20150470 Ver 1_401 Application_20150515

SINCE FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
8C 310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
1881 ® NC License #F -0266
TO: NC DWR
Attn: 1J 1"V%�� S w^ • `
We are sending you ❑ Attached
The Following Items:
❑ Engineering Reports
[]Test Reports
Date: 5 -4 -2015
F &R No.: 66S -0402
Reference: E -36 PCN
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter Plans
❑ Samples ❑ Contract Other: PCN
Copies
Date
No.
Description
4
PCN and site plans
C� F-
rn
z
NT -
N
Remarks:
Distribution:
Please contact Eli Ruhl at 919 - 828 -3431 with any questions.
Signed
(L] ­j
Corporate HQ:, 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, Virginia 23228 T804.264-2701 F 804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Minority -Owned Business
L-2na-7.7

310 Hubert St, Raleigh, NC 27603 to 3800 Barrett Dr, Raleigh, NC 27609 - Google Maps Page 1 of 2
Google
Directions from 310 Hubert St to 3800 Barrett Dr
:YE.
r
z
v m
3800 arret B S D za '
m Y b
OR!'v Carolina Country dub
t •4 ,.
At— Schenck ¢ tJ
ITkmarel forest
North Carolina ;; - S}YCresr Or. Er -"V arr
M— of An ` . ,.:.:r,
r "" me"', nra -
f;��
jAS
j PNC Arena': aOpeuue
Rd ONd, Me
g NCSIate Faire un'torcoay �13min t J
3 w
1011 .. =lark 4ve W Pe t St
-
WEStem &a
v ¢' North Carol - a z ppYlN *owk ° 5 ' t^
State Umversity ;yh,ei 3
o-a J z`
t Raleigh N wR rnA "e
rl
M Convenhtion Center
a
,, r v�gm � a ' � _ ffarynf uthrr Vl�q JrtO S 1
�vertGel.- /P IDDI '..�
Y North Cerollna T
' =L,p{ Slate University.. _ z°
/. ..H
ca° Lake JoMu Park t Hub dSt
Oi+ree0. GottCaiise "r; ,. 3 .+t
o 310 Hubert St
Raleigh, NC 27603
Head east on Hubert St toward S
t Saunders St
358 ft/ 16 s Cr
MAY 1 1 2015 '1'1
x-
Vnoon Church A. 'o
C, IF3,t Ave
t� S
° 1
oFastenal
Cause for P-
Thnfl Shop d ��
310 Hub tStO
-.€ •.eroasrftanvoke
T N a Super Trucks Plus
a
M ft Real Deal rlooling
N
�C
.off
Linda Hartmar
e mtimetes
Pen—, c D,
c�
I lo—v Co.pwalion'.
-:�
Take McDowell St and Capital Blvd to ria Carnlina G °entry Cl..b
Wake Forest Rd. Take the Wake Forest Rd
_ FVYr r2'n.� M 2' 0. '
N exit from Capital Blvd A-
Map data 02015 Google w a
https: / /www. google.comlmaps /dir/ 310 +Hubert +St, +Raleigh, +NC +27603/3 800 +Barrett +Dr,... 5/7/2015

310 Hubert St, Raleigh, NC 27603 to 3 800 Barrett Dr, Raleigh, NC 27609 - Google Maps Page 2 of 2
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction
projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause conditions to differ from the
map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or
notices regarding your route.
https:llwww.google.comlmapsldirl3lO+Hubert+St,+Raleigh,+NC+2760313800+Barrett+Dr,... 5/7/2015
3.8 mi / 8 min
A 13 min
*1
2. Turn left at the I st cross street onto S
4, , I
'Ialk A,' w `—
Saunders St
N nh C—fina
Slate University h—'44' st leigh
N­ Kerr: e. All
0.4 mi
3. Continue onto McDowell St
"I= h
r T—I
1.6 mi
4. Continue onto Capital Blvd
N.Oh C-fl-
o.".2"Ry"
1.4 mi
310 Hubert Si 0
L.n-r -wee
5. Take the Wake Forest Rd N exit
0.4 mi
Follow
Wake Forest Rd and E Six Forks
N":R ... ... s
Rd to Barrett Dr
+
6 DI
2.1 mi 5 min
Fmn a Y 3800 Barrett or
6. Continue Wake Forest
ti l
onto Rd
1.2 mi
Lb
7. Turn left onto E Six Forks Rd
---- 0.9 mi
8. Turn right onto Barrett Dr
Destination will be on the right
0.1 mi
O
3800 Barrett Dr
Raleigh, NC 2760()
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction
projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause conditions to differ from the
map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or
notices regarding your route.
https:llwww.google.comlmapsldirl3lO+Hubert+St,+Raleigh,+NC+2760313800+Barrett+Dr,... 5/7/2015

1
0 of WArF9 2
oG 0 .5 . Q 4 T O Office Use Only:
r Corps action ID no.
-i
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Con cF6 Fication (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 3890
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes Q No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program. -
❑ Yes 0 No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑Yes 0 No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Wake County Public School System ( WCPSS) Propo ary School
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A j 2(7
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A Qo NR. w
3. Owner Information FFCR PFR o-RC�s
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Wake County Board of Education c/o WCPSS Facilities, M.J. Desormea
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
015767 / 00087 -00091
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
1551 Rock Quarry Road, c/o FD &C
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27610
3f. Telephone no.:
919 - 856 -8247 IV 03 1 $ 1
3g. Fax no..
N/A
3h. Email address:
mdesormeaux @wcpss.net fJAY _ 7
NC DENR Raleigh Regional office T
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form— Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Design Firm
4b. Name:
Alice Reese
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
CLH Design, PA
4d. Street address:
400 Regency Forest Drive
4e. City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27518
4f. Telephone no.:
919 - 319 -6716 x 4035
4g. Fax no.:
919 - 319 -7516
4h. Email address:
areese @clhdesignpa.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Christopher J. Burkhardt / Eli N. Ruhl
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F &R)
5c. Street address:
310 Hubers Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603
5e. Telephone no.:
919 - 828 -3441
5f. Fax no.:
919 - 828 -5751
5g. Email address:
eruhl @fandr.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1745024813
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.8107 Longitude: - 78.5335
1 c. Property size:
22 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beaverdam Creek / Beaverdam Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of mostly wooded land with some Geared land including two mowed easements /ROW within a rural residential area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.05
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 80
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a new elementary school to meet the needs of the growing population which requires road improvements.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves construction of the School, utility connections, and off site road widening and realignment using typical mechanical equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Please See The Attached Preliminary JD Form
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Christopher J. Burkhardt
Agency /Consultant Company: F &R
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE 1 -08 -2015 E -mail
NC DWR 12 -09 -2014 Letter
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries 0 Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Riverine Swamp Forest
No
Corps
0.008
W2 T
Construction easement
Riverine Swamp Forest
No
Corps
0.05
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.058
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Stabilization
LIT of Beaverdam Lake
INT
DWQ
2
19
S2
Choose one
_
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
_
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
19
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
o
4g. Comments: No open water impacts
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
p
5g. Comments:
No Pond or Lake Construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑X No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
0
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
0
5k. Method of construction:
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) r
Temporary )
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Road Widening
Unnamed Tributary to Beaverdam Creek
Yes/No
66
168
B2 T
Road Widening
Unnamed Tributary to Beaverdam Creek
Yes/No
135
256
B3 T
Road Widening
Unnamed Tributary to Beaverdam Creek
Yes /No
356
488
B4 -
Yes/No
B5
Yes /No
B6 -
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
557
912
61. Comments: There are no impacts to the buffer associated with Beverdam Lake from the sewerline connection since the new sewer will be
installed within the existing sewer easement (existing and on -going use).
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project consists of widening an existing road. Impacts were avoided and minimized as much as practical aligning the road to avoid additional
impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Additional impacts will be avoided and minimized by preventing construction equipment from entering the remaining wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
MR Yes E] No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Road Widening
66
3 (2 for Catawba)
198
Zone 2
Road Widening
168
1.5
252
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
450
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund is proposed.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
37%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Please see the attached plan
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
The City of Raleigh
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
The City of Raleigh
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
0 Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑X Yes ❑ No
(Pending PCN Approval)
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review N/A
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review N/A
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
E] Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is proposed to serve the existing population. It is not anticipated that the school will result in additional development which could impact
nearby downstream water quality, based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will be connected to the City of Raleigh's sanitary sewer system and treated at the Neuse River Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat'(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh - Website
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Website
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO GIs Website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project consists of widening an existing road and is in accordance with best management practices for roads in the floodplain
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FIRM 3720174500J May 2, 2006
Christopher J. Burkhardt
5 -01 -15
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

SINCE FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302
® T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
7881 NC License #F -0266
October 30, 2014
Revised: January 26, 2015
Mr. William C. Hartley
Director- Facilities Design and Construction
WCPSS
1429 Rock Quarry Road
Suite 116
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Re: Wetland Delineation
Proposed E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No. 66S -0208
Property Description:
Size (acres): " 1 mile of road improvements Nearest Town: Raleieh, NC
Nearest Waterway: Beaverdam Creek River Basin: Neuse
USGS HUC: 03020201 Coordinates: 35.819174, - 78.522752
Location: Alone both sides of Tarheel Road and Old Milburnie Road in
Raleigh, Wake County, NC.
Mr. Hartley:
Froehling & Robertson, Inc., (F &R) presents herein the results of the wetland delineation conducted at
the above - referenced property located along both sides of Tarheel Road and old Milburnie Road in
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina (see Figure No. 1 in Attachments for site location map). The Project
involves off -site improvements to the proposed E -36 Elementary School located in the southwest corner of
the Tarheel Clubhouse Road and Tarheel Club Road. The improvements include connecting to the existing
sewerline located south of the proposed school and may impact the current road alignments along Tarheel
Clubhouse Road, Tarheel Club road and Old Milburine Road. F &R understands that the Proposed E -36
School Site was previously delineated by S &ME in March 20.14 under project No. 1305 -14 -028. A copy of the
school site delineation is attached.
Based on F &R's information review and on -site observations, four jurisdictional streams, three wetlands,
and one open body of water were identified on the project site. The streams and wetlands are located in
the Neuse River Basin and are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) have confirmed jurisdiction and their concurance is
attached. Additional wetlands or other potentially jurisdictional surface features were not documented
or observed on the project site.
HQ: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD RICHMOND, VA 23228 USA T804.264.2701 F804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA • NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Minority-Owned Business"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
This report describes the activities and findings associated with wetland delineation for the above -
referenced property. F &R reviewed applicable information sources to identify areas on the project site
that could be considered "Waters of the US" (i.e., wetland, stream, and open water features) and
subject to jurisdiction by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), United States Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE) and /or North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). On -site identification of wetlands
was performed in general accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
and subsequent COE clarification memorandums. On -site identification of streams was performed in
general accordance with the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and the NC -DWR
Identification Methods of the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams.
INFORMATION REVIEW
F &R reviewed the following resources prior to visiting the project site: aerial photographs (Google Earth)
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 -scale topographic map, Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS) Soil Survey, and National Wetland Inventory (NWI). Please see the attached figures for
copies of relevant portions of the above - referenced maps.
A review of Google Earth's 2014 aerial photograph depicts Beaverdam Lake but no streams or wetlands.
The USGS Topo maps Beaverdam Lake and four streams, but no wetlands on the project site.
The Soil Survey maps Beaverdam Lake and four streams but no wetlands on the project site.
The NWI map Beaverdam Lake and one stream (Beaverdam Creek) and one wetland located west of
Tarheel Club Road and North of Old Milburnie Road.
ON -SITE OBSERVATIONS
The project site currently consists of mostly wooded land with some cleared land including two mowed
easements. Based on F &R's on -site observations, four jurisdictional streams were observed in the field
along with three wetlands and one open body of water. One of the jurisdictional streams is perennial
while three are intermittent. The streams and lake are within the Neuse River basin and require buffers.
The USACE and NC DWR have confirmed jurisdiction. The approximate location of mapped surface
features is shown in the Attachments. The streams, their jurisdictional classification, and their buffer
status are shown below.
Buffered Features:
• S100 (C) Intermittent Stream
• S200 (C) Intermittent Stream
(downstream reach of 5100)
• S300 (B) Intermittent Stream
• S400 (A) Perineal Stream
(Beaverdam Creek)
• L100 Open Water (Beaverdam Lake)
Non - Buffered Features:
• W1,000 Wetland
• W2,000 Wetland
(Connects to W1,000
to form one wetland)
• W4,000 Wetland
Proposed E -36 Off -Site Improvements 2 October 30, 2014
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina F &R Project No. 66S -0208

f�R
F &R recommends that plans for development of the subject property consider the USACE and NC -DWR
procedures for assessing impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and /or streams (i.e., avoid, minimize, and
mitigate) to optimize permitting strategies. If proposed development on the project site does not result
in impacts to jurisdictional areas or the areas immediately adjacent to their boundaries a USACE permit
will not be necessary. Typical activities requiring USACE permitting include, but are not limited to,
depositing of fill or dredged material in wetlands; site development fill; construction of revetments,
groins, breakwaters, levees, dams, dikes, open trenches, and weirs; and placement of riprap and road
fill.
If impacts to these areas are anticipated, F &R recommends that site plans be developed that optimize
permitting strategies to comply with the USACE, NC -DWR, and local municipality procedures for
assessing impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and /or "Waters of the US" (i.e., avoid, minimize, and
mitigate).
LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Wake County Public School Systems (Client) for
this specific project. These services have been provided in accordance with generally accepted
environmental practices. No other warranty, expressed, or implied, is made. Our observations were
based upon conditions readily visible at the site at the time of our visit. If additional information
becomes available which may effect our conclusions and recommendations, we request the opportunity
to review the information, and reserve the right to modify our report, as warranted. Please do not
hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.
Respectfully Submitted,
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Christopher J. Burkhardt
Senior Environmental Professional
Attachments:
Figures: Site Maps, Aerial Photograph, USGS Topo, Soil Survey Map, NWI Map
USACE Concurrence Email
NC DWR Concurrence Letter
Site Photos
Agent Authorization Form
S &ME Wetland Report
Proposed E -36 Off -Site Improvements 3 Revised: January 26, 1015
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina F &R Project No. 66S -0208

jdant Church uh
1
d;
�r
�'o
y6
7
i OO,
O
O S�
�o� cfo
O
OH
. Oeo
4ysr�-`y4n
0
v
""'911 q
kE -36 SITE ,��
y b
OJ fit%
Area delineated is limited to: o�vb
Q�E- -100' on either side of the Rd, —;!1�y
100' on either side of the mapped stream, an
100" of shoreline centered on the 6th manhole from TarheeiNevseoco
2219 100' from
intersection
Lake
Site Map
l
?_ 1
C'>
�k
O�
O
l�
'1NOE
/
fL&
Ne, °
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302 1 USA
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
Client:
Wake County Public School System
Project:
E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Location:
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No:
66S -0238
Drawn By:
GB
Date:
October 2014 Scale Not Known

r E
- dream
�C 100
t
Stream
C 200 `
PP .
y Lake 100 Wetlands 1,000 - --
` Stream B 300
Wetlands 2,000,
Bevv om Cre
1 Stream
A 40
Site Observation Map
_10
fl
j f \
l
%1
P
�} l
Wetland
-4000
1H0F
/ w
F &K
1AH1
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • GEOTECHNICAL
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302 1 USA
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
Client:
Wake Count Public School System
Project:
E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Location:
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No:
66S -0238
Source:
Wake County Imaps
Date:
October 2014 Scale Not Known

2014 Aerial Photograph
NO1
w
&K
a
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302 1 USA
T 919.828.3441 1 F 919.828.5751
Client:
Wake County Public School System
Project:
E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Location:
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No:
66S -0238
Source:
Google Earth
Date:
October 2014 Scale Not Known

USGS Topographic Map
INC
F
eB1
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL* GEOTECHNICAL
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302 1 USA
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
Client:
Wake Count Public School System
Project:
E-36 Off-Site Improvements
Location:
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No:
665 -0238
Source:
USGS Topographic Map
Date:
October 2014

I N .J.'
APB?
o
eta
11A I
k
1j1(f��
N
a
NRCS Wake County Soil Survey
INC
F
88
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302 1 USA
T 919.828.3441 1 F 919.828.5751
Client:
Wake Count Public School System
Project:
E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Location:
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
F &R Project No:
66S -0238
Source:
NRCS Wake County Soil Survey
Date:
October 2014 1 Not To Scale

National Wetland Inventory
X OW
SINCE FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC. uiem: ou u n stem
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL Project: E -360ff -Site Im roveme is 1
& 310 Hubert Street Location: ake Count X, N rth arolina
No:
v` Ff� RESOURCES
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -23021 USA F &R Project
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751 Source: Ntiona
1 881 -- ll..a.. L.... — n 1 —a Y- C. -I-

Christopher Burkhardt
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hi Chris,
Shaeffer, David L SAW < David.L.Shaeffer @usace.army.miI>
Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:16 PM
Christopher Burkhardt
Walter Cole
SAW- 2014 -02308 Wake County Public School System, E -36 Elementary School(JD site
review not required) (UNCLASSIFIED)
Wetland Determination Data Form (Atlantic & Gulf Plain 2008 v2) 4- STRATA .... pdf,
Wetland Determination Data Form (Eastern Mountain & Piedmont 2012 v2) 5- ....pdf
I have reviewed the delineation report you submitted on October 28, 2014. 1 am concurring with your determination as-
is. No site visit is necessary.
I have copied Walter Cole from S &ME on this e-mail. He is working on the E -36 school site. He submitted a JD request for
the school site a couple weeks ago. I would like you and /or Walter to combine these two JD requests since they are part
of the same project. That will require you to submit a revised wetland map with new labels, etc.
In the future, please export all documents created in word /adobe to PDF format. We are moving towards electronic
submittals and would like our PDFs files to be searchable. If you scan the document and then convert it to PDF it
eliminates the ability to search the document. It would also be helpful if you could use the attached fillable data forms in
the future.
Sincerely,
David L. Shaeffer, Geographer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: 919 - 554 -4884 ext. 31 Fax: 919 - 562 -0421
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http : / /regulatory.usacesurvey.com/
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

f'
r �
? Pat McCrory
.a Govemor
FWA
IKD NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 17, 2014
M.J. Desomeaux, Jr. on behalf of the Wake County Board of Education
1551 Rock Quarry Road
Raleigh, NC 27610
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO #14 -449
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Start@
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B.0259)
[I Ephemeral /intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B. 0267)
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: E -36 Off -Site Improvement
Location/Directions: The projected area is located off Tarheel Club Road and Old Milburnie
Road, in Raleigh, Wake County
Subject Stream: Beaver Dam Creek
Determination Date: 12/9 /2014 Staff: Cheng Zhang
Stream
E /I/P*
Not Subject
to Buffers
Subject to
Buffers
Start@
Stop®
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A
P
X
X
X
B
I
X
DWQ flag
X
X
C
I
X
X
X
D
E
X
X
Beaver
Dam Lake
X
X
X
,os,� — �. Y.. en.eruurii�c,rn�oerrwrrrrreruui
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
)�` CaolTV Wru1
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone [phone]
Intemet www.ncwaterauality.org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity /AtfirmaWe Acdan Employer-50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper

E -36 Off -Site improvement
Wake County
12!9!2014 I
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR.WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
_ -- _ -- Center, Ra1eigh,NC_2MM.- -- -- -- - - -- -
This determination_ is final -and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919 )-807 -6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554 -4884.
If you have' questions regarding tins determination, please feel free, to contact Coeng Zhang at (919) 791 -4259.
Si rel
Danny Snnth
Supervisor, Water Quality Regional Operations Center,
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Chris Buii wxk 17&1;, -310, Hubert Street, Raleigh, NC 27603
a

{
I
IV

STI
Lit
. W4
k A.
m
ApE
Lo(

;- 11
Wo
ov
01? •�
AMP
wrA
a
■a
�� JI
u
_ �• },c5' -`L- =� � . -. aim''° °.i �,`i
�}E
_ a

WCPSS E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Raleigh North Carolina
Site Photos
Photo 1— View of Stream 100 looking upstream of the project site.
Photo 2 — View of Stream 200 looking upstream toward Tarheel Club Road.

WCPSS E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Raleigh North Carolina
Site Photos
Photo 3 — View of Stream 300 looking downstream.
Photo 4 — View of Stream 400 (Beaverdam Creek) looking downstream.

WCPSS E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Raleigh North Carolina
Site Photos
Photo 5 — General view of Beaverdam Lake.
Photo 6— View of Wetland 1000.

WCPSS E -36 Off -Site Improvements
Raleigh North Carolina
Site Photos
Photo 5 — General view of Wetland 2000.
Photo 8— View of Wetland 4000.

SINCE F'ROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Engineering Stability Since 1881
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 -2302,
T 919.828.34411 F 919.828.5751
1881 ® NC License #F -0266
October 30, 2014
United State Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: USACE Agent Authorization Letter
E -36 Off Site Improvements
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
The undersigned hereby authorizes Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (F &R) to proceed on behalf of the
current property owner(s) as the agent for Waters of the State of United States. Consulting and
permitting issues pertaining to the above referenced project site. This agent authorization letter
supersedes all previous agent authorizations.
Sincerely,
FROEHLING & ROBERTSON, INC.
Christopher J. Burkhardt
Environmental Department Manager
Corporate H4: 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, Virginia 23228 T804.264.2701 F804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA a NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND *-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Minority-Owned Business
2nd Signature:
Signature:
optional
Printed Name:
A De:or>'r�ux.
Printed Name:
A93L nd int fora
Organization:
WgIke County Board of Education,
Organization:.
pumumd to duly del9gatad
\Nxvc Ca.r\�%A b1kG Sehoa I S
Mailing
Address:
06 fp4G
15`�t �QocK c"`"'ry 2a'
Mailing Address:
g
Phone Number:
$Sto , $ ayrl
Phone Number:
Corporate H4: 3015 Dumbarton Road Richmond, Virginia 23228 T804.264.2701 F804.264.1202 www.fandr.com
VIRGINIA a NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA • MARYLAND *-DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
A Minority-Owned Business

S&ME
March 17, 2014
Wake County Public School System
Real Estate Services
1551 Rock Quarry Road, Facilities Building
Raleigh, NC 27610
Attention: Ms. Betty Parker, Director
Reference: Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland/Waters of the U.S. Assessment
and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Evaluation
WCPSS E-36 Elementary School Site
Tarheel Club Road and Tarheel Clubhouse Road
St. Matthews Township, Wake County, North Carolina
S &ME Job No. 1305 - 14-028
Dear Ms. Parker:
S &ME personnel completed a preliminary jurisdictional wetland/waters of the U.S.
assessment and Neuse River riparian buffer evaluation on the proposed Wake County
School System ( WCPSS) E -36 elementary School site. The 21.5 acre proposed
elementary school project site is the the northern portion of an approximately 184 -acre
parcel of land located in the southern quadrant of the intersection of Tarheel Club Road
and Tarheel Clubhouse Road, St. Matthews Township, Wake County, North Carolina.
This parcel is more particularly described as a portion of the parcel having Wake County
PIN# 1745029854 and Wake County REID# 0005362. These services were performed in
general accordance with S &ME Proposal 13- 1400053 -B dated January 24, 2014.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 depict the location of the site on a US Geologic Survey (USGS)
topographic quadrangle map and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural
Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Wake County soil survey map, respectively.
Figure 3 depicts a 2011 color aerial (orthophotograph) map of the site.
SCOPE OF SERVICES -
The preliminary wetlands /waters of the U.S. assessment consisted of traversing the-
property to examine soils, vegetation, and hydrology across the site in search of areas that
'meet the minimum criteria for jurisdictional wetlands as described by the procedures set
forth in the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) "Wetlands Delineation
r Manual" (January 1987 —Final Report). Proof of wetland hydrology would be the
S&ME, INC. 13201 Spring Forest Road / Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 IF 919.876.3958 1 www.smeinc.com -

Report for Natural Resource Services S &ME Project No. 1305 - 14-028
WCPSS E36, St. Matthews Township, Wake County, NC March 17, 2014
existence of hydric soils with oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches of the soil
profile, water borne deposits, drift lines, scour marks, drainage patterns, regional
indicators of soil saturation, etc. It is important to note that wetlands are also classified as
waters of the US and regulated by the USACE under authority of the Clean Water Act
(33 USC 1344).
On March 13, 2014, multiple hand auger borings to assess the soil conditions for
evidence of hydric soil indicators and for wetland hydrology were performed in drainage
areas and topographically concave areas within the project boundary. In addition, a
USACE data form included as Attachment 1 was completed documenting the plant, soil
and hydrology findings within the ephemeral drainage area (Feature A) shown on the
attached Project Boundary / Topographic Map (Figure 4).
S &ME's Neuse River stream buffer evaluation consisted of examining features on or in
close proximity to the site that is shown on the most recent version of the Wake County
soil survey map prepared by USDA -NRCS of the and/or the 7.5- minute quadrangle
topographic maps prepared by the USGS using North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NC -DWR) stream evaluation techniques. There are no streams depicted on
the USGS map, however there are two intermittent streams shown within the project
boundary on the Wake County soil survey map, which are labeled as Feature A and
Feature B. A NC -DWR Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11) was completed for
Feature A and Feature B and they are included as Attachment 2. Site photographs
documenting the conditions of Feature A and Feature B are included as Attachment 3.
RESULTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Our assessment indicates that there are no jurisdictional wetlands, waters of the U.S.
within the proposed project boundary and that Features A and B depicted as an
intermittent stream channel on the Wake County soil survey map are not subject to the
Neuse River riparian buffer rules. However, site meetings with the USACE and NC-
DWR are needed to confirm our findings and S &ME can provide these additional
services in a separate proposal upon request.
2

Report for Natural Resource Services SWE Project No. 1305 - 14-028
WCPSS E -36, St. Matthews Township, Wake County, NC March 17, 2014
S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide the natural resource services related to this
project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact Walter Cole -at (919) 801 -3798 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
S &ME, Inc.
Walter Cole, L.S.S., RE.H.S.
Environmental Scientist
Enclosed:
;� A;;7
Tom Raymond
Environmental Services Manager
Attachment 1: USACE Upland Data Form
Attachment 2: NCDWR Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11)
Attachment 3: Site Photographs of Feature A and Feature B
Figure 1: USGS Topographic Quadrangle — Raleigh East Quadrangle
Figure 2: Wake County Soil Survey — Sheet 50
Figure 3: Color Aerial Orthophotograph Map — Raleigh East Quadrangle
Figure 4: Project Boundary / Topographic Map
3

MAP SOURCE: USDA -SCS WAKE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP; ISSUED NOV 1970
SCALE: 1 :15,840 FIGURE N0.
DATE: *"ME USDA -SCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
MAR 2014 WAKE COUNTY SHEET 50 2
DRAWN BY: WC
WiMN.SMEINC.COM WCPSS E -36 SITE
PROJECT ND: 32 ENGINEER LICENSE D, RALEIGH. CLUBHOUSE ROAD, WAKE COUNTY, NC
1305 -14 -028 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616

MAP SOURCE: W TOPO, GOGGLE EARTH MAPS; 2011
r E: 1 : 3,000 FIGURE N0.
S &ME COLOR AERIAL MAP
MAR 2014 RALEIGH EAST QUADRANGLE 3
N BY: WC V1MJIN.SMEINC COM WCPSS E -36 SITE ECrNO: 32 ENGINEER LICENSED, RALEIGH, TARHEEL CLUBHOUSE ROAD, WAKE COUNTY, NC
1305 -14028 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616

0
e�smr�
d:r
io 300 600
MAP SOURCE: NCONEMAP PARCELAND LIDAR CONTOURS
SCALE:
DATE:
1~ = 300' PROJECT BOUNDARY TOPO MAP FIGURE NO. MME MAR 2014
DRAWN BY, WCPSS E -36 SITE 4
Xv WWW.SMEINC.COM TARHEEL CLUBHOUSE ROAD
PROJECT NO: NC ENG. LICENSE #F -0176
kb,- 1305 -14 -028 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616 WAKE COUNTY, NC

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Easter Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: WCPSS Eastern Raleigh Area Site E-36 City /County: Wake Sampling Date: 3/1312014
Appricant/owner. Wake County Public School System State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): W Cole, A. Steele Section, Township, Range: St. Matthews Township
Landfonn (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2 -10
Subregion (-RR or MLRA): 136"P Let: 78.52861 W Long: 36.81995 N Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydro) is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑ , or Hydro logy ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No g
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ���❑°°��---- Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Soil Present? Yes � No a within a Wetland? Yes _a No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaLdnxn
QSurfaoe Soil Cracks (136)
❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that aooly)
OSurface
Water (A7) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Suf ide Odor (C1)
QDrainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation (A3)
[::]Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
OMoss Trim Lines (1316)
[::]Water
Marks (131)
[::]Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
QDry- Season Water Table (C2)
[::]Sediment
Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
[—]Crayfish Burrows (C8)
[_]Drift
Deposits (133)
[—]Thin Muck Surface (C7)
aturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
[::]Other
Blunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
OGeomorphic Position (D2)
Qinundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
QShallowAquitard (D3)
❑
Water - Stalned Leaves (Bg)
QMicrotopographic Relief (134)
E:]
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
QFAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Present? Yes
No 0 Depth Cinches):
No Depth
Saturation Present? Yes ❑
Cinches):
No 0 Depth
❑
includes capillary fringe)
(inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1. Pinus taeda
Absolute
) % Cover
25
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
YES FAC
2 Ilex opaca
40
YES FACU
3 Quercus nigra
10
NO FAC
4. Oxydendrum arborsum
5
NO UPL
5. Carya cordiformis
5
NO FACU
6. Querau velutina
10
NO NI
7.
- -
8.
- -
95
= Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Prunus serotina 5 YES FACU
2. - -
3. - -
4. -
5. -
6. - -
7. -
10. - -
5 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. -
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Lonicera japonica 5
2. 1ldls rotundifolla 5
3.
4.
5.
6.
10
or on a separate
Sampling Point- Upland
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
®1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
_ Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
= Total Cover Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
YES FAC
YES FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No EL
= Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %_ Color (moist) �_ Type' Texture Remarks
0.4 10YR 3/3 100 loam
4-16+ 10YR 4/4 100 sandy loam
Hydric
Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils°:
Histosol (Al)
Q Dark Surface (S7)
Q 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Q Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Q Depleted Matrix (F3)
Q Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Q Red Parent Material (TF2)
Q Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR N,
Redox Depressions (F8)
Q Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
[] Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
°Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Q Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (MLRA 146)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (H observed):
Type:
Depth
✓
g
(inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Veman d_11
Date: 3
FeochAr c
LM MWO:
Evaluator. W . Cole
Count r. Wake
lorrgituda: 35, 8 f Q4 sN
Other Ra le i c, h
egQaradntsrna:
Total Points:
Stream is st(eaeta4wMM" 2
C. N •30•
gtm� OebmWnatlon (drele one)
P eMM ntermitteM Perennial
.19w
3
Ouad
A Geo ho Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 Continulty of channel bed and bank
00
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel akxV-thahM
0
1
2
3
3. In- channel sbuchme: wL ril bixx 1, step•pooll
1 ool uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle sine of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
6• AdWreft min.
0.5
1
2
3
& Osposftnal bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent aihNM depo b
24. Amphibians
1
2
3
8. FleadGrls
0
25. Algae
2
3
9. Grade control
1
0.5
1
1.5
10. Mural valley
=1.5
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
= 0
Yes = 3
r..rw. wvw wa - .wra . alOV. moo Yli{.IODIW C{ D I RIlQIWI
B. Hvdmloav (Suhtntal = A I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
2
3
3
13. Iron axklWng bacteria
00
14. Leaf Otter
1.6
1
0.8
15. Sedlm nt an plants or debris
CO-)
0.6
1
1.8
18.OTganlc debris lures or piles
21. Aquatic Moffud w
0.5 .
1
1.6
17. Soil evidence of high water tab le?
No = 0
Yea = 3
v. v!vluur I.JUULUU ! - v !
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
p
19. Rooted upland plants In etreambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note dkmby and abundance)
COD
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Moffud w
1
2
3
22• Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23•
0.5
1
1.6
24. Amphibians
M>
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
28. Wetland plants In sbeembed
FACW = 0.75; OBI.
=1.5
LOthiewr = 0
•perwuft Owns may also be IdantiBed using other n *w& See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Idendf melon Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 /13 /20 q
Prolew8ft9: E -3(., Fea4u"e
L8ftde: -7$.5273 -% W
Evaluator. W. Cote
County: W OL ke
Longltuda: 35,$19 (og IJ
ogre. Ra it r9 k E03+
Total Points:
Stresmlestleaetift"Iftil
stream Detarminadon (clrcle one)
B•:19a d• W
ams Inte"ni tent Perennial
e. g GeedName: Qu A d
/4. Geomorphology Subtotal =
1`C4)ntlnulty of channel bed and bank
Absent
Week
1
Moderate
2
2
Strong
3
3
2. Slnuosigr of channel along thalweg
0
3. In-diannel structure: wL dffle-pool. step -pool,
d r sequence
O
1
2
3
4. ParWe size of stream subabift
0.5
1
2
3
6• Advwlm t floodp1ei
1
1
2
3
8. DeposOwel bare or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
(-Cs
1
2
3
8. Headcufs
0
Cip
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.6
1
1.6
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Qft = 0
Yes = 3
M mwAw umx1 me 1101111®x; Oa UMUSawns M men=
B. Hvdmkmw (Suhtntal c n i
12. Presence of Basaflaw
3
1
2
3
13. Iron oxkk ing bacteria
ft3
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
CO),
0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or pges
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. SdRmed aMdenoe of high water table?
0 = 0
Yes = 9
V. Oluluuv I.luuu7xll la LJ I
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted is In streambed
3
2
1
20. Maaobendwe (note dva * and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aguaft Mollusks
O
1
2
3
22• Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.6
1
1.6
26• Aloe
0.6
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0.76; OBL
=1.5
= 0
•OwermW streams may also be ldenllried using Darer me#WL Seep.
35 of manual.
Names:
Sketch:

IT,
laV,
f. p
tq,
Iz Nil
- A
1A.
laV,

VIA
,td N:
r
•. - �� �t
-?� 4A.,
11�
�•
_
r Mw
^.
J •�v
I t
�' !t 1'�'
VIA
,td N:
r
•. - �� �t
-?� 4A.,
11�

rn
LL
v w
W
O
y m
2
Q Oo �s °
O
(D
¢
v Q o P
�O �t,yca.c
J
Z 0 LU
y
OON 00 CY) LU Z
V(n�U �n(0c- � (r
¢�EEo
a o o Qai
N -,
Z�ZZ V-cD (�
c Z y
N mmc° O
LLl ~W= Nom- H m
O cmiE o w.�
LLI -J
Q Z� M M Z 2i � C
(1) 00
o a
a o o o m E
N Q p
(D -�ZM J On (D
CO, J J
Z
O
II o-4.' 3 m m
m U
M li O a: O N m N d) 2)) N 3 c U)
Lr) < 0 O (° � 7 3 0 C O O m (� a) ..
O
L o 3
U t v 4 o m
C'i
M 00 r (V (`M p p .�- O); m 'y 'O O 000 O ..-. 69 Z C F1J N
M
m
m E Z
ao r-w U)i U) 0coC °-� CR -o -0m'noo°)6)�o ai�UU E
0 V
"�
Z� ymt
N� •-- i N N N O O p °Mj N� Q Z
C N N
Z
C a) O W 0--OU p o�-a.0 -6 -J 0 N l_N4�m `� �� w mZ TN N
V
v y N
'� ul �ma.Q a. O m ma N N N U T a. -aL 7 main U
) m O�Ud
r W Z N 6)O)�'O NQ
�
y O 0 a
m E
uNi iinn< 0NW Cm(n
'Oa
D_ C -C
m m¢
—_= al m N m N umi .0 O= m m 3 m n N
Z m
O m 3 m m m N N N N O to O ♦'- °) t= O N O >. O m=
RR
Q E
aw202��0000Q¢ ma0=(nF-r �o�0
0
a?sz
Ot
� \suet
°0(\e \\
M� `
4u
lu
N
�
L J
Z
RR
J(1 1:1oa uoil
0
.tea
a `
)
CR
p/O
a
O�
O
�
1�.
ul pieagloe�g
_pb asno4q^I7jaayjel
w
1
V
� 3
�
�
E
� 9
a
a
LL
0 �J
0 0
nn

�1 r�
Y r'f
L,
41
4
U
49
r 4*i
S'
Alvi
F er m
f ':irk
fi
�7
C
G.�
4�1
WailtY+�$
?+049#
N
r
�l
v,oce 00!0 gd
n
"', "WAIM1 Tarheel Clubhouse
�r,3 0 —
'0Irrrt tt
April 29, 2015
DOE Points
Determined Eligible
DOE, Gone
n
.J
'r'+A.l583 Griffin -Rams dell Farm
4�
n
r
C1
WAV&4 Howe
Neuseoo Ladte Dam',„.-
WAIMO Beaver Dam Dance Fis hin g+ Fn 2004
I
L�
u
L n
a
R
WA -R134 Hoarse
1:18,056
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 mi
0 0.25 0.5 1 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp,
NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
Tom Tom, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
SL and DOE Community

742A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McOory 13 yw GosW Donald R. van der Vaaft
Governor Director Secretary
NCNHDE -233
April 29, 2015
Elias Ruhl
F &R
310 Hubert Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
eruhl @fandr.com
RE: WCPSS-Propsed E -36; 66S -0402
Dear Elias Ruhl:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation /managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at [e-mail] or
919.707.8629.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 5

(5
CD
Q
v
d
�O
CL`
d
L
0)
V
G)
r
C
N
y
E,
d
C1
�0
C
R to N
M �
.a W oLO CO)
r-
y N N N
ui a (o _ w
m O C. ONG
CL) IL Z - z
Q W LCL
�a oQz
z °'
(i
0)
0
C
V
v
O
C
Cd
C
2
w
m
w
CD
x
f0
z
a�
L
a 'a m
l9 a)
co Z
a =
co d
Z a) a)
U m 0-
Z m U)
co
m
o
(D 0
L Co f6
' `) L
f0 f0 m
L
a) c (6
N C U)
m
0 0� c
L E c0
� � C
C E U
N y d
y
Co Co Co
°'EU
c0 O
C d
N N
O N Ea
U
N
CL .`L- U)
E O >'�
n. c � m
N d j f0
O U
L_ N Co
O
3L n a)
a) L N 'O
C a) CL
c E E
cn
m >, O
3
>' cn m
lU9 y y
= U '0 O
U a) U)
U C C
(d O 0
rn U) = co
V) U
L w m E
Z. O O
>
O c0 d Mn
U N N •�
Eoa)U
o N Z a)
c w C IC
U C V
C
C
a)
3 s a
U y U) (0
�aao=
()yE3
E a) m
N O Z
N d Z
y -0 C7 a)
E o
O = Wa
C
_
O O
C L = N
M"
y m `m
M" C z U)
O
a) V) U
d a� m m
L O y d
H 'O = U)
R
d
Q
V
d
a`
d Q
L_ V
C N
t O
w a`
�3 c
Z L
y +.
C
d
E a
3 C
V Cy
0 E
3
� U
m QO
y
l0 y
d �p
Q a
R a
y
l0 �
z
C
z 2
5
z �:i
V T
W _
N �
Eh 7
CL N
z m
CL
m Li
Z
N O
N N
CL a
� a
7 N
m 0
z a
al z
U ZU
m `
m
L O
N
3
UO
N N
N
N O]
C c N
N
C � c
O
�' O.
O Lm m
0 - (D
M c c
L) O N
O m r N
J E m
o c "mo
c CO
f0
c O 2
+ O z
C' p
N v _o z
L) U
m m
` p N
(D °
> U 01 V
O y m
•v �
c6 `m
U `y ch >
0 3 ' m
o m
N, o u c
CL c aci c
m c
U
E n N
N C
c o co, E
O. a) c
U N o c
Y a m aa)
>> c
cc m m C N
m 7 m
m j O
O N .-
rn °- m
m T C
C m U C
m E N
E 4-- m m
c ra o .O
O y U O.
m a m
N Z mm o
N
L) M �
o
U N
m m n
L U O� m
a y a)
N N �
`m
a) N m
m 7 T
N N m m
d T y C
U C O
l0 O c
fC U y C m
CL d v 3
U) ° LL m m
a c o
m
n m o a E
x "
°n2 ICD
y
of
O L a N ca
C
U = m c O
d 111 rn o m
N H 2 c E
O 'y m o
'. z 2 0.9
m
m
m
CL

R
41
Q
u
O
IL`
d
.0
w
O
N
3
a
R
a,
c
O
R
N
R
Q M N
ID W 049M
C 41 O N
CL ocip
p d Z N =
Lcav�0rL
as -
N ? �
a a
a
z
(a
4)
V
C
u
u
O
C
4)
E
W
CD
8)
m
2
l`0
7
Ii
m
04
CO
04
Ncc
U)
C-�
R Y
C
LO
LO
N
l0
LO
c
m
C
V
al
N
a)
a)
C L
U •C" 0)
R �
ami
m a)
c d
m
ti
O
a
C
U)
F-
F—
(n ca
W
O C
U)
m r
a) L)
•v
Co
c
a°
LL
U
U)
�
c
a)mm
c c
ma)
3
=0
0
cc
O c c c
c c
3
(D
> O
a
a
a a) a)
m a)
U
L6
0 0 0
O O
a
CV)
Cl)
CV)
u .°-�
U' U' U'
C7 U'
4)
cmmmw
d
o c)
UU
3 0 0 0 °
OJJJfn
Ca
(A
`a
In
m
(n
o 0
JJ
C C
d d
7 •°
c
a)
m
V
C
m
(�
•c
� �
O
7
..
O
O
W v
r�R+
=
U
=
U
=
w
i3
in
in
O
7
C C C F-
7
F-
7
F--•
7
H
C C
E EE�
c
c
c
EE
00
N
C C C
c C
_ :.
y R
O
O
°'
m a) m a)
0 0 00 0)
a)
cT
a)
m
a)
0)
a) a)
0 0
N
O
co
O) O) O) C
C
c
c
°) cm
R
°
co
m
U U L) m
m
m
m
m m
N
o
C)
C
O O
Q O
N
N
0 0 0
Y
a) a)
R'' _n M
m
m
m
n
•°
d
m
N
m
d R
Q` a
_n _fl
>> C
Q E E E
C
m
C
m
G
m
_n
7 7
E E
r4L
�
E
C7
uM°)
(D
cc,cU
a)
U
U
U
cc
° 6
o
"
o y r
a U
z
UE U
'a E
p
c
m
r aa))N
3 m m co L) �U
OO��i�iZLLZLLZLLZLL»
�U
=1 L) �
>m >m
E
cc
L)
4,
U)
°
a)
c
�..W �
°
d
— O
a)
m
m
O
(
U
Of
W
U
Z
>
a
a
R
c
O
U)
4)
N
N
d
c d
m
m
E
a) m
c
m
m
m
r E
3
0
Z
d
c
W
O
W
W
W
R
z
L
L)
_�
O
C
O
a
R C
a
C
a
C
a
C
'G.2
a)
N
LR
E
m
R
C LL
•.L+
LL
LL
LL
C C
4) C
w
m
L
=
y
C
co
U)
in
in
C C
C_
C•
m
N
w
E E
G
E
•�+
y
7
H
H
H
H
N N
N N
c3.1 U)
U
J
Z
CC
d
0
U)
m m
O
°= n
m m m m E
E
E
E
a) a)
OQ
co
m
N
co
O
0 O
E m m m p)
O)
p)
p)
m m
V LU
It
N
M
ti
co
N
co
c0
N
P O
3 C_ C. C. m
E
m
m
m
Q. C.
W
co
c)
N
ca
V
° m
O c C C m
p R m a) 02
m
2
m
2
m
2
C C
a) (D
`
3
Lv)
C >
yZ nnn
m ROOO mm
a))
a)
a)
CL CL
00
H
CD
a
d
QEm
aa3000c
c
c
c
o 0
t.E
c 0
m
3
m 3
m
m
m Z
tm cm U U U 0
m
U U
E C O.
E
0 E
L > L
u) m N
Y Y Y U
U
aa)
U
aa)
U
Y Y
X O
m R
ca m
>_
y
m
N
m
a3+ a) o-
R m n
C C
R R m m m U
U
U
U
m m
W.�.U'__DULLmtL
>
>
zU)
� ���Z
Z
Z
Z
M,
°
ch
CD
rn
m
a

N
0
T
�E
n
7
U)
2
0
N
(6
N
EL
Sri
0
N
.a
Q
N
a
x
z
U
z
ui
U
7
O
N
N
N
T
N
CL
Q
c
O
a
G1
f0
c
C
c
G)
Cl)
N L9
7
Q ca
l9 a
�a
ox
z
U
z
N
t
0
a
m
a
a
m
T
N
7
C
8
N_
C
O
l0
O
C
�i
O G)
a C
C y
7 f0
r0 C
O O
c +
U �C
N U
N N
U0 C
O.
a �
C
l6 O
N d
C �
O N
f0 N
C N
a
_ Co
ayi °1
a �
ca m
y c
,6 o
o c
c Co
o
m d
c O
l0
a
x .-
FD
C N
@ m
a v
c d
m
N C
C O
O
'C
� C
Y,
Ei
d
O7
co
IL

<MyY•�
l•J
^0^`
v^/
0
^^L
!LL
V )
U
M
N
0
z
U
Z
j v
s
ea
s
5
S
�c�4!
t x
m 3
o Y � a
€m
0 e
o -
m c�
C'i N o
No o E
yeu
N $ Z
O NO 02
WO
SLL
N
7
v0
`m
a
w
co
cc
a�
Q
z Q
Z
Z
0
ca
¢`
o a �
0 m a.
rn
CL m z
N l
Q E I ... _.1
I
N
rn
d

Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and ... Page 1 of 2
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina
*"*Ilnow ■�L�
Updated: 4 -2 -2015
Common Name
Scientific name
Federal
__ Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
American eel
Anguilla rostrata
FSC
Current
Bachman's sparrow
Aimophila aestivalis
FSC
Historic
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Carolina darter
Etheostoma collis lepidinion
FSC
Probable /potential
Carolina madtom
Noturus furiosus
FSC
Current
Northern lone -eared bat
Myotis septentrionalis
T
Current
Pinewoods shiner
Lythrurus matutinus
FSC
Current
Red - cockaded woodpecker
Picoides borealis
E
Current
Roanoke bass
Ambloplites cav irons
FSC
Current
Southeastern myotis
Myotis austroriparius
FSC
Historic
Southern hognose snake
Heterodon simus
FSC
Obscure
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
FSC
Current
Diana fritillary (butterfly)
Speyeria dana
FSC
Current
Dwarf wedgemussel
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
FSC
Current
Yellow lance
Elliptio lanceolate
FSC
Current
Vascular Plant:
Bog spicebush
Lindera subcoriacea
FSC
Current
Grassleaf arrowhead
Sagittaria weatherbiana
FSC
Historic
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Current
Sweet pinesap
Monotropsis odorata
FSC
Historic
Virginia least trillium
Trillium pusillum var. virginianum
FSC
Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist /wake.html 4/29/2015

Wake County Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern, and ... Page 2 of 2
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon 'likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
FSC= Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other selected
focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
T(S /A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S /A) are not biologically endangered or
threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT ",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346- 37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668 -668d) becomes the primary
law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a statutory
definition of "take" that includes "disturb ". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle Management
Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid disturbing bald
eagles. For mor information, visit http: / /www.fws. og v/migratoKybirdsibaideap-le.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S /A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822 - 55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S /A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S /A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T
(S /A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S /A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable /potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh /species /cntylist /wake.html 4/29/2015