP.
NON -WOVEN GEATEXDLE FABRIC
SEE PLAN
' 4• PERFORATED SOCK DRAIN, TYP.
-
12• SELECT MATERIAL STONE
SEE PLAN
LEVELING PAD, TYP.
TYPICAL
SECTION AT CHANNEL
(NOT USED)
FT. (NAND)
POOL CONTROL POINT ELEVATTGN
N'3
4
FT.
SANKFULL WIDTH
10
{SEE NOTES) BANKFUII
(41111,101
^'•�-.ti, ", d-RQRXE!FT GR AE
ARMINTERCEPT CONTAMINANT
COARSE ELEVATION
BACKFILL
VARIED
FLOW _
"a...ir,. N
OTE
40N
12 ESE
X
KES d- X4. PODLOONEROL(NOT USED)
®. -4
POINT IHUEAMN
✓' r';. -a. '� ,._X19 SBE NCAER; �
a°L r �-0C\S. POOL KIS
PROFILE VIEW
-10 0
700
696
692
688
684
680
10 676
FR GRADE
EX. GRADE
7C
69
69
68
68
68
67., -10
0+20
-10
700
CHANNEL BOTTOM
ANDFOOTERBOULDERB.
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
PR 41• REDI-ROCK SOLID WALL
1.5:1 SLOPE MAX
OR EQUIVALET. SETBACK V TYP.
DESCRIPTION
07 STONE EXTEND AT LEAST
SEE PLAN
1Y BEHIND BLOCKS, TYP.
NON -WOVEN GEATEXDLE FABRIC
SEE PLAN
' 4• PERFORATED SOCK DRAIN, TYP.
-
12• SELECT MATERIAL STONE
SEE PLAN
LEVELING PAD, TYP.
TYPICAL
SECTION AT CHANNEL
SCALE
1"=10'
PHOTO: CROSS VANE PROFILE VIEW
YR
CROSS SECTION B-8'
THIS FIGURE IS ONLY MEANT TO DEFINE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE TO BE INCLUDED INA DETAIL FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE.
THIS FIGURE IS NOT MEANT TO REPRESENT A STANDARD !DESIGN METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH. NOT TO SCA
CI ARLOTTE-MECKLENIBURG BOULDER CROSS VANE 20Fs
STORM 'WATE'R SERVICES
Rm-laul CBNERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION
EU
700
696
692
688
684
680
10 676
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MANUAL (OLDS), AND NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS, LATEST EDITIONS.
2. ALL STAGING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING, AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE
RIGHT OF WAY, PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT.
3. OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN THE EASEMENT OR R -O -W, SUCH AS MAILBOXES, PLANTERS, FENCES, OR
LANDSCAPE FEATURES, SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN NECESSARY AND REPLACED IN KIND.
4. UTILITIES SHOWN WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ARE BASED ON A LIMITED SURVEY, GIS RECORDS,
HISTORICAL MAPPING, AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO
BE AWARE OF UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT VICINITY PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
5. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE, RAKED,
SEEDED AND MULCHED.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING:
• 401/404 JURISDICTIONAL AREA(S) HAVE BEEN PERMITTED UNDER CHARLOTTE STORM WATER
SERVICES RGP#163/GC#4100, OR APPLICABLE PERMIT DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
• BY CITY ORDINANCE, THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER POLLUTANTS TO THE STORM WATER
SYSTEM OR WATER BODIES IS PROHIBITED.
LEGEND
EXISTING STORM PIPE SALVAGED STONE &#57 STONE.
_J I FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILS
BOULDER CROSS VANE x {xa �.� �. COIR MATTING
CLASS A & B RIPRAP PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK
(MIXED 50/50). FILL VOIDS 1a .); y4:
WITH NATIVE SOILS
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
CALL INC 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
1-800-832-4949
AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE
1, ABOULDER ORCa'88 VANES AGRADE CONTROL IN•SIREAMI STRUCTURETHATDVMOT68MAM FLOW
ANDFOOTERBOULDERB.
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
VAIMA®LB
VALRS
TYPICAL UNIT
DESCRIPTION
Til
SEE PLAN
91jeghanl
b
0r
SEE PLAN
FT. (NAND)
-
PROJECT SITE
SEE PLAN
FT, (NAVD)
RIGHT VANE ARM INTERCEPT CONTROL POINT ELEVATION
X4
(NOT USED)
FT. (NAND)
POOL CONTROL POINT ELEVATTGN
N'3
4
FT.
SANKFULL WIDTH
XB
4
FT.
VANE ARM L.E'.NGTH
XT
1.5
FT.
FLOODPLAIN BILL LENGTH
XB
7
FT.
Ra
XG
6..
IN.
050 OF COARSE BACKFILL
XTD
20°
I ].
VANE ARM ANI WITH STRIEAM BANK
u
SEE PIAN
IN. OR Fr.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TOP OF BANK (BANKFULU AND VANE
ARM INTERCEPT POINT
X12
0
i
O!
i I➢
C.'
V
�
�
X14
1.5 FI
Q
LA
XIS
J
IN. OR FT.
q
p.
(NOT USED)
FT.
VICINITY MAP
X1'7
5
N.T.S.
HEADER SOLLCEIR 80 BACK
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MANUAL (OLDS), AND NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS, LATEST EDITIONS.
2. ALL STAGING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING, AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE
RIGHT OF WAY, PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT.
3. OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN THE EASEMENT OR R -O -W, SUCH AS MAILBOXES, PLANTERS, FENCES, OR
LANDSCAPE FEATURES, SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN NECESSARY AND REPLACED IN KIND.
4. UTILITIES SHOWN WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ARE BASED ON A LIMITED SURVEY, GIS RECORDS,
HISTORICAL MAPPING, AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO
BE AWARE OF UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT VICINITY PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
5. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE, RAKED,
SEEDED AND MULCHED.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING:
• 401/404 JURISDICTIONAL AREA(S) HAVE BEEN PERMITTED UNDER CHARLOTTE STORM WATER
SERVICES RGP#163/GC#4100, OR APPLICABLE PERMIT DOCUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
• BY CITY ORDINANCE, THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER POLLUTANTS TO THE STORM WATER
SYSTEM OR WATER BODIES IS PROHIBITED.
LEGEND
EXISTING STORM PIPE SALVAGED STONE &#57 STONE.
_J I FILL VOIDS WITH NATIVE SOILS
BOULDER CROSS VANE x {xa �.� �. COIR MATTING
CLASS A & B RIPRAP PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK
(MIXED 50/50). FILL VOIDS 1a .); y4:
WITH NATIVE SOILS
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
CALL INC 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
1-800-832-4949
AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE
1, ABOULDER ORCa'88 VANES AGRADE CONTROL IN•SIREAMI STRUCTURETHATDVMOT68MAM FLOW
AWAY FROM THE STREAM BANKS AND IN TOWAROTHECENTER OFTHECHANNEL
2. ELEVATION CONTROL POINTE SMALLER DEMISHATBDATTNE UPSTREAM [WERT (CENTER) OF THE
DROSS VANE70 ESTABLISH PART OF THE PROPELS. PODLELEVATODN CONTROL PMT80R EXCAVATION
TO A SPECIFIED MA1DMUM FOOL DEPTH SHALL BE DESIGNATED TO ESTASUBH THE REWNNG PROPILL
BURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED T45BTABLISHA000RATE CRD86 VANE
NST'ALLATKTN A'THIIN THE TOLERANCE SPEDIFE DDY THE
S. THEVANS ARM SHALL INTERCEPT THE STREAM BANK AT AWEIGHTEQUALTO BETWEEN YABANKFULL
STAGEAHOSANKFUU.STAGE, ELEVATION OONTROLPOMTBMAYMEBTAKSMMATTHELEFTAND
RIGHT STREAM GMrJVANE ARM INTERCEPT POINTE. Tt1E'6A*AAMWrMWEPTLOCATMMAYEE
OTH ERATBE CESCRISED BY ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SANKFULLSTAGEOR BYTHE LENGTHANDSLOPE CF
THE VANE ARM, WNKFULL IS NOT NECESSARILY THE TCP OF'IHESIAEPAI PM ILCPL
4. IF PLANS OESIGNATE THE LRE OF MULTIPLE BOULDER ORON VAN93, A TABLEOF ALAI
LOCATIONS AND CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHALL BEPWMDED IN THIS DETAJLOR PROVIDED
ELSEWHERE IN THE PLANA AND REFERENOEO HERRN,
S. TYPICAL RIFFLE ANID POOL CROSS SECTIONS SHALL BE IPRCVJDED ELBEIWEREINTHE PLANSTO
ESTABLISH THE DELEISIONS OF THE CHANNEL GRADERS NTO WHSCH THE ECULCERCROSS VAMMAM
TO BE INSTALLED.
S. THE GROSS VANE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH FLATBIDED BOULDERS OF ABLE EENGTH WIDTH,
AND DEPTH) RECAS 4IFEOSYTHHOEBI
7. FILTER FABRIC OF ATYPE AND SIZE SPECIFIED BYTHE DSUMNERSRALLBE UBEDTOSEALTHEGAPS
BETWEEN THE BOULDERS AND UNDER THE COARSE BACKFEA MATERIALTHERESHALLSE NO FILTER
FAERIC VISIBLE IN THE FINISHED WORK; EDGES SHALL 09 FOLDED, TUS`990, OR TRSRMIEDAE NEEDED.
S. GDAROSSAGKFILLOF THE BOULDER CROSS VANE SHALL BE OFATYPE, 81iEAND GRADATION AS
SPECIFIED BY THIS DESIGNER. COARSE BACKFILLEHALL SE PLACED TO ATHICKNESS EQUAL TO THE
DEPTH OF THS HEADER AND FOOTER BCULDERG AND BHWLL EXTWD OUT FROM TIE VANEARMSTO THE
STREAM BANK AND UPSTREAM A CNITANCEAMIPEO BY THE DEWS,
S. THEINVERTRMANTHENTHEOTHER VME ARM.NEBHAU.BECONSRAAGHDRRBT,NBTRU'EDBY
DINE VANE MRM,®NDTHEN THE OTHER VANE .ARM. THE FLCOOPLAN BLLSILHALL�COHBTRUCTED
LAST.
10. BOULDER CROSS VANE SHALL EE BUILTTYPICALLYAE FOLLOW&
A. OYER4EXCAVATE STREAM SED TO A DEPTH EQUAL 'TDTHETOTALTHM,RMM OF THEHEADER
ANDFOOTERBOULDERB.
OM RMDNB (VALUE! TD BB PROMEat BY Dlalamm
VAIMA®LB
VALRS
TYPICAL UNIT
DESCRIPTION
Til
SEE PLAN
FT- 04AVO)
CROSS VANE INVERT CONTROL IPCINT ELEVATION
X'L
SEE PLAN
FT. (NAND)
LEFT VANE ARM INTERCEPT CONTROL POINT ELEVA71ON
XE
SEE PLAN
FT, (NAVD)
RIGHT VANE ARM INTERCEPT CONTROL POINT ELEVATION
X4
(NOT USED)
FT. (NAND)
POOL CONTROL POINT ELEVATTGN
N'3
4
FT.
SANKFULL WIDTH
XB
4
FT.
VANE ARM L.E'.NGTH
XT
1.5
FT.
FLOODPLAIN BILL LENGTH
XB
7
FT.
LENGTH OF COARSE SACKFILL
XG
6..
IN.
050 OF COARSE BACKFILL
XTD
20°
DEGREES
VANE ARM ANI WITH STRIEAM BANK
MI
SEE PIAN
IN. OR Fr.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TOP OF BANK (BANKFULU AND VANE
ARM INTERCEPT POINT
X12
0
PERCENT
VANE ARM SLOPE
X19
3 F
IN, OR FT.
-_--
SOULDERLENGTH
X14
1.5 FI
IN. OR FT.
BOULDER VAOTH
XIS
1.5 FI
IN. OR FT.
BOULDER THICKNESS
X18
(NOT USED)
FT.
MAXIMUM POOL DEPTH
X1'7
5
IN.
HEADER SOLLCEIR 80 BACK
AWAY FROM THE STREAM BANKS AND IN TOWAROTHECENTER OFTHECHANNEL
2. ELEVATION CONTROL POINTE SMALLER DEMISHATBDATTNE UPSTREAM [WERT (CENTER) OF THE
DROSS VANE70 ESTABLISH PART OF THE PROPELS. PODLELEVATODN CONTROL PMT80R EXCAVATION
TO A SPECIFIED MA1DMUM FOOL DEPTH SHALL BE DESIGNATED TO ESTASUBH THE REWNNG PROPILL
BURVEY OF CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED T45BTABLISHA000RATE CRD86 VANE
NST'ALLATKTN A'THIIN THE TOLERANCE SPEDIFE DDY THE
S. THEVANS ARM SHALL INTERCEPT THE STREAM BANK AT AWEIGHTEQUALTO BETWEEN YABANKFULL
STAGEAHOSANKFUU.STAGE, ELEVATION OONTROLPOMTBMAYMEBTAKSMMATTHELEFTAND
RIGHT STREAM GMrJVANE ARM INTERCEPT POINTE. Tt1E'6A*AAMWrMWEPTLOCATMMAYEE
OTH ERATBE CESCRISED BY ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SANKFULLSTAGEOR BYTHE LENGTHANDSLOPE CF
THE VANE ARM, WNKFULL IS NOT NECESSARILY THE TCP OF'IHESIAEPAI PM ILCPL
4. IF PLANS OESIGNATE THE LRE OF MULTIPLE BOULDER ORON VAN93, A TABLEOF ALAI
LOCATIONS AND CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHALL BEPWMDED IN THIS DETAJLOR PROVIDED
ELSEWHERE IN THE PLANA AND REFERENOEO HERRN,
S. TYPICAL RIFFLE ANID POOL CROSS SECTIONS SHALL BE IPRCVJDED ELBEIWEREINTHE PLANSTO
ESTABLISH THE DELEISIONS OF THE CHANNEL GRADERS NTO WHSCH THE ECULCERCROSS VAMMAM
TO BE INSTALLED.
S. THE GROSS VANE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH FLATBIDED BOULDERS OF ABLE EENGTH WIDTH,
AND DEPTH) RECAS 4IFEOSYTHHOEBI
7. FILTER FABRIC OF ATYPE AND SIZE SPECIFIED BYTHE DSUMNERSRALLBE UBEDTOSEALTHEGAPS
BETWEEN THE BOULDERS AND UNDER THE COARSE BACKFEA MATERIALTHERESHALLSE NO FILTER
FAERIC VISIBLE IN THE FINISHED WORK; EDGES SHALL 09 FOLDED, TUS`990, OR TRSRMIEDAE NEEDED.
S. GDAROSSAGKFILLOF THE BOULDER CROSS VANE SHALL BE OFATYPE, 81iEAND GRADATION AS
SPECIFIED BY THIS DESIGNER. COARSE BACKFILLEHALL SE PLACED TO ATHICKNESS EQUAL TO THE
DEPTH OF THS HEADER AND FOOTER BCULDERG AND BHWLL EXTWD OUT FROM TIE VANEARMSTO THE
STREAM BANK AND UPSTREAM A CNITANCEAMIPEO BY THE DEWS,
S. THEINVERTRMANTHENTHEOTHER VME ARM.NEBHAU.BECONSRAAGHDRRBT,NBTRU'EDBY
DINE VANE MRM,®NDTHEN THE OTHER VANE .ARM. THE FLCOOPLAN BLLSILHALL�COHBTRUCTED
LAST.
10. BOULDER CROSS VANE SHALL EE BUILTTYPICALLYAE FOLLOW&
A. OYER4EXCAVATE STREAM SED TO A DEPTH EQUAL 'TDTHETOTALTHM,RMM OF THEHEADER
z z DO F
nQ �¢ of wQ
10 ❑ U O
[S] +4
�NtCAROti�'�,
,.roQ�Ftb • O
04192
8A'77,J o
MO
rA
W
• Icy f
l
O
i
IRV
Gil 1�-I
N _4�
00 O
N
�/�
V1
W
ILL A
ILL
romil
� � 1
ANDFOOTERBOULDERB.
B. PLACE FOOTER BOULDERS, THERE SHALL BE NO DAPS BER EEN BOULDERS.
0. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC.
ryry
ID. PLACE COURSE BACKFILL SEHNDTHE FOOTER SCULDERB.
L
IS. INSTALL 11 EAGER BOULDERS ON TOP OF AND SET SLIGHTLY BACK FROM THEFODTERBOULDERS
N
M
(SUCH THATFART OF THE HEADER BOULDER 18 RiNTMON THEC EA+MSflLL), HEADER
IF
BOULDER88HALLSPAN THE SEAMS OF THE FOOTER BOULDER& THERE SHALL BE NOGAFS
BETWEEN BOULDERS. THE SLOPE OF THE VANS ARM IS MEASURSO ALONOTHE VANEARM WHCH
IS INSTAUAID AT AN ANGLE TOTHE 8TREAM SANXAW PROFILE
IF. PLACE COARSE BACKFILL BEHIND HEADER BOULDERS NGLI+d#G THAT ANY VCM BETWEEN THE
�Z
BOULDEPRBAREPILLO.
It. IF ANY EROSION CONTROL MATTING IB SPECIFIED FOR USE N THE VICINITY OFH
T EVANEAED
W
INTERCEPT 1101411 AND FLOODPLAIN SILLS ALL MATTING EOGEB SHALL NEATLYSECURED AROUND
THE BOULDERS.
THIS FIGURE IS ONLY MEANT TO DEFINE THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE TO BE INCLUDED IN A DETAIL FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE.
THIS FIGURE IS NOT MEANT TO REPRESENT A STANDARD DESIGN !METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH. NOT TO SCALE
a
�o
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENEURG
ave
BOULDER CROSS VANE
sof s
STORM WATER SERVICES
Z
0°°��
GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS
DRAFT - NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTIC3N
s: Ural
30
z z DO F
nQ �¢ of wQ
10 ❑ U O
[S] +4
�NtCAROti�'�,
,.roQ�Ftb • O
04192
8A'77,J o
MO
rA
W
• Icy f
l
O
i
IRV
Gil 1�-I
N _4�
00 O
N
�/�
V1
W
ILL A
ILL
romil
� � 1
N
N
N
ryry
pmp
L
N
M
b
IF
R
LO
2
^ w
f
g
�Z
OZ
W
A
u
a
�o
ave
U
1
awi
Z
0°°��
s: Ural
30
U O
0�U'OM
w OWING
z z DO F
nQ �¢ of wQ
10 ❑ U O
[S] +4
�NtCAROti�'�,
,.roQ�Ftb • O
04192
8A'77,J o
MO
rA
W
• Icy f
l
O
i
IRV
Gil 1�-I
N _4�
00 O
N
�/�
V1
W
ILL A
ILL
romil
� � 1

69:
681
KEY TO
EXISTING
GRADE
682
PR. RENO -
MATTRESSES
PR. GEOTEXTILE -
FILTER FABRIC
68(
67(
674
2+11 2+00 1+50
PROFILE: STRUCTURE 4 TO 1 -PR PIPE 1
PR. DBL CATCH BASIN.
4
EX. BRICK HEADWALL
TO BE REMOVED
o �m
GROOVE PIPE
jo-HBAS !N
WITH HEADWALL
ow3�
8oT
AT ENTRANCE
z's o 0
PR. DBL CATCH BASIN.
700
BASIN WITH DBL CATCH
SEE JUNCTION BOX ON
rc f > >
- -
jo-HBAS !N
SHEET 2 OF 2
3
RELOCATE EX.
RELOCATE EX.
EX. CATCH BASIN
Toll
$ a
8" WATER MAIN
T
BOX TO BE REMOVED
E%. CONCRETE JUNCTIONRD
\
DO
_
BOX TO BE REMOVED
n
1
61
KEY TG -
EXISTING
GRADE
W
PR. RENO -
MATTRESSES
PR. GEOTEXTILE -
FILTER FABRIC
61
6.
67
2+13 2+00 1+50
PROFILE: STRUCTURE 4 TO 1 -PR PIPE 2
4
W ��m
EX. BRICK HEADWALL n o 3
TO BE REMOVED + i O o 0
GROOVE PIPE 20o>
WITH HEADWALL
392
388
EX. ENDWALL
TO REMAIN
384
80
676
X. 48" RCP TO REMAIN
674
1+00 0+50 0+00
REPLACE SINGLE CATCH
700
BASIN WITH DBL CATCH
PR. GRADE, SLOPE
rc f > >
- -
jo-HBAS !N
TO CATCH BASIN
3
RELOCATE EX.
VIN- III I EX ENDWALC�
IINV2\1 (WEg1j7R ~ TOREMAIN
6" WATER MAIN
$ a
EX. CONCRETE JUNCTION
ar
\
BOX TO BE REMOVED
O 7 Z 0
\
DO
_
Xomoio.vi
I
7
. CATCH BABI
■
1
FLOWABLE FILL
TG PIPING
PROPOSED PROPOSED
itan
mmi
rvio/i roim/
SPRING LINE
RCP RCP
1 MILLING AND
)'
EX. a72LF OF 48 HDPE
TO BE RE IOVED EX. t27LF OF 48' FOP
TO BE REMOVED
_
SCALE ------- -f- EX. i42 LF OF 48' RCP
-
1" = 20' (H) TO BE LINED CIPP
---
1" = 4' V EX. 48" ROTO REMAIN
61
KEY TG -
EXISTING
GRADE
W
PR. RENO -
MATTRESSES
PR. GEOTEXTILE -
FILTER FABRIC
61
6.
67
2+13 2+00 1+50
PROFILE: STRUCTURE 4 TO 1 -PR PIPE 2
4
W ��m
EX. BRICK HEADWALL n o 3
TO BE REMOVED + i O o 0
GROOVE PIPE 20o>
WITH HEADWALL
392
388
EX. ENDWALL
TO REMAIN
384
80
676
X. 48" RCP TO REMAIN
674
1+00 0+50 0+00
REPLACE SINGLE CATCH
700
BASIN WITH DBL CATCH
O G
BASIN. SEE JUNCTION BOX
jo-HBAS !N
ON SHEET 2 OF 2
3
RELOCATE EX.
VIN- III I EX ENDWALC�
IINV2\1 (WEg1j7R ~ TOREMAIN
6" WATER MAIN
$ a
EX. CONCRETE JUNCTION
ar
\
BOX TO BE REMOVED
O 7 Z 0
PR. GRADE, SLOPE
DO
1
1+00
OO _
O/
CONSTRUCTION STAGING 7
_ AREA WITHIN RAW EX. 142LF OF 48" RCP TO BE LINED (CI .
PP
u��T=se5a CIPP TO BE DESIGNED TO ASTM F1216
�6 S 5555 „ y FOR FULLY DETERIORATED PIPE.
55 e S
RIDGEMONT BOULEVARD SS -TOLE VALLEY CURB-
PR. BOLE TREE (50' PUBLIC R/W-NOT OPEN) REPLACEMENT
PROTECTION FENCE PR. 54LF TREE RELOCATE 38LF OF
PROTECTION FENCE e' CIP WATER MAIN
ti EX. t53LF OF 48' RCP
I REPLACE BRIC HEADWALL WITH " TO BE REMOVED
NCDOT 838.01 CONC. HEADWALL
o IO BAL SAFETY RAIL CLDS 50.04 zO Ax 5' OA
OE
I PR. INV. IN=680.47 f O C
REMOVE EX RIP RAP AS
INECESSARYFORCONSTRUCTION 8
y` E ,95 LF 48•�P'PIPE'� F
0+50
�B
Oi
O_
EX. ENDWALL
TO REMAIN
84
80
RCP
MAIN
76
74
0+00
/4 I/ / I \ \30-
700
OAK\
O G
mll
/ \ o�Bloeai
jo-HBAS !N
cO-Y
NECKIEN7pJ ory Ron \
III
PO�r
28°i1 R D i�
13
y QE
VIN- III I EX ENDWALC�
IINV2\1 (WEg1j7R ~ TOREMAIN
NV OUT -55.4. D( (EAST))ss
680
II
ar
\
' a , zirncivnviiooioroiraoiiiovronioroniomi
�
\\
i
Xomoio.vi
I
NX
�y
. CATCH BABI
■
PAVEMENT
FLOWABLE FILL
TG PIPING
PROPOSED PROPOSED
itan
mmi
rvio/i roim/
SPRING LINE
RCP RCP
1 MILLING AND
)'
O
NOTES: PIPE JOINT
RESURFACING (MIN)
1. ALL O-RING PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH ATYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FILTRATION
_I
FABRIC.
2. GEOTEXTILE WRAP SHALL BE SECURED WITH TAPE, STRING, OR OTHER FASTENING
METHOD PRIOR TO BACKFILL BEING PLACED,
STORM PIPING TRENCH DETAIL
PIPE JOINT
N. T. S.
WRAPPING DETAIL
PROPOSED 1j"
SURFACE COURSE
1+00
OO _
O/
CONSTRUCTION STAGING 7
_ AREA WITHIN RAW EX. 142LF OF 48" RCP TO BE LINED (CI .
PP
u��T=se5a CIPP TO BE DESIGNED TO ASTM F1216
�6 S 5555 „ y FOR FULLY DETERIORATED PIPE.
55 e S
RIDGEMONT BOULEVARD SS -TOLE VALLEY CURB-
PR. BOLE TREE (50' PUBLIC R/W-NOT OPEN) REPLACEMENT
PROTECTION FENCE PR. 54LF TREE RELOCATE 38LF OF
PROTECTION FENCE e' CIP WATER MAIN
ti EX. t53LF OF 48' RCP
I REPLACE BRIC HEADWALL WITH " TO BE REMOVED
NCDOT 838.01 CONC. HEADWALL
o IO BAL SAFETY RAIL CLDS 50.04 zO Ax 5' OA
OE
I PR. INV. IN=680.47 f O C
REMOVE EX RIP RAP AS
INECESSARYFORCONSTRUCTION 8
y` E ,95 LF 48•�P'PIPE'� F
0+50
�B
Oi
O_
EX. ENDWALL
TO REMAIN
84
80
RCP
MAIN
76
74
0+00
/4 I/ / I \ \30-
700
OAK\
O G
mll
/ \ o�Bloeai
OZ i
m
��k a
cO-Y
NECKIEN7pJ ory Ron \
III
PO�r
28°i1 R D i�
13
y QE
VIN- III I EX ENDWALC�
IINV2\1 (WEg1j7R ~ TOREMAIN
NV OUT -55.4. D( (EAST))ss
680
II
ar
\
\ _
OE
\\
AND BUS
'- "'�
NX
�y
. CATCH BABI
DO
-11711 t
2.2
IT=s7 .t30LF OF 48' RCP TO BE LINED
4e y42
sxsr. ze fi P"" NN our--sas E IORIAULLYDETERIORATED PIPE Halm r-IaT0.
91u�6aH.5042 3 o I
11-T DAN
o -STORM -DR -A, AGEP Nv °u -
=-F^sT REPLACE SINGLE TC
ne aeaziacE7ao7
BASIN WITH DBL CATCH BASIN.
F. X:
�r M SDff 4 / \ r 6 WN 2OF 2UNCTION BOX ON SHEET
N PR. (7) 12'A ± + T _E EX. t14TO BE REMOVED cRpvFL °`R Av I 3 o II / ` I
TERRA AQUARENO ) EX. CONCRETEEJJUNCTION R£V. s91.2a
MATTRESSES OR 5005Y SEEDBMULCH _BOX TO BE REM O D '�uu
EQUIVALENT DISTURBED AREAS -3 TONS INCIDENTAL ST. II I� / / ygl�l sbss oLAN R rS-ssl.za
_ PR. 25LF TREE
PR. 555Y NA GREENS P3�OR � ��r ytEDRIVEWANV REPAIR - PI�OTECTIONF tVUE
I EQUIVALENT REINFORCED MATTING / / )I}IEIpI'N zees rva ry 8oa aulLDlrvc
PR. INV. IN 0.89 \ m )Il ll�a
FFE=sssl7 DR 60Mua D55 \ �I 20 TONS ASPHALT
OII
PAVEMENT REPL 01, NTI -/
PLAN SVILNIND ° �� R - TON ROAD I III I� G
700
PR. NCDOT
838.01 GONG.
HEADWALL
692
TOP OF WALL
689.70
688
PR aux B
680
676
700
696
692
688
684
680
676
700
696
692
688
684
680
1+64.30
1+91.85
700
700
696
696
692
692
688
688
684
684
680
680
676
676
700
700
696
696
692
692
688
688
684
684
680
680
676
676
700
696
692
688
684
680
CALL NO en CHANNEL SECTION VIEWS AT HEADWALL
BEFORE YOU DIG PIPE 1 CL
SCALE: 1"=10'
1-800-632-4949
AVOID UTUTY DAMAGE
LEGEND
r - 1 EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT
STORM PIPE REPLACEMENT
® PROPOSED CONCRETE VALLEY
LACEM NT
STORM PIPE CURB REP
RENO MATTRESS PROPOSEDSTORM
PIPE REPAIR
CHANNEL O GRAVEL
PROTECTION
MATTING
CATCH BASIN
© EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
0 EXISTING TELEPHONE
PEDESTAL
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
55 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
W EXISTING WATER
0 EXISTING WATER METER
G EXISTING GAS
DT EXISTING TELEPHONE
E EXISTINGEASEMENT 1
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
\.
R/W EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
1+71.81
70C
1+81.83
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL
OLDSAND NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS LATEST EDITIONS.
),
Z. UTILITIES SHOAND MAY NO BE COMPJECTLETE.
AREA CONTRACTOR
13 FULLON AY
LIMIRES O SURVEYGISCONCORDSTACTING HISTORICAL
MAPPING, AND MAY NOT N COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTILITIES ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
3. CONTRACTORRESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SHALL CONFORM TO TH-
REQUIREMENTSS OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
HANDBOOK (WA EXCAVATION
4. ALL STAGING, EXCAVATION, STOCKPILING, AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE RIGHT C=
WAV, PERMANENT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT.
5. OBSTRUCTIONS WITHIN THE EASEMENT, SUCH AS PLANTERS, FENCES, OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES, SHALL e-
REMOVED WHEN NECESSARY REPLACED IN KIND,
6. ALL AREAS DISTURBEDRBEDDURING
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE, RAKED. SEEDED
AND MULCHED.
7. CURB TRANSITIONS AROUND PROPOSED CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PER OLDS DETAIL 10 29
8. 2'-6" CONCRETE CURB AND G MINIMUM SEPAION SHALL BE PER OLDS DETAIL ORIZ
B. 48" PIPING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 2 FEET MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM OUTSIDE
PIPE DIAMETER -TO -OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER.
10. CIPP TO BE DESIGNED TO ASTM F1216 FOR FULLY DETERIORATED PIPE.
GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1. RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATE CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PRACTICES WITH METHODS THAT MEET ALL OSE.
REQUIREMENTS.
2. ALL DEWATERING OF CONDUIT IN PREPARATION FOR SEALING, BACKGROUTING, AND COATING PROCESS F
NEEDED.
3. COORDINATE WITH CMSWS INSPECTOR FOR SCHEDULING OF CCTV AS NEEDED.
4. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY PER CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
5. VENTILATION AND AIR QUALITY DETECTION OF WORK AREA.
8. MATERIAL NEEDED TO FILL LARGE BLOWOUTS OR SINKHOLES ADJACENT TO STORM DRAINAGE PIPES BEIN:
REPAIRED,
7. ALL CLEAN UP OF WORK AREA,
RENO MATTRESS TYPICAL DETAIL
NOTES: NTS
1. RENO MATTRESSES SHALL BE TERRA AQUA OR EQUIVALENT.
Z. MATTRESSES SHALL BE FABRICATED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE SIDES, ENDS, LID, AND DIAPHRAGMS CAN BE
ASSEMBLED ON SITE INTO RECTANGULAR BASKETS OF THE SPECIFIED SIZES.
3. MATTRESSES SHALL BE SINGLE UNIT CONSTRUCTION WHEREBY THE BASE. LID, ENDS, AND SIDES. SHALL BE
IN SUCH A MANNER THATSTRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY AT^THE POINT•OF CONNECTION IS AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT
OF THE MESH.
4. PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES TO MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A975-97 DOUBLE
TWISTED HEXAGONAL WIRE MESH GALVANIZED STEEL WITH A MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 0-S INCH (12 GAGE).
5. MESH OPENING SHALL BE HEXAGONAL IN SHAPE AND UNIFORM IN SIZE MEASURING 2-1/2"13-1/4
6. STONE FOR MATTRESSES SHALL BE 3 6INCHES, DURABLE AND FREE FROM SEAMS AND CRACKS. WEATHERED
STONE SHALL NOT BE USED.
PROP. NA GREENS P300 OR
EQUIVALENT REINFORCED MATING T
SDE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PIPE
- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
1
EXTILE
24 TYPE 2 RATION A1111
FILTRATION FABRIC
12. 2"
BACKFILL WITH
ASPHALT
STRUCTURE FILTER FABRIC
- - - - TREE PROTECTION FENCE
SELECT FILL
BASECOURSE
GRADE
REQUIRED ON
THOROUGHFARES
6
2 6'•C&G
AND BUS
'- "'�
BACKFILL WITH
EXCAVATABLE
ROUTES OR
VARIES
PAVEMENT
FLOWABLE FILL
TG PIPING
PROPOSED PROPOSED
BV THE100%
ENGINEER
SPRING LINE
RCP RCP
1 MILLING AND
)'
O
NOTES: PIPE JOINT
RESURFACING (MIN)
1. ALL O-RING PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH ATYPE 2 GEOTEXTILE FILTRATION
FABRIC.
2. GEOTEXTILE WRAP SHALL BE SECURED WITH TAPE, STRING, OR OTHER FASTENING
METHOD PRIOR TO BACKFILL BEING PLACED,
STORM PIPING TRENCH DETAIL
PIPE JOINT
N. T. S.
WRAPPING DETAIL
PROPOSED 1j"
SURFACE COURSE
VARIES
95% DENSI
Y
7.5" ASPHALT PATCH
(MIN) OR AS SHOWN IN
�� S'MIN.
PROP. NA GREENS P300 OR
EQUIVALENT REINFORCED MATING T
SDE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
1
1
-Z- / / / � EXISTING BUILDING PROP. GEOTEXTILE
ASPHALT
STRUCTURE FILTER FABRIC
- - - - TREE PROTECTION FENCE
RENO MATTRESS AND MATTING
INSTALLATION TYPICAL DETAIL
N TS
0 20 40 NOTES:
2 RENO MATTRESSES SHALL BE KEYED INTO SLOPE A MINIMUM OF 1'.
Z. EXTEND MATTING AMINIMUM BEYOND EXISTING SLOPE
10 30 3. INSTALL MATTING ANCHORS, STAPLES AND SEAMS PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS.
SCALE: 1"=20'
MIN. 3"
vcL�vv
ASPHALT
BASECOURSE
REQUIRED ON
THOROUGHFARES
6
2 6'•C&G
AND BUS
'- "'�
EXISTING
ROUTES OR
PAVEMENT
AS DIRECTED
BV THE100%
ENGINEER
1'-0"
DENSITY
1'-6"
1 MILLING AND
)'
RESURFACING (MIN)
TRENCH TO BE
BACKFILLED WITH
VARIES
95% DENSI
Y
APPROVED SUITABLE
MATERIAL AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER
PIPE (DIAMETER
O
VARIES)
PAVEMENT REPAIR WTTH MILLING AT CURB AND GUTTER WITH STORM
DRAINAGE -N.T.S.
1. FULL -DEPTH PAVEMENT
REPAIR IN PLACE OF MILLING MAY
BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DIRECTION OF
THE ENGINEER. IF FULL
-DEPTH OPTION IS CHOSEN, 5' MEASUREMENT TO BE TAKEN FROM EDGE
OF TRENCH.
12
N G } c N
� L -
<
o -

Appendix V - Previous Agency Approvals

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2016-00221 County: MecklenburIl U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -CHARLOTTE West
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee
Address:
Telephone Number:
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
Ms. Erin Turner
600 East Fourth St.
Charlotte, NC, 28202
704-336-4495`'
Size (acres) 5
Nearest Waterway Stewarts Creek
USGS HUC 03050103
Nearest Town Charlotte
River Basin Lower Catawba
Coordinates Latitude: 35.2345
Longitude: -80.8857
Location description: The Royston Road Stromwater Improvement project begins southwest of the intersection of Royston
Road with Camp Greene Street and extends approximately 0.25 mile west along an unnamed tributary that flows into Stewart
Creek, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit verification authorizes the impact to 1,268 if of stream channel resulting
from restoration and stabilization efforts. Additionally, this verification authorizes the replacement of existing failing
stormwater structures with new structures and will result in the new temporary impact to 20 if of stream channel.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 3 Maintenance and NWP 27 Aquatic
Habitat Restoration Establishment and Enhancement Activities
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application dated 12/22/2015 and the ensuing record. Any violation of the attached conditions
or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I
administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Crystal Amschler at 828-274-79M x231 or Cr stal.C.Amschler usace.arm .mil.
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2/4/2016
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2017

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A' ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW -
Basis For Determination: Determination was based on review of aerial photography, USGS, soils and
information provided by the City of Charlotte. The tributary was determined using OHWM and flows into Stewart Creek
which flows into Irwin Creek which flows into Sugar Creek, which flows into the Catawba River, a Section 10 Water. .
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B
and C above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
**Itis not necessary to submit an RFthe Divisi Off if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: -
Crystal Amschler
Date of JD: 2/4/2016
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at http://re ug latory.usacesuive .com/.
Copy furnished:
Kimley Horn, Attn: Chris Tinklenburg, South Tryon, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202

SAW -2016-00221
Permittee:
Project Name:
County: Mecklenburg
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services, Ms. Erin Turner
Royston Road Stromwater Improvement project
Date Verification Issued: 2/4/2016
Project Manager: Crystal Amschler
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Crystal Amschler, Project Manager
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

F n
.� � I�UT�C.�.TICQN' Off' ADMIN��TRA�:IV,i� APPEAL UI4� AND y
���;'ROCI:��S ���
y
�/
„fiY✓ �,a ,,. ,?,,;, ..So>. .<s� s .J, �/ 2, �vY,.3."r=� �„�, 5,.. .: ��s. �i,�T ,.T.. a. ., „ .s. ,, .,: � 6.Y s„�,✓5-s;. ,t ,._/ .z✓ s� , ,`a,. .h #_�� _<;, ��w_-
Applicant: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water, Ms.
File Number: SAW -2016-00221
Date: 2/4/2016
Erin Turner
Attached is: See Section below
R1 INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
nj APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
NJ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your .
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminaf.y JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 1I - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Crystal Amschler, Project Manager
CESAD-PDO
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Crystal Amschler, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208, Asheville,
North Carolina 28801.
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Water Pesources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALtI Y
January 25, 2016
Mr. Isaac Hinson
Charlotte/Mecklenburg Storm Water
600 E. Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Se<re€crr
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
DWR# 15-1318
Mecklenburg County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Royston Rd. Storm Drainage Project
Dear Mr. Hinson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those
conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated December 1,
2015, and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on December 22,
2015. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered
by Water Quality General Certification Number 3883 & 3885 which can be viewed on
our web site at hftp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401. The General Certification
allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 3 & 27 once they are issued to you by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Please note that you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those
required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and
Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions
of the Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the
requirements of the Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you
may be required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given
a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H.0506 and 15A NCAC 02B
.0243(8), 15A NCAC 02H .0507.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office) 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at
the approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)
3. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is
recommended where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening
methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless
approved by DWR
4. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream (restoration)
0 linear ft.
1,268 linear ft.
Stream
20 linear ft.
140 linear ft.
Wetland
0 acre
0 acre
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General
Statute 150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the
Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from
the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431-
3000.
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed
with the OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along
with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours
(Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original
and one (1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by
the OAH within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address
for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the
Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office
in Raleigh 919-807-6360.

Sincerely,
y -v2 W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: William Elliot, Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville (email)
Chris Tinklenberg, Kimley-Horn, (email)
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality

Appendix VI - Stream Assessment Methodology (SAM) Rating
Form

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
raccompanies user n,anuai version c. i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Royston Drive SDIP 2. Date of evaluation: 2/19/2018
3. Applicant/owner name: Charlotte Storm Water Services 4. Assessor name/organization: D. Homans / S&ME
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Stewart Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.234698, -80.885347
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S1, DS of Royston 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): -200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 F Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 15 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? C Yes C No
14. Feature type: fi Perennial flow ti Intermittent flow f -Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: , Mountains (M) (a- Piedmont (P) C Inner Coastal Plain (I) (' Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
17. Watershed size: (skip
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
,;ia C_
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
,,-- Size 1 (< 0.1 mi`) Ij Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi`) ,;-- Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi`) ,;-- Size 4 (>> 5 mi`)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ii Yes [ No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
F Section 10 water F Classified Trout Waters F Water Supply Watershed ( i- I - II III �_ " IV ti - V)
F Essential Fish Habitat F Primary Nursery Area F High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
F Publicly owned property F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect F Nutrient Sensitive Waters
F Anadromous fish F 303(d) List F CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
F Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
F Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? `' Yes
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
4 A Water throughout assessment reach.
i- B No flow, water in pools only.
`- C No water in assessment reach.
16
No
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
4 A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
, - B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`i A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
C A < 10% of channel unstable
C B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
fe C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
C A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
C B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
i C C " C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
r B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F_ C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
r D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
F F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
r G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
r H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
r J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather -watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
f A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C: C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream - assessment reach metric
f Yes f No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types - assessment reach metric
10a. (- Yes (- No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) H m F_ G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F1 B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent w U) Cr H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation r o I Sand bottom
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) t pm r J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots O r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
r E Little or no habitat
*******REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS***********-****-*********
11. Bedform and Substrate -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a.( -Yes f: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
F, A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11 c)
F B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
F C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach - whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) =
absent, Rare (R) = present but <_ 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C
A P
f: C' Bedrock/saprolite
C (T C
f C Boulder (256 - 4096 mm)
C i C
f: C Cobble (64 - 256 mm)
Gravel (2 - 64 mm)
Sand (.062-2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
C' is C'
f C' Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. C Yes C No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. - Yes r' No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. C No Water C Other:
12b. (a Yes r' No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
F r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r r Beetles (including water pennies)
F_ FP Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
F_ r Asian clam (Corbicule )
F_ r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
F r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r r Dipterans (true flies)
F_ r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
F_ r Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
F_ r Midges/mosquito larvae
F_ r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
F_ r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )
F r Other fish
FV_ r Salamanders/tadpoles
F r Snails
F_ r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
F_ r Tipulid larvae
F F Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
C' A r A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C' B r B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C: C (: C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
C' A r A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
C B r B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C.' C f: C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
(' Y r Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ro N i N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
r A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
F B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
F D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
F A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
F%o C Urban stream (>! 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
r F None of the above
18. Shading —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
r' A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
t+ B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
r' C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
f A t o C A C A z 100 -feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
C B B C B f: B From 50 to < 100 -feet wide
C C i C C` C C' C From 30 to < 50 -feet wide
C' D i' D C D C D From 10 to < 30 -feet wide
f: E i' E G' E C E < 10 -feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
C A C A Mature forest
f B f: B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C: C C' C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
C D C D Maintained shrubs
C E C E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
f A C A C A C A f A i' A Row crops
C: B i' B C" B C' B C' B f B Maintained turf
C C C' C C C C' C C C f C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
C D i' D f D [' D C D f D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
C' A C: A Medium to high stem density
C B C B Low stem density
Co C C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 -feet wide.
LB RB
C' A C' A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
C B C.' B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
to C C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
f A f A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
C' B R B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
f: C f C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. C.' Yes C No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. C No Water C Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
C A <46 f B 46 to < 67 f C 67 to < 79 G D 79 to < 230 f E >: 230
Notes/Sketch:

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Royston Drive SDIP Date of Evaluation
Stream Category Pat Assessor Name/Organization
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Function Class Rating Su
2/19/2018
D. Homans / S&ME
USACE/ NCDWR
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
NA
Overall
LOW