20151170 Ver 2_401 Application_20180518

C>)a 5' i
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions V" C, 1
SAW — 2015 - 02463
Prepare file folder 1-1
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Creek's Landing
2. Work Type: Private 7 Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 135 acres of property into a single-family
residential subdivision.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Carolina Development Services; POC: Jonathan McCall
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW -2015-02463, DWR 15-1170
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
South from the intersection of Weddington Road and Airport Road in Monroe, North Carolina
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 61a]: 060-030-23, 060-060-12, and 060-030-15
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Union
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Monroe
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 62a]: UTs to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba (HUC 03040103)
Authorization: Section 10 F1 Section 404 a Section 10 & 404 1-1
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
]Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
May 25, 2018
Mr. David Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Office
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29
and Water Quality Certification No. 4139
Creek's Landing
Union Co., North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Ms. Higgins:
The Creek's Landing site is approximately 135 acres in extent and is located south from the intersection of
Weddington Road and Airport Road in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of this
project is to develop a residential subdivision in a developing area of Union County, North Carolina. Carolina
Development Services, LLC, has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401
permitting services for this project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached.
Applicant Name: Carolina Development Services; POC: Mr. Johnathan McCall
Mailing Address: 6707 Fairview Road, Suite B, Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-401-7185
Street Address of Project: south from the intersection of Weddington Road and Airport Road in Union
County, North Carolina
Waterway: UTs to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
Basin: Catawba (HUC 03040103)
City: Union County Incorporated
County: Union
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 060-030-23, 060-060-12, and 060-030-15
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.001359°, -80. 655074°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Matthews, NC (1988) and Waxhaw, NC (1986)
Site Conditions
The project area consists mostly of forested land and open fields (Figure 2, attached). Typical on-site vegetation
includes willow oak (Quecus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense), winged elm (Ulmus alata), red maple (Acer rubrum), mockemut hickory (Carya tomentosa), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia),
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), and muscadine (Vitis roduntifolia).
NORTH CAROLINA ' SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
According to the Soil Survey of Union County' (Figures 3 and 4, attached), on-site soils consist of Badin
channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (BaC), Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (1302),
Badin channery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (BdC2), Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded (ChA), Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes (CmB), and Tarrus gravelly silty clay
loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (TbB2). Chewacla silt loam (ChA) is somewhat poorly drained and Cid channery
silt loam (CmB) is moderately well drained. Badin channery silt loam and silty clay loams (BaC, BdB2, and
BdC2, respectively) and Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam (TbB2) are well drained. Chewacla silt loam (ChA) is
listed as hydric in the National Hydric Soils List2 and as having hydric inclusions in the North Carolina Hydric
Soils List for Union County`
Jurisdictional Delineation
On February 16 and 20, 2015, CWS scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT) and
Erin Bradshaw Settevendemio, WPIT, delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, within
the project area (Figures 5a and 5b, attached). Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field),
classified, and surveyed with a sub -meter Trimble Geo7X GPS using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook,
with further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement, dated April
2012. A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of on-site jurisdictional wetland areas is attached as
DPI. A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of on-site non jurisdictional upland areas is attached
as DP2. The locations of these data points are identified as DP 1 and DP2 on Figure 5 (attached).
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCD)VR) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D -shaped dip net, taking
photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes classification) within
each on-site stream channel.
Results
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are eight jurisdictional
seasonal RPW stream channels (Streams A -H) and four jurisdictional wetlands (Wetlands AA -DD) located
within the project area (Figures 5a and 5b, attached). On -Site streams are unnamed tributaries to East Fork
Twelve Mile Creek. East Fork Twelve Mile Creek is part of the Santee River Basin (HUC 03050103)4 and is
classified as "Class C" waters by the NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as:
"Waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life
including propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture."
On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.47 acre, including 4,067 linear feet (If) of
jurisdictional stream channel. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 1.
' United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2014. Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina
a United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2012. National Hydric Soils List by State, accessed at
http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/
s United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA-NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
° " HUC is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
K

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Table 1. Su mary of on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Perennial Streams
Perennial streams are those that typically have year-round flow. These streams typically have greater
biological resources than intermittent streams, and are capable of supporting those resources that require
perennial flow. This section describes the on-site perennial streams and the field observations supporting
this determination.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two perennial stream
channels (Streams A and B, R5UB25) located within the project area.
Stream A originates off site and flows west near the northwestern property boundary for approximately 1,459
linear feet (If) within the project boundaries. The lower 1,0971f of Stream A is classified as a perennial stream.
Stream A ultimately drains to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek off site. Perennial Stream A exhibits strong
continuity of bed and bank, strong baseflow, moderate sinuosity, moderate presence of depositional bars and
benches, and a weak presence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Perennial Stream A scored 33.5 out of a possible 63
' R5UB2 = Perennial stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979
3
Stream
Jurisdictional
Intermittent/
Classification
NCDWR Stream
Length
Acreage
Feature
Perennial
Point
Classification Score
Linear Feet (If)
(ac.)
(SCP)
Perennial
SCP1
33.5
1,097
0.101
Stream A
Intermittent
SCP2
27.5
362
0.025
Perennial
SCP3
33
308
0.035
Stream B
Intermittent
SCP4
21
703
0.048
Stream C
Intermittent
SCP5
24.5
159
0.011
Stream D
Intermittent
SCP6
21
277
0.019
Stream E
Intermittent
SCP7
20
319
0.022
Stream F
Intermittent
SCP8
19.5
63
0.004
Stream G
Intermittent
SCP9
26.5
676
0.047
Stream H
Intermittent
SCPIO
19
133
0.009
0.321
Stream Total:
4,067 If
acre
Acreage
Jurisdictional Feature
Data Point (DP)
(ac.)
Wetland AA
DPI
0.043
Wetland BB
DPI
0.100
Wetland CC
DPI
0.004
Wetland DD
DPI
0.004
0.151
Wetland Total:
acre
0.472
Total Acreage:
acre
Perennial Streams
Perennial streams are those that typically have year-round flow. These streams typically have greater
biological resources than intermittent streams, and are capable of supporting those resources that require
perennial flow. This section describes the on-site perennial streams and the field observations supporting
this determination.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two perennial stream
channels (Streams A and B, R5UB25) located within the project area.
Stream A originates off site and flows west near the northwestern property boundary for approximately 1,459
linear feet (If) within the project boundaries. The lower 1,0971f of Stream A is classified as a perennial stream.
Stream A ultimately drains to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek off site. Perennial Stream A exhibits strong
continuity of bed and bank, strong baseflow, moderate sinuosity, moderate presence of depositional bars and
benches, and a weak presence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Perennial Stream A scored 33.5 out of a possible 63
' R5UB2 = Perennial stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979
3

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating perennial status (SCP I, attached). Photograph A
(attached) is representative of the perennial portion of the Stream A.
Stream B originates near the center of the site and flows south towards the southern property boundary for
approximately 1,011 If before continuing off site. The lower 3081f of Stream B is classified as a perennial
stream. Perennial Stream B exhibits strong continuity of bed and bank, strong baseflow, moderate sinuosity of
channel, moderate presence of depositional bars and benches, and a weak presence of iron oxidizing bacteria.
Perennial Stream B scored 33 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form,
indicating perennial status (SCP3, attached). Photograph B (attached) is representative of the perennial portion
of the Stream B
Intermittent Streams
Intermittent streams are those streams that exhibit continuous flow seasonally. This flow regime is the result of
a lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream channel.
Intermittent streams do not typically support aquatic life requiring year-round flow to support reproductive and
maturation stages.
The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are eight seasonal stream
channels (Streams A -H, R4UB26) located within the project area.
Stream A originates off site and flows west near the northwestern property boundary for approximately 1,4591f
within the project boundaries. The upper 3621f of Stream A is classified as a seasonal stream. Seasonal Stream
A exhibits strong bed and bank, weak baseflow, and an absence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream A
scored 27.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent
status (SCP2, attached).
Stream B originates near the center of the site and flows south towards the southern property boundary for
approximately 1,011 if before continuing off site. The upper 7031f of Stream B is classified as a seasonal
stream. Seasonal Stream B exhibits moderate continuity of bed and bank, weak baseflow, weak in -channel
structure, and an absence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream B scored 21 out of a possible 63 points on
the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP4, attached).
Stream C originates near the southwestern boundary and flows west along the southwestern property boundary
for approximately 1591f before continuing off site. Seasonal Stream C exhibits strong continuity of bed and
bank, moderate in -channel structure, weak baseflow, and an absence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal
Stream C scored 24.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating
intermittent status (SCP5, attached).
Stream D originates off site and flows southeast in the southwestern portion of the property for approximately
2771f before continuing off site. Seasonal Stream D exhibits moderate continuity of bed and bank, weak in -
channel structure, weak baseflow, and an absence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream D scored 21 out
of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP6,
attached).
Stream E originates in the northwestern portion of the property and flows southwest along the northern property
boundary for approximately 3191f before continuing off site. Seasonal Stream E exhibits moderate continuity
of bed and bank, weak in -channel structure, weak baseflow, an absence of sinuosity, and an absence of iron
oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream E scored 20 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream
Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP7, attached).
6 R4UB2 = Intermittent stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979
El

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Stream F originates in the northwestern portion of the property and flows southwest for approximately 63 if
before its confluence with Seasonal Stream E. Seasonal Stream F exhibits moderate continuity of bed and bank,
weak in -channel structure, weak baseflow, weak particle size of stream substrate, and an absence of iron
oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream F scored 19.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream
Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP8, attached).
Stream G originates in the eastern portion of the property and flows south for approximately 676 linear feet (It)
before becoming non jurisdictional near the southeastern property corner. Seasonal Stream G exhibits moderate
continuity of bed and bank, moderate in -channel structure, moderate baseflow, weak sinuosity, and an absence
of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream G scored 26.5 out of a possible 63 points on the NCD" Stream
Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP9, attached).
Stream H originates near the southeastern corner of the property and flows southeast for approximately 1331f
before tapering off. Seasonal Stream H exhibits weak continuity of bed and bank, weak in -channel structure,
weak baseflow, and an absence of iron oxidizing bacteria. Seasonal Stream C scored 19 out of a possible 63
points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP 10, attached).
Biological sampling within Seasonal Streams A -H revealed an absence of macrobenthos, crayfish, and
amphibians. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is present at least three months in a typical
year. Photographs C -I (attached) are representative of Seasonal Streams A -H, respectively.
Wetlands
The USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) define wetlands as: "Those areas that are
inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that
under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions."' The USACE uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands. These parameters are as
follows: 1) Hydrophytic Vegetation, 2) Wetland Hydrology, and 3) Hydric Soils. Except in certain atypical
situations, all three parameters must be present in order for an area to be determined to be a jurisdictional
wetland. This section describes each on-site jurisdictional wetland and the field observations that led to their
determinations.
Wetlands AA -DD are classified as forested wetlands (PFO 18). Figure 5 (attached) depicts the locations of these
wetlands. A Wetland Determination Data Form 1 (DP 1) is representative of these wetlands. Wetlands AA -DD
exhibit low chroma soils, presence of reduced iron, surface water depth of 0-2 inches, and saturation to the
surface. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willow oak, sweetgum, green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana). Photographs J- M (attached) are representative of
Wetlands AA- DD, respectively.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on July 2, 2015 to determine the
presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by
the project. In a response letter, dated July 19, 2015, SHPO states that they are "aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project". The SHPO response letter is attached. CWS also
' Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
8PF01 = Broad-leaved deciduous forested wetland, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979
5

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
consulted the SHPO online GIS service and National Register of Historic Places for Union County10 and
found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits.
Protected Species
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorerl I
on July 1, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened
species, or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on this review, there are no records of
federally -protected species within the project limits. A copy of the data review report is attached.
The Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Habitat for the Northern long-eared bat includes forested areas of any age,
rocky areas with boulders, and culverts greater than four feet wide. Due to recent population declines of
almost 89% caused by white -nose syndrome and continued spread of the disease, the Northern long-eared
bat now receives protection as a Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. A Threatened
species is defined as a taxon likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range".
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is requesting the documentation of amount of wooded acres
cleared in connection with any construction project that takes place within any county shown on the June
30, 2015 White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Map, attached. This project takes place within the Northern
long-eared bat habitat range. Due to the nature of this subdivision construction project, approximately 40
acres of wooded area will be cleared for this project and may trigger the need for a bat survey. Please
note that no physical surveying for potential habitat within this project has not been included in
this scope at this time.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 135 acres of property into a single-family
subdivision located in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 6, attached). Union County is experiencing
rapid population growth due its proximity to Charlotte, NC, Fort Mill and Rock Hill, SC and there is a
need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand. This project is not a phased project and
adjoining subdivisions are all owned by individuals and/or companies not associated with the Creek's
Landing project.
Road crossings are unavoidable in order to develop the site while meeting local planning ordinances
requiring appropriate emergency vehicle access to all parts of the subdivision (Figure 6, attached).
Avoidance
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all
conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 4139. All work will be constructed
in the dry. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are proposed.
The proposed road crossing is necessary in order to complete the subdivision and provide sufficient
ingress and egress for emergency vehicles throughout the development. Stream B divides the southern
9 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http://gis.ncder.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed June 23, 2015.
10 National Register of Historic Places for Union County http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/nc/union/state.html
" North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https://nenhde.natureserve.org/, Accessed July 1, 2015
12 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1973. Endangered Species Act. http://www.fws.gov/endangeredAaws-policies/
m

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
portion of the property in half. Therefore, alternative options for road access while avoiding impacts to
jurisdictional streams are limited. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize
disturbances to downstream waters.
In an attempt to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build"
alternative was considered. The property was purchased for the purpose of providing residential housing to
meet the growth and demand of an area in Union County experiencing significant population growth. A "No
Build" option would not meet the project goals of providing necessary housing to meet the current demand.
Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
Minimization
The original plan for the proposed road crossing was a piped conveyance instead of the currently proposed
culvert (Figure 7, attached). This original plan included a 1531f, 30 -inch, "L" -shaped reinforced concrete pipe
(RCP) with a 151f rip rap apron at the outlet. A straight culvert is the favored design as it will maintain aquatic
life passage, is easier to maintain, and has a lower potential to clog versus a piped conveyance.
Permanent impacts associated with this design totaled 167 linear feet of perennial stream channel. To avoid
greater impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., a straight culvert with stream relocation was chosen in lieu
of a piped conveyance (Figures 8 and 9, attached). The stream relocation plan is discussed on the next page
(page 8).
Impacts associated with the straight culvert design were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlet and
outlet of the proposed culvert in order to minimize the length required for the proposed crossing. The proposed
culvert was also designed to maintain bankfull channel dimensions upstream and downstream of the proposed
culvert.
The project has been thoughtfully designed to avoid impacts wherever possible. The currently proposed site
plan was developed as a result of this alternatives analysis and avoidance and minimization process. We believe
that the current site plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while avoiding impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters
associated with this project are limited to a total of 124 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel
(Stream B). Permanent impacts to Stream B are the result of the construction of a road crossing and
stream relocation. Additionally, the project proposes 125 if of temporary impacts to jurisdictional stream
channel due the proposed stream relocation. Proposed impacts are summarized in Table 2 (next page).
7

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Table 2. Proposed impacts to.jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Impact
Temporary
Impacts
Feature
Type
or
(linear feet)
Impacts (acre)
Permanent
Road Crossing (Culvert)
Permanent
109
0.01
Stream B
Stream relocation
Temporary
125
0.01
Stream relocation (net
Permanent
15
0.00
loss of waters)
Total Permanent Stream Impacts
124
0.01 acre
Total Temporary Stream Impacts
125
0.01 acre
Total Stream Impacts
2491f
0.02 acre
Road Crossing
The proposed road crossing is located in the southwestern portion of the property (Figure 6, attached).
The installation of a culvert for this road crossing will result in 1091f of permanent impacts to Perennial
Stream B. The proposed road crossing will utilize a 100 -linear foot, 30 -inch reinforced concrete pipe
(RCP) with headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried at
least six inches below the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. A
plan view is attached as Figure 8.
Stream relocation
To avoid greater impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the project proposes to relocate 125 linear
feet of Perennial Stream B immediately downstream of the proposed culvert (Figures 8 and 9, attached).
However, an extreme bend in Stream B makes it difficult to relocate the stream linear foot for linear foot
and thus creates a loss of 15 if during the relocation of the existing stream to the relocated stream.
Relocated Stream B will be constructed to maintain low flows and will have similar channel dimensions
as the original channel. In -stream structures will provide stabilization and prevent upstream incision, as
necessary.
Natural coconut matting, riparian seed, and native plants will be installed on both sides of the relocated
Stream B for bank stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation species will be chosen to fit in with the
existing plant community, as well as add diversity, particularly in the riparian zone. Currently, much of
the riparian area is dominated by invasive Chinese privet. Chinese privet and other invasive species such
as Japanese honeysuckle will be removed and/or treated.
On behalf of Carolina Development Services, CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction Notification
Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31, and
pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 4139.
Compensatory Mitigation
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with this project total of less than 150
linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel. We believe that the current site plan is the best possible plan
that meets the project goals while avoiding and minimizing impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to
the greatest extent possible. Therefore, our client is not proposing mitigation for this project.

Creek's Landing May 25, 2018
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 4139 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-408-1683, or through email at [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist
•Al���ti1g1�J, qrA
IOWA
u AO 00. sZP
°- GR�Gs f
Daniel Roberts
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Aerial Map
Figure 3. Current USDA -MRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 4. Historic USDA-NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 5a. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map — Aerial Overlay
Figure 5b. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts — Overview
Figure 7. Proposed Impacts — Alternative Analysis
Figure 8. Proposed Impacts — Plan View
Figure 9. Proposed Impacts — Stream Relocation
Agent Authorization Form
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29
NCDWR Stream Classification Forms (SCP I -SCP 10)
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP I-DP2)
Agency Correspondence
Representative Photographs (A -N)
cc: Mr. Jonathan McCall, Carolina Development Services
Mr. Matthew Velkovich, P.E., Summit
W

R CM♦,���rwswir" V
8
TaB .GDC MhA
IC GsB` MhA
36 Ud Tai3 BaB
'� _..
Weddington Raod �dQ2
6A Cm8
Bac
82
Bac Tbcz
CmB TaG
it mB T b62
ea8z
BdB2 — ChA r �.
t2 yt Qi t bit TbB2
BdC2
1162
g2 �mB gd82
�dCZ Bd82'
Ch A , Tb
ChAa' . BdB2
' W2
S Potter Road "4..
y _
t
t11
Soils - Description Legend
BaC—Badin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
BdB2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
BdC2—Badin channery silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded Project Limits
ChA—Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
CmB--Cid channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes Excluded Parcel
TbB2—Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE HISTORIC USDA NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY, SHEETS 17AND 22, DATED 1990
SCALE: 1" : 1000' DATE: 10-26-15 Historic USDA-NRCS Soil FIGURE No.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: Survey of Union County
2015-3535 AVH Creek's Landing 4
PPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Union Co., North Carolina
KMT WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015-3535

\ 264 4
: sem �� —�• "'\,, Bl/ l L79
7' ; \ \ \� 94
Otl-ooI
IXOf Js.
WCiIARFA k,\ `� �, ° T4 95
/ \ Lak 37 for x Lar Lor G76 LAT JI i x \ \\
72,
\PHASE Y KAP Y
CAIL
CA6 N PO /d
Lor JO 71 \
LOr
Lars ' 68�
W /
LOT YP C
z � 67E
z
H wm /Y�
N � < for ra
/
yRae � ��COi
LOT \�
m R R E9R:
y NF¢w LL s LorJ
LOT
POTn
oxjwf o�=o god CR
...
-���oymaigx wg�i�io1LLiNas'a�
i?
II
Project Limits
IP N
fi; /W mPA NL#,[LX LLC
WO=POW
C
a
-�
I
�— --
y�g 7�
a& 2.V Pr 011111
N g1.513A- E
525
•
��•
I 1
`
CIO, o •�07
L106
7
I �
� � .� t �
m
I/1� /l /Al1EY• / w I
• + IRf OI
G9 IOx PO JOBroe
LAND SERVICES, P.C.
LI
T
\
E
bzs�xeo
"04NEMM1PAIa. COM
REVISIONS
OI7
r
/
158 159 160 161 162f�
164 163
��
I
I
YFAS!
o
HE
uILE CREIX i_—
—
� 166 ��YY
7
157 / ` — — _ _ — ❑ ❑ O
y • 1ry Pi
u 1AM
.POND 2 O9 /Lir.
I
156 —
GT -UI---
&' POND 3 \
0-030-23
/155 154\ Acres
202' " O
201 200 199 \\ \ 170
/ YN
Z28 126 sf
%J
V 84
\ \ V 172.
I
86 265 260 PH SE
� N�
173
\ 264 4
: sem �� —�• "'\,, Bl/ l L79
7' ; \ \ \� 94
Otl-ooI
IXOf Js.
WCiIARFA k,\ `� �, ° T4 95
/ \ Lak 37 for x Lar Lor G76 LAT JI i x \ \\
72,
\PHASE Y KAP Y
CAIL
CA6 N PO /d
Lor JO 71 \
LOr
Lars ' 68�
W /
LOT YP C
z � 67E
z
H wm /Y�
N � < for ra
/
yRae � ��COi
LOT \�
m R R E9R:
y NF¢w LL s LorJ
LOT
POTn
oxjwf o�=o god CR
...
-���oymaigx wg�i�io1LLiNas'a�
i?
II
Project Limits
IP N
fi; /W mPA NL#,[LX LLC
WO=POW
C
Proposed Impacts
-Overview
SA&
UMMIT
_
/
7
LAND SERVICES, P.C.
/
T
\
bzs�xeo
"04NEMM1PAIa. COM
REVISIONS
OI7
r
/
1
N
1
/
```----
• \ ,90^
POINTOF COMMENCEMENT
NGSSMMONUMENTHENT
NC GRID COORDS.(NAD83 2011)
N(Y) 473,376.86 KF(
E(X) 1,519,684.02 SFr
o
/ POND 1
11
2. I
1
34 35 36 %
\ 5
_ 37if \
6 960030-15 -�_i 11 11
2A895 Amu_ —
;iF. 45 sf___ �1 4p 1 \
• os s 4 1
36 _---- SE.
r m
5�1 1 32 `�\� IB 41 \Ia4
`135
42nV
! m
S1 \ 1 _♦ I c
to rata Pc ,r7s
eFa�nr
1 30
t ^ � 1 13� 1 11 1 I
4 � G9 s� A
opus-orre }I Fj 1
IIIIIIIYIII
DIP M r IP OM � 9
DOfO Oit
Z8 1 cuavc Anc LErvc.N 0) DELTA ArvcLE cRoao EEAawc cHoaD LE- -4
1 ( a zss.Kr -szs.ao' --1,s n3°3aze' w zn.Ko W W
131
1r 2�7 ➢
N 7gg2'05 G
26 I
eL W F Z
1 11 1 12i1
!t r ►En
0
25 11
A �1 IG 1 I aaaa:o-ne W
128 C4
2 r 13nave av PC f r z
151 152 U) 1 24 _—�— �I �' I 4 ���I� w � W
'" o
-1
�j 15 1 121 I� O PROJECT:
zz
125
138 137 1 �ij \
17 G
20 ' \ \ c -------
1 I�
123 ~
No, m, ozA G9011` Qcn
•.! NY/a G 1/QIAIYIA' Lp
Ls fon Pit 7O1 1 1 122 / / �� \
121
� � 3 ➢ ; 1119 120 � % / / � \._'�--------� � � �J
m118 1 v 43\
101I 115 116 n
' 117 1 1 ❑ // , li Fs -1
j112 P4
I 1111, r► r 1 1lryJ'1 ILJI ��LVV�_ / 44 % CG2
45�
)posed Impacts D6 46 Cn
gure 7. Plan View and Profile5az SHEET
310110, PC f
55 54 53
Lu
F—
_✓ i_ _�
1PERfgY DANE' `� Y\ / � CL
LIJ
GHyP]u� s'Alr
or 00"7 PC MCIL35
w
FORK T W ELVE
ORIG.PROJ.DATE: 06-01-2015
4f q CREEK TRIBUTA
SCALE
'Al 2Sx25'SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25'SIGHT TRIANGLE ❑RAM BY: RUG
10'x70' SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70' SIGHT DISTANCE CHECKED BY. MGV
'-
�..---= FIG.
~ NOT TO KALE-''�72i14 lmn10V`-77vOp� n110�```
DIP M r IP OM � 9
DOfO Oit
Z8 1 cuavc Anc LErvc.N 0) DELTA ArvcLE cRoao EEAawc cHoaD LE- -4
1 ( a zss.Kr -szs.ao' --1,s n3°3aze' w zn.Ko W W
131
1r 2�7 ➢
N 7gg2'05 G
26 I
eL W F Z
1 11 1 12i1
!t r ►En
0
25 11
A �1 IG 1 I aaaa:o-ne W
128 C4
2 r 13nave av PC f r z
151 152 U) 1 24 _—�— �I �' I 4 ���I� w � W
'" o
-1
�j 15 1 121 I� O PROJECT:
zz
125
138 137 1 �ij \
17 G
20 ' \ \ c -------
1 I�
123 ~
No, m, ozA G9011` Qcn
•.! NY/a G 1/QIAIYIA' Lp
Ls fon Pit 7O1 1 1 122 / / �� \
121
� � 3 ➢ ; 1119 120 � % / / � \._'�--------� � � �J
m118 1 v 43\
101I 115 116 n
' 117 1 1 ❑ // , li Fs -1
j112 P4
I 1111, r► r 1 1lryJ'1 ILJI ��LVV�_ / 44 % CG2
45�
)posed Impacts D6 46 Cn
gure 7. Plan View and Profile5az SHEET
310110, PC f
55 54 53
Lu
F—
_✓ i_ _�
1PERfgY DANE' `� Y\ / � CL
LIJ
GHyP]u� s'Alr
or 00"7 PC MCIL35
w
FORK T W ELVE
ORIG.PROJ.DATE: 06-01-2015
4f q CREEK TRIBUTA
SCALE
'Al 2Sx25'SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25'SIGHT TRIANGLE ❑RAM BY: RUG
10'x70' SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70' SIGHT DISTANCE CHECKED BY. MGV
'-
�..---= FIG.
~ NOT TO KALE-''�72i14 lmn10V`-77vOp� n110�```

Seasonal RPW B
- 167 If permanent impacts (pipe)
153'30 -inch RCP piped conveyance
e
I J 0
J ,\
a �
0
7
r
1
Alternative Plan View Figure
/' Creek's Landing
Union Co., North Carolina 7
�' CWS Project No. 2015-3535

SD 1155-154 PROFILE
0+00 1+00 2+00
Proposed Impacts - Plan View and Profile
KEY MAP
Legend
Proposed Culvert
Proposed Impact
Proposed Steam Relocation
Proposed Relocated Stream
...... . Avoided Seasonal Stream
Avoided Perennial Stream
LEGEND
DETAIL DETAIL
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY LINE
— - - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
EXISTING CURB LINE
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
-n_•_ --- EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
—7zo EXISTING MA30R CONTOUR
—722 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
—720 PROPOSED MA30R CONTOUR
PROPOSED R.C.P.
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
12) PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
GRAPHIC SCALE
IIN FEET
Inch = 15,
CLIENT:
z �
w A
O z N
U V U
z
Q x Q o
w
a Pq
N
U N
W
C9
Z Q
Q z
0 < z
z C:) Q
C�I 75 Cl-
Q rr,
O
(1)
1
•

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Mr. Johnathan M McCall, representing Carolina Development Services, hereby certify
that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this
request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
App l'cant's signature
`7Z1�
Date
)�,� C- - 7J, -L �- -
Agent's signature
Date
7/l/1
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number-
umber:1c.
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Creek's Landing
2b. County:
Union
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Monroe
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
multiple
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Carolina Development Services
4b.
Name:
Mr. Jonathan McCall
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Development Services
4d.
Street address:
6707 Fairview Road, Suite B
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28210
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-401-7185
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f.
Fax no.:
704-527-1133
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
060-030-23, 060-060-12, and 060-030-15
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.001359 Longitude: -
80.655074
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
135 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba (HUC 03040103)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists mostly of forested land and open fields (Figure 2, attached). Typical on-site vegetation includes
willow oak (Quecus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), winged elm (Ulmus
alata), red maple (Acer rubrum), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), and
muscadine (Vitis roduntifolia).
According to the Soil Survey of Union County (Figures 3 and 4, attached), on-site soils consist of Badin channery silt
loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (BaC), Badin channery silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (BdB2), Badin channery silty
clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (BdC2), Chewacla silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (ChA), Cid
channery silt loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes (CmB), and Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (TbB2).
Chewacla silt loam (ChA) is somewhat poorly drained and Cid channery silt loam (CmB) is moderately well drained.
Badin channery silt loam and silty clay loams (BaC, BdB2, and BdC2, respectively) and Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam
(TbB2) are well drained. Chewacla silt loam (ChA) is listed as hydric in the National Hydric Soils List and as having
hydric inclusions in the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Union County
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.151 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1,405 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 2,662 linear feet of seasonal stream channel.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 135 acres of property into a single-family subdivision located in Union
County, North Carolina (Figure 6, attached). Union County is experiencing rapid population growth due its proximity to
Charlotte, NC, Fort Mill and Rock Hill, SC and there is a need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand.
This project is not a phased project and adjoining subdivisions are all owned by individuals and/or companies not associated
with the Creek's Landing project.
Road crossings are unavoidable in order to develop the site while meeting local planning ordinances requiring appropriate
emergency vehicle access to all parts of the subdivision (Figure 6, attached).
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with this
project are limited to a total of 124 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel (Stream B). Permanent impacts to
Stream B are the result of the construction of a road crossing and stream relocation. Additionally, the project proposes
125 If of temporary impacts to jurisdictional stream channel due the proposed stream relocation. Proposed impacts are
summarized in Table 2 (next page).
Road Crossing
The proposed road crossing is located in the southwestern portion of the property (Figure 6, attached). The installation of
a culvert for this road crossing will result in 109 If of permanent impacts to Perennial Stream B. The proposed road
crossing will utilize a 100 -linear foot, 30 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of
the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried at least six inches below the bed of the channel to allow passage of
aquatic life and maintain low flows. A plan view is attached as Figure 8.
Stream relocation
To avoid greater impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., the project proposes to relocate 125 linear feet of Perennial
Stream B immediately downstream of the proposed culvert (Figures 8 and 9, attached). However, an extreme bend in
Stream B makes it difficult to relocate the stream linear foot for linear foot and thus creates a loss of 15 If during the
relocation of the existing stream to the relocated stream.
Relocated Stream B will be constructed to maintain low flows and will have similar channel dimensions as the original
channel. In -stream structures will provide stabilization and prevent upstream incision, as necessary.
Natural coconut matting, riparian seed, and native plants will be installed on both sides of the relocated Stream B for bank
stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation species will be chosen to fit in with the existing plant community, as well as
add diversity, particularly in the riparian zone. Currently, much of the riparian area is dominated by invasive Chinese
privet. Chinese privet and other invasive species such as Japanese honeysuckle will be removed and/or treated.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Wetland Services
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW -2015-02463, by William Elliott on April 14, 2016
6.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
On April 14, 2016 a NWP 29 was issued under SAW -2015-02463 for the proposed project. Due to funding issues, the
project commencment and completion was not able to be obtained within twelve months of the date of the nationwide
permit's experation on March 18, 2017.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
PER or
(Corps - 404, 10
swiidth
Permanent P or
()
intermittent
DWQ —non -404,
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
Stream B
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4-5
109
S2 ®P ❑ T
Relocation (net
Stream B
® PER
® Corps
4-5
15
loss of water)
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ® T
Relocation
Stream B
® PER
El INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4-5
125
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
249
3i. Comments: Permanent impacts to jurisdictionial streams total 124 linear feet.
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet )
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality
Certification No. 4139. All work will be constructed in the dry. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are proposed.
The proposed road crossing is necessary in order to complete the subdivision and provide sufficient ingress and egress for
emergency vehicles throughout the development. Stream B divides the southern portion of the property in half. Therefore,
alternative options for road access while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional streams are limited. Proper sediment and erosion
control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
In an attempt to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build" alternative was
considered. The property was purchased for the purpose of providing residential housing to meet the growth and demand of
an area in Monroe experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project goals of
providing necessary housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from further
consideration.
Minimization
The original plan for the proposed road crossing was a piped conveyance instead of the currently proposed culvert (Figure 7,
attached). This original plan included a 153 If, 30 -inch, "L" -shaped reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with a 15 If rip rap apron at
the outlet. A straight culvert is the favored design as it will maintain aquatic life passage, is easier to maintain, and has a
lower potential to clog versus a piped conveyance.
Permanent impacts associated with this design totaled 167 linear feet of perennial stream channel. To avoid greater impacts
to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., a straight culvert with stream relocation was chosen in lieu of a piped conveyance (Figures
8 and 9, attached). The stream relocation plan is discussed on the next page (page 8).
Impacts associated with the straight culvert design were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlet and outlet of the
proposed culvert in order to minimize the length required for the proposed crossing. The proposed culvert was also designed
to maintain bankfull channel dimensions upstream and downstream of the proposed culvert.
The project has been thoughtfully designed to avoid impacts wherever possible. The currently proposed site plan was
developed as a result of this alternatives analysis and avoidance and minimization process. We believe that the current site
plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the
greatest extent practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality
Certification No. 4139. All work will be constructed in the dry. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are proposed.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
El Yes El No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached Stormwater Permit No. SW3150601
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Union County
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ 0 R
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
® Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer will tie into existing infrastructure.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on July 1, 2015 to
determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within
the project area. Based on this review, there are no records of federally -protected species within the project limits. A
copy of the data review report is attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?❑
Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://sharpfin.nmfs.noaa.gov/website/EFH_Mapper/map.aspx
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on July 2, 2015 to determine the presence of any
areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. In a response letter,
dated July 19, 2015, SHPO states that they are "aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project".
The SHPO response letter is attached. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service and National Register of
Historic Places for Union County and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the
project limits.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710540600J and 3710540500J
5-25-2018
Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
July 16, 2015
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Develop Creeks Landing Residential Subdivision, Weddington Road & Airport Road, Monroe,
CWS 2015-3535, Union County, ER 15-1533
Dear Ms. Harjuniemi:
Thank you for your letter of July 2, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
601'Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

ASA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat t -&Cory 13 raw GosW Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Director Sec retary
July 1, 2015
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
[e-mail]
RE: Creek's Landing; 2015-3535
Dear Aliisa Harjuniemi:
NCNHDE-436
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at allison.weakley(cDncdenr.gov or
919.707.8629.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Creek's Landing
Project No. 2015-3535
July 1, 2015
NCNHDE-436
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Freshwater Fish 10412 Etheostoma collis Carolina Darter 2013-05-28 Current 3 -Medium Species of Special G3 S3
Concern Concern
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
CTB/Twelvemile Creek Aquatic Habitat n/a (Not Applicable) C4 (Moderate)
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserye,org/ ont n /h lo. Data query generated on July 1, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Creek's Landing
Project No. 2015-3535
July 1, 2015
NCNHDE-436
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Status
Freshwater 29551
Villosa delumbis
Eastern Creekshell
2011-06-09
Current 3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Bivalve
Rare
Freshwater 115
Villosa vaughaniana
Carolina Creekshell
2011-06-09
Current 3 -Medium
Species of
Endangered
G2
S2
Bivalve
Concern
Freshwater Fish 10412
Etheostoma collis
Carolina Darter
2013-05-28
Current 3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G3
S3
Concern
Concern
Vascular Plant 15141
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's Sumac
1794-07-21
Historical 5 -Very
Endangered
Endangered
G2G3
S2
Low
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name
___.__.s°
Representational Rating
Collective Rating
CTB/Twelvemile Creek Aquatic Habitat
n/a (Not Applicable)
C4 (Moderate)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httns://ncnhde.natureserye.org/content/hel p. Data query generated on July 1, 2015; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-436: Creek's Landing
July 1, 2015
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 4 of 4
1:25,745
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 km
Sources: Esri, HERE. DeLomre, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GESCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL.

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 4, 2015
Carolina Development Services
Attn: Jonathan McCall
6707 Fairview Rd., Ste. B
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Creeks Landing
Dear Mr. McCall:
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Jecrrfort,
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Onrrror
DWR # 15-1170
Union County
On November 6, 2015, the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application
dated November 3, 2015, requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division for the
subject project. The Division has determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be
processed. The application is on -hold until all of the following information is received:
1. Storm Water Management Plan per condition #12 of General Certification 3890 must be
submitted and approved by DWR prior to issuance of the 401.
2. Clarification of impacts. It is stated that 15 If of stream will be lost during the relocation
of 140 If of stream channel. It is also stated that 9 If of rip rap is not included in the
impacts/loss of stream. Is the 9 If not included at all or is it included with the culvert
impact?
3. A stream relocation plan/restoration plan is required indicating the proposed method of
construction. (Condition #11, GC 3890)
Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H .0502(a) 8 / Title 15A NCAC 02H .506, the applicant shall furnish
all of the above requested information for the proper consideration of the application. If all of
the requested information is not received in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this
letter, the Division will be unable to approve the application and it will be returned. The return
of this project will necessitate reapplication to the Division for approval, including a complete
application package and the appropriate fee.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional OlTrcel 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 2S 11 S
704 663 1699

Please respond in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter by submitting
stormwater management plan for review to the 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. Please copy the Mooresville Regional Office regarding items #1
and #2.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under the Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
for this activity and any work done within waters of the state may be a violation of North
Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code.
Please contact Alan Johnson at 704-663-1699 or [e-mail] if you have any
questions or concerns.
(2 W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office
cc: Greg Antemann, Carolina Wetlands (email)
William Elliot, USACE Asheville, (email)
MRO files
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
December 7, 2015
Mr. Alan Johnson
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Subject: Creeks Landing DWR # 15-1170
Response to Request for Additional Information
Union County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Carolina Development Services has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
In response to your letter via email dated December 4, 2015 (attached):
1. Storm Water Management Plan per condition #12 of General Certification 3890 must be submitted
and approved by DWR prior to issuance of the 401.
- Please see the attached approved Stormwater Permit No. SW3150601 and Operations &
Maintenance Agreement.
2. Clarification of impacts. It is stated that 151f of stream will be lost during the relocation of 1401f
of stream channel. It is also stated that 9 If of rip rap is not included in the impacts/loss of stream.
Is the 91f not included at all or is it included with the culver impact?
- The beginning of the 125 1f of relocated stream starts at the end of the rip rap apron.
The apron will be constructed at the end of the culvert in an area that is non -
jurisdictional and does not have an existing channel. The linear footage of the
relocated stream starts at the end of the apron, therefore the 9 ft apron is NOT an
additional impact. We are NOT going to put rip rap into the relocated channel.
- There is a 15 If loss between the existing channel and relocated channel.
3. A stream relocation plan/restoration plan is required indicated the proposed method of construction
(Condition #11, GC 1890).
- CWS is currently in the process of preparing a relocation plan to be submitted to your
office once complete.
NORTH CAROLINA ' SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Weddington Walk December 7, 2015
Response to Request for Additional Information CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
Thank for you your consideration in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact us at 704-408-1683,
or through email at [e-mail] should you have any additional questions or comments
regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
zr-a- C. AU
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
Kelly aures, WPIT
Project Manager

----------------------
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2015-02463 County: Union USGS Quad: NC-MATTHEWS
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Jonathan McCall, Carolina Development Services
Address: 6707 Fairview Road, Suite B
Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No.: 704 4017185
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The project Creeks Landing
is located South from the intersection of Weddington Road and Airport Road in Monroe, North
Carolina, Coordinates: 35.00136,-80.65507
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes excavation and placement of fill
material associated with Permanent impacts of 1091ft culvert installation, 15 Ift stream relocation
and Temporary impacts of 1251ft.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: NW 29
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with
the attached conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated November 6, 2015.
Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to
a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked_ If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements. You may also visit their website at: http://portal.ncdenr.ore/web/wq/swp/ws/webscape
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at -27 9
Corps Regulatory Official William Elliott Date: April 14 2016
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2017

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at
http://per2.nwo.usace.gM.miUsurve .html to complete the survey online.

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:
There are stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The stream
channel on the property is known as East Fork Twelvemile Creek which flows into the Santee River.
This jurisdictional determination is valid for the impact areas only.
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for
the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland
conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or
anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Appeals Information: (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B and C above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object
to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must
submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of
the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address within 60
days from the Issue Date below.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: William Elliott
Issue Date: April 14 2016 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Date

Copy Furnished:
Gregg Antemann, PWS Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28273

Permit Number: SAW -2015-02463
Permit Type: NW 29
Name of County: Union
Name of Permittee: Jonathan McCall, Carolina Development Services
Date of Issuance: April 14 2016
Project Manager: William Elliott
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the
permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attention: CESAW-RG-A
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to
permit suspension, modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was
completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

NO`T'IFICATION OF .< DMINKIRAT1VE, APP. AL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUES'r FOR APPEAL
Applicant: .Jonathan Iv cC ill. SA\\' 01 4 Da11C: "Ar -d 14 2010
Services 02463 _
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of ermission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
PERMIT DENIAL _ C _
_ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
X PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additionalinformation may be found at
http://wA,•w_usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/reg materiats.aspx or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 33.1.
A: INI'T'IAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that
the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section H of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SETTaN Tl EQ�,T 1ZP'Aor 031E'I+C?NS T(3 !0nTIAL �F1ED 1E1 1
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
F 11TCT F R O Trea
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact:
also contact:
William Elliott, Project Manager
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
USACE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Ave
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
RM 208
60 Forsyth Street, Room l OM 15
Asheville, NC 28801
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
828-271-7980
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations_
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-
8801. Phone: [phone]

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD). 11/32015
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Carolina Development Services; POC: Jonathan McCall
6707 Fairview Road, Suite B, Charlotte, NC 28210
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: C SRVk6-
Wilmington DistrictIn/^ (�� —� 2 �� (%/ %N/]t/✓ �,yl / QGL
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
�
Located south from the intersection of Weddinton Road and Airport Road in Monroe, North Carolina
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Union City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.001359 ON Long, 80.655074 °W,
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters:
4,067 linear feet: 2-5 width (ft) and/or 0.321 acres.
Cowardin Class: R6UB2, R4UI32
Stream Flow: 1,405 If perennial, 2,662 If seasonal
Wetlands: 0.151
Cowardin Class: PF01
acres.
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(S): February 16 and 20, 2015
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
VData sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:,--.M�„.ko.�,V..y�.,�
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: union County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s).
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
Cite name:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): EsH, accessed 2015 or
Other (Name & Date): Site photographs of streams (February, 2015).
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter: I
❑ Other information (please specify):
7

1. The Carps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including Whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based ona preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of�//�
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Site
Number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardian
Class
Estimated
Aquatic Amount of
Resource in
Review Area
Class of Aquatic
Resource
Stream A
N35.001359
W80.655074
R5UB2
1,0971f
non -section 10 -- non -tidal
Stream A
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
362 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream B
N35.001359
W80.655074
R5UB2
308 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream B
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
703 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream C
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
159 if
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream D
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
277 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream E
N35.001359
WB0.655074
R4UB2
319 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream F
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
63 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream G
N35.001359
W80.655074
R41.1132
676 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Stream H
N35.001359
W80.655074
R4UB2
133 If
non -section 10 — non -tidal
Wetland AA
N35.001359
WB0.655074
PF01
0.043 acre
non -section 10 - wetland
Wetland BB
N35.001359
W80.655074
PF01
0.100 acre
non -section 10 —wetland
Wetland CC
N35.001359
W80.655074
PF01
0.004 acre
non -section 10 -- wetland
Wetland DD
N35.001359
W80.655074
PFOi
0.004 acre
non -section 10 -- wetland
1

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
Mr. Jonathan McCall
Carolina Development Services
2627 Breckonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 29110
PAT MCCRORY
(iarenus•
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secrelary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
prreclor
December 8, 2015
DWR# 15-1170
Union County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Creek's Landing
Dear Mr. McCall:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those
conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated November 3, 2015,
and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on November 6, 2015. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality
General Certification Number 3890 which can be viewed on our web site at
http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/wa/swr)/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the
Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the
Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in
the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507
2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the
approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)]
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Offtcel 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 SlooresAlle, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

3. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
0 linear ft.
126 linear ft.
Stream relocation
0 linear ft.
125 linear ft.
Wetland
0 acre
0 acre
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and
erosion control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and
turbidity. This includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506
(b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be
matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. A final, written storm water management is required per condition #12 of the General
Certification. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a
manner such that the potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted
due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(5)
7. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is
recommended where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If
riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR
8. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in
waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
9. A final stream design (for the relocated stream section) shall be submitted and
approved by staff prior to any stream impacts at the site.
10. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the
permit drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)
11. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and
maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute
150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http://wv4w.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable
OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00
am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).

The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one
(1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within
five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: Greg Antemann, CWS (email)
William Elliot, Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville (email)
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. David Cuthbertson
Carolina Development Services, LLC
2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Dear Mr. Cuthbertson:
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
December 4, 2015
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW3150601
Creeks Landing Subdivision
High Density Dry Detention Stormwater Project
Weddington, Union County
The Stormwater Permitting Unit received a complete package for the Creeks Landing Subdivision
project on October 6, 2015. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the
project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC
2H.1000 and Session Law 2006-246. We are forwarding this Stormwater Management Permit No.
SW3150601, issued December 4, 2015, for the construction, operation and maintenance of the
subject project and the stormwater BMPs.
This permit shall be effective from the original date of issuance until December 4, 2023, and shall
be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other
agency permit that may be required. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this
permit regarding the Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions,
procedures for changes of ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the permit. Failure to
establish an adequate system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management
system, to record deed restrictions, to follow the procedures for transfer of the permit, or to renew
the permit, will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. Per NCGS 143-215(e) the petition must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a
filing fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
NC 27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
1601 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] Internet: www ncdencgov
An Equal Opportunity ' Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

Ir
Mr. David Cuthbertson
Carolina Development Services, LLC
SW3150601 — Creeks Landing Subdivision, Union County
December 4, 2015
After thirty days from the date of this letter, this project will be kept on file at the NCDENR Division
of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources, Land Quality Section, Mooresville Regional Office. If you
have questions after that time, please contact Zahid Khan, zahid.khan(c�ncdenr.gov, of that office.
Until that time, if you have any questions or need additional information concerning this permit,
please contact Bill Diuguid at [phone]; or bill.diuguidCa),ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Original Signed by William H. Diuguid
William H. Diuguid, AICP, Plans Reviewer
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM
Director, Division of Energy,
Mineral and Land Resources
cc: NCDENR DEMLR Mooresville Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Attachments

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Carolina Development Services, LLC
for the Creeks Landing Subdivision
Weddington Road, Highway 84
Weddington, Union County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of one wet detention basin and five dry
detention basins and a disconnected imperviousness design in compliance with the
provisions of 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and S.L. 2006-246 (hereafter referred to as the
"stormwaterrulesl and the approved stormwater management plans and specifications
and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of
Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR), Land Quality Section and considered a
part of this permit.
This permit dated December 4, 2015 shall be effective from the original permit date of
issuance until December 4, 2023, and shall be subject to the following specified
conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Section 1.7 of this permit. The stormwater control has been
designed to handle the runoff from 1,182,378 square feet of impervious area.
3. The tract will be limited to the amount of built -upon area indicated in Section 1.7
of this permit, and per approved plans.
4. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project
will be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
5. The runoff from all built -upon area within the permitted drainage area of this
project must be directed into the permitted stormwater control system.
Page 1 of 6

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
6. The built -upon areas associated with this project shall be located at least 30 feet
landward of all perennial and intermittent surface waters.
7. The design criteria have been provided for in the one wet detention basin and
five dry detention basin designs and must be maintained at design condition as
shown in the approved site plan.
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated and operational for its intended use prior to the completion of any
built -upon surface and the issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
2. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
3. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum
efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must be followed in
its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals including, but
not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of slopes and the vegetated filter.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of all slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of outlet structure, orifice device, flow
spreader, catch basins and piping.
g. Access to the outlet structure must be available at all times.
4. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon
request to authorized personnel of DEMLR. The records will indicate the date,
activity, name of person performing the work and what actions were taken.
5. The stormwater treatment system shall be constructed in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications, the conditions of this permit, and with other
supporting data.
6. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received
from an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification. A
modification may be required for those deviations.
7. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility.
8. Access to the stormwater facilities shall be maintained via appropriate
Page 2 of 6

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
easements at all times.
9. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to any item shown on the approved plans, including the
stormwater management measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of all or part of the project
area. The project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee,
for which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA
Major permit was sought.
f. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
10. The permittee shall submit final site layout and grading plans for any permitted
future areas shown on the approved plans, prior to construction.
11. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for a minimum of ten years from the date of the completion of
construction.
12. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee
shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director
that the changes have been made.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is not transferable except after notice to and approval by the Director.
In the event of a change of ownership, or a name change, the permittee must
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change form, to the Division of Energy,
Mineral and Land Resources, Land Quality Section, signed by both parties, and
accompanied by supporting documentation as listed on page 2 of the form. The
project must be in good standing with the Division. The approval of this request
will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such
time as the Division approves the transfer request.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to enforcement action by the Division of Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources, Land Quality Section, in accordance with North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation
of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of
Page 3 of 6

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permittee grants DENR Staff permission to enter the property during normal
business hours for the purpose of inspecting all components of the permitted
stormwater management facility.
7. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and re -issuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
8. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
control must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
9. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules and regulations contained in Session Law 2006-
246, Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000, and NCGS 143-215.1 et.al.
11. The permittee shall notify the Division of any name, ownership or mailing
address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
12. The permittee shall submit a renewal request with all required forms and
documentation at least 180 days prior to the expiration date of this permit.
This Permit issued this the 4th day of December, 2015.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Original Signed by William H. Diuguid
William H. Diuguid, AICP, Plans Reviewer
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM, Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 4 of 6

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
Creeks Landing Subdivision
Stormwater Permit No. SW3150601
Weddington Road, Union County
Designer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered
in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/
full time) the construction of the project,
Creeks Landing Subdivision, Weddington Road, Union County
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
Page 5 of 6
SEAL

State Stormwater Permit
Permit No.SW3150601
Certification Requirements:
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The outlet/bypass structure elevations are per the approved plan.
6. The outlet structure is located per the approved plans.
7. Trash rack is provided on the outlet/bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been
provided.
12. Required drawdown devices are correctly sized per the approved plans.
13. All required design depths are provided.
14. All required parts of the system are provided, such as a vegetated shelf,
and a forebay.
15. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
Please submit this Designer's Certification to: Zahid Khan, Regional Engineer
NCDENR DEMLR
Mooresville Regional Office
Land Quality Section
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Page 6 of 6

High Density Residential Subdivisions
Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenances
In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H.1000 and S.L. 2006-246, the Stormwater Management Regulations,
deed restrictions and protective covenants are required for High Density Residential Subdivisions where
lots will be subdivided and sold and runoff will be treated in an engineered stormwater control facility. Deed
restrictions and protective covenants are necessary to ensure that the development maintains a "built -upon"
area consistent with the design criteria used to size the stormwater control facility.
I, David Cuthbertson , acknowledge, affirm and agree by my signature below, that I will
cause the following deed restrictions and covenants to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot:
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State Stormwater
Management Permit Number S W /S 0601 , as issued by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources under the Stormwater Management Regulations.
2. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent necessary to
maintain compliance with the storm water management permit.,
3. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties claiming under
them.
4. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without the express written
consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
5. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plan may not take place without the concurrence
of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
6. The maximum allowable built -upon area per lot is 5700 square feet. This allotted amount
includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and that portion of the
right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area includes, but is not
limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, coquina and parking areas, but does
not include raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming pools.
OR, if the proposed built -upon areas per lot will vary, please REPLACE #6 above with the following:
6. The maximum built -upon area per lot, in square feet, is as listed below:
Lot # BUA Lot # BUA Lot # BUA Lot # BUA
This allotted amount includes any built -upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries, and
that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built upon area
includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate, coquina and
parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the water surface of swimming
Pools.
7. Each lot will maintain a 30** foot wide vegetated buffer between all impervious areas and surface
waters.
**50 foot for projects located in the 20 coastal counties.
8. All runoff from the built -upon areas on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be
accomplished through a variety of means including roof drain gutters which drain to the street, grading
the lot to drain toward the street, or grading perimeter swales to collect the lot runoff and directing them
into a component of the stormwater collection system. Lots that will naturally drain into the system are
not required to provide these additional measures.
Form DRPC-3 Rev.2 05Nov2009 Page 1 of 2

i
Signature i Date: A19 J� `
-Notary Public in the
State of . � ��,' 4 , County of -1 V
do hereby certify that :- , personally appeared
�
C
before me this the day of ,� '20:1- J , and acknowledge
the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAI.
Signature
Ft JOJ��s,,,
My Commission expires
PUB�'\G '12
ON COv
Form DRPC-3 Rev.2 05Nov2009 Page 2 of 2
4AIJJ9 Qu aH T y
Vl,.i1
P r _._ -_ -toil 0;
Form DRPC-3 Rev.2 05Nov2009 Page 2 of 2
4AIJJ9 Qu aH T y

Operation & Maintenance Agreement
CREEKS LANDING SUBDIVISION
Union County, NC UNION County 57'p�Wi4TErt J°'E�ero�F
Prepared By: Matthew G. Velkovich, P.E., Summit Land Services, PC l% O
Cover Paste
Maintenance records shall be kept on the following BMP(s). This maintenance record shall be kept in a log in a known set location. Any
deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired, or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity
of structures, safety of the public, and the pollutant removal efficiency of the BMP(s).
The BMP(s) on this project include (check all that apply & correspond
Bioretention Cell
Quantity:
Dry Detention Basin
Quantity:
Grassed Swale
Quantity:
Green Roof
Quantity:
Infiltration Basin
Quantity:
Infiltration Trench
Quantity:
Level SpreaderNFS
Quantity:
Permeable Pavement
Quantity:
Proprietary System
Quantity:
Rainwater Harvesting
Quantity:
Sand Filter
Quantity:
Stormwater Wetland
Quantity:
Wet Detention Basin
Quantity:
Disconnected Impervious Area
Present:
'
Soil Amendments
Present:
O&M tables will be added automaticai
Location(s): F
Pond #1
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s):
Location(s): Wet Pond #1
Location(s):
Location(s):
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed for each BMP
above, and attached O&M tables. I agree to notify NCDENR of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or
responsible party.
Si
County
persona
acknowledge the due execution of th Operations an t ce greement .
Witness my hand and official seal,
R 104cc";'s,
OSAR
'V
--_
Sea! �i��N•,IN„""M��. My commission expires
STORM -EZ 1011/15
Version 1 4 O&M Manual Pane 1 of 8

Important maintenance procedures
The drainage area will be managed to reduce the sediment load to the dry extended detention basin.
Immediately after the dry extended detention basin is established, the vegetation will be watered twice weekly if needed until the
plants become established (commonly six weeks).
No portion of the dry extended detention pond will be fertilized after the first initial fertilization that is required to establish the
vegetation.
The vegetation in and around the basin will be maintained at a height of approximately six inches.
If cracks, seepage, or woody vegetation is present, consult a dam safety expert for a dam inspection.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate depth reading and not readily
penetrate into accumulated sediments.
After the dry detention basin is established, it will be inspected quarterly. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows and any problems
identified will be remediated immediately per the table below.
BMP element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the BMP
Areas of bare soil and/or erosive
Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, and then plant a ground
gullies have formed.
cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Vegetation is too short or too
Maintain vegetation at a height of approximately six inches.
long.
The inlet device
The pipe is clogged.
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The pipe is cracked or otherwise
Replace the pipe.
damaged.
Erosion is occurring in the swale.
Regrade the swale if necessary to smooth it over and provide erosion control
devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future problems
with erosion.
Stone verge is clogged or
Remove sediment and replace with clean stone.
covered in sediment (if
applicable).
The forebay
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
Erosion has occurred or riprap is
Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or riprap
displaced,
if needed to prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticides are used, wipe them
on the plants rather than spraying.
STORM -EZ 10/1/15
Verminn 1 4 O&M Manual Pane 2 of 8

Dry Detention Pond Maintenance Requirements (continued)
BMP element:
Potential problem:
How to remediate the problem:
The main treatment area
Sediment has accumulated and
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if possible.
reduced the depth to 75% of the
Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a location where it will not cause
original design depth (per pond
impacts to streams or the BMP. Revegetate disturbed areas immediately
design data sheet)
with sod (preferred) or seed protected with securely staked erosion mat.
Water is standing more than 5
Check outlet structure for clogging. If it is a design issue, consult an
days after a storm event.
appropriate professional.
Weeds and noxious plants are
Remove the plants by hand or by wiping them with pesticide (do not spray).
growing in the main treatment
area.
The embankment
Shrubs or trees have started to
Remove shrubs or trees immediately.
grow on the embankment.
Grass cover is unhealthy or
Restore the health of the grass cover — consult a professional if necessary.
eroding.
Signs of seepage on the
Consult a professional.
downstream face.
Evidence of muskrat or beaver
Use traps to remove muskrats and consult a professional to remove beavers.
activity is present.
An annual inspection by an
Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional shows
that the embankment needs
renair
The outlet device
Clogging has occurred.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The outlet device is damaged
Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the local NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
damage have occurred at the
Regional Office.
outlet.
STORM -EZ 10/1/15
Version 1 4 O&M Manual Pane 3 of 8

Dry D+atention Pond Design Summary':
DRY POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
1
Temporary Pool EI:
622.3
Temporary Pool EI:
622.3
Clean out depth:
1.65
Clean out depth
1.65
Pretreatment Yes
Sediment Storage EI:
620.65
Sediment Storage EI:
620.65
F619
Has Veg. Filter Yes
Bottom EI:
619
Bottom EI:
DRY POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
2 -�
Temporary Pool EI:
614.9
Temporary Pool EI:
614.9
Clean out depth:
1.45
Clean out depth:
1.45
Pretreatment Yes
Sediment Storage EI:
3.45 Sediment Storage EI:
�61
613.45
Has Veg. Filter Yes
Bottom EI:
612
Bottom El:
612
DRY POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
3
Temporary Pool EI
577.5
Temporary Pool EI:
577.5
Clean out depth:
2.25
Clean out depth:
2.25
Pretreatment Yes
Sediment Storage EI:
575.25
F573
Sediment Storage EI:
575.25
Has Veg. Filter Yes
Bottom EI:
Bottom EI:
573
DRY POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
4
Temporary Pool EI:
592.4
Temporary Pool El:
592.4
Clean out depth:
3.2
Clean out depth:
3.2
Pretreatment Yes
Sediment Storage El:
589.2
Sediment Storage EI:
589.2
Has Veg. Filter Yes
Bottom EI:
586
Bottom EI:
586
DRY POND ID
FOREBAY
MAIN POND
5
Temporary Pool EI:
581.2
Temporary Pool EI:
581.2
Clean out depth:
3.1
Clean out depth:
3.1
Pretreatment Yes
Sediment Storage El:
578.1
Sediment Storage El:
578.1
Has Veg Filter Yes
Bottom EI:
575
Bottom El:
575
STORM -EZ 10/1/15
Version 1 4 O&M Manual Pane 4 of 8

r
- t... msrX77, _, �
n.
The wet detention basin system is defined as the wet detention basin, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if one is
provided.
Important maintenance procedures
Immediately after the wet detention basin is established, the plants on the vegetated shelf and perimeter of the basin
should be watered twice weekly if needed, until the plants become established (commonly six weeks).
No portion of the wet detention pond should be fertilized after the first initial fertilization that is required to establish the
plants on the vegetated shelf.
- Stable groundcover should be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the sediment load to the wet detention basin.
If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the Flushing of sediment through the emergency
drain should be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
Once a year, a dam safety expert should inspect the embankment.
After the wet detention pond is established, it should be inspected once a month and within 24 hours after every storm event greater than
1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance should be kept in a known set location and must
be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potential problem:
How I will remediate the problem:
The entire BMP
Trash/debris is present.
Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the BMP
Areas of bare soil and/or erosive
Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, and then plant a ground
gullies have formed.
cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Vegetation is too short or too
Maintain vegetation at a height of approximately six inches.
long.
The inlet device
The pipe is clogged.
Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The pipe is cracked or otherwise
Replace the pipe.
damaged.
Erosion is occurring in the swale.
Regrade the swale if necessary to smooth it over and provide erosion control
devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future problems
with erosion.
Stone verge is clogged or
Remove sediment and replace with clean stone.
covered in sediment (if
applicable).
The forebay
Sediment has accumulated to a
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if possible.
depth greater than the original
Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a location where it will not cause
design depth for sediment
impacts to streams or the BMP.
storage.
Erosion has occurred.
Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or riprap
if needed to prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used, wipe it on the
plants rather than spraying.
The vegetated shelf
Best professional practices show
Prune according to best professional practices
that pruning is needed to
maintain optimal plant health.
Plants are dead, diseased or
Determine the source of the problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc.
dying.
Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one-time fertilizer
application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is
necessary.
Weeds are present.
Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used, wipe it on the
plants rather than spraying.
STORM -EZ 1011/15
Version 1 4 O&M Manual Pace 5 of 8

Wet Detention Pond. Maintiaiiarteenru ntnntaC+ Hued) °.
The main treatment area
Sediment has accumulated to a
Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if possible.
depth greater than the original
Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a location where it will not cause
design sediment storage depth.
impacts to streams or the BMP.
Algal growth covers over 50% of
Consult a professional to remove and control the algal growth.
the area.
Cattails, phragmites or other
Remove the plants by wiping them with pesticide (do not spray).
invasive plants cover 50% of the
basin surface.
The embankment
Shrubs have started to grow on
Remove shrubs immediately.
the embankment.
Evidence of muskrat or beaver
Use traps to remove muskrats and consult a professional to remove beavers.
activity is present.
A tree has started to grow on the
Consult a dam safety specialist to remove the tree.
embankment.
An annual inspection by an
Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional shows
that the embankment needs
repair. if applicable)
The outlet device
Clogging has occurred.
Clean out the outlet device. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The outlet device is damaged
Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water
Erosion or other signs of
Contact the local NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
damage have occurred at the
Regional Office.
outlet.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate depth reading and not readily
penetrate into accumulated sediments.
STORM -EZ 10/1/15
Version 1 4 O&M Manual Paas 6 of 8

Wet Detention Pond Design Summary
WET POND ID FOREBAY MAIN POND
6
Normal Pool EI.
593.5
Normal Pool EI.
593.5
Temporary Pool EI:
597.75
Temporary Pool EI:
597.75
Pretreatment other
Clean out depth:
1.58
Clean out depth:
2.12
No
than forebay?
Sediment Storage EI
591.58
Sediment Storage EI:
590.12
Has Veg. Filter? Yes
Bottom EI:
590
Bottom El:
589
STORM -EZ 10/1/15
VPrtion 1 4 O&M Manual PaoP 7 of 8

`. ©ascot= ted"t111itie,nr ous AriatWAMffi-aga=Req[ii sirilAnC� " '.,
_,
Important operation and maintenance procedures:
The roof area will be maintained to reduce the debris and sediment load to the system. Excess debris can clog the
system and lead to bypass of the design storm, and reduced infiltration and pollutant removal.
To ensure proper operation as designed, a licensed Professional Engineer, Landscape Architect, or other qualified
professional will inspect the system annually.
- The system components will be repaired or replaced whenever they fail to function properly.
The system will be visually inspected by the owner/operator at least quarterly. Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known
set location and will be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately.
BMP element:
Potentialproblem:
How to remediate the problem:
The captured impervious
Excess debris or sediment is
Remove the debris or sediment as soon as possible.
area
present on the rooftop or
The gutter system (if
Gutters are clogged, or water is
Unclog and remove debris. May need to install gutter screens to prevent
applicable)
backing up out of the gutter
future clogging.
system.
Rooftop runoff not making it into
Correct the positioning or installation of gutters. Replace if necessary to
gutter system.
capture the roof runoff.
Rooftop runoff causing erosion
Install or repair splash blocks as needed.
at outlet.
Roadways & parking lots (if
Runoff Flows to the pervious area
Remove any sediment or obstructuions at the edge of the impervious area,
applicable)
as concentrated flow.
repair gravel verge
Energy dissipaters are unever
Repair or replace energy dissipater.
settled, undercut, eroded or
otherwise damaged.
The pervious area
Erosion is evident
Repair the eroded area and stabilize immediately.
There is erosion around the end
Regrade the soil to create a small berm, and then plant turf grass and water
of the pervious area that shows
until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer application.
stormwater has bypassed it.
Unintended trees or shrubs have
Remove them and re-establish vegetation per the original landscaping plan.
begun to grow in the pervious
area.
Areas of bare soil and/or erosive
Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, and then plant with turf
gullies have formed.
grass and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer
application.
Standing water is present 24
Fill shallow depressions with topsoul and seed mix. Regrade the area as
hours after rainfall.
necessary to reestablish sheet flow across the pervious area.
Vegetation is too long.
Maintain vegetation at a height of approximately 2 to 6 inches.
Property Owner Participation
Homeowners have re-routed
Provide educational materials to homeowners, and contact neighborhood
gutters or otherwise altered the
HOA.
system in a manner which
adversely impacts performance.
STORM -EZ 1011115
Versinn 1.4 O&M Manual Pane 8 of 8

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
RECEIVED JAN ~7 2016
January 5, 2016
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS
AND PERFORMANCE RESERVATIONS
Carolina Development Services, LLC
Attention: David Cuthbertson, Manager
2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
RE: Project Name: Creek's Landing Subdivision
Acres Approved: 87.55
Project ID: UNION -2015-110
County: Union, City: Sandy Ridge
Address: Weddington Road
River Basin: Catawba
Stream Classification: Other
Submitted By: Carolina Development Services, LLC
Date Received by LQS: December 22, 2015
Plan Type: Revised
Dear Mr. Cuthbertson:
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
Director
This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan and hereby issues
this Letter of Approval with Modifications and Performance Reservations. A list of the
modifications and reservations is attached. This plan approval shall expire three (3) years
following the date of approval, if no land -disturbing activity has been undertaken, as is required
by Title 15A NCAC 4B .0129. Should the plan not perform adequately, a revised plan will be
required (G.S. 113A -54.1)(b).
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES Construction
Stormwater General Permit NCG010000. Please become familiar with all the requirements and
conditions of this permit in order to achieve compliance.
Please be advised that Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) requires that a copy of the approved erosion
control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter to give the Notice
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Mooresville, Regional Office I 610 East Center Ave Ste 301 I Mooresville, AIC 28115
704 663 1699 T

Letter of Approval with Modifications and Performance Reservations
Carolina Development Services, LLC
January 5, 2016
Page 2 of 3
required by G.S. 113A -61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with the
approved plan.
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is performance -oriented, requiring
protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the
commencement of this project, it is determined that the erosion and sedimentation control plan is
inadequate to meet the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North
Carolina General Statute 113A-51 thru 66), this office may require revisions to the plan and
implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and
State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. In addition, local city or county ordinances or
rules may also apply to this land -disturbing activity. This approval does not supersede any other
permit or approval.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form, which you have provided. You are requested to file an amended
form if there is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be
helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Please notify us if
you plan to have a preconstruction conference.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Tamera Epl' E, CPESC
Assistant R oral Engineer
Land Quality Section
THE
Enclosures: Certificate of Plan Approval
Modifications and Performance Reservations
NPDES Permit
c: Matthew Velkovich, PE, Summit Land Services, PO Box 7442, Charlotte, NC 28241
Inspection Department

Letter of Approval with Modifications and Performance Reservations
Carolina Development Services, LLC
January 5, 2016
Page 3 of 3
MODIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE RESERVATIONS
Project Name: Creek's Landing Subdivision
Project ID: UNION -2015-110
County: Union
Modifications pursuant to applicable North Carolina General Statutes and/or Regulations:
1. All potentially affected property owners must be notified prior to construction even though
the activity is covered under an easement. Copies of landowner -builder or access agreements
must be submitted to this office prior to any utility construction, general construction or
access onto lands not covered by permanent easement. [G.S. 113A -54.1(a1)]
Performance Reservations:
Additional measures may be required - The applicant is responsible for the control of
sediment on-site. If the approved erosion and sedimentation control measures prove
insufficient, the applicant must take those additional steps necessary to stop sediment from
leaving this site. [15A NCAC 4B .0115]
Additional Comments:
1. This plan approval is for mass grade/installation of infrastructure only. Any homebuilder
other than Carolina Development Services, LLC is required to obtain an independent erosion
control plan approval, subject to requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of
1973 & Associated Rules.

CERTIFICATE OF PLAN APPROVAL
The posting of this certificate certifies that an erosion and sedimentation control plan has been
approved for this project by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 113A -- 57 (4) and 113A — 54 (d) (4) and
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter 4B.0107 (c). This certificate must be
posted at the primary entrance of the job site before construction begins and until establishment of
permanent groundcover as required by North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter
4B.0127 (b).
S
e"Ilh-Xy�5 mal
Date of Plan Ap roval
W1 Inhb 1r*64-T16A(J
VlJlh.N
79W
Project Name and Location
A144urn
NCDENR
&A41A17Y
lopS-r,40 Regional Engineer

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
January 12, 2015
Mr. Alan Johnson
NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
9`I' Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Stream Relocation Plan
Creek's Landing (DWR #15-1170)
Union Co., North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Dear Mr. Johnson:
The Creek's Landing site is approximately 135 acres in extent and is located south from the intersection of
Weddington Road and Airport Road in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of
this project is to develop a residential subdivision in a developing area of Union County, North Carolina.
Carolina Development Services, LLC, has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. Per a condition set forth in the issued 401 Water
Quality Certification (DWR # 15-1170, attached), a stream relocation plan is necessary to be approved by
your office prior to commencing the impacts proposed for the project.
Applicant Name: Carolina Development Services; POC: Mr. Johnathan McCall
Mailing Address: 6707 Fairview Road, Suite B, Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-401-7185
Street Address of Project: south from the intersection of Weddington Road and Airport Road in
Union County, North Carolina
Waterway: UTs to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
Basin: Catawba (HUC 03040103)
City: Union County Incorporated
County: Union
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 060-030-23, 060-060-12, and 060-030-15
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.001359°, -80. 655074°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Matthews, NC (1988) and Waxhaw, NC (1986)
Site Conditions
The project area consists mostly of forested land and open fields (Figure 2, attached). Typical on-site
vegetation includes willow oak (Quecus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styrac f ua), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), winged elm (Ulmus alata), red maple (Acer rubrum), mockemut hickory (Cwya
tomentosa), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), sawtooth blackberry (Rubes argutus), greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), and muscadine (Vitis roduntifolia).
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Purpose and Need for the Stream Relocation
There are eight jurisdictional seasonal RPW stream channels (Streams A -H) and four jurisdictional
wetlands (Wetlands AA -DD) located within the project area (Figure 3, attached). On -Site streams are
unnamed tributaries to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek. The purpose of the project is to develop
approximately 35 acres of the 48 acre property into a single-family subdivision consisting of 68 lots
(Figures 4, attached). This will result in impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
The original plan for the proposed road crossing was a piped conveyance instead of the currently proposed
culvert (Figure 5, attached). This original plan included a 1531f, 30 -inch, "L" -shaped reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) with a 151f rip rap apron at the outlet. Permanent impacts associated with this design totaled
167 linear feet of Stream B.
In order to reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., a straight culvert with stream relocation was
chosen in lieu of a piped conveyance (Figures 6 and 7, attached). A straight culvert is the favored design as
it will maintain aquatic life passage, is easier to maintain, and has a lower potential to clog versus a piped
conveyance. Permanent impacts associated with this culvert installation total 1091f of Stream B. Due to a
an extreme bend in Stream B, 125 linear feet of temporary impacts is proposed for relocation This
relocation will allow for the culvert to be aligned with downstream waters at the outlet, but creates a
loss of 151f during the relocation of the existing stream to the relocated stream (Stream 7, attached).
In order to maintain minimal impacts, the proposed impacts to Stream B total 249 If, consisting of 109
If of permanent impacts (culvert installation), 125 linear feet of temporary impacts (relocation), and a
15 If net loss (from existing to relocated). Impacts are summarized in Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of proposed impacts.
Jurisdictional
Impact
Temporary
Impacts
Feature
Type
or
(linear feet)
Impacts (acre)
Permanent
Road Crossing (Culvert)
Permanent
109
0.01
Stream B
Stream relocation
Temporary
125
0.01
Stream relocation (net
permanent
15
0.00
loss of waters
Total Permanent Stream Impacts
124
0.01 acre
Total Temporary Stream Impacts
125
0.01 acre
Total Stream Impacts
2491f
0.02 acre
The proposed culvert is a 100 -linear foot, 30 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with headwalls at
both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried at least six inches below
the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. Impacts associated with
the straight culvert design were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlet and outlet of the proposed
culvert in order to minimize the length required for the proposed crossing. The proposed culvert is also
designed to maintain bankfull channel dimensions upstream and downstream of the proposed culvert.
In -stream structures will provide stabilization and prevent upstream incision, as necessary. Natural
coconut matting, riparian seed, and native plants will be installed on both sides of the relocated Stream
B for bank stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation species will be chosen to fit in with the
existing plant community, as well as add diversity, particularly in the riparian zone. Currently, much
of the riparian area is dominated by invasive Chinese privet. Chinese privet and other invasive species
such as Japanese honeysuckle will be removed and/or treated.

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
All channel work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No.
3890. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters.
Methods
A geomorphic survey was performed by CWS scientists Kelly Thames, Wetland Professional in
Training (WPIT), Kaitlin McCulloch, Staff Scientist 1, and Ben McGuire, Staff Scientist I on
December 28, 2015. This assessment included a longitudinal profile and representative cross sections
of the existing stream channel (Figures 8 — 11, attached). Due to the extreme bend in Stream B, the
relocation is necessary in order to align the proposed culvert with downstream waters. The stream
relocation plan proposes for Stream B to exit the proposed culvert and flow for a relocated 125 if to a
logical tie-in point downstream. This plan ultimately reduces permanent stream impacts from 2491f to
1241f.
Stream B exhibits stable characteristics and was determined a good reference reach to survey for the
relocated design. A longitudinal profile and cross sectional surveys were performed on a
representative riffle and a representative pool feature (Figures 9 — 11, attached). The average drainage
area for Stream B is approximately 0.064 square miles (41.16 acres), channel slope averages 0.018
ft/ft, and sinuosity is 1.17 ft/ft. Bankfull width and mean depth for this reach are 4.92 feet and 0.39
feet, respectively, with a bankfull area of 1.91 sq. ft. and width/depth ratio of 12.66. The flood prone
width for this reach is 10 feet and greater. Application of Rosgen Level II Stream Classification to a
representative riffle section identified Stream B as a C type channel (Table 2, below).
Stream Desijn
CWS developed a stream design for the relocation of Stream B downstream of the culvert installation
based on existing channel conditions (Figure 7, attached). This design will improve the goals of the
project and enhance future water quality by adding sinuosity to reduce sheer stress, increasing the
quality of epifaunal substrate, and enhancing the buffer with native riparian plantings. The old
channel will be filled and planted. Typical cross sectional dimensions for the relocation will be based
on the existing cross sectional dimensions (Figure 12, attached). A longitudinal profile was developed
for the relocation to exit the proposed culvert and tie-in to the existing channel at a logical downstream
location (Figure 13, attached).

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Table 2. Summary of Existing and Design Stream Conditions
Parameter
Existing
Proposed
Riffle
Proposed
Pool
Length of Evaluated (ft.)
352
125
Channel Dimensions
Bankfull Width (ft.)
4.92
5
5
Mean Bankfull Depth (ft.)
0.39
0.39
0.70
Width/Depth Ratio
12.66
12.66
5.87
Bankfull Area (sq. ft.)
1.91
1.91
2.86
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft.)
0.76
0.76
1.17
Width Floodprone Area (ft.)
>10
>10
>10
Entrenchment Ratio
2.13
2.13
7.32
Channel Pattern
Sinuosity
1.17
1.21
Channel Profile
Channel Slope
0.018
0.035
Rosgen Stream Type
C
C
CWS will utilize a pump around to work in the dry and apply other erosion and sediment control
techniques to minimize sediment escape from the site during construction. These techniques include
employing coir fiber logs within the channel bed immediately downstream of the construction area.
These logs are meant to temporarily prevent downstream sediment migration and will be removed
once the channel has been stabilized with matting.
The relocated channel reach is designed to have profile and dimension similar to the upstream reach,
however it has been designed with added sinuosity. The restored stream will have similar channel
stability and dimensions to the original channel, as well as provide an uplift of aquatic function by
providing a higher quality riparian buffer through planting native plants and controlling invasive plant
species. The improvements to the relocated stream are designed to minimize erosion, downstream
sediment accumulation, and downstream scouring by redirecting flow and reducing sheer stress.
Planting Plan
Natural coconut matting (coir matting), native seed mix, live stakes, and native plants will be installed
on both sides of Stream B in various zones for bank stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation
species will be chosen based on the existing plant community and to add species diversity, particularly
in the riparian zone.
Stream banks consist of three zones: 1) lower stream banks, 2) upper stream banks, and 3) riparian
buffer (Figure 14, attached). Revegetation of the area directly adjacent to the relocated channel is
especially important to prevent erosion, downstream sedimentation, and provides important water
quality and habitat services. Wetland plant species such as silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), river
birch (Betula nigra), black willow (Salix nigra), and soft rush (Juncus effusus) will be planted on the
lower stream banks (Zone 1, approximately 506 square feet [sf]). Black willow and clusters of soft
rush will be planted on outside stream bends for dense rooting and erosion control. Upper stream
banks (Zone 2, approximately 782 sf) will be planted with other moisture -tolerant species such as
green ash and red maple. The riparian buffer (Zone 3, approximately 9,474 sf) will be planted with
4

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
species such as ironwood, slippery elm, and spicebush (Lindera benzoin). All disturbed areas will be
seeded with temporary and permanent native riparian and wetland seed mixes, and stream banks will
be matted with natural coconut matting. Planting plan details are summarized in Table 3 (below) and
Figure 13 (attached).
Table 3. Proposed Planting Plan, Old Blair's Mill Stream Relocation Project
Zone 1 - Lower Stream Banks (506 sq ft
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
Soft rush
Juncus effusus
Plug
3' O.C.
100
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Live stake
T O.C.
45
Black willow
Salix nigra
Live stake
T O.C.
45
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
Live Stake
T O.C.
45
Zone 2 - Upper Stream Banks (782 sq ft)
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Bare root
T O.C.
20
River birch
Betula nigra
Bare root
4' O.C.
20
Red maple
Acer rubrum
Bare root
4' O.C.
20
Zone 3 - Riparian Buffer 9,474 sq ft
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
S icebush
Lindera benzoin
One Gallon
8' O.C.
148
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Red maple
Acer rubrum
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Slippery elm
Ulmus rubra
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
On behalf of Carolina Development Services, CWS is submitting this stream relocation plan in order
to satisfy the conditions required by the Section 401 Water Quality Certification.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-408-1683, or through email at [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Aur, c- . Ah—X ,—
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist
WET
V.
S147P NO.W iyZZ
:tel
fa� '''x'Cl/
Kelly Thames, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 4. Overall Site Plan
Figure 5. Originally Proposed Impacts
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts Overview
Figure 7. Proposed Stream Relocation Plan
Figure 8. Geomorphic Survey Overview
Figure 9. Existing Cross Section - Pool
Figure 10. Existing Cross Section - Riffle
Figure 11. Existing Longitudinal Profile
Figure 12. Typical Cross Section
Figure 13. Proposed Longitudinal Profile
Figure 14. Planting Plan
401 Water Quality Certification (DWR # 15-1170)
cc: Mr. Johnathan McCall, Carolina Development Services

l�
SUMMIT
CHARLOTTE,
SERVICES, 7442 NC 28211
ww P.0
62-8.1
Dn a
C-Laet11S I� - /Y / 1 • .`4• POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
�1
NGS MONUMENT
6$3522 E GRID
0 NCL
00RD5.(NA063 2011)
N(Y) 473,3 ¢
MH j I h / J �. • Q�• RASWE
2 q 6.86 TFT
POND 1
) E(%) 1,519,684.02 TFT ZO
E / I 5
• �^ �f � � \ \ ~ \ \'.. ✓`�[1' �1 X34..�� ; 35
/ r \ \ i i I ,TRACT 11 -`f�� 13131 1 37 f \\
158 159 160 161 162 163 164 !' 11- 960-030-15 3 1 1 � Q 38 \
7' _ wF 1 _ PHA
UNE 157 166 -� �,, y • fiy W -00 -cm 2A895 Aass 39
j \ _ _ m "' ,NiES F ! 975 9/_ _ _ 1 q0 \
(/FIST ILEOCREEK ice- - / - - _ _ ❑ ❑ O/ , q J V6 l �• I� 03 4�1 - SE . r \ �a
` V POND 2= d" • 38g. \ 4 +�
168 �1
32 \ a
��a I ✓ / \O GT !!l_-- , 1v/�wF • T 1 1 \135 \ / Yc a
0-030-23
es
E POND 3 \ //155 154 A Aa\35 16s6
2 0o
19802' 201 200 199 \\ 170 228 126 sf �' • 1 1 lP/aerna �, 1 IGl 134 \1 \
� z , 30
171 N N/% 1 MND P! 1
N ac�aao a emus 7 1
Y
w smLaNr 11 tIe rau PD Jsa ^^p t 133 1 1 I
172. � N• PAAIEP f
�
I 196 \ O i� i ant PD 7A ` t
ibnnnm
lilvlllll
I , 60 try
\\ 84 86 2 4H
265 26490 x`95 .. \•. �a � I �1 132
1 J�
\ - - 91
92
: � ^ 81/ n 9 76
0 77
7` 5,' \ \ \� 94
pf-0017-IJf ls. \ 74, \ 9E
OB IeRT PG.W 3 �
..�
/ \ LOFJ7 LOT X L LOT U6 ` L�r J1
\ PNASE Y YAP ! int 72
(Ne N PD !J � ✓J
_ LOT JO 71
70✓
^\
^ Lm E 9
w
F_
�yL� \
Z 67,
g= t Cj, LOT
Lar 25
- - ' LaT
m -F.
sow LosRl
\�!
LOTH
aid°W ow - Seo L07
u8�i¢ojao aug PDT1.
w ggR o18
°�yga °mt
�z°�,aa�E:oa�,a�iEo w
Project Limits
< NIP N
�Xaau W ac
W am PD eP7
48 47 \t
52 51 50 49 \
I 53 i
F,01
'ROPERTY LINELM
EEK TRI _
V FOR ELVE1
� CREEK TRIBUTA
I i CURVE ARC LE f1ADN DELTA AN CHORD BEARING CHORp LENGTH70
W f�
131, I/A'� i 259,95N� 523.D05 28°22'll'GLE 533°36'28" W 25].30' U U
130
%. , l O
i 129 I ► c CFS Z f OZ o
5
128 OW�OLO-iNi
HSW FO y F
AAY.q ® W
� J / 1Cp
24 ��-�� 1' I i! IMDRSgY LLO p py
_ ( w r-
' 121
f23 I ^ o
126 1 '/ O PROJECT.
L22
J 125 11 `-------
1 44
,20 123 A19
\;�
11 122
A
1119 120 ( \ / / �\., - ------ Q
La pq
, 44
46 z
Cn
POND 6
FARAM OSN
FNr15 LLC
ow FG 1`02SHEET'
f�/ice �i
LLJ
.w — Z
W
TM St;a'! 1(' 3GVLh; O
W ODns PD 0503
RIG. PROJ. DATE 06-01-201`
SCALE 1"=150'
25'x25' SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25' SIGHT TRIANGLE - `' DRAWN BY RJC
10x70' SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70SIGHT DISTANCE CHECKED By MG7
��....... FIG.
-- -- - —
r ose Impacts Overview
W
_ _op
i,.
F�c��S'�A 2
3 TOf N g1'51'3�� E
',i° C/0 522.25'
♦ ..
�.�` I _
_ I
(//
X07
\ (' L106 °
7 •
o �y
m PD 30
1 /
l�
SUMMIT
CHARLOTTE,
SERVICES, 7442 NC 28211
ww P.0
62-8.1
Dn a
C-Laet11S I� - /Y / 1 • .`4• POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
�1
NGS MONUMENT
6$3522 E GRID
0 NCL
00RD5.(NA063 2011)
N(Y) 473,3 ¢
MH j I h / J �. • Q�• RASWE
2 q 6.86 TFT
POND 1
) E(%) 1,519,684.02 TFT ZO
E / I 5
• �^ �f � � \ \ ~ \ \'.. ✓`�[1' �1 X34..�� ; 35
/ r \ \ i i I ,TRACT 11 -`f�� 13131 1 37 f \\
158 159 160 161 162 163 164 !' 11- 960-030-15 3 1 1 � Q 38 \
7' _ wF 1 _ PHA
UNE 157 166 -� �,, y • fiy W -00 -cm 2A895 Aass 39
j \ _ _ m "' ,NiES F ! 975 9/_ _ _ 1 q0 \
(/FIST ILEOCREEK ice- - / - - _ _ ❑ ❑ O/ , q J V6 l �• I� 03 4�1 - SE . r \ �a
` V POND 2= d" • 38g. \ 4 +�
168 �1
32 \ a
��a I ✓ / \O GT !!l_-- , 1v/�wF • T 1 1 \135 \ / Yc a
0-030-23
es
E POND 3 \ //155 154 A Aa\35 16s6
2 0o
19802' 201 200 199 \\ 170 228 126 sf �' • 1 1 lP/aerna �, 1 IGl 134 \1 \
� z , 30
171 N N/% 1 MND P! 1
N ac�aao a emus 7 1
Y
w smLaNr 11 tIe rau PD Jsa ^^p t 133 1 1 I
172. � N• PAAIEP f
�
I 196 \ O i� i ant PD 7A ` t
ibnnnm
lilvlllll
I , 60 try
\\ 84 86 2 4H
265 26490 x`95 .. \•. �a � I �1 132
1 J�
\ - - 91
92
: � ^ 81/ n 9 76
0 77
7` 5,' \ \ \� 94
pf-0017-IJf ls. \ 74, \ 9E
OB IeRT PG.W 3 �
..�
/ \ LOFJ7 LOT X L LOT U6 ` L�r J1
\ PNASE Y YAP ! int 72
(Ne N PD !J � ✓J
_ LOT JO 71
70✓
^\
^ Lm E 9
w
F_
�yL� \
Z 67,
g= t Cj, LOT
Lar 25
- - ' LaT
m -F.
sow LosRl
\�!
LOTH
aid°W ow - Seo L07
u8�i¢ojao aug PDT1.
w ggR o18
°�yga °mt
�z°�,aa�E:oa�,a�iEo w
Project Limits
< NIP N
�Xaau W ac
W am PD eP7
48 47 \t
52 51 50 49 \
I 53 i
F,01
'ROPERTY LINELM
EEK TRI _
V FOR ELVE1
� CREEK TRIBUTA
I i CURVE ARC LE f1ADN DELTA AN CHORD BEARING CHORp LENGTH70
W f�
131, I/A'� i 259,95N� 523.D05 28°22'll'GLE 533°36'28" W 25].30' U U
130
%. , l O
i 129 I ► c CFS Z f OZ o
5
128 OW�OLO-iNi
HSW FO y F
AAY.q ® W
� J / 1Cp
24 ��-�� 1' I i! IMDRSgY LLO p py
_ ( w r-
' 121
f23 I ^ o
126 1 '/ O PROJECT.
L22
J 125 11 `-------
1 44
,20 123 A19
\;�
11 122
A
1119 120 ( \ / / �\., - ------ Q
La pq
, 44
46 z
Cn
POND 6
FARAM OSN
FNr15 LLC
ow FG 1`02SHEET'
f�/ice �i
LLJ
.w — Z
W
TM St;a'! 1(' 3GVLh; O
W ODns PD 0503
RIG. PROJ. DATE 06-01-201`
SCALE 1"=150'
25'x25' SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25' SIGHT TRIANGLE - `' DRAWN BY RJC
10x70' SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70SIGHT DISTANCE CHECKED By MG7
��....... FIG.
I , 60 try
\\ 84 86 2 4H
265 26490 x`95 .. \•. �a � I �1 132
1 J�
\ - - 91
92
: � ^ 81/ n 9 76
0 77
7` 5,' \ \ \� 94
pf-0017-IJf ls. \ 74, \ 9E
OB IeRT PG.W 3 �
..�
/ \ LOFJ7 LOT X L LOT U6 ` L�r J1
\ PNASE Y YAP ! int 72
(Ne N PD !J � ✓J
_ LOT JO 71
70✓
^\
^ Lm E 9
w
F_
�yL� \
Z 67,
g= t Cj, LOT
Lar 25
- - ' LaT
m -F.
sow LosRl
\�!
LOTH
aid°W ow - Seo L07
u8�i¢ojao aug PDT1.
w ggR o18
°�yga °mt
�z°�,aa�E:oa�,a�iEo w
Project Limits
< NIP N
�Xaau W ac
W am PD eP7
48 47 \t
52 51 50 49 \
I 53 i
F,01
'ROPERTY LINELM
EEK TRI _
V FOR ELVE1
� CREEK TRIBUTA
I i CURVE ARC LE f1ADN DELTA AN CHORD BEARING CHORp LENGTH70
W f�
131, I/A'� i 259,95N� 523.D05 28°22'll'GLE 533°36'28" W 25].30' U U
130
%. , l O
i 129 I ► c CFS Z f OZ o
5
128 OW�OLO-iNi
HSW FO y F
AAY.q ® W
� J / 1Cp
24 ��-�� 1' I i! IMDRSgY LLO p py
_ ( w r-
' 121
f23 I ^ o
126 1 '/ O PROJECT.
L22
J 125 11 `-------
1 44
,20 123 A19
\;�
11 122
A
1119 120 ( \ / / �\., - ------ Q
La pq
, 44
46 z
Cn
POND 6
FARAM OSN
FNr15 LLC
ow FG 1`02SHEET'
f�/ice �i
LLJ
.w — Z
W
TM St;a'! 1(' 3GVLh; O
W ODns PD 0503
RIG. PROJ. DATE 06-01-201`
SCALE 1"=150'
25'x25' SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25' SIGHT TRIANGLE - `' DRAWN BY RJC
10x70' SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70SIGHT DISTANCE CHECKED By MG7
��....... FIG.

Seasonal RPW B
- 167 If permanent impacts (pipe)
153'30 -inch RCP piped conveyance
°
IJ
F °
°
°
l'
Alternative Plan View Figure
% Creek's Landing
Union Co., North Carolina 5
(' CWS Project No. 2015-3535

SD 1155-154 PROFILE
0+00 1+00 2+00
Proposed Impacts - Plan View and Profile
Legend
Proposed Culvert
Proposed Impact
�.�.... Proposed Steam Relocation
Proposed Relocated Stream
...... . Avoided Seasonal Stream
Avoided Perennial Stream
LEGEND
DETAIL DETAIL
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
9� 9�
PROPERTY LINE
— —
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
EXISTING NRB LINE
—
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
----'- -----
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
1
EXISTING MAIOR CONTOUR
722
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
720
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED R.C.P.
...
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
C
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
CD
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
GY,AP111C SCALL'
1 IA tGY'I
I nrh — Asn lr.
90MMR
m sEJmcE9,
x. o -91z9
/44&'
SUMMIT
ND SERVICES, P.0
I"......
9161
OFFlCE:)1212"1
W W W.SUMMRLOMPANIE9.COM
REVISIONS'
LJJ
CI)
z Q
Q z
� � z
z_ o Q
C� :2i El-
U)
Fig.
6

SCALE: 1" : 50'
DATE: 10-26-15
11
Proposed Stream Relocation
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
AVH
/
7
2015-3535
Creek's Landing
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
CAROLINA
Union Co., North Carolina
KMT
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535

590
589
588
0 587
586
w 585
584
0
Crngq ',�ectinn 1- Pool
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft.)
----- Bankf ill Width ----- Flood -Prone Width x Water Surface
Parameter
Existing Condition
Bankfull Width ft.
1.1
Mean Bankfull Depth ft.
0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
5.87
Bankfull Areas . ft.
2.86
Bankfull Maximum Depth ft.
1.17
Width of Floodprone Area ft.
> 33
Entrenchment Ratio
7.32
Sinuosity
1.17
Water Surface Slo aft./ft.
0.018
Ros en Stream Type
E
SCALE: n/a
DATE: 1-6-2016
Representative Cross Section - Pool
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO.
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
KMT
creeks Landing
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
CAROLINA
Monroe, North Carolina
9-
GCA
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535

Cross Section 2- Riffle
589
588
587
0
-----------------
--------
586
585
584
0 5 10 15 20
25 30 35
40
Station (ft.)
Bankfull Width — — - Flood -Prone
Width )— Water Surface
Parameter Existing Condition
Bankfull Width (ft.)
4.92
Mean Bankfull Depth (ft.)
0.39
Width/Depth Ratio
12.66
Bankfull Area (sq. ft.)
1.91
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft.)
0.76
Width of Floodprone Area (ft.)
10.47
Entrenchment Ratio
2.13
Sinuosity
1.17
Water Surface Slope (ft./ft.)
0.018
°Rosgen Stream Type
C
SCALE:
n/a
DATE :
1-6-2016
CAROLINA
Representative Cross Section - Riffle
l�l(iURk: ivc '.
/1 O
1
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
KMT15
Creek's Landing
Monroe, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-353
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY: GCA
WETLAND SERVICES

o•oo�
LL
"
O'SLZ m
1Jj
x
I
�'�Sz
CO
O'SZZ J
O'OOZ
LL
�
Y
m
'
0'SL T
�
a
O
"
p�
4o•osT
.01
o m
OBJ
O
�
. x
�
O'SZI
b�
O
�JO
00
. .
�
a
'
0.00I
��
Ou
�
0'SL
0'OS
o,
o�
a
a,
o0
0o
ao
00
00
00
M
00
N
0
rl
00
00
�
�
r
�O
r
�
�
(;aa�)
uo�;ueai�
a�
>F
�
�l
0'SZ
I
1
1
1,41
1
1
0'0
.1
_U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
. .
M
. .
N
O�
00
.
l�
.
�O In
.
IT
.
.
.
.
SCALE:
n/a
DATE:
1-6-2016
is
CAROLINA
Longitudinal Profile
FIGURE NO.
11
CW5 PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BV: KMT
Creek's Landing
Monroe, North Caro lina
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
GCA
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
o,
o�
a
a,
o0
0o
ao
00
00
00
M
00
N
0
rl
00
00
�
�
r
�O
r
�
�
(;aa�)
uo�;ueai�

Typical Cross Section
Bankfull width
6'
Bankfull Depth
0.76'
0 � 10 l? _'0
Distance (ft.)
--- - Bankhill Width
SCALE:
n/a
DATE:
1-6-2016
I
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Typical Cross Section
I"'"ISI` NO
12
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
KMT
Creek's Landing
Monroe, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
GCA
Typical Cross Section
Bankfull width
6'
Bankfull Depth
0.76'
0 � 10 l? _'0
Distance (ft.)
--- - Bankhill Width

V
N
r
C
iNa
m
Om
m
i
P
Cz
N
Wo
v,
Longitudinal Profile -Relocation
W
v,
593.0
592.0
591.0
--- -----
- --- -
S
m
X
S
D
o
m
�
590.0
-
N
589.0
D
i
o
rn
588.0
584.0
c
583.0
587.0
582.0
"-
586.0
• x
�
�
581.0
p
585.0
�
i
�
A A
580.0
-----
579.0
i
�
Z�
578.0
70
42,
577.0
n.
<Z
576.0
a
>
575.0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
O
N
N
N
N
N M
Station (feet)
Water Surface —�
Existing Thalweg RTOB LTOB -- RBKF
LBKF
— — —
Proposed Thalweg
t"
0
a
as
y,
a
Rz�
b
O Q b
O m G
N O 00
�C
No
0
w m
�
N
�
a
N
w x
0
584.0
c
583.0
582.0
"-
X
�
581.0
W
580.0
579.0
�
578.0
577.0
576.0
575.0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
O
N
N
N
N
N M
Station (feet)
Water Surface —�
Existing Thalweg RTOB LTOB -- RBKF
LBKF
— — —
Proposed Thalweg

Creek's Landing November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
M

Creek's Landing
November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Photograph E. View of Seasonal RPW C, facing upstream.
Photograph F. View of Seasonal RPW D, facing upstream.

Creek's Landing November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Photograph G. View of Seasonal RPW E, facing upstream.
Photograph H. View of Seasonal RPW F, facing upstream.
IV

Creek's Landing November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Photograph 1. View of Seasonal RPW G, facing upstream.
Photograph I2. View of Seasonal RPW G, facing downstream.

Creek's Landing November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Photograph J. View of Wetland AA, facing west.
Photograph K. View of Wetland BB, facing west.
VI

Creek's Landing November 3, 2015
Pre -Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WQC 3890 CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Photograph L. View of Wetland CC, facing north.
Photograph M. View of Wetland DD, facing north.
vu