20150208 Ver 1_Application_20150220

Camp Watia ( +/- 252 Acres)

rJ
Camp Watia ( +/- 252 Acres)
J
(7, }
ti
a
Delineation Boundary
• J
r
F
It
rW%7W] ■
10
OA
Legend 0 250 500 1,000 1,500
Delineation Boundary ,
wn r Feet
oj � � ,,,
Swain County, CLearWater USGS Topographic Map
North Carolina Wesser Quad
224 South Grove Street, Suite F Figure 2
I lendersonville, Nonh Carolina 28792

Figure 3
Impact Map & Construction Typicals

0
0
N
V
O
N
0
3
v
Ni
U
m
C6
O
O
s
N
3
0
E
Te
N
o!
w
ii
.�M PACT - SITE=
\` NET STREAM
IMPACT (65 LF)
_ \ \\ PROPOSED
i 71
2194 - -� "– —
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
PROPOSED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P -1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET I OF 7
214 N. King Street
SWAIN COUNTY,
job #1 1 0138
Hendersonville. NC 28792
` (828) 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
Date: 1/29/15
wglaxom
Scale: I " =50'

0)
�2
Cl..
E 'n
LL
Z
Lu
w
LL
w
CD
Z
w
cr
w
D
0
LL
L)
cb
:2
14
E
Y
co
Cr
w
U)
D
a:
NO ACTI E
STREAM
EXISTING
12"0 CULV RT PROPOSED
PR ED WATER FRONT AREA
CULVERT
PAVILLION/RESTROOM
UL
UL ,
<
r
0
WATIA LAKE "cam"am—p
IMPACT SITE
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
PROPOSED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P -1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 2 OF 7
214 N. King Street
SWAIN COUNTY,
Job #: 10138
- , Hendersonville, 28792
(828) [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA
Date: 1/29/15
wgl;k.com I
I
Scale: 1 "=50'

0
a
N
m
0
(�1
O1
a
17
N
r
X
m
O
C
a
CL
E
E
A
rn
v
d
J
LL
x
D
_o
J
LL
W
rA
m
H
W Z
[C
D
0
LL
Y
U
U
ra
rb
r7
o_
0
N
0
E
Y
in
tr
W
N
6i
PROPOSED NEW ' ; -
30 "0 CULVERT
{ 1 �
'IMPACT SITE #3
NET STREAM
IMPACT (20 LF)
-
`-; •� � �• r •.:.- •�..
EXISTING 12 "0 CULVERT^
8 LF TO BE REMOVED
WGLA Engineering, PLLC PROPOSED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS CAMP WATIA SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P -1342 NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP SHEET 3 OF 7
214 N. King Street SWAIN COUNTY, fob #: 10138
Hendersonville, NC 28792
(828) b87 -71717 7 NORTH CAROLINA Date: 1/29/15
r� wgla.com Scale: I " =50'

0
6
0
N
9
:_
Y
in
w
w
rn
ii
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
PROPOSED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P -1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 4 OF 7
214 N. King Street
No
SWAIN COUNTY,
job #: 10138
Hendersonville, 828) 67 17 28792
(828j 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
Date: 1/29/15
wgla.com
Scale: 1"=50'

O
N
IMPACT SITE #6
NET STREAM fJ
EXISTING
- — — — IMPACT (1 LF) CULVERTS
(TO REMAIN) 1
PROPOSED
36 "0 CULVERT I2
Lei (20 LF) @ 10.0% ry
OD
leio-
�•�j 1
J
(/ �- // lam. 1 ..•'
LL -ixSS1
lu
LIJ
z
ui
L) —
ad
Fu
W
W
Ir
Ir
eb
ca
LL
EXISTING
18 "0 CULVERT
(19 LF) TO BE REMOVED
r'
0
WGLA E PLLC
f �&f-
N
nglneermg,
PROPOSED
c�
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P -1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET S OF 7
Y
,n
cc
214 N. King Street
••• Hendersonville, NC 28792
SWAIN COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
job #: 10138
Date:
(828) 687 -7177
1129/15
wgla.com
Scale: 1"=50'
LL

O
N
Q PROPOSED TEMPORARY
°
SEWER LINE CROSSINGS 3
M
Co
o
°
II p
r ,
-- IMPACT SITE #8
CL ` SW_ —211R—fNA —tNR^
,-' EXISTING STEEL
BRIDGE (TO REMAIN ) - -
r-
E / / -
a
/ ; � IMPACT SITE 0 _
Co
r
w -fit , EXISTING
I' ,�'�- - WATER SUPPLY
`�' WELL #2 _
W rill
i- VW \�
CO y / JI N
4 PROPOSED TEMPORARY rl,`.
WATER LINE CROSSINGS' jam:
s
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
PROPOSED
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: P 1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 6 OF 7
214 N. King Street
ende
Hnornille, NC 28792
SWAIN COUNTY,
job -#- 10138
,
a
(628) 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
Date: (/29/15
r� wgia com
Scale: 1 ° =50'
LL

0
N
r
v
0
c�
m
Ln
m
to
N
x
CD
0
K
is
E
E
m
N
v
m
rw
7
x
d'
Ir
2
0
ii
w
Lu
LL
d
U
co
3
0
s
N
E
w
V)
s
ED TEMPORARY
WATER LINE CROSSING
PROPOSED
Y:,
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
IMPACT SITE #9
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 7 OF 7
Jill
SWAIN COUNTY,
job 4P 10138
NC 28792
(828) 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
-- ----------------- ___ -; \
--G wgla com
Stale: 1"=50'
PROPOSED
:WALKING BRIDGE
- PROPOSED TE VIPORA�tY
PROPOSED
-- - WALKING TRAIL
���
�/- �' �� --- __ ---_. ``��� `•. �• .��`� �� � \` � 1. \ � � .--
s
ED TEMPORARY
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
WATER LINE CROSSING
PROPOSED
Y:,
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
IMPACT SITE #9
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 7 OF 7
214 N King Street
Hendersonville,
SWAIN COUNTY,
job 4P 10138
NC 28792
(828) 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
-- ----------------- ___ -; \
--G wgla com
Stale: 1"=50'
- PROPOSED TE VIPORA�tY
- SEWER- L-INE�CROSS)NG�
���
�/- �' �� --- __ ---_. ``��� `•. �• .��`� �� � \` � 1. \ � � .--
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
PROPOSED
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
CAMP WATIA
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
NC License No: N 1342
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SHEET 7 OF 7
214 N King Street
Hendersonville,
SWAIN COUNTY,
job 4P 10138
NC 28792
(828) 687 -7177
NORTH CAROLINA
Date: 1/29/15
--G wgla com
Stale: 1"=50'

N
lh
,
i
LOCATION MAP
N.TS
i
6
UtEA i'1,, ' IMPACT SITE #4
WEA 4
SITE#6
I )k I A F a- x IMPACT SITE #5
lal NORTHBIDE ROAD r--1
IMPACT SITE #8
1 /
n
IMPACT SITE #7
CULVERT
SITE IMPACT SITE #2
IMPACT #3 - == �yi77h1, II
IMPACT SITE #9
SITE #1
U�r
� z
I4D
W
0
O
U
CANPFIAE a
AMP /ttRUTER AREA
t PROPERTY WFORNA710N
OWIML
WATIACREIXFAR7AS LL.0
'►,, TWO TOWN SQUARE BLVD SUITE ]I0
t�1jII' ASHEVOlE. NC' 78SM
x! 71I OPOSED Cadut DAVIDANOLlETTI
/r iGIRL9 DAWN VSIAGE PN O667t-00.TS317A
PW 880/-06@-3185
PW #6Wt-0Damm
O B 206 Pli 147
PROPOSED DEVELOPER
BOTSCABINVILLAOE YMCA OF WSSTENN NORTH CAROLNA 6
57 ASHLAND AVENUE
It ASNEV07£ NOt7THCAROUHA 70001
OM
P PAUL VEST a �'
k It
KFA
a
Ciellixbfaeyo6� "1 UliilK
GRAPHIC SCALE
' - l2+i'4' Ve.GIA Me Uc :1. °� ° 3�234HPerfLTM .�C .
(a /!af )
\,vr', =�.! F g;'�1�
7 t.e- teo n F -r- ..�;`..� �,ai'` \��= t�- - ���1'�� /,' t:'.?: �111�11�tW »I�Lf:'�I,'��$in11�. -�
a�s ��_ 111
Revisions date:! /16
' R job: 10198
drawn: khls sheet
Govar

0
O
O
a
OL
a
1`
0
Q
0
N
a
t
m
CD
O
ru
J
LL
N
w�
V
m
M
r
ro
7
LL
w
QN
m
H
W
Cr
Cm7
U
co
0
I
LL
Y
m
m
U
0
_T
C7
0
3
9
E
Y
in
w
LL
hAik STONE
OR CLASS "B'
BANKS TO ORIGINAL RI' RAP
GRADE n
IFILTER FAEmIC WATER LEVEL
YIRAF1 140N'QR
EQUAL r VANES �V
5 MAJ -I
2' YIN Q
N _ ° �LCi°ua'f0an"LEa�n T,o�''a
6UCT4E WON ,PIPE —
AE mRESM "jyT DEUCE
O�EAYLdi RPEOTAIB
[�uaoAl Nmcc
101,11 RESTORE,STREAY NATIV101,11 1 CONTRACTOR MUST RESTTiAIN AT
BANKS, TO ORIGINAL OR CLASS v FILTER FABRIC LEAST J JCIN75 EITHER_SIDE OF
GRACE RIP RAP E��1 114M-OR= TME LAST VERTICAL BEND OR AS
OTHfE VASE SPECIFIED BY THE
ENOIV_ER
2- APPROVED RESTRAINING OEMCE5
INCLUDE R TAINING GLANDS,.
p I MEGALUGSF}, FIELD LOCK CASKETS
TS WAU3 i RESTRAINT SYSEEMS PROVIDED
1 2' LR1. BY`APPR0%W PIPE MANUFACTURERS
3, ALL' CREEK' CROSSINGS PALL' REOUf*
P - DI I a _ A EEL ENCC�TPIPE TO ETE :NTIC �
MSABEL RICH WATER MARK`ON THE
qA 'A' BANK OR PAST THE °TOP EDGE OF
DUCTILE 6= hUN. THE BANK
CTILE fRCi PIPE
%-.r-%rl =n t:.KUSSING
BELOW CREEK BOTTOM
NTS
6 "X6" TREATED WOOD
LAKE
r
(1271278"
rltK DOCK DETAIL
kTS
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS S LAND PLANNERS
NC License No: P -1342
214 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC-29792
(828) 687 -7177
wgla com
CAMP WATIA
NANTAHALA TOWNSHIP
SWAIN COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
PIER DETAILS
job#: 10138
Date: 7/ I0/ 15
Scales N.T S.

Camp Watia (+/- 252 Acres)

Jurisdictional Determination Request

Jurisdictional Determination Request
M
us army corps
of Engineers
VAIrrinpton Distdd
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps) Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and protect manager can be
found on -line at: hqp: / /www.saw.usace. army .mil/Missions /RegulatorvPcrmitPro ram aspx , by
telephoning 910 -251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number (828) 281 -8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number. (919) 5544884
Fax Number (919) 562 -0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number- (910) 2514610
Fax Number. (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number 910- 2514633
Fax Number (910) 251 -4025
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS -
Ail requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION. Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address. 5030 Watia Road
City, State: Almond, NC
County: Swain
Directions: From Asheville, take US 74 toward Murphy Turn right onto NC 28 West. Go 2 2 miles
to left turn onto Watia Road Follow Watia road 4 5 miles to the site
Parcel Index Number(s) (PM: 662100753434
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address I
Clement Riddle
224 South Grove Street, Suite F Hendersonville, NC 28792
828 -698 -9800
clement @cwenv com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name, Water Creek Farms, LLC
Mailing Address. Two Town Square Blvd
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
W1Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See Agent Authorization
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One-
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein
This request does NOT include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
F7
G.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area Approximately 252
acres
I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Formb
❑ Project Coordinates. Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum* streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form From Regulatory Guidance Letter No 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version. December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)7:
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets F] Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
F] Landscape Photos, if taken
F] Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes•
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑✓ Project Coordinates: 35 345286N Latitude -83 60063OW Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay
✓❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum. streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
F✓ Soil Survey Map
a✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at
http_ / /www usace army md/ Missions/ CwdWorks/ RegulatorvProgramandPermlts /ree sunp aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at•
http / /aortal ncdenr ore /c /document library /get file?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &grouold =38364 and,
http //www saw usace army mil/ Portals /59 /dots /regulatorv/publicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318 odf
e Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version. December 2013 Page 6

jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries.
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes•
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑✓ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s) ")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type
Version. December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
1. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 1 l "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11''x 17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
F] Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
F] Must be legible
F1Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F] Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F1When tributaries are depicted•
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
F] all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
F1Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted-
include the following Corps Certification language:
`This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of thejurisd►ct►on
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change In the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manuol."
Regulatory Official
Title:
Date•
USACE Action ID No.:
0 When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary-
include the following Corps Certification language.
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for o period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Ti tie •
Date:
USACE Action ID No.
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as
F] be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State.NC County/pansh/borough Swain City- Almond
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat. 35 345286° N, Long -83 600630° W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Townhouse Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows Little Tennessee
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Little Tennessee 06010202
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
® Check if other sites (e g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SiTE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination Date
® Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II• SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There MW "navigable wafers of the US " within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
® Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There 0 "waters of the US " within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): r
® TNWs, including territorial seas
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly'mto TNWs
® Impoundments of junsdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters 13,570 linear feet: 4 width (ft) and/or 2 36 acres
Wetlands 2 43 acres
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on _Fa ablle5`1 — yjQHWM
Elevation of established OHWM (if known) -
2. Non - regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
Boxes checked below shall be supponed by completing the apprupnate sections in Section III below
a For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least °seasonally"
(e g, typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION iII: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IiI.A.I and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource Is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.I and 1
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IiI.B below
1. TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent"
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT iS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section I1I.D.2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available Information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and Its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody'i is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IIi.B.I for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any ons0e wetlands, and Section HLB3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size List
Drainage area Plot +I;1>rt
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(li) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are P71MM river miles from TNW
Project waters are river miles from RPW
Project waters are &List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are ek aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW'
Tributary stream order, if known
4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
Flow route can be described by identifying, e g , tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apps
Tributary is ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man- altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes Pck .
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Stits ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/% cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability f e g, highly eroding, sloughing banks) Explain
Presence of run/nffle/pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides fore -'tom°
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year , elk�]IJst
Describe flow regime.
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is i+l . Characteristics
Subsurface flow Iek Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed of washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain'
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
® High Tide Line indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/charactenstics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(Ili) Chemical Characteristics:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ survey to available datum,
❑ physical markings,
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
Characterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc )
Explain.
Identify specific pollutants, if known
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g , flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'[bid

(Iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply).
❑ Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain.
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW
Flow isI:ta! Explain
Surface flow is:
Characteristics
Subsurface flow- e1[_ I Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by benn/bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are + river miles from TNW
Project waters are F aenal (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is from -
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 7 t floodplam
(11) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e g , water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
characteristics, etc ) Explain
Identify specific pollutants, if known
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquaticlwildlife diversity Explain findings
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis , tdc —List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysts

For each wetland, specify the following
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size ►n acres Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summanze overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and Its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs9
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III D
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III D
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III D
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area.
® TNWs linear feet width (ft), Or, acres
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round arejunsdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Strong bed and bank, substrate sorting, and continuous flow
® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g , typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 13,570 linear feet 4 width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters 2.36 acres
Identify type(s) of waters Open Water
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Q Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdichonal Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section iiI C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
® Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or Indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically Flow year-round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial to Section iIi D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetlands discharge directly into streams.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section iiI B and rationale in Section iII D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates forjunsdictional wetlands in the review area` 2.43 acres
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
IN Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section iII C
Provide acreage estimates for jursdictonal wetlands in the review area acres
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates forjunsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
® Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the US," or
t` Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (l -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑m which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
© from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
® which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Q interstate isolated waters Explain
® Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
°See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iIi D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates forlunsdichonal waters in the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non - wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
19 Wetlands acres
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did'not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
® Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR)
® Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain.
❑� Other (explain, if not covered above).
Provide acreage estimates for nonyunsdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis oflunsdiction is the MBR
factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species,'use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply)
m Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes/ponds acres
® Other non - wetland waters, acres List type of aquatic resource
® Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required forlunsdiction (check all that apply)
® Non - wetland waters (i e, rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft).
© Lakes/ponds acres.
® Other non- wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
® Wetlands acres
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
® Data sheets prepared by the Corps
® Corps navigable waters' study
® U,S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name. 1.24K Wesser
0 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name
0 StatelLocal wetland inventory map(s)
® FEMA/FIRM maps
® 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date).NCCGIA 2010
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
® Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter.
Applicable/supporting case law
® Applicable/supporting sciennfic literature
© Other information (please specify)
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: This 1D form applies to all streams and wetlands in the review area that drain into
Townhouse Branch

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSile i, -o Wad c, City/County
ApplicanUOwner
Sampling Date a III IIT
State tAC. Sampling Point w - KS
Investigalor(s) K rt,�rl.tll Section, Township, Range
Landlorm (h!Ilslope, terrace, etc) ! oP4�,r*Q>,•c Qra. Local relief (concave, convex, none) 17, ^c.Yt Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) VIU" Lai 35 34210 Long ' %3 bo3gLiI Datum NAVg
Soil Map Unit Name S, D sq.•Ll NWI classification tYA
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �_ No (If no, explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation _ , Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are *Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation _ . Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects. important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Sal Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _. ( No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Primary Indicators (minimum or anti !� re�+uR_e,_r.
Surface Water (Al)
Ctio'k au tt,pt --A
Secondary Indicators fndnimum of two ren �tradt
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
High Water Table (A2)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Be)
_
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_Drainage Patterns (810)
tea
Water Marks
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
Deposits
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (Ca)
Drift
_ Alga Mat or Deposits rust
Algal Mai or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_
_ Microtopotgraphic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ CX No
Depth(inches) r'wF
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches). o to
Saturation Present? Yes X Na
ndudes capillary frin e
Depth (inches) n_I�. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring welL aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plotsize ) over Soecies7 Status
2
4
6
7
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 1
1 t)l_.4 Secc�lek� 3 �S DSL
2.
3.
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover-
Herb Stratum (Plot size
L_�� ^gut t?wSUS rJ0 tS fraLw
2 (trs..:N 40 Yes FACW
3
4.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Samalina Point W-A
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant 2
Species Across All Strata / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species lob
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)B)
Total % Cover of
Multtoly by
OBL species
x i =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x3-
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A -
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
LC 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sob and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless or
height
5aplingishrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 It (1
m) tail
Herb - Ail herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 R tall
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft In
1 height
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Total Cover Present? Yes -,.,X— No
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
rs here or an a separate
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Samnhnn Pnint- W -KR
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matrix
_ Redox Features
inches Color (molsil %
Color (moist? % Tvoe Loci
Texture Remarks
o-!a.— ►rya. �r4 g�
s y/b 3 c M
u A.
'Type C= Concentration. D =De lebon, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
'Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SOIIS3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Htstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Patyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prame Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplafn Soils (1779)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain on Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (Fa)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (1719) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layef Of observed).
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Solt Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site (2-0 %1. a;a City /County Swm-e) Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner Stale OIL- Sampling Point W -Kr_
Investigators) Section, Township, Range
Landrarm (hillstope, terrace, etc) I�prsatsel. ;� dint,,, Local relief (concave, convex, none) �Ka.e. Slope (%)- L �-
Subregion (LRR orMLRA) LMrA Let. _ 35 3ti$ -1135 Long -$3- b °aiqa Datum T4 AD 8
Sod Map Unit Name -1 hC. NWI classification N /A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _� No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation . Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �C _ No
Are Vegetaban _ . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts. imnnrtant fpahirac ate-
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? Yes X_ No
Hydric Sod Present? Yes _ A No Is the Sampled Area
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes ( No within a Wetland? Yes _IX-- No
r1 T IJKULUlt T
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators fminttnum of two requuedl
teary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired•
Surface Water (Al)
Cherie all that nr)prVi
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (86)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1370)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iran Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_- Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (137)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
,L Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water- Staffed Leaves (139)
_ Micratopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Feld Observations:
Surface Water Resent? Yes l' _ No
Depth (inches) rote.
Water Table Present? Yes A No
Depth (inches)- 0-1,,X
Saturation Present? Yes _A No
ncludes ca illa frin e)
Depth (inches) OO_ _. 1>,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Soecles7 Status
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cove
50% of total cover 20% of total cover_
rks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Sampllnq Point ^l -&
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, WFAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata oZ (8)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC too (AfB)
Total % Cover of
MuIIIDIv by
= Total Cover
xi.
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
SaohnglShnd)
Stratum (Plot size t
FACU spades
1
UPL species
NItS al(
2
(A) (B)
3
4
5
6
7
8
s
= Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% Of total cover
Herb Stralum (Plot size )
1
eQ-.u,.
5
2
-
±AGyj
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover.
_Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size. )
1
2
3
4
5
= Total Cove
50% of total cover 20% of total cover_
rks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Sampllnq Point ^l -&
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, WFAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata oZ (8)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC too (AfB)
Total % Cover of
MuIIIDIv by
081- species
xi.
FACW species
x 2 -
FAC spedes
x 3 =
FACU spades
x 4 -
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A -
— 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophybc Vegetation
ZC 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
date in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (1381-1), regardless of
height.
SapiingfShnrb - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DSH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - A8 herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 h in
I Hydrophylic
Vegetation
r Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point- `kKL
Profile Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
inches — Color (moisil %
Redox Feature
_Color (moist) % Tine Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -1 _IOYQ Lila 9�T
1019 =11if. S C
►a..,
'Type C= Concentrallon, D =De lelron. RM= Reduced Matrix. MS-Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
:Location PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix.
_ Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
Indicators for Problem adc Hydric Solls':
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_,
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 an Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Suiride (A4)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
_
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
_ Stratifted Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1779)
_, 2 an Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
—
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA,136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophyhc vegetation and
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (1719) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
wetland hydrology must be present
Restrictive Layer of observed).
unless disturbed or problematic
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes. No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site C&-? } I��� City /County 5w&,1 Sampling Date 9141I;
Appllcant/Owner State tAC- Sampling Point.
Investigator(s) It A -4d,,,,A Section, Township, Range•
Landform (hllslope, terrace, etc) lctnv Local relief (concave, convex, none) Co++ a Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) L94-1-1 Lai 35 3q q q 58
Long 'S53 6003p3 Datum aA�
Sod Map Unit Name Cw A - Cvlowhu - z
V NWI classification a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain In Remarks)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X_ No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transectS. important features_ Ptr
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes k No
Hydric Sol Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area
within a Weiland? Yes_ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes -2L_ No
Remarks
ri YUKULUUY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondery Indicators (minimum of two requred)
Plhnary Indicators (minimum of one is recurred check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (810)
1L Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss True Lines (Bi6)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Y, Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B7 3)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
Field Observations.
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches).
Water Table Present? Yes _X No
Depth (inches): + IC
Saturation Present7 Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Depth (inches). 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -A— No
_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wen, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps or Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indic-1-i
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Soecies7 Status
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover_
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Samohna Point. 4.1'1D
Number of Dominant Species 3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent or Dominant Species (o 0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A1B)
Total 9f Cover of
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size t
x 2 =
1 ln,� Secr�la}+�
SSd _ Yes 05L
2
x 4 =
3
x 5 =
4
(A) (B)
5
B/A -
6
7
e
9
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
2o% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size. )
1 Carte `g
.35_ t3 Ar-W
2 rrniuti
�_ —�— C,,,-_,
�'�
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
- Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. )
1
2
3
4
5
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover_
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Samohna Point. 4.1'1D
Number of Dominant Species 3
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent or Dominant Species (o 0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A1B)
Total 9f Cover of
Multiply by
OBL species
xi =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 -
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index -
B/A -
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophydc Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is X50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tres - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingiShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 M DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps or Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Samnlinn Pnrnt w -ren
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confine the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Inches Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
b-Q_ 1049- 4/1 45
to `/a- `i /L 5 C
'T a C =Concentration. D=De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains
'Location PL-Pore Lmin M= Matnx.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails'.
_ Hislosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (I-RR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N.
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (Fl 3) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_, Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (it observed):
Type
Depth (inches)
-
Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

Camp Watia ( +/- 252 Acres)

Z
m
C
O
m
c
0
co
Q
•c
a�
0
to N J
N _:•., p
Lo 0 = = c
co CM M M
LL
1 `." "�,�° � -ter ,��•' e .
M ����
y21 f l
C
N /0 ��� — Q N
�p i C N
LL
Ln
V + N
l' \ I lili i` 1�4 o
ca
�'� \ \,�4>�
L.
CD
N m `.` :a. lam.•
CY) Q ^— r�� r
�0
P I
,..�• , I � ' ; , __)� fir, , ; • __ �'� ,�,�* —'- � k x: ;•�' S+�
cn n r.
r CVO
E J Q
CD c
d
N� 0
N
v
C
N
N
I
LL
0
r
a
V,
�a
N- 0 0
1'7 O
O
O U N r is
oW
"
co Y
a['1
O
_ f'f Q N O {3
r
N
y
�j
3
N M t an
f0 r
w O) O C N 0
N
O
O ~
as rvi�m$g�
c
O
` 'a
°i no
N
u
O
cu
ti
E a
b!3
�
Q
y
"V
ca
U
�
C
s a e° -
LL
47
_
to r a0 Q1 O ^ Pl
CCS
L ^�'
to N J
N _:•., p
Lo 0 = = c
co CM M M
LL
1 `." "�,�° � -ter ,��•' e .
M ����
y21 f l
C
N /0 ��� — Q N
�p i C N
LL
Ln
V + N
l' \ I lili i` 1�4 o
ca
�'� \ \,�4>�
L.
CD
N m `.` :a. lam.•
CY) Q ^— r�� r
�0
P I
,..�• , I � ' ; , __)� fir, , ; • __ �'� ,�,�* —'- � k x: ;•�' S+�
cn n r.
r CVO
E J Q
CD c
d
N� 0
N
v
C
N
N
I
LL
0
r
a
V,
�a
^W
z
oW
"
•
a . IL
• U
3m7iE L -5 a�
o c m
0
aV
«Yii JJJ
y
�j
O
if E
N
O
ap�E
as rvi�m$g�
ma^Am
O
` 'a
°i no
N
O
cu
ti
E a
b!3
.ono
g
y
"V
ca
U
�
Y gpC m
s a e° -
LL
0
CCS
L ^�'
•
a . IL
• U
3m7iE L -5 a�
o c m
t N
if E
ap�E
as rvi�m$g�
ma^Am
O
` 'a
°i no
Ei.o mqa
41
E a
n °csm -EE
.ono
g
¢..•
Y gpC m
s a e° -
LL
f Y
m i co r
'Elg
L° c
_m�os�fi�a
N
c�Emg
g'
a
a
€m
MME E
w
S
--
a o
3 c
g m n m 2
2 3 9 2
n $ g
€
ri m
�� m r
—v— a a
�2�m°
L
m�a
N
m
HIM
�$E
°�Ea
npmq
om
mj
5Zm
mmiE�S�a+
�m5a
W
U
t: 'o
N C
c
o
e-
m
7 `O
L
cc
w,
CCV
CD
C
C
C
O
O
O
N
N
a--
C _
C
i
W J
0 0
0
m
C
O
U cz
�U
C/) Z